Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout090298 PC MinutesMINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, September 2, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Naggar, Soltysiak, Webster, and Chairwoman Slaven. Absent: None. Also Present: Planning Manager Ubnoske, Senior Planner Hogan, Assistant Planner Anders, Senior Engineer of Public Works Alegria, Attorney Diaz, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Plannine Application No. PA98-0270 {Development Plan) Request to construct a 16,656 square foot office/manufacturing/warehouse building With associated parking and landscaping on a one acre parcel. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request as conditioned. Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record) advising that the applicant is requesting a minor exception permit for reduction of the minimum parking requirements by two (2) parking spaces, clarifying that the Development Code requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces for this particular project, and noting that pursuant to the Code, a credit of two (2) vehicle spaces may be counted for the proposed six (6) additional bicycle spaces. Ms. Anders clarified, for Commissioner Soltysiak, that the parking requirements are not divided between office and visitor accommodations, but viewed in its entirety, noting that this project, as proposed, will be short two (2) parking spaces; however, because the proposed use will function as warehouse, the applicant's present parking needs could be accommodated. With regard to landscaping, Commissioner Webster commented on the inconsistency with the tree size in the Design Guidelines which requires the planting of a certain percent of 15 gallon, 24-inch boxed, and 36-inch boxed trees. Senior Planner Hogan clarified that although landscaping on this particular project will meet the Development Code requirements, there is a difference between the Design Guidelines and the Development Code, noting that the Development Code supersedes the Design Guidelines. With regard to Condition No. 57 (water entities), Planning Manager Ubnoske provided, for Commissioner Webster, additional clarification. Considering the size of the project, Assistant Planner Anders clarified, for Commissioner Webster, that this project would not require the completion of any traffic studies and that it was determined that AM and PM traffic impact would be insignificant. Planning Manager Ubnoske further advised that as long as this project is consistent with the General Plan additional traffic studies would not be required. For Chairwoman Slaven, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff is in the process of updating the Circulation Element, noting that any modifications would forwarded to the Commission for review. Mr. Scott Buckels, representing the applicant, clarified that the nature of this business will be primarily manufacturing, noting that because the current business has no signage to encourage walk-in business, parking will be primarily for employees; commented, for Commissioner Naggar, on the zero lot line due to the size of the lot in order to maximize building space, meet safety requirements, and to provide adequate turnaround space for the fire department. For Commissioner Naggar, Assistant Planner Anders clarified that planning staff has closely worked with the architect to mitigate the view of a blank wall on the east elevation, noting that the applicant was very accommodating. Senior Planner Hogan noted, for Mr. Naggar, that currently there is no plan to develop the adjacent property. For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Raadeker advised that the business uses stains and lacquers in compliance with AQMD regulations, which are stored in 55-gallon drums and that the application is applied in a ventilated spray booth, previously approved by the City. The Commissioners commended the applicant on the project. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; to adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-027; to adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0270; and to adopt Resolution No. 98-034 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-027 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 16,656 SQUARE FOOT ONE-STORY OFFICE, WAREHOUSE AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING, ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING A 1.0 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1100 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF DIAZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-310-009. Amend a minor exception permit to allow the reduction of the parking requirements by two (2) spaces for the six (6) extra bicycle spaces provided Commissioner Naggar further commended the mitigation efforts for projects that abut the property line and praised Assistant Planner Anders on her efforts with regard to this issue, noting that such efforts provide for a more efficient approval process. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 3. Planning Application No. PA95-0079 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28257) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission deny the request. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the applicant has requested a continuance, recommending that the matter be postponed to the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, further advising that the public hearing be opened if there are public members who would like to speak. Chairwoman Slaven opened the public hearing. Ms. Jeannine Paul, 43315 Corte Rialto, read a letter into the record from Mr. Peruchetti, the applicant, addressing his rationale for requesting the continuation to the Planning Commission, and Ms. Paul provided copies of the letter to staff and the Commission. Mr. Robert I. Backstrom, 30498 Colina Verde, owner of 2 parcels that back up to the Peruchetti property, spoke in opposition to the project, stating that his primary concerns are as follows: drainage, access, and safety for fire department access. Mr. Backstrom stated he would like to reserve further comments for the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting. Planning Manager Ubnoske noted, for the record, that planning staff received three letters in opposition to the Peruchetti project. Chairwoman Slaven left the public hearing open. The matter was continued to the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT Planning Manager Ubnoske presented the revised elevations on Mall Entry #2 due to the concerns raised by the Commissioners at the August 19, 1998, Planning Commission meeting; clarified that staff has determined that there is substantial conformance with the current design to the original design, and the other mall entries; and displayed the revision, by way of overheads, noting that in comparison to the original design, the height decreased from 52' to 49' 9" and the width from 51' to 43'. Ms. Ubnoske reported to the Commission that due to concem noted by the Commission, with regard to Dial Automotive, a Code Enforcement Officer went out on August 27, 1998, and determined that the property is in compliance with Code requirements as per conditions set forth by the County which regulates this property. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commissioner Webster's concerns and comments were as follows: With regard to inconsistencies between the Design Guidelines and the Development Code, as to landscaping requirements on the approved project in tonight's meeting, Mr. Webster suggested changing the Design Guidelines, making the requirements more cohesive. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised staff would review for inconsistencies and Mr. Hogan noted that in terms of substantial inconsistencies, the one noted may be the only one. With regard to bike lanes, and since they are in the General Plan, and we give credit for bicycle spaces for parking spaces, why are they not being implemented? Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that bike lanes are required in residential areas, and noted she would discuss this matter with TSCD and get back to the Commission with further information. In regard to the General Plan, specifically the Land Use element (table 2:4 and 2:4), it was suggested to provide an updated report to evaluate if the City is on track with what was envisioned, between existing Land Use element and the projected general Land Use conditions, since the last update was in 1991. With regard to the General Plan, specifically the housing element, there's mention of an annual report, regarding housing, as well as annual housing needs assessment, it was suggested that this report be forwarded to the Commission. Senior Planner Hogan clarified that although the State requires the Housing Element be updated approximately every 5 years, the State hasn't funded the regional housing need assessment, which allocates funding to the communities; therefore the State has been deferring it, and the Planning Department is anticipating it to occur next year, noting that once the report is completed, it will be transmitted to the Commission for review. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff will attempt to address these concerns (items C. and D.) Although the Housing and Circulation Elements information may not be currently available, staff can address the other issues, certainly the Land Use element, and will make every effort to do that before the end of this year. Commissioner Webster that he would not be able to attend the September 16, 1998, Planning Commission Meeting. Chairwoman Slaven's concerns and comments were as follows: With regard to the current Traffic Circulation questioned when that information will be Forwarded to the Commission. Senior Planner Hogan advised that a draft study will be Complete in a couple months and that the evaluation will be shared with the Commission. Noted that although there has been improvement in other intersections, at the intersection of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, making a left turn from Winchester Road to go south on Ynez Road, the signal is not efficiently facilitating traffic at this left-turn light. Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified there is a new program to synchronize the signals, and since it is still in the process of working out any problems, Ms. Ubnoske will pass on this helpful input. Commissioner Soltysiak's concerns and comments were as follows: The intersection of Margarita Road and De Portola Road requires some type of mitigation to ensure safety. At the new Lucky's Shopping Center, the traffic control across the street was taken away when the center opened up, allowing dght-in and right-out turns only. So presently there are left turns in and out being made. He suggested to review the demarcations in the street. In regard to plot plans on current projects, he suggested to review AB Access more closely, avoiding costly corrections later in the design phase of the development. Concurred with Commissioner Webster that if the bike lanes were implemented, as per the City's Master Plan, it would be a tremendous asset to the community. Commissioner Guerriero concerns and comments were as follows: In regard to Environmental concerns, specifically hazardous materials, more information is needed in the staff report on the mitigation efforts on projects where there is known chemical use and storage on the premises. Queried which Department of Environmental Health reviews these issues in the City -- the State, County, or City. Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that staff gets material data sheets, which the Fire Department reviews, and suggested that the Commission be advised in more detail of the data that has been obtained; noted that the City contracts with the County, and it is the County's Department of Environmental Health that reviews these issues. Mr. Guerriero suggested that the County doesn't have the personnel to facilitate a thorough review, and that the City take a closer look at the kinds of hazardous materials that are coming into the City, and being transported through the City. Ms. Ubnoske advised that she would relay these concerns to Mr. Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official. In regard to Front Street in Old Town Temecula, it was questioned whether the rolled curb is being considered as part of the lane width. Senior Engineer of Public Works Alegria advised that he would investigate this matter. In regard to Old Town, when exiting the transportation hub, exiting the parking lot, making a left turn onto Mercedes Street, there is no clear line of vision, and the condition is worsened by the construction congestion. He suggested the installation of a temporary stop, or another mitigating measure. Questioned when the Commission will review the Mall's corner design at Winchester Road and Ynez Road Planning Manager Ubnoske advised it will most likely be brought to the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, or the meeting following, for review by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Naggar's concerns and comments were, as follows: Concurred with the Commission's comments on the bike trails, noting they would be a great asset to the City. With regard to the Planning Commission meetings, to facilitate an immediate and accurate account of the Commission's decisions and discussions, he suggested to televise the Meetings. Senior Planner Hogan advised there may be limits on the City's franchising agreement, or other obstacles prohibiting the use of this opportunity. Mr. Naggar suggested to further investigate and advise the Commission as to the reasons, whether or not the meetings may be televised. ADJOURNMENT At 7:15 P.M. Chairwoman Slaven formally adjourned this meeting to the September 16, 1998, Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 P.M. Marcia Slaven, Chairwoman Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager