The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About020695 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 6, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on Monday, February 6, 1995, 6:00 P.M., at the Rancho California Water District's Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, California. Chairman Steve Ford called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford, Blair ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, City Attorney Peter Thorson, Assistant Planner Craig Ruiz and Associate Planner Saied Naaseh. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Slaven and seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the agenda. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford, Blair COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS: None 2. Approval of Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Slaven to approve the minutes of November 7, 1994, with the following corrections: Page 5 - Comment from Gail Hockster should read M.W.D. easement way Page 8 - Commissioner Webster's comment on item//8 reads Jefferson/Front Street or Jefferson/Sanborn? Commissioner Fahey withdrew the motion and Commissioner Slaven withdrew the second to approve the minutes. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Slaven to continue the approval of minutes of November 7, 1994, to the February 20, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. The motion carried as follows: Minutes.pc\020695 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1995 AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford, Blair COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS: None 3. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS PA94-0138, Revised Conditional Use Permit Assistant Planner Craig Ruiz presented the staff report detailing the applicants request for revision of existing use permit. Staff recommended approval. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:20 P.M. Robert Jackson, representative of the applicant Mr. Hill, spoke to request approval by the Commission. The Public Hearing was closed at 6:20 P.M. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Slaven to approve PA 94-0138, Revised Conditional Use Permit. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford, Blair COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONERS: None 4. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0180, 181, 183, 184. AND 185 Associate Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report on the proposed Johnson Ranch project. Staff presented the revised "Conditions of Approval" resulting from the meeting of December 9, 1994. Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant, spoke to the Commission to endorse the Johnson Ranch project based on the parkland dedication requirements. There has been a verbal agreement to enter into a proposal with the City of Temecula which includes the following: 1. Applicant will receive credit against the park component for the Development Impact Fee. 2. The fee credit granted to the applicant would be equal to 100% of the parks improvement in excess of the actual Quimby requirements for the 15 acre community park and the 3.6 acre village parks. 3. No credit will be granted for the 27 acre neighborhood parks or no Minutes.pc\020695 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1995 credit will be granted for improvements to Tucalota Creek, but a 7 acre credit will be given. 4. In the event the amount of the improvements exceed the park fee, the developer would assume that risk and no additional consideration would be granted by the City to compensate in excess of cost. 5. If the developer improves the parks for less than the overall park fee credits the developer would pay the balance of these additional park fees Two options for granting the park improvement credits would be as follows: 1. Option of $100,000 per acre credit for the 15 acre community park and the 3.6 acre village parks which amounts to 3.3 million dollars or 2. The developer would provide construction cost estimates for each of the park sites and those estimates would be subject to approval of the City. If the density of the over-all project is reduced to the mapping stages the parkland development actual dedication requirement would be reduced proportionately. She stated the Community Services Staff recommends approval of the Johnson Ranch project. Commissioner Fahey spoke with concern on the Anza Road requirement. Staff responded that this is a two-lane improvement from Borel Road along the eastern boundary connecting to "A" street and off site to Buck Road. Commissioner Webster requested an update of approved dwelling units for the specific plan in the sphere of influence. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:30 P.M. Jim Fergus, representative for Johnson Machinery, spoke to the Commission on the significant issues resolved with staff. He reported the applicant's position was that the Anza Road connection was not needed. Commissioner Webster requested clarification on the design guidelines pursuant to the proposed Development Code. Staff responded that a Condition of Approval addresses this concern. Staff also concurred that the zoning ordinance will reference the Development Code. Jim Gallanas, Project Manager for M.W.D., submitted a letter to the Minutes.pc\020695 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1995 Commission for the record, expressing concern for easements and right-of-way on the Johnson property. The Commission agreed that M.W.D. will be accommodated within the sub- division design, which is covered by "Conditions of Approval" Pete Cruzer, 32660 Priscilla Street, spoke in opposition to the project. Craig Haas, 39433 Colleen Way, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. David Robinson, spoke in opposition to the project. Bob Ulich, 11861 Lancewood Drive, Moreno Valley, spoke in opposition to the project. John Martian, 38675 Green Meadow Road, spoke in opposition to the project. John Martian, representing Monty Leismiester, 34653 Medera De Playa, Temecula, who is in opposition to the project. Carolyn Moore in proxy for Mr. & Mrs. Mike Phillips 39400 Calle Contento, Temecula, who are in opposition to the project. Adrian MacGregor, 34555 Madera De Playa, spoke in opposition to the project. Adrian MacGregor, as proxy for Dennis MacGregor, who is in opposition to the project. Phil Hoxie, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. June Maharin, 41460 Calle Contento, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. Robert Wheeler, representative for Lake Elsinore/Murrieta/Anza Conservation District, spoke in opposition to the project. Mike Nolton, 39130 Pala Vista Drive, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. Helen Lasagna, Nicolas Road, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. John Moramarco, 32720 Rancho California Road, spoke in opposition to Anza Road being included in the project. Chairman Ford called for a recess at 8:40 P.M. Minutes.pc\020695 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1995 The meeting of the Planning Commission was reconvened at 8:50 P.M., Chairman Ford presiding. The Public Hearing was re-opened. Maria Guerrero, 33325 Vino Way, spoke in opposition to the project. Carrie Jensen, 39615 Avienda Arizona, spoke in opposition to the project. Ken Barnes, 39695 Berenda Road, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project. Jim Fergus, representing Johnson Machinery Company, requested direction from the Commission in order to bring the questions to an end. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Fahey expressed difficulty in supporting the project due to concerns on the high density, maintaining a rural area, and trail connections to Lake Skinner. Commissioner Blair expressed concerns on the high density, the design not consistent with the surrounding area, drainage issues not resolved, and water and air quality. Commissioner Slaven commended the developer for the work accomplished thus far, however, she agrees with her fellow Commissioner's concerns on the high density and also the water flow from the dam. Commissioner Webster complimented the developer on a well thought-out plan. His concerns are for the design guidelines, open space area, buffers, and the Anza Road usability. Commissioner Ford expressed confusion as to the annexation areas. Commissioner Ford was concerned with the open space area and would like to see some workability to resolve these issues. He asked the applicant if he approved of the Commission taking a vote now or to continue the issue. Jim Fergus, representative for Johnson Machinery Company, respectfully requested a motion in order to take this issue to the City Council. Commissioner Slaven suggested a workshop or joint study session with the City Council. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Blair, to deny the Johnson Ranch project as it is proposed to the City Council. Chairman Ford called for Minutes.pc\020695 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6. 1995 discussion. Commissioner Slaven expressed the need for more time to resolve this issue. Commissioner Ford expressed a need for full discussion on fiscal impacts. Commissioner Blair recommended the lot size be increased to 7,200 square feet. Commissioner Webster would like more 1/2 acre to 5 acre lots in the project. Commissioner Ford asked Mr. Fergus' direction. The applicant stated he would like to resolve the concerns of the Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Blair to withdraw the previous motion to deny the Johnson Ranch project. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Blair to continue the item off calendar and work on the issues of concern, and reschedule a workshop meeting. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford, Blair NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Planning Director Thornhill will schedule and provide notice to all individuals interested as to the date of the workshop. NEXT MEETING February 27, 1995, 6:00 p.m., Rancho California Water District's Board Room, 42135 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Planning Director Gary Thornhill reported on the following: The February 27th Planning Commission meeting may be a joint meeting with City Council on the Development Code. This is by request of the Council. The 3rd week in March is scheduled for the Planning Institute. He asked if a Commissioner wishes to attend, to advise staff as soon as possible. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION Minutes.pc\020695 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1995 None. It was moved by Commissioner Slaven and seconded by Commissioner Fahey, the meeting be adjourned. l~~~,~~ "'k,,// /Chairman Steve Ford Minutes,pc\020695 7