The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About070291 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA TEMPORARY COMMUNITY CENTER- 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE JUL Y 2, 1991 - 7:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:30 - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 for the purpose of considering personnel matters and Section 54957.6 regarding labor negotiations, salary and fringe benefits Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 91-23 Resolution: No. 91-66 CALL TO ORDER: Invocation Pastor Peter Molster Church of Christ Flag Salute Councilmember Karel Lindemans ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC FORUM This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not listed on the agenda, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2/a0enda/O~ 1290 1 0~/27~1 CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 Cancellation of the Re(~ular City Council Meetinq of July 9. 1991 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the cancellation of the City Council meeting regularly scheduled for July 9, 1991. 4 Resolution Establishinq Disadvantaqed Business Enterorise (DBE) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) AND APPOINTING A DBE LIAISON OFFICER AND ESTABLISHING DBE GOALS 2/l~lnd~Oe12eO 2 Oe~7M1 Final Vestin(~ Tract No. 21821 (Subdivision located North of Via Norte and East of Calle Fiesta) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821, subject to the conditions of approval. 6 Award of Bid - Purchase of Breathing Truck RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Award the bid for purchase of one Breathing Support Truck for use by the City Fire Department to American Bristol Industries. 7 C. M. Aqreement Modification RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a revised letter of appointment for the City Manager. 8 General Plan Contract Ao!;)roval RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the contract with the Planning Center for preparation of the City's general plan program. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 2/eeenclWOe 1210 $ 06127/e I 9 Parcel MaD No. 21769. Amended No. 3. Second Extension of Time - Aooeal No. 2 (Property located on Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 9.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, AMENDED NO. 3 BASED ON THE ANAL YSlS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUSTAINING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE APPEAL OF REVISED PARCEL MAP NO. 21769 BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 10 Vesting Tentative Tract Mao No. 26861 (142 unit single family detached condominium development on 14.68 acres located on the south side of Highway 79 between Pala Road and Margarita Road.) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 10.2 Adopt the addendum to EIR No. 281 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26861 TO DEVELOP A 14. 68 ACRE PARCEL INTO 142 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS L OCA TED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 BETWEEN PALA AND MARGARITA ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 926- 016-925. 2,'~gende/Oe 12eO 4 08/27/~ ! 11 Costco - Zone Chanqe No. 11. Parcel Mao No. 26852. Plot Plan No. 224 (Continued from the meeting of June 25, 1991.) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for zone Change No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852, Plot Plan No. 224. 11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON 24 ACRES OF LAND FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO C-P-S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE NO. 11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON 24 ACRES OF LAND FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO C-P-S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE NO. 108. 11.3 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMCULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 11 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE NO. 108 11.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26852 TO SUBDIVIDE A 97.3 ACRE PARCEL INTO 13 PARCEL S AND TWO REMAINING PARCEL S L OCA TED A T THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS 2/Nende/0el 2~0 6 oe127/el 11.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOTPLAN NO. 224 TO CONSTRUCTA 149,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER ON 19.7 ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROAD COUNCIL BUSINESS 12 ReQuest for Funding - Miss Temecula 1991 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Consider request submitted by Miss Temecula 1991 for funding in the amount of $1,000. 13 Street Banner Program RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Consider the approval of the Street Banner Program and funding and direct Staff to implement the program and procure and install two pole assemblies at the recommended locations. 13.2 Adopt a Resolution to transfer $12,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance to Street Banners. 14 Air Traffic - French Valley Airoort (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mur3oz) 15 Reauest for Fundinq Temecula Museum Foundation Visitors' Center (Continued from the meeting of May 28, 1991) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 and Temecula Tourism and No large scale funding be provided to the Temecula Museum end Old Town Visitor's Center at this time; 2/NMM~Oe 12eO e 0el27/91 15.2 15.3 Funding that may be provided in either the short or long term be from redevelopment tax increment; Consideration for funding of the Temecula Museum and/or Visitor's Center be undertaken at the time all redevelopment projects are evaluated and prioritized in relation to each other by the Redevelopment Agency. 16 Revenues for Air Quality ManaQement Plan Implementation RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIl. OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECUI..A REGARDING MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION 17 City Council Policy - Police Services (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Lindemans CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: July 23, 1991, 7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California 21egemle/Oe 12~0 ? 08127~1 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETINO - fTo he held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President J. Sal Mufloz ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mur3oz PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Amendment to Contracts with California Landscaoe Maintenance and MacKensie Landscape RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 Approve an amendment to contract with California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. to provide continued landscape maintenance services for parks, slopes and medians through August 31, 1991. Approve amendment to contract with Mackensie Landscape to provide continued landscape maintenance services for TCSD slopes.through August 31, 1991. 2 Cancellation of The Regular MeetinQ of July 9. 1991. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Cancel the regular meeting scheduled July 9, 1991. DISTRICT BUSINESS 3 TCSD Caoital Imorovement Plan (CIP) for FY 1991-1992 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 1991-1992. 2/igendMOe 12e0 8 oe/27/e 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT BOARD OF D/RECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting Ju!y 23, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson Peg Moore presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Mur3oz, Parks Moore, PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENCY BUSINESS Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Cancellation of the Regular Meetin= of July 9. 1991 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Cancel the regular meeting scheduled July 9, 1991. EXECUTIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT A (;ENC Y MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting July 23, 1991, 8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California 2/NindM)e 12CO e Oe/2?tl I ,/~'~. ITEM NO. 1 ITEM NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLMMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of $346,111.13 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 2nd day of July, 1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 3/Resos 194 ,*'24/91 City of Temecuia Page: .seal Year: 1991 Check fiegister $~atio~: 9449 neck Date Veno~ ~me Invoice Date P/O Date l)e~ripti~ 051~191 ~-I LEA(~ OF CALIFORI/IA glTI£$ ........................... 051591 05129191 0512ql91 LATE REBIST;FEE;LCC;NOV. gO 75.00 0.00 75.00 007124 06113191 1~6LLORO0 I~LLO ROOS REOEVELOFI~Kr 61391 06/13/91 06/19/91 JUl 19 SEI~INAR)LD 55.00 0.00 55.00 Check Totals: 55,00 0.00 55.00 :)07125 06/14/91 CTYCL~ CITY CLEBK'S A__kxJOC_. OF CA - -- 61491 - 06/14/91 06/21/91REBISTRATION CI)F.JUNE 21 25.00 ........ 0.00 ........ 25.00- ....... check Totals: 25.00 0.00 25.00 ')07195 06t17t91-AVP-*- AVP VISION PLAN ........................ 61791 06/17/91 06/17/91 INSliP, AliCE PREMIUm; JUNE 91 397.80 0.00 S97.80 ....... Check Totals: - 397.80 --- 0,00 ........397;80 - - )07196 06117191 ~ 61791 06/17/91 06/17/911NIKIUINCE PREYIIU~; JUNE 91 10~3,~-.38 O. OO 10~322.38 Check Totals: 10~322.58 0.00 10J22.38 )07197 066/17/91 8(EAT 8.R.£.A.T. TRt~T 61791 06/17/91 06/17/911NRRANCE Pi~11Ltl JUI~ 91 420.00 0.00 --420.00 ...... ~07198 05101191 BENEFIT I)ENEFIT AI'ERICA 61791 05/01/91 Check Totals: 420.00 0.00 420.00 05/01/91 ~IT O{~S F~ ~Y 91 949.20 0.00 949.20 check Totals: )07199 06/17/91 $TATECOM STATE COI~°ENSATION INS. FUND 61791 06/17/91 06/17/9~ WO~S CO~.PYMT §/I-6/1 C~eck Totals: 06/18/91LUNCH~ST LUN~ & STUFF CATERINS 061891 06/18/91 0~/18/91 CATERING SERg. J~ 21,NW C/H 949.20 0.00 949.20 6,149.59 0.00 1149.39 1149.39 0.00 6~149,39 415.35 0,00 415.35 ,07201 06/18/9! I)EI~IT BENEFIT A~RICA 061891 06/18/91 C, eck Totals: 06/18/91 JUl REIMI).MEDICAL & DEP.CARE 415.35 0.00 415.35 4,214.97 0.00 1214.97 ,07202 06/18/911CMARETI ICMA RETIREMENT 061891 06/18/91 Check Totals: 051011911'IAY PAYI'Eh'T check Totals: 07D5 06/18/91 ~Tl()aL ~TIONAJ_ FEJ)L~ CARE 5¥$TENS 06~4 06118191 061181911~ F~qEHI~ F~ JULY 91 4~214.97 0.00 .... 4,214.97 ' 5,407.92 O. O0 5,407.92 5d07.92 0.00 5,407.92 46,t. O0 0,00 46,l. O0 Check Totals: '07204 06/18/91AI~.RCERT A~ICAN INSTITUTE OF 061891 06/18/9i 06/18/91 REGISTRATION; JULY 17-19 CONF 07~.~)5 06/18/91 POSTMAST POSTMASTER 61891 06/18/9i Check Totals: 0~/18/91BL~K ~IL;REC.BROCHURE;JU(~E 350.00 0.00 350.00 1,810.92 0.00 1,810.92 Cnec): Totals: 1.810.92 O. O0 1,810.92 07206 06120/9'.. DMV DEPAF~TMENT OF MDTt~ VgH.r?.i g_~ :./24191 :~cal Year: 1991 '.Thick .....Date V~ldor N~e Invoice Date P/O "~091 .... 06120191 XX)7213-O7tO2191-N. kIE])- -' AIJ. IE~- BP/~RICA~ 11488~-00 06106191 10221 City 04 Temecuia Check R~ister Date l)~ription 06/20/91 FEE F~ LI~ 1]iST;~ B Check Totals: 05/10/91 S&'ETY EQUIP 55.00 55.00 26.62 Page: Station: Discount 2 9449 0.00 26.62 ...... Check Totals: ...... 26.62 X)07214 07/02/91 A~ERICAN AliICAN BUSINE~ SYSTE)~ ~ 05/10/91 10~ 05101/91 APP!.I~TI~ F~ ~Ii.l) ~IT chKk Totals: .~<)7215 07/02/91 BIRDS/W.L PATRICIA BIRDeu/~LL ---06t'39P- - 06109191 ........ 06/09/91-NEI1~, LCC COI~, 6t%6/11 - -~0,45 -' 061391-1 0~/05/91 0~/05/91 I~I1~, CO~F, 6/5-6/6 29,75 0.00 0.00 0.00 3;~0,39 (Y.-00 ..... ~;45 ...... 0.00 29.75 ................... C~eck Totals: ............ ~)07216 07102/91 (]ENTRALP CENTRAL POINT SOFTWARE I~. 061791 06/17/91 1028~ 05/24/91 PC TOOLS check Totals: ~007217 07/02/91CITY/RV CITY DF I~]RF. NO V~)~Y 06t~9i---- 06/13t91 ..... 06/13/91 COiF.JULY ~;-P. Hc ....... check Totals: .8-07/02/91 ~VLtN - ~VLIN 89-2~:9~ 06/17/91 0068 181.05 181.05 07/12/g0 PLAN. COffilS$1DN MTG. 6/17/91 12.00 i15.00 0,00 .... 0,00 0,00 0,00 181.05 181.05 -- 1~00 .......... 12.00 115.00 ......... Check Totals: 007219 07/02/91FEI)EFLqLE FEDfi~ EXPRESS 433109487 05131191 05131191P~q(A6ES ~; 5/~i/91 Check Totals: 007220 07/02/91 ~Y FUNCXE~' ~TEB°R[SES 875440 06/17t9i 10279 05/24/91SOFTielRE 1t5.00 23.00 23.00 439.80 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 115.00 439.~ 007221-07/02/91 6LO!~L ilO~iO~ Check Totals: 8LOF~N. COeI~JTER SUPPLIES 0b/13/91 10280 04125/91 PAPuN I m LINE EXTANDER 439.80 356.07 0.00 0,00 ......................... Check Totals:- - ~007222 07/02/91 60VTFINO 809ERffiBG FIRo~CE OFFICERS A 0311404 06/10/91 10;~9 06/10/91 SUI)SCRP-SS~V.P, AY 9I-N~R 92 check Totals: )0()7~) 07/02/91 I~-2 I~F.R~qTIONAL ~ILI~ $YSTEH~ --061491 - .. 06/14/91 - -06/14/91 REPLENI~ POSTABE ffFR;JIJNE 91 Check Totals: ~00~4 07/02/91 .JFIXqVII)S J.F. OAVIDSON &_k'cJOC_AATES, INC. 317B6 04/01/91 04/01/91 F~F. SERV.~IL 9l;Pf~.~4 31785 0(/01/91 04/01/91 31784 04/01191 04t01/91 31783 04/01/91 04/01/91 31552 04/01/91 04/01/91 31551 ~/01/91 04/01/91 312-'~7 04/01/91 C~/01/91 ~12~ 04/01/91 0~/01/91 3,5~, 07 2,000.00 2,000.00 20,100.00 5,~.10 51,6J5.15 17,236.58 54,7~, 75 1i,~2.61 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 356,07 2,000.00 2,000.00 9,391.~ 20,100.00 5,4~.10 51,k5.15 17,236.50 5A,7~0.75 &~7.05 !1,252.61 2~/71 City o~ Temecuia :,cal Year: 1991 C~ec~ ~eg. ister Page: 5 Staticre: 9449 ~eck ~ Date Vendor Name Invoice Date P/O l)ate l)escri~tion 8-oss l)iK0unt I~t 31285 04101191 S1284 04101191 04/01/91 PROF.~r,~.JA~.--f'EIL91;PI~.t2 04/01/91 PROF.SE~.OAN. Hr~.91;P~.#! ............... Check-Totals: )07225 07/0219t JOl~l P. JOt~4 P. NEET, MA[ JLl~ 91 0~/17/91 0179 04/04/91APP~ISAL PPI~l-300-00~;JU~ ChK~ Totals: :~7226 07/02/91 KALLISTA KALLISTA, INC. 0~1391 .... 06113191 10281 05/24191KlWE~ 5-USER;SOFTWARE ..... Check Totals: ~)7~7-07/02/91-KUSTO~). KUST~ F./.ECTR~IgS, INC.- ......... l~d~10 06105191 1030:~ 05/24/91 RADAR ~OUNTING 31d~.32 0.00 216~497.96 ........ OA)O -- .216~97~6-- 2~000.00 0.00 2~000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2~000.00 305.00 0.00 305.00 .......... Check Totals: ........... 2&~8 ...... q).00 ---- 26~ -- )07228 07/02/91 LONGBCH LOl~16 ~ ~[F~ ~. [~. 741~ ~1~191 ~I 01/31/91 ~ ~~T ~~ ~.~ 0.~ -741~-1--- ~/~/91 10~ 05/~t91 DIE-~ F~-~-~ .... 4~.67 ........... 0.~ ...... 4~.67- Check Totals: )07229-07/02/91 I~KENZI MAO(ENZIE ~ 68)9 0~/31/91 0161 03113191 ~ SEINICES;MAY 91 ~/~1/91 0161 03/13/91 ~ ~I~S; ~Y 91 ~k Totals: ~72~ 07/02/91 ~I~IN ~IC KI~ ~UB ~[P ...... ~1791 - ~/17/91 ~/17/91 2 ~ ~IP 4~. 87 O. 00 475.87 49.67 O. 00 49.67 145.~5 0.00 145.~5 195.02 0.00 195.02 %.00 0.00 - %.O0 - )07231-07/02/91 ~ 5975 Check Totals: I~ ~INTING SE)NICES -- - 05/31/91 10302 0'5131191 JUNE NEWSLETTER 346.13 0.00 346.13 ...... Check Totals: ;~7232 07/02/91 NATIONAL NATIONAL LEASUE OF CITIES 061~91 06/13/91 06113191 ~ FEES; 6/91-6/92 Check Totals: 0072~ 07102/91 NELSON SHP/S{ NELSON ....... 0/~.91 04/24191 - 04124/91 i)07234 07/02/91 PROLDCK PRO LOC~ & KEY 2047-2XY5~ 05123191 10242 (Y5/23/91 REI~. C[)tF. 4124; EXPENSES .......... Check Totals: RE-KEY SNACK BAR/RESTRO0~S 275.00 0.00 275.00 275.00 O. O0 275. O0 17.15 -0.00 . -17.15 17.15 0.00 1% 15 t)072~5 07/02/91RAMTEK PO~ITEK ~ 05/07/91 01% 05/07/91 S659 05/07/91 01% 05/07/91 3660 0~/07/91 0196 05107191 3661 0§/07/91 0196 05/07/91 ~"<.~2 05/07/91 0196 05107191 7~.~ ~/07/91 0196 05/07/91 3664 05107191 0196 05107191 Check TotaLs: .... E/{~RG ST.REPAIR;APrIL 30,1991 EMER6 ST.REPAIR;APRIL 30~1991 EMERG ST. REPAIR;MAY 1,1~1 EME. RG ST.REPAIR;MAY i~1991 EI~ ST.REPAIR;MAY 2~1991 EI~ ST.REPAIR; MAY 2~1991 E~RB ST.REPAIR; MAY 3~ l~l 0.00 2,789.14 0.00 2~7~.14 349,19 0.00 349.19 2,808.~2 0.00 2~B08.42 305.66 0.00 305.~ 5,187.69 O.(X) ~,187.69 1~2S4.~2 0.00 ~2~.~2 2~775.70 0.00 2,775.70 C~eck Totals: 13:470.12 0.00 13~470.12 24/ql City of Temecula Page: 4 seal Year: 1991 Check fiegister Station: 9449 Date VenOor Name - - Invoice Date P/O Date Description 8ross Discount Net 5245 0~/14/91 10Lx?O 0~/11/71 6~VEL Ili°RINTI~ 16.19 - - O. OO' - -16.19 - - 526~ 06/14/91 10276 05/14/91 ~ PUITE FOR 6~Y T. 16.40 0.00 16.40 ................ Check Totals: ........... 32.59 ...... 0.00 32.59 - - )07237 07/02/91 REEIXI]RP REE!XI~ EN6INEERIN6 ~'~145 05/21/91 0193 05/15/91 ELECT. EN6. Ptt~E I;SPT PK;P~¥ 1,000.00 0.00 1:000.00 Check Totals: 1,000.OO 0.0~ 1,000. O0 )07238 07/02191 RIgE~SID RIVi~IDE OFFICE SUPPt. Y -9t~25-0 --.--(~10~tCll 10224 -0510bl91-OFFICES SUPPLIES ............... .."51.~ ......... 0~00 ..... 251.~ ..... Check Totals: )07239-07t02t91 ROBERT$--!~IA E. ROBERTS .............. 0~10~1 06/04/91 06/04/91 REI!~. MILEJlGE;CONF.6/4-6/5 251.~ 0.00 251.~ 83.6O 0.00 83.6O :)07240 07/02/91 $IN6LESO SINGLE ~ Sa°PLY 4623 06/0~/91 10226 05/17/91 241~ CART FOR CITY HALL Check Totals: )07241 07/02/91 SOCIal-1SOJTHF.~ ~ TELE. Pt.10~ CO Check-Totals: ................. 85.60 ........ 0.00 124.61 O. O0 124.61 124.61 0.00 124.61 $45--7418 *- 05t01191- - 05/01/91-CELLLiAR; MAY; 8.~, ........ 78.05 ...... Check Totals: 2 07102191 SUU. IV~ SUU. IYP~ PUB. ICATIO~ II~ 051~191 10218 05/09/91 CITY OF IEI~(1LA PimPS 78.05 849.59 849.59 - Check Totals: ')07243 07/02/91TE!~ILAT TEXECIJ~ TOM~ JLNE 05/01/91 0189 04/~/91 d~ 4 05/10/91 10215 ~/10/91 ~I~ ~ ~Y 17; ~Y 91 ~/0i/91 01~ ~/~/~1 849.59 O. O0 849.59 1, '~3.00 0.00 I~223.00 SO.00 0.® 50.00 ~37.00 0.00 ~7.00 C~eck Totals: ~07244 07102/91TOk~CTR TOk~ CENTER STATIONEES 4643-0 0~113/91 10274 05/14/91 OFFICE SU~IE$ 007245 07/02/91 VALLEY 10q18 Check Totals: VALLEY OFFICE PRODUCTS 0~/14/91 10261 05/15/91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,910.00 57.79 57.79 462,89 0.00 1~910.00 0.00 57.79 0.00 57.79 0.00 - - 462.89 Check Totals: ~)072~ 07/02/91 1~8TFdt~ kESTE~ RIVERSIDE CO[~IL O~12ql 06/0i/91 06101191 1990-1991 FlY ~ FEES 462.89 0.00 462.8q 9:620.2~ 0.00 9,620.~ Check Totals: 9,620.~ 0.~ %620.25 Report Totals: 282~919.5~ 0.00 2~919,~ ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~--~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI A AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager July 2, 1991 Cancellation of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 9, 1991 PREPARED BY: City Clerk June Greek RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council officially cancel the regularly scheduled meeting of July 9, 1991. DISCUSSION: Chapter 2.04 of the City's Municipal Code requires regular City Council meetings to be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Due to a League of California Cities meeting scheduled for July 9, 1991 which several Councilmembers plan to attend, it has become apparent that a quorum of the City Council will not be available on July 9, 1991. Council took action to scheduled this adjourned regular meeting to replace that date and should by minute action cancel the regular meeting. ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFF ICE~_~-~- CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA ACENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Department of Public Works July 2, 1991 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: Tim D. Setlet, Director of Public Works That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 91- establishing a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and appointing a DBE Liaison Officer and establishing DBE goals. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 established Federal policy concerning nondiscrimination in the use and administration of Federal Funds. This policy supports the fullest possible participation of firms owned and controlled by minorities and women in programs funded and administered by the U. S. Department of Transportation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) along with the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) is responsible for ensuring compliance with requirements for participation by disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE) when local agencies develop streets and roads projects using Federal Funds. The City of Temecula must formally adopt and implement a DBE Program and establish goals for participation by disadvantaged business enterprises before CALTRANS and FHWA will approve any requests for Federal Funds. The attached program has received preliminary approval from CALTRANS and establishes a DBE goal of 10%. The goal for participation by DBE's in development of local highway projects is established annually and is based upon the contracts anticipated to be awarded during the annual goal period. Fiscal Impact: The proposed goal of 10% is the minimum goal permitted by CALTRANS and is for the period from October 1, 1990 until September 30, 1991. The development of this program at this time will enable the City to obtain any Federal funds that may be applied for prior to September, 1991. After the Capital Improvement Program for FY 91-92 is adopted, a new goal will be established for the next annual reporting period ( 10/1/91-9/30/92 ). After the program has been formally adopted, CALTRANS will require that the goals be advertised and public comment received for thirty days. The public comment is for information only. Adoption and implementation of a DBE program will enable the City to meet the requirements of the United States Department of Transportation regarding Federal Funds for street and road projects. 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A DISADVANTAGE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM AND APPOINTING A DBE LIAISON OFFICER AND ESTABLISHING DBE GOALS WHEREAS, 49 CFR Part 23 heretofore requires a Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE) Program for recipients of Department of Transportation funds; and WHEREAS, the Federal Register states that all sub-recipients of Department of Transportation funds must prepare their own DBE Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula intends to be a sub-recipient of Department Transportation funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: 1. The City hereby adopts the DBE Program, which is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; 2. The Director of Public Works, Tim D. Setlet, is hereby appointed as the DBE Liaison Officer whose duties and responsibilities are defined in the DBE Program; 3. The following DBE goals are established for the period of October 1, 1990 to September 30, 1991: Disadvantage Business: 10% APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of . 1991. ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Ronald J. Parks Mayor of the City of Temecula Program DescFiDtion for CITY OF TEMECULA DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM (FHWA encourages the use of this standard 9rogram description in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations 49, Part 23, Section 23.45 and other related sections) Caltrans, Division of Local Streets and Roads, Rev. 9-17-87 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM CITY/%'~UN?Y' OF.. Temecu la Policy Statement It is the policy of the City of lemecula to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and firms as defined in 49CFR Part 23 in all aspects of contracting to the maximum extent feasible. This policy whi6h is fully described herein constitutes policy and commitment to substantially increase DBE Utilization in all program activities funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of Transportation model element. This Agency, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the recipients of Federal-aid funds, agree to ensure DBE firms have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts. In this regard, this Agency and all of its contractors and subcontractors will take all reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that DBE and firms have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor II. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Liaison Officer lim D. Setlet , Director of Public Works is the DBE Liaison Officer for this agency and shall report to the City Manager . He/She will be assigned such staff as is necessary to fully implement the provision of 49CFR Part 23 and such other DBE programs as may be required. The reporting structure and duties of support staff are shown on Attachment A . III. Duties of the DBE Liaison Officer The DBE Liaison Officer shall 4evelop, manage and implement the DBE Program on a day-to-day basis. Liaison Officer shall: The o Develop and carry out technical assistance programs for DBE's. Arrange solicitations, time for the presentation of bids, quantities, specifications, and delivery schedules so as,'to facilitate the participation of DBE's. Where such changes are found necessary to increase DBE utilization, they will be made in consultation and cooperation with the functional unit involved. -3- O Provide guidance to DBE's in overcoming barriers, such as inability to obtain bonding or financing. Carry out information and communication programs on contracting opportunities in a timely manner. Programs shall be bilingual where appropriate. Investigate the services offered by banks owned and controlled by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. o Unless noted elsewhere herein the listing of DBE's certified by Caltrans will be utilized. Said listing is to be made available to all project bidders. Such listing will include the following information: Name, address, telephone number, ethnic and/or sexual ownership, type of work performed by firm. o Prior to approval of the substitution of any DBE sub-contractor, the prime contractors will be required to prove performance of good faith efforts to replace the DBE with another eligible DBE. O Establish a DBE overall annual goal. The goal shall be evaluated annually and adjusted as necessary. - 4 - o Establish an appropriate individual project DBE goal for each Federal Aid Project advertised. o Perform good faith analysis when the project goal is not achieved. Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify performance of all activities included in this program. IV. Public Notification At the time of submittal of this program to the State Department of Transportation, a ~otice in both minority and majority local media will be published. Said publication shall include~ o The annual overall DBE goal. Notification that a description of how the goal was set is available ~or public inspection for a period of '30 days. Notification that both U.S. DOT and this agency will accept comments on the goal for 45 days from the date of the notice. The notice shall advise interested parties that comments are for information purposes only. This program will be reaffirmed by public notice annually at the time of publication of overall goal. If substantial changes are made to this document, the entire document shall be subject to notification noted in (1) above· In addition to the foregoing, interested disadvantaged and majority contractor organizations will receive direct mailings of this complete program. V. Establishment of Goal The DBE goal will be established'both annually (overall) and on a per contract basis. The overall goal will be based on planned contract activity for the coming year. The overall goal established will be subject to methodology and procedures established in 49CFR 23, Subparts (C) and (D) and take effect on October 1st of each year. o The overall DBE goal established with this initial program ~s l0 % and covers the period October 1, 1990 to September 30, 1991 . -6- Individual project goals will be established based on the following criteria= o Attainment of established overall goals. o Size of DroJect. o Opportunities for DBE's as subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers. o Minority population of geographic area in which work is to be performed. DBE goals being utilized in the geographic area by other State, Federal or local jurisdictions· o Availability of certified DBE's, Past experience on projects similar to the project being evaluated. o Such other factors as may effect the utilization of DBE's Complete evaluation documentation will be retained for each project· Projects which do not contain a specific goal will contain the following provisions: A. "Policy. It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement." B. DBE Obligation. (i) The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contacts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this agreement. In this regard, al'l recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted contracts." - R - VI. Contract Procedure This program shall be imolemented through the utilization of a contract special provision which will be provided/updated as necessary by Caltrans' Division of Local Streets and Roads. These procedures require bidders to submit the names of DBE subcontractors and suppliers, a description of the work each is to perform or material to be furnished, and the dollar value of each DBE subactivity. VII. DBE Notification Projects will be advertised in local newspapers and minority focus newspapers when possible. These ads will include reference to DBE requirements and will indicate the DBE project goal. DBE supportive service assistance centers will receive notification ofprojects scheduled to be advertised. Such Centers, will be afforded the opportunity to receive complimentary plans and specifications for projects within their geographical area of responsibility. VIII. Selection Criteria for Projects with DBE Goal Every p~oject containing a DBE goal shall be evaluated by the DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee to ascertain bidding contractors' efforts to attain the DBE goal. The award of any project must be concurred with by the DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee before said contract may be awarded. Should there be disagreement between functional units concerning contractors' efforts to attain contract goals for DBE participation, the matter shall be referred to the City Manager or his/~r- designee, for final determination. Competitors that fail to meet the DBE goal and fail to demonstrate sufficient reasonable good faith efforts shall be declared non-responsive and ineligible for award of the contract. All contracts that contain a DBE goal, pursuant to this policy, will be monitored on an ongoing basis by project personnel during the course of construction. The DBE Liaison Officer is to be immediately advised of any circumstances wherein contractor compliance with the DBE provision is questionable. The contractor shall submit a final report for each project which includes total · payments to the prime contractor as well as any payments - 10 - the prime contractor has made to DBE subcontractors, vendors and suppliers. If the report indicates the prime contractor has not achieved the project goal, project personnel shall attach an evaluation, in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to attain the goal and any corrective action that was taken. Prime contractors will be required to notify the Agency of any situation in which regularly scheduled progress payments are not made to DBE subcontractors, vendors or suppliers. IX. Set-Asides If determined necessary by the DBE Liaison Officer, DBE Set-Asides will be consider as a tool to achieve annual overall goals. X. Counting DBE Participants This Agency, its contractors, and subcontractors shall count DBE participation in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.47, Title 49, of the Code of Federal Regulations. -11- XI. Records and Reports The DBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records, and provide such reports, as are necessary to ensure full compliance with this policy. Such records and reports shall include, as a minimum, the following information: Awards to DBE's. Awards to majority contractors. Final project reports concerning DBE utilization. Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate compliance with this program. The DBE Liaison Officer shall submit reports to Caltrans and/or to the appropriate U.S. DOT element as required. These reports will includes o Number and dollar value of contracts awarded. o Number and dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded to DBE's. o Description of general categories of contracts awarded to DSE's. - 12 - o The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded during the year which were awarded to DBE's. o Indication as to the extent of which the percentage met or exceeded the overall goal. Reports shall be broken down separately by ethnic grouping. XII. Complaints Any complaints received by the Agency concerning this program will be investigated by lhe Permits 5nQineer . He/She will endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt by the DBE Liaison Officer. The appropriate DOT element and Calftans will be furnished a copy of the complaint and may be invited to participate in the investigation/resolution. The DOT element and Caltrans will receive'a complete investigative report on the complaint an4 may be requested to concur in the proposed disposition of said complaint. Contractors will be directed to notify the Agency of any complaints they may receive concerning this program. -13- Organization Chart ATTACHMENT Duties CITY MANAGER David F. Dixon ( NAME ) Insure that DBE Policy is imple- mented as adopted by City Council. Take appropriate action to resolve disagreement. LIAISON OFFICER lim D. $erlet ( NAME ) See'Section III of Policy. PERMITS ENGINEER Assist the Liaison Officer in insuring contractor compliance through receiving reports and taking interviews the making field observations and keeping records in daily diary of contract activities. ATTACHMENT B The City of Temecula has set the following annual goals for participation in projects receiving U.$. Dot Funds by DBE contractors for the period October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991. DBE: 10%. These goals are based on the following: Number and types of contracts to be awarded: Roadway Construction Roadway Maintenance Traffic Signal Construction Bridge Design Number and types of DBE contractors likely to be available to compete for contracts: Civil Engineering Design Surveying Right of Way Acquisition Traffic Studies Paving Contractors $oil/C;eotech Engineering. A~clbe ITEM NO. 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER'----- CITY MANAGER~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /J~J Engineering Department July 2. 1991 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821 PREPARED BY: Douglas M. Stewart RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821. subject to the conditions of approval. DISCUSSION: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 21821 was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on January 15, 1988. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 21818, Amended No. 1. was approved by the County Planning Commission on May 11, 1988 and the County Board of Supervisors on May 31. 1988. The first extension of time was approved on June 6, 1990. Vesting Tract Map No. 21821 contains 5 residential lots within 8.32 acres. The tract is located North of Via Norte and East of Calle Fiesta. The applicant is Bedford Properties. The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821: * Area Drainage Fees (Deferred to Building Permits) * Fire Mitigation Fees (Deferred to Building Permits) * Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees (Deferred to Building Permits) * Stephen's K-Rat (at Grading Permits) * Park Land Fees (Deferred to Building Permits) $8,511.38 2,000.00 750.00 16,224.00 5,827.50 Requirement of Quimby fees (Park Land Fees) is not listed as a County of Riverside Condition of Approval for Tract Map 21821. However, with the Approval of the First Extension of Time, the County Planning commission adopted Condition 24 requiring the implementation of Quimby Fees for this project pursuant to Ordinance 460. A:FVT21821 1 The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821: Faithful Labor and Performance Materials Streets and Drainage $ 42,000.00 $ 21,000.00 Water 14,500.00 7,500.00 Sewer -0- -0- Survey Monuments $ 3,500.00 FISCAL IMPACT: Not Determined. SUMMA RY: Staff Recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No. 21821. Amended No. 1. subject to the Conditions of approval. DS/BY:ks Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. Development Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Extension of Time Planning Commission Minutes and Amended Conditions dated June 6, 1990 Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report A:FVT21821 2 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Final Vestinq Tract Map No. 21821 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project, Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation ( Quimby ) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility (Traffic Signal Mitigation ) Public Facility (Library) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 23 (Planning) Condition No. 2q(b) (Planning) N/A Item No. 12 Road Department Letter dated 5/4/88 Condition No. 21(a) Fire Department Letter dated 3/lq/88 · Condition No. 14 A:FVT21821 MAp - V~'.ST IN~ SUBMll'I'AL TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: Riverside County Planning Department SUBMI*II'ALDATE: June 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Notice of Decision of Extension of Time request acted on by the Riverside County Planning Commission on June 6, 1990. RECOMMENDED MOTION: RECEIVE AND FILE the Notice of Decision of the case acted on by the Riverside County Planning Commission on June 6, 1990. The applicant of the following map has requested an Extension of Time to allow for recordation of the final map. The Riverside County Planning Commission APPROVED the Extension of Time and amended the Conditions of Approval for: VESTING TRACT MAP NO. 21821, AMENDED NO. 1 - Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - 5 Lots - 7.71 Acres - Northerly of Via Norte, easterly of Calle Fiesta - Schedule B - R-A-~ Zoning - Extension of Time to May 31, 1991. FIRST EXTENSION. "*"' ef De'P~~.yPla q iys, Chi nning Director PROJECT L(N~ATION: Northerly of Via Norte, easterly of Calle Fiesta in the City of Temecula BACKGROUND: RW: lgg 6/25/90 PLANNING COMMISSION: JUNE 6, 1990 Agenda Item: 1-4 RIVERSIDE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BOARD ROOM - 14th Floor - 4080 Lemon Street - Riverside PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR STAFF REPORT NOTE: The following will be presented to the Planning Commission as consent calendar item. Unless specifically requested by the applicant at the time of consideration, the item may not. be discussed and is subject to approval by the Commission under a single motion. CEQA: The following tract has conformed to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. It has been determined that the individual map will not have significant effects upon the environment. GENERAL PLAN: Unless otherwise noted, the following tract has been determined to be consistent with the general plan and its elements· ORDINANCE 659: It has been determined that in order to insure public health, safety and welfare, the map listed below will be subject to Ordinance 659, Development mitigation fee ~or residential development. ORDINANCE 663: The Conditions of Approval for the following map will be amended to reflect the implementation of Ordinance No. 663 (Stephens' Kangaroo Rat mitigation). The conditions will be amended as follows: Add Condition No. 23. ORDINANCE 460: The conditions of approval for the following map will be amended to reflect the implementation of Section 10,35 of Ordinance No. 460 (Park and Recreation Fees and Dedications), The 'conditions will be amended as follows: Add Condition No. 24. FINDINGS: There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, VESTING TRACT 21821 Consent Calendar Staff Report Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: The applicant of the following map has requested an extension of time to allow for recordation of the final map. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval, based upon the above listed findings. VESTING TRACT 21821, Amended No. 1 - Robert Bein - William Frost Associates - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - ~ L~t.~ 7.71 A(-re~ - G~,edule B R-A-l/2 Zor~e - EXlENSION OF TINE TNROUGN Nay 31, 1991 - First EXTENSION. RW:ts 05/07/90 Zontng Area: Rancho California Supervtsorlal District: Ftrst E.A. Number: 32272 Ragtonal Team No. One VESTII~TE!ITATIV~TRACTIIO. 21821 · ~ROEDR~P gO. 1 Planntng Commission: 5-4-88 Agenda Item No. 4-5 RIVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ~ Applicant: Engineer/Rap: 3. Type of Request: 4. Location: $. Extsttng Zontng: 6. Surrounding Zoning: 7. Stte Characteristics: 8. Area Characteristics: g. Comprehensive General Plan Oestgnatton: 10. Land 01vtston Data: 11. Agency Recoreendattons: Katser Development Rancho Pactftc Engineering Subdivide 7.71 acres tnto $ stngle famtly residential lots Northerly of Vta Notre, easterly of Calla Ftesta R-A-~ R-A-~, R-Ro R-R-2~ and R-T Subject stte is currently vacant wtth dry grass and scrub brush covertng the slte Large lot single lastly residential and vacant land Land Use: Category III Denstty: 0.2 to 2.0 DU per acre Total Acreage: 7.71 Total Lots: 5 Proposed Min. Lot Size: 21,780 square feet See Letter Oated: Road: S-t~-88- 5-04-88 (As per ~.C, on 5-4-8 Health: 4-04-88 Flood: 3-15-88 Fire: 3-14-88 Oldg. & Safety: 3-15-B§ Mt. Paloffer: 1-1S-88 12. Letters: Opposing/Supporting: None as of this writing 13. Sphere of Intquence: Not within & city sphere ANALYSIS: Project Description: "Vesting" Tentative Tract No. 21821, Mended No. I is m ' - Schedule B · suMivlston in the Rancho Cmltforntm zontng mrem proposing to subdivide 7.71 acres into S slngle fmtly residential lots, with e mtntmum lot size of 21,780 square feet. The project ts located northerly of Via Norte and easterly of Cmlle Fiesta. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 AJ~ENDED NO. 1 Staff Report Page 2 Land Use and Zontnq: The subject stte ts currently vacant. Surrounding land uses are large lot single family residential homes and vacant land. The property is zoned R-A-b as are adjacent properties to the northwest, wmst, south, and southeast. The roperttes to the north of the subject site are zoned R-R and R-R-2~o R-T and -R zontng exist to the northeast. The proposed large lot single family residential development is compatible with stmtlar existing and approved subdivisions adjacent to the subject property. Oest~n Considerations: The proposed subdivision has been destgned in accordance with the standards of the R-A-~ (Residential-Agriculture with a b acre minimum lot size) zone. The circulation pattern uses Calla Fiesta as the primary access for Lots 1-4. Proposed Parcel No. 5 ts obtaining access off of Via Norte. Oue to the tracts 'vesting ' status a development design ~anual was submitted. The design manual was found to be adequate and will be implemented through the conditions of approval. Comprehensive General Plan Consistency: The Comprehensive General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element shows this stt~ in 'Areas Not Designated as Open Space.'-The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive General Plan shows the site in the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area, the Rancho Californta/Temecula Subarea, and the Hount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting area. The policies of the Rancho Caltfornta/Temecula subarea state that 'future land uses within this area should generally be Category I and Category 1% land uses, with the outer portions of the area being Category %If. Category %%I land uses include residential developments with a butldln~ intensity of one dwelling unit per half acre to one dwelling unit per five acres, and requires adequate access and co~m~unlty wmter, compatibility with existing arm development and a rural and mll town identity. Currently, the existing land uses in the area fit the Category III requirements. This proposal can adequately be classified as a Category Ill project due to the availability of wmter and sewer services available to the site, adequate access and compatibility with area. The County Envtronmentml Health Department has a written sLatmerit from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to thts subdivision. VESTIIqG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 ~qENDED NO. l Staff Report Page 3 Environmental Assessment: The tnlttal study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 32272 Indicated a loss of local Important farmland, destruction of Stephens' Kangaroo Rat habttat and that the stte ts wtthtn the planntng equestrian trails. The site ts wtthtn the 14ount Palomar Special 11ghttng area, and the Temecula Unton School 01strtct uhtch ts tmpacted by overcr~Jtng. Additionally, the tntttal study 1denttries 11bra~y services as betng tmpacted by residential developments. The subject stte ts surrounded by large lot residential developments and therefore not conducive to far~tng and 1as development wt]1 not have an tmpact on the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat habttat. Thts proposal ts Incorporating rtdtng and htktng equestrian tratls tnto the destgn of the project. Potentta~ tmpacts upon the Hount Palomar Observatory can be mitigated through conformance wtth · the conditions of approval and the Comprehensive General P]an's I~ount .Palomar Spectal Ltghttng Area policies. 14trigetlon of tmpacts to the area's schools and 11brar~ wtll be accomplished through the payment of mitigation fees prior to the tssuance of butldtng permtts. Wtth the Implementation of the above referenced mitigation, tt has been determined that the proposed project wtll not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a negattve declaration has been prepared. A Ftscal Impact Report was prepared for thts project and submitted to the County Administrative Offtce. The Administrative Offtce has revtewed the Fiscal impact Report and has determined that, based upon a selltn9 prtce of $230,000.00, the proposed project vr111 provtde the County $2,192.00 at butldout and $927.00 annually after buildout. 1. 'Vesting' Tentative Tract No. 21821 ts a R-Ao~ subdivision of 7.71 acres tn the Rancho California area tnto 5 residential lots. 2. The subject stte ts vacant and zoned R-A-b. 3. Surrounding zoning ts primarily R-A?~ R-R zontng extsts to the north, .orthfist, #st and southlilt with R-T ind R*R-2b to the north end northeast of subject stte. 4. Large lot stngle fimtly residential homes and vacant land are the primary land uses surrounding the stte. Revte~ of the pollctes of the Land Use Elements In the Comprehensive General Plan Indicates that the subject property meets the requirements of Category III at thts ttme. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 AMENDEO NO. 1 Staff Report Page 4 6. The tnttta1 study for Environmental Assessment No. 32272 has indicated the% the project wtll ~reat~ no aigntf~¢ant adverse tmpact upon the environment. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal ts consistent kith Ordinance No. 348 and 460. 2. The proposal ts consistent wtth the provisions of the Comprehensive General Plan. 3. The proposal is compatible kith area development. 4. Potential environmental tapacts wtll he mitigated through adherence to the conditions of approval. RELATIONS: Based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated in this staff report, Staff recon~nends: AUUPIIUN of Lhe .eg&tlve declaratlo. for Lnvlro.,mntal Assessf~m.L No. 3Z2)~ based upon the findings Incorporated tn the inttlal study, and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environcent; and, APPROVAL of VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 subject to the attached condJtlons of approval. 4/18/88 YI'R ?.1821 il t.~#O USE VA .I,i VAC VAC VAC VAC RiVER3iDE CC 11CY PLAnnine DEPARCl;IEn DATE: AUGUST 18, 1988 RE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 21821 E. A. NIMBER: 32272 REGIONAL TEAM NO. 1 Dear Applicant: The Riverside County Board of ~upervisors has taken the follc~ving action on the above referenced tentative tract map at its regular meeting of MAY 31, 1988 XX APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions. ~ DENIED tentative map based on attached findings. APPROVED withdrawal of tentative map. The tract map has been found to be consistent with all pertinent elements of the Riverside County General Plan and is in compliance with the California Environmental Q~ality Act of 1970. t[h-e pruj~ct will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declara.~ion has ~,_..~.dopted. A conditionally appro~'ed tentat{~-~ract map shall expire _l-?/t--months after the approval a~--~ the Board of Supervisors. Hear-~g.._t,h~..-date-o~--wh~J~-i$-~row~ab~, unless within tha period of time a fina).~ra,p. shall ~(a~.v~. been approved and f~le~)vith the County Recorder. Prior to the expiration da~e,'-~lie',l~hU-Rljv(d(~'(~l~y/'a)l~pl~ j~'~'~rij~_lng for an extension of time. Application shall'i, l~ej.~a<f~-the Planning Oi.!~,qt. or..'ijthiYt5, (30) days prior to the expiration date of the ten{~t.."~a'p~:~'; ]~qr IB~'~ .~(~/~j).~,y,ts~',~'=pa'y extend the period for one y~ar and upon further ap'p~ion a scsond and a third year," RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director Richard.'~. MacHott - Supervising Planner FILE - WHITE APPLICANT - CANARY ENGINEER - PINK 295-39 (l~v. t0/el) 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787'6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 9220' (~1 q) SUBMrI-['AL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVI:~ORS COUNTY OF rIvErsiDE. sTATE OF cauFOrNla l:rom: The Planning Department $UBMIrrALDATE: i~ SUBJECT: VFSTING T.E_NT_A_T_IyE TRACT_N_O. 21821 - Kaiser Development Co. First Supervisorial District - Rancho C~lifornia Area - 7.71 Acres 5 Lots - Schedule B - R-A-~ Zoning RECOmmENDED MOTION: RECEIVE AND FILE the above mentioned case acted on by the Planning Commission on May )l, 1988. ADOPTED the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No..32272 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 subject to the attached conditions and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated May 11, 1988. GM: sc RogerS. Streeter, Planning Director MINUTES OF Till: !1OARD OF SUPERVISOIIS On motion of Supervisor Younglove, seconded by Supervisor Larson and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the above report of approval is received and filed as recommended. Aye s: Noes: None Absent: None Date: M~y 31, 1988 Xc: Plan~ing, Land Use, Applicant Depts. Comments Dunlap, Ceniceros, Larson, Younglove and Abraham Gerald A. Maloney Clerk of the Board Deputy Dist. AGENDA NO. 1 1.5 DATE MAY 31, 1988 :liV;:l iD; tourIcy PLAnnin(; TO: Surveyor Road Building & Safety Flood Control Health Fire Protection RE: VESTIIIG TENTATIVE TRACT/Xl)V~OL~XMAP NO. 21821 REGIONAL TEAM NO. 1 The Riverside County[]] Planning Director/~-~iBoard of Supervisors has taken the following action on the above referenced tentative map: XX APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no waiver request submitted). DENIED tentative map based on the attached findings. APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver of the final map. APPROVED tentative map and APPROVED request for waiver of the final map. APPROVED ~ Extension of Time to ~ a l i p,'uv i6~ly approved..'c..on.d i,t'i.ons. ) t -~!,' AI'I'RUVLU ', ExLensiuu ut lime to "~.' --all previously approve.d_..conditiOllS and the attached addit~na'l conditions. : · ' " ,.: '1~' ~'~i' \''~' ~ ' .,'L"', , 2. ° ' . ,' -~:- '., ~ '" ' , ~ , .. . . :.,'. .~.. DENIED Extension of T-ime,~'.'~ '-:'.-'..-' ,.i .. ;;...:'.-:.... - ~'...- ~-" " I,' I !'/'.'.~,' I i) ~'. :, ~ .. ,.,, __ APPROVED withdrawal of ~ke~n~tat]ve--map.:-- APPROVED Minor Change to rel~'is.e,'originally approved conditions as shown (attached). APPROVED Minor Change to revise originally approved map (attached). subject to.~ subject to DENIED request for Minor Change. ~APPROVED Minor Change to waive the final map. RjM:sc ' Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director RichardS. MacHott - Supervising Planner SURVEYOR - WHITE ROAD - BLUE ,s-27 (~,v. ~o/s]) HEALTH - PINK BUILDING & SAFETY - GREEN FIRE PROTECTION - GOLDENROD FLOOD - CANARY 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 · RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821 DATE: AMENDED NO. I EXPIRES: SIANUARU CUNUIIIUNS The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 21821, which action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule B, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivi~on Map Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. VI~-IlPlG TEXTATEVE TRACT RO. 21821 Conditions of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. A grading petit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to con~nencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the - final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recoe~nendations · outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 5-O¢-BB, a copy of which is attached. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. All r~ad easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the I~ad Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions act forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 4-04-88, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 3-15-88, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section X0.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the I~ad Commissioner. The subdivider shall co~ply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire l~rshal's letter dated 3-14-BB, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the I~ilding and Safety letter dated 3-15-88, a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed comnon open space area improvement phasint, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Dep~rtment approval. A~y proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. VESTING TEffTATIVE TRACT I10. 21821 ~d. ~1 Conditions of Approve] Page 3 18. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a. All lots shall have a minimum size of 21,780 square feet. b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance 460. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. d. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-A-~ zone, .Co When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: a.. Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Oepartment that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Oepartment County Planning Department Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall apply for annexation of the subject property, as divided, into the Meadowview Property Owners Association and shall provide evidence to the Planning Oepertment of the approval or rejection of said application for annexation. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Oirector. VE31'IM6 ll)ITATIVE TI~ I10. ~1821 ~d. fl Conditions of Approval Page 4 Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints-~' Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'This property is located within thirty (30) miles of ~unt Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall be shielded and oriented so as not to shine above the horizontal plane passing through the luminare. Outdoor lighting for roadways, walkwmys, equi~ent yards, parking lots, security, and other similar applications shall be from low pressure sodium vapor lighting systems. All other outdoor lighting that is not from low pressure sodium vapor lighting systems shall be turned off at %1:00 p.m. or earlier. 20. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERHITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: PP~e~ ~e ~he ~ssulnee eY grading ~s de~a~3ed 3andseap~ng and ~e~ ~he phase e~ deve~epmen~ ~ ~eeess~ ~he p3aRs she33 be ee~4~aed by e 3endsripe i~ki~e(~ and sk4~ pFev~de ~e~ ~ke Leadsempe eereeM4ng ~e~e Fequa~ed eha~ be deeigMed ee be epaque up 4e · maaamum #e.(gk~ o4 eaK (S~ ~e~ at A~ u,434,y seq, vaee ePeae end ene3eev~es she33 be ee~eened ¢Pem be p~eeed uadea,'g~ouMd, 4~ g~ev~d eeveP~ ekrvbs dnd epfia~ 4;ess 4, een~uMetaen wa*k meaade~4Mg eadewa~ks, beauhas and e~he~ pedefi~aaa amea4eaes wheme VE~TII~ TEHTATIVE TRAET 10. 11821 Conditiofis of Approval Page 5 b~ de wagk~-e~-way, (hey ekaS~ be ~4gh(-e~-way, t#e sub,eat pFepe~y s#a~ be shown on the p?o~ee~s g?adan! p3ans and eke33 nee, Chose eo be ~e~oved, ~e3oefied and~e~ ~etaaned. g. A3~ ,?see sheSS be ~ni~m deub~e flaked. Weake? end~e? eSew g;ewa,~ erees ekeS3 be s&eeS e~aked, (Deleted per Planning Convnission on May 11. 19BS). e~ peet and beam ~evndat~ons e~ tke app?ep~aate eomb~nfi~en e~ epSat 3eve~ Wads and pest and beam ~o,ada~aens ~hen de~e~epmen~ 4s p~epeeed her~enta3 d4s~a.ee e~ tk4r~y ~3g~ ~ee~, (Deleted per Planning Commission on May 11, 1988). If the project is to be phased. prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1. Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which amy be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through ~rch 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase Oriveways shall be designed'so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade. YE:S'F%I~ TEXTATIYE T~AL'T MO. Z1821 Am~. ~1 Co'nditions of Approval Page 6 e. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be ~rotected in the siting of individual building pads on final grading pJans. Grading plans shall incorporate the grading of equestrian trails so that all equestrian trails are graded to a finish~ grade that is reasonable for their use for equestrian purposes. (Added per Planning Commission on Hay 11, lg88) Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library development. bo Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. 4P~a~aeM,(Deleted per Planning Commission on ~y 11,198B). Prior to the issuance of building permits, a plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department pursuant to Section 1B.30 of Ordinance No. 348 accompanied by all applicable filing fees, as a plot plan that is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act and is not transmitted to any governmental agency other than the Riverside County Planning Department. The plot plan shall ensure the conformance of the final site development with the. tr&ct's approved Design ~nual (Exhibit H), and shall contain the following elements: A ftnal site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all setbacks, and floor plan and elevation assignments to individual lots. One (1) color and materials sample board (maximum size of B X 13 inches ~y 3/8 inch thick) containing precise color, textu~ and material swatches or photographs (which may be from suppliers' brochures~ Indicate on the board the name, address and phone numbers ) both the sample board preparer and the project a~plicant, tract.nomber, and the manufacturer and product numbers where possible (trade names also acceptable). VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT R0. 21821 Aid. Conditions of Approval Page 7 One (1) copy of the architectural elevations colored to represent the selected color combinations, with symbols keyed to the color and materials board. The written color and material descriptions shall be located on the elevation. Six (6) copies of each of glossy photographic color prints (size 8 X 10 inches) of both color and materials board and colored architectural elevations for permanent filin:, hear'~ng body review and agency distribution. All writing ~st b~ legible. Said plot plan shall require the approval of the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any building permits for lots included within the plot plan. The submittal of plot plans prior to the issuance of building permits may be phased provided: A separate plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Oepartment for each phase, which shall be accompanied by appropriate filing fees. e Each individual plot plan shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits for lots included within that plot plan. be sa~4s~4ed, al approved p~ans ~e~ (e ~ke ~ss~a~e e~ eee~paney pe~s, Planning Co~nission on Play ~1,1988). ~:~c 4/18/88 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21821Amd. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 23. 24. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County Ordinance or resolution. (Added at Planning Commission on June 6, 1990). Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following conditions shall be complied with: a o The subdivider shall annex Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 21821 into County Service Area 143. (Added at Planning Commission on June 6, 1990). The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with the County Service Area 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the recordation of the final map. (Added at Planning Commission on June 5, 1990). RW:t$ 05/07/90 liemere/- DATE STAMP RiVER:)iDE c ouncY PL, nninG DEPARQiIEnC REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Please complete two {2) copies of this application form. The appropriate fee to process this request is listed on the current fee schedule. All approvals of time extensions must be consistent with the pertinent elements of the Riverside County General Plan, and must conform to either the currently applicable schedule of improvements specified by the Riverside County Land Division Ordinance for land divisions, or the Riverside County Land Use Ordinance for Variances, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits. CASE NO: Tract/!)qK~(aW(X Map 21821 Vat/CUP/PUP ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO{s) 919-230-002 EXTENSION REQUEST: First XX Second Third NOTE: Only Land Divisions may obtain a second or third extension of time. Applicant's Name Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoiates _~d~iling Address 28765 Single Oak Dr., Suite 250 Temecula, C_A 923~p .? Phone (714) 676-8042 Signature ~,'~, ~:,.~ ~', ' ~/71~_. ,_ ..,a~. - ~ ~p~_ _(~t/~_.~a', Owner' s 'Name Mesa Homes Mailing Address 28765 Single Oak Dr,, Suite 100 Signature j~~r~. ' ~ ' ' OFFICE USE ONLY Supervisorial District Zoning District/Area Initial Approval First Extension to Second Extension to Third Extension to Phone ,~7~4) 676-72gL1. Hearing Dates: Planning Con~ission Board of Supervisors Request Denied Approved Approved Approved '~J 85-37 4080 LEMON STREET, 9~' FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 (714) 787-8181 46-209 OASIS SIREEl'. ROOM 30~ INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9220~ (6191 342-8277 LeRoy D. Smoot lOAD CO~n~t$$~ON~R · COUNfV SulvEvol OFFICE OF ROAD CO.~I*41SSIO*,ER ~. COL'.%'TY 5L R~'E¥'OR Hay 4, 1988 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 9250! Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Tract Map 21821 - Amend #1 Schedule B - Team 1 Amended at Planning Con~tssion 5-4-88 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance.460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It ts understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Co~issioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by buLh. All dralf~age easef:~enLs shall be sho~ on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage ¢1owtng onto or through the site. ~n the event the Road Commissioner pemlts the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article X! of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the sunirider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department,. Tract Map 21821 - Amend #1 · I~-rPr-19~ May 4, 1988 Page.~. Amenaea at Planning Con~ntssJon 5-4-88 e ® 10. 11. 12. 13. Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. "A" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/50'). The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from R.C.W.D. prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%. Calle Fiesta shall be improved with asphalt concrete dikes located 16 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Con~ntssioner within a 25 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. Via Norte shall be improved with asphalt concrete dikes located 27 feet frnm renterline and n~tch ~p ~fphalt cu,c~ete p~vl,g~ . reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 33 foot half widt~ dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section B. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of Issuance of a building permit. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Con~nissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. T-act nap' 21821 - Amend #1 44ee, c,h-~q-'-z-g~8 May 4. 1988 Page 3 ' Amended at Planning Commission 5-4-88 14. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461. Standard 817. 15. Asphalttc enulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall h~ allplied at a rate ~)[ U.U~ gall(m per square yard. Asptlalt emulsion shall conform, to S~ctluns 32. 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. 16. A standard offset cul-de-sacs shall be constructed within the landdivision. 17. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. 18. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control. sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 19. All centerline intersections shall be at gO° with a minimum 50' tangent measured from flow line. 20. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with TR 3883. 22. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. Very truly yours, · , /.. Gus Hug Road Otvtston Engineer GH:lh · 21. Street 1tghts shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 46! at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with Governmental Code Section ~5~0.! COUNTY oFRIVERSIDE _ DEPARTMENT of HEALTH ' ~"'~ , ..... 4080 Lemon Street ~~ PLANNING DEPARTk.'~NT A~N: Olori~ Hac~el -. ill ca~f, u.I. I[S,~T f lmr C'~ll el' iE&L/M deimmITIMT~l · RE; TRACT HAP 21821: Bezng a Division of Lot 546 of Tract 3853 as recorded In Book 62, Page 17 of Haps, on File in the Office of the County Recorder. Riverside California (5 Lots) IlSLiSt NIlMI. ~ O~VOAJ dUOdO. C.~ 0~301 Lie! ILIIItCl L,t~EILieNOEK. G&.SZEOO Gent lemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map Tract Hap 2182! as recommends that: A water system shall be 3nstalled according to plans and specifications as approved by the vater company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet. along with the orlglna! dravlng to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the ln~ernal pipe diameter. locatlon of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications. and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to..the~'existlng system. The plans shal! comply in all respects with Div. S, Part I, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code. California Administrative Code. Title 25. Chapter 16. and Genera! Order No. 103 of the ~ubllc Utilities Commission of the State of California when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company wlth the following certification: "! certify that the design of the water system in Tract Hap No. 21821 is In accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California ~ater District and that the water service. storage and distribution system viii be adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific Riverside County Planning Commission Page Two AT'L'N: Gloria Maciel April 4. 1988 quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose." This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. _~__~_~lans must be submitted to the Count¥_~£X~X~£i!_Qffice to review at [gqordation of the final ~. This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand. providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department will permit domestic sewage disposal from the individual lots in this subdivision as per a percolatlon report submitted by Leighton and Associates dated. March 2. 1988 (Addendum March 22. 1988) for each 100 oallons of septic tank capacity as follows: PERCOLATION LOT RATE (MIN. ~Q= /INCM) 1 4.4 2 4~.0 3 60.0 4 12.0 5 7.5 *NOTE: APPLICATION RATE (SOlF'TI100 GAL /DAY) SQ./FT./OF LEACHING AREA REOUIRED (INCLUDES 100% EXPANSION). 20 480 100 2400 120 2680 30 720 20 480 The reserved areas shown on the Geotechnical Map are based on a ~200 gallon septic tank using appropriate trench wail separations. Riverside County Planning Page Three ATTN: Gloria Maclel April ll, 1988 The above information is an indication of the type of sewaoe dl~po~a! ~y%tem~ based on ~xl~tl~O uluUl~d elevatlul~§ at time the tests were conducted. If any grading compaction. cutting. etc., is accomplished and is in excess of two feet. additional sewage disposal information shall be required prior to finaling of the map. It 1s our opinion that extensive grading is aolna to be necessary for this subdivision. Prior to recordation of the final map. we will require an evaluation and update preliminary grading map by the soils engineer of record. Additional testing is to be performed to incorporate system designs for each !9~ incorporating all the recommendations/conclusions listed in the soils report referenced above. A copy of the revised grading map signed by the soils engineer shall be provided orior to recordation of the final map, indicating areas of intended subsurface sewage disposal placement to include 100~ expansion area. This Department will permit domestic sewage disposal from the individual lots in this subdivision by means of sept:c tanks vlth minimum size leaching lines or seepage pits based on the occupancy of each individual 1~% ~here shali be an unoccupied area on each lot where sewaoe disposal as required above, may be installed in conformance with the current Uniform Plumbing CoHe. There shall be an addl~iona'l unoccupied area equal to 100% expansion of the above required sewaoe disposal systems for sewage disposal installation in case of failure. However, it should be noted that this type of sewage disposal system is considered temporary and if sewer lines of a sewer district become available, connection to the system should be made. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. S' ncerelv. 'Sam Marti Sanitarian Environmental Health Services HRL:SM:tac KICN NILrT ,1:4 I..'m'DWARDS Yet IrPNONI~ (714! RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIywRelD~, ~AI. IIrOI~NIA ~,~10~' Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. ~__ Area!,_~7/,~T~. ~,,~'7'f/.,~:~' We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses. which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." This project is in the drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea and regulations. The proposed zoning ts consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The Otstrtct's report dated Zo ~J-x~ is sttll current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. The attached comments apply. Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EDWARDS 1~' ~n inee~Fine~ 1 enior Civi~ Engineer DATE: KI~NNETR' I..'EDWA AI~S Cl41 lltr INIINI! I'N RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WIV[RIIC)I[. CAL. IFORNIA IZ80~ February 26, 1988 ,ill lIARKIT ITNK~T F). O, BOX IO55 TEL-IF)NONE (714) Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. 1 Gloria Maciel Ladies and Gentlemen= Vesting Traot 21821 This is a proposal to divide 8 acres into 5 lots in the Santa Gertrudis Valley area, east of Calle Fiesta and north of Via Norte. The topography of the site consists of well defined ridges and watercourses that traverse the property. Very little offsite storm runoff is tributary to the project. Special care must be exercised in the development of Lots 1-q. Following are the District's recommendations: This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans", amended July 3, 198q: ae Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner as part of the filing for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording' a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map; or be At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting defermerit of the payment of fees, the drainage fees shall be paid to the Building Director at the time of issuance of a grad- ing permit or building permit for each approved par- cel, whichever may be first obtained after the recording of the subdivision final map or parcel map; however, · Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 21821 -2- February 17, 1988 Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner as a part of the filing for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map, or before receiving a waiver to record a land division, for each lot within the land division where construction activity as evi- denced by one of the following actions has occurred since May 26, 1981: (a) A grading permit or building permit has been obtained. (b) Grading or structures have been initiated. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans (for Lots 1-4) and final map should be submitted to the District via tile Road Uepartment for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. A regis- tered engineer must sign, seal and note his expirat£on date on plans and calculations submitted. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Stuart McKibbin of this office at 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, co: 1) · 2) KENNETH L. EDWARDS HN H. KASHUBA nior Civil Engineer Rancho Pacific Engineering Eatset Development Co. SEM:bab ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEAM I TR 21821-- AMEND£D RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN C~)OPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPAFITMENT OF FOFIESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE CIIIEF 3-14-88 16 1985 RtVF..RSIDE CouNTY pLANNiNG DEPARTMENT P[anninl & Enlineerlnl Office 4080 Lemon ${reet. Suite t I Riverside. CA 92501 (7141 787.6606 With respect to the conditions of approval'for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided An accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards= FIRE PROTECTION Schedule #B" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2½") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 660 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 330 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clexk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots create~ by this land division shall c~m~ly with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall have a Class #B" rating and shall be approved by the FAre Department prior to installation. ' ''Subject.- TR 21821 Page MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. of P19nrlino DePartment Gloria Maciel Building and Safety, Land Use Division TR 21821 - Vesting, Amend #1 March 15. 1988 Acc'z ,zD i233 Land Use has the following comments: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Grading has the attached comments. Land Use Division ~A~r~, Februa]-y 11. 198B ~!io~w~,_Eric Traboulay, Deputy Director, Gradinq m~t, LI)C Roview of Vestinq Maps The Grading Division will not be reviewing precise grading plans for vesting maps prior to Planning Department approval. Grading requirements and recommendations will be addressed during application for grading review and permit. Any modi- fications required of grading plans submitted to the Planning .Department for vesting purposes will be subject to Planning Department.review and a~proval. 'Piease.incorporate this policy into your comments and cor- :~espondence on vesting maps at Land Development Committee .Meetings'· ':"' JB/jp ee · T~r~ cop!~ ~f the. or~dlng Plan ¢~-$¢a1~> conFo~mln~ [0 Ch.' "er 7~ o¢ the Unif.:,r~', ~uil ng Co~e anO Ordinance ~57.6~ shall be submitteo to th~s Department for revie~ and aoproval ~efore a grading permit can be issued. Two ~o~ies of the P,-elimina,'y Geotechni~a! report dressing underlying soil conditio,~s including soil bea~ing and e~pans~ve properties shall be furnished. The report shall specifically address site geologic/ seismic parameters for building construction. Recom- mendations regarding footings, interior slabs on grade; allo~able active pressure for retaining ~all construction and clearing and grading operations are to be included. The report shall be submitted to this Department for revie~ and approval. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations addressing off- site tributary areas and ho~ flo~s ~ill be conveyed through the tract must be provided to this department for revie~ and approval. The Q10 and Q100 must be sho~n at all points of entry and exit. Details of all surface and subsurface drainage facilities and protective devices must be sho~n. Provide building footprints on all lots sho~ing all setbacks. Sho~ driveway details on the g,-ading plan along ~ith grades not to exceed 15%. Slope stability calculations ~ith a factor of safety of at least one and five-tenths (1.5~ shall be submitted by a soils engineer for all slopes equal to or g,-eater than 30 feet. Provide proper building setbacks on all pads from top or toe of slopes to the face of structure. the The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be provided ~ith slope planting to minimize erosion. a. Cut slopes equal to or greater than 5 feet ~n vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet in vertical heigN-t shall be planted ~ith grass or ground cover. b. Slopes e~ceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall be planted ~ith shrubs, spaced not to exceed 10 feet on center; or trees, spaced not to exceed ~ feet on center; or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent spacing. c. All slopes required to be planted shall be provided ~ith an irrigation system. d. P?ovide Erosion Control-Landscape plans prepared by a registered landscape architect. Accompanying the plan shall be a cost estimate detailing all costs associated ~ith the project for bonding purposes. DATE: December 18, 1987 TO: Assessor Building and Safety Surveyor - Dave Ouda Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs Flre Protection Flood Control District Fish & Game LAFCO, S Patsley U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davidson RiV :lSiD count,. PLAnninG D PA::IClil nc RIVE~b,ur. PLANNING DEPAgTMENT RECEIVED JAr 1 1988 PALOMAR OBSE~'.~ITORY Rancho Calif. Water Southern Calif. Edison Southern Calif. Gas. General Telephone Temecula Union High School Mr. Palomar Santa Margarita Prop. Owners De. Luz Property Owners Sierra Club Temecula Chamber of Con~nerce Calif. Native Plant SOciety Comiss loner Bresson TRACT 21821 - (Tm-]) - E.A. 32272 - Kaiser Development Company Rancho Pacific Engineering - Rancho California Area - First Supervisortel' District - Northerly of Via Norte, Easterly of Calle Fiesta~_ R-A-I~ Zone Schedule B - 7.71 acres - (Request TR Subdivide into 5 single family residential lots) - Hod 119 - A.P. 919-Z~O-OOZ Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Oiviston Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for February 18, 1988. If it clears, it will then go to public hearing. Your comments and recoranendattons are reque~-)d prior to February 1, 1988 in order that we may include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Gloria Mactel at 787-1363 Planner COllttENTS: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PLEASE prtnt name and title Dr. Robert J. Brucato/Assistant Dtrector/?alomar CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICtr OF THE DIRECTOR PALOMAI~ OIISI~RVATORY I0S-14 This case is within 30 miles of the Palomar Observatory and is therefore within the zone requiring the use of low-pressure sodium vapor lamps for street lighting, as stipulated by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Ve request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that may be employed on this property be made consistent with the spirit of the decision of the Board of Supervisors vhich is intended to mitigate the adverse effects such facilities have on £he astronomical research at Palomar. Beneficial steps to that end include: 1. Use the minimum amount of light needed for the task. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent direct uvward illumination. Turn off lights at 11:00 p.m. (or earlier) unless, in co~ercial applications, the associated business is oven past that time, in which case the lights should be turned off at closing. Use lo~-pressure sodium lamps for road~ays, valk~avs, equipment yards, parking lots, security and other similar a~plications. These lights need not be turned off at 11:00 p.m. For further information, call (818) 356-4035. Robert J. Brucato Assistant Director PASADENA. CALIFORNIA elll.~ TELEPHONE 4418~ J.~e.ioJJ TELEX ef~e.*S CALTECM PSD County Administrative Office April 19, 1988 Mr. Richard MacMort, Supervising Planner Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 SUBJECT: Meadowview Vesting Tentative Tract Map Number 21821 Dear Mr. MacHott: · The following summarizes our findings regarding the fiscal impact analysis for the project identified above. The appendix attached summarizes the basic assumptions used in the analysis. Please note that these results reflect the current levels of service provided by the County based on Fiscal Year 1986 - 1987 actual costs (per capita factors) and Departmental and Auditor-Controller review of operations and facility costs for services reviewed using case study analysis. Staff to the Growth Fiscal Impact Task Force and Departments are currently reviewing service levels provided and the need to increase the levels of service. Current findings are that existing levels of service are not adequate in most cases. Should the desired level of service be utilized in the fiscal analysis performed, it would significantly increase the costs associated with this development. COUNTY FUND (Operations and Maintenance) FISCAL IMPACT AFTER BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE FISCAL IMPACT AT BUILDOUT County General $885 $2,150 F~re $185 $1~ Free Library $57 $57 SUBTOTAL COUNTY $1,107 $2,372 Road Fund (~180) ($180) GRAND TOTAL $927 $2,192 Robert T. Andersen Adminislzative Center 4080 LEHON STREET · 12'rH FLOOR · RIVERSIDE. CAUFORH~ 92S01 · (7141 787.2544 The following special circumstances apply to this project: 1. CAO staff has reviewed library costs wlth Library personnel and incorporated actual operations and maintenance costs into the analysis. Using Library staff estimates of the costs of providing the current level of service, considering the increase in population, this project should result in one-time capital facility costs of $720 (library space, volumes). Llbrary staff has indicated that the current level of service is not adequate. 2. Flood Control staff has indicated that flood control facilities constructed within Zone 7 are unlikely to be sufficiently funded for maintenance costs. Current estimates indicate that funding shortages should occur for the next ten years. Suggested mitigation measures include a cash deposit by the project developer or use of an assessment mechanism. The amount of deposit would be determined by a present value analysis and pro,oct timing. The cost of maintaining flood control facilities will not be known until final design phases, when facility needs have been fully identified. Flood Control staff will, therefore, condition pro, oct approvals to identify a means of financing facility maintenance and operation (if necessary) prior to recordation of subdivisions. Based on the analysis and assuming that tl%e average sales price of the units will be $230,000, overall Vestlng Tentative Tract 21821 will have a positive fiscal impact at buildout of $2,192. After buildout, this pro3ect will have an annual positive fiscal impact to the County of $927 at current levels of service. Initial Review By:~~/ /, · O. FICIAL HEARING NuTICE THIS MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOOR 4080 LEMON STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA ~501-3657 Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director A PUBLIC HEARIMG has been scheduled before the PLANNI!~ C~ISSION to consider the application(s) described below. The Planntng Department has tentatively found that the proposed project(s) will have no significant environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s). The Planntng Con~ntsston will consider whether or not to adopt the negative declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing. Place of Hearing: Board Room, 14th Floor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Date of Hearing: WEONESDA¥, MAY 4, 1988 The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the tire of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or so~eone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Co~nisston at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. TRACT 21821, EA.32272, is an application submitted by Kaiser Development Company for property located in the Rancho California Area and First Supervisorlal Otstrtct which proposes to divide 7.71t acres into 5 lots on property generally described as north of Via Norte, east of Calle Fiesta. TIME OF HEARING: 1:30 p.m. R;VER3iDE COUntY PLanr ,il O,,PA:hJitcn,. APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT DATE: Decembet 14, 19E? ID CHANGE OF ZONE NO. ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. O PARCEL MAP NO C] PLOT PLAN NO. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WtL/, NOT BE ACCEPTED, & APIN, JCANT INFORMATION 1. PUBLIC USE PERMITNO. )C~RACTMAPNO. VESTING O TEMPORARYUSEPERMITNO. VARIANCE NO. Ka£ser Development Company Pacific PLANNING C)~PAKTMEN'T a.m. - 5 I~m.) ~ NOTE :If more thin one Derson ,s involved in th~ owne~l~o of the I~oDer~y I~fng develo~ I ~tate page must ~ litached to fhaS ipplm~hon wh,CK hsfs the names and ladreues ~ 411 ~fso~s having In mteresI m t~e ownersn,p of the pro~y. B. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Purpose of Request (descrH~e project). (Oro~nance 348 rat. no.) subdivide 7.71 acres into 5 single family ~esidencial lots. 2. Related cases hled m COnlUnCbon w,h tl~s request: C. I~OPERTY INFORMATION 1. A~lJo(m Pa~el NO(.). 919-230-002 2. Germrll localran (street ~dm~, eft.) Hocthecly ot Via Notre and Eaat o[ Calla Fiesta 4. AoorommateGro~sAcreage. 7.71 acres Legal deKnpl~o~ (give eaacf ~egal description Is tlt,~dl~ in the Ofhcl O/the County Recmder). May be allached. 6. Thomas Brothers Page No end Comdinates: Page ~ ~m Van ~e Water 4080 LEMON STREET, g'" FLOOR 46-209 OASJS STREET, ROOM 304 ..~ C.' ~E NO. $1.FF USE ONLY ENWRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PART I: Genstel IntermitIon If "Ye~' ~v~e Cl~ Numar AlSO ~o~ I~ Enwr~nlil Am~menl Num~L d know~ end Env(ron~nlal Im~cl Re~ Numar, d IDDI~Ie. ~ NO. If Kn~), EIR NO. I~ e~e) ~ A~flmM/~Nntl ~u may w~lh to lucy rRlrdi~ ~ ~o~ (A~h In I~etmnal ~t ~ fi~e~) PART II: Envlmnmentl! OueltJonrmlm I. Is t~e Ixo~c't wffhin In Ak3uisf-Pnolo Soec~al SI~ Z~e? YES To ~te~i~ ff ~r Dr~ il I~ted in I S~ml S~ml Slay Z~fi MI~ lye,liCe It InS Pu~ Inf~h~ C~nter zo~. refer to Or~n~ ~7 1, ~ 0i~uis t~ liluetlon If I fluIt ~l~ re~ is ~. ~m~ete t~e investSliOn prior to 2. Is t~ ~o~ ~f~ Mfhm I h~8rd msn8gemlnl mini T~hn~l RO~? ~S 0 N~ To determiM d ~ur ~ m suOlecf Io I~ geol~ ~lrdS nole~ I~ ~ lhOuB COnlull I~e "Sl, smc sleety I billy Ellmini T~hn~l RI~ wh<h ~ IvldlDlt II lhe Pu~l< reelsure to mihlmize f~ ~Zlrd. Inc~lte any m,l,gal*on measu;es info t~ ~OMcl ~g,gn prior 1o luOmlthng I~ I~l~. Iron Or indqte lh lhe ~ prov~ ~10w 1he ~esult~ OI v~ Oi~u~ions with ~ P~i~ Telre. 3 If ~ur ~O~ ~ in the desert itel a ~ w~th~fi I blowhd ~zlrd Itel? ~S O N~ The Pllnm~ Off~S m Ind~ I~ R,ve~ide will provue w~sh fo ~nt~f Ihe U.S. ~il Conse~ll~n ~e. If your Dro~f ts su~c~ to ~l~sind huIrd~ Su~m~ ~ Oralmince 460. ~ yo~ ~Ol~t ~l I Mtcel mid ~ 4 IS wller ~w~ce iradidde i1 lhe Drolecl s,e? YES If 'No." how fir musI the wirer Imps) ~ ex~enOed Numt:)er of felt Or miles Further etOllnlPon : If "No.' h~ far mum the wlllr Iin~l) ~ e~en~ to ~ ~ce ? Numar MINI ~ milli ~ Additional COmmentI: PAI~ Iit: Addftfon81 MiteHell 1~l fo/lowi~ #ema must e4 ~bmm~ w~h I~l fo~: 1. AI kill IhMe (31 ~mm~ ~t~q~i (c~ ~nt~ M IM ~oi~ life, Ire uldiZK ~1~ I mid 2. A c~r DhOt~ (Xeroz ~ ~milar ~D~ ~ l~e t~r~ielo ~ion of me U.S, Genteel Su~ey quadrangle maD, deh~ eil~ t~ ~n~rml M the ~ kle. AI~ ~ll the title M the I ~ f~l 1 M~ e~l~IK IM q~lt~ e Pl~l I I~ II Ind Iht InlWla Ire true i~ ~ to I~ ~s~ M my 0 0 0 ~ ,,.t ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N N N ~ N 0 Zk,- ~ 0 I 0 o uJ ~ 0 I I I 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~ O .jr,l 0 '~ · 0.. · Z~"~ N 0 e,,,4 Z LUI.- LU I,- ,,.,.I ,,4 ~.) 2'4' Oe. Ze, Z els ,../ ,,4 ell I~ N I k,., I I 0 0 l-- ~ I,- 0 I I I I ,4' .,I ,~ ~ ~ 0 0 '~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0~ ~ 0~ ~rfilR3m~rTM A.~SS~:NT ~R: ~T~ [VALUATION NLINB£R: ~)227~ Yestin9 Tract 2182! Gloria Haciel HI)OuLE #UHB£R(s): 119 I. H~i~JEL'T £NFONIqATION A. DESCRIPTION (tncluee proposed mtnlmum lot sl.-e end uses es ipoltclble): TO Subdivide 7.71 acres into S single family residential Tots. I. TOTAL PI~Od£CT ~J~EA: ~:RES 7.71 ; or ~UAM[ ~T C. ~S[S~R'S PARCEL NO.(s): 919-230-002 D. [ll~l~ ~IK: R-A-~ IS ~[ P~ IN CONrOYCE? [. ~0~SED Z~IMG: IS T~ ~O~S~ In C~FO~C[? r. STmE[T ~m[NC[S: Northerly of Via NorSe. easterly of Calla Fiesta . Yes G. SECTION, TOMIS#IP, RANG[ DESCAIFTZ0N AND/OR SHO~T LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 29.30 T:75 R:2~ No ~AIEF KSCRIPTION OF THE EIISTIN~ ENVIItONN£NTAL SEtrING OF TIlE RROJECT SITE ANO ITS SUIIROUNOINGS: Project site; rollinq hilts and qrass. Surroundinq: spotted sfnqle family dwellings with large lots C:I~MPRENENSIYE Gl~Ell~l. PLAN OPEN SPAL~ ANO CONSE~¥ATION OESIGMATION C~eck the appropriate Optfort(S) ~1~ I~ prOC~ ICCO~tngl~. All or ~rt of the ~roJect sttets tn 'Adopted Specific P]enst' eREMAP' Or 'Rlncho VflligeS C~nfty Policy Areas.' C~plete ~cttons II!, IV (g end C only). V and Vl. All Or ~rt of t~e project tlte is Jn 'l~ls Not Designated ~s O~n S~ece.' C~lete ~ecti~ns Ill. IV fl, t and D ~1~), V and Vl. All ~ ~ of the project s(te his in O~n Spice end Conse~itton designition other th~n those Mntl~ed I~e. C~ie~e ~c~l~s 13J, IV (A, 8, ind [ on1;), V Ind VJ. Ae IMlclte itU) i )es (f| or ~o (N) m6ether any envlrommntll resource and/Or ~4Zsed issues my Stgntftclntl~ effect or ~ Iffectff by the ~o~sal. All ~fe~nced rigors I~ contlfned In the C~re~nSlve ~nerll Plin. For Iny fssff mrk~ ~s (V) ~lte iddttlonll dltl S~KIS, egonotes co,Mired, findt~s of flct end iny llttgitl~ mlSuqS under Sectt~ V. Local m~nC ]. ~Agrtcul~ (Ftg. ~.~. ~].]S)Famland 7. N ~efitc Htg~ys (Ftg. VZ.aS) Z. ~ In or ~le eft ~rtCU!~rel P~se~e 8. N Historic les~Kes (r(g. YI.JZ - v1.33) (Rtv. ~. ~etculturel Lend Conse~ltt~ ~. ~Archeeologtcil les~rces ~ntrects ~ps) S~ephens' (rsg. vl.3Z - vl.33 & vi.46 - v~.48) 3. ~Vlldllfe (FIg. Yl.31 - Y3.37) KanglrOO Rat ~0. ~Pileontologlce1 Resources 4. ~Vegetltlo~ (rs9. vi.31 - VT.40) (Plle~to1~lcll Restroes ~p) S. HIMiNtel les~Kes {Fig. Vl.41 - Vl.4Z) 11. N 6. H~[Nr~ lesources (Ftg. ~1.4~ Ill. C~. CW~?EMnStVE General P~lh Figure V~.3 aCtrole One). Also, ~ sh~, ct,le t~ IpproprflCt lind use sultlbiltt~ Or nOiSe IccePCabt1~t~ Ll~d Use Su~tJbft~t~ fflt~fi~ Definitions NA - Not ~pllcable. S - ~nera11~ SuitabTe, PS g - gastricted m 4. I4 S. 14 U o Generally Unsuitable. HAZARDS A1qutst-Prtolo SPectal Studtea or IZ.__N Atr~ort Noise (fig. II.]8.S. County Fault NizIrd Zone (Fig. Vl.l) & Vi.IZ & lgr4 AICUZ ~epert, NA PS U R (See rtg. VZ.3) #A A B C D (See rig. Lt~ofacttoe Potential Zones (rig. VZ.]) 13..~N Railroad Noise (Fig. Vi.13 NA S PS U I (See Fig. Yl.4) #A A ! C O (See Fig. VZ.ll) Geoundshaklng Zone (Fig. Vl.I) ]4. N gigbray #01So (ftg. Vl.17 - #A S PS U t (See Fig .VI.S) #A A I C 0 (See rtg. Slopes (ltv. Co. 100 Scale Slope eps) IS. N Other else Leadslide ~lSk SPew (Rtv. Co. 800 Scale #A A I C O (See ftg. Sellitc Pips or On-site Inspection) ]6. N Adjacent else hfislttve Uses NA S PS U R (See Ktg. V1.S) 17. __.NP~Ject GeNreted Notse (fgg. ¥1.~) 6. 141lockfall Nlzlrd (O~-stte lfislNctton) ~8. __.Nelse seastrive Project (Flg. 7.~Expanstve Sells (U.S.D.A. Sotl 19.__.NAtrOvaltt~ lapacts Fr~u Project curm ulattve ConServation hrvtCe SOIl S~rveya) ~0. __NProJect sensitive to Ate Q~i11 I. ~[roston (U.S.O.A. Sot] Conse~Yatto~ ~1. N I MEet Ouiltt~ leOacts rro~ Project Service Sol1S~rveys) ~2. __.NProJect Sensitive to Iditer 8. N ¥tnd [rosto~ & lieusand EFt9. Va.!. ~3. N Hazard,us PaterIlls endYastes · 'd. 460, Sec. ~4.Z & Ord. 484) ~4. N Hazard,us rtr~ Area (rtg. 10. N__DIm Inundation Arel (Fig. Va.7) ZS. --H Other 1]. ~rloodp~atns (Ftg. V].7) Z$. _Of. Other NA U ~ (See Ft9. VI.8) IV. ~ US[ DL'rERHZNAT]ON Cooplite thts part unless the project ts located tn 'Adopted SPeCtftc Planso' 'REMAP' Or 'ganc~o Villages C~untty Poltcy Areas.' ]. 0~(# SPACE AND CONSEgVATION ~AP DESIGNATION(S): 2. LAJlO USE PLANNING AREA: Southwest Territory 3. ~BAR~A. lK ~: Rancho California 4. C~N]~ ~]CT ~[A, ]~ ~Y: S. ~N~ PLY, IF C~N]~ PLM D[S]GNATION(S), IF Not designated as Open Space I. F~r ell Ip~Jects, Indtcato v~th e j~s (V) or no (N) ~ther a~y I~bllc Ceciltales and/Pc seevices tSlues m~ It~f~clnt!~ iffect or ~ effected b~ the prop,all. All ~fe~nced flgu~s I~ iliacarl c~sultH, findln~ of fact, end mltlgltlon mlsures ~de? SOCt(~ Y. PUILIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES I. L ctrculetto~ (Fig. ]v.z-lV.]l. elscuss tn Sec. Y E~lsttng, Planned i Ilequtrod RoadS) Z. Lllke Trails (Ft1. lY.IZ - lY.13) 3. N ¥1ter (Ag~nc~ Letters) see &genc~ 4. ~? (~ency Lettees) letters S, L FIre brvlces (Fig. iV.IS - IV.liE 6. ~S~etff h~lces (Fig, IV,17 - JY.ll) 7. ~ SchHIs (F~I. IV,17 - IV.18) I. L~lid vesta (rig, IV.17 * IV.IS) J* L Pods end Reckorton (~tg. IV.l] - IV.20) Secondary RJdJng & HikJn~ Trails ]0. Y Eeuestrie~ Trails (rtg ZY.]9oJy.~4/gtv, Co. 800 Scale EquestPtaa ]fall Pips) 11. N Utilities (rig. Iv.Zs- IV.261 IZ.__.N Libelrios (Fig. IV,17 ~ IV.It) 13. N Health Servlces (Flg. Iv,17 - IV.J8) 14. N Airports (Fig. !1.18,2 - 11.18.4, ]!.10.8 - ]].18.10 & IV.Z7 - IS, IdOlsaster Pr~parodF~ess ]6. __.N City Spl~re of Influence 17. -H Other -2- C. !f all or part of th~ project Is located tn 'Mopted S(~ctftc Pllfis,' 'R[#AP' Or Ca~nity Pollo! Areas,' revt~ In ~tlll the s~ctflc ~tctes Ippl~lng to the propolo1, c~lete t~ Stlte the ~evifit lind use ~stgnltlons of the i~roprllte docent, I~d therefo~ consistent etch the C~rehenStve ~rll PIIn? 3. ~qulqd lind use uSegory(ilS) for IN p~Hsed l~)eCt: Category Cu~nt le~ use ~tegoe~(les) for t~ lite: Cateqory 3. at11 t~ site have t~ capability to suepo~ the p~posea p. Ject at Its ~l~ t~ tim of develo~nt? Yes ~r11 Plan? ], S~te tN ~Stgfiltt~(S}: kNrl~ Plin? %NFOI~ATI~11 S~JRC~S, IrlI~)]KS OF FACT ~ N~T]GATZ~N ~A.~R~$ For each issue aiPked ~es (Y) under Sections Ill.A, Ill.I and IV.I., tdeatlf~ the Sectloft end !lsua 1. List 411 Iddtttonal rilevent ait~ souses, tnclvdthg agenotes consulted. Z. Silts findings Of fact ~glrdtng efivlrOnMntll conceal. ~Ort ([.Z.R.). 4. Zf Iddttto~11 Info. SiOn tS ~t~d ~fO~ t~ envtro~fitll IslessNot cln ~ c~pleted, ~fer to Subsection B. SECTION/ ISSUE #0. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULT[O, FINDINGS or FACT, HITIGATION MEASURES: I. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IEOUIIE~ IEFOME [NVIRnNHfNT~ AS$[$~H[N! CAN I! COHel!l[O~ DATE DATE SE~'TION/ ]NFOR~qATI~ INtORHATIO# INFOR~AT]ON ISSUE NO. R£OU%M£D ~£QUESTEO REC£IVED ~£OU~TE (vES/Ne) k priplM. Ipplled ~ the project I~ I N~tlve DeclIel~ton m~ ~ prepe~d. (or) -3- OFFICIAL HEARING NOTICE THIS MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY RIVERSIDE COUNT/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY N~INISTRATIV£ CENTER, NINTH FLOOR 4080 LEI~N SIREEl' R[¥ERS[D[, CAL[FORN[A 92501-3657 Roger $. Streeter, Planntng Otrector A PUBLIC HEJM~116 has been scheduled before the PLANNIIIi 13:]~[SSION to consider the application(s) described below. The Planning Department has tentatively found that the proposed project(s) .Ill have no significant environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s). The Planning Cm~tsston wtll consider whether or not to adopt the negattve declaration along ~lth the proposed project at thts heartrig. Place of Heartrig: Board Room, 14th Floor. ~J380 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Date of Hearing: ¥EX)NESDAY, MAY 4, 1988 The ttme of hearing is Indicated with each application listed below. Any person may submtt written con~ents to the Planntng Department before the heartrig or may appear and be heard tn support of or opposition to the adoptton of the negattve declaration and/or approval of this project at the tim hearing. If you challenge any of the projects tn court, you may be 1tatted ~ raJstng only those tssues you or someone else ratsad at the publlc heartng described tn this nottce, or tn wrttten correspondence deltYered to the Planning Convission at, or prtor to, the publlc hearing. The environmental ftndtng along with the proposed project application may be vtewed at the publlc Infomarlon counter I~onday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. TRACT 21821, EA.32272, ts an application submitted by Kaiser Development Company for property located in the Rancho California Area and First Supervisortel District which proposes to divide 7.71~ acres into 5 lots on property generally described as north of Via Norte, east of Calla Fiesta. TIME OF IE. ARII~: 1:30 p.m. ~lllmn LA SERE~ ~. SE~D~ CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT FINAL VESTING TRACT NO. 21821 DATE June 19, 1991 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS Streets and Drainaqe $ 42,000.00 $ 21,000.00 Water $ 14,500.00 $ 7,500.00 Sewer $ -o- $ -o- TOTAL $ 56,500.00 $ 28,500.00 *Maintenance Retention (10% for one year) *(or Bonds if work is completed) $ 6,000.00 Monument Security City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFC Drainage Fee Due Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #~ Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees $ 3,500.00 $ -0- $ 8,511.33 $ 750.00 $ -0- $ -0- Plan Check Fee Due Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fee Paid To Date (Credit) Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due 4,872.58 2,822.56 159.50 7,854.64 -0-- A:FVT21821 ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFTCER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer July 2, 1991 Award of Breathing Support Truck Bid RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award the bid for purchase of one Breathing Support Truck for use by the City Fire Department. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the City's purchasing ordinance, we advertised for bid on one (1) Cab and Chassis, Utility Body, Respiratory Air Compressor and Electrical Light/Power Unit (Breathing Support Truck). The recommended lowest responsible bid received is American Bristol Industries for $204,273.30. FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered Fire Services budget at June 30, 1991, approximated $400,000. Upon Council approval of the bid, $204,273.30 of the June 30, 1991 Unreserved Fund Balance will be designated for the truck and the designation will be carried forward as an FY '92 appropriation. ATTACHMENT: American Bristol Industries Bid submittal NOTE: CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME JUNE 20, 1991 at 4:00PM BID DUE Thursday, June 20, 1991 at 4 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit orice. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. Make.~hassis GMC 'Top-Kick" Model: System MAC III Year: 1 999 Color: Red / White as specified Unit Sale Bid Price: $ 192 , 520.00 Sales Tax: $ ]l , 7~_~n License: $ N.A. TOTAL: $ 204 973.30 * This total includes $ 11,700.00 labor. Sal;s tax is computed on Plea~J~%r~t~ylty~%St~etl~lo~;~nf~l~n~a~h: Should sales tax increase at time of delivery tax will be reflected at time of delivery or may prepay. DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 120 DAY$ AFTER A WARD OF BID Soecifv delivery date after order received: Rpprn~H.?a~'~,ly 910 ~tay.~ ARC1 Payment Terms: Comoany Submitting Bid: Address: Phone Number: Sales Manager (Printl: Authorized Signature: Remarks: A $ 1500.00 discount is offered if the chassis is paid upon ~l~v, ry at ~MRRTCAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES (Harbor City. CA). ** AMRRICAN RRTSTOT. INDU~TRTRR, TNC. 1600 W. 240TH STREET, HARBOR CITY, CA 90710 (213) 534-5981 CHARLES T.. T.AMORRAUX NOTE PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION Please see data package ** Currently the chassis delivery is quoted at 150 days ARO. American Bristol will require 90 days to complete after chassis delivery. AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. '1600 West 240'" Street · Harbor City, CA 90710 · 213-534-5981 * Fax: 213-775-1477 June 20, 1991 City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 Attention: City Clerk Gentlemen: Reference: Bid No. 91-024 Cab & Chassis, Utility Body, Respiratory Air Compressor & Electrical Lighting/Power Unit In response to your request for proposal,AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES is presenting response herewith. This proposal is 100% responsive to the specification. Minor changes, additions and or deletions are noted on the pages entitled "YOUR SPECI- FICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED", pages 1 through 8. All requested "options" are priced on these pages and are identified by option numbers in the "General Specification". The accompanying booklet presents photographs, drawing, and descriptions of all major items proposed. Should there be any questions on this bid proposal, please contact the undersigned. Regards, AMSCAN BR~~USTRIES, INC. Charles L. Lamoreaux, President CLL: g 1 GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT Page 1 1. BODY TYPE: 2. YEAR: 3. MAKE: 4. WHEEL BASE: 5. CAB TO AXLE: 6. G.V.R.W.: 7. FRAME: 8. AXLE, FRONT: 9. AXLE, REAR: YOUR SPECIFICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED As specified 1992 GMC As specified As specified 31,28'0 lbs. As specified 11,000 lbs. as specified per Addendum No. 1 23,000 lbs. as specified per Addendum No. 1 10. SHOCK ABSORBERS: As specified 11. REAR END: As specified 12. ENGINE: As specified 13. RADIATOR: 14. EXHAUST: ,(~ TRANSMISSION: 16. PTO: 17. SPEED: As specified (Water filter will be Perry or equivalent.) As specified As specified (Hayden cooler not recommended by GM because normal installation restricts engine cooling. As specified As specified 18. STEERING: As specified GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT Page 2 YOUR $PECIFiCATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED 19. BRAKES: Air brake system is GM standard - Rockwell. Otherwise as specified. 20. BRAKE SHOES: As specified 21. PARKING BRAKES: As specified 22. BRAKE AIR TANKS: As specified 23. ELECTRICAL: As specified except alternator is driven by a single multi-groove or cog type belt. 24. TIRES: Low profile Michelin 255/70R 22.5, 16 ply - 11,020 lb. front rating and 20,280 lb rear rating. 25. MIRRORS: As specified 26. CAB: GMC "Top-Kick" - As specified. Fuel system is an equalizer type with one gauge. The in tank pumps come on with starter key switch. 27. TURN SIGNAL LAMPS: As specified GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT Page 3 YOUR $PECIFICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED 28. FUEL TANKS: As specified except fuel lines are GM standard - No galvanized parts. 29. FUEL FILTERS: As specified 30. FUEL SHUT-OFF: As specified 31. FUEL PRIMER: As specified 32. FUEL TANK COVER: As specified 33. FUEL TANKS & LINES: As specified 34. FUEL TANK SELECTOR SWITCH: Not required with new GM equalizer system. 35. FRAME: As specified 36. BUMPER, FRONT: As specified GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT YOUR SPECIFIC,4 T!ONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED 37. BUMPER, REAR: As specified Page 4 "~ PAINT: GM standard - synthetic - enamel- color as specified - same on body. 39. BODY: As specified 40. ROOF CONSTRUCTION: As specified 41. ROOF RADIUS: As specified 42. CORNER RADIUS: As specified 43. END & SIDE STRUCTURE: As specified 44. DOOR HINGES: As specified GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT YOUR SPECIFICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED 45. WHEEL WELLS & FENDERS: As specified Page 5 46. RUB RAILS: As specified 47. COMPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION: As specified 48. GRAB RAILS: As specified except rail is made from heavy wall stainless steel tubing. 4.9. FLOOR STRUCTURE: As specified 50. COMPARTMENT ARRANGEMENTS: AS specified 51. DOOR CONSTRUCTION: As specified 52. ROLL UP DOORS: As specified 53. PANEL DOORS: As specified GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT Page 6 YOUR $PECIFICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED 54. PTO ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: As specified. The alternator shall be a LIS~, 5~C series rated at 50 KW. An engine governor system will be provided to very accurately control PTO RPM so that 60 cycle power is assured. 55. AIR COMPRESSOR ASSEMBLY: As specified. Proposing a Becker compressor Model SV600. 56. INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROLS: As specified 57. PURIFICATION SYSTEM: As specified. Model 60AL-4. Proposing FreshAir~ 58. AIR STORAGE SYSTEM: As specified. The requested option for 6000 PSI ASME Receivers is not proposed. The compressor has a maximum pressure rating of 5000 PSI. 59. CHARGING STATION: As specified. The proposed charge chambers shall be the totally en- closed type with locking lid and grate bottom. There is no regulation stating that water is required in fill stations. 60. AIR MONITORING EQUIPMENT: As specified. GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT YOUR $PECIFICATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED Page 7 61. CARBON MONOXIDE (CO): As specified. Both the CO and Dewpoint monitors are integrated into the LE5000 controller. Their individual specifications are enclosed in the data booklet. 62. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION/LIGHTS/CORD REELS: As specified 63. HIGH RISE REEL, TRUCK MOUNTED: As specified. Bright colored high pressure air hose is not available in the 3/16 inch (internal tube) size. This size must be used to get 300 ft. on the specified reel. 64. REMOTE CHARGE STATION: The charge station as described is NO BID. In its place, we propose a 1/4 inch steel charge chamber that is mounted on a two wheel cart. It shall be equipped as specified. 65. LOW PRESSURE AIR HOSE REEL: As specified 66. LIGHT TOWER: As specified OPTION NO. 1. Overall price reduction of ............. $4,620.00 OPTION NO. 2. Overall price reduction of ...... ' ....... $ 250.00 OPTION NO. 3. Overall price reduction of ............. $ 580.00 67. EMERGENCYWARNING DEVICES: As specified Option NO. 1 Midland Model 70-154B ............. $1,020.00 Option NO. 2 Midland Model 70-B26 Batteries 2 EA .... $ 200.00 GENERAL SPECIFICATION CAB & CHASSIS, UTILITY BODY, RESPIRATORY AIR COMPRESSOR & ELECTRICAL LIGHTING/POWER UNIT YOUR SPECIFiCATIONS OF VEHICLE OFFERED Page 8 68. CYLINDER STORAGE: As spec±f±ed 69. PORTABLE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT: As spec±f±ed OPTION NO. 1. 4 ea. 50 ft. extension cords ........... $ 425.00 OPTION NO. 2. 2 ea. REZEK ground fault interrupters.. $ 630.00 OPTION NO. 3. 2 ea. REZEK portable lights ............ $1,220.00 AMERICAN BRISTOl. IND. 1600 WEST 240tll STREET HARBOR CITY, CALIFORNIA 90710 PHONE (213) 534-5981 AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. FreshAir® by AMERICAN BRISTOL AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. (ABI) is the leader in innovating high quality products to meet the requirements of the Fire Service, Industry, Marine and other related industries. These products include: The latest technology in BREATHING AIR CYLINDER CHARGING SYSTEMS. State-of-the-Art low and high pressure BREATHING AIR COMPRESSORS AND PURIFIERS PROVIDING "SUPPLIED AIR "to painters, chemical workers, hazardous material handlers, etc. AIR QUALITY TESTING AND MONITORING/ALARM SYSTEMS for breathing air purity verification. HIGH INTENSITY, TELESCOPING, VEHICLE MOUNTED, FLOOD LIGHT TOWERS for illumination of emergency scenes. COMPUTERIZED CONTROL AND MONITOR SYSTEMS for compressors,motors, engines and breathing air charging systems. Otherproducts include systems for COMPRESSING, PURIFYING, STORING AND CHARGING ALL COMMERCIAL GASES iNCLUDING NATURAL GAS. Pressures up to 10,000 PSI and outputs over 1000 SCFM. A complete line of standard and custom products, portable, stationary or mobile (trailer and vehicle mounted) are available. For over twenty five years ABI has provided the highest quality products and services. With a staff of dedicated employees, ABI provides customers with parts, service and complete "turn key" installation. Call on us, we welcome the opportunity to serve you. To Better Serve You We Offer "INNOVA TION not IMITATION" 1600 W. 240th Str~t Harbor City, California 90710 (213) 534-5981 199] 'TO?X]CK LOF'RO 6000' :'THE TRUCX WITH LOW-LOADING :-] EIGHT AN D BiG PAYLOADS! TOPK]CX LOP O ...A N EV'I H ] G H IN ODU CT]¥]'T"/ LOW-PROFILE DESIGN LIGHTENS THE WORK, SPEEDS UP THE JOB LoPro is the new GMC Truck TopKick specially designed for applications that call for easy hand loading and high load-carrying capacity. Plus, it offers advanced features unmatched either by beefed-up light duty trucks or many non-GM mediums. LoPro's unloaded frame height can be as low as 33.9-in * -- about five inches lower than a typical medium- duty truck. That means work-saving, time-saving cargo handling with vans, fiatbeds, contractor and stake bodies. Because there's less strain required in loading and unloading, productivity can be substantially improved. And the big load capacity means you can put plenty of freight out back where it counts, which can translate into fewer trips per day. It all adds up to a truck that really delivers on muscle, hustle, efficiency and economy. TopKick technology...a brand-new world standard for medium duty conventionals. TopKick was intro- duced in 1989 as a completely new design. New cab. New frame. New suspension. New electrical system. New diesel power by Caterpillare. Plus the newest developments in gasoline engine efficiency, including Electronic Fuel Injection and Electronic Anti- knock Control for improved perfor- mance. LoPro offers the same advanced features for quality, depend- ability and low cost of ownership. Ask your GMC Truck Dealer for a TopKick LoPro Demo. · Frame height at centerline of rear axle, with truck unloaded and equipped with 225/70R 19.5/F tires, i 5,000-lb tapered leaf rear springs and available lowered-suspension option. ] ht D EX PAGE Durability/Serviceability Features ............. 4-5 Cab Features ............ 6 Gasoline and Diesel Engines ............... 7 Technical Data/ Dimensions ..... Back Cover PAYLOADS UP TO 16,057 LB + Available GVWR's go from ! 5,440 lb all the way to 23, I O0 lb. Maximum payload capacity ranges from 8,397 lb to ! 6,057 lb. + That's enough muscle to move heavy freight, without getting into the expense of a larger medium duty truck, or over- working a beefed-up light-duty model. In many applications, it can mean bigger loads, more profitable routes and higher efficiency. A choice of gaso- line or diesel power plus a wide selec- tion of available chassis components help you fit TopKick LoPro to suit your job requirements. + Includes weight of cargo, body. optional equipment, fuel and occupants. TOPKICK LOPRO OUT-MANEUVERS FORD LPO Thanks to a 50 ° wheel turn angle, LoPro gets around easily in city traffic, crowded loading areas and tight parking spaces. The ! 44-in wheelbase LoPro has a curb-to-o'~ turning circle of just 41.7 ft. Tha much better than Ford's LPO mealum!~ with I z, I -in wheelbase and a 47.8 ft curb to curb dimension. Which truck would you rather drive in the city? Easy-service features help save time and labor. A typical example is the standard SMC fiberglass hood that tilts forward 78° to provide wide- open access to the engine and other components. Brake hydraulic tank and windshield washer fluid tank provide for fast visual inspection of fluid level. Consider these additional features for fast service and low maintenance: [] Delco Freedom II battery never needs refilling with water [] No adjustments for idle speed or fuel-air mixture on 6.0L V8 gasoline engine [] Standard clutch has cerametallic friction facing for long life [] Standard transmission comes with Fuller CD-50 oil for extended service intervals [] Front/rear disc brakes include a self- adjusting feature [] Large fuse block has tweezer-type fuse removal for easy serviceability ~oPro hauls large ~yl~s with a vadeW of b~ Wpes Hand loading is easier b~au~ of I~ b~ height. .] WB(IN) CA(IN) CE(IN) OL(IN) C6H042 144 72 123 227 · ~ C6H042 156 84 135 239 C6H042 174 102 170 274 C6H042 192 120 188 292 C6H042 209* 138 229 333 C6H042 228* 156 248 352 C6H042 240* 168 260 364 C6H042 261' 188 281 385 TOPKICK LOPRO TRUCK MODEL DIMENSIONS (NOMINAL) BODY LENGTH(FT} 9-10 10-12 12-15 14-18 16-20 18-22 20-24 20-26 -! · Available as ~oecial Equipment Option Power assist steering is standard for added driver comfort. It teams up with TopKick LoPro's easy handling features to help save time, reduce fatigue and help improve productivity on the job. Eight wheelbases are available to suit a variety of bodies and equip- ment from refrigerated vans to flat- beds. These rugged single-axle trucks offer choices ranging from 144-in up to 261 -in -- enough to cover body lengths from 9 ft to 26 ft. Delivery Van Body Flatbed Body Emergency Vehicle BOdy Wrecker Body Lawn Treatment Body M T UCK TOPKICK LOPRO...DURABILITY AND QUALITY UPTIME DESIGN Hydraulic disc brakes front and rear provide effective stopping power. Self- adjusting feature helps reduce maintenance. ]-:,~..~ Two-Sid~ Galvanize~ Steel Phosphate Spray Uniprime Immersion High Solid Acrylic Enamel F nish Paint Maxi Fuses offer improved serviceability and uptime. Engine compartment location helps simplify diagnosis if problems occur. Standard ! 5,000-lb capacity para- bolic tapered leaf rear suspension provides impressive ride, handling and durability. Tuned rear shock absorbers are standard. Available spring spacers lower the rear suspen- sion by approximately 3/4-in; these require available tapered leaf rear suspension, plus modified exhaust for increased ground clearance (auxiliary TopKick LoPro's corrosion-fighting design features include: [] The use of two-side zinc- coated galvanized steel for all cab exterior panels, except the roof, to help prevent rust formation ~ Zinc-phosphate coating to form a bond between sheet metal and paint ~ Total Cab immersion in electrically charged primer springs are not available with lowered suspension). Tou~h, reliable components help control costs. Standard features include: [] Centralized relay center helps simplify electrical troubleshoot- ing [] Wired ground system provides a reliable ground path for cab and lighting circuits [] Positive-lock elec- [] A coat of high-solids acrylic enamel color paint [] Tight metal-to-metal fits and extensive cab sealing to keep out water and dirt ~ Corrosion-resistant SMC fiberglass con- struction for fenders and tilt hood ~ Flexible, corrosion-resistant grille C Fenders are flexible and detachable. trical connectors minimize discon- nects and terminal blackouts [] Electronic speedometer with no cable to break or make noise [] Multi-piece hood for ease of repair if damaged [] Flexible fenders to reduce incidental damage [] Floor mat reinforced in high-wear pedal area [] Corrosion- resistant exhaust system with stain- less steel pipes. Standard rugged frame with 50,000 PSI yield strength and 497,000 RBM has straight, fiat, full-depth rails to aid in body installation. An available 80,000 PSI weldable frame is unique in the medium duty field. Robotic paint application helps assure proper amount and coverage. of the brilliant coat of color paint. Sin~!e-speed Eaton rear axle, rated at 15,000 lb, features a ring gear backed up by a thrust screw. This provides added support to limit ring gear deflection under shock loads. Steel-belted radial low-profile tires help reduce height for easy loading. Standard size is 225/70R 19.5/F. Automatic fuel transfer, included with available dual tanks for gaso'~ engines, shows total fuel level on gage, eliminates manual switching of tanks. Precision robotic welding helps ensure that parts are joined together accurately to form a strong, durable cab structure. I 1 I , use box it mounted in instrument panel on the driver's [ iide for easyaccess. I Energy-absorbing · ~esi~n...it's an indus- ,ry "l~rst" in medium ~, ~iuty trucks. i [I '1 Hydraulic fluid sensor monitors brake fluid level to save time on service checks. · Available ! ! -in cab assist handles help reduce driver effort. Squeeze-type door handles are easy to operate even with a gloved hand. Accurate fits result from the latest robotic high technology. Critical sheet metal fits are measured by laser-gaging computers. Cbncealed drip gutters keep rain out of the cab, add to aerodynamics and appearance. l:r i! Standard Fuller 5-speed manual transmission is synchronized in 2nd through 5th gears for easy shifting. Roadranger synthetic lubricant needs no replacement for 250,000 miles. Helps reduce service time. Advanced-design alternator pro- vides high output at engine idle speed with reliable, efficient operation. Standard 540 CCA Delco Freedom II + battery with gasoline engine provides high capacity for starting and lighting. Batteries are located close to the starter to reduce cable length and minimize voltage drop. Battery never needs water to be added. Another feature to help increase uptime. Ease of maneuvering begins with an 8100-lb capacity I-beam front axle designed to allow a 50 ° turn angle with all TopKick LoPro models. Standard tapered leaf front springs are rated at 7000 lb. 8100 and 5850 lb springs are available. 6 A CAB THAT'S ]BIG ON COMFORT AND DURA]BILITY The roomy TopKick LoPro cab has been carefully designed with the latest technology to be an efficient and productive place to work. For comfort, there's plenty of stretch-out living shoulder, hip and leg room. For exceptional visibility, there's more glass area (29.56 sq ft) than any North American-built conventional medium. An energy-absorbing steer- ing column is an industry first in TopKick LoPro's class. Ask your GMC Truck Dealer for details. Available tilt steering wheel option includes intermittent windshield wipers. Steering wheel adjusts to ddvers of different builds. Consider these additional advantages: [] Wide steps with a low step height help take the strain off drivers who are frequently in and out of the cab. [] Extra-wide standard vinyl bench seat has room for the driver and two passengers. [] Seating options include available air or mechanical suspension driver seat, bucket driver and passenger seats and dual passenger seat. [] Large-diameter soft steering wheel provides a comfortable grip to help reduce driver fatigue [] Concealed drip gutters keep rain out of the cab, add to aerodynam- ics and appearance [] Side window defoggers help pro- vide clear vision in cold weather [] Multi-function switch allows finger- tip control of headlamp high beam, turn signals, and windshield wipers/washers [] Low-profile floor design provides a nearly fiat floor with a low trans- mission tunnel for comfortable foot space. [] Outside air vent system provides good control of outside air for inside comfort. 1 S~.d~rd SL and avajl~l~ sLEtrJm are o~r~ Jn Gray or Saddle colo~ Jn vinyl or cloth. SLE tdm sh~n. High-mount instrument cluster allows a clear view of gages. Notice the easy readability of the large clear numbers. It includes a high-accuracy electric speedometer with quiet operation; eliminates cable and cable noise. In addition to a full gage package, warning lights are provided to signal underhood malfunctions. Gage cluster is front-loaded for ease of access and service. GMC TRUCK LOPRO 6000 SPECIAL TECHNICAL DATA SERIES 6000 GASOUNE DIESEL G'~R (LB1' MINIMUM 15.440 15.440 MAXIMUM 23,100 23,100 MAXIMUM GL"WR (LB) 30.000 30.000 GAS ENGINE 6.0L (366 CID) EFI V8 STD -- )IESEL ENGINE 6.6L (403 CID) Cateroillar Turbocharged/ Aftercooled -- STD FUEL TANK CAPACITY 3S-Gallon Step Type STD STD Dual 3S-Gallon Step Type AVAIL AVAIL AIR CLEANER Dry-Type STD STD EXHAUST Single Horizontal STD STD EXHAUST MODIFICATION · ' (Increased Ground Clearance) AVAIL AVAIL TRANSMISSION S-Sod Fuller FS4005B (Direct) STD STD MANUAL S-Sod Fuller FS4005C (Short 4thl AVAIL AVAIL 6-SOd Fuller FS5106 (Direct) -- AVAIL TRANSMISSION AUTOMATIC 4-SOd Allison AT-545 AVAIL AVAIL CLUTCH 13' Single-Plate Cerametallic STD STD REAR AXLE CAPACITY (LBI 15.000 1 -Sod Eaton STD STO ! 5,000 2-Sod Eaton AVAIL -- REAR SUSPENSION 1 $,000 Tapered Leaf STD STD CAPACITY (LB) Spdng S~cerst [Lowerect SuspensionJ AVAIL AVAIL FRONT AXLE CAPACITY (LB) 8100 STO STD FRONT SUSPENSION 7000 STD STD CAPACITY [LBI 81 O0 AVAIL AVAIL · Various ot~er GVWRs avadaDle acco~r~ to sus~oen$~on ancl t~re seJect~on EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR DIMENSIONS [ACTUAL) Bumper to Back of Cab {BBQ 104' Bumper to Front Axle (BA) 32' Front Axle to Back of Cab (FAQ 73' Overall Height [OH) 91.1 ' Inside Bottom of Frame to ToD of Cab 67' Overall Width lOW) 94' _~.. Front Tread 77' '~eacl Room 40.2' Leg Room 40.9' Shoulder Room 66.0' H 0 Room 65.0' · AOp~ox~m~t~ · · Requ,red wth Lowered Sus~oenc.~o~ Opt~. WB(IN.) CA(IN.) CE(IN.) OL(IN.) 71,0 122.5 226.7 83.0 134.5 238.7 101.0 170.1 274.3 119.0 188.1 292.3 136.0 229.1 333.3 155.0 248.1 552.3 167.0 260.1 364.3 188.0 281.1 385.3 C6H042 144 C6H042 156 C6H042 174 C6H042 192 C6H042' 209 'C6H042' 228 C6H042' 240 C6H042' 261 ' A~ailal)le as S0eoal E~ui0ment Op~en A WORD ABOUT THIS CATALOG We have tried to make this catalog as comprehensive and factual as possible. We reserve the right, however, to make changes at any time, without notice, in prices, colors, materials, equipment, specifications, models and availability. Since some information may have been updated since the time of printing, please check with your GMC Truck Dealer for complete details. A WORD ABOUT ASSEMBLY OF GMC TRUCKS GMC Trucks are assembled by different operating units of General Motors, its subsidiaries or suppliers to GM worldwide. GMC Trucks incorporate thousands of components produced by different operating units of GM, its subsidiaries or suppliers to GM worldwide. We sometimes find it necessary to produce GMC Trucks with different or differently sourced ~ Oenee~ I~ CO~ lggO. All Rig~t~ Re,enid. 4457-91 SERIES 6000 GASOUNE DIESEL FRONT SUSPENSION CAPACITY {LB} (Cont'd} S8S0 AVAIL AVAIL STEERING Hydraulic. Power, Assist STD STD BRAKES. HYDRAULIC Dual Power Hydraulic Split System Fronts Rear Disc STD STD 6RAKES. AIR Full Air System AVAIL AVAIL FRAME Hot Rolled Steel (RBM 479.000) 50,000 PSI STD STD Hot Rolled Steet (RBM 1.378.300180.000 PSI {Weldable) AVAIL AVAIL REINFORCEMENTS Outside Inverted (L Reinforce- mefitl AVAIL AVAIL GENERATOR Oelcotron 85 Am0 STD -- Oelcotron 100 Amp -- STD Oelcotron ] 05 Amp AVAIL -- Delcotron 120 Amp AVAIL -- Delcotron 130 Amp -- AVAIL DELCO BATTERY Freedom II 540 CCA STD -- Freedom II 770 CCA AVAIL -- Dual Unehau11500 CCA -- STD Oual Unehaul 1250 CCA AVAIL AVAIL Dual Linehaul 1800 CCA -- AVAIL WHEELS 19.5 X 6.75 (8-Hole Steel Disc} STD STD TIRES 225,70R19.SF STO STD 245~ 70R 19.5 F AVAIL AVAIL 8-19.5D (6ias Ply) AVAIL AVAIL 8R 19.5E AVAIL AVAIL 8R 19.5F AVAIL AVAIL t Requires avada~,le Taoeff~l Leaf Susoer~sle~ ancl Exhaust Moclificat~.. 94.0 I I WB CE i CA j ' I OL I components than originally scheduled. All such components have been approved for use in GMC Trucks and will provide the quality performance associated with the GMC Truck name. Since some options may be unavailable when your vehicle is assembled, we suggest you verify that your vehicle includes the equipment you ordered or, if there are changes, that they are acceptable to you. A WORD ABOUT UPDATED SERVICE INFORMATION GMC Truck Division regularly sends its dealers useful service bulletins about GMC Truck products. GMC Truck Division monitors product performance in the field. We then prepare bulletins for servicing our products better. Now you can get these bulletins, too. Askyour dealer. To get ordering informa- tion, call toll free 1-800-55 ! -4123 At your GMC Truck Dealer, financing or leasing your new GMC Truck is as easy as saying GMAC...the financial services people from General Motors. TRUCK I L~t~O in USA Allison Automatics automatic models for trucks a. nd buses worldwide I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~T ~ 1 16 Diesel 6.0 Liter Gabline V8 FUEL INJECTED 6.0L aluminum ~istons with steel struts; The ~T ~ 11 ~ represents the finest GASOLINE V8 hea~-du~ bulkheads ~r cranksha~ application of modern engine design The Lopro engine lineu~ offers supron; double roller chain and and technolo~ with features such as: hor~Power and toroue ratin~ to s~rocket camsha~ drive; s~11ite ~ Li~h~ei~ht design and alloy hel~ you match the ~nrine to ~our exhaust valves; ~11-Pressure lubrica- castin~ reduces engine weight job needs Gasoline m~del is t~e bi~ tion and bi~ 24-26 qua~ coolin~ 1060 lb. less clutch 8 0 Liter ~ with Ele~ronic Fuel Inj~c- system. ~ Osdllatin~ roller cam followers ti~n {EFI}. Developin~ 205 SAE net ~ DIESEL ~edu~ i.nternal ~i~io~ horsepower at 4000 RPM and Diesel models are Powered with the ~25 Ib/~ net torque at 2400 RPM. turbocharged/a~ercooled ~T® ~ ~uel unes are macn,ne~ tns~oe [ne th s ~roven v8 has enou h muscle to 1 n f engine block to slmph~ exterior ' ~ ~1 6, o eo the most advanced . '.. ' ' ' move bi~ loads e~ciently through the diesel engines on the road pium~n~ Lle~ronic ~uel injection ennances its power output it's rated at o~ dr .eab, ~. ~a n~?ance 2600 RPM. Th,s h,gh-compress,on requirements are reduced oecause workhorse ~enerates a whopping m onboard computer continually adjusts excellent pullin- nower ~r hau in- '~"~ ....... ?~ '.~ ....~" ,' ..... the engine ~el m~xture · · ~ ~ = ane expense ~rlng ovemaul · maximum loads or climbing hills. A Other engine ~atures include cast- 185 SAE gross ho~wer version . is available. Hi~-~omance aluminum ~diator high-tomue capacid, ce~me~llic ~Jon featur~ impr~ torosion resis~nce ~r p~line e~ne dei~e~ qukk ~ in all ~cin~ for long li~, and I~ pedal eftor to long li~. It al~ provid~ si~nifi~nt weight ~er, ~us sm~ d~abili~. It com- r~uce d~ver ~tigue. Low ine~ia feature ~vings over comparable cop~rtbrass bines with El~ronic Spa~ Control for allows easy shining, especially when down- design radiatom. resmnsive ~ance and g~ ~el 7 Allison Automatics An Abrams XM1 main battle tank-elusive, swift, with devastating firepower-races across open terrain at close to 50 MPH. A medium duty truck moves smoothly through city traffic on its beverage delivery route. Two vehicles with radically different missions but with something in common-Allison Automatic transmissions. The XM1 uses an Allison X-1100 transmission to harness the 1500 horsepower generated by its gas turbine engine. The beverage truck featu esSson AT 545-the automatic transmission that more and more medium duty truck operators are sl~ecifying~t'~T~l:A'ov~_. vehic!e-productivity and efficiency. These two transmissions reflect the immense amount of technological know-how and manufacturing expertise that has made Detroit Diesel Allison the world's leading producer of automatic transmissions. Today, more than 200 manufacturers throughout North America and around the world offer Allison Automatics in over 1000 different equipment applications. It's likely that any medium or heavy duty truck you may be considering today for a city, highway or on/off highway application is available with an Allison Automatic to efficiently complement engine howe Th,s brochure highlights the features oJth~ !try' ' the benefits they can brine to your vehicle. ;"-'~ ~ I~-~ Built right... .. -~~:~. ~,.-~::.:~:~ ~.~,. !ugging and no need to "get on" and with precision machines 'get off" the accelerator while shift- and people who care ·-. .. ,~~~.~;,~p~ ing. The precise, calculated shifts of ' ~: ~ ~"'-_.~';.-~,.. ::1 the automatic result in controlled, I Allison transmissions are the prod- , ~ ~.~. - /-~ , efficient use of fuel. In a test of fuel act of a highly skilled and dedicated ' ~ ?~- ::i~_. ~._~. efficiency, the United States Auto work force. Org,a, nized in "Quality .. -;~j~%m~.~_' ~ ,..7i ~ Club (USAC) supervised two com- Action Program panels, each ./~.,-- . ;~ ~.~ perison tests between van type I member of the team is well aware ., ! ,.. ~ . delivery trucks, identical except for of his responsibility to produce a quality product. And each team member has a say not only in how things are done but in how to do things better. Recognizing that you can't inspect quality into a product, our quality control program includes a unique version of statistical process control to aid the machine operator in doing his job right the first time. We are also working with truck manufac- turers to ensure that proper installa- tion procedures are followed. That way you have the assurance that not only is the transmission built right, it's also installed right. transmissions. In each test, one ~[~..~'~ ~ ", . truck was equipped with an Allison ~'.~;- Automatic, the other with a manual, Fuel economy A manual transmission and the heavy foot of some truck drivers can knock fuel economy for a real Iccp. It's the very nature of an Allison Automatic to work for you to save fuel. The Automatic is programmed to select the proper operating gear range for speed, Icad and road conditions. Its decisions are not subject to driver temperament or skill. The Allison Automatic gets loads started smoothly and quickly with no engine overspeeding or transmission. Results of the testing showed the Allison Automatics top- ped the fuel economy of the stick equipped trucks. What's more, results of fleet testing have shown that Allison Automatics, on average, turn in fuel economy equal to, and at times even better, than identical trucks with manual transmissions. RESPIRATORY AIR PURIFICATION SYSTEMS RESPIRATORY AIR PURIFICATION *- INTRODUCTION: The purity of high pressure air used for life support must exceed that which we normally breathe. The atmosphere in an average metropolitan area contains over 4 million dust particles in each cubic foot of air. Eighty percent of these particles are less than 2 microns in size. Other harmful liquid and gaseous contaminants present include hydro- carbons, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, ozone and oxides of nitrogen and sulfur. Add to these the contami- nants generated by the compressor itself, such as oil, water, carbon and wear particles and the total purification task can be appreciated. Compressor intake filters can remove particles 5 to 10 microns and over, but will not stop the other liquid and gaseous contaminants mentioned. That's where we come in ...... The FreshAir® line of American Bristol Purification Systems were developed to achieve the complete removal of all harmful contaminants. Air purity exceeds all recognized respiratory air standards set by U.S. Navy, Compressed Gas Association and the National Fire Protection Association. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: All FreshAir~ Purification Systems include a Mechanical Separator, Purification Chamber(s), a Pressure Gauge, a Safety Relief Valve, a Check Valve, a Back Pressure Valve and a Chemical Change Indicator. Electronic Air Quality Monitors are optionally available. The purification chambers are manufactured in accordance with the ASM E Cod__e fo_.zr Unfired Pressure Vessels and have a 4 to I safety factor. They are extruded from aluminum alloy 6351 which has a minimum tensile strength of 47,000 PSI. This alloy is a newly developed metal with strength and corrosion resistant properties approaching that of stainless steel, but has the advantage of a marked reduction in weight. Another advantage of 6351 is its nonsusceptibility to stress corrosion which affects steels and most other aluminum alloys. Pressure chambers made of this material have been pressure cycled 500,000 times without fatique failure which represents a life of about 1,000 years for a chamber being cycled once a day. Each purification chamber is_.equipped with an integral safety burst disc. SYSTEM OPERATION: Air enters the FreshAir® Purification System through the Mechanical Separator section of the first purifier chamber. Here it is expanded and cooled. This causes the oil and water vapor to condense on the sides of the chamber wall where it coalesces, drains and collects in the moisture sump. The remaining oil aerosol, water vapor and some of the other contaminants in the air are removed as the air passes through the adsorbant chemical bed. After leaving this chemical bed the air still contains some gaseous hydro-carbons, carbon dioxide, ozone, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur and odors. To remove these the air is passed through activated carbon. Carbon monoxide is controlled by passing the air through a catalyst chemical bed to convert it to carbon dioxide which is then removed by activated carbon. Final particulate filtration is achieved by a micron filter integrated into each carriage. All this to provide you the very purest air for life support. FreslU~-ir~ Purification Systems are SAFE, DEPENDABLE, EASILY MAINTAINED and are the MOST MODERN and EFFICIENT systems available. COMPARE THESE SUPERIOR DESIGN FEATURES AND ACCESSORIES: · Non-corroding, long life Aluminum purification chambers. · · Safety burst disc located in each purification chamber. · · Moisture drain and bleed valves integrated into each chamber. · · Non rusting/corroding disposable chemical cartridges. · Double sealed chemical cartridges prevent by-pass. · 5 micron particulate filter in each chemical cartridge. · Chemical cartridges changed in minutes without tools. · All purification chemicals may be contained in a single cartridge. Automatic Moisture Separator Drain. Electronic Air Quality Monitors/Alarms Extra Charging Hose Assemblies. 1600 W. 240TH STREET, HARBOR CITY, CALIFORNIA 90710 · (213) 534-5981 · (213) 775-1477 o L AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. SPECIFICATION LE5000 CONTROLLER-MONITOR The LE5000continuously controls ~nd monitors all significant functions and parameters of a re~iratory dr compressor system. If an out of tolerance or unsafe condition occurs, the controller will stop the compressor and advise the status of the system in words, on s four line LCD display. FUNCTIONS ! PARAMETERS MONITORED AND CONTROLLED COEH~RESSOR ASSEMBLY Compressor start/stop (stop - advise normal and alarm abnormal condition) Discharge air pressure (stop - advise normal condition) Auto condensate drain control (cycle drain function, advise normal condition) Purge control (on shutdown, ~dvise normal condition) Oil level and/or pressure (stop, alarm and advise abnormal condition) Inlet filter pressure drop (advise maintenance requirement). This is ~n optional feature PURIFICATION SYSTEM a. Dewpoint monitoring/control (stop, alarm and advise abnormal condition) b. Carbon monoxide monitoring/control (stop, alarm and advise abnormal condition) c. Auto condensate drain control (advise status-normal condition) d. 'Purge' control (advise status-normal condition) HOUSEKEEPING Total time on compressor ~sembly (advise time on command) Time since compressor service (resthie, advise time on command) Time since purification cartridge change (resetable, advise time on command) Time on dewpoint (DP) monitor cell (resetable, advise time on command) Time on Carbon Monoxide (CO) monitor cell (reset·hie, advise time on command) Automatic calibration of DP and CO monitors (advise procedure on command) ALAI~S (AUDIO/VISUAL) a. Hinh discharge air temperature - with -utomatic compressor '$TOP','OVERRIDEable' with a'MAX' upper limit, not "OVERRIDEable'. The upper limit is factory set. b. High discharge air carbon monoxide - with automatic compressor 'STOP','OVERRIDEable' with · 'MAX'upper limit of 30 PPM not 'OVERRIDEable". Used in an emergency to SAVE A LIFE. c. High dischame air moisture fdew ~oinfi - with a "WARN" to advise a pending filter (purification cartridge) change; an "ALARM" with automatic compressor "STOP", 'OVERRIDE·hie' with · 'MAx'upper limit factory set at · safe condition. 'OVERRIDE' ~ in an emergency to SAVE A LIFE. d. Low oll level andlot pressure - with automatic compressor 'STOP' - not 'OVERRIDEable'. SPECIAL FEATURES AND ALARM5 a. Prolonged mu time coatmi. Will stop the compressor assembly when predetermined continuous run lime has been exceeded. An audio/visual alarm and word advise is presented on the abnormal condition. 'RESET" is required Time limit for "OVERRIDE' operation. Prevents a potential unsafe condition ifa system were left in 'OVERRIDE' operation. A maximum run time is factory set, preventing prolong operation at a marginal condition. An andio/visual alarm and word advise is presented of the abnormal condition. Time dehy for false alarm recognition. Pre-programmed to prevent false alarms from stopping the compressor or initial system setup and on filter change. 1600 W. 240th Str~.et Harbor City. Callfomla 90710 (213) 534-5981 Ilk'ROLLER- MONITOR WiTH SERIES 1000 ELECTRONIC CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) MONITORS DARE TO CO.MPA E THE SERIES 1000 The Series 1000 Electronic Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitors, exclusively equipped with Lightning Electronics' "Mini" Electro Chemical Sensor Cell, are continuous monitoring alarms, capable of accurately detecting as little as 1 ppm of CO in an air supply line or any area (room). Series 1000 monitors alert, immediately, to unsafe levels of CO, and instantly provide an audio/visual alarm. Series 1000 monitors have been exclusively designed as air pressure line monitors. They are not adaptations of "area" monitors. The flow control circuits are integrated into the instrument case. They filter and reduce the line pressure to a very low value prior to final control and delivery to the sensor cell. False alarms caused by external contamination (pressure line models), are prevented by this exclusive control system. SPECIFICATIONS: SUPERIOR FEATURES: All series 1000 Monitors contain Lightning Electronics' patented "Mini" Electro Chemical Sensor Cell. This ceil represents the latest developments in diffusion/fuel ceil technology. Only high quality circuits and components are employed in the electronics, decreasing "drift", allow- ing the monitors to be turned "ON" only when needed. Warm-up time is less than 5 seconds. The Latching Auxiliary Relay in Model 1010 indicates an alarm condition after it has ceased to exist. This is particularly important when compressing breathing air. The monitor will alert the presence of an intermittent potential danger, such as, excessive Carbon Monoxide from external sources. 4. The Auxiliary Relays in models 1010 6. and 1020 are designed into the units to indicate and/or control other functions -- remote alarms, stop compressor, etc. The "overfide" will allow a compressor (or other function) to run in the event of an Range -- 0 - 100 ppm and 0 - 500 ppm Sensitivity -- 1.0 ppm .... 'ccuracy -- + 1% Full Scale . inearity -- + 1% Full Scale Zero Drift -- +.5% Per day Alarm- Audio -- 95 @ 1 FL -- Visual ~ LED emergency where the contamination level is not significantly high. The "ceil saver" circuit in Model 1010 can more than double the Sensor Ceil life by allowing airflow only where the compressor/purification or other pro- cess system is in operation. All Series 1000 monitors have metal cases, filtering circuits and shielding to prevent false alarms caused by Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) and Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI). Operating Temperature Range -- 32°F to 105°F Power -- 115V AC or 12VDC Inlet Pressure ~ H.P. Model -- 0 to 5000 psig -- L.P. Model -- 0 to 200 psig -- Area Model -- Ambient Pressure Inlet Fiffing -- Pressure Line Models -- 1/4 NPT Female Calibration -- Span Gas MODEL LE 1010 This "top of the line" unit is a PRESSURE LINE or AMBIENT "AREA" monitor, designed for panel/rack or shelf/bench. P.P.M. ALARM AUDIO OVERRIDE MUTE POWER lIESET OFF ~ PORT ,.~ ADJUST - r 50/50 Standard Features: -- direct reading digital scale of 0 to 100 ppm with an adjust- able AUDIO/VISUAL ALARM capable of being PRESET to any desired alarm condition. m an AUDIO "MUTE" switch which is LED lit when actuated. -- an OVERRIDE LED switch continues the operation. When actuated the switch is LED lit to indicate the condition. -- Power ON/OFF switch. Exclusive Features: -- recorder output, latching auxiliary relay (described in No. 3 above), automatic flow control, automatic "zero" adjust- ment and "cell saver" circuits (No. 5 above), alarm and test circuit. Dimensions: 5.3" H X 6" D X 5.5" W Weight: 5.0 lbs. Models: LE 1010/H.P. -- High pressure air line monitor LE 1010/I_P. ~ Low pressure air line monitor LE 1010/Amb. -- Ambient (Area) air monitor Options: -- NEMA weatherproof case, 9" H X 4.5" D X 7" W, weight 1.5 lbs. (Add "N" to Model No.) · MODEL LE 1020 This mid-line FULL FUNCTION ECONOMY model is a wall mounted unit designed with all the STANDARD features of the Model LE 1010. Dimensions: 7.4" H X 3.1" D X 4.0" W Weight: 3.5 lbs. Models: LE 1020/H.P. -- High Pressure air line monitor LE 1020/LP. -- Low Pressure air line monitor LE 1020/Arab. -- Ambient (area) air monitor Option: ~ NEMA weatherproof case, 9" H X 4.5" D X 7" W, weight 1.5 lbs. (Add "N" to model No.) MODEL LE 1030 This "GO-NO-GO" continuous monitoring PRESSURE LINE or AREA monitor is designed for wall mounting or as a hand held portable. SERIES 1000 COMPARISON CHART FEATURES 1010 1020 1030 Electro Chemical Sensor Cell X X X Reverse Flow Control X X X "Cell Saver" Circuit X -- -- Digital Readout in PPM X X ~ Recorder Output X -- -- Adjustable Audio/Visual X X X Alarms w/Mute Control Adiustable Span Control X X ~ Zero Control Protection Auto. Manual -- Latching Auxiliary X -- -- w/Override & Reset STANDARD FEATURES: -- an adjustable AUDIO/VISUAL ALARM is capable of being PRESET to any desired alarm condition from 0 to 500 ppm -- a green, toggle switch controlled, LED indicates power "ON" -- a red LED alarm light and toggle "mute" switch for the AUDIO ALARM -- a 12V DC operated standard version, designed for LOW PRESSURE air line or AREA monitoring. An AC adaptor is provided as standard equipment. Dimensions: 4.8" H X 2.1" D X 3.8" W Weight: 1.5 lbs. Models: LE 1030/LP.- Low pressure air line monitor LE 1030/Arab. -- Ambient (area) air monitor LE 1030/H.P. -- Designates monitor with external high pressure adaptor kit. FEA'rU R ES 1010 1020 1030 Auxiliary Relay w/Override -- X -- Metal Case EnclosUre X X X RFI/EMI Protection X X X Inlet Filter, 5 Micron X X X Air Flow Control Auto. Manual Manual w/lndica- w/flow w/flow tor eye meter meter Pressure Une monitoring X X X Ambient Air Monitoring Option Option Option OPTIONS: · Weatherproof or explosion proof NEMA Case · Companion Span Gas Module · Remote Modular Alarm Strobe/92 db c/o 10 ft. audio alarm w/Mute Switch · Calibration Kit OPTIONS: · GARAGE · PAINT ROOM · STORAGE ROOM · PARKING STRUCTURE Weatherproof or Explosion proof wall mount, NEMA enclosures with window. A Modular Strobe/92db audio wall mounted alarm. It is activated by the "Auxiliary Relay" contacts and has an audio "mute" switch, Calibration/Span Gas Kit: The kit contains two 17 liter cylinders of CO span gas with flow control valve and pressure regulator, hose and attachment. A high impact resistant box holds the components. A companion Span Gas Module for rack/panel mount models. This module allows the span gas container to fit flush with the monitor face. It is inserted from the front of the panel. -...- _ ELECTRONICS P.O. Box 10069, Torrance, CA 90505 Distributed by: AMERICAN BRIST0- '.ND., INC, 1600 W. 240th ST. HARBOR CITY, CA 50710 (2.Z.3) 534-~ S921 LIGHTNING E;LE; CTR ONICS SPECIFICATION LIGHTNING ELECTRONICS DEWPOINT MONITOR - MODEL LE1510 Description The model LE1510 electronic dewpoint monitor will accurately determine the moisture content of most compressed gases. The monitor has a "warning" indicator and an "alarm" indicator/relay, both of which are adjustable. When used in a respiratory air system, the "warning" could be set to give an indication that purification chemicals will soon' require changing and the "alarm" set to shut the compressor off and indicate chemical cartridge change is required. An "OVERRIDE" switch is provided to bypass the relay. Push the "MUTE" switch to silence the Audio Alarm. RANGE PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION CALIBRATION POWER INPUT FITTING FLOW INPUT PRESSURE -100°F to _+50? (Dewpoint) ! resistance cell Fixed resistance equivalent 110-125V A.C., 50-60 Hz./12 VDC 1/4" NPT Female 0 to 50 SCFM 0 to 5000 PSI Minimum De~ectable: Dewpoint Change ................................... Rise Time 95% ................................ Fall Time 95% ................................ · ' · Zero Drift ..............; ........................ · -. Precision ...................................... . ' , - Accuracy " - .- Operating Temperatu.~.e.R.ange .......... · - Linearity "' Dimensions :" ':.'::, "' .' · Weight (A@proximate) A...~...~ .... ~ ...... 2°F 2-3 seconds 2~3 seconds +1% per day +2% (Full Scale) · 2% (Full Scale) 0°C to 40°C +1% (Full Scale) ' 2 3/4"W x 5-1/8"H x 6"D. 5-? lbs. E/ectr/c Company, Inc. COMPARE THE BENEFITS THE LIMA MA.~~~ ALTERNATORS OFFER YOU · No adjustments or controls, inherently self regulated · Minimum maintenance - no knobs, co,"~/'Ol circuits, current transformers or electronics to adjust or maintain · The "Hands-off" alternator · Experience in electronic controls not required by operating personnel · Automatic 500% shnrt circuit support .- · I HP/J(W code G motor starring capabi7iTi'es tented Brushless Exciter with 3 Phase tu~/ wave rectification 2.2 Bearing Pre-/ubricated for life minimum B-10 fife rating of 100,000 hours 2.4 Single piece rotor construction for maximum mechanical strength 2.3 Stator armature with class F insulation operating at class B temperature for long life Rugged frame construction 2.7 For more information, call your representative or 419.227.7327 Available ~ing/E bearing or'2 bearing for all popular'prime movers LIMA BRUSHLESS, SELF EXCITED, INHERENTLY (SELF) REGULATED TYPE MAC ALTERNATORS 1. GENERAL 1.1 The alternator shall be manufactured in the United States of America, and shall be a Lima Electric Co., Inc. Type MAC, Self Excited, Inherently (self) Voltage Regulated, Salient 4 pole (1800'1500 RPM), brushless, synchronous alternator continuous rated__ KVA, ~ KW, 80 degrees C rise over a maximum ambient temperature of 55 degrees C. 1.2 The unit shall be of the (select one of the following) 1.2.1 Single bearing type with a flexible disc type coupling rigidly bolted to the alternator shaft. 1.2.2 Two bearing construction with drive end bearing and keyed drive end shaft extension adequately sized for belt driving the unit's full rated Icad. ALTERNATOR DESIGN FEATURES. The alternator stator shall be Class "F" insulated with the windings designed for an output of three phase, ~ Hertz, ; Volts 10;12 wire reconnectable and shall have a minimum continuous rating of~ KVA,~ KW, 0.8 power factor lagging as defined by NEMA MG 1-22.40. 2.2 2.3 2.4 Excitation shall be provided by a brushless rotating-current-transformer frequency converter type exciter. The phase wound exciter stator shall be designed such that Icad current will directly control the level of excitation supplied to the main revolving field. The output of the three phase rotating exciter armature shall be directly connected to a six element, three phase. full wave rotating rectifier bridge assembly containing hermetically sealed silicon rectifiers (diodes) mounted on adequately sized heat sinks. The rotating bridge assembly shall be mounted on a hub on the alternator's shaft - adjacent to the exciter rotor and readily accessible for inspection and maintenance. No additional current transformers, resistors, diodes or other forms of semi-conductors may be used to control or regulate the output voltage of the alternator. The rotating field shall be salient pole with single piece laminations. The field windings shall be wound with enameled magnet wire using "wet wound" in-place process with "Class H" thixotrophic heat reactive epoxy. Bearings shall be single width, double shielded type ball bearings prelubricated for the life of the bearings, and shall have a minimum "B-10" life of 100,000 hours. The bearing fit on the shaft shall be ground to tolerance. 2.5 2.6 The bearing carrier (bearing bracket) of single bearing umts shall be designed to allow axial bearing "float", but shall have provisions to limit rotation of the bearing's outer race. In addition, the bearing carrier shall incorporate a covered access hole to facilitate use of a hand tachometer to varify rotative speed. The entire rotating assembly shall be dynamically balanced to less than two mils - peak to peak - displacement, and designed to w~thstand a minimum overspeed of 125% of rated RPM for 15 minutes without damage. The alternator shaft shall be sufficiently rigid to avoid inluruous torsional vibrations. The torsional analysis necessary to assure torsional comparability with the driving engine shall be conducted by the engine manufacturer. 2.7 The alternator frame shall be of h~gh quality single piece construction, either cast aluminum, or fabricated steel weldment. with all turned surfaces machined from a single setup to assure concentricity. Using the "engine ring" mating surface as a referent, the alienator feet shall be milled to assure parallelism with the axis of rotation. and proper centerline height. ~.~ 3. ALTERNATOR P~,RFORMANCE. 3.1 The alternator shall exhib, it 4% voyage regulation. Voltage regulation is defi'o,,ed a~S/(he band width within which the output volta-"0~ shall be maintained at any load from no Icad to rated Icad, rated power factor; with the unit operating at a constant speed, and after transients due to Icad change have decayed to zero. The alternator output voltage shall exhibit a "Volts per Hertz" characteristic through a minimum speed range of 60% to 125% of the unit's rated synchronous speed. 3.2 With the alternator operating under a no Icad condition at rated speed, rated voltage, the sudden one step application of a Icad equal to full continuous duty rated Icad at rated power factor shall not cause a transient voltage dip of more than 10% as measured by light beam oscillograph. 3.3 The alternator shall be of the type that provides superior three phase induction motor starting performance. It shall be capable of starting - directly across the line - a three phase NEMA starting Code "G" induction motor load equivalent to one (1) horsepower per kilowatt (KW) of the alternator's nameplate rating. In addition, the alternator shall facilitate fault clearing by being capable of sustaining fault currents in excess of 500% of its full load current rating per 10 seconds. The Lima Electric Company, Inc. P.O. Box 918 Lima, Ohio 45802 (419) 227-7327 TELEX 242433 360/361 DRIPPROOF A.C. GENERATOR DIMENSION SHEET TWO BEARING- STD. FEET . THE LIMA ELECTRIC CO., INC, P.O. BOX 918 LIMA, OHiO 45802 (419) 227-7327 ,8¼ Key-- Dia. i 17~- 9 Max. , ~ Dia. 4 Holes Certified Correct For: Customer Order No. LiMA Order No. Date By 36-1 Lima MAC 4-POLE, 60 HERTZ SPECIFICATIONS: 1800 RPM, 40°C Ambient, Class F/H Insulation Model Number 3 Phase I Phase 10 Lead 12 Lead(:[:) 0.8 Power Factor 1.0 Power Factor 120/208V Standard Continuous Continuous 139/240V - 240/416V Wye Frame Voltage Duty kW Duty kW List 277/480V Wye 120/240V Delta Size Regulator 80°C R/R 105°C R/R(:[) Price 250M1237 250M1235 250 Not Required 5 5 $1,640 250M1238 250M1236 250 Not Required 7.5 7.5 1,870 280M0054 280M0079 280 Not Required 10 10 2.050 280M0055 280M0080 280 Not Required 12 12 2.175 280M0056 280M0081 280 Not Req uirec] 15 15 2,475 360M0057 360M0082 360 Not Required 20 20 3,135 360M0058 360M0083 360 Not Required 25 25 3,560 360M0059 360M0084 360 Not Required 30 30 3,775 360M0060 360M0085 360 Not Required 40 40 4,055 440M0885 440M0860 440 Not Required 50 50 4,980 440M0886 440M0861 440 Not Required 60 60 5,345 440M0887 440M0862 440 Not Required 75 75 6,450 440M0888 440M0863 440 Not Required 100 100 7,490 580M0889 580 Not Required 125 8,040 580M1166 Not 580 Not Required 150 Not 8,790 580M0891 Available 580 Not Required 175 Available 10,030 580M0892 580 Not Required 200 11,415 680M0893 Not 680 Not Required 250 Not 12,340 680M0894 Available 680 Not Required 300 Availal:)le 13,210 (:D 12 wire units only, 120V Delta, 120/240V Zigzag, 480V Zigzag. I PHASE, ZIGZAG 60 HERTZ SPECIFICATIONS: 1800 RPM, 40°C Ambient, 1 Phase, 0.8 Power Factor, Class F/H Insulation, 4 Lead, 120V Parallel Connection, 120/240V Zigzag. Number Frame Model Number ol Leads Size 250M1185 4 250 250M 1152 4 250 (:D 12 wire units only, 120V Delta, 120/240V Zigzag, 480V Zigzag. ~:) a. Lima MAC generators are specifically designed for starting 3 phase AC electric motors. MAC generators provide I hp per kW Code "G" induction motor starting ca13ability with max. 36% voltage dip (80°C rise rating). b. All models are single bearing units and pricing includes flexible drive discs and SAE adapter. Pricing also applies to two bearing generators. c. Connection Box: 250 Frame MAC generators are designed with 8x8 inch cast connection box integral with frame. 280 Frame MAC generators are provided with horizontally split clamshell style connection box on generator F1 side. 360 through 580 MAC generators are complete with saddle type connection box. Standard Continuous Voltage Duty kW List Regulator 105° C R/R Prica Not Required 5 $1,605 Not Required 7.5 1,835 d. MAC generators are self-excited, inherently-regulated providing _4% voltage regulation without external voltage regulator or transformers. e. Automatic 500% short circuit support. f. Automatic volts/hertz operation. g. 80°C and 105°C ratings are based upon NEMA. Reduced operating costs With an Allison Automatic there is no engine-disconnect clutch; a torque converter provides a much smoother, more efficient transfer of power. Allison Automatics eliminate the erratic torque oscillations that occur during manual shifting. Hun- dreds of these shifts, day after day, can eventually result in damage to the driveline and engine related components. In addition, the Allison Automatic can virtually eliminate the kind of driver miscalculation, or abuse, that often ends in costly driveline repairs. On the average, we have found that trucks equipped with manuals incur twice the total amount of maintenance and repair costs as trucks equipped with automatics. These costs include such things as clutch replacements and adjust- ment, preventive maintenance, and repairs to the engine and driveline necessitated by lugging and shock. It has also been found that the smooth, controlled shifting of the automatic reduces the vibration which can be damaging to cabs, bodies, electrical systems and accessories. When you specify an Allison Automatic, your trucks spend less time in the shop and more time on the road. Productivity In today's competitive world, vehicle productivity can be a vital factor in your business. An Allison Automatic can boost productivity by eliminating the distracting and fatiguing work of clutching and shifting. The physical work of operating a manual trans- mission can eventually diminish a driver's dexterity and timing- especially under conditions that require a lot of shifting such as hilly terrain or stop-and-go city streets. With an Allison Automatic, your drivers don't waste time clutching and shifting. Instead, they get quick, full-power shifts that can cut accel- eration time and overall trip time appreciably And shifts are just as smooth and properly timed at the end of the route as at the beginning. This means your truck or fleet can get more work done every day Tests have revealed that average- skilled drivers were approximately 150/o more productive driving an Allison Automatic-equipped vehicle than when driving one that was equipped with a manual. With both hands on the wheel and eyes on the road, a driver is in better command of every driving situation and can maneuver his truck to take advan- tage of traffic or terrain conditions. With the Allison Automatic, you get not only increased vehicle produc- tivity but increased driver alertness. Another important benefit is that it takes less time to learn to drive an automatic-equipped vehicle and less experience to realize the full performance and economy poten- tial of the engine. Driveability In all normal driving situations, the pressure of the driver's foot on the accelerator pedal controls the auto- matic shifts in the transmission providing the performance desired- automatically When the accelerator is depressed to full throttle, the transmission will automatically up- shift at a speed just below maximum governed engine speed. With less pedal pressure, the transmission will upshift at a lower engine speed. Automatic selection of the best gear ratio for part-throttle performance, as well as fuel economy, is assured. For added control, the driver can move the control lever to a lower range position. This permits him to restrict upshifts, matching power and speed to meet special road, load and traffic conditions. For example, the driver may wish to keep the transmission from upshift- ing to high range in stop-and-go traffic. To do so, he simply selects the next lower range. Shifting in all lower ranges remains the same. The lower ranges also give com- plete vehicle control through engine braking on downgrades. The driver simply places the selector lever in one of the lower ranges in order to maintain a safe speed in descending a grade. The transmission will then downshift only when it is safe to do so, preventing excessive engine overspeeding. The automatic trans- mission is easier on the driver... yet he's always in total command. Think about these performance benefits and how they can help you. In today's tougher world, an Allison Automatic may just give you the competitive advantage you need. Built to perform, built to endure... Allison Automatics We produce a complete line of Allison Automatic transmissions suitable for virtually all truck appli- cations in the medium and heavy duty range. Each series reflects an array of high tech- nology design features and our serious commitment to exacting and unyielding cluality standards. Torque converter the most efficient way to transmit engine torque. The converter's ability to multiply engine torque provides an infinite number of ratios to get a load started smoothly and quickly--free from lugging and stal- ling. The converter allows Allison Auto- matics to match or exceed the performance of multi-speed manual transmissions and also provides a fluid coupling to reduce driveline shock. Planetary gearing achieves various amounts of reduction by cou- pling together or holding stationary selected elements of the system-the sun gear, ring gear or planet gear carrier. Requiring no internal adjustments, it provides a completely balanced torque load and uninterrupted power flow to the drive wheels-clearly superior to the manual transmission with gears that slide in and out of mesh to achieve various gear ratios. The constant mesh feature of the Allison Automatics combines with hydraulic clutches to provide fast, full-power shifts. And by coupling this compact, fast acting planetary gear section to the torque converter, you get ideal power transmittal to start a load and keep it moving under absolute control. Multiple disc clutches hydraulically actuated to engage the proper gear ratio. Since they are self-compensating for wear, no internal adjustments are necessary. Clutch plates use specially selected state-of-the-art friction material with increased torque carrying capability and excellent wear characteristics, while they provide smooth gear changes under the most adverse conditions. Hydraulic control system the "brain" of the transmission. It makes the transmission "automatic." It's here that speed, · load and road conditions are instantly translated to the proper clutch action and required gear ratios. This "sensing and computing action" is con- tinuous and provides a far more accurate balance of engine supply and load demand than most drivers could do manually Special features Lockup clutch PTO provision Lockup clutch for added performance and operating efficiency MT600 and HT 700 Series transmissions feature an automatic lockup clutch in the higher gear ranges. The lockup clutch improves efficiency by creating a direct mechanical link, from the engine through the transmission, to the drive wheels. This feature provides optimum fuel economy because there is no power loss or "slippage" in the torque converter. Power takeoff provisions to drive auxiliary equipment. Allison Automatics can supply power through a selection of PTO locations. Converter-driven power takeoff drive gears are available on all series transmissions. Engine-driven power takeoff drive gears are optional on the HT 700 Series. With the converter driven power takeoff, loads can be smoothly started, inched, held, raised or lowered by throttle action alone. Torque converter smoothness and flexibility protect the driven equipment from sudden shock. For applications such as crash and pump trucks, the HT700 Series offers an engine driven PTO for constant speed. The Allison retarders provide a storehouse of braking power available through- out the gear ranges to make downhill runs faster and safer, while significantly reducing the wear on vehicle service brakes. A driver can apply just the right amount of braking power with the retarder to meet grade and load conditions with no wheel lockup on icy or slippery roads. The highly controllable braking force over the entire speed range gives .*~-~ drivers a new feeling of confidence while helping to reduce · ~ trip times and increase vehicle productivity. Allison integral retarder (available on HT 700 Series transmissions) Small, light- weight and powerful-an integral part of the'transmission with no added external lines or remote components. The " {~ hydraulic design concept of the Allison integral retarder has been proved over the years in heavy duty applications such as deep pit mining, logging and construction. This rugged fluid power device adds only 4 inches to the length of the transmission yet is capable of absorbing over 400 braking horsepower. Allison output retarder The Allison Output Retarder is a proven combination of hydrodynamic and multi-disc braking, providing effective braking force without the necessity of using the service brakes. The hydrodynamic braking section is particularly effective at high speeds. As the vehicle slows down, the multi-disc brake comes into operation, supplementing the hydro- dynamic braking smoothly and effectively .... The retarder is mounted on the rear of the transmission, /l~P~'~ '"~ transmitting its braking force directly to the driveshaff. This helps prevent wear because the retardation power is not ~ re ~"~ transmiffed through the planetary gear section. Quiet, lightweight and inexpensive, the retarder can be Allison output .,..~,~..J operated with either hand or foot controls. I I I ! i i I ! Our co.rnmitment to qual,ty The intensive effort at Detroit Diesel Allison to produce transmissions of the highest quality starts with a plan that clearly defines the responsibilities of everyone involved in the pro- duction of these transmissions. The extraordi- nary way we build and test transmissions may be a glance into the future for other manufac- turers. But for us, the future is now. High quality is maintained by keeping the human factor in the parts making process. Machine operators inspect all the parts they make. Some of the more critical components undergo a second 100% inspection. Every bore of every valve body is tested for accuracy to within .0001 in. tolerance. Precise, uniform bores enable the valve body to accurately interpret speed and load signals, for sure shifts at the proper moment. Some assembly processes are best handled by people. So to assure that these pre- selected gears find their way into the right carrier assembly, they are hand-assembled. A high level of efficiency is maintained on the production line by a system of job task rotation, controlled by the line workers them- selves. This progressive system effectively com- bats the tedium of assembly line work, while increasing productivity. In addition, modular component assemblies are designed for error- less installation on the line, with the added benefit of easier servicing later. 4 Every transmission goes through a series of 55 functional checks. Should a transmission fail some test, the nature and general area of the problem are recorded, the transmission re- worked, and then retested. All transmissions are pressure-tested in a dip tank for leaks from improper sealing or seating of componentry. At the same time, ferrous metals are coated with a corrosion inhibitor. Allison Automatics now available with - ATEC Allison Transmission Electronic Control (ATEC) is the most significant design advancement in the history of Allison transmissions. This latest achievement in electronic technology makes Allison Automatic transmissions more efficient, more versatile and more reliable than ever before. ATEC provides the following benefits: Increased Vehicle Flexibility The electronic control unit contains a removable programmable read only memory (PROM) chip which contains all control logic for transmission shift control. The PROM chip allows flexibility in tailoring a vehicle shift schedule to dif- ferent type operations. Should your vehicle operating conditions and/or engine horsepower levels change, PROM updates can be incorporated without expensive valve body modifications. Improved Shift Control With ATEC, shifting is more accurate and responsive than with conventional hydraulic controls. Shift point tolerances are greatly reduced due to the increased accuracy of the electronic system. This precise shift control allows many advantages in setting up flexible shift schedules and allows greater sen- sitivity to ddving conditions. Improved Fuel Economy The more precise shift point control available through ATEC allows signifi- cantly more flexibility for implementing fuel-optimized shift curves. ATEC, due to increased shift point accuracy, can allow more frequent operation in higher lockup ranges. Customer fuel economy res~Jlts comparing ATEC versus hydraulic controls in stop/start city appli- cations have shown up to 7% gains. Improved Performance. The more precise shift point control allowable with ATEC can provide opti- mum performance benefits. For vehi- cles requiring full throttle performance, ATEC allows extended shift points for more efficient use of the engine~ torque curve. Reduced Maintenance Costs ATEC reduces maintenance costs in a vadety of ways. The service diagnostic feature provides early problem detec- tion, system diagnosis and more simpli- fied troubleshooting. Potential problems can be resolved before they become more sedous. Maintenance is also reduced by eliminating many mechani- cal system components. Early Problem Detection and Diagnosis Through space-age technology, the ECU continually monitors the transmis- sion and ATEC component functions as part of the ATEC service diagnostic sys- tem. Thirty-one critical functions such as oil temperature, oil level/pressure and clutch pressures are under surveil- lance to provide continuous protection for the transmission. The ECU even monitors performance of the ATEC sys- tem components. Reduced and Simplified Troubleshooting ATEC is service friendly by providing easier diagnosis and troubleshooting. Easily obtainable diagnostic codes specify malfunction areas in the trans- mission and ATEC system components. Simplified "troubleshooting" procedures walk technicians step-by-step to the problem component with the use of only a volt ohmmeter. i t 1 1 ] I 1 I I t I 1 Allison Automatics Specifications Output Net Input Input Net Input Models Retarder ATEC Power (max) Speed (RPM) Torque (max) AT Series AT 545 235 hp g: 3200-4000 425 lb. ft. (175 kW) d: 2400-3200 (576 N.m) MT Series ~ ' ~..~ 250 hp g: 2200-4000 625 lb. ft. (186 kW) d: 2200-4400 (847 N-m) MTB 643 Yes 250 hp g: 2200-4000 625 lb. ft. (186 kW) d: 2200-4000 (847 N.m) MT 647 250 hp 2000-3000 780 lb. ft. (186 kW) (1058 N.m) MTB 647 Yes 250 hp 2000-3000 780 lb. ft. (186 kW) (1058 N.m) MT 648 Yes 250 hp 2OO0-3000 780 lb. ft. (186 kW) (1058 N.m) MTB 648 Yes Yes 250 hp 2000-3000 780 lb. ft. (186 kW) (1058 N.m) MT 653DR 250 hp g: 2200-4000 625 lb. ft. (186 kW) d: 2200-4000 (647 N.rn) MTB 653DR Yes 250 hp 1800-3000 625 lb. ft. (186 kW) (847 N.m) MT 654CR 300 hp 1800-3000 950 lb. ft. (224 kW) (1288 N-m) MTB 654CR Yes 300 hp 1800-3000 950 lb. ft. (224 kW) (1288 N,m) HT Series HT 740 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) HT 741 Yes 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) HTB 741 Yes Yes 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N.m) HT 747 365 hp 1900-2800 1100 lb. ft. (272 kW) (1491 N,m) HT 748 Yes 365 hp 1900-2800 1100 lb. ft. (272 kW) (1491 N.m) HTB 748 Yes Yes 365 hp 1900-2800 1100 lb. ft. (272 kW) (1491 N,m) HT 7500R 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N,m) HT 754CR 445 hp 1900-2100 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) HT 755CR Yes 445 hp 1900-2100 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N,rn) HTB 755CR Yes Yes 445 hp 1900-2100 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) HT 755DR Yes 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) HTB 755DR Yes Yes 445 hp 1900-2400 1300 lb. ft. (322 kW) (1763 N-m) V Series v 730 275 hp 2100-2600 840 lb. ft. (205 kW) (1140 N.m) V 731 Yes 275 hp 2100-2600 840 lb. ft. (205 kW) (1140 N,m) Capacity (max) 30,000 lbs. (13,600 kg) GVW/GCW 73,280 lbs. (33,240 kg) GVW/GCW 73,28O ~bs. (33,240 kg) GVW/GCW 55,0OO ~bs. (24,945 kg) GVW/GCW 55,000 lbs. (24,945 kg) GVW/GCW 55,000 lbs. (24,945 kg) GVW/GCW 55,000 lbs. (24,945 kg) GVW/GCW 73,28o ~bs. (33,240 kg) GVW/GCW 73,28O ~bs. (33,240 kg) GVW/GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW/GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW/GCW 80,0OO lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 60,000 lbs. (27,216 kg) GVW/GCW 60,000 lbs. (27,216 kg) GVW/GCW 60,000 lbs. (27,216 kg) GVW/GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58, 967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 ~bs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 80,000 lbs. (36,287 kg) GVW 130,000 lbs. (58,967 kg) GCW 40,000 lbs. (18,140 kg) GVW 40,000 lbs. (18,140 kg) GVW A worldwide service network backs the Allison Automati s. The ba.ckbo.ne o.f our .pr. od. uct. rehabdt® parts We train service suppot[ sys[em ~s a g~oDa~ ne[- t~nhni~_i~rl_~ work of almost 5000 Detroit reliabilt® products, available through ........... ~i~,~l Alllatin cliefrihl~fnre ~nci Detroit Diesel Allison distributors and The finest trainin centers in the ............................... deal r ' ' g dealers This vast network nuts e s, g~ve you top quahty replace- industry are operated by Detroit tr~in'-a ~,~,-h~n;~-o n~,~o ,',~r ment parts at far less cost than new Diesel Allison and its distributor ..... ~ ,,..,4 ,~,,. ~,,,..~., .......... co po ants. The reliabilt® name means orgamzatlon. Classroom instrucbon ~., ,~,~, ,-,,u ,,.,.~ .,-,~o, o~, v,~,~ these parts are remanufactured under covers complete transmission ser- e. ,q,.ulpm.en! wlth!.n easy reach of the dgid control and continuously vice and repair, including overhauls. Amson Automa[ic users. updated engineering specifications To assure that service training is of Detroit Diesel Allison. A full six readily available in your area, ......... month warranty backs up both new Detroit Diesel Allison distributors avallaDIiizy and reliabilt® parts. can arrange for complete training · for operators and maintenance A completely computerized, auto- mated parts distribution system personnel. stands ready to serve the needs of Warranty Allison Automatic _~- . r ~ ~--~ ' -- ~ ' ' users. The central .... - ..... coverage parts warehouse ,~,~' ~ r~ ~iit ~...~, ~ ~!allll~~ ~--.-~.~ , ....--T Warranty coverage in Romulus, Michi- ;'""~"~: -: "~ i: !L,7_;..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~. ~ ~ ..._~i~11~' .~-.~~_'~.-.~T_~ by Detroit Diesel gan, is linked direct- ;.~ 1~_- '~ ~ ....~ {"t.~,~11 '~;~- '~,-' ~i~.~ - ' ' Allison provides ly ,v,a,co..m, pu. ter ...=.:~_..~, ;~ ,.'I.~':~=;,: i:.ll~l-;. r]~-J~;~l-l~ . .. '; ~; hberal protect,on with o siriDutors ---: ~ ;~. ~;i :,, :.? · ' ~ ~_~ 7 ' - fnr ~v~r'~ f~,tnr~ throughout the -rm' "' l.I' '-i:{"~';i! - .... ~ -- ~-~'~ ~-" D'~'o~l~:ti"o'~'~'~'t' U.S. andCanada. . m.~,,;'"~;? '.~i~.~ '~!! ~ r ;' ~_....,'~'?'/ ~ We have a fast Emergency corn- .~.~ ._,;,~.., ; ! -I~ ! ~,. ~.~ ~r ,.,,.___ ' ~.~ efficient system puterlinkupsare [i'~ ~-~,....~ - ..~!~. ~.~! j[~ ~c~.~ J , ~ handling warranty _malntaln.edt.o ... ,,,,~, " ~k/ ~ J~ '~' claims. Distributors ~urope, ^uszra~a ','{ :.-.~ .... : ~ii~;~' . .- ~ are authorized to and South !'; · ~ : ~ .~] I,~ ~, make immediate America. You can ~ · i ~'( ~ ~ .~ warranty adjust- depend on the . ._ !' . ~=,~--- ~-X~ II~ IJ L ' ments. They are parts people at ~ -' ': .: ,~,-~,.. . '~, ~~ also author zed to DDA to have the ~ ~ ~" ~ ... ~ ~ .. ?r ' make orl-site war- pads you need and ~ - -~ [5], '"'~, r ~ -.~ _.~. ~ -~ ~ ~- .... '/ ranty repairs. Con- ,hedeliverysystem ~~. ,'==, ~i~_~_;~' ..~"~... '~ '~' ,ultyourauthorized to get them to you ----~--~ ~--.~. ~,~ ': - --. ~ DDA Service Outlet without delay. t .; ~.:,~.~.~ ~.?-~ _~.~ .... - -' for further details. General Motors Corporation P.Q Box 894, Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-0894 (317) 242-3569 SAI243B 1-87 Information and specifications subject to change without notice or obligation. LITH O IN U.S.A. 111 "LIGHT-N-AIR" ;EM:~RiG,E~CY VF=HICL~ F~'eshA~'®at the scene by AMERICAN BRISTOL AMI~RICAN IND. · MAC III is truly the ultimate in multi-pu BRISTOL ,NO ....a FreshAir® charging system plus other vital support features with the bonus of "TRI.POW:ER" -- POWERFUL, HIGH-INTENSITY FLOOD LIGHT TOWERS -- to turn night into day at the scene. Retractable telescopic towers elevate to 15 ~. Light Banks will a~iculate 180~ and rotate a full 360~ (optional) .... OPTIONAL COMPARTMENTS for B/A cylinders, hose reels, winch or oilier emergency equipment. B/A CYLINDER CHARGE CONTROLS "around the corner" from charge stations for optimum safety. EQUIPMENT COMPARTMENT -- with compressor, genera. ~ e~'~ tor, hydraulic & electric motors TWO CHARGING STATIONS -- will simultaneously charge 4 B/A cylinders with standard equipment -- more than 4 with available options. DON'T LEAVE THE STATION WITHOUT IT! [ LARGE FORWARD STORAGE COMF -- will accommodate several hose ree low pressure air. Also hydraulic or elf well as storage racks for B/A cylindai AU5 corrr~ FreshAir® STORAGE RECEIVEFIJI rated 420 SCF each -- over 50~ mediarely available. Receivers inst~ better vehicle stability. CONTROL PANEL FOR COMPRESSOR/GENERATOR & PURIFICATION SYSTEM -- in a convenient service location. Includes electronic air quality monitors. WHY "MAC II1"? Immediate response to emergencies and disasters! MAC III is designed to provide "on the scene" support for high-rise fires, "Haz-Mat" handling, power failures, floods, vehicle extrication, night and other rescue operations. WHAT IS "TRI-POWER"? The MAC III provides 3 power sources -- all from one vehicle, using only one engine: I. Hv~ .... "" ~ ~ .... ~;~ ~T~.r system, ctri .... I~, ,he ,,¢~j~.e ~[~;~_~L_~--,ae ~=t1~.%~m. II. Electric Power -- one or three phase, up to 30 KW -- plenty of electrical power for flood lights, pumps, smoke ejectors, power tools, etc. IlL Air Power -- an abundant supply of FreshAire at your command, supplied by a 5000 PSI continuous duty compressor plus an air storage system. The purity of your breathing air is guaranteed by ABI's exclusive FreshAire purification system -- a lifeline of both high pressure air for charging B/A cylinders and cascade systems, and low pressure air for con- tamination suits. Also compressed air to drive pneumatic extrication devices or other equipment. J I ! "ligl t-n-air" emergency vehicles T h and Is. as iDY CONSTRUCTION r sealed roll-up type osures. ,?IFoelVe 5000 PSI reshAir® ira- or for low CG, AMERICAN BRISTOL~S "FreshAir®" SYSTEM ... ... INNOVATION, not imitation! Switch Hitter MAC IIl's "dual-power" air compressor drive enables it to run when and where you need it. MAC III is equip- ped with a 220/440 Voit electric motor so that you can just "plug it in" at the station and charge your B/A cylinders. The hydraulic motor will drive the compressor when used "at the scene". Take Your Pick of Compressors MAC III gives you a choice of 5000 PSI continuous du- ty rated air compressor systems. Compare these specifications and decide which one is best for your needs. The Model 25 can directly charge a 30-minute cylinder in less than 21/2 minutes. The Model 36 can directly charge a 30-minute cylinder in 11/= minutes. The Model 50 can directly charge a 300 SCF Cascade cylinder in 7 minutes. Ask us about larger or dual systems. FreshAir® -- The Purest Available The "FreshAir® "line of American Bristol Purification Systems was developed to achieve the complete removal of all harmful contaminants. Air purity exceeds all recognized respiratory air standards set by U.S. Navy, Compressed Gas Association, the National Fire Protec- tion Association and O.S.H.A. "FreshAir® "Purification Systems are SAFE, DEPENDABLE, EASILY MAINTAIN- ED and are the MOST MODERN and EFFICIENT systems available. WIDE RANGE OF 18,000 to 40,000 LB. GVW CHASSIS CHOICES · Higl~er GVW accommodates larger compressor & generator · More options of engines & transmissions · Modular body designs offer re-chassis capability · More room for emergency equipment Safety First Stainless steel safety gauges monitor the quantity of air available from compressor and storage systems. A check valve prevents stored air from re-entering the purification system, while an automatic sequence valve controls the air to and from the storage system. Air delivered to the B/A cylinders is measured by a large, precision, stainless steel safety gauge. The cylinders are automatically charged to any pre-selected pressure. Charging is controlled by soft-seated shut-off valves. Safety relief valves prevent inadvertent over-charging of cylinders. The charging controls are placed in a safe location to protect the operator in the event of a cylinder failure. An optional automatic pushbutton charge system is also available, The cooling/fragmentation deflector tanks are constructed with one-quarter-inch, hot-dipped galvanized steel. Four cylinders (more if desired) may be filled simultaneously through rigidly mounted "SAFE- TY" charge adaptors, which do not require safety restraints. This unique feature makes cylinder charg- ing easier, safer and faster. p-,r~ ~__~_,:..~_~ c,. III uses the same engine that gets you "to the scene" to power the hydraulic system that drives the compressor, the generator, and any other hydraulically driven auxiliary equipment -- and all at the same time. 1. Dependable -- upon arrival at the scene, all three power sources are ready -- no auxiliary engines to start. 2. Safer- no secondary fuel system to service or maintain -- eliminates a potential fire hazard, and a second source of carbon monoxide. 3. Lower Maintenance -- the hydraulic system is seal- ed and has no carburetors to adjust or "tune-ups" to perform. The hydraulic motors which drive the compressor and generator are less expensive and easier to maintain than a comparable gasoline or diesel engine. 4. Smaller Size -- the hydraulic components take up less room than a comparable gasoline or diesel engine and allow more room for storage of emergen- cy equipment. 5. Load Matched -- an exclusive hydraulic control system allows loads to be added or dropped without pressure surges or fluctuations. Hydraulic pump damage from engine overspeeding is thus avoided. 6. Separate Cooling System -- the hydraulic fluid cool- ing system is totally independent from the chassis system, with its own heat exchanger and automatic fan. · Compressore up to 40 CFM Low pressure breathing air outlet panel w/ · Extra compartments for reels, emergency · Generatore up to 30 KW quick disconnects equipment and B/A cylinder storage · Hose reels for both higt~ and low pressure air · "Hi-rise" Charger Kit for B/A cylinders · Communciations equipment · Cord reels for remote electrical power · High-intensity Quartz/Sodium flood lights · Warning lights, sirens, winches, etc. · Hydraulic hose reels for remote operation · Hydraulic, air & manually operated flood light · Extrication systems of tools towers MAC III DIMENSIONS _ 12' 90-95" 1 ' ............ ; ~ ~ 00'~0 DESIGNING YOUR MAC III ... AS SIMPLE AS 1-2-3! 1. CAB AND CHASSIS All commercial and custom makes available. Wheel base and cab-to-axle dimension to match body and equipment. 18,000 to 40,000 lb. GVW ratings. 2. BODY All aluminum construction with heavy ex- truded structural frame and body sec- tions. Diamond plate roof, floor, rear bumper and body corner shields. Weather sealed aluminum roll-up type compart- ment closures. B/A cylinder racks as required. 3. EQUIPMENT Select compressor and generator size, air storage volume and other equipment op- tions, We'll provide budget pdces for plan- ning ... ... or tell us your specific requirements and we will custom design your MAC III, complete with procurement specifications and blueprints. also available from AMERICAN BRISTOL ... MAC II A 2-1n-1 Emergency Vehicle, providing FreshAir~ and emergency electrical power. a compact, 10,000 GVW unit with many of the MAC III features. The same reliable engineering, but at a more modest cost. Contact us for details. AM~I~IIrAN BRISTO/ INC:3. American Bristol 1600 W. 240th Street Harbor City, California 90710 PRINTED IN USA (213) 534-598 t JULY 85 i I I I I I i AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. MAC Ill PTO ELECTRIC SYSTEM 1. POWER TRAIN Fig. 3A illustrates, schematically, the functional operation of the ABI-supplied Power Trair~ Chemical energy (fuel) is converted to electrical energy through the diesel or gasoline engine/transmission/pawer-take off/U-]oint drive/right angle gear box/ coupling to the A.C. alternator. The A.C. power then drives the motor driven air . compressor assembly. BASIC A.C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM The Fig. 3B functional schematic, illustrates MAC l~s ability to energize the compressor from either a "In-House" electrical outlet, or from the "On-Board" A.C. alternator. The Selector S~vitch directs the pawer from the source to the magnetic starter/motor/ compressor assembly. A safety switch prevents starting the truck engine ~vhile "in-house" po~ver is engaged. PNEUMATIC SUB-SYSTEM Fig. 3£ illustrates the basic companents of the on-board Pneumatic System. There are numerous electrical and mechanical safety features and controls that ~vill shut-down the system in the event of an unsafe situation or condition. In addition, a computerized monitor-controller (LE5000 ) is used to monitor and control .the Complete compressor system. The operational status of the system, "normal" and "abnormal'~ are displayed on an annunciator panel /n the event any function is out of tolerance, the LE$000 ~olll "Alarm" and stop the compressor/system, and advise the "Status" and "Cause" on the annunciator panel. Accumulated operational times are recorded and displayed for all time sensitive components and/or operations. I JAB high pressure compressors are air- cooled, the cylinders and cylinder heads are located directly in the air flow of the high performance fan. This results in extreme cooling efficiency and prevents heat build-up even in the cylinder heads, as the fan diameter is larger than normal. The intercooling system is equally effectively and, as it is imme- diately behind the fan, is so efficient that the compressed air, when arriving at the intake valves of the second stage, shows a temperature of only 20°C above ambient. After the second stage, each inter- cooler or after-cooler, depending upon number of stages, is equipped with a trouble-free condensate drain which effectively removes accumulated water and water vapour and, as a result of continued good cooling, delivers final air with a temperature of only 10°C above ambient. The purging of the drain, as well as the load-free starting of the air com- pressor, is effected through an auto- matic unloading system. The separators are combined in one block to which are directly attached the safety and relief valves. A pressure holding valve, which is located after the drain of the last stage and which, at the same time, acts as a check valve, makes sure that maxi- mum condensate removal is achieved. The crankshaft is dynamically balanced so that, with the existing three-point support, almost completely vibration- free running is achieved. The main crank bearings, as well as the cylinder of the last stage, are pressure lubrica- ted. The piston pins are equipped with needle bearings. All JAB compressors have an extremely low oil consumption. This is achieved through high precision in each part and high dimensional precision in the manufacture of each part, as well as a larger number of oil control rings and pressure rings than are generally used. A fully automatic and reliable oil pressure monitoring system is installed on all high pressure compressors. Additional oil reservoirs permit an above average number of hours bet- ween oil changes and oil additic All inter-stage pressures are mor,.,,~red and adjustable and result either in alarm or shutdown of machine - this is standard equipment. Crank case and separator block can be heated. After running in and first oil charge the 4-stage machines have service intervals of 2.000 hours. For an easy identification the nomination of our com- pressors indicate with the first figure the free air deliver in I/min and with the second the maximum working pressure in bar. ABI/JAB MODEL NUMBER SPECIFICATIONS SV I10 $V 300 $V 450 SV 600 Type-Single Acting, Aircooled Direct Drive Direct Drive Direct Drive Direct Drive No. Cylinders/No. Stages 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 Max. P~e~ure · psi (bar) 5000 (350) 5000 (350) 5000 (350) 5000 (350) Speed RPM 1740 1740 1740 1740 Displacement - SCFM II /rain) 8(22 5) 16.8(475) 28(792) 32 (906) ~ Output ~ max. pressure - SCFM (t/rain) .4.6(130) 11.8(330) 17. 7(500) 22.8(644) ~ chg. rate SCFM a/rain) 5.5(156) 14.2(396) 21.3(600) 27.4(7?0) Power Req~d H.P. (KW) 5 (3.0) 15 (9.0) 15 (110) 25 Lubrication Sys. positive press. pump Crank Orive(CD) C.D.+ 4th Sta. C.D.+ 4th Sta. C.D.+ 4th Oil Sump Cap~city Pts. (l) 10 (4.7) 18 (8.5) 18 (8.5) 20 (9.5) Oil Change Interval Hrs. 1000 1500 1500 1500 Dimensions L -in. (ram) 26 (660) 46 (1170) 46 (1170) 49 (1250) (~/Motor) W - in. (mm) 18 (460) 28 (710) 28 (710) 35 (900) H - in. (mm) 19 (480) 32 (800) 32 (800) 35 (900) Weight (w/Motor) lbs. (Kg) 253 (115) 695 (315) 750 (340) 970 (440) Noise ~ 3 f~. dbs 75 85 88 95 Price: A.. Compressor/Motor A~sy. B. "A" w/Compl. Auto Controls C. "B" w/Purification System Configurotion Pur/f. Model No. "A" - Inter/After coolers w/traps, gauges and relief valves plus oil press. f~ouge and startin.q unloader/ trap drains. Electric, 60 Hz 3 t~ motor. "B" - "A" w/automatic start/stop, magnetic starter switch, /o~, oil pres~. safety switch, auto condensate droin ~'/PM valve, high temp. safety s~itch, hour meter. "C" - "B" w/complete breathing air purification indicated. Mounted/n one complete assembly. REVISIONS I I R£VI$10N$ i~. OATE D'Y NO · · .I LIMITED WARRANTY American Bristol Industries, Inc. warrants to the original purchaser of each new piece of equipment manufactured by American Bristol Industries, Inc. to be free from defects in material and workmanship ~nder prescribed use and service. During the period of the warranty, one (1) year on all mechanical parts and labor, American Bristol Industries, Inc. will repair or replace the defective part(s) or equipment which have been returned to American Bristol, transportation prepaid, and after examination of the part(s) or.equipment they are found to have been defective. The body and build up shall be guaranteed for a period of three (3)' years to be free of defects in material, design, or workmanship. American Bristol Industries, Inc. will pay its standard labor rate and standard time to install repaired or replacement parts as may be required during the warranty. This warranty shall not apply to equipment which has been · subject to misuse, negligence, 'or alteration of any kind. IN NO EVENT WII,L AMF,~C~ BRI,qTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES! AHERICkI~ BRISTOL INDUSTRIES, INC. ~600 W. 240TH STREET H~RBOR CI~Y,.C~ 907~0 ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAL CITY A TTORNEY CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DA T£ SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY JUNE 20, 1991 JULY 2, 1991 BENEFITS FOR CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDAT/ON: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the revised letter of appointment for the City Manager. DISCUSSION: On June 13, 1990, the City Council offered David Dixon the position of City Manager for the City of Temecula pursuant to the attached appointment letter. At that time, the City was desirous that Mr. Dixon move to the City and provided low interest financing and relocation expenses to accomplish that goal. Unfortunately, the present real estate market has made it impossible for Mr. Dixon to sell his house. Consequently, it is suggested that Mr. Dixon be permitted to use the relocation expenses provided for in the original letter of appointment to pay for his temporary relocation to an apartment in Temecula. In addition, there is also a variance between the benefits provided in the original appointment letter and the City's current benefit plan. At the time of the Appointment Letter, the City had no medical or life insurance plan, consequently, it was not possible to reference any specific benefits provisions in finalizing the agreement. Instead, the Appointment Letter refers to providing Mr. Dixon major medical, health, sickness, accident, and disability income programs the City provides or makes available to all executive management employees of the City. Subsequently, the City chose to provide its benefits through an Internal Revenues Code Section 125 Cafeteria Plan which provides a fix number of dollars per month which may be used to purchase a menu of benefits. However, these benefits are insufficient to provide the full list of benefits referred to in the Appointment Letter. Consequently, it is recommended that the City agree to pay for Mr. Dixon's long term disability policy separate from the Cafeteria Plan at a cost of $90.00 per month. Agenda Report - City Manager's Benefits Page 2. The attached revised Appointment Letter would address both of these issues. A TTA CHMENTS: Appointment Letter of June 13, 1990 Revised Appointment Letter FISCAL IMPACT: $1,080.00 per fiscal year 1991-1992 for Long Term Disability Policy THE FOLLOWING LETTER IS TO BE ON LETTERHEAD OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND IS TO BE SIGNED BY MAYOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, Ronald Parks. David F. Dixon 11140 Pioneer Ridge Drive Moreno Valley, CA 92388 Re: City Manager/Amended Appointment Agreement Dear Mr. Dixon: As you know, the Council is desirous that its City Manager live within the city, and included specific provisions in your letter of appointment to accomplish that goal. The Council also recognizes that the present real estate market has frustrated that goal. In addition, the Council also recognizes that the City's prevent health plan differs from what was contemplated when you were appointed The purpose of this letter addresses both of these issues by revising the terms and conditions of employment for your position. 1. Appointment - If you decide to accept this position, your appointment would become effective July 5, 1990. Your appointment will terminate on July 5, 1995; however, the City and you anticipate that this Agreement may be extended from time to time with the consent of the City and you, and according to such terms as the City and you may agree on. 2. Salarv- Your base salary will be set at $103,870.00 per year for the remainder of the fiscal year 1989-1990, and all of the fiscal year 1990-1991. Your annual base salary will be payable in installments at the same time as the other employees of the City. Commencing on July 5, 1990, the City will contribute to a deferred compensation program of your choice, a sum equal to Seven and 22/100 percent (7.22%) of your base monthly salary. 3. Retirement - The City of Temecula will execute all necessary agreements to participate in the State of California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and you will be enrolled in that program at the earliest eligible sff/LTR125279 -1- date. The employee's contribution to PERS would be paid on your behalf by the City of Temecula. 4. Vacation Leave and Sick Leave - Effective on your first day of employment with the City you will be credited with fourteen (14) days of combined vacation and sick leave. Thereafter you will accrue combined paid vacation and sick leave at the rate of 2.334 days per month during the term of your employment. You will also be eligible to receive any unused vacation leave and sick leave in cash when leaving the employment of the City. All aspects of the administration of sick leave and vacation leave will be in accordance with that which is provided to all executive management employees of the City. 5. Administrative Leave - The City will provide you with ten (10) days of administrative leave per fiscal year accumulating at a rate of 0.834 day per month. Any unused leave may be paid out to you in cash semi-annually, at your option. 6. Medical Benefits - The City will enroll you and all of your eligible dependents in the major medical, health, sickness, accident, and disability 'cafeteria" plan the City provides or makes available to all employees of the City. In addition, to the extent said cafeteria plan is insufficient to cover group medical, vision, long term disability, group dental and group term life for you and your eligible dependents, the City will purchase a long term disability insurance for you in coverage amounts comparable to the City's cafeteria plan. 7. Life Insurance - The City will provide you with term life insurance from a carrier of the City's choice in accordance with that which is provided to all executive management employees of the City. In the event that no such plan exists, the City will provide a similar plan for you substantially equal to that which is provided to employees of similar cities in the area. 8. Physical Examination - You will submit to a complete physical examination by a qualified physician selected by the City once a year. The City will pay for the cost of this physical examination and the City will receive a copy of all medical reports related to such examination. 9. Professional Development - All normal business expenses, including attendance at League of California Cities, Independent Cities Association, California Redevelopment Association, and International City Managers sff/LTR125279 -2- Association meetings and conferences, as well as local service club membership, business lunches and dinners, etc., will be paid for by the City and provided for separately in the operating budget of the City Manager's office. All other job-related seminars, training sessions, and professional dues and subscriptions will be paid for by the City and provided for separately in the operating budget of the City Manager's Office. 10. Vehicle - The City will provide you with a City vehicle for your professional and personal use, not including vacations. The City will pay for all insurance, gasoline, maintenance, and registration (exempt license plates) for this vehicle. In addition, the City will provide for regular replacement of the vehicle consistent with the depreciation policies of the City. 11. Residency - The City and you have acknowledged the desirability of your relocation to the City of Temecula. In order to secure your relocation, the City will provide you with: (A) T~w Interest Loan. The City will make available to you a housing loan. The loan, a first mortgage, will be up to 70% of the purchase price of a home within the City. The interest payments will be paid to the City on a monthly basis at a rate equivalent to the interest earned by the City's investment portfolio or some other mutually agreed upon index. The rate will be an adjustable rate, calculated on an annual basis. There will be a cap rate of three percentage points on the loan which means that the rate will not increase by more than three percentage points during the life of the loan. The loan will be due and payable within twelve (12) months of your leaving your employment with the City or when the home is no longer your primary residence, whichever occurs first. You will obtain a life insurance policy in the amount of the loan and the City will be named as the primary beneficiary in order to pay off the loan in the event of your death. You will be responsible for the cost of this policy and you will file a copy of the policy with the City. (B) Moving Expenses. The City willpay your expenses, in an amount not to exceed $4,000, for packing, moving and transporting, storing, unpacking, and insurance of your personal belongings and those of your family. Moving expenses is defined to include temporary relocation to the City for a period not to exceed ten (10) months. 12. Performance Evaluation - The Council will sff/LTR125279 -3- review and evaluate your performance at least once annually in advance of the adoption of the City's budget. This review and evaluation will be in accordance with specific criteria, goals, and performance objectives developed jointly by you and the Council. 13. Outside Activities - You will not engage in any outside activities for compensation without the prior approval of the Council. 14. Termination of Appointment; Severance - The City and you will have the right to terminate this Agreement prior to July 1, 1995 or any extensions of this Agreement, except that the City will not terminate this Agreement during the first ninety (90) days following a regular or special municipal election in which members of the Council are elected. The City may terminate this Agreement for any reason; however, should you be involuntarily terminated by the City for any reason other than conviction of an illegal act involving moral turpitude or personal gain to you, you would be provided with a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months' aggregate salary. Medical benefits and life insurance will be extended six (6) months after termination, or when replaced by another employer, whichever first occurs. You may terminate this Agreement for any reason, provided you first furnish the City with at least thirty (30) days advance notice. 15. Indemnification and Bond - The City will defend, save harmless, and indemnify you against any tort, professional liability claim or demand, or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in your performance of your duties as City Manager. This provision will not apply with respect to any intentional tort or crime which you may commit or to any punitive damages which may be assessed against you. The City will bear the full cost of a fidelity bond in the amount of $100,000.00 or any other bonds which may be required of you in the performance of your duties as City Manager. 16. Miscellaneous - Except as otherwise provided. in this Agreement, you will receive all benefits to which executive management employees of the City are entitled. In addition, the City will not at any time during the term of this Agreement reduce your salary, compensation, or other financial benefits, except to the degree the City reduces such benefits, or any portion of such benefits, for all employees of the City. sff/LTR125279 -4- This offer of employment is made with the approval and authorization of the Temecula City Council. Sincerely, ACCEPTED: Ronald Parks, Mayor of the City of Temecula. DATED: , 1991 DAVID F. DIXON sff/LTR125279 -5- Mayor 2on Parks Mayor Pro Tern Karel F. Lindemarts CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 694-1989 FAX (714) 694-1999 Councilmembers Patricia H. Birdsa' Peg Moore J. Sal Mu~oz June 13, 1990 Mr. David F. Dixon 11140 Pioneer Ridge Drive Moreno Valley, California 92388 AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER OF TEMECULA On behalf of the City Council, it is my pleasure to officially offer you the position of City Manager for the City of Temecula. It is my understanding that you are already familiar with the duties and responsibilities of the City Manager, and that you will perform all of the duties necessary to manage the City and to perform such other duties as the Council may assign from time to time. The purpose of this letter is to set forth the additional terms and conditions of employment for your position. 1. Appointment - If you decide to accept this position, your appointment would become effective luly 5, 1990. Your appointment will terminate on July 5, 1995; however, the City and you anticipate that this Agreement may be extended from time to time with the consent of the City and you, and according to such terms as the City and you may agree on. 2. Salary - Your base ~lary will be set at $103,870.00 per year for the remainder of the fiscal year 1989-1990, and all of the fiscal year 1990-1991. Your annual base salary will be payable in installments at the same time as the other employees of the City. Commencing on July 5, 1990, the City will contribute to a deferred compensation program of your choice, a sum equal to seven and 22/100 percent (7.22 %) of your base monthly salary. 3. Retirement - The City of Temecula will execute all necessary agreements to participate in the State of California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and you will be enrolled in that program at the earliest eligible date. The employee's contribution to PERS would be paid on your behalf by the City of Temecula. AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER June 13, 1990 Page No. 2 4. Vacation Leave and Sick Leave - Effective on your first day of employment with the City, you will be cred/ted with fourteen (14) days of combined vacation and sick leave. Thereafter, you will accrue combined paid vacation and sick leave at the rate of 2.334 days per month during the term of your employment. You will also be eligible to receive any unused vacation leave and sick leave in cash when leaving the employment of the City. All aspects of the administration of sick leave and vacation leave will be in accordance with that which is provided to all executive management employees of the City. 5. Administrative Leave - The City will provide you with ten (10) days of administrative leave per fiscal year accumulating at a rate of 0.834/day per month. Any unused leave may be paid out to you in cash semi-annually at your option. 6. Medical Benefits - The City will enroll you and all of your eligible dependents in the major medical, health, sickness, accident, and disability income programs the City provides or makes available to all executive management employees of the City. In the event that no such plan exists, the City will provide a similar plan for you, substantially equal to that which is provided to employees of similar cities in the area. 7. Life Insurance - The City will provide you with term life insurance from a carder of the City's choice in accordance with that which is provided to all executive management employees of the City. In the event that no such plan exists, the City will provide a similar plan for you substantially equal to that which is provided to employees of similar cities in the area. 8.' Physical EYamination - You will submit to a complete physical examination by a qualified physician selected by the City once a year. The City will pay for the cost of this physical examination and the City will receive a copy of all medical reports related to such examination. AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER lune 13, 1990 Page No. 3 9. Professional Development - All normal business expenses, including attendance at League of California Cities, Independent Cities Association, California Redevelopment Association, and International City Managers Association meetings and conferences, as well as local service club membership, business lunches and dinners, etcetera, will be paid for by the City and provided for separately in the operaling budget of the City Manager's Office. All other job-related.. seminars, training sessions, and professional dues and subscriptions will be paid for by the City and provided for separately in the operating budget of the City Manager's office. 10. Vehicle - The City will provide you with a City vehicle for your professional and personal use, not including vacations. The City will pay for all insurance, gasoline, maintenance, and registration for this vehicle. In addition, the 'City will provide for regular replacement of the vehicle consistent with the depreciation policies of the City. 11. Residency - The City and you have acknowledged the desirability of your relocation to the City of Temecula. In order to secure your relocation, the City will provide you with: (A) Low Interest Loan. The City will make avaihhle to you a housing loan. The loan, a first mortgage, will be up to 70% of the purchase price of a home within the City. The interest payments will be paid to the City on a monthly bash at a rate equivalent to the interest earned by the City investment portfolio or some other mutually agreed upon index. The rate will be an adjustable rate, calculated on an annual basis. There will be a cap rate of three percentage points on the loan which means that the rate will not increase by more than three percenlage points during the life of the loan. The loan will be due and payable within twelve (12) months of your leaving your employment with the City or when the home is no longer your primary residence, whichever occurs first. You will obtain, and keep current, a life insurance policy in the amount of the loan and the City will be named as the primary beneficiary in order to pay off the loan in the event of your death. You will be responsible for the cost of this policy and you will file a copy of the policy with the City. AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER June 13, 1990 Page No. 4 (B) Moving Expenses. The City will pay your expenses, in an amount not to exceed $4,000, for pacldng, moving and transporting, storing, unpacking, and insurance of your personal belongings and those of your family. 12. Performance Evaluation - The Council will review and evaluate your performance at least once annually in advance of the adoption of the City's budget. This review and evaluation will be in accordance with specific criteria, goals, and performance objectives developed jointly by you and the Council. 13. Outside Activities - You will not engage in any outside activities for compensation without prior approval of the Council. 14. Termination of Appointment; Severance - The City and you will ha~,e the right to terminate this Agreement prior to July 1, 1995 or any extensions of this Agreement, except that the City will not terminate this Agreement during the first ninety (90) days following a regular or special municipal election in which members of the Council are elected. The City may terminate this Agreement for any reason; however, shotfid you be involuntarily terminated by the City for any reason other than conviction of an illegal act involving moral turpitude or personal gain to you, you would be provided with a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months' aggregate salary. Medical benefits and life insurance will be extended six (6) months after termination, or when replaced by another employer, whichever first occurs. You may terminate this Agreement for any reason, provided you first furnish the City with at least thirty (30) days' advance notice. 1:5. Indemnification and Bond - The City will defend, save harmless, and indemnify you against any tort, professional liability claim or demand, or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of your duties as City Manager. This provision will not apply with respect to any intentional tort or crime which you may commit or to any punitive damages which may be assessed against you. The City will bear the full cost of a fidelity bond in the amount of $100,000.00 or any other bonds which may be required of you in the performance of your duties as City Manager. AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER June 13, 1990 Page No. 5 16. Miscellaneous - Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, you will receive all benefits to which executive management employees of the City are entitled. In addition, the City will not, at any time during the term of this Agreement, reduce your salary, compensation, or other financial benefits, except to the degree the City reduces such benefits, or any portion of such benefits, for all employees of the City. This offer of employment is made with the approval and authorization of the Temecula City Council. Sincerely, Ronald Parks Mayor Dated: , 1990 David F. Dixon RP:sjf ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager City Manager/Planning Department July 2, 1991 Approval of the General Plan Contract PREPARED BY: Gary Thornhill RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE the Contract with The Planning Center for the General Plan Program for the City of Temecula. DISCUSSION: On May lq, 1991, the City Council approved the selection of the Consultant to prepare the General Plan Program for the City of Temecula. Shortly thereafter, the Consultant ( The Planning Center) submitted the contract for review by Staff. However, because careful scrutiny of the contract is required by both Planning and City Attorney staff, in order to initiate the work program, staff authorized the Consultant to proceed under an initial authorization (not to exceed $9,999) until such time that the contract is approved by Council. The City Attorney's office has now completed their review of the contract (see attached) and recommends approval of the contract by the Council, subject to final approval by City Attorney and Planning Director as to form. GT: ks APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager City Manager/Planning Department May 1~, 1991 Selection of General Plan Consultant PREPARED BY: Gary Thornhill RECOMMENDATION: That the Council APPROVE the selection of The Planning Center as the consultant to prepare the City's General Plan and DIRECT Staff to prepare the contract for approval by the City Council. DISCUSSION: Over the past several months. the City has been soliciting requests for qualifications and reviewing requests for proposals from consultant firms and interviewing consultant firms to prepare the General Plan Program (including consistency rezoning and zoning ordinance) for the City of Temecula, A selection committee comprised of two Staff members. two Planning Commissioners, and two councilmembers reviewed all proposals and met on several occasions to interview the candidate consultant firms, After narrowing the field down to two firms, on April 18, 1991 three members of the selection committee met with the remaining two firms to make a decision, At the conclusion of the interview, the selection committee unanimously voted to recommend The Planning Center to the City Council as the recommended consultant firm, This decision was based on the experience and reputation of the firm in preparing general plans. the strength of the supporting team. references from other agencies where prior work was performed, and the proposed cost of the program. During the course of the final interview process, the selection committee negotiated the cost of the program down from the original proposal of $562,000 to $~85.000, Both firms were requested to reevaluate their proposal in an attempt to reduce the cost of the program without affecting the integrity or quality of the final product. GT: ks A:GENPLAN.SEL 3eC/AGRl13099 AGR~EMBNT FOR CONSULTAN? .SZR~!C~S THIS AGREEMENT, made arid entered into this day of , 1991, between the CITY OF TEMECULA0 a Municipal CorporaLilia, hereinafter referred to as "City" and THE PLANNING CENTER, a CalifornLa Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" WITNESSETH~ WHEREAS, C~ty desizes Lo employ a consultin9 and pl&nnin~ firm havi~9 broad and extensive pl~n~ing, consulting and d¢~ig~ capericheS to p~ovide a General Plan/Zoning Code and ~up~or/ing Environmental Impact R~port for City; and W~R=AS, Consultant has submitted a detailed personnel and lS qualified to perform the plann~n9 and design services spe~iZled herein: and WHEREAE, City demiNee t~ engage the services of Conmultmnt a~ Consultant is w~lling an~ able to ~ec~o~m the seruiceS ~esoribed herein upon the ~e~ms an4 cGnditions jec/AGRlI309~ NOW, THEREFORe, in consideration of t[%e mutual co.~enatlts and con.~iulons contained ~erelt%, it agreed by a~d b~twmmn CXL~~ and I. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Congultant ag~e~ to "Work ~zogram", a[.f. mcheG herato and inGorporated by 2, gT.~TUS OP CONSULTANT. C~nsu!tan~ is and shall at ~ii times rem~,% as to the City a wholly indepen~en[ ~ontraeto~. *Inc ~e£~o:lnei ~erf~rmi[~9 ~he s~rvices ~n0er ~hi~ a~ree~ent ~r] ~ehalf of Consultant eftall at all times be under C~:]sultanL'S ~xClustve direction and cofitrol. Neither City nor any of l%s o££tcers, employees or agents snail have conEroI over t~e conduce Of Consuita[~t or any of consulta~t's o~icers, ~:~p!uyee~ or agents, except ms herein set forth. Consu]caz%t shall not at any time or in any manae~ represen~ that it or any of its officers, employees or a~nts are in a~y manner officers, employees or agents o~ ~he City. Consulta,~t shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obli9ation or liability whatever against city, o~ bind City i~] any manner. Consultant shall not -2- j e,~/A'~Nll 309 ~f, pursuant to this Agreement without ~he prio~ w~i~en cpp~oval of 3. LEgAl, RE3PON~!LITIE3, Conmultant shall keep ~tself ~nformed of State and Federal laws and regulations w~ich may in any manna: affect those employed any way affect the performance of i~s service pursuant to t~ A~ree~e~t. Cun~ultant ~hall at all time~ o~erve ~omply wilt all $u¢~ law~ and re9uiations. Cit~, and of~¢er~ an~ ompl~yGos, shall not ~e liable at law or in equity as a result of any failuNe of Conmultant to comply with th~ ~ection. 4. COMPSNMATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. For the ~rvice~./document~ ~et forth herein and ~den~J~iec] ~n E~nibit A, Co~u~t=nt ~hmll b~ pai~ a maximum fee of Four Hundred Eighty Five Thousand E~ght Hundred Dollars invoices: The l~ol}ttliy J[lv0ice8 ~tl~11 comply, to the extent pOSSlDle, with the "Co~t ~nd Fee Schedule" attached hereto a~ Exhibit "B" ano ~mcorporated herein Oy thi~ reference. Payments ~hall b~ paid within thirty (30) day~ after receipt · peC~fy tho f~e by task, the percentage completion Of the 10134 ~ 7147~5564~ B~5 0[: 0~ ~ec/RGR,1..1309~ work, ~he allcwable LotaJ billing, the total ]nvoicea fee inciude~ the co~ of preparing all documents, out-of- pocket e~p~es of Cun~u!t~nt, ~nd th~ cost of ut~n~in~ m~in9s and workshops as identified ~n Exhibit ~. Cit}~ shall notify Consultant of any questions or disp~tes w~luh it may ~ave fegar0~g any ~volce amount with~.r~ oays after ~eceipt of the lnv~ice by City. Notwithstandi~g the foze9oing, any amounts paid City tO Consu!~ant pursuant to that certain Initial Auth~izatio{% Agr=e,:~',t Jared May ..... , 199! shall cunstitute a c[edit to City to the maximum fee charged by Consultant. 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSUL'2'A~T. Consutta~t snail not Ou compensated ~or any servicss rendered in connection with ~t~ performance of this A~reem~nt which ~n addition to those set forth herein or listed in Exhibit .~, unless such addit.~onm] services are authorized in ~dvance, in writing, by City. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional 9er~,ioe~ in thru amount~ and time Cit~'~ written autt~ori~ation i.~ g~ven to Conmultant for -4- J &C/AGRl13099 6. A~ZGNM~NT. Consultant represents tha~ It has all pereonnel required to perform the eervioea under ~his Agreement. All aerwioes required hereunder sh=11 b. performed by Con~u!tant, its employees or personnel %mder d~rec= contract with Consultant. Consultant shall not ~ss£gn to any subcontractor the performance of th£s Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of City. 7. DFSIGNATION OF PRINCIPA~. Consultant shall a~s!gn Randal Jackson, A1 Bell, and Susan DeSantis a~ the ;arsons who shall be primarily responsible for providing the ser~ices specified in the Agreement and directing Consultant ~hall provide City immediate notice of any disability of the above parsons materially ~ffeoting their ability to provid~ s~id. servi~ss, and fourteen (14) days' Consultant's or subcontractors' employ or change of assignment. consultant shall not permit the replacement of any of the above per.ohs with any other per~on~ without the express written consent of City. ~. ~C~RDS.. Consultant shall m~intain complete receipts and ~her ~uch information required ~ City that -5- 3099 Consultan~ ~h~11 maintain adequate re¢Or0~ of services provided in st~ficiemt d~ta~] to permit an evaluation 0~ sexyices. All ~uch records shall be maintained in accordance ~ith generally accepted accounting pr~.nciptes and shall De cl.~arly identified and readily accessible. Consu£tan[ shall vrc~vide ~rce access to the reDresentat~ve$ o~ City uc i~ designees a[ all proper times ~o such books and records, ~hail 9£ve CiCy the right to e~amine azd audit said books and records, shall permit to mak~ t~anscripts thersfrom as necessary, a~%d sha!]. allow inmpec~iua cf all work, data. documents, Droceedings activities related to thi~ Agrsement. ~uch reco~'ds, together with ~up~crting docuu~en~, ~hall ~e maintained for a period of three (3; years after receipt of final payment. 9. TIMB FOR PEBFORMANOE, Co~sultant shall co;~m~tce work und=r thi~ A~m~n~ u~o~] r~¢eipt of to Proceed ~uthorim~d by the City Council. Consultant agrees that [t shall diligently and re~pcnmibly pur~ue the performanc~ of t[~e service~ required of it b~ this Agreement, and that ~t snail follow the time scnedul~ forth in Exhibit "B", attached hereto arid [nco~Dora%ed reEerence as thou~ set forth ~n full herein. If a dela~ beyoho the control ~£ Co~l~u!tant rs encountered, a time -6- Jec/AG~ll~O~!~ ~8 ex~nsion may be mutually a~reed upon in writing b~ City an~ 'consultant. ¢onsal~ant shall pr~ssnt documentation satisfactory =o City to substantiate any request for a time extension. 10. T~RMINATION. This Agreement may be termtnate~ by either party upon the givin~ of a writtan "Notice of T~minaticn# to ~_he o~her party at least fifteen (1~} dams prior to ~he termination date specified in said notice. In Consultant shall immediately transmit City all do~u~%s and el=~er pa~y, consul=ant ~hall ~ p~ld in full ~or ~e value comply=ion of ccnsultan='~ wo~ on t~ da~e of te~i~tion. 11. COOPE~TION BY CITY. A~i p~lic da~a~ r~po~s, recorde~ and maps as are existing for Garryfag out the work a~ ~tlined in ~he ~oope Se~lces, slall ~e Eurni~h~d to Consultant withou~ charge by Ci~y. c~y s~all cooerate wi~ Consultant i~ every reasonable way ~o facilitate, wt~ou~ undue delay, =~e work to be perfo~ed under ~his Agreehr. 12. O~BRSHIP OF ~C~TS. Upon -7- ]e¢/AGRl13099 a~and0nme~n~ of, th3~ Ag~c~,,~nt, all original maps, models, demigns, drawings, pho~og[aphs, studies, surveys, reports, d&ca~ notes, compute~ ~u~tware/files and other documents prepared in the co~r~e of ~roviding the services to be pecformed pursuant c¢. thi~ Agreement shall, upon Daymeat for Consulcant'~ $~r¥3ues. become %he sole ~roperty of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disI)osed of by City without the permission of Consultant. 13. DEFAULT. In the e~ent that Co~%sultant is in default for cause under the termm of thi~ Agreel~ent, Cit~ ~nall h&v~ ~o obJigmtion or duty to ~ontinue oompen~atlng defau{t. Default ~ha/l include not p. rfcrmin~ the ta~km d~scribed herein t~ the reasonable matxmfactlon c~ City's P!unning Dir~uto~ 0~' t;~e Director's designee. Failure by C~r]sultant to mak~ ~rog~ss in the performance o~ work nereund~r, .if such failure arises ~ut Uf ~auses beyond its con[rol, and withuut £au]t or negligence of C~nsultant, shall not De considered a default. 14. AI~BITRATIO~.. Any disl;utes regarding perfo.-mance, default or other m~tters ]~] d~spute between City and Conmulta[~t arim]n9 out o~: tbi~ A~eemmnt or brSaeh ~hmreo[~ ~ha]] b'~ ~ol. ue~ by a~*bitratio~. 'l'he ar'bitrat~t'~ dasision ~hall be final. -8- ~ e c/&GR11 ~099 p,'~vided by ~ity og three retired judges ur the ~udtcl~l A~'Ditfation and ~ediatiQl~ Service o~ Omange County, The arbit. x'ati~n hearin9 ~ha!l be conducted according to California Cod~ of Civi~ ~rocedu~ S~tion i280, et m~g. Ci=y and Cu:]~ultant ~hall shar~ the cost of the arbitration 15. IND~NIPICAT!~N. Consultant skilled in the profess:onal oalling ne~e~azy to pe~'form the metvices and duti. e~ ,a~r~ed wi~h the ~tandards g~nerally recognized as being ~mpl~y~d by pro~ess/onais of c~nsultant's caliber ~ the State of California. N~ither pa~ty hereto shall be liable for, and eaoh party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the othe~ party and its respective directors, officur~, employees and agents, frDm and against any and all claims, losses, disputes and other liability or e~pense, including reasonable attorney's fee~, court costs and necessary disburse~ients, for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to, bodily ~njury, death or injury to ~roperty, proximately resulting from -9- the other party, ils o~flcer~, m,mployee~, a9en~s or w~th written notification O~ ~ny claim w~chin thirty ~ndemnif~In~ ~rty in ~I~ d~f~ns~ and/or settlement claim. 15. INSURANCe. Consultant shall provide and ~,a].ntain !n~uraDee ~cceptable to ~N~ City Attor~ey in force and ~ffect t~roughout t~e Ler~ of this agreement, agains~ claims for injuries to ~ersons or damages tO property which may ari~g from or }~ oG,l,~eo~ion with the performance of the work acreunder by Consultant, i~a agent~. representatives or ea,ploy~. I,~rance is to be with insurers with u Bests' rating of 1)o lees Lhan Co,~saltant shall provide th= following scope and limits Insurance Setvices Office ~crm number GL 0002 [~d. 1/73] cover]n~ Comprehensive General Liability and IDsurance Services office form nu~b~r Gi, 0484 coverin~ sroad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Dervice~ Office Co~ercial General Liabilit~ coverage ("ooourrence" form CG 0001), or -10- jec/AGRi 1-~ 09~ equivalent forms subject to the written approval of tl~e City. 2. In~urar~c~ Services O~ice ~orm number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/'/8) ¢overin~ AutomoOile LlaOility, code ! "any autO" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to t~e written approval o~ t~e City. 3. Workers' Compensation insura~¢e as reguired by the Labor Code of State of California and Employers' Liability insurance. Consultant shall uai~ta~n limits of insurance no le~ than: ~an,ra] Liahility~ $1,000,000 combined single 2. AuLomobile Liability: $1,000,000 ~ombined single limit pez acuidenb f~ bodily ~njur~ an~ property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employer's LJability: Workers' compensation as require~ b~ the Labor Cods of the S~ate o~ California and ~pio¥~rs Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. Insurance policies reguired b~ Lnis Agreement shall contain the following provisions: -11- ~ eC/AGR113 0 9 ~ 13 Each insurance policy shall state that coverage ~hal~ not be suspended, ¥o~ded, or canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in lim£ts except after thirty (30) day~' pr~or ~ritten not~ce by c~rtif~ed ~ail. Tamsouls, California . General ~l,hi]~ty ~nd A-tomobile Liability Coverage= Ci%y~ its officers, officials, and employees are ~o be covered ae addit~onal ~neureda as Consul~an~ performe~ products and oomple2~d operations of Consultant~ premises owned, occupied or u~e~ by Consultant, or automobiles owned~ l~a~ed, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage ~hal! con,sin no special limi=ationa on ~he eoopo o£ pro~ection a£forded to City, ~ts o~floor~, o£f~oi&le, empXoy~s. -12- je¢/AGR1 ] 3099 Co~mul:ant 'm i,l~urance coverage shal! be primacy ~nuuranoe a~ respect to City, its officer~, offi¢ialm, a~ employees. Any inourance maintained by City, its officers, of, and not co~t~bute with, Con~u].tant'm insurance. Any ~al]~re to ccmply with the reportin9 ~overage provided to City, its officers, o~[~c~als, or employees. Con~ultan~'~ insurance shall apply separately to each in~ure~ a~ainst whom claim is made or muir i~ brought, excep~ with ~espect to t~e limit~ of the Jnsucer's liability. Wor~ere' Cq~ensa~ion and SmDioyer~_Diabilit¥ Coverage jec/AGRI13~99 o~icers, officials, and employe~s for arisin~ from work pef~'o~med by ¢onsu~:a~t City. Co~sul!.ant agrges to deposit with City, at or before the effective date o~ this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City ~hat the ~nsurance provisio~s of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney ~lmy requize ~hat Consultant furnish C~ty with original endorseme~'~%s effecti~ ¢ovezage required by this Se~tiDn. The uertificates a~%d endorsements a~e to be migneo by a pe~'son authorized by that insu~er to bi~ couera~. ~n its behalf. City ~eserves the right to require complete, ~.rtified copies of all requirmd insurance poli¢~.~. at any tSme. Consultan~ shall furnish certificates and endo£s~m~n~s from each subcontractor identical to for subcolitractors shall b~ subject t~ all of the requirements stated her=in. -14- ~ ac/AGR1 13C)99 d®o£&z~d to and apprOVed by Ci~. ~equized [)~eby. I~, in the opinion of City, the in~u~anGe proviGionm i~ thiG col~tKa~t, form, and r~quir~d ~o provid~ adequate pro~octiQn. City'~ r=qui£ements shall be ~¢azonable but mhall be designated t~ m~sure protection fr~m and a9ainGt ~he kind and ~tent of the risks which eximt at the tlme a c!:an~e in insuranc~ is ~equir~. C~ty shall notify ConsulLant in w~]ting of ohanges in the jnSuranc~ requirements. ~f Consul~an~ ~oes not deposit copies of acceptable l~surance policies wi:h City l. ncorporati~;g such changes within sixty days of receipt of such notice, this Agreement shall be in de£~ult without further notice to Consultant arid City shall be entitled to all legal remedies. The p~ocurin9 of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not b~ construed to limit j ec/AGRi 1 Consultexan's liability hereunder not LO fulfill the Agreement. 17. AM~NDHENT~. This Agreement may be amended provided such amendment i~ in writing and agreed upon by both City and Consu~ta~t. ]$. ZNT!R~ AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and any herein, Integrates all term~ and cDrl~tJon~ mentioned herein prior written or oral understan~ing~ wi~h reap~ct ~o the subject matter hereof. 19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and ConSultant under~tand and agree that the law~ of thu State of California ~hall gGvern the ri~htm, o~ligatiOns, duties a~d the interpretation of this Agr,ement. 20. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. (a} Akl infocm~tion 9aaned by Consultant in performanoe of ~his A~reement ~h~11 be considered confidential and written aut~o£1za~ior~ ~x~e~ting that information which -16- Cite Public aeootds AeL, Govacnment Code Section 6250 et $e~. Consultant, its off!seca, employees° agents, or subcontractors, ~hali not voluntarily provide declarations, ietteza of ~up~o~t, testimony at depoeitiona~ :e~oneea ~ interrogatorice0 ot other info,marion concerninq the project o~ ~ocperat~ in any way with a party who m~y be adverse Lo City ot whom Consultant reasonably should ~now may be adverse in any m~aequenC litiga~ion. Consultant shall £nour no liability under tr:J~ Agreement f~: material~ ~ubmitted ~ it which are lathe[ re,eased by Cit~, its ~icers, employees, or agen:m. Consultant snail also incur no liability :or statements made by It at any Dubii~ meeting, ~ :oz any douume~lt released Oy Ic for which prior w~itten City au~hoci~&tlon was obtained. 2f Con&ultant o: any of Consultant's ~f~icers, negligently breach the p~oviaions ~f Section ~0. of this Agreemen% by provid~n9 information, documen%s, a~fi~avits, Sled/or decla=ations when not compelled by law and withou: the written G~n~¢nt of City, then City Consultacit fo~ any damages ~au~ed by Con~uitent'~ Dreach, ln¢ludillg atLorneys' fees. 06/27/9! 10a40 ~ 7147S5~648 8g$ 0¢ CunauiCanC shall promptly notify City a~ould Consultant, its of:leers, employees, agents, or subccnLra¢cora De served with any suzmno~%m, complaint, Subpoena. Notice Of De~o~itlOn, Request ~or Documents, InLerrogatories, Request ~or Admi~sionm, or other diseo~,e~y requeat~ from any pa~ty regarding thi~ agreement and the work per~o~ed thereunder. City re~ains the right, but not thm obligation, to represent CoBsu]tant and/or to be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar ~:Qceedin9. Consultant agree~ to Opportuni%y to r=view any response Lo discovery requests ptovid:~ by Consultant. However, ¢~Cy's right to review any much reaporate doem no£ imply or mean the right by City to ¢~ntrol, direct, oz' rewrite said response. C~ty warrants that Consultant s~all ~ave fully me[ the requirements o: th~s provision by dOtmining Clty's written approval prior to pzov~dlng documents, testimony, o~ Oeclarationa; consulting wit~ City before respol~ding :o a Subpoena or court e~der; in the case of depositions upo~ providing Notice to City of same; or p~oviding City opportunity to review discovery responses prior submission. Pot purposes of this section, a written authorization £rom City shall include a "fmxed" letter. Such approval in response Lo dep0a[tio~ls, -18- : ec/AGR113 0 9 9 £x~an=e~ Pa~e 1~,1 reque&~ to proouts. subpoena, or court order shall not b~ unreasonably withheld. (b) ConNultant covenants ~hat ri~itt)ez Consultant nor performance of s~rvi~es herein. Consul%an% Consultant as a~% officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor. Consulsant further covenants thac Consultant ham n~L cc~ltra~ted with nor i~ performi:t9 any mervice~ directly or indire~Ll~, with the developer(m) and/o~ p~operty owner(~) a.d/or firm(s) and/or partnereki~s owning property in the C~ty or the study area and furthwr uovenants and ap~e~ that Consultant and/or its ~ubc¢,)tracturs shall provide no service or ~nter i:~=o any contract whether written or oral wi=h developer(~) ~nd/ur property owner(s) and/o[ firm[s), and/or partncr~bip(~) ownin9 pzop~r~y in =he City and/or Consultant covenants and agrees that It I%as ~o conflict of i~terest either legal or professional, WhiOh -19- would impact in the conduct of this study. Xf it is provision~ of this paragraph, consultant shall ~avs materially breached =his Agreement, and forfeiteD all sums due for ~or~ in progra~s and ~hall pay City £or all addx=ional co~t~ in obtain£n~ a new consultant to complete the ~tudy. 21. ~OTXCES. Any and all no=ices, demands, invoices, and written ~ommuni=atiuns shall be conclusively a~er =~e deposit %hereof in ~he United S~a~es Mall, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows: Cl~y: gary_ Thornhill Plannin~ Departmen~ CITY OF TEMECULA ~]i72 Business ParM Or. Tamsouls, CA 92390 or David F. Dixon city Manager CITY OF TEMEC~LA 43172 Business Park Dr. Tamsouls, CA 92390 Congul~&ntt Randal Jackson, Principal The Planning Center 1300 Dove Street suite 100 Newport 5each, CA ~660 Susan A. DeSantis The Planning C~n~er 1300 Dove Street Suite 100 -20- 2e 22. SAVINGS CrAUSE. If any provision of Shim Agreemen~ is found to be invalid, void or unenforce~ls, the remaln£nq provisions shall nevertheless continue in full foroe and e~f~ot wigout bain9 impaired or invalidated in any way. IN WIT~;~ WHEREOF, ~he ~arties hereto have caused ~his Agreement ~o ~e exoouted ~he day and year first a~ove written, CITY OF TE~_ECULA TH~ P~w~NNING CENTER Ronald J, Parks Nayor ATTEST: Titles ~une s. GreeK, City Clark APPROVED AS TO ~ORN: Soot:t F. Field, City Attorney -21- THE PLANNING CENTER 1300 DOVE STREET SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 (7 ~ 4) 851-9444 · Planning & Research · Computer Services & GIS · Environmental Studies · Governmental Services & Policy Planning · Landscape Architecture · Resource Management · Urban Design Offices in: Newport Beach, CA Bakersfield, CA Hesperia, CA Sacramento, CA Phoenix, AZ Tucson, AZ April 23, 1991 Mr. Gary Thornhill, Planning Director City of Temecula P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, California 92390 Dear Mr. Thornhill: The Planning Center is pleased to submit this revised budget and project cash flow projections for the preparation of a General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and EIR for the City of Temecula. The budget revisions reflect the direction we received from the City at our meeting last Thursday in terms of reduced level of effort in chosen tasks, and the elimination of particular tasks from the scope of work. Proposed budget reductions total $76,270 for a new budget projection of $485,800. The attached revised budget and cash flow projections reflect the modifications to the budget and scope. The revised budget incorporates the following modifications: Reduced level of involvement at monthly project team meetings from two participants to one, for a cost savings of $11,000 in Task 1.4. Limit analysis of regional trends in the preparation of the Economic and Fiscal Analysis reports by Stanley Hoffman Associates, for a cost savings of $1,800 in Task 2.5.1. Reduced involvement and attendance at in-house meetings related to baseline traffic data analysis by Wilbur Smith Associates for a cost savings of $1,000 in Task 2.5.2. Delete the hazardous waste analysis portion from the NBS Lawry scope of work for Task 2.5.3, resulting in a cost savings of $8,000. Delete the Community Telephone Survey in Task 3.1, for a reduction of $20,000. (Survey questions will be addressed in conjunction with the Parks Survey). 6 Limit the depth of alternative analysis in Task 4.3.3 by Wilbur Smith Associates, as well as in-house meetings, for a total cost savings of $3,000. Reduce the level of depth of contingency analysis in the preparation of the Circulation Element report by Wilbur Smith Associates for a cost savings of $2,000. Delete Task 5.13, the General Plan Consistency Program from the scope of work for a cost savings of $3,960. Substitute a joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop for two individual public hearings in Task 7.1, for a reduction of $1,410. Stanley Hoffman Associates cuts attendance at one public hearing for a cost savings of $960 in this task. Total cost savings in the public hearing phase is $2,370. 10. In Task 7.3, the Planning Commission and City Council review of the Zoning Ordinance is deleted for a cost savings of $2,640. 11. The six(6) meetings specified as Key City Staff meetings shall be consolidated with monthly team staff meetings, scheduled at appropriate milestones, for a cost savings of $9,540. Attendance by Stan Hoffman Associates at one public Town Hall meeting is deleted for a cost savings of $960. Total cost savings in the meeting phase is $10,500. 12. One camera ready original will be provided to the City for all document transmittals as a substitute for the copying of the required number of copies by the project team. This results in a cost savings of $10,000 in the reimbursable budget.' Also included in the cost savings is the provision of an aerial photograph by the City to the project team. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself or Deborah Rogoff at (714)851-9444. Sincerely yours, THE PLANNING CENTER , 0 Lt') 0 t13 0 I/3 0 ~ 0 LO 0 (spuesno4.L) ,IJ~llJlPllg lI, J BTN Pro ram Approach Program Approach As the recently incorporated City of Temecula moves into the 1990's, it is faced with many issues. Through the process of generating a simplified General Plan and Zoning Ordinance than the regulatory mechanisms currently in place, the City will have the opportunity to address these issues in a comprehensive document that wil} successfully guide Temecula into the future. The City is to be commended for its commitment to establish a complete policy/regulatory system at this stage in its operation as a newly incorporated municipality. Problems attributed to deficiencies in general plans often turn out to be cases of inadequate or incomplete administration and implementation. The process of thinking out the policy and regulatory tools the City will use to shape its future in a comprehensive and integrated fashion will reap an outstanding value for the investment made in time and money. The Planning Center's extensive work with specific plans (containing both policy and regulation) as well as general plans has given us an appreciation for the linkages required to make policies work. Much of our approach to this plan will be shaped by a continuing consciousness of what will need to be done to carry it out. 1 Program Approach APPENDIX A We Provide Creative and Workable Solutions Transition From County to City Policy/Regulatory System Project Considerations The Planning Center examines each project on its own merits. While drawing on a reservoir of previous successes, we are willing to apply nonconventional solutions. Our internal staff strategy meetings allow the project team to pool experience and 'brainstorm' difficult problems. Many past projects are unique and required application of sound techni- cal tools in a creative method. This is perhaps best reflected in The Planning Center's expertise in Specific Plans, which by their very nature require sensitive and innovative problem solving. This same philosophy applies at the General Plan scale, and is of utmost importance to the City of Temecula. An important issue in the discussion of the General Plan scope of work is the establishment of a simplified policy/regulatory system to replace the more complex County system currently accepted but not adopted, by the City. A quotation from the City's RFP and our related observations illustrate this need: 'Currently, the City is operating without a General Plan having decided that the previously approved County General Plan for this area does not adequately address the City's concerns. The City Council has decreed that the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) and other County general plan provisions be used only as a 'guideline and not as an adopted standard.' The government code does provide for the use of such guidelines in deciding on development projects during the general plan formulation. This will become particularly critical when the alternatives have been identified, the preferred alternative has been defined, and the likely direction of the general plan becomes clearer. We propose to provide the City with interim policy review guidelines, updated at least once during the planning process so that important potentials and opportunities for significant improvement are not lost during this critical period. The Planning Center will work with the City and County staff to determine that the most recent text (SWAP) is being utilized and if there exists any conflict with other zoning documents or Development AgreemenL It is essential to document actual entitlements in order to know how the system can be simplified and if there are policy changes which require serious consideration. Program Approach APPENDIX A The Plan will need to be understandable, implementable and manageable. This requires a regulatory system with a sound basis in the General Plan; one that i$ simple enough to be administered by a sinaft staff, yet powerful enough to insure implementation of Oily policy. It will be critical to obtain from the Oily and other agencies: plans, entitlement, agreements, conditions, etc. This information will be critical to establish of a strategy for reconciling and setting policy for the City's own entitlement system. We have focused attention on this issue because it impacts so much of the General Plan and will be critical to Plan implementation. Our approach to positioning the City to launch its own regulatory system which reflects the necessary consistency with the new General Plan includes the following steps: Work with City and County staff to verify which regulations apply to various land areas. Search out stated or implied intent applicable to the latest and the most detailed specification in the transferred County records. Exclude regulations which apply outside of the current City Boundary, but isolate what is within the City's Sphere of Influence for potential use later. Identify standard ingredients and provisions which are unique to a particular area. Separate policias/guidelines/regulations/conditions and organize by "key word' categories to be addressed in the General Plan. Identify "common denominator' land use classifications and potential zoning designations to reconcile a system of General Plan land uses and consistent zoning districts. Verify conclusions with key County staff to achieve as much accuracy of interpretation as the system will allow. Survey land use administration preferences of the City staff. Devise ingredients in the Land Use Element and implementation programs which will bring about a workable transition from the County to the City system. 3 Program Approach APPENDIX A Growth Management/Air euality Growth Management Element Reconcile and provide guidance on consistent gross and net density calculation methodologies to insure accurate translation of density and intensity yields. Codify the land use/guideline/regulatory system. Describe a process for transitioning to the new system. Develop and describe a general plan consistency program which will enable the City to comply with State consistency requirements. The Planning Center's extensive general plan and specific plan experience, combined with an approach in which all involved parties play an active role in shaping the plan, gives us confidence that we can craft a land use system that will meet the City's needs. Air quality, congestion management, land use and circulation are intrinsically interrelated, These relationships will be charted and their impacts on the City made known as part of the issue paper approach and optional elements, They will also provide the source for the eventual air quality and growth management elements. Growth Management is a topic of special significance to a new City located along a major transportation route (but without rail service) in a rapidly growing County and with substantial growth potential within its existing boundaries as well as within its sphere of influence. Because Temecula will be impacted so significantly by what goes on around it, we will examine carefully the County Growth Management Element and evaluate how best to relate Temecula's growth policies and programs to the countywide program. Each of the 19 policy areas will be reviewed. It will also be important to establish close working relationships with nearby cities, in particular, Murietta. Careful analysis will be conducted regarding mechanisms and options available to the City (and the degree to which their use would be productive) for the establishment of: special requirements for the phasing of development and public improvements; limits within which growth can occur for a prescribed pedod of time; special standards for development within certain areas; incentives for selected types of development and restrictions on others; programs to stimulate growth at certain times and retard it at others; and systems and procedures for accomplishing the growth management techniques the City elects to use. Special focus will be provided on the implications of the City's Growth Management Element and its ability to benefit from (or avoid negative consequences or) such considerations as the Riverside County 4 Program Approach APPENDIX A Consider 2010 Horizon Year Economic Analysis Objectives Proposition A funding; the State Congestion Management Program and the Air Quality Management Plan. Qualification for available funding will be a major consideration in this analysis. Many public agencies and jurisdictions are taking their planning forecasts to a Hodzon Year of 2010 as a tool in achieving present and future aspirations over a 20-year period and beyond. The 20-year time hodzon in the plan would allow us to structure the implementation program to achieve short-term, mid-range and long-term goals, which we believe is beneficial to the City. As part of the General Plan Program, it is recommended that a reliable projection of the City's market demand and development trends be prepared, There are several objectives of such an analysis: To provide a current economic profile for Temecula; To evaluate the economic potential of Temecula in a regional context; To establish a reliable projection of future market demand and development as a basis for General Plan preparation; To focus on the key growth sectors of the local economy; To formulate an Economic Development Element which will assist the City in determination of land use, development policy, and economic program components to lead to balanced growth and development for Temecula. As part of the General Plan program it is necessary to identify the impacts of alternative land use patterns on the fiscal resources of Temecula. The City should identify means to capture a reasonable share of the beneficial growth which will occur in the surrounding region over the next 20 years. In this sense, the fiscal analysis will be closely linked with the analysis of economic growth and development also proposed as part of the General Plan program. 5 Program Approach APPENDIX A A unified vision will clarify direction Vision provides the nucleus that ties the program and plans together Direction and Vision Before the initial analysis can begin, the direction and overall goals of the plan must be developed. The development of goals for the General Plan could become complicated given the current division of the City Council. One unified goal or vision is necessary to clarify the City's future and unify the Council's direction. Vision for a community is a mental picture of the future created by anticipating or conceiving important, desired community characteristics. This mental picture is imaginative in that it envisions conditions that do not now exist. But it is eminently practical in that it motivates action and sustains commitment to a common direction. Such continuity and persistence is essential in the competitive environment in which cities now find themselves. A vialon Statement can provide guidance on the thrust and scope of the General Plan. This is essential because the common focus on State mandated elements o~ten obscures the need for some central direction or rationale for a community plan. To establish a vision, several dimensions must be considered. Each dimension or perspective of a community's future is a critical ingredient in shaping the plans for realizing the vision. The vision statement performs three vital functions in the planning program: 1) establishing a consensus on overall community growth and change; 2) shaping the content and thrust of mandated and optional general plan elements; and 3) identifying criteria for action priorities. In effect, the vision statement becomes the central integrating tool in the process. By developing goals for each of the following six ways to visualize a community, a clear direction can be established. By further defining intent statements for each of the goals, elements of the plans can be tested rapidly by referring back to the vision of Temecula as: A physical place; An economic system; An environmental system; A society; A governmental jurisdiction; and A symbol. 6 Program Approach APPENDIX A Together, these elements form the basis for a sustainable community. Every participant in the program---council member, planning commissioner, GPCC member, or community member--has personal interests which generally are tied to specific issues. The Planning Center proposes to use these six dimensions as the nucleus for issue analysis, element development, strategy identification and the final action plan. They will tie all aspects of the program and plans together. The following diagrams illustrate these relationships. VI810N GENERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN ELEMENTS SYMBOL STRATEGY ACTION PLAN PHYSICAL ECONOMIC PLACE /THE CIW'~ SYSTEM OF ~ TEMECU GOVERNMENTAl ' JURISDICTION ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM SOCIETY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Issue Papers facilitate understanding and direction Issue Driven Process A key aspect of our approach are "Issue Papers." This innovative approach used for the Southeast Quadrant General Plan Program in the City of Upland and the Stanton General Plan Update, proved a valuable tool for both Cities. We are currently utilizing the issue paper approach for the Yorba Linda General Plan Update Program, and the Laguna Niguel General Plan, also a newly incorporated City. We have developed a format for the Issue Papers that facilitates understanding, analysis and decision-making by providing clear issue statements, background, options, and implications. In addition, to better understand the issue topics and their relationship to the General Plan, they will be categorized by the six dimensions outlined earlier. The issue papers will offer citizens, City staff and decision makers a "working document" with which to state policy preferences as the basis 7 Program Approach APPENDIX A for plan alternatives. The revised papers are specifically designed to then be folded directly into the General Plan. The following diagram depicts conceptually how vision and issues analysis support the General Planning Process. Vision provides continuity throughout the planning process. Along with the vision, issue topics and issue papers drive the shaping of alternatives and the preferred plan. The issue papers serve es working tools during this process for both the technical analysis and community input. They also generate goals as part of the final vision statement which are translated into the General Plan Elements. Additional factors which are brought to bear in formulating the elements are the intemal (the City as an organization) and external (the City in the region) strategic considerations. Mainly, these considerations influence the policies and programs, as well as providing ingredients for the Implementation and Monitoring Program. At the completion of the General Planning Program, the Community Vision serves as a useful summary of the General Plan for ready reference by a broad array of interested parties. 8 Program Approach APPENDIX A GENERAL PLANNING PROCESS VISION/ISSUES FLOW CHART ISSUE TOPICS ISSUE PAPERS ALTERNATIVE PLANS COMMUNIl~( ~ I i~ TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OUTREACH (STAFWCONSULTANT) PREFERRED PlAN FINAL ISSUE PAPERS FINAL VISION STATEMENT C St~tegiF onlioerl.ons AND GOALS GENERAL PLAN/EIR Strategic Consicler~tlon~ Citizen Participation Strategy Citizen Participation The basic strategy of the proposed citizen participation program is to go to the citizenry often and make each visit meaningful. This means that public meetings must focus on subjects which are timely and useful to completion of the General Plan, as opposed to having meetings on a fixed schedule and not having the right products for effective use of the time. This is less critical at the beginning of the planning program because the main thrust is to get input and identify issues, It becomes much more important as the Plan takes shape. 9 Program Approach APPENDIX A Program Principles Task and product milestones are identified on the master schedule, indicating the points at which key meetings occur and specifying the topics for presentation and discussion. Several principles are proposed to drive this part of the planning program: A Citizen Participation Roles and Relationships description will be drafted for staff, Planning Commission and City Council review and approval so that all parties understand what the Citizen Participation Program is and is noL Public meetings will be used mainly for three purposes: to inform the public about the general planning effort; to stimulate their interest in and enthusiasm for the City's potential; and to get feedback from interested citizens. Meetings will be conducted in the most informal and comfortable environment available, with much attention to an *inviting' attitude rather than a formal 'lecture'. Where appropriate, small group discussions may occupy part of the agenda in larger meetings. Every effort will be made to engage the citizens actively in the process, by such means as community graphics, focused response sheets and leveraged participation. A program of leveraged participation will be implemented in which a combination of community leaders, city staff and consultant representatives will meet with discussion groups at neighborhood and local organization levels ( e.g., homeowners' organizations, church groups, Chamber of Commerce, etc.). This will entail a method of summarizing feedback and enCouraging those who participate to get involved in other scheduled citizen participation meetings. Mailing lists will be prepared and maintained for distribution of subsequent materials. Energy will be focused on the General Plan tasks and products at hand, capturing input in written form and seeking out points of consensus. Meetings will be advertised well in advance to make it feasible for people to schedule their participation. 10 Program Approach APPENDIX A The General Plan Coordinating Committee and assigned senior staff member will be the primary source of policy direction for the planning process, leaving to the full Planning Commission and the City Council their responsibilities for, respectively, recommending and adopting the Plan. Each vehicle for informing the citizenry and getting their input to the Plan will. be used individually or in combination to achieve ' the most cost effective response. A constant orientation toward inviting public commentary will be maintained. To save time and money, and to achieve optimum effective- ness, joint worl(shops of the City Council and Planning Commission will be encouraged, with members of other advisory boards invited as well. This will enable the schedule to be accomplished with much greater awareness of Plan provisions than if the only exposure were through formal public hearings. Special participation events will be handled by appropriate members of the consultant team. Random input will be handled locally on a continuing basis by Deborah Page in addition to her other specific assignments. Meeting Descriptions COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETINGS It is recommended that open houses be held to sustain the public's interest throughout the course of the project. The open houses would be conducted in an informal manner at a public building in Temecula. The meeting room would be set-up with displays and staffed with technicians involved in the planning process. This type of informal format allows for individual citizens to browse the available information and find the staff person/display that is most pertinent to his/her concern. Questions can then be quickly answered allowing the citizen to return to his/her busy schedule. The citizens would be greeted at the door by a representative and informed of the information and staff available to him/her for one-on-one questions and answers. Before leaving, the citizen would also be invited to leave written comments/concerns on an available form. These comments would then be summarized in the project newsletter. The purpose of an open house is to keep the concerns on an individual basis rather than creating the illusion of "us against them" which sometimes occurs when a speaker is at a podium orating at the crowd. The focus is on the individual rather than the organized groups. It is recommended that open houses be held three times throughout the planning process: as soon as technical studies for the EIR have been completed, when alternative growth scenarios are available, and when the draft document is completed. Program Approach APPENDIX A If the City remains committed to public workshops, three are recommended at the same points as the open houses, The difference would be in the manner of organization, presentation and input, Small group discussion would be included in the agenda to make it possible for individuals to have speaking opportunities - something difficult to achieve with a large group. Input guidance would be provided to make it possible to develop and assimilate ideas from a large number of participants, TOWN HALL MEETINGS Two such meetings will be held as an aid in preparing the preliminary and preferred alternatives. A "speaker's list' format will be used after a break separating the presentation portion of the Town Hall to insure that maximum input is received. Written comments using a prescribed format will also be invited, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS Four such meetings will be held in locations selected by the City. It is recommended that this selection not be made until analysis of the attitude and opinion research is completed. That analysis should be used to influence the location, timing and subject focus of the neighborhood meetings. SCOPING MEETING FOR EIR The "scoping" process is also proposed to be utilized to gain understanding of local community issues and concerns, as well as to identify concerns. To accomplish this we propose to schedule a public scoping meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to gather data from the public and agencies which will be used in the preparation of the EIR and related planning documents. The scoping meeting should be held early in the planning process, prior to the selection of a preferred alternative. Citizens would be notified of the meeting through a large public notice in the local newspapers and local radio stations. Agencies and local organizations will be notified through a direct mailing. A summary of written comments and letters received will be prepared in report form and submitted to the project manager. This strategy could produce significant public exposure and involvement at relatively little cost and consumption of elapsed time. GENERAL PLAN COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETINGS Five such meetings will be held as described in the RFP. 12 Program Approach APPENDIX A JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Two such workshops are proposed: one at the point of selecting a preferred alternative and one at the point of distributing the draft Plan. The purpose of these workshops is to provide critical insight for these important decision makers and give them an opportunity to make observations without being compelled to take an 'approval" stance at that poinL Depending on the course of the project, it may be possible to offset one set of hearings by the Commission and Council using this device. PROJECT COORDINATION MEETINGS Coordination meetings will be scheduled as prescribed in the RFP. An agreed upon progress report and agenda format will be developed to insure thoroughness and continuity. Besides the 18 meetings with the Planning Staff, 6 meetings will be held with key City Staff at critical points. See Technical Advisory Committee below for an alternative approach. TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEES A total of 10 meetings throughout the process and joint kick-off meeting will be held, The focus of these meetings will be upon implementation feasibility and mechanisms. See Technical Advisory Committee below for an alternative approach. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE This is a combination of the Key Staff meetings and Technical Subcommittee Meetings in the form of a consolidated Technical Advisory Committee. It would be more difficult to coordinate, but could achieve some additional 'integration' value and be done at somewhat lower cost. The City's Department Heads are important potential clients and users of the General Plan and would benefit from working together in its formation, particularly with respect to implementation actions. PUBLIC HEARINGS Four hearings each are proposed before the Planning Commission and City Council. (One set of joint workshops could possibly substitute for one or even two hearings.) COUNCIL/OPINION LEADER INTERVIEWS 10 brief interviews will be conducted with Council members and others identified by the City to seek initial insight into important issues which must get attention in the General Plan, This is a step designed to 13 Program Approach APPENDIX A capture the benefit of long term involvement by selected community leaders. It has proven in other communities to be a very productive step. GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION CENTER It is recommended that a General Plan Information Center be established at the public library where interested persons could review project information throughout the course of the project. The public library is an ideal location for a project information center since it is open on weekends and evenings which would allow for a greater availability of information. The project information center would answer the who, what, when, where, and why's of the project and list upcoming meetings. A phone number for additional information would be available for the public to call. It is recommended that the General Plan Information be updated throughout the course of the planning process. MEDIA RELATIONS AND CLIPPING SERVICE Media contacts will be established to aid in dissemination of information about the planning process as well as the nature and content of upcoming meetings. Contacts will be initiated with the local media including cable television stations, radio stations and newspapers. A newspaper clipping service is advisable to monitor publications. All clips should be reviewed and copied. Articles of key interest may be included in monthly summary reports and circulated to all appropriate team members on a timely basis. DIRECT PUBLIC INQUIRIES 'rimely response to letters and phone calls from the public will be essential in obtaining consensus. It will be necessary to coordinate and respond to all public inquiries. The inquiry calls or mail which are received from the public should be recorded on a computerized master interest list with the name, address, phone number and particular interest referenced and any follow-up, if necessary, should be documented. NEWSLETTERS Regardless of the method selected for community outreach meetings, we propose to distribute brief newsletters at several key points throughout. the process to all known organizations in the City - homeowners' associations, Chamber of Commerce, community groups, churches, etc. as well as to individuals who have indicated an interest in being kept informed, We envision distribution on the average of once every tl~ree months, according to product milestones. 14 Program Approach APPENDIX A Consistency Bstwsen the General Plan and Physical Dsvelopmsnt Which It Guides Is A Bust Focus on Proactivs Implementation Program Intergovernmental Coordination Issues extend beyond jurisdictional boundaries... so too must our planning process. Cooperation, not conflict. The General Plan As A Management Tool The City's General Plan must be, first and foremost, a management plan that puts the City in charge of its own destiny. The State Law is very specific about the requirement for the General Plan's development policies, including goals, objectives, principles, policies, plan proposals and standards, to provide a guide for action and implementation. This. consistency is one ef the primary attributes of a defensible General Plan. We propose developing a General Plan Implementation and Monitoring Program which clearly establishes the mechanisms in which physical development related decisions and the mitigation measures of the EIR will comply with provisions of the General Plan. Our vision of the General Plan is that it is a critical part of the City's entire policy/regulatory structure and must link directly to all regulatory mechanisms used by the City. A successful General Plan is one that is actually used to further community aspirations. That is why implementation of the General Plan will be an important aspect of our effort for Temecula. A proactive implementation plan and zoning ordinance will be integrated into the City's inherent organization and operation. Land use and development decisions are affected by many Federal, State, regional and local agencies and other units of government. Where local or regional input is not well-coordinated, or is absent from the decision-making process, local options may be unnecessarily constrained. Efforts to coordinate planning with other jurisdictions and institutions at all levels of govemment have become increasingly important because of the dramatic restructuring of American cities and suburbs that has occurred With the emergence of new multi-centered metropolitan regions. Rarely does one community have jurisdiction over enough land, financing, or infrastructure to shape its own destiny. Today, communities are learning that if they want to be able to deal with growth, they can't do it alone. Only through strong intergovernmental coordination can problems which reach beyond jurisdictional boundaries be properly addressed, managed and resolved. The Planning Center will help Temecula respond to the multiplicity of diverse and often conflicting demands. Intergovernmental coordination throughout the planning process will occur with special frequency on the issues of land use compatibility, air quality, public services and facilities, and transportation including issues associated with the Congestion Management Program implementation. 15 Program Approach APPENDIX A Familiarity with Regional Programs The Plan Must Enable the City to Manage its Destiny The Tasks are Both Basic and Creative The Program EIR as an Effective Management Tool The Planning Center makes it our business to be aware of and track regional policies and programs, particularly those which may have a profound impact on our public and private sector clients, How these programs interrelate is a fundamental consideration in our planning efforts. As a part of Task One, Scoping Meeting, we will determine the scope of the intergovernmental coordination program. In most cases, our current assignments will minimize the Clty's cost of keeping abreast, and influencing, the ever-changing regulatory\political milieu. Conceptual Format The City's General Plan is fundamentally a management plan. There are many ways to organize the general plan content to facilitate this management role. For example, it may be desirable to consolidate certain elements such as consen/ation and open space. The key is to structure the Plan so that it is "user friendly" for the decision makers who must work with iL That is an issue we propose to address early in the process, reviewing with City officials some examples and the advantages and disadvantages of each. The consultants' basic tasks include: reviewing all existing documentation, describing and documenting current conditions; determining consistency of data; identifying issues, opportunities and constraints; analyzing them to focus on priorities; formulating' appropriate goals and objectives; drafting plans (elements) to achieve those goals and objectives; communicating this material to citizens and City officials; incorporating reactions from these sources into refined and improved drafts; developing a proactive implementation program; and preparing the necessary documents and supporting materials to facilitate adoption. These are the 'bread and butter" tasks required by commonly accepted planning practice. What makes the difference, however, is the insight to problem solving and the capture of opportunities brought to the preparation of these materials. That is the ingredient we have sought in forging the consultant team. For environmental analysis, a Program EIR as requested in the RFP, has been chosen due to the following advantages: it provides an occasion for a more exhaustive consideration of effects and alternatives than would be practical in an EIR on individual actions; it ensures consideration of cumulative impacts that might be slighted in a case-by- case analysis; it avoids duplicative consideration of basic policy considerations; it allows the Lead Agency to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures at an early time when the agency has greater flexibility to deal with cumulative impacts; 16 Program Approach APPENDIX A Document Format Alternatives Desktop Published Quality Documents and it allows for a reduction in paper work. The foundation for the background information included in the EIR will be derived from the Master Environment Assessment which will be completed at an earlier time in the General Plan process. The MEA, will contain exhaustive environmental data for the City and will serve as the City's environmental base. We propose a "turn-key" EIR, in which The Planning Center: prepares the Notice of Preparation; conducts the mailings of all notices; prepares the Notice of Completion and Notice of Determination; and coordinates with the State Clearinghouse of the Office of Planning and Research. Use of the Program EIR will also enable the City of Temecula to characterize the overall General Plan program as each future development project is proposed. Using both the MEA and Program EIR subsequent development projects proposed within the City must then be reviewed in the context of these two documents to determine if additional environmental documentation is required. We believe that it is in the City's best interests to streamline the document format through an integrated General Plan/EIR approach. We propose a double volume report format, either under a single 3-ring notebook cover, or as two separate but related documents. Volume I is envisioned as the General Plan Policy portions, containing: A General Plan Overview; a Summary by Element of issue related background information; the Goals, Policies and Strategies; and the Implementation Program. Volume II, the Technical Report, contains: the mandated CEQA sections; existing conditions and background summary to meet CEQA and State General Plan requirements (the existing conditions/background analysis presentation in the Technical Report Volume II is intended to minimize duplication of material); issue analysis; and support data for both volumes, A separate MEA will be developed to guide the preparation of the EIR sections and analysis, and will serve as a database for the City of Temecula. Technical reports will be included in the MEA document. All CEQA sections would be identified by a different typeset to establish a clear identification system for environmental related issues. This format supports the premise that General Plans should be self- mitigating, meaning that once policies and implementation programs are established in the Plan, the need for external mitigation measures is eliminated. All General Plan and EIR documentation will be desktop published with ease of access, excellent readability, and ease of reproduction as our aim. The Planning Center will review with the City staff the appropriate format for all tables, reports and documents. All computer-based data will be turned over to the City in IBM micro-computer formats. 17 Program Approach APPENDIX A We Start with Clear Direction An invaluable tool to establish expectations and clarify responsi. billties of all project participent~ Staff and Consultants Make a Strong Team Our Work is Compre. hensive and Defensible Our Technical and Design Skills are Extensive Team Coordination and Management In order to assure clarity in project direction, The Planning Center Team will meet with City staff to agree on a scope of services, the work program and project schedule. As part of this meeting, the consultant team will prepare a list of data base needs and expectations about roles and responsibilities with respect to the City Council, Planning Commission, Citizen Participation and Community Outreach Program, intergovernmental coordination, the Technical Advisory Committee, and key City staff. Based on the scoping meeting, establishment of data base needs and preliminary client-consultant roles, The Planning Center will prepare a Project Guidance Package which outlines roles, relationships and operating principles for the project. We have found this to be an invaluable tool to establish expectations and clarify responsibilities of all project participants. For example, the Citizen Participation and Community Outreach Program activity and composition will need confirmation. This program will be important to the process, because it will provide input on community attitudes and will result in far-reaching decisions. Open and direct communication between City staff and the consultant team creates a prosperous and efficient working relationship. We maintain a close working relationship with our clients by keeping them informed of, and involved in the project as progress and alerting them to potential problems. Team communication will be maintained through various means including shared computer files, team meetings, periodic status reports, and day-to-day telephone and mall contacts. Increasing potential for legal action challenging City development decisions on the basis of an inadequate general plan renders it important to have both a defensible document and process for arriving Our experience and knowledge of State planning and zoning laws, General Plan Guidelines and CEQA ensures that final products are defensible and meet all appropriate requirements. Through research and discussions with City staff, we can gain a thorough understanding of local requirements and the approval processes. Such knowledge is imperative to maximize usefulness of the General Plan and Environ- mental Impact Report. The team's public planning experience is extensive and provides its members with an understanding that planning tools must be both comprehensive and implementable, The Planning Center is currently responsible for the preparation of seven General Plan Programs throughout the State of California, from four "New Towns" in Sutter 18 Program Approach APPENDIX A Computers are Part of the Team Capabilities Consistency is Key County, to the built community of Yorba Linda. The Planning Center is well recognized for its design skills, as exhibited in the many Pacific Coast Builders Conference Gold Nugget Awards for site planning, and wide spread recognition of the 'Practical Guide Series' of education booklets including: The Selection, Care and Feeding of the Consultant; Specific Plans; the Environmental Planning Process in California; and Mitigation Monitoring. Our computer system includes an in-house Computer Manager and state-of-the art hardware and software. Staff is trained in desktop publishing (Ventura Publisher), computer graphics (GEM Presentation Team, Corel Draw, and Pixie), computer-aided design (AutoCAD and LandCAD), and geographic information systems (GI$ ARCinfo) which maximizes quality and efficiency in preparation of our products. The Planning Center offers computer-aided analysis capabilities using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools which is applicable to data base development as indicated in the City's RFP. We have broad experience in developing and enhancing digital databases. The Planning Center has an in-house team committed to applying this advanced technology to a multitude of planning applications. Our GIS staff is fluent in the use of leading GIS packages including ARC/INFO, MAP and IDRISI. The Planning Center is committed to maintaining our presence as leaders in this emerging field as we continue to offer our clients all the benefits of this technology. Our management and products are consistent and at a level of quality of which we can be proud. Our in-house quality control is thorough and we often use a shared firm/client quality control checklist to assure that products are consistent with client expectations and that they are accu- rate, technically sound and presentable. 19 APPROVAL RO CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department July 2, 1991 Parcel Map No. 21769, Amended No. 3, Second Extension of Time PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: Scott Wright Staff recommends that the City Council: Adopt Resolution 91- approving a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map No. 21769, Amended No. 3 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Industrial Commercial Properties Industrial Commercial Properties To create 4 parcels 19.3 acres, 14.3 acres, 19.2 acres, and q2.1 acres in size on a 9~.9 acre site. Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of the Temecula Inn Golf Course. At the Planning commission hearing of May 20, 1991 Revised Parcel Map 21769 was approved by a vote of 5-0 subject to the Conditions of approval which the Commission revised as follows: Condition No. 5, regarding subdivision phasing, Condition No. 6, regarding installation of landscaping, Condition No. 7, regarding payment of fees prior to grading, Conditions 9 and 10, regarding utilities, and Conditions No. 12, A: PM21769-A1 1 regarding replacement of trees removed, were deleted. These conditions were intended to apply to subsequent development of the site but were eliminated because Condition No. lq prohibits grading, construction or site improvements prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. Condition No. 11 regarding preservation of trees was amended by deleting the words "wherever feasible." Condition No. 20, now Condition No. 1~ was amended to read as follows: An agreement for the development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map No. 21769 Amended No. 3 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SW: ks Attachments: Resolution 91- Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report Exhibits A. Vicinity Map B. Parcel Map No. 21769, Amended No. 3 A:PM21769-A1 2 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 21769 AMENDED NO. 3 TO SUBDIVIDE A 94.9 ACRE PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON RAINBOW CANYON ROAD IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF TEMECULA CREEK INN GOLF COURSE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-230-005, 006. WHEREAS, Industrial Commercial Properties filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769 Amended. No. 3, Extension of Time in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map Extension application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Parcel Map Extension on May 20, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Tentative Parcel Map Extension; WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Tentative Parcel Map Extension on July 2, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said Tentative Parcel Map Extension; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. the following findings: Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty {30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. A:PM21769-A1 1 (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, I hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map Extension is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. {2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (a) There is reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, Extension of Time proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. A:PM21769-A1 2 The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. q60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development, e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. (2) The Council in approving of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map Extension, makes the following findings, to wit: A:PM21769-A1 3 a) b) c) d) e! f) h) The County adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the original approval of Parcel Map No. 21769. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time in that the lots are of sufficient size to conform to the standards of any zone. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed Parcel Map is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. q60, Schedule H. The proposed Parcel Map will be superseded by Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 which will not have a significant detrimental impact on the environment in that the Revised Parcel Map is a land division for conveyance purposes only and no permits for grading, improvements, or any development related disturbance to the site will be issued prior to the completion of landfill closure requirements and approval of site development plans. The design of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 which will supersede Parcel Map No. 21769 Amended No. 3 is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic. The design of the subdivision is such that it is not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. A:PM21769-A1 ~ Prior to issuance of permits for grading, construction, or improvements on the site, a work plan for the disposal of contaminated soils resulting from previous waste disposal operations conducted on the site shall be approved by the County solid Waste Management Local Enforcement Agency { LEA) and shall be implemented to completion and all required post-excavation clearance shall be obtained from LEA and the regional air and water quality agencies. No grading, construction or site improvements shall occur prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. These conditions shall either supplement or replace as noted all conditions of the original Tentative Map approval and subsequent amendments. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 10. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer. subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No, PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 11. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and Parks and Recreation Department. 12. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. A :PM21769 13 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. An agreement for the development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. 15. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on any parcel, a formal development plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for formal development review processing. 17. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 18. Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for any parcel, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the El R/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated lassuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. A: PM21769 1 ~ j) The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health. safety and general welfare. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps. exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference, E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 2, the Tentative Parcel Map Extension is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves a Second Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No, 21769 for the subdivision of a 94,9 acre parcel into ~ parcels located on Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of Temecula Creek Inn Coif Course and known as Assessor's Parcel No, 922-230-005. 006 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION t[. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1991. RONALD J PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCI LMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK A:PM21769-A1 5 CiTY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No: 21769 Amended No. 3 Project Description: To create 4 parcels on a 94.9 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-230-005, 006 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule _H, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. e The Second Extension of Time will expire four years after the original approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is August 21, 1991. e Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. e The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the' City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66tt99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. e All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. A: PM21769 12 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL DATE: 3-12-90 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO 21769, Rev. ~1, Amd. ~2 Road Correction No. I The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Parcel Nap No. 21769, Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2, Road Correction No. 1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, Rev. #1, Amd. #2, Road Correction #1, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense· If the County falls 'to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule H unless modlfied by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to t~e I~ublic and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the County Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. Easements, when requtred for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive publtc road and uttllty access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Riverside County Surveyor. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a County maintained road, All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 21769, Rev. 11 Amd. t2, Road Correction tl Conditions of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 12. Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 4-e6-ge, 3-12-89. a copy of which is attached. (Amended at Director's Hearing on 3-12-90). The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated 6-27-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 6-29-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. 13. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated 6-22-89, a copy of which is attached. 14. 15. 16. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Sa{ety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated 8-4-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall compiy with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Sectlon's transmittal dated 8-3-89, a copy of which is attached. _ _ The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County Geologist's transmittal dated 11-15-88, a copy of which is attached. GRADING: 17. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habttat Conservation Plan prtor to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as Implemented by County Ordinance or resolution. 18. Grading plans shall conformto the Hillside Development Standards as presented in the Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benching} plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways sh~ll not exceed a 15% grade. TENTAT[VE PARCEL HAP NO. 21769, Rev. #1 Amd. ~2, Road Correction #1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 19. 20. 21. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, conceptual landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for approval. There landscaping plans shall provide large native trees, suitable for raptors use, along the perimeter of areas of land to be graded. These landscaping plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Planning Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. (Amended at Director's Heartng on 3-12-90). Prior to the issuance of a grading permits the location of the large live oak trees, identified in Biological Report No. 266, shall be accurately mapped, and a copy of the map submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for review and filing. The live oak tree, identified in Biological Report No. 266 shall be preserved. The grading plans for developing the project site shall be done with the consultation of a qualified Biologist and shall include the location of the live oak. These grading plans shall provide for the preservation of the live oak as identified in Biological Report No. 266, and, these grading plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for review and approval. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or pePmits from the following agencies: Road Department Riverside County Flood Control Environmental Health Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to t~e Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report done by a qualified Biologist shall be submitted and approved by the Riverside County Planning Department. This report shall address the status of the oak tree which has been required to be preserved. 24. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-R and R-2 zone. 25. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance 460. 26. Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460. 27. Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a certificate of noncontiguous ownership. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, Rev. tl Amd. tl, Road Correction I1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 28. All major rock outcroppings on the subject property should be preserved. Removal 1s permissible only upon the approval of the Planning Director. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 29. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following conditions(s) shall be complied with: am The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Oirector an agreement with CSA 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the recordation of the final map. bm A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS: 29. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final ma~ J delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note shall be placed on the Environmenta] Constraints Sheet. a. "County Archaeological Report No. 1201 was pr~ar~'d 'for this property In September 1986 by Michael K. Lerch & Associates, and 1s on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. " "County Geological Report No. 508 was prepared for this property on August 28, 1986 and September 20, 1988 by Htghland Geotechnlcal Consultants, and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of Interest are potentially active faults and seismic design structures." "County Biological Report No. 266 was prepared for this property in May 1988 by Davtd C, Hawks M.A. and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. TENTAT[VE PARCEL HAP NO. 21769, Rev. Amd. ~2, Road Correction #1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 dm Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject property as of the date of recordation of the final map. 30. The location of the oak tree, identified in County Biological report No. 266 shall be shown on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affect all parcels." RW:bc 3/9/90 TO: FROM: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Building and Safety the owner o.f that property shall obtain a grading permit from the Department of Building and Safety Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Constructing a road, where greater than 5~ cubic yards material is placed or moved, requires a grading permit. Prior ~o occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Depar~tment. Provide verification that the existing gra~ing w~s permitted and-approval to construct' was c~bta~n.ed from the Building and Safety. The Grading Section has no comment on this site. NOTE: 284-13A For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable information from County Grading Forms ~8~-8~ ~8~-E1 Rev. 3189 0o FROM: _~__~lease make the following a condition o~ approval: _a, Prior to commencing any grading exceeding 5~ cubic the owner of that property shall obtain m grading from the Department o~ Building and ~afety ;; I: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of ~uilding and Safety )..~( ~t~,'.:.j;,j~.. p,-F-,...., .... .,. NEXT L~C: permit Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Constructing a road, where greater than 5~ cubic yards of material is placed or moved, requires -a grading permit. Prior to occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this permit, a grading permit and approval of_the grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Provide verification that the existing grading was permitted and approval to construct was obtained from the Building and Safety. ~ ~ ___g. The Grading Section has no comment on this site. NOTE: For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable information from County Grading Forms 28~-8& 284-E1 ~8~-12~ E8~-134 Rev. 3/89 Cou~t3~ o~ DEPART~IT OF HEALTH Planning Deparment Attn: David James l~i~te~side x~.ts,-z'~:~ .T, 1y 'z;, lqR6 Sam Martinez, R.S., Senior Sanitarian - Environmental Health Services Divlaion Parcel Map No. 21769 The Environmental Health Services Division has reviewed the information in regards to the tentative parcel map and would require prior to recordation of the final map, a "will-serve" letter from the appropriate districts concerning sewer and water availability. ~c.,~._ _'~r~;:~ ~:cg GE~N. FORM 4, August 4, 1989 Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Patti Nahill County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Parcel Map 21769, Revision #1, Amendment #2 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for .all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to S/ction 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Very truly yours, . - / Land Use ~hnician /sn RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY GLEN J. NEWMAN FiRE CHIEF 6-22-89 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: TEAM I RE: PM 21769 - REVISED MAP #1 - AMENDED #2 Planning & Engineering Office 4080 Lemon Street, Suite 11 Riverside. CA 92501 (714) 78?-6606 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION - LOTS 1, 2 & 3 No fire protection requirements. FIRE PROTECTION - LOT #4 Lot #4 (tentative tract no. 22294), fire protection requirements will be address when the tract map is reviewed. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. ;,'/~.~.~,&~,~ ~ ·- .-...'~~ MICHAEL E. GRAY, Planning Officer KI=NNE:TH I.. EDWARDS CHIEF ENGINEER 1991 MARKLr!' ITREET F. O, BOX 1033 TItlEPHONE (714) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No.. I Re: Planner P~.~'.~.' /I/~/ ~v,'~e~ M~ ~o.J We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports,". This project is in :the drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with.the applicable r~lesArea _ and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~aveThb~enpr°ject will be constructed i n accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. cc: t~AP PA c_ enior Civil Engineer DATE: J~l,i Z% (eO OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR leroy D. Smoot ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR March 12, 1990 COUNTY ADM~b'TRA~ ~ MAIUNG ADO RF..S5: P.O. BOX I090 RrvT..RSID£, CAL~ORN[A 92502 (714) 787-65,54 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Tentative PM 21769-Revised #1-Amend #2 Road Correction #1 Schedule H - Team 1 - SMD #9 AP #111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, a%l existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design oY t~e'improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. Sufficient right of way along Rainbow Canyon Road shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 100 foot full width right of way. Sufficient right of way along "A" Street shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 66 foot full width right of way. Tentative PM 21769 - Revised #1 - Amend #2 Road Correction #1 March 12, 1990 Page 2 4a. 10. 11. 12. Rainbow Canyon Road shall be offered for dedication to provide for a 100 foot full width right of way and shall be engineered to a 24 foot graded section centered on the ultimate centerline or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Those portions of existing Rainbow Canyon Road which fall outside the proposed 100 foot dedicated right of way shall be offered for dedication to encompass the existing paved travelled way, plus a 12 foot parkway or as approved by the Road Commissioner. "A" Street shall be offered for dedication to provide for a 66 foot full width right of way and shall be engineered to a 24 foot graded section centered on the ultimate centerline or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° or as approved by the Road Department. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard ~114 of Ordinance 461 or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. The landdivider shall install street name sign(s) in accordance with County Standard No. 816 prior to recordation of the final map as directed by the Road Commissioner. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall comply with Road Department standards and require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet lentative PM 21769 - Revised #1 - Amend #2 Road Correction #1 March 12, 1990 Page 3 format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street improvement plans and shall depict only such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed within the public road rights-of-way. 13. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said Section. Si_ncer ely, Lawrence A. Toerper Road Division Engineer LT:jw April 18, 1988 Board of Directors: Richard D. Steffey President James A. Darby St. Vice President Ralph Daily Doug Kulberg Jon A. Lundin Jeffrey L. Minklet T. C. Rowe Officers: Stan T. Mills General Manager Phillip ~L. Forbes Director o£ Finance - Treasurer Norman L. Thomas Director of Engineering Thomas R. McAliester Director of Operations & Maintenance Barbara J. Reed Director of Adm/n/stration. District Secretary Rutan and Tucker Legal Counsel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Parcel Map 21769 (Revised) Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights,. if any, to RCWD. If RCWD can be of further service to you, please contact this office. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNI~A W_ATER DISTRICT Senga p. Doherty Engineering Services Representative F012/jkm132 Ar ~ qiVr4 iDE COUrt[ ., nnln DEPA::IOTIErl November 1S, 1988 Htghland Sotls Engineering 1832 S. Commercenter Ctrcle, Suite A San Bernardino, California 92408 Attention: Mr. William R. Altamyer Mr. Warren L. Sherltng SUBJECT: Geotechntcal Report Review Job No. 40084-00 Parcel Map No. 2176g (Revised) County Geologic Report No. 508 Rainbow Canyon Area Gentlemen: We have reviewed the geologic, seismic and slope stability aspects of your report entitled 'Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Rainbow Canyon Heights, Rainbow Canyon Road, Riverside County, CA,' dated August 28, 1986, and your 'Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Rainbow Canyon Heights, Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, Riverside County, Ca,' dated September 20, 1988. Your report determined that:' No evidence of recency of faulting was observed along the Willard fault which passes through'the site. A fault shear zone, representing the mtn trace of the Willard fault, trends northwest and is exposed in the borrow site on the property. A Magnitude 7.0 earthquake occurring on the Elsinore Fault Zone in close proximity to the site could produce a peak ground acceleration on the order of 0,719 at the site, ~th the duration of strong ground motion exceeding 30 seconds. 3. The settlement potential under seismic loading conditions for the on-stte materials ts low. 4. The potential for liquefaction at the site is considered low. 5. Cracking of ground at the site due to shaking from seismic events ts not considered a significant hazard and would have a minor tepact on the proposed development. 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 Highland Soils Engineering November 15, 1988 Page 2 6. The natural slopes on the site are considered relatively stable. The predominant Jointing pattern strikes northwest across the site, and dips to the northeast at moderate to high angles with no out-of-slope components noted. 7. But cut and fill slopes were found to have factors of safety in excess of 1.5 static and 1.1 seismic and should be grossly stable in the planned configurations, 8. Erosion of the on-site sandy soils and bedrock should be a significant c,Kern. 9. Difficult ripping and so~ blasting will be required for cuts in excess of 20 feet. Your report recmm~nded that: Building lots astride the Willard Fault Zone must be over-excavated a minimum distance of 5 feet beyond the outer edge of exterior footings and to a depth of at least 3 feet when lots are cut, or fill of less than 2 feet. For proposed structures lying in the Willard Fault Zone, all continuous footings should be tied together with a ~¢ reinforcement bar placed both top and bottom. All cut slopes should have drainage benches at approximately 60 foot vertical intervals..Slopes over go ~eet tn height should have a I2 foot wide bench at approximately mid height. All exposed cut slopes should be observed by the project Engineering ~eologtst during grading. All slopes should be planted with erosion resistant-vegetation or otherwise protected as soon as practical after grading. Butldtng located adjacent to the top or toe of a slope should be set back one half the height of the slope with a minimum setback of $ feet to a mmxtmum of IS feet. 6. There should be a complete overcavatton of 1oose/lo~ strength natural sotls, extsttng ftll sotls, and trash. 7. Subdrainage beneath any canyon ftlls is recommnded, subject to verification durtng gradtng by an engineering geologist. It ts our opinion that the report is prepared tn a competent inner and satisfies the additional Information requested under the Cmltfornta Envtronintal quallty Act raYtaw mnd the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Highland Soils Engineering November 15, 1988 Page 3 We reconmmnd that the following note be placed on the final map prior to its recordation: 'County Geologic Report No. 508 was prepared for this property on August 28, X986 and September 20, X988 by Highland Geotechnical Consultants, and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of interest are potentially active faults and seismic design of structures'. The recommendations made in your report concerning seismic/geologic hazards shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNIN3 DEPARTMENT Roger S. Streeter - Plan ~tng Dtre~tor Steven ~. Kupferman,/ / // Engineering Geologist // · SAK:rd c.c. Ranpac Engineering - Dave James Building & Safety - Norm Lostbom (2) · Team 1 - Greg Neal #20/8/eg ]] astern Ge~eraJ ManaRer O. J~m~ L~ulhlin J~ H. ~n~ Jr. ~ Co~ ~:n~ of ~ut~ C~ifom~ April 14, 1988 Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street,.9th Floor Riverside, California John M. Coudur~s. Presidem Richrural C. I(.~l~... Vic~ Pres~d~m Win. G. Aldrid~ ~ C. Gilber~ Rod~ D. Sicres · - Lo~se C. Ko~rs i: Tr~s~rer Rqer~ M. SUBJECT: TENTATIVE P.g. 21769 The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project(s) relative to the provision of water and sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: X Is not within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area ~Must be annexed to this District's Improvement District No. in order to be eligible to'receive domestic water/sanitary sewer service. Will be required~to construct the following facilities: a.) Water Service b.) Sewer Service Onsite/offsite regionally sized gravity sewers and participate in regional sewer facilities. No sewers allowed now or future along lot lines. Sewer (existing) within 1320'. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF THE DIR.ECTOR PALOMAR. OBSER.VATORY 105-:Z~ This case is within 30 miles of the Palomar Observatory and is therefore within the zone requiring the use of low-pressure sodium vapor lamps fqr street lighting, as stipulated by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. We request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that may be employed on this property be made consistent with the spirit of the decision of the Board of Supervisors which is intended to mitigate the adverse effects such facilities have on ~he astronomical research at Palomar. Beneficial steps to that end include: 1. Use the minimum amount of light needed for the task. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent. direct upward illumination. Turn off lights at 11:00 p.m. (or earlier) unless, in commercial applications, the associated business is open past that time, in which case the lights should be turned off at closing. e Use low-pressure sodium lamps for roadways, walkways, equipment yards, parking lots, security and other similar applications. These lights need not be turned off ~t. 11:00 p.m. For further information,: call (818) 356-4035. Robert J. Brucato Assistant Director PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91t25 TELEPHONE (,,Is) 356-4033 TELEX 6'~$425 CALTECH PSD PL~NIN~ COI~ISSION MINUTES M~Y 20, 1991 City Attorney JOHN CAVANAUGH read Condition 14 into th records, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND, who requesl that Condition 5 be modified to read "shall maintaJ a maximum of 15 parking spaces for the use.", delete Condition 5. COMMISSIONER FAHEY with amendment to the motion. ~S: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None 11. 12. 13. PLOT PLAN 69 (REV.) 11.1 Proposal to add ' an existing antenna south of Front Street OLIVER MUJICA provi( and receiving equipment on Located west of 1-15 and staff report. C~AIRMAN CHINIAE opened ~public hearing at 8:30 JEFF BROWN,//Fast :Developer Ser~ces, 172~1 Shrier Driye, La~ Elsinore, representing~he applicant, was availa~ to answer any questions by~ Commission. ~SSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to close the~ublic hearing ~:40 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91- (ne~) ommending that the City Council approve~ot Plan 69 (Rev.), seconded by COMMISSIONER BLA~ AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey~ ~rd, Hoagland, Chinia~ NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ~ PARCEL MAP 21769, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AMENDED ~3 and REVISED PARCEL MAP 21769 12.1 Proposal' for second extension of time for Parcel Map 21769 to create four parcels on a 91.4 acre site. 13.1 Proposal to create three parcels on a 91.4 acre site. Located on Rainbow Canyon Road, immediately south of Temecula Creek Inn. PCMIN5/20/91 -9- MAY 24, 1991 PLXNNING COMMTSSION MINUTES I(~Y 20, 1991 STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report. C~IRMAN CHINIAEFF opended the public hearing at 8:45 P.M. DAVID JAMES, Ranpac Engineering, 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, concurred with the Conditions of Approval. DEANE MANNING, R Mansur, 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road, Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposal and requested that the following conditions of approval be deleted: Conditions 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 20 and that Condition No. 14 be moved to Condition No. 1. STEVE JIANNINO advised the Commission that the purpose of the map for for financing reasons only. GARY THORNHILL concurred with Mr. Manning and requested to delete Condition numbers 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and modify 12 to read, "wherever feasible". DOUG STEWART stated that staff would recommend leaving Condition No. 18 as is and Condition No. 20 modified to read "An agreement for development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of internal loop roads at the discretion of the City Engineer." COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at 8:55 P.M. and AdoDt Resolution 91-(next) recommending that the City Council approve a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to close the public hearing at 8:55 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Receive and File Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 subject to the Conditions of Approval as modified by staff, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PCMIN5/20/91 -10- MAY 24, 1991 STAFF,"~PORT - PLANNING CIT~' OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1991 Case No.: Parcel Map 21769, Amended No. 3 Recommendation: Prepared By: Scott Wright Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 91- Recommend approval of an Extension of Time for Parcel Map 21769 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: P R OPOSA L: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: - SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Industrial Commercial Properties Industrial Commercial Properties To create four parcels 19.3 acres, 1Lt.3 acres, 19.2 acres, and ~2.1 acres on a 9~,9 acre site. Rainbow Canyon Road immediately South of the Temecula Inn Coif Course, R-R Rural Residential, aad R-2, multiple family dwellings. North: South: East: West: R-R, Rural Residential 2-8 Dwelling units/acre (SWAP) R-R, Rural Residential R-R, Rural Residential Not requested Vacant North: South: East: West: Golf Course Vacant Vacant Vacant A: PM21769 PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: A: PM21769 Size of Site: 94.9 acres N~. of Parcels: 4 (four) Si~ of Parcels: \" Parcel No. 1: 19.3 acres Parcel No. 2: 14.3 acres Parcel No. 3: 19.2 acres Parcel No. 4: 42.1 acres Tentative Parcel Map 21769 was filed in May 1986 concurrently with Plot Plan 9198, a proposal for 320 apartments on a 30 acre portion of Parcel Map 21769, and change of Zone 4704, a request to change the zone from R-R, Rural Residential to R-2 Multiple Family Residential on the same 30 acre portion. Change of Zone 4704 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 9, 1988, and Plot Plan 9198 was approved at the County Planning Director's hearing on July 10, 1987. A Substantial Conformance to Plot Plan 9198 was filed on November 4, 1988 and approved on January 31, 1989. Plot Plan 9198 expired on July 10, 1989 without the commencement of substantial work, and the project is now defunct. Parcel Map 21769 as originally submitted was never approved. An amended Tentative Parcel Map 21769 was submitted on February 6, 1987 in conjunction with Tentative Tract 22294, a 117 lot R-2 Subdivision on Parcel No, 4 of the amended Tentative Parcel Map. On August 21, 1987, Parcel Map 21769 amended No, 3 was approved at the Plannin9 Directors hearing. Tentative Tract 22294 was not pursued, and a letter to City Staff, dated October 31, 1990, confirms the withdrawal of the application. The County Board of Supervisors approved a first extension of time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 on October 12, 1989. Revised Parcel Map 21769 was filed on February 5, 1988 and approved by the County Planning Commission on March 12, 1990. The application was subsequently forwarded to the City of Temecula for council action as a Receive and File item. On April 20, 1990 J. C. Resorts, owner of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course, filed Appeal No. 2 in protest of the County's Tentative approval of Revised Parcel Map 21769. Issues raised by the appellant include inconsistency with area development, potential erosion and significant impacts to landform, major rock outcroppings, and oak trees due to the design of an interior street, and lack of A: PM21769 evidence to support the findings that there is a oea~sonable probability that the project will be istent with the future General Plan and that th'~e is little probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan. Revised Tentative Parcel Map 21769 and Appeal No. 2 were continued off calendar at the City Council hearing of June 26, 1990 to allow staff additional time to review the project and analyze the appeal. On August 10, 1990 a second extension of time request was filed in order to prevent the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map. Subsequently another issue arose regarding the excavation of soil on a portion of the site which was formerly used as a landfill. RanPac Engineering Corporation, the former owner of the property, had obtained landfill soil excavation permits from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the South Coast Air Quality Management District in 1989. In a letter dated June 12, 1990, the lead agency, the County Department of Health Solid Waste Management Local Enforcement Agency (LEA), concurred with RanPac's intent to remove soil from the site pending submittal of an excavation plan. Excavation began prior to approval of an excavation plan and was halted. A letter dated October 26, 1990 from the LEA indicated that an excavation and disposal plan and a permit from The State Department of Health Services to treat soils with a high lead content were still needed. On November 29, 1990 The State Department of Health Services classified the q,000 to 6,000 tons of lead contaminated soil on the site as non-hazardous to health due to mitigating~che~mical characteristics pursuant to Section 66305 (e), Title 22, California Code of Regulations. On January 7, 1991 an excavation plan was submitted. The LEA letter of January 16, 1991 stated that the work plan could not be accepted until the County Environmental Health Services Hazardous Material Branch approved a removal, transport and disposal plan. On January 2~, 1991 the LEA approved a revised work plan. On February 25, 1991 the new owner, Industrial Commercial Properties (ICP) indicated that a complete development package would be submitted to be processed concurrently with the Parcel Map, and that a new street alignment for the site's internal circulation would be provided. ICP later decided to proceed with the Parcel Map prior to the development plans. ICP agreed that the Parcel Map would be strictly a land division for conveyance pu, rposes only, that the proposed interior street Wo~ld be deleted from the Tentative Map, and that no~'ading or site improvements would occur prior to a~3proval of development plans. The deletion of the proposed street resulted in a reduction in the number of proposed parcels from four to three. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: A: PM21769 The applicant requests a second extension of time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 to create four parcels on a 94.9 acre site. The parcel sizes are 19.3 acres, 14.3 acres, 19.2 and 42.1 acres. The extension of time is requested in order to enable the City to process Revised Tentative Parcel Map 21769. Reason for the Extension Request Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 was designed to accommodate Tentative Tract 22294 on a portion of the Parcel Map site. Although the Parcel Map was approved on August 21, 1987 and extended by the Board of Supervisors on October 12, 1989, Tentative Tract 22294 was withdrawn. Revised Parcel Map 21769 was tentatively approved by the County on March 12, 1990 and forwarded to the City as a Receive and File item. Appeal No. 2 protesting the approval was filed by an adjacent property owner for reasons delineated in the background section of this report. On June 26, 1990 the City Council continued Revised Parcel Map 21769 and Appeal No. 2 off calendar to allow staff additional time to review and analyze the issues. The Second Extension of Time request for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 was submitted in order to prevent the expiration of the origi~'al a-pproval which would also render the Revised Parcel Map defunct. The extension of time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 will be scheduled for Public Hearings concurrently with Revised Parcel Map 21769. Revised Parcel Map 21769, if approved, will supersede Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3. The proposed parcels, ranging in size from 14.3 acres to 42.1 acres, are consistent with the applicable minimum lot sizes in the Residential 8-16 dwelling units per acre designation and the Rural Residential Zone. A portion of the site is designated for Commercial Office uses. Ordinance 348 stipulates no minimum lot size in the Commercial Office Zone. ENV I RONMENTA L DETERMI NATION: FINDINGS AND SUPPORTING FACTS: T'l~e County adopted a Negative Declaration for En,'~ironmental Assessment 30828 in conjunction with the'approval of Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3. e The County adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the original approval of Parcel Map 21769. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time in that the lots are of sufficient size to conform to the standards of any zone. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed Parcel Map is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to the size of the parcels and current surrounding development. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning laws. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. ~60, Schedule H. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development due to the fact that the proposal is for the creation of ~ lots with the minimum lot size being 1~.2 acres. The size of the lots will allow appropriate size for future development per~ the current zoning designations. The project does not conflict with any known easements of recorded. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. A: PM21769 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Department Staff recommends that the P~,~,,~ning Commission: 1."\" ADOPT Resolution 91- recommending that the City Council approve a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 based on the findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SW/lb Attachments: Resolution Conditions of Approval Exhibits A. Vicinity Map B. Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3 Revised Parcel Map 21769 A: PM21769 6 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARCEL MAP NO, 21769 AMENDED NO, 3 TO SUBDIVIDE A 94.9 ACRE PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS AT RAINBOW CANYON ROAD IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF TEMECULA CREEK INN GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, RANPAC ENGINEERING filed an extension of time request for Parcel Map No. 21769 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on May 20, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WH ER EAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty 130) months following incorporation. During that 30-mon_th period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general I~lan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. A: PM21769 7 A: PM21769 b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General. Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter '~SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1} The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan, (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Parcel Map No. 21769 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. { 1 ) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. ~60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. b! c) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development, e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdj,ctioz~.. (2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: a) The County adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the original approval of Parcel Map 21769. b) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time in that the lots are of sufficient size to conform to the standards of any zone. A: PM21769 There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed Parcel Map is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to the size of the parcels and current surrounding development. d) The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning laws. The project conforms to the currently zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. 460, Schedule E. e) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development due to the fact that the proposal is for the creation of 4 lots with the minimum lot size being 14.2 acres. The size of the lots will allow appropriate size for future development per the current zoning designations. f) The project does not conflict with any known easements of recorded. g! The lawful conditions stated in the project~s Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. proposed is community. g) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. As conditioned pursuant to SEdaTION-3, the Parcel Map compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicated that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, was adopted by the County on August 21, 1987. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of a Second Extension of time for Parcel Map No.21769, Amended 3, for the subdivision of a 94.9 acre parcel into 4 parcels located at Rainbow Canyon Road immediately South of Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. A:PM21769 10 SECTION 4. PASSED, APPROVEID~.ND ADOPTED this Z0th day of May, 1991. DENNIS CH1NIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PM21769 11 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDL~.ONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No: 21769 Amended No. 3 Project Description: To create ~ parcels on a 9[t.9 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-230-005, 006 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule H, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be a~proved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. e The Second Extension of Time will expire four years after the original approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance q60. The expiration date is August 21, 1991. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. e Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: ae All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. be All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. A: PM21769 12 o 10. 11. 12. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No~. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should O~'c~nance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Pt,~n prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concernin9 Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and Jot security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Any oak trees removed with four (~4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by tha Planning Director. Prior to issuance of permits for grading, construction, or improvements on the site, a work plan for the disposal of contaminated soils resulting from previous waste disposal operations conducted on the site shall be approved by the County solid Waste Management Local Enforcement Agency ( LEA ) and shall be implemented to completion and all required post-excavation clearance shall be obtained from LEA and the regional air and water quality agencies. No grading, construction or site improvements shall occur prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. A: PM21769 13 En.qineerinq Department . The following are the Engineeri Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at n~ cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. These conditions shall either supplement or replace as noted all conditions of the original Tentative Map approval and subsequent amendments. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 15. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 16. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 17. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and Parks and Recreation Department. 18. All road easements and/or street dedications shall b~ offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. 19. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 20. A development agreement shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. 21. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. A: PM21769 14 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CRADI, ~J~ PERMITS: 22. Prior to issuance of a gradin~jpermit on any parcel, a formal development plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for formal development review processing. 23. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for any parcel, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the El R/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. A: PM21769 15 RZVERSZ~ CC)U?ffY PLANND':t; I~PART~I£h'I' COIqDTTZOtJS OF APPROVAL ' TENTATZVE PARCEL K~ I~. 21769 Amd. NO. 3 1. The subdivider st, all defend, tnd~**--ntfy, and hold h~mless the Cqunty of Riverside, its agar. Ls, offtc.~rs, and e...--pioyees frc.a any Claim, actlon, or proceedi~j agMnst t.~,e County of Rtverstd.~ or 1rs a,~.~nts, offtc.~rs, or e~loyees ~ attacl, ~t ~s~de, votd, or annul on a~:~val of the ~unty of Riverside, 1~ cdvisory agencies, e:peal ~:ar~s or leglslottve ~Uy concerntn~ P.~. S'1769 ~-~.~3 , ~tch action ts b~ught ~tthin ~m ttne ~ert~ ;roviU:d ;or in C:~i~*omia fowrn~nt ~e $)ctton 6~';~9.37. ~e unty of Riversiris trill ;==~tly c~ttfy =t~ su~aivi:~r of ~ny suc~ clat~, lotion, or p~c~Gding :~atnst the Ccunty of ~iversida and will cocperate fully tn the d~fcr~se. Zf ~qe ~unty fails to prorotly notify the subdivider of any su~ clai~, octton, or ~coeding or fails ~ coopera~ fully tn ~e defen~e, the s=~dtvid~r shall ~ot, ~e~after, be ~sponstble ~ defend, tnd~ntfy, or hold hapless ~e ~unty of Riverside. ~. ~e ~n~ttve ~)arcel ~ap shall confo~ to the ~qut~en~ of Ordinance 4~0, ~h~ule H unless ~dtft~ by the conditions ltstod below. This mpp~v~ tenta'cive pmrcel rip ~iI1 expire ~ )~ars after the app~val --* dl~ of 8-21-87 unless extended as p~vid~ by ~dtnmnce 460. 3. The fin~l r4p shall be prepared by a registered clvt1 engineer or 1tcensed land surveyor subject. to all the re~Jtr~nts of the State of ¢altfomtm ..... Subdivision Hap Act, Riverside ~unty Sunivision Ordinance 460. 4. All mad ems~nts shall ~ offered for dedication ~publtc and shall continue tn fqrce unttl the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free fr~m all encumbrances as approved by the County Road Comtsstoner. Street naees shall be subject to approval of the Road Ccr~sstoner. S. Easements, when required for roadray slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shom on the etna1 mp if wtthtn the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by t~e Riverside County Surveyor. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided frog the parcel mp boundary to a County mtntetned road. 7. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the ftnal map. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. Conditions of Approval Page 21769 Amd. t3 Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Unifom Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety. The subdivider shall comply with the street 'improvement recon~endattons outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 7-31-87, a copy of ~htch is attached. 10. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recor:nendattons outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated 7-Z4-87 & 7-3-86 a copy of which is attached. 11. The subdivider shall cc~ply with the flood control rec .O~Tnendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 7-30-87 & 7-26-86 a copy of which is attached. If the land div4sion lies within an adopted f~ooa control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Ccn~nissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel ~ap. 12. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement reccmnendations out- lined in the County Fire Depar~ent's letter dated 8-3-87 , a copy of which is attached. 13. The applicant shall c~ply with the Department of Building.and Safety letter dated 10-2-86, a copy of which is attached. GRADIt(G Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as presented in the Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten~eet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benthing) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exeed a IS: grade. - ........ AGENCIES 15. All proposed construction shall comply with the California institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recon~endations dated 7-18-86, a copy of which is attached, and in compliance with the Lamp Type and Shielding Guidelines. TENTATZYE PARCEL I~AP NO. 21769 ~ ~3 Conditions of Approval ' Page -3- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 16. NO butldtng permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provides evidence of c=pliance with public facility financing measures. A cash Sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library development. 17. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the develop- ment standards of the R-R/R-Z zone. 18. Prior to the recordation of the final cap, Change of Zone No. 4704 shall be adopted by the Board of Supervisors. ENVIRO)~ENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET C::IDITIO)(S 19. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Oepartment for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the ....... Oepartment of Building and Safety. 20. The fo]lowtng note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palc~ar Ob- servatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operation at the Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium l'amp~that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through the luminare." KK:bc 6/25/87 ) A~: DavidJ~s San Haninez, R.$., ~enior Sanitarian - Envircrmen~aI Heai~h Services Divisiorl Parcel Pap No., The Envir~i~en?-~! ~al~h Services Division .h.as reviewed r~e i~ormtion in regards to ~h,- ten~ive psrcel ?.~p and ~-ould require prior ~o recordsr_ion of '~.~ fir. al r.:o, a '%ill-serve" letter ~rc'n ~ ~~:cl.~ ~.app_roprza~e 6is~.-'icr. s ccnc~rnir~ se~er and ~acer availability. HRE DEPARTMENT IN COI~.RATION WITH THE . GAUFOI~IIA~EPARTMENT OF FORESTRY CHIEF ~-3-87 21769 - AtfEHDED 13 #Lth respect to ~he conditions o£ aI~P~oval for ~e ~ referenced l~d division, ~e Fire DepoSit re~e~s ~e folZov~ng ft~e ~rotec~ton mea~es ~ p~v/d~ in ac~d~ce vi~ ~vers~de Co~W O~dtn~ces ~d/or r~z~ f~ p~tectton F/R.~ PROTI~TI:ON - ~ 1, 2 G 3 No £tre pzotectton recB~ire~ente. !/xg ~o,~zo~ - ~oT t4 Lot. 14 (tentat/re tract no.' 22294), £1re pz~tectton re~Lre=ente v~n ~e tract ~p ~s ~1 ~st/ons r~dXng ~e m~tng o~ Flze Depar~nt Pi~ ~d'gng~n~ing NZCHAELE. ~--RA¥, Plann~n~O£~Lcer auly 22° 1986 Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Rive=side, California 92501-3657 Subject= Water Availability Reference: Parcel Map 21769 Rainbow Canyon Road Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within 'the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service therefore would be available upon financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which precludes the drilling of private wells. If RCWD can be of further service please contact this office. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT to you,. Senga P. Doherty Engineering Services Representative FO12 '" RIV6~.~:~: u~u~TY '- 4.. .- .~.. ~.%:~.~ 1~ ~: ..... -~' - '~"°'~ -L-~ ....... a~.lil~t .... .~ .~.,.:..~. . ~.~..,-.. ,.. -%~.-:~.. ..~.~?.___.~...~ ~.:..~.~. =._.. ~ -. . ............ R A N C H O C A L ! F O Pt N I A W A T g R 'D:I 28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA. CA92390-1674 · 714 676-4101 '"~ .... "~-'~'"'~---~' · ~' '-' ..r r _--:o.-%. ,~--:=.--.; .... · .... '.' · . -= .......... .T-%~> :. L,~r:-'..~.~:9~'. !aRoy D. Smoot ~uly 31, 1987 Riverside County Planntng Comtsston 4080 Lenon Street Riverside, CA 92501 i~: Parcel Map 21769 - Amend Schedule )4 - Team I ~dtes and Gentlmmen: · With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced tentative landdivision ~ap, the Road Depar~ent reco~nends that the landdivider provide the following road dedications in accordance with Ordinance No. 460. It is understood that the Tentative Map correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their omission ~ay require the map t~ be resubmitted for further consideration. All questions regarding the true n~aning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Ccm~issioner's Office. · ~ufftctent right of way along Rainbow Can~on Road shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 50 foot half width right of way and a 100 foot full width right of way at a grade and alignment as approved by the R~ad Department. .... Streets 'A' thru '£' shall be lmproved with 24 feet of Class 3, Aggregate Base (0.33' thick) on a 32 foot graded section within a 60 foot full width dedicated right of way at e grade and aligr..qent as approved by the Road Department~ 0 Comer cutbacks in conformance with Count~ Standard No. 605 shall be shown on the final ~p. Prtor to the recordation of the ftnal map, or the granting of a waiver of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Depart- merit, a cash sum of $160.00 per lot as mitigation for trmfftc signal impacts. The traffic signal mitigation for panel 3 shall b~ ~st~n~ until The time of development. Parcot Hal:) 21769 - Amend 31, 1987 S. The mxtau, centerline grad?ent shall no~ exceed 1SS. · -.-''-'6. ~e :~ntm~ centtithe tad11 shall ~ as app~ved by .. 7. All c,~nterllne tnters~ttons shall ~ at 90* or as app~?~ by the ~ad ~par~nt. ~.prov~.~ent plans shall be based upon a centerline pro¢11¢ extending a mtntr..u.,~ of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and a119r=enC as approve! by the Riverside County Road Co~,~nJssloner. CompletSon of road tmprove,,-,ents does not imply acceptance for ~atntenance* b~ County. Landdivisions creattng cut or ftll slopes adjacent to the streets shall provtde eroston controlo stght dtstance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Oepartment. 10. . 14457 (P.H. 77/71-75). Thts parcel map shall be coordinated vlth Parcel ~ap &H:lh ¥ery truly yours, Gus Xugnes Road 01vtston Eng*lneer ~ 01 TNI O~e!CTOI PALOIdAE Oll[IVATOIT 33cL0 case is VichVn 30 niles of the Palomar Observatory and Jt therefore ~thin the zone requi~n~ the ~e of l~pressure sodi~ vapor l~os fo~ ocrtee 1/8hC~j, u 8cip~ced by ~a ~verside ~cy ~ard of Sup~sors. Ve request chic the design for other t~pes of outdoor ll2hcin~ that ~ay be enployed on Ch~ pro~er~ be =~e c~sisCeuC ~ch the opine of the dakin of the ~ard of S~pe~isors vhich is intended Co ~Ci~ace the ~verse effects Kepo co chic ~d ~ude~ Use the-~t~--- ~ounC of llAht nteded for the t&sk. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent direct upvard i11,~tnaclon. 3. ~rrn off li&hts at 11:00 p.n. (or earlier) unless, Lu co=nercial applications, the usociaced business is open past chic tins, in~i~ ~e the lights oho~d be cu~ed off at CIDSinS. Use lob-pressure sodiun la~ps for roadways, valkvave, equilneat yards, paring lots, securi~ ~d other ni~lar applicaci~. ~ese li~ts need not ~ tu~ed off ac ~:00 p.m. For further information, call (818) 356-&035. JUL 21 198;; RIVEI'{~'. c: ~u ~TY PLANNIk.o DEPARTMENT lobeFt 3. Brucato Assistant Director ~11ff NINm \ JUL 3O RIVE.~',..c PLANNING DEPARTMENT Re: P!~ 2. t ."/,~ "1 Riverside County Planntng Department County Admt nt stratt ve Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team rio. Area: R(;~.~, (~"~7' ve have reviewed this case and have the following co~ents: RIVI.=I~$1OE COUN1L~ FI. OOO CONTROL WATEJ~ CONSERVATION DISTRIC'r Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the projec': is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of ~nusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well deftned ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an envtron,~ental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be trloodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobtle home supports." Thts project ts tn the dratnage plan fees shall be paid tn accordance w~th the applicable r~lesArea and regulations .......... The proposed zoning ts consistent with existing flood hazards. Some t'lood control facilities or t'ioodproofing may be required to fully develop to the t~plted density. .. The Otstrict's report dated ts sttll current for this project. The Otstrtct does not object to the proposed minor change. The attached co~nents apply. Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EOWAROS ~ tel E7in~er~/¢ sOHH H. KASHUBA entor Civil Engineer CITY,OF TEMECULA ,% VICINITY MAP · ,--$ I-T.E CASE NO. P~'I P.C. DATE 5'/ I II ,,.-S I T.E VICINITY MAP .--) CASE NO. I>~ ~'~r.q C.C. DATE 7/2 /~l Z~1 ..I. . =*~--- mi' ~ t'~J J r~'..~ '~I . APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SU BJ ECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department July 2. 1991 Appeal No. 2 PREPARED BY: R ECOMMEN DAT I ON: Scott Wright Staff recommends that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution 91- sustaining in part and denying in part the Appeal of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 by adding Conditions of Approval to the approval of the map by the County Planning Commission. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: REQUEST: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: J.C. Resorts Project Design Consultants The appellant requests that the City Council reverse the County's tentative approval of Revised Parcel Map 21769. The subject of the appeal is a Revised Tentative Parcel Map to create 3 parcels, 17.7 acres, 43.7 acres, and 30 acres in size on a 91.4 acre site. Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of the Temecula Inn Golf Course. Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 was filed on February 5, 1988, and approved by the County Planning Commission on March 12, 1990. The application was subsequently forwarded to the City of Temecula for action as a Receive and File item. On April 20, A :PM21769 APPEAL2.AR 1 1990, J. C. Resorts filed Appeal No. 2 in protest of the County's tentative approval of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769. Issues raised by the appellant include inconsistency with area development, and potentially significant impacts on landform which could result in substantial erosion of the site and removal of major rock outcroppings and oak trees due to the design of an interior street. The appellant also stated that there is a lack of evidence that the project has a reasonable probability of being consistent with the future General Plan. Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769 and Appeal No. 2 were continued off calendar at the City Council hearing of June 26, 1990 to allow Staff additional time to review the project and analyze the appeal. Subsequently, it was decided to process the Revised Parcel Map as a land division for conveyance purposes only. Approval of the Revised Parcel map is subject to the condition that no permits for grading, improvements, or construction will be issued prior to approval of development plans for the site. At the Planning Commission hearing of May 20, 1991 the Appellant's representative spoke in favor of approval of Revised Parcel Map 21769 as Amended to delete the interior road and to create three parcels rather than four as shown on Revised Parcel Map 21769 as the County had tentatively approved it. The appellant's support of the Revised Parcel Map was subject to the understanding that. Staff's recommendation and the conditions of Approval addressed the following points: That the Parcel Map is for financing purposes only and does not authorize any grading, improvements, or development; That the version of Revised Parcel Map 21769 as tentatively approved by the County is declared defunct; That all future site development is subject to public hearings; and That J. C. Resorts continues to hold that there are significant potential issues which may arise in connection with development of the proposed parcels. A: P~1769 APPF. J~.,2. AR 2 The appellant's representative also expressed concern that the language of certain Conditions of Approval created ambiguity by referring to improvements not authorized by the approval of the Revised Parcel Map. Revised Parcel Map 21769 was approved by a vote of 5-0 subject to the Conditions of approval which the Commission revised as follows: Condition No. 5, regarding subdivision phasing, Condition No. 6, regarding installation of landscaping, Condition No. 7, regarding payment of fees prior to grading, Conditions 9 and 10, regarding utilities, and Conditions No. 12, regarding replacement of trees removed, were deleted. These conditions were intended to apply to subsequent development of the site but were eliminated because Condition No. lq prohibits grading, construction or site improvements prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. Condition No. 11 regarding preservation of trees was amended by deleting the words "wherever feasible." Condition No. 20, now Condition No. lq was amended to read as follows: An agreement for the development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. Due to the filing of Appeal No. 2, Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 is no longer being processed as a Receive and File item. Action on Appeal No. 2 will constitute an action on Revised Parcel Map No. 21769. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution 91- sustaining in part and denying in part the Appeal of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 by adding Conditions of Approval to the approval of the map by the County Planning Commission. [)121769 i~?~.~L~.~ 3 SW: ts Attachments: Resolution Additional Conditions of Approval for Revised Parcel Map No, 21769 Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report for Revised Parcel Map No, 21769 Exhibits A, Vicinity Map B, Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 A: PM21769 APPFAL2.AR 4 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUSTAI N I NG I N PART AND DENY I NG I N PART THE APPEAL OF REVISED PARCEL MAP NO. 21769 BY ADDING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAP BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, J. C. Resorts Group filed Appeal No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on July 2, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Appeal; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE City Council OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. -~- ~:PN21769 ~PPE~i2.~A 1 {b) ..... There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, B, The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan, C, The proposed Revised Parcel Map is inconsistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1} The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan, (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects pursuant to this title. each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Revised Parcel Map No, 21769 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, D. (1) Pursuant to Ordinance 460 Section 7.1, a land division may be denied if any of the following findings can be made: a) The proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans b) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage A:PM21769 APPFmL2.~a 2 c) The site of the proposed land division is not suitable for the proposed type or intensity of development The City Council makes the following findings, to wit: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. lb) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. (d) The proposed action will not cause environmental damage in that the action does not authorize any grading, improvements, or construction on the site. SECTION 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby sustains in part and denies in part the Appeal of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 by adding Conditions of Approval to the approval of the map by the County Planning Commission. SECTION 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1991. RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR A :PM21769 APPEAL2.RR 3 e Prior to issuance of permits for grading, construction, or improvements on the site, a work plan for the disposal of contaminated soils resulting from previous waste disposal operations conducted on the site shall be approved by the County solid Waste Management Local Enforcement Agency ( LEA ) and shall be implemented to completion and all required post-excavation clearance shall be obtained from LEA and the regional air and water quality agencies. e No grading, construction or site improvements shall occur prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. Enqineerin.q Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. These conditions shall either supplement or replace as noted all conditions of the original Tentative Map approval and subsequent amendments. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. e The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 10. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 11. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; Parks and Recreation Department. 12. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. A: PM21769-A 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS COUNCIL MEMBERS COUNCIL MEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK A:PM21769 APPEAL2.AR 4 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revised Parcel Map No: 21769 Project Description: To create 3 parcels on a91.4 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-230-005, 006 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance L[60, Schedule H, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date· Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 will expire four years after the original approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is August 21, 1991. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66t[99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense· If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. A: PM21769-A 1 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. An agreement for the development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. 15. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements, 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on any parcel, a formal development plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for formal development review processing. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 17. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 18. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. ~ A: PM21769-A 3 PL~NIN~ COMMISSION MINUTES M~Y 20, 1991 City Attorney JOHN C&VANAUGE read Condition 14 into the records, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND, who reques that Condition 5 be modified to read "shall mainta: a maximum of 15 parking spaces for the use.", ~n delete Condition 5. COMMISSIONER FAHEY concurt with amendment to the motion. : 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 11. PLOT PLAN 69 (REV 12. 13. 11.1 Proposal to add an existing south of Front and receiving equipment on Located west of 1-15 and OLIVER MUJICA provi 2 staff report. CHAIRMAN CHI] opened t~ public hearing at 8:30 P.M. ~ JEFF BROWN/ Developer Se~ices, 17281 Shrier Drive, ~e Elsinore, represe.nting~he applicant, was availab/ ~ to answer any questions b~he Commission. CO ZB/S ONE~ HOAGLAND moved to .close the public hearing at :40 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91- (~xt) that the City Council approv~ Plot .Plan . 69 (Rev.), AYES: 5 NOES: 0 seconded by COMMISSIONER B~t~. COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey,~Ford, Hoagland, Chin~ff COMMISSIONERS: None ~ PARCEL MAP 21769, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME ~%MENDED #3 and REVISED PARCEL HAP 21769 12.1 Proposal for second extension of time for Parcel Map 21769 to create four parcels on a 91.4 acre site. 13.1 Proposal to create three parcels on a 91.4 acre site. Located on Rainbow Canyon Road, immediately south of Temecula Creek Inn. PCMINS/20/91 -9- MAY 24, 1991 ..... PL~qNING CO~MISSION MINUTES I~Y 20, :1.991 STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report. C~IRMAN CHINIAEFF opended the public hearing at 8:45 P.M. DAVID JAMES, Ranpac Engineering, 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, concurred with the Conditions of Approval. DEANE MANNING, R Mansur, 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road, Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposal and requested that the following conditions of approval be deleted: Conditions 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 20 and that Condition No. 14 be moved to Condition No. 1. STEVE JIANNINO advised the Commission that the purpose of the map for for financing reasons only. GARY THORNHILL concurred with Mr. Manning and requested to delete Condition numbers 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and modify 12 to read, "wherever feasible". DOUG STEWART stated that staff would recommend leaving Condition No. 18 as is and Condition No. 20 modified to read "An agreement for development of a loop road shall be executed for construction of internal loop roads at the discretion of the City Engineer." COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at 8:55 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91-¢next) recommending that the City Council approve a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing at 8:55 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Receive and File Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 subject to the Conditions of Approval as modified by staff, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PCMIN5/20/91 -10- MAY 24, 1991 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1991 Case No.: Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 Prepared By: Scott Wright Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 based on the Findings contained in this report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT ION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Industrial Commercial Properties Industrial Commercial Properties To create 3 parcels 17.7 acres, 43.7 acres, and 30 acres in size on a 91.4 acre site. Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of the Temecula Inn Golf Course. R-R (Rural Residential) and R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) North: R-R (Rural Residential) South: 2 to 8 Dwelling Units/Acre (SWAP) East: R-R (Rural Residential) West: R-R ( Rural Residential) Not requested. Vacant North: South: East: West: Golf Course Vacant Vacant Vacant A: PM21769-A PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: A: PM21769-A Size of Site: No. of Parcels: Size of Parcels: 91.4 acres 3 17.7 acres, 30acres, and 47.7 acres Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769 was filed in May, 1986 concurrently with Plot Plan No. 9198, a proposal for 320 apartments on a 30 acre portion of Parcel Map No. 21769, and Change of Zone No. 4704, a request to change the zone from R-R, Rural Residential, to R-2, Multiple Family Residential, on the same 30 acre portion. Change of Zone No 4704 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 9, 1988, and Plot Plan No. 9198 was approved at the County Planning Director's hearing on July 10, 1987. A Substantial Conformance to Plot Plan No. 9198 was filed on November 4, 1988 and approved on January 31, 1989. Plot Plan No. 9198 expired on July 10, 1989 without the commencement of substantial work, and the project is now defunct. Parcel Map No. 21769, as originally submitted, was never approved. An amended Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769 was submitted on February 6, 1987 in conjunction with Tentative Tract No. 22294, a 117 lot R-2 subdivision on Parcel No. 4 of the amended Tentative Parcel Map. On August 21, 1987, Parcel Map No. 21769 Amended No. 3 was approved at the Planning Director's hearing. Tentative Tract Map No. 22294 was not pursued, and a letter to City Staff dated October 31, 1990 confirms the withdrawal of the application. The County Board of Supervisors approved a First Extension of Time for Parcel Map No. 21769 Amen~ed%1o; 3 on October 12, 1989. Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 was filed on February 5, 1988 and approved by the County Planning Commission on March 12, 1990. The application was subsequently forwarded to the City of Temecula for Council action as a Receive and File item. On April 20, 1990, J. C. Resorts, owner of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course, filed Appeal No. 2 in protest of the County's tentative approval of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769. Issues raised by the appellant include inconsistency with area development, potential erosion and significant impacts to landform, major rock outcroppings and oak trees due to the design of an interior street, and lack of evidence to support the findings that there is a reasonable probability that the project will be A: PM21769-A consistent with the future General Plan and that there is little probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan. Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769 and Appeal No. 2 were continued off calendar at the City Council hearing of June 26, 1990 to allow Staff additional time to review the project and analyze the appeal. On August 10, 1990, a Second Extension of Time request was filed in order to prevent the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map. Subsequently, another issue arose regarding the excavation of soil on a portion of the site which was formerly used as a landfill. Ranpac Engineering Corporation, the former owner the property, had obtained landfill soil excavation permits from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the South Coast Air Quality Management District in 1989. In a letter dated June 12, 1990, the lead agency, the County Department of Health, and Solid Waste .Management Local Enforcement Agency (LEA), concurred with Ranpac's intent to remove soil from the site pending submittal of an excavation plan. Excavation began prior to approval of an excavation plan and was halted. A letter dated October 26, 1990 from the LEA indicated that an excavation and disposal plan and a permit from the State Department of Health Services to treat soils with a high lead content were still needed. On November 29, 1990, the State Department of Health Services classified the ~,000 to 6,000 tons of lead contaminated soil on the site as non-hazardous to health due to mitigating chemical characteristics pursuant to Section 66305(e), Title 22, California Code of Regulations. O~ January 7, 1991 an excavation plan was submitted. The LEA letter of January 16, 1991, stated that the work plan could not be accepted until the County Environmental Health Services Hazardous Material Branch approved a removal, transport, and disposal plan. On January 24, 1991, the LEA approved a revised work plan. On February 25, 1991, the new owner, Industrial Commercial Properties (ICP) indicated that a complete development package would be submitted to be processed concurrently with the Parcel Map, and that a new street alignment for the site's internal circulation would be provided. ICP later decided to proceed with the Parcel Map prior to the development plans. ICP agreed that the Parcel Map would be strictly a land division for conveyance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: purposes only, that the proposed interior street would be deleted from the Tentative Map, and that no grading or site improvements would occur prior to approval of development plans. The deletion of the proposed street resulted in a reduction in the number of proposed parcels from four to three. The proposal is to create three parcels on a 91.4 acre site. The parcel sizes are 17.7 acres, 43.7 acres, and 30 acres, respectively. The proposed Parcel Map is a land division for conveyance purposes only and does not involve any grading or construction of improvements. Relationship Between Parcel Map 21769, Extension of Time and Revised Parcel Map 21769 Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 was continued off calendar by the City Council and has been on hold for various reasons delineated in the Background Section of this report. The request for a Second Extension of Time for Parcel Map No. 21769 Amended No. 3 was filed in order to prevent the expiration of the original approval which would also render the Revised Parcel Map defunct. The Extension request and the Revised Parcel Map will go to hearing concurrently. Revised Parcel Map No. 21769, if approved, will supersede Parcel Map No. 27169 Amended No. 3. Appeal No. 2 J. C. Resorts, the owner of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course filed Appeal No. 2 in protest of the County's tentative approval of-Revised Parcel Map No. 21769. The stated grounds of the Appeal are summarized below: The proposed Parcel Map is inconsistent with area development, especially regarding the design of Street "A" (Street "A" has been deleted from the Revised Parcel Map). e The project, especially the design of Street "A", will have a significant effect on the environment· e No evidence is provided to support the findings of probable consistency with the future General Plan. A: PM21769-A 4 e e Drainage and erosion control measures will alter the design and increase the grading impacts of Street Increased grading impacts are not conducive to the preservation of an oak tree cited in the biological assessment, or to the preservation of major rock outcroppings or natural drainage courses, and will result in significant visual impacts and possible changes in parcel boundaries. The Tentative Map should show the elevation of existing streets (Rainbow Canyon Road). The Parcel Map does not show the extent of work being conditioned to realign Rainbow Canyon Road. Because of steep slopes and riparian habitat, Parcel 1 should be represented as an open space easement. Land Division For Conveyance Purposes Only Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 is being processed as a land division for conveyance purposes only. Street "A~', which was shown on Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 as tentatively approved by the County, has been deleted, resulting in the consolidation of the two parcels formerly separated by Street "A". It shall be a Condition of Approval of the Revised Parcel Map that no permits for grading, improvements, or any other disturbance of the site will be issued prior to appreval of development plans for the site, i.e., approval of a Plot Plan or a Conditional Use Permit. Issues To Be Addressed In Conjunction With Site Development Proposals In processing the proposed Parcel Map purely as a land division for conveyance purposes, Staff is not denying that there are significant potential issues which will arise in connection with site development. These issues can be clarified and addressed more thoroughly in the context of site development proposals which will include greater detail regarding street alignments, grading, drainage, etc. Staff will address the following concerns when site development proposals are submitted: A: PM21769-A Suitability of site terrain for the proposed use. Grading impacts on natural drainage courses, large rock outcroppings, and oak trees. Adequacy of proposed drainage facilities and erosion control measures. Proposed street alignments, including intersections with Rainbow Canyon Road and sight line distances. 5. Traffic impacts. 6. Stability of man-made slopes. Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent uses. A: PM21769-A Landfill Excavation and Closure The northerly portion of the site has been used as a domestic solid waste dump site. The dump site is no longer active and is subject to the closure requirements of the State, the County Local Enforcement Agency, and recjional air and water quality agencies. Permits for excavation of the landfill site have been obtained, and the excavation has been conducted. Excavation procedures were monitored by the County Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency and the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Team. Excavated soil has been stockpiled on site-in accordance with the approved work plan and soil samples have been taken. Soil test results will indicate whether the excavation is complete and whether the excavated soils may remain on the site or should be disposed in a Class 1 Landfill. The major concern is the lead content of the soil. It shall be a Condition of Approval for Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 that no permits for grading, site improvements, or construction shall be issued until the landfill excavation and closure procedures are complete and the County Environmental Health Services, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego. and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have issued clearances indicating that the work has been completed in a satisfactory manner GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: and the site no longer poses a threat to public health or the environment. The proposed parcels, ranging in size from 17.7 acres to 43.7 acres, are consistent with the applicable minimum lot sizes in the Residential 8-16 dwelling units per acre designation and the Rural Residential zone. A portion of the site is designated for commercial office uses. Ordinance 348 stipulates no minimum lot size in the Commercial Office zone. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINGS AND SUPPORTING FACTS: The County adopted a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 32434 in conjunction with the approval of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769. The County adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the original approval of Parcel Map No. 21769. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time in that the lots are of sufficient size to conform to the standards of any zone. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed Parcel Map is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No, 460, Schedule H. The proposed Parcel Map will not have a significant detrimental impact on the environment in that the map is a land division for conveyance purposes only and no permits for grading, improvements, or any development related disturbance to the site will be issued prior to the completion of landfill closure requirements and approval of site development plans. A: PM21769-A o e e e 10. 11. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic. The design of the subdivision is such that it is not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: SW: ks Attachments: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in this report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Resolution Conditions of Approval Exhibits A. Vicinity Map B. Revised parcel Map No. 21769 A: PM21769-A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 91- ..___ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF REVISED PARCEL MAP NO. 21769 TO SUBDIVIDE A 91.4 ACRE PARCEL INTO 3 PARCELS AT RAINBOW CANYON ROAD IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF TEMECULA CREEK INN GOLF COURSE. WHEREAS, Ranpac Engineering filed Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on May 20, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pu~.suant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. Outing that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a genera~pla~ be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. A: PM21769-A b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter 'mSWAP~') was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a redsenable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c! The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. L~60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. A: PM21769-A 10 b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development, d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdietio~. - {2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: a! The County adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the original approval of Parcel Map No. 21769. b) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time in that the lots are of sufficient size to conform to the standards of any zone. A: PM21769-A 11 c) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed Parcel Map is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan. d) The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. 460, Schedule E. e) The proposed Parcel Map will not have a significant detrimental impact on the environment in that the map is a land division for conveyance purposes only and no permits for grading, improvements, or any development related disturbance to the site will be issued prior to the completion of landfill closure requirements and approval of site development plans. f) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. g) The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. h! All lots have acceptable access to existing dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic. i) The design of the subdiv4sion is such that it is not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. j) The lawful conditions stated in the projectis Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. A: PM21769-A 12 SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicated that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was adopted by the County. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 for the subdivision of a 91.4 acre parcel into 3 parcels located at Rainbow Canyon Road immediately south of Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNI NG COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PM21769~A 13 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revised Parcel Map No: 21769 Project Description: To create 3 parcels on a 91.4 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-230-005, 006 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance z~60, Schedule H, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 will expire four years after the original approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is August 21, 1991. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. e Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval· Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. A: PM21769-A e 10. 11. 12, 13, Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No, 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance, Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents. officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents. officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No, 21769, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99,37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense, If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify. or hold harmless the City of Temeculao All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Any oak trees removed with four (it) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten 110) to one { 1 ) basis as approved by the Planning Director. Prior to issuance of permits for grading, construction, or improvements on the site, a work plan for the disposal of contaminated soils resulting from previous waste disposal operations conducted on the site shall be approved by the County solid Waste Management Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) and shall be implemented to completion and all required post-excavation clearance shall be obtained from LEA and the regional air and water quality agencies. No grading, construction or site improvements shall occur prior to approval of specific development plans for the site. A: PM21769-A 15 Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. These conditions shall either supplement or replace as noted all conditions of the original Tentative Map approval and subsequent amendments. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 15. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 16. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 17. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 18. - Rancho California Water District; - Eastern Municipal Water District; - Riverside County Flood Control district; - City of Temecula Fire Bureau; - Planning Department; - Engineering Department; - Riverside County Health Department; - CATV Franchise; - Parks and Recreation Department. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be~ffered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. 19. 20. 21. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. A development agreement shall be executed for construction of the internal loop road as directed by the City Engineer. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City~s CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. A: PM21769-A 16 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on any parcel, a formal development plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for formal development review processing. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 23, A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. A: PM21769-A 17 e m PLANNING DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL DATE: 3-12-90 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO 21769, Rev. ~1, A~I. ~2 Road Correction No. I The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2, Road Correction No. 1. The subdivider shall defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or Its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, tts advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 21769, Rev· #1, Amd. #2, Road Correction #1, which action is brought within the ttme period provided for In California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully In the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule H unless modified by the conditions listed below· This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460· The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or 1tcensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to t4ne public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the County Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land dtviston boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Riverside County Surveyor. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a County maintained road. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, Rev. al Amd. ~2, Road Correction ~1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety. 10. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 4-~$-96, 3-!2-89. a copy of which is attached. (Amended at Director's Hearing on 3-12-90). 11. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated 6-2?-89, a copy of which is attached. 12. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 6-29-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. 13. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated 6-22-89, a copy of which is attached. 14. 15. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated 8-4-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated 8-3-89, a copy of which is attached. ~ - 16. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County Geologist's transmittal dated 11-15-88, a copy of which is attached. GRADING: 17. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County Ordinance or resolution. 18. Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as presented in the Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benching) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways sh~l not exceed a 15% grade. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, Rev. Amd. 12, Road Correction #1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 lg. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, conceptual landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for approval. There landscaping plans shall provide large native trees, suitable for raptors use, along the perimeter of areas of land to be graded. These landscaping plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Planning Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. (Amended at Director's Hearing on 3-12-90). 20. Prior to the issuance of a grading permits the location of the large live oak trees, identified in Biological Report No. 266, shall be accurately mapped, and a copy of the map submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for review and filing. 21. The live oak tree, identified in Biological Report No. 265 shall be preserved. The grading plans for developing the project site shall be done with the consultation of a qualified Biologist and shall include the location of the live oak. These grading plans shall provide for the preservation of the live oak as 1dentilled tn Biological Report No. 266, and, these grading plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department for review and approval. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Department Environmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of 'compliance shall be presented to ~he land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report done by a qualified Biologist shall be submitted and approved by the Riverside County Planning Department. This report shall address the status of the oak tree which has been required to be preserved. 24. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-R and R-2 zone. 25. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.80 of Ordinance 460. 26. Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460. 27. Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a certificate of noncontiguous ownership. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21769, Rev. #1 Amd. #1, Road Correction #1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 28. All major rock outcroppings on the subject property should be preserved. Removal is permissible only upon the approval of the Planning Director. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 29. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following conditions(s) shall be complied with: The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with CSA 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the recordation of the final map. A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. EhWIRONMENTAL CONSTI~AINT SHEET CONDITIONS: 29. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final map., delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. a. "County Archaeological Report No. 1201 was prepared for this property in September 1986 by Michael K. Lerch & Associates, and is on ftle at the Riverside County Planntng Department. " "County Geological Report No. 508 was prepared for this property on August 28, 1986 and September 20, 1988 by Hlghland Geotechntcal Consultants, and 1s on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Speclftc items of Interest are potentially actlve faults and setsmlc design structures." "County Biological Report No. 266 was prepared for this property in May 1988 by David C, Hawks M.A. and 1s on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. TENTATZVE PARCEL HAP NO. 21769, Rev. #1 Nad. 12, Road Correction I1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject property as of the date of recordation of the final map. 30. The location of the oak tree, identified in County Biological report No. 266 shall be shown on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affect all parcels." RW:bc 3/9/90 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Duilding and Safety DATE _~'__Please make the following a condition of approval: X_a. Prior to commencing any grading exceeding 50 cubic .yards, ~' "~7-~ the owner o.f that property shall obtain a grading permit from the Department oT Building and Safety Prior to approval o? this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Constructing a road, where greater than 56 cubic yards material is placed or moved, requires a grading permit. Prior ~o occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shall be obtained from t'he Duilding and Safety Depar.tment. Provide verification that the existing gra~ing w'as permitted and approval to construct' was d~tained from the Building and Safety. The Grading Section has no comment on this site. NOTE: 284-13~ For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable information from County Grading Forms 284-8& ~8~-~1 Rev. 3/8~ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ~'~ . .~ ~. · . . Department of Building and ~afety ~ ....... ~-..~ .....-.. '.'~' _~__Please make the following a condition of approval: _a. Prio~ to commencing any grading exceeding 50 cubic the owner of that property shall obtain a grading from the Department of Building and Safety yards, permit Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Constructing a road, where greater than 50 cubic yards material is placed or moved~ requires -a grading permit. · e o Prior to occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shall be obtained from. the Building and Safety Department. Provide verification that the existing grading ~as permitted and. approval to construct was~3bt. a ined from the Building and Safety. ___g. The Grading Section has no comment on this site. NOTE: For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable information from County Grading Forms 284-8~ 28~-~1 ~84-134 Rev. 3/89 Cou t3 DEPART~,ff. NT OF HEALTH Planning Department Attn: David James Ri e side Sam Martinez, R.S., Senior Sanitarian - Environmental Health Services Division Parcel Map No. 21769 The Environmental Health Services Division has r~vi~ed the information in regards to the tentative parcel map and would require prior to recordation of the final map, a "will-serve" letter from the districts concerning sewer and water availability. ~~;~,. __~app_roprl a~e a :cg GEN. FORM 4. 3/65 August 4, 1989 Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Patti Nahill County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Parcel Map 21769, Revision #1, Amendment #2 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for a. ll on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to S~ction 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Very truly yours, ' - / Land Use LT.e~hnician (._/Y /sn RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPI:RATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF 6-22-89 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: TEAM I PM 21769 - REVISED MAP #1 - AMENDED #2 Planning ~. Engineering Office 4080 Lemon Street. Suite ! 1 Riverside, CA 92501 (714) 787-6606 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION - LOTS 1, 2 & 3 No fire protection requirements. FIRE PROTECTION - LOT #4 Lot #4 (tentative tract no. 22294), fire protection requirements will be addressee when the tract map is reviewed. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. MICHAEL E. GRAY, Planning Officer K~'NNE:'I'H L. £DWARDS CHIEF ENGINEER 1egg MARKET ITRE:E:T F~. O. BOX 1033 Tl'Z [PHONE (714) 7e.?-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. ] Re: Planner ~.f'/.' /V'..'//~T Area: ~'~ bm~ We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: .. Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. v/' The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports~" This project is in ~the Area drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with-the-applicable r~les and regul ati ons. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements )~aveThb~enpr°ject will be constructed i n accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. cc: RAPPA c_ ,tru~~, / 0HN~ ~.~ASHUBA O/Senior Civil Engineer DATE: J~'l Zt (qBi OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR LeRoy D. Smoot ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURV~ZYOR March 12, 1990 COUNTY ADM~B-rRATl%~ Cig~TTR MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1090 RIVF. P, SlD£. CALI,"'ORHIA 92.502 (714) 787-6554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Tentative PM 21769-Revised #1-Amend #2 Road Correction #1 Schedule H - Team 1 - SMD #9 AP #111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, a%l existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be. resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be co~plgmentary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. Sufficient right of way along Rainbow Canyon Road shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 100 foot full width right of way. Sufficient right of way along "A" Street shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 66 foot full width right of way. Tentative PM 21769 - Revised #1 - Amend #2 Road Correction #1 March 12, 1990 Page2 4a. 10. 11. 12. Rainbow Canyon Road shall be offered for dedication to provide for a 100 foot full width right of way and shall be engineered to a 24 foot graded section centered on the ultimate centerline or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Those portions of existing Rainbow Canyon Road which fall outside the proposed 100 foot dedicated right of way shall be offered for dedication to encompass the existing paved travelled way, plus a 12 foot parkway or as approved by the Road Commissioner. "A" Street shall be offered for dedication to provide for a 66 foot full width right of way and shall be engineered to a 24 foot graded section centered on the ultimate centerline or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° or as approved by the Road Department. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461 or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. The landdivider shall install street name sign(s) in accordance with County Standard No. 816 prior to recordation of the final map as directed by the Road Commissioner. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall comply with Road Department standards and require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet Tentative PM 21769 - Revised #1 - Amend #2 Road Correction #1 March 12, 1990 Page 3 format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street improvement plans and shall depict only such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed within the public road rights-of-way. 13. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said Section. Sincerely, Lawrence A. Toerper~~ Road Division Engineer LT:jw April 18, 1988 Board of DirecLots: Richard D. Steffey President James A. Darby St. Vice President Ralph Daily Doug Kulberg Jori A. Lundin Jeffrey L. Minklet T C. Rowe Officers: Stan T. Mills General Manager Phillip .L. Forbes Director of Finance - Treasurer Norman L. Thomas Director of Engineering Thomas R. McAliester Director of Operations & Maintenance Barbara J. Reed Director of Administration - District Secretary Rutan and Tucker Legal Counsel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Parcel Map 21769 (Revised) Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights,. if any, to RCWD. If RCWD can be of further service to you, please contact this office. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNI~A W_ATER DISTRICT Senga P. Doherty Engineering Services Representative F012/jkm132 RANCHO C A L I F"O R N I A WATER D I S T R I C qiV=4 iDE counc.u PL, nnii' DEP, RCI IEnC November 15, 1988 Highland Soils Engineering 1832 S. Commercenter Circle, Suite A San Bernardino, California 92408 Attention: Hr. William R. Altmeyer Mr. Warren L. Sherling SUBJECT: Geotechnlcal Report Review Job No. 40084-00 Parcel Map No. 21769 (Revised) County Geologic Report No. 508 Rainbow Canyon Area Gentlemen: We have reviewed the geologic, seismic and slope stability aspects of your report entitled 'Preliminary Geotechntcal Investigation, Rainbow Canyon Heights, Rainbow Canyon Road, Riverside County, CA,' dated August 2B, 1986, and your 'Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Rainbow Canyon Heights, Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, Riverside County, Ca,' dated September 20, lg88. Your report determined thaiS: ' No evidence of recency of faulting was observed along the Willard fault which passes through'the site. A fault shear zone, representing the mmin trace of the Willard fault, trends northwest and is exposed in the borrow site on the property. -- _ A ~gnttude 7.0 earthquake occurring on the Elsinore Fault Zone in close proximity to the site could produce a peak ground acceleration on the order of 0.71g at the site, with the duration of strong ground motion exceeding 30 seconds. 3.. The settlement potential under seismic loading conditions for the on-stte mtertals is low. 4. The potential for liquefaction at the site is considered low. 5. Cracking of ground at the site due to shaking from seismic events is not considered a significant hazard and would have a minor impact on the proposed development. 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 Highland Soils Engineering November 15, 1988 Page 2 The natural slopes on the site are considered relatively stable. The predominant Jointing pattern strikes northwest across the site, and dips to the northeast at moderate to high angles with no out-of-slope cofiLoonents noted. But cut and fill slopes were found to have factors of safety in excess of 1.5 static and 1.1 seismic and should be grossly stable in the planned configurations. 8. Erosion of the on-site sandy soils and bedrock should be a significant concern. 9. Difficult ripping and some blasting wtll be required for cuts in excess of 20 feet. Your report reconmnended that: Building lots astride the Willard Fault Zone must be over-excavated a minimum distance of 5 feet beyond the outer edge of exterior footings and to a depth of at least 3 feet when lots are cut, or fill of less than ~ feet. For proposed structures lying in the Willard Fault Zone, all continuous footings should be tied together with a ~4 reinforcement bar placed both top and bottom. 3, All cut slopes should have drainage benches at approximately 60 foot vertical intervals..Slopes over go feet in height should have a 12 foot wide bench at approximately mid-height. All exposed cut slopes should be observed by the project Engineering Geologist during grading. 4. All slopes should be planted with erosion rests~an~vegetatton or otherwise protected as soon as practical after grading. Building located adjacent to the top or toe of a slope should be set back one half the height of the slope with a minimum setback of 5 feet to a maximum of iS feet. '6. There should be a complete overcavatlon of loose/low strength natural sotls, extsttng ftll sotls, and trash. 7. Subdrainage beneath any finyon f111s ts recommended, subject to vertflcattoo durtng grading by an engineering geologist. Zt is our opinion that the report was prepared in I c~mpetent manner and satisfies the additional Infomarion requested under the California Environmental Oualtty Act review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Highland Soils Engineering November 15. 1988 Page 3 We recmmnend that the following note be placed on the final m~p prior to its recordation: 'County Geologic Report No. 508 was prepared for this property on August 28, 1986 and September 20, 1988 by Highland Geotechntcal Consultants, and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Oepartment. Specific items of interest are potentially active faults and seismic design of structures'. The recommendations made in your report concerning seismic/geologic hazards shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project. Ver~ truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNIN~ OEPARTM~NT Roger S. Streeter - Plan~ing Otre~tor Steven A~ Kupfermanl/ Engineering Geologist ! // CEG-1205 SAK:rd c.c. Ranpac Engineering -Oave James Building & Safety - Norm Losthom (2) Team 1 - Greg Neal CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR PALOMAR OBSERVATORY 105-Z4 This case is within 30 miles of the Palomar Observatory and is therefore within the zone requiring the use of low-pressure sodium vapor lamps fqr street lighting, as stipulated by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. We request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that may be employed on this property be made consistent with the spirit of the decision of the Board of Supervisors which is intended to mitigate the adverse effects such facilities have on ~he astronomical research at Palomar. Beneficial steps to that end include: 1. Use the minimum amount of light needed for the task. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent. direct upward illumination. Be Turn off lights at 11:00 p.m. (or earlier) unless, in commercial applications, the associated business is o~en past that time, in which case the lights should be turned off at closing. Use low-pressure sodium lamps for roadways, walkways, equipment yards, parking lots, security and other similar applications. These lights need not be turned of~ ~t 11:00 p.m. For further information, call (.818) 356-4035. Robert J. Brucato Assistant Director PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91125 TELEPHONE (BIB) 35e-4033 TELEX 67542~' CALTECH PSD #20/8/eg astern ./ un icipa[' at er District April 14, 1988 Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street,.9th Floor Riverside, California Board o/Direcron John M. Coudure~. Promodem Richard C, Kell¢.v, Vice Pre~mdent Wrn. G. Akirid~e ~ C. Gilbert RadBer D. Sinres Secretary. Loms~ C. Koe~m~ Ro~e~s M. Cox SUBJECT: TENTATIVE P.M. 21769 The District is responding to' your request for comments on the subject project(s) relative to the provision of water and sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: ,X Is not within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area ,x Must be annexed to this Oistrict's Improvement District No. to be eligible to' receive domestic water/sanitary sewer service. Will be required to construct the following facilities: i n order a.) Water Service b.) Sewer Service Onsite/offsite regionally sized gravity sewers and participate in regional sewer facilities. No sewers allowed now or future along lot lines. Sewer (existing) within 1320'. CITY OF TEMECULA .-.) VICINITY MAP CASE NO. P.C. DATE ITEM NO. 10 PP own c ?Y ( FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Planning Department July 2, 1991 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Richard Ayala ADOPT the addendum to EIR No. 281 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861; and ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTAT IVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: Presley of San Diego Crosby Mead Benton ~ Associates Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 Proposes a lq2 unit single family detached condominium development on lq.68 acres. South side of Highway 79 between Pala Road and Margarita Road. R-3 ( General Residential ) North: R-A-5 South: R East: SP West: R ( ResidentialAgricultural, 5 Acre Minimum) ( Planned Residential ) (Specific Plan 217, Red Hawk) ( Planned Residential ) A: 26861-AR. VTM~ 1 EXISTING LAND USE: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RA :ts Attachments: 2. 3. 5. 6. Vacant/Graded Land Multi-Family Total Units: Total Acres: Density: Common Recreation Open Space: lq.68 9.7 DU/AC 26,500sq.ft. (0.6 acres ) On May 20, 1991, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 along with Variance No. 7 (which will allow for less than the required 1,000 square foot minimum ground floor living area per Ordinance No. 3~8), for a PRD was presented before the City of Temecula Planning Commission and was approved by a 5-0 vote based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, with modifications to condition No. 37 and No. 68 regarding street improvements. In addition, the commission attached a condition requesting construction of the recreation area to be completed prior to first occupancy of Phase One and a condition relating to the C,C, S R's for the provisions of access and maintenance of the exterior of the buildings by the Homeowners Association. Planning Department staff recommends that the City Council: 1.. ADOPT the addendum to EIR No. 281 for Tentative Tract Map No. 26861; and ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Resolution Conditions of Approval Addendum to EI R No. 281 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 20, 1991 Development Fee checklist Planning Commission Minutes Dated May 20, 1991 )..' 26861 -~. I/'ll!~ 2 ATTACHMENT I RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26861 TO DEVELOP A 14,68 ACRE PARCEL INTO 142 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 BETWEEN PALA AND MARGARITA ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 926-016-025, WHEREAS, Presley of San Diego filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning. Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Vesting Tentative Tract Map on May 20. 1991. at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing. the Commission recommended approval of said Vesting Tentative Tract Map; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Vesting Tentative Tract Map on July 2. 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS. the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Vesting Tentative Tract Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. makes the following findings: That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its' decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan, ~:2686[-~.v~ 3 (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits. pursuant to this title, each of the following: (a) There is reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. a:26861-a~.vg~ 4 (c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. q60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development, e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. (2) The City Council in approving the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map, makes the following findings, to wit: e e e There is a reasonable probability that the proposed R-3 portion of the project will be consistent with the future general plan. Furthermore, densities and uses proposed are similar to existing densities and uses in the vicinity of the project site. The overall density for the entire 221 acres is 3.7 units per acre which conforms to the SWAP designation of 2-5. The proposed project does not conform with Ordinance No. 3t~8 development standards for Planned Residential Developments (PAD) due to the fact that the proposed development is proposing less than 1,000 square feet of ground floor living area which is required. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission recommend an official waiver for the required minimum ground floor area. Adequate public street access will be provided to every lot. The legal owner of record has offered to make all required dedications. The proposed project is physically suitable in design for the proposed density due to the fact that only 5% of the site net area is being designated as common recreation area for a project with a density of 9.7 DU/AC. Staff finds that site access will be adequate. Assessment District 159 will provide for street improvements on Pala Road and Highway 79, and two (2) access points to the site are shown on the map. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed design includes sufficient common open space and may therefore be consistent with the future General Plan. It is likely that the proposed vesting tentative map will not constitute a substantial detriment to the future General Plan, if the proposed subdivision is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, in that it may set a precedence for required common open space that may not be detrimental to the Parks and Recreational elements of the General Plan. ~ :26861-1R.71~ 6 The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. The proposed project makes adequate provision for future passive or natural solar heating opportunities in that all proposed parcels have adequate southern exposure. 10. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. These findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified El R No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. An addendum to EI R No. 281 is hereby recommended for adoption. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 for the development of a 14.68 acre parcel into 142 single family detached condominium units located along the south side of Highway 79 between Pala and Margarita Roads and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 926-016-025 subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment II, attached hereto. A:26861-AE.V~ 7 SECTION PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~dayof ,1991. RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCI LMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK A:26861-~R.VT}f~ 8 ATTACHMENT II CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 Project Description: Development of 1L~2 sinqle family condominium units on approximately lq.68 acres of land situated south of Hiqhway 79 between Pala Road and Marqarita Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 926-016-025 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance q60, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved vesting tentative tract map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Legal access as required by Ordinance q60 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a City maintained road. e All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary.. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer, Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasin9 shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. ~: 26861-~.V'i'IE~ 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. 16. Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5 shall be approved by the City Council and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. A maintenance district shall be established for maintenance along Highway 79. the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs relating to establishment of the district. A Homeowners Association shall be established for maintenance of Open Space/Common Area and the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs relating to establishment of the Homeowners Association. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated January 2q, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which is attached. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-3 ( General Residential) zone. be Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved' by the Director of Building and Safety. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: (1) Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: ae Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. l~: 2686z -~. v'~ l 0 be he Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth betming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees. Front yards shall be landscaped and street trees planted. Wall plans shall be submitted for the project perimeter and along Highway 79, "A" Street, and Via Rio Temecula. Wooden fencing shall not be allowed on the perimeter of the project. All lots with slopes leading down from the lot shall be provided with gates in the wall for maintenance access. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of- way. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March. 3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. 17. 18. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's- in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. be Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to q5 Ldn. Ce All building plans for.all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. de Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be designed and constructed with fire retardant ( Class A ) roofs as approved by the Fire Marshal. fo Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. g. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten {10) feet. i%: 26861-}~R. V~ 1 2 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. h o All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: ae All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. be All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. Ce Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with the Community Services District which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has satisfied Quimby Act requirements in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. q60. The agreement shall be approved by the City Council. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66q99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. Prior to occupancy of Phase One, the construction of the recreation area shall be completed. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66~62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 25. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 26. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal Access Easements: 27. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCF, R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CCSR~s shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, all buildings in common open areas, and all interior slopes. 28. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CCF, R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CCF, R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 29. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either ( 1 ) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. A:~6861-a~.V~ 1 4 30. 31. 32. Exterior building walls as well as the front yard landscaping shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association and shall be identified in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C,C ~, R's). Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the C,C F, R's. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00) which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar {$850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3} plus the Twenty-Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 33. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 34. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 35. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality; Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; a:2686z-~a.v~A 15 CalTrans; and Parks and Recreation Department. 36. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. 37. B, C, D, E, F, and G Streets shall be private streets and shall be improved with 33 feet of asphalt concrete pavement including rolled curb, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, 5 foot utility easements shall be dedicated running parallel on both sides of street. A 5 foot sidewalk shall be constructed on one side minimum of all private streets. 38. Dedication shall be made or shown to exist to provide for a 71 foot half street right-of-way for State Highway Route 79 (lq2' right-of-way). 39. Construct half street improvements in a 39 foot dedicated right-of-way plus one 12-foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, in accordance with County Standard No. 111(78'/56'). The improvements for street "A" may be phased per the approved phasing plan and as directed by the City Engineer. q0. In the event that State Highway 79 is not constructed by Assessment District 159 prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Phase One, the developer shall design and construct a deceleration lane west of Street "A" and an acceleration lane east of Street "A", per CalTrans standards. State Highway 79 improvements shall be bonded for prior to Final Map. "A" Street access shall be limited to right turning movements in and right turning movements out only. There shall be no left turns permitted and no provision for such movements shall be provided for on Highway 79 South. 42. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Highway 79 and so noted on the final map with the exception of approved public road connections as approved by the City Engineer. Dedicate a 38 foot minimum easement for public utilities and emergency vehicles access for all private streets and drives. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. q6. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCF, R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CCSR's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions: a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. be The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. de The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities. ee The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. i. The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or numbered lots. ii. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by homeowner's association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of building permits. III · Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CCSR's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. The developer, or the developer's successor, shall execute a current Public Facilities Agreement with the City of Temecula which provides for the payment of the sum of money per residential unit then established by Resolution of the City Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual lots. A:26861-AR.V'I'M~ 17 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 55. 56. 57. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards, Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. Landscaping, d. Sewer and domestic water systems. e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. q61 and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering Department. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. Street improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 26861-/111.~ 1 8 58. The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2it" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 59. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 60. The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 61. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 62. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 63. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering Department. 65. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 66. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. 67. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The Fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility Fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 a square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the A:26861-~.w~ 1 9 payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this agreement, Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this Project: provided that Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 68. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 69. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way: State Hiqhway 79 PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 70. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 71. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The Fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility Fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 a square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this Project; provided that Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. A:26861.AR.V,I,}{~ 20 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 72. Construct all street improvements as conditioned, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior private and public streets. 73. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. 7q. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than 1~ days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37. 39. and 9q of the State Standard Specifications. Department of Buildinq and Safety 75. Submit approved Tentative Tract Map to the Department of Building and Safety for addressing and street name review. 76. School fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School District prior to permit issuance. 77. Lighting on site pool area and recreation area shall comply with Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance #655. 78. Submit pool plans to Riverside County Health Department for review prior to structural plan review by the Department of Building and Safety. 79. Pool excavation area shall be fenced immediately the same day as excavation is complete. All plumbing trenches shall be fenced. 80. Obtain clearances from Land Use and from Building and Safety Departments. 81. Provide a geological report at time of submittal for plan review. R: 26861-A~,. V'17~ 2 1 GLEN .I. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIg. CALIFORNIA 923/0 (714) 657-3183 MARCH 7, 1991 TO: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTN: PLANNING/RICHARD AYALA RE: TRACT 26861 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2i") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Hinimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Appli~ant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans '~o the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the City of Temecula, a cash sum of $400.00 per unit as mitigations for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Parking will be allowed only on one side of private streets, ~ INDIO omcE 79.7):5 C,o~,,rr, Clu}, [~;,e .e~hr F. h,dk,. C~, 92201 .,". '-" -- · · ~ x'. ""*~ ;TS-lOT2 PLANNING DIVISION Q TEMECUL~. O!:'F1CE 41(~2 C,.~,,r~ C~,,,~r ~i,'~, .~mke 22S. Trmecula CA ":.: e"...~ ~ ' · t ~'~:¢714) 694e~'°~'. TRACT 26861 PAGE 2 Blue-dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrants. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner ,, By -/? ~ Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist LC/tm COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE /DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 406,% COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE, CA. 9:~503 (Mad.rig Address - P.O. 8o= 7600 925,3- uarv 24. 1991 CITY C'P TEHECULA 431,90 BL::.:.INE$:?-, FARK DF:IVE. ¢{.1ITE 200 TEMECULA. CA 923'90 AA-rN: Richard Ayala RE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23299: BEING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 926-160-011. ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA. (1 lots) Dear Gentlemen: The Deoartment of Public Health has reviewed Tract Mac, No. 23299 and recommends: A water system shall be ~nstalled accordtno to plans and soeclflcatlons as aDoroved bY the water company and the Health Deoartment. Permanent orlnts of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate. w~th a minimum scale not less than one inch e~uals 200 feet. alon~ with the original drawln~ to the County $urYe¥or. The ~rlnts · shall show the internal DIDe diameter. location of valves and fire hydrants: pi~e and joint sDeclflcat. 1ons. and the size of the main at the .~unctxon of the new system to the existlno system. The plans shall comply in all resmeets with Dip. 5, Part 1. Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code. Title 22. Chapter 16. and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. when a~pl~cable. The plans shall be si~n.ed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certxfl'cation: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Moo 23299 is in accordance with the water s~st~m expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services. storaoe. and dtstribution system will be adeouate to provide water service to such Tract Map". !.ll~ COVNe.. M S ~.ztv or' Temecul.~ Attn: Ri ch.~r~ 2an,.,,a:-v ~4. 199! This ,_-ertl~lcatl~i-~ d?~ 159t r_~.~$t lt~It:. & clLiBral-~tee that It will :,.ft.,Ply water te ~uch tract mar., at any specific c,.Imr~tl~ ira,. flow~ or r, re~$ures fc, r firm protection or any cther c, urDc, c-~" Thl_~ certlflcatlen ~ha!l be =_i..~ned bv ..~. re~c. ens~ble off local of the %;ater c.:,mc,~r,v. Th.e pl~r,s m:4%t be s,.~Smitted to The County $UrVeVOr. ~ Office to revIe%; at le~t two. wge~ .~[.%.~ .k~ kb.e _[~u.~k.!.._[o[...kbe.. E.e.g.o_~.at_%gr, .o.f Th~s subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water Dlstrlct acreelnc to serve domestic water to each and everv lot in the subdivision on demand provldxnc satisfactory financial arranoement~ are completed with the subdiv~der. It will be necessary for f~nanczal arrancements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This subdivision is within the Eastern Municioal Water Dlstr~ct and sha!! be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be Installed accordln~ to plans and soecxflcations as am~roved by the District, the C~untv Surveyor and the Mealth Department. ~ermanent prints of the ~lan$ of the sewer system shall be submitted in trimlycate, alonm with the original drawlno. to the County Surveyor. /'he mrlnt$ shall show the internal ~i~e diameter. location of manholes, complete ~rofile$. pipe and 3olnt soecificatlons and the s~ze of the sewers at the 3unction of the new system to the exlstlna system. A sinale plat lndicatlno location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be sicned by a reqlstered enqlneer and the sewer district with the followin~ certification: "I certlfv that the de$i~n of the sewer svstem in Tract Mam 23a99 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adeouate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract maD." The plans must be su. bml.t.$ed...~.o .the gount. w $urvevor'.s Offlee to revle~.~L. l~.as~.....~o_.~ee~.~.P[~Q..r..%.D.%hg.....£Rq.~e~t for ~he recordation of the flna_l map,. It wxil be necessary for f~nanc~al arranoement$ to be com~,letel¥ f~nallzed Dr~or to recordation of the f~na! mao. ~lrice~el¥, ironmental Health Specialist IV SM:dr ATTACHMENT III ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 281 The Riverside County Board of Supervisors certified Environmental Impact Report (Ell{) No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Change of Zone No. 5150 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. The EIR included mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts to levels of insignificance. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 which supersedes Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23299 has 87 fewer residential units than Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23299 and therefore, will generate less traffic and result in reduced impacts to the environment and to public services and utilities. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will involve minimal grading and therefore, is unlikely that any additional amount of earth movement will result in any increased significant impacts. The Conditions of Approval are adequate to mitigate any potential impacts regarding drainage and non- renewable fossil resources to levels of insignificance. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act, this addendum has been prepared to demonstrate that the changes resulting from the proposed Change of Zone and New Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Revised Tentative Tract Map will not result in new or substantially increased significant impacts, that there have been no changes in the circumstances surrounding the project that would require important revisions to the EIR due to new significant impacts, and that no new information has arisen which would indicate that the project will have significant effects not previously discussed or underestimated, or that alternatives or mitigation measures not previously considered would substantially reduce any significant impacts. By reducing the number of residential units, the new project will reduce the level of impacts on the environment and on public facilities and services. A: 26861 -AR. VTM\ 2 2 MEMOEANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Planning Director May 20, 1991 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 The above subject case was presented before the Planning Commission on April 1, 1991, concurrently with Change of Zone No. 5 and Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267, which both were approved. However, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 was continued off-calendar by the Commission in order for Planning Staff to address the required 1,000 square foot minimum ground floor living area per Ordinance No. 3~0, Section 18.5(5) within a PAD. A variance application was considered the appropriate mechanism for processing. Therefore, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 and Variance No. 7 will be presented concurrently per Planning Commission request· STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council: 1. ADOPTION of the Addendum to EIR No. 281 for Tentative Tract Map No. 26861; and 2. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 91- recommending approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861. RA/GT:ks Attachments: Resolution Conditions of Approval Staff Report (April 1. 1991) Minutes (April 1, 1991) A: 26861 -AR. VTH\ 2 3 Case No.: Recommendation: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 1, 1991 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 Prepared By: Richard Ayala e ADOPT the addendum to EIR No. 281 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861; and ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT ION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: Presley of San Diego Crosby Mead Benton F, Associates Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 Proposes a 142 unit single family detached condominium development on approximately 14.68 acres. South side of Highway 79 between Pala Road and Margarita Road. R-R (Rural Residential) North: R-A-5 ( ResidentialAgricultural 5 Acre Minimum) South: A-1-10 (Light Agricultural, 10 Acre Minimum) East: SP (Specific Plan 217, Red Hawk) West: R-R ( Rural Residential) R-3 (General Residential) 14.68 acres R-~ ( Planned Residential ) 189 acres R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone, Residential Developments) 57.8 acres Vacant/Graded Land SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: Low Density Single Family Existing Sod Farm A: 26861 -AR.VTt4\ 2 ~ PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: East: West: Vacant/Single Family Tract Under Construction Vacant Multi-Family Total Units: Total Acres: Density: Common Recreation Open Space: 145 14.68 9.7 DU/AC 26,500sq. ft. (0.6 acres ) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 was presented before the Planning Commission on March 18, 1991 and was continued in order for Staff to come with an agreement with the applicant regarding the common recreation open space area; and also for the city attorney to interpret the minimum 1.000 sq.ft, ground floor living area requirement in Ordinance No. 348. Since then, both Planning Staff and the applicant have been in direct contact and have come to an acceptable agreement relating to the recreation area. The applicant has agreed to incorporate units 124, 144, and 145 into the recreation area design thus increasing the recreation area to 26,500 sq.ft., (190 square sq.ft. per unit) which Staff feels is acceptable for this type of development. The subject property was originally a portion of the Old Vail Ranch. It is located along the south side of Highway 79 between Pala and Margarita Roads, The original application, Change of Zone No, 5150 was a request to change the zoning on 221.2 acres of land from R-R (Rural Residential), and R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone), This zone change was approved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors on October 20, 1988, However, due to an oversight by the County. the zone change was never given a second reading and. therefore. was never officially adopted. The applicant submitted a new application. Change of Zone No. 5, to the City of Temecula Planning Department on September 24, 1990, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 was submitted to the City of Temecula on December 21, 1990. On January 17, 1991, this project was reviewed by the Preliminary Development Review Committee A: 26861-AR. VTN\ 25 PROJECT DESCR IPT ION: ANALYSIS: (Pre-DRC) in order to informally evaluate the project and address any concerns, as well as suggesting possible modifications. The comments by the Pre-DRC included the following: 2. 3. Open Space (Common) Setback (Side Yard) Traffic Impacts Access/Circulation Subsequent to the Pre-DRC meeting, Staff met with the applicant to discuss possible design modifications in order to address the Pre-DRC's concerns. On March 7, 1991, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 was reviewed at a Formal Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting; and, it was determined that Vesting Tentative Tract No. 26861 did not meet code requirements or Staff's concerns regarding useable common open space. This tract proposes 142 single family detached condominium units on approximately 14.68 acres of proposed R-3 zoned land. The development is also proposing approximately 26,500 square feet (0.6 acres) of common recreational area composed of a swimming pool, wading pool, spa, cabana and a general use open space area with picnic benches and a tot lot. Access to the development is being provided from "A" Street and the proposed road adjacent to the creek. {See VTM 26861 Site Plan. ) The applicant is proposing to develop 1L[2 single family detached condominium units on approximately 1L~.68 acres of proposed R-3 zoned land along with a 26,500 square foot (0.6 acres) recreational area. The project is situated along Highway 79 and is east of Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267. Access to the project is being provided by "A" Street and Via Rio Temecula along the Temecula Creek as shown on the site plan. The design as submitted and reviewed by Planning Staff represents a PRD (Planned Residential Development) design. However, the-project as submitted does not conform with the PRD Standards as required in an R-3 zone in that the ground floor living area of the proposed product types do not meet the minimum 1,000 square foot standard. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission recommend an official A: 26861-AR.VTI~\ 26 waiver for the required minimum ground floor area. (See attachment IV for waiver request.) In addition, although the project contains the required 40% open space, the majority of the open space is located within the private rear yards of the units and only contains approximately 300 to 600 square feet of useable area. The proposed common open space within the project is approximately 5% of the site and is approximately 190 square feet per unit. Since there are currently no specific design criteria regarding open space requirement for R-3 projects or PRD's, the Planning Staff cannot address what portion of the required q0% open space should be useable common open space, but it is Staff's determination that the common open space provided is not sufficient. The applicant has made a strong effort to meet Planning Staff~s recommendation for common recreation open space and is proposing approximately 26,500 sq.ft. of recreation area. By deleting three additional units ( 12~, lqq, 1~5). The project as submitted does not conform to City adopted Ordinance No. 3~8 in regard to a smaller lot single family project, thus, not conforming to R-2 Single Family Restricted nor R-L~ zones due to the density, lack of adequate street frontages, and rear yards. In Staff~s opinion, the proposed project does not provide acceptable useable recreation open space to compensate for the proposed density with the proposed design concept of single family detached units. The project as proposed consists of a 20' minimum front setback and an 8' minimum distance between dwelling units. In addition, private rear yard open spaces are being proposed with a minimum 10~ setback and range between 300 to 600 square feet of useable area, thus, not conforming to R-2 and R-~ development standards. However, the applicant is compensating the small private rear yard open spaces with additional recreation area in order to provide additional common open space area for its future residents. Planning Staff recommends that multiple family projects and PRD~s provide a minimum of 200 square feet per unit or 10% of the net area as common open space within the project. This recommendation would require the project to provide a 30,000 square A:26861-AR.VTM\ 27 GENERAL PLAN/SWAP CONSISTENCY AND COMPATI BI LITY: ENV I RONMENTA L DETERMINATION: feet to one acre site designated as common open space recreational area. The applicant is proposing approximately 26,500 sq.ft., thus, increasing the recreation area by 10,978 sq.ft. from the original proposal. The proposed development's access which has been determined to be acceptable to the Engineering Department. The project is proposed to be completely gated with 33' private streets and 5' sidewalks on only one side of the street. The project also provides a 26,500 sq.ft. (0.6 acres) recreational area which is centrally located. In conclusion, although Planning Staff has determined that the project does not conform with ordinance 348, the applicant has made a strong effort to compensate the Ordinance 348 deficiencies by providing an acceptable common recreation open space area. In addition, Planning Staff believes that the proposed development will be consistent with the City's future General Plan. Therefore, Planning Staff recommends approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 alone is inconsistent with the SWAP. However, combined with Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267, they are consistent with the SWAP, in that they propose a density of 3.7 DU/AC, well within the designated density of 2-5 DU/AC required by the SWAP. Planning Staff believes that there is a probability that the project as developed and zoned will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed density acts as an adequate buffer to adjacent residential and commercial areas. Environmental Impact Report No. 281 was completed on the subject property for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23299, the originally approved County tract map. The report indicated a number of mitigation measures that must be implemented in order to reduce the impact of the project below a level of significance. These mitigation measures included a new ~-Iane bridge on Pala Road over Temecula Creek, the channelization of Temecula A:26861-AR.VTM\ 28 FINDINGS: Creek, and several other significant measures that have not currently been implemented, Therefore, Planning Staff recommends that an addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 281 be adopted, A copy of which is attached. There is a reasonable probability that the proposed R-3 portion of the project will be consistent with the future general plan, Furthermore, densities and uses proposed are similar to existing densities and uses in the vicinity of the project site, The overall density for the entire 221 acres is 3.7 units per acre which conforms to the SWAP designation of 2-5, 0 The proposed project does not conform with Ordinance No. 348 development standards for Planned Residential Developments (PRD) due to the fact that the proposed development is proposing less than 1.000 square feet of ground floor living area which is required, Therefore. the applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission recommend an official waiver for the required minimum ground floor area, Adequate public street access will be provided to every lot, The legal owner of record has offered to make all required dedications, The proposed project is physically suitable in design for the proposed density due to the fact that only 5% of the site net area is being designated as common recreation area for a project with a density of 9.7 DU/AC, Staff finds that site access will be adequate. Assessment District 159 will provide for street improvements on Pala Road and Highway 79. and two (2) access points to the site are shown on the map. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed design includes sufficient common open space and may therefore be consistent with the future General Plan, It is likely that the proposed vesting tentative map will not constitute a substantial A: 26861-AR.VTM\ 2 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RA:ks e 10. detriment to the future General Plan, if the proposed subdivision is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. in that it may set a precedence for required common open space that may not be detrimental to the Parks and Recreational elements of the General Plan. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment, The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No, 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos, 23267 and 23299, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts, The proposed project makes adequate provision for future passive or natural solar heating opportunities in that all proposed parcels have adequate southern exposure, The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety. and welfare. 11. These findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. the Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT the addendum to EIR No. 281 for Tentative Tract Map No. 26861; and ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861. A:26861-AR.VTH\ 30 Attachments: Resolution (VTM No. 26861 ) Conditions of Approval (VTM No. 26861) Addendum to EIR No. 281 Waiver Request Exhibits A. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 (Site Plan) B. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 {Elevations and Floor Plans) A:26861-AR.VTH\ 31 ATTACHMENT I RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26861 TO DEVELOP A 1[~.68 ACRE PARCEL INTO 1[t2 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 BETWEEN PALA AND MARGARITA ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 926-016-025. WHEREAS, Presley of San Diego filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Vesting Tentative Tract Map on May 20, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved said Vesting Tentative Tract Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. makes the following findings: That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be A: 26861-AR. V'I'M~ 3 2 studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP"'} was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map and is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (a) There is reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, {b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. q60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent l~:2e8ez-~.v,~ 3 3 with applicable 9eneral and specific plans. b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development, e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. (2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Tract Map, makes the following findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that the proposed R-3 portion of the project will be consistent with the future general plan. Furthermore, densities and uses proposed are similar to existing densities and uses in the vicinity of the project site. The overall density for the entire 221 acres is 3.7 units per acre which conforms to the SWAP designation of 2-5. A:26861-AR.VTH\ 3q b! c) d) e) f) g! h) The proposed project does not conform with Ordinance No. 3~8 development standards for Planned Residential Developments {PRD) due to the fact that the proposed development is proposing less than 1,000 square feet of ground floor living area which is required. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission recommend an official waiver for the required minimum ground floor area. Adequate public street access will be provided to every lot. The legal owner of record has offered to make all required dedications. The proposed project is physically suitable in design for the proposed density due to the fact that only 5% of the site net area is being designated as common recreation area for a project with a density of 9.7 DU/AC. Staff finds that site access will be adequate. Assessment District 159 will provide for street improvements on Pala Road and Highway 79, and two (2) access points to the site are shown on the map. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed design includes sufficient common open space and may therefore be consistent with the future General Plan. It is likely that the proposed vesting tentative map will not constitute a substantial detriment to the future General Plan, if the proposed subdivision is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, in that it may set a precedence for required common open space that may not be detrimental to the Parks and Recreational elements of the General Plan. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental A: 26861 -AR. VT/,!\ 35 impacts. The proposed project makes adequate provision for future passive or natural solar heating opportunities in that all proposed parcels have adequate southern exposure. j) The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. k) These findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. An addendum to EI R No. 281 is hereby recommended for adoption. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approvesVesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 for the development of a 14.68 acre parcel into 145 single family detached condominium units located along the south side of Highway 79 between Pala and Margarita Roads and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 926-016-025 subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment II, attached hereto. SECTION 4. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHA I RMAN A:26861-AR.VTH\ 36 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof. held on the 20th day of May, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: 26861 -AR. VTM\ 37 CITY OF TEMECULA 0 / / CASE NO. ;'~;"~ ~' VICINITY MAP ~ P.C. DAT'~ ~r,~/ I$"~!1 J CITY OF TEMECULA ~ ZONE MAP -'~ P.C. DATE CITY OF TEMECULA ! I THE MEADOWS $P 2~9.-" VA I HAWI~ $P CASE# Exl. ll!~rt D- ! '_C I I ATTACHMENT CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Vestinq Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Traffic Signal Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Library ) Fire Protection Flood Control {ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 20 Condition No. 21 Condition No. 73 Condition No. 51 Condition No. 18(a) Letter Dated March 7, 1991 Condition No. 67 ~:2686~-~m.v~m~ 38 PLAIqNIN~ COMMTS~ION MINUTES 20, 4. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26863. AND VARIANCE NO. 7 4.3. Proposal to develop 145 detached condominium units on approximately 14 acres and variance to allow for the development of units below the required 1000 square foot minimum ground floor living area per Ord. 348. RICHARD AYALA provided the staff report. CHAIRM~NCHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:00 P.M. RAY CASEY, 15090 Avenue of Science, $200, San Diego, representing Presley of San Diego, answered questions by the Commission reqarding the changes in the development. COMMISSIONER FORD suggested that the project be conditioned to complete the recreation area prior to occupancy of Phase One. RAY CASEY stated that he saw'no problem in fulfilling that Condition. ALEXANDER URQUHART, Crosby Mead Benton & Associates, 5650 E1 Camino Real, #200, Carlsbad, project engineering manager, stated the applicants concurrence with the changes to Condition 37 and answered questions by the Commission about the development. CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF expressed a concern for the exterior maintenance of the project. The applicant was proposing that the individual homeowners maintain the exterior walls and wood fencing and the Homeowners Association maintain the front yard landscaping. After discussion the applicant agreed to have the exterior walls as well as the front yard landscaping maintained by the Homeowners Association. The applicant was also proposing that the CSD maintain the exterior walls of the project. G~RY THORNHILL stated that the exterior project walls would be the Homeowners Association's responsibility as well; however, CSD would maintain the exterior landscaping. COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing at 7:25 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Adopt the Addendum to EIR No. 281 for Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) recommending approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861, and Variance No. 7, subject to the Conditions of Approval with Condition 37 and Condition 68 modified and adding a PCMINS/20/91 -4- MAY 24, 1991 PT.]LII~N'XNG CO)D(XSSXON KI'N~T~S 20, 1ggx condition requesting construction of the recreation area to be completed prior to first occupancy of Phase One and the addition of a condition relating to the CC&R's for the provisions of access and maintenance by the Homeowners Association, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOXGLAND. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None CHAIRMAN CHXNI&EPP declared a five minute recess at 7:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:30 P.M. ITEM NO. 11 /.--... APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager City Clerk July 2, 1991 Item No. 11 - Zone Change No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852, Plot Plan 224 DISCUSSION: This matter is continued from the meeting of June 25, 1991. prepared for that meeting is attached. JSG The staff report APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department June 25, 1991 Change of Zone 11, Parcel Map No. 26852, Plot Plan 22~ PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Steve J iannino Staff recommends that the City council Adopt a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852, and Plot Plan No. 22q; Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Change of Zone No. 11 based on the findings contained in the Staff Report; Conduct 1st reading of Ordinance No. 91- read by title only adopting the proposed Change of Zone contained in Change of Zone No. 11; Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Parcel Map No. 26852 based on the findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Plot Plan 22~ based on the findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. ~:224PP.CC 1 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Bedford Development Co. REPRESENTATIVE: J.F. Davidson Associates and Herron & Rumansoff PROPOSAL: Change of Zone from R-R (Rural Residential) to C- P-S- (Scenic Highway Commercial) on 2/4 acres of a 97.3 acre site, construction of a 1/49,500 square foot commercial center on 19.7 acres and subdivide 19.3 acres into 13 parcels with two remainder parcels. LOCAT ION: Northwest corner of Margarita and Winchester Roads. EXISTING ZONING: R-R (Rural Residential) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: R- R South: R-R East: R- R West: R-R ( Rural Residential) ( Rural Residential) ( Rural Residential) ( Rural Residential) PROPOSED ZONING: C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Vacant/Industrial Commercial Vacant Vacant Vacant SWAP DESIGNATION: C ( Commercial ) PROJECT STATISTICS: Project Area: No. of Lots: Proposed Zone Change: No. of Buildings: Total Building Square Footage: Total Parking Provided: Total Parking Required: Buildings are Proposed on Lots: 97.32 acres 13 + 2 remainders C-P-S on Lots I - 13 3 1/49,696 sq.ft. 859 spaces 7/49 spaces /4, 7, and 13 BACKGROUND: On July 17, 1991 the City of Temecula Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on Change of Zone No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852. and Plot Plan No. 22/4. The Planning Commission recommended approval of Change of Zone No. 11 and Parcel Map No. 26852 by a /4-0 vote with Commissioner Fahey absent. The Commission also recommended approval of Plot Plan No. 22/4 by a 3-1 vote with Commissioner Blair voting negative and Commissioner Fahey absent. The Commissioners expressed concerns with the proposed landscaping and R: 224PP. CC 2 architecture of the project· The Commission added two Conditions of Approval to Plot Plan No. 22~ to address their concerns; Condition No. 11.b and Condition No. 17.a. Condition No. 11.b requires that the landscaping plan be redesigned and submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The revised plans shall be reviewed, approved, and installed prior to occupancy of the first building. Condition No. 17.a requires the developer to add architectural elements to the building to down scale the appearance of the large building bulk. These are to be cosmetic changes and will not involve a change in the building structure as submitted. The Commissioners also expressed concerns with traffic impact of the project especially the intersection of Winchester and Margarita Roads. The Commission felt that a signal should be installed prior to the opening of Costco whether or not Caltrans feel that the warrants for a signal are met. The Commissioners understood that the signal was controlled by Caltrans and felt frustrated with not being able to have more control over the traffic at the intersection. The Commissioners decided to address their concerns by adding a Condition of Approval to the Parcel Map and the Plot Plan requiring the City Engineer to review the traffic situation and develop alternative mitigation methods such as the use of Traffic Directors or ~-way stops until a signal is installed and operating at the intersection. These mitigations will be required for the opening of the proposed Costco which the Commissioners expect to draw additional traffic to the intersection. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City council Adopt a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852, and Plot Plan No. 22q; Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Change of Zone No. 11 based on the findings contained in the Staff Report; Conduct 1st reading of Ordinance No. 91- read by title only adopting the proposed Change of Zone contained in Change of Zone No. 11; Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Parcel Map No. 26852 based on the findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and Adopt Resolution No. 91- approving Plot Plan 22q based on the findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. ATTACHMENTS: 3. 5. 6. 7. Resolution approving Change of Zone No. 11 Ordinance Change of Zone No. 11 Resolution approving Parcel Map No. 26852 Conditions of Approval Parcel Map No. 26852 Resolution approving Plot Plan No. 22~ Condition of Approval Plot Plan No. 22~ Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 17, 1991 A:224PP.CC 3 ATTACHMENT I RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON 24 ACRES OF LAND FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE NO, 108, WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Change of Zone No. 11 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Change of Zone application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Change of Zone on June 17 1, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Change of Zone; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Change of Zone on June 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Change of Zone; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Change of Zone; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. the following findings: Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan, {2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and R: 224PP. CC 4 taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The City Council in approving the proposed Change of Zone, makes the following findings, to wit: The proposed Change of Zone will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. e There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is compatible with the surrounding proposed development, zoning, and SWAP. e There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is compatible with surrounding development and improvements. A:224PP.CC 5 The site is physically suited for the proposed Change of Zone in that required infrastructure exists or is being provided in the area including commercial roadways, drainage facilities, and main sewer and water lines. e The proposed Change of Zone is consistent with the SWAP designation of C (Commercial). The zone change will be beneficial by providing an area for needed services and employment. D. The Change of Zone is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted, SECTION 3. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Change of Zone No. 11 to change the zoning on 2q acres of land from R-R to C-P-S along the north side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Rancho California Water District Well Site No. 108. Resolution. SECTION q._:, The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1991. RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of June. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: ~: 224PP. CC 6 AYES: COUNCI LMEMBERS NOES: COUNCI LMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK A:224PP.CC 7 ATTACHMENT 2 ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION No. 11 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (R'URAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S [SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ALONG THE NORTH SI DE OF Wl NCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE NO. 108. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 11 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] a:224PP.¢¢ 8 CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MAP NO: 5 CHANCE OF ZONE NO: ORDINANCE NO: 91- 11 ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: ATTACHMENT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26852 TO SUBDIVIDE A 97.3 ACRE PARCEL INTO 13 PARCELS AND 2 REMAINING PARCELS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF Wl NCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS. said Tentative Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Parcel Map on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Tentative Parcel Map; WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Tentative Parcel Map on June 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said Tentative Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:-- A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: A:224PP.CC lO a~ There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a'reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b! There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or- action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. {1) Pursuant to Section 18.30{c), no plot plan may be a:224PP.CC 11 approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General 'Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances, b) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property, (2) The City Council, in approving the proposed Tentative Tract Map, makes the following findings, to wit: The proposed Parcel Map will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the surrounding proposed development, zoning and SWAP. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,due to the fact that the project is consistent with surrounding proposed development. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law due to the fact that the project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. q60, Schedule E. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density due to the fact that the project has access to public roads and sufficient building area. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as determined in the initial study. e The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities due to the fact that the lots are large enough to provide sufficient southern exposure with passive or active solar possibilities. e All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic, access is provided from Winchester and Margarita Roads. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as conditioned. The project will not interfere with any easements. 10. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. 11. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. a:224PP.CC '13 SECTION 3_.:. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Tentative Tract Map No. 26852 for the subdivision of a 97.3 acre parcel into 13 parcels and 2 remainders located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Resolution. SECTION 4_:. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1991. RONALD J PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of June, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCI LMEMBERS NOES: COUNCI LMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK ~: 224PP. CC 14 ATTACHMENT ~ CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No: 26852 Project Description: 1~ Lot Commercial Subdivision with 2 Remainders, on 97 acres located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Marqarita Roads. Assessor's Parcel No.: 911-180-026 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. e This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is · The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the City Engineer and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 5o Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Legal access as required by Ordinance q60 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a City maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Provide reciprocal access, parking, drainage and maintenance agreements between all the parcels through an REA or CCSR's prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney. Document to be recorded with the final map. 0 The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated April 2q, 1991, a copy of which is attached. ~:224PP.CC 15 e The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 10. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 11. All 'proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. 12. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: ae Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial ) zone. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety Department. 14. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty {30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory." be "A Liquefaction Hazard Report (County Geologic Report No. 793) has been done for this site and is on file in the Planning Department." Ce Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontologic resources. A qualified vertebrate paleontologist must be retained to develop a mitigation program prior to issuance of grading permits. 15. Prior to the issuance of BUILDI NG PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: (1) Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. be Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. Ce All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. 16. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. 17. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. 18. be Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: ~: 224PP. CC 17 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 2~. ae All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. be All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Within forty-eight (~8) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars {$1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars { $1,250.00 ) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~{ d)(2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and lq Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight {q8) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~{c). Dedicate right-of-way along Winchester Road along remainder parcel. The applicant shall comply with recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated April 23, 1991. a: 224P~a. CC 1_ 8 25. A 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 26. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 27. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 28. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; CalTrans; and Parks and Recreation Department. 29. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. 30. Margarita Road from Highway 79 to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 {86'/110'). 31. In the event that Winchester Road (Highway 79) is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18 foot lane per CalTrans Standard (110'/13q'). The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March ltt, prior a:224~m.cc 1 9 .... to occupancy. 32. 33. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66q62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road {Highway 79) and Margarita Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CalTrans. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. A Notice of Intention to form and/or join the Landscape and Lighting District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. Notice of Intention to join the median island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be ' executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping {street and parks). d. Sewer and domestic water systems. a:22~I~.cc 20 e. All trails, as required by the City~s Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. q61 and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering Department. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. q8. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 50. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard ~00 and 401 (curb sidewalk). 51. The subdivider shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~t~ x 36~' mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 52. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department 53. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and A:~4~P.cc 21 submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 55. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 56. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 57. As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. 58. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering Department. 59. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. 60. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone "A", which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. 61. The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. 62. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 63. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's a:22amP.cc 22 Office. 65. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 66. Prior to any work being performed, an application for a Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. 67. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 68. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Winchester Road (Hiqhway 79) 69. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 70. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 71. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 72. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 73. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public a:224~P.CC 23 ,~o .NNrT~ L E~ FAx~O ~7t4,710 t~e$ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1~lV[I~S;~[ C&LI~O~INIA 12S02 April 15, 1991 J.F. Davidson Assoc~&tes, Inc. Post Office Box 340 Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: David B. Scare Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Map 26852 Plot Plan 224 City of Temecula You have sent us material regard(rig these cases for our 'review as a Land Use case and as a land subdivision". We do not make floodproofing recommendations or write flood hazard reports for projects in incorporated cities. But it t8 appropriate that we comment on Santa Ger:rudts Creek Channel since we are involved with the flood control aspects of Assessment District 1~1. ~e have recently approved the plans for Santa Ger%rudt$ Creek Channel, The channel will capture and safely convey the 100 year storm runoff in that stream when it has been constructed tn its entirety according to plans, and when surrounding land developments have been brought up to grade as proposed. If the project iS constructed in stages, as we understand te now being considered, additional stud~ would be necessary ~o determine its performance. It should also be noted that Assessment Dtetrtct 161 hag not yet made application for a Conditional Letter of Nap Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Properties w~thin the FEMA mapped floodplain will remain lubeact to flood insurance requirements unttl FEHA has issued a letter of Hap find the proposed improvements acceptable. The Dtetrtct will not accept the Santa Gertrudte Channel for operation and ~aln%enance until t~ has been completed, all necessary grading adjacent to %he channel has been completed, approval by FEMA. C: City of Temecule Engineering Department Bedford Properties Attn: Greg Erickson RANPAC Attn: Chuck Collins and :he improvement8 have been H. KASHUBA ' ~enior Ctvil Engtneer JHK:pln qiVE iD ' ¢OUrlCS April 23, 1991 Ranpac Soils, Inc. 41710 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Christopher Krall Won $. Yoo Subject: Liquefaction Hazard Work Order No. 690-161 Plot Plan 224 A.P.N.: 910-110-029 County Geologic Report No. 793 City of Temecula Gent lemen: We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Margarita Meadows Commercial Center, Winchester and Margarita Road, Temecula, CA," dated November 1, 1990. Your report determined that: 1. The potential for liquefaction of the subsurface soils at this site during a seismic event is considered to be moderate. The most significant effect of liquefaction at the site would be settlement of the ground surface. Indicated settlement on the order of one inch would be possible on localized areas of the site. Differentlet settlement at the site from zero to one inch is likely to occur across distances of 300 feet or more. 3; Other effects of liquefaction including loss of bearing capacity, sand boils and lateral spreading are considered unlikely. Your report recommended that: of recompaction shall foundation,per~meter. All foundations shall be constructed entirely in compacted fill. The depth of fill shall extend a minimum of two footing widths beneath the base of the footing witha minimum of 2 feet and maximum of 8 ~eet. The area extend f£ve feet' outside the 'an~,- LEUON STREE~T, FgTH FLOOR I~OR!:'~ 92'' ;79733' COUNTRY'CLUB' DRIVE', Sum BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92 (£"~ ."~2-8 ~ ~i~u~ of ~wo fee~ o~ recollected n~ve ~ai~s ond/o~ ~hal~ b~ a min4~ pressure for thes~ footin~s Concret~ s~abs -o~- qrad~ shall ~av~ a ~in~um ~h;ckness compac~e~ with ~ain-,~e devices Ans+.allc~ In ~,:cor~nco ~ep~rt ~s h~reby ~lven. conc%ru~ ] r,n o~ ~e p~ o~.ct. : Ve~ truly ~ou~c . JZ! F.AT~ ~F CALIFOPd4~A -~U5IN[$$~%AN,~PO~TATIO]I AND ~OU$I~ P~TMENT OF T~NSPORTATION DISTRICT ~,P.O. BOX SAN B~A~INO, ~ ~2402 ~DD (714) 383-4609 PITI W1L$O~:, ~overnc. r Apr11 16, 1991 08-R1v-79-R2.86/R3.18 Planning Department Attention: Steve Jiannino City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 Your Reference: Plot Plan 224, Parcel HaD 26852, Change of Zone 11 Dear Mr. Jiannino: An Encroachment Permit will be required for the proposed Grading, Signage and Landscaping within the State R/W. In addition, Caltrans' Development Review branch has the following concerns: · ~he connection to State Highway 79 (.SH 79) called out as a 50' Driveway, approximately 1200 feet southwest of Margarita Road, must be a street connection, not a driveway, as shown on Permit application 90-1868 and as agreed to in several previous meetings between Caltrans personnel and JF Davidson engineers. Access to the proposed development must be taken off this local street, not off of the State highway· Perhaps the developer might consider a cul-de-sac configuration to accomplish this. The Traffic Study done for Assessment District 161 (widening'of Winchester Road) by Kunzman and Associates did not study this intersection to determine the need for signalization. If signals are to be constructed, warrants must be met. The access shown approximately 500 feet southwest of margarita Road is intended to serve the Rancho California Water District property only· It may not be used as an additional access to the proposed development. Also, it must conform to the configuration shown on Permit application 90-1868 (see attached, highlighted mockup of that access point). The Water District access shall be a Caltrans standard NS-A, Case A, type of driveway. Curb returns are not permitted. Details and elevations of the proposed Pylon Signage at the Site Entry from SH 79 must be submitted a part of the Permit application package. In addition to the above-noted concerns, this office must see the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) Conditions of Approval Grading and drainage Plans (not conceptuals) A copy of any documents providing additional State R/W A copy of the Traffic Study A check print of the Parcel Map (not Tentative Map). The map need not be signed and recorded, but must be stamped with the City's "Stamp of Approval". A check print of any plans for improvements within the State R/W (including Landscaping Plans) If you should have any questions, please call Mr. Ahmad Salah or Mr. Mike Sim at (714) 383-4384. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Tim Chowdhury District Development Review Engineer STATE OF CALIFOI~NIA--.~J$1NE$S, TRANSPO~TATIO~J AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 221 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 TDO (714) 383-4609 March 14, 1991 PETE WILSON, C, ovemor Development Review 08-Riv-79-R3.180 Your Reference: PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 Planning Department City Hall City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 located northwest corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road near Rancho California area. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. I'f any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Nahro Saoud of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Chief, Development Review Branch Art DATE RTE REQUEST TN~T THE ZTEH~ CHECKED BELOW BB ZNCLUDED ZN ~ CO~ZTIONS &PPROV~L FOR THZ~ ~R~ECT~ / ~L STRUT IHPROVEHENTS TO PR~ZOE ~ HALF--~ZDTH ~ THE STATE HIGHWAY. ~RB AND ~TTERF ~TATE STANDARD ~--~, ~Y~ ~--~ AL~G THE ~TATE HIGHWAY. ~ARKING SHALL BE PROHZBZTED AL~G THE ~TATE HIG~AY BY PA~NTZNG THE ~B RED AND/~ BY THE PRIER PbACEHENT OF K PARKING SIGNS. ~[US ~RB RETURNS SHALL BE PR~IDED AT TNTERSECT~S ~ITN THE ~TATE HIGN~AY. STATE STANDARD UHEELCHAZR R~PS SHALL BE PR~ZDED IN THE ~RB RETURNS. ~ ~SZTI~ ~H~LAR BARRZER AL~G THE PR~ERTY FReTAGE SHALL BE PR~ZbED TO LZHZT PHYSZ~L ACCESS TO THE ~TATE HiGHlY · YEHZCULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DE~L~ED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGHWAY. YEHZ~LAR ACCESS TO THE ~TA~E HIGH~AY SHALL BE PR~ZDED BY EXiSTiNG KBLZC R~ ~NECTZ~S. YEHI~LAR ACCESS TO THE ~TATE HIG~AY SHALL BE PR~IDED BY STANDARD DRI~VAYS. e ~EHZ~LAR ACCESS TO THE STATE .iG~AY SHALL BE PR~XDED BY A R~--TYPE C~NECTZ~. VEHZ~L~ ACCESS ~NECT[~S S~LL ~ PA~D AT LEAST .!THZN THE STATE HiGHrAY RIGHT OF ~Y. ~CCESS ~INTS TO THE STATE HIG~Y S~LL BE DE~L~ED IN A ~NNER T~T VILL PR~iDE SIGHT DISTANCE F~ ~H AL~G THE STATE HZG~AY. ~NDSCAP~NG AL~G THE STATE HZG~Y SHA~L PR~ZDE F~ ~FE SIGHT DISTANCE; C~LY UITH FIXED ~J~CT SET BACK AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS. ~ LEFT--TURN ~NE~ ZNCL~ZNG S~LDERS A~ ~Y NE~SSARY ~DENIHGF SULL BE PR~IDED m THE STATE NiGHrAY. ~ TRAFFIC S~Y i~IUTING ~ AK OFF--SiTE FL~ PATTERNS AK ~L~ES~ PR~ABLE IHPACTS AND PROSED HEAUES SHALL BE ~EPARED. 9ARKZNG S~LL BE DE~L~EO IN A ~NNER THAT riLL KT ~E ~Y ~HE~LAR ~HENT ~FLECTSF ZNCL~[NG PARKING STALL ENTRANCE ~D EXITF VZTNIN OF THE ENT~N~ FRm TK STATE HIG~Y. CARE SHALL K TAKEN VHEN DE~L~NG THiS PR~ERTY TO ~ESER~ ~ KRPET~TE THE EXTSTZNG DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE STATE HiGHlY. 9ARTZ~L~ ~SlDE~TZ~ SGLD K G~N TO ~TZ~ SNCR~SED STUN ~FF TO ZN~RE THAT A H[G~AY O~ZNAGE PR~LEH IS NOT ~EATED. //~LEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ~OZTZ~AL ~ENTS. 9~OY~D~ ~0 CONSTRUCTION/DENOLITIOR WITHIN PRESENT OR PROPOSED STATE RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS rdASTE ( ! ,, E .ASBESTOS; PETROCHE)IICALS I ETC. ) AND )lITIGATED AS PER REQUIRE)lENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES /WHEN PLANS ARE SUB)lITTED; PLEASE CONFOR)l TO THE REQUIRE)lENTS OF THE ATTACHED tlHANDOUT". THiS WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS AND TINE REQUIRED FOR PLAN CHECK. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT. ,ALTHOUGH THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THiS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTE)l; CONSIDERATION NIlST BE GIVEN TO THE CUI4JLATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPHENT IN THiS AREA. ANY )lEASURES NECESSARY TO )IITIGATE THE CUHULATIVE I)lPACT OF TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRioR TO OR WiTH DEVELOPWENT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THE)I. CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISION; OR FUTURE PROVISiON; OF SIGNILIZATION AND LIGHTING OF THE IHTERSECTIGN Of N4) THE STATE HIGW,~YkMEN WRRANTS ARE !~T. /IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEH OF THE AREA. ANY )lEASURES TO )lITIGATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE I)lPACTS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE DEVELOPHENT. THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY IS INCLLIOED IN THE CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN OF STATE HIGHWAYS ELIGIBLE FOR OFFiCiAL SCENIC HIGHWAY DESIGNATiON AND IN THE FUTURE YOUR AGENCY KAY WISH TO HAVE THiS ROUTE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY. THiS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY I AND DEVELOPWENT IN THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE CONPATIBLE WITH THE SCENIC NIGHWAY CONCEPT . IT iS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS CONSIDERABLE PUELIC CONCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO HEAVILY TRAVELLED HIGHWAYS · LAND DEVELOP)lENT I IN ORDER TO BE CO)IPATIBLE WiTH THIS CC~JCERN I NAY REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTENUATiON )lEASUREa. DEVELOPHENT OF THiS PROPERTY SHOULD INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY NOISE ATTENUATION. PLEASE BEND THE ITEK8 CHECKED BELOW TO: CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DEVELOP)lENT I:~VIEW BRANCH P.O. Box 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92402 // A copy OF ANY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR REVISED APPROVAL. //A COPY OF ANY DOCU)IENTS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL STATE NIGH~AY RIGHT OF WAY LJPOR RECORDATION OF THE NAP. // ANY PROPOSALS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC OR ENVIROR)IENTAL STUDY. // A CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL OR TRACT HAP. //A CHECK PRINT OF THE PLANS FOR ANY I)IPROVEHENTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE STATE #IGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY. ...... //A CHECK PRINT OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY ~HEN AVAILAELE. Date: March 13, 1991 Riv-79-R3.180 (Co-Rte-PM) PP 224/ PM 26852 / CZ 11 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: We need cross-sections at 50 ft intervals, from 100 ft each side of the project limits, within state Right-Of-Way (R/W). The cross- sections must conform to the requirements of the attached "HANDOUT". The Caltrans Right-Of-Way (R/W) line must be shown and labeled on the next submittal. The driveways connections should be compatible with the existing and future road system of the area. The centerline of proposed driveway shown approximately 520 ft southwesterly of Margarita Road must be located and constructed shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868, SHEET NO 5. The Rancho California ware] district property shall not have a separate access to state 'highway· Show the existing state 'stationing along the highway centerline according to the stations shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868. The Right-OF-Way in the Vicinity of Rancho California water district property does not agree with our record· The proposed driveway shown northwest of Winchester Road (HWY 79) must accommodate the DETECTOR SETBACK requirements (See attached sheet). State law requires Outdoor Advertising clearance for signs proposed adjacent to interstate and primary highways. Clearance must be obtained form: Highway Outdoor Advertising Branch California Department of Transportation 1120 N street Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 445-3337 0 0 0 ~ 0 t~ CO ~ GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657-3183 March 7, 1991 TO: ATTN: RE: City of Temecula Planning Department CZ 11 & PM 26852 The Riverside County Fire Department has no comments regarding the above referenced projects. All fire protection requirements will be addressed on related Plot Plan 224. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist LC/tm ~ LNDIO OFFICE 79-733 Count~/Clu~ I~ve, Suite F, tndio, CA 92201 (619) 3424~6 a FAX (619) 775-2072 PLANNING DIVISION I-! RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th Sm~, Riverside, CA 92501 ~ TE~ECUtA OmCE 41002 County Crater Drive, Suite 225, T~ecuta, CA 92390 (714) 694-5070 · FAX (714) 694-5076 ~ .~,'~.~.,~ ,~ r~-;,Cf~$~.o County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO: CITY OF TEMECULA A TN: Steve .3lann~no F'APECL MAF NO 26~_,5~ BATE: Health Smecla!lst IV 04-24-91 S o C o The Environmental Health Serv2ce$ D2v2s~on has reviewed the F'arcel Mar~ No. 26~5k for this Dro,~ect and cannot make any recommendatlc, n% until a ~anltat~on le. tt~r ~ filed. The requirements for a SAN $3 letter are aT follows: A $at2sfactory $o~1~ pefco!at&on test to prove the prc.~ect fea$2ble. A clearance letter from the appropriate C~1iforn~a ~eg2onal Water Oualltv Control Board. NOTE: For pro.~ect$ w~th~n the San Dlego Water Quality Control Board sphere of influence. a written clearance ~hall be required p.r~.D! to ~$$uance of a SAN 53. Two coD~es of the Parcel Map. A "w211-serve" letter from the agency/agencles servin~ potable water. Should the pro3ect be served sanitary sewer services, this Department would need only: A "w~ll-serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water and sanitary sewers, 2. One copy of the tentative map. If the Dro.]ect ~s to be served water by exzst2ng wells, pump~ and water tanks, a water supply permit will be requlred (contact the EHSD. Enu2neering Section at 27~- ~9~9). The requirements for a water supply permit are as follc, w$: City of Temecula F'age Two ATTN: Steve 31ann~no April 24, 1991 Satisfactory laboratory tests (bacterloloolcal, organic, inorganic, aenera] physical, and general m~neral) to prove the water potable. A complete set of plans showing all details of the proposed and existing water systems: sizes and types of pipe and calculations showing that adequate quantity and pressure can be maintained (Cal~fornia Waterworks Standards - California Health and Safety Code and California administrative Code, Title 22). The~e plans mu~t be signed by a registered ClVlC engineer. SM:dr _ ..~.t.l.~J_..COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNArDiNO COUNTY MUSEUM ,. E.ERA BERV, CES A .CY 2024 Orange Tree ~n, Redlands, i',"~= /~//Itt~X ~. ~'~ Director May 6, 1991 BCI General Contractors " attn: Rick Finken 28765 Sin&le Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 re:PALEO~OLOGIC ASSESS~, PARCEL ~P ~ 31361, ~CHO CALIFO~IA A~A, RIVERSIDE CO~Y Dear Mr. Finken, At your request, the San Bernardino County Musetml has conducted a paleontologic assessment, including a search of pertinent ~eolo~ic literature, a review of the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory, and a field survey for parcel # 21361, a 29- acre parcel in Rancho California, Riverside County. The parcel is on the northwest side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Franklin Avenue. Specifically, the parcel is within Townsh'ip 7 South and Range 3 West and if projected, falls within the southeast quarter of section 21, as shown on the Murrieta, CA 7.5 minute USGS topographic quadrangle map. Background Previous geologic mapping by Mann (1955) and Kennedy (1977) indicate that the parcel is located on recent alluvi[mt and on or 'near the Pauba Formation. These authors report fossil ' Pleistocene horse. The Pauba Formation overlies .the Bi~hop and thus is less than 700,000 years BP. Review of the Le~ional Paleontologic Locality Inventory at the San Bernardino County Museum does not. indicate that previous paleontologic resource a~sessments have been conducted for the Temecula parcel and that no paleontolosic localities are recorded within one mile of the parcel. However, more than 200 paleontolo&ic resource localities are known from the Pauba Formation in the Murrieta-Temecula area. The Pauba Formation unconformably overlies the Unnamed Sandstone. The faunal a.~sembla~e from the Pauba Fo[m%ation in the Temecula- Murrieta area, sun~arized ~,elow, suggests a late Irvingtonian/early Rancholabrean LMA in contrast to the ear]y- late Irvingtonian fauna from the Unnamed Sandstone in the California Oaks area (Reynolds and Reynolds, 1990). imperial manm~oth mastodon large camel 1 lama pronEhorn deer large horse small horse Jack rabbit. cottontai 1 shrew squirrel kangaroo rat pocket gopher deer mouse wood rat. vole king snake rattlesnake pond turtle toad chub fish land snail Methods The field asse:~sment was conducted on May 3, 1991, by Ouint. in Lake, Musetun Tech I I of the San Bernardino County Museum. He ]]as had previous experience in paleontologic resource assessments and salvage in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Parcel # 21361 was inspected by foot traverses at. approximately 30 meter intervals. Recent alluvitm~ was verified t.o occur on the parcel in association with the Santa Gert. rudis stream bed as was the presence of coarse to meditm%-grained sands interpreted to .... · represent the Pauba Formation. Results and Recommendations Available geologic literature describes the Pauba Formation as fossiliferous. Resource localities in the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory indicate that the Pauba Formation is very fossiliferous in the Murrieta-Temecula area. Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable g,aleontologic resources on the Temecula parcel. The developer must xetain a qualified vertebrate $,aleontologist to ~'~develop a g~rogram of mitigation for' the parcel which will conform to the guidelines of CEQA and Riverside County. The impact mitigation ~,rogram must include, but not be limited to: 1. Monitoring of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontoloEic resources by a qualified paleontologic monitor. The monitor should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments which are likely to contain the remains of small fossil mammals. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens· The most cost-efficient method of salvage of small fossils is to remove sediments containing the fossils to stockpiles offsite. The fossils can be removed by screen washing elsewhere while excavation continues or, site. -~- ,> 2. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification, includin~ washin~ of sediments to recover small vertebrates. This will allow the fossils to be described in a report of findings and reduces the volume of matrix around specimens being $to~ed. 3. Identification and curation of specimens into an established museum repository wit]] retrievable storage. ~. Preparation of a report of findings wit]] an appended itemized inventory of '-~pecimens. The rel:,ort and inventory, when submitted to the appropriate Lead Agency, signifies coml:,letion of the ~--,rogram to mitigate impacts to paleontolosic resources. References cited Kennedy, M.P., 1977. Recency and character of faultinE alone the Elsinore fault zone in southern Riverside County, California. California Division of M~.nes and Geolosy Special Report 131:12 p. Mann, J.F., 1955. GeoloEy of a portion of the Elsinore fault zone, California. California Division of Mines Special Report 63:22 p. Reynolds, R.E. and R.L. Reynolds, 1990. Irvingt. onian? faunas from the Pauba Formation, Temecula, Riverside County, California, i~ Abstracts of Proceedinss, 1990 Mojave Desert. Quaternary Research Symposi%m~. Redlands, San Bernardino ount¥ Musetin] Association Quarterly, 37(2):37. Kathleen Springer~Project Manager Earth Sciences SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM 2024 O,.nge Treel~~ 'F./R, edI~:~A 92374. {714)798-8570 · 422-1610 COUNTY OF SAN 8ERNARDIN0 GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY DR. ALLAN D. GRIESEMER INVOICE: ~050.0506.1 To: BCI General Contractors attn: Rick Finken, Project Manager 28765 $iJ]gle Oak Drive, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92390 For: PALEONTOLOGIC RECORDS SEARCH, PARCEL 21361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Regional Pale,.',ntologic Locality Inventory access fee and first hour: Field survey, 3 hrs @ $32./hr Mileage, 115 mi @ .38/.h~ Report, 3 hrs @ $32./hr TOTAL $50.00 96.00 ~3.70 96.00 $285.70 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 224 TO CONSTRUCT A 149,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER ON 19.7 ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROAD. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Plot Plan No. 224 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Plot Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on June 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a 9eneral plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the followin9 requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: ~:224~P.cc 25 a! There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP"} was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: {1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a! There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 22~ proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b! There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c! The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be ~..~4~P.cc 26 approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. (2) The City Council, in approving the proposed Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 22~ will be consistent with the City~s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The project, as proposed, conforms with existing applicable city zoning and development ordinances. Further, the proposal is characteristic of similar development approved by the City to date. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project is of insignificant scale in context of the broad goals and directives anticipated in the City~s General Plan. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 3~8, q60; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking, and landscaping are provided; as well as sufficient area to appropriately construct the proposed structure, reference proposed Plot Plan No. 22q, Exhibit E of the Staff Report. 5. The project, as designed and conditioned, a:224PP.C¢ 27 will not adversely affect the public health or welfare; nor will it adversely impact the built or natural environment as determined in the Initial Environmental Assessment of this proposal. Reference the attached project Conditions of Approval and Initial Environmental Study. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations, and reflects design aspects currently existing in the proposal~s general vicinity. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project site's primary frontage is on Winchester Road, a dedicated CalTrans right-of-way. Improvement of the abutting roadways shall be as per the City Engineering Department and CalTrans. The design of the project together with the type of supporting improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through, or use of the property within the proposed project. None are exhibited on the underlying parcel map, nor are easements evident on deed{ s) describing the property in question. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Supporting documentation is attached. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of a:224PP. cc 2 8 Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No. 22q for the operation and construction of 1~9,500 square foot retail center located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Resolution. SECTION ~...:.. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1991. RONALD J PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of June, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCI LMEMBERS NOES: COUNC I LMEMB ERS ABSENT: COUNC I LMEMB E RS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK R: 224PP. CC 2 9 PP-224 ATTACHMENT 6 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No: 22q Project Description: Retail Center of approximately 150,000 square feet. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-110-029 and 910-180-019 Planninq Department The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for 3 buildings for 115,280 square feet; 23,916 square feet; and 10,500 square feet. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan No. 22q. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. This approval shall be used within two { 2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two 12) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 22~ marked Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of Approval which are included herein. 7. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the ~:22~P.CC 3 0 PP-22~ provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated March 11, 1991, a copy of which is attached. e Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached. e Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated April 23, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County Geologist's transmittal dated April 23, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, three {3) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department of approval. The location, number, genus, species, .and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Landscape plans shall conform to conceptual landscape plans marked Exhibit G. ae Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. be Prior to occupancy the developer shall redesign the conceptual landscaping plans to include increased landscape area along the flood channel, increase landscaping along the Winchester side of the Costco building and to add Canopy trees to the landscaping plan. The applicant is to investigate using a Canopy tree instead of the Crepe Myrtle tree on the street frontage with the proposed Palm trees. The plans must be resubmitted for Planning Commission approval prior to installation. The landscape shall be installed prior to occupancy of the first building. 12. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. 13. A minimum of 749 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 749 parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit E. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base or as may be recommended by a qualified Soils Engineer. a:224PP.CC 31 PP-22~ A minimum of 9 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit E. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone " In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 15. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Planning Department Engineering Department Environmental Health Rancho Water District CalTrans School District Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Eastern Municipal Water District 16. A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. 17. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit F. am The building elevations are to be revised by adding architectural features to try to minimize the visual impact of the massive building. These elements could include the use of color strips, accent tile or other cosmetic additions. Revised elevations to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. 18. Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit F {Color Elevations). 19. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. 20. All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy a:224PP.CC 3 2 PP-22~ 21. 22. 23. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. This project is located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for liquefaction or subsidence. Where hazard of liquefaction or subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on {the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) (the number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one- half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 23 Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. The area does not have to be enclosed. Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. a:224~P.cc 33 PP-22~ 30. Within forty-eight (~8) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ( $1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.~(d)(2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and lq Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (~8) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~4(c). 31. A minimum of seven (7) loading spaces shall be provided as shown on approved Exhibit E. 32. A plot plan application must be processed for any approvals for any additional buildings other than the three approved by this plot plan. 33. Dedicate a 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement along Winchester Road prior to issuance of building permits. 3q. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 35. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District: Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department: CATV Franchise: A:224PP.CC 34 PP-22h CalTrans; and Parks and Recreation Department. 36. The developer shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 37. The developer shall submit two {2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 38. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 39. Prior to any work being performed, an application for Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this Ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer and all appropriate agencies. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans. Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer and all appropriate agencies shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities within the right-of-way. Prior to any work being performed on the private parking areas or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. q7. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all ~:224Pp.cc 35 PP-22~ --- 50. 51. 52. 53. 55. times with adequate detours during construction. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way. Winchester Road (Highway 79) The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping (street and parks). d. Sewer and domestic water systems. e. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Riverside County Flood Control District to outlet storm flows directly into the flood control channel. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. A:224.PP. CC 36 ..... PP-22~ 56. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 57. All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted through the undersidewalk drains. 58. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: 59. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 60. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 61. If deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be recorded. 62. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CalTrans. 63. In the event that Winchester Road (Highway 79} is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18-foot lane per CalTrans Standards (110~/13¥). The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March lt~, prior to occupancy. Margarita Road from Winchester Road (Highway 79) to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right- of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 { 86~/110s ). 65. Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V. Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V. Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. 66. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIRJNegative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of &:~24PP.CC 37 PP-22b __~ payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 67. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. 68. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 69. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer, and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard ~00 and ~01 (curb sidewalk). 70. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the City Engineer. 71. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. ~00 and ~01. 72. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. 73. This minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. 75. Construct all street improvements including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 76. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these ~:22~i~.cc 38 PP-22~ conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66t~62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. 77. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 78. A signing and striping plan shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans as determined by the City Engineer. 79. Plans for a traffic signal shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for the intersection of Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included for reference with the second plan check submittal of the street improvement plans. 80. Plans for a traffic signal shall be under design by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for the intersection of Winchester Road (Highway 79) and the approved entry point, and shall be included for reference with the second plan check submittal of the street improvement plans. 81. Traffic signal interconnect shall be under design by a Registered Civil Engineer to show 1 1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200 foot centers along the property fronting Winchester Road ( Highway 79). This design shall be shown on the traffic signal plans and must be approved by CalTrans and the City Engineer. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 82. All signing and striping shall be installed and functional per the approved plans and as approved in the field by CalTrans and the City Engineer. 83. The traffic signal for the intersection of Winchester Road ( Highway 79) at the approved access point shall be operational and complete per the approved plans. The traffic signal interconnect shall be installed in place per the approved plans. 85. Interim traffic control shall be provided at developer's expense for the a:Z24PP.CC 39 PP-22~ intersection of Margarita Road and Winchester Road (Highway 79) as warranted after review of the intersection and an Amendment to the approved traffic study has been provided as directed by the City Engineer. ~:224P~,.cc 40 TO: FROM: liE: (Jounty or' lt versKle DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA DATE: ATTN: Steve Jiannino PLOT PLAN NO. 2Z4 03-11-91 The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 224 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services should be available in this area· Prior to any building plan submittals, the following items will be required: "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan e~aminers at (714) 358-517Z). A c__[~a.L~.rLC_e__~_[k~ from the Hazardous Materials Management Branch Services (3on Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the pro3ect has been cleared for: a. Underground storage tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185). d. Waste reduction Management. SM:dr cc: Jori Mohoroski, Hazardous Materials Branch CX:X,,I.C~,.002 ~EY. 1 ,i/at '-' RIVERSIDE COUNTY ' FIRE DEPARTMENT It0 WEST S&N JACINqO AVFNUE e~ PE.~S, CALII:ORNL% (~ 657-~183 OL~N J. NEWMAN' !:IRF. CIAT~P April 23, 19~1 CITY OF T~E~%~A. AT'~ J ?LANN ING DEI;T PLOT PLAN 224 ~lct pla~, the Firs Department recc~ms:~s the following ~tre protection recosniza~ f!re protection atan~arde: ~ 1, The [ire Department ~s ~equired tc se: a minimum fire flow fez the ram. de! or constructism of el! ccm~ercia! buildings using the procedure established in O~dinance $~b. ' P~ovxde o:' ahoy there exists a voter syats~ capable of deliveries 4000 OFH for a 3 hou~ ~uration at 20 ~S: reeldual operating pressure, wb£cb must he available before any c.~u~tible material is p~ace~ on the Job site, A combination og on-site an~ off-site aupec fire hydrants, ~n a loopa~ system (6"x~"21x2½)o viA1 be loeate~ not less than 2~ feet or m~a ~han 165 feet fram. any pottles of the building as neecured along approve& weblanier trave!waye. ~e require~ f~re fl,~w shall be available from any adjacent hydr~n~(s~ i~ the system. The required f~re flow wy he ad]vsta~ at a later point in ithe per. it process ~e reflect changes in design, construction ~ype, area separation o~ b~ilt-in ~ire proCackles measures. Applicant/~evelop,r .hal{ ~u~ish one copy of the ~ater t~e F~re Depart. at ~or ~eviev. ?lan~ .hall con~o~ to fire hydrant requirements. Pla~e ehaIl ba nigher/approved by a retiste~ed civil and the l~aal wate~ company ~ith the fol!ovi~ ce~tiflcatiou: oe~ti~y that the deais~ of the water system ~s in accordance v~th req~ireme~e prescribed by ~hs ~Lverei~a Couz~y Fire B~partmen~." I PAY ¢eq. A) ~. _~t.A el. TaCk ~LOT I~LA~ 22~ PA~E 2 ~nd~cs~or va~e a~d f~e ~e~artme~t co~nec~So= shall be ~ocited t~ the bu~S(s), A statemen~ ~hmt the buildt~(s~ viii be autom~,~tc&lly fire e~t~klorsd mue~ be /ccludmd on the title paBe of the bull~i~ pla~a. :3~e~ ~e submitted ~o the Flee Dep~rrm. e~ £cr apprava~ p~ic~'tc inmcaila~ion, aa per ~¢. ~ Sta~emen~ ~ha~ the BuAldin~ will be au~c~ac£cally ftg~ sprinkLered m'~s~ appea: o~ the title pa~e o~ the buildi~$ plan=. Cods. 11. Cer~i~ designate6 ar~&s vlil be zequire~ ~o be main~ai~e~ as ~ir, lazer, 12. !z~a!l por~abie fire ex:i~$ulsherl wl~h s m~nimum w&~im~ o~ 2A-~ORC. ¢on~ac: a cs~l~te~ sz~in~utshe~ company £o~ pro~e~ ~lacemen~ o£ eq~Ap~en~. 13. Prior :o ~ha iss~ance of bulldl~ ps.--,~cl, the e~pltcaut/devalcpez shell be responsible to submi~ a check. or money o~der ~n ~he amswrit of $~5~.00 ~O the Xlverside ~ovu~y Fire De~ar~men~ fo~ plan check fees. Prior to the tssu£nce o~ buildinS pe~m[~e, ~he developer shall deposit, wZth ~he City ci Tamscuba, a c~eck or money erda= equaling ~he sum of 2~C pe~ ~qua~e ~oct aS mi~lp~ic~ lot ~lre protection impacts. T~Is amount must be sub~i:~e~ separately_~rom t~e plan chec~ revlew fees. ~he ~uildt~j an~ $a~et~ O~ice. All quet:[ons regarding ~he ~ean!n$ of conditions shall be referred to the Pia~in$ a~ ~nsineerins sta~. ~y Laura Cabzal, Fire ~afe~y Specialist Lc/t~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT April 15, 1991 "J.F. Davi(~son Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 340 Temecul a, CA 92390 At=an[ten: David B. Saari Ladies an~ Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Map 26852 Plo~ Plan 224 City of Te~ecul& You have sent us material regarding these cases for our "review as a Land Use case and as a land subdivision". We do not make floodproofing recommendations or write flood hazard reports for projects in Incorporated cities. But it is appropriate [hat we comment on Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel since we are involved w~th the flood control aspects of Assessment Distr~ct 161. We have recently approved the plans for Santa Ger%rudis Creek Channel. The channel will capture end safely convey the 100 year s~orm runoff in that stream when it has been constructed in its entirety according to plans, and when surrounding l&nU developments have been brought up to grade as proposed. If [he projec[ is constructed in stages, as we understand is now being considered, additional study would be necessary %o determine its performance. It should also be noted that ASsessment District 161 has not yet made application for a Conditional Letter of Na~ Revision (CLONR) from the Federal E~ergency Managemen~ Agency (FEIMA). Properties within the F£MA ~pped floodplain will remain subject [o flood insurance requirements until FEMA has t~sued & letter of Nap Revision (LOMR), and the District cannot guarantee that FEMA will find the proposed improvements acceptable. The District will not accept the Santa ~rtrudts Channel for operation and maintenance until it has been co~pleted, all necessary ~radtn~ adjacent to %he channel has been completed, approval by FENA. C: City of Temecula Engineering Department 9edford Properties At[n: Greg Erickson RANPAC Attn: Chuck Collins and the improvemen[e have been H. KASHU~A or Clvil Engineer JHK:Dln April 23, 1991 Ranpat Soils, Inc. 41710 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Christopher Krall Won $. Yoo subject: Liquefaction Hazard Work Order No. 690-161 Plot Plan 224 A.P.N.: 910-110-029 County teDlogic Report No. 793 City of Tamecula Gentlemen: We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled ,'Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Margarita Meadows Commercial Center, Winchester and Margarita Road, Temecula, CA," dated November 1, 1990. Your report determined that: # 1. The potential for liquefaction of the subsurface soils at this site during a seismic event is considered to be moderate. The most significant effect of liquefaction at the site would be settlement of the ground surface. Indicated settlement on the order of one inch would Be possible on localized areas of the site. Differential settlement at the site from zero to one inch is likely to occur across distances of 300 feet or more. 3* Other effects of liquefaction including loss of bearing capacity, san4 boils and lateral spreading are considered' ~nlikely. Your report recommended that: 1. All foundations shall be constructed entirely in compacted fill. The depth of fill shall extend a minimum of tWO fOOting widths beneath the base of the footing withe minxmum of ~ feet end maximum of 8 ~eet. The area of recompaction shall extend five feet' outside the foundation.per~meter. STREET, ~JTH FLOOR l~OR!:'t ~;~Z33 COUNTRY CLUB' DI~'iVE: 'SU~T BFRMUDA DUNES. CALIFORNIA 92 YPOI'l RIU C,:T;, F'LANt. IIt.(G [,EF'T, co,~pacted fill. ~res~ure for theoc rooL~n~s ~dor c,,mb~e~ dedd end · tetLo l~ve lo~do 1~ 2000 pl~. A) lowable bearing ot 4 in,~hes nominal for ligh[Ay loa,led fleONG. Fill ~1opeS 0hall ~,~ 9roporl~ keye~, be.ch~d and Appeud{w 2 ot VO~ fepor~. IL is our oyln{~n that ~e Tepor~ wau prepared in ~ COmponent California ~v~ro~cntal ~,,~lity Act =ovl~w. Final apl,roval of %h~ ~eport ~s hwreby q~ven. rmcomm~ndatlone mad- in your report cone%fusion o~' ~h~ p~o~c~. truly yourO dOCOph ~Rlchard~, t',~n~q DiCot. or steve. k~ Kupfo~, ~n~o~ir,~ Oeoloqist ~or m{t£g&tion of %n I.he acc~.gn .rid DISTRICT 8,P.O. ~OX 231 8AN BK~A~XNO, ~ 92402 ~DD (7~4) 3g3-460g April 16, 1991 08-Riv-79-R2.86/R3.18 Planning Department Attention: Steve Jiannino City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 Your Reference: Plot Plan 224, Parcel Map 26852, Chanqe of Zone Dear Mr. Jiannino: An Encroachment Permit will be required for the proposed Grading, Signage and Landscaping within the State R/W. In addition, Caltrans' Development Review branch has the following concerns: ~he connection to State Highway 79 (SH 79) called out as a 50' .Driveway, approximately 1200 feet southwest of Margarita Road, must be a street connection, not a driveway, as shown on Permit application 90-1868 and as agreed to in several previous meetings between Caltrans personnel and JF Davidson engineers. Access to the proposed development must be taken off this local street, not off of the State highway. Perhaps the developer might consider a cul-de-sac configuration to accomplish this. j The Traffic Study done for Assessment District 161 (widening of Winchester Road) by Kunzman and Associates did not study this intersection to determine the need for signalization. If signals are to be constructed, warrants must be met. The access shown approximately 500 feet southwest of margarita Road is intended to serve the Rancho California Water District property only. It may not be used as an additional access to the proposed development. Also, it must conform to the configuration shown on Permit application 90-1868 (see attached, highlighted mockup of that access point). The Water Dlstrict access shall be a Caltrans standard NS-A, Case A, type of driveway· Curb returns are not permitted. Details and elevations of the proposed Pylon Signage at the Site Entry from SH 79 must be submitted a part of the Permit application package. In addition to the above-noted concerns, this office must see the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) Conditions of Approval Grading and drainage Plans (not conceptuals) A copy of any documents providing additional State R/W A copy of the Traffic Study A check print of the Parcel Map (not Tentative Map). The map need not be signed and recorded, but must be stamped with the City's "Stamp of Approval". A check print of any plans for improvements within the State R/W (including Landscaping Plans) If you should have any questions, please call Mr. Ahmad Salah or Mr. Mike Sim at (714) 383-4384. Thank you for your cooperation· Sincerely, District Development Review Engineer STATE Of CALIFC~NIA.~USINE$S, TRAN~PCglTATI4~I AND HOldING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT Io P.O. K)X 231 SAN ~ERNARDINO, CALIFC~NIA 92402 TDD (714) 3~3-4609 March 14, 1991 Planning Department City Hall City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 PETE WILSON, Gc)~mor Development Review 08-Riv-79-R3. 180 Your Reference.' PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 located northwest corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road near Rancho Calif.ornia area. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. I'f any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Nahro Saoud of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Chief, Development Review Branch Att YGUR ]~EFEBENCE PLAN CHEClCER DATE RTE WE REQUEST THAT THE ITEHS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS APPROVAL FOR THIS PRO~ECT: / //._ NOBEL HIGHT OF MY DEDI~TION TO PR~IDE ~'~' HALF--glDTH ON THE STATE HIGHgAY. / NOBEL STRUT IHPROVEHENTS TO PROVIDE ~'~ HALF--gIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHgAY. CURB AND GUTTER, STATE STANDARD /~/,~-/~, TYPE /~2~- ~ ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY. PARKING SHALL BE PHOHIBITED ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY BY PAINTING THE CURB RED AND/C)~ BY THE PROPER PLACEHENT OF NO PARKING SIGNS. RADIUS CURB RETURNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS UITH THE STATE HIGHgAY. STATE STANDARD gHEELCNAIR RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CURB RETURNS. A POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY. VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGHgAY. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC HOAD CONNECTIONS. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STANDARD DRIVEgAYS . 3dYEH!CLN. Aq AD:ZSS SI4ALL NOT BE P~3VIDED glTHIN OF T~ INTERSECTION AT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A ROAD-TYPE CONNECTION. ~EHICULAR ACCESS CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PAVED AT LEAST g!THIN THE STATE HIGHgAY RIGHT OF ~AY. ACCESS POINTS TO THE STATE NIGHgAY SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A NANHER THAT giLL PROVIDE SIGHT DISTANCE FC~ ~ HPH ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY. LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY SHA~L PROVIDE FOB SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE I CO~PLY UITH FIXED OR~ECT SET 8AC~ AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS. __ A LEFT--TURN LANE ~ INCLUDING SHOULDERS AND ANY NECESSARY glOENING~ SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE HIGHgAY. A TRAFFIC S~Y INDICATING ON AND OFF--SITE FLOg PATTERNS AND VI:)L~W4ES I PROBABLE IHPACTS AND PROPOSED HITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED. PARKING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A HANGER THAT gILL NOT CAUSE ANY VEHICULAR NOVEI4ENT CCX4FLICTSF INCLUDING PARKING STALL ENTRANCE AND EXIT; gITHIN OF THE ENTRANCE FRON THE STATE NIGH~Y. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN gHEN DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTY TO PRESERVE ANt) PERPETUATE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE STATE NIGHgAY. PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO CUI4ULATIVE INCHEASED STOBH RUNOFF TO INSURE THAT A HIGHWAY DRAINAGE PROBLEH IS NOT CREATED. //PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIONAL CC~HENTS. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT. COHSTRUCTIGId/DENOLITIOR gITHIM PRESENT OR PROPOSED STATE RIGHT OF gAY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS UASTE ( I.E.ASBESTOS; PETROCHEMICALS; ETC. ) AND MITIGATED AS PER REQUIREHENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. /WHEN PLANS ARE SUBHITTED, PLEASE C(~FORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATTACHED "HANDOUTIt. THIS gILL EXPEDITE THE '.REVIEV PROCESS AND TIME REQUIRED FOR PLAN (.qNECK. PROVTDF- TO APP~CA~q'T. ALTHOUGH THE' TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEAR TO H~VE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT C~ THE STATE HIGHgAY SYSTEHI CONSIDERATIOR MOST BE GIVEN TO THE CI~LATIVE EFFECT OF CORT1NUED DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA. ANY HEASURES NECESSARY TO MITIGATE THE DJ~LATIVE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO OR UITH DEVELOPHENT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THEM. CONSIDERATIOR SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISIOR, OR FUTURE PROVISIOR, OF SIGNILIZATION AND LIGHTING OF THE INTERSECTIOR O~ A)D THE STATE HIG~4t.Y L/TT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THiS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT OR THE STATE HIGHgAY SYSTEM OF THE AREA. ~IY MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE IMPACTS SHALL BE INCLUDED gITH THE DEVELOPHENT. THIS PORTIOH OF THE STATE HIGHgAY IS INCLUDED IN THE CALIFORNIA MASTER ~)LAN OF STATE HIGHgAYS ELIGIBLE FOR OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGHgAY DESIGNATIOR AND IN THE FUTURE Y~R AGENCY ~Y UISH TO ~ THIS R~TE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHgAY. THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHgAY HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHgAY i AND DEVELOP#ENT IN THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE CC~4PATIBLE glTH THE SCENIC HIGHgAY CONCEPT. IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS CONSIDERABLE PUBLIC CORCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO HEAVILY TRAVELLED HIGHgAYS. ~ND DEVELOPMENT I IN ORDER TO BE COHPATIBLE gITH THIS CORCERN, HAY REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTENUATION MEASURES. DEVELOP!dENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHOULD INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY NOISE ATTENUATION. BEND '~HE' CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DEVELOPHENT P~VlEV BRANCH P.O. Box 231 SAH B~R#ARDINO, CA 92402 ~.~ A COPY OF ANY CORDITID~S OF APPROVAL OR REVISED APPROVAL. //A COPY OF ANY DO~ENTS PROVIDING ADDITIORAL STATE HIGHgAY RIGHT Of ~Y ~ REC~DATI~ OF THE ~P. // ~y PR~OSALS TO F~THER DE~L~ THIS PR~ERTY. A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY. ~ A CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL OR I'~L*CT HAP- ~A CHECK PRINT OF THE PLANS FOR ANY IMPROVEME#TS gITHIM OR ADJACENT TO THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF gAY. //A CHECK PRINT OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY ~HEN AVAILABLE. Date: March 13, 1991 Riv-79-R3.180 (Co-Rte-PM) PP 224/ PM 26852 / CZ 11 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: We need cross-sections at 50 ft intervals, from 100 ft each side of the project limits, within state Right-Of-Way (R/W). The cross- sections must conform to the requirements of the attached "HANDOUT" The Caltrans Right-Of-Way (R/W) line must be shown and labeled on the next submittal. The driveways connections should be compatible with the existing and future road system of the area. The centerline of proposed driveway shown approximately 520 ft southwesterly of Margarita Road must be located and constructed as shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868, SHEET NO 5. The Rancho California ware' ..... district property shall not have a separate access to stat~ highway· Show the existing state stationing along the highway centerline according to the stations shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868. The Right-OF-Way in the Vicinity of Rancho California water district property does not agree with our record. The proposed driveway shown northwest of Winchester Road (HWY 79) must accommodate the DETECTOR SETBACK requirements (See attached sheet). State law requires Outdoor Advertising clearance for signs proposed adjacent to interstate and primary highways. Clearance must be obtained form: Highway Outdoor Advertising Branch California Department of Transportation 1120 N street Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 445-3337 D n~r9 I aar9 0 0 0 ~ 0 '" SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM ,. 2024 Orange Tree Line * Redlands, CA 92374 1714} 798-8570 422.161(I J[ ~ay 6, 1991 BCI General Contractors attn: Rick Fin)ten 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 re: PALEONTOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, PARCEL MAP # 21361. RANCHO CALIFORNIA AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Dear Mr. Finken, At. your request, the San Bernardino County MuseLm~ has conducted a paleontologic assessment, including a search of pertinent geologic literature, a review of the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory, and a field survey for parcel # 21361, a 29- acre parcel in Rancho California, Riverside County. The parcel is on the northwest side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Franklin Avenue. Specifically, the parcel is within Township 7 South and Range 3 West. and if projected, falls within the southeas~ quarter of section 21, as shown on the Murrieta, CA 7.5 minute USG$ topographic quadrangle map. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY Background Previous geologic mapping by Mann (1955) and Kennedy (1977) indicate that the parcel is located on recent alluvim~ and on or 'near the Pauba Formation. These authors report fossil · Pleistocene horse. The Pauba Formation overlies the Bi=~hop Ash and thus is less than 700,000 years BP. Review of the Le&ional Paleontolo~ic Locality Inventory at the San Bernardino County Museum does not indicate that previous paleontologic resource a~sessments have been conducted for the Temecula parcel and that no paleontoloEic localities are recorded within one mile of the parcel. However, more than 200 paleontologic resource localities are known from the Pauba Formation in the Murrieta-Temecula area. The Pauba Formation unconformably overlies the Unnamed Sandstone. The faunal a~semblaEe from the Pauba Formation in the Temecula- Murrieta area, s%m~arized below, suggests a late ~rvinEtonian/early Rancholabrean LMA in contrast to the ear]y- late Irvingtonian fauna from the Unnamed Sandstone in the California Oaks area (Reynolds and Reynolds, 1990). imperial m~m~oth mastodon large cantel 11 area pronghorn deer large horse small horse Jack rabbit. cottontai 1 shrew squirrel kan~al-oo rat pocket ~opher deel- mouse wood rat. vole king snake rattlesnake pond turtle toad chub fish land snail Methods The field assessment was conducted on May 3, 1991, by Quintin Lake, MuseLm~ Tech I I of the San Bernardino County Muse%m%. He ]]as had previous experience in paleontoloEic resource assessments and salvaze in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Parcel # 21361 was inspected by foot traverses at approximately 30 meter intervals. Recent alluvitm~ was verified to occur on the parcel in association with the Santa Gertrudis stream bed as was the presence of coarse to medi~m~-Erained sands interpreted to · represent the Pauba Formation. Results and Recommendations Available EeoloEic literature describes the Pauba Formation as fossiliferous. Resource localities in the ReEional Paleontolo~ic Locality Inventory indicate that the Pauba Formation is very fossiliferous in the Murrieta-Temecula area. Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontolo~ic resources on the Temecula parcel. The developer must /'etain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to ~develop a pro,ram of mitigation for the parcel which will conform to the 8uidelines of CEQA and Riverside County. The impact mitigation pro8ram must include, but not be limited to: 1. MonitorinE of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontoloEic resources by a qualified paleontoloEic monitor. The monitor should be equipped to salvaEe fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments which are likely to contain the remains of small fossil mammals. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert e~ipment to allow removal of abundant or larEe specimens. The most cost-efficient method of salvaEe of small fossils is to remove sediments containinE the fossils to stockpiles offsite. The fossils can be removed by screen washin~ elsewhere while excavation continues on site. 2. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification, includin~ washing of sediments to recover small vertebrates. This will allow the fossils to be described in a report of findings and reduces the volume of matrix around specimens be~nE stored. 3. Identification and curation of specimens into an established museum repository with retrievable storage· ~. Preparation of a report. of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens. The report and inventory, when submitted to the approl:.riate Lead Agency, signifies completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic resources. References cited Kennedy, M.P. , 1977. Elsinore fault zone in southern Riverside County, California. California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 131:12 p. Mann, J.F., 1955. Geology of a portion of the Elsinore fault zone, California. C. alifornia Division of Mines Special Report ~3:22 p. Reynolds, R.E. and R.L. Reynolds, 1990. Irvingtonian? faunas from the Pauba Formation, Te,necula, Riverside County, · California, ~!! Abstracts of Proceedings, 1990 Mojave Deser' Quaternary Research $¥mposi%m3. Redlands, San Bernardino ~ount.¥ Museum Association Quarterly, 37(2):37. Kathleen $prinEer~ Project. Manager Earth Sciences Recency and character of faulting along the 'SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM ~__2024 Oreno, Treez, Ji~~ °F..,R,'cI~r~§..~A 92374' i714)798-8670 · 422-1610 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN' GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY DR. ALLAN D. GRIESEMER Director INVOICE: ~050.0506.! To: BC! General Contractors attn: Rick Fin].:en, Project. Manager 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200, Temecula, C~ 92390 For: PALEONTOLOGIC RECORDS SEARCH, PARCEL 21361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Regional Pale,:,ntolo~ic Locality Inventory access fee and first hour: Field survey, 3 hrs @ $32./hr Mileage, 115 mi @ .38/h~ Report, 3 hrs @ $32./hr TOTAL $50.00 96.00 k3.70 96.00 $285.70 Recommendation: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 17, 1991 Case No.: Change of Zone No. 11 Plot Plan No. 224 Parcel Map No. 26852 Prepared By: Steve Jiannino That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council: ADOPT a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 11, Plot Plan No. 224, and Parcel Map No. 26852; ADOPT Resolution 91- recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 11 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report; e ADOPT Resolution 91- recommending approval of Plot Plan No. 224 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and ADOPT Resolution 91- recommending approval of Parcel Map No. 26852 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTAT IVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT ION: Bedford Development Co. J.F. Davidson Associates and Herron F, Rumansoff Change of Zone from R-R (Rural Residential) to C- P-S {Scenic Highway Commercial) on 24 acres of a 97.3 acre site, construction of a 149,500 square feet commercial center on 19.7 acres and subdivide 97.3 acres into 13 parcels with two remainder parcels. Northwest corner of Margarita and Winchester Roads. A: PP22t[ I EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: SWAP DESIGNATION: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: R-R (Rural Residential) North: R-R South: R- R East: R- R West: R - R ( Rural Residential ) ( Rural Residential) ( Rural Residential) ( Rural Residential) Scenic Highway Commercial) Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant/Industrial Commercial Vacant Vacant Vacant C I Commercial ) Project Area: No. of Lots: Proposed Zone Change: No. of Buildings: Total Building Square Footage: Total Parking Provided: Total Parking Required: Buildings are Proposed on Lots: 97.32 acres 13 + 2 remainders C-P-S on Lots 1-13 3 149,696 sq.ft. 859 spaces 749 spaces and 13 The Change of Zone, Parcel Map and Plot Plan were submitted to the City Planning Department February 20, 1991. The Plot Plan was requested previously, but could not be processed without the zone change due to the fact that the proposed use was not consistent with the R-R zoning. The project has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee I DRC), both at a Pre-DRC and a Formal DRC meeting. This site is within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 161. Construction has begun on the first phase development of the Assessment District. This construction includes the widening of Winchester Road between Margarita and Ynez Roads, along with the Santa Gertrudis Creek Flood Channel improvements. The project has involved negotiations with CalTrans on the location and access to driveways along Winchester Road. CalTrans has also been involved A:PP224 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: in the discussions involving the signalization of the two intersections shown on Plot Plan No. 224. The applicant has received approval of the proposed improvements and signalization for Winchester Road as proposed for Plot Plan No. 224. This project proposes a Change of Zone from R-R {Rural Residential) to C-P-S {Scenic Highway Commercial) on 24 acres, on proposed Lots 1-13 of Parcel Map No. 26852, to subdivide 97.3 acres into 13 parcels with two remainder parcels and to construct three retail commercial buildings totaling 149,696 square feet on Lots 4, 7 and 13 of Parcel Map No. 26852 located on the northwest corner of Margarita and Winchester Roads. Chanqe of Zone No. 11 Change of Zone No. 11 proposes a change in zoning classification from R-R to C-P-S on 24 acres fronting the north side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and RCWD well site No. 108. The Southwest Area Plan {SWAP) designation for the area is C, Commercial. The proposed C-P-S zoning is consistent with the SWAP designation. An industrial park development has been constructed to the northwest of the site and the proposed regional mall is being processed to the south across Winchester Road. Winchester Road is being improved as part of Assessment District No. 161 to a 134 foot right-of-way urban arterial. The Assessment District is also responsible for the construction of flood control drainage ways and main sewer lines. The first phase of the construction has begun with major infrastructure being done around this site. Parcel Map No. 26852 Parcel Map No. 26852 is a proposal for a 13 lot commercial subdivision of the 24 acres fronting the north side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and RCWD well site No. 108 with two large remainder parcels on a 97 acre site. The 13 parcels cover the same area as being proposed for Change of Zone No. 11. The remainder parcels are separated from the other lots by Santa Gertrudis Creek and Margarita Road. A: PP224 3 The site is within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 161. The Assessment District was formed to provide major infrastructure improvements along Winchester road within the City and County boundaries. The first phase of construction for the Assessment District is already under way. The first phase improvements include construction of Winchester Road from Margarita Road to Ynez Road, the channelization of Santa Gertrudis Creek, and portions of Margarita Road. These improvements provide necessary infrastructure for the construction of the proposed commercial center within the proposed Parcel Map boundaries. The proposed access points for the parcels have been tentatively approved by CaITrans. The remainder of the frontage along Winchester Road would have restricted access. The access points also provide access to Rancho California Water well sites. The developer will also record reciprocal access and maintenance agreements between the parcels for access, drainage and parking facilities. The proposed Parcel Map conforms to the proposed development for Plot Plan No. 224 and possible future development along the Winchester Road frontage. Development is currently being proposed for Parcels 4, 7 and 13, with the other parcels being available for future development. The City is requesting a 25 feet wide easement along Winchester Road for a future transportation corridor as required by SWAP. The applicant is protesting this requirement since it does not exist on current developments and will not be easily obtained in some areas. The 25 feet is not a requirement of CatTrans, it is a part of the adopted SWAP Transportation Plan. Plot Plan No. 224 Plot Plan No. 224 proposes the construction of a lq9,696 square feet commercial center. The project consists of 3 buildings with a major building being 115,280 square feet. The proposed tenant for this building is Costco. The other buildings are 23,916 and 10,500 square feet. The proposal provides for two access points on Winchester and Margarita Roads. The access points on Winchester Road have been tentatively approved A: PP22tt t~ GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: by CalTrans with the access drive closest to Margarita providing access to RCWD well site No. 110 and the project. The proposed development complies with current code development standards in regards to parking and interior traffic circulation. The site design has been reviewed by City Staff at Pre and Formal Development Review Committee meetings. The applicant has addressed Staff~s concerns regarding the site design for the project. The applicant made modification to the parking layout and eliminated the proposed development along Winchester Road at Staffms request. Staff had concerns regarding the free standing pad concept originally proposed along Winchester Road. A Plot Plan application or other appropriate City application will be required to be processed and approved prior to any building construction on any parcels other than Parcels ~, 7 and 13 of Parcel Map No. 26852. The overall circulation and access points to Winchester and Margarita Roads are being established with this development. The proposed architecture for the project is Neo Mediterranean incorporating the use of stucco, concrete tile roof treatment, concrete block, parapet wall and archways. The applicant is providing architectural treatment to the building by the use of plant-on features to provide movement in the flat building face. The increased architectural treatment is being provided on the elevations that face the public right-of-way. The project is consistent with the SWAP designation of C ICommercial) and 2-5 DU/AC (dwelling units per acre). The area encompassing Change of Zone No. 11 and Plot Plan No. 22~ is designated C ~ Commercial), while the area designated 2-5 DU/AC is the remainder portion of Parcel Map No. 26852. The remainder area designated as 2-5 DU/AC is a part of Specific Plan no. 255 which is currently being processed by the City. The proposed Parcel Map, Zone Change and Plot Plan are consistent with other proposed developments along Winchester Road. As such, it is likely that Change of Zone No. 11, Parcel Map No. 26852 and Plot Plan No. 22~ will be consistent with the ultimate City General Plan when it is adopted. A: PP22L~ 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINCS: Pursuant to applicable portions of the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA), an Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared for the project. Based on the assessment, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is being recommended for adoption. Chancle of Zone No. 11 The proposed Change of Zone will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. e There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is compatible with the surrounding proposed development, zoning, and SWAP. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is compatible with surrounding development and improvements. The site is physically suited for the proposed Change of Zone in that required infrastructure exists or is being provided in the area including commercial roadways, drainege facilities, and main sewer and water lines. The proposed Change of Zone is consistent with the SWAP designation of C { Commercial ). The zone change will be beneficial by providing an area for needed services and employment. A: PP22~ 6 FINDINGS: Parcel Map no. 26852 The proposed Parcel Map will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the surrounding proposed development, zoning and SWAP. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,due to the fact that the project is consistent with surrounding proposed development. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law due to the fact that the project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. ~60, Schedule E. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density due to the fact that the project has access to public roads and sufficient building area. e The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as determined in the initial study. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities due to the fact that the lots are large enough to provide sufficient southern exposure with passive or active solar possibilities. A: PP22~ 7 FINDINGS: 10. 11. All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic, access is provided from Winchester and Margarita Roads· The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as conditioned. The project will not interfere with any easements. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Plot Plan No. 22q There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 22t~ will be consistent with the City~s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The project, as proposed, conforms with existing applicable city zoning and development ordinances. Further, the proposal is characteristic of similar development approved by the City to date. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the Cityis future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project is of insignificant scale in context of the broad goals and directives anticipated in the City~s General Plan. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, ~60; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). A: PP22tt 8 e e Be The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking, and landscaping are provided; as well as sufficient area to appropriately construct the proposed structure, reference proposed Plot Plan No. 224, Exhibit E of the Staff Report. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare; nor will it adversely impact the built or natural environment as determined in the Initial Environmental Assessment of this proposal. Reference the attached project Conditions of Approval and Initial Environmental Study. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations, and reflects design aspects currently existing in the proposal~s general vicinity. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project sirens primary frontage is on Winchester Road, a dedicated CaITrans right-of-way. Improvement of the abutting roadways shall be as per the City Engineering Department and CalTrans. The design of the project together with the type of supporting improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through, or use of the property within the proposed project. None are exhibited on the underlying parcel map, nor are easements evident on deedl s) describing the property in question. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Supporting documentation is attached. A: PP22~ 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 11, Plot Plan No. 224, and Parcel Map No. 26852; ADOPT Resolution No. 91- recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 11 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report; ADOPT Resolution No. 91- recommending approval of Plot Plan No. 224 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and ADOPT Resolution 91- recommending approval of Parcel Map No. 26852 based on the Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SJ: ks Attachments: 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. Resolution for Change of Zone No. 11 Resolution for Parcel Map No. 26852 Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map No. 26852 Resolution for Plot Plan No. 224 Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan No. 224 Initial Study Exhibits A. Vicinity Map B. SWAP Map C. Change of Zone No. 11 D. Parcel Map E. Plot Plan F. Elevations A: PP22~ 10 gZ-11 .... ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ZONE NO. 11 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R IRURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-P-S {SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PAR CEL NO. 910-110-029, 031; 910-180-026, 027; AND 910-130-028, 029, 031. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Change of Zone No. 11 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Change of Zone application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Change of Zone on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Change of Zone; NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING C~ISSION DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findin~s. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government 'Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty {30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. { 2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: A: PP22q. 11 SZ-11 a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, I hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Change of Zone, makes the following findings, to wit: a) The proposed Change of Zone will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. b) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is compatible with the surrounding proposed development, zoning, and SWAP. c) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is compatible with surrounding development and improvements. A: PP22q. 12 CZ-11 ~. d) The site is physically suited for the proposed Change of Zone in that required infrastructure exists or is being provided in the area including commercial roadways, drainage facilities, and main sewer and water lines. e) The proposed Change of Zone is consistent with the SWAP designation of C ~ Commercial ). The zone change will be beneficial by providing an area for needed services and employment. D. The Change of Zone is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Zone Change No. 11 to change the zoning on 2~ acres of land from R-R I Rural Residential ) to C-P-S {Scenic Highway Commercial) on property located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads. SECTION PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June. 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHA I RMAN A: PP22~ 13 CZ-I 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof. held on the 17th day of June, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PP22~4 1 ~ ?~-26852 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 26852 TO SUBDIVIDE A 97.3 ACRE PARCEL INTO 13 PARCELS AND 2 REMAINDER PARCELS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Parcel Map No. 26852 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. {2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: A: PP22~ 15 ..... P~-26852 a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter ~'SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. t2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the foilowl ng: a) There is reasonable probability that Parcel Map No. 26852 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. A: PP22q 16 P~-26852 c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. ~60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of; property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. A: PP221~ 17 PN-26852 (2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: a) The proposed Parcel Map will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. b) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the surrounding proposed development, zoning and SWAP. c) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,due to the fact that the project is consistent with surrounding proposed development. d) The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law due to the fact that the project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. L~60, Schedule E. e) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density due to the fact that the project has access to public roads and sufficient building area. f) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as determined in the initial study. A: PP22q 18 PM-26852 g) The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities due to the fact that the lots are large enough to provide sufficient southern exposure with passive or active solar possibilities. h) All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic, access is provided from Winchester and Margarita Roads. i) j) The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as conditioned. The project will not interfere with any easements. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. A: PP22q 19 PH-26852 SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Parcel Map No. 26852 for the subdivision of a 97.3 acre parcel into 13 parcels located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment 3, attached hereto. SECTION PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of June, 1991 by,the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PP22~ 20 ,~M-26~52 --~ ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No: 26852 Project Description: 14 Lot Commercial Subdivision with 2 Remainders, on 97 acres located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Marqarita Roads. Assessor's Parcel No.: 911 - 180-026 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. e This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance q60. The expiration date is . The subdivlder shall submit one copy of a soils report to the City Engineer and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a City maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Provide reciprocal access, parking, drainage and maintenance agreements between all the parcels through an REA or CC&R's prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney. Document to be recorded with the final map. A: PP22q 21 15. 16. 17. PM-26852 Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontologic resources. A qualified vertebrate paleontologist must be retained to develop a mitigation program prior to issuance of grading permits. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: ae Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. be Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six 16) feet at maturity. Ce All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. de Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. ee Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. fe All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading' contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: --. A: PP22~ 23 e 10. 11. 12. 13. 2M-26852 The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated April 2~, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District~s letter dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance ~60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which is attached. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the C-P-S { Scenic Highway Commercial ) zone. be Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet {ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety Department. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty {30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory." be "A Liquefaction Hazard Report (County Geologic Report No. 793) has been done for this site and is on file in the Planning Department." A: PP22~ 22 18. 19. 20. 21. PM-26852 All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the followin9 conditions shall be satisfied: ae All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. be All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66q99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. A: PP22~ 2~ PH-26852 22. Within forty-eight {48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars {$1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars { $1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4{d){2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar [$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight {48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 7~ 23. Dedicate right-of-way along Winchester Road along remainder parcel. The applicant shall comply with recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated April 23, 1991. 25. A 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 26. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 27. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 28. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district~ City of Temecula Fire Bureau; A: PP224 25 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 35. 36. PM-26852 Planning Department: Engineering Department: Riverside County Health Department: CATV Franchise; CalTrans; and Parks and Recreation Department. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Margarita Road from Highway 79 to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 {86']110'). In the event that Winchester Road {Highway 79) is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18 foot lane per CalTrans Standard {110'] 13q'). The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March lq, prior to occupancy. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66q62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road {Highway 79) and Margarita Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CalTrans. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map. A: PP22q 26 37. 38. RH-26852 Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. A Notice of Intention to form and/or join the Landscape and Lighting District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. 39. Notice of Intention to join the median island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. ae Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, 'curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping {street and parks). d. Sewer and domestic water systems. e. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. t~61 and as approved by the. City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering Department. A: PP22~ 27 ..... PH-26852 ~8. ~9. 50. 51. 52. 53. 55. 56. 57. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer, All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer, A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard ~00 and ~01 [curb sidewalk). The subdivider shall submit two {2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2q" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The subdlvider shall submit two {2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. A: PP22~ 28 PH-26852 58. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainacje flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. ~60 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering Department. 59. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. 60. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. 61. The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. 62. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 63. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer~s Office. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer~s Office. 65. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 66. Prior to any work being performed, an application for a Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. 67. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. A: PP22~ 29 68. 69. 70. ?~-26852 A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Winchester Road (Hiqhway 79) A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 71. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 72. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 73. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. A: PP22~ 30 PM-26852 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 75. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. 76. Asphaltic emulsion {fog seal) shall be applied not less than lt~ days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 9t~ of the State Standard Specifications. Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: .~ A signing and striping plan shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included in the street improve~n~ent plans as determined by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 78. All signing and striping shall be installed and functional per the approved plans and as approved in the field by CalTrans and the City Engineer. A: PP22~ 31 riVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT R~v[RSi~[ C&LIFORNhl a, 2502 April 15, 1991 J.F. DavidSon Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 340 Tamsouls, CA 92390 Attention: David B. Saari Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Hap 2&852 Plot Plan 224 City of Temecula You have sent us material regarding these cases for our "review as a Land Use case and as a land subdivision". We do not make floodproofing recommendations or write flood hazard reports for projects in incorporated cities. But It is appropriate that we comment on Santa Oertrudis Creek Channel since we are involved with the ¢lood control aspects of Assessment District 161. We have recently approved the plans for Santa Gertrudte Creek Channel. The channel will capture and safely convey the 100 year storm runoff in that stream when it hal been constructed in its entirety according to plans, and when surrounding land developments have been brought up to grade as proposed. Zf the project is constructed in stages, as we understand is now being considered, additional study would be necessary to determine its performance. Zt should also be noted that Assessment Oiatrtct 161 has not.yet made application for a Conditional Letter of Nap Ravia¶on (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FENA). Properties within the FEMA mapped floodplain will remain subject to flood insurance requirements until FEMA has issued a letter of Map Revision (LONR), and the District cannot guaranl:~e that FENA will find the proposed improvements acceptable. The Dtetrt¢~ will not accept the Santa Gertrudia Channel for operation and maintenance until it has been completed, all necessary grading adjacent to the channel has been completed, and the improvements have been approval by FEMA. C: City of Temecula Engineering Depar:ment Bedford Properties Attn: Grsg Erickson RANPAC Attn: Chuck Collin$ H. KASHUBA /ienior Civil Engineer JHK:pln April 23, 1991 Ranpa¢ Soils, Inc. 41710 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Christopher Krall Won S. Yoo Subject: Liquefaction Hazard Work Order No. 690-161 Plot Plan 224 A.P.N.: 910-110-029 County Ceologic Report No. 793 City of Temecula Gent lemen: we have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Margarita Meadows Commercial Center, Winchester and Margarita Road, Temecula, CA," dated November 1, 1990. Your report determined that: -- 1. The potential for liquefaction of the subsurface soils at this site during a seismic event is considered to be moderate· The most significant effect of liquefaction at the site WOUld be settlement of the ground surface. Indicated settlement on the order of one inch would be possible on localized areas of the site. Differantis% settlement a% the site from zero to one inch is likely to occur across distances of 300 feet or more. other effects of liquefaction including loss of bearing. capacity, sanG boils and lateral spreading are considered unlikely. Your report recommended that: All foundations shall be constructed entirely in compacted fill. The depth of fill shall extend a minimum of two footing widths beneath the base of the footing withe minimum of 2 feet and maximum of a feet. The area extend five feet' outside the of recompaction shall foundation.per~meter. LEMON $TREST, bTM FLOOR fi=OR!,:" ~/'g733 COUNTRY' 'CLUB' ORiV_Ei ~UITE '' B~RMUDA 'DUNES, CALIFORNIA g221 (r..' ~' .'.~2-82 Of ~wo fee% o~ ~ec~mpacte~ native ~oils and/or fill. Ct'~ntinuou~ f~otinga ~hallbe a minimum 12 inches Wid~ an,.] 1~ in~hom ~elo~ ~owes~ &~Jl~en~ grade. I~-lated £ooting$ ~h&11 bo m min~u~ l~ lnch-~ ~qua~. Allowable Dear.~.g S~a~iO llve 10a~O lS 2000 pSf. A]lowable bearing preocure m~¥ b~ i~oroa~d by 10 per~-nt ~or oauh ~oot d~D~h Up to maximum O~ 3~00 psf. 4e ConeteL. slabs -on- gra¢l~ shall ~av4d a minimum th;ckn¢ss O~ 4 tn¢~hes nominal £or li~h~y 1oa(led floors. compac~:e~ wi~h dxain.,;e devLce~ ~ns~.allc~ In ~:cordanco With Chapter 70 of tb~ latoe~ On] rot~ Suildi.9 ~c and App~Y E oZ' yo~ ,epo~t. It is OUr oplni~n th&~ ~-h~ repor~ was prepaFod in a compo~ent manner and satisfies ~hO a~dlti~nal information requested un~or~h~ Californlm ~tvi~onmon~a% ~,,ality loC ~svi.*w. Final aI,l,roval o~ ~ ~eport iS h,reb~ given. conc%ruetJ. nn of ~e p&o~ct. : ~:: Cl:y of T.m~cula, Planning -'b~eve :iannino Hotgan & wuuanso~ A~uhJ.~ecto Rus-~11 l~nuo£f P~TMENT OF TR~SPORTATION DISTRICT 8,P.O. BOX 231 SAN BE~IHO, ~ 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 PETE WIL$OI~. Gov®rnor Apr11 16, 1991 08-Rlv-79-R2.86/R3.18 Planning Department Attention: Steve Jiannino City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 Your Reference: Plot Plan 224, Parcel MaD 26852, Chanqe of Zone 11 Dear Mr. Jiannino: An Encroachment Permit will be required for the proposed Grading, Signage and Landscaping within the State R/W. In addition, Caltrans' Development Review branch has the following concerns: ~he connection to State Highway 79 (SH 79) called out as a 50' Driveway, approximately 1200 feet southwest of Margarita Road, must be a street connection, not a driveway, as shown oR Permit application 90-1868 and as agreed to in several previous meetings between Caltrans personnel and JF Davidson engineers. Access to the proposed development must be taken off this local street, not off of the State highway. Perhaps the developer might consider a cul-de-sac configuration to accomplish this. The Traffic Study done for Assessment District 161 (widening of Winchester Road) by Kunzman and Associates did not study this intersection to determine the need for signalization. If signals are to be constructed, warrants must be met. The access shown approximately 500 feet southwest of margarita Road is intended to serve the Rancho California Water District property only. It may not be used as an additional access to the proposed development. Also, it must conform to the configuration shown on Permit application 90-1868 (see attached, highlighted mockup of that access point). The Water District access shall be a Caltrans standard N8-A, Case A, type of driveway. Curb returns are not permitted. Details and elevations of the proposed Pylon Signage at the Slte Entry from SH 79 must be submitted a part of the Permit application package. In addition to the above-noted concerns, this office must see the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) Conditions of Approval Grading and drainage Plans (not conceptuals) A copy of any documents providing additional State R/W A copy of the Traffic Study A check print of the Parcel Map (not Tentative Map). The map need not be signed and recorded, but must be stamped with the City's "Stamp of Approval". A check print of any plans for improvements within the State R/W (including Landscaping Plans) If you should have any questions, please call Mr. Ahmad Salah or Mr. Mike Sim at (714) 383-4384. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Tim Chowdhury District Development Review Engineer STATE OF GALIFO~NIA~U$1NE~, TRAN~I~X~TATIC~4 AND ~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 SAN B~RNARDINO, CALIFOIINIA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 March 14, 1991 PETE WILSON, Governor Development Review 08-Riv-79-R3.180 Your Reference: PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 Planning Department City Hall City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 located northwest corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road near Rancho California area. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Calftans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Nahro Saoud- of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. T~ CHOWDHURT ~ Chief, Development Review Branch Art /'?. DATE WE REQUEST THAT THB ZTEH8 CHECKED BELOW BE ZNCLUDED ZN TI!'B CONDZTZON8 OF APPROVAL FOR THT8 PRO,YECT** / // NON~L RIGHT OF HAY DEDICATION TO PROVIDE ~'~' HALF--WIDTH ON THE STATE NIGHgAY, / ~TOPJ4AL STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO PROVIDE .~" HALF--WIDTH Old THE STATE HIGHgAY. C~JRB AND GUTTER, STATE STANDARD /~'/~-'~v TYPE ,~?-c~ ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY. PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALC)NG THE STATE HIGHgAY BY PAINTING THE CURS RED AND/ON BY THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF NO PARKING SIGNS. RADIUS CUR8 RETURNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS WITH THE STATE HIGIMAY. STATE STANDARD WHEELCHAIR RA/4PS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CURB RETURNS. A POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRZER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIHIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHIMY. VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGHgAY. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CONNECTIONS. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STANDARD DRIVEgAYS. VEHICULAR ACCESS SItALL NOT BE J:~:~!D~D WITHIN OF T~ 1~I~ AT ~EHI~LAR ACCESS TO THE ~TATE HIGHLY SHALL BE PR~IDED BY A ~--TYPE ~NECTI~. VEHI~LAR ACCESS ~NECTI~S S~LL K PA~ AT LUST giTgiN THE STATE HIG~Y RIGHT OF ~Y. ACCESS KINTS TO THE STATE HZG~Y S~LL ~ OE~L~ IN A WBER T~T gILL P~IDE SIGHT DIST~ F~ ~H AL~G THE ~TATE HIGHWAY. LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL PROVIDE FON SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE, CCfiPLY WITH FIXED OBJECT SET BACK AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS. A LEFT--TURN LANEv INCLUOING SHOULDERS AND ANY NECESSARY WIDENING; SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE HIGHgAY. A TRAFFIC STI~Y INDICATING ON AND OFF--SITE FLOW PATTERNS AND V~.UHES, PROSABLE IMPACTS AND PROPC~ED MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED. PARKING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT CAUSE ANY VEHICULAR HOVEI4ENT CONFLICTS~, lNCLUOING PARKING STALL ENTRANCE AND EXIT; WITHIN QF THE ENTRANCE FRGN THE STATE HIGHgAY. ~.ARE SHALL BE TAKEN WHEN DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTY TO PRESERVE Aid) PERPETUATE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE STATE HIGHgAY. PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION SItQUID BE GIVEN TO CUI4ULATIVE INCBEABEO STONN RUNOFF TO INSURE THAT A HIGHgAY DRAINAGE PRQSLEH IS NOT CREATED. /PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIONAL COlMINTS. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT. (.~ONSTRUCTIOS/[)ENOLZTICMd WITHIN PRESENT OR PK,~.~ED STATE RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE ( I · E · ASBESTOS; PETROCHENICALS; ETC· ) Aid) NITIGATED AS PER REQtJZRENENTS OF REGULAT~Y AGENCIES . ~THEN PLANS ARE S~JB#ZTTED, PLEASE CQNFORN TO THE REOUIREHENTS OF THE ATTACHED "HANDCXJT#. THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS AND TINE REQUIRED FOR PLAN CHECK. PROVTDE TO APPLTCANT. ALTHOUGH THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DEAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEA~ TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT Old THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEN~ CONSIDERATIOS HUST BE GIVEN TO THE CtJI4JLATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED OEVELOP#ENT IN THIS AREA. ANY HEAS~JRES NECESSARY TO NITIGATE THE CZJHIJLATIVE INPACT OF TRAFFIC AND/QIt DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO OR WITH DEVELOPHINT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THEN. CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISION, OR FUTURE PROVISION, OF S!GNILIZ.4TION AND LIGHTTNG OF THE ZN~CTICN OF AND THE STATE HIGaM%Y LJTT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEN OF THE AREA. ANY NEASURES TO NITIGATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DEAINAGE INPACTS SHALL BE INCLUOED WITH THE DEVELCX)HENT. THIS POd~TION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY IS INCLUOED IN THE CALIFORNIA MASTER ~:h. AN OF STATE HIGIMAYS ]~LIGISLE F~ OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGH!dAY DESIGNATION AND IN THE FUTURE YOUR AGENCY HAY WISH TO HAVE THIS ROUTE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY. THIS PCX~TION OF THE STATE HIGHtdAY HAS SEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGH~AYi AND DEVELOFNENT IN THIS CORRIDOit SHOULD 8E CC~4PATIBLE WITH THE SCENIC HIGHWAY CONCEPT. TT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS CONSIDERABLE PUBLIC CONCERN ASQIJT NOISE LEVELS AOJACENT TO HEAVILY TRAVELLED HIGHWAYS. L4ND OEVELOPHENT; IN ORDER TO BE C~HPATIBLE WITH THIS CONCERN; ~Y RE~IRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTE~AT[~ H~RES. ~L~ENT OF THIS PR~ERTY S~LD INCL~E ANY NECESWY NOI~ ATTE~TI~. CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DEVELOP.EHT REVIEW B~CN P.O. Box 231 SAN B~RNARDINO, CA 92402 A C~Y OF ~Y ~ITI~S OF ~R~AL M t~l~ APPEAL. A C~Y OF ANY ~NTS P~IDING ~ITI~AL STATE H1G~Y RIGHT OF ~Y ~ RE~ATI~ OF THE ~P. ~Y PR~LS TO ~THER DML~ THIS ~RTY. A CCX)Y OF THE TRAFFIC OS ENVIRONHENTAL STYJOY, CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL OR TRACT MAPo CHECK PRINT OF THE PI.ANS FOR ANY II4PROV~NTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE STATE N!~Y RIGHT OF ~Y. CHECK PRINT. OF THE ~ING ~ ~I~M ~S F~ THIS ~RTY ~EN AVAi~LE. Date: March 13, 1991 Riv-79-R3.180 (Co-Rte-PM) PP 224/ PM 26852 / CZ 11 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: We need cross-sections at 50 ft intervals, from 100 ft each side of the project limits, within state Right-Of-Way (R/W). The cross- sections must conform to the requirements of the attached "HANDOUT". The Caltrans Right-Of-Way (R/W) line must be shown and labeled on the next submittal. The driveways connections should be compatible with the existing and future road system of the area. The centerline of proposed driveway shown approximately 520 ft southwesterly of Margarita Road must be located and constructed as shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868, SHEET NO 5. The Rancho California water district property shall not have a separate access to state highway· Show the existing state stationing along the highway centerline according to the stations shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868. The Right-OF-Way in the Vicinity of Rancho California water district property does not agree with our record. The proposed driveway shown northwest of Winchester Road (HWY 79) must accommodate the DETECTOR SETBACK requirements (See attached sheet). State law requires Outdoor Advertising clearance for signs proposed adjacent to interstate and primary highways. Clearance must be obtained form: Highway Outdoor Advertising Branch California Department of Transportation 1120 N street Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 445-3337 N~r'~ 7~F9 0 VERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPA.RTMENT ER~'DE ..~',.,,.~ 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657-3183 GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF March 7, 1991 TO: ATTN: RE: City of Temecula Planning Department CZ 11 & PM 26852 The Riverside County Fire Department has no comments regarding the above referenced projects. All fire protection requirements will be addressed on related Plot Plan 224. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist LC/tm ~ INDIO OFFICE Country Club Drive, Suite F, lndio, C~ 92201 (619) 342-8~6 · FAX (619} 775-2072 PLANNING DIVISION ~ !UVERSID£ OFFICE 3760 12th Sm~ Rivenld~ CA 92~01 (714) 275.4777 * FAX (714) ~69.7451 ~ TEMECULA OFFICE 41002 CountT Centre. Drive, Suke 225, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-5070 · FAX (714) 694-5076 ~ l~inted on recycl~cl p~p4~ Uoun y r versme DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO: CITY OF TEMECULA FIlIM: "~ " DE: PAPECL '~A,F' :'fO. DATE: 04-24-'-) I The Envzranmental Health Services Division has revlewed ~he Parcel HaD No. 26~$2 for this prosect and letter ~s filed. The requirements for a :5AN ~3 letter A sat2sfa,:toTv so~ls Derco!at~on test to A clearance letter frcm the amprour~ate Co[lforn=a ~e,ulonal Water Oua!itv Control Bo~rd. NOTE: For projects w~thln the San D~eco Water Quality Control Board ~Dhere of ~nfluence, a written clearance shai[ be required p. ri.~.~. to ~suance of a :5AN 53. ~. 'two coD~es of the Parcel Map. A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agenc~e~ servln~ potable water. Should the pro3ect be served san2tary sewer services, this Department would need only: A "w~ll-serve" letter from the agency/agencies serv2n9 Dotable water and san2tar¥ ~ewers. One copy of the tentatzve map. [f the ~ro.~ect is to be served water by existing wells, mumps and water tanks, a water supply permit will be fequ~red ~contact the EHSD, Engineering Section at 275- ~9~0). The reoulrements for a water supply permit a~ follows: OC~I.G~.OOO (REV. 11~ll !3', tv ,.-~f Temecuia ATTN: Steve .31.~onn 1 no Aprll 24. Drove the wate~ potable. A tompie e set of plans ~how~ng all Je%a~is of the proposed and existing water systems: s~zes and types of u~pe and calculations ~how~ng that adequa-te cuantltv and pressure can be maintained ¢Cal~forn~a Waterworks Standards - Cal%forn~a Health and Safety Code and Cal~fornla adm~n~st~atlve Code. T~' [e ~u). The~e Dlan~ must be s~gned by a re~l~tered cIv1c engineer. SM:dr May 6, 1991 BCI General Contractors attn: Rick Finken 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 9~390 Temecula, CA ~ ~ re: PALEONTOLOGIC ASSESSMENT. PARCEL MAP # 21361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY DR. ALLAN D. GRIESEMER Director Dear Mr. Finken, At your request, the San Bernardino County Musenm~ has conducted a paleontologic assessment, including a search of pertinent geologic literature, a review of the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory, and a field survey for parcel # 21361, a 29- acre parcel in Rancho California, Riverside County. The parcel is on the northwest side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Franklin Avenue. Specifically, the parcel is within Township 7 South and Range 3 West and if projected, falls within the southeast quarter of section 21, as shown on the Murrieta, CA 7.5 minute USG$ topographic quadrangle map. Background Previous geologic mapping by Mann (1955) and Kennedy (1977) indicate that the parcel is located on recent alluvitm~ and on or ']lear the Pauba Formation. These authors report fossil Pleistocene horse. The Pauba Formation overlies the Bi:.~hop Ash and thus is less than 700,000 years BP. Review of the Legional Paleontologic Locality Inventory at the San Bernardino C'ounty Museum does not indicate that previous paleontologic resource a~sessment:~ ]lave been conducted for the Temecula parcel and that no paleontologic localities are recorded within one mile of the parcel. However, more than 200 paleontologic resource localities are known from the Pauba Formation in the Murrieta-Temecula area. The Pauba Formation unconformably overlies the Unnamed Sandstone. The faunal assemblage from the Pauba Formation in the Temecula- Murrieta area, stm~narized below, suggests a late Irvingtonian/early Rancholabrean LMA in contrast to the early- late Irvingtonian fauna from the Unnamed Sandstone in the California Oaks area (Reynolds and Reynolds, 1990). imperial memm~oth mastodon large camel llama pronghorn deer large horse small horde Jack rabbit. cottontail shrew squirrel k~ngaroo rat pocket gopher wood rat vole king snake rattlesnake pond turtle toad chub fish land ~nail Methods The field assessment was conducted on May 3, 1991, by Quintin La].:e, Muse~m~ Tech I I of the San Bernardino County Museum. He ]]as ha,:! previous experience in paleontologic resource assessments and salvage in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Parcel # 21361 was inspected by foot traverses at appro:.:imatel¥ 30 meter intervals. Recent alluvitm~ was verified to occur on the parcel in association with the Santa Gertrudis stream bed as was the presence of coarse to mediums-grained sands interpreted to · represent the Pauba Formation. Results and Recommendations Available geologic literature describes the Pauba Formation as fossiliferous. Resource localities in the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory indicate that the Pauba Formation is very fossiliferous in the Murrieta-Temecula area. Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontoloiic resources on the Temecula parcel. The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to ~develop a program of mitigation for the parcel which will conform to the guidelines of CEQA and Riverside County. The impact mitigation program must include, but not be limited to: 1. Monitoring of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontologic resources by a qualified paleontologic monitor. The monitor should be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments which are likely to contain the remains of small fossil mammals. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert e~ipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. The most cost-efficient method of salvage of small fossils is to remove sediments containinE the fossils to stockpiles offsite. The fossils can be removed by screen washing elsewhere while excavation continues on site. 2. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification, including washing of sediments to recover small vertebrates. This will allow the fossils to be described in a report of findings and reduces the volume of matrix around specimens being stored. 3. Identification and curation of specimens into an established museum repository with retrievable storage. ~.. Preparation of a report of findings with all appended itemized inventory of .~pecimens. The report and inventory, when submitted to the appropriate Lead Agency, signifies completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic resources. References cited Kennedy, M.P. , 1977. Elsinore fault zone in southern Riverside County, California. California Division of MJ. nes and Geology Special Report 131: 12 p. Mann, J.F., 1955. Geology of a portion of the Elsinore fault zone, California. California Division of Mines Special Report ~3: 22 p. Reynolds, R.E. and R.L. Reynolds, 1990. Irvingtonian? faunas from the Pauba Formation, Temecula, Riverside County, California, in Abstracts of Proceedings, 1990 Mojave Desert. Quaternary Research Sympositm]. Redlands, San Bernardino ~ounty Muse%m% Association Quarterly, 37('2):37. Kathleen Springer~ Project Manager Earth Sciences Recency and character of faulting along the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM 024 Orange Treei~rl~ .6R, edt~A 923740 1714) 798-8570 · 422-1610 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN{ GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY DR. ALLAN D. GRIESEMER INVOICE: ~050.0506.1 To: BCI General Contractors attn: Rick Finken, Project Manager 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92390 For: PALEONTOLOGIC RECORDS SEARCH, PARCEL 21361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Regional PaleontoloEic Locality Inventory access fee and first hour: Field survey, 3 hrs @ $32./hr Mileage, 115 mi @ .38/h~ Report, 3 hrs @ $32./hr TOTAL $50.00 96.00 ~3.70 96.00 $285.70 ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 91- PP-22~ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLOT PLAN NO. 224 TO CONSTRUCT 1[~9,500 SQUARE FEET COMMERCIAL CENTER ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 24 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Plot Plan No. 224 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findin.qs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: A: PP22~ 32 PP-22~ There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: {1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. {2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 22q proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. A: PP22q 33 c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. {1) Pursuant to Section 18.30{c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. [ 2 ) The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 22q will be consistent with the City~s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The project, as proposed, conforms with existing applicable city zoning and development ordinances. Further, the proposal is characteristic of similar development approved by the City to date. b) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City~s future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project is of insignificant scale in context of the broad goals and directives anticipated in the City's General Plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 3~8, ~60; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 [Planning and Zoning Law). A: PP22q. d) e) f) g) h) PP-22~ The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking, and landscaping are provided; as well as sufficient area to appropriately construct the proposed structure, reference proposed Plot Plan No. 22q, Exhibit E of the Staff Report. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare: nor will it adversely impact the built or natural environment as determined in the Initial Environmental Assessment of this proposal. Reference the attached project Conditions of Approval and Initial Environmental Study. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a.significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations, and reflects design aspects currently existing in the proposal's general vicinity. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project sirens primary frontage is on Winchester Road, a dedicated CalTrans right-of-way. Improvement of the abutting roadways shall be as per the City Engineering Department and CalTrans. The design of the project together with the type of supporting improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through, or use of the property within the proposed project. None are exhibited on the underlying parcel map, nor are easements evident on deedis) describing the property in question. A: PP22~ 35 PP-22~ · That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Supporting documentation is attached. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Plot Plan No. 22~ to construct a ltt9,500 square feet commercial center located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment 5, attached hereto. SECTION PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHA I RMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of June, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PP22~ 36 CZ-I1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof. held on the 17th day of June, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A:PP22~ 1~ ?~-26852 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 26852 TO SUBDIVIDE A 97.3 ACRE PARCEL INTO 13 PARCELS AND 2 REMAINDER PARCELS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROADS. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Parcel Map No. 26852 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty 130) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: A: PP22~ 15 ...... PH-26852 a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: I1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Parcel Map No. 26852 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. A: PP22q. 16 PH-26852 c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: a) That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of; property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. A: PP22q 17 PH-26852 (2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: a) The proposed Parcel Map will not have significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study performed for the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. b) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the surrounding proposed development, zoning and SWAP. c) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,due to the fact that the project is consistent with surrounding proposed development. d) The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning law due to the fact that the project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance No. ~60, Schedule E. e) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density due to the fact that the project has access to public roads and sufficient building area. f) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as determined in the initial study. A: PP22q 18 P1~-26852 g) The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities due to the fact that the lots are large enough to provide sufficient southern exposure with passive or active solar possibilities. h) All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic, access is provided from Winchester and Margarita Roads. i) The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as conditioned. The project will not interfere with any easements. j) The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION 2. Environmental Coml~liance. An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. A: PP22~ 19 P~-26852 SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Parcel Map No. 26852 for the subdivision of a 97.3 acre parcel into 13 parcels located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment 3, attached hereto. SECTION 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of June, 1991 bythe following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PP22q 20 PN-26852 ~. ATTACHMENT :3 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No: 26852 Project Description: 1~ Lot Commercial Subdivision with 2 Remainders, on 97 acres located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Mar.qarita Roads. Assessor's Parcel No.: 911-180-026 Planninq Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is . The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the City Engineer and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Legal access as required by Ordinance ~60 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a City maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Provide reciprocal access, parking, drainage and maintenance agreements between all the parcels through an REA or CCSR's prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney. Document to be recorded with the final map. A: PP22Zl. 21 15. 16. 17. P~-26852 Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontologic resources. A qualified vertebrate paleontologist must be retained to develop a mitigation program prior to issuance of grading permits. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six {6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. de Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shalt be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading' contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: ---- A: PP22L~ 23 e 10. 11. 12. 13. ?~-26852 The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated April 2~, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached, If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10,25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance ~60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits, The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which is attached, All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan, Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the C-P-S I Scenic Highway Commercial ) zone. be Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet IECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety Department. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty {30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory." be "A Liquefaction Hazard Report {County Geologic Report No. 793) has been done for this site and is on file in the Planning Department." A: PP22~ 22 18. 19. 20. 21. PM-26852 All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. be Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: ae All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. A: PP22~ 2~ PM-26852 22. Within forty-eight {48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars I $1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4{d){2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar {$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 1S075. If within such forty-eight {48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4ic). 23. Dedicate right-of-way along Winchester Road along remainder parcel. The applicant shall comply with recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated April 23, 1991. 25. A 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 26. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 27. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 28. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; A: PP224 25 .... 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 35. 36. PM-26852 Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; CelTtans; and Parks and Recreation Department. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Margarita Road from Highway 79 to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 {86'i110'). In the event that Winchester Road {Highway 79) is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18 foot lane per CalTrans Standard {110'! 13~'). The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March 1~, prior to occupancy. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66~62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road {Highway 79) and Margarita Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CaiTrans. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map. A: PP22LI. 26 37. 38. PH-26852 Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. A Notice of Intention to form and/or join the Landscape and Lighting District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. 39. Notice of Intention to join the median island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping {street and parks). d. Sewer and domestic water systems. e. All trails, as required by the City~s Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the. City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering Department. A: PP22~ 27 .... PH-26852 fl.8. ~,9. $0. 51. 52. 53. 55. 56. 57. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard q00 and ~01 (curb sidewalk). The subdivider shall submit two {2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The subdivider shall submit two 12) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shal! address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. A: PP22~ 28 PH-26852 58. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering Department. 59. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. 60. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone "A~, which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. 61. The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. 62. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 63. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. 65. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 66. Prior to any work being performed, an application for a Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. 67. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. A: PP22~ 29 PM-26852 68. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Winchester Road {Hiqhway 79) 69. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 70. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 71. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 72. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 73. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated i assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. A: PP22~ 30 PH-26852 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 75. Existin9 city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. 76. Asphaltic emulsion {fog seal) shall be applied not less than 1~ days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 9t~ of the State Standard Specifications. Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: A signing and striping plan shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included in the street improve.n~ent plans as determined by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO ISS~/~NCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 78. All signing and striping shall be installed and functional per the approved plans and as approved in the field by CatTrans and the City Engineer. A: PP22a 31 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT April 15, 1991 Im O BOX FAX NO t?t4~ J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 340 Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: David B. Saari Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Map 26852 Plot Plan 224 City of Tamecula You have sent us material regarding these case, for our 'review as a Land Use case and as a land subdivision". We do not m~ke floodproofing recommen~a=ions or write flood hazard reports for projects in incorporated cities. But it is aDpropriate that we comment on Santa Gertrudts Creek Channel since we are involved with the flood control aspects of Assessment Oistrtct 161. We have recently approved the plans for Santa $ertrudie Creek Channel. The channel will capture and safely convey the 100 year storm runoff in that stream when it has been constructed in its entirety according to plans, and when surrounding land developments have been brought up to grade &, proposed. If the project is constructed in stages, as we under,tend is now being considered, additional study would be necessary to determine its performance. Zt should also be noted that Assessment District 161 has not-yet made application for a Conditional Le~tar of HaD Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Properties within the F£MA mapped floodplain will remain cubjeer to flood insurance requirements until FEMA has issued & letter of Map Revision (LOMR), and the Otstrtc[ cannot guarantee that FENA will find the proposed improvements acceptable. The District will not accept the Sanibm Gertrudte Channel for operation and maintenance until it has been completed, all necessary grading adjacent to [he channel has been completed, and the imprQvemente have been approval by FEMA. C: City of Temecula Engineering Department Bedford Properties Attn: Grog Erickson RANPAC Attn: Chuck Collins H. KASHUBA enior Clvil Engineer JHK:Dln April 23, 1991 Ranpat Soils, Inc. 41710 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Christopher Krall Won S. Yoo subject: Gent leman: Liquefaction Hazard Work Order No. 690-161 Plot Plan 224 A.P.N.: 910-110-029 County Geologic Report No. 793 City of Temecula We hawe reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Margarita Meadows Commercial Center, Winchester and Margarita Road, Temecula, CA," dated November 1, 1990. Your report determined that: The potential for liquefaction of the subsurface soils at this site during a seismic event is considered to be moderate. The most significant effect of liquefaction at the site would be settlement of the ground surface. Indicated settlement on the order of one inch would be possible on localized areas of the site. Differential settlement at the site from zero to one inch is likely to occur across distances of 300 fee~ or more. 3; O~her effects of liquefaction including loss of bearing capacity, sand boils and lateral spreading are considered' unlikely. Your report recommended that: of recompaction shall foundation.per,meter. All foundations shall be constructed entirely in compacted fill. The depth of fill shall extend a minimum of two footing widths beneath the base of the footing withe minimum of 2 feet and maximum of 8 feet. The area extend five fee~' outside the '40R'7, LEMON STREET, '9TH FLOOR 11=OR!';' ~' ~J'/33 COUNTRY' 'CLUB' DRIVE; ~uITE BERMUDA 'DUNES, CALIFORNIA g221 (6' "" .~2-82 ...... PP-22~ ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No: 22q Project Description: Retail Center of approximately 150,000 square feet. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-110-029 and 910-180-019 Planninq Department The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for 3 buildings for 115,280 square feet; 23,916 square feet; and 10,500 square feet. e The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan No. 22[t. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. e This approval shall be used within two {2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two {2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on . The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 224 marked Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department"s Conditions of Approval which are included herein. A: PP22~ 37 e 10. 11. 12. 13. PP-22~ Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated March 11, 1991. a copy of which is attached. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District~s transmittal dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden~s transmittal dated April 23, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County Geologist's transmittal dated April 23, 1991, a copy of which is attached. Prior to the issuance of building permits, three ~3) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department of approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Landscape plans shall conform to conceptual landscape plans marked Exhibit G. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten 110) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty 130) inches. A minimum of 7it9 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3~8. 7it9 parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit E. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class I I base or as may be recommended by a qualified Soils Engineer. A minimum of 9 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit E. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed raflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, A: PP22~ 38 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. PP-22~ or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone ." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Planning Department Engineering Department Environmental Health Rancho Water District CalTrans School District Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Eastern Municipal Water District A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit F. Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit F I Color Elevations). Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. All street lights and other outdoor Ughting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. A: PP22q 39 23. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. PP-22~ This project is located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for liquefaction or subsidence. Where hazard of liquefaction or subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) (the number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one- half 11/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 23 Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. The area does not have to be enclosed. Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Within forty-eight It~8) hours of the approval of the project, the applicantJdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars {$1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars {$1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~{d){2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar {$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight {t~8) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department A: PP22~ ~0 PP-22~ the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~{c). 31. A minimum of seven {7) loading spaces shall be provided as shown on approved Exhibit E. 32. A plot plan application must be processed for any approvals for any additional buildings other than the three approved by this plot plan. 33. Dedicate a 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement along Winchester Road prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. Engineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 35. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau: Planning Department: Engineering Department: Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise: CalTrans: and Parks and Recreation Department. 36. The developer shall submit two {2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2t~"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. A: PP22t~ 37. 38. 39. PP-22~ The developer shall submit two {2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. Prior to any work being performed, an application for Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this Ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer and all appropriate agencies. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans. Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer and all appropriate agencies shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities within the right-of-way. Prior to any work being performed on the private parking areas or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer~s Office. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way. Winchester Road {Hiqhway 79) A: PP22~ 42 50. 51. 52. 53. 55. 56. 57. PP-22~ The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. ae Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping {street and parks). d. Sewer and domestic water systems. e. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Riverside County Flood Control District to outlet storm flows directly into the flood control channel. A drainage stud.y.. s. hall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage faciht~es shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted through the undersidewalk drains. A: PP22q. LI.3 58. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone ~'A'~, which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: 59. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 60. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 61. If deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be recorded. 62. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road {Highway 79) and Margarita Road with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CelTtans. 63. In the event that Winchester Road {Highway 79) is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18-foot lane per CalTrans Standards { 110~/13~~). The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March 1~, prior to occupancy. Margarita Road from Winchester Road {Highway 79) to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right- of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 {86'1110~). 65. Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City"s C.A.T.V. Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V. Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. 66. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing A: PP22~ this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 67. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. 68. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 69. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer, and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard 400 and 401 {curb sidewalk). 70. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City Engineer. 71. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. 400 and 401. 72. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. 73. This minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. 75. Construct all street improvements including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 76. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the A: PP224 45 PP-22~ developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66q62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. 77. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 78. A signing and striping plan shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans as determined by the City Engineer. 79. Plans for a traffic signal shall be under design by a registered Civil Engineer for approval by CalTrans and the City Engineer for the intersection of Winchester Road I Highway 79) and Margarita Road and shall be included for reference with the second plan check submittal of the street improvement plans. 80. Plans for a traffic signal shall be under design by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by CelTtans and the City Engineer for the intersection of Winchester Road {Highway 79) and the approved entry point, and shall be included for reference with the second plan check submittal of the street improvement plans. 81. Traffic signal interconnect shall be under design by a Registered Civil Engineer to show 1 1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and ~3 pull boxes on 200 foot centers along the property fronting Winchester Road { Highway 79). This design shall be shown on the traffic signal plans and must be approved by CalTrans and the City Engineer. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 82. All signing and striping shall be installed and functional per the approved plans and as approved in the field by CalTrans and the City Engineer. 83. The traffic signal for the intersection of Winchester Road { Highway 79) at the approved access point shall be operational and complete per the approved plans. The traffic signal interconnect shall be installed in place per the approved plans. A: PP22~ ~6 TO: FROM: liE: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA ATTN: Steve Jiannino · A,~~ MARIN ,~~-~nvironmental FLOT PLAN NO. 224 OATE: 03-11-91 Health Specialist IV The Environmental Health Service~ has reviewed Plot Plan No. 224 and has no ob.jections. Sanitary sewer and water services should be available in this area· Prior to any building plan submittals, the following items will be required: "Will-serve" letters from the appropr2ate water and sewer2ng agencies. Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted. including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance wlth the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference. please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (714) 358-5172). A c~a£.~.~...c~.__.Lp_%k..9~ from the Hazardous Materials Management Branch Services (Jon Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: a. Underground storage tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185). d. Waste reduction Management. SM:dr cc: Jon Mohoroski, Hazardous Materials Branch RIVERSIDE COUNTY OLiN ~. NEWMAN C~.T, OF TE~EgL'LA PLOT PLAN 224 ~lc~ pla~, ~he Fire Depar:~e~ recc~en~ ~e ~0!1owin~ £ire pro~ection measures be p~ovide~ l~ accordance ~iC~ ~£vereide County Ordinances and/o~ :ecosnize~ ~ira pro~ecclon ~C~ards: 1. The ~ire Department z; :squired to se~ s m~tnimum fire flow the remodel or ooze:ruction of all cemastoas! ~ui~din§s using the procedure established in Ordinance 525, Provxde or show ~here exists a wl~er e~s~e..~ c~pabie o~ ~ellverin~ ~000 ~.~ for a ~ hou~ d~ration a~ 20 ;~ residual operatin~ pressure, which mus~ Be AvaiLs~le be£cre amy ccm~,u~ibla ma~er£al is p~Aced on ~he Job ~ite, , Zoops~ sy, tem (6"x~"2~x2½)o vial be loca~e~ not lees than 2~ feet or r~rs ~h&n 165 [eec ~rcm any po~n o~ the building as naAsured al~u~ ap;zcve& vehicular ~reve!vAye. T~.e zecuire~ ~re fl.ow shall be available fro~ any sJJace~C hydrant(s) in the sysCs~. &. T~e ~squired ~re ~lowmaM be adJus~e~ a~ a la~er point in process ~o re, lace ~hangse in degass, construction ~¥pe, area eepars~Iou or buAZt-iu ~ire protectlos measures. ~. Applicant/aevelo~er ahal~ ~urnish one co~¥ of the tAe Fire Departmane for review. Plane shall con~or~ ~o the fire hydrant ~Tpea, Iocat£ou am~ spacing, and, ~ha system s~a~L zeeC Ch~ ~ire ~1ow raqui~eute. ~la~e ehaX1 ~a ai~ued/appzcved by a regiate~ed civil aa~i~ee= amd the 13cal wacer company ~h the [o[!o~ ce~iflca~ioa: "l oezci~7 cha~ c~a deei~ o~ the wa~ir nya~em is in accor~ anco e~a r~q~re~n~a ~reecri~eg by ~h~ ~verei~a Cauz~y ?ire ~e ~ar~men~." I~A~ING DIVI~10~ (714) ~-~T?,' · PAX (?!4) ~(~.?4.q, ~.TM. CULA ~'/~tCl~ 41002 Ceufiey C4ui~ DHve, SuM Z2~: Ternsub, CA 92~0 (?t4) 694.S07~, £AX (714~ 6~4-S076 buiLders(a). A s~atemen~ :~a~ ~hs building(i) will ~e autom~.tically ~i~e sp~inkLe~e~ mue~ ~e inclu~a~ on ~be ~ltle pa~e c~ ~he buil~£n~ · ~s~ be eubmit:e~ co the FL~e Deparc~,e~t f~r ap?rova~ pri~: tc mus~ appce~ o~ cbe t~tle pa~e o~ ~he buildi~G plans. Occupancy aepa~atio~ will ~e ~equired as per the section ~0~, 10, 13. Prior :o the issuance o~ ~ulldl~ ~e.'~ict, the applicant/developer be responsible to lUbmi~ s chick or money order In the amount ~0 the ~iverlide ~oun~y Fire Dep~rcman~ ~o~ pla~ check fees. Prior Co Ohs illu&nce o~ butldlz~ ~e~m~e, the develope~ shall deposit, v~th ~aa City ¢~ Tamsouls, a check or mc~sy o~dez equaling L-he sum o~ 25c per ~quara fcc~ ae mi~!p~iem fo~ ~re pro,,crOon tmpaccs. T~.ie a.~cunc ~ua~ be subm~:ca~ separately ~rom c~e plan cbec~ rsvlew ~ees. ~£na! condi~lc~l ~ill be ad~reeee~ vhe~ b~lldtc~ pla~s are revlewe~ in ~he ~uil~izE aa~ Sa~ee~ O~ice. All quss:~ons gesazdin$ the ~ean!n$ of ccndttioua shall be referred ~o Ch~s[ Fire Deper~men~ Planner Laura Cabzal, Fi~e $afe~y Spsclalis~ LC/~m RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT la~v~laS~.~[ CAL;~OI~N~A 12502 April 15, 1991 'J.F. Oavt~son Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 340 Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: David B, Saari Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Map 26852 Plot Plan 224 City Of Temecula You have sent us material regarding these cases for our "review as a Land Use case and as a land subdivision". ~e do not make floodproofing recommendations or write flood hazard reports for projects in incorporated c~ties. But it t$ appropriate that we comment on Santa Ger:rudis Creek Channel since we are involved with :he flood control aspects of Assessment District 161. We have recently approved the plans for Santa Ger%rudts Creek Channel. The channel will capture and safely convey %he 100 year storm runoff in that stream when it ham been constructed in its entirety according to plans, and when surrounding land developments have been brought up to grade as proposed. If the project 15 constructed in stages, as we undere:&nd te now being considered, additional study would be necessary 5o determine its performance. It should also be noted that Assessment District 161 has not yet made application for a Conditional Letter of Ma~ Revision (CLONR) frO~ the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FENA). Properties within the FENA mapped floodplain will remain aub~ect [o flood insurance requirements until FEMA has issued & latter of Map Revision (LOHR), and the Otmtrict cannot guarantee :ha: FENA will find the proposed improvements acceptable. The Otstrtc[ will not accept the $anl~a ~ertrudie Channel for opera:ton and laa~n[enance unt~l it has been co~leted~ all necessary grading adjacent %o the channel has been completed, approval by FEMA. C: City of Temecula Engineering Department Bedford Properties Attn: ~reg Erickson RANPAC Attn: Chuck Collins end the improvement6 have been H. KASHUBA ' ~anior Ctvil Engineer JHK:pln April 2~, i991 Ranpa¢ Soils, Inc. 41710 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Christopher Krall Won S. Subject: Liquefaction Hazard Work Order No. 690-161 Plot Plan 224 A.P.N.: 910-110-029 County Ceologic Report No. 793 City of Temecula Gent lemen: We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Margarita Meadows Commercial Center, Winchester and Margarita Road, Temecula, CA," dated November 1, 1990. Your report determined that: 1. The potential for liquefaction of the subsurface soils at this site during a seismic event is considered to be moderate. The most significant effect of liquefaction at the site would be settlement of the ground surface. Indicated settlement on the order of one inch would be Dossible on localized areas of the site. Differential settlement at the site from zero to one inch is likely to occur across distances of 300 feet or more. Other effects of liquefaction including loss of bearing capacity, sandboils and lateral Gpreading are considered' unlikely. Your report recommended that: STREET, FLOOR 1t:OR~"t 92: ' All foundations shall be constructed entirely in compacted fill. The depth of fill shall extend a minimum of two footing widths beneath the base of the footing witha minimum of 2 feet and maximum of 8 feet. The area of recompaction shall extend five feet' outside the foundation.per~meter. ¥9733 COUNTRY' CLUB' DRIVEl ~U~[ BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92: ~ ~nimum of two feat o~ ~ec~mpa~ted native ~oils and/or cc.,,~pacted fill. ~ inchel ~1o~ %owe~ adjacent. gra~S. Xsc~lated ~ootin,~ preocure m'~ be l~croa~ ~ 10 per,~-nt ~or Concre~ ~lahs -o~- grade shall haw~ a minimum ~h;ckncss OZ ~ tn,:ltes nominml for %igh~y lea,led compac,:e~ with ~ain-ge devices u~st. allc~ In ~:cordanco wi~h Ct,a~er 70 o~ tb~ lato~ unj ~o~ Bulldl.g ~odc and ZL is our oFin~..n ~aC ~e report ~a~ prepared ~n a CO~poCent manner and sat ] ~fies the addit ~ ena i inform. tion rcque~ California ~w{co~cn~a% q,,ality RoE revi~. Final al~Ut*ovaA o~ pepoft 1s h.re~ given. In I.he ~cclgn ~d conc~ructJ. nn of ~he p&o~ct. : ~:: City of Te.ecula, Planning -'b!evo 3iannino ).TEATIr QF CALIFORI;I_/'. - JIU$IN£$$,. TP,.AN.';.,~O~:n~ATIOI,~ AN[' MOOSIN,3 A(3:wNC~' PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8,P.O. BOX 231 SAN ~IRRARDINO, CA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 April 16, 1991 08-Riv-79-R2.86/R3.18 Planning Department Attention: Steve Jiannino City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 Your Reference: Plot Plan 224, Parcel MaD 26852, Chanqe of Zone 11 Dear Mr. Jiannino: An Encroachment Permit will be required for the proposed Grading, Signage and Landscaping within the State R/W. In addition, Caltrans' Development Review branch has the following concerns: ~he connection to State Highway 79 (SH 79) called out as a 50' Driveway, approximately 1200 feet southwest of Margarita Road, must be a street connection, not a driveway, as shown on Permit application 90-1868 and as agreed to in several previous meetings between Caltrans personnel and JF Davidson engineers. Access to the proposed development must be taken off this local street, not off of the State highway. Perhaps the developer might consider a cul-de-sac configuration to accomplish this. The Traffic Study done for Assessment District 161 (widening of Winchester Road) by Kunzman and Associates did not study this intersection to determine the need for signalization. If signals are to be constructed, warrants must be met. The access shown approximately 500 feet southwest of margarita Road is intended to serve the Rancho California Water District property only. It may not be used as an additional access to the proposed development· Also, it must conform to the configuration shown on Permit application 90-1868 (see attached, highlighted mockup of that access point). The Water District access shall be a Caltrans standard N8-A, Case A, type of driveway. Curb returns are not permitted. Details and elevations of the proposed Pylon Signage at the Slte Entry from SH 79 must be submitted a part of the Permit application package. In addition to the above-noted concerns, this office must see the following: a) b) c) d) e) f) Conditions of Approval Grading and drainage Plans (not conceptuals) A copy of any documents providing additional State R/W A copy of the Traffic Study A check print of the Parcel Map (not Tentative Map). The map need not be signed and recorded, but must be stamped with the City's "Stamp of Approval". A check print of any plans for improvements within the State R/W (including Landscaping Plans) If you should have any questions, please call Mr. Ahmad Salah or Mr. Mike Sim at (714) 383-4384. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Tim Chowdhury District Development Review Engineer STATE Of: CALIr-C~NIA--.BUSII~SS, TRANSPOITATION AND HO4JSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8. II.O. BOX 231 SAN B~RNARDINO, CALIFOINIA 92402 TDD (714) 313-4609 March 14, 1991 PETE WILSON, Governor Development Review 08-Riv-79-R3.180 Your Reference: PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 Planning Department City Hall City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed PP 224/PM 26852/CZ 11 located northwest corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road near Rancho Calif.ornia area. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. I'f any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Nahro Saoud of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Chief, Development Review Branch Art DATE RTE ..... WE REQUEST THAT THE ZTEHS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THB CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: // N~L RIGHT OF ~Y DEDICATION TO PR~IDE ~'7 .ALF-MIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHMY. / NON~t STR~T I#PROVEMEHTS TO PROVIDE .~'~ HALF--MIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHMAY. C~.JRB AND GLITTER, STATE STANDARD ~'/'~'~--~, TYPE /c~___~ ALDNG THE STATE HIGHMAY. PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE STATE HIGHVAT BY PAINTING THE CURl RED AND/ON BY THE PROPER PLACEMEHT OF NO PARKING SIGNS. RADIUS CURB RETURNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS MITH THE STATE HIGN~IAY . STATE STANDARD WHEELCHAIR RWqPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CURB RETURNS. A POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHMAY, VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGHWAY. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHMAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CONNECTIONS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHVAT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STANDARD DRIVEWAYS, VEHICUI.4R ACCESS SI~I~L NOT BE PROVII~D ~ITHIN OF THE INTERACTION AT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHMAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A I~--TYPE CONNECTION. VEHICULAR ACCESS CONNECTIONS SHALL M PAVEO AT LEAST HITHIM THE STATE HIGIFI~Y RIGHT OF 14AT. JACCESS PC)INTS TO THE STATE NIGIFIMY SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A IMNNER THAT MILL PROVIOE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR ~' MPN ALONG THE STATE NIGHMAY. ~ANDSCARING ALONG THE STATE HIGI~dAY SHALL PROVIDE FOB SAFE SIGHT OISTANCE; COIdlpLY MITN FIXED OBJECT SET EACK AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS, LEFT--TURN LANEv INCLUDING SHOJLDERS AND ANY NECESSARY ~IDEN!#Gv SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE HIGHgAY. A TRAFFIC STL~Y INDICATING ON AND OFF-SITE FLON PATTERNS AND VOLUHESv PROIASLE I#PACTS ANO PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED, PARKING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A NANHER THAT ~ILL NOT CAUSE ANY VEHICULAR NQVE!4ENT CONFLICTSv INCLUDING PARKING STALL ENTRANCE AND EXIT 1 ~iTHIN OF THE ENTRANCE FROM TIlE STATE #IGHIdAY . CARE SHALL BE TAKEN blHE. DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTY TO PRESERVE RNO PERPETUATE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE STATE HIGHVAT o PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO ClJ4ULATIVE INCREASED STON# RUNOFF TO INSURE THAT A HIGHLY DRAINAGE PROBLEH IS NOT CREATED. //PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIONAL CONHENTS. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT, .... CONSTRUCTZON/DENOLZTZON WiTHiN PRESENT OR PROPOSED STATE RIGHT OF bay SHOULD BE iNVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS t~ASTE ( I · E · ASBESTOS; PETROCHENICALS, ETC. ) AND NITIGATED AS PER REQUIRERENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. WHEN PLANS ARE SUBI4ITTED, PLEASE CONFORH TO THE REQUIREHINTS OF THE ATTACHED "HANDOUT fl. THIS MILL EXPEDITE THE-REVIEV PROCESS AND TIRE REQUIRED FOR PLAN CHECK. PROYTOI~. TO `APPT.ICANT. ,ALTHOUGH THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED IY THIS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A SiGNiFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEN, CONSIDERATION NUST BE GZVEH TO THE CUI4JLATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPHENT ZN THIS AREA. ANY NEASURES NECESSARY TO MITIGATE THE CUIOLATIVE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO OR WITH DEVELOPNENT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THEN . CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISION, OR FUTURE PROVISiON, OF SIGNILIZATION AND LIGHTING OF THE INTERSECTION C~ AM) TIE STATE HIGIM~Y k~EN I.W~RANTS ME I~T. f/IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTE# OF THE AREA. ANY NEASURES TO NITIGATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE IMPACTS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE DEVELOPNEHT. THIS PC~TION OF THE STATE HIGHMAY IS INCLUDED IN THE CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN OF STATE HIGHWAYS ELIGIBLE FOR OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGHWAY DESIGNATION AND IN THE FUTURE YOUR AGENCY MAY WISH TO HAV~ THIS ROUTE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY. THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HiGHbAY, AND DEYELOPHENT ZH THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SCENIC HIGHbaY CONCEPT. IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS CONSIDERABLE PUBLIC CONCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO HEAVTLY TRAVELLED HIGHWAYS. ~.a*ND DEVELOPMENT, IN ORDER TO BE COHPATIBLE WITH THIS CONCERN, MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTENUATION MEASURES. DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHOULD INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY NOISE ATTEHUATIC~d. CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DEVELOPHINT I~EVIEW BRANCH P.O. Box 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92402 A COPY OF ANY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR REVISED APPROVAL. //A COPY OF ANY D(X~JHENTS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL STATE NIGHWAY RIGHT OF bay UPON RECORDATION OF THE MAP. ANY PROPOSALS TO FLIRTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC OR ENVIRONNENTAL STUDY. // A CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL OR TRACT HAP. //A CHECK PRINT OF THE PLANS FOR ANY INPRQ~HENTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE STATE NIGHWAY RIGHT OF baY. //A CHECK PRINT OF THE GRADING AND DRAIMAGE ~:)LANS FOIl THIS PECX)ERTY ~HEN AVAILABLE . Date: March 13, 1991 Riv-79-R3.180 (Co-Rte-PM) PP 224/ PM 26852 / CZ 11 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: We need cross-sections at 50 ft intervals, from 100 ft each side of the project limits, within state Right-Of-Way (R/W). The cross- sections must conform to the requirements of the attached "HANDOUT". The Caltrans Right-Of-Way (R/W) line must be shown and labeled on the next submittal. The driveways connections should be compatible with the existing and future road system of the area. The centerline of proposed driveway shown approximately 520 ft southwesterly of Margarita Road must be located and constructed shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868, SHEET NO 5. The Rancho California ware. district property shall not have a separate access to state highway. Show the existing state stationing along the highway Centerline according to the stations shown on PERMIT NO 90-1868. The Right-OF-Way in the Vicinity of Rancho California water district property does not agree with our record· The proposed driveway shown northwest of Winchester Road (HWY 79) must accommodate the DETECTOR SETBACK requirements (See attached sheet). State law requires Outdoor Advertising clearance for signs proposed adjacent to interstate and primary highways. Clearance must be obtained form: Highway Outdoor Advertising Branch California Department of Transportation 1120 N street Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 445-3337 6J~L rn (/~ m m -i m 0 ' J 0 0 6J~U D .~111[/ COUNTY Of SAN BERNAADIN~ S~I~,N BEF~NAF~Di~O COU~JTY ~S~ r, ~' ~ ~/ GENERAl. SERVICES AGENCY o,., ,,..-.. ,.,,..,..· ,,,,, ,,,.,,o. .... May 6, 1991 ~ ~ BCI General Contractors " attn: Rick Finken ~ ......... 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 PALEONTOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, PARCEL MAP # ~1361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY [,ear Mr. Finken, At your request, the San Bernardino County Muse%m~ has conducted a paleontologic assessment, including a search of pertinent geologic literature, a review of the Regional Paleontologic Locality Inventory, and a field survey for parcel # 21361, a 29- acre parcel in Rancho California, Riverside County. The parcel is on the northwest side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Franklin Avenue. Specifically, the parcel is within Township 7 South and Range 3 West. and i~ projected, falls within the southeast quarter of section 21, as shown on the Murrieta, CA 7.5 minute USGS topographic quadrangle map. Background Previous geologic mapping by Mann (1955) and Kennedy (1977) indicate that the parcel is located on recent alluvitm~ and on or ~ 'near the Pauba Formation. These authors report fossil · Pleistocene horse. The Pauba Formation overlies the Bi:.~hop Ash and thus is less than 700,000 years BP. Review of the Legional Paleontologic Locality Inventory at the San Bernardino County Museum does not. indicate that previous paleontologic resource a~sess,nents ]]ave been conducted for the Temecula parcel and that no paleontoloEic localities are recorded within one mile of the parcel. }towever, more than 200 paleontoloEic resource localities are known from the Pauba Formation in the Murrieta-Temecula area. The Pauba Formation unconformably overlies t~e Unnamed Sandstone. The faunal assemblage from the Pauba Formation in the Temecula- Murrieta area, summarized below, suggests a late Irvingtonian/early Rancholabrean LMA in contrast to the ear]y- late Irvingtonian fauna from the Unnamed Sandstone in the California Oaks area (Reynolds and Reynolds, 1990). imperial manm%oth mastodon large camel llama pronghorn deer large horse small horse jack rabbit cottontail shrew squirrel kangaroo rat pocket ~opher deer mouse wood rat. vole king snake rattlesnake pond turtle toad chub fish land snail Methods The field assessment was conducted on May 3, 1991, by Quintin Lake, Muse~uu Tech I I of the San Bernardino County Museums. He ]]as had previous experience in paleontolo&ic resource assessments and salvage in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Parcel # 21361 was inspected by foot traverses at approximately 30 meter intervals. Recent alluvi%m~ was verified to occur on the parcel in association with the Santa Gertrudis stream bed as was the presence of coarse to medi%m~-~rained sands interpreted to re[:.resent the Pauba Formation. Results and Recommendations Available ~eologic literature describes the Pauba Formation as fossiliferous. Resource localities in the Regional Paleontolo~ic Locality Inventory indicate that the Pauba Formation is very fossiliferous in the Murrieta-Temecula area. Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontolo~ic resources on the Temecula parcel. The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to ~'~develop a pro,ram of mitigation for the parcel which will conform to the 8uidelines of CEQA and Riverside County. The impact mitigation pro,ram must include, but not be limited to: 1. Monitorin~ of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontolosic resources by a qualified paleontolosic monitor. The monitor should be equipped to salvaEe fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments which are likely to contain the remains of small fossil mammals. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert e~ipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. The most cost-efficient method of salvage of small fossils is to remove sediments containinE the fossils to stockpiles offsite. The fossils can be removed by screen washinE elsewhere while excavation continues on site. 2. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification, including washing of sediments to recover small vertebrates. This will allow the fossils to be described in a report of findings and reduces the volume of matrix around specimens being stored. 3. Identification and curation of specimens illto all established museum repository with retrievable storage. ~. Prel:,aration of a report of findings with an appended it.emized inventory of $1:,ecimens. The report and inventory, when submitted to the approl:.riate Lead Agency, signifies coml:,letion of tile t:.rogram to mitigate impacts to paleol%tologic resources. References cited Kennedy, M.P. , 1977. Elsinc, re fault zone in southern Riverside County, Califoruia. California Division of Mines and Geology Special Re[:,ort 131:12 p. Mann, J.F., 1955. Geology of a portion of the Elsinore fault zone, California. California Division of Mines Special Report ~3:22 p. Reynolds, R.E. and R.L. Reynolds, 1990. IrvinEtonian? faunas from the Pauba Formation, Temecula, Riverside County, California, in Abstracts of Proceedinss, 1990 Mojave Deser Quatertiary Research Symposi%m~. Redlands, San Bernardino ~ounty Musetm~ Association Quarterly, 37(2):37. Kathleen Springer~ Project Manager Earth Sciences Recency and character of faulting alone the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM ~-- 024 O,,nge T,ie]~n~ '6~,dl~l~:~A 92374' 1714] 798-8570' 422-1610 //~ COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDIN \' .._~\~,_' ~ '_//./_.. GENERAL SERVICES AGENC~ · -~-~/'~- ~ ~ ~ OR. ALLAN D. GRIESEMER INVOICE: ~050.0506.1 To: BCI General Cont. ractor'~ att. n: Rick Fin].:en, Project Manager 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92390 For: PALEONTOLOGIC RECORDS SEARCH, PARCEL 21361, RANCHO CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Regional Paleontolo~ic Locality Inventory access fee and first hour: Field survey, 3 hrs @ $32./hr Mileage, 115 mi @ .38/h~ Report, 3 hrs @ $32./hr TOTAL $50.00 96.00 ~3.70 96.00 $285.70 ATTACHMENT 6 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY II Backqround 1. Name of Proponent: Bedford Properties/Costco Address and Phone Number of Proponent: PO Box 9016 Temecula, CA 92390 {71~) 676-56~1 Date of Environmental Assessment: April 25, 1991 Agency Requiring Assessment: CITY OF TEMECULA Name of Proposal, if applicable: Plot Plan No. 22q, Change of Zone No. 11, and Parcel Map No. 26852 Location of Proposal: Northwest corner of Marclarita and Winchester Roads 7. Proposal: Chanqe of Zone from R-R {Rural Residential) to C-P-S { Scenic Hiqhway Commercial) on 2it acres of a 57 acre site; subdivide the 57 acres into 13 commercial lots and a remainder; and construct a 175,000 square foot commercial center on 19.7 acres proposed for commercial zoninq. Environmental Impacts {Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: ae Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? X Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? X A: PP22a ~7 Yes ~aybe No e de The destruction. covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? ee Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siltetlon. deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake? ge Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes. landslides. mudslid,s. ground failure. or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? be The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture. or temperature. or any change in climate. whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? be Substantial changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X X X X X X X X X X X A: PP22a a8 Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? fe Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? Be Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? he Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: ae Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants {including trees, shrubs. grass. crops, and aquatic plants)? be Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? do Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals [birds, land animals including rep- tiles. fish and shellfish. benthic organisms or insects)? Yes Maybe No X X X X X X X X X X A: PP22q Yes Maybe No 0 10. 11. 12. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? be Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances {including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? be Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X X X X X X X X X X X X A: PP22a 50 13. 15. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? be Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Ce Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? de Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ee Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? fe Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? de Parks or other recreational facilities? ee Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services: Energy. Will the proposal result in: ae Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? be Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Yes X Maybe X X X X X X X X No X X X X X A: PP22~ 51 .f Yes Maybe No 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard {excluding mental health ) ? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? be Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X X X X X X X X X X X X A: PP22~ 52 21. Ce Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? be Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? {A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Co Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe X No X X X X X A: PP22~ 53 .... III Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation Earth 1,a, 1 .bo 1oco lod. loeo 1 .f. 1.g. Air 2.a. 2ob. 2.co No. The area is not with any known fault zones and is flat, vacant land. Maybe. All new development causes displacement and overcovering of soils. The project will incorporate open landscape areas, along with obtaining and adhering to City grading and building permits which will provide mitigation measures for this impact. The impact will not be significant. No. The area is currently flat vacant land and will not require substantial amounts of cut or fill to establish the proposed building pads. No. No unique geologic or physical features exist on site. The site is flat. Maybe. Wind and water erosion increase during grading activities. The potential for water erosion is low due to the fact that the site is flat. Wind erosion will be mitigated by standard grading practices and adherence to grading and building permits. Maybe. The area is traversed by Santa Gertrudis Creek which is being channelized as part of Assessment District No. 161. The flood control improvements are currently under construction. Construction of the channel per approved improvement plans will mitigate significant impacts. Maybe. The area is within a liquefaction hazard zone. A geotechnical investigation of the site was performed. Adherence to the recommendations made in County Geologic Report No. 793 will provide mitigation for possible impacts. Maybe. The project will impact local air quality due to the increased auto traffic in the area. Although the project should decrease overall travel miles by providing a shopping opportunity in closer proximity to the urban population. No overall impact. No. There are no industrial or commercial activities proposed that would cause objectionable odors. No. There are no industrial or commercial activities proposed that should alter air movement or temperature. A:PP22~ 5~ Water 3,b. oCo 3.do S.e. 3og° 3.h. 3,i. Plant Life t~oa. No. The project is adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Creek which is an intermittent flowing creek. The creek is currently being channelized with approval of Assessment District 161. The channelization is not a result of this project. This project is being designed to drain into the channelized flood control facilities. This drainage pattern will not result in any substantial change in either marine or fresh waters. Maybe. The project will cause changes in the absorption rate due to the overcovering of soil The natural drainage pattern will remain unchanged. Obtaining and adhering the grading and building permits will provide mitigation for possible impacts. No. The natural drainage pattern will remain the same and will not be altered by this project. No. The project will not increase the amount of water in any body of water. The site is not located in close proximity to any standing bodies of water. No. The surface runoff does not run directly into any bodies of water. No. The project does not propose any ground cuts or construction that would alter the direction or rate of flow of ground water. Maybe. The decrease in absorption rate will decrease the amount of ground water available from the site, but providing irrigated landscaping areas will mitigate for potential decreases. There will be no overall impact. No. The amount of water consumed will be a small increase in the overall water demand of the area. Maybe. The area is within a liquefaction zone and flood zone. Adherence to County Geologic Report No. 793 recommendation will provide mitigations for liquefaction impacts. The current channelization of Santa Gertrudis Creek will provide mitigation for the flood zone potential. Maybe. The mass grading of the site will eliminate the current vegetation on site. No rare species of plant were seen on site and the overall native vegetation of the area will not be significantly effected by this project. No. No rare or unique plant species were observed on this site. A: PP22~ 55 Maybe. The project includes proposed landscape areas that will introduce new plants to the area. The plants will be required to be drought tolerant and include native species. The impact will not be significant. The channelization of Santa Gertrudis Creek and Winchester Road are larger physical barriers. No. The area is not currently used for agricultural crops. Animal Life Sea. Maybe. The project~s mass grading will eliminate existing animal species, The area is impacted currently and increased commercial and industrial activity within the area does not make this site viable for maintaining native species, 5.b. Maybe. The site is within the historic range of the Stephen~s Kangaroo Rat which is a listed endangered species. The County and City have received a 10-A permit for the incidental take of the rat. The payment of a fee in this area has been deemed proper mitigation for the impact of habitat loss. S.C. No. No unique wildlife habitats exist on site. Noise ea. Maybe. The noise level will increase during construction of the site, which will be a temporary impact. The economical use will generate increased noise level mainly from vehicle use of the site. No residential structures are located near the site and the noise level will not be a significant impact to the area. 6.b. No. Severe noise generations are not anticipated at this site. Light and Glare Maybe. The project will require parking lot and outside lighting. The project will be conditioned to have lights hooded and directed away from public rights-of-way and adjoining properties. The project must conform to the requirements of the Palomar Observatory for lighting impacts. Land Use No. The project will alter the current vacant use of the site and the development doesn't conform to the current zoning for the site. The project does conform to the General Plan Guideline SWAP designation for the site of C' ~ Commercial ) and other commercial developments proposed or being constructed in the vicinity. A: PP22a 56 Natural Resources. Sod. No. The proposed commercial uses will not substantially increase the rate of use of natural resources, 9.b. No. The project will not substantially deplete non-renewable resources, The commercial use proposed will not generate a large demand on non-renewable resources, Risk of Upset 10.a. No. The commercial uses proposed do not include uses that would result in a risk of explosion, 10.b. No. The project will not interfere with emergency response plans or evacuation plans, Proper circulation has been conditioned to be maintained with development of the project, Population 11. No. The proposed commercial project will not alter the current population location or density, The project will provide an employment area for existing residence of the City and surrounding area. The project will not require an increased population demand, Housing. 12. No. The project is a proposed commercial center and will not affect housing demand. Transportation/Circulation 13.a. Yes. The commercial project will increase traffic and vehicular movement. The improvements being constructed with Assessment District No. 161 and improvements conditioned on the project will mitigate the impacts to a level of insignificance. The conditions include recommendations required per the Traffic Study submitted and approved for the project. 13.b. Maybe. The project will result in a demand for increased parking. The required parking for the proposed project will be provided on-site per City Codes as part of the project design. 13.c. Maybe. The project will impact the existing road system, but the impacts will be mitigated by the improvements required as Conditions of Approval on the project. 13.d. No. The project will not alter the existing road patterns. The project has been conditioned to improve the existing roadways. A:PP22~ 57 13.e. No. The project will not require or impact waterborne, rail or air traffic. The site will be served by an improved roadway system. 13.f. Maybe. The increased traffic will increase possible vehicle hazards. The project has been conditioned to provide adequate street improvements and safety controls to mitigate the possible impacts. Public Services l~.a,b,c, e,f. Maybe. The proposed development will impact these public services. The project has been conditioned to construct necessary improvements and pay appropriate fee mitigation for these impacts. No. The project is a commercial center and will not impact current or planned recreational facilities. Energy 15.a,b. No. The project is for the development of a standard type retail commercial center and will not require the use of substantial amounts of fuel or require new sources of energy to be developed. Utilities 16.a-f. No. The surrounding area has the current utilities available or they are being constructed with Assessment District No. 161. No additional utility systems will be required to be constructed with this project. Human Health 17.a. No. The project is a standard retail commercial type center and no uses are proposed that will cause a health hazard. 17 .b. Maybe. The project is within a liquefaction zone. County Geologic Report No. 793 was completed for the project. Adherence to the recommendation contained within the report will mitigate the potential liquefaction impacts. Aesthetics 18. No. The project is not within any designated view sheds and does not obscure scenic vistas. Recreation 19. No. The project is not being proposed on an existing or planned recreation or open space site. A:PP22~ 58 Cultural Resources 20.a. Maybe. The project is within the Pauba Formation which is fossiliferous. The applicant .shall retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a mitigation program prior to issuance of grading permits as outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. 20.b-d. No. A preliminary cultural survey was conducted on the site and no cultural resources were identified on site. Mandatory Findings of Significance 21 .a. No. The area does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas and no rare or endangered species exist on site. 21 .b. No. The project as conditioned will not significantly impact short or long term environmental goals. 21 .c. Maybe. The project, while not causing a significant impact to traffic circulation because of proposed improvements contained within the project design, will add to the accumulative effect on the transportation system. The current construction and additional improvements proposed by Assessment District No. 161 will provide mitigation measures for the accumulative impacts on the transportation system. A: PP22q 59 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. X April 25, 1991 Date For CITY OF TEMECULA A: PP22t~ 6O CITY OF TEMECULA LOCATION 'MAP CITY OF TEMECULA / / SP 1, CASE NO. SWAP MAP ~}.C. OATE L Ii' ITEM NO. 12 ~. KARRI WALTON MISS TEMECULA 1991 40580 CHAPARRAL DRIVE TEMECULA CA 92390 JUNE 27, 1991 CITY COUNCIL 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA CA 92390 DEAR CITY COUNCIL: HELLO! LET ME INTRODUCE MYSELF. I AM KARRI WALTON YOUR REIGNING MISS TEMECULA 1991. UPON WINNING THE MISS TEMECULA PAGEANT, I BECAME TEMECULA'S DELEGATE FOR MISS CALIFORNIA U.S.A. 1992. I AM ENTERING THIS PAGEANT AS MISS TEMECULA AND I INTEND TO PUT FORTH MY BEST EFFORT TO BE A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE OF TEMECULA VALLEY. IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THIS I WILL REQUIRE A MINIMUM SPONSORSHIP OF APPROXIMATELY $ 3,000. OF THIS $3,000. I AM REQUESTING $1,000. FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. THE REMAINING $2,000. I AM REQUESTING FROM LOCAL BUSINESSES. MY SPONSORSHIP FEES WILL BE USED FOR THE PURCHASE OF HOTEL AND TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS, REQUIRED COSTUMES AND GOWNS, TRANSPORTATION AND BASIC EXPENSES THAT ARE REQUIRED FROM A PAGEANT OF THIS NATURE. THIS PAGEANT WILL BE TELECAST NATIONWIDE, AUGUST 31, 1991. TEMECULA IS GAINING RESPECT THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS AN OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY AND I WILL BE PROUD TO REPRESENT TEMECULA IN WALNUT CREEK CALIFORNIA THIS SUMMER BUT I DO REQUIRE YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. T~IANK YOU~ ~ KARRI WALTON MISS TEMECULA 1991 ITEM NO. 13 APPROVAL FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER '~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Joe Hreha, Manager of Information System~/~~'/ July 2, 1991 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA STREET BANNER PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Consider the approval of the Street Banner Program and funding and direct Staff to implement the program and procure and install two pole assemblies at the recommended locations. Adopt a Resolution to transfer $12,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance to Street Banners. DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tern Birdsall requested that Staff look into the implementation of a City of Temecula Street Banner Program. On May 14, 1991, the City Council directed Staff to pursue the program returning to the City Council with final costs, program development, funding identification, and exact installation locations. Attached is a proposed Resolution to transfer $12,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance to Street Banners. Also attached are documents showing projected costs, a procedure for hanging street banners, banner locations, street banner responsibilities, banner examples, a pole assembly drawing, a typical section drawing, and banner construction specifications. At the recommended locations, neither existing poles nor other structures are present to hang the banners. FISCAL IMPA C T: The Street Banner Program is not appropriated in the FY 91/92 budget. A transfer of $12,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance would be required to implement the Street Banner Program. ATTACHMENTS: Documents supporting recommendation/discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 BUDGET TO ACCOMPLISH A BUDGET TRANSFER AS DETAILED IN ATTACHMENT A The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. That the FY 1990-91 Annual Budget of the City of Temecula is hereby amended to transfer $12,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance to Street Banners as detailed in Attachment A. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 2nd day of July, 1991. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATrEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 4\Re.hi85 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 91- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 2nd day of July, 1991 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk 4\P. mo~185 2 ATTACHMENT A BUDGET TRANSFERS TRANSFER FROM: A/C No. 001-301 Descrip. Unreserved Fund Balance Amount 2,000.00 TRANSFER TO: A/C No, 001-164-999- 44-5630 Descrip. Street Banners TOTAL Amount 2,000.00 2,000.00 4\Re~a185 3 S TREE T BANNER PR 0 GRAM C 0 S TS Union Metal Corporation Pole Assembly Pole Top Cover Assembly Nut Covers Self-tapping Screws Span Wire Clamps Anchor Bolts Pole Design Freight TOTAL COST 6,250 Moore Electrical Construction, Inc. Complete Installation TOTAL COST 5.000 GRAND TOTAL 1,250 Staff has coordinated with Southern California Edison and Inland Valley Cablevision to provide no cost banner installation and removal support. The Street Banner Permit fee would be established at the minimum amount required to cover Staff processing of applications. The affected property owners at the targeted locations have been contacted and do not object to the Program. STREET BANNER PROCEDURES It is the intent of this program to assist in advertising and informing the public of community events occurring in the City. All requests to hang banners, for the purpose previously stated, must be approved by the City Manager and may be subject to the approval of the City Council, as determined by the City Manager. LOCATIONS OF BANNER POLE ASSEMBLIES Front Street - Front Street - Northern U. S. Post Office property line Northern Bianchi International property line just South of the corner of Calle Cortez and Front Street CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLATION 1) A Street Banner Permit signed by an official representative of a non-profit organization, as defined by Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), must be submitted for approval by the City Manager. It must be accompanied by a Banner Permit Fee in the amount of $50.00 per location. 2) A Street Banner Permit signed by an official representative of any other organization must be submitted for approval by the City Manager and may be subject to approval by the City Council. It must be accompanied by a certificate of insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 naming the City of Temecula as an additional insured and a Banner Permit Fee in the amount of $50.00 per location if approval is determined by the City Manager and $100.00 if subject to approval by the City Council. 3) The sponsoring organization is responsible for the design, making, and the delivery of the banner(s). The banner(s) will be hung by Southern California Edison and Inland Valley Cablevision as a community service. 4) The banner(s) must be hang no lower than 18.5 feet above the roadway and must meet the banner specification established by the Public Works Department. 5) The banner(s) may be displayed approximately thirty days prior to the event and will be removed within three days of the end of the event. Specific dates for banners to be displayed and removed will be established during the permit process. Banner(s) will be available for pickup by the sponsoring organization at the Public Works Department after removal. Arrangements for pickup must be made by the sponsoring organization. STREET BANNER RESPONSIBILITIES ORGANIZATION 1) Makes application to hang banner(s) through the Public Works Department. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2) Obtains information on the purpose of the banner(s), date of the event, sponsoring organization, site(s) requested, dates, etc. 3) Checks schedule to see that site(s) are available. 4) Informs organization representative of technical requirements governing the hanging of street banner(s), fees, and permit procedures. 5) Has the organization representative complete the Street Banner Permit, providing all requested information. ORGANIZATION 6) Returns to the Public Works Department the signed Street Banner Permit accompanied by the required certificates and fees, if applicable. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7) Sends Street Banner Permit to the City Manager and City Council, if applicable, for approval or disapproval. CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL 8) Approves or disapproves the permit, if applicable. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 9) Notifies organization and makes arrangements to have banner(s) hung and removed. POSSIBLE BANNER USES EVENT EXAMPLES EVENT MONTH Great Temecula Tractor Race Wine and Balloon Festival July 4th Parade Veteran's Parade Hot Rod Run Arts Festival City's Birthday Pumpkin Run PRCA Rodeo Wine Festival October May July November March August December October October May SAMPLE BANNERS MIGHT READ: FINISH ASS'Y ND. c? 14- 00~ ~0~ Max Max J U 'J U LJ LJ 3/8" Nylon Rope , Existing CabLe Air' Ven~" s, -(~ Existing CabLe BANNER DETAIL AIR VENT DETAIL ]~ANNER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. Maximum size 3 Feet by 40 Feet, ;:), Minimum weight oF cctnvcis 14,7P oz (~10) or* equivitent 3. 7 inch by 7 inch ciir, vent ever'y 5 Feet, 4, No 4 9r,ommets mciy be pLciced in aLL 4 cor,ner,s 5, Doubte snap hat,heSS hooks used ever'y 36 inches, 6. 50 Feet o~ 3/8 inch nylon r,ope extendin9 Fr,om each end 9momme-t. IF banner' is tess -than 40 Feet, -tatar (en9th oF r,ope mus-t extend 45 Feet; ptus -the diFFer,ence between 40 Feet Lind the (en91;h oF the banner`. ITEM NO. 14 ,,.~- ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER--~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: OA TE: SUBJECT.' City Council Mark J. Ochenduszko July 2, 1991 Funding Assistance for Temecula Museum and Center Old Town Visitor's RECOMMENDA T/ON: It is recommended that: 1) No large scale funding be provided to the Temecula Museum and Old Town Visitor's Center at this time; 2) Any funding that may be provided in either the short or long term be from redevelopment tax increment; and 3) Consideration for funding of the Temecula Museum and/or Visitor's Center be undertaken at the time when all redevelopment projects are evaluated and prioritized in relation to each other by the Redevelopment Agency. DISCUSSION: At the City Council meeting of May 28, 1991, members of the Temecula Town Association and Temecula Museum requested the City Council to consider providing funding for the lease of a joint Tourism/Visitor's Center and Temecula Museum in Old Town. Three options for the lease of a site were identified by the Museum Board of Directors including: 1) The "Old Sears Store" at 41950 Main Street (2200 square feet, $2,970 per month lease rate); 2) Current location of "Its About Time Clock Store" at 28601 Front Street (1200 square feet, $1,656 per month lease rate); and 3) Current location of "Packing Crate Gifts" at 28636 Front Street, Suite (1823 square feet, $2,862 per month lease rate). The Museum Board strongly prefers the Sears Store site because of the building's size, parking facilities, and outdoor exhibit opportunities on the site. Staff has met with Temecula Museum Board Members and reviewed options other than leasing a site including: 1) Purchase of a site and then renting the site to the Museum and Visitor's Center (the Old Sears Store has been offered by its owner for $610,000); 2) Finding a new site which could be purchased, renovated or constructed, and rented to the museum and visitors' center; and 3) Continuing the lease of the current or renting another site until long term strategic planning and project identification for the redevelopment district can be completed. The idea of using redevelopment funds for a project such as this one has merit. A visitor's center and museum together at one site could be compatible uses of a building, and each might compliment the other in service provision and income generation. An attractive, centrally located, successful museum and visitor's center could serve as a draw to the Old Town section of the City and enhance retail sales. The long term funding of such a project (whether that involves City purchase with a lease to the museum/visitor's center, long term lease assistance or some other type of funding support) should, however, be considered in relation to other potential redevelopment projects. Staff is currently compiling a list of and describing such projects, and this information will be provided to the Redevelopment Committee and Redevelopment Agency in August, 1991. Contact has been made with the property owner of the current site of the Temecula Museum and he has expressed a willingness to extend the lease for one year. The City recently provided funding to the Chamber of Commerce for visitor promotion, and the opportunity may exist for the Chamber to provide at least some of the visitor center services sought by the Old Town Merchant's Association. FISCAL IMPACT.' Any monies provided for this activity should be derived from redevelopment tax increment. ATT: May 28, 1991 Agenda Report April 24, 1991 Correspondence from Temecula Museum Old Town Temecula Museum Forecast of Operations Offer to Lease and/or sell Sears Building June 24, 1991 Museum correspondence Councilmember Lindemans APPROVAr. ~ CITY ATTORNEY (. FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Council David F. Dixon May 28, 1991 Temecula Tourism and Visitors' Center RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council direct staff to review the feasibility of funding a Tourism and Visitors' Center and report back to Council with their findings. S774FF REPORT: The attached letter and petition with more than 300 names was received by staff on May 17th with a request that it be placed on the May 28th Agenda for consideration. The "Committee for Tourism Center" is requesting that a portion of City funds be used toward a Tourism and Visitors' Center. The Committee is proposing that the Center be strategically located in Old 'i'own with the Temecula Museum. The Center would serve approximately 1,000 museum visitors per month as well as special event and Old Town tourists. The Center's goal is to promote tourism thereby assisting our local businesses and increasing the City's tax base. As there wasn't sufficient time to conduct an in-depth study of the merits of this venture before placing it on the Agenda, it is recommended that Council direct staff to research the matter and report back with their findings. FINANCIAl IMPACT: Unknown at this time. THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box 792 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0021 (714) ~7~-~329 (Curator) ' / / Mr. David Dixon City Manager City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, Ca. 92390 RE: Relocation Project The Temecula Museum April 24,1991 Dear Mr. Dixon: Enclosed is information pertaining to the upcoming reloca- tion of the Temecula Museum. This knowledge was obtained thru: A. Meetings with each potential landlord B. Examination of each site with the landlord or commercial representative C. Receipt of written and verbal offers D. Further examination and opinions of Board Members and Volunteer Docent of the Temecula Museum E. Meeting Wednesday of Executive Board The top 3 locations are discussed in the tabbed sections of this corresondence. Move-in expenses, etc. are also studied and incorporated into Choice #1. I will be out of town Thursday and Friday. Mr. Dennis Frank Executive Secretary,(6?8-1922) and Mr. Bill Harker, Treasur- er,(675-4718) will be available both days to answer any further questionm, or to proceed with contacting the chosen landlord in preparing a lease, etc. On behalf of the Board of Directors and Volunteers of the Temecula Museum, thank you for your positive and poste haste actions in this important matter. Sincerely, Mrs Becca Nakaya President Board of Directors Temecula Museum Commercial Building (Old Sears Store) 41950 Main Street Temecula, California #1 Owner: Lloyd Sever 30105 Cabrillo Avenue Temecula, Ca, 92390 575-9249 Building Size: 2200+/- Square Feet Lot Size: 50 x 150 = 7500 Square Feet See attached offer letter, please ........ Board Comments: 1, Excellent location with good parking 2. Interior newly decorated, free of all partitions, light and cheerful 3, Carpeted floor helps acoustics and keeps maintenance at a minimum 4. Exterior redone with Western look and says "museum" even without a sign, 5. High ceilings for large displays 6. Chain link fence already installed. 7. Two wa115 are block 8. We control our own destiny .... no attached tenants that we have no control over. 9. Rent and lease offer an exceptional value at $2500. and, additionally, an offer of "free rent" for an unspecified period of time. 10, Nuseum sign on rear of building has visibility to Butterfield Square area and Ne?cede$ area, Additional Comments: Space allowe growth in museum programs, school outreach programs, "friends of museum" activities, and the ability to receive artifacts of the valley for new displays. Excellent location for "Visitors Center" in Old Town as front has two entrances and two baths. Excellent property to sub-lease to another compatible retail store. ESTIMATED MOVE-IN EXPENSES: $7,500.00 Exact moving quotations cannot be made until next week. Move-in Expenses would include: If not "volunteered", a nominal expense in having a museum professional help with p~acement of display area. Could be provided by county museum system. Professlonal moving of displays with volunteer help. If not "volunteered" .... installation of a security system. Museum has one now. Open House ..... scheduled for the latter part of July To Include: Friday Evening .... By Invitation Only Given to announce museum's new location and, desired, Temecula's new visitors center Apprise our "united" purpose with the City to "Preserve the Past" of the Temecula Valley C® Publicly thank the City for their contrib- ution. Will include: Finger foods, wine from Temecula Wineries, and soft drinks Saturday Day ......... Open to Public A. Same as Friday Evening W~11 include: Soft dr~nks, and cookies... Addi[iona1 expenses: Invitations Stamps Flyers Newspaper publicity 92590 CO~MEP. CIAI. BUILDING 41950 ~fain Street Temecula, California Building size: 2200± square feet Lot size: 50 x 150 -- 7500 sauare feet Parkinq: Additional 50 x 150 souare feet adjoining parking lot, fully fenced and paved. 10 spaces on building lot; 16 on adjoining lot. Building is newly remodeled, air conditioned and insulated, fully carpeted. 2 bathrooms, 2 front doors and 2 rear doors. Owner desires to lease building as a single unit at the rate of $1.35 per square foot, for a total monthly rent of $2,970.00. Owner will pay property taxes, fire insurance on structure and water. Electrical, gas, and maintenance of parking lot to be paid by leasee. Owner may consider dividing the building into two units of 1100± square feet each. Each unit would have one bathroom, one front and rear door, and separate electric meters, air and heating systems. Cost of maintaining parking areas would be shared equally. Unit A (next to two story building) would rent for $1.35 per sauare foot, or $1,485.00 per month. Unit B (East side with bay window) would rent for $1.48 per square foot, or $1,628.00 per month. The building was designed for a possible split, and it will take approximately seven working days to install the divid- inq wall. A minimum two-year lease is required. Owner: Loyd A. Sever 30105 Cabrillo Avenue Temecula, CA 92390 714/676-9249 Loyd ~ever TEHECULA III 28601 Front Street Temecula, California Owner: Mike Butler Representative: Bob Morris Home 676-2893 Work Site 699-9629 Current location of: Its About Time Clock Store Store area: Rent: (Verbal) 1200 square feet $1.38 per square foot..gross lease Landlord might be soft on orice. Special Request: That the museum stay open the hours of other retail stores in Temecula III... Board Members feel this might be difficult to staff volunteers long hours during the holiday seasons, Other Comments: 1. Good location and visibility 2. Size boarders on being too small for growth program 3. Great area for sign visibility Keeping same hours as other retailers a negative factor Rent not a good value for a museum, however reason- able for pure retail PACKING CRATE GIFTS 28636 Front Street Suite 108 Temecula, California Owner/Landlord: S. Michelle Perry Phone: 676-1358 Space: Option B 1823 Square Feet Rent: Sublease Situation Option B calls for $1.21 + $.36 CANS = $2862.00* See attached offer letter, please ...... Additional Comments: 1. Makes museum part of an existing operation thru sub-leasing 2. Good visibility and good location near Old Town attractions 3. Rent on high side 4. More space for money at Old Sears Store 5. Near new restaurant a plus 5. Adequate parking in rear Mrs. Perry states if her CAMS decrease, ours will follow. 28636 FRONT ST. · SUITE 108 · TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 676-1358 Old Town Temecula Museum 28670 Front St. Temecula, CA. 92390 Becca Nakaya April 22, 1991 Dear Becca, Thank you for your interest to lease the space at 28636 Front St. Suite 108 Temecula, CA. Per your request, I've enclosed a floor plan of the space with 3 options noted depending on the amount of space the museum is interested in leasing. Option A: Option B: Option C: 814 sq ft. X $1.21 + $.36 CAMS = $1278.00 1823 sq ft. X $1.21 + $.36 CAMS = S2862.00 2637 sq.ft. X $1.21 + $.36 CAMS = $4148.00 Although I cannot guarantee it the current owner of the buildinR has expressed an indication that the CAM charges will be decreased to approximateley $.25 which would decreases the lease by approx. S200.00. If he does this I will pass on this savings to you. Electric and gas bill are approx. : Option A: $75-100.00 Option B:$175-225.00 (greater sq ft. plus more spotlights) Option C: the combination of A&B Through my current lease, I could lease the space to the museum until 11/1/93 with a 5 year option to renew at current market price depending upon your needs. Due to other interested parties, I would appreciate your response to this proposal by 4/24/91. I look forward to working with you and the Old Town Temecula Museum. encl: floor nlmn Sincere.ly, S. Michele Perry,.., 28636 FRONT ST, · SUITE 108 · TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 676-1358 Current Building Benefits: This space is ideal for the museum use due to existing modificatins: Modification: Wood beam ceiling Carpeted Lighting installed w/ spotlights Heating & Air Conditioning Security system Bank vault Volunteer/employee restrooms Public Restrooms 60 auto parking lot Benefit: A better security ceilinR than usual T-Bar ceiling & decorative No capitol outlay Better displays No capitol outlay Can be adapted for your needs Can be used for display and tourist draw or secured storaRe Inside space for exclusive use A key is available for the ge clean restrooms next door Large parking space for your customers Although there are 3 doors, one can be blocked off by the new restaurant and the other two would need to remain open during business hours as any newer building in the City of Temecula for fire code requirements. The rear door is also an asset for access for your patrons who use the rear parking lot. There are other security measures that can be utilized other than limitinR safety exits that current museums use. The bank vault is currently th~ home for the Visitor Center. If the museum would be interested in pursuit of this service, I would be available for consultation. EXHIBIT A C~ INFORMATION ON RELOCATION OPTIONS: CURRENT USABLE DISPLAY SPACE IN MUSEUM MANY TURNOVERS IN DOWNTOWN OLD TOWN ...... 600-700 SQ.FT Temecula III space available ..... MOST IDEAL A. centrally located B. good parking and visibility C. adequate space for growth for permanent or temp- orary stay D. owner should negotiate because of vacancy ....... current rent is $1800 per month. E. safe new building to house museum F. good draw for other stores... Lower level of Rancon Building on Front Street now looking for retail renters. (across from Tem III) Butterfield Square is beginning a turnover... A. Liz Pasqual, owner, Bob Morris, builder Manaqed by Burnham's Carlene Daniels (or Danielson) B. Quaint center needs draw and future renters will be demanding upgrades in construction ..... owners will have to go along sooner or later if they want to keep their tenants C. Former location of Chocolate Florist (free- standing building of 873 sq.ft. could be upgraded for museum ...... with available outside display area on porches and in courtyard (with permission of tenants). House at the "T" of Mercedes and Third (past Butter- field Square and the Ponderosa Inn) A. (heresay) Was upgraded for commercial use...and sold as tho it was zoned accordingly. B. Zoned Residential .... I think· C. Advertising ..... freeway view and in Old Town D. Sq. footage unknown E. Rent unknown THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - INDEX TEMECULA MUSEUM BOARD OF DIRECTORS TEMECULA MUSEUM COMMITTEES TEMECULA MUSEUM DOCENTS TEMECULA MUSEUM VISITOR STATISTICS SAM HASSON LETTER, DATED MARCH 26, 1991 MUSEUM BOARD RESPONSE LETTER, DATED APRIL 2, 1991 MUSEUM BOARD LETTER TO TONY TOBIN, DATED APRIL 2, 1991 TONY TOBIN RESPONSE LETTER\ENCLOSURES, DATED APRIL 9, 199I SAM HICKS INVENTORY OVERLAND BANK/KAISER DEVELOP~IENT INVENTORY & BILL OF SALE TEMECULA MUSEUM 1990-1991 BUDGET TEMECULA MUSEUM REgUEST FOR MONIES FROM TEMECULA'S "COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM" HENRY ANN COMPANY PREPARED BUDGET FOR ST. CATHERINE CHURCH RESTORATION, DATED NOVEMBER 28, 1990 GRANT DEED, DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS FOR SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK (COPY) TEMECULA MUSEUM LEASE (COPY} ORIGINAL ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, CERTIFIED JUNE 19, 1987 DEPT. OF TREASURAY EMPLOYMENT I.D. INFORMATION APPLICABLE MUSEUM CORRESPONDENCE/COMMUNICATION TEMECULA MUSEUM OFFICERS 1990 PRESIDENT: 1st V.P. 2nd V.P. Treasurer Exec. Sec. Curator Historian Becca Nakaya Nancy Maurice Helga Berger Bill Harker Dennis Frank Tony Tobin Glenn Travis 676-0322 676-3060 699-4402 676-4718 699-4950 676-6329 676-017 Adlesperger, Richard Berger, Hel~a Bell, Emma Davis, Mary Frank, Dennis Harker, Bill Herron, Sis DIRECTORS Hopkins, Betty Humbert, Paul Lesser, Selma Maurice, Nancy Nakaya, Becca Travis, Glenn Welsh, Barbara EXECUTIVE BOARD Becca Nakaya, Nancy Maurice, President 1st Vice Pres. Dennis Frank, Ex. Sec. Bill Harker, Treasurer TEMECULA MUSEUM COMMITTEES Publicity Fund Raising Dotehis £ducstion Arts & Publication Chairman Member Chairman Hembet Chairman Member Chairman Member thaiman Richard Adelsperger Selma Lesser Becca Nakaya Dennis Frank Nancy Maurice Sis Herron Bill Harker 8ecca Nakaya Sis Herron Emma Bell Nancy Maurice Mary Davis Tony Tobin Glen Travis Mary Davis Membership Acquisitions Chairman Chairman Tony Tobin Facilities/New Building Co-Chairmen Advisor Builder Advisor Decorator Museum Oecotatot/ Advisor Tony Tobin Dennis Frank Becca Nakaya *Lottie Aidstat * Lottie will help us with some pricing TEMECULA MUSEUM DOCENT ROSTER Adams, Cindy Bell, Emma Bendikson, Maxine Boetticer, Betsw Cook, Flay Entsminger, Emelie Flesher, Vivian Hynch, Helen Larson, Pauline Lesser, Selma Lewis, BeckF Marsden, Carol Norland, Bob & Louise Restivo, Audrey Taylor, Bob & Bea Thompson, Mary Travis, Glenn VanCamp, Phil & Mary Volarevich, Dee Walsh, Lorette Webster, Donna Adams, Charlene Affolter, Barbara Akins, Apolomia Allred, Sharon Baker, Sally Berqer, Helqa Burrows, Jack Davis, Mary Grimes, Edna Leather, Charlotte Lincoln, Peggy Mahurin, June STANDBYS Maldonado, Marsha McCord, Dottie McCurdy, Clara Mitterwallner, Olivia Moroz, Connie Pelonero, Connie Patterson, Gladys Schmidt, Joan Tobin, Tony Verdin, Lila Welsh, Barbara Williamson, Ginnie THE TEMECULA MUSEUM -- VISITOR STATISTICS MONTHLY STATISTICS: FROM PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 23, 1989 Total Recorded Visitors: Total Average Monthly Visitors: Total Foreign Visitors: Total Foreign Countries Represented: SEPTEMBER 1990: Total Recorded Visitors: OCTOBER & NOVEMBER 1990: Total Recorded Visitors: DECEMBER 1990: Total Recorded Visitors: Out of State Visitors: Out of Country Visitors: Total States Represented: Total Foreign Countries Represented: JANUARY 1991: Total Recorded Visitors: Out of State Visitors: Out of Country Visitors: Total States Represented: Total Foreign Countries Represented: thru AUGUST 31, 1990 12,424 1,129 390 1,043 1,958 926 297 65 38 13 1,129 190 77 28 13 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - FOREIGN VISITOR STATISTICS PERIOD OF: September 23, 1989 thru August 31, 1990 (Alphabetical Order) (Numerical Order) AUSTRALIA 8 CANADA 95 BAJA 30 ENGLAND 86 BELGIUM 7 JAPAN 60 CANADA 95 SPAIN 35 CHINA (HONG KONG) 5 BAJA 30 DENMARK 7 GERMANY 27 ENGLAND 86 ITALY 10 FINLAND 1 AUSTRALIA 8 FRANCE 5 SWEDEN 8 GERMANY 27 BELGIUM 7 GUATEMALA 1 DENMARK 7 HOLLAND 7 HOLLAND 7 HUNGARY 4 FRANCE 5 IRELAND 4 CHINA (HONG KONG) 5 ITALY 10 MEXICO 5 JAPAN 60 HUNGARY 4 MEXICO 5 IRELAND 4 NEW ZEALAND 3 TAIWAN 4 NORWAY 1 VENEZUELA 4 SCOTLAND 3 SCOTLAND 3 SPAIN 35 NEW ZEALAND 3 SWEDEN 8 FINLAND 1 SWITZERLAND 1 NORWAY 1 TAIWAN 4 SWITZERLAND 1 VENEZUELA 4 GUATEMALA 1 TOTAL VISITORS 390 390 TOTAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES REPRESENTED: 25 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - VISITOR STATISTICS DECEMBER 1990 BY FOREIGN COUNTRY (Alphabetical Order) Numerical Order AUSTRALIA 3 FRANCE 15 BELGIUM 2 ENGLAND 14 CANADA 7 CANADA ENGLAND 14 NEW ZEALAND 4 FRANCE GERMANY GERMANY 4 SPAIN HUNGARY 2 IRELAND IRELAND 3 AUSTRALIA MEXICO 3 MEXICO 3 NETHERLANDS 2 NETHERLANDS 2 NEW ZEALAND 4 BELGIUM SCOTLAND 2 SCOTLAND SPAIN 4 HUNGARY TOTAL 65 TOTAL 65 TOTAL COUNTRIES REPRESENTED: 13 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - VISITOR STATISTICS DECEMBER 1990 BY STATE (Alphabetical Order) (Numerical Order) ALASKA 6 ARIZONA 28 COLORADO 13 CONNECTICUT 7 DELAWARE 2 FLORIDA 12 IDAHO 1 ILLINOIS 5 INDIANA 4 IOWA 2 KANSAS 4 LOUISIANA 4 MAINE 1 MARYLAND 2 MASSACHUSETTS 7 MICHIGAN 9 MINNESOTA 8 MISSOURI 4 MONTANA 2 NEVADA 10 NEW JERSEY 14 NEW MEXICO 24 NEW YORK 4 NORTH CAROLINA 4 OHIO 8 OKLAHOMA 2 OREGON 2 RHODE ISLAND 2 SOUTH CAROLINA 4 SOUTH DAKOTA 8 TENNESSEE 2 TEXAS 13 UTAH 3 VERMONT 6 VIRGINIA 3 WASHINGTON 25 WISCONSIN 1 WYOMING 1 ARIZONA WASHINGTON NEW MEXICO NEW YORK OREGON NEW JERSEY COLORADO TEXAS FLORIDA NEVADA MICHIGAN SOUTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA OHIO MASSACHUSETTS CONNECTICUT VERMONT ALASKA PENNSYLVANIA KANSAS INDIANA MISSOURI SOUTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA NEBRASKA VIRGINIA UTAH WYOMING DELAWARE IOWA MARYLAND OKLAHOMA MONTANA TENNESSEE RHODE ISLAND IDAHO WISCONSIN MAINE 28 25 24 20 20 14 13 13 12 10 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 TOTAL 297 TOTAL 297 TOTAL STATES REPRESENTED: 38 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - VISITOR STATISTICS JANUARY 1991 BY FOREIGN COUNTRY {Alphabetical Order) (Numerical Order) AUSTRALIA 1 FRANCE 23 CANADA 20 CANADA 2O CHINA 2 MEXICO 10 ENGLAND 3 SWITZERLAND DENMARK 4 DENMARK 4 FRANCE 23 SOUTH AFRICA 4 MEXICO 10 ENGLAND PAKISTAN 1 ROMANIA ROMANIA 2 CHINA '2 SCOTLAND 1 SCOTLAND SOUTH AFRICA 4 AUSTRALIA SWITZERLAND 5 PAKISTAN USSR 1 USSR TOTAL 77 TOTAL TOTAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES REPRESENTED: 13 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM - VISITOR STATISTICS JANUARY 1991 BY STATE (Alphabetical Order) (Numerical Order) ALASKA 1 ARIZONA 7 COLORADO 11 CONNECTICUT 4 FLORIDA 6 IDAHO 4 ILLINOIS 5 KENTUCKY 2 MARYLAND 1 MASSACHUSETTS 11 MICHIGAN 3 MINNESOTA 12 MISSOURI 6 NEVADA 8 NEW JERSEY 8 NEW'MEXICO 3 NEW YORK 8 NORTH DAKOTA 4 OHIO 14 OKLAHOMA 5 OREGON 9 PENNSYLVANIA 2 SOUTH CAROLINA 5 TENNESSEE 1 TEXAS 17 VIRGINIA 6 WASHINGTON 8 WISCONSIN 13 TEXAS OHIO WISCONSIN MINNESOTA MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO OREGON NEW JERSEY NEVADA NEW YORK WASHINGTON ARIZONA FLORIDA MISSOURI VIRGINIA ILLINOIS OKLAHOMA SOUTH CAROLINA. CONNECTICUT IDAHO NORTH DAKOTA MICHIGAN NEW MEXICO KENTUCKY PENNSYLVANIA ALASKA TENNESSEE MARYLAND 17 14 13 12 11 11 9 8 8 8 8 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 2- 2 1 1 1 TOTAL 190 TOTAL 190 TOTAL STATES REPRESENTED: 28 Swing Inn Care 8on~ & G~ Hossofi 28676 Front ST ~mecu~ Ce 92380 P.O. Box 556 March 26, 1991 OLD TOWN TEHECULA MUSEUH Dear Board of DLrectora, Due to cLrcuastances beyond our control we are hereby ,~vin, you notice to vacate the premises of the Old Town Tenecula MuseuR &t 28670 Front Street by Nov. 1. 1991. Please acknowled,e in writinl that you have received this notice and understand its contents. SI'.p~Ri:LY, , SAHUEL THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box ~ Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0021 (714) 676-6329 (Curator) April 2, 1~1 Mr. Samuel Hasson Swing Inn Care 28676 Front Street Temecula, California 92390 RE: The Temecula Museum Dear Mr. Hasson: He are in receipt of your letter dated March 26, 1991 and acknowledge your request to vacate the current address of the museum at 28670 Front Street, by"Nov~, ember 1, 1991. We greatly appreciate your early~notification, as pre-planning is lengthy and extensive. But more than that, the Board and its Bocents laud your generosity and support of 'the Temecula Museum these past yc~rs. Without a doubt, it could not have survived and prospered without your assistance and yes, your charity. The Museum will work with you in every way possible thru these upcomin9 changes, but kindly asks, if the premises have not been sold or assigned to someone else, the rent is the main cause 'for vacation and if an increase would serve to extend our time there. We would appreciate an answer prior.to'our next Board Meeting, April 16th. Host SincereIx. NTs. Becca Nakaya President Board of Directors Temecula Museum THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box ?92 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0021 (714) 676-6329 (Cammr) ~pril 2¥ 199! Mr. Tony Tobin P.O. Box Temecula, California 92390 RE: The Temecula Museum Dear Tony, We have received written notification to vacate the premises where the museum is located by November 1, 1991. Mr. Hasson's letter is dated March 26, 1991. Dueto these circumstances and the city's takeover of the redevelop- ment program,.the Executive Board.met on April 2rid to discuss and act. The Executive Board finds there are two solutions to these upcoming changes. The first is to turn the entire operation o? the museum over to you, as a large percentage o? the contents are personally yours. Other displays and artifacts will be returned, kept on loan, ar sold, according to the wishes or the current. owners. Our second alternative is to approach the City:.of Temecula for support and management. This Board finds itself at a crossroads concerning the life and opera- tion of the Temecula Museum and because of this, is contacting you on how the items belonging to.you, should:' be dispersed. He find there are three choices: A. You may donate your artifacts to the Temecula Museum 8. Based upon an appraised value determined and accepted by both you and the Board, the Board may purchase the artifacts from you. C. YOU may take back your artifacts on a designated date, or by November 1, 1991, whichever comes first. In lieu of sending this by certified mail, Nancy Maurice has agreed to present it to you for discussion. Please respond by Friday, April 12, 1991, in writing, on how youwould best like this transaction to be handled. The Executive Board is open to any ideas and/or dis- cussion on these issues, however, your response by the 12th is essential in our negotiations to keep the museum open. In your response, please include all appropriate dollar amounts when deemed necessary. Thanks, Tony, for helping us work thru these ma3or changes in the life of the Temecula Museum. Mrs. 8ecca Nakays President ' Board of Directors April 9, 1991 ?emecula Museum Mrs. Becca Nakaya President, Bd. of Directors RE, Temecula Museum Artifacts. Dear Becca, In answer to your letter of April 2nd. in regards to the disposition if my artifacts in the museum and also in storage in my barn for use in our, hopefully, new museum, I would prefer choice 'B#. Quote- 'Based on an apprasiad value determined and accepted by both you and the board, the board may purchase the artifacts from you.' end quote. After the purchase I would donate back to the museum 1/3 (one third) of the purchase price as an endowment fund. If the museum will no longer exist after Nov. 1st. I will remove all my artifacts from the present location as I do not want to nor am I able to operate a museum on my own. We should do everything possible to keep this museum in operation for the good of the community. It should be done by the City of Temecula to preserve its historic past. ~hat a sad moment in the life of our historic area. so much willbe lost to our future generations. Artarched is a list of my artifacts, and the appraised value, now .in the museum. Also a partial list of things ! have in storage at home, and an estimate of the value of same. There are many more items not listed because they are packed away. All these can be appraised at the time they are put into the new museum. There are hudreds of artifacts that we will aquire if and when we have a new building to display them in, in other words a new museum. These include many historical pictures and documents. Sincerely, Tony ~tn Curator and Bd. Member TemeculaMuseum INVENTORY Folio Locscion INVENTORY C411~1 by Entered b, ,f~,~, .,..~/~on O ESG R I PT I O N NO. ~UANTIT~ )~ PRICE Enmined by UNIT IJ, tgc~/, / ! I i i I EXTIrNIION I NO. I Amo~m Forward UNIT INVENTORY I 1 I I IX?ENIIONI ITKK D !:SO R I IBTI O N - QUM~TIT¥ NO. Amount Forwlrd UNIT :1 I:X?ENIION! ! I il INVENTORY Excenci~ Examine! by I' I ', I ,-' /~o.'- t!i!i t1'1 INV£NTORY ,~.,~,.~,.~.?~ ~:. £x~ended by I=x~mined b.v Entered by INVENTORY Priced by Extended by Examined by t I:f' I (,~"r (NSI ON$ ' J .~/~. ' 3~ I I1. f. 1.1.1[. I. I- " · · INVENTORY ,3 -/C' ,~.~..~ ' , E, zlenclecl by Called by ~i ~at~n II · ~.,,,,,,.~ ~. ~.,,,~ ~v ~ " ~1 IT~ ~ O~S~RIPTIO~ ~ ~TITY U~I~ ffNIC[ UNIT .~TNI~I [~ ,. ',,,, ~~ ~ / ~! I I' 'I' ,., .~-. ~,,_~/~ ~,--~ ~~~.,/~ . .....;'.-: .'..,. Ir ~ · I ·, ~I~/~ ~~. '~ J/ ~/ ~ '-[ ~I I'~.' 0.' .~--~ ~'~,r p~,._~ ~ ~.'~, ~/I/~ ~,.! ','i I' .l.-i.'-.'la~-~" ~.~/~ ~~~.,.~ ~ )/i/. i /~'1. i'. ~ i'~i '. ~', t i.'i,'.~' '" '~ ~~~ ~ ~-z,'~ ~-~' / i i -:i~'~] ~t' ~.~ -' ;..i i i~Z." '"' · -~ ~' . I . ',L- ", , , .,'~ i~1 ~,~,~ / /~ ERLE STANLEY GARDNER LIBRARY THE O.A. CALLS IT MURDER THE CASE OF THE MUSICAL COW MURDER UP MY SLEEVE THE CASE OF THE BACKWARD MULE THE O.A. BREAKS A SEAL THE D.A. GOES TO TRIAL UP FOR GRABS TRY ANYTHING ONCE TOP OF THE HEAP ALL GRASS ISNT GREEN THE CASE OF THE DARING DIVORCEE .RAPS NEED FRESH BAIT THE COUNT OF NINE PASS THE GRAVY CATS PROWL AT NIGHT WIDOWS WEAR WEEDS KEPT WOMEN CANT QUIT SHILLS CANT CASH CHIPS FISH OR CUT BAIT CUT THIN TO WIN CROWS CANT COUNT YOU CAN DIE LAUGNING SOME SLIPS DONT SHOW THE BIGGER THEY COME BEDROOMS HAVE WINDOWS TWO CLUES SOME WOMEN WONT WAIT BEWARE THE CURVES FOOLS DIE ON FRIOAY ~ . SAM HICKS INVENTORY HISTORICAL CENTER o t. ':-'~ ' "~ THE CASE OF THE GREEN EYED SISTER THE CASE OF THE GRINNING GORILLA BACHELORS GET LONELY THE CASE OF THE MOTH-EATON MINK THE CASE OF THE FUGITIVE MURSE THE CASE OF THE HISITANT HOSTESS THE CASE OF THE ANGRY MOURNER THE CASE OF THE RUNAWAY CORPSE THE CASE OF THE RESTLESS REDHEAD THE CASE OF THE GLAMOROUS GHOST THE CASE OF THE BLACK-EYED BLOND THE CASE OF THE HALF-WAKENED WIFE THE CASE OF THE ONE-EYED WITNESS THE CASE OF THE FIERY FINGERS THE CASE OF THE BAITED HOOK THE CASE OF THE CROOKED CANDLE THE CASE OF THE VAFABOND VIRGIN THE CASE OF THE FAN-DANCERS HORSE THE CASE OF THE LAZY LOVER THE CASE OF THE SILENT PARTNER THE CASE OF THE BORROWEO BRUNETTE THE CASE OF THE OUBIOUS BRIOEGROOM THE CASE OF THE NEGLIGENT NYMPH THE CASE OF THE CAUTIOUS COQUETTE THE CASE OF THE DEADLY TOY THE CASE OF THE HAUNTEO HUSBANC THE CASE OF THE OANGEROUS OOWAGER THE CASE OF THE AMOUROUS AUNT THr. CASE OF THE DAF. ING DIVORCEE HISTORICAL CENTER THE CASE OF THE STEPDAUGHTERS SECRET THE CASE OF THE ICE-COLD HANDS THE CASE OF THE MISCHIEVOUS DOLL THE CASE OF THE PHANTOM FORTUNE THE CASE OF THE BLONDE BONANZA THE CASE OF THE RELUCTANT MODEL THE CASE OF THE BIGAMOUS SPOUSE THE CASE OF THE TERRIFIED TYPIST THE CASE OF THE FOOT-LOOSE DOLL THE CASE OF THE DARING DECOY THE CASE OF THE CALENDAR GIRL THE CASE OF THE LONG-LEGGED MODELS THE CASE OF THE SPURIOUS SPINSTER HE CASE OF THE NERVOUS ACCOMPLICE THE CASE OF THE SUN BATHERS DIARY THE CASE OF THE SCREAMING WOMAN THE CASE OF THE DEMURE DEFENDANT THE CASE OF THE GILDED LILY THE CASE OF THE LUCKY LOSER THE CASE OF THE LONELY HEIRESS THE CASE OF THE SHAPELY SHADOW THE CASE OF THE SINGING SKIRT THE CASE OF THE WAYLAID WOLF THE CASE OF THE DUPLICATE DAUGHTER THE CASE OF THE SUBSTITUTE FACE THE CASE OF THE PERJURED PARROT THE CASE OF THE CURIOUS BRIDE THE CASE OF THE CARETAKERS CAT THE CASE OF THE ROLLING STONES THE CASE OF THE SHOPLIFTERS SHOE FHE CASE OF THE SLEEPWALKERS NIECE THE CASE OF THE FABULOUS FAKE THE CASE OF THE CRIMSON KISS THE CASE OF THE CRYING SWALLOW THE CASE OF THE 1RATE WITNESS THE CASE OF THE CARELESS CUPID THE CASE OF THE QUEENLY CONTESTANT THE CASE OF THE WORRIED WAITRESS THE CASE OF THE BEAUTIFUL BEGGER THE CASE OF THE HORRIFIED HEIRS THE CASE OF THE TROUBLED TRUSTER THE CASE OF THE HOWLING DOG THE CASE OF THE LUCKY LEGS THE CASE OF THE VELVET CLAWS THE CASE OF THE STUTTERING BISHOP THE CASE OF THE FENCED-IN WOMAN THE CASE OF THE POSTPONED MURDER THE D.A. CALLS A TURN THE D.A. BREAKS AN EGG THE D.A. HOLDS A CANDLE THE O.A. TA ES A CHANCE - THE COURT OF LAST RESORT THE CLEW OF THE FORGOTTEN MURDER THE CASE OF ERLE STANLEY GARDNER(Z) THE LAND OF SHORTER SHADOWS HUNTING THE DESERT WHALE HOVERING OVER BAJA OFF THE BEATEN TRACK IN BAJA THE HIDDEN HEART OF BAJA HOST WITH THE BIG HAT THE WORLD OF WATER HOVERXNG OVER BAJA GYPSY DAYS ON THE DELTA NEGHBORHOOD FRONTIERS HUNTING LOST MINES BY HELICOPTER TW~ ~T T~ Y~11~ MEXICOS MAGIC SQUARE COPS ON CAMPUS DESERT PLANTS AND PEOPLE HISTORICAL --1-BXOtlOCULAR$ ...-r-"F.- .'~ -'- "' ,.: ..... .--.--~,y ',j .,, ; .~ ~,. 6- INDIAN BASKETS BY" J.U/: :il ]ll~(.,'~'I'Imll~.~m~' '-_ -.,.,.--- ..- ..-,- .'i... ---;-'.'-'.~'=.=-.-~ .=LEAu ,a.t..i~_.'m~..~(~'d"iaYFE -(HUMAN HAI~R}~ ..- Z:'5O'iRTS~, ~.~( ~'/'~;.SS ......'..~.._~. Z-RAWHIDE RIETAS (..~ ("('~"""\", ~~ · '-~-;KdEs~HAIR LEAD HALTER""'""~i:)P~...- ~¥/ AND · · -'-l-OIL PAINTING."THEY PASSED THIS WAY" RALPH LOVE -,,,'1-PICTURE OF SAM HICKS ~ I/bUNG COWBOY :.'~'" LK'-2~THE VANISHING AMERICAN(COIN COLLECTION}--'~.~ f:~"~C. Cg~ENDATIONS, ETC:.~.~ ~'I-CHAIN BIT- -,., .t.-'- .... . , - PU " · .--1-FRAMED ARROW HEAD COLLECTION-ek's:'- '"-': '.'", 1-XXXX STETSON ~: ~;x,C-D ,.2-"2i "~,I-MEXICAN BRUSH PROTECTOR (HORSE)i'~ ~1-t6 BEAR TRAP f't: IO '"-~' ~ 1-MEXICAN METAL PICTURE(HAYAN?) J HISTORICAL CENTER - 12SKETCH, TONY ASNHAN ~."-' '"'; '": ~'& ;" ' 1~. Ah[ 6;~nDIl~a ,lIEEL ;~ · ' ~" . - ~.... ?" , t,~ OLD TOWN TEMECULA MUSEUM Located in Butterfield Square Monday, ~anuary 6, 1986 the Old Town Temec~la Museum received on loan ~he Temecula artifacts that vere purchased from the Bianchi Frontier Museum in January, 1985 by Overland Bank and Kaiser Development Co. ~x~xR~xg~x~gR~x~9~9~xxx.. The following items were purchased for $20,000. 1 es. 5' X 9' diorams of Temecula Townsite, 1915 '2 es. Vail Ranch Saddles 1 es. Vail Ranch bell 2 es. Vail RAnch horse collars 1 es. Vail RAnch "No Hunting' sign l& es. historical photo murals 1 ea. 20~ X 8! exhibit platform with electrical system 1 es. Antique showcase 1 es. ~nchester carbine 1 es. Col~ Single action Army revolver 1 Collection of Sam Hicks personal mementos 1 Collection of Erie Stanley GArdner personal emeorabilia 1 Collection of assorted Temecula memorabilia All of the aksxs itens above except for a few of the large murals and the Vail bell were moved into the museum Monday. The items are on loan pending the acquisition of a permanent museum site. On hand to over-see the move were members of the Museum Board of Directors, Curator, Tony Tobin, Allan McDonald of Overland Bank and Sherry.Prysock of Kaiser Development Co. ADO£NDUM Certain atticlie donated and/or outright girl tO the Frontier Muleurn Historical Center contained in thai Bill of Sale are being tranefarted ~ virtue of thai document. without charge. However, a nominal value hal been placed on the riotoration, Ireriga, inlurlnce, historical rolearch, lecurit¥, ~owcieing, and curator mrvicie during the time that the~ artifaet~ wore being maintained by the Frontier Museum HIRm'ical Center. Tl~y are herewith being trenlferred witi~ no value a~es~ed thereto for the actual artiole~ The Frontier Muleurn HiRorical Center herewith contributes ~¢on thousand 0ellars (~3,000) of U~is value to be deducted from the $23,000 valuation on the artifact~ thereby leaving a nat DlyaOle belinca of twenty Ulouland dollars ($20,000). Valuation~ are Ie foIlow~ Vail renoir laddie, owned by Mahlon Vail, with ~ and acceasories $ 1,500 Vail ranch ~acldle, wi~ stand and accessories $ 1,000 (both ~ldclles completely restored) Vail ranch bell, restored and mountre:! on a braa~walnut stand $ 1,000 Vail ranch "1~ Hunting" lign $ 50 Vail ranch hOf~e cellarl. restored and made into mirrors $ 500 halterJoel phOtO tourlie $ 1,590 antique ~/mwcase, 24#xg6"x40" $ 8CX) 20'x6' plitform, wooden, wiUt electrical system $ 600 5'x9' (fierime of Teme=ula Town~ita w/ enclosure and table mount $ 12,000 AI Rated alX~va, a nominal value ha~ been pieced on riotoration, etc. of itema no liltoil in U~I I~ova valueSlone $ 3,960 Gro~ valuation S 23,000 Contril~Jtion (3,000) Net valuation The following items are alerailed for riferenee pUrlX~el only and no._.~.t es a part of this sale RatemenS valueSJun: Collection of Sam Hlcke i~r~ona; roemonroe Collection of Earle Stanley Gardner memento~ Miecellenecul Temeoul& memoratHle celt S;A.A. revolver & Wincheater carbine $ 2.000 $ 5,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 BILL OF SALE TM ma~agned. Frofitter Museum Historical Center, Temecul&. California I el. I 14 I el. 1 1am. I I 1 1 (~1~ C)evelooment ~omGany, Tamecull, California S'xG° diotima of Tamecull Townsite w/plutic enclomJre and table mount V&il Ratch sedclleS Vail Ranch I:~11' Vail I~h I~orse collars Vail Rinch ~4o Hunting" sign hiatorical photo murals 20' x 8' wooden exhibit platfo,-m with electrical system 24"xg~'x44~ antk3ue ahowcm Colt SinGle Action Army revolver, .4.~. ? I/2" IX)l, uelcl on Viii I~anch collection of Sam Hicks I~raonal mementc~ collection of Earle Stanley Gardener ~raonal memorabilia cOllEction of a~ortEKI Temecula memorabilia For a total value of S23,000 (see Addendum on 'liXll lilt value S20,000 reverse s ida ) Ww~ 23rd dayd Jamtory .mmeyu t9~. John lffaldly lulwn tl al Ill H IIm # 1hi tell d 11Wllca17 IvldleU) II # the Pillar.. m~Sl haiN_ 2 ~i~ to IN TEMECULA MUSEUM ACCOUNT ACTIVITY 1990 BALANCES CD ACCOUNTS #221525 ,.1'an Feb Mar May 3un 3u! Aug Oct Nov Dec 1 , 000 [, 000 1,000 i ,000 i, 000 I ,000 I, 000 1,000 I, 000 1,000 I ,000 [ ,000 REGULAR SAVINGS #1442293S #221781 Interest Oep. Transfers Out 3un Interest Dep. Interest Dep. Deposit from Savings Dec Interest Dep. Deposit from Savings 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 BUILDING FUND #14433677 12/31/89 Bal. 5,147.42 Mar Interest Oep. Donation Dep. Transfer Out 3un Interest. Oep. Transfer Out Sap Intereat Dep. Dec Interest Dep. Regular Dep. 258.45 5,405.87 (1,500.00) 3,905.87 284.02 4,[89.89 229.49 4,419.38 1,728.00 6,147.38 e2.se 6,229.96 XO0.00 6,329.96 12,31,89 Bal. 8,065.82 104.10 500.00 (6,000.00 23.75 (1,ooo.oo 22.56 25.89 500.00 8,169.92 8,669.92 2,669.92 2,693.67 1,693.67 1,716.23 1,742.12 2,242.12 Indicates balances Ln accounts as of 12/31/91 TEMECULA MUSEUM [991 BUDGET EXPENSE: FACILITIES Rant Utilities Telaphona CHURCH BUILDING Moving Soil Tasts Foundation Masonry Enginaaring Dumstar Painting OPERATING Postage P.O. Box Rant Printing Photo Copias Insuranca Racording Sarvicas Bob Taylor Maps BLue Prints Filing Faas Storaga Rant TVCC Duas Trophias Signs Vacuum Rapairs TAXES Stats Sales Tax State Corp. Tax iR$ Tax Return FUND RAISING Rod Rally Balloon/Wins Fastival Spirit of Temacula C,C.S, Fae C.C.S. Support MISCELLANEOUS Out of Pockat Reimb. Actual 7,200 750 371 2,125 144 2,030 3,285 800 309 192 345 31 49 28 213 14 1,493 41 190 227 15 24 280 82 128 72 8 481 233 26 9 160 100 666 7,500 I ,071 73 1991 Budgat 7.200 750 370 400 300 180 150 60 28 200 15 500 200 15 90 125 200 183 25 Total 30,765 11,991 TEMECULA MUSEUM 1991 BUDGET INCOME: At Museum Sales Donations Other Sales Spirit of Temecula Doll House Raffle Rummage Sale Other Donations Roripaugh Maldonado Lioness American Media Calif. Comm. Foundation John Burnham Anonymous Total Income Total Expense Cash Flow 1990 Actual $ 2,706 3,355 2,000 944 1,200 500 100 500 9O0 1,000 1,260 1,500 15,965 30 , 765 ('24 ,SO0 ) 1991 Budget 3 , 000 4,000 5 , 000 12,000 11,991 9 1. Need to increase museum sales by 10 ~ 2. Need to increase museum jar donations by 3. Need $5,000 fund raiser to balance budget OLD TOWN TEMECULA MUSEUM ACTUAL VS BUDGET JAN. 1991 INCOME This Month Bud At Museum: Sales Donations Ytd Act Other: Sub Donations 474 250 474 284 333 284 EXPENSE Total 768 583 768 Facilities: Rent Utilities Telephone Church: Total Engineering Fencing Dumpster Porta Pottles Operating: Postage P.O. Box Rent Printing Photo Copiss I niurance Taylor Maps Stationery TVCC Duss Trophiss Party Sulpplies Stats Sales Stats Corp. 600 68 6 50 739 183 600 31 25 183 Taxes: 178 Total 1824 Unbudgeted: 600 68 6 50 739 183 178 1824 Annual Bud 3000 4000 7000 5000 12000 7200 750 370 400 300 1BO 150 60 38 200 15 1500 200 15 90 125 200 183 25 11991 Income Expense Variance 768 1824 (lOSe) 768 1824 (lOSe) 12000 11991 OLD TOWN TEMECULA MUSEUM ACTUAL VS BUDGET Feb. 1991 INCOME This Month Ytd Annual Act Bud Act Bud At Museum: Sales Donations 436 250 910 3000 564 333 858 4000 Total 1000 583 1768 7000 291 291 5000 Total 1291 1291 12000 Other: Sub Donations EXPENSE Facilities: Rent Utilities Telephone Church: Engineering Fencing Dumpstar Porte Potties Operating: Postage P.O. Box Rent Printing Photo Copies Insurance Taylor Maps Stationery TVCC Dues Trophies Party Suipplies Taxes: State Sales State Corp. 600 600 1200 7200 50 62 118 750 19 31 25 370 25 180 20 739 90 25 180 Unbudgeted: 46 Total 1030 75 180 20 739 9O 183 224 2854 400 300 180 150 60 38 200 15 1500 200 15' 90 125 200 183 25 1991 Income Expense Variance 1291 1030 261 2059 2854 (795) 12000 11991 9 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM Amount Requested $25,000 _ Project Starting Date: NOVEHBI~R 25~-}990 Project Ending Date: JUNE 1. 199_1 ORGANIZATION'S BACKGROUND: Name of Organization TE~IECULA MUSEU~I Mailing address P.O. BOX 792 Telephone number 676-0021 (PRES_]:DENT: 676--0322) Number of paid staff none Number of volu~tteer hours cuntribt,ied in past year Geographic area(s) served Yearfounded 1985 Number of volunteers 50 + or - 1,2OO to 1,see:DO CENTS AND BOARD MF~BERS TF~!ECULA VALLEY AND TOURISTS --~ Is this organizatio~t incorporated i~t California as a non-profit organization? Yes X He If 'yes": Date of i~lcorporatio~ us a non-profit JANUARY, 1987 Federal identilication ~umber 33-0152755 State identificatim~ number 1.588966 If "no": Name of sponsoring ulganization Its federal identification number Its state identification number This application has been authorized by the organization's: Executive Committee Board ol Directors Members-at-large FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Based on your organization's last fiscal year) ,COME EXPENSES Fundraising $ 22,873 Salaries $ 0 Foundation grants $ 0 Operating expenses $ 11.899 United Way $ 0 Community services $ 0 Government funds $ 0 Amount sent to $ 0 national/parent organization $ Other expenses $ Other sources $ 4,641 SOUVENIR SALES AND BANK INTEREST 7,614~ Please note with an asterisk any numbers you think require additional explanation, and comment on these items.. COST OF MOVING ST. CATHERINE'S CHURCH FROM FRONT STREET TO PRESENT LOCATION AT SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK In addition, please attach the organization's most recent treasurer's report or financial statement. (It does not require a CPA's audit, but please submit if available.} Your Organization's Mission: Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. OUR IMMEDIATE GOAL IS TO RESTORE AND REHABILITATE THE CHURCH FOR USE BY THE MUSEUM, THE PUBL. AND THE CII~I OF TEMECULA. AT THE SAME TIME, WE SHALL INTRODUCE PROGRAMS WITHIN THIS CHURCH WHICH WII.I. IDENTIFY IT FOR TH£ CO~.{UNITY AS A MINI-MUSEUM. FORERUNNER TO A LARGER ONE. THERE3 ENCOURAGING AN AWARENESS OF OUR PAST. WE SHALL EXPLORE TIlE FEASIBILITY OF WORKING WITH THE CITY TO OFFER JOINTLY MEETING SPACE FOR SMALL GROUPS SUCH AS SCOUTS. MUSIC PERFORMANCE. ART FYWTRTI'~ ~.VF.N U~nnTNr:.~ &.cO A RFLc[111.?, 'T~!F. RF.C;TC)REn ~TRHCT!JR~. VT].L RI~. A ~nIIRD..E OF TNC(~!~ TI') COVER OP£RATING COSTS AS WELL AS PROVIDING A START-UP FUND FOR THE FIJTIJRE MATN-MUSEUM STRUCT Tf't RF. RIITT.T F. VFNTllAI.I.Y AI~.IACF. NT TO THF. (~HIIRCH-HTNT--H!I.~F.I~M. OITR t.ON~-TF. RM C4')AI. ~Hn!!t.i) RF. FMP RTZED -- NAMF. I.Y. TO BUTt.D A Nk'~/ MUSEUM FACTT.ITY AT THE SAM HICKS PAR[ WITH AMP!.E SPAC£ AND ':-TAFF FOP, GROWTH AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROFESSIONAL MUSEUM PROGRAM WHICH WILL EXTEND ITS ,<ESOURCES INTO THE COHIdUNITY, 'ESPECIALLY AS AN OFFERING FOR SCIIOOLS AND THE YOUTH OF TDIECUL ~ JM-AI! Accounts ALL ACCOUNTS -As of 11/19/90 Account 11/19/90 Balance ASSETS Cash and Bank Accounts OX0109925-CHECKING 221525-CD 227181-C0 BUILDING FUND-14433677 REG SAVINGS-14422935 Total Cash and Bank Accounts TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES OVERALL TOTAL 4,053.75 I, 000. O0 3,819.14 I ,716.23 6,247 16,836.50 16,836.50 0.00 16,836.50 Pat MUSEUM-All 11/25/90 Accounts SUMMARY REPORT 8/20/90 Through 11/19/90 Category Description INCOME/EXPENSE INCOME CD221525 DONATIONS FUNDRAISER OTHER INCOME REFUND 8/20/90- 11/19/90 105.85 265.00 1,728.00 1,372.50 59.00 TOTAL INCOME 3,530.35 EXPENSES BANK CHARGE 10.00 COST OF FUNDRASING 4,499.84 LEGAL & PROF. FEES 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 50.00 PHONE AT MUSEUM 135.85 POSTAGE 36.75 RENT FOR MUSEUM 2,400.00 RENT PAID OTHER 145.89 TAXES 6.00 UTILITIES 322.10 Expenses - Other 0.00 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,647.43 Pege TOTAL INCOME/EXPENSE -4,117.08 TRANSFERS TO 010109925 -6,180.86 FROM 227181 6,180.86 TOTAL TRANSFERS 0.00 BALANCE FORWARD BUILDING FUND 22.56 TOTAL BALANCE FORWARD 22.56 OVERALL TOTAL -4,094.52 MU~=uM-AII Accounts 11/25/90 PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT 8/ 1/90 Through 11/30/90 Category Description INCOME/EXPENSE INCOME C.D. LOAN CD221525 DONATIONS FUNDRAISER INTEREST FROM CD MAP SALES OTHER INCOME REFUND TOTAL INCOME EXPENSES BANK CHARGE BUILDING COST COST OF FUNDRASING LEGAL & PROF. FEES MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE OFFICE EXPENSES OUT OF SPACE STORAGE PHONE AT MUSEUM POSTAGE RENT FOR MUSEUM RENT PAID OTHER REPAIRS TAXES UTILITIES VOLUNTEERS Expenses - Other TOTAL EXPENSES 8/ 1/90- 11/30/90 3,700.00 105.85 602.50 1,728.00 61.82 800.00 1,372.50 59.00 8,429.67 10.00 2S.00 8,471.97 41.00 50.00 85.10 90.00 135.85 38.75 2,400.00 145.89 7.50 6.00 322.10 6.99 0.00 11,836.15 TOTAL INCOME/EXPENSE Page I Project{s) needing award funding · ./w will your organization use any fu~ding awarded;' Give the project's objectives, number of persons served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any equipment or services that the award .coffey would purchase aftd why it is needed. Please include a detailed budget and a schedule of signilica.t activities related to this project. Please attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of i~lormatiofl i~ you need to expand your answer beyond this space. 1. R~RE AND R~ABIL[TATE ~E ~NATED CHURCH, ADDING H~T, ~R, R~TR~S. 2. R~TAL OF ~E FACIL~ ~I~ PROVIDE A SOURCE OF ~NDS ~R ~E S~OND PHASE OF OUR ~ASTER P~N, N~.I~Y, A ~LLY EQUIPPED ~SEUH ADJACENT ~ ~E R~RED ~URCH. 3. AS ~ WORK AS CAN BE ~NE BY VOLU~EERS WILL BE ~NE IN ~IS WAY. H~EVER, A CONSTRUeION SUPERVISOR IS NEEDED FOR ~JOR WORK. 4. ~ SHALL ~LIST COUNTY AND STATE ~SE~ ~NSULTAN~ ~ INITIATE AN OVER-ALL SCHEDULE FOR EVALUATING AND ~TE~RIZING OUR PR~ENT ~T~SIVE HOLDINGS, A~AL WORK ~ BE ~NE BY VOL~RS A~ER PROPER TRAINING. 5. GRADUA~ S~D~ AT ~E UNIVERSI~ OF CALI~RNIA SPECIALIZING IN R~ATED FINDS SU~ AS HIS~RY, AR~EOL~Y AND ART, WILL BE AVAILABLE ~ US AT N~INAL FE~. 6. WE ANTICIPATE ~AT MUSEUM-S~NORED PR~RAMS EVEN IN ~E S~ CHURCH FACILITY WILL ~CATE lief. ~E LARGER EFFORT. ~ {Sign both if same) (Signature aud title ol individual prepari{~g application form) AND (Signature of~d title of I=Yesident or Authorized Officer) THE TEMECULA NUSEUM P.O. BOX 792, T]~, (Organization Name) CALIFORNIA, 92390. (Address of Organizerio.) 676-0021 (President: Becca Nakaya, 676-0322) (Telephone) 14eVeL~b-_t ~0, 1990 {Date) Return Completed Application to: Community Service Funding Program City of Tamecola 43172 Business Park Drive Temecule, California 92390 PAGE 3. ~ continuation THE CITY OF TENECULA IN WHICH OVER 90% OF ITS BUILT ENVIRONMENT IS LATE TWENIETH CENTURY NEEDS A SERIOUS REMINDER OF ITS PAST w A REMINDER OF HOW OUR EARLIEST SETTLERS LIVED, WORKED, REUOICED. THE FORMAL BEGINNINGS OF OUR MUSEUM WAS IN 1985 IN A SMALL DONATED STOREFRONT SPACE WITH HOLDINGS AND ARTIFACTS COLLECTED OVER MANY DECADES. DECEMDENTS OF EARLY TENECULA VALLEY F~NILIES AND OTHER LOCAL RESIDENTS HAVE DONATED PERSONAL WESTERN COLLECTIONS AS WELL AS LOCAL INDIAN ARTIFACTS, PROVIDING US WITH A UNIQUE GLIMPSE OF THE PIONEER SPIRIT AND LIFESTYLE THAT WAS. NOW WE ARE READY FOR THE NEXT STEP--BEGINNING APPROPRIATELY WITH THE RESTORATION OF A TENECULA LANDMARK, THE ST. CATHERINE'S CHURCH BUILT IN 1920 AND MOVED FROM ITS ORIGINAL SITE AT 6th AND FRONT STREETS IN 1989 TO THE SAN HICk. MONUMENT PARK. SERIOUS RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION HAS BEGUN, BUT WE ARE HINDERED BY THE FACT THAT VOLUNTEER EN~IUSIASN AND HARD WORK ARE NO LONGER ENOUGH. THE FULFILLMENT OF NUMEROUS BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS THE DF~IANDS OF ACCURATE HISTORICAL RESTORATION REQUIRE FUNDS. WE SHALL NEED TO HIRE A CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE WORK THAT WILL MAKE THE CHURCH USEFUL NOT ONLY TO THE MUSEUM BUT ALSOTOT HE EXTENDED C~NITY FOR WHICH WE ENVISION MULTIPLE USES. IT IS FOR THIS T~AT WE ARE REQUESTING HELP FROM THE CITY OF TENECULA. The any TIE I[11T-111 CliPlit PItiEel: TEIECILI IlSEll 'C!IICI IESTIlIT[11' Plff2 CIISTIICTIII till IIlIllIIB SISTEl lift: l]-hc-# Ill!SIll BIGEl PIEPI!IHII Fill Ill!IT STIlt litE: lCCTI lift TlTIL ClllC! KII 1 PLtl ! PLII ] FLil I PLll 5 PLII l FLU 7 PlliECT Sl FT: 2,111 1,171 I ! I I I I I flit St FT: 1,171 I I I I I I I FT. nilE! IF gllT~ I I I I I I I I I '11111[CI CYSTS ' 2111 ilYE!llEIT FEES: 2112 lll[llTltl 2202 ISSESSI[IT 2111 IIII PtEIZIIS 21It IllLIlts PE!lZT 211S City 211t CIlBITIIlIL IS[ 21e7 ffPl. IF I.E. 2111 ELECTBZClTT 21n ~tE me FLlll CIITllLi!!&llAff ll] LIftSCItE FEES 21!1 Pitt FEES 22:5 PLII CLEO[ 2227 SmOL FEES 222! SEI~! PLAIT FE~S , 2ZZI STEET 2222 TELlheRE 2122 T!ICT lip 222~ TIIFFIC $IBIL 2124 ITILITT FE[SII~nSTTS 2225 ItlFll FEES 222i filFli llSPECTIII 2227 lETEl FEES/IETEIS 2128 IZSC[LLIIEIIS FEES 2Stl ITIE! Jill!let ~IST$: 2ill III. CIITI#[ICt TIIISFEI lfi2 IllflEet CIITIfiEICt: TITIL lfi~![CT I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I 751 I I I t :'L I I I I I.. I I I I '"' I""1 I I I t I I I I I I' I I O I I I I I I -I I I !fi I t I I I I I ~.. I I I I 1. I I 151 I I I I 1,12~ I I I I 2,!~1 ! I J I I I I I I O J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I 'l I ! t I I ,' I I I I .-.-; t I I .....-t',. ,~ · I I '..1' .- I I I,' I I I"""~" I I I '"' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11JIS 11J15 11 II 11 II It II It Tff[ Ill!Nil Cel!11! ~!O:[CT: TEi.~,i IgSEOI 'Ce:lCX IESTO!ITIII' Pile I 'FAL C.qU!:! ~LAI: !L.: PL." ! !LAI 4 Pill ~, Pt&! [ ?',AI ? !'3)(I I~ ~'~; ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I I I ', COSTS ' The any !BE !(lIT-Ill CWIt! Pa~ECT: :EI(C:LI IUS(UI 'C!:IC] 1(STOlI[[01'FIG[ ] CffSllI,T,.I ::i! !,ll,,I.h StST[I .A,[: llft TSTA~ !e;JS~ ~illl P:Af2 ~lil)PLII 4 PLAk ~ !141 ~ ?LAI ? III1(I IF UIIT$; t t ~ J O O 0 J ' SITE !|!l ' T~( !EST!IilIICff~LL ]2:! ~2C~ .... J..~,l:!~ JILL! .l..ll,ll "'" ~,,, SI!:TI!! :~i~ . ., .... :.: CL(Ali~T$ :::~ y"i The any '!~ !IllNIl ClIPlIT F!OI[CT: T[I[CtU If|Ill 'CIIIIC! IESTIIATTII' PI~IECT SI ~T: 1,170 ~,:7~ 9 9 I I I I O ~I:T SQ FT: :,:71 I I I O O : )412 II TtACT diES TIE [I 311) LITEII3/EITEIT!01S ]4el PIESS:E~ IEIILATOIS ~'it '!'t'iil llt'is )T~! ',~ ..... Ai!.,L,SAI.LS ]SJ: $T![~T !Ills ~, ......, ..... 675 675 125 T25 ~pq I ! The ~'~r~."~l~'~'mp any ~i qlH,'n' ;[l['.~i[P :115TIICTZII LOll IlfiTII:IG. ~iT[: 41M TEII~T[ COlTIlL !lid [fiD:l[ (IlS]T[}: TIEIC~TH ::!::L !::' ":' 1:32 An:!S IH4 ~EiI!!S/lilTELS 4145 STIIEll!IIEITI! The p any :01ST!OCTIOl LOft IOI!TO!111 $!STEI P!~[:T: TIlECULl IU$~U! '~!11C! ![STOIAT[01' PGE [ mill [~ !:~ IETILS: [{AIIS/IAILS 111JI[ITiL llli[ [!l[ItKll IETIL l[[llli I[TlL FIUII[ SiS?IlS i:?i '"~ ' :.. ,Ul{[!: .... , ':'lq¢l/tlC"l' i~:i .....i! ~~iie :.' I::: ~"'~: ...... $:1.o. 421] :~STll Ill:l:ll S[!-TITIL Cll!CI ~lil IILtl 2 tLll ]lLtl I FLll 5 ~Lltt Pill 7 , ,7, I I I O " I O .................................................................. II $0 II tO I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I 0 I !,ill t I : I C I I I I I I I I l I I I I lO I: II II ~"~"* TElEXIll IlSEft ':!11Cl I[$TIIIT:01' PAlE 7 Ill[IT STILT liTE: .; ....:115T!gCTIIr 1251 IllSj~!llTillllL PIlIECT:-. II 11 11 II II to 11 II II 4]5] !1I~11i t,~il 42fl SREIT IITIL 441 IIII I I I I I I ,, ,,,,,,,,.,,,~ .,. , , , , , , , , ,,, ,,,,,~, ~] -, , , , , , , , fill liltS, IlliriS I ILIS$:' 1III I I I I fill tllt$/Fllll$ I I. I I I I I I I I]12 sFECIIL 10115 I I I I I I I I I ,., '"t r~ ]:: li:: ~r ',: ..... O. 1.. &.,; :::iS ~ · , · . .. · I]~t '""" Lift l,fil list d.E lIB I I I I I I I I I ,,. CI~ITEI$ I I I I I I I I I 11~1 MIKtlIIIILE I I I I I I I I I l]l! MIIIIIITILE /~1 7TI I I I I I I I I11~ MI!I!ilIIITL I I I I I I I I I l)i] FLIIl[lilIIII )JII t,Zll I I I I I I I flit lillETIll I I I I I I I I I tilt ~l:lTTli I,[11 1,$11 I I I I I I qil I1~ filEliB I I I I I I I I I The any TIE !lilT-Ill IETELIPIEIT CIIPiI! CIIST!g~TIII 311RlITIlIfi ITSTEl PIIIECh TEIECULI IlSEft 'CIIICI IES;IllTIII° lATE: 1]-hc'H IIIlllll lUllIT PEIPIITIII FIll IlllET STILT lITE: I)-Jil-ll ICCTI fill IfiiET tltll C!111l PLII 1 Pttl 2 IIZt $1 FT: 1,171 I I IIIIEI OF SliTS: I ! I I 'll!lIT CIIST!ICT[IrCIililIll. It- SPEC:A~TIES: II fi l! $! 4411 IITI Ill[IS!ICES Ifi 4y I I Ill] ClIPtITS I I I till lilIcTIIIES/SIIIS 8 I I I 1411 [IT!! flTl ,~ I I I riOS ~TIE EITIlilIS![IS ]]1 '~.-HI. I I · I I I lift llll[l$1tllts I /.. 1417 IAI{ IllEl I '""' I I 4111 !11f !ITCIlS I I I I ":l ", "v ~v~':~ ' ' ' .I.,:. l .I I~22 St{CitE liliES{ lilts I I I l 4f2~ ll, [li,l,ll, ILliS, I I I 4!27 I.:IL lgILXIi S!$T[IS I I I 4~50 ClliE!lll $llT[IS; I I ISIl ELllITII$ I I I I fill IRIIlIIIL: I I I I 4111 KIllIll LITfIlls I I I I till Kiliill IlSTEl l,l 1,511 I I let! ItEltill [tillIll 15l IS1 I l Ifil Itlllllllll I I I l Efts SILll Ill lIT[l I I I I PLII ] KII 4 FLtl S PLll i PLtl 7 I I I I 1 I I I O I I I I I I II I I I I TR[ I[!IHII I[I[LIPIEIT {11PII! COISTlICTIII Llll IIl[TOtIll STST[I , IIIIECT: TEIEC]LI li$[11 'ClfflC! IESTOilfIOI' lAtE: l]-e.'fi ,:,, fill IUIGET PillfiT gilt SG !filE! 'IlllIT IlfiTIII1111' Ifil ['ZT!Illl: llft : .... iI.l[ c:: .. ill] ~t14 !il7 lift 411l 41ll $i!-?ITtL ll,111 ll,111 II 11 II II 11 II II The p an y Ill IEIIT-111 IEIELIPIEIT CliPlIT CIISTIICTlll Lift IIlITIIilG ITSTEl Ifilfi[I IllGiT PEIPII~111 ACCTI IAI[ IriSIT T~TIL ,~,~ PIO,,,T SQ FI: flit SIFT: filE! Of UlI!S: 'ITIECT CIISTIICF~01' COITZIO[I (?QI Igitg[ItlSlPEttiSIIl: 4701 CC[!ICIL 1,Ill I?e2 E~,.PI.IT EI:IL LIfT 471lPIllEel $1lE SiGI 151 lil ~717SlPP;:iSI~IIIIIIG SITE ~ t 4711PIOIECT fiBEIllTEII[I! I I!:!ASSISTfiT $g~[llllEIg[11 I 472:C~STOI SEllliE [EIL I 4721I!1[! Cilll: I I ifilCllllICTII fil!lll: l,SI IfilCIIT!ICTII ~tlfll: i,ll] t,71] tillIll. Clllllr~lCl llIISF[! I I IfilCfilTIICllll CIITIlGEICF: I I lit]Eel: TEl[COLA IlSEll 'CIIICI IESlllillll° liTE: l]-hc-fi PIG[ lB l,l?l O 0 i O I I I I I I 3 : I I I I I I I I I II1,121 Ill,21!I[ II II II II II II liT,i?7 liE,IT?II II li TO II II The TIE NilIT III i|T|~11|l~ ~IltlF! CIISTIICTIll Lfil III]Tlllli STSTEI DATE: file ............... o :~11~1 lib :~,STS ' JllJll;[ II;IT[IIICE ,lift I111flii ~!11I II11:I fETE! Illlllllll[111 Ifil Ell IllIll I1[1 II[IITIlI: Illfill It II I~ II ,!Tli "'"' Alii I: I: l: II I: l: I: I: l: ............. dl IFI~T:I',K SFIT[I lt!~ECT: TEIEClLt IItEgl 'EH:IC! IESTI!iTTOI'Pfi[ 22 !ATE: []-hc'!l IS] IfilOIEI tOlKT PIEPIIA[ZII FOil ~CE? STilT PtC[CT St FT: 1,;7:) ,,17, 9 , 0 0 ~ ~ Itllt!l OF ~I',;S; : ! 0 I 0 I I I i21] 1215 EItIIZTS/ES~LUS &217 IEISFIF[! ...... : ,.~ ..... .... ~...~ ;BilLEt L.tS/...,i! ALl!IS DEClIITII FEES EICESS ILI;, ClST EXCESS LII~$CIP[ t11[ :';!.::'A: PlllECh I[I[HLI IlSill 'ClIICI !ffTlllTlll'Pile H IH ....dl mffT PlEPIIITIII qll liBfiT STilT lifE: I]-hPll ACCTI lift TITIL C!11Cl Ptll 1 PLII ! PLAI ) Pill 4 FLII S PLII I Ptll 7 P!IJffT Sq FT: 1,170 Lt71 ! I I O I ! lilt $I FT: l,lTI I I I I I I I IHI[! IF glI~S: I I I I I I I I I ' IIIIETlli I:fiTS ' lOIUIJI It12 !qlIUIJ/IILL FIllS1 / ill] I~Lll[ S[ITIC[ '" ICt PLIIT$ 14li flITILS ill7 SE£111T! fill SIllS ill! Illl tHI Ill[! IIlIET[I{ HITS: iHI' HIeS CI$~11E! ' I. h,, .H![!'S IlllJll! {l~: I111[[[1[ :OlTTI[[ICT: II II II II II 11 tl tl II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d' I I I I I I I I ~1 I I I I I I I ', , I ! I I I I I I .I I 0 I I I I I ' I I : 0 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ~ ! I I I I The ~'~*:'",~'"~m p any TO[ ![11?-III I[I[LOPI[I[ C~lST!~:llOI LOll IO!lTfflll lie !11! It IllIll I~ gilTS: t I ! I I I I '!!IllIll[ :fiTS ' 7:~0 CL:I[li II$1115[EITI: 7!12 Ellill/TITLE f[[S 72~! Ill[TIl[I; F[[ ?i;~ ',',c ..... · .:..,t ~ q The: MAI'111~ ClllAirrlldffN IN ILIILDII~ . I,,,,! lilT~!ITIOI' Pli[ I5 JOliET STilT liTE: l]-la:-~l I!~'~ IlL ::!~:l;!!.i! !IUi~[I !!~: !11il!il COl, lhdCl. II II II I~ II II II II The n p any Tit lillE-Ill e[fEtlPl[II ClIPlIT CIISIIICIIII Llil IlllTIl[11 STST[I PIIIECT: TEIECILI IlSEll 'C!11Cl IESTIlIIIII' Ig[: []'itC'el Pile 11 IS! IlIIOI[! lielET PlEPlllllII Fill IlllET STilT lITE: IJ.Jal-I! ICCTI Ill[ TOTAL PIIJECT Sl FT: 1,171 IIIl SIFT: lillE! IF lilTS: 'Ltll ElF[IS[ ' ~" Ifil illl · .."- Ifil CIITIII[IT Lift ~" Ill2 tElL [STILE TIllS Alii TITLE t [SCIII lllI CIIlIfilIIS Ifil liT. CIlIIlI[ICT TlllSFE! fill lIT[lEST CIITIlIEICT: C!11CI Pill I PLil 2 1,Ill I I l,lll I I I I I ILll ] PLII I PLll S PLd I Pill 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IOTIL Llll Ell[IS[ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~.~. Ii I I , I , , , .. I I I I I I I ~'.~L I I I I I I I ~.-'"..~'_ , ' ' I I I ' II 'l '"' :11 II II II 11 II II .The any Tll I!11HII I!IELIPI[II CliPill CIISTIICTIIl Lilt IIlIllllli S/SIll PIIJECT: TElllILt IlSEli 'CIOICI IESTIlITllI'Plil El lITE: IS1 IIIIIIE! IllSIT IEPAIIITII FIll sTIlT IlI[: ICCTI IIll llTIL ClIICl PLII 1 Ptil 2 PLII l PLll I PLll 5 PIll I PLII 7 PitJilt St fT: 1,171 1,171 I t I I I I I Illi Sl FT: 1,171 I I I I I I I IllIll IF IlI!I~... ! ! I I I I I I I 'TITIL ElfIllS' 11111 SILLS lllll SILls PIIc[/SI. FT. llll! lIlT SItIS PIlE 11111 ll[11LIt PIllIlls 11114 SILl IF lITIllS TITIL IfSEllIS ,,J' I I I I I I I I '~1 ... I I I I I I I I ~1' I I I I I I I I ' IlllL I[I[[IPI[!I lISTS TIIIL lIElIlT ' SISAL sITE lilt' TITIl tIllIT CIIStlICTlll TITIL lItEIt IIllI[iI/SIP[111SIII !IFIL CIIIII Illl ' TOTIL lIllETIll COSTS ' TlllL FTliI:[li COSTS ', TOTIL lITE![ST TIP[iS[ TOTAL CAll liP[iS[ ' ' TITIL CIITIlIEICZIs ' SIll IETILIPIIIT Clllllt[IlT; Ifil IDIEIT clltlliillT: 1111 SIT[1111 Ifil ClISTIKTlll CIITIItllCT: 5lll LIIISClPI CllTlllllCY: 1111 lillEIlK lllTllf[ICt: Ifil till lIsTs clII]IElIT: loll litEliST COltflAil!T: .tilt LIII elITEll[IlS: 1,711 1,711 I I I I I I I 7,11S 7,175 I I ;. I I I I I 15,5111S,Sil I I t I I I 1 51,fil51,15t I I I I I I I 15,211IS,21] I I I'' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , ',.,1 I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I' I ., I I I I I I I I ..l ."1 I $fi,111 112,tli # II II # $1 ~ II II ILl #.11 #,11 #,11 #,11 11.N fl.# #,N I1,11 II,N I1,11 I1,11 I1.11 #,N #.11 I1,11 #,N I1,11 #.11 #.11 #.11 II.N ILl #.N #.1t #,fi #.11 #.11 #.11 #,11 #.11 I1.11 #.11 #.fi #.N I1.11 #.l #.11 #.# #.11 #.11 #.l #.tl fiji #.11 I1.11 #.11 I1.11 #.11 #.l I1,11 fl.# II,fi I1.11 I1.11 PAl #,N #.N #.N #.N #.11 l!.11 #,11 I1.11 #.11 II.ll I1.11 #.11 I1.11 11.12 II.fi #.11 II.fi ll.fi SIAl #.11 fiji I1.11 11.fi #.11 11.# I1.11 I1.11It.II #.11 I1,11 I1.~1 I1.11 #.11 StIlL IllElliS LESS CIITIIEICES lfi,tl5.1I ¥[NTtJI~A COJJNTY OirFIC[ CAId AI~ IL t.O. CAI. iFO~NIA (eOS) Ms. Nancy J. Maurice Maurice Printers 4232? Rio Nedo Street, Suite B Temecula, California 92390 Re: Sam Hicks Park Dear Nancy: Enclosed please find the Grant Deed and Declaration of Restrictions for Sam Hicks Monument Park, along with the Museum Lease. Wi~h the addition of the legal description you sent me, ~he documents are now ready to be signed. The reference to San Diego County is correct; it is consistent with the Title Report (enclosed). It is my understanding that this portion of Riverside County was once in San Diego County. We now can go ahead and finalize the documents. June Greek will be calling you to arrange for signature of the deeds. It has been a pleasure working with you on this project. Please feel free to call me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Scott F. Field City Attorney CITY OFTEMECULA sff/LTR16S431:m Enclosures Doug Stewart June Greek Shawn Nelson Becca Nakaya sff/DED114757 (120790) EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CORPORATION GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SAM RICKS MONUMENT PARK POUND&TZON, a non-profit corporation, a corporation organized under the laws'of the State of California, hereby grants to the CITY OP TEMECUI~, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This conveyance is made subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in that certain Agreement, executed by dated . , 19... , and recorded on Official Records of Riverside County, California and upon condition that said property be used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes. If said property is not used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes, then Grantor or its assigns, and successors, without paying any compensation for any buildings or other improvements or betterments that may then be upon said premises, and without making any compensation or incurring any liability for damages or losses or any kind, shall have the power to terminate all right, title, and interest in the property granted by this deed to Grantee and its successors and assigns, in the manner provided by law for the exercise of this power of termination, and shall thereupon have and enjoy forever all property granted by this deed, as if this conveyance -1- ~_ff/DEDl14757 (120790) had not been made. Grantee, its assigns or successors, shall thereupon immediately surrender possession of said property, and shall forfeit all rights thereto as required hereunder. Provided, however, that Grantor may not exercise this power to terminate unless, within ninety (90) days after the breach of the use restriction, written notice is given to the Grantee of the breach, and Grantee fails to correct the breach within ninety (90) days after receiving notice of the breach of the use restriction. Executed on , 19 , at , California. Mail tax statements as directed above. &CKNOILEDGMENT State of California County of Riverside On this day of , in the year 19 , before me, , a notary public, personally appeared , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as president of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. Notary Public for the State o£ California My commission expires: , 19__ -2- sff/DEDl14757 (120790) CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above. City of Temecula Ron Parks Mayor Attest: By.' June Greek City Clerk Approved As To Form: By: Scott F. Field City Attorney -3- EXHIBIT In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road In Block 2, as shown by Map of Subdivision of the Peuba Lend and Water Company, In the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on file In Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San Dlego County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of the Town of Temecula as shown by Map on file In Book 15, Page 725 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, Callfornla~ thence South ~ degrees 25* 05" West, along the Northwesterlyboundary of said town of Temecule, · dlmnce of I~1 .#$ feet to · point on the Northerly right of way line of an unnamed road (SO feet wide) ee described In dedication and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded April 22, 1969 as Instrument .No. 3950z~ of Official Records of Riverside County, Californla~ thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line boing the arc of a tangent curve concave Northerly and heving · radlus of 375.71 feet through a central angle of. 19 degrees 01 "17#, · dlstance of 12a. 75 feet~ thence North 17 degrees 08"#2"" East, along the Easterly line of sald unnamed road a distance of 290.87 feet~ thence South a5 degrees 02"38" East, a distance of 271.16 feet to the point of beginning.. sff/DEC114757 (031891) EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS This DECLAR&TION OF P~STRICTIONS made this __ day of , 19__, by SAM HICK~ MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION, hereinafter referred to as #Declarant." WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the following parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit #A,# Attached. WHEREAS, Declarant intends to grant, for valuable consideration, the above described property, restricting it in accordance with a plan designed to preserve the historical qualities of said land for the benefit of the City of Temecula. NOW, TH~I~EFOI~, Declarant declares that said real property shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed, leased, and occupied, subject to ~he covenants and restrictions hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and benefit of said property and of each and every person who now or in the future owns any portion or portions of said real property. The property shall be used for historical, educational, public park, and/or public recreational purposes only. The name of the park shall remain S~RICKS MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION. -1- sff/DEC114757(031891) 0 o Location of Monument The Location of the 'THEY PASSED THXS WAY' monument is to remain the same. Maintenance The City of Temecula, the Community Services District or their designee shall maintain landscaping and trash pick-up. Additional landscaping should be implemented - peripheral flower gardens and herb gardens should be added in such a way as to not diminish the usable footage of the park· The landscaping shall also, at all times, reflect the 1890 theme of the TF~ECULA HISTORICAL OVEItLAY. (The TEMECUL~HZSTORZC&LOVEItLAY shall be placed on file wih the Temecula City Clerk concurrently with recordation of this Declaration.) Plaques The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District or their designate shall place all plaques commemorating MEMORIAL TREES on granite bases cemented into the ground. laprovaents Curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be placed around the Park on Moreno Road and Mercedes Avenue. Lighting of the Park is to be done using the old time fixtures as used in OLD TOWN TEM~CULA. All buildings shall reflect at all times the 1890 theme of this TEMECUL~ HISTORICAL Grantor shall be entitled to XN~UNCTIV~ RELIBF and ~ON~BL~ &TTO~NEY FEES if the Grantee and/or its successors in interest violate or attempt to violate any covenant contained herein. pla~ing Recommendations of the TEMECULA COMMUNITY PLAN TASK FORCE are to be incorporated in the planning of the Park. (The TEMECULA COMMUNITY PLAN TASK FORCE will be more specifically defined at a date subsequent to the date of this Declaration and shall be placed on file and referred to as required by this provision.) -2- sff/DEC114757 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration of Restrictions the day and year first above written. Declarant: Nancy Maurice, President Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation &CKNOWL~DOEHENT State of California County of Riverside On this__ day of , in the year 19 , before me, , a notary public, personally appeared , proved to me on the basis of eatisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as president of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation excecuted it. Notary for the State of California My commission expires: , 19__ -3- EXHIBIT In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road in Block 2, es shown by Map of Subdivision of the P·uba Land and Water Company, In the County of Riverside, State of California, ·s shown by Map on file in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, G·llfornl·, described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of the Town of Temecula es shown by Map on file In Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, · I California, thence South ~1 degrees 25 05 West, ·long the Northwesterly boundary of said town of Temecul·, · disronco of 1#1 .#5 feet to ~l point on the Northerly right of way line of ·n unnamed road {60 feet wide) es described In dedlcatlon and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded April 22, .lg6g as Instrument .No. 3950a of Official Records of Riverside County, Callfornla, thence Westerly continulng along said Northerly line being the arc of · tangent curve concave Northerly and having · radius of 375.78 feet through · central angle of. lg degrees 01~17", · distance of 12#. 75 feet~ thence North 17 degrees 08~#2"e East, along the Easterly line of said unnamed road · distance of 290.87 feet~ thence South 45 degrees 02t38" East, a distance of 271.15 feet to the point of beginning.. PRELIMINARY REPORT COVER' Printed Policy Exceptions and Exclusions ALTA RESIDENTIAL POLICY (S-147) ALTA LOAN POUCY (10-2147) WITH &L1X ENDOfLSEMENT FO~M I C~VEJ~KGE .,,'LTA STANDARD COVERAGE POIJCY--~...,d 3. DMI~L liens. I~L*UmMIhCII. Idw~m ciMmI or Mh~r (el qM!m/M~ or nol mumlid m ~I I)MMic reconls m Dote of pod,:y. IIM ~mid. IMPred. timtoured ~r oIrN(I tO I~ ~ insured oimmonl: fi)! ~ kho~ to me Coffinfly. f'~ rIxM'did ifi t~ wablic r~cords Irtw to ~ dl~o tim inI~Kecl c~b~om bI~Ome on ihsured under AL3X OWNER'& POLJCY (10-2147) To: PRELIMINARY REPORT TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA 3880 LEMON STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA g2501 (714) 686-4180 (800) 442-4970 May 30, 1990 City of Temecula Attn: Frank Aleshtre 43172 Business Park Ortve lemecula, CA 9~390 Your RAference: Park Site Our No. : C51gGX! In response to the above referenced application for a Policy of Title Insurance, TICOR TITL~ INSURANCE O~ANY OF CALIFORNIA hereby reports that it ts prepared to tssue, or c~use to be issued, is of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the l&nd and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to ms an exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the prtnted Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Pollcy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of smtd Poltcy or Poltctes ere set forth on the attached cover. Coptes ,of the Poltcy forms should be read. They are available from the offtce which tssued thts report. This Report (and any supplements or mmendments thereto) ts issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the tssuance of a Poltcy of Tttle Insurance and no 11&btltty 1s assumed hereby. If it is destred that liability be assumed prtor to the tssuance of a Poltcy of Tttle Insurance, a Btnder or Comttment should be requested. b tti Officer The form of Policy of Tttle Insurance contemlated by this Report is: ( ) ALTA Residential Policy (6-1-87) ( ) ALTA Loin Pollc~ (10-21-87) Mth ALTA Endorsemnt Fom 1 Coverage (X) CLTA Stlndard Coverlge Policy - 1988 ( ) ALTA Owner's Po11~y (10-21-87) () The estate or interest in the land heretr~fter described or referred to covered by thts report ts a fee. C519611 Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation, a non-profit corporation At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions contained in said Policy form would be as follows: 1. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.S (cmmmnctng wtth Sectton 75) of the Revenue and Taxatton Code of the State of CAlifornia. 1A. General and special taxes for the fiscal year 1990-1991, a lien not yet payable. IB. General and special taxes for the fiscal year 1989-1990, First Installment : $1o707.71o now delinquent to which a penalty must be added Penalty : S170.77 Second Installment : S1,707.73, now delinquent to which a penalty Pena 1 ty Advertising Cost Tax Code Tax Parcel Mo. Exemption Affecting and advertising cost must be added : $170.77 : $10.00 : 094-0M : 921-070-016-4 : None : Setd land lC. Oef&ulted general aM special taxes and subsequent delinquencies for the Fiscal Year : 1989-1990 Taxing Authority: County of Riverside Parcel Number : 921-070-016-4 Amount to P~y : $2.068.62 Prior to : June :30, 1990 Affecting : Said land 1D. Supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 1988-1989, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chmpter 3.S (commencing with section 7S) of the Revenue aM Taxation Code of the State of C~11fornia: Tax Code : 094-022 Tax Parcel NO. : 921-070-016-4 Assessment No. : 0SM70867-5 First Installment : S1,S9~.S9, Paid Second InstillBent : SI,S96.S9, now delinquent to whtch · permlty Ind advertising cost must be added Penalty : SIS9.6S Advertising Cost : SI0.00 2. An easement in favor of the public over any portion of the herein described property tncluded wtthin publtc roads. C519611 3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in an instrument Recorded : April 2S, lg73 as Instrument No. S2863 Restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, reltgton or nattonal origin are deleted. 4 4. The terms. covenants, conditions, and restrictions, contained in an instrument entttled 'Agency Agreement'. executed by and between Kacor Realtyo Inc., a California corporation, and Rancho California Water District, e public corporation. dated March 2g, 1979, and recorded M~ 7, 1979 as Instrument No. 92330. C519611 DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this report is situated tn the County of Riverside. State of Callforntao and ts described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, and of the unamed road no~ known as NorenD Road tn Block 2, as sho~n by Kap of Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Coepany, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as per cap recorded in Book 11, Page 507 of Naps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Otego County, California, described as follo~s: Beginning at the mst Westerly corner of Lot 32, Block l, of the To~n of 7eeecula as sho~n byNap on ftle tn Book IS, Page 726 of Naps, Records of San Otego County, California; thence South 44°25'05· West, along the Northwesterly boundary of satd To~m of Teeecula. a dtstance of 141.4S feet to a potnt on the Northerly rtght of way 1the of an unnamed road no~ kno~m as Mercedes Street (60.00 feet wtde) as described in Oedtcatton and Easecent Oeed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded Apr11 22. 1969 as Instrueent No. 39504 of Offtotal Records of Riverside £ounty, California; thence South 88°07'2S· tlest, along satd #ortherly 11ne, &dtstance of 55.58 feet; ,hence Uesterl~ continuing along said Northerly line betrig the arc of a.tangent curve co, ave Northerly and having a radtus of 375.78 feet through a central angle of 19~01'17°o a dtstance of 124.7S feet; thence North 17°08'42' East, along the Easterly 1the of satd unnaeed road a dtstance of 290.87 feet;. thence South 45°02'38· East, a dtstance of 271.16 feet to the potnt of beginning. NOTE THE FOLL~ING Note 1: Pursuant to Sections 480.3 end 480.4 of the Revenue &ridTaxation Code, the County Recorder's offtce wtll levy an additional $20.00 recording fee upon all documents that ~re not in cmpllance wtth s&td code. To ~votd betng assessed the addltton~1 fee, please have the buyer or transferee co,plate the preliminary change of o~rshtp report and attach to the appropriate docueent. C519611 Note Z: It appears that the coapany a~y be requested to tnsure or other~tse pass on the valtdtty of certatn docuuents executed by a corporate entity. If this ts correct such documents should be executed by etther the chairman of the board of directors, the president, or any vtce president and by etther the secretary, any assistant secretary, chief financial offtear or the assistant treasurer. If such documents are not so executed, we vtll require an approved resolution of the board of directors of such corporation authorizing such execution. Note 3: The charges for thts tttle report are for servtces to date only. Any additional ~ork requested tn regards to thts report wtll tncur additional. charges as appropriated. Note 4: California 'Good Fund' Law All tttle Insurance companies, controlled escrow companies and undervrttten tttle companies wt11 be affected by a neu lau~htch becomes effective on January I, 1990. Assombly Btll $12 (Chiptar SOS, Statutes of 1989), ~htch added. Section 12413.1 to the' Insurance Code of the State of Caltfornt& is effective January 1, 1990. Except for funds deposited by cash or by electronlc)e~ment, thts 1iv prohibits I tttle Insurance co, any frmdtsburstng funds from an 'escrow account, unttl the day ~hese funds ire &lde &vailable to the depositor pursuant to Part Z29 of Tttle IZ of. the Code of Federal Regulations, (Iteg. CC). Under Rag. CO, 1tam such es'CASHIER'S CERTIFIED or TELLER'S CHECKS KY be avatllble for disbursement on the busthess day following the business d~yof depostt; however, other forus of depostts i~y cause extended delays tn the closteg of the escrow. Ttcor Tttle Insurance vtll not be responsible for accruals of tnterest resulting from compliance with the disbursement restrictions aandated by thts law. If yo~ choose to wtre transfer funds to our company tn order to avoid any delays tn clostngo please use the folioring formt; *1life Instructions: Ctttblnk, Delaware One Penn's ¥~y I~ CIstle, Delaware MA ~031100~) Credit: Ticor Tttle Ins. of CA. - Riverside ACCOUnt 1381S0936 ~er~ o £scrov/Tttle Officer's ~ ~ Az~ette ~r N~r CS19611 INPORT~T It ts tmerattve that the wtr~ text be exactly as Indicated ibove. Any extraneous or mlsstng tnformtton MY cause unnecessary delays tn confirmleg the receipt of funds. sff/lGR114757(020191-2) EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS LEAsh is entered into as of January 1, 1991, between the CITY OF TRMECUL~, hereinafter called "Lessor," and THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA HISTORICAL MUSBUM FOUNDATION, a California non-profit public benefit corporation, hereinafter called "Lessee." Lessor acquired title in the name of the CITY OP TEMECUL~ to the real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto, by deed dated · NOW, THEREFORe, in consideration of promises hereinafter mentioned, the parties, Lessee, agree as follows: covenants and Lessor and 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Lessor hereby. leases to Lessee, and Lessee here hires and takes from Lessor, the Property to be defined as that land to be occupied By the museum as per the attached plot plan (Exhibit nB" attached hereto) located on Moreno Road, Temecula, California, hereinafter called the #Property.u 2. THRM. The term of this agreement shall be forty (40) years, commencing on November 1, 1990, and ending on October 31, 2030. This Lease may be extended as set forth in paragraph four (4) of this Agreement. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor as rent for the use and occupancy of the Property the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) per year, payable in advance on the first (1st) day of January of each year commencing with January 1, 1991, and continuing thereafter during Leasee's use and occupancy of the Property. -1- sff/AGR114757(020191-2) If the Lessee renews the term of this Lease as provided in paragraph four (4), the Lease shall continue for the same rental rate. Rent shall be payable in lawful money of the United States to Lessor at the address stated herein or to such other persons or at such other places as Lessor may designate in writing. 4. OPTION TO ILBNEW. As part of the consideration for the execution of this Lease, Lessor hereby grants to Lessee, an option to extend and renew the provisions of this Lease for a twenty-year term, upon the same terms and conditions hereof. The option to renew and extend the provisions of this Lease must be exercised, if at a11, by notice in writing given to Lessor not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration on the previous term. 5. USB OP TH~ PROPERTY. The Property shall be used for the construction and operation of a museum of a minimum of 3,000 s~uare feet, including public restrooms. Construction of said structures shall commence within three (3) years of the date of this Lease. In addition, a final inspection or certificate of occupancy shall be obtained within five (5) years of the date of this Lease. The Property shall also be used for the telstation of a church of 1,200 square feet. Other construction projects, not specifically permitted by this Lease are prohibited. The design and location of said structures shall be subject to Lessor's approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee also agrees to comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances of every governmental body or agency whose authority extends to the leased Property, or to the business conducted upon the leased Property. 6. LLTSRATZON8. Lessee may not make any alterations (other than insubstantial ones) to the leased Property or structures thereon without Lessor's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably wi~hheld. Lessee, at Lossee's own expense, shall comply with all present and future governmental requirements arising out of, in connection with, or necessitated by such alterations. 7. FIITURBf. All fixtures placed on the leased Property by Lessee shall at all times be and remain the personal propercy of Lessee, and Lessee shall have the right to remove such fixtures at any time during the term hereof and also within five (5) business days after the termination of this Lease. Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, -:2- sff/AGl~114757 (020191-2) restore and repair any damage to the leased Property caused or occasioned by the removal of the fixtures. Such repair and restoration shall be performed within five (5) business days after the expiration of this Lease and shall be performed in compliance with the terms and conditions of Paragraph 8 of this Lease relating to repairs. 8. RBP&IRS. Lessee accepts the Property as being in good order, repair and condition. At all times during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall, at Lessee's own cost and expense, and at no cost and expense to Lessor, maintain the Property and all portions of the Property in good order and repair and make all repairs and replacements that may become necessary to the Property, any buildings or improvements on the Property, or any sidewalks, landscaping, driveways, or parking areas that are part of, or appurtenant to, the Leased Property. Any and all repairs and replacements required by this provision, both ordinary and extraordinary and both structural and nonstructural, shall be made promptly by Lessee as required and shall comply with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, and regulations. Lessee hereby waives the provisions of sections 1941 and 1942 of the California Civil Code relating to Lessor's duty for tenantable premises and Lessee's right to make repairs and deduct the expenses of such repairs from the rent. 9. XANDSCAPB ~AI~TB~CZ. Lessee shall recognize that the installation and maintenance of landscaping on the Property is an integral part of the lease. Lessee shall maintain and care for landscaping on the Property using generally accepted methods of cultivation and watering. Lessee shall maintain that standard of care necessary to prevent the landscaping from deteriorating to the extent that its value as landscaping is destroyed. Lessee shall also maintain landscape of Property in a manner and design reflecting the 1890 theme of the TEMECULA HISTORICAL OVERlAY. If Lessee fails to maintain the landscaping in such proper condition, Lessor Bay give written notice of such deficiency to Lessee. If the Lessor gives notice to Lessee of a deficiency, Lessee shall have thirty (30) business days within which to take reasonable steps to cure the deficiency. If Lessee has not coBdencad corrective activity within such thirty (30) days, the City may elec~ to take the steps necesmary to insure that the landscaping is maintained and cared for. At least fifteen (1S) days prior to entering the Proper~y to perform any such corrective work, Lessor shall either personally serve a notice of its intent to enter the premises for this purpose on the Lessee or mail a -3- sf f/AGR114757 (020191-2) copy of such notice by certified mail to the Leesee's last known address, or as shown on ~he tax rolls. Lessor may enter the Property to perfor~ such corrective work as it reasonably considers necessary and proper to return the landscaping to its proper condition. Lessor may act either through its own employees or ~hrough an independent contractor to perform such corrective work. If Lessor incurs costs, including administrative costs and attorney's fees in returning ~he landscaping to its proper condition pursuant to ~he procedure set forth in paragraph 7 above, Lessor may make a demand upon Lessee for payment of such costs as are reasonable under ~he circumstances. If Lessee fails to pay such costs within ~11irty (30) business days after the date demand is made, the terms and provisions of this lease shall terminate. 10. UCSAWZCS, LZBNS. Lessee hereby agrees to keep the leased Property and the improvements thereon or hereafter erected or placed thereon, and every part thereof, and every estate, right, title, and interest therein, or in or to any part thereof, at all times during the term of this Lease, free and clear of mechanics' liens and other liens for labor, service, supplies, equipment, or materials. Lessee also agrees to fully pay and discharge and wholly protect and save harmless Lessor and all and every part of the estate, right, title, and interest of Lessor in and to all and every part of said demised Property and improvements against any and all demands or claims that may or could ripen into such liens or labor claims. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may, if Lessee fur~ishes Lessor with a bond or other security against loss or liability by reason thereof in a fo~ acceptable to Lessor, contest, at Leesee's sole cost and expense, any such liens or claims and litigate the same final Judgment; in the event Lessee shall have taken an appeal from an adverse Judgment, Lessor shall at all times during the pendency of such appeal prevent the execution of such 3udgment pending appeal. 11. DBSTRU~TZON OF PROPERTY. Should any building or ~uprovenente on the leased Property be damaged or destroyed by fire, the elements, Ac~s of C~d, or other causes no~ the fault o~ Lessee or any person in or about the leased Property with the express or hplied consent of Lessee, they shall be repaired or replaced by Lessee at its own cost and expense; however, should the cost of repairing or restoring any buildings or ~nprovaments so damaged or destroyed exceed fifty percent (50%) of the replacement cost of all buildings and improvements to be located on the leased Property, Lessee may, at its option, either repair -4- ~ff/A~Rl14757(020191-2) and restore the damaged buildings and improvements or cancel this Lease. 12. SURRENDER OP PROPBRTY. On expiration or sooner termination of ~his Lease, or any extensions or renewal of this Lease, Lessee shall promptly surrender and deliver said Property to Lessor in as good condition as it is now at the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear and repairs hereafter required to be made by Lessor excepted. Lessee may surrender the proper~y leaving the buildings relocated or constructed pursuant to this Lease in place with the consent of Lessor and at no cost to Lessor. This paragraph is subject to the conditions of Paragraph 7 relating to removal of fixtures. On file with the City Clerk of the City of Temecula are photographs of the property in its condition as of the date of execution of this Lease. 13. ]~LZBITABILZTY OF PROPERTY. Nothing in this Lease shall be construed to restrict the alienability of said Property. Lessor retains the right to sell or encumber said Property at any time during the term of this Lease. 14. UTILITIES. Lessee agrees to pay for all utilities, including telephone, water, gas, electricity, and any and all other services which may be used in or upon the leased Property during the term of this Lease without liability of Lessor. For each service, Lessee shall pay the cost for the use of the service directly to the utility provider prior to the time that the charge becomes delinquent. 15. T~tXBS. During the term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay before delinquency (1) all taxes, assessments, license fees, and any other charges of any type whatsoever that are levied, assessed, charged, or imposed on or against Lessee's possessory interest and/or personal property installed or located in or on the leased Property and that become payable during the term of this lease and (2) all real property taxes and general and special assessments levied and assessed against the leased Property. 16. IrAITS OR NUXSANCB. Lessee shall not commit or permit the comaission by others of any waste on said Property, including graffiti~ Lessee shall not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance as defined in SeCtion 34?9 of the California Civil Code on said Property; and Lessee shall not use or permit the use of said Property for any unlawful purpose. -5- sff/AGR114757 (020191-2) 17. /t~BZGNMEI~TAND BUBLETTZNG. L~ssee may assign this Lease or an interest therein and may also sublet the Property, provided Lessee first obtains the written consent of Lessor to any such assignment or subletting. If, during the term of this Lease, Lessee requests the written consent of Lessor to any assignment or subletting, Lessor's consent shall not unreasonably be withheld. A consent to one assignment or subletting, and any subsequent assignment or subletting without Landlord's consent shall be void and shall, at Landlord's option, terminate this Lease. Any approved assignment or sublease shall not relieve Lessor of liability under ~he terms of this Lease. 18. INDEMNITY ~ND INSURANCB. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any act, omission or negligence of Lessee, or its contractors, licensees, agents, servants, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury or damage whatsoever caused to any person or property occurring in, on, or about the Property, the sidewalks adjoining the Property, and from and against all costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon, including, but not limited to, cour~ costs and reasonable attorney's fees. Lessee shall maintain in full force during the term of this Lease, a policy or policies of general liability insurance in the minimum amount for the first year of the term of this Lease of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) combined single-limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and prope~y damage. Upon the final inspection for certificate of occupancy for the MUseum described at Section 5 of this Lease, the amount of said insurance shall increase to One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). Lessee shall name Lessor as an additional insured on such policies. Lessee shall furnish Lessor with a Cer~ificate of Insurance with respect to such policy or policies prior to entry on the property. The policies shall further be endorsed with a mbroad foram endorsement so as to provide comprehensive general liability insurance for the Joint benefit of lessor and lessee for personal injuries. Lessee shall maintain in force, at Lossee's expense, a policy or policies of insurance protecting against the following: Fire and other perils normally included in the e~cended coverage insurance with special form, to the extent of at least one-hundred percent (100%) of the insurehie value of the building(s) and other -6- s~f/AGR114757 (020191-2) improvements placed on the property pursuant to the Lease, exclusive of trade fixtures and equipment belonging to Lessee. (2) Fire and extended coverage insurance with respect to Leesee's fixtures and equipment located on the property with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements to the extent of one-hundred percent (100%) of their immutable value. During the term of this Lease, the proceeds of any such policy or policies for fire insurance should be used solely for the repair or replacement of the fixtures or equipment so insured. (3) Lessee shall furnish Lessor with a Certificate of Insurance with respect to all policy or policies required pursuant to this Lease prior to entry on the property, and occupancy of any buildings constructed or relocated onto the property. If any such insurance required in this Lease has a deductible clause, the deductible amount shall not exceed $1,000.00 per occurrence, and Lessee shall be liable for any such deductible amount. (4) The coverage amounts for all insurance requirements pursuant to the City shall increase annually at a rate equal to the Consumer Price Index for Riverside County. 19. XNBPBCTXON. Lessor may enter upon the Property at any reasonable time for the purpose of inspecting the Property. mReasonable timem shall be defined as during normal operating hours. 20. IN~OLVBNCY. The insolvency of Lessee as evidenced by a receiver being appointed to take possession of all or substantially'all of the property of Lessee, or the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by Lessee, shall terminate the Lease and entitle Lessor ~o renter and regain Possession of leased Property. 21. UIIL~ITUL DBTAINBR. In the event of any breach of lille Lease by Lessee, Lessor, in addition to any o~er rights or r~edies it ~y have, ~y give ~ssee a ~ee-day notice to ~re ~e breach or ~it ~e premises. If ~ssee fails to do eider, ~ssor ~y bring a s~atuto~ proceeding in un~awru~ detainer to r~ain ~ssession of ~e ~o~y. ~y notice given by ~e ~ssor pursuan~ ~o ~is paragraph does not conmtitu~e te~ination of ~is ~ase unless e~ressly so declared by ~ssor in ~e no~ice. -7- S.£ f/AGRZ 14757 ( 020191-2 ) 22. FAXVEX OP BitEACH. The waiver by Lessor of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, or condition, or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition herein contained, The subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by Lessor shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior occurring breach by Lessee of any term, covenant, or condition of ~his Lease, other than the failure of Lessee to pay the particular rental so accepted, regardless of Lessor's knowledge of such prior existing breach at the time of acceptance of such rent. 23. ABANDONMENT. In the event that Lessee shall be absent from the demised Property for a period of 30 days after default in payment of rent or other obligations imposed on Lessee by this Lease, such absence shall be deemed to constitute an abandonment of Lessee's interest in the demised Property and an abandonment by Lessee of any personal property left on the demised Property, and Lessor may thereupon reenter the Property as hereinbefore provided. 24. BXNDXNG ON SUCCESSORS. The provisions of this Lease shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and legal representatives of the parties hereto. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a consent by Lessor to any assignment of this Lease or any interest therein by Lessee except as provided in Paragraph 18 of this Lease. 25. NOTXCES AND P&YMBNTS. Whenever notices and payments are required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, they shall be sent to either party, in writing and postage prepaid by registered mail, addressed as follows: To the Lessor at: City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Te~ecula, CA 92390 To the Lessee The Old Town Temecula Historical !(useuu Foundation, A California Non-profit Public Benefit Corporation P.O. Box 792 Teuecula, CA 92390 Either party may change such address by written notice by -8- ~ff/AGRl14757(020191-2) registered mail to the other party. 26. DEFAULT, NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BP~ACH. A default in the performance of any promise of, or of any obligation imposed upon Lessor and Lessee, shall not constitute a breach of this Lease unless the party in default fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after the written notice of default has been served, except that failure to cure a default in the payment of rent shall constitute a breach of this Lease if such default is not cured within five (5) days after written notice of default has been served. If either party breaches this Lease, the other party shall be entitled to pursue every legal and equitable remedy available, including (but not limited to) the right to terminate this Lease and the right to recover accrued rent, paid in advance. Lessor, in addition to other remedies it may have, shall have the immediate right to teentry, and may remove all persons and property from the Property, such property may be stored at the cost of Lessee. The prevailing pa~cy shall be reimbursed attorney's fees. IN WITNESS W~EP~OF, the parties have executed this Lease the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEHECUI~, A Municipal Corporation TH~ OLD TOWNT~MBCULA HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION a California Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation RON PARKS Mayor ATTEST: By: JUNE S. GREEK City Clerk APPORVED AS TO FORM: SCOTT F. FIELD City Attorney -9- EXHIBIT In the City of Temecula, County of Rlverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road in Block 2, as shown by Map of Subdivislon of the Pauba Land and Water Company, In the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on file In Book 11, Pege 507 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California, described u follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of the Town of Temecula as shown by Map on file In Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California: thence South ~Pl degrees 25" 05" West, along the Northwesterlyboundary of said town of Temecula,. distance of 1#1 .#5 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way line of an unnmned road (60 feet wide) as described in dedication and easement deed to the County of Riveraide by deed recorded April 22, .1969 as Instrument .No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside County, California, thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being the arc of a tangent curve concave Northerly and having · radius of :i7S.78 feet through · central angle of. 19 degrees 01'17", a distance of 12#.75 feet: thence North 17 degrees 08'#2" East, along the Easterly line of said unnamed road. distance of 290.87 feet: thence South 45 degrees 02~38" East, a distance of 271.16 feet to the point of hoginning.. · '" 0 · ' ~ " · . Ca for'n a OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE CORPORATION DIVISION I, MARCH FONG EU, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: · That 'the annexed transcript has been compared with the corporate record on file in this office, of which it purports to be a copy, and that same is full, true and correct. ~0 IFOR IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and a/fix the Great Seal of the State of California this · .'.:~':,:',-."-L- - ~ ~ ! ' The n~e o~ the co~~ ~MTiCLE 2 ~ais corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation amd is not organized for the private g~in of any person. it is organized under the Nonprofit Public ~enefit Corporation Law for public purposes. The public and charitable purposes of the corporation are to collect, protect, preserve ~nd display the history and artifacts indigenous to the Temecula Valley. This corporation is organized exclusively to collect, protect, preserve a~d display the history a~d artifacts indigenous to the Temecula Valley, within the meaning of Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue 0ode of 1954 or the corresponding provision of any future United States internal revenue law. Notviths~anding Luy other provision of these articles, this corporation shall not, except to an insub- stantial degree, engage i~ any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of the purposes of this corporation, and the corporation shall not carry on any other activities not permit:ed to be carried on (a) by a corpora:ion exempt from federal income tax under Section 501 (c) (3) of the internal Revenue Code of 1954 or :be corresponding provision of any future United States inte_-nal revenue law, or (b) by a corporation, contribu:ions t~ which are deductible under Section 170 (c) (2) of the !ntex~al Revenue ~ode of 195Z cr the corresponding prcvis£on of any future United States L~ternal revenue law. The Name and address in California of the corporarich's initial agent for service of process Nancy ~Aurice, c/o Maurice Printers, 27447 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, Cal iformia 92390. · .RTICLE 4 A. No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall consist of carrying on propaganda, or other~ise attemptin~ to influence legislation, and this corporation shall not participate in or intervene in (including publishing or distributing statements) Any political campaign ~n behalf of any candidate for public office. B. All corporate property is irrevocably dedicated to the purposes set forth in Article Two above. I~o part of the net earning~ of this corporation shall inure to the benefit of amy of its directors~ trustees, officers, private shareholders members, or to individuals. "-~[] ~y~he v/ndlng up and dl~solutLon of this corporation, after paying or ~equately ..... ....~ for the debts, obl~tion~, ~d liabilities of the co~t~on, the · ..-.~ of thee co~t~on e~l ~ d~etri~d to such or~t~ (or or~zatione~ ~zed ~d ope~t~ exclusively for ch~r~mble~ l~te~, or educational ~ch h~ e~tabl~ehed its ~-exempt I~e ~der Section ~O1 (c) (~) of the ~temal Rescue Code of 1~ (or the co~ee~nd~ section of_~y lucre · ~te~tem~l rev~ue la~) ~d ~h~ch h~e ee~bl~hed ~t~ ~ exempt sta~ under /Section ~701d of the ~l~fom~ Rev~ue ~d ~axation Code ~or the corres~nd~ section. of ~y ~m~ ~l~fom~a revenue ~d ~x la~). - ' State of' Cal:Lforn£=) County of Riverside) On this the q d~y of January, 1987, before the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared RAY~0ND persona/ly known to me /~ proved to me ~n th~ basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name ie subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that he executed it. WITNESS my h~ud m~d official seal. · ' Department of the Treasury · Internal Revenue Service District Director P 0 Box 2350 Room 5137 Los Angeles, CA 90053 THE OLD TEMECULA HZSTORZCAL MUSEUM 28676 FRONT STREET -VENZCE, CA 92390 Employer Zdentification Numborl 33-0152755 Case Numbarl 957212023 Contact Personl FORELL, ANTOZNETTE Contact Telel[hone Numbo£=.. (213) 894-4553 Accounting Period Ending= December 31st Form 990 Required= Caveat Applies; yes Dear Applicant= Based on information supplied, and assuming your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exemption, we have determined you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c) C3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Me have further determined that you are not a private foundation within [he meaning of seetmon 509(a) of the Code, because you are an organization described in section 509(a)(2). If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or method of operation change, please let us knoN so Ne can consider the effect of tho change on your exempt status and foundation status. Also, you should inform us of all changes in your namo or addross. As of January 1, 2984, you are liable for taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (social security taxes) on remuneration of $100 or more you pay to each of your employees during I calendar year. You arm not liable for the tax imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Since you are not a private foundation, you arm not subject to the excise taxes under Chapter 42 of the Code. HoNevet, you are not automatically exempt from other Federal excise taxes. If you have any questions about exc~ee, employment, or other Federal taxes, please let us knoN. Donors mRy deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of the Code. Bequests, legacies, dmvmsms, transfers, or gifts to you or for your use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable provisionm of lectionl 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. The heading of this letter mndicatos whether you sust file Form 990, Return of Organmzation Exempt from Zncome Tax. [f Yes ms indicated, you era required to file Form 990 only if your gross rece=pts each year are normally more than S25,000. If a return ie required, it must be filed by the Letter g47(CG) THE OLD TEHECULA HZSTORZCAL HUSEU# 15th day of the fifth month after the end of your annual accounting period. The I·N imposes I penalty'of $10 · dey~ up to · maximum of $5,000., .hen · return is filed lite,' unless there is reaeonable cause for the delay. You are not required to file Federal income tax raturne unless you are subject to the tax on unrelated business income under section 51! of the Code. Zf you are subject to thai tax, you must file an income tax return on Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business [noDe· Tax Return. Zn this letter, we are not determining whether any of your present or proposed activities are unrelated trade or business as defined in section 513 of the Code. You need an employer identification number even if you have no employees. If an employer identification number was not entered on your application, · number will be assigned to you and you ,ill be advised of it. Pie·me use that number on all returns you film and in ~11 correspondence with the Znternal Revenue Service. Because thio letter could help resolve any questions about your exempt st··us and foundation status, you should keep it in your permanent records. Zf the heading of this letter indicates that · caveat applies, the caveat below or on the enclosure is an integral part of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact the person.hose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. Sincerely yours, Frederick C. Nielsen District Director THE OLD TENECULA H~STORICAL NUS£UN -3- You are required to file Fore 990-T ~hen..grose receipts froe unrelated business activities exceed $1~000.00. Advertising incoes is considered unrelated business income. TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT Pittiota S Novomey, Ed.D. BOARD OF EDUCATION Will Sw~ckll Or. O~wgl Euric~ MiW Jo Hllmlkl July 12, 1990 Mrs. Nancy Maurice, President Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation Post Office Box 573 Temecula, California 92390 Dear Mrs. Maurice: On May 3, 1988, the Governing Board of the Temecula Union School District approved the transfer of title on the Sam Hicks Monument Park site from the district to the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation with the stipulation that the site be forever maintained as a public park. The ~urpose of this letter is to reiterate that it was the intention of the district and ~he Governing Board that this restriction would be honored. We are in support of the Park Foundation's position in this matter, and will strenuously oppose any other use of the land. Sincerely, TEMECULA VALT.~.Y UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ~acrzc~a u. Novot=ey, Ed.D. Superintendent PBN:mw 31350 Rancho Vistl Roac~ / Temecuia. CA 92390 / (714~ 676-2661 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box 792 Temec~, C~ifomiz 92390 (714) 676-0021(714) 676-6329 (Coraor) Supervisor Welt Abraham County Administrative Center aO80 Lemon Street, lath Floor Riverside Ca., 92~01 RE: The Temecula Museum St. Catherine's Catholid Church February 6, 1991 Dear Mr. Abraham, I am sure you get more than your share of letters, so here are pictures/articles to bring.you up to date on our momentum with the museum building program. At first I thought we were' finally'in an enviable position be- cause the City of Temecula is extremely interested in helping us with the remodelin9 of the church (so we can work on the funding ?or the future museum ourselves). AND those involved in the redevelopment settlelent began'assisting us in getting "advance monies" from the anticipated settlement. To tantalize the situa- tion even more, at year's end the City found they had even more of a surplus than first thought. well, in a nutshell, so ?at the City has overlooked our request and I assume it is becauseo? the probable settlement o? the suit. I understand from Mr. Dixon's secretary, the suit could move toward a conclusion in 60 days but there is no timeframe for the distribu- tion. The gals from the Banning Rehabilitation/?.Counselin9 Center did a marvelous job(and are beggin9 to come back ?or more...they say it sure beats picking up trash and they are doing some:bin9 "permanantly good"). Now that we have begun to get the valley's attention, it would be terrible to abandon the momentum, and waiting ~-6 months would certainly do that. I need your guidance in solving this sit- uation to everyone's satis?action. I? money's from redevelopment are slated for us, I could really use it now. We have completed a a construction request with Henry-Ann Company in Temecula and have met with Gary Klng/ShawniNelson to delete items on the bid the City will be responsible for. A copy is available to you i? needed to reaffirm our preparedness. Help! Help! Thanks alot for any M~~erely, ~ 8~cEE Nakaya President, Board of Oirecto~Ps Temecula Museum Home Address: ~5788 Creekside Way Temecula, Ca. 92~90 (71~) 676-0~22 cc: David NcElroy assistance you can offer. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PARKS DEPARTMENT 4600 Crestmore Road, P.O. Box 3507, Riverside, CA 92519 · (714) 275-4310 PAUL D. ROMERO Director March 26, 1991 01d Town Temecula Museum P.0. Box 792 Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Board of Directors: On behalf of the Parks Department, thank ,you for ~our generous contribution of $100 toward the roof repairs on the I~olfe Store Adobe at Vat1 Ranch. Thanks to ~,our donation, we are happ~ to report that the roof is being repaired and the adobe walls of this most important and valuable structure are no longer being threatened b~ the rain. Again, we thank ~ou. Your qutck and generous response to this emergenc~ has been heartening. IdaT/~Regards, Paul O. Romero 0t rec tot · Otana L. Setder Htstor7 Otvtston Otrector POR/Kg/2271S/mg Enclosure "T() acclu,re. proeea. develol:L manaBe and interiorel for the ,n~o~ration. use and enioymenl ot all IX, ogle. ~ well.b,ilanced sy&lem oi are~ o~ OUl,tand,nB scemc. re<:re~tio~. and hiMo~lc tmpo~ance." SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION P.O. Box 539 · Tamecula, CA 92390 (7'14) 676-3060 July 17, 1990 Temecula City Council, P.O. BOx 3000, TE~ECULA, CA 92390 Dear Council Members, At a meeting of the Sam Hicks Monument Park Board of Directors held on July 10, 1990 the members agreed the park should be under the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula and want to continue the request to have the park land annexed to:the city with the following stipulations: 1. The name of the park and any land annexed to it shall remain SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK. 2. The l~ation of the "THEY P~S~ THIS~Y" ~n~ent is to remain ~e s~me. 3. The lease we have with the OLD TO~ TE~CUIA ~ will be honored. Further discussions on the lease are to be conducted with the Museum Foundation Board. 4. The existing MEMORIAL TREES are to r~uain in the park site and others not yet planted are to be added. A list of those trees and the names of the donors will be supplied. 5. At all times the landscaping and buildings are to reflect the TE~I~ZULA HISTORICAL OVERLAY. 6. All of these stipulations are to be carried forth to any proposed park expansion. 7. The City of Te~ecula is asked to incorporate the ~e~,,~ndations of the T~dI~CULA COH~]h~TY PLAN TASK FORCE in the planning of the park. 8. This property is given to the City of T~ecula for a public park and a musem~ site. Should it be proposed for any other use, public or primate, and said proposal be ie~lemented in any form of action, the land will automatically revert back to SAM HICKS ~ PARK F0%~I~TION or its successors. The members of the Board of Directors of SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK request the City of Temecula accept the park under the terms heretofore stipulated and request an immediate decision. The members of the board of directors present at the July 10 meeting and voting uninimous agreement to the above stipulations were; Dennis Chinieaff, Peg Moore, Evelyn Harkmr, Ruth Chesher, Jack Davis, Ralph Narvaro, Tony Tobin and Nancy Maurice. Yours sincerely, MOTEL 6 SHOPPING CAR WASH GTE PARK EXPANSION POST OFFICE SAM P~ UNDER CONSTRUCTION FIRE STATION I ! · · ""' ......."-purcha.s.e. I Kmser,.Overland local histo'rical.c0Hiati' n : ... ................ ......... · :. · ....."'":.'.':.ulanclll-. .... ' .... ' ' 'b.!! ...... .. . . . . .. , · . ....... ~ ..-- .....:, · :.:.::::.....Blanchi:.:museum sale .pos.sj .~,~......~,.-.-~. c.,..,~,. ~, ...... . ~ .-.-......-?.~.......~. ...-.. ? . .~'~ .-;~W.~ .:. ..-~:.~- i~K .' ~. '.. : · .~-,~'.. ., *- .., ~.1~.~,,'..¢,'. · . ',.-.;~,';,,, ..:~ - ..,.~,,...-~.,. ~.*. -.:' ,-:...,, . . . ...,, . . .:.....~, .-.. "' ' l~Of~ rOl~ Pallea t~' DImlEAn m norin ~ ,, i~*.~.,s,d. v.k*..t .~. * .. ~ ~7 om~nOt-dmui m u~ !'~1'~ $ · Triflered,b7.. ; · ' · ' - " '"' '. .... rn ' st' .... - -. · the manehi Fnmtier Museum .[~Mlr uuersufumK a sme.was.~ sUralO rac,nT. ~j._-::._~q~j%,~ .1~ ? .me n. ew owners. sncula ~,,~-,i;i~*;-~,~, wag ~mssible;r _"!mmiMat add i quick 'purchasa..~....3ucb .'tbiMs :as,: _mr..~pa. re_n?.,L :sam ,sEep,ace, Pry,Mck said. c · · - · .-or Ibe Im:sl histori~ai !toms ~s,..maelr41~., eb!!ecti~a...~, =.- ;~ .--- ........... ~ ~ ':,":o '11 Ka,ser ~i:in~ meat Co.',~ad.... ...... . .... ,, ...... .. _.,.. ... ; - .... ,. ~ .,_. Overlm~l ~k 'ricentlx pard" ,'neaessar,/_~ ke~. the items~_'_.S.tanley.Gai'&kr 'bo~.s. a ?if of..~... :.... ~thou.lh purchased items ~-'~ to 't~ m~se~m'to ~uia '~'Uu'irei. ~ n.M."~'.~.~.:mn~.c=.,prs.:.~. s."'.rve. Y.?rs~.-.!.al -'? ~=e dlsp~a~ed 'lot a. lime'at ,_'T:_:T"_?..~-L_ .,~, ~,,~-tio~ ~' ' Many' of 'the iten~ 'were .~,smuneau,'.~ .ms.? re.t, a. ~o.s. ~. Overland ' !~nk ' .Pr~k ~;~-' ~'~i~,lc=lartifacu. do.ted ,by the family ~.f..belt trlp,.~n~,.I mexi.c~n b..n~..,, Overhod and Kaiser teamed up .............. ': · ' '~ r I~ ~eeo returned M- · · . keequ~tinf Job· Bianchi ,~T~mocub,l~m~'r S~m. !Jkks:,f~4K?. .... ~ to imy the itents because or thetr · '---~---~ ' to ' ' ' '** ' ' T ~' ". · · ownre; or the muse·n. it was . Nancy Maun~: ,daulbt¶r at ~.blr_a.t no CO?,:_._M~_,U__n,C~_ n.o, el...~,,..~irreplaeeable htstonca~--~,~th ,,,,, .r ,k.' !e tot St(arty :.tioaofuemnaceamemoramua ..g~ m.;s?.~, .,, . ...; ...p,eces ~, Kom ms~ · · . - ....... i.. · ..,,.~ .~.: .... '........-...,~ ~,.~.;,... ,. . ~- , ........ ,,,~',.:~,-,.-,...,-'.~t.-. {;,':7o cr~te i ho~i for thi.'ar, -..- '- '-'-':. : ............. · .... · ,.'tifacts. N·,cy Maurice .is ~':, .~. ~' -. ~ . ~.. '...% .~.: '!'~':; ::Y '" :;' ......:" '~ -''.' · ~ .':~ ;.. .... ~ .... ' ~.~'~:~ ~ ~.: .;.~ .~.. ,. .~.::,~b ':.. -. redoubtinK her ellarts to resurrect the now defuncL ?emecuis Hisioricll Society in: the hopes o( findifil · way to Lablish a new Incmi rmiseum. The board of the Sam lticks Memorial Park has discusse~ several alternatives. includinf the pursuit or Kovernment run-' diM to Irafid · muieum on · purk site. But since the park is' only.J M on Kre. tack or spac~ Ls 8 .r#! deterrot ~burice 'SOid. ~'~ :'% :~. ;'& ..... Ide. illylt Midirile 's~id Gonzales adobe~ une 'of the oldest standinK str~ctures in the ?efn~'ula Valley.' and to refur- ~ it. into the eommunity's filial mus~m. ~ ~'. ~: .-~ - =.- ::: '. Mat~te~ said she plans to taet. Rancho Consultants, adobe, !o discuis'the'l~ossihility or ereatinf a musaum o~t or the histodcIi Imiiding: historical orKinization exists 1o~aily ~o Kive custody ~he at-' tlf~ts ~too,.-. Prys~ ~id. Overlind B~nk. by e~istinK sncurity. ~il bulk ~f the histm'icsl ol~til I1~ lltol~ltive ¢~!~ bl york- December 5, 1985 Ms. Nancy J. Maurice Historical Committee 28690 Front Street, Suite 330 Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Nancy: Your obvious progress in preserving valuable Temecula Valley Historical memorabilia is exciting. Congratulations again on your new location and the concerted efforts of everyone in your group to save a little bit of the past for the future. We're prepared to allow you at this time to display the memorabilia we purchased from Bianchi. We're impressed with the overall organization that you've demonstrated but we have a couple of concerns that we would like you to consider. Although Liz Pascoe's generous donation is appreciated by everyone, we are concerned the= a conscientious effort be continued to secure a permanent location for the museum and the artifacts. We are aware that certain avenues are already being considered for a future permanent site and we hope that this problem will remain a priority item for your group until a satisfactory solution has been found. Should the year come to an end without resolve as to the permanent location of the Old Town Temecula Museum, we would like to be assured that proper and safe storage will be made available for all of the museum pieces. Until such time as a permanent location is secured, we will retain ownership. Kaiser would also lik~ to continue to display the Vail Bell and the historical blow-ups of the area in the new Rancho California Information Center until such time as you have more room. The bell and photos produce a great touch with the past for our newest visitors to the Temecula Valley. Your effort and immediate success demonstrate that the Old Town Temecula Museum's future is in capable hands with folks who care -- ilRNCHO CR!,,IFOFINI]:I Ms. Nancy J. Maurice December 5, 1985 Page 2 continued success and good luck. Please contact Kaiser to arrange a date for delivery of the artifacts currently in storage. Sincerely, Sherry Pr~sock~ Manager, Community Relations and Advertising : Allan McDonald President, Overland Bank SP/AM:br THIS LI#( FOl IILCC)II0~11 S USEI BILL OF SALE Frontier Museum Historical Center, Temecula. California es. el. el. el. el. 14 el. el. es. es. Wlva~W4c~ask~a~ea. reca~ldw~e~JWe~lKkhmMlgle.~eamJm OVErt. AND g~X and Xaise~ ~R OeveloDment Company, Tem~ula, California 5'~9' diotima of Tem~ula Townsite w/Dl~tic e~l~re and taDle mount Vail Ranch ~ddl~ Vail Rash Dell Vail Rash ~r~ collars Vail Ranch "No Hunting" sign ~isioficil DhO~O tourill 20~ x 8' w~n exhibit Dlltfo;m wain el~tricll system 24"x~"x40" enU~ue ~wciN Wishester cifOine, clli~r 3~ C=I~ Sin~le .~!=n .~r~7 revolvnf, .~. ? 11~" ~lt ~ ~ Vail collection of Sam Hicks ~r~nal mement~ coll~ilon of ~arle Si~nley GatSaner ~f~l memorYilia coll~ticn of a~r~K Temecula memorabilia For a to~al value of S23,~ (~e A~enaum on Toial ~le value S20,~ reverse s, ae ) ~~ x X X X ~ x X x X y w x ~ x w X x x w XX X~ Y Y Y Y Y~,N~N~X~,~X~~XX January 23, 198S STATE OF CALIFORNIA CQUNTY M Rives'si~ 0~ this 23rd day d January Jonn E..B:Lancnz ADDENDUM Certain articles donated end/or outright gifts to '~e Frontier Museum Historical (:enter contained in this Bill of S~Ii are I:~ing tr&nsferr~d by virtue of thai document, without chaf~. However, a ~ominll vliue hes ~ plK~:I on tM restorltiofi, $torlff, insurance, historical re.arch. ~wclsing~ a~ curator ~rvic~ during ~ time ~t ~ artif~ were ~ing maintain~ Fr~tier Mumm Historical Center. ~y are ~it~ ~ing transferr~ wit~ m value t~eto for the Ict~l ·rticles. T~ Fr~tier Mu~um Historical C~tlr ~rewith contri~ut~ t~r~ thou~n~ ~ollars ($3,~) of t~il value to ~ ~t~ from the S23,~ vlluation on the artifacts. t~r~y leaving a ~t ~ynDle ~l~l of twenty thou~ ~11ars ($20,~). Valuation· ire as follows: ! u. Viii ranch saddle, owned by Mehion Viii, with stand and accessories S 1,500 1 el. Vail ranch uddle, with stand end ic¢~rJes S 1,000 (both sadcUes completely restored) I el. Viii ranch bell. restored anti mounted on a brass/walnut stand S I.O00 Iea. Viii ranch "No Hunting" sign S 50 2 el. Vail ranch Ix)tie Collars, restored and made into mirrors S SO0 14 ea. historical photo murals S 1,590 1 ea. antic=up showcase, 24"xg~"x447* $ 800 1 el. 20'xa' platform, wooden, wil~ electrical system S 600 1 el. 5'xg° c~ioram~ of Temecula Town~ite w/ enclosure and table mount $ 12,000 AS ltlted al::)ove, i nominal vllue his I:)len i:)licecI on restoration, etc. of items no listed in the iIx)ve valuations S 3,960 valuation S 23,000 Gontrit~tion ( 3,O00) Net valuation The following items are al:)l)raisecl fo~ reference purgeses only and not: as · pert of this sale statement valuation: Collection of Sam :-licks i:mr~a; .'nementos Collection of Eirle Stanley G&rclner memento~ Miscellaneous Temecula memor~ile Colt $,A.A. revolver & Winchester .carbine 2.0C)0 5,0O0 1,000 1,500 [~tl :. .:. . . .,~, .... _. ..... ~.~,**.-~ :~. ~ ..if--. Temecula Museum officially"_o'p _ ~- ~ ENTRANCE-', · ~,' ~L" ·~ ~.~~ ~'~-' ~ "'~ ~~ ' ~ ~ · --' .'-~ : '. : ~ :. 7-: ..' .~ J; '" ~M : ,- - : ~ , - ~ ~'~ . , . ) : . RIBBON CU~ING te e~n ~ Md Town Tem~M ~sium : ~: HI-~ .~__~:vm~.:m~l~.UN M h'~iMi~ Is king ~ted by~ : .~., m ~y wls man e wrl~ fi~i~ mem~ :. .~.~ . . ~:,~_-~ . ~.. .-- : ~-- ' ;,: ,",-g ;":" ~ I ,. ' ' ' '- - - · : ~ _q~A,.,'~ ...., · . . . ~, . ~USING GIANT ~IS~RS to ~ ~ ri-~ te'e~'h " ~ · 6 , -:. ,;-~ . ~ ~ , ./ . --- . =--~.- , ..... , ',,,. -~ . ~ . .. Millfill I1~1~1~ I~tll ~ ~I fll ftll M~.n It I~ rltN. c~l.I · ~ ~~ i~ re~t~ ~ Prat S~Ht H E OLD TOWN TEMECULA MERCHANTS ASS.O,C. IATlON'recently donated S30~ to the Temecula Museum as a start in the museum s building fund~ The &O-member merchants association Is working to preserve old town's buildin "To let It · would be, crime" ai ' g_s and atmospher.e. · g , s d Katherine Hanson, secreta of t assoc~ation. The Old Town Temec I . ,.~,..,. ,, .... , .......ry _ .he mercha.n. ts u a M.r......l, ,,,),~,lnon Iormea mreo monms a~go, and they meet the first Wednesday of each month. Pictured are (I to r): Boa and Bob Taylor, Katherine .Hanson,. Mary Davis, Ray Meyer and Nancy Maurice. : OLD TOWN T£biECULA MUSEUM ! ~,,--,~l.k~ ...... field $une 15, 1987 $§00 DONATED BY LOCAL HERCHANT TO OLD TOWN TEHECULA HUSEUH This past weekend the Panache Beauty Center hosted a -- Cut-A-Thou Bentfit for the Old Town Temecula Nuseum. Anthony and Aleta Wegscheider, owners of .~he shop, donated all supplies and the use of their shop all day for the event.. Their staff also'donated their time to.benefit the museum. , In :conjunction, Barb'e Balloon Alfaire donaced'helfum ball- oons' for the kids;'Rainbov.Balloon'donated the large hot air --,' balloon stationed in frohr.-of.the Beauty'Center,,Carl'Lyons. donated.mum'it and son$1.'throushtout the afternoon. The Grove '. Care donated hot chowder, Ginny $lh fer..:b ought down some.of her miniature-hgrses and'the.Outlaw Gun Fighters pu~ on shows Also, 'the'Temecula,Craft'League'-.paid'to' ~etLup their booths.'" at the site and that'money also went to"the,musium. ' ~useum Curator, Tony Tobi~'vas,~n' hand to answer questions about the museum 'and Board President, Ray'Hayer-was .there to help collect money for the hair cuts. Relieving R~y'we're volun- teers, Haureen Zoll a~d Nancy Naurice.. . : ~'t the'end'of the fun day, Anthony'and'lleta presented.... the museum with a check for $$00 to add to the newly established building,fund. ? o 'Old ~o~ Te~ecula:Mu- . . ~ ~ ~t..~' *." ee s I. · ~ ~ '~";~ ~!a - ..~-,--~'..'~,.~'~~ ,2~"~d' ~5d~h'~~] m~u~ m'i~!f e I': ' .. ,~s-~ .,c , -. -.,.. . ~. . . ... ..,, ., :'~ .. Women sOub,,~gccor~l~8. ~ . ,~ .; ~ ,t ~ .f~:..-::.~ ~...~ ~-~ .... ,:~ ..... HZ$% '" .~'.t,~ ,. --~,t~ ~ ~,' ': .... · 'Ray Meyer, pr~ldent of ~e ~um ~rd, they the museums program. .~i ....::......','.We couldn't open the · :%w..ithout them," Meyer snld. ;'-. :/~-.~.-,=',We rely .totally on .tile ~ '* he :..~: ;-4 TI~ Cllif~"n~lR Thurseay, June ~,, · . lu#erfield Squ~re. . - i CHECK ROl~ si,~flr the Old Tewn Temecula I. Ilstlrlcal Museum'l building fund, Is presented t~ Help Berger, president ef the museum laird ef directmrs,, center rlgM, by Offvii Mitterwelther, president of the Temecuctl Valley Garden Club, center left, while members of the Garden Club leek on. The Garden Club members end their hus~nds raised the mepey at a very successful lwl-dey rummage and yard sale in Teme ula' Gard. n. 'Club.earns ': for Old :Town'iMuseu.m 000. ... · , · ~. . ... ! ', '"- ''--Sl.111~ Ills ~ firil day's ule was m ",.--'- · aT ..... · ...... n~. m we women memoels ,.,m, r.~,,.,, member1 dlcidld to '~n4'- .am.me wm ~ coulan c TE34EC1J~ -- Tim Tamcub . ..~,, K ........... . usd,.,..~.l u,...-- ,d,.. ,, i ~ ~t ~ Illii.'11~ ~ clmla me rummage &ale ~. :'- .T-,~."f~,L ....:-' '" · endre. · .., ~. -.-~. .'~Item ~ ~ad fofia born d~.~." .. .................. S® seeeessfel 'veref'~lle ~ai~ ~ ~ busband. . lit · _qriil I ~ ~ . . ,o.~ ~W eL.a---, ~ · .... ~ .,___ 9--1. -- u-- el ~ n~ ~l~ll~ ~M~ ~. ~ S~. J~ -~ · - ps. Sheri ~Jchard. I ~ ' ' f~ ' " ~ "'~' ' .... " ~~. . . ...- ~. · ., .. . . ~Mh~~.. ~ ~. ....,.: .: . . ~thdt~cal~mm. · _ "~.,,,,. ~u-, ..': l- ..r~_.tauraat karl ~tt~d Irma. ~. Tg}IKC~ -- hm N~. m~ di~" ~ ~ ~.-. ' dirKtot ~dt~ d ~ ~ ~y ~i~ ~ Wi~ Y~vM ~ ;.Town Temecula Histori~i May~ · a. ~; ~. ,. :- . ......:.~. · ~u~um~d~m.~ · ~I~M~ - - .:~,-", r. · .~rd ~m m, p~ml~'.~ 's= ~ ~. ~'~. . ::'.':-~-'.~ -: - ,~ plaque '~ ~ ~ HelO '~ ~ T~ ~ ~ ". ',./;:.::.' .: -' -'~ ... · -3.~]~. ~ ~n~ .. ~.'?MuInn aloal vi~ ff~y.. ;~- ;'":- - ..,~=.':. u~ a.,~ .~ ~' ..:Th.'.,U~...,,...t;, to" % ~ ~ ~ ' ,. ' ' ;'~ . ~Aave mm me awaro. ~H~ ~""'~ a~ *~ - ' ~ · · ~ ~ . s~ndo~lf~~ ~'.a~f~W~ ' ~ ~- ~--= : '~~ · )~e mumm for overayurina ~;;. 9 ...... i. u~.,..~ ,;~ : ~ .... ~ , ~~ · J~uamml next to a ~ s~ u~ ,. - '- · ' ~ ~ - ·, h'. ~ -~ :' ~ ~ ' "~ ow~ ~ Fret S~L --. '"~ .... ,' ' ?--_"~-:' ~: '.-, ' ' · ' '~ .-= ......., ;'~' -' ~ ' "-'~ :"~"He ~ ~- ~at~ ~.~----~ ~ ~ ~ · ' ~ '- ~ ~7~'~'-'~-~;'=;' -' · · · ; ........ ~'~~ ab f~: ' ';: ~c'~['.:~-"~c~ '~'. ~,~d,.~..~,,~ ~ ~ ....... ~..~J~ . ~ .~ ~,.,., ..,..-,,, .~.,.:~,.., · ' used for the repairin[ of "~~,~t~ ' ~ J..-~ ,~t:'~'~:~,:~'m.~;:~:~ -- ~i~ at him ~ ~ '~"~g~l~~ '-' &?",:"'.';% ' ' ~ [~ ~,~:,~'~ ~"~ ?'=.= ~'.~.O. · hab b"_ -~ -= h ~ ~ ~ b . GOR IO BY MUS !UM la: I wek was Sam Hasbro, wt ~uN f~ ~ ~ uid ~t* .' .~ ~ ~ way ; _ .~ Is ~ ~~ ff ~. museum:' Ha~on re~ovate ~.~a~ · ...~:.v ~ m~~~ ....... .... -~t ~ ~m~ ~.-~'~ ~u ~ k. ~nesday, June 21. 1989 '.Museum .draws · -- ' · ****' ' " ' '* *' *** .~lg · '**'**' '* ~*: *~ '--** :'--*" '*'." 'll -Museum were '$~ttered ~'last .. . c_.,Dnstructl.o..n. IS · - ...... : ..... . ........ *'* I I IU~UI I I UUllUll i~j cl1,-{ *.~,. .,..Calllorala res~denis. ~,, ......._,,,,~,.~.~..~,;-..~;...~.. ..:~.. ......, . .. ......., Sam H~cks...,...:....~,. --,' ..'.' 'Forel~ .'..visitors came:?from .~',~,. · :-.. ,-.. -, ......-~,.-..-~,..:,-,,--~. ~, .... ~-. ., - .:. .~ :.._' ~ ...... .;; ...~,.. ~..,.~. · ,^!beale, ~'U~!ia, Canada, Costa. ?'.Mo ument Park... " · .' France, -..West Germany,. [teland,':: wn~re'tne nls[orlc ':-;-.-:,~.. Kenya, Mexico, New Zealan~]; and' -'" .....;' ........~" ' .... So,th ^~,~c,. ' .....:"St/-.Catherines.'_. ......... TI~e Onited Statis' visit6~s Ch0rch wilil serve. hailed from 27 different states," , · as~he '" :~" ':." }Ilstory buffs maye new .'.::'/: museum,. wblclt is entirely staffed '"' mus.~um'$--- ,:..., .... p.m. Wednesday aroul!~ 'Sunday:" ~' entrance. ~.~....' ...--._.. .... .:Front SL, 'next to Sam's. Shell Sta; L' '."?~-:' ' · ':' . U.b.~.... :...- . .;.~.,; :::~-~]~ ..=... · :~'e. -~aiu!t8 ~e'start 'or co'nst~c; · .:?. '~. More museum volunteers are :-. Uoo'~_..f a'aew;~"u~euiii' build!El a{ '.needed, as'tell as a':VOlunteer .:.'Sam:~,HlCks .... .asked to call ~ .~-~).. 3! :,mel~_.~lill~_ass 16 sere .dai'la~; i'd'pat,. ,~aa.·.Will .-~.~o. d :be .set ·mi':lts -. vtslt.35 ~e ~eu~.' :.'.:..-"?*.-.~,~v.~:~ '.r~.. e~:t "(~'ati,~6a to':'.'lacrease,' : Sale to benefit museum' · . :. The Press-EJ~terpris4 ·" ....' The rummage .~le to benefit the"Old Town yesterday was one for .the ages. ~ . ..:...: . .~..,...,-~...... :- All .day, dozens of people of many ages bused around the' · ;-~remecula Market parking lot, going througJ~ old clothes,'appli-: ,.-. ance~ furniture, toys and books of all ages, ......... ... .... ,-. Funds from the fourth annual rummage sale will benefit the '"~;Temecula Museum Foundation. :-':- .....= ..... · .' -', '...~' The 4-year.-old museum has .been In': cramped quarte~"on. Front Street .and In' Butterfield 'Square ~ne b10~k~:sSuth;"~'.Mid'.' · · i '-..'.~ J~m~,b ~..~...-.,'.~j.- musetim curator .Tony ?ob!m. '~ ....~. ....., . ..-,...~ · Olivia· Mltterwallner .coordinated .the-sale fr~m '~i~!er' her. · "~'~t~aW bat, bartei-lng with buyers whenever ~e ~conld.' ::the goods from Srneller jarage sales and hust~esS~...ch~i.rc,b.'~'~d,.:. "service or~nLT, atJons.' ~-~'". --.:.:~=~ ::.~j~":-~?: .:~.':'."".'~ · ~?. One shopper;-P, ernest Burrows,'.fou~d"&~ bid ~ilver.-pleted.ice.~ ~ bucket :_with a -~cererrdc ~ lining "that'.h~ plans to ~convert into/e'.r .: ..~ ~!t s the only .tJ]lng tl~t .tascineted..me here, .-mid Burro, ws,~. ...... . . , ........ , · *~.. ~.,. .--~ ..~ .... 'W ,I :.. ~ · ?" ..-~'.-, ~" :.- .', ~ h ~likes.to o,to .lare~e seles otten~ ....... ._~__ -.~ .., . ~?. ....'l'be found.etlon .Is prepsring to kick oft a tund~r~lstng cem- ':pafgn to reise.~.$350,0oo for a new, 3.200-square-foot museum tn "; Sam Hicks Monument l~rk. :~ - ~ .The 70-year-old St. Cethertne's Cl~urch building wes moved in ~May 1989 from'its ~ori~lnal site on Sixth and Front streets .to :~.'Moreno Road and Mercedes Street near the park. ..... : Foundation members hope to refurhisl~ the church' and build ~ large addition. to house the aew Old Town Temecula Museum.' 4~ Robert j. Fitch ~11 Argyle Way Rivesside, Cdifomla 92.506 (714) 683.~346 February 21, 1991 Temecula Museum P.O. Box 792 Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: I have been appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to chair the 1993 County Centennial Advisory Board/Foundation. I am working with a 25-member Advisory Board appointed by the Board of Supervisors in planning and coordinating activities throughout the County to celebrate the County's 100th birthday. The celebration will commence in the fall of 1992 and continue through to the actual birth date of May 9, 1993. We request that any events or activities planned during this period of time by your organization include a recognition of the County's Centennial. You may also wish to schedule a special event for this important occasion. We will be most pleased to assist you in any way we can. let me know how this may be possible. Please Centenntally yours, Robert J. Fitch April 1, 1991 Becca: Cynthia Crain, 676-4368, called me today about her 14 year old daughter, Carmen, doing some volunteer work at the Museum. Carmen is a freshman at TVH$ and is a history buff and is also studying photography. She is facinated by our local history and has read Tom Hudson's book from cover to cover. She would like to come into the Museum and assist the regular docents on duty in whatever way she can. Would also like to meet Glen Travis and talk photography. I told Cynthia I would bring this to your attention. want to pass the word along to Barbara. Hat ker You may ! ernardinc County tuseums aturday, tay 4, 8:30am 9:00am 9:15-10:15am 10:15-10:45am 10:45-11:45am Noon-1:15pm REGISTRATION and Continental Breakfast WELCOMING REMARKS William E. Cunningham, Councilmember, City of Redlands GENERAL SESSION Strategies for Success Bruce A. Altman, City Manager, City of Palm Desert Ron Loveridge, City Council, First Ward, City of Riverside William E. Cunningham, Councilmember, City of Redlands Moderator, John Holmes, City Manager, City of Riverside Coffee Break GENERAL SESSION Making Government Work for You David McE!roy, Director, Riverside County Economic Development Agency Balph Megna, Deputy Director of the Development Department, City of Riverside Vi Hamner, Moreno Valley Historical Society Mike Dombrowski, Planning Commissioner, San Bernardino County LUNCHEON Keynote Address: 'Update on Statewide Issues for Museums' Elizabeth B. Smart, Curator, Statewide Collections Development, Office of Interpretive Services, California Department of Parks and Recreation ~,, .~,ir~ua~d cauiFomia museum co~so~rium~ Strategies Success The Seventh ~nnual Conference cf the Inland California Museum Consortium San I~emardinc County ~useums !~edlands, California Presentations and Workshops designed to assist in the management and operation of cultural institutions co-sponsored by:. EDWARO-OEAN MUSEUM OF DECORATIVE ARTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUMS FRIENDS OF THE EDWARD-DEAN MUSEUM SAN aF. RNAROINO COUNTY MUSEUM MUSEUM OF N~STOR¥ AND ART, ONTA~O RNEmOE MUNiCiPAL MUSEUM CAUFORN~A ASSOC~ON OF MUSEUMS RIVe'RSiO~= MUSEUM ASSOC~TES 1:30-3:00pm 3:30-5:00pm 5:00pro WORKSHOPS (1) Strategies to Develop Your Institut/onal Profile Barbara Flemming, Deputy Director, San Bernardino County Museum George McGinnis, Professor of Design, California State University, San Bernardino (2) Strengthening Educational Coalitions Marclie Wright, Ed. D., Assistant Supertendant/Secondary Education, Instructional Services, Moreno Valley Unified School District Zonith Overby, Principal, K]mbark School Connie Cowan, The Indio Film Project, Coachella Valley Historical Society WORKSHOPS (see 1:30 schedule) Wine and Cheese Reception Inland ( alifcrnia tuseum Consortium ( atherin Registration Fee (includae ¢ontinentaJ breakfast, conference, luncheon): S2S.CX) Stuaent Rate (with IO): SlO.00 --WORKSHOPS ONLY Name AcIdr~ Name Total fell enclosed (checks plylbfe to/C, SK3: $ C~e~it ca~d$ not a¢ceptld Send registration to: S&'I Bema/dino CQwW Museums, Ittn: Divi~Qn of I'illQcy 2024 Orange Tree L.Ine, I~Klla~ld~, CA ~2374 The Seventh Annual Conference of the Inland California Museum Consortium May 4, lg91 San Bernardino County Museums, Redlands, California Caiifomi& Street offramp from Interstate 10 · ~s. L.os .a~geles I-I0 1-10 I I .......... PQmonl I:wy ~0 I I I County Museum 1-10 7g N Home! I [~.IVER$IDE COUNTY MUSEUM DEPARTMENT .O~ARD-DEAN MUSEUM OF ~CO~VE ART C~SY VALLEY, C.~LIFO~I.~ 92~0p SHIPME~T AUs HUR~, .'ON 7 II II -- II II 'q II * I! II 13 II ~ II ~ II II II II I~ II * II O~ II ~ II ~ II II It II ~ II (~ II II ~ II II 11 * II ~ II ~ II t~ II II II II ',.4 II ~ II ~ II ~ II II O~ II II II ~ II t30 II II * II 0 II II II ff- -e 0 II1 ~ I,,I 0 t~ 0 0 000 000 0~ ~00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 -j ._-. ,_-, ,_-, ._-. ;.~ ;.. ;... ....,. ;.. '11 ,-, ,_-, ;..' sotos '~/~itto '~emee~.a, ~sdi~otnia 92390 COMME~CIAI. BUILDING 41950 Main Street Temecula, California Building size: 2200± sauare feet Lot size: 50 x 150 - 7500 square feet Parking: Additional 50 x 150 souare feet adjoining parking lot, fully fenced and paved. 10 spaces on building lot; 16 on adjoining lot. Building is newly remodeled, air conditioned and insulated, fully carpeted. 2 bathrooms, 2 front doors and 2 rear doors. Owner desires to lease building as a single unit at the rate of $1.35 per square foot, for a total monthly rent of $2,970.00. Owner will pay property taxes, fire insurance on structure and water. Electrical, gas, and maintenance of parking lot to be paid by leasee. Owner may consider dividing the building into two units of 1100± square feet each. Each unit would have one bathroom, one front and rear door, and separate electric meters, air and heating systems. Cost of maintaining parking areas would be shared equally. Unit A (next to two story building) would rent for $1.35 per sauare foot, or $1,485.00 per month. Unit B (East side with bay window) would rent for $1.48 per square foot, or $1,628.00 per month. The building was designed for a possible split, and it will take approximately seven working days to install the divid- ing wall. A minimum two-year lease is required. Owner: Loyd A. Sever 30105 Cabrillo Avenue Temecula, CA 92390 714/676-9249 City of Temecula: June 12, 1991 Proposal to sell improved property located at 41950 Main Street, Temecula, California, legally described as follows: Lots 23, 24, 25 and 26 in Block 19, Townsite of Temecula, as shown by map on file in Book 15, page 726 of Naps, records of San Diego County, California. Price: $620,000.00 Terms: 1. All cash. $10,000.00 security deposit, 60-day escrow, balance of $610,000.00 at close of escrow. Buyer and Seller each to pay normal and customary charges. No real estate brokerage commission. 2. Price to include all the artifacts owned by Mr. Tobin which are currently on display at the Temecula Museum, and which will be donated by the Sever Family to the Temecula Museum Foundation. Value is estimated at over $25,000.00. 3. Artifacts now owned by Mr. Tobin and stored in his warehouse will also be donated to the Museum Foundation by the Tobin Family. Value is estimated in excess of $10,000.00. Itemized appraisal to be provided by Mr. Tobin. 4. Donations are subject to the guidelines as set forth by the Museum Foundation and any other State and Federal laws governing such donations. 5. Time is of the essence. 5:00 p.m., July 3, 1991. This proposal expires at 30105 Cabrillo Avenue Temecula, CA 92390 676/9249 THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box 792 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0021 (714) 676-6329 (Curator) June 24, 1991 Hr. Karl Lindemans Councilman City of Temecula 43172 Business Rark Drive Temecula, California 92390 RE: Temecula Huseum Dear Hr. Lindemans, Today, the Executive Board of the Temecula Huseum met for further discussion of our tentative move to a new location. Your solution, contained in the correspondence to Sam Hasson dated, June 21, 1991, was carefully scrutinized. However, in the final analysis, the Executive Board does not agree with your plan. Hr. Hasson has been most generous in his donation to the growth, and yes, the survival of the museum. Although, he agreed to extend the lease, at your request, and under your proposal, we feel the time for change is now. There are serious concerns regarding the limitations of remaining in our present location. Oursincreased attendance shows that we must put our five year plan into effect immediately in order to meet the challenge of maintaining interest, increasing and varying our displays, and receiving more valley artifacts. (This untapped inventory of history will disappear if we do not expand and accept them now.) From a liability standpoint, our artifacts, docents, and visitors are at an increased risk due bo the proximity of gasoline pumps, high vehicular traffic near the front door, oil spillage, and noise. We consider this to be environmentally unsafe for the future of the museum and its participants. We again appeal to you and all council members to unite in supporting our request for the "new" Old town location belong- THE TEMECULA MUSEUM Post Office Box 792 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0021 (714) 676-6329 (Curator) Page #2 ing to Mr. & Mrs. Lloyd Sever. We are asking for "limited", (not unending) support of this facility which may be achieved in a number of ways including, purchase, lease w/purchase option, and lease. Please join with us, as other city governments have with their museums, and together we wlll preserve the past of this most unique valley. Sincerely, F"~' , ,/ - ~4rs. Becca Na aya \ \ · President ~ 1st ¢Vice ~resident Board of Directors Board of Directors Mr. Dennis Frank Executive Secretary ¢ 7 Mr. Bill Harker ,Treasurer CC: All Council Members David Dixon, City Manager Mark Ochenduszko, Ass't City Manager ./-~-, ITEM NO. 16 APPROVAL ~~ FINANCE OFFICEr, S__ CITY MANAGER ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECUI A AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY JUNE 18, 1991 JULY 2, 1991 REVENUES FOR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council read by title only and introduce an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula regarding Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction. DISCUSSION: To assist local governments in the reduction of air pollution, the State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 2766 in September 1990. This legislation authorizes the imposition of an additional two dollar motor vehicle registration fee to fund the implementation of programs that will reduce emissions from mobile sources. The fee became effective on April 1, 1991 and increases to four dollars on April 1, 1992. Forty percent of the revenue from this fee will be available to Cities and Counties based upon their prorated share of the population, provided that they adopt an ordinance which does the following: Expresses support for the adoption of motor vehicle registration fees to be used to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the Air Quality Management Plan; Expressly requires all revenue to be spent to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles; Establishes air quality improvement trust fund to which the fee revenues will be deposited. Agenda Report - AQMD Ordinance Adoption Page 2. The South Coast Air Quality Management District has sent the City a model ordinance to be adopted. The attached ordinance is based upon that format. It is recommended that it be adopted. A TTA CHMENTS: Ordinance No. 91-_ Memo from SCAQMD FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $23,000 in revenues to City ORDINANCE NO. 91-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City of Temecula hereby finds and declares that: A. WHEREAS, the City is committed to improving the public health, safety and welfare, including air quality; B. WHEREAS, mobile sources are a major contributor to air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin; C. WHEREAS, air quality goals for the region established by state law cannot be met without reducing air pollution from mobile sources; D. WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) calls upon cities and counties to reduce emissions from motor vehicles consistent with the requirements of the California Air Act of 1988 by developing and implementing mobile source air pollution reduction programs; E. WHEREAS, such programs place demands upon the City's funds, those programs should be financed by shifting the responsibility for financing from the general fund to the motor vehicles creating the demand, to the greatest extent possible; F. WHEREAS, Section 44223, added to the Health and Safety Code by action of the California Legislature on September 30, 1990 (Chapter 90-1705), authorizes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to impose an additional motor vehicle registration fee of two dollars ($2), commencing on April 1, 1991, increasing to four dollars ($4), commencing on April 1, 1992, to finance the implementation of transportation measures embodied in the AQMP and provisions of the California Clean Air Act; G. WHEREAS, forty cents of every dollar collected under Section 44223 of the Health and Safety Code shall be distributed to cities and counties located in the South Coast Air Quality Management District that comply with Section 44243 of the code, based on the jurisdictions' prorated share of population as defined by the State Department of Finance; 2/ORDS/028 1 H. WHEREAS, the City is located within the South Coast Air Quality Management District and is eligible to receive a portion of the revenues from the additional motor vehicle registration fees contingent upon adoption of this Ordinance; I. WHEREAS, the prorated share of the fee revenues for cities that fail to adopt an Ordinance pursuant to Section 44243(b)(3) of the Health and Safety Code shall be distributed instead to the jurisdictions within the District that have adopted an Ordinance; J. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City of Temecula, after careful consideration, hereby finds and declares that the imposition of the additional motor vehicle registration fee by the SCAQMD to finance mobile source air pollution reduction programs is in the best interest of the City and promotes the general welfare of its residents; SECTION 2. Intent. This Ordinance is intended to support the SCAQMD's imposition of the vehicle registration fee and to bring the City into compliance with the requirements set forth in section 44243 of the Health and Safety Code in order to receive fee revenues for the purpose of implementing programs to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. SECTION 3. Definitions. As applied in this words and terms shall be defined as follows: Ordinance, the following A. "City" shah mean the City of Temecula B. "Mobile source air pollution reduction programs" shall mean any program or project implemented by the City to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles which it determines will be consistent with the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the plan proposed pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 40460) of Chapter 5.5 of Part 3 of the California Health and Safety Code. his/her designee. "Fee Administrator" shall mean the Finance Director of the City or SECTION 4. Administration of Vehicle Registration Fee A. Receipt of Fee: The additional vehicle registration fees disbursed by the SCAQMD and remitted to the City, pursuant to this Ordinance, shall be accepted by the Fee Administrator. 2/ORD$/028 2 B. Establishment of Air Quality Improvement Trust Fund: The Fee Administrator shall establish a separate interest-bearing trust fund account in a financial institution authorized to receive deposits of City funds. C. Transfer of Funds: Upon receipt of vehicle registration fees, the Fee Administrator shall deposit such funds into the separate account established pursuant to Subsection 2. above. All interest earned by the Trust Account shall be credited only to that account. D. Expenditure of Air Quality Trust Fund Revenues. All revenues received from the SCAQMD and deposited in the Trust Fund Account shall be expended within one (1) year of the completion of the programs. E. Audits: The City consents to an audit of all programs and projects funded by vehicle registration fee revenues received from the SCAQMD pursuant to Section 44223 of the Health and Safety Code. The audit shall be conducted by an independent auditor selected by the SCAQMD as provided in Sections 44244 and 44244. l(a) of the Health and Safety Code. SECTION 5. Legal Construction. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be construed as necessary to effectively carry out its purposes, which are hereby found and declared to be in furtherance of the public health, Safety welfare and convenience. SECTION 6. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 8. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 9. A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted at City Hall. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of 2/ORD$/028 3 the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~ day of ,1991. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 2/ORD$/028 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) $S. I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 91-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1991, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NO~: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field City Attorney 2/ORD$/028 5 South Coast" AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 9150 FLAIR DRIVE, EL MONTE, CA 91731 (818) 572-6200 .. May 6, 1991 To Mayors and City Councilmembers in the South Coast Air Basin REVENUES FOR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The South Coast Air Basin has the most serious air quality problem in the nation. The majority of the pollutants - approximately 60 percent - are the result of mobile sources, mainly cars and trucks. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), in accordance with state and federal mandates, has the.primary responsibility to achieve and maintain healthful air quality in the region. Local governments can assist in the reduction of air pollution through their comprehensive planning authority and other authorities as business is conducted. To provide financial assistance for such activity, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 2766 (Sher) in September of 1990. This legislation authorizes the imposition of an additional $2 motor vehicle.re~,ristration fee to fund the implementation of programs that will reduce em_tss~ons from mobile sources. The fee became effective on April 1, 1991, and increases to $4 on April 1, 1992. Forty percent of the revenue from this fee will be available to cities and counties, based on their prorated share of population, provided that they adopt an ordinance which does the following: bExpresses support for the adoption of the motor vehicle registration fees to e used to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the Air Quality Management Plan; Expressly requires all revenue to be spent to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles; ano, Establishes an air quality improvement trust fund into which the fee revenues will be deposited. In addition, the local jurisdictions receiving fee revenues shall be subject, at least once every two years, to an audit of each program or project funded. Cities and counties are encoura.~ed to submit their ordinances at the earliest time to facilitate accounting and early disbursement of revenues. If a city or county fails to adopt an ordinance, the fee revenues which would be distributed to that city or county shall be distributed to the other cities and counties within the south coast district. The SCAQMD anticipates that the initial receipt of revenues wOl be in July or August of 1991. Approximately 30 to 60 days after receiving these funds, the SCAQMD will disburse to those local governments which .have approved ordinances their portion of the funds. .. Please find attached for your use and information a summ'ary of Assembly Bill 2766, a copy of the chal~tered bill (Chap. 1705 - Statute 1990), a copy of a draft Model Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Ordinance, and estimations of the vehicle registration revenues for each jurisdiction. If you have any questions regarding this issue or these materials, please contact Eugene L. Fisher, Intergovernmental Affairs Officer, at (818) 572-6409. cc: City Managers "ASSEMBLY BILL 2766 (SHER) MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION/AIR QUALITY RELATED ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICTS SUMMARY In September of 1990, Governor Deukmejian signed Assembly Bill 2766 into law. This legislation authorizes the imposition of an additional motor vehicle rel~istration fee to fund the implementation of air quality management plans and provisions of the C-alifomia Clean Air Act. PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS This bill authorizes that an annual vehicle registration fee of $2 may be imposed by a non-attainment air pollution control district or management district, upon the approval of the fee and a corresponding program to reduce vehicular air pollution by the l~overning board of the district. In districts with non-elected officials on the governing board, the fee and program must be approved by a majority of the board and also by a majority of the elected officials on the board. The registration surcharge would be applied to vehicles in the district which must pay annual registration fees. (Because of other applicable statutes, the Sacramento Air Quality Management District is exempt from this authorization.) This additional registration fee can become effective on April 1 or October 1, as provided in the district board's resolution. On and after April 1, 1992, a district may approve an increase of the fee to up to $4. This bill also requires that the Department of Motor Vehicles collect the fee and, after deducting an administrative fee of not more than 5 percent during the first year, distribute the revenues to districts to be used to reduce air polluuon from mobile sources. Within the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the District is required to disburse the revenues in the following rnnnrler: Thirty cents of every dollar shall be used by the SCAQMD for p. rograms to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles and to carry out planrung, monitoring, enforcement and technical studies which are authorized by, or necessary to implement, the California Clean Air Act. Forty cents of every dollar shall be distn'buted by the district to ciries and counties located in the South Coast District. The amount of revenue shall be based on the cities and counties prorated share of population and will be used to implement programs to reduce air ipollution from motor vehicles. before ' However, a city or county may receive these revenues, it must first express, in the form of an ordinance, support for the adoption of the motor vehicle registration fee, require that all fees distributed to it be spent to reduce mobile source air pollution and establish an air quality improvement trust fund into which all revenues will be deposited. Thirty cents of every dollar shall be deposited by the district in an account to be used to implement or monitor programs to reduce mobile source air pollution A regional Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee shall develop and adopt work programs that will be funded by the revenue in this account. .. At least once every two years, any agency receiving fee rev'tnues shall be subject to an audit of each program or project funded. II. ASSEMBLY BILL 2766 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The im.]plementation of Assembly Bill 2766 currently is a seven-step plan that begins immediately. The steps are detailed as follows: Develop a program (from the AQMP) for the reduction of air pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to, and for related planning, monitoring, enforcement and technical studies necessary for the implementation of, the California Clean Air Act. Take before the members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board a recommendation for a resolution to adopt the $2 vehicle registration fee beginninl/. on April 1, 1991, and the corresponding program for the reduction of mobile source air pollution. Board action could be taken at the November Board meeting and/or the January 1991 Board meeting. Upon adoption of the above-described resolution, the District should notify the Department of Motor Vehicles that the SCAQMD Board has adop. ted a resoluuon approving the $2 fee and that collection shall be~n on April 1, 1991. Monies will be sent to the SCAQMD on a monthly basis. Notify cities and counties that they are eligible for a portion of the revenues collected under SB 2766 and the details of this bill. Make cities and counties aware that the revenues will be distributed to them only after they have adopted an ordinance that expresses their support of the vehicle registration fee, their knowledge that the revenues may be spent only on reducing mobile source air pollution, and their establishing of an air quality 'unprovement fund into which the revenues will be deposited. A draft ordinance could be presented to each city or county to assist them in this process. Establish the regional Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee. It ~s recommended that this be done through the Interagency AQMP Implementation Committee. Prepare an acauate list of populations for each city or county for the distribution of the revenues. 7. Develop a distribution program for the SCAQMD. ESTIMATED ~Pd-iICLF-. REGISTRATION REVENUE (AB 2766) DISBUR~bfI~NT~ FOR " LOS ANGELF. S COUNTY FY 1991-92 TOTAL (I) POPULATION Agourn Hills Alhambra ..'u'c-',,di~ %rte$1a Baldwin Park 3~11 -%ilflow~r ktrbank ~ompto- ~h~ L'ul,/e r CRy 21 Monte :I Seg~o ]arena ~er~e G~ndom ~wa~an ~i~ Hills i~go8~ Park '-~~ ~ FI~c 19,850 76,000 49,800 15,000 2,470 38,600 63,800 28,650 61,300 38.$00 34.300 920 95,300 88,800 58,400 36,600 l 1,850 93 4OO 43 850 20 400 41 200 87 200 21 55O 95 900 16,000 51,200 174,800 47,900 12.500 67,800 19,650 1.980 52,000 37O 102,600 1,260 20,750 DI. S7'RIC~I' POP DOLI. AR5 ~/} 0.15% 0.57% 0.37% 0.11% 0.02% 0.29% 0.48% 0.22% 0.46% 0.29% 0.26% 0.01% 0.72% 0.67% 0.~% 0.27% 0.09% 0.70% 0.33% 0.15%: 0.31% 0.65% 0.16% 0.72% 0.12% 0.3~% 1.31% 0.36% 0.09% 0.51% 0.15% 0.01% 0.39% 0.00%. 0.77%. ' 0.01% 0.16% (1) CRY"/" · POPULATION $13,229 La Habta Heigh~ .5O,652 L~kewood 33,190 Ll Mirado 9,997 [Llne. ast~r · 1,646 ~ 2.5,726 :!l.~ Vern~ 42,521 }Lav~dale 19,094 iLomita 4o, s~ {Ling 613 ~Ma~n ~,515 38,~ !Mont~Uo 10,6~ 34,1~ Ro~ ~Us II&499 ~Roa~ ~Hs E. 45,187 ~Sm F~o 5,450 76.700 42.900 88 700 34. 150 31.750 27 650 20.950 419,700 3,433,600 54,400 35,100 24,800 34,900 59,300 65,800 91,600 56,5OO 15,000 45,700 133,900 58,300 121,600 46,050 65,100 2,000 7,825 48.200 33.050 20,650 35,700 13,650 121,200 16,400 96,900 11,250 8,175 ~ OF TOTAL:i:=~ . ~i '~::I'~'11.:.1 0.~ 0.58% 0.32~ 0.67 % 0.26% 0.24% 0.21 5 0.16~ 3.15~ ~.77~ 0.41%' 0.26~ 0.19% 0.26% 0.45~ 0.49 % 0.~% 0.42%. 0.11% 0.34~ 1.~%' 0.~% 0.35~ 0.49% 0.02~ 0.06~ 0.36~ ' · 0.~ 0.15~' o.~o~',' .. ~..~,~'! o.~ ~,=,', '. '. ~gi o.og~',, "' "...'.~;4~= 0.06~' '5~. si,ns{ 25;$92: 59;116 21;I60 m42s 279,718 2,298,399 ! 37,~6 ~,'~1 gl,~3 NAM~OF TOTAL (1) ~ OF TOTAL F. Sl'IZdAIw_D ~ POPULATION DI~TRICT IbOP DOg.tARS (2)! Soutit El Mont~ 18,800 0.14% South Gat~ 79,800 0.60~ South Pasadena 24,700 0.19~ .Temple City 32,400 0.24 % .Torrance · 142,500 1.07 % '" !Veraoa," $o o.00~, NA3d~ OF C~1~ . ' 16.462 iWeaHoaywo~X!' TOTAL (1) ~S OF TOTAL :POPULATION DI$7'RIC~ PODOr_t-4.RS 29,300 0.22% I9,52S 94,500 0.71 ~ 62,R82. 38,450 0.29~ 2,.q;626 i 8,575 0.06~ ' 5,715 75,600 0.57~'.:. ".:S0~$~5'. 1,027,800 7.71 ~,:f.. 8,769,945 (I) POPULATION DATA FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA "OFFICIAL STATE ESTIMATES' DATED MAY 1990 (2) REVENUE PROJECTIONS BASED ON ESTIMATED 1990 CALIFORNIA VEHICLE REGISTRATION FIGURES ..ESTIMATED VERICr.~ R~_.GISTRA TION REVENUE (AB 2766) DISBURSEMWNTS FOR RIVE~IDE COUNTY NAME.OF'" TOTAL (1) :~ OF TOTAL C2"]'Ir ' : POPrfLA TION DIS'I'i~C'I' POP. 20,950 9,975 $,425 31,750 14,950 70,000 11,200 35,650 2,720 36,000 15,950 11,850 114,900 25350 20.650 32,100 18,900 9,275 218,500 15,300 385,600 1,109,995 0.16% 0.07% 0.06% 0.24% 0.11% 0.53 % 0.08% 0.27 % 0.02% 0.27 % 0.12% 0.09% 0.86%' 0.19% 4 ,.I) POPULATION DATA FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'OFFICIAL STATE ESTIMATES' DATED MAY 1990 REVENUE PROJECTIONS BASED ON ESTIMATED 1990 CALIFORNIA VEHICLE REGISTRATION FIGURES ESTI.MATED VEHI~-P- R~_.GISTRATION REVENUE (AB 2766) DZSB~ FOR ORANGE COUNTY ~ OF TOTAL ESTIMATED 33,soo o.zs % 66,6oo 0.5o% '.: 31,2oo o.z3~ .... 56,400 o.42~ . 102,400 0.77%". · '~... 49,400 0.37 % ......... 2,325,150 (1) POPULATION DATA FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'OFFICIAL STATE ESTIMATES' DATED MAY 1990 (2) REVENUE PROJECTIONS BASED ON ESTIMATED 1990 CALIFORNIA VEHICLE REGISTRATION FIGURES .. ESTIMATED VEHICLE REGISTRATION ~ (AB 27~z5) SAdq BERlqARDIlqO COUNTY FY 1!;g)I-92 [Colin IYur.~i~ (3) i707'.A/~ . .'., TOT, aJ,, U) ~ oP TOT,~U., ~TED': POPULATION DISTRICT POP. DO~.r~.~$ ' ('2~:. 6,650 0.05% · $4,432,. 59,(300 0.45 % 3g,7"Z2 39,700 0.30% 26;459' 87,400 0.6~% 58~2~ l 1,400 0.09 % 32,750 0.25 %', 21,Irz7. ' 129,300 0.97%"" $6.175' 62,900 0.47 % 4'! (1) POPULATION DATA FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA "01~'ICIAL STATE ESTIMATES' DATED MAY 1990 (2) REVENUE PROJECTIONS BASED ON ESTIMATED 1990 CALIFORNIA VEHICLE REGISTRATION FIGURES SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ESTIMATES ITEM NO. 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager July 2, 1991 Item No. 16 - City Council Policy - Police Services PREPARED B~ City Clerk June S. Greek BACKGROUND: The staff will forward it to you under separate cover. JSG finalize the staff report on this item and TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FTNANCE OFFI%ER, CITY MANAGER ~ C/TY OF T£MECULA AG£NDA R£PORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DAVID F. DIXON JULY 2, 1991 TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ClP) FOR FY 1991-92 PREPARED BY: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the Board of Directors: Approve a Capital Improvement Plan (ClP) for FY 1991-92 for the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT.' A total of $6,950,000.00 has been approved by the Board of Directors for the CIP. DISCUSSION: At the June 10, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission listened to public testimony concerning the CIP for FY 1991-92. After considerable discussion, it was decided that not only should the Commission recommend a CIP to the Board of Directors, but also prioritize the projects based on their relative importance to the community. The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously approved and recommended to the Board of Directors the following CIP and priority list: 1. Acquisition of park land 2. Develop existing parks 3. Community Recreation Center/ Amphitheater 4. Parking - Sports Park 5. Community Pool $1,300,000.00 1,000,000.00 3,500,000.00 400,000.00 750,000.00 Total $6,950,000.00 Counq,' ~clmm. Ctr. ~EADOWVIEW AUTO ZIP CODE ~' 92?90 T~.CU~, E~ ~NCHOS ZIP CODE, 92390 EC"L ~IJd'TA 14, ESCI~t~ATA OR ,m ~ ~ .- ~ L. AZA~ ST 2'I. COIJ~ VERg~ CANYON VIU.AGE L M~lfy e'J' 1NESTERAS The Commission requested that staff analyze the most effective method in developing existing parks and constructing a swimming facility with the monies allocated, and report back to the Commission, If the CIP is approved, staff would like to proceed with the hiring of an architect to design the Community Recreation Center and Sports Park Parking; hire a landscape architect to design existing park sites; and coordinate with the Finance Department to develop bond financing for the CIP. Acquisition of land will be coordinated through the City Manager's office. Enclosed is a location map of existing TCSD properties and undeveloped site plans for each TCSD parcel: Kingsway (Rawhide) - 22.6 acres, and Riverton - 5 acres. '"'"'.' : :'-'.'~l~, '"' '. ' '. ~::~,~.../'~: t..~i.,,,~;;'.~ ".. '. ... :..:~ au*~. . '.z""'""~ · ". :'"~' '' ~1 ~' ~1 · i.~l.ltx~ ' ... ,I I ii ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL"'~_' FINANCE OFFIC~:K CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services District Board of Directors General Manager July 2, 1991 Cancellation of the Regular Meeting of July 9, 1991 PREPARED BY: City Clerk June Greek RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors officially cancel the regularly scheduled meeting of July 9, 1991. DISCUSSION: Chapter 2.04 of the City's Municipal Code requires regular City Council/TCSD Board meetings to be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Due to a League of California Cities meeting scheduled for July 9, 1991 which several Boardmembers plan to attend, it has become apparent that a quorum of the Community Services District will not be available on July 9, 1991. The Board took action to scheduled this adjourned regular meeting to replace that date and should by minute action cancel the regular meeting. APPROVAL FINANCE OFFIS ~...~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: DAVID F. DIXON DATE: JULY 2, 1991 SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACTS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE INC. LANDSCAPE WITH CALIFORNIA AND MACKENSIE PREPARED BY: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve amendment to contract with California Landscape Maintenance Inc. to provide continued landscape maintenance services for parks, slopes, and medains through August 31, 1991. Approve amendment to contract with Mackensie Landscape to provide continued landscape maintenance services for TCSD slopes through August 31, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT.' Cost to provide landscape maintenance services not to exceed $55,806.00. Unencumbered funds exist in the FY 1991-92 budget in account //019-190-999-42-5250 and//019-190-999-42-5510. DISCUSSION: The TCSD is in the process of releasing Requests For Proposals (RFP's) for landscape maintenance of slopes, parks, and medians for FY 1991-92. Proposals will be reviewed and the lowest, responsible bids will be submitted to the Board for approval at the August 20, 1991 Board of Directors meeting. AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 0162 The Agreement Dated January 2, 1991 between the City of Temecula, and California Landscaping, (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Re: CONTINUED LANDSCAPE SERVICES AMENDING ORIGINAL CONTRACT Section 1 Term of the Agreement is extended through August 31, 1991. Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $37,826.00. Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. --~ The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT By: By: CITY OF TEMECULA Ronald J. Parks, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/TCSD Secretary CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT The Agreement dated January 2, 1991 between the City of Temecula, and California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. (Hereafter the Agreement) is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 1 Term of the agreement is extended through June 30, 1991. SECTION 2 The Scope of Work is here by amended by adding the following areas to be maintained according to the same levels of service as is provided for in the Agreement. SCOPE OF WORK Outline of Included Services: Ao Mow lawns as often as required to maintain a neat appearance; once a week maximum. Edge lawns as often as required to maintain a neat appearance. All walks and driveways will be edged after each mowing. Planter beds and other less conspicuous areas to be edged every second or third mowing. C. Cleanup of all walks and other paved areas to remove grass clippings and other trash deposited while mowing and edging. A variety of methods such as sweeping, vacuuming, or blowing may be used. Weed all planter beds and ground cover areas completely once each month. This may be accomplished by a continual weeding program or by a once a month weeding of all areas at one time. Clean and adjust irrigation system as required to provide adequate moisture to all planting areas. Prune all trees and shrubs as required to maintain good form of growth and development of the plants. This will usually be accomplished by doing a minimum amount of thin pruning and shaping during the growth months (Spring and Summer) and heavy pruning and shaping in the Winter. All trees over 12' Tall are excluded from this contract and will be handled as "Extra Work". 2. Additional Included Services ho All fertilizers necessary to produce healthy growth and maintain good color in all planting areas. B. Control of minor infestation of insects and baiting for snails. C. Aerate all turf areas two (2) times annually. D. 24 hour emergency repair service. AI complaints from the public received during normal business hours will be responded to within 4 hours. 3. Services not included under Basic Contract: These services will be paid for as "Extra Work" by Owners unless specifically included in Included Services Section of the outline. A. Plant replacements, other than contractor negligence. B. Reseeding of lawn areas or overseeding for Winter color. Repair or replacement of automatic sprinkler controllers automatic or manual sprinkler valves, underground piping or any other component of the system including sprinklerheads and the pipe risers that connect them to the underground piping. Eo Repair of any deficiencies or conditions which existed on or before the effective date of this Contract. Correction of soil conditions such as Acid, Alkaline, or mineral deficiencies; hard pan conditions or other deficiencies other than those corrected by the use of fertilizer containing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Pot Ash. o o Extra Work: Extra labor and material, other than sprinkler head repair and tree stake replacement, will only be provided when authorized in writing prior to the performance of the work. go Sprinkler head repair and tree stake replacement may be performed by the Contractor without prior written authorization by the Owner for any amount up to 10% of Monthly Amount. Go Emergency extra work which must be performed to protect the Owner's property such as: Fallen trees, broken water lines, etc., may be preformed by the Contractor without prior written authorization by the Owner. Drainage Facilities A. Maintain all drainage facilities to avoid obstruction at all times. Personnel and Equipment: The Contractor will provide sufficient uniformed personnel and equipment to perform all work in a professional and workman like manner in keeping with generally accepted horticultural practices and techniques. The Contractor shall not be held to any minimum or maximum number of men or man hours. All crews will include an English speaking foreman and will be continuously supervised by a qualified Superintendent. C. All water restriction requirements will be fully complied with at all times. 7. Site Location Ao Temecula Sports Park Sam Hicks Monument Park La Serena Way Park Site Ridgeview Tract//20735 La Serena Way Villages II Tract//21672 & 21673 Various areas between Rancho California Road Villa Avanti Association, Tract 21674 & 21675. Rancho California Road & Rancho Vista Road. Compensation for servicing these areas shall be total compensation to maintain all areas described in the amendment and shall be payable at $18.913.00 per month. SECTION 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. Entire Agreement. This Addendum and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: CONSULTANT By: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk AGR5 5 AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 0161 The Agreement Dated March 13. 1991 between the City of Temecula, and MacKenzie Landscapi%, (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Re: ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES AMENDING ORIGINAL CONTRACT Section 1 Term of the Agreement is extended through August 31. 1991. Section 2 The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following: Landscape Services to include the addition of Saddlewood @ $1,895.00 Meadowview @ 265.00 Riverton @ 525.00 Total $2,685.00 Section 3 Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $17,980.00. Section 4 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: court ~. Field, Cityt~ Attorney ATFEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/TCSD Secretary AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 13th day of March, 1991, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and MacKenzie Landscaping, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: attached hereto. Exhibit A. SERVICES. Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in 2. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. 3. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $ 8.923.00~' for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000.00. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. invoice. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each 4. SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Contractor, the City shall pay Contractor for work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 5. BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Contractor to make progress in. the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not be considered a default. AGR4/ 2 If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor defaults' in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 6. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on Jalluary 1st, 1991, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30th, 1991. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Contractor arising out .of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. AGR4/ 3 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Contractor or any of the Contractor's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 9. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in AGR4/ 4 any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 10. NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92390 and the Contractor at MacKenzie Landscape. 27235 Watson Road. Suite A. P.O. Box 1238. Romoland. CA' 9239O. unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after' the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes. 11. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered. AGR4/ 5 12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Contractor shall maintain insu{ance acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against clai~ns for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: ho Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office form Nmnber GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001). Insurance Services Office form no. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code I "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025. o Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California an Employers' Liability insurance. AGR4/ 6 -- ~_ 4. Errors and Omissions insurance. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: General Liability $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $500,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $500,000 per accident. '4. --Errors and-Omissions Insmzmce. $~00~000~c~ recurrence. _.o.. ?~ C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. must be declared to and approved by the City. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 D. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: AGR4/ 7 a. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail. b. General Liability and Automobile Liability coverages. The City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Contractor's performance of the work described in this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Contractor's insurance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not AGR4/ 8 .... affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees o~ volunteers. The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. c. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the City. d. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the fight to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Contractor shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. AGR4/ 9 Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 13. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement AGR4/ 10 and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the' day and year first above written. CONTRACTOR By: (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney AWFEST: CITY OF TEMECULA By David F. Dixon, City Manager June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk AGR4/ l I SCOPE OF WORK Outline of Included Services: Mow lawns as often as required to maintain a neat appearance; once a week maxi mum. Edge lawns as often as required to maintain a neat appearance. driveways will be edged after each mowing. Planter beds conspicuous areas to be edged every second or third mowing. All walks ~ind and other less Co Cleanup of all walks and other paved areas to remove grass clippings and other trash deposited while mowing and edging. A variety of methods such as sweeping, vacuuming, or blowing may be used. Weed all planter beds and ground cover areas completely once each month. This may be accomplished by a continual weeding program or by a once a month weeding of all areas at one time. Clean and adjust irrigation system as required to provide adequate ~noisture to all planting areas. Fo Prune all trees and shrubs as required to maintain good form of growth and development of the plants. This will usually be accomplished by doing a minimum amount of thin pruning and shaping during the growth months (Spring and Summer) and heavy pruning and shaping in the Winter. All trees over 12' Tall are excluded from this contract and will be handled as "Extra Work". Additional Included Services A. All fertilizers necessary to produce healthy growth and maintain good color in all planting areas. B. Control of minor infestation of insects and baiting for snails. C. Aerate all turf areas two (2) times annually. D. 24 hour emergency repair service. E. AI complaints from the public received during normal business hours will be responded to within 4 hours. Services not included under Basic Contract: These services will be paid for as "Extra Work" by Owners unless specifically included in Included Services Section of the outline. A. Plant replacements, other than contractor negligence. B. Reseeding of lawn areas or overseeding for Winter color. Repair or replacement of automatic sprinkler controllers automatic or manual sprinkler valves, underground piping or any other component of the system including sprinklerheads and the pipe risers that connect them to the underground piping. Repair of any deficiencies or conditions which existed on or before the effective date of this Contract. Correction of soil conditions such as Acid, Alkaline, or mineral deficiencies; hard pan conditions or other deficiencies other than those corrected by the t~se of fertilizer containing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Pot Ash. o Extra Work: ho Extra labor and material, other than sprinkler head repair and tree stake replacement, will only be provided when authorized in writing prior to the performance of the work. Sprinkler head repair and tree stake replacement may be performed by the Contractor without prior written authorization by the Owner for any amount up to 10% of Monthly Amount. Co Emergency extra work which must be performed to protect the Owner's property such as: Fallen trees, broken water lines, etc., may be preformed by the Contractor without prior written authorization by the Owner. ~ Drainage Facilities A. Maintain all drainage facilities to avoid obstruction at all times. Personnel and Equipment: ho The Contractor will provide sufficient uniformed personnel and equipment to perform all work in a professional and workman like manner in keeping with generally accepted horticultural practices and techniques. The Contractor shall not be held to any minimum or maximum number of men or man hours. All crews will include an English speaking foreman and will be continuously supervised by a qualified Superintendent. C. All water restriction requirements will be fully complied with at all times. Site Location Cost Per Month A. Woodcrest Country - Tract 21561 & 22208 $ 700.00 B. Winchester Creek - Tract 20130 $1324.00 C. Vineyard - Tract 20879 $ 280.00 D. Rancho Highland - Tract 20643 & 20644 $1,620.00 E. Rancho Salano - Tract 22593 $ 140.00 F. Point Pavillion - Tract 18518 $ 900.00 G. Martinique ~ Tract 23128 $ 775.00 H. Margarita Road - Tract 21340 $ 499.50 I. Costain - Tract 20882-0,1,2,&3 $2,735.00 TOTAL MONTHLY COSTS $8,973.00 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~~_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Temecula Redevelopment Agency Executive Director July 2, 1991 Cancellation of the Regular Meeting of July 9, 1991 PREPARED BY: City Clerk June Greek RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the Redevelopment Agency officially cancel the regularly scheduled meeting of July 9, 1991. DISCUSSION: Chapter 2.04 of the City's Municipal Code requires regular City Council/RDA meetings to be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Due to a League of California Cities meeting scheduled for July 9, 1991 which several Agency members plan to attend, it has become apparent that a quorum of the Redevelopment Agency will not be available on July 9, 1991. The Agench took action to scheduled this adjourned regular meeting to replace that date and should by minute action cancel the regular meeting.