Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
072898 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JULY 28, 1998 - 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 42051 Main Street (APN 922-036-020), 28545 Front Street (APN 922-035-001}, 28677 Front Street (APN 922-045-017), 28735 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-019), 28731 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-016), 28725 Pujol Street {APN 922-062-010), 42291 Sixth Street (APN 922-052-011), no situs (APN 922-053-080), 41830 Sixth Street {APN 922-031-018), 41858 Fifth Street, {APN 922-031-009), 41843 Fifth Street (APN 922-022-010). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/parcels of Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold, Cadeus Properties, Ladanyi, Rutner, Corbin, Ciais, Otto lot, Pelonero, Valencia, and Eppenger. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. 2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at s portion of the Palm Plaza Shopping Center located generally at the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road (APN 910- 300-001, -005, -006. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and KR Palm Plaza, Inc. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. 3. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to three matters of potential litigation. With respect to each matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. R:~Agenda\072898 1 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 98-13 Resolution: No. 98-70 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Prelude Music: Iva Brough Invocation: Pastor Sofia Sadler of Harvester Church of Temecula Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Ford ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts PRES;NTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Native American Indian-Heritage Month Proclamation Certificate of Honor to Carol Scott - 1998 Temecula Good Neighbor Recipient PUBLIC COMMFNTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSIFNT CALENDAR NOTIC; TO THe: PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. R:\Agenda\072898 2 3 4 5 Standard Ordinance AdoDtion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. APl~roval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of June 23, 1998. Resolution Apl;)roving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt. a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Records Destruction AJ~l;)roval RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds; 5.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute a Sub-Recipient Agreement with the Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots) for administration of the 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community DevelopmentBlock Grant Funds. R:\Agenda\072898 3 6 7 8 Accept Substitute Labor and Materials Security in Parcel Map No. 98471-1 (located southwesterly of the intersection of Winchester Road and 7evo Drive RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept the Substitute Labor and Materials security for public street, and water and sewer improvements; R:\Agenda\072898 6.2 Authorize release of the cash deposit which secured Labor and Materials; 6.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. Authorize Deletion of Condition of A[)l;)roval for Street Lighting as Public Improvement Re(iuirement in Tract Nos. 91818. 91891. and ?3583 (Meadowview Area) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELETING CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TRACT NOS. 21818, 21821, AND 23583 WHICH REQUIRED STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION IN THE MEADOWVIEW AREA Accept Public Im;)rovements in Tract No. 91818 subject to City Council Resolution No. 98- deleting Public Street Lighting in the Meadowview Area (westerly of intersection of Via Norte at Kahwea Road) 8.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21818 subject to the approval of City Council Resolution No. 98- which deletes the Condition of Approval requiring Public Street Lighting in the Meadowview area; 8.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten percent (10%) warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period; 8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No. 94134-1 (southeasterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities for street and drainage, and water and sewer system improvements in Tract No. 241 34-1; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 4 10 11 12 13 14 Release Securities for Traffic Signalization Mitigation in Tract Nos. 74131-? and 2413!-3 (northwesterly of Meadows Parkway at Leena Way) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Authorize release of securities for Traffic Signalization Mitigation in Tract Nos. 24131-2 and 24131-3; 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and the Surety. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (within Tract No. 21818 - located westerly of intersection of Via Norte at Kahwea Road) 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21818) Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue - Project No. PW97-31 and the Traffic Signal on Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle North/West - Project PW97-30 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for median islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue - Project No. PW97-21 and the Traffic Signal on Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle North/West - Project PW97-30. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29 13.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW97-29, the traffic signal installation at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas. Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening - Phase I - Project No. PW97-03 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public corfstruction bids for Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening - Project No. PW97-03. R:\Agenda\072898 5 15 Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Storm Drain Iml;)rovements for the Overland Drive Improvements and Margarita Road Street Widening - Project No. PW97-07 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for a portion of Project No. PW97-07, Storm Drain Improvements for the Overland Drive Improvements and Margarita Road Street Widening Project. 16 Encroachment Permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the Old Town Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the Encroachment Permit required by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in the amount of $1,150.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the permit. 17 No Turn on Red 4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. MON - FRI - Northbound Front Street at Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING NO TURN ON RED 4:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON NORTHBOUND FRONT STREET AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD 18 Riverside County library Contract Amendment RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Agreement to provide Library Services (Additional Staff); 18.2 Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $115,000 to fund the Temecula Library Volunteer Coordinator half-time position, and to subsidize funding to maintain the Senior Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions at the fiscal year 1997- 98 level for fiscal year t 998-99. R:\Agenda\072898 6 19 20 Second Reading of C~rdinance No. 98-11 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENTITLED SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 WITH WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-19 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, PASEO DEL SOL BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CAL-PASEO DEL SOL, LLC, SPECIFIC PLAN 219 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0116) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY R:\Agenda~072898 7 TEMECU! A COMMUNITY SFRVIC!=S DISTRICT M!=I=TING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01 Resolution: No. CSD 98-17 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMI=NT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 23, 1998. 2 Landscage Maintenance Contract with California Landscal;)e Maintenance. Inc. for FY1998-99 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $53,014 to cover FY1998-99 contract with California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. to provide landscape maintenance services for City facilities, medians, slopes (south) and sports parks for a seven-week period; R:\Agenda\072898 8 3 2.2 Approve contract amendment in the amount of $1,171 with California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. to provide landscape maintenance services for the additional landscaped area of Presley Development (S-13) for the first seven weeks of FY1998-99. Landscape Maintenance Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape for FY1998-99 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve a contract amendment in the amount of $389,157 with Excel Landscape to provide landscape maintenance services for additional landscaped areas for FY1998-99. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY S;RVICI=S Rr:PORT GENERAL MANAGIrR'S RI=PORT BOARD OF DIRIFCTORS' R!=PORTS ADJOURNMFNT Next regular meeting: August 11, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. City R:\Agenda\072898 9 TEM!=CULA R!=D!=V!=LOPM!=NT AG!:NCY M!=!=TING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 98-01 Resolution: No. RDA 98-14 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 23, 1998. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL - Mayor Roberts JOINT CITY COUNCIL/R!=D!=V!=LOPM!=NT AGFNCY BUSIN!=SS 2 Old Town Construction and Promotion RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Appropriate $30,000 for the projects selected to augment the Old Town Streetscape project budget for mitigation of the impacts of this project on the merchants and general public. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts R:\Agenda\072898 10 DEPARTM!=NTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S R!=PORT AGENCY MEMBERS' RFPORTS ADJOURNMFNT Next regular meeting: August 11, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\072898 11 WINCH!:STI:R HI! ! S FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: No. WHFA 98-02 Resolution: No, WHFA 98-~ 2 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMM;:NT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Winchester Hills Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALr:NDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 14, 1998. AUTHORITY BUSINESS 2 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 98-1 {Winchester Hills) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (WINCHESTER HILLS) R:\Agenda\072898 12 EX!=CUTIVF DIR!=CTOR'S RFPORT AUTHORITY MEMBFRS' REPORTS ADJOURNMFNT Adjourn to the next regular meeting: August 11, 1998, scheduled to follow the Redevelopment Agency meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California R :~,genda\072898 13 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 21 Planning AI;)l~lication No. PA98-0~05 {Pre-7oning and Annexation of,the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas) RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration with a Finding of DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 {Pre-Zoning and Annexation); 21.2 Adopt Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre- Zoning and Annexation); 21.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, PREZONING THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS ESTABLISHING ZONING FOR THESE AREAS AS SPECIFIC PLAN AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 AND SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT B 21.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS REORGANIZING THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CORPORATE-BOUNDARIES OF-THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND SAID AREAS TO INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TO DETACH SAID TERRITORY FROM CSA 143, CSA 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATED AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 R:\Agenda\072898 14 22 Planning Alii}cation No. PA98-0170 {Reneral Plan Amendments} and Planning Ai3.olication No. PA98-0109 (?oning Amendments - Develoi~ment Code and 7oning M~) RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments Development Code and Zoning Map); 22.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914- 811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-8124)01,914-812-002, 914-812-003, AND 914-812-004 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) 22.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-1 AND L-2 ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, RELOCATING THE MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS FROM SECTION 17.24.050.A. TO SECTION 17.24.040.G.3 (ADDED), REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, MODIFYING SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001,914-811-002, 914-811- 003, 914-811-004, 914-8114)05, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914- 8124301, 914-812-002, 914-812-003, AND 914-812-004 FROM VL (VERY~OW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM {LOWqVIEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-090-038 AND 921-090- 039) FROM H {HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY R:\Agenda\072898 15 23 Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition in Eminent Domain of Property for Street Improvement, Road and Highway Purposes in connection with the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Consider adoption of proposed Resolution No. 98- , a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Temecula declaring certain real property necessary for public purposes and authorizing the acquisition thereof in connection with the Overland Drive Overcrossing Project; 23.2 Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this report, take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and consider all of the evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed resolution, which requires a unanimous or 4/Sths vote; 23.3 If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this report, the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolution of Necessity, then the staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt proposed Resolution No. 98- (which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and the following authorize that an eminent domain proceeding be filed to acquire the subject property interests: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 23.4 As to the resolution, if approved, approve a warrant payable to the Clerk of the Court, Riverside County, in the amount of $115,300.O0 for deposit in court to obtain an order for possession of the Palm Plaza, LLC property interests; 23.5 Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. R:\Agenda\072898 16 COUNCIL BUSIN!=SS 24 Ordinance No. 98- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA-FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) AMARITA WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MCCABE ROAD, 2) MONTELEGRO WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MCCABE ROAD, 3) NICOLAS ROAD BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND VIA LOBO, AND 4) LA PAZ STREET BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH 25 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) DEPARTMENTAL RFPORTS CITY MANAGER'S R!=PORT CITY ATTORNEY'S RIrPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: August 11, 1998, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\072898 17 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 23, 1998 CLOS!=D S!=SSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at the northwest corner of La Paz Road and State Route 79, APN 922-190-25 (approximately 3.09 acres). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula, Riverside County and Mike Moramarco. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. 2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition and leasing of real property located at 28497, 28485, 28559 & 28565 Pujol Street. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Affirmed Housing/Temecula Gardens, LLP. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. 3. Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to each matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances. 4. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 42051 Main Street (APN 922-036-020). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Lorraine Clark. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and Roberts. ABSENT: Councilmember: None. PRELUDr: MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Katie Jones. Minutes~)62398 Temecula CiW Council June 23. 1998 INVOCATION The invocation was given by Father Charles Patron of St. Catherine's Catholic Church. ALL;GIANCI= The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero. PRESr:NTATIONS/PROCI AMATIONS Presentation of Government Finance Officers Association Award for 1997-98 Annual Operating Budget Commending Finance Director Roberts as well as Finance Department staff on a job well done, City Manager Bradley presented the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Ms. Roberts. Presentation by Maintenance Superintendents' Association (MSA) Mr. Greg Caine briefly reviewed the makeup of this association and the purpose for its formation and advised that each year the Inland Empire Desert Chapter of MSA selects one manager to receive the prestigious Manager of the Year Award. At this time, Mr. Caine announced this year's award recipient and congratulated Maintenance Superintendent Buron. Student of the Year Certificates Commending these students on their achievement, Mayor Roberts announced the names of the Students of the Year and Certificates of Achievement were presented to those students in attendance. Certificate of Appreciation to Sally Myers Mayor Roberts expressed appreciation to Ms. Myers and presented to her a Certificate of Appreciation for her dedication to the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Student of the Month and Student of the Year program. Certificate of Appreciation to Eve Craig Thanking Ms. Craig for efforts in organizing the prelude and intermission music for the City Council meetings, Mayor Roberts presented to her a Certificate of Appreciation. Certificate of Achievement Award to Tyson Wells for Eagle Scout Commending Tyson Wells on achieving the highest honor in Scout, Mayor Roberts presented to Mr. Wells a Certificate of Achievement. Minutes~062398 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 PUBLIC COMMI=NTS A. With regard to comments made by Chief Building Official Elmo at the June 1 6, 1998, City Council meeting, Ms. Jeanne Kearns, Gently Used Furniture, 27250 Madison Avenue, further addressed the issue of recent Code enforcement efforts against her business; disputed the fact of storing merchandise outside; and by way of pictures, further elaborated on other Code violations throughout the City which are in need of enforcement. In response to Councilman Stone, Ms. Kearns clarified a picture dated May 23, 1998, advising that she was informed that she is no longer permitted to store merchandise in the abbreviated parking space but that the merchandise stored along the front of the store is within Code. For Councilman Stone, Chief Building Official Elmo briefly reviewed enforcement actions taken against other businesses in the City, ensuring Ms. Kearns that selective enforcement was not an issue; advised that because of limited staff and considering the workload, Code enforcement operates on a reactive basis, which achieves spot checks throughout the City on a complaint basis and eliminates the appearance of selective enforcement. B. By way of pictures, Mr. Lou Kashmere, 29115 Front Street, requested the City's assistance in controlling the sand and gravel debris generated from the cement plant. Mrs. Sharon Kashmere, 2911 5 Front Street, echoed Mr. Kashmere's concerns. Noting that this has been an on-going problem, Mayor Pro Tem Ford requested that staff immediately address this matter. Concurring with Mayor Pro Tern Ford's comment, Councilman Stone noted that the business responsible for the debris should be held accountable. City Manager Bradley advised that the business owner would be immediately contacted. C. Referencing written communication previously submitted to the City Council, Mr. Harold Meyers and Gary Scheurell, 30930 Corte Arroyo Vista, informed the Councilmembers of their recent purchase of a lot near the DMV; advised that escrow should be closing July 6, 1998; and noted that last week, they were informed to sign an Agreement to waive rights to vote on an Assessment District for the Western Bypass. Relaying their objection to signing such an Agreement, Mr. Meyers and Mr. Scheurell requested the Council's consideration. CITY COUNCIL RFPORTS A. Having attended a meeting at which the proposed repeal of the State Vehicle License Tax was discussed, Councilman Comerchero advised that Senator Haynes had clarified that his proposal does include a 100% backfill out of the State General Fund. In the event of a possible Minutes~062398 3 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 recession, Mr. Comerchero expressed his concern with the vulnerability of this backfill and, therefore, at this point in time, relayed his opposition to the repeal of the Vehicle License Fee (VLF). B. Councilman Comerchero reminded the residents that Monday, July 1 3, 1 998, will be the first Councilman's Night In (scheduled for every second Monday of the month), noting that appointments may be made through the City Manager's Office. C. Because of other City commitments, Councilman Stone advised of his inability to participate in the Councilman's Night In program but offered to the residents his willingness to meet on an alternative night. D. Because of speeding and cut-through traffic concerns near Del Rey Road, which were relayed to him by Meadowview residents, Councilman Stone advised that he had spoken to Police Chief Labahn and requested that the speed monitor be placed in the area and that radar officers further monitor the area. E. Further addressing the repeal of the Vehicle License Fee, Mayor Roberts advised that Assemblyman Thompson expressed his opposition to the repeal until some form of assurance can be given with regard to State backfill. Mayor Roberts noted that the League of California Cities as well opposes the repeal. With regard to the VLF repeal, City Manager Bradley advised that Governor Wilson's office has been apprised of the City's opposition as well as its desire for constitutional protection. F. Mayor Roberts requested that the Traffic and Public Safety Commission review the possibility of utilizing a sign entitled "No parking entire block." Mr. Roberts noted that such a sign would be visually less intrusive on the City than the painting of red curbs. CONS!=NT CAL!=NDAR 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 26, 1998. Minutes\062398 4 Temecula C~ Council June 23. 1996 o o Resolution Approving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 98-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety 4.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute an Agreement with JAS Pacific, Inc. for Building Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 1998-1999 for an amount of thirty thousand dollars {$30,000.00). A~;)peal of 1997-98 Temecula Parks/Street Lighting Tax.' Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course - Request for Continuance 5.1 Approve the request for continuance off-calendar concerning the appeal of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course. Resolution Adopting FY1998/99 Solid Waste Rates 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 Acceptance of Grants of Easements for Tuscany Ridge Apartments (Margarita Road easterly of Moraga Road) 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN GRANTS OF EASEMENTS FOR STREET RIGHT OF WAY, BUS TURN OUT, AND STORM DRAIN PURPOSES FOR TUSCANY RIDGE APARTMENTS PROJECT PA97- 0089 BUT NOT ACCEPTING THESE EASEMENTS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME PA97-0089 Minutes\062398 5 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates for Construction Contract Administration for the Old Town Streetscape Project ~ Project No. PW97-05 8.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates for Construction Contract Administration and Inspection Services for the Old Town Streetscape Project- Project No. PW97-05 - in the amount of $206,395.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $20,639.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this issue. Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement for Old Town Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05 9.1 Approve a Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement with C. H. J., Incorporated in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for geotechnical investigation of the storm drain and street pavement structural sections for the Old Town Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05 - and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $3,000.00 which is 10% of the contract amount. Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this issue. 10. Solicitation of Construction Bids and Agproval of the Plans and Specifications for the Winchester Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW97-19 10.2 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Winchester Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW97-19. 11. Amendment to Contract with David Turch and Associates 11.1 Approve an amendment to the contract with David Turch and Associates which extends the contract period to June 30, 1999 and increases the annual contract amount to $28,000. 12. Acquisition of Real Property at Northwest Corner of Highway 79 South and La Paz Road (Moramarco) for Highway Widening and Park and Ride Facility 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes\062398 6 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 RESOLUTION NO. 98-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND LA PAZ ROAD MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 7 and 10 - 12. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 8 and 9. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the excel;)tion of Councilman Stone who abstained. At 8:02 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecule Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Winchester Hills Financing Authority. At 8:33 P.M., after a short recess, the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business. COUNCIL BUSINI=SS 13. Planning Application No. PA95-0130 (Develol;)ment Agreement Amendment) 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0130 13.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENTITLED SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1, WITH WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Minutes\062398 7 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 13.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED PARKLAND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, FOR THE MURRIETA CREEK PILOT PARK By way of overheads, Community Development Director Thornhill, in detail, reviewed the staff report (of record), noting, as per the City Attorney, that the concern raised by Rancho California Water District would be a civil matter between the District and the owner and advising that the two one-acre parcels are located along an earthquake fault line. Ms. Jeannie Gillen, 30195 Del Rey Road, Citizens Coalition for the Murrieta Creek Pilot Project, noted that the proposed development of this five-acre pilot park would not be representative of the level of development for the entire 1 1-mile Creek distance, clarifying that this pilot project would reflect would could be accomplished. Addressing the issue of security, City Attorney Thorson noted that the City Council may choose any type of security, noting that bonds are traditionally chosen; that problems arise with the enforcement of bonds but that more problems arise with the enforcement of a Deed of Trust on a property; that a letter of credit or certificate of deposit has been previously used as security without any problems; that bonding is for the alternative in the event the pilot park were not built within two years; and that, at which time, the obligation would be to complete the landscape and irrigation plans at a minimum, noting that bonding is for the minimum. Councilman Lindemans suggested that the two one-acre parcels be released to Mr. Dendy so that he may proceed with development plans and that the remaining five acres (pilot park) be discussed at a future meeting. Commenting on the developer's willingness to build the pilot park, Mayor Pro Tern Ford noted that this particular area of discussion will serve as an entry way for the west side of the City. Mr. Ford encouraged the City Council to approve a security amount and stated that if the developer were not to complete the park within two years, he would then be responsible for its maintenance. Acting Community Services Director Parker noted that the City's annual cost for on-going maintenance for the five-acre pilot park would be approximately $34,000. Mr. Bill Dendy, Westside Business Centre, advised that the five-acre pilot park area was originally designated to be a minimum linear park for erosion-control purposes. He requested that the City Council release the two one-acre parcels (Lots 1 2 and 95); advised that he would be willing to issue a bond to build a linear park on the five-acre parcel; requested that he be given the opportunity to receive three landscaping bids; and noted that this five-acre area would Minutes\062398 8 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 be donated to the property owners' association; at which time, all maintenance would be managed through the association, relieving the City of any obligation to maintain. Although voicing no objection to releasing the two one-acre parcels to Mr. Dendy, Councilman Comerchero relayed his reservation with the five-acre pilot park project for the following reasons: unaware of future plans for the remaining five miles of Creek located within the City; project should follow the City's process as other projects; project is not financially supported by the Special Tax; and unaware of full financial exposure. In closing, Mr. Comerchero voiced no opposition to refund fees incurred with regard to the pilot project at the time the property is deeded to the City. Councilman Stone also noted no objection to releasing the two one-acre parcels and to Mr. Dendy developing the park to base standards or working with the Coalition to discuss enhancements. In light of the Council's discussion, City Attorney Thorson advised that the following amendments would have to be made to the Development Agreement: that release of the two linear parks in the interior of the project would be granted; that Mr. Dendy build the pilot park project or develop the land in compliance with the existing landscaping standards of the two one-acre parcels; that the City would have the ability to accept the park; that technical changes were necessary to the Consent to the legal description. After additional discussion with regard to security of the pilot park project, it was the consensus of the Council that the developer obtain three bids from reputable landscapers, with the City approving the three chosen firms, and that the bond be based on the lowest bid. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue Agenda Item No. 13 to the July 14, 1998, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Agenda Item No. 15 discussed out of order. COUNCIL BUSINI=SS 15. Murrieta Creek Pilot Project, Diaz Road at Winchester Road - Plan Check and Map Fees 15.1 Approve waiver of Plan Check and Inspection Fees for development of the Murrieta Creek Pilot Park Project. Speaking in support of the Creek pilot park project, Ms. Jeannie Gillen, 30195 Del Rey Road, referenced her letter (of record); thanked the City Council and City staff for their support, assistance, and cooperation with this project; advised that this pilot park project has been Minutes\062398 9 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 reviewed and approved according to the standards of the City; and requested that the City, in its gesture of support, consider waiving the planning and inspection fees totaling approximately $9,000. In light of the Council's action with regard to Agenda Item No. 13 (Development Agreement Amendment), Councilman Lindemans offered the following motion: MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to continue Agenda Item No. 1 5 to the July 14, 1 998, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Councilman Comerchero reiterated his concern with the City not knowing the future plans of the remaining five miles of Creek within the City and its associated costs. Councilman Stone relayed his support of the community interest to develop this property. At this time, Council returned to Agenda Item No. 14 PUBLIC HFARINGS 14. Annual Adjustment of Develol;)ment Iml;)act Fees 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99, TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESOLUTIONS 97-94 AND 98-30 Senior Management Analyst Kuhns provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material). Mayor Pro Tern Ford requested that clarification be provided with regard to the industrial vacancy rate for 1994-95, 1995-96, 1 996-97. Councilman Lindemans relayed no objection to the proposed 10% increase in non-residential development impact fees as long as the City can ensure that there is a healthy growth within the City. Minutes\062398 10 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 In light of the vacancy rate discrepancy between Dr. Husing's 7% figure and Mr. Dendy's 111/2% figure, it was the consensus to continue this Agenda Item to a future City Council meeting and to invite Dr. Husing to that meeting in order to address this discrepancy as well as other questions. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue Agenda Item No. 14 to a future meeting and to invite Dr. Husing to this meeting in order to address Council questions. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COUNCIL BUSINESS - continued 16. Review and Adoption of FY 1998-99 Annual Operating Budget 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FY1998-99 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS 16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS City Manager Bradley reviewed the staff report, highlighting the City's continued efforts to concentrate on public safety costs. Mayor Roberts requested that one of the two Building and Safety vehicles to be purchased be a 1998 Ford Ranger EV which is an electric model. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution Nos. 98-55 and 98-56 as amended, reflecting Mayor Roberts' request for one 1998 Ford Ranger EV. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Because the Community Service Funds program has been increased, Councilman Comerchero requested the Councilmen's support, at a future date, to consider the support of creating two community service scholarships ($1,000 each) to be awarded to those students who have demonstrated community service beyond all others. Minutes\062398 11 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to extend the Council meeting to 10:15 P.M. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 1 7. Adoption of the FY1 999-03 Capital Improvement Program 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY1999-03 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY1998-99 City Manager Bradley reviewed the staff report (of record), briefly commenting on the nine major circulation projects which are to be expected to be completed by December 31, 1 999. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-57. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who abstained with regard to Old Town Improvements within the Capital Improvement Program. 18. Traffic Signal Update 18.1 Oral Report presented by Public Works Director Kicak. Providing a brief update, Public Works Director Kicak advised that the signal should be operational by the week of July 13, 1998. CITY MANAGFR'S RFPORT No comments. CITY ATTORNFY'S RIFPORT City Attorney Thorson made the following comments with regard to Closed Session Items: Item No. 1 approved; Item No. 2 will be reviewed by the City Council in open session at the July 14, 1998, City Council meeting; Item No. 3 City Council direction was provided; Minutes\062398 12 Temecula City Council June 23. 1998 Item No. 4 City Council direction was provided. City Attorney Thorson recommended that the Flood Plane Management Ordinance be discussed at an upcoming meeting to ensure its compliance with certain CEQA regulations. Mayor Roberts reminded and invited everyone to attend the upcoming Fourth of July festivities. ADJOURNMENT At 10:06 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, July 14, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Minutes\062398 13 ITEM 3 RESOLSON NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,541,052.14. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Re,os 98- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of July, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOF_S: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Resos 98- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/09/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/16/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/28/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/09/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07/28/98 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 120 165 190 191 192 193 194 210 280 300 320 330 34O GENERAL FUND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES PAYROLL: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 280 3O0 320 330 340 GENERAL RDA-LOW/MOD TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-ClP INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: GENIE ROB~ TS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 657,863.59 1,112,064.37 606,000.46 165,123.72 $ 2,541,052.14 750,585.26 34,761.00 513,207.19 89,542.73 22,830.37 46,328.05 26,047.84 698.36 676,025.03 159,468.79 37,902.67 6,789.92 11,140.15 $ 2,375,928.42 113,569.82 2,351.42 35,657.17 69.73 180.09 2,272.27 984.11 2,744.82 274.17 2,683.33 800.78 3,536.01 165,123.72 2,541,052.14 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 09:13 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER!00S PAGE 12 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 165 RDA DEV- LC~/MO0 SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORNATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES AMOUNT 237,550.19 34,761.00 202,948.26 18,150.49 18.87 39.97 12,843.40 283.99 121,315.83 11,212.77 370.05 10,037.85 208.75 8,122.17 TOTAL 657,863.59 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/10/98 09:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50274 07/07/98 002908 BRUNSWICK CAL OAKS 80~L 97/98 YEAR END ACTIVITY 001-140-999-5248 47.40 47.40 980907 07/09/98 000166 50277 07/09/98 003263 50277 07/09/98 003263 50278 07/09/98 000724 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL MATE 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL MATE A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI PURCHASE:28699 FRONT ST PROP. STRIPING TAPE FOR PUBLIC WORKS SALES TAX DAY CAMP T-SHIRTS 165-199-812-5804 001-164-602-5410 001-164-602-5410 190-183-999-5340 201,092.10 945.00 7~.24 921.26 201,092.10 1,018.24 921.26 50279 07/09/98 001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F WEED ABATEMENT 001-164-601-5402 870.00 870.00 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 · 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 50280 07/09/98 000116 50281 07/09/98 50282 07/09/98 50283 07/09/98 000936 50284 07/09/98 003279 50285 07/09/98 000101 50286 07/09/98 001323 50286 07/09/98 001323 50286 07/09/98 001323 50287 07/09/98 0028~8 50287 07/09/98 0028/+8 50287 07/09/98 0028~8 '50288 07/09/98 003126 50289 07/09/98 50290 07/09/98 003138 50291 07/09/98 003214 50291 07/09/98 003214 50292 07/09/98 000413 50293 07/09/98 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP A V P VISION PLANS COBRA/VISION/NELSON AL & KATHY GALLO INTERN ALCORN, JOE & NANCY AMERICAN RED CROSS ANZA PACIFIC APPRAISALS APPLE ONE, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BADGER, THE BADGER, THE BADGER, THE BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS BROOKSTONE CONSTRUCTION CAL Fd~T REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT RED CROSS AQUATICS SUPPLIES APPRAISAL OF NORM REEVES PROP. TEMP HELP W/E 6/20 WILLIAMS DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL DRINKING WATER.FOR CITY HALL DRINKING WATER FOR CRC PERS. SMOKE DETECTOR BADGES PERSONALIZED PLATE FREIGHT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-2310 165-2310 190-2310 193-Z310 280-2310 300-2310 340-2310 001-1180 190-2900 120-2680 190-183-999-5310 280-199-999-5250 280-199-999-5362 340-199-701-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-182-999-5250 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 190-183-999-5330 120-2680 001-164-601-5218 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218 CAL MAT SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH PERMIT O.T.STREETSCAPE PW97-05 REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT CALIFORNIA FAMILY LIFE 280-199-824-5801 190-2900 623.97 12.90 55.92 1.72 12.63 4.30 21.50 17.20 100.00 4,059.00 190.00 1,000.00 354.11 184.91 73.04 35.02 111.00 45.00 6.00 134.40 6,354.00 137.65 192.07 14.89 132.00 100.00 750.14 100.00 4,059.00 190.00 1,000.00 354.11 292.97 162.00 134.40 6,354.00 137.65 206.96 132.00 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/10/98 09:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT .50294 07/09/98 000486 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BU MEMBERSH%P DUES 98/99 Z.SMITH 001-140-999-5226 50294 07/09/98 000486 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BU B.L. CF:10/28-30 Z. SMITH 001-140-999-5261 50.00 150.00 200.00 50295 07/09/98 CANNON, PAMELA REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 50296 07/09/98 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG. EFFECTI REGIONAL MGMT TRAINING:LABAHN 001-170-999-5261 50296 07/09/98 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG. EFFECTI REGIONAL MGMT TRAINING:ROBERTS 001-140-999-5261 1,750.00 1,750.00 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S 001-2330 22.00 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 56.00 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIOEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 66.50 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACGIOEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 47.75 50297 07/09/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIOEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 107.02 50298 07/09/98 001193 CONP USA, INC. COMPUTER HARDWARE & SUPPLIES 320-1970 50298 07/09/98 001193 CONP USA, INC. FREIGHT 320-1970 50298 07/09/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. SALES TAX 320-1970 50298 07/09/98 001193 CONP USA, INC. COMPUTER HARDWARE & SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 50298 07/09/98 001193 CONP USA, INC. SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 50298 07/09/98 001193 CONP USA, INC. SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 50299 07/09/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COt4PLAINTS ENTERTAINMENT SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 50300 07/09/98 003179 CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION PROG PMT:COSMIC DR/AGENA ST 210-165-677-5804 · 50300 07/09/98 003179 CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION RETENTION W/H PMT:COSMIC/AGENA 210-2035 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS 50301 07/09/98 000518 50302 07/09/98 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK 50303 07/09/98 DOUBLE O PIPELINE 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50304 07/09/98 001380 50305 07/09/98 002917 50306 07/09/98 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EDWARDS CINEMAS ESTHETIGUES SALON EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE POLICE K-9 MEDICAL TREATMENT JUN SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT TEMP HELP P/E 6/05 WILLIAMS TEMP HELP P/E 6/05 WILLIAMS TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 WILLIAMS TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 WILLIAMS TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 YONKER TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 DIAZ TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 CABRAL TEMP HELP P/E 6/19 MCLEAN (40)GROUP ACTIVITY TICKETS REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT LDSC MAINTENANCE:NICOLAS PARK LANDSCAPE MAINT:NICOLAS PARK TREE REMVL-REPLANT:MARTINIOUE REPLANT SHRUBS:MARTINIGUE REPLANT GRND COVER:MARTINIGUE 001-170-999-5327 300-2180 120-2680 001-161-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 001-150-999-5265 120-2680 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 50307 07/09/98 001056 50307 07/09/98 001056 50307 07/09/98 001056 50307 07/09/98 001056 '50307 07/09/98 001056 3,968.09 20.00 307.53 1,076.40 37.31 46.11 150.00 5,040.00 504.00- 122.75 277.71 727.00 544.50 544.50 537.24 537.24 1,151.33 2,215.10 977.43 823.36 170.00 4,042.00 8~0.00 435.00 135.00 510.00 150.00 3,500.00 339.02 5,455.44 150.00 4,536.00 122.75 277.71 727.00 7,330.70 170.00 4,042.00 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 09:13 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM ANOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 · 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50307 07/09/98 50308 07/09/98 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 003268 EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FACE PAINTING AND MORE TREE REMVL-REPLANT:MARTINIQUE REPLANT SHRUBS:RANCHO SOLANA REPLANT SHRUBS:RANCHO SOLANA TREE REMOVAL-REPLANT:RIVERTON REPLANT SHRUBS:RIVERTON REMOVE DEAD PINE TREE:RIVERTON TREE REPLACEMENT:ROTARY PARK LDSC IMPROV. SIGNET SERIES LDSC IMPROV. CORTE CANTERA LDSC IMPROV. SOLANA MAY LDSC IMPROV. SOLANA WAY LDSC MA[HTENANCE:BUTTERFIELD REPLANT TREES:BUTTERFIELD REPLANT GRND COVER:BUTTERFIELD LDSC IMPROV. WOODCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. ~ODCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. WOODCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. WOOOCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. W(X)DCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. ~d(X~OCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. WOODCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. I~/00DCREST/RYECRES LDSC IMPROV. WOODCREST/RYECRES REPLANT GROUND COVER:MIRADA REPLANT TREES:MIRADA JULY 4TH ENTERTAINMENT-PUJOL 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 001-110-999-5223 300.00 300.00 120.00 180.00 750.00 75.00 75.00 450.00 100.00 110.00 200.00 270.00 150.00 45.00 500.00 705.00 120.00 390.00 1,065.00 495.00 450.00 90.00 30.00 216.00 300.01 239.00 9,556.01 239.00 50309 07/09/98 50309 07/09/98 50309 07/09/98 50310 07/09/98 50310 07/09/98 50310 07/09/98 50310 0?/09/98 50310 07/09/98 '50310 07/09/98 50311 07/09/98 50311 07/09/98 000478 000478 000478 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000166 000166 FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LETTERING FOR CITY FLOAT INSTALL - NON TAXABLE SALES TAX EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-120-999-527T 001-162-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-26~1 210-190-143-5802 210-190-143-5802 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 178.44 50.00 13.83 15.75 22.50 25.50 35.25 42.25 137.75 500.00 500.00 716.98 11.25 134.30 .45 1.35 14.65 8.10 16.52 2.25 242.27 279.00 1,000.00 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 09:13 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORT%S BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTO 280-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS %NS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 165-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS %NS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 280-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 '50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 320-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 330-2500 50312 07/09/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 340-2500 18.00 9.00 21.15 1,317.62 27.88 229.38 .90 2.22 27.07 13.01 34.19 3.50 44.71 8.91 32.01 1,471.14 29.95 246.42 .97 2.40 29.08 13.96 36.74 3.76 48.03 9.57 34.39 4,621.81 50314 07/09/98 FRANKLIN, OLIVIA 50314 07/09/98 FRANKLIN, OLIVIA REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOH RENTAL 190-2900 REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOt4 RENTAL 190-183-4990 100.00 20.00 120.00 50315 07/09/98 002883 FRY'S ELECTRONICS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 215.49 215.49 50316 07/09/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-506-2626 dUN SUB STATION 001-170-999-5229 50316 07/09/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-8927 dUN GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 50317 07/09/98 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, I~C. MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 301.18 28.67 320.06 329.85 320.06 50318 07/09/98 GEARHEART, PAM REFUND:BASKETBALL FUNDAMENTALS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 50319 07/09/98 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214 140.00 140.00 50320 07/09/98 002528 GLASS BLASTERS MEN HIRE MUGS 001-150-999-5265 15.09 15.09 50321 07/09/98 GLENHA, SURAYA REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 50322 07/09/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 50322 07/09/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 001-150-999-5250 001-150-999-5220 450.00 46.97 496.97 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (6)HP INKJET CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 143.94 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (4)HP INKJET CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 115.96 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/10/98 09:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER%00S PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE HP INK CARTRIDGE FOR PRINTER 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE PO~ER STRIP OUTLETS 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE COMPUTER SOFTHARE & SUPPLIES 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL CUMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (4)HP INKJET CARTRIDGES 50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT '50323 07/09/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 11.13 20.72 115.80 159.80 24.89 21.99 95.88 5.70 .98 6.54 1.12 115.96 6.31 9.22 855.94 50324 07/09/98 GORHAM CO., INC REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT 120-2680 752.00 752.00 50325 07/09/98 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM REPAIR POLICE STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5215 125.00 125.00 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HARDHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - FIRE 001-171-999-5242 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HAROHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCSO 190-183-999-5380 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HARDHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL ~0-199-701-5212 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HARDHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SKATE PRK 190-183-999-5305 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HARDHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HAROHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HAROHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HARDHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 50326 07/09/98 000186 HANKS HAROHARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 126.63 137.87 32.25 149.91 222.08 125.82 500.00 444.92 27.50 50327 07/09/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CUMP 001-2080 1,815.68 50327 07/09/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.75 50327 07/09/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 294.74 50327 07/09/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 34.66 50328 07/09/98 003295 INSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIO COMM SKILLS SEM:8/18 R. HRUSKA 001-110-999-5261 ~.00 1,766.98 7~.00 50329 07/09/98 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 50330 07/09/98 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 50331 07/09/98 003296 INTERNATIONAL FIRE COOE UFC CERT.TRAINING 8/3-7 F.OEPT 001-171-999-5261 50332 07/09/98 001186 IRHIN, dOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 50333 07/09/98 003239 J & M CONSTRUCTION OLD TOUN MURAL PAINTING 280-199-813-5804 50334 07/09/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN JUNE INSPECTION SERVICES 001-162-999-5250 50335 07/09/98 JETER, JOE & RUSSELL D. REFUND:PUBL%C FACILITY OEPOSIT 120-2680 50336 07/09/98 KALFUS, ARTHUR REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 280.74 301.87 1,570.00 72.00 4,500.00 4,219.50 4,207.00 100.00 280.74 301.87 1,570.00 72.00 4,500.00 4,219.50 4,207.00 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 50336 '50337 50337 50338 50339 50339 50340 50341 50341 50341 50341 50342 50343 50344 50345 50345 50345 50345 '50345 50345 50345 50345 5O346 50347 50348 50349 50350 50351 50352 50352 50353 50354 50354 09:13 CHECK DATE 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 VENDOR NUMBER 002789 002789 003262 003262 000209 000945 000945 000945 000~5 000213 002890 003076 003076 003076 003076 003076 003076 003076 003076 003241 001384 000437 001214 002995 002995 003259 003259 VENDOR NAME KALFUS, ARTHUR KINCO STAFFING SOLUTION KINCO STAFFING SOLUTION KINDERCARE LEARNING CEN KOALA CORPORATION KOALA CORPORATION L & M FERTILIZER, INC. L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L P S COMPUTER SERVICE L P S COMPUTER SERVICE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TE LOS RANCHITOS HOA MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE CCMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I MINUTEMAN PRESS MI SKAM, CHRISTINA MORELAND & ASSOCIATES MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO MURRIETA KNIGHTS OF COL MYRON MANUFACTURING COR MYRON MANUFACTURING COR McCUSKER, JOHN & CHRIST NIGHT SUN NIGHT SUN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER ADD'TL R0014 RENTAL HOURS 190-183-4990 TENP HELP W/E 6/21MACALUSO TENP HELP W/E 6/28 CHENG 001-140-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 REFUND:PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSIT 120-2680 CRC-BABY CHANGING STATION FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 HP III REFURB TONER CART 95A HP Illsi REFURB TONER CART 91A HP 5P REFURB TONER CART 3903A SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 PUB:WALKABLE COMM WRKSHP VIDEO 001-161-999-5261 909-223-1667/317-6491 dUN d.O. 001-170-99~-5208 REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 003076 DENTALNL 190-2340 003076 DENTALNL 193-2340 003076 DENTALNL 280-2340 003076 OENTALML 300-2340 003076 DENTALML 340-23~0 JULY/DENTAL/NELSON/FLAMMER 001-1180 BLON OUT DRAIN LINESaCITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 FOIL BUSINESS CARDS: H.PARKER 190-180-999-5222 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 97-98 AUDIT SERVICES (CITY) 001-140-999-5248 SOUND EQUIPMENT FOR THE CRC 190-182-999-5301 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 PROMOTIONAL PENS SHIPPING & HANDLING & SET UP 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 REFD:PUBLIC FACILITIES DEPOSIT 120-2680 BIKE SUPPLIES FOR POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5242 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5242 ITEM AMOUNT 15.00- 67.60 78.00 3,114.00 399.90 30.00 166.59 396.00 69. O0 198.00 51.38 30.69 192.60 100.00 2,607.01 97.80 270.99 20.24 81.43 19.56 78.23 106.50 1,326.36 110.44 100.00 3,720.75 400.00 100.00 210.00 16.82 4,298. O0 198.00 22.18 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 85.00 145.60 3,114.00 429.90 166.59 714.38 30.69 192.60 100.00 3,281.76 1,326.36 110.44 100.00 3,720.75 400.00 100.00 226.82 4,298.00 220.18 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 09:13 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50355 07/09/98 O~NEAL, LINDA REFUND: DAY CAMP 190-18~-4984 10.00 10.00 50356 07/09/98 50356 07/09/98 50356 07/09/98 003294 003294 003294 OLD TO~N GUNFIGHTERS AS OLD TOWN GUNFIGHTERS AS OLD TOWN GUNFIGHTERS AS PMT: RETURNED CK 112 6/24/96 PMT: RETURNED CK 112 6/24/96 OLD TWN MAINSTREET inv9/24/97 190-183-4992 001-199-4061 280-199-999-5362 20.00- 15.00- 250.00 215.00 50357 07/09/98 50357 07/09/98 50357 07/09/98 002105 002105 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 001-164-601-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-164-604-5214 73.45 93.44 72.23 239.12 50358 07/09/98 50359 07/09/98 50360 07/09/98 50361 07/09/98 003253 003292 PACIFIC COI'94ERCIAL PACIFIC TECHNICAL SERVI PATTISON, WILLIAM B. PEER, CARMEN REFD:PUBLIC FACILITIES DEPOSIT BUTTERFIELD PARK IRRIG. REPAIR REIMB:GFOA CF:6/27-7/1/98 REFUND: TENNIS 120-2680 193-180-999-5212 001-140-999-5258 190-183-4982 4,362.00 37.50 134.36 25.00 4,362.00 37.50 134.36 25.00 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 .50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 5O362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 50362 07/09/98 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH 1NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR: PRE 000245 AETNA SO AETNA SO AETNA SO BLSHIELD BLSHIELD BLSHIELD CIGNA CIGNA HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHHET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PC PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS DED PERS-ADM AETNA SO AETNA SO BLSHIELD BLSHIELD HELTHNET 001-2090 165-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 300-2090 001-2090 190-2090 191-2090 192-2090 193-2090 194-2090 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 194-2090 001-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 484.77 214.33 71.43 1,126.15 361.45 1.14 844.50 39.46 5,575.15 1,057.95 15.53 31.05 307.05 46.57 1.99 155.25 793.97 1,707.53 148.8~ 3,768.26 676.35 19.10 104.45 16.00 2,468.08 257.78 981.37 103.46 102.28 34.10 5.47 54.07 371.50 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 09:13 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NIJMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT .50362 50362 50362 50362 50362 50362 50362 50362 50363 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 001958 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 HELTHHET HELTHNET KAISERSO PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PERS CHO PERS REV PERS L-T 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2122 40.88 15.35 20.90 162.56 35.80 1.88 160.14 1,004.93- 50.77 21,378.95 50.77 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ '5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 5036~ 50366 50367 50367 50368 50369 50370 50370 50371 50371 50372 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 00O249 002110 000947 000947 000262 000411 000271 000271 000277 000277 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PRIME EQUIPMENT RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER RIVERSIDE CO.-FLOO0 CON ROBERT BEIN, gM FROST & ROBERT BEIN, ta4 FROST & S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, SAATZER, DANIEL PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR P.W. DEPT BLUEPRINT REPRO:OT STREETSCAPE BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 02-79-10100-1N.W. SPORTS PLAN CK:MARG WlDEN/OVRLD CONST MAY PROF SVCS:WINCH. RD MEDIAN MAY ENG SVS:SANTA GERTRUDIS TR RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC ACTIVITY SUPPLIES FOR TCSD REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 330-199-999-5217 001-120-999-5222 001-162-999-5222 001-140-999-5118 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5260 001-140-999-5262 001-150-999-5260 001-161-999-5260 001-16~-601-5250 001-170-999-5222 001-171-999-5220 190-2920 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5260 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5370 190-182-999-5301 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5370 190-18~-999-5301 340-199-701-5263 001-16~-601-5238 280-199-824-5804 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5240 210-165-681-5801 210-165-686-5802 210-190-147-5802 190-18~-999-5301 190-183-999-5340 190-2900 26.02 21.12 12.66 20.00 2.91 100.52 42.90 9.24 66.51 15.00 4.10 45.24 15.99 31.98 5.12 17.50 4.08 13.88 14.00 5.59 4.06 8.54 10.34 528.83 78.58 9.40 108.78 3,920.63 2,886.93 1,544.00 16.15 110.25 100.00 497.30 528.83 87.98 108.78 3,920.63 4,430.93 126.40 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/10/98 09:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NLJHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUHBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 5037'5 07/09/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 97.80 97.80 50374 07/09/98 002384 SECURE BUSINESS COMMUNI AUDIO/VIDEO MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5250 1,200.00 1,200.00 50375 07/09/98 SHAW, EARL REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 50376 07/09/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-747-1393 MONROE PED 340-199-701-5240 50376 07/09/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 50376 07/09/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 193-180-999-5240 50376 07/09/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-502-8077 CITY HALL 340-199-702-5240 26.62 4,469.85 709.08 597.36 5,802.91 50377 07/09/98 000295 STEAM MASTERS CARPET CLEANING a STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 · 50377 07/09/98 000295 STEAM MASTERS CLEAN RECLINERS ~ STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 240.00 240.00 480. O0 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNDISTAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNDISTAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNDISTAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNDISTAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNDISTAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYND1STAR 50378 07/09/98 002224 SYNOISTAR INC DON~T PLAY W/MATCHES COLOR BK 001-171-999-5296 INC DETECTOR PROTECTOR ACTIVITY 001-171-999-5296 INC FUN W/SMOKEY ACTIVITY SHEET 001-171-999-5296 INC SAFETY ALWAYS MATTERS BOOKMARK 001-171-999-5296 INC SMOKEY MEMBERSHIP CARDS 001-171-999-5296 INC REDDOG MEMBERSHIP CARDS 001-171-999-5296 INC FREIGHT 001-171-999-5296 130.00 27.00 27.00 45.00 48.00 27.50 61.00 365.50 50379 07/09/98 003293 TALCOTT COMPANY OLD TWN MAINSTREET inv11/24/97 280-199-999-5362 916.00 916.00 50380 07/09/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR COUNCIL MTGS 001-100-999-5220 19.33 50380 07/09/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR SPEC EVENTS 190-180-999-5301 34.72 54.05 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 548.91 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 1.02 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 14.35 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 3.08 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 4.59 50381 07/09/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN OUES 320-2125 20.50 676.50 50382 07/09/98 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES MOTORCYCLE TRAILER FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5610 1,734.90 '50382 07/09/98 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES SALES TAX 001-170-999-5610 134.45 1,8t59.35 50383 07/09/98 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 103.34 103.36 50384 07/09/98 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER PER 5/26 AGREEMENT W/COUNCIL 001-111-999-5264 117,900.00 117,900.00 50385 07/09/98 000957 TENECULA VALLEY FILM CO 50386 07/09/98 000314 TENECULA VALLEY MUSEUM 50387 07/09/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE 50387 07/09/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE 50387 07/09/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE 50387 07/09/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE PER AGREEMNT W/COUNCIL 5/26/98 DRAW REQUEST MUSEUM/CHAPEL EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-111-999-5264 50,000.00 50,000.00 210-190-808-5804 107,428.27 107,428.27 001-1020 3,406.84 165-1020 271.29 190-1020 480.00 280-1020 183.71 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/10/98 09:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER '50387 07/09/98 0006~2 TEMECULAo CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 50387 07/09/98 0006/,2 TEMECULAw CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 50388 07/09/98 TENORIO, LUIS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 9.50 350.00 100.00 CHECK AMOUNT 4,701.34 100.00 50389 07/09/98 003092 TIMBERLAKE PAINTING PAINT FENCE ALONG SANTIAGO RD 193-180-999-5212 50390 07/09/98 002769 TODD~S FENCING RES.IMPROVE.PROG:S.SLAUGHTER 165-199-813-5804 50391 07/09/98 001483 TO!4 ODDSON & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING SVCS:WESTERN BYPASS 280-199-807-5802 4,900.00 1,018.02 102.75 4,900.00 1,018.02 102.75 50392 07/09/98 TOSTADO, EVA REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-&975 22.00 22.00 50393 07/09/98 002429 TONERS, PERRIN, FORSTER PUB: GOVtT RISK MGMT REPORTS 001-140-999-5228 90.00 90.00 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL AOVAN 001-2510 175.45 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 159.35 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 12.10 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.00 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. SALAZAR VOL LIFE 001-1170 9.10 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 175.45- 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 159.35 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 12.10 50394 07/09/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.00 360.00 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080 4,366.70 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 165-2080 22.7~ 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 190-2080 lw254.81 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 .75 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 24.92 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP 194-2080 90.83 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP 280-2080 139.58 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 10.01 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP 320-2080 666.66 50395 07/09/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF CUMP 340-2080 154.82 50396 07/09/98 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 611.76 50396 07/09/98 000~89 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 27.98 50396 07/09/98 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 1,432.04 50396 07/09/98 000~89 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 3.64 50396 07/09/98 000~89 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 56.66 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-110-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-120-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-162-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 190-180-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-170-999-52~0 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 280-199-999-5230 '50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-140-999-5230 50397 07/09/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-150-999-5230 18.24 105.87 511.50 67.85 38~.35 19.75 257.30 566.90 72.09 6,731.81 2,132.08 VOUCHRE2 07/10/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 50397 50397 50397 50397 50398 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50399 50400 50400 50400 50400 50400 50400 50400 50401 50402 50402 50402 50402 50402 50402 -50403 50403 50404 50405 50405 50406 50407 50408 50409 09:13 CHECK DATE 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 07/09/98 VENDOR NUMBER 002702 002702 002702 002702 002492 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000332 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 002109 002109 001997 002092 002092 002383 00018~ VENDOR NAME U S POSTAL SERVICE:CNRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S TOY COItPANY, INC. UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNION BANK OF CALIF UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED HAY VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WINDOWS MAGAZINE WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH YELLOU BASKET ZKS REAL ESTATE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ~F S G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR CRC N. 5415305001995902 JS/AT&T CHRGS N. 5415305001995902 JS/AT&T CHRGS N. 5415305001995894 RR/OALLAS TX N. 5415305001995894 RR/DALLAS TX N. 5415305001995894 RR/DALLAS TX N. 5415305001995886 SF/MARYLAND N. 5415305001995910 RB/UNOCAL N. 5415305002931146:sJ N. 5415305002931146:SJ N. 5415305001995977:JK N. 541530500199597'7:JK 000325 UW 0O0325 UW O0O325 UW O0O325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW PLAN CHECK SERVICES BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES: CITY HALL BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES:MAINT FAC BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES:SR CNTR BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES:MAINT FAC BLOG MAINT SUPPLIES:SR CTR MISC. PW MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. PW MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14 ISSUES OF WINDOWS MAGAZINE PR]NTING-CORP PERS RELOCATION SALES TAX RFD: PUBLIC FACILITIES DEPOSIT REFD:PUBLIC FACILITIES DEPOSIT DAY CAMP EXCURSION 7/16 909-699-8138 AUG O.T. MAINSTRT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 190-182-999-5301 001-100-999-5208 001-1990 001-1990 001-100-999-5260 001-1990 001-1990 001-110-999-5263 001-120-~-5260 001-1170 001-165-999-5260 001-16,4-604-5260 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 192-2120 193-2120 194-2120 340-2120 001-162-999-5248 340-199-701-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-182-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5228 280-199-999-5270 280-199-999-5270 120-2680 120-2680 190-183-999-5340 280-199-999-5362 ITEM AMOUNT 1,392.04 89.26 80. O0 2.74 170.95 7.26 18~.10 253.00 69.74 3.55 297.89 53.94 59.26 248.64 81.49 81.60 152.00 1.00 24.80 .15 .75 3.99 .31 579.53 80.30 96.35 532.38 303.45 8.40 74.46 7.61 25.69 19.97 1,161.00 89.98 124.00 2,722.00 668.50 458.06 PAGE 11 CHECK AMOUNT 3,567.89 170.95 1,339.47 183.00 579.53 1,095.34 33.30 19.97 1,250.98 124.00 2,722.00 668.50 458.06 TOTAL CHECKS 657,863.59 VOUCHRE2 07'/16/98 10:19 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOOS PAGE 10 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 CC~4MUNITY SERVZCES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL O 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 98,039.03 305,991.79 62,797'.82 22,811.50 46,288.08 4,550.98 415.37 405,168.75 143,988.88 230.91 12,183.01 6,580.27 3,017.98 TOTAL 1,112,064.37 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50410 50411 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/10/98 07/15/98 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 000128 003305 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES OLD TOWN TRAVEL JUN WORKERS COHP INSURANCE JUN UORKERS COMP INSURANCE JUN WORKERS COMP INSURANCE JUN WORKERS CUMP INSURANCE JUN Q/ORKERS CUMP INSURANCE JUN WORKERS COMP INSURANCE JUN I~ORKERS CUMP INSURANCE JUN WORKERS CONP INSURANCE JUN EK)RKERS CUMP INSURANCE JUN WORKERS CONP INSURANCE dUN WORKERS CONP INSURANCE dUN WORKERS COMP INSURANCE JUN S~ORKERS COMP INSURANCE dUN WORKERS CUMP INSURANCE dUN NORKERS COMP INSURANCE AIRFARE:LEAGUE CF:8/26-28:CONM 001-2370 165-2370 190-2370 191-2370 192-2370 193-2370 194-2370 280-2370 300-2370 320-23?0 330-2370 340-2370 001-140-999-5112 190-183-999-5112 190-1990 190-180-999-5258 3,204.46 84.60 1,258.54 .80 1.96 48.36 23.74 73.62 3.31 39.24 8.48 264.56 .62 8.77 1.94 724.00 5,023.00 724.00 50412 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 116732 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 189653 07/15/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 07/14/98 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 00044~ 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 00028~ 000283 000283 CLERK OF THE COURT INSTATAX (EDD) INSTAT/O((EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EOD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) ]NSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) [NSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EOO) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) 1NSTATAX (XRS) INSTATAX (IRS) DEPST:ELI LILLY EMINENT DOMAIN 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SOl 000444 SOl 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE OOOZd,4 STATE OOOZd~ STATE 0004/d~ STATE 000444 STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 210-1652 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 96,550.00 40.7'9 1.86 95.46 .24 3.78 4,458.35 113.36 821.93 1.59 69.38 24.29 108.49 9.53 130.89 23.45 126.71 17,153.37 270.09 4,300.01 8.96 23.16 343.45 137.51 327.73 28.07 574.18 111.57 556.02 4,250.03 96,550.00 6,033.96 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 189653 07/14/98 981507 07/15/98 50415 07/16/98 50416 07/16/98 50417 07/16/98 50418 07/16/98 50419 07/16/98 50419 07/16/98 50420 07/16/98 50421 07/16/98 50421 07/16/98 50422 07/16/98 50423 07/16/98 50424 07/16/98 50425 07/16/98 50425 07/16/98 50425 07/16/98 50425 07/16/98 50426 07/16/98 50427 07/16/98 50428 07/16/98 50429 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ INSTATAX ¢IRS) 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 002879 003304 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC. 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP AMARADIO, SHARLLA 001314 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. 003267 ANDREWS AUDIO VIDEO 003267 ANDREWS AUDIO VIDEO 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 002987 ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT S ARNETT, MARIA 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT, INC 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL 000586 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY 003255 BUSH, RAY 000588 C C A P A 003138 CAL MAT OO3138 CAL MAT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 00028~ MEDZCARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 00028~ MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE AGENCY CONTRIBUTION:TEN.GARDEN SECURITY DEP. BILLBOARD MUSEUM SITE LANDSCAPE DESIGN REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS GRADING WKSP:MF,PA,CD,LB 7/15 REPAIR OF TV-VCR FOR POLICE CREDIT:INVOICE PAID PREVIOUSLY TEMP HELP W/E 6/27 WILLIAMS MICROFILM STORAGE & SUPPLIES MISC MICRO-FILMING SUPPLIES RCSP DESILTING BASIN SCHEMATIC REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS REPAIR OF TCSD TRACTOR POSTAGE METER RENTAL POSTAGE METER RESETS POSTAGE METER RESETS SALES TAX CLEAN 30" CULVERT AT CABRILLO SUPPLEMENT SRVC-MUNICIPAL CODE BAND FOR SUM~ER CONCERT 7/19 CCAPA CF 9/16-18 PLANNING A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS NAINT ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 165-199-812-5804 280-199-999-5362 190-180-999-5248 190-183-4975 001-161-999-5261 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 280-199-999-5118 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-527T 190-180-999-5250 190-183-4975 190-180-999-5214 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5239 330-199-999-5239 001-164-601-5401 001-120-999-5250 190-183-999-5370 001-161-999-5258 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 82.19 1,247.11 2.40 6.19 80.28 36.60 96.75 9.46 114.92 27.54 129.76 305,000.00 3,400.00 750.00 27.00 315.00 220.50 70.00- 341.85 546.70 550.90 300.00 22.00 506.00 177.00 34.00 5.00 16.35 4,500.00 1,783.13 400.00 610.00 95.63 83.51 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 29,917.35 305,000.00 3,400.00 750.00 27.00 315.00 150.50 341.85 1,097.60 300.00 22.00 506.00 232.35 4,500.00 1,783.13 400.00 610.00 179.14 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK HUMBER 50431 50432 50433 50434 50435 50436 50437 50438 50439 50440 50441 50442 50442 50443 50444 50444 50444 50444 50445 50445 50445 50446 50446 50446 50446 50447 50447 50447 50447 50447 50448 50449 50449 10:19 CHECK DATE 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 VENDOR NUMBER 003306 001159 001655 000131 003272 002390 002712 002438 002438 002060 000478 000478 000478 000478 000165 000165 000165 003281 003281 003281 OO3281 001989 001989 001989 001989 001989 003249 000184 000184 VENDOR NAME CALIF. DEPT OF FORESTRY CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARTER, KELLY CLERK OF THE COURT DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP DI LEVA, GRACE DUGAN, ANNETTE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN ENGEN CORPORATION ENGEN CORPORATION EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTION FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTION FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTION FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTION FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FUELNAN OF CALIFORNIA G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO FIRE DETECTION SEN:7/20 EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT CARDS COMPRESSED HELIUM FOR BALLOONS OUTDOOR MED%A GROUP 06/03/97 REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS EMINENT DOMAIN:KCY OEV. PROP. GIS SUPPLIES FOR PLOTTER REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS JUL DIEGO DR WATER SERVICE ECOROMIC CONSULTING SERVICES NAY PROF SRVCS/WINCH.CRK PARK JUN PROF SRVCS-WINCH.CRK PARK REFRESHMENTS COUNCIL MEETING SIGNS FOR 4TH OF JULY PARADE SALES TAX BANNER FOR 4TH OF JULY PARADE SALES TAX EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES CUSTOM STOP/OROP/ROLL PENCILS FREIGHT CUSTOM DETECTOR LITTERBAGS FREIGHT COMPUTER CABLES ANO CONNECTORS SALES TAX KEYVIEW REMOTE NETWORK ACCESS FREIGHT SALES TAX FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 909-308-1079 JUN GENERAL USAGE 909-506-1941 JUL T.T.A. ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5261 001-150-999-5250 190-184-999-5301 300-199-999-5205 190-183-4975 210-1652 001-161-610-5220 190-183-4975 190-183-4975 193-180-999-5240 280-199-999-5248 210-190-149-5802 210-190-149-5802 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 190-18~-999-5370 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5362 001-162-999-5230 001-120-999-5277 280-199-999-5230 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 001-171-999-5296 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 001-161-999-5263 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 I TEN AMOUNT 525.00 168.00 10.10 130.00 27.00 11,200.00 598.85 54. O0 54.00 247.35 1,000. O0 1,385. O0 1,033.75 132.68 113.00 8.76 211.20 16.37 34.00 22.50 24.50 220. O0 16.60 210.00 17.90 3,368.00 261.02 2,970.75 14.50 230. ?.~ 12.99 59.35 57.87 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 525.00 168.00 10.10 130.00 27.00 11,200.00 598.85 54.00 54.00 247.35 1,000.00 2,418.75 132.68 349.33 81.00 464.50 6,84~.50 12.99 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/16/98 10:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50449 07/16/98 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-1409 JUN GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 145.68 50449 07/16/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-3539 JUN GENERAL USAGE 320-19~-9~9-5208 40.53 50449 07/16/98 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-0590 JUN T.T.T. ALARM 320-199-999-5208 59.93 50449 07/16/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-1370 JUN CABOOSE 001-110-999-5223 241.16 50449 07/16/98 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2811 JUL GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,503.14 50450 07/16/98 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, IHC. MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 320.06 2,107.66 320.06 50451 07/16/98 002160 GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES CRC WINDOW SHADE REPAIR/NAINT. 190-182-999-5212 1,004.75 1,004.75 50452 07/16/98 GREENBERG, LAUREN REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 27.00 27.00 50453 07/16/98 GUSTAFSON, JACKIE REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 27.00 27.00 50454 07/16/98 HORTON, VIRGINIA REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-18~-4975 30.00 50454 07/16/98 HORTON, VIRGINIA REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS 190-185-4975 27.00 57.00 50455 07/16/98 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST CUMPUTER MEMORY AND HARDWARE 001-161-610-560~ 1,125.00 50455 07/16/98 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST COMPUTER MEMORY AND HAROWARE 001-161-610-5604 1,187.00 50455 07/16/98 001429 INACUM INFORMATION SYST FREIGHT 001-161-610-560~ 5.95 50455 07/16/98 001429 INACON INFORMATION SYST SALES TAX 001-161-610-5604 179.65 50456 07/16/98 000501 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP:99 JONES:BALLREICH 001-120-999-5226 150.00 2,497.60 150.00 50457 07/16/98 003239 J & M CONSTRUCTION SECOND PHASE OLD TONN MURAL 280-199-813-5804 2,125.00 50457 07/16/98 003239 J & M CONSTRUCTION SECOND PHASE OLD TOWN MURAL 280-199-813-5804 750.00 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MiSt LDSC AND MAINT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5610 1,967.96 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LDSC AND MAINT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5242 217.00 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LDSC AND MAINT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5242 39.80 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MICS LDSC AND MAINT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5242 50.00 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. SALES TAX 190-180-999-5242 2~.77 50458 07/16/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. SALES TAX 190-180-999-5610 152.52 50459 07/16/98 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. TRANSPORTATION:DAY CAMP TRIP 190-18~-999-5340 242.50 2,875.00 2,451.05 242.50 50460 07/16/98 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES LEAGUE CF:8/26-28 TCSD CONMISS 190-180-999-5258 1,500.00 50461 07/16/98 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL REIMB:25~ TO REPAIR ROAD 001-164-601-5402 4,493.00 50462 07/16/98 LOPEZ, KIN REFUND:SWINNING LESSONS 190-18~-4975 27.00 50462 07/16/98 LOPEZ, KIN REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 27.00 1,500.00 4,493.00 54.00 50463 07/16/98 002229 LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I JUN PRESS CLIPPING SERVICES 280-199-999-5250 236.06 50464 07/16/98 MACKEY, ELIZABETH REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-18~-4975 22.00 50465 07/16/98 MANCINI, SUSAN REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-18~-4975 54.00 50466 07/16/98 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRES 190-183-999-5380 2,552.00 2~6.06 22.00 54.00 2,552.00 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA 07/16/98 10:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERiOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER iTEM AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50467 07/16/98 MARYN, ELAINE REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 72.00 72.00 50468 07/16/98 002497 MISCO 72" WIDE OUTLET STRIP 320-199-999-5221 120.33 120.33 50469 07/16/98 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING SLOPE REPAIR AT SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5415 4,950.00 4,950.00 50470 07/16/98 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 12 MONTHS SUBSCRiPTiON 50470 07/16/98 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 12 MONTHS SUBSCRIPTION 190-180-999-5228 001-16~-604-5228 78.00 78.00 156,00 50471 07/16/98 002105 OLD TOIdN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-161-999-5214 259.87 259.87 50472 07/16/98 0031~ ON TARGET PROMOTIONAL P 4TH OF JULY ADVERTISING CUPS 190-180-999-5254 50472 07/16/98 003144 ON TARGET PROMOTIONAL P SET UP CHARGE 190-180-999-5254 50472 07/16/98 003144 ON TARGET PROMOTIONAL P FREIGHT 190-180-999-5254 50472 07/16/98 003144 ON TARGET PROMOTIONAL P SALES TAX 190-180-999-5254 580.00 46.00 39.12 48.52 713.64 50473 07/16/98 002652 OSCAR'S REFRESHMENT FOR COUNCIL MTG 001-110-999-5260 117.39 117.39 50474 07/16/98 OUELLETEE, KATHERINE D. REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 27.00 27.00 50475 07/16/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI CHAIR FOR CASHIER OFFICE 50475 07/16/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS iNTER! SALES TAX 001-140-999-5601 001-140-999-5601 587.30 45.52 632.82 50476 07/16/98 000733 PARTY PZAZZ 4TH OF JULY EVENT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5238 50476 07/16/98 000733 PARTY PZAZZ 4TH OF JULY EVENT SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5223 591.66 143.52 735.18 50477 07/16/98 PENA, KIRSTEN REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 27.00 27.00 50478 07/16/98 002331 PEP BOYS INC AUTO PARTS & MISC SUPPLIES 001-16~-601-5218 7.52 7.52 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 001-2130 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 19~-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 PERS-PRE 001-2130 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ SURVIVOR 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 50~79 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 50479 07/16/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESm RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 322.43 10.63 21,317.10 438.52 3.39 3,506.08 13.00 32.00 407.11 192.39 1.02 520.54 50.31 582.24 128.36 491.05 263.61 76.51 1.17 13.87 .05 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUHBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50479 50479 50479 50479 50479 50479 50479 50479 50480 50481 50481 50481 50482 50483 50483 50484 50484 50484 50485 50486 50486 50486 50486 50486 50487 50487 50487 50488 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 50489 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 O0O246 002790 000580 000580 000580 000252 000252 000254 000254 000254 002110 002930 002930 002930 002930 002930 002841 0028~1 002841 002176 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PETER-BUILT HONES/PACIT PHOTO WORKS PHOTO WORKS PHOTO WORKS PISCULLI, MARTHA POLYCRAFT, INC. POLYCRAFTt INC. PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CUMPAN PRIME EOUIPMENT PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP RAIN FOR RENT RAIN FOR RENT RAIN FOR RENT RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 8TH & FINAL DRAW:TEN STAGE STP FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS CITY OF TEMECULA VEHICLE DECAL SALES TAX 12 MONTHS SUBSCRIPTION PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0191 PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0154 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PW MAINT TO~ELS & FLOOR MATS RENTAL TObYELS & FLOOR MATS RENTAL TO~ELS & FLOOR MATS RENTAL TO~ELS & FLOOR MATS RENTAL TO~ELS & FLOOR MATS RENTAL IRRIGATION LINES: 4TH OF JULY SALES TAX IRRIGATION LINES: 4TH OF JULY QTRLY BUSINESS PARK ASSOC DUES 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST LSCP 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST LSCP 01-17-80000-1 VIA EDUARDO LDSP 01-06-8~860-5 PUJOL STREET 01-02-98000-0 PAUBA RD -DC 01-02-980101-0 PAUBA RD VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 280-1500 001-171-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 190-180-999-5301 190-183-4975 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-120-999-5228 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-16~-601-5238 340-199-701-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 340-199-702-5212 190-182-999-5250 190-180-99~-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5370 340-199-701-5226 001-164-603-5240 001-16~-003-5240 001-164-601-5250 280-1~9-807-580~ 001-171-9~9-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-9~9-5240 190-184-~9-5240 191-180-9~9-5240 193-180-9~9-5240 3~0-199-701-5240 .14 1.52 .84 1.70 .23 1.86 .93 2.18 5,001.80 10.15 42.71 118.36 27.00 572.00 44.33 124.80 20.50 19.00 82.01 28.60 17.35 13.57 11.20 26.75 1,395.22 61.63 282.78 919.00 43.58 27.63 41.39 39.13 9.28 245.39 5,679.28 103.09 748.51 242.24 179.17 1,972.62 389.12 28,380.78 5,001.80 171.22 27.00 616.33 16~.30 82.01 97.47 1,739.63 919.00 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENOOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50489 50489 50489 50490 50490 50490 50490 50490 50490 50490 50490 50491 50492 50492 50492 50492 50493 50494 50495 50495 50495 50495 50495 50495 50496 50497 50498 50499 50500 50500 50501 50501 50501 50501 50501 50501 50501 50501 50501 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 07/16/98 000262 000262 000262 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 001279 000266 000266 000266 000266 000352 003307 002181 002181 002181 002181 002181 002181 001048 000403 002942 000519 000519 000537 000537 OOO537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 00053? RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR HASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR HASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO NEWS, INC. RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO. EXECUTIVE RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION ROSA~S CANTINA SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA SIERRA PAINTING SKEANS, PATRICIA SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE OETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE OETAILING & GAS AD FOR OLD TOWN ADV COMMITTEE PORTABLE TOILETS RENTAL ~ RVTN 4TH OF JULY ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 4TH OF JULY PORTABLE TOILETS 4TH OF JULY PORTABLE TOILETS ASSESSOR MAP COPIES CFD88-12 ADMINISTRATION COST MAY PRGSS PMT:WINCH/I-15 PRJT RETENTION MAY PGRSS PMT:WINCH JUNE PRGSS PMT:WINCH/I-15 PRJT RETENTION:JUNE PRGSS PMT:WINCH REL RETENTIOR:W]NCH/I-15 PRJT WARRANTY RETENTION:WINCH/I-15 VIP CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST TEM ELEM SCHL POOL MTNC-JUNE EXTERIOR PAINTING-SR CENTER REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS PEST CTRL SERVS- CITY HALL PEST CTRL SERVS-MAINT FAC 2-06-105~0654 VARIOUS METERS 2-10-331-1353 PAUBA ROAD 2-10-331-2153 PUJOL ST 2~09-330-3030 WINCH RD TC1 2-09-330-3139 WINCH RD TC1 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-162-999-5214 001-120-999-5250 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5263 001-163-999-5214 001-161-999-5214 001-161-999-5263 190-180-999-5214 001-120-999-5256 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5220 001-1280 280-199-602-5804 280-2035 280-199-602-5804 280-2035 280-2035 280-2035 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-183-4975 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 191-180-999-5319 001-171-999-5240 190-18~-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 192-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 996.10 173.82 1,368.38 50.00 6.00 12.00 29.41 24.86 13.95 7.15 68.00 105.00 62.89 700. O0 1,102.08 4?_3.88 5.50 13,622.00 916.30 45.82- 916.30 45.82- 16~,951.90 36,979.98- 300.00 538.00 4,350.00 27.00 56.00 40.00 1,376.53 994.13 866.27 139.45 158.71 9,959.09 4,629.17 21,760.24 24,460.53 12,258.73 211.37 105.00 2,288.85 5.50 13,622.00 129,712.88 300.00 538.00 4,350.00 27.00 96.00 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50501 07/16/98 00053~ 50501 07/16/98 000537 50501 07/16/98 000537 50501 07/16/98 000537 50501 07/16/98 000537 50501 07/16/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 50502 07/16/98 000521 STEWART, BRUCE M. 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 2-10-901-796Z VARIOUS METERS 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 52-77-812-1331-01 VI EDUARDO STREET ADDRESSING SERVICE 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-1990 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 193-180-999-5240 001-162-999-5250 8,425.97 6,151.55 1,480.50 155.87 4,543.13 12.53 675.00 85,113.67 675. O0 50503 07/16/98 000305 TARGET STORE 50503 07/16/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR TCSD MISC SUPPLIES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 263.32 58.00 321.32 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50504 07/16/98 000307 50505 07/16/98 000306 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TEMECULA TROPHY CUMPANY TEMECULA TROPHY CC~PANY TEMECULA TROPHY CO#PANY TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 4TH OF JULY AWARD TROPHIES 4TH OF JULY AWARD TROPHIES 4TH OF JULY AWARD TROPHIES 4TH OF JULY AWARD TROPHIES 4TH OF JULY AWARD TROPHIES PARTICIPANT RIBBONS SALES TAX MISC HARDWARE & MAINT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5212 342.05 106.41 9.12 9.12 9.12 136.80 12.72 22.95 625.34 22.95 50506 07/16/98 THOMAS WILDS ASSOC., IN WKBK:AID IN RECORDS RETENTION 001-120-999-5277 130.00 130.00 50507 07/16/98 002111 50508 07/16/98 002396 50509 07/16/98 002621 50510 07/16/98 002065 50510 07/16/98 002065 50510 07/16/98 002065 50511 07/16/98 002576 50512 07/16/98 50513 07/16/98 50514 07/16/98 001342 50515 07/16/98 000339 50516 07/16/98 000621 50517 07/16/98 002109 50517 07/16/98 0021~ 50518 07/16/98 000~5 50518 07/16/98 000345 TOGO'S U S LONG DISTANCE, INC. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNISOURCE UNISOURCE UNISOURCE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO VALENTINE, TERRI WARRICK, JOHN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC WHITE CAP WHITE CAP XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI REFRESHMENT FOR COUNCIL MTG LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER 5415305001995969 GT/CHEVYS ONT (40) 8 1/2 x 11 WHITE PAPER (2) 8 1/2 x 11 PASTEL PAPER SALES TAX SOUTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-MAINT FAC CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP FY 98/99 MISC. PW ~LRINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. PW MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES APR-JUNE LEASE OF 5021 COPIER POOLED MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 001-100-999-5258 320-199-999-5208 001-161-999-5260 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-161-999-5248 190-183-4975 190-183-4975 190-180-999-5212 001-120-999-5228 001-100-999-5226 001-16~-601-5218 001-16~-601-5218 190-182-999-5239 330-199-999-5217 125.54 1,588.29 28.25 996.00 87.00 83.93 1,945.00 27.00 36.00 113.57 90.94 8,500.00 62.97 21.39 59.50 4,880.66 125.54 1,588.29 28.25 1,166.93 1,945.00 27.00 36.00 113.57 90.94 8,500.00 8~.36 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 10:19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 50518 07/16/98 000345 50518 07/16/98 000345 50519 07/16/98 VENDOR NAME XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILL! CLERK OF THE COURT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION POOLED MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES POOLED MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES EMINENT DONAIN:PALA/RAINBW LLC ACCOUNT NUHBER 190-182-999-5217 190-182-999-5217 210-1652 ITEM AMOUNT 137.16 7.~ 295,000.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 5,084.98 295,000. O0 TOTAL CHECKS 1,112,064.37 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOJd/HO0 SET ASIDE 190 COHNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS AMOUNT 414,996.04 4,267.14 8,594.42 8,653.46 149,540.45 4,267.14 15,681.81 TOTAL 606,000.46 VOUCHRE2 07/16/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 50522 50522 50523 50524 50525 50526 50526 50527 50527 50527 50527 50528 50528 50528 50528 50528 50528 50528 50529 50529 50529 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50530 50531 50531 50532 50533 50534 15:32 CHECK DATE 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 07/28/98 VENDOR NUMBER 003216 003216 001916 002802 002128 000164 000164 001056 001056 001056 001056 001429 001429 001429 001429 001429 001429 001429 001383 001383 001383 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 001944 001944 OO2576 003186 000332 VENDOR NAME 1ST MECHAHICAL, INC 1ST MECHANICAL, INC ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT ELLIS GROUP, INC. ENGINEERING VENTURES, I ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE INACOM INFORMATION SY$T INACUM INFORMATION SYST INACON INFORMATION SYST INACUM INFORMATION SYST INACOM INFORMATION SYST INACUM INFORMATION SYST IRACOM INFORMATION SYST P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, IN TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, IN URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN LOGIC CONSULTANTS VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PROG PMT:CRC GYM COOLING SYS. RET.W/H PNT:CRC GYM COOLING SY MAY ENG SRVCS-R.CAL/I-15 BRDG JUN APPRAISAL SRVCS-PALA/79 MAY PROF ENG SRVCS-OVERLAND DR PLAN CHECK SERVICES PLAN CHECK SERVICES JUNE LDSC MAINTENANCE:PARKS JUNE LDSC MAINTENANCE - SLOPES CREDIT:JUN LDSC MAINT CREOIT:JUN LDSC MAINT COMPUTER MEMORY AND HARDWARE INSTALLATION / LABOR FREIGHT SALES TAX WEB SERVER INSTALLATION / LABOR SALES TAX JUNE RDA CONSULTANT SERVICES JUNE RDA CONSULTANT SERVICES dUNE PALA RD CONSULTANT SERVS LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAg ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAg ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVS: MARCH 11 INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL:PALA RD RETENTION W/H lNV#OOO1:PALA RD SOUTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN JUN PROF SVCS:MARGARITA PARK JUNE 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-152-5804 210-2035 210-165-601-5801 210-165-631-5700 001-1280 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 165-199-999-5248 280-199-999-52~8 210-165-631-5801 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5289 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5279 001-170-999-5262 001-1990 210-165-689-5804 210-2035 001-161-999-5248 210-190-119-5804 001-162-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 74,297.40 7,429.74- 29,665.44 19,035.52 6,050.00 11,047.46 6,719.49 8,961.00 8,813.00 366.58- 159.54- 4,783.00 1,080.00 15.97 371.93 7,7'51.00 1,080.00 619.91 4,267.14 4,267.14 601.83 204,271.20 38,781.40 38,502.40 9,724.00 9,625.60 8,641.12 8,6~1.12 26,597.97 2,825.60 7,328.37 15,121.40 4,486.99 30,000.00 3,000.00- 5,445.00 6,370.00 11,186.92 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 66,867.66 29,665.~ 19,035.52 6,050.00 17,766.95 17,247.88 15,681.81 9,136.11 374,547.17 27,000.00 5,445.00 6,370.00 11,186.92 TOTAL CHECKS 606,000.46 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council ~,~Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval PREPARED BY: Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain City records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with State of California Government Code, Sections 34090 through 34090.7. Attached Exhibit "A," lists records from the Finance Department, Accounts Payable Invoices from Fiscal Year 1995/96 O-RAM. These records have been identified within Group IV of the retention schedule, and have been scanned into the City's LaserFiche Imaging System. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5. Attached Exhibit "B", lists records from the Building and Safety Department, plans for completed jobs, from 1993, through July, 1996, Tuffs Index Number 805. These records have been identified within Group XV of the retention schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed the Exhibit, as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: Destruction of Records Request, Finance Department Exhibit "A", List of Records recommended for destruction Destruction of Records Request, Building & Safety Department Exhibit "B", List of Records recommended for destruction r:\flores\destroy.ar DATE: July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a listing of records maintained in the Finance Depa~auem that are eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention Policy. The attached list of records have been idemified within Retention Group IV, as outlined in Exhibit Ul~, Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Governmere Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consera to the desu'uction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. APPROVED: Depaia~ent Head: APPROVED: City Attorney: Date ,~/~~e~partment Peter~Thorson R:~'lores\d¢su'.req DATE: July 28, 1998 '* . ' ,- SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a listing of records maintained in the Finance Department that are eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention Policy. The attached list of records have been identified within Retention Group XV, as outlined in Exhibit "1", Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuam to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consera to the desauction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Head: '/~.hony.-~ln~o, Chief ]~u~l.d, ing Official Date J APPROVED: City Attorney: R:\Flores\d¢str.req EXHIBIT "B" REQUEST FOR DESTRUCTION OF OBSOf,F. TED CITY RECORDS Department Name: City Council Meeting Date: Description: Building and Safety Department 07/28/98 Plans of Completed Jobs - Tuff No. 805, Retention Group XV (See attached listing of 3 pages) Department Name:ltuilding & gafety Storage Location:Building & Safety Plan Room Final/Expire Date Permit No. 7-1%96 B96-1124 7-08-96 B95-0552 2-21-96 B95-1343 3-19-96 B95-2141 5-09-96 B96-0187 6-27-96 B96-0296 12-29-95 B95-0660 2-12-96 B95-1741 6-14-96 B96-0318 12-20-95 B95-2143 3-06-96 B95-1874 EXPIRED B96-0202 EXPIRED B96-2088 EXPIRED B96-1620 EXPIRED B96-0456 RECORD INVENTORY Department No. 162 Type of Records:R,g'R plans for conlpletod jobs Status:Inactive Box No. 23 Address 29379 RANCHO CALWORNIA RD 41986 ROANOAK 20445 SHANANDOAH 40125 STARLING 31122 SHICAL 30985 SANTIAGO 30260 SANTIAGO 31307 SANTIAGO 26631 YNEZ RD 27453 YNEZ RD 30195 YNF_,Z RD 30520 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 30875 RANCHO VISTA RE} 41408 RUE J'ADOT 28900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD Description SINKS ROOM ADD. ROOM ADD. ROOM ADD. ROOM ADD, ROOM ADD. GARAGE ROOM ADD. DECK ~J-ECTRIC FIRE R~PAIR AWNINGS B/W ROOM ADD. SIGNS Are records ready for microfilming: Person taking inventory: I. RODRIGUF. Z Destruction: X Dept. Manager Approval: mU~nNS~OX ~ 1 o f 3 RECORD INVENTORY Department Name:Ruildirtg ~ Safety Department No. 162 Type of Records:Rn, S plans for eom01et~! jobs Storage Location:Ruildi~lg & Safety Plan Room Status:Inactive Box No._2_4._ Final/Expire Date Permit No. Address Description 11-30-95 B95-0037 43665 MANZANO CUSTOM HOME 3-15-96 B95-0957 31760 CALLE VIMIANZO REC. BLDG. 7-30-96 B95-1493 30914 DEL REY SFR 9-26-95 B92-0129 29581 VAI JLFJO SFR EXPIRg. D B95-2163 30130 CABltlLLO GARAGE EXPIRED B96-2163 29760 CALLE PALMAS ROOM ADD. EXPIRgD B96-1616 29575 CARA WAY ROOF REPAIR EXPIRED B96-1617 29575 CARA WAY ROOF REPAIR 9-07-95 B93-1992 31350 RANCHO VISTA NCOM 10-18-95 B93-1993 40516 RORIPAUGH NCOM 1-16-96 B95-0991 41980 WINCHESTER NCOM 12-22-95 B94-1776 40575 WINCHESTER NCOM 6-10-96 B95-0352 40435 WINCHESTER ACOM PaLPLANSBOX.024 2 of 3 Department Name:Building & Safety Storage Location:Building & Safety Plan Room Final/Expire Date Permit No. Expired B96-2251 Expired B93-0179 Expired B95-1021 Expired B96-0976 Expired B96-2117 Expired B96-1949 RECORD INVENTORY Department No. 162 Type of Records:B&S plans for completed jobs Status :Inactive Box No. 25 Address 27455 TIERRA VISTA 30363 SANTA CECILIA 42136 SARAH 40167 VALERIANA 32145 VIA BANDE 40465 WINCHESTER RD Description MEZZINE ROOM ADD. STORAGE ROOM ADD. ROOM ADD. TRUSS Are records ready for microfilming: Person taking inventory: J. RODRIGUEZ Destruction: X Dept. Manager Approval: 3of3 ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY I,~L~ FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analy~s~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. That the City Council authorize the Director of Finance to execute a Sub- Recipient Agreement with the Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VlP Tots) for administration of the 1998-99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. DISCUSSION: On January 27, 1998, the City Council recommended funding for 1998°99 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects. The U.S. Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funding for local projects which meet at least one of the following nationally established goals: Low/moderate income persons are primarily benefitted by the activity; or The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need. The projects and levels of funding approved by the Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) are as follows: Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program Services to Victims and Children of Domestic Violence Parent Center Boys & Girls Club of Temecula Operation School Bell Emergency Food Aide and Supplies Building Project in the City of Temecula Early Intervention Program for Children (VIP Tots) Senior Citizen Expansion 820 6,000 95O 10,000 10,000 10,000 3,175 2,000 83,005 ADA - Play Structure Project Pujiol Street Sidewalks 70,000 89.357 The total CDBG funding to the City 285.307 Execution of the 1 998-99 Fiscal Year Supplemental Agreement and Sub-Recipient Agreement facilitates CDBG funding for these projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocation to outside agencies have no impact to the City, other than staff time needed to administer program requirements. In addition to the $285,307 CDBG funding, the Community Services Program Line Item will fund an additional $70,523 for the identified programs as approved by Council on January 27, 1998. Attachments: Supplemental Agreement Sub-Recipient Agreement-Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots) City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr~ve · Temecula, CA 92590 · Ma~ling Address: P O BOX 9033 · Temecula, CA 92559-9033 (909) 694-6444 · Fax (909) 694-~ 999 CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT Agreement made this 28th day of July, 1998, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a municipal corporation, and Valley Intervemion Program for Tots (VIP Tots), a private, non-profit organization. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: VIP Tots, through its inter-generational volunteer program, matches senior citizens to at- risk families with chronically ill or disabled children. The VIP Tots agrees to provide such services on a first come, first serve basis to all residems of the City of Temecula who need and request such services so long as economic resources permit. The VIP Tots agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request. The VIP Tots shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees, harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts or omissions of VIP Tots with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide the VIP Tots with funds equal to the costs allocable by the City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, and the service provider. Ao VIP Tots may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either canceled checks (from and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City of Temecula Finance Departmere. The City of Temecula will reimburse VIP Tots from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of $2,000 for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 28, 1998. Costs incurred by the VIP Tots before the County's authorization date or anticipated authorization date, on or after July 28, 1998, which are determined by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City. The City of Temecula will request reimbursement for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 28, 1998. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in part, without the written consent of the parties. 6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1999. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all parties. The VIP Tots shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Cooperation Agreemere executed between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula dated July 28, 1998, which governs the use of CDBG funds. VIP Tots shall keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations, and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. VIP Tots shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA VALLEY INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR TOTS (VIP Tots) Genie Roberts Director of Finance Authorized Signature/Title Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 !0 !! 12 13 14 15 16 17 !$ 19 20 21 22 23 24 File No: 0.301, 0.306, 1.135, .136, .137, .139, 1.TM046, .054, .057, .058, .059 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called, "COUNTY," and the City of Temecula, herein called "CITY," mutually agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement dated July 16, 1996 whereby CITY elected to participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to assist and undertake essential community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act" Said Cooperation Agreement dated July 16, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every provision was set forth herein. 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $285,307, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as specifically identified in Exhibit "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K" which is attached hereto and consist(s) of 3 pages (each), and by this reference are incorporated herein, for the projects: ~ 0.301 - Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program (ECWSP) ($820) 25~ 26 27 28 0.306 Services to Victims and Children of Domestic Violence ($9,175) 1.135 - Parent Center ($950) 1.136 - Boys & Girls Club of Temecula ($10.000) 1 1.137 - Operation School Bell ($10,000) 2 1.139 Emergency Food Aid and Supplies ($10,000) 3 1.TM046 - Buildina Project in the City of Temecula ($3,175) 4 1.TM054 - Home-Based Early Intervention Program for Children with 5 Disabilities ($2,000) 6 1.TM057 Senior Citizen Expansion ($83,005) 7 1.TM058 - Americans with Disabilities Act Play Structure ($70,000) 8 1.TM059 - Pujol Street Sidewalks ($89,357) 9 CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development 10 Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior to CITY's 11 construction of same when a project consists of a construction 12 activity. 13 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the 14 projects shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1998 to 15 June 30, 1999, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set 16 forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K" In the event 17 tha5 the project is not substantially completed by the time set forth 18 in 5he completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes, 19 the schedule for the completion of the project may be extended by the 20 period of the enforced delay. Times of performance may also be 21 extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If 22 substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the 23 completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY of the projects is not 24 made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend 25 or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section 26 titled "Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds 27 associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after 28 appropriate notice is given. 1 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall 2 determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received 3 by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs 4 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development 5 Agency, shall: (1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as 6 designated in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K", and (2) 7 monitor the project activity to ensure compliance with applicable 8 federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall 9 comply with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests 10 for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a tl reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY 12 has submitted its letter identifying payments and documentation which 13 supports expenditures. All authorized obligations incurred in the 14 performance of the Agreement must be reported by June 1, 1998 for 15 projects eligible under 570.201(e), Public Services. 16 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate 17 with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing 18 assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public 19 assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its 20 Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the 21 Community Development Block Grant Program. 22 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA 23 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA). Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of 24 Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as 25 the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this 26 Agreement. 27 7. MOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with 28 all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify, save 3 1 and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and their respective 2 agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities, 3 claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action 4 of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but not by way of 5 limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties, 6 and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner 7 connected with the performance by CITY under this Agreement. 8 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS. 9 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in 10 accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as 11 applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal 12 funds under this Agreement. 13 b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG 14 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, 15 F, G, H, I, J and K" 16 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make 17 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban 18 Development for examination and copying all of its records and other 19 materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement. 20 d. CITY-shall not retain any program income as defined 21 in Section 570.500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations. 22 Said program income shall be used only for the activity that is the 23 subject of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement 24 shall apply to such activity. 25 e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving 26 limited clientele (570.208(a) (2) (i), that at least fifty-one percent 27 (51%) of the persons benefitting from the CDBG funded activities are 28 of low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines 4 1 attached as Exhibit IG. 2 3 4 5 The CITY must provide the direct benefit documentation required. 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal regulations and Guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the 6 Act. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the Co~unity Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited in the above-mentioned Cooperation AGreement. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants and employees shall act at all times in an independent capacity durinG the term of this AGreement, and shall not act as, shall not be, nor shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or employees of the COUNTY. 11. TERMINATION. a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this AGreement except upon express written consent of COUNTY. b. COUNTY. NotwithstandinG the provisions of ParaGraph 11a, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this AGreement upon written 22 notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action: 23 (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the 24 covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as 25 provided in this AGreement; and 26 (2) In the event there is a conflict with any 27 federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering 28 any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable. c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement. d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions. 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations which requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Community Development funds. 13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected ~nd appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit "C_~I" and by this reference incorporated herein. b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers, and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the~County,s CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein. 1 c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of 2 exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of 3 interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR 4 570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be 5 reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate 6 for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is 7 appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors 8 listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e). 9 d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall 10 provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants, !1 officers and elected and appointed officials who 12 are in a position to participate in a decision making process, 13 exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside 14 information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under 15 this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any 16 potential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict, 17 that may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under 18 this Agreement. 19 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a 20 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be 21 immediately terminated by the COUNTY. 22 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY 23 shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United 24 States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development or 25 any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24 26 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG funds. 27 15. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever CDBG federal or program income 28 are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or 7 1 personal property, the property shall not be transferred for a period 2 of five (5) years from the date of purchase or completion of 3 construction without COUNTY approval. The CITY shall maintain an 4 inventory for COUNTY review. 5 16. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY 6 agrees to notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify 7 Riverside County JTPD (Jobs Training Partnerships Department) and GAIN 8 - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings 9 that are caused by this project. 10 17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the 11 project funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this 12 Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County of 13 Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the 14 project possible. 15 18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION. CITY shall be 16 monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely 17 compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the effective and 18 efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports 19 shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the 20 end of the quarter being reported. The quarterly written reports 21 shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data 22 elements: 23 ' a. Title of program, listing of components, description 24 of activities/operations. 25 b. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also 26 the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify 27 by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting 28 the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1! 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 in meeting goals. c. Beneficiaries Provide the following: 1) Total number of direct beneficiaries 2) Percent of total number of direct beneficiaries who are: · Low and moderate income · Low income · Black, not Hispanic origin · White, not Hispanic origin · Hispanic · American Indian/Alaskan Native · Asian or Pacific Islander · Female Headed Households 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this Agreement together with the cooperation Agreement between the parties, embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to the subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between the parties at the time of execution. 20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY. // // 28j // 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21. modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY respectively. DATED: MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be and CITY ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors By: Deputy (Seal) DATED: ATTEST: CITY OF Temecula JV:AA: jh F: \USERS\CDBG\ lST\SUPAGR98. 046 \1. TM046 By: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 10 EXHIBIT A Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 0.301 Sponsor: Address: Riverside County Department of Community Action STOP #2590 Riverside. CA 92507 Project Title: Location: Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program Countywide Description: CDBG funds will be used to pay costs associated with the operation of 4 cold weather shelters in Riverside County. Project costs include rent, utilities, supplies, and other costs. This project provides emergency shelter for homeless during the winter months (November - March). Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula. Project Budget: !) Architect/Engineer Design Costs 2) Administration Costs s Cost CDBG Approved S 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 820 TOTAL This project is being funded by: ist District 4th District Banning San Jacinto Temecula Desert Hot Springs 4,660 4,660 2,571 1,550 S20 1.500 820 TOTAL $15,761 EXHIBIT B Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 0.306 Sponsor: Alternative to Domestic Violence Address: P.O. Box 910 Riverside, CA 92502 Project Title: Comprehensive Service to Victims of Domestic Violence Location: Description: ADV provides victims of domestic violence with an outreach support program. CDBG funds will be used for costs that include salaries/benefits and operating expenses (telephone, rent, etc.) The funds will allow ADV to continue and expand current services such as transitional housing services, crisis intervention counseling, emergency shelter, and advocacy services, throughout Riverside County. ADV serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance $ 6,000 TOTAL $ $ 6,000 ?his project is being funded by: First District Second District Third District Fifth District Banning ~{urrieta ?emecula Lake Elsinore TOTAL $15,000 $15,000 $ii,500 $23,000 $ 3,000 $12,960 S 6,000 $ 2,5oo $89,960 EXHIBIT C Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.135 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: Parent Center-Murrieta Valley Unified School District 24515.Lincoln Ave. Murrieta, CA 92562 Parent Center 24515 Lincoln Ave., Murrieta, CA 92562 Description: The program will provide 750 parents with English as a second language, GED, parenting, and math classes. In addition, workshops on parenting issues relating to youth and drugs, alcohol abuse, gang participation, homework strategies and child development. Funds will be used for salaries, supplies, equipment, training, utilities and rent. The Parent Center serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no sez-vices rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ S 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance $ 95O !0 Contingency TOTAL $ S 950 This project is being funded by: First District $10,000 Murrieta $ 5,676 Temecula $ 950 TOTAL $16,626 EXHIBIT D Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.136 Sponsor: Boys & Girls Club of Temecu!a Address: 27475 Ynez Rd., Ste. 232 Temecula, CA 92591 Project Title: Location: Boys & Girls Club of Temecula Off Track Program 28790 Pujol St., Temecula, CA Description: Funds will be used to provide child care services through the off-track and Am/Pm program, Monday through Friday. The program will run year round providing child care for 520 school age children from 1st grade through 8th grade. These children are from low/moderate income families, 30% from 1st District unincorporated area and 70% between the city of Temecula and Murrieta. Teen Program for the Boys and Girls Club of Temecula will provide educational, vocational, artistic and recreational programs to 400 youth of low and moderate income families. Funds will be used for tuition, supplies, equipment and travel. Boys & Girls Club of Temecula serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County. of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs 2) Administration Costs Cost CDBG Approved S 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Re!ocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance $ 10,000 TOTAL This project is being funded by: First District: Murrieta Temecuia TOTAL $37,960 $18,630 $10,000 $66,590 S $ 10,000 EXHIBIT E Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.137 Sponsor: Assistance League of Temecula Valley Address: 42913 Ca!le Londe Temecula, CA 92592 Project Title: Operation School Bell Location: 28720 Via Montezuma Description: Operation School Bell will provide new clothing and school supplies for approximately 800 school age children of the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, and the Temecula School District. The clothing provided consists of shoes, 3 pairs of socks, underclothing, jeans, slacks or skirts, sweatshirt and jacket. Operation School Bell serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by the City of Temecula. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs S s 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance $ 10,000 !0) Contingency TOTAL s S 10.000 This project is being funded by: First District Murrieta Temecula Lake Elsinore TOTAL $10,000 $ 7,280 $10,000 $ 2,50o $29,780 EXHIBIT F Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.139 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Valley, Inc. P.O. Box 987 Temecula, CA 92593 Emeraency Food Aide and Supplies/Facility Rent 40250 Winchester Road, Temecula, CA 92593 Description: The senior center provides an emergency food program for 28,000 individuals that may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and migrant farm workers. CDBG funds will be used to purchase food and supplies, also operational cost, salaries, and transportation. Emergency Food Aid and Supplies Project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the City of Temecula. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved !) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs Operation/Maintenance $ 10,000 10 Contingency TOTAL $ $ 100000 This project is being funded by: First District $10,000 Murrieta $ 5,676 Temecula $10,000 TOTAL $25,676 EXHIBIT G Page 1 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: FILE: 1.TM046 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley P.O. Box 0765 Murrieta. CA. 92564-0765 Building Project in the City of Temecula Site to be Identified Description: Habitat for Humanity proposes to use CDBG funds to construct a home in the City of Temecula for a low income family. Site to be identified once the entitlement fees have been completed with the City of Temecula. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation'Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ Cost CDBG Approved S $ 3. 175 $ 3. 175 EXHIBIT G Page 2 FILE: 1.TM046 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Select Site for Home Site Preparation Purchase Supplies Completion Start Date 7/98 1/99 2/99 Completion Date 12/98 3/99 4/99 6/99 EXHIBIT G Page 3 FILE: 1.TM046 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRlkM FROM o PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1998 June 30, 1999 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-98-UC-06-0506 o X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Building Project in the City of Temecula 1. TM046 Categorically Excluded 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley !0. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 245-4943 Habitat for Humanity proposes to use CDBG funds to construct a home in the City of Temecula for a low family. Site to be identified once the entitlement fees have been completed with the City of Temecula. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (m) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (2) (i) (B) il. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Construct one (1) home !3. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGPJ%M YEAR FUNDS (in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SI~RY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) S S S Housing Services $ 3,175 14. Totals $ 3,175 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 3,175 EXHIBIT A Page 3 FILE: 0.301 EXHIBIT H Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.TM054 Sponsor: V.I.P. Tots Address: 41915 Acacia Ave. Hemet, CA. 92544 Project Title: Location: Early Intervention Proaram for Children with Disabilities City of Temecula Description: V.I.P. Tots will offer a comprehensive home-base early intervention program for children with disabilities and their families. Early intervention services include education, therapy and support to eligible children and their families to minimize or prevent developmental delays, provided in home- based environments. CDBG funds will be use for salaries equipment and supplies. ' The Early Intervention Program serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ Cost CDBG Approved S $ 2,000 S $ 2.000 EXHIBIT H Page 2 FILE: 1.TM054 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Begin Project Start Date 07/0~/98 Completion Date Monthly Direct Benefit Activity Report Monthly Claim Submittal (Submittal of Final Claim for Reimbursement) Submit Quarterly Report (In accordance with section 26 of the Sponsor's Agreement) Site Visit Monitoring o8/9s 08/98 Ol/99 06/30/99 06/01/98 09/30/98 12/30/98 03/30/99 06/30/99 Program Complete 06/30/98 EXHIBIT H Page 3 FILE: 1.TM054 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1998 June 30, 1999 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-98-UC-06-0506 o X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Early Intervention Program for Children with Disabilities 1.TM054 Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER V.I.P. Tots (909) 652-7611 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: V.i.P. Tots will offer a comprehensive home-based early intervention program for children with disabilities and their families. Early intervention services include education, therapy and support to eligible children and their families to minimize or prevent developmental delays, provided in home-based environments. CDBG funds will be use for salaries, equipment and supplies. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (e) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (2) (i) (A) 11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Early intervention services will be provided to 20 children with disabilities. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities-using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) S S S Public Services $ 2,000 14. Totals S 2,000 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 2,000 EXHIBIT I Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.TM057 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: Description: City of Temecula, Community Services Dept. 43200 Business Park Dr., P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92590 Senior Citizen Expansion 41854 6th Street, Temecula Funds will be used to off-set the cost associated with the design and construction of additional meeting rooms, activity space and kitchen improvements at the Mary Phillips Senior Center. This will be a three year project. (3) Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Costs 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Design/Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance !0) Contingency TOTAL S Cost $ 83,005 CDBG Approved S $ S 83,005 EXHIBIT I Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Milestone Prepare Plan, Specifications and Bid Documents Advertise for Bids Award Contract Notice to Proceed Construction Start Date ~0/98 ~1/98 1/99 2/99 2/99 FILE: 1.TM057 Completion Date 1~/98 12/98 6/99 EXHIBIT I Page 3 FILE: 1.TM057 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO 4. July 1, 1998 June 30, 1999 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-98-UC-06-0506 X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIROnmENTAL REVIEW STATUS Senior Citizen Expansion 1.TM057 Categorically Excluded 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NI3MBER City of Temecuta, Community Services Dept. (909) 694-6480 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Funds will be used to off-se~ the cost associated with the design and construction of additional meeting rooms, activity space and kitchen improvements at the Mary Phillips Senior Center. This will be a three (3) year project. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (c) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (2) (i) (A) !i. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S) N/A 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Construction of meeting room, activity space and kitchen improvements 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) S S S Public Facilities $ 83,005 14. Totals $ 83,005 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 83,005 EXHIBIT J Page 1 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: Description: SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Play Structure Project - ADA 30875 Rancho Vista, Temecula, 92589 FILE: 1.TM058 The project will remove barriers and replace an existing play structure in the park that do not meet ADA requirements. Rehabilitating the play surface and equipment will make the park accessible to persons with physical disabilities and bringing it into ADA compliance. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ Cost CDBG Approved S $ 70,000 $ 70,000 EXHIBIT J Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Milestone Prepare Plan, Specifications and Bid Documents Advertise for Bids Award Contract Notice to Proceed Construction Start Date 10/9s 1/99 2/99 2/99 FILE: 1.TM058 Completion Date 12/9s EXHIBIT J Page 3 FILE: 1.TM05~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1998 June 30, 1999 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER Play Structure Project - ADA 1.TM058 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-98-UC-06-0506 o X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Categorically Excluded 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Temecula (909) 694-6480 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The project will remove barriers and replace an existing play structure in the park that do not meet ADA requirements. Rehabilitating the play surface and equipment will make the park accessible to persons with physical disabilities and bringing it into ADA compliance. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (c) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (2) (i)(A) !1. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S) Replace playground surface and equipment in order to meet ADA compliance. 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) S S S Public Facilities $ 70,000 14. Totals S 70,000 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 70,000 EXHIBIT K Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.TM059 Sponsor: Address: Project Title: Location: Description: Design and construction of curb, gutter, approximately 1,350 feet on Pujol Street, street ends to the south. City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA. 92589-9033 Pujol Street Sidewalks Pujol Street, Temecula sidewalk and landscaping from Main Street to where the Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Costs 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Design/Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance !0) Contingency TOTAL S Cost CDBG Approved S $ 89,357 $ 89,357 EXHIBIT K Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Prepare Plan, Specifications and Bid Documents Advertise for Bids Award Contract Notice to Proceed Construction Start Date 10/98 11/98 1/99 2/99 2/99 FILE: 1.TM059 Completion Date ~/98 12/98 6/99 EXHIBIT K Page 3 FILE: 1.TM055 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO 4. o July 1, 1998 June 30, 1999 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-98-UC-06-0506 X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Pujol Street Sidewalks 1.TM059 Categorically excluded 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Temecula (909) 694-6412 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Design and construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping on Pujol Street, from Main Street to where the street ends to the south, 1350 feet. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (c) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (1) (i) 11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT (S) 432.05 Low/Mod 1.774/1.666 94% 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Construct 1,350 feet of curb, gutter and sidewalk on Pujol Street 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) $ S Public Facilities $ 89,357 14. Totals $ 89,357 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 89,357 Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4 570.611 Conflict of interest. (a) Applicability. (1) In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at § 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A 110, respectively, shall apply. (2) In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals, businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to § 570.202, or grants, loans and-other assistance to businesses, individuals and other private entities pursuant to § 570.203, § 570.204 or § 570.455). (b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay salaries and other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG activities assisted under this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the above restrictions shall apply.to all activities that are a part of the UDAG project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. (c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated public agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part. (d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be considered only after the recipient has provided the following: (1) A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description of how the public disclosure was made; and Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4 (2) (e) (2) (3) (4) (s) (6) An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law. Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable: Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would otherwise not be available; Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive bidding or negotiation; Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provided to the group or class; Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions or responsibilities, or the decision making process with respect to the specific assisted activity in question; Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section; Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the person affected when weighed against the public interest served by avoiding the prohibited conflict; and (7) Any other relevant considerations. Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interes Exhibit CI, page 3 of 4 Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 1 of 2) TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: October 1989 This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24 CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments,, require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts. 1) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the selection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported by Federal Funds if a conflict of interest real or apparent would be involved. ' , 2) Such a conflict will arise when: i) ii) i±i) iv) The employee, officer or agent; Any member of the immediate family; His/Her partners, or; An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award. 3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4. A grantee,s or sub-grantee,s officers, employees or agents will be presumed to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the following: i) Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. ii) Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4 TOPIC: DATE: iii) iv) v) 5) CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 2 of 2) October 1989 Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity or trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10- percent interest or more. ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council / ~,.Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Accept Substitute Labor and Materials Security in Parcel Map No. 28471-1 (Located Southwesterly of the Intersection of Winchester Road and Zevo Drive PREPARED BY~F' Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: ACCEPT the Substitute Labor and Materials security for public street, and water and sewer improvements. AUTHORIZE release of the cash deposit which secured Labor and Materials. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Parcel Map No. 28471-1 on August 12, 1997, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreement with: Westside Business Centre, LLC P.O. Box 460160 Escondido, CA 92046 for the improvement of streets, sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the agreement were cash deposits as follows: In the amount of $89,000 inclusive for Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials. In the amount of $89,000 for Maintenance Retention(Faithful Performance Warranty) including sewer and water. In the amount of $3,000 for the installation of subdivision monumentation. -1- r.~agd~t\98~0728~pm284711 .tub On June 16, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized release of the Subdivision Monumentation cash deposit and the Faithful Performance portion of the combined purpose Faithful Performance and Labor and Material cash deposit as follows: Cash deposit in the amount of one-half of the combined security = $44,500 The remaining portion of this combined purpose cash deposit is to be retained for the contractual six-month lien period. If no claims are made for labor and/or materials then Staff will recommend release of the remaining cash deposit as follows: Cash deposit in the amount of $44,500 for Labor and Materials The developer has submitted substitute security for the cash deposit for Labor and Materials and seeks acceptance of this security posted by Scripps Bank as follows: Letter of Credit No. 04-497 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $44,500 and release of the following cash deposit: Cash Deposit in the amount of $44,500 for Labor and Materials Subject to no claims being filed against the development for public improvement labor and materials, Staff will recommend release of this security on or after December 16, 1998. The public streets within this subdivision, Bostik Court (formerly Springfield Circle), Colt Court, and portions of Winchester Road and Zevo Drive, will be recommended to the City Council for acceptance at a later date. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Letter of Credit No. 04-497 (On file) -2- r:\agdq~t\98~0728~pm 284711 .lub FD! AND P VICINITY MAP DETAIl ~_ ~8 20 ~4 NOT .. P¥ 2408&.I PARr, EL 3 PARCEL I PM ~ PM 187/'~ ~0 ... ill!l~c~ ROAD-- PARCF, I, MAP NO. ?.g471-1 ,ocation Mat NOTE: MAP~ NOT TO RCAT,E ITEM 7 A..ROVA, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~-"~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Authorize Deletion of Condition of Approval for Street Lighting as Public Improvement Requirement in Tracts No. 21818, 21821, and 23583 (Meadowview Area) PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works /~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELETING CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TRACTS NO. 21818, 21821, AND 23583 WHICH REQUIRED STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION IN THE MEADOWVIEW AREA BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 21818, on June 25, 1991, Tract Map No. 21821 on July 2, 1991, and Tract Map No. 23583 on December 18, 1990, and entered into subdivision agreements with Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation. A Condition of Approval for each tract on these County-approved tentative tract maps was the installation of street lights. As the housing recession delayed development of all three tracts, the physical installation of street lights has not occurred as of this date. The attached letter from the Meadowview Community Association expresses a concern with the installation of street lights within the Meadowview area and requests a waiver of this requirement for several of the referenced tracts. Staff has added the other tract (Tract No. 21821) to reflect the developments conditioned for street lighting that are under or close to development at this time. The Condition of Approval for these City Council approved, recorded and bonded tracts as established by the County upon recommendation of the Office of the Road Commissioner reads, in part, as follows: ! r:\agd~pt~98~OO728\tr21818.par/eke 'Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision ......... ' It is suggested that the City Council consider and act upon the request of the Meadowview Community Association to delete this Condition of Approval thus establishing a policy for any placement of street lighting in the subject area. The approval of this deletion will facilitate City Council acceptance of the public improvements in Tract No. 21818 being considered on July 28, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 98- with Location Maps for Tracts 21818, 21821, and 23583 Meadowview Community Association letter dated July 15, 1998. r: \agdrpt\9e~00728~tr21618. par/akc RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELETING CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TRACT MAPS NO. 21818, 21820 AND 23583 WHICH REQUIRED STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION IN THE MEADOWVIEW AREA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council approved Tract Maps No. 21818, 21821, and 23583 as conditioned by the County of Riverside at Tentative Map Approval; and, WHEREAS, the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Maps No. 21818, 21821, and 23583, required that street lighting be installed: WHEREAS, the Meadowview Community Association has requested that the Condition of Approval requiring street light installation be deleted; and, WHEREAS, the City Council may waive or delete this Condition of Approval to facilitate the character of development consistent with the existing area. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council desires to delete the Condition of Approval requiring street light installation in the Meadowview area and particularly for Tract Maps No. 21818, 21821, and 23583. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby authorizes the deletion of the Condition of Approval requiring installation of street lighting for Tract Maps No. 21818, 21821, and 23583, as shown on attached Location Maps.. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk r:~agdrpt\98\00728~tr21818. par/akc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 4 r.\agd q~t~98~OO728~tr 21616.par/eke mmm~ .?J ! Tract No. 21818 l,ocation Map NOTF,: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,F, Tract No. ~! 821 ~ocatlon Man NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,F. VlCWlTY MAP ,° / MB. Tract No. ~3583 Lo~.ation_Ma~ NOTE,: MAPS NOT TO RC. ALF, Meadowview Community Association July 15, 1998 City of Temecula Community Service District Attention: Herman Parker, Director Subject: Waiver of Street Light Requirements for Tracts 23583 and 21818 in the Meadowview Community Association The Board of Directors of the Meadowview Community Association requests that the Temecula CSD waive the streetlight requirements for tracts 23583 and 21818. No other area of Meadowview'have street lights. Such lighting in these areas will detract from the rural ambiance of our community for new owners but also for the existing owners who will be impacted by the additional lighting. Additionally, it will create small areas with streetlighting assessments within a larger area that does not have such assessments. These tracts are currently under construction. The Meadowview Board of Directors requests that you give this matter attention at your earliest possible convenience. If there is any additional information that we can provide, please contact our Office Manager, Gayle Gerrish, at 676-4429. Mark Kramer, President Meadowview Board of Directors CC: Ron Roberts, Mayor Ron Bradley, City Manager Joe Kisac, Public Works Director P.O. Box 788 · Temecula, California 92593 · (909) 676-4429 · Fax (909) 695-2409 ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY jr DIRECTOR OF FINANCI~.,~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21818 subject to City Council Resolution No. 98- deleting Public Street Lighting in the Meadowview Area ( Westerly of intersection of Via Norte at Kahwea Road) PREPARED BY: .,~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 21818 subject to the approval of City Council Resolution No. 98- which deletes the Condition of Approval requiring Public Street Lighting in the Meadowview Area. AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten-percent (10%) warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On June 25, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 21818, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Bedford Development Company for the improvement of street and drainage, installation of water systems, and subdivision monumentation, and traffic signalization mitigation fees. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Instruments of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial Corporation as follows: Instrument of Credit in the amount of $442,000 ($365,500, and $74,500, for street and drainage, and water system, respectively) to cover faithful performance. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $221,000 ($184,000 and $37,500, for street and drainage, and water system, respectively) to cover labor and materials. 3. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $14,500 to cover subdivision monumentation. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $4,350.00 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees. ! r.\agdrpt~ 98\00728~tr21818.par/akc Mesa Homes sold the project subsequent to recording the tract map. The new developer is: Barrick/Grimm 746 S. Main Street, Suite Fallbrook, CA 92028 The new developer submitted replacement agreements and security for the contractual work. The substituted securities are Letters of Credit issued by Scripps Bank as follows: Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-454 in the total amount of $442,000 ($365,500, and $74,500, for Street and Drainage, and Water System, respectively) to cover Faithful Performance. Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-453 in the total amount of $221,000 ($184,000, and $37,500, for Street and Drainage, and Water System, respectively) for Labor and Materials. Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-452 in the amount of $14,500 for Subdivision Monumentation Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-451 in the amount of $4,350 for Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees. On July 14, 1998, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount by the fifty-percent (50%) maximum permitted under Section 6.(b) of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The security was reduced to the following amount: Street and Drainage, and Water System Improvements LOC No. 01-454 $221,000 Public Works Staff has reviewed and approved the public works improvements excepting the street lighting which has been deleted by City Council Resolution No. 98- on July 28, 1998. The Rancho California Water District has approved the water system improvements. The sewer system is by private septic tank and leach fields and was not bonded. Therefore Staff recommends acceptance of the public improvements subject to City Council approving deletion of the street light requirements, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and further reduction of the Faithful Performance security to the following ten-percent (10%) warranty amount: Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-454 for Faithful Performance Warranty for Street and Drainage, and Water System Improvements in the amount of $44,200 The developer was also required to post security for Labor and Materials which will be held for the contractual six-month lien period following City Council acceptance of the public improvements. The Subdivision Monumentation will be reviewed and approved and then recommended to City Council for release of the following security when appropriate: Instrument of Credit No. 01-452 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $14,500 2 r.\aodrpt~96~00728~tr21818.par/akc The public streets within this tract are being accepted into the City Maintained -Street System by City Council Resolution No. 98- at this time. The streets to be accepted are Baccarat Road and a portion of Kahwea Road (formerly Green Meadow Road). Portions of Via Norte, Avenida Centenario, Avenida Del Reposo, and Avertida Buena Suerte are within the Tract boundary but were previously within the County Maintained-Road system at the time of City Incorporation and became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession on December 1, 1989.. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Location Map $ r, \agd rpt~,98~00728~tr 21818.par/akc "~1t'ICINITY' t,~P 310 ~88 Tract No. 21818 *'~ocation Man NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAT,F, ITEM 9 APPROVAL ~, ~"'"' CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~,~,~_ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No. 24134-1. (Southeasterly of Intersection of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: ~,~/~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities for Street and Drainage, and Water and Sewer System Improvements in Tract No 24134-1. 2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 24134-1 and entered into subdivision agreements with: Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation (Now KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, LLC) for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, subdivision monumentation and traffic signalization mitigation fees. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Instruments of Credit posted by Butterfield Financial Corporation in the following amounts: 1. $901,500 ($623,000, $146,500, and $132,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. $451,000 ($311,500, $73,500, and $66,000, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. 3. $27,500 to cover subdivision monumentation. 4. $12,750 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees. R:~,GDRPT~98\0728\TR241341.1=i2 On June 11, 1991, the City Council accepted substitute Instruments of Credit for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials securities. Subsequent to the recordation of Tract No. 24134-1, it was discovered that the developer's engineer had overestimated the construction costs for street and storm drain improvements by $112,500. The resulting revised security amounts were as follows: 1. $789,000 ($510,500, $146,500, and $132,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for revised street and drainage costs, and original water and sewer costs. 2. $395,000 ($255,500, $73,500, and $66,000, respectively) to cover labor and material for revised street and drainage costs, and original water and sewer costs. On December 10, 1996, City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, reduced faithful performance security amounts to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amounts, and accepted the following securities in substitution for warranty purposes and for materials and labor as posted by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as surety: Bond No. 100869980-96-041 in the amount of $78,900 for Faithful Performance Warranty. Bond No. 100869980-96-041 in the amount of $395,000 for Labor and Materials. On May 27, 1997, the City Council authorized the release of the subdivision monumentation security. Public Works Staff has reviewed the public improvements and all required repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Therefore, Staff recommends release of the following security: Bond No. 100869980-96-041 in the amount of $78,900 for Faithful Performance Warranty. The developer was required to post Labor and Materials security for payment to providers of labor and materials. This security is held for a contractual six-month lien period subsequent to City Council acceptance of the public improvements. The contractual lien period having expired and no claims having been placed against this security, Staff recommends release of the following bond: Bond No. 100869980-96-041 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $395,000 The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96-150 on December 10, 1996. The streets within the subdivision are Cala Rosso, Via Campanario, Corte Siero, Corte Cabello, Corte Abanilla, and portions of Amarita Way, Via Rami, and Pauba Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Location Map 2 R:~A. GDRPT~98\0728\TR241341 VICINITY MAP / / Project Site ( "-'~00'°u / / / Tract No. 24134-1 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,E ITEM 10 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/j~I"'-~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: Release Securities for Traffic Signalization Mitigation in Tracts No. 24131-2 and 24131-3 (NW'Iy of Meadows Parkway at Leena Way) ~/~[onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ibert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council: AUTHORIZE release of securities for Traffic Signalization Mitigation in Tracts No. 24131-2 and 24131-3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 24131-2 on May 24, 1994, and Tract Map No. 24131-3 on December 12, 1995, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements with the developer, KRDC, Inc., including deferment agreements for payment of traffic signal mitigation fees. Bonds were posted by the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company as follows: Tract No. 24131-2: Bond No. 08510086990-94-15 in the amount of Tract No. 24131-3: Bond No. 100869980-95-059 in the amount of $13,950 $13,500 Where securities are posted in accordance with the agreements, these securities are generally held in full until the traffic signalization mitigation fees have been paid for all of the lots within the subdivision. The fees have been paid for all lots in both subject tracts. Therefore Staff recommends the release of the following two bonds: Bond No. 08510086990-94-15 for Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees in Tract No. 24131-2 in the amount of $13,950 Bond No. 100869980-95-059 for Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees in Tract No 24131-3 in the amount of $13,500 1 R:~,GDRPT~98\0728\TR241312.3TS These fee amounts were established under County policies and adopted by the City of Temecula at $150 per single-family dwelling unit. Subsequent to the recording of a number of developments where such securities and agreement were required, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-09 adding a new chapter to the Development Code and established and implemented a Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (DIF) program, which superseded the per/lot fees. The current DIF traffic mitigation fees were established by and are subject to adjustment by City Council Resolution and are now based on building square footage rather than the per dwelling unit fees or gross acreage fees previously established. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Location Map 2 R:~A GDRPT~.98~0728\TR 241312.3TS VICINITY MAP TRACT MAPS NO. ?.4131-?~ AND ?.4131-3 Location Mall NOT~.: MAPS NOT TO ~qC..AT.F. ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~./~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No 21818) (Located westerly of intersection of Via Norte at Kahwea Road) PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACT NO. 21818) BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract No. 21818 on June 25, 1991, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreement for construction of street and drainage, and water system improvements with Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation. The City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract on July 28, 1998, and initiated the one-year warranty period. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Baccarat Road and a portion of Kahwea Road (Formerly Green Meadow Road). Those portions of Via Note, Avenida Centenario, Avenida Del Reposo, and Avenida Buena Suerte within the tract boundary were part of the County Maintained-Road System prior to City incorporation and became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession on December 1, 1989 FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 98- with Exhibits "A" and "B", inclusive. 1 R:LA ODRP'~98107281TR2 ~8 f 8. STS RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEl'lING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21818) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted offer of dedication of certain lots for street and public utility purposes made by Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation, with the recordation of Tract Map No. 21818; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No. 21818 on July 28, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula, described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of July, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 2 R:MGDRPT~98107281TR2~Sl&$TS (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a reg,_flar meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 R:MODRPT~98tO728~TR2 f818.$TS EXHIBIT 'A' TO RESOLSON NO. 95 Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecuia as indicated on Tract Map No. 21818, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots "F" and "G", as shown on Tract Map No. 21818, f'ded 3 July 1991, in Book 233 of Maps, Pgs 36-42 Incl., further described as follows: Lots "A" & 'B"** Lot 'C" ** Lot "D" ** LOt "E" ** Lot 'F" Portion of Via Norte Portion of Avenida Del Reposo Portion of Avenicla Buena Suerte Portion of Avenida Centenario Portion of Kahwca Road (formerly Green Meadow Road) Baccarat Road ** Streets included in the County Maintained-Road System prior to City Incorporation. These became part of the City M~int~ined-Strcet System by succession December 1, 1989. 4 R:tAC. DRPTI98iO7281TR21818. STS EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 98- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED- STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: ~,x VICINITY IddP NOTF.: MAP; NOT TO · TRE. ET$ OR PORTIONS OF TO n£ ACC~ INTO crrY ITEM 12 APPROVAL I~! CITY ATTORNEY ~'uuw DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue, Project No. PW97-21 and the Traffic Signal on Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle North/West, Project PW97-30 PREPARED BY: illJam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects ~Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue, Project No. PW97-21 and the Traffic Signal on Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle North/West, Project PW97-30. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved the proposed Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue (PW97-12) and the traffic signal installation at the intersection of Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle North/West (PW97-30) in this year's Capital Improvement Program. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. We are concurrently seeking final authorization to advertise for bids from Caltrans. These two (2) projects have been combined into one (1) set of plans and specifications titled, "Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue, Project No. PW97-21 ", to expedite the design and construction work. This project will construct raised median islands on Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and Enterprise Circle North/West. The project includes landscaping and irrigation within the median islands and a new traffic signal at the intersection of Enterprise Circle North/West. Also, the existing traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue will be interconnected. The estimated total cost for this project is $400,000. The street improvements will be funded by Measure A and the traffic signal will be funded by both Signal Mitigation (DIF) and Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. The plans and specifications for this project are available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project funded through Measure A, Signal Mitigation (DIF), and Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. These funds have been appropriated in Accounts No. 210-165-686-5804 and 210-165-673-5804. R:\AGDRPT~98\0728\PW97-21 .BID ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~ CITY MANAGER -,~-- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council .~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29 PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects ~,-;~ All Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW97-29, the traffic signal installation at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas in the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction. Installation of a traffic signal at this location was approved by the City Council to provide a safe access to the apartment complex and the medical complex on Via Las Colinas. The intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas is the only access point to the apartment complex and the medical facility on Via Las Colinas. The project includes installation of a 4-way traffic signal and minor signing and striping at this location. This signal will be interconnected and coordinated with the other traffic signals along Rancho California Road. Installation of this signal also requires an easement from the owners of the Town Center Plaza for installation and maintenance of a portion of the signal equipment. The estimated construction cost for this project is $90,000. The plans and specifications for this project are available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through Signal Mitigation Fees and the State Transportation Program (STP). These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165-671-5804. r:\aodrpt\98\O72~pw97- 29.bid/ajp ITEM 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council '~oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening - Phase I, Project No. PW97-03 PREPARED BY: ~/J~fwilliam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening - Phase I, Project No. PW97-03. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening for this year's Capital Improvement Program. This is the first of two phases in widening the southbound off-ramp. Phase I will widen the southbound off-ramp from Winchester Road to the Santa Gertrudes Creek. This project has been phased so that lengthy bridge structural reviews and complicated Caltrans processing do not delay partial traffic relief at an early date. Phase I will create a new exclusive left turn lane and modify the existing "left and through" lane to also allow a right turn movement. To accommodate this widening, the southbound entrance loop ramp will be moved to the east. This project will also modify the striping along Winchester Road. The new striping will provide one additional eastbound right turn lane onto the northbound entrance loop ramp and an additional eastbound right turn lane onto Ynez Road. We are currently negotiating a design contract for Phase II. Phase II will widen and lengthen the remaining portion of the ramp, which includes widening the bridge over the Santa Gertrudes Creek. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed for Phase I and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The estimated total cost for Phase I is $140,000. This project will be funded by Redevelopment Agency funds. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Redevelopment Agency fees. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 210-165- 697-5804. R :~.G DR.I~T~9~72~PW97-03 .BID ITEM 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCEz~-~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council ~/~L--'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids for Storm Drain Improvements for the Overland Drive Improvements and Margarita Road Street Widening - Project No. PW97-07 PREPARED BY: ~'~/~William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for a portion of Project No. PW97-07, Storm Drain Improvements for the Overland Drive Improvements and Margarita Road Street Widening Project. BACKGROUND: The City and Forest City Development California, Inc. and LGA-7 Inc., an Illinois Corporation entered into a Development Agreement on December 17, 1996 by which the City agreed to design and construct certain storm drain facilities in connection with the Promenade Mall. To meet Forest City Development's schedule it is necessary to have new storm drain improvements in place by October 15, 1998. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed for the storm drain and we expect to receive authorization from the Army Corps of Engineer's to proceed shortly. This project will construct a new storm drain system in Margarita Road south of Winchester Road, box culverts under Margarita Road and Overland Drive and an open channel south of the Mall site between Margarita Road and Overland Drive. The storm drain project will be followed with a street improvement projects later this summer. This project will impact Margarita Road and will include detours and temporary roadways. The estimated construction cost for this project is $1,300,000. The plans and specifications for this project are available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Street Improvements, Public Services, and Public Facilities. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165- 696-5804 and No. 210-165-681-5804. r:\agdrpt\98\0728\pw97-07. bid/ajp APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ./~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Solicitation of Bids for the Construction Improvements and Authorization to Order Pipe - Project No. PW97-07 PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Plans and Specifications for Storm Drain Construction on Margarita Drive from Winchester Road southerly. 2. Authorize staff to solicit bids for the construction. 3. Authorize staff to pre-order the pipe for the construction of the above storm drain. BACKGROUND: The City and Forest City Development California, Inc. and LGA-7 Inc., an Illinois Corporation entered into a Development Agreement on December 17, 1996 by which the City agreed to design and construct certain storm drain facilities in connection with the Promenade Mall. To meet Forest City Development's schedule it is necessary to have new storm drain improvements in place by October 15, 1998. The reinforced storm drain pipe will take approximately five (5) weeks to manufacture. Normally, we would have the successful low bidder order the pipe and include the costs in his bid. Due to the limited time available to complete this the storm drain system and short pipe supplies, we are recommending that the City order the storm drain pipe concurrently with advertising for construction to avoid delays. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed for the storm drain and we expect to receive authorization from the Army Corps of Engineer's to proceed shortly. This project will construct a new storm drain system on Margarita Road south of Winchester Road. The box culverts under Margarita Road and Overland Drive and an open channel south of the Mall can be constructed separately with the forthcoming street improvement projects later this summer. This project will impact Margarita Road and will include detours and temporary roadways. The estimated construction cost for this project is $425,000. The pipe purchase estimate is $125,000. The plans and specifications for this project are available for review in the City Engineer's office. r:\agdrpt\98\0728\pw97-O7.bid/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Street Improvements, Public Services, and Public Facilities. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165- 696-5804 and No. 210-165-681-5804. r:\agdrpt\98\0728\pw97-07. bid/ajp ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER ~' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Encroachment Permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conversation District for the Old Town Streetscape Project, Project No. PW97-05 PREPARED BY: 4v~'~/~/Villiam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects J/~ John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Encroachment Permit required by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conversation District in the amount of $1,150.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the permit. BACKGROUND: We had applied for an encroachment permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to install landscaping on the westside of Front Street along Murrieta Creek from Rancho California Road to Moreno Road in Old Town Temecula as part of our Old Town Streetscape Project. We received the Encroachment Permit No. 7-0-020-2290. The permit includes certain provisions and an agreement which requires the City of Temecula Mayor's signature. The agreement is hereby submitted to the City Council requesting the Mayor's signature. The permit also requires payment of an inspection fee deposit in the amount of $1,150.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Capital Improvement Project Account No. 280-199-824-5804. ATTACHMENT: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Encroachment Permit No. 7-0-020-2290. 1 R:i,4GDRP~9810728iFLDENCRO. PMT/ejp Igednesclay Jul. y 8, 199~ 1:/,Spin -- Page 2t GOUNTY OF R~VERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOO CONTROL AND WATER COHgERVATION DISTRICT Cit7 of T~,~a~ult Po~~ Box 9033 T~.~.~,lt-. CA 92589-9033 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT part of thio form PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO · . ' - '- 0~ ~ ~ f%O%%% ~ CJI~orni~ RoId to =,~.ord~. with tb~ f~Howtng dmw~-~ n~eptad by d~ City of T~ °n APtU , ' TN8 potmir is to I~ stri~dy consm~d.nd no w~xk oftrot than thin specifi~ily montJoned shove Jm autl~sd he~... Porlom~tm~ of th~ w~k 81'u!11 bo deernod to be ~ptan(~ I)y the Permittee of all tennl and ;onditions of this perrail. This pormit]v~S~Tbe voided unless work g~)erein contemplated shall have been completed belore , 10 7-175 pRI~IIvIINARY Draw~ No.is). , sMet(s) _. '~ednesday Jury 8, 1998 l:~)!:m -- Page 31 J-TL 08 'gGJ P.3 4 Iwu~-CTION Fr's:REQUIREDBYGRANTOR'-TI?,o .-~ .... ~ Dlat~iGt Id J&tm five workrag days prlo_ ........ II143 Witel' L;on~r~,mm.v,, · - .. .... ~ %, MmS~klg, Riverside County FlmJd Co~! , - ~ tit. eMimlN4 the .-.~...,.,~ mm,m am ~ co~mmmcl I~ thim permit. SmkJ/mount m to · \.. ,. ,' '. ; . \ .... me M ............ -['..-.b ..... · % ~-~ ..~'~'..1' ~. !~E OF 13GGIN#,I~., OF.__.V~?RI~_,iT~meo %hml~ii ~,.,imd~e~m tOoilidt~Ge on~!~0:n covered by thai psrfft~t. - ~mu ,wv, . ' to theSiS1 6~work. ~,ontmi a~l Wat~ Conaerv~ion Di~ict M ~ ~ve woddpg day. prim -,. . .; .. . . Weclnesday JuLy 8, 1998 l:~ln -- Page I~CROACHMm~ Pml.M1T City Of To~ec~,lJ F, an~ehtM~t l)mmit 1%1o. 7-0020-2290 Jun~ 29, 1998 City of Temec,,~' Encro-,'h,11e,,* Permit No. 7-0-020-~ Jun~ 29, 1998 · · ~ ur~uw ,,u,, y~,.-- ' · · ' {m'+;OiW mm authmized hereby...~ · .- ---,, -~- -.-' condilions of this permit, and obl _ lviaym - City of Temec-i' ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCI~. CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 "No Turn on Red 4:00 - 6:00 P.M. MON - FRI" Northbound Front Street at Rancho California Road PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING NO TURN ON RED 4:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON NORTHBOUND FRONT STREET AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BACKGROUND: The intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street is one of the City's busiest intersections. Recently, the traffic signal timing at this intersection was coordinated with the Caltrans signals at Interstate 15 interchange. Since Caltrans signals operate on a shorter cycle length, green intervals were reduced for all directions of traffic at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street. The shorter green time at this intersection requires that interruption from right-turns on red be eliminated during certain hours. Currently, there is an exclusive right-turn lane on northbound Front Street. Vehicles turning right on red from northbound Front Street to eastbound Rancho California Road, occasionally block the intersection and interfere with the flow of eastbound traffic and southbound left-turn traffic during the P.M. peak hours. In order to minimize the impact of turning right on red at this intersection, it is recommended that right-turn on red be restricted between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on northbound Front Street at Rancho California Road. On July 9, 1998, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission reviewed this item and unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing the proposed turn restriction. The Commission also directed staff to review the proposed turn restriction upon completion of Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project. R:\AGDRPT~98\0728\RCRFRONT. RED/ajP FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department Sign Account No. 001-164-602-5244. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 98- 2. Exhibit "A" - Location Diagram 2 R:\AGDRP'F~98\0728\RCRFRONT. RED/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING NO TURN ON RED 4:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON NORTHBOUND FRONT STREET AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to review and modify the official traffic control devices within the City boundaries. WHEREAS, in order to improve the traffic safety and efficiency at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street, it is necessary to restrict the right-turn on red on northbound Front Street at certain hours. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby approve restriction of right-turn on red from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on northbound Front Street at Rancho California Road. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of July, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 3 R:~AGDRF'r'~98~072~RCRFRONT.RED/ajp (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 R:\AGDRPT~98~O728\RCRFRONT. RED/ajp Rancho California Proposed "NO TURN ON RED" 4-6 P.M. MON.- FRI. CHEVRON Road UNION 76 ITEM 18 · APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC_~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager ~ July 28, 1998 Riverside County Library Contract Amendment PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Agreement to Provide Library Services (Additional Staff). Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $115,000 to fund the Temecula Library Volunteer Coordinator half-time position, and to subsidize funding to maintain the Senior Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions at the fiscal year 1997-98 level for fiscal year 1998-99. BACKGROUND: Since July 1, 1997, the Riverside County Library System (RCLS) has been operating under a contract with Library Systems and Services, Inc. This contract is administered by RCLS by breaking the County into three Service Areas. The Temecula Library is in the Mid-South Zone Service Area, and receives funding from the Temecula, Murrieta, Sun City, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, San Jacinto, Valle Vista, Idyllwild, Calimesa, and Anza regions. For the past year, the Temecula Branch Library has been open to the general public for 48 hours per week with the following positions staffed: Position Title Number of Full Time Fqluivalents Librarian 1 Reference Librarian 2 Library Associate 1 Library Assistance 2.5 Volunteer Coordinator .5 Library Page 4 Total 11 As of July 1, 1998, the City of Murrieta is no longer part of the RCLS, and the library property taxes which were generated within the Murrieta City Limit have been redirected from RCLS to the City of Murrieta. This has resulted in a revenue shortfall of approximately $320,000 per year to the Mid-South Zone. Once the City of Murrieta formally notified RCLS of Murrieta's intention to withdraw, RCLS staff researched ways to mitigate the impact of Murrieta's withdrawal on the Temecula Library. Through increases in property taxes generated in the Mid-South Zone, and the Department of Public Social Services occupation of the Library Administrative Center effective June 1, 1998, additional revenue has been identified which will reduce the financial impact on the Temecula Library from $320,000 to approximately $115,000. Based on the reduced funding, the following changes in positions would have to be implemented for the Temecula Library: Librarian full time equivalents will be reduced from 1 FTE to .75 FTE. At an annual cost of $68,999 per year, the City would fund the deficit of $17,250 to maintain the same staffing level for this position. Reference Librarian will be reduced from 2 FTE's to .25 FTE. At an annual cost of $46,584 per year, the City would fund the deficit of $81,522 to maintain the same staffing level for this position. The Volunteer Coordinator position, for which the City Council authorized funding last fiscal year. The Volunteer Coordinator has successfully utilized an average of over 500 volunteer hours per month since this position was installed in February 1998. At an annual salary of $12,000 plus an annual operating budget of $3,000, the City would fund the deficit of $15,000 to maintain the same staffing level for this position. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funding is available in Account 001-101-999-5285 to fund the $115,000 RCLS shortfall to the Temecula Library. Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement to Provide Library Services FROM :RIV COUNTY P, DMIN OFFICE ~ ~ 11~ UU~--UO--~O W~P U/.qn rrl KiV~:l~lO~ ~;Ut. IH'I'Y CUUi~!'-'L 19~8, ~7-1D8 1S:49 #~ P. 1~3/0S F~ NO, 909 9~5 6322 P. 0PJ'04 1 2 5 6 7 ]0 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 Ig 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LIBRARY SERVICES (Addition~ S~a) COUNTY OF RIVI-.!~qlDE KIVERSm£ COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM CITY OF TEMECULA WHEREAS. the County of Riverside. Iliv.~sidc County Library Systcm (~County"). and tho City of Temccuh ('City'}, nnd thc contmct~ administrator'for County, Library Systems & Scrvice~. LLC, commonly known as "LS$1" ("LSSI'*) hnv,'- entcrcd into an agreement to provide libraair services (~a~tional staff) for tbc period carling June 30. 1998 (the "Agmemcnt'~, and tttc pa~ez wisk to furtl~ amend the A§rce~:nt, to be ffffecfivc on July 1, 1998; NOW TIiEREFOKE, th= parties agrcc ~ follows: Section I. RESPONSIBILITY. OF THE PARTIES/s amaudcd to read as follows: "I. I Services Pcrfonncd by County: County shall provide two (2) Refercr~ce Librarians, and onc (1) Library Vohrtte~r Coordinator (the "Employees") for ~h¢ T~m~ula Branch for the p~tiod of July 1, 1998 to Julie 30, 1999. Employees shall be subjec! to filc supervision of LSSI, pursuant ~o the LSSI ngrmrn~t with the County. All duties and acfiviti~ of County uml~r this Agxcement shall bc subject to tho oversight of thc County I,ibrarian for Riwrsid¢ County Librdry Sys~m C'County Librarian"). 1.2 CiW Pavr0ent of Cost of F. molove~: City shall pay the ~tual salary paid to and lC3C3~, ~-IaB P, 03Y04 1 2 4 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 16 1'7 19 :2O 23 24 27 2~ bencfits paid onebehalf o~ the Employec for the term of Rlis Agtr4;mcnt, as amcndmmt/ie*an ~ount n~ to"'~xoeed B. Each and cvcry ~efercncc to "employcc" in sections 2, and 3 shall bc amendccl to read "employees". C. Section 4.2 Term is emende~ to add tire following paragraph to the cnd of the existing .~:ction: "The term of this Agreement is cx'tended, and slud! include the tlmo period fi'om July I, 1998 throu9=~ June 30, i 999. City or County luny tm'minatc this Agrcem~t, as amended, for no cause. on the giving of thirty (30) days written notice to the otl~er Do re~o~n in l'tdl force and effect. /// .1// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// All othcr terms imd'condlti~ns of the Agreeme, at sha.ll remain unchanged and sh~tll ~ROM :RIV COUNTY P,13MIN OFFICE ¢:J~9 2?5 11~F3 P. 04/04 ! 2 3 4 5 ? 10 12 14 15 17 19 20 2] 23 24 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Coua!y, City, and LSSl have ~ th~ First Amcndment to be daly axecured by Ihz parfi~ h~reto. CITY' OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: City M~-~cr C']~k~crso~.' Bo~xd of Supervis~r~- A~mst: City Cl~rk Attest; Gerald A, Mal,~ue~,, Cl~k By: Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cily Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENS' .1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 -F~N County Cour.~,fi ]~y:_ Assimmt dity Attomelt By: D~uty County Couusel LIBRARY SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, LLC By: Chrimmpher D. Trau~ By: Freak $~t, uy ITEM 19 ORDINANCE NO. 98-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENTITLED SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1, WITH WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTRE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Westside Business Centre, LLC filed Planning Application No. PA95-0130 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. The Council adopted Resolution No. 98-__ approving the Negative Declaration. Section 3. Findings. The City Council in approving the proposed Development Agreement Amendment makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The development to be carried out pursuant to the Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 90-1 is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 90-1 and the development to be carried out hereunder complies with all other applicable requirements of State law and City ordinances. Section 4. The "Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 90-1" by and between Westside Business Centre, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and the City of Temecula is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Second Amendment on behalf of the City of Temecula in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by the reference. R:ords/98-11 I Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of th is Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do he reby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of July, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of July, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS R:Ords.98-11 2 Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ITEM 20 ORDINANCE NO. 98-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT .AGREEMENT, PASEO DEL SOL BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CAL-PASEO DEL SOL, LLC, SPECIFIC PLAN 219 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0116) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds determines, and declares as follows: A. Section 65864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of development agreements, and amendments thereto, establishing and maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; B. The predecessors in interest of Cal-Paseo del Sol ("Owner"), KRDC Inc. and Mesa Homes, entered into an Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement with the City pursuant to Government Code Section 65864, et seq., recorded on February 18, 1993 as Instrument No. 62043, Official Records of Riverside County ("Development Agreement"). C. The property to which the Development Agreement applies consists of approximately 820 acres constituting the easterly and southerly portions of Paloma del Sol within Specific Plan 219 and located westerly of Butterfield Stage Road between State Highway 79 south and Pauba Road. D. Owner and City entered into an Addendum to the Development Agreement on November 18, 1997 which provides for the City to initiate an amendment to the Development Agreement to address the dedication of certain properties and public improvements to the City. E. Notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of the Development Agreement and to consider the findings under the California Environmental Quality Act that a Supplemental EIR or Subsequent EIR is not required has been duly given in the form and manner require by law for both the public hearing before the Planning Commission and the public hearing before the City Council. R:ords\98-12 1 F. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development Agreement on July 1, 1998 at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered all of the written material and oral comments presented to it on the proposed environmental findings and the proposed Development Agreement. Following said hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-024 recommending that the City Council approve the First Amendment to Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement, Pasco del Sol. G. Developer and City have determined that certain park land, greenbelts, slopes, recreational facilities and paseos which were contemplated to be dedicated to the City under the Development Agreement should be owned and maintained by the Owners and conveyed to an appropriate homeowners association as the Property develops. Under the First Amendment, the facilities described in the Development Agreement will continue to be requirements of the Development Agreement, except as such requirements may have been modified by amendments to Specific Plan No. 219 or other land use entitlements approved by the City and accepted by the Owners; however, such facilities will be owned and maintained directly by the Owners or successor homeowner associations, rather than by the City, with funding for maintenance assessed upon the homeowners of the Property. H. The Project has been the subject of extensive prior environmental review. A full and complete environmental review in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act was conducted for the adoption of Specific Plan No. 219 on September 6, 1988, and again for the approval of the original development agreement in November 7, 1988, the approval of the restated and amended Development Agreement in Janaury 12, 1993 and for the amendment of Specific Plan No. 219 on January 13, 1998. None of the conditions described in 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163, and therefore, no further environmental review is required for the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. I. The First Amendment is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan and Specific Plan No. 219. J. The First Amendment is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the remainder of the City. K. The First Amendment will not be detrimental to, and in fact enhances, the health, safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof through the implementation of the Applicable Rules. R:ords\98-12 2 Section 2. Based on the evidence in the record before it, and after careful consideration of the evidence, the City Council hereby finds and determines that neither a Subsequent EIR a Supplemental EIR, nor further environmental review is required for the Development Agreement pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163. Section 3. The "First Amendment to Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement, Pasco Del Sol" by and between the City of Temecula and Cal-Paseo del Sol, LLC, is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the First Amendment on behalf of the City of Temecula in substantially the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit A. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:ords\98-12 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No.98-12 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of July, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of July, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:ords\98-12 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JUNE 23, 1998 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:49 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Lindemans presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, and Stone. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSFNT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 11, 1998. 2. Agreement for Softball Officiating Services 2.1 Approve agreement between the City of Temecula and the Margarita Officials Association to provide City softball league officiating services. {Pulled and separately discussed; see below.) 3. Release of Landscage Bonds - Taylor Woodrow Homes/Vintage Hills Development - {Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway) 3.1 Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the remaining landscape/erosion control bonds for Tract Nos. 22916-0 and 22916-2. MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 3 (Item #2 was pulled and separately discussed. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. minutes. CSD\062398 I Consent Calendar Item No. P discussed at this time 2. Agreement for Softball Officiating Services 2.1 Approve agreement between the City of Temecula and the Margarita Officials Association to provide City softball league officiating services. Acting Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the recommendation to approve an agreement with Margarita Officials Association was based on number of officials available, years of service, and expertise in softball officiating services. MOTION: Director Comerchero moved approve Consent Calendar Item No. 2. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4. Review and Apl~roval of 1998-99 Annual Operating Budget 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 1998-99 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS General Manager Bradley presented an overview of the proposed Annual Operating Budget (of record), noting that the budget is balanced and reflects City Council direction provided at previous workshops. In response to President Stone, General Manager Bradley noted that, in light of the deregulation of the electrical system, street lighting costs may be reduced but that, at this point in time, the City intends to retain services with a major provider but that all alternative options will be explored. MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. CSD 98-14. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY S!=RVICES REPORT No comments. GENERAL MANAGIrR'S REPORT No comments. minutes. CSD\062398 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RFPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 7:56 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 14, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] minutes. CSD\062398 3 ITEM 2 APPROV/~,, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~E CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 28, 1998 Landscape Maintenance Contract with California Maintenance, Inc., for FY1998-99 Landscape PREPARED BY: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $53,014 to cover FY1998-99 contract with California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for City facilities, medians, slopes (south) and sports parks for a seven week period. Approve contract amendment in the amount of $1,171 with California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for the additional landscaped area of Presley Development (S-13) for the first seven weeks of FY1998-99. DISCUSSION: On August 12, 1997, the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors awarded a 22.5 month contract to California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for FY1997-98 and FY1998-99. Funds were authorized for expenditure at that time for FY1997-98 only. As a result, authorization for funding FY 1998-99 is needed. The TCSD also recommends adding the maintenance of the additional landscape area of the Presley Development (S-13), to the contract with California Landscape Maintenance for the remainder of the contract. The additional area (approximately 65,000 square feet, located at on Highway 79 South, between Country Glen Way and Avenida Missions) was accepted by the Board of Directors on June 16, 1998, and became part of the Presley Development Slope Area (S-13) effective July 1, 1998. On July 10, 1998 the TCSD received a letter of resignation from California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., effective August 10, 1998. The resignation letter notes paragraph 9C of the contract which states "either party may terminate this agreement for any reason, with or without cause with thirty (30) days written notice to the other party." Staff has accepted the letter of resignation and a copy is attached for your review. As a result, approval of the amendment to the contract, and authorization to expend funds is only needed for the first seven (7) weeks of fiscal year 1998-99. R:~ziglerg\agcndas\calmsig o71:194 FISCAL IMPACT: The amount needed for the remainder of the California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., contract for FY1998-99 including the additional maintenance area addressed in the amendment is $54,185. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD annual operating budget for FY1998-99 in accounts: 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 340-199-701-5414 ATTACHMENTS: Amendment 2 Letter of Resignation 1~ :~ziglerg~agendas~.~ig o~129~ AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: purposes: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for landscape maintenance services within the CITY's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). B. The Agreement was amended on January 14, 1998. Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement." The C. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Exhibit 2 to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit 2A is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement will be terminated effective August 11, 1998. R:L~rringk~agenda.rp~\ca!98 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BY: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager ATTEST: BY: Susan W.Jones, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR C~liforni~ ! ~ndsc~0e M~intenRnce. Inc. BY: NAME: TITLE: R:~nn~k~a~enda.~t\calamd.798 ATTACHMENT 'A" EXHIBIT 2A City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site # S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 Site Name Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A & B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/ 79 South, Bridlevale) Tradewinds Monthly Price $ 484.00 893.00 239.00 4,450.00 3.884.00 1.485.00 811.00 Annual Price 5,808.00 10,716.00 2,868.00 53,400.00 46,608.00 17,820.00 9.732.00 TOTAL $12,246,00 $146,952.00 Authorized Signature R:~mrringk\agenda. rpt\ca198 California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. CANOGA PARK 7755 Deering Avenue Canoga Park, CA 91304 Phone (818) 346-7543 FAX (818) 346-6752 ORANGE COUNTY 6441 Burr Road Suite 56 Irvine, CA 92720 Phone (714) 262-1025 FAX (714) 262-3423 July 1 O, 1998 City of Temecuia 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula. CA 9259O Attn: Mr. Ron Bradl~.. - CgO,. Manager M~. il~ lMrker--Dgneaor =f C,:.v~. ~_ ~ Licensecl Contractor No. 645102 A, B, C-27 TEMECULA 28441 Rancho Califomia Road Suite C Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 699-0045 FAX (909) 699-5824 RE: Agreement between The Temeeula Community Services District and California Landscape Maintenance inc. Dated June 24, 1997for Landseape Maintemmee Services Dear Sirs. Please consider this letter formal notification that we iraend ~o te. rminam titis agreement on August10, 1998. This notice is being sent as required in paragraph 9 C on Page 13 of our contract with the City of Temecula. That paragraph s~!~ "Either pa~- may termin.~!e this a~ment for ~ ~ ~& or ~out ~ ~n ~ (30) ~ ~n nofi~ m ~ o~r ~." F~I ~ to ~n~ Ron ~ or me Eyou ~ve ~y ~o~. PI~ ~ ~ ~t we ~11 ~mm in ~e~ ~ ~o i~m t~t ~e ~on is ~ ~ smoky ~ ~ble. ' ' Sincere~y,~ . California l.~,a~,~,~ Maintenance Inc. cc: Kevin Hamngton- Superintendent Ron Roberts- Mayor ITEM 3 APPRO~~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors ~l-lerman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 28, 1998 Landscape Maintenance Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape for FY 1998-99 PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve a contract amendment in the amount of 8389,157 with Excel Landscape to provide landscape maintenance services for additional landscaped areas for FY 1998-99. DISCUSSION: On June 24, 1997 the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors awarded a 24 month contract to Excel Landscape to provide landscape maintenance services for FY 1997-98 and FY 1998-99. At that time, funds were authorized for expenditure for FY 1997-98. On July 14, 1998, the Board of Directors authorized funds for expenditure under the original contract for FY 1998/99. On July 10, 1998 the TCSD received a letter of resignation from the City's other landscape maintenance contractor, California Landscape Maintenance, Inc., effective August 10, 1998. The resignation letter notes paragraph 9C of the contract which states "either party may terminate this agreement for any reason, with or without cause with thirty (30) days written notice to the other party." Staff has accepted the letter of resignation and a copy is attached for your review. Excel Landscape was the second lowest bidder for those areas currently maintained by California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. when the original bid was received in June, 1997. Excel Landscape is qualified to accept maintenance responsibilities for the additional areas being vacated by California Landscape and has performed satisfactorily under their existing contract. The TCSD recommends amending the maintenance contract with Excel Landscape to include those maintenance areas currently serviced by California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. to be effective August 11, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount needed for the contract amendment with Excel Landscape for the additional maintenance areas is 8389,157. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD annual operating budget for FY 1998-99 in accounts: 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 R:tR USEP~AGENDASIEXCELAlVlD 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 340-199-701-5414 ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Letter of Resignation from California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. R : ~R US EP ~A GENDA S IEX CELAMD California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. CANOGA PARK 7755 Deering Avenue Canoga Park, CA 91304 Phone (818) 346-7543 FAX (818) 346-6752 ORANGE COUNTY 6441 Burt Road Suite 56 Irvine, CA 92720 Phone (714) 282-1025 FAX (714) 262-3423 July 10, 1998 Cid' of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Mr. Ron BradLey. - C'.~ Manager Mr. H~man Park~- Directm. o/Co ..... Licensed Contractor No. 645102 A, B, C-27 TEMECULA 28441 Rancho California Road Suite C Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 699-0045 FAX (909) 699-5824 RE: Agreement between The Temecula Community Services District and Cah'fornia Landscape Maintenance Inc. Dated June 24, 1997for Landscape Maintenance Services' Dear Sirs. Please consider this letter formal notification that we intend to terminate this agreement on August10, 1998. This notice is being sent as required in paragraph 9 C on Page 13 of our contract with the City of Temecula. That paragraph states "Either party may terminate this agreement for any reason, with or without cause within Thirty (30) days written notice to the other party." Feel free to contact Ron Hill or me if you have any questions. Please be assured that we will cooperate in every wav to insure that the transition is handled as smoothly as possible. ' ' cranes R. Jo mso.n4 ff' - California Landscn~ Maintenance Inc. cc: Kevin Hamngton- Supenntendent Ron Roberts- Mayor The California Companies California Landscape Maintenance Inc. * Oakridge Landscape and Irrigation AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 1998 by and between the Temacula CommuniW Services District ('City') and Excel Landscape ('Contractor'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an agreement for lands. cape maintenance services within the City's green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way. ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 to the Agreement are hereby added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment 'A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement will be terminated effective July 1, 1999. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Excel Landscape Temecula Community Services District Jose Alfaro Owner Jeffrey E. Stone President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R : ~R USE P I C O NTRA CT~ ~,H) EXCEI,. WPD ATTACHMENT A R.' ~R U S E P I C O NTRA ~ EXCEL. WPD S~te~ S-3a S-3b S-4 S-8 S-12 S-13 S-16 EXHIBIT 3 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SLOPE SERVICE AREA (SOUTH) Site NRme Rancho Highlands Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope The Vineyards The Villages A & B Vintage Hills Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/ 79 South, Bridlevale) Tradewinds Monthly Price $ 515.00 1.000.00 255.00 4,734.00 4.600.00 1,408.00 863.00 TOTAL $13,375.00 Annual Price $ 6,180.00 1 ?,000.00 3,060.00 56,808.00 55,700.00 16,896.00 10,356.00 $160.500. O0 Authorized Signature R: ~RUSEPiCONTRA CT~MDEXCEL. WPD M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 EXHIBIT 4 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance MEDIANS SERVICE AREA Site Name Rancho California Road Median Ynez Road Median Butterfield Stage Road Median Margarita Road Median Monthly Price $ $ 500.00 $ lOO.OO Annual Price S S 1 TOTAL 67 Site # SP-I SP-2 SP-3 P-8 (SP-4) EXHIBIT 5 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA Site Name Rancho California Sports Park Paloma Del Sol Park Pala Community Park Kent Hintergardt Park TOTAL Monthly Price $ 9,294.00 $ 3,592.00 $ 2.333.00 $ 3,359.00 $18.578.00 Annual Price $ ]1] ,528.00 $ 42,1 f)4.('D $ 27,996.00 S $ 797,q~ O0 68 EXHIBIT 6 City of Temecula Request for Proposal Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Site Name Community Recreation Center Senior Center City Hall/Maintenance Facility Temecula Community Center Fire Station #84 Old Town Parking Lot Monthly Price $1, ~?A.00 $ 361.00 $ 541.00 $ 193.00 $ 580.00 $ 25O.00 Annual Price $17,32~.00 $ 4,332.00 $ 6,492.00 $ 2,3]6.00 S 6, q60.C~q $ 3.000.00 TOTAL 3,369.00 69 TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN. x CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors r~,~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services July 28, 1998 Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Edge Construction for $1.35 million, for the construction of Margarita Community Park. A preconstruction meeting was held on March 11, 1998, and the project is currently under construction. The Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and ballfield lighting. It is anticipated this project will be completed in the Spring, 1999. The City Council awarded a contract on October 7, 1997, to ModCraft for the ADA upgrades project and this project is currently under construction. This project provides handicap accessibility to the following park sites: John McGee Park, Calle Aragon Park, Bahia Vista Park, Rancho California Sports Park and Veteran's Park. This is project is complete. On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Terra Cal Construction for $601,000, for the construction of Winchester Creek Park. Construction is moving forward on schedule. The restroom, play structure and picnic shelter are installed. Winchester Creek Park is a 4.5 acre passive use park consisting of a tot lot, picnic facilities, an outdoor basketball court, a sand volleyball court and open turf areas. On March 17, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement and Scope of Services, in the amount of $55,000, with AMS Planning and Research, for the preparation of a ten (10) year Cultural Arts Master Plan for the City of Temecula. The first project committee meeting was held on June 16, 1998, with the consultant and members of the community. On June 17, the consultant held individual interviews with various members of the arts organizations in the community. The Cultural Arts Master Plan process will take approximately seven months. The focus group meetings and the community workshop will be held August 18 and 19, 1998. Ubrary architect interviews were held on February 9, 1998, with follow-up interviews held on February 26, 1998. Council awarded a design contract to cover site selection, programming and master planning of the site to LPA, Inc., on May 12, 1998, in the amount of $58,000. The first meeting of the Ubrary Design Project Committee was held on July 21, 1998. City Council awarded a contract to Dahl, Taylor & Associates for the design of a temperature control system at the Community Recreation Center gymnasium. Bid opening was held March 26, 1998, and the City Council awarded a contract on April 14, 1998 to 1st Mechanical. This project is currently under construction. Air conditioning units have been installed. Staff anticipates this project will be completed by mid August 1998. The Sports Park Sidewalk Project is currently in final plan check. Modifications were made to the landscaping and irrigation plans. Staff anticipates this project will be out to bid in August, 1998. The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the Temecula Valley High School Tennis Courts. The agreement will be brought forward to the Board of Education for approval in August 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting and maintenance of eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of Temecula, in exchange for the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation programming. The City of Temecula Community Services Department presented the sixth annual July 4th Parade and Fireworks Spectacular. This annual event entertained in excess of 15,000 residents from Temecula and many of the surrounding communities. Events included a parade through Old Town Temecula, a community barbeque at Rotary Park, craft faire and family entertainment at the Temecula Sports Park and a fireworks display. R:~t~GEN'DAS~st~07 July 21. 1~,8 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 23, 1998 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:56 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Lindemans presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, and Lindemans. AGENCY MEMBERS: None. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMM!=NTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 11, 1998. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. AGFNCY BUSINESS 2. Old Town Market Assessment 2.1 Review the Study and provide direction on an implementation strategy. Agency Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. Mr. Paul Marra, Keyset Marston Associates, Inc., provided a brief summary of the report including the conclusions (of record). Agency Member Roberts requested that page 6 of the report Item No. 2 Market Opportunities - Retail/Restaurant - be amended to more accurately reflect the City's desire to develop family-oriented type businesses. minutes.RDA\062398 1 Having reviewed this assessment, Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula Stage Stop, relayed the merchants' support of the assessment and reiterated the merchants' desire to rename Front Street and to develop a monument sign for Old Town. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to receive and file the report as amended by Agency Member Roberts. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained. 3. Review and Approval of 1998-99 Annual Operating Budget 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1998-99 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS Executive Director Bradley briefly reviewed the Annual Operating Budget (as per agenda material). MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to adopt Resolution No. RDA 98-10. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained. EXECUTIVF DIRFCTOR'S REPORT No comments. AG!=NCY M!=MB!=RS' REPORTS No comments. minutes. RDA\062398 2 ADJOURNMENT At 8:16 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 14, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel Lindemans, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] minutes. RDA\062398 3 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/Redevelopment Agency Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager July 28, 1998 Old Town Construction and Promotion PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appropriate $30,000 for the projects selected to augment the Old Town Streetscape project budget for mitigation of the impacts of this project on the merchants and general public. BACKGROUND: For the past few weeks, the merchants and shoppers in Old Town Temecula have been subjected to significant inconveniences due to the Rancho California Water District (RCWD) waterline construction and the beginning of the City's Old Town Streetscape project. In response to the concerns created by these two major projects, Councilmembers Lindemans & Comerchero have been working with Staff and Old Town merchants to facilitate the project by identifying major problem areas and finding solutions to difficulties caused by the construction. On Monday, July 13, 1998, Staff met with the merchants in Old Town. During this meeting and three subsequent meetings within the next week, the combined group recognized that the major issues associated with the project are advertising, moving people throughout Old Town, and making daily deliveries to the businesses during construction. In an effort to provide relief to the merchants during the four-month construction period, the following recommendations have been brought forward: Merchant meetings be held as needed from now until the Streetscape project is completed. Meetings may also extend through the holiday season. Install a billboard by August 1st so that freeway travelers will see the Old Town Temecula advertisement. Purchase a large cold-air balloon to advertise Old Town Temecula. Install signage throughout Old Town to provide information and as well as to advertise the project. Lease office space for four months to provide the merchants access to key City Staff, consultants, and contractor representatives during the construction period. Install a temporary road to provide alternative access when Front Street is closed. Ensure that Front and Main Streets are not closed at the same time. Commence a full blown promotion to include newsletters to merchants, newspaper/magazine advertising, and a hard hat give-away to tourists/shoppers (as outlined below) A budgeted amount of $113,000 was previously dedicated for Old Town advertising and promotion during the mitigation period. Please note that additional costs associated with mitigation efforts such as transportation (i.e. People Mover, trolley and delivery trucks) are not reflected in the above estimates and will be brought forward for consideration in the next City Council meeting. The estimated costs for the Streetscape Project mitigation effort are broken down as follows: ITEM ESTIMATFD COST Billboard Advertisement per year Cold Air Balloon (purchase) Temporary Access Road Additional Temporary Signage 24,000 7,000 12,000 1,500 Office in Old Town for 4 months Lease space in Rancon Building or Lease portable office space 3,500 Promotional Items Hard Hat Give-Away $1,000 give-away raffle School Educational Field Trips Placemats, napkins,buttons, stickers pencils Promotions (November-December) VIP Party 12,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 24,500 5,500 TOTAL PROMOTIONS 49,000 Advertising (August-November) Trade Publications Local Press Cinema Advertising Cable Advertising Advertising Graphics Advertising (November-December) 6,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 1,000 25,000 TOTAL ADVERTISING 46,000 TOTAL $143.000 FISCAL IMPACT: Out of the total cost of $143,000, funds in the amount of $113,000 have been appropriated for this effort. Additional funds in the amount of $30,000 are available for appropriation in the General Fund Unappropriated Reserve. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPRC~VA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR~_~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager July 28, 1998 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of July 28, 1998 for the Redevelopment Department. This report covers housing, redevelopment and economic development. HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Program Funding in the amount of $400,000 for FY 97-98 is now available. Residential Iml~rovement Programs Since the program started, twenty eight projects have been completed and 13 are in process. The majority of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement. Temecula O.N.E. Crime Free Multi-Housing Program certificates have been awarded to Rancho West, Vintage View, Morning Ridge, Summer Breeze, Creekside, Sycamore Terrace, Acacia, Rancho California and Margarita Summit Apartments. Currently, we are working with the Alcohol Beverage Control on a juvenile decoy-buy program to enhance Operation ERACIT. Once again the 3rd Annual Pujol 4th of July picnic was a success. Over 500 hamburgers and hotdogs were served. A dunk tank, jolly jump, face painting and games were enjoyed by kids and adults alike. We are currently continuing with the TAG Program. We now have fourteen trained resident volunteers for the TAG Team. R:\SYERSK\MONTHLLY~REPORT.JUL 7/22/98 k~ North Pujol Redevelol;)ment Proiect The Affirmed Housing Group of Escondido is finalizing the financing plan which includes Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Tax Credits. Plans have been submitted for Development Plan approval. The proposed project will rehabilitate the existing 38 apartment units and develop 18 new units on the vacant acre of land. In addition, Affirmed is negotiating with an adjacent property owner to enlarge the project. The additional property would yield 20 more units. OLD TOWN Old Town Streetscage Iml~rovement Projects · Construction began July 1, 1998. This project is scheduled for completion on November 15. Merchant meetings have been held Mondays at 6 p.m. at Butterfield Square in Old Town. Facade Iml~rovement Non-Conforming Sign Program The following facade improvement project is underway: · Long Branch Antiques (Formerly NAPA Auto Parts) -facade renovation The following facade improvement projects are completed: · Temecula Creek Plaza (southwest corner of Sixth and Front) -paint and minor repairs · The Bank Restaurant - paint The following facade improvement applications are being processed: · Second Street Automotive - complete facade renovation · Rancon Building - repaint trim Staff has also met with several other interested property and business owners. Old Town Temecula Market Study · The market study was presented to the Council on June 16, 1998. Copies are available free of charge at City Hall. Old Town Promotion In response to concerns from the Old Town Merchants, an Ad Hoc Old Town Promotion R:\SYERSK\MONTHLLY~REPORT.JUL 7122/98 k~ 3 Committee has been formed to assist staff in building a promotional campaign for Old Town during construction of the streetscape improvements. In addition to the Billboard, the committee is reviewing proposals for advertising in newspapers and magazines, and the purchase of a cold air balloon. The promotions are centered around the slogan 'Be part of the $5 million facelift." ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Temecula's corporate brochure is at the printers. The brochure will be ready to distribute by the end of July. Brochures will be distributed at trade shows and to prospective businesses looking to expand or relocate. The Corporate Personnel Relocation Assistance marketing insert is completed. Through the City's Housing Assistance Program, selected businesses who relocate or expand in Temecula may take advantage of financial assistance programs which provide eligible employees with deferred payment loans to assist in purchasing homes or rental assistance payments. The insert will be included in Temecula's business kit. On July 15, there was an Open House for the Winchester Ridge Business Park for their new 50,792 square foot industrial project in the Westside Business Centre. Publicity Inland Empire Economic Partnership {IEEP) is in the process of developing an aggressive print and Internet promotional campaign. The print component involves a series of advertisements designed to illustrate unity and support for the region for local business retention and expansion. The over runs of these ads will be used in IEEP's national campaigns, direct mail and tradeshows. Each of the three ads will focus on a different aspect of the business/government community. In addition to print advertising, IEEP is updating its website and Factbook. Temecula submitted material to IEEP and will be included in all of these areas. Temecula will be featured in Outlook Magazine in their special California issue. Temecula will also be placing an ad. The publication has a wide distribution including site selectors, CEO's, investors, and trade shows. Outlook sends inquiries responding to our ad and the City follows up with them. Monthly calendar of events and Old Town special events press releases continue to go out to the media. Leads and Inquiries In the month of July, we responded to 4 leads and 17 inquiries. R:\SYERSK~MONTHLLY~REPORT.JUL 7/22/98 k~ ~' Fast Track Appleton Electronics located in the Westside Business Center and will be utilizing the City's Fast Track Program. The Bostik building will consist of 140,000 sq. ft.; Phase I - 45,625 sq.ft.; Phase II - 94,375 sq. ft. They are planning to open July 1998. Four-Sher's 226,000 sq. ft. industrial office building is currently under construction. Completion date is slated for early summer '98. Speculative Building Creative Components, now located on Business Park Drive is expanding to an existing 16,656 sq. ft. speculative building on Winchester Road. Approximately 300,000 sq. ft. of speculative industrial space are in various stages of development in Temecula. Four-Sher Development is developing two speculative buildings which are planned to serve either manufacturing, distribution or assembly business users. One development includes a 38,300 sq. ft. industrial building and the second encompasses 28,700 sq. ft. both located on Business Park Drive within the Rancho California Business Park. Utilizing the City's Fast Track program, SPT Holdings currently has two 46,000 sq. ft. speculative buildings under construction in the Winchester Highlands Business Park. The developments are designed for an industrial/warehouse or office user. San Diego-based CW Assets have currently constructed five light industrial buildings using the Fast Track program. The buildings range in size from 9,490 sq. ft. up to 11,492 sq. ft. and are located in the Winchester Business Center. TOURISM Publicity Temecula's tourism newsletter, Escape to Temecula, is currently being designed and written. The newsletter highlights major tourism activities and attractions in Temecula. It is distributed to travel writers, tour operators, destination management companies hotel concierges, travel agents across the U.S., and entertainment media. Award Competition The City submitted 2 entries in the James C. Howland Awards for Urban Enrichment sponsored by the National League of Cities. The entries were for the Economic Development Strategic Plan and the Temecula O.N.E. Program. The City submitted an entry in the Helen Putnam Awards sponsored by the League of California Cities for the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\SYERSK\MONTHLLY~REPORT.JUL 7/22/98 kg~ 5 The Council for Urban Economic Development (CUED) awarded Temecula a Gold Award in their Economic Development Promotion Awards Competition sponsored by Business Facilities magazine. Temecula's Tourism Newsletter received this Promotion Award. The award is presented annually to recognize outstanding efforts and achievements in economic development, advertising, marketing and promotion. The awards presentation will take place during the Annual Conference in San Diego on September 16, 1998. Per CUED's request, staff will be putting together a brief video clip of the Tourism Newsletter program which will be shown at the conference. Cindy Ferguson of Orange County Entertainment Magazine contacted the City and Chamber for information on Temecula. Temecula will be featured in one of their upcoming issues. Barbara Barrett of South Coast Metro Magazine contacted the City for information on Temecula. Ms. Barrett is working on a story on Temecula to be included in one of their issues. KVEA -TV in Glendale contacted the City for tourism information for their station. The station highlights various 'Weekend Getaways" and wanted to showcase Temecula. The station saw printed material on Temecula in the publication 'Quick Escapes to San Diego" which was written by a travel writer who received Temecula's Tourism Newsletter. Attachments: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Report Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation Report Temecula Valley Film Council R:~SYERSK~,MONTHLLY~REPORT.JUL 7/22/98 ~, 6 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 July 8, 1998 Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula CA 92590 Dear Ron: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of June at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights · 16 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. Committee Highlights · Membership Committee's Chamber Ambassadors attended 12 ribbon cuttings. · The Tourism Committee held the first Tourism Summit Meeting in June. The goal of the Task Force is to create "group packages" that will be marketed to tour operators, trade show participants and travel writers. · Local Business Promotions Committee completed a successful month-long Shop Temecula First Campaign. · The Education Committee is planning the Bring A Book Breakfast to be held on July 18 at Oscar's. The breakfast directly benefits the Reading Buddies Program through the Temecula Unified School District. · A brief summary of positions taken since January 1, 1998 was presented to the Governmental Actions Committee. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 1,085 Travel Packets to Temecula Little League for a Little League Tournament in Temecula. · 1,000 Winery Brochures to Rosa's Cantina for distribution to visitors at the restaurant. · 300 Visitor's Guides to the Film Festival for distribution at a trade show in Los Angeles. · 140 Visitor's Guides to Windsong for visitors in Old Town. · 75 Community Recreation Center Brochures, 50 Vina De Lestonnae Retreat Brochures, 40 Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Brochures, 30 "News From the City" Brochures to the Weekend Visitor Center in Old Town. · 60 City Maps, 60 Travel Packets, 60 School Brochures, 60 Temeeula Brochures, 60 Winery Brochures to EDC for new company employees touring Temecula. · 50 City with a Vision Brochures and 50 Winery Brochures to the International Information Center in San Diego for distribution to tourists. · 40 Travel Packets, 40 Old Town Maps, 40 Visitor's Guides to an Intemet Group visiting Temecula. · 35 Old Town Maps and 35 Winery Brochures to the Optimist Club of Moreno Valley taking a tour of Temecula. Activity Report · Overall phone calls are up 61.03 percent from last year. · Overall walk-ins up by 108.21 percent from last year. Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Local Business Promotions, Tourism, Education and Governmental Action Committees. If you have any question regarding this information, please c, onta~t me at the Chamber. Executive Director CC; Mayor Ronald H. Roberts Mayor Pro Tem Steven J. Ford Councilman Jeff Comerchero Councilman Karel F. Lindemarts Councilman Jeffery E. Stone Ron Bradley, City Manager Marilyn Whisenand, Redevelopment Consultant Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER CHAMBER REFERRALS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT For June, 1998 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month Total Year-To-Date 392 64 214 875 1,545 2522 576 2837 5,998 11,059 151 50 1,548 5,642 98 9,034 1039 393 8,878 39,057 595 43,492 103 82 125 467 130 59 963 65 1,994 77 9 88 4 8 186 1,578 590 395 3,607 916 451 5,223 352 12,934 167 115 84 366 1225 732 649 2,606 GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS THIS MONTH 9,034 2,180 366 YEAR-TO-DATE 61,021 14,509 2899 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber June, 1997 Chamber June, 1998 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 568 392 -30.99 Calendar of Events 302 64 -78.81 Special Events 232 214 -7.76 * General Information NIA 875 N/A TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,102 1,545 40.20 RELOCATION 344 151 -56.10 DEMOGRAPHICS 258 50 -80.62 CHAMBER 1,738 1,548 -10.93 CHAMBER REFERRALS 1,962 5,642 N/A MISCELLANEOUS 206 98 N/A TOTAL PHONE CALLS 5,610 9,034 61.03 WALK-INS TOURISM 169 103 -39.05 * CALENDAR OF EVENTS NIA 82 N/A * SPECIAL EVENTS N/A 125 N/A * GENERAL INFORMATION N/A 467 N/A RELOCATION 207 130 -37.20 * DEMOGRAPHICS N/A 59 N/A CHAMBER 671 963 43.52 * MISCELLANEOUS N/A 65 N/A VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS N/A 186 N/A TOTAL WALK-INS 1,047 2,180 108.21 MAILINGS TOURISM 191 167 -12.57 RELOCATION 95 115 21.05 DEMOGRAPHICS 127 84 -33.86 TOTAL MAILINGS 413 366 -11.38 * Categories adjusted in 1998 to more accurately track volume. Economic Develop .m. ent Corporation Temecula Valley July 15, 1998 Temecula Redevelopment Agency City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: AgencyrrVEDC Contract - Activity Summary The following highlights the activities of the TVEDC during the month of June: Business Development: The TVEDC responded to eight inquiries from companies that retail grain products, manufacturer satellites, develop hotel/motel projects, develop and manage roller hockey rinks and provide internet accounting services as well as requests received from three site selectors. Two comprehensive packages were sent to IEEP. These proposals were requested by a furniture manufacturer and a company that rents/maintains and repairs air compressors. Responses were not sent for three proposals that required either an enterprise zone or rail service. TVEDC responded to four requests from real estate brokers for demographic and labor information packets for unidentified sources. Staff spent considerable time gathering information and arranging for an employee bus tour for a high tech molding company now located in Orange County. The tour was canceled due to a decision made by the parent company. Staff continues to work on incubator project. Marketing/Outreach Annual golf tournament was highly successful. 105 golfers attended the event which raised approximately $10,000.00 for the 'I'VEDC organization. Staff participated in a meeting with the MWD project managers for the Eastside Reservoir Recreation Project. Development of a community development center is the first step in preparation for the economic opportunities this project will bring to the area. Staff attended a second meeting for the Riverside County Welfare to Work Kiosk program. Post Office Box 1388 · Temecula. CA 92593-1388 · Office 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/695-5126 Temecula Redevelopment Agency July 15, 1998 Page Two Business Relations TVEDC staff and volunteers have visited 53 businesses to date. Business relations committee is developing target list for 1998-99. Staff has assisted in developing the collateral materials to enable the Business Relations committee to set a new goal for visitations that will be attainable. AdministrationlOmanization TVEDC held annual Board of Directors elections. Staff met with officials of Murrieta and Lake Elsinore and the County of Riverside to discuss organizational issues and review preliminary budget for sub-regional organization This concludes the written summary of activity for the month of June. (695-5130) if there are questions concerning this report. Very,Jruly/~yc!urs/:i~,,,/ ..... Judi Staats / Interim Executive Director Please call TEMECULA VALLEY · · · · FILM FE$?I¥~L July 20, 1998 Executive Director Sunny Pouison Thomas Board of Directors: President Dr. Fred Huber Vice President Bdan Padberg Secretaly Maggi Allen Chief Financial Of~cer Judy Staats Members: Sheri Davis Rod Jones Tim Miller Steve Phelps Dick Rainey Penny Rivera Mr. Ron Bradley City Manager City of Temecula Re: Monthly Update: Dear Mr. Bradley: Temecula Valley Film Council/Festiva! Acti~;,.!fies On behalf of the Temecula Valley Film Council I would like toexpress appreciation to you and the City Council for granting our 98-99 budget request. FurMraising efforts have been stepped up to comply with our new goalsl Thank you all for your vote'~ confidence. As I have done in the pastl activities are separated into two categories: Day to day film council activity and Intemational Film Festival activities. : Although we're on a fierce countdown to the festival (September: 16 20) our day to day council activities continue. FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES PROPAGANDA Productions scouted both Vail Lake and Lake Skinner for an Intel commercial. This will require permits from water districts and nearby landowners if the filming takes place at either location. Final word will come at the end of July. TVFC expended many hours on securing a 99 Chevy Truck Commercial only to lose it in the end because of Temecula's sparse hotel accommodations. Embassy Suites was booked up for the time frame required, and the Comfort Inn lacked the electronic requirements needed by the Detroit crew. Arrangements had been made with the local ranch owner and details ironed out in terms of fees, crew and technical needs, etc. The one positive aspect from all this was the employment of two Temecula residents who are working in the production and technical fields for the two week shoot. Employment is one part of TVFC's responsibility, as this situation verifies. The question always asked of potential production managers is "how can we assist you with technical and professional manpower"?, as the Temecula Valley has many highly qualified people who are in the industry. Completion of the new Temecula Inn should help alleviate some of these requirements, and TVFC looks forward to seeing more accommodations built in our area. Approximately 250 forthcoming production stats are reviewed monthly for a possible match with the Temecula Valley's amenities. "Production Weekly" is directed to us through IEFC and lists all productions in various stages of development. Follow-up call are made to the companies which could possible film in our area. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL 2774.0 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE 100 · TF.N~-CUL~ CA 92590 TEL. (909) 699-6267 FAX (909) 699-0387 Page 2 Our field of production company contacts is expanding daily. Our presence is better known within the industry, but must be promoted through all available sources. One proposal was brought before the Board of Directors for the creation of a WEBsite. More information is needed before this venture is entered into, but it's agreed that this exposure is needed. Three new members have joined our Board of Directors: Sheri Davis, Inland Empire Film Commissioner; Steve Phelps, teaching and industry related background; and Penny Rivera, SoCal Cinema Manager of both Temecula theaters. They follow the appointment made four months ago of Rod Jones, COO of North County Bank. Our attendance at SHOW BIZ EXPO was very successful. Not only did we promote the film festival and Temecula's amenities for filming, but we also marketed the Temecula area as goodwill ambassadors for the Vintner's Association and for the Chamber of Commerce for tourism. We offered small bunches of grapes for the general public as enticement to get to know more about the Temecula area. !t was a welcomed treat for the attendees as they were overloaded with sugar snacks from the other exhibitors. Additional requests were taken for our "Call for Entries" to enter a film into the festival, more than thirty requests for area information, and numerous production company heads who wished to have our Production Guide sent. On the homefront, TVFC wrapped another successful year with their involvement in their ARTS Council's ARTS IN THE COUNTRY week. As in the past, the Film Council was asked to produce The Temecula Valley Showcase. As reported in the last update, more than two hundred hopefuls were auditioned. In the end, the grand winners were judged by a panel of seven and were most deserving. This year's judges had an exceptionally difficult time as the talent was overall outstanding. TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL (TVIFF) ACTIVITIES: The Library Book Club and the University Women's Club has assisted in previewing films for acceptance into the film festival. Our Call for Entry was dispersed throughout the industry with good response to date. Our vital group of community volunteers is being assembled at this time. MOR~= AR!= NFFn~=D! Signups are encouraged by calling the Film Council at 699-6267. The mayor's next door neighbor's student granddaughter has even assisted with several days of office work. At this point the schedule of events is as follows: Wednesday, September 16: OPENING NITE: Special screening(s) and festivities Thursday, September 17: "The Schmooz" a gathering of public and filmmakers for light festivities to be held in the courtyard of Tower Center. Friday, September 18: The grand GALA at Temeku Country Club. Saturday, September 19: SATURDAY NITE BASH in the courtyard of Tower Center. Sunday, September 20: WRAP PARTY for final Viewer's Choice awards. Venue to be determined. Page 3 Screenings are to be held from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. at five of the theaters in Movie Experience 10 in the Tower Center. We're looking forward to a great many of the City's officials and employees attending our festival. We expect this year to be the best ever! Re7cffully, . TVFC WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY JULY 14, 1998 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority was called to order at 8:02 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Comerchero presiding. PRESENT: 5 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, and Comerchero. ABSENT: 0 AUTHORITY MEMBER: None. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSFNT CALFNDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 23, 1998. MOTION: Authority Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIV!= DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley advised that financing for this project is proceeding and that it should close within the next 10 days. AUTHORITY MI=MBFRS' RFPORTS No comments. Minutes. WHFA~071498 1 Temecula Winchester Hills Finencina Authoritv 071498 ADJOURNMENT At 8:03 P.M., the Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 28, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.WHFA~071498 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAT. ~/'j~ ~"'- CITY ATTORNEY ~vv, FINANCE DIRECTOR" ~ CITY MANAGER /~-~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution 98- WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Board of Directors Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 28, 1998 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 98- 1 (Winchester Hills) Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director ~--- That the Board of Directors: entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 {WINCHESTER HILLS) DISCUSSION: The Winchester Hills Financing Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the refinancing of public improvements or bonds in connection with fixed special assessment liens in the Winchester Hills area of the City. On February 24, 1998, the Authority adopted two resolutions of intention relative to a proposed community facilities district (the "District"). The resolutions of intention called for public hearings on the formation of the District, the levy of special taxes therein and the issuance of bonded indebtedness for the District. The purpose of the District is to refinance certain public infrastructure improvements in the Winchester Hills area of the City by means of the refinancing of fixed lien special assessments levied by the County of Riverside on land located within the District. Only land within the District would be subject to the levy of special taxes to repay bonds issued by the Authority to refinance the special assessments. On June 23, 1998 the Authority Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing the issuance of special tax bonds. The bonds will not be obligations of the City of Temecula, or general obligations of the District, but will be limited obligations of the District secured solely by the special taxes levied in the District, a letter of credit provided by the developer, and amounts held in a reserve fund to be established with bond proceeds. The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1998-99 fiscal year is $901,061.89 FISCAL IMPACT: The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1998-99 fiscal year is $935,061.89. All principal and interest on the bonds, as well as any administrative costs relating to the District, will be paid from the proceeds of the special tax levy. Attachments: -Special Tax Calculation Worksheet -Resolution No. WHFA 98- 2 1998-99 Budget City Of Temecula CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills) Special Tax Calculation Worksheet Bonds Outstanding $12,255,000.00 Delinquency Rate for Fiscal Year 1997-98 0.00% March '99 Interest September '99 Interest September '99 Principal Total Debt Service Reserve Fund Requirement Current Reserve Fund Balance Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve Adjustment Total Obligation $929,565.00 $929,565.00 $0.00 $0.00 $418,979.95 $418,979.95 $85,000.00 $922,959.89 $0.00 $922,959.89 Fiscal Agent Tax Consultant (Webb) Auditor -Controller Foreclosure Counsel Absorption/Disclosure City Administration Total Administration PriorYear Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Adju~ed Amoun~ $1,875.00 $1,377.00 $100.00 $0.00 $1,250.00 $7,50O.00 Current Year Levy $1,875.00 $1,377.OO $100.00 $0.00 $1,250.00 $7,500.00 $12,102.00 Total Obligation Total Administration Reserve Fund Eamings Total Requirement $922,959.89 $12,102.00 ($34,000.00) $901,061.89 Administration % of Levy Maximum Authorized Tax City's % of Levy I Tota I :Levy;!:~i:i: ::: :.?: ::~:i ::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:~:: ::i~:~::.:: :ii :: i:i::::: ii. :~i ~:.:ii:~i~111 :::i :::.i: i;i ?:::i~ ! !~i::.i::i :.i!:::.::i?: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!ii ?:!11!11111!i ii: i :.i i:~ !i!i! !i!::ii?:! i i!i!::ii!ii!i~i!iii!i !iiii!!!::i iiiiiiiiiii!?::.!i!iS 90.1 ::;06.1:~89. I FY 1997-98 Levy $0.00 Difference $901,061.89 1.34% 0.83% 100.00% RESOLUTION NO. WHFA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACHJTIES DISTRICT NO. 98-1 (WINCHESTER HILLS) WHEREAS, the Winchester Hills Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills), created pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. WHFA 98-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD; and WHF~REAS, the Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Winchester Hills Financing Authority, acting as the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills) as follows: Section 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct. Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. WHFA 98-11 and Ordinance No. WHFA 98-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $901,061.89 on the parcels which comprise the CFD for Fiscal Year 1998-99 as set forth on a magnetic tape to be provided by Albert A. Webb Associates to the Auditor-Controller of the County. Section 3. The special tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Ordinance No. WHFA 98-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 4. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: Ao Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. WHFA 98-11 and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 5. The Auditor-Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 6. The County Auditor-Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor-Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 4. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Winchester Hills Financing Authority at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary ITEM 21 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI NA,~,~N' CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director July 28, 1998 Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre-Zoning and Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas) Annexation of the PREPARED BY: John De Gange, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: ADOPT the Negative Declaration with a Finding of DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre-Zoning and Annexation); ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre- Zoning and Annexation); and 3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, PRE- ZONING THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS ESTABLISHING ZONING FOR THESE AREAS AS "SPECIFIC PLAN" AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 AND SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT "B" 4. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS REORGANIZING THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND SAID AREAS TO INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TO DETACH SAID TERRITORY FROM CSA 143, CSA 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATED AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 R:\STA FFRIrI'\205PA98.CC 7/21/98 jd 1 BACKGROUND This item comes before the City Council after 121 residents within the Redhawk area submitted a petition to the City in January of 1997 requesting that the City annex them. To determine the feasibility of the annexation staff conducted a survey of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch residents to determine if they would be in favor of annexation. In addition, staff conducted a comprehensive study of the fiscal impacts associated with the annexation. After considering all these items, the City Council, at its April 28, 1998 meeting instructed staff to proceed with the annexation. At this time, staff is coming forward with the first formal step in the annexation process. The actions being requested in this application include the approval of a Negative Declaration for the project, the adoption of a Resolution initiating the Commencement of Proceedings, and an Ordinance pre-zoning the territory. Following these actions, an application will be made to, and a hearing will be held by, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). It is the City's hope that this item will be heard at LAFCO at its October 22, 1998 meeting. If approved by LAFCO, the City Council is then required to act as the Conducting Authority and hold a public hearing to evaluate any protests from the residents or property owners in the annexation area. The annexation will become final only with the successful election of special rates and charges for park, slope and median maintenance and refuse collection by two thirds of the registered voters within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch area who vote in the election. The Planning Commission considered this proposal on July 1, 1998. The Commission unanimously recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council adopt a Resolution initiating annexation proceedings and an Ordinance pre-zoning the territory with "Specific Plan" zoning. Discussion at Planning Commission At the July 1, Planning Commission meeting, though there was unanimous support for the annexation, there were two issues which generated some discussion. The first of these issues was a concern that, because Redhawk and Vail Ranch are two distinct areas, one or the other area could defeat the annexation for the other area by the residents of that area voting down the special tax and rates and charges component of the annexation. The Commission asked staff if the areas could be separately considered so that the vote for one area would not defeat annexation for the entire area. Staff informed the Commission that all the fiscal impact studies which had been conducted considered both areas as one unit and in order to consider the areas separately, the fiscal impacts of each area would have to be evaluated separately. In addition, staff informed the Commission that LAFCO would likely not look favorably on an annexation which involved the Redhawk area only, given that annexation of Redhawk by itself would create an island of unincorporated territory. Annexation of Vail Ranch by itself could potentially be considered; however, at this time, a new application would be required. A new application would involve the preparation of a new fiscal impact analysis and plan for services, a new map and legal description, and the adoption of a new resolution of application initiating annexation proceedings and, the pre-zoning ordinance. The second issue raised by the Planning Commission had to do with the provision of fire services. It was suggested by Commissioner Slaven that additional fire personnel may be required after annexation, given the fact that the City provides one additional staff person per piece of fire fighting equipment (truck or engine) than the County provides. The concern was that when Redhawk/Vail Ranch annexes; the City, pursuant to its contract with the County, R:\STAFFRPT\205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd 2 would be required to provide an additional person to meet the City's staffing requirement. Currently the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area is serviced by Station 84 which is located at 30650 Pauba Road. Upon annexation into the City this station will continue service the area. Since Station 84 is already within the City limits and is staffed by the extra person per vehicle required per the City contract, no additional personnel would be required. At this time, if a fire occurs in the area within the Station 84 service area, regardless of whether it is in the City or in an unincorporated area in the County, the equipment responding to the fire will be staffed with the number of personnel required by the City's contract. Consequently, if the area is annexed, there will virtually be no change in the fire protection services provided to the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area. The Commission also questioned whether the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area falls within the threshold for adequate response time for Station 84. Areas within the City limits and the surrounding developed areas of the County fall within Urban Category 2. The established standard for response time is within five minutes. Currently the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area falls within the zone of five minute response time. This will remain unchanged if the area is annexed. As building continues in the area and the density increases the response time will increase. As a consequence, construction of a new fire station within close proximity of the annexation area either to located at Butterfield Stage Road, south of Highway 79 or near the vicinity of Wolf Valley Road and Pala Road is proposed, pursuant to the conditions of approval for the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. Ultimately, this station will service the area. It is anticipated that this station will be constructed in fiscal year 2000/2001. Correspondence (Letters Received) Just prior to their July 1, 1998 meeting, the Planning Commission received a letter from the attorney representing the owners of the commercial property in Vail Ranch along the south side of Highway 79 (S) [MDC Vail], dated June 25, 1998 (see Attachment 6). This letter expressed a series of concerns and generally indicated that this property owner would be opposed to annexation to the City. Since the July 1st Planning Commission meeting, staff has met with the representatives of this property (Jerry Swanger and Sam Alhadeff) to discuss their concerns. At this time, it is staff's feeling that many of their concerns have been addressed. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact associated with the annexation of the Redhawk/Vail Ranch areas is fully addressed in the fiscal impact analysis conducted by the City and included herein as Attachment 5. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated to less than significant level. In addition this project by itself will not impact endangered, threatened or rare species, or the site will not serve as a migration corridor. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Negative Declaration for PA 98-0205 be adopted for this project and a Finding of DeMiminimus impact be made. R:\STAFFRPT~205PA9g.CC 7120198 jd 3 SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS This project consists of the pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the incorporated City of Temecula. The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the existing City limits and is entirely contained within the City's Sphere of Influence. This annexation will not create any islands or pockets of unincorporated territory. The proposed actions to be taken fulfill the City's requirement for application to LAFCO which include adopting a resolution of application initiating annexation proceedings and pre-zoning the site. The proposed zoning, "Specific Plan", is consistent with the zoning which currently exists in the County and what has been designated by the City's General Plan. Zoning on the property would take effect once the annexation is finaled. FINDINGS Annexation 1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Specifically, police services is an area which has been identified as an area which will be affected by annexation. After Mitigation Measures are incorporated, impacts to Police Services will be e considered less than significant. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. The proposed annexation area is entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous the City's corporate boundary. The area is substantially surrounded by the City's existing corporate boundary. The territory within the proposed annexation area is within a substantially developed area which is continuing to develop. The proposed annexation area is not prime agricultural land (as defined by Section 56064 of the Government Code), and is designated for urban growth by the City of Temecula's General Plan. 6. The project will have a positive fiscal impact on the City budget. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. R: \STAFFRP"~205 PA98 .CC 7120195jd 4 Said findings are supported by the Staff Report analysis, maps, exhibits, attachments and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. Pre-7oning The proposed Pre-Zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts to the environment will result from the establishment of zoning for this property. Impacts from future development can be mitigated to a level less than significant. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. The proposed Pre-Zoning is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. The designations established by the General Plan reflect the zoning designations within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. The site of the proposed Pre-Zoning is suitable to accommodate all the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the site is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. Adequate access exists to the proposed site of the Pre-Zoning. Access to the project is currently being provided at Highway 79 (S) from Redhawk Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road, and Pala Road at Wolf Valley Road. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. R:\STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7/20/95 jd 5 Attachments: City Council Ordinance No. 98- (Planning Application No. PA98-0205, An Ordinance Pre-Zoning the Proposed Annexation Area With the Zoning Designation "Specific Plan" - Page 7 Exhibit "A" - Zoning Map City Council Resolution No. 98- A Resolution of Application Initiating Annexation Proceedings - Page 12 Exhibit "B" - Map and Legal Description - Distributed under separate cover July 1, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 18 Plan for Provision of Municipal Services for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 - Annexation of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas - Page 19 Fiscal Impact Analysis for the Annexation of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas - Page 20 Correspondence from Lorenz Alhadeff Cannon & Rose, LLP dated June 25, 1998 - Page 21 R:\STAFFRPT\205PA95.CC 7/20/98 jd 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO, 98- PRE-ZONING ORDINANCE R:\STAFFRP15205PA98.CC 7/20198 jd 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, PRE-ZONING THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLANS AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 ESTABLISHING ZONING FOR THIS AREA AS "SPECIFIC PLAN" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT B. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning classification shown on the attached exhibit (Exhibit B) is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zoning designation "Specific Plan" as described in this Ordinance and Planning Application 98-0205 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. Findings. A. The City Council in adopting said ordinance, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed Pre-Zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts to the environment will result from the establishment of zoning for this property. Impacts from future development can be mitigated to a level less than significant. 2. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. R:\STAFFRIrr\205PA98.CC 7/21/98 jd 8 3. The proposed Pre-Zoning is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. The designations established by the General Plan reflect the zoning designations within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. 4. The site of the proposed Pre-Zoning is suitable to accommodate all the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the site is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. 5. Adequate access exists to the proposed site of the Pre-Zoning. Access to the project is currently being provided at Highway 79 (S) from Redhawk Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road, and Pala Road at Wolf Valley Road. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. Section 3. The City Council in approving the certification of the Negative Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Pre-Zoning will have a DeMinimis impact on fish and wildlife resources. The City Council specifically finds that in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potential adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. This is based on the fact that this action will not change any of the development activities that have previously been constructed or are currently under construction. Furthermore, the City Council finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by the Planning Commission which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the City Council's determination, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this Di minimis finding is made. In addition, the City Council finds that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources, or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Finally, the City Council finds that the City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5 (d). Section 4. The areas identified in Exhibit "B" are hereby pre-zoned Specific Plan (SP) [the Redhawk Specific Plan Area will be designated "SP 9" and the Vail Ranch Specific Plan area will be designated "SP 10"] to become effective upon annexation to the City of Temecula. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STAFFRPT\205PA98.CC 7/21/98 jd 9 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of ,1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\STAFFRFl'~205PA95.CC 7/20/98 jd '[ 0 EXHIBIT A ZONING MAP R:\STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7/20198 jd 1 CITY OF TEMECULA Ranch Spec SP 10 'Specific Plan" Zoning - SP 9 "Specific Plan" Zoning - SP 10 CASE NO. - PA98-0205 EXHIBIT - B ZONING MAP R:\STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS R:\STAFFRPT~205PA95.CC 7/20/98 jd 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS REORGANIZING THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIFS OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIRED HEREIN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND SAID AREAS TO INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TO DETACH SAID TERRITORY FROM CSA 143, CSA 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATED AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to request the commencement of proceedings reorganizing the jurisdictional boundaries of certain inhabited territory described herein and known as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas to include said territory within the corporate boundaries of the City of Temecula and within the Temecula Community Services District and to detach said territory from County Service Area 143 and County Service Area 152 and the Riverside County Waste Management District pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted a General Plan for the City of Temecula and whereas the analysis within the General Plan includes said areas; WI-W~REAS, said areas are entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and are contiguous to the existing City boundary; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0205 which proposed the reorganization was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed adoption of this Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library - Rancho California Branch, the United States Post Office - Temecula Branch, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, was published in the Californian, and was mailed to the Local Agency Formation Commission and to each interested and each subject agency; WI~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0205, on July 1, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff R:\STAFFRPT\205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd 'l 3 and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205; WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0205, on July 28, 1998, at a duly noticed public heating as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved Planning Application No. PA98-0205; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. That the City Council hereby requests the commencement of proceedings be taken pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the California Government Code to reorganize the jurisdictional boundaries of certain inhabited territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, and known as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas, to include said territory within the corporate boundaries of the City of Temecula and within the Temecula Community Services District and to detach said territory from County Service Area 143 and County Service Area 152 and from the Riverside County Waste Management District. Section 3. That the City Council requests that the proposed reorganization be subject to the condition that the residents of said territory approve a special tax and rates and charges to finance the cost of providing services to the territory. Section 4. Findings. That the City Council, in adopting a Resolution requesting the commencement of proceedings to reorganize the jurisdictional boundaries of the territory herein referred to as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas to include said territory within the corporate boundaries of the City of Temecula and within the Temecula Community Services District; and the detachment of said territory from County Service Areas (CSA) 143 and 152, and the Riverside County Waste Management District (approving Planning Application No. PA98- 0205), hereby makes the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. R: [STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7120198 jd ] 4 2. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Specifically, police services is an area which has been identified as an area which will be affected by annexation. After mitigation measures are incorporated, impacts to police services will be considered less than significant. 3. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not ser,,'e as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. 4. The proposed annexation area is entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous to the City's corporate boundary. The area is substantially surrounded by the City's existing corporate boundary. 5. The territory within the proposed annexation area is within a substantially developed area which is continuing to develop. The proposed annexation area is not prime agricultural land (as defined by Section 56064 of the Government Code), and is designated for urban growth by the City of Temecula's General Plan. 6. The project is being proposed on behalf of certain residents within the subject territory in order that the City may provide community services to the residents of said territory in a more responsive and efficient manner. 7. The project will have a positive fiscal impact on the City budget. 8. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. 9. Said findings are supported by the Staff Report analysis, maps, exhibits, attachments and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. Section 5. Environmental Compliance. The City Council in approving the certification of the Negative Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Pre-Zoning will have a DeMinimis impact on fish and wildlife resources. The City Council specifically finds that in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potential adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. This is based on the fact that this action will not change any of the development activities that have previously been constructed or are currently under construction. Furthermore, the City Council finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by R:\STAFFRPT\205PA98.CC 7/21/98 jd '] 5 the Planning Commission which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the City Council's determination, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this Di minimis finding is made. In addition, the City Council finds that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources, or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Finally, the City Council finds that the City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula ~ day of ,1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 1998, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT\205PA98.CC 7/21/98 jd 16 EXHIBIT B MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER R:\STAFFRPT~20t~PA98.CC ?/20/95 jd 1 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING C0MMISSlON STAFF REPORT JULY 1, 1998 R:~STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7~20~98 jd '1 8 STAFF REPORT o PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July 1, 1998 Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre-Zoning and Annexation) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner John De Gange, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: RFCOMMFND the City Council Adopt the Negative Declaration with a Finding of DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre-Zoning and Annexation); RFCOMM!=Nn the City Council Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98- 0205 (Pre-Zoning and Annexation); and ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Pre-Zoning) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: City of Temecula REPRESENTATIVE: N/A PROPOSAL: The pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the incorporated City of Temecula. LOCATION: Generally located within the City's southern Sphere of Influence (known as Vail Ranch Specific Plan and Redhawk Specific Plan), south of SR79 South, east of Murdy Ranch (east of Pala Road), north and west of Anza Road. EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan No. 217 (Redhawk) and Specific Plan No. 223 (Vail Ranch). R:~TAFFRPT~OSpA91t.I~CI 6/24/98 kJb I SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: City - Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Area County- Pechanga Indian Reservation City - Murdy Ranch Specific Plan Area County -Pechanga Indian Reservation, A-1- 10, A-1-20; City - NC (Neighborhood Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: Specific Plan No. SP-9 (Redhawk) and Specific Plan No. SP-10 (Vail Ranch). GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Multiple: (HTC Highway Tourist Commercial), (BP Business Park), (OS- Open Space/Recreation), (NC Neighborhood Commercial), (L- Low Density Residential), (LM Low-Medium Density Residential), (M - Medium Density Residential), (H - High Density. EXISTING LAND USE: Single-family residential, commercial, golf-course, parks and vacant. SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Lucky's commercial center, vacant/under construction single-family residential homes (Paloma del Sol Specific Plan) Vacant Vacant, dispersed low density single-family residential housing Vail Ranch Commercial Center, single-family residential housing, vacant PROJECT STATISTICS The land use break downs for the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans are in the following table: Acres Total 'Dwelling Units :Single-Family Residential [Detached] {acres/units) Single-Family :Residential :[Attached] (acres/units) · Multi-Family Residential : :(acres/units) Parks (ecres) Schools (acres) Redhawk Vail Ranch TOTAL Specific Plan Specific Plan 1275 720 1995 4188 2431 6619 533 (2222 units) 245 (1234 units) 778 (3456 units) 120 (667 units) 121 (1299 units) 127 (673 units) 32 (524 units) 247 (1340 units) 153 (1823 units) 46 102.1 148.1 32 (3 Schools) 30 (2 Schools) 62 (5 Schools) R:~STAFFRPT~05PA95.PC] 6/24/98 kfo 2 Redhawk V~il 'Ranch 'Specific Plan Specific Plan Commercial (acres) 28 126 :'Major Streets(acres) 63 48 'Open Space {.cres) 149 11.5 Golf Course (acres) 183 DENSITY 3.3 3.4 TOTAL 154 111 161 183 Source: Redhawk Specific Plan, Vail Ranch Specific Plan BACKGROUND In January of 1997, 121 residents within the Redhawk area submitted a petition to the City requesting that the City consider annexing their area. On June 10, 1997 the City Council instructed staff to study the feasibility of annexing the Redhawk and Vail Ranch areas by conducting a fiscal impact analysis and a survey of the residents in the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas to determine if the residents are in favor of annexation. On October, 7, 1997 staff presented the results of the survey and informed the City Council that additional information was required to complete the fiscal impact analysis. On April 28, 1998, following the presentation of the results of the fiscal impact analysis to the City Council, staff was instructed to proceed with annexation. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal involves the pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas. The City is proposing to pre-zone the territory with Specific Plan zoning, and utilizing the zoning which has been established by each of the specific plans. The proposed annexation will reorganize the City of Temecula's jurisdictional boundary to include unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the City's incorporated limits. ANALYSIS The proposed actions to be taken by the Planning Commission and City Council are the first step in the annexation process. Following this first step, which involves the City Council's approval of a Negative Declaration for the project, and the adoption of the Resolution initiating the Commencement of Proceedings and the Ordinance pre-zoning the territory; an application will be made and a hearing will be held by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). If approved by LAFCO, the City Council as the Conducting Authority, will hold a public hearing to evaluate any protests from the residents or property owners in the annexation area. The annexation will become final only with the successful election of special rates and charges for park, slope and median maintenance and refuse collection by 2/3's of the registered voters within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch area who vote in the election. R:~'TAFFRPT~05PA95.PC] 6/24/98 kJb 3 The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the existing City limits and is entirely contained within the City's Sphere of Influence. This annexation will not create any islands or pockets of unincorporated territory. '~he City is required to pre-zone the site prior to submitting an application for annexation to LAFCO. The proposed zoning is consistent with the zoning which currently exists in the County and what has been designated by the City's General Plan. Zoning on the property would take effect once the annexation is finaled. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The City of Temecuia has placed a number of General Plan Land Use designations on the territory contained in the annexation area. These designations directly correspond to the zoning designations contained within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans and include the following: High (H), Medium (M), Low Medium (LM), Low (L), Very Low (VL) density residential; Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Business Park (BP), Open Space (OS), and Public/institutional (P). The zoning for the site as it currently exists in the County, is Specific Plan. When annexed to the City, the land use for the project area will be with the General Plan. The zoning will be established as Specific Plan with the City Council's adoption of the Ordinance for pre-zoning which is being processed concurrently with the annexation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated to less than significant level. SUMMARYICONCLUSIONS This project consists of the pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the incorporated City of Temecula. The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the existing City limits and is entirely contained within the City's Sphere of Influence. This annexation will not create any islands or pockets of unincorporated territory. The City of Temecula has placed a number of General Plan Land Use designations on the territory contained in the annexation area. These designations directly correspond to the zoning designations contained within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. When annexed to the City, the land use for the project area will be with the General Plan. The zoning will be established as Specific Plan with the City Council's adoption of the Ordinance for pre-zoning which is being processed concurrently with the annexation. The areas to be annexed have existing entitlements (approved Specific Plans, Development Agreements, Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Tentative Tract Maps, Development Plans, Conditional R:~,STAFFRf'T~205PA98.1~I 5/24198 klb 4 Use Permits, etc.) and portions have been either constructed or are under construction. The validity of these approvals are not being affected by the annexation. An initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated. FINDINGS Annexation 1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Specifically, police services is an area which has been identified as an area which will be affected by annexation. After Mitigation Measures are incorporated, impacts to Police Services will be e considered less than significant. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. The proposed annexation area is entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous the City's corporate boundary. The area is substantially surrounded by the City's existing corporate boundary. The territory within the proposed annexation area is within a substantially developed area and which is continuing to develop. The proposed annexation area is not prime agricultural land (as defined by Section 56064 of the Government Code), and is designated for urban growth by the City of Temecula's General Plan. 6. The project will have a positive fiscal impact on the City budget. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. Said findings are supported by the Staff Report analysis, maps, exhibits, attachments and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. R:~STA~"RJrI'~05PA95.!N~I 6/24/98 klb 5 Pre-7oning The proposed Pre-Zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts to the environment will result from the establishment of zoning for this property. impacts from future development can be mitigated to a level less than significant. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. The proposed Pre-Zoning is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. The designations established by the General Plan reflect the zoning designations within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. The site of the proposed Pre-Zoning is suitable to accommodate all the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the site is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. Adequate access exists to the proposed site of the Pre-Zoning. Access to the project is currently being provided at Highway 79 (S) from Redhawk Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road, and Pala Road at Wolf Valley Road. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. Attachments: 3. 4. 5. o PC Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 7 A. City Council Resolution No. 98- (Commencement Proceedings) - Blue Page 12 B. Ordinance No. 98- - Blue Page 16 Initial Study - Blue Page 20 Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 36 Plan for the Provision of Municipal Services 38 Exhibits - Blue Page 45 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C Zoning Map Correspondence Received - Blue Page 46 R:\$TAFFRPT~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 ~ 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98 - R:~STAFFRPI'~PA9g.PCI 6/24/98 klb 7 A'I'rACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE COMMIe~NCEMENT OF PROCEEI~INGS TO ANNEX TO THE crrY OF TEMECULA CERTAIN INHABITEI~ TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE R~r~HAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE PRE-ZONING THE SAID TERRITORY WITH SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING (PA98-0205) WltEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0205 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0205, on July 1, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council give its consent to the commencement of annexation proceedings WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:~VrAFFRPT~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb 8 Section 2. Findings. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205, makes the following findings for annexation: 1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. 2. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Specifically, police services is an area which has been identified as an area which will be affected by annexation. After mitigation measures are incorporated, impacts to police services will be considered less than significant. 3. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. 4.The proposed annexation area is entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous the City's corporate boundary. The area is substantially surrounded by the City's existing corporate boundary. 5. The territory within the proposed annexation area 'is within a substantially developed area and which is continuing to develop. The proposed annexation area is not prime agricultural land (as defined by Section 56064 of the Government Code), and is designated for urban growth by the City of Temecula's General Plan. 6. The project will have a positive fiscal impact on the City budget. 7. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. 8. Said findings are supported by the Staff Report analysis, maps, exhibits, attachments and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205, makes the following findings for pre-zoning: R:\STAFFRP'FO.05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb 9 1. The proposed Pre-Zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts to the environment will result from the establishment of zoning for this property. Impacts from future development can be mitigated to a level less than significant. 2. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. 3. The proposed Pre-Zoning is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. The designations established by the General Plan reflect the zoning designations within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. 4. The site of the proposed Pre-Zoning is suitable to accommodate all the land uses currently permiRed in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the site is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. 5. Adequate access exists to the proposed site of the Pre-Zoning. Access to the project is currently being provided at Highway 79 (S) from Redhawk Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road, and Pala Road at Wolf Valley Road. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. Section 3. F. nvironmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND: THAT 1) THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS (PA98-0205),' SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A, AND THAT 2) THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVlY_~2ULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY TO PRE-ZONE THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLANS AS PART OF PA98-0205 ESTABLISHING THE ZONING FOR THIS R:'6'TAFFR.PT~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb 10 AREA AS $PECWIC PLAN" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM A~ACHED TO TFilK RF_.~OLUTION AS EXHIBIT B. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1998. Marcia Slaven, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of July, 1998, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~qTAFFRPT~05PA95.PC! 6/24/95 lifo EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98 - R:~TAFFRP~2(~PAg~.PCI 6~24/95 klb 12 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTAIN INHABFFED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE R£1~HAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS AND DESIGNATEF~ AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 WI~AS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan and whereas the analysis within the General Plan includes said annexation; WHEREAS, the said annexation area is entirely with the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous to the existing City boundary; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0205 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0205, on July 1, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0205; WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0205, on , at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved Planning Application No. PA98-0205; WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to give its consent to the commencement of annexation proceedings; R:~STAFFRPT~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 kJb '[ 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF ~A CITY COUNCIL DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findirlgs. That the Temecula City Council, in adopting a Resolution consenting to the commencement of proceedings to annex territory herein referred to as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas (approving Planning Application No. PA98-0205), hereby makes the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. 2. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Specifically, police services is an area which has been identified as an area which will be affected by annexation. After mitigation measures are incorporated, impacts to police services will be considered less than significant. 3. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. 4. The proposed annexation area is entirely within the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and is contiguous to the City's corporate boundary. The area is substantially surrounded by the City's existing corporate boundary. 5. The territory within the proposed annexation area is within a substantially developed area and which is continuing to develop. The proposed annexation area is not prime agricultural land (as defined by Section 56064 of the Government Code), and is designated for urban growth by the City of Temecula's General Plan. 6. The project will have a positive fiscal impact on the City budget. 7. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. 8. Said findings are supported by the Staff Report analysis, maps, exhibits, attachments and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. R:~STAFFP. PT~05PA95.PCI 6/24/98 klb 1 4 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. this PASSED, APPROVED, AND AI)O~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula ~ day of ,199_. AT'rEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:~TAFFRPT~205PA95.PCI 6/24/98 klb '[ ~ ANNEXATION EXHIBIT PROPOSED REDHA WK /VAIL' RANCH ANNEXATiON AREA City of Temecula CiTY 01~ 'TEMEC*,JLA SPHERE CF :~FL'JENC. 2 EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:~STAPPRFI~0~ISA98.IsC1 6/24/98 J~b 1 6 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF, CULA, CALIFORNIA, A.MF~NDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY TO PRE-ZONE THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE R~r)HAWK AND VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLANS AS PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 ESTABLISHING THE ZONING FOR THIS AREA AS SPECIFIC PLAN THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT B. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TF_2dECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning classification shown on the attached exhibit (Exhibit B) is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official l~nd Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zoning designation "Specific Plan" as described in this Ordinance and Planning Application 98-0205 and in the above rifle, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. Norice of Adoption. within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. Section 4. The City Council in approving the certification of the Negative Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Ire-Zoning will have a di minimis impact on fish and wildlife resources. The City Council specifically finds that in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potential adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. This is based on the fact that this action will not change any of the development activities that have previously been constructed or are currently under construction. Furthermore, the City Council finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by the Planning Commission which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the City Council's determination, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this di minimis finding is made. In addition, the City Council finds that there is no evidence before the City that the R:\STAFFRl:rI~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb '~ 7 proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources, or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Finally, the City Council finds that the City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoptionof this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. Findirlgs. A. The City Council in adopting said ordinance, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed Pre-Zoning will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts to the environment will result from the establishment of zoning for this property. Impacts from future development can be mitigated to a level less than significant. 2. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. There are none of the standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site. The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project. 3. The proposed Pre-Zoning is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan. The designations established by the General Plan reflect the zoning designations within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. 4. The site of the proposed Pre-Zoning is suitable to accommodate all the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the site is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. 5. Adequate access exists to the proposed site of the Pre-Zoning. Access to the project is currently being provided at Highway 79 (S) from Redhawk Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road, and Pala Road at Wolf Valley Road. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. R:~STAFFRPT's205PA98.PCI 6/24198 klb ~ 8 Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1998. day of , Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula,-California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ,199_, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:kqTAFFRPT~205PA95.I~21 6/24/98 10b '[ 9 PRE-ZONING EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 'B' ~...._j Area to be Pro-Zoned Specific Plen ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:~ST~05PA98.PCI 6/24,'98 klb 20 CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist 1. Project Title: 7. Zoning: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: Description of Project: Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Annexation - Redhawk and Vail Ranch) City of Tamecula P.O. Box 9033, Ternecula, CA 92589-9033 John DeOange, Project Planner Located within the City's southern Sphere of Influence (Iraown as Vail Ranch Specific Plan and Redhawk Specific Plan), south of SR79 South, east of Murdy Ranch (east of Pala Road), north and west of Anza Road Same as No. 2 Multiple: (HTC - Highway Tourist Commercial), (BP - Business Park), (OS- Open Space/Recreation), (NC - Neighborhood Commercial), (L - Low Density Residential), (LM Low-Medium Density Residential), (M - Medium Density Residential), (H - High Densit5, Residential) and (P- Public/Institutional Facilities) SP ( Specific Plan No. 217 - Reclhawk and Specific Plan No. 223 - Vail Ranch) The pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the mcorporated City of Temecula. The areas to be annexed have existing entitlements (approved Specific Plans, Development Agreements, Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Tentative Tract Maps, Development Plans, Conditional Use Permits, etc.) and portions have been either constructed or are under construction. The approvals are not being affected by the annexation. This project is a boundary shift between two local jurisdictions which will result in the m-assigning of responsibility for service provision to the area from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula. Police, Parks R:~-'TAFFRPT~05PA98.PC1 6/24/98 klb 21 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Other public agencies whose approval is required: and Recreafitm and City of Temecula Governmental Services are the specific a~as which have been identified to bc affected by the annexation. These affects have been determined to be less than significant. North: Vacant (Paloma dcl Sol Specific Plan No. SP-4), vacant (d~igtated NC - Neighborhood Commercial on the City ofTemocula ~ Plan Land Use Plan) and vacant (designated C-P-S, A-I-10 and R-R on the Southwest Area Commumty Plan). South: Vacant, agricultural areas and large lot single-family residences. East: Vacant and large lot single-family residences. West: Vacant (Murdy Ranch), single-family residences and commercial. Riverside LAFCO R:\STAFFRPT~05PA95.PC1 6/24/98 klb 22 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors choked below would bc pomntially aff~ed by this project, revolving at lcast one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hs~,srds [ ] Population and Housing [ ] Nois~ [ ] G~logic Problems [X] Public Services [ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signature Printed Name Date R:~TAFFRIVI'~0.$PA98.1K~I 6f'24/95 klb 23 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING IN]:ORMATION SOURCES 1. 1.AND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b. Conflict with applicable environmental plnns or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c. Be incompatible with existing land us~ in the vicinity? d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land us~)? ¢. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangeraent of an established community (including low-income or mmonty community)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving? a. Fault rapture? b. Seismic ground shaking? c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcame hazard? e. Landslides or mudflows? f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or ffil? g. Subsidence of the land? h. Expansive soils? I. Unique geologic or physical features? WATER. Would the proposal t~sult in: a.Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the rate and mount of surface runoff'/ [1 [] [] [] [] £] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] I'] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [1 [] [] [3 [] [] [] Cx] Ix] IX] IX] Ix] IX] IX] [::q Ix] IX] £x] Ix] Ix] Ix] IX] R:~STAFFRFI~05PA9S.PCI 6/24/9~ klb 24 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES o b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d. Changes m the mount of surface water in any water body? e. Changes m currents, or the course or direction of water mov~tllL~l~ .9 f. Change m the quantity of ground waters, either through dtrect additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h. Impacts to groundwater quality? I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d. Create objectionable odors? TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous totersection or incompatible uses)? Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? Insufficient par'king capacity on-site or off-site? Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [] [] [3 [3 [] [3 [] [] [] [] [] [] [3 [] [] [] [] [1 [] [1 [1 [:<3 IX3 IX3 [X'l IX3 [x] IX3 [x] [x] [xq [xq [xq [xq [xq R:'~FAFFRPT~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 Idb 25 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES NO f Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)7 [ ] g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic hnpacts? [ ] ?. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? [ ] b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? [ ] c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? [ ] d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? [ ] e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [ ] 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [ ] b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? [ ] c. Result in the loss ofavailabiliF of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? [ ] 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? [ ] b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [ ] e. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [ ] d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? [ ] e.Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] £] [] £] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] R:~TAFFRPT~0~PA9g. PCl 6/24/98 idb 26 Issues ~ suP~oim~G I~om~o~ sou~t¢~ tO. NOISE. Would the propo, al result in: a. Increase m existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Commumcations systems? Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies? 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Create light or glare? 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? b. Disturb archaeological resources? [1 [1 [] '[ ] [1 [1 [1 [1 [3 [] [3 [3 [3 [1 [3 [3 [] [1 [1 [1 [3 [] Ix] [1 [] [] [l [] [1 [] [3 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [l [1 [3 [1 [1 [1 [1 [x] IX] [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [1 [3 [1 IX] Ix] IX] [] IX] [1 [1 IX] IX] IX] Ix] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] R:~-'TAFFRIr/~05PA95.PCI 6/24/98 kfo 27 Affect historical resources? d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e. Restrict existing relig/ous or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduoe the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califorma history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the meremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed m connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] IX] IX] [] [] [] [] ix] [] [] IX] IX] R:I.STAFFRPT~0~PA98.PCl 6/24/98 klb 28 DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The pre-zoning and annexation of approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the incorporated City of Temecula. This project is a boundary shift between two local jurisdictions which will result in the re-assigning of responsibility for service provision to the area from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and the pre-zoning of these areas to a Specific Plan designation. No areas are anticipated to be impacted by the pre-zoning. These areas are currently zoned Specific Plan by the County of Riverside. The areas to be annexed have existing entitlements (approved Specific Plans, Development Agreements, Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Tentative Tract Maps, Development Plans, Conditional Use Permits, etc.) and portions have been either constructed or are under construction. The approvals are not being affected by the annexation. Police, Parks and Recreation and City of Temecula Governmental Services are the specific areas which have been identified to be affected by the annexation. These affects have been determined to be less than significant. 1. Land Use Planning The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in impacts which would conflict with general plan designation or zoning; conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project; be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity; affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses; or disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community). 2. Population and Housing The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects; induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure); or displace existing housing, especially affordable housing. 3. Geologic Problems The analysis contained in the IES has dexermined that the project would not result in or expose people to potential impacts involving the following: fault rupture; seismic ground shaking; seismic ground failure (including liquefaction); seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard; landslides or mudflows; erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill; subsidence of the land; expansive soils; or unique geologic or physical features. R:~-'TAFFRPT~05?A95.PCi 6/24/~8 klb 2~ 4. Water The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount of surface runofi~ exposure of people or propew/to water related hazards such as flooding; discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity); changes in the amount of surface water in any water body; changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements; change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability; altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater; impacts to groundwater quality, or substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies. 5. Air Quality The analysis contained in the 1ES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation; expose sensitive receptors to pollutants; alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate; or create objectionable odors. 6. Transportation/Circulation The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which woul& an increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion; hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses); inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses; insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site; hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists; conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks); or rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts. 7. Biological Resources The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds), locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees); locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.); wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool); or wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. 8. Energy and Mineral Resources The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: conflict with adopted energy conservation plans; use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner; or result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. R:~STAFFRPT~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 lob ~30 9. Hnznrds The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would: a risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation); possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard; exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards; or an increase to fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees. 10. Noise The analysis contained in the IES has determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts which would result in: an increase in existing noise levels or exposure of people to severe noise levels. 11. Public Services Fire Protection and Schools The analysis contained in the IES determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts to fire protection or schools. No additional increase in fire protection services or schools will be required as a result of this annexation. Fire Station 84 within the City of Temecula currently services the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and will continue to do so after annexation. No change will occur with respect to what school district the area falls within, or to the what schools students from the area will attend. Both the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans require the construction of schools to mitigate impacts with respect to the demand for schools. Annexation/pre-zoning of the area will not affect either the demand or the provision of schools within these specific plan areas. Police Protection There will be a significant impact to police protection; however, mitigation measures will reduce this to a level less than significant. In order to meet the City's established Level of Service standard of one officer per 1,000 residents, the increase in population as a result of the proposed annexation will require seven additional police officers. The increased cost for the seven police officers will be paid fi'om the City's General fund. Revenue sources include the property taxes from existing and future residential development and sales tax revenue from existing and future commercial and industrial development. After mitigation, no significant impacts are anticipated. Maintenance of Public Facilities Currently all existing dedicated streets and roads within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas are maintained by the Riverside County Road Department. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula, the City will become responsible for their maintenance. After annexation all existing streets will be added to the City's Pavement Management System. Funding for the City's Pavement Management System comes primarily from Gas Taxes and Measure A Funding which is allocated to municipalities based on population. With the annexation of this area and the associated increase in the population, additional funds will be available for road maintenance. R: \STAFFRPT~05PA95 .PCI 6/24/95 klb 31 All future improvement within the annexation area will be constructed by the developers as part of ongoing construction associated with the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. The City does not currently have any Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) within the area, nor or any anticipated for the near future. Other Public Services The proposed project will not result in additional impacts to library services, street sweeping and animal control. The annexation/pre-zoning area is currently a part of the Riverside County Library System. The City of Temecula is also a part of the Riverside County Library System. No change in the provision of library services is anticipated as a result of this project. Street sweeping service is provided to the Redhawk Specific Plan Area on a monthly basis by a private company contracted by the County. No street sweeping service is currently being provided to the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula street sweeping services will be provided to both specific plan areas on a weekly basis by the City's franehised solid waste hauler, CR&R. No appreciable change in service levels is anticipated as a result of this project. Animal control services within the annexation/pre-zoning area are currently provided by Riverside County. Upon annexation into the City animal control services will be provided by Lake Elsinore Animal Friends (LEAF). No appreciable change in service levels is anticipated as a result of this project. 12. Utilities and Service Systems The analysis contained in the IES determined that the proposed project will not result in additional impacts to the following: power or natural gas, communications systems, cable television services, local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities, sewer or septic tanks, storm water drainage, solid waste disposal or local or regional water supplies. Pow,r Currently the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas electrical power is served by Southern California Edison which is also currently providing service to the proposed annexation/pre-zoning area. No change in the provision of electrical services is anticipated as a result of this project. Natural Gas Natural gas service for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas is currently being provided by Southern California Gas Company. No change in the provision of natural gas services is anticipated as a result of this project. Communication Systems Telecommunication services for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation/pre=zoning area, are provided by General Telephone. No change in the provision of telecommunication services is anticipated as a result of this project. R:~STAFFRPT~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 10b 32 Cable Television Services Cable television services for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation/pre-zoning area, are provided by TCI. No change in the provision of telecommunication services is anticipated as a result of this project. !.ocal or Regional Water Treatment or Distribution Facilities & 1 .ocal or Relqonal Water Supplies The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) supplies potable water to the City of Temecula. Between 50% and 85% of the City's water supply (depending on the annual rainfall) is distributed from the Murrieta-Temecula groundwater basin. This water supply is supplemented from imported water from the Metropolitan Water District (EMWD). The RCWD has a current annual supply capacity of 59,000 acre feet which is adequate to meet current demand for potable water including the annexation/pre-zoning area. The Water District is investigating a number of sources to meet long-range demands including upgrading existing wells, adding wells, implementing a water recharge program, and increasing the use of reclaimed water. A combination of these improvements will ultimately be necessary to accommodate future demands in the City. The RCWD currently supplies water to the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and would continue to do so upon annexation/pre-zoning. No change in the provision of water is anticipated as a result of this project. Sewer or Septic Tanks Wastewater facilities for the City of Temecula and its sphere of influence are provided by Eastern municipal Water District (EMWD) which is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Water District is currently meeting treatment demand in the Temecula and has a current capacity to treat 10 million gallons per day it is facility. Additionally Rancho California Water District has a wastewater treatment facility services the Temecula area which has capacity to treat 3.4 million gallons per day. The Redhawk/Vail Ranch area is currently being serviced by the EMWD facility and will continue to be upon annexation/pre-zoning. The Water District anticipates expansion of its existing facilities when the demand generated by continuing development requires it. No change in the provision of water is anticipated as a result of this project. Storm Water Currently all storm water for the annexation area drains to Temecula Creek. All flood control facilities within the annexation area are either maintained by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is responsible for the maintenance of all facilities which are designed to the specifications of and accepted by them. This arrangement exists for all territories within Riverside County, whether they located within the jurisdictional boundaries of a city or they are within an unincorporated area of the County. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula all flood control facilities will continue to be maintained by either RCFC&WCD or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. No change in the handling ofstormwater is anticipated as a result of this project. R:~STAFFRF~05P^98.PC1 6/24/98 klb 33 The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval by the registered voters in the annexation area of the City's Special Tax which will levy rates and charges for park maintenance on the property tax rolls. The maintenance of all medians and the majority of slope areas are currently the responsibility of County Service Area (CSA) 143. A portion of the slope areas are the responsibility of the Redhawk Home Owner's Association (HOA) and other smaller areas are the responsibility of private property owners. Upon annexation and the approval of the City's Special Tax for the maintenance of parks, recreational facilities, arterial street lights, traffic signals, medians and the provision of recreational and human services programs by the registered voters within the annexation area; and the requisite approval of changes fro slope maintenance and all medians and those slopes which are currently the responsibility of CSA 143 would become the responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). The responsibility of those slopes which are currently held by the Redhawk HOA and private property owners would remain unchanged when the area is annexed to the City. Currently CSA 143 contracts with one or more private landscape contract firms to provide median and slope maintenance services. The rates and charges to pay for this service are levied against the property tax rolls. Upon successful annexation to the City, the TCSD would bid the maintenance areas and award contract(s) to private landscape maintenance contractor(s). The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval by the registered voters in the annexation area of the City's (TCSD) Special Tax which will levy rates and charges for the maintenance of slopes and medians on the property tax rolls. R:~,STAFFRPT~05PA98.PC1 6/'24/98 klb 35 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 (ANNEXATION - REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) The Initial Environmental Study (IF.S) for Planning Application No. PA98-0205 identified one issue (Public Services, Police Protection) as having a potentially significant impact unless mitigation is incorporated. This is discussed below: P-blic ~ervices General Impact: Need for additional police officers at time of annexation through build out of Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas. Mitigation Measure: Hire additional police officers as the population in the area grows. Specific Process: Police officers, at a level of service standard of one officer per 1,000 residents, shall be added to the City's police force. Initially seven (7) police officers will need to be hired to maintain the City's Level of Service requirements. The increased cost for the seven police officers required initially and any future officers will be paid from the City's General fund. Revenue sources include the property taxes from existing and future residential development and sales tax revenue from existing and future commercial and industrial development. Mitigation Milestone: Per increase of 1,000 residents. Responsible Monitoring Party: City Manager, Finance and Police R:'k,qTAFFRPT~PA98.PCI 6/24/98 k]b 37 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES R:'~I'AFFRP'I~2(~PA98.PC1 6~24/95 I~b 38 DEAFT Plan for Provision of Municipal Services Plcmning Application No. PA98-0205 Annexation of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas to the City of Temecula, California INTRODUCTION The following discussion provides documentation of the City of Temecula's plan to provide and/or assure the provision of municipal and other associated services to an area consisting of approximately 1995 acres and is generally referred to as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch areas for proposed annexation into the City. This plan has been prepared pursuant to Sections 56800 and 56653 of the California Government Code, et. Seq. The plan describes the extent to which the following services will be provided to this territory: police protection, fire protection, water service, wastewater service, storm water service, solid waste disposal, street maintenance, median and slope maintenance, parks, electric, natural gas, telecommunications, cable, schools, libraries, street sweeping and animal control. PRO)'ECT DESCRIPTION/I.OCATION The proposed annexation area is bounded by the City's southern city boundary and SR 79 to the north, the City's southern most sphere of influence boundary to the south, the City's southeastern city boundary and Pala Road to the west, and small portions of Butterfield Stage Road and Anza Road, and a portion of the City's southeastern Sphere of Influence to the east. The annexation area contains the Bedhawk Specific Plan(SP No. 217) and Vail Ranch Specific Plan (SP No. 223) Specific Plan areas (approved in August of 1988 and July of 1988, respectively by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors). These areas have partially been and are currently being constructed with single-family detached residential homes. The proposed annexation area consists of 1995 total acres which includes approximately 2400 existing single-family detached units, three existing schools, three existing parks, a Texaco gas station/convenience market, a Jack-N-The-Box fast food restaurant (under construction) and an 18-hole golf course. The specific plan areas, as designed and approved, will ultimately contain at build out a total of 6619 dwelling units (3456 single-family detached, 1340 single-family attached, 1823 multi-family), 107 acres of parks, five schools, 154 acres of commercial, 161 acres of open space, and a 183 acre 18-hole golf course. The combined overall gross density of the annexation area is between 3.3 and 3.4 dwelling units per acre. The City of Temecula will adopt the zoning which was established within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans which were adopted by the County of Riverside when the project is pre- zoned. The subject property will be pre-zoned with specific plan zoning with the exact land uses specified within each of the respective specific plans. POt.TCV. PROTE. CTION Police protection and law enforcement services are provided in the City of Temecula through a provision of services contract with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. The City has one main station located at 30755 Auld Road, and two storefront stations located at 27540 Ynez Road, Suite J-9 and 28816 Pujol Street. R:~-'TAFFRF]~05PA95.PCI 6/24/98 klb 39 DRAFT City of Temecula PA9~-0205 Annexation of Redhowk/Voil l:t. anch Plan of Service* For fiscal year 1997/98 the city of Temecula provided an average of one officer per 1,000 residents with 43 police personnel serving the City. Three to ten patrol cars are on duty at all times, plus additional services including traffic enforcement and investigation, Community Service Officers, Community Oriented Policing Teams and School Resource Officers. Personnel also include Reserve Police Officers, Police Volunteers and Police F_,xplorers. The average response time to priority one calls in Temecula is approximately 6.5 minutes. The average Sheriff's Department response time to priority one calls within the proposed annexation area is approximately 12 minutes. For fiscal year 1998/99, the City of Temecula has allocated $5.6 million for police protection. In order to meet the City's established Level of Service standard of one officer per 1,000 residents, the increase in population as a result of the proposed annexation will require an additional seven police officers. Fllq~. PROT~.CTION Fire protection services are provided in the City of Temecula through a provision of services contract with the Riverside County Fire Department which operates in conjunction with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF). The City of Temecula has three existing fire stations within the city limits. Station 73 is located at 27415 Enterprise Circle, Station 12 is located at 28330 Mercedes, and Station 84 is located at 30650 Pauba Road, approximately 4 miles north of the subject site. There is also one additional fire station in the unincorporated area of the county which is in the vicinity of the City of Temecula. Station 83 will begin operation at French Valley Airport in July of 1998. This station though located in an unincorporated portion of the County will be jointly funded and operated by the City and the County. The City also has a mutual aid agreement with Riverside County, California Department of Forestry (CDF), and the City of Murrieta. Current staffing levels for the stations servicing the City of Temecula include the following: Station 73 Station 12 Station 84 Station 83 1 engine, 1 truck 1 engine, 1 second roll engine (manned by volunteers) 1 engine, 1 second roll engine & 1 breathing support squad (manned by volunteers) 1 engine (the number of staff members for an engine is three persons, with four persons for a truck) For fiscal year 1997/1998 the City of Temecula allocated approximately $ 3.1 for fire protection services. No additional increase in fire protection services will be required as a result of this annexation. Fire Station 84 within the City of Temecula currently services the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and will continue to do so after annexation. A fire station within the boundary of the annexation at Butterfield Stage Road, south of Highway 79 is proposed. This station will ultimately service the area and is scheduled to be constructed in 2000/2001. R:\STAFl~RPT~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb 40 DE'AFT Cit~ of Temecula PA91~)205 Annexation of Redh~,,k/Vafl P, anch Plan of Serv~cee WATF. R SFRVICF. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) supplies potable water to the City of Temecula. Between 50% and 85% of the City's water supply (depending on the annual rainfall) is distributed from the Murrieta-Temecula groundwater basin. This water supply is supplemented from imported water from the Eastern Metropolitan Water District (EMW'D). The RCWD has a curTent annual supply capacity of 59,000 acre feet which is adequate to meet current demand for potable water including the annexation area. Rancho California Water District is investigating a number of sources to meet long-range demands including upgrading existing wells, adding wells, implementing a water recharge program, and increasing the use of reclaimed water. A combination of these improvements will ultimately be necessary to accommodate future demands in the City. The RCWD currently supplies water to the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and would continue to do so upon annexation. WASTFWA~ SERVICF. Wastewater facilities for the City of Temecula and its sphere of influence are provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) which is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Eastern Municipal Water District is currently meeting treatment demand in the Temecula area and has a current capacity to treat 10 million gallons per day at its facility. Additionally, l::{ancho California Water District (RCWD) has wastewater treatment facilities which service the Ternecula area. These facilities have the capacity to treat 3.4 million gallons per day. The t:~dhawk/Vail Ranch area is currently being serviced by the EMWD facility and will continue to be upon annexation. Rancho California Water District anticipates expansion of its existing facilities when the demand generated by continuing development requires it. STORM WATF..R Currently all storm'water for the annexation area drains to Temecula Creek. All flood control facilities within the annexation area are either maintained by Paverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is responsible for the maintenance of all facilities which are designed to the specifications of and accepted by them. This arrangement exists for all territories within Riverside County, whether they are located within the jurisdictional boundaries of a city or whether they are within an unincorporated area of the County. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula all flood control facilities will continue to be maintained by either RCFC&WCD or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. SO!.!D WASTF. DISPOSAl. Currently solid waste services to the annexation area are being provided to the County by Waste Management Inland Valley. Solid waste disposal service within the City limits is provided by CR&R which is a pr/vately operated company being contracted by the City. Upon annexation to the City, solid waste disposal services for the annexation area will ultimately be provided by CR&.R. The City will negotiate with the County, Waste Management Inland Valley and CR&R to transition service for the next fiscal year following the finalization of the annexation. Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 939 all cities and counties must have a waste stream source reduction plan. The City has such a plan and will implement that plan in the annexed area. R:\STAFFRF'f~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb 41 D A.FT Cid/of Temecul,, Ann~n of Redh~r~JV~il Rcmch Plan of Services STlqF.~ lvfAT~ANCF. Currently all existing dedicated streets and roads within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas are maintained by the Riverside County Road Department. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula, the City will become responsible for their maintenance. After annexation all existing streets will be added to the City's Pavement Management System. Funding for the City's Pavement Management System comes primarily from C~s Taxes and Mecasure A Funding which is allocated to municipcdities based on population. With the annexation of this area and the associated increase in the population, additional funds will be available for road maintenance. All future improvement within the annexation area will be constructed by the developers as part of ongoing construction associated with the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. The City does not currently have any Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) within the area, nor or any anticipated for the near future. MEDIAN AND SLOPE MAJNTE. NANCE. The maintenance of all medians and the majority of slope areas are currently the responsibility of County Service Area (CSAJ 143. A portion of the slope areas are the responsibility of the Redhawk Home Owner's Association (HOA) and other smaller areas are the responsibility of private property owners. Upon annexation and the approval of the City's Special Tax for the maintenance of parks, recreational facilities, arterial street lights, traffic signals, medians and the provision of recreational and human services programs, by the registered voters within the annexation area; all medians and those slopes which are currently the responsibility of CSA 143 would become the responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). The responsibility of those slopes which are currently held by the Redhawk HOA and private property owners would remain unchanged when the area is annexed to the City. Currently CSA 143 contracts with one or more private landscape contract firms to provide median and slope maintenance services. The rates and charges to pay for this service are levied against the property tax rolls. Upon successful annexation to the City, the TCSD would bid the maintenance areas and award contract(s) to private landscape maintenance contractor(s). The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval, by the registered voters in the annexation area, of the City's (TCSD) Special Tax which will levy rates and charges for the maintenance of slopes and medians on the property tax rolls. PARK S F..RVICF..S The maintenance of parks areas in the annexation area is currently the responsibility of County Service Area (CSA) 143. Upon annexation and the approval of the City's Special Tax for the maintenance of parks, recreational facilities, arterial street lights, traffic signals, medians and the provision of recreational and human services programs by the registered voters within the annexation area; all parks within the annexation area which are currently the responsibility of CSA 143 would become the responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). Currently CSA 143 contracts with one or more private landscape contract firms to provide park maintenance services. The rates and charges to pay for this service are levied against the property tax rolls. Upon successful annexation to the City, the TCSD would bid the maintenance areas and award contract(s) to private landscape maintenance contractor(s). R:~STAFFRPT~05PAg$.PC1 6/'24/9g 10b 42 DRAFT Oity of Temecula PAge.0205 Annaxatmn o! Redhawt~ai] Ranch I~m of Service-. The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval, by the registered voters in the annexation area, of the City's (TCSD) Special Tax which will levy rates and charges for park maintenance on the property tax rolls. E! F..CTRIC POWE. R SF..RVICF. Currently the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas is served by Southern California Edison which is also currently providing service to the proposed annexation area. No change in the provision of electrical services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. NATURAl. GAS SERVICE. Natural gas service for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas is currently being provided by Southern California Gas Company. No change in the provision of natural gas services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. TE.! .ECOMMUNICATION ST. IqVICV..S Telecommunication services for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation area, are provided by General Telephone. No change in the provision of telecommunication services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. CAB!.F.. TF.!.kT~ISION SF..I:IVICIq. S Cable television services for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation area, are provided by TCI. No change in the provision of cable television services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. SCHOOJ.S The proposed annexation area is within the Temecula Unified School District. Upon annexation, no change will occur with respect to what school district the area fans within, or to the what schools students from the area will attend. Both the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans require the construction of schools to mitigate impacts with respect to the demand for schools. Annexation of the area will not affect either the demand or the provision of schools within these specific plan areas. The schools that currently serve the area, student capacity and current enrollment are listed in the following table: Pauba Valley Elementary Redhawk Elementary Vail Ranch Temecula Valley High school Redhawk II Elementary (to open July 1999) CAPACTI'Y CURRENT ENROI J:MENT (~'of students) (~ -of students) 1000 911 880 75O 1200 1086 data not available data not available 525 R:~STAI~"RFI'~05PA98.PCI 6/24/98 kib 4~ City of Ternecula PA98-0205 Ann~0x~tion of Redho~k/Voil R~nch Plan of Ser~ice-~ T.TARARI~,S The annexation area is currently a part of the Riverside County Library System. The City of Temecula is also a part of the Riverside County Library System. Upon annexation, the library district which serves the area will not change. STlqEI::T SWF. F. PING Street sweeping service is provided to the Redhawk Specific Plan Area on a monthly l:x:~sis by a private company contracted by the County. No street sweeping service is currently being provided to the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula street sweeping services will be provided to both specific plan areas on a weekly basis by the City's franchised solid waste hauler, CR&R. ANIMAL CONTROL Animal control services within the annexation area are currently provided by Riverside County. Upon annexation into the City animal control services will be provided by Lake Elsinore Animal Friends (T FAF). No appreciable change in service levels is anticipated as a result of annexation. SUMMARY In evaluating the impacts associated with the proposed annexation, several analyses have been conducted by the City to evaluate the availability of public services and facilities. These analyses included the subject Plan for Services, a Fiscal Impact Analysis and an Environmental Assessment. The results of these analyses concluded that the subject property will not have a significant impact on the capabilities of the City or other service/infrastructure providers to provide services. Currently the City is capable of meeting the demands for services within the current City boundaries and the proposed annexation area. As development occurs, the City will receive additional property taxes and future sales tax associated with future commercial development. Upon annexation, the City will provide services, consistent with the demand generated by the areas within the annexation area based upon the general funds available to the City, City-wide assessments and the established Community Facilities Districts. R:\STAFFRPT~205PA98.PCI 6/24/98 klb ~' ATTACHMENT NO. 5 EXHIBITS ATTACHMENT NO. 6 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED STATE OF CAUFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT l, 464 W. 4th STREET, $th FLOOR SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 I~E'r~ WILSON. Go~mor June 19, 1998 08-Riv-79-17.3 Mr. John DeGange Project Planner City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Mr. DeGange: Plannina ADmlication 98-0205 Please send a copy of the Negative Declaration to this office at the earliest opportunity. Caltrans supports economic growth and orderly land use development; however, new development must pay its fair share for upgrading infrastructure facilities needed to serve the development. This infrastructure includes State highways and freeways. It also includes both direct and cumulative traffic impacts. All jurisdictions should take measures available to fund improvements and reduce total trips generated. In view of the fact there are limited funds available for infrastructure improvements, we recommend the City of Temecula take the lead in developing a fair-share mechanism in which each project can fund improvements for the decrease in Level of Service (LOS) for which it is responsible. If you have any questions, please contact Mike Sim at (909) 383-4808 or FAX (909) 383-7934. Sincerely, LINDA GRIMES, Chief Office of Regional Planning/ Forecasting/Public Transportation CITY OF TEMECULA PROPOSED REDHA WK/ VAIl. RANCH ANNEXATION AREA ~ $1~I~RE OFa, ldFLU~U~'~' PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 EXHIBIT A MAP OF ANNEXATION AREA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: July 1, 1998 47 CITY OF TEMECULA NOT H P PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 EXHIBIT B GENERAL PLAN MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: July 1, 1998 48 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLAN FOR PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES R:\STAFFRPT~205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd 10 Plan for Provision of Municipal Services Planning Application No. PA98-0205 Annexation of the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan Areas to the City of Temecula, California INTRODUCTION The following discussion provides documentation of the City of Temecula's plan to provide and/or assure the provision of municipal and other associated services to an area consisting of approximately 1995 acres and is generally referred to as the Redhawk and Vail Ranch areas for proposed annexation into the City. This plan has been prepared pursuant to Sections 56800 and 56653 of the California Government Code, et. Seq. The plan describes the extent to which the following senrices will be provided to this territory: police protection, fire protection, water service, wastewater service, storm water service, solid waste disposal, street maintenance, median and slope maintenance, parks, electric, natural gas, telecommunications, cable, schools, libraries, street sweeping and animal control. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION The proposed annexation area is bounded by the City's southern city boundary and SR 79 to the north, the City's southern most sphere of influence boundary to the south, the City's southeastern city boundary and Pala Road to the west, and small portions of Butterfield Stage Road and Anza Road, and a portion of the City's southeastern Sphere of Influence to the east. The annexation area contains the Redhawk Specific Plan(SP No. 217) and Vail Ranch Specific Plan (SP No. 223) Specific Plan areas (approved in August of 1988 and July of 1988, respectively by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors). These areas have partially been and are currently being constructed with single-family detached residential homes. The proposed annexation area consists of 1995 total acres which includes approximately 2400 existing single-family detached units, three existing schools, three existing parks, a Texaco gas station/convenience market, a Jack-N-The-Box fast food restaurant (under construction) and an 18-hole golf course. The specific plan areas, as designed and approved, will ultimately contain at build out a total of 6619 dwelling units (3456 single-family detached, 1340 single-family attached, 1823 multi-family), 107 acres of parks, five schools, 154 acres of commercial, 161 acres of open space, and a 183 acre 18-hole golf course. The combined overall gross density of the annexation area is between 3.3 and 3.4 dwelling units per acre. The City of Temecula will adopt the zoning which was established within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans which were adopted by the County of Riverside when the project is pre- zoned. The subject property will be pre-zoned with specific plan zoning with the exact land uses specified within each of the respective specific plans. R:~DEGANGEJ"~ax,q~X~LNSRV C.RPT 7/'20/98 jd ]- City of Temecula PA98-0205 Annexation of Redhawk,Vail Rcmch Plan of Servicea POLICE PROTECTION Police protection and law enforcement services are provided in the City of Temecula through a provision of services contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The City has one main station located at 30755 Auld Road, and two storefront stations located at 27540 Ynez Road, Suite J-9 and 28816 Pujol Street. For fiscal year 1997/98 the city of Temecula provided an average of one officer per 1,000 residents with 43 police personnel serving the City. Three to ten patrol cars are on duty at all times, plus additional services including traffic enforcement and investigation, Community Service Officers, Community Oriented Policing Teams and School Resource Officers. Personnel also include Reserve Police Officers, Police Volunteers and Police Explorers. The average response time to priority one calls in Temecula is approximately 6.5 minutes. The average Sheriff's Department response time to priority one calls within the proposed annexation area is approximately 12 minutes. For fiscal year 1998/99, the City of Temecula has allocated $5.6 million for police protection. In order to meet the City's established Level of Service standard of one officer per 1,000 residents, the increase in population as a result of the proposed annexation will require an additional seven police officers. FIRE PROTECTION Fire protection services are provided in the City of Temecula through a provision of services contract with the Riverside County Fire Department which operates in conjunction with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF). The City of Temecula has three existing fire stations within the city limits. Station 73 is located at 27415 Enterprise Circle, Station 12 is located at 28330 Mercedes, and Station 84 is located at 30650 Pauba Road, approximately 3 miles north of the subject site. There is also one additional fire station in an unincorporated area of the county which is in the vicinity of the City of Temecula. Station 83 will begin operation at French Valley Airport in July of 1998. This station though located in an unincorporated portion of the County will be jointly funded and operated by the City and the County. The City also has a mutual aid agreement with Riverside County, the California Department of Forestry (CDF), and the City of Murrieta. Current staffing levels for the stations servicing the City of Temecula include the following: Station 73 - Station 12- Station 84 - Station 83 - 1 engine, 1 truck 1 engine, 1 second roll engine (manned by volunteers) 1 engine, 1 second roll engine & 1 breathing support squad (manned by volunteers) 1 engine (the number of staff members for an engine is three persons, with four persons for a truck) For fiscal year 1997/1998 the City of Temecula allocated approximately $ 3.1 for fire protection R :',DEGAN GEJ~,ANNEX~PLNSRV C.RPT 7/20/98 jd 2 City of Temecula PA98-0205 Annexation of Redhawk/Vail Ranch Plan of Services services. No additional increase in fire protection services will be required as a result of this annexation. Fire Station 84 within the City of Temecula currently services the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and will continue to do so after annexation. A fire station within the boundary of the annexation at Butterfield Stage Road, south of Highway 79 is proposed. This station will ultimately service the area and is scheduled to be constructed in 2000/2001. WATER SERVICE The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) supplies potable water to the City of Temecula. Between 50% and 85% of the City's water supply (depending on the annual rainfall) is distributed from the Murrieta-Temecula groundwater basin. This water supply is supplemented from imported water from the Eastern Metropolitan Water District (EMWD). The RCWD has a current annual supply capacity of 59,000 acre feet which is adequate to meet current demand for potable water including the annexation area. Rancho California Water District is investigating a number of sources to meet long-range demands including upgrading existing wells, adding wells, implementing a water recharge program, and increasing the use of reclaimed water. A combination of these improvements will ultimately be necessary to accommodate future demands in the City. The RC'WD currently supplies water to the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area and would continue to do so upon annexation. WASTEWATER SERVICE Wastewater facilities for the City of Temecula and its sphere of influence are provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) which is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Eastern Municipal Water District is currently meeting treatment demand in the Temecula area and has a current capacity to treat 10 million gallons per day at its facility. Additionally, Rancho California Water District (RCWD) has wastewater treatment facilities which service the Temecula area. These facilities have the capacity to treat 3.4 million gallons per day. The Redhawk/Vail Ranch area is currently being serviced by the EMWD facility and will continue to be upon annexation. Rancho California Water District anticipates expansion of its existing facilities when the demand generated by continuing development requires it. STORM WATER Currently all storm water for the annexation area drains to Temecula Creek. All flood control facilities within the annexation area are either maintained by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is responsible for the maintenance of all facilities which are designed to the specifications of and accepted by them. This arrangement exists for all territories within Riverside County, whether they are located within the jurisdictional R:~DEGANGEAANNEX%PLNSRVC.P-.PT 7/20/98 jd 3 City of Temecula PA98-0205 Annexation of RedhcmrkArail Ranch Plcm of Services boundaries of a city or whether they are within an unincorporated area of the County. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula all flood control facilities will continue to be maintained by either RCFC&WCD or the Redhawk Home Owner's Association. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Currently solid waste services to the annexation area are being provided to the County by Waste Management Inland Valley. Solid waste disposal service within the City limits is provided by CR&_R which is a privately operated company being contracted by the City. Upon annexation to the City, solid waste disposal services for the annexation area will ultimately be provided by CR&R. The City will negotiate with the County, Waste Management Inland Valley and CR&_R to transition service for the next fiscal year following the finalization of the annexation. Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 939 all cities and counties must have a waste stream source reduction plan. The City has such a plan and will implement that plan in the annexed area. STREET MAINTENANCE Currently all existing dedicated streets and roads within the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plan areas are maintained by the Riverside County Road Department. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula, the City will become responsible for their maintenance. After annexation all existing streets will be added to the City's Pavement Management System. Funding for the City's Pavement Management System comes primarily from Gas Taxes and Measure A Funding which is allocated to municipalities based on population. With the annexation of this area and the associated increase in the population, additional funds will be available for road maintenance. All future improvement within the annexation area will be constructed by the developers as part of ongoing construction associated with the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans. The City does not currently have any Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) within the area, nor or any anticipated for the near future. SLOPE MAINTENANCE The maintenance of the majority of slope areas are currently the responsibility of County Service Area (CSA) 143. A podion of the slope areas are the responsibility of the Redhawk Home Owner's Association (HOA) and other smaller areas are the responsibility of private property owners. Upon annexation and the approval of the City's Rates and Charges for the maintenance of slopes, by the registered voters within the annexation area, those slopes which are currently the responsibility of CSA 143 would become the responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). The responsibility of those slopes which are currently held by the Redhawk HOA and private property owners would remain unchanged when the area is annexed to the City. Currently CSA 143 contracts with one or more private landscape contract firms to provide median and slope maintenance services. The rates and charges to pay for this service are levied against R:~DEGANGE~ANNEX~PLNSRvC.RPT 7/20/98 jd 4 City of Temecula PA98-0205 Annexation of Redhawk/Vail Ranch Plan of Services the property tax rolls. Upon successful annexation to the City, the TCSD would bid the maintenance areas and award contract(s) to private landscape maintenance contractor(s). The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval, by the registered voters in the annexation area, of the City's (TCSD) Special Tax which is levied for the above services on the property tax rolls. PARK AND MEDIAN MAINTENANCE SERVICES The maintenance of parks and medians in the annexation area is currently the responsibility of County Service Area (CSA) 143. Upon annexation and the approval of the City's Special Tax for the maintenance of parks, recreational facilities, arterial street lights, traffic signals, medians and the provision of recreational and human services programs by the registered voters within the annexation area; all parks within the annexation area which are currently the responsibility of CSA 143 would become the responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). Currently CSA 143 contracts with one or more private landscape contract firms to provide park maintenance services. The rates and charges to pay for this service are levied against the property tax rolls. Upon successful annexation to the City, the TCSD would bid the maintenance areas and award contract(s) to private landscape maintenance contractor(s). The proposed annexation is contingent upon approval, by the registered voters in the annexation area, of the City's (TCSD) Special Tax which will levy rates and charges for park maintenance on the property tax rolls. ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE Currently the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas is served by Southern California Edison which is also currently providing service to the proposed annexation area. No change in the provision of electrical services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. NATURAL GAS SERVICE Natural gas service for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas is currently being provided by Southern California Gas Company. No change in the provision of natural gas services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES Telecommunication senrices for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation area, are provided by General Telephone. No change in the provision of telecommunication services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. R:~DE GANGE,hANNEXXPLN SRV C.RPT 7/20/95 jd 5 City of Ternecula PA98-0205 Annexation of Redhawk/Vail Rcmch Plan of Services CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES Cable television services for the City of Temecula and the surrounding areas, including the annexation area, are provided by TCI. No change in the provision of cable television services is anticipated with the annexation of this territory. SCHOOLS The proposed annexation area is within the Temecula Unified School District. Upon annexation, no change will occur with respect to what school district the area falls within, or to the what schools students from the area will attend. Both the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Specific Plans require the construction of schools to mitigate impacts with respect to the demand for schools. Annexation of the area will not affect either the demand or the provision of schools within these specific plan areas. The schools that currently serve the area, student capacity and current enrollment are listed in the following table: SCHOOL CAPACITY (# of students) CURRENT ENROLLMENT (# of students) Pauba Valley Elementary 1000 911 Redhawk Elementary 880 750 Vail Ranch Middle School 1200 1086 Temecula Valley High school data not available data not available Redhawk Elementary II (to open July 1999) 525 LIBRARIES The annexation area is currently a p~rt of the Riverside County Library System. The City of Temecula is also a part of the Riverside County Library System. Upon annexation, the library district which serves the area will not change. STREET SWEEPING Street sweeping service is provided to the Redhawk Specific Plan Area on a monthly basis by a private company contracted by the County. No street sweeping service is currently being provided to the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area. Upon annexation into the City of Temecula street sweeping services will be provided to both specific plan areas on a weekly basis by the City's franchised solid waste hauler, CR&R. R:XDEGANG~LNSRVC.RPT 7/20/98 jd 6 City of Ternecula PA98-0205 Annexation of Redhawk/Vc~il Rc~nch Plan of Services ANIMAL CONTROL Animal control senrices within the annexation area are currently provided by Riverside County. Upon annexation into the City animal control services will be provided by Lake Elsinore Animal Friends (~ .F. AF). No appreciable change in service levels is anticipated as a result of annexation. SUMMARY In evaluating the impacts associated with the proposed annexation, several analyses have been conducted by the City to evaluate the availability of public services and facilities. These analyses included the subject Plan for Services, a Fiscal Impact Analysis and an Environmental Assessment. The results of these analyses concluded that the subject property will not have a significant impact on the capabilities of the City or other service/infrastructure providers to provide services. Currently the City is capable of meeting the demands for services within the current City boundaries and the proposed annexation area. As development occurs, the City will receive additional property taxes and future sales tax associated with future commercial development. Upon annexation, the City will provide services, consistent with the demand generated by the areas within the annexation area based upon the general funds available to the City, City-wide assessments and the established Community Facilities Districts. R:XDEGANGEJXANNEXXPLNSRVC.RPT 7/20/98 jd 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS R:\STAFFRFrL205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd 20 CITY OF TEMECULA FISCAL ANALYSIS COUNTY OF RIVERSlD FISCAL ANALYSIS REPORT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FISCAL ANALYSIS OF REDHAWK/VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AREA The "County of Riverside Guide to Preparing Fiscal Impact Reports recommends that LAFCO annexation studies use the Case Study Method in preparing a Fiscal Impact Report ("FIR"). This method consists of identifying and analyzing the projected revenue and cost of providing various County services including public safety, animal control, library services, and read maintenance in a LAFCO annexation area. The attached tables have been prepared in accordance with the County of Riverside "Guide to Preparing Fiscal Impact Reports" ("County Guide") and direction received from Riverside County Administrative Office staff. These tables provide a FIR of the proposed annexation area based on applying the multipliers in the 1995 County Guide, and increasing these multipliers by the Cost and Price Index ("cPr') for the fiscal years 1996 (1.017), 1997 (1.035), and 1998 (1.018). In addition to applying the CPI, the following assumptions/considerations were applied: The Red hawk Golf Course was not considered in the analysis because it is a private golf course. Major road improvements were calculated using the County multipliers and were deemed to be needed in year 5 and at build out, causing significant spikes in the recurring costs to the County. All Property valuations were taken from a fiscal analysis performed on the proposed annexation area by Stan Hoffman & Associates for the City of Temecula. There are no hotels planned for the annexation area. Growth projections for the County FIR are consistent with those used in the City of Temecula's fiscal analysis of the proposed annexation area. The property transfer tax was applied at the rate of. 11% to the total change in property valuation for the first five years when new homes are still being built. For the remaining years, the transfer tax rate of .11% was applied to 10% of the total residential property valuation. Sales taxes are applied and increased as retail is phased into the annexation area per the approved specific plans. There is no Transient Occupancy Tax because there are no hotels identified in the annexation area. Investment income is not foreseen in this annexation area, and has not been included in this analysis. County Service Area 143 is the provider of street maintenance, street lighting, landscape maintenance, drainage control, fire hydrants, golf course maintenance, water and sewage treatment, trash collection, fire and police protection, and community centers. These operations are supported by special assessments levied on the annexation area, and are not included in this analysis since they do not impact the County General Fund. CSA 152, a self-sustaining District which provides funding to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, collects funding based on a parcel charge. NPDES will not be affected by annexation, and is not considered relevant to this analysis because it does not impact the County General Fund. There are both a Mello-Roos District and Assessment District 159 which cover portions of the annexation area. These self-sustaining Districts will not be affected by the annexation, and are not considered relevant to this analysis since they do not impact the County General Fund. 00000~0000 00000~00 0 00000~0000 00000~0000 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 CORRESPONDENCE R:\STAFFRF~205PA98.CC 7/20/98 jd 2 1 M. James Lorenz Samuel C. Alhadeff Jerry M. Cannon Robert D. Rose Keith R. Solar Robert J. Parks Philip D. Oberhansley Micl~ael J. Dist~er Jol~n R. Heisner Joseph L. Marshall Leslie C. Detwiler Glenn M. Feeley Stephen M. Bdgandi Thomas T. Lorc~ LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 27555 YNEZ ROAD, SUITE 203 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92591-4677 MAIN TELEPHONE: (909) 699-9088 FACSIMILE: (909) 699-9878 Offices in San Diego, Temecula, and Lafayette, California Michael J. Barry Richard J. Bayless Craig V. Butler Cydl J. Dantchev S. Douglas Kemer Frank J. Polek Les W. Robertson Marjeta D. Six Robert K. Edmuncls Craig S. Engstrand Charles F. Gorder, St. Ma~leline Clark Silberman June 25, 1998 SAMUEL C, ALHADEFF SALHADEFF(~LORENZLAW.COM (9O9) 699-9088 7218.006 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Gary Thomhill Director of Community Development City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Ms. Marcia Slaven Acting Chairperson Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Re: Planning Application No. PA98-0205 (Prezoning and Annexation - Vail Ranch and Redhawk) Dear Mr. Thomhill and Ms. Slaven: We represent MDC Vail, the owner of that certain real property commonly referred to as Vail Ranch. More specifically, that property is entitled with Specific Plan No. 223 (the "Plan"). On behalf of our client we hereby object to the annexation of our client's property into the City of Temecula. We are in receipt of the Notice of Public Hearing, which is scheduled for July 1, 1998. We hereby object to and challenge the rights to proceed with this annexation, inasmuch as it affects and impacts our client's property and deprives the owners of vested rights, including its rights under the "Plan". Further, our client's objections are based on the following, including but not limited to: "Plan;" The proposed annexation would adversely impact the rights under the MEMBER OF COMMERCIAL LAW AFFILIATES, INDEPENDENT BUSINESS AND LITIGATION LAWFIRMS tN PRINCIPAL CITIES WORLDWIDE LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP Gary Thomhill June 25, 1998 Page 2 2. The proposed annexation would adversely effect agreements for current fixed fees and costs, which are less than the City mandated fees and costs; 3. The proposed annexation would adversely impact the current land use and zoning, and perhaps require the imposition of CUPs for perspective purchasers; 4. The proposed annexation adversely impacts and substantially increases development standards, landscape standards and signage standards, which under current County laws are less restrictive; 5. The proposed annexation would increase the time for project processing for purchasers of real property from the owners; 6. The proposed annexation would adversely impact current tax and business incentives, which the City of Temecula does not offer to owners, developers and businesses; 7. The proposed annexation would adversely impact current design guidelines now in effect, and would require substantial rework by the owners; 8. The proposed annexation would add new levels of assessments and costs to the development of the property; 9. The proposed annexation would adversely impact credits and fees due to the owners under Assessment District 159 and adversely impact agreements reached with the County concerning Assessment District 159; 10. The proposed annexation does not provide for reimbursement of park fees to the developers and owners of Vail Kanch for parks which now do not exist; 11. The proposed annexation would adversely impact the redevelopment of the historic site, current agreements with the County concerning the historic sites, reimbursements and costs to be absorbed by the County with regard to the historic site, and the development of the historic site; 12. The proposed annexation would adversely impact boundary adjustment guidelines and the development of properties, and sales to purchasers of property; 13. The proposed annexation would adversely impact encroachment permits for Redhawk and Butterfield Stage Road infrastructure issues that now exist between various parties; 14. The proposed annexation increases the developer impact fees and makes it more expensive for the owners to develop their property. It would impact future business owners within the project; MEMBER OF COMMERCIAL LAW AFFILIATES, INDEPENDENT BUS~tE$S ANO LITIGATION LAW FIRMS tN PRINCIPAl. CITIES WORLDt4~IOE Gary Thornhill June 25, 1998 Page 3 LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP 15. The proposed annexation would adversely impact the private roads and would require dedication of now existing private roads; and 16. The proposed annexation has not been adequately explained, nor have any reports been issued to the property owners, nor has the City consulted with the property owners concerning the proposed annexation. In summary, the proposed annexation would adversely impact the orderly and efficient pattern of urban development processes now guaranteed under the "Plan". In addition, the effect of the proposed annexation would adversely impact the economic development, ownership and proposed purchases by separate owners of the Vail Ranch. Further, there are questions that would be raised with regard to the City's General Plan as it impacts the "Plan." This protest is made on behalf of the owners of Vial Ranch whose address is: Mark II Properties 9474 Keamey Villa Road Suite 203 San Diego, California 92126 The current addresses for the subject property, which includes approximately 120 acres of undeveloped land in the County, known as Riverside Assessor's Parcel Numbers ("APN"): 950770005-9 950780012-6 950780021-4 950770006-0 950770003-7 950780022-5 950770007-1 950770004-8 950780023-6 950770008-1 950770009-3 950790011-6 950780001-6 950770010-3 950770013-6 95078000-8 950770011-4 950770014-7 95O780004-9 950770012-5 950780017-1 950780005-0 950780013-7 950790012-7 950780006-1 950780014-8 950790013-8 MEMBER OF COMMERCIAL LAW AFFILIATES, INDEPENDENT BUSINESS AND LtTtGATION LAw FtRt~$ tN ~°RtNC/PAL CITIES WORLDWIDE LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP Gary Thomhill June 25, 1998 Page 4 950780007-2 950780008-3 950780009-4 95O780O1O-4 950780011-5 950780015-9 950790014-9 950780016-0 950790015-0 950780018-2 950790016-1 950780019-3 950780002-7 950780020-3 Sincerely, ~amuel ~. Alhadeff, of ~ LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP SCA:sld cc: Mr. Jerry Swanger C:\DATA\CLIENTSKMDCVAIL\7218.006\THORNILL LETTER. DOC MEMBER OF COMMERCIAL LAW AFFILIATES, INDEPENDENT BUSINESS AND LITIGATION LAW FIRMS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES WORLDWIDE Page I of 9 EXHIBIT "[~" ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK/VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- That certain parcel of land situated in the unincorporated terntory of the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: BEGINNING at an angle point on the existing City of Temecula boundary as described in a document recorded December 9, 1994 as Instrument No. 461244, Official Records of said County hereinafter referred to as LAFCO No. 88-70-1, said point being the intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide) and the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road as shown by Parcel Map 17782 filed in Book 109 of Parcel Maps at Pages 94 and 95 thereof, records of Riverside County, California; Thence hereafter along said City of Temecula boundary and the centerline of said Butterfield Stage Road, South 22056'22" East a distance of 1,017.68 feet more or less, to the southwest comer of said Parcel Map 17782 (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as North 22°56'22" West 1,016.04 feet) also being the northwest comer of Parcel Map 24387 as shown by map on file in Book 164 of Parcel Maps at Pages 5 through 20 thereof, records of Riverside County and the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave southerly and having a radius of 3,000.00 feet, a radial line to said beginning bears North 9°46'2Y' West; Thence easterly along said curve and northerly boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, through a central angle of 1°24'19", an are distance of 73.58 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as a central angle of 1°24'38", and an are distance of 73.86 feet); Thence continuing along the northerly line of said Parcel Map 24387 North 81°37'56" East a distance of 738.45 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 81 °39'22" West a distance of 737.32 feet); Thence leaving said City of Temecula boundary and continuing along the northerly boundary of Parcel Map 24387 North 81°37'56" East a distance of 1,758.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 4,200.00 feet; Thence continuing along the northerly boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 10054'38", an arc distance of 799.79 feet; Kmmr & SwrwA w EXHIBIT "B (continued) Page 2 of 9 Thence continuing along the northerly boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, North 70°43'18" East a distance of 3,539.21 feet to the centerline of Anza Road and the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 1,200.00 feet, a radial line to said beginning bears South 82035'43" West; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, southeasterly along said curve, also being the centerline of Anza Road, through a central angle of 16°29'04", an are distance of 345.25 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, also being the centerline of Anza Road, South 23°53'21" East, a distance of 140.16 feet to the most easterly comer of Parcel 18 of said Parcel Map 24387; Thence leaving the centerline of Anza Road, along the southerly line of said Parcel 18 South 71 ° 11'03" West, a distance of 3,092.94 feet; Thence along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 11°07'17" East a distance of 1,273.78 feet to the most easterly comer of Parcel 14 of said Parcel Map 24387; Thence along the southeasterly boundary of said Parcel 14 South 71 °58'24" West a distance of 1,051.49 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 50032'59" West a distance of 582.84 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 39°52'38" West a distance of 2,189.71 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 29037'22" East a distance of 1,305.54 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 73°10'23" West a distance of 449.26 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 43°57'1Y' West a distance of 773.17 feet to the intersection of the southwesterly line of Pauba Rancho; Thence along said Pauba Rancho line North 46046'24" West a distance of 210.00 feet to the intersection of the southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho; Thence along said southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho South 53°06'24" West a distance of 68.13 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 0°53'12" West a distance of 1,143.59 feet to the southeast comer of Parcel 11 of said EXHIBIT "B (continued) Page 3 of 9 Parcel Map, said southeast comer also being the intersection of the centerline of Woolpert Lane said Parcel 11; Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel I 1 North 88°20'45" West a distance of 1,450.44 feet to the intersection of the southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho; Thence along said southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho South 53o06'24" West a distance of 1,510.57 feet; Thence leaving said Rancho line and continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 00°14'33" East a distance of 1,684.12 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 88°21'31" East a distance of 393.97 feet to the a point on the centerline of Anza Road; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 and said centerline of Anza Road South 88°21'31" East a distance of 530.73 feet; Thence leaving the centerline of said Anza Road and continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 88°21'31" East a distance of 372.65 feet to the northeast comer of Parcel 24 of said Parcel Map 24387; Thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 24 South 1 °I 3'00" East a distance of 1,278.36 feet to the southeast comer thereof; Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 24 North 89°35'41" West a distance of 1,315.76 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 0°20'15" East a distance of 1,306.96 feet to the southeast comer of Parcel 23 of said Parcel Map 24387; Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 23 North 89°24'49" West a distance of 1,319.25 feet; Thence along the easterly line of Parcel 25 of said Parcel Map South 0°39'20" West a distance of 1,335.55 feet to the southeast comer thereof; Thence along the most southerly line of said Parcel 25 and the prolongation thereof North 89o48'50" West a distance of 1,993.66 feet to the comer of said Parcel Map; Thence leaving the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 and continuing North 89048'50" West a distance of 41.'16 feet to the intersection of the centerline of Pala Road; Kmrcr, & EXHIBIT (continueo) Page 4 of 9 Thence along the centerline of said Pala Road North 43°01'34" West a distance of 520.55 feet; Thence continuing along the centerline of Pala Road North 44049'36" West a distance 372.50 feet to a point on the centerline of Deer Hollow Way, said point also described by document referred to herein as LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the southwesterly end of Course No. 82; Hereafter, the following courses are described to follow the boundary of the City of Temecula described by said document referred to herein as LAFCO No. 88- 70-1: Thence along the centerline of Deer Hollow Way also being the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North 42°23'18" East a distance of 2,254.53 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 42°23'59" West a distance of 2,254.57 feet) to the most southerly comer of Parcel 27 of said Parcel Map; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North 24°50'41" West a distance of 832.36 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 24049'53" East a distance of 832.36 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North 30°48'15" West a distance of 1,705.39 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 30o47'27" East a distance of 1,705.39 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North 61002'24" West a distance of 448.25 feet to the most westerly comer of said Parcel Map 24387; Thence continuing North 61°02'24" West along the boundary line of Tract No. 23063-5 as shown by map on file in Book 221 of Maps at Pages 21 through 29, records of said Riverside County, a distance of 169.00 feet (the sum of the previous 2 courses was recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 61 °01'36" East a distance of 617.25 feet) Thence continuing along the boundary line of said Tract No. 23063-5 North 45°33'18" West a distance of 711.38 feet to the most westerly comer of said Tract (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 45°32'22" East a distance of 711.56 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary line of said Tract No. 23063-5 North 45°48'11" East a distance of 415.51 feet to the southwesterly boundary line of Tract No. 23063-4 as shown by map on file in Book 221 of Maps at Pages 12 through 20 thereof, records of said Riverside K Ir, Crl & S rrw^ w EXHIBIT *~ 1~ (continued) Page 5 of 9 County (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 45°48'16" West a distance of 415.45 feet); Thence North 41°21'23" West along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-4 a distance of 442.13 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 41 o 19'56" East a distance of 442.14 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-4 South 45058'28" West a distance of 416.34 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70 as North 45°58'31" East a distance of 416.34 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-4 North 35°27'12" West a distance of 710.25 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 35°26'16" East a distance of 709.90 feet) to a point on the centerline of Wolf Valley Road, said point also being the most southerly comer of Tract 23063-3 on file in Book 220 of Maps at Pages 40 through 56 thereof, records of said Riverside County; Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 35°27'12" West a distance of 88.47 feet (this course was not described in LAFCO No. 88-70-1); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 53034'28" West a distance of 726.59 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 53033'32" East a distance of 726.59 feet); Thence continuing along boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 65016'26" West a distance of 955.73 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 65°15'30" East a distance of 634.63 feet and South 65015'30" East 321.10 feet) to the west line of said Tract No. 23063-3; Thence continuing along boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 4°18'10 East a distance of 173.65 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 4°18'36" West a distance of 173.52 feet) to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave northerly, and having a radius of 1,200.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as 1,200.00 feet), a radial line to said curve bears North 4° 18' 10" East; Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 7°58'45" an arc distance of 167.12 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 7057'33" a distance of 166.70 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 86019'25" East a distance of 119.99 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- I as South 86020'45" West a distance of 120.05 feet); KRIEGER STEWART zxmmw "B" .... (continued) Page 6 of 9 Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 37°24'25" East a distance of 300.15 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 37°27'00" West a distance of 300.09 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 40°04'56" West a distance of 28.05 feet to the comer of Tract No. 23063- 2 as shown by map on file in Book 220 of Maps at Pages 30 through 39 thereof, records of Riverside County; Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North 40004'56" West a distance of411.25 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the sum of the previous 2 courses being South 40003'40" East a distance of 439.27 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North 21°lYl7" East a distance of 171.28 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- 1 as South 21°17'35" West a distance of 171.27 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 20°2Y03" East a distance of 286.33 feet (recorded in I as South 20°22'30" West a distance of 286.32 feet); No. 23063-2 North LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 61 °4Y07" East a distance of 216.05 feet (recorded in I as South 61o44'20" West a distance of 216.03 feet) No. 23063-2 North LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 81 °3Y01" East a distance of 315.81 feet (recorded in I as South 81 °3Y05" West a distance of 315.83 feet); No. 23063-2 North LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 84°39'28" East a distance of 208.85 feet (recorded in I as North 84037'55" West a distance of 208.85 feet); No. 23063-2 South LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 48°39'10" East a distance of 247.87 feet (recorded in 1 as North 48o37'40" West a distance of 247.90 feet); No. 23063-2 South LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 69°39'18" East a distance of 336.15 feet (recorded in 1 as North 69o38'35" West a distance of 336.25 feet); No. 23063-2 South LAFCO No. 88-70- Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 70°44'12" East a distance of 452.93 feet (recorded in 1 as South 70045'05" West a distance of 452.95 feet); No. 23063-2 North LAFCO No. 88-70- EXHIBIT "B (continued) Page 7 of 9 Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 South 67o57'32" East a distance of 532.15 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- 1 as North 67056'54" West a distance of 532.09 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No 23063-2 South 63029'28" East a distance of 282.47 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- 1 as North 63°29'11" West a distance of 282.48 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North 83°15'57" East a distance of 724.10 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- I as South 83o16'35" West a distance of 724.11 feet) to the comer of Tract No. 23063-6 as shown by map on file in Book 222 of Maps at Pages 84 through 98 thereof, records of said Riverside County; Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-6 North 16040'07" West a distance of 885.05 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 16°38'12" East a distance of 885.01 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 North 56041'35" East a distance of 654.72 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- I as North 56°42'21" East a distance of 654.77 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 North 74°59'09" West a distance of 578.70 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 74°58'19" East a distance of 578.70 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 North 53°08'15" West a distance of 36.74 feet to the most southerly comer of Tract No. 23063-1 as shown by map on file in Book 212 of Maps at Pages 49 through 58 thereof, records of said Riverside County; Thence along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 53°08'15" West a distance of 110.10 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the sum of the preceding 2 courses, South 53°07'41" East a distance of 146.84 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-I North 80054'34" West a distance of 250.04 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 80053'58" East a distance of 250.08 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 88020'52" East a distance of 193.02 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- I as South 88021'44" East a distance of 192.98 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 70001'39" West a distance of 199.56 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 70°01'17" East a distance of 199.56 feet); & Sw wA w EXHIBIT "[~ (continued) Page 8 of 9 Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 86o59'58" West a distance of 141.49 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88- 70-1 as South 86°59'50" East a distance of 141.46 feet); Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 0°31'07" West a distance of 305.00 feet to the southwest comer of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 24332 as shown by map on file in Book 156 of Parcel Maps at Pages 98 through 103 thereof, records of said Riverside County; Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel 1 North 0°31'07" West a distance of 263.08 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- 1 as the sum of the preceding 2 course, South 0o30'33" East a distance of 568.12 feet); Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North 21016'25" West a distance of 858.96 feet (recorded in LAFCO 88-70-1 as South 21°15'55" East a distance of 859.04 feet); Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I South 88°17'35" East a distance of 523.72 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70- I as North 88°17'14" West a distance of 523.70 feet); Thence continuing North 63°50'16" East along the westerly line of said Parcel I a distance of 285.06 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 63°5 I'00" West a distance of 285.07 feet); Thence continuing North 46030'39" West along the westerly line of said Parcel 1 a distance of 215.14 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 46030'00" East a distance of 215.19 feet); Thence continuing North 4o04'38" West along the westerly line of said Parcel 1 a distance of 148.52 (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 4°03'15" East a distance of 148.41 feet); Thence continuing North 50o01'58" East along the westerly line of said Parcel I a distance of 360.94 feet to a non-tangent curve, concave northeasterly and having a radius of 1,200.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as having a radius of 1,200.00 feet), a radial line to said beginning bears South 40025'23" West, said curve being the centerline of Redhawk Parkway (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-I as South 50°02'41" West a distance of 361.13 feet); Thence northeasterly along said curve and the centerline of Redhawk Parkway as shown on Parcel Map 27987-1 on file in Book 181 of Parcel Maps at Pages 93 through .98 thereof, records of said Riverside County, through a central angle of 32°38'19" an arc distance of 683.58 feet & Sw w^ w EXHIBIT "[~ (continued) Page 9 of 9 (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-I as southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 32°37'30", a distance of 683.30 feet); Thence continuing along the centerline of said Redhawk Parkway North 16°56'18" West a distance of 34.97 feet to the southeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide) as shown by Tract No. 23172 on file in Book 251 of Maps at Pages 94 through 99 thereof, records of said Riverside County (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 16°56'30" East a distance of 35.00 feet); Thence North 73°22'11" East along said southeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 79 and the northerly line of said Tract No. 23172 a distance of 7,354.49 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 73°23'17" West a distance of 7,355.05 feet) to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Area Contains: 1,978 acres, more or less RAN/kat 836-6A 7/27/98 FIGURE 5 FIGURE 2 ~ ANZA----..~/ ROAD P.O.B. SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY HWY. 79 ~ REDHAWK PARKWAY EXISTING-' CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY ]~~. FIGURE 4 I ~ ,4, .~ ,),',g ~ ~-' (~ DEER HOLLOW WAY I ~ BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD ¢_ A. zA ? ¢' woo. 'r ROAD I LANE i FIGURE 3 Knlr. orn ~;~)TE~'AI~T INQORPO#A?EO 3602 Un,ver~dv Ave · R, vers.~, (~A 92501 · gog-~4-t.000 SCALE: N.T.S. DATE: 7/27/98 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK/VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- DRA~¢N BY: SFM CHECKED BY: RAN W.0.: 836-6 EXI-IIBIT IIBII FI~IRE I OF6 C~ ~ ANZA ROAD EXISTING --~ cffY OF \ TEMECULA ~ BOUNDARY '~.. PARCEL MaP 17782 P.O.B. ~_ BU1-FERFIELD STAGE ROAD SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY HWY. 79 3602 Unrvefs,~¥ Ave · (~,ve~. CA. 92501 · g09-6~4-6900 ;b SCJU.~: l"=tOO0° DATE: 7/27/96 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK/VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- DRA~FN BY:SFM CHECKED By:RAN ~r.O.: 836-6 EXHIBIT u Bu I~GbrR~ 2 OF 6 PARCEL MAP 24-.387 ~ WOOLPE~ LANE 1-26 L20 · · ANZA ROAD L22 · PARCEL 24- '" L24 ~ADT ~ SCAI,~h 1'= 1000' DAT~: 7/27/98 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK[VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- DRAWN BY: 5FM CHECKED BY: RAN W.0.: 836-6 EXHIBIT II B II I~GUP~ 3 OF 6 L46 TRACT 23063-3 TRACT 23063-4 TRACT 25063-5 PARCEL MAP 24387 ~[x~. 12-51.-01 lot ~ PALA ROAD EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY ¢~~°29 \ \ PARCEL 27 ~/ PARCEL MAP 24387 ~ DEER HOLLOW WAY PARCEL 25 L28 L26 KDgC~J~ ~T!~WAmT 3602 Un,vet'~l¥ Ave · Rive,ts~e. CA 92501 · 909-684-6900 SCALE: t"=tOO0' DATE: 7/27/98 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION OF REDHAI~K/VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- DRA~FN BY:SFM CHECKED BY:RAN W.O.: 836-6 EXHIBIT II B II fiGUR~ 4 OF ( '- ~ BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY HWY. 79 EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY 1tr Ex~ 12-~1-01 . ~'~TEVAI~T 3602 Unl~t~t¥ Ave- R,ve~mde. CA 92501 ~ SCAL~: l"=t000' DAT~: 7/27/98 TRACT 2,3172 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK/VAiL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA li B I! LAFCO 98- DRAWN By:SFM CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 836-6 fiE:~ 5 0F 6 LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 L30 L31 L32 L33 L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L$9 DIRECTION S22'56'22"E N81'37'56"E N81'37'56"E N70'43' 18"E S23'53'21 "E S71'11 '03"W S11'07'17"E S71'58'24"W S50°32'59"W S$9'52'38"W S29'37'22"E 573' 10'23"W S43'57'13"W N46'46'24"W S53'06'24"W · S00'53' 12"W N88°20'45"W S53'06'24"W $00' 1 4'33"E S88'21 '31 "E S88'21 '31 "E $88'21 '31 "E S01'13'00"E N89'35'41 "W S00'20' 15"E N89'24'49"W S00'39'20"W N89'48'50"W N89'48'50"W N43°01 '34"W N44'49'36"W N42'23' 18"E N24'50'41 "W N30' 48' 15"W N61'O2'24"W N61'O2'24"W N45'33' 18"W N45'48'11 "E N41'21 '23"W COURSE DISTANCE 1017.68' 738.45' 1758.87' 3539.21' 140.16' 5092.94' 1273.78' 1051.49' 582.84' 2189.71' 1305.54' 449.26' 773.17' 210.00' 68.13' 1143.59' 1450.44' 1510.57' 1684.12' 395.97' 530.73' 372.65' 1278.36' 1315.76' 1306.96' 1319.25' 1335.55' 1993.66' 41.16' 520.55' 372.50' 2254.53' 832.36' 1705.39' 448.25' 169.00' 711.38' 415.51' 442.13' CURVE SHEET Kmr. cm %TE~'Ai~T LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE L40 S45'58'28"W 416.54' L41 N35'27' 12"W 710.25' L42 N35'27'12"W 88.47' L43 N53'34'28"W 726.59' L44 N65'16'26"W 955.75' L45 NO4'18'lO"E 175.65' L46 N86'19'25"E 119.99' L47 N37'24'25"E 300.15' L48 N40'O4'56"W 28.05' L49 N40°O4'56"W 411.25' L50 N21'13'17"E 171.28' L51 N20°23'O3"E 286.35' L52 N61'43'O7"E 216.05' L53 N81'33'Ol"E 315.81' 1.54 S84°39'28"E 208.85' L55 S48'$9' 10"E 247.87' L56 S69'39'18"E 556.15' L57 N70'44' 12"E 452.93' L58 S67'57'32"E 532.15' L59 S63'29'28"E 282.47' L60 N83'15'57"E 724.10' L61 N16'40'07"W 885.05' L62 N56'41 '35"E 654.72' L63 N74'59'O9"W 578.70' L64 N55'OS'lS"W 56.74' L65 N53'08'15"W 110.10' L66 N80'54'34"W 250.04' L67 N88'20'52"E 195.02' L68 N70'O!'39"W 199.56' L69 N86'59'58"W 141,49' L70 N00'31 '07"W 505.00' L71 N00'31 '07"W 263.08' L72 N21'16'25"W 858.96' L73 S88'17'$5"E 525.72' L74 N63'50' 16"E 285.06' L75 N46'30'39"W 215.14' L76 NO4'O4'38"W 1 48.52' L77 N50'01 '58"E 560.94' L78 N16'56'18"W 34.97' L7g N73'22' 11 "E 7354.49' RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 3000.00' 73.58' 01 °24' 19" C2 4200.00' 799.79' 10'54'38" C3 1200.00' 545.25' 16'29'04" C4 1200.00' 167.12' 07°58'45" C5 1200.00' 683.58' 32'38' 19" SCALE: N/A DAT~: 7/27/98 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK/VAIL RANCH TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA LAFCO 98- DRAWN BY: SFM CHECKED BY: RAN W.O.: .( E I2- t-O . EXHIBI? II B II 836-6 fiGUP, J: 6 OF , ITEM 22 APPROV;~dJL~, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~?~:~/ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City.,Maqager j Gary Thornhill, ~omrhunity Development Director July 28, 1998 Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98o0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) PREPARED BY: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments Development Code and Zoning Map); 2. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914- 811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-004 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE); and 3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-1 AND L-2 ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, RELOCATING THE MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS FROM SECTION 17.24.050.A. TO SECTION 17.24.040.G.3 (ADDED), REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA98.CC1 7/20/98 Idb I MODIFYING SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811 - 003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914- 812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-004 FROM VI. (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-090-038 AND 921-090- 039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY BACKGROUND: Staff has identified that several amendments need to made to the City's Zoning Map and Development Code. Changes to the Zoning Map will necessitate modifications to the General Plan Land Use Map prior to the approval of any changes to the City's Zoning Map. The Planning Commission heard the proposed amendments at their May 20, 1998. The Commission approved the remaining amendments by a 4-0 vote (unanimous). The Commission removed the Salkind amendment (located on Winchester Road near Murrieta Hot Springs Road) from the proposals for further analysis. Upon further review, the property owner has opted to commence proceedings with the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to detach from the City of Temecula. It is anticipated that the detachment Resolution will be before the Council at their first meeting in August. Staff also has removed the recommendations to modify landscape requirements for auto dealerships, adding Section 17.08.050.S. (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) to the Development Code from this current proposal. The Commission originally heard proposed language at their May 20, 1998 hearing. The Commission concurred with the language proposed by staff. Unfortunately, staff was unable to discuss the proposed modifications in detail with the auto dealers until after the Commission hearing had occurred. After the Commission action, staff met several time with the auto dealers. As a result of these meetings, additional modifications are now recommended to the proposed Section 17.08.0§0.S. This item has been assigned a new Planning Application number and will be going back before the Planning Commission at their August 5, 1998 hearing. It will ultimately be brought forward for the Council's consideration upon review by the Planning Commission. Below is a brief discussion of the proposed amendments. R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CC1 7/20/95 ldb 2 ANALYSIS: Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Amendments Calle Katefine These parcels are recommended to be re-designated from VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2- .4 dwelling units/acre) to Low-Medium Density Residential LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units/acre) to be consistent with existing lot sizes on both the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map. Spanos Panhandle This area is located on the east side of Margarita Road, south of North General Kearny, and is currently designated High Density Residential (H) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.E). It is recommended to be re-designated to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) to be more consistent with the adjacent properties. Rancho High/ands/Villa Hermosa This area is located on the west side of Ynez Road, immediately north of Tierra Vista Road and is identified as SP - Specific Plan (a part of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan) on the City's Zoning Map. This is in conflict with that Specific Plan which identifies it as "Not A Part." Staff recommends this portion be removed from the SP designation and re-designated to High Density Residential (H) to be consistent with the existing land use. Specific Plan Numbers Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code assigns numbers (SP-1 through SP-9) to the various Specific Plans within the City. This modification to the Zoning Map will result in assigning these numbers to the Specific Plan areas on the Map. Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Section 17. 16.070 - Approved Specific Plans Section 17.16.070 of the Development Code lists the specific plans which have been approved by the City and which are designated on the City's Zoning Map as a specific plan. SP-1 is listed in this Section as the Pala Village Specific Plan; however, the City's Zoning Map does not reflect this. Staff conducted some research and determined that the County of Riverside had removed the specific plan designation prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. As a result, staff recommends that the Pala Village Specific Plan be deleted from Section 17.16.070 and the remaining Specific Plans be re-numbered accordingly. Yard Requirements for Shopping Centers Interior side yard requirements contained in Table 17.08.040.A (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) and 17.08.040.B (Development Standards Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Development on a Separate Lot) for commercial R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCI 7/20/98 klb 3 developments are recommended to be modified to allow for zero lot lines in the NC, CC, HT and SC. Heights of Accessory Structures It is recommended that Section 17.06.050.D.2 of the Development Code be amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-1 and L-2 zones." Adding Construction Tra#ers to Table 17.06.030 (Use Regulations - Residential) Trailers are often used in residential areas in conjunction with the construction of single-family and multi-family residences. They are not listed as a permitted use in Table 17.06.030. Staff recommends that they be a permitted use in all residential zones under the nonresidential heading. This would require that construction trailers receive an Administrative Development Plan from the Planning Department prior to their use. This would give the Planning Department the ability to condition the project (i.e., on-site mitigation, time limits, bonding, etc.). Staff met with a local developer after the Commission meeting who expressed concerns over regulating construction trailers in areas where there is no adjacent development or in specific plan areas. After considering this developer's input, staff is recommending that the following footnote be added to Table 17.06.030: "5. The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the Construction Trailer will not have an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses." Vehicle Side- Yard Storage Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Districts) reads as follows: In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property." Staff recommends that additional language be included at the end of this sentence which reads as follows: "...and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." It is staff's belief that this create a better streetscape, as opposed to two driveways on the same property frontage. Motorcycle Parking Space Dimensions Staff recommends that the dimensions for motorcycle spaces called out in the last sentence of Section 17.24.050.A. be moved to Section 17.24.040.G.3 for clarity. Wheel Stops Section 17.24.050 (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) provides standards for the design of off-street parking facilities. Staff has determined that there is a need to require wheel stops in certain instances. Staff recommends the Section 17.24.050.K. be added to the Development Code to read as follows: "Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right-of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." R:\STAFFRPT\109PA98.CCI 7/20198 klb 4 Correspondence Received Staff received a letter from a resident of Villa Hermosa Condominiums requesting that this property be re-zoned from residential to commercial due to its proximity to other commercial uses and the increased noise from Ynez Road. This letter has been included as Attachment No. 5 to this Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments 2. 3. 4. 5. Resolution No. 98- - Page 6 Ordinance No. 98- - Page 10 Planning Commission Staff Report (May 20, 1998) - Page 16 Planning Commission Minutes (May 20, 1998) - Page 17 Correspondence Received - Page 18 R:\STAFFRPT~I09PA98.CCI 7/20/98 Idb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:\STAFFRPT\109PA98.CCI 7/20/95 ldb 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-004 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWl*J~LING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heating, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments); and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on July 14, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCI 7/20/98 klb 7 A. That Section 65350 of the Government Code provides for the preparation, adoption and amendment of general plans and their elements; B. That there is a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Resolution complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. The General Plan Land Use Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Properties identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-8114304, 914-8114305, 914-811-006, 914-8114307, 914-812-001,914-812-002, 914-812-003 and 914-812-004 shall be amended from VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2-.4 dwelling units per acre) to LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units per acre). Section 3. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CC1 7/20/98 klb ~ this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula ~ day of , 199_. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98-t was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: C OUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\$TAFFRPT\I09PA98.CC1 7~20~98 klb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCI 7/20/98 itlb 1 0 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COLrNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-1 AND L-2 ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, RELOCATING THE MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS FROM SECTION 17.24.050.A. TO SECTION 17.24.040.G.3 (ADDED), REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, MODIFYING SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-004 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921- 090-038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY. WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and the Zoning Map; R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCl 7/21/98 klb 1 1 WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on July 14, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Seclion 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and Go ordinances. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local Section 2. Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 SP-5 SP-6 SP-7 SP-8 Roripaugh Estates Rancho Highlands Margarita Village Paloma del Sol Old Town Campos Verdes Temecula Regional Center Westside Specific Plan" R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCI 7/21/98 klb '1 2 Section 3. Tables 17.08.040.A. (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) ana 17.08.040.B (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for a Development on a Separate Lot) of the Development Code are hereby amended to have a zero (0) foot interior side yard requirement for the NC, CC, HT, SC and PO land use designations. Section 4. Section 17.06.050.D.2 (Accessory Structures and Uses) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-1 and L-2 zones." Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Table - Residential Districts) of the Development Code is hereby amended include construction trailers as a permitted use in all residential zones, under the non-residential subsection of Table 17.06.030. Section 6. Table 17.06.030: of the Development Code is hereby amended to include Footnote No. 5 to read as follows: "5. The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the Construction Trailer will not have an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses." Section 7. Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Standards) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." Section 8. Section 17.24.040.G.3 (Motorcycle Spaces) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall have a minimum dimension of at least four (4) feet in width and seven (7) feet in length and shall be accessed by a drive aisle at least (8) feet in width. Section 9. The last sentence of Section 17.24.050.A (Parking Space Dimensions) of the Development Code which reads as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall have a minimum dimension of at least four (4) feet in width and seven (7) feet in length and shall be accessed by a drive aisle at least (8) feet in width" is hereby deleted. Section 10. Section 17.24.050.K (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right- of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." Section 11. l::.nvironmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. R:\STAFFRFl'\I09PA98.CCI 7/21/98 klb ] 3 Section 12. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. 199__. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of , Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:~STAFFRPT~109PA98.CC1 7/21/98 klb 'l 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 199__, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT\109PA98.CCI 7/21198 lob '] ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 20, 1998 R:~STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCl 7/20/98 ldb 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager May 20, 1998 Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: R;COMM;ND TH; CITY COUNCIl ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending that the City Council approve an Resolution entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, Amending the City's General Plan Land Use Map for Properties Identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914- 811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 and 914-812-003 from VL (Very-low Density Residential .2-.4 Dwelling Units per Acre) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140- 007 from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 Dwelling Units per Acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial)" based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report; and ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, Amending Portions of the City's Development Code Pertaining to Landscape Requirements for Automobile Dealerships, Side Yard Requirements for Shopping Centers, Heights of Accessory Structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and Lm Zones, Regulations for Temporary Construction R:~TAF'FRP'~I09PA98.PCI 5/8/98 mf Trailers in Residential Zones, Clarifying Side Yard Storage for Vehicles, Motorcycle Parking Space Dimensions, Requirements for Wheel Stops in Commercial Zones, modifying Section 17.16.070 of the Development Code, deleting Pala Village from the list of Specific Plans, and amending the Zoning Map for Properties Identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 and 914-812-003 from VL (Very-low Density Residential .2-.4 Dwelling Units per Acre) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007 from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 Dwelling Units per Acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial), Assessor's Parcel Numbers 921-090- 038 and 921-090-039) from H (High Density Residential) to LM (Low-medium Density Residential 3-6 Dwelling Units per Acre), Assessor's Parcel Numbers 944-331-001 Through 944-331-025) from SP - Specific Plan (A Part of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan) to H (High Density Residential 13-20 Dwelling Units per Acre) and Re- assigning Numbers (SP-1 Through SP-8) to the Various Specific Plans Within the City" based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report BACKGROUND Staff has determined that there are items which need to be clarified in the City's General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. The recommendations below will rectify existing errors, and provide any needed clarification and/or adjustment resulting from the practical application of the General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. DISCUSSION Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Amendments Staff has identified that several amendments need to made to the City's Zoning Map. These will necessitate modifications to the General Plan Land Use Plan prior to the approval of any changes to the City's Zoning Map. These are described in detail below: Calle Katefine This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001 through 914-811-007 and 914-812-001 through 914-812-004), which is located at the northern terminus of Calle Katerine is identified as Very Low Density Residential (VL) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.B). This area has been mistakenly designated as part of the Nicolas Valley special study area. The area is currently subdivided into standard subdivision sized residential lots. Staff recommends this portion be re-designated to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) to be consistent with existing lot sizes. The General Plan Land Use Map identifies this area as VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2-.4 dwelling units/acre). Staff recommends the General Plan Land Use Plan be R:~STAFFRFl%I09PA9S.PCI ~ mf 2 amended to LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units/acre - reference Attachment No. 4.A). Salkind This area (Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007), which is located on the northwest side of Winchester Road at the City's limit is identified as Medium Density Residential (M) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4.D). The property has frontage on Winchester Road and is not a part of the Winchester Creek development. This property was inadvertently split in half by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) when the City incorporated. The other half of the property, which is located within the unincorporated portion of Riverside County, is commercially zoned. Staff recommends that the zoning be re-designated to Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) to reflect the current land use of the rest of the parcel and because adequate buffering and separation distance from the existing residences. The General Plan Land Use Map identifies this area as M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 dwelling units/acre). Staff recommends the General Plan Land Use Plan be amended to HTC (Highway/Tourist Commercial - reference Attachment No. 4.C). Spanos Panhandle This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 921-090-038 and 921-090-039), which is located on the east side of Margarita Road, south of North General Kearny, is currently designated High Density Residential (H) on the City's Zoning Ma13 (reference Attachment No. 4.E). This property has been transferred to the owner to the north through a Lot Line Adjustment and has been included in Tentative Tract Map No. 28553. Staff recommends this portion be re-designated to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) to be more consistent with the immediately adjacent property. Due to the scale of the General Plan Land Use Plan, no amendment is required. Rancho Highlands/Villa Hermosa This area (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 944-331-001 through 944-331-025), which is located on the west side of Ynez Road, immediately north of Tierra Vista Road, is identified as SP - Specific Plan (a part of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan) on the City's Zoning Map (reference Attachment No. 4. F). This is conflict with that Specific Plan which identifies it as "Not A Part." Staff recommends this portion be removed from the SP designation and re-designated to High Density Residential (H) to be consistent with the existing land use. Due to the scale of the General Plan Land Use Plan, no amendment is required. ' Specific Plan Numbers Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code assigns numbers (SP-1 through SP-9) to the various Specific Plans within the City. This modification to the Zoning Map will result in assigning these numbers to the Specific Plan areas on the Map (reference Attachment No. 4.G). No General Plan Amendment is required. R'~TAFFRP~I09PA9g.PCI 5/g/98 mf ~ Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Section 17. 16.070 - Approved Specific Plans Section 17.16.070 of the Development Code lists the specific plans which have been approved by the City and which are designated on the City's Zoning Map as a specific plan. SP-1 is listed in this Section as the Pala Village Specific Plan; however, the City's Zoning Map does not reflect this. Staff conducted some research and determined that the County of Riverside had removed the specific plan designation prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. As a result, staff recommends that the Pala Village Specific Plan be deleted from Section 17.16.070 and the remaining Specific Plans be re-numbered accordingly. Landscape Requirements for Automobile Dealerships The City's Development Code encourages automobile dealerships to be located in the Service Commercial (SC) zone. The minimum landscaping requirement in this zone is twenty percent (20%). Staff is concerned that automobile dealerships have unique requirements when it come to landscaping their sites because they require large outdoor display areas. This large display area dictates a proportionally larger amount of landscaped area than a business that typically relies on interior display. It is staff's opinion that the critical areas which shall be landscaped for auto dealerships are: the perimeter (especially the streetscape and any buffering with adjacent uses), the end of drive lanes in display areas and adjacent to buildings which are accessed by the public. Staff recommends that Section 17.08.050.S. (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) be added to the Development Code which would include the following language: Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new automobi'le dealerships: ao Display areas: a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape island shall be required at the end of all display area lanes. A two foot strip, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall have automatic irrigation. bo Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall have a minimum twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer. Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer. All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape buffer. R:~STAFFRPT~IO~PAgg,PCI 5/g/~g ~ 4 eo The Community Development Director may increase the above mentioned minimum landscape buffering requirements if it is determined that it is necessary to mitigate impacts from the project. All employee and customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the Development Code. Buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade. Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses. Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner discussed above. Yard Requirements for Shopping Centers Staff has determined that interior side yard requirements contained in Table 17.08.040.A (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) and 17.08.040.B (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Development on a Separate Lot) for commercial developments should be modified. Many, if not most commercial developments cannot meet the 10 foot requirement due to current subdivision practices for commercial projects which often involves zero lot lines. Staff recommends that the interior side yard requirement be reduced to zero (0) for the NC, CC, HT and SC zones to allow maximum flexibility for existing and future developments for both Tables 17.08.040.A and 17.08.040.B. Heights of Accessory Structures Section 17.06.050.D of the Development Code allows a maximum height of sixteen feet for accessory structures in residential zones. This height restriction has recently been questioned by residents who wish to construct a barn as an accessory structure on a 2 ½ acre property. Upon further evaluation, the 16 foot height requirement does not seem reasonable for properties one acre in size or larger. As a result, staff recommends that Section 17.06.050.D.2 be amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and L-2 zones" Adding Construction Trailers to Table 17.06.030 (Use Regulations - Residential) Trailers are often used in residential areas in conjunction with the construction of single-family and multi-family residences. They are not listed as a permitted use in Table 17.06.030. Staff recommends that they be a permitted use in all residential zones under the nonresidential heading. This would require that construction trailers receive an Administrative Development R:~STAFFRFr~I09PA911.PCI 5/~/9~ mf ~ Plan from the Planning Department prior to their use. This would give the Planning Department better ability to condition the project (i.e., on-site mitigation, time limits, bonding, etc.). Vehicle Side-Yard Storage Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Districts) reads as follows: In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property." Staff recommends that additional language be included at the end of this sentence which reads as follows: "...and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." It is staff's belief that this create a better streetscape, as opposed to two driveways on the same property frontage. Motorcycle Parking Space Dimensions Section 17.24.040.G. of the Development Code pertains to motorcycle parking requirements. While the Code calls out the requirements and credit for provisions of motorcycle parking spaces, the Code is silent as to the dimensions for the motorcycle parking spaces. Based upon research conducted on this matter, staff recommends that Section 17.24.040.G. be expanded to include subsection 3 and read as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet in length and three (3) feet four (4) inches in width." Wheel Stops Section 17.24.050 (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) provides standards for the design of off-street parking facilities. Staff has determined that there is a need to require wheel stops in certain instances. Staff recommends the Section 17.24.050.K. be added to the Development Code to read as follows: ~Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right-of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code Amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. No mitigation measures are required. SUMMARY Staff has determined that there are items which need to be clarified in the City's General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. The amendments will rectify existing errors, and provide clarification to various components of the General Plan, Zoning Map and Development Code. R:kSTAFFRP~I09PA98.PCI 5/s/9g mf 6 Attachments: Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A. Resolution No. 98-~ - Blue Page 11 Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 15 Exhibit A. Ordinance No. 98- - Blue Page 19 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 25 Exhibits - Blue Page 33 R:~TAFFRPT~109PAgg.PC! 5/11/98 mf 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~STAFFRPT~109PA9g. PCI ~/~/9~ mf 8 ATrACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA', CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTI. F~;o AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914.811-003, 914.811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDFAVIIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RF~ID~L 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL)" WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN RESOLI. rrlON ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914- 812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL R:~STAFFRF~I09PA98.PCI 5/8/98 ml' 9 NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL)" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1998. Marcia Slaven, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission: AYF. S: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA98.PCI 5/8/9~ mf 10 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA9~.PCI 5/8/98 mf I I EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIIflED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914.811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914.812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914.812-00~ FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESH)ENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MI~IUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL) WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WI~,EAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (Genexal Plan Amendments), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public heating as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments); and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments), on , at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; R:~STAFFRPl~I09PA98.PC1 $/8/98 mf 12 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65350 of the Govemment Code provides for the preparation, adoption and amendment of general plans and their elements; B. That there is a need to amend the City's General Plan l_and Use Plan to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Resolution complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. The General Plan Land Use Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Properties identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001,914-812- 002,914-812-003 and 914-812-003 shall be amended from VL (Very-Low Density Residential .2- .4 dwelling units per acre) to LM (Low-Medium Density Residential 3-6 dwelling units per acre). B. Property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 911-140-007 shall be amended from M (Medium Density Residential 7-12 dwelling units per acre) to HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial). Section 3. l::.nvironmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. .qevembility. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA.OS.PCI 5/8/98 mf 13 this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula ~ day of ,199_. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,199_, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:~TAFFRPT~I09PA9~.PCI 5/8/98 mf 14 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMY_aNT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LEqT OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811- 004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914- 812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-090- 038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY" R:~TAFFRPT~I09PA9S.PCI ~/g/9S ~r 16 WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF 'iT. MECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONF~, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDF_2qTWIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811- 003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914- 812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 7-12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921- 090-038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW- Ml~ DENSITY REqIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELI.ING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. R:~STAFFRFIM09PA9g. PCI 5/8/98 mf 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1998. Marcia Slaven, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~TAFFRP'~109PA9g. PCI 5/gDg mf 1 8 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:~STAFFRP~I0~PA~.PCl $/8/~8 n~ 19 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFO~, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2 AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDEN'I'Ik'~ AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811- 001,914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914- 811-006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 5-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-140-007 FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY REqlDENTIAL 7- 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HTC (HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 921-090-038 AND 921-090-039) FROM H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-.025) FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND ASSIGNING NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-9) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY. WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; R:~TAFFRP'I~I09PA95.PGI ~1S/9S raf 20 WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); and WI-IEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map), on , at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and ordinances. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local Section 2. Section 17.16.070 (Approved Specific Plans) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "SP-1 Roripaugh Estates SP-2 Rancho Highlands SP-3 Margarita Village SP-4 Paloma del Sol SP-5 Old Town R:~qTAFFRP~I09PA98.PC1 5/8/98 mf 2 1 SP-6 SP-7 SP-8 Campos Verdes Temecula Regional Center Westside Specific Plan" Section 2. Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) is hereby added to the Development Code and reads as follows: "1. Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new automobile dealerships: a. Display areas: a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape island shall be required at the end of all display area lanes. A two foot strip, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall have automatic irrigation. be Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall have a minimum twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer. Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer. All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape buffer. The Community Development Director may increase the above mentioned minimum landscape buffering requirements if it is determined that it is necessary to mitigate impacts from the project. fo All employee and customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the Development Code. Buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade. Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses. RSST~I09PA98.PCI S/8/~8 mf 22 Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner discussed above." Section 3. Tables 17.08.040.A. (Development Standards Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts for Developments within Planned Shopping Centers or Industrial/Business Parks) and 17.08.040.B (Development Standards - Commercial/Office/Induslrial Districts for a Development on a Separate Lo0 of the Development Code are hereby amended to have a zero (0) foot interior side yard requirement for the NC, CC, HT, SC and PO land use designations. Section 4. Section 17.06.050.D.2 (Accessory Structures and Uses) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Height. Accessory structures shall not exceed the maximum height allowed for the zone, if located in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2 and L-2 zones." Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Table - Residential Districts) of the Development Code is hereby amended include construction trailers as a permitted use in all residential zones, under the non-residential subsection of Table 17.06.030. Section 6. Footnote No. 3 of Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Standards) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular access to the rear of the property and shall be located on the same side as the driveway." Section 7. Section 17.24.040.G.3 (Motorcycle Spaces) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Motorcycle spaces shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet in length and three (3) feet four (4) inches in width." Section 8. Section 17.24.050.K (Parking Facility Layout and Dimensions) of the Development Code is hereby added to read as follows: "Wheel Stops. Securely fixed wheel stops, at least six (6) inches in height shall be placed to prevent vehicles from overhanging a public right-of-way, a pedestrian walkway which would not meet handicapped accessibility requirements, and adjacent to walls, fences and buildings." Section 9. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 10. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. R:~STAFFRP~I09PA98.PCI $/8/95 mf 23 Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 199t, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOF_~: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk R:~qT~I09PA98.PCI 5/~/98 nff 24 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:~TAFFRPT~I09PA9S.PCI 5/g/~8 mf 2~ CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Project Title: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: Zoning: Description of Project: Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA9$-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400 City-wide Same as No. 2 Multiple designations Multiple designations Several clean-up amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan and Zoning Map and amendments to the Development Code to modify landscape requirements for automobile dealerships, modify side yard requirements for shopping centers, clarify the heights of accessory structures m the I-IR, VL, L- 1, L-2 and LM zones, adding regulations for temporary construction trailers m residential zones, clarifying side yard storage for vehicles, adding motorcycle parking space dimensions, and adding a requirement for wheel stops in commercial zones Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: N/A Other public agencies whose approval is required: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: R:~STAFFRP~I09PAgS.PCI 5/8/98 nff 26 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Po~-mially Unless Lesa Than Si~nific. a~t IMiug, ation $~n~nt No The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards [ ] Population and Homing [ ] Noise [ ] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services [ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance [X] None DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signature Date Printed Name R:~TAFFRFIM09PAgg. PCI 5/g/98 mf 27 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFOI~Y-.ATION SOURCES 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project7 e. Be incompatible with existing land use m the vicinity? d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving." a. Fault rupture? b. Seismic ground shaking? Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d. Seiehe, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e. Landslides or mudflows? f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or fill? g. Subsidence of the land? h. Expansive soils? I. Unique geologic or physical features? Potentially Significant Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] Pot~ntiMly Unle~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] L~ Tl~! Impact [] [] [) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [) NO (x] [x] IX] IX] IX] [x3 IX3 [~ IX3 [~ 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA98.PCl 5/g/gg nff 28 ISSD-ES AND Stn'VOR~G n4vom~aw~o~ sotmc£s rate and mount of surface runoff? b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c. Discharge imo surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h. Impacts to groundwater quality? I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b. Expose sensitive reeeptors to pollutants? c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d. Create objectionable odors? TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety fi'om design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous totersection or incompatible uses)? c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? e Si~mfie, mt Imp~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Po~mtislJy Si~,lific~nt Unless lnco~x~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] (] [] [] [] [] Less Than Sisnd'~cam lmjMct [] [] [] [] [) [] [] [] [] [] [) (] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 No IX] [x] ix] ix] IX] [x] [x} [x] IX] IX] [x] [x] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] R:kSTAFFRP~I09PA95.PCl 5/8/98 mf 29 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially S~ificmt Imp~a Pot~nually S~grUficmt Unless Mitigauon Incorpomed Le~s Th~ No f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemat/ve transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic finpacts? 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not l/mired to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage U'ees)? c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the propos~!: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? b.Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [1 [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [i [] t] [] [] [] [] IX] IX] IX] ix] IX] [x] IX] IX] IX] IX] IX] The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? Ino'ease fwe hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX] IX] IX] RASTAFFRPTq09PA9~.PCI 5/8/98 mf 30 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOLACES Potentially Significam Impact Potentially S~gnificant Unles~ Mmsatmn l~corpor~d Les~ Than S~mficam lmp~ct No 10. ]NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase m existing noise levels7 b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e. Other governmental services? 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? Locnl or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste disposal? g. Local or reffional water supplies? [l [1 [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [1 [3 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [1 [] [] [1 [a ix] IX] [x] IX] ix] [x] [~ [~ 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c. Create light or glare? 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? [1 [1 [l [] [l [l [1 [1 [1 [1 [l [] R:~STAPFRPT~109PA9S.PCl .~8/~! mf 3 1 b. Disturb archaeological resources? c. Affect historical resources? d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect umque ethnic cultural values? e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). [] [1 [1 [~ [1 [l [1 [~ [] [l [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ [] [] [] [~ Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None. [] [] [] [~ DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Environmental Study, the proposed Amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Map, the Development Code and the Zoning Map will not have an impact to the environment in the following are~: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems, Water, Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities and Servic~ Systems, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation. No mitigation measures will be required. R:~STAFFRPT~I09PA98.PCI $/8/95 mf 32 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS R:~STAFl~J~109PA98.PC! 5/8/98 mf ~ CITY OF TEMECULA BP M PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0170 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT A CALLE KATERINE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT B CALLE KATERINE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA H CC P N¢ '~/" ..~ M M PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0170 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) EXHmlT C SALKINDS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 SALKINDS ./ CITY OF TEMECULA SP 4. 4. 4' ,+ 4. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT E SPANOS PANHANDLE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT F RANCHO HIGHLANDS/VILLA HERMOSA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP-1 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP SP-2 ~ PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA ::::::::::::::::::::::: SP-3 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA '..'.' 5';:-' SP-4 DE 5' PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHmIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA ~P SP-7 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA SP-8 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0109 (ZONING AMENDMENT) EXHIBIT G SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 20, 1998 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1998 R:\$TAFFRPT\I09PA98.CC1 7/20/98 klb '~ 7 Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments} and Plannin~j Applicat~4~ PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Mal~} Request to approve several clean-up amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan and Zoning Map and amendments to the Development Code to modify landscape requirements for automobile dealerships, modify side yard requirements for shopping centers, clarify the heights of accessory structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2, and LM zones, adding regulations for temporary construction trailers in residential zones clarifying side yard storage for vehicles, adding motorcycle parking space dimensions, and adding a requirements for wheel stops in commercial zones. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Commissioner Miller noted that he would be abstaining with regard to the Spanos Panhandle property. By way of a zoning map, Associate Planner Fagan presented a detailed overview of the staff report (as per agenda material) and provided additional clarification with regard to the Salkind property (currently zoned as Medium Density Residential) and commented on staff's recommendation to zone the property as Highway-Tourist Commercial versus Service Commercial because of the adjacent residential developments. Further elaborating on his situation, Mr. Sonny Salkind, 339575 Glen Oaks Road, advised that he has been the owner of the property for the past 28 years; that one piece of his property has been bifurcated by the City/County line, zoning the County portion as CPS which is a mixture of Highway-Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC); that the Service Commercial Zone would be more compatible with the County's CPS zone; that although he has an existing entitlement on the property for the use of a drive-through restaurant, no permits have been pulled; and that the HTC zone would be limiting the permitted uses of his property. In response to the Commission, Mr. Salkind voiced no objection to a continuance with regard to his property in order for staff to readdress the issue with him. In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that she had received a phone call from Mr. Dick Kennedy requesting a continuance on behalf of Mr. Atwood with regard to the Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards. Ms. Ubnoske noted that Mr. Kennedy was not specific as to the concerns and that she had requested that a letter be submitted requesting the continuance and stated that she had not received such a letter. It was noted that she and Associate Planner Fagan will be meeting with the individuals tomorrow in order to address any concerns. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue this matter in order to permit Mr. Atwood to relay his concerns with regard to the Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards. After some additional discussion and due to the lack of a second, this motion was withdrawn by Mr. Miller. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the upcoming General Motors request (designed comply with the Development Code Amendments) may be reviewed prior to any action being taken on the Development Code Amendments and, therefore, the proposed applicant would be inconsistent with the current Development Code. In order to address this issue, Planning Manager Ubnoske, as per Attorney Curley, noted that the proposed applicant may submit plans under the existing Development Code and that approval may be granted with the imposition of the following condition: ... subject to and contingent upon the City approving the amendment to the Development Code which will be requiring less landscaping. Ms. Ubnoske noted that the Commission may act on the matter this evening, noting that Mr. Kennedy and/or Mr. Atwood would still have the opportunity to address their concerns with the City Council. Clarifying that it would not be the City's intent to retrofit automobile dealership facilities which may propose minor changes, Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested the addition of specific language clarifying that the proposed standards would solely pertain to new construction and would not affect expansions of existing facilities. Providing additional clarification with regard to section g. of the Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards (buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade), Associate Planner Fagan noted that the intent of this section was to provide more landscaping around the access points to the public not to the service bays, loading doors, etc. Following additional discussion with regard to this section, it was the consensus of the Commission that the section be amended as follows: The showroom portion/main sales building which is accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade. In order to further clarify this amendment, it was suggested by Planning Manager Ubnoske that a graphic be attached. Because the proposed landscape standards for automobile dealerships references a 20' landscape buffer, it was the consensus of the Commission to amend the existing City Design Guidelines from 15' to 20' with regard to the landscaping buffer in order to eliminate the potential of a conflict. In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Associate Planner Fagan reviewed the added provision with regard to construction trailers, advising that a minor development plan would be required in order to give the Planning Department the ability to impose some conditions with regard to these trailers. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing; to adopt Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-Q1 70 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); to adopt Resolution No. 98-013; and to adopt Resolution No. PC 98-014, deleting the Salkind property and continuing that item to the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1998. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED R:\STAFFRPT\I09PA98.CCI 7/20/98 klb 18 July 16, 1998 City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, Ca. 92589 Attn: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner Re: City Zoning Map Dear Mr. Fagan, Per our phone conversation on July 15, 1998 my recommendation would be to rezone this location to R3 High Density Commercial. Commercial would be more consistent with the other commercial development in close proximity to this complex. The sources of environmental noise must be considered in your analysis which is not conducive to residential living. The noise element both near and long term from the levels of growth and traffic activity has become a Health and Safety issue pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1973. The location of this complex is deemed noise sensitive due to the overwhelming daily traffic. The noise levels are so unbear- able it has deteriorated the enjoyment of residency plus eroded the property values. If this residential project came before the planner commission today it would not be approved. The Riverside Planning Commission in 1980 did not foresee Ynez Rd as a primary arterial street when the project was approved. Thank you for your attention to this letter. Sincerely, Frank X. Flynn, VILLA HERMOSA CONDOMINIUMS 27735 Tierra Vista Rd Temecula, Ca. 92592 909-694-1397 ITEM 23 APPROVAL ~/, ~ CITY ATTORNEY JF~ DIRECTOR OF FIN~NC~.~r~ CITY MANAGER /~'~' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Joseph Kicak, City Engineer and Director of Public Works July 28, 1998 Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition in Eminent Domain of Property for Street Improvement, Road and Highway Purposes in Connection with the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Consider adoption of proposed Resolution No. 98- , a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Temecula Declaring Certain Real Property Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the acquisition thereof in connection with the Overland Drive Overcrossing Project. 2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this report, take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C and D below, and consider all of the evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution, which requires a unanimous or 4/Sths vote. 3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this report, the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolution of Necessity, then the staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt proposed Resolution No. 98- (which requires a 4/Sths vote of the entire Council) and the following authorize that an eminent domain proceeding be filed to acquire the subject property interests: RESOLUTION NO. 98 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 980703 11086-00558 nlc 1754043.1 0 4. As to the resolution, if approved, approve a warrant payable to the Clerk of the Court, Riverside County in the amount of $115,300.00 for deposit in court to obtain an order for possession of the Palm Plaza, LLC property interests. 5. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: The Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project (the "Project") consists of a proposed four-lane freeway crossing that will connect Jefferson Avenue, to the west of Interstate 15, and Ynez Road to the east of Interstate 15. Overland Drive is proposed to continue easterly to Margarita Road as part of a separate project. The purpose of the Project is to provide local traffic with a means across Interstate 15 from the principally residential neighborhoods on the east to the industrial and commercial centers to the west of Interstate 15. In addition to providing a much needed means for local traffic to cross the Interstate, by providing this alternate route to local commuters, the present congestion at the Winchester Road and Rancho California Road interchanges is anticipated to be mitigated, especially during peak hours. The Subject Property Interests set forth in Exhibits 1 through 10 to proposed Resolution No. 98- __ are portions of a larger parcel known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-300-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, and 011. The larger parcel is located at the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, City of Temecula, County of Riverside. The larger parcel is located in the portion of the Project known as Stage One, which involves construction of the Overcrossing itself, and is anticipated to take approximately 18 months to complete. The Overcrossing will slope downwards towards Ynez Road, containing two lanes of travel in each direction, then widen to five lanes to accommodate turn lanes at the end of the improvement. The right of way will include drainage improvements, relocated utilities, street lights, landscaping, and irrigation improvements. The need for the Overcrossing has been recognized since the time of formulation and adoption of the General Plan in 1993. It is a component of the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. The basic framework for the highway component of the Circulation Element was established by the Riverside County Southwest Area Plan ("SWAP"), which is on file in the City Clerk's Office and incorporated in this Agenda Report by this reference. In addition to the SWAP Circulation Plan, the following plans and programs are also integral to the City's Circulation Element and are relevant to the design and location of the proposed Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project: City of Temecula Five Year Capital Improvement Program, Riverside County Congestion Management Program, SCAG 1989 Air Quality Management Plan and Regional Mobility Plan, Caltrans District 8 Regional Transportation Strategies Plan. Each of these documents is on file in the City's Public Works Office and is incorporated in this staff report by this reference. R:\bradley\ju198\1754043.t 980703 11086-00558 nlc 1754043.1 0 -- 2 - The proposed Project is designed to meet a number of objectives of the Circulation Element, including: (1) To provide for traffic service levels of D or better; (2) To implement the construction of traveled ways based on the need to provide such service; (3) Establishment of east-west continuity in the City, which will assist in mitigating traffic congestion at highway interchanges as the City develops. The location and alignment of the proposed Project has been dictated by a number of traffic and planning studies, including: (1) The General Plan, Land Use and Circulation Elements; (2) The Specific Plan for the Temecula Regional Center; (3) Traffic studies for the Temecula Regional Center. Each of the cited documents is on file in the City's Public Works Department and is incorporated in this report by this reference. The potential environmental impacts of the Project have been studied and analyzed by the City. On January 14, 1992, the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the construction of the overpass for Overland Drive and duly filed a Notice of Determination thereof (Negative Declaration EA-6). On August 8, 1995, the City of Temecula adopted a revision and modification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the relocation of utility lines (EA-6 Revised). Notice of determination thereof was duly filed on August 10, 1995. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 15162, et seq., the findings made in connection with the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. EA-6, and EA-6 Revised, are the appropriate findings with regard to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property interests. The environmental documentation prepared in connection with these actions was reviewed by staff on July 6 and 7, 1998 and it was determined that no significant changes in the Project or in the environment, and no new information had been obtained which would require further environmental analysis. To adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and determine that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the Project; R:\bradley\ju198\1754043.1 980703 11086-00558 nlc 1754043.1 0 -- 3 - D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record of the property sought to be acquired. The proposed Resolution with the subject property interests attached as Exhibits 1 through 10 is attached to this staff report. This hearing relates to issues A, B, C and D above. A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project As shown by the documents cited above, the Project is an essential component of the City's General Plan, Circulation Element. It is an integral part of the City's overall plan for addressing the existing substandard level F service at freeway interchanges and on many of the traveled ways that now provide east-west transit across the City. It will assist in relieving congestion on residential streets contributed to by truck traffic seeking alternate east-west access during peak hours when the freeway interchanges are most congested. The Overcrossing is also a component of the City's overall plan of development of a circulation system designed to meet the projected growth in the City. Overland Drive will extend from the Overcrossing as a fully improved major highway connecting Ynez Road and Margarita Road. B. The Project is Planned in the Manner that will be Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury The studies, plans and other documents cited above also evidence that the Overcrossing and the Overland Drive Project to which it is integrally related, is planned and located to provide the best practical solution to address the stated circulation and planning goals of the General Plan. C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolution of Necessity are Necessary for the Project The proposed acquisition of the subject property interests described in the Resolution is necessary for the Project as planned and designed. These interests include acquisitions in fee simple for the right of way; storm drain, pile maintenance and settlement easements necessary because of the elevation of the structure; and temporary construction easements. A diagram depicting the subject property interests with reference to the proposed Project is attached as Exhibit "A" to this staff report. D. The Offer Required By Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the Owner of Record of the Property Sought to be Acquired Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market value appraisal of the subject property interests, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer letter to Palm Plaza, LLC, owner of record of the larger parcel, on June 22, 1998. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on R:\bradley\ju198\1754043.1 980703 11086-00558 nlc 1754043.1 0 -- 4 - file in the City Manager's Office and is incorporated in this report by this reference. The owner of record and the City have engaged in further negotiations. To date however, no negotiated purchase has been consummated, and the schedule for the proposed Project requires that the City Council consider the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time. Adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity requires at least a four/fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for the proposed acquisitions through the City's Fiscal Year 1998-99 Capital Improvement Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 98- R:\bradley\ju198\1754043.1 980703 11086-00558 nlc 1754043.t 0 -- 5 -- ~Ua-~l-aO IUE UO.Oq Fi'I P, 02/03 M. Jm~m~ I.m'enz Jerry M. ~ ~J.~ ~D. ~ ~ J. J~ ~ ~ J~ L.~ ~C. ~ ~M,~ Offices in San D/egO. Tmlmcu/~ ~ L~, C~ VIA FACSII~{,~ (909) 694-4499 luly 21,1998 Ronald E. Bradley City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: DIVCOWEST - PALM PLAZA Dear Mr. Bradley: A few days ago you asked whether or not our firm would Ix: contesting Public Use and Necessity with regard to the Ovcrlaml crossing. ARcr eonfererice with my client we have determined we will not b~ contesting Public use and Necessity for the Or.land crossing. I hope this letter answers those questions. SCA:clj cc: Mr. Jim Huclskamp Mr. Bob Gravcs C :~DA'r&VZL,LENT~DIVC(I~BP~ADLE'Y LTR.DOC lbsdeft, of HADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP MEua~s or COlIMERCRL LAW AFFIUAI~.~, ~Bt,"a*~ A~o/,g?c~ TJON LAwFw,~ ~N PAfNC/IW.. CR~ WORLDYaM RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHOI~IZING THF. ACQUISITION THF~REOF IN CONNECTION WITH THF~ OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES FIF~REBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Temecula is a municipal corporation in the County of Riverside, State of California. Section 2. The property interests described generally in Section 3 of this Resolution and more particularly described in Exhibits 1 through 10 of this Resolution ("Subject Property Interests"), are to be taken for a public use, namely for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project, construction of said project, and all purposes necessary or convenient thereto, pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Temecula by eminent domain by California Constitution Article I Section 19, and California Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 40401, 40403 and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050; and 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.160, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. Section 3. The Subject Property Interests sought to be taken are located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and are portions of a larger parcel identified by Assessors Parcel Numbers 910-300-001,005, 006, 007, 008,010, 011. The Subject Property Interests sought to be taken are more particularly described in Exhibits 1 through 10 to this Resolution, which are incorporated by this reference. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds and determines that: A. The acquisition of the Subject Property Interests is required for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project ("the Project"). A general description of the Project is set forth in the Agenda Report dated July 28, 1998 and the reports and documents cited in that Report, which are all incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. B. The potential impacts of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests were analyzed in connection with the analysis of the construction of the Overland Drive Overcrossing. On January 14, 1992, the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative R:coheem\ 1754039.3b 1 Declaration regarding the construction of the overpass for Overland Drive and duly filed a Notice of Determination thereof (Negative Declaration EA-6). On August 8, 1995, the City of Temecul a adopted a revision and modification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the relocation of utility lines (EA-6 Revised). Notice of determination thereof was duly filed on August 10, 1995. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 15162, et seq., the findings made in connection with the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. EA-6, and EA-6 Revised, are the appropriate findings with regard to the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The environmental documentation prepared in connection with these actions was reviewed by staff on July 6 and 7, 1998 and it was determined that no significant changes in the Project or in the environment, and no new information had been obtained which would require further environmental analysis. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds and determines A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; B. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The property interests described in Exhibits 1 through 10 are necessary for the proposed project; and D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has made to the owners of record. Section 6. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based on the record before the City Council on July 28, 1998 when it adopted this Resolution, including the Agenda Report dated July 28, 1998, all documents incorporated in the Agenda Report, the testimony at the hearing, the records and documents prepared in connection with the Project, the testimony and evidence presented at hearings related to the Project, and the public records of the City pertaining to the Project, all of which are incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. Section 7. The City of Temecula hereby authorizes and directs Richards, Watson & Gershon, as City Attorney, to take all steps necessary to commence an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property interests described in this Resolution. R:coheem\1754039.3b 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify th at Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:coheem\ 1754039.3b 3 April 17, 1996 EXHIBIT "A" City of Temecula Overland Drive Fee Right-of-Way Caltrans Parcel No, 15941 W.O. 9012240-03 That portion of Parcel 8 of Parcel Map 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel 8, also being the most Westerly corner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19'145, as shown by map on file in Book 119 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 36 through 39 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, and also being on the Northeasterly line of parcel conveyed to State of California by Deed recorded November 15, 1967 as Instrument No. 100330, Official Records of Riverside County, California; Thence N.44°54'19"E. along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel 8, also being the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 3, a distance of 78.61 feet; Thence N.50°O7'23"W., a distance of 34.86 feet; Thence S.39°52'37'W., a distance of 67.33 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 8, also being said Northeasterly line of parcel conveyed to State of California; Thence S.28°41'00'E. along said line, a distance of 30.05 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land contains 2,306.67 square feet (0.052 acres), more or less. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the Grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the Grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to Grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. RLS/MC/yb JFD::JFOSADM:[LEGAL]I. EGAL.JQ2;91YVE3-rEB J. F, DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared Under the Supervision of: Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152 Date: ~ '" I~"~ ~ Exl:IIBIT 1 ~ pLAT IS SOLELY AN AID IN LOCATING . ' PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED PARCEL MAP ~ ~o 90 FZ.'?.40 ° 07 I dUNE R.L,5. NO. 2J4JO PARCEL TO BE O.O~Z ACi~F-.% PARCEL MAP 191L~5 P,~. Ir~ / $~-:~ INOtG',ATE% ACCE%5 RELIND. UISHED CITY OF TEMECULA' 0VEi~LAN~ DRWE FEE R~R~ - 0F'WAY' CALT~AN% PA~C~L NO; 15~z~ BY: ~ ~-98 ; 3:31P~ ; CITY OF T~EC~ ~ 8189571891;#30 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA OVERLAND DRIVE FEE RIGHT OF WAY KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP TO'THE CITY OF TEMECULA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CO55MENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON TIlE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44°54'19' EAST, 78.61 FEET TO THE TRIIE POINT OF RRGIN~ING; THENCE, LEAVING SAID LINE, NORTH 50"07'23' WEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39°52'37' EAST, 159.86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY, ON SAID CURVE TN. ROUGH A CENTRAl. ANGLE OF 05°01'14', 135.38 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 44°53'51' EAST, 174.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 °52'19', 43.46 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, SOUTH 45°05'41' EAST, 43.66 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, SOUTH 44~54'19' WEST, 510.39 FEET TO THE TR~TI~ POINT OF B~GTlgX~ING. CONTAINING 0.472 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON, P.L.S. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 gXI~IBIT 2 EXHIBIT CITY OF TE~iEO'" -. pAFI. .~ 818~5718~1;#81 PAl-.?. 8 I LP.O.B. L ,'. P~£P,~.E.O_ .OUOER THE SJ~E~$1OU' OF: . J~ES ~ DRENON P.L.S. 6153 DA~ [ ~p. 3-51-2002 ~ ENOINEERINO VENTURES, INC. .~ ~0 p~NING * C~L ENGINeRInG ~D SUING r~ I (9~) ~99-~4~ F~ [ ('909) ~gg-~6g ~t ~. I ~aW~t ~V. I DATF' LINE DATA NUU~ER BEARING N,44'54'19"E N.50'O7'23'Yt L$ N,$g'52'37'E N.44'53'51 'E L5 N.45'05'41 "W L6 N. 44'54'19"E CURVE DATA ' t~u~[~ A = 01 05'01 'I4" C2 02'52'19" DISTANCE 7&61' 24.86' 159.86' 174.68' 45.66' 510.59' R= (rr.) ~545.oo 135.3~ 867.00 43.46 CITY OF TEMECULA JOB NO: ' 238-4D SHEET 1., OF .._1_ 258...4.0wc KR PAl M pI A7A. l If4lT~'r) PART~IFRSHIP BY: -2§-98 ; 3:27PM ; CITY OF'I'~E. ~ 8189571891;~24 EXHIBIT CITY OF TEMECULA OVERLAND DRIVE FEE RIGHT OF WAY KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP K-MART CORP. TO TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL F~P NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 8 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON TIlE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44°54'19' EAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID LINE, NORTH 50°07'23* WEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39°52'37' EAST, 15'9.86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY, ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°01'14', 135.38 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 44'53'51' EAST, 174.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°52'19', 43.46 FEET TO THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID PARCELS 7 AND 8, SAID POINT ALSO BEIN~ THE TRUe. POINT OF BEGINNING, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 42'13'50' WEST; THENCE, CONTINUING ON SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15'37'21', 236.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID ..MAP, LYING 820.59 FEET FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; T~IENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, SOUTH '44°54'19' WEST, 231.59 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 7; THENCE, ON TME COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID PARCELS 7 AND 8, NORTH 45'05'41' WEST, 43.66 FEET TO THE T~. POINT OF R~GINNING. CONTAINING 0.145 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON, 8.L.S. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 K~q~IBIT 3 BY: EXHIBIT"" PAl.?. .,.9 / / 8189571891;~25 ~3 ?L M. -/-/.c) / ':, E;- P q ~. '~ .2) ~'; pAR, LINE DATA ~U~BER BEARING DISTANCE L1 N. 44'54'Ig"E 78.61' L2 N.50'O7'23'W 24.86' L3 N.$g'52'$7"E 159.86' L4 ~.44'55'51"E 174.68' L5 N. 44'54'19"E 231.59' L6 N.45'05'41 ~ 43.66' \ PROD UND£R THE ,g~IPERVISION OF: dA~£S ~ DRE~O~ P. LS. 6153 DATE ~P. 3-51-2~2 DRAWhi ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNIHG '* CML ENGINEERING [.AND SURVEYING 45500 Rf. DCE pARK ~ ° I[ .-'~2 ° TEM£CULA FAX t (.~') CURVE DATA ~U~ER Z~ = ~--. (rr.) ~= (Ft.) Cl os'of'~,~" ~545.oo ~5.3~ m 02'52'19' ~67.00 43.46 c~ ~'~r~' ~.oo 2~a~o DATE: I PROJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA JOB NO: SHEET 1 OF 1 258 2~6-4.DYIG KR PALM PLAZA LTD. PTN., KblART CORP. 5. -98 ; 3:36PM ; CITY OF TE~fEC[L 8189571891;~37 BY: ~x~I~IT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA STORM DRAIN E~SEMENT KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP K-FJ%RT CORP. TO THE CITY OF.TEMECULA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 8 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44"54'19' EAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID LINE, NORTH 50"07'23' WEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39"52'37' EAST, 159~86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEET; T~ENCE, NORTHEASTERLY, ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05c01'14#, 135.38 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 44"53'51' EAST, 174.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY oN SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02c52'19', 43.46 FEET TO THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN SAID PARCELS 7 AND 8, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF ~GI~I~G, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 42"13'50' WEST; THENCE, CONTINUING ON SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15"37'21', 236.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID MAP, LYING 820.59 FEET FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 44"54'19' EAST, 313.66 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8, ALSO BEING THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 6 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON TNE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID PARCELS, NORTH 25~07'12' WEST, 61.71 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE LYING 58.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 44"54'19' WEST, 418.46 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 31°42'02' WEST, 3.08 TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE LYING 61.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP; E~IBIT 4 BY: --26-98 ; 3:267~t ; CITY OF TE'~,E'r"'~-¥-' 8189571891,~38 EXHIBIT CITY OF TF. MRCULA STORM DRAIN EASEMENT KR' PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP K-MART CORP. TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 THENCE, ON SAID PAkALLEL LINE, SOUTH 44°54'19' WEST, 148.58 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, SOUTH 45°05'41' EAST, 17.34 FEET TO THE TRUE.~OINT OF BEGINninG. CONTAINING 0.605 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON, P.L.S. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 ~XHIBIT '~A" CITY OF TEMECULA STORM DRAIN EASEMENT KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~ABCEL 1 THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRISED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44"54'19' EAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID LINE, NORTH 50"07'23' WEST, 24.86 FEET TO THE TR~ POINT OF ~RGINNING; THENCE, NORTH 39°52'37' EAST, 159.86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY, ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°01'14', 135.38 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 44~53'51' EAST, 174.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGI.E OF 02"52'19', 43.46 FEET 'TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, F~DIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 42"13'50' WEST; THENCE, ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 45°05'41' WEST, 17.34 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE LYING 61.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 44~54'19' WEST, 501.17 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 81"53'2~' WEST, 83.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1967 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 100330 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA; THENCE, ON SAID LINE, SOUTH 28"41'00' EAST, 103.41 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39?52'37' EAST, 67.33 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 50~07'23' EAST, 10.01 FEET TO THE TRUE pQlq~T OF DEGI1TNING. CONTAINING 0.341 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON, P.L.S. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 EXMIBIT 5 Apdl 25, 1996 EXHIBIT "A" City of Ternecula Overland Drive - Pile Maintenance Easement KR Palrn Plaza Ltd Partnership to the City of Ternecula W.O. 9012240-03 That portion of Parcel 8 of Parcel Map No. 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: COMMENCING at the most Southerly corner o! said Parcel 8, also being the most Westerly corner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19145, as shown by map on file in Book 119 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 36 through 39 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California; Thence N.44°54'19'E. along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel 8, also being the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 3, a distance of 78.61 feet; Thence N.50°07'23'W,, a distance of 24.86 feet; Thence N.3.9°52'37'E., a distance of 159,85 feet;, Thence Northeasterly on a curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 1545.00 feet, through an angle of 05°01'14', an arc length of 135,38 feet; Thence N.44°53'51 'E., a distance ot 105.25 feet to the Point of Beginning of the easement to be descdbed; Thence continuing N.44°53'51'E., a distance of 62.34 feet; Thence N.42°10'35'W., a distance of 8.64 feet; Thence Southwesterly on a non-tangent curve concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 1055.00 feet, through an angle of 02°55'34', an arc length of 53.88 feet (the initial radial line bears N.42o10'35'W.); Thence S,44°53'51"W., a distance of 8.93 leer; Thence S.45°06'09"E., a distance of 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. JFD::JFDSAOM:[LEGAL}LEGAL.JSO;51YVETTEB ~IBI~ 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Overland Drive - Pile Maintenance Easement April 25, 1996 Page 2 The above described parcel of land contains 0.013 acres, more or less. RLS/MC/mn J. Fo DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~'~~ Prepared Under the Supervision of: [,~.~'~ ~ -~ Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152 X,~.d~,,~ "-~.~..~/,~.~ Date: ~' Z, t.":~ ~ JFO::JFDSADM:[f. EGAL]LEGAL. JSO;51YVETTEB 7~[R£tN. 8n R . L, ~, PARCEL MAP PARCEL NO. 23430 PARCEL 7 PARCEL MAP IC)iL~ ~ P.M. ,,~/~-~ / ~ ' /PARCEL ?__ ® COURSE DATA (~) N. 50*OTg..%"W, (~) N. ~*~6'?..' ~'1' E. E~. ~,-~-~' 'TO c~CALE No. 6152 CITY OF TEMECULA : FILE MAINTENANCE EA%E~ENT OVER KR PALM PLAT_A~LTD. PTN. PROFERTY EXH'I~IT "A') CITY OF TEMECULA SE..'rr,. .MENT .ASEM .N'r ICR PALM PLAZA LTD~,F~RTNE~:~,;.~I'O THE CITY OF TEMECULA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOU'I~ERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44°54'19' EAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 50007'23' WEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39°52'37' EAST, 159.85 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°01'14°, 135.38 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 44053'5 I' EAST, 60.91 FEET TO THE TRUF. PO~IT OF RF. GINNING: THENCE, NORTH 45006'09' WEST, 41.01 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 52°57'50' EAST, 185.65 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 38003'47' EAST, 17.75 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 40036'45° EAST; THENCE, SOUTHWESTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°29'24', 67.94 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 44053'51' WEST, 113.77 FEET TO THE TRUe. POINT OF R~GINNING. CONTAINING 0.110 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JAMES A. DRENON, JR., P.L.S. EXHIBIT 7 PAR, 7 67' ~ SCALE 1"=200' ro On'OF TEUECULA PER iNsr. No. 50?24. REC'D. 2-9-93. O.R. R~V. CO., PAR, 8 PAR, COURSE DATA N.44'54'I9"E 78.6I' N50'O?'25"W 24.86' N. 39'52°$7"E 159.85 A =05'01'14' R--1545.00' N. 44'55'51"E 60.91' N. 45'O6'O9"W 41.01' N. 52'5?'50"E 185.65' S.$8'05'47"E 17.75' /~ =04'29'24' R--867.00' L=67.94' S. 44'55'51"W 115.77' ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING · CIVIl.. ENGINEERING LANO SURVEYING ~5--'~0 ~ P~ 0~' · · 202 · /E'~'CuLa · Ca · 925~0 r~L / (m~) ee~-e. e5o f'~c i (goe) JOB NO: SHEET,OF, 258-4 IDATiE~ JPROJECT:KRPALMPLAZA, LTD. PTN. PROPERTY -12-g7 OTY OF TEMECULA OVERLAND DRIVE SETTLEUENT EASE~ENT F. XFFI'BIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA OVERI.ANT) DRIVE SE'I'TI .F. MENT EASEMENT K.R PALM PLAZA LTD. PARTNERS K-MART CORP. TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44°54'19* EAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 50007'23' WEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39°52'37* EAST, 159.85 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RAD~S OF 1545.00 FEET; THENCE, 05o01'14', THENCE, THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 135.38 FEET; NORTH a4°53'51' EAST, 60.91 FEET TO'THE TRUE POINT OF F~EGI'NNING; NORTH 45°06'09' WEST, 41.01 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 52°57'50' EAST, 185.65 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 38°03'47' EAST, 17.75 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 40036'45' EAST; THENCE, SOUTHWESTERLy ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°29'24', 67.94 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 44053'51' WEST, I 13.77 FEET TO THE TRI ~ POINT OF RF. GINNTNG. CONTAINING 0.011 ACKES MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JAMES A. DRENON, JR., P.L.S. EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT "B" \ \ PAR, 7 PAR, B \ \ \ \ \ P.M, P,M, PAR, g COURSE DATA (~) N. 44'53'51' E 60.91' (~) N. 45'O6'Og"W 41.01' (Z) N. 52'57'50"E 185.65' (~ S. 38'05'47"£ 17, 75' 67' t SCALE I"=200' TO CITY OF NO. 5O724. REC'D. 2-9-93. O.R. RIV. CO., CALF. PAR, N. 44'54'19"E 78.61' N50'O7'23"W 24.86' N. J9'52'37'E 159.85 ZX =05'01"14' R,-1545.00' I.=135.38' ,A, =04'29'24" R=867.00' L=67.94' S. 44'53'51"W 113.77' .'~,~I~ ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING ~, CML ENGINEERING -'""' LANO SURVEYING · ~ ~ FELi (909) $99-6*450 FAX ~* (COg) ~'99-55~9 IJOB. NO: SHEET I OF .. ! 238- 4 IPROJECT: KR PALM PLAZA LTD. PARTNERS ~MART CORP. PROP. CITY OF TEMECULA OV~RLANO DRIVE SETTI. EM~'IVT EA~FMENT . BY: =,-26-98 ; 3:09P.~1 ; CITY OF TF.~tE(":' A~ 8189571891;*,-3 EXHIBF 'A ' CITY OF TEMECULA STORM DRAIN IEMPOP, AI~ CONS'TRUCT]ON EASEMENT KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP K-t~T CORP. TO THE CITY OF TE~ECULA THAT PORT~ON OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH g, INCLUSIVE IN 1HE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY' RECORDER, RIVEESIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE ~OST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF' PARCEL 8 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASiLY UNE OF SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH 44' 54' I9' FAST, 78.61 FEET; THENCE, LEAWNC SAID UNE, NORTH 50' 07' 25" I~rEST, 24.86 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 39' 52' 37" EAST, 15g.86 FEEl' TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1545.00 FEEl'; THENCE, NORTHEAST~LY, ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05' 01' 14~ 135.58 FEET; THENC~ NORTH 44' 53' 51' EAST, I74.68 ~ TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 867.00 FEET,' THENCE, NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02' 52' lg", 43.46 FEET TO THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETffEEN SAID PARCELS 7 AND 8, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 42'13'50' WEST; THENCE, ON THE COMMON LINE BE'iWEEN PARCELS 7 AND 8, NORTH 45' 05' 41" WEST, 17.34 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION W1TH A LINE LYING 61.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PAP,~ I FL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL I,~AP, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUF POINT OF BFGINNING~ THENCE, CONTINUIN¢ ON .SAID COMMON LINE, NORTH 45' 05' 41" WEST, 15.00 FEET TO THE INT[RSEC~N wrrl-! A ~JNE LYING 76 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEW'ESTERLY LINE OF SAID THENCE, ON SAID PAP, At I~ LINE, NORTH 4-4' 54' 19" EAST, 572.87 FEET THE COMMON LINE BETW'ET_N PARCELS 7 AND 6 OF SAID THENCE ON SAID COMMON LINE, SOUTH 25' 07' 12' F_~T, lg. 15 FEET, TO SAID PAP,.4~IF~ LINE LYING 61.00 FEE]' NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF .SAID EXHIBIT 9 5-26-~8 ; 3:107kt ; CITY OF TEYFCUI.A--, EXHIBrr CITY OF TEMECUI. A STORM DRAIN TEMPORARY' CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT KR PALM PLAZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP K-I, IART CORP. TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA THENCE;, ON SND PAP~IFL LINE SOUTH 4-4' 54' 19" WEST 418.46 FEET; THF_.NCE, NORTH $1' 42' 02" WEST 3.08 FEET TO SA/D PARALLEL L/NE L HN~' 76.00 FEET NOflTHW~LY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL THENCE, ON SAID PARALLEL I. JNE, SOUTH 4.4' 54' lg' WEST, 148.58 FEET TO TRU£ POINT OF B?GINNING, CONTAINING 0.225 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. R~~E SUPERVISION OF: - JAMES A. DRENONo P. LS. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 REC -' MAY 2, {, t'L~ CITY OF, ENGINEERING [.;~,';:',R~ k,,:' ;.. ' "; BY: y/'. SCALE: 1"=200' "6-98 ; 3:11P~t ; £XHISIT " " P, 1'%£3430 PAR, 7 ! FAR, B T.P.0. R t t ' P.M, ~0'14 5 1 P.M, ~1~ ? 38-30 C 1 TY OF TE~\tECl - ' -, 8189571891;# PAR, 3 P.O.C.-V/'LY COP,, PAR. 3 g~, ~-~-~ ~ *J PR£PARE~ UNDER TH~PERVISION OF.' ,IA,~ES A, DRENO~ P.L.$. EXP. 5-51-2002 LINE DATA 'NUMBER BEARING DISTANCE LI N. 44'54'I9'E -' 78.61' L2 N.50'O7'25"W 24,86' L3 t,l.39'52'37'E 159.86' L4 N.44'53'51 "E 174.68' 1.5 N. 45'05'41 ~ 17.34' L6 N. 45'05'41 ~ 15.00' L7 N. 44'54'lg'"E 572.87' L8 N.25'O7'12"W 19.15' L9 N. 44'54'19'E 418.46' L10 N.31'42'O2'W 3.08' L11 N.44'54'~9"E 148.58' CURVE DATA NUUS~ A = ~= (Ft.) L= (~.) C~ 05'0~'~,~" _.. ~545.00 ~a5.a~ C2 02'52'19' 867~00 43.46 ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING "C,~L F-..NGINE~7~INO · LAND SURVEYING 43500 ~t~'E PAR. K DR ' ~i' 202 ' TE~£~U~A · ~ · 92590 ~c.m s-- I n~,,~t~m lq¥- I r)4TT'; CITY OF TEMECULA JOB NO: SHEET 1. OF I 258-4E ' 238-4.D~ PAl &i ,ol 4~'4 i Tn PT~I I(11~pT pCIPP -26-fi8 ; 3:17P~t ; C 1 TY OF TEmPlE(" :' A-, 8189571891;=13 EXHIBIT 'A' CiTY OF TE~ECULA STOR~I ORNN TE~IPORARY CONSTRUCIION EASEdtENT KR PAL~ PI. AZA, LTD. PARTNERSHIP TO TH£ CffY OF TE~£CULA PN~CFL I THAT PORT/ON OF PARCEL B OF PARCEL ~AP NO 25430, RECORDED IN PARCEL, ~AP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH g, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFF/C,E' OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 001~IIENOIN~ AT THE ~OST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEl_ B OF SAID PARCEL ~P; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHE~TERL¥ LINE OF' SAID PARCEL 8, NORTH ~' 54' lg" EAST, 78.6'/ FEET; THENCE, LEAMN¢ SAiD LINE, NORTH 50' 07' 23" WEST, 24-.86 FElL'r; THENC£ NORTH 39' 52' 37" EAST, 159.86 FEET TO THE BEOINNING OF A CUIWE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAt4NG A RADIUS OF 1'54.5.00 FEET; THENC,~, NORTHEASTERLY, ON SAID CUIWE THROUGH A CEN7RAL ANGLE OF 05' 01 '/4", 1'35.38 FEET; THENOF., NORTH 44' 53' 51' EAST, 1'74-.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CUR/E CONCAVE SOUTHEAST~L.¥ AND HAWN~ A RADIUS OF 867,00 FEET; THENCE, NORq'HE457ERL¥ ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02' 52' Ig', 43,4.6 FEET TO THE ¢OI~I40N BOUNDARY LINE BETWEFt4 PARCELS 7 AND 8, OF SAID t~AP, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 4.2'13'50" WEST; THENCE, ON THE COI~t40N LINE BETWEEN PAR¢~-w 7 AND 8, NORTH 45' 05' 4'/" WEST, 17.34 FEET TO THE INTERSECTDN WITH A LINE LYINg 81.00 FEET.NObLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL SAID POINT BEING THE ~UF. p~)fi~tT OF' THENCE, ON SAID PAPALLEL LINE, SOUTH 44' 54' 1'9' WEST, 501',17 t"EZT; THENCE, NOiUH 8'/' 53' 21'* WEST, 1'8.73 FEET TO THE INTERSEC~N WITH A LINE LYING 76,00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARN. LU.. WT[H THE SOUTHF_ASTERL¥ LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE, ON SND PAP, AI f~ LINE, NORTH 44' 54' ~g' FAST, 5'/2.39 FEET TO THE CO~ON UNE B~ SA/D PARCELS 7 AND THENCE, ON SAID LINE SOUTH 45' 05' 4~' EAST, '/5.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTA/NIN/.,' O. 175 ACRES, t~Ot~ O~ LESS. PREPARED UNDER THF~ SUPERVISION OF': J ES DRENO/ , P.m.S. LS 153 BY: --26-fi8 ; 3:18P~ ; CiTY OF T~IE ..... A- 81895718~1;#14 EXHIBIT 'A " CiTY OF TEMECULA STORM DP~N TEMPOPJ~Y CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT K[~ PAL~ PL.~ZA, LTD, PARMERSHIP TO THE CfiY OF TEMECUU~ PARCFL 2 THAT PORT/ON OF PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO 23430, RECORDED IN PARCEL F. AP BOOK 168, PAGES 7 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTf, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOI LOVid3: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL. 6; THENCE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6, ALSO BEINC THE S'OUTNEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP, NORTH 44' 54' lg" EAST, 48.08 F-LET TO THE MOST EAS1T. RLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 6; THENCE, ON THE E~LY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6, ALSO BEINC THE WES'7ERLY LINE OF YN/:'7 ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, NORTH 10' ~3' 15' WEST, 35.11 FEET TO 'THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1133.00 FEE; THENCE. NORTHERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01' 46" 51', 35.22 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE LYING 58.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PAR.~I ~ ~ WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF .SAID PARCEL ~AF', A-RADIAL lINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 77' 59' 56" EAST, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE' POINT OF BF'GfNNING: THENCE. ON SAID PARALLEL LINE. SOUTH 44' 54' 19' WEST, 66.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY' LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6: THENCE. ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 6, NORTH 25' 07' 12' WEST, lg. 15 FEET, TO THE INIERSECTION WITH A LINE LYING 76.00 FEET NORTHWEEIERLY OF' AND PAF~ ~ F'[ WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF' SAID PARCEL MAP;*' THD/CE, O~...q.~D PARAIIFL LINE, NORTH 44' 54' lg" EAST, 71.71 FEET TO SND Et~'*T~L¥ LINE OF SAID P,~CEL 6, BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOU'P,.~~LY AND HAVING A P, ADtUS OF 1133.00 FEET, A P, ADV~L UNE TO SAID POINT *BEARS NORTH 76' 55' 09" EAST; * THENCE, ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 6, SOUTHERLY ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01' 0#' 27", 21.35 FEET TO THE TRUF' POINT OF BFGINNING, CONTAINING O. 02g ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVlSI,ON OF: J.U/ES ,4. DRENON, P.L.S. LS 6153 EXP. 3/31/02 EXHIBIT" " PAFL 2 O. 02g AC~E$ J£ SCALD 1"=200' p,M~. £B480 P.M. ~B 7..,g FAR. PAR. P,M, PAR. 1 PA~, a UNE DATA NU~B~ B~ING L1 N,~'5~'19~ ~ N.~07'23~ ~ ~.3g'52'37"E L4 N.~'53'51 P.O.C.-~LY ~, P~ 3 ~ N.~'05'41~ ~ S'LY ~ P~, 8 L6 N.~'54'Jg"E ~ L7 N. 8~'53'21 L10 N,~'54'~g~ ' ~ ~ ~ J L12 N,~'54'~9~ ~o~ ~,,~ L13N.2~07'12~ - CURVE DATA PR~ED UNDER ~E SUPSSION OF: NUMB~ ~ = C2 0~52'19" J~ A. DR~ON P. LS. 6153 ~ 01'46'5i" ~P. 3-5~-2002 C~ 03'04'47' PAR. 2 ENGINEERINO VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING · CML E~IGINEE. RING LAND SURYE'YTNG _. DISTANCE 78.61' 24.86' 159.86' 174.68' 17...,x4' 501.17' 512.39' 15.00' 48.08' 55.11' 66.76' 1g. 15' 71.71' IDRA~/~i BY: IDATE: I PROJECT:' 5-20-98 R= (rr.)' 'L= (rr.)' 1545.00 155.58 867.00 43.46 1135.00 35.22 1133.00 21.$5 CITY' OF' TEMECULA JOB NO: SHEET _..L_ OF' _ 1__. 238- 238-4.D ~(R PtgJ,~ PU~Z.A, LTD. PT~. KU,~T CORP. STORM DRAIN TEt~P. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ITEM 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~-~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council "'~oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 28, 1998 Ordinance 98- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: ~_~Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) AMARITA WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MC CABE ROAD 2) MONTELEGRO WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MCCABE ROAD 3) NICOLAS ROAD BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND VIA LOBO 4) LA PAZ STREET BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BACKGROUND: Section 40803 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, an engineering and traffic survey must be conducted to establish a prima facie speed limit which is found most appropriate to facilitate a safe and orderly movement of traffic. An engineering and traffic survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. Staff has conducted engineering and traffic surveys to establish an appropriate speed limit on several roadway segments as follows: Amarita Way and Montelegro Way Loop - These streets provide primary access to the Paloma Del Sol residential community and currently the speed limit is not posted. Since Amarita Way and Montelegro Way were recently accepted as City Maintained Streets, a study was conducted to determine an appropriate speed limit for these roadways. Based on this study a speed limit of 40 MPH is recommended for Amarita Way and Montelegro Way. Nicolas Road between Winchester Road and Via Lobo - The speed limit on Nicolas Road is currently posted at 50 MPH. However, due to installation of an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road, the prevailing speeds justify a 45 MPH speed limit on this roadway. r :~gdrpt~9 8\0 7 2 8~lxllimit .ordlajp La Paz Street between Ynez Road and Highway 79 South - The existing engineering and traffic survey for this roadway has expired. The new study does not indicate that a change in the currently posted speed limit of 35 MPH is necessary. On July 9, 1998, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission reviewed the proposed speed limits, and unanimously recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code to establish new speed limits as shown on Exhibit "A". FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Public Works Signs Account No. 001-164-602-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-602-5410. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 98- 2. Exhibit "A" - Affected Roadway Segments 3. Exhibit "B"- Location Maps 2 r :~gdrpt~98~O 728 ~.pdlimit .ord/~jp ORDINANCE 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) AMARITA WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MCCABE ROAD 2) MONTELEGRO WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MC CABE ROAD 3) NICOLAS ROAD BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND VIA LOBO 4) LA PAZ STREET BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the following speed limits be established given the engineering and traffic studies. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Amarita Way between Pio Pico Road and McCabe Road Montelegro Way between Pio Pico Road and McCabe Road Nicolas Road between Winchester Road and Via Lobo La Paz Street between Ynez Road and Highway 79 South Declared Prima Facie Speed l.imit, Miles Per Hour 40 40 45 35 r :\~Qdrpt [98\0728~pdlirnit.ord/ajp Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of August, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk § r:\~gdrpt\98\0728~.pdlimit .ord/ajp [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98-~ was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of July, 1998 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 1 lth d~iy of August, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk r :~drpt\98 \0728~pdlimit .~rd/~jp EXHIBIT "Name of Street and Portion Affected Amarita Way between Pio Pico Road and McCabe Road Montelegro Way between Pio Pico Road and McCabe Road Nicolas Road between Winchester Road and Via Lobo La Paz Street between Ynez Road and Highway 79 South * First Time Speed Survey Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit. Miles Per Hour 40 ~ 40" 45 35 3 r:~dr pt~9 8~0 7 2 8~13dlimit.ordlajp EXI]IBIT "B" LOCATION MAP ~F EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP sv~oo~o ,,.~..~ EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP 1 · ITEM 25 APPROVAL O~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 28, 1998 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 88- 12 (Ynez Corridor) PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director/~" That the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution 98- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 {YNEZ CORRIDOR) DISCUSSION: The County of Riverside (the "County") established Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) (the "District") in 1989 to finance the acquisition of a park site and improvements to Ynez Road, the Overland Drive overcrossing and other related public improvements. In 1992, the County issued special tax bonds for the District in the principal amount of $18,325,000 (the "Bonds") to finance a portion of the improvements. Effective December 1, 1997, responsibility for the District was transferred from the County to the City. On May 12, 1998 the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds. On June 25, 1998 special tax refunding bonds in the amount of $18,690,000 were issued. This refunding will result in a savings in debt service costs of approximately $2.3 million over the next twenty years. The refunding bonds are special, limited obligations payable solely from special taxes levied on property in the District and moneys held under the refunding bond documents. The refunding bonds are in no way general obligations of the City. Each fiscal year a special tax is required to be levied in an amount to meet the total amount of principal and interest payable on the bonds, the estimated amount to be incurred for administrative expenses, and the amount necessary to replenish any reserve funds. This amount will be calculated and divided by the total number of acres of taxable property in the District. The resulting amount per acre will be multiplied by the number of acres in each parcel to produce the amount of the special tax for such parcel for the fiscal year. The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1998-99 fiscal year is $1,596,823.94. FISCAL IMPACT: The calculated special tax required to be levied for the 1998-99 fiscal year is $1,596,823.94. This amount represents a $108,503.38 or 6.79% reduction from the 1997- 98 special tax levy. Attachments: -Special Tax Calculation Worksheet -Resolution No. 98- 2 1998'99 Budget City Of Temecula CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Special Tax Calculation Worksheet Bonds Outstanding $17,845,000.00 Delinquency Rate for Fiscal Year 1997-98 0.50% March '99 Interest September '99 Interest September '99 Principal Total Debt Service Reserve Fund Requirement Current Reserve Fund Balance Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve Adjustment Total Obligation $1,531,468.75 $1,531,468.75 $0.00 $0.00 $471,625.00 $471,625.00 $585,000.00 $1,528,250.00 $0.00 $1,$28,250.00 Fiscal Agent (Sedes 1992) thru 9/2000 Fiscal Agent (Sedes 1998) thru 9/2000 Tax Consultant (Webb) Auditor -Con,oiler [,egal (Foreclosure/Other) Sales Tax Reimbursement Admin Prior Admin Costs (County/Other) City Adminis~ation. Total Administration Prior Year Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $60.O0 $10,000.00 $11,412.00 $21,472.00 A~usted Amoun~ $4,937.50 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $100.00 $58,011.61 $3,600.00 $18,833.24 $7,500.00 Current Year Levy $4,937.50 $6,000.00 $6,0O0.00 $100.00 $58,011.61 $3,600.00 $18,833.24 $7,500.00 $104,982.38 Total Obligation Total Administration Prior Year Surplus/(Deficit) Total Requirement Administration % of Levy Maximum Authodzed Tax City's % of Levy ITotal Levy' FY 1997-98 Levy Difference $1,528,2~0.00 $104,982.35 ($36,408.41) $1,596,823.94 $7,806,711.47 $1,705,327.32 ($108,503.38) 6.57% 0.47% -6.79% I:/cities/temecula/misc/budgets/1998 7/21/98 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Temecula, California is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor), created pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside has enacted Ordinance No. 690 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD; and WHEREAS, the City Council has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, acting as the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) as follows: Section 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct. Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 9841 and County of Riverside Ordinance No. 690, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $1,596,823.94 on the parcels which comprise the CFD for Fiscal Year 1998-99 as set forth on a magnetic tape to be provided by Albert A. Webb Associates to the Auditor-Controller of the County. Section 3. The special tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by County of Riverside Ordinance No. 690, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 4. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: Ao Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. 98-41 and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 5. The Auditor-Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 6. The County Auditor-Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor-Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of July, 1998, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC. J~_ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Ma nagei/,~ty/~u n cil FROM: Gary Thornhall, C~mmunity Development Director DATE: July 28, 1998 SUBJECT: Monthly Report Prepared by: Valerie Wimberly, Administrative Secre '~~, RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for the month of June 1998: Caseload Activity: The Department received 54 applications for administrative cases and 8 applications for public hearing cases for the month of June. The following are the public hearing cases: · Minor Conditional Use Permit 2 · Development Plan - subject to CEQA 1 · Tentative Plan with CEQA 1 · General Plan Amendment with Specific Plan 1 · Annexation Fees 1 · Conditional Use Permit 1 · Change of Zone 1 Total Attachments: 1. 2. List of Activities with Detail - page 3 Revenue Status Report - page 4 R:XMONTtILY.RPTq998xa'UNE.WPD 7/21/98 vgw ] Ongoing Projects: Regional Mall: Phase I grading operations have ended, Phase II to commence in late June. Building construction is expected to commence in early summer of 1998, with the opening scheduled for fall 1999. Murdy Ranch Specific Plan: Staff is awaiting contact from the new owner. No activity on this case. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: The draft Specific Plan was submitted July 17, 1998. It is anticipated that the EIR will be submitted in the not too distant future. Southside Specific Plan: Staff is reviewing the drafted Specific Plan and incorporating the Planning comments from the May 20, 1998. Massage Business Ordinance; This item will be scheduled for City Council workshop in August. Adult Business Ordinance: This item is scheduled for the August 11, 1998 City Council meeting. General Plan Circulation Element Update (and revision to citywide traffic study): The consultant has commenced work. The fourth Steering Committee meeting will be held on August 3. The project is on schedule. Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is in the process of developing an appropriate subdivision ordinance for the City. The City currently uses Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 to regulate the subdivision of land. Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation Study: Staff is proceeding with the annexation of the Redhawk/Vail Ranch area. Aresolution for the commencement of proceedings for the annexation and pre-zoning has been scheduled for City Council on July 28, 1998. Staff will submit the application to LAFCO shortly there after. If all goes well, it is anticipated that the item will go before LAFCO in October 1998 and the election for rates and charges will be held in March 1999. Surface Mining Ordinance: Staff is currently developing a Surface Mining Ordinance to ensure that sites are excavated in a safe and reasonable manner with progressive reclamation to a natural appearing or otherwise useable condition compatible with adjacent areas. R:~vIONTHLY. RPT~,I995kI!JNE.WPD 7/21/98 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LIST OF ACTIVITY BY CASE NUMBER R:hMONTHLY.RPT~I998xJUNE. WPD 7/21/98 vgw 3 0 © ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:~vlONTHLY.RPTxI998~JUNE.WPD 7/21/98 vgw 4 REVPRIN2 07/13/98 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4~14 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4135 4136 4139 4140 4170 4171 4]90 4195 4200 4206 4369 4370 11:50:08 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPOlaRRY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIRONENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE K-RAT STUDY FEES HOME OCCUPATIONS DEVLPMNT PLAN-ADMINISTRATIVE DIF REDUCTION APPLICATION IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1998 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 5,900.00 24,700.00 .00 30,500.00 16,800.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 3,600.00 31,100.00 16,300.00 5,600.00 111,900.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 5,200.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,700.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 7,400.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 JUNE REVENUE .00 .00 .00 1,364.00 3,099.00 .00 2T3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,841.00 .00 .00 4,695.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,665.00 543.00 .00 .00 .00 1,749.35 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 650.00 1,430.00 .00 .00 9,796.35 1997-98 REVENUE .00 1,950.00 900.00 3,068.00 11,967.80 .00 26,811.80 3,450.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 31,227.00 .00 .00 104,594.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 11,285.00 3,071.00 190.00 1,476.0d 162.00 25,188.30 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 14,370.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,950.00 11,510.00 .00 374.00 61,500.35 PAGE BALANCE .00 1,950.00- 900.00- 2,832.00 12,732.20 .00 3,688.20 13,350.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 854.00 127.00- 16,300.00 5,600.00 7,306.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 11,285.00- 3,071.00- 5,010.00 1,476.00- 162.00- 25,188.30- .00 13,700.00 .00 3,000.00- 14,370.00- .00 .00 4,500.00 7,400.00 1,950.00- 11,510.00- .00 126.00 61,500.35- COL 52.0 48.5 87.9 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~.3 100.4 0.0 0.0 93.5 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~.8 PLANNING 295,000.00 30,105.70 320,791.25 25,791.25- 108.7