The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042490 CC Agenda&GBND& 'I~]~CUI~ CZ'I~Z CO~I*CZL & ~.~GUT. d~ HBTZNG APRIT' 24v 1990 Reso] ut4 on No, 90-45 O~dtnance No. 90-08 Invocation Flag Salute Pastor T. J. Mercer Rancho Community Church Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz Parks Peace Day, Sunday 20, 1990. A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink e"Request To Speak- form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called speak, please come forward and state your n~me and address. For all other agenda items a ,,Request To Speak"" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a fiv,e (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. All matters. '~isted under Consent Calendar are considered to be routln~ and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless ,.. members of the City Council request specific items to be ~. removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 3/.~.da/0424~0 ] 04/~9/~0 H nutee 1.1 1.2 Approve minutes of March 20, 1990 as mailed. Approve minutes of March 27, 1990 as mailed. 0 0 o RoeolutionAgprovinq Payment of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: P~HOLUTION NO. 90- ARESOLUTION OF THBCITYCOUNCIL OFT HE CITY OF TEMECUL~ ALLONIN~ ~RTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN City Treaeuror*s Report for the Month Ending Mn~ch 31. 1990. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file. Statement of Rovenues andBx~enditures - Buduetand Actu&l for the Month - Wnding March 31. 19900 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file. ApDrov&l of dr&in&go and access easement; across LOtS 23 and 24. Tr&ct 23220; lee&ted &d~acont to Cello K&torine. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution approving the dedication of an easement for drainage and access purposes across a portion of Lots 23 and 24, Tract 23220 but not accepting the easement for maintenance purposes. RESOLUTION NO. 90- ARESOLUTION OPTH~CITY~OUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF ~ALIFORNIA; APPROVINg DEDICATION OF AN EA~EHENT FOR DRAI~BANDAC~H8 PURPOSES ~ROHH ~PORTION OF LOTH 23 AND 24; TRACT 23220. ® o ® Ca,~endar for Pisoa~ Year 1991 Budqet RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Fiscal Year 1991 Budget Calendar. Sgcgnd reading of Ordinanoo ~B~4seion RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Regardina Pawks and Recreation Adopt and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDIIfANCB NO. 90-05 AN ORDZZ~tNCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TBMBCUL~ ~tDDZNG CHAPTER 13.01 TO ~ TEMECUL~ MUNICIPAL CODS RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECUL~ PARF~ AND RBCRF~TION COMMISSION. Booend reading of O~d~na~oo RegardingPubl,4o Safety Commission RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDZH2~CE NO. 90-06 AN ORDXI~NCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~ ABDXNG CHAPTER 11.01 ~ ~ ~CU~ ~CIP~ ~DB ~TZNG ~ ~ EBT~LIB~ OF A ~CU~ P~LIC B~ETY ~BBXON. 9. Second readinq of. Ordinance Reqardinq Traffic Commission RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt and readby title only an ordinance entitled: ORDZHANCB NO. 90-07 AN ORDZI~NCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~ ADDING C~APTBR 12.01 TO. TH~ TEMECUL~ MUNZCZP~LCODBRELATZNGTOTHB EBTABLIBB~ENTOFTHE TEM~CUL~ TRAFFIC COMMISSION. CSD MEETING - (To be held at S~00 PM) Please see separate agenda ***************************************************************** 3/qenda/04~ 3 ~/19/~ COUNCIL BUBINEBB 10. U encyOrd4n- oe Roq~Pdinq the Proh4h4t~on o£ Billhoards RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90- · N URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMBCULAv CALIFORNL~; ADOPTING AN INTERIM ZONING O~.DX~tNCB PBRTAXNXNG TO RBGUL~TXONB FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTIBXNG DXBPLAYB PUIWU~NT TO THE CALIFORNia ~OVBitI~fE~FF CODE BBCTXON 65858(B) AND MAKING FXNDINGB IN BUPPORT THEREOF. 11. Additional TraEf4o Enforcement Contrast RECOMMENDAT[OH: 11.1 Council fund $12,646.40 for 320 hours of CHP Patrol time and 3,200 patrol car miles. 12. Closed Personnel Bession to Consider Appointment o£ City Han&qer pursuant to ~ovornment Codo, BooriSh 54957. RECOMHEHDATXOH: 12.1 Continue this item to a meeting on April 2§, 1990, 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 13. Appointment of Plannino Commissioners RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Continue this item to a meeting on April 26, 1990, 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. CITY M~N~GER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ~DJOINT Next meeting: April 25, 1990, 6:00 p.m., Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next meeting: April 26, 1990, 6:00 p.m., Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next scheduled meeting: May 1, 1990, 7:00 p.m. 'to be held at the Rancho California Water District Community Room, 28061 Diaz Road, Temecula, California. PROCLAMATION A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WHEREAS, In recognition of the desire of all Californians to establish a just and lasting peace, the California State Legislature has resolved and the Governor has proclaimed that the third Sunday in May of this year and each year thereafter shall be Peace day; and WHEREAS, It is crucial to our participatory democracy that every citizen take responsibility for the achievement of peace at an individual, community, national, and global level; and WHEREAS, The theme of "Discovering Our Common Ground: and Differences," and 1990 California Peace Day is A Celebration of Our Similarities WHEREAS, Promoting a secure and healthy future requires that we respect, appreciate, and celebrate our similarities and differences, and that we cooperate in integrating our diverse perspective, and WHEREAS, The Legislature has called for all persons, institutions, and communities of California to set aside some part of that day toward the promotion and recognition of the peaceful resolution of conflict through mutual understanding and good will; and WHEREAS, The Governor has urged all citizens to engage in activities on Peace Day that will bring about the conditions necessary for a true and meaningful peace between all nations; and WHEREAS, The Mayor of Santa Cruz has urged the Mayor of The City of Temecula to join in recognizing Peace Day and "May: Month of Peace"; and WHEREAS, The recent developments in the world make this an especially appropriate time to work towards discovering our common ground; and WHEREAS, In our local and global communities, substantial work remains in our efforts to accomplish peace, security and dignity for all people; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That I, Ronald J. Parks hereby declare that Sunday, May 20, 1990 shall be "Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground" throughout The City of Temecula and May 1990 is hereby declared the "Month of Peace." Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] City of Santa Cruz CITY HALLO009 CENTER STREET, ROOM 10 SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA 950~0 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TELEPHONE (408) 429- 3550 March 29, 1990 Dear Mayor: I am writing to invite you to join with the many cities that will b~'~nizing California "Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground" on Sunday, Ma~990. In 1988, our state legislature adopted a resolution which called for the Governor to annually proclaim the third Sunday in May as Peace Day in recognition of the desire of all Californians to establish a firm and lasting peace in the world. The resolution also encouraged all California communities, cities, and counties to "set aside some part of the day toward the promotion and recognition of the peaceful resolution of conflict through mutual understanding and good will." In 1989, Governor Deukmejian proclaimed California's first Peace Day, emphasizing that "California, whose diverse people represent a nation within a state,-has proven that diversity is...a strength that can be directed to peaceful ends." Last year, localities representing one-third of the population of California proclaimed our first statewide Peace Day. This year, I invite you to proclaim Sunday, May 20, 1990 as Peace Day in your city. The theme for this year's statewide celebration is "Discovering Our Common Ground: A Celebration Of Our Similarities and Differences." Several cities are planning multicultural celebrations, including Los Angeles, Palo Alto, Livermore, San Francisco, and Santa Cruz. Cities without planned celebrations can participate by having you as Mayor proclaim Peace Day in your community. For the past five years, the Peace Day Project in Santa Cruz has produced an inspiring, broad-based multicultural Peace Day festival, as well as activities during "May: Month of Peace." The Project has formed the California Peace Day Committee to promote and coordinate the statewide celebration. For information about the statewide effort and promoting local events, please contact the California Peace Day Project as 180 Seventh Avenue, Suite 107, Santa Cruz, CA 950662, Tel. 408-475-0207. Sincerely, Mardi Wormhoudt Mayor tdn MW7:PDP.ltr .- . PEACE DAY CALIFORNIA PEACE DAY: Discovering Our Common Ground Sunday, May 20, 1990 and May: Month of Peace Suggestions for Community Action by - Peace Day Project - California Peace Day Committee The theme for California Peace Day 1990 and May: The Month of Peace is "Discovering Our Common Ground". The purpose is to bring people together to appreciate, learn about, and celebrate their similarities and differences on in the context of their common desire for a safe and healthy world. Contact your Mayor, City Council and County Board of Supervisors, and urge them to proclaim "Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground." Enclosed is a suggested Peace Day Proclamation for your use or adaptation. Formulate a broadbased steering committee to organize community event for California Peace Day 1990: Discovering Our Common Ground and May: Month of Peace.** Celebrate Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground -- coordinate a multicultural evere, parade, Peace Run, and/or Interfaith Celebration. Promote Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground and May: Month of Peace through local media. Contact local organizations, government agencies, and churches. Encourage them to inform their membership about Peace Day and May: Month of Peace in mailings, newsletters, and at meetings. Offer community workshops to learn conflict resolution and mediation skills. Set up forums, town meetings and mediated dialogues to break through barders that divide the community and resolve issues with solutions that align all concerned parties. Organize displays and exhibits in local galleries, libraries, government buildings, shopping centers. Ring church bells throughout the community. Have an awards banquet to honor individuals and organizations that build relationships and provide for community cooperation in action. Encourage individuals, families, friends, and associates to celebrate Peace Day: Discovering Our Common Ground wherever they are. Contact CPDC for further information at 408/475-0207. Please let us know ASAP how your community is recognizing Peace Day, May 20, 1990. Peace Day Project 180 Seventh Avenue, Suite 107 Santa Cruz, CA 95062, (408) 47.5-0207 dtscovering our common ground... D&Y MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 20, 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS- Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Muhoz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were city Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Peter Molster, Church of Christ. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Lindemens. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCL/~.ATIONS Mayor Parks proclaimed April 28, 1990 as "Health Fair Expo Day" in Temecula. PUBLIC COMMENTS John Affolter, 34121 DePortola Road, requested that the City Council reconsider the matter of the residency requirements for City Commissioners. Councilmember Moore requested that this matter be placed on the next available agenda. Jim Estock 40420 Calle Medusa, presented petitions from the residents of Calle Medusa and adjoining streets requesting a traffic study and survey of this street to recommend a solution. He also suggested that the City utilize the firm of Kunzman and Associates to do this study since they have already looked at the problem. He also strongly recommended that the City not accept the street before a solution has been implemented. Councilmember Mu~oz suggested that this be referred to staff with directions to pay particular attention to the matter of speed enforcement. Hi-utes\]/20\90 - 1 - 04/17/90 City Council Minutes March 20, 1990 Councilmember Lindemans stated that he has looked at the problems on Calle Medusa and feels that the staff needs to look at the design aspects of the street as well. Ronni Crossland, 30632 Hollyberry Lane, spoke regarding the need to be sure a traffic survey is available to the Council prior to the final approval of the Club Valencia Apartment Project on Rancho California Road. CONSENT CRLENDAR Councilmember Muhoz requested the removal of items two (2) and three (3) from the Consent Calendar· It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to agprove items one (1) and four (4) as follows: 1. Minutes 1.1 1.2 1.3 Approved the minutes of February 20, 1990 as mailed. Approved the minutes of February 27, 1990 as mailed. Approved the minutes of March 3, 1990 as mailed. Plot Plan 11505 - Temecula Creek Inn 4.1 Received and filed Plot Plan 11505. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Muhoz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None M i nutes\~/20\90 - 2- 04/17/90 ....... city Council Minutes March 20, 1990 Final Tract Map 19872 F~nal Tract MaD 19872-5 Items two (2) and three (3) were considered concurrently. City Manager Aleshire presented a staff report advising the Council that both Tract Maps comply with all the conditions. John Dierksen, representing the developer as project engineer, outlined the phases of the project and explained that it is being built in six increments. Councilmember Lindemans asked if any Quimby Fees had been paid by this developer. Mr. Dierksen responded that the fees have been paid to the County. Councilmember Lindemans advised that the City is looking at mitigation fees for freeway overpasses and will be requiring developers to pay a per unit assessment in the near future. Dana Beaver, representing the developer, stated that the developer of this project has also been required to pay fees for the Pala Road widening project. Councilmember Muhoz asked if the tracts have dedicated any park or open space land. Ms. Beaver advised that as a result of the Wolf Valley Crack which runs through the site, 26 of the lots can not be built out. She stated that the developer has considered developing this as a passive park area. Councilmember Muhoz asked if the developer would commit this land to open space or park development. Ms. Beaver responded that while she is not authorized to make such a commitment, she feels that if an agency, such as the City, agrees to operate and maintain the area, the developer would probably be agreeable. Councilmember Lindemans asked how many acres are included in the 26 lots. Mr. Dierksen answered that it would total approximately three acres. Mayor Parks directed staff to pursue this matter with the Parks Consultant. Mi nuZe$\3/:~O\90 -5- 04/17/90 City Council Minutes March 20, 1990 It was moved by Councilmember Muhoz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve items two (2) and three- (3). The motion was approved by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Muhoz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINESS e Proposed Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 2743 city Manager Aleshire gave a staff report recommending that the City Council give both Assembly Member Hunter's office and the Rancho California Water District the opportunity to give the Council the benefit of their opinions regarding this bill. Howard Chesher, 29710 Valle Olvera, spoke in favor of amending A.B. 2743 to change the method of electing board members allowing a shorter transition from property owners to all elected board members. He recommended that the transition take place within a four (4) year period of time rather than the 14 year time-span currently spelled out by the provisions of the bill. He stressed that the committee members have no quarrel with the performance of the existing board, only with the proposed method of electing a transition board. John Hennigar, representing the Rancho Water District stated that the District would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the City Council prior to their making any decision on an amendment to the proposed Assembly Bill. He further advised that the change from property owner board mem bers to an elected member board had been proposed voluntarily by the board and it was not legally required. Jack Darby, 31812 Fir Street stated that he felt a more orderly transition is going to be accomplished with the timetable suggested in the present bill. Councilmember Muhoz stated that he feels it is important that the public have the right to select the representatives of all types of public agencies. MS nutes\]/ZO\90 -4- 04/17/90 .... city Council Minutes March 20. 1990 Mayor Parks suggested that the author of the bill and the Directors of the Water District should be given the opportunity to look at the amendment prior to the City Council taking a position on it. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to refer this matter to staff for further study. The motion was carried unanimously. Report of Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Committee City Manager Aleshire presented a staff report recommending an appropriation of $74,680 and adoption of a resolution requesting the Sheriff to provide additional law enforcement services. He also recommended that the Council request the Sheriff commence with the recruitment of 30 Deputies and six (6) Community Service Officers immediately. Finally he recommended that the Council direct the Mayor to write a letter to the CHP requesting that the Highway Patrol continue to provide traffic enforcement service through the remainder of the year. Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, distributed copies of an article which appeared in the San Diego Union. He stated that the public safety issue has not been properly addressed by the City and he quoted from the article about the lack of timely response from the San Diego Sheriff's Department within one of their contract cities. He stated that he feels the same type of situation is likely to happen in Temecula. He urged the Council to hold hearings on the City's setting up its own police department. Councilmember Lindemans questioned the reason for substituting a Sergeant position for a Captain in the recommendation from the committee. Ralph Limon, Chairman of the Law Enforcement Negotiating Committee, in response stated the reason for this change was because this is an interim solution and it was the committee's feeling that it is more important to have law enforcement personnel on the streets immediately and substituting a Sergeant's position would make an additional uniformed officer available. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to adopt the committee's recommendation leaving in the orginally proposedd Captain's position. Minu~:es\3/20\90 -5- 04./17/90 City Council Minutes March 20. 1990 Councilmember Lindemans questioned if the City would benefit more by having both the Captain's position and the suggested position of Sergeant. After receiving an affirmative response from Mr. Limon, he amended the motion to add the position of Sergeant. Councilmember Mu5oz amended his second to the motion. Councilmember Muhoz stated that the Sheriff's Department has stated they can not provide the additional hours of staffing requested with their existing manpower resources. Captain Bill Reynolds, Riverside County Sheriffs Department stated that the committee has really worked hard to get an interim program in place and advised that a Captain can be brought in by April 1, 1990. Councilmember Muhoz asked if a Sergeant and Captain can both be provided in the same time frame. Captain Reynolds responded that it will be very difficult to provide both positions within the time allotted. Councilmember Moore stated that the Sergeant would provide an additional supervisor who could work with the Sheriff's Posse on weekends. The motion as amended to approve the Committee's recommendation with the addition of the originally proposed Captain and the position of Sergeant was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Muhoz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION 90-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES TO THE CITY AND TO COMMENCE RECRUITMENT FOR DEPUTIES. and to adopt a resolution entitled: nut es \3/20\90 - 6 - 04/17/90 city Council Minutes March 20, 1990 RESOLUTION 90-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $100,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BEGINNING APRIL 1, 1990. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mufoz, Parks None None Councilmember Mufoz stated he would like to know what the CHP recommends for staffing for Temecula and how much of the costs might be offset by revenues generated by traffic citations. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to authorize the mayor to sign a letter to the CHP requesting the continuation of traffic enforcement services through 1990 and including the questions posed by Councilmember Muffoz. The motion was carried unanimously. 11. Riverside County Fire Department/Disaster Planning Workshop Fire Department Chief Glen Newman introduced members of his staff who will be assisting in the presentation as follows: Division Chief Jim Wright, who has just been promoted from Battalion Chief for Temecula, Greg Scott, Howard Tornson and Mary Moreland. He then presented a slide program on the cooperative fire protection program. He outlined the cooperative agreements between the California Department of Forestry, County, Cities and the public who pays for the State programs. He outlined that the program provides emergency services such as fire suppression, fleet management, medical aid and rescue operations, hazardous materials response, earthquake preparedness and educational programs for fire prevention. M i nut e$\]/ZO\90 - 7- 0/+/17/90 .... Citv Council Minutes March 20, 1990 Mary Moreland, Emergency Services Coordinator presented the Emergency Services program which she will be coordinating for the City of Temecula. She outlined the Emergency Council which will be set up for the City to address specific disaster plans. Councilmember Lindemans questioned if a member of the Fire Department had been assigned to do business inspections to assure safety compliance. Chief Jim Wright said this has been done since September of 1989. Howard Townsend, representing Ham Radio Network No. 3 asked the role of the city officials in a disaster situation. Chief Newman said the department will be taking action immediately according to their established disaster plans. The would notify city officials to keep them informed. Councilmember Muhoz asked about the recommended staffing levels in Temecula if the city contracts with the County for Fire protection. He also wanted to know what services would be provided under a contract. Chief Newman said the services contracted would provide a response time of under five minutes anywhere in the City. He expects that reduced response times will yield insurance savings to the City and the homeowners. Councilmember Moore questioned the reasons for requiring sprinklers in some commercial/industrial structures and not in others. She stated that in some locations in the City even wooden structures do not have sprinkler systems. Chief Newman said he would like to meet with Councilmember Moore to discuss the specific cases to accurately answer her question. Councilmember Birdsall questioned if the Fire Department enters into a contract with the ambulance company serving the City. Chief Newman responded that the ambulance company is given space at the station in Temecula, but is not under the control or jurisdiction of the Fire Department. Mayor Parks asked what the Fire Department would need from the City Council in the way of response time on this proposal. Chief Newman said they would like a response within three weeks. Mayor Parks suggested that the Council request that the Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Negotiating Committee also consider this proposal. Ron Fortsen, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District, stated that the District has a Disaster Preparedness Plan in place and M i nut es\3/20\90 - 8- 0/,/17/90 --- city Council Minutes March 20, 1990 requested that the City's plan be completed in accordance with the District's plan. In response to a question from Councilmember Muhoz he stated that this is always the policy of other cities to coordinate the plans with the School Districts. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to refer the agreement proposed by the Riverside Fire Department to the Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Committee for their recommendations within the next three weeks. The motion was unanimously carried. Councilmember Birdsall suggested the addition of two members to the committee who have special expertise in fire and disaster preparedness. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mu5oz to authorize the committee to add two additional members at their discretion. The motion was unanimously carried. Resolution of Intent - Mello Roos District The Mayor announced he would consider this matter out of agenda order due to the lateness of the hour. City Manager Aleshire reported that the City Attorney has prepared a draft of the resolution to incorporate the changes suggested by the members of the Council and other interested parties. He recommended the adoption of a Resolution of Intent. City Attorney Scott Field presented a staff report outlining the changes which have been made to the current draft of the resolution before the Council. nutes\3/Z0\90 - 9- 04/17/90 City Council Minutes March 20. 1990 Councilmember Muhoz questioned the timing of the bond sales and if any discussions have been initiated to place the overpasses in the first series of bonds. City Manager Aleshire advised that the engineering for the overpasses will go forth immediately, and the bond issuance will provide for the aggregate amount of any of the series to be issued and sold at the determination of the County. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Muhoz to adopt the Resolution of Intent as amended by the City Attorney's report as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 90-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ASSIST WITH THE FINANCING OF ROAD, TRAFFIC AND PARK FACILITIES OF REGIONAL BENEFIT WITHIN THE CITY BY MAKING CERTAIN SALES TAX REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE ON BONDS OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1Z (YNEZ CORRIDOR) OF HE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE WHICHMAY BE ISSUED TO FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH FACILITIES The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mu5oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 10. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) City Manager Aleshire introduced former city Councilman from the City of Carson, Gil Smith, representing the Southern California Association of Governments. Mr. Smith, Director of Government and Public Affairs for SCAG extended an invitation to the City of Temecula to become a member of the organization and described the advantages of membership. He also described some of the challenges that confront the region and the growth factors which impact the management of local governments. Minutes\3/20\90 - 10- 04/17/90 .... City Council Minutes March 20, 1990 It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to refer this item to staff for a recommendation regarding membership in the Southern California Association of Governments. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to extend the meeting to the hour of 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. General Plan City Manager Aleshire recommended adoption of direction of the Council. presented the staff report and the resolution prepared at the It was mQved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL& REGARDING ADOPTING THE SOUTHWEST AREA COMMUNITY PLAN THE CITY'S PLANNING GUIDELINES UNTIL THE CITY ADOPTS ITS GENERAL PLAN The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mu~oz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 City Consideration of Rancho California Water District CFD No. 88-3 City Manager F. D. Aleshire introduced the staff report explaining the proposal and the reasons for the Rancho California Water District taking the lead in this Community Facilities District. City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report and pointed out that the developers of this property would be required to install these improvements whether or not a CFD existed. He stated that in general Cities do not use their tax exempt financing powers for project like this. He nut e$\~/ZO\90 o 11 - 04/17/90 City Council Minutes March 20, 1990 recommended that the Bond acquisition not include Kaiser and Rancho Vista Road because these are not arterial roads in the truest sense. Phillip Forbes, 1772 Pala Lake Drive, Fallbrook, representing Rancho California Water District spoke in favor of the city's adopting a resolution approving the agreements. Robert Dieudonne, representing Taylor Woodward and Costain Homes (Tayco) presented a landscape plan showing the planned development of open space and park developments within the property. Mayor Parks inquired as to the width of the rights-of-way on Kaiser and Rancho Vista Road. Mr. Dieudonne responded that Kaiser is 88 feet and Rancho Vista is 110 feet. Stan Wollcott, of the firm of Rutan and Tucker, bond counsel for this project requested that the comments of the Council be transmitted to City Attorney Scott Field for incorporation in changes to the resolution prior to the meeting of March 27, 1990. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to extend the meeting to 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Muhoz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to continue this matter for one week. The motion was unanimously carried. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None at this time. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS City Attorney Field requested that the meeting be adjourned to 6:30 PM on March 27 for the purpose of an Executive Session regarding litigation. This Executive Session will be held in the business offices of the Temecula Town Association. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Muhoz reported on his attendance at the hearing in Warner Springs regarding the landfill and advised that this will generate one truck per minute, 10 hours a day, on Highway 79 South. He also said that additional trucks will be needed to haul fill since there is not sufficient fill at the site. nut es\$/ZO\90 - 1 :~ o 04/17/90 City Council Minutes March 20. 1990 Councilmember Moore reported on the Inland Empire Division of the League of California cities meeting. She said the Council needs to appoint a representative and an alternate to the Division. The alternate need not be a Councilmember. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to adjourn at 10:47 PM to an Executive Session to be held at 6:30 PM on March 27, 1990 at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR F. D. ALESHIRE, CITY CLERK nut es\~/ZO\90 - 13- 04/17/90 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 2?, 1990 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:32 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Muhoz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. City Attorney Scott Field advised that the meeting should be adjourned to an Executive Session pursuant to Section 54957.7 of the Brown Act regarding litigation in the matter of Outdoor Media Group vs The City of Temecula. Mayor Parks declared the adjournment to Executive Session at 6:35 PM. The meeting was reconvened with all members present at 7:16 PM. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ron Bolt, of the Peoples Church of the Valley. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Birdsall. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Ann. L. Woodward, of Preschool-Day Care, 40174 Paseo Sereno, Temecula, assisted by several Preschool students, explained purposes of the national celebration of the "Week of the Young Child". Mayor Ron Parks proclaimed April 1-7, 1990 "Week of the Young Child" in Temecula. PUBLIC COMMENTS R. Jane Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, spoke in opposition to the continued use by businesses in the community of the name Rancho California in their advertising. She requested that the City nutes\3\ZT~90 - 1 - 04/18/90 City Council Minutes March 27, 1990 Manager's office be directed to notify these businesses that the proper address is Temecula, California. Michael Primicerio, 29672 Ramsey Court, read a "Notice of Intent to Circulate Recall Petition" and served Councilmembers Peg Moore and Pat Birdsall with these notices. He also presented copies to the City Clerk. Frank Klein, 30180 Santiago Road, anchored balloon advertising being used extensively throughout the City. He stated they are an eyesore and requested the City look into their removal via enforcement of the sign ordinance. Linda Cloghen, 41304 Bravos Court, addressed the Council regarding the recent denial of billboards. She said she favored the action and stated she felt the city should be looking at a very strict sign ordinance to preserve the beauty of the skyline. CONSENT C~LENDAR Councilmember Mufioz requested the removal of item five from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Lindemans asked if the funds to be invested by the City could be placed with a bank rather than a savings and loan. He also questioned the reference in the Statement of Expenditures to Workers' Compensation. Interim Finance Director Mary Jane Henry explained that this is a typo and should read Workers' compensation benefits. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to approve items 1-4 of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Final Tract Map No. 23371-1 City Attorney Scott Field advised the City Council that the recommendation for this item should also contain approval of a maintenance agreement for parkways. Minutes\3\Z?\90 -2- 04/18/90 ..... City Council Minutes March 27, 1990 Jim Allmon, 43954 Gatewood Way, Temecula stated that he wishes to reiterate his concerns about the traffic flow in the area. He stated that he feels a traffic plan, tied to a local area plan, should be adopted before the Council makes decisions on final maps. Councilmember Muhoz requested that the developer present an overview of this tract. Jim Resney representing The Buie Corporation advised the Council that this development will contain a full 18-hole championship golf course. The residents of this community will be seniors of 55 years of age or older. The completed community will contain 470 acres and 2,000 total units with an average density of slightly over four units to the acre. Councilmember Lindemans stated that he would like to see a breakdown of the fee structure for this project. Councilmember Muhoz questioned the land contouring and asked if the basic elements of the existing terrain will be retained. Mr. Reshey responded that most of the grading has been accomplished at this time and the existing contours will remain. Jim Estock, Calle Medusa, stated that the traffic problem on Calle Medusa has not yet been taken care of and that this project will impact traffic further. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to approve final tract map No. 23371-1 and to authorize the mayor to sign the agreement for parkway maintenance. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 10. Rancho California Water District CFD No. 88-3 Mayor Parks reordered the agenda to allow consideration of this matter at an earlier time in deference to the distances the presenters were required to travel to and from the meeting. g J nutes\3\E?%90 -3- 04/18/90 City Council Minutes March 27. 1990 Phillip Forbes, representing the Rancho California Water District advised that he was available to answer any questions the Council might have on this Community Facilities District. Mayor Parks questioned the outcome of the meeting of the Riverside Board of Supervisors on this matter. Bond Counsel Stan Wolcott advised that the Board of Supervisors had acted favorably on the approval of the joint financing agreements. Councilmember Lindemans stated that the City needs a debt advisory committee to advise them on this type of matter. Councilmember Mufioz expressed concerns regarding the effect on the City's bonding capacity, if this is approved. He also requested the developers make sure that full disclosures are made to potential home buyers in this district. Mr. Wolcott, Bond Counsel advised that this project is similar to an improvement loan on private property in that when the property is fully improved with the dwelling units in place the bonding capacity will go up. It was moved by Mayor Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CERTAIN JOINT FINANCING AGREEMENTS BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND COI4~UNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT. and to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the following agreements: (1) JOINT FINANCINGANDACQUISITION AGREEI~ENTAI~ONG COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-3 OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICTv THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDEr THE CITY OF TE~ECULA, THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTAND TAYCO, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP and, (2) JOINT FINANCING, CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION AGREEMENT A~ONG COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 8-$ OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND TAYCO, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP nut es \3\27\90 - 4 - 04/18/90 City Council Minutes March 27. 1990 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore Mufioz, Parks Lindemans None RECESS Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8:23 PM to a scheduled meeting of the Community Services District. The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 PM with all Councilmembers present PUBLIC HEARINGS Conditional Use Permit No. 3076 - Auto Dealership on West Side of Ynez Road, South of Winchester Mayor Parks opened the Public Hearing at 9:30 PM. City Manager Aleshire introduced the staff report by Tim Serlet, Acting City Engineer, who outlined the four conditions placed on this property which are being appealed by this action. Keith Andrews, 26631 Ynez Road, the appellant, stated that he would like to know if he should be required to complete the four conditions being appealed, prior to the Mello Roos District going into effect, will his project be eligible for reimbursement from the Mello Roos funds. City Attorney Field advised that the lane widening on Ynez Road would be reimbursable since it is included in the Mello Roos District. There being no further speakers, the Mayor declared the public hearing closed at 9:43 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to instruct staff to prepare an appropriate resolution removing conditions one through four as spelled out in the letter of February 13, 1990 from Lawrence A. Toerper, Road Division Engineer for the County of Riverside and to continue the Public Hearing until April 3, 1990. nut es\3\Z7X90 - 5- 04/18/90 city Council Minutes March 27, 1990 The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS 7. Rancho California Road Reimbursement Agreement City Manager F. D. Aleshire advised the City Council that Bedford Properties had requested to have this matter continued for two weeks in order to work out a drainage problem which must be resolved before they can continue with the road widening program. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue this matter for a period of two weeks. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to extend the meeting to the hour of 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. 8. Veterans Day Parade Manager of Information Systems Joe Hreha gave a staff report explaining the proposed route and advised that the staff recommends approval in concept of the parade. Michael Marjano, representing the Veteran's Day Parade Association stated that the parade has been held in Lake Elsinore during the past several years and that the parade has outgrown its present route. He urged the Council to give favorable consideration to this patriotic event. Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 So. General Kerny Road, stated that she would like the Council to consider the 4th of July Parade and the Kiwanis Christmas/City Birthday Parade for approval as well. Mayor Parks asked if the Veteran's Day Parade was a money generating parade. Mr. Marjano responded that donations and sponsorships are requested to pay the costs of administering the parade. Mayor Parks explained that the other parades mentioned can not be considered at this meeting since they were not on the agenda. nut es\3\Z7~90 -6- 04/18/90 -- City Council Minutes March 27. 1990 It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to support the Veteran's Day Parade in concept and to direct the staff to prepare an appropriate ordinance or resolution to regulate parades within the City. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to extend the meeting to the hour of 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Resolution &doDtina Traffic Committee Report Recommendations and Providing Matchina Funds City Manager gave a staff report recommending adoption of a resolution approving the recommendations of the advisory committee and providing matching funding. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to approve a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $50,000 FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL ON 1-15 OVER- CROSSINGS. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 11. CDBG Funds - Old Town Temecula City Manager Aleshire gave a staff report stating that the County has turned down this request for block grant funds for this year. He recommended that the Council receive and file the report. William Perry, 28535 Front Street, #108, stated that the request to the City Council is to add this project to the City's request for funds from Supervisor Abraham's budget. M i nut es\3\;~7\90 - 7'- 04/18/90 .... city Council Minutes March 27, 1990 13. William A. Harker, 31130 So. General Kearny Road, said that the Board of the Old Town Museaum has endorsed the concept presented by Mr. Perry. Mr. Harker encouraged the Council to get a copy of the Old Town Temecula Task Force report originally started by the Chamber of Commerce. He requested that the City adopt the restoration of Old Town as a City project. Councilmember Birdsall asked why the City's endorsement is required to go before the County on this kind of request. Mr Perry responded that the affected streets and rights-of-way are City property. It was moved by Councilmember Muhoz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to endorse this project and recommend that the Board of Supervisors fund this project. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilemember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to extend the meeting until the hour of 11:15 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Club Valencia Apartments - Tract No. 23304 City Manager Aleshire presented the staff report and introduced William Coglan representing the developer IDM Development Corporation. Mr. Coglan explained that the project will have a Mediterranean theme, containing two pools, three spas and two laundry facilities and will feature two architectural bridges over Long Canyon Wash within the development. Councilmember Muhoz questioned if this was originally approved as a condominium development. Mr. Coglan stated the project has an approved Condo map and these units could be sold as such, but the intent is to market the units as apartments. Councilmember Moore questioned the security gate exits. She asked if the gates would create a stacking problem on Rancho California Road for entrance into the project at only one location. Councilmember Lindemans asked if the bridges are wide enough for fire trucks. Mr. Coglan said that the bridges have been designed for emergency vehicle access. ~4 j nut es\3\:>?\90 - 8- 04/18/90 City Council Minutes March 27. 1990 Mike Gray, of the Riverside County Fire Department briefed the Council on the design requirements of the bridges and stated that the Fire Department would require the gates to be electronically controlled for Fire Department use as entrance gates in the event of an emergency. Mayor Parks asked if the developer is willing to have a traffic study prepared for this property. Mr. Coglan stated that he was going to his board for approval of the costs for a traffic study. He is not able to commit to this without board approval. James Marple, 29500 Mira Loma Road, representing Citizens for Responsible Water Management spoke in favor of the City looking at the runoff of rainfall and the effects this project will have on the overall retention capabilities of the area. Ronni Crossland, 30632 Hollyberry Lane, spoke in favor of the City Council requiring the developer to provide a traffic study on the impact of this project. The Council took a straw vote to indicate to the developer their feelings on the need for a traffic impact study. The result of the straw vote was unanimously in favor. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Muhoz to extend the meeting to the hour of 11:30 PM. 13. City Newsletter The City Manager presented the staff report recommending the appropriation of $4,000 to prepare and mail a newsletter to all City residents to provide timely information about the first 100 days since incorporation. Councilmember Moore said in light of the events of the evening it is essential to give the public a clear picture of the Council's record. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to authorize the City Manager to prepare a newsletter to be mailed to the City residents on or about April 15, 1990. The motion was unanimously carried. nut es\.~\Z?%90 - 9 - 0~./18/90 City Council Minutes March 27. 1990 CITY MANaGER REPORTS None at this time. CITY ~TTORNEY REPORTS City Attorney Field advised the Council that his report on the Stevens Kangaroo Rat should be available with 30-45 days. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Mufioz requested that the next agenda have a report outlining the funds which may be available as a result of traffic citations issued by the CHP in the city. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn at 11:26 PM to a meeting to be held on April 3, 1990 at the Rancho California Water District Community Room, 28061 Diaz Road, Temecula, California at 7:00 PM. RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR ATTEST: F. D. ALESHIRE, CITY CLERK H i nutes\3\27~90 - 1 O- 04/18/90 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1: That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited as required by law, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts hereinafter set forth. Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] Resos/90-45 04/17/90 2:05pm CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS AGAINST CITY & PAYROLL APRIL 24, 1990 CK # CK DATE VENDOR 1113 4-5-90 1114 4-5-90 1115 4-5-90 CITY CLERK'S ASSOC OF CA LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 1116 4-17-90 CITY CLERK'S ASSOC OF CA 1117 4-24-90 AUERBACH PUBLISHERS 1118 4-24-90 CA WIRE & TELEPHONE, INC 1119 4-24-90 FARALLON COMPUTING, INC DESCRIPTION MBSHP IN CCAC(JUNE GREEK) SEMINAR 4/24 CCAC ADV CONF REGIST HANDBOOK FOR 4/24 MEETING HNDBK OF MIS MGMT INSTALL PHONE LINE AT RANCHO VISTA PARK ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE 1120 4-24-90 FREEMAN'S OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER PAPER 1121 4-24-90 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1122 4-24-90 H Q ADVANTAGE 1123 4-24-90 THOMAS HAFELI 1124 4-24-90 KEVIN HARRINGTON 1125 4-24-90 W. L. HOLLEY 1126 4-24-90 JOHN MCTIGHE & ASSOC 1127 4-24-90 THE PHONE MAN 1128 4-24-90 PHOTO WORKS 1129 4-24-90 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 1130 4-24-90 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1131 4-24-90 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 1132 4-24-90 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1133 4-24-90 DAVID RODRIGUEZ PARALLEL LINE EXTENDER NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH LETTER PRINTER FOR FINANCE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT P & R CONSULTING FEE RETAINER FEE ADDITIONAL PHONE LINES SLIDES ONE YR SUBSCRIPTION SUPPLIES CHECKSIGNER LAW ENFORCE. SERVICES MOVING FURNITURE FROM MOR VALLEY TO CITY HALL LETTERHEAD, ENV., CARDS AMOUNT 70.00 115.00 175.00 75.00 114.44 1,591.97 5,790.00 51.56 131.55 294.68 951.00 57.50 2,925.05 2,000.00 203.00 66.19 81.00 1,406.39 1,065.48 2,980.77 75.00 [134 4-24-90 SIR SPEEDY 652.33 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS AGAINST CITY & PAYROLL APRIL 24, 1990 CK # CK DATE VENDOR 1135 4-24-90 S CALIF EDISON 1136 4-24-90 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOC 1137 4-24-90 KATHLEEN V. TURNER 1138 4-24-90 WINDSOR CONST CO 1139 4-24-90 PATRICIA BIRDSALL 1140 4-24-90 RONALD PARKS 1141 4-24-90 J. SAL MUNOZ 1142 4-24-90 PEG MOORE 1143 4-24-90 KAREL F. LINDEMANS TOTAL PAYMENTS DUE: PAYROLL: 353 4-9-90 354 4-9-90 355 4-9-90 356 4-9-90 357 4-9-90 358 4-9-90 359 4-9-90 360 4-9-90 361 4-9-90 362 4-9-90 363 4-9-90 FRANKLIN ALESHIRE JUNE S. GREEK CYNTHIA C. HARMON ROSE R. PEREA KATHLEEN TURNER TERESA A. MALEY LISA M. CARTER JOSEPH P. HREHA SHARON J. FRANCIS KEVIN HARRINGTON JOANNE KIRCHGASSNER SUB TOTAL PAYROLL DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC(12/27-1/24) CLEANING COM CTR HALL MILESAGE REIMBURSEMENT ADD CARPETING & ELECTRIC MONTH OF APRIL MONTH OF APRIL MONTH OF APRIL MONTH OF APRIL MONTH OF APRIL 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 3/26/90-4/6/90 AMOUNT 119.65 210.00 22.01 5,200.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 $27,924.57 2,493.08 930.92 1,052.57 551.66 715.03 594.60 434.36 1,555.22 543.31 287.15 331.04 9,488.94 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS AGAINST CITY & PAYROLL APRIL 24, 1990 CK # CK DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 364 4-12-90 OVERLAND BANK 365 4-12-90 EDD JK I hereby Dated certify that the FEDERAL TAX DEPOSIT CALIFORNIA INCOME TAX TOTAL PAYROLL: 3,533.08 $446.54 $13,468.56 TOTAL PAYMENTS & PAYROLL: $41,393.13 foregoing is true and correct./ F~ D. Aleshire/Interim city Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: MTG:4/24/90 DEPT: Finance TITLE: City Treasurer's Report for the Month Ending March 31, 1990 DEPT HD y~ CITY ATT CITY MGR -~l,~' ~ RECOI~IENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report for the month ending March 31, 1990 BACKGROUND: A report to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio is required as part of Government Code Section 53646. In addition, a report from the City Treasurer regarding receipts, disbursements and fund balances is required by Government Code Section 41004. The accompanying report for the month ending March 31, 1990 meets both of these Government Code requirements. FISCAL IMPACT None. ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report for the Month Ending March 31, 1990. City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Cash Activity Beginning Balance, March 1, 1990 Cash Receipts - Revenues Cash Disbursements $359,290 324,465 (215,450) Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1990 $468,305 Cash and Investment Portfolio as of March 31, 1990 Institution Yield Maturity Balance Money Market Demand Deposits Petty Cash Certificate of Deposit Certificate of Deposit Certificate of Deposit Local Agency Investmt Fund Overland Bank 6.50% N/A $46,260 Overland Bank 4.75% N/A 20,252 N/A N/A N/A 200 Overland Bank 7.50% 4/21/90 50,625 Overland Bank 7.50% 6/20/90 50,968 Glendale Fed Bank 8.15% 5/29/90 100,000 State Treasurer 8.51% N/A 200,000 Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1990 $468,305 NOTE: The loan from Riverside County was repaid on March 14, 1990. CITY OF TEME CULA AGENDA REPORT AB# MTG: DEPT: Finance TITLE: Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for the Month Ending March 31, 1990 DEPT HD ~ CITY ATT CITY MGR ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Statements of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual for the Month Ending March 31, 1990. DISCUSSION: The attached statements summarize the City's operations for the month of March 1990. The excess of General Fund revenues over expenditures is $327,957 for the four months ending March 31, 1990. Thirty-six percent of General Fund revenues were received as of March 31, 1990. The City received its first estimated sales tax payment in the amount of $168,500. Actual sales tax collected in the City will not be reported to us by the State Board of Equalization until June or July. Twenty percent of budgeted appropriations were expended as of March 31, 1990. Road fund revenues of $37,274 were received during the month ending March 31, 1990. The City has not yet received Measure A or Local Transportation funds but expects to begin receiving such payments during May. No road fund revenues have been expended to date. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Statement of Revenues - Budget and Actual - Special Revenue Funds for the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund for the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual - General Fund by Department for the Month Ending March 31, 1990 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Funds For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Revenues: Road Fund: Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Measure A Local Transportation Investment Interest Total Road Fund Adopted Year Month Budget to Date to Date $ 90,971 $ 35,650 $ 12,197 $ 174,288 67,838 24,746 6,000 6,000 109,136 108,253 1,243 331 $ 488,648 $110,731 $ 37,274 $ Variance % Year Favorable to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget (55,321) 39% (106,450) 39% 100% (109,136) (108,253) 1,243 (377,917) 23% CSD Fund Miscellaneous Investment Interest Annexation Fees Total CSD Fund $ 1,000 8 $ 8 2,400 2,400 $ 3,408 $ 2,408 $ 1,000 8 2,400 $ 3,408 ~tatement of Revenues For City of Temecula and Expenditures - Budget and Actual the Month Ending March 31, 1990 - General Fund Revenues: Sales Tax Motor Vehicle in Lieu Cigarette Tax Real Property Transfer Tax Franchise Fees Transient Occupancy Tax Contributions Investment Interest Miscellaneous Variance % Year Amended Year Month Favorable to Date Budget to Date to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget $ 766,465 $168,500 $ 168,500 $ (597,965) 529,025 348,147 74,970 (180,878) 30,447 11,501 2,514 (18,946) 89,010 11,898 4,772 (77,112) 40,000 (40,000) 126,660 32,680 32,680 (93,980) 25,000 (25,000) 3,449 1,151 3,449 8,522 188 8,522 22% 66% 38% 13% 26% Total Revenues 1,606,607 584,697 284,775 $ (1,021,910) 36% Expenditures: Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits 296,851 77,859 23,750 218,992 67,705 954 66,751 26% 1% Total Personal Services 364,556 78,813 23,750 285,743 22% Operations and Maintenance: Liability and property insurance Telephone Office supplies/services Office/meeting hall rent Equipment rent Consulting Travel and meetings Legal services Utilities Police services 32,500 33 6,000 3 52,500 24 27,600 12 5,000 2 183,800 50 20,000 6 105,000 26 2,400 150,000 ,136 23,873 (636) 102% .101 888 2,899 52% .242 11,336 28,258 46% .065 3,938 15,535 44% .725 1,840 2,275 55% .447 12,915 133,353 27% .843 3,303 13,157 34% ~493 78,507 25% 894 453 1,506 37% 150,000 Total Operations and Mainten. 584,800 159,946 58,546 424,854 27% Office furniture Office equipment Computer hardware Computer software 100,000 3,198 96,802 3% 59,500 3,218 3,218 56,282 5% 60,129 11,lO1 789 49,028 18% 19,800 464 19,336 2% Total Capital Outlay Contingency Total Expenditures Revenues Over Expenditures 239,429 17,981 4,007 221,448 100,000 100,000 1,288,785 256,740 86,303 1,032,045 317,822 $327,957 $ 198,472 8% 20% City of Temecula Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund by Department For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 City Council Personal Services: Salaries Operations and Maintenance: Consulting Travel and meetings Rent Total Operations and Maintenance Amended Year Month Budget to Date to Date $ 10,500 $ 6,000 $ 1,500 $ 13,800 7,258 1,740 20,000 6,843 3,303 1,200 59 39 35,000 14,160 5,082 Variance % Year Favorable to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget 4,500 57% 6,542 53% 13,157 34% 1,141 5% 20,840 40% Total City Council 45,500 $ 20,160 $ 6,582 25,340 44% City Manager Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits Total Personal Services Operations and Maintenance: Office supplies and services Capital Outlay: Office equipment Computer hardware Computer software Total Capital Outlay $ 119,577 $ 53,501 $ 13,997 17,633 622 137,210 54,123 13,997 10,500 10,294 2,888 11,500 510 510 9,705 4,366 299 2,600 232 23,805 5,108 809 $ 66,076 17,011 83,087 206 10,990 5,339 2,368 18,697 45% 4% 39% 98% 4% 45% 9% 21% Total City Manager $ 171,515 $ 69,525 $ 17,694 $ 101,990 41% City of Temecula Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund by Department For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Amended Year Month Budget to Date to Date Variance % Year Favorable to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget City Clerk Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits Total Personal Services Operations and Maintenance: Office supplies and services Total Operations and Maintenance 30,287 $ 12,818 4,077 9,086 332 39,373 13,150 4,077 22,500 9,441 6,531 22,500 9,441 6,531 17,469 42% 8,754 4% 26,223 33% 13,059 42% 13,059 42% Capital Outlay: Office equipment Computer hardware Computer software Total Capital Outlay 1,000 1,099 1,099 16,020 6,735 490 1,100 232 18,120 8,066 1,589 (99) 110% 9,285 42% 868 21% 10,054 45% Total City Clerk $ 79,993 $ 30,657 $ 12,197 $ 49,336 38% City Attorney Legal services $ 105,000 $ 26,493 $ $ 78,507 25% City of Temecula Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund by Department For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Amended Year Month Budget to Date to Date Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) % Year to Date to Budget Finance Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits Total Personal Services Operations and Maintenance: Office supplies and services Consulting Total Operations and Maintenance $ 40,516 12,155 $ 3,068 1,704 52,671 3,068 1,704 6,000 1,757 1,747 20,000 9,928 4,908 26,000 11,685 6,655 37,448 12,155 49,603 4,243 10,072 14,315 8% 6% 29% 50% 45% Capital Outlay: Office equipment Computer hardware Computer software Total Capital Outlay 1,500 9,662 8,100 1,099 1,099 19,262 1,099 1,099 401 9,662 8,100 18,163 73% 6% Total Finance 97,933 $ 15,852 9,458 82,081 16% Personnel Operations and Maintenance: Consulting $ 50,000 $ 4,832 2,438 $ 45,168 10% City of Temecula Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund by Department For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Management Information Systems Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits Total Personal Services Operations and Maintenance: Office supplies and services Capital Outlay: Computer hardware Computer software Total MIS Community Development Personal Services: Salaries and employer taxes Benefits Total Personal Services Operations and Maintenance: Consulting Office supplies and services Total Operations and Maintenance Capital Outlay: Office equipment Computer hardware Computer software Total Capital Outlay Amended Year Month Budget to Date to Date $ 18,626 2,472 2,472 $ 5,588 Variance % Year Favorable to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget 16,154 5,588 24,214 2,472 2,472 21,742 1,500 170 170 1,330 11% 19,194 19,194 6,700 6,700 25,894 25,894 $ 51,608 $ 2,642 $ 2,642 $ $ 77,375 $ $ $ 23,213 100,588 80,000 24,600 12,000 2,580 92,000 27,180 5OO 5,548 1,300 510 510 7,348 510 510 48,966 77,375 23,213 100,588 55,400 9,420 64,820 (10) 5,548 1,300 6,838 102% Total Community Development $ 199,936 $ 27,690 $ 510 $ 172,246 City of Temecula Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual General Fund by Department For the Month Ending March 31, 1990 Amended Year Month Budget to Date to Date Variance % Year Favorable to Date (Unfavorable) to Budget Parks and Recreation Consulting $ 20,000 $ 3,829 $ 3,829 $ 16,171 19% Public Safety Police Services Nondepartmental Operations and Maintenance: Liability and property insurance Telephone Office rent/maintenance Equipment rent Utilities Total Operations and Maintenance $ 150,000 $ $ 32,500 $ 33,136 $ 23,873 $ 6,000 3,101 888 26,400 12,006 3,899 5,000 2,725 1,840 2,400 894 453 72,300 51,862 30,953 $ 150,000 (636) 102% 2,899 52% 14,394 45% 2,275 55% 1,506 37% 20,438 72% Capital Outlay: Office furniture Office equipment Total Capital Outlay 100,000 3,198 45,000 145,000 3,198 96,802 45,000 3% 141,802 2% Total Nondepartmental Contingency 217,300 55,060 30,953 162,240 100,000 100,000 25% Total $1,288,785 $256,740 $ 86,303 $ 1,032,045 20% TO: Frank Aleshire, City Manager~ FROM: ~P~ Tim Serlet, Division Manager, Willdan Associates DATE: April 16, 1990 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE AND ACCESS EASEMENT; ACROSS LOTS 23 AND 24, TRACT 23220; LOCATED ADJACENT TO CALLE KATERINE. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached Resolution 90- approving the dedication of an easement for drainage and access purposes across a portion of Lots 23 and 24, Tract 23220 but not accepting the easement for maintenance purposes. BACKGROUND: Tract Map 23220 recorded on November 27, 1989. The tract is located in the Northeast corner of the City of Temecula. Subsequent to the recordation of the map, during the grading plan check process, the Riverside County Building and Safety Department discovered the necessity for an additional easement for drainage and access across Lots 23 and 24 of the tract. This easement is required due to the installation of a brow ditch across the two lots for drainage purposes. This easement is dedicated to the public, however, the facilities in the easement will be maintained by the homeowner and the easement is not accepted by the city for maintenance purposes. RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEDICATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND ACCESS PURPOSES ACROSS A PORTION OF LOTS 23 AND 24, TRACT 23220 WHEREAS, The subdivider of Tract 23220 has presented for approval of the City Council of the City of Temecula, a dedication of an EASEMENT for Drainage and Access Purposes across a portion of lots 23 and 24; and WHEREAS, Subdivider desires the City Council to approve said easement; Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the easemere as submitted by the subdivider, is hereby approved by said city. SECTION 2. That the easement is not accepted for maimenance by the City of Temecula. SECTION 3. The Mayor shall sign this resolution and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek Deputy City Clerk Approved as to Form: Scott F. Field City Attorney ?w. 7S a~s 2W sK 29 =O,o,,u~ Drainage easement ~"O~ECT,A~E TR #23220 wO, JAW cou~ o~ ~v~ ~o ~ cou~ CON$~ TO RECORDING ~ ~o (Govemm~ ~ ~ 70501 ~ECO~OEO ~ur ~v coos THIS IS TO CERTIFY ~LORIA SCMAE:CER By DECLARATION OF DEDICATION SADDLEWOOD ASSOCIATES, a California general ~artnership, HEREBY IRREVOCABLY DEDICATE(S) IN Drainage and - Access Easement over situated in the City of Temecula. PERPETUITY to the Publ ic a that certain real property Dated: Dated: March 26, 1990 SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND MADE A PART HEREOF r ~- D~ncan L. Mc Ar~.hur, Vice President 'Adele Duffy, Vice/Pr~i~e~t, Assistant (_,/ Sec reta ry FAR;[.lEST SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a California corporation as beneficiary under Deed of Trust recorded December 19, 1989 as Instrument No. 442995 /' /, .. >,"~ ,, . / , c.-.-~ ~ ;';:,~ ce President Assistant Secretary OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR ROAD AND SURVEY LeRoy D. Smoot ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVL"*YOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1090 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 (714) 787-6554 April 3, 1990 City of Temecula Attn: June Creek RE: Drainage Easement Dedication/Tract 23220 Dear June; The attached copy of a Declaration of Dedication for a drainage easement for Tract 23220 as recorded in Book 210, Pages 27 through 30 of Maps, Records of the Recorder, County of Riverside, California has been approved by this Right-of-Way Section. Please place this document on your consent calendar for the next Board meeting. Upon approval of the Board, please send a notice of approval to Judy Watterlond so she may have the document recorded. If you have any further questions, please contact Judy Watterlond at (714) 275-6712. Sincerely, Wil I iam G. Stephensan Senior Land Surveyor WGS:JAW attachment(s) COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER · 4080 LEMON STREET ,, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 EXHIBIY "A" January 17, 1990 P.N. 2-9096 Tract No. 23220 Drainage and Access Easement An easement for drainage and access over and across that portion of Lots 24 and 23, Tract No. 23220, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 210 of Maps, Pages 27 through 30, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said Lot 23 which bears S81°15'51"E 75.00 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; thence continuing S81°15'51"E 15.00 feet along said South line; thence N12°32'09"E 156.36 feet to a point in the North line of said Lot 24; thence N81°14'56"W 15.00 feet along said North line; thence S12°32'09"W 76.36 feet; thence N81°14'56"W 24.89 feet to a point in the Easterly line of that certain easement (50.00 feet wide) granted to the Metropolitan Water District per document recorded June 24,1958 in Book 2290, Pages 580 through 583, Official Records of said County; thence S12°32'09"W 10.00 feet along said Easterly line; thence S81°14'56"E 24.89 feet; thence S12°32'09"W 70.00 feet to the point of beginning. HER:bjp Harf~ E. Rob'~/PLS 3069 EXHIBIT "~" L ~.-. ~ ~ ~~'~ ...~. ... ,, ~ Io ~ ............. j ..I ~ - . . ~ / ~{~:~:'~. l- ,~ ~, , ~ .... ~ /~,~/,,~ ~,~x' ¥ '" -FF{AC-f JX]O. 2234~,~YJ~D, 202/g2~ 304 L;I i 1' UP I !"IVII:.L,;UL./~ AGENDA REPORT AB#: TITLE: DEPT HD MTG:4/24/90 Calendar for FY. 1991 Budget CiTY ATTY DEPT: F~nance CIZY H~R ~ I ' ...I~COMMF-NDATIOH: That the City Council approve the FY 1991 budget calendar. SUBJECT: On or before June 30, 1990, the City Council is required to adopt a budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991.' The following budget preparation calendar is suggested. March 28 Distribute budget packages to department heads April 10 Department heads return completed budget worksheets ~AT?' May 12 Budget workshop with City Council May 22 Public hearing FY 1991 budget June 12 Adopt FY 1991 budget Generally, the budget will be prepared as follows: Revenues will be estimated based on John McTighe's feasibflity study dated September 1989, McTighe's update as of January 1990, and our experience to date. e To date, the only real experience we have is with DMV fees. The State's estimated sales tax payments are based on McTighe's estimates as of January 1990. The actual sales tax collected will not be available from the State Board of Equialization until June or July.. (See my separate memo re: Sales Tax dated 4/4/90.) Expenditures will be estimated based on input from department heads and .negotiations with County officials. Attached for your information, is a "rough cut" at the FY 1991 budget compared to John McTighe's feasibility study from Septemeber 1989. ALTKB~ATIV~S: Revise dates at your request. Preliminary FY 1991 Budget Comparison. FISCAL IMPACT: None CITY OF TEMECULA Preliminary FY1991 Budget Comparison Preliminary Budget Revenues: General Fund Sales tax Property tax (base & increment) Motor vehicle in lieu Cigarette tax Franchise fees Real property transfer tax Transient occupancy tax Building licenses & permits Planning fees Engineering fees Vehicle code fines Fines, forfeitures & penalties Investment interest 2,252,469 1,233,582 1,135,374 91,160 320,154 199,971 253,320 1,453,360 975,000 1,187,500 156,382 33,419 100,000 Total General Fund Revenues 9,391,691 Road Fund Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Measure A Local Transportation Investment interest Total Road Fund Revenues Community development block grant Total Revenues 147,743 269,338 6,000 375,554 496,000 1,294,635 150,000 $ 10,836,326 McTighe 9/89 3,347,924 1,233,582 928,352 91,160 320,154 199,971 457,155 1,453,360 1,174,662 156,382 33,419 281,884 9,678,005 106,783 226,978 6,000 0 0 10,196 349,957 $ 10,027,962 CITY OF Preliminary FY1991 TEMECULA Budget Comparison Preliminary McTighe Budget 9/89 Expenditures: General Government Personal Services: City Council City Manager City Clerk Finance MIS Total salaries & benefits $ 18,000 $ 23,940 232,700 196,840 71,940 135,979 147,600 107,890 73,500 543,740 464,649 Operations & Maintenance: Services & supplies Postage & public notices Travel Contract services City attorney Total Operations & Maintenance Total General Government 70,000 69,985 30,000 20,280 25,000 18,616 20,000 8,320 160,000 70,720 305,000 187,921 848,740 652,570 Planning Salaries & benefits Services & supplies Travel Contract services Total Planning 340,682 50,000 51,102 5,000 2,600 780,000 95,000 835,000 489,384 Building Contract services $ 1,162,688 $ 1,162,688 CITY OF Preliminary FY1991 TEMECULA Budget Comparison Preliminary Budget McTighe 9/89 Public Works Salaries & benefits Services & supplies Travel Contract street maintenance Contract services Street sweeping Total Public Works Public Safety Police Fire Animal control Total Public Safety Nondepartmental Office rent Insurance Social services Total Nondepartmental Capital Outlay: Office furnishings Computer hardware/software/network Office equipment Road improvements CDBG improvements Total Capital Outlay Contingency Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues over Expenditures Fund Balance as of July 1, 1990 88,525 13,279 5,000 2,000,000 950,000 1,000,000 4,056,804 3,000,000 1,000,000 85,000 4,085,000 300,000 80,000 100,000 480,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 1,570,000 150,000 2,420,000 200,000 14,088,232 (3,251,906) 856,470 88,525 13,279 2,392 910,104 1,014,300 3,824,808 1,000,000 204,952 5,029,760 114,004 275,000 389,004 619,170 619,170 154,792 9,511,668 516,294 Revenues (Under) Over Expenditures $ (2,395,436)$ 516,294 ORDINANCE NO. 90-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 13.01 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 13.01 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code as follows: "13.01.010 Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission - Established. There is hereby established a Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission. 13.01.020 Time and place of meeting. The time and place of the meetings of the Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission shall be established by resolution of the Commission. 13.01.030 Duties. The duties of the Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission shall be established by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day April, 1990. ATTEST: RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk 2/Ords/CJO-05 04/19/90 ORDINANCE NO. 90-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 11.01 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUI~ DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 11.01 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code as follows: "11.01.010 Temecula Public Safety Commission - Established. There is hereby established a Temecula Public Safety Commission. 11.01.020 Time and place of meeting. The time and place of the meetings of the Temecula Public Safety Commission shall be established by resolution of the Commission. 11.01.030 Duties. The duties of the Temecula Public Safety Commission shall be established by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. ATTEST: F. D. ALESHIRE, City Clerk RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR 2/0rds/90-06 04/19/90 ORDINANCE NO. 90-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.01 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 12.01 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code as follows: "12.01.010 Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission - Established. There is hereby established a Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission. 12.01.020 Time and place of meeting. The time and place of the meetings of the Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall be established by resolution of the Commission. 12.01.030 Duties. The duties of the Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall be established by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day April, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk 2/0rds/90-07 04/19/90 CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT AB# MTG ~{- Z~-clo DEPT p~.6~ TITLE: Urgency Ordinance Pertaining to Regulations for Outdoor Advertising Displays (Billboards) CITY ATTY CITY MGR ~ Recommendation That the City Council Adopt Urgency Ordinance placing a moratorium on the constructior of Outdoor Advertising Displays (Billboards). Discussion/Background The City Council has expressed a concern about the potential poliferation of bill- board advertising structures throughout the community. Although the Council chose not to officially adopt the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWACP), the plan does designate both Interstate 15 and State Highway 79 as Scenic Highways. SWACP also contains policies to ensure that onsite advertising (pole signs) be kept to the minimum necessary for identification and should blend with the environment. SWACP does not specifically address billboards. A review of Ordinance 348 (Zoning) reveals that billboards are principally permitted in the following zones: C-1/CP; M-SC; M-M, M-IT. As allowed by the Zoning Code, an applicant would only be required to submit a plot plan to construct a billboard in the aforementioned zones. The permitted zones are mapped on the following figure. As can be seen from the figure, billboards are principally in a majority of core of Temecula and along State Highway 15. It is staff's understanding that a number of plot plans requesting billboards are on file with the County awaiting review. Staff has not been able to quantify the exact number. Until the City has an opportunity to articulate its future goals, through the creation of the City's first Zoning Code to implement those goals, it would be in the City's best interest to place a moratorium on billboards throughout the City. Adoption of this Ordinance will prohibit approvals for 45 days. At the end of this period the Council could adopt a regular Ordinance which would extend the moratorium for an additional 10 months and 15 days. Fiscal Impact Not determined. ,/ O~DINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858lb) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. WHEREAS, on December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was established as a duly organized Municipal Corporation of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 57376, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted its Ordinance No. 1, thereby adopting, by reference. for 120 days the Riverside County Code as the Ordinances of the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 3lib of the Riverside County Code, which contains the Land Use Regulations of the County of Riverside, and which Regulations are currently applicable to the establishment of all uses and development applications J including the allowance of signage) within the City of Temecula. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-01, the City readopted Ordinance No. 3~8 of the County of Riverside as the Land Use Regulations for the City of Temecula; WHEREAS. as part of its review of new and potential development within the City of Temecula, the City Council examined the Southwest Area Community Plan JS.W.A.C.P.) portion of Riverside County General Plan as it has pertained to development in the City of Temecula. Such examination revealed that said S.W.A.C.P. may not provide an appropriate development scheme for the City of Temecuia, and consequently, the City Council adopted the S.W.A.C.P. as planning guidelines until the City could adopt its own General Plan. All action on development applications since incorporation, as to required consistency with the adopted General Plan, has taken place pursuant to the terms and provisions of California Government Code Section 65360; WHEREAS, in recognition of the need for effective long range planning criteria, the City Council commenced, within the time limits prescribed for adoption of a General Plan, the study and formulation of a General Plan for the City of Temecula. A material part of said General Plan Study will be the review and development of effective criteria to regulate all forms of signage within the City of Temecula. ORDTEM/ORD/PS -1- Ordinance No. Page Two WHEREAS, Ordinance 3~8 of the Riverside County Code [hereinafter referred to as the "Land Use Code") currently provides for the approval and establishment of "Outdoor Advertising Displays" within the City of Temecuta. The Land Use Code defines an "Outdoor Advertising Disptay'~ as "The advertisin9 structure and signs used for outdoor advertising purposes, not including on-site advertisin9 signs as hereinafter defined"; WHEREAS, in the near future there could be certain applications for such Outdoor Advertising Displays, the approval of which would not conform to the contemplated Cenerat Plan scheme of development in the City of Temecula and would contradict the specific purposes for the adoption of a unified General Plan. Moreover, pending completion of the General Plan, it is foreseeable that further outdoor advertising display proposals will be submitted for property within the City which would contradict the ultimate goals and policies of the proposed General Plan; WHEREAS, this Council is concerned about the maintenance of the visual aesthetic quality of the City of Temecula, and with the creation of an orderly and balanced development scheme within the City of Temecula. Accordingly, to protect the integrity of the ultimate General Plan and to assure the continued development stability of property within the City of Temecula, this Council finds that it is necessary to establish interim zonin9 policies concerning such signage to allow staff the time necessary to investigate and formulate the ultimate plan of development for the City of Temecula as encompassed within the te~ms and provisions of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, all legat prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth above are true and cottact, Section ;~. The City Council further finds as follows: (a) The City of Temecula is presently developing a General Plan for development of the City of Temecula. The ultimate goal of the General Plan is to provide a balanced and unified plan of development within the City of Temecula and will ultimately upgrade ORDTEM/ORD/PS -2- Ordinance No. Page Three the economic, social and cultural welfare of persons and properties within the City of Temecula. A material portion of the Ceneral Plan study will be the formulation and establishment of regulations for signage, including primary signs, in the City of Temecula. There is the potential for certain applications for the establishment of Outdoor Advertising Displays, the approval of which would contradict the ultimate goals and objectives of the Cenerai Plan. Moreover, pending completion of the General Plan it is foreseeable that further such applications will be received which may further contradict such goals and objectives of the General Plan; and, Pending approval of the General Plan, and associated Land Use Code Regulations concerning signage, the approval of any further sign location plans, plot plans, or other discretionary entitlements for Outdoor Advertising Displays, would result in immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare of persons and properties within the City of Temecula. Section 3. The following interim zoning regulations are hereby adopted: Pending the completion and adoption of the General Plan of the City of Temecula together with associated signage regulation for the Land Use Code Code for the City of Temecula, the establishment of Outdoor Advertising Displays is hereby prohibited and no application for sign location plan. plot plan or other applicable discretionary entitlement for a Outdoor Advertising Display shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved; [b) The provisions of subparagraph 3 la), above. shall not apply to any application for: Onsite Advertising Structures and Signs (Ordinance 348, Section 19.5). Jii) Subdivision Signs (Ordinance 3~8, Section 19.6). Other than as expressly provided in this Ordinance, all other applications for signage shall be processed and acted upon pursuant to the normal and customary provisions of the Land Use Ordinance of the City of Temecula. Section u,. This Ordinance is enacted under the authority of California Government Code Section 65858Ib) and shall be of no further force and effect forty-five [t~5) days from the date of adoption of this Ordinance unless the City Council has extended this Ordinance in the manner as provided in said Section 658581 b). ORDTEM/ORD/PS -3- Ordinance No. Page Four Section 5. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Sections 65858 and 36937(b), and this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted in three 13) public places. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 16th day November, 1989. ATTEST Mayor, City of Temecula City C!~k, City of Temecula ORDTEM/OED/PS -~- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT MTG: California Highway Patrol &dditional CITY ~TDT DEPT: Traffic Patrol Hours CITY HGR RECOMMENDATION: Approve funding for additional C.H.P. hours for traffic enforcement for the months of May and June of 1990. Ammend 1990 budget for amount of $12,646.00 BACKGROUND: The need for additional traffic enforcement is apparent in the City. The feasibility of providing additional traffic enforcement services has been discussed with the California Highway Patrol. C.H.P. has indicated that additional traffic enforcement services could be provided to the City for a two month period, May and June 1990, for a total of 320 hours. The extra patrol hours would be tentatively scheduled for Monday through Friday of each week, between the hours from 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. FISCAL IMPACT $12,646.40 320 hours @ 36.72 hours 3,200 miles @ .28/mile Total $11,750.40 $ 896.00 $12,646.40 ALTERNATIVES Request services from Riverside Sheriff, however sufficient staff may not be available at this time. ATTACHMENTS Department of California Highway Patrol correspondence dated April 2. 1990. RESOLUTION NO. 90- as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $12,646 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL SERVICES BEGINNING MAY 1, 1990 The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order Section 1: That the FY 1989-90 Annual Budget of the City of Temecula is hereby amended to appropriate $12,646 for the purpose of providing additional California Highway Parol Services. Section 2: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. ATFEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] Resos/90-43 04/18/90 5:25pm Ftate of California-Business, Transportation and Housing Agency DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Rancho California Area 27685 Commerce Center Drive P. O. Box 2249 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-0112 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor April 2, 1990 City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 3000 Temecula, California 92390 Dear Mr. Aleshire: In order to assure understanding of the conditions under which the request for Departmental services has been granted, the following statement of understanding has been prepared. The Rancho California Area will provide forty (40) hours per week of additional traffic enforcement to augment regular services provided by the California Highway Patrol. The traffic enforcement is to take place within the Temecula city limits. The assignment will commence on May 1, 1990 and terminate no later than June 30, 1990. In the event of disaster or unforeseen emergency, this assignment may be cancelled without prior notice. Charges for California Highway Patrol services will be billed approximately as follows depending on the pay scale of the personnel assigned to the detail: Cost Estimate: 320 hours @ $36.72 per hour 3,200 automobile miles @ .28/mi. $11,750.40 $ 896.00 Total $12,646.40 Appropriate charges will be made for Departmental supplies expended, additional equipment utilized, damage to uniforms or property repaired or replaced at State expense, etc. which are directly related to the services provided. An invoice for reimbursement will be issued within 30 days of the termination of services. Payment should be made ~irect±? to the California Highway Patrol, Accounting Section, P.O. Box 898, Sacramento, CA 95804. No additional gifts, donatiens or gratuities maw be accepted by California Highway Patrol employees in their own behalf of the Oepartment, informal squad fund or other tocai funds. Please sign and return the original of this letter. retain the duplicate for your records. Tou may Very truly yours, D. (7. WEBB, Captain Commander The conditions stated above are hereby acknowledged. Authorized Signature TEMB~ULA COMMUNTT¥ B~RVTC~S D'rSTRTCT APRTL 24~ 2.990 - 8~00 P.Mo CALL TO ORDBR~ ROLL CALL.' Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks, Birdsall PRESENTATIONS/ PROCL~M~TIONB PUBLIC COMMENTB 1. Follow-up Report of Workshop meeting on &Dril 21, 1990 MANAGERS REPORT DIRECTORS REPORT ADJ'OURHHENT Next meeting: May 8, 1990, 7:00 p.m., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. :3/asenda/0424~0 1 04/19/90