The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About022516 PTS Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting[28 CFR 35 102,35 104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2016, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Richardson FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Hage[ ROLL CALL: Carter, Coram, Hagel, Mann, Richardson PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes Is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak"form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time A total. not to exceed. ten minutes will be devoted to these reports CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendarfor separate action 1 Action Minutes of January 28. 2016 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of January 28.. 2016. 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Nighthawk Pass Traffic Calming - Revisited RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Recommend the implementation of Phase 1 — "Bulb-outs" on Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street, Channel Street and Easterly Subdivision Boundary; and 2.2 Direct Staff to coordinate the removal of landscaping on Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street and Channel Street with the property owner and Homeowner's Association. 3. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday. March 24, 2016, at 6.00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet(including staffreports)will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area al the Temecula C ivic Center(41000 Main Street, Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website-www.cityoftemecula.org-and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda,alter the posting of the agenda.will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(4 1000 Main Street,Temecula,&W AM-5:00 PM). In addition. such material may he accessed on the City's website-www citvottemecula ore-and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Iryou have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting,please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center. (951)694-6411. 2 ITEM N4. 1 Action Minutes of January 28, 2016 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, JANUARY 28, 2016, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Coram (6PM) FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter ROLL CALL: Carter, Hagel, Richardson, Coram PRESENTATIONS: None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of October 22, 2015 - Approved staff recommendation (4-0-0) with a motion made by Commissioner Hagel and seconded by Commissioner Carter. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Carter, Hagel, Richardson and Coram. RECOMMENDATION: 1 1 Approve the Action Minutes of October 22, 2015 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. RequestforTime Limited Parking Restriction Program-RitterCourtand DorsetCourt -Approved staff recommendation(4-0-0)with a motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Richardson. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Carter, Hagel, Richardson and Coram. RECOMMENDATION That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. 2.1 Recommend the City Council approve the implementation of a parking restriction program on Ritter Court from 9 AM to 12 PM. Monday through Friday. except Holidays, and 22 Maintain the existing on-street parking on Dorset Court. 3. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson - Nomination and motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Coram to elect Commissioner Richardson as Chairperson. Approved staff recommendation (4-0-0) with individual voice vote reflecting approval by Commissioners Carter, Hagel, Richardson and Coram. Nomination and motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Coram to elect Commissioner Hagel as Vice Chairperson. Approved staff recommendation (4-0-0) with individual voice vote reflecting approval by Commissioners Carter, Hagel, Richardson and Coram. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to preside through the 2016 calendar year. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT-The meeting adjourned at 6:33 PM with a motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Hagel. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, February 25, 2016, at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. David Coram Mayra De La Torre Chairperson Senior Engineer 2 ITEM NO. 2 Nighthawk Pass Traffic Calming - Revisited AGENDA REPORTo*Ts�,p TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 1989 FROM: j� Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 25, 2016 SUBJECT Item 2 Nighthawk Pass Traffic Calming - Revisited Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the implementation of Phase 1 — "Bulb-outs" on Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street, Channel Street and Easterly Subdivision Boundary; and 2. Direct Staff to coordinate the removal of landscaping on Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street and Channel Street with the property owner and Homeowner's Association. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from Nighthawk Pass residents to reevaluate the effectiveness of the existing traffic calming features (striping) and consider other traffic calming features to reduce vehicular speeds. The residents expressed concerns that the existing measures had become ineffective at reducing vehicular speeds along Nighthawk Pass and additional measures were needed. At a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop held in August 2015, Staff presented potential traffic calming measures that would address the resident's concerns about vehicular speeds. The alternative traffic calming measures developed included intersection "bulb-outs", chicanes, bike lane buffers, and traffic circles at Choate Street and Channel Street. The five (5) workshop attendees preferred a "stepped" approach to implementation of the traffic calming features beginning with the intersection "bulb-out" and chicanes and eventually moving to traffic circles if the first alternatives proved to be ineffective at reducing vehicular speeds. In December 2015, Staff presented the traffic calming features to the HOA Board of Directors, along with the preferred alternatives, for their consideration. The Board of Directors expressed that their preferred traffic calming feature was the bike lane buffer feature, which eliminated on- street parking on the south side of Nighthawk Pass. However, the Board of Directors indicated that they would defer to the wishes of the community and Staff's recommended traffic calming feature. It was also suggested at the meeting that multi-way stop signs be considered at the intersections of Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street and Channel Street. In January 2015, vehicular volume data was collected at both intersections for a three (3) day period. In addition to the data collection, a review of conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis. i An evaluation of sight distance revealed the visibility at both intersections is appropriate for conditions and speeds. The visibility could be enhanced with the removal of existing landscaping on the southwest corner of Choate Street at Nighthawk Pass and the southeast corner of Channel Street at Nighthawk Pass. The adjacent homeowner at each location is responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping. Staff will coordinate the removal of the landscaping with the individual homeowner and HOA. A review of the collision history for the twelve (12) month period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, indicates there were no reported collisions at the intersections. The favorable record is attributed to driver familiarity with roadway conditions and exercising due care when entering and travelling through the intersections. The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets' warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at both intersections. The warrants allow for the installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three-hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day and b) The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one-hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a) Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Roadway Characteristics a) The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, b) The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, c) The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and d) Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. WARRANTS 1, 2, and 3 MUST BE SATISFIED Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a) The intersections sight distance is less than: • 155 feet for 25 MPH • 200 feet for 30 MPH • 250 feet for 35 MPH 2 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs for the residential area. The Multi-Way Stop warrant analysis performed at both intersections indicates that Warrants 1, 2, and 3 are not satisfied and multi-way stop signs are not justified. Additionally, an evaluation of the optional criteria, such as intersection sight distance, indicates there are no special circumstances that justify the need for right-of-way control provided by multi-way stop signs. The results of the current warrant analysis are consistent with the results of the warrant analysis performed a few years, which indicated that multi-way stop signs were not justified at that time. As previously mentioned the consensus of the residents is to implement traffic calming measures that includes bulb-outs, chicanes and more aggressively, traffic circles, if the first two features do not achieve the desired results. In order to make the chicanes and/or traffic circles more effective the residents suggested the implementation of a physical improvement, such as a raised asphalt berm, in lieu of striping. Due to roadway constraints Staff suggests a phased approach to the implementation of the preferred calming measures as follows: Phase 1 - Implement striped "Bulb-outs" at Choate Street, Channel Street and Entry Point to the subdivision from Morgan Hill. Modify existing bike lane striping as necessary to accommodate "Bulb-outs". Phase 2 - Remove existing striping and implement striped chicanes along Nighthawk Pass and maintain "Bulb-out" at intersections. This second phase can be implemented if a significant reduction in vehicular speeds is not achieved with Phase 1. Also, implementation of this phase may require a pavement slurry seal to cover removed striping and reduce conflicts between old and new striping. If the chicanes and "Bulb-outs' prove to be effective a raised asphalt berm could be implemented to reinforce the traffic calming measures. Phase 3 — Implement traffic circles if Phase 1 and Phase 2 fail to achieve the results desired by the residents. Under all phases Staff will continue to monitor vehicular speeds and volumes along Nighthawk Pass. Additionally, Staff will monitor conditions at the intersections of Nighthawk Pass at Choate Street and Channel Street to determine if multi-way stop signs are justified as development occurs in Morgan Hill. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with implementing Phase 1. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division's operating budget. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" —Traffic Calming Concepts 3 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP In ne bf 4 i'i"IfECI A LOCATION MAP ivy Legend G city Streets n -sy p varcels WINSTON.WY 5l Aria1 a2012 ♦' t MERSON.WY yF t- v J T J \t Y O L O 06- 0 ( VyQ�P a` � o • (O� r . � Y EY t �Fq� x .r o NSA .�ppay e A COSry t m, L� UP�t� G �- 'Qoss�, Rus 0 700 1400 2100 ft. Scab:1:7,306 Map center: 6312627,2119669 4Y This map rs a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only Data layers It t appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current or otherwise renable THIS MAP IS NOT 70 BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. EXHIBIT "B" TRAFFIC CALMING ALTERNATIVES 5 Striping Widths \ = ttl Tnvq IJre ��. ta' McOan �1 . ltl TrvM Lare skin Lane y �l r Y ` w Wes!of Choate Street r?4-' a► 5' Me Lane �� Y��°� 1tl Trawlure T.,w Lore S' skin Lane T Palling two East of Choate Street IN I I MO , la { t � __ _ •.-�. �� III= t'� � a Existing Striping Exhibit A �WILLDAN nwa crm�re oN°a x CI N.7) Enginring . .T�1 Striping Widths �� (HOIb 9cNl - 51 Bike Lane t f 10 Twel Lane �i t. ta' McEicn 10' TmvN Lane 9 5' Bike Len. e - 1 West of Choate Street k 1 y , ]' P.Mmt,Lane 5' &ke Lane 1o' Trev.l Lane . r ' 10' Thivel Lane ; see Lane � Parking Laro J - r East of Choate Street Ir 1 L *"1 0 am ' tTl t __ — f. b � r� qIf r L , N F 1 � n LEGEND Possible Action. Install bulbouts at intersections east of Butterfield Stage Road to enhance the existing edgeline striping. J •aw�� Concept Plan 1 Existing Striping with Bulbouts Exhibit B �WILLDAN Engineering I nrrt cymi�a nc,n or r.—"w Striping Widths 1 _ 5 akm Lane TNVM Lane TravO Lane ,j, a -^'_ &M Lane ■ a. • � T .Ir //�� West of Choate Street - -.ate 'lL $ • 1 v, = T PaMN lane .� 5' sake Lane to Travel Lane t, . Ta Travel Lane de 5' &ke Lane got 1 i _ T PaMN Lane r .Z.. East of Choate Street III TU t �I LEGEND Possible Action Replace median west of Choate St with a chicane&install bulbouts at intersections --- __ ---- =Cmcane east of Choate St,including the east side of Choate St. Concept Plan 2 -Bwwe, Existing Striping with Chicane and Bulbouts Exhibit C 'In.—i,pa.. W I LLDAN Toem cwm,,omoe.(#+034,71 Engineering ary o,Tee .w 1 1 .f Striping Widths j Bike Lane t a' ltl 9 Travel Lane Y�r f ltl Trawl Lane 1 5 Bike Lane • • West of Choate Street F ik e' Parking Lane Bike Lane 10" Travel Lane `Tnlrol Lane Penurq Lane !r ( East of Choate Street r — �- ax Y man= 11110 r �f f: !ll t t a r _ I � f � LEGEND Possible Action: Replace median west of Choate St with a chicane&install chicane on the south side of Nighthawk Pass east of Choate St. =cmone a Would require the removal of parking on the south side of Nighthawk Pass east of Choate St. Concept Plan 3 b.The bike lane would be next to the wrb. Chicanes Full Length Exhibit D *rWILLDAN Engineering I TrMC C.lmirq eciry a�l.mcxup Striping Widths Medan '1 _� la"ab YYl i � Bake Laro 9 1 " " Trawl Lane to Travel Lane IO r r ,{{ ++ w t i.. ' Blka Lane B west of Choate suer oft B• ParWrp Lane s' Bake Lane � , x 10 Vaval Lane e ti 10 TravN Lane ' r 1.�- r j B Bake Lane --k !y East of Choate Street mi �UU, k ' e LEGEND Possible Action. Add T-wide buffers to the bike lanes. a.Would require narrowing of the exisBrg painted median west of Choate St. =Bee Lane Burton b.Would require the removal of parking on the south side of Nighthawk Pass east of Choate St Concept Plan 4 =aueedMMaa Bike Lane Buffers Exhibit E .calmbq 0 g n+oNl Engineering cer w 1-1r1 Striping Widths ` I C 5' Bike Lane t _ 1 19 Trawl Lane ��- ' � 1/' Median T..1 Lane f • 5' Bike Late ilk;•'- \ �� ,r /� West of Choate Street r, r . •F'Q Parbrq Len. 'j 5' Bike Lane �`r \ pM'r ,• 10' ttaeel Lana r . A • e a a 10' Trawl Lane 5' Bike Lena } ➢' Perking Lane a tar. East of Choate Street ki ! \ LEGEND Possible Action: Install a traffic circle at the intersection of Choate St a.Would require a modlflwtlon of the median strping west of Choate St. =Traac craw •r•a sign b.Would require bike lanes to be dropped In advance of the Intersection both east and west of Choate St. Concept Plan 5 c.May require some parking removal near the Intersection on all a legs. Traffic Circle Exhibit F Ngrnaxk a-. �WILLDAN I .n ca wgwdr.a..N71 ErpinaI cro a T.m.[.. ITEM NO. 3 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update AGENDA REPORT M*"%rtt 1i TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 1989 FROM: Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 25, 2015 SUBJECT: Item 3 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". BACKGROUND: The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires local authorities to review, reaffirm or adjust speed limits within their jurisdiction every seven (7) years on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey. The CVC also mandates that new speed limits be established on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The E&T survey provides the mechanism for the legal enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or any other electronic speed-measuring device. As defined in the California Vehicle Code, an engineering and traffic survey is"a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities." The survey shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident statistics, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. These characteristics are all considered when determining a reasonable and prudent posted speed limit. It should be noted that establishing a speed limit, which is not consistent with the 85'h percentile speed, constitutes a "speed trap" and is not enforceable by the use of radar or any other electronic speed- measuring device. Willdan Engineering conducted an E&T Survey on six (6) arterials, which included forty-three (43) segments. The survey indicates that the majority of existing speed limits do not require a change, and the recommended speed limits are consistent with the existing posted speed limits. There are however, seven (7) segments where an increase in the posted speed limit is being recommended. The segments are as follows: • Butterfield Stage Rd. — La Serena Way to Rancho California Rd. 50 MPH to 55 MPH • Butterfield Stage Rd. — Rancho California Rd. to Rancho Vista Rd. 50 MPH to 55 MPH • Butterfield Stage Rd. — Rancho Vista Rd. to Pauba Rd. 50 MPH to 55 MPH • Butterfield Stage Rd. — Pauba Rd. to De Portola Rd. 50 MPH to 55 MPH • Pechanga Parkway — Wolf Valley Rd. to Casino Dr. South 40 MPH to 45 MPH • Pechanga Parkway — Casino Dr. South to South City Limits 40 MPH to 45 MPH • Winchester Rd. — Roripaugh Rd. to Nicolas Rd. 45 MPH to 50 MPH 1 A decrease to the posted speed limit is recommended on the following segment: • Winchester Rd. — Margarita Rd. to Roripaugh Rd. 45 MPH to 40 MPH Additionally, the establishment of a posted speed limit is recommended at the following location: • Avenida Barca — Margarita Rd. to Del Rey Rd. 35 MPH The recommended posted speed limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the Caltrans MUTCD for establishing prudent posted speed limits that are consistent with roadway conditions, prevailing speeds, and more importantly, enforceable. Staff recommends the Commission approve a recommendation that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for installation of signs and pavement legends in the Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division's Operating Budget. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" —Table 2 —Summary of Recommendations 2 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP 3 rxccrn,w TEMECULA LOCATION MAP - ..rte...,...._.: 215 C' 215 Legend O city ^, Highways Streets2 79 t5 0 1.76 3.5 5.26 mi. Scale: 1:98,758 Map center:6293642,2124772 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping silo and is for general reference only Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate current,or omerwise rebable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION EXHIBIT "B" CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1 AVENIDA BARCA MARGARITA RD. DEL REY RD. NP 35 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 2 BUTTERFIELD MURRIETA HOT CALLE CHAPOS 55 57 55 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. SPRINGS RD. 3 BUTTERFIELD CALLE CHAPOS LA SERENA WAY 55 58 55 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 STAGE RD. 4 BUTTERFIELD LA SERENA WAY RANCHO 50 56 55 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. CALIFORNIA RD 5 BUTTERFIELD RANCHO RANCHO VISTA RD. 50 57 55" CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. CALIFORNIA RD. 6 BUTTERFIELD RANCHO VIST RD. PAUBA RD 50 57 55 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. 7 BUTTERFIELD PAUBA RD. DE PORTOLA RD. 50155 57 55 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. 8 BUTTERFIELD DE PORTOLA RD. TEMECULA PKWY 50 50 50 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED STAGE RD. 9 BUTTERFIELD TEMECULA PKWY. WELTON WAY 45 49 45" CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 STAGE RD. 10 BUTTERFIELD WELTON WAY NIGHTHAWK PASS 45 50 45" ` STAGE RD. 11 JEFFERSON AVE. NORTH CITY LIMIT WINCHESTER RD. 40 35 40 ' 12 JEFFERSON AVE. WINCHESTER RD. OVERLAND DR. 40 38 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 13 JEFFERSON AVE. OVERLAND DR. VIA MONTEZUMA 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 14 JEFFERSON AVE. VIA MONTEZUMA DEL RIO RD. 40 42 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED ' See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments = 25 mph when children are present 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey 8 City of Temecula I f I 15 JEFFERSON AVE. DEL RIO RD. RANCHO 40 44 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 CALIFORNIA RD. 16 PECHANGA PKWY. TEMECULA PKWY RAINBOW CANYON 40 40 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 17 PECHANGA PKWY RAINBOW CANYON MURFIELD DR. 45 51 45 18 PECHANGA PKWY. MURFIELD DR. LOMA LINDA RD 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 19 PECHANGA PKWY. LOMA LINDA RD. WOLF VALLEY RD. 45 50 45 ' 20 PECHANGA PKWY. WOLF VALLEY RD. CASINO DR. SOUTH 40 45 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 21 PECHANGA PKWY. CASINO DR. SOUTH SOUTH CITY LIMITS 40 46 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 22 WINCHESTER RD. DENDY PKWY FULLER RD 50 46 50 23 WINCHESTER RD. FULLER RD. DIAZ RD 50 52 50 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 24 WINCHESTER RD. DIAZ RD ENTERPRISE CIRCLE 40 40 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 25 WINCHESTER RD. ENTERPRISE CIRCLE JEFFERSON AVE. 40 43 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 26 WINCHESTER RD. JEFFRESON AVE. YNEZ RD. 40 33 40 27 WINCHESTER RD. YNEZ RD. PROMENADE MALL 40 39 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 28 WINCHESTER RD PROMENADE MALL PROMENADE MALL 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED WEST EAST 29 WINCHESTER RD. PROMENADE MALL MARGARITA RD. 40 42 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED EAST See"Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments = 25 mph when children are present 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey 9 City of Temecula 30 WINCHESTER RD. MARGARITA RD. RORIPAUGH RD. 45 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 31 WINCHESTER RD. RORIPAUGH RD, NICOLAS RD 45 48 50" CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 32 WINCHESTER RD. NICOLAS RD. EAST CITY LIMIT 55 55 55 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 33 YNEZ RD NORTH CITY LIMITS DATE ST 45 40 45 34 YNEZ RD. DATE ST EQUITY DR 45 45 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 35 YNEZ RD. EQUITY DR WINCHESTER RD 45 46 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 36 YNEZ RD WINCHESTER RD. OVERLAND DR. 45 41 45 ` 37 YNEZ RD OVERLAND DR. SOLANA WAY 45 43 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 38 YNEZ RD. SOLANA WAY CALIFORNIA RD 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 39 YNEZ RD. RANCHO RANCHO VISTA RD. 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 CALIFORNIA RD. 40 YNEZ RD. RANCHO VISTA RD. PAUBA RD. 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 41 YNEZ RD. PAUBA RD SANTIAGO RD. 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 42 YNEZ RD. SANTIAGO RD. LA PAZ ST 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 43 YNEZ RD. LA PAZ ST. JEDEDIAH SMITH RD. 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 See"Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments '= 25 mph when children are present 2016 Engineering and Traffic Survey 10 City of Temecula TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works �y/w�/� FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent— PW Streets` DATE: February 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for January, 2016 Cc: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Mayra De La Torre. Senior Engineer— Land Development Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic I Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of January, 2016 i The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent !r. DATE: February 1, 2016 3 r1x9 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report-January, 2016 The following activities were performed by the Street Maintenance Division personnel for the month of January,2016: 1. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 21 B. Total signs installed 8 C. Total signs repaired 16 D. Banners Replaced 165 II. TREES A. 'total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 93 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A.C.repairs 1,408 B. Total Tons 43.5 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 193 B. Down Spouts 0 C. Under sidewalks 5 D. Bowls 9 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 11 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 55 B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A.8 New and Repainted Legends B.0 L.F.of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D.0 Thermal Plastic E. 10 RPMs Installed Also,City Maintenance staff responded to 47 service order requests ranging fi-om weed abatement,tree trimming,sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal,and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 29 service order requests for the month of December,8015. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 91 hours ol'overtime which includes standby time,special evenLs and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 8016 was $33.930.50 compared W$54.852.00 for the month of December,8015. Account No.5402 $ 33,930.50 Account No.5401 $ Account No.9995402 $ Electronic Copies: Tom Garcia,City f ngineer - Director of Public Works Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - Capital lmprovemenL% Mayra De LaTorre, Senior Engineer - Land Development Jerry Gormalez,Associate Engineer - Traffic Division DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Dale Submiaed:02MIQ016 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT Suomgled By:Thomas Garda STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION Prepared By Rodney Tidwell FISCAL YEAR 2016-2016 3R000ARTER 8an•15 Fo Is Mar-15 FISCAL YEAR TO DATE WORK WORK i WORK 1 1 WORK TOTAL COST SCOPE OF WORK Unit Cost COMPLETED I COST COMPLETED COST COMPLETED i COST i COMPLETED I C05T FISCAL YEAR ASPHALT CONCRETE: I j Square Footage: $2.97 1,406 $ 4,161.76 0 !f 0 $ - I 63128 j S 43,474.86 S 78,553.53 Tons: 435 0 0 I 1 318.5 Parking Lot Sony Seal Square Footage: Gahms' I 1 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE: 1 Squaw Footage'. $297 0 'S 0 $ 0 $ - I 0 PCC yams: 0 0 0 0 STRIPING&PAVEMENT MARKINGS: 1 --- Red curb 6 Striping(gnearfee0: $0.07 0 f - 0 j - 0 f - I 1,817 j 127.19 3 5.01320 New 6 Repainted Legends(each): 38.00 8 $ 64.00 0 0 f - I 525 f 4,200.00 S 15.565.00 Bull Noses(each): si 0 $ 0 j S 0 3 - j 0 j - 3 42.64 Raised Pavement Markers-RPM'S(each): 10 0 0 1 42 TMnnO Plastic Legends(each): 0 0 I 0 I 0 SIGNS 6 BANNERS No.of 5gns REPLACED: $26.39 21 $ 554.19 0 $ - 0 f - 1 564 $ 14,803.96 $ 16,731.26 Material(cost per sign): $50.00 $ 1,05000 $ - p$ - f 20]00.00 $ 31)00.00 No of Signs INSTALLED: 325.39 B $ 211.12 0 '�.It - 0 ! $ j 105 !$ 2,770.95 $ 9.526.79 Material(cost per sign): $50.00 !$ 400.00 $ - $ - ; I!$ 5,250.00 $ 18.050.00 No of Signs REPAIRED: $25.38 16 f 422.24 U !$ - 0 $ - I 344 $ 9,078.16 $ 12,11301 Materiel(cost Per sign): $50.00 $ 800.00 j S - :$ I $ 17,200.00 $ 22,950.00 No of BANNERS imYalled: $28.39 165 $ 4.354.35 0 j S - 0 $ - 418 j$ 11,031.02 $ 22,748.18 Christmas Wreaths installed: 1126.39 0 I I 0 i$ $ 544A8 GRAFFITI REMOVAL No 01 Locations: 0 f 0 I 444 3347 Square Footage: I 0 0 13,579 31884 DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED Catch Basins: $26.39 193 I$ 5,093.27 0 f - 0 $ - I 566 $ 14,936.74 $ 98,972.38 Down Drains: 52619 0 $ - 0 3 - 0 S 40 $ 1,268.72 $ 2,685.39 Ureter sNewaA Drains $26.39 5 I$ 13115 0 $ 0 f 1 437 $ 11,532,43 S 12.376.91 Detention Basins: $26.39 9 It 237.51 0 0 $ 1 35 !$ 923.65 S 3,06124 Bridge Deck Drains: $26.39 0 i S - 0 $ - 0 3 - 0 f - TREES TRIMMED 1 No of Trees Trimmed $26.39 93 I$ 2,464.27 0 3 - 0 !j - 1 355 $ 8,368,46 3 19.534.16 i 1 R.O.W.WEED ABATEMENT Area Atwood!(square feat): $0.034 0 !$ - 0 $ - 0 S - j 5,395 $ 163,43 3 535.50 i I The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests for a variety of dollar lessons,the total number of Service Order Requests,some of vihIch Income work reported above is reported monthly. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS I No of SOR's: 47 ! 0 0 301 855 i Personnel assigned M Me Street Marntsnance Division am one ll and respond!W after hours emergencies or support City sponsored special meta 1 I j Overtime Hours: $39.59 91 0 'S 3,502.68 0 i S 0 j S 581 f 22,190.20 337.382.88 i TOTALA 1 2,117.5 1 IS 23,557.36 0 1 It - 0 1$ - I $5,985 i 195,817.78 11352.5113.74 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The litllowing contractors have performed the following projects for the month o1 january, 2016 DATE DESCRIFTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT 7nRFff1CHANNEIARIMT E OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborists, Inc. Date: 12-31-15 Annual ROW tree trimming Citywide # It 1859 TOTAL COST $1,:372.00 Date: 1-15-16 Annual ROW tree trimming Citywide # 112307 TOTAL COST $13,720.00 CONTRACTOR: Rene's Commercial Management Date: 1-7-16 Annual Application of Pre& Post Emergent #01-16 Citywide Herbicides TOTAL COST $18,838.50 Date: # TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR Date: p TOTAI.COST Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $33,930.50 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #995402 It%MAIN IA INUIUACTKPT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted. February 1,2016 CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED Submitted By Thomas Garcia FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 Prepared By. Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Year to Data ASPHALT CONCRETE Square Footage ....._.....o._..._..- — -..__._. —__._ _—._._ 0 ___--.. 0 0 Cost f - $ - f - f f - f - f - ANNUALSPRAYS Annual Spraying of Pro/Post Herbicides Cost S 18,838.50 f - S - S f - f - f 58,838_.50 ...............—' ---- ----'--- DRAINAGE FACILITIES Channels(each) 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- _. _ 0 Cost S - STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Striping(linear feet) _ 0 _ -_ 0 0 0 —__0 0 0 Sandblasting(linear feet) _ 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 Legends(each) 0 0 0 0 __•_•-_0 - 0 0 Cwt $ TREES Trees Trimmed -____—•0 0 0 0 _---_— 0— 0 0 Trees Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tree Planting 0 Cost S 15,082.00 f - f t S S f 55,97!.00 WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Public Lands Abated(Square Feet) -_ 0 0 0 — 0_ 0 __. 0 Cwt S - $ f — Y S S f - f 5,000.00 MISC.MAINT ACTfVITES Misc cleanup(mowing/debris/etc.) Cwt f $ S f f S f 51000.00 Install 10 LF of 18"CMP Cwt f S f f f S f Fix Guardrail Cwt f S S S f f f Repair Roadway Cost S S f 31,000.00 Sandbags Cost $ f f S f� ^_._. $ --_ f ---. Mac concrete work Cost $ S - f•_,-�� S f i - f - Channelcleanout Cost $ f S $ S $ f 8760.00 TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS f 33 030.50 f S S f S f 217,481A9 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 Month Number Square 4,000 -- 120 of Calls Footage Jul 98 1,798 3,500 - - lOG Aug 104 3,776 3,000 - - Sep 112 1,796 80 Oct 57 2,523 2,500 -- V Nov 32 735 n 2,000 - - - - 60 `o Dec 41 2,951 ° Z Jan 55 1,086 1,500 --- 40 Feb 1,000 Mar 20 Soo Apr May 0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 499 14,665 s Square ■Number Footage of Calls POLICE CHIEF ' S REPORT COUNTY SOUTHWEST STATION ANALYSIS To Southwest Station Admin From: Marianna Kuhn, Crime analyst Date February 1 , 2016 Re Part 1 crimes for the City of Temecula for January 1 — 31, 2016 Total Part 1 calls for service: 293. That's a 6% decrease from the previous month (312). 4, eo u _ � Aggravated Assault Burglary Larcenty Theft Robbery Vehicle Theft ■Total 31 36 _ 184 _ _ } 6 36 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category. Data was obtained using Data warehouse. If you need any additional assistance in regards to this request, please do not hesitate to ask. CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC STATISTICS JANUARY 2016 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 907 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 448 Parking Citations 208 Total Citations 1563 Citation Breakdown S.L.A.P. 44 N.E.T. Citations 137 School Zones 47 Seatbelt Citations 40 Community Presentations 0 Traffic Collisions Non-Injury 28 Hit and Run 10 Injury 27 Fatal 1 Total 66 Pedestrian Related Collisions 1 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D.U.I. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 20 Cell Phone Cites Total cell phone cites 71 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/ "Click it or Ticket" Operations Prepared Feb 4, 2016 Deputy Joe Narciso Commission Members February 4, 2016 City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members: Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of January, 2016. These activities include the following: • Citation statistics(attachment) • Part 1 Crimes (attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call-outs: Jan 1: Found male child 42300 Morag Rd —2 CAP members, 1 CAP unit Jan. 8: DUI Collision/Rancho Cal &Ynez/2 people trapped —4 CAP Members, 3 CAP units r Jan 12: Traffic Collision: Margarita Rd. & Santiago Rd. —5 CAP members, 3 CAP units Jan 14: Traffic Collision: Nicolas Rd & Rorigaugh Rd —3 CAP members, 3 CAP units Jan 19: Fatal Motorcycle Collision: Meadows Pky& Spyglass Hill —5 CAP members, 3 CAP units • Community Action Patrol activity/ patrol hours: 797 hours for January, 2016. Year-to-date total: 797 hours. *There were 29 CAP patrols with 61 members participating. • Training: Review of new CAP patrol log forms, at CAP Meeting • Special Events: r Jan 27: Patrol vehicle speedometer calibrations/Nine members helped • Radar Trailer Deployments: 01/06/16-01/11/16 Jefferson Ave X Buecking Dr 26, 638 vehicles 01/11/16-01/20/16 Rancho California Rd X Via Las Colinas Rd. 48,070 vehicles 01/21/16-02/01/16 Rancho California Rd X Moraga Road 57,323 vehicles 01/25/16-02/01116 La Serena X Promenade Chardonnay Hills 32,045 vehicles If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department, Traffic Division—(951) 704-7097. Sincerely, Deputy Joe Narciso Temecula Police Department Traffic Division FIRE CHIEF ' S REPORT Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics I r�or[cr g ml John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 2;12,2')1b Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIs Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion, Station.Jurisdiction Incidents Reponed for Date between 1/1/2016 and 1/31/2016 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 9noderrts are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for Date between 1/1/2016 and 1/31/2016 and Temecula City ■FY PWm 75 108% •Ha2 MN 6 0 9% ■Meorel 463 668°, ■Ot11e1 Rre 13 1 9% a PUNIC Serve burst 33 4 8% Res Fire 3 04% •Rnymg Alarm 1 0.1% ■SMMby 12 17% 0 7mffic CAUon 83 120% ■Veh,tl Fm 1 01% N wldaM F. 3 04% ToMI 693 100.0% False Alarm 75 Haz Mat 6 Medical 463 Other Fire 13 Public Service Assist 33 Res Fire 3 Ringing Alarm t Standby 112 Traffic Collision 83 Vehicle Fire i Wildland Fire 3 Incident Total: 693 Average Enroute to Onscene Time- Enroute Time=When a unit has been acknowledged as responding.Onscene Time=When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene For any other statistic outside Enrout to Onscene please ntact the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 468 157 19 3 4.3 72.3% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM,HZMMC,OAC,OAF,OAK OAMAD,OAMAI,OAMTE,OAMVA,OAP,OAR,OAV,OUT,OOU, LEB,LEO,LEI,BRNPMT,OES,PAA,PAD,PAF,PAO,PAP,HFS,HFSAM,HFSCA,HSBT,HSBTC,HSBTS,HSBTV,HSE,HSG Last Updated 2/12/2016 3 Page 2 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction False Haz Mat Medical Other Public Res Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan Alarm Fire Service Fire Aland collisio Fire d Fire 12 Temecula 19 1 94 2 4 0 0 2 29 0 0 emecula Station Total 19 1 94 2 4 0 0 2 on 73 Rancho Temecula 29 0 144 5 12 1 1 0 23 1 0 is station Total 29 _ :...id"-m.. 5 12 Uon 83 French Temecula 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - station Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 ea Temecula 17 3 125 0 13 2 0 6 19 0 1 arkview Station Trial 1 0?,,.. J,3,. 2 0 92 Wolf Temecula 10 2 97 6 4 y0, 0 4 12 0 2 SWW Ta9tl Last Updated 2/12/2016 3 Page 3 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Jurisdiction False Maz Mat Medical Other Public Res Fire Ringing standby Traffic Vehicle Wildland Alarm Fire Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire mecula 7la 5 6 463 13 33 3 1 12 83 1 3 e Last Updated 2/12/2016 3 Page 4 of 6 'Incidents are shovm based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 3 CHUCK WAS False Alarm 75 Haz Mat 6 Medical 463 Other Fire 13 Public Service Assist 33 Res Fire 3 Ringing Alarm 1 Standby 12 Traffic Collision 83 Vehicle Fire 1 Wildland Fire 1 3 Last Updated 2/12/2016 3'. Page e 5 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in INCIDENT DATE >= '2016-1-1' and INCIDENT DATE <='2016-1-31' and CITYNAME _ 'Ternecula' IF \ b J _ ,J _ V \ `D .•JV J JV O IV J OJ 1 � Olt a YJ 0 a o V a `J Y v w 10— T ° - ' O SZrtm:2 VVQ RMonK J J . V J � O � �' J ' � J V Y � J J r J J V J J V 0 V. ...i V .• J t] J U O �•� '�r PECHANGAC/SINO AND RV Legend • Fre u ourre Mss O I RuE-s cE County 46 -rE Statior• J II�Z Man V rWli�riu A.a'�.ia _� RESQ'vBIIT5 CYSI�05 Rn.crculpfnun Sy F,,. raG V Mlmiral Last Updated 7/1212016 3 Page 6 of 6 Incidents are shovm based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. 2016 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2016 C lass Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR AED 20 20 FIRST AID 7 7 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 HCP 0 0 STAFF HCP 3 3 CERT 0 0 TEEN CERT 0 0 Total 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2016 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 0 FALSE ALARM 75 75 HAZ MAT 6 6 MEDICAL AID 463 463 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 0 OTHER FIRE 13 13 OTHER MISC. 0 0 PSA 33 33 RINGING ALARM 1 1 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 3 3 RESCUE 0 0 STANDBY 12 12 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 83 83 VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 1 WILDLAND FIRE 3 3 Total 693 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 693 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2015 vs. 2016 i 690 - 685 680 --- _---_ 675 670 665 D 2015 YTD ! 660 655 0 201 YTD ANA 650 645 .x 1.640 - ' I p�JpQ, OpJPp� �PpLS Pp\� `rP, lJ�� J�, JOJSS ��O�P SOe�P 4�0�p 4`rO�P -10 �p� 1O i MONTH 2015 YLD 2016 YTD JANUARY 660 693 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL TO DATE h60 693 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2015 vs. 2016 r - -- BO 18C 160 160 140 120 i00 60 60 40 0 20 0 ' lP?Jppi pppJppi �Pp`� PQp\` �Pi 1J2� ,Ji P('JS< Q`p��p ��p ��P `��p�P iOQP4p ■2015YT0 02016YT0 i0 MONTH 2015 YTD 2016 YID JANUARY 180 30 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL TO DATE 180 30 Vii.. ire Department Temecula Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: January Reporting Year: 2016 Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92 Stations: PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of Events Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts. for Reporting Month 0 School Event 0 0 0 Adult Education 0 0 0 Fair/Safety Expo 0 0 0 Display 0 0 3 Station Tour 6 96 0 Fire Safety Trailer 0 0 1 Other 2 25 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of Initial Field Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 0 Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 0 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc Include photos if available. Engine 12 was engaged in two residential fires in De Luz; Engine 92 responded to a series of tree fires in the WolfcreeklRedhawk area.