HomeMy WebLinkAbout082598 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make masonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title il]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
AUGUST 25, t998 - 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pureu.,ant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real.property negptiator pu~u;!nl~ to GOvernment Code Section 64956.8
conceritlng the aCqaisiti:0n of real'.!pr0pe~' I.~Cai~! at42051 Main Strset(APN 922-036-
020'), 21~lN~ Front Street (APN 92'24)35-001), 2~86~7i'Front Street (APN 9224)45-017), 28735
Pujol S~reet (APN 9."?.2-0624)19), 28731 Pu]ol Street (APN 922-062-016), 28725 Pujol Street
(APN 922-062-0tO), 42291 Sixth street (APN 922~0~2-01t), no situs (APN 922-053-080),
4t 830 Sixth Street {APN 922-03t-0~ 8), 41858 Fifth '.Street, (APN 922-031-009), 41843 Fifth
Street (APN 922-022-010). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/parcels of
Redevelopment Agency of the city of Temecula and Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold,
Ladanyl Rutner, Co'rbin, Ciais, Otto lot, Pelorierb, iValencla, and Eppenger. Under
negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to
be conveyed and/or acquired.
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28721 Front Street (APN 922-073-
017, APN 922-046-022, and APN 922-073-024). The negotiating parties are the City of
of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Cleveland Investment
Co., and Margaret and William Forther. Under negotiation are the price and terms of
Payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The
following case will be discussed: Strachota Insurance Agency vs. City of Temecula.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
549565.9(b) with respect to three matters of potential litigation. With respect to each
matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a
significant exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the Agency based on existing
facts end circumstances.
R:~Agenda\082598
1
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can
be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Mayor Ron Roberts presiding
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 98-16
Resolution: No. 98-84
Chris Jordan
Pastor John R. Chambers of Grace Presbyterian Church
Councilman Stone
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that
appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on
the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form
must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time.
A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
R:~Agenda~082598
2
2
4
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement with Riverside County
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the amendment, final form to be
approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
Approval of Contracts for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve an agreement for Consultant Services with Esgil Corporation to perform plan
review services for the Building and Safety Department for a term of three (3) years,
expiring June 30, 2001;
5.2 Approve an agreement for Consultant Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates to
perform Plan Review Services for the Building and Safety Department for a term of
three (3) years, expiring June 30, 2001.
R:~Agenda~082598
3
6
7
8
9
10
Tract MaD No. 23371-10 (located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23371-10 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
6.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
6.3 Approve Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance bond,
Labor and Materials bond and Monument bond as security for the agreements.
Tract MaD No. 23371-9 (located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23371-9 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
7.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
7.3 Approve Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond,
Labor and Materials bond and Monument bond as security for the agreements.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 24133-5 (located westerly of
Montele~ro Way between McCabe Drive and Leena Way)
RECOMM EN DATION:
8.1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 24133-5;
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-1 (located northwestern
corner of intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation security in Tract No. 27827-1;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Secudtv in Tract No. 27827-F (northwesterly corner of
intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-F;
R:~Agenda\082598
4
11
12
13
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Acceptance of Easement Deeds, Offers of Dedication, and Rights of entry and Temporaw
Construction Agreements for the Promenade Mall Infrastructure Off-Site Storm Drain, and
Related Purposes (located southwesterly of Margarita Road at Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
CERTAIN EASEMENT DEEDS FOR SLOPE AND STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD
PURPOSES, AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENTS FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING
TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT
Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for Relocation of Sanitary
Sewer for Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15, Project No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATON:
12.1
Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale and authorize the Mayor to execute
both documents.
12.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection,
and testing fees in the amount of $4,470.00.
Resolution in Support of Railroad to Railroad Grade Separation at Colton, California
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING
THE RAILROAD TO RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT AT COLTON,
CALIFORNIA
R:~Agenda~082598
5
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY
R:~Agenda~082598
TEMEGUL~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICoT MEEtiNG
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01
Resolution: No. CSD 98-17
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items
that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the
Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board
of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak"
form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES' REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
R:~Agenda\082598
7
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 8, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
City
R:~,genda~082598
8
TEME,CU..~: REDEVELgPMENT AGENCY MEETING)
**,~'~'~,'~W'~.~**~,~,.~'~ ~ ~,~ ~'~ &~, ~ ~*****************************
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 98-01
Resolution: No. RDA 98-14
CALLTO ORDER:
Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLLCALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Linderoans
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on
items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency
gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL - Mayor Roberts
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Old Town People-Mover
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Being presented for discussion at the request of Counc!lmember. Lindemans.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts
R:~,genda~082598
9
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 8, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda~382598
10
WINCHESTER HILLS FINANClNO AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. WHFA 98-02
Resolution: No. WHFA 98-13
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson JeffComerchero
ROLL CALL:
AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Winchester Hills Financing
Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to
two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the
Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency
gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the next regular meeting: September 8, 1998, scheduled to follow the Redevelopment Agency
meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula., California ~
R:~Agenda~082598
11
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at
the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written
correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
14
Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels Der Ordinance No. 91-18,
Chapter 6.16
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING
CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF
HAZARDOUS VEGETATION
15
Plannine Aoplication No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Sections of the City's Development Code
Pertaining to On-site Storaee of Vehicles (Includine Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA97-0349;
15.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION 17.24.020. D OF THE
TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN
VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
16 Adoption of Zoning Regulations and Licensing of Sexually Oriented Businesses
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the
proposed ordinance;
R:~Agenda~,082598
12
~ 16.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO, 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING
FOR THE ZONING REGULATION AND LICENSING OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED
BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH
REGULATIONS
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17 Murrieta Creek Project Committee Membership
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Appoint one member of the City Council to serve on the Murrieta Creek Project
Committee.
18 Award of Construction Contract for Mamarita Road Storm Drain - Project No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Award construction contract for the Margarita Road Storm Drain - Project No. PW97-7
~-- and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
18.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount which is 10% of the contract amount.
19 Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Funding ReQuest
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Consider an $18,000 funding request from the Temecula Valley Playhouse for their
community service programs.
20 Arts Council of Temecula Valley Community Service Funding ReQuest
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Review and consider the Arts Council of Temecula Valley Funding request for $22,000
for their community service programs.
R:~genda~)82598
13
21 Temecula Library Services
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Discuss a possible agreement with the City of Murrieta and County of Riverside
regarding the Temecula Library.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 8, 1998, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda~082598
14
ITEM
1
ITEM
2
City Council AuClust 11, 1998
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 11, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 4956.8
concerning the acquisition of portions real property located at 27622 and 27628 Jefferson
Avenue. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and Connie Hill and Dean Hill. Under
negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be
acquired.
2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at 42051 Main Street (APN 922-036-020),
28545 Front Street (APN 922-035-001), 28677 Front Street (APN 922-045-017), 28725 Pujol
Street (APN 922-062-010), 42291 Sixth Street (APN 922-052-011), no situs (APN 922-053-
080), 41830 Sixth Street (APN 922-031-018), 41858 Fifth Street (^PN 922-031-009), and 41843
Fifth Street (APN 922-022-010). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/parcels of
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold, Cadeus
Properties, Ladanyi, Rutner, Corbin, Ciais, Otto lot, Pelonero, Valencia, and Eppenger. Under
negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be
conveyed and/or acquired.
3. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b) with respect to three (3) matters of potential litigation. With respect to each matter,
the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant
exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and
Roberts.
Absent: Councilmember: Ford.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Brad Beyenhof.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Sofia Sadler of Harvester Church of Temecula.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Lindemans.
City Council August 11, 1998
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Sergeant Mitch Aim presented an update on the City's T.A.G. (Temecula against Graffiti)
Program and extended recognition to those individuals responsible for the success of this
Program - the Temecula Police Officers, the Reserve Officers, the citizen volunteers, the close
cooperation with the City's Public Works Department, and the Temecula Unified School
District's Maintenance Department. Sergeant Aim introduced Police Officer Jeff Kubel who
further elaborated on the success of this program.
Councilman Lindemans requested that special recognition be given to those individuals who
have volunteered to make this Program the success it is.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. On behalf of the Old Town merchants, Mr. David Lewis, 28561 Front Street, thanked the
City Council for its support to Old Town dudng the streetscape improvement project. Mr. Lewis
as well relayed his support of an Old Town Trolley.
B. Echoing Mr. Lewis' comments, Ms. Audrey Hicks, 28635 Front Street, extended her
appreciation of the Council's support during the construction period.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Councilman Stone advised that he had attended the League of California Cities meeting
of August 10, 1998, at which the 25% reduction of the Vehicle License Fee was discussed,
relaying his concern of no future guarantee of the State's General Fund allocations to the
citites.
B. Councilman Stone commended the T.A.G. Program on its success as well as the
Neighborhood Watch Program and extended appreciation to Maintenance Superintendent
Buron and his staff for their immediate response time with regard to graffiti removal.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2. Ai3~3roval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 14 and July 28, 1998.
(Councilman Lindemans abstained with regard to the approval of the July 28,
1998, City Council minutes.)
City Council Au.qust 11, 1998
o
Resolution Approvin.ci List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of June 30. 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1998.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Board Membership
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Appoint a principal and an alternate representative to the newly constituted
Board.
Mayor Roberts was appointed as the principal and Councilman Comerchero was
appointed as the alternate to the Board.
Joint Proiect Fundinn Aqreement - Highway 79 South Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the Joint Project Funding Agreement with the County of Riverside
Assessment District No. 159 for Highway 79 South Phase II and authorize
the Mayor to execute the agreement.
Acceptance of Grant Deed for portion of Pala Road (Temecula Creek) Bridge Proiect
Right-of-Way and Related Purposes
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
City Council Au.qust 11, 1998
10.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN CORPORATION
GRANT DEED FOR RIGHT OF WAY, SLOPE
EASEMENT, AND TEMPPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT FOR PALA ROAD (TEMECULA CREEK(
BRIDGE PROJECT FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION
PRUPOSES BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME (KCY
DEVELOPMENT, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION)
Acce13t Public Im13rovements in Parcel MaD No. 24085-3 (located northwesterly of the
intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Ddve - Avenida de Ventas)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map 24085-3;
8.2
Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance security to the warranty
amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (within Parcel MaD.
No. 24085-3 (located westerly of the intersection of Winchester Road at Diaz Road
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 24085-3)
Accept Substitute Agreement and Securities in Tract No. 23304 (located northerly of
Rancho California Road westerly of Humber Street)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities in
Tract No. 23304;
10.2 Authorize an eighteen-month (18) extension of time and release the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials securities on file;
10.3 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation security on file;
4
City Council August 11, 1998
11.
12.
13.
14.
10.4 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Sureties.
Accel:)t In-Tract Public Im~3rovements in Tract No. 24131-3 (located northwesterly of
Meadows Parkway at Leena Way
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept In-Tract public improvements in Tract No. 24131-3;
11.2 Authorize reduction In-Tract Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten
percent (10%) warranty amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
11.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Accel:)tance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (within Tract
No. 24131-3 (located at the northwesterly corner of Meadows Parkway at Leena Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC ST
REETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 24131-3)
Release Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No. 26861-1
(located southwesterly of the intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79 S)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
securities for public and private improvements in Tract No. 26861-1;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Faithful Performance Securities for Certain Im;)rovements in Tract No. 26861-3
(located southwesterly of the intersection of Highway 79 S at Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty securities for certain
improvements including private streets and drainage, and water and sewer
systems in Tract No. 26861-3;
14.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
City Council Au.qust 11, 1998
15.
16.
17.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Securities for Certain Improvements in Tract No.
26861-F (located southwesterly of the intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79 S)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty securities for certain
improvements in Tract No. 26867-F;
15.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-13
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, PRE-ZONING
THE AREAS KNOWN AS THE REDHAWK AND VAIL
RANCH SPECIFIC PLANS AS PART OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0205 ESTABLISHING ZONING
FOR THIS AREA AS SPECIFIC PLAN THAT IS
SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS
ORDINANCE AS EXHIBIT A
Second Readinn of Ordinance No. 98-14
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
6
Cib/Council Au.qust 11, 1998
18.
ORDINANCE NO. 98-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS
OF THE ClTY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING
TO SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR SHOPPING
CENTERS, HEIGHTS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
IN THE HR, VL, L-1 AND L-2 ZONES, REGULATIONS
FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFYING SIDE YARD
STORAGE FOR VEHICLES, RELOCATING THE
MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS FROM
SECTION 17.24.050.A. TO SECTION t7.24.040.G.3
(ADDED), REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEEL STOPS IN
COMMERCIAL ZONES, MODIFYING SECTION
17.16.070 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, DELETING
PALA VILLAGE FROM THE LIST OF SPECIFIC PLANS
AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTIES
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 914-
8tt-001, 914-811-002, 9t4-81t-003, 914-811-004, 914-
8tt-005, 914-811-006, 9t4-8tl-007, 9t4-812-001, 9t4-
812-002, 914-812-003, AND 914-812-004 FROM VL
(VERY-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .2-.4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 92t-090-038 AND
921-090-039 FROM H (HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
TO LM (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3-6
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 944-331-001 THROUGH 944-331-025 FROM
SP - SPECIFIC PLAN (A PART OF THE RANCHO
HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN) TO H (HIGH-DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 13-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
AND RE-ASSIGNING NUMBERS SP-I THROUGH SP-8
TO THE VARIOUS SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE CITY
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-15
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
7
City Council Au.qust 11, 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 98-15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) AMARITA WAY
BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND MCCABE ROAD, 2)
MONTELEGRO WAY BETWEEN PIO PICO ROAD AND
MC CABE ROAD, 3) NICOLAS ROAD BETWEEN
WINCHESTER ROAD AND VIA LOBO, AND 4) LA PAZ
STREET BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND HIGHWAY 79
SOUTH
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I - 18.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Councilman Ford who was absent and with Councilman Lindemans
abstaining on the approval of the July 28, 1998, minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
19. Ador)tion of Zoning Regulations and Licensing of Sexually Oriented Businesses
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of August 25, 1998.
Referencing the recommendation to continue the public hearing, City Attorney Thorson advised
that the hearing would be renoticed to reflect the addition of a Negative Declaration.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue the public hearing to the August 25, 1998,
City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval with the excel~tion of Councilman Ford who was absent.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20.
Plannin~ APplication No. PA98-0235 - Commencement of Actions
Necessary to Detach Certain Real Property from the City of Temecula, located
on the North side of Winchester Road, at the Citv's Northern City Limit and
Known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-140-007 (Sonny Salkind, Property Owner)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
City Council Au.qust 11, 1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0235 - THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ACTIONS NECESSARY TO
DETACH CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND WAIVING CONDUCTING
AUTHORITY PROCEEDINGS PER SECTION ,56837 OF
THE GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER
ROAD, AT THE ClTY'S NORTHERN CITY LIMIT AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-140-007
Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (of record), noting
that because of the size of the property of discussion, he would not be concerned about
any potential City impacts as a result of future County zoning and potential use of the
property.
Expressing appreciation to the City Council and Planning Commission for its efforts
with regard to this issue, Mr. Sonny Salkind requested that the City Council approve
this request.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved adopt Resolution No. 98-82. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exce~3tion of Councilman Ford who was absent.
21. Termination of Museum Lease with Temecula Valley Museum
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN SECOND
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
MUSEUM LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA
VALLEY MUSEUM, INC., TERMINATING THE LEASE
Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (of record).
MOTION: Councilman Linderoans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-83. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Councilman Ford who was absent.
Cit~ Council August 11, 1998
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With regard to Closed Session Item Nos. 1 and 2, City Attorney Thorson advised that the
City Council gave direction to him as well as staff and that final action with regard to the
acquisition would be taken in Open Session. With regard to Item No. 3, City Attorney
Thorson advised that two issues were discussed and direction was provided.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to
Tuesday, August 25, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
10
ITEM
3
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,547,839.39.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 25th day of August, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 98- I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 25th day of August, 1998 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 98- 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/06/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/13/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/25/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/06/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/26/98 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND
150 AB 2766 FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 ~NITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD - DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
1"2 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
.5: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BYFUND:
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
GENI~BERTS. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER ~
310,100.36
22,128.47
17,723.48
108,425.99
10,896.10
24,487.56
24,170.93
816.25
,176,231.19
618,014.37
20,505.65
15,048.26
11,520.00
17,853.59
0.00
0.00
116,807.90
2,551.47
37,513.44
56.82
185.05
2,270.41
1,056.84
1,421.90
664.57
2,996.18
1.1~5.05
3,525.26
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
418,473.18
352,924.78
1,606,244.54
170,196.59
2,377,642.50
170,196.89
2,547,839.39
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
15:09
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/MOO SET ASIDE
190 CO#HUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
111,092.17
5,700.68
24,560.86
126.34
49.96
6,689.79
383.85
222,76~.22
12,822.91
4,660.52
4,411.61
11,147.66
14,062.61
TOTAL 418,47'5.18
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/05/98 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUHBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AJ4OUNT
50779 08/03/98 003324 TEMECULA STAGE STOP, TH PARTIAL DEPOSIT REL PA97-0405 001-2650
50780 08/03/98 002372 HARMON, dUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
6,000.00
488.00
6,000.00
488.00
50781 08/04/98 003324
50782 08/04/98
TEMECULA STAGE STOP, TH
WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTE
REIMB:ADD~L CONSTRUCTION COSTS
REFUND:ENGINEERING DEPOSIT
280-199-804-5804
001-2670
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 001-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 165-7350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) Ul ETT QTR 2 1998 190-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 192-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 193-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX ¢EO0) UI ETT OTR 2 1998 194-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT OTR 2 1998 280-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 330-2350
107998 07/29/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UI ETT QTR 2 1998 340-2350
50785 08/06/98 003087 A F CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY RES.IMPROV. PROGRAM:CASTELLON 165-199-813-5804
9,292.00
44,500.00
2,693.94
129.55
2,624.15
1.80
9.02
18.04
27.43
36.43
204.75
615.00
9,292.00
44,500.00
5,745.11
615.00
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310
50786 08/06/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA NELSON AUGUST PYT 001-1180
632.30
12.90
55.92
1.72
4.30
4.30
21.50
17.20
750.14
50787 08/06/98 003316 ACT NOW
TEMP HELP W/E 6/27 MENDO7_A 280-199-999-5362
170.10
170.10
50788 08/06/98 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL MISC. POOL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
50788 08/06/98 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL CREDIT:INVOICE PAID PREVIOUSLY 190-180-999-5212
511.81
475.00-
36.81
50789 08/06/98 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP
50789 08/06/98 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP
LDSC ARCHITECT SRVCS MARG. PRK 210-190-119-5802
LDSC ARCHITECT SRVCS WIMCH.PRK 210-190-149-5802
400.00
300.00
700.00
507913 08/06/98 ALONZO, ARTHUR
REFUND:W(~4ENS SOFTBALL LEAGUE 190-183-4994
150.00
150.00
50791 08/06/98 AMAVISCA, LORRI REFUND:SWIMMING CLASS 190-183-4975
27.00
27. O0
50792 08/06/98 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
TEMP HELP W/E 7/18 WILLIAMS 280-199-999-5118
199.95
199.95
50793 08/06/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR MAINT. FAC. 340-199-701-5250
50793 08/06/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250
50793 08/06/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250
50794 08/06/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - TCC 190-184-999-5212
50794 08/06/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212
50794 08/06/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212
241.16
95.87
35.02
152.70
330.00
230.50
372.05
713.20
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
5O795
50796
50796
50796
50796
50796
50797
50798
50798
50798
50799
50800
50801
50802
50803
50804
50804
50804
50804
50804
50804
50805
50805
50805
50805
50805
50806
50807
50807
50808
50809
50810
50811
50812
15:09
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002871
003138
003138
003138
003138
003138
000128
000126
000126
000126
002534
000135
001195
001555
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
003328
003328
003328
003328
003328
000442
003179
003179
003315
002106
002413
001233
VENDOR
NAME
BOYKIN, EDUARD W.
CAL MAT
CAL MAT
CAL MAT
CAL MAT
CAL MAT
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CATERERS CAFE, THE
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CHRISTOPHERSON FIRE PRO
CLERK OF THE COURT, RIV
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]OEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CONPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
CONPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
CC~!PEX LEGAL SERVICES,
COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION
CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION
COUNTRY REVIEW, THE
DA FAMILY SUPPORT
DALEY & HEFT
DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC.
DARDEN, KRISTINA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PORTABLE P.A. SYSTEM
A.C. FOR PUBLIC I,K)RKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
MOBILE EQUIPMENT POLICY 98/99
LDSC IMPROV. - TMS BALLFIELDS
LDSC IMPROV. - T.C.C.
LDSC IMPROV. - T.C.C.
REFRESHMENTS PLANNING MTG 7/6
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
JUL ALARM MONITORING - CRC
CRC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYS. TEST
R-O-W AGU]SITION - PALM PLAZA
000140 1500 A&S
000140 600 A&S
000140 600 A&S
000140 800 A&S
000140 800 A&S
000140 CANCER
JUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
JUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
JUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
dUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
dUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
REPAIR PROX CARD READER C.HALL
C/O #1 SIDEWALK IMPROV.PW97-02
RETENTION W/H SIDEWALK IMPROV.
AUG ADVERTISING - OLD TO~N
002106 SUPPORT
JUN LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS
REFUND:SWIMMING CLASS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-1970
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
300-199-999-5200
190-180-999-5415
190-184-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-161-999-5260
001-164-601-5244
190-182-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
210-1652,
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
340-199-701-5212
210-1990
210-2035
280-199- 999- 5362
190-2140
300-199-999-5246
001-164-601-5218
190-183-4975
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,910.00
56.57
163.51
163.24
164.32
137.65
2,986.00
920.00
960.00
488.29
84.05
372.13
50.00
72.00
115,300.00
22.00
56.00
39.75
66.50
47.75
107.02
336.19
34.~
10.61
330.77
278.07
58.00
3,794.00
379.40-
235.00
82.50
495.71
5.33
27.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,910.00
685.29
2,986.00
2,368.29
84.05
372.13
50.00
72.00
115,300.00
339.02
990.37
58.00
3,414.60
235.00
82.50
495.71
5.33
27.00
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50813
50814
50815
50816
50816
50816
50816
50816
50816
50817
50818
50818
50819
50819
50819
50819
50819
50819
50819
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
15:09
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000609
002466
001669
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
000478
000478
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
OO20O2
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
VENDOR
NAME
DOUBLETREE HOTEL
DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
ES
ES
ES
ES
ES
ES
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERV!C
EMPLOYMENT SERVlC
FALLON, ROBERT
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
HTL:LEAGUE CF 8/26-28 TCSD CON
AUG ELEVATOR MAINT./SERVICE
SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL
TENP HELP N/E 7/17 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP N/E 7/17 WILLIAMS
TENP HELP W/E 7/17 MILES
TENP HELP W/E 7/17 MILES
TENP HELP g/E 7/17 MILES
TENP HELP g/E 6/19 DONAHOE
REFUND:SUIMMING CLASS
CONST.SIGNS O.T.ST.SCAPE PRJCT
SALES TAX
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LZFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD
FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 STD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5258
340-199-701-5212
001-164-601-5218
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
190-183-4975
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-1280
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360~
330-2360'
340-2360
001-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,375.00
199.10
322.15
551.76
551.76
176.16
176.16
352.32
3,213.18
55.00
1,233.67
95.61
22.75
12.50
53.75
54.25
49.25
22.50
12.50
721.50
11.25
129.37
.45
1.11
13.67
5.73
6.75
4.50
18.00
12.00
20.67
1,358.33
27.88
224. O0
.90
2.03
26.49
11,07
14.08
8.58
44.71
10.25
31.63
1 ~496.25
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,375.00
199.10
322.15
5,021.34
55.00
1,329.28
227.50
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
15:09
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50820
50822
50822
50822
50822
50822
50823
50824
50825
50826
50827
50828
50828
50828
50828
50829
50830
50831
50832
50833
50833
50834
50835
50836
50836
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
000351
000177
002409
001013
000194
000194
000194
000194
0028~2
001407
000199
001186
002695
002695
003194
003223
002023
002023
VENDOR
NAME
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GILLISS, MAX C.M.
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
HAZ PAK INC.
HEADLEY, MATT
HINDERLITER deLLAMAS AS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
INLAND EMPIRE SMALL BUS
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
IRWIN, JOHN
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
FORGERSON PAINTING
K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN
KING, WENDE
KING, WENDE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002OO2 STD
OO2OO2 STD
OO2OO2 STO
OO20O2 STD
DO2002 STO
OO2OO2 STD
909-506-2626 JUL SUB-STATION
909-676-3526 JUL CITY F. ALARM
909-693-0956 JUL GENERAL USAGE
909-694-4356 JUL HINTERGAROT
909-694-8927 JUL GENERAL USAGE
JUL PROF SRVCS-PALA RD BRIDGE
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
HAZNAT MATERIAL SERVICES
REFUND:PARK RENTALS
QTR 3 CONSULTAlON FEE-SALES TX
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
SPNSRSHP ~98 DIAMOND VENTURE
MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
000199 IRS GARN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
JUL PLAN CHECK SERVICES
JUL PLAN CHECK SERVICES
PAINT LIGHT POLES-CITY PRKG LT
BIOLOGICAL SRVCS-PALA RD BRIDG
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
165-2500
190-2500
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
001-170-999-5229
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
210-165-631-5801
001-170-999-5229
001-164-601-5430
190-183-4988
001-140-999-5248
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
001-111-999-5270
190-182-999-5212
001-2140
190-183-999-5330
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
340-199-701-5250
210-165-631-5801
190-183-999-5330
190-183-'999-5330
ITEM
AMOUNT
29.95
240.63
.97
2.19
28.47
11.88
15.13
9.21
48.03
11.01
33.98
257.55
82.75
28.65
30.57
27.52
5,000.00
219.82
1,803.00
25.00
900.00
2,090.90
18.75
269.99
27.25
500.00
189.64
318.55
256.00
1,311.90
191.99
2,965.00
954.56
170.74
340.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,632.65
427.04
5,000.00
219.82
1,803.00
25.00
900.00
2,406.89
500.00
189.64
318.55
256.00
1,503.89
2,965.00
954.56
510.74
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50837
50837
50838
50839
50839
50840
50841
508~2
50843
50844
508~5
508~6
5O847
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~8
508~9
508~9
508~9
50850
50850
50850
50850
50850
50850
50851
50852
50853
50853
50853
15:09
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000548
000548
001282
001123
001123
003314
003260
000380
003212
002893
000869
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
00138~
00138~
00138~
002980
002980
002980
002980
002980
002980
002105
002105
002105
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
KIPLINGER CALIFORNIA LE
KIPLINGER CALIFORNIA LE
KNORR SYSTEMS, INC
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KROUSE CONSTRUCTION
LA CRESTA PLASTIC FENCE
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SUBSCRIPTION:CALIF. LETTER
CREDIT:KIPLINGER TAX LETTER
MiSt POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
SUPPLIES FOR STENCIL TRUCK
SALES TAX
RES.IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM:PATTON
VILLAGES REPAIR/MAINT. FENCE
BUS:7/16 DAY CAMP TRIP S.D.PRK
LANCE SWEENEY & ASSOCIA UPDATE LDSC STANDARDS/SPECS
LARA, NOE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH WELKS EXCURSZON 8/12
LEINHOS, CATHY
REFUND:SWIMMING CLASS
LOCKHART, TRACY
REFUND:k~qEN~S SELF DEFENSE
MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076
MET LIFE IHSURANCE CONP 003076
MET LIFE INSUI~RNCE CC~4P 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP
OENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
OENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
OENTALML
COBRA/NELSON-FLAMMER AUG
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
QTY 2000 ENVELOPES- CITY
QTY 10,000 WIN.ENVELOPES-CITY
SALES TAX
NOD CRAFT, INC
NOD CRAFT, INC
HOD CRAFT, INC
MOO CRAFT, INC
MOD CRAFT, INC
MOO CRAFT, INC
JUN PRGSS:ADA PRK IMPRV C0#1&2
JUN PRGSS:AOA PRK INPRV C0#1&2
JUN PRGSS:ADA PRK INPRV
JUN PRGSS:ADA PRK INPRV
JUN PRGSS:ADA PRK IMPRV C0#1&2
RETENTION:JUN PRGSS:ADA PRK IM
MURPHY, CARRIE
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
O'HARA, SUSANNE
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
OLD TC~/N TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOt~N TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TCR4N TIRE & SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-999-5228
280-199-999-5228
190-182-999-5212
001-16~-601-5218
001-16~-601-5218
165-199-813-5804
193-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5340
193-180-999-5248
190-183-999-5330
190-18~-999-5350
190-183-4975
190-183-4982
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
280-2340
300-2340
340-2340
001-1180
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
210-190-~37-5804
210-190-1~8-5804
210-190-137-5804
210-190-148-5804
210-190-148-5804
210-2035
190-183-4975
190-183-4975
001-161-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
73.00
38.00-
110.98
124.10
9.62
2,950.00
4,902.63
282.10
480.00
112.80
464.00
25.00
20.00
2,629.78
97.79
270.36
20.87
58.67
19.56
78.23
106.50
176.82
410.01
45.48
4,607.28
18,486.88
10,042.93
40,297.57
5,143.79
7,857.85-
27.00
25.00
98.42
196.49
221.38
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
35.00
110.98
133.72
2,950.00
4,902.63
282.10
480.00
112.80
464.00
25.00
20.00
3,281.76
632.31
70,720.60
27.00
25.00
516.29
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50854
50855
50856
50857
50858
15:09
CHECK
OATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002406
000472
0007'53
001585
VENDOR
NAME
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PARADISE CHEVROLET, INC
PARTY PZAZZ
PAUL GARDNER CORPORATIO
PEREIRA, MICHAEL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
RE-ISSUE CK:FURNITURE FOR CITY
REPAIR & HAINT OF CITY VEHICLE
RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR TEEN PRG
REL RETENTION PW95-16
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DEO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
50859 08/06/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-701-5219
190-180-999-5214
190-183-999-5320
210-2035
190-183-4975
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
300-2090
001-2090
190-2090
191-2090
192-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
194-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,690.00
248.19
96.01
21,992.44
36.00
484.77
214.33
71.43
1,127.40
360.49
.85
844.50
39.46
5,7~2.57
920.46
15.56
38.40
347.27
120.08
1.49
155.25
808.68
1,707.53
148.83
3,607.57
676.35
19.10
104.45
16.00
2,725.86
981.37
107.53
100.~
33.59
3.48
52.07
375.36
41.45
13.35
18.90
152.56
33.90
1.78
154.14
981.37-
PAGE 6
CHECK
ANOUNT
1,690.00
248.19
96.01
21,992.44
36.00
21,377.58
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
15:09
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
5O86O
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50861
50862
50862
50862
50862
50862
50863
50863
5O863
50863
50863
5O864
5O865
50865
5O866
5O866
50866
5O866
50867
50867
50867
50867
5O868
50869
50870
50871
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/06/98
0U/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001958
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
002110
002110
002110
002110
002110
002930
002930
002930
002930
002930
003308
000262
000262
002412
002412
002412
002412
002985
002985
002985
002985
001365
002743
0O2864
000645
VENDOR
NAME
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS'ENTERPRISE CO~4PAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP
R D 0 RENTAL COMPANY
RANCHO CALIFORNIA HATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA HATER
RICHARDS, gATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, gATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, gATSON & GERS
RICHAROS, gATSON & GERS
RICK ENGINEERING CONPAN
RICK ENGINEERING CONPAN
RICK ENGINEERING CONPAN
RICK ENGINEERING CONPAN
RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SEA gORLD OF CALIFORNIA
SMART & FINAL, INC.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
001958 PERS L-T
1YR SUBSCRIPTION:FINANCE DEPT
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0170
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0293
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0203
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0149
PUBLIC NOTICE: 98-0171
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0297
PUBLIC NOTICES:90-1
PUBLIC NOTICES:PA98-0170
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0224
PUBLIC HOTICES:PA97-0349
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0046
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0254
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0319
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR Pg MAINT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR Pg MAINT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR Pg MAINT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT
FLOOR MATS & UNIFORMS RENTAL
FLOOR MATS & UNIFORMS RENTAL
FLOOR MATS & UNIFORMS RENTAL
FLOOR MATS & UNIFORMS RENTAL
FLOOR MATS & UNIFORMS RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT
01-99-02003-0 FLOATING METER
02-79-10100-1 N.W. SPRT PRK
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
ENG SVS:MARGAR]TA RD WIDENING
ENG SVS:MARGARITA RD WIDENING
ENG SVS:MARGARITA RD WIDENING
ENG SVS:MARGARITA RD WIDENING
HEALTH PERMIT:49151 NORAGE RD
LOCKSMITH SVCS-VARIOUS PARKS
DAY CAMP MAJOR EXCURSION
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2122
001-140-999-5228
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5238
340-199-701-5250
190-184-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
340-199-702-5212
190-182-999-5250
001-164-601-5238
001-164-601-5250
190-180-999-5240
001-130-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
190-180-999-5246
210-1990v
210-1990
210-1990
210-1990
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5~40
190-183-999-5320
ITEM
AMOUNT
50.77
124.80
19.00
18.00
20.00
17.00
18.00
17.00
6.25
21.50
17.00
17.00
17.00
18.75
18.50
186.66
85.65
64.77
43.10
68.25
85.80
52.05
40.71
33.60
80.25
21.02
227.72
59.89
472.02
822.23
146.29
822.23
2,434.39
265.73
1,894.40
87.50
420.00
16.48
935.00
53.20
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.77
349.80
448.43
292.41
21.02
287.61
2,262.77
4,682.02
420.00
16.48
935.00
53.20
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
15:09
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50872
50872
50872
50872
50872
50872
50872
5O873
5O874
5O875
50875
50875
50875
50875
50875
50875
50876
50876
5O877
50877
50877
50877
50877
5O878
50878
50878
50878
50878
50878
50879
5O88O
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50880
50881
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000537
000537
000537
000537
0O0537
000537
000537
002361
003318
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
000168
000168
000815
000815
000815
000815
000815
0OO642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
002769
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
000978
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF FPO'S
TARTAGLIA, MARIO
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEMECULA FLO~/ER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLONER CORRAL
TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S
TEMECULA VALLEY CATHYrS
TEMECULA VALLEY CATHYrS
TEMECULA VALLEY CATHYrS
TEMECULA VALLEY CATHYrS
TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TEMECULA~ CITY OF - FLE
TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TODDfS FENCING
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS.
TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
2-11-007-0455 SIXTH STREET
2-10-747-1393 MONROE PED
2-02-351-4946 SIXTH STREET
2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL
2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS
2-15-671-5518 PALA TC1
2-02-502-8077 VARIOUS METER
MEMBERSHIP DUE: PISTER,CHARLES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
SUNSHINE FUND
PER COUNCIL REQUEST:STEFFEN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
8/6/98 FLEX BENEFITS
RESIDENTIAL IMPRVMNT:SLAUGHTER
002107 VL ADVAN
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VL REVER
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
002107 VOL LIFE
EMERGENCY RESPONSE VOLUNTEERS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-603-5240
340-199-701-5240
190-181-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
340-199-702-5240
001-171-999-5226
190-183-999-5330
001-2125
190-2125
191-2125
192-2125
193-2125
194-2125
320-2125
001-2170
001-101-999-5285
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-1020
165-1020
190-1020
280-1020
300-1020
320-1020
165-199-813-5804
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
192-2510
193-2510
194-2510
340-2510
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
340-2510
001-171-999-5274
ITEM
AMOUNT
668.72
33.53
1,404.58
6,024.35
791.89
107.43
806.07
65.00
570.00
556.16
82.00
1.03
2.05
14.35
3.07
17.84
217.49
59.80
600. O0
120.00
60. O0
120.00
120.00
3,811.47
271.25
480.00
183.75
9.50
350.00
1,018.00
174.60
156.80
10.64
.18
.88
1.76
4.34
175.45-
159.35
12.10
4.00
1,312.50
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,836.57
65.00
570.00
676.50
277.29
1,020.00
5,105.97
1,018.00
349.20
1,312.50
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
15:09
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
50882
5088~
5088~
50883
5088~
5O883
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5088~
5O884
5088~
5088~
5088~
5O885
50885
50885
50885
5O886
50886
5O886
5O886
5O886
5O886
5O886
5O887
5O888
50889
50890
CHECK
DATE
O8/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002065
002065
002065
002065
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000854
002566
001890
VENDOR
NAME
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M /PEBSCO
U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERV%CE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERV%CE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS
VORTEX DOORS
WARNER, JANINE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF CC~4P
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 OEF COt4P
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 OEF COMP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER OEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER OEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER OEPOSIT
8 1/2 X 11 WHITE PAPER
8 1/2 X 11 PASTEL PAPER
LASER COLOR COPY PAPER
SALES TAX
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 ug
000325 lN
MEMBERSHIP: GARY THORNHILL
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
DOORS REPAIRS & MAINT. AT CRC
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
330-2160
340-2160~
001-100-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-170-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-16~-604-5230
320-199-999-5230
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
192-2120
193-2120
194-2120
340-2120
001-161-999-5226
320-199-~-5221
190-182-999-5212
190-183-49~
ITEM
AMOUNT
5,995.69
22.T5
1,222.60
2.05
30.90
103.77
22.73
93.33
565.61
157.40
744.92
179.51
1,660.06
53.01
7.20
72.18
7.32
70.94
977.20
43.59
259.57
4.48
169.6~
459.45
215.07
464.23
211.11
2.39
2,844.00
578.00
51.50
269.20
147.00
1.00
24.79
.15
.75
4.00
.31
160.00
285.54
452.71
25.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
8,216.81
2,716.88
2,884.99
3,742.70
178.00
160.00
285.54
452.71
25.00
VOUCHRE2
08/05/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50891
50891
50891
50891
50891
50891
50891
50891
50892
50892
50892
50892
50892
50892
50892
50892
50892
50893
15:09
CHECK
DATE
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
O8/O6/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
08/06/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
002~61
VENDOR
NAME
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
~AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
XEROX CORPOIL~TION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
SOUTHERN CALIF FPO'S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINT.SUPPLIES-VARIOUS PARKS
MAINT.SUPPLIES-MAINT.FAClLITY
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC
MAINT.SUPPLIES-SENZOR CENTER
I~INTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199:701-5212
JUNE BASE CHRGE:FZOONAJ COPIER 330-199-999-5239
JUNE BASE CHRG: 5343CAS COPIER
JUNE METER USAGE: 5?65EDIT
JUL LEASE ON 5100A COPIER
JUL LEASE ON 5100A COPIER
dUL LEASE ON 5100A COPIER
JUNE BASE CHRG:VARIOUS COPIERS
JUNE BASE CNRG:VARIOUS COPIERS
JUNE BASE CHRG:VARIOLIS COPIERS
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5391
190-182-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
330-1990
CLASS:96 EDITION NFPA:PISTER,C 001-171-999-5261
ITEM
AMOUNT
145.38-
100.11
41.07
79.72
168.32
244.28
228.13
109.91
110.00
242.77
310.70
1,658.37
401.22
60.44
144.82
1,532.74
2,856.58
80.00
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
826.16
7,317.64
80.00
TOTAL CHECKS
418,473.18
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
11:69
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA OEV' LOW/HOD SET ASIOE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSO SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUNO
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
AMOUNT
136,709.30
6,890.30
42,153.92
10,769.76
24,357.60
8,668.14
432.40
100,912.29
4,591.59
3,157.51
10,118.65
372.34
3,790,98
TOTAL 352,924.78
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
11:49
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENOOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50894
50895
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
153459
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
1&0429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
160429
50898
50899
08/10/98
08/10/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/12/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
000314
000314
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
OOO283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
000283
001515
000936
TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM
TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F
AMERICAN RED CROSS
DRAW REQUEST:CABINETRY/LGTHING
FINAL DRAW: PETER-BUILT HCMES
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
00O444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000285 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
00028~ MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
WEED ABATEMENT SVCS-LOMA LINDA
SUPPLIES FOR 1ST AID CLASSES
210-190-808-5804
210-190-808-5804
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-164-601-5402
190-183-9~-5310
2,144.97
92,364.10
39.67
3.54
110.65
.73
.48
4.81
4,674.69
121.31
887.58
1.53
3.73
64.44
24.82
51.55
13.55
191.07
28.98
122.09
18,075.93
306.08
4,635.03
8.79
22.95
323.08
141.56
129.34
46.80
751.39
125.40
563.88
4,426.16
93.52
1,322.90
2.44
6.50
80.61
39,27
45.74
24.08
160.93
38.62
129.81
700.00
10.00
2,144.97
92,364.10
6,345.22
31,500.81
700.00
10.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 11:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50900 08/13/98 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
TEMP HELP N/E 7/25 MILLIAMS 280-199-999-5118
187.05
187.05
50901 08/13/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES-MAINT.FAC. 340-199-702-5212
50901 08/13/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES-MAINT.FAC. 340-199-702-5212
223.50
206.10
429.60
50902 08/13/98 002541 BECKER, ~ALTER KARL
50903 08/13/98 BENNETT, SIBYL
REPAIR/INSTALL FENCE-KA~EA ST. 001-164-601-5402
REFUND:WELKS EXCURSION 190-183-4980
4,940.00
32.00
4,940.00
32.00
50904 08/13/98 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
1~.20
175.20
50905 08/13/98 002878
BUSINESS INFORMATION SY
ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING
320-199-999-5261
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
50906 08/13/98 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT 001-164-601-5218
4,140.00
84.05
206.88
8~.78
83.24
83.78
44.45
4,140.00
586.18
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 001-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 165-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 190-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 191-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 192-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 193-~70
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 194-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 280-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 300-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 320-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 330-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS CONP INSURANCE 7/98 340-2370
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 330-199-999-5112
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS CONP INSURANCE 7/98 190-183-999-5112
50907 08/13/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 7/98 190-181-999-5112
50908 08/13/98 001089
CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVES
MUNICIPAL CF:9/29 THORNHILL
001-161-999-5258
3,440.70
70.07
1,409.83
.81
2.00
51.23
21.84
39.96
5.36
39.56
10.51
285.08
7.31
31.42
1.58
125.00
5,417.26
125.00
50909 08/13/98 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST FINGERPRINT CARD PROCESSING 190-180-999-5250
84.00
84.00
50910 08/13/98 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV QTR 2 STRONG MOTION COLLECTED 001-2280
50910 08/13/98 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV QTR 2 STRONG MOTION COLLECTEO 001-2290
50910 08/13/98 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV CITY~S 5% OF SMI COLLECTEO 001-162-4229
50911 08/13/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV. - MISSIONS/POQUTI 193-180-999-5212
50911 08/13/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA TPJ~)EWINDS IRRIG. IMPROVEMENT 193-180-999-5415
50911 08/13/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA EMERGENCY MAINLINE REPAIR 190-180-999-5212
50911 08/13/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV. - VILLAGES/SIGNET 193-180-999-5415
50912 08/13/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. ROBERT HEMME - 7/24/95 300-199-999-5205
50912 08/13/98 000131 CARL ~ARREN & CO., INC. OLD VAIL PARTNERS - 11/12/93 300-199-999-5205
3,226.94
2,039.06
263.30-
220.00
1,785.69
547.11
400.00
75.00
15.00
5,002.70
2,952.80
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 11:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50912 08/13/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. LOCKHEED - 3/21/96
50912 08/13/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. JULY CLAIMS SERVICES
50912 08/13/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. JULY CLAIMS SERVICES
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
50913 08/13/98 002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE PLANNING DEPT MEETING-?/23/98 001-161-999-5260
50913 08/13/98 002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE PLANNING DEPT MTGS-7/6 & 8/3 001-161-999-5260
20.00
728.15
1,315.31
29.10
176.10
2,153.46
205.20
50914 08/13/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING - CRC
50914 08/13/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING-SR CENTER
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
50.00
45.00
95.00
50915 08/13/98 002989 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA WINDOW CLEANING - CiTY HALL 340-199-701-5212
350.00
350.00
50916 08/13/98
COMMERCIAL PAVING AND C REFUND:OVERPAYMENT B.L.#012735 001-199-4056
20.00
20.00
50917 08/13/98 003328 COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, JUL LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-199-999-5246
50917 08/13/98 003328 COHPEX LEGAL SERVICES, JUL LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-199-999-5246
50917 08/13/98 003328 CUMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, JUL LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-199-999-5246
50917 08/13/98 003328 COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, JUL LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-199-999-5246
216.06
76.96
14.00
216.16
523.18
50918 08/13/98 002405 COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC COMPUTER EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES
50919 08/13/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS-PARKS
320-199-999-5215
190-180-999-5212
89.32
126.28
89.32
126.28
50920 08/13/98 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
50921 08/13/98 000609 DOUBLETREE HOTEL
JUL SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE
HTL:APA CF:N.F. & C.D. 9/16-18
300-2180
001-161-999-5258
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TENP HELP (2)g/E 7/3 DORAHOE 001-161-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/17 OONAHOE 001-161-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 7/3 YONKER 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)N/E 7/3 YONKER 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 7/17 YONKER 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)N/E 7/31YONKER 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S ! EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/31YONKER 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/03 CABRAL 001-171-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S ! EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/17 MEYERS 001-171-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/31DEGANGE 001-161-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC CREDIT: EDUCATION EXPENSE 001-140-999-5118
50922 08/13/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC CREOIT: EDUCATION EXPENSE 001-140-999-5118
ENTERTAINMENT ROUNDUP
AUGUST OLD TOWN ADVERTISING
50923 08/13/98 003319
280-199-999-5362
50924 08/13/98 ESTRADA, ROLANDO REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
50925 08/13/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSC IMPROV. - RANCHO SOLANA 193-180-999-5212
50925 08/13/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSC IMPROV. - CORTE CANTERA 193-180-999-5212
50925 08/13/98 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE LDSC IMPROV. - CORTE CANTERA 193-180-999-5212
50925 08/13/98 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE LDSC IMPROV. - CORTE CANTERA 193-180-999-5212
50926 08/13/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230
50926 0~/13/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
261.54
445.12
2,912.80
2,912.80
1,052.64
1,675.86
1,066.03
1,182.99
41.68
693.66
1,340.03
2,883.42
13.39-
13.39-
256.50
100.00
115.20
208.28
49.29
235.84
12.50
12.50
261.54
445.12
15,735.13
256.50
100.00
608.61
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 11:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50926 08/13/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES 001-163-999-5230
50926 08/13/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
50926 08/13/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230
10.75
75.00
37.50
148.25
50927 08/13/98 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT:FALLING CREEK 165-199-813-5804
50927 08/13/98 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT:39310 OAK CLIF 165-199-813-5804
150.00
150.00
300.00
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 4220 7824:JC:JULY 001-1170
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9798:dS:JULY 001-100-999-5258
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9277:RR:JULY 001-100-999-5258
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9277:RR:dULY 001-100-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9830:RB:dULY 001-1280
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9830:RB:dULY 001-110-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9830:RB:dULY 001-110-999-5263
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 5477 2590 4249 5288:SJ:JULY 001-120-999-5261
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 4249 5288:SJ:JULY 001-100-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9913:GR:JULY 001-1280
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3378 9913:GR:JULY 001-2661
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 5477 2590 3379 6165:GY:dULY 001-110-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 6165:GY:JULY 001-150-999-5220
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 6165:GY:dULY 001-150-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 6165:GY:dULY 001-150-999-5265
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 6165:GY:JULY 001-140-999-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 0432:AE:JULY 001-162-999-5263
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 3379 0556:dK:dULY 001-16~-604-5260
50928 08/13/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477 2590 0803 1143:HP:JULY 190-180-999-5261
50929 08/13/98 002894
FONTES, JOHNSON & ASSOC
RESIDENT'L REVIEW APPRAISALS
165-199-999-5250
50930 08/13/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-308-1079 JUL GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
50930 08/13/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-3980 JUL TCSD FIREWRKS 190-180-999-5208
50930 08/13/98 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-1409 dUL GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
50930 08/13/98 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-3539 JUL GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
50930 08/13/98 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-0590 dUL T.T.A. ALARM 320-199-999-5208
50931 08/13/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.H. JUL PROF CONSULTING SERVICES 001-110-999-5248
50931 08/13/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. JUL PROF CONSULTING SERVICES 001-16~-604-5248
50932 0~/13/98 GREENSTEIN, JAY REFUND:SOFTBALL NON-RES. FEE 190-183-~994
HARMON, JUDY
HARMON, JUDY
HYATT
I C B O, INC.
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
50933 08/13/98 002372
50933 08/13/98 002372
50934 08/13/98 001060
50935 08/13/98 000388
50936 08/13/98 001407
50937 08/13/98 002695
50937 08/13/98 002695
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
HTL MUNI. CF 9/29 G.THORNHILL
MEMBERSHIP DUES: A. ELMO 98/99
POOL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CRC
BLDG INSPECTOR SERVICES
PLAN CHECK SERVICES
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-161-999-5258
001-162-999-5226
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5248
22.65
116.33
501.28
45.92
519.70
33.10
23.01
68.04
121.76
245.86
202.00
51.11
53.44
170.00
50.96
30.00
14.95
84.14
363.54
1,200.00
56.68
362.33
126.48
38.35
57.11
500.00
500.00
10.OO
362.40
336.00
122.08
195.00
177.79
471.50
65.52
2,717.79
1,200.00
640.95
1,000.00
10.00
698.40
122.08
195.00
177.79
537.02
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50938
50939
50940
50941
50941
50941
50941
50942
50943
50944
50944
50945
50946
50947
50947
50948
50949
50949
50949
50949
50949
50950
50951
50952
50952
50952
50952
50952
50952
50953
50953
50953
50954
50954
11:49
CHECK
DATE
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002140
003181
001667
001667
001667
001667
001091
001282
000380
000380
002693
002693
001205
00138~
00138~
00138~
001384
00138~
003300
000915
002139
002139
002139
002139
002139
002139
002105
002105
00215
002216
002216
VENDOR
NAME
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JOHNSON, CINDY
dON EDNARDS & ASSOCIATE
KELLY TEMPOILRRY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT
KNORR SYSTEMS, INC
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
LIBERINO, CHRISTINE
MARNELL, MARK
MATROS, ANDREA
NATROS, ANDREA
MCDERMOTT, TIM K.
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MUSICAL AUDIO ENVIRONME
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TINES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
P F C UNLIMITED
P F C UNLIMITED
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QTRLY E-MAIL SUPPORT/MAINT.
REFUND:PARK RENTALS
PHOTOS FOR BUDGET/CIP COVERS
TEMP HELP W/E 6/28 FOWLER
TEMP HELP W/E 7/05 FO~LER
TEMP HELP W/E 7/12 FOWLER
TEMP HELP W/E 7/19 FOWLER
MAY CONSULTING SRVCS-PUJOL APT
MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
BUS SERV FOR TCSD EXCURSION
BUS SERV FOR TCSD EXCURSION
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REIMB:98 LEGISLATIVE SEMINAR
B/W BUSINESS CARDS:POLICE DEPT
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS - M. GILLISS
SALES TAX
STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS
TRAINING ON CRC SOUND SYSTEM
NOTARY EXAM:MICHAELA BALLREICH
1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION:PLANNING
VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
MONITOR SHADES IN CHAMBERS
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4988
001-140-999-5222
001-1990
001-110-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
165-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5212
190-183-999-5340
190-183-999-5340
190-183-4975
190-18~-4982
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-1990:'
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
190-180-999-5261
001-120-999-5226
001-161-999-5228
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-162-999-5214
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
ITEM
AHOUNT
300.00
25.00
216.50
477.75
416.00
422.50
260.00
4,346.89
246.69
229.06
276.48
25.00
40.00
352.80
48.00
40.47
38.25
2.96
38.25
2.96
41.21
180.00
72.00
78.00
95.39
104.34
70.46
62.33
84.01
215.38
35.95
15.95
313.50
24.30
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
300.00
25.00
216.50
1,576.25
4,346.89
246.69
505.54
25.00
40.00
400.80
40.47
123.63
180.00
72.00
494.53
267.28
337.80
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98 11:49
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50955 08/13/98
50955 08/13/98
PEFLEY, FRANK
PEFLEY, FRANK
REFUND: DAYCAMP & T-SHIRT
REFUND: DAYCAMP & T-SHIRT
190-183-4986
190-183-498~
20.00
275.00
295.00
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET%RE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESz RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESz RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50956 08/13/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
50958 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
50959 08/13/98
002861
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
PETSMART
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
POLICE K-9 FOO0 & SUPPLIES
RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
PUBLIC NOTICE:PASEO DEL SOL
PUBLIC NOTICE:PA97-0293
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0206
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0227
PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0205
PUBLIC NOTICE:98-11
PUBLIC NOTICE:98-12
PUBLIC NOTICE:10.28.010
PUBLIC NOTICE:DEV CODE
001-2130
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2130
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390~
280-2130
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
191-2130
192-2130
193-2130
194-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-170-999-5327
001-150-999-5254
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
322.43
11.78
21,821.07
447. ?2
2.51
3,509.20
13.31
32.58
405.13
195.43
.75
219.80
129.08
789.02
159.80
483.36
263.61
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
?0.84
13.45
.05
.16
1.65
1.05
.69
.46
1.86
1
2.24
144.81
1,533.47
84.00
19.00
17.75
18.00
7.50
8.25
8.50
8.00
18.75
28,957.63
144.81
1,723.22
50960 08/13/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 001-164-601-5610 1,750.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 11:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50960 08/13/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT SALES TAX 001-164~&01-5610
135.63
1,885.63
50961 08/13/98 002027 PRINCIPE AND ASSOCIATES UPDATE BIOLOGICAL STUDY:RC PRK 190-180-999-5250
1,250.00
1,250.00
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98000-0 PAUBA ROAD 001-171-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98010-0 PAUBA ROAD 001-171-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
50962 08/13/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240
94.50
38.43
12.37
444.73
11,644.32
160.19
1,470.40
367.57
237.13
4,688.37
531.85
19,689.86
50963 08/13/98 002985 RICK ENGINEERING COMPAN MAY SVS:SOLANA WY a MARG RD 210-165-681-5802
1,019.48
1,019.48
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR FEB PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR FEB PRKG C%TAT%ON ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR APR PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR APR PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIOE CO. AUDITOR AUG PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIOE CO. AUDITOR AUG PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR DEC PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265:
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR DEC PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260fr
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JAN PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JAN PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JUL PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JUL PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JUN PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIOE CO. AUDITOR JUN PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR MAR PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR MAR PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR MAY PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIOE CO. AUDITOR MAY PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR NOV PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
5096/, 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR NOV PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR OCT PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR OCT PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR SEPT PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
50964 08/13/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR SEPT PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
330.00
2,222.00
220.00
2,257.00
440.00
1,470.00
715.00
2,265.00
330.00
2,047.00
330.00
2,113.50
495.00
1,515.00
495.00
2,003.00
2~.00
1,470.00
330.00
1,140.00
385.00
1,702.50
385.00
1,634.00
26,569.00
50965 08/13/98 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R CERTIFIED COPY:TAX INSTALLMENT 001-120-999-5250
4.00
4.00
50966 08/13/98 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGSS:WINCH/I-15 PLANT WRK 280-199-602-5804
50966 08/13/98 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION JUL PRGSS:WINCH/[-15 280-2035
916.30
45.82-
870.48
50967 08/13/98 001919 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE 97/98 COMM SERV FUNDING PRGRM 001-101-999-5267
50968 08/13/98 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINTENANCE FOR TES 190-180-999-5212
5,000.00
55.60
5,000.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 11:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
50968 08/13/98 000403 SHANN SCOTT POOL & SPA PODL MAINTENANCE FOR TES
190-180-999-5212
620.00
675.60
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-B&S 001-162-999-5242
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO SALES TAX 001-162-999-5242
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-TCC 190-184-999-5250
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-CITY HAL 340-199-701-5250
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-MAINT.FA 340-199-702-5250
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC - PW 001-164-604-5215
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-SR CTR 190-181-999-5250
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-CRC 190-182-999-5250
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER TRAINING 001-150-999-5261
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-B&S 001-162-999-5214
50969 08/13/98 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-TCSD 190-180-999-5250
95.80
7.42
22.50
67.50
37.50
74.96
22.50
67.50
125.81
52.48
202.43
776.40
50970 08/13/98 002855 SHESHUNOFF INFO. SERVIC UP-DATES FOR GOVT BUDGET HDBK 001-1990
256.95
256.95
50971 08/13/98 003297 SKATE CITY DAYCAMP EXCURSION:8/6/98 190-18~-999-5340
172.50
172.50
50972 08/13/98 000645 SFLRRT & FINAL, INC. DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
190-183-999-5340
85.08
85.08
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-14-204-1615 FRONT ST 340-199-701-5240
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-2153 PUJOL 190-184-999-5240
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA 190-182-999-5240
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-671-5518 PALA TC1 191-180-999-5319
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 192-180-999-5319
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
50973 08/13/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 2-10-901-7962 YUKON TC1 191-180-999-5319
1,358.99
48.72
1,235.57
5,270.45
152.16
24,284.06
8,852.94
138.80
41,341.69
50974 08/13/98 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS:PALA 210-165-689-5804
148.74
148.74
50975 08/13/98 002361 SOUTHERN CALIF FPO~S MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:WINDSOR,H. 001-171-999-5226
45.00
45.00
50976 08/13/98 003256 SPECTRA TURF, INC. REPAIR PLAY SURFACE 8 R.C. PRK 190-180-999-5212
1,725.00
1,725.00
5097'/ 08/13/98 ST. NICKOLAS GREEK ORTH REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
50978 08/13/98 001696 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLY FOLD TABLE FOR SR ENG OFFICE 001-165-999-5242
43.09
43.09
50979 08/13/98 STEPHENS-SOWERS, MELANI REFUND: MEN~S GOLF LESSON 190-183-4982
45.00
45.00
50980 08/13/98 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
REIMB:LEAGUE OF CITIES:7/22-26 001-100-999-5258
686.16
50981 08/13/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT 001-164-601-5218
50981 08/13/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID KITS 001-162-999-5242
50981 08/13/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SALES TAX 001-162-999-5242
50981 08/13/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT 001-164-601-5218
89.42
135.00
17.43
75.43
317.28
50982 08/13/98 003325 T C I MEDIA SERVICES
50983 08/13/98 000305 TARGET STORE
CABLE ADVERTISING: OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
MISC. CAMERA & OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
2,714.00
49.92
2,714.00
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
50983
5098~
50985
50985
50985
50986
50987
50988
50989
50989
50989
50989
50989
50989
50989
50990
50991
50991
50991
50992
50993
50994
50995
50996
50997
50997
50998
50998
50998
50999
51000
51001
11:49
CHECK
DATE
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000305
003318
000825
000825
000825
001672
000515
000311
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
VENDOR
NAME
TARGET STORE
TARTAGLIA, MARLO
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER
TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TENECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
003092 TIMBERLAKE PAINTING
000320
000320
000320
000459
TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS
TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS
TO,ME CENTER STATIONERS
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G
U S FISH & WILDLIFE SER
002396 U S LONG DISTANCE, INC.
000?92 UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E
003186 URBAN LOGIC CONSULTANTS
002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS
002566 VALLEY MICRO CC~4PUTERS
000332
000332
000332
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
003114 WASKA, CAROLYN
001342
000341
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES,INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]00S
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC. CAMERA & OFFICE SUPPLIES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MOTORCYCLE HELMET FOR POLICE
SALES TAX
REPAIRS ON POLICE MOTORCYCLES
PLUMBING SERVICES - CITY HALL
MARKETING PROMOTIONS
TVHS 1998 FALL SPORTS POSTER
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CiTY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
STAIN CABINETS IN CHAMBERS
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT FOR RETURNEO ITEMS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MIGRATORY BIRD PRMT:DUCK PONO
LONG DISTANCE TELECUM PROVIDER
ECONOMIC OEVEL MGMT:9/22-11/24
dUL GEOTECHNICAL SVS:MARG PRK
PRINTER & SUPPLIES
SALES TAX
JULY 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES
JULY 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES
dULY 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
JUNE ENGINEER SVS:DUCK POND
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-604-5220
190-18~-999-5330
001-170-~-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5214
340-199-701-5212
001-101-999-5280
001-100-999-5250
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-16~-604-5263
001-16~-601-5263
001-170-999-5262
340-199-701-5212
001-164-604-5220
001-163;~-5220
001-1~-604-5220
190-1990
190-180-~-5250
320-199-999-5208
001-161-999-5261
210-190-119-5804
320-1970
320-1970
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
190-183-999-5330
340-199-701-5212
210-190-i43-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
149.76
160.00
159.95
12.40
]'5.37
47.00
135.77
185.00
579.68
174.50
195.97
97.99
97.99
498.8~
22.45
300.00
188.51
32.66
13.20-
312.00
25.00
1,588.23
257.00
2,002.00
1,660.00
128.65
2,429.60
3,397.04
2,733.98
136.80
49.74
3,233.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
199.68
160.00
247.72
47.00
135.77
185.00
1,667.41
300.00
207.97
312.00
25.00
1,588.23
257.00
2,002.00
1,788.65
8,560.62
136.80
49.74
3,233.00
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51002
51003
51004
51005
11:49
CHECK
DATE
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
08/13/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000570
000915
000418
00Z361
VENDOR
NAME
WIMBERLY, VALERIE
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA
RIVERSIDE GO. CLERK & R
SOUTHERN CALIF FPO~S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REIMB FOR REFRESHMENT 8/4 MTG
NOTARY EXAM: SUSAN JONES
ADMIN FEE:PA98-0205 ANNEXATION
NFPA 7Z/W CA:WINDSOR:10/20/98
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5260
001-120-999-5226
001-110-999-5307
001-171-999-5261
ITEM
AHOUNT
74.70
40.00
78.00
35.00
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
74.70
40.00
78.00
35.00
352,924.78
VOUCHREZ
08/13/98
12:28
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
150 AB 2766 FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOg/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUNO
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
AMOUNT
62,298.89
22,128.47
5,132.50
41,711.21
8,813.00
852,554.68
600,599.87
12,487.92
518.00
TOTAL 1,606,244.54
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/13/98 12:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
51008 08/25/98 003213 A M S PLANNING RESEARCH JUN SRVCS-CULTURAL ARTS PLAN 190-180-999-5248 7,000.00
7,000.00
51009 08/25/98 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT JUN PROF SRVCS-R.CAL/I-15 BRDG 210-165-601-5801 25,123.50 25,123.50
51010 08/25/98 003278 C H J INCORPORATED JUL ENG SRVCS-STREETSCAPE PRJC 280-199-824-5804 6~538.50 6,538.50
51011 08/25/98 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - POLICE 001-170-999-5215 753.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 CUMTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - PW ADMIN 001-16/,-604-5215 417.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 CONTRONIX OF HENET MAINT. CITY RADIOS -PW MAINT 001-164-601-5215 1,289.50
51011 08/25/98 000447 CUMTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - LAND DEV 001-163-999-5215 390.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 COHTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - PW CZP 001-165-999-5215 363.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 CONTRON[X OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS -BUILD/SAFE 001-162-999-5215 1,728.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 CUMTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5215 1,851.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 COt4TRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - INFO SYS 320-199-999-5215 518.00
51011 08/25/98 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET MAINT. CITY RADIOS - TCSD 190-180-999-5215 1,625.00
8,934.50
51012 08/25/98 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC PRGSS PMT #.4-NARG. COMM. PARK 210-190-119-5804 129,019.18
51012 08/25/98 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC C/O #1 PRGSS PftT #~, MARG. PARK 210-190-119-5804 9,401.31
51012 08/25/98 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, lNC RETENTION W/H PNT #4 MARG PARK 210-2035 13,842.05-
124,578.44
51013 08/25/98 003152 EDISON EV EDISON EV CHARGING STATION 150-199-698-5804 10,201.27
51013 08/25/98 003152 EDISON EV EDISON EV CHARGING STATION 150-199-698-5804 11,927.20
22,128.47
51014 08/25/98 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
JUN PLAN CHECKING SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 12,576.45
12,576.45
51015 08/25/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JULY LDSC MAINTENANCE SERVICES 190-180-999-5415 8,961.00
51015 08/25/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JULY LOSC MAINTENANCE SERVICES 193-180-999-5415 8,813.00
17,774.00
51016 08/25/98 001550 GROSSMONT BANK RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT-EDGE 210-1035 13,842.05
13,842.05
51017 08/25/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN BLDG INSPECTOR SERVICES 001-162-999-5118
51017 08/25/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN CREDIT:INVOICE TOTAL INCORRECT 001-162-999-5118
6,853.00
270.00-
6,583.00
51018 08/25/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES JUL-SEPT SPECIAL DIST ADMIN SV 190-180-999-5370 11,707.94
11,707.94
51019 08/25/98 003178 NEW WEST SIGNAL INSTALL TRAF SIGNAL a FIRE #84 210-1990 25,465.55
51019 08/25/98 003178 NEW WEST SIGNAL RETENTION:STATION ~84 SIGNALS 210-2035 2,546.55-
22,919.00
51020 08/25/98 002498 PETRA GEOTECHN[CAL, INC JUNE SVS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 IMPRV 210-165-601-5801 15,680.00
15,680.00
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
51021 08/25/98 002412 RICHARDS
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 9,769.7-/
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 863.50
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 5,757.75
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 190-180-999-5246 2,098.25
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 577.50
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 2,463.00
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 90.00
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2641 1,369.25
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 210-165-631-5801 10,976.10
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 25.00
WATSON & GERS JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 1,8~1.50
VOUCHRE2
08/13/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51021
51023
51023
51023
51024
51025
51025
51025
51025
51025
51025
51025
51025
51026
51026
51026
51026
51026
51027
51028
51029
51029
12:28
CHECK
DATE
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
O8/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
08/25/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002181
002181
002181
003282
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
003149
003149
003149
003149
003149
000420
003331
003261
003261
VENDOR
NAME
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, UATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, ~ATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, UATSON & GERS
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION-
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
UNION BNK OF CA FBO:VLL
VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,
VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE 98 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL PRGSS: RANCHO/I-15 PRJT
JUL PRGSS:CO~5 RANCHO/I-15 PRJ
RETENTION W/H:JUL PRGS RAN/f15
REL RETENTION TO ESCROW:980703
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
USE OF ATHLETIC FIELDS AT TMS
JUNE PRGSS:WINCHESTER CRK PRJT
JUNE PRGSS:~INCHESTER CRK PRJT
JULY PRGSS:UINCHESTER CRK PRJT
RETENTION:JUNE PRGSS:~INCH CRK
RETENTION:JUL PRGSS:~INCH CRK
JUNE PRGSS:OVRLD DR &MARG RD
REL:RETENTION INV# 003~497
JUL PRGSS:OLD TWN STREETSCAPE
RETENTION:JUL PRGSS:OLD T~N ST
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
300-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-1990
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-1280
300-199-999-5246
001-1280
001-1280
300-199-~-5246
280-199-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
165-1990
210-165-601-5804
210-165-601-5804
210-2035
210-1035
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-163-~99-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-164-604-5263
001-170-999-5262
190-180-999-5415
210-190-149-5804
210-190-149-5804
210-190-149-5804
210-2035
210-2035
210-165-681-5802
280-1035
280-199-824-5804
280-2035
ITEM
AMOUNT
I, 009.59
54. O0
2,682.83
58.50
501.00
3,340.25
743. O0
51.00
3,457.33
3,605.37
268.75
3,338.75
468. O0
2,001.50
2,428.77
354.50
5,132.50
282,940.37
6,804.69
28,974.51-
28,974.51
2,319.02
542.04
368.93
141.29
3,054.19
377.48
24.79
8,000.00
15,083.03
192,725.02
169,925.88
20,780.81-
16,992.59-
9,730. O0
59,127.81
591,278.10
59,127.81-
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
65,317.26
260,770.55
28,974.51
14,827.74
339,960.53
9,730.00
59,127.81
532,150.29
TOTAL CHECKS
1,606,244.54
ITEM
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Managed City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance"~";'J/'"
DATE:
August 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Fire
Protection Agreement with Riverside County and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
amendment, final form to be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND: Attached is the Second Amendment to the Fire Services Contract with
Riverside County. Each year it is necessary to update the contract in accordance with the City's
approved budget for Fire Services. This agreement provides for the level of service delivery as
authorized by the City Council and approved with the 1998-99 Operating Budget.
The Second Amendment to the Agreement reflects the City's 50% funding for the staffing of the
French Valley Fire Station No. 83. On April 14, 1998 the City Council approved the shared cost of
operating this fire station with the County of Riverside.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are appropriated in the Fire Department budget for the fiscal
year 1998-99 Fire Services contract amount of $2,033,300.
Attachment:
Second Amendment to Cooperative Agreement
R.'WOR TONL ~AGENDASV:IRE AGREEMENT AGENDA DOC 8/ ~ 7/98
SECOND AMENDMENT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION,
RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into by the CITY OF TEMECULA
and the County of Riverside.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, The parties heretofore entered into an agreement entitled "A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION,
RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA~ (the "AGREEMENT") dated
September 23, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the parties are requesting an amendment to said agreement attachment
Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this amendment is to update the rates.
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein
contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. AMENDMENT. The parties agree that Exhibit "A" of the agreement is hereby
amended to provide as follows:
The attached Exhibit "A" shall be in place for the Fiscal Year 1998~99.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Second Amendment shall become effective upon
execution by all of the above-mentioned parties.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the City has caused this agreement to be signed and sealed
and the County of Riverside by order of its Board of Supervisors, made ,
has caused this agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and sealed and
attested by the Clerk of the Board, all on the day and year first above written.
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST: BY:
By: TITLE:
TITLE:
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:
CLERK Of THE BOARD
BY:
CHAIRMAN, BOARD Of SUPERVISORS
07/28/98
TEMECULA STAFFING LEVEL
FISCAL YEAR 1998199 - 3 PERSON ENGINE CO.
4 PERSON TRUCK CO.
"ESTIMATE"
SERVICE
DELIVERY I - CAPT.
COST 1.6 - ENG.
5.2
FF II
EXHIBIT "A"
TOTAL
STA. #12 228,219 208,039 345,437 781,694
STA. #73 238,893 208,039 345,437 792,368
STA. #84 230,434 208,039 345,437 783,910
STA ~83-50% City (~ 10 me
1 - CAPT.
2.0 - ENG.
6.0
FF II
99,539 99,300 166,075
SUBTOTAL
364,914
$2,722,886
TRUCK COMPANY (50%)
I - BATTALION CHIEF
1 - FIRE MARSHALL (B/C)
3 - FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST
1 - FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR
3 - CAPT. 3 - ENG.
130,372 113,554
6 - FF II's
199,290
64,181 lEA
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
443,216
110,082
110,082
192,543
56,346
$912,269
TOTAL DOLLARS FOR STAFFING
TEMECULA TAX CREDIT
NET CITY BILLING
TAX CREDIT: FIRE TAXES
REDEV. TAXE~
TOTAL
SERVICE DEUVERYCOSTS:
SUPPORT SERVICES
Administration
Fire Prevention
Automotive
Dispatch
Training
Data Processing
Haz. Materials Team
Communications
Accounting
Personnel
Public Affairs
Procurement
Volunteer Support
Emergency Services
1,438,844
163,011
1,601,855
OPERATING SERVICES
Telephone
Radio Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
Utilrdes
Vehicle Maintenance
Fire Engine
Fire Engine Maint.
Fire Fighting Equip.
Training
First Aid Supplies
Office Supplies/Equip.
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Fire Engines
$3,635,155
(1,601,855)
2,033,300
ITEM
5
APPROVAL /~/h~~ -
CITY ATTORNEY I'~'l
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~;~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building OfficiaV~
August 25, 1998
Approval of Contracts for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1. An Agreement for Consultant Services with Esgil Corporation, to perform plan review, for the
Building and Safety Department, for a term of three (3) years, to June 30, 2001.
An Agreement for Consultant Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates, to perform Plan
Review Services for the Building and Safety Department, for a term of three (3) years to June
30, 2001.
DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department has experienced a continued increase in
plan review activity over the past several years. To be responsive to this increased plan review
workload, the services of Esgil Corporation and VanDorpe Chou and Associates has been utilized.
Due to the nature of the building industry, its activity fluctuations and the rapid growth the City is
experiencing, accurate estimation of fiscal year plan review activity is difficult. Over the past
several years, requests have been made to Council for additional appropriation of funds for plan
review services, beyond that approved in the department's operating budget
It is projected that the need for plan review services will continue to increase over the next three
(3) years. Over the past three (3) years, the cost of this service has totaled $590,569. The cost
of this service is fully supported by plan review fee revenue collected by the City. The approval of
this recommendation will expedite the consent process and eliminate time consuming
administrative requirements, Council action, and ultimately would result in better customer service.
FISCAL IMPACT: $200,000 has been appropriated in the 1998-99 budget and should be
adequate for the first year of these contracts.
ATTACHMENT: Agreement 1) VanDorpe Chou and Associates
Agreement 2) Esgil Corporation
R:\BROCK~EI\AGEArDA\ESGILVAN.DOC ] 8/18/98
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 1, 1998, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Esgil Corporation, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1998, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 31, 2001, unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ,
at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for
actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for
services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement,
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such
failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a
default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with
written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which
-1-
R:kBROCKMElkAGMTS~ESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 ¢b
to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its
default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy
to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs,
expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail
to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall
provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and
records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make
transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and
activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained
for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement,
all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents
prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become
the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City,
upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that
specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemni~,, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of
the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
-2-
R:~BROCKlv~IXAGMTS~ESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form .with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of
the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
-3-
R:'~BROCKMEIXAGMTSXESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all
times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees
or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City,
or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for
City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from
the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of
support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work
performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to
a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such
court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request
for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena
from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project
or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant
and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
R:XBROCKMEIXAGMTS~ESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb
Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to
control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as
that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Esgil Corporation
9320 Chesapeake Dr. #208
San Diego, CA 92123
Attention: Richard Esgate, President
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be the value of the City of the
services rendered.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have
in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws
of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City
of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party
as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged
into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation
of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority
to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
-5-
R:~BROCKMEI~GMTS~ESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones,CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter Thorson
City Attorney
Consultant
ESGIL CORPORATION
Richard Esgate, President
Esgil Corporation
R:'xBROCKMEBAGMTSXESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb -6-
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
PLAN CHECKING
Provide a complete plan check service to the City of Temecula including analysis for compliance with
the City's adopted uniform codes as follows:
Building code requirement including:
· Requirements based upon type of occupancy
· Requirements based upon type of construction
· Engineering regulations including seismic loads
· Detailed regulations of construction
· Fire resistive standards for fire protection
· Fire and life safety requirements
· Accessibility to the physically handicapped
National Electrical Code requirements
Uniform Plumbing Code requirements
Title 24 energy conservation compliance
City's amendments to the uniform codes.
-7-
R:~BROCKMEI~GMTS~ESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
COMPLETE PLAN CHECK:
Esgil Corporation's fee shall be 52% of the Building Permit Fee calculated per Table 3-A of the 1991
edition of the Uniform Administrative Code for each building plan checked. The construction
valuation shall be based on the most recent valuation multiplier published by the International
Conference of Building Officials in Building Standards or on the architects; estimated construction
cost, or on the Building Official's cost estimate, whichever is greater.
Not withstanding the above, the minimum contractor fee for plan checking a proposed project shall
be one hundred dollars ($100.00).
Plan check fee for repetitive identical buildings shall be 52% of the building permit fee as noted
above for the first, or basic building, and 15% of the building permit fee as noted above for each
additional building.
The single fee includes all rechecks and there are no additional charges for preliminary plan check
conferences at our office, expedited processing, checking plans that are eventually found to be
incomplete or for the pick-up and delivery of plans or for meetings with the Building Official at
his/her request.
PARTIAL PLAN CHECK:
Partial plan checks are discouraged due to the need to coordinate all disciplines in a plan review,
however, the fees for partial plan checks are:
1. Basic minimum for any plan check 50% of 1991 UBC plan check fee
2. Structural only 10% additional
3. Fire-Life 10%additional
4. U.P.C. 2% additional
5. N.E.C. 2% additional
6. U.M.C. 2% additional
7. Title 24 Energy and Sound Control 2% additional
8. Title 24 Disabled Access 2% additional
PLAN CHECK OF REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS:
Revisions to previously approved plans will be at Esgil Corporation's published hourly rate shown
on the "Labor Rates Schedule."
R:XBROCKMEBAGMTS'xESGIL.WPD 8/4/98 cb -8-
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 1, 1998, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and VanDorpe Chou Associates Inc., ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1998, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 31, 2001, unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competenfiy and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ,
at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for
actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for
services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement,
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such
failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a
default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with
written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which
-1-
R:~BROCKMEIX, AGMTS\VANDORPE. WPD 8/6/98 ¢b
to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its
default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy
to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs,
expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail
to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall
provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and
records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make
transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, dam, documents, proceedings and
activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained
for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement,
all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents
prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become
the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City,
upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that
specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of
the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of Califomia and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
-2-
R:~BROCKMEI'~AGMTS\VANDORPE.WPD 8/6/98 cb
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of
the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
R:'xBROCKMEBAGMTSWANDORPE.WPD 8/6/98 cb -3-
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all
times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees
or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City,
or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for
City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indenmification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from
the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of
support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work
performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to
a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such
court order or subpoena.
-4-
R:~BROCKMEI3AGMTS\VANDORPE. WPD 8/6/98 cb
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request
for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena
from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project
or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant
and/or be present at any deposition, heating or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, City's tight to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to
control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as
that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
VanDorpe Chou Associates, Inc.
295 N. Rampert St.
Orange, CA 92668
Attention: Neil Evans
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be the value of the City of the
services rendered.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have
in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws
of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City
of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party
as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged
into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation
of any and all facts such party deems material.
-5-
R:\BROCKMEr,,AGMTS\VANDORPE.WPD 8/6/98 cb
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority
to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Attest:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones,CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
VanDorpe Chou Associates Inc
By
Neil Evans, P. E.
-6-
R:~BROCKMEI~GMTS~VANDORPE.WPD 8/6/98 cb
ITEM
6
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
.~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
/
August 25, 1998
Tract Map No. 23371-10, Located South of La Serena Drive West of
Temeku Drive
PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ward B. Maxwell, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 23371-10 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and
Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23371 was approved by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. Tentative Tract No. 23371, which is part
of the Margarita Specific Plan No. 199, was granted an initial extension of time on November
8, 1990. An amendment processed in the fall of 1997, between the City and McMillin Project
Services, Inc., extends the life of the tentative map until November 8, 2000. The Developer
has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval.
Tract Map No. 23371-10 is a twenty five (25) lot single family residential subdivision, of 5.54
net acres, located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive. The site is currently
vacant.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23371-10:
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of occupancy permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Location Map
Tract Map No. 22271-10
~TEMEC_FS201~DATNDEPTS~:~N~GD RPT~98\0825~23371-10.AGN.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: 23371-10
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Public Facility Development Impact Fee
Quimby Fees
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid
To be paid prior to issuance of occupancy
permit
Pursuant to Amendment No. 3 of the
Margarita Village Specific Plan, the Park
Land dedication requirement (Quimby) for
this tract shall be satified through the
future construction and dedication of a
community park facility at the southwest
corner of La Serena Way and Meadows
Parkway.
2 t~TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS~PW~GDRPT~98~0825~25371-10~,GN. DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23371-10
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Monument
TOTAL
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
~ 83,000
$ 27,000
$ 33,000
$ 14,803
$ 157,803
DATE: August 25, 1998
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ 41,500
$ 13,500
$ 16,500
71,500
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
* T.B.D. - To Be Determined
90.00
$15,762.00
$T.B.D.*
130.00
8.00
1,330.00
0.00
250.00
1,718.00
0,00
3 R:~AGDRPT~98~0825~23371-10.AGN.0OC
TRACT 23371- 10
RANCHO
TEMECULA ~A~
CALIFORNIA / ~
~ TEMECULA
N.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
"' I
-i
I I
I {
ITEM
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANC/~
CITY MANAGER ~-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
ugust 25, 1998
Tract Map No. 23371-9, Located South of La Serena Drive West of
Temeku Drive
PREPARED BY: ~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ward B. Maxwell, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 23371-9 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and
Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23371 was approved by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. Tentative Tract No. 23371, which is part
of the Margarita Specific Plan No. 199, was granted an initial extension of time on November
8, 1990. An amendment processed in the fall of 1997, between the City and McMillin Project
Services, Inc., extends the life of the tentative map until November 8, 2000. The Developer
has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval.
Tract Map No. 23371-9 is a sixty seven (67) lot single family residential subdivision, of 11.64
net acres, located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive. The site is currently
vacant.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23371-9:
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of occupancy permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Location Map
Tract Map No. 22271-9
1 R:~AGDRPT~98~0825~23371-9.AGN.D0C
TRACT 23371- 9
RANCHO
~ TEMECULA
N.T.S.
VIC]:N[TY MAP
J~
- 1%. !1
, J j! j j!J J~ J J j J
/
/
/
1
ITEM
8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCI.~-.~/'Z~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
(~~,. oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 25, 1998
Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 24133-5
(located westerly of Montelegro Way, between McCabe Drive and Leena
Way)
PREPARED BY:/~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 24133-5
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety
BACKGROUND: On January 27, 1996, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
24133-5, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreement with:
KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, L.L.C.
for the improvement of street and drainage, water and sewer systems, subdivision
monumentation, and traffic signalization mitigation fees. The securities were posted by The
Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, as follows:
1. Bond No. 100869980-96-003 in the amount of $1,087,500 ($725,000,
$172,500, and $190,000 for street and drainage, water, and sewer
improvements, respectively) for Faithful Performance,
2. Bond No. 100869980-960-3 in the amount of $544,000 ($362,500, $86,500,
and $95,000 for street and drainage, water, and sewer improvements,
respectively) for Labor and Materials.
3. Bond No, 100869980-96-004 in the amount of $26,700 for subdivision
monumentation.
4. Bond No. 100869980-96-005 in the amount of $18,300 for traffic signalization
mitigation.
I R:~AGOR~2~TR241335.MON.DOC
Z4
¥1¢INITT M^~
TRACT NO. 2,4133
Tracts No. P.4133-~
NOTF~: MAPS NOT TO SC. AI,F~
ITEM
9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of City Engineer/City Engineer
August 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Release Subdivision Monumentation security in Tract No. 27827-1
(Northwesterly Corner of Intersection of North General Kearny Road at
Nicolas Road)
PREPARED BY: ~/g)/ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
/~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Subdivision Monumentation security in Tract No 27827-1.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 27827-1 on August 23,
1994, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreement with:
Coscan Homes California, Inc., a California Corporation
Doing Business as Coscan Davidson Homes.
12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, water and sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. The
bonds were posted by Reliance Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. B2380578/111058 in the amount of $394,000 ($302,000, $47,000,
and $45,000, respectively) for street, water and sewer system improvements.
Bond No. B2380578/111058 in the amount of $197,000 ($151,500, $23,500,
and $22,500, respectively) for street, water and sewer system labor and
materials.
Bond No. B2482283/111062 in the amount of $13,608 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
r.~Lqs~0714~r278271 .acc
VICINITY UAP
TRACT NO. 27827-1
Location-Map
ITEM
10
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: ~-~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 25, 1998
SUBJECT: Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-F
(Northwesterly Corner of Intersection of North General Kearny Road at
Nicolas Road)
PREPARED BY:/~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-F
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 27827-F on June 13,
1995, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreement with:
Coscan Homes California, Inc., a California Corporation
Doing Business as Coscan Davidson Homes.
12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of street and drainage, water and sewer system, and subdivision
monumentation. The bonds were posted by Reliance Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. B2482440/111155 in the amount of $340,500 ($220,000, $67,000,
and $53,500, respectively) for street and drainage, and water and sewer system
improvements.
Bond No. B2482449/111155 in the amount of $197,000 ($151,500, $23,500,
and $22,500, respectively) for street, water and sewer system labor and
materials.
Bond No. B2482453/111156 in the amount of $13,392 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
-1- r:~agdrpt\96\O709\tt278271 .red
Bond No. 2482452/111156 in the amount of $34,050 to cover faithful
Performance Warranty amount
On July 14, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized release of the Faithful Performance Security. The developer
has posted the following Faithful Performance warranty bond which will be retained for the one-
year warranty period:
Bond No. B2482452/111156 for Faithful Performance Warranty $34,050
The developer is required to post Labor and Material security to assure payment to providers
of materials and labor. This security is retained for the contractual six-month lien period
following City Council acceptance of the public improvements.
Staff has reviewed the subdivision monumentation and is satisfied. Staff therefore
recommends release of the following security:
Bond No. B2482453/111156 in the amount of $13,392 for Subdivision
Monumentation.
The affected public streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City
Council Resolution No. 98-60 on July 14, 1998.. The streets within the subdivision are
portions of Parkside Drive, Sarah Drive, Warbler Drive, Tischa Drive, and two alleys.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
R:~AGDRPT~98\0525\TR27827F.MON.XX)C
TRACT MAP NO.
_ ',ocation Mat~
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO
ITEM
11
APPROVA~ ~/h
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~'E .,'~.~
CITY MANAGER ~,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Easement Deeds, Offers of Dedication, and Rights of Entry
and Temporary Construction Agreements for the Promenade Mall
Infrastructure Off-Site, Storm Drain, and Related Purposes (Southwesterly of
Margarita Road at Winchester Road)
PREPARED B onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
/~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN EASEMENT DEEDS FOR SLOPE
AND STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES, OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD PURPOSES,
AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENTS FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is acquiring certain parcels for Rights-Of-Way,
slope easements, storm drain easements, rights-of-entry and temporary construction
agreements, and traffic signal maintenance easements, all relating to the infrastructure
improvements required for the Promenade Mall Project.
The underlying fee owner of the affected land and grantor of the several rights in land is
LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation
The several documents include offers of dedication for rights of way along portions of Ynez
Road, Margarita Road, and Overland Avenue, slope easements along Margarita Road and
Overland Avenue, storm drain easements abutting portions of the Promenade Mall site, and
rights of entry and temporary construction agreements along Overland Avenue and Margarita
Road.
These several easements, offers of dedication, and rights of entry and temporary
construction agreements were obtained as a condition of closing escrow by Forest City
Development California, Inc., a California Corporation. These need to be accepted by the City
R:IAGDRP7~981O8251MALLEASMNT. DOC
and recorded to facilitate construction activities for the Promenade Mall.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 98- , with Exhibits 1 through 10, and accompanying Exhibits "A" and "B".
2. Easements, offers of dedication, and agreements (On file)
R:IAGDRP7~9810825[MALLEASMNT. DOC
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN EASEMENT DEEDS
FOR SLOPE AND STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, OFFERS OF DEDICATION
FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENTS
FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that the construction of the storm drain, street, and related improvements requires acquisition
of certain parcels of land to facilitate the construction of and maintenance of said storm drains,
streets, and related facilities for the Promenade Mall Site; and,
WREREAS, the City Staff and consultants have negotiated with the affected owners and/or
their agents to acquire parcels of land which facilitate the proposed Promenade Mall and related street
improvements; and,
WHEREAS, City Staff and the Promenade Mall Developer, Forest City Development
California, Inc., a California Corporation, has successfully negotiated with underlying fee owners
and has obtained Easements for Slope, Storm Drain, and Traffic Signal Maintenance Purposes, Offers
of Dedication for Road Purposes, and Rights of Entry and Temporary Construction Agreements for
a portion of the required rights of way and related easements from LDA-7, Inc., an Illinois
Corporation; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept the
Easement Deeds for Slope, Storm Drain, and Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes, Offers of
Dedication for Road Purposes, and Rights of Entry and Temporary Construction Agreements, as
offered by LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, for the purposes stated therein, but does not desire
to accept the several parcels for maintenance purposes at this time
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts Easement Deeds for Slope, Storm Drain, and Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes,
Offers of Dedication for Road Purposes, and Rights of Entry and Temporary Construction
Agreements, as offered by LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, in substantially the form attached
hereto as Exhibits 1 through 10, each with appropriate Exhibits "A" and "B" for the purposes stated
therein, but not for street or other maintenance purposes at this time. The City Engineer is hereby
authorized to make minor modifications to the legal descriptions on said documents.
IITEMEC_FS20IIDATAIDEPTSIPVV1AGDRP7~9810825[MALLEASMNT. DOC
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City o£Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 25th day of August, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 25th day of August, 1998, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
AB SENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
I I T£MEC_FS201 iDA TA IDEPTSIPW~A GDRP7~98108251MALLEA SMNT. DOC
It is 'ond~rsUx~l and. agreed that the City of Temecula and its succe~ors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such of~r of dedication, and shall not assun~ any respomibilit~ for the offered parcel'b~ land or any imptOrCh.mS tiercon
or therein, until such offe~ has bccn accepted by sppropriatc a~on of the City Council, or of the Iocel ~r.r,~ bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof ~ inuze to the benefit of and be binding upon hclrs, successors, assigns, and pcrsomi
representatives of the respecdve parties hezem.
m ~ ~ ~s) m~ ~) ~ ~ m ~ ~.
~ ~ NOTARYPUBLIC, STATEOFiLUNOiS
ai~ ~-~-~ ~ : MY Commission Expires Jan. 4. 2001
ACC~ANCE C~R~CA~
~ C~ ~, C~ ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ve.
LGA-7, Inc., an Illinoi: corporation
Print Nm and T~k
Its:~RLTE~ L. L~.rT~'
CITY OF 'I'EM]~ULA
BY:
Susan W. 3raM, CMC
~ cid, cm,t
APPROV'BD AS TO FORM:
BY:
P. tsr M. Thorson, City AttorMy
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Atl ~ FOR ALL THE PURPOSES OF A PUBLIC STREET OVER A PORTION OF ADJUSTED
PARCEL 'A' OF LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31, INSTRUMENT NO. 278787, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNL~ BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID ADJUSTED PARCEL 'A';
THENCE NORTH 44'54'58' EAST, ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
SAID ADJUSTED PARCEL "A" AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY MNE OF LOT 115 PER MAP OF
TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 8, PAGE 359 IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 16.53 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTION WITH A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCENTRIC WITH AND DIb"TANT 81.00 FEET
NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE CENTERUNE OF YNEZ ROAD AS SHOWN ON
PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 FILED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK ~2.. PAGES ?.v~/THROUGH ~ , IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID CENTERUNE BEING A
CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1200 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CONCENTRIC CURVE, FROM A
TANGENT BEARING OF SOUTH 13"09~.5' EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°56'20" ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 65.71 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT UNF,
SAID TANGENT LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 81.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY,
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID CENTERUNE;
THENCF~ ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 10°13~05" EAST A DISTANCE OF 194.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"20%~7' WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.87 FEET TO A POINT IN A UNE PARALLEL WITH
AND DISTANT 67.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED'AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID
CENTERMN~ ..
THENCE, ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL UNE, NORTH 10'13'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF
178.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 1267.00 FEET;
THENCE, NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 2'32'37' ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 56.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 3,467 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT q~", ATrACHED.
H.'~IAWTHO-I~EAS EME- I~;D~.A31A.WI=D
16. 1998 (10:42am)
SAN
\
\ ]PO.B
LOT ] J5
'TEMEDULA LAND'
AND WATER COJVJPANY
MB 8/35':)
DIEGO COUNTY
/' LOT LINE
~,//TANGENT BEAR
EXHIBIT "B"
54' 58" E
16.5:3'
267. O0
-~--2' :52' 37'
L=56.25'
T=28. I :5'
PORTION OF
ADJUSTMENT. NO. 31
ADJUSTED PARCEL "A"
L,LoA, NO, 31
R= !'281.00'
~,=2' 56' 20'
L-65.71'
T=:52.86'
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
..Tr FOR ALl_ THE PURPOSES OF A PUBUC STREET OVER A PORTION OF LOT 115 PER
MAP OF TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY FILED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359 OF MAPS IN THE
OFFICE OFTHE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CONCENTRIC CURVE, FROM A TANGENT' BEARING OF
SOUTH 27°52'30- EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'4305' A DISTANCE OF 329.06 FEET TO
A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY UNE OF SAID LOT 115;
THENCE SOUTH 44°54'58· WEST A D
CONCENTRIC '~. A,~,,',, ,..,,,.,,- .... )I_S'['~ANCE OF 16.53 FEETTO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE
_ _ TO ,-,,,~., u~,o, ~u~ I t~'.oo PEET NORTHEASTE
ROAD, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1 RLY FROM SAID CENTERUNE OF YNEZ
267.00 FEET;
;
THENCE NORT~WEb'"TERLY, ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CONCENTRIC CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15'06'34' A DISTANCE OF 334.12 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY
MNE OF LOT 'B' OF SAID PARCEL MAP 28.~30-1;
THENCE NORTH 61o47'06- EAST A DISTANCE OF 14.00 FEE'["TO. THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,645 SQUAReFEET. MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT 'B". ATTACHED.'
H.'I~La(W'rHO- 1 ~_ i~B.1NPD
~ 16,19o8
Page 1
~ / PORTION OF LOT 115
~ ~ ~AP OF TEMECULA LAND
>~ ~ AND WATER COMPANY
~- TE~ECULA LAND-
~ AND WATE~ COMPANY
16.53'
LEOEND
~///~ E A S E ME N T ~ ~~~,
T. R. SEC. ROAD NAME:
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
EASEMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that th
i, real property
dated
from I.GA-7. Inc.. an
Corporation.
TEMECULA for the
purpose of vesting , of
Temecula on belair fl*~e public, hy the
umlersi t' of lite City
Council authority
~ Ordinance No, MO.
~ recordation thereof
ized officer
hy its duly
Dated: City of Temecula
By:
Kicak, RCE 21775, Exp. 9/30101
, of Tcmecula
PROJECT NAME:
Tills INSTRtJMENT IS FOR
TIlE BENEFIT OFf TIlE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
ENTITLED TO BE
RECORDED WITHOUT FEE
(GOV. CODE 6103)
RETURN TO THE OFFICE
OF THE CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92590
w.o.# / /
FOR RECORDER'S USE
ENG\FORM..4
CORPORATION EASEMENT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receip! of which is bercby acknowledged,
LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation,
I~creby GRANT(S) to the City of Temecnla fin casement tbr storm drain purposes over
tie real propcr~y in lite City of' Tcmecula, CoLrely of Riverside, State of Cali/bmia, ticscribed as:
Shown on Exhildt A nml Exhibit B nilached
hereto nnd, hy Ilsis reference, made n Imrt hereof.
Dated :~"-~ ],,~ I ~ / / '::/9~'"
STATE OFt C'A' -fi'~Ot{L~ t~k~/'~ ~')° t~ }SS.
cou~ oF
On ~7 /~ /~ '
~fom ~, lbe u~em~p~, n Nofn~ ~blic in ;.M tbr snid
Slate, ~m~11y
~mn~lly
sntisfncfo~ ~Me~e) m ~ rite pemon(s) who exeeut~ Ihe
wifidn instrument
~n ~l~lf'
I1~ CI)~o/~lioll litertill limited, I1~1~1 Ii~no~lcd~d Io mc lhal
W~NESS my hand and official seal.
.....
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property or Rights of Access and
Temporary Construction Agreement as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATrEST:
By:
Ron Rdgrts, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter ~ Thorson, City Attomcy
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400
Temecula, CA 92591
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
Regional Mall - Power Center
Storm Drain Easement
Revised May 12, 1998
February 24, 1998
401299-M2
Page 1 of 3
Those certain parcels of !and situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California, being those portions of Lots 140 and 141 of the Temecula Land and Water
Company per map filed in Book 8, Page 359 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, California (being portions of Parcels "B" and "C" of Lot line Adjustment
No. PA 95-0111 recorded December 15, 1995 as Instrument No. 416771 of Official Records in
the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County) included within strips of !and of
varying widths, the centerlines of which are described as follows:
Strip No. 1 COMMENCING at the centerline intersection of Winchester Road with
Margarita Road as shown on Parcel Map No. 28530-1 filed in Book ~. , Pages '~
through %tn of Parcel Maps in said Office of the Riverside County RecordeG
thence along said centerline of Margarita Road South 43054'46" East 84.68 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve therein concave southwesterly and having a radius of 2000.00
feet;
thence continuing along said centerline, along said curve southeasterly 118.75 feet through
a central angle of 03°24'07";
thence radially from said curve South 49°29'21" West 55,00 feet to the southwesterly right-of-
way line of Margarita Road (110.00 feet wide) and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, said
point being hereinafter referred to as Point "A";
thence South 45°38'22" West 30.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "B";
thence North 74°21'38" West 78.41 feet;
thence South 54026'42" West 169.73 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
southeasterly and having a radius of 500.00 feet;
H:\GRP60~PDATA~401299~O FFI CL~WPWI2~99 LGL002.WPD
Legal Description
Regional Mall - Power Center
Storm Drain Easement
Revised May 12, 1998
February 24, 1998
JN 401299-M2
Page 2 of 3
thence along said curve southwesterly 273.98 feet through a central angle of 31o23'43" to a
point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 500.00
feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 66°57'01" West;
thence along said curve southwesterly 46.56 feet through a central angle of 05°20'08" to a point
hereinafter referred to as Point "C";
thence continuing along said curve southwesterly 77.26 feet through a central angle of
08°51'12" to a point hereinafter referred to as point "D";
thence continuing along said curve southwesterly 174.47 feet through a central angle of
19°59'33";
thence tangent from said curve South 57° 13'52" West 115.73 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve southeasterly and having a radius of 500.00 feet;
thence along said curve southwesterly 226.88 feet through a central angle of 25°59'53" to a
point on Course No. 3 (being North 07°32'59" West 159.57 feet) in the easterly line of Parcel 5
as shown on sheet 7 of 9 sheets of said Parcel Map No. 25830-1 distant thereon
South 07°32'59" East 3.74 feet from the northerly terminus thereof, said point being
hereinafter referred to as Point "E".
Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate northeasterly in said
southwesterly right-of-way line of Margarita Road and southwesterly in said easterly line of
Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 25830-1.
Said strip of land shall be 30.00 feet wide (11.00 feet southeasterly and 19.00 feet
northwesterly from centerline) between said Points "A" and "B"; 22.00 feet wide between said
Points "B" and "C"; and 24.00 feet wide between said Points "C" and "E".
CONTAINING: 0.63 Acres, more or less.
Strip No. 2 BEGINNING at Point "D" as hereinbefore described in Strip No. 1;
thence South 77°46'08" East 53.30 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly
and having a radius of 90.00 feet;
thence along said curve easterly 70.69 feet through a central angle of 45°00'00";
H:\GRP60~PDATA\~01299~O FFI C~WPWll~99LGL002.WPD
Legal Description
Regional Mall - Power Center
Storm Drain Easement
Revised May 12, 1998
February 24, 1998
JN 401299-M2
Page 3 of 3
thence ~ngent from said curve South 32046'08" East 327.01 feet to a point hereinafter referred
to as Point "F".
Said strip of land shall be 22.00 feet wide between said Points "D" and "F".
EXCEPTING therefrom, that portion lying within said Strip No. 1.
CONTAINING: 0.22 Acres, more or less.
Strip No. 3 BEGINNING at a point on Course No. 12 (being North 41°46'24" West
691.91 feet) in the northeasterly line of Parcel 1 as shown on sheet 3 of 9 sheets of said Parcel
Map No. 28530-1 distant thereon North 41°46'24" West 30.53 feet from the southeasterly
terminus thereof, said point being hereinafter referred to as Point "H";
thence North 18°13'46" East 23.09 feet;
thence North 41°46'24" West 320.26 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "G".
Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate southerly in said
northeasterly line of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 28530-1.
Said strip of land shall be 20.00 feet wide between said Points "G" and "H".
CONTAINING: 0.16 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
Lawrence L. Bacon, PLS 3527
H:\GRP60~PDATA\40129CAOFFICE~WPWIN~99LGL002.WI~D
200 0 200 400 600
6RAPHI C SCALE
P.M. NO. 26852
P.M.B. 173 / 68-73
R.S. 89 / 83-86
'-W'INCH-'~ST£R P'O'C' NN~.
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ S43'54'46"E
, / / / STRIP 1~ ~ I~ '~ / ~ ~~05'24'O7"
R= 2000.00'
~~ % ~ IXlPt?X~'..~ .o,.. ,,.,,/Ol~
~ %~% kSE~ETA[L 1 ~ f~ / POINT "C" .... / ~1
~ POINT "A"
'~~~ ...,.,~ ~/~'~ .....~%.;f' , =l
., ~%~ ~22 J S'TR'IP' 1' ~
FCL. ~ ~[% MB 8/359 S.D. CO. /~/ /
t ~ PCL B PCL C
"' 0, E L~. NO. PA 95-O]11
E_ ~ INST. NO 416771, O.R.
....................................
P.O.B. POINT " t 20.00' ~ BRNO/DELTA RADIUS LENGTH
....................................
STRIP 5 ~ 1 25'59'53" 500.00' 226.88
30.5 '
2 S57' ~3'52"W -- 115.75
3 54' 10' 55" 500. O0' 298.29
FCL. 1 ¢ J l 4 31 "23'43" 500.00' 273.98
5 S54'26'42"W -- 169.73
~~ 6 N74'21' 38"W -- 78.41
q~ 7 S45'38' 22"W -- 30.00
~' 8 S49'29'21"W (RAD) 55.00
~ ~¢~6~]"~ ,~.. 08'5~'~2" 5o0.0o' 77.26
o~ 14 S32'46'08"E -- ~27.01'
DETA ]~ ~ ~ ~: ~ 15 N18' 13'46"E -- 25.09'
EXHiBiT "B" SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ~
REGIONAL MALL
POWER CENTER
REV I SED 5-12-98 [ SCALE I FIELD BOOK
FEBRUARY 24, 1998 1"=200'
PRO£ESSI~AL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
,JOB NO.
401299-M2
T. R. SEC. ROAD NAME:
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE '~-~
EASEMENT
(Government C(v3e Section 272?
THIS IS TO CERTIFY tlmt lh~lhter~st
in real p~c~ g~ant~ by fh~asemcnt
dat~
from LGA-7. Inc.. an 111i~
Co~o~lion. to ti~c C~F
TEMECULA, is hereb~ccepted for
~ of v~ting tit~ the ~y of
Temecula on ~1~ the ~bl~ ,~y the
m~e~i~ on ~lf of I1~ Ci~
Cou~il ~a~ ~uthofi~
contai~ in C~n~ O~im~e No. ~9'
G~ntee ~ to ~0~afion the~of
by ils dul~fi~ ~c~
DaiS/ ~ ~ T~cula
By:
}Y~ K k~~E 21775, Exp. 9/30/01
~gi~ ~ ~e~mla
PROJECT NAME:
Tills INSTRUMENT IS FOR
THE BENEFIT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
ENTITLED TO BE
RECORDED WITHOUT FEE
(GOV. CODE 6103)
RETURN TO THE OFFICE
OF THE CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92590
W.O.#
FOR RECORDER'S USE
CORPORATION EASEMENT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
ENG\FORM-4
LGA-7, inc., an Illinds Corporation,
hereby GRANT(S) to tile City of Temecula an easement tbr storm drain purposes over
tl~: real properly in tl~e City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Calitbmia, described as:
Shown on Exhibit A and Exhibit B atOnebed
hereto and, by Ibis reference, made a part hereof.
Dated ~'~ I t/ I
STATE OF e'AI,,,IPORlqlA ~'t.~.ltOOl~ }SS.
COUNTY ov ~o~ }
On ~o~
~fo~ ~, tl~ u~e~i~, a Nota~ ~blic in a~ tbr ~id
State, ~lly
~o~lly ~n m me (or proved ~o me on the basis of
satisfa~o~ evide~e) to ~ the ~on(s) who execul~ lhe
wiflfin instruant as
President ~ V
~ on ~lf of
tim ~fion tbe~in ~m~, as~ ac~owl~ged m ~ tlmt
~cb co~o~tion exe~t~ ll~ within instmmem pur~ant to its
by-laws or a ~nolufion of its board of director.
W~ESS my Im~ a~ o~cial s~l.
LGA-7, Inc.. Illinois corporation
~~4 t/,~L~ t~,.'l-~ President
~ ~,.( A ,~1~. ~, ~,~
** a~;~UELINE LAKnwe~-,
. NOTARY PUBLIC STAT~ ,~':'.'.~"'
· . . , ~ ~r tLLINOIS
+ My Commtsmon Expires Jan. 4, 2001
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the gram of real property or Rights of Access and
Temporary Construction Agreement as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATrEST:
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter lVL Thorson, City Attome)'
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400
Temecula, CA 92591
Revised May 12, 1998
December 29, 1997
401135-M5
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
Promenade in Temecula
Offsite Storm Drain Easement
Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California, being those portions of Lot 115 per map of the Temecula Land and Water
Company filed in Book 8, Page 359 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, California, together with that portion of Lot 6 of Tract No. 3334 per map filed in
Book 54, Pages 25 through 30 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside
County, included within Parcels "A" and "F" of Lot Line Adjustment No. 95-0111 recorded
December 15, 1995 as Instrument No. 416771 of Official Records in the said Office of the
Riverside County Recorder, described as follows:
PARCEL 1
BEGINNING at a point on Course No. 28 (North 60007'46" East 114.49 feet) in the boundary
line of Parcel Map No. 28530-1 as shown on sheet 3 of 9 sheets of said Parcel Map No. 28530-1
filed in Book ~ ~'L , Pages '~% through ~-~t~ of Parcel Maps in said Office of the
Riverside County Recorder distant thereon South 60007'46" West 19.02 feet from the
northeasterly terminus thereof;
thence along said course and boundary line South 60°07'46" West 95.47 feet to the
southwesterly terminus of said Course No. 28 and the beginning of a tangent curve in said
boundary line concave southeasterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet;
thence along said curve and boundary line southwesterly 5.58 feet through a central angle of
09007'35" to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of
1297.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 61°47'01" West;
thence along said curve southeasterly 257.58 feet through a central angle of 11022'44" to a
point of compound curvature with a curve concave westerly and having a radius of 31.00 feet,
a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 73 °09'45" West;
thence along said curve southerly 33.73 feet through a central angle of 62°20'38";
H:\GRP 60WDATA\401135~OFFI CE,WPWI31~SLGL005.W'PD
Promenade in Temecula
Offsite Storm Drain Easement
Revised May 12, 1998
December 29, 1997
401135-M5
Page 2 of 3
thence tangent from said curve South 45°30'23" West 15.65 feet to the non-tangent intersection
with a curve in the northeasterly right-of-way line of Ynez Road as described in a deed
recorded August 28, 1991 as Instrument No. 297822 of Official Records in said Office
of the Riverside County Recorder, said curve being concave southwesterly and having a radius
of 1267.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point beam South 74°43'59" West;
thence along said curve and right-of-way line southeasterly 42.72 feet through a central angle
of 01 o 55'55";
thence non-tangent from said curve North 45°30'23" East 40.35 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 59.00 feet;
thence along said curve northeasterly 7.21 feet through a central angle of 07°00'22";
thence non-tangent from said curve South 89°29'37" East 48.31 feet;
thence North 00°30'23" East 24.00 feet;
thence North 89029'37" West 37.11 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave westerly
and having a radius of 59.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point beam
North 77°26'30" West;
thence along said curve northerly 29.97 feet through a central angle of 29°06'26" to a point
of compound curvature with a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 1332.00
feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 73°27'04" West;
thence along said curve northwesterly 202.79 feet through a central angle of 08°43'23" to a
point of reverse curvature with a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 76.00 feet, a
radial line of said curve from said point bears North 64°43'41" East;
thence along said curve northerly 103.10 feet through a central angle of 77°43'41" to a point
of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1024.00 feet,
a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 37032'38" West;
thence along said curve northeasterly 4.20 feet through a central angle of 00 ° 14'06" to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.33 Acres, more or less.
H:\GRP60~PDATA\401135~OFFI CI~,WPWIIV~351_.GL005.WPD
Promenade in Temecula
Offsite Storm Drain Easement
Revised May 12, 1998
December 29, 1997
401135-M5
Page 3 of 3
PARCEL 2
BEGINNING at the southwesterly terminus of Course No. 26 (being North 28° 13'36" East
22.65 feet) in the boundary line of Parcel Map No. 28530-1 as shown on sheet 3 of 9 sheets of
said Parcel Map No. 28530-1 filed in Book \el~. , Pages :~ through ue ~ of
Parcel Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorde~,
thence along said course and boundary line North 28°13'36" East 22.65 feet to the
northeasterly terminus thereof and the beginning of a tangent curve in said boundary line
concave southerly and having a radius of 35.00 feet;
thence along said curve and boundary line easterly 51.09 feet through a central angle of
83°37'53" to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of
76.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 14°54'58" East;
thence along said curve southwesterly 44.97 feet through a central angle of 33 °54'08" to a point
of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1024.00 feet,
a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 48°49'06" West;
+
thence along said curve southwesterly 39.89 feet through a central angle of 02°13'55" to a
point on a non-tangent curve in said boundary line concave northwesterly and having a radius
of 287.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 57°50'39" West;
thence along said curve and boundary line northeasterly 19.68 feet through a central angle of
03°55'45" to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.01 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
H:\GP..P60~PDATA\401135~OF'FI C E~WPWII~35LGL005.V~PD
100 0 100 200 ~00
GRAPHIC SCALE
PARCEL MAP NO. 28550-1
~' ,' 27 I \
~o' ~ .' ~,~7-s '-- P.O.B. .,/
~ ~ -- / ~ , ~t~) ~'
' I ~C'T ~:; / : ~T ~':
' ' ..... / ........
/ ~l ................ ~ ...........
~1~ LLA NO. 95-0111
~$ INST. NO~ 418771,
'o4" (REC'D. 112-15-95.)
DATA TABLE
PCL. F
BRNG/DEL TA RAD I US LENGTH
LOT
TRACT :,:;~
M.3
1 S60"07'46"W -- 19.02'
2 S60°07'46"W -- 95.47'
5 09"07'35" 35.00' 5.58'
4 11'22'44" 1297.00' 257.58'
5 62°20'38" 31,00' 35.75
6 S45°30'23"W -- 15.65
7 01"55'55" 1267.00' 42.72
8 N45"30'23"E -- 40.35
9 07"00'22" 59.00' 7.21
10 08°43'23" 1332.00' 202.79
11 77"43'41" 76.00' 103.10
12 00"14'06" 1024.00' 4.20
15 S89°29'37"E -- 48.31
14 NOO"30'23"E -- 24.00'
15 NBg"2g'37"W -- 37.11'
16 29°06'26" 59.00' 29.97'
17 05"55'45" 287.00' 19.68'
18 N28°lD'36"E -- 22.65'
19 83~37'53" 35.00' 51.09'
20 33°54'08" 76.00' 44.97'
21 02~13'55" 1024.00' 39.89'
EXHIBIT 'B'
TEMECULA TOWN CENTER
REGIONAL MALL SITE
OFFSITE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
REVISED 5-18-98 I SCALE
DECEMBER 89, 1997 1'=100'
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET
Robe~ Be~,~l~c~r~ F~os~ & Assoc~c~es
pRrlFESSIrlNAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS mi. SURVEYORS
I FIELD BODK I JOB NO,
401135-M5
[:XI~IFT RECORDING At:QUESTED BY
City of Tomesvia
PER OOV'T CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
C'ay ofTenmeula - Cily Clerk
P O Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr.
Temeculn, CA 92519-9033
MAIL TAX STA'I~/v!~q'I~ TO
City o f Tom~11]l
P O ~ox 9033, 43200 I~sineas Padt Dr.
Ten~cula, CA 92589-~33
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
(Corporation)
The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of ~he herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and i~s successors
or assigns, for sUeel and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State
of California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is ubdetstood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of tim City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto.
IN W]~]EL~S T]']]~F, the~e pteaea~ have executed this inatnm!e~_ t
COUN~ or ~smnj~o/~
~ ~ lq/ /~ ,~fo~me'~eu~e~ig,~,
~ly ~ m ~ (~ ~v~ to ~ on t~ ~is of satisfacto~ ev~e)
h ~/~k ~ ~(~), ~ ~ by ~,~/l~ir ~i~)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~a), ~ ~ mity u~n ~fof ~ch ~ ~,on(a) ~,
ex~ ~ ~.
WITHBSS my hand and official seal.
By:
Prim Name and Title
corporatit
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF ILLIfilOIS
My Commission Expires Jan. 4, 2001
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temeculn hereb} accepts the grant of real property as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Su$-n W. Jones, CMC
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGA~ DESCRIPTION FOR
ROAD RIGHT OF WAY
PAGE 1 OF ~
BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 6 AND 7 OF TRACT NO. 3334 IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FILED IN
BOOK 54 AT PAGES 25 THROUGH 30, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND ALSO BEING PORTIONS OF
Pi~CEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31 RECORDED JULY 20, 1993
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 278787 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, MORE PA.~TICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL ~A" ROAD
BEING A 50.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMI~ENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PA/{CEL "A" OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD, 88 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PA~RCEL "A" OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTSlENT NO. 31 NORTH 79°47'19" EAST, 46.00 FEET (NORTH
79°46'43# FAST, 46.00 FEET RECORD PER L.L.A. NO. 31) TO A POINT
HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A", SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE
BEGINNING OF A TA/gGENT 1000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHERLY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING A.LONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL "A" OF LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31 THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES:
EASTERLY ALONG SAID 1000.00 FOOT PJ%DIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 15°00'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 261.80 FEET (MF-ASURED AND
RECORD), A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 04"47'19" F2%ST;
THENCE SOUTH 85°12'41" EAST, 683.49 FEET (SOUTH 85°13;17" F,~T,
683.49 FEET RECORD PER L.L.A. NO. 31) TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT 1000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
06°44'57" AN A~C DISTANCE OF 117.80 FEET (RECORD AND MEASURED);
THENCE NORTH 88°02'22" EAST (NORTH 88°01'46" EAST RECORD PER
L.L.A. NO. 31), 468.68 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE BEARING NORTH
01°26'07" WEST, SAID POINT TO BE REFERRED TO HEREINAFTER AS POINT
~B", SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TERMINUS OF SAID 50.00 FOOT WIDE
STRIP OF LAND.
EXHIBIT ~A"
SHEET 2 OF ~
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LA/gD SHALL BE PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY AT SAID LINE HAVING A
BFJkRING OF NORTH 01°26'07" WEST.
CONTAINING 76,779.61 SQUARE FEET OR 1.763 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "B" ROAD
BEGINNING AT POINT ~A" ]iS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ~A" DESCRIPTION
HEREIN;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. 31 SOUTH 79°47'19" WEST, 23.00 FEET TO THE
EItSTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD, 134 FEET WIDE, AS
DESCRIBED IN INSTRUi~NT NO. 50710 RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1993 IN
SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE;
THENCE A/~ONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD NORTH 10°12'41"
WEST, 75.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 52"49'32" FAST, 33.97
FEET TO A LINE PAPJkLLEL WITH AND 23.00 FEET EASTERLY OF SAID
EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID PA/~ALLEL LINE SOUTH 10"12'41" EI~T, 50.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1,437.50 SQUIU{E FEET OR 0.033 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL ~C" R~
BEGINNING AT POINT "B# AS DESCRIBED IN P~/~EL ~A" DESCRIPTION
HEREIN;
THENCE A~LONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ~A# OF LOT LINE
;%DJUSTMENT NO. 31 NORTH 88"02'22" FJ%ST, 22.52 FEET TO THE
WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MARGARITA ROAD, 110 FEET WIDE, AS
DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT NO. 305606 RECORDED AUGUST 18, 1992 IN
SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE;
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 01~58'33"
WEST, 9.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 2055.00 FOOT PJ~DIUS
CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY;
C:~D~SMNTI.DO~
EM/~IBI T '~A"
SH~.ET 3 OF ~
THENCE NORTHERLY A.LONG SAID CUR%q~ A/gD SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01"47'35" ~ ~C DIST~CE OF
64.31 ~ET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 41~32'36" WEST, 33.48
~ET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 '2 6' 07" ~T, 50.00 ~ET TO THE POINT OF
BEGI~ING.
CONTAINING 1,391.42 SQU~E ~ET OR 0.032 AC~S MO~ OR LESS.
SEE E~IBIT "B" ATTACHED HE~TO
C:~m/)~k!NT I.DO(:
EXHIBIT "B"
SCALE: 1"= 200'
EXP. 12/3!/00
.~Ho. 5928
APN g2:l-ogo-o~B
LOT ~ 7
/.//
L.L.A. NO. 3! \ <R = 1000.00'>
REC'D 7/20/93 '~ PARCEL "A" ~
/ ~ ooo. oo")
TRACT ~ NO, ' 3234
MB 54 / ~ 25 - ~0
SHEET 2 I
APN ~21-0~0-055 ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~ APR
,~ DENOTES RECORD DATA ~,~& L ~ / 921-090-055
PER RS g~/~. ~.~ ~ ~' ~ [
o · .~ ....
~ ~.~ ~ ~ PARCEL A O~ L L A
P~ ~ 5~/25-~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~ No ~z8z.~' '
INS~ NO. 278787 ~ ~-- -- ~ -- N : '. ~
REC'D 7/20/93. I~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REC'D 7/20/93
~ (N I0~317 W 296~23~ ,~ L.~A. NO. 31
~ <N 10~2'53" W 29623'> . -~ ~ - 50' 'INS~ NO. 278787
~ ' L DT , I ~ R[C~ 7/20/93
~ ~ = ~ooo. oo'> / / ~.,
~ (L = 261 80') ~ /~P.O.B. PCL. A"&"B"
-- P~L ~: _ ~~ ~ _, ~.~'07 ~ ~ ~r. NO.
.SHEET 2 ~ ~ / ~, ' 446.~6.43' E) { ~ ""
~, ~,~ , ~ . -~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - _ · , ........
<N I0~'2'53" W> (N 10'13'17" W)
Trans-Pacific Consultants CIVIL ENGINEERS
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA., 92,590 LAND SURVEYORS.
THIS PLAT IS SOl. ELY AN AID IN LOCATING mE PARCEL(S:) DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IT IS NOT PART OF'THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTIONTHEREIN. 2
sc,,£: ,'. 20o' ! D.,,,~ .,,, 'm'a^TE9/29/,71 EXHIBIT
SHEET 1 OF'
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PLANNERS
w.o. #
RDESMNT1 .DWG
EXHIBIT "B"
sc~: ~"-- ~oo' DETAIL "B"
_ / ~ ~,t ,o.o~ --'~;~,_~,'..',:: · :.,_~.~o~
(,~o' ~O~) ~ ~'ee~
REC'D 8/18/92
MARGARITA RD.
(ca' ~og) PER
.
~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ P.O.B. P~ 'C'
- 64.3~' PAI~CEL "A' 50'
~ o~a'~' w s~ SHggr ~ ~ ~0',
9.9~' ,
~ O~RLAND DRI~ ~ S'L Y LINE
~ PAR~L 'A' OF LOT LINE
INST. NO. 27B787
~EC'e ~/20/95
~ ~~ ~. DE TAIL "A"
No. 5928 /
(R - I~.~')_ ~ [ . . OF PARCEL 'A' OF LOT LINE
(L = 26h80')
~50' I 50' ~P 'B" INET. NO. 278787
N t0~2'4~' W ~ ~/ ...... CL. REC'D 7/20/93
~o. oo.~ ~ / ~ ~.~.o~: ~
N 52"49'32' W ~ ~ / _ (N 79'~'43 E)
~97'~ _
~.o~'~ ~, * YNEZ ROAD
~ "' '~'~ ~ ~ ,o~;.,,.w
-- PARCEL
Trans-Pacific ConsulLants
27447 Enterprise Circle West. Temecula. CA.. 92590
THIS PLAT IS ~:O~.LY AN AID IN LOCATING THE PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED DOCUMENT, IT IS NOT PART OF' THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION THEREIN.
SCALE: 1"- 100' DRAWN BY TB-
CIVIL ENGINEERS
LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS
w.o. #
s~££~ 2 o~ 2
OATE9/30/97IRIGHT-OF-WAY EXHIBIT
RDESMNT2.DWG
EXEMPT RECORDINO REQUESTED BY
City of Tem~uln
PER ~V~
AND ~EN R~ MA~ TO
City ofT~ub - C~y
TeacuP, CA
City o~T~
Te~u~, CA ~89~3
EASEMENT DEED - SLOPE PURPOSES
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
LGA-7, inc., an Ill±nois corporat:J. on
GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision. an easement for slope purposes, including
the cons~uction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California,
'See Attached Exhibit "A" For Complete Description
This easement shall terminate as to those portions of the subject property which are developed by Grantor to the
extent the slope easement is no longer needed. The City shall record such additional documents as may be
reasonably required to confirm the termination or partial termination of this easement.
LGA- 7,
IN WITNF_3S THEREOF, thee preaenU here ~x~cuted this instmn!~
this I-~4'"" dayof :To I,./ ,19q7
es.
COUNTY OF RIVi~RnlDI;~C~/~
On ..~-~.--'~ /~ ~ ,heforenmthe,,ndersigned,
a Notary PuPil,' in ~nd for the $tat~ of'C-affront.' Eersormlly appeared
l~rsonally Iraown to nm (or proved to nm on the basis of satisfactory ~vid~nce)
to he the puson(s) vdso~ nan.(s) is/nr~ subscrihed to the within
in hb/!mr/th~ amhoris~ eape~(i~), and that by his/her/their signamp(s)
on tb insthmsmt n,. peon(s), or ties mt~ upon b~df of which tbe pmon(e) ae~d,
WrI'NESS my hand nnd official semi.
Inc. , an~ll_i.nois4corporation
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
JACQUELINE LAKOWSKI
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS
My Commission Expires Jan. 4, 2001
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby aceepls the Brant of s~l property u sd forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. John, CMC
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
EXHIBIT ~A#
PARCEL ~D# SLOPE EASEMENT
BEING .A 25.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
WHICH IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL ."A" AS DESCRIBED HEREIN;
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP OF L~D SHALL BE PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED WESTERLY SO AS TO TERMINATE ON SAID EASTERLY 67.00 FOOT
HALF WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD AND PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED F, ASTER. LY SO AS TO TERMINATE ON SAID WESTERLY 55.00 FOOT
HALF WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MARGARITA ROAD;
CONTAINING 39,114.39 SQUARE FEET OR 0.898 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
·
' AP/¥ 921.090-053
~ , ~1_~ ~ ~.~c'o ,/~o/,~
'. / h LOT
~ ~/' N ~ YNEZ ROAD~%~
' ~~m~ ...... ~-~-~ ~ .....: ,.
Trans-Pacific Consultants 'C~WL ENGINEERS
__27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA., 92,590 LAND SURVEYORS. PLANNERS
Tiffs PLAT I$ SOLELY AN AID IN LOCATING THE PARC£L($) 0£SCRIB£D IN TH£ W.O. /~
._.ATTACH[D DOCUMENT. IT IS NOT PART OIr THE M~ITI'EN DESCRIPTION THEREIN. SHEET 1 OIr I 12-01,3.07
SCxL~: ,'. 200' I 0. AW. 8, TE~ o,~z 215198 EXHIBIT
i~EMPT REC'ORDINO REQUESTED BY
City
~ ~V~ ~D~ ~1~
~D ~N R~ M~
City of T~uln -
P O ~x ~3. 432~ ~ h~ Dr.
T~u~. CA ~3
M~ T~ ~A~
C~y oFT~
PO ~x ~3,432~ ~ h~ Dr.
T~, CA ~[~3
RIGHT OF ENTRY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
Herein referred to as "City", and
LGA=7, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Herein referred to as 'Grantor".
The fight is hereby granted City to enter upon and use the !and of Grantor in the City of Temecula, State of
California, described as:
See Attached Exhibit "A" For Complete Description
for ail porposed necessary to facilitate and accomplish the construclion of z .~t-r~- nnc~ h~gh=~y
A fourteen (14) day written nodce shall be given to Grantor prior to using the rights herein granted. The rights
herein granted may be exerclaed for 18 months after the fourteen (14) day written notice, or undl completion of
said project, whichever shall be sooner.
It is understood that the Cily may enter upon Grantor's property where appropriate or designated tbr the purpose
of getting equipment to and from the easement area. City agrees no! to damage Grantor's property in the process
of performing such activities.
The right to enter upon and use Grantor's land includes the right to remove and dispose of real and personal
property located thereon. Grantor reserves the right to remove salvable real and personal property on or before
the expiralion of the fourteen (14) day notice. !f said property is not removed in its entirety at Grantor's expense
on or before said date for any reason whatsoever, the tight to remove said property shall tetrairate and said will
become property of City to dispose of at ils discretion.
City slmll remove, replace and relocate u necessary any existing fencing disturbed by conslruc~on of highway Io
new property line on Orantor'a remaining property. Grantor agrees that City, its agents, employees or contractors
shall have the right to enter upon Grantor's land for the purpose of performing the fence replacements or
relocaliom. All replaced or relocated fencing shall be left in as good condition as it is found and shall thereafter be
the responsibility of Grantor to maintain and repair.
At the terminalion of the period of use of Grantor's and City, but before its relinquishment to Grantor, debris
generated by City's use, will be removed and the surface will be graded and left in a neat condition.
Grantor shall be held harmless from all claims of third persons arising from ~he use by City of Grantor's land.
Grantor hereby warrants that he is the owner of the property described above and that he has the right to grant City
permission to enter upon and use the land.
This agreement is the result of negodadons between the parties hereto. This agreement is intended by the parties
as a tirol expression of their understanding with respect to the ma~rs herein and is a complete and exclusive
statement of the terms and conditions thereof.
9. This agreement shall not be changed, modified, or amended except upon the written consent of the parties hereto.
10. This agreement supersedes any and all other prior agreements or understanding, oral or written, in connection
therewith.
!I.
Grantor, his assigns and successors in interest, shall be bound by all the terms and conditions contained in this
agreement, and all the pardcs thereto shall be joinfly and severally liable thereunder.
IN WITNESS.THEREOF, these presents have ~xectfied this iMt~nje~!
COUN~ O~B)~ ~
a N~ ~1~ ~ ~ for ~ S~e of ~~omlly a~
~!y ~ Io ~ (or p~v~ to nm on I~ ~is of salisfaclo~ eyre)
to ~ ~ ~s) w~e ~s) i~are subsc~ to tim wit~
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
Print Name ,red Title
Its: W~cT~ ~.. ~o~¥~
Its:/Btca,~C Iq. F~6~
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS
My Commission Expires .Jan, 4, 2001 ·
The City Co~neiJ, City of Temeeula hereby accepts the grant of red properi as se~ forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mnyor
BY:
Susan W. Jonm, CMC
Aetlng Ci~ Cbrk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. ~n, City Attorney
EXHIBIT ~A"
PA~L ~E" TEMPOI~Y CONSTR3JCTION F~EMENT
BEING A 15.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF L;tND, THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
WHICH IS THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL "D" AS DESCRIBED HEREIN~
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAIgD SHA/,L BE PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED WESTERLY SO AS TO TERMINATE ON SAID F2%STERLY 67.00 FOOT
HALF WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF YNEZ ROAD i~ND PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED EASTERLY SO AS TO TERMINATE ON SAID WESTERLY 55.00 'FOOT
HALF WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I~G~ITA RO~
CONTAINING 23,856.41 SQUARE FEET OR 0.548 ACBES, MORE OR LESS.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS A,RE SUBJECT TO COVEN~TS,-CONDITIONS,
P~SERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY ~D EASEMENTS,
IF A~NY OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
-' APN 92%090-066
/ ~ APN
~/ ~ PARCEL
L.L.A. NO. 3~ ,.
INS[ NO. 278~
R~C'D 7/20/95 '~
/ ~ / -~.~.)
96 / ~ TRACT
/' ~ I
) 25 - 30
.
APN g21-OgO-053 ,' O~LA~
~Ec'o ~/2o/~3
~ARCEL "~"
PAR~L 'E'~, ~o' ~NS~ NO.
/ REC~20/gZ
/
LOT /
~ - ~ ~'~' _~ ------.--~ ...........
Trans-Pacific Corisultants '~L ~N~S
27447 Enterprise Ckcle West. Temecula. CA,. 92590 ~O SUR~RS. PLANNERS
~S ~AT ~ ~y AN AID IN L~A~G ~ P&R~S) O~ED IN mE I ~ W.O. ~
A~A~ED D~T. It ~ ~r PART ~ mE ~1~ ~S~P~ r~E~. SHEET 1 ~ 1
12-01~.07
sc~: ,-~ 200'J o~ e~.,T~ ~ ~/~/~e I EASEMENT EXHIBIT
NOR TH_ TC.'-.DWG
EXHIBIT "B"
The undersigned, being the present rifle owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its succeasors
or assigns, for street and highway purl~es, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State
of California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit 'B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its suc~rs or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, tmfil such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisiom hereof shall inure ~o the benefit of and he binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
represenmtives of the rempective parties hereto. LGA-7, Inc., an Illin, s
IN WITNESS TH]BPJ$OF, tlmm presu~ have executed this ins
this I .~,t~ day of ~'O/_)/- ,19~t~nt
STATE OF,C~t.II~IUIlA } S$.
COUNTY OF R!~ ~.~tu=}
On "'COIy I~. Jc~c~o°' ,heforomotheundorsi~ned,
a Nota~ Public in and for the $tmo of C~lifb.fia, mrsumlly app~a~J
personnHy ]~own to m (or proved to m~ on tho b~is of satisfactory
to b~ tho person(s) who~o namo(s) is/aro subscribed to the within
inetn~n~t and noknowied$,ed to nm that i~/she/they oxeculod the same
in his/her/their aufism'ix~ oapooity(ios), and ~at by his/her/limit signnturo(s)
on tho instnm~t tb p~m(s), or ti~ entity upon hehnlf of which the person(s)
WITNF. SS my hnnd nnd officini se~d.
ACCP-PTANCE CERTI~CATE
Ill~s corporation
Pr~ Name and T~
Its :to~-te£ L c~T~ p£~s,b~ff
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
JACQUELINE LAKOWSKI
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS
My Commission Expires Jan. 4, 2001
The City Council, City of Temecula hopby accepts the grant of real propen'y as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
Ron Robere, Mayor
BY:
Su~an W. Jones, CMC
Acting c~y Cl~rk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
#
EXHIBIT "A"
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
PARCEL "A" CITY OF TEMECULA
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31
That portion Parcel "A" per the City of Temecula Lot line Adjustment number 31 Recorded on
July 20, 1993 as instrument No.278787, Records of Riverside County, California. lying within
Rancho Temecula, also being within the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
Califomia and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northeasterly comer of said Parcel "A" as shown on Record of Survey filed
as Book 96 Page 1 of Surveys, Records said County, said point being on the Westerly 44.00 foot
half-width sideline of of Margarita Road per said Map and being the beginning of a non-tangent
2044.00 foot radius curve concave Easterly, a radial bears North 78 °52'48" West;
THENCE Southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 13 °05'26" a distance
of 467.00 feet;
THENCE South 1 °58'14" East 9.27 feet to the Southerly line of said Parcel "A";
THENCE along said line South 88°02'10" West 11.0000 feet to an intersection with a line
55.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at right angles, and parallel with, the Centerline of said
Magarita Road;
THENCE along said parallel line North 1 °58'14" West 9.27 feet to the beginning of a 2055.00
foot radius curve concave Easterly;
THENCE Northerly along curve through a centrai angle of 13 °06'27" a distance of 470.12 feet
to the Northerly line of said Parcel "A".
THENCE along said line South 75°42'55" East 11.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.1207 acres, more or less.
License Expires 9-30-00
Date: '..
ZNI' 58'14'W
9.27 C4 ~
LC3-'"---'
N1'58'14'W
9.27
DETAIL 'B'
N.T.S.
N75 42'55'W
11.02
',,~N78' 52'48W RA__D
DETAIL 'A'
N.T.S.
No. DIRECTION DISTANCE
LI N 79'46'38' E 45.98
No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH
CI 6'44'57' 1000.00 117.80
C2 15'00'29' I000.00 261.94
C3 13'05'26' 2044,00 467.00
C4 13'06'27' 2055.00 470,12
PARCEL ' B' ~
PER LLA NO. 31
PARCEL 'A'
PER LLA NO, 31
RECORDED 7-20-1993
INST. NO. 278787
APN 921-090-056
SEE DETAIL
N78'51'47~ RAD
N78'52'48~ RAD
EXHIBIT 'B'
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
/usr / projOoTO/r_grp/a_ 15154/154D n~ 5.agn
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
3050 CHICAGO AVE.. SUITE 1OO. RIVERSIDE, CA 9250'
SCALE 1':200' J DATE SEPTEMBER 23. 1997
PLOT DATE.' 21-APR-1998 JN 13134
~ RECORDING REQUESTED
City o~T~n~ula
Pl~t GOV'T CODE 6103
~D ~EN ~O~ M~ TO
C~ ofT~ - City ~
P O ~x ~3, 432~ ~i~ ~ Dr.
C~y of T~
P O ~ ~3, ~ ~. ~ ~.
T~, CA
EASEMENT DEED - SLOPE PURPOSES
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, r~ceipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois corporation
GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for slope purposes, including
the cons~ucfon and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California,
described as:
See Attached Exhibit 'A" For Complete Description
This easement shall lermimte as to tho~ po~ons of the subject propemy which are developed by Grantor to the
e. xt~nt the ~1ope easement is no longer nee. Aexl. The City shall record such additional documents as may be
reasonably required to confirm the t~rminafion or partial termimtion of this easement.
LGA- 7,
]~ ~ ~H~=OF, the~e ~ h~ve execul~xi this imuume~
STA~ OF ~~ ) SS. .
co~ oF~_~} ~
~y ~ m ~ (or ~v~ to ~ ~ t~ b=~= of ~ti=fac~o~ ev~en~)
to ~ ~ ~) ~ ~) ~/~ ~b=c~ to ~ wit~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~*), or ~ ~i~ u~n ~f of ~=h ~ ~0) ~,
$ "O~lClnL SE~L"
~S =X ~ ~ o~i~ ~. ~ JACQUELIHE LA~OWS~I
, ~ NOTARY POBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS
Siam ~~ ~ MyC0mmissi0nExpiresJan. 4,2~l ~
ACCE~ANCE
Inc., an IllinOis corpora-
Print Nsmm an~ Title
Its:~AUrE~ L. ~T~
City Counc/i, City of Ternecula i~.. reby accepts the grnnt of real property ~ set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATrEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Su~n W. Jo~es, CMC
Acting City Cl~rk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
SLOPE EASEMENT
PARCEL "A" CITY OF TEMECULA
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31
That portion Parcel "A" per the City of Temecula Lot line Adjustment number 31 Recorded on
July 20, 1993 as Instrument No.278787, Records of Pdverside County, California. lying within
1Laneho Temeeula, also being within the City of Temeeula, County of Riverside, State of
California and more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the most Southeasterly comer of said Parcel "A", also being on the
Westerly 44.00 foot half-width sideline of Margarita Road;
THENCE along said south line South 88°02'10" West 11.00 feet to an intersection with a line
55.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at right angles, and parallel with, the Centerline of said
Magarita Road being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE along the Southerly line of said Parcel A, South 88°02'10" West 5.00 feet;
THENCE North 1 °58'14" West 9.27 feet;
THENCE North 5 °24'22" West 114.33 feet, to the beginning of a non-tangent 2070.00 foot
radius curve concave Easterly, a radial bears North 88°48'36" West;
THENCE along the are of said curve through a centeral angle of 0°16'44" a distance of 10.08
feet;
THENCE South 88 °31'52" East 15.00 feet, to the beginning of a non-tangent 2055.00 foot
radius curve concave Easterly, a radial bears North 88 °3 I'52" West;
THENCE Southerly along the are of said curve, through a central angle of 3 °26'22", a distance
of 123.36 feet, to the terminus of said curve;
THENCE South 1 °58'14" East 9.27 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Containing 0.03 acres, more or less.
~.,o,n.,~.~-lamngt0n, L.S. 5441
License Expires 9-30-00
Da~:
L2 NB8' 48'16~L RAD
~ TPOB -~.~ ............................
~ ~POC
-~ ,.~.s.
,o.O~,~CT~ON.O~ST~NCE
L~ N ~:0~', ~0~ ~S.00
SC~ N ~'~4'~",~4.~
~ L4 N 88'48'~6" ~ 15.00
~ Ls N ~'~',~4]] W g.27
~ L6 N 79'4G 38 E 45.98
~ L7 N 88~02' 10" E 11.00
~ L8 N 88'31'52" W RAD 15.00
~ No. DELTA HADIUS LENOTH
mmm mmmmmm--mm__mmmm m mmm maim
C1 6'44'57" 1000.00 117.80
C2 15' 00~9" 1000.00 261.94
C3 13'05~26# 2044.00 4~7.00
C4 3' 26' 22" 2055. O0 123.3G
C5 0~16'44" 2070.00 10.08
PARCEL 'B' ~ PARCEL 'A'
PER LLA NO, 31 _ PER LLA NO, 31
RECORDED 7-20-1993
INST. NO. ~7~7S7 / .~.;;':~'"~.~',~:~
0
· ~ '"~ ~ ~ ~~', ,' . ·
SEE DETAIL A ,; .-. ,....
g ~--~ ~
- ~ .... ~ M .,
---.------~' ~_ ~ ~ / .....
' ...........................~ ......... / N78' 52'48~ RAD
..................... ~--~ C3 ..................
~ ~MARGARITA ROA~"
EXHIBIT 'B'
SLOPE EASEMENT
/usr/projaata/r_grp/cL 13154/154Drf9.dgn
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
3050 CHICAGO AVE.. SUITE 1OO. RIVERSIDE. CA 9250'
SCALE 1°=200' ) DATE JANUARY 7, 1998
PLOT DATE: 21-APR-1998 JN 13134
EXEMFT RF:CORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Tem~:uln
PER GOV'T CODE 61~
~D ~EN ~O~ M~ TO
City o~Te~ula - City Cle~
P O ~x ~33. 432~ ~si~ ~rk Dr.
T~u~, CA 9~89-~3
City o~ T~
P O ~x ~3, 43~ ~ ~ ~.
RIGHT OF ENTRY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
CITY OF TEM~CULA
Herein referred to as "City", and
LGA=7, Inc., an Illinois
Herein referred to as "Grantor~.
corparation
The right is hereby granted City to enter upon and use the land of Grantor in the City of Temecula, State of
California, described as:
See Attached Exhibit 'A" For Complete Description
for all putposed necessary to facilitate and accomplish the cons~c6onof a street and highway
A fourteen (14) day wriuen notice shall be given to Grantor prior to using the rights herein granted. The rights
herein granted may be exercised for li months after the fourteen (14) day wriHen notice, or until completion of
said project, whichever shall be sooner.
It is understood that the City may enter upon Grantor's property where appropriate or designated for the pro'pose
of getting equipment to and from the easement area. City agrees not to damage Grantor's property in the process
of performing such acfvities.
The right to enter upon and use Grantor's land includes the right to remove and dispose of real and personal
property located thereon. Grantor reserves the right to remove salvable real and personal properly on or before
the expiration of the fourteen (14) day notice. If said property is not removed in its entirety at Grantor's expense
on or before said date for any reason whatsoever, the right to remove said property shall terminate and said will
become property of City to dispose of at its discretion.
City ~tall remove, replace and relocate as necessary any existing fencing dismrhed by construction of highway to
new property Une on Grantor's remaining property. Grantor agrees ~hat City, its agents, employees or contractors
shall have the right to enter upon Grantor's land for the purpose of performing the fence replacements or
relocations. All replaced or relocated fencing shall be left in as good condition as it is found and shall thereafter be
the responsibility of Grantor to maintain and repair.
At the terminalion of the period of use of Grantor's and City, but before its relinquishment to Grantor, debris
generated by City's use, will be removed and the surface will be graded and left in a neat condition.
Grantor shall be held harmless from all claims of third persons arising from the use by City of Grantor's land.
Grantor hereby warrants that he is the owner of the property described above and that he has the right to grant City
permission to enter upon and use the land,
This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parlies hereto. This agreement is intended by the parties
as a final expression of their understanding with res~ct to the mauers herein and is a complete and exclusive
statement of the terms and conditions thereof.
This agreement shall not be changed, modified, or amended except upon the written consent of the parties hereto.
This agreement supersedes any and all other prior agreements or understanding, oral or written, in connection
therewith.
11.
Grantor, his assigns and successors in interest, shall be bound by all the terms and conditions contained in fitis
agreement, and all the pardes thereto shall be jointly and severally liable thereunder.
IN W1TN~S THEREOF, rinse prosoats have exeeut~J this i~trum_ent
t~s /~',"~ ~y of ~v 1V , ~9 ~
COU~ OF
a No~ ~b~c m ~ for ~e S~te of~i~..~a, ~o~11y ap~
~o~y ~o~ to me (or ~v~ to me on ~ ~is of ~isf~toV
to ~ ~ ~mn(s) whose ~s) is/~e ~bscfi~ to ~e ~
~t~t ~ g~wl~g~ m me ~ ~sh~ey ex~ut~ ~ ~
m ~r/~ ~~ ~yi~(i~), ~ ~ by ~s~r/~
ex~u~ ~ ~t~.
WITNESS my tuuxl ~ official seal.
Signature ~
inc.,~nti.~s corporatim
B-~~~~le
Print
Its:~JAL-[6~ (... i.O~Z-'TE O£u%~Oe~
· "OFFICIAL SEAL"
· JACQUELINE LAKOWSKI
· NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF
· My Commission Expires Jan, 4, 2001
ACCF. PTANC~ CI~.RTIFICATI:.
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby nccepts the grant of real property ~ set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PARCEL "A" CITY OF TEMECULA
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 31
That portion Parcel "A" per the City of Temecula Lot line Adjustment number 31 Recorded on
July 20, 1993 as Instrument No.278787, Records of Riverside County, California. lying within
Rancho Temecula, also being within the City of Temecula. County of Riverside, State of
California and more particularly described as follows:
A Temporary Construction Easement being a strip of land 40 feet in width, as measured at right
angles to and being parallel with the Westerly 55.00 foot half width sideline of Margarita Road.
Excepting therefrom all that portion of land lying Easterly and Southerly of the following
described line;
COMMENCING at the most Southeasterly comer of said Parcel "A", also being on the
Westerly 44.00 foot half-width sideline of Margarita Road;
THENCE along the south line of said Parcel "A" South 88°02'10" West 11.00 feet to an
intersection with a line 55.00 feet Westerly of. as measured at right angles, and parallel with, the
Centerline of said Magarita Road being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE North 88 °02'10" East 5.00 feet;
THENCE North 1 °58'14" West 9.27 feet;
THENCE North 5 °24'22" West 114.33 feet, to the beginning of a non-tangent 2070.00 foot
radius curve concave Easterly, a radial bears North 88 °48'36" West; _
THENCE along the are of said curve through a central angle of 0 °16'44" a distance of 10.08 feet:
THENCE South 88 °31'52" East 15.00 feet to the POINT OF TERMINATION also being the
55.00 westerly of the centerline of said Margarita Road;
~:io~arrington, L.S.'~
License Expires 9-30-00
Date:
13451p.lgl
NO.
DIRECTION DISTANCE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
NO.
N 88' 02
N 1'58
N 5°24
N 88° 48
N 1°58
N 79~ 46
N 88° 02
N 88°31
DELTA
Cl 6°44'57"
C2 15'00'29"
13'05'26"
C4 3'26'22"
C5 0°16'44"
10" E 5.00
14" W 9.27
22" W 114.33
36" W !5.OO
14" W RAD 9.27
38" E 45.98
10" E 11,00
52" W RAD 15.00
RADIUS LENGTH
1000.00 117.80
1000.00 261.94
2044.00 467.00
2055.00 123.36
2070.00 10.08
PARCEL "Et' <.-' PARCEL 'A'
PER LLA NO, 31 PER LLA NO, 31
RECORDED 7-20-1993
INST. NO. 278787
APN 921-O90-056
N78' 51'47~V RAD
~ N78'52'48~ RAD
EXHIBIT '8'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
/ usr/projooTo/r.grD/~_ 1_~ 154/ 134p~T 15.Qgn
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
3050 CHICAGO AVE.. SUITE 1OO. RIVERSIDE. CA
SCALE 1'=200' IDATE JANUARY 7, 1998
PLOT DATE: 21-APR-1998
9250'
JN 13134
T. R. SEC. ROAD NAME:
CERTIFICATE OFt ACCEPTANCE
BASBMBNT
(Government Code Section 2T28
THIS IS TO CI
in real propenT granted by the
dated
from
Corpnrafion.
TEMlaCULA, b for the
Tcmecula on behalf the
m~Jerslgned City
Council
contained Ordinance No. 669.
Grantee to recordation tlmreof
by i!s duly
Dated: CiP/of Temecula
, ReS 2i~5, nxp.
CiP/of Temecula
PROJECT NAME:
THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR
THE BENEFIT OFt THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
ENTITLED TO BE
RECORDED WITHOUT FEE
(GOV, CODE 6103)
RETURN TO THE OI:q:~CE
OF THE CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92590
W.O.# '
POR RECORDER'S USE
BNG\FORM.4
CORPORATION EASEMENT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
LGA-7, Inc., an Tillnob Corporation,
~reby GRANT(S) Io the City of Temecula an easement for the maintenance
of traffic signals
the real propcaT in rite City of Tcmecula, County of Rivcmidc, State of Calitbmia, described as:
Shown on Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached
hereto and, by fhis reference, made a part hereof.
STATB OF ~'ALIPORHIA' :Lq4. t ~oI.S }SS.
COU~ OF }
beam ~, fik ~g~i~, a Nma~ ~blic in a~ tbr said
p~o~lly ~ to ~ (or p~ to ~ on the basis of
~atisfa~o~ evideme) to ~ the ~mon(s) who execut~
within imtm~m as .
~ on ~lf of
the ~fi~ Ill.in ~, sod ac~mwl~g~ to me
such co~lion exe~t~ the within i~mmment pu~ant m its
by-laws or a ~olution of its boa~ ofdi~ctors.
WITN~S ~ I~ and official seal.
LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Its: CO.L. t~hi+~
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of ~ property or Rights ~ Access and
Temporary Construction A/~eement as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION iD~ i ~ ~ ~
AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TF~FFIC SIGNALS OVER A PORTION OF LOT 11S PER
MAP OF TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY FILED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359 OF MAPS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST.SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 FLIED
IN PARCEL MAp BOOK ~ PAGES ~ THROUGH /"/'~, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN THE PARCEL LINE OF LOT 'B' OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.
28530-1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE PARCEL LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, FROM A TANGENT
BEARING OF NORTH 21°37'48' EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGIE OF 38°29'58" ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 23.52 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL LINE, NORTH 60~07'46" EAST A DISTANCE OF
13.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0g°32'02· WESTA DISTANCE OF 57.67 FEET TO A POINT IN A NON-TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1281.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 26°13'12' WEST, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1~39'18· ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 37.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 720 SQUAR~ FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT 'B", ATTACHED.
H:~"IAWTHO- I~F-ASEM E- l~_.D,~PM234302.WPD
March 9, 1998 (3:35pm)
Page I
XHIBIT "'B"
PORTION OF LOT 115
MAP OF TEMECULA LAND
AND WATER COMPANY
LOT 2'7
?iV] 28530- J
R=35.00'
-'~ ,~..,.,~='38° 29' 58"
~ ~ L=2~. 52'
~ T=I 2.22 '
POB.~
I oo
'~, 1o39'18
$~8=37. O0 '
.50'
SCALE: 1" = 40'
LOT J J5
TEJVJECULA LAND
AND WATER cOM?ANY'
MB 8/359
SAN D JEGO COUNTY
EASEMENT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS OVER LOT 140 PER MAP OF
TEMECULA LAND AND WATER AS FILED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 358 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CAEFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY'
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
r~M_MENCING AT A POINT IN THE "ORTHEA_ST]ERLY PARCEL LINE OF PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP · Z8Sa0-*~ F~LED IN PARCEL ~aAP BOOK ~ PA(~ES__3~THROUG~ ?',~ , ~N THE O~Fi
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY - CE OF
, CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT BEING THE
NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE SHOWN AS N 38°41 ~38' W 68.74~,
THENCE, ALONG SAID PARCEL LINF~ SOUTH 38°41~J8· EAST A DISTANCE OF 0.89 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE CONCENTRIC WITH AND DISTANT 25.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY,
~I_F~?_U..R__ED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT"A" OF SAJD PARCEL MAP, HAVING
RADIUS OF 1908.00 FEET, SAID INTERSECTION REING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CONCENTRIC CURVE AND SAID PARCEL LINE, FROM A
TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 52°35'52" EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°18'01' ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CONCENTRIC CURVE A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 38o41~8- EAST A DISTANCE OF 67.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 303.00 FEET:
THENCE, SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 3°17'30" ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 17.41 FEET;
THENCE, RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE, SOUTH 54°3E53- WEST A DISTANCE OF 10.00
FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 293.00 FEET, SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE BEING THE
NORTHEASTERLY PARCEL ENE OF SAID PARCEL 5;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NON-TANGENT CURVE AND SAID
PARCEL LINE, 'FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF NORTH 35o24'07· WEST, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 3°17'30· ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38"41'J8" WEST A DISTANCE OF 67.85 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 848 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT 'B', ATTACHED.
H:~'IAWTHO- I~=AS EME- 1~;D~:iSE696.WPD
April 16, 19~18 (10:43a111)
Page 1
XHIBIT "B '"
PORTION OF LOT 140
MAP OF TEMECULA LAND
,~,,~.~" AND WATER COMPANY
~_ / ~-A~~18 01"
'1'~O~ /~ O. 00' L~T J 4o
~..-~. 00' TE~E~ULA LAN~
- AND WATER ~~ANY
SCALE: 1" = 40'
LEGEND
R=303.00'
¢,',?' ,1-'" *~, A=3' 17' 30"
,,r- L=17.41 '
' ' ec~',~- T=8.71 '
' ' ~ R=293.00'
' ~' A=3' 17'30"
L=I 6.83'
..~~,;. T=8.42'
54° 35' 53 "W
'~'~ 10.00'
.-- ~,% \ ~ ',
(RAD)
COUNTY
ITEM
12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
~~.City Manager/City Council
oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
August 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for
Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Overland Drive Overcrossing at
Interstate Route 15, Project No. PW95-11
PREPARED BY:
William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
Steven W. Beswick, Project Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to execute
both documents.
Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection
and testing fees in the amount of $4,470.00.
BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the project, the City received a sewer facilities
agreement for the sewer line relocation for Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15,
Project No. PW95-11 from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD).
This sewer facilities agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the
relocation of the sewer which is included in the project. Approximately 370 linear feet of
existing 15" sewer main located within an existing easement will be removed. The contractor
will construct approximately 400 linear feet of new 15" sewer main located northeast of the
intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Overland Drive within a new sewer easement.
The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities
and EMWD's responsibilities during construction. The City's contractor will construct the new
line within a new sewer easement acquired by the City. The City will also convey the new
sewer line facilities to the District through a Bill of Sale (see Exhibit "J"). The District will
inspect the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance.
The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
- l- r:~agdrpt\95\0825\pw95-1 l.swdajp
10.
11.
12.
13.
B. Relative to Financial Participation CharGes and Other District CharGes
For those portion(s)/unit(s) of the Subject Facilities which have not been
completed (as defined below) by Sponsor on or before Januar~ 27, 2000, the
amounts of all applicable Financial Participation Charges and other District
Charges to be paid by Sponsor shall be subject to adjustment to reflect the then
per unit amount applicable at the time the involved portion(s)/unit(s) have been
completed, all as determined by District. Sponsor agrees to pay the full
adjusted amount of such District Charges prior to District's acceptance of the
facilities and provision of service to the involved unit(s).
For the purposes of this Agreement, the word completed shall:
1)
Relative to the Subject Facilities, mean those water and/or sewer
facilities which have been accepted and placed into service by District;
and
2)
Relative to the units of the Subject Development, mean those units which
have been certified for occupancy by the County of Riverside or the
involved city (as appropriate).
all as determined by District.
Co
Relative to Deferred Financial Participation Charges and Other District Charges
For those portion(s)/unit(s) of the Subject Facilities where Sponsor has
"deferred" payment of fees, the amoun~ of all financial participation charges and
other District charges shall be subject to the applicable then in effect per unit
charge. Such deferred per unit charges shall be paid by Addendum to this
Agreement prior to District's acceptance of facilities and provision of service
for each fnvolved portion(s)/unit(s).
Hold Harmless
District and Sponsor each hereby agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless from
any and all claims for damage or damages to property or injuries to persons arising by
reason of or in any manner connected with the activities provided by the other party
and/or its contractor(s). Such indemnification shall include attorneys' fees and court
costs.
Preparation of This AGreement
This Agreement shall not be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be
construed as if both parties prepared it.
Purpose of Captions
Captions to Paragraphs are for convenience purposes only and are not part of this
Agreement.
Bindina Provision
This Agreement is binding on the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.
Page 3
Developer
w.oJC.O.#
Est'r Initials
Implementing Facilities:
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
COST ESTIMATE OF SEWER FACILITIES
CITY OF TEMECULA Proj OVERLAND DR. SEWER RELOC.
95-254 I.DJS.A.# U-8 Dato 07/13/98
CFW Sup'r Initials V/B Typist Initials CFW
Yes No X
Wo~ Authorization:
~t Plant Notification:
Yes X No ~ Sewer Backflow Valves:
X ' Offaltg ~ Norm
Required Lots:
Yes No X
Not N__,~_~: X
X
Sewer line In._~_lin~ion: 387 IF.- 15' DIA- VCP SEWER MAIN
B. Installation of Manholes and Cleanouts: 2 EA.- 48" STD. MANHOLE
C. Ml~. Installation: 1 EA-- MODIFY EXISTING 48' DIA. MANHOLE; 365 L.F. REMOVE OR
ABANDON EXISTING 15" DIA- SEWER MAIN
D. T.V. 387 feet of Sewer Line
SUBTOTAL 1:
Contingencies:(10%) (Subtotal 1)
~AL 2: (Contingencies + Subtotal 1)
Enginesring (by Developer's Engineer)
EMWD Inspection
( 10
( 10 %) (Subtotal 2)
%) (Subtotal 2)
E~tWD Plan Review**
As Bnilts 2
sheets x $135/sheet***
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SEWER
· * Estimated costs to be incurred by EMWD.
2 sheets or less S 1000
3-9 sheets
One system, water or sewer $1500
~ systems, water nnd sewer $2500****
10 sheets or more
One system, ~ater or sewer $2000
Two systems, water and sewer S3000'***
· "($?0/sheet if you have water and sewer in same sheet)
'"'(apply half the amount to each system cost estimate)
Exhibit "C"
$ 19,350
$ 3,200
4,650
· $ 190 ·
27,390
2,740
30,130
3,010
3,010 '
1,000 '
270 '
37,420
ao
So
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
ao
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
OBLIGATIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES
Sponsor's Obligations/
Responsibilities Relative to:
Financial Participation
Preparation of Construction
Plans/Specifications
Construction of the Subject Facilities
Inspection of Construction
Field Engineering Surveys, Compaction and
Materials Strength Tests, Disinfection Req.
Preconstruction Conference/Project Coord./
Designation of Authorized Representative
Construction and Operate/Maintain Permits
Easements
Grant Deeds
Cost Accounting Records
Conveyance of Ownership
Payments to Cover District's Expenses
Environmental Information & Assistance
Payment of Other Applicable Charges
Improvement District Annexation/Formation
Assessment District Requirements
Street Addresses
Water Pressure Condition
Treatment Plant Location Notification
Sewer Backflow Device
Special Terms and Conditions
Pursuant to
Paragraph
1
2
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
District's Obligations/
Responsibilities Relative to:
Financial Participation
Plan Review and Approval
Construction of Portions of the Facilities
Inspection of Construction
Determination of Final Total Costs
Acceptance, Ownership, and Service
Responsibilities
Pursuant to
Paragraph
1
2
3
4
10
11
Appli-
cable
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
[ ]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
[ ]
[ ]
IX]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Appli-
cable
[ ]
IX]
[ ]
IX]
IX]
IX]
Not
Appli-
cable
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
IX]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
IX]
IX]
[ ]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
Not
Appli-
cable
IX]
[]
IX]
[]
[]
[]
Page 1 EXHIBIT D
5o
7o
designate those who have authority to represent Sponsor relative to the furnishing and
installation of the Subject Facilities and shall in~nediately advise the District of any
subsequent changes in such authorized representation.
Inspection of Construction
District shall be responsible for inspecting the.work to be performed by Sponsor's
contractor for compliance with the approved plans and specifications.
District's inspection personnel shall have the authority to require that any and all
unacceptable materials, workmanship and/or installation be replaced, repaired or
corrected by Sponsor's contractor at contractor's expense.
Field Engineerina Surveys. ComPaction and Materials Strength Tests. and D~sinfection
Requirements
Sponsor's engineer shall provide all field engineering surveys associated with the
construction of the Subject Facilities and/or related work.to be performed by Sponsor's
contractor, as determined necessary by Sponsor's engineer, Sponsor's contractor,'and/or
Dlstrict's inspection personnel, at Sponsor!s direct expense. Sponsor shall promptly
furnish to District all field notes and grade sheets, together with location, offset,
and attendant data and reports, resulting from field engineering surveys and/or
proposed facility design changes, all of which have been prepared in accordance with
accepted professional engineering practices, and allow District sufficient time to
approve or make any required facility design changes resulting therefrom prior to
construction.
Sponsor shall be responsible for paying all soil compaction, concrete and steel
strength tests and report costs associate~ with the Subject Facilities required by
Sponsor's engineer, appropriate public agency officials and/or District inspection
personnel. Full-time professional soils (compaction) testing and full trench
certification are required. Sponsor shall contract with a soils testing firm approved
by District. A final report shall be required fully certifying trench compaction prior
to acceptance of facilities. Sponsor shall promptly furnish results of all such
compaction and concrete and steel strength testing to District for its evaluation as
to compliance with the specifications. District shall'make every reasonable effort to
complete the evaluation within 72 hours after its receipt.
Relative to water facilities, Sponsor's contractor shall be responsible for performing
all disinfection procedures required by District and the costs associated therewith.
Construction and Operate and Maintain Permits
Sponsor shall be responsible for obtaining a Construction Permit from the involved City
or County agency for those portions, if any, of the Subject Facilities which are to be
constructed within an existing City street and/or County road. At the same time such
construction Permit is obtained by Sponsor, the involved City or County agency will
issue an Operate and Maintain Permit to District, which will become effective upon the
completion of the involved Subject Facilities and District's acceptance thereof.
Easements
Sponsor shall furnish to District, without cost, duly executed easement document(s)
which assure District's unequivocal right to own, operate and maintain the Subject
Facilities.
Grant Deeds
Sponsor shall, for the dollar consideration, if any, set forth in Exhibit C attached
to this Agreement, furnish to District a duly executed Grant Deed(s) conveying to
District clear unencumbered fee title to the parcel(s) of land identified on the map
attached to this Agreement as Exhibit I.
Page 3 EXHIBIT D
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
District's assessment districts and there has been a subdivision of the subject
property subsequent to said assessment district formation, Sponsor shall pay the
assessment at the time of agreement execution or go through an apportionment of
assessment district procedures administered by the District personnel.
bl
Upon completion of the construction of the involved assessment district financed
facilities and the determination of the final combined and individual cash
assessments, the District shall determine and establish the amount of the
portion, if any, of the cash assessment for each parcel within the involved
assessment district which is to be credited by District toward partial payment
of applicable District front footage and financial participation charges.
Street Addresses
Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement (or as soon thereafter as possible),
Sponsor shall furnish to District a list of approved street addresses for the
development to be served by the Subject Facilities.
Water Pressures
If pressures are expected to be in excess of '80 psi, Sponsor shall install, at his
expense, a pressure regulator and/or relief valve. If pressures are expected to be
less than 40 psi, Sponsor shall install, at his expense, a booster pump and low
pressure switch, to be owned, operated and maintained by the subsequent lot owner.
Service will not be provided if available system pressure is determined to be lower
than 20 psi. Sponsor agrees to inform subsequent lot owners of high or low water
pressure conditions and will hold District harmless from any damages resulting from
such condition. A Pressure Agreement executed by the Sponsor/lot owner will be
recorded with the County holding District harmless from any damages caused by low or
high pressures.
Treatment Plant Location Notification
In the event any portion of the Subject Development is located within one quarter (1/4)
mile of a District treatment plant facility site, Sponsor shall execute a Notice of
Condition, recorded with the County, acknowledging the existence and location of the
treatment plant and the possibility of nuisance conditions under certain operational
and climatic conditions. Such Notice will .run with the real property and shall be
binding upon subsequent property owners.
Sewer Backflow Device
Sewer backflow devices will be required for those lots, if any, specified on the
construction drawings. Sponsor will furnish and install, at Sponsor's cost, sewer
backflow devices in accordance with District standards and specifications, prior to
project or lot release by District.
Special Terms. Conditions and/or Requirements
Sponsor shall fulfill all the Special Terms, Conditions and Requirements set forth in
Exhibit K attached to this Agreement.
Page 5 EXHIBIT D
B.
C.
D.
~..
F.
H.
I.
J.
K.
DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED
Document(s):
City/County Road Permits
Easements
Deeds
Separate Cost Accounting Records
Bill of Sale
Petition for Improvement District
Annexation/Formation
Billing for District's Financial Part.
List of Street Addresses
Water Pressure Agreement(s)
Treatment Plant Location Notification
Preliminary Cost Accounting Records
Due Date
(a)
(a)
(a)
(b)
(¢)
(¢)
Not
Appli- Appli-
IX] [ ]
IX] [ ]
IX] [ ]
IX] [ ]
IX] [ ]
[ ] IX]
(d) [ ] IX]
(c) IX] [ ]
(a) [ ] [X]
(a) [ ] [X]
(a) [X] [ ]
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Prior to Preconstruction Meeting.
Within 90 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Facilities.
Upon Sponsor's execution and delivery of this Agreement to District.
Within 30 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Facilities.
EXHIBIT F
PAYMENT TO BE MADE BY SPONSOR
(REVISED)
Ao
Co
Do
Payment for:
Estimated District Engineering &
Inspection Expenses
Estimated District Material &
Construction Expenses
Nonreimbursable Frontage Fees:
(1) Basic Water
(2) Special Water
(3) Basic Sewer
(4) Special Sewer
Financial Participation Charges:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Domestic Water System Facilities
Fire Storage & Fire Line Capacity
Domestic Water System Facilities
(Landscape Area)
Sewer System & Reclaimed Water
Facilities
Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity
Amount
4,470.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Eo
F.
G.
H.
Water for Testing Purposes
Meters
Source Control Fees
Per Lot Processing Fee
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL
LESS PREVIOUS FEES PAID ON
AMT. TO BE REMITTED WITH AGREEMENT
4,470.00
0.00
4,470.00
Attachments: G-1 Frontage Memo - Nonreimbursable Frontage Fees
G-2 Computation of Financial Participation Charges
*FEES DEFERRED UNTIL SERVICE IS REQUESTED
Appli-
IX]
£ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
£ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Not
Appli-
[ ]
IX]
IX]
IX]
Ix]
IX]
IX]
Ix]
IX]
IX]
[x]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
EXHIBIT G
BILL OF S~T.W.
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
City of Temecula -Overland Drive Sewerline Relocation (Seller), hereby bargains,
conveys, and grants unto the Eastern Municipal Water District (District), a public
agency of the State of California, the following described personal property, such
conveyance to become effective upon completion of the construction/installation by
Seller's Contractor(s) and acceptance by the District of such personal property,
which is more specifically described as:
The Subject Facilities which are to be furnished and constructed by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) as described and provided for in that certain
Agreement, by and between Sponsor (Seller in this Bill of Sale) and
District, dated , to whic~ this Bill of Sale
is attached as Exhibit J.
Seller hereby warrants that the above-described personal property is free and clear
of any and all encumbrances. In this regard Seller hereby agrees to protect and
defend (District's) right to own, operate, maintain and provide services through all
the personal property hereby transferred to District's ownership wherein the defense
of the District's right to own, operate, maintain and provide services as provided
hereinabove results from any person or entity's alleged rights to any of the personal
property described hereinabove or for any monetary damages resulting from the
nonpayment by Seller of any person or entity having the right to file a lien against
said personal property. Seller further agrees to indemnify the District for any and
all losses which may be occasioned or suffered by the District as a result of any
claims by others as to clear title of the personal property covered hereby.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this __ day of
19
Notary Public in and for the
State of California
Expiration Date
By:
Dated:
SELLER
(Signature)
(Print Name and Title)
EXHIBIT J
COMPUTATION OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES
PART 1 - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PERTINENT INFORMATION TO ESTABLISH EDU
CALCULATION:
PART 2 - EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) CONVERSION:
WATER: __ gpd + 440 gpd = EDU
SEWER: gpd + 235 gpd = EDU
PART 3 - EDU CONVERSION TO FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES:
WATER RELATED CHARGES
1. Water Back-up Charge:
EDU x $
2. Landscape Plan Check No.
gpd x $
, AMAWD in GPD:
3. Fire Flow - 1500 GPM:
__ bldg. sq.ft. + 1500
gpm x .30 min. x $0.40
4. Fire Flow Line Capacity Charge:
.50 x fire flow charge
*FEES FOR SNACK BAR AND C0~JNITY CENTER
TOTAL
SEWER RELATED C~ARGES
1. Sewer Back-up Charge:
EDU x $
2. Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Charge:
EDU x $
TOTAL
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
S 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL Water and Sewer Related Charges S 0.00
PART 4 - PAYMENT OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES:
Payment of said water and sewer financial participation charges will be:
[ ] Made by Sponsor upon execution and delivery of this Agreement to District
(see Paragraph 9.B. of Agreement); or
[ ]
Deferred by Sponsor and paid, by Addendum to this Agreement, prior to
District's acceptance of facilities and provision of service for each
involved portion(s)/unit(s) (see Paragraph 9.C. of Agreement).
NOTE: PAID FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES SHALL REMAIN APPURTENANT TO THE REAL
PROPERTY PARCEL OF LAND TO WHICH IT IS ASSIGNED, REGARDLESS OF CHANGES IN
OWNERSHIP, AND WILLNOTBE TRANSFERABLE TO AN~ OTHER PARCEL OF LAND NOR REFUNDED
TO ANY PARTY OTHER THAN THE CURRENT OWNER OF THE LAND.
ATTACHMENT G-2
ITEM
13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.,~"'~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
April 28, 1998
Resolution in Support of Railroad to Railread Grade Separation at Colton,
California
Prepared by:
Susan W. Jones
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE RAILROAD TO RAILROAD
GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT AT COLTON, CALIFORNIA
BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Transportation Commission is requesting the support
of the City of Temecula in securing state and federal funding for a major railread improvement
project, separating the Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific railroad's main corridors
where they cross at Colton, California.
Attached for your review is a letter from Mayor Jack van Haaster, Vice Chairman of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 98-
Letter from Mayor Jack van Haaster
R:\agenda.rpt\RCTC 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE RAILROAD TO RAILROAD
GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT AT COLTON, CALIFORNINA
THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CiTY Of TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the efficient movement of people and goods is essential to the health and
economy of the region and the nation; and,
WHEREAS, freight railroads play a pivotal role in interstate commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are the major ports of entry on the
Pacific Coast; and,
WHEREAS, tremendous growth in railroad operations, particularly intermodal and other
through-freight, has resulted in significant community impacts; and,
WHEREAS, the demand for rail shipments will continue to grow with the expansion of the
Ports, the completion of the Alameda Corridor, and population growth in the region; and,
WHEREAS, the main lines of the Burlington Northem Santa Fe and the Union Pacific, the
only major railroads operating in Southern California, carry the majodty of rail freight traffic between
the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, the rest of the nation, and Mexico on their routes
through the Inland Empire; and,
WHEREAS, these railroads must cross each other at Colton Junction; and,
WHEREAS, Colton Junction has been identified as the major choke point for rail traffic
in the region, where an average delay of fourteen minutes per train triggers substantial congestion
and blockages along the corridors; and,
WHEREAS, diesel emissions caused by multiple locomotives idling along the corridors
while waiting to cross Colton Junction further exacerbate the unhealthful air quality in the South
Coast Air Basin, the worst non-attainment area in the nation; and,
WHEREAS, railroad congestion has resulted in many freight shipments being shifted to
diesel trucks on the region's already congested highways; and,
WHEREAS, railroad congestion in Southern California has caused expensive delays to
local shippers as well as to manufactures and others throughout the country; and,
WHEREAS, these same main line freight corridors are utilized for the provision of
commuter passenger rail (Metrolink) and intercity passenger rail (Amtrak) service, whose
operations are consistently impacted by freight congestion; and,
WHEREAS, insufficient operation capacity has delayed the implementation of other
passenger rail services, including service between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley; and,
Resos 98-
1
WHEREAS, the federal Transportation Equity Act for the twenty-first Century (TEA-21),
identifies the "Alameda Corridor East" and the "Southwest Passage" as eligible corridors for federal
infrastructure funding, and further identifies NAFTA-related improvements as a priority for federal
funding; and,
WHEREAS, Colton Junction is located at the eastern terminus of the Alameda Corridor
East and near the western terminus of the Southwest Passage, and most NAFTA rail freight into
or through Southern California is carried on the BNSF and UP main lines across Colton Junction;
and,
WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has identified
these corridors and NAFTA improvements as priorities within its recently adopted Regional
Transportation Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the State of California through Camtrans is initiating a Project Study Report
to further refine the project and identify appropriate resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby endorses and supports the efforts of the Riverside County Transportation Commission in
securing the necessary federal and state funding to construct a separation of the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific railroads at Colton Junction.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 25th day of August, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Resos 98- 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 25th day of August, 1998, by the following vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 98-
3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
August 12, 1998
Mayor and City Council
City of Temecula
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
The Riverside County Transportation Commission is seeking your support in securing state and
federal funding for a major railroad improvement project, separating the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe and Union Pacific railroads' main corridors where they cross at Colton, California.
Though physically located in San Bernardino County, impacts caused by the current configuration
are shared by communities throughout the Inland Empire and the region.
As you are probably aware, railroad freight traffic has increased substantially in the last few years,
and, with expansion of Southern California's ocean ports, operational demand will continue to
grow. Most mainline rail freight between Southern California, the rest of the U.S., and Mexico
passes over Colton Junction. We will continue to see more and longer (up to 8,000 fee0 freight
trains passing through the region, further exacerbating the existing congestion, community
impacts, and delays to passenger trains. Colton Junction has been identified as the major choke
point.
Efficient movement of people and goods is essential to the economy of the region and to its
environment and quality of life. When one mode experiences congestion delays, travel is shifted
to .another. In this case, we have already seen shipments historically moved by rail shifted to
trucks on highways. Additional diesel emissions caused by railroad and highway congestion
~rther contribute to the ur..healthful air quality- experienced in this region.
The railroads have committed significant investments in stronger locomotives and infrastructure
improvements; however, the public sector must participate in a project such as the Colton railroad'
separation in order to protect its interests, including reliable passenger access on the privately.
owned freight corridors. Preliminary cost estimates for constructing a railroad "fly-over" with
connections and advanced signals range between $25 million and $35 million. The recently-
adopted federal transportation authorization bill (TEA-21) includes funding categories that may
be accessed for this purpose. Meanwhile, the state has directed Caltrans to begin a Project Study
Report, further defining the project and the preliminary design work.
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 · Riverside, California 92501
(909) 787-7141 . FAX (909) 787-7920
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AUGUST 11, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:19 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts,
and Stone.
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Ford.
Also present were Acting General Manager Kicak, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 14 and July 28, 1998.
Reduction of Landsca~3e Bonds - The Preslev Companies (Hiqhwav 79 South between
Avenida de Missions and Country Glen Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Authorize the reduction of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract No.
23267-4 and 23267-5 to a 10% warranty amount of $3,200 - The Presley
Companies;
2.2
Authorize the reduction of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract No.
26861 to a 10% warranty amount of $2,863 - The Presley Companies;
2.3 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and Surety.
Completion and Acceptance of the ADA Improvement Project (Project No. PW97-09
CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one-year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
3.2
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of
the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3. The
motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Director Ford who was absent and Director Lindemans abstaining with regard to
the approval of the July 28, 1998, minutes.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker presented a brief update on the construction progress of
Margarita Community Park and the Winchester Creek Park, noting the anticipated completion
date is Spring 1999.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:55 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, August 25, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: ~Herman D. Parker,
DATE: August 25, 1998
Director of Community Services
SUBJECT:
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: C~ Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Edge Construction for $1.35
million, for the construction of Margarita Community Park. This project is currently under
construction and approximately 50% completed. The Master Plan includes parking, lighting,
tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink,
tennis courts, and ballfield lighting. It is anticipated this project will be completed in the Spring,
1999.
On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Terra Cal Construction for
$601,000, for the construction of Winchester Creek Park. Construction is moving forward on
schedule. The restroom, play structure and picnic shelter are installed. Winchester Creek Park
is a 4.5 acre passive use park consisting of a tot lot, picnic facilities, an outdoor basketball
court, a sand volleyball court and open turf areas. Staff anticipates this project to be
completed in early 1999.
On March 17, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement and
Scope of Services, in the amount of $55,000, with AMS Planning and Research, for the
preparation of a ten (10) year Cultural Arts Master Plan for the City of Temecula. A
community wide workshop was held on August 18, 1998. Additionally, focus group meetings
were held for Visual Arts, Performing Arts and Historic Preservation on August 18 and August
19, 1998. It is anticipated this project will be completed in approximately nine (9) months.
On May 12, 1998, Council awarded a design contract in the amount of $58,000 to LPA, Inc.,
to cover site selection, programming and site master planning for the Temecula Library.
The first meeting of the Library Design Project Committee was held on July 21, 1998 and the
second held on August 18, 1998. A tour of other library sites is scheduled for September 10,
1998.
~:'ok~AGEN~AS~O8 Aufust 18, 199~
It is anticipated the phase of the project will take approximately six (6) months to complete.
City Council awarded a contract to Dahl, Taylor & Associates for the design of a temperature
control system at the Community Recreation Center gymnasium and a construction contract
was awarded to 1'~ Mechanical on April 14, 1998. This project is complete and the
gymnasium was reopened to the public on August 18, 1998.
The Sports Park Sidewalk Project is currently in final plan check. Modifications were made to
the landscaping and irrigation plans. Staff anticipates this project will be out to bid in August,
1998.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of
Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the
Temecula Valley.High School Tennis Courts. The agreement will be brought forward to the
Board of Education for approval on August 18, 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting
and maintenance of eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of
Temecula, in exchange for the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation
program. This project is currently in the design phase.
Phase II of the Temecula Duck Pond project is currently out to bid. The bid closing date is
August 27, 1998. Staff will bring forward to the City Council a recommendation to award a
construction contract in September, 1998.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department is presenting the second annual summer
concert series, co-sponsored by Target of Temecula and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley.
Concerts were held on Sunday, July 19 and Sunday, August 16, at the CRC Amphitheater. The
third concert in the summer concert series, Concert on the Green, will be held on Sunday,
September 27, 1998, at the Rancho California Sports Park.
R:~t~AGENDAS~i!~9~8 August 18, 1~
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUGUST 11, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:21
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Roberts, Stone,
and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBER: Ford.
Alsb present were Acting Executive Director Kicak, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 14 and July 28, 1998.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exceDtion of Agency Member Ford who was absent and Agency Member Lindemarts
abstaininc~ with regard to the approval of the July 28, 1998, minutes.
At this time, the City Council reconvened.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUSINESS
2. TransDortation in Old Town Temecula - Peoole Mover Proclram
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Consider allocating funds and providing staff direction on the proposed
transportation program to assist Old Town during construction.
Agency Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Management Analyst Adams presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that
the use of a horse-drawn carriage with staff for every weekend until November 15, 1998, would
require a $12,000 appropriation.
Commenting on the loss of business the Old Town merchants have and will continue to
experience, Chairman Lindemans spoke in support of a People Mover Program, which should
be owned and operated by the City during the construction period as well as after.
Finance Director Roberts clarified that a General Fund allocation may be made to the
Redevelopment Agency for the transportation program and th~,t the allocation could be paid
back to the General Fund once the Redevelopment Agency tax increment is received.
Speaking in support of utilizing a trolley in Old Town during the construction period as well after
the construction period, Agency Member Comerchero relayed his opposition to utilizing a people
mover for Old Town, viewing it as defeating the City's overall accomplishment to walk Old Town.
With regard to utilizing the City's golf cart, Agency Member Roberts addressed issues such as it
not being street legal as well as liability issues.
Mr. Ed Dool spoke in support of utilizing a golf cart transportation for Mondays through Fridays
and for utilizing the trolley for Saturdays and Sundays.
MOTION: Agency Member Roberts moved to allocate $12,000 from the General Fund for Old
Town Transportation which is to be repaid by the Redevelopment Agency to the General Fund
once the tax increment is received. The motion was seconded by Agency Member
Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency
Member Ford who was absent and Agency Member Stone who abstained.
At this time, City Council recessed.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:41 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, August 25, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAI~C.E/3
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/Redevelopment Agency
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager ~
August 25, 1998
Old Town People-Mover
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: This item is being presented for discussion at the request of
Councilmember Lindemarts.
BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting held on August 11,1998, the issue of moving
people through Old Town with an 8-10 passenger golf cart "limousine style" was discussed. This
cart was proposed as a form of construction mitigation to enhance pedestrian access to store fronts
during construction. In lieu of purchasing such a vehicle, City Council authorized an additional
$12,000 to be allocated towards the rental of a horse-drawn carriage, staffed with an Old Town
Ambassador for weekend use. Councilmember Lindemarts has requested that the topic of a
people-mover be brought back for re-consideration (Attachment A).
This weekend the horse-drawn trolley/Old Town Ambassador was accepted with great success
from both the merchants and visitors alike. The absence of the City-owned golf cart this weekend
was due to the fact it had not been made "street legal" for operation.
The purchase of the proposed commercial vehicle, an 8 adult passenger "Resort Villager XL" as
depicted in Attachment B, can be made street legal and in compliance with the existing City
ordinance. A representative from Carryall, the manufacturer of this Club Car, has encouraged the
City to take advantage of a one-week trial period at no cost, to see if this vehicle serves the needs
of the City and that of Old Town Temecula.
FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of a people-mover has not been included in the 1998-99
budget, therefore, based on City Council action, a loan would be required from the General Fund
Unappropriated Reserve and reimbursed as RDA tax increment becomes available. Attachment
C outlines the associated costs of purchasing this vehicle.
Attachments
j-14-98 08:46A Karel Lindemans 909 676 8893 P.01
To my fellow councilmen and Staff:
Re: People Mover.
cc:
R. Bradley
J. Kicak
J. Meyer
A. Adams
A decision was made to have a horse drawn vehicle (with 20 passengers) o:a
Saturday's and Sunday's moving people through the town. That is wonderful
and a "fun thing!"
However, these establishments are open every day, not only on week-ends.
I agree that we like to make it a"-~-a]k-~g tov~'-We have'a parking lot on the'
south end and one on the north end and hopefully a parking lot or 2 in the
middle.
However, a "walking town" is a town where people "window shop" and
every steo of the way there is a shoo (and a window) this is what makes
such a ''walk" interesting and profitable to the merchants (if, what is
displayed in the window will entice the "walker" to come in and buy).
If you observe the "walkers" vou will note that - even a uarkina lot -
between the stores is enough to make them - turn around - and walk no
further.
If a person parks his/her car on .the South Side (we will have a great parking
lot with over 200 spaces) and this person starts to walk he will go no furthey
then 4th street where the "main body of shops" will stop.
If they can jump on the people mover they will do so and the shops between
4th and 6th will benefit because at every block the people mover will stop!
They will continue this "ride" and see our museum and the Mural.
Now, the people who park their car on the North End look down the street
and see the 900 feet with only 7 shops. The main body of shops is 3 blocks
away. (far further then a parking lot!!) they will not w~lk! But they will hop
on the people mover and the Main Body of shops will receive them. Cff
course as I said before: The People Mover will stop in the middle of each
block!
Attachment A
^ug-14-98
11:02A Kat'el Lindemans 909 676 8893 ~' p.O~l ~
pasc 2
After we have totally built out old Town ~emecula and the shops are ¢1osc
together the people mover can be sold.
Please reconsider this denial and take ii from a 66 year old men who has been
all over the world and: "have seen more m~ople "moved" then he ceres to
admit". -
Sincerely yours, .~
After I sent this memo: here are a few more thoughts!
From the 6th sweet parking lot a "real trolley" will bring people to
Target, Mervin and the Mall and of course bring them back. Money?
R.C.T.C./R.T.A./Advertising on the Trolley!
There also will be a trolley to bring people to the Indian Gaming Center.
There is a third trolley for the wine country.
The people who parked at Mervin and the Mall can take the Trolley to
Old Town.
This is what this is aH about. Temecula is more then just Old Town.
Karel.
Attachment A
RESORT VILLAGER
MULTI-PASSENGER LUXURY VEHICLES.
For people-moving applications requiring a high degree of com~brt and convenience,
Resort Villager is a first-class choice. With a capacity of up to six passengers (eight passengers
in our XL model), you'll
enjoy the economv and "i I-~~-/L/_~.~ ~ ]1_ [ _~,~__~
efficiency of being able to
transport more people in
tbwer trips.. ....-"~., i.-,~ .~ ........._. ..........................
Resort Villager XL iShown with optional fold down rear seat. I
Attachment B
TO:
City. of Temecula
Attm Am-on Admm
(909) 694-1989
Golf, Transportation and Utility Vehicles
Club Car, Inc.
2220 Railroad Street
Corona, California 91720
(909) 735-4675
Fax (909) 735-7358
RESORT VILLAGER GASOLINE PROPOSAL
UTILITY VEItICLE ~ STANDARD EQIJIPMENT:
Four cycle OHV 361 cc 11 HP engine, oil pressure lubrication system with external full flow filter, TCI electronic ignition with
electrome RPM limiter, 12 volt, 325 cold cranking amp battery, 35 amp charging capacity. Automatic ground speed sensing
governor, fully s.~chronized forward and reverse transmission, 7 gallon capacity. fuel tank, dash mounted fuel gauge,
and oil warning light, reverse warning buzzer. Twin I Beam welded aluminum chassis with ArmorFlex body. Dual rear wheel
brakes with east iron drums, serf-adjusting multi-latch parking brake, self-adjusting rack & pinion steering, leaf spring
suspension with hvdranlic shock absorbers on all four wheels, double reduction heat treated helical gear drive unit, slip
resistant floor mat, molded seamless vinyl seats, vinyl side rub rails, 6 ply DOT power rib tires with bead lock wheels,
anti-sway bar.
*Two Bench Seats facing forward (optional third seat, facing rear)
'1500 lb capacity. or up to six (6) passengers.
LIST
Resort Villager (Gasoline)
CUSTOMER
UNIT COST
$6,602.00
Accessories
Fixed rear scat $368.00
Green Body $120.00
CtLrome Hub Caps $27.00
Canopy Top (White Only) $664.00
V~rmdehicld $92.00
Directional Signals $24.00
Surrey Fringe Top $225.00
Custom Graphics $300.00
Differential Guard Included
Hour Meter Included
Preparation: $200.00
SubTotal: $8,622.00
$ale~ Tax: Exempt
Transportation (GA to CA) Exempt
TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE: L $8,622.00 1
Comments: SEAT COLORS: Beige, White, Grey & Black. The quote for the Custom Graphics item is a
an approximate price only. We will confirm that cost, once artwork is provided to us to verify exact design.
Delivery: (after receipt of order) Terms:
Customer:
Accepted by:
Title:
Date:
Title: J't~-pl~ilnozz6-Territory l~II~er
Date: 7/29/98
Prices quoted are those m effect at the time of quotation and are guaranteed subject to acceptance within 30 days.
All credit terms must be approved by CLUB CAlL INC. prior to delivery. Customer to submit requited credit information
for credit approval.
CLUB CAR ·
INGERSOLL-RAND
Attachment C
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager
August 25, 1998
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of August 25, 1998 for the
Redevelopment Department.
This report covers housing, redevelopment and economic development.
HOUSING
First Time Homebuyers Proczrem
· Funding in the amount of $400,000 for FY 97-98 is now available.
Residential Improvement Proorams
Since the program started, twenty-eight projects have been completed and 29 are in process.
The majority of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement.
Temecula O.N.E.
Crime Free Multi-Housing Program certificates have been awarded to Rancho West, Vintage
View, Morning Ridge, Summer Breeze, Creekside, Sycamore Terrace, Acacia, Rancho California
and Margarita Summit Apartments.
North Pujol Redevelopment Pr~ect
The Affirmed Housing Group of Escondido is finalizing the financing plan which includes
Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Tax Credits. Plans have been submitted for Development Plan
approval. The proposed project will rehabilitate the existing 38 apartment units and develop
18 new units on the vacant acre of land. In addition, Affirmed is negotiating with an adjacent
property owner to enlarge the project. The additional property would yield 20 more units.
OLD TOWN
Old Town Street$caoe Improvement Projects
Construction began July 1, 1998. This project is scheduled for completion on
November 15. Merchant meetings are being held every Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. at City
Hall and every other Monday at 6 p.m. at Butterfield Square in Old Town.
At the August 11 Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to hire Ginney
Reynolds as the Old Town Ambassador to answer questions and provide assistance to
the businesses in Old Town on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays.
Facade Improvement Non-Conforming Sion Proaram
The following facade improvement project is underway:
Long Branch Antiques (Formerly NAPA Auto Parts)
- facade renovation
The following facade improvement projects are completed:
Temecula Creek Plaza (southwest corner of Sixth and Front)
- repair and paint
The Bank Restaurant
- paint
The following facade improvement applications are being processed:
Second Street Automotive
- complete facade renovation
Rancon Building
- Repaint Trim
Old Town Temecula Market Study
Staff has also met with several other interested property and business owners. The market
study was presented to the Council on June 16, 1998. Copies are available free of charge
at City Hall.
Old Town Promotion
A Construction Hat Giveaway launched the Old Town Promotion encouraging residents to
shop in Old Town. The City purchased thirty-six thousand plastic construction hats and
stickers with slogans, "to be distributed to children visiting Old Town. There were three
sessions of community volunteers affixing labels.
In response to concerns from the Old Town Merchants, an Ad Hoc Old Town Promotion
Committee has been formed to assist staff in building a promotional campaign for Old Town
during construction of the streetscape improvements.
The Billboard located at the West Side of 1-215, North of Santiago (near Dan's Feed and Seed))
is in place. The cold air balloon contract was awarded to local firm Attraction Balloons.
Old Town Farmer's Market will continue to operate from 8:00 a.m. to noon every Saturday but
may move to the North end of Old Town when the construction moves toward 3~ Street.
Old Town Communication
Old Town Review - An informative newsletter recapping the previous week's events and
updated information on the Streetscape project is distributed to the merchants in Old town on
a weekly basis. Also, included in this newsletter are special annual events being planned by
the merchants scheduled for September and October.
ADVERTISING
Local Print Advertising
Inland Entertainment Roundup - An ad and editorial was placed in this monthly entertainment
publication. Approximately 26,00 copies are distributed throughout Riverside and North San
Diego County.
The Country Review - An ad and editorial was placed in this local magazine. Approximately
10,000 copies are distributed in Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Menifee and Canyon Lake
areas.
Valley Business Joumal- Full-page editorial and ad appeared in this local monthly publication
at no cost.
An ad was placed in The Press-Enterprise, Californian, and Rancho News to announce the
plastic construction hat promotion.
Public Service Announcements informing the public of road access and street closures in Old
Town are being sent each week to the local papers as well as KATY and KFROG radio stations.
The announcements will also appear on the City's website.
Press releases sent out to the media include:
· Construction Hat Giveaway Kicks-Off Old Town Promotion
· Free Trolley Service Provided for Old Town Shoppers/Old Town Ambassador (included in
press release)
· So Long Summer Sale in Old Town Temecula
· Have Lunch in Old Town (Chamber of Commerce)
· Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Supports Old Town (Chamber of Commerce)
· Councilman Jeff Comerchero wrote an article on Old Town for the Rancho News
Community Voices Column
Non-Print Media
A 30-second cable ad is currently in production with TCI Media. The Old Town ad is planned
to run for three months starting the end of August.
An ad placed with National Cinema Network for movie theater advertising at the SoCel Tower
Plaza, Temecula and SoCel Celifomie Oaks, Murrieta, will air August 28. Old Town's 8 - 10
second color message will appear every 4½ minutes during all ½ hour intermissions. The
movie theater ad will run for three months and will encourage people to visit and shop in Old
Town. Free construction hat offer is also mentioned.
Print Advertising - Outside the Area:
Advertising in three major antique publications include: Antiques & Collectables, West Coast
Peddler and The Collector. Antiques & Collectables came out and met with the committee
encouraging them to help themselves by holding free appraisals or other types of activities in
their stores to bring shoppers in. The Collector magazine spent a day in Old Town meeting with
Councilman Jeff Comerchero, City Staff and Merchants. The publication will feature Temecula
in their next publication.
01d San Diego Gazette - Monthly tourism publication heavily distributed throughout San Diego
County. A ½ page ad was placed along with editorial. The publication will also feature The
Temecula Valley Film Festival.
A half-page black & white ad for Old Town will be placed in the Arts Council Design House '98
Program. This target audience is ideal for Old Town merchants to pursue.
Qther
Flyers and posters are being distributed throughout the community in markets, shops, Chamber
of Commerce and in Old Town. Posters are displayed as well throughout the city.
Visit Historic Old Town message appears on the auto marquee sign.
Special promotions are in the planning stage.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Temecula's Corporate Brochure is completed. Brochures will be distributed at trade shows and
to prospective businesses looking to expand or relocate.
The Corporate Personnel Relocation Assistance marketing insert is completed. Through the
City's Housing Assistance Program, selected businesses who relocate or expand in Temecula
may take advantage of financial assistance programs which provide eligible employees with
deferred payment loans to assist in purchasing homes or rental assistance payments. The insert
will be included with the new corporate brochure in Temecula's business kit.
PubliciW
Temecula will be featured in Outlook Magazine in their special California issue. Temecula will
also be placing an ad. Staff has been working this month on Temecula's editorial for the
publication. The publication has a wide distribution including site selectors, CEO's, investors,
and trade shows. Outlook sends inquiries responding to our ad and the City follows up with
them.
Leads and Inouiries
In the month of June, we responded to 4 leads and 11 inquiries. In the month of July, we
responded to 5 leads and 1 inquiry.
Fast Track
Temecula Creek Inn is currently working on a 20,856 expansion which will include
approximately 25 additional rooms.
Appleton Bectronics located in the Westside Business Center and will be utilizing the City's Fast
Track Program.
The Bostik building will consist of 140,000 sq. ft.; Phase I - 45,625 sq.ft.; Phase II - 94,375
sq. ft. They are planning to open July 1998.
Four-Sher's 226,000 sq. ft. industrial office building is currently under construction.
Completion date is slated for early summer '98.
Expansion & Rolocation
Creative Components, now located on Business Park Drive is expanding to an existing 16,656
sq. ft. speculative building on Winchester Road.
Seeculatlve Buildin,
Approximately 300,000 sq. ft. of speculative industrial space are in various stages of
development in Temecula. Four-Shat Development is developing two speculative buildings
which are planned to serve either manufacturing, distribution or assembly business users. One
development includes a 38,300 sq. ft. industrial building and the second encompasses 28,700
sq. ft. both located on Business Park Drive within the Rancho California Business Park.
Utilizing the City's Fast Track program, SPT Holdings currently has two 46,000 sq. ft.
specula~ve buildings under construction in the Winchester Highlands Business Park. The
developments are designed for an industrial/warehouse or office user.
San Diego-based CW Assets have currently constructed five light industrial buildings using the
Fast Track program. The buildings range in size from 9,490 sq. ft. up to 11,492 sq. ft. and are
located in the Winchester Business Center.
TOURISM
City staff is currently participating on the Tourism Summit Task Force sponsored by the
Chamber of Commerce. The task force is designed to develop a tour package for Temecula in
cooperation with hotels, golf courses, wineries, and transportation companies made available
to tour operators at one price. There have been several meetings with the next meeting
scheduled for Friday, August 21.
Monthly calendar of events and Old Town special events press releases continue to go out to
the media.
Attachments: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Report
Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation Report
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
August 7, 1998
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temeeula CA 92590
Dear Ron:
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of
Temecula. This is the month of July at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights
· 8 businesses requestexl infonnation on sta~ing or relocating their business in Temecula.
Committee Highlights
· Membership Committee's Chamber Ambassadors attended 12 ribbon cuttings.
The Tourism Committee is aggressively working to provide group packages that will be
promoted to tour operators. A separate task force has been formed and is meeting on a regular
basis.
· Local Business Promotions Committee will be taking sign-ups for the Holiday Shop Temecula
First Campaign to take place during the month of November, 1998.
· The Education Committee expects to present the updated Education Brochure in September,
1998. The brochure is an additional marketing piece used for families relocating to Temecula.
The brochure compliments all other marketing brochures by staying consistent and using the
city's marketing design.
· The Government Action Committee is considering doing an Electronic Town Hall. This will
allow face to face long distance conversations with legislators from Washington, local
legislators and interested businesses.
Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
· 550 Winery Brochures to the American Textiles Association who will be attending a retreat at
the Pala Mesa Resort.
360 Visitor's Guides to Anderson Publishing for distribution to Old Town Merchants and
240 Visitor's Guides to area hotels.
· 120 Visitor's Guides and 80 Old Town Maps to TVCC Weekend Visitor Center in Old Town.
· 120 Visitor's Guides and 80 Old Town Maps to One Song for distribution to visitors in Old
Town Temecula.
· 75 Temeeula Brochures to PRA Destination Management for distribution to clients.
· 50 Winery Brochures to Pauma Valley Country Club to be used for membership packets.
· 35 Travel Packets, 35 Old Town Maps, 35 Visitor's Guides and 35 Winery Brochures to the
Temecula Valley Car Club for a car rally in Temecula.
· I Temeeula CD ROM to Bryan Portillo for the Visit USA Travel Fair '98 held in Tokyo,
Japan.
· Staff member is attending Old Town Marketing Meeting on a weekly basis and Chamber is
assisting with marketing construction hats.
Activity Report
· Overall mailing are up 36.9 percent from last year.
· Overall walk-ins are up 45.29 percent from last year.
Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Local Business Promotions, Tourism, Education and
Governmental Action Committees. If you have any question regarding this information, please
conmet me at the Chamber.
Mayor Ronald H. Roberts
Mayor Pro Tern Steven J. Ford
Councilman Jeff Comerchero
Councilman Karel F. Lindemans
Councilman Jeffery E. Stone
Ron Bradley, City Manager
Marilyn Whisenand, Redevelopment Consultant
Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
TVCC Board of Directors
PHONE CALLS TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS
Calendar of Events
Special Events
General Information
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
CHAMBER REFERRALS
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS TOURISM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
SPECIAL EVENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL WALK-INS
MAILINGS
TOURISM
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
TOTAL MAILINGS
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
For July, 1998
Chamber Vis. Center
This Month This Month
Total
Year-To-Date
296
61
182
829
1,368
2818
637
3019
6,827
12,427
141
35
1,389
5,019
79
8,031
1180
428
10,267
44,076
674
43,492
9O
81
54
4O6
152
48
745
51
1,627
66
6
96
11
179
1,734
671
455
4,109
1068
499
5,968
414
14,740
220
155
111
486
1445
887
760
2,606
GRAND TOTALS
PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS
MAILINGS
THIS MONTH
8,031
1,806
486
YEAR-TO-DATE
69,052
16,315
3385
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber
July, 1997
Chamber
July, 1998
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 575 296
Calendar of Events 296 61
Special Events 298 182
* General Information 355 829
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,524 1,368
RELOCATION 334 141
DEMOGRAPHICS 248 35
CHAMBER 1,822 1,389
CHAMBER REFERRALS 6,956 5,019
MISCELLANEOUS 249 79
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 11,133 8,031
Percentage
Increase
-48.52
-79.39
-38,93
133.52
-10.24
-57.78
-85.89
-23.77
-27.85
-68.27
-27.86
* Categories adjusted in 1998 to more accurately track volume.
MAILINGS
TOURISM 185 220 18.92
RELOCATION 78 155 98.72
DEMOGRAPHICS 92 111 20.65 ·
TOTAL MAILINGS 355 486 36.90
WALK-INS
TOURISM 194 90 -53.61
* CALENDAR OF EVENTS N/A 81 N/A
* SPECIAL EVENTS N/A 54 N/A
* GENERAL INFORMATION N/A 406 N/A
RELOCATION 219 152 -30.59
* DEMOGRAPHICS N/A 48 N/A
CHAMBER 830 745 -10.24
* MISCELLANEOUS N/A 51 N/A
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS N/A 179 N/A
TOTAL WALK-INS 1,243 1,806 45.29
Economic
l~eveloPme.' nt
orporat~on
Temecukt l/alley
August 17, 1998
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Agency/TVEDC Contract - Activity Summary
The following highlights the activities of the TVEDC during the month of July:
Business Development
During July, TVEDC received four requests for proposals from the California
Trade and Commerce office. We were unable to submit a response for any of
the leads. Two of the requests required rail access and two required enterprise
or empowerment zones. Responses to eleven inquires for various business
enterprises were mailed during the month. Two packages were extensive
requiring research for labor statistics and weather/seismic information.
Introductions were made to two health care professionals for investors wanting
to develop an open MRI center in the area. Information regarding the existing
hotel/motel industry was provided to local newspapers. Staff continues to work
on the feasibility study for the incubator project.
Marketinn Outreach
TVEDC along with several other economic development organizations in the
Inland Empire are hosting the first annual Air Quality Summit to be held on
August 21, 1998. Staff has participated in several organizational meetings for
the summit during the month. Staff attended the quarterly economic
development workshop presented by third district supervisor Jim Venable.
TVEDC staff attended a site tour for the possible location of the SW Riverside
County Workforce Development and One-Stop career Center on July 16, 1998.
TVEDC was invited to attend the presentation by Dr. Michael Bazdarich, Director
of UCR's Inland Empire Economic Data Bank and Forecasting Center, of the
Center's economic model for the Inland Empire.
Post Office Box 1388 · Temecula, CA 92593-1388 · Office 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/695-5126
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
August 17, 1998
Page Two
Business Relations
Staff assisted the Business Relations committee in redesigning the tri-part folder
which presents the merits of being a member of TVEDC. A new program was
presented to the Business Relations committee by Chairman, Randy Williams.
The new program will assist the committee members in their efforts to survey the
businesses already in the community and will also increase the probability of
helping businesses to stay in the community by using a red team approach to
problems detected during the visitation process. Staff spent considerable time
helping prepare the collateral materials for the new program.
Administration/Or.qanization
Staff revised and resubmitted the annual budget and work plan for the proposed
sub-regional organization.
This concludes the written summary of activity for the month of July.
if there are questions concerning this report,
Very/tr ~ours~
Jn~td i Staats
erim Executive Director
Please call
WINCHESTER HILLS
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUGUST 11, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority was called to
order at 7:41 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Chairman Comerchero presiding.
PRESENT: 4 AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
Lindemans, Roberts, Stone,
and Comerchero.
1 AUTHORITY MEMBER: Ford.
Also present were Acting Executive Director Kicak, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 28, 1998.
MOTION: Authority Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Authority Member Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Authority Member Ford who was absent and Authority Member
Lindemarts who abstained.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORT
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:41 P.M., the Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority meeting was formally
adjourned to Tuesday, August 25, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
A'I-rEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
[SEAL]
ITEM
14
APPROVAl~A~, ~'"'
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN,~E
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 25, 1998
Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels
Per Ordinance 91-18, Chapter 6.16
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Hold a Public Hearing and receive testimony for or against the confirmation of special
assessments against vacant parcels of land within the City for hazardous vegetation abatement.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND
REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION.
DISCUSSION:
During the period of June 13, 1997, through June 30, 1998, the posting of thirty (30) day Notices
to Abate were sent to legal owners of record of vacant properties that had been determined to
contain potentially hazardous vegetation. Information regarding the appealing of these notices was
provided on the Notice to Abate.
During the period of July 13, 1997, through July 30, 1998, reinspection of the posted properties was
made to identify those properties still containing hazardous vegetation.
On July 13, 1998, Fire Prevention Services along with the Citys Weed Abatement Contractors,
were directed to begin clearing those vacant properties found to be still containing hazardous
vegetation. During Fiscal Year 97-98, a letter of demand for payment was sent to the respective
property owners where hazardous vegetation was abated by City contractors.
Attached, marked as Exhibit A, is a listing of the properties, that have been abated by the City's
contractors, with the amount of the proposed assessment to be recorded against the parcel. The
costs listed include an administrative fee of $150.00.
All initial inspections and noticing was performed by Fire Prevention Services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City will be the cost incurred for the recording of any
Special Assessment against parcels for forced abatement. There are currently adequate funds in
Account No. 001-162-999-5440, Weed Abatement, for this purpose. No further funds will need to
be appropriated for this program.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF
HAZARDOUS VEGETATION.
WHEREAS, following a public hearing held on April 23, 1991, this City Council
of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance No. 91-18 which became effective on June
28, 1991 and which provides for expedited abatement of hazardous vegetation from
vacant lots and parcels, and;
WHEREAS, said abatement of hazardous vegetation has been completed on
each of the parcels as described in the attached list of parcels (Exhibit "A"), at a cost
equal to the costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation on each such
parcel; and
WHEREAS, following a public hearing this Council has heard all objections of
property owners liable to be assessed for the costs of abatement; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, State of
California, in regular session assembled on August 25, 1998, that the list of parcels and
costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation for each parcel is hereby
confirmed and that said costs shall constitute special assessments against the
respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of the respective
parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of the respective assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such liens shall attach upon recordation in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside of a certified copy of this
Resolution, and that the City Clerk is hereby directed to make such recordation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted
to the Treasurer-Tax Collector who shall enter the amounts of the respective
assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current
assessment roll, and shall collect said assessments at the same time in the same
manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes as provided by Government Code
39577.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of August, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL #
909-152-005-0
909-200-001-0
919-043-003-1
919-051-004-7
919-152-005-0
919-161-002-5
919-210-006-0
919-440-006-1
921-020-067-5
921-111-002-7
921-211-001-5
921-330-024
921-730-004
921-730-005-3
921-730-006-4
921-730-007-5
921-730-008-6
921-730-009-7
921-730-010-7
921-730-010-8
921-730-012-9
921-730-013-0
921-730-014-1
921-730-015-2
922-062-17-7
922-110-018-6
922-110-019-7
922-170-009-4
922-210-042-6
922-210-047-1
940-310-044-9
940-320-002-2
940-320-003-3
940-320-004-4
940-320-005-5
944-161-019-5
945-020-001-9
945 -020-002-0
945-110-013-8
945-120-007-4
945-130-010-7
945-140-010-8
945-150-009-9
945-150-010-9
945-150-011-0
OWNERS NAME
Demarco Anthony/Pamela; Huanggalen trust
Temecula One Properties LLC
Lee Shio Chao
Finnell, Helen
Williams, Beverly Trustee, Roger
Wang, Ungjin
Schriever, Mary, Tobin Daniel
Ashby, Jamison J, Donna
Cavadias, Stephen
Soukar, Mostafa
Fiacco, Charles
Chang Ik Hoon
North Plaza Lic
Pujol Joint Venture % Taylor
Weilert Jan E., Deborah
Yi Hyo J.
Tomond Prop
Margarita Canyon LLC
Firestone, John
Rancho Cal Homeowenrs Comm. Assoc
Pritchard Robert M
Augustine, John, Denise
Rios, Jorge
Simonelli, Sal
Mathieu, Normand
Vierra, Leonard
Watson, William
Johnson William, Patricia
Barr Edward c/o Irwin Weinhaus
ASSESSMENT
AMOUNT
727.50
1,159.94
660.60
787.64
1,231.46
619.20
1,453.24
1,042.98
2,710.26
734.00
1,193.60
2,780.58
905.40
1,214.60
1,038.50
525.00
525.00
985.80
926.84
882.60
773.16
525.00
906.68
540.00
570.80
660.60
1,761.82
1,459.60
703.20
3 671.04
1 239.38
6 557.70
1 721.94
1 229.42
1 215.28
1 160.56
1 032.36
1 272.98
966.00
1,629.14
470.00
1,738.54
2,099.54
1,200.24
1,800.74
945-160-006-7
950-070-007-8
950-100-012-4
950-100-013-5
950-100-014-6
950-100-015-7
950-110-020-2
Gurainick, Wayne
Pacitto, Peter
REO Department LLC
Ranel Development
1,586.28
1,386.80
921.50
1,096.16
677.48
683.62
1,453.88
TOTAL 66,816.28
ITEM
15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO'~~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA~ ~,~ "~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Directo~ :'>
August 25, 1998
Planning Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Sections of the City's
Development Code Pertaining to On-Site Storage of Vehicles (Including
Recreational Vehicles) in Residential Zones
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0349; and
2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION
17.24.020.D OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
Authorize a six-month grace period for compliance with the new ordinance and direct staff
not to enforce the provisions of the new ordinance until March 8, 1999.
BACKGROUND:
At their September 23, 1997 meeting, the Council directed staff to amend the Development Code
to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) pertaining primarily to recreational vehicles. The Council's
discussion focused on the appropriateness and need for the City to enforce a regulation that is
generally incorporated into Home Owner's Association CC&R's. In the end, the Council decided
that the City should not assume any responsibility for enforcement of Home Owner's Association
CC&R's.
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97,CC1 8/19/98 mf 1
Since deletion of this Section of the Development Code would require an Ordinance Amendment,
this item was placed on the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission agenda for Commission
action. However, upon further consideration, the Council directed staff to conduct additional
research on this matter. At the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission meeting, staff requested
this item be continued to the December 1, 1997 Planning Commission hearing to allow staff to
begin research on this matter. Staff then requested this issue be continued off calendar at the
December 1, 1997 meeting until the research was conducted.
Staff placed this item on the Commission Business section of the February 2, 1998 Planning
Commission agenda and requested that the Commission provide direction to staff regarding three
potential options for recreational vehicle storage in residential zones. After reviewing the options
and receiving public testimony from seventeen residents, the Commission unanimously (4-0, with
Commissioner Soltysiak absent) recommended to the City Council that the existing Development
Code provisions remain in effect and be enforced with the existing penalties. They also
recommended that additional staff resources required for effective enforcement be considered by
the Council. Of the seventeen residents who spoke at the Commission hearing, sixteen were in
favor of enforcing the existing provisions of the Development Code.
This item was tentatively scheduled for the March 17, 1998 City Council meeting; however, staff
was directed to remove this item from that meeting's agenda re-schedule it for the upcoming joint
City Council/Planning Commission Workshop.
At the joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop held on April 21, 1998, the Planning
Commission was directed to consider the information and direction provided to them and provide
a recommendation to the City Council regarding an Ordinance regulating the on-site storage of
vehicles in residential zones. Staff reviewed the comments and suggestions from that meeting and
provided issues and options for the Commission at their meeting of May 6, 1998. The Commission
reviewed the issues which were accompanied by potential options and received testimony from
sixteen (16) residents at that meeting. The Commission continued this item to their June 3, 1998
hearing and directed staff to bring back a draft Ordinance. The Commission's reviewed the draft
ordinance and continued the item to their July 1, 1998 meeting. The Commission recommended
approval of the draft ordinance at the July 1, 1998 meeting by a 5-0 vote. There were two new
Commissioners at this meeting and they were provided all Staff Reports and Minutes regarding this
item.
SPECIFIC ACTION:
The Commission is recommending that the City Council adopt the revisions to Section 17.24.040
of the City's Development Code. In summary, the Commission recommendations are as follows:
· Vehicles (as defined in the Ordinance) may be temporarily parked in the front yard for a period
not to exceed two (2) days.
· No vehicles may be permanently parked in the front yard.
· Vehicles may be permanently parked or stored on the side or rear yard, provided, that such
area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by a
fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height.
· A maximum of 2 vehicles may be parked or stored on the side or rear yard of a parcel of land
at any one time.
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97.CC1 8/19/98 mf 2
· All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or adjacent properties
shall be paved with an impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the weight of the
vehicle.
· A six-month grace period from enforcement shall be granted from the adoption of the
ordinance.
· Add a definition of "Actual Front Yard" to Section 17.34 (Definitions) of the Development Code.
This definition will clarify the area in the front of the house, between the street and the house,
where permanent vehicle parking/storage is prohibited.
Section 17.24.020.D.1 through 17.24.020.D.6 of the Development Code as amended is provided
in Attachment No. 3.
Adding Definition of Actual Yard to Section 17.34 (Definitions) of the Development Code
Section 17.34. of the Development Code is amended to include the following definitions:
· Yard, Actual Front: The space extending across the full width of the front of the lot, the depth
of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the front lot line or street right-of-way line
and the primary structure on the lot.
· Yard, Actual Rear: The space extending across the full width of the rear of the lot, the depth
of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the rear lot line and the primary structure
on the lot.
· Yard, Actual Side: The space between the setback line of the main building and the side lot line,
extending from the front yard to the rear yard; the measured distance of the yard shall
represent the shortest distance between the side lot line and that portion of the main building
nearest the line from which the measurement is taken.
Additional Staff Resources
The Commission also requested that the City Council fully enforced the Development Code and
that the necessary staff resources be provided to effectively enforce the Code. This would likely
require additional staff resources. According to Code Enforcement staff, complaint driven
enforcement of this item required approximately 30-40% of their time. In order to effectively
enforce these regulations, one-half of a Code Enforcement staff person would be required at the
current time. The cost to the City (in 1998 dollars) would be $27,259.00 annually. This figure
would likely be higher in future years. It should be noted that, if an additional staff member is not
added, other areas of code enforcement will be impacted. In addition, with the current residential
growth in Temecula, at approximately 800 new homes per year, the limited staff resources would
be stretched even thinner.
Correspondence Received
Staff received many letters and phone calls regarding this item. Views ranged from strict
enforcement of the Code to relaxing the Development Code provisions. Letters received prior to
the Commission headngs have been included in the July 1, 1998 Planing Commission Staff Report
(see Attachment No. 3). Those letters which have been received prior to the August 25, 1998 City
Council meeting have been include as Attachment No. 5.
R:\STAFFRPT',349PA97.CCI 8/19/98 mf 3
FISCAL IMPACT:
Should City Council decide to hire a half-time Code Enforcement Officer as recommended by the
Planning Commission, an appropriation of $27,259.00 would be required.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ordinance No. 98- - Page 5
Section 17.24.020. D. 1 through 17.24.020. D.6 of the Development Code - Page 11
Initial Environmental Study - Page 17
Planning Commission Staff Report (July 1, 1998) - Page 26
Planning Commission Minutes (July 1, 1998) - Page 27
Correspondence - Page 28
R:\STAFFRPT'G49PA97.CC1 8/19/98 mf 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97.CCI 8/19/98 mf 5
ATTACHMENT NO. I
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION
17.24.020.D OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
o~inances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.24.020.D.1 through 17.24.020.D.6 of the Development Code is
amended to read as follows:
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
1. Parking-Residential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the provisions listed below. Vehicles, as used in this subsection A shall include, but not
be limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, including those defined in Section 18010
of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers,
camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-
motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle,
automobiles, motorcycles, mopeds and any similar item. Parking shall be defined as the standing
of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while
actually engaged in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers as described below (d).
Storage shall be defined to mean to place or leave in a location for later use.
a. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97.CC1 8/19/98 mf 6
b. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other
required or authorized off-street paved parking area.
c. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall be paved with an impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting
the weight of the vehicle. Such area shall be maintained in a usable condition free of potholes and
broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust, without accumulation of loose material or
other deterioration.
d. Except as provided for in Section F below, commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks,
trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable
recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width
that are detached from a motor vehicle may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard; provided,
that such area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties
by a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height.
e. Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five
percent of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
f. Except as provided Herein, recreational vehicles including those defined in
Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers,
campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment,
other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle
temporarily parked within public view within the Actual Front Yard, unscreened corner side yard or
unscreened side yard abutting a street may be parked or left standing for periods of time not to
exceed two (2) consecutive days for loading and unloading the vehicle. No vehicle parking or
storage shall be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
g. No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, a width of eighty inches, a height of seven feet or a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked
on any portion of a residential lot unless:
It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
ii. It is in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to,
or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved in such activity; or
iii. It is in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid home
occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of the Development Code.
Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas
shall be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by
guests.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
infraction.
j. In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off-street parking
space shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem parking shall be
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97.CC1 8/19/98 mr 7
permitted. Guest parking shall not be permitted in required setback areas.
k. A maximum of 2 commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks,
semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a
motor vehicle may be parked or stored on the side or rear yard of a parcel of land at any one time.
2. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of .5 acres or more unless part
of a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use permit.
a. All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
b. Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are not permitted.
3. Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under
Repair. The following provisions shall apply to any commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles
including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers,
motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and
commercial equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are
detached from a motor vehicle, in all residential districts, and to all sites in any other district used
for residential occupancy:
a. Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless
conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street
and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
b. Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part
thereof, which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an essential or
legally required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or
accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally
located fence, wall or equivalent screening.
c. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and (b) of this
section, emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of any of the above
conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot, may be conducted for an aggregate
period of up to twenty-four hours in any continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of the
screening requirements.
d. For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shall
have the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of California, where such
definitions are available.
located:
Parking - Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
R:~STAFFRPT\349PA97.CC1 8/19/98 mf 8
a. On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
b. On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the lot
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
c. On a lot or parcel of land separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or
less) from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
ii.
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
and
iii. The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or
parcels would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
it is intended to serve.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor
area.
e. On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same ownership. Same
ownership includes property that is subject to a binding recorded lease for not less than ten years
from commencement of use. The parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to,
any other property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property requiring the
parking.
6. Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or
parcel of land as the use served.
Section 3. Section 17.34.10 of the Development Code is amended to include the
following definitions:
"Yard, Actual Front: The space extending across the full width of the front of the lot, the
depth of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the front lot line or street right-
of-way line and the primary structure on the lot."
"Yard, Actual Rear: The space extending across the full width of the rear of the lot, the
depth of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the rear lot line and the pdmary
structure on the lot."
"Yard, Actual Side: The space between the setback line of the main building and the side
lot line, extending from the front yard to the rear yard; the measured distance of the yard
shall represent the shortest distance between the side lot line and that portion of the main
building nearest the line from which the measurement is taken."
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
R:~STAFFRPTX349PA97.CC1 8/19/98 nff 9
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect six (6)
months after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against
the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ~ day of
,199__.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ,199__, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRFr~349PA97.CCI 8/19/98 mf 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
SECTION 17.24.020.D.1 THROUGH 17.24.020.D.6 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENTS
R:\STAFFRPT\349PA97.CCI 8/19/98 mf 1 1
Section 17.24.020. D. 1 through 17.74.020. D.6 of the Development Code Amendments
Section 17.24.020.D.1 through 17.24.020.D.6 of the Development Code as amended is provided
below. Commission changes have been indicated as a strike out text for deletions and italicized
text for additions.
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
Parking - Residential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall
be subject to the following provisions listed below. Vehicles, as used in th!s
subsection D1 shall include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles, as including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and
Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, houso cars, campers,
camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, and other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are
detached from a motor vehicle, automobiles, motorcycles, mopeds and any similar
item. Parking shall be defined as the standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or
not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while actually engaged in
loading or unloading merchandise or passengers as described below (d). Storage
shall be defined to mean to place or leave in a location for later use.
The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
b. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other
required or authorized off-street paved parking area.
All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall bo pavod with a pormanont paving matodal be
paved with an impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the
weight of the vehicle. Such area shall be maintained in a usable condition
free of potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust,
without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration.
Except as provided for in Section F below, commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health
and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers,
camper she/Is, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that
are detached from a motor vehicle Vohiclos may be parked or stored only
in the side or rear yard; provided, that such area is screened from view from
the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by a fence, wall, or
equivalent screening material at least five feet in height. Parking shall bo
dofinod as tho standing of a vohiclo, woathor occupiod or not, othorwiso
than tomporarily for tho purposo of and whilo actually ongagod in loading or
unloading morchandiso or passongors. Storago shall bo dofinod to moan
to placo or Ioavo in a location for lator uso.
e=
Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five
percent of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is
greater.
12
Except as provided iR herein, vohiclos recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks,
trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other
large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motorized
vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor
vehicle temporarily parked within public view in roquirod or authorizod
parking aroas within the Actual Front Yard, unscreened corner side yard or
unscreened side yard abutting a street sh3!! may be parked or left standing
for tomporary periods of time not to exceed five two (2) consecutive days for
loading and unloading the vehicle. No pormanont vehicle parking or storage
shall be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
Vehiclos, as usod in this sor.,tion shall includo, but not bo limitod to,
commorcial vohic, los, automobilos, trucks, trailors, motor trucks, somi-
trailors, motorcyclos, mopods, campors, campor sholls, boats or othor largo
portablo rocroational and commorcial oquipment.
No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, or oxcoods a width of eighty inches, or oxcoods a height of seven feet
or oxcoods a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked on any portion of a
residential lot unless:
It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
iii.
It is in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a
service to, or on, the property where the vehicle is parked,
while actively involved in such activity; or
~1111.
It is in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid
home occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of
the development code.
No privato, noncommorcial vohiclo which oxcoods a gross woight of
ono and ono half tons, or oxcoods a width of oighty inchos, or
oxcoods a hoight of sovon foot or oxcoods a Iongth of twonty fivo
foot; and no trailor, somitrailor, boat or portablo rocroational
oquipmont shall bo parkod or storod within tho front yard, comor sido
yard or sido yard abutting a stroot unloss:
iv I.
It is not a commorcial vohiclo and is parkod for a tomporary
poriod of timo not to oxcood twonty four hours;
vii.
It is involvod in loading or unloading activity; and
]3
jh.
ki.
¥1111.
It is parkod in oomplianoo with any othor applicablo city
ordinanco.
Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas
shall be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by
guests.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
infraction.
In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off-street parking
space shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast.
Tandem parking shall be permitted. Guest parking shall not be permitted in
required setback areas.
ko
A maximum of 2 commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks,
trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper she/Is, boats or other
large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motorized
vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor
vehicle may be parked or stored on the side orrearyard of a parcel of land
at any one time.
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of .5 acres or
more unless part of a master planned development, subject to approval of a
conditional use permit.
All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled
parts are not permitted.
Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under
Repair. The following provisions shall apply to any commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and
Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper she/Is,
boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-
motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor
vehicle, motor vohiclo, rocroational vohiclo, campor, campor trailor, trailor,
unmountod campor, trailor coach, motorcyclo, boat or similar convoyanco in all
residential districts, and to all sites in any other district used for residential
occupancy:
Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be
prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an
area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally
14
located fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part
thereof, which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from
which an essential or legally required operating part is removed, shall be
prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory building, or in an
area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally
located fence, wall or equivalent screening.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and (b) of this
section, emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of
any of the above conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot,
may be conducted for an aggregate period of up to twenty-four hours in any
continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of the screening
requirements.
For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shall
have the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of
California, where such definitions are available.
Parking - Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
located:
a. On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the lot
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
On a lot or parcel of land separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or
less) from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve,
provided:
The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
ii.
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
and
iii.
The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or
parcels would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
it is intended to serve.
Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor
area.
On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same
ownership. Same ownership includes property that is subject to a binding
recorded lease for not less than ten years from commencement of use. The
parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to, any other
property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property
requiring the parking.
Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or
parcel of land as the use served.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
]7
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
5.
6.
7.
8.
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose approval
is required:
Planning Application No. PA97-0349
(Zoning Amendment - Development Code)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-
6400
City-wide in the residential districts
Same as No. 2:
Multiple residential designations
Multiple residential designations
Amendments to Chapter 17.24 of the City's
Development Code, pertaining to the
storage and parking of vehicles (including
recreational vehicles and trailers)
N/A
None.
R:\STAFFRPT~349PA97.CC1 8/4/98 mf ,] .]
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potemially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning
[ ] Population and Housing
[ ] Geologic Problems
[ ] Water
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Transportation/Circulation
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources
[X] None
DETERMINATION
[ ] Hazards
[ ] Noise
[ ] Public Services
[ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on
the environment,7~GATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(,/ Date
Printed Name
R:\STAFFRPT\349PA97.CC1 8/4/98 mf '] 2
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b.Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rupture?
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land?
h. Expansive soils?
i. Unique geologic or physical features?
WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a.Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
ix]
ix]
ix]
ix]
ix]
ix]
Ix]
ix]
ix]
IX]
ix]
ix]
IX]
ix]
ix]
IX]
R:\STAFFRPT\349PA97.CC1 8/4/98 raf ~ 3
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding?
c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, cLissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
$. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e. Hazards or bamers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
IX]
No
Impact
IX]
ix]
IX]
ix]
[x]
ix]
IX]
ix]
[x]
ix]
IX]
ix]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
[1
R:\STAFFRPTL349PA97.CCI 8/4/98 mf 1 4
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
b.Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards?
e.Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
£]
[]
[]
[]
[]
£]
[]
[]
[]
£]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
£]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
£]
[]
[]
No
Impact
IX]
ix]
Ix]
IX]
Ix]
Ix]
IX]
IX]
IX]
ix]
ix]
IX]
Ix]
IX]
ix]
R:\STAFFRPTL349PA97.CCI 8/4/98 mf ~ 5
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental services?
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create lighi or glare?
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
13.
14.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
IX]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[x]
[x]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
'[ ]
[x]
IX]
IX]
[x]
[x]
ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
IX]
[x]
IX]
R:\STAFFRPTk349PA97.CCI 8/4/98 mf 1 6
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect umque ethnic cultural values?
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
c. Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
IX]
IX]
Ix]
IX]
IX]
[x]
[x]
[xl
R:\STAFFRPTL349PA97.CC1 8/4/98 mf '] 7
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Environmental Study, amending portions of
Section 17.24.020.D of the City's Development Code will not have an impact to the environment
in the following areas: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems,
Water, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Energy .and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise,
Utilities and Service Systems, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation.
The proposed Amendments will result in a less than significant impact to
Transportation/Circulation. It will decrease the hazard and barrier for pedestrians and bicyclists
by removing RV's and other large-scale items from encroaching into the public right-of-way
which restricts their visibility.
In addition, the proposed Amendments will result in a less than significant impact to Public
Services (other governmental services). It has been determined that increased enforcement of
Development Code provisions regulating on-site storage of vehicles would require additional staff
resources. As stated above, enforcement of the Code was primarily driven by complaints received
from residents. According to Code Enforcement staff, enforcement of this item required
approximately 30-40% of their staff hours and would require the same if they were to pro-actively
enforce the Ordinance. In order to enforce these regulations effectively, one-half of a Code
Enforcement staff person would be required at the current time. The cost to the City (in 1998
dollars) would be $27,259.00 annually. This figure would likely be higher in future years.
No mitigation measures are required.
R:\STAFFRPTL349PA97.CC1 8/4/98 mf ~ 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
JULY 1, 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Comr~i~o~,/
Debbie Ubnosl(~'?Planning Manager
DATE:
July 1, 1998
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Sections of the City's
Development Code Pertaining to On-Site Storage of Vehicles (including
Recreational Vehicles) in Residential Zones
Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending approval of PA97-
0349 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff
Report.
BACKGROUND
The following background has been included for the benefit of the two newly appointed
Planning Commissioners. All previous Staff Reports (including correspondence received) and
minutes of those meetings regarding this matter have been included as attachments to this
Report.
At their September 23, 1997 meeting, the Council directed staff to amend the Development
Code to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) pertaining primarily to recreational vehicles. The
Council's discussion focused on the appropriateness and need for the City to enforce a
regulation that is generally incorporated into Home Owner's Association CC'&R's In the end,
the Council decided that the City should not assume any responsibility for enforcement of Home
Owner's Association CC&R's.
Since deletion of this Section of the Development Code would require an Ordinance
Amendment, this item was placed on the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission agenda for
Commission action. However, upon further consideration, the Council directed staff to conduct
additional research on this matter. At the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission meeting,
staff requested this item be continued to the December 1, 1997 Planning Commission hearing.
Staff then requested this issue be continued off calendar at the December 1, 1997 meeting
until the research was conducted.
Staff placed this item on the Commission Business section of the February 2, 1998 Planning
Commission meeting and requested that the Commission provide direction to staff regarding
three potential options for recreational vehicle storage in residential zones. After reviewing the
R:~STAFFRPTO49PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf 1
options and receiving public testimony from seventeen residents, the Commission unanimously
(4-0, Commissioner Soltysiak was absent) recommended to the City Council that the existing
Development Code provisions remain in effect and be enforced with the existing penalties.
They also recommended that additional staff resources required for effective enforcement be
considered by the Council. Of the seventeen residents who spoke at the Commission hearing,
sixteen were in favor of enforcing the existing provisions of the Development Code.
This item was tentatively scheduled for the March 17, 1998 City Council meeting; however,
staff was directed to remove this item from that meeting's agenda and not bring it before the
Council until after a joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop could be held to discuss
the item.
A joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop was held on April 21, 1998. The Planning
Commission was directed by the City Council to consider the information and direction provided
to them at that meeting and provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding an
Ordinance regulating the on-site storage of vehicles in residential zones. Staff reviewed the
comments and suggestions from that meeting and provided issues and options for the
Commission at their meeting of May 6, 1998. The Commission reviewed the issues which were
accompanied by potential options and received testimony from sixteen (16) residents at that
meeting. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Commission continued this item to their June
3, 1998 hearing and directed staff to bring back a draft Ordinance.
A draft ordinance was prepared; however, the Commission directed staff to further refine the
language and continued the item to their July 1, 1998 meeting.
ANALYSIS
Staff has clarified the following issues based upon the direction provided by the Planning
Commission: definition of vehicle, types of vehicles which need to be stored on the side or rear
yard, temporary parking of vehicles in front yards, definition of "actual yard," storage/parking
of automobiles and motorcycles in front yards, paving materials required~ difference between
camper shell and pick-up shell, other clean-up items and creation of a grace period. Staff
reviewed the previous revisions made to Section 17.24.040.D. of the Development Code and
has provided a revised copy. Staff modified the first draft ordinance when preparing the
current draft. Draft No. I additions are identified as redlined text with deletions appearing as
strike outs. Draft No. 2 modifications appear as redlined, italicized text. The comprehensive
draft has been included as Attachment No. 1 to this Report.
Definition of Vehicle
Automobiles, motorcycles, mopeds and "similar items" has been added back into the definition
of vehicle. At the request of the Commission, recreational vehicle was also added to the list
and house cars were deleted from the list. Section 17.24.040.D.1 has been expanded to
include the definitions of both parking and standing (originally recommended to be located in
Section 17.24.020.D. 1 .d).
Vehicles Which Need to Be Parked or Stored on the Side or Rear Yard
Section 17.24.040.D.1.d has been expanded to include language clarifying the types of
vehicles which need to be parked or stored on the side or rear yard of a parcel. This list
R.:~STAFFRPT~349PA37.PC4 6/24/98 mf ')
includes: recreational vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health
and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or
other large portable recreational and commercial equipment and other non-motorized vehicles,
regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle. Automobiles (including
pick-up trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles), motorcycles and mopeds are not included in this
list. This Section further states that these types of vehicles may be parked or stored only in
the side or rear yard; provided, that such area is screened from view from the street, public
right-of-way and adjacent properties by a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least
five feet in height.
Temporary Parking of Vehicles in Front Yards
Section 17.24.040.D. 1 .f has been revised to read: "Except as provided ~ herein, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code,
trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable
recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or
width that are detached from a motor vehicle temporarily parked within public view within the
Actual Front Yard, unscreened corner side yard or unscreened side yard abutting a street may
be parked or left standing for periods of time not to exceed two (2) consecutive days for
loading and unloading the vehicle. No vehicle parking or storage shall be allowed in the Actual
Front Yard." This clarifies which vehicles are allowed to be temporarily parked in the actual.
front yard, the duration of time they are allowed to be temporarily parked and prohibits
permanent parking in the actual front yard.
Definitions of Actual Yards
Definitions of actual yards (front, side and rear) have been developed for inclusion into Section
17.34 (Definitions) of the Development Code. These definitions have been included as
Attachment No. 2 to this Staff Report. An exhibit has also been created which depicts the
actual yards. This will clarify the language contained in the definitions.
Paving
The type of paving required for parking of vehicles on the side or rear of the parcel was
discussed by the Commission; however, staff did not have a definitive recommendation for the
specific requirement. Based upon staff's analysis of this matter, staff recommends that the
following language be added to Section 17.24.040.D.l.c: "..shall be paved with an
impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the weight of the vehicle." This will
adequately address staff's concerns regarding the nature of the parking surface for those types
of vehicles which are parked/stored permanently on the side or rear yard of the parcel.
Camper Shells and Pick-Up SheEs
The Commission discussed differences between camper shells and pick-up shells. Camper
shells, which are typically used for temporary habitable space, are regulated by this Section of
the Development Code. Pick-up shells which are typically attached to a pick-up truck for
purposes of providing all-weather protection to the contents of the pick-up truck, are not
regulated by this Section. It is the intent of the Ordinance to regulate pick-up shells which are
detached from the vehicle under the definition of those items which are detached from the
vehicle, but require screening.
R:~TAF'FR.PT~49PA97.PC4 6/24~8 mf ~
Minor Repairs
The Commission requested clarification as to the definition of "minor repairs" which was
included in Section 17.24.04.D.1.f of the Development Code. Staff recommends that this
language be deleted from this Section since repair of vehicles is covered under Section
17.24.04.D.3.c of the Development Code.
Other Clean up Items
Staff has cleaned up several unclear items, including typographical errors contained in this
section. In addition, staff recommends that Section 17.24.040.D.1.h be deleted. This is
recommended because private, non commercial vehicles are covered under the definition of
vehicle, and the discussion of other items (i.e., trailers, semitrailer and others ) are also
previously covered in this Section.
Grace Period
The Commission discussed allowing a six month grace period, from the time the Development
Code Amendments are adopted by the City Council to allow for people to come into compliance
with the new regulations. Staff has included this language in the proposed draft City Council
Ordinance (reference Attachment No.1 Exhibit A).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff will be conducting the appropriate environmental review based upon the recommendation
from the Planning Commission to the City Council. This will accompany the City Council Staff
Report and will be subject to the noticing requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
FINDINGS
Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration
of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such General
Plan as may be in effect in any such city.
There is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and
welfare
The proposed Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
ordinances.
R:~TAFFRPTLM9PA97.PC4 6/24/98 m_f 4
Attachments:
5.
6.
7.
o
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Revisions to Section 17.24.020.D. - Blue Page 6
New Definitions for Section 17.34 - Blue Page 12
Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 14
Exhibit A. Draft Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 17
Correspondence Received - Blue Page 23
Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 3, 1997 - Blue Page 24
Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 2, 1998 - Blue Page 25
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 21, 1998 -
Blue Page 26
Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 6, 1998 - Blue Page 27
Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 3, 1998 - Blue Page 28
Planning Commission Minutes dated November 3, 1997 - Blue Page 29
Planning Commission Minutes dated February 2, 1998 - Blue Page 30
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes dated April 21, 1998 - Blue Page 31
Planning Commission Minutes dated May 6, 1998 - Blue Page 32
Planning Commission Minutes dated June 3, 1998 - Blue Page 33
R:~TAFFRPT~349PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
A PORTION OF SECTION 17.24.020.D.
OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE
DRAFT REVISIONS NO. 2
R:~STAFFRFIX~9PAg?.PC4 ~/24/~ nt[ ~
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
17.24.040.D PARKING REQUIREMENTS - DRAFT NO. 2
Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
Parking---Residential Uses. The paridng of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the follc~4ag provisions !istod below. "Vehicles" as used in ~ subsection
DI rdmH include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, as
including thase defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code,
trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, house ¢~s, campers, camper shells, boats
or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, nmt other non-
motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor
vehicle, automobiles, motorcycles, mopeds and any rimilar item. Parking shall be
defined as the .vtanding of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than
temporarib'for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading
merctgmdise or passengers as described below (d). Storage shall be defined to mean
to place or leave in a location for laler use.
The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required
or authorized off-street paved parking area.
All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall bc paved v~ ith a p¢~ maneat pa~ ing a~atccial be paved
with an intpermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the weight of
the vehicle. Such area shall be maintained in a usable condition free of
potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust, without
accumulation of loose material or other deterioration.
Ercept as provided for m Section F beio,; commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles ~ts including those defined in Section 18010 of the Catiforma Health
and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, hoa~
campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreatiotgtl and
commercial equipment, and other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of
length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle Vehic~s may be
parked or stored :'5:~.~ in the side or rear yard; provided, that such area is
screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent
properties by a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet
in height. Parking shall bc defined as the standing of a vehicle, w~athcr
oco,pL-d or sot, oth~., ~ise than te.,v. oradty for the p.,~os~ of a,,d
actually a~gaged hi loading or tu',loading merchaadise or passengers. S~oragc
shall be &flaed to ,.¢~1~ to pla~ or leave in a location for later use.
R:~TAF'FRP'~49PA97.PC4 6/'24/9g mf 7
f.
Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shah be limited to five percent
of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
Except as provided in herein, vehicles recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks'.
trailer~ motor trucks, semi-trailers, aan~rs. camper shells, boats or other
large portable recreationa~ and commercial eq~tipment, other non-motorized
vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached.from a motor
'vehicle temporarily parked within public view in requin,~ or autho, lzed
}~arking ~r. as within the "~'"':" ":~?i~/'.:~!!}Front Yard, '""'"'"--:':':"" :*~:m~ :'~':':':~i~ comer side yard or
............................... ~~utas~ '~ side yard abutting a street stm}! i!'~'~:~ be parked or left standing for
tempora, y periods of time not to exceed fiv~ '":~67~!:(:!2i) consecutive days
loading and unloading ~..el },,oekth~ ~,.~aor s~, ~iex the vehicle. No pc, manent
vehicle parking or storage shall be allow~ in the Actual Front Yard.
"Vehicles" as used in this section shall include, but .o't bc limited to,
conm~ercial vehicles, aut~nobil¢s, u acks, trailers, motor tracks, semi-trailers,
motor¢.,,¢les, mopeds, campers, camper shells, boats or other large pc,, table
reereaticmal and ccnnmcreial equitnaent.
No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, or ¢xo:eds a width of eighty inches~i or ex'~ds ~i~i!iheight of seven feet or
exceeds a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked on any portion of a
residential lot unless:
It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
i18. iii.
:t[~iiT~i!iin connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a
service to, or on, the property where the vehicle is parked,
while actively involved in such activity; or
I~!!it!i~ in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid
home occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of
the development code.
No pd~¢atc, nonccnma~rcial vehicle Milch exceeds a gcr, ss weight of
cm¢ and m~h~, ~ ~xce~s a width ~ eighty inches, or exceeds
a l~t ~sevcn feet or exc~s a length of twenty-five feet; and no
traikr, senfitrailer, boat or po, table recreational equi~nent shall be
p~k~ or sto~ ed within the fi o,~ yaM, coh,e~ side yam or side yard
abutting a st~et unless:
It is not a commercial vehicle and is parked for a tempora, y
period of time not to exceed t,vcnty-four hours;
It is involved in loading or unloadhg a,.tlvity; and
R:~TAFFRPTk349PA97.PC4 6/24/'98 mf 8
It is parked in complianec with any other avplicabte city
c~rdilm~c¢.
Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas shall
be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by guests.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
infraction.
In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off'-street parking
space shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem
parking shall be permitted. Guest parking shall not be permitted in required
setback areas.
A maximum of'l-or 2 commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles ets including
those defined m Section t 8010 of the California Health and Safety Code,
trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers. house cat a. campers, camper
shells, boatv or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment.
trod other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are
detached from a motor vehicle x-eh}cles may be parked or stored on the side
or rear yard of ~m a parcel of land at any one time.
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of .5 acres or more
unless part of a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use
permit.
All storage activities shall be scree *~!~:d from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled
parts are not permitted.
Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under Repair.
The following provisions shall apply to any commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles et~ including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and
Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, hou~ c'~t & campers,
camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment,
tamar other non-motorized vehicles, regardle~' of length or width that are detached
from a motor vehicle, motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, camper, camper trailer,
uailcr, uimiounted etariper, t~ailer coach, motorcycle, boat or similar conveytrace in
all residential districts, and to all sites in any other district used for residential
occupancy:
RSSTAFFRPTO49PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf 9
Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be
prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an
area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located
fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof,
which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an
essential or legally required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited
unless conducted with a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened
from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall
or equivalent screening.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and (b) of this
section, emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of
any of the above conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot,
may be conducted for an aggregate period of up to twenty-four hours in any
continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of the screening
requirements.
For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shall have
the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of California,
where such definitions are available.
Parking--Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
located:
On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the lot
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
On a lot or parcel of land separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or less)
from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
I. The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
ii.
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
and
IlL
The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or
parcels would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
it is intended to serve.
R:~gTAFFRPTO49PA97.PC4 6/'24~9S mf 10
d. Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor area.
On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same
ownership. Same ownership includes property that is subject to a binding
recorded lease for not less than ten years from commencement of use. The
parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to, any other
property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property
requiring the parking.
Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or parcel
of land as the use served.
R:~STAFleRFP~9PA.97.PC4 6/'24/98 mf ] 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NEW DEFINITIONS FOR SECTION 17.34
OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE
R:'~-'TAFFRPTk~9PA97.PC4 6/24~ mf 12
Yard, Actual Front:
Yard, Actual Rear:
Yard, Actual Side:
Section 17.34 - Definitions
The space extending across the full width of the front of the lot, the depth of
which is the minimum horizontal distance between the front lot line or street
right-of-way line and the primary structure on the lot.
The space extending across the full width of the rear of the lot, the depth of
which is the minimum horizontal distance between the rear lot line and the
primary structure on the lot.
The space between the setback line of the main building and the side lot line,
extending from the front yard to the rear yard; the measured distance of the
yard shall represent the shortest distance between the side lot line and that
portion of the main building nearest the line from which the measurement is
taken.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A REROLUTION OF THE CITY OF TI~,~ECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0349, AIrrENDING
SECTIONS OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
~EAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
Wltl~EA~, on January 2:5, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the City has iiientified a need to amend the Development Code;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County
Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and,
~, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0349,
on June 3, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition
to this matter;
~, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA97-0349,
on June 3, 1998 to the meeting on July 1, 1998;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0349,
on July 1, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to
this matter;
WHERFAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval Planning Application No. PA97-0349;
R:~TAFFRF1X349PA.97.PC4 6/24/98 mf 15
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO
THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of July,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~STAFFR.PT~349PA97.PC4 6/24/98 raf 16
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 98-
R:~STAFFP. PT~49PA97.PC4 6/24/~ mf 17
EXItlB~ A
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALWORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS OF
~ TEMECULA DEVELO~ CODE PERTAINING TO
ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.24.020.D. 1 through 17.24.020.D.6 of the Development Code
is amended to read as follows:
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
1. ParkingtResidential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the provisions listed below. "Vehicles" as used in subsection D1 shall include, but not be
limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, including those defined in Section 18010 of the
California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper
shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motorized
vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle, automobiles,
motorcycles, mopeds and any similar item. Parking shall be defined as the standing of a vehicle,
whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while actually engaged
in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers as described below (d). Storage shall be defined
to mean to place or leave in a location for later use.
a. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
RSSTAFFRP'I~49PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf ] 8
b. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required
or authorized off-street paved parking area.
c. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall be paved with an impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the
weight of the vehicle. Such area shall be maintained in a usable condition free of potholes and broken
sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust, without accumulation of loose material or other
deterioration..
d. Except as provided for in Section F below, commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks,
trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational
and commercial equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are
detached from a motor vehicle may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard; provided, that such
area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by a fence,
wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height.
e. Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five percent
of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
f. Except as provided Herein, recreational vehicles including those defined in
Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers,
campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other
non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle
temporarily parked within public view within the Actual Front Yard, unscreened comer side yard or
unscreened side yard abutting a street may be parked or left standing for periods of time not to exceed
two (2) consecutive days for loading and unloading the vehicle. No vehicle parking or storage shall
be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
g. No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, a width of eighty inches, a height of seven feet or a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked
on any portion of a residential lot unless:
I. It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
ii. It is in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to,
or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved in such activity; or
iii. It is in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid home
occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of the development code.
h. Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas shall
be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by guests.
infraction.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
R:~TAFFRPTx349PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf ] 9
J. In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off-stree~ parking space
shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem parking shall be permitted.
Guest parking shall not be permitted in required setback areas.
k. A maximum of 2 commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks,
semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a
motor vehicle may be parked or stored on the side or rear yard of a parcel of land at any one time.
2. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of.5 acres or more unless part of
a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use permit.
a. All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
b. Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are not permitted.
3. Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under Repair.
The following provisions shall apply to any commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks,
semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a
motor vehicle, in all residential districts, and to all sites in any other district used for residential
occupancy:
a. Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless conducted
within a garage or accessory building or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining
lots by a legally located fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
b. Storing placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof,
which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an essential or legally required
operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory building,
or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall or
equivalent screening.
c. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and (b) of this section,
emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of any of the above conveyances
when owned by a person residing on the lot, may be conducted for an aggregate period of up to
twenty-four hours in any continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of the screening
requirements.
R:~TAFF'RPTO49PA97.PC4 6/240S mf 20
d. For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shall have
the same meanings as defined' in the Vehicle Code of the state of California, where such definitions
are available.
located:
Parking--Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
supporting the use the
from the lot or parcel
and
On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the lot
parking facilities serve; or
On a lot or parcel of land separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or less)
supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
I. The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
ii. The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
iii. The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or parcels
would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
it is intended to serve.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
d. Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor area.
e. On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities sewe; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same ownership. Same
ownership includes property that is subject to a binding recorded lease for not less than ten years from
commencement of use. The parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to, any other
property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property requiring the parking.
6. Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or parcel
of land as the use served.
Section 3. Section 17.34. of the Development Code is amended to include the following
definitions: "Yard, Actual Front: The space extending across the full width of the front of the lot,
the depth of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the front lot line or street right-of-way
line and the primary structure on the lot." "Yard, Actual Rear: The space extending across the full
width of the rear of the lot, the depth of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the rear
lot line and the primary structure on the lot." "Yard, Actual Side: The space between the setback line
of the main building and the side lot line, extending from the front yard to the rear yard; the measured
distance of the yard shall represent the shortest distance between the side lot line and that portion of
the main building nearest the line from which the measurement is taken."
R:~STAFFRlYF~49PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf 21
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Fffective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect six (6)
months a~er its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance
shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 1 $ days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and
post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of
,199__.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certi~
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of ,199__, and that thereai~er,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk
R:~STAH:RFro49PA97.PC4 6r24/9S mf 22
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
R:~TAFFR.,vrk:M~PAF'/,PC4 ~24/~ ad' 23
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
R:~STAFFRPT'O49PAg'/.PC4 ~/2d./~S mf 24
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission'
Debbie Ubnoske; Planning Manager
DATE:
November 3, 1997
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Section 17.24.020(I2))(1)(f)
of the City's Development Code Pertaining to Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage
in Residential Areas
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMM!r~NDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for PA97-0349;
AI~OPT Resolution No. 97- recommending that the City
Council approve an Ordinance Repealing Section
17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the Temecula Development Code
pertaining to Recreational Vehicle (RV) storage in
residential areas based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
BACKGROUND
At the August 12, 1997 City Councfi meeting, Mayor Birdsall requested that staff prepare a report
discussing recreational vehicle (RV) storage in residential districts. This report was presented to
the City Council at their September 23, 1997 meeting. The issues discussed by the Council
centered on those issues which were previously discussed by the Planning Commission at their
January 27, 1997 meeting. Those Sections of the Code that were discussed related to City
restrictions on parking vehicles in front yards. The specific Code references are as follows:
Section 17.24.020(13)(1)(0 states: "Except as provided herein, vehicles parked
within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard,
comer side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for
temporary periods of time not to exceed five (5) consecutive days."
R:LVr~9PA~7.PCl 10/20/97 mf 1
Section 17.24.050(1) states: "In a residential zone, no portion of the required front
yard areas shall be developed or used for vehicular off-street parking other than
that portion occupied by the driveway. The curb cut for the driveway shall not
exceed twenty four (24) feet in width. This restriction shall apply to automobiles,
trucks, buses, trailers, boats, recreational vehicles, and motorcycles.'
DISCUSSION
At their September 23, 1997 meeting, the Council directed staff to amend the Development Code
to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f). Most of the Council's discussion focused on the
appropriateness and need for the City to enforce a regulation that is generally incorporated into
Home Owner's Association CC&R's In the end, the Council decided that the City should not
assume any responsibility for enforcement of Home Owner's Association CC&R's type of
regulation. However, the Council felt that Section 17.24.050(I) should be retained to prevent
residents from storing vehicles on landscaped areas. As a result, Staff has brought forward the
proposed Ordinance to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the Development Code.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 3
A. Ordinance No. 97- - Blue Page 6
Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 9
City Council Staff Report (September 23, 1997) - Blue Page 18
City Council Minutes (September 23, 1997) - Blue Page 19
R:~'T~9PA97.PCl 10/20/97 mf 2
AITA~NT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
It:~STAFFRIrI'~49PA97.PCI 10/20/97 mf ~
ATI~ACHlV~NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING- COMMISSION OF
T!qE C1TY OF TEMECULA RECOMMI~NDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ REPEALING
SECTION 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) OF THE TEMECULA
DEVI~O~ CODE PERTAINING TO RECREATIONAL
VEI~ICLE 0iV) STORAGE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
WI-II~£AS, on January 25, 1997, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Development Code;
WItEREAS, the City has 'ffientified a need to amend the Development Code;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County
Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 3, 1997, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMI~qSION FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
AN ORDINANCE ENTIT!'.~I~: 'AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) OF
THE CITY'S DEVELOPIVrENT CODE PERTAINING TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
(RV) STORAGE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS' THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM'
A~rACHED TO T!tI~q RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
R:~T~gPA97.PCI 10/'20/~ mf 4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of November, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temeeula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of
November, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~rAFFRPTL~49PA97.PC1 10/20/97 m~ ~
E~XH reit A
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
R:~TAFPRPl'~9PA97.1~I 10/20/97 m~ (~
EXIHR~ A
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION
17.24.020(D)(1)(f) OF THE ClTY'S DEVF_.LOPMF~NT CODE
PERTAINING TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV)
STORAGE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEM~2ULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
Ce
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State hw and local
Section 2. Section 17.24.020(1))(1)(0 of the Development Code is hereby repealed.
Section 3. SeverabiliW. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
00) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The
City CIerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption
of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish
a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:kVrAFFRPTk349PA~7.PC1 10/20/9~ mf 7
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTI~ this
199 .
day of ,
Patricia Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 199__, and thai
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILlVIEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~$TA~9PA97.PCI 10/20/97 mf 8
ATrACHMEN-T NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRO~AL STUDY
R:~ST~9PA97.P~l 10/20/97 m~ ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Planning Application No. PA97-0349
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
T~ae~ula, CA 92590
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400
City-wide in the residential districts
Same as No. 2.
Multiple residential designations
Multiple residential designations
Amendment to Chapter 17.24 of tl~ City's Development
Code, appealing Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) which reads:
"Except as provided herein, vehicles parked within public
view in required or authorized parking areas within the
front yard, corner side yard or side yard abutting a street
shall be parked or lef~ standing for temporary periods of
time not to exceed five consecutive days."
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: N/A
Other public agencies whose approval
is requii~xl: None.
R:~STAPPRF~gPA97.PCl 10~20B)7 mf 10
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checlc~ below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
impact that is a "Potentially Si?ificant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
[ ] C~ologic Problems [ ] Pubhc Services
[ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] MandaWry Findings of Significance
IX] None
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation, I fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on th
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Date
ISSUES A.~D SUPPORTING INI~TION $OL~.I2ES
1. ~ USE ~ P~G. WoMd ~e
a. Co~ct ~ g~ p~ ~on ~
b. C~a ~ ~phc~le m~~ pl~ ~ ~h~i~
~ by a~i~ ~ j~c~ ov= ~ pwj~
c. Be ~mp~blc ~ e~g 1~ ~ ~
d. ~t a~c~ ~ ~ o~ (e.t.
~ or ~, or ~p~ ~ ~p~ble l~ ~)?
e. Di~t ~ ~ ~e ph~ ~~t
~W (raciSt 1ow-~e or minod~
2. POP~ON ~ HOUS~G. Wo~d be
a.Cm~afively ex~ o~ci~ rc~on~ ~
p~j~?
m~fiy (e.t. ~ proj~t ~ m ~el~ ~a
~ ~ion ~ maj~ ~~)?
c. Di~l~ ~ borg, ~i~ ~o~le ho~?
3. GEO~GIC PRO~MS. Would the p~po~
a. Fa~t ~?
b. S~c ~
c. Sci~c ~o~d f~, ~cl~ liq~?
d. Sci~e, ~, or vol~c ~d?
e. L~li~ ~ m~o~?
~o~ cb~g~ m ~by or ~ble
f~ ~av~ ~ ~ ~?
~. Subsi~ of~ lind?
h. S~ive
I. U~q~ ~lo~ or phy~c~ fea~?
WA~ Would the p~pm~ ~u~ ~=
ra~ ~d mo~t of ~ ~o~
[]
[1
[1
[]
[3
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[3
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[3
[3
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
No
[~
IX3
ISSUES AND $UPI'OR'ITNO II~ORMATION $OURCI~S
b. Exposure of people or property to water rdat~d hazards
such as flooding?
c. Discharge m~o surface waters or other alteration of sudace
wa~r quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of maYace water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through inteix~tion
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or garough substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
AIR qUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or conUibute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the propossl r~suit
a. Ina'ease vehicle trips or Iraflit congestion?
b. Hazards to safetyfrom design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous totersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
¢. Hazards or bamers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[3
[]
[]
[3
[]
[]
[]
[3
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[3
[]
[3
[1
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[3
[]
[l
[1
[1
No
R:~STA~gPA~'7.PCl l~ { 13
~sstms A~U SCU'I'OaTmO m~oms~o~ sotmc~s
~ Co~ ~ ~op~ ~ci~ ~p~g ~five
~~ (e.g. b~ ~o~, bi~clc r~)?
g. R~, wa~ome ~ ~ ~c
7. ~1OLOOlC~ ~SO~CES. Would the
mu. h ~pa~ to:
(~lu~g but not iimi~ to pl~, fi~ ~,
~ b~)7
b. ~ly d~i~ ~i~ (e.g. h~mge
L~aHy desi~ n~ ~fi~ (e.g. o~ fo~
~ habimk
· Wefl~d habi~ (e.g. m~ ~pm~ ~d v~ ~I)7
e. WH~e ~ or ~afi~
8. E~R~Y ~ M~ ~SO~CES.
Would ~he propose:
a. C~ct ~ ~op~ m~ ~afion pl~?
b. U~ non-rmew~ ~ m a w~ ~d m~cimt
m~?
c. Re~i m ~ 1o~ of av~b~ of a ~o~ min~ r~
· at wo~d be of~e v~ ~o ~e m~on ~d ~e ~d~
of ~c State?
~~s. Would the pmpos~ ~voive:
a. A fi~ of ~i~ ~1osi~ or ~le~ ofh~
~~ (~l~g, but not 1~ to: od, p~ci~,
c~c~ or r~afi~)?
b. P~ible m~ ~ ~ ~g~ ~ pl~
c. ~e ~on of ~y h~ h~d ~ ~fi~ h~
h~7
d. E~o~ ofpmple to e~g ~ ofpo~fi~
h~?
e.~ f~ h~d ~ ~e~ ~ fl~able b~
~, or ~7
[1
[3
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[3
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
R:'~S'rA~}PAq7.PCI 10/20/9~ nf 14
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
10. NOISE. Would the proposal r~ult in:
L Increasc in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effeet
upou, or result in · ueed for uew or altered ~over~m~t
services in any of the following are~:
& Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
¢. Schools?
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including fonds?
e. Other governmental services?
12. UTILFI~S AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
o. ?ower or natural g~?
b. Communications systems?
¢. Local or regional water trea~nent or disUibution
Storm water drainage?
f. Solid w~te disposal?
Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTI[ETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vistn or scenic highway7
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Cre~tc li~t or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[3
[]
[3
[3
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
Ix]
[]
[]
No
R: ~TAFFRPT~49PA97 .PC ! 10/'20/97 mf 15
AND SUPPORTING INI~RMATION SOURC!~
b. Disturb amhazological resour, s?
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environmint, substantially reduce th~ habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, csuse a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or ~imal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or enchngered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of fi~ major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
llm/tcd, but cumulafivcly comidcrable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the meremental affects of a
project ~re considerable when viewed in conn~-Xion with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the affects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
· rectly or 'mdirectly~
17. EABLIF~R ANALYSES. None.
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
R: ~TAFFRIvr~9PAW. IN~I 10/20/97 mf 16
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRO~AL IMPACTS
Based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Environmental Study, repealing Section
17.24.020(D)(1)(0 of the City's Development Code will not have an impact to the environment
in the following areas: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems,
Water, Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral
Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Cultural Resources
and Recreation.
Staff determined there would be a less than significant impact to Aesthetics as a resuk of repealing
Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code. Potential impacts would be
mitigated by the Home Owner's Associations (HOA) in the event that any of the CC&R's
pertaining to this issue are violated. In areas where the Home Owner's Association is not active,
it is assumed that residents located in those areas with the knowledge that this type of enforcement
by the Home Owner's Association would not occur. No mitigation measures are required.
R:~STAFFRP'V~9PA97.PCI 10/20/97 mf 17
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 23, 1997
APPROVe,. ~
FINANCE OFFICER t.~....,
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council\City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
September 23, 1997
Recreational Vehicle Storage in Residential Districts
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Direction.
BACKGROUND
At the August 12, 1997 City Council meeting, Mayor Birdsall requested staff to prepare a staff
report discussing recreational vehicle storage in residential districts. Currently, Section
17.24.050(I) of the Development Code restricts the ability of residents to store recreational
vehicles in the front and street side yards in all residential districts. Since the implementation
of this provision of the Development Code, this has presented some problems due to the size
of the lots in most of the residential developments in the City not being large enough to allow
storage in areas other than the front or street side yards. As the City's Code Enforcement
Officers have attempted to enforce this provision of the Development Code, they have met with
resistance from property owners who have no where else to store their trailers, recreational
vehicles, and boats. However, the City is currently processing several applications for self
storage facilities. These are expected to provide additional storage opportunities.
The Sections of the Code that appear to be causing the most concern are as follows:
Section 17.24.020(f) states: "Except as provided in herein, vehicles parked
within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard,
corner side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for
temporary periods of time not to exceed five (5) consecutive days."
Section 17.24.050(I) states: "In a residential zone, no portion of the required
front yard areas shall be developed or used for vehicular off-street parking other
than that portion occupied by the driveway. The curb cut for the driveway shall
not exceed twenty four (24) feet in width. This restriction shall apply to
automobiles, trucks, buses, trailers, boats, recreational vehicles, and
motorc~/cles."
The City's Development Code requires at least one residential side yard to be at least 10 feet
wide. A 10 foot side yard setback is wide enough to allow vehicular access to the side and
rear of the property for vehicle storage. In contrast, the previous County land use ordinance
required only a five (5) foot minimum side yard.
R:~'TAFFR-!s~VE.t'tSTOR.CC 9/15/~7 kJb 1
It is staff's opinion that Sections 17.24.020(f) and 17.24.050 (I) may not be reasonable give~.
that so many of the City's residential areas have already been built with a narrow side yard on
both sides thereby making it difficult to store recreational vehicles in any place other than the
front of the residence. In addition, the Development Code contains no provisions for an
exception/appeal process should such a process be needed due to prior conditions created by
the County.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
R:~STAFFRPT',VEHSTOR.CC 911519'7 kib 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CITY COUNCIL ~
SEPTF.,M:BER 23, 1997
R:~STAFFRPTLM9PA97.PC1 10/20/97 mf 19
City Council Minutea
1997
25.
RecreationAl Vehicle ~torage in Residential ?ones
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall stated she feels the City should not assume additional responsibility for
Homeowners Association CC&R's.
Councilmember Stone asked if other cities have been contacted to see how they address
this issue.
Community Development Director Gary Thomhill stated the vast majority of cities do not
get into strong regulation of these issues.
City Manager Ron Bradley explained the basic underlying authority on this issue is the
California Vehicle Code whose provisions prevent long-term parking on public streets.
He stated there are cities who adopt more stringent codes.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to assume
no additional responsibility for enforcement of Home Owners Association CC&R's and
to direct Code Enforcement not to enforce Section 17.24.020(f) and Section
17.24.050(I).
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill, explained that the language on
17.24.050(I) was meant to address vehicles being parked on front lawn areas, and
suggested the motion be amended to come back with language that addresses this more
clearly.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts amended his motion, and Councilmember Ford amended his
second to also direct that the matter of enforcement for vehicles parked in front lawn
areas will continue to be vigorously pursued under the City zoning codes and applicable
government code sections, until such time as language can be clarified.
The motion carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining, stating he would like to have
more information before voting on this matter.
26. ~ity ~-ouncil Meeting Schedule - October. November and ~ecember 1997
Minute.~Og~23/07 - 11- 10/09/97
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 2, 1998
R:~TAFFRFI~4~PA~7~4 ~2~/95 ntf 25
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ORIGINAL
February 2, 1998
Storage of Recreational Vehicles In Residential Zones
Prepared by:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Department Staff Recommends the Planning
Commission:
Review the options presented by Staff, and direct Staff
regarding the storage of recreational vehicles in Residential
Districts
BACKGROUND
The City's Development Code was adopted on January 25, 1995 and included provisions for
the City to regulate on-site storage of recreational vehicles in residential zones. Prior to the
adoption of the Development Code, the enforcement was left to Homeowner's Associations
(HOA's) in areas where they existed in the City. In areas where there were no HOA's, no
regulations covered the on-site storage of recreational vehicles in residential zones. Since the
adoption of the Development Code, Code Enforcement staff have been enforcing this provision
of the Development Code based upon complaints from residents.
At the August 12, 1997 City Council meeting, Mayor Birdsall requested staff prepare a staff
report discussing the issue of recreational vehicle storage in residential districts. Staff brought
this report before the Council on September 23, 1997. At that meeting the City Council
directed staff to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code pertaining
to recreational vehicle storage in residential areas. This Section, which intends to allow
temporary on-site storage of recreational vehicles in residential zones states:
'Except as provided herein, vehicles parked within public view in required or
authorized parking areas within the front yard, corner side yard or side yard
abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for temporary periods of time
not to exceed five (5) consecutive days."
Since deletion of this Section of the Development Code would require an Ordinance
Amendment, this item was placed on the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission agenda.
-However, upon further consideration, the Council directed staff to conduct additional research
on this matter. Staff requested this item be continued at the November 3, 1997 Planning
R:~.~TAPPRPT'~R¥-RP..~.PCI 1/28/98 tn~ 1
Commission meeting to the December 1, 1997 Planning Commission hearing. Staff requeste~
this issue be continued off-calendar at the December 1, 1997 meeting. Since that time, staff
has conducted research on this issue. The result of this research is provided below.
ANALYSIS
Research Conducted
Staff contacted over one dozen municipalities to determine how they address the issue of on-
site storage of recreational vehicles in residential zones. It was determined from this research,
that there are many approaches to regulate the on-site storage of recreational vehicles in
residential zones. The options presented below are in response to the comments made by
residents and are based upon regulations of other Cities. Staff is open to any other options the
Commission may suggest.
Option No. I - Utilize Current Code Provisions: Prohibition
This option would be to direct staff to utilize the current provisions contained in the
Development Code to prohibit long-term parking/storage of recreational vehicles in front yards
of residential zones. Recommendations received in letters from residents include: increased
enforcement by the City and the inclusion of significant penalties for infractions.
Increased enforcement would require additional staff resources. As stated above, enforcement
of the Code was primarily driven by complaints received from residents. According to Codr
Enforcement staff, enforcement of this item required approximately 30-40% of their staff hour-<
and would require the same if they were to pro-actively enforce the Ordinance. In order to
effectively enforce these regulations, one-half of a Code Enforcement staff person would be
required at the current time. The cost to the City (in 1998 dollars) would be $27,259.00
annually. This figure would likely be higher in future years. It should be noted that, if an
additional staff member is not added, other areas of code enforcement will be impacted. In
addition, with the current residential growth in Temecula, at approximately 700 new homes per
year, the limited staff resources would be stretched even thinner.
Option No. 2 - Delete Section 17.24.020(D)(l)(f) of the City's Development Code: No
Regulation
This option would delete the current Development Code language, and result in the City not
regulating recreational vehicles on private property in residential zones. This option, which
would result in the same condition which existed before the adoption of the Development Code,
would place the burden for enforcement upon the individual HOA's, and would result in no
regulation in areas of the City where HOA's are inactive or do not exist. According to several
residents who have served on the Board of Directors for a HOA, enforcement is expensive, time
consuming and ineffective. Correspondence from several residents (see Attachment No. 1)
indicates that they are not in favor of this option, while one resident was in favor of this
method of regulation. At the request of the Council, staff contacted the City of Irvine and was
informed that they leave the enforcement of this regulation with the HOA's.
R:~TAFFRI~"~V-RP~.PCl 1F28/98 m~ ~
Option No. 3 - Modify Section 17.24.020 (D) of the Development Code: Prohibition with
Exemptions for Special Circumstances
Several cities {Palm Springs, Palm Desert and Poway) allow parking/storage of recreation
vehicles in a front yard, if it is not possible to store them in either the side or rear yard or a
separate garage. These cities allow a recreational vehicle to be parked in a front yard if the
area is paved. Palm Springs and Palm Desert require the owner to receive a permit to park the
recreational vehicle in the front yard area. To receive a permit, the Planning Department of
these cities provides written notice to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed location
of the recreational vehicle. Should a written objection be received or should the Planning
Department determine not to issue the permit, then the matter is referred to the Planning
Commission which holds a noticed public hearing with respect to the issuance of a permit.
This option would require additional staff time to process the applications. An application fee
would be assessed to the homeowner to offset staff time, materials and postage for the public
hearing. Code Enforcement staff also be required for violations. Given the current interest in
stronger regulations to prohibit the storage/parking of recreation vehicles on-site in driveways,
and the additional time requirements placed upon the current staff, this option does not appear
to achieve that objective.
On-Street Parking of Recreational Vehicles
One resident discussed prohibiting the storage of recreational vehicles on the street. On-street
parking is regulated by the State Vehicle Code and in enforced by the Police Department. The
code allows on-street parking as long as the vehicle is legally parked and is not left standing
longer than 72 hours. According to Code Enforcement staff, this regulation is directed more
towards inoperable vehicles and is easily and regularly avoided by those who move their
recreational vehicles within the time limits of the existing code provisions.
Correspondence Received
Since this item has appeared on the original City Council agenda, staff has received a number
of letters from residents regarding this issue. In addition, staff has received telephone calls and
talked to residents at the public information counter at City Hall. The letters have been
forwarded to the Commission or Council as they have been received. All but one letter were
in favor of maintaining the current regulations regarding the parking/storage of recreational in
residential zones. The letters have been included as Attachment No. I to this Staff Report.
Attachments:
1. Letters from Residents - Blue Page
R:~I'AFFRPT~V.RF~.PCI 1F28/98 mf 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS
R:~.qTAPFRPT~RV-RP.S.PCI 1/28/98 at/ 4
X. Bradley
G. Thornhill
October 24, 1997
Temecula City Council
OCT 2, 199
Dear Council:
We have lived in Temecula for eight years and are proud to say there is very little to
complain about. Our City Council listens and acts for all our behalf. In today's politics,
this is unusual and appreciated.
The issue of RV and boat parking in our residential areas is of concern to us for two
reasons: (1) If our City Council can elect to not enforce the Codes of Record what other
laws and codes can they elect to not enforce? (2) With the "announcement" that this
code will not be enforced. we have in effect given an open invitation for more of what is
already a blight on our neighborhoods. Many times the parking of RV's and boats on the
driveways necessitates excessive automobile parking in the streets or cul-de-sacs.
Policing is not a problem he the fine for infraction ls high enough and well published. A
$500.00 per day fine will clean up what is beginning to look like a resort parking lot
throughout our beautiful city.
Mr. Roberts and Ms. Birdseli must start looking around more and listen to the electorate.
This city is larger than just Meadowview!
We applaud the efforts of Mr. Swne and Mr. Lindennan who on aH issues have the pulse
of our entire community. Mr. Ford, you will do well to follow their examples. We urge
all of you to reconsider this issue and perform the job you were elected to do. Please obey
and eraCorce our laws; they are there for a good reason and it is not your job to excuse
them.
etty Jo Porter
40221 Tuolomne Court
909/699-6968
TEMECULA CITY MANAGER AND
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
Dear "~..~. /~~,
We thank the board members for hearing our plea on Monday
evening November 3rd, to stop permanent parking of RV'S
and boats on driveways, lawns and streets in residential
areas.
City Council members Mr. Stone, Lindermans and Roberts were
not aware of the seriousness of this problem until they
came to our neighborhoods. In fairness to yourself and us
homeowner taxpayers, I urge you to give just 30 minutes of
your time and persoally come out and see what has happened
to this beautiful city. I recommend you drive the following
streets; Calle Medusa, Chaunce~ Way, Yardley Ct., Wellington
Circle and the worst of all Windsor Road.
The answer to this problem is not Home Owners Associations.
Its evident that HOA can not enforce this unless the city
invokes and enforces an ordinance to prohibit this sort of
thing --- and please realize that about one third of the
developments in our city do not have HOA,S. The California
vehicle code governing residential street parking is not
working. Also, n/ether is development code chapter 17.24
and chapter 10.32. They will never work until rewritten.
The penalty must be stronger than "Violation of any
provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
infraction". We suggest it read "Violation of any provision
of this subsection shall be given a three day notice to
correct the infraction or be fined $100.00 per day until
corrected. After the third day the owner will be cited and
fined at rate of $100.00 per day until the infraction is
corrected. The vehicle, trailer, RV, boat etc may be
impounded at the cities descretion and the fine shall
continue until claimed and fine is paid."
It should be published in all local newspapers that this
ordinance would become effective in 30 days..
Please help us keep this city beautiful.
Edward V. and Evelyn D. Salitore
42733 San Julian Place
Temecula, Ca 92592
December 1, 1997
Honorable Councilman,~arel Lindermans
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, Ca 92589-9033
cc: Gary Thornhill
RE: CITY OF TEMECULA PARKING REGULATIONS OF MOTOR HOMES,TRAILERS
BOATS
Dear Councilman Lindermans:
We purchased our Lake Village home in 1973,the year Lake Village was founded.
In those early days beforethe Incorporation,Lake Village was a quiet,laid-back,
slow-moving off the beaten path community. The ideal'setting that my wife Evelyn
and myself were looking for upon our retirement from the exciting and fast moving
life-style demanded by our ownership and administrative involvement in News-
paper and Text book publishing business in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Upon our retirement in 1978, we made the BIG MOVE to our small Rancho Calif.
(Lake Village) retirement home,worlds away we thought then,from the hectic,
never ending "Rat Race" of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
During most of our almost 20 years of living here in Lake Village, we have owned
and parked our Motor Home in our driveway, without problems.
We heartily disagree with the JOHNNY COME LATELY DISGRUNTLED DISSIDENTS,that our
Motor Home is a blight and eyesore to our neighborhood.
However,we would gladly park it behind our fence it it were possible to do so.
unfortunately our lot is situated in such a way that it is impossible to park it
behind our fence.
We have a large investment in our Motor Home which is kept in excellent condition
at all times and is considered as one of our most cherished possessions. It is
furnished,packed and "ready to go" on short notice, which we take advantage of
quite often for weeks and months at a time.
Any thought of driving it to a storage lot, even if one were close by, between
trips and subjecting our Motor Home to burglaries, and vandalism is entirely out
of the question.
-more-
Temecula City Councilman
-2-
Ed & Erie Salitore
IN CONCLUSION --FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
1)Motor Homes,trailers,boats, and recreational vehicles should be allowed to
be parked on driveways, when it is not feasible or possible to park them
behind the fenced or screened area of such property.
2) Most owners of Recreational vehicles are honest,law-abiding ,tax paying
civic minded citizens and a credit to our Community.
3) JOHNNY COME LATELY DISSIDENTS should not be encouraged in their unjust and
unwarranted self serving demands against all owners of Recreational Vehicles.
They knew what the conditions were relative to the policy of the City of
Temecula ,on Recreational Vehicles at the time they made the decision to move
here.
4) Where flagrant abuse of reasonable regulations exist, the parties responsible
for the abuse should be held responsible.
In closing we are really happy to let you know we Voted for you and have been
strong supporters of the actions and efforts of our City Council,including,and
ever since Incorporation.
Thanking you in advance for your kind indulgence, and it is our fervent hope that
you and all your loved ones are blessed with a Happy, Healthy,and better than eve
coming Holiday Season and New Year.
Sincerely,
Ed and Erie Salitore
42733 San Julian Pl.(Lake Village)
Temecula, Ca 92592
Phone: (909) 676-6355
ENCL:
cc:
Photograph enclosed showing our Motor Rome as it is,parked in
our driveway.
Council Members
Birdsall
Cormerchero
Ford
~Lindemans
R6berts
Stone
Planning Comm.
Fahey
4 November 1997
Whom It May Concern
City of Temecula
NOV 1 0 1997'
Re: Attached Letter
We request that copies of the enclosed letter be provided to each member of
the City Council and P!snning Commission before their next meetings on this
subject.
Sincere~
4 November 1997
Temecula City Coundl and
Temecula Planning Commission
43200 Business Park Drive
Temec,,i~, CA 92390
Re: Repeal of Section 17.24(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code Pertaining
to Recreational Vehicle Storage in Residential Areas
At a 3 November meeting of the Temecula Planning Commission the
referenced agenda item was withdrawn from consideration pending further
study of the issue. However, before moving on to the next agenda item, the
Planning Commission provided opportunity for the public to voice concerns
about the proposed repeal.
We would like to comment, in greater detail than the three minute Commission
Limit allows, on two issues raised during the public responses.
Enforcement: Three comments here. First: Cornm~ssioner Guerriero
asked about numbers of personnel needed to enforce the code. Why has the
code not been forcefully enforced to date? Had it been enforced with vigor the
number of personnel needed at this time would not be significant. Residents
would have been made aware of the inconveniences involved in violating the
code. Initial vigorous enforcement activities at this time might require
additional personnel to be used, but a lower level would ul~m~tely be required.
The code enforcement must include significant penalties. Some people have to
be hit over the head with a 2 x 4 to get their attention.
Second: One speaker from a Homeowner's Association noted that asking the
HOAs to enforce parking regulations pits neighbor against neighbor, leading to
neighborhood feuds and hatred. He suggested that the City is the better
regulatory agency. Comment: Our experience in 3 HOAs over the last 16
years is that the speaker is right. Asking the HOAS to enforce parking
regulations on city owned streets can lead to feuds, anger, and, in extreme
cases -- violence. The city owns the streets. The city has an enforceable code
on the books. The city should enforce it. Without that enforcement the HOAs
are forced into long, expensive, and sometimes losing legal battles with people
who have little regard for their neighbors, their neighborhood, or property
values. "Curb appeal" is a significant factor in home re-sale. A cluttered
neighborhood reduces curb appeal.
Third. Other cities can and do enforce the same or similar parking regulations.
Temecula can either help maintain the beauty of its neighborhoods or remove
the code and contribute to their deterioration.
RV. Ro~t~. E~. ~qtor~e: We note that an agenda report concerning
this item states that the City's Code Enforcement Officers °'hape met with
resistance from property owners who have no where else to store their trailers,
RVs, and boats. However, the City is currently processing several applications
for self storage facilities. These are expected to provide additional storage
opportunities." Comment: Are the majority of City residents to be penalized
because some residents will not accept their responsibilities as citizens of
Temecula and (where they live in HOAs) members of HOAs? Ignorance of the
law has never been a legal defense. People with RVs, trailers, boats, tanks,
giant earth movers, tar roofing trucks, elephants, and Siberian Yaks have a
responsibility that we all share - to conform to all established laws, codes,
rules and regulations-- whether they like them or not.
We appreciate your consideration of these items as you move to
reconsideration of this issue. We urge retention of the code -- and its vigorous
enforcement.
Sincerely,
3223~7 Placer ~elair
Temecula, CA 92592
693-0929
cc: The Califorman
November 17, 1997
TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION:
This is one more concerned citizen's appeal to
PLEASE, PLEASE retain and enforce the City's Develop-
ment Code pertaining to recreational vehicle storage
in residential areas, and illegal parking on City streets.
Please help the majority of the citizens,who love
Temecula, to maintain and enhance this beaUTIFUL CITY.
It will invite responsible growth and pride of owner-
ship. Street clutter and ugliness of RVs parked on
streets and in yards, add to deterioration of neighbor-
nOdds. Property values decrease. Citizens who enjoy
Living i~ W~!.9~$Q~ained, beautiful neighborhoods,
with pride of ownership, will move out, and those who
do not care will move in. Home values will hit rock
bottom in these blighte0 neighborhoods.
The appeal of 3ohn Lynn, published November 13th in the
Californian contains many points of concern, which we
share. The following portion of his appeal, bears
repeating:
"Third: Other_cities can and do enforce the
same or similar parking regulations. Temecula
can ei~he'r help maintain the beauty of the
neighborhoods or remove the code and contribute to
their deterioration."
Thank you for considering our concerns.
MRS. MARIE DUNN
30156 La Primavera, Temecula
Phone: 676-3059
V~A FJ&,O[
20October 1997
TO: Ctty Counct1Paanbe~s
Ctty of Temecula
SLJBJECT: Chapter 17.24 of Oevelopment Code - Sectton 17.24.020
Off-Street Parktrig and Loadtng
My name !s Joanne Phtlllps and [ restde, ¥tth aty husband, 011yet at
30361Trade~ater Ct. tn the Ctty of Temecul&.
The Ctt¥ Count11 has had various discussions recently regarding Off-
Street Parktng, and more specifically as per~afns to RVs, boats, etc..
Back on 6 August 2997 ! sent a FAX (copy attached) to Hs. Ctndy Ketrsey
Code Enforcement Offtcer, for the CtTy of Temecula - regarding a
violation of the subject Code, Section 17.24.020. This specifically
~resses. t~e f~ct of.motorhomes parktrig on the street legally for a
~ oay perleo and then being able to move tt to the other stde of the
street and betrig able agatn to leave it there for another 6 da~s, etc.
!t ts hard for me to understand ho~thts can be allowed! He have a
beoutt~ul c~t¥ and you, as members of the C~ty Council, ar~ a11owtnq
thts type pf unsightly ~htngs to occur. HOld ~ TH~S BE??????
~e are members of the The Vtllages Hone Okmers Association group and
our CC&Rs restrict ove~tght parktng tn the streets - ho~ever, tt can-
not be enforce BECAUSE THE C~TY OF TEFECULA !S NOT NiLLING TO BACK US
UP. He, too,have a motor home - tt ts parked behtnd ga~es (1egaTly
accelling to our CC&Rs) because we belteve tn following the rules -
! know rules are made to be broken - but that ts not how tt should be.
if~e leave our motorhom~ out parked tn our drtve~ay for a day or two
whtle we are getttng ready to go on a trtp or are cleaning/washing
same and the homeowners association comes by and sees tt there, ~e are
Immediately nottfted TO move same - and ft's on our o~m prope~cyl
! belteve It ts about ttmo that our Ctty CounctT look out for the vast
m~lorlty of the ctttzens of thts great otty and de¢tde to put a law tnto
affect that dtsalTo~s overnight parktn9 or continuous parktng of motor-
homes, boats, btg trucks, etc. on our streets.
PLEASE TAKE NECESSARY ACT!ON TO STOP THiS TYPE OF THING FROM RU~NZNG OUR
CiTY AND CAUSING PROPERTY VALUE TO GO IX)kIN TO SAY NOTHING O~ THE FACT
THAT IT LOOKS ABSOLUTELY TERRZBL£ - IF HE HANTED TO LiVE LIXE TRASH
HE SURE I~OULDN'T HAVE NOVED HERE.
SINCERELY, ~.
~O]I~INE PHiLLiPS
(676-4466)
20 October 1997
TO: CJty CouncJ11dembers
Cttyof Temecula
SUB~£CT: Chapter 17.24 of Development Code - Sectton 17.24.020
Off-S~'eet Parktng and Loadtng
My name ts Joanne PhtlIJps and [ ~stde, wtth RY husband, 011yet at
30361 Trade, aCer Ct. tn the City of Temecul&.
The City Count11 has had various discussions recently regarding Off-
Street Parktrig, and mor~ specifically as pertains to RVs, boats, etc..
Back on 6 August 1997 [ sent a FAX (copy attached) to Hs. Ctndy Ketrsey
Code Enforcement Officer, for the Ctt~ of Temecula - regarding a
violation of the subject Code, Section 17.24.020. Thts specifically
addresses the fact of motorhomes parktng on the street legally for a
6 day perrod and then betng able to move ~t to the other s~de of the
street and betng able agatn To leave Jt there for another 5 days, etc.
Zt ts ha~d for me to under~tand ho~thts can be allowed! ~e have a
bequtfful ctty and .you, as members of the C{ty Count11, are allowing
thts tYDe pf uns.tghtl~ thtnqs to pccur. HO~AJ~ TH~S ~£??????
#e are members of the The ¥tllages Home Okmers Association g~oup and
our CC&Rs restrtct ove~tght parktng In the streets - ho~ever, tt can-
not be enforce BECAUSE THE CiTY OF TEFECULA IS NOT HZLLING TO BACK US
UP. He, too,have a motor home - Jt 1s parked behtnd gal~s (1egaTly
acco~ltng to our ¢C&Rs) becausewe belleve tn following the rules -
! kno~ rules are made to be broken - but that ts not hw tt should be.
If we leave our motorhomo out parked tn our drJve~ay for a day or t~o
whtle tve are gettJn6 ~eady to go on a trtp or ar~ cleaning/washing
same a~d the homoo~ners association comes by and sees It there, we are
Immediately nottfted to move same - and ft's on our o~m prope~'cyl
i belteve tt ts about ttme that our City Council look out for the vast
maJortry of the ctttzens of this great ctty and decide to put a law Jnto
affect that disallows overnight parktng or continuous parktng of motor-
homes. boats, btg t~ucks, etc. on our streets.
PLEASE TAkE NECESSARY ACTION TO STOP TIJZS TYPE OF TIJZXG FROH RUZNiMG OUR
CiTY AND CAUSXNG PROPERTY VALUE TO GO DOHN TO SAY ~OTHZNG OFT HE FACT
THAT it LOOKS ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE - iF I~[ k/ANTED TO LiVE LiKE TRASH
HE SURE t~OULDN'T HAYE HOVED HERE.
SZNCERELy,
(676- 4 6)
~c: G. Thornhill
2 December 1997
Linda Fahey
Chairwoman, Temecula Planning Commission
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Ms Fahey:
At the 1 December meeting of the Temecula Planning Commission discussion
pertaining to a section of the City's Development Code was "continued off
calendar". That section has to do with storage of recreational vehicles in
residential areas. A review of the doc~,ments provided to the public at that
meeting indicates some Planning Commission and/or staff confusion regarding
the subject.
- The December 1 agenda provided to the public provides the following
regarding this subject:
"Proposal: Rej, enl ,qection 17. ~.4(D)(1)(/) of the City's
Development Code Pertaining to Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage in
Residential Areas"
- A memorsnd~,m to the Planning Commission from Debbie Ubnoske,
Planning Manager provides the following concerning the same subject:
Subject: Planning Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment
to Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code Pertaining to
Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage in Residential Areas"
Ms Ubnoske -- in her "Background" section of the memo states
that "The City Council originally directed staff to amend Section ............... "
The subject was titled "Repeal" at the 3 November Planning Commission
meeting -- now it appears that a decision has been made without public notice
to modify the original subject to one of "Amendment". Further, the section of
the D~velopment Code cited is different. Did we miss notification by the
Planning Commission that the original subject had been changed? Has it been
chz,~ged? Was the original subject in error? Is the staff in error?
The public has a right to accurate information concerning proposed changes; if
for no other reason than to be able to respond intelligently to those proposals.
Response to a proposed rRP. e,~ is very different from that for an zmendrnent.
In regards the same'subject -- but with a different focus:
When several people show up at a meeting of the Planning Cornmission
anticipating a discussion of a topic and are then notified that the subject is
being "continued off calendar" it can -- it does -- make those people suspicious
of the reason(s) for the continuance. For exsmple:
- Is the Planning Commission just waiting for people to lose interest so
that they can do what they want without being in the spotlight of public
pressure?
- Are members of the Commission or their staff predisposed to repeal or
amend the section regardless of public opinion?
- Is pressure being exerted by the City Council?
I don't accuse either the City Council or the Commission or its staff of any of
these motives. I only list them as ways the public can -- and often does -- think
about their gorefoment. I would like to think that the reason for the
continuance has to do with an overworked staff who just haven't have enough
time to complete their task
Might I s ,ug,~gest that some explan,a, tion to the public is warranted when a
subject is Continued off calendar ? There is a lot of public suspicion of
government today, both locally and nation wide. You could help reduce that
suspicion in Temecula by the Simple act of providing a rational explanation of
the reasons.
A copy of my original letter to 'the City Council and the Planning Commission is
included. I wish to ensure that my views as a citizen of Temecula are
considered when the subject is again considered.
Sincerely,
32~7 Plier Belair
Temecula, CA 92592
693-0929
Enclosure
cc: r~eemecula City Council
The Californian
4 November 1997
Temecula City Council and
Temecula Planning Commission
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Re: Repeal of Section 17.24(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code Pertaining
to Recreational Vehicle Storage in Residential Areas
At a 3 November meeting of the Temecula Plnnning Commission the
referenced agenda item was withdrawn from consideration pending further
study of the issue. However, before moving on to the next agenda item, the
Planning Cowmi ssion provided opportunity for the public to voice concerns
about the proposed repeal.
We would like to comment, in greater detail than the three minute Commission
limit allows, on two issues raised during the public responses.
Enfore~.m~.nt: Three comments here. First: Commissioner Guerriero
asked about numbers of personnel needed to enforce the code. Why has the
code not been forcefully enforced to date? Had it been enforced with vigor the
number of personnel needed at this time would not be signi6cant. Residents
would have been made aware of the inconveniences involved in violating the
code. Initial vigorous enforcement activities at this time might require
additional personnel to be used, but a lower level would ul~.im~,te]y be required.
The code enforcement must include significant penalties. Some people have to
be hit over the head with a 2 x 4 to get their attention.
Second: One speaker from a Homeowner's Association noted that asking the
HOAs to enforce parking regulations pits neighbor against neighbor, leading to
neighborhood feuds and hatred. He suggested that the City is the better
regulatory agency. Comment: Our experience in 3 HOAs over the last 16
years is that the speaker is right. Asking the HOAs to enforce parking
regulations on city owned streets can lead to feuds, anger, and, in extreme
cases -- violence. The city owns the streets. The city has an enforceable code
on the'books. The city should enforce it. Without that enforcement the HOAS
are forced into long, expensive, and sometimes losing legal battles with people
who have little regard for their neighbors, their neighborhood, or property
values. "Curb appeal" is a significant factor in home re-sale. A cluttered
neighborhood reduces curb appeal.
Third. Other cities can and do enforce the same or similar parking regulations.
Temecula can either help maintain the beauty of its neighborhoods or remove
the code and contribute to their deterioration.
o
!~V. ]~t~. F.,~..qtor~: We note that an agenda report concerning
this item states that the City's Code Enforcement Officers "have met with
resistance from property owners who have no where else to store their trailers,
RVs, and boats. However, the City is currently processing several applications
for self storage facilities. These are expected to provide ~,~rl. itional storage
opportunities." Comment: Are the majority of City residents to be penalized
because some residents will not accept their responsibilities as citizens of
Temecula and (where they live in HOAs) members of HOAs? Ignorance of the
law has never been a legal defense. People with RVs, trailers, boats, tanks,
giant earth movers, tar roofing trucks, elephants, and Siberian Yaks have a
responsibility that we all share -- to conform to all established laws, codes,
rules and regulations-- whether they like them or not.
We appreciate your consideration of these items as you move to
reconsideration of this issue. We urge retention of the code -- and its vigorous
enforcement.
Sincerely,
M/M John Lynn
32237 Placer Belair
Temecula, CA 92592
693~0929
cc: The Califorman
JTuesdey December 9, 1997 12:~m -- F~au '310 ~68' -- Pege l J
12/09/97 13:23 FAX 310 3. 4488 CZTY OF R.H.E.
~J001
CITY COUHCIL POLICY
FARK:!:lqG OF RECREA~ON VEKICLES IN THE CITY
OCTOBER 28, 1976
HUNICI_PAL CODI~ SECTION 1827(h)(1)
'NO HOTOF, VEHICLE CAN BE STORKD OR PARKE~ EXCEPT IN AN KNTIR~LY
ENCLOSED SPACE.'
HUNICIPAL CODK SECTION 1827(h)(3)
'SUCK PARKING SPACES SHALL Be. LOCATED I[N THE REAR OF THE FRONT
SETSAll LIHE, I.~rcE1,T IN HOUN~ATN AREAS ~ HIL~ LO~ ~
At £he meeting of the City Council on October 26, 1976, the following policy of
enforceuent of the forefoing. Sections fo the Munic~pal Code (Zonin~
Code***D~recced the City Hanager:
TO ENFORCE THE ZONING CODE PROVISIONS RELATIVE TO PARKING OF
RF, C~TION VEHiCLeS IN ~0~ Y~ S~~, S~C ~ POLI~
~T IF SU~ ~~ ~ P~ ~ ~S~E ~ ~ Y~ B~
~ FRO~ Y~ S~ ~ IS ~A~LY S~~ ~N V~ BY
F~, WAT.T. ~ ~U~ERY IT ~ BE P~~D.
This policy sta~emen~ co be ploced in the Zoning Code in front of Article IX,
Section 1827(h).
November 15, 1997
NOV 2 0 199~
Mr. Ron Bradley
City Manager
City of Tcmccula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Bradley:
The issue of Recreational Vehicles (Campers, Boats, Trailers, Fifth Wheels, and Motor Homes) in
our residential area is of concern to me.
On Villa Alturas Drive, where I live, there is a Rec~nal Vehicle parked in a driveway on blocks
to keep it level -- as it is being used as an extra bedroom! Just a few houses beyond the mobile
bedchamber, a welding business is operating out of the garage, and unsighfiy old cars are being
worked on in the street and driveway.' This was once a lovely neighborhood in a beautiful city, but is
now just one of many Temecula su'eets .that is beginning to look run down and ragged.
I want to see the City Code enforced, but the existing laws don't appear to be clear or enforceable, as
written. Perhaps the vehicle code governing residential parking needs to be rewritten so that it is
Cl..E~ AND PRECISE and carries a HEFTYMONETARY PENAL17'; one STRONG ENOUGH to deter violators.
Let's strive to keep The City of Temecula a city we can all be proud off
Sincerely yours,
Marcia Watkins
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
APRIL 21, 1998
R:~TAY~RPT~MgPA9?.P~A ~! mf 2(~
APPR~.~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER -~.~.~-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
April 21, 1998
Storage of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the City Council and
Planning Commission:
Receive the Staff Report and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the
Storage of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones
BACKGROUND
At the August 12, 1997 City Council meeting, Mayor Birdsall requested staff prepare a report
discussing the issue of recreational vehicle storage in residential districts. Staff brought this
report before the Council on September 23, 1997. At that meeting the City Council directed
staff to delete Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code pertaining to
recreational vehicle storage in residential areas. This Section, which intends to allow temporary
on-site storage of recreational vehicles in residential zones states:
"Except as provided herein, vehicles parked within public view in required or
authorized parking areas within the front yard, corner side yard or side yard
abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for temporary periods of time
not to exceed five (5) consecutive days."
Since deletion of this Section of the Development Code would require an Ordinance
Amendment, this item was placed on the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission agenda for
Commission action. However, upon further consideration, the Council directed staff to conduct
additional research on this matter. At the November 3, 1997 Planning Commission meeting,
staff requested this item be continued to the December 1, 1997 Planning Commission hearing.
Staff then ~equested this issue be continued off-calendar at the December 1, 1997 meeting
until the research was conducted.
Staff placed this item on the Commission Business section of the February 2, 1998' Planning
Commission meeting and requested that the Commission provide direction to staff regarding
three potential options (discussed below in the Analysis Section) for recreational vehicle storage
R:\STAFFRFT~RV.PC-CC.NO1 4/10/98 klb 1
in residential zones. After reviewing the options and receiving public testimony from seventeen
residents, the Commission unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Soltysiak was absent)
recommended that the existing Development Code provisions remain in effect and be enforced
with the existing penalties. They also recommended that additional staff resources recluired for
effective enforcement be considered by the Council. it should be noted that of the seventeen
residents who spoke at the Commission hearing, sixteen were in favor of enforcing the existing
provisions of the Development Code.
This item was tentatively scheduled for the March 17, 1998 City Council meeting; however,
staff was directed to remove this item from the that meeting's agenda and not bring it before
the Council until after a joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop could be held to
discuss the item.
ANALYSIS
ODtions Presented by
Staff presented three options to the Planning Commission at their February 2, 1998 meeting
based upon the research conducted on this issue.
Option No. I - Utilize Current Code Provisions: Prohibition
This option would be to direct staff to utilize the current provisions contained in the
Development Code to prohibit long-term parking/storage of recreational vehicles in front yards
of residential zones. Recommendations received in letters from residents include: increased
enforcement by the City and the inclusion of significant penalties for infractions.
Increased enforcement would require additional staff resources. Enforcement of the Code has
been primarily driven by complaints received from residents. According to Code Enforcement
staff, enforcement of this item has recluired al~proximately 30-40% of their staff hours and
would require the same if they were to pro-actively enforce the Ordinance. In order to
effectively enforce these regulations, one-half of a Code Enforcement staff person would be
rec~uired at the current time. The cost to the City (in 1998 dollars) would be $27,259.00
annually. This figure would likely be higher in future years. It should be noted that, if an
additional staff member is not added, other areas of code enforcement will be impacted. in
addition, with the current residential growth in Temecula, at approximately 700 new homes per
year, the limited staff resources would be stretched even thinner.
Option No. 2 - Delete Section 17.24.020(Di(l)(fJ of the City's Deveioprnent Code: No
Regulation
This option would delete the current Development Code language, and result in the City not
regulating recreational vehicles on private property in residential zones. This option, which
would result in the same condition which existed before the adoption of the Development Code,
would place the burden for enforcement upon the individual Homeowner's Associations
(HOA's), and would result in no regulation in areas of the City where HOA's are inactive or do
not exist. According to several residents who have served on the Board of Directors for a HOA,
enforcement is expensive, time consuming and ineffective. Correspondence from several
residents (see Attachment No. 1) indicates that they are not in favor of this option, while one
resident was in favor of this method of regulation. At the request of the Council, staff
R:~STAFFR. PT~RV. PC-CC.NOI 4110/98 Idb 2
contacted the City of 'Irvine and was informed that they leave the enforcement of this
regulation with the HOA's.
Option No. 3 - Modify Section 17.24.020 (D) of the Development Code: Prohibition with
Exemptions for Special Circumstances
Several cities (Palm Sl~rings, Palm Desert and Poway) allow I~arking/storage of recreation
vehicles in a front yard, if it is not possible to store them in either the side or rear yard or a
sellarate garage. These cities allow a recreational vehicle to be parked in a front yard if the
area is paved. Palm Springs and Palm Desert require the owner to receive a permit to park the
recreational vehicle in the front yard area. To receive a permit, the Planning Department of
these cities provides written notice to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed location
of the recreational vehicle. Should a written objection be received or should the Planning
Department determine not to issue the permit, then the matter is referred to the Planning
Commission which holds a noticed public hearing with respect to the issuance of a permit.
This option would require additional staff time to process the applications. An aplDtication fee
would be assessed to the homeowner to offset staff time, materials and postage for the public
hearing. Code Enforcement staff would also be required for violations. Given the current
interest in stronger regulations to prohibit the storage/parking of recreation vehicles on-site in
driveways, and the additional time requirements placed upon the current staff, this option does
not appear to achieve that objective.
On-Street Storace/Parkin~
The issue of on-street storage/parking of recreational vehicles was raised by several residents
and was also discussed by the Commission. The residents understood that on-street parking
is regulated by the California Vehicle Code; however, they stated that the intent of this
regulation was being circumvented by people who regularly move their vehicles within the
prescribed 72 hour period. Their concern was that if the City were to strongly enforce the
existing Development Code regulations, then there would be a proliferation of on-street parking
of recreational vehicles. Some residents stated they would like to see the City involved in
stronger on-street parking regulations.
Citv of Fullerton RV Code Provisions
At the direction of the City Council, Staff contacted the City of Fullerton and received a copy
of their Zoning Code which regulated recreational vehicles in residential zones. This is included
as Attachment No. 3 to this Report. Based on their code, recreational vehicles are allowed in
residential zones if all of the following conditions are satisfied: the vehicles are not used for
living purposes, the vehicles are limited to those owned by the occupant of the dwelling unit
and they are not parked or stored whereas to constitute a "clear and demonstrable vehicular
traffic hazard, or be a threat to public health or safety." In addition, the recreational vehicle
cannot be stored within the front yard where there is an existing driveway or other access
leading to t.he rear yard of the residence that car~ accommodate such vehicle. Lastly, parallel
parking to the front property line is prohibited except where a curved or circular driveway
exists. In those cases, suitable screening of the recreational vehicle shall be provided.
R:~STAFFRFT~RV-PC.CC.NOI 4/10/98 klb 3
Corresnondence Received
Correspondence received regarding this matter which has been addressed to the City Council
has been distributed to the Council as they have been received by Staff. Correspondence
received prior to March 17, 1998 is included as Attachment No. 1. Any correspondence
received since then, but prior to April 21, 1998 is included as Attachment No. 2 to this Report.
Attachments:
Correspondence Received Prior to March 17, 1998 - Page 5
Correspondence Received Prior to April 21, 1998 Workshop - Page 6
City of Fullerton RV Storage Ordinance - Page 7
R:~STAFFRFT~RV-PC-CC,NOI 4/10198 klb ~.
A,?TACHMENT'NO. 1
C~RRESPONDENCE RECEIVED PRIOR TO. MARCH 17, .1998
Ron Bradley
Gary Thornhill
SANDRA I_* RUMSEY
30845 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO
TEMECUI.A, CA 92591
909-676-6946
March 16, 1998
The Honorable Councilmen
City of Temecu!a
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca. 92590
Honorable Councilmen;
i am writing concerning an issue to be discussed on
your March 17, 1998 agenda, the parking of R.V.'s on your
property.
Why are R.V.'s that are maintained any worse ~han
corrals with horses, goats, etc.? I have neighbors with
animals and that is their right, but so is an R.V. A well-
maintained R.V. is a sign of fluency for an area. Many of
the residences of this area bought their proper~y for 5he
purpose of being able to park their R.V.'s, boats, etc.
and have animals on their property. Many of these people
have lived in the area for 15-20 years and now you say
they possibly can't park their R.V.'s next to their homes.
Have you taken in~o consideration tha~ many of the R.V.'s
have cost more 5ban many homes cos~? As i drive aroun~ our
area, I have no5 seen many R.V.'s that were not maintained
and had an unsigh~!y a~ea around the R.V.
First, I must sta~e that I don't like an association
dictating what i must do on my property. What has happened
to the individuals property rights that were written about
in the Constitution. We have individuals that walk the
neighborhood to find ~he K.V. parked on the home owner's
property. They then sight these individuals. It is rather
rude not to attemp~ to contac~ the homeowner, but a formal
letter from their a~torney arrives and says 5ha5 you have
x amount of days ~o correct the infraction. Though I
d~sagrae with [he association actions we were able ~o
finally come to an agreement on screening our R.V., but ~-
was not wiChout problems, as we had only weeks before
taken photographs and taken them to the association and
asked their approval. No, we did not have 5his approval in
writinG, but felt a verbal approval was adequate as it had
been in the-pass. We also felt ~hat the request they made
was unsafe for pulling out of our driveway. We also are
located on both the Edison easement and the Eastern
Municiple easemen~ and can't put permanent s~ructures in
~hese areas. We did finaliv agree on plants. Even though
we agreed to the associa~zns demands, I feel that iz is
not the place for ~he association or city council T~
mandate ~.V. parking on a persons property. i know ~= I
were to move I would no~ purchase a home with an
association nor would I consider moving To a city that has
these mandates. Are we losing our freedoms and becoming a
de pot to the environmental activists? Of course, these
freedoms need to be within a reasonable realm. - am
reminded o~ a le~ter sent to "The Californian" a few years
ago. A gentleman was saying, and I paraphrase, a friend
Zha~ was a former Temecuia resident had moved ~o an area
north cf Dallas, Tx., going in for permizs zo built his
kome. They had no regulations but ask if he wansed to
build a house tha5 did no~ have proper pluambinu, scrrect
electrical, and was going to fall down. He said no, they
~hen say that enough was said. The regulations of local,
state, and federal governments are preventing freedom of
our people. Yes, some regulations are required, but the
reGulasions are becoming oppressive to these freedoms.
To conclude, I wish to again sta~e ~hat i am not in
favor of the City Council taking action on R.V. parking. i
always thought ~hat this country was formed as a
democracy, but are we becoming a country of the few ruling
the many as in a de pot or ~ota!itarian ~ = ~.
gove_.~n_ A~e
zhese ~=
__w causing harm ~o the freedoms of our pecpie?
S_nce___y, _
andy ~L~m~ey ~
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula CA 92589-9033
30300 Churchill Court
Temecula CA 92591
March 11, 1998
SUBJECT:
City Council Discussion Regarding Parking/Storage
of RVs in Residential Zones
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Since I have spent 6 straight years as the President of the
villages Home Owner Assoc. which includes some 1000 members,
I applaud the City Council in taking up a discussion of parking
and storing RVs in residential zones.
I would ask that the discussion be broadened to include RVs,
trailers, boats, and commercial trailers. (example; concrete
mixers, searchlights, landscapers' trailers, etc.) We should
also include the parking of commercial vehicles in excess of
20 feet.
The action by the above people has turned parts of our fair
city into zones of blight. They are not concerned about property
values or quality of life, to say nothing about the danger to
children who dart out from behind these vehicles into the street.
Almost all HOAs have CCRs against the above actions, but
unfortunately they are almost unenforceable. If they are in
the street, the hands of ~he HOA are tied, according to 2 law
firms from whom we have requested legal advice. If they are
parked on private property, there are months of warnings, then
fines, and finally the courts .... at great expense and time.
Meanwhile the homeowner or renter continues to ignore the rules.
If they are parked on the street, they merely move it a few
feet or across the street for another 72 hours.
Some suggestions; no parking an any street or in front of a
home on private property without a permit. Permits will be
issued by the city for visitors up to 4 days, all others for
24 to 48 hours to clean, load, or unload. NO REPAIRS ALLOWED.
A simple call and the permit will be mailed or picked up at
City Hall. The window permit would have an expiration date.
Initially, there would be a 30 day warning period city wide,
after that the vehicle will be ticketed or towed.
The largest amount of commercial vehicles are found on the
weekend, so there must be a planned drive-by enforcement. There
is now and will be more adequate storage areas. Although this
is an inconvenience it is hardly a hardship.
Any way that I can be of help, please feel free to call or write.
Sincerely,
David Mic~hea~
676-7220 ~
P.S. My wife would like me to tell you of our experience in
Naperville, Illinois. We stayed at a cousin's there while we
were traveling with our RV, and all it took was a call to the
city to advise them where we were and hhow long we would be
visiting, and they kept a computer printout for the police.
They were very warm and hospitable about it, and it made for
a very pleasant experience for us. I would like for visitors
to Temecula to have that same sort of hospitable experience.
40847 Carte Medusa
Temecula, CA 92591
l~'larch 10, 1998
Temecuia City Council
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033
Re: RV Parking On Private Property.
We recently received a flyer regarding the above and would like to voice our opinion
on this matter.
We have a motorhome on our property. We bought our house because it has a large
side yard which could accommodate our motorhome. We went through great expense
to cement the side yard in order to park our RV as far back into our yard as possible
and installed a six foot gate in front of this. The motorhome is barely visible from the
street.
We sympathize with people who do not have room for their motorhomes on their
side yards but also realize that it is not very appealing to a neighborhood if the RV
is constantly parked on the street or in the driveway.
If this was our problem we would definitely rent a space at a storage lot since we do
not think it would be considerate of our neighbors and most of all it could also be
a safety hazard.
We love our RV as I'm sure most people that own one do. We hooe that the few who
do not comoIv with street or drivewav Darkincl do not sooil it for the rest of us who have
gone to great expense and trouble to conceal our RV's as best as we can on our own
property..
Hope that this matter can be fairry resolved for all concerned.
, ~Si, ncerely,
JoselSh & Sylvia Santos
_~(909) 694-1854
cc: Matthew Fagan
Planning Dept.
Edward V. & Evelyn D. Salitore
42733 San Julian Place
Temecula, Ca 92592
Phone: (909)676-6355
RE: CITY OF T~CULA PARKING AND STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL
VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
Our concerns relative to the issue of Parking and Storage of Recreational
Vehicles in Temecuia's Residential Zones stems from the recommendation of
the City Planning Commission to the City Council to strengthen and vigor-
ously enforce the existing ordinance,which we feel has serlous flaws in it,
as well as Legal and Constitutional implications.
to the dictates of the Anti-Rv'ers with little recognition for the Legal
Residential Parking Rights of the great numbers of Recrea:ionai Vehicle
Owners in Temecuia.
Without question this is one of the most controversial issues presently
facing the Temecula City Council.There are two sides to this issue and
both deserve to get serious consideration.
The Anti R.V. group havelegitimate complaints about dangerous and careless
Recreational R.V. Parking on Public Streets deserve relief. Where flagrant
abuse of saftey regulations exist and can be proven, the parties responsibl~
should be held accountable.
Demands :hat ALL Recreational Vehicle owners in Temecula should be penalized
and punished along with the few law-breakers is discriminatory,ludicrous and
grossly unfair.
I?; CO~,C~SION .00D FOR THOUGHT:
1) Motor Homes,trailers boats_and Recreational Vehicles should be allowed to
be parked on driveways, when it is not feasible or possible to park them
behind the fenced or screened area of such property.
!t is important to note the fact that Recreational Vehicle owners in
Temecuia are Voters,many pay Homeowner Association ~ues as we!~ as
Property taxes, costly'Vehicle,Gas and License taxes and deserve'the
same considerations given to Automobile owners.
Respectfully,
Ed & Frie ~aiifore /
cc: Council Members
Mayor,Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero,Kare! Lindermans,Steve Ford,feff Stone
City Manager, Ron Bradley
Assoc. Planner, Matthew Fagan
Jeri D. Witt
30321 Tradewater Court
Temecula, CA 92591
March 9, 1998
Matthew Fagan, AICP
Associate Planner
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: Parking/Storage of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Thank you for your letter dated February 25, 1998 giving notice that the City Council
meeting has been reschecluled.
I will be unable to attend the meeting. However, I have enclosed several pictures of a
recreational vehicle belonging to a neighbor who regularly parks it on Tradewater
Court. The photos show the recreational vehicle parked in front of another neighboris
home.
The owner of the vehicle avoids the Code, which stipulates no parking longer than 72
hours on residential streets, by moving the vehicle from one side of the street to the
other. This recreational vehicle has remained on the street for over a week at a time.
Unsiclhtly
As you can see from the photos, the recreational vehicle is unsightly. It is out of place
in a residential community. It belongs in a RV park or an appropriate storage facility
designated for such vehicles.
Neaatively affects Home Values
Because recreational vehicles are unsightly, they negatively affect the home values of
the neighborhood. A prospective home buyer would arguably turn away from living in a
Page -2-
Matthew Fagan, AICP
Recreational Vehicles
neighborhood which is accepting of the storage of recreational vehicles on residential
streets.
Furthermore, such action encourages other owners of recreational vehicles to emulate
the violator's actions. This opens the flood gates resulting in trashy looking
neighborhoods which cause decreasing home values.
Safety Hazard
As shown by the photos, Tradewater Court has a bend. The combination of the parked
recreational vehicle and the curvature of the street makes it unsafe for both motorists
and children playing in front yards.
It is difficult to see around the recreational vehicle while entering or leaving Tradewater
Court. This poses clanger to drivers who do not see each other coming around the
corner. Moreover, this poses danger to children who dart out from behind the vehicle
into the street.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
.~1 ¢ounc±lmembers receive~
the same letter
March 9, 1998
Mayor Ron Roberts
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Dear Mayor Roberts:
co:
R. Bradley
G. Thornnili
My husband and I moved here in May of 1995 from Anaheim. We selected this area because of
its cleanliness and beauty and low crime rate. We were dismayed when our neighborhood began
to look like a gheno last summer. At one time, out of the first seven houses on our street (we are
the sixth house), there was a large boat on a trailer in one driveway, a camper shell jacked up in
another driveway; next door blocking our view was an older model 1970's truck with a large
camper ~ on it parked in the from side yard and the other side of us was a burned-out shell of a
car in the driveway. Needless to say, we were heartsick that we had moved to what we had
considered a lovely neighborhood. One day the code enforcement officer appeared and cited the
homeowners. The offending objects disappeared within a few days. We were once again able to
enjoy the beauty of our neighborhood.
That didn't last long. When the Press-Enterprise article appeared saying that the City Council
would no longer seek enforcement of that code, some of the blight reappeared. At the present
time, the old truck that won't pass a smog test and has an expired 1996 out-of-state license still
sits in the neighbor's front side yard blocking our view. We do not have a home owners
association. I believe it is the duty of the City to enforce and regulate a recreational vehicle
code.
As a former real-estate sales person, I know from experience that the property values of a
neighborhood are lowered when these vehicles are allowed to be stored in the yards, driveways,
and streets. Clients will not even look at properties for sale that have R.V.s, etc. parked near
them.
I hope the council will take a serious look at this concern. With the new dam and recreational site
being built nearby, we could be facing many more such vehicles and boats being brought to our
city. We need to have a code adZessing this problem with strong enforcement and stiff penalties
for violations.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Betty Condren
40741 Calle Katerine
Temecula, CA 92591
(909) 694-0375
-e~ecula, ~e implore you :o enact ano ENFORCE
rEs~r:-S:ng on ssreet a'- off s~r=et - -
....... ._. , . . ~::,_ _ ~.
"elC~OOr~OCJS.
Seven yea-~ aoo our ~ s~orv, 2600 sq ft.m-oedroem.
was ap~ra~sec as r2~5.008. Our nome is pic~urec '£elz~.
c"sav due : ~ p-2.-~ ~- -~,= '= -
eric_es ~r cri,/e?,av3, o- :~e 3%reeE. and in some ~ards. the
.51~_.~ -" ~- -.-me a~O ,:5~erz :m [~e =eichoornoc~ has grea51v
,7 ~2,- e -i~~ . ....
= ~ 5.0 i-. ~8iue .-.-Z ~,:~ ,-=~S ar= ~,;=- ~ ft ~3rk=O :~
E~'~ SZl.~':&,, '2- 1-'~5 '-" ~ are ~'=~ :- the cBra~=
Yo,J ~ii oO._r.. t~v motcrKomes 3~onc ~.ltr~ .5l'iD,~E
%r'JsKS. ~1io?~in,7 t~is %yDe
:n decreasin~ ~ropersy vsiues.
sooearance, and
have no ~:~,,~iK~ '
:: is ~aid ttat s g!r:ure szes,'s a :ho,;sano words. We hoce t-at
...... - - =eo :,-, remia~ _
-:', .,~qs a-'.z nas :,onsr.zL :.,st i:s £:reess. and t~at is mss
~'~e a-= i'formeg ~na- :-- ,_~tv ¢ Coce --rfor_-emen~
when responoing ~o ~ ci~i:en's compl~Lnc ~SoJ- 2~-~inG
~ovises the viol~tcr tK.~t all he must ~o to conpi,~ ,~itn
iS simoly to move the cffenoing vehicle a re, i~cnes every
mours. This Cons not solve the oro~!em of -amCsn~ s~ee~ berlins.
ano .~e feel -~r~sin cn~s is not the intent cf ~ce law. we
r. av'm at, .on-stre=~ sarK{~ :=~ cna* cles_s amav _h~ -
a~o ~ne ia~ mus~ ~e
£ECD'..IO: increasingly, large motor homes snC coats =-re sarke.o
'c criveways or c-her unsi~n'.ly areas cf the oroce--y in
~.~' -n= :-*re=~ and neighb_~_. Also mctor veni !es a-e -arkec
here- moved) in Crlve~ays for mon~ns. It is an~iclsa-~o
~ ac,-umulat~mn o~ :rs end large boa-s ~it~
· of --= Dom:rsocni ;ecres~icna! take near ~eme~. We nee.o
',.our aoenda reoo~t sta~o "- - ei- , ..... £nfc
,, .,_erz eye me~ ?:ith -eelsfarine tom Drsp=rt'/ owne ~ ~nc have
nc~ne-= eiso ~o store them. There are storage kacili~ies (one
off Psi@ ~oad for instance). Also these offenolng venic_es may be
'~-ureo ~'~itnin an enclosed area cn the omners' lcts. ~u~ cut cf
· i'~'a':,r~ .:an a=ford $:0,000 Co 675 300 for ;v's :m=y can su __v
~¢=':.0 to place ~nem in ~toraoe ¢scilLties or bulls ,n enclosure
=:r -nom. The), nave s duty -2 .obey the 'aw (es ,on 5=I ~:~:ens
rr. kCL_'_--llH: ~ve ~.a,,~ ~he nucleus ~c- -- oesu*:fu! it, ~
~-~ - ~ - c ". ~LE~SE -
-~l '.£ -i]~ work ~ ~ ' : ~ :
:el! ,m~ir'--"r, ec '-'*v. ' -
'.'.'e 3DD%eC~ ~-= .,Dot '3oS!O~'SZLO~ 'Dr s-dr
.:;e ;~ri:: :~r.~ir, g -roinances - anZ vigcro;s ~for-eme~.
Sincerely,
MA~iE DUNN
~0i~6 Ls Primavers
-emecuia, Ca. 92592
-3-
cc: Ro~ Bradley
Gary Thornhill
Mr. Norman J. Taylor
30048 Via Velez Place
Temecula, CA 92592
March 6, 1998
I have been a resident of this great city for 18 years. My wife and I are newly
retired senior citizens wishing for a wonderful retirement life. Two years ago we
purchased a very small 19 foot RV which we dearly enjoy. I have been informed
by fellow RV'rs that the city is proposing a ban on having them parked in our
own driveways. As a senior citizen on a retirement and social security I cannot
afford the monthly storage fees. I can understand the elimination of the street
parking but having it parked in ones own driveway seems reasonable.
As I stated above I have a beautiful 19 footer, no longer than a large pick-up
truck or even a minivan. I went to every home owner on my street asking them if
having my RV in my driveway offended them all said ABSOLUTELY NOT. I am
asking you to consider not letting this proposal pass. In my case I would be
forced to sell my RV, the greatest joy of our lives.
Respectfully,
Norman J. Taylor
Copies sent to all councilmember
City ~ounc_l
City Hall ,T~mecul=,&a.
- cc: R. Bracl~ey
(;. Thornh~
. Feb.ur.a~. 6, ;990
tn=~ ~.e p=~'~ng Rv's =zla ~,, ~r~ile~s, c~mpe;~ spells in a~.ive
=ha ~n szreets. in irun~ ul h~mes in resiaen~i~l~ =re~s. This m~Kes
me slc~ ~,hen i see ~nis mess ~n=~ ~ne neighbors a~e ~=2.'-~nr in
~i~,,ou~. h=vinf someone repor~ this to you, ~s
~150,OOO. fa.r our house plus all our upgraaes, olock ,all,
=~=ze, e:c %.~ ~' = i~t uf repos in this neignsc
a~r ~o us , ~hey ~us~ drive rlg~ by. Who wan~s 5~ live nex~
zc znaz. ':e =~e havin~ = n~ra zime sei!in~ because o:' znis.
...... ~ - ' :" '~= ~hls same F~olem ~i:h the Hoops
.'~-__eI%= io D_~i.,o . ·
:.e hal = .,~naerzuli neignuc. r .~no -as. ~2 is = Cop !n San Zief~
n=a ~,riue ~f ownership =no Kept that h~use pei'lec;. They put him
n ~= eam, sc ne n=a %0 se!~ =no move -- San Die~ . This
- z.._ S~.az T ' _
%..- house,. zeen ~fers. Bu% he owns = farage in Temec!ua
=m__y ccufnt k-
=ns 'he tzings those cars nome ~,~h him =n~ parks ~., i'ron~
~ . _ne~ zull !n ~ne a21ve .,,=y ,here 5he/ have = camper snell
~n._e ~arafe is full ~f ~_=lu, s~ zhe~ a~k in ~he gatale. So zney
:n :he sine ~,=ik also...e can'- .,=L~ us the slCe ~alk =- ~-~
....... S~--_e.
VYu ::=-~= sa/in~ '~e =2'e = 2lc~ C ~y, ~hy can'~ you pu~ ~n more people
-eer Msaa..'~ R~aa. Many zraiiers =re p=rKeu in arlve ways in our nei~h~o.
inc _ ayn't think 5nzs ~- -'=it -~ ~ne o%ner lana ~wners Xhy .
'~ E=~K in ~rai!er D~rKS? ~= .- nave ~ "~ "
My huso=nc 2usz an= 5 ~ye~=sses an= a near~ valve su~ in. He
~ ~e~ in%~ ~rguemenss ~.izn ~ne neighbors ~his is y.~ur ~--
enf .... ~:~ ~uie= Ch~'fin~ ~. ese ~e~uie f~r permits ~o ~arK isn't
De-very an,~=ppy nei~n~uz-s. This mus~ De taken care sf They m~ve~
':Li ..... s ~n ~=n.3, ,~Yu, they sn~u!a oe unp=cke= cy
Two more things I ; tu mention ~o you. I n , elec~ec sam
to speak for me. I wish someone wuula put ~h~t old Bastard in his place.
I want th~ En~ertainmen~ centez' ouilt in our City. we ~aitec ~ long
~ime fur it ~o come he£e ~'a ~ill just ale ~ithout it.people
· ~,~ Town
wan~ ~o close ~ne ~o0£ ~n growth, ~2%er ~ney get in~o the ciSy, they
wan~ u.~ let any on~ els~ in, T,o ~ac, ~,e neea .ous&ness =nd jobs here.
w~uld be a shame if Mu£z'iet~ stole ~his ~,~ay !rum us. p:gn~ h=ra £ur i~.
The other thing I wan~ ~a-~ks-yuu, When a£e you going ~o~upen up
N.General Kea~ney Roau.????? I~ w~s ~aken o{'f ~ne gener=i plan.
neec ~ha~ roa~ opened u?, ~ba~ gives us a s~raigh$ shot ~o ~ne shopping
~.e ,~re caugn~ in a-h.ole here, ,nly. w~y~.u~ is a~Chapperal school or
Ualley Macusa. All the neighoors here ~an~ ~hat stree~ built.
Tn=nK you for your help, I will oe w~i:ing to see ii' anything is
n
cone ~oou~ ~ne campers ,Trailers ana RV's a£ound here·
-Mrs. L.R. McNmny
~O165 Deer Meaaow
T emecul=~ Ca.,
92591-1607
909-699-417-3
I
TRASH
· Continued from
the cHs'. Mejia i~as sent nvo dozen
,/7~esmenm who refuse to comply
Me})a says paren~ usually ar~e
~ha[ mey are doing good b~ keep.
mn~ ~elr kids a[ ~o~e, bu~ ~ven~-
,n~ :ne~r ~oop bac~ to ihe*drive.
';They ~v. 'We're keeping our
kids fr~m l~[enng.'" Mejia ~id.
"but they oon't wetgA the eo~e.
quences'of the h~rd thev cre-
ate." '
Mudeta resident Valeme Sm~t~
~waJk wnen%er aau~nter want.
~u to increde the r~ge of her
noiatmg a counn' coae at tne' ume.
aria sa,~ she now will remove t~e
b~ket from the s~dewalk before
:~e =::7 roves ~er a nonce.
BILL GRAY
40414 YARDLEY COURT
TEMECULA, CA 92591
Febr-ary 20, 1998
Mr. Ronald H. Roberts. May. or
P.O. Box 9033
Temecuia. CA 92589-9033
Ref: Permanent Parking of RV'a, Boa~
etc. in Neighborhoods
Dear Mayor Roberts.
The purpose of this letter is to voice objections to the practice of permanently parking RV's. boats
and trailers in driveways a~nd on our r~id~ntial streets. I do appreciate you. Mr. Stone and IVa'. Linder-
man~ for recognizing the senons problem and agt~ing to send it back to the Planrang Commis~on for
evaluauon and now bnngmg it back to the City Council.
I'm ve.ry pleased that the Plartmng Comuussion detenmned that the code. ~xinen several ve, a~
ago, that regulale~ driveway parking is a good law and v~. much need~l. I appeal to you and oti~r
mem~rs of the Council to reinstate this code. effective imm~liately.
The e.vasting code that governs street paficing is inn,b"~pmte. Violators now avoid the intent of the
law ~- moving their vehicles a few feet after the 72 hour period. I mggest the City Council send this
Code back to the Planning Commission and then in turn ask Mr. Matthew Fagan, As,~cmte Planner, or
other members of the staff to research this problem and deemuric how other municipaliti~ effectively
addt~s flus issue. The revised co~ must includ~ not only car~ and tmck.~ but also RV's, boats, trai~rs.
farm eclmpment. etc. I would reammend that the practice of towing offending vehicles be eliminated as
that lends itseffto lawsrata against the City. I think unless the vehicle is abandoned. frees similar m those
for driveway offenses is more praeueal and would be cost effective to enforce. The Code must be ckar
and precise w'~th no loopholes. The message to all citizens should be. ~you break the law vou will be
prosecuted. -
The importance of these two laws are e~adent. They are ne~led to insure that our ciw remains
beautiful. They. will prevent home values from further devaiuation. They will curtail the uns;ghtly and
junky appearance m our neighborhooda. They will correct a safety haza~ that now exists when backing
out of driveways and childten pl~'ing in thei~ front yards. The lairs will be in ptace as our cxty grows and
a~so will prevent an increase of more RV's and boat~ when the Dometagore reservoir and the Vail Lake
Projec~ are completed.
I do tlank that people owning recreational vehicles should be allowed to park m their driv~.av or
street, for a demrtmned period of hours, when servicing, l:n~"!:m'mg. or returning from a top. The con~rn
for the vast majority of our citizens bv our c~ty gox~ernment is commendable. We thank aH of you for
providing the leadership that has ma~ Temecula a desirable place to live.
With Regards,
Steven J. Ford, Mayor Pro-Tern
Jet~-y. E. Stone, Councilman
Karel F. Lindermans. Councilman
Jeff Comcrchero. Couincilman
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
~,' Matthew Fagan. Associate Planner
Bill Gray
¢¢: Gary Thoz
PAUL D KNOWLE$
40760 CALLE KATERINE
'r'EMECULA. CALIFORNIA
92591
(909) 676-2853
City Council ... "-'
Attn: Ron RobertsT Mayor
City of T~me~ula
4320?Business Park Drive
~ Box 9033
/'Temecula, CA 92589-9033
February 19, 1998
Dear Mr. Roberts:
I am registering my concerns regarding front yard/street parking of RV, boat and other
extracurncular equipment.
I attended the Planning Commission meeting on February 2, 1998 and heard both the
pros and cons of the issue. I am clearly on the pro side of enforcing the current code.
My concerns are included in my letter to the Planning Commission - COlby enclosed.
I urge the Council to enforce the provisions currently in place, and/or to take the steps
necessary to make them appropriately enforceable.
Thank you for serving us,
Paul D. Knowles
CC:
Steve Ford,
Jeff Stone,
Jeff Comanchero,
Karel Lindemans,
Ron Bradley,
Susan JonesT-'
Mayor- pro tem
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
City Manager
City Clerk
FEB 2 0 7~.9~
Planning Commission
Attn: Linda Fahey
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Dnve
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
PAUL D. KNOWLE$
40760 CALLE KATERINE
TEMEC..ULA. CALIFORNIA
92591
(9O9) 676-2653
February 19, 1998
Dear Chairman Fahey:
I want to express my appreciation for the general tenor of the PC meeting on February 2,
1998 re: RV, boat and other objects 'd arte in our beautiful community.
I am hopeful that the City Council sees the thing as cleady. This is about keeping our town
a visually beautiful place in which to live. ! have concerns for those whose recreational
pursuits recluire other accoutrements to accomplish, however they knew the restrictions
before they bought here, and if they didn't they should have done their homework!
In Mr. Fagin's report to you, I had this immediate idea. With all the retired talent of
professional law enforcement living in the Temecula Valley, the City could easily find a part
time Code Enforcement Official, have 1099 relationship with them. This could be clone at
a cost far less that the 27+K figure quoted under option1. I also realize Mr. Fagin's charge
or place was not to make those types of recommendations to the Commission. Just a
thought of mine.
I trust your report to the Council bore out the concern of the maionty of the people in this
matter, I will be an interested attendee to their meeting on March 10,1998 to wew the
proceedings
Keep up the good work!
Best regards,
Paul D. Knowles
cc: Marcia Slaven
Rich Sottysiak
Ron Guerrlero
Timothy Miller
Ron Parks
JACK LEATHERS
4262:3 REMORA STREET
TEMECULA, CA 92592
February 17, 1998
Mr. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Ref: Parking of Recreational Vehicles
in Residential Areas
Dear Mavor Roberts,
It is my understanding that the Council will have the above named subject on their
agenda on March 10, 1998, for action. Since I will be out of town I want to voice mv
opinion to you via letter.
I have attended the meetings of the Planning Commission concerning this subject
and testified in front of them. My fi-iend, Mr. Bill Gray, and I have also met with Mr.
Matthew Fagen concerning this code, and expressed to him our feelings about this matter.
Many people are concerned about the increased parking of RV's, boats, and house
trailers on driveways and in the street. We are also concerned why the code that already
exists has not been enforced. '
I have been president of our Alta Vista Community Association for three years in
the past, and soon found that we had a problem with all these vehicles being parked on
driveways and in the street. We do have CC&R's that prohibit this unless they are parked
behind a fence in their side yard. The problem is the procedure that we have to go
through to enforce these rules. If the violator wants to be difficult it could take many
months to a year to get this resolved. Meanwhile the Association has had the expense of
an attomey, held many heanngs, issued fmcs, and finally when the fines aren't paid placed
a lien on the property. AS you can see, this could also cause quite a disruption in the
community. So I am saying to you that this route is not the answer!
The main reasons why I think these vehicles should not be allowed to park in
driveways and on the street are as follows:
1. Properties are devalued.
2. Safety when neighbors back out of their adjacent driveways
and are unable to see moving traffic and kids playing.
3. Undesirable views fi'om one's home if you live nearby.
4. A junky appearance tends to develop not only around that residence
but also in the community.
5. Future development such as the East Side Lake will bring many more
recreational vehicles into this community, and the code will certainly be
tested. If we continue to have additional parking of these vehicles, ~he
communities will really look junkv and property values will decrease.
I think that people owning recreational v~hicles should be allowed to have them at
home long enough to service them and load them. A reasonable amount of time should be
allowed for this. Having a unit parked on the street, and moving it a few feet just to avoid
the Code being reinforced is not proper. This is a loophole that should be closed. lira
property owner has a friend visiting with an RV, a permit should be required for them to
park, for any considerable length of time.
As for as the cost ofettforcing of the rules, I feel that the City cann~)t afford not to
get involved, and the cost whatever it is, should be allowed. If the fines are large enough
and the rules made known to everyone, it won't take long until the violations will beat a
minimum. Ifit takes an additional code enforcement of Scer, then so be it. We spend
money to make our parks look well kept and the appearance superior, so why not spend
money to make our total City look the same. It will be appreciated by most of the resi-
dents!
I want to thank you, the total City Council, the City Manager and all the staff for
all the work that has been done to make our City what it is today. We are proud of you
and o£ it. May your success continue to grow.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor Pro Tern
Jeffrey E. Stone, Councilman
JeffComerchero, Councilman
Karel F. Linderoans, Councilman
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner ,---
Very.t~'uly yours,
.//~ck Leathers
February 16, 1998
FEB ¢. 3 1.998
All Councilmembers received
same letter.
Ron Roberts, Councilman
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA. 92590
cc: Ron Bradlev
Gary Thornhill
Dear Sir:
I have been a homeowner in this city since 1989. My wife & I are
retired and on a fixed income. We have a 25 ft. travel trailer
that we could keep in our driveway but we Day to have it stored at
Lake Skinner in their storage facility.
I am concerned about the downgrading in the appearance of our
neighborhood with the proliferation of motor homes, boats, etc.
that are being parked in driveways and on the street. Some :
being used as another bedroom as well.
! play by the rules - I expect others to do likewise or pay the
price - and ! expect the 'price' to be very high. If a person can
afford an RV, they can afford to store it in a storage facility.
I trust my city councilmen and I trust that they will answer the
call and do their duty.
Sincerely yours,
F.H. GEYE~
40466 Cha~ncey Way
Temecula, CA 92591
Alta Vista Community Association
P.O. Box 890143
Temecula. CA 92589-0143
(909) 676-1465
co:
Gary Thornhill
Ron Bradley
February4,1998
City of Temecula
Arm: City. Council
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Councilmembers:
RE: RV Parking and Storage
We are writing this letter on behalf of the Alta Vista Community Association.
We are located just north of Rancho Vista Road and east ofMira Loma Drive, bv Vail
Elementan' School. CC&Rs and Rules & Regulations govern our homeowners
association. These documents contain rules prohibiting the parking or storage of
recreational vehicles, including travel trailers and motorhomes, within the association
unless specific conditions are met. Despite the rules, we find that there zs an ongoing
problem wuh RV parking. We have always appreciated knowing that the City. of
Temecula also had rules regarding RV parking and that we could call on Code
Enforcement for support whenever our own effotns at enforcement became too time
consuming. Unfortunately, our process can take several months before a lawsuit can be
filed.
We would like to urge the city council to continue to enforce Temccula's existing
laws regarcimg RV parking and storage. If there is a problem with caseloads, perhaps a
pan-time employee can be hired for this specific job. Alternatively, the law cotfid be
enforced when cases were reported to Code Enforcement. Either way, I am sure that the
majority of Temecula's citizens, including those that do not have the benefit of an active
homeowners association would appreciate this.
Sincerely,
Martha HeWera - x~. Joann Lamb
Vice -President Secretary.
Helen Cappelli':ff/';~ y~ a"~
Treasurer
3 February 1997
City Council
City of Temecula
cYo Temecula City Hall
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
FEB 0 4 1998
::.'4'i ¥
Re: Parking of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Areas
Note: As used in our letter, "RV" includes U'afters, boats, c~mpers, and
recreational vehicles of all kinds.
As you are aware, last-night the city Planning Commission voted to continue
the present code provisions concermng the subject vehicles.
Almost unanimously the audience in attendance (and there were many)
indicated their preference to continue the present code. Council member
Comerchero, who was present at the meeting, can attest to that. All four
commissioners present also indicated their interest in continuing the code.
Many of the commissioners indicated an interest in not only continuing the
code, but actually strengthening it, specifically in the areas of fi~es and length
of time allowed for temporary parking. Additionally, one commissioner
indicat~cl an interest in adding provisions concerning on-street parking of those
vehicles. (AS you know, the present code addresses parking of subject vehicles
on private property, but does not address parking of the vehicles on the city
streets. )
We wish to endorse those attitudes and provide the following rationale:
Fines and the Fine Structure: One commissioner asked if fines levied
against violators of the code could be a way of mitigating the added cost of
additional Code Enforcement personnel. A representative of Code
Enforcement answered. indicating that it could, indeed, be a way of recovering
some of the expense. But, he cautioned, Code Enforcement uses fines "very
sparingly". We ~vonder why i'mes are used sparingly. If the city wishes to stop
violations it must enforce the code and fine violators. We can support an initial
warning to violators, even though they have a responsibility to both
themselves and their neighbors to know the law -- but thereafter we believe
that increasingly sever fines must be levied against repeat offenders. It is only
through continued enforcement pressure that violations will be reduced. And
Temecula can certainly afford to hire additional Code Enforcement personnel
as it ~'ows.
.Length of Time for Temporary Parking: Most commissioners would
support a reduction in time allowed for temporary parking. Indeed, one would
have totally eliminated any overnight parking. We believe that it is reasonable
that some time be allowed for temporary parking. But washing and/or cleaning
of the vehicle, boat, etc. should not take even 24 hours, and we believe that
maintenance shouldn't be performed in the neighborhoods. Stocking of RVs,
etc. for trips certainly doesn't take more than a few hours. So we support a
time limit of 12 hours for temporary parking. We would, however, exempt
visitors with RVs from the 12 hour limit.
Parking of RVs on City Streets: Currently, on-street parking is
regulated by the State Vehicle Code, and enforced by the Police Depm-tment.
The problem is with people who wish to circumvent the code by simply moving
their vehicle before the 72 hour limit is exceeded. Some~mes this is done by
moving the vehicle to an adjacent street, other times by just driving around the
block and parking again near the original spot. In any case the owner is using
a loophole in the code to counter the intent of the code; namely to prevent long
term use of the streets for the parking of RVs. At one time, in ano~er city, we
had a neighbor who parked his tar roofing truck in front of our home: not the
most attractive curb appeal we wanted -- or you would want. We support a
change in the code that would track and fine persons using the 72 hour
loophole. Additionally, we support a widening of a new code to include business
vehicles, nuisance vehicles (old, rusted, or unused), and RVs.
A question was posed by a commissioner as to how much it costs RV owners to
store their RVs in approved storage facilities. The answer was approximately
$250 per 6 months. We believe that this is not an issue for Council
consideration however. When you buy an RV you ass~me responsibilities, one
of which is to abide by the codes in force where you live, another is to accept
the costs of such ownership -- including the cost of its proper storage.
Our concerns are driven by. our desire to protect our property values, the
beauty of our neighborhoods, and the beauty of Temecula in general. Unless
the City establishes a firm policy in regards to RVs and commercial vehicles
the problem will only be exacerbated as our population grows. A street littered
with RVs, and/or nuisance vehicles. and/or commercial vehicles is not an
attractive street. Please strengthen the code and publish frequent reminders
that Temecula will not tolerate offenses to the code.
We appreciate your consideration of these items as you deliberate on the issue.
Sincerely,
3223, Placer/Belair
Temecula, CA
693-0929
CC:
The Californian
Mr. Bill Gray
Mr. Bob House, President, Chardonnay Hills HOA
From:
To~
Date:
Subject:
Richard Sarraffe <richsar@iname.com>
TEMECITY.TEMECULA(HOTLINE)
1/30/98 4:54pm
RV Parking in Temecula
G. Thornhil
R. Bradley
To: Temecula City Council
I understand that the Temecula City Council will soon be
reviewing it's
position regarding the parking of RVs and Campers on city streets
within a
residential area.
I strongly urge that the city take some initiative in prohibiting
residents
from parking their RVs on residential streets. There needs to be
some means
of code enforcement so that private Homeowners associations can
deal with
the problem if the city does not. As a committee member of the
Villa
Avanti HOA, here in Temecula, it seems that we are powerless to
keep our
community free of the unsightly parking of these vehicles becau~
the
streets belong to the city. We have some residents who
continually play
the game of moving their RV six inches every 72 hours so that
they comply
with the city law.
I know that you, as a council, are committed to keeping our city
attractive
and I urge you to give this matter some real thought and help the
Homeowners Associations to legally deal with blatant violations
of this
nature.
Thank you,
Richard Sarraffe
Tel. (909) 694-3459
Richard Sarraffe
mailto:richsar@iname.com
;c: ~. Thornhill
2 December 1997
Linda Fahey
Chairwoman, Temecula Planning Commission
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Ms Fahey:
At the 1 December meeting of the Temecula Planrang Commission discussion
pertaining to a section of the City's Development Code was "continued off
calendar". That section has ~o do with storage of recreational vehicles in
residential areas. A review of the documents provided to the public at that
meeting indicates some Planning Commission and/or st~ff confusion regarding
the subject.
- The December 1 agenda provided to the public provides the following
regarding this subject:
"Proposal: Re, peal Section 17.94(D)(1)ff) of the City*s
Development Code Pertaining to Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage in
Residential Areas"
- A memorandum to the Planning Commission from Debbie Ubnoske,
Planning Manager provides the following concerning the same subject:
Subject: Planning Application No. PA97.0349. Amendment
to Section 17.24.020fD)(1)(/) of the City's Development Code Pertaining to
Recreatmnal Vehicle ~RV) Storage in Residential Areas"
Ms Ubnoske -- in her "Background" section of the memo states
that "The City Council originally directed staff to amenrt Section ..............."
The subject was titled "Repeal" at the 3 November Planning Commission
meeting -- now it appears that a decision has been made without public notice
to modify the original subject to one of "Amendment". Further, the section of
the Development Code cited is different. Did we miss notification by the
Planning Commission that the original subject had been changed? Has it been
changed? Was the original subject in error? Is the staff in error?
The public has a right to accurate information concerning proposed changes: if
for no other reason than to be able to respond intelligently to those proposals.
Response to a proposed ~ is very. different from that for an ~mendrnent.
In regards the same subject -- but with a different focus:
When several people show up at a meeting of the Planrang Commission
anticipating a discussion of a topic and are then notified that the subject is
being "continued off calendar" it can -- it does -- make those people suspicious
of the reason(s) for the continuance. For example:
- Is the Plaxming Commission just waiting for people to lose interest so
that they can do what they want without being m the spotlight of public
pressure?
- Are members of the Commission or their staff predisposed to repeal or
amend the section regardless of public opimon?
- Is pressure being exerted by the City Council?
I don't accuse either the City Council or the Commission or its staff of any of
these motives. I only list them as ways the public can -- and often does -- think
about their government. I would like'to think that the reason ['or the
continuance has to do with an overworked staff who just haven't have enough
time to complete their task
Might I suggest that some explanation to the public is warranted when a
subject is "Continued off calendar"? There is a lot of public suspicion of
government today, both locally and nation wide. You could help reduce that
suspic/on in Temecula by the s/mple act of prov/ding a rational explanation of
the reasons.'
A copy of my original letter to the City Council and the Planning Commission is
included. I wish to ensure that my v~ews as a citizen of Temecula are
considered when the subject is again considered.
Sincerely,
Temecula, CA 92592
693-0929
Enclosure°
cc: ~emecula City Council
The Califorman
Edward V. and Evelyn D. Salirore
42733 San Julian Place
Temecula, Ca 92592
December 1, 1997
Honorable Councilman,£arel Lindermans
Ciry of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, Ca 92589-9033
ec: Gary Thornhill
RE: CITY OF TEMECULA PARKING REGULATIONS OF MOTOR HOMES,TRAILERS
BOATS
Dear Councilman Lindermans:
We purchased our Lake Village home in 1973,che year Lake Village was founded.
In chose early days beforethe Incorporation,Lake Villase was a quiet,laid-back.
slow-movlng off the beaten path community. The ideal setting that my wife Evelyn
and myself were looking for upon our retirement from the exciting and fast moving
life-style demanded by our ownership and administrative involvement in News-
paper and Text book publishing business in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Upon our retirement in 1978, we made the BIG MOVE to our small Rancho Calif.
(Lake Village) retirement home,worlds away we thought then,from the hectlc,
never ending "Rat Race" of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Durlng most of our almost 20 Fears of living here in Lake Village, we have owned
and parked our Motor Home in our driveway, without problems.
We heartily disagree with the 30HNNY COME LATELY DISGRUNTLED DISSIDENTS,that our
t'lotor Home is a blight and eyesore to our neighborhood.
However,we would gladly park it behind our fence 1~ it were possible to do so.
unfortunately our lot is sltuaced in such a way that it is impossible to park it
behind our fence.
We have a large investment in our Motor Home which is kept in excellent condition
at all times and is considered as one of our most cherished possessions. It is
furnished,packed and "ready to go" on short notice, which we take advantage of
quite often for weeks and months at a time.
Any thought of driving it to a storage lot. even if one were close by, between
trips and subjecting our Motor Home to burglaries, and vandalism is entirely out
of the question.
-more-
Temecula City Councilman
IN CONCLUSION --FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
-2-
Ed & Evie Salitore
1)Motor Homes,trailers,boats, and recreational vehicles should be allowed :o
be parked on driveways, when it is not feasible or possible to park them
behind the fenced or screened area o£ such property.
2) Most owners of Recrea:ional vehicles are honest,law-abiding ,tax pay:ng
c~v~c m~nded citizens and a credit to our Community.
3) JOHNNY COME LATELY DISSIDENTS should not be encouraged in :heir unjust and
unwarranted self serving demands against all owners of Recreational Vehicles.
They knew what the conditions were relative to the policy of the City of
Temecula ,on Recreational Vehicles at the time they made the decision to move
here.
~here flagrant abuse of reasonable regulations exlSt, the parties responsible
for :he abuse should be held responsible.
In closing we are really happy :o let you know we voted for you and have been
strong supporters of the actions and efforts of our City Council,including,and
ever since Incorporation.
Thanking you in advance for your kind indulgence, and it is our fervent hope nh
you and all your loved ones are blessed with a Happy, Healthy,and better than e
coming Holiday Season and New Year. '
Sincerely,
Ed an~ Eyre Sailtore 7'-
42733 San Julian Pl.(Lake Village)
7emecula, Ca 92592
Phone: ¢~09) 676-6355
ENCL:
CO:
Photograph enclosed showing our Motor Home as Zt is parked in
our driveway. ,
Council Members
Birdsall
Cormerchero
Ford
'Lindemens
Roberts
$~one
Plannzng Comm.
Fahey
November '-, 'paw
TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE
TEMECULA PLANNING COMM ¢:
I~.ION:
This is one more concerned citizen's appeal to
PLEASE. PLEASE retain and enforce the C£ty's Develop-
ment Code ~ertaining to recreational vehicle storage
Ln residential areas, and iilegai parking on City s~ree~s.
m!ease help the majority of the citizens,wno love
Temecula, to maintain anO enhance this beaUTIFUL CITY.
It will invite responsible growtn and pride of owner-
sniD. Street ciutter and ugliness of RVs parked on
streets and in yards, add to deterioration of neignbor-
nodas. Promerry values decrease. Citizens who eniov
Living i~ ~e$1_~$E~ainea, Oeau~iful neighborhoods.
wit~ pride of ownersnip, will move out, and those who
do not care :ill move in. Home values will nit rock
bottom in these Dligntea neighborhoods.
The appeal of 3on'n Lynn, published November 13th in the
Californian contains many points of concern, wnicn we
snare. The foliowind mortion of his ampea!, Dears
re~eating:
"Thiro: Dther.ri:ies csn and Go enforce
same cr s/miiar parxing regulations. Temecula
can ei~her neip maintain the beauty of the
neighOornooos or remove the code and contribute to
their deterioration."
Thank YOU for .:onsiderino our concerns.
MRS. MARIE mUNN
30156 La Primavera, Temecula
Phone: 676-~059
November 15, 1997
NOV 2 0 199,;
r?lTv
Mr. Ron Bradley
Ci.ty Manager
City of Tcmccula
43174 Business Park Dave
Tcmccula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Bradley:
The issue of Recreauonai Vehicles (Campers. Boats, Trailers, Fifth Wheels, and Motor Homes) in
our resideanal area :s of concern to me.
On Villa Aimms Drive, where I live, there is a P, ccreatsonaJ Vehicle parked in a driveway on blocks
to keep :t level -- as it is being used as an extra bedroom! Just a few houses beyond the'mobile
bedchamber, a welding business is operating out of the gar'~ge, and unsightly old cars are being
worked on in the street and driveway.' This was once a lovely neighborhood in a beautiful city, but is
now just one of many Temccula streets that is beginrang to l~ok run down and ragged.
I want to see the City Code enforced. but the existing laws don't appear to be clear or enforceable, as
written. Perhaps the vehicle code governing residentzal parking needs to be rewnt~n so that st is
CLE~R.-bVD PRECISE and cax'rtcs a HEF'/~'.~,tOhrET..IRY ?ENALTT'; one STRONG ENOUGH to deter violators.
Let's strive to keep The City ofTcmccuia a c:ty we can all bc proud
Sincerely yours.
/
Marcia Watkins
4 November 1997
Whom It May Concern
City of Temecula
~.~$'} Y IV~.~,,.,,L~.'~.
· Re: At~ached Letter
We request that copies of the enclosed letter be provided to each member of
the City Council and Planning Commission before their next meetings on this
subject.
~ Joim -,yrm
4 November 1997
Temecula City Council and
Temecula Plattrang Commission
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Re: Repeal of Section 17.24(D)( 1 }(f) of the City's Development Code Pertaining
to Recreational Vehicle Storage in Residential Areas
At a 3 November meeting of the Temecula Plarming Comm~ ssion the
referenced agenda item was withdrawn from consideration pending further
study of the issue. However, before moving on to the next agenda item, the
Planning Commission provided opportunity for the public to voice concerns
about the proposed repeal.
We would like to comment, in greater detail than the three w. mute Commission
hmit allows, on two issues raised during the public responses.
Enforcement: Three comments here. First: Commissioner Guerriero
asked about numbers of personnel needed to enforce the code. Why has the
code not been forcefully enforced to date? Had it been enforced with vigor the
number of personnel needed at this time would not be significant. Residents
would have been made aware of the inconveniences involved in violaring the
code. Initial vigorous enforcement activities at this time might require
additional personnel to be used. but a lower level would ult~nately be required.
The code enforcement must include significant penalties. Some people have to
be hit over the head with a 2 x 4 to get their attention.
Second: One speaker from a Homeowner's Association noted that asking the
HOAs to enforce parking regulations pits neighbor against neighbor, leacling to
neighborhood feuds and hatred. He suggested that the City is the better
regulatory agency. Comment: Our experience in 3 HOAs over the last 16
years is that the speaker is right. Asking the HOAs to enforce pro'king
regulations on city owned streets can lead to feuds. anger, and, in extreme
cases -- violence. The city owns the streets. The city has an enforceable code
on the books. The city should enforce it. Without that enforcement the HOAS
are forced into long, expensive, and sometimes losing legal battles with people
who have little regard for their neighbors, their neighborhood, or property
values. "Curb appeal" is a significant factor in home re-sale. A cluttered
neighborhood reduces curb appeal.
Third. Other cities can and do enforce the same or similar parking regulations.
Temecula can either help maintain the beauty of its neighborhoods or remove
the code and contribute to their deterioration~
RV. 1Ro~t.~. Eta..qtnr~oe: We note that an agenda report concerning
this item s~ates that the City's Code Enforcement Officers "have met with
resistance from property owners who have no where else to store their trailers,
RVs, and boats. However, the City ts currently processing several applications
for self storage focilitt~s. These are expected to provide additional storage
oppo~unities." Comment: Are the majority of City residents to be penalized
because some residents will not accept their responsibilities as citizens of
Temecula and (where they live in HOA~) members o/'HOAs? Ignorance of the
law has never been a legal defense. People with RVs, Wailers, boats, tanks,
giant earth movers, tar roofing trucks, elephants, and Siberian Yaks have a
responsibility that we all share -- to conform to all established laws, codes,
rules and regulations-- whether they like them or not.
We appreciate your consideration of these items as you move to
reconsiderarion of this issue. We urge retenlion of the code -- and its vigorous
enforcement.
Sincerely,
322:~7 Placer Belair
Temecula, CA 92592
693-0929
cc: The Californian
R. Bradle.~
G. ThornhEll
October 24. 1997
Temecula City Council
OCT 2 ~ 199/
Dear Council:
We have lived in Temecula for eight years and are proud to say there is very. little to
complain about. Our City Council listens and acts for all our behalf. In today's politics.
this is unusual and appreciated.
The issue of RV and boat parking m our residential areas is of concern to us for two
reasons: (I) If our City Council can elect to not enforce the Codes of Record what other
laws and codes can they elect to not enforce7 f2) With the "announcement" that this
code will not be enforced. we have in effect given an open invitation for more of what is
already a blight on our neighborhoods. Many times the paricing of RV's and boaIs on the
driveways necessitates excessive automobile parking in the streets or cul-de-sacs.
Policing is not a problem ff the fine for infi'action is high enough and well published. A
$500.00 per day fine will clean up what is beginning to look like a resort parking lot
throughout our beautiful city..
M.r. Roberts and Ms. Birdsell must start looking around more and listen to the electorate.
This citv is larger than just Meadowview!
We applaud the efforts of Mr. Stone and Mr. Linderman who on all issues have the pulse
of our entire commumry. Mr. Ford. you will do well to follow their examples. We urge
all of you to reconsider this issue and perform the job you were elected to do. Please obey
and enforce our laws: they are there for a good reason and it is not your job to excuse
them.
~---$~cerely.
Betty Jo Porter
40221 Tuolomne Court
9091699.6968
VIA FAX
20 October 1997
TO: City Counct] Iqembers
Ctty of Temecula
SUBJECT: Chapter 17.24 of Development Code - Section 17.24.020
Off-Street Parklng and Loadlng
Hy name ts Joanne Phillips and [ restde, with RY husband, Oliver at
30361 Tradewater Ct. in the City of Temecula.
The City Count11 has had various discussions recently regarding Off-
Street Parking, and more specifically as pertains to RVs, boats, etc..
Back on 6 August 1997 ! sent a FAX (copy attached) to Ms. Cindy Ke(rsey
Code Enforcement Officer, for the C~ty of Temecula - regarding a
violation of the subject Code, Section 17.24.0Z0. This specifically
~resses. t~e f~ct of motorhmms parking on the street le all
o ray perled and then be1 g y for a
street and berne ~ ng able to move it to the other side of the
= a..e again to leave i: there for another S days, etc.
Zt is hard for me to understand how thts can be all !
beautiful city and you, a- .m~ ........... owed We have a
--- . _ a ,,,emuers or :he Git Gounctl, are allow~nq
cnls type or unstqhtl¥ thtngs to occur. HO~ ~A~ TH~S BE??????
~e are members of the The Vt!1ages Home C)~ners Association group and
our CC&Rs restrtct overnight parking tn the streets - heNever, tt can-
not be enforce BECAUSE THE CZTY OF TEHECULA ZS NOT ~ZLLZNG TO BACK US
UP. ~e, too,have a motor home - it is parked behtnd gates (legally
according to our CC&Rs) because we believe In following the rules -
! kno~ rules are made to be broken - but that is not how it should be.
Zf ~e leave our motorhome out parked tn our driveway for a day
whtle we are gerttrig ready to go on a trtp or are cleaning/washing
same and the homerdriers association comes by and sees it there, we are
~mmedlately notified to move same - and It's on our own propertyl
! believe tt ~s about ttme that our City Council look out for the vast
majority of the citizens of this great city and decide to put a law Into
affect that disallews overnight parktng or continuous parking of motor-
hemes. boats. big trucks, etc. on our streets.
PLEASE TAKE NECESSARY ACTZOM TO STOP* TH!S TYPE OF TH~NG FROM RU~N~NG OUR
CZTY A)iO CAUSLNG PROPERTY VALUE TO GO OONN TO SAY NOTHZ~G OF T~E FACT
THAT !T LOOKS ABSOLUTELY TERRZBLE - iF ~E NANTEO TO L!VE L~KE TRASH
NE SURE I~OULON'T HAyE FIOVED HERE.
SZ~CERELY,
PHZLLZPS
(576.4466)
TEMECULA CITY MANAGER AND
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
We thank the board members for hearing our plea on Monday
evening November 3rd, to stop permanent parking of RV'S
and boats on driveways, lawns and streets in residential
areas.
City Council members Mr. Stone, Lindermans and Roberts were
not aware of the seriousness of this problem until they
came to our neighborhoods. In fairness to yourself and us
homeowner taxpayers, I urge you to give just 30 minutes of
your time and persoally come out and see what has happened
to this beautiful city. I recommend you drive the following
streets; Calle Medusa, Chauncey Way, Yardley Ct., Wellington
Circle and the worst of all Windsor Road.
The answer to this problem is not Home Owners Associations
Its evident that HOA can ·
not enforce this unless the city
invokes and enforces an ordinance to prohibit this sort of
thing --_ and please realize that about one third of the
developments in our city do not
have HOA,S. The California
vehicle code governing residential street
workin · . parking is not
_ _g.. Also, nxether ~s development cod
ana cnap=er 10.32. They w~11 never work e chapter 17.24
until rewritten.
The penalty must be stronger than "Violation of any
provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
infraction". We suggest it read "Violation of any provision
of this subsection shall be given a three day notice to
correct the infraction or be fined $100.00 per day until
corrected. After the third day the owner will be cited and
fined at rate of $100.00 per day until the infraction is
corrected. The vehicle, trailer, RV, boat etc may be
impounded at the cities descretion and the fine shall
continue until claimed and fine is paid."
It should be published in all local newspapers that this
ordinance would become effective in 30 days.
Please help us keep this city beautiful.
CDRRESPONDENCE RECEIVED PRIOR TO APRIL 21, 1998 WORKSHOP
.~.i'-" ','Z?,'_" U"r'A.:i-Y .4.~CV? .42.1. ~E E ¥. '$ A'J2 BC:AT£ -"~.~,~, F.4-RKED ,... " ''7.1~7.-'
- · " ........ .~ T. 7E ~ _ .
z~-..-~-z :.~a~ .... ~','..~-~'.~::~'lv THiN'ES I:; 'THEIR DRIVE WaYS .~':D GET A~';Y
',';i'_-¥ i_-.i."[£?.E fEE ~ARKS ,ZU? ..-.~:,~_' ;;.YER'". "~ '-' .~A:.i RE]7? ~:,-iSES YE'R
2 .... '-v X B/AUTiTULL A.:.EA =o -~,'-JCi. U.iiiTG A JUL'i[ Y.4_RL. ,,~- ::~,~ ::C ASSC.i.'-_i.iiT
-:--.~. :*'-~ ~'X'/i 33&R'S ~-U~ Z:,'. .~iiE 12FiRSEE ?HEM WE
- ~"'~ .... -~ ..... R ;'~2"ETi.~,o CN iV. AT 6UF. C? YCUR MEETINGS '~='~ iiiY kA:iTED
~' S~-- --~'HN~T'~' ~"="; =~ ...... ~ .... M ~ ~ARK ,-i, CU~ STREETS
i. CCKiZ.3 .4." S~Z-"Ci'~'~ ELSES %',kECK "u= ,n~.,;a. NOT ALL .r~CTCR HCNES ARE
-_F.,~ CF THZK .-,E.--' JUiCL'-iS, S ALSo,:";,' '"~ ~,:r:- ~.~- . ,.__
..... ~.= .~(.UT .... C.4.r.~/,R SHELLS T_..-.c =E.Z.
HAV£ _--~_RKED El; '-'-HEIR u.'~.~vE','/AYS? ZHiS iS A GiSGRACE. CE,.',:ECULA IS
---: "--iZULi .-,,,m ,,= DC3?'
~'~ = ,,~: ..... :r,, i:~T~. --,..~Tz:,,~ ?ERRiS.THAT'S -~ ."':ESS.
S~:'i:':~i~,;C- 3L'--'i--R ~_' D, NZ R=ALLY S6CN ~EFC?.E IT'S TLC LATE.
','.'-'-. ---:.lie =-----v Do~D ~:'~'- '
-,, ....C$ CUR ~F~ -:~'
~P-',,-Y, ~ S EEAU~iFi'L! .',:n .rAiD
· ' 'JR H ;(_._.-..~'.~= JU~U(EitS ~SZ LC'WERi'.;3 TF."Z VALUE CF LUll PRSPE?,_-Y.WE
AR-- K_=Aiiy .......... : ''T 3.4.:; iT T ..... .-- ..~.a.Z.~ "~
:':-'--~ -'~- -~ ......... :';X,.: Y, US >:EETIZi- , ,' - ', · ', '-'=---
;; iT':-- F(-~AY_-iT'- = W=_._ 7 .... --"== v '~' , ..........
....... .-- ........... .~.. ,. W H'-' ,,' ;, c FEEL .4.3,. iJ'.
--.'-'iZ .:YET _-" '.,S._ '¥;E L, MiSS i.:'.'Z ',', ':iK S:.-vjF.
'.'.'Z . i '/Z '" ..,..,F.S 77 FE !'"; _.:= f~'-;'~A:7!' ' 5 A~ ..,,~ 'i .o --"DZE;i :(E.-,.D"W ~ D.',.'F'T.,?
--.=.. --= i-u 2:73 1'r Vii."'7{ iS SC:.'T':T"E- _"iS 'z.Y = m ,;- ,-, =,
'J.YE~K T-, ~-~. -'-R ~"-URSE/VES ASK -%L,-L THE };EI:SH30RS A~..~CUT IT
THANK YCU
DEER ?.?EAD£,,W RD.
~" -"~'~ '- ' C;.,i.
April 4,1998
:Mr. M. Fagen
Ass. Plarming Commissioner
City of Temecula
Dear Sir,
I would like to address the new street parking regulations you and your group plan to
discuss on Tuesday April 21.
Having served on "The Villages H.O.Assoc. Board" in various capacities and am currently
the president of this board, I certainly know how difficult it is to enforce the C.C&R's as
well as any laws or regulation"s.
Commercial vehiciles, boats.campers.large motor homes as well as simi-tractor trailers
certainly do not enhance either our residential or commercial street. It is my
understanding that vehicles of this nature are simply cited by our police depi..with a 72
hour notice to remove. What happens is the owner of the vehicle moves them within the
allotted time frame across the street or down the block. A solution for this on going
problem might be as follows.
Issue permits by mail or in person for a day or two to load or unload these vehicles or for
out of town visitors. To cover any expense for issuance could be $5.00. These permits
would have to be attached on the vehicles windshield with an expiration date clearly
visible. Traffic tickets and fines would be issued on the expiration date. No more
"Warning Citations" of 24 or 72 hours.
Lets not move Vehicles across the street but out Of the residential neighborhood to insure
a pleasing sig, ht and also improve the safety of our streets.
Additionally large simi-truck-trailors should be illegal on any residential street at any
time, with the exception of residential moving vans for home owners goods pick ups or
delivery.. ~
I do hope to attend you work shop and am grateful the city is taking a real' interest in this
ongoing problem.
IV~'s. M.C.Sawyer
Ternecula
Norman Taylor
30048 Via Velez Place
Temecula, CA 92592
Subject: Parking/Storage of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones
Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members:
Recently the Temecula City Council agreed to give the so-called "pioneer
businesses" a break worth a million dollars or more. Why not give RV'rs a
break at no cost. We bought and brought our RV's here to Temecula long
before the city proposed this new unfair ruling on RV's. We RV'rs agree to have
them removed from our city streets. To make us remove them from our own
property and driveways is absurd.
I want to give you an example of how pathetic this whole situation is.
an official complaint to the city that a train caboose is sitting over in a
neighborhood and I think it is an eyesore to My City?
Can I file
Sincerely,
Norman Taylor
10 April 1998
City Council and Planning Commission
City of Temecula
c/o Temecula City Hall
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: The RV Problem
A prior out-of-state commitment prevents me from attending the
joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop on the RV problem.
Since I cannot be there to express my views I am enclosing a copy of
my letter to the City Council, dated 19 March. Please give it the same
attention you would if I were there to express it in person.
Sincerely,
Job
32237 Placer Belair
Temecula, CA 92592
693.0929
e-mail: j&jshow@vmicro.com
cc: Mr. Bill Gray
Enclosure: My letter to the City Council of 19 March 1998
19 March 1998
City Council
City of Temecula
c/o Temecula City Hall
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: The RV Problem
RV owner Ed Salitore has recently been quoted in the newspapers
expressing his concerns on the subject "problem". We would like to
again present an opposing view.
· Temecula has an ordinance concerning parking of RVs, boats,
etc. If you live here you should obey the local ordinances. And.
Councilmember Ford, enforcement of the ordinance doesn't imply
that we're a "trailer police" city anymore than enforcement of speed
limits means that we're a "speed limit police" city. Enforcement of
city ordinances helps maintain the attractiveness of our
neighborhoods and the city in general. We have ordinances because
some people aren't considerate. That's sad, but very true. For an
ordinance to be effective it must be enforced. We do not understand
why the city has suspended enforcement of the ordinance until the
matter is resolved. The ordinance is on the books. It should be
enforced. The longer it goes unenforced the more RV owners will
believe that they have a right to ignore it.
· We agree that RV owners need to be able to load and unload
their vehicles, along with limited servicing. But 5 days parking in
front of private residences encourages people to violate the intent of
the ordinance. Why should loading, unloading or limited servicing
take 5 days? And some RV owners now move to the street after 5
days. Then -- '
· Many RV, etc. owners get around the 72 hour street parking
time limit by moving their RVs, etc. to another location before they
are ticketed; then leaving it there for a few days before moving
again. This defies the intent of this ordinance, which is to prevent
long term storage of RVs, etc. in our. neighborhoods. That's tacky.
That situation should be corrected. Owners need to be able to load
and unload their vehicles, along with limited servicing. Why should
that take more than 12 hours? -- if even that? Five days parking in
front of private residences again encourages people to violate the
ordinance.
· Mr. Salitore has to pay fees to his homeowners association for
parking his vehicle in that association? That's between tiim and his
association. He should have read the CC&Rs before deciding to live
there or acquire an RV. Has he ever heard of a concept called
accepting responsibility for his own actions? Has he ever heard of a
concept called being informed?
In a city we all live close to one another. The unfortunate fact is that
what you and I do on and around our property impacts our
neighbo- .nd neighborhoods. The RV owner has rights? Sure. but
they also have responsibilities, including care for their neighbors,
neighborhood, and property values -- theirs and ours. Sometimes we
all have to subordinate our own rights to those of the community.
The city can help the owners of RVs by trying to attract more RV
storage business to the city and giving them "fast track" approval.
Heavy emphasis on security should help ease the fears of the RV
owners.
Sincerely,
~o~h.' Lynn
32237 Pllicer' Belair
Temecula. CA 92592
693.0929
e-mail-j&jshow@vmicro.com
cc: Mr. Bill Gray
The same E-mail was sent to all CouncilmeWoers
From: "Chuck Hankley" <hankley@vmicro. com>
To: TEMECITY. TEMECULA (ROBERTSR)
Date: 3/18/98 12: 40pm
Subject: R.V. Parking ¢c: R. Bradley
G. Thornhill
To: Mayor of Temecula
From: Charles and Donna Hankley
31745 Via Cordoba
Temecula, 92592 (E-Mail "hankley@alphainfo.com")
re: Recreational Vehicle parking in residential areas.
We are owners of a Recreational Vehicle and strongly feel that
they should not be parked or stored on residential properties for
prolonged periods. They should only be in a residential area,
limiting the time, for maintenance or to prepare for a trip.
Before purchasing our home in Temecula we investigated the
regulations concerning Recreational Vehicle parking, as any
prudent person should. We found the rules compatible with us and
the city*s desire to maintain the ambiance of the city.
We came from a city where Recreational Vehicles were parked every
which way - on private property - on the street - or wherever.
Some were one step from the junk yard. Some were lived in at the
residence for prolonged periods. This was either allowed with no
restrictions or the regulations were overlooked, the area looked
blighted. Particularly as more families acquired these adult
toys.
Please keep this from happening in beautiful Temecula. Don*t let
the residential areas of Temecula become a Recreational Vehicle
yard. We don*t feel that our neighbors should have to share our
Recreational Vehicle desires or tastes by having to stare at our
Recreational Vehicle parked in our driveway.
We are not opposed to Rpcreational Vehicles parked in residential
areas so long as they are completely out of view from the street
or the view of their neighbors. The lot sizes and driveways of
most homes in Temecula are small and are not conducive to parking
large vehicles.
We pay for storage and feel this is the responsibility of the RV
owner. Remember something that would appeal to one can be an
eye-sore to another. To repeat - If you can afford a RV, you
should 5e able to pay for public storage.
Living with the results of relaxed rules would be harder for the
majority of residences to live with than the City*s current
ability to enforce the exiting rules.
Thank You
Charles and Donna Hankley
George ~arshall
31880 Corte Poei~a
Teasouls, California
April 13. 1998
Mathew F~g~n
Accoclare Planner
City of Tomsouls
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula. Ca 925B9-~033
Subject, Par~ing of recreational vehicles - Boats - trailers -
and/or like kind on city streets in residential zones.
Dear ~. l~agan,
In order to establish a more noeltire control over the
harking o5 ~ubJect vehicles on cid2 streets in residential
zones within the city of ~emecula, it is respectfully
requested tha~ a city ordinance be drafted to clearly define
the regulations and limitations under which this practice
will be .~er~itted. This ordinance should include. but not
limited to the following,
P~rking of recreational vehicles. boa~s, trailers, and/or
like kind objects, are limited to a. period of no more than
2~ hours. Owners of vehicles who exceed this ~ime limit
will be subject to a fine of 50.00 dollars for the first
offense and 100.00 dollars for the second offense occuring
within a time frame of 3 years.
In those. ins~ances where a third offense occurs, vehicle
impound action will be taken, and all related'costs,
including, but not limited to. fines and impound fees
must be ~aid by the owner prior to the release of vehicle
~n¥ o lye d.
In certaLn exceptional cases where compliance with the
2~ hour ~ime limitation cannot be me~, such as for
visitors, the homeowner must obtain an "hx~ended ParEing
Per. it' from the city of Temecula for a fee of 50.00
dollars, which allows parking ti~e not xo exceed a
maximum of (?) seven days. This seven day time period
co~ences on the firs~ day the vehicle is in a parked
nosition, and mus~ be ~ositioned in front of the
homeowner's residence, This '~x~ended Parking Permit'
~ay be renewed for one time only for an additional fee of
50.00 dollars.
£LTB-ciBB-60~, TE :~T B66T/£T/I;,G
!. ~B,d -- ,F../.L6 ~69 606, ~uo.~:j .. ~e!,'~:l.l, g&6!. '£L I~,~o~ A.
Apgtt 13, ~1998 11:&1m~-- Fro,
84/13/1998 12:31
· ~ 9173' -- P=;e 2]
35-9173
PAGE 82
Subject ~
Page 2
k~ril 13. 1998
Parking of recreational vehicles - boats -- trailers -
and/or like kind on city s~ree~s in residential zones
In the event the permit time is exceeded. impound action will
be ~aken and all related cost. including. ~ut no~ limited to,
fines and impound fees must be ~aid 1my the owner prior to
release of vehicle involved.
Due to the construction of t~e Metropolitan Water District
Reservoir. s~ecial attention to this sub~Ject merits
particular importance, as a major influx of these types of
vehicles in~o our city is imminent.
In view of the aforementioned comments and suggestions.
perhaps a Ballo~ Initiative for our next General Election
could be develoned, to allow all our eligible
citizenry an opportunity %o partici~ate in ~he final.decision
process of the policy related to this subject.
Your ~romnt action in this matter is appreciated.
($i.~_natorys are members of
the Board of ~he Villa Avanti Sincerely,
an organization re~resenting. .....
"?~ homes.) George ~mrshal¥
Norbert M. Bunt Frances Bunt )ia
co, Council Members - F~3C No. City of Ternsouls: 69~-1999
Jeff Comerchero
Steve Ford
Karl Lindermans
Ron Roberts (Mayor)
Jeff Stone
Linda Fahey (Planning Commission - Chairperson)
NN~, fb
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CITY OF FULLERTON RV STORAGE ORDINANCE
15.17.030. Coudlfiom of permitIed uses.
The foUowin8 qualLficadom. limim~o~. and ctmdi.
Uons shah be applicable ~orhe uses _=_a,,~ri_ '~ in Table
1~.17.020 above. Them shaU be in addition ~o any quali-
fica~o~. LmUuuons. oF condRions s~ fcr~ in r~c u.~
~¢fimueru of Chapte~ I~.CM of ~is Uric:
A. Mu10pk-fam/ly dwcUings ~ i~ciudc coopera-
tively owned apartments and condom~ums;
B. Mobile home parks shaU comply rata tJ~s~ dcvcl-
opmcm ~ included m Section 15.17.13,10 and
Se.~uon 15.I7.050:
C. The ~nm~g of tooms ot the pmv*kting of board.
ca. both. sh,~U be. [inUt~d ~o a total of ea'ee ~ Pet
dwcU. mg turn in R-1. R-IP. R-2 and R-2P zones:
D. ~cessory. I~,it~ngs. sm~cmres. and ~ses pemue~d
in the R- 1. R-IP. R-2 and R-2P zones simll be limi~d to:
1. Privazc garage~.
Teolhouses. wotksh,,a~. amenme. and g~eahous-
· s Cpriva~ and ne~commc~;al),
Park~g and/or sxcrdg¢ of z~:~azion~ ca' ud/it3,
vehicles. motorized. or nonmotorized. is pernutm:l
provided all of the foUo~ing tomtitions ax~ sazis-
Red:
a. Such w. hi¢les stuff no~ be occupied for
hv~g purpose.
b. Such vehicles ~ be !~q~lcd to those
c~mcd by the occupam of the dwelling u,'UL
stored whc~ such padr/ng c~ s',,.~-~e shaU
conrotate a cleat and demonsubic vchicu~
traffic h,,~'d. or be a ttu-t~ w pubBc hea~u~
^ te:tca~onaJ vehicle shall no[ bc paticed
s~oted ~ithin ~he born ym'd whct~ u~ L~
a~ ¢x.tstU~g driveway ot other access
to the rca~ ya,'d of the teedonce thaz can
accommoda~ such ve.~cle.
parallel to ~h¢ from IxopmY line is
pmhibimd e~ce~ where a curved er c~uLar
dfi~u. uy exL~. In ~hose cases. sutuble
sczeening of u~¢ ~'caaonal vettitle shaU be
swmunmg -p~.~l~. remus cora's. cabaret. and
mmLL~ te.~'~a~on ~n~!iues for the so~ ~ of the
oco_~t~ of t~¢ l:~emLsgs and they {ue~.
vialed ~ such faciLiU~ shall not occupy any
portion of a tequ. a'gd fi'o~ yazd and ate stubbly
scteeaed from adjacent Froix:me.s:
£. Priv-ag park/rig a~.as shaU co~fctm to me fol-
lowing cond~io~s:
Such ~ shah be ~nptoved and maintained m
accordance Mth the provisions of Secucm
15.,~.150 of It~ Uric. except tha~ the P. XlUa~
fi.fieer~-foot sin:back f~orn any street ma.U be land-
scaped in its rarity and not ~s ~han five pcr-
ce~t of the temair~ of the parking ar~ shall
Alon{ any co~uncm boundary ~ith property zoned
R-I or R-IP. · sLyfoot hiih omamennd nmmm-y
w-~l or woodea fcn~ shaU be ptorktex$ and main.
tamed. Where a diffetenuaJ in grade ¢~hms be-
tweea ~ two Frope~es. the heigh~ of the waU
shaU be ~duced one foot for each two fee~ of
~rade di~et~tial. pruvided t~t in no case. except
~thia fir*men feex of the m*eex tine. ~ such
ardJI be less It~ six feet i~ heisht as meresuzuki
f~n th~ commc~:ial side and fony.r~o inches in
Oracle di~fcrenrini shall bc dctm'nUn~d from
build~n~ ~ el~vaz~on. if h:nov, m. arid if not
imow~. G,.,,,, an ~.;.~.-,~ ncu'mai b~iding pad
¢iev'aziee.
AJoa{ any "R' zoa¢ boundary not o~ pro-
tected by a masonry ~ 1ocar, ed on ~e park:~g
1o~ sidg there shaU be instaUed and ~ a
concrete curb or ~nber barrier not less thaa six
mche~ in height and iotaled not less ~an two fcct
eum ~d boundary,
4. No such area sh~U be used for the commer:t~.l
norage of cats. tracks. boazs. or tr~e~.
5. No habitable szructu~:s shaJ. l ¢~st on the pa~cgi
din-rag x= use as a parking area.
15-32
Edward V. & Evelyn D. Salitore
42733 San Julian Place
Temecula, Ca 92592
Honorable ~layor
Ron Roberts
Ci=y of Temecula ,Calif.
Dear ~Iayor Rober=s:
We really appreciate your kind letter of recent date, reco~nizin~
our valid interest in one of the most controversial i~sues facin~
our City Council and the citizens of our outstandin~ City Re:
Parking/' storage o£ Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones.
Along with the valuable and important cooperation of the Good Sam
Club which has a membership close to one million families who own
and enjoy Recreational Vehicles,=he "~4e Love RV's" club of Temecula
has put =o~e~her for the City Council a R.V. Informa=ion Packet
labeled "FOOD FOR THOUGHT" w~ich we hope =he Ci=y Counc11 will take
=he ~ime =o carefully consider for inpu~ ~o include in an R.V.Park-
ing Ordinance free of LegSand Cons=i=u~-.,nal.implicatlons.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT'"
The Planning Co--lesions recommendation ~o= only to endorse re=-
ainlng the existing Ordinance bu= also strengthe~ and vigorousl~
enforce it,co=ally ignores the Parking Rights of Recreational V~hicle
owners, as well as having Legal and Constl=utional implications
There are'2 sides =o =his "Hot" issue,the Recreational Vehicle owners,
and =he antl-RV'ers. Both have inalionable rlghts which mus~ be protected.
An=i RV'ers who base le~iti~a=e pro~'eable claims in a Cour= of Law which
a~verselv a£fec= =he Heai=h,Safe~y,~:~ ~el£are of our Cor~nunz:= have our
complete sympathy,and support. Part~e~ "esponslble for the abuse should
be held accountable,and deal~ with ac:.'~'~inEly.
However we heartily disagree ~ith the '.~i-RV'ers who condemn Recreat-
ional Vehicles as eyesores,Crappy Iook~:~,Property de8raders,etc.These
complaints are illegal and should be dzsregarded."Beau~y is in the eves
of the Beholder". Denying RV'ers ~he privilege and right o£ properly'
parking the~ vehicle~ on their o.wn proper~y is discriminatory.
-more-
~avor Roberts
Salitore's
It is difficult to find a case where an RV properly parked on private
property has resulted in decreased property value. As a rule most Realtors
will point out the fact that RV parking is a plus when property is sold.
Most RV owners have substantial investments in tfmir vehicles and take
pride in them and their homes, to ask them to park elsewhere we feel is
taking away their Rights as property owners.
Please find enclosed 2 letters and copies of other Citles Recreational
Vehicle ordinances which we hope will be helpful in resolvin~ Temeculas'
Recreational Vehicle parkin8 in residential zones.
Sincerely,
Ed and Erie Salitore
Encl.
cc: Council members
Honorable Councilman
City of Temecula
Edward V. & Evelyn D. Salitore
42733 San Julian Place
Temecula, Ca 92592
RE: Tuesday April 21s~ Joint City Council/P!annlng
Co~isslon Workshop--Discussion of Parking/Storage
of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones.
Dear Councilman
Enclosed are copies of other Cities Recreational Vehicle Ordinances,
which we hope will prove helpful to you as well as staff as input
in resolving Temeculas' Recreational Vehicle Parking in Residential
Zones.
Sincerely,
Ed and Ev~-Salitore
Enc!: Response to Mayor Roberts letter dated March 20,1998
re CASE HISTORIES and ORDINANCES FOR:
sno, Ca
Fullerton,Ca
La Mesa,Ca
Misslon Viejo,Ca
Pasadena, Ca
Salinas. Ca
San Bruno,Ca
San Diego,Ca
San Rafael,Ca
£anta Clara,Ca
est Covina,Ca
uclid,Ohio
5trongsville, Ohio
MIKE RAMEY LE/'rER
OHIO, Euclid
One of the most significant
decisions involving RV parking
took place in Euclid. Ohio, m
1977. This was a major victory for
RV owners for t`.vo reasons: the
focus of the case was on aesthetic
values, and the case reached the
U.S. Supreme Court.
Following is a synopsis of the
events that led to this landmark
decision; the text ,.',,as prepared
bv Corinne Shulman. a California
attorne'~: The case is known as
City of ~uctid v. Fitzthum. et al., 48
Ohio App. 2d 297,357 N.E. 2d
402 (1976), cert. denied 429 U.S.
la94, 51 L. Ed. 2d 540 (1977).
~me vears ago, Euclid, Ohio,
,_opted an ordinance that pro-
ribired the parking of "any type
of truck, trailer. auto trailer or
trailer coach" in residential areas.
on either public or private prop-
ertv, unless such unit was
"parked or stored in a completely
closed structure."
In 1974, nine RV owners weru
cited for parking their RVs on
their property, and they and
others banded together in a
determined effort to fight the
ordinance. The matter was tried
at the municipal court level as a
criminal offense and the owners
were found guilt}' and fined.
trial court finding the ordinance
constitutional.
THe RV owners appealed and
',e Ohio Court of Appeals
versed their convictions,
finding the ordinance unconstitu-
tional. It is that decision, made
February 1976, to which we've
reierred vou, for subsequent
petitions bv the City of Euclid,
first to the Ohio Supreme Court
and then to the U.S. Supreme
Court, were both denied and the
opinion of the Ohio Court of
Appeals is now final.
The state appellate court said
that in Ohio, zoning restrictions
for purely aesthetic reasons are
unconstitutional, and that the
ordinance, to be constitutional,
must be a valid exercise of police
power, the power to regulate for
the public health, safety, morals,
and welfare. The court then
stated that:
The vice of the present ordi-
nance is that the record will
support neither an applica-
tion of the ordinance which
bears a substantial, and
therefore reasonable, rela-
tionship to public health,
safety, morals or welfare nor
the imposition of a taxonomic
scheme based on any state
of facts that mav reasonably
justify it. Part of the lack of
reasonableness is exposed
bv evidence of an uneven
regulatory application.
Reviewing the facts illustrated
the "constitutional inadequacies
of the ordinance." The city had
produced testimony to show that
a trailer parked in a driveway
would interfere with access for
fire-fighting equipment, would
~erve as a conduit for fire, was
more difficult to move than a car,
lowered property values, and
under certain circumstances,
could create a safety hazard bv
obstructing the view of street
traffic.
The RV owners had produced
evidence to show that automo-
biles (which were not prohibited
from driveway or street parking)
could be conduits for fire and/or
cause fire hazards and mav be
unsightly when stored outside.
But the state appellate court
properly disregarded this evi-
dence, following a generally rec-
ognized rule of law that it is for
the trier of the fact (here the""
court) to resolve conflicts in
dence. The court then posed and
answered the constitutional ques-
tion:
Where, then, are the Due
Process and Equal Protec-
tion vices of the ordinance?
They lie in the indisputable
fact that enclosing vehicles
classified as trailers does not
change the fire hazard pro-
pensities and it does not
enlarge health safeguards.
Indeed it is clear beyond per-
adventure that enclosure mav
diminish health and safety
factors by trapping sewage
spillage from portable sani-
tarv facilities and collecting
highly flammable escap~-,~
propane gas which w
otherwise be dissipated in ,,e
air. These are factors too
obvious to be resolved on
mere credibility determina-
tions.
CALIFORNIA, Fresno
RVers in the central California
ci,ry of Fresno are attempting to
change a city ordinance that
requires RVs in single-family res-
idental neighborhoods to be
parked and stored in an entirelv
enclosed area or in a rear or side
yard that is enclosed bv a wall or
solid fence not less than five feet
in height.
In addition, the city ordinance
allows for front vard parking for
loading/unloading not to exceed
72 hours in anv month. Even for
RVers who keep their rigs in
storage, the 72-hour-per-month
~imitation is not adequate for
those who use RVs frequently.
Not satisfied with the ordi-
nance, RV owners formed Fresno
RVers for Fair Play and
approached the city about
making changes in RV parking
regulations, but the city refused
to negotiate.
That's when RVers took advan-
tage of the state code that allows
street parking for up to 72 hours
at which time the vehicle must be
moved. Although the citv ordi-
nance prohibited RV parking on
residential streets at any time,
unless adequate signs are posted
advising residents of the restric-
tion, the city could not enforce
the local ordinance. (For a more
thorough explanation of this
code, see Salinas, California, on
pag, e 18.)
RVers who had received tickets
for parking their RVs on the
street challenged the city in
County of Fresno MuniCipal
Court on April 19, 1993 (People v.
Mitchell, No. 473534). The court
ruled that the city ordinance was
valid, but to be enforced, signs
must be posted before tickets can
be issued.
Rather than going to the
expense of posting signs, the citv
changed its street-parking ordi-'
nance to agree with the state
code.
However, RVers would prefer
to have their vehicles on their
private property, and are c~)nti.
uing in their efforts to encourage:
the city to change the existing
ordinance.
CALIFORNIA, Fullerton
EarIv in 1990, the Planning
Commission of Fullerton,
California, recommended an
ordinance that would have pro-
bibired the storage of RVs and
utility vehicles within required
front vard setbacks, including
drivewavs and accesswavs.
According to the terms of the
proposed ordinance, RVs could
be parked on a dust-free surface
behind the front yard setback in
an area having direct access from
a street or alley, but the vehicle
had to be stored perpendicular to
the front property line.
First to speak at the initial
hearing regarding the ordinance
was Gil Gilbert, who was at that
time Good Sam Southern
California State Director. Gilbert
asked for a reasonable use of
property, offering, as examples,
compromise ordinances from two
other California communities. He
also recommended that a citizens'
committee be formed to study the
problem. The commission agreed,
and a committee was organized.
It took approximately one year
of meetings for the task force to
draft and submit an ordinance to
the city, but the wheels of gov-
ernment turn slowly, and it
wasn't until February 1992 that
the citv finally adopted an ordi-
nance that is acceptable to RVers.
RV owners called the ordinance a
victory, anti-RV homeowners
called it a waste of time and a
citv council member called it a
"lesson in civics." In essence, an
ordinance from the 1960s was
revised to be more liberal for RV
owners.
ORDINANCE NO. 2800
AN ORDINANCE OF T} ]E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FULLERTON AMENDING
TITLE 15 OF THE FULLERTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ON-SITE
STORAGE AND PARKING OF RECREATIONAL AND UTILITY VEHICLES IN R-I, R-2 AND
R-2P ZON ES
AMENDMENT A-1368
CITY OF FULLERTON
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FULLERTON HEREBY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1. That Subsection 15.17.030.D.3 of the Fullerton Municipal Code currently reading:
3. Storage of recreational vehicles provided all the following conditions are satisfied.
a. Such stored vehicle shall not occupy any part of a required front yard.
b. Such stored vehicle shall not be occupied for living purposes.
c. Storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant of the dwelling unit.
is herebv amended to read as follows:
3. Parking and/or storage tit recreational or utility vehicles, motorized, or non-motorized,
is permitted provided all of the following conditions are satisfied:
a. Such vehicles shall ,~ot be occupied for living purposes.
b. Such vehicles shall be limited to those owned by the occupant of the dwelling.
c. Recreational Vehicles shall not be parked or stored where such parking or storage
shall constitute a clear and demonstrable vehicular traffic hazard, or be a threat to
public health or safetv.
d. A recreational vehicle shall not be parked or stored within the front vard where
there is an existing drivewav or other access leading to the rear yard of ~he residence
that can accommodate such vehicle.
e. Parking parallel to the front property line is prohibited except where a curved or
circular driveway exists. In those cases, suitable screening of the recreational vehicle
shall be provided~
PASSED BY THE FULLERTON CITY COUNCIL ON February 4, 1992,
SIGNED AND APPROVED ON February 5, 1992.
CALIFORNIA, La Mesa
Back in 1988, Jack Chambers
led Good Samers residing in this
Southern California community
during a successful campaign to
fight anti-RV parking legislation.
However, the situation reared its
ugly head again in 1992. Good
Samer Reed Sauter ,,vent into
action and asked that headquar-
ters send a letter to Art Madrid,
rnavor at that time, asking that he
modif'v his views on RV parking.
ALso monitoring the situation
and offering advice was Mae Jo
Slager who organized RV's
United for Fair Plav in nearby
San Diego, where she had led a
successful campaign against
unfavorable odds (see page 20).
While the La Mesa RV ordi-
nance was being considered,
Ruth Sterling ran for the city
council on a pro-RV ticket and
won her election. After the elec-
tion, the city council bowed to
pressure from RVers and voted
against the anti-RV ordinance. It
was Councilwoman Sterling's
first vote in her new position.
Mayor Madrid, who cast the
only dissenting vote, continued
to argue against the more
lenient bill, and even claimed
that the council's vote was
illegal, but the majority ruled.
RVers in that community hope
that the issue has been resolved
once and for all.
ORDINANCE NO. 2615
AN ORDINANCE REPEALINC CHAPTER 12.51 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE,
RESTRICTED PARKING FOR OVERSIZE VEHICLES AND UNATTACHED TRAILERS
The City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, DOES ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 12.51 of the La Mesa Municipal Code, "Restricted Parking for
Oversize Vehicles and Unattached Trailers," is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk
shall cerutv to tile adoption of this Ordinance and cause ~he same to be published at least once
in the L,? Mesa Forum within 15 davs after its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
La Mesa. California, held the 8tl~ dav of December, 1992 and thereafter PASSED AND
ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said Citv Council held the 12th day of January, 1993.
CALIFORNIA, Mission Viejo
After spending just one night
in their new home in Mission
Viejo, California, Gary and
Sharon Hilde were facing serious
problems from their neighbors.
Although the Hildes knowingly
moved into a planned commu-
nitv with restrictions, prior to
purchasing their home thev took
the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions ICC&Rs), a docu-
ment outlining the standards
established for the neighborhood,
to their attorney and were
assured that their motorhome
would be legally parked. Thev
had selected a home on a comer
lot with ample room for the rig
on one side of the propert):
On the dav the Hildes moved
into their home, they parked
their motorhome on the street
~¥ith the intent to move it onto
the property within a few davs,
but x~'ithin 24 hours. neighbors
complained and called the police,
who ordered the Hildes to
remove the rig from the street
immediateIv. However, even
with the rig legally parked on
their proper .ty, the neighbors con-
tinued their unrelenting assault
on the Hildes with verbal com-
ments and obscene gestures. The
unfriendly neighbors took their
grievance to the homeowners'
association, but the association
board ruled in favor of the
Hildes. saying that thev had not
violated the CC&Rs and had a
right to park their RV on their
property..
When the homeowners' associ-
ation refused to cooperate, the
irate neighbors turned to the citv
of Mission Viejo, requesting thai
the city draft an anti-RV ordi-
nance that would encompass the
entire citv. Citv officials said thev
had no plans to enter into what
thev considered a civil dispute.
but thev did propose an ordi-
nance on the recommendation of
an ad hoc committee, specifying
that the ordinance was not to
replace or supersede CC&Rs in
private communities. The pro-
posed ordinance allowed RV
parking of any size in side yard
provided they were substantial]
screened fror~ view behind a
foot fence. wall or gate, and
allowed RV parking in rear yarc
with a site plan to be approved
bv the director of community
d~velopment. The final ordi-
nance passed by the city counci
affects RV parking in front of re
idences and in drivewavs, but
the most part. it represents a
tory for RV owners.
l~ressure from their neighbor~
was so great that, at one time, tt
Hildes had their home up for
sale, but since thev had done
nothing illegal, thev took their
home off the market and decid(
to stand their ground. Eventual
the neighbors who were causin
the most trouble sold their horr.
and moved awav, and the rest c
the neighbors have relaxed thei
views on the issue. Gary Hilde
said that it took a good year for
the dust to settle, but finally, all
peaceful in the neighborhood.
ORDINANCE NO. 89-28
NUISANCE ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEIO ADDING
CHAPTER 9.04 TO THE MISSION VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO NUISANCE
ABATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 9.04 is hereby added to the Mission Viejo Municipal Code, which shall
read as follows:
9.04.020 Nuisances designated. It shall be unlawful and it is herebv declared to be a public
nuisance for anv person owning, leasing, occupying or having charge of any residential prop-
erty within the City of Mission Vie}o, to maintain such property in such a manner that any of
the following conc{itions are four~d to exist thereon:
(22) Recreational vehicles parked or stored on any street, in the front yard area, or any
other location on the propert.,,' where the recreational vehicles are visible from the neighboring
property or any street. The foregoing applies even if the vehicle or item is used primarily for
some purpose other thnn recreation. Any recreational vehicle without a valid registration or
license is considered to be stored. For the purposes of this section:
a. "Front Yard Area" shall mean the area between the plane of the front elevation of
the main portion of ~ dwelling unit extending to the side property lines and the front property
line abutting the street, including the driveway;
b. "Property Owner" shall mean the legal owner of the residential property;
c. "Owner" shall mean the registered owner of a recreational vehicle and/or other
recreational items, which includes. but shall not be limited to, the property owner,
renter/lessor, and/or other residents or guests residing permanently or temporarily on residen-
tial property;
d. "Recreational Vehicle" shall mean a vehicle, boat, vessel or other type of portable
structure. with or without a mode of power, and without permanent foundation, which can be
towed. hauled. sailed or driven. and is designed primarily for recreational, camping, sailing
and/or travel use. such as, but not limited to, travel trailers, motorhomes, buses converted to
recreational or other non-commercial uses, vans, trucks with or without camper shells,
campers, camping trailers, motorcycles, off-road vehicles, aircraft, boats or other vessels.
(23~ Use of parked or stored recreational vehicles, as defined in Section 9.04.020 (22)(d), as
temporao, or permanent livi,~g space;
9.04.025 Exceptions. Notwithstanding Section 9.04.020, the following shall not constitute a
public nuisance:
(5) Parking of n recreatm,~al vehicle described in Section 9.04.0_0(~_} on
'~ '~'~ the street in front
of the owner's property or in the drivewav thereof, provided the sidewalk is not blocked, while
actively engaged in loading or unloading of said vehicle, but m no event longer than 72 hours;
(6) The legally ¢ontt,rnlttl.~ ,~rtd approved storage or parking of a recreational vehicle
described in Section 9.04.1)20122) in zones or designated planned developmerit areas permitting
such storage or parking, a,~d approved by the City;
(7) The parking or storagt. of recreational vehicles. as described in Section 9.04.020(22), in
the side yard or rear yard of property upon approval of a site plan, provided such vehicles or
items are substantialiv screened from view from any street or neighboring property of the same
or substantmllv similar grade behind a solid six (6) foot high fence/gate or wall and where ade-
quate screening or shrubbery is also provided along the neighboring property line. Boats, ves-
sels or other water craft having a mast must be parked or stored with the mast in a horizontal
positio,~ regardless of location it' the mast is visible from the street or neighboring property. Site
plans under this provisio,~ shall contain a vehicular parking/storage, fencing, wall, gate and
landscape plan. The site plan shall be submitted by the property owner to the Director of
Community Development. who may approve or t{env the plan or refer it to the Planning
Commission at t~is or her discretion. All site plans apivroved under this exception shall contain
a condition that it walls. tenting. gates or landscaping required by the site plan are not main-
tained, fall into disrepair. or are altered or changed without approval, the site plan approval
shall be revoked:
(8) Property ~)~.vl~t,l-s ~)t residential property which, bv its physical characteristics mav
allow the constructi~n~ o~ a completely e,~closed addition t~ the m'ain living structure in tl~e
front area mav apply for a permit to ~uild such an addition for the purpose of parking or
storage ot recreatioual vehicles provided that such addition will not result in any exception to
the zoning laws or require a variance. The addition shall be compatible with the existing main
living structure and shall be designed so recreational vehicles are not visible from the street or
any neighboring property. Site plans under this provision shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for approval;
(9) ValidIv licensed four wheel drive vehicles, pickup trucks without camper shells or
with camper si~elis which do not extend more than one (1) foot above the height of the truck
cab, and vans may be parked in driveways, provided tl~e total height of the top of the vehicle as
measured from the ground does not exceed ten (10) feet, excluding air conditioning units and
vents, and provided no part of the vehicle extends into the sidewalk area. This exception does
not apply to pickup tr~acks with sideboards, storage devices or racks extending more than one
(1) foot above the cab height or to any other recreational vehicle not specifically listed in this
subsection;
(10) Validly licensed four wheel drive vehicles, pickup trucks without camper shells or
with camper shells which do not extend more than one (I) foot above the height of the truck
cab, and vans mav be parked in the street in front of the owner's residence as long as the total
height of the vehicle as measured from the ground does not exceed eight (8) feet in height,
excluding air conditioning units and vents; the width of the vehicle is less than ninety (90)
inches, the length of the vehicle does not exceed twentv-two (22) feet. This exception'does not
apply to pickup trucks with side boards, storage devices or racks extending more than one (1)
foot above the cab height or to any other type of recreational type vehicle not specifically listed
in this subsection.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF June, 1989.
CALIFORNIA, Pasadena
The ciW of Pasadena, California,
is familiar to the thousands of
Good Samers who have enjoyed
taking part in Good Sam's annual
Samboree in conjunction with the
Tournament of Roses Parade
evere New Year's Dav. But while
RVers were enjoying ~amboree
activities, the city was waging a
campaign to completely remove
RVs from private property in that
communitv. The proposed ordi-
nance referred to RVs as "visual
blight." Making the situation
worse was the fact that Jess
Hughston, who was servin,q as
vor of the city at that time.
~ an RV owner and member of
the Good Sam Club, but he sup-
ported the anti-RV ordinance.
Even a letter from Sue Bray,
Executive Director of the ~ood
Sam Club, reminding him ot how
much money is pumped into the
city coffers evere year by Good
Samers and other RVers
attending the Rose Parade, failed
to swav the mayor on the subject.
At tl'~e initial hearing on the
subject, the council delayed lis-
tening to the RVers attending the
meeting until 10 p.m., at which
time only two remained to voice
their objections to the ordinance.
At a subsequent meeting,
about 200 RVers showed up with
20 speaking against the ordinance
while onlv three speakers in favor
of the ordinance addressed the
council. The council showed
signs of backing off on some of
the terms of the ordinance that
referred to motorhomes, but
refused to change their views on
boats and trailers. But all was not
lost; there was to be one more
hearing on the subject.
Again, the RVers showed up en
masse at the council chambers
and pursuaded the council to
revise the ordinance to be more
favorable to RV owners, including
those with boats and trailers.
Because of the excellent organiza-
tion demonstrated by the RV
owners, council members reversed
their views on the subject.
When the issue first came up,
there was a 20-vear-old ordi-
nance on the books that the
council determined needed to be
updated. Members thought they
could quietly and discreetly
change the ordinance with little
fanfare, but some alert RVer saw
the required notice of the in'
to change the ordinance; it v
published in a small newspaper
rather than the city's leading
publication. That got the wheels
turning, and the RVers organized
their winning campaign that
resulted in an ordinance that is
favorable to RV owners.
Mathew Fagan, Assistant City Planner April 14, 1998
Sir:
I understand you are considering restrictions on the parking of
recreational vehicles within the city limits of Temecula.
I live in Meadowview and have my R.V. parked on a cement slab behind
my garage. My lot is completely fenced in accordance with the CCAR's for
Meadowview.
I strongly urge your support in continu/ng to allow property owners
to keep their R.V. 's within the confines of their property.
Sincere Thanks,
Ronald A. Barbeau
29741 Del Rey Rd.
Temecula, CA 92591
CALIFORNIA, Salinas
For 25 years, the city of Salinas,
California, had an ord'inance that
prohibited the parking of RVs
c~ty streets; the ordinance speci-
fied that RVs were to be parked
on private property and screened
from sight.
Few RV owners were aware
that the ordinance existed until
t989, when the city hired a code
enforcement officer who started
issuing tickets to illegally parked
RVs. Most ,,','ere on private prop-
erty, but they were not screened
from s~ght.
A hue and cry from RV owners
-ompted the city to put a tern-
.~rary moratorium on enforcing
the ordinance while a committee
studied the issue, but the com-
promise the city proposed didn't
change anything or improve tile
situation for RV owners...\t tile
time the RV parkin,g issue
erupted, Bob Taylor, a lawyer.
was the only pro-RV mernbcr
the Salinas City Council, but he
did not carry enough clout to
come to the rescue of RV {~wners.
Not satisfied with the citv's
actions, RV owners formed RV
Owners of Salinas and engaged
the services of Taylor, who was
no longer a member of the city
council. The RVers appealed
the council to reconsider tile
issue, but their plea fell on deaf
The RV owners then put thv
· ,'d-parking issue on a ballot, but
the issue lost bv a landslide.
That's when the RVers, under
the guidance of Taylor, took a
new approach· In California, the
city has only the authority given
to it by the state legislature over
streets and highways. If a city
chooses to impose parking
restrictions bevond the 72-hour
street-parking limit provided for
bv the state, there is a state code
section that requires the city to
post these parking ordinances on
.,,igns before they can be enforced.
Tavlor claimed that the city's
ordinance prohibiting RV
parking on streets could not be
enforced since the required signs
were not in place. To legally
enforce the ordinance, the city
would have to post signs every
250 feet on streets where the
restrictions were to apply.
Armed with this information,
RV owners took their grievance
to the administration hearing
officer, but, as anticipated, thev
lost. Undaunted, they appeale~i
to the Municipal Cot~rt where a
trial was held, but again the
RVers lost.
The next step was an appeal to
the Superior Court, and it was
there, during a hearing before
three judges, that the RVers won
a sweet victorv. The Superior
Court overturned the Municipal
Court's ruling and said that the
city cannot prohibit Street parking
without posting the signs as
required bv the state code. As
Taylor pointed out, at a cost of
$1~50 to purchase and install each
sign, it would be an extremely
costly venture that would irritate
taxpapers footing the bill.
That leaves the city with the
option of changing the existing
ordinance and allowing RVers to
park their vehicles on their prop-
erty, or having the rigs parked on
the streets, which is not a desir-
able option to RV owners, who
must move their vehicles every
72 hours, or to non-RV owners or
the city.
The Good Sam Club does not
encourage or condone long-term
street parking for RVs. It does
encourage reasonable street-
parking limits for loading/
unloading vehicles (usua¥
hours), but the Club discou,,ses
RV owners from demanding the
right to store their vehicles on
city streets. However, RVers have
moved their rigs to the streets in
an effort to encourage the city to
cooperate with RV owners in
providing reasonable ordinances
for parking their vehicles on their
own property.
Since RV storage facilities will
not accommodate the vast
number of RVs in Salinas and
many other California communi-
ties, it was the only recourse,
short of selling their rigs, left to
RV owners.
The Salinas situation bears
watching. After the Superior
Court ruled in favor of the RVers,
the city approached the sta'
about enacting a law that v,
have eliminated the need for
posting signs in order to enforce
a city parking ordinance, but the
issue was not introduced to the
legislature.
CALIFORNIA, San Bruno
When the City Council of the
San Francisco Bav community of
San Bruno, California, reaffirmed
the council's support for a con-
troversial law that had been
passed the preceding year aimed
at restricting boat and RV storage
on private propert.s; Jack
Bartalini took it as a personal
assault and waged war on the
council. Council members soon
learned that Bartalini was not a
person to be taken lightly. The
battle that ensued led to many
bitter debates and, finally, to a
general election that found
",rtalini leading RVers to a vic-
.,'y over the city officials. It was
one of the more interesting and
hard-fought campaigns in the
history of RV parkin,q legislation.
The battle heated up early in
1992 when Bartalini was quoted
in the local newspaper as s,Lving
that what the council was trying
to do was "un-American." He
claimed that the council passed
the anti-RV ordinance without
the knowledge of RV ownt:rs.
However, when the council
attempted to enforce the ordi-
nance, the protest from RVers
was so loud that the council put a
moratorium on enforcing it until
October 1, 1992, allowing some
time for discussion. It was public
knowledge that the mayor and
most of the council members
were against RVs.
Bartalini organized a picnic
and rally at a local park, inviting
RV owners and the press to
attend the rally and organize
their efforts to fight the issue. It
was a move that brought RVers
together to form a united front
against ttxe city government.
In response, the council put the
RV issue on the November ballot,
convinced that it would lead to
an anti-RV vote. Since it was a
presidential election year, a good
turnout for tile election was guar-
anteed. There were two meastires
concerning RVs: One asked tile
voters if they wanted to continue
with tile anti-RV law as it was,
which included prohibiting self-
propelled vehicles from parking
on driveways, and the other was
an advisory measure that would
allow parking of certain boats
and RVs less than 6 feet 6 inches
in height and fewer than 25 feet
in length on private property.
Bartalini launched his cam-
paign to defeat both of these
measures. He distributed 10,000
voter-information pamphlets,
going door to door in every
neighborhood in 5an BrunD, a
community with a population of
40,000. He drove up and down
every street, looking for boats
and RVs, to provide owners with
information and ask for a nom-
inal donation to finance the cam-
paign against the issues on the
ballot. He enlisted the aid of
others in carrying on a telephone
campaign. He was relentless in
his efforts to protect the rights of
RVers in San Bruno.
On election day, the efforts
expended by Bartalini and other
RV owners paid off; both of the
measures on the ballot were
defeated. The RV owners were
victorious, and the anti-RV ordi-
nance has been erased from the
books of the city of San Bruno.
3. "Self-transported" shall mean capable of being moved from one place to another
over streets, roads and highways bv means of motor power which is an integral part of the
main equipment.
4. "Self-transported recreational vehicle" shall mean a recreational vehicle with at
least four (4) balloon-tired wheels which is self-transported sucl~ as a recreational van or motor-
home.
5. "Store" shall mean to place a recreational vehicle for the purpose of preserving,
protecting and securing it for a period in excess of twenty-four (24) hours·
B. Garage Parking and Storage. Any such recreational vehicle may be parked or stored in
a parking garage on the zoning lot if such vehicle is of such a size as to permit it to be conve-
ruentlv stored in such garage with the garage door closed.
C. Self-Transported Recreational Vehicle Parking and Storage. A self-transported recre-
ational vehicle may be parked or stored in a front, side or rear yard on a lot in a R1-75, Rl-100
or R2-F Zoning District subiect to the requirements set forth in this section·
D. Other Recreational Vehicle Storage and Parking. A recreational vehicle which is not
self-transported may be stored or seasonally parked on a lot in an R1-75, Rl-100 or R2-F Zoning
District subject to the requirements of this section and the following conditions:
1. From April I to November 15 in any calendar year, one such recreational vehicle
may be parked in a front yard on a vehicle access driveway or hard surfaced parking area.
2. One such recreational vehicle may be stored on the zoning lot in the rear yard or
the side vard.
3. If suci~ recreational vehicle cannot be stored in the rear yard because access for
such vehicle through the zoning lot to the rear yard is prohibited by a permanent structure per-
mitted on the zoning lot, and such vehicle cannot be stored in the parking garage, such vehicle
mav be stored in a front or side yard on a vehicle access driveway of hard surfaced parking
area, provided that such vehicle does not exceed 28 feet m length.
E. Front ~;~rd Requirements. Any recreational vehicle parked in a front vard shall comply
with the lollowing requirements:
1. Such vehicle shall be parked in the vehicular access driveway or hard surfaced
parkin.~ area.
2. Such vehicle .,,hall be parked as close to the front building line as is possible, no
nearer to any side lot line than 5 feet m a R1-75 and R2-F zoning district, no nearer to any side
lot line than 10 feet in a R1-100 zoning district, and no nearer to any public right-of-way than 20
feet.
F. Rear Yard Requirements. Any recreational vehicle parked or stored in a rear yard shall
comply with the following requirements:
I. Such vehicle shall be stored no nearer to the main structure on the lot or an
adjoining lot than 20 feet, and to any side or rear lot line than 5 feet.
Z. The total area covered by accessory structures and recreational vehicles in a rear
yard shall ~ot exceed 30';; ot the required rear yard.
3. The grading of the lot shall not be altered and the drainage of the area shall not be
obstructed t~r altered unless approved bv the City Engineer.
G. Side Yard Requirements. Anv recreational vehicle parked or stored m a side vard shall
not be st, biect to specific side yard requirements except as set forth in paragraph H b~iow.
H. General Requirements. Any recreational vehicle stored or parked in any residential
zoning district shall comply with the following requirements.
CALIFORNIA, San Diego
Until 1991, Mae jo Slager was a
senior citizen who lived a quiet
life in San Diego and enjoyed
RVing with her husband. Today,
Mae Jo is best known as the gutsy
ladv who took on the countrv's
sixth largest citv and won. It was
a major accomplishment.
To achieve a decisive victory in
San Diego took a lot of effort on
the part of Slager and the RVers
who responded to her leadership.
It was in t990-91 that tile citv
decided to enforce an RV ordi-
nance that had been on the books
since 1987 and amended in 1988
-t 1989. According to the terms
.hat ordinance, RVs could not
be parked in a required front or
street-side yard, and those m rear
and side yards had to be con-
cealed from an.,,, public street by a
solid. 1 O-foot screen.
Determined to fight such an
unreasonable ordinance. Sla~er
went into action. ~ron'~ a nuc[etL',
of 13 RV owners..,,lie organized
RV's United for Fair Play. Only
one person per family was
allowed to become a member
and attend meetings, limiting
votes to one per rig.
As word of the fledgling orga-
nization spread. the roster grew
at an unbelieveable rate. To
establish a war chest, everwine
ioining the organization was
asked for a voluntary $10 dtma-
~. In Slager's own words. "The
onev never stopped coming
in." Cbntributions came from
Good Sam chapters and other RV
clubs as well as individual., and
fraternal organizations. What was
especially surprising was
receiving contributions from Good
Sam chapters and individual
members as far as 200 miles away
from San Diego. Thwugh these
contributions, the Fair Play war
chest grew to $9,000.
Once the organization was
established, Slager encouraged a
letter-writing campaign directed
at city officials; she even pro-
vided the names of those who
would be determining the fate of
RVers in San Diego. She went to
.surrounding communities and
encouraged RVers to let the
leaders of San Diego know that
thev were being watched.
[iv August 1991, the wheels
were turning. The San Diego
planning commissioners were
fullv aware that the RVers of San
Diego were angry. The Sail Diego
I'lannmg and Zoning
Department made overtures
about having a meeting with rep-
resentatives from RV's United for
Fair Play to determine what
changes would be necessary to
satisfv the RVers, but since no
meeting was scheduled, the Fair
Plav members submitted their
position in writing.
This position offered nine
alternatives, including the estab-
lishment of a self-governing com-
mittee to act on complaints
received bv the zoning depart-
ment about RVs. If no solution
could be enacted, the issue
would be directed back to the
zoning department for action.
The proposal submitted also
included a survey of available RV
storage spaces in San Diego; the
statistics were alarming. There
were more than 100,000 RVs of all
types in San Diego (including
boats), but at the time of the
survey, there were only 85 avail-
able spaces for civilians and 236
for military personnel.
It was obvious that RV's
United for Fair Play leaders had
done their homework, but their
efforts fell on deaf ears. Planning
commissioners sent a recommen-
dation to the city council that the
code be maintained as written.
More than 100 RVers attended the
planning commission meeting
when this decision was made,
but not one of them was allowed
to speak.
As Slager later said, virtually
everwine at city hall was against
the RVers. Even the powerful San
Diego Union Tribune, with a circu-
lation of 400,000, took an anti-RV
stand.
In spite of this torrent of anti-
RV sentiment, Slager and her
forces rolled up their sleeves and
turned their attention to the city
council. In February 1992, armed
with 6,400 address labels of Good
Sam members in the city plus
names on the roster of RV's
United for Fair Play, Slager and
her committee mailed fliers to
15,000 RV owners in San Diego.
Printing for the fliers was pro-
vided free bv two firms; the cost
for postage and paper, which
came to $1,160.49, came from the
b. 5aid area is perpendicular to the public right-of-way and between the sidewalk adjacent
to the property. and the building setback.
c. No other on-site alternative placement options are available.
d. Complies with Municipal Code section 101.0407(E)(3).
3. Maximum Driveway Width. No driveway or required off-street parking area shall
exceed a width of twenty-five (~) feet within a required front or street side yard, or at any point
between a property line and an established setback line. There shall be no le~s than thirty (30)
feet within a required front or street side yard, or at any point between a property, line and an
established setback line. There shall be no less than thirty (30) feet, measured at the property
line, between driveways serving the same premises. All ~riveways shall lead to a legal off-~treet
parking area on the same premises (and/or to legal parking on neighboring property, if per-
mitted by variance, recorded map easement, or other approved mechanism) or shall provide for
required parking per Municipal Code section 101.0407(E)(2).
F. OUTDOOR STORAGE AND PLACEMENT
Storage and placement of material and equipment outside a roofed, fully-enclosed, legally-
installed structure is permitted as follows, subject to compliance with all applicable fire, health,
safety., litter and building codes.
~. The type and quantity of stored and placed items must be clearly incidental to residen-
tial use and enjoyment of the premises; those items, except as exemptetJ below, are further pro-
hibited from or restricted within required yard and setback areas by the terms of Municipal
Code section l 01.0609. '
2. Unless otherwise noted in Municipal Code sections 101.0407(F)(4) and (F)(5), all stored
or placed items shall be completely screened by legally installed and maintained solid fencing,
walls, building, landscape features, or a combination thereof. No item shall exceed the height of
the solid screening enclosure, except where City-wide screening requirements are stipulated for
specific equipment elsewhere in this Code.
3. Not morethan one (1) fully screened outdoor area may be used to store vehicle and/or
other equipment parts and/or inoperable vehicles. Such storage may not exceed four hundred
(400) square feet in area, may not intrude into any required yard and may not exceed 10'-0" in
height except as prescribed in Municipal Code sections 10l.~)407(F)(4), (5) and (6).
4. The following items may be placed outdoors without screening:
a. Any item listed in Municipal Code section 101.0609.
b. Home maintenance or lawn maintenance equipment and supplies during actual use. The
Development Services Director shall determine the necessity for extended placement when
questions arise.
c. Game, sport and leisure equipment designed and intended for on-site recreational enjoy-
ment when such equipment is set up and immediately available for such use.
d. Bicycles, tricycles, children's wagons and other small non-motorized wheeled devices in
workin,q condition and used for recreational purposes either on-site or on neighboring
streets or properties. A non-motorized wheeled device with any plane dimension of greater
than twenty-four (24) square feet is subject to Municipal Code section 101.0407(F')(5). The
requirements set forth in this section only apply to parking areas that are located within a
required front or side yard setback. To the greatest extent possible, the rear yard setback
should be used for ve~icle or equipment parking/storage. Otherwise:
5. For lots developed with interior side yards of less than ten (10) feet, no access to the rear
yard and no other on-site parkin§ areas located outside of the front or side yard setbacks, one
(1) of the following items may be stored outdoors in the required front or sidle yard setbacks
subject to the requirements contained in paragraphs a through c of this subsection 5:
1. Community concen~ regarding the recurring on-street pal .... g of recreational vehicles
and the lack of off-street parking provisions for such vehicles have been expressed periodically
over the past fifteen years.
2. Although the code does not expressly provide/or parIcing of "recreational vehicles" in
single family lots. past and current City. policy has been to treat them as any other vehicle
which may be parked on single-family lots.
3. Upon reviewing the pertinent sections of the code, staff is recommending'that the
zoning code be amended to include explicit references to recreational vehicle parking provisions.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ci~ of West Covina, Califorma. does
ordain as follows:
SECTION NO. 1: Based on evidence presented and findings set forth, Amendment
No. 23-t is hereby approved as consistent with the City's General Plan.
SECTION NO. 2: Based on the evidence presented and the findings set forth, Chapter
26, Articles II and VIII are hereby amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
Sec. 26-118. Vehicles, definitions relating to.
~m) "Recreational ¥~hicle" means a vehicle, with or without motive power, capable of
human habitation or camping purposes and/or used for sporting, recreation. or social
activities including but not limited to trailers, semi-trailers, motor coaches. motor homes,
fifth-wheels, campers, and camper shells, and camper trailers.
ARTICLE VIII. RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE/ONE FAMILY ZONE
Sec. 26-391, Permitted uses.
(h) Parking or storing of commercial vehicles or commercial equipment is prohibited. It
shall be unlawful to park or store any commercial vehicles, trailers or other related equip-
ment on property which is zoned fo~: residential uses. The provision of this subparagraph
(h) shall not apply to commercial automobiles, pickups, panel delivery'trucks and station
~x'agons, passenger or cargo vans. For purposes of this section. recreational vehicles are not
considered commercial vehicles.
(i) Parking or storing vehicles.
Parking or storing vehicles including recreational vehicles is permitted in the Residential
Agricultural and One Family Zone on lots which are developed with a private single
family residence subject to the following provisions:
(1) Within the front vard, parking or storing of vehicles is permitted only upon paved
areas.
(2) Within the street side vard or interior side yard, vehicles must be screened from
abutting streets and/or properties with a six-foot high masonry block wall. fence, or
solid landscaping treatment.
(3) Within the rear yard, vehicles cannot be located within five (5) feet of the rear
property line and must be screened from ab.u. tting streets and/or properties with a six
foot high masonry block wall, fence, or solid landscaping treatment.
(4) As used in this section, a "front" yard refers to all space between the main
building ~also the projection of the main building to the side property lines) and the
front property line. "Street side vard" and "interior side vard" refers to all space
between the main building talso the projection of the main building to the front and
rear property tines) and the street side and interior side property lines. respectively.
27
CALIFORNIA, San
Rafael
The community of San Rafael
determined that the citv's 40-
year-old zoning ordinance
needed to be revised. After three-
and-one-half vears of research,
the new ordinance was unveiled,
but there were those who were
less than pleased with the section
of the ordinance controlling RV
parking in the city, an issue that
the old ordinance did not
address. In essence, RVs longer
than 20 feet would be prohibited
from parking on streets, in drive-
ways or other parts of residential
property..
Members of the Top of the Bay
Good Sam chapter realized that it
probably was a few careless RV
owners who were responsible for
such a restrictive clause in the
zoning ordinance, and expressed
their views before the city
council. The Good Samers felt
that these few cases should be
handled individually rather than
imposing the ordinance on all
RVers.
When the council members
saw the large turnout of RV
owners at the first hearing on the
ordinance, they realized that the
RV issue was bv far the most cc
troversial in the ordinance. A fe'
spoke against RVs on private
property, but since the vast
majority of those at the meeting
were against the restrictions,
council members determined th.
the size restriction was not justi-
fied and changed the ordinance
before it was voted into law.
Once again, showing up in a
united group to protect their
rights paid off for members of tl
Good Sam Club.
CALIFORNIA, Santa Clara
When the communitv of Santa
Clara, California, threatened to
ban all RV parking in front of
homes or in driveways, RVers
expressed their opposition to the
issue. Some agreed to serve on a
committee to draft a compromise
ordinance. Meanwhile, anti-RV
forces threatened to put an initia-
tive on the ballot opposing RV
parking. However, the council
must approve funding for initia-
tives placed on the ballot.
Before the issue reached that
point, the compromise ordinance
was presented to the city council.
After the required hearings were
held, the council approved an
ordinance that most RVers find
reasonable. Essentially, RV
parking is permitted in front
yard areas as long as the vehicle
is perpendicular to the street and
at least 45 percent of the yard
remains in grass. Good $amer Ed
Borner said that even though it is
a reasonably liberal ordinance,
there is little effort to enforce it.
ORDINANCE NO. 1634
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AMENDING ARTICLES 5, 6, 7, AND 41
OF "THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA" PERTAINING TO
MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND REGULATION OF PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL
FRONT YARDS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, as follows:
SECTION 1: That Article 5 of the "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Santa Clara" is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Article 5. Regulations for RI-SL
Single-Family, Larger Lot Area Zoning Districts
Sec. 5-11. Parking Requirements (05/92)
(a) Eacl~ single family dwelling shall have two garage or carport parking spaces; these
parking spaces shall be prohibited in required front yards or corner lot side yards. A minimum
drivewav length of twenty (20) feet shall be required between said parking and any street right-
of-way line.
(b) Additional parking shall be permitted in required front yards or corner lot side yards,
with motor vehicles, trailers, and boats parked in an orderly manner, generally perpendicular
to the street. Such parking shall be prohibited in the 35 percent minimum landscaped area.
Motor vehicles which do not comply with restrictions imposed by other sections of this
Ordinance are prohibited.
(c) Parking shall only be allowed on areas surfaced with all-weather materials such as
concrete, asph.alt, brick, stone or gravel. -
(d) More information on prohibited activities in residential districts may be found in
Article 41 of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 7: Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect 30 davs after its final adoption and before its adoption it
shall be published in accordance with the ~harter of the City of Santa Clara.
PASSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION this 5th day of May, 1992.
CALIFORNIA, West Covina
In 1989, the citv of West
Covina, California, was consid-
ering an ordinance that would
have removed RVs froin city
streets at all times. Good Samer
Irving N. Rubenstein wrote to
headquarters saying that while
he kept his 35-foot motorhorne in
storage, there were times when
he needed to have it at his home
for a few davs to prepare for a
trip.
When the issue came before
the citv council for a vote, the
majority of the council members
voted for passage of the restric-
:ve ordinance; it was to become
.fective in Februarv 1990. RVers
went into action, writing letters
and attending meetings to
express their opposition to the
ordinance. At that point, the
council tabled the issue.
Letters to the editor started
appearing in the San Gabriel
Valley Tribune, including one that
asked the council to leave RVers
alone and address the real issues
facing the city, like gangs, crime
and the budget. Another
addressed a claim by a Covina
citv official that RVs parked in
drivewavs make excellent
hiding p~aces for criminals who
have just left the scene of a bur-
glary. The author of the letter
had been a Los Angeles police
officer for 25 years who said he
searched hundreds of RVs,
"looking for that one burglar
who was stupid enough to trap
him/herself in one of these vehi-
cles. Never found one."
However, not all of the letters
were in sympathy with RVers.
One congratulated the council for
their "sound judgment" on the
RV issue in spite of the "rude and
disruptive behavior displayed by
a rowdy group."
To resolve the problem, the
council appointed a committee
comprised of those on both sides
of the issue. The resulting ordi-
nance allows up to 72-hour street
parking; if there is a special need
to park longer, the RVer can
apply for a permit. The ve~
also can still be parked on
ment in front of a residence.
RVers find the decision a reason-
able one.
ORDINANCE NO. 1855
AN ORDINANCE OF TIdE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 26, ARTI-
CLES I1 AND VIIi, REL,\TING TO RECREATION VEHICLE PARKING AND STORAGE IN
THE RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL (RA) AND ONE FAMILY (R-I) ZONES. (Amendment
No. 234)
WHEREAS, at the recommendation of an Ad Hoc Citizen's Committee on the issue of over-
sized and recreational vehicles, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to conduct
a studv and prepare an appropriate draft ordinance providing for recreational vehicle storage
within the Citv including consideration of procedures for allowing parking on single-family
lots; and
WHERE,AS, ~he Planning Commission upon givin~ the required notice, did on the 20th dav of
June, ! 990, conduct a dulv a d vertised public hearing as prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Planning Department,
fhe Planning Commission, and other interested parties at a duly advertised public hearing held
on July 23, 1990; and
WHEREAS, studies and investi.gations made bv the City Council and in its behalf reveal the fol-
lowing facts:
Recreational vehicles, travel trailers, trailers, boats, all-terrain vehicles, camper shells,
motorcycles and similar equipment, provided that the vehicle or equipment is maintained in an
operabie condition. (An operable. self-propelled vehicle may be parked in the same manner as
any other operable vehicle, pursuant to the San Diego Municipal Code Chapter X, Article 1,
Division 8.)
a. A listed item shall be placed perpendicular to the front property line when the item is
located within the required front yard setback.
b. For equipment that is Iocat,.~l within the required front or side yard setbacks, a three (3)
foot high solid wall/fence or landscape material which shall reach a minimum height of
three (3) feet within two (2) years of installation, shall be placed along interior property
lines adiacent to the above listed item.
c. The provisions of this subsection 5 shall not affect the validity, application or enforce-
ment of anv Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or any other agreement
relating parking and storage of any of the items listed in this subsection 5 if the CC&Rs or
agreements are more restrictive that the provisions of this subsection 5.
(AMENDED 7-25-94 BY 0-18088 N.S.)
"Rear vard" refers to all space between the main building (also the projection of the
main building to the side property. lines) and the rear property. line.
(5) There shall be no overhang of the vehicle along adjacent public sidewalks and
rights-of-way, and a fortv-five degree diagonal comer cut-off shall be provided to
allow clear vision of such sidewalks or nghts-oi-way for at least ten (10) feet along
driveways.
(6) Parking and stonng of vehicles shall be allowed onlv as an accessory use which is
incidental to the primary. residential use of property..
Sec. 26-402.5 Maximum front vard pavement coverage.
(c) Administrative Review Board members appeal procedures, time limit and compliance
requirements shall be as provided in sections 26-267 through 26-269 of this chapter.
Through appropriate procedure to protect the interest of owners of property. abutting the
subject property., the Administrative Review Board shall review and approve or deny the
following:
(1) A modification of the front vard pavement coverage to permit twelve (12) feet of
new paving to be added to one side of a drivewav or to anv other location within the
front vard in lieu of six (6) feet on either side of the driveway providing it is perpen-
dicular to the adjacent street and does not impact adjoining properR'.
(2) Substitutions of paved materials for the added paved area if found to be substan-
tialiv similar to the requirements of this article.
(3) A modification to the front pavement coverage to permit a circular drive.
SECTION NO. 3: It has been determined that this project, which consists of a minor
amendment to land use requirements is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15305 (Clas
5-minor alterations in land use limitations) of the State CEQA Guidelines and no
Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration Of Environmental Impact is required.
SECTION NO. 4: The Citv Clerk shall certifv to the passage of the Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th dav of August, 1990.
war chest. It was a gamble, but it
was the committee's last chance
'~eat the anti-RV ordinance.
. he flier encouraged RVers to
bombard the mavor and council
members with mail and, if pos-
sible, to attend the citv council
meeting on March 17, 1992, when
a decision would be made about
the recommendation from the
planning commission. Slager's
goal was to see that the mayor
and each council member
received at least 1,000 letters of
protest.
As March 17 dawned, RV
owners prepared to descend on
citv hall for the city council
meeting. The groundwork was
laid. Each person attending the
meeting was wearing an electric
orange label with "RV's United
for Fair Play" printed on it.
Before each council member was
~cket of information from
s United for Fair Plav with an
orange label on it.
Before the meeting was under
way, more than 900 RV owners
jammed the council chambers
and an auxiliary room equipped
with a sound system to follow
the proceedings. Seven represen-
tatives of the Fair Play committee
spoke, each presenting different
information on the subject of RV
parking. The presentation had
been carefully rehearsed and
timed the night prior to the
meeting.
It didn't take council members
long to realize that the RVers were
well organized and determined
to win. Councilman Ron Roberts
took the lead and made a motion
that the existing ordinance be
changed to meet most of the
RVers' demands. All of the council
members, including the mayor,
agreed, and the RVers of San
Diego knew that their efforts had
paid off. The ordinance was sent
back to the planning department
for proper wording and was to
be returned to the city council for
a final vote on April 21.
Needless to say, Slager and her
troops attended the April 21
meeting to make certain that the
ordinance was acceptable as
written. The RVers had to give in
on parallel parking in the front
yard, but the required fencing or
natural screening was reduced
from a height of 10 feet to 3 feet.
All in all, it-was a great victory.
City council members who spoke
with Slager said that it was the
manner in which the RV owners
were organized that swaved the
council to take a very favorable
stance on the issue.
After spending $6,000 for
many mailings and other
expenses, RV's United for Fair
Play had $2,400 that has been set
aside for future problems.
Meanwhile, Slager has become
a driving force in other Southern
California communities facing
RV parking problems. Her fame
is spreading, and others are
turmng to her for guidance and
advice, which she willingly
provides.
Her celebrity status has made
significant changes in the quiet
lifestyle this San Diego senior cit-
izen once enjoyed.
ORDINANCE NUMBER 101.0407
R-1 ZONES
E. PARKING REGULATIONS
l. Every premises shall be provided with a minimum of permanently maintained off-street
parking spaces in a parking area or private garage on the same premises as follows:
a. For each dwelling unit ~ two spaces.
b. For each two lodgers ~ one space.
2. Off-street parking spaces shall be constructed, maintained and used in compliance with
San Diego Municipal Code Chapter X, Article 1, Division 8, except that the required parking
mav be provided on a driveway or paved surface within the front or street side yard on
premises where required parking was converted to habitable space prior to January 1, 1992, sub-
ject to the following standards:
a. Said area complies with the standards for required parking contained in Municipal Code
section 101.0813 utilizing a maximum of five (5) feet of the undeveloped public right-of-
wav. In no case shall the sidewalk be obstructed or encroached upon by a vehicle parked
within said area.
OHIO, Strongsville
After storing an RV on his
property since 1977 and a boat in
his side yard, Allen Clancy was
not pleased when he learned that
an anti-RV ordinance, passed in
1978, was going to be enforced.
The ordinance stated that RVs
"mav be permitted on a residen-
tial lot, provided tiler are stored
in an enclosed structure. except
that boats and trailers of 18 feet
or less in length mav be stored
a rear yard."
When RV and boat owners
protested, the city agreed to tem-
,-,orarilv suspend' entorcement
ordinance. However, there
.. as strong opposition to
changing the restrictive ordi-
nance bv the anti-RV forces in the
commun'itv.
For two years, the RVers con-
tinued to negotiate with council
members, but it had to be done
tm an individual basis so the ses-
sions would not be considered
meetings. Eventually, the RVers
had three council members on
their side. In countering argu-
ments from those who said they
did not like to see RVs in their
neighborhoods, Clancy said that
he didn't like swing sets, above-
the-ground pools and other items
that were considered proper. One
councilwoman who was strongly
opposed to RVs claimed that they
were unsafe because of the
propane tanks on them, but
Clancv shot back by asking her if
she had a propane-operated gas
grill right next to her home. The
councilwoman also mentioned
the supply of gasoline in a
motorhome, but he reminded her
that the cars she kept on her
property also had gasoline tanks.
She finally admitted that Clancy
had the answers to all of her anti-
RV arguments, but she never
turned in favor of the RVers.
However, enough council
members did realize that a strin-
gent ordinance would put a
hardship on RVers and drafted a
new ordinance that is quite rea-
sonable. But it was too late fi'
Clancy; during the negotiati,
he sold his RV and his boat
because he had been cited and
could not locate adequate com-
mercial storage near his residence.
ORDINANCE NO. 1991 - 136
AN ORDIN..\N(.'F ..\MENDINC SECTION 1252.26 OF CHAPTER 1252 OF TITLE SIX OF PART
TWELVE. ['LANNIN£; AND ZONING CODE, OFTHE CODIFIED ORDINANCE OFTHE
CITY OF STRONGSVILLE PERTAINING TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING AND
STORAGE...\S AMENDED.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF $TRONGSVILLE, COUNTY OF
CUYAHOGA AND STATE OF OHIO:
Section 1. That Section 1252.20 of Chapter 1252 of Title Six of Part Twelve, Planning and
Zoning Code, of tile Codified Ordinance of the City of $trongsville be and hereby is amended to
read in ~ts ennretv as tollows:
1252.26 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING AND STORAGE.
A. Definitions. For the purpose of this section, words shall have the following meanings:
l. "Recreational vehicle" shall mean any vehicle or equipment designed' for or pri-
marily used as a travel trailer, camper, motor hor~e, tent trailer, camping trailer, boat, boat
trailer. snowmobile or snowmobile trailer.
2. "Park" shall mean to place a recreational vehicle for the purpose of convenient
departure trom ~r return to the vehicle in connection with a planned trip, outing or vacation,
tnclu~Jin~ the ~,r~,cc~,.,,e~ ~,~ l~,.~din~ or unloading tile vehicle and preparation of the vehicle.
1. No such recreational vehicle shall be parked or stored on a public or private street,
alley, treelawn or sidewalk, except vehicles licensed for street travel may be parked on public or
private streets during the hours and in the areas designated for automobiles as specified else-
where in the Codified Ordinances, provided such vehicles are currently licensed.
2. No such recreational vehicle shall have fixed connections to electricity, water. gas,
or sanitary sewer facilities, nor shall any such recreational vehicle at any time be t~sed for living
or housel~eeping purposes on the zonir~g lot.
3. Any such recreational vehicle shall be kept in good repair and in working condi-
tion, with current license plate. unless stored in a parking garage.
Date passed: Nov. 4, 1991
Date approved: Nov. 12, 1991
LOVE RVS CO1VI1ViI'I'I'J E
April 08 1998
Subject: RV parking rights talking points
RV owner profile
' Member of a billion dollar industry.
' Recreation/tourism key elements(ie. Temecula ballon/wine festival)
"Encompasses all age groups (young families to senior citizens)
' Appx 35% belong to one often national RVclubs((400 families belong
to one club in Ternecula)
*Participants to this life style are tax payeruvoters/law abiders and
generally good neighbors.accomodating where possible
RV owner issues/concerns
'Past lot size plans lacked proper clearance for side or rear yard access
· Many have had concrete pads and side access driveways poured at
great expense and where it was possible
'Storage facilities are costly/un secure/inconvenient/onavailable
· Street parking for both cars and RVs not desireable nor safe and.
because of state law which requires posting on every block.
unsightly difficult to enforce and very expensive
But what are the options if property parking is resu'icted?
· Perception that owning/parking a RV decreases surrounding
propert3d. most realtors say RVs in the neighborhood do nothing to decrease
residences value and when a home has RV parking the value for that
home is increased.
Possible loneerin solutions
*Require new development to have a predetermined number of homes with side or rear yard clearance for RVaccess
' Modi~., existing code to be more accomodating for fi'ont yard parking
provided side/rear yard not available and safety.
and health not compromised
*Sanction a citizen committee made up of both sides of this issue and a
neutral moderator to make recommendations to the council
Summation
· Property rights vs individual rights and home owner associations
vs non associations are difficult issues which demand
careful dialoque and no early rush to judgement to
promote fairness and prevent any unwanted and costly
litigation or an unwarranted reputation as an unfi'iendly to RVers
city
Working together we can make n difference !!!!!
Respectfully s[Jbmitted.
Mike Ramey
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MAY 6, 1998
R:~STAF'FRPT~49PA9?.PC4 6/24/9~ mf 27
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
COM/vIUNITY DEVELOPM~NT DEPART1WRNT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
May 6, 1998
On-Site Storage of Vehicles in Residential Zones
Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission:
Receive the Staff Report and Provide Recommendations to the City Council
Regarding Modifications to the Existing Development Code Regulations
Pertaining to the On-Site Storage of Vehicles (to Include Recreational
Vehicles) in Residential Zones
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission was directed by the City Council, at the joint City Council/Planning
Commission Workshop on April 21, 1998, to consider the information and direction provided to them
at that meeting and provide a recommendation (or recommendations) to the City Council regarding
an Ordinance regulating the on-site storage of vehicles in residential zones. Staff has reviewed the
comments and suggestions from that meeting and has summarized the issues below.
ANALYSIS
.e
Issue: Current Development Code provisions allow for temporary on-site storage for a period
not to exceed five (5) consecutive days.
Option: Reduce the amount of time to two (2) days.
Option: Allow these vehicles to be temporarily stored for two days utilizing a permit process.
R:~TAFFRP~VEHIC-RZ. PCI 4/29/~8 mf 1
Issue: The definition of"vehi¢le" in the Development Code includes automobiles.
Option: Remove automobiles and similar vehicles with a lesser "mass" which could be parked
on the driveway.
Issue: Requiring those who have adequate area in their side or rear yards for storing their
vehicle to store their vehicle there.
Option: Those who have adequate space be given a time period to meet this storage
requirement. For those who did not have adequate space on the side or rear of the house, the
option of a permit system was discussed. The permit could be issued for the particular
vehicle/house and would require notifying the adjacent residents (i.e., within 300'). In
addition, the vehicle would not be allowed to protrude into the right-of-way.
Issue: Storage of vehicles in areas where Home Owner's Associations (HOA's) do not exist.
Option: Limited regulation ofnon-HOA areas with a grace or transition period prior to being
these areas being subject to any new regulations.
In addition, comments were received fi'om residents oflarge-lot residential development (~ acre and
larger) in terms of screening and on-site parking. It is their opinion that they should be able to have
visitors on-site and that the screening required under the Development Code is more designed for
tract houses. Staff concurs with this opinion and recommends the Commission consider language to
address this issue.
Staff will take the direction provided by the Commission and develop a draf~ ordinance for the
Planning Commission and City Council's consideration.
Attachments:
1. Correspondence received - Blue Page 3
R:~qTAFFRPT~VEHIC.RZ. PCI ~'29~g mf 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
R:~TAFFRPT~V~C-RF~pC! 4/29D8 ~ ~
27 APRIL 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY/COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ATTN: MATTHEW R. FAGAN
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92589-9033
REGARDING:
MEETINGS CONCERNING 0RDINAN,OES FOR RV PARKING AND
LOT USE BY PROPERTY OWNERS
SCHEDULED MEETINGS: 28 APRIL AND 6 MAY 1998
IN THE ABOVE SCHEDULED MEETINGS, IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THOSE LIVING IN TEMECULA, THAT PROPERTY RIGHTS
ARE ABOUT TO BE VIOLATED BY CHANGES IN THE EXISTING ORDINANCES
LIMITING USE OF THE PROPERTY BY OWNERS AND PARKING OF
RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND OTHER USES WITHIN THE CONFINES OF
THE OWNED PROPERTY,
IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE REGULATIONS ARE BEING CHANGED BY THOSE
BIASED AGAINST RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP. FORCING
THEM TO PAY FOR STORAGE OF THEIR VEHICLES WHEN NOT IN USE.
THOSE OF US WHO RESIDE ON ACREAGE TYPE PROPERTIES ORIGINALLY
PURCHASED THIS TYPE OF LOT TO INSURE THE CAPABILITY OF HAVING
ALL VEHICLES STORED ON SITE, THESE CHANGES WILL NOT ALLOW THIS
TO CONTINUE,
HAVING BEEN A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1981, LONG BEFORE
TEMECULA BECAME A CITY, IT IS APPARENT THAT MY RIGHTS AS A
PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE VIOLATED BY THESE CHANGES, THE ORDINANCE
THAT WAS PASSED IN 1995 ALSO VIOLATES PROPERTY OWNER'S RIGHTS.
MORE TIME AND STUDY SHOULD BE DONE PRIOR TO ADOPTING CHANGES,
AND THOSE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE WHO VEHEMENTLY OPPOSE
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND PARKING ON PRIVATE LOTS MIGHT
WISH TO TALK WITH THE MORE THAN 5000 OWNERS OF RVs WHO CURRENTLY
RESIDE IN TEMECULA.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE ALL THESE PEOPLE NOTIFIED OF THE PROPOSED
CHANGES BY OTHER THAN JUST NEWSPAPER ARTICLES,
L /~l ¢
39450 PALA VISTA DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92589-0325
Dr. and Mrs. Charles E. Isaac
41797 Corte Camara
Temecula, CA 92592
April 24, 1998
Linda L. Fahey, Chairperson
Planning Commission
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
APR 8 1998
Dear Chairperson Fahey:
It has come to our attention that Recreational Vehicles parking regulations are under discussion for
changes. We wish to voice our concern.
We live in the planned community of Vintage Hills. We live on a 10 house cut-de-sac. We pay for
storage of our 22 ft travel trailer at a facility in Menifee. We do not have the option of on-site parking
since it is prohibited by our Home Owners Association.
We believe we present no public safety hazard and do not impact the value of our neighbor's property
value when we occasionally park our rig on the street. It takes on average one hour driving time each way
to pick up and return our trailer to storage. Most of our usage is on weekend Irips. We load Friday
evenings and leave early Saturaday mornings. We usually return home late Sunday to unload, and then
return the trailer to storage on Monday. We don't take that many trips normally during the fall and winter,
but summer is just around the corner. We look forward to being able to take some get away weekends
We respectfully request that the City NOT adopt an ordiance that would prohibit our abilty to park
overnight in front of our own house for up to 72 hours. If we should lose this parking priviledge; it
would VIRTUALLY DENY ACCESS to use our own trailer!!!
We deeply appreciate your immediate consideration on this matter. Please feel free to call us if you wish
further information. We both work days, but usually someone is home by 4:30 p.m. Our home telephone
number is 909-699-3923.
Thank you.
Charles E. Isaac, DDS
Mary EI'i lsaa~
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
JUNE 3, 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commis_si~?
Debbie Ubnos~, P'lanning Manager
DATE:
June 3, 1998
Planning Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Sections of the City's
Development Code Pertaining to On-Site Storage of Vehicles (Including Recreational
Vehicles) in Residential Zones
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
?,BOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending that the City
Council approve a Resolution entitled: "A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Temecula, California, Amending
Sections of the Temecula Development Code Pertaining to
On-Site Storage of Vehicies in Residential Zones" based upon
the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission was directed by the City Council, at the joint City Council/Planning
Commission Workshop on April 21, 1998, to consider the information and direction provided to them
at that meeting and provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding an Ordinance regulating
the on-site storage of vehicles in residential zones. Staff reviewed the comments and suggestions
from that meeting and provided issues and options for the Commission at their meeting of May 6,
1998. The Commission reviewed the issues which were accompanied by potential options and
received testimony f~m sixteen (16) residents at that meeting. At the conclusion of the meeting the
Commission continued this item to their June 3, 1998 hearing and directed staff to bring back a draft
Ordinance.
ANALYSIS
Staff has addressed and/or clarified the following issues based upon the direction provided by the
Planning Commission: screening, pavin~ number of vehicles per lot, definition ofvehicie, camper
Shell and commercial trailers, setbacks and loading and unloading. Staff reviewed Section
17.24.020.D. of the Development Code, which addresses these issues, and has provided a revised
R:~TAFFRPTO49PA97.PC~ $/27/~ mf 1
copy, which includes redlines for additions and strike outs for deletions, as Attachment No. 1 to thil
Report. Additional definitions, as needed for clarification have been referenced below. Grand
fatbering and additional staff resources will also be discussed below.
Definition of Vehicle
The Commission has requested clarification of the term '%ehicle." Section 17.24.020.D. 1.g of the
Development Code defines vehicles in the following manner: "Vehicles as used in this section shall
include, but not be limited to, commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-
trailers, motorcycles, mopeds, ~, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and
commercial equipment." Based upon the discussion of the Commission, automobiles, motorcycles
and mopeds can be deleted from this list. Staff recommends this Section be modified to address those
concerns and be expanded to include the following language: "...and other non-motorized vehicles,
regardless o£ length or width, that are detached from a motor vehicle." This Section, which staff
recommends be relocated to Section 17.24.020.D. 1.a. would read:
"The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be subject to the provisions
listed below. "Vehicles" as used in this section shall include, but not be limited to,
commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles as defined in Section 18010 of the
California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, house
cars, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and
commercial equipment and other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or
width that are detached from a motor vehicle."
Camper Shells and Commercial Trailers
The Commission stated that camper shells and commercial trailers should be included in the list of
items which also need to be regulated on-site. These items are currently covered in the definition of
"vehicle" which is contained in Section 17.24.020.D. of the Development Code (see above).
Definition of Parking and Storage
There is no definition for parking or storage in the Development Code; however, these terms are used
in Section 17.24.020.D of the Development Code. Staff recommends the following language be
added to Section 17.24.020~D. 1.d of the Development Code: "Parking shall be defined as the standing
of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while
actually engaged in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers. Storage shall be defined to
mean to place or leave in a location for later use."
Number of Vehicles Per Lot
The Commission raised concerns regarding the overall number of vehicles which could be stored on
a single parcel. These concerns focused on safety, aesthetics and the ability to adequately screen all
the vehicles on-site. It is recommended that Section 17.24.020.D.l.m. be added to include the
appropriate language which will limit the overall number of vehicles stored on-site. The exact number
of each type of vehicle, as well as the overall number of vehicles needs to'be prescribed by the
R:WrAFFRIrI'k349PA97.PC3 ~27/9~ mf 2
Commission. Staff recommends that one or two vehicles per parcel is an appropriate place to begin
this discussion.
Setbacks
The Commission stated that they would like the Ordinance to restrict parIcing of vehicles in the front
of houses. The current language, contained in Section 17.24.020.D.l.d talks about side and rear
'~fards." The Assistant City Attorney has reviewed this matter and states: "The Development Code
definition section defines a "required rear" or "required side yard" and "yard." The "required" type
of yard is coincident and serves as a second way to define setback. He recommends a distinction
between "required yard" and a new definition such as "actual yard" be added to Section 17.34 of the
Development Code. He recommends that "actual yard" be denned as follows: "The area between
the horizontal plane of the building plane and the property line." The following change would be
required to Section 17.24.020.D. in order to achieve the Commission's goal to restrict permanent
parking of vehicles in the front of the house:
Add a new definition for "actual yard" to Section 17.34 of the Development Code to
read as follows: "Actual Yard. The area between the horizontal plane of the building
plane and the property line."
Add the following sentence to Section 17.24.020.D.l.f.: '~1o permanent vehicle
parking shall be allowed in the actual front yard."
Screening
The Commission had concerns regarding the adequacy of screening in areas of the City where there
are large parcel subdivisions (½ acre or larger). Current Development Code provisions (Section
17.24.020.D. 1.d) states: "Vehicles may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard; provided, that
such area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by a
fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height." This minimum dimension
serves to screen the bottom portion of the vehicles, which can often exceed ten feet in height. To
raise the minimum height requirement over six feet would result in requiring the screening materials
to be engineered and risk greater obstruction of the views, etc. from adjacent lots. The Assistant City
Aaomey has noted in a memo: "As with any residential area, such things as swing sets, patio covers,
umbrellas, gazebos, and other such constructs promade above the fence lines." It is his opinion that
it is neither "possible nor desirable" to create fi~H-height screening measures that would be
appropriate in a residential area.
Paving
The Commission directed staff to clarify the definition of "paving." According to Section
17.24.050.C of the Development Code: "All required parking spaces, recreational vehicle storage
areas, material storage areas and associated driveways shall be paved in accordance with the design
and construction specifications established by the city engineer." Based upon discussions with the
-Assistant City Engineer, this Section can be modified to read as follows: insert language provided
from Deputy Director of Public Works
R:~TAFFRPT~9PA97.1~3 S7'27/98 mf 3
Loading and Unloading
Current Development Code provisions (Section 17.24.020.D.1.0 state: "Except as provided in herein,
vehicles parked within public view in required or authorized parking areas within the front yard,
comer yard or side yard abutting a street shah be parked or leR standing for temporary periods of
time not to exceed five days." At previous meetings, the Commission discussed limiting this time
period to two (2) days or forty-eight (48) hours. This would allow for temporary loading and
unloading of the vehicles in the front yard setback area.
The following language is recommended to achieve the Commission's recommendation:
'~-pt as provided in herein, vehicles temporarily parked within public view in required or
authorized parking areas within the acU~ front yard, comer side yard or side yard abutxing
a street shall be parked or 1~ standing for periods of time not to exceed two (2) consecutive
days for 1oadin~ unloading and providing minor service to the vehicle."
Other Minor Clean-Up Items to Section 17.24. 020.D
Staff reviewed Section 17.24.020.D. of the Development Code and determined that numbering was
inaccurate. This has been rectified and the corrected Section 17.24.020.D. of the Development Code
is included as Attachment No. 1 to this Staff Report.
Grandfathering
The Commission stated at the May 6, 1998 hearing that they were not in favor of grandfathering or
allowing a grace period for vehicle owners which were existing prior to the adoption of the
Development Code in January, 1995. The rationale for this determination is based on the fact that
a majority of the residential developments within the City are covered by CC&R's which prohibit the
storage of certain types of vehicles, to include recreational vehicles, boats, commercial vehicles,
trailers, etc. in the front yard setback area (i.e., driveway).
Additional Staff Resources
As stated in the Staff Report for the February 2, 1998 Planning Commission meeting~ increased
enforcement of Development Code provisions regulating on-site storage of vehicles would require
additional staff resources. As stated above, enforcement of the Code was primarily driven by
complaints received from residents. According to Code Enforcement staf~ enforcement of this item
required approximately 30=40% of their staff hours and would require the same if they were to pro-
actively enforce the Ordinance. In order to effectively enforce these regulations, one-half of a Code
Enforcement staff person would be required at the current time. The cost to the City (in 1998
dollars) would be 5;27,259.00 annually. This figure would likely be higher in future years.
Other Municipal Code Regulations of Vehicles
-The Assistant City Attorney has recommended that staff review other sections of the City's Municipal
Code which have regulations pertaining to on-site storage of vehicles so that the proposed
amendments to the Development Code will not create any internal inconsistencies. Staff will be
reviewing the Municipal Code at~er adoption of the amendments to the Development Code and
bringing back any clean-up amendments to the Commission for their review.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff will be conducting the appropriate environmental review based upon the recommendation from
the Planning Commission to the City Council. This will accompany the City Council Staff Report and
will be subject to the noticing requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
FINDINGS
Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of
zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as
may be in effect in any such city.
There is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and
welfare
The proposed Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
ordinances.
Attachments:
Revisions to Section 17.24.020.D. - Blue Page 6
New Definition for Section 17.34 - Blue Page 11
Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 13
Exhibit A. Draft Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 16
Correspondence Received - Blue Page 22
A~FACHMENT NO. 1
A PORTION OF SECTION 17.24.020.D.
OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR REVISION
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
17.24.040.D PARKING REQUIREMENTS
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
Parking--Residential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the following provisions listed below 'Vehicles" a~ used in this section
shall include, but .not be 'limited to, commercial vehicles. r~reational vehicles as
defnmd in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers,
motor tincid. semi-trailers, house cars, campers. camper shells, boats or other large
portable recrmfioml and commercial eq,,ipm,mt and other non=motorized vehicles,
r~sardless of'ienggi or width tim are detached fi'om a motor vehicle.
ao
The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
bo
Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required
or authorized off-street paved parking area.
Co
All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall be paved with a permanent paving material. Such
area shall be maintained in a usable condition free of potholes and broken
sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust, without accumulation of loose
material or other deterioration.
do
Vehicles may be parked or stored in the side or rear. yard; provided, that such
area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent
properties by a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet
in height. P~king simll
~ be defined to'mere SO place Or leave in s'iomion for later use.
Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five percent
of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
f.
Except as provided in herein, vehicles teiii'!~orarily parked v, ithin public view
in required or authorized parking areas within the Actual Front Yard, comer
side yard or side yard abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for
terns,or..; periods of time not to exceed frye ~o (2) consecutive days
vehicle parking shall be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
"Vehiclcs" as used in this scctioa shall hidud¢, but hot bc lh~itcd to,
c~s,,~rclal vchick.s, auWshJoilcs, t, uck~ t,,,ilcrs, ,notor h ucks, sa~6-trailcrs,
,.otorc~cles, 11so~,¢ds, ¢alll[,6rs, ¢ailip¢i shdls, boats or other large l~o, cable
~.,catio~ml ~nd cow.,,~rcial equipincat.
No commercial vehicles which exceeds a ~ross weiffht of one and one-half
tons, or exceeds a width of eighty inches or exceeds height of seven feet or
exceeds a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked on any portion of a
residential lot unless:
It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
In connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service
to, or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while
actively involved in such activity; or
In conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid
home occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of
the development code.
No private, noncommercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of
one and one-half tons, or exceeds a width of eighty inches, or exceeds
a height of seven feet or exceeds a length of twenty-five feet; and no
trailer, semitrailer, boat or portable recreational equipment shall be
parked or stored within the front yard, comer side yard or side yard
abutting a street unless:
It is not a commercial vehicle and is parked for a temporary
period of time not to exceed twenty-four hours;
It is involved in loading or unloading activity; and
It is parked in compliance with any other applicable city
ordinance.
Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas shah
be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by guests.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shah be punishable as an
infraction.
In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off-street parking
space shah be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem
parking shah be permitted. Guest parking shah not be permitted in required
setback areas.
A maximum of 1 or 2 vehicles may be parked or stored on a parcel of land at
any one time.
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of.5 acres or more
unless part of a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use
permit.
All storage activities shall be screen from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, betming, dense landscaping or building mass.
bo
Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled
parts are not permitted.
Vehicles and Equipment Repair ¥~'"'~ii!Storsge ofV~hicles m~d Equipment under Repnlr.
The following provisions shall apply to any vehicle as definexi above, motor vehicle,
ro.~o~ml v~hicl¢, ca~p~r, caa~.~ Ua~cr, uall~, u,m~ouatcd ca~p¢~, trailer coach,
n~.~r,.yclc, Loat or sh~il~ om~wya~ in all residential districts, and to all sites in any
other district used for residential occupancy:
Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be
prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an
area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located
fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
bo
Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof,
which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an
essential or legally required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited
unless conducted with a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened
from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall
or equivalent screening.
Co
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and Co) of this
section, emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of
any of the above conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot,
may be conducted for an aggregate period of up to twenty-four hours in any
continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of the screening
requirements.
do
For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shaft have
the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of California,
where such definitions are available.
Parking--Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
located:
a. On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
bo
On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the 1ol
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
On a lot or parcel ofhnd separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or less)
from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
I. The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
and
The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or
parcels would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
it is intended to serve.
d. Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor area.
On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same
ownership. Same ownership includes property that is subject to a binding
recorded lease for not less than ten years from commencement of use. The
parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to, any other
property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property
requiring the parking.
Loading All Uses. Required loading radiities shall be located on the same lot or parcel
of land as the use served.
R:~rAmU'r~gpA~C~ ~'z~n ~ 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NEW DEFINITIONS FOR SECTION 17.34
OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE
R:~TAFFRPTO49PA97.1~3 ~27~9~ mf 1 1
"Actual Yard" means the area between the horizontal plane of the building plane and the property
line."
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
I~TAFIrl~.F/~9PA97.1~3 $/'27/9~ m~ 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF TNE~ CTrY OF TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0349, AM'ENDING
SECTIONS OF THE TEMECUI~ DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
~~4..q, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
W'Hi~AS, on January 2.5, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the Development Code;
W~ERF, AS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
Wi~S, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0349, on
June 3, 1998, at a duly noticed public heating as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
W!~F~REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and aRer due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval Planning Application No. PA97-0349;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ~ CITY OF
TEMECUI~ DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT ~ CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUI~, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEi~CLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN ~ FORM ATTACHED TO
THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
R:~TAFFRFrkMgPA97.]~:I~ ~7/'9t mf 14
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 1998.
Marda Slaven, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of June, 1998
by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONEKS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONEKS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~TAFFRPT~49P~7.1~3 ~27/~! nd 15
EXI~IB1T A
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 98-
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 9~-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALrFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE~
TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ON-
SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUI~, STATE OF CAL]~'ORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general
plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.24.020.D. 1 through 17.24.020.D.6 of the Development Code is
amended to read as follows:
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
1. Parking--Residential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the provisions listed below. "Vehicles" as used in this section shall include, but not be
limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles as defined in Section 18010 of the California
Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, house cars, campers, camper
shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment and other non-motorized
vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle.
a. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
b. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required
or authorized off-street paved parking area.
c. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall be paved with a permanent paving material. Such area shall be maintained
in a usable condition free of potholes and broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust,
without accumulation of loose material or other deterioration.
R:~TAFFRFT~9PA97.PC3 ~'27/9~ mf 17
d. Vehicles may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard; provided, that sucI.
area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by a fence,
wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height. Parking shall be defined as the
standing of a vehicle, weather occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and
while actually engaged in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers. Storage shall be defined
to mean to place or leave in a location for later use.
e. Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five percent
of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
f. Except as provided in herein, vehicles temporarily parked within public view
in required or authorized parking areas within the Actual Front Yard, comer side yard or side yard
abutting a street shall be parked or left standing for periods of time not to exceed two (2) consecutive
days for loading, unloading and providing minor service to the vehicle. No permanent vehicle parking
shall be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
g. No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, or exceeds a width of eighty inches or exceeds height of seven feet or exceeds a length of
twenty-five feet; shall be parked on any portion of a residential lot unless:
i. It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
ii. In connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or.
on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved in such activity; or
'gi. In conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid home
occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of the development code.
h. No private, noncommercial vehicle which exceeds a gross weight of one and
one-half tons, or exceeds a width of eighty inches, or exceeds a height of seven feet or exceeds a
length of twenty-five feet; and no trailer, semitrailer, boat or portable recreational equipment shall be
parked or stored within the front yard, comer side yard or side yard abutting a street unless:
i. It is not a commercial vehicle and is parked for a temporary period of
time not to exceed twenty-four hours;
ii. h is involved in loading or unloading activity; and
'ill It is parked in compliance with any other applicable city ordinance.
i. Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas shall
be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by guests.
infraction.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
k_ In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off=street parking space
shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem parking shall be permitted.
Guest parking shall not be permitted in required setback areas.
any one time.
A maxinmm of 1 or 2 vehicles may be parked or stored on a parcel of land at
2. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of .5 acres or more unless part of
a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use permit.
a. All storage activities shall be screen from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
b. Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are not permitted.
3. Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under Repair.
The following provisions shall apply to any vehicle as defined above, in all residential districts, and
to all sites in any other district used for residential occupancy:
a. Servicing, repairing, assemblin~ disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless conducted
within a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining
lots by a legally located fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
b. Storing placing or paticing any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof,
which is disabled, unlicensed, unregist~ inoperative, or from which an essential or legally required
operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory building,
or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall or
equivalent screening.
c. Not~vithslanding the provisions of' subsections (DX3 Xa) and (b) of'this section,
emergency or minor repairs and short-term or temporary parking of any of the above conveyances
when owned by a person residing on the lot, may be conducted for an agsregate period of up to
twenty-four hours in any continuous period of forty-eight hours exclusive of' the screening
requirements.
d. For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shah have
the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of California, where such definitions
are available.
located:
Parking--Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
a. On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
b. On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
c. On a lot or parcel offand separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or less)
from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
and
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
'tii. The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or parcels
would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
it is intended to serve.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
d. Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor area.
e. On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same ownership. Same
ownership includes property that is subject to a binding recorded lease for not less than ten years from
commencement of use. The parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to, any other
property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property requiring the parking.
6. Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or parcel
of land as the use served.
Section 3. Section 17.34. of the Development Code is amended to include the following:
"Actual Yard" means the area between the horizontal plane of the building plane and the property
line."
Section 4. SevernbiliU'. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance.
Section 5. f:.ffective Date. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days aRer its passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the flirt text of this Ordinance
shah be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shah publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and
post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
~rAmu,r~.~ ~?~ 20
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of
,199~.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of ,199_~ and that thereai~er,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNC~ME~ERS
COUNC~MEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 4
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 20, 1998
Dear City Planner Matthew Fagan,
I am writing you in regards to the controversial subject of
RV parking on my own property.
When our family moved to Temecula in 1987, my wife and
I looked specifically for a development with NO HOAs. From past
experience we found HOAs to be very restrictive and
manipulative by those who sat on the Board. Now it seems as
though the City is considering a measure that will dictate what I
can and can't park in my own driveway! We don't think this is
right. Not everyone can afford a custom home with multiple car
or custom garages for storage of their RVs.
Storage parks aren't the answer for everyone. First and
foremost there is the cost for storage. In most cases, minimal
cost is minimal security. I know of people whose property has
been burglarized or vandalized. So for more security you must
pay more!.
Which also brings up the question of whether Temecula
can meet the need for a sudden increase of storage of RVs.
I think not! In turn, rates would climb because of supply and
demand.
I know in some cases there needs to be some restrictions.
For instance, RVs that are so large, that when parked in a
driveway, they block the sidewalk. But consider the individual
with a ski boat or tent trailer, which are usually smaller than a
5uburban or full-sized pickup truck. Most of these can be parked
in a driveway, without blocking the sidewalk or a persons view.
For instance, our tent trailers' height is lower than our car.
I agree with the restrictions on parking RVs on the City
streets. But please consider that not everyone has the option of
storage to the sides of their homes or can afford paying storage
fees.
So in closing, ! know your intentions are good. But I ask
you to consider, when making your decision, of possible
exceptions for size or type of RV to be parked in the driveway.
Thank you.
Respectfully, ~
J'fhn and Karen Conaway ~
1221 Comotilo Court
Temecula, CA 9259 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
R:~T~P,~L~?.PC4 6,'24,'98 n~'
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
CAI L TO ORDFR
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular session at 6:05 P.M., on
Monday, November 3, 1997, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CA! L
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, and
Chairwoman Fahey.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Principal Engineer Parks,
Attorney Curley,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Assistant Planner Anders, and
Minute Clerk Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMFNTS
None.
COMMISSION BU-~INr:~S
1. APPROVAl nF AC, FNnA
=
MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved for the approval of the Agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous al=proval.
DIR!=CTOR'-~ H!=ARINC- UPDAT!=
As per written material of record, no additional information.
PURl IC H!=ARINC, IT;MS
3. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0349
Repeal Section 17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code pertaining to
Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage in residential areas.
R:~PL.4~COMM~[IIqU'I~S~ 199'~ 11-3-97, pC 12/10/97 Idb 1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommended that this matter be continued to the meeting of December 1, 1997.
Planning Manager Ubnoske informed the Commissioners and attending audience that
staff has been directed by the City Council to readdress this item. In light of this
directive, Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that the prepared information (as per staff
report) might possibly be amended and, therefore, a continuance is being
recommended.
At this time, Chairwoman Fahey opened the public hearing.
A letter of concern (of record) was submitted to the Planning Commission by Mr. Jack
Leathers (42623 Remora Street).
The following individuals spoke with regard to the proposed repeal of Section
17.24.020(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code (storage of recreational vehicles (RV)
in residential areas):
Ms. Betty Condren
Ms. Marcia Watkins
Mr. Frank Geyer
Mr. Bill Gray
Mr. Jim Porter
Mr. Jack Leathers
Mr. Melvin Marks
40741 Calle Katerine
30152 Villa Alturas
40466 Chauncey Way
40414 Yardley Court
40221 Tuolomne Court
42623 Remora Street
32121 Corte Carmona
The above-mentioned individuals expressed concern with regard to the parking of
recreational vehicles in residential areas, noting the following iml~acts it has on the
neighborhood:
overall undesirable appearance of the neighborhood
detrimental to the value of the neighboring properties
public safety - boats/RVs impeding the sidewalks, creating a
safety concern for the children as well as to those individuals
backing out of their driveways
increased public street parking because the boats/RVS are parked
in the driveways
undesirable view from the neighboring residents who do not park
boats/RVs in their driveways
It was noted by the concerned residents that a higher penalty should be imposed on
those individuals not abiding by the Ordinance and that the enforcement of such an
Ordinance should be the responsibility of the City rather than individual Homeowners
Associations.
R:~PLANCO~1997~11-~-97.pc 12/10/97
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
There being no additional input at this time, the public hearing was left open and the
following motion was offered:
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue Planning Application PA97-0349 to the
December 1, 1997, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Slaven and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
Prior to the December 1, 1997, Planning Commission meeting, Commissioner Guerriero
requested that staff obtain additional input from the Police Department with regard to the
enforcement of such an Ordinance.
4. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0319
Amendment to Ordinance No. 81-26 pertaining to advertising regulations and
establishing regulations for the use of ambient air balloons and other similar inflatables.
R!=COMM!=NnATION
It was recommended by staff that the Planning Commission approve the request.
Because of his involvement with the Temecula Art, Balloon, and Wine Festival
Association, Commissioner Guerriero abstained with regard to this issue.
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (of record), noting that the proposed
amendments would clarify the display period, number of allowable signs, and required
spacing between the ambient air balloons.
At this time, Chairwoman Fahey opened the public hearing. There was no input from the
public.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution No.
97- recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 91-
26, Section 19.8, Subsection C.4 and C.5, pertaining to advertising regulations for the use of
temporary ambient air balloons based upon the analysis and findings contained in the staff
report. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Slaven and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exceotion of Commissioner Guerriero who ~bstained.
5. P! ANNIN~ APP! ICATION NO. 97-0-':100
Tentative Parcel Map and Environmental Initial Assessment to allow the subdivision of
21.79 acres into 68 residential lots ranging from 6,414 square feet to 29,000 square
feet.
R?~LANCO~ 1997~11 -~-97.PC 12/10~7 Id~ ~
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 3, 199'.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission apl~rove
the request as conditioned.
Advising that she lives in Meadow View, which borders the common area of discussion,
Chairwoman Fahey noted that she would be abstaining with regard to this issue and,
therefore, departed the meeting.
Because his client is the owner of the property of discussion, Commission Miller also
noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue and removed himself from
the dais.
Acting Chairwoman Slaven presided over the meeting.
Assistant Planner Anders reviewed the staff report (as per written material of record).
Mr. Don Lohr, representing the applicant, requested that Condition No. 4 (the developer
shall form a Homeowners' Association to maintain all slopes that are visible from
Margarita Road, N. General Kearny Road, and Solana Way, and all downward slopes that
are not easily visible to property owners) be clarified to define the downward- slopeo
lots which will be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association -- Lots 1-11, 30-
35, and 38, noting that all other slopes will be the responsibility of the individual
0roperty owner. Mr. Lohr further clarified that any downward slo0es along Margarita
Road would be included in Condition No. 4 as well as parkway landscaping and open
space areas and advised that fencing would be installed at the to;) of each lot with
downward slopes. In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Mr. Lohr elaborated on the
proposed sewer system for the subject site, with ,Principal Engineer Paks advising that
staff is working with Eastern Municipal Water District on this issue but that no final
alignment of the sewer line has been determined.
For maintenance purposes, Mr. Lohr noted that the slopes will be accessible by way of
Margarita Road as well as from a street along the easterly side of the property and that
a 10' path will be constructed along the toe of the entire slope.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Principal Engineer Parks provided clarification with regard
to the wording of Condition No. 22 (public improvements to City of Temecula General
Plan standards), advising that the City's Capital Improvement Project includes full
improvement of Margarita Road including the raised landscaped median and that if the
City's project were to commence prior to the start of the project of discussion, the
developer would not be required to complete this improvement. If this project were
completed prior to the completion of the City's improvement project, the developer must
comply with Condition No. 22.
Assistant Planner Anders noted that Condition Nos. 4, 5, and 57 should be rephrased
as follows:
R :~PLANCOMM'~vI~,,,rI'E~ ! 99~ I 1-3-97.PC 12~!0~7 I~ 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
No. 4 - the developer shall form a Homeowners' Association to maintain all downward
slopes on lots 111, 30-38, and landscape parkways along Margarita Road;
No. 5 - the developer shall provide easements on the Final Map that will allow access
to lots 1-11, 30-38 and the landscaped parkways on Margarita Road for maintenance
by the Homeowners' Association;
No. 57 - Lots 1-11, 30-38, parkway landscaping and open space areas shall be
maintained by an established Homeowners' Association.
Mr. Paul Gonzales, 41820 Marwood Circle, relayed his concerns as to how this
development may directly impact his property (41820 Marwood Circle as well as Lot 4
undeveloped parcel attached to 41820 Marwood Circle) as well as property values.
In response to Mr. Gonzales, Mr. Lohr advised that because Lot 4 has two frontage sides
and, therefore, could not be landlocked by the proposed development; that mailing
labels were provided to the City; that the minimum sized lot would be approximately
7,200 square feet with an average of approximately 9,000 square feet; that the
proposed development should have a positive impact on the neighboring property
values; and that actual home size and sale prices of the proposed development have not
been established.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Principal Engineer Parks advised that as this project
progresses, staff will address the potential impacts the slope along the Long Canyon
may have on the channel characteristics and that staff will investigate the possibility of
constructing a gate to preclude access into the canyon area located between the subject
site and one other development.
For Mr. Gonzales, Principal Engineer Parks commented on measures which would be
undertaken to ensure dust control as a result of grading and advised that construction
hours will be implemented.
MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved to close the public hearing; to adopt the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for PA No.97-0300; to adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for PA
No. 97-0300; to approve Resolution No. 97- , based upon the analysis and findings
contained in the staff report, and to amend Condition Nos. 4, 5, and 57 (as noted on page 5).
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Commissioners Fahey and Miller who abstained.
At this time, Commissioner Miller returned to the dais.
P! ANNINC,, MANAP,,I=R'S R!=PtlRT
None.
R:~LANCO~Ig~7~II-~'97.PC 12/10/97 idb ~
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 3, 1997
pI ANNIN~ rt-tlMMl~l~N rl!~!l.~itlN
None.
AmJrlURNMI=NT
At 7:00 P.M., Acting Chairwoman Slaven formally adjourned this meeting to Monday,
November 17, 1997, at 6:00 P.M.
Linda Fahey, Chairwoman /
Debbie Ubnoske,
Planning Manager
R:~LANCO~! ~l l.l.9?.pC 12/10~'/tdb (~
ATTACHMENT NO. 11
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 2, 1998
R:~ST~9PA.q7.PC4 ~/24/9~ mf 30
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 2, 1998
CA! ! TO ORD~=R
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular session at 6:03 P.M., on
Monday, February 2, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business
Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerfiero, Miller, Slaven, and
Chairwoman Fahey (arrived at 6:06 P.M.).
Absent:
Commissioner Soltysiak.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Principal Engineer Parks,
Attorney Curley,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Associate Planner Fagan,
Assistant Planner Anders, and
Minute Clerk Ballreich.
Because Chairwoman Fahey had not yet arrived, Vice Chairwoman Slaven presided over the
meeting.
PUBLIC COMM!=NTS
None.
COMMISSION BUSINFSS
1. APPROVAl OF AGENDA
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved for the approval of the Agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous
approval (Chairwoman Fahey had not yet arrived and Commissioner Soltysiak absent),
2. APPROVAl OF MINUT~=S - October 6. 1997. and January 5, 1998
MOTION: Commissioner Guerdero moved for the approval of the October 6, 1997, Planning
Commission minutes as written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller and voice
vote of those present reflected unanimous approval (Chairwoman Fahey had not yet arrived and
Commissioner Soltysiak absent).
Temecul,, Pl,,nning, Commission
Februan~ 2. 1996
It was noted that the use of administrative citations is viewed as a conservative measure and
that voluntary compliance would thoroughly be exhausted prior to pursuing the issuance of
citations because of the associated costs.
With regard to temporary on-site storage of recreational vehicles, Commissioner Miller suggested
that the applicable Section be reduced from five consecutive days to three consecutive days in
order to coincide with the Vehicle Code.
In order to properly address this situation and in light of the City's continual growth,
Commissioner Slaven recommended the hidng of an additional Code Enforcement Officer.
Because the language in the older and established CC&Rs does not propedy define recreational
vehicles, Ms. Slaven relayed her opposition to requiring a Homeowners Association to resolve
this issue.
As per speaker cards, Chairwoman Fahey, at this time, welcomed public input from the following
individuals:
Made Dunn 30156 La Pdmavera
(did not speak; concems were addressed during Commission discussion.)
Marcia Watkins - 30152 Villa Alturas
Robert Fischer - 30166 Villa Alturas
Frank Geyer - 40466 Chauncey Way
Bill Gray - 40414 Yardley Court
Betty Condren - 40741 Calle Katerine
Jim Porter - 40221 Tuolomne Court - did not speak;
(did not speak; concerns were addressed during Commission discussion.)
Jack Leathers 42623 Remora Street
Deraid Hansen 30398 Senela Place
John Dedovesh - 39450 Long Ridge Drive - did not speak;
(did not speak; concerns were addressed dudng Commission discussion.)
Dwaine Lewis - 40461 Calle Medusa
Joanne Phillips - 30361 Tradewater Court - did not speak;
(did not speak; concerns were addressed dudng Commission discussion.)
Leo LeBlanc 44041 Quiet Meadow Road
Zillah Rodgers 32124 Corte Carmona
Melvin Merks 32121 Corte Carmona - did not speak
(did not speak; concems were addressed dudng Commission discussion.)
Paul Knowles - 40769 Calle Katedne
(submitted pictures reflecting his concems.)
The above-mentioned individuals noted the following issues/concerns with regard to the storage
of recreational vehicles:
individuals should be permitted a certain amount of on-street parking
time for RVs to accommodate for visitors, loading, unloading, etc.;
safety concems- vehicles blocking the sidewalk, driveway, and as well
-obstructing street visibility;
individuals should utilize a storage facility;
current enforcement needs to be enhanced;
Temecula Plannina Commmsion
February 2. !998
Although the Southside Specific Plan has not been completed, Senior Planner Hogan advised
that the preliminary stages of this Plan seem to indicate that the area south of Sunrise Market will
be zoned Highway/Tourist.
In light of her existing concern with the compatibility of surrounding properties in the area of
discussion, Chairwoman Fahey, echoed by Commissioners Guerdero and Slaven, expressed
concern with the proposed request and how it may further impact an already existing
compatibility issue.
Viewing a color rendering of the proposal, Commissioner Slaven noted that once the upcoming
improvements to the interchange have been completed, the area of discussion will serve as a
main entrance into Old Town and, therefore, further relayed her objection to the proposal
because of the compatibility issue.
P! ~,NNING APP! ICATION NO. PA97-0237 (GEN!=RAI p[ ~.N AMENDM!=NT AND
ZON; CHANG;
Senior Planner Hogan advised that staff is requesting that this item be continued to the March 2,
1998, Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue PA97-0237 to the March 2, 1998, Planning
Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerfiero and voice vote of
those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioner Soltysiak absent).
P! ~.NNING APP! ICATION NO. PA97-0398 (D;VELOPM;NT PLAN)
Planning Commission consideration for the design, construction, and
operation of a 8,684 square foot restaurant with associated parking and
landscaping on 1.51 acres.
RECOMMFNDATION
It is recommended by staff that the Commission adopt the Negative Declaration
for Planning Application No. PA97-0398; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program
for Planning Application No. PA97-0398; and adopt Resolution No. 98-002.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPUCATION NO. PA97-0398 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 8,684 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH
TWO OUTDOOR PATIOS OF 1,185 SQUARE FEET WITH ASSOCIATED
PARK!NG, LANDSCAPING, AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON A 1.51 ACRE
PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
AND YNEZ ROADS KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-011.
Ternecula Pl~,nnina Commission
F~rv 2. 1996
By way of a rendering, Principal Engineer Parks described the peak hour volumes, circulation,
improvements, turning movements, and the widening and upcoming improvements to Ynez
Road, noting the following:
that a traffic signal on the east side of Ynez Road will be installed in
conjunction with the other required improvements;
that access will be limited at Rancho Highland Drive to right in/dght out/
left in;
that a lighted intersection at Rancho Highland Drive would not be feasible
nor practical considering its close proximity to Rancho California Road.
Although this project is not the culprit of the existing traffic problems at the Rancho
Califomia/Ynez Roads intersection, Commissioner Slaven noted that the applicant should not be
hindered by this already existing problem. Ms. Slaven reiterated her concern with the existing
traffic condition and commented on the volume of individuals that to travel through this particular
intersection.
In response to Commissioner Slaven's concern, Principal Engineer Parks noted that the project
will contribute less than 5% increase to existing traffic volumes at the Ynez/Rancho California
Roads intersection. Advising that improvements are being made to accommodate the City's
current growth, he stated that the proposed project has been conditioned to pay a frontage fee
for half of the raised median on Ynez Road and to complete the sidewalk along Ynez Road prior
to occupancy. In the event the required improvements were not completed prior to the opening
of the restaurant, Mr. Parks, for Chairwoman Fahey, advised that the project would not have a
significant impact on the intersection compared to the existing condition and that it would not
change the existing level of service.
Commissioner Slaven reiterated her concern that the proposed project would further worsen an
already congested intersection.
In response to Commissioner Slaven, Commissioner Guerdero noted that once Rancho Highland
Drive improvements are completed, a substantial amount of the traffic associated with turning
movements would be eliminated.
Since the proposed project will have a maximum impact of 3.9% on the intersection,
Commissioner Miller stated that the existing traffic problems are not applicable to the proposed
request.
Although she spoke in support of the architectural design, Chairwoman Fahey noted that it will
not be compatible with the hotel and encouraged the use of adequate landscaping to further
minimize the transition between the two structures.
Assistant Planner Anders advised that the applicant has worked with the City's contracted
landscaping architect to ensure an appropriate landscaping transition between the two
structures.
In light of the fungus problem associated with the California Sycamore tree, Commissioner
Slaven encouraged the applicant to utilize another tree.
Temecu~ PlennJna Cc,,,.,,i~on Felx~w 2. lgge
pl ^NNING MANAGI=R'S R!::PORT
In light of Commissioner Soltysiak's absence, it was the consensus of the Commission to defer
discussion with regard to changing the Planning Commission's meeting date.
P! ANNING COMMISSION nlSCUSSION
A. Commissioner Guerriero requested that a joint meeting with the City Council be scheduled.
B. Commissioner Guen'iem commended Commissioner Slaven on her representation of the City
and the Planning Commission at a recent Planning Commissioners' Workshop.
C. commissioner Miller requested that staff address the number of posted flags located at the
Texaco Station on Front Street.
ADJOURNMFNT
At 8:14 P.M., Chairwoman Fahey formally adjoumed this meeting to Monday. February 23. 1998,
at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ATTACHMENT NO. 12
CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1998
R:~TAFFRPT~49PA97.PC4 6/24/98 mf ~ ]
~ MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AND PLANNING COMMI$~;ION
APRIL 21, 1998
~AI L Ttl nRr~;R
A joint meeting of the City of Temecula City Council and Planning Commission was called to
order at 8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Rft! I P--,'~I_L
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
Councilmember:
Commissioners:
Commissioner:
Comerchero, Undemans, Stone, and Ford.
Robe~s.
Gue~iero, Miller, Soltysiak, and Sisyen.
Fahey.
P! IR! I~- ntlMMI=NT-~
None.
CITY r-OUNCI! ICOMM!.~.~ION R!=PnRT.~
None.
CITY ~-rtUNCI!/nt~MMl-~glnN
1. Review of the P-ity's Ruilt Environment
1.1 Receive the staff report and provide direction.
Community Development Director Thornhill presented the staff report (as per written material
of record). Focusing primarily on the commercial/industrial components, Mr. Thornhill noted
that the City's Design Guidelines were adopted approximately one year ago; that these
Guidelines have been invaluable in guiding the developers; and that these Guidelines do not
include elements such as color and materials. By way of overheads, Mr. Thornhill reviewed
numerous projects which were constructed within the last two years.
With regard to architectural design, Commissioner Slaven relayed her opposition to the
continued use of the two square towers and relayed her support to de-emphasize the use of
corporate colors, noting that corporate colors are not always appropriate for a Center.
Mirmte,,~042198 1
Commissioner Guerriero requested that the Planning Commaselan be given the opportunity to
provide input It an earlier stage with regard to the internal traffic flow of a project. Mr.
Guerriero as well relayed his desire for more landscaped medians.
Concurring with the installation of more landscaped mecEans, Community Development Director
Thornhill advised that the City may not condition · developer to install landscaped medians.
Echoing Commissioner Guerriero's comment, Councilman Stone requested that the Council be
given more lead time with regard to the installation of landscaped medians in order to permit
ample time for communication necessary with various agencies to ensure the accomplishment
of such installations.
Impressed with the diversity of the industrial center, Councilman Stone commended the
Planning Commission on a job well done as well as staff for their diligent efforts associated with
working with the developers in order to obtain additional and/or more mature landscaping for
the City.
Mayor Pro Tern Ford requested that a policy be set, requiring a ~oject to receive parallel review
from the Planning Commission as well as the Traffic/Public Safety Commission to ensure that
traffic issues are properly addressed. In response to this request, Community Development
Director Thornhill noted that such additional review will add processing time to the applicant
and relayed some difficulty with accomplishing this task especially for the industrial buildings
which are generally fast tracked.
In response to Commissioner Miller's concern relative to overall City traffic problems,
Councilman Stone advised that the effects have not yet come to fruition but that problems
have been identified and that solutions are in place. Mr. Stone briefly reviewed upcoming
traffic measures which will go into effect in an effort to mitigate some of these concerns.
Echoing Commissioner Miller's concern relative to City-wide traffic, Commissioner Sisvan
questioned how the Commission could address the cumulative traffic impact while reviewing
a project.
Sharing those concerns noted with regard to City-wide traffic, Councilman Comerchero noted
that the concerns have been identified; that s plan has been implemented to alleviate the
concerns; and that the results of this plan should be effective within a year or two.
In response to Councilman I.indemans, City Manager Bradley advised that by law, the City's
Capital Improvement Program Workshop must be reviewed, each year, by the Planning
Commission prior to it being reviewed by the City Council. With regard to inviting the Planning
Commissioners to the upcoming Capital Improvement Program Workshop, City Manager
Bradley suggested that this invite be extended as well to the Traffic/Public Safety
Commissioners.
Mim~tea~0421SS
2
T~ ~aul~ ~ Caul~,lfiqinnir~ C:MT-- ~fi
An~f :~1. leER
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Senior Planner Hogan advised that after the completion of a
recently City Council-~N)mved Traffic Study, reconsideretlon of the City's Circulation Element
will be forthcoming.
Mayor Pro Tern Ford requested that copies of the City Council Workshop minutes of February
21, 1998, and March 14, 1998, be forwarded to the Planning Commissioners.
In order to further enhance communications between the Council and the Commission,
Councilman Stone suggested the scheduling of more joint City Council/Planning Commission
meeting.
At titis time, the following motion wl8 offered by Coundlmm Unclerams:
Mr~TlttN: Councilman Lindemens moved to diacuu Agenda Item No. 3 out of Mder. The
motion was leeended by Councilman ComMahem end voice vote of those pre~ent reflected
unanimous approval IMayor Robertl abssnt).
3. ~torege of Recre~tionM V~hiclea in RaaiddmtiM 7ones
RFC-ClMMFNnATIC)N
Receive the staff report and provide direction.
Community Development Director Thornhill briefly introduced the Item.
Associate Planner Fagan proceeded with · detailed overview of the staff report (as per
agenda material), noting the following:
that the term 'vehicles" in the Development Code as it relates to recreational
vehicles pertains to commercial vehicles. automobiles, trucks, trailers, motor
trucks, motorcycles, mopeds, campers, camper shells, boats or other large
recreational and commercial equipment;
- that the California Vehicle Code limits on-street parking to 72 hours;
that the City's existing RV storage facilities does not accommodate the
current need;
that if a permit process were approved, · sticker would be issued to the
vehicle; that · change in vehicle would require the owner to reapply for a new
permit;
- that vehicles are not permitted to park in the right-of-way;
that since the adoption of the existing Ordinance in January 25, 1995
(prohibiting long-term parking/storage of recreational vehicles in front yards of
MinutelY0421 SS
Tenon,d- Cltv C~mMil.qq .... na Ca
residential zones), the Ordinance was not enforced to the fullest extent
because of the lack personnel to enforce the Development Code considering
the magnitude of the infraction.
Mr. Fagen briefly reviewed the Code provisions enforced in the City of Fullerton and noted
that staff had reviewed several Code provisions from other cities.
City Attorney Thorsen advised that CC&Rs bind each individual homeowner within the tract
to abide by certain rules end those rules also hove enforcement provisions which are then
enforced by the Homeowners Association end that ordinances are adopted by the City and
enforced by the City, noting that whichever regulation is more stringent will be enforced by
the City or the Homeowners Association.
With regard to entry monument signs posting parking requirements/restrictions throughout
the City, City Manager Bradley, for Mayor Pro Tern Ford, noted that other cities have
installed such signs and that the courts have uphold those cities' enforcement of those
parking requirements.
City Attorney Thorsen advised that the California Vehicle Code preempts all City regulations
of Vehicle Code matters and perking issues, noting that the only time a City may regulate
vehicle and/or parking issues is when it is under direct authority from the Vehicle Code.
Although the Vehicle Code permits the parking of vehicles on City streets up to but not to
exceed 72 hours, Mr. Thorsen stated that other provisions of the Vehicle Code permit
restricting parking during specific time periods (2:00 A.M. to 4:00 A.M., 2-hour parking, 24-
minute parking, etc.).
Because parking on streets would be a Police Department issue, City Manager Bradley
advised that Code Enforcement does not regulate cars/vehicles parked on City streets.
At 9:21 P.M., a recess was called with Mayor Pro Tern Ford reconvening the meeting at
9:31 P.M.
Mr. Don Rohrabacher, 44281 Flores Drive, encouraged the City Council to enforce the
existing Ordinance.
Advising that when he purchased his home, Mr. Ed Sterling, 40466 Cheuncey Way, noted
that the realtor had advised him that no RVs would be permitted unless · special driveway
would be built. Mr. Sterling noted that the presence of RVs negatively impacts the property
in two ways - property devaluation and safety.
Mr. James Horn, 31467 Sonoma Lane, past owner of a RV, noted that no new laws are
necessary and encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing rules and regulations.
Minute=~,042198 4
Voicing his concern relative to on-street RV parking, Mr. Carmine Latrecchia, 31533 Cone
Pacheeo, encouraged the Homeowners to enforce the existing CC&Rs.
Mr. George Marshall, 31880 Cone Poaitaa, auggeoted the implementation of a no parking or
restricting parking to two-hours policy. In light of the growth in this City, Mr. Marshall
encouraged the City to address this matter now.
Mr. Kevin Smith, 31265 Enfield Avenue, owner of a beet, relayed his concurrence with the
72-hour prohibition of on-street parking and relayed his support of In individual being able
to park s licensed vehicle in the driveway and/or paved surface.
Mr. Melvin Marks, 32121 Cone Cartoons, commented on how on-street RV parking
negatively impacts property values.
Ms. Zillah Rodgers, 32124 Cone Caroms, encouraged the City to enforce the existing
Ordinance.
Viewing the aesthetic appearance of RVs as unsightly, Ms. Anna Bale, 29901 CotTa CastSlie,
relayed her opposition to on-street RV parking and encouraged the City Council to enforce
the existing laws.
Being of the opinion that garages should be u~ed, Mr. Bill Gray, 4044 Yardley Court,
encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing Ordinance.
Community Development Director Thornhill advised that the existing Ordinance which
governs the parking of vehicles on private property was adopted January 25, 1995, noting
that prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, the CC&Rs governed such action.
Mr. Don Berg, 41511 Riesling Court, encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance but noted that driveway RV parking should be permitted as long as the sidewalk
is not obstructed and no line-of-sight problems are created.
In light of the City's concern with regard to the aesthetic appearance of the
business/commercial areas (as per Agenda Item No. 1), Ms. Betty Condren, 40741 Calla
Katefine, requested that the same concern be extended to the residential neighborhoods.
By way of a photograph, Ms. Condren relayed her concern with a camper, parked in a
driveway, obstructing her view. She encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance and advised that she lives in a neighborhood which does not have a Homeowners
Association.
In an effort to retain the City's current standards, Mr. Paul KnowMs, 40769 Calla Katefine,
relayed his opposition to a permit system and encouraged the City Council to enforce the
existing Ordinance.
Minute~0421el
Mr. Charles Hlnidey, 31745 Vie Cordoza, In RV owner, relayed his opposition to RV on-
street parking because of the potential safety concern and because of ~esthetic appeareries.
He noted that RVe should be parked out of · neighborhood end should be properly ·crooned.
In deference to his neighbors, Mr. Frank Geyer, 40466 Chauncey Way, RV owner, informed
the Councilmember· that he stores his RV ·t · facility. Because his neighborhood does not
have · homeowners association, he encouraged the Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance to ensure such on-strest parking will not decrease neighboring property values.
Encouraging the City Council to express the same aesthetic concam for residential
neighborhoods as it doe· for business/commercial areas, Ms. Patricia Hall, 27483 Lark
Court, relayed her opposition to on-street RV parking as well as RVs parking in driveways
and, therefore, encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing Ordinance.
Mr. Dwaine Lewis, 40461 Calls Medusa, advised that the current allowable time frame for a
RV to park in the driveway (5 days) is in excess and recommended that this period be
decreased to 24 hours.
Ms. France· Brent, 31448 Certs Montiel, relayed her opposition to on-street RV parking;
noted that additional RV storage facilities should be made available throughout the City; and
encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing Ordinance prior to this problem further
impacting neighborhood property values.
Mr. Tom Harp·tar, 4055 New Town Drive, informed the Councilmembers that his particular
neighborhood does not have · homeowners association; concurred with the comment that
on-street parking could create a safety; recommended that the City Council enforce the
existing Ordinance and that those homeowners associations with CC&Rs be assisted in
ensuring that those CC&Rs are properly enforced.
Mr. Mike Ramey, 40583 Windsor Road, advised that he resides in a neighborhood which
does not have a homeowners association; relayed his support of a driveway permit process
in the event the RVs cannot be parked in the side yard or backyard; and concurred that RVs
should not be parked on local street· because of safety concern·.
Mr. Arlin Somers, 40563 New Town Drive, RV owner, advised that he parks his RV in the
driveway because he is unable to store his RV in the backyard or the side yard of his house.
Mr. Jim Duffey, 40449 Chauncey Way, encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance.
Mr. Don Gravett, 30258 Mira Loma Drive, noted that homeowner associations should be
forced to enforce the CC&Rs and requested that the City not impose a restriction which
would further impact the local streets with RV parking because the homeowners
associations will not be able to resolve the matter.
Minutee~O421SS
~,,,1'1 21. 1~
Opposing on-street RV parking as well as an individual living in a RV, Mr. Hector Mendoza,
30071 Calla Cerranza, noted that s resident should be able to store · RV on his/her own
property.
Ms. Cecilia Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre Drive, noted that, in her opinion, RV$ obstruct
residential views; that in the event of limited Ipace, RVa should not be permitted to park in
tract home areas; and that RV parking decreases the neighborhoods' property values.
Because the existing Ordinance is not consistent with the existing CC&Rs, Mr. Bill Brown,
30959 Del Ray Road, suggested that the existing Ordinance be removed for those areas
where CC&Rs are in existence and that an Ordinance be adopted for those areas with no
CC&Rs. He recommended that the current five-day RV driveway parking allowance be
reduced.
Mr. Deraid Hansen, 20398 Senels Place, concurred with the City's aesthetic requirements
for the business/commercial areas and noted that residential neighborhoods deserve the
same aesthetic requirements.
Mr. Keith Caddy, 40571 New Town Drive, a RV owner, advised that his RV is parked off-
street as well as off the driveway. Mr. Caddy relayed no concern with the existing
Ordinance; noted that s restriction such as no parking between the hours of 2:00 A.M. to
4:00 A.M. may pose s problem for visitors; and stated that if s resident is unable to park his
RV in the backyard or side yard, he should be able to park the RV, in a safe manner, in the
driveway.
Encouraging the City Council to readdress the City's Development Code, Mr. Ed Mourles,
27595 Dandelion Court, e RV owner, advised that he was required to construct a paved
surface under his RV.
Mr. Carl Ross, 43886 Butternut Drive, encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance and noted that the City should aid the homeowners associations in implementing
the CC&Rs.
By way of photographs, Mr. David Micheah, 30300 Churchill Court, spoke in support of a
visitor permit process and noted that RVs should either be properly screened or stored at a
parking facility.
Mr. Paul Jacobs, 32370 Certs Zamora, encouraged the City Council to enforce the existing
Ordinance and voiced no objection to RV visitor parking.
Mr. Bill Bolsom, Meadowview, relayed his support of · permit process.
Referencing · parking prohibition enforced in the City of Mission Viejo, Councilman Stone
spoke in support of e restriction which would prohibit any vehicle in excess of 20' to 25'
from parking during the hours of 2:00 A.M. to 4:00 A.M.
Minutes[0421 as 7
Further c~arifying the Ordinance imposed in the City of Minion Viejo, City ARorney Thorsen
advised that it prohibits. on City streets, parking of vehicles which exceed a particular
length and width with no hour restriction.
Speaking in support of .uch an Ordh~snce, Councilman Stone suggested that such an
Ordinance include the prohibition of parking unattached trailers on City streets at any time.
liecause the City'e current storage facilities could not poHibly meet the existing demand,
Councilman Stone informed the Councilmembers of a City which leases property and then
provides a storage facility to its residents at a lower cost, noting that he would further
explore this matter.
Because those individuals who purchased homes in a homeowners association are~ were
aware of the rules, Councilman Stone encouraged those homeowners associations to
enforce the CC&Rs or to hire a managemen~ company which could accomplish this task.
For the benefit of the homeowners associations, Mr. Stone suggested the scheduling of ·
workshop at which City Attorney Thorsen could provide information with regard to
enforcement to the association.
For those individuals who purposely purchased homes in a non-homeowner association area,
Councilman Stone stated that the existing Ordinance should be amended to include the
following:
no RVs should protrude into the right-of-way;
RVs must be operable;
if space were available to park a RV in the rear or side yard, the owner should
be required to park it there;
no one should be permitted to live in a RV;
no permit process.
Concurring with Councilman Stone's comments, Councilman Lindemane stated that the City
should enforce the Ordinance previously adopted; encouraged the City Council to first
resolve the on-street parking problem, relaying his support of the Ordinance adopted in
Mission Viejo; voiced his objection to a permit process with the exception to those
individuals who are unable to parking a RV in the rear or side yard; and noted that the
existing Development Code should be readdressed.
Mayor Pro Tern Ford noted that the Development Code of 1995 was not properly enforced
because it did not meet the true needs.
Advising that on-site and street parking are two separate issues, City Attorney Thorson
noted that any prohibition of street parking would require the adoption of an Ordinance
which would go into effect 30 days after its second reading, prohibiting the perking of
vehicles in excess of a particular size.
Councilman Stone requested that such an Ordinance include the prohibition of unattached
trailers of any size.
Minute,~04219S S
.iB~ 'J1. 199~
Mr~TlrtN: Councilmen Stone, seconded by Councilmen Comerchero, moved that the City
Attorney dr. ft In Ordinance Ind en Urgency Ordinance which would prohibit the parking of
vehicles of · particular size including unattached trailers of any size end that this Ordinance
be addreded et the April 28, 1998, City Council meeting. Voice vote of those present
reflected unanimous approval with the exceptinn of Mayor Roberts who was absent.
When the Planning Commission reviewed this matter, Commissioner Sicvan informed the
Councilmembers that the Commission did not consider whether or not · neighborhood was
represented by · homeowners association. Because homeowners associations, in her
opinion, do not have the power to resolve difficult issues such as this one, Commissioner
Sisvan stated that it should be the City's responsibility to re.give this issue. Having
managed homeowners associations, Ms. Slavon advised that there are associations which
prohibit the storage of RVs even though the residential lots are large enough to
accommodate such a vehicle.
Community Development Director Thornhill noted that the existing Ordinance permits five
days of driveway parking for visitors, loading, and unloading.
With regard to visitor parking, Commissioner Miller informed the Councilmembers that the
Commission had recommended that this length of time be decreased to two days. Mr.
Miller stated that he would support a temporary permit process and could favor extending
visitor perking to three days.
For those lots which are small, have no side yard, and the RV does not protrude into the
right-of-way area. Councilmen Lindemane suggested that the City grandfather such cases
until the City would be able to provide low-cost RV parking.
With regard to the telephonic permit process, City Manager Bradley advised that several
cities utilize such a process, noting that a RV owner would be entitled to so many per year
and that this process would be at no cost to the resident.
MnTInN: Councilman Unclemane moved to impose a telephonic permit process whereby the
resident must notify the City's Police Department with the license number of the visiting
RV; that the permit be limited to three days and not to exceed four times a year; that the
permit may be renewable once with s six-day maximum at · time; and that the permit
would run with the residence. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero end
voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor
Roberts who was absent.
For Commissioner Sicvan, Community Development Director Thornhill advised that the City
has an existing Code which addresses inoperable vehicles stored in the driveway to which
City Attorney Thorsen as well noted that inoperable vehicles within public view are
governed by the Vehicle Code.
IVlinutes~042198 9
T --uM r'JTv Coufi,44q-,~lnn Camm1,,-'nn
MnTInN: Councilman Comerchero moved that the City Attorney prepare an Ordinance,
which is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at · public hearing and subsequently
reviewed by the City Council, amending Section 17.24.020D)( 1 )(f) of the City's
Development Code by reducing the temporaw perking periods from five days to two days
with the exclusion of automobiles end including all recreational vehicles and that this
Ordinance should as well include a funding mechanism to ensure proper Code enforcement.
Mayor Pro Tern Ford seconded the motion. (This motion was ultimately mJpMseded by m
substitute motion.)
Reiterating his previous comment, Councilman I indemarts noted that if the RV does not
protrude into the right-of-way, if no other storing options are available on the property, and
if the resident has stored the vehicle on his property for years, these circumstances should
be orsndfsthered in until the City is able to provide low-cost storage facilities. Mr.
Lindemens suggested a six-month transition period.
Commissioner Guerriero suggested that the possibility of grandfsthering be explored by the
Planning Commission.
Community Development Director Thornhill suggested that this matter be discussed with
one Councilmember, one Commissioner, and staff; that after review, the matter be
forwarded to the Planning Commission st its May 6, 1998, meeting for review; end that
after review, the matter be forwarded to the City Council for final review.
For those areas with homeowners' associations, Councilman Stone noted that the
associations should govern whether or not parking should be allowed on driveways.
In response to Councilman Stone, Police Chief LaBahn noted that incidents have occurred
throughout the City where the parking of s RV on City streets has created a safety concern.
Councilman Comerchero concurred that those residents in a non-homeowners associations
should be given a transition period.
Commissioner Sisvan concurred that the Planning Commission could address these issues at
the May 6, 1998, Planning Commission meeting for review and then forward · draft
Ordinance to the City Council for review and consideration.
.qlInqTITIITF MnTIrtN: Councilman Stone moved that staff provide bullet points of this
meeting to the Planning Commission so that the Commission would be able to make a
recommendation to the City Council for final review and action. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval
with the exceDtion of Mayor Roberts who was absent.
Minutel%0421 ~!
10
T- =,eu'- ~ r,-,--~4q.nniff,- rr '-:-'-n ,~nHI 21.
At ~s ~m, ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~du Agmdl Or~ ~ dKuu ~em No. 2.
2.1 A~horize I ~rol~ive Tem~rlw Sign Enfor~ment Program.
In light of the time, the following motion was offered:
Mn~N: Councilman Un~emani moved to ~ntinue this Agenda ~em. The motion was
se~nded by Councilman Stone and voice vote of thom pre~nt reflexed unanimous
approval (~r Ro~ a~ent).
CI~ ~NAR~R'~ R~P~RT
None.
~1~ A~RN~'~ R~P~RT
None.
AhJ~! IRNMFNT
At 12:34 A.M., Mayor Pro Tem Ford formally adjourned the C~y Council meeting to
Tuesday, April 28, 1998, at 7:~ P.M.
~ Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
· Jonea, (:~C
ity Clerk ~
Mi~tee~O421gS
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 13
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 6, 1998
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 6, 1998
CA! L TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:09
P.M., on Wednesday, May 6, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Miller, Soltysiak, and
Acting Chairwoman Slaven.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Principal Engineer Parks,
Attorney Curlay,
Associate Planner Fagan
Project Planner De Gange, and
Minute Clerk Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMM!=NTS
Because she has observed that garbage bins are not being properly stored behind gates and out
of public view, Ms. Anna Bale, 29901 Corte Castilia, requested that an ordinance be established
to address the placement of garbage bins.
COMMISSION BUSIN!=SS
1. A~Droval of Agenda
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC H!=ARINGS
2. Planning AIN~lication No. PA97-0447 (Development Plan} - ! ong Machine Shop
Request to construct a 14, 367 square foot industrial building on 1.32 acre site.
DRAFT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission approve the request
as conditioned.
Project Planner De Gange presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the
applicant will comply with the performance standards of the Design Guidelines as outlined in
the Development Code; that although the on-site employee patio area would not be
completely screened from Winchester Road, the existing 20' to 25' landscaped slope area will
negate any view concern; that an access doorway will be located along the west elevstion; and
that a color rendering was only available for the west elevation of the building.
Ms. Vicki Long, applicant, confirmed that the Fire Department has requested the installation of
an access doorway along the west elevation which will exit onto the sidewalk, noting that the
revised landscaping plan will reflect the required sidewalk; that the employee patio area will
have a water feature but that it has not yet been designed; that the building color will be tan;
and that because the building will be sandblasted colored concrete, no paint will be used on the
building with the exception of on the doors and framework. Ms. Long briefly provided
clarification with regard to the use of glass on the building as well as the use of spandrel
panels.
Prior to approving this request, Commissioner Guerriero relayed his desire to receive additional
information with regard to the elevations, the water feature, the landscaping, the visibility of
the patio area from Winchester Road, the proposed colors, and employee accessibility.
Confirming that the landscaping plan will be amended to reflect the required sidewalk, Planning
Manager Ubnoske noted that the proposed site plan will not be amended.
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the project including the recently proposed changes; noted that
the west elevation rendering accurately reflects the proposed color of the building; and
referenced Exhibit G (color and material board) as per Condition No. 8.
in an effort to resolve the Commissioners concerns with regard to color, materials, and
elevation, Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested that the applicant be requested to submit
additional elevation renderings to which the Commissioners could respond at a later date.
Commissioner Guerriero spoke in support of Ms. Ubnoske's suggestion to request the applicant
to submit additional elevation renderings.
Commissioner Miller voiced no objection to the proposed project.
In light of the discussion with staff and the applicant and in light of the submitted color
rendering, Acting Chairwoman Slaven relayed no concern with the proposed project.
Concurring with Acting Chairwoman Slaven's previous comments, Commissioner Soltysiak
noted that the he would not be desirous of delaying this project only to obtain additional
elevation renderings.
DRAFT
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public; to adopt the Negative Declaration
with a Finding of DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA97-0447; to adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0447; to add a Condition of
Approval requiring the submittal of a revised landscaping plan which will reflect the required
access door (as per the Fire Department) on the west elevation; and to adopt Resolution No.
98-013 as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0447 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 14,367 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE, LIGHT
MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING, ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 1.32 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND COLT COURT (27450 COLE
COURT) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-310-070
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exceotion of Commissioner Guerriero who voted no.
Development Code Regulations of on-site storage of vehicles {to include recreational
vehicles) in residential zones
R;COMMI=NDATION
It is recommended by staff that the Planning Commission receive the staff report and
provide recommendations to the City Council regarding modifications to the existing
Development Code Regulations pertaining to the On-Site Storage of Vehicles (to include
recreational vehicles) in residential zones.
Associate Planner Fagan presented the staff report as well as correspondence received from the
public, clarifying that the Cit¥'s existing Code permits the storage of any vehicle within the
rear/sideyard setbacks as long as the vehicle is screened by a five foot fence.
Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that prior to the adoption of the existing Code (1995), the
City adhered to County Ordinance No. 348 which did not include recreational vehicle
regulations.
Because the Code, the Business Professions Code, and the Health Code do not address the
issue of blight, Commissioner Guerriero noted that the Planning Commission should address this
issue.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero's comment, Commissioner Miller noted that he would
not associate blight with the issue of discussion.
In response to.Acting Chairwoman Slaven, Attorney Curley reviewed the Commission's role as
an advisory body to the City Council. He clarified that the City does not enforce CC&Rs, noting
that if certain homeowner association standards are stricter than the City's policy, those
DRAFT
homeowner associations may elect to enforce those standards. If the standards were looser
than the City's standards, the standards of the City would go into effect.
With regard to the issue of blight, Attorney Curley advised that issues such as blight,
maintenance, design, abandoned vehicles, etc. are issues which are currently defined under
Nuisance.
At this time, Acting Chairwoman Slaven opened the public hearing. By way of pictures, the
following individuals, several of which are RV owners, spoke in support of the City's existing
Ordinance with regard to on-site storage of vehicles; encouraged the Commission to
recommend to the City Council that this Ordinance be enforced; and requested that the existing
Ordinance be strengthened to ensure proper enforcement:
Frank Geyer 40466
Jim Porter 40221
John Lynch 32237
Patricia Hall 27483
Bill Gray 40414
Jack Leathers 42623
Charles Hankely 31745
Don Rohrabacher 44281
Anna Bale 29901
Paul Knowles 40469
Dwaine Lewis 40461
Larry Markham 30105
Chauncey Way
Tuolomne Court
Placer Belair
Lark Court
Yardley Court
Remora Street
Via Cordoba
Flores Drive
Corte Caatille
Calle Katerine
Calle Medusa
Cabrillo Avenue
Additional suggestions which were raised by the above-mentioned individuals were as follows:
that no RV parking be permitted between the hours of 2:00 A.M. to 4:00 A.M.
that the-issue of tractor parking, camper shell storage (those not attached to a
truck), and disrepair be addressed in the Ordinance.
During the public hearing, the following individuals relayed their opposition to the existing
Ordinance, noting that this issue should either be addressed by the homeowner associations
or the Cit¥'s existing Nuisance Ordinance; that licensed vehicles in good repair should be
permitted to park in the driveway as long as there is no imposition on the public right-of-way;
that a parking permit process be instituted, at a nominal fee, to accommodate those individuals
unable to park their RVs in the side or rear yard setbacks; and that a time period for
loading/unloading be considered:
Kevin Smith
Ed Elder
Mike Ramey
Ed Mowles
31265 Enfield Lane
42775 San Julian Place
40583 Windsor Road
27595 Dandelion Court
At 8:27 P.M., Acting Chairwoman Slaven called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at
8:36 P.M.
DRAFT
Providing clarification with regard to the definitions of yard and setback, Attorney Curley noted
that the current Ordinance requires the screening of RVs parked in the setback area with a
fence no less than five feet in height.
In light of the testimony received, Commissioner Soltysiak stated that, in his opinion, the on-
site storage of RVs in tract home developments would not be compatible in light of the setback
requirements. With regard to on-site storage of RVs on large acreage lots, Commissioner
Soltysiak noted that proper screening would become an issue.
In of light of previous testimony as well as testimony received this evening, Commissioner
Guerriero relayed his opposition of permitting RV parking in the front yard and recommended
that the existing Ordinance be enforced and strengthened and that specific clarification be
provided with regard to setbacks, screening, paved area, and camper shells. He noted his
opposition to a grand fathering policy; spoke in support of granting a loading/unloading time
period; and relayed his support of hiring an additional Code Enforcement Officer to ensure
proper enforcement of the Ordinance.
Speaking in support of the existing Ordinance, Acting Chairwoman Slaven addressed the public
health and safety issues associated with this matter; stated that the existing Ordinance should
be strengthened to ensure proper enforcement; and concurred that specific definitions with
regard to setbacks, screening, pavement, etc. should be clarified to ensure the Ordinance can
be properly enforced.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to renew the Planning Commission's recommendation to
the City Council to enforce the Ordinance as written and to direct the Attorney and staff to
clarify specific definitions, as previously mentioned, in the Ordinance to ensure proper
enforcement and to resubmit the Ordinance with the clarified definitions to the Planning
Commission for final review at the June 3, 1998, Planning Commission meeting. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PLANNING MANAGFR'S R!=PORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske briefly reviewed and provided information with regard to a request
from Temeku Advertising to amend the earlier proposed and approved building elevations,
noting that staff has no objection to the proposed request.
Senior Planner Hogan highlighted the previously approved structure and reviewed the proposed
elevation changes, noting that the previously approved square footage of the building has not
been amended.
Following extensive Commission discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission
that such a request should be resubmitted to the Planning Department and, therefore, denied
the applicant's request.
DRAFT
COMMISSION!=R R!=PORTS
In response to Commissioner Miller, Planning Manager Ubnoske confirmed that the Planning
Commission reviews structures in excess of 10,000 square feet and that housing tract
elevations are considered at Planning Director Hearings, not at the Planning Commission level.
Expressing a concern with the River Walk Development, Commissioner Miller requested that the
Planning Commission be given the opportunity to consider product review to which Planning
Manager Ubnoske noted that product review is normally reviewed at Planning Director Hearings
and that adding product review to the Commission level would add substantial time to the
process but that she would discuss it with Community Development Director Thornhill. Ms.
Ubnoske noted that the Commissioners may forward any concerns to staff and that these
concerns would be considered during the review of the design guidelines.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that the
Ralph's project is proceeding and that the conditioned signal light will be constructed at the
originally proposed location.
ADJOURNMFNT
At 9:36 P.M., Acting Chairwoman Slaven formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, May
20, 1998, at 6:00 P.M.
Marcia Slaven, Acting Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 14
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 3, 1998
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 1, 1998
27
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-022 '~
/~ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0086 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN),
THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 16,756 SQUARE FOOT
BUILDING ON 1.16 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ENTERPRISE
CIRCLE NORTH, BETWEEN DIAZ ROAD AND JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-281-010
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who abstained.
City of Temecula
Request to recommend changes to the existing Development Code regulations of on-site
storage of vehicles (to include recreational vehicles) in residential zones.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission provide
recommendations to the City Council regarding modifications to the existing
Development Code regulations pertaining to the on-site storage of vehicles (to include
recreational vehicles) in residential zones.
Referencing Draft No. 2, Associate Planner Fagan, in detail, reviewed the staff report (of
record); clarified that the Section referenced throughout the staff report should read 17.24.020;
advised that staff had received one letter and several hot line calls with regard to this issue; and
reiterated that the recommended changes do not pertain to vehicles parked on the street right-
of-way, noting that this issue has been previously addressed by the City Council.
Following extensive Commission discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission
to add the term moving van to Section 17.24.020.D.1.f.
The following individuals relayed their support of the Ordinance and encouraged the
Commission to approve the recommended changes:
Roger English -
Bill Gray -
Jim Porter -
David Greenfield
29683 Stonewood
40414 Yardley Court
40221 Tuolomne Court
32179 Calle Avella
Speaking in opposition to changing the existing Ordinance, Mr. Robert Williamson and Mrs. Geri
Williamson, 30219 Villa Alturas, relayed their difficulty in finding storage facilities within close
proximity of their residence which provides RV storage.
Commissioner Soltysiak, echoed by Commissioner Guerriero and Chairwoman Slaven,
commended staff on completing this very difficult task and thanked the public for their input.
In response to Commissioner Webster's comment relative to the72~hour on-stree~'~p~/i g
prohibition, Associate Planner Fagan advised that the City has in force a City-wide proh~)~
of parking on streets for longer than 72 hours and that action would be taken on tl~'
prohibition on a complaint basis.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution
No. 98-023.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0349,
AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING
TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
At 7:20 P.M., Chairwoman $1aven called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at 7:25
P.M.
10.
Planning Application No. PA9-0205 (Prezoning and Annexation - Vail Ranch and
Redhawk)
Request to prezone and annex approximately 1,995 acres which is comprised of the
Redhawk (Specific Plan No. 217) and Vail Ranch (Specific Plan No. 223) Specific Plan
Areas from unincorporated portions of Riverside County into the incorporated City of
Temecula.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the planning Department that the Planning Commission approve
the request as conditioned.
Community Development Director Thornhill presented the staff report (of record), noting that
this annexation was not initiated by the City; that a petition requesting this annexation was
submitted by several residents of the Redhawk area; that the Vail Ranch residents' rates and
charges would decrease by approximately $40.00 a month and the Redhawk residents' rates
and charges would increase by approximately $13.00 a month, noting that this increase is
primarily because of the amount of slope in the Redhawk area; that the City will have a resident
election on this issue in March of 1999; and that annexation, if approved, should be completed
by July 1999.
By way of a rendering, Project Planner De Gange further commented on the staff report (of
record), providing a detailed overview of the upcoming annexation process; advising that the
annexation of the two Specific Plans must proceed as a unit; that all analysis has been based
on the totality; that this Measure must pass by a two-thirds majority vote of the registered
voters; and that the proposed rates and charges are based on build out and are, therefore, a
maximum.
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
CORRESPONDENCE
cc: Ron Bradley
Gary Thornhill
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
(Fax: 909/694-1999)
Dear Mayor and Councilmen:
I request that you approve the Parking Ordinance as completed by the Planning
Commission.
At your request, the Planning Commission has worked diligently and intelligently to
provide an Ordinance that satisfies the law abiding citizens of Temecula. Through the use
of phone calls, letters and public forum, they have endured both sides of this issue.
This Planning Commission has now provided you a political shield, so that you do not
have to take sides on this decisive isSue. It remains for you to only approve what you
asked the Planning Commission to do: provide an enforceable Ordinance. Do not get
bogged down in micro-management. You have been given the tools, use them.
We voters in Temecula have long memories. How you individually vote on this Ordinance
(as written) will be remembered at election time. Represent the whole City and vote
responsibly. This Council and this City can be the envy and example for others to follow.
Sincerely,
My address:
AUG 0 '-!998
cc: R. Bradley
G. Thornhill
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
(Fax: 909/694-1999)
Dear Mayor and Councilmen:
I request that you approve the Parking Ordinance as completed by the Planning
Commission.
At your request, the Planning Commission has worked diligently and intelligently to
provide an Ordinance that satisfies the law abiding citizens of Temecula. Through the use
of phone calls, letters and public forum, they have endured both sides of this issue.
This Planning Commission has now provided you a political shield, so that you do not
have to take sides on this decisive issue. It remains for you to only approve what you
asked the Planning Commission to do: provide an enforceable Ordinance. Do not get
bogged down in micro-management. You have been given the tools, use them.
We voters in Temecula have long memories. How you individually vote on this Ordinance
(as written) will be remembered at election time. Represent the whole City and vote
responsibly. This Council and this City can be the envy and example for others to follow.
Sincerely,
AUG i 0 1998
: AUG !01998
JACK & CHARLOTTE LEATHERS
42623 REMORA STREET
TEMECULA, CA 92592
August 12,1998
Mr. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Ref.' Parking of Recreational Vehicles on
driveways in Residential Areas.
Dear Mayor Roberts,
It is my understanding that the Council will have the above named subject on their
agenda on August 25, 1998, for action. Since I will probably be out of town I want to
voice my opinion to you via letter, again. First I would like to thank you for handling the
on street parking of like vehicles as you did. There is just one more step that should be
taken and that is the concern of them being parked on driveways.
I have attended the meetings of the Planning Commission concerning this subject
and testified in front of them. My friend, Mr. Bill Gray, and I have also met with Mr.
Matthew Fagen concerning this code, and expressed to him our feelings about this matter.
The Planning Commission has acted and presented you with their recommendation. I am
100% behind this recommendation.
Many people are concerned about the increased parking of RV's, boats, and house
trailers on driveways. In fact there are many more people who do not have RV's, etc. than
there are that do, as I know you realize. If one would ask, most of them would not want
their neighbors parking their equipment in the driveways near them.
I have been president of our Alta Vista Community Association for three years in
the past, and soon found that we had a problem with all these vehicles being parked on
driveways and in the street. We do have CC&R's that prohibit this unless they are parked
behind a fence in their side yard. The problem is the procedure that we have to go
through to enforce these rules. If the violator wants to be difficult it could take many
months to a year to get this resolved. Meanwhile the Association has had the expense of
an attorney, held many hearings, issued fines, and finally when the fines aren't paid placed
a lien on the property. As you can see, this could also cause quite a disruption in the
community. So I am saying to you that this route is not the answer!
The main reasons why I think these vehicles should not be allowed to park in
driveways and on the street are as follows: 1. Properties are devalued.
2. Safety when neighbors back out of their adjacent driveways
and are unable to see moving traffic and kids playing.
3. Undesirable views from one's home, if you live nearby.
4. A junky appearance tends to develop, not only around that residence,
but also in the community.
5. Future development such as the East Side Lake will bring many more
recreational vehicles into this community, and the code will
certainly be tested. If we continue to have addkional parking of these vehicles, the
communities will really look junky and property values will decrease.
I hear that some of the Council Members and other residents are now talking about
property rights. We all enjoy property rights, but some people want to abuse them for
their own selfish benefit. Some people really don't give a hoot about what their neighbors
have to look at, or what their community looks like, I feel that this is what this issue is all
about. Treating your neighbor the way you wouM want to be treated Are many people
forgetting about this rule? I believe they are. When this happens we have to rely on
Codes and Ordnances. That is unfortunate but true!
Speaking of property rights, I believe that when I come home from church on
Sunday, or any other time, I should be able to look out from my property across a well
kept street, neighbors lawns, well kept homes and the beautiful sky that shines in
Temecula. Should these be taken away from me, just because a neighbor buys an RV,
boat, or trailer and thinks he has the right to park it on his driveway, for his total benefit?
What if I would buy a very large truck, one that I kept polished and clean (or the op-
posite), used for my families benefit, and parked it along side of their driveway. WOULD
THEY LIKE ME FOR DOING THAT, probably not. You see, I think property rights
go both ways, don't you?
I think that people owning recreational vehicles should be allowed to have them at
home long enough to service them, load and unload them. A reasonable amount of time
should be allowed for this. If a property owner has a friend visiting with an RV, a permit
should be required for them to park, for any considerable length of time.
As for as the cost of enforcing of the rules, I feel that the City cannot afford not to
get involved, and the cost whatever it is, should be allowed. If the fines are large enough
and the rules made known to everyone, it won't take long until the violations will be at a
minimum. If it takes an additional code enforcement officer, then so be it. We spend
money to make our parks and other parts of the City look well kept and the appearance
superior, so why not spend money to make our total City look the same. It will be
appreciated by most of the residents!
I want to thank you, the total City Council, the City Manager and all the staff for
all the work that has been done to make our City what it is today. I am proud of our City
and thank you for your efforts. May your success continue to grow.
cc:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor Pro Tem
Jeffrey E. Stone, Councilman
Jeff Comerchero, Councilman
Karel F. Lindemans, Councilman
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
Very truly yours,
ITEM
16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~7///, ~
City ATTORNEY /} ~/~
DIRECTOR Of FINANC~ ~
CiTY MANAGER J~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thomhill, Community Development Directo~
August 25. 1998
Adoption of Zoning Regulations and Licensing of Sexually Oriented
Businesses
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act for the
proposed Ordinance; and
2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING REGULATION AND
LICENSING OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH
REGULATIONS
BACKGROUND: On October 22, 1996, November 12, 1996, and September 9, 1997 the City
Council adopted Urgency Ordinances imposing interim standards for Sexually Oriented
Businesses. These interim Ordinances were not adopted in response to requests from a
sexually oriented business requesting to locate in the City. In fact, they were adopted to
clearly identify the areas that these businesses can locate to and the standards that they must
comply with in order to obtain approval from the City for their operation. To date the City has
not received any requests for a sexually oriented business. The interim standards will expire
on October 15, 1998. Therefore, there is a need to adopt the City's permanent regulations for
these businesses.
The proposed Ordinance is different from the Interim Ordinance in two major ways. The first
is that these businesses will be permitted in an overlay zone as opposed to all the parcels within
the Community Commercial and Service Commercial zones. This overlay zone generally covers
all commercially designated zoning districts between 1-15 and the Murrieta Creek north of
Rancho California Road to the City Limits. In addition, some commercially designated parcels
along Winchester Road and Ynez Road intersections have been included.
P:\NAASEH$~d)ULI'$R. CC 8/18/98 m 1
The second difference is that the distance requirements between these businesses and sensitive
uses, and from each other, have been eliminated. This deletion is due to recent court cases
that imply that these restrictions, over time, will reduce the opportunity for these businesses
to conduct their business and would impact their First Amendment rights for free speech.
At staff's request, the City Council continued this item from its August 11, 1998 meeting to
allow staff to prepare a Negative declaration for adoption. Attachment 5 includes the Initial
Study which was used to prepare the Negative Declaration. Previously, the Planning
Commission had approved this item it in their July 15, 1998 meeting with a 3-0 vote. The
Planning Commission had concerns regarding the boundary of the Overlay Zone. In particular,
they recommended eliminating all the area within the overlay zone on the east side of the
freeway. They were concerned about the proximity of the overlay zone to the Temecula Valley
Unified School District Bus Maintenance Facility and the residential areas to the east of the mall
site. In addition, their concerns included the overlay zone's inclusion of the new shopping
center on the northeast corner of Winchester and Margarita and the mall site.
DISCUSSION: The proposed overlay zone includes 290 parcels. The whole City includes 17,370
parcels with 613 commercial parcels and 440 industrial parcels. Therefore, sexually oriented
businesses can locate on over 47 percent of all commercially zoned parcels within the City. With
the Planning Commission's recommendations, the overlay parcels are reduced to 189, which
represents 30 percent of all parcels within the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ordinance No. 98- - Page 3
Planning Commission Staff Reports - Page 4
Planning Commission Minutes - Page 5
Relevant Information Regarding Sexually Odented Businesses - Page 6
Initial Study- Page 7
P:\NAASI~I'I$9~.DULTSR. CC 8/18/98 sn 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
3
ORDINANCE NO 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING REGULATION
AND LICENSING OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
A. It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to provide for the reasonable and
uniform constitutionally permissible regulation of sexually oriented businesses in the City of
Temecula. This City Council Finds that the secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses have
a serious deleterious effect upon adjacent areas, as well as the areas in which they are located. It is
therefore the purpose of this Ordinance to establish criteria and standards for the establishment and
conduct of sexually oriented businesses which will protect the public health, safety, and welfare,
preserve locally recognized values of community appearance, minimize the potential for nuisances
and community disruption related to the operation of sexually oriented businesses, and maintain
local property values.
B. Sexually oriented businesses, due to their nature as shown in the evidence referenced
and incorporated herein, will affect significant changes in vehicular traffic, noise, pedestrian safety,
air quality, parking, neighborhood character, and will create a demand on public safety and
emergency services, and will have an adverse impact upon real estate values in the City of Temecula.
C. It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to establish proper regulations and to
provide for a reasonable number of appropriately located sites for sexually oriented businesses
within the City of Temecula, based upon the following findings:
1. The City Council in adopting this Ordinance takes legislative notice of the
existence and content of the following studies that describe and substantiate the adverse, secondary
effects of sexually oriented businesses:
Austin, Texas:
Indianapolis, Indiana:
Los Angeles, California:
Phoenix, Arizona:
St. Paul, Minnesota:
Garden Grove, California
Upland, California
1986
1984
1977
1979
1989
1991
1992
2. Based on the foregoing studies and the other written and oral evidence
presented to the Planning Commission and this City Council, the City of Temecula finds that:
a. Sexually oriented businesses are linked to increases in the crime rates
of those areas in which they are located and that surround them; and,
b. Both the proximity of sexually oriented businesses to sensitive land
uses and the concentration of sexually oriented businesses tend to result in the blighting and
downgrading of the property located within areas in which they are located.
3. The studies conducted in the identified communities referenced above
demonstrate that the proximity and concentration of sexually oriented businesses adjacent to
residential, recreational, religious, educational, or other sexually oriented businesses can cause other
businesses and residents to move elsewhere; the same effect is believed to be applicable in this City
in light of the circumstances present in our community.
4. The studies conducted in various communities referenced above have
demonstrated that sexually oriented businesses are linked to increases in the crime rates and
blighting of those areas in which they are located and that surround them; the same effect is believed
to be applicable in this City in light of the circumstances present in our community.
5. The special regulation of sexually oriented businesses is necessary to ensure
that their adverse secondary effects will not contribute to an increase in the crime rates or the
blighting or downgrading of the areas in which they are located or surrounding areas. The need for
the special regulation is based on the recognition that sexually oriented businesses have serious
objectionable operational characteristics, particularly when several of them are concentrated under
certain circumstances or located in direct proximity with sensitive uses such as residential zones and
uses, parks, schools, churches, or day care centers, thereby having a deleterious effect upon the
adjacent areas and the subject property.
6. It is the purpose and intent of these regulations to direct the location of
sexually oriented businesses and thereby to prevent such adverse secondary effects. Thus, in order
to protect and preserve the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry, especially minors, the
special regulation of the time, place, and manner of the location and operation of sexually oriented
businesses is necessary.
7. The protection and preservation of the public health, safety and welfare
require that certain distances be maintained between sexually oriented businesses and residential
uses and zones, churches, schools, day care centers, parks and other sexually oriented businesses.
In the preparation of this Ordinance, the City of Temecula has taken the location of residential,
religious, educational, recreational and other sexually oriented businesses into consideration and has
endeavored to minimize the effect that sexually oriented businesses have upon those sensitive areas
and upon the community in general.
8. The need to regulate the proximity of sexually oriented businesses to sensitive
land uses such as residential, religious, educational, recreational and other sexually oriented
P: ~NAASEllS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 2
businesses is documented in studies conducted by other jurisdictions as listed elsewhere in this
Section.
9. The report of the State of Minnesota Attorney General's Working Group on
the regulation of sexually oriented businesses dated June 6, 1986, indicates that:
a. Community impacts of sexually oriented businesses are primarily a
function of two variables, proximity to residential areas and concentration. Property values are
directly affected within a small radius, typically one block, of the location of a sexually oriented
business. Concentration may compound depression of property values and may lead to an increase
of crime sufficient to change the quality of life and perceived desirability of property in a neighbor-
hood; and,
b. The impacts of sexually oriented businesses are exacerbated when
they are located near one another. When sexually oriented businesses have multiple uses (i.e.
theater, bookstore, nude dancing, peep booths), one building can have the impact of several separate
businesses.
10. In consideration of the findings of the report of the State of Minnesota
Attorney General's Working Group on the regulation of sexually oriented businesses dated June 6,
1986, it is appropriate to prohibit the concentration of multiple sexually oriented businesses in order
to mitigate the compounded concentrations as described above.
11. In adopting the regulations set out in this Chapter, it is recognized that
locating sexually oriented businesses covered by this Chapter in the vicinity of facilities frequented
by minors will cause the exposure of minors to adult material which, because of their immaturity,
may adversely affect them. In addition, it is recognized that many persons are offended by the public
display of certain sexual material. Special regulation of these uses is necessary to ensure that these
adverse effects will not contribute to the blighting or downgrading of the surrounding neighborhood
and to an adverse effect on minors.
12. Zoning, licensing and other police power regulations are legitimate
reasonable means of accountability to ensure that the operators of sexually oriented businesses
comply with reasonable regulations and are located in places which minimize the adverse secondary
affects that which naturally accompany the operation.
13. The City of Temecula has a legitimate health concern about sexually
transmitted diseases, including AIDS, which demands reasonable regulations of sexually oriented
businesses in order to protect the health and well-being of its citizens.
14. The City Council has considered the decisions of the United States Supreme
Court regarding local regulation of sexually oriented businesses, including but not limited to: Young
v. American Mini-Theaters, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976) reh. denied 429 U.S. 873; Renton v. Playtime
Theaters, 475 U.S. 41 (1986) reh. denied 475 U.S. 1132; FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215
(1990); and Barnes v. Glen Theater Inc., 111 S.Ct. 2456, 115 L.Ed 2d 504 (June 21, 1991).
P: \NAASE~I$ \ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 3
15. The City Council has determined that locational criteria alone do not
adequately protect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of Temecula and thus certain
requirements regarding the ownership and operation of sexually oriented businesses are in the public
interest.
16. The City Council desires to protect the rights conferred by the United States
Constitution. As such, the Council hereby legislates in a manner that ensures the continued and
orderly development of property within the City and diminishes, to the greatest extent feasible, those
undesirable secondary effects which the aforementioned studies, case law and other testimony have
shown as associated with the development and operation of sexually oriented businesses.
17. It is not the intent of the City Council under this Ordinance nor any provision
thereof, to condone nor legitimize the distribution of obscene material, and the Council recognizes
that state law prohibits the distribution of obscene materials and expects and encourages law
enforcement officials to enforce State of California obscenity statutes against such illegal activities
in Temecula.
18. It is not the intent of this Ordinance to suppress any speech activities
protected by the First Amendment, but to enact a content neutral Ordinance which addresses the
adverse secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses only as to premissable time, place and
manner factors.
19. The provisions of this Ordinance would have no effect on the environment
based on an Initial Study prepared for this Ordinance.
D. On October 22, 1996, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 96-18 entitled "AN
URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT
BUSINESSES UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS
PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS."
Ordinance No. 96-18 was adopted pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858 and
pursuant to Section 65858 had a term of forty five (45) days fi'om its adoption.
E. On November 12, 1996, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 96-20 entitled
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA EXTENDING A
MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT BUSINESSES
UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS PROVIDING FOR
THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS" implements the above
provisions and was intended to extend the moratorium adopted by Ordinance No. 96-18 and adopted
the interim sexually oriented business regulations for the period commencing on the expiration of
Ordinance No. 96-18 and ending 10 months and 15 days thereafter.
F. On September 9, 1997, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 97-15 entitled "AN
URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 4
EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT
BUSINESSES UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS
PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS."
Ordinance No. 97-15 was adopted pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858 and
pursuant to Section 65858 has an expiration date of October 15, 1998.
G. The Planning Department has reviewed the interim regulations and studied revisions
of them for the permanent regulations. This study included the sites available for sexually oriented
businesses under the existing Zoning Ordinance and interim regulations to determine whether such
locations continue to be appropriate for sexually oriented businesses and whether other locations
would be appropriate, the potential concentration of sexually oriented businesses, and their location
to other existing and future sensitive land uses.
H. The City Council finds and determines that uses regulated or prohibited by this
Ordinance would be in conflict with the general plan and with the zoning Ordinance for the location
of sexually oriented businesses. It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to provide for the
reasonable and uniform regulation of sexually oriented businesses in the City of Temecula. It is
recognized that sexually oriented businesses have a serious deleterious effect upon adjacent areas,
as well as the areas in which they are located if not properly regulated. It is therefore the purpose
of this Ordinance to establish criteria and standards for the establishment and conduct of sexually
oriented businesses which will protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, preserve locally
recognized values of community appearance, minimize the potential for nuisances related to the
operation of sexually oriented businesses, and maintain local property values. Uses prohibited by
this Ordinance would affect significant changes in vehicular traffic, noise, pedestrian safety, air
quality, parking, neighborhood character, and will create a demand on public safety and emergency
services, and will have an adverse impact upon real estate values in the City of Temecula.
Section 2.
to read as follows:
Chapter 5.09 is hereby adopted and added to the Temecula Municipal Code
"Chapter 5.09
SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Sections:
5.09.001
5.09.002
5.09.004
5.09.006
5.09.008
5.09.012
5.09.014
Purpose and Intent
Prohibition and Applicability
Definitions
Restricted to Community Commercial Zone
Required Approvals for Establishment and Operation of a Sexually Oriented
Businesses
General Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually
Oriented Businesses
Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses to Allow Customers to Remain on the Premises While Viewing Any
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 5
5.09.016
5.09.018
5.09.020
5.09.022
5.09.024
5.09.026
5.09.028
5.09.030
5.09.032
5.09.034
Live, Filmed or Recorded Entertainment, or While Using or Consuming the Products
or Service Supplied on the Premises
Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses Which Provide Adult Arcades with One (1) or More Viewing Area(s)
Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses Which Provide Live Entertainment Depicting Specified Anatomical
Areas or Involving Specified Sexual Activities
Administration of Conditional Use Permits
Requirements for Sexually Oriented Business License
Administration of Sexually Oriented Business License
Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit Required
Sale/Serving of Alcohol and Persons Under the Influence of Alcohol of Controlled
Substances; Age
Regulations Nonexclusive
Violations/Penalties
Public Nuisance
5,09.001 Purpose and Intent.
The purpose and intent of this Chapter is to regulate sexually oriented businesses which,
unless closely regulated, are demonstrated to have serious secondary effects on the community,
which effects include, but are not limited to, the following: depreciation of property values and
increase in vacancies in residential and commercial areas in the vicinity of Sexually Oriented
Businesses; interference with residential property owners' enjoyment of their property when such
property is located in the vicinity of Sexually Oriented Businesses as a result of increases in crime,
litter, noise and vandalism; higher crime rates in the vicinity of Sexually Oriented Businesses; and
blighting conditions such as low-level maintenance of commercial premises and parking lots, which
thereby have a deleterious effect upon adjacent areas. Special regulation of these businesses is
necessary to prevent these adverse effects and the blighting or degradation of the neighborhoods in
the vicinity of the Sexually Oriented Businesses.
It is neither the intent nor the effect of this Chapter to impose limitations or restrictions on
the content of any communicative material. Similarly, it is neither the intent nor the effect of this
Chapter to restrict or deny access by adults to communication materials or to deny access by the
distributors or exhibitors of Sexually Oriented Businesses to their intended market.
Nothing in this Chapter is intended to authorize, legalize or permit the establishment,
operation or maintenance of any business, building or use which violates any City Ordinance or any
statute of the State of California regarding public nuisances, unlawful or indecent exposure, sexual
conduct, lewdness or obscene or harmful matter or the exhibition or public display thereof.
5.09.002 Prohibition and Applicability
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 6
No business license, Sexually Oriented Business license, land use entitlement, permit
(including building permits), site plan, certificate of occupancy, zoning clearance or other land use
authorization for a Sexually Oriented Business, Adult Arcade, Adult Bookstore, Adult Video Store,
Adult Cabaret, Adult Hotel/Motel, Adult Motion Picture Theater, Adult Theater, or other use
described in this Chapter, as defined in this Chapter, shall be issued, granted or permitted, except as
set forth herein. A Sexually Oriented Business shall be premitted if the business complies with
provisions of this Chapter.
5.09.004 Definitions.
The following words and phrases shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be defined as
follows, unless it is clearly apparent from the context that another meaning is intended.
go
C0
Adult Arcade shall mean an establishment where, for any form of consideration, one or more
still or motion picture projectors, slide projectors or similar machines, for viewing by five
or fewer persons each, are used to show films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides or
other photographic reproductions which are characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction
or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
Adult Bookstore or Adult Video Store shall mean an establishment which dedicates over ten
percent (10%) of its retail floor area to the sale, rental or viewing for any form of
consideration any one or more of the following: Books, magazines, periodicals or other
printed matter, or photographs, films, sculptures, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides or
other visual representations which are characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction or
description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
Sexually Oriented Business shall mean any business establishment, entity or concem which
as a regular and substantial course of conduct performs or operates as an Adult Bookstore,
or Adult Video Store, Adult Theater, Adult Motion Picture Theater, Adult Cabaret, Adult
Motel/Hotel, Adult Arcade, or any other business, entity or concern which as a regular and
substantial portion of its business offers to its patrons products, merchandise, services or
entertainment which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter or activity
depicting, describing or relating to Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical
Areas but not including those uses or activities, the regulation of which is preempted by state
law. Sexually Oriented Business shall also include any establishment which as a regular and
substantial course of conduct provides or allows performers, models, or employees to appear
in any public place dressed only in lingerie.
Adult Cabaret shall mean a nightclub, restaurant or similar business establishment which
regularly features live performances which are characterized by the exposure of Specified
Anatomical Areas or by Specified Sexual Activities, or films, motion pictures, video
cassettes, slides or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by an emphasis
upon the depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical
Areas.
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 7
Adult Hotel/Motel shall mean a hotel or motel or similar business establishment offering
public accommodations for any form of consideration which either:
Provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures,
video cassettes, slides or other photographic reproductions which are characterized
by an emphasis upon the depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or
Specified Anatomical Areas, and advertises the availability of such material by
means of a sign visible from the public right-of-way, or by means of any off-
premises advertising including but not limited to newspapers, magazines, pamphlets,
leaflets, radio or television;
2. Rems, leases, or lets any room for less than a six (6) hour period;
Rents, leases or lets any single room more than twice in a twenty-four (24) hour
period;
Allows a tenant or occupant to sub-rent a guest room for a time period less than ten
(10) hours.
Fo
Adult Material shall mean books, magazines, periodicals or other primed matter, or
photographs, films, sculptures, signs, motion pictures, video cassettes, laser discs, computer
simulations or graphics, slides or other visual representations which are characterized by an
emphasis upon the depiction or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified
Anatomical Areas.
Adult Motion Picture Theater shall mean a business establishment where, for any form of
consideration, films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides or similar photographic
reproductions are shown, and in which a substantial portion of the total presentation time is
devoted to the showing of material which is characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction
or description of Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
Adult Theater shall mean a theater, concert hall, auditorium or similar establishment which,
for any form of consideration, regularly features live performances which are characterized
by the exposure of Specified Anatomical Areas or by Specified Sexual Activities.
I. Establishment of a Sexually Oriented Business includes any of the following:
1. The opening or commencement of any such business as a new business;
The conversion of an existing business, whether or not a Sexually Oriented Business,
to any of the Sexually Oriented Businesses defined herein;
o
The addition of any of the Sexually Oriented Businesses defmed herein to any other
existing Sexually Oriented Business; or
4. The relocation of any such Sexually Oriented Business.
P:\NAASEHS~ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 8
5. The substantial enlargement of Sexually Oriented Business.
Owner or Permit Holder or Permittee. For purposes of this Chapter, Owner, Permit holder
or Permittee shall mean any of the following:
1. The sole proprietor of a Sexually Oriented Business; or
Each general partner of a parmership which owns and operates a Sexually Oriented
Business; or
Each owner often percent (10%) or more of stock in a corporation which owns and
operates a Sexually Oriented Business.
Person shall mean and includes person(s), firms, corporations, partnerships, associations, or
any other forms of business organization or group(s).
"Regular and substantial course of conduct and business shall mean any Sexually Oriented
Business where one or more of the following conditions exist:
The area(s) devoted to the display of Adult Matehal exceeds fifteen percent (15%)
of the total "Display" area of the business or 100 square feet which ever is less.
Display area shall include the area the racks or any other means to display the adult
matehals and the walkways and areas used to view or access the displayed matehals;
or
The business or concern presents any type of live entertainment characterized by an
emphasis on Specified Sexual Activity or Specified Anatomical Areas, or performers,
models or employees appearing in public dressed only in lingerie on any four (4) or
more separate days within any thirty (30) day period; or
mo
Religious Institution shall mean a structure which is used primarily for religious worship and
related religious activities;
School shall mean any child care facility, or an institution of learning for minors, whether
public or private, which offers instruction in those courses of study required by the Califomia
Education Code or which is maintained pursuant to standards set by the State Board of
Education. This definition includes a nursery school, kindergarten, elementary school, junior
high school, senior high school or any special institution of Education, but it does not include
a vocational or professional institution of higher education, including a community or junior
college, college or university.
O. Specified Anatomical Areas shall include any of the following:
Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttocks,
anus or female breasts below a point immediately above the top of the areola; or
P: \NAASEHS \ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 9
Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely
covered.
P. Specified Sexual Activities shall includes any of the following:
The fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, anus
or female breasts;
2. Sex acts, actual or simulated, including intercourse, oral copulation or sodomy;
3. Masturbation, actual or simulated;
Excretory fimctions as part of or in connection with any of the activities described
in subdivisions 1 through 3 of this subsection; or
Striptease, or the removal of clothing, or the wearing of transparent or diaphanous
clothing, including models dressed only in lingerie or other coverings to the point
where Specified Anatomical Areas are exposed.
Substantial Enlargement shall mean the increase in floor area occupied by the Sexually
Oriented Business by more than ten percent (10%) of the floor area in use for that purpose
in existence on the effective date of this Chapter.
Transfer of Ownership or Control of A Sexually Oriented Business shall mean and include
any of the following:
1. The sale, lease or sublease of the business; or
The transfer of securities which constitute a controlling interest in the business,
whether by sale, exchange or similar means; or
o
The establishment of a trust, gift or other similar legal devise which transfers
ownership or control of the business, including the transfer by bequest or other
operation of law upon the death of a person possessing the ownership or control.
Police and Fire Departments shall mean the agencies providing police and fire services for
the City of Temecula, whether by contract or as employees.
5.09.006 Restricted to Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone.
No Sexually Oriented Business shall be established, expanded, or conducted except in the Sexually
Oriented Business Overlay Zone. Further, Sexually Oriented Businesses shall only be established,
expanded, or conducted in accordance with all the regulations contained in this Chapter.
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 1 0
5.09.008 Required Approvals for Establishment and Operation of a Sexually Oriented
Business.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, engage in, conduct or carry on any Sexually
Oriented Business within the City of Temecula unless the person operating the Sexually
Oriented Business obtains:
A Sexually Oriented Business License pursuant to Sections 5.09.022 through
5.09.024 of this Chapter; and
A Conditional Use Permit for the location where the Sexually Oriented Business will
be conducted, pursuant to Sections 5.09.010 through 5.09.020 of this Chapter.
The applications for the Sexually Oriented Business License and the Conditional Use Permit
shall be submitted concurrently by the applicant and shall not be accepted by the City unless
all submittal requirements for both applications are included with each application. The
Director of the Community Development and the Director of Finance, respectively, shall
establish the submittal requirements for the Conditional Use Permit and the Sexually
Oriented Business License.
Each employee of a Sexually Oriented Business or an independent contractor working at a
Sexually Oriented Business three or more times during a continuous thirty (30) day period
shall obtain a Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit pursuant to Section 5.09.026,
prior to working at the Sexually Oriented Business. The application shall include all
submittal requirements as determined by the Director of Finance before being accepted by
the City for processing.
5.09.012 General Requirements for Approval of All Conditional Use Permits for Sexually
Oriented Businesses.
In addition to the general zoning requirements applicable in the subject zoning district, a
Conditional Use Permit shall be obtained by a Sexually Oriented Business. The following additional
requirements contained in the Section shall be satisfied by all Sexually Oriented Businesses and shall
be included a conditions of approval for any approved Conditional Use Permit. Furthermore, the
special requirements ("Special Requirements") contained in this Section and in Sections 5.09.14
through 5.09.018 shall be applied to the specified businesses included in these sections. The
inclusion of the Special Requirements into the conditions of approval shall serve to conclusively
satisfy the findings required by Sections 17.04.01Elb and 17.04.010Eld of the City of Temecula's
Development Code. The following requirements shall be included in the approval of all Conditional
Use Permits for Sexually Oriented Businesses:
A. The application shall be sworn to be true and correct by the Owner under penalty of perjury;
The building, structure, equipment and location used by the business which is the subject of
this application complies with the requirements and standards of the health, zoning, fire and
safety laws of the State of California and of the City of Temecula;
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 1 1
Except as specifically provided in this Chapter, the Sexually Oriented Business shall comply
with all other zoning, parking, development and design standards applicable to the zone in
which the business is located.
Maximum occupancy load, fire exits, aisles and fire equipment shall be regulated, designed
and provided in accordance with the latest Uniform Fire and Building Codes adopted by the
City of Temecula or imposed on the City by operation of law.
Eo
The facility shall be operated by a person with a valid Sexually Oriented Business License
at all times.
All the employees of Sexually Oriented Businesses as required by Section 5.09.026 shall
operate with valid Sexually Oriented Business Permits.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall not be located, in whole or in part, within any portable
structure.
No Sexually Oriented Business shall be open or operating during the hours from 10:00 p.m.
to 8:00 a.m.
No person under the age of eighteen (18) years shall be permitted within the premises at any
time.
The building entrance to a Sexually Oriented Business shall be clearly and legibly posted
with a notice indicating that minors are precluded from entering the premises. The notice
shall be constructed and posted to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development or designee.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall not conduct or sponsor any special events, promotions,
festivals, concerts or similar activities which would foreseeably increase the demand for
parking spaces beyond the approved number of parking spaces for the business.
Permanent barriers shall be installed and maintained to screen the interior of the premises
from public view for each door used as an entrance/exit to the business.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall not conduct any massage, acupuncture, figure
modeling, tattooing, acupressure or escort services and shall not allow such activities on the
premises.
No exterior door or window on the premises shall be propped or kept open at any time while
the business is open, and any exterior windows shall be covered with opaque covering at all
times. Such opaque covering shall be subject to approval of the Director of Community
Development.
P:\NAASEHS\ADU'LT.CA 8/17/98 klb 12
No Adult Material shall be displayed in such manner as to be visible from any location other
than within the premises occupied by the Sexually Oriented Business.
No Sexually Oriented Business shall be operated in any manner that permits the observation
of any maternal depicting, describing or relating to Specified Sexual Activities or Specified
Anatomical Areas from any public way or from any location outside the building or area of
such establishment. This provision shall apply to any display, decoration, sign, show
window or other opening.
Qo
All indoor areas of the Sexually Oriented Business within which patrons are permitted,
except rest rooms, shall be open to view at all times.
All on-site signage shall conform to the relevant provisions of both the Temecula Municipal
Code and the Zoning Ordinance regarding signs. All Adult Materials and activities shall be
concealed from view from any public right-of-way, parking lot or neighboring property.
So
No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used by a Sexually Oriented Business for the
amplification of sound to a level discernible by the public beyond the walls of the building
in which such use is conducted or which violates any noise restrictions as may be adopted
by the City of Temecula.
To
Lighting shall be required which is designed to illuminate all exterior grounds including
off-street parking areas to a minimum of 2.0 foot candles serving such use for the purpose
of increasing the personal safety of patrons and reducing the incidents of vandalism and then.
The lighting shall be shown on the required lighting plans and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Community Development.
All areas of Sexually Oriented Businesses accessible to patrons except as otherwise required
by law for adult motion picture theaters, and as provided in Section 5.09.016 (Adult
Arcades), and Section 5.09.018 (Sexually Oriented Businesses with live entertainment) shall
be illuminated at least to the extent of twenty (20) foot-candles, minimally maintained and
evenly distributed at ground level. Such lighting shall be shown on the required lighting plan.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall provide and maintain separate rest room facilities for
male patrons and employees and female patrons and employees. Male patrons and
employees shall be prohibited from using the rest room(s) for females, and female patrons
and employees shall be prohibited from using the rest room(s) for males, except to carry out
duties of repair, maintenance and cleaning of the rest room facilities. The rest rooms shall
be free from any Adult Material. Rest rooms shall not contain television monitors or other
motion picture or video projection, recording or reproduction equipment. The foregoing
provisions of this paragraph shall not be applicable to a Sexually Oriented Business which
deals exclusively with sale or rental of Adult Material which is not used or consumed on the
premises, such as an Adult Bookstore or Adult Video Store, and which does not provide rest
room facilities to its patrons or the general public.
P: \NAASE~qS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 13
Landscaping shall conform to the standards established for the zone, except that, if the
Sexually Oriented Business is the sole use on a lot, no planting shall exceed thirty (30)
inches in height, except trees with foliage not less than six (6) feet above the ground.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall comply with the restrictions regarding the sale/serving
of alcohol and persons under the influence of alcohol and controlled substances contained
in Section 5.09.028 of this Chapter.
5.09.014 Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses to Allow Customers to Remain on the Premises While Viewing Any Live, Filmed
or Recorded Entertainment, or While Using or Consuming the Products or Service Supplied
on the Premises.
Sexually Oriented Businesses which allow customers to remain on the premises while viewing any
live, filmed or recorded entertainment, or while using or consming the products or service supplied
on the premises shall provide at least one (1) security guard on duty outside the premises, patrolling
the grounds and parking areas, at all times while the business is open or customers remain on the
premises. If the occupancy limit of the premises is greater than fifty (50) persons, an additional
security guard shall be on duty inside the premises. The security guard(s) shall be charged, the
operator, with preventing violations of law and enforcing compliance by patrons with the
requirements of this Chapter, and notifying the City Police Chief and Building Official of any
violations of law observed. Any security guard required by this subparagraph shall be uniformed
in such manner so as to be readily identifiable as a security guard by the public and shall be duly
licensed as a security guard as required by applicable provisions of state and/or local law. No
security guard required pursuant to this subparagraph shall act as a door person, ticket seller, ticket
taker, or admittance person while acting as a security guard hereunder.
5.09.016 Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses which provide Adult Arcades with One (1) or More Viewing Area(s).
Sexually Oriented Businesses which provide adult arcades with one (1) or more viewing area(s) shall
conform with these additional requirements:
Upon application for a Conditional Use Permit for an Adult Arcade, the applicant shall
provide a floor plan of the premises showing a plan thereof specifying the location of one (1)
or more manager's stations, the location of all overhead lighting fixtures and designating any
portion of the premises in which patrons will not be permitted. A manager's station may not
exceed twenty eight (28) square feet of floor area with no dimension greater than seven (7)
feet. The diagram shall also designate the place at which the Sexually Oriented Business
License will be conspicuously posted.
No alteration in the configuration or location of a manager's station(s) may be made without
the prior approval of the City Planning Commission.
It shall be the duty of the Owner(s) to ensure that at least one (1) employee is on duty and
situated at each manager's station at any time that a patron is present inside the Adult Arcade.
P: \NAASEHS \ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 14
The interior of the Adult Arcade shall be configured in such a manner that there is an
unobstructed view from at least one manager's station of every area of the Adult Arcade to
which any patron is permitted access for any purpose, excluding rest rooms. If the Adult
Arcade has two (2) or more manager's stations designated, then the interior of the Adult
Arcade shall be configured in such a manner that there is an unobstructed view of each area
of the Adult Arcade to which any patron is permitted access for any purpose, excluding rest
rooms, from at least one (1) of the manager's stations. The view required in this subsection
must be by direct line of sight from the manager's station.
E0
It shall be the duty of the Owner(s) and all employees present on the Adult Arcade to ensure
that the individual viewing area specified in subsection 5.09.016 (6) remains unobstructed
by any doors, walls, persons, merchandise, display racks or other matedhals at all times and
to ensure that no patron is permitted access to any area of the Adult Arcade which has been
designated as an area in which patrons will not be permitted in the application filed pursuant
to subparagraph 5.09.016 (1) of this paragraph.
No Individual Viewing Area may be occupied by more than one (1) person at any one time.
"Individual Viewing Area" shall mean a viewing area designed for occupancy by one (1)
person. Individual Viewing Areas of the Adult Arcade shall be operated and maintained
without any hole or other opening or means of direct communication or visual or physical
access between the interior space of two (2) or more Individual Viewing Areas.
No individual viewing area shall contain booths, stalls, or partitioned portions to be used for
the viewing of adult material or other forms of entertainment, unless such individual viewing
areas containing booths, stalls or partitioned portions have at least one (1) side open to the
manager's station and visible to such manager's station. Any booth, stall or partitioned
portion of an individual viewing area authorized under this subparagraph 5.09.016 (7) shall
be constructed so as to allow twelve (12) inches of open space between the bottom of the
stall or partition and the floor. Such open space shall remain unobstructed at all times.
The Adult Arcade shall be equipped with overhead lighting fixtures of sufficient intensity
to illuminate every place to which patrons are permitted access but such lighting shall not
be of an intensity as to prevent the viewing of the adult material. Such lighting shall be
shown on the required lighting plan. It shall be the duty of the Owner(s) and it shall also be
the duty of all employees present on the Adult Arcade to ensure that the illumination
described above is maintained at all times that any patron is present on the Adult Arcade.
5.09.018 Special Requirements for Approval of Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented
Businesses Which Provide Live Entertainment Depictink, Specified Anatomical Areas or
Involvink' Specified Sexual Activities.
Sexually Oriented Businesses which provide live entertainment depicting Specified
Anatomical Areas or involving Specified Sexual Activities shall conform with the following
additional requirements:
P: ~NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 15
No person shall perform live entertainment for patrons of a Sexually Oriented Business
except upon a stage at least eighteen (18) inches above the level of the floor which is
separated by a distance of at least six (6) feet from the nearest area occupied by patrons, and
no patron shall be permitted within six (6) feet of the stage while the stage is occupied by an
entertainer. "Entertainer" shall mean any person who is an employee or independent
contractor of the Sexually Oriented Business, or any person who, without any compensation
or other form of consideration, performs live entertainment for patrons of a Sexually
Oriented Business.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall provide separate dressing room facilities for
entertainers which are exclusively dedicated to the entertainers' use.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall provide an entrance/exit to the Sexually Oriented
Business for entertainers which is separate from the entrance/exit used by patrons.
The Sexually Oriented Business shall provide access for entertainers between the stage and
the dressing rooms which is completely separated from the patrons. If such separate access
is not physically feasible, the Sexually Oriented Business shall provide a minimum four-foot
(4') wide walk aisle for entertainers between the dressing room area and the stage, with a
railing, fence or other barrier separating the patrons and the entertainers capable of (and
which actually results in) preventing any physical contact between patrons and entertainers.
Fixed rail(s) at least thirty (30) inches in height shall be maintained establishing the
separations between entertainers and patrons required by this paragraph.
No entertainer, either before, during or after performances, shall have physical contact with
any patron and no patron shall have physical contact with any entertainer either before,
during or after performances by such entertainer.
The Adult Arcade shall be equipped with overhead lighting fixtures of sufficient intensity
to illuminate every place to which patrons are permitted access with an illumination of not
less than twenty (20.0) foot candles as measured at the floor level. This lighting shall be
shown on the required lighting plan.
5.09.020 Administration of Conditional Use Permits.
In addition to the provisions set forth in Section 17.04.010 of the Temecula Development
Code, the Conditional Use Permits for Sexually Oriented Businesses shall be administered according
to the following:
Time Limits For Action On Conditional Use Permit. An application for a Conditional Use
Permit shall be approved or denied by the Planning Commission, based upon the satisfaction
or failure to satisfy the standards applicable thereto, within forty-five (45) calendar days of
the determination that the application is complete by the Department of Community
Development.
Appeals. The City Council on appeal, shall approve an application for a Conditional Use
Permit for a Sexually Oriented Business upon findings that the Applicant has met all the
applicable requirements and performance standards of this Chapter. An Appeal shall be
conducted pursuant to Section 17.03.090 of the Temecula Development Code with the sole
exception that an appeal for an Adult Conditional Use Permit shall be heard within thirty
(30) days of its filing with the City Clerk. Any proceeding to seek judicial review of any
City Council decision shall be brought in accordance with the provisions of the Temecula
Municipal Code and applicable State Law.
Suspension and Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit. In addition to the provisions set
forth in Section 17.03.080, the Planning Commission may suspend or revoke any Condi-
tional Use Permit if it is found that any of the following conditions exist in addition to the
criteria set forth in this Chapter:
1. The operation conducted by the permittee does not comply with all applicable laws,
including, but not limited to, the City's building, health, zoning and fire ordinances,
the requirements of this Chapter, the Conditional Use Permit, or Sexually Oriented
Business Permit, or is in violation of, or has violated, one or more of the conditions
of approval of the Conditional Use Permit or;
2. That the approved use has been substantially enlarged without City approval;
That the approved use has been partially or wholly converted to another Sexually
Oriented Business without City approval;
That the Conditional Use Permit has not been utilized within six months of its
issuance; or
5. The Sexually Oriented Business License has been suspended or revoked.
5.09.022 Requirements for Sexually Oriented Business License.
In addition to the general Business License requirements contained in Chapter 5.04 of the
Temecula Municipal Code, the following additional general requirements contained in this Section
shall be satisfied by all owners seeking a Sexually Oriented Business License. Failure to comply
with each and all of applicable requirements shall be grounds for revocation of the Sexually Oriented
Business License issued pursuant to this Chapter. The following requirements shall be included in
the approval of all Sexually Oriented Businesses:
If a Sexually Oriented Business is owned by a corporation, parmership, limited liability
company or parmership, or other business entity, then each person owning or having control
of ten percent (10%) or more of the entity shall also obtain a Sexually Oriented Business
License. Such persons may apply for the Sexually Oriented Business License on the same
application and application process as the entity which will own the Sexually Oriented
Business.
P: \NAASEHS \ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 17
No Sexually Oriented Business License shall be sold, transferred, or assigned by any License
holder, or by operation of law, to any other person, group, partnership, corporation or any
other entity, and any such sale, transfer or assignment, or attempted sale, transfer, or
assignment shall be deemed to constitute a voluntary surrender of such License, and such
License shall be thereafter null and void.
A Sexually Oriented Business License held by an individual in a corporation or parmership
is subject to the same rules of transferability as contained above.
Do
Any change in the nature or composition of the Sexually Oriented Business from one type
of Sexually Oriented Business use to another type of Sexually Oriented Business use shall
also render the Sexually Oriented Business License null and void.
5.09.024 Administration of Sexually Oriented Business License.
Application For Sexually Oriented Business License. Applicants for such licenses shall file
a written, signed and verified application or renewal application on a form provided by the
Finance Department. Such application shall contain:
1. The name and permanent address of Applicant.
The name and business address of the Applicant. If the Applicant is a corporation,
the name shall be exactly as set forth in its Articles of Incorporation and the
Applicant shall show the name and residence address of each of the officers, directors
and each stockholder owning no less than ten percent (10%) of the stock of the
corporation. If the Applicant is a partnership, limited liability company or limited
liability parmership, the application shall show the name and residence address of
each of the members, including limited partners with a ten percent (10%) or more
interest;
o
A detailed description of the manner of providing any proposed entertainment,
including type of entertainment and the number of persons engaged in the
entertainment;
4. Proposed hours of operation;
The name or names of the person or persons having the management or supervision
of Applicant's business and of any entertainment;
A statement of the nature and character of Applicant's business if any, to be carried
on in conjunction with such entertainment; and
o
Whether the Applicant or any of the other Owners of the Sexually Oriented Business
has had a previous permit under this Ordinance or other similar ordinances from this
City or another city or county denied, suspended or revoked, including the name and
location of the Sexually Oriented Business for which the permit was denied,
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 1 8
suspended or revoked, as well as the date of the denial, suspension or revocation, and
whether the Applicant or any other individuals listed pursuant to this Section has
been a parmer in a parmership or an officer, director or principal stockholder of a
corporation that has permitted under this Section whose permit has previously been
denied, suspended or revoked, including the name and location of the Sexually
Oriented Business for which the permit was denied, suspended or revoked as well as
the date of denial, suspension or revocation.
Whether the Applicant or any other Owner holds any other permits and/or licenses
for a Sexually Oriented Business from another city or county, and if so the names and
locations of such other permitted businesses.
If a person who wishes to operate a Sexually Oriented Business is an individual,
he/she must sign the application for a permit as Applicant. If a person who wishes
to operate a Sexually Oriented Business is other than an individual, each individual
who has a ten percent (10%) or greater interest in the business must sign the
application for a permit as an Applicant. If a corporation is listed as Owner of a
Sexually Oriented Business or as the entity which wishes to operate such a business,
each individual having a ten percent (10%) or greater interest in the corporation must
sign the application for a permit as an Applicant.
10.
Each application shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee for filing or renewal
in an amount determined by resolution of the City Council, which will be used to
defray the costs of investigation, inspection and processing of such application.
Investigation. Upon receipt of a Sexually Oriented Business License application by the City
Finance Department and upon payment of the non-refundable application fee:
The City Finance Department shall immediately stamp the application as received
and shall immediately thereafter send photocopies of the application to the Police
Department and any other City departments or other agencies responsible for
enforcement of health, fire and building codes and laws.
Each department or agency shall promptly conduct an investigation of the Applicant,
application and the proposed Sexually Oriented Business License in accordance with
its responsibilities under law and as set forth in this Chapter.
The investigation shall be completed within twenty-five (25) days of receipt of the
application by the City Finance Department.
At the conclusion of its investigation, each department or agency shall indicate on
the photocopy of the application its approval or disapproval of the application, date
it, sign it, and, in the event it disapproves, state the reasons therefor.
o
A department or agency shall disapprove an application if it finds that the proposed
Sexually Oriented Business will be in violation of any provision of any statute, code,
Ordinance, regulation or other law in effect in the City.
P: ~NAASEHS~ADLrLT. CA 8/17/98 klb 19
Co
Decision By Director of Finance on Application For Sexually Oriented Business License.
The Director of Finance or designee shall grant or deny an application for a License within
forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of its proper filing. Upon the expiration of the
forty-fifth (45th) day, unless the Applicant requests and is granted a reasonable extension of
time, the Applicant shall be permitted to begin operating the business for which the License
is sought, unless and until the Director of Finance notifies the Applicant of a denial of the
application and states the reason (s) for that denial.
Grant of Application For Sexually Oriented Business License. The Director of Finance shall
grant the application unless one or more of the reasons set forth in Section 5.09.024 E.
(Denial of Application for License) below is present. The License, if granted, shall state on
its face the name of the person or persons to whom it is granted, the expiration date, and the
address of the Sexually Oriented Business. The permit shall be posted in a conspicuous
place at or near the entrance to the Sexually Oriented Business so that it can be easily read
at any time.
Denial of Application of Sexually Oriented Business License. If the Director of Finance
denies the application, he/she shall notify the Applicant of the denial in writing and state the
reason(s) for the denial. If a person applies for a License for a particular location within a
period of twelve (12) months from the date of denial of a previous application for a License
at the location, and there has not been an intervening change in the circumstances which
could reasonably be expected to lead to a different decision regarding the former reasons for
denial, the application shall be denied.
The Director of Finance shall deny the application for any of the following reasons:
The Applicant, his or her employee, agent, partner, director, officer, stockholder or
manager has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of
material fact in the application for a license or in any report or record required to be
filed with the Police Department, Fire Department or other department of the City;
The Applicant has had any type of Sexually Oriented Business License revoked by
any public entity within two (2) years of the date of the application;
The Applicant, manager or any agent or employee of the Sexually Oriented Business
has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor which offense is classified by the
State as an offense involving sexual crimes against children, sexual abuse, rape,
kidnaping, distribution of obscene material or material harmful to minors,
prostitution or pandering or as a result of the operation of the operation of a Sexually
Oriented Business, whether or not the conviction is in Califomia, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the violation of any crime requiring registration under
California Penal Code Section 290, or any violation of Penal Code Sections 243.4,
261,261.5,264.1,266, 266a through 266k, inclusive, 267, 286, 286.5,288, 288a,
311 through 311.10, inclusive, 314, 315, 316, or 647, whether or not such a
conviction is being appealed;
P: \NAASEI-IS ~ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 20
4. The Applicant is under eighteen (18) years of age;
5. The required application fees have not been paid; or
Inspection. An Applicant or Licensee shall permit representatives of the Police Department,
Health Department, Fire Department, Code Enforcement, Community Development
Department, or other City Departments or Agencies to inspect the premises of a Sexually
Oriented Business for the purpose of insuring compliance with the law, at any time it is
occupied or opened for business. A person who operates a Sexually Oriented Business, or
his or her agent or employee, is in violation of the provisions of this Section if he or she
refuses to permit such lawful inspection of the premises at any time it is occupied or opened
for business.
Renewal. Application for renewal shall be made at least thirty (30) days before the
expiration date, and when made less than thirty (30) days before the expiration date, the
expiration of the License shall not be affected. In addition to the provisions set forth in
Chapter 5.04.160 of the Temecula Municipal Code for a renewal of applications, all
proposed changes since the filing of the initial application shall be specified in the renewal
application.
Denial of Renewal of Business Licenses. If the Director of Finance denies renewal of the
License, the Applicant shall not be issued a License for one (1) year from the date of denial.
If, subsequent to denial, the Director of Finance finds that the basis for denial of the renewal
of the License has been corrected, the Applicant shall be granted a License if at least ninety
(90) days have elapsed since the date denial became final.
Revocation of Sexually Oriented Business License. After an investigation, notice and
hearing, the Director of Finance shall revoke an existing Sexually Oriented Business License,
as shall be found necessary to assure the preservation of the public health and safety, if the
evidence presented establishes that one or more of the following conditions exist:
The building, structure, equipment and location used by the business fail to comply
with the requirements or fail to meet the standards of the health, zoning, fire and
safety laws of the State of California, or of the ordinances of the City of Temecula;
The Licensec, his or her employee, agent, partner, director, officer, stockholder or
manager has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of
material facts in the application for a license, or in any report or record required to
be filed with the Police or other department of the City;
0
The Licensee has had any type of Sexually Oriented Business License revoked by any
public entity within three (3) years of the date the license was issued;
There is not a responsible adult on the premises to act as a manager at all times in
which the business is open or operating;
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 21
The Licensec is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor which offense is classified by
the State as an offense involving sexual crimes against children, sexual abuse, rape,
kidnaping, distribution of obscene material or material harmful to minors,
prostitution or pandering or as a result of the operation of the operation of a Sexually
Oriented Business, whether or not the conviction is in California, including, but not
necessarily limited to the violation of any crime requiring registration under
California Penal Code Section 290, or any violation of Penal Code Sections 243.4,
261,261.5, 264.1,266, 266a through 266k, inclusive, 267, 286, 286.S, 288, 288a,
311 through 311.10, inclusive, 314, 315, 316 or 647 whether or not the conviction
is being appealed;
If, on one (1) or more occasions within a twelve (12) month period, a person or
persous has (have) been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor for an offense set forth
in subsection (5) above, which offense has occurred as a result of or has originated
from such persons' activity on the premises or property on which the Sexually
Oriented Business is located, and the person or persons were employees, contractors
or agents of the Sexually Oriented Business at the time the offenses were committed;
If the Licensec or any employee of the Licensec has knowingly allowed prostitution,
or solicitation for prostitution, on the premises;
The Sexually Oriented Business has operated in violation of any of the requirements
of this Chapter and,
If the violation is of a continuous nature, the business continues to be
operated in violation of such provision for more than ten (10) days following
the date written notice of such violation is mailed or delivered to the
Licensec, or
If the violation is of a noncontinuous nature two (2) or more additional
violations of the same provision, or four (4) or more violations of any other
of the provisions, of this Chapter occur (regardless of whether notice of each
individual violation is given to Licensee within any twelve (12) month
period;
9. That the subject Sexually Oriented Business has employed minors; or
10. That the Conditional Use Permit for the use has been suspended or revoked.
11.
Applicants for a License under this Section shall have a continuing duty during the
term of the license to promptly supplement application information required by this
Section in the event that the information changes in any way from what is stated on
the application. The failure to comply with the continuing duty within thirty (30)
days from the date of such change, by supplementing the application on file with the
Director of Finance or his/her designee, shall be grounds for revocation of a License.
P: ~NAASE~S \ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 22
Hearing on Revocation of Sexually Oriented Business License. Upon determining that
grounds for license revocation exist, the Director of Finance shall furnish written notice of
the proposed revocation to the Licensec. Such notice shall summarize the principal reasons
for the proposed revocation; shall state that the Licensec may request a hearing within fifteen
(15) calendar days of the postmarked date on the notice which shall be delivered both by
posting the notice at the location of the Sexually Oriented Business and by sending the notice
by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Licensec as that name and address as
appears on the License. It is the Licensee's responsibility pursuant to Section 5.09.024 to
notify the City of any changes in address of the Licensee during the time the permit is in
effect. Within fifteen (15) calendar days after the later of the mailing or posting of the notice
the Licensee may file a request for hearing with the Director. If the request for a hearing is
filed within fifteen (15) calendar days of the mailing or posting of the notice referred to
herein, the Director shall transmit the request to the Planning Commission, and the hearing
shall be provided.
Upon receipt of a written request for a heating, the Planning Commission shall conduct a
heating. The Planning Commission shall conduct a hearing within thirty (30) calendar days
of the filing of such request by the Licensee. Notice of time and place of the heating shall
be given to the Licensec by personal service or via certified mail, postage prepaid, at least
fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the date set for the public heating. At the heating,
the Licensec and the City shall be entitled to present relevant evidence, testify under oath and
call witnesses who shall testify under oath. The Planning Commission shall not be bound
by the statutory rules of evidence in the hearing, except that hearsay evidence may not be the
sole basis for the determination of the Planning Commission.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission shall decide whether the grounds
for revocation exist and shall submit a written report to the Director of Finance. Such written
report shall contain a brief summary of the evidence considered and shall state findings,
conclusions and directives to the Director of Finance regarding whether the License is to be
revoked. All such reports shall be filed with the City Clerk and shall be public records. A
copy of such report shall be forwarded by certified mail, postage prepaid, to the Licensee on
the day it is filed with the City Clerk. If the Planning Commission determines that any
grounds for revocation exist, as provided in Section 5.09.024 I. of this Chapter, the Director
of Finance, based upon the report of the Planning Commission or, if no hearing was
requested by the Licensee, based upon the report of the City staff, shall immediately revoke
the Sexually Oriented Business License. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be
appealable to the City Council by the filing of a written appeal with the City Clerk within
fifteen (15) calendar days following the date of mailing of such decision. A timely filed
appeal shall vacate the decision of the Planning Commission. Any such appeal shall be a de
novo public hearing held in the manner and within the time limitations set forth in Section
5.09.020.A. The decision of the City Council upon appeal, or the decision of the Planning
Commission in the absence of a timely appeal, shall be final and conclusive.
No application for a Sexually Oriented Business License shall be accepted or processed for
any person, corporation, partnership, or member thereof, or any other entity for which a
P:~NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 2 3
Sexually Oriented Business License has been revoked within the preceding three (3) year
period.
5.09.026 Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit Required.
Each Employee of a Sexually Oriented Business or an independent contractor working at a
Sexually Oriented Business three or more times during a thirty (30) day period shall obtain a
Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit issued by the Police Chief.
Each person requesting a Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit shall submit a
verified application on a form provided by the Police Department which shall contain the
name and permanent address of the applicant, the name and address of the location where
the applicant will work, a statement as to whether the applicant is over the age of eighteen,
and such other information as the Police Chief requires in order to decide whether the permit
can be granted.
B. The Police Chief shall grant the license unless he or she finds:
1. The Applicant is under the age of eighteen;
The Applicant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor which offense is
classified by the State as an offense involving sexual crimes against children, sexual
abuse, rape, kidnaping, distribution of obscene material or material harmful to
minors, prostitution or pandering or as a result of the operation of a Sexually
Oriented Business, whether or not the conviction is in California, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the violation of any crime requiring registration under
California Penal Code Section 290, or any violation of Penal Code Sections 243.4,
261,261.5,264.1,266, 266a through 266k, inclusive, 267, 286, 286.5, 288, 288a,
311 through 311.10, inclusive, 314, 315, 316, or 647, whether or not such a
conviction is being appealed.
The Sexually Oriented Business at which the Applicant proposes to work is not
properly permitted or licensed within the City of Temecula; or
The Applicant has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of
material fact in the application or any document required to be filed with the Police
Department.
Within two (2) business days of an application being filed and determined complete by the
Police Chief, the Police Chief shall approve or deny a Temporary Sexually Oriented
Business Employee Permit for the Applicant. If a Temporary Sexually Oriented Business
Employee Permit is approved it shall be in effect for a maximum of forty five (45) days or
until such time as a permanent permit is issued. If the Temporary Sexually Oriented
Business Employee Permit or the Permanent Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit
is denied, the Police Chief shall notify the Applicant in writing and shall state the reasons for
the denial.
P: \NAASEFIS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 24
The permanent Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit shall be valid for a period of
one (1) year.
The Applicant who has been issued Sexually Oriented Business Employee Permit shall have
a continuing duty to report to the Police Chief any change in the facts disclosed in the initial
application.
5.09.028. Sale/Servin~ of Alcohol and Persons Under the Influence of Alcohol of Controlled
Substances; Age.
It is unlawful to sell, serve or permit the consumption of alcohol or controlled substances in
a structure occupied by a Sexually Oriented Business.
It is unlawful for any person under the age of eighteen (18) years or any person obviously
under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance to enter or remain on the premises
of a Sexually Oriented Business at any time. A sign giving notice of this provision shall be
prominently posted at each entrance to the premises of the Sexually Oriented Business.
It is unlawful for any person having responsibility for the operation of a Sexually Oriented
Business, to allow any person under the age of eighteen (18) years to enter or remain on the
premises of the business, whether or not such person having responsibility for the operation
of a Sexually Oriented Business has knowledge that the person is under the age of eighteen
(18) years; or to allow any person obviously under the influence of alcohol or a controlled
substance to enter or remain on the premises of the business.
For the purposes of this Section, the Licensee of a Sexually Oriented Business License, when
present on the premises, and the manager or other person(s) in charge of the premises, are
persons having responsibility for the operation of the business. As used in this Section
"controlled substance" means those substances defined and described in Health and Safety
Code Section 11007 as it now exists or may be subsequently amended or renumbered.
5.09.030 Re~,ulations Nonexclusive.
The regulations set forth in this Chapter are not intended to be exclusive and compliance
therewith shall not excuse noncompliance with any other regulations pertaining to the operation of
Sexually Oriented Businesses as adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula.
5.09.032 Violations/Penalties.
Any firm, corporation or person, whether as principal, agent, employee or otherwise,
violating or causing the violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and any conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not more than one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months, or by both such
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 2 5
fine and imprisonment. Any violation of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a separate
offense for each and every day during which such violation is committed or continued.
5.09.034 Public Nuisance.
In addition to the penalties set forth at Section 5.09.032 above, any Sexually Oriented
Business which is operating in violation of this Chapter or any provision thereof is hereby declared
to constitute a public nuisance and, as such, may be abated or enjoined from further operation."
Section 3. Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby repealed.
Section 4. Table 17.03.010 in Section 17.03.010 of the Temecula Development Code
is hereby revised to read, in words and figures, as follows:
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 2 6
TABLE 17.03.010 PLANNLNG AND ZONING APPROVAL AUTHORITY
Approval
Admin. ** Planning City Council
Approval Community Commission
Developmgnt
Director
Conditional Use
Permits-All
Sexually
Oriented
Businesses
X
Section 5. Section 17.08.020 of the Temecula Development Code is hereby revised to
add subsection (H) thereto, to read as follows:
"Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone (ABO). It is the intent of the Sexually
Oriented Business Overlay Zone to designate areas that Sexually Oriented Businesses may be
considered provided that they meet the provisions of Chapter 5.09 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
This area is generally away from residential uses and is primarily located within the commercial
districts."
Section 6. Subsection "A" of Table 17.08.030 of Section 17.08.030 of the Temecula
Development Code, is amended to read as follows:
Table 17.08.030 Schedule. of permitted Uses
Commereial/Omee/ladusirial Districts
Sexually Oriented Businesses-subject to
Chapter 5.09 of the Temecula Municipal Coden
C C C
4. Only Within Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone
Section 7. The City of Temecula Zoning Map is amended to add a Sexually Oriented
Business Overlay Zone, as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 2 7
EXHIBIT A
SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSIESSES OVERLAY ZONE
,.( ABO )
SP
ABO )
· (, ABO
A00 )
Section 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or word of this Ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decisions shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance, and each and all provisions
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the provisions may be declared to be invalid.
Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance as an urgency
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.
P: \NAASEHS\ADULT. CA 8/17/98 klb 2 8
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _th day of ,1998.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk, CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 98-__, was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on
,1998, by the following vote
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk, CMC
P:\NAASEHS\ADULT.CA 8/17/98 klb 2 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
4-
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 15, 19.98
Planning Application No. PA97-0293
Zoning Regulation and Licensing of
Sexually Oriented Businesses
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh
04'I 1A/,4L
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department Staff r,ecommends
the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- based upon the Analysis
and Findings contained in the Staff Report
BACKGROUND
On October 22, 1996, November 12, 1996, and September 9, 1997 the City Council adopted
Urgency Ordinances imposing interim standards for Sexually Oriented Businesses. These
interim Ordinances were not adopted in response to requests from a sexually oriented business
requesting to locate in the City. In fact, they were adopted to clearly identify the areas that
these businesses can locate to and the standards that they must comply with in order to obtain
approval from the City for their operat;on. To date the City has not received any requests for
a sexually oriented business. The interim standards will expire on October 15, 1998.
Therefore, there is a need to adopt the City's permanent regulations for these businesses.
The proposed Ordinance is different from the Interim Ordinance in two major ways. The first
is that these businesses will be permitted in an overlay zone as opposed to all the parcels within
the Community Commercial and Service Commercial zones. This overlay zone generally covers
all commercially designated zoning districts between 1-15 and the Murrieta Creek north of
Rancho California Road to the City Limits. In addition, some commercially designated parcels
along Winchester Road and Ynez Road intersections have been included (refer to Attachment
2).
The second difference is that the distance requirements between these businesses and sensitive
uses, and from each other, have been eliminated. This deletion is due to recent court cases
that imply that these restrictions, over time, will reduce the opportunity for these businesses
to conduct their business and would impact their First Amendment rights for free speech.
DISCUSSION
After a careful review of the land use patterns in the City and review of legal matters, staff is
proposing to create an overlay zone which permits Sexually Oriented Businesses with a
Conditional Use Permit. This overlay zone is appropriate for these businesses since it gives
them abundant opportunities to co-exist with other commercial activities. The overlay zone
P:~NAASEHS~ADULT.CC 7/8/98 sn 1
includes 290 parcels. The whole City includes 17,370 parcels with 613 commercial parcels and
440 industrial parcels. Therefore, sexually oriented businesses can locate on over 47 percent
of all commercially zoned parcels within the City. Areview of the City'sbase map indicates
that most of these parcels have adequate access.
In addition, these uses will, for the most part, be separated from residential areas. The freeway
acts as a physical barrier between residential uses and the potential location of these uses. The
remainder of the overlay zone is the northeast and southeast corners of Ynez and Winchester
Roads. The northeast side is physically separate from the residential area and the southeast
side includes a small area that abuts a residential area but which is physically separated by
Margarita Road.
The attached Ordinance ensures potentially available sites for sexually oriented businesses,
requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission to ensure compliance
with the standards of this ordinance. It further protects the residents of the City from
secondary impacts of these businesses.
FINDINGS
The Planning Commission in adopting this Ordinance takes legislative notice o'f the
existence and content of the following studies that describe and substantiate the
adverse, secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses:
Austin, Texas:
Indianapolis, Indiana:
Los Angeles, California:
Phoenix, Arizona:
St. Paul, Minnesota:
Garden Grove, California
Upland, California
1986
1984
1977
1979
1989
1991
1992
Based on the foregoing studies and the other written and oral evidence presented to the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula finds that:
Sexually oriented businesses are linked to increases in the crime rates of those
areas in which they are located and that surround them; and,
bo
Both the proximity of sexually oriented businesses to sensitive land uses and the
concentration of sexually oriented businesses tend to result in the blighting and
downgrading of the property located within areas in which they are located.
The studies conducted in the identified communities referenced above demonstrate
that the proximity and concentration of sexually oriented businesses adjacent to
residential, recreational, religious, educational, or other sexually oriented businesses can
cause other businesses and residents to move elsewhere; the same effect is believed to
be applicable in this City in light of the circumstances present in our community.
The studies conducted in various communities referenced above have demonstrated that
sexually oriented businesses are linked to increases in the crime rates and blighting of
those areas in which they are located and that surround them; the same effect is
P:~lqAASEHS~ADULT. CC 7/8/9g sn 2
believed to be applicable in this City in light of the circumstances present in our
community.
The special regulation of sexually oriented businesses is necessary to ensure that their
adverse secondary effects will not contribute to an increase in the crime rates or the
blighting or downgrading of the areas in which they are located or surrounding areas.
The need for the special regulation is based on the recognition that sexually oriented
businesses have serious objectionable operational characteristics, particularly when
several of them are concentrated under certain circumstances or located in direct
proximity with sensitive uses such as residential zones and uses, parks, schools,
churches, or day care centers, thereby having a deleterious effect upon the adjacent
areas and the subject property.
It is the purpose and intent of these regulations to direct the location of sexually
oriented businesses and thereby to prevent such adverse secondary effects. Thus, in
order to protect and preserve the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry,
especially minors, the special regulation of the time, place, and manner of the location
and operation of sexually oriented businesses is necessary.
The protection and preservation of the public health, safety and welfare require that
certain distances be maintained between sexually oriented businesses and residential
uses and zones, churches, schools, day care centers, parks and other sexually oriented
businesses. In the preparation of this Ordinance, the City of Temecula has taken the
location of residential, religious, educational, recreational and other sexually oriented
businesses into consideration and has endeavored to minimize the effect that sexually
oriented businesses have upon those sensitive areas and upon the community in general.
The need to regulate the proximity of sexually oriented businesses to sensitive land uses
such as residential, religious, educational, recreational and other sexually oriented
businesses is documented in studies conducted by other jurisdictions as listed elsewhere
in this Section.
The report of the State of Minnesota Attorney General's Working Group on the
regulation of sexually oriented businesses dated June 6, 1986, indicates that:
ao
Community impacts of sexually oriented businesses are primarily a function of
two variables, proximity to residential areas and concentration. Property values
are directly affected within a small radius, typically one block, of the location of
a sexually oriented business. Concentration may compound depression of
property values and may lead to an increase of crime sufficient to change the
quality of life and perceived desirability of property in a neighborhood; and,
The impacts of sexually oriented businesses are exacerbated when they are
located near one another. When sexually oriented businesses have multiple uses
(i.e. theater, bookstore, nude dancing, peep booths), one building can have the
impact of several separate businesses.
P:~,IAASEHS'u~tDULT. CC ?/8/~)8 sn ~
10.
In consideration of the findings of the report of the State of Minnesota Attorney
General's Working Group on the regulation of sexually oriented businesses dated June
6, 1986, it is appropriate to prohibit the concentration of multiple sexually oriented
businesses in order to mitigate the compounded concentrations as described above.
11.
In adopting the regulations set nut in this Chapter, it is recognized that locating sexually
oriented businesses covered by this Chapter in the vicinity of facilities frequented by
minors will cause the exposure of minors to adult material which, because of their
immaturity, may adversely affect them. In addition, it is recognized that many persons
are offended by the public display of certain sexual material. Special regulation of these
uses is necessary to ensure that these adverse effects will not contribute to the
blighting or downgrading of the surrounding neighborhood and to an adverse effect on
minors.
12.
Zoning, licensing and other police power regulations are legitimate reasonable means of
accountability to ensure that the operators of sexually oriented businesses comply with
reasonable regulations and are located in places which minimize the adverse secondary
affects that which naturally accompany the operation.
13.
The City of Temecula has a legitimate health concern about sexually transmitted
diseases, including AIDS, which demands reasonable regulations of sexually oriented
businesses in order to protect the health and well-being of its citizens.
14.
The Planning Commission has considered the decisions of the United States Supreme
Court regarding local regulation of sexually oriented businesses, including but not limited
to: Young v. American Mini-Theaters, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976) reh. denied 429 U.S.
873; Renton v. Playtime Theaters, 475 U.S. 41 (1986) reh. denied 475 U.S. 1132;
FW/PBS. Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990); and Barnes v. Glen Theater Inc., 111
S.Ct. 2456, 115 L. Ed 2d 504 (June 21, 1991).
15.
The Planning Commission has determined that Iocational criteria alone do not adequately
protect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of Temecula and thus
certain requirements regarding the ownership and operation of sexually oriented
businesses are in the public interest.
16.
The Planning Commission desires to protect the rights conferred by the United States
Constitution. As such, the Council hereby legislates in a manner that ensures the
continued and orderly development of property within the City and diminishes, to the
greatest extent feasible, those undesirable secondary effects which the aforementioned
studies, case law and other testimony have shown as associated with the development
and operation of sexually oriented businesses.
17.
It is not the intent of the Planning Commission under this Ordinance nor any provision
thereof, to condone nor legitimize the distribution of obscene material, and the Council
recognizes that state law prohibits the distribution of obscene materials and expects and
encourages law enforcement officials to enforce State of California obscenity statutes
against such illegal activities in Temecula.
18.
It is not the intent of this Ordinance to suppress any speech activities protected by the
First Amendment, but to enact a content neutral Ordinance which addresses the adverse
P:~IA.ASEHSXA.DULT.CC 7/8/98 an 4
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses only as to premissable time, place and
manner factors.
The provisions of this Ordinance would have no effect on the environment and is
therefore exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). This section indicates that
CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect
on the environment. It also states, that where it can be seen with certainty that there
is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the
environment, the activity is not subject to the provisions of CEQA.
On October 22, 1996, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 96-18 entitled "AN
URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IMPOSING
A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT BUSINESSES
UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS PROVIDING FOR
THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS." Ordinance No. 96-18
was adopted pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858 and pursuant to
Section 65858 had a term of forty five (45) days from its adoption.
On November 12, 1996, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 96-20 entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA EXTENDING A
MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT BUSINESSES
UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS PROVIDING FOR
THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS" implements the above
provisions and was intended to extend the moratorium adopted by Ordinance No. 96-18
and adopted the interim sexually oriented business regulations for the period
commencing on the expiration of Ordinance No. 96-18 and ending 10 months and 15
days thereafter.
On September 9, 1997, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 97-15 entitled "AN
URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ADULT
BUSINESSES UNLESS SUCH BUSINESSES COMPLY WITH INTERIM STANDARDS
PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT BUSINESSES AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS."
Ordinance No. 97-15 was adopted pursuant to California Government Code Section
65858 and pursuant to Section 65858 has an expiration date of October 15, 1998.
The Planning Department has reviewed the interim regulations and studied revisions of
them for the permanent regulations. This study included the sites available for sexually
oriented businesses under the existing Zoning Ordinance and interim regulations to
determine whether such locations continue to be appropriate for sexually oriented
businesses and whether other locations would be appropriate, the potential
concentration of sexually oriented businesses, and their location to other existing and
future sensitive land uses.
The Planning Commission finds and determines that uses regulated or prohibited by this
Ordinance would be in conflict with the general plan and with the zoning Ordinance for
P:XNAASEHS~DULT.CC 7/8/98 sn 5
the location of sexually oriented businesses. It is the purpose and intent of this
Ordinance to provide for the reasonable and uniform regulation of sexually oriented
businesses in the City of Temecula. It is recognized that sexually oriented businesses
have a serious deleterious effect upon adjacent areas, as well as the areas in which they
are located if not properly regulated. It is therefore the purpose of this Ordinance to
establish criteria and standards for the estab. lishment and conduct of sexually oriented
businesses which will protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, preserve
locally recognized values of community appearance, minimize the potential for nuisances
related to the operation of sexually oriented businesses, and maintain local property
values. Uses prohibited by this Ordinance would affect significant changes in vehicular
traffic, noise, pedestrian safety, air quality, parking, neighborhood character, and will
create a demand on public safety and emergency services, and will have an adverse
impact upon real estate values in the City of Temecula.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
City Council Ordinance No. 98-__- Blue Page 14
Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone (ABO) - Blue Page 44
2. Relevant Information Regarding Sexually Oriented Businesses - Blue Page 45
P:'~IAASEHS~DULT. CC 7/8/98
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
In response to Commissioner Naggar, Mr. Wayne Phelps, 27574 Commerce Cent~
a¢ vised that neither the private office nor the basement would be leased out :1,
v¢ d no objection to the imposition of a condition prohibiting the lease of the and/or
nt. With regard to landscaping on the southern elevation, Mr. Ph, voiced no
ob the planting of larger and/or additional trees in order to miti¢ appearance
of this ex wall.
Both Naggar and Chairwoman Slaven commended the , .~,~a job well
done. '...,':.~' 1 ~..
'. ' ~
With regard to landsca on the southern elevation, Webster sugge,~t')eed to
retain the 15 gallon trees ;uggested that two or three ad~ trees be planted along the
southern elevation of the ~g.
Planning Manager Ubnoske
landscaping along the southern
that the concern with regard to
would b ;layed to the landscape architect.
It was the consensus of the Commi.,
approval of the increased FAR.
with staff's findings with regard to the
Commissioner Naggar moved to close ring and to adopt the Negative Declaration
for Planning Application No. PA98- and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for
Planning Application No. PA98-0 and adopt lution No. 98-026 approving Planning
Application No. PA98-0154 base port the Analysis ~dings contained in the Staff Report
and subject to the Condition Approval with the on that additional landscaping be
provided along the south~ elevation of the building to mitigate the massive
appearance of this expan., wall.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-026
A RES( OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
APPR(: G PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0154
THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 14,703
B ING ON ONE ACRE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
OF SOLANA WAY, IN THE YNEZ CENTER COMMERCIAL
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-750-012
TEMECULA
iNT PLAN),
]E FOOT
motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected
~pproval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Soltysiak who were
6. Planning Application NO. PA97-0293 (Sexually Oriented businesses Ordinance)
Request an ordinance providing for the zoning regulation and licensing of
sexually oriented businesses and making findings in connection with the
need for such regulations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the reque..st.
Planning Manager Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (of record), briefly hig,,hlighting the
changes being proposed to the existing interim Ordinance: .?':
to allow adult businesses in an Overlay Zone permitting such u.,se's?in
Commercial Zones; the permissibility of such uses is legally impof~a'~to
ensure the defensibility of this Ordinance; ~;j
to eliminate the distance requirement between such uses and other
sensitive uses.
In response to Commissioner Webster who requested that the term tingerie be more
specifically defined, Attorney Curley noted the difficulty in providing a specific definition
and as well commented on the landscaping requirement for such uses. Mr. Curley noted
that the City is required to provide a reasonable number of alternate sites within the
community for First Amendment expression to be conducted upon; that the crafting of the
Overlay Zone was believed to include enough of the buffering from the secondary issues as
a result of such uses from the residential areas or other areas; that the proposed Ordinance
attempts to provide the greatest degree of Constitutional privilege, as required by the
Courts, without going beyond that, and that the proposed Ordinance is solid in its
foundation and, therefore, would be fully defensible and would preclude the possibility of an
open door policy.
Relaying his objection to permitting such uses near schools, Commissioner Webster
suggested to delete and add the following properties from the Overlay Zones:
delete the property northeast of Winchester Road and Margarita Road (Ralph's
Center);
delete the entire Mall property;
add the Service Commercial area between the freeway and Ynez Road and
Rancho California Road and the Guidant property.
Attorney Curley noted that adult business uses would be permissible in the Overlay Zone
but clarified that such uses would not be mandated.
At this time, Chairwoman Slaven opened the public hearing.
Since minors will be frequenting the Mall without parental supervision, Chairwoman Slaven
relayed her objection to including the mall property in the Overlay Zone.
Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, relayed his strong opposition to any pornography-type
related business within City limits; viewed such uses as a blight to the City; noted that the
City is a family town and such uses should not be permitted; and commended the Planning
Commission and Planning Department staff on their efforts associated with this issue.
In response to comments made by Mr. Leon Segal, 28924 Front Street, A~torney Curley
noted that although the City may not content regulate, the City may reg.u.!at.e the secondary
effects of such uses and that licensing requirements for sexually oriented:businesses (retail)
differ from those for a live-entertainment busines~ -:"'"
Concurring with the deletion of Winchester Road and Margarita Road as well as tl~.e entire
Mall property from the Overlay Zone, Chairwoman Slaven suggested that the City Council
consider other opportunities and utilize the freeway as a natural barrier for such uses.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution
No. 98-027 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING REGULATION AND LICENSING OF
SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Soltysiak who were absent.
$ MANAGER'S REPORT
In re., :o a previously noted concern by Chairwoman Slaven, Planning Manag~
advised Redhawk and Vail Ranch area is currently and will continue t, a serviced
by Fire Station after the annexation. Ms. Ubnoske noted that of Services
indicates sufficient to accommodate the annexation but tha building continues
and density increases, of a new Fire Station within the of the annexation
v/ill be required.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:28 Chairwoman Slaven for
Commission at 6:00 P.M.
adjourned this meeting to the August 5, 1
nning
Mar Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING
SEXUALLY
ORIENTED BUSINESSES
UNDER SEPARATE COVER
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
INITIAL STUDY
7
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
o
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Adoption of Zoning Regulations and Licensing of
Sexually Oriented Businesses
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400
City-wide
Project Sponsors Name and Address:Same as No. 2
Multiple designations
Multiple designations
Adoption of Zoning Regulations and Licensing of
Sexually Oriented Businesses
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: N/A
Other public agencies whose approval
is required: None
P:'qqAASEHS'~297PA98.PC 1 .doc 1
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
[ ] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services
[ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
[X] None
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature Date
Printed Name
P:XNAASEHS~297PA98.PC 1.doc 2
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rupture?
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land?
h. Expansive soils?
i. Unique geologic or physical features?
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and mount of surface ranoff?.
b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding?
c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body7
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[l
[1
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[l
[]
[1
[]
[]
No
Impact
[x]
[xl
IX]
[x]
ix]
IX]
[x]
[x]
ix]
ix]
IX]
IX]
[x]
[x]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
[x]
IX]
IX]
ix]
P:\NAASEHS~297PA98.PC 1 .doc 3
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
g.
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[x]
[x]
ix]
[x]
ix]
IX]
IX]
ix]
IX]
[x]
IX]
IX]
IX]
[x]
[x]
IX]
IX]
IX]
IX]
ix]
[x]
IX]
P:\NAASEHS~297PA98.PC 1 .doe 4
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
10.
a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards?
e. Increase f'tre hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
12.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
P:~NAASEHS'C297PA98.PC l.dog 5
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[l
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[l
[l
[1
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
ix]
ix]
[x]
[xl
ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
IX]
[x]
[x]
ix]
IX]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[xl
ix]
ix]
ix]
[x]
ix]
[x]
IX]
[x]
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
[ ] [ ] [ ] [x]
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
[ ] [ ] [ ] [x]
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
[ ] [ ] [ ] IX]
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? [ ]
[ ] [] IX]
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
[ ] [ ] [ ] [x]
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None.
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The overlay zone overlaps the existing commercial zones; therefore, no additional environmental impacts are
associated with the adoption of the overlay zone. In addition, the ordinance sets standards for adult businesses t
make tem more compatible with their surrounding uses; therefore, no additional environmental impacts are
anticipated with the adoption of the new standards. The proposed Ordinance will not have an impact to the
environment in the following areas: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems, Water
Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise,
Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation. No mitigation
measures will be required.
P:hNAASEHS~97PA98.PC l.doe 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Directo ~r-~
August 25, 1998
Sexually Oriented Businesses, Item Number 16
The City Attorney has recommended revising the following sections based on new information
that has just become available to him:
1. In Section 1 .C.(1 ) add "New York 1994" to the list of studies of the affects of
adult businesses.
2. Revise Section 1 .C.(3) to read as follows:
"(3) The studies conducted in various communities in other
jurisdictions have demonstrated that the proximity and concentration of adult-oriented
businesses adjacent to residential, recreational, religious, educational, or other
adult-oriented businesses can cause other businesses and residents to move elsewhere
if the adult-oriented businesses are not propedy regulated to prevent or reduce these
secondary land use effects. It is the intent of the regulations set forth in this Ordinance
to reduce these secondary land use affects of adult businesses."
Revise Section 1 .C.(10) to read as follows:
"(10) The secondary land use effects of adult-oriented or sexually-
oriented businesses described above can also be reduced if the businesses are located
in shopping centers which will provide for maintenance, parking, security, and other
operational matters so as to enhance the compatibility of adult-oriented or sexually-
odented business with neighboring businesses and sensitive land uses."
4. Modify the ordinance certification to read as follows:
"Section ~ The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof
to be published and posted in the manner required by law.
of
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
,1998.
day
RONALD ROBERTS
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its
first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of
,1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and
passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of ,
1998 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ITEM
17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCe'
CITY MANAGER .,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
August 25, 1998
Murrieta Creek Project Committee Membership
RECOMMENDATION: That one member of the City Council be appointed to serve on the
Murrieta Creek Project Committee.
BACKGROUND: Supervisor Bob Buster has proposed forming a committee of local representatives
to meet with himself, Riverside County Flood Control District Staff and the Army Corp of Engineers
to discuss issues relating to the Murrieta Creek.
The Army Corp of Engineers has recently begun their feasibility study on this Muraleta project.
Supervisor Buster is proposing a committee comprised of five members including a Councilmember
from Temecula and Murrieta, and two members of the public, and himself.
In addition to following the Corps progress, the committee would also coordinate local efforts, build
support and identify the additional funding sources necessary to build the project.
The first meeting is proposed for mid September and Supervisor Buster would appreciate the name
of our designee by the end of August or sooner.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Letter from Supervisor Buster
Rc~YATESG~EPORTS%STAFF~rnu rfieta creek committee.doe
RIVERSIDE OFFICE:
4080 Lemon Street, 14th Floor
P.O. Box 1527
Riverside, CA 92502-1527
(909) 955-1010
Fax (909) 955-1019
David P. Stahovich
July 28, 1998
SUPERVISOR Boa BUSTER
FIRST DISTRICT
TEMECULMMURRIETA OFF1CE:
41002 County Center Drive, Suite 205
Temecula, CA 92591
~909) 694-5150
Fax (909) 694-5190
Jane Bouchard
Wendy Kolk
Mayor Ron Roberts
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mayor Roberts:/~~ )
Council
R. Bradley
J. Kicak
As you know, the progress of the Murrieta Creek project, which promises permanent
flood protection through central portions of your city, has entered a critical stage as the
Corps of Engineers commences their feasibility study. Depending on the Corps'
extensive analysis, more than half the project's costs could be federally funded. The
Corps' study offers the best chance to bring local costs down to reasonable levels while
maintaining the Creek project consensus design to benefit property owners, the
community and the Santa Margarita Watershed.
This project is a priority for my district and for the County Flood Control District, the
lead agency. I want to follow it closely and help in every way possible.
To better track and assist the Corps' work to a speedy and favorable result, I propose
forming a committee of local representatives who would join with me and District staff to
meet with Corps project staff on a regular basis. I suggest a membership of five, with
myself, a council member from Temecula and Murrieta and two public members. In
addition to following the Corps progress, the committee should also coordinate our local
efforts, building support and identifying the additional funding sources necessary to build
the project.
The Corps has agreed to meet with us on a regular basis, at least quarterly. I propose that
the first meeting be set in mid September. I would appreciate, therefore, your council
INTERNET: district l~co.riverside.ca.us
notifying me of your designee by the end of August or sooner if your meeting schedule
allows.
Thank you for your support and cooperation with this important project.
Sincerely,
Bob Buster
Supervisor, 1~t District
BB;jb
CCi
Jim Venable, Supervisor, 3rd Dist.
Dave Zappe, Chief Engineer, RCFCWCD
James Adams, U.S. Corps of Engineers
Jeannie Gillen, Chair, Murrieta Creek Committee
ITEM
18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 25, 1998
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FOR (ITEM 18)
Award of Construction Contract for Margarita Road Storm Drain, Project
No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award construction contract for the Margarita Road Storm Drain, Project No. PW97-07
to Hemet Manufacturing Co., Inc. d.b.a. Genesis Construction, in the amount of
$330,777.00.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount, which is 10% of the contract amount or $33,077.70.
BACKGROUND: The bids for the installation of the pipe, storm drain project on
Margarita (No. PW97-07) were received Thursday, August 20, 1998 at 4:00 P.M. Total of six
bids was received. These were as follows:
1. Hemet Manufacturing, Inc. d.b.a. Genesis Construction
2. Bonadiman-McCain, Inc.
3. GODOT Enterprises, Inc.
4. Vasilj Inc. d.b.a. IVANKO
5. M. Ahmadi Construction & Engineering
6. Albert W. Davies, Inc.
330,777.00
421,140.50
425,635.00
479,478.50
657,950.00
896,218.94
As previously stated the engineer's estimate for construction is
$425,000.00. The delivery of pipe will be timely with respect to award, and delivery of all the
contract documents for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the approved CIP Budget, Account No.
210-165-681-5804.
~,TENIEC_F$2011DATA~DEPTS~¥~AGDRPT~8~0826~W87.O 7 SUPPLEM ENTAL.DOC/jk
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO.'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
JAoseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
ugust 25, 1998
Award of Construction Contract for Margarita Road Storm Drain, Project
No. PW97-07
PREPARED BY:
William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - CIP
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award construction contract for the Margarita Road Storm Drain, Project No. PW97-07
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount which is 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: 1998-1999 CIP Budget as approved by the City Council provides
funds for improvements of the perimeter streets of the Mall Site. Included in the Overland Drive
and Margarita Road Street Improvement portion of that project are funds for the associated
storm drain improvements. To expedite the project, City Council authorized the staff to
proceed with these storm drain improvements and purchase the materials (pipe) for the project
and award the labor portion as a separate contract. The materials (pipe) have been ordered and
should be delivered in early September. This will be timely with respect to this contract for
labor.
The project consists of installation of 2,000 lineal feet of storm drain in Margarita Road
southerly of Winchester Road and discharging it into Long Canyon Creek northerly of future
Overland Drive intersection with Margarita Road.
Due to the location of the proposed storm drain in the paved section of Margarita Road,
temporary pavement widening in Margarita Road will be required to minimize the disruption of
traffic. This widened roadway will remain in place until the reconstruction and ultimate
widening of Margarita Road occurs, later this year.
~TEMEC_FS201 \DATAtD EPTS\PW~GD RPT\98\0825\PW97.07.DOClleh
The bids will be open on August 20, 1998 and the results along with recommendation to award
the contract will be provided to the City Council prior to the City Council meeting of August
25, 1998.
Specifications provide for 30 working days to complete the project. We expect the work to be
completed by late October.
Engineer's cost estimate for construction is $450,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through
Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Street Improvements, Public
Services, and Public Facilities. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165-
681-5804.
ATTACHMENTS: Contract
\\TEM EC_FS20 I\DATA\D EPTS'J:NV~AGDRPT\98\08215\PVV97-07 .DOC/~eh
of
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-07
MARGARITA ROAD STORM DRAIN
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 25th day of August, 1998, by and between the City
Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
· hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1 a
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA
ROAD STORM DRAIN, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD STORM DRAIN. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD STORM
DRAIN.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that
only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CII~PROJECTS\I=~N97\PW97-O7\CONTRACT1 ,DOC
2
3
4
5
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide
and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-07 MARGARITA ROAD STORM DRAIN
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of:
and DOLLARS and CENTS ($ ), the total
amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed THIRTY (30) working days,
commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until
bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6 PAYMENTS.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part
thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and
the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the
CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107
is hereby incorporated by reference.
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIF~PROJECTS\PW97\P~N97-O7\CONTRACT1 .DOC
7
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, a reduction in the retention
may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress
of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000- $75,000
$75,000- $500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
8
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant
to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not
be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the
fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
10 PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State
of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as
a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker,
or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIF~PRO JECTS\PW97\PW97-O7\CONTRACT1 .DOC
11.TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in
preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship,
and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any
architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project.
CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the
CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract,
CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and
persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project
have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for
either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering
disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the
provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual
or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
1 7. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may
be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to
inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CI~PROJECTS\IWV97\F~/97-O7\CONTRACT1. DOC
20. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of
California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this
Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties
concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled
to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
21 .ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as
amended.
22.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents
shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the
address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY
addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
Phone:
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\CIP~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O7\CONTRACT1 .DOC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CIP~PROJE CTS\PW97\P~N97-O7\CONTRACT1. DOC
ITEM
19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance'~$~"v
August 25, 1998
Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Funding Request
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider a $18,000 funding request from the
Temecula Valley Playhouse for their community service programs.
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Valley Playhouse is a not-for-profit organization established
in 1983. Since that time the Playhouse has provided a high quality community theater by using
numerous volunteers and community donations. This organization provides important, valuable
services to all age groups in our community.
Educational Services: Since 1990 the Playhouse has provided community service hours
to local high school students assisting them in fulfilling their graduation requirements.
Individual Improvement: Both young and old individuals improve themselves by
participating in Playhouse productions while learning important academic and social skills
such as: teamwork, communication, accountability, public speaking, respect, commitment
and patience. These skills lead to improved self-esteem and confidence which in turn helps
improve the quality of the community as individual citizens grow in a positive, proactive
environment.
Cultural Amenity: The Playhouse is a community theater in the Temecula Valley area that
is for all ages, regardless of sex, race, or religion. The Playhouse provides a community
service that offers inexpensive fun, live entertainment, presented by family members, friends
and neighbors of residents of the City of Temecula.
In the future, the Temecula Valley Playhouse plans to:
become self sufficient;
implement a marketing program to reach surrounding communities;
introduce scholarship funds for the Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore school districts;
obtain corporate sponsors and members to improve the shod-term revenue and volunteer
suppod base.
R.'WOR TONL ~AGENDAS~C SF PLAYHOUSE AGENDA DOC 08/04/97
The City of Temecula has supported the Playhouse annually through the City's Community Service
Funding Program.
In prior years, the Playhouse has used its funding for the replacement of sound equipment,
replacement of seating, cleaning the air ducts and heating system, repair of lighting equipment, and
operating expenses of the facility. The Playhouse is requesting $18,000 for FY 1998-99 for the
purpose of assisting the organization with its annual operating costs associated with theater
productions. The Playhouse's operating expenses for the 1998-99 season total $55,990, with ticket
sales anticipated to cover only $38,880 of these costs.
The Playhouse utilizes more than 200 volunteers. The 1997-98 season was very successful.
Community support was strong, as evidenced by ticket sales, new memberships, community
sponsorships, and increased numbers of volunteers supporting the organization.
FISCAL IMPACT: $15,000 is included in the FY 1998-99 Community Support budget to fund this
request. An additional appropriation of $3,000 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance will
be required to fund this request.
Attachment: Application
R.'WOR T ONDAG ENDAS~CSF PLAYHOUSE AGENDA DOC 08/04/97
CITY OF TEMECULA
1998-99
COMMUNITY SERVICES FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION
(Please Print or Type)
1998-99 Program Submission Deadline: Friday, September 25, 1998 (7 copies required)
Amount Requested: $ x/~ ~
Name of Project: TE]~CULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
Project Start Date: JULY 1982
ORGANIZATION'S DATA:
Name of Organization:
Contact Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Number of Paid Staff:
PO BOX 74
909-676-0775
-0-
Geographic Area(s) Served:
Project End Date: CONTINUAl
TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
JULIE PITRUZZELLO
TEMECULA, CA 92592
Year Founded: 1982
Number of Volunteers:
TEMECULA VALLEY & SURROUNDING AREAS
(Maximum allowable $5,000)
150 - 20O
Is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization?
Yes X No
If "yes":
Date of incorporation as a non-profit
Federal identification number
State identification number
Effective Date: 06/10/R,3
06/10/83
33-0008806
1144O97
*Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California.
If "no":
Name of sponsoring organization
Federal identification number
State identification number
This application has been authorized by the organization's:
Executive Committee x
Members-at-large
Board of Directors X
R:WORTONLICSF~$E99,APP. FRM 05/13/$8
AUG.-OS'98[MONJ 09:56 GALLERIA AT TYLER TEL:909 3513139 P, 002
City of Temecula
Community Service Funding Program
Application
Financial Statements (Based on your orglnazatlon's last fiscal year)
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1998
Asset
Cash and Investments 2,193
Fixed Assets 64,276
Liabilities & Investments
Current Payables
Notes Payable
Fund Balance
0
15,950
50,519
Total Assets 66,469
Total Liabilities &
Fund Balance
66,489
Income Statement for Year Ended 1998
Income
Fundraising 8,701
Government Funds 15,o00
Other Sources ° 32,306
Expense
Salades
Operating Expense *°
Community Service
0
50,463
14,121
*Ticket Sales and Donations
°' Rent and Utilities
AUG.-O3'98(MONI 09:57 GALLERIA AT TYLER TEL:909 3513139 P. 004
Temecula Valley Playhouse
Cash Flow Report
June 30. 1998
Income
Ad Income
City Grant
Corporate Sponsor
Other Income
Seat Sponsor
Ticket Sales
Total Income
Expense
Ads
Depreciation
Insurance
Utilities
Concessions
Dues
Fundraisers
Misc.
Postage
Production
Rent
Repairs
Scripts
Sound
Supplies
Telephone
Theater Exp
Theatre R&M
Total Expense
Net Income
25
15,000
225
196
8,280
32,281
56,007
835
8,768
1,615
1,862
85
70
990
1,450
121
11,515
25,539
420
88
487
1,291
1,039
8,253
155
64,584
(8,578)
THE ORGANIZATION MISSION
STATEMENT
Application Page 3
~ describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it
provides. Include discussion on the specific ways your organization meets the City's criteria listed on
page 2.
*Please see attached "Mission Statement", exhibit 'A'
TVP HAS CONTINUED TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY COMMUNITY THEATRE YEAR AFTER YEAR,
ESPECIALLY AS THE COMMUNITY GROWS AND ADDITIONAL VOLUNTEERS ARE ADDED TO OUR PRD(iRAM.
R: [NOR TONLiC$~9899,4 PP. FRM
IFE TVP BOARD OF DIRECTORS CURRENTLY HAS 9 EXECUTIVE FEIVBEILS AJ!) HAS RECENTLY ADDFI1 4 CHAIRMANSHIP
POSITIONS WITH I~IVIDUALS WHO ARE EXPERIENCED IN ~, ACCOUNTING, HUMAN RESOURCES, MARKETING,
A~D NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEt4ENT. TFE BOARD CONTINUES TO IIi~JEIqENT EFFECTIVE SY~ ~
AL'TIVITIES TO INCREASE TFE QUALITY OF OUR CRGANIZATION. ll/P ENJOYS A 'f4EIVBERSHIP" OF OVER 230 VOLUNTEERS.
TVP'S '97 - '98 SEASON WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL WITH TFE ORGANIZATION EXPERIENCING RECORD NLIVBERS OF
COII4JNITY SUPPORT. THIS SUPPORT WAS EVIDEItT IN TICKET SALES, AS WELL AS NEW ~fiE~BEELSHIP, COMMUNITY
SPONSORSHIPS, INCREASED NLH~ER OF VOLUNTEERS IN EVERY ASPECT OF THEATRE A~D PRODUCTION.
REGARDING FISCAL MANAGEI~ENT, TVP HAS HAD SUFFICIENT FISCAL MANAGEh!EIqT: HOWEVER, THE BOARD IS PLEASED
TO HAVE ADDED TO THE TEaM A RETIRED CPA WITH F_XIE]qSIVE EXPERIENCE ON TFE BOARDS OF OTHER NON-PROFIT
ARTS ORGN~IZATIONS (SPECIFICALLY, ~ LA JOLLA CO~Y ARTS MUSEUM A~D SAN DIEGO'S OLD GLOBE THEATRE)
TVP PROVIDES NLIVBEROUS SERVICES TO TFE COMV!UNITY. SINCE 1990, TVP HAS P~VIDED ~ OPPORTUNITY FOR
SllJDENTS TO FULFILL GOFt4JNITY SERVICE REQUIRE]VEIqTS, HAS PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY FOR I~IVIDUALS OF
ALL AGES TO IMPROVE TFEMSELVES BY PARTICIPATING IN PRODUCTIONS ~ TAKING AN ACTIVE ROLE IN INTF11 ECTUAL
A~D SOCIAL SKILLS, All) HAS PROVIDED ~ COlI4UNIIY WITH AN INEXPENSIVE EVENING OF FUN AbD LIVE ENTER-
TAINVENT PRESENTED COLLECTIVELY BY OUR FAMILY hiEIvE)EI~S, FRIENDS, AJl) NEIGFBORS.
TVP IS TFE ONLY COMiJNITY TFEATRE IN ~ VALLEY THAT IS FOR ALL ACES, REGARDLESS OF SEX, RACE, OR
RELIGION AI~D )~qICH SUPPORTS TFE C. ZIVH]NITIES OF FENIFEE, SUN CITY, MURRIEFA, ELSINORE, WI~,A~D
EXPERIENCED PARTICIPATION FROM RIVERSIDE, CORONA, A~D MDRENO VALLEY ~ FALLBROOK.
AS A FEIVBER OF TFE INLA~D EIVPIRE THEATRE LEAGUE, OUR COIVMUNITY THEATRE HAS RECEIVED NOTED RECOGNITION
VIA NUFEROUS NOMINATIONS All) AWARDS FOR OUR PEREOF~ERS/~lkD PR(~(]UCTIONS. 1HESE AWARDS HAVE ELEVATED
TEIvECULA'S PRESTIGE AMDNG O]vHJNITIES ~ICH SUPPORT TFE ARTS.
O5/~ 3/95
EXHIBIT A
Mission Statement
Temecula Valley Playhouse
The Temecula Valley Playhouse is the place to be, not just a place to visit.
The TVP is dedicated to the community as a non-profit, non-denominational
cultural amenity by helping the individual, young and old, develop the mind, the
body and the spirit. We will, through hard work and a common commitment to
excellence, join these individuals together to create, motivate, educate and inspire
beyond what any individual believes possible of themselves.
The Temecula Valley Playhouse has continued to provide high quality
community theater year after year even as the community continues to expand
and additional volunteers are added to the program.
TVP has added several people to the board of Directors who specialize in
Management, Marketing, Advertising and Accounting with a passion for
theater. The accounting methods within the Playhouse have been upgraded
allowing our board to have a more active role in controlling costs. Concurrently,
the Marketing, Advertising and Promotional efforts have been "stepped up" to
create and implement effective strategies and activities vital to the growth of the
Playhouse.
3. TVP was granted a non-profit status on July 10, 1983.
4. TVP does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality, sex, marital
status, disability, religion or political aff'diation.
5. TVP does not require anyone to participate in any political, religious or social
activity.
6. The number of volunteers and the continued support by the Citizens and
Merchants indicate a high level of support for the Playhouse.
7. & 8. Attached Financial Statement for 1996-1997 and the budget for 1997-1998.
TVP through the use of public access or cable TV, radio, newspapers, mailers
and flyers, encourage everyone to attend each run of a show, subject to seating
capacity of 160 per show.
10. The TVP Board of Directors, which is very involved with each show, evaluates
every show on what was done right and what could be improved. Evidence of this
can be seen by the quality of talented performers the Playhouse continues to attract.
PROJECT REQUESTING
FUNDING
Application Page 4
How will your organization use any funding awarded? Provide project objectives, persons served, area
serviced, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Include equipment or services that would
be purchased and why. Include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this
project. You may attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information. (Please
type or print legibly.)
TVP has experienced wonderfully increased conmnity support during the past season. Ticket sales,
attendance, and financial sponsorships have enjoyed an all-time high. TVP has acccmplished
substantial renovation: the theatre now has real theatre seating, curtained walls, and a concession/
ticket sales booth. l~ese acccmplist~ have been attained by the support of the Comu~ity Services
Funding, the support of financial donors, and the support of volunteers and ticket sales.
TVP requests funding to off-set expenses projected for the coming season, as described below:
in~urancP 1,740
uti 11ties 2,160
phone 540
printing 4,500
postaqe 1,450
production costs 13,000
~f~r~or~i~ ~,2Uu
~ lighting
re-patinting of lobby 500
TVHS scholarship 500
stipends 1,000
-- this figure includes rents, royalties, set construction costs
for the six shows slated to be presented for the '98-'99 season
-- this is for a re-condz~toned
$55,990 PROJECTED A~ilAL EXPENSES.
$38,880 PROJECTED A~ TICKET SALES
$17,110 PROJECTED A~ DEFICIT FOR WHICH WE ARE REQUESTING FUII)ING
TVP anticipates increased support of volunteers and sponsorships for the coming year.
The continued interest and support frcm the City Council is greatly appreciated. TVP is
proud to offer the cownunity quality performances, as well as an opportunity to be involved
in a viable and productive organization.
R: INOR TO NL I CSF~ 9$$9,APP. FRM 05/I 3/98
SIGNATURE PAGE
Application Page 5
We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and
belief.
Preparer:
AND . .....
President or
JIJLIE A. PITRUZZR I 0, BOARD DIRECTOR OF TI~ECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type)
·
PA~I DRB4, VICE PRESIDENT OF TE~CULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
Authorized Officer:
"~' ~'~~~ ' (Signature)
BUTTERFIELD STAGE PLAYERS DBA: TBv~CULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
(Organization Name)
P0 BOX 74 TE~0JLA, CA 92592
(Mailing Address of Organization)
909-676-0775
(Telephone)
JULY 31, 1998
(Date)
BE SURE TO INCLUDF TH!= ORIGINAL PLUS 6 COPIFS (TOTAL OF 7 COPIES) AND SUBMIT TO:
Mail Completed Application to:
City of Temecula
Community Services Funding Program
Linda Norton
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Or Deliver in Person to:
City of Temecula
Linda Norton
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R: INOR TONI I CSF~$8$9,APP. FRM 05/I 3/98
Il
ITEM
20
CITY
DIR.
CITY
APPROVAL
ATTORNEY
OF FINANCE
MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance"/"'";~"~'
DATE: August 25, 1998
SUBJECT: Arts Council of Temecula Valley Community Service Funding Request
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and consider the Arts Council of
Temecula Valley funding request in the amount of $22,000 for their community service programs.
DISCUSSION: The Arts Council of Temecula Valley is a not-for-profit organization established
in 1989 for the purpose of promoting:
1. Growth of visual and performing arts in the community,
2. Individual arts and arts organizations,
3. Networking for coordination and sharing of resources,
4. Construction of facilities for the performing arts, and
5. Publicity of arts and cultural activities in Temecula Valley.
This organization is comprised of more than 300 volunteers who are dedicated to providing quality
arts programs in the Temecula Valley. The Arts Council meets at least twice yearly with
representatives from 26 arts organizations in the Temecula Valley to determine how they can provide
better service to those organizations. The Arts Council meets with an outside group of representative
citizens in Temecula to conduct strategic planning sessions and to track progress in meeting
previously established goals.
In prior years, the Arts Council has used City funds primarily for the Concert on the Green and the
Arts Festival of Temecula Valley. In 1998 an additional $10,000 was given to the Arts Council to
provide grants to other arts organizations in the community.
The Arts Council has submitted a 1998-99 funding request for $22,000 for the programs, which are
detailed in the attached application and are outlined below:
1. Concert on the Green - $12,000
2. Temecula Valley Arts Festival - $10,000
FISCAL IMPACT: $22,000 has been appropriated in the 1998-99 Community Support budget
for the Arts Council funding.
Attachment: Application
R:WORTONL~GENDAStCSF ARTS COUNCIL AGENDADOC 08/4/97
OF Tltlg TEMECULA VALLEY
POST OFFICE BOX 2337 [] TEMECULA, CA 92593
13 909.695.2787
RECEIVED
JUL
FINANCE DEPT.
[] FAX 909.695.9438 [] email: temarts~pe. net
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
~ob AnSerson July 10, 1998
Albert and Grace Ball
John and Theresa Bell
Eve Craig
Maryann and Tom Edwards
Jo Anne Flowers
Randy and Diane Holland
Carol Jones
Ms. Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, California 92590
Richard mad Barbara Keen
Jon and Jill Lieberg
FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE ARTS COUNCIL
Jame~ and Dorothy Meyler
Helen and Paul Miller
Jo Moulton
Angela Morris-Myers
Jerry and Pat Novotney
Doris and C.J. Royer
Bruce Singer
Janet Tosches
Alan Wlnkelstetn
Dear Genie,
Thank you very much for your inclusion of The Arts Council of the Temecula
Valley in the City of Temeeula budget. We appreciate greatly the partnership we
share with the City.
Enclosed please find the Budget Funding Request package required to release the
$22,000.00 to the Arts Council. With the Concert on the Green approaching
rapidly, and the Arts Festival successfully concluded, we would be very grateful
for the release of the funds at your earliest convenience.
If you need any additional information, please feel flee to call me at
909.695.2787. Thank you again for your support.
BOARD CONSULTANTS
Bob and Jo Blro Very truly yours,
Zev and VIirim Bumnan ~~
Karen Parrott
Martha N. Minklet
Executive Director
EXECUTIV~ DmEc'roa
Martiaa N. Minider
Tom Edwards, President of the Board of Trustees
Jim Meyler, Treasurer
BUDGET FUNDING REQUEST
TO
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THE ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY
respectfully requests funding from the City of Temecula, in the amount of:
$22,000
for the City's fiscal year commencing July 1, 1998, in order to provide services to the
City, as outlined below.
Our budget request for $22,000 is for the following purposes:
· Concert on the Green - $12,000
· Temecula Valley Arts Festival - $10,000
Further details of this request are provided in the format requested by the City on the
attached pages. Thank you for your consideration.
CITY OF TEMECULA
1998-99
BUDGET FUNDING REQUEST
Page 2
Amount Requested: $22,000
Project Name: Please see cover sheet
Project Starting Date: July 1, 1998
Project Ending Date: June 30, 1999
ORGANIZATION'S BACKGROUND:
Name of Organization: The Arts Council of Temecula Valley
Mailing address: P.O. Box 2337, Temecula, CA 92593
Physical office address: 28481 Rancho California Road, Suite 104, Temecula, CA 92590
Telephone: (909) 695-ARTS Year Founded: 1989
Number of paid staff: one Number of Volunteers: several hundred
Geographic area(s) served: City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley
Is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization?
Yes
If "yes":
If "no":
Date of incorporation as a non-profit: August 1, 1989
Federal identification number: 33-0364524
State identification number: 2465903
*Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California
Name of sponsoring organization: Not applicable
Federal identification number: Not applicable
State identification number: Not applicable
This application has been authorized by the organization's:
Executive Committee: Yes Board of Directors: Yes
Members at large: Not applicable
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Based on your organization's last fiscal year)
Balance sheet as of December 31, 1997
Assets
Cash and Investments $49,813.78
Receivables (detail) none
Inventory none
Fixed Assets 3,208.49
Other Assets none
Total Assets $53,022.27
Liabilities and Investments
Current payables none
Notes Payable none
Fund Balance $53,022.27
Total Liability &
Fund Balance
$53,022.27
Income Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 1997
Income
Fundraiser receipts
Public Support/Contributions
City of Temecula Grant
Admissions/Ticket Sales
Other income
Total income
Expenses
$10,420.00 Fundraiser expenses $ 5,223.78
$19,482.00 Operating Expenses $13,692.33
$22,000.00 Community Service $39,601.11
$ 5,487.00 Salaries none
$ 2,337.95 Other expenses none
$59,766.95 Total expenses $58,517.22
Page 2.1
Please note with an asterisk (*) any amounts that require additional explanation, and comment on these
items.
None required
In addition, please attach the organization's most recent treasurer's report, financial statements and
footnotes.
Reports enclosed
Your Organization's Mission: Page 3
Bdefiy describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it
provides. Include discussion regarding the specific ways your organization meets the City's cdteria listed
on page 2.
Purposes of the Arts Council are to:
· Stimulate the growth of visual and performing arts in the community
· Promote and facilitate arts education
· Assist individual artists and arts organizations
· Create a network for coordination and sharing of resources
· To encourage construction of facilities for the performing arts
· To publicize arts and cultural activities in the Temecula Valley
Criteria:
Does the organization provide Community service excellence?
More than 10,000 people attended activities sponsored by the Arts Council in 1997. Nearly
$20,000 was received in voluntary donations from individuals and organizations.
What is the size and makeup of the community service organization?
There are 19 members on the Board of Trustees and hundreds of volunteers who
contribute to the activities. The Arts Council of Temecula Valley is a volunteer
organization with a paid part-time Executive Director.
Co
What is the public and cdtic reaction to the group?
Please see "a", above. The 1998 Arts Festival produced over 1200 column inches of news
print. Comments have ranged from favorable to outstanding. We are unaware of any
negative press.
do
Does the organization have a high quality of fiscal management?
Budgeting and accounting has been performed, since inception, by members of a CPA
staff, although the format has not been presented with reports per AICPA criteria. The
financial figures, presented on page 2 of this request, provide evidence of the quality of
fiscal management.
Will the organization have longevity in the City of Temecula?
The Arts Council of Temecula Valley was incorporated in 1989, before the City was formed.
We have been designated by the City Council as the lead arts organization for the City.
Does the organization have proper authorized non-profit status?
The Arts Council of Temecula Valley has been designated a 501(c)(3) Charitable non-profit
organization by the IRS and a 23701d tax-exempt organization by the State of California.
Is there evidence of satisfactory service provided to City's citizens?
See items a, and c. above.
Is the organization free from discrimination based on race, color, creed, nationality, sex, marital
status, disability, religion or political affiliation?
Yes
Does the organization require attendance or participation in any political, religious or social
activity?
No
Page 3.1
Can the organization provide financial statements (prepared using an appropriate method of
accoun. ting) to demonstrate sound financial management?
Yes. Statements have been provided to the City for past years. A statement is enclosed
for the period from January 1 to December 31, 1997.
ko
Can the organization provide a budget for the fiscal year of request, demonstrating cost
effectiveness?
Yes. Our budget is enclosed for the calendar year ending December 31, 1998
Does the organization provide a high level of access to the services offered?
Yes. Approximately 12,000 persons will attend Arts Council events this year.
Does the organization possess ongoing program evaluation tools?
Yes.
Projects Requesting Funding Page 4
How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the projects objectives, number of persons
served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any
equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Include a detailed
budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this project. Attach a maximum of one double
spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space.
Concert on the Green - $12,000
Ever since its inception, the Concert on the Green has been the most popular cultural activity held in
Temecula. For the past four years, attendance has exceeded 2000 persons. Our contract with the
Riverside Philharmonic will be approximately $11,800. Additional costs will cover tent and sanitation
rentals, sound and advertising. This year the activity will be moved to the Temecula Sports Park, which
will incur additional advertising expense. We have no income from this event.
~ ~ ~ ~ - Temecula Valley Arts Festival - $10,000
The Temecula Valley Arts Festival will soon become one of the more respected cultural activities in
Southern California. This is no longer just a production of the Arts Council, but rather, it is produced by
many different organizations in the Temecula Valley. ~ ~ ~ ~ '~o~ included eleven separate
events produced by several organizations that are receiving support from the Arts Council. These
included Fine Arts Network, Temecula Vintage Singers, Joya Dance Ensemble, Temecula Valley High
School Choir, Chaparral High School Choir, Temecula Valley Art League, Temecula Ballet, Temecula
Valley Film Council and the Christian Youth Theater.
We averaged almost 500 persons attending each event. We received corporate and pdvate
sponsorships totaling $10,000 for this Arts Festival. The net cost of this event to the Arts Council, before
City sponsorship, is approximately $10,000.
Project(s) Requesting Funding
Page 5
We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and
belief.
Preparer:
Martha Minkler, Executive Director
(Signature)
AND
President or
Authorized Officer: . , _T.l~mas Ed s.,aml"~""'~~tnt
...~ (Signature)
Arts Council of Temecula Valley
P.O. Box 2337
Temecula, CA 92593
Telephone - (909) 695-ARTS
FAX - (909) 695-9438
Email - temarts(~.pe.net
June 24, 1998
88.
$8
8R88~ ~ ~.as. ~. 88 8 8 8 ~8 ~ 8 8
88
8N88~
~R8 88 8 [8 8
8
_1
888 8
8888888888888888888888888888 8
888 8
8888888888888888888888888888 8
888
8888888888888888888888888888
......... ~ .... ~..~..~..~..~
§
8
8888 8
8888
8888
ITEM
21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
July 28, 1998
Temecula Library Services
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst~(.~-
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council discuss a possible agreement with the City of
Murrieta and County of Riverside regarding the Temecula Library.
BACKGROUND: As of July 1, 1998, the City of Murrieta is no longer part of the Riverside
County Library System, opting to open its own library in Murrieta. In order to facilitate Murrieta's
ability to provide library services to its residents, the Mayor of Murrieta has been working with the
Riverside County First District Supervisor to recover approximately $240,000 in library mitigation
funds. These funds were generated within the region of the Temecula Library, and, to date, have
not been designated for use.
In return for Murrieta's receipt of the library mitigation funds, the County of Riverside and City of
Murdeta would waive all current and future claims against the existing library, its collection, and
materials (see attached letter from Mayor Jack F. van Haaster, City of Murrieta).
FISCAL IMPACT: In return for the City of Murdeta's receipt of the library mitigation funds, the City
of Temecula would be entitled to the existing library, collection, materials, and all future additions
to the library or its resources if and when the City of Temecula opts to withdraw from the Riverside
County Library System.
Attachment: Letter from Mayor, City of Murrieta
2 I P.EI2
CITY OF MURRIET
26442 Bcckman Court, MmTieta, CA 92562
Telephone: 909-698-1040 Fax: 909-698-4509
A
Office of the Mayor
August 18, 1998
Mayor Ron Roberts
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park-D~ve
Temecula, California 92590
Subject: Murrieta Library Mit'~gation.' '
Dear Mayor Roberts:
Last month I met with Supervisor Buster to discuss resolution of Uurrieta's library mitigation credit as a r(~s~it
of the establishment el: the City's library. The amounts in question are (1) an excess of $450,000 paid in
direct mitigation fees by Murdeta residents; and (2) thousands of additional dollars contributed over the past
sevea years for the facility's collection and materials.
Supervisor Buster and his staff infon'ned me of a County library mitigation fund of approximately $240,000.
The Supervisor stated that these funds were not designated to any particular purpose or entity. The County
discussed the possibility of releasing these funds to Murrieta in lieu of all other claims to the County and the
library by the City of Murrieta for its full library mitigation.
When you and I discussed this matter recently, I explained that the County's proposal would most likely be
agreeable to the City of Murrieta. The County has indicated that this resolution to Murrieta's library
mitigation funds would be acceptable if the City of Temecula was in agreement.
As such, if the City of Temecula were to agree to the release of the County's library mitigation funds to
Murrieta, Murrieta would act on waiving all of its current and future claims against the existing library, its
collection, and materials. This action would result in Temecula having full control of the existing library and
collection when eventually dealing with the County to resolve its mitigation credits.
Please call me as soon as you'and your City CounCil have had an opportunity to review and possibly act
upon tllis matter. "
City Council
City Manager
ITEM
22
DISCUSSION ITEM ONLY
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director'~;~
DATE:
August 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Prepared by:
RECOMMENDATION:
Monthly Report
Valerie Wimberly, Administrative Secr~.~
Receive and File
Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning
Division caseload and project activity for the month of July 1998:
Caseload Activity:
The Department received 37 applications for administrative cases and 9 applications for public
hearing cases for the month of July.
The following are the public hearing cases:
Minor Conditional Use PM
Development Plan -with CEQA
Development Plan - subject to CEQA
Tentative Plan with CEQA
General Plan Amendment with Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit
Change of Zone
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Total
9
Attachments:
List of Activities with Detail - page 3
Revenue Status Report - page 4
i~:'~vIONTI-]I,Y.P-~F~1998UUL Y, WPD 8/18/98 v~' 1
On~oin~ Projects:
Regional Mall: Phase II grading has commenced. Building construction is expected to
commence in early fall of 1998, with the opening scheduled for October 1999.
Murclv Ranch Specific Plan: New owner has been conferring with staff, the school district and
TCSD in preparation for plan submittal.
Roripauc~h Ranch Specific Plan: The draft Specific Plan was submitted July 17, 1998. It is
anticipated that the EIR will be submitted in the not too distant future.
Southside Specific Plan: Staff and consultant are finalizing the draft Specific Plan.
Massage Business Ordinance: This item will be scheduled for City Council meeting after staff
receives City Attorney comments.
Adult Business Ordinance: This item is scheduled for the August 25, 1998 City Council
meeting.
General Plan Circulation Element Update (and revision to citywide traffic study): The
consultant has commenced work. The fifth Steedng Committee meeting will be held on
September 14, 1998. The project is on schedule.
Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is in the process of developing an appropriate subdivision
ordinance for the City. The City currently uses Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 to
regulate the subdivision of land.
Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation Study: Staff is proceeding with the annexation of the
Redhawk/Vail Ranch area. Staff submitted the application to LAFCO on August 8th. It is
anticipated that the item will go before LAFCO in October 1998 and the election for rates and
charges will be held in March 1999.
Surface Minin.~ Ordinance: Staff is currently developing a Surface Mining Ordinance to
ensure that sites are excavated in a safe and reasonable manner with progressive
reclamation to a natural appearing or otherwise useable condition compatible with adjacent
areas.
I~:'~vfO~VTHLY.R.PT~ 1998UULY.WPD 8/I 8/05 vgw 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LIST OF ACTIVITY BY CASE NUMBER
R:~v~ONTt-K,Y.RPT~I998UULY.WPD 8/18/98 vgw ~
0
0
o,
O0
0
0
[.,....
0
0
0
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:~vlONTI-ILY.P.P'l'~1998UULY.V~PD 8/18/98vsw 4
REVPRIN2
08/18/98
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4135
4136
4139
4140
4170
4171
4190
4195
4200
4206
4369
4370
07:40:21
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
AMENDED FINAL NAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIME
SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS
MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS
PARCEL MAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
MINOR CHANGE
PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
SECOND UNIT PERMITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERMIT
REVISED PERMIT
SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES)
CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PARCEL MAP/WA]VER
MERGER
CONDO TRACT MAP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
K-Pa~T STUDY FEES
HOME OCCUPATIONS
DEVLPNNT PLAN-ADMINISTRATIVE
DIF REDUCTION APPLICATION
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATION FEES
LAND DIV UNIT MAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JULY 1998
ADJUSTED
ESTIMATE
.00
550.00
1,980.00
5,700.00
22,100.00
6,380.00
24,070.00
9,540.00
570.00
2,280.00
420.00
3,500.00
.00
3,460.00
43,180.00
12,840.OO
4,450.00
162,900.00
.00
.00
300.00
12,310.00
.00
.00
2,990.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
10,760.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
3,520.00
5,850.00
.00
.00
.00
350.00
.00
JULY
REVENUE
.00
.00
200.00
.00
24,598.80
.00
625.00
690.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
4,309.00
.00
4,128.00
11,300.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
740.00
382.00
.00
.00
18.00
2,424.65
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
;6o
1,270.00
.00
187.00
4,925.00
1998-99
REVENUE
PAGE 1
BALANCE % COL
.00 .00
.00 550.00 0.0
200.00 1,780.00 10.1
.00 5,700.00 0.0
24,598.80 2,498.80- 111.3
.00 6,380.00 0.0
625.00 23,445.00 2.6
690.00 8,850.00 7.2
.00 570.00 0.0
.00 2,280.00 0.0
.00 420.00 0.0
.00 3,500.00 0.0
.00 .00
.00 3,460.00 0.0
4,309.00 38,871.00 10.0
.00 12,840.00 0.0
4,128.00 322.00 92.8
11,300.00 151,600.00 6.9
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 300.00 0.0
.00 12,310.00 0.0
740.00 740.00- ***
382.00 382.00- ***
.00 2,990.00 0.0
.00 .00
18.00 18.00- ***
2,424.65 2,424.65- ***
.00 .00
.00 10,760.00 0.0
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 3,520.00 0.0
.00 5,850.00 0.0
.00 .00
1,270.00 1,270.00- ***
.00 .00
187.00 163.00 53.4
4,925.00 4,925.00- ***
PLANNING 340,000.00 55,797.45 55,797.45 284,202.55 16.4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 25, 1998
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of July, 1998.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
July 1998
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: William Hughes
Date: August 13, 1998
WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The contractor is in the process of performing the following constructions items: Grading the new exit
ramp/auxiliary lane, installing electrical conduits, constructing storm drain systems, placing concrete in the
bottom portion of the new bridge section, and installing Gas and SCE conduits with the new bridge cells. Please
note that traffic will be allowed through the work area during construction. Completion of the project, based on
an accelerated schedule including time extensions for weather, is during the month of March 1999.
2. City Wide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS):
The coordination plan has been implemented on all major intersection within the City. Currently, the City is
working with Caltrans to improve the signal timing on Winchester Road and on Rancho Califomia Road at 1-15
ramps.
3. Margarita Community Park Phase I:
The project improvements include restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipment, tennis courts, a
roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well
as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ultimate width. Installation of the concrete walkways,
picnic areas, roller hockey rink and tennis court has been completed. The Margarita Road widening has also
been completed. The ballfield lighting and backstops are presently being installed and the restroom is also
under construction.
The project is estimated to be completed in September 1998, followed by a 90-day landscape maintenance
period.
4. Winchester Creek Park:
The project consists of a 4.5 acre neighborhood park with various improvements including restrooms, basketball
courts, volleyball courts, play equipment, polygon shelters with picnic tables, concrete walkways, and a parking
lot. Installation of the restroom building, concrete flatwork, picnic shade structures, play structures and the
irrigation system has been completed. On-site planting and off-site street widening work are presently under way.
The project is estimated to be completed in September 1998, followed by a 90-day landscape maintenance period.
5. Traffic Signal at Pauba Road and Fire Station 84:
This signal is in operation and the one year warranty will begin when the project has been accepted by the City
Council.
6. Traffic Signal at Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway:
This signal is currently in operation and the one year warranty period will begin as soon as the signal is
accepted by the City Council.
7. Traffic Signal at Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road:
Installation of the traffic signal hardware has been completed and the signal is scheduled to energized on
August 20, 9998.
8. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Santiago Road:
The contractor is currently installing the underground conduits, wiring, and pole foundations.
The anticipated completion date in November 1998.
9. Flashing Beacons at Various Locations:
A pre-construction was held on July 16. The poles and equipment are on order. Once they arrive the
contractor expects to complete the flashing beacons at 9 school site within a week.
BID:
1. Temecula Duck Pond Park:
The Temecula Duck Pond Park Project will include both park and off-site street improvements. Park
improvements will include a gazebo/bandstand, picnic facilities, a restroom, walkways, a parking lot, security
lighting, monumentation, landscaping and irrigation. The street improvements will consist of the widening
of Ynez Road to full width between Rancho California Road and Tierra Vista Road and will include new
sidewalks along with additional turn lanes, traffic signal modifications at Ynez Road and Rancho California
Road, a new traffic signal at Ynez Road and Tierra Vista Road, and pavement restriping to improve traffic
circulation. The project is presently out to bid with a bid opening date of August 27.
Construction is anticipated to begin in October 1998 with an estimated completion date of March 1999.
2. Winchester Road Sidewalk:
This project is currently out to bid and will open bids on September 3. This project consists of the installation
of sidewalks on the west side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Winchester Creek Avenue.
Construction is anticipated to begin in September 1998 with an estimated completion date of December 1998.
3. Margarita Road Storm Drain:
This project was a part of the Overland Drive and Margarita Road Street Improvement Project. To expedite
the project, City Council authorized the staff to proceed to bid the storm drain system which is in Margarita
Road and to order the material (pipe). Staff has the material on order and this project is currently out to bid
with a bid opening of August 20, 1998. Staff expects to recommend an award of a construction contract to
City Council on August 25, 1998. This project consists of installing 2,000 lineal feet of storm drain in
Margarita Road southerly of Winchester Road and discharging it into Long Canyon Creek northerly of future
Overland Drive intersection with Margarita Road. Due to the location of the proposed storm drain in the
paved section of Margarita Road, temporary pavement widening in Margarita Road will be required to
minimize the disruption of traffic. This widened roadway will remain in place until the reconstruction and
ultimate widening of Margarita Road occurs, later this year.
Construction is anticipated to begin in late August 1998 with an estimated completion date of late October
1998.
WORK IN DESIGN:
1. 1-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement:
The roadway plans have been signed by Caltrans (District 8) and the structural plans have been signed by
Caltrans-Division of Structures. SCE has provided the City with a relocation plan for the SCE overMad power
lines. The SCE overhead power lines will be relocated concurrently with the construction of the improvements.
The City is currently in the process of acquiring right of way, utility easements, and temporary consauction
easements necessary for the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in December 1998 with an estimated
completion date of January 2000.
2. FY96-97 Pavement Management System:
The consultant submitted a plan check to the City on August 6. Staff expects to return the plan check within three
weeks. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to
Rancho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length
of the project.
Construction is anticipated to begin in November 1998 with an estimated completion date of February 1999.
3. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening:
The consultant has returned the plan check comment back to Caltrans. The scope of work includes the street
widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, and the
improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive.
Construction is anticipated to begin in September 1998 with an estimated completion date of June 1999.
4. Overland Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Widening:
The consultant has submitted the consauction plans of the proposed improvements on Overland Drive between
Ynez Road and Margarita Road and Margarita Road from Overland Drive to Winchester Road for Riverside
County Flood Control. The storm drain system in Margarita Road has been separated from the project and is
currently out to bid.
Construction is anticipated to begin in November with an estimated completion date of June 1999.
5. Margarita Road Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba):
The preparation of improvement plans is complete. The improvements will include the installation of concrete
curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road.
The sidewalk will improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive
alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfidds along with
an expanded parking area. The project is anticipated to bid in August.
Construction is anticipated to begin in October 1998 with an estimated completion date of December 1998.
6. I-IS/Winchester Southbound Off-ramp Widening:
The plans and specifications are complete and Calmns has issued a permit for the construction of this project.
Staff anticipates to bid this project in late August, with a construction completion in January 1999.
7. Winchester Road Median Islands:
The plans and specifications have been completed and submitted to Caltrans for approval. Since this project is
partially funded by STP, Caltrans approval is required prior to advertising the project for bids. This project
includes installation of median island with landscaping and imgafion along Winchester Road between Enterprise
Circle West and Jefferson Avenue along with the installation of a traffic signal at Enterprise Circle West. Also,
the existing median island at Jefferson Avenue will be modified to provide for a longer left turn pocket for east
bound traffic.
8. Pala Road Bridge:
A Consultant is in the process of preparing the preliminary documentation required by Caltrans to receive HBRR
Funds as well as performing utility research and design surveys. This project will include the realignment of Pala
Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, which will require that a new bridge be constructed,
two new traffic signals to be installed, the removal of one traffic signal, the installation of sound walls, sidewalks,
landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and provisions for
Wetland Mitigation.
Construction is anticipated to begin in October 1998 with an estimated completing date of December 1999.
9. Traffic Signal at Rancho California Road and Via Los Colinas:
The plans and specifications have been completed and submitted to Caltrans for approval. Since this project
is partially fumed by $TP, Caltrans approval is required prior to advertising the project for bids.
LAND DEVELOPMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
SPECIAL PROJECTS
JULY 1998
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks
Date: August 14, 1998
1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor:
The Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S) interchange improvements including Front
Street realignment and its intersection with Western Bypass Corridor are underway.
2. PW95-08 - First Street Extension:
The construction phasing plans will be completed upon fmalizing the design criteria with Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
3. PW95-26 - 6th Street Parking Project:
Awaiting for the Contractor to submit the affidavit and maintenance bond in order to file the
notice of completion.
4. PW96-05 - Project Study Report (PSR) And Project Report (PR) For Ultimate Interchange
Improvements at Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S):
The PSR analysis will resume once the update on the Circulation Element of the General Plan is
finaled.
5. General Plan Circulation Element Update:
The consultant has been selected. A committee comprised of Cities of Temecula and Murrieta
representatives has been formed to provide direction for the update process.
6. The Regional Mall Project:
The design of the perimeter infrastructure improvements are near completion. The utility
undergrounding is scheduled to begin in August. The design of onsite grading is complete and a
permit may be issued.
7. PW97-05 - The Old Town Streetscape Project:
Construction is in progress and on schedule.
\~TEMEC_FS201 \DATA~DEPT$'~/'~IOACTRJIT~iE'V'~g~/ULY.DOC
Z
o
"' I ° !
Z
LU
[U
UJ
0000
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
Augu~ 3,1998
SUBJECT: Monthly Ac'~vity Report - July, 1998
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-
house personnel for the month of July, 1998:
h SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
II. TREES
A.
21
41
2
12
Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
11,820
72
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
4
Vo
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
2,400
VI.
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
601
VII.
STENCILING
A. 432
B. 19,625
New and repainted legends
L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 61 service order requests ranging from weed
abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is
compared to 26 service order requests for the month of June, 1998.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 126
events and response to street emergencies.
hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
Account No. 5402 $ 21,963.25
Account No. 5401 $ 2,595.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ -0-
CC:
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIPFTraffic)
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
Bill Hughes, Senior Engineer - (CIP)
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of July, 1998
DATE DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK
Date: 07/15/98
Citywide R.O.W. Tree Trimming
Class I
TOTAL COST
~IZE
Trimmed 527 R.O.W. Trees
# 5402
CONTRACTOR:
Date: 07/17/98
#5402
PESTMASTER $Ei~CES
'C' Street Lot & Santiago Slope
TOTAL COST
$ 16,988.25
Sprayed for Lots Weed Abatement
Date: 07/15/98 Seven (7) Maintained City Earthen
Channels
# 5401
TOTAL COST $
Spray Channels for Weed Control
475.0O
CONTRACTOR:
BECKER ENGINEERING
TOTAL COST $ 2,595.00
Date: 07/09/98 ~;il~oOUth of Yorba Avenue on E~v~ttRepair & Replace Portions of 36"
# 5402
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401
$ 21,963.25
$ 2,595.00
$ 4,500.00
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSlON
DATE
RECEIVED
07/01/98
07/01/98
07/01/98
07/02/98
07/00/98
07/02/98
07/02/98
07/06/98
07/06/98
07/06/98
07/07/98
07/07/98
07/07/98
07/08/98
07/09/98
07/09/98
07109198
07109/98
07/09/98
07/09/98
07/09/98
07/10/98
07/13/98
07/13/98
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
LOCATION
30463 DANUBE COURT
42189 AGENA STREET
43020 AO~IA STREET
29611 RAMSEY COURT
42430 COSMIC DRIV~
LA PRIMAVERA AT PAUBA
30209 SIERRA MADRE DRIVE
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. O VINTAGE HILLS DR.
31041 NICHOLAS ROAD
42176 COSMIC DRIVE
VIA NORT~ AT CALLE TORCIDA
29611 RAMSEY COURT
43511 CALLE NACIDO
YNEZ AT PREECE
30680 SANTIAGO ROAD
OLD TOWN
42180 AGENA
27538 ROSEBAY COURT
45990 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
31293 DURNEY
30680 SANTIAGO
42130 AOENA
29962 SANTIAGO ROAD
ENFIELD LANE AT ASHMILL
REQUEST DATE WORK
COMPLKTED
ROOT PRUNE 07/01/98
TREE TRIMMING 07/01/98
TREE TRIM34INO 07101198
TREE TRIMMING 07/02/98
TREE TRIMMING 07/02/98
SINKHOLE 07/02/98
TREE TRIMMING & WEEDS 07/02/98
SINKHOLE 07/06/98
SHOULDER GRADING 07/06/98
TREE TR1MMING 07/06/98
TRIM SHURBS 07/07/98
TREE TRIMMING 07/07/98
REPAIR S.N.S. 07/07/98
GRAFFITI 07/08/98
GRADE ROAD 07/09/98
HANG BANNERS 07/09/98
POTHOLES 07/09/98
STUMP GRINDING 07/09/98
TREE TRIMMING 07/09/98
TREE REMOVAL 07/09/98
ROAD GRINDING 07/09/98
TREE TRIMMING 07/10/98
A.C. PATCHING 07/13/98
S.N.S. REPAIR 07/13/98
\\TEMEC_F~01 ~DATA'~DE~AIN~W'KCMPLTD~O~y REPORT.DOC
D '
07/13/998
07/13/998
07/14/98
07/14/98
07/15/98
07115198
07115/98
07115198
07/16/98
07/16/98
07/17198
07/17198
07/20/98
07121/98
07/21/98
07/21/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/22/98
07/23/98
07/23/98
07/23198
07/24/98
07/24/98
07/27/98
07/27/98
07/27/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
31661 CORTE ROSARIO
45566 MASTERS DRIVE
30101 Li~VANDE PLACE
31617 CORTE SALINAS
KAHWEA SOUTH OF NORTHBOUND COURT
NORTH OFaNERAL KEARNY AT SAOEA~VOOD
45620 HOPACTONG
31278 BOCAW CIRCLE
SOLANA WAY EAST OF YNEZ
45620 HOPACTONG
30116 SANTA CECIR.IA
22132 RAVEN WAY
31199 KAHWF, A
28841 VALLFJO
29549 CARA WAY
45590 CLUBHOUSE
31159 CORTE ALHAMBRA
31712 CORTE ENCINAS
TI~RRA ALTA WAY AT AVENIDA ALVARADO
30948 GREENSBORO DRIVE
39640 DIEGO DRIVE
42769 TERRA ROBLES
31284 KAHWEA ROAD
27538 ROSEBAY COURT
42933 CALA ROSSO
32068 CORTB ESCOBAR
30460 SUMMERSIDE
42952 VIA ALHAMBRA
38534 VIA AMARILLA
MARGARITA SOUTH OF PAUBA
MAROARrrA SOUTH OF PAUBA
REQUEST
STORM DRAIN CLOC~ED
FENCE DOWN
CHR.D AT PLAY SION
POTHOLES
TREE TRIMMING
FENCE REPAIR
BARRICADE PICK-UP
DEBRIS CLEAN-UP
TREE TRIMMING
TREE TRIMMING
TREE REMOVAL
STREET FAILURE
STREET FAILURE
CURB GRINDING
STORM DRAIN PLUGGED
FENCE REPAIR
STUMP REMOVAL
DEBRIS REMOVAL
CURB GRINDING
CURB GRINDING
STORM DRAIN PLUGGED
DEBRIS PICK-UP
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
DATE WORK
· CObiPLETED
07/13/98
07/13/98
07/14/98
07/14/98
07/15/98
07/15/98
07/15/98
07/15/98
07/16/98
07/20/98
07/17/98
07/17/98
07/20/98
07121198
07/22/98
07/21/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/22/98
07/23/98
07/23/98
07/23/98
07/24/98
07/24/98
07/27/98
07/27/98
07/27/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
\\TEMEC_F~201 ~DATA~DE~AIN~WKCMPLTD~OR~9g~OLy REPORT.DOC
07/28/98 47549 ROSEBAY COURT STUMP GRINDING 07/28/98
07/29/98 42180 SWEETSHADE POTHOLED 07/29/98
07/29/98 3~D & MERCEDF~ STORM DRAIN REPAIR 07/29/98
07/29/98 31284 KAHWEA FENCE REPAIR
07/29/98
07/30/98 31956 CERCLE CHAMBERLIN CRACKED SIDEWALK 07/30/98
07/30/98 45932 PARSIPANNY COURT TREE TRIMMING 07/30/98
TOTAL SERVICE
ORDER REQUESTS
\\TEMEC_F820 I~DATA~D~AI~WKCMPLTDk~O~Y REIN3RT. DOC
DATE
07/06/98
07/06/98
07/07/98
07/08/98
07/09/98
07/10/98
07/13/98
07/14/98
07/15/98
07/16/98
07/20/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/23/98
07/24/98
07/29/98
07/30/98
07/31/98
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
LOCATION
43125 CORTE ALMONTE
40585 LA COLINA
PAUBA 750' WEST OF VIA RAMI
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD E/O MEADOW PARKWAY
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
SANTIAGO ROAD
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
LOS RANCH1TOS AREA
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
LOS RANCHITO$ AREA
LOS RANCHrros AREA
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
LOS RANCHITOS AREA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
PALA ROAD AT HURON
RIO NEDO AT TIERRA ALTA WAY
SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL
TONS
R & R A.C. 16 1
INSTALLED 10 L.F.A.C. gERM 1
OVERLAY A.C. 1,170 6
OVERLAY A.C. 216 3
OVERLAY A.C. 734 4
OVERLAY A.C. 561 3
OVERLAY A.C. 1,313 6.5
OVERLAY A.C. 1,040 6.0
OVERLAY A.C. 1,120 6
OVERLAY A.C. 1,048 6
OVERLAY A.C. 724 3.5
OVER.LAY A.C. 708 3.5
OVERLAY A.C. 1,032 3.0
OVERLAY A.C. 1,040 3.5
OVERLAY A.C. 439 2.5
R & R A.C. 315 3.5
R & R A.C. 245 6.5
R & R A.C. 89 3.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS
TOTAL TONS
11,810
R:~tAINTAINIWKCMPLTEhASPHALT. RPR'~'ULY REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07/13/98 AREA II REPAINTED 3,824 L.F. OF RED CURB
07/13/98 AREA H REPAINTED 9 LEGENDS
07/14/98 AREA H REPAINTED 20 LEGENDS
07/15/98 AREA H REPAINTED 31 LEGENDS
07/16/98 AREA//4 REPAINTED 30 LF.~ENDS
07/20/98 MA.IOR ARTERIALS "NIGHT WORK" REPAINTED 103 LEGENDS
07/21/98 MAJOR ARTERIALS "NIGHT WORK" REPAINTED 83 LEGENDS
07/22/98 MAJOR ARTERIALS 'NIGHT WORK" REPAINTED 60 LEGENDS
07/23/98 MA.IOR ARTERIALS "NIGHT WORK" REPAINTED 49 LEGENDS
07/24/98 MAJOR ARTERIALS "NIGHT WORK" REPAINTED 47 LEGENDS
07/27/98 AREA g2 REPAINTED 5,837 L.F. RED CURB
07/28/98 AREA g2 REPAINTED 4,770 L.F. RED CURB
07/29/98 AREA//2 REPAINTED 3,269 L.F. RED CURB
07/31/98 AREA g2 REPAINTED 8.59 L.F. RED CURB
07/31/98 AREA #3 REPAINTED 1,066 L.F. RED CURB
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 492
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 19.625
R:~INTAINkWKCMPLTD~'rRIPIN~Y REPORT.DOC
DATE
07/06/98
07/08/98
07/08/98
07/13/98
07/14/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/24/98
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
LOCATION
RAMSEY AT MARGARrrA
VIA NORTE AT CALLE TORCIDA
29611 RAMSEY COURT
31293 DURNEY
30101 LEVANDE PLACE
LA SERBNA AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
VICCI AT CORTE CABRERA
PAUBA AT ELINDA
WOKK COMPLETED
TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TR~P-S
TRIMMED I R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED ! R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W.
TREES TRIMMED 12
R:XMAINTAIN~WKCM PLTI~TREE fi'~'ULY REFORT.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
DATE
07/01/98
07/01/98
07/06/98
07/06/98
07/06/98
07/08/98
07/09/98
07/09/98
07/13/98
07/13/98
07/13/98
07/13/98
07/14/98
07/14/98
07/14/98
07/15/98
07/16/98
07/16/98
0716/98
07/17/98
07/20/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/22/98
LOCATION
CALLE CHAPOS AT WALCOTT
29140 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
STONEWOOD AT MARGARITA
PIG PICO AT MARGARITA
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY AT MARGARITA
YNEZ AT HORSE CROSSING
YNEZ AT WINCHESTER
NICOLAS ROAD SOUTH OF IOSEPH ROAD
RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA
DURNEY AT VINTAGE
MEADOWS AT CAFERA
CALLE NACIDO AT CORTE COPA
MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD
MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF MARGARITA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD FAST OF MARGARITA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF MARGARITA
SANTIAGO AT FRONT
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD FAST OF MARGARITA
VIA RAMI AT CORTE CABRERA
CALLE PINA COLADA AT DEL REY
VICCI AT CORTE CABRERA
AMARITA AT VIA RICCI
WORK COM PI,ETED
INSTALLED R-2 "30"
INSTALLED 2 HOUSING PROGRAM SIGNS
REPAIRED R-1
INSTALLED R-l, TYPE N, TYPE K
REPLACED R - 2' 45" "T. C."
REPLACED 6 DELINEATORS "MISSING"
REPLACED P~H;~K ~ Ril)E ``T. C."
REPLACED CARSONITE "MISSING"
REPLACED "K" MARKER "T.C."
REPLACED R-1 FADED
REPLACED R-1 FADED
INSTALLED S.N.S.
INSTALLED W-9
REPLACED W-75 "FADED"
INSTALLED 7 R-26
INSTALLED $ R-26
INSTALLED R-1
INSTALLED 14 R-26
REPLACED R1-2 "T.C."
INSTALLED 3 R-26
INSTAT-L-ElD 2 N.W.S.
REPLACE CARSONITE
INSTALLED N.W.S. / REPLACE R-1
REPLACED R-1 "FADED"
\\TEMEC_Fg20 I~DATA~DE~AIN'~WKCMPLTD~IGN S~g~RJLY REPORT.doe
DATE
07/22/98
07/23/98
07/23/98
LOCATION
SOLANA AT MARGARITA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT FRONT
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT LYNDIE LANE
WORK COMPLETED
REPLACED W-17
REPLACED R1-2
REPLACED R-2
GRAFFITI
T.C.
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED
21
\kTEMEC_FS20 I~)ATA~d3E~W'hMAINTAIN~WKCMPLTD~IGNI~g~IULY REPORT. do~
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
DATE
07/09/98
07/09/98
LOCATION
JEFFERSON AT WINCHESTER
V~A LOBO CHANNEL
WORK COMPLETED
ABATED 1,400 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
ABATED 1,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED
\\TEMEC-FS"20 ! ~DATA~DEPTS~J~tA-~AIN~WKCMPLTD\WEED~g~..Y REPORT.DOC
07/01/98
07/01/98
07/01/98
07/02/98
07/02/98
07/06/98
07/07/98
07/09/98
07/09/98
07/21/98
07/22/98
07/24/98
07/28/98
07/28/98
07/29198
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF JULY, 1998
LOCATION I
STREET
SANTIAGO AT "C"
AVENIDA BARCA AT MARGARITA
MUIRFIRIJ~ AT PALA ROAD
YNEZ AT PREECE
COUNTRY GLEN AT VIO RIO TEMECULA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE
HWY. 79S AT WABASH
YNEZ AT PREECE
MARGARITA AT PAUBA
MARGARITA AT SOLANA
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT NO. GENERAL KEARNY
HWY. 79S AT COUNTRY GLEN
RANCHO VISTA AT HIGH SCHOOL
MARGARITA AT PAUBA
NICHOLAS AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNY
WORK COMPLETED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOV-ED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
35 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
65 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
200 $.F. OF GRAFFITI
80 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 601
TOTAL LOCATIONS 1~
R:'~'~AIN'~WKC M PLTD\GRA~FH I~'~0LY REPORT. DOC
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0