Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
030816 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk(951)694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 8, 2016 —7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. No Closed Session Next in Order: Ordinance: 16-02 Resolution: 16-15 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Chaparral High School 2016 Spring Musical "The Addams Family" Invocation: Shawn Burgess of the Temecula Baha'i Community Flag Salute: Council Member Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Certificates of Participation to 2016 Youth in Government Program Participants Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Mr. Jeff Waugh PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of February 23, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of February 23, 2016. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as January 31, 2016. 2 5 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Buxton Company dba: Buxton for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment Report and Visitor Analysis RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Appropriate $10,000 from undesignated fund balance to the Economic Development Department's operating budget to cover the scope of work to be completed this fiscal year. 5.2 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Buxton Company dba: Buxton, in the amount of $50,000, for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment and Visitor Analysis Report for Fiscal Year 2016-17. 6 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with His Venture for the 2016 Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair (At the Recommendation of the Economic Development Committee Mayor Pro-Tem Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with His Venture for city-support costs, in the amount of $5,600 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2016 Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair. 7 Approve the Second Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Truax Development for the Potential Disposition of Property Located on Main Street in the City of Temecula (APNs 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) between the City of Temecula and Truax Development (Truax) for the potential disposition and development of the property located on Main Street in the City of Temecula (APNs 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007) (Subject Property). 8 Award a Construction Contract to DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. for the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation, PW12-14 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Award a Construction Contract to DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc., in the amount of $794,286.50, for the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation, PW12-14; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $158,857.30, which is equal to 20% of the Contract amount; 8.3 Make a finding that the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 3 9 Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho California Road, PW10-12 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the construction of the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho California Road, PW 10-12, as complete; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the Contract amount; 9.3 Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 10 Approve Payment to Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD) for the City of Temecula's Portion of the Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit for the Santa Margarita Watershed for Fiscal Year 2015-16 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve payment to Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD), in the amount of $431,073.53, for the City of Temecula's Portion of the Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit for the Santa Margarita Watershed for Fiscal Year 2015-16. 11 Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for Temecula Grand Prix Bicycle Race RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the Temecula Grand Prix Bicycle Race Special Event. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 16-01 Resolution: CSD 16-02 CALL TO ORDER: Vice President Michael McCracken ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, McCracken, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 12 Approve the Action Minutes of February 23, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of February 23, 2016. CSD BUSINESS 13 Receive and File Human Services Update (At the Request of Director Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the City Council receive and file this Human Services Update (At the Request of Director Naggar). 5 CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, March 22, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 6 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY— No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY— No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY— No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14 Approve Planning Application Numbers PA14-0051 and PA15-1664, Development Agreement and Specific Plan Amendments to Modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement and Specific Plan Timing Requirements for Improvements Required by the Existing Approvals for Phase II of Roripaugh Ranch RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 97121030) 14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 15-1664) 14.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14- 0051) ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD ******************** 7 JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn, Naggar Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans, Guerriero Baimbridge, Blair, Malmstrom, Puma, Moore 15 Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Planning Commission. 16 Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Old Town Local Review Board RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Old Town Local Review Board. JOINT MEETING ADJOURNMENT RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 17 City Council Travel/Conference Report March 2016 CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, March 22, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information)will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda,will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,Temecula, 8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website—www.cityoftemecula.org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 8 PRESENTATIONS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Presentation of Certificates of Participation to 2016 Youth in Government Program Participants PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: None BACKGROUND: On February 29 - March 1, 2016, 21 students participated in the City's annual Youth in Government program. The students, representing Chaparral High School, Great Oak High School and Temecula Valley High School, were selected to participate in the program through their AP Government classes. Students engaged in a competitive process to be selected as one of seven participants from each school. Upon arrival on the first day, the students received an overview of local government and its inner workings from Council Members. Students then selected various roles to emulate (i.e., City Council Members, Department Directors, Management Staff, etc.) and began researching and preparing reports and presentations for the mock City Council meeting to be held the following day. On the second day, students finalized their reports and held meetings with the Finance Director and City Manager in preparation for the mock City Council meeting. The remainder of the day included the mock City Council meeting and overall program debriefing. In appreciation of their hard work and dedication to the two-day event, the 2016 Youth In Government program participants are being recognized with Certificates of Participation. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Mr. Jeff Wa u h g The City Council would like to congratulate Mr. Jeff Waugh on his retirement from Temecula Valley High School after 25 years of dedicated service. Mr. Waugh instructed Advanced Placement Government, Economics, and served as athletic coach for football, soccer, and track for 12 seasons. He supervised and guided the Mock Trial program for 19 years, and led the Youth in Government program for 10 years. Mr. Waugh was also awarded District Teacher of the Year for 1999-2000. We are grateful for the many contributions Mr. Waugh has made to the youth in our community. We congratulate Mr. Waugh on his retirement and warmly wish him all the best in his future. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this eighth day of March, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Item No . 1 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager (� CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No . 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 23, 2016 –7:00 PM 5:30 PM - The City Council convened in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to three matters of pending litigation: (1) Hill v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1501349; (2) Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1512880; and (3) Scharpen Foundation v. Kamala Harris et al; Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1514022. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. At 5:30 PM Mayor Naggar called the City Council meeting to order and recessed to Closed Session to consider the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. The City Council meeting convened at 7:02 PM CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: The Spirit of Great Oak Band & Guard Invocation: Pastor Zachary Elliot of Fusion Christian Church Flag Salute: Council Member Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to The Spirit of Great Oak Band & Guard Action Minutes 022316 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS (None) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of February 9, 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of February 9, 2016. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City's Participation in a Police Services Joint Powers Authority Feasibility Study with Contract Cities (At the Request of Council Member Comerchero) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. Action Minutes 022316 2 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the City's participation in a Police Services Joint Powers Authority (JPA) Feasibility Study with other contract cities within Riverside County; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Participation/Cost Sharing Agreement with the City of San Jacinto for the City's share of the Feasibility Study. 5 Approve an Agreement with Michael Baker International for Additional Analyses for Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Temecula Creek Inn - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement for Additional Analyses with Michael Baker International, in the amount of $174,455, for an Environmental Impact Report for proposed Temecula Creek Inn. 6 Award a Construction Contract to Aghapy Group, Inc. for the Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Award a Construction Contract to Aghapy Group, Inc., in the amount of $1,471,777, for the Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09; 6.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed the Contingency Amount of $147,177, which is equal to 10% of the Contract Amount. 7 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Craftsmen Plumbing Heating & Cooling, Inc. for Routine Maintenance Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Craftsmen Plumbing Heating & Cooling, Inc., in the amount of$60,000, for Routine Maintenance Services. Action Minutes 022316 3 8 Grant Non-Exclusive Easements to Rancho California Water District in Connection with the Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR THE RELOCATION OF WATER FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTERSTATE-15 / STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE, PW04-08 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 922-210-057, 922-210-059, AND 922-210-060) 9 Establish a Time Limited Parking Restriction on Ritter Court Near Great Oak High School - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMITED PARKING RESTRICTION ON RITTER COURT BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 9:00 A.M. AND 12:00 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, EXCEPT HOLIDAYS RECESS At 7:26 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:30 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. Action Minutes 022316 4 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY— No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY— No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY— No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 12 Community Development Monthly Report 13 Police Department Monthly Report 14 Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 7:39 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 8, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 022316 5 Item No . 3 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Pam Espinoza, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $6,504,841.25. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 8th day of March, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02/11/2016 TOTAL CHECK RUN $ 577,565.39 02/18/2016 TOTAL CHECK RUN 5,485,564.35 02/11/2016 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 441,711.51 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/08/2016 COUNCIL MEETING: $6,504,841.25 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 2,209,108.29 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 2,545.06 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,458.10 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192,153.85 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 78,652.57 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 3,361,269.62 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"L"LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,783.99 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 15,540.22 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 36,746.50 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 7,250.00 300 INSURANCE FUND 34,726.82 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 34,102.97 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND (212.35) 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 7,819.31 340 FACILITIES 49,165.51 375 INTERN FELLOWSHIP FUND 45.66 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,400.00 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 53.73 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 53.73 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 53.73 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 53.73 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 53.73 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 322.24 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 129.14 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,252.84 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 366.14 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 38.72 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 305.25 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 49.49 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 86.73 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 733.42 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 29.96 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 36.89 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 33.95 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 359.98 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 615.99 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 101.56 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 41.85 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 90.60 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 31.34 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 299.60 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 181.80 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 354.64 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 6,622.24 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 37.02 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 84.55 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 589.50 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 77.20 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 31.05 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 38.79 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 1,764.17 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 28.41 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 6,569.91 $6,063,129.74 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 255,102.42 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 1,647.42 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,012.07 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRI 96,832.11 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 301.60 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,111.63 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"L"LAKE PARK MAINT 400.90 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 732.08 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,129.50 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 23,604.67 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 5,879.73 340 FACILITIES 11,422.55 375 INTERN FELLOWSHIP FUND 379.35 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 63.85 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 63.85 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 63.85 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 63.85 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 63.85 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 383.13 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 74.51 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CRE 49.99 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 59.31 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 10.71 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 120.06 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COU 21.87 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 30.77 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 204.15 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.35 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9.48 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 6.11 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 136.15 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELO 29.06 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOME 16.82 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTAT 14.57 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 34.03 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2.88 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 126.20 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 67.40 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 183.08 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 309.52 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 7.34 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 8.15 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 174.19 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 56.09 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITI 2.49 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 8.15 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 256.88 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTR 3.51 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 35,427.28 441,711.51 TOTAL BY FUND: $6,504,841.25 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2899 02/09/2016 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO BE 12.07 REVERSED 018570 ALLEN'S FLOWERS&PLANTS IG SUNSHINE FUND -63.05 014432 LANAIR GROUP,LLC MH PHONE CORDS 110.80 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO BE REVE 12.58 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 46.54 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 77.74 018627 GROSSMONT CUYAMACA KH 832 CLASS FOR PARK RANGER: 134.00 RAYA, 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 37.17 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 30.95 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH SUPPLIES FORYACART 4.53 WORKSHOP 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH SUPPLIES FOR YAC ART 31.30 WORKSHOP 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 14.74 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 13.12 007987 WALMART LW SUPPLIES FOR PC CHAIR 8.38 APPRECIATION 014980 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LW REGIS:30TH ANNUAL LAND USE 495.00 LAW CONF 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 16.15 017091 1800FLOWERS.COM GB SUNSHINE FUND 65.02 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO BE REVE 0.37 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO BE REVE 119.00 011253 WILSON CREEK WINERY IG EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TRAINING 1,393.82 &VINEYARDS 018654 FROMYOUFLOWERS.COM IG SUNSHINE FUND 71.25 018654 FROMYOUFLOWERS.COM IG SUNSHINE FUND 58.29 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING GB GLOBAL RETAIL REAL ESTATE CNF 530.00 5/22:DA 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING GB GLOBAL RETAIL REAL ESTATE CNF 530.00 5/22:KI 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING GB GLOBAL RETAIL REAL ESTATE CNF 530.00 002652 PAT&OSCARS RESTAURANT GB APPRECIATION LUNCHEON TVE2 316.33 013851 STORM SOURCE,LLC MHAPPOINTMENT PLUS:IT 20.00 018629 DUKE SERVICE COMPANY TG REPAIR OF THE COFFEE BREWER 153.00 FOR MPSC Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING GB CSUSM REGISTRATION:BUTLER& 50.00 DAMKO 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 44.67 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH SUPPLIES FORYACART 9.73 WORKSHOP 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 82.74 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 143.15 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 23.89 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 17.03 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 52.63 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 41.06 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 28.73 006952 PAYPAL KH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 251.70 TRANSACTION 018655 ADMITONE PRODUCTS.COM IG SMALLACRYLIC RAFFLE DRUM 88.03 001526 MICHAELS STORES INC AA CUSTOM FRAMES FOR TEMECULA 64.79 HAS HEART 015354 FACEBOOK.COM GB FACEBOOK PROMOTING CITY 23.23 GOVERNMENT 013564 TARGET CORPORATION IG OFFICE SUPPLIES:HANGERS 32.79 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO BE REVE 402.47 007044 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT RO RFRSHMNTS:MEETING WITH 35.12 CONSULTANT 015421 SURVEYMONKEY.COM RO COMMUNITY FEEDBACK 300.00 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES JC REGIST:FOR NLC 465.00 CONGRESSIONAL CONF 006952 PAYPAL JH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 70.50 TRANSACTION 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE JH'1 5 CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT 580.00 OFFICERS REVIEW 018626 WORTHINGTON DIRECT KH FOLDING ACTIVITY TABLES FOR 577.04 TCSD 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 41.51 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH SUPPLIES FOR YAC ART 8.00 WORKSHOP 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 12.21 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 34.02 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 58.32 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 188.02 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 79.13 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 50.04 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 20.68 009527 GEOTRUST INC MH SSL CERTIFICATES 498.00 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH SUPPLIES FORYACART 77.63 WORKSHOP 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 11.87 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 24.61 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 31.31 007282 AMAZON.COM,INC KH BOOKS&COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 235.17 018654 FROMYOUFLOWERS.COM IG SUNSHINE FUND -3.23 000277 S&S ARTS&CRAFTS INC IG OFFICE SUPPLIES:GREETING 19.00 CARDS 017300 ADOBE.COM IG ADOBE PHOTOSHOP FOR IT 9.99 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES REVERSED -12.40 IG FRAUDULENT CHARGES REVERSED -0.37 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING AA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: 50.00 COMERCHERO,J 008669 VONS AA REFRESHMENTS:CITY 75.92 MANAGER'S MTG 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES AA REGISTRATION:CA CITIES CONF 650.00 000795 FRED PRYOR MH MEMBERSHIP DUES:GUTIERREZ, 199.00 SEMI NARS-CAREERTRAC RICHARD 018628 FORTI NET INC MH FIREWALLSUPP/WEB FILTERING& 1,464.00 11,975.83 2901 02/11/2016 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC. FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT 5,461.00 5,461.00 2902 02/11/2016 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 8,829.05 8,829.05 303355 PAYMENT 2903 02/11/2016 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,128.45 1,128.45 SUPPORT 2904 02/15/2016 000444 INSTATAX(EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 23,128.22 23,128.22 2905 02/15/2016 000283 INSTATAX(IRS) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 81,408.04 81,408.04 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2906 02/11/2016 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA-PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,178.54 2,178.54 SOLUTION PAYMENT 2907 02/11/2016 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 11,786.75 11,786.75 SOLUTION 2908 02/11/2016 000245 PERS-HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH INSURANCE PAYMENT 105,927.02 PREMIUM PERS HEALTH INSURANCE PAYMENT 0.00 105,927.02 175273 02/11/2016 004973 ABACHERLI,LINDI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 490.00 490.00 175274 02/11/2016 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW STREETS 549.39 549.39 DIVISION 175275 02/11/2016 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW BACKFLOW TESTING SRVCS:VAR 50.00 LOCATIONS BACKFLOW REPAIRS:VARIOUS MEDIAN! 625.00 675.00 175276 02/11/2016 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY BATTERY REPLACEMENT:STA 73 116.73 116.73 CORPORATION 175277 02/11/2016 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA 326.66 (AFN) POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 421.42 748.08 175278 02/11/2016 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS AQUATICS STAFF CERTIFICATION 81.00 81.00 CARDS 175279 02/11/2016 000101 APPLE ONE INC TEMP HELP:ENERGOV PROJECT/CITY 2,592.18 2,592.18 CLERK 175280 02/11/2016 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC ppg tablets for chlor.sys:tem elem pool 1,754.68 1,754.68 175281 02/11/2016 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL SHIRTS-SPORTS PROGRAMS 5,350.32 5,350.32 PRODUCTS,INC 175282 02/11/2016 013482 BAS SECURITY JAN 16 SECURITY SRVCS: 1,646.80 1,646.80 HARVESTON LAKE 175283 02/11/2016 015765 BEISTLE COMPANY,THE PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIALS: 1,460.00 1,460.00 PREVENTION 175284 02/11/2016 012583 BLANCAY PRICE OCT LDSCP PLAN CHK& 10,080.00 10,080.00 REVIEW:PLANNING 175285 02/11/2016 000154 C S M F O MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:GRACIANO, 110.00 RUDY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:HENNESSY,JE 110.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:BROWN,PASC 110.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:JONES,SHAW 50.00 380.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175286 02/11/2016 003138 CAL MAT ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW ST MAI NT 413.77 ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW ST MAI NT 413.02 ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW ST MAI NT 380.24 1,207.03 175287 02/11/2016 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY JAN 16 HELIUM TANK REFILLS:CSD 65.35 65.35 EVENTS 175288 02/11/2016 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION Online database subscription-Police 162.99 162.99 175289 02/11/2016 018018 CHILDRESS,DEBBORA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 201.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 100.80 302.40 175290 02/11/2016 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC. JAN 16 FLEX PROCESSING FEES 265.50 265.50 175291 02/11/2016 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 24.00 24.00 CHARITIES,C/O WELLS FARGO PAYMENT BANK 175292 02/11/2016 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SECURITY ALARM SYS MAINT SRVC: 75.00 75.00 TCC 175293 02/11/2016 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL electrical supplies:of parking garage 133.65 DIST. MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:LIBRARY 54.00 187.65 175294 02/11/2016 014521 COSTAR GROUP FEB 16 WEB SUBSCRIPTION:ECO DEV 415.00 415.00 INFORMATION,INC 175295 02/11/2016 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 MISC.SUPPLIES:TVM 2.47 EXHI BITS/PROGRAMS MISC.SUPPLIES:TVM EXHIBITS/PROGW 98.50 MISC.SUPPLIES:TVM EXHIBITS/PROGR) 136.13 MISC SUPPLIES:ARTS CULTURE&EVEN 72.06 MISC.SUPPLIES:HIGH HOPES PGRM 139.08 448.24 175296 02/11/2016 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING& PLUMBING SRVCS:FOC 290.00 290.00 HVAC INC 175297 02/11/2016 010486 D D LTRAFFIC,INC. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS:PW 7,958.00 7,958.00 TRAFFIC 175298 02/11/2016 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON PLOTTER PAPER&INK:LIBRARY 358.56 358.56 COMPANY INC 175299 02/11/2016 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTALS:LIGHT 891.80 SRVCS TOWER/GENERATOR PORTABLE RESTROOMS:GREAT OAK H 52.80 944.60 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175300 02/11/2016 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL& FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:CODE ENF 108.05 LUBRICANTS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:INFO TECH 47.17 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 49.78 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 227.49 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TRAFFIC DIV 187.97 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TCSD 401.83 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:POLICE DEP' 53.24 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 621.48 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 639.42 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:BLDG&SAFE 118.72 2,455.15 175301 02/11/2016 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER FEB WATER METER:32131 S LOOP RD 44.07 DIST DCDA FEB WATER METER:32131 S LOOP RD L[ 475.38 FEB WATER METER:32131 S LOOP RD BI 104.84 624.29 175302 02/11/2016 016839 EHS INTERNATIONAL,INC. JAN 16 CNSLTNT SRVCS:EMPLOYEE 250.00 250.00 SAFETY PRG 175303 02/11/2016 003171 EMPIRE ECONOMICS INC CONSULTING SRVCS:CFD-PAN AREA 7,250.00 7,250.00 175304 02/11/2016 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING JAN 16 RESTROOM MAI NT SVCS:PARK 5,637.00 5,637.00 MAI NT. 175305 02/11/2016 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE NOV EIR FOR PROPOSED ALTAIR 1,052.17 1,052.17 ASSOC. SPECIFIC PLA 175306 02/11/2016 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION NOV BLDG PLAN REVIEW SRVCS:B&S 4,975.70 4,975.70 DEPT 175307 02/11/2016 015090 EVAPCO PRODUCTS,INC. JAN 16 MAI NT SVCS FOR WATER 550.00 550.00 SYSTEM:CIVIC 175308 02/11/2016 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 901.11 901.11 175309 02/11/2016 009953 FEDERAL CLEANING FEB 16 JANITORIALSRVCS:POLICE 854.50 854.50 CONTRACTORS MALL OFC 175310 02/11/2016 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 350.00 350.00 175311 02/11/2016 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 289.35 289.35 175312 02/11/2016 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 150.00 150.00 175313 02/11/2016 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 45.00 45.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175314 02/11/2016 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES: 56.50 THEATER SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES:TH 45.63 SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES:TH 305.17 SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES:TH 92.22 SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES:TH 260.79 SOUND/LIGHTING&MISC SUPPLIES:TH 26.79 787.10 175315 02/11/2016 016184 FUN EXPRESS,LLC SUPPLIES:PENCIL ASSORTMENT: 30.38 30.38 TCSD 175316 02/11/2016 010326 G E MOBILE WATER,INC APPARATUS MAINT SUPPLIES:STA 63.72 63.72 84/73 175317 02/11/2016 001937 GALLS INC EQUIP:POLICE VOLUNTEERS 20.03 EQUIP:POLICE VOLUNTEERS 10.31 30.34 175318 02/11/2016 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC Misc.exhibit supplies:history museum. 126.53 126.53 175319 02/11/2016 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS JAN 16 MISC OFC SUPPLIES-CITY 428.71 INC CLERK/CIT JAN 16 MISC OFC SUPPLIES:FINANCE 106.71 535.42 175320 02/11/2016 018650 GOMEZ-LEE,VANESSA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM 169.00 169.00 RENTAL:HARVESTO N 175321 02/11/2016 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC JAN 16 MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES:TVM 7.55 EXHIBITS JAN 16 VAR MAINT SUPPLIES:PARK MAlt 825.05 JAN 16 VAR MAINT SUPPLIES:PW STREE 813.55 JAN 16 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:THEATEF 155.13 JAN 16 MAINT SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S M 216.77 JAN 16 MAINT SUPPLIES:TCC 33.47 JAN 16 MAINT SUPPLIES:VAR TCSD LOC 281.56 JAN 16 VAR MAINT SUPPLIES:PARK MAlt 48.01 JAN 16 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:LIBRARY 20.37 JAN 16 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES PARKING 22.66 JAN 16 MAINT SUPPLIES:VAR LOCATION 730.65 JAN 16 MISC SMALL TOOLS&EQUIP:PV 283.65 3,438.42 175322 02/11/2016 000520 HDL COREN&CONE INC JAN-MAR 16 CNSLTNG 5,250.00 5,250.00 SRVCS:PROPERTY TAX 175323 02/11/2016 012204 HERITAGE FAMILY MINISTRIES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 500.50 500.50 175324 02/11/2016 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S 52.80 52.80 THE MUSEUM Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175325 02/11/2016 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT plotter ink:Central Services 286.20 286.20 SOLUTIONS 175326 02/11/2016 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 40.00 40.00 PAYMENT 175327 02/11/2016 010412 JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS GENERATOR REPAIR:STA 73 5,202.50 5,202.50 175328 02/11/2016 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY,INC. paper,binding&laminating 41.14 41.14 175329 02/11/2016 018500 LABOR READY SOUTHWEST, 01/09-01/15 TEMP HELP: 822.00 INC STREET&PARK MAI NT 01/16-01/22 TEMP HELP:STREET&PARK 1,315.20 2,137.20 175330 02/11/2016 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 2016AGENCY MEMBERSHIP DUES 22,615.00 22,615.00 175331 02/11/2016 018434 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE Consulting srvcs:city manager's office 4,000.00 4,000.00 175332 02/11/2016 018651 LOPEZ,VERONICA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTO N 175333 02/11/2016 014365 MAILFINANCE,INC. 11/29-2/28/16 POSTAGE METER LEASE 1,210.68 1,210.68 :CENTR 175334 02/11/2016 007214 MAUREEN KANE& TECH TRAINING:RAMIREZ,ERIKA 1,600.00 1,600.00 ASSOCIATES INC 3/15-3/18 175335 02/11/2016 014392 MC COLLOUGH,JILL DENISE FEB 16 MAINT INTERIOR 500.00 PLANTS:CIVIC CTR FEB 16 MAINT INTERIOR PLANTS:LIBRAI 200.00 700.00 175336 02/11/2016 016445 MKB PRINTING& Finance Department envelopes, #10 124.96 PROMOTIONAL INC BUSINESS CARDS:D.CARNELIS 43.64 168.60 175337 02/11/2016 017861 MYTHOS TECHNOLOGY INC IT MONITORING SRVCS:TVE2 100.00 100.00 175338 02/11/2016 018652 NANIGIAN,ROBERT REFUND:ARGENTINE TANGO 2800.103 67.20 67.20 Page.8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175339 02/11/2016 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 12/23-01/22 DRINKING 21.22 AMERICA WATER:HISTORY 12/23-1/22/16 BOTTLED WATER SERVICE 6.47 12/23-1/22/16 BOTTLED WATER SVC:CIT 35.11 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:HARVEST 6.47 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:SKATE PF 6.47 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:PBSP 17.26 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:TESC PO, 6.47 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:CHILDRE 27.50 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:CRC 43.34 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:TCC 23.96 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:FOC 85.60 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:LIBRARY 36.46 12/23-01/22 DRINKING WATER:THEATER 42.93 359.26 175340 02/11/2016 010167 ODYSSEY POWER UPS REPAIRS:CIVIC CENTER 2,161.99 2,161.99 CORPORATION 175341 02/11/2016 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Misc office supplies:Prevention- 18.12 DIV MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW CIP 15.98 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW NDPES 15.98 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 15.07 Misc office supplies:Prevention- 108.35 173.50 175342 02/11/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PLANNING 306.85 306.85 175343 02/11/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:TCSD 219.92 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 50.39 270.31 175344 02/11/2016 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS INC HELMETS:POLICE MOTORCYCLE 531.89 531.89 FLEET 175345 02/11/2016 010338 POOL&ELECTRICAL POOL SUPPLIES&CHEMICALS:VAR 796.18 PRODUCTS INC SITES POOL SUPPLIES&CHEMICALS:VAR SIT 567.01 1,363.19 175346 02/11/2016 010338 POOL&ELECTRICAL POOL SUPPLIES&CHEMICALS:VAR 264.99 264.99 PRODUCTS INC SITES 175347 02/11/2016 005820 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 384.70 384.70 INC 175348 02/11/2016 017431 PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE PAYMENT 8,196.60 8,196.60 CO 175349 02/11/2016 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL JAN UNIFORMS/FLR MATS/TWLS:CIVIC 579.78 579.78 SUPPLY CNTR/PR Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175350 02/11/2016 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN VEHICLE MAINT:FIRE PREV 567.04 567.04 MERCURY 175351 02/11/2016 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS:RANCHO CA 60.07 60.07 RD 175352 02/11/2016 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR DEC VEHICLE DETAILING SRVCS:LAND 21.00 21.00 WASH DEV/TCS 175353 02/11/2016 010777 RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE JAN-MARANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES 39,236.97 39,236.97 OFFICE 175354 02/11/2016 014347 ROBERTS,PATRICIA G. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 262.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 262.50 525.00 175355 02/11/2016 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE DEC LEGAL ADVERTISING:CITY CLERK 146.04 DEC PUBLIC NOTICE ADS:PLANNI NG 1,462.49 1,608.53 175356 02/11/2016 009980 SANBORN,GWYNETH A. COUNTRY LIVE!@ THE MERC 784.50 784.50 175357 02/11/2016 017113 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS-CHILDREN'S BOOKS: 5.69 5.69 PUBLISHING, LIBRARY 175358 02/11/2016 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV- SUPPORT PMT 100.00 100.00 CENTRAL 175359 02/11/2016 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 2/4/16 537.00 537.00 175360 02/11/2016 013695 SHRED-IT US JV,LLC DOCUMENT COLLECTION&SHRED 63.00 SRVCS:C.C. DOCUMENT COLLECTION&SHRED SRV 16.54 DOCUMENT COLLECTION&SHRED SRV 17.70 1/15 DOC SHRED SRVCS:TEMECULA PO 16.54 113.78 175361 02/11/2016 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1801: 296.40 PLANNING PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1680:PLANNIP 148.20 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1729:PLANNIP 148.20 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-0694:PLANNIP 158.20 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-0520-21:PLAN 148.20 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-0520-21:PLAN 59.02 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1561:PLANNIP 296.40 1,254.62 175362 02/11/2016 000645 SMART&FINAL INC MISC SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 82.67 82.67 PGRM Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175364 02/11/2016 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JAN 2-29-953-8447:31738 WOLF VLY RD 25.88 JAN 2-30-220-8749:45850 N WOLF CREEK 316.82 JAN 2-29-657-2332:45538 REDWOOD RD 25.88 JAN 2-29-953-8249:46497 WOLF CREEK 1 27.86 JAN 2-00-397-5067:TCSD SVC LEV C 2,434.38 JAN 2-29-224-0173:32364 OVERLAND TRI 1,038.69 JAN 2-36-641-3912:27498 ENTERPRISE C 38.34 JAN 2-36-641-3839:27498 ENTERPRISE C 34.38 JAN 2-21-981-4720:30153 TEM PKWY TPF 26.46 JAN 2-28-904-7706:32329 OVERLAND TRI 149.78 JAN 2-30-520-4414:32781 TEM PKWY LS3 1,246.25 JAN 2-02-351-4946:41845 6TH ST 912.98 JAN 2-14-204-1615:30027 FRONT ST RDI( 39.14 JAN 2-18-937-3152:28314 MERCEDES 467.99 JAN 2-19-171-8568:28300 MERCEDES 416.81 JAN 2-29-933-3831:43230 BUS PARK DR 1,540.77 JAN 2-31-912-7494:28690 MERCEDES 1,634.28 JAN 2-35-707-0010:33451 S HWY-79 PED 58.63 JAN 2-31-419-2873:43000 HWY-395 28.14 JAN 2-29-953-8082:31523 WOLF VLY RD 28.73 JAN 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT FRONT ST 1,310.71 JAN 2-31-536-3481:41902 MAIN ST 283.12 JAN 2-29-295-3510:32211 WOLF VLY RD 785.94 JAN 2-31-536-3226:28690 MERCEDES 1,582.99 JAN 2-32-903-8293:41000 MAIN ST 11,784.27 JAN 2-25-393-4681:41951 MORAGA RD 287.58 JAN 2-35-403-6337:41375 MCCABE CT 810.43 JAN 2-35-664-9053:29119 MARGARITA RC 183.34 JAN 2-00-397-5042:43200 BUS PARK DR 3,231.83 JAN 2-28-629-0507:30600 PAUBA RD 5,213.25 JAN 2-02-502-8077:43210 BUS PARK DR E 375.01 JAN 2-31-282-0665:27407 DIAZ RD PED 29.06 JAN 2-31-031-2616:27991 DIAZ RD PED 29.06 JAN 2-31-536-3655:41904 MAIN ST 215.60 JAN 2-34-333-3589:41702 MAIN ST 29.74 JAN 2-29-657-2787:41638 WINCHESTER f 28.25 JAN 2-29-807-1093:28079 DIAZ RD PED 28.54 JAN 2-29-807-1226:28077 DIAZ RD PED 27.59 JAN 2-29-223-8607:42035 2ND ST PED 740.99 37,469.49 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175365 02/11/2016 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JAN 095-167-7907-2:30650 PAUBA RD 482.12 JAN 117-188-6393-6:32131 S LOOP RD 55.58 JAN 101-525-1560-6:27415 ENTERPRISE 332.01 JAN 026-671-2909-8:42051 MAIN ST 703.83 JAN 028-025-1468-3:41375 MCCABE CT 106.71 JAN 181-383-8881-6:28314 MERCEDES S186.64 JAN 129-535-4236-7:41000 MAIN ST 2,645.50 JAN 129-582-9784-3:43230 BUS PARK DR 182.83 JAN 021-725-0775-4:41845 6TH ST 385.96 JAN 091-024-9300-5:30875 RANCHO VIST 3,966.78 JAN 101-525-0950-0:28816 PUJOL ST 230.42 JAN 133-040-7373-0:43210 BUS PARK DR 37.25 JAN 055-461-2483-4:40135 VILLAGE RD 219.07 JAN 125-244-2108-3:30600 PAUBA RD 858.82 JAN 091-085-1632-0:41951 MORAGA RD 17.36 JAN 196-025-0344-3:42081 MAIN ST 232.87 10,643.75 175366 02/11/2016 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control srvcs:var fire sta- 80.00 CONTROLINC PEST CONTROL SRVCS:RRSP 94.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP 70.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP 70.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:WOLF CREEK F 49.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:CITY RIGHT-OF 94.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:CITY RIGHT-OF 136.00 593.00 175367 02/11/2016 005786 SPRINT DEC 26-JAN 25 CELLULAR 4,467.66 4,467.66 USAGE/EQUIP 175368 02/11/2016 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS:HUMAN SRVCS 178.05 178.05 PGRM 175369 02/11/2016 018653 STAGNER,NATALIE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTON 175373 02/11/2016 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 8,078.01 8,078.01 COMPANY 175374 02/11/2016 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE 973.80 973.80 COMPANY PAYMENT 175375 02/11/2016 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:JRC 140.00 140.00 CLEANING 175376 02/11/2016 014420 STEVE SPANGLER,INC. MISC SUPPLIES:PENNYPICKLE'S 460.03 460.03 PGRMS 175377 02/11/2016 003840 STRONGS PAINTING PAINTING SRVCS:HARV LAKE PARK 2,000.00 2,000.00 GAZEBOS Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175378 02/11/2016 007273 STUMPS PRINTING COMPANY MISC SUPPLIES:RECREATION PGRM 1,158.69 1,158.69 INC 175379 02/11/2016 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION DUES PAYMENT 4,922.00 4,922.00 175380 02/11/2016 017131 TEMECULA HILLS CHRISTIAN REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:RRSP 175381 02/11/2016 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY LOCKSMITH SERVICES:THEATER 985.00 CENTR LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CRC 35.16 1,020.16 175382 02/11/2016 000339 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST CA PENAL CODE 2016 217.35 217.35 PBLSHNG PAMPHLETS:POLICE 175383 02/11/2016 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:LIBRARY 599.19 599.19 175384 02/11/2016 017430 TRANSAMERICA LIFE TRANSAMERICA ACCIDENT 2,873.04 2,873.04 INSURANCE CO ADVANTAGE PMT 175385 02/11/2016 017579 U.S.HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL MEDICALSCREENINGS:HR 99.00 MEDICAL SCREENINGS:HR 100.00 199.00 175386 02/11/2016 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE JAN UNDERGROUND UTILITY 199.50 199.50 ALERT LOCATOR:PW TRAF 175387 02/11/2016 002110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH EQUIP RENTALS:VARIOUS PARKS 669.81 669.81 AMERICA 175388 02/11/2016 000325 UNITED WAY EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 5.00 5.00 PAYMENT 175389 02/11/2016 012549 UPODIUM Vehicle maintenance:Sta 84— 64.06 64.06 175390 02/11/2016 014848 VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS, DEC TICKETING SERVICES:THEATER 39.00 39.00 LLC 175391 02/11/2016 014954 VANDER INTERMEDIATE LIGHT TOWER RENTAL:WINTER 646.48 646.48 HOLDING WONDERLAND 175392 02/11/2016 016094 VAVRINEK,TRINE,DAY&CO AUDIT SRVCS:FINANCE DEPT 7,230.00 7,230.00 LLP 175393 02/11/2016 004789 VERIZON JAN INTERNETSVCS:THEATER 110.00 110.00 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175394 02/11/2016 007987 WALMART MISC SUPPLIES:STN 73 292.24 MISC SUPPLIES:TEAM PACE PGRM 78.19 MISCSUPPLIES:PENNYPICKLE EXHIBIT! 44.56 414.99 175395 02/11/2016 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 1/1-15/16 ROW TRIMMING:CITYWIDE 13,720.00 1/1-15/16 TREE TRIMSAND REMOVALS:1 1,078.00 14,798.00 175396 02/11/2016 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE FY 15/16 WRCOG MEMBERSHIP DUES 13,424.45 13,424.45 COUNCI L OF 175397 02/11/2016 004567 WITCHER ELECTRIC LIGHTING SYSTEM REPAIRS:OLD 2,161.00 TOWN ELECTRICAL SERVICES:CIVIC CENTER 725.00 ELECTRICAL IMPRVMNTS:EOC RADIO R 6,000.00 electrical repairs:rrsp&riverton parks 575.00 9,461.00 175398 02/11/2016 017053 WOHLFORD,CHAD TYLER Consulting srvcs:cost alloc&user fee 4,987.50 4,987.50 175399 02/11/2016 009173 WORD MILL PUBLISHING SEPT ADVERTISING:HEALTH FAIR 375.00 375.00 175400 02/11/2016 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL FEB JANITORIALSVCS:CITY FACS 23,329.97 SERVICES,INC FEB JANITORIAL SRVCS:POLICE OLD TC 295.84 23,625.81 175401 02/11/2016 000348 ZIGLER,GAIL REI MB:ART OFF THE WALLS/MARDI 443.24 443.24 GRAS SUPP Grand total for UNION BANK: 577,565.39 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 02/11/2016 9:14:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA 134 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 577,565.39 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2900 02/16/2016 000246 PERS(EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 40,180.65 40,180.65 RETIREMENT) 2909 02/16/2016 001035 C R&R INC JUL-DEC'15 TRASH HAULING 3,359,979.00 3,359,979.00 SERVICES 2910 02/18/2016 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE JAN'16TUMF PAYMENT 27,759.41 27,759.41 COUNCI L OF 175402 02/11/2016 000253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR CITY NEWSLETTER- 6,614.72 6,614.72 PERMIT#5 175403 02/18/2016 018674 ABC TREE FARMS LLC REFUND:ENG GRAD DEP:LD15-2879 4,000.00 4,000.00 175404 02/18/2016 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES,LLC HVAC REPAIR:STA 84 583.04 583.04 175405 02/18/2016 005058 ADAMS,AARON REIMB:LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CITY 507.95 507.95 MGR CONF. 175406 02/18/2016 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW STREETS 290.26 290.26 DIVISION 175407 02/18/2016 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT steam table rental:Christmas dinner 229.19 229.19 175408 02/18/2016 009787 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC Vehicle repair&maint srvcs:pw 60.54 60.54 175409 02/18/2016 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA 443.80 (AFN) POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 423.80 867.60 175410 02/18/2016 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS AQUATICS STAFF CERTIFICATION 54.00 54.00 CARDS 175411 02/18/2016 018676 AMNIPOUR&ASSC&ELIJAH SETTLEMENT&RELEASE:PITTS, 3,000.00 3,000.00 PITTS ELIJAH 175412 02/18/2016 011954 BAKER&TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 1,766.37 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY 204.85 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY 173.46 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY 119.05 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY 90.52 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 13.24 2,367.49 175413 02/18/2016 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL uniform embroidery:Aquatics 129.60 129.60 PRODUCTS,INC Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175414 02/18/2016 014718 BELLAMY,KRISTAANN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 205.80 205.80 175415 02/18/2016 018673 BISH LAW SETTLEMENTAND RELEASE: 30,000.00 30,000.00 HANSON,CAREN 175416 02/18/2016 018408 BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL JAN 16 POOLMAINTSERVICES:CRC 1,050.00 1,050.00 SERVICE AND TES 175417 02/18/2016 015834 BOYER,WAYNE E. TRAFFIC UNIFORMS-POLICE 2,840.10 2,840.10 175418 02/18/2016 017115 BUREAU OF OFFICE TRANSCRIPTION SRVCS:TEMECULA 35.48 35.48 SERVICES,INC POLICE 175419 02/18/2016 003138 CAL MAT ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW ST MAI NT 94.82 94.82 175420 02/18/2016 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JAN 16 FINGERPRINTING SVCVS: 3,825.00 3,825.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING INTERNS/HR/ 175421 02/18/2016 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY HELIUM TANKS RENTALS:TCSD 65.35 65.35 175422 02/18/2016 003997 COAST RECREATION INC PLAY EQUIPMENT PARTS:WOLF 738.87 738.87 CREEK PARK 175423 02/18/2016 014520 COLD STAR,INC ADDT'LSNOW:2015 WINTER 1,247.40 1,247.40 WONDERLAND 175424 02/18/2016 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS INSTALL PANIC BUTTONS: 1,335.00 1,335.00 JRC/HARV/SKATE/PB 175425 02/18/2016 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:CIVIC 223.56 DIST. CENTER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARK: 12.96 236.52 175426 02/18/2016 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 MISC SUPPLIES:ARTS CULTURE& 275.52 EVENTS SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 218.96 MISC SUPPLIES:ARTS CULTURE&EVEN 194.54 689.02 175427 02/18/2016 017542 COX,KRISTI LYN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 369.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 268.80 638.40 175428 02/18/2016 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING& INSTALL FREEZER:PBSP SNACK BAR 1,080.00 HVACINC STATION MAINTENANCE:STA92 514.38 1,594.38 175429 02/18/2016 014454 CRAMER,MATTHEW REIMB:CA NARCOTIC CANINE ASSOC 223.26 223.26 TRAINING Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175430 02/18/2016 017862 CRESTLINE SPECIALITIES,INC PROMO ITEM:HUMAN SERVICES 498.42 498.42 PGRM 175431 02/18/2016 018491 CRONBERG PHOTOGRAPHY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 560.00 560.00 175432 02/18/2016 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL PORTABLE RESTROOMS:ELECTRIC 24,549.00 24,549.00 SRVCS LIGHT PARAD 175433 02/18/2016 016756 DOCTOR'S NUTRITIONAL K-9 FOOD-POLICE 161.25 161.25 PRODUCTS 175434 02/18/2016 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY FEB 16 STATE LEGIS CONSULTING 3,500.00 3,500.00 LLC SVCS:CM 175435 02/18/2016 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE NOV 15 ADDT'LANALYSIS:JEFFERSON 1,606.80 1,606.80 ASSOC. AVE EIR 175436 02/18/2016 015090 EVAPCO PRODUCTS,INC. FEB 16 MAINT SVCS FOR WATER 550.00 550.00 SYSTEM:CIVIC 175437 02/18/2016 004836 EWING IRRIGATION irrig control upgrade:vail ranch slope 4,418.33 4,418.33 PRODUCTS INC 175438 02/18/2016 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE,INC. irrig controller upgrade:vailranchslope 704.07 IRRIGATION REPAIRS VAIL RANCH SLOI 391.74 IRRIG REPAIRS:VILLAGES:VAIL RANCH: 278.53 1,374.34 175439 02/18/2016 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 01/13-01/20 EXP MAILSVCS: 155.55 02/01/16 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS:CIP 50.80 206.35 175440 02/18/2016 011145 FOSTER,JILL CHRISTINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,929.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,064.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 387.10 4,380.60 175441 02/18/2016 001937 GALLS INC EQUIP:POLICE VOLUNTEERS 31.61 31.61 175442 02/18/2016 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS JAN 16 OFFICE SUPPLIES:VAR FIRE 679.11 INC STATION JAN 16 MISC OFC SUPPLIES:PUBLIC W( 379.16 JAN 16 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:INFO TE 5.39 1,063.66 175443 02/18/2016 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC STTLMNT:MUSIC FOR THE HEART 1,319.04 1,319.04 SOCIETY 2/13/16 175444 02/18/2016 003792 GRAINGER MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:PW STREET 811.06 MAINT MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:PW STREET MAII 167.02 978.08 175445 02/18/2016 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL FEB'16 LEASE COPIES:CITY 520.09 520.09 SVCS HALL/OFF-SITE Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175446 02/18/2016 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC JAN 16 HRDWR SUPPLIES:VAR FIRE 1,029.28 1,029.28 STATIONS 175447 02/18/2016 015686 HEARTBEATS PERFORMANCE:DRUM CIRCLES 275.00 275.00 175448 02/18/2016 016298 HORN CLINIC,THE SETTLEMENT:SPEAKEASY..MERC 452.90 452.90 02/13/16 175449 02/18/2016 016564 IMPACT TELECOM JAN 800 SERVICES:CIVIC CENTER 55.62 55.62 175450 02/18/2016 013286 INTRADO,INC. JAN ENTERPRISE 911 SVC:IT 330.00 330.00 175451 02/18/2016 004115 K T U&ASSOCIATES 10/01-11/30/15 TRAILS/BIKEWAYS 1,845.75 1,845.75 MSTR PLAN 175452 02/18/2016 017118 KRACH,BREE B. AWARDS&TROPHIES:TCSD EVENTS. 443.18 ENGRAVED GAVELS&PLAQUES:COUNC 118.80 561.98 175453 02/18/2016 013722 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES INC TRAFFIC I M PACT ANALYSIS:HILTON 5,220.00 5,220.00 SUITES 175454 02/18/2016 018500 LABOR READY SOUTHWEST, 01/23-01/29 TEMP HELP: 1,644.00 1,644.00 INC STREET&PARK MAI NT 175455 02/18/2016 004412 LEANDER,KERRY D. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 840.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 252.00 1,092.00 175456 02/18/2016 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC MISC.SUPPLIES FOR 3 931.66 931.66 POOLS:AQUATICS 175457 02/18/2016 009263 LOWES HIW INC WASHER/DRYERAND BBQ:FIRE 201.03 201.03 STATION 73 175458 02/18/2016 008610 M C R STAMPS PERFORMANCES:HIGH HOPES 25.00 25.00 PROGRAM 175459 02/18/2016 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS misc sign supplies:pw street maint div 58.20 misc sign supplies:pw street maint div 48.88 107.08 175460 02/18/2016 004141 MAINTEX INC MISC CUSTODIALSUPPLIES:VAR 2,075.01 2,075.01 LOCATIONS 175461 02/18/2016 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC FLOOR EQUIP PREV MAI NT:CIVIC 1,094.36 1,094.36 CENTER 175462 02/18/2016 015959 MEHEULA MUSIC SETTLEMENT::"WILLIE K"02/10/16 932.50 932.50 PRODUCTIONS Page-.4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175463 02/18/2016 015259 MERCURY DISPOSAL HOUSEHOLD BATTERY RECYCLING 431.68 431.68 SYSTEMS,INC. PROGRAM 175464 02/18/2016 018314 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC. P/E 12/31/15 TRAFFIC STUDY:ALDI 7,250.00 MARKET P/E 09/27 TRAFFIC IMPACTANALYSIS:GP 3,211.50 P/E 12/31 TRAFFIC IMPACTANALYSIS:GP 840.00 P/E 11/29/15 ENVRNMNTLSRVCS:PARK 550.00 11,851.50 175465 02/18/2016 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC MISC.BOOKS,AUDIO,DVDS.:LIBRARY 153.41 153.41 175466 02/18/2016 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING install fence post caps&ramp:civ ctr 500.00 500.00 INC. 175467 02/18/2016 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY, MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:VAR 271.43 INC PARKS MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:VAR PARK 89.49 360.92 175468 02/18/2016 016445 MKB PRINTING& MISC.PRINTING/BUSINESS CARDS- 493.56 493.56 PROMOTIONAL INC PLANNING 175469 02/18/2016 018677 MURA-SMITH,SHELLEY REFUND:LIBRARY MATERIALS 10.99 10.99 175470 02/18/2016 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL:WIGLE, 1,409.40 1,409.40 ASSN E LSA 175471 02/18/2016 018099 NATIONAL SAFETY DOT DRUG/ALCOHOL TESTING SVCS: 150.00 150.00 COMPLIANCE HR 175472 02/18/2016 015164 NATURES IMAGE,INC JAN 16 PECHANGA PKWY ENVIRN 1,006.60 1,006.60 MITIGATION 175473 02/18/2016 018402 NEWSMINDED,INC 1/3-1/30 NEWSPAPER 118.75 118.75 DELIVERY:MPSC 175474 02/18/2016 018600 OCCHIPINTI&SILHAN INC VEHICLE REPAIR:PREVENTION 605.94 605.94 175475 02/18/2016 010167 ODYSSEY POWER UPS PREVENTATIVE REPAIR& 1,750.05 1,750.05 CORPORATION MAINT:CIVIC CN 175476 02/18/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:T.C.C. 207.60 207.60 TRAILER 175477 02/18/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 120.00 120.00 MAINT 175478 02/18/2016 018678 OLSEN,JAMIE PERFORMANCE @ ART OFF THE 75.00 75.00 WALLS 2/5 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175479 02/18/2016 013127 ON STAGE MUSICALS TICKET SALES SETTLEMENT FOR 7,948.58 7,948.58 THAT'S ITALI 175480 02/18/2016 013198 ORTENZO-HAYES,KRISTINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 739.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 739.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 499.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 352.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 352.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 352.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 352.80 3,389.40 175481 02/18/2016 015033 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL 11/28-12/31 EIR:TEMECULA GATEWAY 4,095.00 4,095.00 CONSULTANTS PROJ 175482 02/18/2016 008830 PI NA,ART REIMB:'16 RSBITE JAN MTG 51.72 51.72 175483 02/18/2016 014957 PRN PRODUCTIONS COMEDY @ THE MERC 2/12/16 282.80 282.80 175484 02/18/2016 012904 PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN JAN PLAN REVIEWSRVCS: 9,424.10 9,424.10 PREVENTION 175485 02/18/2016 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE BANNER PROGRAM:ECON DEV 56.16 56.16 ADVERTISING 175486 02/18/2016 013721 PROPET DISTRIBUTORS INC PET WASTE BAGS:VARIOUS PARKS 2,763.95 2,763.95 175487 02/18/2016 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL NOV-JAN UNIFORM/MATS/TWL 2,651.58 2,651.58 SUPPLY RENTALS:CITY FA 175488 02/18/2016 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER FEB VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC 6,740.33 DISTRICT LEV C FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW FAC 3,330.04 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW VARIOUS 936.71 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW CIP 897.35 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW OLD TOW 430.88 FEB VAR WATER METERS:VAR FIRE STN 295.47 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW MAINT 201.59 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW MAINT 181.67 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW JRC 111.17 JAN COMM WATER METER:28640 PUJOL 9.30 13,134.51 175489 02/18/2016 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS REPRODUCTION SRVCS:PARK AND 61.15 RIDE REPRODUCTION SRVCS:BUTTERFIELD 15.88 REPRODUCTION SRVCS:BUTTERFIELD 10.80 87.83 175490 02/18/2016 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO DEC EMERGENCY RADIO RENTALS: 3,188.45 3,188.45 TECHNOLOGY POLICE Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175491 02/18/2016 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 11/12/15-12/9/15 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,678,577.01 1,678,577.01 DEPT 175492 02/18/2016 001365 RIVERSIDE,COUNTY OF HEALTH PERMIT:ROD RUN'16 412.00 412.00 175493 02/18/2016 012174 RUHNAU RUHNAU CLARKE& JAN DSGN OF FIRE STN 73 1,320.00 1,320.00 ASSOC. UPGRADE:PW CIP 175494 02/18/2016 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES CONTROL SYSTEM ACCESS 7,101.00 INC SRVCS:THEATER CONTROL SYSTEM ACCESS SRVCS:THE 1,939.33 9,040.33 175495 02/18/2016 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 2/11/16 336.00 336.00 175496 02/18/2016 004498 SIEMENS INDUSTRY,INC. TRAF SGNL MAINT SRVCS:YNEZ/PALM 2,121.18 PLAZA TRAF SGNL MAINT SRVCS:SANTIAGO/FF 707.06 TRAF SGNL MAINT SRVCS:TEM PKWY/B353.53 3,181.77 175497 02/18/2016 004498 SIEMENS INDUSTRY,INC. TRAF SGNL MAI NT SRVCS:TEM 713.27 713.27 PKWY/AVENIDA 175498 02/18/2016 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1469: 296.40 PLANNING PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-0051:PLANNIf 296.40 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-0818:PLANNIf 148.20 PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX-1816:PLANNIf 148.20 889.20 175499 02/18/2016 000645 SMART&FINAL INC MISC SUPPLIES:ARTS CULTURE& 487.88 EVENTS MPSC Supplies 354.10 841.98 Page-.7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175500 02/18/2016 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JAN 2-01-202-7330:VARIOUS LS-1 78,507.73 ALLNITE JAN 2-01-202-7603:VARIOUS LS-1 ALLNIT 24,842.13 JAN 2-05-791-8807:31587 TEM PKWY LS3 9,024.46 JAN 2-02-351-5281:30875 RANCHO VISTA 4,460.93 JAN 2-31-031-2590:28301 RANCHO CAL 25.24 JAN 2-30-066-2889:30051 RANCHO VISTA 25.15 JAN 2-36-122-7820:31777 DEPORTOLA RI 25.01 JAN 2-35-421-1260:41955 4TH ST LS3 22.98 JAN 2-29-974-7899:26953 YNEZ RD LS-3 155.96 JAN 2-37-303-0485:27498 ENTERPRISE C 147.25 JAN2-36-171-5626:BUTTERFIELD/LA SEF 130.49 JAN 2-29-479-2981:31454 TEM PKWY TC- 106.58 JAN 2-31-936-3511:46488 PECHANGA PKI 51.98 JAN 2-25-350-5119:45602 REDHAWK PKV 25.93 JAN 2-27-805-3194:42051 MAIN ST 2,554.93 JAN 2-20-798-3248:42081 MAIN ST 952.70 JAN 2-10-331-2153:28816 PUJOL ST 563.13 JAN 2-29-458-7548:32000 RANCHO CAL 331.69 JAN 2-29-657-2563:42902 BUTTERFIELD: 207.67 JAN 2-36-531-7916:44205 MAIN ST PED 201.17 122,363.11 175501 02/18/2016 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FEB GEN USAGE:0141,0839,2593,9306 565.12 565.12 175502 02/18/2016 005786 SPRINT 12/20-1/19/16 BUS FUSION 120.00 120.00 M2M:POLICE 175503 02/18/2016 013734 STAAT,CHAD REIMB:CA NARCOTIC CANINE ASSOC 150.12 150.12 TRAINING 175504 02/18/2016 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN 349.14 ADVANTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES:MPSC 232.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSEUM 192.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SRVCS 132.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN 101.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK 87.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN 63.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES:THEATER 62.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN 60.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES:THEATER 37.59 CREDIT/OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN -32.24 CREDIT/OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALI -47.73 1,240.08 175505 02/18/2016 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCE ROUTINE MAINTTEMPORARY PERMIT 200.00 200.00 CONTROL FEE:NPDES Page.8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175506 02/18/2016 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:CRC 100.00 100.00 CLEANING 175507 02/18/2016 014541 STEVE'S TOWING,INC TOWING SRVCS:TEMECULA POLICE 537.50 TOWING SRVCS:TEMECULA POLICE 220.00 757.50 175508 02/18/2016 009452 STRAWN,WILLIAM R. REIMB:LIGHTING TRAINING FOR 693.00 THEATER REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THE 304.52 997.52 175509 02/18/2016 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER 3/1/16-2/28/17 AGENCY MBRSHP DUES 230.00 230.00 OF 175510 02/18/2016 009194 TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS JANADVERTISING:TEMECULA 515.52 515.52 PRESENTS 175511 02/18/2016 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CRC 15.00 15.00 CENTR 175512 02/18/2016 018457 THYCOTIC SOFTWARE,LLC Server password management sw:lnfo 4,514.00 4,514.00 Tech 175513 02/18/2016 003862 THYSSENKRUPP JAN-MAR ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS:CITY 5,049.00 5,049.00 ELEVATOR.BRNCH 37 FACS 175514 02/18/2016 016311 TIERCE,NICHOLAS JAN GRAPHIC DSGN SRVCS:THEATER 2,700.00 2,700.00 175515 02/18/2016 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:COAX 28.43 28.43 175516 02/18/2016 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC MISC SUPPLIES:SPORTS PGRM 8,169.36 MISC SUPPLI ES:SPORTS PGRM 3,580.07 11,749.43 175517 02/18/2016 010558 TRADE IN.COM INC BALANCE DUE/FURNITURE:MPSC 809.46 809.46 175518 02/18/2016 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES,INC SYSTEMADMIN CERT TRNG 2/2-4 1,500.00 S.LONG SYSTEM ADMIN CERT TRNG 2/2-4 T. RO: 1,500.00 SYSTEM ADMIN CERT TRNG 2/2-4 M.SAI 1,500.00 CREDIT/BILLING ADJ:PERMITTING&LNC -212.35 4,287.65 175519 02/18/2016 005460 US BANK TRUSTEE FEES:'06&'07 RDA BONDS 4,400.00 4,400.00 175520 02/18/2016 003141 UNITED STATES WATER WATER FITNESS INSTRUCTOR TRNG 5 1,055.00 1,055.00 FITNESS AQUATIC 175521 02/18/2016 012549 UPODIUM APPARATUS MAINTENANCE:STA 73 52.21 52.21 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 175522 02/18/2016 004261 VERIZON FEB XXX-0709 GENERAL USAGE:EOC 133.46 JAN XXX-5694 GENERAL USAGE:FIRE S1 121.10 254.56 175523 02/18/2016 004789 VERIZON FEB INTERNETSVCS:HARVESTON 129.99 CTR FEB INTERNETSVCS:SKATE PARK 39.95 FEB INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 11.22 FEB INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 11.22 192.38 175524 02/18/2016 004848 VERIZON JAN LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 3.85 3.85 175525 02/18/2016 009101 VISION ONE INC JAN SHOWARE TICKETING 1,628.30 1,628.30 SRVCS:THEATER 175526 02/18/2016 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 1/1-15 TREE MAINT 1,120.00 1,120.00 SRVCS:WINCHESTER CRK 175527 02/18/2016 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE JAN'16 MSHCP PAYMENT 1,952.00 1,952.00 COUNTY 1000905 02/05/2016 018656 HAMPTON,CAROLANN REFUND:SEC DEP:RM 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTON 1000906 02/05/2016 018657 KELSO,LIZABETH REFUND:SEC DEP:RM 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTO N 1000907 02/05/2016 018657 KELSO,LIZABETH REFUND:CREDIT FOR RM 82.00 82.00 RENTAL:HARVESTO N 1000908 02/05/2016 018658 PETRICK,NANCI REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF 112.50 112.50 CTR A/B 1000909 02/05/2016 018659 PUGH,HILAREE REFUND:LOST LIBRARY MATERIALS 17.99 17.99 RETURNED 1000910 02/05/2016 018660 ROLLINS,KAMI REFUND:BIGFOOT'S VIDEO GAME 80.00 80.00 CREATOR 1000911 02/05/2016 018661 ROMERO,SHEREE REFUND:SOCCER SKILLS 2204.101 105.00 105.00 1000912 02/05/2016 018662 SAGMAN,BETHE REFUND:BIGFOOT'SART&PIZZA 15.00 15.00 PARTY 1000913 02/05/2016 018663 STUTLER,ED REFUND:TEM ROD RUN CAR ENTRY 35.00 35.00 1000914 02/05/2016 018664 WHITE,LACY REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1000915 02/12/2016 018666 CLEMENS,KIM REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF 150.00 150.00 CTR A/B 1000916 02/12/2016 018667 GILMER,MARIA REFUND:LOST LIBRARY MATERIALS 16.99 16.99 RETURNED 1000917 02/12/2016 018668 GRAUF,CYNTHIA REFUND:HEALTH CARE PROVIDER 65.00 65.00 CPR 1000918 02/12/2016 018669 GURLEY,JESSICA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 1000919 02/12/2016 018670 HORVATH,AUBREY REFUND:JR SPORTS 2206.101 105.00 105.00 1000920 02/12/2016 018671 KRAMER,JESSICA REFUND:HEALTH CARE PROVIDER 65.00 65.00 CPR 1000921 02/12/2016 018672 SMITH,LIONEL REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTON Grand total for UNION BANK: 5,485,564.35 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 02/18/2016 11:19:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA 146 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 5,485,564.35 Page:12 Item No . 4 Approvals City Attorney A� Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2016 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as January 31, 2016. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of January 31, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2016 City of Temecula ,r :s Ci of Temecula, California 41000 Main Street P.O.Box 9033 Portfolio Management Temecula,CA 92590 Portfolio Summary (951)694-6430 —�� January 31, 2016 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 37,352,674.58 37,352,674.58 37,352,674.58 3675 1 1 0.182 0.185 Retention Escrow Account 600,424.05 600,424.05 600,424.05 0.59 1 1 0.000 0.000 Letter of Credit 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Local Agency Investment Funds 41,694,342.11 41,662,484.04 41,694,342.11 41.02 1 1 0.440 0.446 Federal Agency Callable Securities 14,000,000.00 14,040,840.00 14,000,000.00 13.77 1,283 1,049 1.326 1.344 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 8,000,000.00 8,038,840.00 7,993,680.00 7.86 1,419 609 1.097 1.112 Investments 101,647,441.74 101,695,263.67 101,641,121.74 100.00% 289 193 0.516 0.523 Cash Passbook/Checking 1,077,163.62 1,077,163.62 1.077.163.62 1 1 0.000 0.000 (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 102,724,605.36 102,772,427.29 102,718,285.36 289 193 0.516 0.523 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 37,310.72 260,343.43 Average Daily Balance 98,515,133.31 89,383,078.01 Effective Rate of Return 0.45% 0.49% Reporting period 01/01/2016-01/31/2016 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM1)7.3 0 Report Ver.7-35 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 1 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 122216003-2 CITY COP RE2 ASSURED GUARANTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1 1453718479 WORKERS COMP BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2015 11,203.90 11,203.90 11,203.90 0.000 0.000 1 104348008-1 01-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348006-4 01-2 RESA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348016-3 01-2 RESB2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348000-4 01-2 SPTAX2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669911-2 03-1 ACQA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-3 03-1 ACQB3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-3 03-1 RES A3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-2 03-1 RES B2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669900-4 03-1 SPTAX1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593011-2 03-2 ACQ 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593009-2 03-2 EMWD 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593007-2 03-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593016-4 03-2 LOC 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593010-2 03-2 PWADM2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593006-2 03-2 RES 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593000-3 03-2 SPTX2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727011-2 03-3 ACQ2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727002-2 03-3 BOND 2 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727007-2 03-3 CITY2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727009 03-3 EMWD 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727006-3 03-3 RES3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727000-4 03-3 SP TX 4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-2 03-4 ADMIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686005-1 03-4 PREP1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686000-1 03-4 RED1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-2 03-4 RES2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776002-2 03-6 BOND2 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776007-2 03-6 IMP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776006-2 03-6 RES2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776000-3 03-6 SP TX3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 95453510-2 88-12 BOND2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 95453518-4 88-12 GI4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 122216003-4 CITY COP RE4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 Report Ver.7.3.5 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 122216008-3 CITY COPCIP2 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 122216000-2 CITY COPLPF2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 580,043.13 580,043.13 580,043.13 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-2 RDA 06 B PRI First American Treasury 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.000 0.000 1 107886008-2 RDA 06 CIPA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001 RDA 06 PRIN First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-2 RDA 06A INT2 First American Treasury 339,918.13 339,918.13 339,918.13 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 107886018-3 RDA 06B CIP3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-2 RDA 06B INT2 First American Treasury 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.000 0.000 1 107886016-2 RDA 06B RES2 First American Treasury 202,117.03 202,117.03 202,117.03 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 107886030-2 RDA 07 CAPI2 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886027-2 RDA 07 ESC2 First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886020-2 RDA 07 INT2 First American Treasury 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-2 RDA 07 PRINC First American Treasury 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.000 0.000 1 107886028-2 RDA 07 PROJ2 First American Treasury 209,703.10 209,703.10 209,703.10 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 107886026-2 RDA 07 RES2 First American Treasury 1,104,092.37 1,104,092.37 1,104,092.37 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343006 RDA 10 RSRV1 First American Treasury 1,263,964.46 1,263,964.46 1,263,964.46 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343008 RDA 10A Cl P2 First American Treasury 19,952.91 19,952.91 19,952.91 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343001-2 RDA 10A-INT1 First American Treasury 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 5,187,260.92 5,187,260.92 5,187,260.92 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343000-1 RDA 1013-INT1 First American Treasury 642,743.02 642,743.02 642,743.02 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94432360-2 TCSD COP INT First American Treasury 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348006-5 01-2 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 440,480.70 440,480.70 440,480.70 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 104348016-5 01-2 RES1311 Federated Tax Free Obligations 188,648.68 188,648.68 188,648.68 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 104348000-5 01-2 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 27,160.04 27,160.04 27,160.04 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,754,053.37 1,754,053.37 1,754,053.37 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 144.54 144.54 144.54 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94669922-5 03-01 COI Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 147,781.26 147,781.26 147,781.26 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 26,338.88 26,338.88 26,338.88 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 164741009-5 03-03 COI Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 164741008-5 03-03 IMP Federated Tax Free Obligations 546,975.93 546,975.93 546,975.93 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 164741006-5 03-03 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 388.92 388.92 388.92 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164741000-5 03-03 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 108,740.11 108,740.11 108,740.11 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 164742009-5 03-06 COI Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776006-5 03-06 RES 11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 7,773.14 7,773.14 7,773.14 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 786776000-5 03-06SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669902-5 03-1 bond id Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593011-5 03-2 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 221,326.64 221,326.64 221,326.64 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 793593009-5 03-2 EMWD11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,098.21 1,098.21 1,098.21 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 793593016-5 03-2 LOC11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 142,063.78 142,063.78 142,063.78 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 793593010-5 03-2 PWADM11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 793593006-5 03-2 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 793593000-5 03-2 SPTX Federated Tax Free Obligations 19.33 19.33 19.33 0.000 0.000 1 793593007-5 03-2-IMPR11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,144.89 1,144.89 1,144.89 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 744727006-5 03-3 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 744727011-5 03-3ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 507.61 507.61 507.61 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686000-5 03-4 RED11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 10,305.59 10,305.59 10,305.59 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 65,513.85 65,513.85 65,513.85 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 744727000-5 03-SSPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 146161000-5 146161000-5 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 542,675.81 542,675.81 542,675.81 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161001-5 146161001-5 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.000 0.000 1 146161008-5 RDA 11ACIP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 7,273,507.01 7,273,507.01 7,273,507.01 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161009-5 RDA 11ACOI11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 146161006-5 RDA 11RSRV11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,308,168.81 1,308,168.81 1,308,168.81 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94432363 02001 Financial Security Assurance 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593011-1 03-2-1 ACQUI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11,459,950.48 11,459,950.48 11,459,950.48 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 793593009-1 03-2-1 EMWD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 793593007-1 03-2-1 IMPRO CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 793593010-1 03-2-1 PW AD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 793593006-3 03-2-3 RESER CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,516,904.10 3,516,904.10 3,516,904.10 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 122216008 CITY COP CIP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 122216003-1 CITY COP RE1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886008-1 RDA 06 CIP-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886018-2 RDA 06 CIP-2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 107886030-1 RDA 07 CAP-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886027-1 RDA 07 ESC-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 107886006 RDA 06 RES A MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434166 RDA TABs RES MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669905-0 03-01 REF USBANK 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727099-0 03-03 REF USBANK 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776099-0 03-06 REF USBANK 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYS95453516-1 95453516-1 USBANK 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 35,499,433.65 37,352,674.58 37,352,674.58 37,352,674.58 0.182 0.185 1 Retention Escrow Account 194012308-16 RJ NOBLE Bank of Sacramento 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 ARMY CORPS Army Corps Union Bank 600,424.05 600,424.05 600,424.05 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPI aza Prtnr PI aza Prtnr Wells Fargo Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 PORTOLA TRRC Portola Trrc Wells Fargo Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 39211000 Summerhouse Wells Fargo Bank 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 600,414.15 600,424.05 600,424.05 600,424.05 0.000 0.000 1 Letter of Credit 104348006-1 02008 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2015 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Local Agency Investment Funds 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 771,550.16 771,550.16 771,550.16 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 308,620.06 308,620.06 308,620.06 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 744727007-1 03-3 CITY 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 786776007-1 03-6 IMP 1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,430,141.36 1,430,141.36 1,430,141.36 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 6,733,017.32 6,727,543.13 6,733,017.32 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,755.57 1,754.14 1,755.57 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 SYSRDA 10 DS 2 RDA 10 DS 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 5 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds SYSRDA 10A CIP1 RDA 10A CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 32,449,257.64 32,422,875.19 32,449,257.64 0.446 0.440 0.446 1 Subtotal and Average 31,981,649.56 41,694,342.11 41,662,484.04 41,694,342.11 0.440 0.446 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 313OA3RY2 01201 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/30/2014 1,000,000.00 1,004,860.00 1,000,000.00 1.150 1.130 1.146 697 12/29/2017 313OA4G89 01207 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/24/2015 1,000,000.00 1,008,640.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 1,331 09/24/2019 313OA6BY2 01212 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/26/2015 1,000,000.00 1,002,570.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 1,059 12/26/2018 313OA6YN1 01215 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/27/2016 1,000,000.00 1,005,520.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 1,456 01/27/2020 3134G5JJ5 01198 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 09/29/2014 1,000,000.00 1,003,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 606 09/29/2017 3134G6Z97 01209 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/27/2015 1,000,000.00 1,000,310.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.230 1.247 938 08/27/2018 3134G67C1 01210 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 06/22/2015 1,000,000.00 1,000,300.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.184 1.200 872 06/22/2018 3136G2CE5 01203 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/30/2015 1,000,000.00 1,005,760.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 1,094 01/30/2019 3136G2D87 01204 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/13/2015 1,000,000.00 1,001,540.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 743 02/13/2018 3136G2EC7 01205 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 999,740.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 1,122 02/27/2019 3136G2JY4 01208 Federal National Mtg Assn 05/27/2015 1,000,000.00 1,002,510.00 1,000,000.00 1.375 1.356 1.375 1,060 12/27/2018 3136G2UA3 01213 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/30/2015 1,000,000.00 1,001,190.00 1,000,000.00 1.350 1.332 1.350 1,033 11/30/2018 3136G2UN5 01214 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/30/2015 1,000,000.00 1,003,110.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 1,214 05/30/2019 3136G2WTO 01216 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/27/2016 1,000,000.00 1,000,950.00 1,000,000.00 1.450 1.430 1.450 1,456 01/27/2020 Subtotal and Average 12,322,580.65 14,000,000.00 14,040,840.00 14,000,000.00 1.326 1.344 1,049 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331KE55 01175 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/06/2011 1,000,000.00 1,007,250.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 248 10/06/2016 3133EDNDO 01196 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/11/2014 1,000,000.00 1,007,160.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.179 1.195 710 01/11/2018 3133EEHU7 01202 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/14/2015 1,000,000.00 1,008,250.00 1,000,000.00 1.410 1.391 1.410 1,078 01/14/2019 313378QH7 01189 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/28/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,820.00 1,000,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 56 03/28/2016 313381DZ5 01193 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/28/2012 1,000,000.00 1,001,030.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 0.550 330 12/27/2016 313OA4AJ1 01206 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 1,003,240.00 1,000,000.00 1.140 1.124 1.140 757 02/27/2018 313OA5MH9 01211 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/26/2015 1,000,000.00 1,009,850.00 1,000,000.00 1.360 1.341 1.360 1,059 12/26/2018 3135GOPQO 01194 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/26/2013 1,000,000.00 1,001,240.00 993,680.00 0.875 1.026 1.040 633 10/26/2017 Subtotal and Average 8,574,325.16 8,000,000.00 8,038,840.00 7,993,680.00 1.097 1.112 609 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 6 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Total and Average 98,515,133.31 101,647,441.74 101,695,263.67 101,641,121.74 0.516 0.523 193 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Page 7 Portfolio Details - Cash January 31, 2016 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Retention Escrow Account 23303800 PCL CONST Wells Fargo Bank 07/01/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Passbook/Checking Accounts SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2015 3,110.00 3,110.00 3,110.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 1,064,919.12 1,064,919.12 1,064,919.12 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING Cl TA Union Bank of California 07/01/2015 9,134.50 9,134.50 9,134.50 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 1 Total Cash and Investments 98,515,133.31 102,724,605.36 102,772,427.29 102,718,285.36 0.516 0.523 193 Portfolio TEME CP Run Date:02/26/2016-10:41 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEM ECU LA Through January 2016 Fund# Fund Name Beainnina Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 19,513,908.25 $ 7,634,746.66 $ 5,353,934.00 $ 21,794,720.91 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 838.10 0.24 837.86 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,272,456.71 15,009.82 154,456.18 5,133,010.35 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION&GOVERNMENT 18,655.01 1.56 5.27 18,651.30 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 38,095.50 5,021.57 28,908.44 14,208.63 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 215,892.83 8,187.29 63.29 224,016.83 150 AB 2766 FUND 594,101.51 943.00 1,872.48 593,172.03 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES - 16,671.38 4.71 16,666.67 161 LARRY ROBINSON REWARD 25,267.53 42.91 7.15 25,303.29 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 228,689.20 142,378.70 38,604.07 332,463.83 170 MEASURE A FUND 4,416,924.73 200,360.49 66,495.08 4,550,790.14 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 299,452.20 2,223,411.89 798,676.86 1,724,187.23 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"B"STREET LIGHTS - 319,946.72 80,334.61 239,612.11 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"D"REFUSE/RECYCLING 169,071.69 3,729,598.09 7,519.36 3,891,150.42 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"R"STREET/ROAD MAINT 19,793.14 2,502.45 6.30 22,289.29 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"L"LAKE PARK MAINT. 202,588.19 122,740.45 20,014.98 305,313.66 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 396,501.14 11,191.21 162,103.94 245,588.41 198 PUBLIC ART 24,887.74 173.09 24,764.77 296.06 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 12,416,304.07 191,361.54 763,141.76 11,844,523.85 273 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,754,183.07 14.84 - 1,754,197.91 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 546,971.10 4.83 - 546,975.93 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 11,841,816.99 10,820.22 630.60 11,852,006.61 300 INSURANCE FUND 155,714.85 97,431.24 25,143.79 228,002.30 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 322,320.38 10,397.18 12,689.17 320,028.39 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,563,410.68 41,270.23 28,647.40 1,576,033.51 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - 703,398.80 129,102.27 574,296.53 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 222,220.15 49,331.74 11,373.50 260,178.39 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 341,285.61 122,982.74 29,967.86 434,300.49 340 FACILITIES 240,590.83 310,686.63 90,400.58 460,876.88 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 16,613,847.01 5,080,083.36 2,974,591.37 18,719,339.00 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST (659,633.90) 3,073,210.87 2,072,385.01 341,191.96 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 88,814.51 150.84 25.13 88,940.22 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 739,887.62 561,432.44 1,907.46 1,299,412.60 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,088,865.11 463,592.81 1,896.66 1,550,561.26 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 81,057.10 56,929.40 1,244.09 136,742.41 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,954,687.01 967,690.63 2,115.92 2,920,261.72 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 338,917.81 166,162.52 1,778.57 503,301.76 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,966,960.64 1,928,437.43 5,871.71 6,889,526.36 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD - 18,943.20 2,583.23 16,359.97 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 49,553.83 21,707.80 1,856.98 69,404.65 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS - 24,381.86 1,995.46 22,386.40 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 557.60 3,265.48 362.86 3,460.22 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES - 19,912.68 2,209.27 17,703.41 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 18,383.58 12,524.15 976.66 29,931.07 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW - 8,380.81 1,147.65 7,233.16 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE - 71,258.59 6,459.98 64,798.61 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 18,079.40 2,545.80 158.38 20,466.82 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 3,422.74 4,890.02 495.51 7,817.25 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 1,207.00 1,004.29 119.29 2,092.00 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 10,616.32 49,398.44 4,615.13 55,399.63 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 705.62 17,410.50 1,865.79 16,250.33 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES - 7,592.71 1,384.51 6,208.20 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES - 4,661.47 810.46 3,851.01 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 50,967.31 19,659.51 1,005.13 69,621.69 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 348.36 956.13 146.22 1,158.27 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS - 49,219.59 6,019.61 43,199.98 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 68,494.43 28,815.70 5,643.73 91,666.40 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 52,869.70 90,536.32 11,117.88 132,288.14 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 46,087.10 115,423.64 15,942.64 145,568.10 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE - 2,117.49 267.02 1,850.47 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 9,292.42 3,891.76 377.62 12,806.56 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON - 83,658.70 13,999.31 69,659.39 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 35,029.05 21,856.27 2,210.22 54,675.10 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1,210.89 949.14 88.03 2,072.00 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 2,153.38 4,513.14 370.87 6,295.65 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 222,589.02 118,129.59 10,856.48 329,862.13 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT - 1,732.45 136.09 1,596.36 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 33,719.49 57.27 9.54 33,767.22 Grand Total: $ 86,679,793.25 $29,078,550.17 $12,985,916.13 $102,772,427.29 Journal Entries completed atter December's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts/Disbursements columns. Item No . 5 Approvals �- City Attorney 11 Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Buxton Company dba: Buxton for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment Report and Visitor Analysis PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Appropriate $10,000 from undesignated fund balance to the Economic Development Department's operating budget to cover the scope of work to be completed this fiscal year. 2. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Buxton Company dba: Buxton, in the amount of $50,000, for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment and Visitor Analysis Report for Fiscal Year 2016-17. BACKGROUND: On March 10, 2015, the City of Temecula entered into an Agreement with Buxton in the amount of $40,000 for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment Report. The report developed a list of the top 10 retailers not present within the City that best match our Community Profile. Buxton utilizes information included in over 250 consumer and business databases to develop a Community Profile that goes beyond income, race and age demographics, but rather dives into consumer proximity, demand, economic level and buying habits. In order to strategically recruit retailers, pertinent customer profile information is needed to discover the full potential of our retail market, and to seize new retail opportunities. Last year's report was utilized as a key retailer recruiting tool by City's Economic Development team during the International Council of Shopping Center (ICSC) Global Retail Real Estate Convention (RECon). Additionally, they compared Temecula's Community Profile with the characteristics sought by Temecula's Top 10 most wanted retailers, which allowed the ED to make strategic decisions on the level effort needed to successfully recruit these desired businesses. The proposed amendment to the original agreement includes a $40,000 component that will extend the City's partnership with Buxton and will provide the City with a refined custom targeted retail assessment that will be used for attraction of the citizen's "most wanted" retailers that currently do not have a presence in Temecula. Buxton will also supplement the previously prepared list of 10 retailers that best fit the Temecula Community Profile not in our area with 10 additional quality retail matches. This amended report will be utilized in identifying potential developers for our retail and restaurant market place at this year's ICSC RECon in late May. Buxton will also provide continued access to sophisticated demographic data which can be utilized when meeting with and recruiting other than retail end users including higher education institutions. Buxton's services also include assembling individualized marketing packages for the ten targeted retailers, including notification to the retailer that Buxton has confirmed the potential viability for the City, as well as supplying appropriate retailer contact information. Additionally, as an optional $10,000 service Buxton will provide the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (TVCVB) a Visitor and Tourism Attraction Marketing Study to be funded by the TVCVB. This study will include a hotel visitor profile that will provide insight into more than 7,500 categories of lifestyles, purchase behaviors, and media reading and viewing habits of the City's hotel visitors. The report will also summarize hotel visitor origins to aid in directing marketing tourism activities. FISCAL IMPACT: With the requested appropriation, there will be sufficient funding for Fiscal Year 2015-2016; sufficient funding will be programmed in the Economic Development operating budget for the $30,000 balance of the scope of work. The $10,000 optional services will only be initiated upon remittance of the $10,000 fee by TVCVB. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND BUXTON COMPANY RETAIL ATTRACTION MARKETING STUDY AND VISITOR ANALYSIS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 8, 2016, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Buxton Company, a Texas Corporation (dba: Buxton) (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On March 10, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Retail Attraction Marketing Study," in the amount of $40,000.00. b. The parties now desire to add scope of work, extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2017, increase the payment in the amount of $40,000.00 for the Economic Development Retail Recruitment, and $10,000.00 for a Visitor Analysis to be paid through the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (TVCVB), which is optional and will only be initiated upon remittance of the $10,000.00 fee by TVCVB, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1. of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2017 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4. of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The FIRST Amendment amount shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($40,000.00), of which Ten Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($10,000.00) to be funded by City upon execution of the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2015-16 and Thirty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($30,000.00) to be funded by the City in Fiscal Year 2016-17 for an Economic Development Retail Recruitment Report; and Ten Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($10,000.00) to be funded by the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau for Visitor Analysis Studies in Fiscal Year 2016-17 for additional Retail, Visitor and Attraction Marketing for a total First Amendment amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($50,000.00) and for a total 1 Agreement amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($90,000.00). 4. Exhibit "A and B" to the Agreement are hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BUXTON COMPANY (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor David Glover, Chief Financial Officer ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk Cody Howell, Vice President & General Manager CID APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Buxton Company 2651 S. Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 817.332.3681 Lisa Hill McCay Lhill-mccay@buxtonco.com PM Initials: C*P Date: 2 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT A The Buxton Company will develop a retail attraction marketing study for the City of Temecula to include: 1. Sixteen Month Contract Amendment— March 8, 2016 to June 30, 2017. 2. Scope includes: - Profile Temecula Trade Area's Residential Customers - Retails Site Assessment - Define and Evaluate Temecula Trade Area and Drive Time Analysis - Provide a Top 10 list of current retailers that match Temecula consumer profile that we currently do not have - Provide Market Packages for Temecula's Top 10 identified retailers - Two in-person visits within 12 month/agreed services - Visitor Analysis Study (Optional) 3 EXHIBIT B Amendment One: The amount shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($40,000.00), of which Ten Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($10,000.00) to be funded by City upon execution of the Agreement in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and Thirty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($30,000.00) to be funded in Fiscal Year 2016-17; and Ten Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($10,000.00) to be funded by the Temecula Convention and Visitors Bureau in Fiscal Year 2016-17 for additional Retail and Visitor Attraction Marketing Studies for a total First Amendment amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($50,000.00) and for a total Agreement amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($90,000.00). Payment will be invoiced to City upon execution of Agreement for the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($10,000.00) in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and the balance of Thirty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($30,0000.00) on July 1, 2016. Payment will be invoiced to the Temecula Visitors and Convention Bureau in the amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) upon completion of work in Fiscal Year 2016-17. 4 Proposal RETAIL RECRUITMENT SOLUTION 1- o Prepared by: Cheyenne Robinson ' `'4L Expiration: March 30, 2016 Bu . . n, OUR VALUE PROPOSITION Since our founding in 1994, Buxton©has been a leading force in retail site and development. We are recognized for creating solutions that provide results. Buxton began as a service to help retailers make informed site selection decisions by understanding their customers and precisely determining their markets. Buxton soon realized that the company's expertise in retail site and market analysis could also be leveraged to benefit communities desiring retail expansion. BUXTON'S AWARDS & HONORS 'NRF RETAIL FRSMMMYA Of The YeEY ar Nan,ed to`The Lis-of People Most Innwvanve C'Stomer Se—ce Shap,ng Retail"s Fut—na' Cornpany of the Yeas 42 on the Fast 50 Deowlmen;of-he Year More than simply providing data, Buxton supplies custom marketing materials and strategies targeting the unique site requirements of retailers, developers, and commercial real estate brokers. Buxton clients achieve outstanding success using our tools for retail identification, selection, and recruitment. Clients benefit from Buxton's unique understanding of site selection from the retailer's point of view. • Grow Your Community. Create new, permanent jobs that will satisfy your citizens desire to shop at home; retain dollars currently spent outside of your community and maximize revenue growth to fund city services • Leverage Buxton's Retail Industry Expertise. Establish credibility with decision makers by providing factual evidence to support your site and gain a competitive position by leveraging our experience: • 3500+ total clients from the retail, restaurant, healthcare, and public sector industries • 700+ public sector clients nationwide • 35+ million square feet of retail space • 500+ cumulative years of retail management and economic development experience • Access Your Buxton Solution with Ease. Utilize your best-in-class retail recruitment solution via SCOUTTm with the touch of a button from any mobile device; gain answers to your retail recruitment and site analysis questions and have the big picture in the palm of your hand • Develop a Long-Term Partnership. Receive personal guidance and ongoing insight into key industry topics Buy-ms on South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON vvww.buxtonco.com i. an SCOPE OF SERVICES Buxton is pleased to present this proposal to Temecula, CA. The purpose of this proposal is to outline and review your community development objectives and how Buxton's solutions will enhance your ability to effectively meet those objectives. Temecula, CA's Objectives: 1. Recruit new retailers and restaurants 2. Retain existing retailers and restaurants 3. Understand current retail and restaurant economic condition Retail Recruitment and Retention Solution: Your Community Profile Our solution is a total marketing strategy that enables community leaders to understand the consumer profile of their residents and to identify specific retailers and restaurants who seek a market with household purchasing habits just like yours. This solution provides you with the ability to actively pursue identified retailers, making a compelling case for their expansion to Temecula, CA by utilizing custom marketing packages that Buxton will create for you. You will have access to the same analytical information and insights retailers depend on today to make site selection decisions.This knowledge will provide you with instant credibility and the ability to differentiate your community. Step 1 -Research Your Community Buxton uses over 250 consumer and business databases that are updated regularly and compares your potential sites to the universe of all competing sites operating in the U.S. We define your current retail situation and those in any neighboring communities that impact your retail environment. Step 2- Define and Evaluate Your Trade Area Customers shop by convenience, measuring distance based on time, not mileage. We will conduct a custom drive-time analysis to determine your trade area using our proprietary methodology and knowledge of individual retail clients' actual trade areas. Your drive-time trade area will be provided to you as a map that accurately depicts your consumer shopping patterns. Step 3- Profile Your Trade Area's Residential Customers Your community profile will analyze every household in your drive-time trade area. Based on more than 7,500 categories of lifestyles, purchase behaviors, and media reading and viewing habits (psychographics), the households in your trade area are assessed to gain an understanding of the types of retailers that would be attracted to your site. Step 4-We Match Retailers and Restaurants to Market Potential Buxton will match the consumer profile of your community's trade area against the customer profiles of 5,000+ retailers in our proprietary database. We will identify the similarity between the two profiles analyzed using Buxton's proprietary retail matching algorithm to determine if your site presents an attractive opportunity for each retailer. We then qualify the list of matched results to verify that a retailer is currently operating or expanding, that they operate in similar sites, and that your site affords adequate buffer from competition and cannibalization to be realistically considered. 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON 1 www.buxtonco.com Btraon Step 5-We Create Marketing Packages Buxton will assemble individualized marketing packages for up to ten (10) targeted retailers for one site. We will notify each retailer's key real estate decision maker by letter, informing them that they have been qualified by Buxton as a potential viable fit for your site and should expect to be contacted by a representative of the city. Your marketing packages will be delivered to you in SCOUT and include a: 1. Map of the retail site and trade area 2. Map of the retailer's potential customers 3. Retailer match report that compares the site's trade area characteristics and consumer profile with the retailer's sites in similar trade areas Solution Deliverables: • SCOUT Touch access • Drive time trade area maps • Retail site assessment • Retailer specific marketing packages (for up to ten (10) retailers) 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON www.buxtonco.com Btr,con Access and Use Your Retail Recruitment Solution via SCOUT Touch Buxton's Retail Recruitment solution will allow you to actively recruit retailers to your community and support existing businesses with the push of a button in SCOUT Touch, providing you with crucial information about your community, your trade areas, your residents, and much more. SCOUT is a web-based platform that is accessible on any Windows or iOS enabled device with an Internet connection. It is designed to give decision-makers in your community access to the data and solutions that will assist them in making better business decisions. Four (4) SCOUT users will have the ability to run demographic and trade area profile reports, and view maps and other data elements. Identifying and quantifying key variables that impact your community, you will acquire insights from these findings that will provide you with a strong understanding of the visitors to your community, as well as retail recruitment and business retention efforts. In Buxton's SCOUT Touch you will be able to: • Identify retail matches • See aerial view • Run variable reports • View physician intelligence • View city limit maps 0 Run comparable reports • Run healthcare reports 0 Run retail leakage/surplus reports • Run demographic & consumer propensity reports • i • -at • • r r r _• i r r 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON 1 www.buxtonco.com Btraon SUPPORT In-Person Visits Buxton will provide Temecula with up to two (2) in-person visits in which to conduct community updates, round table discussions to the public, city council, or Temecula Economic Development Team, or another form of meeting. Meeting purposes and times/dates will be decided between the client and Buxton. SCOUT Technical Requirements SCOUT can be accessed at the following URL: www.buxtonco.com SCOUT is a web-based platform accessible on any desktop, laptop, or mobile tablet device that has an Internet connection. An iPad Air 2 is suggested by Buxton to give you the best user experience. Android tablets are not supported by Buxton's Helpdesk. Minimum browser requirements are Internet Explorer 10, Safari 5, Chrome 21, or Firefox 14. Buxton's Helpdesk (1-817-332-3681) is available during normal office hours (8:00 AM-5:30 PM CST, excluding weekends and public holidays). Buxton's Helpdesk team will be available to support all educational,functional, and technical inquiries and will respond to all requests within twenty- four (24) hours of submission. •n's Helpdesk L--- - . _ 11 Monday - •• - Monday-Friday: 8:00 am-5:30 pm CST i -o i 7-332-: uu i 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON I www.buxtonco.com Bwaon PROJECT TIMELINE • Acquire retail location areas from Temecula, CA Within ten (10) •SCOUT access • Research and verify Temecula, CA's retail trade area • Define drive-time trade areas • Evaluate Temecula, CA's retail potential • Analyze retail leakage/surplus • Examine local business retention and expansion • Determine customer profile •Assess retail sites • Determine matching retailers and restaurants market potential • Deliver marketing packages and begin .. communication with retailers s • • 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON www.buxtonco.com Btraon TERM, FEES, AND DELIVERY Agreement Term One (1) Year Fee ($10,000 to be invoiced upon execution of agreement; $40,000 $30,000 to be invoiced on July 1,2016) Delivery Temecula, CA will have access to retail match lists and marketing packages within sixty(60) business days of execution. Your SCOUT access will be enabled within ten (10) business days of the execution of this agreement.Temecula,CA will have access to retail match lists and marketing packages within sixty(60) business days of execution.It is mutually agreed by the parties that the term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and terminate in one year.All service fees associated with this agreement are due in net (10) days of the date of the invoice.Execution of this agreement will act as full consent that Buxton may include Temecula,CA on its client list and in presentations and public relations efforts.When doing so,Buxton will not reveal information that is confidential and proprietary to Temecula,CA. Buxton Temecula, CA Signature Signature Printed Name Printed Name Title Date Title Date Please provide us with a primary point of contact Please provide us with a primary point of for invoice receipt. contact. Name: Name: Phone: Phone: Email: Email: Preferred Method of Receipt: Email OR U.S.Mail 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON www.buxtonco.com Btraon Optional/Temecula Valley Visitors Bureau Visitor Insights -$10,000 Buxton can develop a hotel visitor profile by analyzing all Visa expenditures for a recent twelve (12) month period where the cardholder's originating address is located outside the designated regions. Expenditures are consolidated at the ZIP+4 level so as to de-identify individual cardholder information and respect card-holder privacy laws while still providing Buxton with a way to develop an accurate visitor profile of the visitors to Temecula.This solution will provide you with insights into more than 7,500 categories of lifestyles, purchase behaviors, and media reading and viewing habits of your hotel visitors. Next Page: Project Schedule 2651 South Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 1-888-2BUXTON www.buxfonco.com Bw,,con Item No . 6 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with His Venture for the 2016 Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair (At the Recommendation of the Economic Development Committee Mayor Pro-Tem Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Recreation Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with His Venture for city-support costs, in the amount of $5,600 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2016 Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair. BACKGROUND: Staff received a sponsorship request from His Venture to provide city-support costs for the 2016 Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair to be held on April 23, 2016. The Economic Development Committee of the City Council (Then-Mayor Comerchero and Council Member Edwards) met on April 7, 2015, to review the budget on this first time special event and recommended support at the levels indicated in the staff report if the route could be arranged to minimize impact on vehicular traffic. Event organizers met with City staff and determined a route on the Business Park Drive loop with minimal impact to traffic flow in that area. Event organizers were then tasked with collecting signatures from all impacted businesses in and around the event area. This task has been completed and planning is well underway. Old Town Temecula Grand Prix and Health Fair is a cycling criterium/ bike race associated with the National Criterium Circuit of USA Cycling. The bike race will consist of ten race categories including a free kids race with heats running from 7:OOam-4:OOpm. There will also be a "Learn to Live to 100" Health Fair. Multiple vendors will be on-site to provide knowledge and tools to assist you with your committment to a healthy lifestyle plan. All proceeds from the event will benefit Cast a Shadow, a branch of His Venture. Cast a Shadow is a local, non-profit that reaches into lives both on and off the bike. They take the opportunity to create events where passionate cyclists can participate and ride with a purpose. Through donations raised they have built orphanages, provided water filtration systems for families and most recently provided an adaptive bicycle to a local school for kids with physical challenges. FISCAL IMPACT: The City-support costs of $5,600 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Operating Budget of the various supporting departments. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND HIS VENTURE THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 8t" day of March, 2016, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and His Venture, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit'). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair (hereinafter referred to as the "Event') on April 23, 2016. The Event is a special event which is located in Temecula on the Business Park Drive loop. b. The Event includes, a cycling criterium/ bike race associated with the National Criterium Circuit of USA Cycling and a "Learn to Live to 100" Health Fair. C. Alcohol will not be served. d. The City desires to be a Co-Sponsor of the Event. e. The Event will serve as a fundraiser with Cast a Shadow, a branch of His Venture. Cast a Shadow is a local, non-profit that reaches into lives both on and off the bike. They take the opportunity to create events where passionate cyclists can participate and ride with a purpose. Through donations raised they have built orphanages, provided water filtration systems for families and most recently provided an adaptive bicycle to a local school for kids with physical challenges. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 8, 2016, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2016, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city-support services valued at an amount not to exceed Five Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($5,600.00) and in- kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415.00), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co-Sponsor of the Event. As a Co-Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co-Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file an application for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit or any other City- issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 6. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre-event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 7. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 8. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by April 1, 2016, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non- owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 9. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 12. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Recipient: His Venture Attn: Henry Szczypiorski Jr. PO Box 2050 Temecula, CA 92593 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non- substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non- monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA HIS VENTURE (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Monty Sharp, Director of Student Venture ATTEST: By: By: Rand! Johl, City Clerk Henry Szczypiorski Jr., Director of Cast a Shadow APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney NONPROFIT His Venture Attn: Henry Szczyplorski Jr. PO Box 2050 Temecula, CA 92593 909 648-8471 _iayromeski@me.com Ini#ialsl Da Date: (C'! EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA'S SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR His Venture shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers • City of Temecula logo/name on event t-shirt • Five (5) Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair t-shirts "Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $ 1,100.00 Fire: $ 1,000.00 Public Works: $ 2,500.00 Community Services_ $ 1,000.00 TOTAL: $ Qlp ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Old Town Grand Prix and Health Fair is as follows: Item Value Auto Mall Marque $ 3,115.00 Appears approximately once every 4 %minutes Cable Channel $ 5,100.00 Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds City Website $ 2,200.00 Event listing on the City of Temecula's event calendar Promotional Poster 42X66 poster located in the concourse at the Civic Center TOTAL VALUE: $ 11.415.00 Item No . 7 Approvals �- City Attorney 11 Finance Director City Manager bol CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Truax Development for the Potential Disposition of Property Located on Main Street in the City of Temecula (APNs 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007) PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) between the City of Temecula and Truax Development (Truax)for the potential disposition and development of the property located on Main Street in the City of Temecula (APNs 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007) (Subject Property). BACKGROUND: The Subject Property, also known as the Town Square Marketplace (TSMP), is considered the third and final phase of the overall Civic Center development. The Subject Property consists of the vacant pads flanking the Town Square Park to the north and south, and is generally envisioned as a commercial mixed-use development that will complement the Civic Center and Town Square Park. In 2007, the City engaged in a competitive selection process to partner with a preferred developer to design and construct the project. The competitive process resulted in the selection of Pelican Properties as the preferred developer. Because of the economic downturn, Pelican Properties was not able to construct the project. The City, after a number of extensions, determined that the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement should be allowed to expire and once economic conditions improved, the City would revisit the process of selecting a preferred developer. In March 2014, staff met with the Civic Center Subcommittee, then consisting of Council Members Comerchero and Roberts,to discuss and receive direction on the future development of the TSMP. On March 11, 2014, at the direction of the Subcommittee, the City issued a Request for Interest (RFI)to solicit interest from qualified firms for the development of the TSMP. Four firms responded to the RFI and, after an initial review, the Subcommittee recommended that three of the applicants move on to be interviewed, and conducted those interviews on August 14, 2014,the Subcommittee.After thorough and productive interviews the Subcommittee unanimously chose Truax Development as the preferred candidate to enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement In order to facilitate the proposed project and negotiate the terms of a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA), the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Truax Development on January 13, 2015. The ENA provides both the City and Truax Development a specified timeframe and negotiating framework in which a DDA could be developed. The DDA will determine the specific nature of the development, construction milestones, and other requirements and conditions necessary for the City to relinquish ownership of the Subject Property. Both the City and Truax Development have been negotiating in good faith since the approval of the ENA. The Subject Property is currently owned by the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) and is required to be transferred to the City via the California State Department of Finance approved Long Range Property Management Plan. The administrative and legal complexities of this process, along with other site design issues, have caused the negotiating period to be prolonged beyond the initial term. The City and Truax Development again propose to amend the ENA to extend the term. The proposed Amendment to the ENA includes the following terms: • Six month term beginning March 8, 2016 • One administrative extension of 90 days The Exclusive Negotiating Agreement is the first step in the development of this project. The ENA does not commit the City to sell or lease the property. FISCAL IMPACT: Ultimately, if a Disposition and Development Agreement is approved, the Subject Property will be sold to Truax Development. The proceeds from the sale will be divided proportionally amongst taxing entities, including the City, respective to their share of property tax. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Second Amendment Exclusive Negotiating Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (this "Amendment")is dated as of March , 2016, and is entered into by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation (the "City") and TRUAX DEVELOPMENT (the "Developer"). RECITALS A. The City and Developer entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement dated January 13, 2015 and amended it by a First Amendment to Exclusive Negotiating Agreement dated June 9, 2015 ("ENA")to negotiate on an exclusive basis to establish the terms and conditions of a"disposition and development agreement" ("DDA")that would result in the sale of land described in the ENA by City to Developer with the understanding that the City shall be under no obligation to reach agreement on the terms thereof with Developer. B. The ENA expires on March 8, 2016, but Developer and the City desire to extend the term of the ENA. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The ENA Period (as such term is used in the ENA) is hereby extended to September 8, 2016. If a DDA has not been signed and approved within the ENA Period and the Developer and the City are using good faith efforts to negotiate diligently, then such ENA Period may be extended further in writing by the City Manager for up to two (2)periods of thirty (30) days each to enable the Developer and the City to (1) determine whether each desires to enter into a DDA, (2) hold any public hearings required by laws and take the action necessary to authorize the City to approve the DDA and (3) sign the DDA. 2. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other agreements or understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof or any related subject and no representations by either party to the other have been made as an inducement to enter into this Amendment. All prior negotiations between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof are superseded by this Amendment. 3. This Amendment may not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing executed by all parties. 4. If any party should bring any legal action or proceeding relating to this Amendment or to enforce any provision hereof, or if the parties agree to arbitration or mediation relating to this Amendment, the party in whose favor a judgment or decision is rendered shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses from the other. The parties agree that any legal action or proceeding or agreed-upon arbitration or mediation shall be filed in and shall occur in the County of Riverside. -I- 5. The interpretation and enforcement of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 6. Time is of the essence of each and every provision hereof. 7. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above. DEVELOPER: TRUAX DEVELOPMENT, a By: Print Name: Title: CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney -2- Item No . 8 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract to DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. for the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation, PW12-14 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Jon Salazar, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc., in the amount of $794,286.50, for the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation, PW12-14; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $158,857.30, which is equal to 20% of the Contract amount; 3. Make a finding that the Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)fees. BACKGROUND: On September 25, 2012, the City Council awarded an Agreement for consultant services for the preparation of plans and specifications to rehabilitate various sections of roadway throughout the City, including Old Town Front Street between Temecula Parkway and First Street. On July 16, 2013, an amendment to the Agreement was approved by the City Manager to incorporate the design of storm drain work into the design of the pavement rehabilitation work for this segment of Old Town Front Street. On July 28, 2015, the City Council approved the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorized staff to solicit construction bids. On September 10, 2015, five bids were electronically opened and publicly posted on the City's online bidding service PlanetBids. Due to the apparent low bidder's (Beador Construction, Inc.) subsequent inability to procure the bonds necessary to carry out construction of the project, staff recommended rejecting all bids from this bid opening and re-bidding the project, a recommendation that City Council approved at the January 12, 2016 meeting. On February 22, 2016, six bids were electronically opened and publicly posted on the City's online bidding service PlanetBids. The electronic bid results were as follows: No. Bidder Amount 1 PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company $663,649.00 2 DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. $794,286.50 3 Beador Construction Company, Inc. $801,300.00 4 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. $816,982.00 5 R.J. Noble Company $879,512.00 6 All American Asphalt $1,024,500.00 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals, and found PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company to be the lowest responsible bidder. After we notified PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company that they were the apparent low bidder, the company requested relief from their bid due to a mathematical error. The City has determined that PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company's request was based on legitimate grounds and they were granted relief from their bid. This resulted in DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. becoming the apparent low bidder. DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. has public contracting experience, and has completed similar projects for other public agencies in Southern California. The specifications call for a construction duration of sixty working days, which is an approximate duration of three months. The engineer's estimated cost of the project was $770,000. Due to the possibility of encountering additional distressed pavement and/or unsuitable subgrade during construction operations, staff is requesting a 20% construction contingency. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Beginning July 1, 2008, the RCA required that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within ninety days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. The Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation project involves reconstruction of an existing roadway, and storm drain work on fully developed land and, therefore, the project is exempt from MSHCP fees. FISCAL IMPACT: The Old Town Front Street Pavement and Storm Drain Rehabilitation is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2016-20, and is funded with Measure A (pavement rehab work) and General Fund Contributions (pavement rehab and storm drain work). Adequate funds are available in the project accounts to construct the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Project Descriptions 3. Project Location CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT for OLD TOWN FRONT STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. PW12-14 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 8t" day of March, 2016, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: That City and Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled OLD TOWN FRONT STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION, PROJECT NO. PW12- 14, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for OLD TOWN FRONT STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION, PROJECT NO. PW12-14. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 990 Park Center Drive, Suite E Vista, CA 92081 (760) 734-1113 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications OLD TOWN FRONT STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION, PROJECT NO. 12-14. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: OLD TOWN FRONT STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION, PROJECT NO. 12-14 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by City. 3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($794,286.50), the total amount of the base bid. Contractor agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed sixty (60) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by City. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by City. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS a. Lump Sum Bid Schedule. Before submittal of the first payment request, the Contractor shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the Contractor's payment requests. b. Unit Price Bid Schedule. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to 95% of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the Contractor filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the City on forms provided by the City. C. Payment for Work Performed. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. d. Payment of Interest. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES/ EXTENSION OF TIME. a. Liquidated Damages. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor agrees to forfeit and pay to City the sum of $1,000 per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to Contractor. b. Extension of Time. Contractor will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including delays caused by City. Within ten (10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, Contractor shall give written notice to City. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, Contractor shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to City. Contractor's failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute Contractor's waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against City. 8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the Contractor has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the City related to the payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included), and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. The Contractor shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the City for any and all costs incurred by the City as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The City shall deduct such costs from progress payments or final payments due to the Contractor. The Contractor shall defend and indemnify (including the appointment of competent defense counsel) the City from any claims, demands, legal proceedings, writs of mandate, and the like, initiated by any third parties challenging the award of this Contract to the Contractor. 12. GRATUITIES. Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to City's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Contractor warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the City who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. Contractor further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the Contractor has been employed by the City within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to City. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 18. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the Contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the City addressed as follows: Mailing and Delivery Address: Thomas W. Garcia, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR: DDH Apple Valley Construction, Inc. 9312 Deep Creek Road Apple Valley, CA 92308 (760) 247-4810 By: Douglas G. Hamilton, President By: Cheryl L. Hamilton, Secretary/Treasurer (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PM Initial: Date: ow Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2016-20 W.—C-.t y PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and reconstruction of major streets as recommended in the Pavement Management System. Benefit/Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Installations are completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works-Account No. 210.165.655 Level: Prior Years FYE 2015 2015-16 Project Cost: Actual Carryover Adopted 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration $ 1,473,958 $ 200,000 $ 270,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 2,583,958 Construction $ 10,947,919 $5,822,639 $ 507,639 $ 652,257 $ 989,600 $ 1,103,525 $ 1,224,384 $ 21,247,963 Construction Engineering $ 125,632 $ 229,127 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,004,759 Design $ 624,563 $ 97,625 $ 150,000 $ 230,000 $ 1,102,188 Totals $ 13,172,072 $6,349,391 $ 977,639 $ 1,192,257 $ 1,299,600 $ 1,413,525 $ 1,534,384 $ 25,938,868 Source of Funds: Prior Years FYE 2015 2015-16 Actual Carryover Adopted 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost General Fund Contributions $ 2,664,345 $4,319,178 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 7,983,523 Measure A $ 10,507,727 $2,030,213 $ 977,639 $ 942,257 $ 1,049,600 $ 1,163,525 $ 1,284,384 $ 17,955,345 Total Funding: $ 13,172,072 $6,349,391 $ 977,639 $ 1,192,257 $ 1,299,600 $ 1,413,525 $ 1,534,384 $ 25,938,868 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 (jeneral Fundon ri u ions include I.b million Tor Pavement ManagementProgram Approved at Midyear on . 59 / J C R.J IT Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2016-20 CITYWIDE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of storm drain improvements on several streets that flood during storm events, as well as replacing the existing cross gutter at Old Town Front Street, north of Temecula Parkway. The storm drain improvements on Old Town Front Street will be constructed in conjunction with the Pavement Rehabilitation project. Benefit I Core Value: This project improves safety and circulation while maintaining the integrity of the streets during inclement weather. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The storm drain improvements on Old Town Front Street will be constructed during FY 2015-16. Department: Public Works-Account No. 210.165.715 Level: Prior Years FYE 2015 2015-16 Project Cost: Actual Carryover Adopted 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration $ 168,622 $ 26,238 $ 25,000 $ 219,860 Acquisition $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 456,269 $ 156,927 $ 613,196 Construction Engineering $ 9,030 $ 21,704 $ 30,734 Design $ 42,261 $ 581 $ 42,842 MSHCP $ 4,368 $ 19,132 $ 23,500 Totals $ 680,550 $ 254,582 $ 55,000 $ - $ $ - $ $ 990,132 Source of Funds: Prior Years FYE 2015 2015-16 Actual Carryover Adopted 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost General un Contributions $ 680,550 $ 254,582 $ 55,000 $ 990,132 Total Funding: $ 680,550 $ 254,582 $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 990,132 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 85 THE CITY OF TEMECULA PW12-14 - Old Town Front St Pvmt & Storm Drain Rehab sq� c�R Legend 13 clty /,/ Streets $� E:] Parcels W �O Pavement Portion 0 0 t� z X00 Sto m Drain Portion 4+co 9�F �v N 0 1000 2000 3000 ft. Scale: 1:10,386 Map center: 6288915,2121692 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Item No . 9 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho California Road, PW10-12 PREPARED BY: David McBride, Senior Engineer- CIP Chris White, Assistant Engineer- CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho California Road, PW 10-12, as complete; 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the Contract amount; 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On December 9, 2014, the City Council awarded a Contract to All American Asphalt in the amount of $729,000, and authorized the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed a 10% contingency of $72,900. The project rehabilitated the pavement on Rancho California Road between Ynez Road and Jefferson Avenue / Old Town Front Street. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from November 2, 2015, the date the work was substantially complete. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 7107. The Pavement Rehabilitation Program is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2015-19, and funded from Measure A and Capital Projects Reserves. The original contract amount was $729,000. Due to the decrease in the scope of work and construction duration, the Contract amount was reduced to $553,129.64. There were three contract change orders totaling $25,220.92, which resulted in a final Contract amount of $578,350.56. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of the acceptance of the project and filing the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release 3. Maintenance Bond RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to All American Asphalt, P.O. Box 2229, Corona, California 92878-2229 to perform the following work of improvement: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PROJECT NO. PW10-12 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on March 8, 2016. That upon said contract the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900, Los Angeles, California 90017, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PROJECT NO. PW10-12 6. The location of said property is: Rancho California Road between Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, Temecula, California. Dated at Temecula, California, this 8t" day of March, 2016. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 8t" day of March, 2016. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk JCN__,Z[491II - CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM -- RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (JEFFERSON AVENUE TO YNEZ ROAD) PROJECT NO. PW10-12 This is to certify that It& �� (hereinafter the "Contractor') declares to the City ofTedi cola, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bilis contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, PROJECT NO, PW10-12, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contract Code §7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR: j Dated: ��7 By: Signature SHLEY R. NCE REDIT MANAGER Print Name and Title RELEASE R- Premium is included in the Performance Bond Executed in:2 Counterparts CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 7643082 MAINTENANCE BOND for PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (JEFFERSON AVENUE TO YNEZ ROAD) PROJECT NO. PW10-12 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT All American Asphalt-400 East Sixth Street,Corona,CA 92879 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a Corporation (hereinafter called "Principal'), and (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership,or Individual) Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland-777 S.Figueroa Street,Suite 3900,Los Angeles, CA 90017 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of Seventy Two Thousand Nine Hundred DOLLARS AND 00/100 CENTS ($$72,9 0.00 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 9th day of December,2014 , 2046;a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (JEFFERSON AVENUE TO YNEZ ROAD), PROJECT NO. PW10-12. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 2nd day of No erniber, 2016 ,le+6— NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. MAINTENANCE BOND M8-1 As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 2nd day of February 2016. ((Seal) SURETY: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland PRINCIPAL: All American Asphalt By: By: cv�f Rebecca Haas-Bates J-- (Name) (Namel Attorney-in-Fact l Cr,' VkeS D aI (Title) (Title) By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: FA, "!¢S (Na Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. MAINTENANCE BOND MB-2 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate vermes only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached.and not the truthfulness.accuracy.or validitv of that document. State of California County of Riverside On February_ 5, 2016 before me, B. Royster;Notary Pt`thlir. Date Here Insert name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Edward J. Carlson and Michael Farkas Name(s)of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the B. ROYSTER person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument Commission#t 2083832 and acknowledged to me that #e/she/they executed the same in -+ Notary Public-California n his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hi-sAier/their y Riverside Countysignature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf 4�r My Comm.Expires Oct 26,2018~ of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS1mynd and; Icial seal. Si nature IGf Place Notary Seal Above SIgnale of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Maintenance Bond—City of Temecula Document Date: February 2, 2016 Number of Pages: 4 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Rebecca Haas-Bates, Attorney-in-Fact Capacity(ies)Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Edward J. Carlson Signer's Name: Michael Farkas ❑ Individual ❑ Individual X Corporate Officer—Title(s): Vice President X Corporate Officer—Title(s): Secretary ❑ Partner ❑ ❑ Limited ❑ General _ ❑ Partner 11 ❑ Limited ❑ General RIGHTIGHTTHUMBPRINT ❑Attorney in Fact OF SIGNER ❑Attorney in Fact OF SIGNER ❑Trustee Top of thumb here ii Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Other: ❑Other: Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: All American Asphalt All American Asphalt CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE§ 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On 02/02/2016 before me, R.Paramo,Notary Public Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Rebecca Haas-Bates Namej�,),of SignerN ~ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons} whose name(4 is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/tires[ executed the same in his/herlt'tteir authorized capacity ids.),and that by ttts(her/Pleir signatureZ4 on the instrument the person(* or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is trZS. nd correct.- my han nd office I seal. R.PARAMO o Commission# 2035890 Notary Public -California Orange County ignatu M Comm, Expires Au 5 2017 Signature of Notary Public v- Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No.7643082_ Document Date: 02/02/2016 Number of Pages: Two JQ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: All American Asphalt Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Rebecca Haas-Bates Signer's Name: ❑Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑General ❑ Individual IW Attorney in Fact ❑ Individual ❑Attorney in Fact ❑Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑Other: ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland — 02014 National Notary Association - www.NationalNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY(1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New York,the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,a corporation of the State of Maryland, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Maryland (herein collectively called the "Companies"), by THOMAS O. MCCLELLAN, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By-Laws of said Companies,which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof,do hereby nominate,constitute,and appoint William SYRKIN,Rebecca HAAS-BATES,Sergio D.BECHARA and Richard ADAIR,all of Irvine, California, EACH its true and lawful agent and Attorney-in-Fact,to make,execute,seal and deliver,for,and on its behalf as surety,and as its act and deed:any and all bonds and undertakings,and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents,shall be as binding upon said Companies,as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes,as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York.,the regularly elected officers of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills,Maryland.,and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland.,in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V,Section 8, of the By-Laws of said Companies,and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice-President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,this 5th day of August,A.D.2015. ATTEST: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ¢�a.r �+ �,Mb.V ro w4a.•o..v�'•'S��1 BEAL Secretary Vice President Eric D.Barnes Thomas O.McClellan State of Maryland County of Baltimore On this 5th day of August,A.D.2015,before the subscriber,a Notary Public of the State of Maryland,duly commissioned and qualified,THOMAS O. MCCLELLAN,Vice President,and ERIC D.BARNES,Secretary,of the Companies,to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument,and acknowledged the execution of same,and being by me duly swom,deposeth and saith,that he/she is the said officer of the Company aforesaid, and that the seals affixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. ,,.n i r n„•• Vv'r��.,e✓N�- .,iii:.., ,'s''4. Constance A.Dunn,Notary Public My Commission Expires:July 9,2019 POA-F 012-0033D Item No . 10 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Payment to Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD)for the City of Temecula's Portion of the Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit for the Santa Margarita Watershed for Fiscal Year 2015-16 PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Approve payment to Riverside County Flood Control District(RCFCD), in the amount of $431,073.53, for the City of Temecula's Portion of the Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit for the Santa Margarita Watershed for Fiscal Year 2015-16. BACKGROUND: On January 10,2012,the City executed an Implementation Agreement with RCFCD, our principal permittee, to comply with the SMW National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit adopted by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Order No. R9-2010-0016). This Agreement establishes proportional cost shares for each permittee, based on a cost-sharing formula, to administer the Agreement and the management of regional components of the City's NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit. The regional components of the Order covered by the Agreement include water sampling programs, special studies, training programs for staff and the development community, watershed annual reports, receiving waters monitoring reports, a Standard Stormwater Mitigation Plan, a Hydromodification Plan, a Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan, public education/outreach programs, and reports of waste discharge. On February 9,2016, RCFCD, administrator of the Implementation Agreement,sent the City a letter and invoice requesting payment for the City's portion of the costs associated with the Agreement. Based on the Agreement's established cost-sharing formula, the City's cost is $431,073.53 for Fiscal Year 2015-16. FISCAL IMPACT: The City's portion, $431,073.53, of the Implementation Agreement costs for Fiscal Year 2015-16 has been budgeted in account number 001-164-605-5321. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter dated February 9, 2016 from RCFCD 2. Invoice for Fiscal Year 2015-16 from RCFCD 3 Implementation Agreement RECEM WARREN D.WILLIAMS ,f ;� '3{�fir, 1995 MARKET STREET General Manager-Chief Engineer ' RIVERSIDE,CA 92501 CITY MANAGER'S 951.955.1200 OFFICE FAX 951.788.9965 www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT February 9, 2016 Mr. Aaron Adams, City Manager City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Aldo Licitra Dear Mr. Adams: Re: FY 2015-2016 Cost-Sharing Reimbursement Regional Program Costs for Santa Margarita NPDES Permit In compliance with the Santa Margarita River Watershed NPDES Permit adopted by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board on November 10, 2010 as Order No. R9-2010-0016 (NPDES No. CAS0108766) and in accordance with the Implementation Agreement (IA) adopted by the County, District, and Cities of Murrieta, Temecula, and Wildomar (Permittees) on January 19, 2012, a cost-sharing provision between the Permittees was established. Per the IA, Item 3 "Shared Costs" provides for annual cost-sharing of regional program costs,with the"Combined Contribution"from the County and Cities not to exceed$2,200,000 annually. The District determined the "Combined Contribution"for the period of July 2015 through June 2016 to be a total of$1,647,679.63. After calculation of prior year credits and/or debits,the corrected cost-share is$1,185,540.75. Your Agency's individual contribution is$431,073.53. Therefore,please remit$431,073.53 as payment for the full amount and mail to the following address. Please note that payment is due within 60 days of receipt of invoice. Riverside County Flood Control&Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501-1770 Attention: Accounts Receivable Re: FY 2015-2016 Cost-Sharing Reimbursement Regional Program Costs for Santa Margarita NPDES Permit The District appreciates your continued cooperation with this important program. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call Stuart McKibbin at 951.955.1273 or David Garcia at 951.955.1330. { Very truly yo WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer Attachments: Table and Invoice ec: Santa Margarita NPDES Permit Representatives (via e-mail) DHG:cw P8/202216 FY 2015-2016 Cost-Sharing Reimbursement Regional Program Costs for Santa Margarita NPDES Permit FY 2015-16 AGENCY Individual Contribution County $248385,85 Murrieta $386J24.73 Temecula $431,473.53 Wildomar $119,556.64 Corrected Cost-Share: $1,185,540.75 P8/202216 County of Riverside INVOICE Page: 1 Invoice No: FC0000015293 Invoice Date: 02/03/2016 Customer Number: FC-000576 Payment Terms: 30 Days Due Date: 03/04/2016 Contact Person: Flood Control Accounts Receiva Inquiry Number: 951-955-1245 CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 9033 TEMECULA CA 92589-9033 For billinq questions, please call 951-955-1245_ Line Adj yIdentifier Description Quantity UOM Unit Amt NetAmount 1 FY15/16 COST SHARING 1.0000 EA 431,073.53 431,073.53 CUSTOMER NOTE: REIMBURSEMENT OF REGIONAL PROGRAM COSTS FOR SANTA MARGARITA NPDES PERMIT 679 R9922 / 8-9-00980 SUBTOTAL: 431,073.53 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE : 431 073.53 _ Please Remit To: Invoice No: FC0000015293 County of Riverside Invoice Date: 02/03/2016 Flood Control Customer Number: FC-000576 Accounting 1995 Market St Riverside CA 92501 AMOUNT DUE: 431,073.53 United States Enclosed: ATTN: FC-A/R Original P8/141799 AGREEMENT 1 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 2 Stormwater Discharge Pert-nit Implementation Agreement 3 San Diego Region 4 (Santa Margarita Drainage Area) 5 6 This Implementation Agreement ("Agreetnent"), entered into by the RIVERSIDI COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (the 7 8 "DISTRICT"), the COUNTY Or RIVERSIDE (the "COUNTY"), and the CITIES OF 9 MURRIETA, TEMECULA and WILDOMAR (the "CITIES"), collectively referred to as 10 "COPERMITTEES" and sometimes also referred to as "Parties", individually each as "Party", I I establishes the responsibilities of each Party concerning the implementation of and compliance 12 with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Municipal Separate Storm 13 Sewer System ("MS4") Discharge Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality 14 Control Board — San Diego Region (CRWQCB-SDR) pursuant to Order No. R9-2010-0016 (the 15 "NPDES Permit"). 16 RECITALS 17 WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Ig Act ("CWA") (33 U.S.C.§1342(p)); and 19 WFIEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires certain municipalities to obtain 20 NPDES Permits in order to discharge stormwater from MS4s to waters of the United States; and 21 WHEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires operators of certain industrial 22 facilities to obtain NPDES permits for stormwater discharges associated with designated 23 industrial activities, including construction activities; and 24 WHEREAS, Section 402(p) further requires the United States Environmental 25 Protection Agency ("EPA") to promulgate regulations for NPDES permit applications; and 26 WHEREAS, EPA adopted such regulations in November 1990; and 27 WHEREAS, EPA delegated authority to the California State Water Resources 28 Control Board ("SWRCB") to administer the NPDES permit process within the boundaries of the State of California; and •1- 1'8/1 4 1 799 I WHEREAS, SWRCB has in turn delegated its NPDES permitting authority to the 2 California Regional Water Quality Control Boards to administer the NPDES permit process 3 within the boundaries of their respective regions; and 4 WHEREAS, the jurisdiction of the CRWQCB-SDR includes that portion of 5 Riverside County known as the Santa Margarita Region; and 6 WHEREAS, DISTRICT was created to provide for, among other things, the 7 control of flood and stormwaters within the County of Riverside and is empowered to 8 investigate, examine, measure, analyze, study and inspect matters pertaining to flood and 9 stormwaters; and 10 WHEREAS, on January 15, 2009, DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES submitted 11 a Report of Waste Discharge as an application to renew NPDES Permit No. CAS0108766; and 12 WHEREAS, the application for renewal of the NPDES Permit was submitted in 13 accordance with the provisions of the previous NPDES permit (Order No. R9-2004-001) which 14 expired on July 14, 2009; and 15 WHEREAS, on November 10, 2010, the CRWQCB-SDR adopted Order No. R9- 16 2010-0016 to serve as Waste Discharge Requirements in accordance with Section 13263(x) of 17 the California Water Code and as an NPDESursuant ermit to Section 402 p p (p) of the CWA; and 18 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 19 402(p)(3)(B) of the CWA; and 20 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit designates the DISTRICT, COUNTY and 21 CITIES as COPERMITTEES; and 22 WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit requires designation of a "Principal 23 Copermittee", and DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITiI'S have: agreed that DISTRICT will serve as 24 Principal Copermittee for the term of the NPDES Permit; and 25 WHEREAS, the Parties believe that cooperation between COPERMITTEES in 26 the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permit is in the best interest of 27 COPERMITTEES; and 28 WI-IERI.AS, the NPI)ES Permit provides that the COPERMITTEES collaborate -2- 1'8/141799 1 in the development and implementation of various requirements of the NPDES Permit; and 2 WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to utilize its staff to coordinate the activities of 3 COPERMITTEES to facilitate compliance with the NPDES Permit and CWA requirements; and g WHEREAS, DISTRICT established the Santa Margarita Watershed Benefit Assessment Area (the "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT") pursuant to District Ordinance 14 on May 6 14, 1991 to offset the DISTRICT'S program and administrative costs associated with the 7 development, implementation and management of the Federally-mandated NPDES Program and S DISTRICT is willing to use BENEFIT ASSESSMENT funds to support the DISI"RICT's role as `} Principal Permittee and to support regional program costs to the extent that BENEFIT 10 ASSESSMENT funds are available and can be used for regional programs; and I I WHEREAS, COPERMITTEES are to perform and/or execute certain activities 12 prescribed in the NPDES Permit that will benefit all COPERMITTEES. 13 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties do mutually agree as follows: 1`J 1. Incorporation of the NPDES Permit. The NPDES Permit is hereby 15 incorporated by reference in its entirety and made a part of this Agreement as Exhibit "A" 16 2. Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the 17 COPERMITTEES under the NPDES Permit are reiterated below in subsections 2.a. and 2.b. 18 Additional delegated responsibilities of the Parties under this Agreement to implement and/or 19 comply with the NPDES Permit are set forth below in subsections 2.c. through 2.h.: t) a. DISTRICT shall: 21 (1) Comply with Section M (Principal Copennittee Responsibilities), including coordinating; the development 23 of updates and reports on programs required under the 24 NPDES Permit that are jointly required of each 25 COPERMITTEE, including the Watershed Water Quality 26 Workplan ("Watershed Workplan"), Standard Storm Water 27 Mitigation Plan ("SSMP"), Hydromodification 28 Management Plan ("HMP"), a model Jurisdictional Runoff -3- 118/141799 1 Management Plan ("J RMP"), the Receiving Waters and 2 MS4 Discharge Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 3 R9-2010-0016, and any other reports prepared by the 1 DISTRICT on behalf of the COPT RMf TEI-?S as required 5 by Sections K.1 and K.2 of the NPDES Permit. DISTRICT 6 will provide COUNTY and CITIES an opportunity to 7 participate in the development and review of, and comment 8 on, such programs, plans and reports prior to submittal to 9 the CRWQCl3-SDR. 10 (2) Comply with Sections A through P (Prohibitions and I I Receiving Water Limitations, Non-Stormwater Discharges, 12 Non-Stormwater Dry Weather Action Levels, Stormwater 13 Action Levels, Legal Authority, JRMP, Watershed 14 Workplan, Discal Analysis, Total Maximum Daily Loads 15 ("TMDLs"), Program Effectiveness Assessment and M Reporting, Reporting, Modifications of Programs, 17 Receiving Waters and MS4 Discharge Monitoring and 18 Reporting Program, Standard Provisions, Reporting 19 Requirements and Notifications, as well as Additional 20 Provisions, respectively), as they pertain to pollutant 21 discharges frons DISTRICT owned and operated MS4 2 which are generated directly from or by DISTRICT 23 facilities and operations, at no cost to COUNTY and 24 CITIES. 25 b. COUNTY and CI`T'IES, at no cost to DISTRICT, shall, for land 20 area within their individual jurisdictions: 27 (1) Comply with Sections A through P (Prohibitions and 28 Receiving Water Limitations, Non-Stormwater Discharges, -4- /18/141799 1 Non-Stormwater Dry Weather Action Levels, Stormwater 2 Action Levels, Legal Authority, JRMP, Watershed 3 Workplan, Fiscal Analysis, TMDLs, Program Effectiveness 4 Assessment and Reporting, Reporting, Modifications of 5 Programs, Receiving Waters and MS4 Dischargc 6 Monitoring and Reporting Program, Standard Provisions, 7 Reporting Requirements and Notifications, as well as g Additional Provisions, respectively), as they pertain to 9 pollutant discharges from COUNTY/CITY owned and 10 operated MS4, which are generated by jurisdictional land 11 uses, facilities, and operations of the respective COUNTY 12 and CITIES. 13 (2) Demonstrate compliance with NPDES Permit requirements 14 through timely implementation of the JRMPs; any. 15 COPCRIVIITTEE-specific elements of the Watershed 16 Workplan and Monitoring and Reporting Program; and any 17 approved modifications, revisions or amendments thereto. 18 (3) Provide to DISTRICT' (on DIS'T'RICT-provided forms) 19 information needed to satisfy the reporting requirements as 20 described in Sections Ci, N, and Provision III of Attachment Z1 E, or to respond to information requests from the 22 CRWQCB-SBR. COUNTY and CITIES shall specifically: 23 (a) Submit data necessary to prepare updates to the 24 Watershed Workplan to the DISTRICT no later 25 than August 3 I"of each year. 26 (b) Submit any monitoring and sampling data 27 individually collected pursuant to the MS4 Permit, 28 to the DIS"TRIC"f at Ieast quarterly as necessary for -5- /'8/141799 1 DISTRICT to track and prepare reports under the 2 Monitoring and Reporting Program. All applicable 3 monitoring and sampling data individually collected 4 within each fiscal year must be received by 5 DISTRICT no later than August 15`I' of each year, 6 Por inclusion in the monitoring annual report that 7 will be prepared and submitted by the District, g pursuant to Section 2.e. herein. 9 (c) Provide one completed bound hard copy, and two 10 electronic copies (PDF preferred) on CD ol• DVD, 11 of the completed JRMP annual report to the 12 DISTRICT no later than October 15`1' of each year. 13 (d) Provide information on existing MS4 facilities, 14 "major outfalls" (as defined in the NPDES Permit) 15 and/or other data as it pertains to facilities of the 16 COUNTY or CITIES when requested by 17 DISTRICT. 18 C. Public Education Program. On behalf of COPERMITT I'EES, 19 DISTRICT shall conduct public education activities on a regional 20 basis that focus on reducing pollution of'urban runoff within the 21 Santa Margarita Region, including, as appropriate, developing and 22 disseminating broadcast, online and/or print outreach and 23 advertising, developing brochures, and attending public events. 24 DISTRICT" shall also develop and implement mechanisms to 25 determine the effectiveness of the regional public education 26 program. The COUNTY and CITIES shall be individually 27 responsible for developing and implementing any supplemental 28 public education programs that may be necessary to target -6- PR/141799 1 individual communities or stakeholders within their respective 2 jurisdictions.. pursuant to Section F.6. of the NPDES Permit. 3 d. COPERMITTI'sl: "rraining Program. On behalf of 4 COPERMI'1'"I'1:ES, and as requested by the COPERMITTEES, 5 DISTRIC'I' shall develop and conduct regional training sessions for 6 COPERMITI'EE personnel, covering the aspects of the programs 7 developed by DISTRICT pursuant to Section 2.a.(I) of this g AGREEMENT that are regionally uniform among g COPERMITTEES. The COUNTY and CITIES shall be 10 individually responsible for developing and implementing and I I reporting upon any supplemental training that may be necessary to 12 ensure that their personnel are trained adequately regarding local 13 policies and procedures for implementing the requirements of the 14 NPDES Permit, pursuant to section F.6. of the NPDES Permit. 15 C. Monitoring Program. On behalf of the COPERMITTEES, 16 DISTRICT shall perforce sampling of surface water and urban 17 runoff in accordance with the provisions of the NPDES Permit 18 Monitoring and Repocting Program ("MRP"), Attachment E 19 Provisions ILA and ILD-II.F, and prepare and submit Monitoring 20 Reports in accordance with Provision III of Attachment E. The 21 location of the sampling sites shall be determined by 22 COPERMITTEES, subject to approval by CRWQCB-SDR. For 23 Provision II.I3. and ILC of the MRP, DIS'T'RICT will coordinate 24 with COPERMITTEES in developing a plan for identifying the list 25 oldoutfalls to be sampled each year in accordance with the NPDES 26 Permit, and COPERMITTEES shall be individually responsible for 27 conducting outfall sampling, source identifications, and 28 enforcement as necessary fol' their outfalls. The COPERMIT'l"I ES -7- P8/1 41799 I may, subject to Section 3 herein, request the DISTRICT to conduct 2 the initial outfall sampling required in Provisions II.13. and II.C. on 3 behalf of the COPERMITTEIS, however, all source 4 identifications (including any follow-up sampling) and 5 enforcement that may be required will remain the individual C responsibility of the respective COPERMITTEIS. The 7 DISTRICT shall also enter into a contract with a local lab to 8 provide analysis of water duality samples collected under the 9 MRP. The contract shall be used strictly for water quality samples 10 collected to comply with Provision 11 of the MRP. DIS"TRIC"T' II shall prepare and submit Monitoring Reports, as required by 12 Provision III of Attachment E, based on data collected by the 13 DISTRICT on behalf of the COPERMITTEES, and data provided 14 to the DISTRICT by the COPERMITTEES in accordance with 15 Section 2.b.(3)(b)of this Agreement. 16 f. Consultant Services. In the event DISTRICT requires the services 17 of a consultant(s) to assist in performing duties conducted on 18 behalf of the COPERMITTEES pursuant to Section 2 of this 19 Agreement, the cost of said consultant(s) services shall be shared 20 by COPERMITTEES in accordance with the cost sharing 21 provisions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY and 22 CITIES shall be notified in writing of DISTRIC'T'S request for 23 proposals from one or more consultants, selection of a consultant, 24 consultant's fee, contract timetable and payment schedule, and be 25 allowed the opportunity to participate in decisions related to 26 consultant's services. All consultant agreements are contingent 27 upon the consulting firm's ability to meet DIS'T'RICT standards and 28 requirements, and where applicable approval by the DISTRICT'S 8 /18/141799 1 Board of Supervisors. 2 g. Support for Regional Programs, The COPERMTI'TEES shall 3 jointly provide funding for certain regional efforts that benefit the 4 Santa Margarita Region, including but not limited to: County 5 Environmental Health's Compliance Assistance Program; the 6 County lire Department's Hazardous Materials Team; County 7 Environmental Health's Household Hazardous Waste and Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil and Paint collection program; the 9 DISTRICT'S membership with the California Stormwater Quality 10 Association on behalf of COPERMITTEES; the DISTRIC'T'S 1 I administration of Principal Permittee duties, and other NPDES 1' support activities as described in this Agreement, or as needed and 13 agreed to by the CO PERM I'l-I'EES. Where these programs are 14 implemented countywide in support of other NPDES permit 15 regions, the DISTRICT shall estimate the portion of the total cost 16 of these regional programs that benefits the Santa Margarita 17 Region. 18 h. Regulation and Enforcement. COUNTY and CITIES shall be 19 responsible for the regulation and enforcement of local ordinances ?t:) and regulations within their respective jurisdictions to ensure 21 compliance with the NPDES Permit, and to prevent pollutants -12 originating from within their respective jurisdictions from being ?3 discharged into the jurisdiction of another Party in a manner which 44 could cause that Party to violate the NPDES Permit. This includes 25 the exercise of police powers and land use controls and the 26 enforcement of ordinances that COUNTY or CITIES presently ?7 have adopted or may adopt in the future. 28 -9- 1 3. Shared Costs. Costs For services to be performed in accordance with 2 Sections 2.c., 2.d., 2.e. and 21 of this Agreement shall be shared by the Parties in accordance 3 with the procedure specified 'below. In December of each year ot'this Agreement the DISTRIC'I' 4 shall; 5 a. Estimate the costs of services specified in Sections 2.c., 2.d., 2.e. G of this Agreement and 2.1, for the upcoming; fiscal year 7 ("ESTIMATED COSTS"); 8 b. Estimate the DISTRICT'S internal costs for developing, 9 implementing and administering the NPDES program in the Santa 10 Margarita Region as specified in 2.a. ("IN'TERNAL COSTS"); II C. Estimate the revenues expected from the BENEFIT 12 ASSESSMENT program("ASSESSME'sNT REVENUES"); 13 d. Determine actual costs for NPDES programs administered in the 14 previous fiscal year; and 15 C. Determine Credits or Debits ("CREDITS" or "DEBITS") due to 16 COUNTY and CITIES based on the difference of the actual 17 contributions from the previous fiscal year with the actual 18 contributions provided by the COUNTY and CITIES for that fiscal 19 year. 20 By February I" of each year of this Agreement, the DISTRICT, CITIES and 21 COUNTY, through a NPDES representative assigned by the General Manager-Chief Engineer, 22 City Managers, and County Executive Office, respectively, shall approve, by majority vote, 23 ESTIMATED COSTS for the upcoming fiscal year. 24 3.1 DISTRICT Contribution 25 The DISTRICT contribution ("DISTRICT CONTRIBUTION") to 26 programs specified in Sections 2.c., 2.d., 2.c., and 2.f. for the upcoming fiscal year shall be 27 determined using the following formula: 28 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTION ASSESSMENT REVENUES - -10- P8/14}799 1 INTERNAL COSTS -20% ASSESSMENTRLVENUI3. 2 If the calculation yields a negative result, the DISTRICT shall have no 3 contribution for the upcoming fiscal year other than the INTERNAL COST'S it has incurred. 4 3.2 COUN'T'Y and. CITIES C:0antrihuti011 5 The total shared COUNTY and CITIES contribution (the "COMBINED 6 CONTRIBUTION") shall be determined using the following formula: 7 COMBINED CONTRIBUTION -= EST'IMAT'ED COSTS - DISTRICT g CONTRIBUTION. 9 The COUNTY'S and individual CITIES' respective pro rata share of the i0 COMBINED CONTRIBUTION ("INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION") shall be determined on 1 1 the basis of an equally weighted average of population and Benefit Assessment Units within the 12 Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County. More specifically, such percentage contribution 13 shall be calculated as the equally weighted average of: 14 (a) The population of COUNTY or individual CITIES within the 15 Santa Margarita Region, divided by the total population of the 16 COUNTY and CITIES in the Santa Margarita Region and; 17 (b) The calculated number of' Benefit Assessment units ("BAU") for 18 COUNTY or individual CITIES, divided by the total BAU for 19 COUNTY and individual CITIES. 20 The INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION shall be further adjusted by any 21 CREDITS or DEBITS due from the previous fiscal year. 22 The population of CITIES shall be determined by the latest California State 23 Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year. COUNTY population 24 shall be based on the most current Tax Rate Area ("TRA") information best fitting the Santa 25 Margarita Region. 26 The BAU count of COUNTY and CITIES shall be estimated by comparing 27 the most current TRA information best fitting the Santa Margarita Region with the Assessment 28 t District retains 20% of assessment revenue as a reserve for District's administrative and program costs associated with the NPDES Permit pursuant to RCFC&WCL)Ordinance No. 14. -I1- P8/141799 I Rolls from the current fiscal year's BENEFIT ASSESSMENT Engineer's Report. 2 COUNTY and CITII-.S may generate credits toward payments due by 3 providing labor or services in lieu of cash payments. DISTRICT shall determine value of labor 4 or services based on ESTIMA'T'ED COSTS for the fiscal year. 5 DISTRICT shall invoice COUNTY and CITIES for INDIVIDUAL, 6 CONTRIBUTION at the beginning of each fiscal year and said invoice shall be due and payable 7 by COUNTY and CITIES within. 60 days of receipt of invoice from DISTRICT. The g COMBINED CONTRIBUTION for COUNTY and CITIES shall not exceed $2,200,000 (two 9 million, two hundred thousand dollars) annually under this Agreement. 10 4. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on 11 the date of execution by the duly authorized representative of at least three of the five 12 COPERMITTEES. The term of this Agreement shall extend for up to eighteen (18) months 13 beyond the period of time in which the term of the NPDES Permit remains in valid Force and 14 effect, unless terminated prior to that date by agreement by all the Parties or withdrawal of all of 15 the Parties in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 16 5. Additional Parties. Any City which incorporates after the date of issuance 17 of the NPDES Permit and/or after the commencement of this Agreement ("Prospective City") 18 may file a written request with DISTRICT asking to be added as a Party. Upon receipt of such a 19 request, DISTRICT shall solicit the approval or denial of the Parties. If a majority of the .Parties, 20 each having one, co-equal vote, approves the addition of the Prospective City, this Agreement 21 shall be amended to reflect the addition, and the Prospective City shall thereafter become a Party 22 under this Agreement. upon execution of the Amended Agreement, the Prospective City shall 23 be responsible for the shared costs discussed in Section 3 of this Agreement for the then-current 24 budget year and any subsequent budget year. 25 6. Withdrawal frons the A rg„eement. Any Party shall be eligible to withdraw 26 from this Agreement atter first giving 60 days written notice to the DISTRICT and the 27 CRWQCB-SDR. The withdrawing Party shall agree in such notice to apply with the CRWQCB- 28 SDR for a separate NPDES permit and to comply with all of the requirements established by -12- 1)8/141799 1 CRWQCI3-SDIt. In addition, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture of all of the withdrawing 2 Party's already-paid share of the costs allocated pul.suant to Section 3. The withdrawing Party 3 shall be responsible for any lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of its withdrawal. In 4 addition, the withdrawing Party shall remain liable as an Indemnitor Party after the effective date 5 of its withdrawal as described in Section 7 below. The cost allocations to the remaining Parties 6 shall be recalculated in the following budget year. 7 7. Mutual Indemnification, Each Party (hereafter "Indernnitor Party") shall 8 indemnify, defend and hold harmless any other Party, together with that Party's employees, 9 officers, managers, governing board members, counsel, representatives and agents (collectively 10 "Indemnitee Parties"), from and against any and all damages, liabilities, losses, demands, 11 lawsuits, orders, actions, causes of action, penalties, judgments, claims, costs and expenses 12 (including reasonable attorneys' fees, including through all appeals) arising from or related to 13 any violation of the NPDES Permit or this Agreement (collectively "Losses") to the extent 14 caused by (i) by the acts or omissions of the Indemnitor Party and its employees, agents and 15 representatives, (ii) discharges from the Indemnitor Party's jurisdictional area or facilities, and/or 16 (iii) discharges from any MS4 owned or operated by the Indemnitor Party. The obligations of 17 the Indemnitor Party set forth in this Section 7 are non-exclusive and are in addition to, and do 18 not replace or modify, any other rights of action, whether at law or in equity, that any Party may 19 have against another Party. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the ability of any Party to seek 20 any relief, legal or equitable, against any non-Party. The obligations set forth in this Section 7 21 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.as to all such acts, omissions or discharges as 22 described in subparts (i) through (iii) hereinabove that occurred, or are alleged to have occurred, 23 while a Party during the term of the Agreement up until such time that it is terminated. 24 8. Amendments to the Ag-reement. Except as provided in Section 5, this 20 Agreement may only be amended by consent of all Parties. No amendment to this Agreement 26 shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of all 27 Parties. 28 -13- /18/131799 1 9. Authorized -S'ianatories. The General Manager-Chief Engineer of 2 DISTRICT, the Chief Executive Officer of COUN'T'Y and the City Managers of CITIES (or their 3 designees) shall be authorized to execute all documents and take all other procedural steps 4 necessary to file for and obtain an NPDES permit(s) or amendments thereto. 5 10, Notices. All notices shall be deemed duty given when delivered by hand; 6 or three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. Notice to the Parties shall be 7 sent to the publically advertised mailing address for the Party. 8 11. Governing Law and Severability. This Agreement shall be governed and 9 construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any provision or provisions 10 of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, II legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or 12 impaired hereby. 13 12. Consent to Waiver and Breach. No term or provision hereof shall be 14 deemed waived and no breach excused, unless the waiver or breach is consented to in writing, 15 and signed by the Party or Parties affected. Consent by any Party to a waiver or breach by any 16 other Party shall not constitute consent to any different or subsequent waiver or breach. 17 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto 18 constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter therein; all 19 prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and undertakings are superseded 20 hereby. 21 14. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and 22 delivered in any number of counterparts or copies (counterparts) by the Parties. As each Party 23 has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other Parties, each counterpart shall be 24 deemed an original and, taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement, which 25 shall be binding and effective as to the Parties. 26 15. Non-Waiver of Objections. The entry into, and the performance of this 27 Agreement by the Parties shall not constitute, nor be construed as, any waiver of the 28 COPERMITTEES` objection to any provisions of the NPDES Permit including, without -14- P8/141799 l limitation, any provisions identified in the Petition foe Review filed by the COPCRM1TTEES 2 with the SWRCB, or that provisions of the NPUES Permit constitute an unfunded State mandate 3 without subvention of State funds. 4 5 6 7 8 9 . 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -15- P3/141799 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed 1 as of the dates set forth below. 3 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RECOIvIMENDE O P ROVA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT s By � E L� B WARREN D. WILLIAMS MARI01 ASHLEY, Chairman 6 General Manager-Chief Engineer Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors 7 8 Dated: 9 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: 10 PAMELA J. WALLS KECIA HARPER-IHEM 1 1 Coun ounsel , Clerk to t4p Board 1 kL�7 "�cL- ,, r B XAb By Y I K&RfN WATTS-BAZAN I7ep ty Principal Deputy County Counsel 14 r Dated ' sy'� � L1 2 (SEAL) 15 16 COMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 By By" is LARRY PARRISH BOB BUSTER, Chairman Interim County Executive Officer Riverside County Board of Supervisors 19 20 Dated: ATTEST: I KECIA HARPER-IHEM Clerk to the Board By 3 Deputy 24 (SEAL) 25 3U:AMM:cw 216 11/03/11 ,7 �g -16- DEC 0 6 2011 1, r P8/141799 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the dates set forth below. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By By WARREN D. WILLIAMS MARION ASHLEY, Chairman General Manager-Chief Engineer Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors DaLed: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: KECIA HARPER-II-1EM Clerk to the Board B y, � – B y PAMELA J. WALLS Deputy County Counsel Dated: (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By — z BOB BUSTER, Chairman Riverside County Board of Supervisors Dated: ATTEST: KECIA HARPER-IHEM Clerk to the Board WHEN DOCUMENT 1S FULLY EXECUTED RE'T'URN 1 CLA'RK'S COPY By AL to Riverside County Clerk e'the Board,Stop 1010 e uty Post Office Box 1147, Riverside,Ca 92502-1147 Thank you. (SEAL) JU:AMM:cw 11/03/11 -16- ncr, a a ?nii z 1 1 PS/141799 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TFMECUIfA. ly By 11ater M. Thorson, City Attomey Chuck Washington, Ma r' ATTEST; k*tvL Dated: I ID �l 2 S an W Zones,M C, Cit Clerk E -17- P8/141799 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF MURRIETA 1 1 2 By , tc Cl 3 City�C[torney i Mayor 4 ATTEST: 5 � y By Lv s -.-� Dated: tQ h liar q 7. —c 1 ;:4- 6 ;:46 City Cler 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -18- P8/141799 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF WILDOMAR 1 2 BY _ BY City Attome Mayor 3 A441J� v 4 ATTEST: 5 By, /�� Dated: 6 City Clerk 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -19- Item No . 11 Approvals A� City Attorney IZVA Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for Temecula Grand Prix Bicycle Race PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the Temecula Grand Prix Bicycle Race Special Event. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Grand Prix Bicycle Race necessitates the physical closure of certain roads within the Rancho California Business Park (Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive) to provide for safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. Cast a Shadow, a local non-profit organization, is producing the bicycle race event on Saturday, April 23, 2016. The road closures for the race course will include Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive with full closure of all lanes except for event access to parking areas within the Rancho California Business Park. The event includes timed bicycle races and a health fair that focuses on how to live to 100. The event is scheduled for Saturday, April 23, 2016, during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., with actual road closures occurring between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The estimated number of participants anticipated is approximately 4,000 to 5,000. The street closures are scheduled as follows: Business Park Drive (Loop) Saturday, April 23, 2016 north of Single Oak Drive from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Single Oak Drive Saturday, April 23, 2016 between Business Park Drive (E &W) from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The proposed race course and associated street closures are shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto. A Traffic Control and Detour Plan for the event has been approved by staff and is on file with the Public Works Department. All required traffic control signs and devices will be provided by the sponsors. On-site parking for participants and spectators will be available at designated private lots within the Business Park. As a condition of a Special Event Permit issuance, the applicant has obtained approval via signatures of all affected parties and businesses where the event interferes with the normal flow of traffic and business access. The sponsors have posted insurance in accordance with requirements of Resolution No. 91-96. Street closures are allowed by the California Vehicle Code upon approval by the local governing body for certain conditions. Under Vehicle Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways," local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." Chapter 12.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Parades and Special Events, provides standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way and authorizes the City Council or City Manager to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these events. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. Sponsors will provide their own traffic control and street closure devices. Any police services required for these events will be negotiated by the Police Department and event sponsors. ATTACHMENT: Exhibit "A" 0 Pedestrian Crossing Location T Start/Finish Closed Road Elpaddock Club Event Traffic Only Vendor Location Podium and Results a■ �" i l�A leer+ V it I ;c 1;?;, Sate' Pedestrian Barricades/Lane Separators - © Bathroom Locations 0 Registration/Primmes ' Command Center Parking dTTG R Operations Layout F • 0� r �1- ' • -e:. A � ..r� f CENTER T f + ! ! Di Lancs 1P1]I LIS IJI s r . C. l+ '�r €�• Sri_+ :n' om Parking ' r Road Separated for Vehicle & Race Course by C. Cones: Only for Parking to event • r - FF�• i� � _. � v ` A ♦r I of s EXHIBIT "A" Road Separated for Vehicle & Race Course i Only to for Business Entry TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CONSENT CALENDAR Item No . 12 ACTION MINUTES February 23, 2016 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District meeting convened at 7:26 PM CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, McCracken, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS • PT Rothschild CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 10 Approve the Action Minutes of February 9, 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Director Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Director McCracken; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of February 9, 2016. 11 Approve an Agreement with Timmy D' Productions, Inc. for Entertainment and Technical Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Director Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Director McCracken; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the Board of Directors approve an Agreement with Timmy D' Productions, Inc., in the amount of$75,000, for entertainment and technical services. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD Action Minutes 022316 1 CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 8, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, TCSD President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 022316 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BUSINESS Item No . 13 Approvals City Attorney A� Finance Director City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Community Services Director DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Receive and File Human Services Update (At the Request of Director Naggar) PREPARED BY: Yvette Martinez, Sr. Recreation Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file this Human Services Update (At the Request of Director Naggar). BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula Community Services Department is committed to providing productive, healthy, and diverse activities as well as the long-term support needed by the City's youth, teens, adults and seniors. In that effort, the Human Services Division offers programs, activities, classes, services, and events geared to meet the unique needs of Active Adults/Seniors, and children and families with special needs, including: • Active Adults/Senior Services: In addition to the classes, activities, and senior support services offered daily at the Mary Phillips Senior Center (MPSC), the Senior Services Team has taken on the following initiatives: o Senior Services Master Plan (SSMP)—At the direction of Council Member Matt Rahn, the Human Services Staff began developing the SSMP in August 2015 with objective of engaging community professionals, caregivers, advocates, elected officials, media, and community partners in the process of developing a plan to further enrich the lives of aging adults in the City of Temecula through programs and services. Topics included diversity of aging, transportation, healthcare, and housing. Staff is currently creating a draft SSMP for review. o Temecula Health & Community Resource Fair—Scheduled for September 24, 2016 at the Civic Center. This educational and interactive event offers free health screenings, valuable information, and samples for improving one's health and overall wellness. The event provides individuals with an opportunity to learn about community resources for health and wellness, safety, and special needs, thereby positively impacting adults and children within the City of Temecula and surrounding areas. o Senior Talk—Senior Talk is an ongoing, free, monthly series where speakers share their expertise on physical and mental health topics, current events, social issues, and more. On Monday, March 14th, Senior Talk will feature Jennifer Trebler from Arbor Hospice speaking on "Aging with Awareness." o Free Tax Aide is available from February 5-April 15, 2016. AARP Tax Aide volunteers are available to assist low- and middle- income taxpayers, with special emphasis on those 60 and over. This free service includes preparation and e- filing of tax returns. o Upcoming Senior Events: § Braille Mobile Solutions Low Vision Wellness Services will be offering appointments. 5 Valley Physicians Network will offer free Blood Pressure Screening. 5 The MPSC will honor March birthday celebrants with birthday cake on March 14th at 11:00am. 5 The MPSC will celebrate the "Luck o' the Irish" with a St. Paddy's Day Party on Thursday, March 17, from 10:30am – 12:OOpm. • Inclusion Services: The Human Services team continues to provide, facilitate, collaborate, and encourage programs and services, including recreation, sports, and therapeutic opportunities that build on existing resources. o Eagle Soar Playground & Splash Pad at Margarita Community Park—In conjunction with Our Nicholas Foundation and Comprehensive Autism Center, the City is currently offering spring specialized sessions at the park. The second Saturday of each month from 9:00 am – 11:00 am is designated for children and families with special needs to play and learn in a safe, low-stress environment. o GOAL (Giving Opportunities to ALL) Luncheon was held on February 18, 2016 at the Temecula Conference Center. With an estimated 150 attendees from the business community, the City in partnership with non-profit EXCEED discussed the benefits and importance of inclusion in the workplace. Presentations included organizations like the Department of Rehabilitation, Albertsons, and LOWE's. The objective of the luncheon was to improve employment outcomes for people with disabilities through highlighting the benefits of hiring, retaining, and advancing people with disabilities in the workplace. The knowledge, skills, and abilities employees bring to work each day are the assets that yield by far the most output over the long term. Whether good economic times or bad, organizations that know how to identify and recognize talent are most likely to succeed. Businesses that are inclusive of people with disabilities—in recruitment, retention and advancement—benefit from a wider pool of talent, skills, and creative business solutions. Additionally, work environments that are flexible and open to the talents of all qualified individuals, including those with disabilities, promote workplace success for everyone. o Global Citizens Viticulture & Hospitality Vocational Program—This successful vocational training program continues with an 8-week long Spring program beginning February 24, 2016 through April 18, 2016. This session includes 15 students, an increase from last fall's program of 10 students. Students will receive new opportunities for hands-on and on-the-job training from Spero Vineyards and now our new partner, Wilson Creek Winery. Greg Pennyroyal, Wilson Creek Vineyard Manager and Viticulture Professor at MSJC, has offered to collaborate with the City to improve the curriculum with his analysis of the program, expert knowledge and instruction, and hospitality management skills training. o BEYOND Grant—The City of Temecula's Global Citizens Viticulture & Hospitality Vocational program was awarded grant funding by WRCOG's BEYOND Framework Grant. The program addresses the WRCOG's Economic Development & Sustainability Framework. The grant funding support the expansion of the program via reimbursement of supply costs, material fees, field experiences, consultants, field trips, excursions and transportation. o Pala Park Re-Design—The Inclusion Services Team continues to provide expertise supporting the proposed renovation of Pala Park, including information regarding compliance and best practices, as well as creative ideas drawn from the continually evolving world of special needs recreation. Together with staff from Public Works and Planning, TCSD is working to ensure that the new park design will provide a world-class opportunity for safe, fun, stimulating play that is sensitive to the physical, sensory, emotional, cognitive, and social needs of children with special needs and their families. o Spero Film—This film documents the unique public-private partnership with the City's Global Citizens program and Spero project to train and equip young adults with the skills necessary to obtain meaningful employment. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Item No . 14 Approvals �— City Attorney 11 Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Planning Application Numbers PA14-0051 and PA15-1664, Development Agreement and Specific Plan Amendments to Modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement and Specific Plan Timing Requirements for Improvements Required by the Existing Approvals for Phase II of Roripaugh Ranch PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 97121030) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 15-1664) 3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14-0051) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The ordinance consists of an amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement to allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements which are required by the existing approvals for the Phase II area of Roripaugh Ranch. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase II builders. BACKGROUND: The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (RRSP) was approved by City Council on November 26, 2002 and a 10-year Development Agreement was approved by City Council on December 17, 2002. At this time, the City Council also certified a comprehensive Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for all of the land use approvals and the Development Agreement for the Project. In April 2013, the City Council approved an amendment to the Development Agreement and certified Addendum No. 1 to the EIR for a 15-year extension to the Development Agreement from 2013 to 2028. The RRSP and Development Agreement provide that the issuance of building permits for Phase II of the Specific Plan are conditioned upon the completion of design and construction of certain improvements. The proposed Specific Plan and Development Agreement Amendments would modify the schedule and building permit "trigger points" or "building permit thresholds" for various public improvements related to development in Phase II of the Specific Plan. The owners of the Phase II properties have requested modifications to the infrastructure implementation schedule to be able to install them in a more cost effective and efficient manner based on current market conditions. The approved RRSP allows for the development of 2,015 residential units on 804.7 acres, including 1,056 low and low medium density single-family units, and 959 medium density single family units. The RRSP also allows development of 15.4 acres (110,000 square feet) of commercial uses, a 22-acre elementary school site, a 20-acre middle school site, a 5.1-acre neighborhood park, a 19.7-acre community park with lighted athletic fields, 9.1 acres of private recreational facilities, 202.7 acres of biological habitat, 56.6 acres of flood control and landscaped slope areas, and a 2-acre fire station. At build out, the project would have a gross density of 2.5 units per total acre and a net density of 4.88 units per residential acre. The project is required to construct a number of improvements, including the completion of regional and local roads such as Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Nicolas Road, and major sewer, water and drainage facilities. Development Agreement Amendment Planning Application PA14-0051 is a Development Agreement Amendment to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement. These changes would allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements identified in Exhibit A to Attachment No. 4 (Ordinance — Third Amendment to Development Agreement) which are required by the existing approvals for the Phase 11 area of Roripaugh Ranch. The Phase 11 area of the RRSP is generally situated along both sides of Butterfield Stage Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the north and just south of Calle Chapos to the south. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase II builders, but would affect the timing of construction for the improvements identified in Exhibit A to Attachment No. 4 (Ordinance —Third Amendment to Development Agreement). Specific Plan Amendment Planning Application PA15-1664 is a Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. No Specific Plan changes are proposed beyond those necessary for consistency between the proposed Development Agreement Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 17, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended 4-0-1 (Youmans absent) that the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and adopt an Addendum to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. One person from the public spoke to seek additional language to the Specific Plan and Development Agreement Amendments regarding a temporary barricade to be placed at the project boundary on Nicolas Road. This speaker also had questions regarding the purpose of the City constructing Butterfield Stage Road Phase III and the definition of "good faith effort' in relation to obtaining agency permits for the construction of Nicolas Road. Staff has add the requested language to the Specific Plan and Development Agreement Amendment documents to clarify that the barricade is to remain in place until the entire road construction is completed, and Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works, responded to the questions relating to Butterfield Stage Road and the intent behind the "good faith effort' language in the Specific Plan and Development Agreement Amendments at the Planning Commission hearing. No Conflicts Europa Vineyard Estates is located on approximately 290.7 acres southesterly of Butterfield Stage Road and La Serena Way in unincorporated Riverside County. It is owned by Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, and is adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road. Neither Mayor Mike Naggar nor Council Member Jeff Comerchero has any direct investments or ownership interests in the Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC. The managing member of Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, is Mr. Daniel Stephenson. Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero do, however, have ownership interests and are members other limited liability companies that are developing property outside of the City of Temecula in which Mr. Stephenson is also the managing member. Europa Vineyard Estates is, therefore, an "otherwise related business entity" for these officials within the meaning of 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18703.1. Tract Map 32594 for the Europa Vineyard Estates Project was approved by the County of Riverside in September 2006 following the City Council's approval of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Agreement in December 2002. One of the County's conditions of approval requires the owners of Europa Vineyard Estates to improve a portion of Butterfield Stage Road along its westerly property line prior to the County's issuance of a certificates of occupancy for homes on 80% of the lots in the Project. The City Attorney has determined that Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero may participate in the Council's approval of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan. These actions will have no material financial effect, indeed no effect, on Europa Vineyard Estates, or the owners of this Project, for the simple reason that the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan do not change the Roripaugh Ranch Developers' obligation to construct the Phase 3 Improvements to Butterfield Stage Road from what has been required since approval of the original Development Agreement and Specific Plan in December 2002. This is consistent with the Fair Political Practices Commission Legal Staff's March 2008 opinion (A-08-015) allowing Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero's participation in a decision to acquire property located 372 feet south of Europa Villages Estates necessary for the construction of the Phase 3 Improvements. Additionally, the funding for the Phase 3 Improvements for Butterfield Stage Road has been in place since the Roripaugh Ranch Community Facilities District 03-02 issued community facilities district special tax bond in April 2006. Despite the City Attorney's opinion that Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero may participate in the approval of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan, Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero have chosen not to participate in any discussion of the Phase 3 Improvements to Butterfield Stage Road and will abstain from the approval of those components of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map 2. Resolution — EIR Addendum Exhibit A — EIR Addendum No. 2 3. Resolution — Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A —Amendment No. 2 to the RRSP 4. Ordinance—Third Amendment to the Development Agreement Exhibit A —Third Amendment to Development Agreement 5. Planning Commission Staff Report (February 17, 2016) 6. City Council Public Hearing City of Temecula PA 14-0051 P. ;`- 177 r a a� .. •..... ................. .� .w ` Pro'ect Site 1 MURR/FTq HO?SpR/NGs h 1 yl IN r. 7 'l [ Y. CALLE CHAPOS O 3 t,.`t - { VISTA DE"ORO v\S �DEL MOST 0 500 1,000 Feet This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessors ' Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside f County.The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility forthe f NORTH information contained on this map.Data and information represented on this map are s bject to update and modification.The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. Geographic Information Systems RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 97121030) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. In November and December 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, along with other land use entitlements, and a 10-year Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project. At that time, the City certified a comprehensive Final Environmental Impact Report State, State Clearinghouse No. 97121030 ("EIR"), to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for all of the land use approvals and the development agreement for the Project. In April 2013, the City prepared Addendum No. 1 to that EIR for a proposed 15-year extension to the Development Agreement from 2013 to 2028. B. The Development Agreement and the Specific Plan provide that the issuance of building permits for Phase II buildings are conditioned upon the completion of design and construction of certain Public Improvements. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan would modify the schedule and building permit "trigger points" or "building permit thresholds" for various public improvements related to development in Phase II of the Roripaugh Project (collectively the "Amendments"). The Owners of the Phase II Properties have requested modifications to the infrastructure implementation schedule to be able to install them in a more cost effective and efficient manner based on current market conditions. C. Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City of Temecula, California, State Clearinghouse No. 97121030 ("Addendum No. 2") addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Amendments. D. The City has caused an Addendum No. 2 ("Addendum") to be prepared for the Amendments in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Amendments do not require the preparation of a new or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164. E. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to a final EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164. F. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 2 in conjunction with the EIR and Addendum No. 1. G. On February 17, 2016 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, and proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 16-06 recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) be approved. H. On March 8, 2016 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council. I. The City Council has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that they are based upon substantial evidence that has been presented to the City Council in the record of proceedings. The documents, staff reports, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination during normal business hours in City Hall through the office of the Director of Community Development, who serves as the custodian of these records. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the contents of Addendum No. 2 prior to deciding whether to approve the Amendments. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council finds and determines that Addendum No. 2 is the appropriate environmental document to analyze the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan ("Amendments") because: A. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendments that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendments are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and C. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendments will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR: (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts Addendum No. 2 which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero did not participate in the discussion of concerning Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 and abstained with respect to the action on this particular item. While neither has any ownership or investment interests in Europa Village Estates adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road at this location, it is an otherwise related entity to them as further described in the Staff Report PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 8th day of March, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA (SCH# 97121030) ,.�.•'1+a' , --- - ate` - - - - _ t. fi C rov Prepared for: Stuart Fisk City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Prepared by: Kent Norton, AICP LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 LSA Final January 27, 2016 Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 B. ADDENDUM DOCUMENTATION ........................................................................ 1 C. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 2 D. APPROVED PROJECT........................................................................................ 2 E. PREVIOUS OR RELATED ACTIVITY.................................................................. 5 F. ADDENDUM NO. 1 .............................................................................................. 5 G. PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 2 ......................................................................... 6 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................... 21 I. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................... 26 J. REFERENCES AND SOURCES........................................................................ 26 APPENDICES A. RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN B. RORIPAUGH RANCH DRAFT EIR C. RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL EIR AND MMRP D. RORIPAUGH RANCH EIR ADDENDUM NO. 1 E. WINE COUNTRY EIR AND ORIGINAL RORIPAUGH EIR TRAFFIC STUDY EXCERPTS Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In late 2002, the City of Temecula approved a 10-year Development Agreement as part of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. At that time, the City certified a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. In April 2013, the City prepared Addendum No. 1 to that EIR for a proposed 15-year extension to the Development Agreement from 2013 to 2028. That action did not create or result in any new or different environmental impacts identified in the EIR, and was needed to continue implementation of the Specific Plan, Community Facilities District, and planned improvements for the Roripaugh project. The site was already rough graded and a number of permanent improvements were already installed, including roads, retaining walls, and a recreation center in the Panhandle area. Extension of the development agreement allowed for completion of necessary infrastructure improvements associated with the Roripaugh project. Addendum No. 2 proposes to modify the schedule and building permit "trigger points" for various public improvements related mainly to development in the "pan" portion of the Roripaugh project. The developer has requested modifications to the infrastructure implementation schedule to be able to install them in a more cost effective and efficient manner based on current market conditions. This addendum addresses potential environmental impacts that would result from these requested infrastructure timing changes. A. INTRODUCTION The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), State Clearinghouse No. 97121030, for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan ("RRSP") was certified by the City of Temecula ("City") on December 17, 2002 to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). As part of that action, the City, as the Lead Agency under CEQA, approved a Development Agreement ("DA") that stipulated impact fee limits in exchange for the private construction of various public improvements (e.g., fire station, regional roadways, etc.). The most recent amendment to the RRSP occurred in March 2003 and the DA was authorized for a 10-year period which was set to expire in November 2013. Prior to its expiration, the City Council approved a fifteen year extension to assure that the identified improvements were constructed in an efficient and equitable fashion by local developers as development occurred after 2013. That DA extension was addressed in EIR Addendum No. 1. The proposed EIR Addendum No. 2 is intended to slightly modify the implementation schedule of various infrastructure improvements. B. ADDENDUM DOCUMENTATION When a lead agency has already prepared an EIR, CEQA mandates that "no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or any responsible agency, unless one or more of the following occurs: (a) substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report; (b) substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions to the environmental impact report; or (c) new information, which was not known or could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available." (Cal. Pub. Res. Code Section 21166). State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 clarifies that a subsequent EIR or supplemental EIR is only required when "substantial changes" occur to a project or the circumstances surrounding a project, or "new information" about a project implicates "new significant environmental effects" or a"substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects" (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162). Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 2 When only minor technical changes or additions to a previous EIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 calling for preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR have occurred, CEQA allows the lead agency to prepare and adopt an addendum to the previously approved EIR [State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b)]. In this case, the City of Temecula, as the Lead Agency, has decided to prepare an Addendum to the RRSP EIR for modification to the implementation schedule of various infrastructure improvements identified within the existing Development Agreement because this action will not create or result in any new or different environmental impacts identified in the RRSP EIR. C. PROJECT BACKGROUND The Roripaugh Ranch project is located in the eastern portion of the City of Temecula, just west of the Temecula Wine Country area, off of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, as shown in the attached exhibit from the RRSP EIR ("Figure 2"). For reference, the long narrow portion of the project just south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of Butterfield Stage Road is referred to as the "panhandle" while the "valley" portion covers the southeastern portion of the site. This property had been farmed for many years by the Roripaugh family, and planning for development on approximately 800 acres of this property began around 1995. In 1997, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, but it was almost six years later (late 2002) before final approval was given for the Specific Plan and certification of the EIR. Subsequent to approval of the Specific Plan and EIR, the site was rough graded and temporary erosion control/water quality improvement installed, but no development has occurred on the site due to the economic downturn that started in 2007. The RRSP was officially approved on March 25, 2003 but has been amended several times with the latest amended version approved on February 14, 2006. The DA was first approved on October 21, 2003 and amended on February 14, 2006 and April 23, 2013. However, there have been a number of "operating memoranda" for implementation of the DA by several specific builders, the last one being approved on January 25, 2011 (6th Operating Memorandum). Several administrative Specific Plan Amendments were also approved since the Specific Plan was originally adopted, and the CEQA documents prepared for these amendments were "conformity" findings tiered off the original EIR approval, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, Residential Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan. The City first circulated a Draft EIR for public review on this project on June 1, 1999. After various project changes and a series of public comments, a Revised Draft EIR was circulated on June 8, 2001 and a 2nd Revised Draft EIR was circulated on April 1, 2002. The Final EIR for the project was certified by Resolution 02-111 in late December 2002 and the Notice of Determination for the EIR was filed on December 17, 2002. D. APPROVED PROJECT The approved RRSP allows the development of 2,015 residential units on 804.7 acres, including 1,056 low and low medium density single family units, and 959 medium density single family units. The RRSP also allows development of 15.4 acres (110,000 square feet) of commercial uses, a 22-acre elementary school site, a 20-acre middle school site, a 5.1-acre neighborhood park, a 19.7-acre community park with lighted athletic fields, 9.1 acres of private recreational facilities, 202.7 acres of biological habitat (mainly in the Santa Gertrudis Creek area), 56.6 acres of flood control and landscaped slopes, and a 2-acre fire station. At buildout, the project would have a gross density of 2.5 units per total acre and a net density of 4.88 units per residential acre. The project proposed to construct a number of improvements, including regional and local roads such as Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and Nicolas Road, and several major utility lines. The approved land use plan for the RRSP is shown in EIR Figure 2-1 (attached). Final January 27, 2016 12— 9-97: 6=32PM:CIty Of Temecula :909e946477 Yc 14/ 17 i !1 H - c� El ft 79 MURRIETA NOT l� SPRINGS ROAD �1 • 1 TA ...... ANO m 11 WAY z fi o r ci fl c,F,� rn i Tq 11 H 15 o It � - li VICINITY MAP RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN - EIR City of Temecula Figure 2 I I ' A6N6YUSA.LLC FIGURE 2-1 1 q 1 a) oo D v o ' M.0 PROPERTY-.,_\ \ ---- ----- __ __ __ -_ ��� M`RR1ET 8 / l M 1M MP PrNN4 995AC __. ^ NOT 12fi AC // L081 } 19.0 AC Dus 95 ous 5 4A $eRs / s.e °1ovs s�i6lc p A ,111 1e.4AC �c es ntrs s,iAC 195AC 4B ROAO 13 �/� os2 44.9 ACJ 100 Dues ❑Jt os1LM VI y !u 11�]S O ! 1T9.9 AC F _ M2 � �11 063 7A 1e.5Ac 1R �o I 12 NAP A 842 LEGEND ° 338 m 142 ous 17 LM ' LAND USE CODE ACRES DENSITY UNITS __.2a nc�:_ lMs i72 DU5 D LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L 107.6 1.1 117 0 254Ac p LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LM 194.8 4.8 939 NICOLAS � 1M24 1F5 s Ous ®MED.DENSITY RES.(Standard) M1 21.5 57 122 t C 13.5 AC 14.1 AC ' ®MED.DENSITY RES.(Clustered Courtyard) M2 68.9 9.4 8.37 r 33A o° Ise Ac O62) 15°DVS ®NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL NC 154 11.1 AC 151 Ovs NEIGHBORHOOD PARK NP 5.1 / 1s Du•s / 30 i SPORTS PARK SP 19.7 ---� ti K 430 18 ®PRIVATE MINI PARK MP .3 H ®PRIVATE RECREATION CENTER RC 9.2 Looe 25.1 Ac EDUCATIONAL(Schools) St,S2 32.0 113 Ou•s IM PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL(Fire Station) PI 2.0 0 HABITAT OSI 2027. 31 FLOOD CONTROL OS2 39.1 M2 2s 5 AC 19 ®LANDSCAPE SLOPES(Manufactured Slopes) OS3 21.2 �4p� L PUBLIC STREETS 35A 31 z AC PRIVATE STREETS 9.B 34 ovs ' GRAND TOTAL 804.7 2.5 2,015 26 22 Ac 24 22 2310sAC 's°s eo sn� LEGEND 20.3AC 5 ]DU'S / �5 1m WE . * 5 2 AC L CALIE 2 ■■ City f County Boundary Pedestrian Bridge ■ L L CIUPOs A21 23.9 AC 30 3 AC -- -- - 24 Dus -- --- - 33 Dvs -- --. _ `32 PI ' 20 AC 1.5 AC) Notes. A 15'wide multi-use trail is located in Planning Areas 19.20 and 21 adjacent to the property boundary. Planning Areas 19,20,21,33A and 33B will have 1 acre minimum lots adjacent to the property boundary ® iTKC and 112 acre minimum lots adjacent to the 1 acre lots. = Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 5 A complete copy of the RRSP is included in Appendix A of this document, the 2nd Revised Draft EIR is included in Appendix B, and the Final EIR, including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP), is included in Appendix C of this document. The most recent circulated Draft EIR is dated April 1, 2002 and the Final EIR is dated September 26, 2002, although the Final EIR was certified in late December 2002 and the Notice of Determination for the EIR was filed on December 17, 2002. The April 2013 Addendum No. 1 to the EIR is attached as Appendix D. E. PREVIOUS OR RELATED ACTIVITY The first approval of the RRSP by the Temecula City Council occurred on December 17, 2002, including the DA. The Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed with the Riverside County Clerk and the appropriate Fish and Game fees were paid on December 18, 2002. The project was not appealed or otherwise legally challenged following filing of the NOD. The final "original' approval of the RRSP occurred on November 26, 2002 by Resolution No. 02-112 and the zoning portion of the RRSP was approved on December 17, 2002 by Ordinance No. 02-13. Since then, there have been several minor (administrative) amendments and the latest amended version was approved on February 14, 2006. At the time the project was approved, approximately 201 acres of the site, most of it along Santa Gertrudis Creek, was set aside under the Assessment District 161 Sub-Regional Habitat Conservation Plan which was later absorbed into a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Conservation Area for the same purpose. Subsequent to approval of the RRSP and EIR, the site was rough graded and erosion control/water quality management improvements were installed on the site except in the habitat conservation area to be preserved along Santa Gertrudis Creek. In addition, roads and a private recreation center were built in the "panhandle" portion of the site just south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. In 2007, development activity began to slow throughout the nation and California, including Temecula and western Riverside County. Development under the RRSP has not proceeded to any appreciable degree to this point, other than development of some roads and a recreation center in the panhandle portion of the site, and the fire station in the valley portion of the site. As of March 2014, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved the Temecula Valley Wine Country Community Plan for the unincorporated land east of the Roripaugh Ranch property. Its EIR (SCH# 2009121076 circulated December 5, 2011) included a cumulative traffic study that took into account more current data on other cumulative development in the eastern Temecula area (including delayed development of the Roripaugh Ranch project). The Development Agreement was amended on April 23, 2013 by Ordinance No. 13-04 to extend its term for 15 years. The DA is needed to assist the project developers to continue installing the various improvements outlined in the DA, including grading, parks, trails, recreation buildings, walls, infrastructure, etc. F. ADDENDUM NO. 1 The City and the developers involved in various portions of the Roripaugh Ranch project (e.g., Van Daele, Standard Pacific, KB Homes) had mutually agreed to extend the DA for the project for another 15 years to assure completion of the various improvements specified in the DA, in exchange for impact fee amounts to remain as indicated in the approved DA. The DA was scheduled to expire in November 2013, and the amended DA would run from November 2013 through November 2028. No physical aspects of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan project were proposed to change as a result of that action. Addendum No. 1 determined the proposed changes would not increase or change the extent of any environmental impacts or mitigation measures identified in the RRSP EIR. New development Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 6 under the RRSP would still have to comply with all existing laws and regulatory programs in place at the time development occurs, other than certain specific fee items exempted by the DA, such as the Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)for Western Riverside County. G. PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 2 The proposed EIR Addendum No. 2 is intended to slightly modify the implementation schedule of various required infrastructure improvements to better match the expected phasing of development based on current market conditions. Table A summarizes the various project improvements with their approved and proposed implementation schedules, along with the party responsible for implementing the improvement. The following figure shows the locations of the proposed infrastructure improvements outlined in Table A. The potential impacts of these proposed changes are evaluated in Section H that follows. Specific Plan Amendment(SPA)and Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) The owners of the properties located in the Phase 2 portion of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (e.g., Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC and Wingsweep Corporation) propose to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement and portions of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. These changes would allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements (identified in Table A of this document) which are required by the existing approvals for the Phase 2 area of Roripaugh Ranch. The areas of the Specific Plan affected by the proposed modifications are generally situated along both sides of Butterfield Stage Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the north and just south of Calle Chapos to the south. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase 2 builders, but would affect the timing of construction for the improvements identified in Table A of this document. Proposed changes to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan include only those changes necessary for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 7 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 Complete Butterfield Stage Complete Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 The City shall construct the 1' Acquire all right-of-way, complete engineering Road Phase 3 improvements prior to issuance of 1St Butterfield Stage Road design,and construct Butterfield Stage Road improvements prior to Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 3 improvements Phase 3 to the intersection with Rancho issuance of 1St Building Phase 2, excluding the installation of using Remaining CFD California Road. Construction will include Permit in Roripaugh Ranch center median landscaping for Butterfield Funds, excluding the intersection and traffic signal improvements at Phase 2. Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and installation of landscaping Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Phase 3. Complete center median for Butterfield Stage Road, Road and landscaping of the center medians landscaping improvements for Butterfield Phase 1, Phase 2, and of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Landscaping and Phase 3 improvements. When Phase 3 prior to the issuance of the 500th improvements for Butterfield appropriate warrants are met, Owners of Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Stage Road Phase 1, Phase Phase 2 shall contribute a fair share Phase 2. 2, and Phase 3 shall be contribution towards the installation of a traffic constructed by the Owners signal at Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena of Phase 2 Property. Way and related intersection improvements as provided in Section 2.2.6, Phasing of Road Improvements, of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and more specifically, Table 2-3 and Paragraph 4 on page 2-22 of the Specific Plan. Traffic Signal, Road,and Intersection Several interrelated The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 2' Acquisition Fee Thresholds required shall provide cost estimates and fee basis developers of Roripaugh Establish an on and offsite traffic signal, road construction of these traffic to the Director of Public Works for Ranch Phase 2.Shortfall and intersection acquisition fee. The fee signals and other related approval prior to issuance of 1st Building costs to be allocated among amount will be determined by the City based intersection improvements Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. The the owners and developers on cost estimates provided by the owners and prior to 1St Building Permit in City shall collect the approved fee amount as noted in item#18 herein developers of Phase 2 and fees will be Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. at issuance of each Building Permit in below. collected by the City at the time of building However warrants for traffic Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 starting with permit issuance. The City will determine signals will not be met all at the 1St Building Permit. when the improvements are required to be the same time,and all The ultimate signal modifications and installed. The Constructing Party will be improvements are not associated improvements at the Nicolas reimbursed upon acceptance of the needed until majority of units Road and Winchester Road intersection completed improvements by the City. The in Phase 2 are constructed shall be operational prior to the issuance owners and developers of Phase 2 shall be and/or schools or Sports of the 26th Building Permit in Roripaugh responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. Park are in operation. Ranch Phase 2. The on and offsite traffic signals, roads,and The timing of the installation for the intersections to which the Acquisition Fee will remaining traffic signals and intersection be applied are: improvements shall be as determined by Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 8 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility the City Director of Public Works, and • Butterfield Stage Road and shall not be an unreasonable time- Murrieta Hot Springs Road schedule. • Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas The Constructing Party will be reimbursed Road upon acceptance of the completed • Butterfield Stage Road and Calle improvements by the City. The owners Chapos and developers shall be responsible to • Nicolas Road at Winchester Road cover the cost of any shortfall. Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to Several interrelated 1. Offsite Segment(Calle The current owners and 3' the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection Thresholds originally Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection to developers of Roripaugh Complete engineering design and construct required construction of Phase 2 Boundary). The owners and Ranch Phase 2. Shortfall full Nicolas Road improvements from Nicolas Road in phases, developers of Phase 2 shall submit costs to be allocated among Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle with some phases to be complete engineering design plans, the owners and developers Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection. constructed prior to Building including initial application for as noted in item#18 herein Permit issuance in Resource Agency permits and below. The City will use the remaining CFD funds, Roripaugh Ranch Phase 1. RCFC&WCD approvals,for approval after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road The Thresholds were by the City Director of Public Works Phase 3, to construct the improvements from subsequently modified prior to issuance of the 1St Building NOTE:this is a City- the approved plan as a City-sponsored project through Operating Permit in RVR Phase 2. sponsored project but not a (but not a separate project under CEQA). The Memorandum. 2. The owners and developers of Phase separate project under owners and developers of Phase 2 shall be 2 shall make good faith efforts to CEQA because the responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. The full completion of utility, improvements and their The owners and developers of Phase 2 will be drainage,flood control, acquire any required regulatory p g agency permits/approvals on behalf impacts were already required, on behalf of the City,to provide for bridge and intersection evaluated in the Draft EIR. all required engineering design, construction improvements necessary for of the City, together with the Santa Only the responsibility for plans, CEQA analysis& Processing, the roadway connection was Gertrudis Creek Channel constructing the environmental measures,mitigation right-of- required to be completed Improvements downstream of the g g 1st p existing culverts at Butterfield Stage improvements is changing. way acquisition, and to obtain all necessary prior to the 1 Building agency Road regulatory age Resource Agency and Riverside County Flood Permit in Roripaugh Ranch permits/approvals e a package, to Control and Water Conservation District Phase 2. allow for start of the City-sponsored permits. Costs of design, mitigation, project project prior to issuance of the 200th management and construction will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds,with Building Permit in RVR Phase 2. If, priority to the costs of construction. Costs of however, the owners and developers of Phase 2 are unsuccessful in right-of-way acquisition will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds upon obtaining the required regulatory completion of the required acquisition. The agency permits/approvals within a approved plan shall include all utility, reasonable timeframe to allow orderly Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 9 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility drainage,flood control, bridge,and development of Roripaugh Ranch intersection improvements necessary for the Phase 2, the owners and developers roadway connection. of Phase 2 may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of Resource Agency permits for Nicolas Road additional sequential phases of 100 from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Building Permits, up to a total 522 Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection were not Building Permits prior to obtaining the obtained with the Resource Agency permits required regulatory agency permits/ for Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2, and the approvals.After 50 of each additional improvements are off site. Due to Resource phase of 100 Building Permits have Agency regulations, Nicolas Road from been issued, the Director of Public Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Works shall determine, using Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection should be ordinary and reasonable criteria, if combined with the permits for the Santa sufficient progress has been made in Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements obtaining the regulatory agency downstream of the existing culverts at approvals for the City to issue the Butterfield Stage Road and processed and next additional phase of Building obtained as a single package. Permits. 3. City shall construct Nicolas Road Upon review of final design plans and from the western Project boundary to estimates by the City, the City shall determine Calle Girasol Owners of Phase 2 a Security Amount corresponding to the then Property shall construct Nicolas Road current engineering cost estimates plus Improvements from Butterfield Stage design, mitigation and right-of-way acquisition Road to western Project boundaries costs, costs of construction and contingencies as described in this Section with the for both the Nicolas Road Improvements as Park-n-Ride/Equestrian Staging described in this Section and the Santa Area,which is required to be Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements constructed prior to the 1 st building associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. permit for Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. Owners of Phase 2 Property shall post a letter Owners of the Phase 2 Property shall of credit with the City, in a form reasonably construct a barricade and turn- acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount around acceptable to the Fire of the Security Amount. The City shall Department on Nicolas Road at the release the letter of Credit upon the boundary of the Phase 2 Property. occurrence of one of the following events: (1) Completion of the construction of both the Nicolas Road Improvements and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 10 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility associated with the Nicolas Road crossing as required by this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director or Public Works; or(2) additional proceeds from new CFD bonds are approved and available so that the Remaining CFD Funds are sufficient to complete both the Nicolas Road Improvements and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. After determination of the Security Amount, any Remaining CFD Funds in excess of the Security Amount may then be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash channel improvements. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Essentially the Thresholds, 1. The owners and developers of The current owners and 4' Improvements as previously modified by Phase 2 shall submit complete developers of Phase 2. Construct the improvements upstream and Operating Memorandum, engineering design plans, including Shortfall,with costs downstream of the existing culverts at require construction of initial application for Resource allocated as noted in item Butterfield Stage Road from the plans Santa Gertrudis Creek Agency permits and RCFC&WCD #18 herein below. approved by RCFC&WCD. Both upstream Channel Improvements prior approvals,for approval by the City and downstream improvements must be to issuance of 1St Building Director of Public Works prior to constructed concurrently. Permit in Roripaugh Ranch issuance of the 1St Building Permit Phase 2. in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, above the 2. The owners and developers of Security Amount determined by the City for Phase 2 shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol improvements may be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek regulatory agency permits/ channel improvements. approvals, together with the Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stacie Road Permanent Maintenance of the Santa to the Calle Girasol/ Nicolas Road Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements shall Connection regulatory agency be the responsibility of RCFCWCD. permits/approvals as a package, prior to issuance of the 200 th City of Temecula,as the underlying property Building Permit within the owner,will cooperate to remove the existing Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. If, Restrictive Covenant on the land, and to grant however, the owners and fee ownership to RCFCWCD for Permanent developers of Phase 2 are unsuccessful in obtaining the Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 11 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility Maintenance. required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a Resource Agency permits for the Santa reasonable timeframe to allow Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements orderly development of the downstream of the existing culverts at Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 Butterfield Stage Road were not obtained with property, the owners and the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh developers of Phase 2 may petition Ranch Phase 2,and the improvements are off the Director of Public Works to site. Due to Resource Agency regulations, allow issuance of additional the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel sequential phases of 100 Building Improvements permits downstream of the Permits for the Roripaugh Ranch existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road Phase 2 property, up to a total of should be combined with the permits for 522 Building Permits within the Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stacie Road to Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 property the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection prior to obtaining the required and processed and obtained as a single regulatory agency package. permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 Building Permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of Building Permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 property. Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements Several interrelated The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 5' Construct the Long Valley Wash Channel Thresholds required the shall construct Long Valley Wash developers of Phase 2,with Improvements from the plans approved by design, maintenance Channel Improvements prior to issuance costs allocated as noted in RCFC&WCD and/or City of Temecula. agreements, CLOMR/LOMR of the 1St Building Permit in a Planning item#18 herein below. Construction shall include the bridge processes and/or Area draining into the channel(PA-17— abutments for the Pedestrian Bridge. construction of components 31). of Long Valley Wash Remaining CFD funds above the Security Channel Improvements prior Amount determined by the City for Nicolas to rough grading, Building Road/Calle Girasol improvements may be Permits and/or occupancy of Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 12 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility applied to Long Valley Wash channel units. Essentially, improvements. construction of the Channel Improvements were required Permanent Maintenance of the Long Valley prior to the 1St Building Wash Channel Improvements shall be the Permit in Roripaugh Ranch responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase Phase 2 2 HOA(s), or other maintenance entity approved by the City of Temecula. Water Quality Improvement Plans(WQMP) Submittal of a WQMP to the The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 6' As needed, each Party shall submit a WQMP RWQCB was required prior shall each submit WQMP Amendments developers of Phase 2, Amendment covering its ownership to the to the issuance of any covering their respective ownership to the individually by Planning SDRWQCB and City for review and comment. grading permit. A WQMP SDRWQCB and City for review and Area. The WQMP Amendments shall address both for Roripaugh Ranch Phase comment prior to any additional approval construction and occupancy of the project. 2 was submitted, but of plans, issuance of permits,and/or The amended WQMPs shall be implemented submittal of Amendments grading of each Party's site. to the satisfaction of the City Public Works should be required by the Department. City prior to any additional approval of plans, issuance of permits, and/or grading of each Party's site. Remaining Public Improvements& Completion of public The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and �' Landscaping—Malor Roadways improvements on the listed shall each complete the public developers of Phase 2, The owners of Phase 2 Property shall major roadways were improvements and landscaping including individually by Planning complete the public improvements, including addressed through specific sidewalk, parkway landscaping, raised Area. sidewalks, parkway landscaping, raised Building Permit Thresholds landscaped median landscaping, landscaped median landscaping, perimeter for each major roadway. perimeter walls and street lighting, walls and street lighting, along the frontage of adjacent to their frontage on major major roadways adjacent to each Planning roadways, to the satisfaction of the Public Area, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Works Director, prior to the issuance of Director. This requirement will pertain to the the 1St Building Permit in each adjacent following major roadways: Planning Area and/or Tract Map. • Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road • Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street) • Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) • Nicolas Road • North Loop Road Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 13 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility • South Loop Road In the event that sidewalks along the above streets are not continuous,each Party shall provide an all-weather pedestrian path of travel to ensure continuous pedestrian circulation. Permanent Maintenance of Parkway No Current Building Permit The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 8' Landscaping—Landscape Maintenance Thresholds. shall each submit a Landscape developers of Phase 2. Master Plan Maintenance Master Plan for its Although originally intended to be maintained ownership to the Community by the TCSD, permanent maintenance of Development Director for review and slopes and parkways along the frontage of comment prior to the 1 St Building Permit in major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 each Planning Area and/or Tract Map. shall be the responsibility of Home Owners Association(s)to be formed. The owners and developers of Phase 2 shall each prepare and submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan to the Community Development Director for review and comment covering all public and private open space areas, parks, slopes, parkways, etc., and especially slopes and parkways along their frontage on major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2,which will not be maintained by individual commercial or residential property owners. The Landscape Maintenance Master Plan(s)shall show the locations of any necessary water meters and electrical meters, together with the permanent maintenance entity for each area. North and South Loop Roads—Complete Several interrelated The current owners and 9. 1. The owners of Phase 2 property Engineering and Landscape Architectural Thresholds required developers of Phase 2,with Design construction of North and shall complete engineering design of costs allocated as noted in Complete engineering and landscape South Loop Roads the North and South Loop Roads, item#18 herein below. architectural design as public roadways,with improvements prior to 1St and a Phasing Plan for construction • narrow roadway pavement widths Building Permit in Roripaugh of the roads tdevelopment, allow for orderly , and submit for Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 14 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility consistent with current City design Ranch Phase 2. However approval to the Public Works criteria, the Thresholds anticipated Director prior to the issuance of the • traffic calming measures including design of the North and 1St Building Permit in Phase 2. measures to address traffic to/from South Loop Roads to 2. The owners of Phase 2 property Sports Park(PS27), Secondary include private gates and shall complete landscape School (PA 28)and Elementary private road segments that architectural design of the North and School (PA 29)such as a traffic are no longer favored by the South Loop Roads and submit for round-about on the North Loop City or Developer, and that approval to the Community Road easterly of PA 29, precluded unique character Development Director prior to the • water quality measures addressing and visual appeal, and are issuance of the 1St Building Permit in runoff from the roadway pavement now inconsistent with Phase 2. and parkway areas, current City design criteria. • areas with widened parkways, meandering sidewalks or trails, variations in wall locations and type, or other design features intended to create unique character and visual appeal, • a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development of Phase 2. Submit design to the Public Works Director and Community Development Director for approval. Sports Park(PA 27)—Complete Design& Current Thresholds require The current owners and 10. 1. Prior to the issuance of the 1st Construction and Maintenance Agreement completion of the Sports developers of Phase 2,with Update design of the Sports Park with Park prior to the 700th total Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch costs allocated on the basis • water quality measures addressing Building Permit in Roripaugh Phase 2, the owners and of the City of Temecula's runoff from impervious areas and Ranch. developers of Phase 2 shall update typical parks fee incorporating LID BMPs, in the Sports Park design,and submit methodology. accordance with the amended plans for approval to the WQMP, Community Services and Public • unnecessary turf areas converted Works Directors- to drought tolerant plant materials, 2. The owners and developers of • fescue turf soccer fields converted Phase 2 shall construct the Sports to synthetic turf, Park and the City shall accept the • design of tot lot and playground park, prior to issuance of the 1200th Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 15 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility updated to the latest CPSC Building Permit in Roripaugh standards, Ranch,that number including • proposed site lighting converted to Roripaugh Ranch Phase 1. more efficient LED lighting, • pre-wiring for security cameras for each major use area (parking lot, ball fields, restrooms, etc.)and provision of CCTV system, • approval of the sports field lighting design by the Community Services Director, and if necessary the Riverside County Airport Land Use Authority,with the intent of minimizing the impacts of lighting on the surrounding community, • connection to the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash and potential connection to the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian, and Trailhead facility in PA 33B, • conversion of the proposed ball field to a 90' infield/325' outfield, Submit design to the Community Services Director and Public Works Director for approval. Private Recreation Center(PA 30)—Use Current Thresholds require The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 11. Analysis, Design Development, and completion of a private shall perform a recreational use analysis, developers of Phase 2,with Construction and Maintenance Agreement recreation center on design development, and submit to the costs allocated as noted in Perform a recreational use analysis to guide Planning Area 30 prior to the Community Development Director for item#18 herein below. design development of the Private Recreation 800th total Building Permit in approval prior to the 1 st Building Permit in Center, optimum location within Roripaugh Roripaugh Ranch. Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. Prior to the Ranch Phase 2,and to form the basis for fair issuance of the 300th the schedule for share construction and maintenance fiscal completion of construction of the Private contribution decisions by The owners and Recreation Center shall be approved by developers of Phase 2. the Director of Community Development. Perform design development based on the recreational use analysis and submit to the Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 16 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility Community Development Director for approval. Design development drawings and documents must be sufficient to understand recreational uses, conceptual architecture, construction costs and maintenance/operational costs. Permanent maintenance of the Private Recreation Center shall be the responsibility of the HOA(s). Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash Current Thresholds require RVR shall construct the Pedestrian Bridge RVR, individually. 12. Construct the Pedestrian Bridge over Long completion of the Pedestrian prior to issuance of the 75th Building Valley Wash. Bridge abutments to be Bridge prior to the 75th Permit for PAs 22, 23,and 24. constructed with Long Valley Wash channel building permit for PAs 22, construction. 23, and 24. Multi-Use Trail in PAs 19, 20, &21 —Design Current Thresholds require The owners and developers of Phase 2 Costs allocated in the future 13. Development completion of the Multi-Use shall perform design development of the based on Planning Area Perform design development of the 15'wide Trail prior to the 1St Building Multi-Use Trail and submit to the ownership(i.e.trail costs Multi-Use Trail intended to provide a trail in Permit in PAs 19, 20, and Community Development Director for within each Planning Area PA 21 and PA 22 along their southerly 21. approval prior to issuance of the 1 st will be borne by the owner of boundary, then crossing Long Valley Wash to Changed conditions warrant Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch that Planning Area). connect to PA 19 and along its easterly a more comprehensive Phase 2. boundary, and connecting to properties to the analysis and design of trail east. Due to changed conditions, trail access access throughout The Multi-Use Trail may be constructed in into PA 13 has been precluded, crossing of Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. phases, in accordance with the approved Long Valley Wash may only be accomplished Design. In each Planning Area, the Multi- at the easterly Loop Road crossing and Use Trail shall be constructed prior to introduction of the Wine Country Sewer issuance of the 1St Building Permit provides additional opportunity for alternate (excluding Model Home permits) in the trail alignment. Planning Area. Design development shall include: • measures to screen onsite and offsite homes from the trail on an "as-needed" basis; • measures to provide for safe crossing at the easterly Loop Road crossing of Long Valley Wash; Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 17 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility • consideration of connection to properties to the east at Calle Contento, in the alignment of the Wine Country Sewer, as opposed to an alignment through PA 19 to connect to PA 13; • consideration of any potential connection of the trail alignment through PA 21 and PA 22 to properties to the south, or to the west across Butterfield Stage Road, or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities required to be constructed in PA 33B. If safe and reasonably useful connections from PA 21 and PA 22 to such properties or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities cannot be expected, then alternate alignments,such as trail crossing facilities at Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road,and/or use of the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash shall be considered in the design development instead; • a Phasing Plan for construction of the multi-use trail in segments to allow for its early construction as well as orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. Submit design development to the Community Development Director for approval. Permanent Maintenance of the Multi-Use Trail shall be the responsibility of the HOA(s), or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 18 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, Trailhead Original Thresholds require The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 14. in PA 33B the completion of the Park- shall complete design and construct the developers of Phase 2, with Complete design and construct the Park-n- n-Ride in PA 11 Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and costs allocated as noted in Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead (Commercial Use) prior to Trailhead Facilities in accordance with the item#18 herein below. Facilities, in accordance with the approved the 1St Building Permit in approved Multi-Use Trail design Multi-Use Trail design development and the PAs 10, 12, 14 thru 23, and development and the requirements of the requirements of the City. 33A. City, prior to issuance of the 1 St Building Specific Plan Amendment Permit in PAs 10, 12, 14 thru 23 and 33A. Permanent Maintenance of the Park-n-Ride, #2 moved the facility to PA Equestrian Facilities, and Trailhead in PA 33B 33B and added the Prior to issuance of the 1St building permit shall be the responsibility of the HOA(s), or as requirement for an in PAs 10, 12, 14 thru 23 and 33A, the determined in the Landscape Maintenance Equestrian Staging owners and developers of Phase 2 shall Master Plans. Maintenance of the sites for Area/Trail Head, but did not also complete the design and construction Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and specify a revised Threshold. of the portion of Nicolas Road from Trailhead Facilities and the facilities during Butterfield Stage Road to the MWD construction shall be the responsibility of the easement, including necessary temporary Owners of Phase 2. turn-around geometrics to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The design and construction of this portion of Nicolas Road must be coordinated and consistent with the engineering design and construction of Nicolas Road (item#3 of the DAA). Fire Protection Plans Current Thresholds required The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 15. Submit plans for structural protection from submittal of a Fire Protection shall each submit a Fire Protection Plan developers of Phase 2, vegetation fires to the City of Temecula Fire Plan prior to the 1St Building for their respective areas for approval by individually by Planning Department. Permit in Roripaugh Ranch the City of Temecula Fire Department Area. Phase 2. prior to the approval of the Tentative Tract/Parcel Map in each of their Because there are alternate respective ownership. approaches and methods for compliance with City of Temecula guidelines, each Ownership should prepare its own plan. Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 19 Table A: Summary of Roripaugh Ranch Improvements and Implementation Schedule Current Building Modified Building Item Description Permit Threshold Permit Threshold Responsibility 16. Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street)— Several interrelated If not already completed with the The current owners and Complete Improvements Thresholds required construction of the Neighborhood Park developers of Phase 2, with Complete construction of Roripaugh Valley construction of Roripaugh (PA 6), the owners and developers of costs allocated as noted in Road Improvements from Murrieta Hot Valley Road improvements Phase 2 shall complete the Roripaugh item#18 herein below. Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road. in phases: Valley Road Improvements prior to the • Prior to issuance of the 1St Building Permit in PA Roripaugh Valley Road from Murrieta Hot 11. Springs Road to the access for the completion of the Neighborhood Park(PA 6)shall be installed Neighborhood prior to the acceptance of the Neighborhood Park(PA 6) Park by the City. • Prior to 1 st Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2. Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) Improvements Current Thresholds require The owners and developers of Phase 2 The current owners and 1�' —Complete Improvements construction of Fiesta Ranch shall complete the Fiesta Ranch Road developers of Phase 2,with Complete construction of Fiesta Ranch Road Road prior to 1St Building Improvements prior to issuance of the 1St costs allocated as noted in Improvements from Nicolas Road to Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Building Permit in PA 12. item#18 herein below. Roripaugh Valley Road. Phase 2. On-site and Off-site infrastructure Not Applicable Not Applicable As costs are incurred, The 18. improvements and facilities—Proportional Owners of Phase 2 Property Cost Sharing. shall each pay their agreed upon proportional share of Owners of Phase 2 Property shall share the said approved costs. costs to complete the design, planning, government agency permit approvals, RVR's proportionate share construction and implementation of all of the shall be ninety percent On-site and Off-site infrastructure (90%). improvements and facilities per the items above on a proportional basis. Wingsweep's proportionate share shall be ten percent 10% . RVR= Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC Final January 27, 2016 f f } J 'f 7B �. 2D • `0� la Zia 11, 4 4 _ 1F to 1Y •' •cloy RANCHO 9 •.r ID s 9 . . r u �oo C 41 \ 7A .p ®00 Fsaz L S AFIGURE 1 2D:Nicolas Road&Winchester Road 9:North and South Loop Roads- 13B:Multi-Use Trail in PAs 19,20,& 3:Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Complete Engineering and Landscape 21-Design Development aSpecific Plan Boundary Road to Calle Girasol Architechtural Design 13C:Multi-Use Trail in PAs 19,20,& OSite Improvements 4:Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel 10:Sports Park(PA-27)-Complete 21-Design Development Improvements Design&Construction and Mainte14:Park-n-Ride,Equestrian Facilities, nance Agreement 1:Butterfield Stage Road,Phase 3 Tmilhead in PA 33B S:Lang Valley Wash Channel 11:Private Recreation Center(PA-30)- HotButterfield Stage Road&Murrieta Improvements 16:Roripaugh Valley Road('A'Street)- Hot Springs Road UseAnalysis,Design Development, Com lete Im ts 7A:Butterfield Stage Road Const&Maintenance Agreement P provemen 2B:Butterfield Stage Road&Nicolas .�:Nicolas Road 12:Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley 17:Fiesta Ranch Road('B'Street) Road Wash Improvements-Complete 2C:Butterfield Stage Road&Calle 7C:North Loop Road Improvements Chapos 7D:South Loop Road 13A:Multi-Use Trail in PAs 19,20,& General Improvements(Not Shown): 21-Design Development 6:Water Quality Improvements(WQMP) Addendum No.2 8:Permanent Maint.of Parkway Landscaping 1s:Fire Protection Plans Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report SOURCE:Big Becht,,2010;River,i&COavty,2015 Site Improvements I:\TM1J1401\Rep.nt§\EM\fig1 Improve co..xd(5/152015) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 21 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The RRSP EIR identified the following significant and unavoidable environmental impacts as a result of development of the proposed project(FEIR Sections 3.0 and 6.2): 1) Agriculture—loss of prime soils and locally important farmland (project and cumulative); 2) Traffic — two local intersections' exceed Level of Service D during peak hours (project and cumulative); 3) Air Quality—both short-term and long-term criteria air pollutants (project and cumulative); 4) Noise—contributions to cumulative noise levels; and 5) Aesthetics—loss of views and new skyglow conditions (project impacts). In addition, the EIR examined a number of alternatives, as required under CEQA, including: (1) No Project— No Development; (2) Continued Agriculture — Clustered Development; (3) Reduced Density Development; and (4) Rural Density Development (FEIR Section 7.0). Due to the nature of the proposed action relative to the previously approved EIR, the City will not use an Environmental Checklist form (i.e., an Initial Study) to document the potential effects of the action, as suggested in Section 15063 (d)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Rather, the City has conducted a brief but thorough assessment of the 18 different environmental issues analyzed in the RRSP EIR. The primary factor in this assessment is that the proposed action, an extension of the existing development agreement, does not result in any physical changes to the environment that were not already anticipated or analyzed of the EIR, but only: (a) extends the time needed to complete proposed infrastructure in support of new development; (b) makes minor changes to the timing or order of infrastructure improvements; and (c) makes minor modifications to the triggers for completion of the planned improvements. Recent economic conditions have also resulted in a delay in developing the proposed land uses within the RRSP, so the residential development, and its related infrastructure improvements outlined in the RRSP, have not yet been built. This assessment complies with the intent and requirements of CEQA relative to the preparation of an EIR Addendum. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS Agriculture. The site has already been rough graded and is no longer used for agriculture. Whenever development of the site occurs, prime and locally important agricultural soils will be covered over so the impacts are equivalent to those identified in the EIR, which were determined to be significant both at a project level and on a cumulative basis (FEIR pages ES-4 and 3-22). No mitigation was determined to be feasible and these conditions still apply in the project area, so no new mitigation is required or needed. Approval of Addendum No. 2 would not change these conclusions. Traffic. The DEIR determined the project-level and cumulative impacts in this regard to be significant (DEIR pages ES-6 and 3-97). Impacts from traffic both from construction and occupancy of the project have not occurred yet, and approval of Addendum No. 2 would still require completion of the various roadway and intersection improvements identified in the original traffic study. This does not represent a substantial change from the impacts, conclusions, or mitigations identified in the EIR. This conclusion is supported by a more recent comprehensive traffic impact study prepared for the Wine Country Community Plan prepared by Fehr and Peers for Riverside County in 2011 (see discussion below and Appendix E). That study was prepared ten years after the original Roripaugh study (November 2011 versus 2001) and used more current General Plan Buildout estimates. The newer study indicates that cumulative traffic volumes on area roadways would be increased from those identified in the cumulative analysis in the original Roripaugh EIR traffic study (see 1 Ynez Road at Winchester Road and Ynez Road at Rancho California Road Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 22 Table B). However, the EIR already concluded project and cumulative traffic impacts from the Roripaugh project were significant, and the project will still be required to fully mitigate its project-specific impacts and its fair share of cumulative traffic impacts as development occurs. Therefore, the proposed minor modifications to the implementation schedule for various infrastructure improvements do not alter the significance conclusions of the EIR and mitigation is equivalent to that outlined in the EIR. Table B: Comparison of EIR Traffic Studies —Original Roripaugh Project to Wine Country Plan A. Roadway Segment Comparison Butterfield Stage Road Rancho California Road North of West of Rancho California Road Butterfield Stage Road Year/Condition/Source' ADT LOS2 ADT LOS 2011 WCP TIA Existing Conditions (2009)(weekday, Table 4) 4,616 C 14,132 C General Plan Buildout no WCP, Scenario 3, Table 8 13,516 C 17,374 C 2001 RSP TIA Existing Conditions (2000)(Exhibit 3-7) 200 A 11,300 A Year 2003 With Project (Exhibit 4-W) 200 A 12,500 A Year 2007 With Project (Exhibit 4-Y) 8,800 C 19,400 C GP Buildout Without Project (Exhibit 4-Z) 26,400 F 11,600 C GP Buildout With Project Exhibit 4-AA 32,500 F 14,000 C B. Intersection Comparison Butterfield Stage Road Winchester Road At At Rancho California Road Nicolas Road Year/Condition/Source' Dela sec LOS2 Dela sec LOS 2011 WCP TIA Existing Conditions (2009)(weekday, Table 5) >120 F >120 F General Plan Buildout no WCP, Scenario 3, Table 9 >120 F >120 F 2001 RSP TIA(Without Improvements) Existing Conditions (2000)(PM peak, Table 3-1) 36.8 E 36.3 D 2007 Without Project (PM peak, Table 5-3) >120 F 83.6 F 2007 With Project (PM peak, Table 5-4) >120 F >120 F General Plan Buildout Without Project (Table 5-5) 37.3 D 47.9 D General Plan Buildout With Project Table 5-6 61.8 D 38.3 D Data Sources/Abbreviations ADT Average Daily Traffic LOS Level of Service A-F TIA Traffic Im act Assessment sec Seconds of Dela RSP Original Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads dated November 2001 WCP Wine Country Plan-TIA prepared by Fehr& Peers dated November 2011 2 Estimated from WCP TIA Table 1, Intersection and Roadway Segment LOS Criteria. Segments noting LOS C are actually LOS C or better Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 23 On March 11, 2014 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved the Temecula Valley Wine Country Community Plan (WCP) for the unincorporated land east of the Roripaugh Ranch property. The EIR for the WCP (SCH# 2009121076) included a cumulative traffic study with its EIR that took into account the delayed development within the Roripaugh Ranch project. The WCP traffic study included the Roripaugh Ranch in its cumulative projects list for estimating future traffic impacts. The Addendum No. 2, both in terms of the extensions of deadlines and the re-ordering of improvements, will not alter the WCP traffic study conclusions, and constructing the planned improvements later in the future, but still in concert with development as it occurs, will not create any new or significantly different impacts than those identified in the original Roripaugh EIR. According to the WCP traffic study, future development within the RRSP is also consistent with the traffic projections and roadway network outlined in the County's TUMF program and as evaluated in the Wine Country traffic study and EIR (see Appendix E). The extended DA approved under EIR Addendum No. 1 would allow for the efficient implementation of the various road and intersection improvements identified in the DA for 15 years through 2028. Ultimately, all of the roadway and intersection improvements identified in the original EIR will be implemented in conjunction with future development under the RRSP. Since all of the improvements outlined in the original EIR would be implemented, approval of Addendum No. 2 would not change the impact determination or proposed mitigation of the Roripaugh EIR. Air Quality. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be significant (DEIR pages ES-6 and 3-115). Impacts from air quality, both short-term from construction and long-term from occupancy of the project, have not occurred yet, except for rough grading the site. Approval of EIR Addendum No. 1 extended the DA and extended the beginning and ultimate impacts of air emissions from project construction and occupancy into the future. All of this work would occur beyond 2014, which means actual emissions would likely be equivalent to or lower than estimated in the EIR due to improved fleet emission controls and upgraded fuel standards. (i.e., air assessment in original EIR assumed 1998 fleet mix and emission characteristics, while current vehicles would have to comply with the latest emission controls and standards at the time of implementation (currently 2007 or newer). For these reasons, emissions from project construction and operation would be cleaner (i.e. less polluting) than estimated in the original EIR as project implementation is delayed and more stringent air pollution control requirements are in place. In addition, the cumulative list of future development outlined in the original EIR was considerably larger (i.e., more development) than that used in the more recent Wine Country Community Plan traffic study, which would support the assumption that future development under current conditions would be equal or less than that evaluated in the original EIR under cumulative impacts.Therefore, implementation of EIR Addendum No. 2 does not represent a substantial change from the impacts identified in the EIR, and new development would be required to implement current air quality regulations which would help reduce both project and cumulative air pollutant emissions from dust control, etc. Noise. The DEIR concluded that the project would contribute to cumulative noise impacts (DEIR pages ES-8 and 3-165). Long-term noise impacts have not occurred yet, but would be similar to those impacts identified in the EIR once the project is built out. Approval of the previous EIR Addendum No. 1 extended the DA to would extend the beginning and ultimate effect of those impacts to 2028, and all of the improvements outlined in the original traffic study would still be installed under EIR Addendum No. 2, except that the timing of their construction would be modified to better track actual development of the project under current market conditions. The Wine Country traffic study discussed above indicates that area traffic would be equal or less than that originally projected under the original Roripaugh EIR (see Appendix E), so traffic-related noise would also be equal or less than outlined in the original EIR. However, these minor changes do not represent a substantial change from the impacts, mitigation, or conclusions identified in the EIR. Aesthetics. The DEIR concluded that project-level impacts would be significant (DEIR pages ES-11 and 3- 219). Most of the project impacts would occur as identified in the EIR, including views changing and additional skyglow as development occurs. Most of the site is not visible to the public from existing roadways or from existing residential neighborhoods in the surrounding area, other than along Calle Contento to the Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 24 east and Nicolas Road to the southwest. It should be noted that grading for the panhandle portion of the site has already altered views of that area from Nicolas Road in terms of the ridgeline, although no homes have been built along the southern boundary of the panhandle that would be visible from Nicolas Road. None of the minor revisions outlined in Table A will result in any appreciable changes in short-term or long-term views of the project and its related improvements from surrounding areas than what were identified and analyzed in the EIR. Therefore, no additional mitigation is required or needed as a result of the minor infrastructure timing changes proposed under EIR Addendum No. 2. LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS Noise. The DEIR concluded that project-level impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-8 and 3-165). Direct noise impacts both from construction and occupancy of the project have not occurred yet, but would be similar to those impacts identified in the EIR. The Wine Country traffic study discussed above indicates that area traffic would be equal or less than that originally projected under the original Roripaugh EIR (see Appendix E), so traffic-related noise would also be equal or less than outlined in the original EIR. In addition, minor changes to the infrastructure completion schedule would incrementally extend the beginning and ultimate effect of those impacts into the future, but this does not represent a substantial change from the impacts identified in the EIR. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. When the EIR was prepared and approved, an analysis of impacts related to greenhouse gases and global climate change was not required. New development within the City, including Roripaugh Ranch, will be required to comply with the latest California Green Building Code (CGBC) requirements and Title 24 energy conservation standards issued by the State, which will minimize potential greenhouse gas emissions to the extent feasible. In addition, the minor infrastructure implementation changes would cause no physical changes or different impacts from those identified in the EIR, and later implementation of new development under the RRSP would place that development under the more strict building code standards of the CGBC. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required or proposed as part of EIR Addendum No. 2. Hydrology and Water Quality. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-5 and 3-54). The site has already been rough graded, and extension of the DA under EIR Addendum No. 1 allowed for effective implementation of planned improvements to the Roripaugh Ranch property, including drainage improvements along Long Valley Wash and other permanent erosion control and water quality maintenance features throughout the remainder of the site. Implementation of EIR Addendum No. 2 would still tie planned improvements to new development, so the conclusions of the EIR remain unchanged relative to drainage and water quality. Biological Resources. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-7 and 3-140). Impacts to biological resources would be the same as outlined in the EIR, and future development would be required to comply with the Western Riverside County MSHCP including impact fees and preservation of the Santa Gertrudis Creek area, as outlined in the RRSP. Table A indicates that general road and intersection improvements (Item 3) and improvements to Santa Gertrudis Creek (Item 4) might be temporarily delayed if the developer is unable to obtain permits from the regulatory agencies in a timely manner for these improvements. The City would have the discretion to approve an additional 100 units prior to obtaining permits for each of these categories of improvements. However, the roadway/intersection improvements and overall improvements to the creek would still be made as outlined in the original EIR and prior to completion of the Roripaugh project. Due to the disturbed nature of the Phase 2 planned development area, this small change in the timing of improvements would not result in any new of substantially increased impacts to biological resources. This also applies to any improvements that were originally going to be constructed by developers but which the City has chosen to construct instead, because the potential environmental impacts of the improvements themselves were already evaluated in the EIR. Therefore, the minor changes to the infrastructure implementation schedule as a result of EIR Addendum No. 2 would not change the conclusions of the EIR, nor would it require additional mitigation. Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 25 Scientific Resources. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-11 and 3-231). Impacts to paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources would be the same including onsite monitoring of grading by qualified archaeological and paleontological personnel as appropriate as development occurs. Minor changes to the infrastructure implementation schedule would not affect impacts or mitigation identified for archaeological, paleontological, or historical resources. Geology and Soils. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-8 and 3-165). Development under the RRSP would result in the same geologic and soil impacts as identified in the EIR, and would be subject to the same mitigation and the latest Conditions of Approval from the City regarding geotechnical hazards. It was determined that extending the DA under EIR Addendum No. 1 would not result in any significant effects related to geologic or soils constraints. Likewise, minor changes to the infrastructure implementation schedule under EIR Addendum No. 2 would also not result in substantial changes related to these impacts. All future development would also have to comply with the latest state green building code requirements regarding geotechnical hazards, and additional site specific geotech and soil testing and reports are required for specific tentative maps within the specific plan, consistent with Mitigation Measures 1, 2, and 4 in Section 3.3.6 of the original EIR. Therefore, impacts would still be less than significant and no new mitigation is required. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-8 and 3-147). Future development of the site under the RRSP would result in the same number of units, same location of planned uses, same circulation network, and similar impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials as identified in the EIR. Future uses would be subject to the same mitigation in the original EIR as well as the latest Conditions of Approval from the City regarding hazards and hazardous materials. For these reasons, there would be no significant effects related to these issues by making minor changes to the infrastructure implementation schedule proposed under EIR Addendum No. 2. Land Use and Planning. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-4 and 3-15). The revised DA would not alter the number, density, or location of planned uses, and the project would have the same circulation network. Future development would occur on the Roripaugh Ranch site consistent with the land use designations outlined in the RRSP, and the project site has already been rough graded with development pads and roads. Therefore, implementation of the proposed changes to the infrastructure implementation plan would have no demonstrable adverse effect on either land use or planning impacts of the project, and would allow for more effective construction of planned improvements to be tied more closely to the timing of actual development in the future. The addition of new houses and residents to the City will occur at a later time than identified in the EIR, but the magnitude of these impacts will be equivalent to those identified in the EIR. The current City General Plan and Housing Element2 took into account the housing that would occur when the RRSP is built. There would be no significant effects on population and housing by minor changes to the infrastructure implementation plan. Services. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-9, 3-173, 3-175, 3-178, 3-180, 3-185, 3-187, 3-188, 3-189, and 3-190). The service impacts identified in the EIR would still occur, but begin at a later time and extend into the future. No substantial changes are envisioned compared to the impacts identified in the EIR, and the fire station outlined in the current DA has already been built. Utilities. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-10, 3-197, 3-200, 3-201, 3-203, 3-205, and 3-207).The utility impacts identified in 2 Published September 2009 for period July 1,2008 to June 30,2014 Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 26 the EIR would still occur, but begin at a later time and extend into the future. No substantial changes are envisioned compared to the impacts identified in the EIR, and the fire station outlined in the current DA has already been built. Building these pipelines later than originally planned and evaluated in the original EIR would also result in equal or less actual traffic and air quality impacts due a reduced amount of cumulative development currently projected (as in the Wine Country EIR) and more stringent air pollution regulations passed since 2002. Therefore, minor changes to the infrastructure implementation plan, mainly roads but also pipelines within those roads, would not significantly change the anticipated impacts or recommended mitigation measures in the EIR. Mineral and Forest Resources. The DEIR concluded that project-level and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (DEIR pages ES-4 and 3-15). The site does not contain these resources so they are unaffected by changes in infrastructure implementation. I. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on available information and the analysis presented in Section H, making the proposed minor changes to the infrastructure implementation schedule for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan would not increase the severity or extent of any of the identified impacts, would not create any new impacts, nor would it require any new or modified mitigation measures identified in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR, and development within Phase 2 would be required to implement the improvements identified in the EIR, the timing and responsibility of which are outlined in Table A. With implementation of these mitigation measures, no revisions to the EIR are necessary and approval of this addendum will fully comply with the CEQA requirements for this proposed action. J. REFERENCES AND SOURCES Development Agreement 15t Operating Memorandum, October 21, 2004 15t Amendment, February 14, 2006 2nd Operating Memorandum, March 21, 2006 3'd Operating Memorandum, August 31, 2006 4th Operating Memorandum, March 6, 2007 5th Operating Memorandum, October 26, 2010 6th Operating Memorandum,January 25, 2011 Environmental Impact Report Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, City of Temecula. The Keith Companies. June 1, 1999. Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, City of Temecula. The Keith Companies. April 1, 2002. Final Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, City of Temecula. The Keith Companies. September 26, 2002. Addendum No. 1, Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, City of Temecula. Approved by City Council on April 9, 2013. Final January 27, 2016 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula Page 27 Specific Plan Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Keith Companies. Approved on November 26, 2002 by Resolution No. 02-112 with the zoning portion of the RRSP approved on December 17, 2002 by Ordinance No. 02-13. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, Matthew Fagan Consulting Services. December 2004. Wine Country Community Plan Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country Community Plan, Riverside County, CA. Fehr&Peers. November 2011. Final January 27, 2016 Rorpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula APPENDIX A RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 (December 2004) Specific Plan Document Volume 1 (Approved November 2002) Specific Plan Appendices Volume 2 (Approved November 2002) Final January 27, 2016 AVAILABLE FROM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPON REQUEST Rorpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula APPENDIX B RORIPAUGH RANCH DRAFT EIR (April 1, 2002) Final January 27, 2016 AVAILABLE FROM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPON REQUEST Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula APPENDIX C RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL EIR AND MMRP Final January 27, 2016 AVAILABLE FROM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPON REQUEST Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula APPENDIX D RORIPAUGH RANCH EIR ADDENDUM NO. 1 Final January 27, 2016 AVAILABLE FROM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPON REQUEST Rorpaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum No. 2 City of Temecula APPENDIX E WINE COUNTRY EIR AND ORIGINAL RORIPAUGH EIR TRAFFIC STUDY EXCERPTS Final January 27, 2016 Il t v r 4 u FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WINE COUNTRY COMMUNITY PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA PREPARED FOR: Riverside County PREPARED BY: 3850 Vine Street Suite 140 Riverside,CA 92507-4225 F E H R P E E R S p 951-274-4800 f951-684-4324 November 2011 Yrs m Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine County orrrmunity pla�t November 2011 o The model was used to forecast Scenario 3 and Scenario 4 forecasts. Adjustments were made to the model forecast volumes by applying "the difference method," which utilizes the model to forecast the growth on a particular roadway segment and adds that growth to the existing traffic volume. This procedure is consistent with forecasting guidance provided in the NCHRP 255 guidance on adjusting travel demand forecast volumes. TABLE 2-ROADWAY SEGMENT THRESHOLDS Number of Maximum Two-Way Traffic Volume(ADT)(2) Roadway Classification Lanes LOS C LOS D LOS E Collector 2 10,400 11,700 13,000 Secondary 4 20,700 23,300 25,900 Major 4 27,300 30,700 34,100 Arterial(3) 2 14,400 16,200 18,000 Arterial 4 28,700 32,300 35,900 Mountain Arterial(3) 2 12,900 14,500 16,100 Mountain Arterial with Roundabouts(5) 2 16,000 18,000 20,000 Mountain Arterial 3 16,700 18,800 20,900 Mountain Arterial 4 29,800 33,500 37,200 Urban Arterial 4 28,700 32,300 35,900 Urban Arterial 6 43,100 48,500 53,900 Urban Arterial 8 57,400 64,600 71,800 Expressway 4 32,700 26,800 40,900 Expressway 6 49,000 55,200 61,300 Expressway 8 65,400 73,500 81,700 Freeway 4 61,200 68,900 76,500 Freeway 6 94,000 105,800 117,500 Freeway 8 128,400 144,500 160,500 Freeway 10 160,500 180,500 200,600 Ramp(4) 1 16,000 18,000 20,000 Notes: (1) All capacity figures are based on optimum conditions and are intended as guidelines for planning purposes only. (2) Maximum two-way ADT values are based on the Riverside County General Plan and the Riverside County Congestion Management Program. (3) Two-lane roadways designated as future arterials that conform to arterial design standards for vertical and horizontal alignment are analyzed as arterials. (4) Ramp capacity is given as a one-way traffic volume. (5) Capacity based on simulation models developed by Fehr&Peers and is unique to the future control along Rancho California Road. i I FEHRJf 5c�� y Final Traffic impact Study for the Wine Country Gommunrty F'aa =Flverfce �� November 2011Mum r t wo 4� < • Route 24—Route 24 is a circulator bus route primarily serving the City of Temecula. It connects the retail uses at the north end of the City to Old Town, Pechanga Resort, and Redhawk areas of the City. Near the WCP area it operates on Moraga and Margarita Roads,just west of WCP area, with stops at Palomar Village and the Temecula Walmart. It operates on 30- to 60-minute headways during weekdays and on 60-minute headways on weekends. In addition to this route, several private companies operate shuttles that circulate customers throughout the WCP area on wine tasting tours. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORK In general, there are limited bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the WCP area. The provided facilities are mixed- use pathways providing facilities for bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians in the study area. These facilities are generally provided parallel to Rancho California Road and De Portola Road. The rural nature of the remaining facilities requires bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians to use the roadway shoulders in the WCP area. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS The number of lanes and daily volumes shown on Figures 2 and 3 were utilized to evaluate traffic operations on the study roadway segments. Figure 4 summarizes the existing intersection turning movement volumes. Traffic volumes were obtained from County Staff, the City of Temecula Traffic Count Database, collected by Fehr & Peers, or were obtained from the Caltrans publication"Traffic Volumes on California State Highways, 2009." ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS Fehr & Peers utilized the existing traffic volumes and number of travel lanes to evaluate operations at the study roadway segments. Results for weekday and weekend conditions are summarized in Table 4. TABLE 4—ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS Rancho California Road West of La Serena Way 2 14,285 D 13,569 D Rancho California Road West of Anza Road 2 N/A N/A 13,798 D Anza Road South of Rancho California Road 2 N/A N/A 3,924 C or Better Glenoaks Road South of Rancho California Road 2 N/A N/A 4,316 C or Better Rancho California Road East of 1-15 8 58,091 D 52,444 C or Better Rancho California Road East of Anza Road 2 13;358 D 14;104 D Anza Road North of De Portola Road 2 4,031 C or Better 4,235 C or Better De Portola Road East of Anza Road 2 4,137 C or Better 5,235 C or Better Mesa Road North of Glenoaks Road 2 3,187 C or Better 3,189 C or Better De Portola Road East of Glenoaks Road 2 528 C or Better 654 C or Better SR 79 East of 1-15 6 36,789 C or Better 35,775 C or Better SR 79 West of Butterfield Stage Road 6 30,984 C or Better 32,192 C or Better SR 79 East of Anza Road 2 8,300 C or Better 11,145 C or Better FEHR P'EERS � i Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Ccuntr Comertut rfy Pfau� of td November 2011 ; n <' 1 TABLE 4 CONTINUED-ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS Butterfield Stage Road north of De Portola Road 4 11,881 C or Better 14,257 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road north of Rancho California Road 2 4,616 C or Better 5,539 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road north of Temecula Parkway 3 13,061 C or Better 15,673 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road south of Channel Street 4 10,257 C or Better 12,308 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road south of La Serena Way 2 4,391 C or Better 5,269 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road south of Pauba Road 4 9,458 C or Better 11,350 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road south of Rancho California Road 4 9,903 C or Better 11,884 C or Better Butterfield Stage Road south of Rancho Vista Road 4 10,168 C or Better 12,202 C or Better Calle Medusa south of Enfield Lane 2 3,849 C or Better 4,619 C or Better De Portola Road east of Jedediah Smith Road 2 7,517 C or Better 9,020 C or Better De Portola Road east of Margarita Road 4 9,223 C or Better 11,068 C or Better De Portola Road east of Meadows Parkway 4 4,129 C or Better 4,955 C or Better De Portola Road.west of Butterfield Stage Road 4 3,980 C or Better 4,776 C or Better Diaz Road north of Rancho California Road 3 10,132 C or Better 12,158 C or Better La Serena Way east of Meadows Parkway 4 7,797 C or Better 9,356 C or Better Margarita Road east of Avenida Barca 4 20,190 C or Better 24,228 C or Better Margarita Road north of Rancho California Road 4 19,771 C or Better 23,725 C or Better Margarita Road north of Santiago Road 4 19,334 C or Better 23,201 C or Better Margarita Road north of Temecula Parkway 4 24,057 C or Better 28,868 D Margarita Road south of Jedediah Smith Road 4 16,450 C or Better 19,740 C or Better Margarita Road south of Rancho California Road 4 19,564 C or Better 23,477 E Margarita Road south of Rancho Vista Road 4 20,071 C or Better 24,085 E Meadows Parkway north of Rancho California Road 4 7,151 C or Better 8,581 C or Better Meadows Parkway north of Temecula Parkway 4 11,715 C or Better 14,058 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of La Serena Way 4 4,416 C or Better 5,299 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Leena Way 4 10,823 C or Better 12,988 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Pauba Road 4 11,395 C or Better 13,674 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Rancho California Road 4 10,466 C or Better 12,559 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Rancho Vista Road 4 11,213 C or Better 13,456 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Sunny Meadows Drive 4 9,579 C or Better 11,495 C or Better Pauba Road east of Butterfield Stage Road 2 3,954 C or Better 4,745 C or Better Pauba Road east of Margarita Road 3 8,621 C or Better 10,345 C or Better Pauba Road east of Meadows Parkway 2 4,745 C or Better 5,694 C or Better Pauba Road east of Ynez Road 3 8,924 C or Better 10,709 C or Better Pauba Road west of Margarita Road 4 8,586 C or Better 10,303 C or Better Rainbow Canyon Road south of Pechanga Parkway 2 7,570 C or Better 9,084 C or Better Im r` `W� �s" 'gRRE L , FEH Rt PEERS � ��� Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country Coxrtrrrurrify /atr ft+ tsrcO November 2019 , , TABLE 4 CONTINUED-ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS Rancho California Road east of Diaz Road 4 21,654 C or Better 25,985 C or Better Rancho California Road east of Moraga Road 4 33,144 E 39,773 F Rancho California Road west of Business Park Drive 2 5,937 C or Better 7,124 C or Better Rancho California Road west of Butterfield Stage Road 4 14,132 C or Better 16,958 C or Better Rancho California Road west of Diaz Road 4 11,993 C or Better 14,392 C or Better Rancho California Road west of Meadows Parkway 4 21,285 D 25,542 E Rancho California Road west of Ynez Road 8 54,850 C or Better 65,820 E Rancho Vista Road east of Margarita Road. 4 7,289 C or Better 8,747 C or Better Rancho Vista Road east of Ynez Road 3 8,075 C or Better 9,690 C or Better Rancho Vista Road west of Margarita Road 4 5,632 C or Better 6,758 C or Better Rancho Vista Road west of Meadows Parkway 3 4,791 C or Better 5,749 C or Better Temecula Parkway east of Margarita Road 6 35,328 C or Better 42,394 C or Better Temecula Parkway east of Meadows Parkway 6 28,426 C or Better 34,111 C or Better Temecula Parkway east of Pechanga Parkway 6 41,564 C or Better 49,877 D Temecula Parkway west of Margarita Road 6 38,199 C or Better 45,839 C or Better Vincent Moraga south of Rancho California Road 2 5,212 C or Better 6,254 C or Better Walcott Lane north of Klarer Lane 2 4,332 C or Better 5,198 C or Better Ynez Road north of Santiago Road 2 13,840 D 16,608 F Ynez Road south of Solana Way 6 30,167 C or Better 36,200 C or Better Ynez Road west of Jedediah Smith Road 2 9,369 C or Better 11,243 C or Better Rainbow Canyon Road S/O Clubhouse Road(Feb.) 2 5,336 C or Better 6,403 C or Better Rainbow Canyon Road S/O Clubhouse Road (Oct.) 2 5,206 C or Better 6,247 C or Better Rancho California Road W/O Margarita Road(Feb.) 4 24,329 C or Better 29,195 D Rancho California Road W/O Margarita Road(July) 4 25,055 C or Better 30,066 D Temecula Parkway E/O Butterfield Stage Road(Feb.) 4 18,476 C or Better 22,171 C or Better Temecula Parkway E/O Butterfield Stage Road(Oct.) 4 18,489 C or Better 22,187 C or Better 1-15 South of SR 79 8 129,000 D 129,000 D 1-15 North of SR 79 8 150,000 E 150,000 E 1-15 South of Rancho California Road Interchange 8 150,000 E 150,000 E 1-15 North of Rancho California Road Interchange 8 161,000 F 161,000 F 1-15 NB Off-Ramp at SR 79 1 10,500 C or Better 10,819 C or Better 1-15 NB On-Ramp at SR 79 1 12,000 C or Better 11,273 C or Better 1-15 SB Off-Ramp at SR 79 1 12,500 C or Better 13,000 C or Better 1-15 SB On-Ramp at SR 79 1 14,600 C or Better 15,050 C or Better 1-15 NB Off-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 12,000 C or Better 11,247 C or Better } FEHRtPEERS Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country Community P(art, ?tvefrde dttfy � November 2011 m TABLE 4 CONTINUED-ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS 1-15 NB On-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 14,000 C or Better 13,780 C or Better 1-15 SB Off-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 19,000 E 18,711 E 1-15 SB On-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 11,500 C or Better 11,883 C or Better Source.Fehr&Peers,2011 N/A-Count Data Not Available INTERSECTION OPERATIONS The LOS results are summarized in Table 5 for weekend peak hour intersection operations assessment. TABLE 5-INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Intersection Control Delay LOS 1.Winchester Road at Nicolas Road Signalized }120 F 2.Winchester Road at Margarita Road Signalized 112.6 F 3.Winchester Road at Ynez Road Signalized 40.3 D 4.Winchester Road at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized 70:0 E 5.Winchester Road at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 28.8 C 6.Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue Signalized 48.6 D 7. Rancho California Road at Ynez Road Signalized 90A F 8. Rancho California Road at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized 43.8 D 9. Rancho California Road at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 41.9 D 10. Rancho California Road at Jefferson Avenue Signalized 34.5 C 11.Temecula Parkway at Old Town Front Street Signalized 28.4 C 12.Temecula Parkway at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 34.4 C 13.Temecula Parkway at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized 38.4 D 14. Temecula Parkway at Pechanga Parkway Signalized 72.2 E 15. Pechanga Parkway at Anza Road Signalized 33 C 16. Margarita Road at La Serena Way Signalized 16.7 B 17. Margarita Road at Rancho California Road Signalized 57.0 E 18. Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road Signalized 56.8 E 19. Margarita Road at Pauba Road Signalized 41.9 D ty FEHRJf PEERS ..., c , ng Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country,CaMmurtr€ Pfar Rt+�tc� �� November 2011 f� TABLE 5 CONTINUED-INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Intersection Control Delay LOS 20. Margarita Road at De Portola Road Signalized 31.8 C 21. Margarita Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized 38.1 D 22. Meadows Parkway at La Serena Way Signalized 10.1 B 23. Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road Signalized 31.8 C 24. Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road Signalized 15.1 B 25. Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road Signalized 17.1 B 26. Meadows Parkway at De Portola Road Signalized 16.7 B 27. Meadows Parkway at Temecula Parkway Signalized 37.8 D 28. Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way SSSC 8.9 A 29. Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho California Road Signalized >120 F 30. Butterfield Stage at Rancho Vista Road SSSC 11.6 B 31. Butterfield Stage Road at Pauba Road Signalized 16.7 B 32. Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road Signalized 22.7 C 33. Butterfield Stage Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized 29.0 C 34. La Serena Way at Rancho California Road SSSC 35:5 E 35. Calle Contento at Rancho California Road SSSC 70.4 F 36. Calle Contento at Madera de Playa SSSC 9.4 A 37. Calle Contento at Pauba Road SSSC 9.7 A 38. Calle Contento at De Portola Road SSSC 8.6 A 39.Anza Road at Borel Road(future) AWS n/a n/a 40.Anza Road at Buck Road(future) AWS n/a n/a 41.Anza Road at Rancho California Road` AWS 69A F 42.Anza Road at Madera de Playa SSSC 10.5 B 43.Anza Road at Pauba Road AWS 9.3 A 44.Anza Road at De Portola Road AWS 10.9 B. 45.Anza Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized 6.7 A 46. Rancho California Road at Camino del Vino SSSC 11.5 B 47. Rancho California Road at Buck Road (future) AWS 10.2 B 48. Rancho California Road at Glen Oaks Road AWS 10.2 B 49. Rancho California Road at Monte De Oro SSSC 421 E 50. Los Caballos Road at Temecula Parkway SSSC 16.5 C 51. Camino del Vino at Glen Oaks Road SSSC 11.4 B 52. Camino del Vino at Monte De Oro SSSC 9.2 A 53. De Portola Road at Benton Road SSSC 9.0 A 54. De Portola Road at Glen Oaks Road SSSC 14.2 B 55. De Portola Road at Via De Oro SSSC 10.1 B BOREL RD 1,600 3 500 0�� rypp 3 ti 500 BUCK RD 5,0 GLENOPKS�O O 2 900 1 2 O MON7F OE OR �QO s a 1p�0 O 2 100 O 3,800 n Z �o 2 LA SERENA yygy 00 o<C) p6po ��o o CPQ oR 220 p Q li o 600 300 8,400 O < 2 14 PIAYARD N A ss-4 100 �0 2 O MADERP E 2 700 0 iQ�� ��o GPR\(PCO 2q?00 19,800 Oa o 1a o J PPvePRo x900 F� o wo SPR 4 130 4,000 b _ 586100 33.100 25,100 2 800 a oo OAS 2 $ 21,00 ��00 LF o �9p0 4 4 �9 9 10 50 \72 Q ,0 0 6 RANCHO V'000 7,300 4 A o z,0 PO VISTA RD 4 600 0 6 i.a 5,600 zm4 -1 5,900 12,040 SO000 3D8,PAUS RD8,600 2 �o ' 0 9OFQOF� O 4,100 O�Q 59pp 4 v O o0 08 �o ,3 20,100 0° o 2 P\,CSRo O o w A-o, v o0 o�OS 05 A o 0 16,50 0 4100 41000 18,4 9 300 po O W N o 4 0 rypp 4 4 4 0 •,. 2 A o 0 0 \p RO ° k 28 400 31 60 13 100 T o R2 o�PORSO 35,300 6 3 FMFCU 00 7 L9 A A �36800 5p0 �'.aN LEGEND . 0 06 41x00 9 TEMECu�P 11,700'40�4/Tq Average Dally © xx.xxx Traffic Volume 2410 4 0 60 x Number of Lanes 4 N Wine Country Boundary O FC NOTTO EXISTING CONDITIONS WEEKDAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FEHRI 'PEERS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AND NUMBER OF LANES al 07.2011 5K FIGURE 2 n:\aom�.4+meV[eoeVe�o-Doss.az\c,o>nxs\rswo\nor_eo:e.ewg 15 �Y. 3 Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country.Qommunit November 2011 w TABLE 8 CONTINUED-ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: FUTURE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS Margarita Road north of Temecula Parkway 4 30,620 D 28,868 D Margarita Road south of Jedediah Smith Road 4 20,961 C or Better 23,944 C or Better Margarita Road south of Rancho California Road 4 27,021 C or Better 29,136 D Margarita Road south of Rancho Vista Road 4 30,767 D 30,421 D Meadows Parkway north of Rancho California Road 4 9,522 C or Better 12,709 C or Better Meadows Parkway north of Temecula Parkway 4 22,605 C or Better 27,626 D Meadows Parkway south of La Serena Way 4 6,458 C or Better 9,463 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Leena Way 4 13,273 C or Better 23,868 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Pauba Road 4 18,871 C or Better 25,013 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Rancho California Road 4 18,301 C or Better 23,938 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Rancho Vista Road 4 25,870 C or Better 26,869 C or Better Meadows Parkway south of Sunny Meadows Drive 4 16,464 C or Better 24,260 C or Better Pauba Road east of Butterfield Stage Road 4 16,052 C or Better 21,533 C or Better Pauba Road east of Margarita Road 4 21,690 C or Better 28,052 C or Better Pauba Road east of Meadows Parkway 4 18,389 C or Better 20,735 C or Better Pauba Road east of Ynez Road 4 16,613 C or Better 20,735 C or Better Pauba Road west of Margarita Road 4 16,302 C or Better 20,109 C or Better Rainbow Canyon Road south of Pechanga Parkway 4 10,644 C or Better 12,498 C or Better Rancho California Road east of Diaz Road 6 21,654 C or Better 28,565 C or Better Rancho California Road east of Moraga Road 6 42,330 C or Better 50,245 E Rancho California Road west of Business Park Drive 4 11,205 C or Better 9,249 C or Better Rancho California Road west of Butterfield Stage Road 4 17,374 C or Better 29,302 D Rancho California Road west of Diaz Road 4 23,473 C or Better 20,578 C or Better Rancho California Road west of Meadows Parkway 4 27,902 C or Better 37,187 F Rancho California Road west of Ynez Road 8 59,458 D 65,820 E Rancho Vista Road east of Margarita Road. 4 16,937 C or Better 21,803 D Rancho Vista Road east of Ynez Road 4 22,135 D 23,974 E Rancho Vista Road west of Margarita Road 4 21,380 D 20,292 C or Better Rancho Vista Road west of Meadows Parkway 4 16,831 C or Better 20,418 C or Better Temecula Parkway east of Margarita Road 6 42,947 C or Better 50,801 D Temecula Parkway east of Meadows Parkway 6 43,986 C or Better 58,403 E Temecula Parkway east of Pechanga Parkway 8 41,740 C or Better 51,421 C or Better Temecula Parkway west of Margarita Road 6 38,199 C or Better 45,839 C or Better Vincent Moraga south of Rancho California Road 2 7,576 C or Better 11,171 D Ynez Road north of Santiago Road 4 20,645 C or Better 27,651 C or Better Ynez Road south of Solana Way 6 46,188 D 47,690 D IN F FEHRJf PEER z y Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Country Comrhdnity t November 2019 r � TABLE 8 CONTINUED-ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE: FUTURE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Weekday Weekend Segment Lanes Volume LOS Volume LOS Ynez Road west of Jedediah Smith Road 4 21,393 D 26,762 F Rainbow Canyon Road S/O Clubhouse Road (Feb.) 4 8,410 C or Better 9,817 C or Better Rainbow Canyon Road S/O Clubhouse Road (Oct.) 4 8,280 C or Better 9,661 C or Better Rancho California Road W/O Margarita Road(Feb.) 6 32,279 C 42,728 C Rancho California Road W/O Margarita Road(July) 6 33,005 C 43,599 D Temecula Parkway E/O Butterfield Stage Road(Feb.) 6 49,423 D 65,847 F Temecula Parkway E/O Butterfield Stage Road(Oct.) 6 49,436 D 65,863 F 1-15 South of SR 79 8 192,212 E 185,484 E 1-15 North of SR 79 8 213,434 F 199,359 E 1-15 South of Rancho California Road Interchange 8 213,434 F 199,359 E 1-15 North of Rancho California Road Interchange 8 223,344 F 208,758 F 1-15 NB Off-Ramp at SR 79 1 15,192 C or Better 17,890 C or Better 1-15 NB On-Ramp at SR 79 1 16,190 D 13,143 C or Better 1-15 SB Off-Ramp at SR 79 1 30,792 C or Better 27,455 C or Better 1-15 SB On-Ramp at SR 79 1 32,166 D 31,429 C or Better I-15 NB Off-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 19,555 E 13,962 C or Better 1-15 NB On-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 17,970 D 15,592 C or Better 1-15 SB Off-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 20,354 F 18,711 E 1-15 SB On-Ramp at Rancho California Road 1 14,012 C or Better 13,140 C or Better Source:Fehr&Peers,2011 N/A-Count Data Not Available INTERSECTION OPERATIONS The intersection LOS results are summarized in Table 9 for Scenario 3 weekend conditions. The intersection volumes are shown on Figure 10. TABLE 9-INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE: FUTURE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Intersection Control Delay LOS 1.Winchester Road at Nicolas Road Signalized >120 f= 2.Winchester Road at Margarita Road Signalized 73.6 E i 3.Winchester Road at Ynez Road Signalized 66A E 4.Winchester Road at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized >120 F 5.Winchester Road at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 48.3 D ��`. -12 ' .`:b3,^� "(s'xa" " ' � FEHRJf PEERS i Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wine Oountr 'tomr070 November 2011 TABLE 9 CONTINUED-INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE: FUTURE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Intersection Control Delay LOS 6.Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue Signalized 48.9 D 7. Rancho California Road at Ynez Road Signalized >120 F 8. Rancho California Road at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized 42.9 D 9. Rancho California Road at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 34.3 C 10. Rancho California Road at Jefferson Avenue Signalized 43.1 D 11.Temecula Parkway at Old Town Front Street Signalized 39.9 D 12.Temecula Parkway at 1-15 SB Ramps Signalized 103`8 F 13.Temecula Parkway at 1-15 NB Ramps Signalized 63.3 E 14. Temecula Parkway at Pechanga Parkway Signalized 38.4 D 15. Pechanga Parkway at Anza Road Signalized 85:5 F 16. Margarita Road at La Serena Way Signalized 102.1 F 17. Margarita Road at Rancho California Road Signalized 89.6 F 18. Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road Signalized 86.7 F 19. Margarita Road at Pauba Road Signalized 104:7 F 20. Margarita Road at De Portola Road Signalized 41.3 D 21. Margarita Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized 53.9 D 22. Meadow Parkway at La Serena Way Signalized 11.0 B 23. Meadow Parkway at Rancho California Road Signalized 46.6 D 24. Meadow Parkway at Rancho Vista Road Signalized 40.2 D 25. Meadow Parkway at Pauba Road Signalized 50.2 D 26. Meadow Parkway at De Portola Road Signalized 28.3 C 27. Meadow Parkway at Temecula Parkway Signalized 68;5 E 28. Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way SSSC >120 F 29. Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho California Road Signalized >120 F 30. Butterfield Stage at Rancho Vista Road SSSC >120 F 31. Butterfield Stage Road at Pauba Road Signalized 97;8 F 32. Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road Signalized 32.9 C 33. Butterfield Stage Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized >120 F 34. La Serena Way at Rancho California Road Signalized 23.5 C 35. Calle Contento at Rancho California Road Signalized 11.0 B 36. Calle Contento at Madera de Playa Signalized 7.9 A 37. Calle Contento at Pauba Road Signalized 11.1 B 38. Calle Contento at De Portola Road SSSC 16.4 C 39.Anza Road at Borel Road(future) Signalized 11.5 B 40.Anza Road at Buck Road(future) Signalized 13.6 B 41.Anza Road at Rancho California Road Signalized 48.7 D FEHR ' PEES. i t i Final Traffic Impact Study for the Wille Cauntry,Comrrruf November 2011 TABLE 9 CONTINUED-INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE: FUTURE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Intersection Control Delay LOS 42.Anza Road at Madera de Playa Signalized >120 F 43.Anza Road at Pauba Road Signalized 16.7 B 44.Anza Road at De Portola Road Signalized 7.7 A 45.Anza Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized >120 F 46. Rancho California Road at Camino del Vino SSSC >120 F 47. Rancho California Road at Buck Road(future) AWS 55.4 F 48. Rancho California Road at Glen Oaks Road AWS 32.1 D 49. Rancho California Road at Monte De Oro Signalized 12.4 B 50. Los Caballos Road at Temecula Parkway Signalized 36:6 D 51. Camino del Vino at Glen Oaks Road Signalized 11.1 B 52. Camino del Vino at Monte De Oro Signalized 6.9 A 53. De Portola Road at Benton Road SSSC 9.8 A 54. De Portola Road at Glen Oaks Road SSSC 19.9 C 55. De Portola Road at Via De Oro SSSC 10.2 B 56. De Portola Road at Monte De Oro SSSC 27:3 D 57. De Portola Road at Camino del Vino SSSC 14.3 B 58. De Portola Road at Pauba Road SSSC 40.4 E 59. Pauba Road at Los Caballos Road SSSC 9.8 A 60. Pauba Road at Temecula Parkway SSSC 20.8 C Source: Fehr&Peers, 2011 AWS-All Way Stop, SSSC-Side Street Stop Control Intersection evaluated using the TRAFFIX software as Synchro cannot evaluate stop-controlled intersections with more than two lanes on any one approach. Shaded cells indicate unacceptable operations. � m ,''.`. � 'u,� ''� l ����� T' FEHR ` PEERS � BOREL RD 2,900 4 h� Olk)6�O 7200� �p0 19 100BUCK'RD 16 G\6N0clj 0 q �QQ X60 ti 8 000 �p 25,2000 MpNFEDEOR �e0� �k10 O 2700 o `L 4T o0 LA SERE �S 0 NA WAY o0 O 1�5 'w p 2 y O0 00 < �� Y��oo 143p0 CPU YARD 9106 � r 20� l2 33 A�lyyiys o Q00 �0 2 MADF-F-p EPLA 14,300 0 P� q400 32,200 n o k o N PP�BARo S9oo F� w prn M, O 4t 900 N 16,100 'sOY0 � / o rn`'oo 628700 42,300 33,000 2 a g00 0 �,--^4f 21,700 �'oo 'o+ 9600 6 4 c�j 16 b 18 30 018 p0� 6 0 6 6 r RANCHO o0 16 900 4 OD a n o X00 VtSTARD 21,4000 4 21�p0 co �$ �G m� 11.20023500 oo 600 PAUBA 4 k TT7 m 4 'o 0 16 0 ? Fl O o Ode O r}6o0 po a� 4 4 80 o �PO�F`Q 0 7,200 rOQO �o Q 30,800 s SRD i 0 00 o 5 GAaA�O T 0 0 0 16,400 400 9 O R o 24Op0 $00 4162k 4 49,6 150 O o o : �i 0-co rn P 500 vim o A0 SRO 4,},000 k6,6 r 33900 6 lF OEpOFZO 42900 6 4 �FCu ql 8 2p0 38 200 6 7p �A N g�� 4170 pK 2d q q�0 EE6EN6 00 0 6 9;SEM�G 22,600 4G R/?q Awe 4MIx > 30 60 4 X)f Xx)4 PreMic-YWume 0' o 70 z t�wnAaalh+le N a e so 4 4 �, 6 OAC NOT TO � � iB,�IUtL�iY(j441tiEtOfy FUTURE(CUMULATIVE)NO PROJECT CONDITIONS WEEKDAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FEHR,�PEERS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AND NUMBER OF LANES : ac a�.zon ac N.\Jobx\PCGvv\IE Jeba\E1p-Op5G02\Crapl,�m\M:Ap\ApT,9axv tlwg FIGURE 8 37 r - r ` RORIPAUGH RANCH REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA r r Prepared for: Mr. Richard Ashby ASHBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. 470 E. Harrison Street Corona, CA 92879.1314 1 1 ' Prepared by: r URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. �pFESSIQ 41 Corporate Park, Suite 210 o�'OTT Irvine, CA 92606 4� 0 CL C-3 No.C q0277. m rEFF zp. * John Kain, A.I.C.P. qrf A` Scott Sato, P.E. Tom Huang, EIT 1 Original Submittal May 25, 1999 City Screencheck Revised May 18, 2001 Revised November 26,2001 i 00044-08 JK:SS:TH:ko i i r i rt EXHIBIT 4-W YEAR 2003 WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) kn �1tP PR/ " vii a i POURROY RD. MURRIE r 1 ci 3 3 %A t `_ _� SPR!!VG A KO •ZA•. p a a W J t X011 4.3 ------T-"--------I 3qy Rd• 7�1 ~ y s r �i1 0.7'"'i 1 # 7.s .I---------, ,—S ITE CALLE uo,� DEL LAGO ^� 1 ESRD �is�m z iC=_--_ ----1 .% N1G0 19 sO �v 74.7 O t �tiTF CALLE CHAPOS t 031�0 -' LARE NA- �f _ SE WY � t ` t t A 03 N.GENERAL KEARNY RD. pt` ► 1� 7 143 UTTERFIELD STAGE RD. .c v NO CA 6 OVERLAND DR. 78-9 N NC 13 \MEADOWS PKWY. d A�0 3 6.6 LEGEND: j 66.6-VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) i i RORIPAUGH RANCH,Temecula,California-00044:25 URBAN 4-30 EXHIBIT 4-Y t YEAR 2007 WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) LA } rn v`P pR%y a N 3 D cc Q ;POURROY �� N z ~ Ir SPR!G'�a NOS 3149 rn o O ' �.'t1-i-2787 ----^c---------I Q S RD lg� � > Y� 0111Z.9 ��. a 1 �i w 14.4 z�1---------� 12.8,hSITE CALLE "� O - 4, I DEL LAGO <v' -ji �•��•� Va 1 Gam ' 6 0.6 �Io 10.2 NOLO 1a� � F�� �a in `r ryto ��y CALLS CHAPOS h '►� Q 'LA SERENA n WY_ % �n 1 ♦ N h,♦� N.GENERAL 8� i ��♦ KEARNY RD. ♦♦ 1 6.7 a JL5 w 90 UTTERFIELD STAGE RD. / p rn aRANCNO a9 OVERLAND DR. !D 42.0 3 %EADOWS PKWY. OA� i O� s 76.1 LEGEND: 75.6-VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) RORIPAUGH RANCH,Temecula,California-00044:27 URBAN I 4-33 EXHIBIT 4-Z GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ADT Ln > P prn 9/ p IA Q � �POURROY RD. D v z N SPRfNctEra NOS a 6 O 3 + �.Ni3�-a�'� '!'�---- --------t 6z Rp u 339 }' v GSI 5 } 4 1---------t SITE ! zI , LLEEr" p ! b. 1 DEL LAGO W n �i � 1� i:� ► � I 3.9 26.8 j ^ a CALLE CHAPOS a rn 's to y• N.GENERAL KEARNY RD. ��` I 1j Mme• ? �0 8.4 GAS\T 91 UTTERFIELD STAGE RD. O 'L OVERLAND DR. NN a RANCt� 11 EADOWS PKWY. 00 •1 6.0 LEGEND: 66.0 VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) RORIPAUGH RANCH,Temecula,California-00044:28 UjtBAN 4-34 EXHIBIT 4-AA GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) LA >}: jo e#. _ o "- stn rr> > td7 POU RROY RD. I y h 0 MURR� `r s v~, s _ Ir t a SPR lIyGETq NO'C A$1 o p w =, i•�j 33.$'L�"�-- -- ---------I 7� RD in Sys ►' > tai pr1 33,g;�. J 33.t�46.7 ------ -0 "SITE CALLS wl ham. e;p I DELLAGO5.0 b 1ne 11.6 �� 1 of 1 ri ► I NICO 15 A t .r t to �s H 30.9 p M ►pyr ,F •� ^^�' CALLE CHAPOS �,• � SLA SERE NA � �, , "t' a WY. �♦ t 119 v p,A N.GENERAL 9 t � `?6 �O q KEARNY RD. u� t lb- M h 0.3 \UTTERFIELD STAGE RD. RANC 36.3 HO 9� OVERLAND DR. `� 1 �EADOWS PKWY. W NN v a�5 s Q� 7.5 LEGEND: 67.3 VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) RORIPAUGH RANCH,Temecula,Califomia•00044:29 URBAN 4-36 j I TABLE 5,5 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANESI NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY" LEVEL OF BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS. SERVICE TRAFFIC I INTERSECTION CONTROL' L T R L T R L T R L -T R AM PM AM PM 1-215 Fwy.SB Ramps(NS)at: • Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 1 0 3 1» 21.0 13.6 C B 1-215 Fwy, NB Ramps(NS)at: , • Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EW TS 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 3 1 5.8 12.7 A B 1-15 Fwy.SB Ramps(NS)at: Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 1» 0 4 1» 29.5 '5 C F Rancho California Rd. EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 1-10 3 1» 17.5 41.1 B D , 1-15 Fwy. NB Ramps(NS)at: • Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 2 1- 20.1 C F • Rancho California Rd. EW TS 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 3.5 1.5» 11.3 16.81 B B Ynez Rd.(NS)at: ' Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 1> 2 2 1> 2 2.5 1.5> 2 3 0 F F Rancho California Rd. EW TS 2 2 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1» 2 3 1 48.6 51.6 D D Margarita Rd.(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 1.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 3 1> 1 3 0 29.1 36.4 C D Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 1> 2 2 1> 2 3 1> 2 3 1 40.0 ' D F La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 18.3 28.9 B C Rancho California Rd. EW TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1> 2 2 1> 46.3 49.4 D D Winchester Rd.(NS)at: >I Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 2 4 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 41.2 46.1 D D Nicolas Rd. EW TS 2 4 1>> 2 4 1 1 1 1? 3 1 0 48.2 47.9 D D N.General Kearny Rd.(NS)at: • Nicolas Rd. EW TS 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 26.7 31.7 C C , Meadows Pkwy.(NS)at: La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 7-0 7.3 A A Rancho California Rd. EW TS 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 11. 2 1 44.5 34.4 D C Pourroy Rd.(NS)at • Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EW TS 0 0 0 2 0 1> 2 2 0 0 2 1 29.5 28.4 C C Butterfield Stage Rd.(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 2 3 0 0 2 1» 2 0 1- 0 0 0 25.5 22.2 C C Nicolas Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 15.9 20.7 B C Calle Chapos(EW) TS 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 31.3 19.1 C B La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 1 2 1 1 21 2 1 0 1 1 0 27.8 38.1 C D Rancho California Rd. EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 32.5 37.3 C D Calle Contento(NS)at: Rancho California Rd, EW CSS 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 15.411161__.C-- It .416.6Ctl should be noted that improvements have been constructed by the City of Temecula and Caltrans at the study area intersections. Theca additional lanes have been accounted for within the lane configurations with improvements. z When a right tum is designated,the lane can either be striped or unsiriped. To function a5 a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left:T=Through;R-Right:»>Free Right Tum;>-Right Turn Overlap;1=lane Improvement S Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffix,Version 7,1.0607(1999). i Per the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. 4 TS -Traffic Signal CSS=Cross Street Slop ' S• e Additional General Plan analysis of tongderm future service levels along SR-79 in the vicinity of the Temecula Valley Mall is currently being conducted by the City or Temecula. E:%UcJobs\00001--lZO0441excerg000440039-05.xls)5.5 5-24 1 i TABLE 5.3(CONT'D) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR YEAR 2007 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY' LEVEL OF BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND SECS: SERVICE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION CONTROL' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM Winchester Rd.(NS)at: Murrieta Hot,Springs Rd.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 30.5 47.3 C 0 Nicolas Rd.(EW) -Without Improvements TS 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 71.9 83.6 E F "With Improvements TS 1 3 1> 1 3 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 39.9 41A D D N.General Kearny Rd.(NS)at: Nicolas Rd.(EW) Without Improvements CSS 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 • F F -With Improvements TS 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 11.3 8.6 8 A Meadows Pkwy.(NS)at: • La Serena Wy.(EW) CSS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 15.5 13.8 C B Rancho California Rd. EW TS r 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 50A 41.6 O D Butterfield Stage Rd.(NS)at: Rancho California Rd.(EW) -Without Improvements CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 - - F F -With Improvements TS' 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 12.4 110 8 ' B Calle Contento(NS)at: Rancho California Rd. EW CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 D 0 1 0 20.5 23:4 C C t When a right tum is designated,the lane can either be striped or tmtdped.To hxictlon as a right tum lane Owe must tie sLfWent width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through ones: L_:Left:T-Through:R=Right:»:Free Right Tum:>=Right Tum Overlap:I-Ihprovernant 2 Delay and revel of service calculated using the fdkmAng analysis software:Traflix.Version 7:1.0007(19991. Per the 1997*hway Capacity Manual,overall average intwsK*n delay and level of service are shown For intersections with traffic,signal or all way stop contrd. For intersections with cross steel stop control,Ute delay and level of servkx for the worst I div"movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. a TS =Traffic Sigml CSS=Cross Street Stop i •-a intersection flr>stable,Delay Hgh.Level of Servke`F•. U:1ticJobswa0441Excerg00044-0039-02.x)s153 3 i { 5-13 , i Ii 1 t TABLE 5.4(CONT•D) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR YEAR 2007 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS 1 INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- < SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY'; LEVEL OF BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND SECS. SERVICE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION CONTROLS L T R L T 'R IL TR L' T R AM PM AM PM Winchester Rd.(N$)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 29.752.0 C D Nicolas Rd.(EW) -Without Improvements TS 1' 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 —` — F F -With Improvements TS 2 3 1>' 2 31 1 1'' 0 1 1 41A 46.7 D I D N.General Kearny Rd.(NS)at: • Nicolas Rd.(EW) -Without Improvements CSS 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2, 1 1 2 1 — - F F i -With Improvements TS 0` 1 1 0 1 :0 1 2' 1 1 ' 2 1 '10.8 9.4 B A Meadows Pkwy.(NS)atr • La Serena Wy.(EW) CSS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 17.2 15.9 C C • Rancho California Rd. EW TS 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 52.9 36.5 D D Butterfield Stags Rd.(NS)at: j • Rancho California Rd.`(EW) -Without Improvements CSS 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 — - F F 1 With Improvements T 0 1 -0 0 1 0 0 1 i 0 1 0 16.2 26.9 B C Calle'Contento;(NS)at:_ • Rancho California Rd.'`(EW). CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 `1 0 21.4 24.6 C C I When a right tum Is designated,the tans can either be strt wd or unsidped. To funcdort as a right kxn teas there must be sumdant width for right bir*v vsNclee to traval oW We the through lorms. L■Len:T a Through;R-Right;»■Free Right Turm>r Right Tum Overlap:1=lmfxoverriont , I � � DWay and levet d servks tatwtaled usurp the foYovMtp ansysb.tinware:Tre1fp,Verson 7.5.cols{2000 Per tlta 1987 itignway capadly: At MML overew aveags Ynbneetfon deby and WWW of savke ars dhow„for lmerseceoro wiau troft stpnW oras way stop oMua. For irdarsedlorts wdh cross street stop coftd,the detay and leve!of Service for the wast trrdf&W wovamem(or nwWonents sharbg a segie km)am shown. s TS ■Traffic Signal CSS•Cross Strew Stop 4_■Waisoctlar LMetnbis,Delay High.Leval of Service•F'. rttUCJoDe100001-U029BV0(1014Wtttehj00W4 003t1-0S.xb)54 , S-1'9 I I , i i i TABLE 5-6 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS I INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- ,SOUTH. EAST- WEST. _DELAYS,-LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND' BOUND SOUND (SECS.) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL' L T R L T RL T R L T R AM I PM AM PM 1-215 Fwy.S8 Ramps(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 0 `0 0 2 0 2 0 3 1 0 3 1» 23.5 116.9 C B 1-215 Fwy.NO Ramps(NS)at: Murrieta Hot S rin s Rd.(EW TS 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 3 1 5.8 15.0 A B 1-15 Fwy.SB Ramps(NS)at: • Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 0 '0 0 2 0 2' 0 4 1>> 0 4 1» 32.7 •5 C F Rancho California Rd.(EW) TS 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 1» 0 3 1- 18.1 42.0 8 1 D ( 1-15 Fwy.NO Ramps(NS)at: Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 3 i» 21.8 - C F Rancho California Rd.(EW) TS 1.5 ':0 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 1» 0 3.5 11.5» 11_6 17.9 B B ` Ynez Rd (NS)at: • Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 1> 2 2 1> 2 2.5 1.5> 2 3 0 F F Rancho California Rd. EW) TS 2 2 1 12 3 1» 2 3 1» 12 3 _1 50.9 52.71 D I D Margarita'Rd.(NS)at: i Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 1.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 3 1> 1 3 0 32.1 50.8 C` D Winchester Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 1> 2 2 11> 2 3 1> 2 3 1 47.3 ' ' D F La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 20.5 27.8 B' C i Rancho California Rd.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1,; 2 2 12: 2, 2 1> 49.3 :52.1 D D Winchester Rd.(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TS 2 4 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 47.5 55.0 D D s Nicolas Rd.(EW) TS 2 » 4 1 1 1 > 3 1 1> 54.1 38.3 D O N,General Kearny;Rd.INS)at Nicolas Rd.(EW) TS 0 1 1 0 1 0` 1 2 1 1 2 1`: 36.7 36.0 D' D Meadows Pkwy.(NS)at: La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 `2 0 7.1 7.4 A A Rancho California Rd.(EW) TS 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 44.9 36.9 D D Pourroy Rd.(NS)al: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EW TS 11 1 2 1 1> 2 2 1 1 2 1 42.6 54.4 D' D f Project Entrance(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. EW TS 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 12.1 24.1 B C Butterfield Stage Rd.(NS)at: Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.(EW) TSS 2 3 0 0 2 11>> 2 0 1» 0 0 0 44.8 46.7 D D Nicolas Rd.(EW) T5 2 3 0 2 2 1 : 2 1 1 i 1 1> 39.5 46.7 C D Calle Chapos(EW) TS 3 2 1 1 2 .1 1 1 0 1 1 0 50.1 37.2 D C La Serena Wy.(EW) TS 1 '2 1 :1 3 0 2 1 = 0 1 1 0 29.3 51.4 C D Rancho California Rd,(EW) TS 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 34.6 51.8 C' D Calle Contento(NS)at: _ Rancho California Rd.(EW) CSS 1 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 1 2 0 11 0 15.8 17.3 C C I It should be noted that improvements have been constructed by the City of Temecula and Caltrans at the study area intersections. Those additional lanes have boon accounted for within the lane configurations with improvements. Z When a right tum is designated,the lane can either be striped or"tripod.To function as a right turn lane . there must be sufficient width for right lumina vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Leh:T=Through.R e Right;>y-Free Right Tum;>-Right Tum Overlap:1-Lane Improvement 3 Delay and level d service calculated using the following analysis software Trarfix,Version 7.5.1015(20D0). ' Per the 1997 Highway CapacityWnual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, For Intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown, 4 TS •Traffic Signal CSS-Cross Street Stop s• Additional general plan analysis of long-term future service levels along SR-79 in the vicinity of the Temecula Valley Mall is currently being conducted by the City of Temecula. C:tDatatW orhkA004a�Excen(00044-0039-05.xls]S8 5-28 3 EXHIBIT 3-F } EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) t 3 i 'd D y'o Q 109 i PdURRdY M «. z t; t SPR►N rA �d� 1g� ,n a d -+ �.^1�===�-.. ___�r.....r.,--- --I 2.9 II---------r ' t F t Q LE �� � SITE DEL LAGO �$ u 0 ca NSC• 6 3 < .� � to s q� CALLE CHAPOS ul t 44rO � •p -y WY. . i I rvi i i 6. ( �qq N.GENERAL A5 ` e KEARNY RD. ?% 6 `Pb� 47.4 1 „� �` �• �F 4.6 UTTERFIELD STAGE RD. �d 3 OVERLAND DR. � w rn. 23.6 RAND 19' \MEADOWS PKWY. ?s 4 'Do LEGEND: 90.0 VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'5) RORIPAUGH RANCH,Temecula,Califomia.00044:14 3-Iia RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 15-1664) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11) was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. 1 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific (SP 11) was approved on January 11, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". B. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides that the issuance of building permits for Phase II buildings of the Specific Plan are conditioned upon the completion of design and construction of certain Public Improvements. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan would modify the schedule and building permit "trigger points" or "building permit thresholds" for various public improvements related to development in Phase II of the Specific Plan. The Owners of the Phase II Properties have requested modifications to the infrastructure implementation schedule to be able to install them in a more cost effective and efficient manner based on current market conditions. C. On February 17, 2016 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, and proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 16-06 recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) be approved. D. On March 8, 2016 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council. E. The City has reviewed the potential impacts of the Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) and the various potential benefits to the City of the Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) and has concluded that Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) is in the best interests of the City. F. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) is consistent with the City's General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof. Amendment No. 2 modifies the timing for the construction of various improvements in the Roripuagh Ranch Specific Plan area, but is otherwise consistent with the development requirements set forth in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, as amended. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan discusses, at length, the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. By Resolution No. 2016- the City Council certified and approved the Addendum No. 2 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Project. Section 2. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (AP 11). The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 3. Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero did not participate in the discussion of Item 1, Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, of Exhibit A of Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP1 1) and abstained with respect to the action on this particular item. While neither has any ownership or investment interests in Europa Village Estates adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road at this location, it is an otherwise related entity to them as further described in the Staff Report. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 8th day of March, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11) The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11)was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. 1 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific (Specific Plan No. 11)was approved on January 11, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. This Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11) was approved by the City Council on March 8, 2016 by the adoption of Resolution No. 16- . The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to in this Amendment No. 2 as the "Specific Plan." The Specific Plan is amended as follows: 1. This Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan only pertains to those portions of the Specific Plan affecting the properties and development of Phase 11 of the Specific Plan. 2. The Specific Plan provides that certain Public Improvements shall be designed and constructed in conjunction with the development of Phase 11 of the Specific Plan "Phase 11 Specific Plan Improvements." The Specific Plan also provides that the issuance of building permits for Phase II buildings are conditioned upon the completion of design and construction of certain Phase 11 Specific Plan Improvements. Those provisions of the Specific Plan conditioning the issuance of building permits upon the completion of design and construction of certain Phase 11 Specific Plan Improvements are hereby amended by deleting the text, descriptions and building permit release thresholds for the Phase II Specific Plan Improvements and replacing the text, descriptions and building permit release thresholds for the Phase II Specific Plan Improvements with Exhibit A to this First Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. 3. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of the Specific Plan shall remain in full force and effect. -1- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing "AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11)" was duly adopted by Resolution No. 16- of the City Council of the City of Temecula on March 8, 2016. Randi Johl, JD, MMC City Clerk -2- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 EXHIBIT A TO AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE II SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENTS AND SCHEDULE 1. Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 A. Description of Public Improvement. Acquire all right-of-way, complete engineering design, and construct Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 to the intersection with Rancho California Road. Construction will include intersection and traffic signal improvements at Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Road and landscaping of the center medians of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 improvements. When appropriate warrants are met, Owners of Phase II shall contribute a fair share contribution towards the installation of a traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way and related intersection improvements as provided in Section 2.2.6, Phasing of Road Improvements, of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and more specifically, Table 2-3 and Paragraph 4 on page 2-22 of the Specific Plan. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Complete Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements prior to issuance of 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11, excluding the installation of center median landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Complete center median landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 prior to the issuance of the 500th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. C. Responsibility. The City shall construct the Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements using Remaining CFD funds, excluding the installation of landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 shall be constructed by the Owners of Phase II Property. (As used in this Attachment 5-A, the term "Remaining CFD funds" shall mean available bond proceeds from duly authorized community facility district bonds issued by the City and secured by a special tax on the Project Site or the Phase II Properties, or both, pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5.) 2. Traffic Signal, Road, and Intersection Acquisition Fee A. Description of Public Improvement. Establish an on and offsite traffic signal, road and intersection acquisition fee. The fee amount will be determined by the City based on cost estimates provided by the Owners of Phase 11 Property and fees will be collected by the City at the time of building permit issuance. The City will determine when the improvements are required to be installed. The Constructing Party will be reimbursed upon acceptance of the completed improvements by the -3- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 City. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. The on and offsite traffic signals, roads, and intersections to which the Acquisition Fee will be applied are: • Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos • Nicolas Road at Winchester Road B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase 11 shall provide cost estimates and fee basis to the Director of Public Works for approval prior to issuance of 1 st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The City shall collect the approved fee amount at issuance of each building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 starting with the 1st building permit. The ultimate signal modifications and associated improvements at the Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection shall be operational prior to the issuance of the 26th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The timing of the installation for the remaining traffic signals and intersection improvements shall be as determined by the City Director of Public Works, and shall not be an unreasonable time-schedule. The Constructing Party will be reimbursed upon acceptance of the completed improvements by the City. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 3. Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering design and construct full Nicolas Road improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection. The City will use the Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, to construct the improvements from the approved plan as a City- sponsored project. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. Owners of Phase II Property shall be required, on behalf of the City, to provide for all required engineering design, construction plans, CEQA analysis & processing, environmental mitigation measures, right-of-way acquisition, and to obtain all necessary Resource Agency and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District permits. Costs of design, mitigation, project management and construction will be eligible for -4- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 reimbursement from the CFD funds, with priority to the costs of construction. Costs of right-of-way acquisition will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds upon completion of the required acquisition. The approved plan shall include all utility, drainage, flood control, bridge, and intersection improvements necessary for the roadway connection. Resource Agency permits for the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection should be combined with the permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road and processed and obtained as a single package. Upon review of final design plans and estimates by the City, the City shall determine a security amount corresponding to the then current engineering cost estimates plus design, mitigation and right-of-way acquisition costs, costs of construction and contingencies for both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall post a letter of credit with the City, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the security amount. The City shall release the letter of Credit upon the occurrence of one of the following events: (1) Completion of the construction of both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing as required by this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works; or(2) additional proceeds from new CFD bonds are approved and available so that the Remaining CFD funds are sufficient to complete both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. After determination of the security amount, any Remaining CFD funds in excess of the security amount may then be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash channel improvements. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Offsite Segment(Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection to Phase 11 Boundary). The Owners of Phase 11 Property shall submit complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. -5- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals on behalf of the City, together with the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, to allow for start of the City- sponsored project prior to issuance of the 200th building permit for the Phase II Property. If, however, the Owners of Phase II Property are unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, the Owners of Phase 11 Property may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits, up to a total 522 building permits prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits. 3. City shall construct Nicolas Road from the western Project boundary to Calle Girasol Owners of Phase 11 Property shall construct Nicolas Road Improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to western Project boundaries as described in this Section with the Park-n-Ride/Equestrian Staging Area, which is required to be constructed prior to the 1st building permit for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Owners of the Phase II Property shall construct a barricade and turn-around acceptable to the Fire Department on Nicolas Road at the boundary of the Phase 11 Property to remain in place until full Nicolas Road improvements are made from Calle Girasol to the western project boundary and Butterfield Stage Road. C. Responsibility. City, Owners of Phase II Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated between Owners of Phase II Property as noted in item #18 herein below. 4. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the improvements upstream and downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road from the plans approved by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). Both upstream and downstream improvements must be constructed concurrently. Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, above the security amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol improvements may be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek channel improvements. -6- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 Permanent maintenance of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of RCFC&WCD. City of Temecula, as the underlying property owner, will cooperate to remove the existing Restrictive Covenant on the land, and to grant fee ownership to RCFC&WCD for Permanent maintenance. Resource Agency permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and the improvements are off site. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements permits downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road should be combined with the permits for Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection and processed and obtained as a single package. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals, together with the Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, prior to issuance of the 2001h building permit within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. If, however, Owners of Phase 11 Property is unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, Owners of Phase 11 Property may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, up to a total of 522 building permits within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 property prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. -7- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 5. Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements from the plans approved by RCFC&WCD and/or City of Temecula. Construction shall include the bridge abutments for the Pedestrian Bridge. Remaining CFD funds above the security amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol and Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements may be applied to Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements. Permanent maintenance of the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or other maintenance entity reasonably approved by the City of Temecula. As used in this Attachment 5A, "Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 HOA," shall mean a homeowners association duly incorporated under the laws of the State of California for the purposes, among others, of maintaining the various public and private improvements as provided in the Development Agreement and funding such maintenance obligations. There shall only be one HOA for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II maintenance obligations in a form reasonably approved by the Director of Community Development and City Attorney, provided, however, that this HOA may provide for special benefit zones to fund maintenance obligations as approved by the Director of Public Works. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall construct Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in a Planning Area draining into the channel (i.e., Planning Areas 17 through 31). C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 6. Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQMP) A. Description of Public Improvement. As needed, each Owner of Phase II Property shall submit a WQMP Amendment covering its ownership to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) and City for review and comment. The WQMP Amendments shall address both construction and occupancy of the project. The amended WQMPs shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit WQMP Amendments covering their respective ownerships to the SDRWQCB and City for review and comment prior to any additional approval of plans, issuance of permits, and/or grading of each Party's site. -8- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 7. Remaining Public Improvements & Landscaping—Major Roadways A. Description of Public Improvement. The Owners of Phase 2 Property shall complete the public improvements, including sidewalks, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, along the frontage of major roadways adjacent to each Planning Area in their respective ownerships, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. This requirement will pertain to the following major roadways: • Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road • Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street) • Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) • Nicolas Road • North Loop Road • South Loop Road In the event that sidewalks along the above streets are not continuous, the Owners of Phase II Property shall provide an all-weather pedestrian path of travel to ensure continuous pedestrian circulation. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall each complete the public improvements and landscaping including sidewalk, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, adjacent to their frontage on major roadways, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in each adjacent Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 8. Permanent Maintenance of Parkway Landscaping—Landscape Maintenance Master Plan A. Description of Public Improvement. Although originally intended to be maintained by the TCSD, permanent maintenance of slopes and parkways along the frontage of major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. Owners of Phase II Property shall each prepare and submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan to the Community Development Director for review and comment covering all public and private open space areas, parks, slopes, parkways, etc., and especially slopes and parkways along their frontage on major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, which will not be maintained by individual commercial or residential property owners. The Landscape Maintenance Master Plan(s) shall show the locations of any necessary water -9- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 meters and electrical meters, together with the permanent maintenance entity for each area. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan for their respective ownerships to the Community Development Director for review and comment prior to the 1st building permit in each Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property. 9. North and South Loop Roads— Complete Engineering and Landscape Architectural Design A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering and landscape architectural design as public roadways, with: • narrow roadway pavement widths consistent with current City design criteria; • traffic calming measures including measures to address traffic to/from Sports Park(Planning Area 27), Secondary School (Planning Area 28) and Elementary School (Planning Area 29) such as a traffic round-about on the North Loop Road easterly of Planning Area 29; • water quality measures addressing runoff from the roadway pavement and parkway areas; • areas with widened parkways, meandering sidewalks or trails, variations in wall locations and type, or other design features intended to create unique character and visual appeal; and • a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Submit design to the Public Works Director and Community Development Director for approval. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete engineering design of the North and South Loop Roads, and a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development, and submit for approval to the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete landscape architectural design of the North and South Loop Roads and submit for approval to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. -10- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 10. Sports Park (Planning Area 27)— Complete Design & Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Update design of the Sports Park with: • water quality measures addressing runoff from impervious areas and incorporating Low Impact Development(LID)Best Management Practices (BMPs), in accordance with the amended WQMP; • unnecessary turf areas converted to drought tolerant plant materials; • fescue turf soccer fields converted to synthetic turf, • design of tot lot and playground updated to the latest Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards; • proposed site lighting converted to more efficient LED lighting; • pre-wiring for security cameras for each major use area (parking lot, ball fields, restrooms, etc.) and provision of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) system; • approval of the sports field lighting design by the Community Services Director, and, if required, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Authority, with the intent of minimizing the impacts of lighting on the surrounding community; • connection to the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash and potential connection to the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian, and Trailhead facility in Planning Area 3313; and • conversion of the proposed ball field to a 90' infield/325' outfield. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design to the Community Services Director and Public Works Director for approval. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, the Owners of Phase II Property shall update the Sports Park design, and submit plans for approval to the Community Services and Public Works Directors. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall construct the Sports Park and the City shall accept the park, prior to issuance of the 1200'building permit in Roripaugh Ranch, that number including Roripaugh Ranch Phase I. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated on the basis of the City of Temecula's typical parks fee methodology. 11. Private Recreation Center (Planning Area 30)—Use Analysis, Design Development, and Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform a recreational use analysis to guide design development of the Private Recreation Center, optimum location within -11- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and to form the basis for fair share construction and maintenance fiscal contribution decisions by the Owners of Phase II Property. Perform design development based on the recreational use analysis and submit to the Community Development Director for approval. Design development drawings and documents must be sufficient to understand recreational uses, conceptual architecture, construction costs and maintenance/operational costs. Permanent maintenance of the Private Recreation Center shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR and/or Wingsweep shall perform a recreational use analysis, design development, and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Prior to the issuance of the 300th the schedule for completion of construction of the Private Recreation Center shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. C. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 12. Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash. Bridge abutments to be constructed with Long Valley Wash channel construction. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR shall construct the Pedestrian Bridge prior to issuance of the 75th building permit for Planning Areas 22, 23, and 24. C. Responsibility. RVR, individually. 13. Multi-Use Trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, & 21 —Design Development A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform design development of the 15' wide Multi-Use Trail intended to provide a trail in Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 along their southerly boundary, then crossing Long Valley Wash to connect to Planning Area 19 and along its easterly boundary and connecting to properties to the east. Due to changed conditions, trail access into Planning Area 13 has been precluded, crossing of Long Valley Wash may only be accomplished at the easterly Loop Road crossing and introduction of the Wine Country Sewer provides additional opportunity for alternate trail alignment. Design development shall include: • measures to screen onsite and offsite homes from the trail on an"as- needed" basis; -12- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 • measures to provide for safe crossing at the easterly Loop Road crossing of Long Valley Wash; • consideration of connection to properties to the east at Calle Contento, in the alignment of the Wine Country Sewer, as opposed to an alignment through Planning Area 19 to connect to Planning Area 13; • consideration of any potential connection of the trail alignment through Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 to properties to the south, or to the west across Butterfield Stage Road, or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities required to be constructed in Planning Area 33B. If safe and reasonably useful connections from Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 to such properties or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities cannot be expected, then alternate alignments, such as trail crossing facilities at Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road, and/or use of the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash shall be considered in the design development instead; • a Phasing Plan for construction of the multi-use trail in segments to allow for its early construction as well as orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design development to the Community Development Director for approval. Permanent Maintenance of the Multi-Use Trail shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall perform design development of the Multi-Use Trail and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The Multi-Use Trail may be constructed in phases, in accordance with the approved Design. In each Planning Area, the Multi-Use Trail shall be constructed prior to issuance of the 1st building permit(excluding Model Home permits)in the Planning Area. C. Responsibility. Costs allocated in the future based on Planning Area ownership (i.e. trail costs within each Planning Area will be borne by the owner of that Planning Area). 14. Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, Trailhead in Planning Area 33B A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete design and construct the Park-n- Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities, in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail design development and the requirements of the City. -13- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 Permanent maintenance of and providing utilities for the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, and Trailhead in Planning Area 33B shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. Maintenance of the sites for Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities and the facilities during construction shall be the responsibility of the Owners of Phase II. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete design and construct the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail design development and the requirements of the City, prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, 31 and 33A. Prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, 31 and 33A, the Owners of Phase II Property shall also complete the design and construction of the portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the MWD easement, including necessary temporary turn-around geometrics to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The design and construction of this portion of Nicolas Road must be coordinated and consistent with the engineering design and construction of Nicolas Road (Item #3 of this Attachment 5-A). C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 15. Fire Protection Plans A. Description of Public Improvement. Submit plans for structural protection from vegetation fires to the City of Temecula Fire Department. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Fire Protection Plan for their respective areas for approval by the City of Temecula Fire Department prior to the approval of the Tentative Tract/Parcel Map in each of their respective ownerships. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, individually by Planning Area. 16. Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street)— Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Roripaugh Valley Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the access for the Neighborhood Park(Planning Area 6) shall be installed prior to the acceptance of the Neighborhood Park by the City. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. If not already completed with the construction of the Neighborhood Park(Planning Area 6), Owners of Phase 11 Property shall -14- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 complete the Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements prior to the issuance of the Is' building permit in Planning Area 11. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 17. Fiesta Ranch Road (`B" Street) Improvements —Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements from Nicolas Road to Roripaugh Valley Road. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete the Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements prior to issuance of the Is' building permit in Planning Area 12. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 18. On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities—Proportional Cost Sharing. A. Description of Public Improvement. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall share the costs to complete the design, planning, government agency permit approvals, construction and implementation of all of the On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities per the items above on a proportional basis. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Not Applicable. C. Responsibility. As costs are incurred, The Owners of Phase II Property shall each pay their agreed upon proportional share of said approved costs. RVR's proportionate share shall be ninety percent(90%). Wingsweep's proportionate share shall be ten percent(10%). -15- 11086-0097\1919359v1.doc 2-22-2016 ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14-0051) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC (also known as the "Pre-annexation and Development Agreement") was initially approved by Ordinance No. 02-14 of the City Council on December 17, 2002 and recorded on January 9, 2003 as Document No. 2003-018567 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The Development Agreement has been previously amended pursuant to: (1) the First Amendment to the Development Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC, dated February 14, 2006 and recorded on March 7, 2006 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2006-0162268; and (2) the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC, dated April 23, 2013 and recorded on July 3, 2013 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2013- 0324057. The December 17, 2002 development agreement as amended shall be referred to in this Ordinance as the "Development Agreement." B. The Development Agreement and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provide that the issuance of building permits for Phase II buildings are conditioned upon the completion of design and construction of certain Public Improvements. The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan would modify the schedule and building permit "trigger points" or "building permit thresholds" for various public improvements related to development in Phase II of the Roripaugh Project (collectively the "Amendments"). The Owners of the Phase II Properties have requested modifications to the infrastructure implementation schedule to be able to install them in a more cost effective and efficient manner based on current market conditions. C. On February 17, 2016 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 16-06 recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) be approved. D. On March 8, 2016 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council. E. The City has reviewed the potential impacts of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and the various potential benefits to the City of the Third Amendment and has concluded that the Third Amendment is in the best interests of the City. F. The Third Amendment to the Development is consistent with the City's General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof. . The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement modifies the timing for the construction of various improvements in the Roripuagh Ranch Specific Plan area, but is otherwise consistent with the development requirements set forth in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, as amended. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan discusses, at length, the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. H. By Resolution No. 2016- the City Council certified and approved the Addendum No. 2 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Project. Section 2. Approval of Third Amendment to Development Agreement. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Third Amendment to Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC (also known as the "Pre-annexation and Development Agreement")and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Development Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 3. Mayor Naggar and Council Member Comerchero did not participate in the discussion of Item 1, Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, of Exhibit D to the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and abstained with respect to the action on this particular item. While neither has any ownership or investment interests in Europa Village Estates adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road at this location, it is an otherwise related entity to them as further described in the Staff Report. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 16- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of March, 2016, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street. Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt. Code Section 27383 (Space above for recorder's use) THIRD AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC (RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN) THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of March , 2016, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a California municipal corporation ("City"), Wingsweep Corporation, a California corporation ("Wingsweep"), and Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("RVR") (collectively "Phase II Owners"")pursuant to the authority of Section 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code and Article XI, Section 2 of the California Constitution. Pursuant to said authority and in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Third Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Recitals. This Third Amendment is made with respect to the following purposes and facts which the parties agree to be true and correct: a. The Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC (also known as the "Pre-annexation and Development Agreement") was initially approved by Ordinance of the City Council on December 17, 2002 and recorded on January 9, 2003 as Document No. 2003-018567 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The Development Agreement has been previously amended pursuant to: (1)the First Amendment to the Development Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC, dated February 14, 2006 and recorded on March 7, 2006 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2006-0162268; and (2)the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement Between the City of 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 1 Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC, dated April 23, 2013 and recorded on July 3, 2013 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2013-0324057. The December 17, 2002 development agreement as amended shall be referred to in this Third Amendment as the"Development Agreement." b. Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement authorizes parties to the Development Agreement and the City to approve an "Operating Memorandum" which does not constitute an amendment to the Development Agreement, in order to implement the Development Agreement or provide for"changes, adjustments, or clarifications [that] are appropriate to further the intended purposes" of the Development Agreement. Since the date of the Development Agreement, seven Operating Memoranda have been approved: (1) The First Operating Memorandum was entered into on October 21, 2004; (2)the Second Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 21, 2006; (3)the Third Operating Memorandum was entered into on August 31, 2006; (4)the Fourth Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 8, 2007 and recorded on March 8, 2007 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2007- 0160512; (5)the Fifth Operating Memorandum was entered into on October 26, 2010 and recorded on November 18, 2010 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2010-0557219; (6)the Sixth Operating Memorandum was entered into on January 25, 2011 and recorded on March 3, 2011 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2011-0093836; and (7)the Seventh Operating Memorandum was entered into on April 17, 2015 and recorded on May 28, 2015 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2015-0223568. C. The real property which is the subject of this Third Amendment is generally known as the Phase II Property of the Roripaugh Ranch Project. The Phase II Property consists of the Wingsweep Property described in Section l.d. and the RVR Property described in Section I.e. The Phase II Property is depicted on the map in Exhibit A ("Phase 11 Property Map") and is a part of the property subject to the Development Agreement. d. Wingsweep is the owner of real property within the Phase 11 Property that is described on Exhibit B to this Third Amendment("Wingsweep Property") and is a part of the property subject to the Development Agreement. Wingsweep warrants and represents to the City that all persons who have an ownership interest or other interest in the Wingsweep Property have executed this Third Amendment as a party and, further, that no other persons are required to approve this Third Amendment on behalf of Wingsweep. e. RVR is the owner of real property with the Phase II Property that is described on Exhibit C to this Third Amendment("RVR Property") and is a part of the property subject to the Development Agreement. RVR warrants and represents to the City that all persons who have an ownership interest or other interest in the RVR Property have executed this Third Amendment as a party and, further, no other persons are required to approve this Third Amendment on behalf of RVR. f. By Resolution No. 2016- the City Council certified and 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 2 approved the Third Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, its land use entitlements and the Development Agreement pertaining to the environmental analysis of this Third Amendment and Amendment No. 2 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11). g. On February 17, 2016 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum, the proposed Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11). After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly consideration the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 16-06 recommending to the City Council that this Third Amendment be approved. h. On March 8, 2016, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum, the proposed Third Amendment, and the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11). After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly consideration the comments received, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 16- on March 8, 2016 and adopted Ordinance No. 16- on 2016 approving this Third Amendment. i. On 2016, the City Council of the City of Temecula also adopted Resolution No. 16- approving Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) 2. Amendment of Section 4.2 Phase II Improvements. Section 4.2 of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: "4.2 Physical Improvements. In consideration of the CITY'S promises and performances, OWNER agrees to the following: "4.2.1 Off-Site Improvements. Subject to the CITY'S assistance pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5 OWNER shall be solely responsible for funding, acquiring right-of-way, slope easements, rights of entry, temporary construction easements, as well as constructing all improvements identified in Attachment 5, as modified by Section 4.2.1.1. "4.2.1.1 Phase II Improvements. A. As used in this Section 4.2.1.1, "Phase II Property Owners" shall mean the owners of the Phase II Property and their successors and assigns. B. The Phase II Property Owners hereby acknowledge and agree that on-site and off-site improvements required for Phase I of the Roripaugh Ranch Project as described in Attachment 5 have been completed, or are secured with construction pending or in progress, and that the Phase 11 Owners shall not have any responsibility for the Phase I Improvements. 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 3 C. Attachment 5 is hereby amended by deleting the text, descriptions and building permit release thresholds for the Phase II Improvements and replacing the text, descriptions and building permit release thresholds for the Phase II improvements with Attachment 5-A to this Third Amendment. D. Subject to the CITY'S assistance pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5, the Phase 11 Property Owners shall be responsible for funding, designing, obtaining required all applicable permits, including, without limitation, resource agency permits, acquiring rights-of-way, slope easements, rights of entry, temporary construction easements, as well as constructing all of the Phase 11 Improvements as identified and described in Attachment 5-A, Phase 11 Improvements and Schedule. Phase II Property Owners, agree that to the extent the costs of said Phase 11 Improvements exceeds available proceeds from duly authorized community facility district bonds issued by the City and secured by a special tax on the Project Site or the Phase 11 Properties, or both, pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5, Wingsweep Corporation, a California corporation ("Wingsweep"), and its successors and assigns, shall pay ten percent(10%) of such costs and Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("RVR') shall pay ninety percent(90%) of such costs. It shall be the responsibility of Wingsweep and RVR to fund the costs of the Phase II Improvements as provided in this subsection as between themselves. E. City shall have no responsibility to fund any of the Phase 11 Improvements except with proceeds from duly authorized and available community facilities district bonds issued by the City and secured by a special tax on the Proj ect Site or the Phase II Properties or both. Further, City shall be under no obligation to issue any building permits pursuant to Attachment 5-A should Wingsweep or RVR fail to contribute their respective shares of the funds required to complete the Phase II Improvements. "4.2.2 On-Site Improvements. OWNER shall be solely responsible for funding, acquiring right-of-way, slope easements, rights of entry, temporary construction easements, as well as all other On-Site improvements necessary to accomplish the Development, in whole or in part." 3. New Attachment 5-A Phase 11 Improvements. A new Attachment 5-A, Phase II Improvements and Schedule, is hereby added to the Development Agreement to read as provided in Exhibit D to this Third Amendment. 4. Amendment No. 2 to Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) Shall Constitute a Development Plan Approval. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.6, Wingsweep and RVR each agree that that Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan shall be an amendment to the Development Plan Approvals and that Amendment No. 2 shall constitute for all purposes a Development Plan Approval and shall be treated for Phase 11 as if it were in existence on the Effective Date. 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 4 5. General a. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, as amended by the First and Second Amendments, shall remain in full force and effect. b. This Third Amendment contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, concerning the subject matter hereof. C. The following Exhibits are attached to this Third Amendment and incorporated herein as though set forth in full: Exhibit A Phase II Property Map Exhibit B Wingsweep Property Exhibit C RVR Property Exhibit D New Attachment 5-A to Development Agreement, Phase II Improvements and Schedule 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA, A municipal corporation Michael S. Naggar Mayor Attest: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 6 WINGSWEEP CORPORATION, A California corporation By: Corry Hong President and Chief Executive Officer 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 7 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION LLC A Delaware limited liability company By: Ken Kraemer Operating Manager 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 8 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California ) County of ) On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared_ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 9 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California ) County of ) On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared_, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 10 EXHIBIT A PHASE II PROPERTY MAP 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 11 Exhibit A Phase 2 Property b�R�Tq hOT SpwN�RD I I I 1 I R I ��3'vno:Ev_go o; I z W �� LL n N�COLAS RD 1 II 'p \ iH-60 hpo� 0 z N � 9 °o i0 SOUTH LOOP RD CALLS CHAPUS , 0U 3 z ysrq inEaD ABRUZZO ST �P �ytLE y,T 1 0 500 1,000 Fee[ AT NORTH l y aF snt- 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 12 EXHIBIT B WINGSWEEP PROPERTY 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 13 PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 20,TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 2 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,SHOWN AS"NOT A PART'ON PARCEL MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 1,PAGE 44 OF PARCEL MAPS,RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID"NOT A PART"SOUTH 0"33 55" WEST,974.13 FEET FROM NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;THENCE NORTH 89'26'05"WEST,771.64 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID"NOT A PART"TO A POINT ON TH EAST LINE OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRIC T RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 12"32'02"WEST 1004.04 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID"NOT A PART';THENCE SOUTH 12°32'02'WEST,278.15 FEET ON SAID EAST METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT LINE;THENCE SOUTH 89"26'05"EAST,829.32 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID"NOT A PART"SOUTH 0"33'55" WEST,1246.2.4 FEET FROM SAID NORTHEAST CORNER;THENCE NORTH 0'33'55"E-AST,272.11 FEET ON SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 20,TOWNSI IIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 2 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT (HEREOF,SHOWN AS"NOTA PART"AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1,PAGES 44,45 AND 46 OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID"NOT A PART"SOU'I I10'33'55"WEST,1,246.24 FEET FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID"NOT A PART";THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0° 33'55"WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 375.50 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE NORTH 89`26,05" WEST 904 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 24,1968,AS INSTRUMENT NO.37774,OFFICIAL RECORDS,SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO MATCHAM RLALIY BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1971,AS INSTRUMENT N0,120094,OFFICIAL RECORDS;THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 12"32' 02"EAST(RECORDED NORTH 12°34'14"EAST)383.24 FEET TO A POINT THAT 15 SOUTH 12"32'02" WEST(OF RECORD SOUTH 12"34'14"WEST)1,282.19 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID"NOT A PART";THENCE SOUTH 89°26'05"EAST 829.32 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND,IN THE TEMECULA,COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED"NOT A PART"ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 44 OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY BEING A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 20,TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 2 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 20 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP IN BOOK 1,PAGE 44;THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION SOUTH 0°33'55"WEST,1,621,74 FFFT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING SOU 1N 0°33'55"WEST,98.5 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89"26'05"WEST 928 FEET,MORE 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 14 OR LESS,TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 24,1968,AS INSTRUMENT NO.37774,OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;THENCEALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTI112'32'02'EAST,(RECORDED NORTH 12'34'14'EAST)100 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO AN INTERSECTION ON A LINE BEARING NORTH 89°26'05"WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 89°26'05"EAST 904 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 0: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 21,TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 2 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 DISTANT SOUTH 0°34'31"WEST 145.18 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST SECTION LINE SOUTH 04 34'31"WEST 1174.62 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST SECTION LINE SOUTH 0'33'47"WEST 2350.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1600.00 FEET,A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 89" 26'13"WEST;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 1052,56 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37'41'32";THENCE NORTH 38"15'19"EAST 663.55 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1600.00 FEET;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 1052.03 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°40,23"; THENCE NORTH 0°34'56"EAST 351,16 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2000.00 FEET;THENCE NORTHERLY 102.01 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2"55'21";THENCE SOUTH 87"37'47"WEST 235:41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3000.00 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY 175.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°12'16";THENCE NORTH 0' V47"EAST 629,08 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 88°34'20"WEST 660.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCELS A,B,C AND D ARE NOW DESCRIBED AS: LOTS 1,3.4.5,6,H AND K OF TRACT NO.29353-2,FILED SEPTEMBER 28,2003 IN BOOK 342,PAGE 73 OF MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA. 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 15 EXHIBIT C RVR PROPERTY Real Property in the City of Tula, County of Riverside, State of Califarui _ described as follows: PARCEL A: LOTS 7 THROTJGH 11 AND LETTERED LOTS "L" "J"AND"L"OF TRACT 29353-2,I THE CITY OF TEIVIECUL., COUNTY OF M-TRSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNLA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK.34.2 OF NLAPS-PAGE(S)73 THROUGH 85_INCLUSR E, RECORDS OF SAKI) COUNTY- PARCEL B: LOTS 1 T ROUGH 15 AND LETTER LOT "A"OF TRACT 29353,IN THE CITY OF TEMEC"ULA_ COUNTY OF R-1 ERSIDE, STATE OF C.4 LIFORIVIA,AS PER NLAP RECORDED IN BOOK 401 OF I�LA-PS PACES 89 THROUGH 96 LVCLL7Sn'Ee RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. APNs: 964-180-W4-6 (Affects Lot 7 of Parcel A) 964-180 C5-7 (Affects Lot 8 of Parcel A) 96 180-M7-9 (Affects Lot 10 of Parcel A.) 964-180S-0 (Affects Lot 11 ofParcel.k) 9M-18M17-8 (Affects Lot 1 of Parcel B) 964-18001 8-9 (Affects Lot 2 of Parcel B) 964-180019-0 (Affects Lot 3 of Parcel B) 964-180-020-0 (Aff'ec.ts Lots#of Parcel B) 964-180-021-1 (Aff€xts Lot 5 of Parcel B) 964-180-022-2 (.Aff'e~cts Lot 6 of Parcel B) 964-180-023-3 (Affects Lot 7 of Parcel B) 964-180-0244 (Affects Lot 8 of Parcel B) 964-180-025-5 (Affects Lot 9 of Parcel B) 964-1800226-6 (Affects Lot 10 of Parcel B) 964-180-027-7 (Affects Lot 11 of Parcel B) 964-180-028-8 (Affects Lot 12 of Parcel B) 964-180029-9 (Affects Lot 13 of Parcel B) 964-180-030-9 (Affects Lot 14 of Parcel B) 964-180031-0 (Affects Lot 15 of Parcel B) 964-180-033-2 (Affects Lot 9 of Parcel A) 964-180034-3 (Affects Lot J of Parcel A) 964-180036-5 (Affects Lot L of Parcel A) 964-180037-6 (Affects Lot I of Parcel A) 964-18M32-1 (Affects Lot A of Parcel B) 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 16 EXHIBIT D NEW ATTACHMENT 5-A TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS AND SCHEDULE 1. Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 A. Description of Public Improvement. Acquire all right-of-way, complete engineering design, and construct Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 to the intersection with Rancho California Road. Construction will include intersection and traffic signal improvements at Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Road and landscaping of the center medians of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 improvements. When appropriate warrants are met, Owners of Phase II shall contribute a fair share contribution towards the installation of a traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way and related intersection improvements as provided in Section 2.2.6, Phasing of Road Improvements, of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and more specifically, Table 2-3 and Paragraph 4 on page 2-22 of the Specific Plan. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Complete Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements prior to issuance of 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, excluding the installation of center median landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Complete center median landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 prior to the issuance of the 500th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. C. Responsibility. The City shall construct the Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements using Remaining CFD funds, excluding the installation of landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 shall be constructed by the Owners of Phase 11 Property. (As used in this Attachment 5-A, the term "Remaining CFD funds" shall mean available bond proceeds from duly authorized community facility district bonds issued by the City and secured by a special tax on the Project Site or the Phase II Properties, or both, pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5.) 2. Traffic Signal, Road, and Intersection Acquisition Fee A. Description of Public Improvement. Establish an on and offsite traffic signal, road and intersection acquisition fee. The fee amount will be determined by the City based on cost estimates provided by the Owners of Phase 11 Property and fees will be collected by the City at the time of building permit issuance. The City will determine when the improvements are required to be installed. The Constructing Party will be 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 17 reimbursed upon acceptance of the completed improvements by the City. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. The on and offsite traffic signals, roads, and intersections to which the Acquisition Fee will be applied are: • Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos • Nicolas Road at Winchester Road B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II shall provide cost estimates and fee basis to the Director of Public Works for approval prior to issuance of 1 st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. The City shall collect the approved fee amount at issuance of each Building Permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 starting with the 1st building permit. The ultimate signal modifications and associated improvements at the Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection shall be operational prior to the issuance of the 26th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The timing of the installation for the remaining traffic signals and intersection improvements shall be as determined by the City Director of Public Works, and shall not be an unreasonable time-schedule. The Constructing Party will be reimbursed upon acceptance of the completed improvements by the City. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfa117 C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 3. Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering design and construct full Nicolas Road improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection. The City will use the Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, to construct the improvements from the approved plan as a City-sponsored project. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. Owners of Phase II Property shall be required, on behalf of the City, to provide for all required engineering design, construction plans, CEQA analysis & processing, environmental mitigation measures, right-of-way acquisition, and to obtain all necessary Resource Agency and Riverside County Flood 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 18 Control and Water Conservation District permits. Costs of design, mitigation, project management and construction will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds, with priority to the costs of construction. Costs of right-of-way acquisition will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds upon completion of the required acquisition. The approved plan shall include all utility, drainage, flood control, bridge, and intersection improvements necessary for the roadway connection. Resource Agency permits for the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection should be combined with the permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road and processed and obtained as a single package. Upon review of final design plans and estimates by the City, the City shall determine a security amount corresponding to the then current engineering cost estimates plus design, mitigation and right-of-way acquisition costs, costs of construction and contingencies for both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. Owners of Phase II Property shall post a letter of credit with the City, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the security amount. The City shall release the letter of Credit upon the occurrence of one of the following events: (1) Completion of the construction of both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing as required by this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works; or(2) additional proceeds from new CFD bonds are approved and available so that the remaining CFD funds are sufficient to complete both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. After determination of the security amount, any remaining CFD funds in excess of the security amount may then be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash channel improvements. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Offsite Segment(Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection to Phase II Boundary). The Owners of Phase 11 Property shall submit 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 19 complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals on behalf of the City, together with the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, to allow for start of the City-sponsored project prior to issuance of the 2001h building permit for the Phase 11 Property. If, however, the Owners of Phase II Property are unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11, the Owners of Phase II Property may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits, up to a total 522 building permits prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits. 3. City shall construct Nicolas Road from the western Project boundary to Calle Girasol Owners of Phase II Property shall construct Nicolas Road Improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to western Project boundaries as described in this Section with the Park-n-Ride/Equestrian Staging Area, which is required to be constructed prior to the 1st building permit for Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. Owners of the Phase 11 Property shall construct a barricade and turn-around acceptable to the Fire Department on Nicolas Road at the boundary of the Phase II Property to remain in place until full Nicolas Road improvements are made from Calle Girasol to the western project boundary and Butterfield Stage Road. C. Responsibility. City, Owners of Phase II Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated between Owners of Phase II Property as noted in item #18 herein below. 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 20 4. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the improvements upstream and downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road from the plans approved by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(RCFC&WCD). Both upstream and downstream improvements must be constructed concurrently. Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, above the security amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol improvements may be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek channel improvements. Permanent maintenance of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of the RCFC&WCD. City of Temecula, as the underlying property owner, will cooperate to remove the existing Restrictive Covenant on the land, and to grant fee ownership to the RCFC&WCD for permanent maintenance. Resource Agency permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and the improvements are off site. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements permits downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road should be combined with the permits for Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection and processed and obtained as a single package. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals, together with the Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, prior to issuance of the 200th building permit within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. If, however, Owners of Phase II Property is unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, Owners of Phase II Property 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 21 may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, up to a total of 522 building permits within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 5. Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements from the plans approved by RCFC&WCD and/or City of Temecula. Construction shall include the bridge abutments for the Pedestrian Bridge. Remaining CFD funds above the security amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol and Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements may be applied to Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements. Permanent maintenance of the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or other maintenance entity reasonably approved by the City of Temecula. As used in this Attachment 5A, "Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA," shall mean a homeowners association duly incorporated under the laws of the State of California for the purposes, among others, of maintaining the various public and private improvements as provided in the Development Agreement and funding such maintenance obligations. There shall only be one HOA for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II maintenance obligations in a form reasonably approved by the Director of Community Development and City Attorney, provided, however, that this HOA may provide for special benefit zones to fund maintenance obligations as approved by the Director of Public Works. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall construct Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in a Planning Area draining into the channel (i.e., Planning Areas 17 through 31). 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 22 C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 6. Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQMP) A. Description of Public Improvement. As needed, each Owner of Phase II Property shall submit a WQMP Amendment covering its ownership to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) and City for review and comment. The WQMP Amendments shall address both construction and occupancy of the project. The amended WQMPs shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit WQMP Amendments covering their respective ownerships to the SDRWQCB and City for review and comment prior to any additional approval of plans, issuance of permits, and/or grading of each Party's site. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, individually by Planning Area. 7. Remaining Public Improvements & Landscaping—Major Roadways A. Description of Public Improvement. The Owners of Phase 2 Property shall complete the public improvements, including sidewalks, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, along the frontage of major roadways adjacent to each Planning Area in their respective ownerships, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. This requirement will pertain to the following major roadways: • Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road • Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street) • Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) • Nicolas Road • North Loop Road • South Loop Road In the event that sidewalks along the above streets are not continuous, the Owners of Phase II Property shall provide an all-weather pedestrian path of travel to ensure continuous pedestrian circulation. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall each complete the public improvements and landscaping including sidewalk, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, adjacent to their frontage on major roadways, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, prior to the 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 23 issuance of the 1st building permit in each adjacent Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 8. Permanent Maintenance of Parkway Landscaping—Landscape Maintenance Master Plan A. Description of Public Improvement. Although originally intended to be maintained by the TCSD, permanent maintenance of slopes and parkways along the frontage of major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. Owners of Phase II Property shall each prepare and submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan to the Community Development Director for review and comment covering all public and private open space areas, parks, slopes, parkways, etc., and especially slopes and parkways along their frontage on major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, which will not be maintained by individual commercial or residential property owners. The Landscape Maintenance Master Plan(s) shall show the locations of any necessary water meters and electrical meters, together with the permanent maintenance entity for each area. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan for their respective ownerships to the Community Development Director for review and comment prior to the 1st building permit in each Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property. 9. North and South Loop Roads— Complete Engineering and Landscape Architectural Design A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering and landscape architectural design as public roadways, with: • narrow roadway pavement widths consistent with current City design criteria; • traffic calming measures including measures to address traffic to/from Sports Park(Planning Area 27), Secondary School (Planning Area 28) and Elementary School (Planning Area 29) such as a traffic round-about on the North Loop Road easterly of Planning Area 29; • water quality measures addressing runoff from the roadway pavement and parkway areas; 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 24 • areas with widened parkways, meandering sidewalks or trails, variations in wall locations and type, or other design features intended to create unique character and visual appeal; and • a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Submit design to the Public Works Director and Community Development Director for approval. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete engineering design of the North and South Loop Roads, and a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development, and submit for approval to the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete landscape architectural design of the North and South Loop Roads and submit for approval to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 10. Sports Park (Planning Area 27)— Complete Design & Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Update design of the Sports Park with: • water quality measures addressing runoff from impervious areas and incorporating Low Impact Development(LID)Best Management Practices (BMPs), in accordance with the amended W QMP; • unnecessary turf areas converted to drought tolerant plant materials; • fescue turf soccer fields converted to synthetic turf, • design of tot lot and playground updated to the latest Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards; • proposed site lighting converted to more efficient LED lighting; • pre-wiring for security cameras for each major use area (parking lot, ball fields, restrooms, etc.) and provision of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) system; and 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 25 • approval of the sports field lighting design by the Community Services Director, and, if required, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Authority, with the intent of minimizing the impacts of lighting on the surrounding community, • connection to the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash and potential connection to the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian, and Trailhead facility in Planning Area 33B, • conversion of the proposed ball field to a 90' infield/325' outfield. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design to the Community Services Director and Public Works Director for approval. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11, the Owners of Phase II Property shall update the Sports Park design, and submit plans for approval to the Community Services and Public Works Directors. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall construct the Sports Park and the City shall accept the park, prior to issuance of the 1200' building permit in Roripaugh Ranch, that number including Roripaugh Ranch Phase I. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated on the basis of the City of Temecula's typical parks fee methodology. 11. Private Recreation Center (Planning Area 30)—Use Analysis, Design Development, and Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform a recreational use analysis to guide design development of the Private Recreation Center, optimum location within Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and to form the basis for fair share construction and maintenance fiscal contribution decisions by the Owners of Phase II Property. Perform design development based on the recreational use analysis and submit to the Community Development Director for approval. Design development drawings and documents must be sufficient to understand recreational uses, conceptual architecture, construction costs and maintenance/operational costs. Permanent maintenance of the Private Recreation Center shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR and/or Wingsweep shall perform a recreational use analysis, design development, and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to the 1st building 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 26 permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. Prior to the issuance of the 300th the schedule for completion of construction of the Private Recreation Center shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. C. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 12. Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash. Bridge abutments to be constructed with Long Valley Wash channel construction. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR shall construct the Pedestrian Bridge prior to issuance of the 75th building permit for Planning Areas 22, 23, and 24. C. Responsibility. RVR, individually. 13. Multi-Use Trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, & 21 —Design Development A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform design development of the 15' wide Multi-Use Trail intended to provide a trail in Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 along their southerly boundary, then crossing Long Valley Wash to connect to Planning Area 19 and along its easterly boundary and connecting to properties to the east. Due to changed conditions, trail access into Planning Area 13 has been precluded, crossing of Long Valley Wash may only be accomplished at the easterly Loop Road crossing and introduction of the Wine Country Sewer provides additional opportunity for alternate trail alignment. Design development shall include: • measures to screen onsite and offsite homes from the trail on an "as-needed" basis; • measures to provide for safe crossing at the easterly Loop Road crossing of Long Valley Wash; • consideration of connection to properties to the east at Calle Contento, in the alignment of the Wine Country Sewer, as opposed to an alignment through Planning Area 19 to connect to Planning Area 13; • consideration of any potential connection of the trail alignment through Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 to properties to the south or to the west across Butterfield Stage Road, or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities required to be constructed in Planning Area 33B. If safe and reasonably useful connections from Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 20 to such properties or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities cannot be expected, then 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 27 alternate alignments, such as trail crossing facilities at Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road, and/or use of the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash shall be considered in the design development instead; • a Phasing Plan for construction of the multi-use trail in segments to allow for its early construction as well as orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design development to the Community Development Director for approval. Permanent maintenance of the Multi-Use Trail shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall perform design development of the Multi-Use Trail and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. The Multi-Use Trail may be constructed in phases, in accordance with the approved Design. In each Planning Area, the Multi-Use Trail shall be constructed prior to issuance of the 1st building permit(excluding Model Home permits)in the Planning Area. C. Responsibility. Costs allocated in the future based on Planning Area ownership (i.e. trail costs within each Planning Area will be borne by the owner of that Planning Area). 14. Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, Trailhead in Planning Area 33B A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete design and construct the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities, in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail design development and the requirements of the City. Permanent maintenance of and providing utilities for the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, and Trailhead in Planning Area 33B shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. Maintenance of the sites for Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities and the facilities during construction shall be the responsibility of the Owners of Phase II. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete design and construct the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 28 design development and the requirements of the City, prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, 31 and 33A. Prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, 31 and 33A, the Owners of Phase 11 Property shall also complete the design and construction of the portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the MWD easement, including necessary temporary turn-around geometrics to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The design and construction of this portion of Nicolas Road must be coordinated and consistent with the engineering design and construction of Nicolas Road (Item #3 of this Attachment 5-A). C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 15. Fire Protection Plans A. Description of Public Improvement. Submit plans for structural protection from vegetation fires to the City of Temecula Fire Department. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Fire Protection Plan for their respective areas for approval by the City of Temecula Fire Department prior to the approval of the Tentative Tract/Parcel Map in each of their respective ownerships. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, individually by Planning Area. 16. Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street)— Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Roripaugh Valley Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the access for the Neighborhood Park(Planning Area 6) shall be installed prior to the acceptance of the Neighborhood Park by the City. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. If not already completed with the construction of the Neighborhood Park(Planning Area 6), Owners of Phase 11 Property shall complete the Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Area 11. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 29 17. Fiesta Ranch Road (`B" Street) Improvements —Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements from Nicolas Road to Roripaugh Valley Road. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete the Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Area 12. C. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 18. On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities— Proportional Cost Sharing. A. Description of Public Improvement. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall share the costs to complete the design, planning, government agency permit approvals, construction and implementation of all of the On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities per the items above on a proportional basis. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. Not Applicable. C. Responsibility. As costs are incurred, The Owners of Phase II Property shall each pay their agreed upon proportional share of said approved costs. RVR's proportionate share shall be ninety percent(90%). Wingsweep's proportionate share shall be ten percent(10%). 11086-0097\1902902v4.doc 2-22-2016 30 STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: February 17, 2016 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Case Planner APPLICANT NAME: Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC and Wingsweep Corporation PROJECT Planning Application Numbers PA14-0051 and PA15-1664, a SUMMARY: Development Agreement Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement and portions of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. These changes would allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements which are required by the existing approvals for the Phase II area of Roripaugh Ranch. The areas of the Specific Plan affected by the proposed modifications are generally situated along both sides of Butterfield Stage Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the north and just south of Calle Chapos to the south. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase II builders, but would affect the timing of construction for certain improvements. Proposed changes to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan include only those changes necessary for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. CEQA: Addendum to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval BACKGROUND SUMMARY The approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (RRSP) allows for the development of 2,015 residential units on 804.7 acres, including 1,056 low and low medium density single-family units, and 959 medium density single family units. The RRSP also allows development of 15.4 acres (110,000 square feet) of commercial uses, a 22-acre elementary school site, a 20-acre middle school site, a 5.1-acre neighborhood park, a 19.7-acre community park with lighted athletic fields, 9.1 acres of private recreational facilities, 202.7 acres of biological habitat, 56.6 acres of flood control and landscaped slope areas, and a 2-acre fire station. At build out, the project would have a gross density of 2.5 units per total acre and a net density of 4.88 units per residential acre. The project is required to construct a number of improvements, including R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 1 regional and local roads such as Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Nicolas Road, and major sewer, water and drainage facilities. Planning Application PA14-0051 is a Development Agreement Amendment to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement. These changes would allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements identified in Exhibit C (attached) which are required by the existing approvals for the Phase I I area of Roripaugh Ranch. The Phase II area of the RRSP is generally situated along both sides of Butterfield Stage Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the north and just south of Calle Chapos to the south. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase II builders, but would affect the timing of construction for the improvements identified in Exhibit C. Planning Application PA15-1664 is a Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. No Specific Plan changes are proposed beyond those necessary for consistency between the proposed Development Agreement Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed Development Agreement Amendment only proposes to modify the timing requirements for certain improvements as identified below. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase II builders. Proposed changes to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan include only those changes necessary for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. Items No. 1 through 18 below provide the proposed improvement timing threshold changes and the thresholds per the existing Development Agreement: 1. Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 A. Description of Public Improvement. Acquire all right-of-way, complete engineering design, and construct Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 to the intersection with Rancho California Road. Construction will include intersection and traffic signal improvements at Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Road and landscaping of the center medians of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 improvements. When appropriate warrants are met, Owners of Phase II shall contribute a fair share contribution towards the installation of a traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way and related intersection improvements as provided in Section 2.2.6, Phasing of Road Improvements, of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and more specifically, Table 2-3 and Paragraph 4 on page 2-22 of the Specific Plan. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. Complete Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements prior to issuance of 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, excluding the installation of center median landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Complete center median landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 2 and Phase 3 prior to the issuance of the 500th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Same as proposed building permit release schedule. The purpose of modification to this item is to clearly state construction and funding responsibility for this improvement. D. Responsibility. The City shall construct the Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3 improvements using Remaining CFD Funds, excluding the installation of landscaping for Butterfield Stage Road, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Landscaping improvements for Butterfield Stage Road Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 shall be constructed by the Owners of Phase II Property. (As used in this Attachment 5-A, the term "Remaining CFD Funds" shall mean available bond proceeds from duly authorized community facility district bonds issued by the City and secured by a special tax on the Project Site or the Phase II Properties, or both, pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5.) 2. Traffic Signal, Road, and Intersection Acquisition Fee A. Description of Public Improvement. Establish an on and offsite traffic signal, road and intersection acquisition fee. The fee amount will be determined by the City based on cost estimates provided by the Owners of Phase II Property, and fees will be collected by the City at the time of building permit issuance. The City will determine when the improvements are required to be installed. The Constructing Party will be reimbursed upon acceptance of the completed improvements by the City. Owners of Phase II Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. The on and offsite traffic signals, roads, and intersections to which the Acquisition Fee will be applied are: • Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road • Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos • Nicolas Road at Winchester Road B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II shall provide cost estimates and fee basis to the Director of Public Works for approval prior to issuance of 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The City shall collect the approved fee amount at issuance of each building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II starting with the 1St building permit. The ultimate signal modifications and associated improvements at the Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection shall be operational prior to the issuance of the 26th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The timing of the installation for the remaining traffic signals and intersection improvements shall be as determined by the City Director of Public Works, and shall not be an unreasonable time-schedule. R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 3 C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Several interrelated thresholds required construction of these traffic signals and other related intersection improvements prior to 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. However warrants for traffic signals will not all be met at the same time, and all improvements are not needed until a majority of the units in Phase II are constructed and/or schools or Sports Park are in operation. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 3. Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering design and construct full Nicolas Road improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection. The City will use the Remaining CFD Funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, to construct the improvements from the approved plan as a City- sponsored project. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall be responsible to cover the cost of any shortfall. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall be required, on behalf of the City, to provide for all required engineering design, construction plans, CEQA analysis & processing, environmental mitigation measures, right-of-way acquisition, and to obtain all necessary Resource Agency and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District permits. Costs of design, mitigation, project management and construction will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds, with priority to the costs of construction. Costs of right-of-way acquisition will be eligible for reimbursement from the CFD funds upon completion of the required acquisition. The approved plan shall include all utility, drainage, flood control, bridge, and intersection improvements necessary for the roadway connection. Resource Agency permits for the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the offsite portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection should be combined with the permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road and processed and obtained as a single package. Upon review of final design plans and estimates by the City, the City shall determine a security amount corresponding to the then current engineering cost estimates plus design, mitigation and right-of-way acquisition costs, costs of construction and contingencies for both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. Owners of Phase 11 Property shall post a letter of credit with the City, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the Security Amount. The City shall release the letter of Credit upon the occurrence of one of R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 4 the following events: (1) Completion of the construction of both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing as required by this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works; or (2) additional proceeds from new CFD bonds are approved and available so that the Remaining CFD funds are sufficient to complete both the Nicolas Road Improvements as described in this Section and the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements described in Section 4 of this Attachment 5-A associated with the Nicolas Road crossing. After determination of the Security Amount, any Remaining CFD Funds in excess of the security amount may then be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash channel improvements. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Offsite Segment (Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection to Phase II Boundary). The Owners of Phase II Property shall submit complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals on behalf of the City, together with the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, to allow for start of the City- sponsored project prior to issuance of the 200th building permit for the Phase II Property. If, however, the Owners of Phase II Property are unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, the Owners of Phase II Property may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits, up to a total 522 building permits prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits. 3. City shall construct Nicolas Road from the western Project boundary to Calle Girasol Owners of Phase II Property shall construct Nicolas Road Improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to western Project boundaries as described in this Section with the Park-n-Ride/Equestrian Staging Area, which is required to be constructed prior to the 1st building permit for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Owners of the Phase II Property shall construct a barricade and turn-around acceptable to the Fire Department on Nicolas Road at the boundary of the Phase II Property. R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 5 C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Several interrelated thresholds originally required construction of Nicolas Road in phases, with some phases to be constructed prior to building permit issuance in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 1. The thresholds were subsequently modified through Operating Memorandum. The full completion of utility, drainage, flood control, bridge and intersection improvements necessary for the roadway connection were required to be completed prior to the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. D. Responsibility. City, Owners of Phase II Property. Shortfall costs to be allocated between Owners of Phase II Property as noted in item #18 herein below. 4. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the improvements upstream and downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road from the plans approved by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). Both upstream and downstream improvements must be constructed concurrently. Remaining CFD funds, after the funding of Butterfield Stage Road Phase 3, above the Security Amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol improvements may be applied to Santa Gertrudis Creek channel improvements. Permanent maintenance of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of RCFC&WCD. City of Temecula, as the underlying property owner, will cooperate to remove the existing Restrictive Covenant on the land, and to grant fee ownership to RCFC&WCD for Permanent Maintenance. Resource Agency permits for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road were not obtained with the Resource Agency permits for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and the improvements are off site. Due to Resource Agency regulations, the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements permits downstream of the existing culverts at Butterfield Stage Road should be combined with the permits for Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection and processed and obtained as a single package. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit complete engineering design plans, including initial application for Resource Agency permits and RCFC&WCD approvals, for approval by the City Director of Public Works prior to issuance of the 1st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. Owners of Phase II Property shall make good faith efforts to acquire any required regulatory agency permits/approvals, together with the Nicolas R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 6 Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the Calle Girasol/Nicolas Road Connection regulatory agency permits/approvals as a package, prior to issuance of the 200th building permit within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. If, however, Owners of Phase II Property is unsuccessful in obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals within a reasonable timeframe to allow orderly development of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, Owners of Phase II Property may petition the Director of Public Works to allow issuance of additional sequential phases of 100 building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property, up to a total of 522 Building Permits within the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II property prior to obtaining the required regulatory agency permits/approvals. After 50 of each additional phase of 100 building permits have been issued, the Director of Public Works shall determine, using ordinary and reasonable criteria, if sufficient progress has been made in obtaining the regulatory agency approvals for the City to issue the next additional phase of building permits for the Roripaugh Ranch Phase I I property. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. As previously modified by Operating Memorandum, construction of Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements is required prior to issuance of the 1s' building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase 11 Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 5. Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements from the plans approved by RCFC&WCD and/or City of Temecula. Construction shall include the bridge abutments for the Pedestrian Bridge. Remaining CFD Funds above the security amount determined by the City for Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol and Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements may be applied to Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements Permanent maintenance of the Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or other maintenance entity approved by the City of Temecula. As used in this Attachment 5A, "Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 HOA," shall mean a homeowners association duly incorporated under the laws of the State of California for the purposes, among others, of maintaining the various public and private improvements as provided in the Development Agreement and funding such maintenance obligations. There shall only be one HOA for Roripaugh Ranch Phase 11 maintenance obligations in a form approved by the Director of Community Development and City Attorney, provided, however, that this HOA may provide for special benefit zones to fund maintenance obligations as approved by the Director of Public Works. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase 11 Property shall construct Long Valley Wash Channel Improvements prior to issuance of the R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 7 1" building permit in a Planning Area draining into the channel (i.e., Planning Areas 17 thru 31). C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Several interrelated thresholds require the design, maintenance agreements, Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMAR)/Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) processes and/or construction of components of Long Valley Wash channel Improvements prior to rough grading, building permits and/or occupancy of units. Essentially, construction of the channel improvements was required prior to the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 6. Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQMP) A. Description of Public Improvement. As needed, each Owner of Phase II Property shall submit a WQMP Amendment covering its ownership to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) and City for review and comment. The WQMP Amendments shall address both construction and occupancy of the project. The amended WQMPs shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit WQMP Amendments covering their respective ownerships to the SDRWQCB and City for review and comment prior to any additional approval of plans, issuance of permits, and/or grading of each Party's site. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Submittal of a WQMP to the RWQCB was required prior to the issuance of any grading permit. A WQMP for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II was submitted, but submittal of amendments will be required by the City prior to any additional approval of plans, issuance of permits, and/or grading of each Party's site. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 7. Remaining Public Improvements & Landscaping — Major Roadways A. Description of Public Improvement. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete the public improvements, including sidewalks, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, along the frontage of major roadways adjacent to each Planning Area in their respective ownerships, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. This requirement will pertain to the following major roadways: • Murrieta Hot Springs Road • Butterfield Stage Road • Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street) • Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) • Nicolas Road • North Loop Road R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 8 • South Loop Road In the event that sidewalks along the above streets are not continuous, the Owners of Phase II Property shall provide an all-weather pedestrian path of travel to ensure continuous pedestrian circulation. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall each complete the public improvements and landscaping including sidewalk, parkway landscaping, raised landscaped median landscaping, perimeter walls and street lighting, adjacent to their frontage on major roadways, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, prior to the issuance of the 1St building permit in each adjacent Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Completion of public improvements for the listed major roadways were addressed through specific building permit thresholds for each major roadway. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 8. Permanent Maintenance of Parkway Landscaping — Landscape Maintenance Master Plan A. Description of Public Improvement. Although originally intended to be maintained by the TCSD, permanent maintenance of slopes and parkways along the frontage of major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. Owners of Phase II Property shall each prepare and submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan to the Community Development Director for review and comment covering all public and private open space areas, parks, slopes, parkways, etc., and especially slopes and parkways along their frontage on major roadways in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, which will not be maintained by individual commercial or residential property owners. The Landscape Maintenance Master Plan(s) shall show the locations of any necessary water meters and electrical meters, together with the permanent maintenance entity for each area. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Landscape Maintenance Master Plan for their respective ownerships to the Community Development Director for review and comment prior to the 1 St building permit in each Planning Area and/or Tract Map. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. No building permit thresholds currently exist in Development Agreement for a parkway landscape maintenance master plan because these areas were originally intended to be maintained by the TCSD. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property. 9. North and South Loop Roads — Complete Engineering and Landscape Architectural Design R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 9 A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete engineering and landscape architectural design as public roadways, with: • narrow roadway pavement widths consistent with current City design criteria; • traffic calming measures including measures to address traffic to/from Sports Park (Planning Area 27), Secondary School (Planning Area 28) and Elementary School (Planning Area 29) such as a traffic round-about on the North Loop Road easterly of Planning Area 29; • water quality measures addressing runoff from the roadway pavement and parkway areas; • areas with widened parkways, meandering sidewalks or trails, variations in wall locations and type, or other design features intended to create unique character and visual appeal; and • a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Submit design to the Public Works Director and Community Development Director for approval. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete engineering design of the North and South Loop Roads, and a Phasing Plan for construction of the roads to allow for orderly development, and submit for approval to the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete landscape architectural design of the North and South Loop Roads and submit for approval to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Several interrelated thresholds require construction of North and South Loop Road improvements prior to 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 10. Sports Park (Planning Area 27) —Complete Design & Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Update design of the Sports Park with: • water quality measures addressing runoff from impervious areas and incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMPs), in accordance with the amended WQMP; • unnecessary turf areas converted to drought tolerant plant materials; • fescue turf soccer fields converted to synthetic turf; • design of tot lot and playground updated to the latest Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards; R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 10 • proposed site lighting converted to more efficient LED lighting; • pre-wiring for security cameras for each major use area (parking lot, ball fields, restrooms, etc.) and provision of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) system, • approval of the sports field lighting design by the Community Services Director, and, if require , the Riverside County Airport Land Use Authority, with the intent of minimizing the impacts of lighting on the surrounding community; • connection to the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash and potential connection to the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian, and Trailhead facility in Planning Area 3313; and • conversion of the proposed ball field to a 90' infield/ 325' outfield. Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design to the Community Services Director and Public Works Director for approval. B. Building Permit Release Schedule. 1. Prior to the issuance of the 1 st building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, the Owners of Phase II Property shall update the Sports Park design, and submit plans for approval to the Community Services and Public Works Directors. 2. The Owners of Phase II Property shall construct the Sports Park and the City shall accept the park, prior to issuance of the 1200th building permit in Roripaugh Ranch, that number including Roripaugh Ranch Phase I. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Current threshold require completion of the Sports Park prior to the 700th (total) building permit in Roripaugh Ranch. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated on the basis of the City of Temecula's typical parks fee methodology. 11. Private Recreation Center (Planning Area 30) — Use Analysis, Design Development, and Construction and Maintenance Agreement A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform a recreational use analysis to guide design development of the Private Recreation Center, optimum location within Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, and to form the basis for fair share construction and maintenance fiscal contribution decisions by the Owners of Phase II Property. Perform design development based on the recreational use analysis and submit to the Community Development Director for approval. Design development drawings and documents must be sufficient to understand recreational uses, conceptual architecture, construction costs and maintenance/operational costs. Permanent maintenance of the Private Recreation Center shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA. R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 11 B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR and/or Wingsweep shall perform a recreational use analysis, design development, and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. Prior to the issuance of the 300th building permit in Phase II the schedule for completion of construction of the Private Recreation Center shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. C. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Current thresholds required completion of a private recreation center on Planning Area 30 prior to the 800th (total) building permit in Roripaugh Ranch. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 12. Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash A. Description of Public Improvement. Construct the Pedestrian Bridge over Long Valley Wash. Bridge abutments to be constructed with Long Valley Wash channel construction. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. RVR shall construct the Pedestrian Bridge prior to issuance of the 75th building permit for Planning Areas 22, 23, and 24. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Same as proposed building permit release schedule. The purpose of modification to this item is to identify responsibility for this improvement. D. Responsibility. RVR, individually. 13. Multi-Use Trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, & 21 — Design Development A. Description of Public Improvement. Perform design development of the 15' wide Multi-Use Trail intended to provide a trail in Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 22 along their southerly boundary, then crossing Long Valley Wash to connect to Planning Area 19 and along its easterly boundary and connecting to properties to the east. Due to changed conditions, trail access into Planning Area 13 has been precluded, crossing of Long Valley Wash may only be accomplished at the easterly Loop Road crossing and introduction of the Wine Country Sewer provides additional opportunity for alternate trail alignment. Design development shall include: • measures to screen onsite and offsite homes from the trail on an "as- needed" basis; • measures to provide for safe crossing at the easterly Loop Road crossing of Long Valley Wash; • consideration of connection to properties to the east at Calle Contento, in the alignment of the Wine Country Sewer, as opposed to an alignment through Planning Area 19 to connect to Planning Area 13; • consideration of any potential connection of the trail alignment through Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 22 to properties to the south, or to R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 12 the west across Butterfield Stage Road, or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities required to be constructed in Planning Area 33B. If safe and reasonably useful connections from Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 22 to such properties or to the Equestrian and Trailhead Facilities cannot be expected, then alternate alignments, such as trail crossing facilities at Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road, and/or use of the multi-use trails in Long Valley Wash shall be considered in the design development instead; • a Phasing Plan for construction of the multi-use trail in segments to allow for its early construction as well as orderly development of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Owners of Phase II Property shall submit design development to the Community Development Director for approval. Permanent maintenance of the Multi-Use Trail shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall perform design development of the Multi-Use Trail and submit to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. The Multi-Use Trail may be constructed in phases, in accordance with the approved design. In each Planning Area, the Multi-Use Trail shall be constructed prior to issuance of the 1s' building permit (excluding model home permits) in the Planning Area. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Current thresholds require completion of the Multi-Use Trail prior to the 1St building permit in Planning Areas 19, 20, and 21. D. Responsibility. Costs allocated in the future based on Planning Area ownership (i.e. trail costs within each Planning Area will be borne by the owner of that Planning Area). 14. Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, Trailhead in Planning Area 33B A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete design and construct the Park-n- Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities, in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail design development and the requirements of the City. Permanent Maintenance of and providing utilities for the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities, and Trailhead in Planning Area 33B shall be the responsibility of the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II HOA, or as determined in the Landscape Maintenance Master Plans. Maintenance of the sites for Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities and the facilities during construction shall be the responsibility of the Owners of Phase II. R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 13 B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete design and construct the Park-n-Ride, Equestrian Facilities and Trailhead Facilities in accordance with the approved Multi-Use Trail design development and the requirements of the City, prior to issuance of the 1St building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 through 23, 31 and 33A. Prior to issuance of the 1St building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, 31 and 33A, the Owners of Phase II Property shall also complete the design and construction of the portion of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to the MWD easement, including necessary temporary turn-around geometrics to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The design and construction of this portion of Nicolas Road must be coordinated and consistent with the engineering design and construction of Nicolas Road (Item #3 of this Attachment 5-A). C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. The original Development Agreement thresholds required the completion of the Park-n-Ride in Planning Area 11 (Commercial Use) prior to the 1 St building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 thru 23, and 33A. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 moved the facility to Planning Area 33B and added the requirement for an Equestrian Staging Area/Trail Head, but did not specify a revised building permit threshold. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 15. Fire Protection Plans A. Description of Public Improvement. Submit plans for structural protection from vegetation fires to the City of Temecula Fire Department. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. Owners of Phase II Property shall each submit a Fire Protection Plan for their respective areas for approval by the City of Temecula Fire Department prior to the approval of the Tentative Tract/Parcel Map in each of their respective ownerships. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Current thresholds require submittal of a Fire Protection Plan prior to the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, individually by Planning Area. 16. Roripaugh Valley Road ("A" Street) — Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Roripaugh Valley Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the access for the Neighborhood Park (Planning Area 6) shall be installed prior to the acceptance of the Neighborhood Park by the City. R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 14 B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. If not already completed with the construction of the Neighborhood Park (Planning Area 6), Owners of Phase II Property shall complete the Roripaugh Valley Road Improvements prior to the issuance of the 1" building permit in Planning Area 11. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Several interrelated Thresholds required construction of Roripaugh Valley Road improvements in phases: • Prior to completion of the Neighborhood Park (Planning Area 6) • Prior to 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 17. Fiesta Ranch Road ("B" Street) Improvements — Complete Improvements A. Description of Public Improvement. Complete construction of Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements from Nicolas Road to Roripaugh Valley Road. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. The Owners of Phase II Property shall complete the Fiesta Ranch Road Improvements prior to issuance of the 1St building permit in Planning Area 12. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Current thresholds require construction of Fiesta Ranch Road prior to the 1St building permit in Roripaugh Ranch Phase II. D. Responsibility. Owners of Phase II Property, with costs allocated as noted in item #18 herein below. 18. On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities — Proportional Cost Sharing. A. Description of Public Improvement. Owners of Phase II Property shall share the costs to complete the design, planning, government agency permit approvals, construction and implementation of all of the On-site and Off-site infrastructure improvements and facilities per the items above on a proportional basis. B. Proposed Building Permit Release Schedule. Not Applicable. C. Building Permit Release Schedule per the existing Development Agreement. Not Applicable. D. Responsibility. As costs are incurred, The Owners of Phase II Property shall each pay their agreed upon proportional share of said approved costs. RVR's proportionate share shall be ninety percent (90%). Wingsweep's proportionate share shall be ten percent (10%). R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 15 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on February 4, 2016 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff has reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan certified by the City Council on December 24, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, and review of the First Amendment adopted on February 14, 2006 and the Second Amendment adopted on April 23, 2013, the proposed Third Amendment does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendments that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendments are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendments will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map PC Resolution — EIR Addendum, Specific Plan Amendment, and Development Agreement Amendment Exhibit A— CC Resolution — EIR Addendum Exhibit B — CC Resolution —Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit C — CC Ordinance —Third Amendment to the Development Agreement Notice of Public Hearing R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2016\021716\PA14-0051 PA15-1664(sf)\PC\0-PC Staff Report short version-for merge.docx 16 PC RESOLUTION EIR ADDENDUM, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 97121030)", ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 15-1664)", AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14- 0051)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") on December 24, 2002. B. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11) was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. 1 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific (SP 11) was approved on January 11, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". C. On November 5, 2015, Ken Kraemer filed Planning Application No. 15- 1664, a Specific Plan Amendment to amend the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. Planning Application PA15-1664 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The City of Temecula ("City"), a general law city in the State of California and Ashby USA, LLC entered into a Development Agreement on December 17, 2002 for the development of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan ("Development Agreement"). A First Amendment to the Development Agreement was adopted on February 14, 2006 and a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement was adopted on April 23, 2013. F. On March 5, 2014, Ken Kraemer filed Planning Application No. PA14- 0051, a Development Agreement Amendment Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. G. Planning Application PA14-0051 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. H. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Applications PA15-1664, Specific Plan Amendment, and PA14-0051, Development Agreement Amendment, and the associated Environmental Impact Report Addendum on February 17, 2016, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application PA15-1664, Specific Plan Amendment and PA14- 0051, Development Agreement Amendment, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve the Applications hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is The City has reviewed the potential impacts of the Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) and the various potential benefits to the City of the Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) and has concluded that Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) is in the best interests of the City. B. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) is consistent with the City's General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof. C. The City has reviewed the potential impacts of the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement and the various potential benefits to the City of the Third Amendment and has concluded that the Third Amendment is in the best interests of the City. D. The Third Amendment to the Development is consistent with the City's General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Agreement Amendment Application: A. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendments that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendments are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and C. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendments will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR: (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Addendum no. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH no. 97121030) for Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 and the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement per Exhibit "A" attached hereto; adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan per Exhibit "B" attached hereto; and adopt an ordinance approving the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement per Exhibit "C" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of February, 2016. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of February: 2016, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.- ABSTAIN: OMMISSIONERS:ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson, Secretary NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing ".. .1989` .. A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA14-0051 and PA15-1664 Applicant: Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC and Wingsweep Corporation Proposal: A Development Agreement Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment to allow for the modification of timing requirements for various improvements required by the existing approvals for the Phase 2 area of Roripaugh Ranch. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase 2 builders, but would affect the timing of construction for certain improvements. The proposed amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan includes only those changes necessary for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan with regard to timing requirements for improvement construction. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based on a completed EIR Addendum. As a result, the Planning Commission will take action on a recommendation that the City Council adopt an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum in compliance with Section 15164 Case Planner: Stuart Fisk, (951) 506-5159 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: February 17, 2016 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. /-1W r NO sa+4r"Gs RE) Project Site _ KYL D GAMIN...IEL0 kI EFER-RD , C� LOOP RD LP�RD NOR w `u SFT p{ SOUTH LOOP RD p 500 1.000 IR SO CONTE �O Fe Notice of Public Hearing The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: PA14-0051 and PA15-1664 Applicant: Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC and Wingsweep Corporation Location: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Phase II—generally located on the east and west sides of Butterfield Stage Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs and Calle Chapos Proposal: Development Agreement and Specific Plan Amendments to modify improvement timing requirements required for Phase 2 of Roripaugh Ranch. The proposed modifications would not change the improvements required of the Phase 2 builders. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment includes only changes necessary for consistency between the Development Agreement and Specific Plan regarding improvement timing requirements. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based on a completed Environmental Impact Report(EIR)Addendum. As a result,the City Council will take action on a recommendation to adopt an EIR Addendum in compliance with CEQA Section 15164 Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by,Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of,which attacks or seeks to set aside,or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to,the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department,41000 Main Street, Monday through Fridayfrom 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Stuart Fisk, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 506-5159. PLACE OF HEARING City Council Chambers 41000 Main Street Temecula, California DATE OF HEARING March 8. 2016 TIME OF HEARING 7:00 PM Public Hearings 16-04 City of Temecula PA14.0051 vv •.r..r..r.a..... • r..r..r. .rwr...i..r..aw..re.�.++r..r+.ess.r.ww...r Project Site ���Rrer LU A HOr S��NGS Rp F N a x� d m U CA4I E CH61? r _ . }-; •' ��yr`wr a� � VISTA.DE�ORO 0 500 1,000 Feet This map was made the City of Temecula Geographic Information System The map is derived fromom base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside NORTH County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map Da[a and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current Information Trig mop;x n01 crdt of ru.nte Geographic IrtfVrmStion Systems JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL , PLANNING COMMISSION , AND OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD Item No . 15 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Planning Commission PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: On January 26, 2016 the City Council approved an amendment to the role and authority of Board and Commission Members, as set forth in the handbook, to include annual joint meetings between the City Council and each board and/or commission. At the annual joint meeting, each board and/or commission will provide a brief overview of the previous year highlights, anticipated activities for the upcoming year, and take further direction from the City Council as necessary. The schedule for the 2016 annual joint meetings is as follows: Planning Commission/Old Town Local Review Board (March 8, 2016), Community Services Commission (March 22, 2016), and Public Traffic/Safety Commission (April 12, 2016). FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No . 16 Approvals �- City Attorney /I Finance Director City Manager (� CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Old Town Local Review Board PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Old Town Local Review Board. BACKGROUND: On January 26, 2016 the City Council approved an amendment to the role and authority of Board and Commission Members, as set forth in the handbook, to include annual joint meetings between the City Council and each board and/or commission. At the annual joint meeting, each board and/or commission will provide a brief overview of the previous year highlights, anticipated activities for the upcoming year, and take further direction from the City Council as necessary. The schedule for the 2016 annual joint meetings is as follows: Planning Commission/Old Town Local Review Board (March 8, 2016), Community Services Commission (March 22, 2016), and Public Traffic/Safety Commission (April 12, 2016). FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None DEPARTMENT REPORTS Item No . 17 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report— March 2016 PREPARED BY: Sue Steffen, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. On March 5, 2016 Council Member Jeff Comerchero traveled to Washington, DC to attend the National League of Cities Congressional Cities Conference. ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Agenda 1 • CONGUSSIONA1 NATIONAL ��Q�yp,L IEAGUj rig LEAGUE CITY CONFFRINCFof ' !�s + "'� oiCITIES CCC -- 2016 5-9, 2016 Conference Workshops Please note: Dates and times are subject to change as the sessions are being finalized. New sessions may also be added Please check back soon for the most up to date session information Monday, March 7, 2016 7:10 am-8:45 am How to Create a Youth Council in Your City Date: ,Track: Location: Want to create a youth council in your city?Youth councils give young people a meaningful role in the decision-making process and give local leaders access to a valuable advisory body. Cities across the country are empowering youth to be valuable resources for crafting successful solutions to community problems. Learn from youth leaders how to promote youth participation in your city. ,; ;i,in"Ni2 San Francisco Youth Council,San Francisco Cif Megan Bird Charlottesville Youth Council,Charlottesville,VA Alex Garcia-Villatoro lVichira Youth Council,Wichita,KS 10:45 am-12:15 pm Breaking the Cycle: Criminal Justice Reform and Reintegration of Offenders Back into City Life Date:Monday,March 7,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite A Despite increasing evidence that large-scale incarceration is not the most effective means of achieving public safety,the trend of incarceration of minor non-violent drug offenders has resulted in overwhelming federal,state and local governments with the burden of funding a rapidly expanding penal system.The cost to our communities--particularly to the social fabric in urban,minority neighborhoods—has been too high. Families have been torn apart,homeless and jobless rates remain high in many of the poorest neighborhoods and the cycle of recidivism keeps many former offenders from re-engaging with society.In this session,examine the proposed legislative changes to the federal criminal justice system and discuss programs that cities can develop to reintegrate non-violent offenders back into the community 10:45 am-12:15 pm Five Years of Funding: The New Transportation Bill Date:Monday.March 1,Track: f_ ,Location:Maryland Suite A B and C Good news:The federal government now has funding streams directly accessible to city leaders for walking,bicycling,roadway improvements, freight,and transit,thanks for the FAST Act. This bill will fund our nation's surface transportation programs for five years.In this session,you'll become familiar with the types of funding available,and be able to better communicate what the FAST Act means for cities to your citizens and colleagues. Patrick Wojahn Mayor,College Park,MD 10:45 am-12:15 pm Post-Industrial Economic Development Date ,Track �<. Location:Virginia A B and C New residents are flocking to urban centers,and vibrant neighborhoods are taking hold in once dormant downtowns and formerly industrialized waterfronts. For local officials,this opportunity comes with its own set of economic development challenges. Countless acres of land from our industrial past remain contaminated,fueling blight and threatening public health. And unchecked redevelopment can leave existing residents cut off from the benefits of community revitalization. This panel will discuss economic development strategies in these and other challenging circumstances. The program will include information on federal programs for land revitalization,such as Brownfields,and other federal incentives that can help. Ron Nirenberg Council Member,Son Antonio,Texas 10:45 am-12:15 pm The Cityrs Role in Climate Change Date:Monday,March 7,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite B Cities are a powerful voice on climate issues,as evidenced by over 400 mayors and elected officials in attendance at the recent UN climate negotiations in Paris.With the recent temporary stay of the Administration's Clean Power Plan,cities will continue to lead the way on climate mitigation,adaptation and resilience.Hear the status of the litigation and learn how cities can continue to make progress on energy efficiency and renewable energy implementation. Gerry Horak Mayor Pro Tem,Ft.Collins,Colorado S.William Becker Executive Director,National Association of Clean Air Agencies,Washington,DC Philip Haddix Program Director,The Solar Foundation,Washington,DC 1:45 pm-3:15 pm Federal Agency Round Robin Date: ,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Marriott Ballroom Salon 1 Here's your chance to find your connection in Washington.Learn from federal agencies who are offering opportunities to cities like yours. Administration officials will be available to answer questions about federal resources,tools,grants,and programs of interest to local governments.You'll engage in facilitated small group discussions with Administration officials and other local elected officials through a series of 20-minute rotations. Moderator:Carolyn Berndt,Program Director for Sustainability,Federal Advocacy,National League of Cities Federal Agencies Represented: ■ U.S.Department of Agneulture Food and Nutrition Service Rural Utilities Service ■ U.S_Department of Commerce Census Bureau Economic Development Administration National Telecommunications and Information Administration • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ■ Corporation for National and Community Service ■ U.S.Department of Education • U.S.Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ■ U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization Office of Sustainable Communities Office of WateriWyland Foundation:National Mayor's Water Challenge for Water Conservation ■ U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Grants.gov • Let's Move!Cities,Towns and Counties ■ U.S.Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency • U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity • U.S.Department of the Interior Office of Youth,Partnership and Service ■ U.S.Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco and Firearms Community Oriented Policing Services ■ U.S.Department of Labor Workforce Investment,Employment and Training Administration Veterans Employment and Training Services • U.S.Department of Transportation ■ U.S.Department of Veterans Affairs Carolyn Berndt Program Direr-for for Sustainability,Federal Advocacy-National League of Cities 1:45pm•3:15 pm Legal Update—"Orders from the Courts" Date:Monday,March 7,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite J Bennett Sandlin Executive Director-Texas Municipal League 1:45 pm-3:15 pm Orders from the Court Date:Monday,March 7,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite A When writing laws,there are always the unintended consequences.A city proscribes rules for road signs and the Supreme Court knocks it down on Free Speech grounds.A city seeks to keep hardened criminals out of public housing but and up lumping crime victims in with the criminals. The Department of Justice and advocacy groups are watchdogs for nearly every city action.This workshop will help you take a second look at some of your ordinances to ensure that they comply with your intended purpose and do not run a foul of Federal imperatives. a l::_, Executive Director-Texas Municipal League 1:45 pm-3:15 pm Your Financial Toolbox Date: Track: Location:Maryland Suite A 8 and C What are your options for funding your next infrastructure project?Get a realistic overview of what it means for your city to take on debt,and understand development finance so you can make wise decisions about spending.This workshop will cover bonds,public finance,tax increment and special district financing,investment tools,trends in development finance,and policy considerations.We're making debt issuance less intimidating and more straightforward in this 101-level session. Tuesday, March 8, 2016 845 am-10:15 am Families in Crisis: Heroin and Opioid Epidemic in Our Neighborhoods Date_Tuesday March 8,Track:2016 Workshops,Location Do you think heroin;opioids are a problem in your city or town?After more than four decades in decline heroin is once again making a strong comeback in many cities and towns across the country--but[his time,addicts come from more affluent suburbanite families Furthermore,Mexican drug cartels pose a significant threat to the safety of our communities In this session,learn how you can help combat the growing epidemic of opioid and heroin overdose in your community and cities across the country 845 am-1015 am Providing Affordable Housing for Your Citizens Date Tuesday.March 8,Track s,Location Maryland Suite A B and C Cities are centers of opportunity,and the most basic opportunity that local leaders can provide is access to safe,decent,affordable housing Good federal housing policies and programs work in concert to serve as a catalyst for growing the middle class Learn how to improve the use of existing federal programs for better outcomes on affordable housing,and how to combine funding streams and attract private investment to close the gap between 'good`and'bad neighborhoods 145 am 10 1 ti am Safe Streets: The Vision Zero Action Plan Date Tuesday.March 8,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite A Imagine zero traffic crashes in your city Cities across the country are adopting-Vision Zero policies aimed at fully eliminating traffic fatalities Vision Zero policies have shown great promise in making our streets safer for all users but there is no one-size fits all approach,and city leaders have raised serious questions about equity You II hear from experts who have successfully implemented Vision Zero policies and can help guide your own efforts tailored to your community Jonathan Rogers ruuiy.-+rwiya�-u�aw�i uepa��mcm ui nm�aywnaiwn Keith Benjamin Communityity Partnerships Routes to School National Partnership Barbara McGann Director,Office of Safety.Energy and Environment U S Department of Transportation 1030 am-1215 pm Communities Changing Together: Integrating Immigrants and Refugees Date Tuesday March ,Track 2016 Workshops,Location Maryland Suites A and B In 2016 cities must be prepared to Integrate and include new residents from all corners of the globe Take a look at key examples of cities that have successfully overcome barriers associated with Immigrant and refugee resettlement and created an environment of acceptance between community natives and transplants You'll get best practices for integration of refugee and Immigrant groups,and get a better understanding of the benefits of welcoming new Americans so you can communicate effectively to your citizens on this timely topic Jill Dusc Councilmember-at-Large,Portland.Oregon 1030 am-1215 pm Creative Transportation in Cities of All Sizes Date Tuesday,March 8,Track:2016 Workshops,Location:Delaware Suite A Many larger titles have seen an explosion In the connectivity cars.trains buses sidewalks and bikes This connectivity is a major dnver in deciding where people want to live and where businesses chose to invest,giving creative cities a major economic competitive advantage Learn from experienced experts on how to use new technology public-private partnerships,open data federal dollars,and thoughtful Investments in Infrastructure to drive critical change In your city 10.30am-1215pm Digital Inclusion:Building A City of the Future for All Date Track 2016 Workshops,Location:Maryland Suite C Access to high-speed Internet and digital literacy are more important than ever for your residents However,that access Is not equally available—and In fact, the number of Americans with a broadband internet connection has dropped over the past year Find out how cities are tackling digital Inclusion challenges in their communities and what federal resources are available to you to make sure that all of your residents are part of the 21st century economy David Luna CouneilJfember,JlesaAZ;1-ice Chair John Burchell Director of State Policy-Google Michael Matimiller Chief Technology Officer-City of Seattle Gwenn Weaver Senior Communications Program Specialist,Broadband LSA.\ational Telecommunications&Information Administration-U.S.Department of Commerce 1030 am-1215 pm Restoring Trust in Community Policing Date i uesday_March 8,Track 2016 Workshops,Location Virginia A B and C Wrth the nse of widespread new technology--particularly social media and smart phones with cameras--police departments have acknowledged the need to create transparency with the public In this session,learn how police departments are building trust and improving citizen engagement by releasing data You'll find out about The Police Foundation's Public Safety Open Data Portal,intended to serve as a central clearinghouse for accessing,visualizing,and analyzing local and national law enforcement and public safety open datasets 1030 am-12:15 pm Water Infrastructure:Navigating Regulations,Financing and Sustainability Dare Tuesday,March 8,Track 2016 Workshops,Location Delaware Suite B Ever-changing environmental rules regulations and mandates can be a lot for local leaders to keep track of Moreover with the impacts of extreme weather events and climate change,cities and water utilities will have to undertake more sustainable water infrastructure solutions Understand how current and forthcoming regulatory actions will affect your planning decisions.as well as how to finance protects that can improve the resilience of your community Susan re Gilson JL Executive Director-National Association of Flood and Storm Water Management Agencies,Washington,DC Dave Richms Council Member,.Ness.Arizona REQUESTS TO SPEAK City Council Meeting 03/08/16 REQUEST TO SPEAK / CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: 03 -69—/,6/7 I wish to speak on: 14 Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/C,{SD/./SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: � A1C- wv m El Agenda Item No. For F-1 Against ❑ (ri A� e Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium �a�n{d state your name for the recoorrd../�/ Name: "°(`� I I� �� Phone Number: / r/�IEC11 �� Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 0 CITY OF TEMECULA Date: I wish to eak on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ICY) n u ` ' Q N i ri CYl+ !I a 6CL Agenda Item No. For E-1 Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and /state your name for the record. It Name: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: C2SCr" I E.V42r-' 1 G -L \ (2 )01 a ,Ac 'E cl 1 Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK -27 CITY OF TEMECULA 989 Date: I wish to speak on: ❑ Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ) ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk pEioE to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: jw':c"r u Ca' Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 / Date: I wish to speak on: Public Commen CITY COUNCIILL CSD/SAR(D,A�/THA/TPFA (Circle One) / Subject: `I ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name forthe /record.. Name: �����/)� I/ /�i� ✓W S Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.