Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042396 CC Agenda in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting 128 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD APRIL 23, 1996 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinancep No. 9E-M Resolution: No. q -47 CALL TO ORDER:Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding invocation:Reverend Steven Leinhos, New Community Lutheran Church Flag Salute:Councilmember Birdsall ROLL CALL:Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PROCLAMATIONS PRESENTATIONS/Certificates of Appreciation Arts Council of the Temecula Valley Rancho Temecula Area Woman's Club Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club Proclamation - National Nurses' Month Presentation by Citizens for a Safer Temecula (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilman Stone) PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or are listed on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item n= listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. R:\Ager,da\042390 When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPOM Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 0) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1Standard Ordinance Adogtion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2AQ12roval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. 3Resolution A1212rovina List of Dem@ RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:@e@\042396 2 4City Attorney Services RECOMMENDATION: 4.1Retain Peter Thorson as City Attorney for the City of Temecula; 4.2Terminate the Agreement for City Attorney Services with Burke, Williams & Sorensen Attorneys dated September 26, 1996; 4.3Enter into an Agreement for City Attorney Services With Richards, Watson and Gershon Attorneys at Law. 5Purchase of Radio System Eguogment RECOMMENDATION: 5.1Approve the purchase of City Radio Equipment from Comtronix of Hemet for a total cost of $17,265.37. 6Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: 6.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 7Accept the Offers of Dedication for Public Street and Utility Purposes along the Walcott Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 7.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES 8Sewer Aareement with Mervyn's for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester oad at Interstate Route 1 5. Bridae Wedenona and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1Approve the Agreement and Grant of Easement, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents. R:\Agerida\042396 3 9Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and S12ec*f6catoons for the Interim Traffic S*gnal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive - Prowect No. PW96-03 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1Approve the construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW96-03, Traffic signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive. 10Proaram Supplement No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aod Prooects for SR 15 and Overland Drove overcrossing Proiect (PW 95-1 1) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(001), SR 15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING 1 1Proaram Supg)lement No. 002 to the Local Aaency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for SR 1 5 and Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project (PW 95-12) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(002), SR 1 5/RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT R:@endo\042396 4 1 2Proaram Supplement No. 008 to the Local Agency/State Aareement for Federal-Awd Proiects for the Barrier Rail at Front Street and empire Creek (PW95-1 7) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-5459(007), BARRIER RAIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK 1 3Award of Contract for the Rancho Calefornia/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5. Proiect No. PW95-25 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1Award a contract for the construction of the Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5, project No. PW95-25 to Gosney Development, for $27,430.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 13.2Authorize the City manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,743.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 14Aareement Regarding Prol2osed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Pala Road Bridoe over Temecula Creek RECOMMENDATION: 14.1Approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification No. 5-004-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public works to sign said Agreement. 15Construction Cooperative Aareement, State of California, County of Riverside, Cot@ Temecula - 1-1 5/SR 79(51 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1Approve the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the State of California, County of Riverside and City of Temecula, Route 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange South Junction, Agreement No. 8-932, 08303-350510. R:@enda\042396 5 1 6Authorize Cost Participation with Temecula Valley Unified School District for the Installation of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Winchester and Roripauah Roma RECOMMENDATION: 16.1Authorize participation in the cost of a Traffic Signal Installation with Temecula Valley Unified School district to be constructed as a portion of the Winchester road Widening Project in the amount of two-thirds of the estimated cost to design and construct the signal. 1 7Release Gradina Security for Exi2ort of Soils (Located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1Authorize release of the Grading Security for Export of soils materials from the Southeast corner of Margarita Road at Winchester Road to several sites along the northerly side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Nicolas Road; 17.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 1 8Approval of Aareement Reaardina Transfer of Drainage Facilities to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Located at Ynez Road northerly of Motor Car Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1Approve the agreement between Advanced Cardiovascular Systems ("ACS"), the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ('DISTRICT"), and the City of Temecula ('CITY') for transfer of Drainage Facilities to the DISTRICT; 18.2Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 18.3Direct the City Clerk to attest thereto and to transmit the document to the DISTRICT for final processing through the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. 1 9Parcel Map No. 27987-1 (Located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen Way - Vail Ranch Commercial Ctr.) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1Approve Parcel Map No. 27987-1 subject to the conditions of approval, and the Developer providing proof of payment of property taxes and any special assessments prior to release of the map for recordation. R:@endakO42396 a 20Accel2tance of Drainage Easement in Portion of Tract 22916-3 and Ouitcla*m to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Located Northwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63 IN TRACT NO. 22916-3) 21Amendment to Staff Report: Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Soanal at the Intersection of Maraarota road and State Route 79 (South), Promect No. PW95-15 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1Appropriate $45,000 in Signal Mitigation Funds from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital Improvement Project Fund. 22Sul2l2ort of AB 3382 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING AB 3382 WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEE@ OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY R:\AgerideNO42396 7 COMMtjNfTY@SERVICES@@DISTRICT@MEETING@@.,@@@'..",@, Next in Order: Ord*nancee No. CSD 96-M Resolutoonw No. CSD 9E-M CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberts ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the re@ CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. 2Release of Bond for Tract 25004-1. Barclay Estates (Located at Seraphina Road at Jons Place) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of the TCSD slopes and landscaped area within Tract No. 25004-1, Barclay Estates. R:\Agend*%042396 8 3Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc. (Located on Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials bond for the construction of Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc. 4Award of Contract for Construction of Sports Park Creek Restoration (Project No. PW95- 10CSD) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1Approve the plans and specifications for he construction of the Sports Park Creek Restoration Project PW95-10 CSD. 4.2Award a construction contract in the amount of $195,059.00 to R.K. Allen Landscape Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract. 4.3Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $19,505.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:@@\042396 TEMECULA@REDEVELOPMENT@AGENCY@MEETING::,@..,.". Next in Order Ordinance: No. RDA 96-01 Resolution No. RDA 96-11 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. AGENCY BUSINESS 2Great Temecula Tractor Race RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Consider a request for sponsorship of the 1996 Great Temecula Tractor Race. R:@@\042396 10 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS RECESS TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD- TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT Fl ANCING AUTHORITY R:\Agertda\042396 1 1 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE:COMMUNITY@ FACILITIES@ DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY.,@"...,., Next Ordere Resolution No.0 No. FA 96-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item n= listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address, CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. RECESS TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY R:Vkgonda\042396 1 2 ... .... .. .... ..... .. ...... ..... . ..@OtO::TOWN@@WESTSIDE@@IMPROVEMENT@@@AUTHORITY@...."..'.'. ... ................ ... ... ................ .. ......... ..... ..... CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item = listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address, CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn the meeting. R: a%042390 13 RECONVENE TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Mayor Karel L*ndemans Presiding 23Funancinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Syl2ass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 23.1That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.2That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS 23.3That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY RECESSTO EXECUTE THE JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FINANCING AUTHORITY Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall Presidinci 24Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Conidor - Old TowntWestside Improvement Authority RECOMMENDATION: 24.1That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/VVESTSIDE IMPRO\IEMENT AUTHORITY R:@nda\042396 14 25Financinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 25.1That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS 25.2That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) 25.3That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWNIWEST COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 25.4That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT R:@rida\042396 Is 25.5That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION RECESS TO OPEN BALLOTS 25.6That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN 25.7Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) ADJOURN THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETINGS Next regular meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:@anda\042396 is COUNCIL BUSINESS 26Starlight Ridge - Traffic Stu@d RECOMMENDATION: 26.1Support the findings of Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study. 27Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Proiect, Proiect No, PW94-10 RECOMMENDATION: 27.1Conduct a hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public comments and close the hearing; 27.2Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain proceeding so as to acquire the Property. RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT) (Note:This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council.) 27.3Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; 27.4Approve a warrant in the amount of $10,460.00, payable to the Clerk of the Superior Court for the deposit required to be made with Court. 27.5Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. 28Memorandum of Understanding Conceminci Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Proiect Services, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 28.1Approve the Memorandum of Understanding concerning Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Project Services, Inc. For authorizing the payment of development fees at a specified level and directing the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R;@anda\042396 17 29City Commissioner Term Limits and Monthly Compensation RECOMMENDATION: 29.1Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TERM LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS 29.2Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:@erideNO42390 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLMATION the month of May is designated annually as National Nurses' Month, and WHEREAS, The nursing profession represents one of America's -reat ID national resources; and WHEREAS, each year nurses contribute to the betterment of their communities through their competence, efficiency, and dedication to healing; and WHEREAS, nurses are a valued and vital part of this community, contributing greatly to the health and well-being of our citizens as they give Generously of their time, energy and compassion; NO W , 'ILREFORE, I, Karel F. Lindemans, on behalf of the City Council of the Cityof Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be UNATIONAL NURSES MONTH" in the City of Temecula, and encourage the citizens to recognize the nurses of the Temecula Valley and especially of the Ramona Visiting Nurses Association and Hospice when the nation is observing National Nurses Month. IN S @EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 22nd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk CitTof Temecula Certificate of Appreciation Presented in appreciation and gratitude on be]Lalf of the ci@ens of the City of Tem@ To: olde For their generous participation in funding and purchasing a piano ]Leyboar4l ins@ent to be used and enjoyed b-y the citizens and organizations who use the Com-muni@ Recreation Center facilities. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 23rd day of April, 1996 @l F. Lindemans, Ma-yor June S. Gree]L, CMC CiiT Cler]L CitTof Temecula Certificate of Appreciation Presentea in appreciation ana gratitu(le on behalf of the cii6e,ns of the CiiT of Temecula To: @4a For their generous participation in funding ana purchasing a piano ]Leyboara instrument to be used ana enjoyed by the citizens ana organizations who use the Community Recreation Center facilities In Witness @ereof, I have hereunto affixea my h&ua ana official seal this 23ra day of Apra, 1996 @l F. Lindemans, @or June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk CifTof Temecula Certificate of Appreciafion Presentea in appreciation ana gratitude on belkalf of the ci@e,ns of the City of Temecx& To: &, .0 For their generous p@cipafion in funding ana purchasing a piano keyboard instrument to be usea ana enjoyed b. the citizens ana organizations who use the CommunitT Recreation Center facilities. In Witnesii Whereof, I have hereunto d&ea my hana &na official seal this 23rd day of Apra, 1996 @l F. Lindem&us, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk . ITEI\4 1 ITEI\4 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 9, 1996 EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:45 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, real property located at 28535 Pujol Street (APN 922-054-004) and 28545 Pujol Street (APN 922-054-005), Temecula. The negotiating parties are: Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Elizabeth Otto. Under negotiation will be the price and terms of payment for the real property. 2. Conference with Legal Counsel concerning existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). The title of the litigation is: Strachota Insurance Company v. City of Temecul . et, al. 3. The Council will consider the appointment/employment of a person for the position of City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall and Councilmember Stone absent. Mayor Lindemans recessed the closed session 6:37 PM. A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Karel F.Lindemans presiding. PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Jeremy Swizek, World Harvest Outreach. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Cub Scout Pack 302. Minutes\040996 -1- 04/16/96 Cety Counc*l M4nutes At)ril 9. 1996 ri C)SFD SESSION REPORT City Manager Bradley reported that the City Council reaffirmed the appointment of Peter Thorson as City Attorney and directed staff to prepare a new agreement with the law firm of Richards, Watson and Gershon, to be placed on the City Council Agenda of April 23, 1996. City Attorney Thorson reported that the City Council authorized the defense and indemnification of City employees named in the law suit filed by Strachota Insurance Company. He reported the City employees will be represented by Richard J. Schneider of the law firm Daley & Heft and he would represent the City. PRESENTATIONSI PROCLAMATIONS Don Jenkins, Cub Master of Cub Scout Pack 302, spoke regarding the meaning of the 'Arrow of Light' award, explaining it is Cub Scoutings highest award. Mayor Lindemans presented the following cub scouts with a certificate of achievement for attaining the 'Arrow of Light' award: Ryan Loucks, Kyle Odell, Jesse Minor, Trevor Moran, Edward Benson, Ryan Hall, Joshua Smith and Doug Bennett. Mayor Lindemans awarded the students chosen to represent the City as Sister City Exchange Students a Special Achievement Award. They are as follows: Students traveling to Nakayama, Japan Students Traveling to Voorburg, Holland Kelly Hagberg Tyler Glen Lilah Mavis Peter Femia Ellen Warkenfine Brooke Bensen Stephanie Slane Katie Lieberg Crystal Joe Eric Ruggles Bekki Hoffman Mayor Lindemans proclaimed Saturday, April 20, 1996 to be 'Health Fair Expo '96. Anne Cuss, representing Inland Valley Regional Medical Center, thanked the Mayor for the proclamation and described the many screenings and demonstrations that will be held in conjunction with this event. Alicia Ramirez, representing the Center for Employment Training - Federally Funded Job Training, gave a presentation to the City Council and public regarding the services that the Center provides and invited the City Council and public to visit the Center. PUBLIC COMMENTS Joseph R. Terrazas, 31160 Lahonton Street, requested an explanation of the bond financing discussed at the previous meeting. City Manager Bradley stated that the initial set of hearings that set both Community Facilities Districts in place were held but details regarding this issue will be heard at a future meeting. Minutes\040996 -2- 04/15/96 C*tv Council Mbnutes At)ril 9. 1996 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ford stated he attended a joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee Meeting where recommendations were made regarding freeways and overcrossings, he said he will hold his report until after the April 18, 1996 meeting when construction plans will be discussed. Councilmember Roberts requested staff place a discussion of AB 3382 on the next agenda. He also requested staff and the Council look into participation in the Riverside County Child and Youth Summit to take place in May. Mayor Lindemans expressed concern about the negative press coverage regarding the Border Patrol check point in Temecula. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Roberts stated he would abstain on Item 2, since he did not attend that meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve consent Calendar Items 1-12 with Councilmember Roberts abstaining on Item No. 2. AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone 1 . standard Ordinance Adogtion Procedmm 1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2.Approval of Minutes 2.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996. AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts Minutes\040996 -3- 04/15/96 City Council Minutes ADfil 9. 1996 3.Resolution A12proving List of Dem@ 3.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4.City Treasu='s Regort 4.1Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 29, 1996. 5.Release of Bonds for Maroarita Road Widening Improvemenla (Located on Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way) 5.1Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds posted in accordance with the Agreement between the City and the Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc., for the widening of Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way; 5.2Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Contractor and Surety. 6.Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of Plans and Specifications for the FY95- 96 Concrete Repaors (Project No. PW96-06) 6.1Approve the construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW96-06, FY95-96 Concrete Repairs. 7.Award a Contract to Remove and Replace A.C. on Winchester Road, Public Works Maintenance - Project No. PW95-96-21 7.1Award a contract to Nelson Paving and Sealing (NPG, Corp.), to remove and replace A.C. for east and west bound traffic on Winchester Road between bridge deck and Enterprise Circle South. 8.Contract Change Order No. 2 for Citywide A.C. Street Rel2air, Proiect No. PW95-M 8.1Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project No. PW95-20, for additional A.C. overlays in the amount of $1,193.50. Minutes%040996 -4- 04/15196 City Council Minutes At)ril S. 1996 9.Destruction of Records Request 9.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 10.Support of SB 1 590 10.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SUPPORTING INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION OF A VALIDATING ACT IN RESPONSE TO SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY VS. GUARDINO SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 11.Second Reading of Ordinance No. 96-06 11.1Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0019, ZONING AMENDMENT, AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO DELETE THE RETIREMENT ORIENTED HOUSING RESTRICTION, AMEND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREAS NO. 38 AND 40 AND DELETE REFERENCES TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY Minutes\040996 04/15/96 City Councol Minutes ADril 9. 1996 12.Second Readona of Ordinance No. 96-07 12.1Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.24.080 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO EXCESSIVE ACCELERATION RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 7:35 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:17 PM following the previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting, Redevelopment Agency Meeting, Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meeting and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13.Planning Apgl*cation No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zonang Amendment) - Chardonnay Hills Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Lindemans opened the public hearing at 8:20 PM. Joseph D. Taylor, 41005 Montelena Circle, stated he is in favor of increasing the home sizes however he is concerned about community improvements promised by the developer. He expressed concern regarding landscaping and recreational facilities. Brad Bassi, 32233 Chemin Laurent, spoke in favor of staff recommendation, but expressed concern over the following areas: phasing, greenbelts, Butterfield Stage Road and Mission Meadows Road connection and the second recreational facility. He stated he is most concerned about the green belt area, since it is currently full of weeds and silt and could cause future problems. Mayor Lindemans closed the public hearing at 8:30 PM. Councilmember Ford suggested staff facilitate a meeting with the homeowners and developers to address these issues. Minutes\040996 -6- 04/15/96 C@ty Councol Minutes April 9. 1996 It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to continue the public hearing for one month with direction to staff to facilitate a meeting with the applicants, staff and the homeowners to establish a time line for the various improvements to include the scheduling of phases, greenbeits, Butterfield Stage Road and Mission Meadows Road completions and completion of the second Recreation Facility. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone 14.Annexat*on Guidelines for the City of Temecula It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to continue the public hearing to the meeting of May 14, 1996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. Minutes\040996 -7- 04/15/96 Coty Council Monutes At)fil 9. 1996 ADJOUR MENT it was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn at 8:37 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmembers Birdsall and Stone absent. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes\040996 -8- 04/15/96 ITEN4 3 RESOLUNON NO. 96- ARESOLUTION OF THE CrrY COUNCIOL OF THE CrrY OF A ALLOWING CERTAIN CLADIS AND D S AS SET FORTH IN EXHIOBrr A THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following cwms and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City @ager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $736,700.58. Section 2. The City Clerk shau ce@ the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPRED, this 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] Resos\103 STATE OF CALEFORNIA) COUNTY OF SBDE) SS CrrY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at a regulir meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following rofl call vote: AM: COUNCEL ERS: NOES: COUNCIIL ERS: ABSENT: COUNC ERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Resos\103 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/04/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 248,821.97 04/11/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 54,613.36 04/23/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 298,384.61 04/04/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 134,880.64 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/23/96 COUNCIL MEETING: $736,700.58 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKSI 001 GENERAL $ 115,900.10 100 GAS TAX 34,139.03 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 4,a45.53 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 79,775.74 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 5,066.29 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 587.25 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,895.03 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 391.79 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 92,792.17 280 RDA-CIP 241,819.74 300 INSURANCE 2,909.66 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 7,069.65 330 SUPPORTSERVICES 5,049.25 340 FACILITIES 6,133.71 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 $ 601,819.94 r'AYROLL: 001 GENERAL $83,098.60 100 GAS TAX 15,987.12 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 458.21 190 TCSD 23,378.42 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 625.33 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 697.14 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,369.68 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 394.91 280 RDA-CIP 2,440.31 300 INSURANCE 586.47 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,835.57 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 804.35 340 FACILITIES 2,204.53 134,880.64 TOTAL BY FUND: $736,700.58 PREPARED BY RETA JEAN WESTON 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/04/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: $ 248,821.97 04/11/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: 54,613.36 04/23/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: 298,384.61 04/04/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 134,880.64 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/23/96 COUNCIL MEETING: $736,700.58 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $ 115,900.10 100 GAS TAX 34,139.03 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 4,845.53 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 79,775.74 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 5,066.29 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 587.25 193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C 2,895.03 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 391.79 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 92,792.17 280 RDA-CIP 241,819.74 300 INSURANCE 2,909@66 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 7,069.65 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,049.25 340 FACILITIES 6,133.71 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 $ 601,819.94 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL $83,098.60 100 GAS TAX 15,987.12 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 458.21 190 TCSD 23,378.42 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 625.33 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 697.14 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,369.68 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 394.91 280 RDA-CIP 2,440.31 300 INSURANCE 586.47 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,835.57 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 804.35 340 FACILITIES 2,204.53 134,880.64 TAL BY FUND: $736,700.58 PREPAREDp4ETA 1, @/,M I HEREBY CERTIFYTHATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. GENIE R@ERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT, RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13 04104/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 73,825.95 100 GAS TAX FUND 15,988.64 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 354.04 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 26,504.34 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 4,178.77 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 8 578.79 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,724.58 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 371.21 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 9,614.62 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP 101,764.50 300 INSURANCE FUND 992.65 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,208.24 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,240.01 340 FACILITIES 5,030.63 TOTAL 248,821.97 4OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 Pl@4/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS YOUCkERi CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28444 03/29/96 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST WATER METER I PRKVIEW STATION 210-190-626-5804 7,095.00 7,095.00 28445 03/29/96 002269 MAX GILLIS BAND MUSIC-SPRING SWING DANCE 190-180-999-5301 800.00 800.00 28446 03/29/96 002276 AD ART ELECTRONIC SIGN DOW/ PAYMENT ON AUTO MALL SIGN 280-1530 100,000.00 100,000.00 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 12,982.87 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,741.92 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX @IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 29.55 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,909.45 655601 G4/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX [IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 93.57 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 84.43 655601 04iO4/96 000283 FIRSTAX ( IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 417.63 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX @IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 78.22 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 161.22 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 128.52 655601 04iD4/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 379.82 655501 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 122.53 6945601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 163.89 111 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,109.38 1 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 592.21 bo@601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 14.62 655501 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 830.63 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 21.68 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 23.48 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 86.28 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 14.75 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 76.29 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.44 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 78.46 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 26.62 655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 72.86 25,263.32 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 51.78 677537 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 9.57 677517 04/D4/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 64.01 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 5.00 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 8.50 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 4.90 677597 04104/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 3,461.30 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 100-2070 683.27 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 8.91 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 654.87 677591 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 17.57 @77;97 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 10.68 7 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 193-2070 98.78 -j7 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 17.07 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 31.29 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 38.17 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 92.35 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 25.10 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALLPERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 20.34 5,303.46 26449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-110-999-5230 411.57 28449 04/04/96 000680 A N S - T U S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-162-999-5230 84.98 28449 04/04/96 000680 A 0 S - T W S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-120-999-5230 677.50 28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 190-180-999-5230 166.65 28449 04/04/96 000680 A 9 S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-140-999-5230 644.07 28449 04/04/96 000680 A W S - T N S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-150-999-5230 50.01 28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 9 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 100-164-604-5230 775.06 28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 0 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-161-501-5230 115.28 28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 9 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-161-502-5230 115.27 3,041.39 28450 04/04/96 002158 A S A P SERVICES INC. STREET STRIPING PROGRAM 100-164-502-5410 928.60 928.60 28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AYP 001-2310 515.98 28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-2310 80.51 28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 4.18 28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 72.40 28451 04/04/95 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.14 28451 04iO4/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 2.44 28451 04/04/96 000116 A Y P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70 28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA PWT FOR APRIL 96 001-1180 9.75 707.10 28452 04iO4/96 001912 ALLMON, VYLANI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 312.00 312.00 28453 04/04/96 001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION MARCH COPIER SERVICE AGREEMENT 330-199-999-5217 217.18 217.18 26454 04/04/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 3/16 BARNETT 190-180-999-5118 288.96 288.95 2845; 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY HALL .340-199-999-5240 286.37 2845'j 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-5240 7.72 28455 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER - MAINT, YARD 100-164-601-5240 25.28 319.37 28456 04/04/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER HVAC/ELECT SRVCS/CRC 190-182-999-5250 906.99 906.99 26457 04/04/96 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY COMM PACKAGE:PUJOL ST 300-1655 575.00 575.00 28458 04/04/96 BENSEN, BROOKE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28459 04/04/96 000791 C P S R P C ANNUAL MEMB:S.NELSON 190-180-999-5226 130.00 130.00 4'6460 04/04/96 002274 C S U S FOUNDATION OTS SUMMIT '96:LEGGETT/4/22-25 001-170-999-5261 175.00 175.00 28461 04/04/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROVE/HINTERGARDT PARK 190-180-999-5415 957.30 957.30 28462 04/04i96 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M CONFILCT RESO/' jOl-161-501-5261 79.00 79 26463 04/04/96 CASTRO, JUAN REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00 28464 04/04/96 002275 CATHEDRAL HILL HOTEL HOTEL:OTS SUMMT:LEGGET:4/22-25 001-170-999-5261 364.00 364.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 0"'14/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS vouchER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28465 04/04/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS:SPEED LIMIT 50 A 55 100-164-601-5244 395.17 28465 04/04/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS:35 ZONE AHEAD 100-164-601-5244 80.81 475.98 28466 04/04/95 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL LEASE PUT FOR TELE SYSTM 320-199-999-5391 34.04 28466 04/04i36 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL LEASE PUT FOR TELE SYSTM 320-2800 1,393.53 1,427.57 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 AAS 001-2330 39.75 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 AIS 190-2330 39.75 26487 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 001-2330 18.75 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 100-2330 47.75 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 190-2330 114.25 26467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 167.91 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330 58.19 28467 04iO4/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 165-2330 6.47 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 89.64 28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 6.47 588.93 28468 04/04/96 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING FOR CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 135.00 135.00 99 04/04/96 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50 264'@0 04/04/96 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS SUPPLY 100-164-601-5218 5.28 5.28 28471 04/04/96 000155 DAVLIN BROADCAST OF COUNCIL MEETINGS 001-100-999-5250 800.00 800.00 28472 04/04/96 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL NOS VETERINARY SERVICES K-9 UNIT 001-17D-999-5327 39.00 39.00 264173 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AWIN 001-2340 15.00 28473 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADY 001-1180 8.39 28413 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 2847-@ 04/D4/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-REV 001-1180 8.39- 2647@ 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 31.78 28474 04/04/96 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 COLEMAN 001-150-999-5118 72.24 72.24 2647; 04/04/96 002272 DOLLAR RENT A CAR COMM SRVC CF/4/10-12/JN,HM,RS 190-180-999-5258 271.32 271.32 28476 04/D4/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO POLICE BADGE FOR NEW MAYOR 001-100-999-5220 61.20 26476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN A CO WALLET FOR MAYORS POLICE BADGE 001-100-999-5220 31.00 28476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENWANN-ROVIN & CO FREIGHT 001-100-999-5220 5.52 26476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO TAX 001-100-999-5220 6.90 104.62 26477 04/04/96 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE REPAIR MAINLINE SANTIAGO/YNEZ 193-180-999-5212 177.67 177.67 @@478 04/04/96 000478 FAST SIGNS NELENE FOX, SIGNS 190-180-999-5244 90.00 8 04/04/96 000478 FAST SIGNS TAX 190-180-999-5244 6.98 96.98 26479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 165-199-999-5250 9.50 28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 9.50 28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 9.50 28473 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 33.19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-501-5230 23.25 84.94 28480 04/04/96 FEMIA, PETER SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28481 04/04/96 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 001-150-999-5248 170.00 170.00 28482 04/04/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-6664-0391-0214/J.K. 100-164-604-5260 106.69 106.69 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 521.94 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 100-2360 101.97 26483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 2.13 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 114.76 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 4.25 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 8.50 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2350 12.75 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 2.12 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 7.22 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 4.24 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 8.50 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 8.50 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 19.12 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 892.41 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 100-2380 171.39 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 5.28 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 185.99 28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 5.85 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 p@.89 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 1,0.31 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 4.76 28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 280-2380 14.27 28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 7.08 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 18.52 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 6.89 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 22.83 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 927.83 28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 100-2500 181.07 26463 04/04/95 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 165-2500 5.59 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 195.53 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 6.19 21483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 7.29 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 21.49 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 5.04 28481 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 280-2500 15.10 28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 7.49 28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 320-2500 19.59 28483 04/@04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 330-2500 7.29 284a3 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 340-2500 24.16 3,602.ij 28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR CALENDARS 001-161-501-5220 43.02 28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR CALENDARS 001-161-502-5220 20.44 28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR 96 CALENDARS 001-161-502-5220 53.23 116.69 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 tl""4/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28486 04/D4/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-3526/FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 80.15 28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-693-0956/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26.96 28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4356/KENT HINTERGARDT 320-199-999-5208 28.66 28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-8927/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 25.80 28486 04i'04@196 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-699-2475/PUBLIC WORKS 100-164-601-5208 38.24 26486 0 4 / 04 / 9 6 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-699-7945/CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 51.59 2 5 1 . 40 284817 04/04/96 001355 G T ECALIFORNIA, INC. MONTHLY ACCESS CHARGES 320-199-999-5208 305.00 305.00 26486 04/04/96 GLEN, TYLER SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 449.48 28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 45.87 28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 62.71 28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 41.51 28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 7.43 607.00 ' @4iD4/i6 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI SUB:GAAFR NEWSLETTER/G.ROBERTS 001-140-999-5228 50.00 50.00 264SL @l 041'04/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 190-180-999-5250 41.67 il 04/041,'96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 100-164-601-5250 41.66 @6491 04/04/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 001-162-999-5250 41.67 28431 04/04/98 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM SERVICES FOR CABOOSE 340-199-999-5250 75.00 200.00 2&4i2 04/04/96 NAGBERG, KELLY SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 2649-.@ 04/04/96 HOFFMAN, BEKKI SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28494 04/04/96 002273 HOTEL PACIFIC COMM SRVCS CF/EDWARDS/4/10-12 190-180-999-5258 327.80 327.80 2849' 04/04/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,718.24 28'495 04/04/96 000194 1 0 W A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 100-2080 224.83 261"+35 04/04/96 000194 1 C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 530.42 2-049;@ 041104/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 28.04 2,501.53 284@6 04/04/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 145.66 28496 04/04/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 100-2140 145.65 291.31 26497, 04/04/96 JOE, CRYSAL SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28496 04/04/96 JONES, MARY REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00 26439 04/04/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES P/C SRVCS/WESTERN BY-PASS 210-165-612-5802 587.50 567.50 04/04/96 002277 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL WOODY'S WISE WASTE BROCHURE 194-180-999-5254 66.95 66.95 ..ul @4/04/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 113.15 285@l 04/04/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 219.65 332.80 28502 04/04/q6 002023 KING, WENDE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 672.00 672.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28503 04/04/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 22.03 22.03 28504 04/04i96 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC. POOL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 14.67 14.67 28505 04/04/96 000209 L I M FERTILIZER, INC. PARTS, EQUIP AND REPAIRS 190-180-999-5242 191.31 26505 04/04/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES-TCSD 190-180-999-5242 76.45 28505 04/04/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 7.00 274.76 28@06 04/04/96 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES COMM SRVCS CF/EDWARDS/4/10-12 190-180-999-5258 235.00 235.00 28507 04/04/96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TCSD VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR 190-180-999-5214 68.95 28507 04/04i96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER REPAIR/MAINT. VEHICLE; C.M. 001-110-999-5214 264.88 333.83 28508 04/04/96 LIEBERG, KATIE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28509 04/04/96 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL APR-INTERIM FIRE STATION RENT 001-171-999-5470 600.00 600.00 28510 04/04/96 MARQUETTE, SHIRLEY REFUND-VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00 26511 04/04/96 MAVIS, LILA SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365 28512 04/04/96 MCFALL, NANCY REFUND-WOMEN'S SELF DEFENSE 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00 28513 04/04/96 MILLER, TERI REFUND-YOGA FOR THE 90'S 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00 28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS POOL HEATER REPAIR - CRC 190-180-999-5212 468.21 28514 04/D4i96 002211 MISSION POOLS UNITHERM GOVENOR DISC 190-180-999-5212 355.35 28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS UNITHERM GOVENOR GASKET 190-180-999-5212 9.66 28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS LABOR 190-180-999-5212 60.00 26514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS TAX 190-IaO-999-5212 64.58 957.80 28515 O@1/04/,96 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING IWERG DIRT RD GRADING SANTIAGO 195-180-999-5402 2,445.00 2,445.00 28516 04/04/96 MORGAN, JANA REFUND-YOGA FOR THE 90'S 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00 26@41'@ @,t/04/96 001986 MUSI-CAL AUDIO ENVIRONM PORTABLE EQUALIZER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5610 900.67 900.67 28510' 04/04/96 001713 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. DEC ENG SERVS-LST STR BRIDGE 280-199-807-5802 642.72 642.72 26519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-04/05 001-120-999-5254 42.60 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PA95-02/03 001-120-999-5254 42.60 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/ PA95-0112 001-161-501-5256 27.69 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/PA95-0114 001-161-501-5256 27.69 28@iig 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING- PH-230 001-120-999-5256 27.69 28515 04/'04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0009 001-161-501-5256 32.55 28513 04/04i9b 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-OLD TOWN AMEND 001-120-999-5256 31.69 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/PA95-0133/0134 001-161-501-5256 34.08 26519 04/D4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR-PROP ORDINANCE 001-120-999-5256 18.91 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-PRO ORDINANCE A 001-120-999-5256 12.10 28519 04/041@96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-PW95-15 001-120-999-5256 59.04 28519 041'04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 95-14 001-120-999-5256 23.43 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 aill%4/96 10:31 YOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 95-15 001-120-999-5255 17.38 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE ADOPT BEVEL COD 001-120-999-5256 12.10 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADPT 96-01 001-120-999-5256 18.15 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 96-02 001-120-999-5256 21.21 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0124 001-161-501-5256 28.20 28519 04iG4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR/PA95-0113 001-120-999-5256 34.34 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA96-0027 001-161-501-5256 72.08 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE PA95-0113 001-120-999-5256 11.72 28519 04/04/96 002139 NDRTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-RES. 95-02/03 001-120-999-5254 51.63 28519 04iO4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-DIF STUDY NKSHP 001-120-999-5256 6.82 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0125 001-161-502-5256 28.20 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE-SPEED ON RANCHO 001-120-999-5256 10.22 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADPT 96-03 001-120-999-5256 19.08 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE-SPEED PALA RD 001-120-999-5256 9.88 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES AMENDED PUBLIC DIF WKSHP 3/20 001-120-999-5256 6.82 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-OLD TOWN PRJT 001-120-999-5256 106.32 28519 D4/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-RDA BONDS HOUSE 001-120-999-5256 26.67 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0019 001-120-999-5256 35.70 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /ORDINANCE 95-13 001-120-999-5256 21.04 19 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0024 001-120-999-5256 40.21 9 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR/DUCK POND USTR PLN 001-120-999-5256 34.08 @dbl9 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TINES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0027 001-120-999-5256 32.55 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA96-0013 001-161-501-5256 30.42 285)5 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-25 001-120-999-5256 59.73 2E519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIRES NOTICE ORDINANCE-SPEED PALA RD 001-120-999-5256 16.02 26519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES ORDINANCE ADPT-SPEED RANCHO CA 001-120-999-5256 16.02 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSD 001-120-999-5256 7.81- 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSO 001-120-999-5256 196.70 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSO 001-120-999-5256 56.83- 28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-25 001-120-999-5256 59.73 1,338.45 28521 04/04/96 OBLE, BARBARA REFUND-SILK RIBBON EMBROIDERY 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00 26'02@ 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE PI MAINT TRUCK TIRES 190-003 100-164-601-5214 418.54 28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE TIRES-STENCIL TRUCK 194-022 100-164-601-5214 847.48 26122 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS-MAINT DIVISION 100-164-601-5214 50.80 28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS-LAND DEVEL 001-163-999-5214 62.94 28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE ALIGNMENT MAINT DIV TRUCK 100-164-601-5214 49.95 1,429.71 26523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - GUARD RESCUE 190-183-999-5310 375.00 2652', 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - JUNIOR GUARD 190-183-999-5310 125.00 28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - JUNIOR GUARD 190-183-999-5310 31.25 28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 15.56 28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS TAX 190-183-999-5310 42.38 589.19 t 04/04/96 000248 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 202.30 ,44 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 65.20 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 190-2130 3.34 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 280-2130 1.00 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 13,720.94 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000245 PERS RET 100-2390 2,662.07 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 82.54 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 2,774.08 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 95.64 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 111.05 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 326.05 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 75.17 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 226.21 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 106.83 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 282.54 26524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 119.24 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 349.87 26524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 52.48 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 11.15 28524 04/04/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 .23 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 11.63 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .47 28524 04/04/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .93 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.39 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .23 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .78 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000245 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.09 21,287.77 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 654.64 28526 041'04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 57.49 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 57.49 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 406.00 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 451.66 28525 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA 100-2090 122.47 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.27 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 4,228.62 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 100-2090 924.03 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 RELTHNET 190-2090 1,557.27 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 193-2090 295.00 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.40 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 296.00 26526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHMET 340-2090 381.12 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 1,061.76 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 950.53 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 349.60 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS IHEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 65.24 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 1,419.96 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 963.46 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 305.70 2a526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICH 192-2090 313.54 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 194-2090 101.90 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 2,515.28 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 38.40 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 1,008.65 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 0"44/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 'VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (WEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 101.18 28526 04iO4/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 1,258.70 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 100-2090 78.75 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 112.42 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 44.21 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 44.21 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 001-2090 181.78 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 100-2090 8.37 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHHET 190-2090 41.13 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (WEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.00 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 3.68 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 .04 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 18.75 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 104.32 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 34.77 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS INEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 155.67 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 31.93 2E526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 111.93 28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 2.39 6 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 1,008.65- .E 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 17.05 ed526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE ADMIN ADJUSTMENT FOR APRIL 96 001-150-999-5250 2.54 20,102.65 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:LUCKYS-TCSD CLASS SUPPLI 190-183-999-5320 39.46 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH COMM SKILL CF:R.PREISEND:3/18 001-161-501-5261 41.30 2852'1 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:AMERICAN BATTERY 001-162-999-5214 42.64 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:BATTERY FOR VIDEO CAMERA 100-164-604-5220 43.09 28527 04iO4/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:PMS PRJT-NIGHT WRX 100-164-601-5250 16.08 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:FILM I PHOTO ALBUM 210-190-626-5802 13.95 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:MAINT CREW-PMS PRJT 100-164-601-5260 15.00 26527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB MJM LUNCH UTG 001-110-999-5260 28.73 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:REFRESHMNT SW ALLIANCE 001-110-999-5260 9.00 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:CODE ENFOREMENT SHIRTS 001-162-999-5243 32.32 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:REFRERMNT LIBRARY WTG 001-110-999-5260 8.10 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:M.S.A. UTG REFRESHMNTS 100-164-601-5260 15.00 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:SOUTH 79 CONST MTG 001-110-999-5260 26.00 265217 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:CMBTA OTR UTG :Z.SMITH 001-140-999-5258 18.00 2E5217 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:REFRESHMNT SPRING DANCE 190-180-999-5301 36.33 26521 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:MILEAGE CUBTA MTG:Z.SMTH 001-140-999-5258 46.50 28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR SPRG DANCE 190-180-999-5301 11.45 442.95 2E528 04/04/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-502-5224 13.93 28528 04/04/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-502-5224 13.93 27.86 ;AS29 04/04/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPUENT SCISSOR LIFT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 147.53 147.53 jO 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 001-2340 1,651.24 2853@ 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPW 100-2340 459.32 28530 04/04/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 165-2340 14.59 28530 04/'04/i6 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 190-2340 263.00 28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 280-2340 14.58 YOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 300-2340 14.58 28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 330-2340 22.11 28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 340-2340 72.92 28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA PMT FOR APRIL 96 001-1180 146.78 2,659.12 28531 04/04/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3 001-161-501-5261 123.75 28531 04/04/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3 001-161-502-5261 123.75 28531 04/D4/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:RUIZ:5/1-3 001-161-501-5261 247.50 495.00 28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-RANCHO CAL RD SDWLK 210-155-661-5804 54.40 28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-RANCHO CA CREEK PRJ 210-190-138-5802 244.80 28532 04./04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C TAX 210-190-138-5802 18.97 28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS MISC SUPPLIES-CIP 001-165-999-5222 12.93 331.10 28533 04/04/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS 190-180-999-5212 60.86 60.86 28534 04/04/96 001680 RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE MAR PLAN CHECK SERVS 001-162-999-5248 758.47 758.47 28535 04/04/96 002270 ROADRUNNERS MOBILE MUSI DEPOSIT:96 HOLIDAY RECOG DINNE 001-150-999-5265 200.00 200.00 28536 04/04/95 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST I FEB 96 WALCOTT CORRIDOR SERVS 210-165-637-5802 200.00 200@. 28537 04/04/96 RUGGLES, ERIC SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28538 04/04/96 000397 SAN DIEGO ZOO ADMISSION FOR DAY CAMP KIDS 190-183-999-5350 359.55 359.55 28539 04/04/96 002271 SCHOOL/LAW ENFORCEMENT SCHOL/LAW ENF CF:NAVARRO:4/23 001-170-999-5261 195.00 28539 04/04/96 002271 SCHOOL/LAW ENFORCEMENT SCHOL/LAW ENFOR CF:TAYLOR:4/23 001-170-999-5261 195.00 390.00 2E540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3/96 001-161-501-5261 112.50 28540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3/96 001-161-502-5261 112.50 28540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:RUIZ:5/1-3/96 001-161-501-5261 225.00 450.00 28541 04/04/96 SLANE, STEPHANIE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28542 04/04/96 000645 SMART I FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TEEN EXTRAVAGANZA 190-183-999-5320 194.75 194.75 28543 04/04/96 SMITH, WENDY REFUND-TINY TOTS 190-183-4980 37.00 37.00 2E544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH STREE 190-181-999-5240 745.24 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ST LIGHT METERS 191-180-999-5319 3,505.74 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ST LIGHT METERS 191-180-999-5240 427.81 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL METERS 340-199-999-5240 2,654.03 2E544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5059 TCSO METERS 190-180-999-5240 2,332.19 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5067 IRRG METERS 193-180-999-5240 1,195.85 28544 04/O4i96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6289 STORAGE 340-199-999-5240 103.84 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-502-8077 43200 BUS PRK 340-199-999-5240 298.52 28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-5489 CITY YARD 100-164-601-5240 97.16 11,360.98 28545 04/04/96 001156 SOUTHERN CALIF PUBLIC P AQUATIC TRAINING:J.DENT:4/20 190-183-999-5310 15.00 28545 04/04/96 001156 SOUTHERN CALIF PUBLIC P AQUATIC TRAINING:M.WIKERT:4/20 190-183-999-5310 15.00 30.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 04@114/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28546 04/04/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909 202-4759 TE 001-162-999-5208 61.71 61.71 28547 04/04/96 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES-RECREATION CLASS 190-180-999-5301 30.51 30.51 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 401.45 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 100-2125 63.82 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 92.50 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 18.50 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 11.10 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.53 28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 18.50 510.50 28549 04/04/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC PCKUP AIRPT:R.ROBERTS:LEGUE CF 001-100-999-5258 67.50 28549 04/04/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC DRPOF AIRPT:R.ROBERTS:LEGUE GF 001-100-999-5258 77.50 145.00 28550 04/04/96 001254 TEMECULA STAMP I GRAPHI BUTTONS:SPRING SWING DANCE COM 190-180-999-5301 80.00 28550 04/04/96 001254 TEMECULA STAMP I GRAPHI TAX 190-180-999-5301 6.20 86.20 28551 04/04/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TROPHIES-SEARCH FOR THE STARS 190-183-999-5320 53.88 53.88 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 3,287.01 2do52 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 644.16 28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 68.75 28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 37.50 28552 04/D4i96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 111.33 28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 62.50 4,211.25 2855.'; 04/04/96 000316 THORNHILL, GARY RE-ISSUE CK23819:REIMB A]CP CF 001-161-501-5251 17.50 2855@ 04/D4i96 000316 THORNHILL, GARY RE-ISSUE CK23819:REIMB AICP CF 001-161-502-5261 17.50 35.00 28554 04/04/96 000668 TIMMY 0. PRODUCTIONS TALENT SHOW:MASTER OF CEREMONY 190-183-999-5320 50.00 50.00 2E;55 04/G4/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 203.30 2855-. 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20 2E555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.41 28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00 28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69 28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 203.30- 28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 154.20 2855@, 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32-41 2655;, 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00 28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69 406.60 26556 04/04/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA I ASSOCIATES MAR SPACE PLAN SERVS-CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 725.00 '@aA56 04/04/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA I ASSOCIATES 1ST FLOOR ENTRY/BALCONY DESIGN 210-199-650-5804 675-00 1,400.00 @ -j7 04/04/96 001065 U S C U /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 001-2080 2,650.78 26557 04/04/96 001065 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 100-2080 174.34 28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (DEF, C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 756.70 28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00 28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO IDEF, C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 19.70 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 300-2080 5.00 28557 04/04196 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 312.50 28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 340-2080 87.50 4,011.52 28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 485.40 28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C V /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 89.70 28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 600.02 28556 04/04/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 46.88 28556 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 79.64 28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 45.90 1,347.54 26559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UV 001-2120 67.27 28559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 100-2120 10.93 28559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 190-2120 15.00 28559 04/04/95 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 280-2120 .30 93.50 2E5&0 04/04/@6 001209 VAULT INC., THE 2/15-3/15 RECORDS STORAGE 330-199-999-5277 387.62 387.62 28561 04/04/96 WARKENTINE, ELLEN SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00 28562 04/04/96 001318 WOLFF, MIKE ROOM:PMS PRJT NIGHT INSPECTION 100-164-601-5250 89.44 89, 28563 04/04/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN MEDICAL SUPPLIES NOT INVOICED 340-199-999-5250 13.22 28563 04/04/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 63.68 76.90 TOTAL CHECKS 248,821.97 VouruRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 O" S 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 14,673.18 100 GAS TAX FUND 3,951.39 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 22.64 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 12,532.92 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 71.94 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 8.46 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 170.45 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 20.58 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 1,349.26 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 15,018.79 300 INSURANCE FUND 712.43 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,861.41 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,606.83 340 FACILITIES 613.08 TOTAL 54,613.36 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAr@g: 1 04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28567 04/11/96 001523 A M BEST COMPANY, INC. 96 P/C KEY RATING GUIDE 300-199-999-5228 112.31 112.31 28568 04/11/96 001912 ALLMON, VYLANI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 432.00 432.00 28569 04/11/96 002173 AMERICAN LIGHTING BALLFIELD LIGHT REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 400.00 400.00 28570 04/11/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 233.82 28570 04/11/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 288.79 522.61 28571 04/11/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 2/24 DULL 001-110-999-5118 78.43 78.43 28572 04/11/96 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT, INC. REPAIR AND SERVICE OF TRACTOR 190-180-999-5214 732.70 732.70 28573 04/11/96 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMP REISSUE CK#22414:REFUND G.BOND 001-2670 1,500.00 1,500.00 28574 04/11/96 BAGINGITO, TINA REFUND:BASKETBALL FUNDAMENTALS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 28575 04/11/96 BALUYUT, ROBERTO REFUND:INSTANT PIANO 190-183-4982 30.00 30.00 28576 04/11/96 000623 BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI BALLOONS FOR EASTER EVENTS 190-180-999-5301 160.00 28576 04/11/96 000623 BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI TAX 190-180-999-5301 12.40 172.40 28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I BUSINESS LIC APPLICATION FORMS 001-140-999-5222 299.00 28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 14.75 28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I TAX 001-140-999-5222 23.17 336.92 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INSURANCE 96 CHEVY P/U #9521 300-199-999-5200 371.00 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 001-2370 2,989.99 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 100-2370 1,099.16 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 165-2370 22.64 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 190-2370 1,379.86 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 191-2370 71.94 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 192-2370 8.46 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 193-2370 135.25 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 194-2370 20.58 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 280-2370 74.76 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 300-2370 8.12 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 320-2370 21.50 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 330-2370 9.29 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 340-2370 278.65 28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 001-1182 40.25 6,531.45 28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA IRRIGATION REPAIRS/LOMA LINDA 190-180-999-5415 345.60 28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN 190-180-999-5415 140.00 28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LABOR 190-180-999-5415 64.00 549.60 28580 04111/96 CHOI, SANGWON REFUND:DISNEY ANIMATION 190-183-4982 50.00 50.00 28581 04/11/96 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 526.82 526.82 28582 04/11/96 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. FEB 96 PRKING CITATIONS PROCES 001-140-999-5250 39.00 VOUCRP,E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 01 S 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28582 04/11/96 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. FEB 96 PRKING CITATIONS PROCES 001-170-999-5250 39.00 78.00 28583 04/11/96 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS VETERINARY SERVICES K-9 UNIT 001-170-999-5327 79.32 79.32 28584 04/11/96 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 3/31 COLEMAN 001-110-999-5118 72.24 72.24 28585 04/11/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RE-CYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 26.94 26.94 28586 04/11/96 002283 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL VOORBURG TULIP DED. RECPT 4/28 001-100-999-5280 830.78 830.78 28587 04/11/96 002148 EXPRESS TEL LONG DISTANCE PHONE SERVICES 320-199-999-5208 1,114.77 1,114.77 28588 04/11/96 002175 FIELD, SCOTT F. MAR LEGAL SERVS-HILL VS CITY 300-199-999-5207 221.00 221.00 28589 04/11/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 69.95 28589 04/11/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MISC. MAINT SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 135.45 205.40 28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-695-3539/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 34.64 28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-0128/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,069.32 28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-2309/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 28.56 1,132.52 - 04/11/96 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. 3/28-4/27 MONTHY ACCESS CHRGE 320-199-999-5208 350.00 350.00 2t,y2 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-5234 440.00 28592 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 190-180-999-5234 352.00 28592 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 001-162-999-5234 88.00 880.00 28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 300.00 500.00 28594 04/11/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM FEB PROF SRVCS-PARKVIEW SITE 210-190-626-5804 587.50 28594 04/11/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM CREDIT:INCORRECTLY BILLED 210-190-626-5804 329.00- 258.50 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 16.64 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 40.22 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 12.70 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 231.68 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 174.92 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 31.88 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 444.01 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 28.47 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 84.57 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 94.35 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5220 16.50 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 24.16- 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 30.18- 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 28.21- 28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 16.05- 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 62.24- 1,015.10 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PASF 3 04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28596 04/11/96 002284 GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLANNING GUIDE 001-150-999-5228 22.16 22.16 28597 04/11/96 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH DEVELOPMENT CODE COVERS & TAGS 001-161-501-5222 2,221.81 2,221.81 28598 04/11/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS SEC GUARD SRVCS/3/18-24 210-190-137-5801 526.40 526.40 28599 04/11/96 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 180.00 180.00 28600 04/11/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212 86.18 86.18 28601 04/11/96 001158 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL:A/P WKSHP/ALVARZ/4/17-18 001-140-999-5261 119.40 119.40 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 69.19 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 73.90 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 155.88 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 586.92 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES CREDIT:INCORRECT PART 001-170-999-5214 97.91- 28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 12.09 800.07 28603 04/11/96 000806 HOWARD, BOBBY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 400.00 400.00 28604 04/11/96 000388 I C B 0, INC. BLDG & SAFETY WEEK SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 31.25 - 28605 04/11/96 001377 INLAND EMPIRE MANAGER'S MEMBERSHIP:R. BRADLEY 001-110-999-5226 20.00 2u.uO 28606 04/11/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 99.01 28606 04/11/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 192.19 291.20 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 2.97 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 11.86 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 6.90 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKOIS OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 28.28 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 14.65 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 23.77 28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 37.17 125.60 28608 04/11/96 000488 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM DAYCAMP FIELD TRIP 4/16/96 190-183-999-5350 599.00 599.00 28609 04/11/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 470.80 470.80 28610 04/11/96 001982 L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I EMERGENCY REMOVAL OF 3 TREES 100-164-601-5402 600.00 600.00 28611 04/11/96 002282 LIEBER, CARON TCSD INSTRUCTORS EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 192.00 192.00 28612 04/11/96 000414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM PURCHASE & DEVELOP/TCSD 190-180-999-5250 40.92 40.92 28613 04/11/96 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING COUNCIL MEETING REFRESHMENTS 001-100-999-5260 80.00 80.00 28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 100-164-601-5261 30.00 28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 001-163-999-5261 30.00 28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 100-164-601-5261 30.00 VOUCRRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 oz 5 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28615 04/11/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 SNYDER 190-180-999-5118 574.00 574.00 28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TEM POLICE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS 001-170-999-5222 535.34 28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-170-999-5222 41.49 28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TEM POLICE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS 001-170-999-5222 76.50 28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-170-999-5222 5.93 28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-RICH SOLTYSIAK 001-161-502-5220 110.44 769.70 28617 04/11/96 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI HOOKS-PLAY EQUIP REPLACE PARTS 190-180-999-5212 25.80 28617 04/11196 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212 4.51 28617 04/11/96 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI TAX 190-180-999-5212 2.00 32.31 28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR APR LEASE PMT-INTRM FIRE STATN 001-171-999-5470 905.00 28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR TAX 001-171-999-5470 70.14 28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR APR LEASE PMT-INTRM FIRE STATN 001-171-999-5470 685.00 28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR TAX 001-171-999-5470 53.09 1,713.23 28619 04/11/96 NAY, LLOYD REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28620 04/11/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE/PA96-0001 001-161-501-5256 30.42 28620 04/11/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE/PA96-0018 001-161-501-5256 30.42 60.84 04/11/96 000235 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, IN MAR CREEK RESTORATION BLUEPRNT 210-190-138-5802 516.00 516.00 28622 04/11/96 OLIVIER, SHANLI C. REFUND-RETURN GEN PLANIZON MAP 001-199-4060 50.00 50.00 28623 04/11/96 000667 P A P A CONTINUING ED/STATE PEST LICNS 190-180-999-5261 45.00 45.00 28624 04/11/96 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 408.00 408.00 28625 04/11/96 001707 PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, K-9 FOOD AND SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5327 76.26 76.26 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 56.61 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-PLAN 001-161-501-5224 17.24 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-PLAN 001-161-502-5224 17.24 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 29.50 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 52.07 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 50.56 28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 15.49 238.71 28627 04/11/96 000740 PICCA DELI FLUOR DANIEL MTG-LUNCH 4/12/96 001-110-999-5260 130.92 130.92 28628 04/11/96 002019 PRECISION INTERCONNECT INSTALL CABLE/5 DAT-2 CAT-1 VC 320-199-999-5215 245.00 245.00 28629 04/11/96 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. PUBLICATION:COMPLETE WORD BOOK 001-161-501-5228 18.99 28629 04/11/96 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. PUBLICATION:COMPLETE WORD BOOK 001-161-502-5228 18.98 37.97 28630 04/11/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PARKS 190-180-999-5238 90.54 90.54 1 04/11/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-180-999-5212 121.26 121.26 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGF 5 04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28632 04/11/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT-CIP PRJT PW95-06 210-165-655-5802 24.18 28632 04/11/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT-CIP PRJT PW95-13 210-165-659-5802 24.18 48.36 28633 04/11/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212 63.44 28633 04/11/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY PARKS 190-180-999-5212 46.55 109.99 28634 04/11/96 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET MAR 96 PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 35.00 35.00 28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-RIVERTON 190-180-999-5238 62.89 28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-RANCHO CAL 190-180-999-5238 188.66 28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-NICOLAS RD 190-180-999-5238 172.50 28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-DUCK POND 190-180-999-5238 50.39 474.44 28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RVSD CO. 001-2260 5.00 28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RVSD CO. 001-170-4055 45.00 28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RSVD CO. 001-2260 5.00 28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RSVD CO. 001-170-4055 45.00 100.00 28637 04/11/96 000405 SMITH, PHILLIP I.C.B.C. CERTIFICATION REIMB. 001-162-999-5261 45.00 45.00 28638 04/11/96 SNODDY, LISA R. REFUND-HOME OCCUPATION FEE 001-199-4056 20.00 20.00 28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5836 VIA DEL CORONADO 193-180-999-5240 17.60 28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6073 VIA RIO TMCULA 193-180-999-5240 17.60 28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6420 VIA CORDOBA IRRG 190-180-999-5240 60.40 95.60 28640 04/11/96 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE-B&S VEHICLE-337870 001-162-999-5214 22.49 22.49 28641 04/11/96 001497 T R W,INC.-INFORMATION CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS 280-199-999-5250 50.00 50.00 28642 04/11/96 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION CLASSES SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 35.54 35.54 28643 04/11/96 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES 001-2170 93.20 93.20 28644 04/11/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC SHUTTLE:LEAGUE CF:3/9-11:FORD 001-100-999-5258 67.50 67.50 28645 04/11/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 8 PLAQUES-SPRG SWING DANCE COM 190-180-999-5301 212.97 28645 04/11/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TAX 190-180-999-5301 16.51 229.48 28646 04/11/96 THEODORE, MICHELENE REFUND-AQUATIC PROGRAMS 190-183-4975 75.00 75.00 28647 04/11/96 002286 THERMAL INDUSTRIES INC HEALTH ZONE LOAN-THERMAL INDUS 280-1520 9,263.50 9,263.50 28648 04/11/96 000668 TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS SOUND SYSTEM - EASTER EGG HUNT 190-182-999-5239 100.00 100.00 28649 04/11/96 002111 TOGO'S CATERING SERVS-TEAM BUILD-B&S 001-162-999-5261 75.55 75.55 28650 04/11/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PW ADMIN 100-164-604-5220 151.73 28650 04/11/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CIP 001-165-999-5220 45.28 197.01 28651 04/11/96 001890 VORTEX DOORS REMOTE UNLOCKING GATE-CRC 190-182-999-5212 998.00 9@ VOUrHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 0 6 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CREDIT:RETURNED SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 45.20- 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 54.82 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CREDIT:RETURNED SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 454.27- 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY HALL BLDG MAINT. SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 49.46 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 732.51 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY HALL BLDG MAINT. SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 180.55 28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 53.82 571.69 28653 04/11/96 001867 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, I REMOVAL OF ONE TREE & STUMP 100-164-601-5402 150.00 150.00 28654 04/11/96 002130 WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-CITYWIDE PCC REPAIRS 280-2035 3,895.10 3,895.10 28655 04/11/96 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CA CODE PUBLICATIONS/CITY HALL 001-120-999-5228 125.00 125.00 28656 04/11/96 002253 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY, T INSTALL FENCE @ NAKAYAMA PRK 190-180-999-5212 2,250.00 2,250.00 28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH FAST TRACK FLYER-DESIGN & LYUT 280-199-999-5270 129.30 28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH L.A. BUSINESS JRNL AD LAYOUT 280-199-999-5270 536.38 28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH SAN DIEGAN AD-DESIGN & LAYOUT 280-199-999-5270 638.75 28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH BALLOON & WINE AD-DESIGN/LAYUT 280-199-999-5270 431.00 1,735.43 - 04/11/96 001318 WOLFF, MIKE ROOM:P.M.S. PUBLIC WORKS PRJT 100-164-601-5250 136.08 136.08 20068 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAR MAINT CONTRACT COPIER 5012 330-199-999-5217 53.75 28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE CHRGE-PUBLIC WRKS 330-199-999-5217 301.14 28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 12/28 - 3/27 METER USAGE-5100A 330-199-999-5239 1,242.65 28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TONER CARTRIDGE-CRC COPIER 190-182-999-5220 112.00 28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 190-182-999-5220 8.68 1,718.22 28669 04/11/96 YONTZ, HEIDI REFUND-PARKING CITATION #11100 001-2260 5.00 28669 04/11/96 YONTZ, HEIDI REFUND-PARKING CITATION #11100 001-170-4055 45.00 50.00 28670 04/11/96 001918 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. REPLACE CROSS BARS/STENCIL TRK 100-164-601-5218 890.80 28670 04/11/96 001918 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 69.04 959.84 TOTAL CHECKS 54,613.36 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 04/11/96 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 27,400.97 100 GAS TAX FUND 14,199.00 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 4,468.85 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 40,738.48 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 815.58 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 81,828.29 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 125,036.45 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,204.58 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,202.41 340 FACILITIES 490.00 TOTAL 298,384.61 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 0 6 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMDUNT AMOUNT 28673 04/23/96 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. 2000 LBS -TEMP ASPHALT REPAIRS 100-164-601-5218 1,556.80 28673 04/23/96 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 120.65 1,677.45 28674 04/23/96 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT DESIGN OF SIXTH STREET PARKING 280-199-804-5802 8,047.50 8,047.50 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV/SENIOR CENTER 190-180-999-5415 1,815.30 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV/C.R.C. 190-180-999-5415 1,954.70 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/PARKS 190-180-999-5415 13,547.61 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/SEN CENTER 190-181-999-5415 242.52 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/CRC 190-182-999-5415 1,670.81 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 815.58 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/NICDLAS PRK 190-180-999-5415 1,015.00 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/DUCK POND 190-180-999-5415 1,445.00 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/PALA PARK 190-180-999-5415 2,336.00 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/CITY HALL 340-199-999-5415 490.00 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LAND. MAINT/BUTTERFIELD STAGE 190-180-999-5415 977.60 28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROVEMENTS/VETERANS PRK 190-180-999-5415 1,059.56 27,369.68 28676 04/23/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. 12/02/94 INMAN, JENNIFER 300-199-999-5205 1,204.58 1,204.58 28677 04/23/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PHASE 1 ENVIRO/WINCHESTER PRK 210-190-149-5802 1,800.00 1,800.00 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY C.R.C. EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM 190-182-999-5212 900.00 e.@-(8 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY LABOR 190-182-999-5212 350.00 28678 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 60.00 28678 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY TAX 190-182-999-5212 69.75 1,379.75 28679 04/23/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, PGRSS PMT #3 FIRE STATION #84 210-190-626-5804 61,427.69 28679 04/23/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RETENTION:PMT #3 FIRE STATION 210-2035 6,142.76- 55,284.93 28680 04/23/96 000520 H D L COREN & CONE, INC 95/96 PROPERTY TAX SRVCS 001-140-999-5248 2,400.00 2,400.00 28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 1,000.00 28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 1,000.00 28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 269.86 2,269.86 28682 04/23/96 001979 INLAND PAINTING CRC POOL IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 3,700.00 3,700.00 28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES P/C SERVCS/WESTERN BY-PASS 210-165-612-5802 1,037.50 28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES PLAN CHECK SRVCS LAND DEV 001-163-999-5249 1,387.50 28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES WORKERS COMP:INVOICE #96.06 001-1182 12.13- 2,412.87 28684 04/23/96 000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, FEB PROF SRVCS/WINCH BRIDGE 280-199-602-5804 1,325.50 1,325.50 28685 04/23/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION MAR PRGSS PMT-SAM HICK PRK 280-199-805-5804 60,489.79 28685 04/23/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-MAR PMT SAM HICK PRK 280-2035 6,048.97- 54,440.82 28686 04/23/96 002052 MAPLES & ASSOCIATES ASPHALT WORK-COMMERCE CNTR DR. 100-164-601-5402 12,521.55 12,521.55 - 11 04/23/96 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS 190-183-999-5380 1,247.40 1,247.40 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/11/96 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28688 04/23/96 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES APRIL-JUNE 96 CSD ADMIN SERVS 190-180-999-5370 4,583.37 4,583.37 28689 04/23/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB PROF RDA CONSULTING SERVS 280-199-999-5248 4,468.86 28689 04/23/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB PROF RDA CONSULTING SERVS 165-199-999-5248 4,468.85 8,937.71 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT 2-RAIL RECYCLED FENCE/DUCK PND 210-190-143-5804 8,725.08 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT 16' DOUBLE GATE/DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 300.00 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT ONE 4'GATE & TEN 6X6 POST/POND 210-190-143-5804 501.60 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT LABOR TO INSTALL FENCE/DUCK PN 210-190-143-5804 9,993.62 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT TAX 210-190-143-5804 738.32 28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT CREDIT MEMO-MINUS ONE 4' GATE 210-190-143-5804 107.76- 20,150.86 28691 04/23/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S DEC 95 LAW ENFORC BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 9,825.60 28691 04/23/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS JAN 96 BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 13,800.00 23,625.60 28692 04/23/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAR 96 PRGSS PMT-WINCH & 1-15 280-199-602-5804 63,059.75 28692 04/23/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-MAR PGSS WINCH & 115 280-2035 6,305.98- 56,753.77 28693 04/23/96 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & ENG SERVS-CREEK PATHWAY PRJT 210-190-138-5802 2,500.00 2,500.00 28694 04/23/96 002021 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI MAR RESTROOM MAINT SERVS PRKS 190-180-999-5250 1,494.00 1,494.00 28695 04/23/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES MAR DESIGN SERVS-NEW CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 1,055.00 1,( 28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 DEVELOPER 330-199-999-5220 558.00 28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 TONER 330-199-999-5220 196.00 28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 TONER 330-199-999-5220 1,290.00 28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 330-199-999-5220 158.41 2,202.41 TOTAL CHECKS 298,384.61 0 ITEIN4 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRE TOR OF FIN4NCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:April 23,1996 SUBJECT:City Attorney Services PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION:That City Council approve the following: 1. Retain Peter Thorson as City Attorney for City of Temecula; 2.Terminate the Agreement for City Attorney Services with Burke, Williams, & Sorensen Attorneys dated September 26, 1996; and 3.Enter into an Agreement for City Attorney Services with Rlchards, Watson and Gershon Attorneys at Law per the attached Agreement. BACKGROUND: The City has retained Burke, Williams and Sorensen (BWS) for City Attorney services since 1989, with Peter Thorson serving as Temecula City Attorney since May 10, 1994. On March 27, 1996, Mr. Thorson resigned as Partner and Head of the Public Law Division at Burke, Williams and Sorenson to accept a position at Richards, Watson & Gershon Attorneys at Law. As a firm, Richards, Watson & Gershon currently serve as City Attorney for twenty-three cities in Southern California, and as special counsel to forty cities and eighteen redevelopment districts throughout California. By contracting with Richards, Watson, & Gershon, the City will not only benefit from Mr. Thorson's experience with Temecula and his local government expertise, but would also continue to be afforded the services of a large, full-service law firm. The areas of specialization for this firm include litigation, insurance, real estate, environmental, business, public finance, and redevelopment law. Based on the outstanding service provided to the City by Mr. Thorson, staff recommends that Mr. Thorson be retained as Temecula City Attorney through an agreement with Richards, Watson and Gershon. The terms of this agreement are identical to the current contract with Burke, Williams and Sorensen (see Attachment). R:\KUHNSAIA7rYAGMTAGN FISCAL IMPACT: services at the base/retainer rates and hours negotiated in the September 1995 Agreement with BWS. All other attorney services will be provided at the then current hourly rate of the attorney performing the services. These rates are subject to the approval of the City Manager. Attachment The City would continue to receive City Attorney/Assistant City Attorney R \KUHNSA\ATrYAGMT.AGN AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF TENECULA, a General Law City (hereinafter "City") and the law firm of Richards, Watson & Gershon Attorneys at Law, a professional corporation (hereinafter "RWG"), shall be dated as of April 24, 1996. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts: A. City has heretofore engaged the services of RWG to act as the City Attorney for City and to perform all legal services which are needed by the City; and B. It is the desire of the parties hereto to formalize, by means of this Agreement, their relationship pertaining to the performance of such legal services; and C. RWG has agreed to provide such legal services, in the time, manner, and for the compensation, as hereinafter set forth; and D. That City Council of City has heretofore determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the execution of this Agreement. SECTION 2. LEGAL SERVICES. RWG shall perform the legal services necessary to serve the City which shall include, but are not limited, to the following: A. The designated City Attorney shall attend all meetings of the City Council unless excused by the City Manager and the designated Assistant City Attorney shall attend all Planning Conunission Meetin s unless excused by the City Manager- and 9 B. Provide legal counsel at such other meetings of boards, commissions and committees of the City as directed by the City Council or City Manager; and C. Provide legal advice and opinions on all matters affecting the City when requested by the City Council, City Manager, Department Head, or a designated City representative, and represent the City in administrative proceedings and litigation involving the City which may an'se from those matters upon which such advice has been given; and D. Prepare and approve as to legal form all resolutions, ordinances, contracts, agreements and other legal documents and represent the City in adnu'nistrative proceedings and litigation involving the City which may arise from those matters upon which such advice has been given; and E. Undertake civil and criminal prosecution of violations of City ordinances when requested to do so by the City Council or City Manager; and F. Represent the City in administrative proceedings and civil or criminal litigation to which the City is a party; and G. Provide legal advice and opinions on all financial matters affecting the City when requested by the City Council, City Manager, or a Department Director, and represent the City as bond counsel in the issuance of bonds or other financial transactions involving the City. RWG shall not be required to perform the services described above where to do so would be a conflict of interest pursuant to the State Bar Act. When requested by the City Manager or his designated representative, and in all litigation matters, RWG shall provide City with an estimate of the costs of litigation or other services to be provided. The City Council shall retain the right to direct that attorneys other than RWG perform legal work for the City. SECTION 3. DESIGNATION OF CITY ATTORNEY. PETER M. THORSON of Richards, Watson & Gershon Attorneys at Law shall be appointed City Attorney of City. The Assistant City Attorney shall be appointed within five (5) working days of execution of this Agreement. Such appointees shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council of City and may be changed by Council action without amending this Agreement. Such appointees shall have the authority vested in city attorneys by the applicable laws of the State of California. The designated City Attorney shall be responsible for performing or causing to be performed the work described in Section 2 of this Agreement. SECTION 4. COMPENSATION. RWG shall be compensated by City for the performance of such services as follows-. A. Basic Retainer. RWG shall be compensated for the performance of basic retainer services pursuant to this Agreement in the amount of Four Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500) per calendar month commencing as of the effective date of this Agreement. Basic retainer services for the purposes of this AYreement shall be deemed to be the first fifty (50) hours of City Attorney or Assistant City Attorney legal services rendered each month. 2 B. Additional Services. RWG shall be compensated for additional retainer services in accordance with the following: I .Performing of Services by Designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney. For all time spent by the designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney in excess of fifty (50) hours per calendar month, RWG shall be compensated on an hourly basis of one hundred fifteen dollars ($115) and one hundred twenty-five dollars ($125) per hour, respectively, for all time so spent. The hourly rates of the designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney, exclusive of the basic retainer services may be increased or decreased as of each July I st occurring during the term of this Agreement, commencing on July 1, 1997, by an amount approved by the City Council as an amendment to this Agreement. 2.Legal Services Provided by Attorneys Other Than Designated City Attorney or Assistant City Attorney. RWG shall be compensated for the performance of legal services by attorneys other than the designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney at the then current hourly rate of the attorney performing such service, except for bond and financial work, upon approval of City Manager. On or before March I st of each year occurring during the term of this Ac,reement, RWG shall submit to the City Manager for review and approval a Est of the hourly rates of all attorneys available to perform services for the City and the hourly rates therefor which 'II be effective commencing on each said July I st through and including June 'Oth of the wi 1 following calendar year. The City Attorney shall use his/her best efforts to keep the City Mana-er and/or appropriate City staff advised as to the attorneys performing work on matters for the City. The City Attorney shall endeavor to lin-tit legal expenses by utilizing associates or paralegals where appropriate. Legal Services for Bond and Financial Matters. RWG shall be compensated for bond matters in such amounts as are reasonable and customary for bond counsel in the public sector. Furthermore, RWG shall not proceed with such work until the City Council approves, in its sole discretion, the compensation and authorizes the work to proceed. 4. RWG shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by it in the performance of legal services hereto, provided that the same are first approved by the City Manager. Reimbursable expenses to which RWG shall be entitled shall include, but not be limited to, duplication costs; word processing costs-, mileage to meetings in Riverside County in amounts as authorized for other City officers or employees- telephone and telecommunications costs; extraordinary mail costs; messenger service; and other costs R:@KT-THNSA\AT7YAGMT.DOC 3 customarily made as a part of the performance of legal services by RWG'M such amounts as approved by the City Manager. AU reimbursable expenses will be billed to the Citv at their actual costs without any mark-up for RWG overhead. The designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney shall be entitled to reimbursement for the cost of attending professional conferences and seminars as approved by the City Manager. Any out of town travel must be approved in advance. Unless otherwise agreed to in advance, time spent away from home or office which is not in transit or spent performing legal services should not be compensated. Air travel, unless otherwise agreed in advance, shall be reimbursed at the coach rate. Extraordinary expenses including without limitation expenses resulting from the retention of experts, shall be incurred only after consultation with the City. 5. Advancement of Costs. RWG will advance individual cost items not exceeding $500 incurred on behalf of the City. Individual cost items in excess of $500 shall be paid directly by the City or shall be advanced to RWG pursuant to a separate letter agreement which the City Manager is authorized to execute on behalf of the City. 6. Payment for Services. RWG shall submit monthly statements to the City accounting for all services 'ded and costs incurred pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Said statements shall clearly prove set forth by date the type of work performed, the time spent on a task, in tenth of an hour increments, the attorney performing the task, and the attomey's hourly rate. Payment to RWG shall be made by City within thirty (30) days of receipt of the statement, except for those specific items on the billing which are contested or questioned and returned by City, with written explanation, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the statement. RWG shall provide to City a written response to any statement contested or questioned and fiirther, upon request of City, 'de City with any and all documents related to the service or costs. No charge shall be made provi for time expended in providing this information to the City. SECTION 5. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall commence on May 1, 1996, and shall continue thereafter unless terminated by either party hereto pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. City may terminate this Agreement at any time, however City will endeavor to give RWG thirty (3 0) days written notice prior to termination. RWG may terminate on the giving of thirty (3 0) days written notice to the City of such termination. RWG will comply with all obligations required of it pursuant to the State Bar Act in connection with such terrra'nation and the transition to replacement counsel. RWG shall be compensated for its services rendered through and including the effective date of such termination. R:@KUHNSA@T7YAGMT.DOC 4 SECTION 6. NOTICES. Notices required pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by personal service upon the party to be notified, or by delivery of same to the custody of the United States Postal Service, or its lawfw successor, postage prepared and addressed as follows- CITY:City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 RWG:Richards, Watson & Gershon Thirty-eighth Floor 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-1469 Attn: Managing Partner Service of a notice by personal service shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of such personal service. Notices given by deposit with the United States Postal Service shall be deemed to have been given two (2) consecutive business days following the deposit of the same in the custody of said Postal Service. Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified. SECTION 7. INDEMNIEFICATION. RWG does hereby agree to defend, indemnify, protect and hold City, and its elected and appointed officers and officials, employees and other agents free and harrniess from any claim, demand or judgment which may arise based upon personal injury or damage to property to a third party arising out of the performance of services bv RWG hereto. SECTION 8. INSURANCE. Not in derogation of the provisions of Section 7 hereof, RWG does hereby agree to take out and maintain in full force and effect under the terms of this Agreement the following insurance coverage: A. Such insurance coverage as is required pursuant to the Workers' Compensation Laws of the State of California; and B.A liability policy with coverage of not less than $ 1, 000, 000 and c Professional Liability (errors and omissions) in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. P, \KUHNSAA7rYAGMT DOC 5 SECTION 9. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A.Status reports respecting litigation matters shall be provided in accordance with the City'slitigation guidelines. The reports should include all relevant information and note any changes inpersonnel working on the case. B. RWG shall not assign this Agreement, or any of the rights, duties, or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that RWG is uru'quely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement. C. RWG is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, servants, or agents shall have control over the conduct of RWG or any of RWG's officers, employees, or agents. RWG shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner employees of the City. City acknowledges and agrees that the City Attorney, Assistant City Attorney, and attorneys representing the City will need to represent to others their capacity and relationship to the City. D. In the perfon-nance of this Agreement, RWG shall not engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of the age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry, or relicion of such persons. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed, or represented by the City or RWG to any third person to create the relationship of principal or agent, of a partnership, of a joint venture, or of any other association of any kind or nature between the City and RWG. F. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of parties concerning the subject matter hereof, and, all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. G. Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, It is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. H. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not sinu'lar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. R'\KUHNSA\A'17YAGMT-DOC 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their representatives as follows: CITY OF TEMECULA, a General Law City By KAREL LINDE@S MAYOR ATTEST: @ S. GREEK CITY CLERK RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON, A Professional Corporation By GREGORY W. STEPANICICH Chairman of the Board R'kKt,@SA\ATTYAGM'r.DOC 7 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON HOURLY RATES FOR TEMECULA Watson 190 Bagneris 175 Gershon 190 Susskind 175 Argue 190 Ceccon 175 Lamken 190 Weaver 175 Simon 190 Kaufinann 175 Adler 190 Gans 175 Pieper 190 Ennis 175 Rennett 190 Harris, R. 175 Dorsey 190 Estrada 175 Strauss 190 Wiener 175 Drewry 190 Dilkes 175 Abbott 190 Orr 175 Neufeld 190 Hakman 175 Stepanicich 190 Shintani 175 Browne 190 Rudell 165 Stern 190 Colantuono 165 Jenkins 190 Kim 165 Kramer 190 Weiner 165 Harris, J. 190 Asamura 165 Barrow 185 Sume 165 Lynch 185 Rabin 185 Kunert 185 4th Year Associate 155 Jimbo 185 3rd Year Associate 145 2nd Year Associate 135 1 st Year Associate 125 NOTE - Associate year changes on January I st of each year corresponding to Bar admissions. ITEIN4 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORI I OR Of CITY MANAC CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Purchase of Radio System Equipment RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of City Radio Equipment from Comtronix of Hemet for a total cost of $1 7,265.37. BACKGROUND: In 1992, the City purchased a 800 megahertz radio system for approximately $50,000. This radio system was designed by Riverside County Fire and provided the City with a needed communication link for not only daily operations, but also emergency communications. At that time, the City was informed that we would not bb able to license our own communications frequency through the FCC because all local government frequencies were being utilized. Therefore, the City was required to "rent" airtime with a commercial provider. This arrangement has served our needs adequately; however, we recently began to experience some problems with users having delays in gaining access to the system. These delays prompted a series of meetings between staff, Riverside County Fire, and the vendor who has served us since 1992. As a result of these meetings, we discovered that some of these problems are present because we rent airspace on a commercial system and the new owners of this system are slowly shutting down access to customers of this system unless these customers purchase new radio equipment that the owners of the system provide. To date, we have not been notified that we would be "shut out", but we understand that this notice could be coming in the near future. In order to not only protect our investment in the City's radio equipment, but improve the level of service that employees receive from this equipment, staff entered into a contract with a reputable radio system engineer, Jerry Campbell of Diversified Communications, who is an expert in public safety communication systems. Mr. Campbell provided us with a comprehensive report, at a cost of $5,400, that identified a frequency that the City could license for our exclusive use. By having its own frequency, the City would be able to control its own system and avoid having to purchase new equipment to remain with a commercial vendor. In addition to owning its own system, the R:\LANIER DA,REPORT%STAFF30.MIS City would save money by being able to avoid the monthly rental air time charge currently at approximately $1 1,000 annually. Mr. Campbell has submitted an application to the FCC to license one primary and one backup frequency (to be activated when future system growth warrants it) for Temecula. We were very fortunate to locate this frequency because public safety frequencies, in Southern California, are extremely difficult to obtain. The frequency that we will have local control of is also shared by the cities of Anaheim and West Covina. However, because Temecula is geographically separated from these areas by mountains, this will not cause any operational problems. In order for us to utilize this frequency, we will need to purchase radio repeater equipment. The engineering report identified the KRTM Radio Station repeater site, located in the hills just Southwest of the City limits, as the location that would provide the best radio coverage in Temecula. This equipment will be set up at that location and will be operational once we receive FCC licensing approval, estimated to be within 90 days. Staff has been in contact with KRTM and have received approval to locate our equipment at this location. However, before this equipment is placed at the KRTM site, we will need to enter into a ground lease agreement with KRTM, which is being worked on. This lease can not be finalized at this time because KRTM is in escrow, scheduled to close in 30 days, for this property. However, staff is confident that this lease will end up being at a nominal cost to the City. Finally, if this ground lease negotiation does become difficult, the engineering report did identify several other locations in the City where a repeater site could be located. Every successful communication system has back-ups built in. Therefore, the upcoming fiscal year budget will include funds to place a back-up repeater at the Parkview Fire Station. This location was also identified as providing excellent radio coverage throughout the City. The total cost of this purchase , including delivery and installation is $1 7,265.37. The vendor, Comtronix of Hemet, has been the City's supplier/vendor, following a competitive selection process, of radio equipment since 1 992. In addition, this vendor is Riverside County Fire's supplier, awarded following a competitive selection process, and they guaranteed the City the same pricing structure as they provide the County. Comtronix has also agreed not to charge the City a fee for reprogramming all existing equipment once we move to our own frequency. Finally, Comtronix has spent a significant amount of time, at no cost to us, to arrive at this plan. Staff recommends awarding of this bid to Comtronix. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase were included in the Mid-Year Budget and are available in account number 320-1950. Attachments:Comtronix Quote Letter of Support, Riverside County Fire R\LANIEELDA\KEPOR'nSTAFF30.MIS COMTRONIX OF HEMET LAND MOBILE RADIO SALES & SERVICE Rlz@r7-ilIED 3501 Tanya Ave. Suite H APR 3 1996 Hemet, Ca. 92545 909-925-7539 909-925-8306 FAX April 1, 1996 City of Temecula Attn: Mr. Grant Yates 431 74 Business Park Circle Temecula, Ca. 92590-6606 Dear Grant After working with your engineer Jerry Campbell on site evaluation and testing, I am pleased to quote the following for a new 800 Mhz repeater system. Comtronix of Hemet has been selected by the County of Riverside Fire Department to supply Kenwood Radio equipment and the City of Temecula is being offered the same pricing as Riverside County Fire. Kenwood TKR-900, 800 Mhz, 40 watt repeater. Unit is housed in a 32" locking cabinet, with power supply, community tone panel, power failure alarm, battery backup input and duplexer. 12,218.98 Battery backup system with gel batteries, charger and auto power changeover. 746.00 Celwave PD-1 109, 7.5 db gain antenna and 50' low loss cable assy with all necessary cables, connectors and mounting hardware. 2,278.98 Total Merchandise 1,5243.96 Sales Tax @ 7.75% 1,181.41 Installation Labor 840.00 Total Installed price 17,265.37 This quote is good until May 1, 1 996 Delivery is approx 4 weeks ARO Terms:Net 30 from Invoice date Warranty: 2 years Parts and Labor Sincerely, C/@ /@ Fred L. Parker temecl O.wps Riverside County Fire Department APR 4 l@096 in cooperation with the California Department Of Forestry and Fire Protection @UMAN HESUUH(,ES MEMORANDUM To:Grant Yates Date: 4-1-96 City Of Temecula From:J.M. HARRIS, Chief Riverside County Fire Department Subject:New City Radio System We have reviewed the attached proposal and costs concerning the radio system for the City. We concur with both the engineering and purchases proposed. You asked if we were comfortable with Comtronix as the vendor and equipment needed, we are on both accounts. As a side note, Comtronix has an open PO with this Department for service in the mobile radio field. We do buy Kenwood products from this dealer and are satisfied with the discounts offered and level of repair. Comtronix is a dealer and repair facility for several public safety agencies, State, County, and local government. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. I can be reached at 909 940-6940. Mike Burton 'Communications Manager ITEA4 6 APPRO CITY ATTOF FINANCE DI! CITY MANAGER)-,," CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Manager/City Council FROM:City Clerk DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION:Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details Accounts Payable 91-92 GTE through Z and Accounts Payable 92-93 A to Par (Retention Code 40106). These records have been microfilmed in duplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibits "A' as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS:Destruction of Records Request List of Records recommended for destruction JSG TO:City Clerk F'ROM:Paula Sargent Office Technician DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of. Accounts Payable 91-92 GTE to Z (Retention Code 40106), and Accotmts Payable 92-93 A to Par (Retention Code 40106) . @ records have been micro in duplicate with a copy distributed to @ City Clerk's @rds Vault, the Fmance Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The micro of these records complies with the requirements of Govermnent Code Section 34090.5. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, 1 hereby give my consent to @ destruction of records under dx dir@on of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. ..... ..... .. .. .. ..... APPROVED., .. ...... ........ ........... artment ....... ...... . ............ ........ ... .. I.., . ...................... ... ..... .. ... ............ .. ..... ... ......... .. ............ ..... ... ........ ... . ... ........... . ..... .... @Tbort ............... . ... .. .............. .... .. .. .............. ..... .. .. ... .. ... Date, R:\forms\dcxuuct.rqs RRDESTY ... RRO61 City of TemecuLs Doc. *of................................................................................................. 140 P W 1 04/11/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code............................................................................................... 40106 14:24:49 Destruction Date. 04/23/1996 Item Ret. File Refereme Storaoe NW!a DateRef. Brief Description Code Security Close Stor&W Location Location Reforeme -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/11/1991 91-92 Accounts PayabLe 91-92 40106 0092 Film 3B2lNlAOOO3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/01/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0092 Film 3a2lMlAOOO3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/02/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0093 Film 3a2lNlADW3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/03/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0094 Film 382lNlAODO3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/04/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 009S Film 382INlAO003 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/05/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0096 Film 382INIAO003 Group IV 140/120/The Vault 6 Records Processed EIN4 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORI FINANCE DIR CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Accept the Offers of Dedication for Public Street and Utility Purposes along the Walcott Corridor PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION:City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES BACKGROUND: The Walcott Corridor project is designed to improve several roads in a relatively undeveloped portion of the City. Prior to incorporation by the City, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved several Parcel Maps adjacent to the Walcott Corridor Project. The property owners provided offers of dedication for public street and utility purposes but were not accepted. In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66477.2 the offers of dedication remain open until the legislative body, by resolution at any time and without further action by the subdivider, rescinds its action and accepts the right-of-way. Upon completion of the improvements these roads will be accepted into the maintained road system. The City Attorney's office has review these offers of dedications as to form. The following offers of dedication (see Exhibit 'B' for locations) for public streets and utility purposes are recommended for acceptance: NICOLAS ROAD: 1 Lots "D', "E' and "F" per PM 37/37-38. 1 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas CALLE GIRASOL: 1The street shown as the westerly 33 feet of Parcel 4 per PM 1 /44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records. 2)Lot "A' per PM 87/60. 3)The street shown as the southerly and southwesterly 33 feet of Parcel 23 per PM 1/44-46as offered for dedication bydocument recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 1 1 901 6 of Official Records; except portion included in PM 87/60. 4)Lot 'Du and the southwesterly 30 feet of Lot "En per PM 73/85-86. 5)Lot "B" per PM 23/27 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except portion included in PM 73/85-86 and PM 73/41-42. 6)Lot "A" per PM 73/41-42. 7)The street shown as the northeasterly 33 feet of Parcels 2 and 3 per PM 1 7/21 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 1 1 901 6 of Official Records. CALLE CHAPOS: 1 )The westerly 48 feet of Lot "E" per PM 67/45. 2)Lot "A" per PM 26/97-98. WALCOTTLANE: 1 )Lots "B" and "C" per PM 75/22-23. 2)Lots "A" and "B' per PM 27/16-17. 3)Lots "A' and "B" per PM 31/43. 4)Lots "A", "B", "C" and "D" per PM 58/49. 5)The street shown as the northerly 33 feet of Parcel 14 per PM 1/44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records. 6) Lot "A" per PM 36/43. 2 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibit "An, inclusive. 3 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPNNG THE 0 OF DEDICATION FOR PUBIJC STREET AND UTLLITY PURPOSES THE CrrY COUNC]IL OF THE CrrY OF ULA DOES RESOLVE, DEI AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: , 'Ihe County of Riverside was offered dedication as shown on attached hereto Exhibit "A" for public street and utility purposes but the offers of dedication were not accepted at the time of map recordation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accept the offers of dedication for public street and utility purposes for those streets or portions of streets offered to and not accepted by the County of Riverside as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOffM, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23th day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor AT=T: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF PJVERSIDE ss CrrY OF TEMIP-CULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califon-tia, do hereby ce@ that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23th day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCI]LUMMEBERS: NOES: 0 COUNC]ILMEMEBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCIILMEMEBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEM13ERS: EXHI]BIT "Am TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- Pursuant to Section 66477.2 of the Subdivision Map Act the City of Temecula does hereby accepting the offers of dedication for public street purposes of those portions of the streets listed below as said offer was expressed on said maps or as referenced thereon by separate document. A)Lots "B" and "C" per PM 75/22-23. B)Lots 'A" and 'B" per PM 27/16-17. C)Lots 'A" and "B" per PM 31/43. D)I-ots "A", 'IB", C" and "D" per PM 58/49. E)The street shown as the westerly 33 feet of Parcel 4 per PM 1/44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records. F)The westerly 48 feet of Lot "E" per PM 67/45. G)Lot "A" per PM 26/97-98. H)Lot "A" per PM 87/60. 1)The street shown as the southerly and southwesterly 33 feet of Parcel 23 per PM 1/44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except portion included in PM 87/60. J)The street shown as the northerly 33 feet of Parcel 14 per PM 1/44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records. K)Lot "A" per PM 36/43. L)Lot "D" and the southwesterly 30 feet of Lot "E' per PM 73/85-86. M)Lots "D", "E" and "F" per PM 37/37-38. N)Lot "B" per PM 23/27 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except portion included in PM 73/85-86 and PM 73/41-42. 0)Lot "A' per PM 73/41-42. P)The street shown as the northeasterly 33 feet of Parcels 2 and 3 per PM 17/21 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records. PROJECT NO. PM 94-10 "ICOL, CITY OF TEMECULA WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS E4 INDEX MAP SCALE I' 300 10. Z,3?09 L I"e LEGEND Proposed dedication '-'14C, Existing dedication EXHIBIrl" "B" .ITEIA 8 I APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Sewer Agreement with Mervyn's for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1.Approve the Agreement and Grant of Easement, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents. BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the project, the City received a sewer agreement for the sewer line relocation for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 from Mervyn's a California Corporation. This sewer agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the relocation of the sewer which is included in the project. Approximately 170 linear feet of the existing 15' V.C.P. sewer main and 850 linear feet of existing 8" V.C.P. which are located within existing easements, will be abandoned. The contractor will construct approximately 850 linear feet of new line in the new location which is about 100 feet east of the new loop on-ramp in an easement on a portion of the Mervyn's and Palm Plaza parking area. The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed on Mervyn's property and the City's responsibilities during construction. The City's contractor will construct the new line within the easement acquired by the City. The City will also convey the new sewer line facilities to Eastern Municipal Water District through a Grant Easement (see Exhibit 'B"). The District will inspect the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. -I- r\agdrpt\96\0423\pw94-2l.agr/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is required for this project. ATTACHMENTSO Sewer Agreement and Grant of Easement. -2- r:\agdrpt\96\0423@2l.agr/ajp Recording Requested By and when Recorded Return to: CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attn:Steven Beswick This Document Must Be Signed in the Presence of Notary & Notarized. NO Recording Fee Required Pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT (this "Agreement") is made this 8th day of April, 1996, by and between MERVYNIS, a California corporation (hereinafter "Grantor") and THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a general law city (hereinafter "Grantee") RECITALS A. Grantee, in order to improve the sewage transmission and treatment system serving Grantor's property hereinafter described and other properties, wishes to implement, construct and maintain certain underground sewage transmission and collection facilities. As part of this process, Grantee intends to construct a public improvement in the form of underground sewage transmission and collection facilities under a portion of Grantor's real property commonly known as 26443 Ynez Road, Temecula, California, Assessor's Parcel Number 910-130-044 ("Grantor's property") and has requested that Grantor grant an easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of such sewage facilities through and under a portion of Grantor's property, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein. B. Grantor is desirous of cooperating with the Grantee's plans and programs to improve the said sewage transmission system and Grantor is agreeable to granting an easement to the Grantee, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non-exclusive easement thirty (30) feet in width (the "Easement") in, upon, along, under, over, and across that certain property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area") for purposes of exercising the rights granted herein. The Easement and right of access granted herein shall be subject to (i) the rights of Grantor, and its successors, heirs and assigns to use the Easement Area as permitted herein and (ii) all other easements and encumbrances of record. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, it is understood and agreed that this Grant of Easement shall not be construed as a grant of fee title. 2. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS RIGHTS. Grantee shall have the right to use the Easement Area solely for the purposes of constructing, reconstructing, removing, replacing, operating, inspecting, maintaining, repairing, relocating and improving underground sewage transmission and collection facilities, which facilities may include, without limitation, gravity pipelines, pressure pipelines, manholes, connections and appurtenant equipment for the collection and transmission of sewage under the Easement Area; provided, however, that all such facilities and other improvements shall be located below the surface of the Easement Area. All surface access, construction and/or demolition activities by Grantee in connection with the Easement and/or Easement Area, including the right to deposit tools, implements and other materials on the Easement Area shall be governed by the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of that certain Stipulation entitled "Stipulation re: Nature and Extent to Proposed Project" ("Stipulation"), as filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, Case Number 267963, entitled City of Temecula, a general law city, Plaintiff, vs. -2- cKc\mervyns\ea"ment Mervvnls, a California corporation; et al., Defendants, dated of even date herewith, provided, however, that Grantee's right to (i) use any part or portion of the Easement Area surface (other than general maintenance and repairs of the Easement sewer facilities) and/or (ii) to perform or otherwise engage in any construction and/or demolition activities in connection with the Easement shall, subject to the provisions of subparagraph 10(n) hereof, expire and be of no further force or effect from and after March 31, 1997. Grantee's rights pursuant to this Grant of Easement are subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and Grantee's full performance hereunder. 3.CONSTRUCTION. (a) Compliance With Agreement. Grantee agrees that all of its construction and demolition activities conducted by it and/or its contractors shall be accomplished in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Stipulation. (b) Sewer Usage. Grantee agrees that during all construction and demolition periods, no interruption in Grantor's sewage or other utility services shall occur. (c) Applicable Law. Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws in connection with the construction, demolition and maintenance of the Easement and improvements therein, including but not limited to all Federal, State and local laws. (d) Timing. Grantee agrees that at such time as it shall commence any demolition and/or construction activities on or under the Easement Area, it will perform and complete (i) all such activities and work and (ii) the full repair and restoration of the Easement Area and any other affected parts or portions of Grantor's property to their before construction condition and to the reasonable satisfaction of Grantor, on or before the earlier of (i) March 31, 1997 and (ii) a date which shall be twenty-one (21) calendar days following the Grantee's commencement of any such construction and/or demolition work or activities, all in a lien-free, good and workmanlike manner, and in accordance with all applicable laws. The foregoing restoration shall include,, but not be limited to, (i) the removal of all -3- CkC@ mervyns\easoment of Grantee's property, debris, waste and fencing which otherwise shall not remain below the surface of the Easement Area as permitted herein, (ii) grade the surface to the original grade and remove, stock pile and replace the surface of the Easement Area to its original condition, compaction and covering and (iii) restore or replace any and all damaged property including, but not limited to, landscaping, utility lines, water lines, structures, improvements, roadways, driveways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parking areas (including restriping) and fences, damaged, removed or relocated because of the construction and/or demolition activities or other use of the Easement. (e) Interference With Operations. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the parties acknowledge that Grantee's demolition and construction activities contemplated by this Agreement, may interfere with the use and enjoyment of Grantor's property for such time, especially during the Grantor's Holiday sales season. Accordingly, Grantee agrees to complete the construction and demolition activities on the Easement Area and all repair and restoration work required herein within the aforementioned twenty-one calendar day period, but in no event later than November 1, 1996. Further, if Grantee does not reasonably expect to be able to finish all such work, including the restoration and repair work required of it herein, by November 1, 1996, Grantee agrees that it will not start the work until January 15, 1997. 4. GRANTORIS RESERVATIONS. Grantor hereby reserves the right: (i) to use the surface area of the' Easement Area for any purpose, other than construction of a building on the Easement Area, so long as such use does not substantially interfere with Grantee's rights as provided herein; the use of said surface area for pedestrian traffic, for maintaining a parking lot, driveway or sidewalk and/or for landscaping ("landscaping" as used in this Agreement shall not include trees) shall be deemed not to substantially interfere with Grantee's rights herein; and (ii) to locate other utilities in the Easement Area subject to the approval of Grantee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Grantor further reserves the right to relocate the Easement and the facilities located therein, from time to time, provided that (i) Grantor -4- ckc\mervyns\easoment pays the reasonable costs thereof, including the cost of relocating any sewer utility facilities installed by Grantee in the Easement Area, and (ii) the new location of the Easement is approved by Grantee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The rights granted to Grantee hereunder shall be personal to Grantee only and shall not be assignable or transferable; provided, however, that following Grantee's completion of the demolition and construction activities contemplated by this Agreement, and all restoration work required hereunder (which restoration shall have been approved by Grantor in writing), Grantee shall have a one time right to assign all of its right, title and interest in and to this Agreement and Grant of Easement to the Eastern Municipal Water District, a Municipal Water District ("EMWDII), provided that (i) Grantee shall not be released of any of its liability or obligations hereunder and (ii) such conveyance shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. 5. MAINTENANCE OF EASEMENT AREA. Any work by Grantor, or anyone working through or under Grantor, which materially adversely affects the surface or subsurface of the Easement Area shall be performed only after written notice by certified mail, postage paid, addressed to Grantee at Grantee's address set forth hereinbelow, setting forth the proposed changes in reasonable detail. Such notice is to be given to the Grantee at least fifteen (15) days prior to commencement of such work and is subject to approval by Grantee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding Grantor's rights under Paragraph 4 hereinabove, the surface of the Easement Area with respect to the distance from the ground surface to the top of any' pipes, as of the date of this Agreement, shall not be changed by any party hereto if it results in: (a) "cutting or removing" the soil which leaves less than forty-eight (48) inches of soil over the top of the pipes; and (b) "hauling" in of soil or "filling" which will leave more than twelve (12) feet of soil over the top of any pipe. 6. TERMINATION UPON ABANDONMENT. In the event Grantee, its successors and/or assigns, shall ckc mervyns\easernent abandon or no longer use all or any part of the easement rights herein granted for a period of two years, at the request of Grantor, Grantee shall release such easement rights to the part of the Easement no longer used by Grantee. 7. RESTORATION UPON DAMAGE. If the surface or the subsurface of the Easement Area or any other part or portion of Grantor's property shall be disturbed or otherwise damaged by Grantee or its agents, contractors, employees or the like in connection with the Easement, Grantee, at its sole cost and expense, shall restore, or cause to be restored, the surface or subsurface of the subject property, as the case may be, to the condition the same was in prior to the disturbance or damage, and such restoration shall be performed with all due diligence and dispatch pursuant to the terms set forth herein. S. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE. The construction and demolition work and Grantee's use of the Easement Area for that purpose or any other purpose permitted hereunder and all related work and activities thereto shall be at the risk of Grantee alone. Grantee hereby expressly agrees to reimburse, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify Grantor, its officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, attorneys and insurers, from and against any and all claims, damages, expenses, judgments and liability, injuries or death of persons (Grantee's employees and/or agents included) and damage to property, business or otherwise, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and expert costs, arising out of or having to do with, directly or indirectly (i) the Easement and the rights granted herein to Grantee, and (ii) construction and demolition work performed by Grantee in connection with this Agreement, the Grant of Easement or the Easement created hereby. Grantee agrees to cause its contractors to maintain reasonable and customary insurance covering its obligations under this Agreement with respect to workers compensation, injury to person or property and loss of life and will furnish Grantor with evidence of such coverage, naming Grantor as an additional insured, before commencing any use or occupancy of the Easement Area. The indemnification given herein shall survive the abandonment, expiration or early termination of this Agreement. -6- ckc\mervyns@easoment 9. DEFAULT. In the event Grantee breaches any provision of this Agreement, Grantor shall have all of the remedies available to Grantor hereunder in addition to all other rights and remedies which may be available to Grantor in equity or at law. 10.MISCELLANEOUS. (a) Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws in its construction and demolition activities and its subsequent use, operation and maintenance of the Easement and in connection with any other activities in connection with the Easement and/or this Agreement. (b) A waiver or breach of a covenant or provision in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other covenant or provision in this Agreement and no waiver shall be valid unless in writing and executed by the waiving party. An extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall not be deemed an extension of time for any performance of any other obligation or act. (c) Subject to Grantee's limited right to assign any of its rights under this Agreement, as set forth in Paragraph 4 hereof, the parties agree that this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of their successors and assigns. (d) Grantee accepts the Easement, the Easement Area under this Agreement and Grant of Easement in its "AS IS 11 condition and, by accepting this Agreement and Grant of Easement, acknowledges that Grantor has not made any representations or warranty, actual or implied, as to the condition or suitability of the Easement or the Easement Area for any use. (e) This instrument and the Stipulation contain the entire agreement of the parties. (f) This Agreement is executed in and to be performed in the State of California and shall be construed in accordance with the laws thereof. (g) Any headings at the beginning of each section and subsection are solely for the convenience of the parties and not a part of and shall not be used to interpret this Agreement. This -7- ckc\mervyns\easoment Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by one of the parties, but rather as if both parties had prepared it. (h) Any notice, request, instruction or other document to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered two (2) business days after deposit, postage prepaid in the United States mail or sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered one (1) business day after deposit with the courier, or received by facsimile transmission or similar means if a copy of the notice is also sent by United States certified mail, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered on transmittal by facsimile or other similar means provided that a transmission report is generated by reflecting the accurate transmission of the notices. All notices to be given under this Agreement shall be addressed as follows: To Grantee:City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attn:Steven Beswick To Grantor:Peg A. Schoenfelder, Esq. Director of Legal Services Mervyn's 22301 Foothill Boulevard Hayward, California 94541-2771 Mr. Mark Johnson Manager, Existing Real Estate & Property Administration Target/Mervyn's 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Mr. Darrell Robertson Manager, Mervyn's Store 26443 Ynez Road Temecula, California 92591 These addressesmay be changed by written notice to the other party provided that no notice of a change of address shall be effective until actual receipt by the parties of the notice. -8- ckc\mervyns\easoment (i) If any term or provision of this Agreement shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. (j) This Agreement may not be modified or otherwise amended except by a written amendment executed by all of the parties hereto. (k) This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by both parties hereto. (1) This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and when all of such counterpart signatures are taken together, shall constitute one instrument. (m) In the event either party hereto shall bring an action or proceeding against the other to enforce the other party's performance hereunder, the losing party shall pay to the successful party the successful party's actual attorneys fees and costs, including, but not limited to, expert witness fees. (n) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement which require that certain actions be taken within specified periods of time and/or be completed by specific dates, except with reference to the provisions of subparagraph 3(e) hereof ("Outside Date"), said Outside Date shall be subject to extensions of time as may be required where compliance with the specific Outside Date or Outside Dates cannot be met by Grantee as a result of an act of God or a labor strike (which did not result from Granteets breach under any applicable agreement); provided, however, that such extension shall be memorialized by an amendment hereto, duly executed by the parties hereto and recorded in the appropriate real estate records of Riverside County, California. -9- ckc\ rnervyns\ easement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed as of the date first set forth hereinabove. Grantor MERVYNIS, a California corporation By: Its: Grantee CITY OF TEMECULA By: Its: -10- ckc\mervyns\easement EXHIBIT A (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA) -11- c kc \ rnervyn s \easement J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE February 27, 1995 W.O. #9012240-02 Revised: October 3,1995 EXHIBIT "A" 30'E.M.W.D. SEWER, INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT CITY OF TEMECULA PROPERTY OF MERVYN'S That portion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, lying within a strip of land 30.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northerly terminus of a course in the Westerly line of said Parcel 9 which bears N.25'1 5'31 "W., 466.46'; Thence N.64044'29"E., a distance of 10.00 feet to the centerline of that certain grant of easement to Eastern Municipal Water District, recorded April 26, 1973 as Instrument No. 53391. Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence Northwesterly along said centerline on a non-tangent curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 1 1 90.00 feet, through an angle of 0401 8'58", an arc length of 89.64 feet, (the initial radial line bears S.64044'29'W.) to the Point of Beginning of said centedine to be described; Thence Northerly on a non-tangent curve concave to the East, having a radius of 1000.00 feet, through an angle of 17034'09", an arc length of 306.64 feet (the initial radial line bears S.88112'55"W.); Thence N. 1 0025'48'W., a distance of 91.33 feet; Thence N. 1 1 000'00'E., a distance of 69.75 feet; Thence N.10025'48'W., a distance of 346.53 feet to the centerline of said grant of easement to Eastern Municipal Water District, also the termination of said centerline description. The sidelines of said 30.00 foot strip of land shall be prolonged or shortened as to terminate in the Westerly line and the Northerly line of said Parcel 9. Corporate Headquarters - 1777 Atlanta Avenue, Suite G-5 - Riverside, CA 92507 - P.O. Box 493 - Riverside, CA 92502 - 909/686-0844 - FAX 909/686-5954 JFD:-JFD$ADM:[LEGAL]LEGALJD9;31MELINDAN C.* PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION City of Temecula February 27,1995 Revised: October 3,1995 Page 2 The above described parcel of land contains 0. 1 28 acres, more or less. J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared under the supervision of: Eip Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152 Date: MWC/DJK/mh JFD::JFDSADM:CLEGALILEGALJD9;31MELINDAN o u u 62 - F- C3 a: LLJ Z <z 4i z cc LU Co a. lu O< tli 0 L) > LLI a: cc i a. x uz LL cr < LU U) z 5; ui cr 7 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 590- of On before me, DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER E r, 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/thei'r signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT l@l INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED F GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES@ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 2 C31 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park. CA 91309-7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 5907 State of County of before me, On DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER E.G . 'JANE DO@-. NOTARY PUBL'-- personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT F-I INDIVIDUAL F-l' CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITLE(S) I PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME -@F OE@RSONIS) OR ENT@(IES@, SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Oc 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Recording Requested By and when Recorded Return to: EXHIBIT B EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 2300 San Jacinto, CA 92551-8300 Attn: This Document Must Be Signed in the Presence of Notary & Notarized. NO Recording Fee Required Pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 GRANT OF EASEMENT The City of Temecula, a general law city (hereinafter "Grantor") does hereby grant and convey to The Eastern Municipal Water District, a municipal water district ("Grantee") and its successor in interest, a non- exclusive easement, thirty (30) feet in width, in, upon, along, under, over and across that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of- California, legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Easement"), together with all of the sewer facilities located within the Easement. This Grant of Easement shall be subject to all of the provisions, termsand conditions of that certain document entitled"Agreement and Grant of Easement" executed on Aprilf 1996, by and between Mervyn's, a California corpora:Flon, as grantor therein ("Mer@ntsil) and Grantor herein, as grantee therein, which instrument was recorded April r 1996, with the Riverside County Recorder's office, Instrument Number ("Agreement"), and the Grantee's execution of the Certificate of Acceptance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Certificate of Acceptance"). By executing the aforementioned Certificate of Acceptance, Grantee hereby assumes and agrees to duly perform and be bound -12- ckc\ mervyns\ easement by all of the terms, covenants, conditions and obligations of the "Grantee" under the Agreement, together with this Grant of Easement, all for the benefit of Mervyn's, except for the following: (i)Numbered Paragraph 3 of the Agreement; and (ii)Numbered Paragraph 8 of the Agreement. Nothing contained herein or omitted herefrom shall be construed as a release of the City of Temecula, whether express, implied or otherwise, of its obligations, covenants, representations and/or warranties under the Agreement, all of which shall survive this Grant of Easement. Grantee shall maintain the Easement and all facilities and improvements therein and thereon and all related work and activities thereto shall be at the risk of Grantee. Grantee hereby expressly agrees to reimburse, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify each of Mervyn's and Grantor, their officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, attorneys and insurers, from and against any and all claims, damages, expenses, judgments and liability, injuries or death of persons (Grantee's employees, and/or agents included) and damage to property, business or otherwise, including without limitation, attorneys' fees and expert costs, arising of or having to do with, directly or indirectly the continued use of the Easement and the facilities located therein by Grantee and all of Grantee's activities relating to the use and maintenance of the Easement and said sewer facilities conveyed hereby. Dated: 1996 CITY OF TEMECULA By: Its: Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK -13- ckc\ mervyns\euerrvent CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant of Easement dated , 199_ from the City of Temecula, a general law city E-o the Eastern Municipal Water District, a municipal water district, to which this Certificate of Acceptance is attached, is hereby accepted according to the terms and conditions set forth therein by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the Board of Directors pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution Number 80 of the Board of Directors adopted on January 14, 1953, and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer or agent. Dated:EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a municipal water district By: Its: -14- ckc mervyrs\ easement EXHIBIT A [LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT] -15- ckc\mervyns\oasemenl J. F. Oavicison Associates, Inc. ENGINE=-RING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTLRE February 27, 1995 W.O. " "901 2240-02 Revised:October 3, 1995 EXHIBIT "A" 30'E.M.W.D. SEWER, INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT CITY OF TEMECULA PROPERTY OF MERVYN'S That portion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, lying within a strip of land 30.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northerly terminus of a course in the Westerly line of said Parcel 9 which bears N.25015'31'W., 466.46'; Thence N.64"44'29"E., a distance of 10.00 feet to the centertine of that certain grant of easement to Eastern Municipal Water District, recorded April 26, 1973 as Instrument No. 53391, Official Records of Riverside County, California; . Thence Northwesterly along said centerline on a non-tangent curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 1190.00 feet, through an angle of 04018'58 an arc length of 89.64 feet, (the initial radial line bears S.64"44'29'W.) to the Point of Beginning of said centerline to be described; Thence Northerly on a non-tangent curve concave to the East, having a radius of 1000.00 feet, through an angle of 17034'09", an arc length of 306.64 feet (the initial radial line bears S.88'1 2'5 5 "W.); Thence N. 1 0025'48"W., a distance of 91.33 feet; Thence N.1 1000'00"E., a distance of 69.75 feet: Thence N. 1 0"25'48"W., a distance of 346.53 feet to the centerline of said grant of easement Munic'ipal Water DisLrict, aiso the termination of said centerline description. The sidelines of said 30.00 foot strip of land shall be prolonged or shortened as to terminate in the Westerly line and the Northerly line of said Parcel 9. (:oroorate Heacc:uar,ers - 1777 Atlanta Avenue. Suite r,-5 - Riversicle. CA. 92507 - PO. Box 493 - R@verside. CA 92----.D2 =@X @FD::jFDSADM:fL;:GAL]LEGALJD9;31MELINDAN %J 'PIN7E,:) ON RECYCLE[) PAPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION City of Temecula February 27, 1995 Revised: October 3, 1995 Page 2 The above described parcel of land contains 0. 1 28 acres, more or less. J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared under the supervision of: Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152 Date: MWC/DJK/mh J F D::@'FDSA OM:(L@- GAL]L-@GALi 1)9; 31 ME LINDAN cr co QC rr, LLi cr ui LU > 0 a: CL CL cc U) cn LU r z -i 0 z a: LLI LL 4, Ct) ci > LLJ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 State of County of On before me, DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER E.G. -JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - Fl, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form, CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATEOFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TrrLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED ATTORNEY-IN-FACT GENERAL NUMBER OF PAGES TRUSTEE(S) -7 GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NANIE OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE :c)l 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 of On before me, DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., -JANE DOEL NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - j7 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed- the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TRFLE(S) PARTNER(S) F7 LIMITED 7 GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR 71OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENT17Y(IES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE DI 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 EN4 9 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC 0 CITY MANAGER kV@ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: v April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Interim Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive - Project No. PW96-03 PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW96-03, Traffic Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive. BACKGROUND: County Assessment District 161 is proposing to widen Winchester Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Margarita Road. The street widening project will be detouring traffic from Winchester Road onto Margarita Road. This project will provide a three-way traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive and is expected to be constructed prior to the road improvements on Winchester Road which are scheduled to begin in June. Due to the urgency of this installation and the long lead time for the signal equipment, the traffic signal poles, controller cabinet and controller are being ordered by the City so they will be available to the contractor after the project has been bid. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction. The estimated construction cost for this project is $70,000. The plans and specification are available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded through Signal Mitigation Funds. -I- r. \agdrptk%\0423 @03.bid ITEIN4 1 0 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIR CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for SR 15 and Overland Drive Overcrossing Project (Project No. PW95-1 1) PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Debbie Powell, CIP Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City CouncilAdopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(001), SR 15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the Overland Drive Overcrossing the City applied for State construction funding under Senate Bill 300, State-Local Transportation Partnership Program. The funds were granted through Program Supplemental No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for State-Aid Project No. 008-5459. The California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) who administers the funds requires that the attached resolution be adopted in order to receive funds under Cycle 6 (Fiscal Year 1995/96) in the amount of $588,441 which will fund a portion of the total construction costs. This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to Caltrans approval. r\agdrpt\96\0-423\sb3OOl.rrs/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and is being partially funded through Cycle 6 of the State- Local Transportation Partnership Program (Senate Bill 300). SB300 funds have been allocated in the amount of $588,441 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8. ATTACHMENTSO 1.Resolution No. 96- 2.Supplement Agreement No. 001 -2- r:\mgdrpt\96\0-423\sb3OOl.rca/ajp RESOLUTTON NO. % A RESOLUTTON OF TBE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CrrY OF ULA APPROVING FROGRAM SUPPL NO. 001 TO TBE LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AG NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATTON AND TIE[E Crff OF CULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMMER SLTPP-5459(001), SR 15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHER]EAS, before SMW-Aid will be made for Project No. PW95-11, Overland Drive Overcrossing, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement. WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 001 allocates funding in the amount of $588,441 for Cycle 6, Fiscal Year 1995/96, for the construction of said project. NOW RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 001 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement. Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APFROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor AT'MT: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\sb3OOl.res/aip SEAL] STATE OF CALIEFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERS]IDE Ss CrrY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby ce@ that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIIL ERS: NOES: COUNCIILMEEM13ERS: ABSENT: - COUNCIIL ERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCIIL ERS: 4- r.\agdrpt\96\0423\ab3OOl.rcs/Rip PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 Date: March 31, 199 6 to Location: 08-RIV-15 Project Number: SB96-5459(001) ';TATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION EA Number: 08-354601 ARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the StaL'e-Local Trans- portation Partnership Program Agreement for the State Share Funds which was entered into between the Local Entity and the State on 07/29/193 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the a-@oremen- tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved bv the Local Entity on (See copy attached). The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: SR 15 AND OVERLAND DRIVE INTERCHANGE TYPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCT OVERCROSSING LENGTH: 0. 2 (Miles) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK @ Construction Estimated Cost State Share Funds Matching Funds FY96$ 588441 Local Other Other $104)07500 FY97$ 0 9419059 $ 0 $ 0 FY98$ 0 Citv of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By Bv Chief, Office of Local Programs Project Implementation Date Date Attest Tltlc I hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this an rance Accoun@- Officer Date 588441.00 Chapter I Statute i Item Year Program I'll Fund Source A.NIOL-N'T 34)3 199-; 2660-@-o42 9S-96 20.2S.010.100 C 258010 042-T 588441.00 El-, Ioz:). -@rx Z) z -, 08-RIV-15DATE: 03/30/96 SB96-5459(001) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was made. The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable shall not exceed $ 588441 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows: FY 95-96 $ 588441 FY 96-97 $ 0 FY 97-98 $ 0 Any increase in State Partnership funds will require a revised program supplement. Any decrease in State Partnership funds will require a revised finance letter. 2. The State Share Funds in this agreement are based on the approved eligible application amount and represent maximum State Funds available for this project. Actual State Share Funds will be calculated after bid opening and will be based on the lower of the approved eligible application amount or the eligible award amount. 3. In accordance with the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Guidelines dated June 8, 1994, project eligibility is limited to contract items plus locally funded State or Local Entity furnished materials and Supplemental Work. Supplemental Work eligibility is further defined under the Project Eligibility section of the Guildelines as limited to certain maximum costs and to non-early reimbursement projects of $300,000 or less. 4. The Reimbursement Ratio for this Cycle 6 (95/96) Project is 5.88%. Page 2 of covnts.frx 08-RIV-15 DATE: 03/30/96 SB96-5459(001) 5. Within 120 days of project completion a Final Report of @ enditures must be transmitted to the Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer. 6. A Final Audit must be completed and transmitted to the Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer by December 30th (the State fiscal year following project completion). Page 3 of 3 covnts.frx ITE?4 11 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 002 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for SR 15 and Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project (Project No. PW95-12) CQI PREPARED BY: @D Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Debbie Powell, CIP Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(002), SR 15/RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the Rancho California Interchange Improvement Project, the City applied for State construction funding under Senate Bill 300, State-Local Transportation Partnership Program. The funds were granted through Program Supplemental No. 002 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for State-Aid Project No. 008-5459. The California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) who administers the funding requires that the attached resolution be adopted in order to receive funds under Cycle 6 (Fiscal Year 1995/96) in the amount of $381,130 which will fund a portion of the total construction costs. This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to Caltrans approval. r. \Wrpt\%@0423\sb3OO2. res/aip FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and is being partially funded through Cycle 6 of the State- Local Transportation Partnership Program (Senate Bill 300). SB300 funds have been allocated in the amount of $381,130 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8. ATTACHMENTS@ 1.Resolution No. 96- 2.Supplement Agreement No. 002 -2- r.\agdrpt%96\0423\ab3OG2.res/ajp RESOLUTION NO. % A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECLTLA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPL NO. 002 TO THE LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN T.HE STATE DEPAR OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUM[BER SLTPP-5459(002), SR 15CHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CHANGE 0PROJECT The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: , before State-Aid will be made for Project No. PW95-12, Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement. WHERF,AS, Program Supplement No. 002 allocates funding in the amount of $381,130 for Cycle 6, Fiscal Year 1995/96, for the construction of said project. NOW'L MMRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 001 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement. Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APFROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A=T: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r.\agdrpt\96NO423\sb3OO2.rce/ajp SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERS]IDE Ss CrrY OF TF2viECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby ce@ that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIILMEM13ERS: NOES: COUNCIIL ERS: ABSENT: COUNCIILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIILMIEM13ERS: 4- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\mb3OO2.rea/ajp PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 Date: March 3 1, 1 9 9 6 t o Location: 08-RIV-15 Project Number: SB96-5459(002) ';TATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION EA Number: 08-354601 ARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the State-Local Trans- portation Partnership Program Agreement for the State Share Funds which was entered into between the Local Entity and the State on 07,,29/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the aforemen- tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved bv the Local Entity on (See copy attached). The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERNIINT: SR 1-5 AND RANCHO CKLIFOFNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE TYPE OF WORK: MODIFY INTERCHANGE LENGTH: 0. 6 (miles) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK @ construction Estimated Cost State Share Funds Matching Funds FY96$ 381130 Local Other Other $6481800 FY97$ 0 $6100670 $ 0 $ 0 FY98$ 0 City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Chief, Office of-Local Programs Project Implementation Date Date Attest Tide I hereby Certify upon my personal )mcywlodge that budgeted funds are available for this on ramce Accountinc, Officer Date 381130.00 Chapter I Statute i Item Year Program BCI Fund Source I A.VIOUN'T 31)3 1995 2660-12:,-042 9S-96 20.25.010.100 C 258010 042-T 381130.00 supp. @lrx Page 1 o i-: 3 08-RIV-15DATE: 03/30/96 SB96-5459(002) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was made. The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable shall not exceed $ 381130 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows: FY 95-96 $ 381130 FY 96-97 $ 0 FY 97-98 $ 0 Any increase in State Partnership funds will require a revised program supplement. Any decrease in State Partnership funds will require a revised finance letter. 2. The State Share Funds in this agreement are based on the approved eligible application amount and represent maximum State Funds available for this project. Actual State Share Funds will be calculated after bid opening and will be based on the lower of the approved eligible application amount or the eligible award amount. 3. In accordance with the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Guidelines dated June 8, 1994, project eligibility is limited to contract items plus locally funded State or Local Entity furr-@-shed materials and Supplemental Work. Supplemental Work eligibility is further defined under the Project Eligibility section of the Guildelines as limited to certain maximum costs and to non-early reimbursement projects of $300,000 or less. 4. The Reimbursement Ratio for this Cycle 6 (95/96) Project is 5.88%. Page 2 of 3 covnts.frx 08-RIV-15 DATE: 03/30/96 SB96-5459(002) 5. Within 120 days of project completion a Final Report of Expenditures must be transmitted to the Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer. 6. A Final Audit must be completed and transmitted to the r-'altrans District Local Assistant Engineer by December 30th (the State fiscal year following project completion). Page 3 of 3 covnts.frx ITEIN4 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRI CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 008 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for the Barrier Rail at Front Street and Empire Creek (PW95-17) PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX- 5459(007), BARRIER RAIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK BACKGROUND: The City applied for Federal Funding to construct a barrier rail on each side of Front Street at Empire Creek. The funds have been granted and allocated through Program Supplement No. 008 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 08-5459. This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to Caltrans approval. Funds for the construction of this project have been allocated in the amount of $9,184 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8. pwO4/r:Xagdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement project and is being funded through the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). HBRR funds have been allocated in the amount of $9,184 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8. Attachments: Resolution No. 96- Supplement Agreement No. 008 -2- pwO4/r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTTON OF THE Crff COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF ULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT10N AND THE CITYOF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-5459(007), BARRIER RAIIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: , before Federal-Aid will be made available for Project No. PW95-17, Barrier Rail at Front Sreet and Empire Creek, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement. , Program Supplement No. 008 allocates funding in the amount of $9,184 for the construction of said barrier rafl project. NOW,'L @R, BE rr RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1.That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement Agreement No. 008 between State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2.Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement Section 3.The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A=T: June S. Greek, City Clerk pwO4/r:\agdrpt\9 6\0423\pw9 5-1 7.sup [SEAL] STATE OF CALHURNIA COUNTY OF ]]DE ss CrrY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote: AM: - COUNCIIL ERS: NOES: - COUNCIIL ERS: ABSENT- - COUNCIIL ERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCIL ERS: -2- pwO4/r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008 to LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-54S9 Date:March 20, 1996 Location:08-RIV-0-TMCA Project Number: STPLX-5459(007) E.A. Number: 08-955833 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON FRONT STREET AT EMPIRE CREEK, BRD. #56C- 384@ TYPE OF WORK: INSTALL BRIDGE BARRIER RAIL LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [ I Preliminary Engineering [ I Right-of-Way [XI Construction Engineering [XI Construction Estimated Costj Federal Funds Matching Funds Local OTHER OTHER 10375 33D $ 9184 $ 1191 $ 0 $ 0 BRP $ 0 City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Chief, Office of Local Programs Project Implementation Date Date Attest Title .-.---by -er:,,@y upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: Accounting Offic Date -3 . $9184.00 Chapter! Statutes Item Yea Program IBCI Fund Source AMOUNT 303 199S 2660-101-890 95-96 20.30.010.810 c 262040 892-F 9184.00 Page 1 of 2 08-RIV-0-TMCA DATE: 03/20/96 STPLX-5459(007) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1.All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 2.The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local Programs. 3.The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current Local Program Procedures or the new Local Programs Manual, when issued. 4.This agreement supplements the Local Agency-State Master Agreement for Federal-Aid projects, with the understanding that all provisions of the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) apply. 5.in executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. 6.Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili- zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 ITEIN4 13 APPROATAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREOOFT- CITY MANAGER@) CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1995 SUBJECT:Award of Contract for the Rancho California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-25 PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scot Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1 .Award a contract for the construction of the Rancho California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-25 to Gosney Development, for $27,430.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,743.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On March 12, 1996 the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Rancho California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-23. This project bid with an alternative bid to construct a sidewalk on the north side of Rancho California from Lyndie Lane to 500 feet west. Currently the developer of the property at Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane is building a Texaco gas station. The developer is conditioned to install sidewalk along the entire frontage of the property. When the developer completes the required improvements there will be no need for the City to construct the alternative bid. Therefore, it is recommended that only the base bid be awarded. The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $40,000. -1- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-25.awdajp Twelve (1 2) bids for the project were publicly opened on April 4, 1 996 and the results for the base bid are as follows: BASE BID ALTERNATIVE NO. CONTRACTOR ($) 11 ($) 1 Gosney Development 27,430.00 6,000.00 2 Sean Malek 29,870.00 7,475.00 3 Gosney Construction 31,012.00 7,310.00 4 Utility Equipment 34,224.00 8,553.00 5 Hilicrest Contracting 34,955.00 6,260.00 6 E.A. Mendoza 35,415.00 6,520.00 7 lnterwest Pacific 35,400.00 9,200.00 8 Elite Bobcat 38,167.58 7,775.00 9 Comino Irvine Co. 38,520.00 8,890.00 10 J. D. C., I n c. 39,060.00 5,105.00 11 Chino Construction 40,260.00 5,760,001 12 West Coast Construction 42,220.00 6,900.00], Gosney Development has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other areas in Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work. The construction schedule is for 30 working days. Work is expected to begin mid-May and be completed by the end of June, 1996. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will receive 80% in SB821 funds which are administrated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The balance will be funded by the City through Development Impact Fees - Public Facilities. Funds are available in Account No. 210-165-661-5804 for the construction contract and contingency amounts of $27,430.00 and $2,743.00 for a total of $30,173.00. ATTACHMENTS* Contract r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-25.awdajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW95-25 RANCHO CALIFORNIAISANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23rd day of April, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and GOSNEY DEVELOPMENT , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: l.a.CONTRACT DOCUME@ The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95- 25, RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifwcations for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications') as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-25, RANCHO CALIFORNIAISANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95- 25, RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, CONTRACT CA-1 r: \cip \ projects\pw 9 5- 25\co ntract equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW95-25 RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. 3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. 4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Twenty- seven thousand four hundred and thirty DOLLARS and No CENTS ($27,430.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Thirty (30) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. 5.cHANGE6RDERs. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6.PAYMENTS, A.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. B.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under CONTRACT CA-2 r: \cip\p rojects\pw 95- 25 \contract the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. C.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMO@ RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE $25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3% $75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount in excess of $500,000 8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1 777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. CONTRACT CA-3 r: \cip\p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 11.TIME OF THF F;SFN(F. Time is of the essence in this contract. 1 2.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site Of CO-,STruction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 1 3.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 1 5.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stai.-@7 - that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcortractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either !abor or materials, except certain items, if 3ny, to be set forth ;r, an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 1 6.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 1 7.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 1 8.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and CONTRACT CA-4 r: \cip \ p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21.ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 1 01 - 336, as amended. 22.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Gosney Development James Gosney 17434 Holly Drive Fontana, California 92335 By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED:CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor CONTRACT CA-6 r: \cip\p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw95-25\contract ITEIA 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECI CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Pala Road Bridge over Temecula Creek RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification No. 5-044-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign said Agreement. BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the proposed construction of Pala Road/Temecula Creek Bridge, the Environmental Studies pursuant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code have been completed. Based on that study, it has been determined that fish and wildlife may be effected by the proposed construction. The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the study and is proposing certain mitigating measures as conditions of the permit. The various mitigation measures are described in the attached agreement. Riverside County Transportation and Land Development Agency, Transportation Department has been the lead agency during the environmental process. After reviewing the proposed 'Agreement' it was their opinion that the extension provisions of Condition No. 4 should be 24 months in lieu of the proposed 12 months. Current provisions anticipate the completion of the project by 1998, with 12 month extension, the completion (termination of this agreement) is anticipated by not later than 1999. The additional 12 month extension anticipates completion by the year 2000. Although we do not share their concern, we did not discourage their request to the Department of Fish and Game for such modifications. If the Department of Fish and Game agrees to such modification, it is the request of the staff to so modify the Agreement without any further action by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the total cost for compliance with subject agreement would not exceed $750,000, shared equally by the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. The City's portion is estimated not to exceed $350,000. A portion of the necessary funding has been included for the environmental portion of the project in the Fiscal Year 1995-96 CIP Budget and proposed for the balance of funding in the Fiscal Year 1997-98 CIP Budget. -I- r.\agd@\96\0423 agr/ajp ATTACHMENTSG 1 . Letter: Riverside County to Department of Fish and Game 2.Agreement Department of Fish and Game and City of Temecula -2- r-\agdrpt\96\0423@agr/aip IFriday April 12, 1996 9:37wn -- Froin 1909 788 61981 -m Page 21 Apr.12.1996 10:52AM NATIONAL B/M DEMO No.0749 P. 2/2 COUNTY OF RWERS]IDE T SPORTA77ON L4ND AGEMENT AGENCY David E- Barnitart @ansportafic)n Department Direcror of 7ransporiation April 9, 1996 Udorru,LDepw=ent offish W Gam 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 Attn:Doe Sudduth SUBJECT; Sbed Altem6on agreement NOtirlcxtion # 5-044-96 ]PjtlaRoad Bridge (Temecula Creek) RePlAcementProject Dear Dee, in receipt of the above agreement The City of Temecula and the Transportation Depmtmerit are of the agre=ent, foir the Pala Road Bridge project In general we are satisfied with the tenm with one exception. Condition # 4 allows for only one, one year extension to the agreement prior to its expirafion on July 30, 1998. We are tly in the process of complying with Section 106 of the National lestoric Properties Act required due to the projects federal fun&mg. Since the delays associated with compliancewith Section 106 can be lengthy and difficult to anticipate, we ask that the City of Ternecula be given the possibility of two (2), one year cxt@ons on the agreement. Please feel free to caU me at (909)275-2016 if you have any questions or wish to discuss this fbr all your help. or Planner Donovan, IZCTD k4cphy,ic4lc. City of T@la pawil J@ Ogam EFS file 4080 Lemon Street, Sth Floor - Riverside, California @01 - (909) 275-6740 P-0. Box 1090 - Riversidt, California 92502-IOW I FAX (909) 275-6721 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Eeach, Cal-ifcrr-ia 90SC2 Notification No. 5-044-96 AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STREAM OR LAKE ALTERATION -.'@IS LGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Devartmen-- 74-s'- and Game, hereinafter call-ed the Department, and name: jose-@h K4---ak, Director, representing: City of Temecula, address: 43174 Business Park Temecula, CA 92590, nhone: (909) 694-6411, County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter called the Operator, is as follows: WH---REAS,iDurs,aant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code, the OiDerator, on the 7th day of February, 1996, notified the Department that thev intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed, channel-, or bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) of, the following water(s): Temecula Creek of Riverside County, tributary to Santa Margarita River, located south o@ Highway 79, at Pala Road. Section -, Townshin 8 S, Range @" W, USGS Map Temecula and Pechanga. WF-EREAS, the Department (represented by Dee Sudduth, who has made an Inspection of subject area on the day of 1996) has determined that such operations may substantially adversely affect ex4-sting fish and wildlife resources including: those songbirds, raptors, other birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, plants, and all other aquatic resources and wildlife in the streambed/lake and associated area affected by the proposed project in this agreement. 7w---REFOP---, the Department hereby proposes measures to vrotect -fish and resources during the operator's work. The O-Derator herebv agrees to accerz the -following measures/cond4-t@-ons as part of the nropcsed work. --f the Onerator's work changes from that stated i--i the notification specified a@o-,re, tnis agreement is no longer valid and a new notil@-cat@-cr. shall be submitted to the Denartment of Fish and Game. Failure to comply wi---h the -crcv--s--ons of this agreement and with other Der,@inent code sections, including '-u:: no:: !---m'-ted to Fish and Game Code Sections S650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may result --n prosecution. --n --'-4-s agreement au--hor@-zes the ODeratcr to tresnass on any land or no-- does @--. relieve the ODeral@cr of resnonsibil@--v for com-ol4-ance ar-zl--cable --Federa'-, state, or lo--al laws or ordinances. A consummated h -- a@reemen-- does not constitute Devar--mert of Fish and Game endorsement of @he @--O'CCS=-Q operation, or ass-are .he Depar@men--'s concurrence with Derm'-ts ---rom other auencies, NA L-@@7-@-M---NT E7-@-OM7-S -7FFECT---@E ON DATE OF D7-P@,TMENT'S S--@G T@,-7 -a2@ Juiv 30, 1998, For the zropcsed project onlv. The Onerazo- may r=-@esz an e,-:tens,-cr- of --he agreement annual',%, for a month period if cors@ructicn time is necessary. The extens4-cn sha--!- be requested --For @c t-e termination date of --he agreement. This agreement sha remain -or that t-me necessary to saz--s-@-v the terms/@ond'-t'-cns of @h--s a@--eemen@. Pace -- of '-: S--REAMEEZ) COli--@-'-"IONS FOR NO-LIF 7CATION @BER: -.he -following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and resolved by this agreement. The signing of this agreement does not 4-rnziv that --he Or)erator is precluded 'rom doing other activities at the site. '-oweier, activities no-. soecif4-caliv aareed to and resolved bv this agreement, sqall !De sub@lect to seoarate notification nursuant to Fish an@ Game C;de 7----co et sea.. The Operator nronoses to a'-ter the following streambed: Tenec,,:!-a Cree@:, to Der-@orm the -@ol'-owina work: Construction of a new 94 foot 9 --ich wide 1-ane bridge and associated road realignment immediately upstream of the e%:isl-.-g Pro-ocsed project ac-aid result in a total of 1.49 acres c-@-ner-nanen@ im-cacr- including 0.13 acres of southern willow scrub, 1.2E acres o:: r--r)ar,-an woodland and 0.7- acres of sparsely vegetated channel. 3.4S acres of zemocrar,., impacts include 0.74 acres of southern willow scrub, '..EC acres of r@-narian -woodland and C.!!- acres o: szarsely vegetated channel, as described -n the submitted application. The agreed work includes activities associated with No. 2 above. The prc@ect area -is located in the I-cllow'-ng streambed Temecula Creek, Riverside Coun-.v, located approximately as follows: at Pala Road just south of Highway 79. Sect4-or- I Township 8 S, Range 2 W, USGS Map Temecula and Pechanga. Sz)eci4@-c work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the loans and documents submitted by the operator and shall be implemented as proposed, un-ess directed di--F@@erent-iv by this agreement. 4. The Operator shall request an extension of this agreement -orior to its termination. Extensions may be granted for up to 12 months from the date of termination of .he agreement a.-id are subject to DeDartmenr-al approval. The extension request ana fees shall be submitted to the Department's Region 5 Office at the above address. if the Ozerator fails to request the extension prior 'to the agreement's termination, then the Operator shall submit a new notification with -fees and required information to !--he Denartment. The Operator may request up to one extensions of this agreement. Any activities conducted under an expired agreement are a violation of Fish & Game Code Section 1600 et.sec.. 5. The Operator certifies by signing this agreement that the project site has been surveyed and shall not impact any rare, threatened or endangered species; or the Operator certifies that such a survey is not required for the proposed project. If rare, threatened or endangered species occur within the proposed work area, or could be impacted by the work proposed, this agreement shall not be valid and the Operator shall not proceed with the project until the Operator consults with the Department and obtains any required State and/or Federal pe=its. 6.U7.a-jc'@dahle @-m@ac@s to wetlands shall be mitigated for bv the creation, reservation and revegeta--icn of 9.41 acres of riparian wood--and a,-Id scrub. The i.45 acres of oermanen-@ Impacts shall be mitigated for throuah a combination of s4-@e creazi . or- and a 3:! off site reservation. The @.45 acres of t:em-ocrar-,, -moac@s sha' 7- be 7.@-@@-cTated bv reveqe--ation on site a@- a 1:1 ratio. s --e -creserirat 4-c7. of acres shall be 7-ccated in --he r@-nar@-an on DroDert%7 e;h'ch sha--,.'- be n,,irchased bv the C---v a---; Protected in znrough a conservation easement. of Temecula s-a7--- za--c-@ase a,-id Preserve in an off 2cr ::ae creation c@- '-.49 acres cz ricar--an wcod:-ana a--ic -@or z)ermanen: Impacts. The 7-ocat@-oi and of the as we7-'- as --he creation =!-an shall he sub-ecz --o the review and a-o-croial of the De-oar-,zmenz - o r -- c -o,-, r c -,ia s e @'z)era--cr s-a7--- --.-zlement a'-!- --rc%7@@s--cns of the Pala Road @r--dae Prc-ec@ -,qe@'-and Plan -crer)ared I-v lgder, ar-a @-ner@%- Ser-,r@-ces Co., :-c. dated Dece,,=er 22, 1995. --'-e C4-t:-@- s-@a!7- '---re a e.,:per@---nced i-- -,ve----,an,-4 restoration -for @,--eaz--cn and restc)ra----cn -L--ojec@s. Page 3 of 5 (5-044-96) n those zro-4ec- areas where nesting birds may occur, the Ooeratcr either shall no-. removepotential nesz@-nct riparian vegetation from March !S t-rcuun September 15, orshall suriey all potential nesting r@---oar4-an vegetation w@-th@-:- the project sitefor active bird nests. If an active bird nest is located the nest-- site shal--be flagged or staked a Minimum of 5 yards in all.d4---ect@-cns, and --his flagged zone shall not be disturbed until the nest becomes :.nact@@@.7e, unless otherwise directed bv the Der)artmert (re@'.: Fish and Game Codes 35c@-, 3-@cl--.-71. 7c a-,,old direct @Tnr)ac-s to southwestern pond turtle during construct'-- tc--alof two sur,,,evs for southwestern pond turtle shall be conducted Ma-,7,7une and July nesting period to identi-lv pond turtle activity within suitable we,-la.-id habitats and adjacent uoland areas that could he used -@3r nesting at least 500 feet of the impac- zone. All surveys shall- -ce conducted bv a qualified b4-cloaist. Anv pond turtles found shal7- be cartared an_; relocated bv the qualified biologist an@ all information on the relocation ana numbers moved shall be reported to the Department in a timely manner. '-3. The construction area shall be conspicuously marked through fencing or flagging and all workers shall be given training on working in and around sensitive wetiand habitats. '-4. -Tle removal or disturbance of soil, vegetation and vegetative debris from the szreambed or bank shall not exceed the limits aouroved by the DeiDarzmenz, or as described in the submitted application. 15. @.reas of disturbed soils with slopes toward a stream shall be stabilized to reduce erosion potential. where possible, stabilization shall include the revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area. Plant'-,-g, seeding and mulching is conditionally acceptable. where suitable vegetation cannot reasonably be expected to become established, ncn-erod4ble materials may be used for such stabilization. All rip - rap identified in the nro@ect c7-ans shall- he buri-ed with native soil to allow for a cover of native n'-a.-zs to reestablish. 'E. Geos,,rnthetic soil stabilization fabrics shall be des4g.-Iod into the T)roject to en-ance road bed stability within wetiand areas and to reduce or e7-imira- -ed overexcava-lion, undercutting and similar techniques. 'jeh,-cles shall not be driven or equipment operated in water covered portions of a stream or lake or in wetted areas, or where wetland vegetation, riparian %reoez:az--on, or a@ati-c or=anl-sms mav be destroyed, exceot as otherwise uro-v@-ded @cr-ne agreement: and as necessary to complete authorized work. '-@-n@,Lh, width, and height dimensions shall not exceed those of the andor the or,-g'---ial- r-atura!7v occurr4---la -@ooogra-c'nv, contour, shall- be limited to the minimal amount necessary to a----cm@-isnaareed acz@-%r'-t@-es; fil'- construction materials other @har. on-s@-te sha- consist of c'- -an uncontaminated soil, s4l--'ree gravel, and/'or --x--ent as descr--zea in the submitted application or as otherwise in -.---s agreement. 4 r@mc7ied from the size sha7-l- r-c@ be s@r@-a,r-oed,,cree.@: or on ---s bank. The sites selected on which to Dusi- cut of the stream should be selected in compliance with -.he other c: ::n--s agreeme7@::. Where possible, suitable @r,-,sr. @i.Les ma,,, be actreemen-- does ,aot authorize the construction of anv temr)orarv or per-@anen-. za,-., structure, -Flow restriction or exceidt as described 4@r-@ the @Derat:@r's -:L-av zemocrar,,r a'am, art--@ --- c--al obstruction, or other r-@w sna,- ze cc@szructed -from. materials, such as clean c-ravel or sand-bacs, -4---ch w--'-' caase little or -io siltation. necessary, ow r-iiersicns :1prevent pcl7ut4on, minimize siltation a.-id abe done in a manner that shal'- wh--@'@shall @rc-,@--de -'lows to downstream reaches. Flows to downstream reac--s S@a@e orc,,"-aec aurina a!--- times thar- 'he natura' flow would have su@r)c- -::ed Said -flows shall- be of sufficient aual-4-tv and cruantitv to sunnor@ a--@a@--c -i-@e bot:- above an'- below the diversion. Normal -flows sha@@@- be -eszore--; to @@.e s--rea,-n immeciazeiv upon completion of work at that location. Page 4 of 5 21. Precautions to minimize turbidity/siltation shall be taken into account during project planning and implementation. This may requ@-e that the work site !De isolated and /or the construction of silt catchment basins, so that s@-',-t, or other deleterious materials are not allowed to pass to downstream reaches. --he c@7-aceme,.it of any structure or materials in the stream for this -ourr)cse, ,ot included "in the original project descri:)tl . on, shall be cocrd--.-.ated with DeT)artment. Coordination shall i,-iclude-the negotiation of add--@--cna-- agreement provisions. @-2. Uoon Z)enar,:ment determination .hat ti-,rb@-d@-ty/s@-itat@-on levels resu@-t-na from. pro3 . ect related constitute a threat to acruatic life, activities associated with the ti-,rb@-d@-@y/s,-Itation, shall be halted until effective Denarzment avnro,.red control devices are ias-.alled, or abatement: procedures are 'n tated. - 2. - --3. Spc@-7- sites shall not be located within a stream/lake, where spc47 can be washed back into a stream/lake, or where it will cover acruatic or riparian --egezat@-on. The Operator mav remove all human generated debris, such as lawr. and --arm cuttings, garbace and trash. -'4. Strictures and associated materials, including debris, not designed @o W'-,z:hstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the hign water mark before such -Flows occur. .75. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any stream channel or lake mar-gin where petroleum products or other pollutants from the ecrlipment may enter these areas under anv flow. 2@. The Operator shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall be the responsibility of the cderator to ensure compliance. The ci-ean-up of all Pollution spills shall begin immediately. The O-Derator shall no@@--@v the Department immediately o-@- any slills and shall consult with the DeDartment regarding clean-up procedures and re @ rements. 26. debris, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, salt, cement or concrete or wash@-ngs thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other netr--Ieum products, or any other substances resulting from -Droject related activities which could be hazardous to aquatic life or waters of the state shall be =reve-l-ed from contaminating the so4-l and/or entering the waters of --he state. @Nc-ie of these materials s-all be a'-lowed to enter into or be solaced within or where the-@ may enter or be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the state. when onera---@ors are completed, anv excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No r,-,bbis' s hall be denos@ted within 1-50 Feet of the high water marl@ of anv stream or lake. provisions of this agreement remain in force Ihroucrhout the term of the a---eemen--. -@.v Dro-,r--sions of the agreement mav be amended or the agreement ma,. '-e terminated at anv time nrovided such amendment and/or termination is a(zreed to !D,.- both Larz:l . es. !,Iatualiv a=r)roved amendments become Dart of @ne @ri@ina- aa--eemen-- and are subject to all'- nrevi-ous7-y negctiazea nro-visic-is. the Onerazor c-- ar--,, of the individuals me-it4-cned above, c'-, a t e anc terms or of th--s agreement, a'-! work shall terminate 4-mmed--a-@e7v s,a7-'- not @roceed the Department has taken all@ of its legal ac-_iclis. T'-& DeDarznen'@ reseries the right to enter the nro:ect site at an-@ time to COMIO--ance w----h c-I -this agreement. @nera@cr shall provide a copy of this agreement to all contractors, subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the agreement shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active work and must be @resenzed --c anv DeT)a--zmen-- personnel, or persor.,nel from another ace-c-,,@ -ncn deranz. Page 5 of..S (5-044-96) 33. The Operator shall notify the Demartment, in writing, at least five (5) days prior to initiation of construction (project) activities, and at least five (5) days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification shall be sent to the Department at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA 90802, Attn: Environmental Services. 34. The Department reserves the right to susz)end and/or revoke this agreement the Department determines that the circumstances warrant. The circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the -Following: a.--a4lure to comply with the terms/ccnditions of this agreement. b.The information crovided bv the Operator in supcort of the Notif@-caticn/Agreement is determined by the Department to be i-.icommlete, or inaccurate. C.When new information becomes available to the Der)artment reoresentative(s) that was not known when preua--ing the original terms/conditions of this agreement. d.--he project as described in the Noti'@cation/Agreement has changed, or conditions affecting fi-sh and wildlife resources change. CONCURRENCE: City of TemeculaCalifornia Department of Fish and Game Joseph Kicak Dee Sudduth (signature) (date) (signature) (date) Environmental Specialist III (title) (title@,@ EIA 15 7 4 .It APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/Citv Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Construction Cooperative Agreement, State of California, County of Riverside, City of Temecula - 1-1 5/SR 79(S) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the State of California, County of Riverside and City of Temecula, Route 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange Junction Agreement No. 8-932, 08303-350510. BACKGROUND: County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency, Transportation Department, as part of Assessment District 1 59 included improvements to 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange. The original proposal for this project by the Assessment District was to widen the SR 79(S) under the 1-1 5 Bridge and continue the transition to Front Street on its current alignment. In addition, it proposed to widen the northbound on/off ramps of 1-1 5 (east side of 1-1 5). The remaining required improvements, the widening of the southbound on/off ramps and the signal installation on both sides of 1-1 5 at the on/off ramps was the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year 1995-96 Capital Improvement Budget, City Council approved $500,000 for the City's portion of the cost. In reviewing the plans for the above proposed project, it became apparent that the design by AD159 did not take into consideration the proposed connection of the Western By-Pass Corridor to subject interchange. If the project was to be constructed as proposed by AD 1 59, large portion of those improvements would require removal in conjunction with the Western By- Pass Corridor construction and realignment of Front Street. Staff has been negotiating with the County and Caltrans staff to make provisions for the ultimate improvement of the realignment of Front Street and connection of the Western By-Pass to 1-1 5/SR 79(S) interchange. These negotiations have been on-going for approximately nine (9)months, resulting in the following: 1 .Caltrans approving the City's concept and authorizing the design of the project subject to City adopting a resolution committing to ultimate improvement of the southbound on/off ramp system. This resolution (Resolution No. 96-36) was adopted by the City Council on March 26, 1996. r.\agdrpt\96\0423\il5-79s.aWajp 2.Consultant to submit plans to Caltrans for the proposed revisions. These plans were submitted for Caltrans review on April 15, 1996. 3.An agreement (verbal) between the County of Riverside and City of Temecula to jointly fund the proposed four (4) million dollar project, with the contribution of $2.8 million from the County and $1.2 million from the City. A formal agreement will be presented to the City Council as soon as available. It is anticipated that such an agreement will be completed before June 30, 1996. It should also be recognized that the completion of this project may be prior to the beginning of construction of the Western By-Pass Corridor. However, every effort will be made to coordinate the construction of the two (2) projects to minimize inconvenience to the public. FISCAL IMPACT: Previously budgeted amount of $500,000 for the City's portion of the project must be augmented by an additional $700,000 for the City's share of $1.2 million. Anticipated source of funds is the Development Impact Fee Funds. This amount will be proposed by staff during the Fiscal Year 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program budget consideration. ATTACHMENTSE Agreement -2- r.\agdrpt\96\0423\il5-79s.sWajp COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE T SPORTATION AND D AGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department David E. Barnhart Director of Transportatiori September 28, 1995 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, Ca 92590 Attn:Mr. Joe Kicak Re:Assessment District No. 159 SR 79 South Junction - Construction Cooperative Agreement Dear Joe: Attached, for your council's approval, are four (4) originals of the Caltrans Construction C, Cooperative A -reement for the above referenced project. The County of Riverside si uned the attached agreement on Tuesday, September 26, 1995. ZD Please contact me once the City Council has sioned this agreement. The County has made arrangements to hand deliver this document to the Caltrans District 8 office in San Bernardino for final signatures by the State. Please contact me at (909) 275-2091 if you have any questions, or require additional information. Sincerely, D. Kelley I Project Manacer, Assessment District No. 159 DKD:dkd xc:Dave Barnhart, RCTD Tek Tanaka. RC7D Joe Reyes, TPC file file: SR79 Coop. Acmt. Transmittal #1 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor - Riverside, California 92501 - (909) 275-6740 P.O. Box 1090 - Riverside, Ciiiifornia 9'-1502-1090 - FAX (909) 275-6721 SUBMITTAL TO THE BOAR]? OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM:T@/Transportation SUBMMALDATE: August 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Construction Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside and State of California for the construction of Route 79 at I-15 South Junction in Assessment District No. 159. RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the Board approve and direct the Chairperson to execute the attached Construction Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside and the State of California for the construction of Route 79 at I-15 South Junction in Assessment District No. 159. BACKGROUND: The County has sold bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 for improvements within Assessment District No. 159. The County desires to construct State highway improvements consisting of widening the north bound interchange ramps, and widening State Route 79 South from two-lanes to an ultimate six-lane highway from the I-15/SR79 Interchange easterly to Butterfield Stage Road. VI The County desires to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award and administer the construction contract for the future phases of State Route 79 South. The State is agreeable to the County's proposal. The attached Construction Cooperative Agreement defines the terms and conditions under which the State Route 79 South project is to be constructed and maintained. @vid E@arnhart FINANCIAL DATA: Director of Transportation 0 LU CURRENT YEAR COST $ HA :> ANNUAL COSTS HA ,o NET COUNTY COST $ HA cr C) IN CURRENT YEAR BUDGET: YES -NO X 0.0 0- RCE OF I-UNDS: AD 159 Bond Proceeds BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES NOJC FOR FY: 95/96 < It - MZ a: D OMMENDATION: APPROVE participation by the City of will be negotiated prior to bid Administrative Officer Signature MINU-TES OF THE BOARD OF SUPEIZN'ISORS On motion of Supervisor Ceniceros, seconded by Super%,isor @@ilson and dul@r carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the abo,.-e niatter is approved as recommended. .4 %@e s: Buster, Ceniceros and Wi'Lsc)n ,Noes: None Gerald A. Absent:Tava@lione and Mullen FORM ll(%@ 7M) Date: September 26, 1995 xc: TLMA, Co.Co., Auditor Deptit3, DISTRIBLJTION:K. Donovan w/agreements, Fiscal Office CLERK'S COPY $iP 2 6 1995 08-Riv-15-3.2/3.7 Route 15/79 I.C. South Junction District Agreement No. 8-932 08303 - 350510 CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by aAd- through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, referred to herein as COUNTY. and CITY OF TEMECULA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. RECITALS (1)STATE, COUNTY and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within CITY. (2)COUNTY desires to construct State highway improvements consisting of widening and signalizing existing ramps and widening on Route 79 at I-15 South Junction, referred to herein as PROJECT, and COUNTY and CITY are willing to fund one hundred percent (100%) of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except that costs of STATE's oversight of construction activities will be borne by STATE. (3)COUNTY desires to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for PROJECT in order to bring about the earliest possible completion of PROJECT; and CITY is willing to allow COUNTY to assume lead responsibility for constructing PROJECT. SEP 2 6 M5 District Agreement No. 8-932 (4)STATE is agreeable to COUNTY's proposal to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for PROJECT. (5)The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be constructed, financed and maintained. (6)Project development responsibilities for PROJECT were covered in a prior Cooperative Agreement executed by STATE and COUNTY on May 22, 1990, District Agreement No. 8-690, Document No. 7179. SECTION I COUNTY AGREES: (1)To advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT in accordance with requirements of the State Contract Act and the California Labor Code, including its prevailing wage provisions. Workers employed in the performance of work contracted for by COUNTY, and/or performed under Encroachment Permit, are covered by provisions of the Labor Code in the same manner as are workers employed by STATE's Contractors. COUNTY shall obtain applicable wage rates from the State Department of Industrial Relations and shall adhere to the applicable provision!; of the State Labor Code. Violations shall be reported to the State Departmerit of Industrial Relations. (2)To apply for necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within State highway rights of way, in accordance with STATE's standard permit procedures, as more specifically defined in Articles (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of Section IV, of this Agreement. (3)To require@ that the construction contractor furnish both a payment and performance bond in COUNTY name, with both bonds complying with the requirements set forth in Section 3-1.02 of STATE's current Standard Specifications. (4)To construct PROJECT in accordance with plans and specifications of COUNTY to the satisfaction of and subject to the approval of STATE. 2 District Agreement No. 8-932 (5)Contract Administration procedures shall conform to the requirements set forth in STATE's Construction Manual, Local Programs Manual and the Encroachment Permit for construction of PROJECT. (6)Construction within the existing or ultimate STATE right of way shall comply with the requirements in STATE's Standard specifications and PROJECT Special Provisions, and in conformance with methods and practices specified in STATE's Construction Manual. (7)If COUNTY uses own staff to perform surveys, such surveys shall conform to the methods, procedures, and requirements of STATE's Surveys Manual, and STATE's Staking Information Booklet dated April 1, 1992. (8)Material testing and quality control shall conform to the State Construction Manual and the State Material Testing Manual, and be performed, at COUNTY expense, by a certified material tester acceptable to STATE. Independent assurance testing, specialty testing, and off-site source inspection and testing shall be performed by STATE, at no cost to COUNTY except as noted herein. COUNTY shall reimburse STATE for any additional travel expens(@-r. incurred by STATE for off-site inspection and testing performed by STATE which is more than 300 airline miles from both Sacramento and Los Angeles. Approval of the type of asphalt and concrete plants shall be by STATE, at STATE expense. (9)To furnish, at COUNTY expense and subject to approval of STATE, a field site representative who is a licensed Civil Engineer in the State of California, to perform the functions of a Resident Engineer. If the PROJECT plans and specifications were prepared by a private engineering company, the Resident Engineer shall not be an employee of that company. The Resident Engineer shall also be independent of the construction contractor. (10)Subject to Article (1) of Section III of this Agreement, to pay one hundred percent (100%) of the actual costs of construction required for satisfactory completion of PROJECT, including changes pursuant to contract change orders concurred with by the STATE representative and any "State-furnished material". (11)At COUNTY expense, to furnish qualified support staff, subject to approval of STATE, to assist the Resident Engineer in, but not limited to, construction surveys, soils and foundation tests, measurement and computation of quantities, testing of construction materials, checking shop 3 District Agreement No. 8-932 drawings, preparation of estimates and reports, preparation of As-Built drawings, and other inspection and staff services necessary to assure that the construction is being performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Said qualified support staff shall be independent of the design engineering company and construction contractor, except that the PROJECT designer may check the shop drawings, do soils foundation tests, test construction materials, and do construction surveys. (12)To make progress payments to the contractor using COUNTY and CITY funds and pay all costs for required staff services as described in Articles (9) and (11) of this Section I. The STATE representative shall review all contract progress pay schedules. STATE does not assume responsibility for accuracy of itemization on progress pay schedules. (13)Within sixty (60) days following the completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction contract, to furnish STATE a complete set of acceptable full-sized film positive reproducible As-Built plans and all contract records, including survey documents and microfilm copy of all structure plans. (14)Upon completion of work under this Agreement, COUNTY will assume maintenance and the expense thereof for any part of PROJECT located outside of current STATE right of way until acceptance of any such part of PROJECT into the State highway system by STATE, approval by the Federal Highway Administrat-'-zn, if required, and conveyance of acceptable title to STATE. (15)If COUNTY terminates PROJECT prior to completion of the construction contract for PROJECT, STATE may require COUNTY, at COUNTY's expense, to return right of way to its original condition or to a condition of acceptable permanent operation. If COUNTY fails to do so, STATE reserves the right to finish PROJECT or place PROJECT in satisfactory permanent operation condition. STATE will bill COUNTY for all actual expenses incurred and COUNTY agrees to pay said expenses within thirty (30) days or STATE, acting through the State Controller, may withhold an equal amount from future apportionments due COUNTY from the Highway User Tax Fund. (16)Should any archaeological resources be encountered within the PROJECT vicinity during construction, COUNTY shall notify the STATE representative immediately. COUNTY shall be responsible for the retainment of a qualified 4 District Agreement No. 8-932 archaeologist who shall evaluate the archaeological site and make recommendations to the STATE representative regarding the continuance of PROJECT construction. SECTION II STATE AGREES: (1)To issue, at no cost to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor, upon proper application by COUNTY and by COUNTY's contractor, the necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within State highway right of way, as more specifically defined in Articles (2), (3), (4) and (5) of Section IV, of this Agreement. (2)To provide, at no cost to COUNTY, a qualified STATE representative who shall have authority to accept or reject work and materials or to order any actions needed for public safety or the preservation of property and to assure compliance with all provisions of the Encroachment Permit(s) issued to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor. (3)To provide, at COUNTY expense, any "State-furnished material" as shown on the plans for PROJECT and as provided in the Special Provisions for PROJECT. (4)To operate and maintain at State expense, exclusive of electrical energy costs, traffic control signals and safety lighting. SECTION III CITY AGREES: (1)To deposit with COUNTY, ten (10) calendar days prior to the award of the construction contract for PROJECT, all funds necessary to pay for the construction costs of widening the on and off ramps on the westerly side of the south junction of I-15 and Route 79 and to pay for the installation of all traffic control signals and safety lighting required for both the westerly and easterly on and off ramps at the south junction of I-15 and Route 79. 5 District Agreement No. 8-932 (2)To pay 100% of the electrical energy costs of Traffic control signals and safety lighting. (3)To issue, at no cost to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor, upon proper application by COUNTY and by COUNTY's contractor, the necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within CITY right of way. SECTION IV IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: (1)All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation commission. (2)Construction by COUNTY of improvements referred to herein which lie within STATE highway rights of way or affect STATE facilities, shall not be commenced until COUNTY's original contract plans involving such work and plan for utility relocations have been reviewed and accepted by signature of STATE's District Director of Transportation, or the District Director's delegated agent, and until an Encroachment Permit to COUNTY authorizing such work has been issued by STATE. (3)COUNTY shall obtain aforesaid Encroachment Permit through the office of State District Permit Engineer and COUNTY's application shall be accompanied by five (5) sets of reduced construction plans of aforesaid STATE approved contract plans. Receipt by COUNTY of the approved Encroachment Permit shall constitute COUNTY's authorization from STATE to proceed with work to be performed by COUNTY or COUNTY's representatives within proposed STATE rights of way or which affects STATE facilities, pursuant to work covered by this Agreement. COUNTY's authorization to proceed with said work shall be contingent upon COUNTY's compliance with all provisions set forth in this Agreement and said Encroachment Permit. (4)COUNTY's construction contractor shall also be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit from STATE prior to commencing any work within STATE rights of way or which affects STATE facilities. The application by COUNTY's contractor for said Encroachment Permit shall be made through the office of 6 District Agreement No. 8-932 State District Permit Engineer and shall include proof said contractor has payment and performance surety bonds covering construction of PROJECT. (5)COUNTY shall provide a right of way certification prior to the granting of said Encroachment Permit by STATE, to certify that legal and physical control of rights of way were acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and regulations. (6)COUNTY shall not advertise for bids to construct PROJECT until after an Encroachment Permit has been issued to COUNTY by STATE. COUNTY shall not construct any portion of PROJECT within the proposed STATE right of way until after an Encroachment Permit has been issued to COUNTY by STATE. (7)COUNTY's construction contractor shall maintain in force, until completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction contract, a policy of Contractual Liability Insurance, including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability in accordance with Section 7-1.12 of State Standard Srecifications. Such policy shall contain an additional insured endorsement naming STATE and CITY, officers, agents and employees as additional insureds. Their coverage shall be evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance in a form satisfactory to STATE and CITY which shall be delivered to STATE and CITY before the issuance of an Encroachment Permit to COUNTY contractor. (8)Prior to award of the construction contract for PROJECT, COUNTY may terminate this Agreement by written notice. (9)In construction of said PROJECT, representatives of COUNTY, STATE and CITY will cooperate and consult, and all work pursuant to PROJECT shall be accomplished according to approved plans, specifications and applicable STATE and CITY standards. Satisfaction of these requirements shall be verified by the STATE representative. STATE and COUNTY representatives are authorized to enter CITY's property during construction for the purpose of monitoring and coordinating construction activities. (10)Changes to PROJECT plans and specifications shall be implemented by contract change orders reviewed and concurred with by the STATE representative. All changes affecting public safety or public convenience, all design and specification changes, and all major changes as defined in STATE's Construction Manual shall be approved by STATE in 7 District Agreement No. 8-932 advance of performing the work. Unless otherwise directed by the STATE representative, changes authorized as provided herein will not require an Encroachment Permit rider. All changes shall be shown on the As-Built plans referred to in Section I, Article (13) of this Agreement. (11)COUNTY shall provide a claims process acceptable to STATE and shall process any and all claims through COUNTY's claim process. The STATE representative will be made available to COUNTY to provide advice and technical input in any claim process. (12)If any existing public and/or private utility facilities conflict with PROJECT construction or violate STATE's encroachment policy, COUNTY shall make all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection, relocation or removal in accordance with STATE policy and procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work providing for the improvement of the State highway and in accordance with CITY policy for those facilities located outside of the limits of work for the State highway. Total costs of such protection, relocation or removal shall be determined in accordance with STATE policy and procedure. COUNTY shall require any utility owner and/or its contractors performing relocation work in STATE's right of way to obtain a STATE Encroachment Permit prior to the performance of said relocation work. Any relocated or new facilities shall be correctly shown and identified on the As-Built plans referred to in Section I, Article (13), of this Agreement. (13)If any unforeseen potential hazardous waste sites are encountered during construction of PROJECT, STATE, COUNTY and CITY shall meet and confer on a course of action. The responsibilities and costs for any action shall be covered by amendment to this Agreement. (14)Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the Vehicle Code, STATE has determined that within such areas as are within the limits of PROJECT and are open to public traffic, COUNTY shall comply with all of the requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the Vehicle Code. COUNTY shall take all necessary precautions for safe operation of COUNTY's vehicles, the construction contractor's equipment and vehicles and/or vehicles of personnel retained by COUNTY and for the protection of the traveling public from injury and damage from such vehicles or equipment. 8 District Agreement No. 8-932 (15)Upon completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction contract by COUNTY to the satisfaction of the STATE representative and subsequent to the execution of a maintenance agreement, STATE will accept control and maintain, at its own cost and expense, those portions of PROJECT lying within STATE's right of way, except local roads delegated to CITY for maintenance. (16)CITY will accept control and maintain, at its own cost and expense, the portions of PROJECT lying outside STATE's right of way. Also, CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, local roads within STATE'S right of way delegated to CITY for maintenance, as well as all traffic service facilities that may be required for the benefit or control of CITY local road traffic. (17)STATE will maintain the traffic control signal system and safety lighting as installed at STATE's expense. CITY shall provide the electrical energy at CITY's expense. (18)STATE will operate the traffic control signals and safety lighting as installed at STATE's expense. (19)Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances installed within STATE's right of way will automatically be vested in STATE, and materials, equipment and appurtenances installed outside of STATE's right of way will automatically be vested in CITY. No further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership as hereinabove stated. (20)Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of any party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. (21)Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY or CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY or CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY or CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8)occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be 9 District Agreement No. 8-932 done by COUNTY or CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY or CITY under this Agreement. (22)Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE or CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE or CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless COUNTY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE or CITY under this Agreement. (23)Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or Jurisdiction delegated to STATE or COUNTY under this .Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE or COUNTY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE or COUNTY under this Agreement. (24)No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 10 District Agreement No. 8-932 (25)Those portions of this Agreement pertaining to the construction of PROJECT shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT by COUNTY with concurrence of STATE, or on November 8, 1999, whichever is earlier in time; however, the ownership, operation, maintenance, liability, and claims clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Transportation JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS Director of Transportation By Cha@@ 6ard -of Sup@lsors By 3EP 2 6 1"5 STAN LISIEWICZ District Director A k of@h6 Do" APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: d o @S @ervisors CITY OF TEMECULA Attorney, Department of Transportation By CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: Attest: City Clerk District Budget Manager FORM APPROVED COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE: 'SEP I A95 District Accounting Administrator ITEI\4 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIR CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:AuthorizeCostParticipationwithTemeculaValleyUnifiedSchoolDistrict for the Installation of a Traffic Signal at the intersection of Winchester and Roripaugh Roads. PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE participation in the cost of a Traffic Signal Installation with Temecula Valley Unified School District to be constructed as a portion of the Winchester Road Widening Project in the amount of two-thirds of the estimated cost to design and construct the signal. BACKGROUND: At their June 18, 1 994, public hearing City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-66 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 94-0002) and Resolution No. 94-67 upholding Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application No. 93-01 57) for a Transportation Administration and Maintenance Facility for the Temecula Valley Unified School District located north of Winchester Road and west of the northerly extension of Roripaugh Road (APN 911-180-024). One item of concern discussed at the hearing, was the traffic impact at the intersection of Winchester Road and Roripaugh Road. At the time of approval the representative of Temecula Valley Unified School District offered to cost participate in the installation of a traffic signal at this location to mitigate any concerns regarding traffic. The school district would like to proceed with the installation of the signal and include it's construction in the bidding of Winchester Road widening. The have requested City of Temecula cost participation (copy of letter attached) and are willing to fund one-third of the cost of design and construction. The City would fund the remaining two-thirds. -I- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\tvusdsig.nal Staff has reviewed the traffic study for the signal and have determined signal warrants will be met with the widening of Winchester Road. Staff has reviewed the school district's request and recommends approval for the following reasons: 1.The district's cost participation will reduce the City's overall cost for installation of a signal at this intersection. 2.Overall costs will be reduced by including the signal with the road widening project. Construction can be coordinated to install the signal now and avoid having to open cut the roadway to install the signal at a later date. 3.Safer access will be provided to the residents of Roripaugh Hills and the maintenance facility. 4.The signal will facilitate development of the commercial properties at this intersection which will in turn will generate the traffic signal fees to pay for most of the signal installation. 5.Pedestrian access will be improved to the residential areas by installation of the signal and related crosswalks. This will also facilitate access to future commercial developments and to recreational facilities along Santa Gertrudis Creek. FISCAL IMPACT: Signal mitigation fees will be used to fund the cost participation. The estimated cost at this time is $104,000. The City's portion will be approximately $69,000. T@'-@e exact amount will be determined after receipt of bids and completion of construction. Attachments: 1.Letter of Request from Temecula Valley Unified School District. 2.Location Map -2- r:%agdrpt%96\0423%tvusdsig.nal BOARD OF EDUCATION Barbara Tooker P,e@ni TEMECULA VALLEY Richard Shafer c@ Linda Campbell Unified School District Patti Smith @ r Rosie Vanderhaak SUPERINTENDENT Patricia B. Novotney, Ed-D. March 28, 1996 -D RECE!Vrr_ Steven CressweU, Principal Engineer Public Works Department APR I 1,Qj 9 6 City of Temecula 'Mr A _ijU; -tl. 43174 Business Park Drive DE P A,@ Temecula, CA 92590 1 T@ENT Subject.joint Funifing Request RotipaughlWtnchester Signal Dear Steve: This letter formally requests the City of Temecula to jointly fund a Roripaugh Road/%Vinchester Road 4-way traffic signal with the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Following our District's commitment to the City Council in June 1994 to participate in the 4-way traffic signal project to enhance access to our Maintenance/Operations/Transportation Facility, we have worked to enable the signal's installation in conjunction with the upcoming County Winchester Road widening project. Our efforts have resulted in a completed signal design, forwarded to the City Public Works Department January 25, 1996, and now included in the County's Winchester Road bid package. In recognition of the safety benefits to our District's operations, and the warranted community need for the signal even without District traffic (adjacent existing residences, future commercial development), the District proposes to fund up to one-third of the cost of the signal's design and construction, and requests that the City fund the balance of these costs. The total cost of the signal's design and construction is estimated at $104,000, reflecting the cost savings expected by coordinating the signal work with the larger road project. As discussed with you and with Joe Kicak Dreviously, we request that the nror)osed ioint funding arrangement be approved and formalized in time to facilitate the County's construction and payment schedule for the signal during the Winchester Road project, which goes to bid April 15, 1996. We look forward to the approval of this cooperative proposal, which very economically addresses a community safety need in a well- coordinated manner. Since Dave Gallaher Director of Facilities Development r_c:Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Kelley Donovan, County of Riverside Transportation Dept. 31350 Rancho Vista Road / Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 PROJECT SITE ,HI 0 VICINITY MAP LL I-,VA PLE bE L- PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL WINCHESTER ROAD/RORIPAUGH ROAD Location Maio NOTE:i\/L4,PS NOT TO SCALE ITEIN4 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Release Grading Security for Export of Soils (Southeast corner at Winchester Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: teven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer AKC Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Grading Security for export of soils materials from the Southeast corner of Margarita Road at Winchester Road to several sites along the northerly side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Nicolas Road, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: The Bedford Development Company sought to grade certain of their holdings in the area between Winchester Road and Santa Gertrudis Creek from Margarita Road and Nicolas Road. The area was within Tentative Parcel Map No. 26759, a proposed industrial park which abutted proposed flood control channel workto be constructed under Assessment District No. 1 61. The source site was the area owned by Bedford Development Company lying along the easterly side of proposed Margarita Road southerly of Winchester Road. All environmental issues were resolved for three borrow sites. Previous exports were approved and accomplished over two areas (Borrow Sites 2 and 3). The grading plans and grading permits (TEM 91-026, 027) for Area 3 were approved and the Letter of Credit posted as guarantee for Area 3 only. The approved plans included erosion control measures and clean-up. The developer is seeking release of a Instrument of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial Corporation as performance security for the subject borrow site, in the amount of $1 000,000. The work was satisfactorily completed in 1 991 with some erosion control restoration in the winter of 1991-1992. Subsequent to the completion of the subject export of materials, other permits have been issued for export to the high school site and other locations. agdrpt\96\0423\tp@213.exp Staff recommends the release of this document to the surety and notification to the permittee. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map agdrpt\96\0423\tpm252l3.exp LC;T 1 17 RRC PROJECT I LL OMRC3 W NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE VICINI-- M Borrow Site for Tent. Parcel Map 26759 Location Map ITEIN4 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Approval of Agreement regarding transfer of Drainage Facilities to Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. (Ynez Road northerly of Motor Car Parkway) PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The City Council APPROVE the attached agreement between Advanced Cardiovascular Systems ('ACS'), the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ('DISTRICT"), and the City of Temecula ('CITY) for transfer of Drainage Facilities to the DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the agreement, and DIRECT the City Clerk to attest thereto and to transmit the document to the DISTRICT for final processing through the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Plot Plan No. 1 which required the construction of certain drainage facilities to provide flood protection for ACS' planned development. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) inspected the project facilities as constructed by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems (ACS), and is willing to assume ownership and responsibility to operate and maintain the drainage system subject to conditions set forth in the agreement. ACS obligations under the agreement include construction of the facilities, provision of all necessary onsite easements, fee simple title to onsite rights-of-way, access rights, and other commitments, and transfer of the drainage facilities to the DISTRICT, The CITY's obligations under this agreement include granting the DISTRICT the right to operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights-of-way, and to accept responsibility for the operation and maintenance of all PROJECT inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights-of- way. The City assumes no new obligations under this agreement as street maintenance responsibilities normally include maintenance of both inlets and connector pipes. r:\agd rpt\9 6NO423@ rcf cd acs.tem FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map Agreement (on file) r:\agd rpt@9 6\0423\rcf cd acs.tem Uff7 END RCFC & EXISnNC'r X.T Wm WCD PROJECT EXI NG OSL EX@NG @ 16-4. EXiTnNc oaL r x 4, & oeL r x Q@ 72@ BEGIN RCFC WCD PROJE NOTE: LAPS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP PLOT PLAN NO. I RCFC&WCD PROJECT Location Map AGREEMENT 211(Plot Plan No. 1) 4 The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WAT-7-R 5CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRIC--", the CITY OF 6 TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY", and ADVANCED C.@RDIOVASCJLAR SYSTEMS, a California corporation, hereinafter called "T@77VELOPE.Rll, 9hereby agree as follows: in RECITALS A.DEVELOPER has received CITY approval for Plot Plan 12No. 1 in the City of Temecula, and as a condition for approval DEVELOPER was required to construct certain flood control 15facilities in order to provide flood protection for DEVELOPER" 16planned development; and 7 B. The required facilities include approximately 200 lineal feet of rectangular channel, with an underground- reinforced 19 20concrete box, hereinafter altogether called "PROJECT", extending ù'IL from an existing box at Interstate 1S, upstream to an existing box 22at Ynez Road, as shown in red on Exhibit "Al' attached here to and 23 made a r)art hereof; and 24 C. DEVELOPERdesires DISTRICT to assume ownership and 25 responsibility for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT; and 26 27 D. DISTRICT reviewed and approved the plans and 28 sdeci . ficatio,-is prepared by DEVELOPER for PROJECT, and insnecce@- 2i 3@ the construction of PROJECT under the authority of a Right of 4@ Entry and Inspection Agreement executed on Novembe-- 27, 1990 l@ 51between DISTRICT and DEVELOPER; and 611 E. DEVELOPER has deposited with DISTRICT sum of S24,000.00, the estimated cost of providing construction 8 inspection for PROJECT; and 9 F. DEVELOPER has paid DISTRICT (Zone 7 Ma4ntenance Fund), a one time cash sum of $83,300.00 to cover DISTRI,@-TIS 12 estimated costs for operation and maintenance of PROJECT through i the year 1998; and 15 G. DISTRICT is now willing to assume ownership and 16responsibility for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT, 17excluding inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights of way, 18provided, (i) DEVELOPER complies with this agreement, (ii) 20PROJECT has been constructed in accordance with plans and 21specifications approved by DISTRICT, (iii) DEVELOPER obtains and 221'conveys to DISTRICT all rights of way necessary for the operation 23and maintenance of PROJECT as set forth herein; and F. CITY is willing (i) to grant DISTRICT the right to 2 Z-) operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights of way, and (ii) 26 27to accect responsibility for the operation and maintenance of all 2 PROJECT inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights of wa,,-, 2i provided PROJECT is constructed in accordance with plans and specifications aoproved by DISTRICT and CITY. NOW, THER-7FORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as @-ollows: gi SECTION I DEVELOPER shall: 1. Pay DISTRICT, upon execution of this agreement, the 12, one time cash sum of $2,000.00, the agreed upon amount necessary 13 14to cover DIS@LRICTIS costs incurred in the preparation, processing 15and administration of this agreement. 162. Secure all necessary licenses, agreements, permits 17and rights of entry as may be needed for the operation and ismaintenance of PROJECT, including, but not limited to, such 20licenses, agreements, permits or rights of entry as may be 21required from CITY and the California State Department of 22Transportation ("Caltrans"). DEVELOPER shall furnish DISTRICT 23 p-ior- to DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT for operation and 2 z' maintenance with sufficient evidence of DEVELOPER having secured 25 such necessary licenses, agreements, permits and rights of enzry, 26 as determined and approved by DISTRICT. 27 28 3 3 Uoon acceptance of all "on-si-@e" szreet: 2! O.L way by CITY as deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for the ooe--aL--ion and maintenance of PROJECT but prior to DISTRICT 411 51! acceptance of PROJECT for operation and maintenance, conv-3,,@ or 6 cause to be conveyed to DISTRICT: (a) Flood control easement (s) inc7-ud'L incress and egress, in a form approved bv DISTRICT, the rights of way as shown in conce@t cross- hatched in red and in conceidt c--oss-hatched in 2 blue on Exhibit "El' attached hereto and made a 13 part hereof; 15 (b) Fee simple title to the rights of way as shown 16 in concept shown in blue on Exhibit "Bl'; 17 (c) Easement(s), for ingress and egress purposes, in a form approved by DISTRICT for the rights of way as shown in concept cross-hatched in 20 21green and in concept cross-hatch ed in blue on 22Exhibit "Bl'; and 2 (d)Flood and inundation easements, including ingress and egress, for the rights of way 2 5determined by DISTRICT to be subjec-- to 7flooding and inundation in a once in one 4 hundred year frequency flood even--, as shown 2 concept cross-hatched in purple on Exhibi@ attached hereto and made a oart hereof, and with DEVELOPERIS commitment to ma4rta4- "-)e hydraulic capacity of the easement- b,@ of 7 the corresponding covenants included easement deed. 94. At the time of recordation of the convevancin- docu- ment(s) set forth in Section I.3., furnish DISTRICT with policies of title insurance, each in the amount of not less than twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) for each easement parcel to oe 15 con-veyed to DISTRICT, and a policy of title insurance in the 16, amount of not less than fifty thousand ($50,000.00) for each fee 17 parcel to he conveyed to DISTRICT, guaranteeing DISTRICTIS i :1 interest in said property as being free and clear of all liens, 20encumbrances, assessments, easements, taxes and leases (recorded ,2iand unrecorded), and except those which, in the sole discretion off 221DISTRICT, are acceptable. 23 5. Assume sole ownership and resdonsib@-litv for the 211, operation and maintenance of PROJECT, until such time that PROJECT; 25 ownersh 4p is accepted by DISTRICT as set forth in Section -LV.l. 26 11 herein. 271 6.Pay, i4 suit is brought upon this contrac- or an%, 2 bond guaranteeing completion of PROJECT, all costs and reasonable 3 4:expenses and fees, including reasonable a@.tornevs, fees, and 5 acknowledge that, upon entry of judgmen,@-, all such costs, exnenses 6 and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in anv judament-- 17 rendered. 9 8. Furnish DISTRICT with final mylar plans for joi@ and assign their ownership to DISTRICT. SECTION II ij 12 li DISTRICT shall: 1.Upon execution of this agreement, record or cause to 14 II 15be recorded,.a copy of this agreement in the Official Records of 16the Riverside County Recorder. 17 2. Accept ownership and responsibility for the 18 operation and maintenance of PROJECT, excluding the two-existing ,0 boxes located in Caltrans and CITY rights of way, at Interstate 15 201 1 and Ynez Road respectively, and excluding all PROJECT inlets and 21 4' 2 connector pipes within CITY street rights of way, upon (i) 23 DISTRICT acceptance of the construction of PROJECT as being ,2 complete, (ii) recordation of the conveyancing documents described' 25 in Section I.3., and (iii) acceptance of all necessary street 2 5 17rights of way by CITY as deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for, 6 the operation and maintenance of PROJECT. 2 3. Keep an accurate accountingof all DISTRICT construction inspection costs, and within (45) davs 4' 5 at-r-er DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT as being comoler-e, su!Dm-'-t a 6 cost statement: to DEVELOPER. If inspection costs ha-@,-e e.@-eede@- the decosi@ as set forth herein, DEVELOPER shall aa-@ the 9additional amount as may be deemed necessary by DISTRT@- to co-1;,ei- its inspection costs, upon demand by DISTRICT. If -.he deidcsj- exceeds said inspection costs, DISTRICT shall reimburse DEVELOPER I 12 the excess amount within sixty (60) days after DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT as being complete. 74 4.Provide CITY with duplicate "as-built" mylar plar 15 16for all PROJECT facilities constructed within CITY rights of way, 17upon DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT as being complete, SECTION III 201@ CITY shall: 21 1. Grant DISTRICT, by execution of this agreement, the 22right to operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights of way as, 23 set forth herein. 24 2.Accept ownership and responsibility for the 25 !I I operation and maintenance of all PROJECT i-niets and connector 26 27pipes within CITY rights of way, upon DISTRICT acceptance o-@ 28 7 PROJECT as being complete. 2SECTION TV 4@iIt is further mutually agreed: 51. All work involved with PROJECT was inspected 1),,- 6; DISTRICT but shall not be deemed complete until aoz)roved and accepted as comolete by DISTRICT. 2.DEVELOPER and DISTRICT, knowingly and 9 10,waive the provisions of Government Code Section 65913.8, relat@-na to fees and charges. Such waiver is accomplished with the -12understanding that DISTRICT is voluntarily undertaking the 'L4obligation to accept ownership and responsibility -'or the operation and maintenance of PROJECT, and DEVELOPER is not 15 16required by DISTRICT to enter into this agreement. 17 3. DEVELOPER shall, until DISTRICT accepts PROJECT for- 18@ 1 operation and maintenance: 19 20 (a) Provide and maintain comprehensive liability 21 insurance coverage which shall protect 22 DEVELOPER from claim from damages for personal 23 1 in3ury, including accidental and wrongful death, as well as from claims for property 25 damage which may arise from DEVELOPERIS 26 27 construction of PROJECT or the performance of its obl-gations hereunder, whether such construction or performance be by DEVELOPER any ccnt--acl@or, subcon-.rac--cr, or bv anyone 11 employed directly or indirectly bv a-.v ol@ 6 Such insurance shall name DISTRICT and as 7 additional insureds with res-aec- to -h4s agreement and the obligations of D-@V7-LOPE,@ hereunder. Such insurance shall provide @-C-- limits of not less than two million dollars -12 ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence. (b) Cause its insurance carrier(s) to furnish L 151 DISTRICT and CITY, upon request, with 16 certificates of insurance showing that such 17insurance is in full force and effect and that isDISTRICT and CITY are named as additional 20insureds with respect to this agreement and the obligations of DEVELOPER hereunder. Further, 21 22said certificates shall provide that the 2issuing company shall aive DISTRICT and CITY 2sixty (60) days written notice in the event of 2:;any cancellation, termination, non-renewal or 26reduction in coverage c-L- the policies evidenced 27 9 2by the certificates. in the even-. of an,,, such cancellation, te--minaticn, ncn---enewal cr 4@ireduction in coveraue, DEVELOPER shall, forthwith, secure replacement insurance mee--i-.-,@ 6;the provision of this paractrach. Failure to maintain the insurance b@z zi--'-s 9paragraph shall be deemed a material breach of this agreement. 4.In the event that any claim or legal action is brought against DISTRICT or CITY in connection with this agreement' 2because of the actual or alleged acts or omissions by DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT and CITY 15harmless therefrom, without cost to DISTRICT or CITY. Upon 16@DEVELOPERIS failure to do so, DISTRICT and CITY shall be entitled 7to recover from DEVELOPER all of their cost and expenses, isincluding, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys, fees. 205. DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT 21and CITY, their respective officers, agents, employees and 22iindependent contractors free and harmless from any claim 23whatsoever, based or asserted, pu--suant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United 5States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose anv other liability or damage whatsoever, for the design, 10 cons ruc@ion or Iaiiure of PROJECT or from the diversion o;' -he 2! waters from the natural drainage patterns, save and except cIL@. 4and litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole wi_ 1 1 -FU, 5 mi. sconduc,,- of DISTRICT or CITY. DEVELOPER shall- E-LSTRICT and CITY without cost to DISTRICT or CITY, and uaon E)E'@LOP7-.@'S '7 failure to do so, DISTRICT and CITY shall be entitled to recover 8 9from DEVE 7 OP7R all of their cost and expenditures, includ@-nal but -0 not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees. 6.DEVELOPER for itself, its successors and assigns 1-2 hereby releases DISTRICT and CITY, their respective l@ agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, 15 or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, including, i 16 not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, 171 pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution 1and the F4-fth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any 20other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, for the design, construction or failure oz 2 22PROJECT, or the discharge of drainage within or from PROJECT. 23 Nothi-ng contained herein shall constitute a release bv IDEVE7.OPER 07DISTRICT or CITY, their officers, agents and emidlovees from any; 2 and a!'- claims, demands, actions or suits of anv kind arisi-na out for the negligent maintenance o-@ PROJECT, after an@,,, 27 (D ;i the acceptance of PROJECT by DISTRICT. 21 7.Any waiver bv DISTRICT or by CITY of any breach of 4any one or more of the terms of this agreement s.,-all not ]De construed to be a waiver c@' any subsecruenl-- or other breach 0- the 6 same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the card of DIS-_@7CT! 7 or CITY to require exact, full and comz)lete compliance w@-t'@ an-,, 9terms of this agreement shall not be construed as in anv manner changing the terms hereof, or estopp@na DISTRICT or CITY _F_-om enforcement hereof. 2 8. If any provision in this agreement (with the exception of Section IV.2.) is held by a court of competent 4 15jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining 16provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being 17impaired or invalidated in any way. Should it be held by a court 18 of competent jurisdiction that any portion of Section IV.3. is 19 20invalid, void or unenforceable, the provisions of Government Code 2165913.8(b) shall apply. It shall, therefore, be determined that 22this fee is extended through the year 1998. 2 9. This agreement is to be construed in accordance w4-thi@@ ID 4 tfte iaws of the SI--ate of California. 2:) 10.Any and all notices sent o- required to ]De sen- zo 26 2, the idart-;es of this agreement will be mailed by ---sr- class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEMEI--ULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive 4 Post Office Box 1033 Temecula, CA 9z@-390 Riverside, CA 92502-1033 5 ADVANCED CARDIOVASCU,@ SYSTEMS 26531 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92390 12.Any action at law or in equity brought @v anv of --he@ 9 parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a rictht or rigntis 11 provided for by the agreement shall be tried in a court of 1 competent jurisdiction in the County of-Riverside, State of 12 1 California, and the zarties hereto waive all provisions oL law providing for change of venue in such proceedings to any other 15 i county. 16 13. This agreement is the result of the negotiations 17 78between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their 19respective counsel. @he fact that this agreement was prepared as 20a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or 21significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement 22@shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT Dre@ared 23@ 2@this agreement in its final. form. 25!14. The rights and obligations of DEVELOPER shall inure --o and be binding uuon all heirs, successors and assianees. 27i @-3 11 not assign or otherwise tran 15.DEVELOPER sha szer a-.,,, 2of their rights, duties or obligations hereunder to any person or 4entity without the written consent of the other mar-@4---s hereto 5 i being first obtained. In the event of any such trans--cer or 6 assignment, DEVELOPER expressly understands and act-ees --at t:hev 7 @l shall remain liable with respect to any and all of --.@-e and duties contained in this agreement. 9 13 16. This agreement is intended by the part-'-es hereto as 11 a final expression of their understanding with reszect to the 12 subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement C.Ll 4: 73 It--he terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all @rior 14 11 and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written in connection therewith. This agreement may be changed or modified only udon the written consent of the parties hereto. 15 19 20 21 22 2 .2 5 2,3 27 22- CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C\- County of On l@ before me, 3A7E personally appeared personally known to me - OR proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi to be the erson@. whose name".---s re p a subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to the same i she/thev executed /herl'their authorized capacity"@), and that b his her,itheill signature'K on the instrument the person(,,t or the entity upon behalf of which the personl@ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LEE ANN DOLPH z IC3.3597 z otary @lic - California COUNTY SIGNATURE OF Car- @re3 JUL 3 1. IQ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattanment of this iorm. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITL@ OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITL-=(S) PARTNER(S) F7 LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NU@IBER OF PAGES i-RUST@@(SI) GUARDIANI,'CONSE:;VATOR OT@EP- DATE OF DOCUMEN7 SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: SIGNIER(IS', OTHER TH,4i\J NArviED ABOVE -@1993 NATIONAL,\107AR'-' -kSSCCIATIO.14 - 8236 Remmet @.,Ye., P C 2cx 71 8-1 - Can,-ga Park, CA @l -I-)@-71 @-I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have e.-cec,,--- 2il this agreement on (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5 Ev DAVID P. ZAPPE Chairman, Board of Sur)erv4-sors Interim General Manager-Chief Engineer 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN GERALD A. MALONEV- County Counsel Clerk c@L the Board v By Deputy., Deputy '2 Dated 2. (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF TEMECULA 15 DV City Engineer City Manager 16 t 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: 18 By City Attorney By City Clerk 19 20 ]Dated (SEAL) 21 ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, a California 22@ c orpor@on 23 BY. 2 TitieZ 25 26 B y 271 Title SC--:mc-@:slj (NOTARY) 15 VICINRTY MAP Uff -7 4 END RCFC EXMNNC 7 X WCO PROJECT 2= la, x 51 Ka C(ISTINC OSL a, Q@ 72@ E3EGI WCO PROJECT C13 ui LOCATION MAP *! 9 .> LAIizcn= EXHIBIT A -1 Z-D -1 z@ -3 Ad.S. 119136-J9 RIV. CO. L-252.79 T-127.11 i.00 ACRES 4J,478 SO. FT. SEE DETAIL "A POIIVT OF BEGINNING N 47'16'51 13.50- w DETAIL S@: I" - 50' 0-09'17'02" R-IOJO.00' L-166.90' T-4i.6i, Ch"Na -i -D -1 1-@ A4.8.lt9l36-J9 RIV. CO. 651' W 8.50' PRD2ARED UNDER 7NE' SUP OF- w Ms -ok a47F I/ i EXHIBIT B I Of 6 115/34 are 2 2. 2 7' EXHIBIT B 2 of 6 CHANNEL A4.B. ii9l36-39 RIV CO. S 4 7'1651" E ii.00, N 42-4J'C:- 8.50, 6@ 47"16'51" C' 0.20 ACRES 8,616 SQUVW FEE7 A4.B. 119IJ6-J9 RIV. CO. No EXHIBIT B 3 of 6 C3 7ri@ sip - 7,9 ,JOHAI T. 951,VH417, #7 EXHIBIT B 4 of 6 /iV4T NO. 7 0 7 8 8 '?O- 9,3 EXHIBIT B 5 of 6 r c r ,EASEM,CAlr EXHIBIT B 6 of 6 '01'45'6 K.O. 59' 5.11'04'ZI'XI - I /0 2'.i' 07' rr, 3 04' Al.45-57-40-5 7'0 7'W 49'Z5VI" '26'06 19 58'- 50' ,V 4(. -39 5,43,za.,34 A/ 35.4t3 7/. 1 Z' W43' 6 7 - 756 IAI T R,5 7-,4 7-@ 15 EXHIBIT C I 4n f O> 4 w -F@ C 4?. 80' 6,05,56 - W. 55.19' 6'7 @-3 C 41.64' S,?9,5c"15 51. 7' 5 Z,?'19'13 4'*;41 '31'20"w ed EXHIBIT C 2 of 2 ITEI\4 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT(D@F CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Parcel Map No. 27987-1 (located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen Way - Vail Ranch Commercial Ctr.) PREPARED BY: teven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE Parcel Map No. 27987-1 subject to the Conditions of Approval, and the Developer providing proof of payment of property taxes and any special assessments prior to release of the map for recordation. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27987 (PA95-0097)was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 6, 1995. A revised phasing map was subsequently approved by the Planning Director on July 26, 1995. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Parcel Map No. 27987-1 contains 1 1 commercial parcels within 21.26 gross acres. The parcel map is located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen Way. This map is part of the Vail Ranch Commercial Center as approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission. The Developers are LandGrant and Old Vail Partners. Condition No. 23 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27987 states that any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the map. As stated in the attached letter, the Developer, LandGrant, is requesting that the City Council approve the final map at this time in order to facilitate funding of the project. Property taxes and any special assessments will be paid after receipt of funding but prior to release of the map for recordation. The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map 27987-1: Stephen's K-Rat Fee Due prior to 1 st Grading Permit Public Facilities Fee Due prior to Building Permit Signal Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit Fire Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit r:\agd rpt\9 6\0423\pm27987 1 map The following bonds have been posted for Parcel Map No. 27987-1: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monum@n Street and Drainage $220,500 $110,250 Water $304,500 $152,250 Sewer $111,000 $ 55,500 $636,000 $318,000 Survey Monuments $8,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Development Fee Checklist 2.Vicinity Map 3.Copy of Sheet 2, Parcel Map 27987-1 4.Fees and Securities Report 5. Letter from LandGrant dated April 10, 1996 regarding payment of property taxes -2- r:\agdrpt\9 6\0423\pm27 987 1 map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Parcel Mai) 27987-1 The following fees and deposits were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Condition of Approval Habitat Conservation Plan Condition No. 33 (Plot Plan) (K-Rat) Due Prior to 1 st Grading Permit Parks and Recreation n/a (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Condition No. 37 Due Prior to Building Permit Public Facility Condition No. 72 Due Prior to Building Permit Fire Protection Mitigation Condition No. 122 (Plot Plan) Letter dated 1-5-95 Flood Control (ADP) n/a Letter dated 1 1-1 0-94 -3- r:\agdrptk96kO423\pm27987 l.map RC p p(-) I C'@ I- ùI SITE '7@ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE EA V) cn r u t! (L -C 9z LI E/) LM Rs U CO co z z r WAY C, MAp tio, 2005 coumm Mg 236125-27 TRACR AIAP NO. . of I 04B 246133-3 'K IE ai cc zi it CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP 27987-1 DATE: April 23, 1996 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 220,500 $ 110,250 Water 305,500 152,250 Sewer 111,000 55,500 TOTAL s 636,0001 $ 318,000 Maintenance Retention $ 63,600 Monument Security $ 8,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES (PA95-0097) City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs $ N/A RCFCD Drainage Fee - n/a $ N/A Fire Mitigation Fee - deferred $ T.B.D.* Signal Mitigation Fee - deferred $ T.B.D.* Road and Bridge Benefit Fee $ N/A Other Development Fees $ T.B.D* SERVICE FEES (LD95-003MP) Planning Fee $69.00 Comprehensive Transportation Plan $4.00 Plan Check Fee $1,050.00 Inspection Fee $ N/A Monument Inspection Fee $400.00 Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review) $ N/A Fees Paid to Date $1,523.00 Balance of Fees Due $0.00 IT.B.D. - To be determirwd -4- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pm279871.rnap lwednesday Apri I 10, 1996 10:02m -- from 16191 -- Page 1 1 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7021 ; 4-10-9B ;12:16PM 619-+ 909 694 6475;# 1 R l@E APR LANDGITANT l@ sidtc 212 gal3o T (619) 481@ T (619) 491-3106 sent Via Facsimile April 10, 1996 Mr. iimk Paul Engineering Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re:Project-. Vail-Ranch Center item: Final Map Approval bear Jim, This letter will confirm that the City of Temecula has agreed to allow our final parcel map to proceed to City Council on April 23, 1996 for final approval on the condition that we will pay off the past due assessments and real estate taxes prior to the recordation of the map. ' Attached is a memo from the County of Riverside estimating the past due assessments th2Lt will be paid prior to the recordation of the map in may, 1996. I understand this is not standard operating procedure for the City. We appreciate the City working with us to expedite our shopping center development which will benefit the Southern Temecula residents. our construction lender did not want to fund the loan until the.final map was ready to record. The source of paying off the back taxes will be the construction loan. Jim, if you have any quBBtions, please give me a call. sincerely, Chris Smith, Executive Vice President Attachment cc:C. Samuel Marasco Chip Swanson /koh RLF- VAILAC: WW. CrrY OF TEMECULA N.@VAILAC,JFAULCSS lwednesday Aprit 10, 1996 10:02wn -- From 16191 -- Page 21 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7021 ; 4-10-96 ;12:16PM 61 909 694 6475;# 2 FA)( COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMEDIATE DELIVERY DATE: March 29, 1990 4:53 pm Totiki On '&: go (inowing Cmw TO:Chris Smtth Land0rant Developmiont T&WOZ.- (610)481-3108 FROM:Suzette @rnons (909)275-1112 CEO Per our discussion on March 28, 1996, the following Is the total special taxes due by May 30, 19N: Aj"ssment District 159 Vail Rench LTD(Formally Old VoU @eral APN- 950-110-014-7 92/93 Judgermnt $167,326.50 93-96 Delinquency $483,930-09 Sheriff Advance 800.00 Post Judgernant Attorney Cost 94,40.00 Tntsi Dun bx Mmy 30, 1995 Make chick payable to: First Trust California Send check to-. Albort A. Webb & Anoc@ P.O. Box 723 Rivwside, CA 92602 ITEIN4 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIR CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Acceptance of Drainage Easement in portion of Tract 22916-3 and Quitclaim to Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. (Northwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63 IN TRACT NO. 22916-3) BACKGROUND: The City Council of the City Temecula approved Tract Map No. 2291 6-3 on September 20, 1 990. An offer for a drainage easement was not accepted at the time of the map approval. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has requested that the City of Temecula now accept the offer for the drainage easement and authorize Quitclaim of any and all rights to easement acquired by the City of Temecula to the DISTRICT. r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63 The DISTRICT will then maintain the storm drain systems which were approved and inspected by the DISTRICT in accordance with Developer-DISTRICT-City agreement executed November 27, 1990. The subject locations are included with this Staff Report. The legal description is on attachments (Exhibits 'A' and "Bm) to City Council Resolution No. 96- FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits 'A-B', inclusive. Quitclaim Form (DISTRICT) (on file) r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TENMCULA, CALIEFORNIA, ACC G AN OFFER OF E,KSEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACIL MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMEECULA, AND ALTTHORIZING QLTITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63 IN TRACT NO. 22916-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: @REAS, The City Council did not accept an offer of dedication of a drainage easement for the construction and maintenance of drainage facilities on Tract Map No. 22916-3; and, RFAS, The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has requested that the City of Temecula accept the said offer of dedication as set forth above, and to authorize the quitclaim of said offer to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts the offer of dedication and authorizes the quitclaim of said easement to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, JuneS. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 96-was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meetingthereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63 EXMIT "A" TO RESOLLMON NO. 95- Accepting Easement for construction and maintenance of drainage facilities as shown on L4ot No. 62 and 63 of Tract NUp No 22916-3, Filed in Book 225 of Maps, Pgs 57-64 Ind, as Recorded September 31, 1990. r:Nagdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- 'F' ZAMOIZA "G' IARIZir. ZIP -3 TRACT NO. IA. Ioo "MT "M F*OST I A-S=l@TES PA UB A 11.2 42 41@ 4 lee 55 NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE LEGEND EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCNON AND M NANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO BE ACCEPTED BY 7'517'E CITY OF CULA AND THEN @111111-14 QUrrCLAD,IED TO THE VICINFY MAP RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL A@ND W.-KTER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. ITEIN4 21 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE D CITY MAN@ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Amendment to Staff Report: Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Margarita Road and State Route 79 (South), Project No. PW95-15 PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appropriate $45,000 in Signal Mitigation Funds from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital Improvement Project Fund. BACKGROUND: On March 12, 1996, City Council approved the award of contract for the construction of the Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and SR 79(S). This project includes installation of a four (4) way fully actuated traffic signal, minor roadway modifications, and signing and striping. The agenda report dated March 12, 1996, is being amended to appropriate the additional funds required for this project. The appropriation of $45,000 covers the construction contract of $141,676.50 plus ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $14,167.55, for a total amount of $155,844.1 5. This represents the total cost and contingencies. Per the cooperative agreement with Riverside County, 25% of the above costs will be reimbursed by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is funded by Signal Mitigation Funds for the Development Impact Fund, and appropriated in Account No. 210-165-645-5804. There is currently $111,516.00 in the account which was appropriated through Fiscal Year 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program. Attachment: Contract r. \agdrpt\96\04 23\pw95-1 5. amd/AJP ITEI\4 22 APPROVAL CITYATTORNEY DI' R OF FIN4 CITYMANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Support of AB 3382 RECOMMENDATION: 1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING AB- = WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION. BACKGROUND:The California Constitution vests the exclusive right and authority to license and regulatethe manufacture, sale, purchase, possession, and transportation of alcoholic beverages inthe state. Existing law prohibit local ordinance restricting concurrent sales of alcohol and fuel, if the jurisdiction allows the retailing of gas and alcohol in separate sites. Only those that cities have valid conditional use permits (CUP) regulating concurrent sales of alcohol and gas prior to the passage of the 1986 law are allowed to regulate those establishments. AB 3382 would repeal the prohibition, thereby allowing cities to adopt conditional use permits regulating the concurrent sale of motor fuel and alcohol for off-premise consumption. AB 3382 would allow the City of Temecula to regain local control over concurrent sales. In the face of increasing awareness of the problems associated with drunk driving, shouldn't local community leaders be able to decide if concurrent sales makes sense for a particular location? The City of Temecula says "Yes," and supports AB 3382. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this action. R:@IER-DN,REPORT,STAFF3 I.MIS RESOLUTTON NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF CULA SUPPORTING AIR 3382 WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION. TIRE C= COUNCEL OF THE CRIY OF ULA DOES RESOLVE, DE I AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: AS, existing laws prohibit local ordinance restricting sales of fuel and alcohol; and, WHEREAS, there seems to be an inherent inconsistency codified in state law that allows the motoring public to buy cold alcoholic beverages and then drive away; and, WHEREAS, AR 3392 will give the City of Temecula the ability to regulate concurrent sales. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 1:The City Council does support AR 3392. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the nairnes of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:@IERDA\P,EPOR@AFF31.Mis PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of _, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A@T: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF I]DE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO Y CERTIIFY that Resolution No. 96- - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the -th of _, 1996, by the following vote: AYM: COUNC ERS: NOES: COUNC ERS: ABSENT: COUNC ERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:@TEP,DA\P,EPOR'RSTAFF31,MIS TEMECULA COMN4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT . ITEA4 1 7 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:35 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Vice President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Ford, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3, with President Roberts abstaining on Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone 1 Minutes 1.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996. AYES: 2 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts Minutes.csd\040996 1 2Aareement for July 4th Fireworks Show 2.1Approve agreement with Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of Temecula's July 4th Fireworks Show. 3Accel2tance of Grant Deed for City Park Site - Kemper Real Estate Development Corporation (La Serena Way) 3.1Accept the Grant Deed from Kemper Real Estate Development corporation (KRDC, Inc.) To the City of Temecula for the donation of a 2.8 acre park site adjacent to Rancho elementary School on La Serena Way. 3.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Grant Deed. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4Temecula Duck Pond Master Plan Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson introduced Development Services Administrator Phyllis Ruse. Ms. Ruse presented the staff report, explaining the process for developing the master plan. She introduced Vince DiDonado of the Alhambra Group, who outlined the specific design components. President Roberts opened the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, President Roberts closed the public hearing at 7:50 PM. It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1Adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for the Temecula Duck Pond Master Plan. 4.2Approve the Master Plan for the Temecula Duck Pond. 4.3Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the Temecula Duck Pond. The motion was unanimously carried with Directors Birdsall and Stone absent. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director of Community Services Nelson reported that the annual Easter Egg Hunt was held Minutes.csd\040996 2 at two locations on Saturday, April 6, 1996, in which 2,500 people attended. He reported that next year, three locations will be utilized.. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Ford, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:52 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Birdsall and Director Stone absent. Ron Roberts, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, Board Secretary/ City Clerk Minutes.csd\040996 3 ITEIN4 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE)( DIRECTOR OF Fl CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:Board of Directors FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Release of Bond for Tract 25004-1, Barclay Estates (Seraphina Road at Jons Place) PREPARED BY:eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors: Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of the TCSD slopes and landscaped area within Tract No. 25004-1, Barclay Estates. BACKGROUND:On January 10, 1995, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: JLD Properties 22865 Lake Forest Drive El Toro, CA 92630 for the construction of slope and landscape areas within Tract No. 25004-1. On May 23, 1 995, the Board of Directors accepted Tract No. 25004-1 into the City's landscape maintenance program beginning Fiscal Year 1 995-96. On October 10, 1 995, the Board of Directors reduced the Faithful Performance Bond to a 1 0% warranty amount. The remaining surety bonds, issued by the Developers Insurance Company, are identified as follows: 1 . Labor and Materials Bond No. 17271 3S in the amount of $1 0,000.00. 2. Faithful Performance Bond No. 1 7271 3S in the amourit of $2,000.00. Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be released six months after the satisfactory completion and acceptance of the slope areas, pending the settlement of any claims or obligations by the developer. The City Clerk has verified that no claims have been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the construction of the slope areas. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this project. The remaining 10% warranty amount will be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. r:\yasinobk\barclay.i&m 042396 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Copy of Labor and Materials Bond. r:@yssinobk\barelay.l&m 042396 BOND NO. 1727 l@'S 0 SC LAPOR @.i@ 30i@ C, r- -t t 7- -,I 0 ?-N; I _-_, - t@-- C'- !a, Stacc o@ C C--N7@- P'@TNERSHIP (hcrcinar-Le.- dtsicnat--@ as "Pi-',nc,,'oal") hav ed 'IZ[o A P=c@,-oL agT---s to irs@ @-id. cc,-zQ!eCe cti-@ Par@d L-npi-ove,-ntics, which sa-id dait@-'/4A/t,Ak'ci /0 19 @5 , and Id-,ot @ as P,-oiel.: TP-ACT ,'@'25004 is h--:-@bv :-cfe=ed to and Trade a @ar, and 7@ @6.S, u,-ide,- 'Llit t--.=s of @d A,,-,.ezmenl,, Pr,@cipa-I is :--Culred before crit--.'=LY the work, to file a -ood and sui@-ic' 'L i,ijori the per-:o=anc-- c- L ient oavment )ond with Lh c C'@y c to secure the cl;li"-Ls to which reference is 7, a in L -om.Lnenc:A-icr LIOLI de ' Title 15 (- @ with sec" 308--,) of Pa.-L 4 al' Division of the Civil Code of the State of CalZo @'a; and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE we the principal a--Lid COMPANY as Silreif, arc held @-ici bound unto the C:7 rj' Temecula, Caiifornia, a-ad a.U contractors, subcontractors, labore,L-s. -maten'alLien, and other persons employed in the iderformanc-- of the aforesaid -Tc--=er:z a.7.--: to "-,-I --tie 15 of the Civil Code, Lr- tht @en;, I sum o 0 m o r,. c,,, o l@ , h @ -C,, ri@: -@- S La tz s, f o r a,. a t t L", Pt s Lu L-M'sh@ or labor- 'Lhe:-con of any kind, o.-,L@or amounts the U:aemoloym----t @ur-azct Act wl[,-i to s-Licil Woi-7- or- labo:-,. that SureL-f Fiji s=--in an = o Li r,,L 7c,L --xct--@z the amount set for-Lh. aai- o I:' the obLiz::_,-iori s----urt@ he:-cb@, and 'La addiu'o[i ,o the fact a=our@t su----L:icc 4 _Z,4 Ec-,zo@a'D!-- L as ilicu=--d by 'LZ@ succ2s @ I-; caf,-)rc'LZ- sLic'-- obli(zation, 'Lo cos:s and L-ic,Llic'ez' in anv jLd2cnenL re.,idc,-ed. ex-or--ssl.y sLiDulat@ ar-d a-@ :hat ci@, bor:d si irs'Lirt to be::-@,: c).: and ail com:)aiu'--s and comor-,-zions enrill@ to fL7c c; s un6t.- (c m -@ n c:'2 zI :,t,, S ?- c,:i c n 3 0o L@ P art 4 c f I) 1,1, I s I o n -@, o -ir t i: e Cv ii C os cs z c z':,; -v su;t brol-,zht udcri tl-'s bond. ac-;Lon to tlac.-n or tile;r ar- If condition o-FtLs bcad is je@Lorm--@-, 'then tl-L:Ls state o -27:t =C t-- 7-7-1.,t surety stimulates and az-rzts 'that no t--@acL7e, of @i t, ol- addition to the te=s of the Acrezment or to the work to be per,-o=ed ther--,-,nd--:- or the -@--,L7icaL,cns accomr)myino,- the same sha.U 'La ar@yway a:-iec-,.its obligations on ties i)onc:. anc does hereby waive r-otic-- of any such chan-es, extension of @e, alteration or addition to the tt=s of A,--.-ztnr or to the worl- or to the specifications. @S OF, tLs instruml enc has been dul-v exe--uc@ by the P '=cl:Dai and above n=td, on DEC@ER !4rh 19 94 s (Seai) D-7VELO@ INSU@-NCE C P.@0?7 FOR-NII C-7N7pA7 <- -2 3y: B URENO At::ornev-In--7act Z.@ERi)L. -A-PPROV= AS TO FORM: Scot-L F. Field Ciry ArLomey 3 STATT OF Calif ornia Ss. COUNI@'OF San Bernardino On Dece-n:)er IA, 199z, before me, MICKAEL J. HENSEL PEI',SONAL'LIY APPEA@-D E. URELQO personally known to me (or pro%,eci to me on the basis of satist I actor-,, evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/',i@-e sub scribed to the within instrument and acknowl- e,jl,cd to me trial, he /s,'-ie/Lliev executed the same L -i his/ I iierl"their iuthorizcd cap-icity(ies), and that bv his/her/ %i-.'l C HA@ EL the r s -@aLure(s) on the instrument the persoii(s), or the en.1v@@ uc)on 'L)el-,alf of which t.lie person(s) acted, executed NOTARI D'j3L;C u i-EN S + OPA@E r-@,,TY the instrument. My Co I-.95 WiTiNESS mv hand and official seal. Si-na@e Tltis arct7 for qqjcial Notarial Scal OPTIONAL Thouch the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL 1-1 CORPORATE OFFICER and Material Bond TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT LIM,[T=-D GENERAL One ORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBPR OF PAGES TRUST-@=-(SI, GUARDIAN/CONS@RVATOR OTHER: Dece,-iber 14. 199z, DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAMEC)P PE RSON(S) ORENTI-Y(IES) None :)EVE 7 OP7FS 7@NSU.@NCE CO@L@A-N',-' SIGN=-R(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOV=- ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOIVLEDGENIENT INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNI AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY @, IRVINE, CA 92713 (714) 263-'@1300 P,O. BOX 1972@ N,@ 9@9@64 7 :o,,Cr -.even granted SnE!l t.'l an@ eve.,i@ ze,,niraTr, or, :-ie i si of r c L;n ass :@e sea: 7E,,: C'@,vr" ir" S:Z: KNO@@,' A-L MEN 2Y HES=- PRESENTS. tl,.at. exceot as expressly finiled. INDEMNITY COM.;,Ati.Y C= :c,eraiiy, but no@r-,eec)@ rna),,e. constitute and appoint '*-SL'SANC.MONTEON,ALIC7-RODRIGIJ MIC.HELLEHA@@S7-,P-.'LJ'R @-@4 0, MIC,'IAFL j. HENSEL, JOINTLI- OR SEVER'@LLY--- tr,@e i,@ie ano law.ul A@ornevis@-in-Pa.-@. to make ex-cu,-, @-livE-, arc a.-Kpo-jeage for and on t)erialf of eac:, Z)! saic; corporations as sureties. n3-,cz anc ccnTa--:s c: su,etvs@-.,.- ir, an @-r,-ount not exceeciirg Two Million Five HLincrec 7not.-sanC Dollars (S2.500,OCO) in any single urcer,.aKing, givirg anc @-!c c :jii -,,Dwe- autrorit@ t@ co and to ceriorr-i every act necessary. requisite or prooer to be done in connection tnerewitn as eacri of said corporations coulo cc. out rese-vinc: @L, aC7 C7 sa,c corporations f@ll power of substitution and revocatior'. and all of tne acts of said Attorney@s)-In-Fac,,. pursuant to tt)ese presents. are meredv ratitiec anc -Ontirme@. 7he au-,-ority and cowers conferred by his Power of Attorney co not extend to ary of tr)e following bonds. undertakings or contracts of surerys,.iio Bank depositors boncs. mortgage Deficiency boncs. mortgage guarantee bonds, guarantees of installment paper. note guarantee bonds, bonds an financial institutions. lease bonds. nsurance company qualifying bonds, self-insure, s bonds, fidelity bonds or bail bonds. This Power of Attorney is granted a@ is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the tallowinc resolutions adoorec by @e respective Doa,cs ol D:@ez-,c,s c' INDEMN17Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA a,)c DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, effective as of Sectemoer 24 19@IE -E@ -ran of the @oarc. the President anc any Vice President of tne coroara:jo,,i be a-i@- na@ eac::, cl @em ,ere@v is, auz,@c-!-=- t -Z)L@'=-C) !na: tr)e Chair C, exec@:e Powers O' QualiNing -.@ atiornev@si named in trie Powers of Attorney to execute. on t)enalf of Ine corporation, bonds, undertakings and contracs of suretysn@D, anc tnat the Secretary or any Ass,s- tant Secretary of the corporation be, and each of tnem hereby is. autnorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney: R=-S@)LVED. FURTHER, trial the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile. and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such tacsir,,iile signatures shall be valid anc binding upon the corporation when so atfixec and in @e future wi@. rescec', to any bond, uncterlai(tric; or of suretyship to wnic', it is artacr)ec. @N WIT@@IESS WHEREOF, INDEMN17Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have @everally caused these presents to be signec oy ,esoec:- five Presidents anc attested nv their respective Secretaries tri:s I st day of April, 1993. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By By ATTEST A77ES7 Ev By Walter Crowell Walter Crowell Secretary Secretary STATE OF CALIFOR@NIA) Ss C-, A:)r:: ' 1993, before -e -!rese 7aafua. c)erso,)ailv ac:)eared C)anie V@ncenti. Jr. and Walter Crowell. personally Known to me (or provided to me on the basis of satisfactory E!@ cencei :@. @e tr)e rersonis@ wnose r,,ar,,iets@ is,are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledgec to me trial he/Sne/ttiey executed lrle sar.-ie in his/her/tieir autnorizea caDac,,,v(tes@l, ano Tna@ n, n,s/her/tr)e,r signa-,urelsi on the nstrumen, the @erson@s), or the entity upon benalf of which tne person@s) ac,,ec. executed Ine instrument rn, a7c ol,ciai seai O;:;:ICIA@ SEAL TIR-R_SA TAAFUA NOTA@ P'-'BLIC - CAL!FOR,@JiA @@RINCJPAL CR;:ICE IN + C--u.-4TY My co-mss,on Ez A@. 4, 1995 o CERTIFICATE a-Sen,or @,@,ce P@es C.,)@ of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Senior Vice Pres;cer,! of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, coes neret)y -- -72Z'eC erra anc: nas rc@ beer, eVOKc-c@ and tur,,r,.err,@iore. lna: trie :)rovisior-.s o' !he -esolutions of 'he rescec,,:ve ec@cS C, sa.c se! total @- :ne @c,-e, of A',,,ornev, are n force as of free date O' trtis Cer,,iticate Decembe-- Tr@,s Ceritf,cate s executed @r, ,.,ie C;rv of @r-vi,,)e, Cal;torr)ia, @is cay of . 199 IND' -Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By e iqel Se,n o, Vice President Senior Vice President I ITEA4 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fl CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 23, 1 996 SUBJECT: Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park Coscan Homes California, Inc. (Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY: @eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1 994, the Board of Directors entered into a Park Land/Landscape Agreement with: Coscan Homes Califronia, Inc. 12865 Pt. Del Mar, #200 Del Mar, CA 92014 for the construction of Nicolas Road Park, a 3.0 acre neighborhood park located at the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road. On October 10, 1995,the Board of Directors accepted the dedication of the park and subsequently exonerated the Faithful Performance Bond on October 1 7, 1 995. The remaining surety bonds, issued by The Reliance Insurance Company, are identified as follows: 1 .Labor and Materials Bond No. B2482314/11107 l,in the amount of $1 22,638.75. 2.Parkland Warranty Bond No. B248231 5/111072,in the amount of $24,527.75. Pursuantto the Park Land/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be released six months after the completion and acceptance of the park, pending the settlement of any claims or obligations by the developer. The City Clerk has verified that no claims have been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the construction of Nicolas Road Park. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this facility. The remaining Warranty Bond shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. r:\yasinobk\niclaprk.l&m 042396 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Labor and Materials Bond. r:\ynsinobk\nicisprk.l&m 042396 BOND NO. B2482314/111071 Premium:Included in Per'@'ormance Bond CITY OF CULA PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND MA BOND S, the City of Temecula, State of California, and COSCAN DAVIDSON HO,\IES(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement wherebv Principala--rees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements, which said Agreement. RORIPAUGH - NEIGHBORHOOD dat@August 23 19 94 , and identified as project PARK, TRACT 27827 is herebyreferred to and made a pan hereof; and S, under the terms -of said Agreement, Principal is required before enterinc, upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section im 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and RELIANCE INSU-@CE NOW, ORE, we the principal and COMPANY as Surety, are held and f@y bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, and other persons emploved in the performance of the aforesaid 122,638.75 ----- AL,r@ment and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of S/ , lawful monev of the United States. for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pav the same in an amount not exceedin- the amount set forth. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attomey's fees, incurred bv City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as I costs and included in any judgement rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of any and a.U persons,. companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to -ive a ri@ht of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in fuU force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNF-SS OF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Suretv above named, on AUGUST 10 19 94 2 (Seal) (Seai) SURETY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY PRINCIPAL COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES B . @ 1/1 KATSUKO TAKATA R. Bornemann (NAM:E) (NAM:E) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Sr. Vice President (TITLE) (TITLE) By: L) E.Dale Gleed (NAMT-) Director of Enqineering APPROVED AS TO FORM: rson C@ Attorney 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY S-i@kTE OF CALIFORNIA Count)! of SAN FRANCISCO On AUGUST 10, 1994 RATSLTKO TAKATA, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY before me, T.A. FE@IANICH, NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose namejs isare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heishe/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. T.A. FERMANICH COMM. #1010840 Signature (Seal) rCT4.RY PUBLIC-CALIFC)RNA C@ty & COulty ot San Franc;sro MY Comm. F-xDires Dec. 17. 1997 State of Califorilia Ss. ")Ulltv of e@ oil 1 7- before me, Notary Public, persondliy appeared pcrsoiialtv known to me (,&F pF@@4 te ;;;@ on iiie basis of to be the person(s') whose iiaiiie(s) @are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that iie,lsiie/thev executed the sailic in /tliclr authorized capacity(les), and that by their signatures on the instrument tile I)crsoii(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed tile instrument. WITN@S i-ny hand and official sea]. LYNN C NOR Sicyiiature (Seal) Cwm t 998758 PMUC - C"O"M Son @o @ Wm ExDon Jun. 27, 1 FD-1 (12/90) T)@'rL@CE INS@NCE CO.NfP@N-Y HEAD OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Sta, -f Pennsylvania. does hereby make. constitute and appoint Ketsuka Takata, individually, of Son Francisco, California, its true and lawt, Atiorney(s)-tn-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, and as its act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings or suretyship and to bind the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings anc other wrrtings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such officers. and hereby ratifies and confirms all.that its said Atiorney(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article Vil of the By-Laws of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY which became effective September 7, 1 978, which provisions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: ARTICLE Vil - EXECUTION OF BOt4DS AND UNDERTAKING 1 . The Board of Directors, the President, the Chairman of the Board, any Vice PreskWnL " Vice F'Te@errt or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and @hority 10 (at appoint Anorney(s)-ir,-Pac,, and IC) authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and under-takings, recognizances, contracts of fvty and Other writings c,',)Iigatory in the nature thereof, and (b) to remove any such Artorney(s)-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power a@ L fly @n to them. 2. Anorney(s)-i@oci shall have power and a@rity, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued lo tnem. to execute wW deirver on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contr@s of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The cocpcxate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings, recognizance&, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature @eol. 3. Artorneyis)-in-Faci OwO have poweir and y to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings and they shall also have power and authority to certify the financial statement of the Company and to copies of the By-Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. This Power of ATTo@y is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by @ority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY at a rneeting @ an the 5th day of June, 1979, at which a quorum was present, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: 'Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or any certificates relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such Power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which n is attached.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vic* President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, This 13 @ of October, 1993 RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF King Ss. On this 13 day of October, 1993 pesonally appeare rence W. Caristrom to me known to be the Vice Preskient of the RELIANCE INS no acknowledged that he executed and attested the foreooing instrLimenT and affixed the seal of said corpor r-ticie Vil, Section 1, 2, and 3 of the By-Laws of said Company,and tt)e Resolution, set forth therein, are still in ft L7 y Public in and for State of Washington siding at Sumner 1. Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of the RELJANCE INSI hereby certify Thai the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Power of Attorney executed by s@ REL@ ANY, which is still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hweunto set my hand and a ompany this 1 OTH day of AUGUST 19 9 4. Assistant Secretary ODR-1431 Ed 3/S3 0 ITEIN4 4 - i APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRI CITY MA AG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Award of Contract for Construction of Sports Park Creek Restoration (Project No. PW95-10CSD) PREPARED BY:Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the Sports Park Creek Restoration Project PW95-10CSD. 2.Award a construction contract in the amount of $195,059.00to R. K. Allen Landscape Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract. 3.Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $1 9,505.90 which is equal to 1 0% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On January 24, 1 995, the Board of Directors approved the Master Plan for the Parkview Site which included re-vegetation and stabilization of the slopes within the flood control channel at the Rancho California Sports Park. The portion of the creek to be restored lies south of Rancho Vista Road between the Community Recreation Center and the Skate Board Park. The Creek Restoration Project improvements will include landscaping along the channel slopes, slope protection, drainlines beneath the ball fields to reduce surface ponding and a decomposed granite pathway along the north channel bank adjacent to the existing baseball fields. A concrete walkway will be constructed adjacent to the decomposed granite pathway as a bid alternate. Improvements to the channel will aid in silt removal from final deposition into Lake Village. r:\agdrpt\96\0.423\pw95-IO.awd The engineer's base bid estimate for this project is $220,900. Ten bids for the project were publicly opened on April 1 1, 1996 and the results shown below include the base bid and the one alternate. 1. R. K. Allen Landscape $195,059.00 2. Oakridge Landscape $199,382.58 3. Pro-Civil Engineer Engineering $227,357.88 4. Wakeham-Baker $244,394.00 5. Mentone Turf $249,412.95 6. TNT Grading $249,555.50 7. Academy Development $288,760.50 8. Slater, Inc $289,145.00 9. Plaza Landscape, Inc $306,237.00 10. Sean Malek Engineering $320,657.50 Staff has contacted the State Contractors License Board and confirmed that the license is current and in good standing. '.;Ve have also contacted references supplied by R.K. Landscape Construction regarding the quality, timeliness and accuracy of previous work. We have received favorable comments from Government agencies for work of a similar scope. References contacted included the County of San Diego and the City of San Marcos. A total of 1 1 1 working days have been allowed for construction which is scheduled to begin in mid May of 1996 and be completed by early November 1996. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project will be funded by Development Impact Fees for Parks and a $100,000grant from the State Department of California Water Resources, $50,000 of which has already been received. The Development Impact Fees are budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1995-1996, Account No. 210-190-138-5804. The total project cost of $214,564.90 includes the contract amount of $195,059.00 plus the 1 0% contingency of $19,505.90. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Construction Contract r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-IO.awd ATTACHMENT1 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT -3- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-IO.awd CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23 day of April, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and R.K. Allen Landscape Construction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1 . a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD, SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications fnr Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, 'Standard Specifications') as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD, SPORTS PARK- CREEK RESTORATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW95-10CSD. Sports Park Creek Restoration. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be CONIRACT r: @cip\projects\pw95- 10\contmctiajp 0 used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish -all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. 3.CITY APPR@. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. 4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND FIFTY-NINE DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS ($195,059.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN (111) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. 5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS, LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a CONTRACT 2 r.\cip\projccu\pw95-10\contract/ajp sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMO@ RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE $25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3% $75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount in excess of $500,000 8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. CO,NTRACT 3 r: \cip kprojecta\pw95- I O\contmct/nip 10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1 773.8, 1 775, 1 776, 1 777.5, 1 777.6, and 1 81 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1 775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for anv ivork done jnder this Ccrtract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 1 1. TIME OF TH ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 1 3.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 1 5.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 1 6.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. CONI'RACT 4 r. \cip\proj@\pw95- I O\contmct/ajp 17.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21.ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. 22.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 431 74 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. L-d A T c-: D:CONTRACTOR R.K. Allen Landscape Construction Robert K. Allen 3589 Valencia Avenue San Bernardino, California 92404 By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE CONTRACT r: \cip\proj=w\pw95- 10\contmct/ajp DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT 6 r.@\projem\pw95-10\contmcttajp APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECvg - CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary Construction of the Parkview Fire Station began on January 3, 1 996. Great West Contractors is the general contractor for the project. The foundation has been poured and the next stage is the construction of the building. The Rancho California Creek Restoration Project bid opening is scheduled for April 1 1 , 1 996. Award of Contract will go to City Council on April 23, 1996 and construction will start in May 1 996. The City of Temecula and Union for a River Greenbelt Environment (URGE) have received a $50,000 grant toward this project from the California Department of Water Resources and will receive a second $50,000 grant upon completion of the construction. The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is nearing completion of construction. Upon completion, the project will enter a 90 day maintenance period. Staff anticipates this park will be open to the public in July, 1996. The improvements will include parking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skateboard facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system. On December 19, 1 995, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Mahr Construction for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project. The foundation has been poured and the masonry construction has begun. The Temecula Duck Pond Master Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on April 9, 1 996. As part of the overall Master Plan, the fencing at the park site was removed and replaced. The park is currently closed for turf renovations. The second submittal of construction documents, for the City Hall and Maintenance Yard Projects, were received the week of April 1, 1 996. The construction documents are currently in plan check and staff anticipates the project will go out to bid April 9, 1 996. It is anticipated that these projects will move forward on a similar time table and be completed in the fall, 1 996. R:,AIACENDASIDE@ 9,1996 Construction documents are also being prepared for Margarita Community Park. The first phase of the Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, and pedestrian walkways. The bid will also include additive alternates for a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and improvements to the adjacent school district baseball fields. Staff will bring forward a recommendation for a joint use agreement between the school district and the City for improvements to and maintenance of the fields. On February 27, 1 996, the Board of Directors approved the Acquisition Agreement for the Winchester Creek park site. A project design committee will be formed with members of the Community Services Commission, City Council, staff and the public. On February 27, 1 996, the Board of Directors approved the Acquisition Agreement for the Temecula Town Center and Rotary Park site. Staff is looking at various human services programs, which will be implemented when the City takes possession of this facility in September, 1996. R:'A\AGENDAMDE@ Ap.1 9,1996 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY . ITEA4 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:52 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Undemans ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTA None given. CONSENT CALENDAR. It was moved by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts AGENCY BUSINESS 2Purchase Agreement for 28535 and 28545 Puiol Street Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Minutes.rda\040996 -1- It was moved by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED OAGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIEIS LOCATED AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2.2Authorize the expenditures of up to $196,840 from RDA Housing set-aside funds for acquisition, relocation, and closing costs. 2.3Authorize the transfer of $170,000 from account 165-199-999-5449 to 165- 199-812-5804. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall 3Relocation A.Ssistance Services Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 3.1Authorize the execution of a contract with Pacific Relocation Consultants in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and Executive Director for the provision of relocation assistance services. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall Minutes.rda\040996 -2- 4Rancho West Apartments Project Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Ford to approve staff recommendations as follows: 4.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REGULATORY AGREEMENT WITH COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITIONS AND A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH BANK OF AMERICA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE 33334.14 4.2Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING THE SUM OF $150M,000 FROM THE AGENCIES LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND AS THE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE HOME PROGRAM GRANT FOR THE RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS PROJECT 4.3Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND THE LOAN OF THE PROCEEDS THEREOF TO COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITIONK, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall Minutes.rda\040996 -3- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:02 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 P.M., Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Chairperson Birdsall and Agency Member Stone absent. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Agency Secretary Minutes.rda\040996 -4- ITEIN4 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICFR@@ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Great Temecula Tractor Race RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members consider a request for sponsorship of the 1996 Great Temecula Tractor Race. DISCUSSION: Staff has received the annual sponsorship request in the amount of $10,000 from the Great Temecula Tractor Race, which is attached for your review. Due to the fact that this activity promotes tourism in Temecula, funding would come from the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. There will be no commissions paid out to any party for the City of Temecula's sponsorship. The Great Temecula Tractor Race encountered between 1 9,000 to 26,000 in attendance in previous years at each event. It draws entrants, spectators, and vendors from areas throughout California as well as fioi-n other states filling up local hotels and restaurants. The event brought into the community a large number of merchant sales and tax dollars, in addition to the tourism dollars earned supporting local merchants for goods and services used by the event. Last year the City of Temecula received wide spread media exposure from this event through newspaper, magazine, radio, and television coverage on local and national levels. Newspaper coverage on this event exceeded 2.6 million impressions and appeared in major newspapers as the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register, and the San Diego Union Tribune. Newspapers from Ventura County to the San Diego/Mexico Border, and all of the Desert Newspapers are included in the publicity blitz. The City of Temecula will be given a full page color ad in the Great Temecula Tractor Race brochure, in addition to the City's logo being placed on flyers that will be distributed to advertise this event. Various media stations in San Diego, Los Angeles and Riverside County will receive free promotional materials. The Tractor Race received magazine coverage equaling over 300,000 impressions and appeared in magazines as the San Diego Home and Garden, San Diego Business Journal, Los Angeles Reader, Country Review, and RV Magazine. Television coverage included major network stations as KALA, NBC - San Diego, KTTV - Fox, CBS/KNX Los Angeles, and KABC - Weekend Calendar. Radio coverage reached areas in Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, and Sacramento. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient monies are budgeted in the RDA to fund this request. ATTACHMENTS:Sponsorship Package for the City of Temecula Temecula Town Association Proposed 1996 Budget Marketing and Promotions - Television Publicity Radio Publicity Magazine/Newspaper Publicity ATTACHMENT SPONSORSEU PACKAGE FOR TITE CITY OF TEMECULA aCity representative invited to ride in the Grant Entry parade. .Complimentary general admission tickets. Twenty (20) each day. .Complimentary V.I.P. eight (8) tickets each day. .Eight (8) parking passes. .Right of first refusal for 1997 event. 0Full page color ad in the Great Temecula Tractor Race brochure. .City Logo printed on flyers for distribution. Various media stations in San Diego, Los Angeles and Riverside County to receive free promotional materials. Cost of Event Location Sponsorship Package: $10,000 ATTACMENT rp 2 6 lclq5 L-== TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATIOR -------------------- P.O. BOX 435 TEMECULA, CA 92593 DEPT. 3 PROPOSED 1996 BUDGET 199@ BUDGET INCOME ADMISSIONS 50,000 BEER/BAR 30,000 CARNIVAL 4,000 ENTRIES 5,000 EVENT PARKING 3,000 RV PARKING 1,000 PROGRAM 5,000 SOUVENIRS 2,5-@0 SPONSORS 35,000 VENDORS 15,000 CHILI COOK OFF 2,000 T KIDS FAIRE 3,000 TOTAL INCOME $155,500 EXPENS7-:-z ADV=-RTISING & PROMOTION $ 12,000 Aw'a=-nS 2,000 -? /Em= - 10,.000 C'H-77 COOK OFF 2,000 CCMI,!-T-cS!CNS -PFOGRAM 500 - SPIDN-CDF 500 4@000 DON@-77-ODIS - sr-@vicv- i.ooc, 12/000 "'.Z 7 N M 7 !-,I T 20 OOC) RE@ITAL 1 5 0 0 C I-Ns'jRA.NCE - GENE.-@A7- 2,400 F@IDS F@-IFE 2,500 PE@?,T'rC 300 1,000 3,500 5,000 ",P T -V 12,000 500 S7-E 3,000 S C @TVE N I R S 1,500 E 7 T ')OC --Fz.-c;z DT@-c=CEmL 3 000 TT-TT 7-r'r7S 1 'OOC WR-RK PZR--7E@ - 5 0 0- 116 400 9,100 ATTACHMENT' 27540 YNEZ SUITE J-9 TEMECULA, CA 92591 (909) 676-7875 FAX (909) 676-5921 Marketing & Promotions of the 1995 GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE kNr) PU,%IPKINJ RON PUBLICITY: LONG LEAD -REGIONAL TO NATIONAL Publicity for the GrEat Temecula Tractor Race begins in.May with media kits. being mailed to approximately 60 national and regional magazines. Outdoor and recreational vehicle magazines are stressed since these publications reach a greater percentage of our targeted audience. The partial list includes: Westways, Arizona Highways, American Way - lnflight, Coast to Coast Magazine, Los Angeles Magazine, Mature Traveler, National Motorist (Allstate Magazine), Orange Coast Magazine, Phoenix Home & Garden, San Diego Magazine, San Francisco Focus Southern California Guide, Where Magazine, Sunset Magazine, RV West Magazine, California Toursim Publication, National Motorist, Motorhome, Outdoors Magazine, and Trailer Life. PUBLICITY BLITZ: Beginning in July regional newspapers and magazines are targetted with Tractor Race Entertainment Bulletins and General Information Media Kits for upcoming Entertainment Calendar publication. Mailings are sent to over 100 contacts at least twice during the nextfou. months. Newspaper calendar sections totalling over 100 are mailed in August, and September. Newspapers from Ventura County to the San Diego/Mexico Border, and all Desert Newspapers are included in the blitz. TELEVISION CAMPAIGN: Souvenir sweatshirts,, t-shirt5, mugs and hats are mailed to all television stations with local news casts.. These stations include KABC -7 L.A., KNBC - L.A., KCBS - 2 L.A., KTLA -5 L.A., KCAL - 9 L.A., KTTV-FOX - 1 1 L.A. KGTV-ABC San Diego, KFMB - CBS San Diego, KNSD - NBC San Diego, and KETV -Fox San Diego. Packets are mailed both to weather reporters and sportscasters. ADVERTISING CONSULTATIONS PUBLIC RELATIONS MEDIA PLANNING - WRITING ATTAC@NT Television Stations Coverina the 1995 Event: a 0. C. N NASHVILLE NETWORK i(TU, CBS/KNX L.A. KTTV - FOX NBC - San Diego KING CABLE - 30 spots through weekend Entertainment Calendar October 6 a.m. October a.m. October a.m. Lake Elsinore Daily Calendar Announcements KABC - Weekend Calendar inland Valley Cablevision Calendar PSAs Broadcast on the Followin,-. KFAXSan Francisco KFBKSacramento KAHISacramento KK=Ventura Oxnard KNZRBakersfield KCINVictorville KRKCSan Bernardino KPRLSLO KFIVMODESTO K)AXStockton KMGGSanta Rosa KUBAYuba KPCOQuincy KWSDRedding KMGXLA Metro KKLALA Metro KMPCLA Metro KWRPSan Jacinto KORGOrange County KCKCRiverside TICKET GIVEAWAYS WITH 30 SECOND SPOTS KOW -San Diego KSPASan Diego KRTMTemecula KATYHemet/San Jacinto KDESPalm Springs KMETBanning Beaumont KGRBLos Angeles KPSIPalm Springs KKOSSan Diego ATTACHMENT ADVERTISING AND MARKETING: The Great Temecula Tractor Race arranged media sponsorships with radio, newspapers and magazines throughout the Southland. Marketing begins in August with the printing and distribution of over I 0,000 flyers. Print advertising in the Bargain Bulletin, Pennysaver - -3an Diego and Orange County, begins in August, as well 3S the Riverside County/Harte Hank Pennysavers. The Californian and The Press Enterprise advertising beginning in September and continuing until the Tractor Race. The Press Enterprise printed an insert which was distributed to 30,000 subscribers. Posters are distributed by Budweiser 4 weeks prior to the event and are sent to Riverside County Vendors and restaurant bars. Plus posters and flyers are distributed throughout the Temecula Valley. RADIO Radio advertising begins in SEPTEMBER on local stations, KRTM and KATY FM and in Banning/Beaumont KMET. San Diego Country Station KOW promoted the event with ticket giveaways and commercials. Major market stations in Los Angeles, Orange County, Inland Empire and San Diego County are approached in February for ticket and promotional giveaways. PSA'S for the Tractor Races on these stations usually begin two weeks prior to the Event and Ticket Giveaways are conducted during the final week. Budweiser supports the Tractor Race with advertising on KCAL/Kola radio. ATTACHMENT RESULTS: PRINT IMPRESSIONS: As a result of this campaign the 1995 Great Temecula Tractor Race received coverage in the following magazines equaling over 300,000 impressions: Country Party News San Diego Reader Family Focus San Diego Home and Garden inland Empire magazine Copley Newspapers San Diego Union Tribune Anaheim Bulletin Menifee Valley News Sun Tribune Hemet News Times Advocate Menifee News Newspapers coverin- the event - total impressions exceeded 2.6 million. Country Review Los Angeles Reader RV Magazine San Diego Around San Diego Business journal Good Sam Magazine Los Angeles Times inland Dailv Bulletin O.C. Register Rancho News Californian Sun City News Press Enterprise Blade Citizen Chino News Advertising Dollars Spent/or in-kind for the Great Temecula Tractor Race: $ 53,000. Additional advertising in the Bargain Bulletin and Pennysavers equaled a distribution of over 1.5 million copies/readers. OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY . ITEIN4 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 8:16 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT:3 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Undemans ABSENT:2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1 . Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Roberts Minutes.fa ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Roberts, seconded by Board Member Ford to adjourn at 8:17 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Chairperson Birdsall and Board Member Stone absent. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary r:\minutes.fa\032696 -2- OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY . ITEI\4 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 8:17 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT:3 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans ABSENT:2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1 Minutes 1.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996. AYES: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Roberts Minutes.otwa\040996 ADJOURNMENT it was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Roberts to adjourn at 8:17 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Minutes.otwa\040996 -2- ITEIN4 23 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANQE CITY MMAGER T CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council adopt the resolutions described below. 1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 2.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY 3.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS R:INORTONLLAGENDASIFINANCNG.AGN 04116196 BACKGROUND: The California Government Code requires that, prior to the formation by a public agency of any community facilities district that will finance improvements to be owned and operated by another public agency, the public agencies enter into a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement. The Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority"'@ -as undertaken proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities Distric-, !,'o. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'CFD'), and it is proposed that the CFD finance various public improvements to be owned and operated by the City, all as specified in a proposed Joint Community Facilities Agreement for the City and the Authority. The Director of Public Works has reviewed the proposed agreement and the list of improvements to be owned by the City attached thereto. The form of the agreement is on file with the City Clerk, and City Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement and that it be executed and delivered by the City Manager, so that the Authority can proceed with the formation of the CFD. The City and the Redevelopment Agency have entered into a joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the "Improvement Authority'), in order to accommodate a proposed financing structure for public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and for the Western Bypass. The proposed structure for the financing has been simplified, and the Improvement Authority is no longer required to assist in the financing. The Improvement Authority has not, to date, entered into any contracts or issued or incurred any debt. City Staff now recommends that the City Council move to terminate the Improvement Authority, subject to adoption by the Redevelopment Agency of a resolution also terminating the Improvement Authority, in order to avoid the incurrence of any future administrative costs in respect to the Improvement Authority. If it is ever needed in the future, the Improvement Authority can be reestablished by execution of a new joint exercise of powers agreement by the City and the Agency when such a need arises. The City has conducted proceedings to form an assessment district to finance the first phase of the Western Bypass Corridor. It is expected that those improvements will be financed by the CFD, so that the assessment district is no longer necessary. Accordingly, City Staff recommends that the assessment district proceedings be abandoned, contingent upon the issuance of bonds by the Authority for the CFD in an amount sufficient to finance the Western Bypass improvements. Attachments:Resolutions (3) Joint Community Facilities Agreement R., INORTONL IAGENDASIFINANCNG. A GN 04116196 RESOLUTTON NO. 96.- A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY COUNCIEL OF THE Crff OF APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DMWTING TIIE EXECUTTON AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT CO FAC AG WrM THE OILD TOWN/WESTS]IDE CO FAC DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORrff , the Old Town[Westide Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') intends to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public improvements) (the 'District") in order to finance certain public improvements in the Old Town area of the City of Temecula (the 'City') and to finance the first phase of the Western Bypass, and some of the public improvements to be financed will be owned and/or operated, when completed, by the City (the Public Improvements'); and WHEREAS, in order to enable the District to ftmce the Public Improvements, Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with respect to the Public Improvements prior to the formation of the District; and VMEREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement, by and between the City and the Authority (the 'Agreement') has been filed with the City Clerk and the City Council, with the assistance of City Staff , has reviewed the Agreement and the City Council now desires to approve the Agreement and direct its execution and delivery. NOW, THEREFORIE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: 1. Approval of Agreement, The City Council hereby approves the Agreement, in the form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreement in such form together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney and the City Director of Public Works, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the Agreement. The City Council hereby declares that the Agreement will be beneficial to the residents of the City. 2. Official Ac@ The City Manager, Finance Director, Director of Public Works, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the Agreement or the formation of the District, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates, documents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. RESOSIOO PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATMT: June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF I]DE) SS CrrY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTTFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at regulu meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES:COUNC]ILMENMERS: NOES:COUNCEL ERS: ABSENT:COUNCEL ERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC @os 100 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY VMEREAS, the City of Temecula (the 'City') and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the 'Agency') are parties to the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the 'Agreement') creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the 'Authority'); and VMEREAS, the Authority has never entered into any contracts or issued any Bonds (as defined in the Agreement) and the City Council now desires to terminate the Agreement and the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: 1. Termination of Agreement and Auth@ The Agreement and the Authority are terminated, subject to adoption by the Agency of a resolution also terminating the Agreement and the Authority. 2. Official Actions, The Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the termination of the Agreement and the Authority, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates or instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC Rftw 101 STATE OF CALI]FORNIA) COUNTY OF IDE) SS CrrY OF ULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the city of Temecula, Y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll caU vote: AYES: COUNC]IL ERS: NOES: COUNCIIL ERS: ABSENT: COUNC]IL ERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk, cmC Resos 101 RESOLLTTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY OF TEMIECULA Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District No. 95-1 RESOLVED, by the City Council (the 'Council') of the City of Temecula (the 'City'), County of Riverside (the 'County'), State of California, that: 1. Resolution of Intention.- This Council has undertaken special assessment proceedings (the 'Proceedings') pursuant to its Resolution No. 95-103, 'A Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements' (the 'Resolution of Intention') adopted by the Council under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of California (the 'Act') on December 12, 1995, in and for the City's Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District No. 95-1 (the 'Assessment District'). 2. Boundary @ In the Proceedings, this Council has heretofore caused a Map of Proposed Boundaries of the Assessment District to be filed of record in the office of the Recorder of the County on December 14, 1995, at the hour of 8:00 o'clock a.m. in Book 40 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page 83 (the 'Boundary Map'). 3. Abandonment of Proceedings, This Council has now determined to abandon the Proceedings for the Assessment District, contingent upon the issuance of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facility District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvement) 1996 Special Tax Bonds (the 'CFD Bonds') and hereby orders that from and after the date of issuance of the CFD Bonds the Proceedings be finally and completely abandoned. No further action shall be taken with respect to the Proceedings by the Council, following the issuance of the CFD Bonds including, but not limited to, the imposition and collection of any special assessments in the Assessment District. 4. Recording Ordered, Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, following the date of issuance of CFD Bonds, to cause to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County in which all of the Assessment District is located, a certified copy of this resolution of abandonment. The certificate of the City Clerk attached to such copy shall include a reference to the date of the adoption of this resolution of abandonment, the date of the Resolution of Intention and date and recording data of the Boundary Map, all as herein provided. @e Recorder shall index the resolution of abandonment in the book containing the index of the Rcsos/102 Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts. 5. Effective D= This resolution of abandonment shall take effect upon the date of its adoption by this Council. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A@T: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resoa/ 1 02 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSI]DE) ss CITY OF TEMIECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 96- - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE FOR RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the undersigned City Clerk of the above City hereby certifies that the foregoing is a full and correct copy of the Resolution of Abandonment of Special Assessment Proceedings adopted by the Council of the City on April 23, 1996 in the Proceedings for the Assessment District for which the Boundary Map was recorded, all as specified in the within Resolution of Abandonment of Special Assessment Proceedings and to which reference is hereby made for all particulars. June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Resos/102 3 ITEI\4 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINAN"-, CITY MANAGER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:Agency Members FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor - Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority RECOMMENDATION:That the Redevelopment Agency adopt the following resolution. 1 .Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY BACKGROUND: The City and the Redevelopment Agency have entered into a joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the "Improvement Authority"), in order to accommodate a proposed financing structure for public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and for the Western Bypass Corridor. The proposed structure for the financing has been simplified, and the Improvement Authority is no longer required to assist in financing. The Improvement Authority has not, to date, entered into any contracts or issued or incurred any debt. Agency Staff now recommends that the Agency move to terminate the Improvement Authority, subject to adoption by the City Council of a resolution also terminating the Improvement Authority, in order to avoid the incurrence of any future administrative costs in respect to the Improvement Authority. If it is ever needed in the future, the Improvement Authority can be reestablished by execution of a new joint exercise of powers agreement by the City and the Agency when such a need arises. Attachments:Resolution Joint Community Facilities Agreement R:INORTONLIAGENDASIFINRDA.AGN 04116196 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") are parties to the Old TownAVestside Improvement Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the "Agreement") creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, the Authority has never entered into any contracts or issued any Bonds (as defined in the Agreement) and the Governing Board of the Agency now desires to terminate the Agreement and the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows: 1. Termination of Aizreement and Auth@ The Agreement and the Authority are terminated, subject to adoption by the City Council of the City of a resolution also terminating the Agreement and the Authority. 2. Official Actions, The Chairperson, Executive Director, Secretary and all other officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the termination of the Agreement and the Authority, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates or instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC/Agency Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIEFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: AGENCYMEMBERS: NOES: AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSENT:AGENCYMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC/Agency Secretary RESOS. Rda 1 1 30043-01 JHHW:Pjr:cra 03/24/96 12128 JOINT COMMUNIT-Y FACILMES AGREEMENT OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILMES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CO FACIUTIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLDTOWNAREAPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS) This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of April 9,1996, is by and between the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") and the City of Temecula (the "Participating Agency"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority has undertaken proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "CFD"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code, and to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") under the Act in order to finance various public improvements necessitated by the development of the Old Town Area of the City of Temecula and otherwise to finance improvement to the Western Bypass in the City (collectively, the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project includes the construction of the public improvements described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Exhibit is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire that the Participating Agency own and operate the Improvements upon their completion if they comply with the standards and are completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which Improvements are to be financed, in part, with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds and the Improvements, all as more particularly set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. The Authority will reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an amount necessary to finance the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and construction of the Improvements. Said amount, together with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in the Improvement Fund established for the CFD (the "Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amount shall in no way be pledged as security for the Bonds. The amount necessary for the acquisition and construction of the Improvements is currently estimated to be in excess of $15,000,000. Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Section 2. Construction of Improvements. The Authority shall cause the Improvements to be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency. All construction shall be done by independent contractors, and neither the Participating Agency nor the Authority shall have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in connection therewith; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities other than the Authority in respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements. Section 3. Inspection and Acceptance; Use of Bond Funds. The Participating Agency shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion of such construction to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and responsibility of operation, of the Improvements. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any of the Improvements. Following the acceptance by the Participating Agency of the Improvements, the Authority shall disburse the proceeds of the Bonds described in Section 1 above to pay or reimburse payment of the costs thereof. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Authority may disburse such amounts to pay costs of construction of the Improvements prior to completion of all of the Improvements, if it determines that such disbursement is permissible under the Act and will reduce the overall costs of construction of the Improvements. Section 4. Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund and identified in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable hereunder. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder shall be to inspect and accept the Improvements as described in Section 3 above. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to their acceptance by the Participating Agency. If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the conunencement of an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations. Section 5. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the Bonds are not issued by December 31, 1996. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements-by the Participating Agency, and disbursement from the Improvement Fund of the amount described in Section I above by the Authority to pay or reimburse a portion of the total costs of the Improvements. 2 Section 6. No Obligation to Form CFD; Agreement of Benefit to Residents. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, by their respective approvals of this Agreement, the Authority and the Participating Agency have each declared and hereby confirm that this Agreement is beneficial to the residents of their respective. entities in assuring the provision of financing for a portion of the costs of the Improvements in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Section 7. Partial Invali@t . If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein. Section 9. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature below. CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Participating Agency") Date of Execution: April _, 1996 By: City Manager Attest: City Clerk OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY (the "Authority") Date of Execution: April . 1996 By: Executive Director Attest: Secretary ,40043-0 l:j2 128 3 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEN4ENTS The public improvements described herein shall include the land acquisition, design and construction of the facilities and shall include all associated and incidental facilities which may or may not be specifically identified in the description unless specifically noted otherwise. OLD TOWN STREET IMEPROVEMIENTS - FIRST ST. ROAD AND BRIDGE Facilities for Street Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula: Provide a 78 foot wide street right-of-way, 58 feet of roadway pavement in First Street from the Western Bypass Corridor to Front Street including a bridge over Murrietta Creek and traffic signalization at the intersection of Front Street. Provide new intersection configuration at Front St., First St. and Santiago Rd. Preliminary and final design of facilities shall be by the City of Temecula and the design shall be provided to the Community Facilities District ('CFD') without additional charge. 'Me design and construction of the utilities as may be required by various utility companies to provide the required services to the proposed Westside development are addressed elsewhere in this Exhibit. City of Temecula shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for all the permits including the City of Temecula, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Department of Fish and Wild Life, Riverside County Flood Control and any other permits and approvals as may be required, and the CFD shall reimburse the City for the costs of all permits and environmental studies. City of Temecula shall acquire afl necessary right of way and shall relocate as required businesses, tenants and property owners. The CFD shah reimburse the City for actual costs of the land and relocations, including the costs of third party contracts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation. 2. OLD TOWN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING PROJECT Facilities for Gateway Landscaping Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula: Provide design and construction of the Old Town Gateway Landscaping improvements as approved by the City. Design shall include trees and other landscaping along the Westside of Front St. between Front St. and (Murrie= Creek) and Rancho California Rd. to the Post Office. Street tree placement shall be in conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan. 'ne City shall acquire the necessary right of way and the CFD shall reimburse the City for the actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party contracts. -for consultants for land acquisition and relocation. Submit the Landscape Plan to the Planning Department for review and approval. A-i Construct and install the landscaping in accordance with the Landscape Plan and scope of work as approved. 7le scope of work shall be the design and design administration of improvements and construction and construction administration of the approved design. The approved design shall be such that the entire cost of design, construction, administration and all other associated project costs, as approved the City, do not exceed $83,500. There shall be no obligation to perform any of the scope herein which would result in charges in excess thereof, absent mutual agreement of the parties to increase said allowance. 3. OLD TOWN DEMONSTRATION BLOCK ETSCAIPE) Facilities for Streetscape and Landscaping Improvements, including the Front St. Repairs and Upgrades, Front St. Reconstruction and Miscellaneous Street Improvements, as approved by the City of Temecula: Provide design and construction of improvements to existing Old Town public areas, particularly the area of the intersection of Front St. and Main St. Improvements shall include paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, lighting, street furniture and other upgrades as approved by the City. Scope of work shall be the design, design administration, construction and construction administration of improvements to an area as designated by the City. The Design scope approved for construction shall be such that the entire cost of design, construction and administration, construction management and all other associated project costs, as approved by the City, do not exceed $698,000. There shall be no obligation to perform any portion of the scope herein which would result in charges in excess thereof, absent mutual agreement of the parties to increase said allowance. Provide a conceptual design and submit to Planning Department for review and approval for the following: i.Landscaping and Lighting. ii.Public signage, including Gateway entry sian, directional signs and street name pole signs iii.Street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk (boardwalk), paving, street lighting with sound system, street furniture to include wood benches, phone booths, trash receptacles, newspaper racks, mailboxes, bus shelters and drinking fountains, all in general conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan and Circulation Element of the General Plan. Prepare the necessary plans, specifications and a detailed cost estimate for the approved scope of work and submit for review by the City. Construct the facilities as per approved plans and scope of work. Design shall be provided to facilitate the final design and to eliminate potential future drainage problems. A-2 4. OIJ) TOWN STORM DRAIN IM[PROVEMENTS Facilities for Storm Drain Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula and Riverside County Flood Control District, if required: Design and r-onstruc t a Storm Drain System in Third Street with adequate capacity to drain a portion of residential development east of Interstate 15 (one pick-up point), a portion of the Interstate 15 slope and tributary areas at Mercedes Street and Front Street. Design and construct a Storm Drain System in Sixth Street with adequate capacity to drain a portion of residential development east of Interstate 15 (two pick-up points, one in Fourth St. and the other in Sixth St.), a portion of the Interstate 15 slope and tributary areas at Mercedes Street and Front Street. Both storm drain systems will outlet into Murrietta Creek. Provide the necessary facilities alone, the systems to accept local drainage. Obtain all necessary permits for the installation of the improvements. Construct the improvements in accordance with the approvals of the City of Temecula and Riverside County Flood Control District ("RCFCD'), if required. The City of Temecula shall obtain any right of way necessary to construct the improvements and the CFD shall reimburse the City for actual land costs, including the costs of third party contracts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation. Reference attached Exhibit 1 dated March 5, 1996. 5 OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS - WESTERN BYPASS Facilities for Street Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula: Western Bypass Corridor - Provide an 88 foot wide street right-of-way, 33 feet of roadway pavement on each side of a 12 foot median, from SR79/1-15 northerly to Vincent Moraga Drive including a bridge over Murrietta Creek and traffic signalization at the intersection of Front Street. Extend Front St. approximately 100 feet to the new intersection with the Western Bypass. City of Temecula shall design facilities and shall be reimbursed for the cost of the design for the portion constructed by the CFD. City of Temecula shall acquire all necessary right of way and the CFD shall reimburse the City for actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party contracts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation. A-3 Vincent MoraLya Drivt - Provide a 78 foot wide street right-of-way, 58 feet of roadway pavement from the Western Bypass Corridor easterly past Ridge Park Drive, joinine, existing Vincent Moraga Drive. Provide a "Tee' intersection with Ridge Park. Also provide traffic signalization at the intersection of Vincent Moraga Drive and Rancho California Road. City of Temecula shall design facilities and shall be reimbursed for the cost of the design for the portion constructed by the CFD. City of Temecula shall acquire all necessary right of way and the CFD shall reimburse the City for actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party contra:Ts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation. 6 WESTERN BYPASS NORTH OF VINCENT MORAGA Facilities for the following shall be as approved by the City of Temecula. In the event the City is able to amend the EIR to permit the timely bidding and construction of the Western Bypass north of Vincent Moraca, the following shall be provided: Project shall cut and fill the roadbed for the Western Bypass between Vincent Moraga and Rancho California Rd. using excess material from the construction of the Western Bypass south of Vincent Moraga, First St. and the hotel/arena site. 'Me costs of this effort shall be bome by the CFD as a part of the guaranteed construction effort. The design of the roadbed shall be by the City and the project shall not be required to reimburse the City for this portion of the design. The project shall reimburse the City for costs to acquire right of way for the Northern section regardless of whether or not the EIR is amended. 7le project shall provide drainage facilities, landscaping, erosion control and all other requirements to provide the cut and fill for the Northern section. 'ne City of Temecula shall reimburse the project, as costs are incurred, for the actual costs of these requirements, including but not limited to all administration, management, inspection, testing, overhead and reasonable fees as defined in the Construction Agreement. The City shall accept all responsibility for maintenance of the improvements upon completion of the work. In the event the City is unable to amend the EIR, the project shall either permanently build up the residential area south of First St. and east of the Western Bypass or shall stockpile the material on a vacant parcel north.of Vincent Moraga. The City shall take all responsibility to maintain 'm its natural condition the stockpiled material until used to fill the Northern half of the Western Bypass. In the event construction of the Northern half of the Western Bypass does not commence within 5 years of the completion of the portion south of Vincent Moraga the City shall cause the stockpiled material to be removed in order to return the site to the original condition. A-4 7. OTHER PROJECTS SHOULD ADDMONAL FUNDS BE AVAILABLE Facilities for the following shall be approved by the City of Temecula or appropriate entity: Main St. pedestrian.link from the Old Town project to the Westside Hotel/Arena site. Dr)- utilities such as electrical (both primary service routing existing underground), -as, telephone and cable (both new and routing underground). A-5 7 cfa )OROPOSED 240 STORM IDR PROP!! 2le STORM DRAIN PRO DP.AIN 3V E:XLST. 24 PROPOSED 360 STORM D@ EXMT. VORM DRAIN b iLoLcc.%.i $TUO-1 k L%l ri $Lt c, w 94 A lkta STORM DRAIN EXHIBIT Volvo A-6 ITEI\4 25 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANOE CITY MANAGER OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Authority Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: hold the election called pursuant to the resolution listed as 5. below, declare the results of the election, and have the first reading of the ordinance described below. 1 .Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF BUSINESS AND RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS 2.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) That the Board of Directors adopt the resolutions described below, R.,INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN CL4116196 3.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF THE OLD TOWN/ WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 4.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 5.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION 6.Hold a special election of the landowners in the proposed Community Facilities District No. 1. 7.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN R.,INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN 04116196 8.Have the first reading of an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) BACKGROUND: The Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the financing of public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and the Western Bypass Corridor. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt a resolution as to certain housekeeping matters relative to the Authority, including the setting of a date for an annual meeting place, the rules of proceedings for meetings, etc. The original financing structure proposed for the Old Town area public improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor contemplated the use of two separate community facilities districts. The financing structure has been simplified, and the facilities to be financed by the proposed CFD No. 2 has been included within the authorized facilities for CFD No. 1, so that CFD No. 2 is no longer necessary. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the proceedings for CFD No. 2 be abandoned. On March 26, 1 996, the Authority held concurrent public hearings on the establishment of CFD No. 1, the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 1 and the issuance of bonds for CFD No. 1, as required by the California Government Code. The proponent of CFD No. 1, T.Z.B.G., Inc., has requested that the Authority now take the actions necessary to officially form CFD No. 1, to authorize the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 1 and to authorize the incurrence of bonded indebtedness by CFD No. 1. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt resolutions of formation and of necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, and calling a special election of the landowners in the area of CFD No. 1. Ballots for the election have already been mailed to the eligible landowner voters, and have been returned to the City Clerk. The eligible voters include all landowners within the boundaries of the CFD No. 1, as such boundaries are indicated on a third amended boundary map for CFD No. 1 on file with the Authority Secretary. At the request of T.Z.B.G., Inc., a significant amount of land previously proposed to be included in CFD No. 1, as indicated on the second amended boundary map for CFD No. 1, has been dropped from CFD No. 1, and will not be subject to the levy of special taxes. If the eligible landowner voters approve the ballot measure by more than two-thirds of the votes cast, the Authority will be able to levy special taxes solely on land located in CFD No. 1 and then only if such land has been conveyed to T.Z.B.G., Inc. Or BFD/OTEP durin ' g the one-year period following April 23, 1996. By law, the landowners are given one vote for each acre of land or portion thereof that they own within the boundaries of CFD No. 1. The City Clerk, as Secretary of the Authority, will be requested to canvass the election immediately after adoption of the resolution calling the election. R.'INORTONL IFINCFD.A GN 04116196 if two-thirds or more of the votes cast are in favor of CFD No. 1, the Authority is then requested to adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election and providing for the recording of a notice of special tax lien with the County Recorder. The notice provides all future property owners with knowledge of the existence of the Authority's special taxing powers. The Authority is then requested to have the first reading of an ordinance levying special taxes. The ordinance permits special taxes to be levied only on property located in CFD No. 1, and then only after title to the property has been conveyed to T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP. It is expected that special taxes will be levied to pay debt service on bonds proposed to be issued for CFD No. 1. Staff expects that a resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds and approving the related legal documents will be presented to the Authority for approval sometime next month. Attachments:Resolutions (6) Ordinance Notice of Special Tax Lien R:INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN 04116196 RESOLUTTON NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTTON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE CO FACIELMEES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, D@TING THE G OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISBIING THE ORDER OF BUS@S AND RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the 'City') and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the 'Agency') have adopted resolutions authorizing the formation of a joint powers authority under Articles 1-4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to be known as the 'Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority' (the 'Authority'), and the execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement in connection therewith; and AS, the City and the Agency have executed said agreement and the Authority, being duly formed, now desires to take certain actions relative to its administration as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. Regular Meetings. The regular meetings of the Board of Directors of the Authority shall hereafter be held annually on the first Tuesday of July at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. If any regular meeting falls on a holiday, such regular meeting shall be held on the next Tuesday which is a business day at the same hour. Section 2. Sp=ial MeetinLs. The Chairperson of the Authority may, when it is deemed expedient, and shall, upon the written request of two (2) Boardmembers of the Authority, call a special meeting of the Authority for the purpose of transacting the business designated in the call. At such special meeting, no business shall be considered other than as designated in the call. Section 3. PostinL, ALyendas/Notices. The Secretary or her authorized representative shall post an agenda for each regular Authority meeting or a notice for each special Authority meeting containing a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting together with the time and location of the meeting. Agendas/notices shall be posted in the same place or places as agendas are posted for meetings of the City Council of the City at least 72 hours in advance of each regular meeting and at least 24 hours in advance of each special meeting. The Secretary shall maintain a record of such posting. Resos.FA\004 Section 4. MeetinL, Place. All meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at the regular meeting place of the City Council of the City, unless the Board of Directors shall adjourn to or fix another place of meeting in a notice to be given thereof, or unless prevented by flood, fire or other disaster. Said regular meeting place is hereby fixed and established at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Section 5. Rules of Proceedings. (a) Public Meetings: All legislative sessions of the Board of Directors, whether regular or special, shall be open to the public. At every regular meeting, members of the public shall have an opportunity to address the Authority on matters within the Authority's subject matterjurisdiction. Public input and comment on matters on the agenda shall be heard when the matter regularly comes up on the agenda. Public input and comment on matters not otherwise on the agenda shall be made during the 'open time for public urgency matters.' The Chairperson or presiding officer may limit the total amount of time allocated for public discussion by particular issues and/or the time allocated for each individual speaker. (b) Quorum: Three (3) of the members of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. (c) Method of Action: The Board of Directors shall act only by ordinance, resolution or motion, which, to become effective, shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the members of the Board of Directors present and voting. (d) Manner of Voting. Voting on formal resolutions, matters as to any federal, state, county or city agency, and on such other matters as may be requested by a majority of the Boardmembers, shall be by roll call or call vote, and the ayes, noes and members present not voting shall be entered upon the minutes of such meeting, except on the election of officers, which may be by ballot. (e) Adjournment: The Board of Directors may adjourn any regular, adjourned regular, special or adjourned special meeting to a time and place specified in the order of adjournment. Less than a quorum may so adjourn from time to time. If all members are absent from any regular or adjourned regular meeting the Secretary may declare the meeting adjourned to a stated time and place and shall cause a written notice of the adjournment to be given in the same manner as provided for special meetings, unless such notice is waived as provided for special meetings. A copy of the order or notice of adjournment shall be conspicuously posted on or near the door of the place where the regular, adjourned regular, special or adjourned special meeting was held within 24 hours after the time of the adjournment. When a regular or adjourned regular meeting is adjourned as herein provided, the resulting adjourned regular meeting is a regular meeting for all purposes. When an order of adjournment of any meeting fails to state the hour at which the adjourned meeting is to be held, it shall be held at the hour specified for regular meetings. Resoo.FA\004 2 (f) Hearings - Continuance: Any hearing being held, or notice or ordered to be held, by the Board of Directors at any meeting may by order or notice of continuance be continued or re-continued to any subsequent meeting of the Board of Directors in the same manner and to the same extent set forth for the adjournment of meetings; provided, that if the hearing is continued to a time less than 24 hours after the time specified in the order of notice of hearing, a copy of the order or notice of continuance of hearing shall be posted immediately following the meeting at which the order of declaration of continuance was adopted or made. Section 6. Contracts o Agreements. All contracts or agreements on behalf of the Authority shall be signed by the Chairperson or the Executive Director, and countersigned by the Secretary, after having been authorized to do so by action of the Board of Directors, unless otherwise specifically provided by resolution of the Board of Directors. Any contract or agreement involving less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) may be executed by any of such officers without the need for any approval by the Board of Directors. Section 7. @. The Authority shall have an Official Seal consisting of two (2) concentric circles with the words 'Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority' within the outer circle and 'September 12, 1995', the date of formation of the Authority, within the inner circle. The Secretary shall obtain the Seal at the Authority's expense and shall have custody of the Seal. Section 8. Secretary of Statc. Bond Counsel to the Authority is hereby directed to file a notice of the formation of the Authority with the Secretary of State of the State of California, as required by Sections 6503.5 and 53051 of the California Government Code. Section 9. Office and Mailing AddL=. The office of the Authority and its official mailing address are hereby fixed and established at Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority c/o City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, Attention: Executive Director. Resot.FA\004 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk Authority Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT:BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary 4 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY FACH, DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHOP-,ITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE CO TY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC P"ROVEMIENTS) VMEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions of intention to establish the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) ('CFD 2") and to incur bonded indebtedness of the proposed CFD 2; and @EREAS, on September 20, 1995, a map of the boundaries of the proposed CFD 2 was recorded in Book 40 at Page I of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, and on October 23, 1995, a first amended map of the boundaries of the proposed CFD 2 was recorded in Book 40 at Page 62 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside; and VMER]EAS, this Board of Directors now desires to abandon the proceedings to form CFD 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1.The proceedings to form CFD 2 are hereby abandoned. 2.The Secretary is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, including the Certificate of the Secretary attached hereto as Exhibit A. Resos.FA/02 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC Secretary/City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk Resos.FA/02 2 EXHIBIT A Recording Requested by and When Recorded Retum to: Secretary okj Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority c/o City Clerk City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA. 92590 CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSI]DE COMMUNITY FAC]IL DISTRICT NNANCING AUTHORITY The undersigned Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority hereby certifies as follows: 1. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution of abandonment of proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) ('CFD 2"), which was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') on April 23, 1996; and 2. The original resolution of intention to establish CFD 2 was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority on September 12, 1995; and 3. The map of the proposed boundaries of CFD 2 was filed with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside on September 20, 1995, and was recorded by said County Recorder in Book 40 at Page 1 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, and a first amended map of the proposed boundaries of CFD 2 was filed with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside on October 23, 1995, and was recorded by said County Recorder in Book 40 at Page 62 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts; and 4. Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the County Recorder of the County of Riverside shall index the attached Resolution of Abandonment in the book containing the index of the maps of assessment and community facilities districts. Resoa.FA/02 3 Dated: April 1996 By: Secretary, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA On before me, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. S my hand and official seal. Resos.FA/02 4 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT F3NAN( AUTUORffY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COFAC DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COTY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLID TOWN AREA PUBLIC U%lPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WRMIN THE DISTRICT, PREL@ARI]LY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LEMT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBAUTTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LINUT TO THE QUALMM ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'); and VMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution making findings as to the complexity of the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolution, as adopted by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Amending Resolution'); and %MEREAS, the Resolution of Intention, the resolution adopted on October 10, 1995 described above and the Amending Resolution, incorporating maps of the proposed boundaries of the District and stating the facilities to be financed, the cost of providing such facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with respect to District, are on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are., incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set fo@ herein; and Resos.FA/03 MMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act, the Resolution of Intention and the Amending Resolution, as applicable, relative to the proposed formation of the District; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the facilities to be provided therein and the levy said special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and VMEREAS, at said hearing evidence was presented to this Board of Directors on said matters before it, including a report (the 'Report') as to facilities to be provided through the District and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of Directors at the conclusion of said hearing was fully advised with respect to the premises; and "EREAS, this Board of Directors desires to delete certain territory from the proposed boundaries of the District, and to approve the revised boundaries of the District as said boundaries are indicated on the third amended map of the boundaries of the District on file with the Secretary and approved as set forth below; and VMEREAS, written protests with respect to the formation of the District, the furnishing of specified types of facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes have not been filed with the Secretary by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and WHEREAS, the special tax proposed to be levied in the District to pay for the proposed facilities to be provided thereby, has been revised following the public hearing to lower the maximum special taxes that may be levied in the District and now is as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, and said special tax has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and RMEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to form the District and call for an election thereon as provided by the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2.The proposed special tax to be levied within the District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act. Resoa.FA/03 2 3. AU prior proceedings taken by this Board of Directors in connection with the establishment of the District and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act. On September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution adopting Local Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts of the Authority, and this Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that formation of the District and the authorization to levy special taxes and the proposed rates and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District are in conformity with said goals and policies. The Joint Community Facilities Agreements between the Authority and the City of Temecula, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Eastern Municipal Water District and the Rancho California Water District, as authorized by Section 4 of the Resolution of Intention, and heretofore executed by the Executive Director and by the Secretary of the Authority, are hereby ratified and confirmed. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to negotiate (if applicable), with the assistance of Authority Counsel, Bond Counsel and the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula, and to execute and deliver, all certificates, documents and agreements referenced in or otherwise necessary to carry out the obligations of the Authority under said agreements. 4. The community facilities district designated 'Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements)' is hereby established pursuant to the Act. 5. The boundaries of the District, as set forth in the third amended map of the District on file with the Secretary, are hereby approved, are incorporated herein by reference and shall be the boundaries of the District. The Secretary is hereby directed to record, or cause to be recorded, said third amended map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside as soon as practicable, but in any event no more than fifteen days after the adoption of this Resolution. 6. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A attached to the Resolution of Intention and those facilities described in Section 3 of the Amending Resolution (collectively, the 'Facilities'), which Exhibit and description are by this reference incorporated herein. 7. Except where funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities, the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to finance the Facilities and/or the costs of the Authority, the District and the City of Temecula to administer the District and such bonds, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property and/or interests therein in the District, will be annually levied within the District, and collected in the same mann - er as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors may Resoit.FA/03 3 direct, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property and the interests therein within the District, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the District to estimate the probable maximum amount such owner will have to pay, is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. As permitted by Section 53340 of the Act, the Board of Directors of the Authority hereby authorizes: (a) the special tax to be collected by direct billing of the property owners when required or otherwise determined by the Treasurer of the Authority as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District, (b) any property subject to delinquent special taxes to be sold at foreclosure sale at a price determined, consistent with any requirements of the Act, as provided in the fiscal agent agreement providing for the terms of any bonds issued for the District, and (c) a representative of the owners of such bonds to bid at any such foreclosure sale in the amount of the delinquent special taxes plus any penalties, interest and applicable foreclosure costs; and to take title to the delinquent property of the highest bidder, without any requirement for the payment of monies by such representative or the Bondowners; all as further provided and directed in the fiscal agent agreement providing for the terms of any bonds issued for the District the payment of which is to be made from the proceeds of such special taxes. 8. It is hereby found and determined that the Facilities are necessary to .-. @---.t increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development or rehabilitation occurring in the District. 9. The Treasurer of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6444, is the officer of the Authority which will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act. 10. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the Board of Directors of the Authority ceases. 1 1. In accordance with Section 53325.7 of the Act, the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the District is hereby preliminarily established at $27,500,000 and said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the voters of the District as hereafter provided. The proposition establishing said annual appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors voting thereon and shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the applicable provisions of Resoa.FA/03 4 Section 53325.7 of the Act. 12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election, the time, place and conditions of which shall be as specified by a separate resolution of the Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO , by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson A=T: June S. Greek, CMC Secretary, City Clerk Resoa.FA/03 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary, City Clerk Resot.FA/03 6 EXHI]BIT A RATE AND MIETHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY FACIIL DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORrff Commu nity Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District'), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Responsible Party of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') through the application of the following procedures. AU of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied win be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAX SPECIAL TAX ZONE A The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 on any Parcel, designated as Zone A on the map shown herein as Exhibit 1, shall not exceed the sum of: (i)The maximum building special tax rate of $17.00 per building square foot, multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; plus (ii)The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied times the Land Area of the Parcel. Resoa.FA/03 7 ZONE B The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 on any Parcel, designated as Zone B on the map shown herein as Exhibit I, shall not exceed the sum of- (i)The maximum building special tax rate of $17.00 per building square foot, multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; plus (ii)The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied times the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax for Zone A and Zone B shall be levied annually. The maximum building special tax and the maximum land special tax for Zone A and Zone B shall increase each Fiscal Year from the maximum special tax for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 by 2%, compounded annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government Code. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGOREES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special taxes on the County's secured tax roll, the Responsible Party shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such parcel is Taxable Property, and whether such Parcel is designated as Zone A or Zone B. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1. LEVY The Responsible Party shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the FiscalYear commending such July 1, and levy on each Parcel which is Taxable Property, as follows: Step 1:Determine the Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the District. Step 2:Calculate the annual building tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 85 % of Resos.FA/03 8 the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3:Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of-. (i) the annual building tax rate; or (ii)the maximum building special tax rate for Zone A and Zone B, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4:Determine the Land Area for each Parcel of Taxable Property in the District and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the District. Step 5:Calculate the annual land tax rate as the lessor of- (i)(the sum of the Special Tax Liability less the total of the funds generated for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property under Step 3 above), divided by the total Land Area (by square footage) for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property; or (ii)the maximum land special tax for Zone A and Zone B, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 6:Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property by the annual land tax rate determined under Step 5. Step 7:Calculate the sum of the building tax (from Step 3) and the land tax (from Step 6)for each parcel which is Taxable Property. PRIEPA S Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Responsible Party in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel: A.The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Respo sible Party, as follows: Resoz.FA/03 9 1.Compute the special tax for such Parcel by the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. 2.The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all properties for the then current Fiscal year within the District, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special tax for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). 3.The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Responsible Party to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Responsible Party to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. 4.Determination of the total amount needed by the Responsible Party shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. B.The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFIMTIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority and the City in carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of their respective counsel, any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and the City staff directly related thereto, and a proportionate -mount of Authority and the City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority or the City, respectively, from its own funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Resos.FA/03 IC Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Authority means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. Building Floor Area means the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of multiple story buildings, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Responsible Party by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Responsible Party shall determine. City means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. District means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements). F'iscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. F-Lscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time. FLscal Year means the period starting on July I and ending on the following June 30. Und Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of Bonds. Resoa.FA/03 Responsible Par-ty is any person or persons who the Authority may appoint from time to time to compute the levy of the special taxes within the District. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Responsible party, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Proper-ty shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District that is owned in fee by T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP, a California corporation, at any time between the adoption of the resolution of formation for the District and the date that is one year after the adoption of the resolution of formation, provided however, that the following property shall be exempt from the special tax (i) any real property that is exempt from taxation by law, (ii) any acres of land owned, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to and accepted by a public agency, including but not limited to, the federal government, the State of California and any local governmental agency, and (iii) land which is a public right-of-way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement. Zone A is designated as those Parcels within the boundaries of the District that are not in Zone B, as shown on the map designated Exhibit 1 herein. Zone B is designated as those Parcels within the boundaries of the District, as shown on the map designated Exhibit 1 herein. Resoa.FA/03 12 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSH)E COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DET G THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC @ROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFI]ED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT VMEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the OldTown/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act if 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention') stating its intention to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District'), pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'); and RUEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness') stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the District for the purpose of financing certain costs of the facilities specified in the Resolution of Intention; and VMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness to add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution making findings as to the complexity of the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness to add additional territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolution, as adopted by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Amending Resolution"); and VMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public Resos.FA/01 hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District, the financing of facilities by the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and interest on the proposed indebtedness and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the District related to the administration of the District; and VMEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the provision of said facilities (the 'Facilities') and the levy of the special tax on property within the District were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and VMEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements), Authorizing The Levy Of A Special Tax Within The District, Preliminarily Establishing An Appropriations Limit For The District And Submitting Levy Of The Special Tax And The Establishment of The Appropriations Limit To The Qualified Electors Of The District' (the 'Resolution of Formation'); and VMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness, as amended by the Amending Resolution; and VMEREAS, no written protests by land owners within or eligible voters of the District with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness, as amended by the Amending Resolution, have been filed with the Secretary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2.This Board of Directors deems it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000 within the boundaries of the District. 3. The indebtedness is to be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, as provided in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending Resolution, and the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling bonds to finance the Facilities and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the District related to the administration of the District. Resos.FA/01 2 4. The whole of the District shall pay for the bonded indebtedness through the levy of the special tax. The tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the formula set forth in Exhibit 'A' to the Resolution of Formation. 5. The maximum amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred is $27,500,000 and the maximum term of the bonds to be issued shall in no event exceed forty (40) years. 6. The bonds shall bear interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable semiannually or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by this Board of Directors or its designee at the time or times of sale of said bonds. 7. The proposition of incurring the bonded indebtedness herein authorized shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District and shall be consolidated with elections on the proposition of levying special taxes within the District and the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District pursuant to Section 53353.5 of the Act. The time, place and conditions of said election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATREST: June S. Greek, CMC Secretary/City Clerk Resoo.FA/01 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED- BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk Resoa.FA/01 4 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION AS, on this date, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority") adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establiihment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District' (the "Resolution of Formation"), ordering the formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District'), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the District and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District; WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District" (the "Resolution to Incur Indebtedness'), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000 upon the security of said special tax to be levied within the District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of said resolutions, the propositions of the levy of said special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District as required by the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act'). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1 . Pursuant to Sections 53326, 53351 and 53325.7 of the Act, the issues of the levy of said special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election called therefor as provided below. R:INORTOAEL4GEAVASU?ESOSISPECEF-ECRES 04112196 2. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the three propositions described in paragraph I above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein. Said form of ballot is hereby approved. 3. This Board of Directors hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory of the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Board of Directors for the purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Board of Directors finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners, within the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners or their authorized representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the District as of the close of said public hearings. 4. This Board of Directors hereby calls a special election to consider the measures described in paragraph 2 above, which election shall be held in the meeting room of this Board of Directors immediately following adoption of this Resolution. The Secretary of the Authority is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the Secretary has on file the Resolution of Formation, a certified third amended boundary map of the proposed boundaries of the District, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to determine the boundaries of the District. The voted ballots shall be returned to the Secretary prior to or immediately following the adoption of this Resolution; and when all of the qualified voters have voted the election shall be closed. 5. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail or hand-delivered ballot pursuant to Section 4000 of the California Elections Code. This Board of Directors hereby finds that paragraph (a), (b), (c) (1) and (c) (3) of said Section 4000 are applicable to this special election. 6. This Board of Directors acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered to each of the qualified electors of the District a ballot in the form set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto. Each ballot indicates the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner to which it pertains. Each ballot was accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. The envelope to be used to return the ballot was enclosed with the ballot, had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of pe@ury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration described in clause (b) above, and (e) a notice R:INORTONLL4GEArDASIRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196 that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board. Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures are hereby waived, as provided in Section 53327 of the Act, by reason of the waiver set forth in each of the voted ballots and as otherwise permitted by the Act. 7.The Secretary shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the meeting room of this Boardof Directors upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether said ballots be personallydelivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available at said location ballots which may be marked on the election day by said qualified electors. 8. This Board of Directors hereby further finds that the provisions of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified electors of the District. The voted ballots of the landowners within the District contain a waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election, and any requirement for analysis and arguments for the ballot measure. Accordingly, this Board of Directors finds and determines that said qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Board of Directors also finds and determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election. 9. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish in a newspaper of general circulation circulating within the area of the District a copy of this Resolution and a copy of the Resolution to Incur Indebtedness, as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC Secretary, City Clerk R:INORTOAEL4GEIVDASIRESOS@SPECELECRES 04112196 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NAYS: BOARD MEMBERS; ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINIED: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk R:VNORTONLIAGEJVDASIRESOSiSPECELECRES 04112196 EXHIBIT A OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) OFFTCIAL BALLOT SPECIAL TAX ELECTION This ballot is for a special, landowner election. You must return this ballot, sealed in the accompanying postage paid envelopoe to the City Clerk of the City of Temecula, acting as the Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. Please return the executed ballot sealed in the accompanying envelope to the City Clerk as soon as possible, but in any event so that it is received by the City Clerk by April 23, 1996. You may mail the executed return envelope with the ballot sealed inside, or hand deliver it to the City Clerk. The City Clerk's office is located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting line after the word 'YES", the word 'NO' or after the word 'ABSTAIN". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk and obtain another. BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of the sale of such bonds on behalf of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District'), the proceeds of which will be used to finance certain public improvements; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the public improvements, the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the District in administering the District, and shall the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $27,500,000? YES: NO: ABSTAIN: By the execution in the space provided below, you also indicate your waiver of'any time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the California Government Code. R:INORTOArLL4GENDAStRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196 Number of Votes: Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Numbers of Property Owned: Property Owners: By: R:INORTONLL4GENDASIRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN V,iHERF,AS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), this Board of Directors on this date adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Calling Special Election', calling for a special election of the qualified electors within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District'); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said resolution, which are by this reference incorporated herein, said special election was held on this date, and the Secretary of the Authority has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A"; and AS, this Board of Directors has reviewed said Canvass and hereby approves it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: I . The issues presented at said special election were the incurring of a bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, the levy of a special tax within the District to be levied in accordance with the formula heretofore approved by this Board of Directors by its resolution adopted this date entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area public Improvements), Authorizing Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District', and the approval of an annual appropriations limit of not to exceed $27,500,000 pursuant to said resolution. 2. Pursuant to said Canvass on file with the Secretary of the Authority, the issues presented at said special election were approved by the qualified electors of the District by more than two-thirds of the votes cast at said special election. R: @NORTONLL4 GEA7)ASLRESOSITAMEN. RES 04112196 3. Pursuant to said voter approval, the District is hereby declared to be fully formed with theauthority to incur bonded indebtedness and to levy special taxes as heretofore provided in theseproceedings and in the Act. 4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this Board of Directors with respect to the District were valid and in conformity with the Act. 5.The Secretary of the Authority is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded inthe office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Act. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC Secretary, City Clerk R:WORTOAEL4 GENDASIRESOSITA)AJEN.RES 04112196 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96-- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NAYS: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk R: TNORTONL L4 GEAVA SIRESOSI TAXLJEN. RES 04112196 EXHI]BIT A CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF SPECIAL ELECTION Old Town/Westside Comimunity Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public improvements) I hereby certify that on April 23, 1996, 1 canvassed the returns of the special election held on April 23, 1996, in the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and the total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct: Qualified Landowner Votes Votes Cast YES NO ABSTAIN Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Special Tax Election, April 23, 1996 189 BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), the proceeds of which will be used to finance certain public improvements; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the public improvements, the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the District in administering the District, and shall the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $27,500,000? R:INORTOAE L4 GEADA SIRESOSITAMEN. RES 04112196 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 23rd day of April, 1996. By: Secretary, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority R:tNORTOAILIAGEA7),4S[RESOSITAXUEN.RES 04112196 ORDINANCE NO. FA 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF D@TORS OF THE OID TOWN/WESTSI]DE CO FAC=M DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORffY LEVYING SPECL4,L TAXES WMHN THE OID TOWN/WESTSI]DE COMMUNrrY FAC DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNffY FACHMM DISTRICT NO. I (OID TOWN AREA PUBLIC D4PROVFAIENTS) WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982' (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to establish the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), to finance certain facilities; MMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution malting findings as to the complexity of the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution @er amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolutions, as adopted by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Resolution'); AS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the financing of the facilities (the 'Facilities') referenced in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending Resolution; WHEREAS, on March 26, 1996,this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance the costs of the Facilities; WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pe g to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial Ords.Fa\Ol evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a ftffl and fair hearing was held; S, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements ), Autho@g the Levy of a Special Tax Wi@ The District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District" (the "Resolution of Formation') 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District' and 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Calling Special Election', which resolutions established the District, autho@ the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively, and WHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE IT ORDA@, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rate and in accordance with the formula set forth in the Resolution of Formation which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1996-97 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the 'Bonds') and all costs of the District, including any costs of the administration thereof. 2. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to levied for each fiscal year for each parcel of real property and the interests therein the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds. 3. Properties or entities of the State or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes to the extent set forth in the rate and method of apportionment. of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. In no event shall the special taxes be Ords.Fa\Ol 2 levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. 4. All of the collection of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the payment of the costs of administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. 5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the tax rolls of the County of Riverside, and the special taxes shall become delinquent at the same time as other taxes collected on such rolls. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the appropriate officials of the County, and to take all action necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all other costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may collect one or more installments of the special taxes by means of direct billing of the owners of real property located within the District, and any intsallment so billed shall be delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. Further, the procedure on foreclosure of property for delinquent special taxes shall be as described in the Section 7 of the Resolution of formation and as further specified in the fiscal agreement providing for the terms of any bonds to be issued for the district to be repaid from the levy of such special taxes. Said procedures may allow for the bond owners or their representatives to credit bid delinquent amounts and penalties and interest and foreclosure costs at the foreclosure sale without posting or paying cash on other compensation, and other wise for reduced minimum bids and other expedited foreclosure procedures. 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. 7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the area of the District. Ords.Fa\Ol 3 8. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of @ passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPIED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/NVestside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATMT: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALEFORNIA COUNTY OR IDE ss CrrY OF ULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, BEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. FA 96-- was duly introduced at a regul-ir meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following roU call vote: AYES: BOARD ERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD ERS: ABST BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Autliority- Secre@ Ords.Fa\Ol 4 30043-01 JHHW:PJT:cra 08/28/95 J1820 03/24/96 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND AFM RECORDANON RETURN TO: Secretary Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority c/o City C-lerk, City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILMES DISTRICR FINANCING AUTHORM COMMUNrrY FACILMES DISTRICR NO. 1 (OLDTOWNAREAPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS) Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 5331 1, et. seq., of the California Government Code (the "Act"), the undersigned Secretary of the Old Town /Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority"), County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the Board of Directors of the Authority, County of Riverside, State of California. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds of which are being used to finance the public facilities described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and otherwise to pay the costs of such facilities directly and the costs of administering the below- mentioned community facilities district. The special tax is authorized to be levied within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements), which has now been officially formed and the hen of the special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied, and canceled in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the California Government Code. The rate, method of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special tax is as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Conditions under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied and the hen of the special tax canceled are as set forth in said Exhibit B. Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all nonexempt real property within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements), in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The name(s) of the owner(s) and the assessor's tax parcel number(s) of the real property included within this conununity facilities district and not exempt from the special tax are as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Reference is made to the third amended boundary map of the community facilities district recorded at Book - of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page _, in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which map is now the final boundary map of the community facilities district. For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property or interests therein subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Treasurer of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6444. Dated: 1996. By: Secretary, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority -2- EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CO TY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) FACILITIES 1.Renovation and Expansion of Old Town First Street Bridge, including but not limited to: a. preliminary design of First Street to its connection with the proposed Western Bypass Corridor to include a bridge over Murrieta Creek, b. obtaining all the permits and approvals which may be required, including City of Temecula, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Department of Fish and Wild Life, Riverside County Flood Control and any other permits and approvals as may be required, c. final design and construction of facilities as said design is approved by the reviewing agencies to include First Street from its intersection with Front Street to the proposed Western Bypass Corridor, d. design and construction of all utilities as may be required by the various utility companies to provide the required services to the proposed development and otherwise incident to the foregoing construction, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 2. Old Town Gateway Landscaping Project, including but not limited to: a. providing trees and other landscaping along the westside of Front Street between Front Street and Murrieta Creek from Rancho California Road to the Post Office, and street tree replacement in conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan, b. acquire the necessary right-of-way, c. submit a Landscaping plan to the City Planning Department for review and approval, d. construction and installation of the landscaping in accordance with the landscape plan as approved, and e.all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 3. Old Town Demonstration Block, including repairs, reconstruction and/or upgrades to Front Street, Front Street between First Street and Main Street and other incidental street improvements, and also including, but not limited to: a. provision of a conceptual design and submission to the City Planning Department for review and approval for the following: i. landscaping and lighting; ii. public signage, including Gateway entry sign, directional signs, and street name polesigns; and iii. street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk (boardwalk), paving, street lighting with sound system, street furniture to include wood benches, trash receptacles, newspaper racks, mailboxes, bus shelters, phone booths, and drinking fountains, all in general conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan, and the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, b. preparation of the necessary plans, specifications for the above scope of work and submit for review by the City and other interested parties as may be necessary, c. construct the facilities as per approved plans, d. topography for all of the Old Town shall be provided to facilitate design and to eliminate potential future drainage problems, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 4. Old Town Sewer Improvements, including but not lin-tited to: a. determine, based on the City's Ultimate Plan, Old Town Specific Plan and Westside Specific Plan, including the proposed Entertainment Facilities, the location of existing and need for upgrading sanitary sewer facilities, and any new sanitary sewer facilities, b. present the report to the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the City for review and approval, c. design the facilities for the sanitary sewer improvements based on the approved report, d. obtain any right-of-way that may be necessary to construct said improvements, e. construct said improvements to the satisfaction of EMWD, and f. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 5. Old Town Water System, including but not limited to: a. determine, based on the City's Ultimate Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Westside Specific Plan and the proposed Entertainment Facilities, the location of existing water systems, the needed upgrading, and needed new water facilities, b. present the report to Rancho California Water, City and Fire Marshall for review, c. design the facilities as needed and obtain approval by the above agencies, d. obtain the necessary right-of-way for the proposed improvements, e. construct said improvements to the satisfaction of Rancho California Water District, and f. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 6. Storm Drain Improvements, including but not limited to: a. determine the adequacy of the storm drain system as proposed in the Old Town Specific Plan (i.e., 3rd and 6th Street storm drains, 1-15 to Murrieta Creek), b. design said improvements and obtain all necessary permits for the installation of said improvements (permits may include but not be limited to Riverside County Flood Control District, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, and Caltrans), c. construct the improvements in accordance with the approvals of all the above agencies including the City, d. provide for the necessary facilities along these systems to accept local drainage, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances. 7. Construction of a new roadway as a four (4) lane divided roadway from near the Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a distance of approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided roadway, will be constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent Moraga Drive, approximately 1,200 feet. Roadway grading will be completed for the future extension of the Western bypass corridor approximately 3,400 feet from Vincent Moraga Drive to join Rancho California Road. The work will include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) acquisition of necessary right-of-way, (b) construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and Rancho California Road, (c) construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, (d) construction of roadway between the curbs, consisting of an approximately 78 foot wide roadway with an approximately 12 foot wide raised median island, (e) installation of landscaping and irrigation, (f) installation of water system facilities, (g) installation of sanitary sewer system, (h) installation of street lighting system, (i) construction and/or installation of any facilities or appurtenances incident to any of the foregoing, and (j) costs of engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public easements, planning, insurance, legal and accounting expenses and coordination related to the above-listed facilities. 8. The elimination of any fixed special assessment liens imposed on any property located in the District pursuant to assessment proceedings to finance all or any portion of the improvements described in the preceding Section 7. OTHER Costs of engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public easements, planning, insurance, legal and accounting expenses and coordination related to the above-listed facilities. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisals, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond counsel, special tax consultant, financing consultant, bond and official statement printing and all other incidental expenses. Administrative fees of the City of Temecula, the Authority, the District and the Bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and the Bonds. -2- EXHIBIT B [insert Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax here] B-1 DMBIT C ASSESSOR!S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNERS OF LAND WITHIN OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Assessor's Parcel Nos. Names and Addresses of Prol2erty Owners C-1 t ITEN4 26 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIR CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Starlight Ridge - Traffic Safety Investigation PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council support the findings of the attached Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study. BACKGROUND: The following report has been prepared at the request of the City Council to document and quantify traffic operations within the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. After years of working with specific individuals within this tract, we have been requested to conduct a comprehensive traffic analysis of all streets within Starlight Ridge with focus on the five residential collector streets listed below: 1 . Cosmic Drive 2.Santa Cecilia Drive 3.Asteroid Way 4.Southern Cross Road 5. Agena Street The entire length of Santa Cecilia Drive has been analyzed even though a portion is within the Lake Village neighborhood. We specifically looked at 20 intersections internal to Starlight Ridge and 4 access points to the surrounding arterial street systems. Our investigation covered five (5) years of history and includes tested and approved Traffic Engineering Techniques. We have documented existing traffic volumes and sampled vehicle speeds utilizing pneumatic traffic counters. This effort was very important in order to quantify citizen perceptions of vehicle speeds and volumes. We then analyzed all data collected including all accidents reported from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1995. Our field investigation included a complete study of each of the twenty (20) intersections to gather information regarding horizontal and vertical alignments, intersection sight distance restrictions, intersection safe approach speeds, roadway widths and existing pedestrian facilities. Our office research included the review of subdivision development plans to check roadway grades, widths and curve radii. Staff also gathered -1- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\starlight.rpt/ajp information from our emergency response agencies. Temecula Police and Fire representatives have been contacted and questioned as to the impacts of potential traffic calming techniques. The Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study, submitted under separate cover, should provide the comprehensive analysis needed to decide what further actions would be appropriate for this neighborhood. The cost of implementing staffs recommendation is approximately $1,050.00 and is detailed below. FISCAL IMPACT: Install five (5) 'Stop' signs at $125 each $600.00 Remove six (6) 25 MPH signs at $50 each $300.00 Sandblast existing speed limit legends at $25 each $150.00 TOTAL $1,050.00 Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Account No. 100-1 64-602-5244. ATTACHMENTS* 1 . Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 2.Location map with project recommendations -2- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\starfight.rpt/ajp Remove Existina Speed Limit s' ZD igns Install "STOP" sign Request BUSH Trimming CALII' c @l- Reques Request TREE Trimmina Trimmincy Install " STOP" s' I "STOPF' SiLyn quest BU Trimming Install "STOP" sigi VISTA GENERAL REQUEST TO CLEAR THE EXITING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN USE PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT t'At' ST IRLI IIT IIZID E ,NFET'Y T DY CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION April 16, 1996 STARLIGHT RIDGE TRAFFIC STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT I-HSTORY A.Traffic Requests B.Issues Taken to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission C.Collision lestory D.Public Feedback II.EXISTING CONDITIONS A.Traffic Volumes B.Vehicular Speed Data C.Roadway Classifications Ill. POTENTIAL SAFETY @ROVEMENTS A.Stop/Yield Controls B.Striping Collector Streets C.One-Way Streets D.Speed Undulations E.Roadway Narrowing F.Road Closures G.Sidewalks H.Posting Speed Limits 1. Enforcement J.Public Awareness Program IV.RECO@NDATIONS A.Stop/Yield Controls B.Striping Collector Streets C.One-way Streets D.Speed Undulations E.Road Narrowing F.Road Closures G.Sidewalks H.Posted Sped Limits 1. Enforcement J.Public Awarenes Program STARLIGHT RIDGE TRAFFIC STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES Table "A!' Starlight Ridge - Summary of Stafrs Efforts Table "B" Collision Hstory-Intemal Roadways and Surrounding Intersections Table "C" Internal Accident Specifics Table "D" Speed and Volume Analysis E ITS Exhibit "N' Daily Vehicular Volumes Exhibit "B" Data Collection Stations Exhibit "C" Average Speed Data Exhibit "D" Critical Speed Data Exhibit "E" Residential Collector Street System Exhibit "F' Typical Street Section-Collector Street Exhibit "g' Typical Street Section-General Local Street Exhibit "IT' Access Road, Restricted Local Street or Minor Interior Street Exhibit "I" Caltrans Traffic Manual Exhibit "Y' Starlight Ridge Stop Survey Exhibit "K" Intersection Numbering for Stop/Yield Analysis Exhibit "L" Potential Striping Configuration Exhibit "Nf Affected Area Exhibit for Collector Striping Exhibit "Y' Speed Undulation Analysis Exhibit "O" General Request to Clear the Exiting Public Right of Way to Encourage Pedestrian Use APPENDIX Appendix "X' Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Reports and Pertinent Portions of the Minutes Appendix "B" Count/Speed Profile Data Sheets Appendix "C" Portions of the California Vehicle Code Appendix "D" Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets Appendix "E" Citizen Letters Regarding Starlight Ridge 2 Ft7%.b-\9@V"ofcm rh STARLIGHT RIDGE TRAFFIC SAFETY STUDY L PROJECT HISTORY In order to understand the extensive effort dedicated to improving traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood, it is important to review previous work efforts provided by the Department of Public Works. This includes direct communication with citizens, items taken to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission (PTSC) and a five (5) year collision history. Public feedback is also included to document public communications with the Department of Public Works. A. Traffic Requests The Traffic Division of the Department of Public Works logs and tracks citizen requests when unable to completely address their concerns during initial communications. Table "X' is a record of all interactions with the neighborhood of Starlight Ridge between June 1993, and March 1996. Because staff response does not always reflect the specific item requested, every citizen is notified of the recommended action and given the opportunity to appeal the decision. Of the twenty-one requests received in this area nineteen have been completed. This current effort should help to resolve those issues. B. ]Issues taken to the Public/Trafric Safety Commission (P/TSC) Due to requests received to close or modify certain public streets within Temecula, including Starlight Ridge, staff pursued the development of a policy to guide public officials in determining a community supported improvements that would be consistent throughout Temecula and equitable for the citizens that commit to its funding. This policy, which reflected efforts being implemented throughout the world, was first submitted to the P/TSC on August 25, 1994. Appendix "X' contains all of the agenda reports taken to the P/TSC regarding the approval of the policy for closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets and other issues generated from within Starlight Ridge. Between August of 1994 and February 22, 1996, the Commission has faced issues and concerns raised by members of Starlight Ridge, on eight (8) separate occasions. This reflects staff s and the P/TSC efforts to address all citizen concerns in a public forum. C. Collision History A main component of any historic review of traffic safety includes a complete assessment of the area's reported collision history. For this project, staff has reviewed all collision reports submitted to the Department of Public Works by the Temecula Police Department for any streets within Starlight Ridge, and it's adjourning roads. This is not the first time each of these reports have been reviewed. Every report is reviewed upon delivery to City offices, to identify operational improvements that could possibly reduce the probability of a future incident. Table "B" and Table "C' identifies all reported collisions within the Starlight Ridge I R:\Iaubem\96stuhte\@e.stu th area with the specific details of each incident. It also shows reported collisions at surrounding intersections accessing the arterial street system, for your reference. D. Public Feedback During the Starlight Ridge investigation, staff received feedback in the form of written and verbal correspondence. This feedback was immediately reviewed and incorporated into our project development. Staff felt that it is important to include copies of the letters received regarding this area of Temecula. Appendix "E" includes all written correspondence regarding this area of Temecula, that were submitted for our consideration and response. H. EXISTING CONDMONS In order to quantify existing traffic conditions within the Starlight Ridge area, the three most important data sets were collected. Traffic volumes, speeds and existing street system characteristics have been studied. An outside traffic counting firm was contracted to collect volume and speed information so that any allegations of data bias would be eliminated. We also modified this data collection effort, during our study, to rapidly accommodate citizen feedback received. A. Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes are an important indication of roadway operations. Traffic volumes were collected in August of 1995, and are listed in Table "D" and displayed on Exhibit "X'. The City of Temecula's General Plan identifies local streets as having a "qualitative limit of acceptable traffic volumes in a residential environment is approximately 2,000 vehicles a day". All of the streets in the Starlight Ridge area have existing volumes that are all below this acceptable limit. Appendix "B" contains copies of all of the speed and volume data collection sheets for each of the five (5) count locations. These printouts identify the 5 mph bracket that each vehicle fits into for each 15 minute period. B. Vehicular Speed Data Over the past three years, staff has received several phone calls from citizens in Starlight Ridge concerned about the speeds of vehicles as they pass their residence. Most of those contacts were with citizens that live on either Cosmic Drive, Santa Cecilia Drive, Agena Street or Asteroid Way. Staff has also received concerns regarding the speed of vehicles on Milky Way Drive, said to be generated by the large apartment complex. In order to obtain a representative sampling of existing speeds throughout this tract, speed counters were placed at those locations shown on Exhibit "B". Average speeds are shown for four streets based on data that was obtained in August of 1995. The location on Cosmic Drive was re-counted in March of 1996, due to feedback received from a nearby resident. A concern was raised that sampled speeds at a point on Cosmic Drive were not representative of the fastest area, and that a tree-trinuning operation could have negatively impacted our data. The new week-long data collection effort reflects similar information to the initial data collected, reinforcing a fairly low average speed, as shown on Exhibit "C". This also shows Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 2 R--\Iaub=@@tt\@e-stu rh TABLE "A" STARLIGHT RIDGE - SUMMARY OF STAFF' S EFFORTS RESPONSE ..... ...... DATE LOCATION ... REQUEST 06/16/93 Southern Cross at Agena St. All-Way Stop at intersection Installed 'Intersection Ahead' sign with advisory speed sign 06/29/93 Southern Cross west of Margarita Rd Remove 'Children at Play' sign Removed illegal sign 03/09/94 Moontide Court Radar Trailer Display Unit Radar Trailer placed 07/26/95 03/17/94 Cosmic Dr near Santa Cecilia Dr Slow vehicles Radar Trailer placed 08/09/95 05/26/94 Cosniic Dr at Santa Cecilia Dr Lower speeds & volumes Radar Trailer placed 08/09/95 10/20/94 Santa Cecilia Dr 25 MPH speed limit sign Radar Trailer placed 04/18/95 11/04/94 Milky Way Dr at Asteroid Way Speed limit signs Posted (4)-25 mph signs on Cosniic Drive, Radar Trailer 10/18/95 01/24/95 Rancho California Road & Cosmic Staff generated Evaluated for traffic signal installation 03/21/95 Asteroid Way Need stop & speed li@t signs Stops installed on Milky Way Dr at Astroid Way 03/23/95 Asteroid Way Meet with resident to discuss concerns Met with resident and Police Department representative 05/25/95 Starlight Ridge Check stop warrants at 4 intersections Installed 4 - 25 mph signs on Cosmic Dr 05/31/95 Santa Cecilia Drive Staff generated Applied and aquired a grant for sidewalk improvements 06/05/95 Santa Cecilia Dr - Mira Lonia Drive to Sidewalk and School Pedestrian signs Received grant for sidewalk installation & installed School Pedestrian Cosniic Drive signs 08/07/95 Milky Way Dr Speed undulations Does not meet criteria approved by City Council 08/07/95 Asteroid Way at Rancho Cal Rd Traffic signal Evaluate for Traffic Signal Priority List 10/05/95 Sky Terrace Dr Slow vehicles Police Traffic Division 11/15/95 Agena Street Relocate 'Not a Through Street" sign Work order completed 11/30/95 Cosmic Drive Staff generated Radar Trailer Placed 01/10/96 01/17/96 Starlight Ridge Meet to discuss potential traffic calming Met with Mr. Bruckman and Mr. Maston 01/23/9 Starlight Ridge Meet to discuss cost of their option Met with Mr. Bruckman and Mr. Maston Starlight Ridge Radar Trailer Requested Police Department implement Radar Trailer on Cos@c and Santa Cecilia. r:\Isuberm\%'4tarlite\surlight.thl rh TABLE "B" COLLISION HISTORY INTERNAL ROADWAYS .. ..... @1992 1994 @ST."ET@. 1993@. . ........... :@:PDO -URY PDO INJ PDO:." :INJ PDO INJ AGENA STREET 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ASTEROID WAY 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 COSMIC DRIVE 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1994 Vehicle hit parked car on Moontide Court PDO - Prop@ Damage Only SURROUNDING INTERSECTIONS INTERSE ION 1992 994:@:@ 19 @1993: 9 1@991 Rancho California Road at Cosmic Drive/Humber 1 1 0 4 3 Drive Rancho California Road at Asteroid Way/Yukon 0 1 1 0 5 Road Margarita Road at Southern Cross Road 0 0 0 0 0 Rancho Vista Road at Southern Cross Road 0 0 0 0 0 R-'\LAUBERM\96STARLrrE\COLLISON.HIS rh "TABLE C" STARLIGHT RIDGE INTERNAL ACCIDENT SPECIFICS CIDENT: E: ]@DA 1991 Agena Street 11/17/91 4:3 5 p.m. Broadside Right of way violation Cosmic Drive 10/25/91 4:43 p.m. Head on Unsafe speed Santa Cecilia Drive 10/28/91 10:25 a.m. Broadside Right of way violation 1992 Agena Street 04/15/92 3:3 5 p.m. Mt object Unsafe speed 1993 Asteroid Way 05/27/93 10:44 p.m. Bicyclist-fall Drug /alcohol Cosmic Drive 12/31/93 1: 13 a.m. Mt object Improper turn 1994 j Moontide Court* 05/28/94 6:30 a.m. I-lit parked car Unsafe turn, inattention 1995 Santa Cecilia Drive 02/15/95 12:01 a.m. Head on Drug /alcohol Southern Cross Road 03/17/95 11:46 p.m. I-Et object Unsafe speed Incidents involved only one moving vehicle Susceptible to correction with minor street stops R:\m@\s@te@spe rh TABLE "D" SPEED AND VOLUME ANALYSIS TE@ @TTON 24 HOI(JR AVE GE'.. THEO@TI L. S. T FFIC...:@:.. SPEED PE CENT]ILE POS VOLUMT SPEED Santa Cecilia Drive, south of Agena Street 08/15/95 Northbound 635 32 mph 38 mph 35 mph Post "25 MpW' school zone at west end. 08/15/95 Southbound 651 31 mph 36 mph 35 mph Southern Cross Road west of Virgo Court 08/15/95 Eastbound 443 27 mph 33 mph 30 mph 08/15/95 Westbound 457 20 mph 36 mph 30 mph Agena Street west of Cosmic Drive 04/03/96. Eastbound 201 27 mph 33 mph 25 mph Recounted, questionable data for eastbound 08/15/95 Westbound 239 26 mph 31 mph 25 mph traffic. Astroid Way between Mlky Way Drives 08/15/95 Northbound 232 32 mph 40 mph 35 mph 08/15/95 Southbound 385 30 mph 36 mph 35 mph R:\LAUBERM\9MARLrrE\SPEEDVOL.TBD rh SI @DATE..@@ DIRECTION. 24 HOUR.@@ :AVFRAGE @85TH THEORFTICAL@ TRAF.'FIC@@: SPEED@:@ PERCENTILF,.@@@ @POSTING @VOLUME SPEED Cosmic Drive, south of North Star Court 08/15/95 Northbound 791 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 08/15/95 Southbound 897 27 mph 32 mph 30 mph Cosmic Drive, between North Star Court and Twilight Court 03/20/96 Northbound 177 28 mph 34 mph 30 mph Partial count (4:00 pm to midnight) 03/20/96 Southbound 252 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (3:00 pm to @dnight) 03/21/96 Northbound 498 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/21/96 Southbound 592 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/22/96 Northbound 549 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/22/96 Southbound 602 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/23/96 Northbound 656 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday 03/23/96 Southbound 616 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday 03/24/96 Northbound 472 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday 03/24/96 Southbound 588 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday 03/25/96 Northbound 415 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Construction activity on Rancho California Road 03/25/96 Southbound 578 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Construction activity on Rancho California Road 03/26/96 Northbound 414 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/26/96 Southbound 709 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (midnight t PM) 03/27/96 Northbound 281 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph o 3:00 TABLE "D" SPEED @ VOL@ ANALYSIS 2 R:\LAUBER@STARLrrE\SPEEDVOL.TBD rh DATE @DMCTION. @@24@HOUR@ AVERAGE: :85TH THEO]KETICAL PERCENTILE POSTING TRAFFIC .@SPEED@@ VOLUME SPEED 03/27/96 Southbound 354 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (midnight to 3:00 pm) 03/27/96 Northbound 273 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (2:00 pm to midnight) 03/27/96 Southbound 389 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (2:00 pm to midnight) 03/28/96 Northbound 479 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/28/96 Southbound 671 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/29/96 Northbound 508 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/29/96 Southbound 591 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 03/30/96 Northbound 504 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday 03/30/96 Southbound 238 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (tube removed) 03/31/96 Northbound 352 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday 03/31/96 Southbound 569 28 mph 32 mph 30 mph 04/01/96 Northbound 467 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 04/01/96 Southbound 613 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 04/02/96 Northbound 438 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 04/02/96 Southbound 610 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph 04/03/96 Northbound 267 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (midnight to 2:00 pm) 04/03/96 Southbound 289 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (midnight to 2:00 pm) Weekday Northbound 533 29 mph 33 mph Av es Southbound 643 TABLE "D" SPEED @ VOL@ ANALYSIS 3 R:\LAUBER@ARLFMSPEEDVOL.TBD rh DAILY VEHICULAR VOLUMES Weekday Volumes @JLA MILI< RO@ 2 CAI-)I CANI 01 F A CT 0 RANCH z z EXHIBIT -i --WY RNIA) - I VISTA I DATA COLLECTION STATIONS EXHIBIT "B" AVERAGE SPEED DATA Nfiles per hour t-A MILI@ P, o@ I 2 CAI-)I CAN NOR STAF IVAN r, ALPI IA PL RTH RGO F RANCHO <( m ul A/Oyl 0 ficil EXHMIT that drivers travel at about the same speeds, on the average, with very little daily variations. Exhibit "D" shows the critical speed for each roadway, which is typically used as a bench mark speed for establishment of posted speed limits. C. Roadway Classirications After completing the field survey of each of the streets in Starlight Ridge, we found three (3) different road types throughout the development. These roadway types included five (5) residential collector streets at 44 feet wide, eight (8) residential local streets at 40 feet wide, and six (6) 32 foot wide cul-de-sacs. Exhibit "E" shows the collector street system that was established by the County of Riverside when this area was developed. Exhibits "F", "g' and "IT' are copies of the County's typical street sections for the three (3) roadway classifications identified above. M. POTENTIAL SAFETY ]IMPROVEMENTS Due to the general concern for safety within the Starlight Ridge neighborhood, staff has investigated ten (10) potential safety improvements including traffic calming strategies. The recently approved Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets (see Appendix "D") was used to guide our evaluation of all traffic calming possibilities. Although posting of stop signs are not an acceptable practice for speed control, twenty intersections were reviewed to determine potential safety improvements that could be realized by establishing additional stop or yield controls. A. Stop and/or Yield Controls In order to lend some insight into the methodology used in determining the appropriate location for intersection controls, I would like to review published information supplied by the internationally recognized Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The following is an excerpt from a very popular information handout regarding this issue. WHY DON'T THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS? A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective control devices when usedatthenghtplacewdundertherightconditions. Itisintendedtohelp &avers andpedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right-of-way. One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either b causing it to stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as toforce y the traffic to use other routes. "ere stop son are installed as "nuisances or "speed breakers ", there is a high incidence of intentional violation. In those locations where vehicles do stop, the speed reduction is effective only in the immediate i4cinity of the stop sign, andftequently speeds are actually higher between intersections. For these reasons, it should not be used as a speed control device. Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 3 R-,Uau@@@tc\@e.stu th CRITICAL SPEED DATA Tffiles per hour OAD Il@IM ùCAPI@ICF CANOII)A NOR STAF ,-@IVANI ALPI-IA PL CL RTI-I A [A p L- RANCHO <( CK [-LAz 'ONo,y,, 0 LY EXHILBIT Dv' RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREET SYSTEM ml 1REMORA ST ùCAPRICE CT 3CANrilDA DR NOR] S @AR L-PHA C:) C- 3 RCO VERONDA T T, 0 PL p m EXIIIEBIT "Flv RIW "W 44' '34' 10 A.C. mwowv r of" sum SECTION *B" IV/1w 44' 34' to 10,@ 4 Poor A.Cp"vEmr#r Prop Pmr . YLOPE cv@ SEE srD. NO. 212 rOR AC. ASE COUOP$tr D(KE DErAlL rw AVE AORR WIDrAf SMfTr Sf'CrfOOV Mg ALL COLLLrCrk7# SECTION CL s r,,ef, rs - 54'lAfPNO VLr&trov rS oov 4@- iplw CDMNM RWWA"S CVRAPASE AAV SWAWLR rV Of t?t rERmtwv or sm rts r Of,vf@ PAVIA'A rpvjrxwss?v of A5pmAtrcowcRrrf-. room mt!r/ol-,vriAL srpLrrrS ANO 5'ASPNAtr covcptrrtr rog ,Vrr,*/O" calwmrpclAL ON ,vousrq,At srplrfrs. 'ILI CUP& ANO ourri-R Pu se, rrptr 'A.f' uvt ess ormtr*w,sf, spt-clr/,.,7. EXHI]BIT "G'l RIW R/W 60, .40 /0' 32 f Art#. it d Pwr St oor A.C !14 Pro ovc SECTION "B" rED 9UMNAOt RIW 60, 40 lof - 32 1 A.C 6A.%Lr IL SECTION "A" C SOF&MAW M&r WV Or S&L m CURV AW IVOE r"V A - 6, IlovL I-SS SPCCINED. PAmr w.tori s rfflrrr se-rrlov ov #i'plw SEE STO. NO. 212 F70R AC. OIKE OErAlL EMIIIBIT "H" CD 406 Note: Right of way may not be required for some private streets. ,6 0 4b RIW RIW 50'MIN 32' Jor A.cpAvEwAfr SLOPE rEO SU~A" SECTION *B" #?/W kV/or 5 O' MIN. Aft#. 6'@ sioLrWALK -SiDeWALor A. c @mEv r 5tc Ix 9. SECTION "A" CONOtOvCD rNlcPrOvtsS Of a45t AIVO StIRrACt rO Of Otrffflm/wf'o or Solt rrsr 0) WIAIIAOUN PA VINC, FHIC OROVFS 5 to of ,!V;A,5pifAir coivcortrru. -10' m,,v Rlw is RrouiPFD rOv ACCF@'SS ROADS SEE STO. NO. 212 FOR A.C DIKE DETAIL ALL -UVO AOVD Gurrrq rr 7t rrpc A-6 Yovit-s, ormeef.-isL- sircip-&-o A school crossing may look dangerousfor children to use, causingparents to demand a stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a problem for 3 seconds while approaching and passing the intersection becomes aproblemfor a much longerperiod A situation of indecision is created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as a motorist. Normal gaps in traffic through which crossings could be made safely no longer exist. An intersection which previously was not busy now looks like a major intersectioil It really isn't - itjust looks like it. It doesn't even look safer and it usually isn't. Most drivers are reasonable and prudent with no intention of maliciously violating traffic regulations; however, when an unreasonable restriction is imposes it may result Invariant wolations In such cases, the stop sign can create afalse sense of security in a pedestrian and an attitude of contempt in a motorist. 7hese two attitudes can and often do conj7ict with tragic results. Well-developeg nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such controls become necessmy. 7hese guidelines take into consideration, among other things, the probability of vehicles arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, and the availability of safe crossing opportunities. The recognized guidelines used throughout the State of California are those contained in the Cafifomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Traffic Manual. Exhibit "I" consolidates the specific Caltrans warrants for Stops, All-Way Stops, and Yield controls. Exhibit "J" displays the results of applying each of these warrants to each of the twenty intersections as numbered on Exhibit "IC'. Of the eleven locations found to meet minor street stop warrants, seven (7) locations already have minor street stops. The intersection of Southern Cross Road and Spica Court only has one (1) minor street stop, and staff recommends installing a stop on the other minor street approach as war-ranted. Of the four (4) remaining intersections, three (3) are recommended for installation on the minor street approach. These three (3) intersect collector streets with elevated residential traffic volumes. The only location meeting warrants and not being recommend for controls is a "I" intersection between two (2) local streets. Staff has already made a recommendation to the P/TSC for stops on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive which was not supported by the Commission, but is again recommended. B. Striping Collector Streets Currently all of the residential collector streets within Starlight Ridge have 44 foot widths from curb to curb. Without any channelization (striping), the streets have eight (8) feet reserved for parking on each side of each street leaving 28 feet for two (2) way traffic. This means if cars are parked on both sides of the street and there are vehicles approaching, you have an effective lane width of 14 feet. When no cars are parked and there is no on-co@ng Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 4 P--\ia@\9@@te\@.stu rh CALTRANS TRAMC MANUAL STOP Siffns Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where wan-anted. A STOP sign may bewarranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exist: 1 .On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs. 2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway. 3At the intersection of two main highways. The highway tratic to be stopped depends on approach speeds, volumes, and turning movements. 4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. ù. On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less dm 10 miles per hour. 6.At an unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 7.At other m ons where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. Multi-way STOPS The "Multi-way Stop" installation may be useful at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic onthe intmmting roads is approximately equal. A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume oftra]Yic. Any of the following conditions may warrant a Multi-way STOP sign installation: 1 .Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the Multi-way stop may be an mterun measure that can be mstalled quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. 2.An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a Multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and lcft turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum traffic volumes (a)The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and (b)The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hours, but (c)When the 85-perccnfile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume wan-ant is 70 percent of the above requirements. YIELD SiErns The YIELD sign (RI-2) assigns right of way to tratic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need stop only when necessary to avoid interference with other traffic that is given the right of way. The YIELD sign may be warranted: 1.On a minor road at the entrance to an intersection where it is necessary to assign right of way to the major road, but where a stop is not necessary at all times, and where the safe approach speed on the minor road exceeds IO miles per hour. 2.On the entrance ramp to an expressway where an acceleration lane is not provided. 3Within an intersection with a divided highway, where a STOP sign is present at the entrance to the first road way and further control is necessary at the entrance to the second roadway, and where the median width between the two roadways exceeds 30 feet. 4.Where there is a separate or channelized right-turn lane, without an adequate acceleration lane. 5.Al any intersection where a special problem exists and where an engineering study indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by use of the YIELD sign. EXHIBIT "I" STARLIGHT RIDGE STOPS ALL-WAY STOPS YIELDS ACTION INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3a 3b 3c 1 2 3 4 5 COSMIC DRIVE @ x K K x x K x Mii1pr@ Sti66t stt)o @i@ 1)Nebula Lane 2) Twilight Coun K X x 'K X None 3) North Star Court K x x x x n K X X K X K X x @T T@' 4) Santa Cecilia Drive x x None 5) Borealis Drive x x K X None 6) Asteroid Way x x X j None 7) Agena Street x x K X None SANTA CECILIA DIUVE @ 8)Vcrdadero Place 9) Carino Place M' inor ]@@g 10) Escolacata Drive X None I 1) Agena Street X K Ix @.m AGENA STREET @ x 'K X X X K X X X K X X None 12)Candida Drive 13) Southem Cross Road x x x x X X X X X X X X None 14)Sky Tcrraix Drive x Ix l@ x I x Ix I X IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX inone SOUTHERN CROSS RD @ x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X None 15)Moontidc Court M.to 16) Spica Courtx x x x @@V X x x x x x x x x x x mor Str@t! S 17) Sky Terrace Drive x x x x x x X X X X X X K X X None MILKY WAY DRIVE @ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X IX None 18)Borealis Drive 19) Asteroid Way (North) x x x x X X X x x x x x x x Ix Bush te 20) Asteroid Way (South) x I x I x Ix I x Ix I x ix I x I x I x I x x x x Ix Ix inone &'Meets Warrant Meets Warrant & Already Installed n Vegetation RemovaVTrim Requested EXHIBIT "J" R@@UB@@.MLb IN i'ERSECTION NUMBERING 1REMORA ST ùCAPRICE CT 3CANDIDA DR ,4EVANI PL T, p < co cn 0 cr N STA ALPH VERON PL so/vo EXHMIT "K" FOR STOP/YIELD ANALYSIS IRGO T vehicles your effective lane width is 44 feet. This is not positive guidance and helps to explain the variations in vehicle speeds. Due to the fact that vehicles travel faster on wider roads with large side clearances, we feel that striping these collectors could possibly reduce vehicular speeds and should help to separate parked cars, bicycles and vehicular traffic, which would improve safety. This painting could certainly be viewed as a visual eye-sore for adjacent residents and a petition requesting citizen input is advised prior to further development. Exhibit "L" identifies a suggested striping pattern restricting two-way travel to the 20 feet in the center of each roadway. This also provides for a 23 foot separation between the travel way and the adjacent properties. The only two roads currently meeting the volume requirement in the Policy for Street Modifications are Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive. Exhibit "M' identified those lots that would be required to sign a petition identifying the need to participate in funding for this improvement. The costs associated with this striping configuration, if placed on Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive, is estimated to run approximately $1,500. C. One-Way Streets The installation of a one-way traffic restriction is not easily achieved. By far, the foremost obstacle to further the consideration of the one-way street alternative is the fact that a proximate couplet street must be present. With the reverse-direction couplet, volumes are split between two (2) routes. Typically, this means a reduction for one street, but an increase for the couplet. This increase is politically acceptable in most circumstances only if the street is already commercial by nature, and in need of additional traffic exposure. The one-way tool is impacted in many ways to the adjacent properties. Access becomes a constant irritant. However, the traffic efficiency of the route becomes vastly improved, as conflicting turning movements are eliminated. The one-way couplet setup can accommodate a high traffic demand with ease. Although not common, it is an option which should be considered if the logical couplet can be developed. The one-way couplet is a traffic calming tool which may provide both a perceived improvement to quality of life, and an actual improvement to traffic efficiency and safety. The street modification policy requires that an engineering safety study determine that the proposed traffic flow modification will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets which may be impacted by diverted traffic. Due to the lack of any one-way couplets for Cosmic Drive, Santa Cecilia Drive or Agena Street, this idea would only have negative ramifications to traffic efficiency and safety. Also, the creation of any one-way street would require a petition signed by all residents bounded by Rancho California Road, Margarita Road, Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive. D. Speed Undulations In 1993 the City of Temecula approved a policy to be applied to the potential implementation of speed undulations on public streets. Prior to the construction of speed undulations, the Starlight Ridge Tmffic Safet-y Study 5 R-,@Wft@te@.stu rh POTENTIAL STRIPING CONFIGURATION cu R-IM 2Z t>@E-L.INE (ujt*ITE) 16 q :SKIP (Yf-I.LOVUS I 0 zz/ L-Ak4E PP-C)i>F-r-,rly L-i"E E@IBIT "Lll- t A -i IA3 N _III -n %-L z VISTA I AFFECTED AREA EXHIBIT For COLLECTOR STRIPING EXHMIT "Mot STARLIGHT RIDGE SPEED UNDUIATION ANALYSIS Prior to iconstructi6 @@@bf 6@d . COSMIC., @:@S !D@ SO.UMER N. I @@:AGENA @@@@@:@@STIREET idati(sh ih @i bi tt@t DPJ ROAD@@ meet fOI16 it6 i i@ i 1)A "Speed Undulation Petition" signed by at least sixty-five (65%) of the affected property owners shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division. 2)The average daily traffic shall range @.@3 5 8 @'.533@ 340 ............ between 1,200-2,500 vehicles in a twenty- four (24) hour period. .. .. .. ..... .. . .. .. .. .. .... .... ..... .. 3) The speed limit shall be no greater than 25 mph . . .. ..... ..... twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State law. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. ..... . .. .. ..... 4) At least sixty percent (60%) of the 67% surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five (25) mph speed limit. 5) The subject street: 44'@ @i @44t@ 44 44' 40' a.Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide unless approved by City Engineer, b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic 2 2 2 2 2 lanes. c. Shall not have a grade greater than 1: 5@%@ 5.1% @io 00/0@ < 5% ..... .. five percent (5%) in the section where "M Max .. ..... .. . undulations are to be constructed. d. Shall be at least one quarter (1/4) mile > 1,320' > 1,320' > 1,3201 > 1,320' in length. e.Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features. f Shall not be a truck route or transit route. Shall not be an important access route 'Access :::Accegs@ Access.: @.::Access R6iit6 @Rbute for emergency vehicles. te. h.Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City Engineer. 6/ Meets criteria Does not meet criteria Basic speed law No person shall dfive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a s@ which endangers the safety of persons or prope@. EXHIBIT "N"9 R:ILALM TARLITE\UNDULATN.ANA rh subject street section shall meet the criteria shown on Exhibit "N'. The five (5) most highly traveled roadways within this tract has been evaluated and found to not meet the required criteria. E. Roadway Narrowing In Australia, Europe, and in various American cities, there is an application of width restrictions, particularly within intersections, with the intention of creating "slow points" along a corridor. The intersection areas typically provide the agency with existing right-of- way within which to construct traffic circles, landscaped circle medians, necking, and angled or constricted vehicular paths. Narrowing of a route outside of an intersection is also utilized, particularly in Australia, to either horizontally deflect, or to "squeeze" traffic through short areas where there is no shoulder comfort zone. The reasonable drivers will slow in these areas and proceed cautiously. As can be anticipated, there is a risk management concern for creating a public hazard which must be countered with proper design review, the application of traffic warning devices, sight- distance concerns, etc. The concept of roadway narrowing to slow vehicles can be proven by driver reaction, yet it runs directly contrary to the policies of highway safety long employed in the United States. As the road widens with the provision of a clear shoulder area fi7ee of obstacles, the speeds increase incrementally, yet the accident rate drops dramatically. Hghway designers in America have for decades smoothed traffic and made it more efficient by widening lanes, providing shoulders, and removing obstacles. The application of horizontal narrowing to calm traffic, is the opposite side of the coin. By making the roadway appear more dangerous, traffic will slow. In America for reasons of liability exposure, the trick is how to make it appear to the driver to be dangerous, yet not operate less safely. The primary purpose of a roadside treatment such as a curb extension or other horizontal narrowing is to transmit a message to approaching traffic that they are not on an arterial street. It has long been the practice of roadway engineers to smooth the flow of traffic and increase the safety margin by widening streets and creating an obstacle-free shoulder or buffer area. With calnidng as an objective, the contrary measures of introducing obstacles into the buffer areas in order to present a less forgiving environment are applied. Most typically, roadside treatments consist of a choker treatment limiting the width of the street either at selected @d-block locations, or most commonly at intersections. The narrowing has a secondary impact of making a more controlled pedestrian crossing. Statistics can show that traffic accidents are more likely to occur in areas which look open and clear of conflict, but which have hidden obstacles. Roadways with more apparent obstacles sometimes operate with better accident rates than roadways with subtle shortcomings. With traffic cal@ng, an intentional and obvious constricted environment is presented to incoming traffic in the attempt to reduce the comfort level of the driver and increase alertness and reduce speed. Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 6 R-\Iau@@@te@@e-stu rh There are indications that there may be an improvement in accident rate in some cases. However, the low overall rost-effectiveness of this option, combined with possible problems in emergency services and increased liability exposure, make it difficult for most authorities to endorse the application of obstacles into the roadway environment as a worthwhile traffic management device unless a very serious problem is documented. F. Road Closures None of the roadways within the Starlight Ridge tract meet the criteria for public street closures as defined in the Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. Traffic volumes on a qualifying street segment must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day. The highest daily volume recorded in this neighborhood was 1,688 on Cosmic Drive in August of 1995. This value even seems suspiciously high since all other counts conducted reflected approximately 1,200 vehicles a day on Cosmic Drive. Any street closure would also create unreasonable traffic on streets impacted by diverted traffic. Public Safety agencies have been contacted to discuss potential impacts of collector street closures within Starlight Ridge. Their concerns can not be quantified without a specific project definition. Serious issues of restricting certain areas from providing a secondary access option. The creation of long, dead-end streets would negatively impact emergency services. Another concern which should be anticipated with the closure option is the physical difficulty of constructing adequate roadway geometry at the closure point. Most often, there is not sufficient public right-of-way available to provide for a turnaround area on the terminated street segment, requiring expensive land acquisitions. G. Sidewalks Our comprehensive field review of Starlight Ridge, reconfirmed the lack of sidewalks throughout this residential tract. This information was first uncovered during the creation of a suggested route to school map for Vail Elementary School. During the development of school pedestrian routes by the Temecula Valley Unified School District, Police Department and City staff-, Santa Cecilia Drive was established as the primary travel path for numerous elementary school students. As part of our yearly submittal for SB 821 pedestrian and bicycle facility grant funds, Santa Cecilia was placed as number one among our 4 proposed improvements. We have been approved for the 1995 grant cycle funding for a sidewalk along the entire length of Santa Cecilia Drive fi7om Vail Elementary School (Nfira Loma Drive) to Cosmic Drive on the north side. Design is complete and staff will be requesting award of a construction contract in the near future. Along many of the property frontages, residents have kept the I I foot parkways clear of pedestrian obstructions. Staff recommends that the Homeowners Association support staffs efforts to provide clear travel paths within the existing right-of-way along all internal streets Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 7 R:\Iaubcrm@wbte\@.stu rh to encourage appropriate pedestrian behaviors. Staff will continue to support the education of students regarding safe pedestrian activities. H. Posting Speed Limits A common belief is that posting a speed limit will influence drivers to drive at that speed. The facts indicate otherwise. Research conducted in many parts of this country over a span of several decades has shown that drivers are influenced more by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing traffic conditions than by the posted speed limit. Califomia's Basic Speed Law requires that: "No person shall drive a vehicle upon a high%W at a speed greater than is responsible or prudent having due regardfor weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. " Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is now 70 mph. All other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which "on the face of it" are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain pfim facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts, the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad crossings and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school. The speeds are not always required to be posted, however, all Cafifomia motorists are required to know the basic 15 mph, 25 mph, and the maximum speed limit laws. Intermediate speed limits between 25 mph and 70 mph, may be established by local authorities on the basis of traffic engineering surveys. These surveys include an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers. If speed limit signs are posted for a lower limit than is needed to safely meet these conditions, many drivers will simply ignore the signs. At the same time, other drivers will stay within the posted limits. This generally increases the conflicts between faster and slower drives, reduces the gaps in traffic though which crossings could be made safely and increase the difficulty for pedestrians to judge the speed of approaching vehicles. Studies have shown that where uniformity of speed is not maintained, accidents generally increase. Starlight Ridge streets fit into three different roadway classifications as per the County of Riverside Street Standards. Of the three different roadway sizes, two different speed limits apply. For those non-collector streets 40 feet wide or narrower, the 25 mph prima facie speed applies. For those streets greater than 40 feet wide (Cosmic Drive, Santa Ceclia Drive, Asteroid Way and portions of Mlky Way Drive and Agena Street) the basic speed law applies. Appendix "C" contains sections of the California Vehicle Code that pertains to the application of speed limits within the entire state. This appendix contains Section 515 which Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 8 R:\Ia@\9@@te\tm@.stu rh defines a 'residence district', Section 22350 which defines the 'Basic Speed Law', Section 22352(b)(1) which qualifies the 25 mph speed limit in a residence district and Chapter 3, Section 40802(b)(1) illegal evidence - speed trap restriction. Based on these code sections, the above named streets do not meet the 25 mph prima facie speed limit because they are greater than 40 feet wide; 44 feet to be exact. Sections 22357 and 22358 authorize local authorities to establish prima facie speed Emits on streets and roads under their jurisdiction, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. Speed limits should be established preferably at or near the 85 percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. The 85 percentile is often referred to as the critical speed. Speed limits higher than the 85 percentile are not generally considered reasonable and safe and limits below the 85 percentile do not facilitate the orderly movement of traffic. Speed Emits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and safe, and are not dependent on the judgement of one or a few individuals. The basic speed law states that no person shall drive at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent. The majority of drivers comply with this law, and disregard regulations which they consider unreasonable. It is only the top fiinge of drivers that are inclined to be reckless and unreliable, or who have faultyjudgement and must be controlled by enforcement. Only when roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, are speed limits somewhat below the 85 percentile warranted. Section 22358.5 of the Vehicle Code states that it is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Speed zones of less than half a mile and short transition zones should be avoided. Other factors that need to be considered are the most recent two-year accident record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks, etc. Speed Trap-Section 40802(b) provides that prima facie speed limits established under Sections 22352(b)(1), 22354, 22357, 22358 and 22358.3, may not be enforced by radar unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last five years. An engineering and traffic survey is required where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic speed measuring devices. 1. Enforcement The enforcement of the rules of the road, or the threat of enforcement, has long been a most effective tool in achieving reasonable driving practices. Although a point can be made that law enforcement should be applied to other priorities, there are programs designed to maximize the effectiveness of traffic law enforcement. Each community should apply these Starlight Ridge Trafric Safety Study 9 P--@@te@.stu rh Remove Existing Speed Limit signs Install "STOP" sign ) t Request BUSH Trimming CAL R( est TREE Trimming Trimmin Install "STOP" sign Install "STOP" Reque Trimnu Install "STOP" sig VISTA GENERAL REQUEST TO CLEAR THE EXITING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN USE PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT Ito it techniques as effectively as possible, and address directly the minority of drivers which create the vast majority of consternation in these sensitive neighborhood areas. Speed limit enforcement in Starlight Ridge has been discussed numerous times with Temecula Police Traffic Officers. All Starlight Ridge speed profiles have been forwarded to the Temecula Police Department to be utilized in selecting specific enforcement times to efficiently utilize their existing staff. The enforcement issue has previously been addressed before the City Council by the Police Department. J. Public Awareness Program The backbone of staffs Public Awareness Program is our Radar Trailer Display Unit. This piece of equipment is used to remind motorists of the legal speed limit and at the same time display actual vehicle speeds. This has been an extension of law enforcement presence in mostly residential areas. The placement of this equipment is handled by the Police Department with input from the Department of Public Works. Staff is currently investigating the purchase of a recording device that will greatly expand our current data collection efforts. IV. Recommendations The following reconunendations are for the entire Starlight Ridge neighborhood and the western end of Santa Cecilia Drive. A. StopNield Controls Staff recommends the installation of the following minor street stops. 1.On Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive (2 signs with limit lines) 2.On Nebula Lane at Cosmic Drive (I sign with a limit line) 3 .On Cafino Place at Santa Cecilia Drive (I sign with limit line) 4.On Spica Court at Southern Cross Road (I sign and limit line for eastbound) Staffdoes not recommend the creation of any all-way stops or the installation of any yield signs. It is recommended that vegetation is trinuned at four (4) locations as shown on Exhibit CCO5@ . B. Striping Collector Streets Staff does not recommend stfiping of any collector streets within Starlight Ridge. We are open to the efforts of the community to pursue citizen approval and funding for the improvement. The proper procedure is defined in the Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. C. One-Way Streets Staff does not recommend the creation of any one-way streets within Starlight Ridge. This application does not lend itself to this area because of the lack of couplet streets. Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study I 0 F-"Uu@@@te\@.stu rh D. Speed Undulations Staff does not recommend the installation of any speed undulations based on applicable City policy. None of these collector or local streets qualify. E. Road Narrowing Staff does not recommend narrowing any of the streets within Starlight Ridge because a serious safety problem has not been documented. F. Road Closures Staff does not recommend closing any streets within this area. None of the area streets carry enough traffic to be considered for a complete road closure per our approved policy. G.Sidewalks Staffsupports current efforts to construct a sidewalk on Santa Cecilia Drive from Cosmic Driveto Mra Loma Drive. We also support efforts to clear the existing right-of-way of all pedestrian obstruction in order to promote pedestrian travel outside of the paved roadway. H. Posted Speed Limits Staff recommends the removal of all 25 mph speed limit signs within this tract. Based on roadway widths, these collector streets do not qualify as a residence district. The Police Department has been informed of this new development. Staff does not recommend conducting engineering and traffic studies to establish speed limits within the tract, based on collision history and the relative short lengths of these roadways. The basic speed law applies and is appropriate. LEnforcement Staffrecommends that the Police Department determine appropriate enforcement efforts neededwithin this tract. J.Public Awareness Program Staffreconunends discontinuing the current Public Awareness Program which focusses on collector streets. We will consider applying a similar effort for 25 mph roads if a speeding concern is reported. Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study P--@@@te@.stu rh In addition to these recommendations, staff will pursue: I .Placing "25 mph School Zone" signs at all approaches to Vail Elementary School on Mra Loma Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive. 2.Work with the citizens of Starlight Ridge to clear the public right-of-way of obstructions in order to provide safe pedestrian links around Starlight Ridge. Even though this list of improvements seem to mitigate all identified neighborhood short comings, staff will be more than happy to work with the citizens of Starlight Ridge if they can document a 75% approval to fully fund any appropriate traffic caln-dng strategy.+ Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 12 R-\Ia@@@\@,sta rh ,KPPE DI)C 66)kl9 AGENDA REPORT TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:August 25, 1994 SUBJECT:Item 4 City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the draft Street Closure or Modification Policy. BACKGROUND: Due to requests to have the Department of Public Works close or modify public streets, the Traffic Division proposes to create a policy to guide public officials in order to ensure solutions that are equatable for the entire community. The State of California has preempted the field of traffic control (refer to Section 21 of the California Vehicle Code), and no local authority is allowed to enact or enforce any ordinance on the matters covered by the Vehicle Code unless expressly authorized by statute. It is the policy of the State that all persons have an equal right to use the streets and highways, and localities have no carte blanche and, absent express authority, may not determine which traffic shall and which shall not use streets. Based upon this policy, in the absence of specific State legislative authority to the contrary, a city may not restrict the right to travel upon one of its streets to its residents or to other exempted drivers. Some examples in the Vehicle Code of such specific authority to regulate travel upon streets are: if the City Council determines the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic [ 21 1 01 (a)]; if needed to implement the Circulation Element of a General Plan [ 21 1 01 (f)]; if due to criminal activity [211-01.41; regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages [(a)]; and on streets dividing school grounds to protect students attending such school or school grounds. When a local agency decides to utilize the express delegation of such authority, the local agency may only utilize 'office traffic control devices' authorized by the Vehicle Code. Additional, local authorities may not place gates or other selective devices on any street which deny or restrict the access of certain members of the public to the street, while permitting others unrestricted access to the street. PURPOSE OF POLICY Consistent with State law and policy, it is the general policy of the City to not allow temporary or permanent closure of any public street to vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or modification of traffic flow on a public street will be considered, however, based on a petition which meets all the criteria and procedures outlined in the attached policy. The City will carefully review each street closure or traffic flow modification request to ensure that the proposed location and attending circumstances meet all the criteria outlined in our policy and in State law described above. The purpose of this policy is to set forth the process and r. \ag@k%%0825/ajp criteria by which modification of traffic flow or closure of public streets may be considered by the City Council and to identify the conditions under which closures or modifications may be enacted. This policy only applies to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets initiated by citizens. This policy will not apply to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets initiated by the City to address specific traffic safety issues or to comply with State and Federal standards and warrants. This policy also will not apply to temporary changes in traffic that are needed to stage special events in the City. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1.Draft Street Closure or Modification Policy 2.Appendix 'A' PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AUGUST 25,1994 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Perry NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero 4.City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report regarding the draft Street Closure or Modification Policy. Commissioner Sanders inquired if the policy referred to only residential streets. Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that residential streets are referred to as 'local streets' in the policy criteria. It was the Commissions recommendation to continue this item off calendar, to allow staff to do further research, receive additional input, and to bring back to the Commission at a later date. Chairman Perry called for a recess at 9:50 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:55 p.m. 5.Traffic Engineer's Report Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber repwed on the following: Pala Road/SR 79(S) Right Turn Lane - Caltrans coordination, received one bid which was over the engineers estimate, staff to recommend to City Council to reject bid and to re-advertise. Contacted Greyhound Bus Line Service - One stop in Temecula located on Jefferson Avenue at McDonaids. Contacted representative for RTA regarding Future Route Change Workshop on September 1 3, 1994. A representative will attend the workshop and provide their current schedule for the Temecula area. Contacted three shopping centers, two centers provided exhibits showing their on-site bus sites. Reviewed upcoming meeting dates, Commissioners Coe, Guerriero, Johnson and Perry will be attending the Traffic Commissioners Workshop, October 1 5, 1994 at Cal Poly, Pomona. 3 r\@ic\comxnissn\.ininutcm\0825.@sip AGENDA REPORT TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:September 22, 1994 SUBJECT:Item 4 Street Closure/Modification Policy RECOATION: Ilat the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets'. BACKGROUND: This policy was previously presented to the Commission in draft form for review and comment. A few items were discussed and requested to be incorporated into a fmal draft to be brought back for Commission approval. The Traffic Division recommended that specific wording changes be submitted prior to September 13, 1994 for incorporation, providing staff with clear direction. Commissioner Guerriero was contacted to solicit input since he was absent from the Commission meeting of August 25, 1994. The attached document, "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets", identifies staff's effort to include all items discussed at our meeting because no written changes were received. FISCAL IWACT: None Attachments: City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 22,1994 Co-Chairman Sander declared a recess at 8:25 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 p.m. 3.Speed Limit - Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report. Based on a survey of over 300 vehicles, 54 mph was the average speed. Based on this survey Mr. Lauber recommended that the speed limit be set at 50 mph. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to accept staff recommendation to set the speed limit to 50 mph, and recommend that staff look into installing a "Pavement End" or appropriate sign close to the intersection of Calle Medusa and Nicolas Road. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Guerriero NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry 4.Street Closure/Modification Policy Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets' in its original form with changes noted in strike-out form. Mr. Lauber also stated he is also w@king to update the travel forecast model for the City, and incorporate some streets in that system. If it can be funded it will be presented as a mini work station, the closest facility is in Riverside. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero that staff refer the Street Closure/Modification Policy to the City Attorney for review and comment as to its application as a general release document, and to make the document consistent by using the word "Property Owner" in place of "residents or long term renters". It was further directed that after review by the City Attorney the policy is to go directly to the City Council with copies to the Commission. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Guerriero NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry 3 r\@ic\commiaan\minutes\0922.@ajp AGENDA REPORT TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:April 27, 1995 SUBJECT:Itein 5 'Stop" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way RECOATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the installation of 'Stop' controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way. BACKGROUND: Ile Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. 7le major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge do not have any controls. Most of the intersections without controls are local street 'T' intersections. At these intersections, motorists are required to yield to traffic if they are approaching on the steam of the 'T'. There -is a provision in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) which regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW) at all "T' intersections. 'ne intersection of Milky Way Drive and Asteroid Way currently forms a four (4) way intersection without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven (7) conditions which indicate the possible need for stop controls. These warrants are listed below. 0 Warrants for STOP Signs Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. 'A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exist: I .On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs. 2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway. 3.At the intersection of two main highways. The highway traffic to be stopped depends on approach speeds, volumes, and turning movements. 4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. 5.On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour. 6.At an unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 7.At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. lnm&k95XO427/aip Staff has reviewed all conditions and found number 5 to apply to Milky Way Drive when approaching Asteroid Way. lberefbre staff recommends placing 'Stop' signs with @t lines on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way. FISCAL BWACT: 2 'Stop' Signs with Limit Lines at $150 each $300 Attachment- L,oc,ation Map \ag@N9S\0427/ajp CHURC14ILL LOHG IREMORA ST ùCAPRICE CT 3CANDIDA DR CA.'ONDA PL PO F-)( I -ST 1 t4 C>. 516- N A L, I ZE t)0EX% STI Cr :5-rOF' SI(," IWTF-P- 5 I- c -Fioti L-0 C AT-(Oro!S L-(l c A -I- I 0 tJS PUBLICITRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 27, 1995 Commissioner Sander spoke in favor of the School District's expansion of their existing parking facility. Commissioner Johnson asked staff if an ordinance was in force regarding the street sweeping schedule. Engineer Lauber responded that no ordinance existed, however, he will investigate this with Public Works and respond back to the Commission. The motion was made by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Perry to table action on this item for 30 days in order to give the school district time to educate the students to park in the expanded parking facility. The Commission will review this item and if approved, the "no parking' time limit will be 7:00 A.M. to 1 1:00 A.M. The motion carried as follows: A-YES: COMMISSIONERS: 4 Johnson, Sander, Guerriero, Perry NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 0 None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 Co e Chairman Johnson called a 9 minute recess. The meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission was reconvened at 8:35 P.M. Chairman Johnson presiding. 5."Stol2" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way Engineer Lauber reported on correspondence received from residents in Starlight Ri dge regarding traffic problems at the intersection of Milky Way Drive and Asteroid Way. Engineer Lauber stated that traffic warrant No. 5 exists and staff recommends approval. It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to recommend to City Council that "Stop" controls on Milky Way Driver and Asteroid Way be installed. inutes.Pts\042795 4 AGENDA REPORT 'ro:Publicl'rmffic Safety Commission FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:June 22, 1995 SUBJECT:Itein 2 Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive RECO NDATION: 'Mat the Publicfrraffic Safety Commission approve the installation of stop controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive. BACKGROUND: Ile Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. Ile major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge do not have any controls. More specifically, the Traffic Division was asked to evaluate the intersections of, Santa Cecilia Drive, Agena Street, Cosmic Drive and Asteroid Way. Three (3) of these intersections are local street 'T' intersections. At these intersections, motorists are required to yield to traffic if they are approaching on the steam of the 'T'. There is a provision in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) which regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW) at all 'T' intersections. If sight distance limitations exist, the posting of stop or yield signs are advised. All three (3) intersections have good approach visibility. 'ne intersection of Agena Street and Santa Cecilia Drive currently forms a four (4) way intersection without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven (7) conditions which indicate the possible need for stop controls. These warrants are listed below. 0Warrants for MP Signs Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exists: I . On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule, is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to coff ection by STOP signs. 2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway. 3.At the intersection of two main highways. Ile highway traffic to be stopped depends on approach speeds, volumes, and turning movements. 4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. r.\@ \sg@k95NO622/ajp 5.On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour. 6.At an unsi@ed intersection in a signalized area. 7.At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. Staff has reviewed all conditions and found number 5 to apply to Agena Street when approaching Santa Cecflia Drive. 'rberefore staff recommends placing 'Stop' signs with limit lines on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive. FISCAL @ACT: 2 - "Stop' Signs with Limit Lines at $150 each $300 Attachment: Location Map %n@-@95%06ZUajp ci vi 2 ul 0 n IRA w Ul '2 UJ %A :z LU PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 22, 1995 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2.Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive Director Joe Kicak, acting in the absence of Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, reported on a concern brought before the City Council in. support of stop-. controls on Agena- Street. Staff recommends approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, representing Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association spoke in support of stop controls or signals in the area. He reported on concerns for safety in the neighborhood by distributing additional background including speed reports. Commissioner Guerriero recommended a speed undulation program alternative. He would like this item on the next meeting agenda. He requested staff provide policy documentation to the Commission. Commissioner Perry responded that all residents would need to approve speed bumps and recommended the representatives contact everyone in the community. Commissioner Perry also asked if stop signs could be installed on Cosmic Drive instead of Santa Cecilia Drive. Director Kicak responded that this would not help and the lo cation needs to be warranted. Staff will conduct volume an@ speed studies. Lieutenant Domenoe will research the enforcement in the area. Commissioner Guerriero requested that a study of alternatives be presented to the Commission within 30 days. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, President of Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association, spoke with concern for safety in the area and would like to see a 4-way stop at Agena Street and Cosmic Drive and Agena Street and Santa Cecilia Drive. The home owners will try anything even speed bumps. Commissioner Coe requested staff look into this further. It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Perry to table the Stop Controls agenda item and bring it back to the Commission when the survey is completed. Minutes.Pts%062295 2 AGENDA REPORT TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:August 24, 1995 CT:Item 4 Starlight Ridge Traffic Study RECO ATION: 1.Ilat the Temecula Police Department implement a plan of consistent speed enforcement, and the Department of Public Works regularly schedule the Radar Trafler Display unit for Asteroid Way, Cosmic Drive, Agena Street, Santa Cecilia Drive and Southern Cross Road. 2.That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the installation of stop controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive. BACKGROUND: At the June 22, 1995 meeting of this Commission, staff brought forward a recommendation to place stop controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive (agenda report attached). After the staff report by Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, the item was opened for public comment. Ken Bruclanan representing the Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association presented the Commission with additional information which is attached. Although his memo covered a lot of issues, the four (4) predominant traffic issues were: I . The main roadway in Starlight Ridge are being used as a short cut. 2.Vehicle speeds are a problem. 3.The existing vehicle volumes are a problem. 4. Request to extend Moraga Road through to Mira Loma Drive'. I would like to respond to each of these concerns separately and then present our recommendations for the entire area. 1.In order to determine the exact number of cut-through traffic for the Starlight Ridge area, although not impossible, it would take a major effort completely out of the scope that could be provided by current City staff. To gage the overall roadway use compared with street capacity, estimated trip generation was calculated. Each single family resident is forecasted to generate approximately ten (10) trips per day. Staff has counted only single family residence in Starlight Ridge and came up with approximately 570 homes. Using this number, we can estimate that these homes could generate about 5,700 trips per day without including the apartments on the far east and west ends of the study area. If our counters only registered 50% of all internally generated trips Oocal not cut- through) we would have registered 2,850 vehicles per day. As shown in Table "A', we counted 2,963 vehicles per day. On a real general basis, this seems to indicate no or very little short-cut *="N95%0824/ajp traffic not generated within Starlight Ridge. All public streets are provided for anyone to use on whatever paths they select. H.Speeds were collected on the five (5) local collector streets shown on Exhibit 'A' location map. Table 'A' identifies each of the associated critical speeds (85th percentile) surveyed by direction. For an area with a residential prima facia speed limit of 25 MPH, our survey was disheartening. Since our data collection effort in 1994, both Police Department and Public Works have made an effort to reduce speeds on Cosmic Drive specifically. Staff has posted the residential speed limit of 25 MPH on Cosmic Drive and requested police enforcement. We. have recently located the Radar Trailer Display unit on Cosmic Drive to gage its effectiveness on speed when surveyed a week later. Police enforcement was asked to stay away from this area from July 21, 1995 so it would not influence results. Table 'B' shows the collision history for this area. ]III.Directional 24 hour volumes are also shown on Table 'A' for all roadways. All streets in this area indicate exceptional low volumes except Cosmic Drive. Ile 1,017 car per day on Cosmic Drive reflects about 15% below the 1,200 cars a day indicating acceptable roadway service levels. IV.Based on existing developments and the circulation element of the City's General Plan, the extension of Moraga Road from Rancho California Road to Mira Loma Drive is not in our future. The existing topograph would also be a major obstacles. As requested by Commissioner Guerriero, the City's Speed Undulation Policy is attached. Since the required traffic volumes are not reached for any of our subject streets, these roadways would not be eligible for implementation of speed undulations. Other factors such as roadway widths and grades could also disqualify these streets and have not been evaluated. Based on the reduction in speeds on Cosmic Drive over the past year, staff recommends implementing a program of consistent speed enforcement, a regular schedule of placing the City's Radar Trailer Display unit on all five (5) subject streets. We also recommend posting stop controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive. FISCAL @ACT: 2 - Stop Signs with Limit Lines 0$150'.00 each = $300.00 Attachments: Table "A' - Travel Flow Data Table 'B' - Collision History Exhibit 'A' - Location Map June 22, 1995 Public/Traffic Safety Agenda Report Memo from Ken Bruckman Speed Undulation Policy *@k95XOB24/ajp TAIRIX "All TRAVEL FLOW DATA STARLIGHT REDGE SUBDIVISION .LOCATION@@@@ @:@EKDAY,VOL CAL COUNTS @@@24 @Hour::Coijnts):@:@"@ .@@6/94@@ 8/95 ASTEROID WAY 358 Vehicles Northbound 140 Vehicles 40 MPH Southbound 218 Vehicles 36 MPH COSMIC DRIVE 1,017 Vehicles 38 MPH Northbound 486 Vehicles 33 MPH Southbound 531 Vehicles 32 MPH SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 778 Vehicles 33 MPH Northbound 377 Vehicles 38 MPH Southbound 401 Vehicles 36 MPH AGENA STREET 277 Vehicles Eastbound 138 Vehicles 43 MPH Westbound 139 Vehicles 31 MPH RN CROSS ROAD 533 Vehicles Eastbound 251 Vehicles 33 MPH Westbound 282 Vehicles 36 MPH TOTAL 2,963 Vehicles Average 35.8 MEPH r. \tmfric\commimn\agenda\95\tmffiow. @0824 /sip TABLE "B" COLI.JSION HISTORY STARLIGHT R]IDGE SUBDWEION 1993 1994 1995* AGENA.ST'REET 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 ASTEROID WAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 COSMIC DRIVE 0 1 1 0 0 0 SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 0 0 0 0 0 1 SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD 0 0 0 0 1 0 PDO INJURY PDO INJURY PDO INJURY 1-1-95 through 3-31-95 PDO - Property Damage Only CHURCIIILL @ON.Q DR MIL 1REMORA ST 2CAPRICE CT 3CANDIDA OR Al AL.PHA VIRGO CA ONDA CT CH 0 2 If @)<V4 IS LAN P RI MAVERA AGENDA REPORT TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:September 28, 1995 SUBJECT:Item 3 Starlight Ridge - Speed Reduction Efforts RECO ATION: Receive and file the project update.. BACKGROUND: 'Me subject of residential speed control has for years been a popular topic at many Public/Traffic Safety Commission meetings. In the past staff has relied upon the substantiation of trouble locations by first receiving community input and then collecting actual vehicle speed counts. In most areas the speed profile revealed a moderate speed profile (slightly more than 15% of vehicles traveling over 25 MPH), which required minimal attention. In the Starlight Ridge neighborhood our data revealed a different picture. Due to the elevated speed profile which grossly exceeded the speed limit, staff recommended, with Commission support, an accelerated police enforcement effort based on actual speed plot information fbr every 15 minute period of the day. This coupled with the implementation of the Radar Trailer Display Unit, has not satisfied the residents and/or the Commission. The very last direction from this Commission included the re- checking of 'Stop" sign warrants at locations that have already been found to be providing appropriate assigrunent of right-of-way. Further action was requested. This report contains three articles which describe procedures for elevated neighborhood speed controlling measures called traffic calming. These articles should provide enough information to open discussion on the possibility of using traffic calming techniques again in Temecula. Staff has plans to present the Commissions approved 'Street Closure/Modification' policy to City Council as the guidelines for processing those types of citizen request. 'Me proposed policy has all of the requirements needed to handle these issues now that the City has an adopted appeal process. Once the City Council provides staff with support of the new policy, we can begin the full scale community involvement needed to ensure success of any cooperative effort to reduce vehicular speeding. FISCAL IWACT: None Attachment: 1.I.T.E. Journal Article - Suburban Residential Traffic Calming (Sept. 1995) 2.I.T.E. Traffic Engineer Handbook - Transportation Functions of Streets 3.A.A.A. Neighborhood Traffic Management Programs 4.Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets \agm&\95\OM/aip .Suburban Residenfial Traffic Calming BY C. EDWARD WALTER calmine or slowing is frequently r,Ced to a.-s reverse traf6c engineer- ing. Instead of easing and speeding @c flow, traffic calming uses geometric chanl,es or desims that passively regulate travel speed. Europeans take traffic calming vern, seriously: In residential areas they tr@, for 20 miles per hour (mph) speeds to reduce injury severity. In commercial areas, where there are shared traffic zones between vehicles and pedestrians, they strive to achieve speeds of 10 mph to 15 mph. Traffic calming measures are Generally retrofitted onto existing streets. However, having once recognized the need for traffic calming, these ideas have led to new hierarchies of residential street classifications and n--- EnL desizn principles i land and Australia.' In the Washinszton, D.C.-Baltimore, Md., suburban areas, postwar residential development frequently was modeled along! the Columbia. Md., residential plan of long curvina residential streets with numerous cul-de-sacs. Theie nonlinear street plans have led to longer trip len@. At the same time these new resi- dential patterns were developing, local governments developed minimum design standards setting width, curvature and frec;uendv vertical izrades based on street C. Edward Walter is Chief of the Traffic Engi- neering Division .fo r Howard Counti-, Maryland He is a graduate of Cornell Universiti, and has a master's degree from MIT He is a Meniber ofITE. 44 - ITE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995 classification. in Howard County, to reduce speed in suburban residential Maryland, which hes between Baltimore communities. This article presents the and Washington, a 35 mph design speed results of that efforl was used for residential streets with a 30 ft to 36 ft roadway width. Frequently Vertical Alignment 2,4CO-ft to 3,@ft long cul-de-sw streets Modification were approved: it is little wonder that despite 25 mph speed limits, 85th per- Vertical changes to roadwav geome- centile speeds of 38 mph to 40 mph are try offer guaranteed speed reduction.' routine in such residential areas. Speed humps, developed in England and Residential speeding is a major com- sometimes referred to as "insomniac mu@ concern. Speeding has become a policemen," control speed by adjusting wav of life for many-, although residents the i2eight and spacing of the hump. They may pass their own property within the introduce a vertical acceleration factor to speed limit, they have no hesitation 'in the vehicle. The Watt's Profile Speed zipping past their neighbors' property as Hump, as developed in England, is a poT- fast as possible. Police with limited tion of a 12 ft4ong cylinder rising 3 inches resources undertake periodic enforce- (in) in height (see Figure 1). In 1990, t ment on request, but such enforcemen Howard County placed seven of these efforts are sporty at best. These situations humps on Baltimore Avenue near have given rise to the development and Laurel, Md. The 85th percentile speed success of traffic calming measures in existing residential neighborhoods. Traffic engineers in the metropolitan counties surrounding Baltimore and Washington have formed the Marviand Traffic Engineers Council to solve joint problems. Several of the jurisdicuons have been working with community groups on traffic calming measures. In 1992, the council formed a traffic calming sub- COMMiEtee to share information on Aays SPEED SPEED NUMP SUMP RELATIVE DirrEqrNcr BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL WEED SUMPS -NO ME- SPEED HU.P$. SIG.E.T 01 C.CLL WAT?S TYPE HUMP CROSS SEC'Not FLAT TOP, HUMP CROSS SECTION Figure 1. Speed hump. NO. -OUNTABLE- Cu$16 a GUTTER CURS &CUTTER 00 OR D a -Ir-C. Figure 2. Traffic circle. before placement was 38 mph and the speed limit 25 mph. Immediatel%, aftervard (and continuing to the present day), 85th percentile speeds. were 27 mph to 29 mph between humps and 15 mph at each hump. The series of humps replaced two multi- wav stops and had the concurrence of 75 percent of residents. -nere have been no accidents in the four vears since the humps were placed vs. four accidents in the two vears immediately before hump construction. A vear later Howard Countv placed four humps on Dogwood Drive, a narrow residential street between two art@- aJ roadwavs. The 85th percentile speed before construction of the humps was 40 mph: after construction. it dropped to 28 mph. There also has been a 24 percent reduction in traffic volumes on DoLywood Drive as vehicles diverted to other routes. The Watt's Profile Speed Hump frequently has been limited in its application to roadwavs with 3.000 vehicles per dav (vpd) or fewer. although Dallas permits its use on streets handling up Eg 'ty$'ICAL SIGNAGE Figure 3. Roundabout. 46 - ITE JOURNAL - SEPTEMBER 1995 to 8.000 vpd.3 A flat top speed hump7@-ft long with a center 10-ft flat section was pioneered in the United States b%, Seminole Count),, Florida.' where it has been used on collector roads with more than I2.000 vpd. In Enciand. flat top humps are used on coi- iector roads and also frequently serve as pedestrian crossings. Two flat top humps were installed in 1993 on Shaker Drive in Howard Countv. where the 85th percentile speed was reduced from 43 mph to 29 mph. Remarkabiv. the speed between humps a nd at humps are essentially the same. (Seminole Counrv found similar operating experience.) 'rhis characteristic has led to its adoption in Howard Counrv as the preferred hump desil-n. The Cirv of College Park. Md.. reccntiv completed construction of four @ pedesmw crossings as part of a road rehabilitation. The cross section is s@ar to a flat top speed hump with a -'--in rise. The cirv added visual impact to the crossings b%, constructing the flat top portion with concrete and bnck. The Institute of Transportation Engineers has published a pro- posed recommended practice on speed humps. It was prepared bv the T@cal Council Speed Humps Task Force. which is current'- ly evaluating comments before a @ decision on adoption.5 Horizontal Alignme I nt Changes Tr2ffic Circles 2nd Roundabouts The City of Seattle, Wash., pioneered the L:.S. concept of Ailing small mffic circles in existing intersections to slow traffic through residential areas. From a small beginning in 1978, Seattle has now constructed more than 800 traffic circles on residential streets.* Their pioneering experience has been adopted elsewhere, including suburban Maryland counties. Traffic circles have been installed in @land as both temporary and permanent instaba- tions. Some of @ temporary insta.Uatir-ns have been redesigned as permanent ones and some have been removed at the request of residents. Anne Arundel and Montgomery counties have each instadied several circles (see Fieure 2). The success of @c circles in reducing residential travel speeds is related to the amount of horizontal deflection required as a vehi- cle moves around the circle.'Both Anne Arundel and Montgomery counties have desiened considerable deflection in their circles, effectively prohibiting intersection traffic from traveling more than 18 mph to 20 mph. Operationally. side roads stop for traffic on the main route. Most left-tuming cars will make a 270-degree turn arotmd the circle. Some of the circles have been constructed with a mountable curb and 4 ft concrete ring to accommodate trucks. How ever. large trucks cannot operate within the turning radius of the circles and therefore make left turns in front of the circle. This could be considered a dangerous practice except volumes are lo%%, and the circles are desiened with good visibility,. Because of the problem of trucks tumine in front of the circles. Prince Georges County has constructed several roundabouts. Roundabouts are similar to traffic circles but have splitter islands that effectively prevent trucks from turning in front of the circle., Generaliv the islands are formed with concrete or asphalt curb. but occasionally they are painted (see Figure 3). Operationaliv. traffic entering a roundabout vields to traffic in the circle. and there is no major roadiminor'road consideration as at normal intersections. Roundabouts larpe enough to accommodate trucks mus t have a total inscribed di-ameter -of approximately 100 feet (ft). This is frequently difficult to achieve in residential intersec- tions without acquiring additional riizht-of-wav. Both roundabouts and traffic circles are ver-v effective as inter- section traffic calmino devices. Thev have been' used with consid- crable success in Monteomer%- Co'unt%, for isolated intersection caiming, where 85th percentile speeds have been reduced from more than 40 mph to 20-21- mph. Alone a residential route thev must be repeated at reeular intervals to maintain "calm- traffic speeds throughout. Circles have also been constructed between intersections to calm traffic. Roadway Restrictions Roadwav restrictions can also be effective traffic calming devices. Ma'nv residential streets are considerably wider than required. On such streets. cars parked opposite each other in mid- block act as a temporary roadwav restriction. @ phenomenon can be created bv consuucnng pedestrian peninsulas at intersec- tions or chokers at mid-block (see Figure 4). The pavement width between chokers can be built for one traffic lane or two. Ukewise the resenction can'be either parallel to the travel way or twisted to the direction of travel (see Figure 5. next page). Downtown Market Street in York. Pa.. is an excellent example of a one-wav street narrowed to two lanes with a twist introduced at each end of a long block in order to reduce travel speeds. Medians also can be used for road narrowings. Medians 20 ft to 50 ft or more in length have been constructed in Anne Arundet Counrv in advance of intersections. Roadway widths each side of the medians are 11 fL However, unless cars regularly park along the street, median consuuction by itself does little to ;@uce traffic speed. To compensate for this. Anne Arundel County is construct- ing small bulb-outs (peninsula projections into the roadway) to force drivers to make a lateral deflection as they approach and enter median-calmed area. Studies indicate that islands have reduced 85th percentile speeds bv 2 mph to 5 mph. Islands without lateral deflection have the least speed reduction. 30 36' -EA 0 L"TABLE CURS MAISEO REFLECTI@E ft@EME.T ..RKERS VVhere are your high accident locations? Intersection MagicO @arL- can ta you that, plus: Customized collision diagrams Charts on Time of Day, DUI, Type of collision, etc. Any user criteria! Frequency reports, accident lists, custom reports, etc. GIS compafible output A V' MS Windows- compatible ramming For informaton, contact Pd' Programming. Inc., or ask your current consulting engineer about Intersection MagicO. Quesfions may also be directed to H@ & CrobiN Mc These Los Ang@es area consulfing traffic engineers have teamed up with Pd' Programming. Inc. Working togetw, we can help you wnh all your traffic engineering needs. U14) 731-9455 V4c@TiT*M on got*) JEEFE I.00 L Figure 4. Parallel choker. A variation on roadway restrictions has been constructed at two Prince Georges County intersections. where offset small medians force vehicles to go through a lateral deflection in one direction of travel only. In the next block a similar median forces siniiiar deflection for the other direction of traffic. Both Anne Arundel and Howard counties have painted ITE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995 - 47 '30 - 36' WHITE VPAVEMENT MADKING Iz .01\ u z z lw Z 4 8D Figure Twisted choker. ICE WARNING SYSTEM *IC A tool for the road rhaintenance services The 4 EDS components: Active pavement sensor Roadside weather station Data acquisition software Pagers 0Precise determination of the freezing temperature 0Reliable determination of the road surface condition using a single transducer 0Continuous prediction of the time of ice formation 0Direct road surface information and alarm transmission through wireless pagers @br eter USA VIBRO-METER Corp. 489 Devon Park Drive # 310 Wayne, PA 19087 - Phone: (610) 688 3700 Fax: (610).688 3714 48 iTE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995 parkine lane lines without cenleriine stripine on residential streets. This visual]%- narroa,s the available roadA-a%, and has r esultcd in reductions of 3 mph to 4 mph in vehicle travel. This narrowing can be reinforced with several pedestrian peninsulas and speed humps. Such combinations of traffic calmine mea- sures are used extenstvei%, in Europe to achieve desires speed reductions. Traffic Calming Criteria Tentative criteria have been developed 2overninE! the instal- iation of traffic calminp devices. Roadwavs considered tor trai- fic calmin must be p=ariiv residential StTeeES A'ith a majontn of residential homes and driveways frontinp on the street. Existing 85th percentile speeds mus t be 10 mph or more above the speed limit and there must be 1.000 vpd or more usine the residential street. Each of the metropolitan jurisdictions stud@- traffic calmin2 measures after neighborhood complaints. The\- then work wi@h the community to quaneifv and define the r)rob- lem. and specific recommendations are made to the communit\-. Marviand has found resident acceptance is paramount. and is best facilitated by workin2 with a traffic committee from the community. which can then sell the project to the communit,%, at laree. Howard Countv requires 60 percent of residents to approve recommendations by petition before construction. Conclusions Traffic calming can be an effective means of reducing speeds in established residential neighborhoods. Speeding generally occurs alone the entire length of a streCL may extend over sev- erai streets. and requires the regular repetition of traffic @ng measures. The specific measures to be used for =ffic calming are determined bv roadwav characteristics. cost restraints and resident acceptance. Speed reductions ranong from 3 mph to 24 mph have been obtained depending on the specific traffic cairriinp- devices utilized. ResEular repetition of calming devices at 400 @ to 600 ft intervals is required to maintain slower speeds along the leneeh of a street. References 1.Green Street Joint Venture. Australian Model Code for Residential Development. Canberra. Australia: Department of lndustr-%,. Technology and Commerce. No%,. 1990. 2.Devon CouniN, Council. Traffic Calming Giiidelines. Great Britain: Devon Count-,, Council. 1991. pp. 2&-31. of Dallas. Department of Transportation. Road Hiimp 3. Cit. Design. Dallas. Texas: Citv of Dallas. Department of Transportation. P. 2. 4.Nicodemus. David A. -Safe and Effective Roadwav Humps. The Seminole Countv Profile.- ITE Con?penditim'of Technical Papers. Washineton. D.C.: Institute of Transportation Entincers. 1991.pp.102-105. 5.Institutc of Transportation Enstineers. Gititieliiie.@ for the Design (and Application of Speed Hitnips. A Proliosed Recomniended Practice. Washineion. D.C.: institute of Transportation Eneincers. March 1993. 6.Todd. Kenneth. "A Histor%- of Roundabouts in the United Statcs and France." Traiisi)(;rtatioti Qjiarteri.i- 2(4). Oct. 19F8. p. 61 1. 7-Austroads. Gitide tip Traffic Eirgiiieeritiiz Practicc. Roioijdahoitis. S%-dne%. Australia: Austroads. 1993. pp. 19-'-7. 8-Austr'oad!,. Cifide to Tra.fric Eiigi)jccritig Practice. Roiii2dabojizs. Svdnev. Australia: Austroads. 1993. pp. 4.Conflict between the public aeencies that manage and maintain streets and protect neighborhoods (such as pub- lic works. police. and fire services) and the neighbors. 3.Conflicts among the professionals who plan. design. and manage streets. chiefiv between engineers and designers. Transportation functions of streets Streets perform two transportation functions: provision of access to individual parcels of land and provision of an infrastructure for moi,ement between various origins and destinations. "Access' can be interpreted to include the existence of driveways connecting the street with private propertv and the availability of parts of the street for parking and loading. "Movcmen t- comprises both the capaciii- to move quanti- ties of vehicles or people and the abilitv to do so at a reason- abiv high speed. Although residents frequently perceive access as a func- tion that primarily serves those within the neighborhood and movement as one that primarily serves those outside the neighborhood. in actuality both functions are necessary to - both classes of users. since travel (movement) invariably in- volves departure and arrival (access) from an origin and to a destination. Design standards. Agencies in many nations and states have developed design standards for streets. Such standards generally emphasize safe and efficient vehicle operation but mav be silent on the relationship of street use to abutting land developments and its users: it general lv is assumed that other regulations (such as zoning and building codes) will address these concerns. Thus. although thev mav make provision for minimizing vehicle conflicts and vehicle-pedestrian con- flicts (e.g., offset intersections, continuous sidewalks, etc.), the standards in current use in manv jurisdictions do not ef- fectiveiv address the potential for conflicts between needs for residential access and amenities and the needs for traffic movement into and bevond a given neighborhood. Manv neighborhoods also predate current standards. and their streets mav have other design problems. such as inade- quate drivewav spacing, limited setback and space for off- street parking, a "grid" pattern of streets that facilitates the incursion of through traffic and that mav result in vehicular conflicts and speeds that are unsuitable for the neighborhood. Another concern is that design standards usualiv arc ap- plied at the level of a subdivision or local jurisdiction. at least in the United States. There are man%- cases in which adjacent jurisdic,lons fail to coordinate their networks. and streets ,-,range designation and -haracter as thev cross urisdictional boundaries. Residential traffic controls. Local residential streets should be protected from through traffic. Residential 356 @-ra'ti-- @-r.@ineerirg.-ianC:ZOOK streets should be linked to traffic-carr-,Itng streets in a %4-a% that simultaneously provides good access to other parts Of the community and minimizes the chance of the residential streets' use bv through traffic. These goals should be a part of the planning for new residential areas. In some communi- ties. these objectives have been achieved in older neighbor- hoods (in Monteomerv Countv. Marviand: Berkeiev and Richmond in California: Seattle. Washineton: and othe- locations) through the installation of traffic diverters and barriers. Residential streets should also be protected from vehic- ular traffic moving at excessive speed (greater than 25 to 30 mpb) and from parking unrelated to residential activi- ties. Figure 1 1-8 illustrates several types of treatments that are designed to reduce speed and discourage through traf- Fic at minor intersections in residential areas. A varietv of treatments has been devised to accomplish the above o'ojectives-ranging from speed 'hump5' and -chok- ers' for speed control to the Dutch 'Woonerf - concept. which Figure 114. Treatment of minor intersections in residcn- tiaj areas to reduce speed and discourage through traff ic. SOURCE: W-S. HomBUItGER AND J.H. KELL. Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering. [2th edition. Universitv of Califor- nia. Institute of Transportation Studies. Berkeley, 1988, p. '-)O-7. r--, c D L__-I-. tLJ 41 E F I ------ R5-1 ARTE R.AL. STPU- -% ARTERIAL STREET S,Q,@ R3.3 essentially convert neighborhood blocks nto pedestrian- oriented precincts. Speed -humps' are carefuliv designed undulations in the pavement surface that have been shown to control speed cf- fCCEiVCIV without the risk of interfering with the driver's control of the vehicle. These humps are EVPiC211V installed across the width of the roadway, with a longitudinal circular section 3 to 4 in in height and approximately 12 ft in length. These should be distinguished from speed bumps. which are much shorter (6 to 12 in long) and which have been associ- ated with maintenance. safetv' and liability concerns. A studv of the use of speed humps;' recommended that the pavement Undulations should be used oniv under the following conditions: I .'he street serves a pur.-Iv local access function. 2.There is no more than one lane per direction. 3 .The street is not a transit or truck route. 4.The street is not zoned above 25 mph. 5.The 85th percentile speed exceeds 30 mph. 6.There is evidence of a speed-related accident problem. Undulations should be located no less than 200 ft from an intersection or sharp horizontal curve. and each undula- tion should be visible for at least 200 ft. Standard warning signs (e.g.. Sign Wg in the MUTCD) should be used. The use of pavement stripes has also been suggested.52 but these might give the appearance of crosswalks, which could mis- lead motorists. 'Chokers' may consist of landscaped bulbs between the sidewalk- and the strect, widened sidewalk ar@, or points street entrances are necked down. Raised or brick crosswalks may also be used in combination with pavemeit undulations. In addition to numerous applications of these devices in European and Australian cities. speed humps have been used extensively in Pasadena, California. The Woonerf requires motorized traffic and bicvcle traf- Fic to adapt to pedestrian behavior, and it has become verv popular in European countries. Extensive installations and utilitv reioration are required, and initial costs and mainte- rianc.- costs mav be high. Modified forms of this type of control have been implemented in Boulder, Colorado; San Francisco, and other United States cities. ,Neighborhood parking permit programs. to limit long- term parking to those living in the area. have also been imple- merited in a number of North-American cities and upheld bv court decisions. These usuallv involve standard time-limit parkinc, for the general public (1, 2. or 4 hours) with exe.-np- tion for vehicles displaying a permit available oniv to resi- dents. The parking restrictions mav aiso exclude vehicles with no permit at certain hours of the dav. Other traffic controls frequently requested bv residents i.iclude stop signs, speed limits, turn prohibitions, and one- -aN, street designations. In general. the application of -nese de%-icts ma%. be expeced to ha,,,t the.same effects In Tinca and others. Siincomr77ittee.ReLn-:,?,. P--@ eme?7r L?iciiiiz;- Rnad Rc:)ort to the Caiifornia Traffic Controi Devicts Con. No,emoc, 1983, Burton w Steonens.-RoadHumpsfortheControiofvchicularSciecds a,id T.@at'fic Flo--- Put)ii@ R,)aaj. ;O.! Dece-nber 986;. 3'--90. residential neighborhoods as the%. do -Ise%%ne,:. arc indiscriminate use should be avoided. Stop signs are pt tentiv requested bv citizens %vith the expectation tna,, will control speeds or reduce traffic volumes and accic in residential neighborhoods. Although hcrt 'De s effect on volume and accidents in certain instances. is little evidence ot'.-ffect on traffic speeds attributed" stop sign placement except within about -'OO ft of the i section controlled. Some cities use special war,-ants reduced minimum volume requirements for resid-, neighborhood locations. Nlost residential streets are covered b,.., -blankc.,- s: limits of '-5 or 30 mph. though it is not uncommon I . or percentile speed of traffic to be considerably higher. par lariv on collector streets. In such c:@s. signs mcr-,Iv re- drivers of tne general limits applicable to tne residen tiai unless an overriding problem indicates the need to estab! new speed zone on the street. Studies CvaiUaEing tne c of speed limit sigas on speed have been large!,,. confine major streets and have generally shown that signs have little impact on driver speed on major streets. Drivers sistentiv drive at speeds which thev perceive as reason. comfortable. convenient. and safe under existing condit: rcwdless of posted speed limils. Consistent enforce- is essential to obtain anv measurable effect from postir speed limits. Alternatives to speed zoning include paver LLndulations (described above), traffic circles (discussec low), and podium intersections. where the entire interse-, is raised a few inches above the normal grade level with ra to conform to the grades of the adjacent streets. Turn prohibitions and one-wav streets can have a ver-, nificant effect on traffic volumes. if their use is %cc.-,tze, the affected drivers. Enforcement is essential. particu;. when the regulations are first enacted. These measurC5 low-cost alternatives, and thev provide minimum imped-. to 'emergency vehicles, which can travel the 'wrong v when necessary. Speeds tend to be higher on one-wav str! In residential neighborhoods. this can be counteracted iimiting the number of blocks with one-wav continuity. wav streets tend to be inherently safer than two- . wav sTx: but in residential neighborhoods, where irreguliir patter-, one-wav streets are used, careful treatment is essential a tersections. Traffic circles tend to have higher violation i and may represent a risk for increased accidents becau: the tendencv of some motorists to violate the one-way tem. especially in making left turns. Other re-,ulatorv devices. - such as traff-ic signals. signs. truck restriction signs, and access regulation signs -.4ot Enter,- -Not a Thru Street,- "Dead End.' -Local Ac Oniv.- and 'Thr-u 'Vehicles Prohibited'), have also been I in residenT:Lai settings. The latter signs are used primaril conjunction with one-wav streets (i.e.. 'Do Not Enter') informational signs, although the use of 'Local Access 0 signs in the reguiator%l black-on-white format could conc abin- be ci'4'--ctive in reducing traffic volume on reside: streets it accompanied bv enforcement. Warning signs in residential neighborhoods have firr. uses. and drl%,ers and pedestrians usuall%l need to be wa; oriiv of special hazards. The attention ofthe driver is dra'A the location of schools (especially elementary schools) playgrounds. to pavement undulations. to the fact that tr. 7raff@c.-I--gulaticr-s carriers or diver--,rs are located ahead. and to stop and %'cid slizns ahead if thev ma% not be readii,.- .-isible because of curves or shrubber%. 'SioA-- siens. -Children at Pla% - signs. and noveiz%l siens are vas!uc and unenforceable. Th.- result maN-. therefore. have little more than a placebo effect on resi- dents. The no%,-.It%- of a neA- slan wears off quicki%- and then no lonper attracts the attention of reizular passers-b%-. Nonstan- @@ard sizns usuall@. have no legal meaning or established prece- dent: their us,- is discouraged because of both the lack of proven effectiveness and undesirable iiabilitv exposure. Fur- rher, driver respect for signs and other traffic controls ma%- be eroded through the use of nonstandard and unneeded dev ices. Geometric design features. Geometric design features M'a%- be used to restrict access and/or reduce speeds in resi- den tial settings. These include median barriers and cul-dc- sacs at intersections with major streets. and semi-diverters. diaponal diverters. and midblock cul-de-sacs on local resi- dentiai streets. Some of these design features are also illus- - ,rated n Figure 11-8. These are features that phvsicaliv and prevent vehicle movement as well as reduce speed. Their common characteristic is that bv their phvsical form thev force or prohibit a specific action. Geometric fea- tures have the advantage of being largeiv self-enforcing and of creating a visual impression that a street is not intended for through traffic. The disadvantages relative to other devices are their cost. the potentially negative impact on emergency and service vehicles. and the imposition of inconvenient ac- c-@s on some parts of a nciehborhood. Thev are also static and must be appropriate at all hours of the dav and night. Rumble strips, formed with patterned sections of rough pavement or raised pavement markers, have no effect on traffic volumes and little on speed though thev do appear to cause an increase in driver attention. Studies conducted on major streets show that the strips have had a noticeable ef- fe,-t ,-i reducing accidents when placed in advance of a stop star.. Effects in lo-er-speed residential areas have not been determined. Introducing curvatures on a previously straight alignmeni has been discussed as a phvsical speed control device, but this has produced considerable public controversy and warnings of possible associated safetv problems. Use of various designs in Australia is reported to have a %,er%, subtle effect on driver behavior. %"aile,,- zutters and roueh pavements are two existing devices that tend to control traffic as an unintended bv- product of their presence. In neither case can it be suggested that streets should be desizned to include vallev gutters and rouzh pavement in order to reduce speed: however. the effe-.-, mav be an argument for dc]an' ling repaving of pureiv residential streets-an argument that should be carefull@ -eiizhed ap-ainst an%- noted indications of a hazardous o r ciettricratine structural condition. :','ay streets and orivat=- slieeis Bo:- :)ia% streets and private streets are common in some areas oF,, it L:-iiied States. Traffic flow ma%- be restricted on such streets z,,irouph the use oftemporarv oarricades. si ns. or 2ates. Such streets can be iemporaril% closed during cer- 'La:in hours. and permanent closure ma% also be considered 358 "a.-ICt:COK in areas A-here v@ icular access to homes and szaraecs is pro- %-ided for b%- alternate means such as allevs. - In lv'ancou,, -c,-. - British Columbia. a number of blocks have been closed to vehicular traffic and converted to exclusive use b%l pedestri- ans. c%-ciists. strollers. and-in one case-an outdoor cafc. Residents must park their vehicles on a cross street or alie% or-wherc 3,.,ailabic-in off-street spaces. Provision I - or emergency, vehicle entr%- into these blocks is provided b%- use of traversable barriers in some. . out not all. cases. Imolementina neighborhood Lra,'TIC controls The wa,, in which neighborhood traffic controls are im- plemented can be as important to their eventual success or failure as the substance of the strategies themselves. Impic- mentation should be considered not as a step but as a process requiring careful planning and documentation. public notice, evaluation. and possibiv refinement of the strategies. Such a a process calls for the same ttcnilon to detail and for the same thorough consideration as the initial planning -ffor-E. The implementation of neighborhood traffic control schemes mav raise issues about the responsible j urisdiction's legal authority to take such actions. For example, the mea- sures or devices used to effectuate traffic control mav be sub- ject to state requirements as to design and/or application. Legal questions mav also be raised about restrictions of ac- -cess caused bv the plan. its environmental impact, or con- cerns for tort liability. It is bevond the scope of this chapter to report or advise on the legal requirements of various United States states or foreign jurisdictions. However. legal counsel is usuallv advisable in developing and implementing neigh- borhood traffic control strategies. Even when there is no question of authority, compliance with standards. or other legal requirements. neighborhood traffic control actions are sometimes challenged bv opponents on grounds of denial of access or discrimination against non- residents. In general. challenges to other-wise authorized traf- fic control schemes on the grounds that thev cause incidental inconvenience to some parties are fikeiv to fail; a comrnunitv mav divert traffic and partially restrict accm but still suc- cessfullv withstand a legal challenge. Tests of sufficient police power and reasonable exercise of such power must stfll be met, of course. Evaluating the impact of neighborhood traffic controls Evaluation of technical performance and community perc@ tions is needed to provide a reasonable basis for decisions to keep or abandon a plan- A formal evaluation can clarifv is- sues. brinz the more stabilized long-term performance char- acteristics into focus. and spotlight hidden gains and losses that mav be significant. F:valuation can point to opportuni- ties for modifvins! a traffic control plan to make it perform its intended function better or to lessen adverse impacts. It can also be used to determine whether the plan should be ex- panded both in terms of devices and geographical area. Finall,,,. evaluation can advance the state ofknowledpe about neighborhood traf, -ic control and identifv problems that might be avoided in future applications. Effectiveness of controls. An evaluation should start Highwav Research Board. Ht:7n.cL F,,g. '4ational Cjopc,.2ii,c H,eM.a, with this question: Do the controls fulfill their intended pur- Research Project Report 95. Washington, DC. 1,1-0 poses' Some effects are easilv evaluated through a -before- HOFF. G C...4 CPmpartiort oei@.een Seiecied Chicago Area Expresswav Surveillance Protect Report Illinois 0-@ -- after' traffic studv. Other intended purposes involving public Chicago. 1969. sion of High-avs. perceptions and reactions are best evaluated with public in- HO.%tgLiRGER. W. S.. @ZABETH A. DEkKill P--Tflt C. @EL.%IA.".N, DA.,.IF.L 7 put. Evaluation should go bevond the question of effective- SM[Tlq. JR.. lk.'id BE)t@- BEUKERS. Resiaeprijai Street Detic,@ and ness in fulfilling the plan's primarv intentions. however. In Comirot. JnsEitutc of Transportation Engineers. Eigic-ooti C:ii,@s. N; particular, anv negative impacts of the plan as implemented Prenticc Hall. 1989. should be identified. Technical staff can then follow up on Ho.-4avRrEx WS.. AND I..Ii KELL F:intiamentais ,t TrOfftL EaRjnee,,,fc. 12th Edition. Unavc,-saiv of California. institute of Transportattun such matters (e.g., increased emergency response time) so as Studies. Bcrkelev. 1988. . to develop modifications to offset negative effects. Involve- ITE Technical Council Committee -IA--k. -Yici@' Sien L;saitc ind -Xr)plico- ment of emergency and service personnel can also help to tions.- Transportation Engineering, 43(i 0). (oc-occr i -913). 3-, mini@ze such adverse effects. JOHNSON. P-. Ar4t) B.,'AcKjp4LEY. unpublished paper udrnitte@. o Tec-inicai iminor adjustments to a neighborhood plan are -a common .kw2rd Committce.,\,Iissouri Vtdliv Section. institute or Transportation occurrence. Observation during the period immediately fol- Engineers. 197 1. lowing implementation is critical in order to identify prob- 'VIAYEFL P. A.. -one-wav Street$.- Traffic Conirni Lrt7,t Roaa.,a,. @,enen:, - lems that could casiiv be eliminated bv minor adjustments. Their Relationship to HirrtK-ai- Saieti,. Hign-a@ Lscrs Federation :or Saicty,2nd.'Aobiiitv, Washington. DC. i9'1. C.'-iap. 10. Additional police surveillance also helps discourage erratic 'vlichipn DeP2rtrneni of State High-avs. Tiie -@coromfc anj or illegal driving befiavior and vandalism. tEffectrof0me-@iivSirrrisinResiaenitai,4reas Lansing. 1969 National Committee on Uniform Traffic Ljws and Ordinances. L',?tio,- 'vlaintenance and enforcement issues. -Maintenai3ce and Veiytcie Coaeand.Vfodel 7rqlfic Ordinance. Evanston. IL. :087 enforcement are important to the continued effectiveness. of .141ELSEN. E.. -Experience from 10 Yc2rs Fignt against Traffic Congestion.- the traffic control scheme and to continued public accept- 36tti International Congress. International Union ofpublic Transport. anc.-. While the pbvsical maintenance of the plan probabi,, Brussels. Scigium. 196-4. p. I 5. -ill require the greater amount of attention, in a broader Roads and Transportation Association of Canada. tfanual Lt'Geomeerrc sense, maintenance also requires attention to the need for con- Desi!rn Standardsfor Canadian Roads. Ottawa. Ontario, I 996. tinued driver respect and public support. It may be accessary Smoo,F. R. T- -Traffic Signs.' lmproed Street C'tili:ation through Tra]Tic En- j ineertng,. Highway Research Board Special Report 93, Washington. DC. to remind police officials of the need for enforcement, or to )Iiv 1967. ask them to do 'focused enforcement' in arm that appear SlEc;i-;RT. A.. 'Speed Limit Irks Germans.- Chicago Tribune. October I 1. to have a high violation rate. 1 ?7 1. Sec. I -A. p. 3. Si%mqus. HER@. Veighborhood Traffic Controls. paper presented at the 2 5th Annual Meeting, Western Section. Institute o(Traff-ic Engineers. Berkeley, CA. July 19-,2. CES FOR FURT= ING STEpi tERs. Buit@ W.. -Road Humps for the Control of Vehicular Speeds at d Traffic Flow.' Public Aoadr. 50. (December 1986). 82-90. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofrici@, A TAt4C k WAY.@ AND OTHER& Subcommittee Report on Pavement t,@'ndula- Poilcv on Geometric Design ofhighwavs and Streets. Washington DC. iii,ns (AoadBumps). Report to the California.TraLfFic Control Devices 1990. pp. I 63. 2 I 2. C,)mmittec, November 1983. U.S. I Department of Transportation. Wanual opt C'ni.form Traffic Control American Association of State Highwav and Transportation Officials. D,,Ytces. Washington. DC. 1989. .Vanual ]or @Waintenance and Inrpectlo)7 of Bridges. Wast3i ngton. DC. 1 974. U.S. I)epanment of Traz:sportition. Federal Highway Administration. .4 APPLEYARR). DoNALD.A,4DMARK Li@ 'The Environmental Quality of Bi kewa v Criteria Digesi. Washington. DC. 19 77. Citv Streets: The Residents'Viewpoint.-Journal oftheamerican Inrr,- U.S. Department oftransportation. Federal Highway Administration. De- rule of?ianners. 38 (March 1972). pp. 84-101. sijnandConstructionCriteriaforSikewavConsiructzonProjeczs.,Noticc of- Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register. 45. (I 5 1), Washington. DC. Automobile Club ofsouthcrn C@iiornia. Realistic Speed Zoning', ;Vhy and August 4, 1980. Ho-. Los Angeles. 1976, p. 8. L;.S. I)cpar-Emcni of Transportation. Fcdcr2i Highway Administration. BRL:C,-J. A-. -One-Wav,'Aajor Arterial Streets.- lmprovedstreet C'tili:ollon Hirhway Statistics Summary to 1975. pp. 85-96. Highwa%- Statistics rnrougn Traj)ric Engineering, Highway Research Board Special Report Su 7?mary to 198i. pp. 257-'260. and High-av Statistics Summarv to 9 3. Washington. DC. ;,4av 196 i. 19,t6. pp. 176-178. Washington. DC. California Department of.\Iotor vehicles. P@iticie Code.,Sacramcnto. 1996. [;.S. D!partment oftransportatiou. Federal Highway Administration. Plan- California Department of Transportation. Caii.fornia Rideshartng Faciii- ninr and Design Critertoji7r Bike%-avs tri.Caiifornia. Washington. DC. ;ies. Sacramento, lanuarv 1984. 19"9. 'zabiisning, CriierzaforSpeedLtmiis in Sci2oct Zones. Engineering Expcr. U.S. Di par-tment oftranspor-tation. Transportation Svstems Center, Priority iment Station. West Virginia Liniversit@.. 196-,. Ter niiiques for High Occ.-ipancv Vehicles -State of the .-irr Overview'. GILLARD, Q. -Los Angeles Diamond Lancs Freewav Experiment.- Traffic Wa;htngton, DC. -Novemocr 1975. Quarierit. ENO Foundation for Transportation. Westport. CT. April ! 918. HABIB, F) A AND OTHERS..4naivsls o -fPedestria)7 Cross-ai;z Saiert- on One. I",J@ tree: Report DOT-OS--00;7. L;,S. Department of ransr)or',aijon. Washington. DC. September 1978. 7ra.4fic Reguiaticris 359 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MA NA CEMENT PROGRAMS With increasing frequency, cities and counties are turning to neigh- borhood traffic management as a means of responding to citizen concerns about traffic problems in residential areas. Often, these concerns are prompted by the presence of non-local traffic in residential areas, a condition that almost always signals the presence of difficulties on the arterial or collector roadway network. These problems should be addressed, wherever possible, prior to the implementation of more restrictive controls. Neighborhood traffic management programs can be v controversial. As a result, they require careful planning, comprehensive study and thorough debate before implementation is attempted. The planning process should include these basic steps and involve public participation throughout: Problem Identification - An exploration of the specific nature of the problem or problems, and the issues and individuals involved. Alternative Plans Generation - Definition of the full range of plausible responses to the identified problems. Plar, Selection - Predicting the likely effects of each alternative and choos- ing an option which has the most acceptable balance of positive and negative impacts. lmplement2tion - Preparing the public for what is to take place, then actually constructing or putting into effect the planned traffic control changes. Evaluation - Observing and measuring how the traffic man- agement sy stem actually operates and identifying features requiring change or fine tuning. modification - Adjustments to correct functional difficulties or to improve upon the initial planning concept or a larg@r-scale re- consideration of alternatives-a recycling of the planning proces@ where the initial scheme has proven unacceptable or ineffective. Traffic diversion is perhaps the most divisive of all neighborhood traffic management stategies. As -such, it requires the greatest thought and considera- tion. As an aid to the decision-making process, the advantages and disad- vantages of traffic diversion are listed in Appendix C. APPENDIX C ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC DIVERSION PROGRAMS Advantages: I -Improvements to a small area could be an incentive for families with children to move back into the area. 2.Diversion can help keep the occasional high-speed vehicle from using primarily residential, local streets as thoroughfares. 3.Selective street closures and the use of cul-de-sacs can provide additional green space, play areas, pedestrian malls, or parking area-; for residents or businesses. 4.Closing streets or diverting vehicle traffic may foster a stronger sense of neighborhood or community identity. 5.Diversion may foster increased neighborhood activity and, coupled with the lack of easy vehicle access and escape, help to reduce crime. 6.Within an affected area, traffic diversion may reduce noise, air pollution and vibration, and may make the streets safer for children and other pedestrians. 7.Controlling traffic can act as a catalyst that spurs neighborhood revitalization. 8.Improvements in the public streetscape could provide an impetus for the rehabilitation of private property. .9.Selective street closures, cul-de-sacs and directional controls at LElocal and arterial street intersections can reduce access conflicts thereby improving traffic flow and5afety on arterial streets. ra Disadvantages: m 1.Residents on streets in the vicinity of vehicle diverters may experience LAhigher levels of traffic volume and associated environmental and safety impacts. Im 2.Diversion may give children or other residents a false sense of protec- tion from motor vehicles. 3.Some cities have found that cul-de-sacs may heighten racial segregation; closed-off, tightly knit streets may discourage minority families from moving in. 4.Traffic diverted from residential streets may exceed the capacity of adjacent arterial and collector streets and require their upgrading or improvement. 5.Diverter installation (barriers, signs, islands and pavement markings would require additional maintenance. 6.Additional right-of-way acquisition may be necessary for both the target and alternative streets; for instance, diagonal diverters and cul-de-sac construction could be restrained by insufficient existing rights-of-way. 7.Diversion may result in access problems and may incon- venience residents and visitors on the affected streets and in the vicinity of the diverters. 8.Access for police, fire and other emergency vehicles may be hampered and response times may increase unless adequate provisions are made to ensure passage for such vehicles. 9.The implemertation of traffic restrictions without providing reasonable options for traffic circulation may generate negative reactions from both internal and external sources. 10. Traffic may not be eliminated but onl y redistributed. II.Not all residential streets can have heavy traffic removed by traffic diversion. Where traffic impacts on residential streets cannot be reduced through street or transit improve- ments, those impacts should be offset by public trade-offs such as street landscaping and noise buffers. PUBLIC/TRAF'FTC COMMISSION MEMNG SEPTEMBER 28, 1"5 Engineer Lauber responded that he will research this and provide a copy of the chapter on School Area Safety from the Traffic Engineers Manual to the Commission. The direction from the Commission is to file the Warrant Policy. 3.Starlight Ridcie Speed Enforcement Traffic Engineer Lauber distributed the'speed report and showed slides depicting sight distance at the intersection of Santa Cecilia Drive and Agena Street. Staff recommended moving forward on the "Street Modification Policy'. Staff would like to work with the community to create modifications. PUBLIC COMMENTS Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, representing Starlight Ridge Home Owners' Association, reiterated his concern as the problem has not been resolved and the area is not safe until "Stop" signs are installed. William Utermomien, 42231 Cosmic Drive, distributed photos of vehicle skid marks resulting from excessive speed in front of his home in Starlight Ridge, he recommended a "Stop" sign at every intersection. Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, President of Starlight Ridge Home Owners' Association, spoke in favor of curb modifications including islands to define the neighborhoods. He offered his services to be part of a possible committee to help resolve this problem. Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern for this problem but felt the Commission could not approve a 4-way "Stop" on Santa Cecilia Drive and Agena Street. He mentioned that a grant had been received in conjunction with the school district to install a side walk on Santa Cecilia Drive from Cosmic Drive to Vail Elementary. Engineer Lauber asked the Starlight Ridge residents to work with the community to design the new sidewalk by getting together as Temecula citizens. He also stated that he will provide a copy of his report to the Starlight Ridge residents. Engineer Lauber stated that after researching all other possibilities, if staff finds that nothing else can be done the "Stop" sign will be installed. Commissioner Perry recommended that the Commission explore the area themselves and place installation of 'Stop' signs as an action item on the next Agenda. He stated that "we need to take remedial action in this area". Engineer Lauber stated that the Public Works Department is taking the "Stop Sign Installation Policy" bef ore the City Council on October 1 7, 1 995 which requires Council approval. Miiaut".Pu\092895 4 AGENDA REPORT TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:December 7, 1995 SUBJECT:Item 4 Starlight Ridge Neighborhood Safety - Progress Report RECOMMENDATION: Discussion only BACKGROUND: On October 26, 1995 the Public/Traffic Safety Comniission recommended that staff submit the proposed 'Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets" to the City Council as soon as possible. The goal of both staff and the Comniission is to put a policy in place that would regulate the closure and/or modifications of residential streets for traffic calming throughout the City of Temecula. The Director of Public Works was concerned about the previous approval received from the City Attomey's office over a year ago. Because of these concerns, staff re-submitted the proposed policy back to the City Attomey's office to guarantee all possible issues are resolved before City Council consideration. This item has since received a confirmation from the City Attorney and is tentatively set for the City Council meeting of December 12, 1995. To prepare this Commission for the onset of Neighborhood Traffic Calming requests, staff has gathered numerous references dealing with this issue. Although each author may not represent the views and beliefs of the Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division, staff feels that this information will assist everyone in understanding possible options and industry terminology. F7ISCAL BWACT: None Attachment: 1.The Traffic Calming Toolbox 2.Proposed Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets "The Traflic Calmine Toolbox Bv TRANSTECH EARGLU= INC. THE TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX INTRODUCTION As is the case in many cities of many sizes. the City of Alhambra is continuously addressing the difficult problems presented by the intrusion of vehicles upon collector streets with front-facing residences. Although this situation is common throughout the industrialized world, the special circumstances in ANmbm make the conflict particularly troublesome. Because the Interstate 7 1 0 Freewav has not yet been completed across the city, regional and sub-regional trips which would otherwise utilize the freeway must find their way through available public corridors. Coupled with the si 'ficant volumes which normally utilize the street system, the additional loadiniz exacerbates glu an issue which is sensitive under normal circumstances. The problems and perceived problems of this regional trip loading onto local collector streets has recentlv resulted in a focused analysis in the neighboring communities of San Marino and South Pasadena. As a result of these investigations, there have been proposals put forward to employ various "traffic canning" measures along some roadwav corridors, some of which would directly affect traffic operations within the City of Alhambra. Ths report attempts to provide the cirv with an overview of the available "traffic ca@ng" tools in an open. factual method, so that conunuruty leaders mav understand the available options, the proposals being offered, and the likeiv consequences. THE CONCERN .The additional volumes loaded from the missing freewav segment onto the remaining streets have created an uncomfortable situation for the adjacent neil-hborhoods. In general terms, this condition ,xill develop in an area where the demand for higher-capacitv streets is not accommodated (where the available street hierarchy structure is incomplete, or where travel demand exceeds arterial capacitv). This discomfort becomes a legitimate concern for neighborhood safety when some vehicles. frustrated bv the inefficiency of travelin2 on smaller streets. exceed a reasonable speed. The combination of hiaher vehicular volume and occasionally excessive speeds is seen as an intrusion into residential neighborhoods which reduces the qualirv of life, increases the potential for traffic accidents. and increases the severitv of accidents. If the community judges the street traffic characteristics to have exceeded the "reasonable" threshold. pressure to address the situation will be applied to the jurisdictional authority throuizh petitions. calls, letters. or at public meetin!zs. When the general discomfort of a neighborhood are focused bv a particular incident. the concerns of the community will manifest into an outcry for the local authorities to remedy the situation by whatever "The Traflic Calmint, Toolbox Bv TR,4)V.TTECH EA(G /A' roadways and neighborhoods from an overburdening @c load. Defining the proper balance will require a case-bv-case analysis for each street under consideration. Achieving and maintaining the proper balance Aill require the application of the right combination of potential measures. Developing a recommended practice will be a question of balance. and will require a sensitivity to liability exposure. TRAFFIC CALMING To our knowledle,- the term "Traffic Calming" was first utilized in addressing this of complaint during a transportation conference in the city of Darwin, Australia in 1990. The new term applies to anv and all measures intended to divert, discourage, or slow vehicular trips in a sub-area (Level 1. Local Area Traffic Management); on a particular route (Level II, Sections of Arterial Roads), or even on a metropolitan scale (Level III, Citv-Wide Calming). The Australian traffic engineering community has most-fully developed the practice, and much can be learned from their efforts. Within the United States, the City of Portland, Oregon, has been the onlv municipality which has so far adopted the theory of "Tmffic Calming" as a practice, applving selective calming measures dailv through the Traffic Calming division of the city's Traffic Engineering Department. The Citv of Seattle.. Washington. has been deploying @c control measures within residential commuruties for almost two decades. but has not developed a coordinated program. Seattle has been installing small traffic diverters in residential intersections to deflect and slow traffic since 1978. Other communities across the nation have developed programs of their own. others are starting to experiment with traffic calming. There is an undeniable trend to appiv calming measures across the nation. following the examples of Europe and Australia. In spite of the intensi@- interest. there presently is no balanced recommended practice offered in the literature surrounding "Traffic Calmine" bevond the point developed bv the Citv of Portland. For the most part. traffic calming techniques are merely a collection of potential measures which will divert or discourage trips from a route or area. Even in Portland. there is onlv a rudimentary 'dt:rat'on given to the legitimacy of the perceived problem. no analvsis of the implications of consi 1 trip diversion. benefits to trip reduction. or disbenefits to forciniz trips onto alternate and more circuitous routes. which mav or mav not be more capable of satisfying trip demand with greater safetv or less conflict with the adjacent community. Now oniv in its infancy, Traffic Calming as a theorv has far to go before a recommended policy of implementation could be endorsed by Deportation professionals. Progress toward a recommended policv for implementation of traffic calming techniques will most likely be verv slow. as the issue (like school zone devices) is very locally sensitive. A considerably larger data base must be de@-eloped and analvzed re-ardiniz the devices, their implications, effectiveness, and alternatives. It -will be up to the local Deportation engineer and the elected officials within each community to "The Traffic Colmine Toolbox Bv 7RANM INC @c control devices (signing, striping, pavement markings, channelization, lighting) in a coordinated manner in order to precisely dictate the desired driving behavior to the motorist, at all times (or at least at all decision points). If the devices are properlv deploved, there should be no doubt in the driver's mind what his proper behavior should be. In applving the theory as a traffic c@ng device. the course of action would be to even overkill the sensitive roadway with speed limit signing, reflectors, street lighting, pavement markings (centerline, edge line, pavement messages), and whatever other devices mav be effective in both providing guidance to the driver, and in imparting to him that he is in a sensitive envirorunent. The proliferation of devices delivers the message that their behavior is being assertively dictated. 4.Warning i@nina It is not wise to over-saturate any area with warning signs (black on yellow background), especially with exaggerated or false warnings. The result will be an increased disrespect for the legitimate warning signs, and an overall degradation of roadway safety. Studies conducted bv the Transportation Research Board, in conjunction with the Federal HiLhway Administration and the Institute of Transportation Engineers conclusively show that indirect warning signing such as "Children at Play" have no positive benefit. Such signs are not authorized for use on public streets. There are situations where a waminc, sign or silns ma-,, be lelitimatelv emploved in an overall effort to calm @ic. If there is a limited si(yht distance. curve, hidden intersection. street narrowing, or other roadwav factor that should be brought to the attention of an approachiniz motorist, particularly if the concern of the community is with safety, the use of appropriate waminq signing should be considered. 5.Intersection Channelization (movement Restrictions) -Intersection channelization as a tmffic caln-iing device is ememely effective in reducing the vehicular voltune on a particular route. Either throuizh paint or throuszh raised phvsical barriers. channelization can limit the access onto or off of a particular street. It can be emploved in various ways to sinszle out a particular intersection movement (left-out, straight throuizh. right-in, etc.), or a combination of movements in order to force trips desiring that movement onto an alternative route. This methodology has been emploved nationally for several decades in "calming" the cut- throutzh demand on a local street adjacent to an overburdened arterial. As with other localized phvsical diverters, channelization diverts trips but does not discourage trips from beiniz made. The consequences of the trip diversions should be considered when employing 5 "The TraiLic Calm int, Toolbox Rv LR,4,VSTECH EVG RS I)VC into the buffer areas in order to present a less forgiving environment are applied. Most typically, roadside treatments consist of a choker treatment limiting the width of the street either at selected mid-block locations, or most commonly at intersections. The narrowing has a secondary impact of making a more controlled pedestrian crossing. Statistics can show that @ic accidents are more likely to occur in areas which look open and'clear of conflict, but which have hidden obstacles. Roadways with more apparent obstacles sometimes operate with better accident rates than roadways with subtle shortcomings. With @ic calming, an intentional and obvious constricted envirorunent is presented to incoming traffic in the attempt to reduce the comfort level of the driver and increase alertness and reduce speed. There are indications that there may be an improvement in accident rate in some cases. However, the low overall cost-effectiveness of @s optior4 combined with possible problems in emergency services and increased liability exposure, make it difficult for most authorities to endorse the application of obstacles into the roadway environment as a worthwhile @ic management device. 7.@eed Hug= In spite of a considerable amount of resistance from highwa@, and safety professionals, speed humps are being applied under certain circumstances to public roadways at an accelerating pace. In certain areas of the country, and in the face of greatly increased exposure to tort liability Judgements. their installation is becoming fairly common. Still, in manv areas of the United States, speed bump installation is severelv restricted. even from most "ways open to the public" on commonly owned private property. A sununary of speed hump programs in otherjurisdictions is shown in the followin- table: 7 "The Traffic Calmint, Loolhox Bv TRA)V. IAIC. Originally, they were narrow bands of raised pavement intended (but not designed) to force traffic to proceed slowly or have their vehicles phvslcaliv punished at higher speeds. Operationally, however, the devices most often punished the prudent majon'tv of drivers while sometimes giving the imprudent drivers a smoother ride at a hiaher speed. Onlv recently have speed humps been employed on public streets. and with the public liability exposure came the need to engineer speed hiunp design for specific effect. Most people are verv familiar with -speed humps, many haye'ekperienced them on public streets, but few are aware of the continuous experimentation and evaluation being conducted in the design and performance of the device. The standard speed hwnp design applied for the last decade was documented by the Citv of Thousand Oaks, California. Recently, the preferred designs have been referred to as the "Watts profile" or "flat top" humps. The design preference is now shifting toward the "sine wave" hump, or the very elongated profile hump developed for Seminole County, Florida. Regardless of the specific design, if this tool is emploved, a thorough documentation of design and implementation analysis seems critical to address liability exposure. Speed humps can be an effective tool which can be used to address an abuse of an imposed street hierarchy under certain circumstances (if the inherent speed of traffic is not above 30 mph. if there is adequate sight-distance and warning, and if there is a preferred alternative route). There should be a policy researched and adopted before anv installations are considered. 8.Stop Si,,-,ns The deployment of Stop signs along a route in order to address the issue of inappropriate traffic characteristics has been utilized for several decades. Stop slcrm'n!z is most often an effective and inexpensive method of addressing the concern. However, the tool is so powerful that its use for calming traffic has been resisted by. transportation professionals. An over-proliferation of Stop signs used for @ic calmin!z has an undermining effect on all other Stop si-ans, and on all other @ic control devices. bv creating a contempt for them in the mind of the driving public. There has been some research conducted on the effect of "unwarranted" stop si-ns. or installations which do not meet the minimum traffic criteria for stop sip installation as recommended by the State's Traffic Manual. the Manual of Uniform Tmffic Control Devices, and other Stop sian warrant systems. In the publication "An Evaluation of Unwarranted Stop SIL,ns" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, a conclusion was reached that "the hierarchy of the street svstem must be identifiable and the arterial and collectors must be sufficient to meet demand." Without an established and adequate hierarchy, misuse of lower-level streets will develop. The study reconunends that communities develop and 9 "The 7r@ic Calmint, Toolbox Bi H ENGIIVEERS INC 11.Parking The presence of roadside parking (on-street) along a street encroaches into the roadside buffer areas and restricts sight@stances similarly to other obstacles. It is interesting to note that the restriction of sight-&stance created by on-street parking is the most common factor in residential street pedestrian / vehicle @c accidents. Forthis reason alone. a relaxation of an existin parking restriction for traffic calming purposes has not been sen'ouslv . 9 considered as an option. 12.One-way The installation of a one-way traffic restriction is not easily achieved. By far the foremost obstacle to further consideration of the one-wav street alternative is the fact that a proximate couplet street must be present. With the reverse@ction couplet, volumes are split between two routes. Tv picallv, this means a reduction for one street, but an increase for the couplet. This increase is politically acceptable in most circumstances only if the street is alreadv commercial bv nature, and in need of additional traffic exposure. The one-way tool is iznpactive in many ways to the adjacent properties. Access becomes a constant irritant. However. the traffic efficiencv of the route becomes vastlv improved. as conflicting turning movements are eliminated. The one-way couplet setup can acconunodate a hlizh traffic demand with ease. Althou!zh not conunon. it is an option which should be 'dered if the IoL,'cal couplet can be developed. The one-wav couplet is a traffic calming consi -1 tool which may provide both a perceived improvement to quality of life, and an actual improvement to traffic efficiency and safety. 13.Truck Restrictions The truck mix@e of a street's averaize dailv traffic mav be an important aspect of the neighborhood concern. Trucks are ob=ive in size. noise. exhaust. and legitimately do not belon!z on streets lower in the hierarchy. An acencv must be careful not to exclude truck @ic from a corridor unless a locical alternative truck route is available, however, a truck restriction is le2al1v achievable and politically acceptable in most communities. It frequently mav serve as a sufficiently effective @c calming device. Truck restrictions, as well as other potential regulatory measures 14.Closure The -'ultimate" calming technique is an option frequently requested bv at least a se,,Ment of the affected residential community. Although this option can often be easily dismissed as I I "The Trad:lc C-almint, Toolbo.,r Bi- TRAN lArC. CONCLUSION This report is intended to provide a greater understanding of the issues involved with the evolving application of =ffic c@g techniques. What can be concluded at @s point in time from the data presented is that although there are several options when presented with the concern. each situation should be treated as unique. A thorough understanding of the real problem, the options. and their consequences should be attained before action is undertaken. The specific measures under consi 'deration should be evaluated carefully against the roadway characteristics, driver behavior. operational consequences, and against the proven Mffic problems to ensure that the application of the measures will improve the situation. The need to manage mffic c@ng devices in residential applications is not new, but it is growiniz 'dlv and will not go away. Until a more uniform policy is developed, the urban traffic engineer rapi must seek to find a balance in each case. TrafEc g as a concept encompasses anv effort to reduce or c the negative impacts of motor vehicles on residential arew and local activitv districts. It does not mean the complete c on of mm and trucks, but rather the implementation @f controls (such as. strict speed limits), the co ction of devices (such as @c humps), or the reo on of systems (such as diversion of throup-h-@c) with the airn of allowing people and machines to comfortably and safely. Under this specific de@tion, =ffic @g does not include ped@ani@tion, the creation of automobile- free zones, the orgnni-tion of pedestrian pock=, the building of downtown malls, the mp@g of overall circulation networks, the designation of b@vs, the control of pollution, S=ral pro to prevent @c accidents, etc. All these positive actions have their own approaches, m@ods and standards, and their oAm volun-Linous bibliographies. Such rcfer=ccs are not included here. idea of traffic calmin2 can be traced back to the verv first appearance of the motor car that izcnerated 'derable anxieties about personal safet,,,. There are also notable cariv efforts ' the United States that consi in have attempted to deal with the automobile in a rational and constricting N%-av (Radburn. for example). Dun'niz the period of suburbanization and automobilization after World War 11, on the other hand. there has been finle thouiZhE given to traffic calmine 'in this countr%,, and the concept almost could 'have be= Class'@ as "un-American." There have been a few but ver% ' lated thrusts (Berkele%., for example). L I ISO Attitudes appear to be chaneing, ho-.-.,cver, 'in the 1990s, and increasing interest can be discerned in North America. Papers are be'ma presented occasionally at Deportation con&rences. which are not al%@-a,,-s published. as for e%ample in recent vears at the annual Januarv conferences of the Transportation Research Board in WashinLrton. In Europe. a much more aggressive policy has been adopted in the hien%, 'Mdusffialized countries since the 1970s. Tnere have been hundre@s. @f not thousands, of examples and permanent pro- and 2o,.,er=ents have taken an actl,.,e role. That is also A-h,- European references on traffic calnu'nL7 are numerous. @-hile the American inventon- is extreme]%- limited. Assuminiz that the time is ripe. there appears to be a need to bnniz the available experience to the attention of those in the New World who ma%-,%ish to 'd@ im cc)nsi -rand plemcnt traffic calm'ng procrams in the r communities. To be bruruall%- frank about the whole bus';ness. the elements. devices. and actions used to accomplish traf,ic cainunz- are rather obvious. This %%-hole in%-entor\- is some%%-hat limited and is described re' eatedlv in p man% of tL- references contained in this bibilo2rat)h\-. The real planninp- and research interest lies 'ui the experiences with this concept under dif@'crent circumstances and in differe-it places. Tn,- term "traffic calm'm2" is not \-et a household \vord, and. ind@ appears to be somnvhat quaint to most people. Ye,, as a matter of fact. it is workable and full,%! descriptive of the idea. Given the sequence of de%,.-lopment. the Enizilsh term Is a direct translation of the earlier German "VerkehrsberuhiLrung." It is still in I I 'd c--ri-,- cia\-sthe definition and general acc.-pt--nce of the traffic caimin2 concept as an I entifiable area of research andpractice. A consequence of this fact is that a numbe.- of other terms are @ll 'in use. The,%, are not e%actl%- kev words, but the-.. %\ill be found in references and as descriptors of fo@ and informal programs in various countries. 3.Emergency vehicle access should be accommodated in keeping within the emstine Fire Bureau response standards. If cur-rent emergency vehicle access does not meet the @stng response standard, traffic cabning efforts should not further degrade the response time. 4.Transit service access. safety. and scheduling should not be significantly impacted. S.Reasonable automobile access should be maintained. Pedes@. bicycle, and transit access should be encouraged and @anced wherever possible and within budget limitations. Projects should be coordinated with.the Bicycle and. Pedestrian programs where appropriate. 6.Parking removal should be considered on a project-by-project basis. Parldng needs of residents should be balanced with the equally important functions of traffic, emergency vehicle access, @sit, bicycle, and pedestrian movement. 7.Application of the Traffic Calming Program shall be limited to those Neighborhood Collector Streets that are primarily residential, and to Local Service Streets. Where appropriate. projects on Neighborhood Collector Streets should be coordinated with projects on Local Service Streets. 8.Traffic c g projects on Neighborhood Collector Streets shall not divert traff:Lc off the project street through the use of traffic diversion devices. As a result of a project on a Neighborhood Collector, the amount of traffic increase acceptable on a parallel Local Service Street shall not e--cceed 150 vehicles per dav. 9.Traffic mav be rerouted from one Local Service Street to another as a result of a traffic c g project. The acceptable ;raffic increase should be def3.ned on a project-bv-project basis. An "impact threshold curve" (see Appendix B) establishedby the Portland Office of Transportation shall serve as a gwdeline to determine the amount of rerouted traffic that is acceptable on Local Service Program, certain procedures should be followed bv the Office of Transpor-cation in processing =affic calming requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the @ts of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for submi@ of project proposals, project evaluation and selection citizen participation: communication of anv test results and specific fmdines to project area residents and affect@d neighborhood organizations before g devices; and appropriate Council Streets. 10.To implement the Traffic C installation of permanent traffic c review. 4 OBJECTI@'ES The overall objectives of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program are derived from existing Citv polic@. and the mis5ion of the Portland Office of Transportation. Thev are, I Improve neighborhood livabiii[v bv mitigating the impact of vehicular traffic on residential neia4borhoods. Promote safe and pleasant conditions for moto@Ls, bicyclists, pedestrians. and residents on neighborhood streets. 3.Encourage citizen involvement in all phases of neighborhood traffic manaapment acti%@iies. z;- \,take efficient use of Citv resources bv prioriti:lng traffic management requests. 5.Support the policies contained in the Tran-@-Dortation Element of the COMDre- hensive Plan to "provide for the safe and e!,ficien[ movement of people and 2oods while prese@@na, e.,ihancinc. or reclaiming the nelahborhoods'li%@abil- it@"' and to ",auide the use of the cit%- street to zontrol air pollution. traffic. and livabilirv probiem-r,." AM TYPES OF PROJECTS The N'T@IP includes tA-o t@ es of projects- "P 1. local service street projects and 2) collector recovery projects. In addition. neighborhood area studies are conducted b@- the Transportation P@ng Di%uion of the Office of Transportation. This brochure provides information to residents to heid them participate in local se;-%-ice street projects. Collector recoverv proiects and neighborhood area smdies are ai-@o brieq@, described here to acouain[ the readerw@th the other tr.,iiic management options hat are a%?ailable and exoiain the tio@ in "-hi-h the%- aoDl\-. Local sen@ce street pr@iezu, are intended to respond to traffic Issued 7el,aLed Lo st)eedir,2 and excessive throuah---affic on one iocal @;:r2et in a neighborhood. Solutions ma%- lri@iude -e%isiLinc-z to the local street Lo siliv,- .-'fic or t :i -o comr)ietel%- or t)ar[iallv diverl :ra@'ic off of the :-zireei. -en, proic.,:-z aacire-- cj,tle-@,or reco@ traffic -jes on c Lr la-z-; "L'i 1 e i e, 2 ri o o r,@,,) c,@ile.-ror Th@e at,. street- w'tlicl, are idredominanil%- resia'@-itial. The goal 1-@ to deveioi) education. e-iorcemen[. and eicineenno measures z,, iecrea4-zc The ,a nej tine impacts @oc@ d A-it'ri '-;Dee"lil@ and excessive volumes on nei@,iDcr'nood collector streets. The issues @ffel- ot)t)or,.i.,- niiies for mitigation umaue to collector streets and different from those applied through local se,-%ice street projects. ineighb orhood area studies respond to excessive throu2h--raffic spet!dine or. multiple streets in one or more nelz'ri'Dor- hoods. These plan:- are recuired to resdon@- to traffic problem-, @t are s%-mpLomai:c oi wider problems. such as congestion or lacl--, of capacitv on :he ane-ial s@-stem. The problems may be similar co those addressed bN, local se-%@@e street projects. but are more pervasive. A-ith hion volumes of chrouc,@- traffic on more one adiacent siree,. Neighborhood arc studies are de%-eloded pnr'naril%- t'nrouj@ 7 e Tr3@orution Piannincy Di@,sion. %@-iih the invol%-e-nent of other Cit%- burcluz. The%, rN-Dicall%- include anai%,ri5 ol iir.,.4 use and traffic patte.@- boi'r-. @%IL@in and outside the stud\- area. and include invoix-e-ne.-,,, of affected net hbor- 9 hood a5s,,)ciaiioris. . business amups, and indi\@duai-@ -.hrouLy'nout the Droc@--z. The%- are schedu'ed b d on ax-ailabie resource I a-ce and given pric@[%- i'.-;ctor-@ chat inc'ude but are not :LI PreN-Iou;z e" !io7:;-z or requesi-z in irie area InLe,,isii@- of @L@,e -iroble:L-.-z Decrell ot Delwee7i :raiii: conditioner -1,id ',-and uses @vaii aoiiil@' "I Artenai imiDrL,%-e@,en[ projects scheduled ,r oianne,-. L T'ne purpose of the petition-to-studv is to de,.ermine the level of a ement among resideic3 on the project street that there is a i)robiem Lhev want to address. Cit@ staff prepare the petiuon, describing the problem and the. proce- dures to be follo%%,ed if a study is undertaken. The project requestorl's) is responsible for circulating the petition. with Citv 5tal'i assistance as reouired. Sic-,naiures representing a majontv of the households ,n@'ousmesses @Ehir, t'ne ,-e,ition-to-szud%- area are required -.o mo@-c the project fonvard. Each household and busines-@, is entitled ,o oi,,e signature. Non-reside-,it pr'ope-T@ oi@'riers are nLL included in the petition- to-5tudv proc@,-zz-:. 4.Plan DeN,elopment The Citv ho'ta'_; a public meeting in -.he area to infOrTi' off the pe,-lc:inz i),-,)iec:. to d@-cc-ibe Lhc N--@'v[P proc@s;-z. ar.c to catner additional informaiilr. about the orooicp:- and re',.a:c@ nc'2@,borhoL,d LIZen cl)mmitiez, Lq L tr,ii-@ 5caLe. :I,aiiic committee work:- k'-itv @,-Lal".'io dee.-mine its me-n'oel sl,iio ciiier&a irc meetin@ Drocedures. ar.@u conunu@- to work- cioseiv with irirouahout the re-nainde7 of the pro-@ect. Plan :@--.,eior)ment consists of the A-z,:@z-:.ment of problems and nee@-;-: Id en---,icacion oi projec-. ooai.-z ir.@" ob@.--@%,es a Ide-:iication of evaluation cnie-,ia - De,.-.,-jpment of alternative plans/ soi,.:,:on-r e-@.-:,-On oi a proposed plan The two -Zzeps are accomplished thrc-.::--- pubiic meeeincc. neia4bor'nood@ assDc:@---On meetings. and traffic comrrut- tee The Cit%- proposes 5oiL,!.:@--z ba:,eci on uiis citizen input and SOLI-Z @-,i,a.ne@nng pnnc-Lt)ies. Po;-4-Z'L'ole solu.::. --z anc rrieir imi)acts are e@-aiuated b%- i@-. --@ffic zommitice. Citv bureaus. and aff@-[ed a@eicies. 5.Test Retaliation Or.@12@-ian -,-;: acree,., on o%, the ar"-'l C@t%- -z:af@. tne a pe,ition desc-ibinz the Prot:,oro!e-c, and callinz tor installation. Traff:: cor."-rcuiate the "7 as reouireci. For projec--z that do not include traffic diversion. a rnajoritv of -,hose ballots that are reumed must be in favor of the projec,, for it to proceed to Citv Council action. For projec-;: that do include traffic diversion remo%,ino or rerouting an existing flow of traffic through con- Str,UCtion or I phvsical barriers such as cul-de-sac-; or full or partial diveners). the majont@. of elic-ible households and businesses In the @allol area must respond fa%-orabiv For e.@,mpie. with s' 100 eligible @ou choid5/businesses. 51 affirmative - responses must be received for the project to proceed. Eac-,i household busine-@-;. and non- resident pror)e,,7@- owner is entitled to one ballot. Citv Council Action PTL)le."t iiil)n and a -,nc T'-Lc re:)or7 inz ;zzices [tic Desi!,n and Construction Final desin and construction is administered b%- the L-ic\- and is aencrallv @.)mr)ieed 12 months afte,- :he ballot. S. Base-', in - i@ r) o s @l i ic ;, a " c i. t,, predare.a i or Clt\- outlines 'ne ine proie,.. reasons fL,- .'.,ie jrolec: required -@.!,"Ot -Li i-@ not for-,%-arde@-@ :1.1 L-Ii%' (--L)unc,; 10.Monitorino, The Portland Office ol Trar,-;-Dor-,aLl,.,r, and the Bureau of Park5 and Re.-rea-lor, monitor constructed de%-icez. The Office of Transportation is rp-sdonsicie for the phvsical appearance of the proje-.,- and for traffic control device-. and the Bureau of Park5 ir reSpOnr--lDIC for landscape maintenance. 11.Follow-Up Evaluation \&;'ithin 3--o 5 vear@- after ol an NT\.IP oroject. the Citv zonduc,@ a follow-ud evaluation to deee-mine .',,he . . i I projects -70ais anci oojec,,i\-e,-z contin,-,e to be mei. This e% -aluation .mav enl-,il traffic szudies of volumes. sdeeds. and accidents. as well as public )Dtnion Aimchme,it 2 TR.,KFFIC NIANAGENFENT DE@ICES This :)ro%ide-r,3 brief descriptitin oi . 3. @hoker5 or curb eXten5iOn5 ral',O%@' @%icenin@ ti-ie s il% 5ome --ommonl@- used traffic management the s-,rec,'D% de%-.czz-. A c.@art summarzino-Ehe effect:- or the lan@caded par@inz 3tric. These d a Vn EC 7L-,aK@ these and Other pos5-Lble devices is also re emr)io inc;uded. pedestrian c.,ossin2s casic7 and LD narrow the roadwav The,.- pro%-ide -a 1. Traffic circles are rated islands visual Cue LO Motorists that the%. are Dlac.-d in an intersection. The on a non-artenai route. pnmarv pumose of a traffic circle is to slow hiah-speed traffic. Traffic 4. Semi-diverters limit access to a circles are most effective when street frorr, one direction b@- bioca-inc, constricted in -i series on a local half the -zz-ect. The,, . m-a@- a@o be @-er.,ic@ zirce,. @n additional bene,,,,. corlsirucle@- -Io @imit certain move- is that the,.- reduce the number of me,,iL:- at an intersection. -@tmi- reported ICC-Lde-iLr. kreported ciiverter:- ire aeie.,aliv eiTez:l%,e ir, accidents Lend co be more severe reduc@na -,-oiumes. esdeclail%- if Ehe Inan unreported acclIdenLc.) predominanc direction of i-a%,e! on I street is the one "-here access LI: Cul-de-sacs are COMD'[Cte CiOSUre--z 01" reduced. -, hn, allow a hlq'.rier [.Ile -Zzree:. eitne7 midblock or at ar. of vehicle acces-c tnar. ,,li- inLerse.,:ion. i ic%, a.-', inteiced to de--zac-z or -@la@onai diverie7:-. @:,mpie,el%- biL)c'@ ac.-es5 irom one end oi local Bv doi,,@ so 5. Diaconal diverters DiaCC -,-rosz ir, !nLersc:[ioT-.. L"3]OT @e3uc,,,C-.-Z 111, ird )nne,.:,nz Lrie i@;z oi tre 1)[Ume result. @ c,.i@-@e-sac insi -IC2@ ire ,real@ Drobiens ir. -Iduc,,n2 -volume. T'-Ie,.- IC-2s-; aiioik,.,norc ,,ecciom,)i @10 c)ie- can in-7@ 2hbor-,-)od @L--n cie--zac-;. @:a@,.,nai d@%-2-ter-z @ar,c-I -c -icie :11, L 11 i insallee .o 'Irk)% -L r-.ouire,.- @o the,,- DrcLerT%- emer2elic"".,ehicle acces-c- route @f access bloc.-, Tr@c C@ Dev&=for CoU=to,-,Srcwr EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the past ten years City of P@d has been actively developing and applying @r. manag=cnt techniques to City madways in @ w enhance livability for adjacent residents. lie enhancement of neighborhood livability has been achieved in large part by the reduction of traffic @. During this @od the City has developed and implemented the Neighkffiood Traffic ManaLement Progmm to @ss @c'related issues on residential s=--t classified as Local Scr-,iice Str=ts according to the Comp=h@ve Plan. The City is now in the process of developing the Tmffic g Program (ATCP) to address similar @c related issue on residential smets clas@ as Neighbm-hood Collectm. The fundamental diffe=nce between the prog=s, both of which sAAress =sidentw issues, is based primarily on the policy distinction be n s=e--ts classified as @ Service S@-ts and Neighborhood CoUw= Sawts according to the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. This is an important distinction in @ many of the roadways found in both of these classifications have @ar character and look, including volume, width, speed, and adjacent land-use. According to policy, however, Neighborhood Collector roadways a= to func6on as low level an@s (c@g through trips). while Local Service Sa=ts a= to serve adjacent land-use only. Thus, these two su=t classifications requires fundamentally diffr.rr.nt approaches to @c c@g. This distinction plaved a significant mle in helping to iden@ primary goals for the ATCP. Because of this policy distinction the ATCP is being developed with two goals: 1)ne first primary goal of the ATCP is the enhancements of =sidr-ntial livability along the roadway. This early includes livability enhancement for pedestrians, residents, bicyclists, =sit user, school children, ex.. The @ond primary goal of the ATCP is to maintain, to the extent possible, the anc.@ intepity of the roadway. 7be viability of the roadway to car.,-y local through =ffic should not be so de as to create si,.@cant @ic volume shifts. The devices idendfird in this =port w=t evaluated for the= ability to meet the two primary goals of the ATCP. Devices we= evaluated.in terms of speed reduction, residential enhancement, @@ enhancement, 'unp=t on @,t, impact on emergency services, impact on adjacent access, and impact on general vehicle opm-ation including sa&ry and delay. The =port categoh=s the devices according -to their cur=nt smms for appropriateness for use on co@-= roadways. 'Ibr-se categories include: Page a -3 mm SUMMMY C@g Devices for C4U&aor Sv'ccs INTRODUCTION This report has been produced as part of the development of the' Ar=Tial Traffic 9 Program, ATCP (formally the Collector Recovery Program). This comparative discussion of @c calming devices was prepared as a way of idenff*g both approved and potential devices for use as part of @ pmg=. The =port c=gorizes the devices according to their current smrus for appropriateness for use on collector roadways. Ilese categories include: Approved Devices Devices Under Test or Demonstration Potential Devices Other Devices Each device has been evaluated in the report under the following standard format.- Objecfives The broad-based primary and secondary objectives for each device. AppLfc@n The general circumstances under which use of the device can be considered both in by itself or as pan of a street scheme or plan. Limitations The limitations on the use of the device, ie., where. the device is appropriate or inappropriate. Advantages The main advantaecs or "s=ong points' in favor of use of the device. Disadvantages The main disadvantage or "-strong points" @s-, use of the device. Unresolved Issues Unrr solved issues with potential for developing into either advantages or 'disadvantages. Issues are unresolved due to lack of :field experience with device. With continued testing and demonstrations these issues will @-ome msolvez Ile report is intended to be a preliminary @line only. Tne guidelines included in this report require additional engineering expertise and judgment in the development of c solutions for c iden@d site problems. Page 9-5 RNTRODUCTION Tr&& C@ Devices for CoUartar S:rwj CURB EXTENSIONS objecfive 2@ance p@@ crossing point. n C=tc visual sc=n or b@ along li= of roadway. App@n 0 extensions are applicable on roadways with vesicular mffic perceived as being incompatible with the adja=nt @dential land use. 0Curb extensions can be installed ci@ at intersections or mid-blocl 0 Curb extensions may be used in conj@on witli other @c calming devices. Lim@ns 5Curb extensions are limited only to the degree that they extend into the travel way.. (Curb extensions cannot iinpede or re@ the two-way operation of the roadway) 0Cm-b extension can be used on all roadway classifications according to the Transportation Element of the City of P@d Comprehensive Plan with the exception of "Regional Trafficways". Adva@ges a Reduces pedestrian crossing distance and time. n Provides visual enhancement of pcdc@ cmssing point. 0P.-events passing of @g vehicles. 0Requires no deviation from s=aight @ vehicle path. 0 Facilitates transit loadine and unloading. Disadva@ges n Some parldng removal rrqui=d. 0FiL-b installation cost a F-ffr-ctive c@ extension design precludes bicycle accommodation Unresolved Issues 0Cost/benefit 5Maintenance Costs 2 Bicvcle ar-co=odation. ftge 0-7 Tr@ C@ Devices for Collacior Stregu MEEDIANS Objecfive a Provide visual cue of change in madway enV'lMr=CnL APPLFC@N 0m@ans applicable on roadways with vchiculu @ivcd as @g incompatible with the adjacent residendd land use. a Medians may be used in conjunction vath other @c cnlming devices. Limitadons nM@ans have no general limimtions. mM@s can be used on all roadway classifications according to the T@ortation Element of the City of Portland Comprehe='ve Plan with the exception of "Regional Trafflcways". Advantages a Provides visual enhancement of roadway environment (particululy if landscaped). 0Prevents passing. n Separates opposing vehicle travel lanes. Disadvantages a Major parking removal req@ 0Expensive @cul@y if lands@ing included). n F-,ohibits and/or @ts access and movemenl Unresolved Issues Bicv-cle issues n Co@nefir Pop* 2-9 Speed Sump (typical) 28' =1 Wine tfpi=l Canter of T@ Long W260 IOCY @pficnal Seciion A-A Section B-B -U cu r@ F T@ C@g Devicei for CoU@r Strecs Al FLAT q. Co of I YAMM) c6m D Opric Ica, is r r;= Lno PAJLASCUC w clan c TACK Caa T,@c C@,g De,,= fo, CoUwwr Sere= ENTRY TREATMENT objectfve s Provide visual and tactile cue to drivers of entry into specific area or environment. AppLfcadon 0Entry treatments are applicable an roadways at @tion points between two diff=nt land use environments or two diff=nt str=t classifications. 0Entry treatments may be used in conjunction with other =affic calming devices such as raised thresholds, curb extensions =&or pavement treatments. Liynitations nThe effectiveness of an entry =a=ent to influence motorist behavior is limited unless included as part of an overall =Mc calming plan for a SU=L Entry tma=ents are @ted for use on two lane or less residential su=ts classified as either "local service sa=ts" or 'neighborhood collector s=cts" according to the T=sportation Element of the City of Portland Comprehensive Plan. Advantages a @ovides strong indication of changing environment and/or drivine conditions.. n Enhances pedestrian crossing seen n Aestheticallv appealing (impmves app cc of in==don). 5 Poses no access restrictions for roadway users. Disadvantages a Pivement trea=ent or brick work is very exp@ve. Unresolved Issues a Cost a CosT/Benefit 2Device maintenance issues. 1-13 Tr4rLc g Device--for Concaor szr@ DIAN SLOW POINT A 10 4 L> A AM-BLOCK 20- ON A-A v S.Ecn LA 1N,.iERSECTION ftgo 8-16 Traf,c C@ Devices fo,- COD Stregu Unresolyed Issues nAccess issues for mncrgency services and r=it vehicles. nDevice maintenance issues. 0cost aDevice desip a Device gs ftpo 2-18 IDEVIC@ LINDLA I'@ URU@WON.S JUN 7rqrtc Deywesjbr CaUecior Siregrs COLORED & TEXTURF-D PAVF- TREATMENTS obje,cfive 0Reduce v@cle speed. 0 Provide visual and =dle cue to drivers of entry into specific =a or environment App&-@n 0Col@ & t=rumd pavement trca=ents am applicable on roadways with v@cular perceived as being incompatible with the adjacent residential land use. aMay be used in conjunction with other mffic calming devices such as raised thresholds, curb extensions and/or pavement tma=ents.- Lim&dons aColored & Textured pavement ==ents are limited for use on two lane or less =sidentw str=rs cwsified as 'local service s=cts" or "neighborhood collector s==ts" accordingto the Transpormrion Element of the City of Portland Comprehensive Pi= 8The e.Tccrivencss of colmrd & textured pavement tma=cnt is limited unless included as pan of an overall @c management plan for a sa=L aTextured pavement treatments arc limited by the degree of tma=ent mughness (roulrhness impacts noise and bicyclc/motarcyclc safety). Adva=ges s Provides s=g indication of changing environment and/or driving conditions. 0If tactile enough, speed reduction possible. 0Potentially aesthetically appealing Cif brick or block is used) 0Poses no access restrictions for roadway users. a Rcquirts no paridng removal Disadvantages 0The more @e, the more noisy. 2Possibly c=tes hazard for bicyclists 0 If not tactile enou@ limited =Mc calming value. DEVJ@ UIVL)ER T@ uxv&m ftgo B-.w Tra& C@ Devs=for CoUz=r S&ecr POTENTIAL DEVICES potential devices a= devices which have pomntial for use on higher volume residentw stmets and/or the Arr@al Traffic Calrning Program, but due to design cons=aints cannot be tested or demonstrated on the two existing test proje=. 'It is recommc@ that devices id=dfied in this category be -tested or demons=am4 when appropriate, as par t of furu= proje=. Oaly the s@ntine/offset device cur=ntly faus i= this camgory. Page 1-23 Po 1 t-,Vj AL 10 Tr@ C@ng Device-r for C*Uecior Sirecs SERPENT OFFSET New Curb Une .......... IL IQ CITY OF TEMECULA POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODMCATION OF TRAMC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all 'official traffic control devices" authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods autho@ in particular circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design .features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow. A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re- @ning ]Rreviously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meeting all of the following criteria: a.The street must be classified as a 'local street' based on the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. b.Ile street should be primarily residential in nature. c.Traffic volumes on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day. d.Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification. e.An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets which may be impacted by diverted traffic. The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the City. g.AD persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or @c flow modification acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate im , prove ments needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. h. 'Me requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law. PETMON KMUIR The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City: r. *o@\ac 11/95/ajp a.The City Traffic Engineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated impacts of the proposed street closure or Mffic flow modifications. This review will include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with engineering regulations, existing @c conditions, projected traffic conditions, the potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for the City or conflicts with future planned improvements. b.The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of -the 'affected area' to be petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes are altered by the street closure or @c flow modifications, and/or properties which are significantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted. c.The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be supported by a minimum of 75 percent of the total number of properties within the "affected area.' Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure or modifications in @c flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer that at least 85 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow modification or have signed a document indicating non-support for the street closure or traffic flow modification. d.At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following: 0 A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's polic y that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area' must be provided. The drawing must include changes in @c patterns anticipated as result of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0The petition language must also clearly explain the location and nature of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0The petition language and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior tD circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to be clearly understood. 0A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizing such street closure or traffic flow modifications must be provided. A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this policy. .2- rk@\poticywc 11/95/sip PETMON REVIEEW PROCESS The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a proposed street closure or trafflc flow modifications: a.The City Tmffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is autho@ by State law. Any petition.not complying with these requirements will not be accepted for consideration. b.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable, these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit Agency, the local office of California Department of Transportation and any other agencies affected by the requested closure or @c flow modification. C.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of st=ts may be accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow modifications or street closure has been received and verified by the City. The purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the greatest community support. CM ACITON ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FTOW MODMCATTON RWUESTS Once a petition contains all of the required information and all of the matters described above under 'Petition Review Process' have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Pubhc/Traffic Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referml responses received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review. 'ne City of Temecula Pubhc/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend against the street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the proposed street closure or @c flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to the decision, the 12 owner shall file a written notice of with the Doartment of Public Works. The will be heard in accordance with the A@ @ss listed below, If the request is recommended for @er consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after -3- r\ \policv\gw@11/95/min maidng any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or @c flow modifications. When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below: a.A letter explaining the street closure or @c flow.modifications and the time and place'when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property owners, within the affected area prior to its installation. b.All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying motorists of upcoming Public Hearing. C.A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be given at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners in the affected area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and by a notice published in the newspaper. d.Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs giving notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications win also be erected at least two weeks prior to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic modifications. e.In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21 101 or 21 100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or @c flow modification. LA letter explaining the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all property owners, within the affected area. Tle CityCouncil has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify, continueor den any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any . y support or lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or deny a street closure or traffic flow modifications request will be by adoption of a formal resolution. 11/95/ajp DEPAR OF PUBIIC WORKS PETMON TO CIA)SE OR MODEFY THE C FLOW ON S BE AND BY THE INSTALLATION OF (Nature of Chani!es) AT @tion) DATIE: BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CrrY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION OF C FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS. We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of Temecula to on as shown on the attached drawing. All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or @c flow modification. Tle specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications states: All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted by the proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map. Our designated contact per-son is: Phone: Signature Print Name Print Address APPENDIX "All R@ AM REGULATIONS: SUBJF= MAT= VEEgCl,E CODE SECMON 21 100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution regarding the following matters: a.Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the highways. h.Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passenger vehicles for hire. C.Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers. d.Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of Section 21400. e.Regulating traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable, at the scenes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic direction for orderly traffic flow. No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local authority has submitted to the commissioner or to the chief law enforcement officer exercising jurisdiction in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until the commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer approves the proposed program. The commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assigned to perform the duty described in this subdivision. f.Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons authorized for such duty by the local authority. g.Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority, excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under Section 11505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing agency licensed under Chapter 1 1 (commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and county pursuant to Section 121 1 1. h.Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks. i.Providing for the appointment of nonstudent school crossing guards for the protection of persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning thereafter to a place of safety. j.Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority. k.Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless (1) that person has been given the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control point and then again passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by signs that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local ordinance or resolution on cruising. 1.Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire lane, as described in Section 22500. 1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650). TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIEFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS VEMCLE CODE SECTION 21 100.1 Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400. REGULATION OF E[IGHWAYS VEMCLE CODE SECTION 21101. 'Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters: a.Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic. b.Designating any highway as a through highway and requiring that all vehicles observe official traffic control devices before entering or crossing the highway or designating any intersection as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the intersection. C.Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of Chapter 5 of Part I of Division I of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote. r @licy\sw 11/95/ajp d.Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting automobile driver @g programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state. e.Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing. f.Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design features to implement the circulation element of a general plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division I of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local goverrunent to provide for the health and safety of its citizens. LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMIPORARELY CLOSE EEIGHWAY: C AL A VEMCLE CODE SEC77ON 21101.4 (a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for temporarily closing to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions are, after a public hearing, found to exist. 1.'Me local authority finds and determines that there is serious and continual criminal activity in the portion of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This finding and determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriff's department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol. 2.The highway has not been designated as a through highway or arterial street. 3. Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity. 4.The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emergency vehicles, the performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of freight by commercial vehicles in the area of the highway proposed to be temporarily closed. (b)A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months, except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not more than 18 months. r. \policyvw 11/95/ajp PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 7. 117IE711u= Chairman Johnson requested public comments: Isaac Lizarraga, 26875 Ynez Road, co-owner of Rancho Ford, agreed with the parking restriction, however, he requested a delay in implementation to allow Rancho Ford more time to secure additional parking. He requested the restriction be delayed till April 1, 1996. Commissioner Guerriero responded theit- an April timeline could be extreme because of the potential accident factors existing at this location. Dick Kennedy, 26755 Ynez Road, representative from Norm Reeves Group, spoke in favor of the parking restriction and recommended it become effective immediately. It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Coe to accept staff recommendation and restrict parking on Ynez Road between the northerly entrance to the Temecula Town Center and Solana Way. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Sander, Johnson NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry 4.Starlight Ridge Neighborhood Safety - Progress Report Traffic Engineer Lauber presented the proposed "Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets" for the Commission's review. This policy is being proposed to the City Council on December 12, 1995. The information will be contained in the Council Agenda Report and available to the public. PU13LIC COMMENT Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, resident of Starlight Ridge, thanked Engineer Lauber for the traffic calming ideas and all his work toward this effort. He expressed concern with the integrated approach and the implementation of these calming ideas. He also spoke in opposition to the proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Cosmic Drive and Rancho California Road. Over 200 residents in the Starlight Ridge homes have signed a petition opposing this traffic signal. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, applauded the efforts of Engineer Lauber, however, he wanted to reiterate the traffic problems that still exist in Starlight Ridge. He expressed concern that 100% of home owners signatures could not be obtained. Engineer Lauber responded that this would be considered. Commissioner Coe reported that he had driven the Starlight Ridge area and hopes it will be possible to resolve the problems soon. Traffic Engineer Lauber recommended that Agenda Item 7 - Mar-garita Road and Cara Way - Minutes.p/t. 1 2/07/95 2 AGENDA REPORT TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:February 22, 1996 SUBJECT:Item 2 Starlight Ridge - Community Traffic Calming Request RECO@NDATION: For Discussion Only BACKGROUND: On December 14, 1995 the City Council approved the City of Temecula. Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. This policy sets up the procedure for implementing citizen based requests for traffic calming measures on a neighborhood scale. After approval of the policy, a representative of the Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association (HOA) requested a meeting to discuss viable options which could be implemented on Santa Cecilia Drive and Cosmic Drive. Previous studies have indicated unacceptable speeds and approximate volumes needed to qualify these streets for attention. The initial meeting was held on January 17, 1996 at City Hall. Mr. Don Matson joined Mr. Ken Bruckman to brainstorm.ideas in order to formulate a project scope. At that meeting two (2) major issues were raised. The first item was their feelings that it was unreasonable for the citizens to finance any alternative. The second item was specific concerns for the size of the effected areas formulated for each of the potential traffic calming techniques. At the conclusion of their concerns, I informed both residents that the current policy requires funding from the proponents of the project and can not be modified without City Council approval. Tte rest of the meeting was discussion with regard to the scope of alternatives with the associated effected areas being defined. Ite option chosen was to stripe both roads with two (2) eight feet wide parking lanes, two (2) four foot bike lanes and two (2) ten foot wide through lanes. Because the City does pay for the striping of public streets, both citizens requested that staff look into funding this alternative with City funds. With the proposal defined, staff was requested to produce an associated cost estimate and clearly defme the effected area to be petitioned. Because of a pending HOA meeting set for January 23, 1996, staff agreed to meet on that day to supply the requested information. At the meeting on January 23, 1996, both HOA representatives were informed that. residential streets are not normally striped and that applying City funds to this project would not be appropriate and would set a president contrary to our approved policy. Mr. Don Matson became enraged and stormed out of the meeting. He felt that the proposed striping idea was forced on then and he found that to be unacceptable. r.% \ag@\%\0222\ftulight- qwaip I agreed that their proposed project should be exactly What our citizens want and Continued discussing options with Mr. Bruck:man. At the conclusion of that meeting staff requested a formal written proposal to be submitted to ensure that nobody was wasting anyones time on unacceptable proposals. Mr. Bruckman was invited to discuss his concerns regarding financing improvements with our Commission at the January 25, 1996 meeting. As of February 14, 1996 no letter has been received by the Department of Public Works regarding proposed traffic calming measures in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. Staff will continue to prioritize this neighborhood for both police speed enforcement and radar trailer display unit placement. F71SCAL IWACT: None Attachment: Location Map ic Dri STARLIGHT RIODGE LOCATION MAP PUBLICfrRAFFIC COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22, 1996 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Guerriero, Coe, Perry, Sander NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 2.Starlight Ridge - Community Traffic Calming Reciuest (Discussion Only) Traffic Engineer Lauber presented a summary of events and shared a letter from the Starlight Ridge Home Owners'Association. They do not offer to financially assist with the implementation of traffic calming devices and indicated they were upset to be asked. Lieutenant Domenoe reported that officers spent 1 5 hours during the month of February in the Starlight Ridge area and only issued 5 citations for speeding. He also reported the Radar trailer will be located in the neighborhood from 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. on a continuous basis. Commissioner Perry invited other Commissioners to check on this for themselves from 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. He stated that he has been there and doesn't see a problem to the extent that has been described. He also agreed to leave the trailer there for a longer period of time. Commissioner Sander stated that publicity could be the answer and to publish the speed limit as 25 MPH in residential areas. Engineer Lauber stated he has requested public information videos to educate the citizens of Temecula on speed limits in residential areas. Commissioner Guerriero asked if this could be a legal problem and could the City be challenged in court. Engineer Lauber responded that this could not be challenged. Commissioner Johnson stated that he has also visited the neighborhood and did not see a problem with excessive speeds. 3. Bedford Court - Reciuest for Traffic Signal Chairman Coe opened the Public Comment at 7:30 PM. Cynthia Arocha, 44535 Bedford Court, spoke to express support and pleasure with the proposal being submitted for the signal at Bedford Court and HWY 79S. She thanked the Public Works Department and the Commission. John Moramorco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, spoke to commend the Commission for the fine job they have been doing. Minutes.ptc.02\22\96 2 ,NPPE DI)C 66B99 CITY OF TEMECULA SOUTHER-N CROSS ROAD / WEST OF VIRGO COURT 24 HOUR SPEED COUNT DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES AUGUST 1995 co CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157012 SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCEBSP EAS Page I Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- TASDMP.THP 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 08/15 2 0 0 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 36 01:00 0 0 4 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33 6@:66 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34 03:00 2 1 4 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 26 29 04:00 0 0 2 9 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 34 05:00 0 2 3 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 28 33 06:00 0 0 5 10 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 34 07:00 0 1 5 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26 33 08:00 2 4 5 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 24 32 09:00 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 32 10:00 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 33 11:00 0 0 0 0 1 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Day Totals 7 8 34 66 64 11 2 192 28 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 07:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34 08:00 1 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34 09:00 1 0 2 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 33 10:00 3 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 28 11:00 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 33 Totals 12 11 50 82 79 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 251 Si)eed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH kverage Speed - All Vehicies 0 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 PH 95th Percentile Speed 36 KR 10 MPH Pace Speed 0-9 MPH HaMr of Vehicles in Pace 0 Percent of Vehicles in Pace .00% Nuaber of Vehicles > 55 )H 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 24 RR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- Tine 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 12:00 PM 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 12:45 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 Hour Total 2 0 0 6 4 3 0 01:00 PE 0 0 01:15 0 0 01:30 0 0 01:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 02:00 PM 1 0 02:15 0 0 02:30 0 0 02:45 0 0 Hour Total 1 0 03:00 PM 2 0 03:15 0 0 03:30 0 0 03:45 0 1 Hour Total 2 1 04:00 pi 0 0 04:15 0 0 04:30 0 0 04:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 05:15 0 1 05:30 0 1 05:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 2 06:00 pi 0 0 06:15 0 0 06:30 0 0 06.-45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 07:00 PM 0 1 07:15 0 0 07:30 0 0 07:45 0 Hour Total 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 4 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 1 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 8 3 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 1 0 2 9 9 2 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 6 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 3 10 10 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 5 6 1 0 1 4 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 10 11 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 5 6 3 2 0 909.247.6716 EASTBOUND 46- 51- 56- 61- 50 55 60 65 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Code : 157012 Start Date: 08/15/95 File I.D. TESCEBSP Page 1 TASDMP.TNP 50th 85th 999 Total Pct. Pct. 0 3 32 34 0 2 29 39 0 4 34 37 0 6 26 28 0 15 29 0 3 32 34 0 4 29 32 0 5 24 32 0 2 27 29 0 14 28 0 3 24 34 0 2 29 39 0 2 24 34 0 2 24 34 0 9 24 0 8 24 32 0 5 24 28 0 2 29 34 0 3 27 29 0 18 26 0 6 28 32 0 6 29 34 0 3 34 39 0 8 31 34 0 23 30 0 6 29 33 0 3 27 29 0 12 29 33 0 5 27 34 0 26 28 0 6 31 34 0 13 29 33 0 8 28 34 0 2 22 24 0 29 29 0 6 29 37 0 1 29 0 5 24 29 0 5 24 29 0 17 26 CITY OF TERECULA SOUTHM CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NDON WED Begin 0- 16- Time 15 20 08:00 pi 0 0 08:15 1 1 08:30 0 2 08:45 1 1 Hour Total 2 4 09:00 PM 0 0 09:15 0 0 09:30 0 0 09:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 10:00 PI 0 0 10:15 0 0 10:30 0 0 10:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 11:00 PI 0 0 11:15 0 0 11:30 0 0 11:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 Day Totals 7 8 12:00 08/116 0 0 12:15 0 0 12:30 0 0 12:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 01:00 at 0 0 01:15 0 0 01:30 0 0 01:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 02:00 at 0 0 02:15 0 0 02:30 0 0 02:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 03:00 at 0 0 03:15 0 1 03:30 0 0 03:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 25 30 35 40 45 1 1 4 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 4 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 66 64 11 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 COUNTS IJNLIMITED 909.247.6716 EASTBOUND 46- 51- 56- 61- 50 55 60 65 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Code : 157012 Start Date: 08/15/95 File I.D. TESCEBSP Page 2 TASDMP.TMP 50th 85th 999 Total Pct. Pct. 0 6 31 33 0 9 23 32 0 3 19 24 0 4 19 29 0 22 24 0 1 24 0 1 24 0 5 26 29 0 2 29 34 0 9 26 0 2 29 34 0 1 29 0 3 29 34 0 3 33 34 0 9 29 0 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 192 28 0 1 34 0 1 29 0 1 39 0 1 34 0 4 32 0 0 0 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 0 1 34 0 0 0 3 29 CITY OF TNECULA SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED Beqin 0- 16- Time 15 20 04:00 as 0 0 04:15 0 0 04:30 0 0 04:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 05:00 am 0 0 05:15 0 0 05:30 0 0 05:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 06:00 am 0 0 06:15 0 0 06:30 0 0 06:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 07:00 am 0 0 07:15 0 0 07:30 0 0 07:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 08:00 an 0 0 08:15 0 0 08:30 0 0 08:45 1 0 Hour Total 1 0 09:00 am 0 0 09:15 1 0 09:30 0 0 09:45 0 0 Hour Total 1 0 10:00 am 0 0 10:15 0 2 10:30 0 0 10:45 3 0 Hour Total 3 2 11:00 am 0 0 11:15 0 0 11:30 0 0 11:45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 Totals 12 11 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 25 30 35 40 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 5 4 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 50 82 79 15 2 COUNTS UI(LIMITED 909.247.6716 EASTBOUND 46- 51- 56- 61- 50 55 60 65 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Code : 157012 Start Date: 08/15/95 File I.D. TESCEBSP Page 3 TASDMP.7MP 50th 85th 999 Total Pct. Pct. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 1 24 0 0 0 2 22 0 0 0 1 34 0 2 29 39 0 2 22 24 0 5 24 0 2 24 39 0 0 0 5 24 28 0 2 34 0 9 24 0 2 24 34 0 7 29 33 0 1 * 24 0 3 29 39 0 13 27 0 2 24 29 0 2 17 19 0 3 29 34 0 5 24 0 12 21 0 3 29 34 0 3 24 29 0 2 32 34 0 2 24 34 0 10 27 0 251 CITY OF TEMEM COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009 SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. TESCWBSP WESTBOM Paae 1 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 08/15 0 1 2 1 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 37 01:00 0 0 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 33 01:06 0 1 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 c 12 31 36 03:00 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33 04:00 0 0 0 3 5 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 32 38 011:00 1 0 0 2 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 32 38 C,6:00 0 0 1 8 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 37 07:00 0 0 1 3 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 34 08:00 0 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 -11 34 09:00 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 29 37 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39 Day T3tals 1 2 7 31 41 57 30 5 1 175 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44 )1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 32:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44 )4:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 )5:00 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 )6.,OO 0 0 0 4 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 34 )7:00 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 33 )8:00 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 39 )9:00 0 1 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 33 @0:00 0 0 1 3 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 36 -1:00 0 0 2 2 4 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 34 'otals 1 3 12 51 65 94 43 12 1 0 0 0 0 282 ;NO Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 30 MR Average Speed - All Vehicles 30 MPH 85th Percentile speed 36 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Nuiaber of Vehicles in Pace 159 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 56.20% N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 WE: .00% CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009 SMTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. T P WESTBOUND Page 1 Beqin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85tb Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 ---50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 37 12:15 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 12:30 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 29 i 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 37 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 01:00 pill 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 01:30 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 32 01:45 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 02:00 pi 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37 02:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 02:30 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 31 03:00 pi 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 03:15 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 03:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37 04:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 39 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 04:45 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 5 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 32 05:00 pm 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 05:15 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 39 05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 '24 44 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Hour Total 1 0 0 2 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 06:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37 06:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 39 06:30 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 23 34 06:45 0 0 1 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 37 Hour Total 0 0 1 8 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 07:00 pm 0 0 0 1 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 34 07:15 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 34 07:30 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29 07:45 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 1 3 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 CITY OF TEECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009 SOUMERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUES/NOC)N WED File I.D. T P WESTBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 PE 0 0 0 3 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 34 08:15 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 08:30 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 08:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 Hour Total 0 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 31 09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 09:45 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 33 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 10:00 PE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 10:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 Day Totals 1 2 7 31 41 57 30 5 1 175 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 01:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 CITY OF @ECULA COUKS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009 SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. TE@'BSP WES7BOUND Page 3 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 06:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 06:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 06:30 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 06:45 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 07:00 an 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34 07:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 07:30 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34 07:45 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 08:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 08:15 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29 08:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 42 08:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 09:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 09:15 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22 24 09:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 '29 32 09:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Hour Total 0 1 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 10:00 as 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34 10:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 10:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 10:45 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34 Hoiz Total 0 0 1 3 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 11:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 39 11:15 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 29 11:30 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 11:45 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 2 4 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 Totals 1 3 12 51 65 94 43 12 1 0 0 0 0 282 CITY OF TEMECULA ASTEROID WAY / BETWEEN MILKEY WAY DRIVES 24 HOUR SPEED COUNT DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES AUGUST 1995 '-5424 Jccilyn A,er,@ l@o,eno %role,, 72---57 CITY OF TEMECULA COWS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016 ASTEROID WAY/BET HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEASNBSP NORTHBOUND 1 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 60 65 999 Total Pct. PCt. 12:00 08/15 1 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 36 38 01:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34 02:00 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 42 03:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 04:00 0 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 34 37 05:00 1 0 2 0 2 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 32 39 06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 39 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 39 08:00 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 39 09:00 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 38 10:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 24 44 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Day Totals 2 1 7 11 14 21 24 10 2 1 92 32 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39 06:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 39 44 08:00 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 39 09:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 38 42 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 34 Totals 3 4 10 16 23 25 37 19 3 0 0 0 0 140 Speed Statistics 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 32 MPH Average Speed - All vehicles 32 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 43 ?H 10 MPH Pace Speed 31-40 MPH NnMr of Vehicles in Pace 62 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 44.061 Number of vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% CITY- OF TEMECULA ODUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016 ASTEROID WAY/BET MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 BR SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TEASNBSP NORTHBOUND Page I Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 36 39 12:30 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 12:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Hour Total 1 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 36 01:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 01:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 02:00 pit 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 44 02:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 02:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 44 02:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 03:00 pi 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 39 04:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 39 04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36 38 04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 34 05:00 pia 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 05:15 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 34 05:30 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 '34 39 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 1 0 2 0 2 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 32 06:00 pi 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 34 06:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 07:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 CITY-OF TEMECULA COUNTS UlfLINITED Site Code : 157016 ASTEROID WAY/BET MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED file I.D. TEKSNBSP NORTHBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 PR 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44 08:30 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 09:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 09:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 09:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 37 39 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 10:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 19 49 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 44 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 24 11:00 pin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Totals 2 1 7 11 14 21 24 10 2 92 32 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 01:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CITY-OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016 ASTEROID WAY/BET HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEASNBSP NO Page 3 Bqin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 06:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 07:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 07:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 39 44 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 39 08:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44 08:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 08:30 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34 08:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 Hour Total 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 09:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44 09:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39 09:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 44 Hour Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 38 10:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 as 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 11:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 39 11:45 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 Totals 3 4 10 16 23 25 37 19 3 0 0 0 0 140 CITY OF T@U COMS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011 )-STEROID WAY/BET THE HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/MOON TUE/NOON i'ED File I.D. TFJ.SSBSP UND Page I Begin 0- 16- 21- 2E- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 081115 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 27 33 01:00 3 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33 02:00 1 2 1 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 34 03:00 0 3 2 3 4 . I L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 33 04:00 0 0 2 3 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,0 34 38 o@,:OO 2 0 1 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 31 36 06:00 0 1 5 5 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 36 07:00 C, 3 1 5 5 2 C. 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 34 03:00 0 1 C, 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 13 29 34 09:00 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 39 10:00 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 39 11:00 0 0 0 1 1 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Lay Totals 6 11 21 43 53 27 3 2 1 167 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 01:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k 03:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39 08:00 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 33 09:00 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 33 10:00 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 33 11:00 2 0 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 33 Totals 8 12 30 54 76 32 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 218 Speed Statistics 15th Percentile Sp 22 MPH Median Speed (50th Percentile): 30 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 30 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 38 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 130 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59-50% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% CITY-OF TERECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011 ASTEROID WAY/BET THE MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08@115/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/XOON WED File I.D. TFKSSBSP - SOMWUND Page I Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pi 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 12:15 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29 12:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 12:45 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 Hour Total 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 27 01:00 PM 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 01:15 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32 33 01:30 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 29 01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'k 34 Hour Total 3 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 02:00 pi 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 34 02:15 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 37 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28 Hour Total 1 2 1 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 03:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 03:15 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34 03:30 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32 03:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 Hour Total 0 3 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 04:15 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 34 39 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 37 39 04:45 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 3 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 34 05:00 PI 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 05:15 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 05:30 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 '29 37 05:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 2 0 1 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 31 06:00 PM 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 06:30 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 34 06:45 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 28 31-, Hour Total 0 1 5 5 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 07:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 07:15 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 32 07:30 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 07:45 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34 Hour Total 0 3 1 5 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 CITY- OF TERECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011 ASTEROID WAY/BET THE HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEKSSBSP SOUTHBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 PR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 32 08:45 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 37 Hour Total 0 1 0 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 29 09:00 Pt 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 09:15 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 09:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 09:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Hour Total 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 10:00 PM 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 10:15 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 49 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 Day Totals 6 11 21 43 53 27 3 2 1 167 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 39 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 01:00 at 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .29 34 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 am 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 CITY OF.TFRECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011 ASIEROID WAY/BET THE MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TUMBSP UND Pace 3 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 all 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 08:00 at 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 32 08:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 08:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 08:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 Hour Total 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 09:00 an 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 09:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 09:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -32 34 09:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 10:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 33 10:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 10:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 11:00 at 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 11:30 1 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 33 11:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 Hour Total 2 0 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 Totals 8 12 30 54 76 32 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 218 CITY OF TEMECULA COSMIC DRIVE/SOUTH OF NORTH STAR COURT 24 HOUR SPEED COUNT DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES AUGUST 1995 cc cr,- vclle, CITY OF TE14ECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006 COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIK 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TECONBSP Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Tlle 15 65 70 999. Total P 12:00 08/15 1 1 1 8 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 28 41 01:00 2 0 4 5 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 33 02:00 3 0 4 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 32 03:00 2 2 8 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 27 33 04:00 0 2 3 it 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33 05:00 1 0 8 13 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 28 33 06:00 0 0 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 33 07:00 0 2 10 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26 31 08:00 0 2 5 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 32 09:00 0 0 5 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 33 10:00 0 1 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 29 11:00 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Day Totals 9 11 54 126 82 16 7 'k 305 27 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:00 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 03:00 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 34 04:00 0 0 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 34 05:00 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 32 06:00 0 1 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33 07:00 0 0 2 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 28 32 08:00 0 1 4 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 33 09:00 0 2 5 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26 31 10:00 0 0 6 14 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28 34 11:00 0 3 1 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 34 Totals 9 21 81 207 128 29 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 SNed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 8@th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@r of Vehicles in Pace 335 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 68.87% Nuiaber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% 'CITY OF TZRECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006 COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEFD/NODN TUE/NOC)N WED File I.D. TECONBSP NORTHBOUND Page 1 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 Pt 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34 12:15 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 12:30 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 42 12:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44 Hour Total 1 1 1 8 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 28 01:00 pin 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 01:15 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 01:30 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 01:45 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37 Hour Total 2 0 4 5 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 02:00 Pt 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28 02:15 1 0 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31 02:30 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34 02:45 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 29 Hour Total 3 0 4 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 03:00 pm 2 0 3 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 33 03:15 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 22 29 03:30 0 0 0 6 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 34 03:45 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 2 2 8 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 27 04:00 pm 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 32 04:15 0 1 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34 04:30 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32 04:45 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33 Hour Total 0 2 3 18 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 05:00 PI 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33 05:15 0 0 3 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 34 05:30 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 -31 34 05:45 0 0 2 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33 Hour Total 1 0 8 13 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 28 06:00 pia 0 0 2 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 32 33 06:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 06:30 0 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33 06:45 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 28 Tour Total 0 0 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 07:00 pm 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23 32 07:15 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 28 07:30 0 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31 07:45 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 32 Hour Total 0 2 10 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26 CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006 COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECONMP NORTHBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 -40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 Po 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 34 08:15 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29 08:30 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32 08:45 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 29 Hour Total 0 2 5 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 09:00 PM 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 34 09:15 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 7 29 33 09:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 09:45 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 Hour Total 0 0 5 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 10:00 PM 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 39 10:15 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27 10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 10:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 1 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39 11:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29 Hour Total 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 Day Totals 9 11 54 126 82 16 7 305 27 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 01:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:15 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 03:00 am 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 Hour Total 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 CITY OF TERCULK MMS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006 COSMIC DR/S/o P-KNCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECONBSP NORTHBOUND Page 3 B.egin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 04:15 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 04:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 04,.45 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 Hour Total 0 0 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 05:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 05:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 05:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 05:45 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 06:00 am 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29 06:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 06:30 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 06:45 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 28 Hour Total 0 1 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 07:00 am 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29 07:15 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29 07:30 0 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 34 07:45 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 29 Hour Total 0 0 2 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 28 08:00 am 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34 08:15 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 33 08:30 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 08:45 0 1 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 29 Hour Total 0 1 4 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 09:00 an 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 32 09-15 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26 28 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 '29 39 09:45 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 0 2 5 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26 10:00 an 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32 10:15 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 37 10:30 0 0 2 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 33 10:45 0 0 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 34 Hour Total 0 0 6 14 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28 11:00 am 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29 11:15 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 11:30 0 3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 33 11:45 0 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 38 Hour Total 0 3 1 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 Totals 9 21 81 207 128 29 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 COU"S UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001 CITY OF TEMECULA COSMIC DR/S/0 WCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TOE/NOON WED File I.D. TE,@BSP ;OMIMOUND I Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 11- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Tive - 15 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total.,,, Pct. Pct. 12:00 08/15 2 0 11 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 32 01:00 1 1 3 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33 02:00 0 4 8 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26 29 03:00 0 1 8 24 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 39 27 29 04:00 1 1 9 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 27 34 05:00 1 1 15 20 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 54 27 34 06:00 0 1 5 16 5 6 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 36 07:00 1 2 11 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 24 33 08:00 2 4 8 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 14 26 29 09:00 1 4 5 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 32 10:00 0 0 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33 11:00 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 37 Day Totals 10 20 87 155 59 32 3 366 27 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 01:00 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 02:00 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34 03:00 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22 34 04:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 05:00 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 33 06:00 0 0 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 32 07:00 2 0 5 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 33 08:00 0 2 11 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26 31 09:00 0 2 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 32 10:00 2 0 6 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 27 33 11:00 0 1 7 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 26 28 Totals 15 29 125 227 89 42 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 531 SReed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 27 "H 85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 21-30 MPH N@ of Vehicles in Pace 352 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.28% NuEber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 .001 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MR: CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001 COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TECOSBSP SOUTHBOUND Page I Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pm 0 0 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31 12:15 0 0 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 32 12:30 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 24 12:45 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22 29 Hour Total 2 0 11 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 01:00 PE 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 01:15 0 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 39 01:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 01:45 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 29 Hour Total 1 1 3 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 02:00 ps 0 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32 02:15 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 27 02.-30 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 24 02:45 0 3 1 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 29 Hour Total 0 4 8 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26 03:00 pi 0 0 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 29 03:15 0 1 2 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 29 03:30 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32 03:45 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 29 Hour Total 0 1 8 24 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 27 04:00 pi 0 1 3 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26 29 04:15 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 34 04:30 0 0 4 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 34 04:45 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34 Hour Total 1 1 9 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 27 05:00 pm 0 1 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34 05:15 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23 28 05:30 0 0 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 -29 34 4 17 36 05:45 1 0 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Hour Total 1 1 15 20 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 27 6 06:00 pi 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29 06:15 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 38 06:30 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 06:45 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 34 Hour Total 0 1 5 16 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 07:00 pi 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34 07:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 07:30 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 37 07-.45 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 32 Hour Total 1 2 11 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 24 CITY Gf TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001 Cdsmic DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEEDINOOK TUE/NOOK WED File I.D. TECOSBSP SOUTHBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 Ps 1 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34 08:15 1 1 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 29 08:30 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 28 08:45 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 34 Hour Total 2 4 8 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26 09:00 pin 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 29 09:15 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 29 09:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 09:45 1 1 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 29 Hour Total 1 4 5 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 10:00 PM 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32 10:15 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 10:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 10:45 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 11:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 11:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 11:30 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 24 11:45 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 Hour Total 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 Day Totals 10 20 87 155 59 32 3 366 27 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 12:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 01:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 19 01:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hoiz Total 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 02:00 an 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 02:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 Hour Total 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 03:00 am 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 03:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 03:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 03:45 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 24 Hour Total 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22 CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001 CDSHIC DR/S/0 WCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECOSBSP - so Page 3 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 05:00 am 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 05:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 06:00 am 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 06:45 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 07:00 am 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 37 07:15 1 0 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33 07:30 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 28 07:45 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34 Hour Total 2 0 5 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 08:00 am 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 28 08:15 0 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34 08:30 0 1 4 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 27 31 08:45 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 32 Hour Total 0 2 11 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26 09:00 am 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 09:15 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34 09:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 24 09:45 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29 Hour Total 0 2 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 10:00 am 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34 10:15 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29 10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 29 10:45 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34 Hour Total 2 0 6 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 27 11:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 11:15 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 11:30 0 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 28 11:45 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29 Hour Total 0 1 7 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 26 Totals 15 29 125 227 89 42 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 531 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENA STREET / WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE 24 HOUR SPEED COUNT DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES AUGUST 1995 CITY-OF TEHECUU COUNTS UlfLIMITED Site Code : 15700-i AGENA STNMT OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TUGEBSP WTBOUND Page Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th 12:00 pm 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 01:00 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28 02:00 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 33 03:00 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 27 04:00 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 42 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 42 43 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 42 43 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 42 44 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 42 44 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43 Day Totals 4 4 6 12 4 1 72 103 41 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43 10:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 42 11:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 Totals 0 4 4 7 15 5 2 101 0 0 0 0 0 138 Si>eed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 27 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 41 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 38 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 43 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 44 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 36-45 MPH Nuber of Vehicles in Pace 103 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 74.101 Nimber of Vehicles ) 55 KH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% CUUN,6 UhLiMii@ED Site Coae : 157uO',, AGENA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGEBSP FASTBOUND Page Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 01:00 Ps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 24 01:30 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 27 01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 02:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 02:30 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 02:45 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 03:00 pi 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 29 03:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 03:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:15 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29 04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 05:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 06:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 42 07:00 pa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 'k 44 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 42 CITI OF TE14ECUiA COURTS UhLiHiiEi) 61te Cooe : i@', UL) / AGE'NA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGEBSP EASTBOUND Page Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85tb Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 42 09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 42 43 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 42 11:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 Day Totals 4 4 6 12 4 1 72 103 41 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 12:45 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 .43 44 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 03:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,-III ut lLML@u@ CUUNI@ UhLiMi@@ 3iLe (-O(le : i@ivu; AGENA ST/WEST Of COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOC)N TUE/NOON WED file I.D. TEAG@P EASTBOUND Page 3 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 05:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 07:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 08:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 09:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43 09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 44 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 10:00 an 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44 10:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 11:00 at 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 11:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 Totals 0 4 4 7 15 5 2 101 0 0 0 0 0 138 AGENA ST/MT OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/M TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGWBSP WESTBOUND Page I Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50rtb 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pa 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32 01:00 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 37 02:00 0 0 2 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 28 03:00 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 c 10 26 34 04:00 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32 05:00 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 29 06:00 0 0 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 33 07:00 1 3 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 28 08:00 1 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 10 23 28 09:00 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 27 10:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 11:00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 Day Totals 2 6 8 30 36 13 4 1 100 25 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 19 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 08:00 0 0 0 4 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 36 09:00 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 34 10:00 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 32 11:00 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 24 Totals 2 7 9 46 47 19 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 139 SDee statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 20 MPH Median Speed (50rth percentile): 26 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 26 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 21-30 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 93 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.51% Nwaber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% Cill @i L@CULA cuuhlb UNLimiiLv @ite LOGE : iD/ju@ kGtNA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGWBSP - WESTBOUND Page I Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 12:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 Hour Total 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 01:00 PE 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 37 01:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 29 01:30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 02:00 pt 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 39 02:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 02:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 02:45 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 28 Hour Total 0 0 2 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 03:00 pm 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 03:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 03:30 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 03:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 04:00 pm 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 04:15 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 05:00 pie 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 05:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 05:30 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 .27 28 05:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 34 Hour Total 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 06:00 PI 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 06:45 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 24 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 07:00 pa 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 07:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 24 07:30 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 24 07:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 Hour Total 3 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 ITY Of TEHECULA GENA ST/WEST OF COSHIC STREET @4 HR SpEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED o- 11- 16- lime 18:00 pi 1 0 0 )8:15 0 0 0 )8:30 0 1 0 )9:00 Pla 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 1 09:30 0 0 0 19-45 0 0 H, Total 0 0 1 10:00 PE 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10,45 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 11:00 pia 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 1 Day Totals 2 6 a 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 . 5 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 01:00 at 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 02:00 at 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 03:00 aii 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 1 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 Hour Total 0 1 1 36- 21- 26- 31- 5 30 35 40 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 30 36 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 909.247.6716 COURTS UNLINITED 41- 46- 51- 56- 45 50 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ " -11@ . @-;,-- Start Date: 08 ' /15!95 File I.D. TEAGWBSP Page . - 2 61- 66- 50th 85th 65 999 0 0 3 24 29 0 0 1 24 0 0 4 24 27 0 0 10 23 0 0 0 2 19 29 0 0 1 29 0 5 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 0 2 22 0 0 0 2 24 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 100 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 CITY Uf 'iLHL(-ULA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/115/95 AGENA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET File I.D. TEAGWBSP 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED 3 Bqin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th 9 Total Pct. Pct. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 our 0 05:00 aa 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 06:00 aN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 08:00 am 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 08:30 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 37 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 09:00 air 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 09:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 09:30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 0 0 0 0 09: - 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 10,00 as 0 0 0 1 10:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 10:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 11:00 av 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24 11:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 0 0 0 0 94 11:45 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 Totals 2 7 9 46 47 19 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 139 CITY OF TEMECULA SANTA CELILIA DRIVE / SOUTH OF AGENA STREET 24 HOUR SPEED COUNT DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES AUGUST 1995 co 2542/ Jac@yn A,e@,,c CITY OF TEMECULA coMS LTHLINITED Site Code : 157008 SANTA CELILIk/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15)195 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/KOON WED File I.D. TESCNBSP NO Page 1 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 30 35 40 45 - 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 08/15 1 0 2 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 38 01:00 2 0 1 7 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 28 37 02:00 0 0 0 9 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 36 03:00 0 0 5 15 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 36 04:00 0 0 6 7 9 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 32 39 05:00 0 1 5 6 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31. 37 06:00 0 0 0 6 9 2 0 1 0 c 0 G. 0 15 31 34 07:00 0 0 4 12 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 29 34 08:00 0 0 0 4 4 10 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 21 36 39 09:00 0 1 2 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 37 10:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 39 11:00 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 c c 0 5 29 34 Day Totals 3 2 25 74 82 56 9 3 2 1 1 258 31 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 49 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 04:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 34 05:00 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 34 39 06:00 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34 07:00 0 0 0 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 37 08:00 0 1 1 7 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 32 38 09:00 0 0 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 37 10:00 0 0 2 5 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 32 38 11:00 0 0 0 3 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 33 39 Totals 3 3 30 101 126 89 16 5 2 1 0 0 1 377 SRND Statistics ' 15th Percentile S@ 26 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 32 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 32 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 38 K?ff 95th Percentile Speed 42 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 227 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.22% NuMr of Vehicles ) 55 MPH 1 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .27% CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008 SAKA CELILIA/S/0 AGEM 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOOM TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCNBSP NORTHBOUND Page I Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 PM 1 0 0 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 38 12:15 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34 12:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 1 0 2 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 01:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34 01:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 01:30 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 28 34 01:45 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29 Hour Total 2 0 1 7 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 28 02:00 pi 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 28 02:15 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 37 02:30 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 02:45 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 9 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 03:00 PM 0 0 3 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 33 03:15 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 34 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39 03:45 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 5 15 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 04:00 PM 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 38 04:15 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 43 04:30 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 04:45 0 0 2 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 31 38 Hour Total 0 0 6 7 9 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 32 05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 33 38 05:15 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 38 05:30 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 '29 33 05:45 0 0 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 38 Hour Total 0 1 5 6 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 39 06:15 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 06:30 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34 06:45 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 6 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 31 07:00 PM 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 34 07-15 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 31 33 07:30 0 0 1 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 36 07:45 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34 Hour Total 0 0 4 12 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 29 CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008 S@A CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/195 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. T P NO@UND 2 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 PR 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 38 08:15 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 08:30 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 34 52 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 37 38 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 4 10 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 21 36 09:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 24 09:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 09:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44 09:45 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 10:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 39 10:15 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34 10:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 34 11:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 11:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 11:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 Day Totals 3 2 25 74 82 56 9 3 2 1 1 258 31 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 49 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 as 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008 SAITA CELILIA/S/0 A(;ENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15 ' /95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESMP NORTHBOUND Page 3 Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k A 04:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 04:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 05:45 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 34 06:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 07:00 an 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 07:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 07:45 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 08:00 am 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 34 39 08:15 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 29 08:30 0 0 1 2 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 38 08:45 0 0 0 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 42 Hour Total 0 1 1 7 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 32 09:00 am 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28 09:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 09:30 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 '29 34 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Hour Total 0 0 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 10:00 as 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 34 38 10:15 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37 1 1 3 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 34 38 10:45 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 5 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 32 11:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 11:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 11:30 0 0 0 2 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 33 38 11:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 33 Totals 3 3 30 101 126 89 16 5 2 1 0 0 1 377 CITY OF TEFICULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157015 SUTA CELILIk/S/0 AGENK 909.247.6716 Start Date- 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP - so Page I Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 pt plir 0 0 0 2 10 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 28 34 01:00 0 0 1 1 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 31 34 02:00 0 0 2 8 10 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 33 03:00 0 0 0 5 9 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 31 36 04:00 0 0 0 3 10 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 30 36 05:00 0 C, 0 2 11 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 30 34 06:00 0 0 0 5 a 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 28 34 07:00 0 0 0 3 16 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33 08:00 0 0 1 1 4 12 1 0 0 0 0 c 24 32 37 09:00 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 32 39 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 37 39 11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 Day Totals 4 32 83 89 30 9 1 1 1 ir 250 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44 54 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 33 39 07:00 0 0 0 1 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 31 37 08:00 0 0 0 9 20 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 30 35 09:00 0 0 0 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33 11:00 0 0 2 0 9 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 31 37 Totals 0 0 6 47 131 144 56 12 2 2 1 0 0 401 SR2ed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 25 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 30 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 31 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 275 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 68.411 N@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 1 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .251 CITY OF'TfXECULk COUNTS UlfLIMITED Site Code : 157015 SAkk CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TESCSBSP SOUTEBOUND Page I Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 PM 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 29 12:15 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 37 12:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 10 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 28 01:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44 01:15 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 44 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 31 02:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34 02:15 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 28 02:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29 02:45 0 0 0 4 3 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 34 Hour Total 0 0 2 8 10 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 03:00 PM 0 0 0 5 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 31 37 03:15 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 03:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 39 03:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 32 Hour Total 0 0 0 5 9 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 31 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 34 04:15 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 04:30 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37 04:45 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 10 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 .0 27 30 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 39 05:15 0 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 34 05:30 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33 05:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 11 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 30 06:00 pii 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29 06:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 06:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 37 06:45 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 24 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 5 8 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 28 07:00 pt 0 0 0 1 8 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33 07:15 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 07:30 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32 07:45 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 3 16 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 CITY OF TLXCULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157015 SANTA CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 081/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP SOUTHBOUND Page 2 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 08:00 Pt 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 37 08:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 39 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 34 08:45 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 4 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 32 09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 09:45 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 32 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 32 10:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36 38 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 34 49 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 37 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 11:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 Day Totals 4 32 83 89 30 9 1 1 1 250 30 12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 01:00 at 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 0 1 * 34 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 * Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 02:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44 54 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44 03:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 CITY Of TEMECULA COUI(TS UNLIKITED Site Code : 157015 SAKTA CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95 24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP UND Page 3 Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct. 04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 06:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 33 07:00 as 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 07:15 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37 07:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34 07:45 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 37 Hour Total 0 0 0 1 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 31 08:00 am 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 33 08:15 0 0 0 4 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34 08:30 0 0 0 4 9 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31 34 08:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 38 Hour Total 0 0 0 9 20 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 '0 63 30 09:00 an 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 28 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 Hour Total 0 0 0 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 10:00 an 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 10:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:45 0 0 0 0 2 27 29 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 11:00 ax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 11:30 0 0 0 0 5 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 38 11:45 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 39 Hour Total 0 0 2 0 9 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 31 Totals 0 0 6 47 131 144 56 12 2 2 1 0 0 401 CWHTS UNLIKITED Site 152509 CM OF TENECCIA Start!Date': 03@20/96 COSHICIBET TWILIG7ET & Kom STAR 909.247.6716 7 DkY COM File i,.D. '; TECDSNB NO"MU)FD Bqin 0- 6- II- !6- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- EOtb *51t 713- 5 10 15 20 25 31 otal I 12:00 03/20 01.00 02:00 03:00 k 04:00 k 05:00 t 06:00 07:00 k i k k kl k 08:00 ki k 09:00 k t k *1 k 10:00 12:00 PR k 01:00 02:00 k i 03:00 04:00 0 0 0 5 5 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 2611 @32 05:00 0 0 2 2 9 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 30 26 ;33 06:00 0 1 3 0 4 15 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 133 07:00 0 0 0 3 3 7 a 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 @34 08:00 0 0 1 2 3 3 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 21 36 09:00 0 0 1 0 4 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 131 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 34 11:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4 32 34 13 30 50 55 19 11 177 Day Totals 1 7 11 Totals 0 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 0 0 0 0 177 statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 21 m Hedian Speed (50th percentile): 23 PE Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 M 85th Percentile 34 KPH 95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH 10 KPH Pace 26-35 M Nwiber of Vehicles in Pace 105 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59.99% N@ of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MN: .001 2 '36ed @099126606, u'OJA weo-7:9 sing, CITY OF TEECUL& CDUNTS UNLIMITED Site 152',C,@ COSKIC,IBET TWILIGET BORTH STAR 909-247.6716 3tart D@,t,: 03/21/96 7 DiY COUNT File @ .D. TECOSNB D 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- th 85th Ti:ie 5 10 35 40 Total 12:00 03/21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 29 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 ;34 04:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 29@ 39 05:00 0 0 0 2 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 29 06:00 0 0 0 0 5 16 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 271 @29 07:00 0 0 0 2 6 9 a 2 1 0 0 0 0 2a 231 134 08:00 0 0 1 2 5 18 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 @4 ju: 09,.OO 0 0 0 1 2 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 311 134 10:00 0 0 1 3 6 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 21 24 .33 11:00 0 0 1 2 6 14 3 1 0 0 a 0 0 27 26! 129 12:00 pi 0 0 0 3 A a 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 30 29@ 01:00 0 0 0 2 5 10 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 28 291 33 02:00 0 0 0 1 1 6 la 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 ;34 03:00 0 0 0 1 12 14 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 28 133 04,00 0 0 0 1 6 12 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 37 291 133 05:00 0 0 0 2 4 11 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 44 311 34 06:00 0 0 0 1 7 11 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 23 J33 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 134 08:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 31@ '133 09:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 16 31@ 136 10:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 311 @37 11,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 32, @33 Day Totals 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 1 493 29; Totals 0 0 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 0 0 1 499 Spged Statistics, 15th Percentile 22 MPH Median (50th percentile): 29 MPH Average @ - All Vehicles 29 MPH 85tb Percentile S@ 33 )H 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH of Vehicles in Pace 344 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 69.061 N@-r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% a6ed "09il-726606, -Oli eot7:g 966L 'LL itidy Aepsjnqi C17Y IOF TDMULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site @ode : 152503 MMIC/BET TWILIGEIT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 Start@Date: 03@22/96 File @.D.@: T@SNB DiY COUNT NORTI[BOUND 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- Tille 5 10 15 35 40 45 -50 55 60 999 T 12:00 03/22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 a 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a3:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 133 06:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 24 291 116 0 0 58 281 @33 08:00 0 0 2 1 6 23 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 31 281 33 09:00 0 0 0 2 8 8 11 2 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 31@ 34 II.:OO 0 0 0 4 5 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 38 291 134 12:00 pii 0 0 3 1 8 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 38 271 33 01:00 0 0 0 1 4 a 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 32 02:00 0 0 1 0 6 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 33 03:00 0 0 0 2 10 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 281 ;32 04:00 0 0 1 3 7 14 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 39 29 34 05:00 0 0 1 0 6 11 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 291 @34 06:00 0 0 1 1 6 14 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 36 34 07:00 0 0 1 4 1 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 10 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 34 4 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 31! 34 09:00 0 0 0 2 1 1 10:00 0 0 1 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 132 11:00 0 0 0 11 321 33 Day Totals 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 549 281 Totals 0 0 11 26 93 184 179 4@ 7 0 0 0 0 549 15th Percentile Speed 22 MP]i Median Speed (5M percentile): 28 WU .kverage Speed - AU Vehicles 29 XPH $5th Percentile 33 WR 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH -35 MPH 10 KM Pace S@ : 26 Nuiber of vehicles in Pace : 363 Percent of vehicles in Pace : 66.00% of Vehicles > 55 PH : 0 Percent of VeEcles > 55 MR: .001 '7O9ii'i26606, LUOJJ weo-,:g 966@ j v Alp'sllq, COUNTS UNLIMITED Site (.ode 1: l@2508 CITY OF TWCULA Start Date I : 031/23/96 @IC/Brr TWILIGHR & NORTIF STAR 909.247.6716 Fila- I.D.@-- 7@@COSI[B 7 DAY COUNT Bqin n- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- $Oth 85th Tise 5 10 15 20 25 '10 35 40 45 50 55 60 @99 Total @ct. 12:00 03/23 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 @29 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 371 139 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 34 :37 05:,)O 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 ;39 06:00 0 0 0 2 1 7 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 22 31@ @37 0 0 0 3 6 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 29 @33 07:00 271 : 08:00 0 0 0 3 4 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 27 132 09:00 0 0 0 2 12 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 211 33 10:00 0 0 3 4 a 18 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 27, 32 11:00 0 0 0 4 6 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 34 12:00 pii 0 0 0 4 17 13 15 1 0 a 0 0 0 50 26@ 01:00 0 0 0 4 6 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 49 23 @33 02:00 0 0 1 4 8 20 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 271 32 03:00 0 0 2 12 3 8 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 231 32 04:00 0 0 a 6 12 20 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 59 271 132 46 261 129 05:00 0 0 0 10 9 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 06:00 0 0 1 7 9 11 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 36 25 !34 07:00 0 0 1 5 4 11 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 38 28 133 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 17 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 28, 33 09:00 0 a 2 1 3 3 a 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 30, 34 10:00 0 0 0 2 4 3 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 13 33 11:00 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 10 28 @34 Day Totals k 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 t 656 27 Totals 0 0 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 0 0 0 0 656 s@ statistics. 15th Percentile 20 MPH Median @- (50th percentile): 27 HPH Average Speed - All VehLicles 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 MR Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @er of Vehicles in Pace 398 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.58% Nuitber of Vebicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vebicles > 55 PH: .001 P.-- 13 @j LI -L I W I -1 @ abed @099-726606, ujojj wEC'i:g 966L 'LL 1L-,dv Ap@11,14 cm or TEMUU COUNTS UNLIMITED Site @ode : 15@8 COS)IIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start@Date: 03'/24/96 7 DAY COUNT File @.D.@: TTCOSNB NORT@D 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- oth 8@tb 10 25 2@ 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 lotal pct. 12:00 03/24 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 ;29 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32 02,00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 291 39 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 !34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 39 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ; 06:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26; @23 07:00 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ' 4 1 !32 08.00 0 0 0 1 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 :19 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33 10:00 0 0 0 3 7 9 a 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 36 11:00 0 1 0 0 5 12 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 @32 12:DO pm 0 0 0 A 6 6 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 @33 01:00 0 0 0 3 2 16 16 6 0 0 1) 0 0 43 30 @34 1 02:00 0 0 1 1 5 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 271 133 44 231 !33 03'.00 0 0 0 4 7 15 15 3 0 G 0 0 0 1 i 04:00 0 0 1 0 12 13 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 47 29 @33 05:00 0 0 1 4 12 12 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 26, ;32 06:00 0 0 0 5 7 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 271 :33 07:00 0 0 0 5 7 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 08:00 0 0 0 1 6 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 25 281 34 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 271 32 10:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 _29! 34 Day Totals 1 472 27 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 Totals 0 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 0 0 0 0 472 15ti Percentile Speed mediaii speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH Average S@ - AU Vehicles 29 )M 85th Percentile S@ 33 RPH 95tlk Percentile Speed 36 MPH io !TH Pace Sp---A- 26-35 VU @r of Vehicles in Pace 307 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 64.901 Mu@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00t 3 -L I W I -1 t@ i-, kD -D 9 abed 1098'7Z6606, IUOJ@ lue0@:9 966L 'LL dv A.Ps"14- CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UI(LINITFD site ode : I:)2503 MSHIC/BET TWILIG]rr NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start I)ate: 03,/25/96 7 DAY COUNT File D.I: T4cosNB KR page 1: I &gin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @Kothl g@th Ti*e 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Total pct. ct. 12:00 03/25 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 2 24 129 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29. 139 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 : 139 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 129 05.00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 137 06:00 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 34 07:00 0 0 0 0 8 9 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 36 30 134 08:00 0 0 1 1 9 19 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 50 28@ 133 09:00 0 0 1 0 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 32 10:00 0 0 0 1 2 9 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 20 2$; 136 U:00 0 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 28 132 12:00 pa 0 0 0 3 13 5 10 4 a 0 0 0 0 35 2?@ 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 271 134 02:00 0 0 0 0 7 a 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 281 136 03:00 0 0 0 0 5 19 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 291 133 04:00 0 0 2 2 2 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 28! 33 05:00 0 0 0 3 8 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26@ 31 14 28 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 36 08:00 0 0 0 0 6 6 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 24 29@@ 34 09:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 241 139 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 !34 11:00 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Totals 4 12 8" 151 120 39 2 415 28@@ Totals 0 0 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 0 0 0 0 410 Speed Statistics, 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH ?fedian Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPff 85th Percentile speed 33 .4PH 95th Percentile 37 MPH 10 @ Pace Speed 26-35 KPH N@ of Vehicles in Pace : 271 Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 65.141 N@r of Vehicles > 55 RH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 I(PH: DO% ci@-L i w r -imn s-LNnoo / abed -- @099726606, UJOJJ uJeO@:V 966L 'L It /1,P@lllq I CITY DF TEMULA COG)(TS C)FLIMITED site @ode! @2508 COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH S?.kR 909.247.6716 Start t.,;: 013'/26196 7 DAY ODLTNT File D.'. ICOSNB Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- Oth! 8 th Tige 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total ct.! Pct. 12.-OO 03/26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 291 1;34 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22@ 24 05:00 0 0 1 0 2 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29' 33 06:00 0 0 0 0 6 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 26. 32 07,00 0 0 2 1 3 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 281 33 08:00 0 0 0 2 5 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 34 28 33 09:00 0 0 0 4 2 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 281 133 10:00 0 0 0 1 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 @33 11:00 0 1 0 0 6 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 23 281 !34 12:00 pi 0 0 1 2 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 27! 113 01:00 0 0 1 0 5 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33 02:00 0 0 3 4 a 16 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 47 27. 134 03:00 0 0 0 4 2 19 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 23 133 04:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 23 31@ @37 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26 05:00 0 0 1 3 7 6 06:00 0 1 0 1 a 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 27@ ;13 07:00 0 0 0 0 4 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 129 08:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 133 09:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 31! 37 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27. 29 ll,,OO 0 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19@ 129 Day Totals 2 9 24 go 145 119 30 3 2 414 25:; Totals 0 2 9 24 go 145 119 30 3 2 0 0 0 414 Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 21 xn m6an @ (50th percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - ill VebLicles 28 PR 95th Percentile 33 MPH 95th Percentile @ed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 )M @r of Vehicles in Pace 264 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 63.611 of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH., .001 a6ed 10913-726606, -OJA w-0-1:2 966t 't CITY OF TEMECULL COUNTS U)(LIMTF.D Site 0 15@a CMECIBET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Starl Date. 0'3/27/@6 7 DkY COU]rr File I.D.1 TE6WB NORTHBOUND Paw_ 11 Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50 95th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct@ P,Ct. 12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 k 29 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 05-00 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 34 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 33 07:00 0 0 0 3 4 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 27, 33 08:00 0 0 2 1 10 18 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 47 2? 33 0 12 27 36 09:00 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 10 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 36 11:00 0 0 1 2 3 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 27 32 12.00 pi 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33 OL:DO 0 0 0 1 4 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 21 28 34 02.00 0 0 3 1 8 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 33 21, 33 03.00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 23 Totals 0 1 6 10 49 109 80 24 3 0 0 0 0 281 Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Redian Speed (50th percentile): 2a MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 M 95th Percentile Si>eed 33 WH 95th Percutile S@ 37 HPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vebicles in Pace 189 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.02t Nuiiber of Vehicles > 55 NM 0 Percent of '@ehicles 55 MPH: .001 aD-L,wi7Nn s-LNnoo 6 ared -- 709SIZ6606, WOJJ weol:g 966L ILL lljdv Aepsin4- CITY or i@u COUNTS UNLIKITED @ite C@ : 152502 @smiCliET TWILIRHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 @tar@ Date: 03/20)196 7 DAY SPRED SUR7E7i File I.D.1 TECO@-BPI SOUT.QBOUND a - I 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 5ct4 95th Tite 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Totil Pct.. Pct. 12:00 03 20 01:00 02:00 k k 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 t 07:00 03:00 09:00 t 10:00 12:00 p-k' oi:oo ! 02:00 t 03:00 04:00 0 0 0 3 14 21 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 26' 32 05:00 0 0 0 5 13 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 33 06:00 0 1 0 5 8 19 is 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 21 33 07:00 1 0 1 0 1 2 10 & 3 0 0 0 0 1 9 21 34 08:00 0 0 1 5 7 12 & 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 09:00 0 0 0 2 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 10:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 2i 37 II.-OO 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 34 Day Totals 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 1 2 2 2 Totals 0 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 Statistics, 15th Percentile Speed 21 UK Median percentile): 27 KPH Average All Vehicles 28 KPB 85th Percentile Speed 33 PYH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@ of Vehicles in Pace 152 Percent of vehicles !it Pace 60.281 @r of Vehicles > 55 M 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 a3llWl-lNn sinnoo 2 a6ed -- 1099'7Z6606, wojj wezo:LL 966L L l@jdv /,epsinq- CITY OF'TEK@ 5 UNLIMITED te Code : 152532 @C/@ET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 art Date: 03/21/96 7 D&Y SPEED SURV[71 i SOUTHBOUND KN in 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 50tji 8 5 t) 61- Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@l @t Dct. 12.00 Oj]21 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 ol-oo I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2q 34 06:00 0 0 0 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 23 33 33 07:00 1 0 0 1 0 7 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 08:00 0 0 0 0 5 26 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 13 09:00 0 0 0 3 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 32 10:00 0 0 1 0 2 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33 11:00 0 0 1 4 4 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 32 12:00 0 0 1 1 5 13 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 34 oi:oo 0 0 1 5 2 13 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 @3 27 34 02:00 0 0 1 1 10 13 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 @9 27 3 4 28 33 03:00 0 0 0 3 4 23 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 2 4 22 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 @7 21 34 D5:DO 0 0 0 1 11 22 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 28 33 0 0 0 0 2 a 25 16 4 0 6:00 . 0 0 0 0 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 33 08:00 0 0 1 2 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 32 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 31 U:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29 Day To s 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 5@2 2 Totals 0 0 7 28 ag 243 190 35 1 0 0 a 0 52 S@tistics. 15th Percentile S@ 22 MPH Median S@ (50th percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 35th Percentile Speed 33 MM 95th Percentile 36 RH -35 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26 of Vehicles in Pace 433 f Vehicles in Pace 73.02% Percent o X@r of Vehicles > 55 MP[[ 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 cr3-L i w i -iNn s-L"no3 @6ed -- '70913@26606, -0@4 -e2O:LL 966L L ILdv A.P@1,4i CITY OF TEMECULA COCKS UNLIMITEU Site Code@: l@2502 @IC/BET -TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start:Date: 03/22/96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. T!rllosBpl 41- 46- 51- 56- 35th 45 50 12:00 03 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 32 Ol-.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @l 24 03,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 34 05.00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 241 29 06:00 0 0 0 0 4 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 @7 27 34 07:00 0 0 0 0 6 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 Zi 281 33 oa:oo 0 0 0 0 9 20 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 @7 2 '@. 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 a 0 0 0 0 231 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 32 11:00 0 0 0 0 5 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 291 33 12:00 pit 0 0 0 2 11 12 10 0 0 0 0 1) 1 316 27: 32 01:00 0 0 0 4 3 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33 02:00 0 0 0 3 a 19 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 03:00 0 0 0 4 9 27 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32 0 0 0 4 27; 32 04-,OO 0 0 1 2 9 20 11 1 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 1 5 25 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 34 06:00 0 0 0 3 12 26 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 @6 281 33 07,00 0 0 0 3 6 15 12 2 0 0 0 0 2@ 33 08:00 0 0 1 4 3 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 27 32 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 10 a 0 0 G 0 0 27 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 10 4 0 0 G 0 0 27 31 ii-oo 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 Day Totals 1 2 30 112 218 176 32 1 1 6( 2 2@ Totals 0 0 2 30 112 248 176 32 1 0 0 0 1 6( 2 St tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 KPH Median (50th percentile): 28 MPII Average Speed - )dl Vehicles 28 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed : 36 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 KPH @r of Vehicles in Pace : 424 Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 70.41% N@ of Vehicles > 55 RPS 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% C[3-LIWI-INn SINNOO '7 a6ed -- @099@Z6606, UIOJJ Lue2o:@L 966L LL I[jdv Aepsinu CITY OF TD=U COOTS UNLIMITED 02 CMAIC/BET TWILIGHT NONH STAR 909.247.6716 3/@6 7 DAY SPEED SURIEY SBPI 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 25- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 5 10 15 25 3 5 60 9 " T@ 12: N 03/23 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 241 32 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 34 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 34 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@@ 32 2 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 6 29 37 07:00 0 0 0 2 3 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 28 33 08,00 0 0 0 3 7 10 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 20 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 a 2q 33 10:00 0 0 0 2 3 11 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 @4 24 @3 11:00 0 0 1 1 2 18 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 11 2g 33 12:00 pd I 0 0 0 1 6 14 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 @5 28 33 01:00 I 0 0 1 4 6 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32 02:00 0 0 0 2 6 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 32 03:00 0 0 1 2 8 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33 04:00 0 0 0 1 13 20 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 27 32 05:00 0 0 0 1 11 16 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 @3 20 @3 06:00 0 0 0 2 8 19 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 8 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 @7 21 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 6 12 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33 og:oo 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 5 a 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 36 io:oo 0 0 0 1 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 33 ii*oo 0 0 0 0 2 4 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 3 34 Day Tota Is 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 6 6 2@ Totals 0 0 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 0 0 0 0 6 6 @tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPff Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 KPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 HPII 85th Flexcentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@r of Vehicles in Pace 427 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 69.21% ff@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: Oot a2i-L iw i -i"n s-LNnoo abed 99'7Z6606, WOJA LUUZD:LL 966L ,L I L@dV Ap5;,nqi CITY OF TENECUU COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite'C@ : t52502 COSMIC/B.LIT TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 @tar@ Date: 03/24/96 7 DAY SNED SURVEY @ile @I.D.1 : TEMSBPI i SOBTRBIYJND 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- a5th Tie 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totil Pct.' Pf-t. 12:00 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 34 2 29 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 U4;VU 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 29 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 34 06:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 37 07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33 08:00 0 0 0 2 8 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @3 26 32 09:00 0 0 0 1 5 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @g 27 32 IO:W 0 0 0 2 4 16 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 @1 28 32 11:00 0 0 1 4 8 16 a 1 1 a 0 0 0 9 27 32 12:00 olk@ 0 0 0 1 7 20 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 23 32 01:00 0 0 0 5 9 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 @7 26 32 02:00 0 0 0 1 10 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 @0 26 32 03:00 0 0 0 0 9 24 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 32 04.00 0 0 0 3 5 20 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 @1 21 32 05:00 0 0 0 3 8 15 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 @0 27 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 6 19 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 )0 21 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 Li 23 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33 2 2 08:00 0 0 0 2 7 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 34 11:00 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: 33 Day Tota ; -Is 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 5 @8 27 Totals 0 0 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 0 0 0 0 5 15th Percentile 22 MM @an Speed (5= percentile): 27 9H Average All Vehicles 28 MM 85th Percentile Speed 33 HPII 95th Percentile Speed 35 KM 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@r of Vehicles in Pace 405 Percent of Vekicles in Pace 68.76t of Vebicles ) 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 XPH: .001 @098 t, z: 6 6136 (13-LIWI-INn S-LNno:D @9 a6ed -- lO9g'7Z6606, UIOJA ujezo:LL 966L cirl OF:TENECOU COOHN U?(LINITED Site Code : 152502 @IC/@Er TWILIGHT NMTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start Date: , 03/25/96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY @ile@I.D RECOSBPI SMTHBOUND Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56 50th 85th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6 Pct pct. 11:00 01/25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 !l 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !I 29 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 34 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 29 06:00 0 0 0 3 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 '6 23 29 07:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33 08:00 0 0 0 0 8 22 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 48 28 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 7 13 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 32 U:00 0 0 1 1 11 10 9 A 0 0 0 0 0 21 33 12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 4 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 28 33 01:00 0 0 0 2 10 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 25 33 02:f)O 0 0 0 3 10 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 '17 28 33 03:00 0 0 1 1 a 23 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 @4 23 33 04:00 0 0 2 1 6 26 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 @8 21 32 05:00 0 0 0 1 9 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 @9 21 33 D6:00 0 0 0 1 12 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 @l 2@ 33 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 @67 3q 36 08:00 0 0 0 1 6 8 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 37 09.00 0 0 0 1 4 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34 io.oo 0 0 0 2 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2! 32 II-.00 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 @Q 3: 34 Day Totals 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 579 2@ Totals 0 0 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 0 0 0 0 5@8 s@ s@tistics. 15th Percentile S@ 22 MM Kedian Speed (50th perceiitile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 KPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 KPH 95th Percentile 37 MPH 10 UH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vebicles in Pace 397 Percent of vehicles in Pace 66.841 of Vebicies > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 4F!I: .00@ (i3-L i w i -it-4n si-Nnoo L ased -- 1099IZ6606, u'OJA weZO:LL 966L 'LL 1,,dV Apsn4 ite Codd : 152502 CITY OF.: U CLDUHM MIMITED @IC/@Lr TWILIGGT MC)RTB STAR 909-247.6716 Start Date: 03/26/96 7 DAY SPEED SUR;EY File'l.D@ T-ICOSBPI 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 5 Ktb 65th Time 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 60 999 12:00 03/26 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33 05:00 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 21 34 06:00 0 0 0 2 2 11 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 ?2 28 34 07:00 0 0 1 2 5 9 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 @6 27 34 32 09:00 0 1 1 1 10 30 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 61 2@ 09:00 0 1 0 1 8 a 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 33 LI:00 0 0 0 0 8 12 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 33 12,00 p@ 0 1 0 3 9 14 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @4 -,3 33 01.00 0 0 3 2 6 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 @9 26 32 02:00 1 0 0 4 11 20 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 51 21 33 03:00 0 0 0 0 13 30 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 @2 2J 33 04:00 0 0 1 4 1 19 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 45 21 33 05-.OO 0 0 1 2 10 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 @0 2@ 32 06.,OO 0 0 0 3 12 29 18 4 0 0 0 0 a @6 2 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 5 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 33 0 0 0 2 23 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 a 11 10 2 0 0 4 13 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 12 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 10.,OO 0 0 0 0 4 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 11:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 34 Day Totals 1 3 8 28 128 292 215 42 2 1 79 2@ Totals 1 3 8 28 129 282 215 42 2 0 0 0 0 719 s@tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 PR 14edian Speed (50th percentile), 28 RH Aver@ Speed - All Vebicles 29 MM 95th Percentile Speed 33 KM 95th Percentile Speed 36 PH -35 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26 Nw&r of VebLicles in Pace 497 Percent of VeEcles in Pace 70.02t Nuiber of VeUcles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of VaUcles > 55 MPH: .00% (i 3 i i w i -1 N n s j- N n o o 19 a8ed -- @09SIZ6606, @0-IJ Ule2O:LL 966L CITY Of TEK@ COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite c@ : I '52502 @ic/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 03/27/% 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSBPL Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- :50th 35th ii3c 5 10 15 0 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@l :Pct" ..Pct. 12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 !2 3@ 139 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 @2 3@ 34 .0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 39 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 21 34 06:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 '1 23 33 07:00 0 1 0 4 8 13 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 27 33 08:00 0 0 0 2 9 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 48 27 32 09:00 0 0 0 0 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 23 31' 10-00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 27 33 11:00 0 0 1 1 5 15 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 24 33 12:00 po 0 0 1 3 4 16 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 @3 27 3 01:00 0 1 0 3 1 4 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 @6 30 33 02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 a 0 0 0 @3 21 32 03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 33 Totals 0 2 3 17 61 132 113 20 1 0 0 0 0 3@4 SRged @t@ics, 15tb Percentile Speed 22 Xedian Speed (@ percentile): 28 KPII kverage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 35th Percentile Speed 33 XPH 95th Percentile 36 KPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vebicles in Pace 250 Percent of V@cles in Pace 70.421 N@-r of Vehicles > 55 RH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 HIIH: .00% CE3-LlWl-lF4n S-LNNOO @6 a6ed -- 10981?6606, IUOJJ @CZO:LL 966L 'LL I ,dV Aeps-,n,4 CITY OF TEMECULA COSMIC DRIVE SOUTH OF NORTH STAR SPEED SURVEY DATA NORTHBOUND MARCH 27 - APRIL 3, 1996 ,.c: @n ,,,Grero le,, @uutii6 ONLimilLi) Site Coce : ' - SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Star' Date: 03@'2',, 96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMNB unp@nu IDAM. I 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 3 6- 41- 46- 5'- - 56- 6!- 50th 35th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 03/27 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 pm 01:00 02:00 0 0 3 1 a 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 38 2 33 03:00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 28 33 04:00 0 0 0 2 6 13 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 39 29 33 05:00 0 0 0 3 14 14 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 49 27 33 06:00 0 0 2 2 8 16 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 39 27 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 3 8 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 21 2'0 38 09:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 38 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 29 49 11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39 Day Totals 5 11 52 96 81 21 5 2 273 28 - - - -- i-@.@.. @iz@ @oce : - D SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03,271;96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMIIB Mf)DT@rTu 1).,. 2 Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 35th Time 20 25 30 35 40 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 031128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 05:00 0 0 1 1 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 38 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 29 33 07:00 0 0 1 0 5 6 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 2-, 31 33 08:00 0 0 0 0 9 19 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 28 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 8 4 3 1 0 1) 0 0 21 15 36 10:00 0 0 0 2 4 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1-, 27 33 11:00 0 0 0 1 7 13 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 32 27 33 1-2:00 pm 0 0 0 1 4 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 2- 3'@ @3 01:00 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 30 23 '@7 02:00 0 0 1 2 4 17 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 40 18 34 03:00 0 1 0 2 7 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 43 28 33 04:00 0 0 1 1 12 12 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 38 21-' 32 05:00 0 0 0 2 7 7 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 13 06:00 0 0 0 1 4 15 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 30 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 33 08:00 0 0 1 0 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 3-' 09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 29 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 32 34 11:00 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 32 34 Day Totais 1 5@ 16 87 160 158 48 4 479 28 -Z,- i -, -1,@ @ I @@ulti@ LNL.Iii 'ED Sit2 C@(:e : 'I-,.@Dtio SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03/i27i96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TEC'@-)SHNB NORTHBOUND/DOWNHILL Pace Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- @1- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- - 50t.'@ 35th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 03/29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 32 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 9 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 23 29 36 07:00 0 0 1 1 2 6 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 30 34 08:00 0 0 1 1 7 25 20 3 1 0 0 0 0 58 28 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 26 28 37 10:00 0 0 0 1 0 a 6 2 0 0 0 0 1) 17 28 33 11:00 0 0 0 2 3 12 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 32 29 33 l@1:00 Po el 0 0 2 3 9 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 27 ?g 3E ol.:Oo 0 0 2 1 5 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 02:00 0 0 2 1 8 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 28 @'2 03:00 0 0 1 1 7 18 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 46 28 33 04:00 0 0 0 2 5 10 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 32 29 33 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 10 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 33 31 14 06:00 0 0 0 4 3 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 2 11 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 36 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 2- 34 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 4 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 18 31 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 24 33 .11:00 0 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 33 Day Totals 7 24 68 184 176 43 4 2 508 28 SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03 Q6 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File TECI@E14113 NORTHBOUND/DOW'NHILL p3ce Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26 - 31- 3 6- 41- 46 - 1 - 56- 6'L - 35c, Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 03/130 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 13 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 '@4 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 29 34 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2- 49 05:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 06:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 9 4 0 0 1) 0 0 31 36 07:00 0 0 1 2 5 6 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 33 08:00 0 0 1 0 8 18 8 2 0 0 0 0 1-7 1, 3,' 09:00 0 0 0 0 4 15 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 29 34 10:00 0 1 0 4 12 13 8 5 0 0 0 0 4-1, 34 11:00 0 0 1 2 9 25 10 3 0 0 0 0 ro 32 12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 8 21 9 1 0 r, 0 3@ 01:00 0 0 0 1 5 6 13 1 1 (0 0 0 02:00 0 0 1 3 6 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 @12 27 3@1 03:00 0 0 1 3 4 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 fl, 25 27 31 04:00 0 1 1 1 2 13 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 2-1 3@ 05:00 0 0 0 3 13 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 21 06:00 0 0 0 1 11 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 26 33 07:00 0 0 0 2 2 7 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 20 28 3,- 08:00 0 0 0 3 0 3 a 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 30 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 1) 0 0 0 11 2- 31 11:00 0 0 1 1 4 2 1 1 0 1) 0 0 10 23 39 Day Totals 2 6 28 100 192 137 35 4 504 27 SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03;12-,,96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TEC,@s,'IqIB Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- -1- 50t.@ 35@h 0- Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. P't. 12:00 03@131 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 05:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27 06:00 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2-@, 29 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 5 12 9 3 0 0 0 0 29 28 34 10:00 0 0 0 5 9 14 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 26 29 0 0 0 2 3 9 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 29 33 12:00 pm 0 0 2 2 7 1'@ 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2@' @13 OI:CO 0 0 1 3 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 24 32 02:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 27 32 03:00 0 0 0 2 1 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 29 33 04:00 0 0 0 1 2 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33 05:00 0 0 0 0 7 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 2- 32 06:00 0 0 0 1 8 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 31 09:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 33 IO:CO 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 3,' Day Totals 3 22 76 134 100 16 1 352 27 SECOND LOCATION 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: )3/@@-l-,,'96 DAY SPEED SURVEY P4@!-A- I.D. "ECOSMNB Bqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th TiMe 5 @0 15 20 25 30 35 40 55 60 ?99 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 041/01 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29 05:00 0 1 0 0 2 6 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 28 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 .9 28 1@3 Oi-:00 0 0 0 1 2 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 23 ig '2 08:00 0 0 0 2 5 16 11.2 2 0 0 0 0 0 '-)5 33 09:00 0 0 2 2 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 25 76 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 4 11 9 0 0 0 0 11 24 11:00 0 0 0 2 5 5 4 1 0 0 0 c 12:00 pm 0 0 3 3 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 -'5 3 01:00 0 0 0 2 9 16 8 1 0 0 0 c@ 0 36 3-1 f,'2:00 0 1 0 0 6 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33 03:CO 0 0 0 2 4 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 21-' 28 04:00 0 0 0 1 15 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 28 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 11 23 7 5 1 0 0 0 1) 4-@ 2- 33 06:00 0 0 1 1 12 10 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 26 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 0 7 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 34 08:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34 09:00 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 28 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 11:@,O 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2;' 32 Day Totals 2 3 20 88 191 131 26 5 1 467 28 SECOI(D LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Dat-2: 03,@2;7196 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSHNB ILL page Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pcl@. 12:00 04/02 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 3' 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34 05:00 0 1 0 1 2 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 33 06:00 0 0 2 1 7 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 26 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 6 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 22 417 33 08:00 0 0 0 4 7 19 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 4-; 28 32 09:00 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 fD 16 33 2- 10:00 0 0 0 3 11 1-3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 36 26 32 il@:00 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 18 15 36 l@1:00 PM 0 0 2 2 11 11 2 0 0 0 0 28 ?C, 313 01:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 26 30 34 02:00 0 0 4 0 3 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 21-, 32 03:00 0 0 0 0 5 8 a 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 34 04:00 0 0 0 0 a 16 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 40 28 34 05:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33 06:00 0 0 0 0 2 13 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 30 29 36 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 28 33 08:00 0 0 0 3 3 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 34 09:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 29 39 ,.O:oo 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29 11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 31 34 Day Totals 1 7 18 76 167 124 44 438 28 Site @oce SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 031,'27,'96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMNB NORTHBOUND/@ILL 3 Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 04/03 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34 05:00 0 1 0 0 2 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 34 06:00 0 0 0 3 4 9 '17 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33 07:00 0 0 1 2 3 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 2' 32 08:00 0 0 0 2 8 15 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 41- 29 33 09:00 0 2 0 6 11 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33 10:00 0 0 0 1 4 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 28 33 11:00 0 0 1 1 5 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 33 12:00 pm 0 0 0 1 8 11 9 4 1 0 (1 0 0 34 23 34 01:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 28 33 02:00 0 0 1 1 3 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@- 33 Totals 0 9 41 151 594 1215 994 253 25 6 0 0 0 3288 Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (50th Dercentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 2209 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.16% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% CITY OF TEMECULA COS;VIIC DRIVE / SOUTH OF NORTH ST'F, SPEED SURVEY DATA SOUTHBOUND MARCH 27 - APRIL 3,1996 2ED LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909.247.6716 Star' Date: 03 @6 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECCSIISB SOUTHBOUNDIUPHILL ge I @iri 0- 6- 17@- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61@- 50th 85th Tine 5 10 15 20 25 45 50 9 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 03/27 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 pm 01:00 02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 2n 03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 53 28 @3 04:00 0 0 0 2 5 27 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 29 33 05:00 0 0 1 4 9 33 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 -;1 28 33 06:00 0 1 0 3 8 21 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 58 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 4 7 11 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33 08:00 1 0 0 0 4 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 .15 27 31 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 29 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 31 33 ll:no 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 33 Da,.i '@otais 1 1 2 17 58 157 133 20 389 28 2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909-247.6716 Star* ;a-@@:' 96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY i,- - :--- -.D. : SOUTBOOD/UPHILL Begi,i 0- 6- 11- 16- 2 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51-- 56- 6:-- 0 t @5t.@ Time 10 15 2@10 25 30 35 4 55 60 999 Tota.1 ?ct. DC- 03/28 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1) 3 32 j4 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1) 0 2 29 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 1) 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 (11 0 0 C) 1) 2 29 4 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 - 1 L 1 0 0 0 0 28 4 06:00 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 2 0 13 @17 1,3 07:00 0 0 0 8 12 12 1 10 0 0 c 08:00 0 0 0 5 11 29 15 1 0 0 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 :,JO 0 0 2 10 100 0 '4 12:00 r, 0 0 2 10 1-7 9 0 @1:00 0 0 0 2 1- 13 14 2 0 o2:,JO 0 0 1 1 11 22 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 44 03:00 0 0 1 0 13 24 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 @o 25 31 ,)4:00 0 10 0 14 21, 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 53 ,)5:00 c 0 1 3 26 19 1 0 0 0 0 1@ @3 23 06:00 0 0 0 2 10 23 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 ;:o 27 @3' 07:00 0 0 0 1 - 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 @6 28 -')3 08:00 0 0 1 0 4 10 11 4 0 0 0 10 1 34 09:00 0 0 1 2 14 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 31 23 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 l@ 28 34 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 31 @13 Day Totals 1 7 22 131 281 189 36 4 6-1 27 211D '@OCATION IN FRONT OF 421-76) 909-247.6716 St3r: D3:e: 01 7-7 '-6 7 DkY SPEED SURVEY :,;ie -.D. TECCS2sB Pace @in 0- 6- 16- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- Time 10 35 4 12:00 03/4-9 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1) 0 1)3:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 7@ 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 10 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 0 0 0 28 3-' 06:00 0 0 0 1 3 14 3 0 0 0 18 -g 3'@ 07:00 0 0 1) 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1) 0 3 1)8:00 0 0 0 4 11 26 11- 3 0 0 1) 0 0 -'3 09:00 0 0 0 0 2 8 9 0 0 0 0 1? 79 @3 3 0 '4 10 10 4 0 4 12: f)O Dm 0 0 5 21 20 2 0 0 0 49 9 2 0 0 0 1 2 10 22 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 4@A )5:00 0 0 0 1 6 24 15 6 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 3 11 25 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 66 23 07:00 0 0 0 2 13 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 35 28 '@,3 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 7 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Totais 3 22 107 231 190 36 2 591 28 2!ID cv0@['P OF 1?1-@ DAY SPEED SURVEY 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 01- io '-5 55 60 999 Tozal Pct. Pct. lz':OO C3i3O 0 1 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O',,:OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 011:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 1) 12:00 Po 0 13 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 01: 0 0 tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C',:)O 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )4:00 0 0 2 3 8 0 0 0 0 @6 2 iD5:00 0 0 2 10 14 12 0 1 0 0 0 c 39 2-' 3- 06:00 0 0 0 2 9 18 13 1 0 0 0 0 fi 43 2' @1' 07:00 0 0 0 1 6 14 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 2"0 0 8 :,I- 0 0 0 0 7 1 6 3 0 0 2- 7 3 09:00 0 0 0 1 5 7 6 1 0 0 0 2'9 31 38 10:00 0 0 0 1 4 1@ 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28 32 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 31 Day Totais 10 46 90 76 13 2 1 238 28 2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909.247.61-,16 StarL Date: 03 7@-, 96 7 DAY SPEED SURI@'EY J.D. T(C@@"@B SOUTHBOUND/UPffILL Beqin 0- 6- !1- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- qoth 35-@1'@ T@ime 5 10 15 20 :5 '10 @15 40 45 50 -5 60 ?99 Tot3,, p@,. PC+. 12:00 03,@31 0 11 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 01:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 34 03:00 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:'JO 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 2- 29 05:00 0 0 1) 1 0 0 0 11 2- 19 f,'6 :,JO 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 7 19 ',4 O-/:Oo ci 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 0 15 08:C,O 0 - 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 -6 0 4 6 0 @3 2 5 1 7 32 2 7 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 ,--:)O 0 11) 2 6 -1,3 '4 1,10 0 21 9 11 3 5' C)2:00 0 0 0 1 3 I.,L 5 1 0 1 0 0 2- 03:00 0 0 0 0 10 21 9 10 9 0 1) 0 0 40 @17 3'- ,,:I - 41 1 11 11 1 4 1;1 14 u 11 1) J) t@ - 20 -1 05:00 0 0 0 4 3 17 11 1 0 0 0 41 27 12 06:00 0 0 0 2 5 21 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 2; @12 07:00 0 0 0 1 10 22 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 52 '118 33 08:00 0 0 0 1 5 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 24 2@ 32 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 29 29 36 10:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33 11:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 32 Day Totais 26 24 1.05 249 143 18 3 1 569 27 2ND LOCKTION IN FRONT OF 42 17 6) 909.247.6716 Star+ Date: 1)3.21 96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY L7i@e '4.D. -ECJS-SB SOUTBOUND/UPHILL D40. 6 Begin 0- 6- !1- 16- 21- 26- 3!- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- -ot., 35th Tii3e 5 10 60 999 :'ct. Pct. 15 20 25 30 3r, 40 45 50 55 1 . 2:00 04/01 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 j3 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 @9 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1) 0 1) 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39 04:00 0 0 0 0 (0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 34 44 05:00 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 f) 0 9 23 33 06:00 0 1) 0 @j 3 3 1 0 1) 0 9 -8 34 07:00 0 1) 0 2 3 5 2 0 0 08:00 0 0 PI 3 6 13 9 3 0 01 0 '4 77 @3 09:00 0 0 0 6 8 9 1 0 0 0 10: 0 0 2 70 5 4- 79 ll:,JO 0 0 1 1 4 17 1-17 2 0 0 0 0 ol@ DM f) 0 0 13 10 2 0 0 ;)I : 00 11 0 1 4 20 12 3 0 0 @6 !)2:00 0 0 0 2 5 22 9 0 0 0 1 0 1) 38 03:00 0 0 1 2 7 16 13 4 0 0 0 0 (0 43 23 04 :01) 0 0 12 19 14 0 0 1) 0 116 05:00 0 0 0 1 13 18 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 41- 2-17 32 lD6:00 0 0 1 2 13 26 14 1 0 0 0 0 5-/ 27 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 6 17 12 0 0 0 0 0 116 28 1@2 08:00 0 0 0 2 9 13 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 46 28 33 09:00 0 0 0 3 5 8 0 0 0 0 '4 32 10:00 0 0 0 1 2 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1-2 3' 11:00 0 0 2 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 12 24 29 Day Totais 6 32 114 253 178 28 2 613 27 2ND LOCATION III FRONT OF 42'@1-6) 909.247.6716 Star, Date: DAY SPEED SURVEY '.D. SOUTHBOL'ND/UPHILL Page Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- ,11- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 5oti Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 rIo 55 60 999 Tot3l Pcl. Pc:. 12:00 04,@02 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 34 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04:00 0 0 0 1) 1 4 0 0 0 1) t) 0 0 5 26 23 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 2- 32 06:00 0 0 4 3 2 0 0 1 23 32 07:00 0 0 0 1 4 !6 5 3 1 0 0 pi '0 20 34 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 18 12 2 0 0 0 3-1 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2- -')2 10:00 0 0 0 5 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 @-@3 li@:00 0 0 0 6 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2@ 3- 12:00 pm 0 0 1 1 5 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 31, 2'@ 01:00 0 0 0 1 4 9 13 0 0 0 ig 2@@ 33 02:,,'C 0 0 1 2 12 17 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 45 03:00 0 0 0 0 6 21 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 46 28 33 04:00 0 0 3 1 11 14 18 5 1 1 0 0 0 54 28 34 05:00 0 0 1 2 13 22 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 @5 2-1 12 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 22 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 41 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 5 22 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 44 28 08:00 0 0 0 1 8 10 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 35 29 09:00 0 0 0 3 2 11 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 23 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 6 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 29 33 11:00 0 0 Ci 0 2 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 33 Day Totals 5 22 104 252 180 36 7 3 610 28 2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 4211-,6) 909.247.6716 Star, Date: 03 2- Q6 7 DAY SPEED SUR117EY TECCS-SB SOU'THBOUND/UPHILL page 3 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 35tt Time 5 10 15 30 15 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 04/03 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34 01:00 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 19 29 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34 04:00 0 1) 0 2 2 0 f) 0 0 0 0 6 2 32 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33 06:00 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 1) 0 13 @'3 -'6 07:00 0 0 0 2 2 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 23 .9 36 lm:,Jo (3 1) 5 9 12 6 2 0 0 0 1) 0 35 26 3 09:00 0 0 2 9 9 1 0 0 0 23 3 10:00 0 0 0 1 6 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32 11:00 0 0 3 7 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 '3 11:00 PM 0 0 1 2 4 14 9 5 1) 0 0 0 0 35 2o 34 Ol:,@O 0 0 0 2 9 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 29 26 32 02:00 0 0 0 1 4 16 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33 Totals 1 2 53 1-1 724 1616 1@169 208 21 5 0 0 0 391-0 Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 .4PH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 2785 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.14% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00$ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENA STREET / WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE 24 HOUR SPEED SURVEY EASTBOUND/REPLACEMENT COUNT APRIL 1996 'IC' yn I/c -@ERIFIC.kTITON SPEED SURVEY COUIIT 909.247.61-16 Start Da@: 04e 103,9, 6 PM WED/6 PM THUR Fiie I.D. : TE!CEBS2 EKSTBOCND Begin 0- 6- @l- i6- 21- 26- 3i- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50'Ll 85th Tize 5 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct. 12:00 04@@03 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 O:,)O 12:cjO i) ri 01:00 C2:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 0 1 2 1 3 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 111) 2;- 73 0: ','O 0 0 1 4 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 33 08:00 2 0 0 1 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 36 09:00 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34 10:00 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 24 11:00 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 Day Totais 2 2 2 4 11 14 13 7 55 27 "'ERIFICATION SPEED SUR'@EY COUNT 6 PM WED/6 PM THUR Beain 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- Time @:00 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:00 0 0 1) 0 2 5 @,'3 : ()O 0 1 0 4 09:00 0 0 1 1 0 1 10:i)O 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 12:00 pm 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 1 1 5 03:00 0 1 1 1 3 6 04:00 0 1 0 6 8 05:00 0 1 1 3 7 a @otals 2 6 11 11 37 65 Soeed St3tist'cs. 15th Percentile Speed 19 14PE Median Speed (50th percentile): 27 qPH Average SDeed - kil 'vehicles 27 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Sp@- 26-35 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 117 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 58.02% N@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% --9@@9.2'4@ start @ate: 04;ioll;96 7.6716 '.D. TE.-.GEB32 r I C!T I @11- 3 6- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50ti@ 35'h 55 60 999 Total pct. pc@ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 29 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 1) 1 9 0 0 0 0 @9 0 0 2 21- 29 0 0 1) 0 1 .9 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2- 33 3 2 0 0 0 0 11 8 11 37 0 1 0 0 0 20 34 0 9 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) - 28 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 22 28 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 26 @, 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 26 32 52 16 0 0 0 0 201 APR 1 0 1 25424jaclynAvenue Moreno VallU, CA -,92557 tel 909-24Z6716 @fax 909..924-8604. ,4L@ Barbara N. Sackett - Counts Unlimited @74 pages including co r t.098VZGGOG a3-Liwi-i"n sinnoo L abed -- '7092'7Z6606, WOJJ weo,7:9 966L 'LL !'dV AePsJn4i :c':'CM OF TENECUU COWS UNLIMITED CMUIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 0/96 7 DAY CWNT NOMU)(D 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- Time 5 10 15 20 25 -30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 12:00 03/20 01:00 t k t 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 t t 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 PR Ol:W 02:00 03:00 04:DO 0 0 0 5 5 a 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26 132 0 30 26 @33 05:00 0 0 2 2 9 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 1 3 0 4 15 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 133 07:00 0 0 0 3 3 7 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 @34 08:00 0 0 1 2 3 3 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 21 36 09:00 0 0 1 0 4 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 28 @33 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 la 32 34 I 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 4 32 134 Day Totals 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 177 28 Totals 0 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 0 0 0 0 177 Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median @ (50th percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH 85th Percentile speed 34 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH 10 ?ff Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@r of Vehicles in Pace 105 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59.99t X@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 12 a6ed 1099126606, UJOJJ weol:g 966L ILL I!jdv Aepsinqi site ."CITY OF TERCULA ODUNTS UNLIRITED : 152509 COMIC/BET TWILIGECT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start@Dat6: 03'/21/96 7 DIY COUNT File r. NORNM'ND pa(],2 Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @th 8 5,th Ti 35 40 60 999 Total 1 12:00 03/21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 *1 ;29 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03-.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34 04:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 291 @39 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 05:00 0 0 0 2 4 5 5 7 06:00 0 0 0 0 5 16 2 2 0 ri 0 0 0 2 21 @29 07:00 0 0 0 2 6 9 a 2 1 0 0 0 0 29 28 @@34 08:00 0 0 1 2 5 18 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 54 30, 134 09,.OO 0 0 0 1 2 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 31 134 10,.DO 0 0 1 3 6 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 21 24 ;33 11:00 0 0 1 2 6 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 26 @29 12:GO Pik 0 0 0 3 4 8 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 30 29 34 oi:oo 0 0 0 2 5 10 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 28 28 133 02:00 0 0 0 1 1 6 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 134 03:00 0 0 0 1 12 14 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 21, @33 04.00 0 0 0 1 6 12 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 37 29 33 05:00 0 0 0 2 4 11 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 44 31 134 06:00 0 0 0 1 7 11 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 23 !33 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 134 08:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 311 133 09:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 -- -- 16 10:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 137 11,00 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 32; 3 Day Totals 3 27 79 159 195 39 4 1 1 499 29' Totals 0 0 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 0 0 1 498 Spted Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 HP]i Median (50U percentile): 29 NPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPff 95th Percentile Speed 33 KPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 KPH 10 IN Pace Speed : 26-35 MN of Vehicles in Pace 344 Percent of vehicles in Pace 69.061 N@r of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 RPH: .001 a3-Liwi-lNn s-LNnoo aBEd -- @099@26606, wOl@ wPO-i:g 966L 'LL It V AePsJrlql COWS UlfLIMITED site q'@ @: 152508 CITY OF TWULA StartiDate: 0 22/96 COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH SykR 909.247.6716 '/ 0 7 DLY MM File 1. TIC SHB MORTMUND 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- T 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T, 12:00 03/22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 124 0 0 0 t 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 0 5 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 15 23 @36 05.00 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 133 06:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 24 29@ 36 07:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 7 3 2 0 0 0 58 28 133 08:00 0 0 2 1 6 23 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 31 28.1 j33 09:00 0 0 0 2 a 8 11 2 0 0 0 1 j34 10:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 32 11:00 0 0 0 4 5 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 36 29@ 114 1 0 0 38 27 @33 12:00 PR 0 0 3 1 8 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 281 132 01:00 0 1 02:00 0 0 1 0 6 18 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 :33 03:00 0 0 0 2 10 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 281 @32 04:00 0 0 1 3 7 14 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 39 291, @34 05:00 0 0 1 0 6 11 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 29@ 34 06:00 0 0 1 1 6 14 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 36 28 @34 07:00 0 0 1 4 1 4 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 291 @133 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 10 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 '34 0 0 0 2 1 4 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 311 34 09:00 1 I 10:00 0 0 1 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 28. 132 1 1 7 0 1 0 11 321 33 Day Totals 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 54 : 9 28@ Totals 0 0 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 0 0 0 0 549 15th Percentile Speed 22 MP P.,dian Speed (5M percentile): 29 NM .kverage Speed - )Lll Vehicles 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MM 10 MM Pace Speed 26-35 MPH N@er of Vehicles in Pace 363 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.00% of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH.- .00% CEa-Liwi-INn S-LNnoo '7 a ed -- @O9@Z6606, woil we0@:'g 9&6L 'LL ILJDV ePSJ@ql COUNTS UNLIMITED CITY OP memu COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 3/96 7 DAY COUNT mnp?wllmn Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- T 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T Ill.-OO 03/23 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 37 @139 0 0 0 0 02.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 34 137 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 22 31 137 06:00 0 0 0 2 1 7 7 5 1 07:00 0 0 0 3 6 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 29 27@ 133 08:00 0 0 0 3 4 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 271 132 09:00 0 0 0 2 12 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 27; 133 0 0 45 27@ 132 10:00 0 0 3 4 a 18 10 2 0 0 a 1 11:00 0 0 0 4 6 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 134 1 12.00 pii 0 0 0 4 17 13 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 26 .32 01:00 0 0 0 4 6 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 49 28@ 33 02:00 0 0 1 4 8 20 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 27 132 03:00 0 0 2 12 8 a 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 23 132 0 0 59 271 1.32 04:00 0 0 0 6 12 20 19 1 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 10 a 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 26' .@29 06:00 0 0 1 7 9 11 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 36 25 1.34 07:00 0 0 1 5 4 11 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 38 281 !33 08:00 0 0 0 1 4 17 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 29; @33 09:00 0 0 2 1 3 3 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 30@ 134 10:00 0 0 0 2 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 241 133 11:00 0 0 0 2 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 Day Totals 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 656 27@ Totals 0 0 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 0 0 0 0 65b SWO statist!-. 15th Percentile Sped 20 MPH Median S@ (50th percutile): 27 HPH Averaqe Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 HPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @er of Vehicles in Pace 398 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60-58% Nwtber of Vehicles > 55 MR 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 )M: .001 s a ed 109@26606, @OIA WeOl:g 966L 'LL l@jdv Aepsinq,i cm or TEMUU COUNTS UNLIMITED a COSKICIBET TWILIGHT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 4/96 7 DLY COOT XORTEMD Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th@ 85th T 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T Y-t . pct. 12:00 03/24 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 129 oi:oo 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 @32 02.00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 139 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 05-.00 0 2:' 139 06:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 28 07:00 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 129 08:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 ; 09:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 281 1!33 10:00 0 0 0 3 7 9 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 :36 11:00 0 1 0 0 5 12 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 @32 1 12:00 pH 0 0 0 4 6 6 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 33 01:00 0 0 0 3 2 16 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 43 301; 34 02:00 0 0 1 1 5 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 271 33 03:00 0 0 0 4 7 15 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 44 211 31 04:00 0 0 1 0 12 13 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 47 28, 133 05:00 0 0 1 4 12 12 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 26 132 06:00 0 0 0 5 7 11 11 1 a 0 0 0 0 15 27 :33 07:00 0 0 0 5 7 12 3 0 a 0 0 0 0 27 26 129 08:00 0 0 0 1 6 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 25 281 34 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 271 32 10:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23, 33 11:00 0 0 0 2 29@ 34 Day Totals 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 472 27 Totals 0 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 0 0 0 0 472 Mediam Speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH Average Speed - AU Vehicles 23 85th PerceAtile Speed 33 MPH 9@ Percentile Speed 36 10 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vehicles in Pace 307 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 64.90% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% 9 1099@2661)6, -14 --O@-9 966L LL l@,dv Aeps-,n,, CM OF TEI(ECOLK COO)rrS UMLIMITED Site ode@: lnz)ud t@ @/25/96 CCSNIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 Star Dat6: 0 7 DAY COM File D. T@@B NOR Pa(3e I. I Begin O- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @Oth 85tb Ti*e 5 io 15 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total kt, Pt. 12:00 03/25 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 !29 OI:DO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 139 02:00 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 119 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 241 129 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 a 271 137 06:DO 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 28@ 34 4 34 07:00 0 0 0 0 8 9 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 16 301 OB:OG 0 0 1 1 9 19 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 50 28:; 33 0 0 13 26, 32 09.00 0 0 1 0 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 1 2 9 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 20 281 36 11:00 0 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 29; 32 12:00 PR 0 0 0 3 13 5 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27@ 134 01:00 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 271 1 !34 02:00 0 0 0 0 7 a 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 28@ 36 03;00 0 0 0 0 5 19 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 29 133 04.00 0 0 2 2 2 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 28! 133 05:00 0 0 0 3 3 13 6 0 0 0 G 0 0 30 26@ 31 06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 36 08:00 0 0 0 0 6 6 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 24 29, 34 09:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 24 139 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 134 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *1 1* Day Totals 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 415 28@ Totals 0 0 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 0 0 0 0 415 Statistics. - 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 KPH kverage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MP]] 85tb Percentile Speed 33 KPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 RH Pace Speed 26-35 KPH Nwaber of Vehicles in Pace 271 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 65.14% Nwiber of Vehicles > 55 NFH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 NPII: .00% Z a6ed 1099@26606, WOJA we0@:9 966L 'LL l@idy Aepsinq- CITY . oF Tmuu COOI(TS UNLIMITED Site ode @: 152508 COSMIC/BL7 TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 StartiDate: 031/26/96 File D. T COSNB 7 DAY ODUNT MORTHBOUN Page &-qin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- oth@ 81 th Tile 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Ict.i Pct. 12:00 03/26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29@ @34 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 221 124 05:00 0 0 1 0 2 a 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29' 33 06:00 0 0 0 0 6 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 26. 32 07.-DO 0 0 2 1 3 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 28; 133 08:00 0 0 0 2 5 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 34 28@ 133 09:00 0 0 0 4 2 9 a 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 281 @33 10:00 0 0 0 1 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 ;33 11:00 0 1 0 0 6 7 6 3 0 0 a 0 0 23 281 '34 12:00 pit 0 0 1 2 7 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 27! 33 01;00 0 0 1 0 5 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 291 33 02:00 0 0 3 4 8 16 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 47 27; 34 03:00 0 0 0 4 2 19 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 28' 33 04:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 23 31@ 05:00 0 0 1 3 7 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26;i 32 06:00 0 1 0 1 a 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 27@ 133 07:00 0 0 0 0 4 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 129 08:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29.1 133 09:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 31. @37 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27: 29 11:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19. 29 Day Totals 2 9 24 80 145 119 30 3 2 414 28@" Totals 0 2 9 24 80 145 119 30 3 2 0 0 0 414 SNO Statisti@. 15th Percentile 21 MPH Median S@ (50th percentile),. 28 MPH Average speed - All VebLicies 28 MPH 85th Percentile Sped 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 WR 10 PH Pace @ed 26-35 MPH @r of Vehicles in Pace 264 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 63.61% @r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 )M: .00% a3-Liwi-iNn si"noo 9 a6ed -- t?099@26606, WOJA weol:g 966L 'LL ltjdv Aepsinql CITY OF TENECUU COUNTS U)(LIMITED Site;Codd - 1525N Star Dat I e: 0'3/27196 @C/BM TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247,6716 7 DAY COW File @I.D.1 T'*NB NOR D Pa(p Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- .50th 85th Tille 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. pct. 12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 *. 29 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 O(:OO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 11 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 la 29 33 07:00 0 0 0 3 4 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 la 2@l 33 08:00 0 0 2 1 10 18 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 47 2@ 33 09:00 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 31 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 10 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 35 11:00 0 0 1 2 3 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 27. 32 12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 33 01:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 21 28 34 02:00 0 0 3 1 a 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 38 27 33 03:00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 2& 33 Totals 0 1 G 10 48 109 50 24 3 0 0 0 0 281 @d Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH median S@ (50U percentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All vehicles 29 Wu 95th Percentile S@ 33 MM 95th Percentile Speed 37 KPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 KPB Naber of Vehicles in Pace 189 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.02t Munber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 a3iiwi-iNn sinnoo 6 abed -- 1099'726606, WOJA WEOI:V 966L 'LL i-!J V A-PSJ-qi Apr, 25,124jac@ Avenue Moreno Val@, CA 92557 tel 909.247-6716 &fax 909.924.8604 4 i -n Barbara N. Sackett - Counts Unl'i ited 11-7 pages including cover t abed 17099@Z6606, @OJI @LZO:LL 966L 'LL I sin4i ClIfy or @mu COMS UNLIMITED @ite c@ . i.52502 @mic/@'ET TWILIGHT NorH STAR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 63/20/96 7 UY SPEED SURVEY ile I.D. TDCOWI %UT@ aqe: 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50@ 95th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 i5 50 55 60 999 Totli pct.! Pct. 12:00 03@20 Oi:oo 02:00 k 03:00 05:00 06:00 k t 07:00 08:00 09:00 t 10:00 ii:oo 12:00 p t 01:00 02:00 Jr 03:00 04:00 0 0 0 3 14 21 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 26, 32 05:00 0 0 0 5 13 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 33 06:00 0 1 0 5 a 19 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 2i 31 07,.OO 1 0 1 0 4 2 10 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 9 2@ 34 08:00 0 0 1 5 7 12 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 09:00 0 0 0 2 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 10:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 37 :oo 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 34 Day Tota ls 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 1 22 2 Totals 0 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 0 0 0 1 22 @LaLisLics. I 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median Speed (@ percentile): 27 KPH Average All Vehicles 28 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace SpW 26-35 MPH N@ of Vehicles in Pace 152 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.281 Number of Vehicles ) 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 M: .001 (i3-Liwji-iNn si-Nnoz) 2 aBLd -- @099'726606, IJOJJ IIU20:LL 966L 'LL IIJ V AePsJnPi CITY OF TD(@ COU]FTS 0)(LIHITED @ite Cod@ 52502 COMC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH ST)LR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 03/21/96 1 ill I.Dl TEOOSBPL 7 DAY SPEED SURVE71 Pace@ SOUTHMD 1 Bqin 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 3I- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @50th a5th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@i Pctl pct. 2:00 Oi]21 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32 1 Oi:oo 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 24 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 06:00 0 0 0 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 33 07:00 0 0 1 0 7 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33 08:00 0 0 0 0 5 26 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 13 09:00 u 0 0 3 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 32 10.,OO 0 0 1 0 2 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33 ii:oo I 0 0 1 4 4 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 32 12;00 p@ 0 0 1 1 5 13 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 34 oi:oo 0 0 1 5 2 13 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 21@ 34 02:00 0 0 1 1 10 13 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32 03:00 0 0 0 3 4 23 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33 04:00 0 0 0 2 4 22 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@ 34 u(i v 0 0 1 11 22 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 28 33 06:oo 0 0 0 2 8 25 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 33 08:00 0 0 1 2 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 32 09:oo 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 32 2@ 31 10:00 0 0 0 0 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 29 Ddy Tot 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 5 2 2 Totals 0 0 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 0 0 0 0 5 2 sdeed St I atistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median @?* (50th percentile),. 28 MPH kjerage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 NM 95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 PH Haber of Vehicles in Pace 433 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 73.02% X@r of Vehicles ) 55 WR 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00% a3-Liwi-i"n s-L"noo 2 a ed -- @099126606, WOJA Wezo:LL 966L 'TL-ltj V epsinqi CITY OF TEXECUIK COL'ffS UNLINITL7D s te code@: 152502 COSKIC/BRT TWILIGHT NORTH ST@R 909.247.6716 s.tart,Dat@: 03/22/96 @ile I.D. 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY : TECOSBPI scc P<Iioe 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @hl 85th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 111:00 03 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 !32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1 24 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 32 :34 05:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 '5 24 29 06.00 0 0 0 0 4 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 @7 271 34 07:00 0 0 0 0 6 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 281 @33 08,00 0 0 0 0 9 20 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 @7 28! 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 @3 281 @34 10-.OO 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,b 281 32 11:00 0 0 0 0 5 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 33 12:00 pi: 0 0 0 2 11 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 27 32 oi:oo 0 0 0 4 3 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 27 33 02:00 0 0 0 3 a 18 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 271 33 03:00 0 0 0 4 9 27 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 271 32 04:00 1 0 0 1 2 9 20 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 32 05:00 0 0 0 1 5 25 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 34 06:00 0 0 0 3 12 26 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 33 07:00 0 0 0 3 6 15 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 2@ 33 08:00 0 0 1 4 3 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 & 2 7, 32 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@, 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 10 4 0 a 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 31 11:00 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .6 26 29 Day Tot@ 2 30 112 249 176 32 1 1 6( 2 21 Totais 0 0 2 30 112 248 176 32 1 0 0 0 1 6(2 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median @ (-'Oth Mcentile): 28 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed : 36 KPII 10 El Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH @r of Vehicles in Pace : 424 cent of Vehicles in Pace 70.41t per Nwber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: ODt t,09 St, Z 05 6 0 6 (E3-Llwl-]Nn SiNnoo -6-d -- -70913',26606, --'A --ZO-LL 966L 'LL ILDV A@p@,llq- COUIFTS UNLIMITED ite Cod 152502 COSMIC/B I ET TWILIGHT )IORTH STAR 909.247.6716 tart . Dat@: 03/23/M 7 DAY SF , EED SURVEY ile I.D.@ TEXSBPI Ne ; I 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50tl' 85th 1 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot 1 pct . @t, 12:00 03/23 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2@ 32 OL.,OO 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2@ 32 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 34 03:DO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 04-00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 3 2 34 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32 06:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 21 37 07:00 0 0 0 2 3 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 @1 2f 33 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 3 7 10 11 3 0 0 0 @4 2@ 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 20 31 4 33 10:00 0 0 0 2 3 11 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 1 1 2 15 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 33 12:00 p' 0 0 0 1 6 14 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 33 oi:oo 0 0 1 4 6 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 32 02:00 0 0 0 2 6 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 32 03:00 0 0 1 2 8 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2@ 33 04:00 0 0 0 1 13 20 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 2 32 05:00 0 0 0 1 11 16 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 J3 28 33 06:00 0 0 0 2 8 19 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 8 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@ 33 08'.00 0 0 0 1 6 12 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33 09:00 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 36 lo.-Do 0 0 0 1 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 33 11:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 $3 34 Day Totals 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 6.6 21 Totals 0 0 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 0 0 0 0 6 .6 s@ @tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 UH Median @d (50th percentile): 28 WE Average Speed - All Vehicles : 29 MPH 85th Percentile Speed : 33 MPH 95th Percentile Speed : 36 UH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Nw&r of Vehicles in Pace : 427 Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 69.21@t K@ of Vehicles > 55 )n : a Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 @o -d (X3-LIWI-INn s.LNnoo 6-id -- '10991726606, --I --ZO-LL 966L 'LL 1,,dv A.P@1,14.1 CITY Of TEMMU COUNTS UNLIMITED ite @C04 : 152502 t@ Date. 6 /24/96 @IC/BEY TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 3 7 DAY SKED SURVEY tile';I.D.1 TECOSBPL SOUTHBOBND -tage @50 35th Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- . i Tin i 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totil Pctl Pct. 12.,OO 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24' 28 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 34 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 :5 2@ 31 06:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 37 07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 33 32 08:00 0 0 0 2 8 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @3 20 09:00 0 0 0 1 5 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @8 21 32 10:00 0 0 0 2 4 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 )1 2@ 32 11:00 0 0 1 4 a 16 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 21 32 12:00 pik, 0 0 0 1 7 20 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 32 01:00 0 0 0 5 9 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 24 32 0 02:00 0 0 0 1 10 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 32 03:00 0 0 0 0 9 24 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 21 32 04.00 0 0 0 3 5 20 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 2@ 32 O@:uu u 0 0 3 8 15 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 6 19 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 11 23 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 33 09,00 0 0 0 2 7 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2@ 33 3 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 2@ 33 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34 11:00 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 33 Day Totals 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 k 5@8 2 Totals 0 0 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 0 0 0 0 5 s@ s@tistics, 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median (50th percentile): 27 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles : 28 MM 85th Percentile Speed : 33 PR 95th Percentile Speed : 35 MPE 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 PR N@r of Vehicles in Pace : 405 Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 68.76t of Vehicles > 55 MM : 0 Percent of Veb-icles > 55 KPH: .00% 9 0 A 6,SOCI (i@-Liwi-ii-4n s-LNno:D 9 a6ed -- @099'7Z5606, WOJA we?O:LL 956L 'LL l@jdv Aepsinqi CM OF:TEKECULA COUKTS UMUNITED 152502 ODSHIC/T TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 63/25/96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSBPL SOUTHMD Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 11- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- ;50th $5th Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totial ;Pct@ Pct. 12:00 01/25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2, 34 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 29 .6 22 29 06:00 0 0 0 3 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 2@ 33 08:00 0 0 0 0 a 22 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 4.8 2@ 33 09:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 2@ 34 10:00 0 0 0 0 7 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 @5 2@ 32 LL:DO 0 0 1 1 13 10 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 2@. 33 12:00 p4 0 0 0 0 4 21 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 2@ 33 01:00 0 0 0 2 10 8 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 33 02:00 0 0 0 3 10 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 03:00 0 0 1 1 8 23 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 28 33 04:00 0 0 2 1 6 26 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 21 32 05:00 0 0 0 1 9 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 23 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 12 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 27 33 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 7 3 36 08:00 0 0 0 1 6 8 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 6 2 37 5 09:00 0 0 0 1 4 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 10.00 0 0 0 2 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 3- 34 Day Totads 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 5@8 2 Totals 0 0 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 0 0 0 0 5.8 SDeed S@tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH Median Speed (5ft percentile); 28 MPH kvp-rage @ - All Vehicles 29 85th Percentile Speed 33 KM 95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vehicles in Pace 387 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.841 N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 t-098 t, Z6 60.5 (,3-Liwi-iF4n S-LNnoo Z a6ed -- @092'726606, -JA WEZO:LL 966L CrTy OF. COUFM URJMITFD @ite-Cod( : 152502 CDSHIC/AET TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Star@ Dale: 93/26/96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSEP1 Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- :50t 8,5th Tile 5 10 15 20 25 IQ 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 To@l :Pct@ Pct. 12:00 01/26 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 oi-oo 0 2 32 34 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 r4 3 33 05:00 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 2 34 06:00 0 0 0 2 2 11 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 @2 2 134 07:00 0 0 1 2 5 9 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 2 34 08:00 0 1 1 1 10 30 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 61 2 32 09:00 0 1 0 1 a 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 3 9 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 11:00 0 0 0 0 a 12 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 33 12-00 pl 0 1 0 3 9 14 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 2@ 33 Ol-.00 0 0 3 2 6 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 2( 32 02:00 1 0 0 4 11 20 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 @1 2-, 33 03:00 0 0 0 0 13 30 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 33 04:00 0 0 1 4 1 19 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 33 05:00 0 0 1 2 10 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 32 06:00 0 0 0 3 12 29 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 33 07:00 0 0 0 1 5 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 21 33 08.00 0 0 0 1 8 11 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 09:00 0 0 0 1 7 12 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 33 0 4 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 10@,00 0 0 0 2" '33 11.00 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 34 Day Totals 1 3 a 28 128 282 215 42 2 79 24 Totals 1 3 8 28 129 292 215 42 2 0 0 a 0 7@ s6tistics. 15th Percentile Speed 22 WH Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 PR Aver@ Speed - All Vebicles 29 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 33 RH 9,5th Percentile S@ 36 M 10 MPfi Pace Speed 26-35 MPH Nwiber of Vehicles in Place 497 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.02% N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001 a3-Liwi-i"n s-LNnoo 9 a6ed -- 1098'726606, woja wezo:Lt 966L 'LL It v Aepsj,,qi @ii CITY OF TEMMU COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite Cm : 152502 CMIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 tart e: 03/27/96 7 DAY SPEED SURVEY ile,I.D TEMSBPI SOUTHBOUNI) aael Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- ;50tl 85th Tile 5 10 15 0 35 40 45 50 5 60 999 Totil Pct. Pct. 12.-OO O@127 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 139 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 34 34 02.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 03:00 2 3; 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 34 06:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 !1 21 33 07:00 0 1 0 4 a 13 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 21 33 08:00 0 0 0 2 9 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 @8 2.1 32 09,.OO 0 0 0 0 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2@ 32 10:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 2" 33 11:00 0 0 1 1 5 15 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2( 33 12:00 pa 0 0 1 3 4 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 @3 2-@ 32 01:00 0 1 0 3 4 4 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 3( 33 02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2, 32 03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33 Totals 0 2 3 17 61 132 113 20 1 0 0 0 0 3@4 S@d @tistim, 15th Percentile S @ d 22 MPH Median S@ (50th percentile): 28 RP]l Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 KPH 85th Percentile speed 33 PH 95th Percentile 5@ 36 KPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH @r of Vehicles in Pace 250 Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.421 Nuga of vehicles > 55 WH 0 Percent of Vehicles 55 MPH: .00% 60 -li a3llWl-lHn s-LNfio3 @6 a6ed -- lO92'7Z6606, wojj wezo:LL 966L 'L It, V Apsn'41 ,KPPE DI)C 44cil 507 -32- Div. 1 Relevant Market Area 507. The 'relevant market area' is any area within a radius of 10 miles from the site of a potential new dealership. Added Ch. 996, Stats@ 1973. Operfitive July 1, 1974. Remanufactured Vehicle uct 507.5. A"remanufacturedvehicle"isaveliiclethathasbeenconstr ed by a licensed remanufacturer and consists of any used or reconditioned integral parts, including, but not limited to, frame, engine, transmission, axles, brakes, or suspension. Remanufactured vehicles may be sold under a distinctive trade name. An existing vehicle which is incidently repaired, restored, or modified by replacing or adding parts or accessories is not a remanufactured vehicle. Added Ch. 1286, Stat-4. 1983. Effective.january 1, 1984. Remanufacturer 507.8. A'remanufacturer"isanypersonwlioforcommission,money,or other thing of value, produces a vehicle that consists of any used or reconditioned integral parts, including, but not limited to, frame, engine, transmission, axles, brakes, or suspension which is subject to registra tion under this code. A remanufacturer is not a person who incidently repairs, restores, or modifies an existing vehicle by replacing or adding parts or accessories. Added Ch. 1286, Stats. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984. Renter 508. A 'renter' is a person who is engaged in the business of renting, leasing or bailing vehicles for a term not exceeding four months and for a fixed rate or price. Added Ch. 1284, Stats. 1976. Effective,lanuary 1, 1977. Repair Shop 510. A 'repair shop' is a place where vehicles subject to registration under this code are repaired, rebuilt, reconditioned, repainted, or in any way maintained for the public at a charge. Representative 512.A 'representative' is any person regularly employed by a i manufacturer or distributor for the purpose of negotiating or promoting the . I sale of the manufacturer's or distributor's vehicles to their franchisees or for regularly supervising or contacting franchisees or prospective franchisees in this state for any purpose. Added Ch. 996, Stats. 1973. Operative July 1, 1974. t Residence L)istrict I 515. A'residencedistrict"isthatportionofahighwayandtheproperty contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which " highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is Occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or buliireas structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a rm'@e if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures tr the length of the highway exists. Div. 1 -33- 527 Resident 516.'Resident' means any person who manifests an intent to live o be r located in this state on more than a temporary or transient basis. Presence in the state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency. i@ The following are evidence of residency for purposes of vehicle registration: (a)Address where registered to vote. (b)Location of employment or place of business. (c)Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education, (d)Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school. tion. (e)Filing a homeowner's property tax exemp (f)Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence. (g)Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or @l benefit not ordinarily extended to a nonresident. (h)Possession of a California driver's license, he state I (i) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in t ' , d is more than temporary or transient. i) Added Ch. 409, Stats. lc)83. Effective January 1, 1984. Amended Ch. 13, StaL,. 1991. Effective February 13, 1991 by terms of an urgency cinuqe. Retail Sale 520. A 'retail sale' is a sale of goods to a person for the purpose of consumption and use, an(] not for resate to others, including, but not limited to, an arrangement where a motor vehicle is consigned to a dealer for sile, Added Ch. 1284, Stats. 1976. Effective January 1, 1977, Retarder 521. A 'retarder' is a device, other than a brake, which, when activated by the driver, applier, a retarding force to the wheels of a vehicle without the use Of friction. A retarder may be installed in or on the engine, exhaust system, drive train, or wheels of a motor vehicle, or an axle or wheels of a towed vehicle. A retarder May operate by altering the valve timing of the engine, by controlling the flow of a circulating fluid, by applying an electromagnetic force, by controlling the release of gases from the exhaust system, or by other means. A retarder may or may not be capable of stopping the vehicle upon which it is installed. 'i Added Ch. 648, Stats. lg()I. Fffective January 1, 1992. i Ridesharing 522. 'Ridesharing' means two or more persons traveling by any i-nodp, including, but not limited to, carpooling, vanpooling, buspooling, taxipooling, jitney, and public transit. Added Ch, i85, Stats. 1982. FfTective January 1, 1983. supersedes Ch. 46. , ; i Amended Ch. 193, Stats. 198 I. Effective January 1, 1985. Right-of-way 525. "Right-of-way'itheprivilegeoftlieimmediateuseofthehigliway. Road 527. (a) 'Road' means any existing vehicle route established before January 1, 1979, with significant evidence of prior regular travel by vehicles subject to registration Pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Chapter 1 of Division 3; provided, that a road' does not mean any route traversed exclusively by bicycles as defined in Section 39001, motorcycles as defined in Section 400, motor-driven cycles as defined in Section 405, or off- highway motor vehicles as defined in Section 38012. 22113 @46- Div. 11 system shall not be operated at any place where traffic is controlled by a traffic officer or official traffic control signal. The schoolbus flashing red signal lights, ainber warning lights, and stop signal arm system shall not be operated at any other time. (b) The driver shall stop to load or unload pupils only at a schoolbus stop designated forpupils by the school district superintendent or authorized by the superintendent for school activity trips. (c) When pupils need to cross a highway or private road upon which the schoolbus is stopped, at a location where traffic is not controlled by a traffic officer or official traffic control signal, the driver shall do all of the following: (1) Check for approaching traffic in all directions and activate the flashing red light signal system and stop signal arm, as defined in Section 25257, if equipped with a stop signal arm, only when safe to do so. (2) Before opening the door, ensure that the flashing red signal lights and stop signal arm are activated, and that it is safe to exit the schoolbus. (3) Escort all pupils in prekindergarten, kindergarten, or any of grades 1, to 8, inclusive, across the highway or private road. The driver shall use an approved hand-held STOP sign while escorting all pupils. (4) Require all pupils to walk in front of the bus as they cross the highway or private road. (5) Ensure that all pupils who need to cross the highway or private road have crossed safely, and that all other unloaded pupils andpedestrians are a safe distance from the bus and it is safe to move before setting the bus in motion. (d) A school district may designate selected schoolbus stops as stops that may reqt4rire the activation of the @hing red light as required in subdivision (a) even though there are no pupils crossing the roadway. These stops shall only be so designated because they present unique traffi-c hazards which can only be addressed by the use of the @hing red lights. No school district shall designate a schoolbus stop under this subdivision without the prior approval of the department and the agency having traly-tc engineering responsibility for the street on which the stop is located. Amended Ch. 553, Stats. 1977. Effective January 1, 1978. Amended Ch. 813, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982. Amended Ch. 624, Stats. 1992. Efrective September 14, 1992 by terms ofan urgency clause. Amended Ch. 831, Stats. 1994. Effective September 27, 1994, by terms oran urgency clause. The 19q4 Hmendment added the italicized material, and at the point(s) indicated, deleted the following: 1. 'the' 2. a. Local Authorities 22113. This chapter does not prevent local authorities, by ordinance, from prohibiting the making of any turning movement by any vehicle at any intersection or between any designated intersections. Div. 11 @47- 22350 C R 7. SPEED LAws Article 1. Generally Excessive Speed and Designated Lane Use 22348. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 22351, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway with a speed limit established pursuant to Section 22349 or 22356 at a speed greater than that speed limit. (b) Any person who drives a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 100 miles per hour is guilty of an infraction punishable, as follows: (1) Upon a first conviction of a violation of this subdivision, by a fine of not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). The court may also suspend the privilege of the person to operate a motor vehicle for a period not to exceed 30 days pursuant to Section 13200.5. (2) Upon a conviction under this subdivision of an offense which occurred within three years of a prior offense resulting in a conviction of an offense under this subdivision, by a fine of not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). The person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shah be suspended by the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 13355. (3) Upon a conaction under this subdivision of an offense which occurred within five years of two or more prior offenses resulting in convictions of offenses under this subdivision, by a fine of not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). The person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended by the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to subdivision (b) of Seci.ion 13355. (c) Any vehicle subject to Section 22406 shall be driven in a lane designated pursuant to Section 21655, or if no lane has been so designated, in the right-hand lane for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand edge or curb. When ov4r.taking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction, the drivers shall use either the designated lane, the lane to the @' I @mmediate left of the right-hand lane, or the right-hand lane for tramc as permitted under this code. If, however, specific lane or lanes have not been designated on a divided highway having four or more clearly marked lanes for traffic in one direction, any such vehicle may also be driven in the lane to the immediate left of the right-hand lane, unless otherwise prohibited under thii code. This subdivision does not apply to a driver who is preparing for a left-or right-hand turn or who is in the process of entering into or exiting from a highway or to a driver who is required necessarily to drive in a lane other than the right-hand lane to continue on his or her intended route. Added Ch. 1218, Stats. 1973. OpcrRtive January 1, 1974. Amended Ch. 153, Stats. 1975. Effective June 28, 1975 by terms of an urgency clilu-te. Amended Ch. 217, Stats. 1978. Effective June 8, 1978 by terms of an urgency clauqe. Amended Ch. 980, Stats. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984. Amended Ch. 276, Stats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985, Amended Ch. 72, Stats. 1987. Effective June 30, 1987, by terms of an urgency c]Fiu,.ie. Super- sedes Ch. 25. Maximum Speed Limit 22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour. Added Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 1735, Stats. 1963. EtY'cctive September 20, 1963. ,L-t:ended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective Mav 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency cloure. Bask @L'-ed Law @ 2235@7No r"sonshalldriveavehicleuponahighwnyataspeedgrefiter than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the, traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a 22351 -648- Div. 11 speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Amended Ch. 252, StRts. 1963. EfTective September 20, 1963. Speed Law Violations 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limitsspecified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawfulunless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b)The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. its are as follows and shall be applicable in this code and, if so changed, only when signs ice thereof- (1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last loo feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but do-es not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley. -r bQ Lb) TwentX-fi ].q p v,- ml llr,- (1)On any hi hway @ther than a state hiL7'hway, in any business or resinless a diiierent Speed is determined by local aut onty undet forth in this code. (2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard 'SCHOOL@ warning sign, whil children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours oer during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL' warning sign. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street othl Ir than a state highway and posted with a standard 'SENIOR" warning sign, A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency in akes a determination that the proposed Signing should be implemented. A local authority may however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection ofthose' signs. Amended Ch. 1996, Stats. 1959.1959. Effectiveseptember 18, 1959. Supersedes Ch. 11. Amended Ch. 530, Stats. I()6 I. Effective September 15,196 1. Div. 1 1 -649- 22356 Amended Ch. 409, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20,1963. Supersedes Ch. 397. Amended Ch. 813, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982. Amended Ch. r>42, Stats, 1990. Effective January 1, 1991. Supersedes Ch. 441. Decrease of State Highway Limits 22354, Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 55 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30 or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Efrective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 645, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 25, SL&ts. 1987. Effective @lay 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause. Speed Limit Change: Consultation and Consideration Requirements 22354.5. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department ofthe California Highway Patrol. (b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The Department oftransportation shall take into consideration the results ofthe public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the spe@ limit. Added Ch. 219, Stats. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992. Variable Speed Limits 22355. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any state highway which is a freeway will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits, the department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which signs shall be so designed as to permit d . isplay of different speed limits at various times of the day or night. Such signs need not conform to the standards and specifications established by regulations of the Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400, but shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit. The speed limit upon the freeway at a particular time Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective Septfmber 18,1959. and place shall be that which is then and there displayed upon such sign. Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1973. Effective JFnuary 1, 1974. Increase of Freeway Limit 22356. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation, after consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, determines upon the basis of in engineering and traffic survey on existing ( ) I highway segments, or upon the basis of appropriate design standards and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed ( ) I highway 22357 -650- Div. 11 segments, that a speed greater than 55 miles per hour would facilitate the 0 rderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any state highway, or portion thereof, 2 that is I otherwise subject to a maximum speed limit of 55 miles per hour, the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the Department of the Califo mia Highway Patrol, may declare a higher maximum speed of 60 or 65 miles per hour for vehicles not subject to Section 22406, and shall cause appropriate signs to be erected giving notice thereof. The Department of Transportation shall only make a determination under this section that is fully consistent with, and in full compliance with, federal law. (b) No person shall drive a vehicle upon that highway at a speed greater than 60 or 65 miles per hour, as posted. Repealed Ch. I 1, stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Added Ch. 1735, Stgts. 1963, Effective September 20, 1963. Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Effective November 8,1967. Amended Ch. 632, Stats. 1969. Effective November 10, 1969. Supersedes Ch. 91 and Ch. 138. Amendp,d Ch. 545, StaLq. 1975. Effective January 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 579, Stats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985. Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause. Amended Ch. 41, Stats. 1988. Effective March 18, 1988, by terms of an urgency clause. Amended Ch. 1220, Statg. 1994. Effective September 30, 1994, by terms of an urgency clause. The 1994 amendment adile(I the italicized material, and at the point(s) indicated, deleted the following 1.'freeway" 2.'which' 3.'a freeway with full control ofaccess and without crossings at grade' Increase of Local Limits 22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 55 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of tramc and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The provisions of this section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. Amended Ch. 11, Statq. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 631, Stats. 1969. EfFective November 10, 1969. Amended Ch. 25, Statg. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause. Amended Ch. 542, StFits. 1990. Efrective January 1, 1991. Supersed es Ch. 441. Decrease Near Childron's Playgrounds 22357.1. Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 miles per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted. Added Ch. 508, Slats, 1989. Effective January 1, 1990. [-Decrease of Local Limits 22358. Whenev@r a local authority determines upon the basis of an Div. 11 @51- 22359 engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more highway where the limit of 55 miles per hour is applicable, the local than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state M' authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed li it of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found mo t appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, 'Which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency clause. Decrease on Narrow Street 22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. Added Ch. 1614, Stats. 1%5. Effective September 17, 1965. kmended Ch. 1095, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Supersedes Ch. 372. Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers 22358.4. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by such survey. The ordinance or resolution shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. Added Ch. 102, Stats. 1974. Effective Januory 1, 1975. Amended Ch. r>42, Stats. 1990. Effective January 1, 1991. Supersedes Ch. 441. Downward Speed Zoning@ 22358.5. ItistheintentoftheLegi-.3laturethatphysicalconditionssuch as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Added Ch. II, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1951). Boundary Line Streets 22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. Tlii@-, section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. Amended Ch. 209, Stats. 1963. Effective Apt if 29, 1963. 22360 @52- Div. 11 Linking Districts on Local Highways 22360. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between districts, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 55 miles per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway. Amended Ch. II, Sta tm. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency cl Ruse. Multiple-Lane Highways 22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive. Amended Ch. 209, Stats. 1.%3. Effective April 29, 1963. Speed Limit Where Per-sons at Work 22362. It is prima facie a violation of the basic speed law for any person to operate a vehicle in excess of the posted speed limit upon any portion of a highway where officers or employees of the agency having jurisdiction of the same, or any contractor of the agency or his employees, are at work on the t roadway or within the right-of-way so close thereto as to be endangered by passing traffic. This section applies only when appropriate signs, indicating the limits of the restricted zone, and the speed limit applicable therein, are placed by such agency within 400 feet of each end of such zone. The signs shall display the figures indicating the applicable limit, which shall not be less than 25 miles per hour, and shall indicate the purpose of the speed restriction. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to relieve any operator of a vehicle from complying with the basic speed law. Amended Ch. 515, Stats. 1970. Effective November 23, 1970. Restrictions Because of Snow or ice Conditions 22363. Notwitlistanding any speed limit that may be in effect upon the highway, the Department of Transportation in respect to state highways, or a local authority with respect to highways under its jurisdiction, may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe basei'- on the prevailing snow or ice conditions upon such highway or any portion thereof. Signs may be placed and removed as snow or ice conditions vary. Amended Ch. 515, Slats. 1970. Effective November 23, 1970. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Lane Speed Limits 22364. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any state highway will be facilitated by the establishment of different speed limits for the various lanes of traffic, the department may place signs upon the state highway, or any portion thereof. The signs shall designate the speed limits for each of the lanes of traffic. Adiled Ch. 1542, Stats. 1965. Effective September 17, 1965. Amended Ch. 545, StnLq. 1974. Effective irnuary 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 681, Stats. 1982. Efrective January 1, 1983. Div. 11 @53- 22402 Locally Imposed Prima Facie Speed Limit 22365. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision, of law, tny county or city, which is contained, in whole or in par4 within the South Coast Air Quality Management District, may, if the count.i, or city deter7nines that it is necessary to achieve or maintain state or federal ambient air quality standards lbr particulate matter, determine and declare by ordinance apr-ima facie speed limit that is lower than that which the county or city is otherwise permitted by this code to establish, for any unpaved road within thejur-isdictiori of the county or city and within the district That declared pr-ima fricie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice ther-eof ar-e erected along the road- (b) 7his section shall remain in effect only until Januar-y 1, 1.1)97, and as of that date is repeated unless a later enacted statute, wh ich is enacted before January 1, 1997, deletes or extends that date. Added Ch. 024, Stats. 1994. Effective September 28, 1994, by terms of an urgency clnuse. Repealed Ch. 924, St-atm. 1994. Effective September 28, 1994. Operative January 1, 1997@ NOTE:This section shall remain In effect only until January 1, 1997, nnd as ofthat date is repealed unless a later enacted statute, which Is enacted beforeJan . uary 1, 1997, deletes or extends that date. Article 2. Other Speed Laws Minimum Speed Law 22400. (a) No person shall drive upon a highway at such a slow spee,l as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, unles.- the reduced speed is necessary for safe operation, because of a grade, 01- in compliance with law. No person shall bring a vehicle to q complete stop upon a highway so n -, to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law. (b) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that slow speeds on any part of a st ate highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit below which no person shall drive a vehicle, except when necessary for 5,afe operation or in compliance with law, when appropriate signs giving n('t,ice thereof are erected along the part of the highway for which a minimum si,-ed limit is established. Subdivision (b) of this section shall apply only to vehicles subject to registration. Amended Ch. 1304, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 364, Stats. 1979. Effective January 1, 1980. Traffic Signals 22401. Local authorities in timing traffic signals may so regulate the, timing thereof as to permit the movement of traffic in an orderly and -qfe, manner at speeds slightly at variance from the speed otherwise applicable under this code. Bridges and Structures 22402. TheDepartmentofTransl)ortationmay,inthemannerprovi,i-@ in Section 22404 determine the maximum speed, not less than five milef I)ei- hour, which can be maintained with -safety to any bridge, elevated stz-uct @ire, tube, or tunnel on a state highwa.@-. Said department may also inal-- a ;62403 Div. 11 determination with reference to any other highway upon receiving a request therefor from the board of supervisors or road commissioner of the county, the governing body of the local authority having jurisdiction over the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel. Amended Ch. 645, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Local Bridges and Structures 22403. Any local authority may, in the manner provided in Section 22404, determine the maximum speed, not less than five miles per hour, which can be maintained with safety to any bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel under its jurisdiction, or may request the Department of Transportation to make such determination. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Revision of Speed Limit on Bridges and Structures 22404. The Department of Transportation or l@ authority making a determination of the maximum safe speed upon a bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel shall first make an engineering investigation and shall hold a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be posted upon the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel at least five days before the date fixed for the hearing. Upon the basis of the investigation and all evidence presented at the hearing, the department or local authority shall determine by order in writing the maximum speed which can be maintained with safety to the bridge, elevated structure, tube or tunnel. Thereupon, the authority having jurisdiction over the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel shall erect and maintain suitable signs specifying the maximum speed so determined at a distance of not more than 500 feet from each end of the bridge, elevated structure, tube, tunnel, or any approach thereto. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Violations on Bridges and Structures 22405. (a) No person shall drive a vehicle on any bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel constituting a part of a highway, at a speed which is greater than the maximum speed which can be maintained with safety to such structure. ITT- (b) Upon the trial of any person charged with a violation of this section with respect to a sign erected under Section 22404, proof of the determination of the maximum speed by the Department of Transportation or local authority and the erection and maintenance of the speed signs shall constitute prima facie evidence of the maximum speed which can be maintained with safety to the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. E(Tective January 1, 1975. Maximum Speed for Designated Vehicles 22406. No person shall drive any of the following vehicles on a highway at a speed in excess of 55 miles per hour: (a) A motortruck or truck tractor having three or more axles or any motortruck or truck tractor drawing any other vehicle. (b)A passenger vehicle or bus drawing any other vehicle. (c)A schoolbus transporting any school pupil. (d)A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers. (e)A vehicle transporting explosives. (f)A trailer bus, as defined in Section 636. Amended Ch. 2134, Statg. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959, Amended Ch. 62, Stats. 1961. Effective September 15, 1961. Amended Ch. 376, Stats. 1963. EfTective September 20, 196.1. Div. 11 -655- 22413 Repealed and added Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Effective November 8, 1967. Amended Ch. 676, Stata. 1980. Effective January 1, 1981. Amended Ch. 843, Stata. 1988. EffL-ctive January 1, 1989. Tank Vehicle Driver Penalties 22406.5.Any person who drives a tank vehicle subject to Division 14.7 (commencingwith Section 34000) while transporting more than 500 gallons of flammableliquid at a speed greater than the applicable speed limit or in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is, in addition to any other applicable penalty, subject to a fine of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) for a first offense and, for a second or subsequent offense within two years of a prior offense, to a fine of not less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) and a suspension of up to six months of a hazardous materials or cargo tank endorsement, or both. Added Ch. 1043, Stata. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992. Decreasing Truck Speed Limit 22407, Whenever the Department of Transportation or local authority determines upon the basis of engineering studies and a traffic survey that the speed of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in subdivision (a) of Section 22406 which have a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, in descending a grade upon any portion of a highway, the department or local authority, with respect to highways under their respective jurisdiction, may determine and declare a speed limit of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25 or 20 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared speed limit shall be effective for such vehicles when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. Amended Ch. 1210, Stats, 1965. Effective September 17, 1965. Supersedes Ch. 184. Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Efrective November 8,1967. Amended Ch. 82, St.ats. 1973. Effective January 1, 1974. Solid Tire . 22409. No person shall operate any vehicle equipped with any solid tire when such vehicle has a gross weight as set forth in the following table at any speed in excess of the speed set forth opposite such gross weight: When gross Maximum speed weight of vehicle in miles and load is: per hour: 10,000 lbs. or more but less than 16,000 lbs 25 16,000 lbs. or more but less than 22,000 lbs 15 22,000 lbs. or more 12 Metal Tires 22410. Nopersonshalloperateanyvehicleequippedwithanymetaltire in contact with the surface of the highway at a speed in excess of six miles per hour. - Decreasing Speed Limit on Grades 22413. Whenever a local -authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour is more than is reasonable and safe onqny portion of a street having a grade in excess of 10 percent, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a maximum limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared maximum speed shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon 40611 -1076- Div. 17 Div. 17 -1077- 40802 (b)Pursuant to subdivision (a), a notice to correct violation shall be issued ; I Misdemeanor to Willfully Fail to Correct or Deliver Proof as provided in this section or a notice to appear shall be issued as provided in Section 40522, unless the officer finds any of the following: 40616. Any person willfu ly violating a written promise to correct or (1) Evidence of fraud or persistent neglect. it Willfully failing to deliver proof of correction of violation is guilty of a misdemeanor. Proof of c' (2) The violation presents an immediate safety hazard. orrection may consist of a certification by an (3) The violator do-es not agree to, or cannot, promptly correct the authorized representative of one of the following agencies that the alleged violation. ' ! violation has been corrected: (c) If any of the conditions set forth in subdivision (b) exist, the (a) Brake, lamp, smog device, or muffler violations may be certified as y ny procedures specified in this section or Section 40522 are inapplicable, and corrected b a station'licensed to inspect and certify for the violation pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 9889.15) of Chapter 20.3 of the officer may take other appropriate enforcement action. (d) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a), the notice to c Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and Section 27150.2. orrect (b) Driver license and registration violations may be certified as corrected violation shall be on a form approved by the Judicial Council and, in addition to the owner's or operator's address and identifying information, Shall by the Department of Motor Vehicles or by any clerk or deputy clerk of a contain an estimate of the reasonable time required for correction and proof court. of correction of the particular defect, not to exceed 30 days. (c) Any violation maybe certified as corrected by a police department, the Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. @TEltiVe July 1, 1979. California Highway Patrol, sheriff, marshal, or other law enforcement Amendcd Ch. 7 1, Stats. 1979. Effective May 19, 1979 by terms of an urgency clause. agency regularly engaged in enforcement of the Vehicle Code. Amended Ch. 399, Stata. 1980. Effective July 11, 1980 by terms of an urgency clause. Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979. Amended Ch. 402, Stats. 1982. Efrective January 1, 1983. Supersedes Ch. 466. Anmnded Ch. 361, State. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984. Amended Ch. 915, Stats. 1984. Effective July 1, 1985. Amended Ch. 898, Stata. 1985. Effective January 1, 1986. Signed Notice as Complaint Amended Ch. 729, Stats. 1989. Effective January 1, 19%. Amended Ch. 90, Slats. 1991. Effective June 30, I()91 by means ofan urgency clause. 40618. Whenever proof of correction of violation is not received by the Amended Ch. 258, Slats. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993. 1 issuing agency in accordance with Section 40610, the issuing agency may deliver the signed promise to the court having jurisdiction of the violation Proof of Correction of Violation: Tr-ansaction Fee with a certification that no proof of correction has been received. If prepared 40611. Upon proof of correction of an alleged violation of Section 12500 ' I on a form approved by the Judicial Council, the promise under Section or 12951, or any violation cited pursuant to Section 40610, the clerk shall 40610, together with the certification under this section, shall constitute a collect a ten dollar ($10) transaction fee for each case. The fee shall be complaint to which the defendant may enter a plea, and upon which a deposited by the clerk in accordance with Section 68084 of the Goverrunent warrant may be issued if the complaint is verified. Code, and allocated monthly as follows: Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979. (a)Thirty-three percent shall be transferred to the local goverrunental entity in whose jurisdiction the citation was issued for deposit in the general C 3. IL-LEGAL EVI]DENCE fund of the entity. (b) Thirty-four percent shall be transferred to the State Treasury for Article 1. Prosecutions Under Code deposit in the State Penalty Fund established by Section 1464 of the Penal Code. Vohkie and Uniform Used by Officers (c) Thirty-three percent shall be deposited in the county general fund. 40800. Every traffic officer on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of enforcing the provisions of Division 10 or 11 of this code shall wear a full (d)No fee shall be imposed pursuant to this section if the violation notice is processed only by the issuing agency and no record of the distinctive uniform, and if the officer while so on duty uses a motor vehicle, action is transmitted to the cour-t. it must be painted a distinctive color specified by the commissioner. Added Ch. 90, Stats. 1991. Effective June 30,1991 by means ofan urgency clause. This section does not apply to an officer assigned exclusively to the duty Amended Ch. 189, Stats. 199 1, Effective July 29, 1991 by means of an urgency clause. of investigating and securing evidence in reference to any theft of a vehicle Amended Ch. 613, Stats. 1991. EffL-ctive January 1, 1992. or failure of a person to stop in the event of an accident or violation of Section Amended Ch. 427, Stata. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993. Amended Ch. 704, gtats. 1994. Effective January 1, 1995. 23169 or in reference td any felony charge, or to any officer engaged in The 1994 amendment added the italicized material. serving any warrant when'the officer is not engaged in patrolling the highways for the purpose of enforcing the traffic laws. Copy of Notice Amended Ch. 202, Stats. 196 1. Effective September 15, 196 1. 40612. An exact, legible copy of the notice to correct shall be delivered to @i Speed Trap Prvhibftion the alleged violator at the time he or she signs such notice. Added Ch. 1350, Slats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979. 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any Misdemeanor to Sign with False or Fictitious Name alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing 40614. Any person who signs a notice to correct or a certificate of evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or correction with a false or fictitious name is guilty of a misdemeanor. prosecution under this code. Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979. Spood Trap speed trap' is either of the following: 40803 -1078- Div. 17 (a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (b) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22354, 22357,22358, or 22358.3, which speed limit is notjustified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects. This subdivision does not apply to local streets and roads. For purposes of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal-aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions: @1) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (2) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (3) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. Amended Ch. 1346, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Amended Ch. 203, Stats. 1973. Effective Jul. 9, 1973, by terms of an urgency clause. Amended Ch. 1210, Stats. 1978. Effective January 1, 1979. Repealed Ch. 1210, Stutz. 1978. Operative January 1, 1982. Amended Ch. 357, Stats. 198 1. Effective January 1, 1982. Repealed Ch. 357, Stats. 1981. Operative January 1, 1987. Amended Ch. 833, StoLq. 1986. Effective January 1, 1987. Amended Ch. 459, Stats. 199 1. Effective January 1, 1992. Speed Trap Evidence 40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. Amended Ch. 357, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982. Amended Ch. 459, Stats. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992. Amended Ch. 638, Stats, 1992. Effective January 1, 1993. Testimony Based on Speed Trap I Al 40804. (a) In any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, any officer or other person shall be incompetent as a Div. 17-1079- 40808 witness if the testimony is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) Every officer arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, a person so charged while on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of enforcing the provisions of Divisions 10 and 11 is incompetent as a witness if at the time of such arrest he was not wearing a distinctive uniform, or was using a motor vehicle not painted the distinctive color specified by the commissioner, This section does not apply to an officer assigned exclusively to the duty of investigating and securing evidence in reference to any theft of a vehicle or failure of a person to stop in the event of an accident or violation of Section 23109 or in reference to any felony charge or to any officer engaged in serving any warrant when the officer is not engaged in patrolling the highways for the purpose of enforcing the traffic laws. Amended Ch. 68, Stats. 1961. Effective September 15, 1961. Amended Ch. 94, Stats. 1978. Effective January 1, 1979. Admission of Speed Trap Evidence 40805. Everycourtshallbewithoutjurisdictiontorenderajudgrnentof conviction against any person for a violation of this code involving the speed of a vehicle if the court admits any evidence or testimony secured in violation of, or which is inadmissible under this article. Police Repoifs 40806. In the event a defendant charged with an offense under this code pleads guilty, the trial court shall not at any time prior to pronouncing sentence receive or consider any report, verbal or written, of any police or traffic officer or witness of the offense without fully informing the defendant of all statements in the report or statement of witnesses, or without giving the defendant an opportunity to make answer thereto or to produce witnesses in rebuttal, and for such purpose the court shall grant a continuance before' pronouncing sentence if requested by the defendant. Use of Evidence Regarding Departmental Action 40807. No record of any action taken by the department against a person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle, nor any testimony regarding the proceedings at, or concerning, or produced at, any hearing held in connection with such action, shall be admissible as evidence in any court in any criminal action. No provision of this section shall in any way limit the admissibility of such records or testimony as is necessary to enforce the provisions of this code relating to operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license or when the driving privilege is suspended or revoked, the admissibility of such records or testimony in any prosecution for failure to disclose any matter at such a hearing when required by law to do so, or the admissibility of such records and testimony when introduced solely for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a witness. Added Ch. 804, Stats. 1977. Effective January 1, 1978. Speed Trap Evidence 40808. Subdivision (d) of Section 28 of Article I of the California Constitution shall not be construed as abrogating the evidentiary provisions of this article. Added Ch. 538, Stats. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993. ,KPPEINDI)C 44D99 CITY OF TEMECULA POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all "official traffic control devices" authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods authorized in particular circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway desicn ID features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow. CRITERIA A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re:: opening previously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meetinc, all of the following criteria: a.The street must be classified as a "local street" based on the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. b.The street should be primarily residential in nature. C.Traffic vo.'itmos on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day. d.Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification. e.An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow c' modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets which may be impacted by diverted traffic. f.The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the City. All persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. h. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law. PETITION REQUIREMENTS The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City: r:\traffic\policy\stclogtire- I 1/95/nip a.The City Traffic Encineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated impacts of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. This review will include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with engineering regulations, existing traffic conditions, projected traffic conditions, the potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for the City or conflicts with future planned improvements. b.The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of the "affected area" to be petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes are altered by the street closure or traffic flow modifications, and/or properties which are si-nificantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted. C> C.The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be supported by a minimum of 75 percent of the total number of properties within the fe affected area." Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure or modifications in traffic flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Encineer that at least 85 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow modification or have signed a document indicating, non-support for the street closure or traffic flow modificatic,,i. d.At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following: 0A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the fundin- of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area" must be provided. The drawing must include changes in traffic patterns anticipated as result of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0The petition langua-e must also clearly explain the location and nature of the b proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. 0The petition languace and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by rD the City Traffic Engineer prior to circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to be clearly understood. *A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizin- such street closure or traffic flow modifications must be provided. A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this policy. .2- r:\tmfFjc\policy\stclosure- I 1/95/ajp PETITION REVIEW PROCESS The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications: a.The City Traffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is authorized by State law. Any petition not complying with these requirements will not be accepted for consideration. b.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable, these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit A-ency, the local office of California Department of Transportation and any other a-encies tn affected by the requested closure or traffic flow modification. C.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of streets may be accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow modifications or street closure has been received and verified by the City. The purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the greatest community support. CITY ACTION ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FLOW MODFFICATION REOUESTS Once a petition contains all of the required information and all of the matters described above under "Petition Review Process" have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Public/Traffic Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referral responses received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review. The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend acainst the street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to appeal the decision, the property owner shall file a written notice of appeal with the Department of Public Works. The appeal will be heard in accordance with the Appeal Process listed below. If the request is recommended for further consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after -3- r:\Lraffic@policy\sLclosure- I 1/95/ajp making any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or traffic flow modifications. When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below: a.A letter explaining the street closure or traffic flow modifications and the time and place when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property owners, within the affected area prior to its installation. b.All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying motorists of upcoming Public Hearing. C.A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be C'iven at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners in the affected area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and by a notice published in the newspaper. d.Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs C'iving notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications will also be erected at least two weeks prior to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic modifications. e.In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21 101 or 21 100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or traffic flow modification. f.A letter explaining, the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all in property owners, within the affected area. The City Council has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify, continue or deny any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any support or lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or deny a street closure or traffic flow modifications request will be by adoption of a formal resolution. r:'@traffic\policy\sLclosure- I1195/ajp DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PETITION TO CLOSE OR MODIFY THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON STREET BETWEEN AND BY THE INSTALLATION OF (Nature of Chan2es) AT (Location) DATE: BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CITY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS. We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of Temecula to on Street as shown on the attached drawing. All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order tc, Facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modification. The specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications states: All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted bv the proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map. Our designated contact person is: Phone: Signature Print Name Print Address r:\trELffic\policy\wiosure- I 1/95/ajp APPENDIX "A" RULES AND REGULATIONS: SUBJECT MATTER VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21 100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution recardina the following matters: a.Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the hiahways. 0 h.Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passen(,er vehicles for hire. C.Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers. d.Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of Section 21400. e.Regulatinc, traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such 0 duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable, at the s.-@nes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic direction for orderly traffic flow. No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local authority has submitted to the commissioneror to the chief law enforcementofficer exercisingjurisdiction in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until the commissioner or such other c@ief law enforcement officer approves the proposed prooram. The commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assi-ned to perform el the duty described in this subdivision. f.Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons authorized for such duty by the local authority. g.Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority, excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under Section 1 1505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing a-ency I icensed under Chapter I I (commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and county pursuant to Section 121 1 1. h.Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks. i.Providin- for the appointment of nonstudent school crossin- guards for the protection of persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning thereafter to a place of safety. -6- r:\Lraffic\policy\stclomure-1 1!95/ajp j.Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority. k.Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless (1) that person has been -iven the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control point and then a-ain passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by sicns that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local ordinance or resolution on cruising. 1.Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire lane, as described in Section 22500. 1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650). TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21 100. I Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400. REGULATION OF HIGHWAYS VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21101. Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters: a.Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic. b.Designatinc, any highway as a through highway and requirin- that all vehicles observe official C, :D traffic control devices before entering or crossing the hi-hway or desicnatin- any intersection el C, t) as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the intersection. C.Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 103 1) of Chapter 5 of Part I of Division I of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote. -7- r:\truff'iclf>olicy\stclosure- I 1/95/ujp d.Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conductin- C, automobile driver training programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state. e.Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing. f.Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadwa design features to implement the circulation element of a ceneral y plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division I of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local government to provide for the health and safety of its citizens. LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE HIGHWAY: CRIMINAL ACTIVITY VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21101.4(a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for Z> temporarily closing to throu-h traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions t, are, after a public hearing, found to exist. ZD 1.'ne local authority finds and determines that there is serious and continual criminal activity in the por@@on of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This findin- and determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriffs department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol. 2.The hichway has not been designated as a throu-h hichwdy or arterial street. 3.Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity. 4.The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emer-ency vehicles, the ID performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of frei-ht by commercial 4D vehicles in the area of the hi-hway proposed to be temporarily closed. (b)A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months, except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not more than 18 months. r:\Lmffic@policy@tclosure-1 1/95/ajp ,NPPE DI)C 66E'9 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Service Order Request DATE: June 16, 1993 TIME: 12:00 p.m. TO: MARTY LAUBER RECORDED BY: Dolores Villa CALLER: George Cullen PHONE: 676-1435 42741 Agena Street REQUESTINGCALL BACK:Circle One: No ADDRESS OFDIFFICULTY: intersection of Agena and Southern Cross LOCATION OFDIFFICULTY: Agena and S(,uthern Cross 3ESCRIPTION:Citizen requests a double Stop Sign - many people are speeding and not stopping!! Warning "Stop ahead" - Very dangerous intersection A.S.A.P. SERVICE COMPLETED BY: COMPLETION DATE: NOTES: pwOl\forms\admin\service.req 041993 TELEPHONE MESSAGE TO:Karel Lindemans cc:Ron Bradley Chief Lebahn Joe Kicak FROM:Tony Beradino 676-0717 DATE:March 20, 1995 SUBJ: Speeding on Southern Cross There was a terrible accident Friday night. Apparently kids were drinking and hit a fire hydrant. Both cars were totalled. Is there anything you can do to stop the high school kids from speeding on Southern Cross? It is a very dangerous situation. In addition to speeding, the kids make rolling stops at the stop sign. The Satellite Ridge Homeowners Association is going to be discussing this and may get a petition together. His suggestion is to paint STOP in white letters on the street and to ask the Police Department to patrol the area more often. Sue Steffen cc: J. Kicak Play 25, 1995 Temecula Valley Unifi-ed School District 31350 Rancho Vista Rd. Temecula, CA 92592 Dear Patricia B. Novotney, Ed D. As a parent of children attending Vail Elementary School, I am writing this letter to bring to your and the School Board's if it has not been addressed in the past, the NEED for sidewalks along Sana'-a Cecila, another major road leading to and from Vail Elementary School. I am concerned for my children's safety, as well as the other children who walk to and from school each day. Because of my concern, I walk children each day--it is one less vehicle traveling on Santa Cecila during the release of children from school. A speed limit sign is not posted along Santa Cecila, nor a sign indicating "school zone, children present." Would it be appropriate t-.o have these posted? Many, many cars line SarLta Cecila as well as Mira Loma each afternoon; cars face North, South, East and West waiting to pick children up from Vail Elementary School. At this time, children are walking home on Santa Cecila .... on front lawns to avoid the cars. I have seen children playing around, pushing one another, landing in the street in front of cars. They walk in groups, side by side walking between the parked cars--a dangerous and serious situation for ALL concerned. Children have darted into 'the street to get to the other side of Santa Cecila where the caren-@ waits. The NEED for sidewalks on Santa Cecila dose exist for the children who 1--v@- -In the '!'-a Vista He@gh-s and Starl'-gh' Ridce area. --ece@-- newspaper a--@4,c'-2 featured in the Press Enterprise on Wednesday, !,lay 24, 1995 s--a-Les: "The Temecula City Council has aodroved plans to build sidewalks along a portion of Mira Loma @r. ana Rancho Vista Rd. The sidewalks will be built along the cor@Li-on of P@,4-ra Loma Dr. WEST of Vail Elementary School and will cost about $34,600.11 Was 3anta Cec4-la mentioned i-n this approval Plan? Santa Mira Loma a:id Rancho Vista Roads are all ma,@o- i-ou-@es to and -from Va@-1- ---J'.ementarv School, used by cars arci children. SA-7ETY on SantEL Cecila needs -Lo be addressed to the croder Personnel and revie!wed by them. i, have enclosed pictures with notes on the back of each picture i'or you to see the situation on Santa Cecila, and DO STRONGLY z.uggest you and or the School Board members, traffic division %-isit Santa Cecila at 3:07 PM sometime soon. Sincerely, C'oncerned Parent Sandra J. Leonard 30214 Caprice Ct. aemecula, CA 909-699-9104 cc:City of Temecula, City Council, etal City Manager,.City of Temecula Vail Elementary School, PTA President Vail Elementary School, Patricia L. Yavno Starlight Ridge Homeowners Association Alta Vista Heights Homeowners Association MEMORANDUM TO:Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineering FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE:June 5, 1995 SUBJECT:Student Safety on Santa Cecilia Drive This memo has been prepared in response to the letter received from Sandra J. Leonard dated May 22, 1995. Her letter is attached and centers on pedestrian safety adjacent to Vail Elementary School. The first and most prominent concern raised was the need for sidewalks along Santa Cecilia Drive. The Department of Public Works has just completed our application for SB821 funding for a five (5) foot wide sidewalk along the entire length of Santa Cecilia Drive. The Traffic Division has worked with Temecula Valley Unified School District to create the suggested route to school for Vail Elementary and we identified the need for a safe pedestrian link through this neighborhood. Our application is attached for your review and to provide greater detail if needed. The second concern was for the posting of the speed limit on Santa Cecilia Drive. The policy of the Traffic Division has been to only post residential prima facie 25 MPH zones if the Police Department or a traffic engineering survey identifies a particularly high number of violations. It is also not recommended to post the installation "C" - School, Speed Limit 25 MPF4, When Children Are Present sign, because the speed limit is always 25 MPH. The public may think the speed limit is higher when there are no children present. In an effort to increase pedestrian safety, staff recommends placing a W63 - advance school symbol sign with a W65 - school plate on Santa Cecilia just west of Escolacata Drive for westbound traffic approaching the school grounds (examples attached). A school legend should be placed at the same location. The final issue discussed was the approval of plans for installing sidewalks on Mira Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road. In the 1990-1991 SB821 funding cycle the City of Temecula received funding for the construction of sidewalk on both Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive adjacent to Vail Elementary School. This sidewalk has been completed. In the 1 994- 1 995 cycle we also received funding for sidewalk on both streets which will fully encircle the school grounds. City Council has approved staff to go out to bid on this project with completion forecasted for around August 1, 1995. Based on the limited funds available through SBS21, Santa Cecilia was not included in any previous proposals. r: \Iauber\9 5\mem\kicak.a, 605/aip FY 1995-96 PROD-ECT INFORMATION (SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Only) 1.AGENCY: -City of Temcula 2. PROJECT NAME: Sidewalk Project - Santa Cecilia Drive 3. CONTACT PERSON: Mart-y Lauber, Traffic Engineer 4. PHON-T NUM13ER: (909) 694-6411 S.PROJECT BUDGET: R- TDA ARTICLE 3 (SB 821) $29,317 C=R LCCAL F=S $7,330 TOTAL $36,647 EXPENSES: CONSTRUCTION $32,647 ENGINEERING/ADMIN. $3,000 CLEARING AND GRUBBING $1,000 RIC-HT-OF-WAY $ C=R (Specify) $ TOTA-L $36,647 6. ESTIMATED STARTING DATE (MONTH/YR.): 11/95 7.- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE-(MONTH/YR.) 1/96 RCTC: 4/9,= CITY OF TEMECULA SB 821 PROJECT APPLICATION MAY 1995 PROJECT:Sidewalk Project - North Side of Santa Cecilia Drive from Mira Loma Drive to Cosmic Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project will provide pedestrians with a five-foot sidewalk and eight pedestrian ramps behind existing curb and gutter. Santa Cecilia Street is in a residential area near an elementary school. This route is on the elementary school's 'Suggested Route to School' map. Currently, neighborhood children walk in the street while traveling to and from school. Completion of this sidewalk project will enhance pedestrian safety by moving children out of the busy street. This safety enhancement will also encourage parents to allow their children to walk to school, thus decreasing automobile traffic in the area. The design of this project meets ADA requirements and does not .meander.' This project would be completed in a timely manner as minimum grading is required. PROJECT LIMITS GO ot4DA FL PO CITY OF TEMECULA DCL C'T PROPOSED SB 821 SIDEWALK PROJECT FY 1995-96 SANTA CECILIA DRIVE DATE:May 31, 1995 -@30 SIGNS Traffic Manual 11-1982 POLICY ADVANCE SCHOOL SYMBOL SIGN W63The Advance School symbol sign (W63) may be used in advance of remote school crosswalks outside of the school zone. On streets with prima facie 25 MPH speed limit that are contiguous to a school building or school grounds, it is combined with a SCHOOL plate (W65) to form an Installation A, used to inform drivers that are entering a school zone. See Chapter 10 "School Area Standard 3611Pedestrian Safety" for further information and examples of application. W64 (s3-1) SCHOOL BUS STOP FT. SIGN The SCHOOL BUS STOP FT Sign (W64) may be used to give advance notice of approved school bus stops where clear sight distance is less than 200 feet. (See CVC 22504.) Standard 30" SCHOOL PLATE The SCHOOL plate (W65) is not used alone. On streets with prima facie 25 MPH speed limit, it is combined W65 (S4-3) with W63 to form an Installation A. On streets with higher speed limits, it is combined with R2 (25) and R71 or R72 to form an Installation C, used to inform drivers they Standard 24" x 811 are entering a school zone with a 25 MPH speed limit at certain times. See Chapter 1 0, "School Area Pedestrian Safety" for further information and examples of application. W66 (S2-1) SC-HOOL CROSSING SYMBOL SIGN The School Crossing symbol sign (W66) is combined with the SCHOOL XING plate (W66A) to form an instal- lation B, which may be used at marked school crosswalks Standard 36" on the "Suggested Route to School". It shall not be used where the crossing is controlled by yield sign, stop sign or traffic signal. See Chapter 1 0, "School Area Pedestrian Safety" for further information and examples of application. W66A The W66 and W66A should usually be posted at the Standard 24" x la" crosswalk, but may be posted up to 50 feet in advance. AGENDA REPORT (ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND NOTES) TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission F'ROM:Ken Brucianan / Homeowner 42244 Cosmic Dr. Temecula, CA 92592 (909) 699-6590 DATE:June 22, 1995 SUBJECT-.item 2 Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive ADDMONAL BACKGROLTND: T'he purpose of this report is to provide additional information on the traffic problems that continue to occur in the Starlight Ridge area, or more specifically, on the Mira Loma-Santa Cecilia-Cosmic Drive 'speedway'. These neighborhood streets are beinc, used as a short-cut by two groups of drivers: 1.) Teachers, School Administrators, and Parents of Students at Vail Elementarv School (who live in anv area north of the school) as thev go to nd from the school. Vail Elementarv School is a year-around school and there are no sidewalks so this trafec is mixin- with elemenm7 school children walking in the street to and from Vail Elementarv School. 2.)Residents of the. Ar)artments, )ur)lexes, and Houses surrounding Nura Loma Dr. and Area south of Rancho Vista Drive as thev zo to and from Rancho California Rd. Amon2 this second group is a substantial number of young, aggressive males who have no regard for the children in 'the area. They Eke to chase each other through these streets and often appear to be under the influence of drucs or alcohol (see attached Pr= Enterprise article dated 6/22/94). Amon- the known incidents that have taken place in the last 3 years are as follows: 1.)Drun c driv -r smashes into 4 cars on Santa Cefilia Dr.. 12ushing one of them into homeowner's -zara@e. Homeowners have seen the man drive bv their house repeatedly since then, staring at them as he -oes by. (Earlv 1995) 2.)Do!z run ove (Summer 1994) n Cosmic Dr. between Santa Cecilia and Rancho ifornia Dr. 3.)Assault @th a deadiv weapon at intersection of Santa Cecilia and Cosmic Drive. Two drivers get into altercation, one driver attacks other with knife. (Summer 1994) (cont.) pa-c 2 z Public@TrafFic Saferv Commission 4.)Shootin!z incident occurs durin!z Rarrv on Mira Loma Dr. bv Vail Elementarv school (see attached article). Cars chase each other with additional shots fired at intersection of Rancho California Rd. and Ynez. Police raid home, find drugs, guns, ammo; male juvenile arrested on outstanding warrant. (June '7'7, 1994) ri D 'ver on Santa Cecilia hits bicyclist head-on as bicyclist is turniniz left onto Santa Cecilia from AL,ena St. Bicyclist spends two weeks in hospital. (Sprinc, 1993) 6.)Drunk driver driving down Santa Cecilia misses corner at Cosmic Dr. and smashes into rrel- at 4"@8 Cosmic Dr. (Summer 1992) 7.)Manv other near-traizedies that have gone unreported. A traffic. study was conducted approximately one year ago (see attached letter from Hasib @a dated August 17, 1994, along with speed data for 6/22/94). The city has installed '25 NPH" speed limit sips (in front of my house). There has also been selective monitoring (using a radar trailer) and occasional radar enforcement (by motorcycle police officer). However, the volume and speed of the traffic continues to be a problem for manv homeowners in Starli2ht Ridce, particularly alone, Cosn3ic Dr. and Santa Cecilia. Once @zain, these are neighborhood streets with lots of kids wafldng on the streets to and from the @ail Elementarv School. These streets arc being used, in large part, by people from outside the neighborhood, as a short-cut. Efforts to date, while beneficw, have done little to reduce the speed, or particularly , 7 the volume of traf5c on these streets. Anv efforts by Traffic Safety Commission to provide a long-term solution to this problem would be greatly appreciated. One possible lonc,-term solution might be to extend Moraga Rd. through to @a Loma Dr. Another ID miahr be to install physical barriers to prevent traffic from using this Mir' Loma-Santa Cecilia- a Cosmic Dr. short-cut. Attachments:Copy of Press Enterprise Article dated 6@4 Hasib Baha Letter dated 8/17/94 (inc. speed data for Cosmic Dr. on 6/22/94) Two arrest'ed after shots -fired at Temecula party he Bed. other peopiecliased him, TEMECULA on-o7 Two people were arrested after ads. shots were And at a party and elude one of the paz-ty-goers was then led chased through the city. No one was injured. Police offi got a search war- The incident began Monday Drive night after several people began to a fight during the p@ on the 29000 with block Of Mira Lo@ Driv . One person @ uni- police, Frank Chukes. 22. of Costa @esa allegedly ftr@a handgun, the hitting the departing person's car once in a fender. arrested on suspi- Police did not release the name on Of assault with a deadly weap- of the person who was shot aL As OIL cit mecula iness Park C)rive Ternec:ula. California 92590 (909) 694-198@ FAX 1909, August 17, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Bruckman 42244 Cosmic Drive Temecula, California 92592 Dear @. and Mrs. Bruckman: 'Ibis letter is a follow up to our letter dated July 1, 1994 and a response to your letter dated June 22, 1994. In. your letter you showed concerns about speeding motorists on Cosmic Drive near Santa Cecilia Drive, making left turns from Cosmic Drive into westbound Rancho California Road, and establishing sidewalks on Santa Cecilia Drive. As promised, I have installed two spee&volume counters to study the speed profile of vehicles travelling on Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive. These counters have -recorded speeds from June 22, 1994 to June, 27, 1994. One counter was @led about 400 feet west of Cosmic Drive on Santa Cecilia and the other counter was approximately 400 feet north of Santa Cecilia Drive on Cosmic Drive. Speeds recorded on Cosmic Drive were significantly higher. The data from both counters is attached for your review. ANALYZING DATA: Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive are residential streets. According to California Vehicle Code (22352 b.1) residential streets have a prima facie speed limit of 25mph. 'rbe data on Cosmic Drive shows an unusually high number of vehicles travelling in excess of 30 miles per hour. (See attached data) An All-Way 'Stop' sign is not warranted at this intersection based on the average daily traffic (volume). Please see the artached Caltrans Warrants for an All-Way Stop sign installation. As part of our signal priority listing we will be r-Anking the intersection of Rancho California road and Cosmic Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the obtained data and field investigations, we feel that installation of '25 M?H' speed limit signs at Cosmic Drive along with selective Police enforcement could reduce speedinc, viol ations at this intersection. In addition, The City of Temecula is currently developing a Neighborhood Traffic Awareness ProcIram to educate motorists as to their speed on public streets. We are in the process of obtainin- a radar-trailer which will inform the drivers of their velocity by displaying the exact speed when approaching the radar trailer. The posted speed limit is shown just above the vehicle speed for r. %bwmNicacr@co"nLa. ILriajp comparison. We will be glad to put your name on our radar-trailer study list if you would like to volunteer to monitor speed limit compliance. We believe the installation of a radar-trailer could help reduce the speed of the motorists on Cosmic Drive. Thank you again and if you have any questions or comments concernin- this matter, please contact me at 694-6411. Sincerely, Traffic Technician Attachment:Existing Speed Data Sheets All-Way Stop Control Policy cc:Tim D. Serlet, Dire=r of Public Works/City Engineer Sgt. Domenoe, Temecula Police Dep:irrment Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer SITE CODE : 00000000 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE: 1 STREET FILE: cosmicsc '@IM!TS COUNTZ-R t : DATE: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tlt SPEED RANGES (MPH) a= GN 0-15 16-20 21-?-5 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 56-60 61-65 7D- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 c 0 40 iR TC)TA 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:OC PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 3:30 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 c 0 0 0 40 3.-45 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 IF T---A 0 0 - 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 @:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 53 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 4-30 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 (0 0 0 0 46 4:45 7 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 38 3 6 2 3 0 0 5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 5:15 5 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4,0 ):30 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 3:45 5 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 39 HP TOT 0 0 0 2 2 4 4 1 (0 0 0 0 0 (a) 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ;& 0 0 0 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TO=-,AL 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 (a @:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 50 TOT@, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 E:CO PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 i5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 53 FP TOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 43 -,.Oo PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 58 9:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3C 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 .5 2 0 a 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 HR TOTAL 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 )o pH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 SITE CODE 00000000 CITY OF TENECLJLA PAGE: 2 STREET cosmic Drive FILE: COSMICS: LIMITS 5001 north of Santa CeciLia Dr CotiNTER 9 2 DATE: 6/22/94 ----------------------------------- ------------------------- 7@ ------------------------------------------------- TIME TOTAL SPEED RANGES (MPH) BEGIN COUNTED 0-15 16-20 21 @5 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 70- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RR TOTAL 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 HR TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 2 10 17 17 6 a 3 1 SPEED UNDULATION POLICY Prior to the construction of speed undulations, the subject street section shall meet the following criteria: 1.A "Speed Undulation Petition' signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the affected property owners shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division. 2.The average daily traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-f our (24)hour period. 3.The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State law. 4.At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five (25)mph speed limit. 5.The subject street: a.Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer. b.Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes. C.Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where undulations are to be constructed. d.Shall be at least one quarter (Y4) mile in length. e.Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features. f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route. 9-Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles. h.Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City Engineer. 6.The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet, unless approved by the City Engineer. 7.Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous street or on a relatively short (< 800') cul-de--sac. 8.Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawing. 9.Location of undulations shall be discussed with the School District and Fire Department and report back to Commission. 10.Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alterations or removal of any undulation may occur at any time. pwO@traffic@undulatn@pdund.pot Speed Undulation Policy Page 2 Changing the location of undulations on a street, or the removal of undulations, may be considered when all the findings listed below are made by the Commission: Relocation of Undulations 1 Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles. 2.Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines. 3.There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the community. 4.There is a petition signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the affected property owners in favor of relocation. Remova I of Undulations 1 . Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles. 2.Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines. 3.There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the community. 4.There is a petition signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the affected property owners in favor of removal. 5. Undulations have been installed for at least two (2) years. Removal of undulations which have been installed for less than two years will only be consi 'dered if the City is compensated by those requesting removal for the full cost of the original installation, including design, construction and inspection. The original installation and maintenance of the undulations will be financed as all other signs, striping and pavement features. pwOS\traffic@undulatn@spdund.pol STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Ralston Management 27919 Front Street, Suite 203 Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 676-9299 July 20, 1995 RECF'IVF---"-."-- JUL 2 4 1,99-; Mr. Marty Lauber City of Temecula Traffic Engineer 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Starlight Ridge Community Dear Mr. Lauber: The Board of Directors of Starlight Ridge has recently learned that sidewalks are being planned in our community (Cosmic/Santa Cecilia).As President of Starlight Ridge, I would like the opportunityto provide input during the planning stage as this affects someof our homeowners and our community in general. Please let me know if this is possible or how we can help. Sincerely, Wayne Hall, President Starlight Ridge Association WH:lr Cc-: Dov4 STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Ralston Management 27919 Front Street, Suite #203 Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 676-9299 August 2, 1995 PA @c AUG 0 7 1995 JOHN SCH@ JR. 30561 MILKY WAY DR. TEMECULA, CA 92592 Dear Mr. Schaap: Your letter of 6-29-95 has been reviewed by the Board of Directors. In view of the fact that the city of Temecula is working on the issues you raise, we are forwarding a copy of your letter to Mr. Marty Lauber City of Temecula Traffic Engineer 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Ca 92590 Sincerely Yours, Luci Ralston, for Board of Directors cc:Mr. Marty Lauber with Enclosure -C)L@ @a-s @OZD 7M -7C) @C--7 CA t- .0@ N\m CD@ 7Z (L-, MC C (S) I\A NA AGENDA REPORT TO:PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION FROM:Ken Bruckman / President STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 42244 Cosmic Dr. Temecula, CA 92592 (909) 699-6590 DATE:August 24, 1995 SUBJECT-Item 4 Starlight Ridge Traffic Study With respect to the above-mentioned Starlight Ridge Traffic Study, I am confident the homeowners in our neighborhood would welcome and fully support any Police Department plan to enforce the 25 MPH speed limit in our neighborhood, as well as the scheduling of the Radar Display Unit throughout the neighborhood, as recommended in Marty Lauber's report. However, I would like to offer a rebuttal to Marty Lauber's responses to the issues I raised in my previous memo to the commission dated 6/22/95. 1.)The main roadway in Starlight Ridge is being used as a short-cut. Marty Lauber's response that theCosmic/Santa Cecilia roadway is not being used as a short cut is nothing short of argumentative. Hisforecast of each single family residence making 10 trips per day is ridiculous. His final comment "All public streets are provided for anyone to use on whatever paths they select" is again - argumentative. I invite anyone with an interest to my home for a first-hand evaluation of the situation. 2.) Vehicle speeds are a problem. The traffic study was done during the same time the city contracted to trim the street trees in our neighborhood. Most of the time there were large trucks etc. This has undoubtedly resulted in a flawed ction in speed along Cosmic Drive (compared to last year's study) can be attributed to the fact that the speed counters were 12 @d significantly closer to the intersection with Santa Cecilia. In other words, drivers had already begun to decelerate into t e turn or had not fully accelerated out of the turn. Nevertheless, t but not nearly as much as appears to be indicated. With respect to collision history for the area (Table "B" in Marty Uuber's report), there have already been two accidents in the neighborhood during the first three months of 1995, compared to only one per year in each of the previous two years. This can be viewed either as "only" two accidents, or an 800% increase, depending on your perspective. 3.) The existing vehicle volumes are a problem. The traffic volumes may appear to be low - except when consideration is given to the fact that most of this traffic is occurring at the same time that the little children in our neighborhood a e walking to and from Vail Elementary School. As mentioned previous Y, there are no sidewalks in Starlight Ridge, and these little kids are being forced to share the streets with this traffic. 4.) Request to extend Moraga Road through to Mira Loma Dr. If this, as Marty Lauber states, "is not in our future", I would like to request that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission develop an alternative long-term plan to correct this design flaw. Ideally, such a plan should be coordinated with the school district in such a way as to alleviate the parking situation around Vail Elementary School. In the meantime, I would like to recommend that the Traffic/Safety Commission approve the installation of stop controls at the following locations: 1.Mira Loma Drive at Santa Cecilia (at the entrance to Vail Elementary School). 2.Santa Cecilia Drive at Agena (not on Agena at Santa Cecilia) 3.Santa Cecilia Drive at Cosmic. Thank you for your efforts and consideration of these matters. cc: Joe Kicak -2 December 6, 1995 REC@EIVEE) City of Temecula DEC I 1 1995 43174 Business Park Drive CITY OF TEMECULA Temecula, CA 92590 ;-:NGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTN:Mr. Marty Lauber Temecula Traffic Engineer SUBJECT:COSMIC WAY & SANTA CECILIA DRIVE STARLIGHT RIDGE RESIDENTIAL AREA DEAR SIRS: I live on Santa Cecillia Drive in the Starlight Ridge area. A while back a man came to my door all upset about the traffic flow on his street. The man was Don Maston and the street he lives on is Cosmic Way. He was so persuasive that I signed his petition which was to go to the City of Temecula to "ask" what could be done about slowing traffic on his street. I told him my street was just fine but he gave me all this "high speed" hoop-la about his. Afterwards I realized he hadn't given me enough information for me to sign such a document and the information he did give may well be erroneous. I called the city offices to have them take my name off the list but was told the City needed a letter from me requesting City of Temecula to take my name, Elaine Bailey, off that petition signed in October asking the City to do something. THIS LETTER IS MY OFFICIAL REQUEST FOR MY SIGNATURE TO BE DELETED FROM THAT OCTOBER PETITION. First of all, let me tell you what I see on Santa Cecilia Drive at the corner of Verdadero. I am a non-working mother and home most of the day except for running kids to and from school (Temecula Valley High School) and running various errands at various times of the day. During school traffic hours I specifically avoid going to town via Santa Cecilia, Mira Loma, Rancho Vista, Ynez, etc. due to the need to keep Vail Elementary School as free of extra traffic as possible during those times. Instead I go up Santa Cecilia and left on Cosmic Way to Rancho California - right past Mr. Maston's house. These are the onlv two ways I can get to most of the shopping centers in Temecula. I -AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO CLOSING SANTA CECILIA AT COSMIC WAY!!!!! I did not realize this was what Mr. Matson intended until I read it in the newspaper. Not only would I be blocked from my travels every day to the Lucky shopping center (my son works there and I also soon hope to) but from the City's viewpoint, even more important, would be the blocking of access to Vail Elementary School. At present there are only three ways to access Vail Elementary School: 1)One is RANCHO VISTA coming from Temecula Valley High area (the Southwest part of the area). 2)The second is RANCHO VISTA coming from Ynez (the eastern part of the area). 3)The third is SANTA CECILIA DRIVE from Cosmic from Rancho California (the northeastern part of the area). Imagine yourself looking down on a map at the location of Vail Elementary School. You see three possible major access routes to the school as listed above. Cut Santa Cecilia and you have two, but on only one street, Rancho Vista. SUPPOSE THERE IS AN EARTHQUAKE, OR FIRE, OR SOME SORT OF DISASTER THAT CUTS RANCHO VISTA ACCESS OFF, ONE OR BOTH WAYS. AMBULANCE, POLICE AND FIRE, NEVER MIND PARENT ACCESS TO THEIR CHILDREN, WOULD BE GREATLY RESTRICTED TO THE EMBARRASMENT OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS PERHAPS EVEN CAUSING NEEDLESS LOSS OF LIFE. The fact that one man is going around stirring up so much trouble because he bought a house on a busy street and now HE has a one-year old child and wants to clip everybody else's access to his street for his own benefit makes me ill. When- my children were young, we bought houses on cul-de-sacs even before they were born. This man wasn't smart enough to think ahead and do that for his child and now he wants everybody else to give of their freedom for his own indiscretion. America seems to be drowning in the Blame Game Era; blame everybody else for N,our own mistakes. Now I'm not saying Mr. Matson has the perfect environment on his street; although when I drive it past his house about 6 to 8 times a day (3 to 4 trips a day on average), it always seems calm and quiet to me. In fact, I find drivers along Cosmic at the top of Santa Cecilia and Cosmic are especially cautious and curteous as I am. There is no stop sign there and one is not needed as motorists on a daily basis have been cautious and considerate. You may have clocked a few high speed offenders. Teenagers live in this neighborhood. We had problems with them the summer of 1994 speeding down Verdadero afternoons and especially late at night. Sometimes it felt like they would keep coming across Santa Cecilia right up our driveway and into our garage. We didn't go around the neighborhood and say the City should block Verdadero at Santa Cecilia because .there were some reckless offenders. NO, SOLVE THE PROBLEM BY ARRESTING THE OFFENDERS AND THEN THE PROBLEM WILL GO AWAY. YOU DON'T RESTRICT EVERYBODY'S RIGHT AND NECESSITY TO FREE ACCESS BECAUSE OF A FEW OFFENDERS. By the way, our problem was eventually solved. Last summer was quiet and peaceful again; this too shall pass Mr. Matson! I specifically told Mr. Matson at the time he came around that I was opposed to closing any streets to which he replied that "they probably wouldn't do that anyway; this was just to get them to do something" such as the speed bumps we were talking about. The newspaper mentioned narrowing the street and putting medians in. I would support that on Cosmic Way if it would help keep speed down. A planted median would increase property values rather than blocked access decreasing it. Another thought, there is always going to be some drunk who speeds down somebody's street sometime; there is always going to be someone with car problems and brakes fail; there is always going to be somebody on roller blades who has never skated before and runs into a car at the bottom of the hill as happened this past year on Cosmic. My point is THERE IS A MEDIUM THAT MUST BE MAINTAINED. IF YOU DO TOO LITTLE, SOMEONE MAY GET HURT; IF YOU DO TOO MUCH, MANY MAY BE HURT; AND NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU GO OVERBOARD TO TRY TO CONTROL THINGS, THE SAD FACT IS THAT ACCIDENTS WILL HAPPEN. Should the fellow who went up Santa Cecilia Drive (my street) late at night this past year at 70 miles (drunk) and slammed into a neighbors mailbox and garage door cause me to lead a neighborhood campaign to close street access to my street? I think not. A few offenders do not control the rights of the many law abiding citizens, unless our police department reneges on its duty to succumb such offenders, and unless we as a society are ready to submit to a totalitarian form of government. I think not. Please take my opinion and suggestions seriously. If a decision is contemplated to close off Santa Cecilia Drive at Cosmic Way, I do believe the City of Temecula would be mired in the mud of a major civil war between the residents of Starlight Ridge. RESPECTFULLY, ELAINE BAIICV 30095 SANTA CECILI. TEMECULA, CA 92592 (909) 695-9387 STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Ralston Management 27919 Front Street, Suite 203 Temecula 'CA 92590 (909) 676-9299 February 9, 1996 RECEI'VELr-.', FEB 2 0 1996 Mr. Marty Lauber CITY OF -rLzMECULA Traffic Engineer @-NGINEERIN@ DEPARTVEN- City Of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Traffic Problems in Starlight Ridge Dear Mr. Lauber: Per your request, I am hereby notifying you in writing that the Starlight Ridge Homeowners I Association would like the City of Temecula to mi-Ligate the traf f ic Eroblems in our neighborhood. We have been requesting action from the city staff, the Trattic Satety Commission, and the City Council f or a long time. Our past president, Wayne Hall, began requesting action approximately three years ago, after picking up a child that had been hit by a car on the way to Vail Elementary School. Since then, there have been several more accidents and near tragedies, particularly along Cosmic and Santa Cecilia Drives. As we have pointed out on numerous occasions, there are no sidewalks in our neighborhood. This creates a very dangerous situation of children walking in the neighborhood streets to and from Vail Elementary School, with cars going up and down the hills and around curves at excessive rates of speed. Much of this traffic is coming from outside of our neighborhood, caused by the poor traffic patterns in the surrounding areas. Two examples of poor traffic design can be found in the way the main entrance of Vail Elementary School faces a residential street (Santa Cecilia Drive) instead of facing Rancho Vista Road and the way Moraga Road stops at Rancho California Rd., instead of extending into Mira Loma Dr., where there are two large apartment complexes. Further exacerbating the situation are several large apartment complexes along the south side of Rancho California between Ynez @oad and Moraga Road. The children in these complexes must be transported through our neighborhood to Vail Elementary School, due to the lack of a connector street between Rancho California Road and the school. Cosmic and Santa Cecilia Drives have become, in effect, an extension of Moraga Rd. We would like to have the City of Temecula develop a comprehensive plan to mitigate the dangerous situation that these poor traffic patterns cause in our neighborhood. The city currently has received funding to build a sidewalk along Santa Cecilia Drive from Vail Elementary School to Cosmic Drive. This is a good start, but represents a partial solution. Per your "Traffic Engineer's Report" to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission dated June 22, 1995, the intersection of Rancho California at Cosmic was ranked Al on the "Traffic Sianal Priority List". This also represents a partial solution. What is really needed is the implementation of some of the "traffic calming" techniques recently adopted by the City Council. More specifically we would like to see curb modifications (i.e., traffic circles, chokers, and entry statements) along Santa Cecilia and Cosmic Dr., along with Stop signs (where appropriate). Ideally, such modifications should be designed in such a way as to miminize the loss of parking in front of the affected homes. We would like to see these traffic calming techniques integrated into a comprehensive solution, in conjunction with the already funded sidewalk along Santa Cecilia and the proposed traffic signal at Cosmic Dr. and Rancho California Rd. Perhaps most important of all, we would like to see the city staff, the Traffic/Public Safety Commission, and the City Council to put an end to the bureaucratic obstacles they have created and instead work with us in developing a permanent 2olution to our problem before another child is hurt or killed i;,@ our neighborhood. Sitcereay,11 Kn B President Starlight Ridqe Homeowners' Association cc:Ron Bradley, City Manager Joe Kicak, Director of Public Works Karl Lindemanns, Mayor Jeff Stone, City Council Pat Birdsall, City Council Ron Roberts, City Council Steven Ford, City Council Ron Perry, Public/ Traffic Safety Commission Steve Sander, it Knox Johnson, If Ron Guerrero, Charles Coe, Pat Yavno, Principal/Vail Elementary School Forrest Thomas, Director of Transportation & Safety Scott Harvey, Project engineer ITEI\4 27 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE FINANCE DIREI CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project, Project No. PW94-10 Acquisition of Real Property PREPARED BY: J. Robert Flandrick, Burke, Williams & Sorensen Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends the City Council: 1 .Conduct a hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public comments and close the hearing; and 2.Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain proceeding so as to acquire the Property. RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT) Note:This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council; and 3.Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; and 4.Approve a warrant in the amount of $10,460.00, payable to the Clerk of the Superior Court for the deposit required to be made with Court. 5. Authorize the City Manage to execute all necessary documents. r. \agdrpt\96\04 23\walcott. rasr/aip BACKGROUND: That in order to proceed with the Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project ('Project") it is necessary for the City to acquire four (4) parcels of real property. Compliance with CEQA has been accomplished with regard to the Project. The rights of way required to be obtained consist of four (4) parcels of property, are described on Exhibit 'A', attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"). The purpose of the acquisition is for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto. The Property is owned by Robert J. Drolet and the RJD-1 Trust, created by a document dated April 21, 1992. The Property consists approximately 0.532 acres or 22,781 square feet. The use of Property currently is for a site of a mobile home. Prior to bidding the Walcott Corridor project, staff met with the owner's representative and prepared an easement document which was reviewed by the City Attorney and acceptable to the property owner. Subsequently, the property owner changed his mind and would not grant the easement. Submitted with this staff report is a copy of the offer the City made to the property owner which offer is required to be made pursuant to applicable law. In addition, submitted herewith are copies of the Notice of Hearing which was given to the property owner by First Class Mail, in accordance with the applicable statutes. It is necessary at this point for the City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity which would authorize the filing of condemnation proceedings to acquire the Property. Notice of this hearing was timely given in the manner prescribed by law. An independent appraisal was obtained for the Property. Enclosed are: A.A brief summary of the appraisal reflecting the values which were utilized by the City in making the required offer to the property owner; and B. A map depicting the location of the Property. After conducting the public hearing, if the City Council finds that the public necessity so requires it, the City Council should adopt the resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings for the purpose of acquiring the Property. The findings which need to be made are as set forth in a draft of a Resolution of Necessity which is transmitted herewith. Questions relating to value are not relevant to this proceeding. However, that does not mean that negotiations for the acquisition of the Property are at an end. If the Council adopts the Resolution of Necessity after the hearing, the staff will contact the property owner and attempt to reach agreement on the value to be paid for the Property. However, in order to meet time constraints, the City Attorney should be instructed to file the necessary condemnation action. r. \agdrpt\96\04 2 3\walcott. rear/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Development Impact Fees for the acquisition of the four (4)parcels required to construct the street improvements for the Walcott Corridor Project. Attachment: 1 Resolution 96- r\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.rear/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTIONOF TBE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OFFINDINGANDDE GTHATTHE PU BLICT, CONVENHNCE AND NECESSITY REQUM THE ACQIMMON OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (SO T CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET R"RO PROJECI) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Temecula (hereafter "City') hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: a. The public interest, convenience and necessity require the acquisition by said City of certain interests ("Interests') in and to certain real property ("Property") located in the City, the County of Riverside, State of California for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, located adjacent to the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol, which is a part of the Walcott Corridor Street Corridor Improvement Project ("Project"). b. The Project is planned or located in a manner that win be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; and C. The @g of the Interests as above described is necessary for the stated Project and such taking is authorized by Section 19, Article I of the California Constitution. --@,@tion 37350 gi =., and Section 40401 !a =., of the California Government Code, Section 1230. 0 10 et IN, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and other applicable law; and d. The offer to purchase required by California Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to each owner of the Interests proposed to be acquired by the City. Section 2: The City Council of the City hereby declares that it is its intention to acquire said Interests in its name in accordance with the provision of the laws of the State of California with reference to condemnation procedures, for public street purposes, and all uses appurtenant thereto. Section 3: That if any of the Interests have been appropriated to some public use, the public uses to which they are to be applied by the City, as described above, are more necessary and paramount public uses. Section 4: Said Interests hereinabove referred to, the acquisition of which is required by said public interest, convince and necessity for the purposes set forth in Section 1. Hereof, is located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and are more particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, as set forth in full. A map showing the general location of the Interests sought to be acquired in this proceeding is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference and made a @ hereof. r\agdrpt\96\0,4 23\walcott. reor/ajp Section 5: The City Attorney and the fm of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, as counsel, under the direction of the City Attorney, are authorized and directed to prepare, institute and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in the proper Court having jurisdiction thereof as may be n for the acquisition of said Property described in Section 4. Section 6: The City Clerk shall ce@ the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7: This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOF=, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby ce@ that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS: NOES: - COUNCIL ERS: ABSENT: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS: r:NagdrptN96\0423\walcott.rear/alp of Temecula 3174 Business Park Drive - Temecula, California 92590 @909) 694-1989 FAX (909) 6@-t-i999 April 3, 1996 Robert J. Drolet 1645 La Vista Del Oceano Santa Barbara, California 93109 Subject:OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY Project:Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project Owners: Robert J. Drolet/RJD-1 Trust Property Location:Property located in Temecula, California at the Southwest comer of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol APN No.: 957-150-004 Description of Interests To Be Acquired: Attached as Exhibits "A" and "B" incorporated herein by this reference, are the legal descriptions of Parcels 1 through 4, inclusive, proposed for acquisition and a map showing their location. The City of Temecula hereby offers to purchase Parcels 1 through 4, inclusive, includina all improvements located thereon referenced above for the appraised market value of $10,640.00. An independent appraisal of value was made of the Interests to be acquired. The amou,-.i -e above offer is the amount the City has determined to be the fair market value of these Interests. basis for that determination is explained in the attached Appraisal Summary and incorporated herein by this reference. If vou have any questions regarding this letter, the acquisition of the Appraisal Summary, please contact Don Spa L-nolo, Principal Engineer, at (909) 694-641 1. It is the Citv's hope that this price will be agreeable to you and that the acquisition can begin immediately. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Joseph Kicak Director of Public Works/City Engineer @P,,@T,c o, qec,C,Ecl @iDe, R- \cip\projxL&'@pw94\p-94- I O\d rolel llrisip Robert J. Drolet April 3, 1996 Page 2 I[We acknowledge receipt of the offer as presented including Exhibits "A" and "B". Date R: \cip\projecLs@pw94\pw,@ I O\drolct- ILr/njp APPRATSAT,,';ITMMARY Project:Acquisition of Right-of-Way - Southwest comer of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol (Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project) City of Temecula Location: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-150-004 (Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4) Date of Valuation: February 9, 1996 Owner:Robert J. Drolet Property Description: See Exhibit "A" Zoning:Very Low Density Residential Present Use: Site of a Mobile Home; two out Buildings @ahest and Best Use: Very Low Density - Residential Total Property Area: 2.94 acres; @g consists of .532 acres or 22,781 square feet Public Use:Public Street purposes, and all uses appurtenant thereto. Summary of Just Compensation: The market value of the property being acquired is based upon a market value appraisal prepared in accordance with accepted appraisal procedures. The valuation of your property has been based upon an analysis of recent sales of similar properties in the immediate area. 'fhe appraiser has given full and careful consideration to the highest and best use for development of the property and to all features inherent in your property affecting its market value. Total Value: $10,460.00 @s summary of the basis of the amount offered as just compensation is presented in compliance with applicable laws and has been derived from a formal appraisal prepared by an independent fee appraiser. R--'@cip\projects,p-9.4\p- -@ IO\drolet- IL,/.jp T LiN, Xi7LLI,4M FROS-@ @nez Road. Sui-L= 'loci Temecula. California FXI-'TQIT "A" DESCRT(D77(l.@j D 14. p PARCEL 1 (Fee Title) i-@a- -er-an :)arcel o@ land si-Lua-led in -=mecula, 3 L,, the C-7y 8 c r teing BE" as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 37 Paces 3@, -8 L c@,, 'o I 's a 10 'n-i a OT land 40.00 fee-L in wd@Lh, the centerline of whi-_,i- Iq descrlb=-@- ;-zs ovvs COMMENCING a-L a Po i n-L, in the cent@.rljne of Calle r ;., s o I d'!S-Lan'L '-,her.-or 375.33from the centering of Nicolas Road as shown on k- Parcel, ma,,D , said point beinc the beginn-ng o- a angenz curve oncavn southwesterly and having a radius @f 300.00 feet: '-n-@nce alone said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet -hrough a central anc-,;n 0 -c 'he northeasterly line o@ said Par-el 4 and -he TRUE POINT OF LI L L Br'GINNING-. continuing along said curve northwester-!,,v 139.8-/ @ee-- 'L,ll,rouch a @C C --u rve N c r 7 ' :7) 7- u@ A;-= E @ine of saic Parcel and the POINT OF TERMINATIO@. as 70 s n o r 3 s n- r I v one of Parcel 4 and northerly s -Lerm-,na--e in s:lzic 'ne -Ilz Par.-@-'i 4. -,ON-,Ai-NING: -'-2 or- ';@-s-@ '!E@T TO a X H IBT-1 B bV @l,, S r= ,nd z-,rence a c, -2a-- ;Lawrence @a -:)n E,-T@,l. 'T! 1 T 'Y.. ',@CST @-5-5 ',In,-7 Road. Sul-@ L:-'XH T B T-7 :-@ll DISC'1'7T(-)@,l L PARCEL 2 (Fee Title) 7- 7 - -- I , - '. L- - Cz s@@L;a-r-d in -he -er Ca I 1 f or-r)@l a . be! nc t@a@ [)C)rt- on Dar-@-'l L 7 as -7rowr on a mao tn=-!--to@ in BooK 37, -aq-es 'j7 and 38 oi-- Parce' mars n @Lh e 0 1 iz i c) he C o u r-Ly P c-c o rde r o f s a 1 d P\ 1 v e r s 1 C o u -t- -v n c i Lj,@- e r-, n strip c@ anc no.00 f ee-r in w-,,lth. the souineriy line of wh-,-n @rd -?O.00 feet northerly zrom the following @@ine: COMMENCING a -L a poirt in the cen@Lerline of C;-zlle d@s--ar@- --hereon Souzn 24001'40" East 375.33 feet from the ceni@erline of@ Nicolas Road as shown on said ' Darcel map, said point being the beginning of a tan-aen-@ curve concave southwesterly and having a radius oi@ 300.00 feet,- @L,@ence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet 'hrouqh a central angle ol@ L 27 '36" to the northeas-erlv line of said Parce', and TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, 7-cr@-"@uing along said curve northwesterly ',,Irou-ch anc e thence '.ancent from- said curve North 77".--7'02" West 132.!'.Q -he an--4 --,,e POINT OF TERMINATION. shall L-)e -1--ng-Lhe@ed cr so as -3 -er,77nat@ 7 s a n @ea s v 'i n4i c,@ 7a 4 a nd @o,, i_n@- -1 So as 7C) 7@r,,-[,ina-- v line D@ P;-z r- '-ON@ATNINC-: C-7-2@- SUBJE,--T TO -vi@v an,7 --XHT27- "B" D,,, -hS L -e i@-2r,-2nce mace a Da r7 r--2r7 -awrenc@- a,--or. B7!,Nl. l@4- ' 'AM FDOST 61\ID 27'--3:-) @'n=7 Road. Suite l@ornia T iT L -Z'- -77, -,AR,C7-i OF iD,@'RCcL'L @lr@P \@o. P@,PCEL 3 (Fee Til-.1e) 'n '7 -V 'z n -,7 8S snown on map the!-eot n B o o Dages ,- e o-c the County RecorLier of said Riverside County' nclite@- w- r a s-@rip o@ 'anc: 5.00 feet in width, the northerly line c-ic which is parallel '-,,v 'I .n@- 20.00 -lc=-e-- southerly from 'the 1--o'llowing cc-sci-ibE?c iine@ COMMENCING ;- -- a po@n-L in the cen-L-=rllne ol-' CAI'lle G'Irasol s t-I a n =-on South 2,@"01'40" East 375.33 feet from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown o,i said Parcel map, said point beina the beginning of a -Langen-L, curve concave s-@u--.nwes@.nr7y and having a radius 300.00 @ee@ oi '-@ence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet. through a central anqle of -he northeasterly "line of said Parcel and TRUE POFNT OF @@-TNNIN" -i@@,,nc along said -Lirv@ n-r@hwes- L) L Ler'l y 39. @nrc)ugh an @.7 c,!@ -_,,,,,:,nce @-;-;nQent- -:c-cm said curve Nor,-Lh 770:7)2'0-2" '4es-- 'i-32./'-c l@n- n- -L @-o --he -ON. ,@--,n,vves-=riv iire c- said Parc--l and the POINT OF TERMINATF. n e r-l' -- - - - r- I I - c n d s b e 1 e n c@ -@ 7, n- q;-z @- o r s h o r as-= S,- as -errr@,jra-@ o@ -1 and nor--Lher'!V S3 ES L c Pa - I C: @_7 SU TO ---@ve@an-Ls. -c I @@a v -nr4 -- 7 --v'-iT2-T "B" no @,v -.,7-@s mai A, L a!- C,- 3527 Ld 30 - T I L- AM FROS-ir D Yne7 Road. Suit= L 7-X@'7@,T7 "A" -77,@NI P,,' , A D P/, IRC@@i- MAP @ic. Fee T@. 'cl ;-a) 7.a r-@ - c n L C 'arce-I o@ Pa-c-I Map No. - v@-rs-ij@-. @---Le o@ 'a iii@crnia, being -Lna@L portion o@@ 7 Q@81/-.as snown on a map :nereof filed in Book 3 , Paces 37 and 38-c@ Parcel Maps -.n the Llil@i@ice of the County Recorder of said Riversice Coun-v. iyinq northerly L, ]-;in@- Darallel w-;It-l@. and 50.00 feet nor',-her@v @rom -,ie 'ol'@ow-no -escribe@ L Li 7 COMMENCING a@ a point in the centerline of Calle C-irasol distant thereon South 24'0'1-'I'O" East 377.33 fee-,-- from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown on r@l-cj-ce,@ Mac. said Do-In. being the beginning n, i@ a @Langen-. curve concave a@c:riav,,nc a raci-lus of 300.00 7 alone said curve northwesterly 142.03 -,Fee' - @rouch a c=-n--,-a' AnQ]e C)' 3 r, i-,n@- r,T Sa',;-' TR LI POINT OF Bl--,-@INNING-. -C @ch a -enra-i -n@nce -or-i-ulng alon- ----d -urve northwesterly L ---nc=n- -rom @-,,-ve North zo -1h@- 7RMT -,7 POINT O@ NATT3N. -]N7A!N'-NG: s rl,, o r-;-a ol i@ss. 7_ i c v a r) - L.S. 3527 30 - 9 C,4ZZZ' SIA7AS01 7,4A3Z,E a@ f,04YR@5 EXHIBIT 'B' _SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET / OF I" SHEET NICOLAS ROAD FEE TITLE @bcrT'BcyiL.William cfr-ost 6&@ssociatcs PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SURVEYORS S---'E 2Y, - TF--@CUL@ PARCEL 4 OF P.M. NO. 8847 LD 80 JOE? NC 7- A4 / 7,f INOTICE OF @NOTICE OF HEARING NG REGARDING = INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, A GENERAL LAW CIT-x', TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO:Robert J. Drolet YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et. seq., that the City Council of the City of Temecula intends to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Ne-@,-ssirv for acquisition by eminent domain of certain real property, for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, desio-mted as Parcels I throueh 4, inclusive, as described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ('The Property"). The acquisition of The Property is required in order to proceed vath the Walcott Corridor Street Project ('Project"). That Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference is a map depicting The Property. The hearing will be held on April 23, 1996 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City Council can hear said matter, at the Council Chambers, at the Community Recreation Center located at ' )0875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California 92592. You as a person c or having an interest in and to the Property and are hereby notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered at that hearing. The issues which will be considered, are as follows: I .Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project; Whether or not the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3 .Whether or not the Property souzht to be acquired is necessary for the Pro ect; and 4.Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner or owners of record. If you @-i to be heard at this hearing, you NFUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST, indicating vour intent to ap@ @ be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this notice by @g or @-e-. - --,-insz ti-lat w@nen request to the City Clerk, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590; telephone (909) 694-6444. You may use the -enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and desire to be heard. n@ failure tn timely file a IQ aW= and be heard may result in a waiver of ynur ri ht tn b For further information, contact the City Clerk's Office at City Hall at (909) 694-6444. @ity @,t@-PL NOTICE OF HEARING, Page 2 REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY. Name Telephone Address Dam Signature R- pwQ4\p-9-1- 10\drolcLhmalp -(n;-L -7 Roac. Z: --7 T 4 P, T 1 L.'ha L- 7 rg a D r-- 0 I -s 9 ;, n Book 37, z-nt '@e@:)r-er O@ Sa, t c) l@ land 00 i eL in wid@Ln, the cen-@erline 1 whicri 's C)WS COMMENCING a a Poinz n the c--nterl 1, ne of raso i i, -1 nzr=or cc' - S@,@,vr 07- 0 3 /7 5 . 3 J' fee- --roM -he cen-@er'i4i ne i@j sa-C pon-L being the beginning CT a -LanQe@jT: --.rve ccric@-,va- sc,@-,@wes-@--rly and having a radius of 300.00 feet:' -urve nor-hwes@er'y 142. 03 -hr-,u,@, a --nci@ onc ---a7 L T --o -.he northeasterly line CT saic: Par--=-'! 4 ant -L.- =-TRUE POi@Nlr Or' BEGINNING.- -nuinc A. ion- carve norz@wes+,=-rly r 0 u -Ur,,i@ \Ior-h 3@ sa7@ -,;zrcel i an- th@ POINT OF TEDMINATION. nr sharers-' v @C- 37 @-arc@- and nor-,ner- i v sc @X,H 3 TT "S" ;;wrenc@ 7orn,--- 7,, e 7 - - - - - - - PAPC:-7L 2 (,zee Ti-Ile) na L 07 Zl e r S - ,n zra- County Recorder olz said P,, -,/e un-v. n e,-, n )v-, /v r,, -i - L @i :,he soulrier, 'n@- P,-; @;-z anc I:-@e-@ nor-LI ierly -1c,- o m the following desc - 71 ;=,7 ne@ COMMENCING a@ ;z Doi-@L in the --enter,,Ine oz Sol -@s-an- -,@erecn C) Soul,, c s 3 e e r, c) m 'L h e n t 7@ - --, .@:) a z-s z-,-cwri Said Darce-I maD, said point being the beginning a -angen,- ,urve -@ncave S"Du@-hwes--=-r@y and havina a radius of 300.00 feel@. -,,-Ienc=- along said curve northwesterly 14'.03 fee- --rouqh a central anQ'= c-- LI - @i @ C, L@ -rce,, and the TRUE POINT OF 27'07'3"' -- -he nor-,@easterlv line c-- said P;z B-'TNNING: erc.z cor-,,nuing @-7onc sa,,-@ r-,.,rve northwestern-,,/ A-nc@@- ci 26@12'46"- -,hencr-- zancen-. @-aiu curve North /77"02',@ll"' 'Aes- -@7RM7 -- e ;-z r 1 @nc POTN-@ DF NA--'N, -er7, o-: --anc s,-,a @e -ienc,-,.@eried or _S:Z@7 7 s r -L@ie@ ne c@ DA-C=,l anc iine 71 -VH757- z 7 T 7 7 -'4RCEL 3 (Fee 7,Z@e) C. @-,@,own on 7,,,z Book -,,@e Counzv Recor--@-@r o@ said R,,ver-,-- n c-@ t'Llhe nor,.ner i @/ "I , r,.E -s @,n,.- 2n..OC l@eel-. sou-@,@er-l\/ icrom the -@'ollowing descr4lbe@, ]In=. COMMENCING a L @@n7@r 17ne e s Sou-L.- 2,"001-','O" 375.1.3 !z=-e-L, I=rcm the cz-n-Ler7lin.- o lc N-;c-u:as z-s sho@vn on L Sal" I)a'c=' mal), poin7, being the beginning oT a zar,,gan- r -"@e -onc@\,'e anc: radius c@ 300.00 feet-. -nce ong sa i d curve nor-L,@wes @Ler-'@v 1112.03 l@ee-. a -.en-L, r;.4 I an g 7 1 0 /'3c"' '-o the northeasterly line of said Parcel 4 and -L@,e TRUE POINT OF 7 P@E- L NNING, -nc"@ c@ --a,,7cer-L I-- cm s a icurve N@orth 77"2'C2" Wes- l@? L s -- n-riv n@- c,- s;zi Dar-,-n-I 'I the POINT OF TERMINATION an -D c@ land s,@7 or s: z-s ;-z s -Le@ v iqe cl@ an,--, v 07 -';z 7 llq 11 7 ::17 S T 7 Z' '152 6 - 30 7,1@l -RCS- il.11@ ".=7 =,7, C'@ D7 7 7- ROAD A RCL-" PARI@EL I (Fee @--;-LI e @,@C CZ 7 7ja- -C, 1 17 71@ P\ s e 0 7ornia, Delng -Lna7- porr'or, o@ D--r-=7 39/17 7 as shown or a mac -.,el-eci@ -ic i le@, in Book n@ Ma L, o@ saic Z@ @,17 7 1, c I par@.1 lel with and 5u'.00 lc_=et ncr-Lher 1 @,i -:7-cm nc c, e s -1@ne: COMMENCING at a po@int in the conterline ci@ r@alle Gilraso-@ @@is-Lan-L thereon South 24001'40" @- a s -LI 37:').33 feet from the centerline ol@ N'ico-ias Road as shown on said Dar,r-,-] maD, said c)olnt beinc the beginning OT a 'L---nc:.en-L curve concpve sol.,@L@,wes'--eriy and having a radius ol@ 300.00 thence alone said curve ncrthwes'-erlv 142.03 feet @Uh,-ouch a central anal@e O'@c POT -,7e nor-t@.@@s-= -ad ;z r-=' ;z r,. T R U NT OF L-rly BE"@INNTNG- 1-nence conl',-@nuina along said curve ncr-LhwesL@er'!y a cz-n-LI-al aric e c@ '-@encn- -Lancen-. 'icrom sa curve Nor:.@ POIN-1@ OF -TON TNTNG: CONTA.L A--7es, -,for-= or less. 17 '7 I Ca MZ f,4ZZZ- 671RA SOL 3 75. 3.3' r,43ZZ- COlllfSES @2zZ7'a7'.36" R-r3oO.@O." Z-=142.@' @Z@@'42'46" AP--300.,Oe' EXHIBIT 'E3' _SKETCH SHEET / OF- /.- SHEET TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION NICOLAS ROAD FEE TITLE 'kobcr-t @cijZ,William 'Fr-ost 6Z@ssoc PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYC). 297SS SINGLE O.- DP"q - SUITE?50 - TE.ECLK., C. PARCEL 4 OF P.M. NO. 8847 -& 'p@V/S@.9 Z-210--9(0 SCII@E E'-D BOOK ice NO ITEN4 28 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fl CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director@ DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Project Services, Inc. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding concerning Specific Plan No. 1 99, McMillin Project Services, Inc. for authorizing the payment of development fees at a specified level and directing the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ANALYSIS The attached MOU authorizes McMillin Project Services, Inc. to obtain building permits and occupancy permits for homes in their development without payment of the Public Facilities Fees until such time as the first production home obtains its Certificate of Occupancy. This provision is consistent with previous approvals granted to similar projects in the City such as Costain Homes, Van Daele Development Corporation and Taylor Woodrow Homes California LTD. The City will be negotiating a new Development Agreement between the City and McMillin Project Services, Inc. for this project. Approval of this MOU will not mandate that the City Council approve the draft Development Agreement. In the event that the City Council denies the draft Development Agreement, the Memorandum of Understanding provides that McMillin Project Services, Inc. will then pay the Public Facilities Fees as provided in the existing Development Agreement No. 5. The major differences between this proposed development agreement and others that have been approved by the City are: 0The basic fee is revised from $3,000.00 per unit to $3,970.00 per unit (amount proposed DMG Development Impact Fee Study). 0An additional ten percent ($397.00) of the basic fee is proposed to be added in consideration of the five years of additional entitlements guaranteed under the Development Agreement, thus bringing the total up to $4,367.00 per unit. R:\STAFFRn\MCMa,LEN.MOU 4/15/96 mf 1 0McMillin will dedicate a fully improved 8.29 acre park to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for the 608th unit. The City will apply a credit of 2.5 acres for the existing Veteran's Park and a 50% credit for the golf course towards the Quimby requirement, and a 25% fee credit towards the Parks and Recreation component of the Public Facilities Fee for improvements to the golf course. The actual cost of improving the 8.29 acre park will be credited towards the Parks and Recreation component of the Public Facilities Fee. One area of disagreement between staff and the applicant in the proposed agreement relates to credits for public facilities. The applicant is requesting a credit of $315/unit, (see column 3 of Exhibit A ), for financial contributions made for improvements to Rancho California Road/1- 1 5 overcrossing and ramps. This issue is also discussed in Section 1 1, page 4 of the agreement. It is staff's position that no credit should be given for these improvements; however, the applicant is requesting Council consideration of this matter and will present an argument at the hearing to support this position. The actual adjusted fee after all credits have been deducted, (excluding the disputed $315.00 credit), is $3,924.50. Because the language relating to the public facilities credit is still contained in the agreement, staff will modify the documents to reflect Council direction on this issue after Council action. The Planning Commission and City Council will be presented in the near future with the draft Development Agreement. The terms of the draft Development Agreement will be subject to extensive negotiations between the City and the developer. FISCAL IMPACT: Interim Public Facilities Fee to be Collected at Project Buildout: 1,666 Dwelling Units X $3,924.50 = $6,538,217.00 Attachments: 1 . Exhibit (Vicinity Map) - Page 3 2.Memorandum of Understanding - Page 4 R:\STAFFRP'nM MOU 4/16/% mf ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT (VICINITY MAP) R:\STAFFRn\MCMILLEN.MOU 4115/96 mf 3 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, MCMILLIN PROJECT SERVICES, INC. ATTACHMENT - 1 VICINITY MAP CilYCOUNCILDATE-APRIL23,1996 R:\STAFFRPT\MC@LEN.MOU 4/15/96 mf ATTACHMENT NO. 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING I R:\STAFF@\MC@LEN.MOU 4115/96 mf 4 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (Temeku Country Club) Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ("City') and McMillin Project Services, Inc., a California Corporation ('McMillin') to be effective on April 23, 1996, with reference to the following: RECIIALS A. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, ct =. ("Development Agreement Statutes") McMiUin's predecessor-in-interest, Margarita Village Development Company (Bme-Rancho California and Nevada-Rancho California) and other landowners, entered into a development agreement ("Development Agreement No. 5') with the County of Riverside ("County"), recorded November 7, 1988 as Instrument No. 325515 of the Official Records of Riverside County, California. B. Development Agreement No. 5 encompassed a 1,399 acre project formerly located within the County known as Margarita Viflage-Specific Plan No. 199. C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City succeeded to the interest of the County under Development Agreement No. 5 upon incorporation of the City in 1989 and the inclusion of the Margarita Village-Specific Plan No. 199 territory within the municipal boundaries of the new City. D. McMillin has entered into a contract to purchase title to a 472 acre portion of Specific Plan No. 199, Village A, known as Temeku Country Club ('Temeku"). Temeku was planned to be developed as a self-contained retirement community. E. City and McMillin acknowledge that development of Temeku as a family oriented, as opposed to a retirement, community will result in the generation of significant municipal revenue and creation of diversified housing opportunities associated with a quality residential project. F. The City and McMillin further acknowledge that the Temeku subdivision cannot be developed to be a viable project unless Development Agreement No. 5 is amended and restated to provide for, among other things: 04-15-% 10026-00002 S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3 1. The on of the County Public Facilities and Services Nfitigation Fee ("County Public Facilities Fee") to be replaced with a City Public Facilities Fee; 2. Revisions to the Temeku entitlements to eliminate residential retirement oriented housing; 3. Provide for maintaining landscaping adjacent to perimeter and collector streets by the Temecula Community Service District; 4. Provide for satisfying City Ordinance No. 460.93 relating to park recreation fees and dedications ("Quimby Requirement"). G. in acquiring Temeku, as the successor in interest to Margarita Village Development Company, McMillin will become one of the developer parties to the Rancho California Road Improvement Agreement dated November 12, 1991 and recorded as Instrument No. 429566 in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder (the "Improvement Agreement'). The Improvement Agreement provides, among other things, for construction by the City of certain improvements to the I-15/Rancho California Road off-ramps and the widening of portions of Rancho California Road. It is acknowledged @ Mc@'s obligation and share of the construction costs under the Improvement Agreement is $524,360. H. It is @er acknowledged between the City and McMillin that development of the Temeku project is a complex process during which each of the parties will invest substantial time, effort and monetary consideration. This MOU is intended to serve as a guideline for more detailed and binding documentation necessary to ultimately implement the understandings of the parties and to insure that the parties are aware of the significant commitments that each is undertaking to accomplish the objectives set forth in this MOU. By these recitals, the parties therefore wish to express their mutual understandings, responsibilities, and intentions prior to the entering into a restatement and amendment of Development Agreement No. 5. City and McMillin agree to cooperate and use their best efforts to quickly and completely implement the terms of this mou. A.GREEMENIS 1. S@fic Plan Amendment and Zone ChanLe oanninl, Area-s 38 an@. McMillin shall apply for and City shall process an amendment to Specific Plan No. 199, Village A, to enable McMillin to reduce and/or eliminate entirely the obligation to construct senior residential housing. Mcshall also apply for and City shall process a Change of Zone to bring the zoning for PlanningAreas 38 and 40 into conformance with the Medium High designation to be consistent with otherresidential areas of Village A. City shall use its best efforts to process this 04-15-96 10026-00002 2 S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3 S Plan Amendment and Change of Zone to be co by the City P@g Commission and the City Council on or before April 23, 1996. 2. Com@ensive Amendment to S@c Plan No. 199, VillaLe A. Soon after close of escrow for the purchase of Temeku, Mc@ shall apply for and City agrees to process a more comprehensive amendment to Specific Plan No. 199, Village A to provide, among other things, for the conversion of the private roadways to be dedicated as a part of the City's public street system. The comprehensive Speafic Plan amendment will also provide for a range of residential product types and densities including custom home lots. 3. Quimby RcQuiremeM. It is agreed and understood that Mc shall satisfy its obligations to dedicate park land or pay m lieu park fees under City Ordinance No. 460.93 as follows: (a) Mc@ @ dedicate to the City a fully unproved park to be used for recreational purposes in accordance with the City's Quimby Requirement (see Example below) prior to the issuance of the 608th building permit for residential dwelling units in Temeku. (b) City shall provide a 50% credit towards the Temeku Quimby Requirement because of the golf course; (c) City shall provide a 2.5 acre credit for Veterans Park. Example of CalculatinLy the Temeku Quimby Rcquiremenl: Assuming 1,666 DU's x 2.59 persons per DU = 4,315 4,315 1,000 = 4.31 5 acres for every 1,000 people 5 x 4.31 = 21.57 acres 21.57- 50% golf course credit = 10.79 acres 10.79- 2.5 acres Veterans Park = 8.29 acres Using this exwnple, McMillin would be obligated to dedicate an 8.29 acre park to the City. (d)Upon dedication of the land for a park as provided in Section 3(a) of this MOU, Mc shall complete construction of the park improvements similar to other public parks of the same size and classification at a cost to be agreed upon by City and Mc prior to the issuance of the 608th building permit. 4. Restatement and Amendment of DevelQpment ALreement No-5. In accordance with the Development Agreement Statutes, City agrees to negotiate in good faith and process 04-15-96 10026-00002 3 S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3 within six (6) months of the date of this MOU a restatement and amendment of Development Agreement No. 5 relating to Temeku ('Amended Development Agreement"). 5. Term of Amended and Restated DevelMment ALreement. The term of the amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5 shall be ten (10) years. 6. County Public Facilities and Service E=. The Amended Development Agreement shall eliminate the County Public Facilities Fee as it may be applied to Temeku and substitute a City development impact fee and development agreement premium fee applicable to residential dwelling units constructed in Temeku which shall be referred to in this MOU as the "City Public Facilities Fee". 7. City Public Facilities Fee. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide for the payment of a City Public Facilities Fee in the amount adopted by City for each detached or attached residential unit constructed by McMillin or any other merchant builder of residential units within the Temeku @. Based on the Development Impact Fee Study prepared by David M. Gffft & Associates, Ltd., dated January 8, 1996, the City Public Facility Fee for residential units is currently being considered in the amount of $3,970 per each detached dwelling unit. The City Public Facilities Fee under review by the City is broken down into different components and amounts for detached residential units as more particularly shown on Exhibit A attached to and made a part of this MOU by this reference. 8. Adjustment of City Public Facilities Fee. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide that the amount of the City's Public Facilities Fee for residential units within the Temeku subdivision shall be ad . usted each year from the date of recording the Amended Development Agreement based on the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Region. 9. Develol2ment Agreement Fee. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide that in consideration of City granting vested development rights, McMillin shall pay a premium development agreement fee which shall be added to the City Public Facility Fee in an amount of a 10% increase to each component of the City Public Facilities Fee as shown in Column 2 of Exhibit A. 10. Payment of City Public Facilifies F=. The City Public Facilities Fee, including the Development Agreement Fee, @ be paid at the time of issuance of building permits for each residential dwelling unit to be constructed in Temeku subject to the provisions of Sections 1 1 and 12 of this MOU. 11.Public Benefits and Credits. In consideration of McMillin dedicating and improving apublic park as provided in this MOU, as well as setting aside substantial private usable openspace associated with the golf course and providing the existing Veterans Park, the 04-15-96 10026-00002 4 S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3 Park and Recreation Impact Fees component of the City Public Facilities Fee shall be adjusted m the amount as shown in Column 4 on Exhibit A. In @er consideration of McMiUin's @cial contribution to certain improvements to the 1-15/Rancho California Road off-ramp and the widening of portions of Rancho California Road as provided in the Improvement Agreement, the Street System Impact Fees Component of the City Public Facilities Fee shall be adjusted in the amount as shown in Column 4 on Exhibit A. 12. Total Park and Recreation Impact Fees Oblipstion. Column 5 of Exhibit A sets forth the adjusted Park and Recreation Impact Fees for detached residential units in the amount of $1,327.40 per unit. Assuming Temeku is approved for development with 1,666 detached residential units, McMila's total Park and Recreation Impact Fees obligation would be $1,327.40 x 1,666 DU's = $2,211,448.40. 13. Payment of the Park and R fion Tmpwt Fees for First 608 Dwelling @. In consideration for Mc constructing and paying for the cost of constructing the park as provided in this MOU, the Park and Recreation Impact Fees of the City Public Facilities Fee as shown in Column 5 on Exhibit A for the first 608 building permits issued for residential dwelling units in the Temeku subdivision shall not be imposed. The amount of the City Public Facilities Fee for the first 608 Temeku dwelling units would therefore be $2,282. 10. 14. Remainine Park and R tion Fees Ob]iLyaWm. McMi@'s Park and Recreation Impact Fees obligation for all dwelling units constructed after 608 units would be based on the number of approved dwelling units remaining minus the cost of the park improvements. For example, if McMillin spends $1,000,000.00 on park and recreation improvements, this amount would be subtracted from Mc@'s total Park and Recreation Impact Fees obligation ($2,211,448.40 - $1,000,000.00) resulting in a remaining obligation of $1,211,448.40 which would be spread over the balance of (1,666 - 608 DU's) 1,058 dwelling units. 15. Interim Public Facilities E=. Pending adoption of the City Public Facilities Fee and approval of the Amended Development Agreement by City, McNfillin shall pay an Interim Public Facilities Fee of $2,282. 10 per each Temeku residential dwelling unit. 16. Preference. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide that in the event City approves a City Public Facility Fee or any component of the City Public Facilities Fee in an amount which is less ffin the amount(s) provided on Exhibit A or if City approves, a City Public Facility Fee or any component thereof for any other detached residential dwelling units in an amount(s) which is less than applicable to the Temeku residential dwelling units, or if the City approves a Development Agreement Fee which is less than provided in this MOU, City shall adjust the amounts of City Public Facility or any component thereof and/or the Development Agreement Fee applicable to the Temeku detached residential dwelling units as shown on Exhibit A to equal the lesser fee amount(s). If any attached dwelling units are constructed in 04-15-96 10026-00002 5 S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3 Temeku, City agrees to apply the adopted components and fees for attached residential umts with the same proportional adjustments as shown on Exhibit A. 17. Conversion of Temeku Private Roads to Public Streets. City agrees to accept as part of the public street system the roadway design and set back widths from curbs shown on approved plans and recorded tract maps. McMillin will dedicate necessary easements to accommodate sidewalks. 18. F-xtension of Tract Maps. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide for automatic extension of tentative tract maps for the term of the amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5 pursuant to Section 66452.6 of the California Government Code. 19. Tentative Tract M=s - Perimeter WaUs. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide that tract map conditions shall be amended to provide that the construction of perimeter walls, landscaping and installation of irrigation systems shall be constructed in phases as the adjacent tracts are developed within Temeku. 20. Tentative Tract No. 23371-15. The City shall approve Tentative Tract No. 23371- 15 subdividing into lots the remaining portion of the golf course not included as part of other Temeku U= maps. Mv mapping of the golf course is for fi=cing purposes with a goal of being accomplished by April 9, 1996 or as soon thereafter that is reasonably possible. 21. Maintenance of Exterior Landscape Areag and Collector Streets. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide for the consideration by City of maintaining all exterior landscape areas a4jacent to main collector withm the development (66" width). AU interior landscape areas must be maintained by a homeowners association. The City will not maintain block waus or entry monuments. 22. Mirpgrita Road Reimbursement. McMiUin's obligation to reimburse City for the cost of constructing certain roadway improvements to the east side of Margarita Road from Rancho California Road to Las Serena shall be $185.00 per residential unit applicable to the first 800 residential units constructed in the Temeku subdivision. 23. F-xtension of Tentative Tract No. 23371. It is agreed ffig pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 66452.6, applicable to the f@g of multiple final maps, the life of Tentative Tract No. 23371 is extended until November 8, 2000. 24.Indemnity and Cost of T,itipation. 24.1 County Litigation Concerning MQU. In the event the County seeks to challenge the right of City and McMillin to enter into this MOU, and institutes an action, suit, or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the enforcement of this MO.U, City 04-15-96 10026-00002 6 S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3 and Mc@ agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against the parties, @ officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all such obligations, liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment or lien, resulting from such action(s) brought by County, (but excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share, the costs associated with attorneys, fees, and costs @ the may incur as the result of any such action or lawsuit to challenge City and/or McMiUin's legal authority to enter into this MOU. If the County action is against all impacted developments for which the City has lowered the County Public Facilities Fee, Mc 's defense costs herein shall be its pro rata share among all impacted landowners based on a fi-action, the numerator of which is the total units owned by McMillin which are subject to this MOU and the denominator is the total number of units within the City in which the City has lowered the County Public Facilities Fee. If the County action is only against McMillin with respect to this MOU, and not against other impacted landowners for which the City has lowered the County Public Facilities Fee, then McMillin's defense costs shall be 100% of the attorneys' fees and costs for defense of the litigation. Damages (including the difference in the amount of the City Public Facilities Fee and the amount of the County Public Facilities Fee paid by Mc to City pursuant to the terms of this MOU) shall be the responsibility of Mc . To the extent Mc@ has paid City Public Facilities Fees and/or County Public Facilities Fee to City of which it is adjudicated are lawfully the funds of County, City shall pay such sums to County and McMillm shall have such liability for the payment of the difference between such fees reduced by ttit Pmount paid by the City. City and Mc@ shall mutually agree on legal counsel to be retained to defend any such action(s) brought by the County as herein provided. City and Mc@ each reserve the right to withdraw from the defense of the County litigation in the event the County prevails at the @ level and there is an appeal. If either party withdraws after the @ and there is an appeal, the remaining party @ pay all the costs and fees associated with said appeal. 24.2 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of this MOU and a trial court determines that McMillin and/or the City is liable to make up any shortfall between the amount of the City Public Facilities Fee and the County Public Facilities Fee which would otherwise have been imposed pursuant to Development Agreement No. 5, then Mc@ shall be responsible for paying any such shortfall subject to City's payment to County of any amounts collected and held by City under the terms of Development Agreement No. 5. Such payment by City to County shall reduce Mc@'s liability to County for payment of such fees by a like amount paid by City. 24.3 County Prevails in Litigation - Severability. In the event the County prevails at the trial court level against the City or McMillin as described in Section 5.1 of this MOU, the amount of the City Public Facilities Fee shall revert to the amount of the County Public Facilities Fee in effect at the time of entry of the final judgment in favor of the County (or such lesser amount as determined by the Court). In the event this MOU is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a UW court of competent jurisdiction, McMillin shall thereafter pay the, County 04-15-96 10026-00002 7 S:\DDC\152\96010023.Ml3 Public Facilities Fee as provided in Development Agreement No. 5 (or such lesser amount as determined by the Court). AR other provisions of this MOU or any subsequent agreements relating to the Temeku project shall remain valid and enforceable notwithstanding said ruling of invalidity. 24.4 Third PalU LitiL7ation ConcerninL, MOU. McMillin shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against City, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of @ MOU or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to @ MOU brought by a NW party other than the County. City shall promptly notify McMillin of any such claims, action, or proceeding, and City shall cooperate in the defense. If City fails to promptly no@ McMillin of any such claim, action, or proceeding or if City fails to cooperate in the defense, McMillin shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless City. City may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action, or proceeding. 24.5 Termination of MOU. If the amended and m=ted Development Agreement No. 5 is approved by the City Council, this MOU shall terminate upon the effective date of the ordmance approving the amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5. If the amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5 is disapproved by the City Council or the voters of the City, then the obligations of Mc@ under this Memorandum shall terminate and McNfiUin thereafter shall be subject to the terms of Development Agreement No. 5. 25. Jurisdiction. This MOU is made and entered into in the State of California, and this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided for herein shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 26.Severability. If any portion, provision or part of this MOU is held, determined, or adjudicatedto be invalid, unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such portion, provision, orpart @ be severed from the remaining portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU and @ not affect the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions, provisions, or parts. 27.Entire ALreement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with to the matters referred to herein. No other representations, covenants, undertaidngs or other prior to contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, respecting such matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed this MOU in reliance on any such promises, representations, or warranty. 28. Construction. This MOU @ not be construed against the party preparing it, but be construed as if both parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party. 04-15-96 10026-00002 8 S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3 29. Amendment of ALyreemol. This MOU shall not be modified by either party by oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. AU modifications must be in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them. 30. Time of theP-%qmce. Time is of the essence for the perfommce of each and every covenant and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this MOU. 31. No Precommitment. City and Mc understand and agree that cerliin actions of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal procedures, regulations and public heafings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a precommitment to any discretionary decision or a requirement of the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any discretionary actions contemplated in implementing the intent of the parties set forth in this MOU. 32. Counterparta. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IN S F, the executed this Memorandum as of the date set forth hereinabove. CrrY OF TEMECULA By: Karel Lindemans, Mayor ATTMT: McMELLIN PROJECT SERVICES, INC., a corporation June S. Greek, City Clerk By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 04-15-96 10026-00002 9 S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3 ITEN4 29 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR TOR 0 CITY MANA( CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:City Commissioner Term Limits and Monthly Compensation RECOMMENDATION:Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: 1)ORDINANCE NO. 96 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TERM LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS. 2) ORDINANCE NO. 96 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS. BACKGROUND: Currently, City Commissioners are limited, by Ordinance 2.40.030, to serve in no more than two (2) full, consecutive terms which equate to six (6) years. This limit will be reached by several City Commissioners in the coming year. This six (6) year, artificially imposed limit, would result in these commissioners being required to resign their posts. These resignations would result in the City losing a wealth of knowledge and history regarding various City projects. This could potentially impact the quality of review that projects currently receive at the commission level. The role of the Community Service, Planning, and Public Safety/Traffic Commissions is critical to the ultimate success of the projects that are built in Temecula. By having top notch commissioners, all residents of the City benefit. In addition, if the commissioners wish to continue their service beyond six (6) years, and the City Council is satisfied with their performance and wish to reappoint them, it would be to the community's advantage to allow these commissioners to continue to serve. R:@IER.DAaEPOR=AFF29.MIS In addition, staff has completed a survey of commissioner term lengths and found the majority of cities in the area, including Chino, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Norco, Rancho Cucamonga, San Marcos, Escondido, and Vista, do not have term limits. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with term limits. The total cost of monthly compensation is $12,000. Finally, on March 12, 1996, the City Council directed staff to compensate commissions as follows: Planning Commission $1 00 per month Public Safety/Traffic Commission $50 per month, and Community Services/Parks Commission $50 per month This compensation will begin on 07/01/96. This ordinance change is required in order to accurately reflect the City Councils decision to compensate Commissioners. R:\LANIER-DAB-EPORT\SrAFF29.MIS 2 ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEM[ECULA ING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE CULA MUNICIEPAL CODE PERTAWNG TO TERM LBUTS FOR CITY CO SIONERS. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings, The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That there is a need to amend Section 2.40.030 setting term limits for City Commissioners. B. Several current Commissioners will be forced to resign unless this ordinance is amended. C. The resignation of these Commissioners would result in the City losing a wealth of knowledge and history regarding various City projects and could potentially impact the quality of review that projects currently receive at the commission level. Section 2. Section 2.040.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: "Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, or by ordinance or resolution of the city council, all members of commissions of the city shall, at all times during their incumbencies, be bona fide residents and registered voters of the city. No member of any commission shall be a city employee, nor shall any person be a member of more than one commission at any one time". Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\LANIER-DA\REPORT,STAFF29.MIS 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of 1996. Karel F.. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [S@] STATE OF CAIJFORNIA) COUNTY OF I]DE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Ordinance No. 96- - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - th day of _, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the -th of 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNC ERS: NOES: COUNC ERS: ABSENT: COUNC ERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:@IEP,DA\REPOR'RSTAFF29.MIS 4 ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA ING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMIECULA MUNICI]PAL CODE PEKI'ANNG TO MONTHLY CO SATTON FOR CITY CO SIONERS. THE FOLLOWING COUNC]IL FOR TBE CITY OF CULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings, The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That the City Council wishes to amend Section 2.40. 100 to provide monthly compensation for City Commissioners. B.Monthly compensation for Commissioners includes: Planning Commission Public Safety/Tr-affic Commission Community Services/Parks Commission $100 per month $50 per month, and $50 per month Section 2. Section 2.040. 100 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: "City Commissioners shall receive monthly compensation as follows: Planning Commission $ 1 00 per month Public Safety/Traffic Commission $50 per month, and Community Services/Parks Commission $50 per month." Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:@IEP,DA\P-EPORT,STAFF29.MIS PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ]]DE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 96- - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - th day of _, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the -th of _, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNC ERS: NOES: COUNC ERS: ABSENT: COUNC ERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:\LANIER.DA\REPOR'RSTAFF29.NUS 6 DEPART]N4ENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC'TO IL_CITY MANAGER'@., CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for March, 1996. r:\agdrpt\inoactTt/ajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report APRIL, 1996 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak@ Prepared by: Don Spagnol Date:April 23, 199@ 1. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications: The contractor began construction on February 12, 1996 and has completely cleared the site. The contractor is in the process of delivering and compacting the soil for the northbound off-ramp, replacing the existing drainage channel adjacent to Palm Plaza with a underground storm drain and grading of the northbound shoulder. The contractor is scheduled to begin bridge falsework construction immediately after the placement of concrete barrier rail along the sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. The project provides for the widening of the Winchester Road Bridge over the 1-1 5 freeway, the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and the construction of a new northbound loop ramp. 2. Sports Park Parking and Skate Board Park: The contractor has completed the irrigation system and is working on the final landscape planting. The remainder of the park improvements are scheduled to be completed by the end of April, 1996. The park will be opened for public use after the 90-day maintenance period. 3. Fire Station #84: The contractor has placed concrete for the building foundation and has begun construction of the masonary walls. Installation of underground conduit and piping for the building is also underway. The contractor expects to start grading for the Pauba Road widening during the second week of April. The project is scheduled to be completed by the fall of 1996. This project includes, new sewers, road improvements on Pauba Road between the new church site and Margarita Road, construction of the new fire station and landscaping. 4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project: Construction began on February 20, 1996 and is scheduled to be completed by September of 1996. The contractor has placed the concrete for the restroom building foundation and has begun construction of the masonary walls. Grading is nearly complete and the landscaping work has started. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and restroom facility, asphalt pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596 Monthly A ctfvity Report April 23, 1996 Page 2 parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. 5. Pavement Management System The contractor has completed all the paving work except for Pala Road, which should begin the week of April 15, 1996. The remaining work to be done includes striping, raising manholes to the new pavement elevation, sawcutting and installing new traffic loops. There are seven (7) roadways that have be rehabilitated, four (4) are arterial, which includes portions of Margarita Road, Pala Road, Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, and three (3) are secondary streets at various locations throughout the City. The project should be completed by May 1, 1996. 6. Walcott Corridor: The City is in the process of acquiring right-of-way at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol and accepting the offers of dedication throughout the project for public street and utility purposes. An appraisal has been completed and an offer for the land has been given to the property owner. A resolution for the acquisition of the property and the offers of dedication will be on the City Council agenda for the April 23, 1996 meeting. The project will provide for the realignment of an underground waterline and a paved road surface on Nicolas Road, Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, Walcott Lane and La Serena Way. 7. Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkwu A complete 4-way traffic signal will be installed as part of the project as well as the removal of the median island on the south leg of the intersection to provide for a dual north bound left turn pocket. The agreement between the County of Riverside and the City for the costs of the design and construction has been executed by the County. Construction will begin following the installation of the underground storm drain in the intersection proposed by the County Assessment District (AD 159) Project which is scheduled for June. 8. Interim Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Pala Road A contract was awarded to Peek Traffic Inc. on March 12, 1996. This project will install a 3-way interim traffic signal at Route 79S and Pala Road. The ultimate improvements will be constructed when the new Pala Road Bridge is constructed and the highway is widened. A pre-construction meeting is scheduled for April 1 1, 1 996. The notice to proceed will be issued following the pre-construction meeting. pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596 Monthly Acdvity Report April 23, 1996 Page 3 9. Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No.-5 This project is expected to be awarded at the April 23, 1996 City Council meeting. The project will provide new sidewalk on the north side of Santa Cecilia Drive between Mira Loma Drive and Cosmic Drive. 10. Barrier Rail on Front St. at Emgire Cme-k The contractor has completed the barrier rail on both sides of Front Street at Empire Creek. This project was Federally funded under the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). This project is designed to install a barrier rail on each side of Front Street at Empire Creek so that vehicles that deviate from the roadway will not enter the channel. 11. OUT TO BID 1. Interim Traffic Signal at Route 79S and La Paz Street Final plans & specifications have been approved by Caltrans and an encroachment has been issued. The project has been advertised for bid and the bid opening date is April 25, 1996. A 4-way interim traffic signal will be installed as part of the project at the intersection of Route 79S and La Paz Street. The ultimate signal and striping improvements will be constructed when the highway is widened. 2. Sgorts Park Creek Restoration Advertisement for bids began on March 18th and the bid opening is scheduled for April 1 1, 1996. The project includes the installation of landscaping and gabion slope protection along the channel slopes to mitigate erosion. Underground drainlines will be installed to reduce ball field surface ponding. A decomposed granite pathway is to be constructed along the north channel bank with a concrete walkway adjacent to the pathway which will bid as an add-alternate. pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596 Monthly Acdvfty Report April 23, 1996 Page 4 111.WORK IN DESIGN 1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: This project provides for the widening of the Rancho California Road bridge over the I- 1 5 freeway and construction of a northbound loop on-ramp. Utility relocations are being coordinated with Southern California Gas Company and Rancho California Water District. The County of Riverside is appraising two parcels that are required for the construction of the northbound exit ramp. The City returned plan check comments to the consultant the week of March 25, 1996. Final revisions will be made by the consultant and resubmitted to Caltrans. 2. 1-15/Overiand Drive Overcrossing Improvements The consultant has revised the roadway and structural plans and resubmitted to Caltrans the week of March 18, 1996. The consultant will revise the structural plans when they receive the electrical relocation sheets for the 12 KV and 33 KV power lines. SCE is currently trying to find a route for the relocation of the 1 1 5 KV power lines. 3. Cily Wide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS) Data collection has been completed and the consultant is preparing a discussion paper for the proposed improvements as well as various options on the available hardware and software. This project will interconnect all major arterials and will coordinate traffic signals along the major corridors in the city. This project has been funded by Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds which is a federal funding source and is administered by Caltrans. 4. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive The design consultant has submitted plans for first plan check and the City returned the comments back to the consultant on April 10, 1996. The County Assessment District 161 Project is proposing to widen Winchester Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Margarita Road. The street widening project will be detouring traffic from Winchester Road onto Margarita Road. The traffic signal is expected to be in place before the traffic is detoured on to Margarita Road which should take place iri'June. Due to the urgency to install the traffic signal the City is now in the process of ordering the poles, controller cabinet and controller due to the length of delivery time for the traffic signal equipment. pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596 Monthly A ctfvity RePort April 23, 1996 Page 5 5. Emergency Generat@r. The project includes installing an emergency generator at the Community Recreation Center to provide power for emergency operations. A meeting was held on April 1 1, 96 to review the final design revisions with the consultant. The consultant will revise the plans and will be re-submitting to the City within the next two weeks. Staff anticipates requesting authorization to solicit public construction bids f rom the Council in April. 6. Margarita Community Park: The plans and specifications were submitted for preliminary review on April 3, 1996. The project includes picnic areas, a tot play area, restroom facilities and open turf areas. The development of two ball fields on the School Districts property, two lighted tennis courts, and one lighted roller hockey facility will be bid as add- alternates. pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596 LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects MARCH 1996 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak@ Prepared by: Steven Cresswell@ Date:April 11, 1996 1. PW93-09 - Parkview Site: The Record of Survey for the exchanged property and the vacation/dedication of Pauba Road right-of-way are currently being prepared and processed. 2. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor: The Consultant is in the process of revising the street improvements and storm drain plans of Western Bypass Corridor from the bridge to Vincent Moraga Drive and the improvement plans of Vincent Moraga Drive extension in compliance with the CitV's and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's (RCFC&WCD) comments. The right of way dedication documents for Western Bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive extension are being amended in compliance with the City's comments. The Consultant is also analyzing the impacts associated with the location of the westerly abutment of the Western Bypass Corridor bridge over Murrieta Creek as it pertains to Metropolitan Water District's (MWD) facilities. 3. PW95-08 - First Street Extension: RCFC&WCD's consent on the flood study analysis on Murrieta Creek from its confluence at Temecula Creek upstream to Rancho California Road has been obtained. The Consultant is designing the street improvements of First Street from the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection to Western Bypass Corridor including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek. The right of way dedication documents have been completed. 4. RFP #38 - 6th Street Parking Probect: The Consultant is preparing the improvement plans for the entire project including the plans for the public restroom facility and the streetscape improvements. We anticipate bidding the project in May 1996. r:%moactrpt%devN96\March w CC s: 0 LU z LU Y. C4 r- cm PA I- X Z .4 C4 0. LLI ui CL (n LLJ U) 0 cc V) z z to w w Ut CL IC04 In E C,. w x cc 0 C4 q d C6 F7 It I w 8 z -C 9 ui c; 4* C4, LU U. in C,4, i fa C%i cli -C a 0 40 4* w -i CC! co u- U. co C4 4* Go cc 0 0. w x W - x -C 61 130 u in C4 w LU C,4 C,4 z S2 v- > 0 U. Ct > 0 co x 2 co co CO) qt C,4 46 v 0 C,4 0 CL I- 40 40 (.) U) LU U) z z ui U) CA 0 Cl) z M 0 0 w to co 8 RV C4 co CIO* fa CD Cl) LL V) C,4 ui V) Cl) 0LLI 0. z C,44 ICN4 IN CP) C3 z w LLJ is 8 8 > z 0 kn 0 0 cm C,4 0 = 2 CY 0. U) LU 0 4* 40 40 w CL w < ci 0 0) U. -i U) co - v qr qr 0 8 qr z 'CO I- d c4 w r Z 0 co Ln CD C'd m C%i tn Lu 'O Le cli I- 0 M U) 4* 4& 40 2 e ccr CD 0 co co z 0 U. z 0 z 0 ui ui Z 4 2 2 2 0 2 - g m w 0 C%i LLJ -i - z CL IL) IL LLI ul he z .00 w w 0 IL I- CL 0. 0 ui 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 E 0 - s; 0 0 0 0 w t- x u ui 0 w (.) LU m 1- > LU IL i 0 0 0 0 > z co a m w z > w (L -C CL z LU lo -C m z U. ui w 0 CL 2 0 2 ui < U. IL z CL 0 MEMORANDUM TO:@ioseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: April 1, 1996 SUBJECT:Monthly Activity Report - March, 1996 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of March, 1996: 1. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 40 B. Total signs installed 25 C. Total signs repaired 1 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 7 Ill. POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired 189 IV.CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 82 V.RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 12,230 VI.GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 25 B. Total S.F. 6,258 VII.STENCILING A.220 new and repainted legends B.130 L.F. of red curb new and repainted C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - March 1 996 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 28 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 26 service order requests for the month of January, 1996. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 60 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the following 0400 L.F. of new and repainted striping 0 676 L.F. of sand blasting The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $929.03 compared to $0 for February, 1996. PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the following 984,451 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $11,420.00 compared to $10,126.R3 for February, 1996. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 1996 was $60,673.58 compared to $28,911.83 for the month of February, 1996. Account No. 5402 $ 56,538.58 Account No. 5401 1,690.00 Account No. 999-5402 2,445.00 cc:Steve Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:\roads\actrptX96\03 rh STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March. ACCOUNT NO, 100-164-601-5401 DING@@&@@FA . ..... DATE STREET/CHANNELIBRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/05/96 Ynez @ Empire Creek west Remove existing hardware, hinges and $1,690.00 AND side locks from three (3) swing gates. Weld in 03/06/96 new heavy duty barren hinges and tongue plate lock latch for clam shell locks. Includes all material and labor. Does not include clam locks. Two 80' cleanout gates. Total Acct. No. 5401 $1,690.00 ACCOUNT NO, 100-164-601-5402 NELSONPAVING@@&SEALING,@. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/12/96 31073 Del Rey Road 1 R&R A.C. at edge of pavement $2,851.00 (25'x3' and 4' x l') = 79 sq. Ft. (4'xl' area is at washed out area) 2.Install 6" A.C. curb 1 1 5 Ln. Ft. east of downspout and 5 Ln. Ft. west of downspout = 120' of 6' A.C. curb 3.Excavate area for concrete downspout to a 2' to l' slope and install concrete downspout (1 1'x8') = 88 sq. ft. 4.Backfill area that is wash out (1 5'x 1 O') Total A.C. = 7 Tons L.WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, INC.,:... DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST MARCH/96 Villages Area Class 1 trimmed 317 R.O.W. trees $9,930.00 r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh W. Go cn qt N 0 0 in 0 In w T- P- cm z -4 CR w 0 T- 0 co 14 CY) co o Lu >- C4 p- 0 p- 0 C,4 0 C4 C4 ei C-i ci C4 0 in 0) C) Ul) co N N Pt Vi Pt et @ w 0 L) T- v- tD P- 4w) Ul) C) Re 0) to cn V) Rt co C4 co CO) ffi La W) 4& ww 0: C) W) cn cn C) CD gn C) W) CD C,4 0 < CD C,4 CD CD IV CD C4 co p- CD LLI >- 4s ui c; c; CT; co C4 W) 4w) in C,4 C4 to co U) -J 0 < CL co 4m W) CD p- -W u CD cq cq IZ 96 VZ C6 CD w to f, C,4 cn 40 40 E cn cL 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 CD 14 0 C,4 0 0 U) 0 CD 0 CD CD 0 N c:o to 0 C4 40 z 0 c; c; C5 ti c; c; IZ wi C6 ci 40 C" W) 0 C) w to cc CD C4 C" C,4 v- W) 4= o cq VZ cq W) *V to 0 CD 0 c:o 0 Ul) CD w LO CD CD CD CD C,4 0 C,4 t- t- 4= CD ui z 0 0 c; C5 ci C,4 C,4 40 CD C) C* LO to cn CD CD w tn CD N c:i tn C4 m tn cn IV o cq 40 Ci ww z @ z @ v- 40 40 40 C" CD CD c:o 0 P- co W) LU C-4 M 0 C,4 CD U z U.) W 0 (L C,4 0 CO u 0 C/) Ln 0 CD C4 0 t- co 0 to C4 le C'4 co CD C,4 w I- z N C,4 0 in CD C4 m cq C%i CL z cn 0 cr 0 L: 0 U- cm 0 0 m .0 .0 cn m z Co 0 LU co c cn LU 0 Co co -J m 0 0 It LL LLJ U) z It L) C) < 0 U) ui a! EL z LLI cl cc LU z LL,w U, =) zru. U) ui rt u :) 0 Cl) -1 ui EL LL LL L.) LLI _j F- z LL -1 4 x m it z z cl) a, < cl < p: ui LU LU z w Z z u z z u 0 Co :3 a. w 3: LU a LU 0 ;u 0 6 9 U- z U) z U) z < X 0 - :D E n (n z CZ LLI (L 0 0 Lu < n LU R 0 Z z (L 0 Et :c (D X: IX I- F- ui LL z U) U) (4 - Z U5 U) Cl) @@1MPLES &:ASSOCIATES:]:::: DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/19/96 Commerce Center Drive Remove and replace concrete. $12,521.55 TO 03/21/96 1. Curb & Gutter 215 L.F. 2. Drive Approach 205 S.F. 3. Drive Way 325 S.F. 4. Sidewalk 1,770 S.F. Total S.F. 2,515 Total P.C.C. 33 Yards WEST COAST ARBORISTS, @INC.@7 DATE STREET/CHANNELIBRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST MARCH/96 Meadowview Area Class 1 trimmed 457 R.O.W. trees. $18,887.00 Removed and stump grind 1 tree. Total-Acct. 100-164-601-5402 $44,189.55 ACCOUNT NUMBER 195-180-999-5402 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING...... DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/18/96 Calle dapos Grade roads due to rains. $2,445.00 and Calle Girasol 03/19/96 Gatlin Road Greenwood Lane John Warner Road Kimberly Lane Liefer Road Lolita Road Ormsby Road Pala Vista Paulita Road Santiago Road Walcott Lane Total Acct. No. 195-180-999-5402 $2,44,5.00 r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh MAPLES & ASSOCIATES DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/19/96 Commerce Center Drive Remove and replace concrete. $12,521.55 TO 03/21/96 1 - Curb & Gutter 215 L.F. 2. Drive Approach 205 S.F. 3. Drive Way 325 S.F. 4. Sidewalk 1,770 S.F. Total S.F. 2,515 Total P.C.C. 33 Yards WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.:. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST MARCH/96 Meadowview Area Class 1 trimmed 457 R.O.W. trees. $18,887.00 Removed and stump grind 1 tree. Total-Acct. 100-164-601-5402 $44,189.55 ACCOUNT NUMBER 195-180-999-5402 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST 03/1 8/96 Calle e@pos Grade roads due to rains. $2,445.00 and Calle Girasol 03/19/96 Gatlin Road Greenwood Lane John Warner Road Kimberly Lane Liefer Road Lolita Road Ormsby Road Pala Vista Paulita Road Santiago Road Walcott Lane Total Acct. No. 195-180-999-5402 $2,445.00 r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh LL: LL: LL: e* m 0) C,4 w 1. to PA C-4 n W 0 V- P. IA C4 " v- * C,4 fa to PA co on co C4 It ti It C4 Pt Ci ri ei a fa P. co 40 P. I v. so co IR ko 60 -t to p- to C4 0) 4* 4* 4* ww to C) In 40 C* ko cm t- 4a CD co 11 C4 C, 'm w -t C4 m V, co tA to 40 't cl Ci @ a; cm C4 C4 a C4 C4 co V) C4 -M cn C4 co cm C4 40 gn m 'o 4D 'O CD CD CD P. co ID 40 C, 44 cm W M M 0. C, IR OR a) w 1. co cm t- -C C4 p- %q t- w oo ID 4n C4 w u@. C) ui w 40 CD 40 0) 0 to CD v 0 0 CD .0 co t- in CD m -e cn CD IR lm " " = o w w w n w C4 C! IR P% Ci 0 CD 't cm ci C4 rt co C4 CD co a) lo 10 co so co CD pi 40 - cwn Ci Ct &o cn 00 C4 ce 0 w CD PA CD LU %S CD LL co co u: 4) -* c L4 C." z z CO !5 -0 E tA Z 4n .., P- gm F- uj F- UJ to LLI tD C LL U) CO CO CO) F- c v co 0 . z @ L 0 0 0 CO 0.0 i ;- LL. C4 CD -J to 0 0 V5 co 4) CD r.) 0 L) 0) a co a, 0 CD to IM z 0,60 0 -ago M rj -ci z C? s m Z r- - -o 4 UJ to ci < t z = $A r ul IA c c 0 U cn 0) cn I- ui i- c; :E C)0. 0. c -S 4D c ci ul tA 0 o LLI LM.LM ii - ii C: v u 0 >. = >. m o n 0 0 0 U. IX U>, LL u 0 a (a co F- I- p- F' 0- IL ce b- E5 'U) U) u I- IL 4 U) CD I- LL 0: cc DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 CATCH BASIN CLEANING WORK COMPLETED DATE LOCATION 03-05-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Cleaned 24 Basins 03-13-96 Areas #1, & #2. Cleaned 28 Basins 03-1 3-96 Areas #1 #2, #3, & #4. Cleaned 18 Basins 03-14-96 Areas #1, #2, #3, & #4. Cleaned 12 Basins TOTAL 82 BASINS CLEANED pwO3\road\wkcmpltd\96\03.CB 040896 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 DEBRIS DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03-11-96 Area #1 Loads of Debris 3 03-11-96 Area #1 Bags of Trash 5 03-12-96 Rancho California Road Load of Debris 1 @ Margarita & Meadows 03-13-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Load of Debris 1 03-13-96 Cabrillo @ John Warner Sand Removal 4 Yards 03-14-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Load of Debris 1 PWO3\ROADS\WKCMPLTD\96\03.DEBRIS 040896 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 GRAFFITI REMOVAL WORKCOMPLETED@ LOCATION DATE 03-04-96 28859 Pujol Street Removed 100 S.F. of Graffiti 03-05-90- Calle Aranda @ Via Norte Removed 30 S.F. of Graffiti 03-07-96 Empire Creek @ Ynez Road Removed 138 S.F. of Graffiti 03-07-86 Winchester @ San Gertrudes Creek Removed 4 S. F. of Graffiti 03-08-96 Empire Creek @ Ynez Road Removed 25 S. F. of Graffiti 03-11-96 Rancho California Road Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti @ Moraga Road 03-11-96 Rancho California Road Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti N/0 Business Park Drive 03-12-96 Pujol Street @ First Street Removed 6 S. F. of Graffiti 03-14-96 Meadows Parkway @ Ranch Water Reservoir Removed 90 S. F. of Graffiti 03-15-96 Community Recreation Center Removed 5 S. F. of Graffiti 03-20-96 Vintage Hills Drive @ Channel Removed 1,078 S. F. of Graffiti 03-21-96 Park @ Ave. del la Reina Removed 48 S.F. of Gri 03-22-96 Long Valley Wash Removed 1,645 S. F. of GratTiti 03-22-96 Solana Way @ Ynez Road Removed 8 S. F. of Graffiti 03-25-96 Rancho California Road @ Removed 128 S. F. of Graffiti Meadows Parkway 03-25-96 Rancho California Road @ Removed 25 S. F. of Graffiti Calle Tajo 03-25-96 Humber @ Long Valley Wash Removed E - S. F. of Graffiti 03-26-96 Community Recreation Center Removed 35 S. F. of Graffiti 03-28-96 Hwy. 79 S @ Ave. de Missions Removed 1,228 S. F. of Graffiti 03-29-96 Ynez Road @ Preece Removed 105 S. F. of Graffiti 03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 40 S.F. of Graffiti @ YI-1 -1 03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 162 S. F. of Graffiti @ Cosmic 03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 645 .- S.F. of Graffiti @ Long Valley Wash pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03. Graffiti 040396 GRAFFITI @OVAL - MARCH 1996 3-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 76 S.F. of Graffiti @ Moraga Road 03-29-96 Yukon @ Humber Removed 36 S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL S.F. 6,258 TOTAL LOCATIONS 25 -2- pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.Graffiti 040396 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG .. .. ...... . ".@@:LO ON@@.. EQUE 1:@WORK. OMPLETE . DA. - 03-01-96 30151 Santiago Road Water running through 03-01-96 property- 03-04-96 28559 Pujol Street Graffiti 03-04-96 03-04-96 30463 Danube Court Tree trimming 03-04-96 03-04-96 N. Gen. Kearney @ Street repairs 03-04-96 Margarita 03-05-96 30558 Iron Bark Tree trimming 03-05-96 03-05-96 43737 Buckeye Road Sidewalk repair 03-05-96 03-05-96 41399 Ave. de la Reina Plugged storm drain 03-05-96 03-05-96 County Center Drive Potholes 03-06-96 03-06-96 30241 Sierra Madre Pothole 03-06-96 03-06-96 30130 Via de la Mesa 8' Bush blocking sight 03-06-96 03-07-96 31325 Pahuta Street Backyard flooding 03-07-96 03-07-96 31141 Del Rey Road Tree trimming 03-07-96 03-08-96 42078 Sweet Shade Lane Tree trimming 03-08-96 03-08-96 41965 Kaffirboom Court Tree trimming 03-08-96 03-11-96 41588 Big Sage Court Tree trimming 03-11-96 03-11-96 41836 Corte Valentine Street crack in street 03-11-96 03-11-96 41735 Winchester A frame sign missing 03-12-96 03-11-96 41525 Ave. de la Reina Pothole 03-12-96 03-12-96 41854 6th Street Tree trimming 03-12-96 03-12-96 41591 Willow Run Tree trimming 03-13-96 03-13-96 Willow Creek @ Pothole 03-13-96 N.Gen. Kearney 03-13-96 La Corona @ Via Norte Weeds 03-13-96 03-19-96 Liefer Road Grading 03-19-96 03-21-96 41830 Rio Grande Drive Tree trimming 03-21-96 03-22-96 i Rancho Vista Road Litter pick up 03-22-96 pwO3@dsNwkcmpltd\96\03.svsrq 040396 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG - MARCH, 1996 "3-26-96 41884 Borealis Drive Tree removal 03-26-96 03-26-96 45521 Classic Way Tree trimming 03-26-96 03-28-96 45755 Corte Rodrigo Helicopter spraying 03-28-96 TOTAL S.O.R.'S pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03-svsrq 040396 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 SIGNS DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED@ T 03-05-96 Via Renate S/0 Via La Vida Installed 2 N.H.W.S. 03-06-96 Margarita @ Ave. Barca Replaced W-41 "T.C." 03-06-96 Station #83 Installed 2 R-26 03-07-96 Monterey @ Ave. Barca Repaired R-1 03-07-96 Rancho California Road Replaced 2 Delineators E/O Margarita 03-08-96 Pauba @ Margarita Replaced 2W-17 2W-17A 03-11-96 Pala Road @ Hwy. 79 South Replaced W-1 7 "Faded" 03-11-96 De Portola Road @ Margarita Replaced 4 R-l's "Faded" 03-12-96 Rancho California Road @ Installed Adopt-A-Street Signs (2) Margarita 03-1 2-96 Rancho California Road @ Installed Adopt-A-Street Signs (2) Meadows 03-14-96 Rancho California Road Replaced Post and Sleeve for R-7 & R7 @ Town Center 03-18-96 Bedford @ Hwy. 79 South Replaced R-1 "Faded" 03-18-96 Clubhouse @ Bayhill Replaced R-1 "Faded" 03-18-96 Pala Road @ Masters Replaced R-1 "Faded" 03-18-96 Greensboro Drive @ Murfield Replaced R-1 Graffiti 03-18-96 Esmerado Court & Loma Linda Replaced R-1 EGG 03-18-96 Via Gilberto @ End of Street Replaced Type "N" "Faded" 03-1 8-96 Piute @ Huron Replaced 2 R-1 EGG 03-1 8-96 Huron @ Pala Road Replaced R-1 "Faded" 03-18-96 Via Eduardo @ End of Street Installed W-31, W-52, Type "N" 03-18-96 Baiderclay Court @ Felix Valdez Replaced R-1 EGG 03-18-96 Front Street @ Moreno Replaced R-1 "Faded" 03-20-96 Pala Road @ Wolf Valley Road Installed 3 W-1 7 3 W-1 7A 03-21-96 Quiet Meadows @ Ynez Road Replaced 3 'k-1 4 R-lA R-1 "Faded' 03-25-96 Willow Run @ La Serena Replaced R-1 "Faded' 03-25-96 Las Hacienda @ End of Street-T Replaced W-56 "Faded" F'WO3\ROADSfWKCMPLTT)\96\03.SIGN\INSTALL 040896 SIGNS - MAIETCH, 1996 3-25-96 Rancho California Road Replaced R-1 "Faded" @ Business Park Drive 03-25-96 Rancho Way @ Replaced R-1 'Faded" Business Park Drive 03-25-96 Dos Picos @ Diaz Road Replaced R-1 'Faded' 03-25-96 Rio Nedo @ Diaz Road Replaced R-1 'Faded' 03-25-96 Virgo @ Southern Cross Replaced R-1 EGGED 03-25-96 Mira Loma @ Rancho Vista Replaced 2 Type "K' Markers "T.C.' 03-25-96 Rancho Highland.@ Ynez Road Replaced R-1 'Faded" 03-26-96 Rancho California Road Replaced Type 'N' 'T.C." @ Moraga Road 03-26-96 Pauba Road E/O La Primavera Replaced Type "N" 'T.C." 03-26-96 Elinda @ Pauba Road Replaced R-1 Graffiti 03-26-96 Pauba Road W/O Replaced W-17 Graffiti Butterfield Stage 03-26-96 De Portoa Road @ Installed W-1 7 Margarita TOTAL SIGNS 40 REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS 1 REPAIRED PWO3\ROADSIWKCMPL'rD\96\03.SIGN\INSTALL 040896 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 STENCILING FDATE LOCATION. WORK COMPLETED 03-04-96 Sixth Street @ Pujol Painted 65 L.F. of Rec :urb 03-11-96 Sixth Street @ Pujol Painted 65 L.F. of Red Curb 03-20-96 Pala Road @ Wolf ValleyRoad Installed 20 New Legends 03-21-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 56 Legends 03-26-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 57 Legends 03-27-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 45 Legends 03-28-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 42 Legends TOTALLEGENDS 220 REPAINTED & INSTALLED TOTAL L.F. OF 130 RED CURB INSTALLED PWO3\ROADS\WKCMPLTD\96\03.STENCIIL 040496 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 TREE TRIMMING DATE LOCATION F I @ @ I I @: WORK@ COMPLETED 03-11-96 Area 1 Trimmed 2 Trees 03-13-96 Cabrillo @ John Warner Removed 1 Fallen tree 03-18-96 Front Street S/0 Removed 1 Tree Rancho California Road W/S 03-18-96 Classic Drive @ Murfield Trimmed 1 Tree 03-18-96 35302 Esplendor Court Trimmed 1 Tree 03-25-96 Dos Picos @ Diaz Road Trimmed 1 Tree TOTAL TREES TRIMMED 7 pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.TrR 040496 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION MARCH, 1996 WEEDS & DEBRIS ......... .. LOCA ION OMPLETF-D@ IbAi c 03-11-96 Area 1 Abated 12,130 S.F. 03-13-96 Via Norte @ La Corona Weed Removal 100 S.F. TOTAL S.F. 12,230 R.O.W. WEED ABATED pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.Weeds 040896 TRAMC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For March, 1996 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Martin Lauber 401? Date: April 9, 1996 TRAFFIC RF-QlJlF-'qTv, and PLAN CHECKS C REQMTS. JAN FEB Received 8 11 Completed 8 8 Active 31 34 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 4 @4 WORK ORDERS ISSUED. 2 5 STRIPING@ PLANS REVIEWED 1 1 2 @.ICCONTROI-PLANSREVIEV;ED 0 0 @@@4 TRAFFIC IMPACT@ STUDIES RE D 6 DIVISION PROJECTS* A.A new striping plan was designed in-house for Ynez Road from Santiago Road to Rancho Vim Road. We are able to take advantage of the re-@cing operation to completely change striping to accommodate additional protected left turn pockets. The portion of Margarita Road between Via La Vida and Moraga Road was also re-striped to add center left tam lanes. B .The Radar Trailer Display Unit was transferred to the Police Department's Traffic Division for implementation. Public Works staff is worldng closely with our Police Department regarding placement. The police will be able to greatly increase the visibility of this equipment. c .The entire Old Town street lighting system has been reviewed for deficiencies. All system short comings have been repaired to create a fully functioning system. This is the only public street lighting system currently maintained by Public Works. R.\IAOA Ck96\03.MAR-rh APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Building and Safety March 1996, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for March, 1996. Building Permits Issued 131 Building Valuation $11,737,641 Revenue Collected $125,898 Housing Starts 97 New Commercial Starts 3 87,232 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations 13 24,907 Sq.Ft. Building Inspections 2,468 Valuation FY Year-to-Date 87,752,717 Code Enforcement Actions 847 Active Cases Pending 50 Closed Cases 31 V:\W@@da\March'96.Rpt APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY I DIRECTOR OF FINANQE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Managi DATE: April 23, 1996 SUBJECT:Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION:Receive and File Discussion:The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for the month of February 1996: Caseload Activitys The Department received ten (8) applications for administrative cases and nine (5) applications for public hearing cases for the month of February. The following are the public hearing cases: Conditional Use Permit 1 General Plan Amendment 1 Plot Plan subj to CEQA 1 Temporary Use Permit 1 Plot Plan w/CEQA 1 TOTAL 5 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Streetscape Improvement Proiect* The Sixth Street Parking Lot Master Plan. Webb & Associates will be designing the offsite improvements and standards for the related components of the project. These will be used as design standards for off-site improvement in Old Town, along with the Old Town Streetscape Standards and was approved by the City Council at the March 12, 1996. The anticipated ground breaking for the 6th Street project is June 8, 1996. Murdy Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Rep= The draft Specific Plan and draft EIR have been submitted. Staff is conducting a review and will provide comments to the applicant. R:\MONTHLY.RM1996 CH.WPD 4/15196 vgw Johnson Ranch Spec*fic Plane Staff has sent a second letter to the applicant requesting to withdraw their application from the City. Raripaugh Ranch Specif*c Plans The Planning Commission held a public workshop on September 11, 1995 and directed the applicant to reduce the density and the total number of units as well as to be more sensitive to the surrounding land use by increasing the buffer area and providing a transition of lot sizes. The Commission provided additional direction to the applicant. No future hearing date has been established. Temecula Shuttle* Located along Front Street within the 6th Street public parking lot, this project includes construction of a 1860 square foot building, 4 bus spaces and public seating areas within landscaped areas. This project was approved at the February 22, 1996 Director's Hearing. The anticipated ground breaking is set for June 1996. School lml2act Mitoaation Plane DMG & Associates have completed their evaluation of the School District Mitigation Plan. Staff has prepared a school facility impact model to help assess the need for and cost of additional school facilities. Anticipated Proposition 203 funds have been included into the model. A copy of the DMG Study and the City's Model have been sent to the district and building industry. Annexation Guedelinesl The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines at their March 18, 1996 meeting. It will be scheduled for the City Council's consideration in May 1996. Soon Ordin The sign committee members were appointed by the City Council in March. The first meeting was held on April 2, 1996. The next meeting is scheduled for April 30, 1996. At the first meeting, staff presented a slide show for the committee. At the second meeting the committee will be evaluating signs in different parts of Temecula. Attachment: 1 . Revenue and Status Report - Page 3 R:\MONTHLY.RPIR1996 CH.WPD 4/15196 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:\MONTHLY.RFnl996 CH.WPD 4/15/96 vgw 3 REVPRIN2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 04/15/96 11:23:24 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1996 001 GENERAL FUND 161 PLANNING ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1995-96 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 4101 AMENDED FINAL MAP 4102 APPEALS 4103 CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE 4104EXTENSION OF TIME 4105SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS 4106MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS 4107PARCEL MAPS 4108LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 4109MINOR CHANGE 4110PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) 4111RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS 4112REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) 4113SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER 4114SECOND UNIT PERMITS 4115CHANGE OF ZONE 4116CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4117CONSISTENCY CHECKS 4118GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4119PLOT PLAN 4120PUBLIC USE PERMIT 4121REVISED PERMIT 4122SETBACK ADJUSTMENT 4123SPECIFIC PLAN 4124SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE 4125TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT 4126TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 4127VARIANCE 4128ZONING INFORMATION LETTER 4129CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) 4130CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT 4131DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 4132GEOLOGY CEQA 4133GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ 4134LAFCO 4135PARCEL MAP/WAIVER 4136MERGER 4137AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP 4138CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION 4139CONDO TRACT MAP 4140REVERSION TO ACREAGE 4141LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK 4142LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK 4143CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK 4144CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK 4145COND. CERT. OF COMPL. PLN. CK. 4146CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK .00 .00 .00 .00 325.00 .00 325.00 .00 100.0 800.00 356.00 756.00 44.00 94.5 6,000.00 268.00 3,100.00 2,900.00 51.7 6,850.00 .00 6,853.00 3.00- 100.0 5,332.00 .00 .00 5,332.00 0.0 8,996.00 .00 2,616.00 6,380.00 29.1 1,380.00 230.00 2,070.00 690.00- 150.0 940.00 .00 918.00 22.00 97.7 1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 392.00 .00 .00 392.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 520.00 .00 .00 520.00 0.0 13,256.00 .00 10,984.00 2,272.00 82.9 29,248.00 3,777.00 9,509.00 19,739.00 32.5 4,440.00 .00 .00 4,440.00 0.0 4,827.00 .00 8,415.00 3,588.00- 174.3 57,190.00 5,650.00 26,547.00 30,643.00 46.4 10,765.00 .00 8,004.00 2,761.00 74.4 6,446.00 .00 3,725.00 2,721.00 c'-g 1,250.00 .00 500.00 750.00 9,254.00 .00 590.00 8,664.00 1,715.00 370.00 4,208.30 2,493.30- 245.4 2,548.00 191.00 818.00 1,730.00 32.1 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,142.00 .00 571.00 571.00 50.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,732.00 10,622.65 10,622.65- 6,202.00 609.75 6,811.75 609.75- 109.8 4,000.00 .00 8,000.00 4,000.00- 200.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 500.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 784.00 .00 .00 784.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 REVPRIN2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 O/ '96 11:23:24 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1996 GENERAL FUND 161 PLANNING ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1995-96 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 4147 VACATIONS PLAN CK .00 .00 .00 .00 4148 DOCUMENT PROCESSING .00 .00 .00 .00 4149 CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00 4150 REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00 4151 PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00 4152 TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00 4153 AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00 4154 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 4155 FEMA STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00 4156 LOMA REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00 4157 DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00 4169 IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE .00 .00 .00 .00 4170 K-RAT STUDY FEES 1,480.00 .00 .00 1,480.00 0.0 4175 FAST TRACK PLANNING .00 .00 .00 .00 4180 FORMA FAST TRACK .00 .00 .00 .00 4200 IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS 10,045.00 960.00 7,150.00 2,895.00 71.2 4206 ANNEXATION FEES 710.00 .00 .00 710.00 0.0 4226 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT .00 .00 .00 .00 4260 ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY .00 .00 .00 .00 4261 LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE .00 .00 .00 .00 42-k' HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY .00 .00 .00 .00 LAND DIV UNIT MAP 748.00 .00 187.00 561.00 25.0 4- LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK .00 2,245.25 13,407.75 13,407.75-... PLANNING 198,585.00 16,389.00 137,188.45 61,396.55 69.1 A -ril 16, 1996 ,L ILF Note to Council Packet: City Attorney Peter Thorson was unable to review the entire Council packet this week, due to the very serious illness of a member of his immediate family. He asked me to advise you that he reviewed all of the pertinent legal matters with staff, prior to the preparation of the staff reports and feels comfortable they are in order from that standpoint. Ju@.@eek, CMC City Clerk