HomeMy WebLinkAbout090898 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
SEPTEMBER 8, 1998
'~!'.*:.~0':;P;Mi .;,~lb'sediS,~b~b~::6f'th..e... Ci~ COuncil pursuant~t~0ve~m'ent 'Code
· 'Se~ti.o.n~': .........' · ....:..::.:...:.~:;:.:.::.: ....· .........:::~';':::;~":~:'~';::':'::':'.:';;:.:..~.:':.:..: ........................' ........· ... :.?""" ' :.:......;": .....
'. ~,. 'con~:~nce:.wiffi: :ma l,propb~:~,:~g~iiat0r, pu~ua'nt:,tO'Govemme:~':Code:Section
~956,;8 'a:cq~iSi~i0n':0~'~real:'prope~.:located:. at 42~9.M:ai~.Stmet,.
· Teme;~u~:::(~:PN;:9~36~2~Q)~"~;`~nt~:~Street~PN:9~22~35;~:286~7 Front
:stt~st:.~:(~PN:922-045~O~7)~28735Pujdl:Stmet (APN 922~6,~0t~)~,.287..q~Pujol;:Street
(APN 922-0~2:~0~)~:'::~25 P~jol.~Street..(APN'.92:2~2~:,: ~22~~' :S,i:":>~:"~treet(APN
' 922-0'52~'1't), .:,0 SitUS. :(A~ ~~::b'~0), 418:30 :~Si~:ih' Street
41858 .Fi~h:S~eet;~(APN~"922:031 ~09), 41843 FiSh. Stre:et~(APN 92,~02~0~0). The
negotiat;'~g:'pa~ies are the Ci~ of Tem~'CUl~p:arcel~::Of;:Redevelopment Agency of the
Ci~.of TemeCUla and::Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold, Ladanyi Rutner, .Corbin, Ciais,
O~o lot, Pelonero,.Valencia, and:.Eppenger.. Under'negotiation is the .price and terms
of payment of. ~e 'real .pr~e~;:i'~te.reS~'.:.prop0sed: to:: be acq ui red~:~::.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 98-17
Resolution: No. CSD 98-88
Milja Harper
Pastor Cary Wacker of Rancho Baptist Church
Councilman Comerchero
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts
R:~Agenda\090898
1
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Special Achievement Award to John Romano for attaining Eagle Scout.
Special Achievement Award to Brookie Skousen
Off-Road Vehicle Enforcement Presentation - Sergeant Mitch AIm
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an
item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a
five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, then (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
Enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance Adol3tion Procedure
RECOMMENDATON:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 25, 1998.
R:~Agenda\090898
2
3 Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1998.
Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance A~reement
6
RECOMMENDATION:
5, 1 Terminate the existing agreement with the County of Riverside dated June 26, 1990;
5.2 Approve the agreement with the County of Riverside for maintenance of traffic signals
and safety lighting and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
Accept Substitute Securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Purposes in Parcel Map No. 24085-3 (located northwesterly of the intersection of Diaz Road
and Zevo Drive -Avenida de Ventas)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Purposes in Parcel Map No. 24085-3;
6.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Securities on file with the City Clerk;
6.3 Authorize release of the cash deposits which secured Faithful Performance and Labor
and Materials;
6.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
R:~,genda\090898
3
7
Accept Substitute Agreement and Securities in Tract No. 23143-1 (southeasterly of the
intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities in Tract No.
23143-1;
7.2 Authorize an eighteen-month (18) extension of time;
7.3 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, Traffic Signal
Mitigation, Erosion Control, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities on file;
7.4 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developers and Sureties.
Release Labor and Materials security for Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 27987-1
(located south of Hi.qhwav 79 South between Redhawk Parkway and Countrv Glen Way)
9
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials security for the Public Improvements in
Parcel Map No. 27987-1;
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety,
Extension of the Prohibition on Consumption of Alcoholic Bevera.qes to Chardonnay Hills
Homeowner's Association Propertv Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.030
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION ON CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES TO CHARDONNAY HILLS HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
PROPERTY PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.14.030
10 Resolution in Opposition to Proposition 9 - Electric Restructurin,cl Initiative
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\090898
4
11
12
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
A RESOLUTION OF THE
TEMECULA IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 9, THE
RATE REDUCTION AND REFORM ACT
Purchase of Three {3) Public Works Vehicles
RECOMM EN DATION:
11.1
CITY OF
UTILITY
Approve the purchase of three (3) 1999 Chevrolet full-sized trucks from Paradise
Chevrolet/Buick in the amount of $74,647.71.
Second Readin.a of Ordinance No. 98-16
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION
17.24.020.D OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE OF VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~genda\090898
5
..... · ~.~.~.~ .~... ..... ' ..~.~.~.:.' ~.:~'~'...'~:.' ..'~..~ '~:'.~::'~. '
TEMECU~ '~'MMUNI~ SERVICES'DiSTRICT MEETING.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01
Resolution: No. CSD 98-17
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors
on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
For individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 25, 1998.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
R:~Agenda\090898
6
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 22, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\090898
7
TEMECULA :R'EDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
'" "
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 98-01
Resolution: No. RDA 98-14
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors
on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
For individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 25, 1998.
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL- Mayor Roberts
R:~Agenda\090898
8
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Award a Professional Services Agreement to Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates,
Inc. to perform Services to Update the City of Temecula's Redevelopment Plan
Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. PA98-0110)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $34,620.00 to Robert
Bein, William Frost and Associates, Inc. to perform Services to update the City of
Temecula's Redevelopment Plan Environmental Impact Report.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts
AGENCY BUSINESS
3 Authorization to Advertise for Construction Bids for Old Town Streetscape Concrete and
Granite Intersection Treatments - Project No. PW97-05
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to advertise for construction bids for
concrete and granite intersection treatments in the Old Town Streetscape project.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 22, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District
Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\090898
9
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of
The project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
13
Plannin.cl ADDlication No. PA98-0297 (Zonincl Amendment, Development Code) - an
amendment to the City's Development Code, addincl Section 17.08.050. S (Automobile,
Motorcvcle, and Truck DealershiD Landscape Standards) to the Development Code
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning
Amendment, Development Code);
13.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE
CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE, AND
TRUCK DEALERSHIPS
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14
A Professional Services A~reement with Kevser Marston Associates to Perform Services
to Prepare a Market Study and Feasibility Analysis for a Convention/Conference Facilitv in
Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Direct the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with
Keyser Marston Associates to prepare a Market Study and Feasibility Analysis for a
Convention/Conference Facility in Temecula in an amount of $34,000;
14.2
Appropriate $34,000 (contract amount of $31,500 plus estimated expenses of
$2,500) from General Fund unreserved fund balance to the Economic Development
Department consulting budget.
R:~Agenda\090898
10
15
16
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition in Eminent
Domain of Property for Community Facilities in the Old Town Area (Temecula Mercantile
Building)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Consider adoption of proposed Resolution No. 98- , a Resolution of Necessity
of the City of Temecula declaring certain real property necessary for public
purposes and authorizing the acquisition thereof in connection with the Old Town
Area Community Facilities;
15.2
Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of
Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this report, take
testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and
consider all of the evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution,
which requires a unanimous or 4/5ths vote;
15.3
If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in
this report, the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence
warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolution of
Necessity, then the staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its
discretion, adopt proposed Resolution No. 98- (which requires a 4/Sths vote of
the entire Council) and the following authorize that an eminent domain proceeding
be filled to acquire the subject property interests:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION
WITH COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN THE OLD TOWN AREA
(TEMECULA MERCANTILE BUILDING)
Designation of Voting Dele.qate for California League of Cities Annual Conference
17
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Designate a voting delegate and an alternate.
Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Appoint a member to serve an unexpired term of the Old Town Redevelopment
Advisory Committee.
R:~Agenda\090898
11
18 Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Fundin.q Recluest
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Consider an $18,000 funding request from the Temecula Valley Playhouse for their
community service programs.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
GIT¥ ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 22, 1998, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\090898
12
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTATION BY
SERGEANT MITCH ALM
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEEGTING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 25, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at 420549 Main Street (APN 922-036-020),
28545 Front Street (APN 922-035-001 ), 28677 Front Street (APN 922-045-017), 28725 Pujol
Street (APN 922-062-010), 42291 Sixth Street (APN 922-052-011 ), no situs (APN 922-053-
080), 41830 Sixth Street (APN 922-031-018), 41858 Fifth Street (APN 922-031-009), and 41843
Fifth Street (APN 922-022-010). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/parcels of
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold, Cadeus
Properties, Ladanyi, Rutner, Corbin, Ciais, Otto lot, Pelonero, Valencia, and Eppenger. Under
negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be
conveyed and/or acquired.
2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28721 Front Street (APN 922-073-017,
APN 922-046-033, and APN 922-073-024). The negotiating parties are the City of
Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Cleveland Investment Co., and
Margaret and William Fortner. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment of the real
property interests proposed to be acquired.
3. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) with respect to one (1) matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following
case will be discussed: Strachota Insurance Agency vs. the City of Temecula.
4. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b) with respect to three matters of potential litigation. With respect to each matter, the
City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant
exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the Agency based on existing facts and
circumstances.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and
Roberts.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Chris Jordan.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John R. Chambers of Grace Presbyterian Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Stone.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Mr. Sandy Dodson, 27468 Ynez Road, introduced the" The Little Professor' (mascot of
the Little Professor Book Company) and thanked the City Council and the residents for their
support in welcoming him to the City.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Referencing the fast-growing, highly water absorbent Arunda weed, Mayor Pro Tem
Ford noted that this weed was initially planted for erosion control purposes; that it has been
discovered that this weed is extremely invasive; that it is a fire hazard; and that it should be
eradicated throughout the City,
Director of Public Works Kicak noted that staff would provide information with regard to
eradication efforts.
B. Mayor Roberts invited the public to attend the performance of the Nakayama Mayu
Friendship Choir that will be celebrating its 25th Anniversary by performing on Friday, August 29,
1998, at Chaparral High School at 7:00 P.M.
C. In an effort to further enhance the Councilmembers ability to communicate with the
residents, Mayor Roberts advised that his and Councilman Stone's E-mail addresses have been
set up and that the remaining Councilmembers' E-mail addresses should be set up shortly.
CONSENTCALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford abstained with regard to this item.
2
4
6
Resolution ADproving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT
A
Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement with Riverside
County and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the amendment, final
form to be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
Approval of Contracts for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve an agreement for Consultant Services with Esgil Corporation to perform
plan review services for the Building and Safety Department for a term of three (3)
years, expiring June 30, 2001;
5.2 Approve an agreement for Consultant Services with VanDorpe Chou and
Associates to perform Plan Review Services for the Building and Safety Department
for a term of three 93) years, expiring June 30, 2001.
Tract Map No. 23371-10 (located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive)
RECOMMENDATOIN:
6.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23371-10 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
6.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
6.3 Approve Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
bond, Labor and Materials bond and Monument bond as security for the
agreements.
Tract MaD No. 23371-9 (located south of La Serena Drive west of Temeku Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23371-9 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
3
8
10
11
7.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
7.3 Approve Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials bond and Monument bond as security for the
agreements.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Securitv in Tract No. 24133-5 (located westerlv of
Montele.qro Way between McCabe Drive and Leena Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 24133-5;
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-1 ('located northwesterlv
corner of the intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9, 1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation security in Tract No. 27827~1;
9,2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-F (northwesterly corner
of the intersection of North General Kearnv Road at Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation Security in Tract No. 27827-F;
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Acceptance of Easement Deeds, Offers of Dedication, and Rights of entn/and Temporan/
Construction A.qreements for the Promenade Mall Infrastructure Off-Site Storm Drain, and
Related Purposes (located southwesterIv of Mar.~arita Road at Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION;
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ACCEPTING CERTAIN EASEMENT DEEDS FOR SLOPE AND STORM
DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, OFFERS OF
DEDICATION FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY AND
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENTS FACILITATIN
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE
MALL PROJECT
12 Sewer Facilities A.clreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for Relocation of
Sanitary Sewer for Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15, Project No.
PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale and authorize the Mayor to
execute both documents;
12.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering,
inspection, and testing fees in the amount of $4,470.00.
13 Resolution in Suppod of Railroad to Railroad Grade Separation at Colton, California
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING THE RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT AT
COLTON, CALIFORNIA
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 13. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Ford who abstained with regard to Consent Calendar Item
No. 2 (approval of Minutes of August 11, 1998).
Discussed out of order ...
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19 Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Fundin.~ ReQuest
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Consider an $18,000 funding request from the Temecula Valley
Playhouse for their community service programs.
Finance Director Roberrs presented the staff report (of record), advising, in response to
Councilman Stone, that the appropriation for this request could be funded through the
Community Services Budget.
Ms. Patty Drew, Vice President of Temecula Valley Playhouse, requested the City Council's
approval of this funding request; noted that Playhouse membership has increased; and that the
rent has been increased. In response to Councilman Comerchero's comment as to why no
fundraising efforts were accounted for, Ms. Drew advised that the Playhouse will continue its
yearly fundraising efforts and that appropriate information could be provided to the Council.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue this matter to the September 8, 1998, City
Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
20 Arts Council of Temecula Valley Community Service Funding Request
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Review and consider the Arts Council of Temecula Valley Funding
request for $22,000 for their community service programs.
Finance Director Roberts reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material).
Ms. Martha Minkler, Arts Council Executive Director, addressed the City Council and thanked
the Council for its consideration of this funding request.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve the Arts Council of Temecula Valley funding
request in the amount of $22,000. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ford and
voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 7:16 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District,
the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Winchester Hills Financing Authority
during which the following Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Item was
discussed: Award a Professional Services Agreement to Robert Bein, Wiliam Frost &
Associates, Inc. At 8:13 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City
Council business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14
Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels per Ordinance No. 91-
18, Chapter 6, 16
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
6
RESOLUTION NO. 98-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST
PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF
ABATEMENTS AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION
Chief Building Official Elmo presented the staff report (as per agenda material).
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-16. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
15
Plannin.cl Application No. PA97-0349 - Amendment to Sections of the City's
Development Code pertaining to On-Site Storage of Vehicles (including
Recreational vehicles in residential zones)
RECOM M ENDATION:
15.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA97-0349;
15.2 Ready by title only and introduce and ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION 17.24.020.D OF THE
TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN
VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material);
referenced the Planning Commission's recommendation (of record); clarified that RVs must be
stored on an impermeable hardened surface and screened with a fence at least 5' in height;
thanked Associate Planner Fagan for his efforts with regard to this issue; advised that staff had
received letters in support and against the proposed Ordinance; and reviewed various options
available to the City Council.
Councilman Lindemans stated that the storage of recreational vehicles is segregated into the
following two categories: developments with CC&Rs that prohibit the parking of RVs and
developments in which the CC&Rs are silent and/or allow RVs.
In response to Councilman Comerchero's comment, City Attorney Thorson advised that it would
be legally feasible to implement a sticker system for those individuals storing RVs in
developments not governed by CC&Rs, thereby, exempting the RV for the length of time it was
owned by the property owner.
With regard to the proposed front yard setback, Mayor Pro Tem Ford, echoed by Mayor
Roberts, noted that this setback requirement would not be applicable for lots larger than % acre
in size. Mr. Thornhill advised that the front yard setback is determined from the public street.
7
Associate Planner Fagan clarified that a passenger pick-up truck utilized for every day travel
would be exempt from the proposed Ordinance but that a commercial vehicle would have to
comply with the Development Code provision relative to length, height, and width otherwise it
would be prohibited.
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke in support of the proposed Ordinance:
Patricia Hall - 27483 Lark Court
Frank Geyer - 40466 Chauncey Way
Bill Gray - 40414 Yardley Court
Anna Bale - 29901 Corte Castille
David Micheal - 30300 Churchill Court
Jim Porter - 40221 Tuolomne Court
Cecilia Axton - 30169 Sierra Madre Drive
Leonard Borok - 30476 Milano Road
Daniel Reagle - 45524 Olympic Way
The above-mentioned individuals spoke in support of the proposed Ordinance for the following
reasons:
that the majority of the residents are in support of the proposed Ordinance;
that residents should be required to comply with the existing CC&Rs;
that the visual appearance of stored RVs is unsightly and, therefore, has
decreased neighboring property values;
that stored RVs should be properly screened and situated on an appropriate pad.
It was suggested by Mr. Reagle that the allowable loading/unloading period should be extended
from two days to three days.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed Ordinance:
Ed EIder
Don Gravett -
Geri Williamson -
Robert Williamson -
no address given; speaking for Mr. Eddie Salitore,
42733 San Julian Road;
30258 Mira Loma Drive
30219 Villa Alturas Drive
30219 Villa Alturas Drive
The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed Ordinance for the
following reasons:
that the Council should not zone a community based on aesthetic appearance;
that existing CC&Rs permit the on-site storage of RVs;
that storing a RV at a facility would not be as safe as storing it in the driveway;
that a two-day loading/unloading period is insufficient;
that the cost of a Code Enforcement Officer could be utilized to hire additional
Police Officers;
that there are insufficient facilities available throughout the City to accommodate
the necessary need for RV storage;
that the on-site storage of RVs does not decrease neighboring property values.
It was suggested by Mr. EIder that a sticker system be implemented to grandfather specific RVs.
Respecting those residents who have chosen to live in a development with no CC&Rs,
Councilman Stone stated that as long as the RV is operable, not sitting on jacks, properly fits
into the driveway, does not extend into the backyard from the driveway, into the sidewalk, or
street, and no one is living in the RV, the resident should be permitted to park the RV on site.
Mr. Stone noted that prior to mandating the requirement of storing RVs, the City must ensure
sufficient facilities are available to accommodate this request. In an effort to minimize the
impact this Ordinance may have on private lives and understanding the concerns with regard to
aesthetic appearance, Councilman Stone noted that if on-site RV storage were permitted, strict
guidelines would have to be implemented to minimize potential aesthetic blight.
Community Development Director Thornhill clarified that CC&Rs are privately agreed upon by
the homeowner at the time of purchase and that the City does not enforce CC&Rs.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford stated that for those developments with CC&Rs but no homeowners
association to enforce the CC&Rs, RV storage concerns should be addressed by the
Development Code. For those developments with no CC&Rs, Mayor Pro Tem Ford relayed his
opposition to requiring those residents to adhere to the proposed Ordinance.
Segregating the on-site parking of RVs into two categories, Councilman Comerchero stated the
following:
that those individuals who bought a home, signed a document agreeing to
abide by the CC&Rs, whether enforced or not, and are parking a RV in the
driveway, have been violating the intent of the CC&Rs; and that these individuals
should be required to comply with the intent of the CC&Rs;
that those individuals who intentionally or unintentionally bought a home in a
development with no CC&Rs, and/or no homeowners association, or where
the CC&Rs do not prohibit the on-site storage of RVs, should be permitted to
continue to park their RV on their property by way of a sticker system;
that if CC&Rs prohibit RV storage, the City Council has a responsibility to
address the compliance issue;
that '~ acre lots or larger should be exempt from the proposed Ordinance;
Following additional discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council that a six-month grace
period be authorized; that an additional Code Enforcement Officer be hired as recommended
by the Planning Commission; and that the loading/unloading period be extended from two days
to three days and the following motion was offered:
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to adopt the Negative Declaration for PA97-0349
and to adopt Ordinance No. 98-16 modified as follows:
that those individuals living in a development with CC&Rs which prohibit the
parking of RVs, etc. in the driveway must comply with the Development Code;
that those individuals living in a development with no CC&Rs or with CC&Rs
which do not prohibit RV storage will not be required to comply with the
Development Code and may park in the driveway;
that properties % acre in size or larger will be exempt from the Development
Code regulation for RVs, etc.;
that a six-month grace period be authorized.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans. Prior to the voice vote (see below),
additional Council discussion ensued.
In response to Councilman Stone's comment with regard to enforcement and related costs, City
Attorney Thorson advised that the City's Administrative Ordinance enables the City to bypass
the court system, thereby, decreasing enforcement costs. Mr. Thorson briefly reviewed the
enforcement procedure, advising that the proposed Ordinance would be part of the Zoning
Ordinance and, therefore, enforcement procedures would be the same for the proposed
Ordinance as those for any violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Thorson noted that City staff
will have to design a map which would accurately reflect those areas subject to CC&Rs and
those areas which will be exempt. At this time, City Attorney Thorson read Ordinance
No. 98-16 by title only.
City Manager Bradley reiterated that it is the City's policy to encourage voluntary compliance
and that citations would only be issued as a last resort.
At this time, voice vote on the previously made motion reflected unanimous approval.
At 10:00 P.M., a short recess was called and the City Council meeting was reconvened at 10:12
P.M.
16 Adoption of Zoning Regulations and Licensin.q of Sexually Oriented Businesses
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act for the proposed ordinance;
16.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING REGULATION AND
LICENSING OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR
SUCH REGULATIONS
In light of the recommended continuance, City Attorney Thorson advised that this item would be
renoticed and that the interim Ordinance will expire October 15, 1998.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Ford moved to continue Agenda Item No. 16 to the September 22,
1998, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
10
17 Murrieta Creek Project Committee Membershil~
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Appoint one member of the City Council to serve on the Murrieta Creek
Project Committee.
Following some Council discussion, the following motion was offered:
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to appoint Councilman Stone to this Committee and
to appoint Mayor Pro Tem Ford as the alternate. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
18 Award of Construction Contract for Mar.aarita Road Storm Drain - Project No.
PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Award construction contract for the Margarita Road Storm Drain -
Project No. PW97-07 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
18.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount which is 10% of the contract amount.
Public Works Director Kicak presented the staff report (of record), noting that the contract does
include a liquidated damages provision.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to concur with the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
19 Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Fundin.q Request
Previously discussed; see page 6.
20 Arts Council of Temecula Valley Community Service Funding Request
Previously discussed; see page 6.
21 Temecula Library Services
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Discuss a possible agreement with the City of Murrieta and County of
Riverside regarding the Temecula Library.
Senior Management Analyst Kuhns presented the staff report (as per agenda material) and
referenced Mayor van Haasters' written communication to the City.
Clarifying the required action this evening, Mayor Roberrs noted that the City Council would be
to authorize the City Attorney to draw up an agreement with the County of Riverside and that
this agreement would be reviewed and acted upon at the City Council's next meeting.
11
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to authorize the City Attorney to draw up an
agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula concurring with the
request from the City of Murrieta to release the appropriate County Library mitigation funds to
the City of Murrieta. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
With great pleasure, City Manager Bradley introduced newly hired Assistant City Manager Jim
O'Grady.
Assistant City Manager O'Grady relayed his delight with having the opportunity to work for the
City of Temecula.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With regard to Closed Session Item No. 1, City Attorney Thorson noted that this item was not
discussed; with regard to Item No. 2, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council gave
direction to him and the City Manager; and with regard to Item Nos. 3 and 4, City Attorney
Thorson advised that the City Council gave direction to him.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:36 p.m., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
September 8, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
12
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $1,690,680.92.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 8th day of September, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Rosos 98- 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 8th day of September, 1998 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 98- 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/14/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/20/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/27/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/08/98 TOTALCHECKRUN:
08r20/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09/08198 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 R DA-LOWIMO D
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
260 CFD 88-12 CAPITAL PROJECT
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
3..',',',',',',',',~)SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACI L ITI E S
460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE
285,309.76
922.04
36,283.73
53,645.94
6,015.03
231.81
7,448.24
524.39
85,972.59
1,701.74
12,218.51
307.30
20,764.92
2,501.75
2,435.88
1,010,313.24
512.00
1,130,354.92
279,018.82
116,710.23
164,084.95
1,690,680.92
1,526,595.97
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
165 R DA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
250 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACI LITI ES
TOTAL BY FUND:
I'RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANA E ~
113,706.57
2,321.80
35,948.51
69.65
177.98
2,169.77
968.40
1,246.24
664.57
2,795.41
1,070.97
3,844.88
164,084.95
1,699j680.92
..... HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
08/14/98
15:48
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TOTAL
AMOUNT
112.00
400.00
512.00
VOUCHRE2
08/14/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51030
51031
51032
15:48
CHECK
DATE
08/14/98
08/14/98
08/14/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002323
002323
003355
VENDOR
NAME
SECRETARY OF STATE
SECRETARY OF STATE
OLIVERAS, MARIO
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
NOTARY EXAM FEE: JONES,SUSAN
NOTARY EXAM:BALLREICH,MICHAELA
ENTERTAINMENT FOR TCSD EVENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-120-999-5226
001-120-999-5226
190-183-999-5370
ITEM
AMOUNT
40.00
72.00
400.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
40.00
72.00
400.00
TOTAL CHECKS 512.00
VOUCHRE2
08/19/98
15:32
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
140 COMHUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA DEV- LOW/HOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTENS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
AMOUNT
58,954.42
922.04
1,983.29
24,008.76
5,986.10
160.00
5,714.42
110.83
1,410.63
3~708.85
93.33
17,588.93
24.00
743,58
1,008,945.74
TOTAL 1,130,354.92
VOUCHRE2
08/19/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51033
910002
51036
51036
51036
51036
51037
51037
51038
51039
51040
51041
51042
51043
51043
51044
51045
51046
51047
51047
51047
51048
51049
51050
51051
51051
51052
51053
51053
51054
51054
15:32
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
08/17/98 SAN DIEGO PADRES
08/18/98 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL
08/20/98 003216 1ST MECHANICAL, INC
08/20/98 003216 1ST MECHANICAL, INC
08/20/98 003216 1ST MECHANICAL, INC
08/20/98 003216 1ST MECHANICAL, INC
08/20/98 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PR1
08/20/98 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
08/20/98 003358 ACTION GARAGE DOUR SERV
08/20/98 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP
08/20/98 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS
08/20/98 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/20/98 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
08/20/98 003017 BALDERSON, SCOTT
08/20/98 003017 BALDERSON, SCOTT
08/20/98 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
08/20/98 BETTS, SUSAN
08/20/98 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SY
08/20/98 003138 CAL MAT
08/20/98 003138 CAL MAT
08/20/98 003138 CAL MAT
08/20/98 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
08/20/98 003269 CALLAHAM HARDWOOD FLOUR
08/20/98 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
08/20/98 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M
08/20/98 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M
08/20/98 CENTER FOR POLICE, THE
08/20/98 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
08/20/98 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
08/20/98 002782 CHICKmS SPORTING GOODS
08/20/98 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GO00S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PADRE BASEBALL GAME C#23-19659
CFD 88-12 DEBT SVS PMT: 9/1/98
JULY PMT CRC GYM COULING SYS
RET, W/H PMT, CRC COULING SYS,
CREDIT:PANELS NOT COMPLETE
REVERSE RETENTION
TEEN COUNCIL T-SHIRTS
SALES TAX
RES. IMPROV, PROGRAM:R,COSS
JUL DESIGN SVCS TEN,MUSEUM
RED CROSS AQUATICS SUPPLIES
TEMP HELP W/E 8/1/98 WILLIAMS
MBSHP:GREG LOREDO & MARK LEVIS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ELECTRICAL SERVICES TCC
REFUND: BEG. GOLF LESSONS
ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING
A,C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
RE-PAINT CITY SEAL ON CRC FLR
WELDING SERVS & SUPPLIES
CF:MISTAKE-FREE GRAMMER:CRISP
SEM:D.LANIER:RIVERSIDE:9/14/98
SPEC.EVENT MGMT CF:12/2 LABAHN
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
STREET SIGNS & MZSC HARDWARE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
FREIGHT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
190-183-999-5350 658,00 658,00
460-1040 1~008,945.74 lw008,945.74
210-190-152'5804 2,988.31
210-2035 298.83-
210-190-152-5804 2,039.66-
210-2035 203.96 853.78
190-180-999-5243 84.00
190-180-999-5243 6.51 90.51
165-199-813-5804 764.00 764.00
190-180-999-5248 29.40 29.40
190-183-999-5310 5.00 5.00
280-199-999-5118 277.35 277.35
001-164-601-5214 104.00 104.00
190~183-999-5330 160.00
190-183-999-5330 200.00 360.00
190-184'999-5212 185.50 185.50
190-183-4982 45.00 45.00
320-199-999-5261 1,380.00 1,380.00
001-164-601-5218 82.97
001-164-601-5218 82,97
001-164-601-5218 248.26 414.20
001-150-999-5250 42.00 42,00
190-182-999-5212 800,00 800.00
190-184-999-5301 10.10 10.10
280-199-999-5261 79.00
001-150-999-5261 79.00 158.00
001-170-999-5261 325.00 325.00
001-164-601-5244 181.02
001-164-601-5244 96.98 278.00
190-183'999-5380 680.00
190-183-999-5380 70.00
VOUCHRE2
08/19/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51054
51055
51056
51057
51057
51057
51057
51058
51059
51060
51061
51062
51063
51064
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51065
51066
51067
51068
51068
51068
51069
51070
15:32
CHECK
DATE
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS
C]SNEROSo CHERYL
CLARK, TRACEE
003252
003252
003252
003252
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC.
002697 CREATIVE LIGHTING~ INC.
002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT
001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC.
002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE
DOLPH, LEE ANN
DONNELLY, PAMELA
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S ] EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
003291 ED HILL CONSTRUCTION
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK HOSPITAL DIST
000478 FAST SIGNS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX
REFUND: SWIM CLASSES
REFUND: CREATIVE BEGINNINGS
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MAINT FAC
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CRC
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TCC
TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTIONS
LIGHT REPAIR CRC
002106 SUPPORT
2 WATER TANKS FOR EXPLORER PRG
JULY CONSULTING SERVICES
REFUND: DAY CAMP
REFUND: SWIM CLASSES
TEMP HELP P/E 7/31/98 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP P/E 7/31/98 WILLIANS
TEMP HELP P/E 7/31/98 MILES
TEMP HELP P/E 7/31/98 MILES
TEMP HELP PIE 7/31/98 MILES
TEMP HELP P/E 7/3/98 DEGANGE
TEMP HELP P/E 7/3/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP P/E 7/3/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP P/E 7/3/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP P/E 7/17/98 DEGANGE
TEMP HELP P/E 7/17/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP P/E 7/17/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP P/E 7/17/98 SERVEN
WATER SVCS 39656 DIEGO DR LDSC
CONST,INSPECTION SVCS MARG,PRK
LANDSCAPE SVCS FOR CITY SLOPES
LANDSCAPE SVCS FOR CITY SLOPES
LANDSCAPE SVCS FOR CITY SLOPES
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
PARKING BANNERS FOR OLD TOWN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5380
190-183-4975
190-183-4982
340-199-701-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-164-602-5406
190-180-999-5212
190-2140
001-171-999-5235
001-110-999-5248
190-183o4984
190-183-4975
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
001-161-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
193-180-999-5240
210-190-119-5804
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
190-2900
280-199-999-5362
ITEM
AMOUNT
52.70
65.00
30.00
31.51
31.57
31.57
31.57
4,335.00
550.00
82.50
159.60
4,000.00
135.00
27.00
551.76
551.76
176.16
176.16
352.32
2,935.53
415.63
831.26
415.63
2,779.20
289.54
579.08
289.54
814.79
330.00
92.89
36.08
56.15
100.00
258.60
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
802.70
65.00
30.00
126.22
4,335.00
550.00
82.50
159.60
4,000.00
135.00
27.00
10,343.57
814.79
330.00
185.12
100.00
258.60
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/98 15:]2 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51071 08/20/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-52]0
51071 08/20/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-52]0
18.25
93.50
111.75
51072 08/20/98 FLORES, GWYN REFUND: SWIM CLASSES 190-18]-4975
27.00
27.00
51073 08/20/98 FOOD 4 LESS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
51074 08/20/98 003249 FUELMAN OF CALIFORNIA FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
001-165-999-526]
14.50
14.50
51075 08/20/98 000540 G NEll COMPANIES MINIMUM WAGE POSTER 001-150-999-5222
51075 08/20/98 000540 G NEll COMPANIES COMPLETE COMPLIANCE KITS 001-150-999-5222
51075 08/20/98 000540 G NEIL COMPANIES SHIPPING 001-150-999-5222
9.99
5]9.94
22.62
572.55
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-5072 GENERAL USAGE ]20-199-999-5208
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-1941PTA CD TTACSD 320-199-999-5208
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-078] GENERAL USAGE ]20-199-999-5208
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-6243 PALA COMM. PARK ]20-199-999-5208
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-1370 CABOOSE 001-110-999-522]
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-2811 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
51076 08/20/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-8632 GENERAL USAGE ]20-1~-999-5208
3,387.14
57.72
70.07
28.85
103.02
1,544.04
29.47
5,220.31
51077 08/20/98 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. AUG ACCESS RVSD CO. OPEN LINE ]20-199-999-5208
51077 08/20/98 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. AUG ACCESS CRC OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208
]20.00
320.00
640.00
51078 08/20/98 001937 GALLS, INC. POLICE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 001-162-999-5242
51078 08/20/98 001937 GALLS, INC. SHIPPING CHARGES 001-162-999-5242
77.94
22.98
100.92
51079 08/20/98 GANGI, CARRIE
REFUND: DAY CAMP & T-SHIRT 190-183~4984
145.00
145.00
51080 08/20/98 002528 GLASS BLASTERS
CITY SEAL MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 001-150-999-5265
15.09
15.09
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK 001-120-999-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK 001-120-999-5277
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT: RETURNED ITEMS 001-120-999-5277
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT M1SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 001-140o999-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANNING 001-161o999-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANNING 001-161-~99-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES B&S 001-162-999-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES TCSD 190-180-999-5220
51081 08/20/98 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MlSC OFFICE SUPPLIES CRC 190-182-999-5220
600.]9
60.52
119.05-
302.61
1,000.00
410.32
93.52
194.45
177.70
2,720.46
51082 08/20/98 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
]20-199-999-5221
932.04
932°04
51083 08/20/98 GLOTFELTY, RHODA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
51083 08/20/98 GLOTFELTY, RHODA ADDtTL RENTAL HOURS 190-183-4990
100.00
25.00-
75. O0
51084 08/20/98 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5]]0
140.80
140.80
51085 08/20/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SPORTS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5380
51085 08/20/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PW 001-164-~01-5218
51085 08/20/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
52.72
60.95
177.33
VOUCHRE2
08/19/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51085
51085
51085
51085
51085
51085
51085
51085
51086
51087
51088
51088
51088
51089
51090
51090
51090
51090
51091
51092
51093
51094
51095
51096
51097
51098
51098
51099
51100
51101
51101
51101
51102
15:32
CHECK
DATE
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
001517
003327
003198
000194
000194
000194
000194
001407
000199
002140
000203
001091
002789
001123
001123
000380
000596
003323
003323
003323
VENDOR
NAME
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
HENZ, JACK
HOLY TABERNACLE CHURCH
HOLY TABERNACLE CHURCH
HOLY TABERNACLE CHURCH
HOME DEPOT
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C H A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C N A RETIREMENT TRUS
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
KANIGOWSKI, JERZY
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT
KINCO STAFFING SOLUTION
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
MAIN STREET PRINTING/PA
MAIN STREET PRINTING/PA
MAIN STREET PRINTING/PA
MCTAGUE, PAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCSD
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~RCSP
SALES TAX
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SR CTR
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCC
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
TRVL ADVANCE LEAGUE CF 8/26-28
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
FACILITY ROOM RENTAL
SHELVES FOR C.C. RECORDS VAULT
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF COHP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
CRC POOL SANITIZING SUPPLIES
000199 IRS GARN
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
RECRUITMENT ADS FOR H.R.
REFUND: PADRE BASEBALL GAHE
JUL O.T. SPEC.PLAN MRKT ASSESS
TEMP HELP W/E 8/09/98 BEDERIO
SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PW
SALES TAX
DAYCAMP EXCURSION 7/30/98
CF:RR/JC:LONG BEACH:10/2-4/98
FACE LIFT LABELS FOR OLD TOWN
FACE LIFT LABELS FOR OLD TOWN
FACE LIFT LABELS FOR OLD TOWN
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS LEVEL6
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-150-999-5248
190-180-999-5258
190-2900
190-2900
190-183-4990
340-199-701-5212
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
190-182-999-5212
001-2140
320-1980
001-150-999-5254
190-183-4986
280-199-999-5248
001-110-999-5118
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601o5242
190-183-999-5340
001-100-999-5258
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
190-183-4975
ITEM
AMOUNT
102.04
45.87
504.35
499.50
38.71
12.68
117.32
32.84
376.30
200.00
90.00
10.00
9.00-
67.76
1,632.42
18.75
200.00
6.25
177.79
302.51
4,535.85
115.20
40.00
1,369.18
81.90
524.33
40.64
413.59
590.00
1,063.37
179.96
19,40
30.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,644.31
376.30
200.00
91.00
67.76
1,857.42
177.79
302.51
4,535.85
115.20
40.00
1,369.18
81.90
564.97
413.59
590.00
1,262.73
30.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/98 15:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51103 08/20/98
MEADOWVIEW PONTE,LLC REFUND: TR 21818 ADVANCED FEES 192-180-4390
157.50
157.50
51104 08/20/98 003329 MILLER, HENRY
TRAVEL ADVANCE:LEAGUE CF:8/26 190-180-999-5258
200.00
200.00
51105 08/20/98 001339
51105 08/20/98 001339
51105 08/20/98 001339
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, I
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, I
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, I
PAINT/MISC SUPPLIES FOR ROADS
PAINT/MISC SUPPLIES FOR ROADS
PAINT/NISC SUPPLIES FOR ROADS
001-16~-601-5218 2,459.40-
001-164-601-5218 298.60
001-164-601-5218 4,331.55
2,170.75
51106 08/20/98 002139
51106 08/20/98 002139
51106 08/20/98 002139
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
HELP WANTED AD:DEPUTY DIRECTOR
HELP WANTED AD:CQOE ENFORCEMEN
HELP WANTED AD:VIDEO PRODUCT]O
001-150-999-5254 113.82
001-150-999-5254 97.56
001-150-999-5254 70.46
281.84
51107 08/20/98 002105
51107 08/20/98 002105
51107 08/20/98 002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TiRE & SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT
001-163-999-5214 61.53
001-162-999-5214 163.98
001-164-601-5214 40.00
265.51
51108 08/20/98 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. ACM ORAL BOARD & PROF SVS
001-110-999-5248 4,828.15 4,828.15
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
51109 08/20/98 003021
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACiFiC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACiFiC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
001-165-999-5208
001-163-~99-5208
001-164-601-5208
001-164-604-5208
001-161-999-5208
280-1990
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS 320-199-999-5208
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS 190-180-999~5208
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS 001-140-999-5208
JUL 9-AUG 8 CELLULAR PHONE SVS 001-162-999-5208
PHONE EQUIPMENT FOR CITY USE 320-199o999-5242
198.03
257.78
64.76
63.78
92.76
328.00
112.74
173.80
116.02
76.39
139.84
414.00
75.48
676.80
727.31
3,517.49
51110 08/20/98 003218 PELA
51110 08/20/98 003218 PELA
51110 08/20/98 003218 PELA
REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLANS
PLAN CHECK AND INPECTION SERVS
PLAN CHECK AND INPECTION SERVS
001-161-999-5250
190-180-999-5248
191-180-999-5248
4,510.00
735.12
614.88
5,860.00
51111 08/20/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
001-2122
73.84
73.84
51112 08/20/98 000247 PESTMASTER
51112 08/20/98 000247 PESTMASTER
WEED TREATMENT AROUND CHANNELS 001-164-601-5401
WEED TREATMENT FOR CITY PROPER 001-164-601~5402
1,750.00
1,897.00
3,647,00
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
001-161-999-5230
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5258
001-164-602-5222
001-140-~99-5222
280-199-999-5260
001-150-999-5260
001-101-999-5280
32.00
43.46
13.87
7.01
19.40
9.00
35.50
11.67
VOUCHRE2
08/19/98 15:32
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
51113 08/20/98 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT
PETTY CASH REZHBURSEHENT
PETTY CASH REINBURSEHENT
PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT
001-164-604-5228
190-183-999-5340
190-184-999-5301
280-199-999-5362
190'180-999'5261
001-16~-604-5260
001-164-601-5260
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5261
165-199-799-5262
190-184-999-5301
190-183-999-5320
001-100-999-5260
001-120-999-5261
21.54
10.00
43.11
24.53
43.72
15.00
15.00
39.37
28.16
26.33
27.25
6,36
6.99
6.49
485.76
51115 08/20/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS
51115 08/20/98 000580 PHOTO ~K)RKS
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
190-180-999-5301
001-161-999-5220
24.94
14.32
39.26
51116 08/20/98 PLAIN, ERIC
REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS
190-183-4975
25.00
25.00
51117 08/20/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC.
51117 08/20/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC.
51117 08/20/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC.
51117 08/20/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC.
POLICE - VEHICLE DECAL
SALES TAX
TEHECULA- VEHICLE DECAL
SALES TAX
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
210.00
16.28
206.25
15.98
448.51
51118 08/20/98 000253 POSTMASTER
51118 08/20/98 000253 POSTMASTER
51118 08/20/98 000253 POSTMASTER
51118 08/20/98 000253 POSTMASTER
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS HAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS NAIL & POSTAL SERVS
001-120-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-163-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
26.45
34.50
21.50
10.75
93,20
51119 08/20/98 000254
51119 08/20/98 000254
51119 08/20/98 000254
51119 08/Z0/98 000254
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN
51120 08/20/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE: PH 309
PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-17CSD
PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-07
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0293
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-164-601-5238
16.00
38.25
34.75
15.50
94.20
104.50
94.20
51121 08/20/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
51121 08/20/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
51121 08/20/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
51121 08/20/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
SC-5001339-0 KL
SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN
SC-5001377-0 SR. VAN
SC-5003948-6 INFO SYSTEMS
001-100-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
39.68
27.59
30.30
45.62
143.19
51122 08/20/98 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC.
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
320-199-999-5221
69,99
69.99
51123 08/20/98
RAMADA LIMITED OLD TOWN HTL:SPEC EVENTS MGMT-LAW ENFOR 001-170-999-5261
87.30
87.30
51124 08/20/98 000947
51124 08/20/98 000947
51124 08/20/98 000947
51124 08/20/98 000947
51124 08/20/98 000947
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
BLUEPRINTS AND HISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND NISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND M[SC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
210-165-697-5804
280-199-824-5804
001-1280
210-165-601-5804
190-180-999-5250
197,83
178.60
139.02
29.02
4.84
549.31
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/98 15:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/ "
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-08-100015-0 AVEN DE MISSION 193-180-999-5240
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-17-80000-1 VIA EDUARDO 001-164-601-5250
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL STREET 280-199-807-5801
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
51125 08/20/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
482.19
83.66
52.17
1,995.92
282.18
2,756.53
5,652.65
51126 08/20/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-~99-5214
51126 08/20/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-163-9~9-5214
51126 08/20/98 O00907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-164-604-5214
51126 08/20/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 280-199-999-5250
51126 08/20/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 280-199-999-5262
51126 08/2O/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214
51126 08/20/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5263
51.00
33.22
10.00
5.00
17.00
102.00
51.95
270.17
51127 08/20/98 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET JULY 98 PROF LEGAL SERVS
001-130-999-5247
499,50
499.50
51128 08/20/98 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R REL WEED ABATEMENT LIEN
001-162-999-5440
10.00
10.00
51129 08/20/98 001624 ROBERTS, GENIE REIMB: CFD 98-1 CLOSE:7/28-29 001-2641
51130 08/20/98 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340
64.59
340,47
64.59
340.47
51131 08/20/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES- PARKS 190-180-999-5212
51131 08/20/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES -PARKS 190-180-999-5212
51131 08/20/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES -PARKS 190-180-999-5212
45.00
22.47
67.00
134.47
51132 08/20/98 002384 SECURE BUSINESS CONMUNI AUDIO/VIDEO MAINTENANCE
320-19~-999-5250
1,200.00
1,200.00
51133 08/20/98 001919 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CDBG REIMBURSEMENT FY 97/98 140-2030
51133 08/20/98 001919 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE REOUCTION FOR OISALLOWED REIMB 140-1270
1,001.19
79.15-
922.04
51134 08/20/98 SONJA, PATTI REFUND: SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975
25.00
25.00
51135 08/20/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CNTRL SVS:FIRE STATION 84 001-171-999-5212
288.00
288.00
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-1353 PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-830-2307 FRONT 190-199-999-5240
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3030 WINCH RD TCl 191-180-999-5319
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-3230-3139 WINCH RD TCl 191-180-999-5319
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-07-626-6063 RANCHO VISTA 193-180-999-5240
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6800 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5240
51136 08/20/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
1,397.80
57.85
138.20
155.20
7,922.91
32.26
41.45
4#754.19
14,499.86
51137 08/20/98 002361 SOUTHERN CALIF FPO'S
51137 08/20/98 002361 SOUTHERN CALIF FPO'S
NFPA 72 W/CA AHEND:DAVIDSON:11 001-171-999-5261
MEHBERSNIP RENEWAL:DAVIDSON,N. 001-171-999-5226
35.00
45.00
80.00
51138 08/20/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP 021 725 0775 4 SR. CENTER 190-181-999-5240
51138 08/20/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP 101 525 0950 0 TCC 190-184-999-5240
51138 08/20/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP 133 040 7373 0 MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5240
20.94
30.52
17.98
69.44
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/98 15:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51139 08/20/98 SOUTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.00
51140 08/20/98 000293 STADIUM PIZZA POTLUCK AND AWARDS PARTY 190-183-999-5340 72.00
72.00
51141 08/20/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT FOR PW 001-164-601-5218 244.75
51141 08/20/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS ICE PACKS FOR RECREATION CNTR 190-183-999-5305 134.39
51141 08/20/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS ICE PACKS FOR RECREATION CNTR 190-183-999-5380 134.39
51142 08/20/98 000574 SUPERTONER HP TONER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 955.74
513.53
955.74
51143 08/20/98 SZYMANSKI, HELEN REFUND: WELKS EXCURSION 190-183-4986 27.00
27.00
51144 08/20/98 000308 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT WITH TTA 001-111-999-5266 5,000,00
5,000.00
51145 08/20/98 003140 TEHECULA VALLEY TAEKI40N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 93.60
51145 08/20/98 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 160.00
253.60
51146 08/20/98 002769 TODD'S FENCING RESIDENTIAL IMPRVMNT:COSS,R. 165-199-813-5804 1,126.32
1,126.32
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 5,905.70
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 22.73
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 190-2080 1,199.37
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 192-2080 2.50
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 33.19
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 194-2080 108.33
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 22.73
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080 93,33
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 640.60
51147 08/20/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 158.33
8,186.81
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 817.38
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 24.16
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160.: 1,576.16
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 12.70
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 330-2160 24.00
51148 08/20/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 85.82
2,540.22
51149 08/20/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 147.00
51149 08/20/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 1.00
51149 08/20/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 24.50
51149 08/20/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 2.50
175.00
51150 08/20/98 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, FLOOR MATS RENTAL ~ CRC
190-180-999-5243 5.71 5.71
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SEAGATE 2,1 GIG HARD-DRIVE 320-199-999-5221 355.58
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS CD SPEEDWRITER 320-199-999-5242 485.00
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS BLANK CD MEDIA 320-199-999-5221 77.00
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 37.59
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 5.97
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 128.22
51151 08/20/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 115.29
1,204.65
VOUCNRE2
08/19/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51152
51152
51153
51154
51155
45:32
CHECK
DATE
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
08/20/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001342
001342
002109
000346
VENDOR
NAME
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WHITE CAP
YATES, GRANT
YOUNG, JENNIFER
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340o199-701-5212
BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5212
MAINT SUPPLIES - PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5218
REIMBURSE:EMPLOYEE RECOG EVENT 001-2175
REFUND:GROUP GOLF LESSONS 190-183-4982
ITEM
AMOUNT
55.49-
228.77
78.03
92.93
45.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
173.28
78.03
92.93
45.00
TOTAL CHECKS 1,130,354.92
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
15:33
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
260 CFD 88-12 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
AMOUNT
198,227.51
34,300.44
19,267.28
28.93
71.81
1,7'33.82
413.56
5~836.56
1,701.74
8,509.66
213.97
3,175.99
2,477.75
1~692.30
1,367.50
TOTAL 279,018.82
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
15:33
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NANE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51156
51157
51158
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
134852
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175 698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175698
175 698
175698
175698
175698
175698
51161
08121/98
08/25/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/26/98
08/27/98
000537
003091
000411
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
003335
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
CALLAWAY VINEYARD & WIN
RIVERSIDE CO. FLOOD CON
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
[NSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (]RS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTAT/O((IRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
1ST CHOICE CONTRACTING
POWER FOR O.T. FIELD OFFICE
CANVAS BAGS FOR NAKAYAMA CHOIR
TOPOGRAPHY MAP-APN#909-120-049
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444
000444 SDI
000444
000444 SD]
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDXCARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NED]CARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
RES IMPROV. PGRM:FAULKENBURY
280-199-999-5362
001-101-999-5280
001-163-999-5224
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
165-199-813-5804
252.00
316.87
29.00
44.48
1.61
105.05
.85
1.60
5.72
4,522.77
120.71
835.08
1.53
3.67
59.56
24.31
47.96
13.55
145.85
26.01
131.08
17,323.07
296.95
4,353.05
8.79
22.43
299.76
136.43
101.31
46.80
623.29
142.82
598.78
4,257.36
82.28
1,251.69
2.44
6.25
76.57
36.85
42.10
24.08
126.64
36.88
140.80
1,225.00
252.00
316.87
29.00
6,091.39
30,037.42
1,225.00
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51162
51163
51164
51165
51166
51167
51167
51167
51167
51167
51167
51167
51167
51168
51168
51168
51169
51170
51171
51171
51171
51172
51173
51174
51175
51176
51177
51178
51178
51179
51180
51181
15:33
CHECK
DATE
08/27/98
08/27/98
08127/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08127/98
08/27/98
08127198
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27198
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000724
002410
001700
003066
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
000101
000101
000101
003351
000622
000622
000622
003048
002998
003339
002878
002099
000901
001260
001260
001089
003356
003349
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
A & R CUSTOH SCREEN PRI TINY TOT OLYMPICS T-SHIRTS 190-183-999-5320
A ~OMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN AUG JANITORIAL SRVCS - PARKS 190-180-999-5250
A+ TEACHING MATERIALS SUPPLIES FOR DAY CAMP
190-183-999-5340
AFFIRMED HOUSING GROUP REFUND:PERFORMANCE DEPOSIT 165-2640
ALTERNATIVES TO DOHESTI CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99
001-101-999-5267
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR TCSD MAINTENANCE
ANERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.a SR.CTR.
FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.a CRC
FLR.MATS/TOI4EL RNTL.~ TCC
FLR.MATS/TOt,/EL RNTL.a CTY.HALL
FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.Ii4TNC.FAC.
SET UP FEE-ALL PARKS & FACS.
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR PW MAINT CRE~
190-180-999-5243
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-180-999-5243
001-164-601-5243
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE~ INC.
APPLE ONE, INC,
TEMP HELP W/E 7/4 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 7/18 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 8/8 WILLIAMS
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5118
ART ATTACK GRAPHIC DESI REFUND:COED SOFTBALL LEAGUE 190-183-4994
ATTRACTION BALLOONS BALLOON DEPOSIT FOR O.T. PRONO 280-199-999-5362
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
ELECTRICAL SERVICES" PARKS
ELECTRICAL SERVICES ° TCC
ELECTRICAL SERVICES-CITY HALL
190-180-999o5212
190-184-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TE CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99
001-101-999-5267
BRUNSWICK CAL OAKS BO~L DAY CAMP EXCURSION 8/20
190-183-999-5340
BUG TECH EXTERMINATORS, PEST CONTROL SERVICES
001-162-999-5440
BUSINESS INFORMATION SY ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING 8/10 320-199-999-5261
BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES AUG O.T. RESTROOM RENTAL
280-199-999-5212
CPRS
MTG:8/28 J.HUTER & J.LAWRENCE 190-180-999-5260
CPRS
CPRS
MEMBERSHIP DUES I.ROGERS 98/99 190-180-999-5226
MEMBERSHIP DUES J.PELLETIER 98 190-180-999-5226
CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVES DEBT CF:G.ROBERTS 10/29-30 001-140-999-5261
CALIFORNIA SENIOR LEGIS 1/2 PAGE AD IN PUBLICATION 001-110-999-5228
CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG TROLLEY SERVICE FOR OLD TO~N 280-199o999-5362
ITEM
AMOUNT
343.72
1,933.00
116.51
31,500.00
9,000.00
35.58
27.72
57.12
38.52
62.55
25.65
80.00
69.51
107.10
63.00
277.35
375.00
250.00
45.00
45.00
117.00
22,400.00
105.00
125.00
600.00
826.00
110.00
110.00
115.00
150.00
100.00
540.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
343.72
1,933.00
116.51
31,500.00
9,000,00
396.65
447,45
375.00
250.00
207.00
22,400.00
I05.00
125.00
600,00
826.00
110.00
225.00
150.00
100.00
540.00
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51182
51183
51184
51184
5118~
51184
51184
51185
51186
51187
51188
51188
51188
51188
51188
51188
51189
51190
51191
51191
51192
51193
51193
51193
51193
51193
51193
51193
51194
51194
51195
51195
51196
51197
51198
15:33
CHECK
DATE
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
G8/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003298
001193
003252
003252
003252
003252
003252
002631
001393
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
003291
002438
001056
001056
000478
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000170
000170
000184
000184
003336
000173
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CLASSIC CARRIAGES
TROLLEY SERVICES IN OLD TOWN
CONP USA° INC.
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-TCC
JANiTORZAL SUPPLIES-CRC
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-MAINT. FAC
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-SENIOR CTR
COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. JUL TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTIONS
CUNARD, STEPHANIE
REFUND:WIGGLE WORM CLASSES
DATA TICKET, INC.
PARKING CITATION PROCESSING
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
TEMP HELP P/E 8/14 WILLIANS
TEMP HELP P/E 8/14 WZLLIAMS
TEMP HELP P/E 8/14 YONKER
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 8/14 SERVEN
TENP HELP C2)W/E 8/14 SERVEN
TENP HELP (2)W/E 8/14 SERVEN
ED HILL CONSTRUCTION CONST INSPECTION SRVCS-HARG PK
ENGEN CORPORATION
JUL PROF ENG SRVCS-WINCH. PARK
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
LDSC IMPROV/REPAIRS C.MEDUSA
LDSC IMPROV/REPAIRS NARGARITA
FAST SIGNS
SIGNS FOR OLD TOWN PROMOTION
FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC,
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, ZNC,
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, ]NC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC.
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, CREDIT:RETURNED iTEMS
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4354 AUG PALA CONM PRK
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-695-3564 AUG CITY ALARM
GAITAN, TANYA
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS
GARAGE DOUR SERVICE CON RES IMPROV. PRGM:FAULKENBURY
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA HISC BINDING SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-999-5362
320-199-999-5221
340-199-701-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-181-999-5212
001-164-602-5406
190-183-4980
001-2030
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
210-190-119-5804
210-190-149-5802
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-120-999-5277
330-199-999-5230
001-120-999-5277
001-140-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-183-4975
165-199-813-5804
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
400.00
644.48
96.98
20.74
62.23
20.74
24.24
7,686.00
4.17
237.00
522.72
522.72
1,215.60
345.58
691.16
345.58
4,654.50
135.00
85.18
75.68
120.65
53,00
21.50
13.75
17.50
43,00
10.75
13.50
80.54
32,54-
31.65
56.00
25.00
625.00
42.88
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
400.00
644.48
224.93
7,686.00
4.17
237.00
3,643.36
4,654.50
135.00
160.86
120.65
1~.00
48.00
87.65
25.00
625.00
VOUCHRE2
08/26198
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51198
51198
51198
51198
51198
51198
51198
51199
51199
51200
51200
51200
51201
51202
51203
51204
51204
51204
51205
51206
51207
51208
51208
51208
51208
51209
51209
51210
51210
51211
51212
51213
51214
51214
51214
15:33
CHECK
DATE
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000173
000173
00017'5
000173
000173
000173
000173
002528
002528
000177
000177
000177
000178
001609
003342
002098
002098
002098
001407
002695
003223
000206
000206
000206
000206
001534
001534
003286
002229
001967
003163
003163
003163
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA MISC BINDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA MISC BINDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA MISC BINDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA MISC BINDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA MISC BINDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA FREIGHT
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA SALES TAX
GLASS BLASTERS
GLASS BLASTERS
CITY SEAL MUGS FOR NEW HIRES
CITY SEAL MUGS FOR NEW HIRES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
SALES TAX
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO MISC COHPUTER SUPPLIES
GREATER ALARM COMPANY, JUL-SEP ALARM SRVCS-CABOOSE
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE
CREDIT:OVERPAYMENT OF INVOICE
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN AUG PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, ZN PROF,SVCS:PALA ROAD BRIDGE
KINKO'S~ INC.
KINKOrS, INC.
KINKO~S, INC.
KINKO'S, INC.
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
KRAVIS, YUKO
KRAVIS, YUKO
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS
LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:6 SIGMA C.M. STAFF 10/6
LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:6 SIGMA C.M. STAFF 10/6
LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI JUL TEM VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR
LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I JUL PRESS CLIPPING SERVICES
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 7/26 HERNANDEZ
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM
TONER FOR CASHIER'S COPIER
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-150-999-5265
001-150-999-5265
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5220
320-199-999-5221
001-110-999-5223
001-101-999-5267
001-2030
001-2030!'
001-2030
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5248
210-165-631-5801
190-180-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
190-183-999-5310
190-180-999o5Z20
190-183-4975
190-183-4975
001-150-999-5258
001-110-999o5258
001-101-999-5285
001-111-999-5270
330-1~-999-5118
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
8.08
14.28
11.72
19.62
22.70
14.15
10.34
15.09
15,09
179.00
13.87
59.28
116.37
76.13
6,805.00
12.50
161.96
23.39-
241.36
200.20
1,047.06
29.31
174.02
81.69
47.03
25.00
25.00
132.00
396.00
1,182.31
295.02
82.56
37.00
8.~
2.87
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
143.77
30.18
252.15
116.37
76.13
6,805.00
151.07
241.36
200.20
1,047.06
332.05
50.00
528.00
1,182.31
295.02
82.56
48.75
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/26/98 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51215 08/27/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 90.55
51215 08/27/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 13.15
103.70
51216 08/27/98 MOLDING INTERNATIONAL & REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.O0
51217 08/27/98 MONTANTE, GERALD AND ME REIMBURSEMENT DRIVEWAY REPAIRS 001-164-601-5401 9,400.00
9,400.00
51218 08/27/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES WORK RELATED SPECIAL TAX BOND 460-2030 1,367.50
51218 08/27/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES COMM FAC.DISTRICT ADMIN.FEE 260-2030 1,701.74
51219 08/27/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM PRINTING SERVICES 001-140-~99-5222 1,141.29
51219 08/27/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 10.86
51219 08/27/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 88.45
3,069.24
1,240.60
51220 08/27/98 002037 NEXUS INTEGRATED SOLUTI MISC REPAIR & MAINT OF EQUIP 320-199-999-5215
80.00
80.00
51221 08/27/98 002105 OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214 86.51
51221 08/27/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 60.19
51221 08/27/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CiTY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-161-999-5214 69.47
216.17
51222 08/27/98 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER TYPEWRITER REPAIR - FINANCE 001-140-999-5250
65.00
65.00
51223 08/27/98 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES AUG DUCK POND MAINTENANCE
190-180-999o5212 800.00 800.00
51224 08/27/98 002344 OSVOLD, HEIDA REIMB:TECH SEM/MATERIALS 8/5 001-161-999-5261 123,15
123.15
51225 08/27/98 003346 PARENT CENTER CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99 001-101-999-5267 4,050.00
4,050.00
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 001-2130 322.43
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 22,717.24
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 447.72
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 3,445.70
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.31
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 33.70
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 405.06
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390? 206.70
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 219.80
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 129.08
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 690.59
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 131.12
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 485.58
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 263.61
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130 2.81
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130 5.62
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130 39.33
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130 8.43
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 79.15
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.17
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 12.94
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .05
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .14
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/26/98 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.52
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .8/+
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .69
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 1.86
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93
51226 08/27/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.18
29,669.76
51228 08/27/98 003362 PHAROAH'S LOST KINGDOM DAY CAMP EXCURSION 9/10 190-183-999-5340 622.85
622.85
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. CITY SEAL LABEL SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5214 237.38
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. CITY SEAL LABEL SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5214 356.06
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. CITY SEAL LABEL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5214 356.06
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. SALES TAX 001-162-999-5214 18.40
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. SALES TAX 001-164-604-5214 27.60
51229 08/27/98 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. SALES TAX 190-180-999-5214 27.59
1,023.09
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0305 001-161-999-5256 18.50
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0234 001-161-999-5256 17.00
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0270 001-161-999-5256 18.00
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:98-13 001-120-999-5256 9.50
51230 08/Z7/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:98-14 001-120-999-5256 20.25
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:98-15 001-120j~99-5256 9.50
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0297 001-161-999-5256 16.75
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0242 001-161-999-5256 17.25
51230 08/27/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0338 001-161-999-5256 18.25
145,00
51231 08/27/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SVCS:MARGARITA RD LDSC 190-180-999-5240 207.06
207.06
51232 08/27/98 003343 RAPE CRISIS CENTER CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99
001-101-999-5267 5,000.00 5,000.00
51233 08/27/98 002907 REINHART-FONTES ASSOC., CONM.PROPERTY APPRAISAL:O.T. 280-199-999-5250 2,200.00
2,200.00
51234 08/27/98 000266 RIGHTWAY SEPT PORTABLE TOILET-RIVERTON 190-180-999-5238 62.89
62.89
51235 08/27/98 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME HEALTH PERMIT:PALA CONM. PARK 190-180-999-5250
65.00
65.00
51236 08/27/98 000955 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B SUMMER NIGHTS BIKE PATROL/JULY 001-170-999-5326 3,068.25
3,068.25
51237 08/27/98 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 46.84
46.84
51238 08/27/98 002743
51238 08/27/98 002743
51238 08/27/98 002743
51238 08/27/98 002743
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
51239 08/27/98 001053 SAN DIEGO ICE ARENA
LOCKSMITH MATERIALS FOR CRC
LABOR FOR SERVICES AT CRC
SALES TAX
LOCKSMITH SERVICES AT CRC
DAYCAMP EXCURSION 8/27
51240 08/27/98 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
190-182-999-5250 438.99
190-182-999-5250 178.00
190-182-999-5250 34.02
190-180-999-5212 419.60
190-183-999-5340 275.00
190-183-999-5340 94.54
1,070.61
275.00
94.54
51241 08/27/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP 091'024'9300'5 CRC 190'182-999-5240 145.89 145.89
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
51242
51243
51244
51245
51246
51247
51248
51249
51250
51251
51252
51253
51254
51255
51255
51255
51256
51257
51257
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
51258
15:33
CHECK
DATE
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/Z7/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
08/27/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003363
002150
000825
001672
000515
003140
002111
001483
003341
003345
002566
001342
001342
001342
002092
002092
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOgCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
SPORTS ADVANTAGE
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER
TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
TOGO~ S
TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT FOR SKATE PARK
MISC SAFETY EQUIPMENT
REPAIRS ON POLICE MOTORCYCLES
PLUMBING MAINT/REPAIR-TES
PRONOTIONS/GIFTS SISTER CITIES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFRESHMENTS-O.T. ASSEMBLY MTG
MITIGATION MONITOR:REGIONAL CT
TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO CDBG/CS FUNDING 98/99
VALENTINE MOTORS
REPLACE FENCE POST-O.T.STSCAPE
VALLEY INTERVENTION PRO CDBG/CS FUNDIND 98/99
VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
WATKINS, LINDA
REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY~
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLYm
MAINT.SUPPLIES-VARIOUS PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTR PARTIAL REFUND OF DEPOSIT
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
CITY/EDC MARKETING BROCHURES
CITY/EDC MARKETING BROCHURES
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION B]LLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BZLLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
COLOR COPIER DEVELOPER
TONER WASTE CONTAINER
FUSER OIL
BLACK TONER
COLOR TONER
STAPLE CARTRIDGES
STAPLE CARTRIDGES(INTERNAL)
STAPLE CARTRIDGES(EXTERNAL)
SALES TAX
PYRAMID STAPLES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5305
001-164-601-5218
001-170-999-5214
190-180-999-5212
001-101-999-5280
190 - 183 - 999 - 5330
280 - 199 - 999 - 5362
001-2620
001 - 101-999-5267
280 - 199- 999 - 5362
001 - 101-999- 5267
320-199-999-5221
190 - 183 - 4982
190-180-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
O01 - 2670
280 - 199 ' 999 - 5270
001 ' 111-999-5270
330-199~99-5220
330 - 199- 999- 5220
330-199 - 999- 5220
330 - 199 - 999 - 5 Z20
330 - 199- 999 - 5220
330' 199-999-5220
330 - 199 - 999 - 5220
330 - 199 ' 999 ' 5220
330 - 199 - 999 - 5220
330 - 199- 999- 5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
397.60
126.27
315.27
67.00
259.68
40.00
139.86
58.75
6,000.00
277.99
1,768.00
59.26
80.00
190.72
5.24
58.51
63,232.00
2,600.00
345.88
408.00
22.00
154.00
202.00
504.00
137.00
150.00
105.00
130.36
86.20
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
397.60
126.27
315.27
67.00
259.68
40.00
139.86
58.75
6,000.00
Z77.99
1,768.00
59.26
80.00
254.47
63,232.00
2,945.88
1,898.56
TOTAL CHECKS 279,018.82
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
15:44
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
28,015.83
9,969.00
78~725.40
116,710.Z3
VOUCHRE2
08/26/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
51261
51261
51262
51263
51264
51265
51266
15:44
CHECK
DATE
09/08/98
09/08/98
09/08/98
09/08/98
09/08/98
09/08/98
09/08/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003216
003216
003269
000164
001706
002187
000843
VENDOR
NAME
1ST MECHANICAL, INC
1ST MECHANICAL, INC
CALLAHAN HARDi,/OOD FLOOR
ESGIL CORPORATION
GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS,
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR
MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JULY PMT CRC COOLING SYSTEM
RET. W/H PMT CRC COOLING SYS.
REFINISH GYM FLOOR AT THE CRC
JULY PLAN CHECK SERVICES
CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING
JULY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
PROF ENG SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-152-5804
210-2035
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5248
001-164-601-5402
001-172-999-5255
210-165-631-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
68,514.29
6,851.43-
9,969.00
5,753.43
16,988.15
5,274.25
17,062.54
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
61,662.86
9,969.00
5,753.43
16,988.15
5,274.25
17,062.54
TOTAL CHECKS 116,710.23
ITEM 4
TO-'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
September 8, 1998
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1998
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director'/~''''
Jesse Diaz, Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of
July 31, 1998.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government
Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of July 31, 1998.
The cash balance reported at July 1, 1998 is $5, 196,985 higher than the balance reported on
the June 30, 1998 Treasurer's Report. This is due to the inclusion of the proceeds of the
Measure "A" loan (plus interest earnings through June 30) that were not included in the June
30, 1998 Treasurer's Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1998
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of July 31, 1998
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of July 31, 1998
City of Temecula
City Treasurer*s Report
As of July 31, 1998
Cash Activity for the Month of July
Cash and Investments as of]uly 1, 1998
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of July 31, 1998
67,224,604 (1)
4,637,203
(8,887,400)
62,974,407
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/ Contra0tuaF
Termination Market
Type of Investment Institution Yield Date Value
Petty Cash City Hall n/a $ 1,500
General Checking Union Bank n/a (1,361,154)
Sweep Account Union Bank 4.548 % 794,820
(Money Market Account) (Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Benefit Demand Dcposits Union Bank n/a 7,041
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.652 % 40,759,701
Checking Accounts Home Savings of America N/A 10,549
(Sherwood/Pujol Apartments)
Checking Account Community Bank unavailable 141,778
(Retention Escrow)
Cheoldng Account Grossmont Bank 4,950 % 19,693
(Retention Escrow)
Checking A~count Union Bank n/a 5,410
(Parking Citations)
Deferred Compensation Fund ICMA n/a 458,627
Deferred Compensation Fund PEBSCO n/a 880,459
Defined Contribution Fund PEBSCO n/a 92,198
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U,S. Bank flint Am. Govt) 5.080 % 3,632,529
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- Winchester 98-1 U.S. Bank (Fint Am. Treasury) 4.968 % 1,032,785
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts - Measure A U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.968 % 5,218,224
(triohey Market Account)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.968 % 17,791
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 502,690
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.968 % 7,779,377
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920
(Investment Agreement)
(1)-This mount represents a $ 5,196,985 increase from the balance reported at Jane 30, 1998 to reflect
the balance of Measure "A" loan proceeds.
(2)-This mount is net of outstanding checks.
(3)-At July 31, 1998 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $31,818,110,508.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $41,155,070.
Par/Book
Balance
$ 1,500
(1,361,154) (2)
794,820
7,041 (2)
40,759,701 (3)
10,549 (2)
141,778
19,693
5,410
458,627
880,459
92,198
3,632,529
1,531,469
1,032,785
5,218,224
17,791
502,690
7,779,377
1,448,920
All investments are liquid and 0urrently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temeeula for the next sLx months.
$ 62,974,407
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of July31, 1998
city (1)
Assgts:
Cash and investments $ 39,061,724
Receivables 4,944, 107
Due from other funds 993,992
Land kid for resale
Prepaid assets 90,709
D~posits 659,539
Fixed assets-net 920,702
Totalassets $ 46,670,773
Community
Services
District
$ 2,355,020
470,322
$ 2,825,342
Rcdevelopment
Agency
14,280,556
1,172,759
476,522
2,103,053
$ 18,032,890
Community
Facilities
Districts (2)
7,277,107
1,124,300
8,401,407
Toul
62,974,407
6,587,188
1,470,514
2,103,053
90,709
1,783,839
920,702
75,930,412
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 822,884
Other liabilities 6,983,552
Total liabilities 7,806,436
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,281,781
Retained earnings 880, 195
Fund balances:
Reserved (3) 10,220,653
Designated (3) 23,853,803
Undesignated 2,627,905
Total fund equity 38,864,337
Total liabilities and fund equity
212,417
212,417
854,300
1,758,625
2,612,925
46,670,773 $ 2,825,342 $
476,522
1,094,723
1,571,245
11,083,987
5,377,658
16,461,645
18,032,890
171,108
4,138,492
4,309,600
1,124,300
2,967,507
4,091,807
8,401,407
1,470,514
12,429,184
13,899,698
1,281,781
880,195
23,283,240
33,957,593
2,627,905
62,030,714
75,930,412
(1) Includes General Fund, C1P Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills).
(3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages.
ITEM 5
Y APPROVA~
CIT ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City ManagedCity Council
FROM: ~ .. oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: ~eptember 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Agreement
PREPARED BY: ~;) All Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Terminate the existing agreement with the County of Riverside dated June 26, 1990.
2. Approve the attached agreement with the County of Riverside for maintenance of traffic
signals and safety lighting and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND: The attached agreement between the City and the County of Riverside is for
maintenance of traffic signals and safety lighting. The agreement covers maintenance work on
traffic signals and safety lighting installations located within the City of Temecula and the street lights
in the Old Town area. A list of locations is provided with the agreement.
The agreement provides for the County to bill the City on a time and materials basis on a quadedy
basis. Either party upon thirty (30) days wdtten notice may terminate the agreement.
Upon approval by the City Council the County of Riverside will finalize the agreement and forward
copies to the City for signatures
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Fiscal Year 1998~99 Budget
Account No. 001-164-602-5405.
ATTACHMENT: Agreement for Maintenance of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting
-1 - r:\agdrpt\98\O9OB\signalmaintagree
AGREEMENT FOR
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AND SAFETY LIGHTING
This AGREEMENT is between the County of Riverside, referred to herein as
COUNTY, and the City of Temecula, referred to herein as CITY:
This AGREEMENT is for maintenance work provided by the County
Transportation Department on traffic signal and highway safety lighting installations
located wholly within the CITY as shown on the attached Appendix.
IT IS AGREED:
1. COUNTY, through its Transportation and Land Management Agency,
Transportation Department, will provide repairs, routine maintenance work
and emergency call-out service on traffic signals, highway safety lighting,
flashing beacons, and other electrically operated traffic control or warning
devices at the location(s) described in the attached Appendix. In providing
said maintenance, the COUNTY shall do the following: Inspect the signal
system and clean the control cabinet every six weeks; re-lamp and clean
signal heads every three years; re-lamp and clean street lights every five
years.
2. CITY shall pay COUNTY for the cost of routine maintenance, repairs and
emergency service, including all COUNTY costs for wages, benefits,
transportation, materials and administrative accounting for all CITY location
installations serviced by COUNTY.
3. Records for the work provided under this Agreement shall be kept by the
COUNTY and shall include the cost of all services performed. Billing for the
cost to CITY shall be made quarterly and shall include an annual itemized
accounting of all costs and services.
The CITY shall submit in writing any dispute in billing within thirty (30)
working days after receipt of such billing. Otherwise, CITY shall pay for
services within thirty (30) days after receipt of billing from COUNTY.
This agreement shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date this
Agreement is approved by resolution by the COUNTY Board of Supervisors.
The COUNTY will provide the CITY notice of the official Board action no later
than two weeks before the effective date. The Agreement shall remain in
force until terminated by either party by thirty (30) days written notice to the
other party.
If the COUNTY is of the opinion that any work COUNTY has been directed
to perform is beyond the scope of this Agreement and constitutes Extra
Work, the COUNTY shall promptly notify the CITY of that opinion. The
COUNTY shall be the sole judge as to whether or not such work is in fact
beyond the scope of this Agreement and constitutes Extra Work. However,
for purposes of COUNTY proceeding to perform same, this is not intended to
deny CITY its civil legal remedies in the event of a dispute. In the event that
the CITY determines that such work does constitute Extra Work, it shall
provide extra compensation to the COUNTY upon a fair and equitable basis
in accordance with the COUNTY's standard rate.
Upon and subject to further agreement of the parties acknowledged in writing
by COUNTY's Director of Transportation, and CITY's Director of Public
Works, facilities of like nature may be added hereto or deleted herefrom
without further review by either the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY or the
City Council of CITY.
The CITY and COUNTY covenant and agree that, except as otherwise
expressly set forth herein, COUNTY makes no representation or warranty of
whatsoever kind, nature or sort, either express or implied, concerning the
goods and services to be furnished hereunder, AND COUNTY DOES HEREBY
DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING SPECIFICALLY
ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE CONCERNING ANY SUCH GOODS OR SERVICES.
The CITY shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the COUNTY, its
officers, agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liability,
claims, demands, debts, damages, suits, actions and causes of action of
whatsoever kind, nature or sort, including, but not by way of limitation,
wrongful death, personal injury or damage to property, the expenses of the
defense of said parties and the payment of attorneys' fees in any such claim
or action, arising out of or in any manner connected with activities of the
CITY or CITY employees.
The COUNTY shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless, the CITY, its
officers, agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liability,
claims, demands, debts, damages, suits, actions and causes of action of
whatsoever kind, nature, or sort, including, but not by way of limitation,
wrongful death, personal injury or damage to property, the expenses of the
defense of said parties and the payment of attorneys' fees in any such claim
or action, arising out of or in any manner connected with services in the
furnishing of goods and material by the COUNTY hereunder.
10. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to
the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations,
understandings or agreements pertaining to the locations stipulated in the
attached Appendix.
/////
/////
/////
11.
Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be sent to each party shall be
sent by regular mail, addressed as follows:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND
MANAGEMENT AGENCY
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: City Manager
Attention:
David E. Barnhart,
Director of Transportation
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on
,19__.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF
By: By:
Chairman, Mayor
Board of Supervisors
Attest: Gerald A. Maloney,
Clerk of the Board
Attest:
By:
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
By:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
By:
William Katzenstein,
County Counsel
By:
City Attorney's Office
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
David E. Barnhart,
Director of Transportation
BY:
City Engineer
WEM:DC
APPENDIX
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTING INSTALLATIONS
THAT ARE WHOLLY-OWNED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA
MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
May 1988
SG# LT#
7825 8925
7848 8948
7702 8810
7799 8806
8808
7797 8804
7707 8823
7700 8807
7807 8907
7846 8946
7703 8811
7704 8812
7705 8817
7847 8947
7706 8821
7701 8809
7733 8842
7724 8830
TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION
Avenida Barca & Margarita Road
Cosmic Drive & Rancho California Road
Del Rio Road & Front Street
Diaz Road & Rancho California Road
Front Street & Main Street - System
Front Street & Rancho California Road
Front Street & Via Montezuma
Jefferson Street & Winchester Road
La Serena Way & Margarita Road
Lyndie Lane & Rancho California Road
Margarita Road & Moraga Road
Margarita Road & Rancho California Road
Margarita Road & Rancho Vista Road
Margarita Road & Rustic Glen Drive
Mira Loma Drive (East) & Rancho Vista Road
Moraga Road & Rancho California Road
Motor Car Parkway & Ynez Road
Palm Plaza Entrance & Ynez Road
SG#
7709
7735
7798
7708
7710
7715
7808
7809
LT#
8825
8843
8805
8824
8826
8827
8908
8909
TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION
Pauba Road & Ynez Road
Rancho California Road & Towne Center
Rancho California Road & Ynez Road
Rancho Vista Road & Ynez Road
Santiago Road & Ynez Road
Solona Way & Ynez Road
Towne Center/Tower Plaza & Ynez Road - North
Towne Center/Tower Plaza & Ynez Road - South
WEM:DC:nlw
May 1998
apndxtem.wpd
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
J~L~seph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
eptember 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Accept Substitute Securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Materials purposes in Parcel Map No. 24085-3 (Located Northwesterly of the
Intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Ddve - Avenida de Ventas)
PREPARED ~Albert K. 'Crisp, ~ermit Engineer
BY' Ronald J Parks Deputy Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
ACCEPT substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Purposes Parcel Map 24085-3
2. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Securities on file with the City Clerk.
AUTHORIZE release of the cash deposits which secured Faithful Performance and Labor
and Materials.
4. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On December 16, 1997, the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 24085-3
and entered into subdivision improvement agreement with:
Westside City 1 LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
for the improvement of streets and drainage, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the
agreement were cash deposits as follows:
In the amount of $99,567 for Faithful Performance for street and drainage
improvements.
In the amount of $64,438 for Labor and Materials for street and drainage improvements.
In the amount of $3,000 for subdivision monumentation.
On August 11, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized reduction in the Faithful Performance security to the ten-percent
(10%) warranty amount as follows:
-1- r:\agdrpt\98\O81 l\pm240853.acc
In the amount of $36,335 for Faithful Performance Warranty for street and drainage
improvements.
The Labor and Materials secudty is retained for the contractual six-month lien pedod to assure
payment for labor and materials claims.
In the amount of $64,438 for Labor and Materials for street and drainage improvements.
The Developer has submitted Letters of Credit posted by Temecula Valley Bank in
substitution for the cash deposits retained for Faithful Perfomanca Warranty and Labor and Materials
purposes as follows:
Letter of Credit No. 00010 for Faithful Performance Warranty in the amount of $36,335
Letter of Credit No. 00011 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $64,438
The subdivision monumentation will be reviewed and approved by Public Works Staff and
recommended for release of security when appropriate.
The streets within this phase of development were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by Resolution No. 98-80 on August 11, 1998. The streets accepted are portions of Remington
Avenue and Diaz Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
1. Location Map
2.
Norle.
Substitute Securities (On file)
-2- r:\agdrpt\98\O811 \pm240853.acc
4ilia, pARCEL 2
P.M, 8/1'6
Parcel Map No. 24085-3
· ,ocation .Man
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 7
APPROVA~,~~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER _
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM: ~,
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Accept Substitute Agreement and Securities in Tract No. 23143-1
(Southeasterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
PREPARED BY:~Ronald J. Parks. Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities in Tract No. 23143-
1
2. AUTHORIZE an eighteen (18) month extension of time.
3. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, Traffic Signal Mitigation,
Erosion Control, and Subdivision Monumentation Securities on file.
4. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developers and sureties.
BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1992, the City Council, approved Tract Map No. 23143-1
and entered into subdivision improvements agreement with:
Taylor Woodrow Homes
for the improvement of streets, drainage, and sewer and water systems, installation of subdivision
monumentation, and payment of traffic signal mitigation fees. Bonds were posted by The American
Insurance Company in the following amounts:
1. Bond No. 111 4143 9437 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $1,409,000 ($1,024,000,
$193,500, and $191,500 respectively), for street, drainage, and water and sewer improvements.
2. Bond No. 111 4143 9437 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $704,500 ($512,000, $96,750,
and $95,750 respectively), for street, drainage, and water and sewer improvements.
3. Bond No. 111 4143 9429 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $38,148.
4. Bond No. 111 4143 9445 for Traffic Signal Mitigation in the amount of $12,150.
At a later date, the subdivider also posted security assudng Erosion Control measures for the overall
grading site as follows:
R: L4GDRP~,~810908i TR23143-1. SUB. DOC
Bond No. 111 4157 5156 00 for Erosion Control in the amount of $141,000.
The developer. Taylor Woodrow Homes, had eadier initiated work on sixteen other tracts in the City
which were impacted by the prolonged housing slump. Through several partnership arrangements
and subsequent sale of several tracts to other merchant-builders, Taylor Woodrow Homes was able
to develop or facilitate development on all sixteen previously recorded tracts. Start of construction
on the subject development, Tract No. 23143-1, was also impacted by several proposed projects
under Assessment District No. 159, including "Crowne Hill Drive" and related grading, which did not
proceed. The developer then elected to sell the property rather than proceed.
The purchaser of this site, Crowne Meadows, L.L.P., a Washington Limited partnership, has
submitted substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and securities posted by American
Motorists Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 3SM 914 511 00 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $1,409,000.
2. Bond No. 3SM 914 511 00 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $704,500.
3. Bond No. 3SM 914 509 00 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $38,148.
4. Bond No. 3SM 914 505 00 for Traffic Signal Mitigation in the amount of $12,150
5. Bond No. 3SM 914 510 00 for Erosion Control in the amount of $141,000.
With acceptance of the substitute securities the following parent developer bonds as posted by The
American Insurance Company are also recommended for release:
Bond No. 111 4143 9437 00 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $1,409,000.
Bond No. 111 4143 9437 00 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $704,500.
Bond No. 111 4143 9429 00 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $38,148.
Bond No. 111 4143 9445 00 for Traffic Signal Mitigation in the amount of $12,150.
Bond No. 111 4157 5156 00 for Erosion Control in the amount of $141,000.
The new developer requests an eighteen month construction period, consistent with the contractual
provisions, in order to complete the remaining work. The new contractual completion date would be
March 8, 2000.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities (on File)
R:tAGDRP7"},~BtOgO8t TR23143- I. SUB. DOC
, SITE
VICINITY
41
,0 835;63.4~.4 'E. pLaCE
r¥.,
N~Se34 04'E
Tract No. 23 143-1
Location
Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE.
ITEM 8
APPROVALC~
City ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1998
Release Labor and Materials security for Public Improvements in Parcel Map
No. 27987-1 (located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway
and Country Glen Way)
PREPARED BY: ~.K Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
~ Albert K. Cdsp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Labor and Materials security for the Public Improvements
in Parcel Map No. 27987-1.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On April 23, 1995, the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 27987-1 and
entered into subdivision improvement agreement with:
Vail Ranch Limited Partnership,
for the improvement of streets and drainage, and installation of water and sewer systems.
Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by National Casualty Insurance
Company as follows:
1. Bond No. VRLP-CA-19644780 in the total amount of $636,000 ($220,500, $304,500, and
$111,000 respectively) for street and drainage, water, and sewer improvements for faithful
performance.
2. Bond No. VRLP~CA-19644780 in the total amount of $318,000 ($110,250, $152,250, and
$55,500, respectively) for street and drainage, and water, and sewer improvements for labor and
materials.
On December 16, 1997, the City Council accepted the public improvements, reduction in Faithful
Performance security amount to the ten-percent (10%) warranty level, and initiation of the one-year
warranty period. The Faithful Performance security was reduced to the ten-percent (10%) warranty
amount as follows:
-1 - r:%eOdrpt%O8%O826'4~m279871 .l&m
Bond No. VRLP-CA-19644780 in the amount of $63,600 for Faithful Performance
Warranty for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements.
The Developer was required to post Labor and Materials security to ensure that suppliers of
materials and labor are paid. These securities are maintained in effect for the contractual six-month
period following City Council acceptance of the public improvements. No claims having been made
for either labor or materials dudng the lien period, Staff recommends release of the following
secudty:
Bond No. VRLP-CA-19644780 in the total amount of $318,000 for Labor
and Materials for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements.
The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained- Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 97-139 on December 12, 1997. The streets within the subdivision accepted are
portions of Country Glen Way, Redhawk Parkway, and Via Rio Temecula Road.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
-2- r:~gdrpt\98%O826~m279871 .l&m
VICIlffLTY MAP ~
1
L~A
;, RrMAIND[R
Parcel Map No. ~-7987-1
I neatinn Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 9
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
September 8, 1998
Extension of The Prohibition on Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages To
Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association Property Pursuant to Temecula
Municipal Code Section 9.14.030
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 98~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION ON
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO
CHARDONNAY HILLS HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
PROPERTY PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 9.14.030
DISCUSSION:
Chapter 9.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code generally prohibits the consumption of alcoholic
beverages in public places. Section 9.14.030 specifically permits the City Council to extend
this prohibition to the common areas of a homeowner's association property upon request of
the association and the posting of designated signs.
The City has received a duly authorized written request from the Board of Directors of the
Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association requesting the Council to extend the prohibition of
consumption of alcoholic beverages to the Association's common areas.
The Ordinance would not be enforced on Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association property
until such time as signs were posted and maintained, at the sole expense of the Association,
according to the following standards:
r:~bradley~agenda98~atcohol ,agn
980827 11086-00001 pmt 1480852 0
The signs shall contain a notice in substantially the following form: "Drinking of liquors,
beers, wine or other intoxicating beverages on this property, including greenbelt areas,
common walkways, and common driveways, is prohibited by Chapter 9.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code and violators are subject to criminal prosecution which could
result in imprisonment and a fine."
The signs shall be posted at each entrance to the community recreation center and in
common areas of the Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association property.
The signs shall be not less than eighteen (18) inches by twenty (20) inches, with letters
no less than one (1) inch in height.
d. The signs shall have a white background with black lettering.
Violations of the Ordinance would be handled through either criminal or administrative citations
issued by the Sheriff's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The only costs to the City would be the costs of prosecution of violations of Section 9.14.030 if
the violations were processed criminally rather than administratively.
Attach ments:
1. Resolution 98-
2. Chapter 9.14 of Temecula Municipal Code
3. Letter from Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association
2
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION ON
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO
CHARDONNAY HILLS HOMEOWNER' S ASSOCIATION
PROPERTY PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTION 9.14.030
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
and declare that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine
a. Chapter 9.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code generally prohibits the
consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places. Section 9.14.030 specifically permits the
City Council to extend this prohibition to the common areas of a homeowner's association
property upon request of the association and the posting of designated signs.
b. The City has received a duly authorized written request from the Board of
Directors of the Chardonnay Hills Homeonwer's Association requesting the Council to extend
the prohibition of consumption of alcoholic beverages to the Association' s common areas.
c. The extension of the prohibition of consumption of alcoholic beverages to the
common areas of the Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association will enhance the health,
safety and general welfare of the community.
Section 2. The terms of Section 9.14.030 are hereby extended to the common areas
of the Chardonnay Hills Homeowner' s Association and, therefore, pursuant to Section 94.030,
no person shall drink any beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or
other alcoholic beverages within the common areas of the Chardonnay Hills Homeowner' s
Association. The Chardonnay Hills Homeowner's Association shall post and maintain, at the
Association's sole cost and expense, the signs required by Section 9.14.030(b) subject to the
following requirements:
a. The signs shall contain a notice in substantially the following form: "Drinking
of liquors, beers, wine or other intoxicating beverages on this property, including greenbelt
areas, common walkways, and common driveways, in prohibited by Chapter 9.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code and violators are subject to criminal prosecution which could result
in imprisonment and a fine."
980827 11086-00001 pmt 1480851 0
r: \bradley\agenda98\alcohol. res
b. The signs shall be posted at each entrance to the community recreation center
and at the other entrances to the common areas.
c. The signs shall be not less than eighteen (18) inches by twenty (20) inches, with
letters no less than one (1) inch in height.
d. The signs shall have a white background with black lettering.
e. The City Manager shall be authorized to modify the sign requirements of
subsections b. through d. of this section as needed to effectively implement the terms of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPRO VED AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this ~ day of , 1998.
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
AT'FEST:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
-2-
980827 11086-00001 pmt 1480851 0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this __ day of , 1998, by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
-3-
980827 11086-00001 pmt 1480851 0
THE AVALON MANAGEMENT GROUR INC.
"Excellence in Association Management"
31590 Raftwad Canyon Road Canyon Lake, California 92587 (909) 244-0048 Fax (909) 244-0520
August 13, 1998
CITY MANAGER -- RON BRADLEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. BOX 9033
TEMECULA, CA. 92589-9033
Re:
Chardonnay Hills HOA
Alcohol Consumption on Association Property
Conmaunity Recreation Center-- 32195 Chemin Clinet
Dear Mr. Bradley:
The Chardonnay Hills Board of Directors is anxiously awaiting a reply to our letter dated
June 2, 1998. I have enclosed said letter for your reference.
The above mentioned letter was apparently sent to Chief LeBahn with the Temecula Police
Force as he contacted me shortly after receipt of such. He stated that he was in support of
our request and implied that Chardonnay Hills was the first Association to request the City
to adopt ordinance 9.14.030; which legally prohibits alcohol on the Association common
property.
Please respond in some way to our request. We understand that this issue will need to be
placed on a future agenda. Do you have an approximate month in which this will take
place?
Sincer. e, ly, /~~
/~.._..-,-._.,/
Rebecca Pesak, AMS
as Agent for the Board of Directors
Chardonnay Hills HOA
Enclosure
PlayadelRey(310)577-7711 · Canyon Lake(909) 244.0048 · SanDiego(619)738-9249
THE AVALON MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
"Excellence in Association Management"
31590 Railroad Canyon Road Canyon Lake, California 92587 (909) 244-0048 Fax (909) 244-0520
June 2, 1998
CITY MANAGER -- RON BRADLEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. BOX 9033
TEMECULA, CA. 92589-9033
Chardonnay Hills HOA
Alcohol Consumption on Association Property
Community Recreation Center -- 32195 Chemin Clinet
Dear Mr. Bradley:
As managing agent for Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association, the Board of Directors
has requested that I write you this letter.
Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association has experienced an influx of alcohol
consumption at the community recreation center. According to eye witnesses, young
adults enter the facility by hopping the fence line. After the trespassers consume an excess
of bottled beer, they break the bottles around and in the pool. There have been other acts
of vandalism within the recreation facility as well.
Chardormay Hills HOA, Rules and Regulations, prohibit the consumption of alcohol on
common areas. The Board has encouraged homeowners to contact the police if they
witness such occurrences as previously mentioned. However, as said property is privately
owned by the Association, and the police do not have formal jurisdiction over such; we
are respectfully requesting that the City Council adopt a resolution approving City
Ordinance 9.14.030 (copy attached) which will legally prohibit alcohol consumption on
Chardonnay Hills common area property.
City Ordinance 9.14.030 is ambiguous as to the signage criteria. Although, after placing
numerous phone calls to various City personnel, Lt. Joe Domino with the Temecula Police
Department, consulted the Cities attorney who suggested that a sign be clea~y posted at
each entrance of the recreation facility. It was also suggested that the signs follow the
vehicle code requirements which include but may not be limited to the following: a) 18" x
20" with no less than 1" lettering; b) white background with black letters; c) City
Ordinance in a contrasting color, such as, red. The Board is willing to install such
signage and intends, if the City Council is willing to adopt a resolution, to use the
suggested verbiage cited in said City Ordinance.
We thank you in advance for considering our request. We look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Pesak, AMS
as Agent for the Board of Directors
Chardonnay Hills HOA
Enclosure
Playa del Rey (310) 577-7711 ® Canyon Lake (909) 244-0048 , San Diego (619) 738-9249
9.14.010
Chapter 9.14
CONSUMPTION AND POSSESSION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PROHIBITED
IN CERTAIN PUBLIC PLACES
Sections:
9.14.010
9.14.020
9.14.030
Consumption of alcoholic
beverages in public prohibited.
Possession of open containers
of alcoholic beverages in public
places prohibited.
Consumption of alcoholic
beverages on homeowner
association properties
prohibited.
9.14.010 Consumption of alcoholic
beverages in public prohibited.
The drinking of beer, wine, liquor, fermented
malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic
beverage shall be prohibited at the following loca-
tions, unless specifically permitted by the prior
written approval of the city:
A. On any public street, roadway, boulevard,
alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property
owned, controlled and/or operated by the city,
county or any public agency;
B. In the public parking, loading, access, and
common areas of any commercial shopping center;
except on the premises of a commercial establish-
ment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from
the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control; or
C. Within any public park, recreational area, or
recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated
by the city, county, or any public agency. (Ord. 97-
07 § l(part))
ing beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage,
intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage,
which has been opened, or a seal broken, or the
contents of which have been partially removed, at
the following locations, unless specifically permitted
by the prior written approval of the city:
A. On any public street, roadway, boulevard,
alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property
owned, controlled and/or operated by the city,
county or any public agency;
B. In the public parking, loading, access and
common areas of any commercial shopping center;
except on the premises of a commercial establish-
ment holding a valid on-sale license or peait from
the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control; or
C. Within any public park, recreational area, or
recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated
by the city, county, or any public agency. (Ord. 97-
07 § l(part))
9.14.030 Consumption of alcoholic
beverages on homeowner
association properties prohibited.
No person shall drink any beer, wine, liquor,
fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or
other alcoholic beverage, upon property, including
greenbelt areas, common walkways and common
driveways, owned or controlled by a homeowner's
association where:
A. The homeowner's association has requested
in writing that the city extend its drinking prohibi-
tion upon the homeowner' s association property and
the city council has adopted a resolution approving
such request; and
B. The homeowner's association has posted on
the property a notice in substantially the following
form:
9.14.020 Possession of open containers of
alcoholic beverages in public
places prohibited.
No person shall have in his or her possession,
with intent to consume any part of the contents
thereof, any bottle, can or other receptacle contain-
Drinking of liquors, beers, wine or other intoxi-
cating beverages on this property, including
greenbelt areas, common walkways, and common
driveways, in prohibited by Chapter 9.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code and violators are sub-
158-7 (Temecula II-97)
9.14.030
ject to criminal prosecution which could result in
imprisonment and a fine.
(Ord. 97-07 § 1 (part))
Crerrtcula 11-97) 158-8
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady '
Assistant City Mana
September 8, 1998 (//
Resolution in Opposition to Proposition 9 (Electric Restructuring Initiative)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 9, THE UTILITY
RATE REDUCTION AND REFORM ACT
BACKGROUND: Since 1996 the State of California has passed several pieces of legislation
which will restructure California's electric service industry. This legislation allows users to
purchase electricity from existing investor-owned utilities such as Southern California Edison
(SCE), or from an Energy Services Provider. The existing utilities would continue to provide and
maintain the electrical distribution and transmission system. The legislation also required
certain rate reductions, allowed electric corporations to recover certain "transition" costs, and
authorized the issuance of up to $10 billion in bonds for the purpose of financing the rate
reduction.
Earlier this year, an initiative was qualified for the November ballot that would amend this
legislation. This measure; known as Proposition 9, would require a 20 percent reduction for
residential and small commercial customers, and would not permit investor-owned utilities to
pass on the costs to repay the rate reduction bonds through charges to customers. How, or
if, the utilities could recapture these costs is not clear.
The City has been requested by SCE to take a position in opposition to Proposition 9. The
League of California Cities has recently announced its opposition to this measure because of
"negative fiscal impacts it would have on cities, the uncertainty that would result in the
municipal bond market as a result of questions about repayment of the $6 billion in rate
reduction bonds, and the unsettling effects Proposition 9 would have on the newly restructured
electricity services market". Staff agrees with this analysis and recommends that the Council
adopt a resolution in opposition to Proposition 9.
R: I0 GRAD ItJIPROP,.9.090898. A GENDA. RPT. D 0 C 1 9/2/98
A number of other organizations have also taken positions in opposition to Proposition 9,
including the California Taxpayers' Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, and the
California State Association of Counties. Locally, the Temecula Valley Economic Development
Corporation, the Cities of Norco and Corona, and the Western Riverside Council of Governments
have taken positions in opposition to this proposition.
FISCAL IMPACT: If this measure were approved, direct fiscal impacts to the City of
Temecula are unclear. Direct impacts could include loss of franchise fees due to rate reductions
(currently $407,000 per year). However, these could be offset by reductions in the City's
electricity costs (currently ~818,000 per year).
ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 98-
R: t OGRAD YJI PROP9. 090898. A GENDA. RPT, DO C 2 9/1/98
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 9.090898, THE
UTILITY RATE REDUCTION AND REFORM ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the 1998 Electric Utility Proposition would dismantle California's new competitive
electricity market, eliminating customer choice and competitive electricity rates; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislative Analyst and Department of Finance have determined the net
impacts of this proposition on local governments would be revenue reductions potentially in the
tens of millions of dollars annually through 2001-02; and
WHEREAS, the proposition could create a $6 billion hole in the state budget, resulting in
significant reductions in funding to local government and critical services such as police and
fire, impairing community health and welfare, public safety and community quality of life; and
WHEREAS, the precedent set by disallowing payment on rate reduction bonds could impair the
ability of state and local governments to secure low-cost financing for local infrastructure bonds
and other types of bonds, and could cost California taxpayers billions of dollars in lawsuits; and
WHEREAS, the proposition could have a devastating effect on those services and programs
dependent upon State General Fund revenues; and
WHEREAS, passage of this measure could exacerbate the financial problems experienced
through unfunded State mandates; and
WHEREAS, this proposition jeopardizes the state's economic recovery by creating uncertainty
for California-based companies, as well as those considering relocating to our State.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
oppose Proposition 9, the Utility Rate Reduction and Reform Act.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula held the 8th
day of September, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk
R:IOGRAD YJIPROPg. 090898.AGENDA.RPT. DOC 3 9/1/98
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 9.090898 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 1998, by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:IOGRADYJIPROPg. 090898, AGENDA,RPT. DOC 4 9/1/98
ITEM 11
CITY
DIR.
CITY
APPROVAL
ATTORNEY
OF FINANCE
MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
September 8, 1998
Purchase of Three (3) Public Works Vehicles
An I S,t~
Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management a y
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of three (3) 1999 Chevrolet full size trucks from
Paradise Chevrolet/Buick in the amount of $74,647.7'1.
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the 1998/99 annual Operating Budget approved the funding
for the purchase of three (3) Public Works Department trucks. The current vehicles, which will be
replaced, have been fully depreciated. One (1) of the three (3) trucks, 1992 Chevy S-10 extended
cab, will remain in the Public Works fleet and will be utilized in a less demanding role, The Public
Work's inspection staff will use the three new full size trucks.
On August 3, 1998, the City mailed nine (9) Requests for Proposal CRPF's") to local vendors for
the purchase of the three (3) trucks (see attached vendor list). Of the nine (9) RPF's that the staff
sent out only one proposal was received as listed below. The staff was expecting to see more
competition, as the City Purchasing Specialist was in communication with all the dealerships to
ensure a complete understanding of the RFP. The purchase of these trucks from Paradise
Chevrolet will satisfy the vehicular requirements of the Public Works Department. It is also
important to note that once this approval is finalized, it will take approximately 10 to 12 weeks for
delivery.
Dealer Vehicle/model # Price
Paradise Chevrolet (3) Full size, extended cab $24,882.57
4WD pick-up
Extended Price
$74,647.71
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for vehicle
depreciation expense for this fiscal year.
Attachments: Vehicle Vendor List
CITY OF TEMECULA
LOCAL VEHICLE VENDOR LIST
GRIFFIN GMC TRUCK
41872 MOTOR CAR PKWY
TEMECULA, CA 92591
NISSAN OF TEMECULA
41895 MOTOR CARPKWY
TEMECULA, CA 92591
TEMECULA VALLEY TOYOTA
2663 1 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
NORM REEVES SUPER GROUP
26755 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
PARADISE CHEVROLET
26845 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
SCHUMACHER AUTO
SALES
28733 VIA MONTEZUMA
TEMECULA, CA 92590
RANCHO FORD
26895 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
CARRIAGE MOTOR COMPANY
41872 MOTOR CAR PKWY
TEMECULA, CA 92591
TEMECULA MAZE) A
26799 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
ITEM 12
ORDINANCE NO. 98-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING PORTIONS OF SECTION
17.24.020.D OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO ON-SITE STORAGE IN VEHICLES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the .Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general
plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
C. The City Council recognizes that certain areas of the City have historically been
subject to restrictions on the parking of recreational vehicles on residential property through private
covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC & R's") and in adopting this Ordinance, and specifically
§17.24.020.D. 1 .g., the Council intends to establish City recreational vehicle parking restrictions in
areas which have been restricted by private C C & R's and to exempt areas which have not been
subject to such historical restrictions; and
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.24.020.D.1 through 17.24.020. D.6 of the Development Code is
amended to read as follows:
D. Location of Parking and Loading Facilities.
1. Parking-Residential Uses. The parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be
subject to the provisions listed below. Vehicles, as used in this subsection D shall include, but not
be limited to, commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, including those defined in Section 18010
of the Califomia Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers,
camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other non-
motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle,
automobiles, motorcycles, mopeds and any similar item. Parking shall be defined as the standing
of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while
actually engaged in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers as described below (d).
Storage shall be defined to mean to place or leave in a location for later use.
a. The design guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall conform to the
provisions herein of the development code.
b. Vehicle parking shall be within the enclosed garage, carport or other required
or authorized off-street paved parking area.
R:ordsLo8-16 1
c. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way or
adjacent properties shall be paved with an impermeable hardened surface capable of supporting the
weight of the vehicle. Such area shall be maintained in a usable condition free of potholes and
broken sections sufficient to prevent mud and/or dust, without accumulation of loose material or
other deterioration.
d. Except as provided for in Section F below, commercial vehicles, recreational
vehicles including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks,
trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable
recreational and commercial equipment, other non-motodzed vehicles, regardless of length or width
that are detached from a motor vehicle may be parked or stored in the side or rear yard; provided,
that such area is screened from view from the street, public right-of-way and adjacent properties by
a fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet in height.
e. Vehicles parking within side and rear yard areas shall be limited to five
percent of the total lot area or five hundred square feet, whichever is greater.
f. Except as provided Herein, recreational vehicles including those defined in
Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks, semi-trailers,
campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial equipment, other
non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a motor vehicle
temporarily parked within public view within the Actual Front Yard, unscreened comer side yard or
unscreened side yard abutting a street may be parked or left standing for periods of time not to
exceed three (3) consecutive days for loading and unloading the vehicle. No vehicle parking or
storage shall be allowed in the Actual Front Yard.
g. Recreational vehicles, including those defined in Section 18010 of the
California Health and Safety Code, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreation
equipment which are parked or stored on properties within Area A of the City shall not be subject to
the parking restrictions of subsections D.1 .d. through D.l.f. of this Section, provided that if such
vehicles are parked or stored in the Actual Front Yard, the vehicle shall be parked or stored on the
designated and improved driveway portion of the Actual Front Yard. For the purposes of this
subsection "Area A of the City" shall mean those properties within the City which were not subject
to pdvate covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC & R's), as of August 25, 1998, which in any
way, prohibited or restricted the parking or storage of recreational vehicles on the property whether
or not the CC & R's provide for a homeowners association. The City Manager is hereby authorized
and directed to prepare a list and map of the properties within area A and to maintain said list and
map. Nothing in this Subsection (g.) shall be construed so as to require or authorize the City to
enforce private CC & R's in Area A.
h. Recreation vehicles, including those defined in Section 18010 of the California
Health and Safety Code, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreation equipment
which are parked or stored on occupied residential lots of one half (1/2) acre or larger shall not be
subject to the parking restrictions of subsections D. 1 .d. through D. 1 .f. of this Section.
i. No commercial vehicles which exceeds a gross weight of one and one-half
tons, a width of eighty inches, a height of seven feet or a length of twenty-five feet; shall be parked
on any portion of a residential lot unless:
It is actively involved in making pickups and deliveries;
R :ordsLq8-16 2
ii.
It is in connection with, and in aid to, the performance of a service to,
or on, the property where the vehicle is parked, while actively involved
in such activity; or
iii.
It is in conformance with the conditions of approval for a valid home
occupation permit as provided in Section 17.04.030 of the
Development Code.
j. Guest Parking Spaces. Required guest parking spaces in residential areas
shall be designated as such with signage and restricted to the use by guests.
infraction.
Violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as an
I. In addition to the residential parking requirements, one off-street parking
space shall be provided for each guest room of a bed and breakfast. Tandem parking shall be
permitted. Guest parking shall not be permitted in required setback areas.
m. A maximum of 2 commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles including those
defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers, motor trucks,
semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large portable recreational and commercial
equipment, other non-motorized vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached from a
motor vehicle may be parked or stored on the side or rear yard of a parcel of land at any one time.
2. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreational
vehicles in proximity to residential users shall be permitted on lots of .5 acres or more unless part
of a master planned development, subject to approval of a conditional use permit.
a. All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of
block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping or building mass.
b. Retail or wholesale activity, commercial dismantling, repair or storage
wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled parts are not permitted.
3. Vehicles and Equipment Repair and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment under
Repair. The following provisions shall apply to any commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles
including those defined in Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety Code, trucks, trailers,
motor trucks, semi-trailers, campers, camper shells, boats or other large podable recreational and
commercial equipment, other non-motodzed vehicles, regardless of length or width that are detached
from a motor vehicle, in all residential districts, and to all sites in any other district used for residential
occupancy:
a. Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying,
restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless
conducted within a garage or accessory building, or in an area screened from view from the street
and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall, or equivalent screening.
b. Stodng, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof,
which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an essential or legally
required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory
building, or in an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located
fence, wall or equivalent screening.
R:ordsL~8-16 3
c. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (D)(3)(a) and (b) of this
section, emergency or minor repairs and shod-term or temporary parking of any of the above
conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot, may be conducted for an aggregate
period of up to twenty-four hours in any continuous pedod of forty-eight hours exclusive of the
screening requirements.
d. For the purpose of this section, reference to types of conveyances shall have
the same meanings as defined in the Vehicle Code of the state of California, where such definitions
are available.
located:
Parking - Nonresidential Uses. Required parking for nonresidential uses shall be
a. On the same lot or parcel of land as the use which the facilities serve; or
b. On an adjoining lot or parcel of land under the same ownership as the lot
supporting the use the parking facilities serve; or
c. On a lot or parcel of land separated only by an alley (twenty feet wide or less)
from the lot or parcel supporting the use the parking facilities serve, provided:
The lots or parcels are under the same ownership, and
and
ii.
The lots or parcels would be contiguous if not separated by the alley,
iii. The direct vehicular and pedestrian passage between the lots or
parcels would be possible if the alley were vacated, and
iv.
it is intended to serve.
The parking is located not more than three hundred feet from the use
d. Parking attendant structures shall be limited to thirty square feet in floor area.
e. On a nonadjacent lot on the same block as the lot supporting the use the
parking facilities serve; provided, that the nonadjacent lot is under the same ownership. Same
ownership includes property that is subject to a binding recorded lease for not less than ten years
from commencement of use. The parking spaces leased must not be required for, or available to,
any other property and be within a maximum of three hundred feet from the property requiring the
parking.
6. Loading All Uses. Required loading facilities shall be located on the same lot or
parcel of land as the use served.
Section 3. Section 17.34.10 of the Development Code is amended to include the
following definitions:
"Yard, Actual Front: The space extending across ,the full width of the front of the lot, the
depth of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the front lot line or street right-of-
way line and the primary structure on the lot."
R:ordsLq8-16 4
"Yard, Actual Rear. The space extending across the full width of the rear of the lot, the depth
of which is the minimum horizontal distance between the rear lot line and the primary
structure on the lot."
"Yard, Actual Side: The space between the setback line of the main building and the side lot
line, extending from the front yard to the rear yard; the measured distance of the yard shall
represent the shortest distance between the side lot line and that portion of the main building
nearest the line from which the measurement is taken."
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect six (6) months
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be
posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within
15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance,
together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the
same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:ordsL~8-16 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 98-16 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 25th day of August, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula on the 8t"
day of September, 1998, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:ords%98-16 6
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AUGUST 25, '1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:16 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans,
Roberts, and Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk
Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Director Ford who abstained.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker advised that the Community Services Department has
completed the installation of air conditioning units at the CRC gymnasium and that the facility is
now open to the public.
With regard to the construction progress of Margarita Park and Winchester Creek Park, Mr.
Parker noted that the anticipated completion date is Spring 1999.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
In spite of the hot weather, General Manager Bradley advised that staff is in process of planning
the Christmas Parade.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:17 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, September 8, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUGUST 25, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:17
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts,
Stone, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk
Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1998.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Agency Member Ford who abstained.
At this time, the City Council reconvened.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUSINESS
2. Old Town People-Mover
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Being presented for discussion at the request of Councilmember Lindemans.
Agency Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Management Analyst Adams presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that
the purchase of a horse-drawn carriage and two horses would cost approximately $24,000, not
including stables, housing of equipment, etc.
Speaking in support of utilizing the horse-drawn carriage on the weekends, Chairperson
Lindemans relayed his desire to utilize a club car during the weekdays in an effort to transport
individuals throughout Old Town during the construction period and as well utilizing the club car
after the construction until Old Town has become a walking town. Mr. Lindemans as well
relayed his vision of utilizing a trolley to transport individuals from Old Town to the wineries,
Pechanga Center, the Mall, etc.
Although favoring some sort of transportation system in Old Town, Ms. Audrey Hicks, 28535
Front Street, stated that, in her opinion, the ambience of a club car would not be compatible with
that of Old Town, noting that the desired visual affect would be that of the 1850s. Ms. Hicks
spoke in support of the horse-drawn carriage as well as the trolley and, therefore, suggested
leasing a trolley and horses versus the City purchasing a trolley and horses.
In response to Ms. Hicks' request to have the Christmas Parade in Old Town, Executive
Director Bradley advised that Iogistical problems such as the number of Parade entrances
would make this difficult but noted that an Old Town Celebration will be scheduled after the
completion of the construction.
Mr. David Lewis, 28501 Front Street, requested that the Council retain the aesthetics and visual
appearance of a horse-drawn carriage versus a club car and suggested that the Council
consider leasing a powered trolley.
Mr. Joey Penazzo, representing Club Car, offered to the City, at no cost, the use of a club car
for a two-week period, noting that the club car could be decorated in order to give it a more
western appearance.
Applauding Chairman Lindemans' efforts to further aid the Old Town merchants during this
construction period, Agency Member Comerchere noted that, in his opinion, the use of a club
car would change the overall desired appearance for Old Town; noted that he would support the
purchase of a horse-drawn carriage; and requested that staff further explore and review the cost
differences between the City purchasing a horse-drawn carriage versus the purchase of a club
car.
Although thanking Club Car for its offer, Agency Member Ford noted that the use of a club car,
in his opinion, would only be beneficial in spot applications. Viewing the club car as a short-term
goal, Mr. Ford suggested supplementing the use of a horse-drawn carriage with a
lease/purchase option of the club car. Mr. Ford also noted that the horse-drawn carriage should
be privately operated versus the City purchasing the trolley, horses, etc.
In light of the Agency's action at its August 11, 1998, Agency Member Roberts suggested to
continue with the use of a horse-drawn carriage until the completion of the construction; after
which, he suggested that the Agency should review more long-term goals. Viewing the club car
as visually incompatible with Old Town, Mr. Roberts noted his opposition to the use of a club
car at this point in time. He relayed his support of leasing/purchasing a horse-drawn carriage as
a long-term solution to transportation in Old Town. Mr. Roberts also relayed his support to
utilize the club car for a two-week trial period for those times when the horse-drawn carriage is
not in use.
Executive Director Bradley noted that funds for staffing the club car for this two-week period
could be made available through the budget process.
MOTION: Chairman Lindemans moved to approve the use of a club car for a two-week trial
period. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained.
At this time, City Council recessed.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:42 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, September 8, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
ITEM 2
APPRON/,~
CITY
ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Agency Board/Executive Director
-Z
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Directo(~
September 8, 1998
Award a Professional Services Agreement to Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates, Inc. to Perform Services to Update the City of Temecula's
Redevelopment Plan Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No.
PA98-O 11 O)
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency award a Professional Services
Agreement in the Amount of ~34,620.00 to Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, Inc. to
Perform Services to Update the City of Temecula's Redevelopment Plan Environmental Impact
Report
BACKGROUND:
Need for the Update
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
Redevelopment Plan on July 12, 1988. Because the EIR is ten (10) years old and because the
existing conditions have changed in the City of Temecula, the City Attorney has requested that
Staff update the Redevelopment Plan EIR.
Requests for Proposals
Requests for Proposals were circulated to twenty-seven (27) consultant firms late-May, 1998.
Proposals were received in early June from four firms, and all of them were selected to be part
of the interview process. Consultant interviews were held on June 29, 1998. The interview
panel selected Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) as the top candidate to prepare
the Update based upon the qualifications and experience of their team as well as their
thorough knowledge of the area.
\\TEMEC_FS.201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\110 pa98 Staff Repor~-cc.doc
Negotiations with Top Candidate
Staff negotiated the final Scope of Work and Budget amount with RBF and the Professional
Services Agreement has been included as Attachment No. 1 to this Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available to evenly split the 834,620.00 cost of the EIR
between the Low-Moderate Housing Fund and the Redevelopment Fund from the Consulting
Services line item (165-199-999-5248 and 280-199-999-5248).
Attachments:
Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
and RBF - Page 3
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\l10pa98 Staff Repo~cc.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY AND RBF
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATAXDEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\i 10pa98 Staff Repo~cc.doc
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0110
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN EIR UPDATE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of September 8, 1998, between the
Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency") and
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on September 8, 1998, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than September 8,
1998, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall
employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing
similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The Agency agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount
shall not exceed Thirty-four thousand, six hundred, twenty dollars and zero cents ($34,620.00) for the
total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with
its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional
services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Executive Director. Consultant shall be
compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Executive
Director and Consultant at the time Agency's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The Executive Director may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars
($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous
month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees.
If the Agency disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of
receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-1-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTgPLANNING\PLANNING\i 10pa98.psa.doc
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall
pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the
work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section,
the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement,
Agency shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after
the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If
such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes
beyond the ConsultanUs control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be
considered a default.
b. If the Executive Director or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice
in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails
to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to
any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by Agency that relate to the performance of
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in
sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible.
Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Agency or its designees at reasonable times
to such books and records, shall give Agency the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall
permit Agency to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data,
documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting
documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and
other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall become the sole property of the Agency and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed
of by the Agency without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant
shall make available to the Agency, upon reasonable written request by the Agency, the necessary
computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer
files.
-2-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\110pa98.psa.doc
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than
that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the Agency,
its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to
or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant' s sole negligent or wrongful acts or
omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability
arising out of the negligence of the Agency.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
provided on ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Business Automobile Coverage written on ISO Business Auto Coverage
Form No. CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto).
(3)
Worker' s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California
and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance
or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation/Employer's Liability: Worker's Compensation
as required by State law and Employer's Liability Insurance in coverage
of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's
profession.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director. At the option of the Executive
Director, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects
the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
-3-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTgPLANNING\PLANNING\110pa98 .psa.doc
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1)
The Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed
by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of
the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant' s insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by
the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess
of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits
of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state
that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the
Agency.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the Agency.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the Agency with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided
by the Agency. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the Agency before work
commences. As an alternative to the Agency's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required
by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at
all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers,
employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees
or agents of the Agency. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or
liability whatever against Agency, or bind Agency in any manner.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\110pa98.psa.doc
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement,
Agency shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services
hereunder for Agency. Agency shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for
injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe
and comply with all such laws and regulations. The Agency, and its officers and employees, shall not be
liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Agency's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the Executive Director or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information
concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within
the Agency. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided
Consultant gives Agency notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify Agency should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court
order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with
respect to any project or property located within the Agency. Agency retains the right, but has no obli-
gation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding.
Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Agency and to provide Agency with the opportunity to review
any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, Agency's right to review any such
response does not imply or mean the right by the Agency to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by
a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other
address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: Executive Director
To Consultant:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
14725 Alton Parkway
P.O. Box 57057
Irvine, CA 92619-4122
Attention: Glenn Lajoie, AICP
-5-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA',DEPTS\PLANN1NG\PLANNING\110pa98.psa.doc
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only
Glenn Lajoie shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Glenn Lajoie may use assistants,
under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall
provide Agency fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Glenn Lajoie from Consultant's
employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency shall have the option to immediately
terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and
including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council
and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described
in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable
attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged
into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party' s own independent investigation
of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority
to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Ronald E. Bradley
Executive Director
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
-6-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\I lOpa98 .psa.doc
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Robert Bein. William Frost & Associates
By
Glenn Lajoie, AICP
-7-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\i 10pa98.psa.doc
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
See Atmched
-8-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\110pa98.psa.doc
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
II. SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work has been prepared pursuant to the information contained in the City's
Request for Proposal and subsequent information received from the City. The cost estimate, which is
itemized according to task and issue has been submitted separately in accordance with the City's RFP
requirements.
1.0 PROJECT SCOPING
1.1 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION
RBF will obtain and review available data for the project area as well as policy
documentation from the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, the Southern
California Association of Govemments, Local, State and Federal Agencies, and all
other agencies which may be affected by the Project. This information, along with
environmental data and information available from the City and other nearby
jurisdictions, will become part of the foundation of the EIR and will be reviewed and
incorporated into the analysis, as deemed appropriate.
1.2 AGENCY CONSULTATION
As indicated in Section 15083 of CEQA, many public agencies have found that early
consultation solves many potential conflicts that could arise in more serious forms later
in the review process. Although the Notice of Preparation will provide that
opportunity, RBF will conduct additional discussions with local, state and federal
agencies which will assist in the early stages of the analysis and issue delineation. This
scoping can be an effective way to bring together and resolve the concerns of affected
federal, state and local agencies as well as the local community.
1.3 FIELD RECONNMSSANCE
As a part of the early scoping for the Project, RBF will conduct a field study of the site,
reviewing existing land use and environmental conditions and conducting a detailed
photographic recording of on-site and surrounding uses. Our extensive video resource
capabilities will be utilized so that the entire RBF Team may have readily available site
information during the course of the analysis.
1.4 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY
RBF will prepare the Initial Study for the Project site. The Initial Study will contain a
description of the Project, the Project location, and a description of the environmental
setting of the Project site. The main body of the document will consist of a City-
approved environmental checklist and an accompanying environmental analysis.
The Project will be analyzed for potential to create significant environmental impacts
in the areas specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The Initial Study
will also include mandatory findings of significance regarding impacts upon biological
JN 401388 Page 4
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redeveloprnent Plan EIR Update
Deliverables:
2.0
resources, long-term verses short-term goals, cumulative impacts, and direct and
indirect impacts upon human beings.
1.5 NOTICE OF PREPARATION
RBF will prepare, distribute and file the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the EIR.
Distribution will be based on a City approved distribution list to be prepared by RBF
in conjunction with City Staff. This task includes certified mailing of a maximum of
thirty (30) notices to affected agencies and interested parties. Comments received in
response to the NOP will be evaluated during the preparation of the EIR.
Thirty (30) copies of the Notice of Preparation
Thirty (30) copies of the Initial Study
One (1) camera-ready Initial Study/NOP
PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR
2.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA and the City of Temecula CEQA
Implementation procedures for which the proposed project is subject to. This section
will identify the purpose of the study and statutory authority as well document scoping
procedures, summary of the EIR format, listing of responsible and trustee agencies and
documentation incorporated by reference.
2.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RBF will provide an Executive Summary for the EIR including a Project Summary, an
overview of project impacts, mitigation and levels of significance after mitigation,
summary of project alternatives and areas of controversy and issues to be resolved. The
Environmental Summary will be presented in a columnar format.
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project Description section of the EIR will detail the Project location, background
and history of the project, discretionary actions, characteristics, goals and objectives,
phasing, agreements, and permits and approvals which are required for the Project
based on available information. This section will include a summary of the local
environmental setting for the project. Exhibits depicting the regional and site vicinity
will be included in this section. An aerial photograph will be included within the
Project Description.
2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the
potential adverse effects of Project implementation (both individual and cumulative),
and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised during the scoping
process (Notice of Preparation responses, and any other relevant and valid informative
JN401388 Page 5
City of Ternecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
sources) will also be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all available data,
results from additional research, and an assessment of existing technical data. These
analyses will be performed by qualified Environmental Analysts, CEQA experts and
Planners at RBF.
The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing
conditions for each environmental issue area, identify short-term and long-term
environmental impacts associated with the project and their levels of significance.
Feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of
impacts and identify areas of unavoidable significant adverse impacts even after
mitigation. The environmental documentation will assist in identifying constraints,
modifications and improvements which may be incorporated into the land planning
process. This section will include analysis for the following environmental issue areas:
A. Land Use and Relevant Planning
RBF will provide a comparative analysis based on the existing Redevelopment Plan in
relation to the original 1988 approved plan. Existing land uses within the Plan area will
be identified based on information compiled through City references which include the
1993 General Plan Update and EIR, and other studies for the project area. The EIR
will evaluate the Plan with regard to compatibility of existing and proposed land uses.
Impacts to existing and potential future land uses in the planning area will be assessed
for both construction (short-term) and operational (long-term) phases. RBF will
discuss the potential for intensification of uses in the project area and identify possible
impact to residences, businesses and other uses. Emerging land use trends and regional
access availability will also be assessed.
B. Population and Housing
Based on existing data, RBF will identify the existing population and housing within the
Project area, along with projected trends. The analysis will include a discussion of the
potential for residential displacement, housing rehabilitation, new housing and
employment. RBF will analyze the Project's impact upon the City and County
population and housing base. A jobs/ housing balance will be conducted to determine
the potential balance/imbalance between residential and employment uses within the
City. Mitigation measures for potential impacts will be recommended.
Traffic and Circulation
Based upon updated traffic data and information provided to RBF by the City, this
section will evaluate local and regional access, volumes, capacity and deficiencies for
area roadways. Although the 1993 General Plan and EIR provide a comprehensive
analysis for the project area, updated information from recent studies (if available) in
the project area and other data from the City will be necessary. Should this information
not be available, as directed by City Staff, RBF will prepare an amendment to the scope
of work which will provide a project area traffic analysis.
JN401388 Page 6
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
Project emissions would occur on both a short-term and long-term basis. Short-term
impacts associated with construction activities, including issues such as fugitive dust and
emissions from construction vehicles, will be identified and quantified where possible.
Long-term impacts would occur from both vehicular and stationary sources (emissions
associated with natural gas and power plants). Utilizing the CT-EMFAC7 computer
model, RBF will quantify the anticipated long-term emissions and compare them to
SCAQMD thresholds. For those pollutants which exceed thresholds, mitigation
measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of potential impacts to the
maximum extent possible. Air quality data from the nearest Air Monitoring Station will
also be included in a table identifying the number of days pollutants exceeded State
and/or Federal standards within the past five years.
In addition to the above analysis, this Section will include a description of the existing
air quality setting within the South Coast Air Basin and identify the various regulatory
documents which govern air quality within the region. The Plan's consistency with these
documents will then be evaluated. If a CALINE4 analysis is desired by the City to
determine localized carbon monoxide emissions, RBF will perform this Task under a
separate scope of work and fee.
E. Nobe
RBF will evaluate potential noise impacts in the project area, focusing on long-term
changes in noise levels due to traffic changes along area roadways and changes in
ambient noise levels associated with on-site activity. Noise impacts will be assessed
based on total increases in the ambient noise level and potential exceedances in City
standards. RBF will provide tables to identify impacts and mitigation measures
necessary to achieve the City of Temecula noise standards.
F. Public Services and Utilities
RBF staff will coordinate with City staff and affected public service and utility providers
to assess potential impacts. The following services, facilities and utility systems will be
analyzed:
· :. Sewer/Wastewater o:- Electricity
· :. Water Supply .:. Natural Gas
· :. Police -:. Solid Waste Disposal
· :. Fire -:- General Government
· :. Schools .:. Medical
· :- Parks/Recreation .:. Library
Letters describing the update will be sent to all service and utility agencies. Answers
will be requested, as appropriate, to document existing and planned facilities, current
and projected usages, and excess capacities. Additional infrastructure and services
capacity required to meet future needs associated with build-out of the Redevelopment
Plan will be described. Anticipated impacts will be assessed based upon a comparison
JN 401388 Page 7
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
of the increased demand for services and utilities and the ability of the City and other
utility districts to accommodate this increased demand.
G. Hydrology and Drainage
RBF environmental analysts will review existing data provided by the City and to
identify potential changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and amount of surface
runoff. The potential for the Plan to substantially degrade water quality, interfere with
groundwater recharge, contaminate a public water supply, or expose people to water-
related hazards will also be identified. Impacts of the developed condition hydrology
will be evaluated based on the proposed drainage improvements, including storm drain
improvements and grading plans provided by the City. Based on hydrologic
calculations provided by the City, RBF will analyze potential on and off-site drainage
related impacts during project construction and following project buildout and will
determine ultimate capacities of the existing drainage system. Mitigation measures will
be recommended to minimize the significance of short- and long-term grading and
drainage impacts.
H. Biological Resources
RBF will review and incorporate flora and fauna data for the project area based upon
references provided by the City. The analysis will focus on impacts within the project
area and required mitigation to reduce the significance of impacts. Although the 1993
General Plan and EIR provide a comprehensive analysis for the project area, updated
information from recent studies (if available) in the project area and other data from
the City will be necessary. Should this information not be available, as directed by City
Staff, RBF will prepare an amendment to the scope of work which will provide a project
area biological resources analysis.
L Cultural Resources
RBF will review and incorporate cultural and historic data for the project area based
upon references provided by the City. The analysis will focus on impacts within the
project area and required mitigation to reduce the significance of impacts.
2.5 GROWTH INDUCEMENT
RBF will discuss potential growth-inducing impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15126(g). The analysis in this section will be based on data from the City of
Temecula, California Department of Finance, the Southern California Association of
Governments and U.S. Census data. The Project's impact upon the jobs/housing
balance will be discussed and mitigation for any potential impacts will be
recommended.
2.6 CUMULATFVE IMPACTS
In accordance with Section 15130 (b)(1)(a) of CEQA, this section provides a listing of
cumulative projects and actions under consideration. The potential for impact and
JN 401388 Page 8
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of interaction with the
proposed development. RBF will consult with City Staff to define the appropriate
study area for the cumulative analysis. RBF will discuss cumulative impacts for each
environmental issue area identified above, and will provide both quantitative and
qualitative levels of analysis.
2.7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d), RBF will provide an analysis of two
alternatives, including an analysis of the "No Project" Alternative. The City is seeking
a sufficient level of detail to allow decision makers to gain a greater understanding of
all alternatives should a determination be rendered to support an alternative
development scenario. This alternatives section will culminate with the selection of the
environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA requirements.
2.8 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
To comply with the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 32180), RBF will
prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to be defined through
working with City staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps/procedures and in
order to provide a basis for monitoring such measures during and upon Project
implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist will serve as the foundation of the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Plan. The Checklist indicates
the mitigation measure number as outlined in the EIR, the EIR reference page (where
the measure is documented), a list of Mitigation Measure/Conditions of Approval (in
chronological order under the appropriate topic), the Monitoring Milestone (at what
agency/department responsible for verifying implementation of the measure), Method
of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a verification section for the
initials of the verifying individual date of verification, and pertinent remarks.
2.9 ADDITIONAL SECTIONS
RBF will provide additional sections in the EIR to meet CEQA and City requirements
including the following:
Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would Be Involved In the
Proposed Action ShouM It Be Implemented
Changes in the environment and uses on non-renewable resources which will occur as
a result of the Plan which can be considered irreversible or irretrievable will be
evaluated and discussed within this section of the EIR.
B. Effects Found Not To Be Significant
RBF will provide a qualitative explanation of issues checked "No Impact" in the City's
Initial Study in order to substantiate the conclusions of the Initial Study.
JN 401388 Page 9
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
C. Inventory of Mitigation Measures
This section will be a comprehensive list of mitigation measures for the proposed
Project. To allow direct incorporation of mitigation measures into Conditions of
Approval, RBF will provide a summary of mitigation measures, which will be numbered
consecutively.
D. Inventory of Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
This section will be a comprehensive list of unavoidable adverse impacts associated with
the Plan.
E. Organizations and Persons Consulted/Bibliography
Any federal, state or local agencies, other organizations and private individuals
consulted in preparing the EIR will be listed in this section. RBF will provide a
complete list of reference materials used in preparation of the EIR.
2.10 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS
The EIR will include a maximum of 15 exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify
the proposed Project environmental impacts. This effort will include graphic
modifications associated with the Redevelopment Han legal description. Should the
legal description modifications be substantially greater than the minor modifications
anticipated, further refinements/changes to the consultant agreement may be required,
subject to discussions with the City. Using state-of-the-art computer design equipment
and techniques, our in-house graphic design team will create professional quality, black
and white or full color exhibits, dividers and covers for the EIR and Appendices. This
Task assumes camera-ready base maps are provided by the City. All exhibits will be
8½" x 11" in size.
Deliverables: ·
Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft
Environmental Impact Report, Exhibits and Technical
Appendices
3.0 DRAFT EIR
3.1 P~L~IN~YDRAFTE~
RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the Administrative Draft
EIR. This task assumes that no substantive changes (e.g., Project Description or other
changes to the project) are made to the project or EIR assumptions as discussed with
staff during the EIR preparation. If desired by the City, RBF will provide the
Preliminary Draft of the EIR with all changes highlighted to assist the final check of the
document. In addition, RBF will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) for
submittal to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). RBF will also work with the
City to develop a distribution list for the NOC and Draft EIR (distribution by RBF).
RBF will also prepare and complete all distribution of public notices and newspaper ads
JN 401388 Page 10
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
4.0
consisting of posting one notice with the County Clerk and publishing once in a locally
adjudicated newspaper.
Deliverables: ·
Thirty (30) copies of the Draft EIR, Exhibits and
Technical Appendices
Thirty (30) copies of the Notice of Completion
One (1) camera-ready original of the Draft EIR,
Exhibits and Technical Appendices
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
4.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS/ADMINISTRATIVE FINAL EIR
RBF will respond to all comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public
review period, and any additional comments raised during public hearings. RBF will
prepare thorough, reasoned and sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues.
This task includes written responses to both written and oral comments received on the
Draft EIR during the public review period (includes review of hearing transcripts, as
required). The Draft Responses to Comments will be prepared for review by City staff.
Following review of the Draft Responses to Comments, RBF will finalize this section
for inclusion in the Administrative Final EIR. Should the amount of comments exceed
the budget allocation identified in Section IX, additional ftmding may be required.
Deliverables: ·
Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments/
Administrative Final EIR
4.2 FINAL EIR
The Final EIR will consist of the revised Draft EIR text, as necessary, and the
"Comments to Responses" section. The Draft EIR will be revised in accordance with
the responses to public comments on the EIR. To facilitate City review, RBF will
format the Final EIR with shaded text for any new or modified text, and "strike out"
any text which has been deleted from the Final EIR. RBF will also prepare and file the
Notice of Determination within five (5) days of EIR approval.
Deriverabies: ·
Twenty (20) copies of the Final EIR, including exhibits
and Technical Appendices
One (1) camera-ready original of the Final EIR,
Exhibits and Technical Appendices
Notice of Determination Filing
4.3 FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
RBF will provide administrative assistance to facilitate the CEQA process including the
preparation of the Notice of Determination, Statement of Overriding Considerations
and Findings for City use in the Project review process. RBF will prepare the Findings
in accordance with the provisions of Section 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA
JN 401388 Page 11
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for City Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
Guidelines and in a form specified by the City. RBF will submit the Draft Findings for
City review and will respond to one set of City comments.
Deliverables: ·
Two (2) copies of the Draft Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations
One (1) camera-ready Final Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations
5.0 PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, will be responsible for management and supervision of the EIR
Project Team as well as consultation with the City staff to incorporate City policies into the
EIR. Mr. Lajoie will undertake consultation and coordination of the analysis and review the
EIR for compliance with CEQA requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures. Mr.
Lajoie, with the assistance of RBF staff personnel, will consult with state and local agencies
regarding this environmental document. As the Project Manager, Mr. Lajoie will coordinate
with all technical staff, consultants, support staff and word processing toward the timely
completion of the EIR. Mr. Lajoie will attend all staff meetings and will represent the Project
Team at public hearings and make presentations as necessary.
Mr. Lajoie along with other key Project Team personnel will also be available to attend
meetings with affected jurisdictions, agencies and organizations as needed to identify issues,
assess impacts and define mitigation. Should the City determine that additional meetings
beyond the following five (5) meetings are necessary, sen ices will be provided under a separate
scope of work on a time and materials basis. (Budget estimate $400.)
One Kick-Off meeting (1)
Two meetings with City Staff to Draft EIR resolve issues, review comments on
Administrative Draft EIR and receive any necessary direction from City Staff
(2)
One public hearing with the Planning Commission (1)
One public hearing with the City Council (1)
It is the goal of RBF to serve as an extension of City staff throughout the duration of the EIR
Project. As is stated in UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT, RBF will be available to
meet with staff to discuss particular Project parameters, as required by the City. In addition,
RBF will prepare monthly progress reports for the Project which would be submitted with the
monthly invoicing. Each progress report will include a summary of tasks performed and the
percentage of work completed to date according to individual task.
Deliverables:
· Monthly work progress reports submitted by RBF to the City
JN401388 Page 12
City of Temecula
Revised Proposal for Ci.ty Redevelopment Plan EIR Update
IX. BUDGET
TASK
SCOPE OF ~.f~ OR K'
1.0 PROJECT SCOPING
1.1 Reseaxch and lnvestigati~'l
1.2 A~ C~ffi~
1.3 Field R~on~ce
1.4 ~ion of Ini~ Study
1.5 N~ of~
2.0 P~ON OF ~M~SB~E D~T E~
2. 1 In~ucti~ ~d P~
Z4 Envimm~ An~ys~
A. ~d Use ~d Rel~t PInning
B P~ ~dH~ng
C. Tm~ ~ C~
D. Air Q~i~
F. P~lic S~c~ ~d U~li~
~ Hy~o~ ~ ~n~
H. ~iolo~ R~
[. C~ R~o~c~
~,~ ~ow~
Z6 Cm~ve I~
2. 7 Al~v~ to ~e ~s~ Ac~on
2.8 Mitigation Monito~g ~ R~ng ~
Deliv~l~ '
3.0 D~T E~
~li~l~
4.0 F~ ~O~AL ~A~ ~RT
4.1 R~e to C~A~inis~ve Fin~ E~
4.2 F~ Effi
Deliv~l~
43 Fin~n~ ~d S~t orating Comi~
Deliv~l~
5.0 PROJE~ ~A~ON ~ ME~GS
T~ HOU~ : : .
*P~cent~Toalhb~n) Z: 5: :
: :
TOT~ COSTS
ILG. G.L K.T. M,S. B.M. G.A, [ Teal Total
130 85 IS 50 85 40 }louts Repro Cast
2
2
2
1
I
4
3
2 16
2 12
2
2 22
2 22
2 25
2 16
2 14
2 12
2 7
I 10
I I4
1
I 4
5 :
20 20
24
14
2 $170
2 $170
4 $270
9 $485
I
0 $400
4 $240
3 S255
t0 $850
3O
18
14
32
24
24
27
18
16
14
II
15
1
5
24 : 29
0 $200
S970
$770
$2,720
$2,040
$2,040
$1~420
$1~3o
$870
$770
$52O
:$585
$785
$1,385
$200
40 . S2,700
0 $1,400 $1.400
24
: ::: 0:$125
:18
0 Sl.000
14
0 $75
$2,1M0
S125
$h530
Sl ,000
$1,190
$75
$4,560
S2,550 $960 S3,200 $54,620
B.G. = Bill Green
G. L = Glenn Lajoie
K.T. = Keyin Thomas
MS. = Melani¢ Smith
B.M. = Bob Matson
G.A. = Graphic Artist
RBF has reviewed the professional services agreement presented by the City and generally accepts the terms set forth therein.
This Proposal shall be valid for a period of 90 days.
Progress billings will be forwarded based on payment criteria established by the City. These billings will include the fees
earned for the billing period. The City shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working days
from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect.
The fees proposed herein shall apply until July 1, 1999. Due to annual increases in costs associated with inflation, staff wage
increases and increases in direct costs, Consultant will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still
be completed after July 1, 1999, by ten-percent (10%).
Deviations or modifications from the Scope of Work will result in potential re-evaluation of the associated fees. Items not
specifically stated in the proposal will be considered an additional work item.
All work will be performed at a "Not to Exceed" contract price, which will become the fLxed price upon completion of
negotiations with the City Staff authorized to negotiate and agreement. The total budget includes all miscellaneous costs for
travel/mileage, reproduction, telephone, postal, delivery, reference materials and incidental expenses.
Should the City require additional copies of the Administrative Draft, Draft and Final Documents, RBF will provide a cost
estimate to the City and provide direct cost billing.
JN 401388 Page 31
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Consultant shall submit monthly invoices for work activities contained in Exhibit A. Such
invoices shall specify the total amount invoiced to date, and the total amount outstanding.
Such invoices shall be accompanied by a program report which specifies basic work
efforts which were completed, including a sunkmary of percent of work completed by work
tasks contained in Exhibit A.
-9-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\PLANNING\110pa98.psa.doc
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANG
, CITY MANAGER
JOINT MEETING OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND
TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Authorization to Advedise for Construction Bids for Old Town Streetscape
Concrete and Granite Intersection Treatments - Project No. PW97-05
PREPARED BY: .'i,J-Y2/William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Department of Public Works to advertise
for construction bids for concrete and granite intersection treatments in the Old Town Streetscape
project.
BACKGROUND: On June 11, 1998 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Valley
Crest Landscape, Inc. to complete the Old Town Streetscape project. To provide flexibility in funding
and selecting various improvements, the base bid for the Old Town Streetscape project was
supplemented with additive and deductive bid items. During the bid process one of the additives
was removed which included the artistic entrance archways and concrete and granite intersection
enhancements. On June 11th City staff was instructed to complete all work except the bronze
statuary. The archway design and construction is now proceeding independent from Valley Crest's
contract. We have not been successful in negotiating the additional work with Valley Crest. Also
Valley Crest requested an additional 36 working days to complete the work, which would extend
construction through the Christmas season. We are therefore requesting authorization to advertise
for a separate contract to complete the intersection enhancements. The additional work consist of
specially treated concrete street surfacing at both gateway entrances, and at the intersections on
Front Street and 3% 5th, 6th and Main Street. Also granite enhancements are pro osed at both
gateway entrances, and at the intersection of Front Street and Main Street and 6t~ Street. The
estimate for the concrete and granite treated intersection and gateway drives is $235,000.
Construction Schedule
The contract documents for the completion of the new concrete and granite intersections will spedfy
that no work be completed between November 15, 1998 and January 10, 1999.
FISCALIMPACT:
The Old Town Streetscape Project is a RDA Capital Improvement Project and is funded with existing
RDA bond proceeds. Adequate funds are available for this work in the current construction
contingency, Account No. 280-199-824-5804.
R:\AGDRPT\98',OgOS~PW97-OE.A.DOC/ajp
ITEM 13
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
'recto ~''
Gary Thornhill, Community Development D~ r
September 8, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment, Development Code) - An
amendment to the City's Development Code, adding Section 17.08.050.S
(Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards) to the
Development Code
PREPARED BY: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning
Amendment, Development Code); and
2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE
CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE AND
TRUCK DEALERSHIPS
BACKGROUND: The City's Development Code encourages automobile dealerships to be
located in the Service Commercial (SC) zone. The minimum landscaping requirement in this zone
is twenty percent (20%). Staff is concerned that automobile dealerships have unique requirements
when it comes to landscaping their sites because they require large outdoor display areas. This
large display area dictates a proportionally larger amount of landscaped area than a business that
typically relies on interior display. It is staffs opinion that the critical areas which need to be
landscaped at auto dealerships are: the perimeter (especially the streetscape and any buffering
with adjacent uses), the end of drive lanes in display areas and adjacent to buildings which are
accessed by the public.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~97pa98-ccl .doc
1
Staff presented revised landscape standards for automobile dealerships at the May 20, 1998
Planning Commission hearing. Staff was unable to meet with the auto dealers prior to the
Commission meeting. As a result, Staff held several meetings with the auto dealers and conducted
several field inspections of the existing auto dealerships in the weeks that followed the May 20,
1998 Planning Commission hearing. The field investigations revealed that there in no consistency
with the landscape standards for the existing dealerships. Based upon the input from the auto
dealers and the information derived from the field inspections, staff refined the proposed landscape
standards which were originally heard by the Commission. Because of the changes, staff was
directed by the City Attorney to bring this item back before the Planning Commission prior to the
Council taking an action on this item. The Commission, by a 4-(:) vote (Commissioner Slaven was
absent), recommended approval of the landscape standards at their August 5, 1998 meeting.
SPECIFIC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend the
Development Code adding Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership
Landscape Standards) to the Development Code to read as follows. Exhibits have been prepared
for S.1 .b.1 and S.1 .b.2 (reference Attachment No. 5) and are intended to be included as a graphic
in the Development Code. In summary, the Commission recommendations are as follows:
1. A minimum five foot (5') wide landscape island shall be required at the end of all display area
lanes adjacent to the main entry drive lane.
2. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall meet one of the following criteria:
C,
do
Minimum of twelve feet (12') of landscaping shall be provided, measured from the rear
of the sidewalk to the display area length and shall be surrounded by low-growing
shrubs, groundcover and turf; or
A minimum of twenty feet (20') of landscaping shall be provided, measured from the rear
of the sidewalk to the display area, with display area allowed to encroach into eight (8)
feet of the landscape area.
Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All portions of the
property which abut an existing or proposed residential use shall have a minimum ten
foot (10') wide landscape buffer.
Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly identified and
will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located on the perimeter or adjacent
to residential development or sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner
discussed above.
Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards) of the
Development Code as amended is provided in Attachment No. 2.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNINGXSTAFFRPT~97pa98-ccl .doc
2
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 98- - Page 4
Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards)
of the Development Code - Page 9
Planning Commission Staff Report (August 5, 1998) - Page 12
Planning Commission Minutes (August 5, 1998) - Page 13
Exhibits - Page 14
a. Twelve foot (12') wide landscape buffer
b. Twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTX297pa98-ccl .doe
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~97pa98..ccl .doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. I
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE
CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE AND
TRUCK DEALERSHIPS.
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code and
the Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109
(Zoning Amendment - Development Code), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, Planning Staff met with several concerned individuals regarding the proposed
modifications to the landscape standards for automobile, motorcycle and truck dealerships; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission re-considered this item under Planning Application
No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment - Development Code), on August 5, 1998, at a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0297
(Zoning Amendment - Development Code); and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning
Amendment - Development Code), on September 8, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTX297pa98-ccl .doc
5
Section 1. Findings· That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Govemment Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.08,050.S (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards)is
hereby added to the Development Code and reads as follows:
"S. Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards.
Landscape Standards· The following standards shall be applied to all new
automobile motorcycle and truck dealerships:
Display areas: a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape island shall be
required at the end of all display area lanes adjacent to the main entry ddve
lane. A one foot stdp, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the
Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb
immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape
islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall
have automatic irrigation.
b=
Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall
meet one of the following criteria:
A minimum of twelve feet (12') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area length
and shall be surrounded by low-growing shrubs, groundcover and
tuff; or
A minimum of twenty feet (20') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area, with
display area allowed to encroach into eight (8) feet of the landscape
area.
Display areas shall be paved with concrete, a maximum of
twenty (20) feet in length and shall be surrounded by low-
growing shrubs, groundcover and tuff.
The number of display areas allowed shall be calculated in
the following manner: 3 display spaces per 100 linear feet of
street frontage. Fractional spaces (.5 and over) shall be
rounded up.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~297pa98-ccl .doc
6
No display area shall be located immediately adjacent to
another display area. Landscaping shall be provided
between display areas.
Cm
Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All
portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use
shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer.
de
All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or
proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide
landscape buffer.
All customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through
special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the
landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the
Development Code.
Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately
screened from adjacent residential uses.
Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly
identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located
on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas
they shall be screened in the manner discussed above."
Section 3. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that
although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against
the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~297pa98-ccl .doc
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __day of ,199__.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of ,199__, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTx297pa98-ccl .doe
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
SECTION 17.08.050.S (AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE AND TRUCK DEALERSHIP
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTM297pa98-ccl .doc
9
Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards)is hereby added to the
Development Code and reads as follows:
"S. Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards.
Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new
automobile motorcycle and truck dealerships:
Display areas: a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape island shall be
required at the end of all display area lanes adjacent to the main entry drive
lane. A one foot stdp, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to the
Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb
immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape
islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall
have automatic irrigation.
Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage shall
meet one of the following criteria:
A minimum of twelve feet (12') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area length
and shall be surrounded by low-growing shrubs, groundcover and
tuff; or
A minimum of twenty feet (20') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area, with
display area allowed to encroach into eight (8) feet of the landscape
area.
Display areas shall be paved with concrete, a maximum of
twenty (20) feet in length and shall be surrounded by low-
growing shrubs, groundcover and tuff.
The number of display areas allowed shall be calculated in
the following manner: 3 display spaces per 100 linear feet of
street frontage. Fractional spaces (.5 and over) shall be
rounded up.
No display area shall be located immediately adjacent to
another display area. Landscaping shall be provided
between display areas.
C=
Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All
portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use
shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer.
de
All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or
proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide
landscape buffer.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTL297pa98-ccl.doc
10
e,
All customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through
special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the
landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the
Development Code.
Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately
screened from adjacent residential uses.
Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly
identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located
on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas
they shall be screened in the manner discussed above."
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFTS\PLANN1NG\STAFFRPT~97pa98-ccl .doc
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 5, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201 \ DATA\DEPTS\PLA NNING\STA FFRPTX297pa98-cc 1. doc
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
ORIGINAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
August 5, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment, Development
Code) - An amendment to the City's Development Code, adding Section
17.08.050.S (Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape
Standards) to the Development Code
Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment, Development Code);
and
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending that the City
Council approve an Ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance of
the City Council of the City of Temecula, California,
Amending Portions of the City's Development Code
Pertaining to Landscape Requirements for Automobile,
Motorcycle and Truck Dealerships" based upon the
Analysis contained in the Staff Report
BACKGROUND
This item was originally heard by the Planning Commission at their May 20, 1998 hearing. At
that meeting, staff presented landscape standards which were proposed to be added to the
Development Code for automobile dealerships. Staff was unable to meet with the auto dealers
prior to the Commission meeting to discuss the proposed changes and receive their input
regarding implementation. Staff held several meetings with the auto dealers and conducted
several field inspections of the existing auto dealerships in the weeks that followed the May 20,
1998 Planning Commission hearing. The field investigations revealed that there in no
consistency with the landscape standards for the existing dealerships. Based upon the input
from the auto dealers and the information derived from the field inspections, staff has refined
the proposed landscape standards which were originally heard by the Commission. Because
of the changes, staff was directed by the City Attorney to bring this item back before the
Planning Commission prior to the Council taking an action on this item. Both staff and the auto
dealers are in agreement with revised language proposed below.
R:',STAFFRPT, 297PA98.1"CI 7/27/98 n~' 1
ANALYSIS
Based upon meetings between staff and the auto dealers, staff recommends that the following
language be added to the proposed Section 17.08.050.S of the City's Development Code.
Language added since the May 20, 1998 Commission hearing appears in redlined text, with
deletions as a strikeout. The standards have been expanded to include motorcycle and truck
dealerships. Exhibits have been provided for Sections S. 1 .b.
Proposed Section 17.08.050. S. (Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape
Standards)
Staff recommends that Section 17.08.050.S. (Automobile, ;~~!i~iii{~i~i~i~:~ Dealership
Landscape Standards) be added to the Development Code which would include the following
language:
So Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards.
Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new
a u t o m o b il e ~~!~!~:~!~iiii~ d e ale r s hi p s:
a,
Display areas: a minimum ten ~i~ foot (I 0~') wide landscape island shall
be required at the end of all display area lanesi~i~j~ !~!~. ~!~i~ ~
d~!~iiii:!~i~. A two ~ foot strip, made of concrete or other materials
acceptable to the Community Development Director, shall be located next
to the curb immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said
landscape islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover
and shall have automatic irrigation.
b,
Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage
shall have a m;nirnum twenty foot (20') wide landscape buffer~:!~i~tii~ei
R :~STAFFRl~T'x297PA98. PC i 7/27/98 mf 2
Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All
portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential
use shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer.
All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing
or proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide
landscape buffer.
The Community Development Director may increase the above mentioned
minimum landscape buffering requir{mcnts if it is determined that it is
necessary to mitigate impacts from the project.
All employee and customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified,
either through special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be
subject to the landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H
of the Development Code.
fe
Buildings !!!ii~i~!!~!:i!~i~:~~i~ii~!:~!~i~!~ii~ which are accessible to
the public shall have landscaping around the perimeter
~:..~Z~i~i~iii!~to accomplish the following: break up the building massing.
break up large areas of hardscape, provide visual interest and provide
shade.
Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be
adequately screened from adjacent residential uses.
Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly
identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are
located on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or
sensitive areas they shall be screened in the manner discussed above.
At the request of the auto dealers, staff recommends that S.5 be deleted. Staff has a level of
comfort that the result desired from this language can be accomplished through the minimum
standards required in S.l.a, S.1 .b.S.1 .c. and S.1 .d. These are minimum standards and can be
increased by the Director if it is deemed necessary to do so (i.e., buffering, screening, etc.).
Consistency with City's Design Guidelines
Upon approval of the proposed changes by the Planning Commission and City Council, staff will
determine if the changes may require modifications to the City's Design Guidelines. In the
event that modifications are required to the City's Design Guidelines, staff will bring them
forward to the Commission for their consideration. In the event that there is an inconsistency
prior to the Commission review, the Development Code standards will prevail.
R:\STAFFRI"I\297PA98.PC I 7/27/98 mf 3
Attachments:
Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A. Ordinance No. 98-__ - Blue Page 8
Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 13
Exhibits - Blue Page 21
R:NSTAFFRPTX297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
R:XSTAFFRPTX297PAgg. PCI 7/27/98 mf 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED:
'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF
THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE,
MOTORCYCLE AND TRUCK DEALERSHIPS
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code
and the Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County
Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109
(Zoning Amendment - Development Code), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, Planning Staff met with several concemed individuals regarding the proposed
modifications to the landscape standards for automobile, motorcycle and truck dealerships; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission re-considered this item under Planning Application
No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment - Development Cede), on August 5, 1998, at a duly noticed
public heating as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
R:\STAFFRPTX297PA98.PC 17/27/98 rnf 6
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S
DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR
AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE AND TRUCK DEALERSHIPS" THAT IS
SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT
A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of August,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
A YES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~TAFFRPT~297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 7
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT'x297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 8
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF
THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE,
MOTORCYCLE AND TRUCK DEALERSHIPS.
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan;
WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's
Devel6pment Code;
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend portions of the Development Code
and the Zoning Map;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County
Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0109
(Zoning Amendment - Development Code), on May 20, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, Planning Staff met with several concemed individuals regarding the proposed
modifications to the landscape standards for automobile, motorcycle and truck dealerships; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission re-considered this item under Planning Application
No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment - Development Code), on August 5, 1998, at a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heating, and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0297
(Zoning Amendment- Development Code); and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning
Amendment - Development Code), on , at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
R:\STAFFRPTX297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 9
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city;
B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health,
safety and welfare; and
ordinances.
That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local
Section 2. Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile Dealership Landscape Standards) is
hereby added to the Development Code and reads as follows:
"S. Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards.
Landscape Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new
automobile motorcycle and truck dealerships:
Display areas: a minimum five foot (5') wide landscape island shall be
required at the end of all display area lanes adjacent to the main entry drive
lane. A one foot strip, made of concrete or other materials acceptable to
the Community Development Director, shall be located next to the curb
immediately adjacent to the end display parking space. Said landscape
islands shall have a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover and shall have
automatic irrigation.
Street frontages. All portions of the property which have street frontage
shall meet one of the following criteria:
A minimum of twelve feet (12') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area; or
A minimum of twenty feet (20') of landscaping shall be provided,
measured from the rear of the sidewalk to the display area, with
display area allowed to encroach into eight (8) feet of the landscape
R:\STAFFRP'B297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 10
Display areas shall be paved with concrete, a maximum of
twenty (20) feet in length and shall be surrounded by low-
growing shrubs, groundcover and turf.
The number of display areas allowed shall be calculated in
the following manner: 3 display spaces per 100 linear feet
of street frontage. Fractional spaces (. 5 and over) shall be
rounded up.
No display area shall be located immediately adjacent to
another display area. Landscaping shall be provided
between display areas.
Development adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses. All
portions of the property which abut an existing or proposed residential use
shall have a minimum ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer.
All other portions of the property which do not abut a street or existing or
proposed residential uses shall have a minimum five foot (5') wide
landscape buffer.
All customer parking on the site shall be clearly identified, either through
special paint (i.e. curb painting) or signage and shall be subject to the
landscape requirements contained in Section 17.24.050.H of the
Development Code.
Buildings (i.e., showrooms, parts departments) which are accessible to the
public shall have landscaping adjacent to entrances to accomplish the
following: break up the building massing, break up large areas of
hardscape, provide visual interest and provide shade.
g,
Service bays shall not be visible from a public street and shall be adequately
screened from adjacent residential uses.
he
Inventory and vehicle-in-repair storage areas on the site shall be clearly
identified and will not need to be internally landscaped. If they are located
on the perimeter or adjacent to residential development or sensitive areas
they shall be screened in the manner discussed above."
Section 3. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that
although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a
Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
R:\STAFFRPT~97PAgg. PCI 7/27/98 mf 11
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The
City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption
of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish
a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __
day of ,
199 .
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199__, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPTX297PA98.PCl 7127/98mf 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\S'I'AFFRPTx297PA911.PCI 7/27/98mf 13
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose approval
is required:
Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment
- Development Code)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400
City-wide
Same as No. 2
Multiple designations
Multiple designations
An amendment to the City's Development Code, adding
Section 17.08.050.S. (Automobile, Motorcycle and Track
Dealership Landscape Standards)
N/A
None
R:~STAFFRPT~297PA98.PC 17/27/98 mf 14
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
[ ] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services
[ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ I Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
[X] None
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature Date
Printed Name
R:\STAFFRPIX297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 15
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or ~npacts from incompatible land uses)?
e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major mfi'astructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rupture?
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land?
h. Expansive soils?
I. Unique geologic or physical features?
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a.Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?
Potentially
Significant
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potenually
Significant
Units
l~tigation
Incorpm'ated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
NO
Impact
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[×]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
R:~STAFFRP'B297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 m.f 16
ISSUES AND
b.
SUPPORTiNG INFORMATION SOURCES
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding?
c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive reeeptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Potentially
Significant
Impaa
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
No
Impact
[x]
ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
R:~TAFFRPTx297PA98.PC17/27/98 mf ] 7
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts7
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripman and vernal pool)?
c. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8.ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
b.Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
Potentially
Significant
[]
[1
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Signlficam
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[l
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[x]
[x]
[x]
ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
ix]
Ix]
[x]
ix]
ix]
d,
e,
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[]
[]
[]
[x]
ix]
ix]
R:\STAFFRPTL297PA98.PCI 7/'27198 mf 18
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental services?
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[l
Impact
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
R:\STAFFRPTX297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 19
c. Affect historical resources?
[] [] [] [~
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
[] [] [] [~
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
Impact area?
[] [] [] [~
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
[] [] [] Ix]
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
[] [] [] [~
16. MANDATORY FlNDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the enviromnent, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the maj or periods of California history
or prehistory?
[1 [1 [1 [~
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
[] [1 [] [~
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? CCnmulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects uf other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
[1 [] [] [~
do
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
[1 [1 [] [x]
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None.
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Environmental Study, the proposed Amendment to the City's
Development Code will not have an impact to the environment in the following areas: Land Use and Planning,
Population and Housing, Geologic Problems, Water, Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological
Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems,
Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation. No mitigation measures will be required.
R:XSTAFFRPT',297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 mf 20
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:XSTAFFRP'I'X297PA98.PCI 7/27/98 m_f 2 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
SHRUB ACCENT AREAS
. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
$TRE
--6' WIDE SIDEWALK
PROPERTY LINE
12' LANDSCAPE FROM WALK
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(GROUPINGS OF ACCENT TREES,
SHRUBS, GROUND COVER AND TURF.)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0297
EXHIBIT 1 12' WIDE LANDSCAPE ZONE
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: AUGUST 5, 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA
SHRUB ACCENT AREAS
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
AUTOMOBILE DISPLAY PADS (,:5 PER 100 L.F.)
-- 6' WIDE SIDEWALK
STREET
PROPERTY LINE
20' LANDSCAPE FROM WALK
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(GROUPINGS OF ACCENT TREES,
SHRUBS, GROUND COVER AND TURF.)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0297
EXHIBIT 2 20' WIDE LANDSCAPE ZONE
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: AUGUST 5, 1998
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 5, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTN297pa98-ccl .doc
13
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 5, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:03
P.M., on Wednesday, August 5, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Naggar, Soltysiak, Webster, and Vice Chairman
Guerriero.
Absent:
Chairwoman Slaven.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Attorney Diaz,
Project Planner De Gange,
Associate Planner Fagan,
Assistant Planner Anders, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Chairwoman Slaven who was absent.
2. Approval of Minutes of June 3, 1998, June 17, 1998, July 1, 1998, and July 15, 1998
Due to the absence of Chairwoman Slaven, approval of the June 3, 1998, and June 17, 1998,
minutes was continued to the August 19, 1998, Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes of July 1, 1998. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Chairwoman Slaven who was absent.
Commissioner Naggar requested to amend the minutes of July 15, 1998, regarding page 5,
paragraph 5, to reflect that he concurred with the comments of Chairwoman Slaven in regard to
the Overlay Zone. Due to the absence of Chairwoman Slaven, approval of these minutes was
continued to the August 19, 1998, Planning Commission meeting.
3. Director s Hearing Update
No additional comments.
Revision of Elevations and Site Plan for the Power Center (Planning Application No.
PA97-0118, located on the southwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads)
Assistant Planner Fagan presented the staff report (of record) and reviewed the changes to the
previously approved site plan, as well as the elevations; advised that the intent of the additional 2'
of landscaping was as a result of the developer requesting to delete a row of parking in the back
and relocate the buildings closer to Margadta Road; and therefore, staff requested more depth into
the landscape setback. In terms of screening of the loading areas, Mr. Fagan reviewed measures
to achieve this goal, noting the berm will be retained.
By way of the originally approved plans, Mr. David Rhodes of Excel Architects, representing the
applicant, reviewed the site plan modifications, advising that this request is before the Planning
Commission as a potential site plan; that it is not final because the tenant has not signed the deal;
and that it can't be signed without Planning Commission approval; relayed no objection to the
additional 2' of landscaping as per staff recommendation, in order to provide dense landscaping
along Margarita Road to further screen the truck loading dock; and advised that because of secudty
concerns the applicant would not be desirous of the Planning Department's recommendation to
construct a 6' foot high wall, due to security concerns. With regard to Commissioner Naggar's
comments concerning parking, Mr. Rhodes clarified that parking was reduced from 287 parking
stalls to 268, but that the overall square footage was reduced.
Vice Chairman Guerriero reiterated his desire to ensure solid and dense landscaping along
Margarita Road, specifically the area between Winchester Road 'and North General Kearny Road,
where the elevations are at street level.
Commissioner Soltysiak suggested that staff review the relationship of the meandering sidewalk
and the berm to ensure the effects of the berm will not be reduced.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's comments with regard to landscaping, he recommended
the construction of a solid wall if there could be no assurance that the truck loading area would be
obscured. Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that staff will address his concern.
Commissioner Webster commended the proposed changes, citing the revision as an improved
proposal which will break up the mass of the buildings and provide visual interest, recommending
that this, or a similar site plan be used as a final plan.
Following the review of the proposed revisions, it was the consensus of the Commission to concurr
with staff recommendation to direct staff to make a determination of substantial conformance with
the previously approved Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Elevations for Planning Application No.
PA97-0118 (Development Plan - Regional Mall); and to direct staff to require the applicant to
submit an Administrative Development Plan for the modifications.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. Planning Application NO. PA98-0046 (Development Plan)
A request for Elevations and Landscape Plan approval for a 126,328 square foot
JC Penney Department Store
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
By way of overheads, Associate Planner Fagan presented the staff report (of record) and reviewed
the proposed landscape and elevation plans for consistency with the previously approved JC
Penney footprint.
Mr. David Hoffman, representing the applicant, informed the Commissioners that he was present
and available to answer any questions. Mr. Hoffman praised Associate Planner Fagan and staff
on a job well done.
Vice Chairman Guerriero commended the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public headng; adopt Resolution No. 98-028,
approving Planning Application No. PA98-0046 (Development Plan) based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0046,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN - THE ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPE
PLANS FOR A 126,328 SQUARE FOOT JC PENNEY DEPARTMENT
STORE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
AND YNEZ ROADS.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote of those present reflected
unanimous approval with the exception of Chairwoman Slaven who was absent.
6. Planning Application No, PA98-0149 (Development Plan)
A request to construct two 8,570 square foot industrial buildings on two 0.58 acre
parcels.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
Project Planner De Gange presented an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material)
addressing access, circulation, architecture and landscaping, noting that staff and the applicant
have worked closely together on the site design. In response to Commissioner Webster's
comment, Mr. De Gange clarified that the existing and surrounding zoning was incorrectly indicated
in the staff report and the actual zoning is Light Industrial.
In an effort to resolve the Commissioners' concern with regard to the setback and screening, Mr.
James Horecka, representing the applicant, explained the challenges of the project such as, the
easements, the small size of the lots, and meeting the development Code criteria; noted that to
maximize the building space, a zero foot setback (as zoning permits) was utilized at the front of the
buildings, mitigating the negative aesthetic effect through adding landscaping for screening, adding
articulation to break up building's mass and enhancing the interest; and noted that the adjacent
parcels, will be developed by Mr. Alfred the applicant, as economics permit. Mr. Horecka thanked
staff for their input on the project.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's request Mr. Horecka advised the applicant would be willing
to add landscape buffering on the adjacent property (owned by applicant) on an interim basis.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff will address landscape buffering with the contract
landscape architect.
With regard to Commissioner Soltysiak's concern, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
elaborated on the drainage easement for flood control purposes, clarifying that the applicant has
voluntarily installed a storm drain which has not yet been accepted by the City; noted that the City
has received the plans and approved them; and advised that staff would review future impact within
the easement in this area.
In light of explanations provided, Commissioner Webster noted his satisfaction with the setbacks
on this particular project.
In response to Commissioner Naggar's querying with regard to the allowable zero foot setback for
industrial buildings, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified this provision as an option for maximizing
building size due to the constraints of square footage of the buildings and other Development Code
criteria (FAR, parking and landscaping limits,); and concurred with Commissioner Webster's
recommendation to add a paragraph, addressing zero foot setbacks, in the Design Guidelines of
Industrial Buildings.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; to adopt the Negative
Declaration with a Finding of DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA98-0149; to adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0149; and to adopt Resolution
No. 98-029 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
Conditions of Approval, amended as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0149
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN), THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
TWO 8,570 SQUARE FOOT BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT 0.58 ACRE PARCELS,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BLACKDEER LOOP, WEST OF DIAZ
ROAD (43095 AND 43135 BLACKDEER LOOP), AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO.'S 909-030-014 AND 909-030-015
Add
additional landscaping to the adjacent lot on an interim basis, as per staffs
recommendation
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice reflected unanimous vote approval
with the exception of Chairwoman Slaven who was absent.
7. Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment, Development Code)
Request to amend the City's Development Code, adding Section 17.08.050.S
(Automobile, Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards) to the
Development Code.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
By way of photographs, Associate Planner Fagan presented the staff report (per agenda material)
reviewing the proposed recommendations, and clarifying staffs rationale based on meetings with
the auto dealers.
For Commissioner Naggar, with regard to the disparity of existing frontages, Associate Planner
Fagan advised that the intent of the amended Code would be to establish conformity on new
applications for car dealerships.
Further addressing the proposed revisions, Mr. Vincent Didonato, architect representing the auto
dealers, clarified unique considerations of auto dealers as to landscaping standards, as follows:
- that most of the auto dealership business is completed in the parking lot;
that shade trees in the display area cause maintenance problems;
that that the service parking lot not have the same landscape standards as the
customer parking lot.
Mr. Didonato commended Mr. Fagan and staff for the great work on the project.
Commissioners Webster and Soltysiak suggested deleting Item 2 f., advising that the language with
regard to Landscape Design Guidelines adequately addresses the issue of landscaping.
With regard to Commissioner Webster's querying of the term "new" in section 1, Planning Manager
Ubnoske clarified that an existing dealership making substantial alterations, with extensive
modifications, would be required by staff to submit a new application, and would then be governed
by the new proposed standards.
For aesthetic purposes, Commissioner Webster recommended that specific language be added
to provide a mixture of landscape (shrubs, ground cover and turf) versus landscaping with just
grass.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; to adopt the Negative
Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0297 (Zoning Amendment, Development Code); and
to adopt Resolution No. 98-030 based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report, amended
as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR
AUTOMOBILE, MOTORCYCLE AND TRUCK DEALERSHIPS.
Add
requiring a mixture of landscape (low growing shrubs, ground cover, and turf)
language to Item 1. to clarify substantial modifications or remodeling
encompasses the application of conformance to the amended Landscape
Requirements
Delete
- Section 2 f. (landscaping pertaining to buildings accessible to the public)
The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Guerdero and voice vote of those present reflected
unanimous approval with the exception of Chairwoman Slaven who was absent.
At 7:45 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting was reconvened at 7:50 P.M.
8. Planning Application No. PA98-0171 (Tentative Tract Map)
Request to subdivide 20.83 acres into 141 detached condominium lots, as well as
product review for the condominium elevations and project landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
Commissioner Webster noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this project.
By way of overheads, Associate Planner Anders presented a detailed overview of staff report (per
agenda material); commended the applicant, Mr. Howard Omdahl, on efforts undertaken to address
and mitigate the concerns of the adjacent homeowners; clarified that although staff recommended
the addition of a pool or recreation room, the applicant was under the opinion that additional
amenities would render Association fees too high.
With regard to Commissioner Naggar's comments, Mr. Howard Omdahl, the applicant, clarified that
although originally the adjacent homeowners requested a block wall, they seemed to be satisfied
with the installation of a new wood fence.
For Robin Findl, 21225 Humber Drive, representing the adjacent homeowners, advised that the
homeowners were in agreement with the proposed project dependent on the following changes:
- that the existing fence would be replaced with a new wood fence;
- that the pad elevations on the perimeter of the project would not be graded higher
than the current grade;
- that the parks will not have bright lights or barbecues;
- that there will be added 24" boxed trees between existing homes and proposed
condominium projects.
In response to Mr. Robert VanKirk's (4176 Humber Drive) specific concerns with regard to
landscaping bordering his property, Mr. Vince Didonato, landscape architect, stated that the tree
landscaping will be implemented as follows:
- that trees will be clustered to provide a view pocket;
- that screening for privacy would be insured;
7
that the use of evergreen-type trees (specifially not deciduous trees with a lot of
leaves) would be used for easier maintenance of his pool.
Mr. VanKirk stated that Mr. Omdahl has been wonderful to work with.
For Dr. Urie, owner of Parcel No. 8, it was noted, by Mr. Mecklenburg, that at the toe of the slope
a concrete V-ditch storm drain will be installed to handle the flows.
Addressing Mr. John M. Mecklenburg's concerns, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised
that Condition No. 41 (bus bay) will be deleted; clarified that staff would not object to crediting the
applicant for the Development Impact Fee with regard to half of the raised landscape median, and
adding that as a part of the Conditions.
Mr. Mecklenburg thanked staff for their helpfulness on the project, stating that it has been a
pleasure working with the City.
Further elaborating on the landscaping, Mr. Vincent Didonato, clarified that 24-inch box trees
provide instant impact, but they won't grow to the intensity of a '15-gallon or a 5-gallon tree;
therefore, the eventual screening impact of a smaller tree has better impact; and stated that there
will be 24-inch box trees planted where the slopes change height.
In light of the detailed discussions, Mr. VanKirk and Ms. Findl relayed satisfaction with the proposed
plans, and it was the consensus of the Commission that any further input could be addressed to
the applicant through staff.
Commissioner Naggar expressed enthusiasm over the project, commending the change in the
density (allowable 12 units per acre to 7 units per acre).
Commissioner Soltysiak commended the project as a tremendous improvement over the last
proposed project.
With regard to the Commissioner's traffic concems, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified
that Margarita Road will be widened to 110' wide, with two lanes in each direction with a raised
median; that there is adequate stacking distance, in and out of both directions, as well as on
Margarita Road; clarified that there will be signalized crosswalks at the school sites; and advised
that the acceleration lane will be addressed while reviewing the median design.
Vice Chairman Guerriero requested that the deletion of Condition No. 41 be discussed with the
School District.
Although not making it a condition of this project, Vice Chairman Guerriero expressed concern with
cut-through traffic to the adjoining neighborhood, and requested that traffic studies be completed
on Avenue Barca and Humber Drive.
Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested to address the general area's traffic impacts, not solely this
project.
In response to Vice Chairman Guerriero's request that additional amenities be provided, Mr.
Mecklenburg advised that his goal was to make the project as affordable as possible.
Commissioner Sotysiak voiced support of the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to close public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration
for Planning Application No. PA98-0171; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No PA98-0171; and adopt Resolution No. 98-031 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, amended as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO, PC 98-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO PA98-0171
(TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28850) TO SUBDIVIDE A 20.83 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 141 CONDOMINIUM UNITS INCLUDING PRODUCT
REVIEW AND PROJECT LANDSCAPING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD, BETWEEN AVENIDA SONOMA AND
AVENIDA BARCA AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-
370-004
Delete
Condition No. 41 (conditions set forth by the Department of Public Works)
Add
adding language to Condition No. 30.a (clarifying the crediting to applicant
for development impact fee for half of the raised landscape median)
adding language to Condition No. 8 ( to require the construction of a pool or
recreation room to the amenities)
that there will be no pad elevation changes along the perimeter of the
project
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote of those present reflected
unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Webster who abstained and Chairwoman
Slaven who was absent.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
No additional comments.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
A. Commissioner Naggar clarified, in response to phone calls he had received, and media
reports that at the July 15, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, with regard to the
recommendation for approval of the Ordinance for Sexually Oriented Businesses, no major
changes were proposed; that the proposed Permanent Ordinance will replace the Interim
Ordinance which will elapse in October of 1998, and would basically maintain the status quo of
those regulations which have been in existence for the past 11/2 years.
B. For Vice Chairman Webster, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified that the City-
wide traffic program had been activated, but that after the bereavement absence of the Traffic
Engineer, it would be further addressed.
C. Vice Chairman Guerriero requested that staff address contractors working in trenches
without shoring. In response to Mr. Guerriero, with regard to re-fencing the Mall property after
grading, Deputy Director of Public Parks clarified that open areas, areas with building structures,
and all trenches would be fenced.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:56 P.M., Vice Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, August
19, 1998, at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Marcia Slaven, Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~297pa98-ccl .doc
14
CITY OF TEMECULA
STREET
6' WIDE SIDEWALK
PROPERTY LINE
12' LANDSCAPE FROM WALK
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(GROUPINGS OF ACCENT TREES,
SHRUBS, GROUND COVER AND TURF.)
CASE NO. - PA98-0297
EXHIBIT- A
CITY COUNCIL DATE - SEPTEMBER 8, 1998
TWELVE FOOT (12') WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
CITY OF TEMECULA
6' WIDE SIDEWALK
PROPERTY LINE
20' LANDSCAPE FROM WALK
TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(GROUPINGS OF ACCENT TREES,
STREET ~. ~o~ ~o~ ~ ~.>
CASE NO. - PA98-0297
EXHIBIT - B TWENTY FOOT (20') WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - SEPTEMBER 8, 1998
ITEM 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
September 8, 1998
A Professional Services Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates to Perform
Services to Prepare a Market Study and Feasibility Analysis for a
Convention/Conference Facility in Temecula
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Council direct the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services
Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates to Prepare a Market Study and Feasibility
Analysis for a Convention/Conference Facility in Temecula in an amount of $34,000.
(2)
Appropriate $34,000 (contract amount of $31,500 plus estimated expenses of $2,500)
from General Fund unreserved fund balance to the Economic Development Department
consulting budget.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several years there has been increasing interest by the City in the possibility of
locating a convention/conference facility in Temecula. More recently, representatives from the
hotel industry have contacted staff and expressed similar interest in the City as familiarity with
Temecula as a destination site has grown.
During our initial meetings, staff determined that although preliminary information and intuition
indicate there is a market for a small to mid size convention/conference center here, we need
more detailed information in order for the Council to make further decisions. Consequently,
Requests For Proposals (RFPs) were sent to seven (7) firms that specialize in this type of
analysis and were designed to help answer the following questions:
· Is there a market for a convention/conference facility?
· What size (if feasible) facility can the area accommodate?
· What areas in the community would be the most appropriate for this type of facility?
· What subsidies, if any, would be required to make the project feasible?
r:~bradley~agenda98~convention.rpt
Three firms responded to our Request for Proposals. They are:
· Keyser Marston Associates
· PKF Consulting
· Price Waterhouse Coopers
$31,500'
$50,000*
$76,500*
*all proposed prices are plus expenses.
The San Diego office of Keyser Marston Associates submitted the lowest proposed budget for
the project and is prepared to start work on approval of their contract. Their scope of services
(reference Attachment No. 1 ) includes the following components:
Phase
1
1. Convention/Conference/Meeting Facilities Market Demand
2. Lodging Market Demand
3. Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations - Convention/Conference Facility
Phase
II
1. Site Alternative Analysis
2. Financial Feasibility Analysis
3. Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Keyser Marston has satisfactorily performed previous work for the City and staff has a positive
working relationship with the firm. Staff recommends selection of Keyser Marston Associates
for this assignment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
An appropriation of $34,000 from the General Fund unreserved fund balance to the Economic
Development Department consulting line item is required to fund this contract.
Attachments:
1. Scope of Services - Page 3
2. Professional Services Agreement
R :~bradley'agenda98~convention. rpt 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
R:\STAFFRPT\IKeyser Marston Convention - Conference PSA 08/28/98 klb ~3
CONVENTION/CONFERENCE FACILITY
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following scope of services has been designed to address the questions articulated in the
RFP. Phase I is a market feasibility analysis of convention/conference facilities with and
without a new lodging component or hotel. Phase I will conclude on the market feasibility
parameters, including site requirements. If the conclusions are positive, a development
program will be recommended. Phase II will address financial feasibility issues, including the
necessity of subsidy. Alternative potential sites will be evaluated, both in terms of cost and
ability to positively impact the Old Town area. Other costs and benefits of developing the
recommended facility will also be summarized.
Phase !
A. Convention/Conference/Meeting Facilities Market Demand
Inventory the existing meeting and assembly type facilities in the local market
area that are catering to the activity that currently exists. Determine size of
facility, layout, markets or types of meetings and events served, etc.
Research the number and types of meeting activities with respect to size of
event (number of attendees), space needs by types of spaces, seasonal and
day of the week aspects, audio-visual, food and beverage service, and rate
sensitivity.
Review and assess the local and regional business base and the potential for
generating conference/meeting business. Contact and interview businesses
that appear to have a high potential for generating demand and ascertain their
needs and potential. High tech industry and particularly software development
firms have been found particularly likely to have meeting facility space needs.
Review and assess local clubs, associations, and non-profit organizations to'
determine their ability to contribute to the utilization of a convention/conference
facility. The role of the local wine industry will also be evaluated for its ability to
generate utilization of a conference facility.
Survey regional meeting and events planners to determine potential interest in
Temecula from a larger market area
Conclude on the market feasibility of a convention/conference/meeting facilities
without a lodging component. Assess the degree to which existing lodging
could serve to meet the needs of a meeting facility.
99\99900\900a-665.doc
Page I
B. Lodging Market Demand
Inventory and evaluate the existing lodging facilities, including rate structure,
amenity levels, location, etc. Conduct site visits and interview management of
selected properties. Identify markets served (business, recreational) and day of
the week usage and seasonal patterns.
Analyze the performance of the local lodging market in terms of occupancy
levels and room rates achieved. Examine historic trends and project future
potential based on economic conditions and known additions to the local hotel
room supply.
Identify the market segmentation of the local lodging market (commercial, group
business, leisure) and the growth rate for each sector of the market. Project
room night demand based on the growth of each sector.
Survey local businesses and organizations as part of Tasks A 3 and 4 above for
their profile of lodging needs with and without a conference facility.
Determine the contribution of annual room nights that the presence of a
conference center facility would add to a hotel's annual occupancy requirement.
Conclude on the market feasibility for a new lodging facility in Temecula with
and without a conference facility. The room rate and occupancy level
achievable will be estimated.
Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations - Convention/Conference
Facility
Summarize conclusions with respect to the market feasibility of conference
center facilities and lodging.
Recommend the size and type of operation and provide a development
program - number of rooms, number of stories, site size, amenities, food and
beverage component. Identify representative chains or other city facilities as
models. The size and configuration of the conference center will also be
recommended including the size of the largest space or ball room, smaller
meeting rooms, breakout rooms and food and beverage arrangement. It is
noted that more than one option for a conference center may be possible from
a market perspective.
Identify site requirements and criteria with respect to location, access and other
characteristics.
99\99900\900a-665,doc Page 2
Phase fi
Before proceeding with Phase II, we recommend a meeting (or conference call) with the City
to discuss options which may be present for the Phase II analysis. Also the site evaluation
task should proceed based on input from the City. It is expected that the City will assist in
identifying potential sites or may have sites which they want especially considered.
A. Site Alternatives Evaluation
Inspect and evaluate alternative sites for the development of the recommended
facility. Provide an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the
major candidate sites and rate them based on criteria that takes into account
marketability factors and City objectives.
B. Financial Feasibility Analysis
Prepare an operating projection for the recommended facility that takes into
account room rate and occupancy level for a five-year period. Operating
expenses and net operating income will be projected on a pro forma basis.
Develop a pro forma summary of total development costs, including estimates
of building shell costs, furniture fixtures and equipment, and all indirect or soft
costs. Depending on the outcome of the site evaluation and the direction from
the City, also include a site assembly cost.
Determine the ability of the net operating income to support the investment
necessary to build the recommended facility
Identify if public assistance or subsidy is required and if so, some conceptual
ways such assistance could be structured.
C. Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Summarize the fiscal costs and benefits of developing the recommended
facility. Fiscal benefits will include transient occupancy tax, sales tax, property
tax and other direct revenues.
Summarize other economic benefits including number of jobs created, and
visitor impacts. Visitor impacts refer to dollars spent by non-residents in local
businesses such as restaurants, shops, and services.
Present an overview of the secondary impacts, or multiplier effect of the visitor
dollar expenditures.
Summarize other more qualitative benefits of having the recommended facility
located in the City, or on specific sites if appropriate.
99\99900\900a-665.doc Page 3
PRODUCTS, MEETINGS, BUDGET, AND TIMING
Product
The principal product of this work program will be a report complete with tables and graphics
presenting the key information and findings. It will be more cost effective to present the Phase
I findings in capsule or outline form with selected tables and then produce the full report
containing both phases at the end of the work program.
Meetings
This proposal envisions up to three meetings with staff- a kick off meeting, an interim
preliminary findings meeting, and a meeting at the end to discuss the final report. One of the
meetings could be exchanged for a presentation to Council or other public group. We would
be pleased to attend additional meetings or otherwise revise this portion of the proposal to
meet your needs.
Budget
Phase l
A. Convention/Conference Facilities Market Demand $8,000
B. Lodging Market Demand $6,500
C. Market Summary and Recommendations $2.500
Subtotal $17,000
Phase II
A.
B.
C.
Report Preparation
Meeting
Total
Site Alternatives Evaluation
Financial Feasibility Analysis
Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Subtotal
$2,500
$4,000
$2.000
$8,500
$2,000
$4,000
$31,500
An hourly fee schedule is provided at the end of this brochure. The hourly rate for Jay Scott is
the same as the rate for a KMA Senior Principal.
Timing
The Phase I analysis can be completed in 60 days or by the end of October; the Phase II
analysis will require 30 days following authorization to proceed. The final report preparation
will require two weeks.
99\99900\900a-665.doc Page 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
(MARKET STUDY & FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR A
CONVENTION/CONFERENCE FACILITY IN TEMECULA)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of September 9, 1998, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Keyser Marston Associates, ("Consultant"). In consideration
of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on September 9, 1998, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31,
1998, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set tbrth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks
according to the schedule of performance which is also set tbrth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times ti~ithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, pertbrm all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ,
at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not
exceed Thirty-four Thousand Dollars and no cents ($34,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its
performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set tbrth herein, unless such additional services
are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any
additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time
City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager
may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event
shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall
be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly/br actual services performed. Invoices shall
be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, tbr services provided in the previous month.
Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City
disputes any of consultant' s fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice
of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-1-
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Consultant the actual value of the work pertbrmed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant
will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City
shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date
of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure
by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the
Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written
notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory pertbrmance. In the event that the Consultant tails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs,
expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under
this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit
an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free
access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give
City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom
as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3)
years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement,
all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents
prepared in the course of providing the services to be perthtreed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the
sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission
of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable
written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware tbr purposes of accessing,
compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
-2-
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable
for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified
in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims/br injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the perforn~ance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of Calitbrnia and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other foran with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Empioyer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
-3-
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are
to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consuitant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City beti~re work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements eft~cting the coverage required by these specifications.
-4-
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all
times be under Consultant' s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees
or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that
it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City,
or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out
of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the
City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support,
testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other inti~rmation concerning the work performed
under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena
or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order
or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for
documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from
any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or
property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or
be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City
and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant.
However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct,
or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set ti~rth below or at any other address as that
party may later designate by Notice:
-5-
To City:
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
Suite 715
1660 Hotel Circle North
San Diego, CA 92108
Attention: Paul Marra
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City.
Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Paul Marra
shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Paul Marra may use assistants, under their direct
supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen
(14) days' notice prior to the departure of Paul Marra from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave
Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3)
days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation
shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have
in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws
of the State of California shall govern the rights, ob[igations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement
shall take place in the municipal, superior, or t~deral district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City
of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party
as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney t~es and litigation costs incurred
in the litigation.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into
this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based
solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any
and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance
of its obligations hereunder.
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES. INC.
By
By:
-7-
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
CONVENTION/CONFERENCE FACILITY
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following scope of services has been designed to address the questions articulated in the
RFP. Phase I is a market feasibility analysis of convention/conference facilities with and
without a new lodging component or hotel. Phase I will conclude on the market feasibility
parameters, including site requirements. If the conclusions are positive, a development
program will be recommended. Phase II will address financial feasibility issues, including the
necessity of subsidy. Alternative potential sites will be evaluated, both in terms of cost and
ability to positively impact the Old Town area. Other costs and benefits of developing the
recommended facility will also be summarized.
Phase I
A. Convention/Conference/Meeting Facilities Market Demand
Inventory the existing meeting and assembly type facilities in the local market
area that are catering to the activity that currently exists. Determine size of
facility, layout, markets or types of meetings and events served, etc.
Research the number and types of meeting activities with respect to size of
event (number of attendees), space needs by types of spaces, seasonal and
day of the week aspects, audio-visual, food and beverage service, and rate
sensitivity.
o
Review and assess the local and regional business base and the potential for
generating conference/meeting business. Contact and interview businesses
that appear to have a high potential for generating demand and ascertain their
needs and potential. High tech industry and particularly software development
firms have been found particularly likely to have meeting facility space needs.
Review and assess local clubs, associations, and non-profit organizations to
determine their ability to contribute to the utilization of a convention/conference
facility. The role of the local wine industry will also be evaluated for its ability to
generate utilization of a conference facility.
Survey regional meeting and events planners to determine potential interest in
Temecula from a larger market area
Conclude on the market feasibility of a convention/conference/meeting facilities
without a lodging component. Assess the degree to which existing lodging
could serve to meet the needs of a meeting facility.
99\99900\900a-665.doc Page 1
B. Lodging Market Demand
Inventory and evaluate the existing lodging facilities, including rate structure,
amenity levels, location, etc. Conduct site visits and interview management of
selected properties. identify markets served (business, recreational) and day of
the week usage and seasonal patterns.
Analyze the performance of the local lodging market in terms of occupancy
levels and room rates achieved. Examine historic trends and project future
potential based on economic conditions and known additions to the local hotel
room supply.
Identify the market segmentation of the local lodging market (commercial, group
business, leisure) and the growth rate for each sector of the market. Project
room night demand based on the growth of each sector·
Survey local businesses and organizations as part of Tasks A 3 and 4 above for
their profile of lodging needs with and without a conference facility.
Determine the contribution of annual room nights that the presence of a
conference center facility would add to a hotel's annual occupancy requirement.
Conclude on the market feasibility for a new lodging facility in Temecula with
and without a conference facility. The room rate and occupancy level
achievable will be estimated.
Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations - Convention/Conference
Facility
Summarize conclusions with respect to the market feasibility of conference
center facilities and lodging·
Recommend the size and type of operation and provide a development
program - number of rooms, number of stories, site size, amenities, food and
beverage component. Identify representative chains or other city facilities as
models. The size and configuration of the conference center will also be
recommended including the size of the largest space or ball room, smaller
meeting rooms, breakout rooms and food and beverage arrangement. It is
noted that more than one option for a conference center may be possible from
a market perspective.
Identify site requirements and criteria with respect to location, access and other
characteristics.
99\99900\900a-665.doc Page 2
Phase
Before proceeding with Phase II, we recommend a meeting (or conference call) with the City
to discuss options which may be present for the Phase II analysis. Also the site evaluation
task should proceed based on input from the City. It is expected that the City will assist in
identifying potential sites or may have sites which they want especially considered.
A. Site Alternatives Evaluation
Inspect and evaluate alternative sites for the development of the recommended
facility. Provide an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the
major candidate sites and rate them based on criteria that takes into account
marketability factors and City objectives.
B. Financial Feasibility Analysis
Prepare an operating projection for the recommended facility that takes into
account room rate and occupancy level for a five-year period. Operating
expenses and net operating income will be projected on a pro forma basis.
Develop a pro forma summary of total development costs, including estimates
of building shell costs, furniture fixtures and equipment, and all indirect or soft
costs. Depending on the outcome of the site evaluation and the direction from
the City, also include a site assembly cost.
Determine the ability of the net operating income to support the investment
necessary to build the recommended facility
Identify if public assistance or subsidy is required and if so, some conceptual
ways such assistance could be structured.
C. Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Summarize the fiscal costs and benefits of developing the recommended
facility. Fiscal benefits will include transient occupancy tax, sales tax, property
tax and other direct revenues.
Summarize other economic benefits including number of jobs created, and
visitor impacts. Visitor impacts refer to dollars spent by non-residents in local
businesses such as restaurants, shops, and services.
Present an overview of the secondary impacts, or multiplier effect of the visitor
dollar expenditures.
Summarize other more qualitative benefits of having the recommended facility
located in the City, or on specific sites if appropriate.
99\99900\900a-665.doc Page 3
PRODUCTS, MEETINGS, BUDGET, AND TIMING
Product
The principal product of this work program will be a report complete with tables and graphics
presenting the key information and findings. It will be more cost effective to present the Phase
I findings in capsule or outline form with selected tables and then produce the full report
containing both phases at the end of the work program.
Meetings
This proposal envisions up to three meetings with staff- a kick off meeting, an interim
preliminary findings meeting, and a meeting at the end to discuss the final report. One of the
meetings could be exchanged for a presentation to Council or other public group. We would
be pleased to attend additional meetings or otherwise revise this portion of the proposal to
meet your needs.
Budget
Phase I
A. Convention/Conference Facilities Market Demand $8,000
B. Lodging Market Demand $6,500
C. Market Summary and Recommendations $2.500
Subtotal $17,000
Phase II
A.
B.
C.
Report Preparation
Meeting
Total
Site Alternatives Evaluation
Financial Feasibility Analysis
Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Subtotal
$2,500
$4,000
$2.000
$8,500
$2,000
$4,000
$31,500
An hourly fee schedule is provided at the end of this brochure. The hourly rate for Jay Scott is
the same as the rate for a KMA Senior Principal.
Timing
The Phase I analysis can be completed in 60 days or by the end of October; the Phase II
analysis will require 30 days following authorization to proceed. The final repor~ preparation
will require two weeks.
99\99900\900a-665,doc Page 4
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Phase I
Convention/Conference Facilities Market Demand
Lodging Market Demand
Market Summary and Recommendations
Subtotal
$8,000
$6,500
$2,500
$17,000
Phase II
A,
Site Alternatives Evaluation
Financial Feasibility Analysis
Public Costs and Benefits Summary
Subtotal
$2,50O
$8,500
Report Preparation
Meeting
Total
$2,000
$31,500*
* plus expenses
-9-
ITEM 15
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Councilmembers
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
September 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition in
Eminent Domain of Property for Community Facilities in the Old Town Area
(Temecula Mercantile Building)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Consider adoption of proposed Resolution No. 98- , a Resolution of
Necessity of the City of Temecula Declaring Certain Real Property Necessary for Public
Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition thereof in connection with the Old Town Area
Community Facilities.
2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution
of Necessity, receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this report, take testimony
from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C and D below, and consider all of the
evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution, which requires a unanimous
or 4/5ths vote.
3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and
referred to in this report, the testimony and comments received in this hearing, that the evidence
warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolution of Necessity, then the
staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt proposed
Resolution No. 98- (which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and the following
authorize that an eminent domain proceeding be filed to acquire the subject property interests:
RESOLUTION NO. 98
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION
WITH COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN THE OLD TOWN AREA
(TEMECULA MERCANTILE BUILDING)
R:coheem\eminentdom. 1
4. Authorize the City Attorney's Office to file eminent domain proceedings in
the Superior Court of Riverside County.
BACKGROUND: The Old Town Area of the City is generally located within the boundaries
of Rancho California Road on the north, the Temecula Valley Freeway (Interstate 15) on the
East, Santiago Road and First Street on the south, and Pujol Street on the west. This area is
the subject of the Old Town Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on February 8, 1994 by
Resolution No. 94-13 and Ordinance No. 94-05. The Old Town Specific Plan provides for land
use and development standards, design guidelines, traffic improvements, infrastructure
improvements, and capital projects for the Old Town Area as well as describing methodologies
for economic revitalization of the Old Town Area. The Specific Plan encourages development of
parking areas, preservation of historical structures, and development of parks, city offices,
senior citizen centers, museums, community centers and libraries.
The Subject Property is located at 42049 Main Street and more specifically
described in Exhibit 1 of proposed Resolution No. 98- The Subject Property is
designated as one of the historic structures in the Old Town Area being built in 1902 and is
known as the "Burnham Store" on said map and is also known as the "Temecula Mercantile."
Recluired Findings
To adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and
determine that:
A. The public interest and necessity require the Project;
B. The Project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible
with the greatest public good and least private injury;
C. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolution of Necessity
are necessary for the Project;
D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been
made to the owner of record of the property sought to be acquired.
The proposed Resolution of Necessity for the Subject Property is attached to this
Agenda Report.
This hearing relates to issues A, B, C and D above.
A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project
As shown by the Old Town Specific Plan cited above, the development of the Old
Town Area depends upon the acquisition of property for public parking and the development of
community facilities such as parks, city offices, senior citizen centers, museums, community
centers and libraries as well as the preservation of historical structures. The Temecula
Mercantile Building or Burnham Store, as the subject property is sometimes known, offers
unique opportunities for implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. The property can support
approximately six (6) public parking spaces to the rear. It is large enough to support many
types of community facilities including a small museum, library, or senior citizens center.
Additionally, the building is a historical structure which can be preserved under City ownership.
R:coheem\eminentdom. 2
B. The Project is Planned in the Manner that will be Compatible with the Greatest
Public Good and Least Private Injury
The studies, plans and other documents cited above also evidence that the use
of the Subject Property for public parking and the development of community facilities such as
parks, city offices, senior citizen centers, museums, community centers and libraries as well as
the preservation of historical structures is planned and located to provide the best practical
solution to address the stated planning goals of the General Plan and the Old Town Specific
Plan.
C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolution of Necessity are
Necessary for the Project
The proposed acquisition of the subject property interests described in the
Resolution is necessary for the Project as planned and designed. The Subject Property offers
unique opportunities for implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. The property can support
approximately six (6) public parking spaces to the rear. It is large enough to support many
types of community facilities including a small museum, library, or senior citizens center.
Additionally, the building is a historical structure which can be preserved under City ownership.
D. The Offer Required By Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to
the Owner of Record of the Property Sought to be Acquired
Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair
market value appraisal of the subject property interests, set just compensation in accordance
with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer letter to Lorraine Clark, owner
of record of the Subject Property, on July 30, 1998. A true and correct copy of the offer letter is
on file in the City Manager's Office and is incorporated in this report by this reference. The
owner of record and the City have engaged in further negotiations.
Adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity requires at least a four/fifths
(4/5) vote of the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for the proposed acquisitions through the
City's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Capital Improvement Fund.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 98-
R:coheem\eminentdom. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN
CONNECTION WITH COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN
THE OLD TOWN AREA (TEMECULA MERCANTILE
BUILDING)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temecula is a municipal corporation in the County of
Riverside, State of California.
Section 2. The real property described generally in Section 3 of this Resolution
and more particularly described in Exhibit 1 of this Resolution ("Subject Property"), is to be
taken for a public use, namely for community facilities in the Old Town Area, and all purposes
necessary or convenient thereto, pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Temecula by
eminent domain by California Constitution Article I Section 19, and California Government Code
Sections 37350, 37350.5, 40401, 40403 and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure
Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050; and 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.160, 1240.410,
1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law.
Section 3. The Subject Property sought to be taken is located in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is identified by Assessors Parcel
Number 922-036-020. The Subject Property sought to be taken is more particularly described
in Exhibit 1 to this Resolution, which are incorporated by this reference.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds and determines that:
A. The acquisition of the Subject Property is required for the Old Town
community facilities ("the Project"). A general description of the Project is set forth in the
Agenda Report dated September 8, 1998 and the reports and documents cited in that Report,
which are all incorporated in this Resolution by this reference.
B. The potential impacts of the acquisition of the Subject Property were
analyzed in connection with the analysis of the Old Town Specific Plan. On February 22, 1994,
the City of Temecula adopted Resolution 94-05 approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration
regarding the Old Town Specific Plan. Notice of determination thereof was duly filed. Pursuant
to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 15162, et seq., the findings made in
connection with the said Mitigated Negative Declaration, are the appropriate findings with regard
to the acquisition of the Subject Property. The environmental documentation prepared in
connection with these actions has been duly reviewed and the Council hereby determines that
no significant changes in the Project or in the environment, and no new information had been
obtained which would require further environmental analysis with respect to the acquisition of
the Subject Property. The acquisition of the Subject Property will not have a significant effect on
the environment.
R:resos\98-
Section 5.
determines that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds and
A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project;
B. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
C. The property interests described in Exhibits A through E are necessary
for the proposed project; and
D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has made
to the owners of record.
Section 6. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based
on the record before the City Council on September 8, 1998 when it adopted this Resolution,
including the Agenda Report dated September 8, 1998, all documents incorporated in the
Agenda Report, the testimony at the hearing, the records and documents prepared in
connection with the Project, the testimony and evidence presented at hearings related to the
Project, and the public records of the City pertaining to the Project, all of which are incorporated
in this Resolution by this reference.
Section 7. The City of Temecula hereby authorizes and directs Richards,
Watson & Gershon, as City Attorney, to take all steps necessary to commence an action in a
court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property interests described in
this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 8th day of September, 1998.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT I
Legal Description
Lot 4 BIk 27 Town of Temecula
Book: 015 Page: 726 Lot: 04
ITEM 16
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
/'~san W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services
September 8, 1998
Designation of Voting Delegate for California League of Cities Annual
Conference
RECOMMENDATION: Designate a voting delegate and an alternate.
BACKGROUND: Each year at the League Annual Conference, the member cities are asked to
designate the voting delegate and alternate. Every member city is entitled to one vote in
matters affecting Municipal or League policy. The business meeting will be held on Saturday,
October 3, 1998, at 1:30 P.M., at the Long Beach Convention Center. If it is not possible for
a member of the City Council to be present, the Council may designate a City official to attend
the conference.
Attached is the memorandum from the League President that further elaborates on the voting
procedures.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT:
Memorandum from Ronald Bates, League President
R:ILETTERSICALIF. LEAGUE ANNUAL.DOC 9/1/98
Better Cities-A Better Life
Leaque of California Cities
14-00 K Street
Sacramento, CA 9581
9~6.038.8200
FAX 916.658.82ar0
www. cacities.org
July 17, 1998
To:
From:
Re:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ronald Bates, League President, Mayor, Los Alamitos
Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference
This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Friday, October 2, through Sunday,
October 4, 1998 in Long Beach. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the
Annual Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual
Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality,
responsiveness and vitality of local govemment in California. It is important that all cities be
represented at the Annual Business Meeting on Saturday, October 3, at 1:30 p.m. at the
Long Beach Convention Center.
To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city
council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the
Annual Business Meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in
matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official
designated by the city council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." If the mayor or a
member of the city council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these
officials will be designated as the voting delegate. However, if the city council will not have a
registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these
officials should be designated the voting delegate or alternate.
Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of the
League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, September 18, 1998), so that proper
records may be established for the Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting
card at the designated Voting Card Table located in the League Registration Area.
The voting procedures to be followed at this Conference are printed on the reverse side of this
memo.
Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated.
If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at 916/658-8236.
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Susan W. Jones/City Clerk~
September 8, 1998
Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Appointment
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint a member to serve an unexpired term on the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee.
BACKGROUND: A vacant position exists on the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory
Committee. This appointment will expire September 26, 1999.
Although two applications were received, one applicant was not qualified and, therefore, only
one application was forwarded to the subcommittee composed of Mayor Pro Tern Ford and
Councilman Lindemans for review and recommendation. Both Mayor Pro Tem Ford and
Councilman Lindemans recommend the appointment of Angela Salvatore to serve for the
remainder of the vacant term.
Attached is a copy of the application that was received by the filing deadline of July 17, 1998.
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Application for Appointment
. ,::.
~ ~ ~~E COU~ OR OTHER CI~ BOA~, COffEE OR CO~S~ON ON
· ...>~;.-~:..,~, %:~b~2~'~.~::Z.~ ::.:,: ..: ...., '.,:~%~ ~;~::.:..~.;~'...,,........ :,. :. '..~.~:.~... ::.,,..'..~:. '~.~
'.r ' ~ ~:..&';,~'~"~':~..~': :.~t,.,',,.'~;.'- :... ~':'k~'.~;;~'~"-'....:.~',; 7.'..: . '.": ' .. ~5."L:,:':~s ,:..~'.,.
....-::::,:,::.::..'. ::>:: . -, .~0.::::...::. ,.,.,:::. :;:. ::::.>.::: :.
B~EFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, A~ WHY YOU ' "4:- '
...... ¢.~.,. ~-~:,..
BELIE~ YOU ARE ~UALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC ~ afl~itlo~ ~r If
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
.,.
in n r pu at on pu pos
SIGNATUR ..... 'IX DATE:
PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies.
Return to: City Clerk*s Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033
r:\commis\appform.rda
ITEM 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council
FROM:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE:
September 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Funding Request
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider a $18,000 funding request from the
Temecula Valley Playhouse for their community service programs.
DISCUSSION: On August 25, 1998 the City Council considered a Community Service
Funding request of $18,000 from the Temecula Valley Playhouse. Based on the financial information
provided by the Playhouse, the City Council was unable to determine the level of funding required
by the Playhouse. The Playhouse has since updated their fiscal year 1998-99 budget based on their
prior year actuals. The new budget includes all fundraising revenue estimates, as well as the related
expenses of those activities.
The Playhouse estimates total revenue of $73,420 for FY 1998-99, which includes fundraising and
a City contribution of $18,000. The Playhouse has budgeted total expenses at $76,040. Attached
is the revised budget, which details the Playhouse's operations. The Playhouse antidpates spending
$3,610 for electrical rewidng, sound improvements and theater repainting. Julie Pitruzzello,
Playhouse Board Director, has indicated that these repairs will only be completed if fundraising goals
are exceeded.
FISCAL IMPACT: $15,000 is included in the FY 1998-99 Community Support budget to fund this
request. A transfer of $3,000 from the Community Services Funding Line Item will be required to
fund this request.
Attachment:
Revised Fiscal Year 1998-99 Budget
Application
August 25, 1998 Staff Report
~ TEMEC_ FS20'f ~DA TA ~DEPTSU=INANCEWOR T ONL LAG ENDAS~9899CSFPLA YHOUSEAGN2. DOC 08/04/97
P,02
Aug-2~-98 11:44A
08/27/98
To: Temecula City Counca
Re: Community Services Fut~ling/Grant
Following the most recent City Council meeting, it is o~r traderstanding tktt it is
necessary to supply th~ Council with an accurate and deta~t annual fi~'ial
statement. Ire apologize for not ha~ng proper~ prepared o~r applicatian/request, and
we believe that the following report will clarbS~ the details.
Our commmUty theatre has had a wonderful year. It has been a year of tremendous
growth and unprecedented community support. Th~ theatre has enjoyed a large
renovation and has added over 60 volunteers to our program. Last year at this time, we
approached the Corntoil at a critical time-without last year's grant of $15, 000 we would
have had to close our doors due to lack of funding. Such a situation is not uncommon
among community theatres. Fortunately, we received the grant, kept open the doors, and
this is the first time that we put before the Council our request. while being current on all
of our payables. As stated during our presentation at last year's Council Meeting, being
in a position of 'break even' has long been one of our goals-we are proud to say that
during our 1997-1998 season we met that goal.
As a result of preparing for this request, we have realized a need to improve our
accounting structure. In August, we were pleased to _.M___d a recently retired CPA to our
Board of Directors who will serve in the position of Treasurer, effective 8epteraber Ist.
Previously, the position was Item by a single mother who works fill-time as a
bookkee!~r and who generously gave as much time as she could to our Board. With
improved accounting structure in place, we are confident that TFP will give timely and
accurate reports.
We are increasing our community awareness efforts by placing an ad in the Temecula
Visitors' Guide, I~ctrtictpating in the Newcomers' Club, contacting various civic and
seniors' clubs, attd giving complimentary passes to various Temecula organizations such
as the Old Town Merchants, Rotary, etc. It is our hope that this increased participation
and awareness will ultimately result in increased revenues to our organization.
O~ce again, we wish to thank the City Cowtell for the consideration and support you
have extended to TVP. We look forward to another positive year orscrying our
community.
Respectfull,
Temecula Valley Playhouse Board of Directors
TVP ORGANIZATIONAL FFNANCIAI, INFORMATION
PROJECTED 1998-1999
(BASED UI~N ACTUAL FIGURES FOR 1997-1998)
,INCOME
Earned Income:
Contributed Income
Fundraising Events
Ticket inks
Conces~inn Sales
AdvertiSement Sales
Commmi~ Svc Grant
Individual Contributions
Murde~ Mysteries
Theatre P, cntals
Broadway Revue
Christmas Showcase
Opening Night Events
Annual Dinner/Dance
cha~-e format for the ~oming
$ 42,320
4,200
450
i 8,000
1,200
1,400
150
2,200
400
! ,000
2,100
INCOME TOTAL
$ 73,420
EXPENSES
Insurance
Utilities (Electricity & Phone)
Pfiiiting
tickets
programs
~yers
newslat~rs
postcards
Advertising- media
Production E~q~ens~s:
Copyrights, Royalties, Music, & Scripts
Musicals
Straight Plays
$ 26,400
1,740
4,320
180
1,800
750
1,100
1,550
750
i 7,400
2,475
_EXPENSES, CONTINUED
Production Expenses, continued
Sets
Costumes
Directors' Stipends
TVP h, the atly ....... .-,ity~in tl~tnlandEmpir(t
influxe(qu~yd~reOas ~p~d:
3,600
1,800
1,500
Postage & PO Box Rental 2,300
Repairs & Maintenance
cleaning supplies, paper produds, ~c.
· ~u vh~ delm~ i~ ~.~,h~ by ~ · ~,~,~ 1,390
air condition0r repair/replacement 1,200
Concession Supplies 2, 100
Civic Dues 75
Repainting of theatre lobby 610
Electrical re-wiring, lighting & sound imp. rovcments 3,000
EXPENSE TOTAL
$76,040
IF FUNDRAISERS EXCEED OUR PROJECTIONS, THE FOLLOWING EXPENSES
.4RE PRIORITIES TO BE MET IN 1998-1999
Providing scholarships to local high schools
$1,000
CITY OF TEMECULA
1998-99
COMMUNITY SERVICES FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION
(Please Print or Type)
1998-99 Program Submission Deadline: Friday, September 25, 1998 {7 copies required)
Amount Requested:
Name of Project: llE]vECULA VAI IFY PLAYHOUSE
Project Start Date: JULY 1982
ORGANIZATION'S DATA:
Name of Organization:
Contact Name:
Mailing Address: P0 BOX 74
Telephone: 909-676-0775
Number of Paid Staff: -0-
Geographic Area(s) Served:
Project End Date:
Ct3NTINIIA1
(Maximum allowable $5,000)
TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
JULIE PITRUZZELLO
TEMECULA, CA 92592
Year Founded: 1982
Number of Volunteers:
TENECULA VALLEY & SURROUNDING AREAS
150 - 200
is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization?
If"
Yes X No
yes":
Date of incorporation as a non-profit
Federal identification number
State identification number
Effective Date: O6/I('}/RR
06/10/83
33-0008806
1144097
*Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California.
If "no":
Name of sponsoring organization
Federal identification number
State identification number
This application has been authorized by the organization's:
Executive Committee x :, Board of Directors x
Members-at-large
R.' ;NOR TONL ~ CSk'm, ,9899,4 PP. FRM 2 E "2 '_e c
City of Temecula
Community Service Funding Program
Application
Financial Statements (Based on your orglnazatlon's last fiscal year)
Balance Sheet as of June 30. 1998
Asset
Cash and Investments 2,193
Fixed Assets 64,276
Total Assets 66,469
LIabilities & Investments
Current Payables
Notes Payable
Fund Balance
0
15.950
50,519
Total Liabilities &
Fund Balance
66.469
Income Statement for Year Ended 1998
Income
Fundraising 8,701
Government Funds 15,000
Other Sources ' 32,306
Expense
Salaries
Operating Expense"
Community Service
0
50.463
14.121
*Ticket Sales and Donations
"Rent and Utilities
CITY OF TEMECULA
1998-99
COMMUNITY SERVICES FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION
(Please Print or Type)
1998-99 Program Submission Deadline:
Amount Requested: $ /Lf ~
,/
Name of Project: TE]v!ECULA VAIl F"Y PLAY1-DUSE
Project Start Date: JULY 1982
ORGANIZATION'S DATA:
Name of Organization:
Contact Name:
Friday, September 25, 1998 (7 copies required)
Mailing Address: P0 BOX 74
Telephone: 909-676-0775
Number of Paid Staff: -0-
Project End Date: CONTINIIAI
Geographic Area(s) Served:
TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
JULIE PITRUZZELL0
(Maximum allowable $5,000)
TEMECULA, CA 92592
Year Founded: 1982
Number of Volunteers:
TEMECULA VALLEY & SURROUNDING AREAS
150 - 200
is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization?
Yes X No
if "yes":
Date of incorporation as a non-profit
Federal identification number
State identification number
Effective Date: 06/1C)/R.~
06/10/83
33-0008806
1144097
*Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California.
If "no":
Name of sponsoring organization
Federal identification number
State identification number
This application has been authorized by the organization's:
Executive Committee x ~ Board of Directors x
Members-at-large
R.':NORTONL ICSr'19899APP. FRM 05,'I 3/95'
Temecula Valley Playhouse
Cash Flow Report
June 30. 1998
Income
Ad Income
City Grant
Corporate Sponsor
Other Income
Seat Sponsor
Ticket Sales
Total Income
25
15,000
225
196
8,280
32,281
56.007
Expense
Ads
Depreciation
Insurance
Utilities
Concessions
Dues
Fundraisers
Misc.
Postage
Production
Rent
Repairs
Scripts
Sound
Supplies
Telephone
Theater Exp
Theatre R&M
TotalExpense
835
8.768
1.615
1,862
85
70
990
1,450
121
11,515
25,539
420
88
487
1,291
1,039
8,253
155
64,584
Net Income
(8,578)
THE ORGANIZATION MISSION
STATEMENT
Application Page 3
Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services
provides. include discussion on the specific ways your organization meets the City's criteria listed
page 2.
*Please see attached "Mission Statement", exhibit 'A'
° TVP HAS CONTINUED TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY COMMUNITY THEATRE YEAR AFTER YEAR,
ESPECIALLY AS THE COMMUNITY GROWS AND ADDITIONAL VOLUNTEERS ARE ADDED TO OUR P~.
R: ',NOR TONL I CS,c, 9899,:1PP. FRM
° THE TVP BOARD OF DIRECTORS CURREI, ITLY HAS 9 EXECUTIVE NEIvBERS AND HAS RECENTLY ADDFn 4 CHAI~'4ANSHIP
POSITIONS WITH I~IVIDJALS WHO ARE EXPERIENCED IN MANAGBvENT, ACCOUNTING, Mt;M~N RESOURCES, MARKETING,
~ NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONAL MANA~. ~ BOARD CONTINUES TO I~LEMB~T EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS ~
ACTIVITIES TO INGREASE THE QUALITY OF OUR CRG~NIZATION. TVP ENJOYS A '~vEIvBER.g-IIP'' OF OVER ;~D O VOLUNTEERS.
° TVP'S '97 - '98 SEASON WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL WITH THE ORGANIZATION EXPERIENCING RECORD NUvBERS OF
C(]vMUNITY SUPPORT. THIS SUPPORT WAS EVIDENT IN TICKET SALES, AS WELL AS NEW NE]vBERSHIP, C~NIT'.
SPONSORSHIPS, INCREASED NUlvBER OF VOLUNTEERS IN EVERY ASPECT OF THEATRE A~E) PRODUCTION.
° REC~NRDING FISCAL MANAGEMENT, TVP HAS HAD SUFFICIENT FISCAL MANAGBvENT: HOWEVER, THE BOARD IS PLEASED
TO HAVE ADDED TO THE TE~M A RETIRED (SPA WITH EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE ON THE BOARDS OF OTHER NON-PROFIT
ARTS ORGANIZATIONS (S~ECIFICALLY, T~E LA JOLLA CO~RARY ARTS MJSEUM ~ SAN DIE~'S OLD ~_OBE THEATRE)
° TVP PROVIDES NLFBEROUS SERVICES TO ~ CO~MJNITY. SINCE 1990, TVP HAS PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY FOR
STUDENTS TO FULFILL COM4JNITY SERVICE REQUIREMENTS, HAS PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY FOR I~IVIDUALS OF
ALL AGES TO I~PROVE THEMSELVES BY PARTICIPATING IN PRODUCTIONS ~ TAKING AN ACTIVE ROLE IN INTELLECTUAL
~ SOCIAL SKILLS, ~ HAS PROVIDED THE COM4JNITY WITH AN INEXPENSIVE EVENING OF FUN ~ LIVE ENTER-
TAIN~NT PRESENTED COLLECTIVELY BY OUR F~MILY ~BvBERS, FRIEd[)S, ~ NEIE~BORS.
° TV~ IS THE ONLY ~ITY THEATRE IN T~E VA~ I FY THAT IS FOR ALL AGES, REGARDLESS OF SEX, RACE, OR
RELIGION ~ WHICH SUPPORTS THE COM~JNITIES OF ~NIFEE, SUN CITY, MJRRIETA, ELSINORE, WILI)OM~R,AND
EXPERIENCED PARTICIPATION FB~M RIVERSIDE, CORONA, ~ FORENO VALLEY b~{) FALLBROOK.
o AS A MB'~BER OF TIE IN~ EIvBIRE THEATRE LEAGUE, OUR COMvlJNITY THEATRE HAS RECEIVED NOTED RECO43NITION
VIA NUNEROUS NOMINATIONS AND AWARDS FOR OUR PERFORMERS AND PR(XIK]TIONS. lt-ESE AWARDS HAVE ELEVATED
TEIrr_CULA'S PRESTIGE ~ ~NITIES WHICH SUPPORT ll-E ARTS.
05'' 3 '9~
Temecula Valley Playhouse
Cash Flow Report
June 30. 1998
Income
Ad Income
Cily Grant
Corporate Sponsor
Other Income
Seat Sponsor
Ticket Sales
Total Income
25
15,000
225
196
8.280
32,281
56.007
Expense
Ads
Depreciation
I nsu ra nce
Utilities
Concessions
Dues
Fundraisers
Misc.
Postage
Production
Rent
Repairs
Scdpts
Sound
Supplies
Telephone
Theater Exp
Theatre R&M
Total Expense
835
8,758
1,815
1,862
85
70
990
1,45Q
121
11,515
25,539
420
88
487
1,291
1,039
8,253
155
64,584
Net Income
(e.578)
EXHIBIT A
Mission Statement
Temecula Valley Playhouse
The Temecula Valley Playhouse is the place to be, not just a place to visit.
The TVP is dedicated to the community as a non-profit, non-denominational
cultural amenity by helping the individual, young and old, develop the mind, the
body and the spirit. We will, through hard work and a common commitment to
excellence, join these individuals together to create, motivate, educate. and inspire
beyond what any individual believes possible of themselves. -
The Temecula Valley Playhouse has continued to provide high quality
community theater year after year even as the community continues to expand
and additional volunteers are added to the program.
2. TVP has added several people to the board of Directors who specialize in
Management, Marketing, Advertising and Accounting with a passion for
theater. The accounting methods within the Playhouse have been upgraded
allowing our board to have a more active role in controlling costs. Concurrently,
the Marketing, Advertising and Promotional efforts have been "stepped up" to
create and implement effective strategies and activities vital to the growth of the
Playhouse.
3. TVP was granted a non-profit status on July 10, 1983. ~ ~
4. TVP does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality, sex, marital
status, disability, religion or political aff'diation.
5. TVP does not require anyone to participate in any political, religious or social
activity.
6. The number of volunteers and the continued support by the Citizens and
Merchants indicate a high level of support for the Playhouse.
7. & 8. Attached Financial Statement for 1996-1997 and the budget for 1997-1998.
TVP through the use of public access or cable TV, radio, newspapers, mailers
and fiyers, encourage everyone to attend each run of a show, subject to seating
capacity of 160 per show.
10. The TVP Board of Directors, which is very involved with each show, evaluates
every show on what was done right and what could be improved. Evidence of this
can be seen by the quality of talented performers the Playhouse continues to attract.
PROJECT REQUESTING
FUNDING
Application Page 4
How will your organization use any funding awarded? Provide project objectives, persons served, are
serviced, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Include equipment or services that wouk,
be purchased and why. include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this
project. You may attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information. (Please
type or print legibly.)
WP has experienced vaqderfully increased connmity support during the past season. Ticket sales,
attendance, and financial sponsorships have enjoyed an all-time high. TVP has acccmplished
substantial renovation: the theatre now has real theatre seating, currained wails, and a concession/
ticket sales beoth. lhese acccmplismsTts have been attained by the support of the Cormunity Services
Funding, the suppont of financial donors, and the support of volunteers and ticket sales.
TVP n~Suests fL~ding tO off-set expenses projected for the coming season, as described below:
rent $26
i n~uranc~ !, 78
uti 1 ities 2,160
Dhone 540
printing 4,500
postaqe 1,4EO
production costs 13,003 --
2, l iCIhl'ing 3,EX3Q
re-patint~ng of lobby 500
TVHS scholarship 500-
stipends 1 ,O00
~55,990
this figure includes rents, royalties, set construction cos~
for the six shows slated tO be presented for the '98-'99 se
znls 1s ?or a re-condltloned ~lt
PROJECTED ANNUAL EXPENSES
$38,880 PROJECTED AF~EJAL TICKET SALES
$17,110 PROJECTED AI'I/UAL DEFICIT FOR WHICH WE ARE REQUESTING RJf{)ING
TVP anticipates increased support of volmteers and sponsorships for the coming year.
Yhe continued interest and support from the City Council is 9reatly appreciated. WP is
proud to offer the cormunity quality performances, as well as an opportunity tO be involved
in a viable and productive organization.
R: !NOR TONL l CSF19899A PP. FRM OE <I 3/9 ~
EXHIBIT A
Mission Statement
Temecula Valley Playhouse
The Temecula Valley Playhouse is the place to be, not just a place to visit.
The TVP is dedicated to the community as a non-profit, non-denominational
cultural amenity by helping the individual, young and old, develop the mind, the
body and the spirit. We will, through hard work and a common commitment to
excellence, join these individuals together to create, motivate, educate and inspire
beyond what any individual believes possible of themselves.
The Temecula Valley Playhouse has continued to provide high quality
community theater year after year even as the community continues to expand
and additional volunteers are added to the program.
TVP has added several people to the board of Directors who specialize in
Management, Marketing, Advertising and Accounting with a passion for
theater. The accounting methods within the Playhouse have been upgraded
allowing our board to have a more active role in controlling costs. Concurrently,
the Marketing, Advertising and Promotional efforts have been "stepped up" to
create and implement effective strategies and activities vital to the growth of the
Playhouse.
3, TVP was granted a non-profit status on July 10, 1983.
4. TVP does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality, sex, marital
status, disability, religion or political aff'diation.
5. TVP does not require anyone to participate in any political, religious or social
activity.
6. The number of volunteers and the continued support by the Citizens and
Merchants indicate a high level of support for the Playhouse.
7. & 8. Attached Financial Statement for 1996-1997 and the budget for 1997-1998.
TVP through the use of public access or cable TV, radio, newspapers, mailers
and fiyers, encourage everyone to attend each run of a show, subject to seating
capacity of 160 per show.
10. The TVP Board of Directors, which is very involved with each show, evaluates
every show on what was done right and what could be improved. Evidence of this
can be seen by the quality of talented performers the Playhouse continues to attract.
SIGNATURE PAGE
Application Page 5
We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and
belief.
Preparer:
JULIE A. PITBJ'EBLO, BDAE) DIRECTOR OF TE]vEQJLA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type)
AND~'~
President or
Authorized Officer:
NAME
PATTI DREW, VICE PRESIDENT OF TB, EOJLA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
AND 7TILE (Please Print or Type)
(Signature)
BUTTERFIELD STAGE PLAYERS DBA: TERECLILA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
(Organization Name)
P0 BOX 74 TE]vECULA, CA 92592
(Mailing Address of Organization)
909.-676-0775
(Telephone)
&JLY 31, 1998
(Date)
BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE ORIGINAL PLUS 6 COPIES (TOTAL OF 7 COPIES) AND SUBMIT TO:
Mail Completed Application to:
City of Temecula
Community Services Funding Program
Linda Norton
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Or Deliver in Person to:
City of Temecula
Linda Norton
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R: WCR TONL l CSF'19899A PP. FRM 05' 73 '98
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance'~//'''
August 25, 1998
Temecula Valley Playhouse Community Service Funding Request
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider a $18,000 funding request from the
Temecula Valley Playhouse for their community service programs.
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Valley Playhouse is a not-for-profit organization established
in 1983. Since that time the Playhouse has provided a high quality community theater by using
numerous volunteers and community donations. This organization provides important, valuable
services to all age groups in our community.
Educational Services: Since 1990 the Playhouse has provided community service hours
to local high school students assisting them in fulfilling their graduation requirements.
Individual Improvement: Both young and old individuals improve themselves by
participating in Playhouse productions while learning important academic and social skills
such as: teamwork, communication, accountability, public speaking, respect, commitment
and patience. These skills lead to improved self-esteem and confidence which in turn helps
improve the quality of the community as individual citizens grow in a positive, proactive
environment.
Cultural Amenity: The Playhouse is a community theater in the Temecula Valley area that
is for all ages, regardless of sex, race, or religion. The Playhouse provides a community
service that offers inexpensive fun, live entertainment, presented by family members, friends
and neighbors of residents of the City of Temecula.
In the future, the Temecula Valley Playhouse plans to:
become self sufficient;
implement a marketing program to reach surrounding communities;
introduce scholarship funds for the Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore school districts;
obtain corporate sponsors and members to improve the short-term revenue and volunteer
support base.
R WOR TCNL ~GENDASICSF PLAYHOUSE AGEIVDA DOG 0~'04797
The City of Temecula has supported the Playhouse annually through the City's Community Service
Funding Program.
In prior years, the Playhouse has used its funding for the replacement of sound equipment,
replacement of seating, cleaning the air ducts and heating system. repair of lighting equipment, and
operating expenses of the facility. The Playhouse is requesting $18,000 for FY 1998-99 for the
purpose of assisting the organization with its annual operating costs associated with theater
productions. The Playhouse's operating expenses for the 1998-99 season total $55,990, with ticket
sales anticipated to cover only $38,880 of these costs.
The Playhouse utilizes more than 200 volunteers. The 1997-98 season was very successful.
Community support was strong, as evidenced by ticket sales, new memberships, community
sponsorships, and increased numbers of volunteers suppoding the organization.
FISCAL IMPACT: $15,000 is included in the FY 1998-99 Community Support budget to fund this
request. An additional appropriation of $3,000 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance will
be required to fund this request.
Attachment: Application
R WORTONLLAGENDAS~CSF PLAYHOUSE AGENDA DOC 08/04/97