HomeMy WebLinkAbout052098 PC MinutesMINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 20, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:00
P.M., on Wednesday, May 20, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Miller, Soltysiak, and
Chairwoman Slaven.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Principal Engineer Parks,
Attorney Curley,
Associate Planner Fagan, and
Minute Clerk Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Although there were no public comments, Acting Chairwoman Slaven informed the attending
public that Chairwoman Fahey has resigned from the Planning Commission, noting that she was
a valuable asset to the Commission and that she will be greatly missed.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
2. Approval of Minutes of April 1. 1998, and April 15. 1998
With regard to the April 1, 1998, minutes, Commissioner Miller requested that page 4 be
amended to accurately reflect Mr. Russell Rumansoff's address as 27394 Jefferson Avenue.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the April 1, 1998, minutes as amended.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to approve the April 15, 1998, minutes as written. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who abstained.
3. Southside Specific Plan Workshop
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (as per written material) and introduced Mr. AI
Zelinka.
By way of overheads, Mr. AI Zelinka, representing Urban Design Studio, Project Manager for
this project, provided a detailed overview of the proposed Southside Specific Plan, identifying
preliminary opportunities as well as constraints, reviewing issues identified by the community,
highlighting components of the Specific Plan, describing the proposed list of permitted uses,
and advising that the proposed Specific Plan was designed to provide flexibility as well as a
diverse mix of uses. Reviewing the public participation process with regard to this Plan, Mr.
Zelinka advised that the community suggested that the westside of Front Street be zoned
Community Commercial. Further addressing the Commissioners' comments, Mr. Zelinka noted
the following:
that extensive input was received from the business and property owners of this
area;
that the business and property owners viewed high-density residential as an
opportunity to increase market potential;
that concerns were expressed with regard to the combination of the
interchange/bypass, noting that individuals may bypass Front Street;
that public meetings with regard to this issue primarily included business and
property owners of the area of discussion;
that there was support of the First Street bridge connection but that concern
was expressed with regard the possibility of constructing Santiago into an
interchange;
that the community would not view the Batch Plant (currently a legal non-
conforming use) as a long-term use;
that uses between Community Commercial and Highway-Oriented Commercial
are not drastically different but that new uses were introduced to ensure the
ease of locating a use in the area of discussion;
that the public was pleased with sections of the landscaping;
that because of the flood plane issues, development of the creek side is viewed
as challenging.
In response to Mr. Zelinka and in response to the written material (of record), the following
comments/issues were raised by the Commissioners:
that an Animal Hospital/Shelter, Laundromat, recreational vehicle park, and a
recycling collection facility would not be viewed as a compatible use for the
Highway-Oriented Commercial Zone; that a use such as a sidewalk cafe should
be permitted. It was noted by Mr. Zelinka that although it would be within the Commission's
discretion to change the proposed land uses, it was viewed by the community that a sidewalk
cafe would be more compatible in the northern section of the study area;
that a bicycle sales/rental/service shop should be permitted in the Highway-
Oriented Commercial Zone but that a funeral parlor would not be compatible;
that the proposed Plan should be customized to the particular area and,
therefore, it was recommended to reconsider, redefine, and create consistency
with the proposed uses.
Although this was not a public hearing, Acting Chairwoman Slaven invited public input at this
time.
Mr. Doug Juengst, 28936 Front Street, Suite 105, representing RSS Associates (property
located within the Service Commercial Zone), requested that this property be retained at
Service Commercial.
Further elaborating on Mr. Juengst's request, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that it would
be within the Commission's purview to recommend to the City Council that the Service
Commercial Zone be extended by 208' to the south.
Mr. Robert Quaid, 28822 Front Street, reiterated the request of RSS Associates to retain the
property within the Service Commercial Zone and further elaborated on his plan to purchase
property including the parcel of discussion in order to build a new Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
facility (proposed building to be in excess of 18,000 square feet), advising that if Service
Commercial were not retained, he would not be able to close escrow on the property.
In light of the public input he had received during the review process, Mr. Zelinka advised that
the community would be supportive of the proposed Harley-Davidson facility.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the Harley-Davidson facility would be permitted under
the existing zone but would not be permitted as part of the Southside Specific Plan and,
therefore, Mr. Quaid was desirous of addressing the Commission with his concern.
As long as the proposed building would be designed in such a fashion that it would be
compatible with the area, it was the consensus of the Commission to approve the 208'
extension to the south.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that the
transportation corridors for Front Street were not designed to provide landscaped medians,
noting that such medians would prohibit utilizing Front Street as a parade route.
Commissioner Soltysiak requested that specific language be included to demonstrate the actual
financing of the facade improvements as well as landscaping.
Requesting that the proposed uses be readdressed, redefined, and customized to the area of
discussion, Acting Chairwoman Slaven requested that any future workshop include the use of
photographs to describe the conceptual ideas.
Planning Al~plication No, PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application No,
PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map)
Request to approve several clean-up amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use
Plan and Zoning Map and amendments to the Development Code to modify landscape
requirements for automobile dealerships, modify side yard requirements for shopping
centers, clarify the heights of accessory structures in the HR, VL, L-l, L-2, and LM
zones, adding regulations for temporary construction trailers in residential zones
clarifying side yard storage for vehicles, adding motorcycle parking space dimensions,
and adding a requirements for wheel stops in commercial zones.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve
the request,
Commissioner Miller noted that he would be abstaining with regard to the Spanos Panhandle
property.
By way of a zoning map, Associate Planner Fagan presented a detailed overview of the staff
report (as per agenda material) and provided additional clarification with regard to the Salkind
property (currently zoned as Medium Density Residential) and commented on staff's
recommendation to zone the property as Highway-Tourist Commercial versus Service
Commercial because of the adjacent residential developments.
Further elaborating on his situation, Mr. Sonny Salkind, 339575 Glen Oaks Road, advised that
he has been the owner of the property for the past 28 years; that one piece of his property has
been bifurcated by the City/County line, zoning the County portion as CPS which is a mixture
of Highway-Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC); that the Service
Commercial Zone would be more compatible with the County's CPS zone; that although he has
an existing entitlement on the property for the use of a drive-through restaurant, no permits
have been pulled; and that the HTC zone would be limiting the permitted uses of his property.
In response to the Commission, Mr. Salkind voiced no objection to a continuance with regard
to his property in order for staff to readdress the issue with him.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that she had
received a phone call from Mr. Dick Kennedy requesting a continuance on behalf of Mr. Atwood
with regard to the Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards. Ms. Ubnoske noted that Mr.
Kennedy was not specific as to the concerns and that she had requested that a letter be
submitted requesting the continuanc~ and stated that she had not received such a letter. It
was noted that she and Associate Planner Fagan will be meeting with the individuals tomorrow
in order to address any concerns.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue this matter in order to permit Mr. Atwood to
relay his concerns with regard to the Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards. After some
additional discussion and due to the lack of a second, this motion was withdrawn by Mr. Miller.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION
ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-
811-001, 914-811-002, 914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-
006, 914-811-007, 914-812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003, AND 914-812-
003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO LM (LOW -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE)
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE
ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S
DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING
CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE HR, VL, L-l, L-2,
AND LM ZONES, REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS
IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD STORAGE FOR VEHICLES,
MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR
WHEEL STOPS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, DELETING PALA VILLAGE FROM THE
LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-811-001, 914-811-002,
914-811-003, 914-811-004, 914-811-005, 914-811-006, 914-811-007, 914-
812-001, 914-812-002, 914-812-003 AND 914-812-003 FROM VL (VERY-LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM(LOW-MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025 FROM SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A
PART OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND REASSlGNING
NUMBERS (SP-1 THROUGH SP-8) TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN
THE CITY
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
Associate Planner Fagan reviewed the staff report with regard to the Spanos Panhandle (of
record).
Attorney Curley noted that the Commission may direct staff to prepare a resolution to reflect
the application of the Negative Declaration PA98-0170 and to draft a resolution similar to the
previously approved resolutions, inserting the proper APN and deleting the General Plan
Element.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the upcoming General Motors request (designed to
comply with the Development Code Amendments) may be reviewed prior to any action being
taken on the Development Code Amendments and, therefore, the proposed applicant would be
inconsistent with the current Development Code. In order to address this issue, Planning
Manager Ubnoske, as per Attorney Curley, noted that the proposed applicant may submit plans
under the existing Development Code and that approval may be granted with the imposition of
the following condition: ... subject to and contingent upon the City approving the amendment
to the Development Code which will be requiring less landscaping. Ms. Ubnoske noted that the
Commission may act on the matter this evening, noting that Mr. Kennedy and/or Mr. Atwood
would still have the opportunity to address their concerns with the City Council.
Clarifying that it would not be the City's intent to retrofit automobile dealership facilities which
may propose minor changes, Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested the addition of specific
language clarifying that the proposed standards would solely pertain to new construction and
would not affect expansions of existing facilities.
Providing additional clarification with regard to section g. of the Automobile Dealership
Landscape Standards (buildings which are accessible to the public shall have landscaping
around the perimeter to accomplish the following: break up the building massing, break up large
areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade), Associate Planner Fagan noted
that the intent of this section was to provide more landscaping around the access points to the
public not to the service bays, loading doors, etc.
Following additional discussion with regard to this section, it was the consensus of the
Commission that the section be amended as follows: The showroom portion/main sales building
which is accessible to the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter to accomplish the
following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual
interest and provide shade. In order to further clarify this amendment, it was suggested by
Planning Manager Ubnoske that a graphic be attached.
Because the proposed landscape standards for automobile dealerships references a 20'
landscape buffer, it was the consensus of the Commission to amend the existing City Design
Guidelines from 15' to 20' with regard to the landscaping buffer in order to eliminate the
potential of a conflict.
In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Associate Planner Fagan reviewed the added provision
with regard to construction trailers, advising that a minor development plan would be required
in order to give the Planning Department the ability to impose some conditions with regard to
these trailers.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing; to adopt Negative Declaration
for Planning Application No. PA98-0170 (General Plan Amendments) and Planning Application
No. PA98-0109 (Zoning Amendments - Development Code and Zoning Map); to adopt
Resolution No. 98-014; and to adopt Resolution No. PC 98-015, deleting the Salkind property
and continuing that item to the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1998.
MOTION: With regard to the Spanos Panhandle, Acting Chairwoman Slaven moved to
continue this matter in order for staff to prepare a resolution to reflect the application of the
Negative Declaration PA98-0170 and to draft a resolution similar to the previously approved
resolutions, inserting the proper APN and deleting the General Plan Element. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Commissioner Miller who abstained.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Planning Manager Ubnoske informed the Commissioners that City Manager Bradley,
Community Development Director Thornhill, and two Councilmembers are attending the
International Conference of Shopping Centers in Las Vegas in order to negotiate additional
leases for the Mall.
B. Ms. Ubnoske also informed the Commissioners that a new Project Planner by the name
of Tom Thornsley has been hired.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:20 P.M., Acting Chairwoman Slaven formally adjourned this meeting to the June 3, 1998,
Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 P.M.
Marcia Slaven, A Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager