HomeMy WebLinkAbout092590 CC AgendaCALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
A GENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER
SEPTEMBER 25, 1990- 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 90-17
Resolution: No. 90-100
Pastor George Simmons
Temecula Valley House of Praise
Councilmember Mu~oz
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATION$
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two
(2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed
on the Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed
with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all
will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adol3tion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and
resolutions included in the agenda.
3
Resolution AI313rovin~ Payment of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
Flexible Benefits Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
3.2
Adopt the attached City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan
Document.
Establish a monthly Flexible benefit amount for full time
employees and the City Council of $450 exclusive of retirement.
2/egendNO92690 2 09/20190
5
6
7
8
Application for ABC License - Yasohachi Shiojima
Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for-restaurant located at 27511
Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file.
Claim for Damages - Colleen Farrell vs. City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Deny the claim for damages.
Find Tract Map No. 23267-1
Southerly of Highway 79 and westerly of Margarita Road, adjacent to the
Redhawk Specific Plan (S. P. 217) and the Vail Ranch Specific Plan (S. P. 223).
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 23267-1, subject to the conditions
of approval.
Reduction of Securities for Tract No. 20987
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Authorize the reduction in securities for improvements in Tract No.
20987 and direct the City Clerk to advise the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors to so notify the Bond Company (SAFECO Insurance
Company of America)
Parcel Mal? No. 23969
Ridge Park Drive, South of Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Receive and file.
21agerd~/O925~O 3 09120190
9
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No.
Terminus of Lyndie Lane
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Receive and file.
10 Plot Plan No. 11345
South side of Main Street; approximately 200 feet west of Front Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve Plot Plan No. 11345 based on the findings and subject to
the Conditions of Approval contained in the attached County Staff
Report dated April 23, 1990; and the added Condition of the City
of Temecula Engineering Department.
11 IO-K Permit - Stephen's Kan~laroo Rat
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute Federal Fish and Wildlife
License/Permit Application for incidental "take".
11.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute First Amendment to Agency
Agreement California Endangered Species Permit.
CSD MEETING - (To be held at ~00 PM) Please see separate agenda
21egenda/092690 4 011120/90
COUNCIL BUSINESS
12
Waste General Study Memorandum of Understanding with City/County of
Riverside
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of
Understanding with the County of Riverside for Waste
Management Generation Study.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: October 2, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: October 9, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
21egencldOg2580 6 Oel20/BO
ITEM NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$203,156.84
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 251h day of September, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Resos 105
(J
z
r'
F
U~
m
FH
Lfi
',, ',4
m ~
C,
'.O
t . : r-..) r ,1
C,-0 rr ,8 ,2,~ ,8
43 ~ ,C C, ..1~ ~
,--' O' t..3
O"r OG1
,OI C-.I
c,
G1 .~ --i
--I
,O 'T ,0 ~1
,--~ OFT1 ,L..4ZD
O~ .bf F..-q
-07 -0
C,b'l C C,-H
i
r..,'1Fri
F'
0 C, C, Lf';
,o ,o o,- m
I N- r.-~ .,C
'-. '--.F'J
t -0 -8 -Om
o I
O
C,
UI
,,4
0
,0
-,,
I,..1
f jl
\
-I::~.,0
'.-,C0
\r.4TI
6..,,Jrrt
(.... N-a
6..--Jrrl
Ct.,3~)
I'
rrl
-C,0TI
'--'-.-FI
,3 ~a
-I~OlTI
CC, F
rn
x
-g
rrl
01
iO
O
JO
'-I
O
-0
I'.J
UI
-,
C0rr,O
I I
I'g h,' ~
I I (
~r,-.~-~
Z
00
"--'-,:D
--It.., r
,,.-,,~
-O-O:Z
OC
,D 0
OC
O CO OC
I~3 -.0,,0
i',.1 ~ .-.
,-' .~0 r.at.-j
-o -843 -04:]
O
O , O
O O
O O
O,D~ '~
OO O
OO OD
,0,0 ,O"
\'-, ~.
OO O
-I:>-,~ .I~
-13,0 -0
0 D- :O~'
,OO "qf3 .:' :O--I~ LIII~
0 O ;'0 O 0
(A (B ~ F ! -!: lg t,3 ~0 t,3 --
0 -r ~ :,~ ':~". O O ~ U1 ~
~ t.J~ : ~
OH OO OC, O
O ~ QI ~ tg t,3 ~ t.J
,3, C, C,~ C, ,ZC, C,C, C,C, O O O OC,~ C.
o~ m H m H H ~ mm ~ H~ ~ Hm ~ m H m ~ o ~ r~ H o ~
0 Z 0 g 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ O
m ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ · ~ · ~ ·
~ "' Z " "~ "' ~J E ~: .... ~' " r rrl .. H "
C LOg) x '<[3 ' aO
CO rrJQ3 ~-~:I:> ,~ t3
Z~ ,'.'4 ]~ ~ ~) I
C'O
· , rq ~ - ,,
H H m.O · Z 11
I] C O r
CZ ~_ r"C fil~
-0 :iZ Crrl
,Z, IT1 ! ('1 \ r
,-,,..-, '~
I ~__~ rrJr
C, ZEI U'Jr
[ 0' ~-~ '0 ,L.'4 ~ w- ~ C4 (.4 C,l 4~
. · . . .... . · · . . ·
CqJ Lq F.3 C, C, .:..1 6-] Lq Lq C, Lq Lq C, W ~ ~ ~ O 0 ~ N Lq 0 C~ C, O Lq
':" '=' F' I o c, c, o ,=, ,=~ o o c.c. .:, o c, c. o o o o c, o o o c, o c. c,
:-' c, ,.~: :~: :: : :: c, c, :~ o :~: :~: o o c. c. o ,:. o o c, o c.c. c, c. c. ,:,
,C,. .:. ~ '.~ ~ o c, .:~ c ....:. o c. o o o o o o o o o c. o o c,
4 '-.j
!,n Cq
0'- 0-.,
0-. r)-i ,-,J
LTJ ~J C
r.] t.][ C,
!0 ~ ';
ti] rl
n
43
~ .,
I'1
't
I
0
m
z
03 ,o
.m ..
rf
O-0
C.
t.3 03
C,:I:
rq
TI
O
'--O
',0-<
C.
'TI
FI
LD
-0m
-o -0
C, o
t..3
C=
o e
m.
"r
L0
uj
O O
,0, .-0
L. rJ
i~ -, ,q c,
t..J ~ (/.
C, X (.4 Lq
,OC'
ITI
(3
,O-~m
'-.~Fq
,0,,0
O C, L0
O r-
-(
,DI ,D
,D
O
O
L~
>.-',,I~'T]
O~
7
--I
C-..I C,
\
L.q Lq' t.J -4
c. :~ .:, ~
C! ~ C, ~
OO,..~-T3
(.4C..I,--.
CO
IT1
,"-, t",j
t,.l t'J t-J
-O-O-O
000
rnq3
'x
-O
O
O
O
UI
C8 '!
UI
-0
-,
t...1
t..3
OXt
~3
n
Z
t.3 Z
,,0~::s
O
O
O
O
O
O~
(J1Z
0
,0
1',3
UI
'-00
OZ
0
0
Z
0
0
O
0:
O,
Ut :'
-om
o
on
012
~Z
O--I
L0
--I
O O O'-' O 00 O
0D -g 0g'TJ ,8 -8-0
t.3 t..J C.l Z t.J t...t 1'.) tJ
-0 Lq OQ 'Lq LqLII Lq
0 O OF1 0 O0 0
~0' ~0
OOO OZ
Z
O0 O
OOO or
Z
,O
'-O O
U c~ O
7J
Frl
O
O O
e, :;0 Lq
0 TI C,
,OIT1 0
om o
,-.,. ~ r..j
O-z
~O C,
0 0
fq
Z
,"'3.
t]
-.,j
'.4
"r
~ Lq -I ul tn In m. ~n 'r3Z u~ m. ~q r.~ ~q
· , m .. -4t .. ~ .. H .. H m ,. H ..... c
,2..~ ,r.]~ C' 0 D", D" '-*' 0" '2.'~ 43,0 4~ 0' O' C'
· ;'t
'.4 '4 ~ C' C' C' L4 ~'.3 t'3 43C' C' C'
':' ':' '~ '% ~I ~ o o c. ,0 c. o -a .:, .:, c.
-0 m. ,0 -0 t'
O O 0 C.r
Lr) [3 -~ rq
,:= ] c, o
i.
'-4 xi C, 0 6-] C' r.,4 0 O ,-' .-, 0 C,
0 C, ,D O Lq C, LII O C, ,3, C.
C,
C, ._, C, C, 0 O .', n ,D C, C. C, 0 ,", C, 0 0 .D O C. C, 0 0 C, C. O C, O
'C' C. C, C, C, C. n
C' C' C, C, C, C, C,
C,
C, "" ':' C' O ':' ,:. 0 C, O 0 C, 'D 0 C' C, 0 C, ':' C'
' 4 [ ~ ,2.,] C4 4~ .b O- '4 03 F)- 4~ 4~ O- 03 130 C, C, 0
,. ] : !_.l ,'.4' 0 C, 0' O- ~-, Cq 0. ~'.1 -0,0 ~ O' O' C, C, -4 'q O C. .:4 0 .;4 C, O '~ ~ C, C,
" :~ · · : i;-.~ L :0 o c.c.o o .:.
· ~ ' \~ -0 -0 c, c.c. ~I c, c. c. c. c. .:, o cn o
;q , c. c,I ~ ~ -~ -4 o c. c, o ,c, o c, c, o c. o o ~, o cn o o -~ c. o
I
'q C.,
g '-',0
t:~
r0 n ~
n ~ 0D
-< o
,,
< ,c
D r0
rl n
'1
rill
n
rt
p. rt
ID
n O
!n .~
H,'D
M- C
L:
(J1
- ' ' C...I
O
· -,O
;.
%
"' :::' ~! ~ o
· ::,:,; ~ c. z
0
-'0
~ o o
,s, rnl~"
TJ
--i
'~ Z
:.::
~** '2 ITI r,,,l
rl --t0]
--t ~r~ --I
0 -~r- 0
~-~ ])Pl
· . ~j ..
O O 0 ,:, ,:,
C, C, O C, C,
,:, 0 C, C, C,
~ (.4 LIl t-J
,", OC,
~'. 0 O ,2-..I
g- (D gl L~
rD
n
< (
0 r~
fin
m O
-i
n
rt-
0
0
Z
n o
~ rD
r~ _r
Ei ,1.4
-b
ITEM NO. 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECUI A
A GENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry - Finance Dept.
September 18, 1990
Benefits Program
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt the attached City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan
Document.
2. Establish a monthly Flexible benefit amount for full time
employees and the City Council of $450 exclusive of retirement.
DISCUSSION: A Flexible Benefits Plan (or Section 125 plan) is recommended as the
vehicle to provide employees with health benefits and provide cost containment for
the City. This plan allows the participant to shop for benefits such as medical, dental
and vision up to the amount established in 2 above. Premiums in excess of the $450
per month would be deducted from the employee's paycheck. The plan also provides
for optional child care reimbursement at no additional cost to the City. The only
required "purchases" would be life insurance and long term disability. Exhibit A
provides examples of how the monthly allotment could be used.
The monthly contribution was derived from a poll of three local agencies.
If adopted, implementation of the plan would take place during October.
FISCAL IMPACT: The complete benefits package would appropriate thirty percent of
salaries.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
COST SUMMARY FOR PRIMARY BENEFITS - MEDICAL, DISABILITY, LIFE
Employee Only Employee & Spouse Employee & Family
Medical $204 $385 $514
Disability 25 25 25
Life 9 9 9
TOTAL $238 $419 $548
City Cost** $450 $450 $450
Emp. Cost 0 0 $ 98
City "Flex" $212 $ 31 $ 0
CITY OF TEMECULA
FLEX I BLE BENEF ITS PLAN
OCTOBER 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I
ARTICLE II
ARTICLE III
ARTICLE IV
ARTICLE V
ARTICLE VI
ARTICLE VII
ARTICLE VIII
SCHEDULE A-i'
SCHEDULE A-2
ART. I
ART. II
ART. III
ART. IV
ART. V
SCHEDULE A-3
ART. I
ART. II
ART. III
ART. IV
ART. V
FOREWORD AND PURPOSE 1
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION 1
ELIGIBILITY, PARTICIPATION AND ENROLLMENT 3
CONTRIBUTIONS 6
ADMINISTRATION 7
AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN 9
TERMINATION OF THE PLAN 9
MISCELLANEOUS 10
PREMIUMS Ai-1
DEPENDENT CARE COMPONENT A2-1
FORWARD AND PURPOSE A2-1
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION A2-1
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE A2-2
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE ACCOUNTS A2-3
PAYMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE A2-4
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT COMPONENT A3-1
FORWARD AND PURPOSE A3-1
DEFINITIONS A3-1
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS A3-1
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS A3-2
PAYMENT OF MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS A3-3
CITY'OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
ARTICLE I FOREWORD AND PURPOSE
The City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan permits Participants
to elect to receive cash or coverage for themselves and their
eligible Dependents under various Component Plans.
The Plan has been established by the
exclusive benefit of its Employees
under Section 125 of the Internal
"cafeteria plan".
City of
and is
Revenue
Temecula for the
intended to qualify
Code of 1986, as a
ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Definitions: Where the following words and phrases appear
in this Plan they shall have the meaning set forth below, unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Code: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and regulations
and rulings issued thereunder, as amended from time to time.
(b) Component Plan: Any one of the plans listed in subsection
(c) below. It is intended that each of the Component Plans shall
constitute a "qualified benefit" within the meaning of Section 125
of the Code.
(c) Coverage Expenses: The insurance premiums or other costs for
the benefit coverage a Participant elects pursuant to Section 3.3,
and which is provided under one or more of the Component Plans
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
SEE SCHEDULE "A-i, A-2, A-3"
(d) Covered Compensation: For each Plan Year, a Participant's
Covered Compensation shall mean the actual compensation (including
bonuses and overtime) accrued or paid by the Employer to the
Employee for the period during which the Employee was a
Participant in this Plan.
(e) Dependent: A spouse or child of the participant as defined
in the various benefit plans listed on schedule "A-I".
- 1 -
(f) Discrimination: This Plan shall not be operated in such a
manner as to discriminate in favor of highly compensated
individuals pursuant to Code Sections 89 & 105.
(g) Effective Date:
is October 1, 1990.
The date upon which this Plan is effective
(h) Employee: Any person who is an employee (the term
"employee" having its customary, common law meaning) of the
Employer and who is receiving remuneration for personal services
rendered to the Employer and is eligible for coverage in the
various benefit plans offered by the Employer.
(i) Employer: The City of Temecula.
(j) Employer Contribution: The Employer Contribution for each
Plan Year shall be the sum of (1) and (2) below:
(1) Non-elective contributions: The amount the Employer makes
available for the benefit of each Participant for the Plan Year
pursuant to Section 4.1.
(2) Elective Contributions: The amount of Flexible Pay
applied to a Participant's Coverage Expenses under the Plan. It
is intended hereunder that such amounts shall, for tax purposed
(including Section 125 of the Code), constitute an Employer
Contribution. For each Plan Year, the maximum amount of Employer
Contribution available under the Plan to any Participant for
application to his or her Coverage Expenses shall be that amount
set forth in Schedule A of the Plan. For purposes of Section 125
of the Code, the amount set forth in Schedule A shall constitute
the maximum Employer Contribution available to any Participant
under the Plan during a Plan Year. The maximum amount shall be
determined by the Employer prior to the beginning of the Regular
Enrollment Period for the ensuing Plan Year and shall be adjusted
as necessary due to increases in cost of the coverage.
(k) ERISA: Public Law 93-406, the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 and regulations and rulings issued thereunder
as amended from time to time.
(1) Fiduciaries: The Named Fiduciaries who shall be the
Employer and the Plan Administrator, and other parties designated
as Fiduciaries by such Named Fiduciaries in accordance with the
powers herein provided, but only with respect to the specific
responsibilities of each in connection with the Plan.
(m) Flexible Pay: The amount of Covered Compensation that,
pursuant to Section 4.2, is applied on behalf of a Participant to
pay his or her Coverage Expenses or that (to the extent not
otherwise applied). he or she may elect to receive as additional
cash compensation.
(n) Highly Compensated Participant: See Key Employee below.
(o) Key Employee: A Participant who is (1) an officer of the
Employer having at least $45,000 annual compensation from the
Employer or such other amount as is prescribed by the Secretary of
the Treasury from time to time, pursuant to Code Section 415
(d)(1)(B); provided however, that no more than 50 employees, or if
the number of employees of the Employer is less than 500, the
greater of three of 10% of the employees, shall be treated as
officers; (2) one of the 10 employees, having at least $30,000
annual compensation from the Employer (or such other amount as is
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury from time to time
pursuant to Code Section 415 (d)(1)(B).
(p) Participant: Any
terms of the Plan for
qualified.
Employee who
participation
has qualified under the
herein and who remains so
(q) Plan: The City of Temecula Flexible
herein, as amended form time to time.
Benefits Plan set forth
(r) Plan Administrator:
successors,.which shall have
provided in Article V.
The Employer
authority to
or its successor or
administer the Plan as
(s) Plan Year: The first Plan Year shall be the period commencing
October 1, 1990 and ending June 30, 1991. All subsequent Plan
Years shall be the 12-month period commencing on July 1 and ending
on June 30.
2.2 Construction: As used in this Plan, the masculine gender
includes the feminine, and the singular includes the plural,
unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary. The words
"hereof", "hereunder" and other similar compounds of the word
"here" mean and refer to the entire Plan, not to any particular
provision or section.
ARTICLE III ELIGIBILITY, PARTICIPATION AND ENROLLMENT
3.1 Eligibility and Participation:
(a) Commencement of Participation: An eligible Employee, as
defined in Section 2.1, shall commence (or recommence)
participation in this Plan on the latest of the following dates:
(1) the Effective Date of the Plan, (2) the first day of the
month following the Employee's first full calendar month of
employment or reemployemnt [may not exceed 37 months] as an
Employee; or (3) the date (as determined by the Plan
Administrator) that the Election Form is filed by the Participant.
- 3 -
Not withstanding the preceding sentence, an Employee who is
disabled and not' actively employed on the date his or her
participation would otherwise have commenced shall not become a
Participant in the Plan until the date he or she returns to active
employment as an Employee. A Participant's right to participant
in any Component Plan shall be dependent upon the Participant's
satisfying the specific terms and conditions of participation
which are applicable to such Component Plan.
(b) Termination of Participation: A Participant shall continue
to participate in this Plan until the earlier of the following
dates: (1) The day Participant ceases to qualify as a participant
resulting from termination of employment or failure to make
required contributions, if any; (2) the day Participant terminates
membership in a group or class of employees eligible for Plan or
Program benefits; (3) with respect to a covered dependent, the
date such person ceases to be a dependent; or (4) the date the
Plan is terminated.
3.2 Enrollment: An eligible Employee as defined in section 2.1
may enroll (or re-enroll) in the Plan by submitting to the Plan
Administrator, during an enrollment period described in subsection
(a) below, an Election Form which specifies his or her elections
for the Plan Year as to Dependent status and benefit coverage
under the Component Plans for which he or she is eligible, which
sets forth his or her agreement to use the necessary amount of
Flexible Pay to pay his or her Coverage Expenses (if any), and
which meets such other standards for completeness and accuracy as
the Plan Administrator may establish. Such Employee shall specify
his election as to Dependent status as coming within one of the
following categories; (i) Employee without Dependents, or (ii)
Employee with one Dependent, or (iii) Employee with two or more
Dependents. A Participant's Election Form shall not be effective
prior to the date such form is submitted to the Plan
Administrator. Any Election Form submitted by a Participant in
accordance with this Section shall remain in effect until the
earlier of the following dates: the date the Participant
terminates participation in the Plan or the effective date (as
determined by the Plan Administrator) of a subsequently filed
Election Form submitted pursuant to subsections (a) (2) and (3)
below.
(a) Enrollment Periods:
(1) Each Employee who is eligible, as defined in Article 2.1 on
October 1, 1990 shall have an Initial Enrollment Period which
shall begin on September 20, 1990 and shall terminate on October
15, 1990. Each Employee who becomes eligible on or after October
1, 1990 shall have an Initial Enrollment Period which shall begin
on the first day of his or her eligibility to participate as a
eligible employee and shall terminate 45 days thereafter.
- 4 -
(2) Each participant shall have a Regular Enrollment Period
during which to make elections for the immediately ensuing Plan
Year. The Regular Enrollment Period for such Plan Year shall
commence on May 15 prior to such Plan Year, and shall terminate 45
days thereafter June 30.
(3) A participant who incurs a change in Dependent status shall
have a Special Enrollment Period which shall begin on the date of
his or her Dependent status changes and shall terminate 45 days
thereafter.
For purposes of this paragraph,
shall change when his or her
identity, or employment.
a Participant's Dependent status
Dependents change in number,
(b) Enrolling Dependents: An eligible Employee may enroll in
the Plan any or all of his or her Dependents during his or her
Initial Enrollment Period, Regular Enrollment Period, or Special
Enrollment Period. A Participant who incurs a Dependent status
change may enroll any new Dependents during the Special Enrollment
Period commencing on the date such individuals become Dependents
of the Participant. Any Dependent not enrolled during an
Enrollment Period described in the two preceding sentences may be
enrolled thereafter for the current Plan Year only with the
consent of the Plan Administrator. An Employee shall enroll his or
her Dependents by specifying, on such forms as the Plan
Administrator may require, the Dependents' names and birth dates,
and by electing the category of dependent coverage that
corresponds to the number of Dependents the Employee wishes to
enroll.
(c) Limitations on. Enrollment Elections: A Participant's right
to elect certain benefit coverage shall be limited hereunder to
the extent such rights are limited in a Component Plan or in rules
adopted by the Plan Administrator. Furthermore, a Participant
shall not be entitled to revoke an Enrollment Election after a
period of coverage has commenced and to make a new Enrollment
Election with respect to the remainder of the period of coverage
unless both the revocation and the new election are on account of
and consistent with a change in family status (e.g., marriage,
divorce, death of a spouse or child, birth or adoption of child,
and termination of employment of spouse).
(d) Notice of Eligibility: The Plan Administrator shall notify
employees of their eligibility to participate in the Plan and of
the terms of the Plan. Each Participant shall be furnished with a
copy of this Plan Description.
- 5 -
ARTICLE IV CONTRIBUTIONS
4.1 Nonelective Contributions: For each Plan Year, the Employer
in its sole discretion, may make on behalf of each Participant a
Nonelective Contribution to provide benefits for such Participant
and his or. her Dependents, if applicable, under the Plan. The
amount of a Nonelective Contribution shall be calculated for each
Plan Year in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner based on the
Participant's Dependent status category (as elected under Section
3.2), the commencement or termination date of the Participant's
employment during the Plan Year, and such other factors as the
Employer shall prescribe. If the amount of the Nonelective
Contribution exceeds the cost of the benefit coverage selected by
the Participant, no such excess amounts will be currently paid to
the Participant, but shall be credited as deferred compensation.
4.2 ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS:
(a) FLEXIBLE PAY CONTRIBUTIONS: Each Participant shall
authorize the Plan Administrator to withhold from his or her
Covered Compensation for the Plan Year an amount of Flexible Pay
equal to his or her Coverage Expenses in excess of his or her
Nonelective Contribution for such year. Any Flexible Pay which is
withheld form a Participant's Covered Compensation pursuant to
this Section shall be withheld in approximately equal installments
from the amounts payable to the Participant for each pay period
during the Plan Year ( or such portion of the year as the Plan
Administrator may designate). For Employees whose salary during
the year is paid to them over a period of time less than a year,
Flexible Pay amounts will be withheld in installments as
determined by the Plan Administrator. If an Employee becomes a
Participant after the beginning of the first pay period of the
Plan Year, the amount withheld from his or her Covered
Compensation during such year shall be a pro rata share of the
amount that would have been withheld had he or she been a
Participant in the Plan as of the beginning of the Plan Year.
(b) ELECTION: An election under subsection (a) to authorize
withholding of Flexible Pay shall be made on an Election form
submitted in accordance with Section 3.2. an election to have
withheld an amount of Flexible pay which, in the determination of
the Plan Administrator, exceeds the limitation on Flexible Pay set
forth in subsection (a) may in the discretion of the Plan
Administrator be treated as void or an election to have withheld
the maximum amount permissible under such limitation.
4.3 EFFECT OF CHANGE IN DEPENDENT STATUS: If a Participant's
elections change during the Plan Year because of an election made
during a Special Enrollment Period, then in accordance with rules
adopted by the Plan Administrator appropriate adjustments shall
be made in the am6unt withheld from or added to the Participant's
pay for the balance of the year to reflect any changes in the
Participant's Elective Contributions and benefit elections.
- 6 -
ARTICLE V ADMINISTRATION
5.1 ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY AMONG FIDUCIARIES FOR PLAN
ADMINISTRATION:
The Fiduciaries shall have only those powers, duties,
responsibilities, and obligations as are specifically given or
delegated to them under this Plan.
(a) The Employer shall have the sole responsibility for making
the Employer Contributions under the Plan as specified in Article
IV.
(b) The Employer shall have the sole authority to appoint and
remove the Plan Administrator, and to amend or terminate this Plan
in whole or in part.
(c) The Plan Administrator shall
for the administration of the
specifically described herein.
have the sole responsibility
Plan, which responsibility is
(d) Each Fiduciary warrants that any directions given,
information. furnished, or action taken by it shall be in
accordance with the provisions of the Plan authorizing or
providing for such direction, information or action of another
Fiduciary as being proper under the Plan, and is not required
under the Plan to inquire into the propriety of any direction,
information or action.
5.2 ADMINISTRATOR: The Plan shall be administered by the Plan
Administrator which may appoint or employ persons to assist in the
administration of the Plan and may appoint or employ any other
agents it deems advisable, including legal counsel, actuaries,
auditors, bookkeepers and recordkeepers to serve at the Plan
Administrator's direction. All usual and reasonable expenses of
the Plan and the Plan Administrator may be paid by the Employer or
this Plan.
5.3 CLAIMS PROCEDURE: The Plan Administrator, or a party
designated by the Plan Administrator, shall make all
determinations as to the right of a person to an Employer
Contribution under the Plan. If an assertion of any such right by
a Participant or Dependent is wholly or partially denied, the Plan
Administrator, or the designated party, will provide such claimant
a comprehensible written notice within 90 days after receipt of
the claim, unless circumstances warrant an extension of time not
to exceed an additional 90 days, setting forth:
(a) The specific reason or reasons for such denial;
- 7 -
(b) Specific reference to pertinent Plan provisions on which the
denial is based;
(c) A description of any additional material or information
necessary .for the claimant to submit pertinent to the claim and an
explanation of why such material or information is necessary;
(d) A description of the Plan's claim review procedure. The
review procedure is available upon written request by the claimant
to the Plan Administrator, or the designated party, within 60 days
after receipt by the claimant of written notice of denial of the
claim, and includes the right to examine pertinent documents and
submit issues and comments in writing to the Plan Administrator,
or the designated party.
The decision on review shall be made within 60 days after receipt
of request for review, unless circumstances warrant an extension
of time not to exceed an additional 60 days. The decision shall be
in writing and drafted in a manner calculated to be understood by
the claimant, and shall include specific reasons for the decision
with references to the specific Plan provisions on which the
decision is based.
5.4 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS AND DUTIES: The Plan
administrator shall have such powers and duties as may be
necessary to discharge its functions hereunder, including:
(a) to construe and interpret the Plan, decide all questions of
eligibility and determine the amount, manner and time of payment
of any reimbursements hereunder;
(b) to prescribe procedures to be followed by Participants
electing benefit coverages or filing applications for
reimbursements;
(c) to prepare and distribute, in such' manner as the Plan
Administrator determines to be appropriate, information explaining
the Plan;
(d) to receive from Employees, agents and Participants such
information as shall be necessary for the proper administration of
the Plan;
(e) to receive, review and keep on file (as it deems convenient
or proper) reports of the receipts and disbursements of the Plan;
(f) to appoint or employ individuals or other parties to assist
in the administration of the Plan and any other agents it deems
advisable, including accountants, legal counsel, bookkeepers and
recordkeepers, and
(g) to designate or employ persons to
Administrator's fiduciary duties or
Plan,
carry out any of the Plan
responsibilities under the
-0-
5.5 RULES AND DECISIONS: The Plan Administrator may adopt such
rules and procedures as it deems necessary, desirable, or
appropriate for the administration of this Plan. All rules,
procedures and decisions of the Plan Administrator shall be
uniformly and consistently applied to all Participants in similar
circumstances. When making a determination or calculation, the
Plan Administrator shall be entitled to rely upon information
furnished by a Participant, a Dependent, the duly authorized
representative of a Participant or Dependent or the legal counsel
of the Plan Administrator.
5.6 FORMS AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION: The Plan Administrator
may require a participant to complete and file such forms as are
provided for herein and all other forms prescribed by the Plan
Administrator, and to furnish all pertinent information requested
by the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator may rely upon
all such information, including the Participant's current mailing
address.
5.7 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLAN: The complete authority to control
and manage the operation and administration of the Plan shall be
placed in the Plan Administrator, who shall be solely responsible
for the operation of the Plan in accordance with its terms.
ARTICLE VI AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
The Employer shall have the right at any time by instrument in
writing, duly executed and acknowledged, to modify, alter or amend
this Plan in whole or in part, provided however, that no such
amendment shall diminish or eliminate any claim for any benefit to
which a Participant shall have become entitled prior to such
amendment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employer shall have
the limited right to amend the Plan at any time, retroactively or
otherwise, in such respects and to such extent as may be necessary
to fully qualify it as a "cafeteria plan" under existing and
applicable laws and regulations, including Section 125 of the
Code, and if and to the extent necessary to accomplish such
purpose, may by such amendment decrease or otherwise affect
benefits to which Participants may have already become entitled.
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
The Plan herein provided for has been established by the Employer
with the bona fide intention that it shall be continued in
operation indefinitely. However, the Employer reserves the right
at any time to terminate or partially terminate the Plan. Should
the Employer decide to terminate or partially terminate the Plan,
the Plan Administrator shall be notified of such termination in
writing and shall proceed at the direction of the Employer to
take such steps as are necessary to discontinue the operation of
the Plan in an appropriate and timely manner.
- 9 -
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS: Under no circumstances shall the terms
of employment of any Participant be modified or in any way
affected hereby. This Plan shall not constitute a contract of
employment nor afford any individual any right except as contained
herein nor to ba retained in the employ of the Employer.
8.2 NONASSIGNABILITY: To the extent permitted by law,
Participants are prohibited from anticipating, encumbering,
alienating or assigning any of their rights, claims or interests
in this Plan, and no undertaking or attempt to do so shall in any
way bind the Plan Administrator or be of any force or affect
whatsoever. Furthermore, to the extent permitted by law, no such
rights, claims or interest of a Participant in this Plan shall in
any way be subject to such Participant's debts, contracts or
engagements, nor to attachment, garnishment, levy or other legal
or equitable process. Provided however, anything to the contrary
harain notwithstanding, to the extent permissible under applicable
law, a Participant's interest hereunder is subject to all bona
fide and existing debts owed by such Participant to the Plan.
8.3 NO GUARANTEE ON NON-TAXABILITY: The Plan is designed and
is intended to be operated as a "cafeteria plan" under Section 125
of the Code. Nonetheless, neither the Employer nor any Plan
Fiduciary shall in any way be liable for any taxes or other
liability incurred by a Participant or anyone claiming through him
or her by virtue of Participation in this Plan. The Plan does not
prohibit, and indeed contemplates, the payment of taxable benefits
under certain of the Component Plans.
8.4 NONDISCRIMINATION: In accordance with Section 89, 105, &
125 (b) (1) and (2) of the Code, the Plan is intended not to
discriminate in favor of Highly Compensated Individuals as to
eligibility to participate or as to contributions and benefits,
nor to provide more than 25% of all qualified benefits to Key
Employees. If, in the operation of the Plan, more than 25% of the
total qualified benefits are found to be provided to Key
Employees, or the Plan discriminates in any other manner (or is in
danger of so discriminating), then notwithstanding any other
provision contained herein, the Plan Administrator shall reduce or
adjust such contributions and/or benefits under the Plan as shall
be necessary to assure that, in the Judgement of the Plan
Administrator, the Plan thereafter will not discriminate. All
rules, procedures and decisions of the Plan administrator shall be
adopted, made and/or applied in such fashion that they do not
discriminate in favor of Highly Compensated Participants and Key
Employees.
8.5 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY BY EMPLOYER: Whenever the Employer
under the terms of' this Agreement is permitted or required to do
or perform any act or matter or thing, it shall be done and
performed by any officer or individual duly authorized by the
Employer.
8.6 CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT: This Plan shall be construed
according to the laws of the State of California and all
provisions hereof shall be administered according to and its
validity and enforceability shall be determined under the laws of
such state, except where preempted by the Code or ERISA
8.7 HEADINGS: The headings of sections and subsections are for
ease of reference only any shall not be construed to limit or
modify the detailed provisions hereof.
8.8 ENTIRE PLAN STATED: This document sets forth the entire
plan. No other employee benefit or employee benefit plan which is
or may hereafter be maintained by the Employer on a nonelective
basis shall constitute a part of this plan.
- 11 -
CITY OF TEMECULA FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
SCHEDULE A
MONTHLY CITY CONTRIBUTION FOR EACH ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE
EFFECTIVE THE FIRST OF THE MONTH FOLLOWING ONE FULL MONTH
OF ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT IS:
$450 WITH PHEMCA MEDICAL PLAN PARTICIPATION
$434 WITHOUT PHEMCA MEDICAL PLAN PARTICIPATION
SCHEDULE A-1
LIFE INSURANCE:
BANKERS SECURITY GROUP TERM- .12 TO .14/$1,000 OF COVERAGE
" " " ' AD&D .05 " " " "
($50,000 OF COVERAGE ~ $8.50 TO $9.50/M0. PER EMPLOYEE)
LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE:
UNUM 1.01% OF COVERED SALARY TO A MAXIMUM COVERED SALARY
OF $9,009/MO.
SCHEDULE A-1 CONTINUED
HEALTH PLANS:
MONTHLY RATES -
HEALTH NET
LINCOLN NATIONAL
MAXICARE
PARTNERS
ROSS LOOS/CIGNA
PERS-CARE (INDEMNITY)
1 PARTY 2 PARTY FAMILY
128.36 256.72 372.24
134.84 279.12 393.73
128.99 257.76 389.49
149.74 302.48 434.25
141.61 277.04 371.88
204.00 385.00 514.00
DENTAL PLAN:
DENTICARE
$16/MO.
VISION PLAN:
AVP
$9.20/MO. EMPLOYEE ONLY
$15.75/MO. EMPLOYEE AND DEPENDENTS
SCHEDULE A-1 CONTINUED
COLONIAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY PLANS
N6CP
NSCP
E10B
E12B
PA00
PA01
PA02
XXXX
XXXX
Accident & Disability
Sickness & Disability
Cancer
Employee/Dependent Life
Long. Term Care
$16.25/mo.
18.75/mo.
23.50/mo.
29.00/mo.
19.50/mo.
25.50/mo.
31.25/mo.
Individual Rate
(Additional coverages may be offered at the sole discretion
of the City)
SCHEDULE A-2
DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE COMPONENT PLAN
ARTICLE I. FORWARD AND PURPOSE
This Dependent Care Assistance Component Plan is established for
the exclusive benefit of employees and is intended to qualify as
a dependent care assistance program under Sections 125 and 129 of
the Code. The purpose of the Plan is to enable employee
Participants to elect to receive payments or reimbursements of
their dependent care expenses in lieu of their compensation,
which payments are incurred by Participants in connection with
their employment and are excludable from the Participant~s gross
income under Sections 125 and 129 of the Code.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Definitions. Where the following words and phrases appear in
this Plan, they shall have the following meanings, -unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Dependent: (1) General Rule: Any individual who is (i) a
dependent of the Participant who is under the age of 13 and with
respect to whom the Participant is entitled to an exemption under
Section 151(c) of the Code, or (ii) a dependent or spouse of the
Participant who is physically or mentally incapable of caring for
himself. (2) Special Rule for Divorce or Separation of Parents:
Notwithstanding subsection (1), if (i) either Code Section
152(e)(2) (regarding the release by a custodial parent of a claim
to a dependency exemption) or Code Section 152(e)(4) (regarding
various pre-1985 divorce or separation agreements) is applicable
to a child of an Employee, and (ii) such child is under the age
of 13 or is physically or mentally incapable of self-care, then
such child shall be deemed a dependent with respect to the
Employee if such Employee is the custodial parent (within the
meaning of Code Section 152(e)(1) ) of the child. (3) Other
relatives by blood or marriage that are incapable of caring for
themselves meeting the requirements of both Sections 151 & 152 of
the Code.
(b) Dependent Care Assistance Account:
in Article IV hereof.
The
account described
A2-1
(c) Dependent Care Expenses: Expenses incurred by a
Participant which (1) are paid or incurred for the care of a
Dependent' of the Participant or for related household services,
(2) are paid or incurred to a Dependent Care Service Prorider,
and (3) are incurred to enable the Participant to be gainfully
employed for any period for which there are one or more
Dependents with respect to the Participant. Dependent Care
Expenses shall not include expenses paid or incurred for services
rendered outside the Participant's household for the care of
Dependent unless such Dependent is described in Section
2.1(a)(1), or such Dependent regularly spends at least eight
hours a day in the Participant's household. Dependent care
Expenses shall be deemed to be incurred at the time the services
to which the expenses relate are rendered.
(d) Dependent Care Service Prorider: A person who provides
care or their services described in Section 2.1(c)(1) above, but
shall not include (1) a dependent care center (as defined in Code
Section 21(b)(2)(D) ), unless the requirements of Code Section
21(b)(2)(C). are satisfied, or (2) a related individual described
in Code Section 129 (c).
(e) Earned Income: All income derived from wages, salaries,
tips, self employment, and other employee compensation described
in Code Section 32(c)(2) but excluding amounts received under
this Plan or under any other plan providing dependent care
assistance.
ARTICLE III. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE
3.1 Maximum dependent care assistance. The maximum amount
which the Participant may receive in any Plan Year in the form of
dependent care assistance under this Plan shall be the least of
(a) the Participant's Earned Income for the Plan Year, (b) the
actual or deemed Earned Income of the spouse for the Plan year,
or (c) $ 5,000. Provided however, that for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1986, the maximum amount that the
Participant may receive in any taxable year shall not exceed
$5,000. The 85,000 limit shall be reduced to 82,500 in the case
of a separate return by a married individual. In the case of a
spouse who is a Student or is physically or mentally incapable
of caring for himself or herself, such spouse shall be deemed to
have Earned Income of not less than $200 per month if the
Participant has one Dependent and $400 per month if the
Participant has two or more 0ependents.
A2- 2
3.2 Treatment of Onsite Facilities. Except to the extent
provided in regulations, effective for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1986, the amount of dependent care assistance
any Participant may receive under this Plan with respect to an
onsite facility maintained by the Employer shall be based on
utilization of the facility by the Dependent and the value of
services provided.
ARTICLE IV. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE ACCOUNTS
4.1 Establishment of accounts. The Employer will establish
and maintain on its books a Dependent Care Assistance Account for
each Plan Year with respect to each Participant who has elected
under the Flexible Benefits Plan to receive dependent care
assistance for the Plan Year.
4.2 Crediting of accounts. There shall be credited to a
Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for each Plan
Year, as of each date compensation is paid to the Participant in
such Plan. Year, an amount equal to the reduction for dependent
care assistance, if any, to be made in such compensation in
accordance with the Participant's election under the Flexible
Benefits Plan. All amounts credited to each such Dependent Care
Assistance Account shall be the property of the Employer until
paid out pursuant to Article V.
4.3 Debiting of accounts. A Participant's Dependent Care
Assistance Account for each Plan Year shall be debited from time
to time in the amount of any payment under Article V to or for
the benefit of the Participant for Dependent Care Expenses
incurred during such Plan Year. Amounts debited to each such
Dependent Care Assistance Account shall be treated as payments
of those amounts first credited to the Account that have not yet
been treated as paid under this Section.
4.4 Forfeiture of accounts. The amount credited to a
Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for any Plan Year
shall be used only to reimburse the Participant for Dependent
Care Expenses incurred during such Plan Year, and only if the
Participant applies for reimbursement on or before the 30th day
following the close of the Plan Year. If any balance remains in
the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for any Plan
Year after all reimbursements hereunder, such balance shall not
be carried over to reimburse the Participant for Dependent Care
Expenses incurred during a subsequent Plan Year, and shall not
be available to the Participant in any other form or manner, but
shall remain the property of the Employer and the Participant
shall forfeit all rights with respect to such balance.
A2- 3
ARTICLE V. PAYMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE
5.1 Claims for reimbursement. A Participant who has elected
to receive dependent care assistance for a Plan Year may apply to
the Employer for reimbursement of Dependent Care Expenses
incurred by the Participant during the Plan Year by submitting an
application in writing to the Plan Administrator as the Plan
Administrator, setting forth; (a) the amount, date and nature of
the expenses with respect to which a benefit is requested; (b)
the name of the person, organization or entity to which the
expense was or is to be paid; and (c) such other application
shall be accompanied by bills, invoices, receipts, cancelled
checks or other statements showing the amounts of such expenses,
together with any additional documentation which the Plan
Administrator may request.
5.2 Reimbursement or payment of expenses. The Plan
Administrator reimburse the Participant's Dependent Care Expenses
incurred during the Plan Year for which the Participant submits
documentation in accordance with Section 5.1. The Plan
Administrator may, at its option, pay any such Dependent Care
Expenses directly to the Dependent Care Service Prorider in lieu
of reimbursing the Participant. No reimbursement or payment
under this Section 5.2 of expenses incurred during a Plan Year
shall at any time exceed the balance of the Participant's
Dependent Care Assistance Account for the Plan Year at the time
of the reimbursement or payment. The amount of any Dependent
Care Expenses not reimbursed or paid as a result of the preceding
sentence shall be carried over and reimbursed or paid only if and
when the balance in'such Account permits such reimbursement or
payment; provided however, that no Dependent Care Expenses may be
carried over from one Plan Year to the next.
5.3 Report to Participants. On or before January 31 of each
year, the Plan Administrator shall furnish to each Participant
who has received dependent care assistance during the prior
calendar year a written statement showing the amount of such
assistance paid or incurred by the Employer during such calendar
year with respect to the Participant.
A2- 4
SCHEDULE
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT COMPONENT PLAN
ARTICLE I. FOREWORD AND PURPOSE
This Medical Reimbursement Component Plan is established for the
exclusive benefit of employees and is intended to qualify under
Sections 125 and 105(b) of the Code, and is to be interpreted in
a manner consistent with the requirements of the Code. The
purpose of this Component of the Plan is to enable employee
Participants to elect to receive payments or reimbursements of
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses in lieu of compensation, which
payments are excludable from the Participant's gross income under
Sections 125 and 105(b) of the Code.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Definitions. Where the following words and phrases appear
in this plan, they shall have the following meanings, unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
(a) Medical Reimbursement Account:
Article IV hereof.
The account described in
(b) Qualifying Medical Care Expenses: An expense incurred by a
Participant, or by the spouse or Oependent of such Participant,
for medical care as defined in Section 213(d) of the Code
(including without limitation amounts paid for hospital bills,
doctor and dental'bills, drugs and premiums for accident and
health insurance), but only to the extent that the Participant or
other eligible person incurring the expense is not reimbursed for
the expense through insurance or otherwise (other than under the
Plan).
ARTICLE III. MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS
3.1 The maximum amount which a Participant
this Plan in the form of payments or
Qualifying Medical Expenses incurred in any
$2,000.
may receive under
reimbursements for
Plan Year shall be
A3-1
ARTICLE IV. HEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS
4.1 Establishment of accounts. The Employer will establish and
maintain on its books a Medical Reimbursement Account for each
Plan Year with respect to each Participant who has elected under
the Flexible Benefits Plan to receive reimbursement of Qualifying
Medical Care Expenses incurred during the Plan Year.
4.2 Crediting of Accounts. There shall be credited to a
Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for each Plan Year,
as of each date compensation is paid to the Participant in such
Plan Year, an amount equal to the reduction for medical
reimbursements, if any, to be made in such compensation in
accordance with the Participant's election under the Flexible
Benefits Plan. All amounts credited to each such Medical
Reimbursement Account shall be the property of the Employer until
paid out pursuant to Article V.
4.3 Debiting of accounts. A Participant's Medical
Reimbursement Account for each Plan Year shall be debited from
time to time the amount of any payment under Article V to or for
the benefit of the Participant for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred during such Plan Year. Amounts debited to each
such Medical Reimbursement Account shall be treated as payments
of the earliest amounts credited to the Account and not yet
treated as paid under this Section.
4.4 Forfeiture of accounts. The amount credited to a
Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for any Plan Year
shall be used only to pay or reimburse the Participant for
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses incurred during such Plan Year,
and only if the Participant applies for payment or reimbursement
on or before the 30th day following the close of the Plan Year.
If any balance remains in the Participant's Medical Reimbursement
Account for any Plan Year after all reimbursements hereunder,
such balance shall not be carried over to reimburse the
Participant for Qualifying Medical Care Expenses incurred during
a subsequent Plan Year, and shall not be available to the
Participant in any other form or manner, but shall remain the
property of the Employer and the Participant shall forfeit all
rights with respect to such balance.
A3- 2
ARTICLE V. PAYMENT OF MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS
5.1 Claims for reimbursement. A Participant who has elected to
receive medical reimbursements for a Plan Year may apply to the
Plan Administrator for reimbursement of Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred by the Participant during the Plan Year by
submitting an application in writing to the Plan Administrator on
or before the 30th day following the close of the Plan Year, in
such form as the Plan Administrator may prescribe, setting
forth: (a) the amount, date and nature of the expense with
respect to which a benefit is requested; (b) the name of the
person, organization or entity to which the expense was or is to
be paid; (c) the name of the person for whom the expense was
incurred and, if such person is not the Participant requesting
the benefit, the relationship of such person to the Participant;
and (d) the amount recovered, or expected to be recovered, under
any insurance arrangement or other plan, with respect to the
expense. Such application shall be accompanied by bills,
invoices, receipts, cancelled checks or other statements showing
the amounts of such expenses, together with any additional
documentation which the Plan Administrator may request.
5.2 Reimbursement or payment of expenses. The Plan
Administrator shall reimburse the Participant from the
Participant's Medical Account for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses incurred during the Plan Year, for which the Participant
submits documentation in accordance with Section 5.1. The Plan
Administrator may, at its option, pay any such Qualifying Medical
Care Expenses directly to the person providing or supplying
medical care in lieu of reimbursing Participant. No
reimbursement or 'payment under this Section 5.2 of expenses
incurred during a Plan Year shall at any time exceed the balance
of the Participant's Medical Reimbursement Account for the Plan
Year at the time of the reimbursement or payment. The amount of
any Qualifying Medical Care Expense not reimbursed or paid as a
result of the preceding sentence shall be carried over and
reimbursed or paid only if and when the balance in such Account
permits such reimbursement or payment; provided however, that no
Qualifying Medical Care Expenses may be carried over from one
Plan Year to the next.
5.3 Indemnification of Employer by Participants. If any
Participant receives one or more payments for reimbursements
under Article V that are not for Qualifying Medical Care
Expenses, such Participants shall indemnify and reimburse the
Employer for any liability it may incur for failure to pay or
withhold federal or state income or employment tax from such
payment or reimbursements. However, such indemnification and
reimbursement shall not exceed the amount of additional federal
and state income tax that the Participant would have owed if the
payments or reimbursements had been made to the Participant as
regular cash compensation, A3- 3
ITEM NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECUI, A
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Deputy City Clerk
DATE:
September 25, 1990
SUBJECT: Application for Beverage License - Yasohachi Shiojima
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file
BACKGROUND: The enclosed copy of an application for ABC License is for a
restaurant located at 27511 Ynez Road. This is provided for Council's information
and requires no formal action.
CO PY De wet defeci---leferw ell em~Jel
APPUCATION FOI ALCOHOUC IEVEIA6I LICENSE(S)
To: Department of Alcohdic Beverage ContTol
1901 Broadway :"~<'*-"~ ~;" :"~'=~' '~' ~' '
Socramemo, Cotif. 95818 ~k~LIt~:.: .~.'Z~J. ~ ~_~
The undersigned hereby applies for
licenses describe~ as follows:
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
:~riI~iIINAt ya,~'tt~-j'li/;~ZFS./C.F
De N4~ We/re A/levi Tk/I LJBe--ler Hee4l~eHers 041ce Osly
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO.
Applied under Sec. 24044 []
Effective Date: ~ I'~;..
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
~ll~. 2 40 7 ~/BANI~UF'~Y
RECEIP_T, NO.
GEC)~RAPHICAL '
CODE ~ ~. -
Date
IssuecF-3j-~;
Temp. Permit
Effective Date: y-14- -~ ~
FEE LIC.
$
5d.0~j
4. Name of Business
5. Lo<mion of B~sinen--Number and Sireat
City and Zip Code County TOTAL ~0.0~J "47"
6. If Premim Lieend, 7. Are Premi~s Inside
S~w Type of Licen~
8. Mailing Address (if different from 5)--Num~r a~ S~m ~ ~ ~ ~., 17~4
- ave you ever
Beverage Conffol Act or r~ulaHons of the ~dment per-
taining
~. Explain a "YES" answer m items 9 or 10 on an o~hmenl which shall ~ dnmed ~rt of this applica~on.
12. Applicant ~re~ (a) t~t any mana~r employ~ in on-role licen~d ~emises will ha~e all ~-q~li6catlons of a iicensee, and
(b) that he will not viola~ ~ cau~ ~ ~rmit ~ ~ ~ola~ any of the ~ovisions of the Alcoholic ~verage Conlrol Act,
8-30-~
13. STATE OF CALIF~NIA Coun~ 'of ...... ~ ........................ ~ ...........................
14. AffilC~
~ HERE ............................................ - '
....... ......... ...............
A~li
15. STATE ~ CALIffiffiIA C~n~ ~ __i ........................... h~ ..... ~ ...............
16. i~s) of L~s) ' ~ L~ s I~. Licen~ Numbs)
b~H 0 4 1WU
..... '-.c:.:.,,je jontr0J
27511 ~ - F --t ~'
Do ~ W~ Below r~ Lint; For l~ Us ~
City aml ~ Cmk
_-~. Gt._ 92110
[] ............................................. comb ~ .... ~ .......................
O l,,mml:Feed ......... _Peadee .......................... {Mlmm ................ me.k~No ..................
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Deputy City Clerk
September 25, 1990
Claim for Damages - Colleen Farrell vs. City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the Claim for Damages
BACKGROUND: This claim was reviewed by the City's Liability Insurance Carrier
who recommends the City Council deny the Claim of Colleen Farrell.
NOTICE OF CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF .TEMECULA
RETURN TO:
(Government Code ss 910, 910.2)
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. BOX 3000
Temecuta, CA 92390
Attention: City Clerk
CLAIMANT ' S NAME: COLLEEN FARRELL
515 S. Palm
CLAIMA~NT ' S ADDRESS:
Number
Heme t
City
Street
CA 92343
State Zip Code
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM NOTICES REGARDING THIS CLAIM
SHOULD BE SENT (if different than above): Craig F. Castle, Esquire
DAVIS, SAMUELSON, BLAKELY & GOLDBERG, 535 Anton Blvd., Suite 800,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
DATE OF THE ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE: June 4, 1990
Winchester Road at the intersection of
PLACE OF THE ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE: Nicholas Road, City of Temecula
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE (attach
additional pages if more space is needed): Claimant Colleen Farrell
was lawfully and prudently operating her motor vehicle on the above-indicated
date and location when she was struck by a vehicle beinK driven by one
Conrad Anthony Baker. Claimant contends that the subject intersection where
the accident occurred was unsafe, and negligently desiKned, enKineered,
constructed, maintained, improved and/or controled by, inter alia, the City
of Temcula so as to constitute a dangerous condition of public property which caused the
NAMES, IF KNOWN, OF ANY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES CAUSING THE INJURY OR accident in whol~
LOSS: Not known at this time. part.
NAI~ES AI~'D ADDRESS OF WITNESSES:
NAME AD DRE S S
TELEPHONE
1. Colleen A. Farrell - 515 S. Palm, Hemet, CA 92343 925-9976
2. Conrad Anthonv Baker - 441 Altura~. Fa]]Br~n~, ~ Q?~?~ (6]9)723-7374
3. O~ficer M.T. Travino #9169 - California Highway Patrol
NAME AND ADDRESS OF DOCTORS, HOSPITALS WHERE TREATED:
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE
1. Fallbrook Hospital 624 East Eider St., Fallbrook, CA 92028 (619) 728-1191
2. Dr. James W. Landes 521 East Eider St., #104, Fallbrook CA 92028 (619) 728-4773
*3. Dr. David Hisey 521 E. Eider St., #103, Fallbrook, CA 92029 (619) 728-5753
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LOSS, INJURY OR DAMAGE SUFFERED:
Fractured right foot, fractured LI vertebral body, fractured sternum. As a result of
these injuries claimant has required medical attention and has incurreH Ham~ges for
medical expenses to date in the sum of $4,081.14 and in addition. c]a~m~n~ has
sut~ered general damages in the amount of $250,000.00.
*4. Dr. Charles Taft - 521 E. Elder Street, Fall~rook, CA 92028 (619) 728-5753
TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED: $510,000.00 approximately.
THE BASIS OF COMPUTING THE TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED IS AS FOLLOWS:
Damages incurred to date:
Expenses for medical
hospital care:
Loss of earnings:
Special damages for:
property damage
loss of use of vehicle
$ 4,081.14
$ unknown at this time.
$ 5,000.00 approximately
$ 1,000.00 approximately
General Damages
Estimated prospective damages
as far as known:
Future expenses fcr medical
and hospital care:
Future loss of earnings:
Other prospective special
damages:
Prospective general damages:
$ 500,000.00
$ unknown at this time.
$
$
$ 500 , 000 . 00
I/we, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that I/we
have read the foregoing claim for damages and know the contents
thereof; that the same is true of my/our own knowledge and
belief, save and except as to those matters wherein stated on
information and belief, and as to them, I/we believe it to be
true. DAV~ SAM. UELS0~N, B~Y & GOLDBERG
DATED: August !~ , 1990 ,
SiGNA,~ OF CLAIMANT(S)
Attorney for COLLEEN FARRELL
Received in Finance Department this
day of
S.T. GNA?TJRE
FOR CLAIMS RELATING TO INJURY TO PERSON OR PERSONAL PROPERTY,
THIS FORM MUST BE FILED WITH City of Temecula WITHIN SIX MONTHS
FROM THE ACCRUAL OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION. A CLAIM RELATING TO ANY
OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION SHALL BE PRESENTED NO LATER THAN ONE YEAR
AFTER ACCRUAL OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION.
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineering Department
September 25, 1990
Vestin9 Tract Map No. 23267-1
PREPARED BY:
Robert Righetti
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council Approve Vesting Final Tract Map
No. 23267-1, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23267 was submitted to the
County of Riverside on February 29, 1988. It was
approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25,
1988. The applicant requested phasing for units 1, 2, and
3 on May 30, 1989, and approval was given on June 5, 1989
by Riverside County Planning.
Vesting Final Tract Map no. 23267-1 contains 56 lots on 15.94 9ross acres, and is
located southerly of Highway 79 and westerly of Margarita Road. The tract lies
adjacent to the Redhawk Specific Plan (S.P. 217) and the Vail Ranch Specific Plan
(S.P. 223). The developer is Presley Homes of San Diego.
The following fees are required for the development of this tract:
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee JAIl phases, Deferred)
Fire Mitigation Fee (Deferred to Building Permit)
K-Rat Habitat Fee JAIl phases)
$ 90, 150.00
22,400.00
368,536.35
No area drainage fee was required because the tract lies outside the boundary of a
designated watershed boundary as defined by Riverside County Flood Control.
STAFFRPT\VTM23267.-1 1
The following bonds have been posted for this tract:
Faithful
Performance
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
$891,556.00
87,635.00
117,577.00
Survey Monuments
Traffic Signal
Taxes
$ 8,256.00
90,150.00
81,480.00
Labor and
Material
$445,778.00
43,817.50
58,788.50
FISCAL IMPACT: Not determined.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Vesting Final
Tract Map No. 23267-1, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
RR:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Copy of Map
4. Location Map
STAFFRPT\VTM2 3 2 6 7. - 1
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PROJECT NO: Tract No. 23267-1 DATE: September 18, 1990
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewc~'
Total
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Maintenance Retention (10%) for one year
Monument Security $
Plan Check & Inspection Fee: (Offsite Improvements)
Fee Paid to Date (Credit) (Fees Paid to County)
Plan Check & Inspection Fee Due
,,,onument Inspection Fee
Soils Compaction Testing Deposit
Total Plan Check and InspeGtion Fees Due
RCFC Drainage Fee Due ( AC x ) $
Signalization Mitigation Fee (601 Lots x 150) $
Fire Mitigation Fee (400 x 56 Lots) $
$ 891,556.00 $
$ 87,635.00 $
$ 117,577.00 $
$ 1,096,768.00
$ 109,676.00
8,256.00
-0-
90,150.00
22,400.00
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
445,778.00
43,817.50
58,788.50
$ 548,384.00
$ 72,258.24
$ 5,267.00
$ 66,991.24
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ 66,991.24
STAFFRPT\ VTM2 3 2 6 7. - 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23267
DATE:
AMENDEI) NO. 2
EXPIRES:
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
m proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
o employees to attack, set aside, void,.or annul an approval of the County
U ~ ~ of Riverside, its advisory agencies, 'appeal boards or legislative body
· ~ concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23267, which action is brought
) u~ ~ about within the time period provided for in California Government Code
~ Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with ~he State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditiOnally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive_grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
plan shall com~ly w~th the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval,
VESTING TERTAT]VE TRACT NO. 23267 ~nd. #2
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road ri f
ght o way.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
Thesubdivider shall comply with the street improvement' recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 10-07-88,
a copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance.460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.'
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
b the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
tKe Road Con~issioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes,. drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 9-12-88, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside .County Flood Control District's letter dated
10-18-88, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies
within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of
Ordinance 460, appro riate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be coVlected by the Road Commissioner. {Amended at P.C. on t0-19-88
The subdivider shall com~ly with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County hre Marshal's letter dated 9-9-88, a copy of which
is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
in~rovement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
17, Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
VESTI!IG TENTATIVE TRACT II0. 23267 Amd. t2
Coed(tfons of Approval
Page 3
18,
a, All lots shall have a minimum size of 4500 square feet net.
b. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
rovided with other erosion control measures as approved the
~irector of Building and Safety. '
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the followin~ conditions shall be
satisfied: ......
a. Prior to the recordation of the ~'inal'map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
lettars from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Parks Department
County
Prior to the recordation of the final map,.Change of Zone No. 5150
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors. and shall be effective.
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the project site shall be
annexed into C.S.A- 143.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall convey to
the County fee simple title, to all common or con~on open space areas,
free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and
unrecorded} and easements,. except those easements which in the sole
discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to
the County accepting title to such areas, the subdivider shall submit
the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which
documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the
Office of the County Counsel:
1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
z)
A sample document conve ing title to the purchaser of an
tndlvidual lot or unit whtc~ provides that the declaration of
covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by
reference.
l!he declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted
for review shall ~al provide for a term of 60 years, {b) provide for
'the establisl~nent o property owners' association comprised of the
1rEeFING 1TNTX~E TRACT NO. 23267/~d. ~2
Cond(tt~ns af Approval
Page 4
owners of each individual lot or unit and (c) contain the following
provisions verbatim:
'Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to. the
contrary, the following provision shall apply:
The property owners' association established herein shall, if
dornBnt, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the
request of the County of Riverside, and the property o~ners'
association shall unconditionally accept from the County of
Riverside, upon the County's demand, title to all or any part of
the 'con~non area', more par. ticularly described on Exhibit'A'
attached hereto. The decision' to require activation of the
property owners' association and the decision to require that the
association unconditionally accept title to the 'common area'
shall be at the sole discretion of the County of Riverside.
In the event that the common a~ea~ or any part thereof, is
conveyed to the property owners' association, the association,
thereafter shall own such 'common area', shall manage and
continuously maintain such 'common area', and shall not sell or
transfer such common area, or any part thereof, absent the prior
written consent of the Planning Director of the County of
Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property
owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of
each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the right to lien
the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall
be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended
or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent
of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the
County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be
considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or
maintenance'of the 'con~non area'.
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the
Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners'
association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall
control '
· Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and
restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is
recorded.
VESTI!tiTERTATIVETRAL'TID. 23267 And.
Conditions of Appmval
Page 5
19.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irri ation systems until such time as
those operations are the responsigilities of other part es as
i approved
by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet {ECS} shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanentl
filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shal~
be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final
map to the Planning Department and"the' Department of Building and
Safety.
The notice appearing in Section 6.a. of Ordinance No. 625, the
Riverside.County Right-to-Farm Ordinance, shall be placed on the
Environmental Constraints Sheet, with this tract identified therein,
in the manner provided in said Section 6.a., as being located partly
or wholly within, or within 300 feet of, land zoned for primarily
agricultural purposes by the County of Riverside.
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Environmental Impact Report.No. 281 was prepared for
this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning
Department.'
The E.C.S. notes found in the letter from the County Geologist dated
October 12, 1988, a copy of which is attached, shall be placed on the
Environmental Constraints Sheet.
Prior to the issuance of GP~DING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space
area landscap_~ng and irrigation~plans shall be sul~i.tted_[or ~lanning
~uepartment ~pr~v~l'~r't~e"~h~e "'~f"~eV~lO'~m~'~'t in proc~. The
lans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide
~or the following.
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming,
ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with
-appropriate'as appF~ved by the Planning .
T_ST~ TERTATIVE TRJ~'T R0, Z3Z67 Amd. tZ
~ondtttons of Approval
Page 6
3. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
4. W~ere street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside .of the road
right-of-way.
5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate..native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
6. All existing specime~ trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the sub'ect property shall be sho~n on the project's grading plans
and shatl note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
7. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
b. Any oak trees removed with four {4) inch or larger trunk diameters
shall be replaced on a ten {10} to one {1} basis as approved by the
\.. Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved
~.. landscaping plans. /
c. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a biological resource
protection lan shall be prepared by a qualified biologist detailing
methods o~ t~e significant biological resources and
protecting
implementation of biological mitigation measures as found in County
Environmental Impact Report No. 281. Important resources include the
Nevins Barberry found on site. This plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval.
d. During rading activities, a qualified biologist shall be retained by
the devet that the
oper to monitor the grading activities and to see
approved biolo tcal resource protection plan is implemented. Proof of
retainership sgall be submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety prior to the issuance of building permits. The biologist shall
have the right to halt or divert grading procedures, if necessary, in
order to implement the biological resource protection plan.
e. Prior to issuance of grading permits, an in depth survey of the
existing Archaeological sites shall be undertaken by a qualified
Archaeologist. This survey shall include data collection, test
'~aorings and excavation as deemed necessary by the Archaeologist and as
approved by the Planning Department. At the conclusion of the
investigation, a report 'prepared by the Archaeologist shall be
submitted to the Planning Department and the Archaeological Research
Unit at the University of California of Riverside, for review and a
VESTING TE)ITATIVE TRACT !10. 23267 And. #2
Conditions of Approval
Page 7
determination of completeness. Following approval of the report, the
Planning Department will issue clearance for the release of grading
permits.
f. If any archaeological resources are uncovered during grading
activities or trenching, all activities shall cease and an
archaeologist shall be consulted. Any recommendations of the
archaeologist shall be adhered to. J
g. The old adobe structure found within Open Space lot 603 shall be
preserved. ' ....
h. All existing native specimen t;ees on the subject property shall be
preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they
shall be reiDcared or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the
Planning Director. Replacerent trees shall be noted on approved
landscaping plans.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations
thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by
an appropriate conbination of a special terracing {benching} plan,
increased slope ratio {i.e., 3:1}, retaining walls, and/or slope
planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a
fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall
incorporating the following grading techniques:
natural terrain and
be contour-graded
1} The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building. and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Building and Safety.
VESTING TEXTATIVE TRACT ~0. 23267 Amd. 12
Conditions of Approval
Page 8
20.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and connent on the
proposed grading writh respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to
significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist
and the excavation and grading contractor shall be, arranged. When
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the
authority to tenl~orarily divert, redirect or halt;grading activity to
allow recoverl~ of fossils ......
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for
any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the
~rith public facility financing measures. A cash sum of o
~ollars {_$.iO_D]_per lot/unit shall be deposited with the Riverside
County Department of Building and Safety as mitigation for public
l~_i.bra_ry development.
/
Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Buildin
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustica?
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
ap lied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient noise s
interior level to 45 Ldn and exterior noise levels to
65 Ldn.
CO
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County
Cmq~rehensive General Plan.
Prior to issuance of building permits, detailed park site and riparian
area develop~_ent lens shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. ll~ese plans shall conform with guidelines found in the
approved design manual {Exhibit M}. The parks shall include active
recreational features such as picnic tables, barbecue areas, tot lots,
etc. Rec~mnendations found in the letter from George Balteria of the
County Parks Department, a copy of which is attached, shall be
included in the design of the parks and Open Space Areas.
e. Development of this project shall conform to the recommendations found
in County Geologic Report No. 488.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT RO. 23267 Amd. t2
Conditions of Approval
Page 9
he
For the security and safety of future residents, the following crime
prevention measures shall be considered during site and building layout
design.
a, Proper lighting in open areas;
b. Visibility of doors and windows from the
buildings;
c. Fencing heights and materials;
street and between
d. Adequate off-street parking; and
e. A clearly understood method of street numbering to facilitate
emergency response.
Prior to the issuance of building permitS, 'composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects of the tract re~ui~ing
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not li:.':'.~
to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and indivi~;al
front yard landscaping, and shall conform to the standards set forth
in the tract's approved Design Manual (Exhibi't
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval.
All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automati~
irrigation.
A plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department ~ursuant to
Section 18.30 of Ordinance No. 348 accompanied by al applicable
filing fees, as a plot plan that is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act is not transmitted to any governmental
agency other than the Riverside County Planning Department. The plot
plan shall ensure the conformance of the final site development with
the tract's approved Design Manual (Exhibit M}, and shall contain the
following elements:
A final site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all
setbacks, fences and/or walls, and ~oor plan and elevation
assignments to individual lots.
One (1) color and materials sample board {maximum size of 8 X 13
inches by 3/8 inch thick} containing precise color, texture and
material swatches or photographs (which may be from suppliers'
brochures). Indicate on the board the name, address and phone
YESTING TERTATZVE TRACT I10. Z3267 And.
Conditions of Approval
Page 10
21.
numbers of both the sample board preparer and the project
a plicant, tract number, and the manufacturer and product numbers
~ere possible (trade names also acceptable}.
One (1} cop of the architectural elevations colored to represent
the selectePdYcolor combinations, with symbols keyed to the color
and materials board. The written color and material descriptions
shall be located on the elevation.
Six {6} copies of each of glossy.photographic color prints {size B
X I0 inches} of both color and materials board and colored
architectural elevations for permanent filing, hearing body review
and agency distribution. All writing must be legible.
Said plot plan shall require the approval of the Planning Director
prior to the issuance of any building permits for lots included within
the plot plan. The submittal of plot plans prior to the issuance of
d
buil ing permits may be phased provided:
1. A separate plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for each phase, which shall be accompanied by appropriate filing
fees.
2. Each individual plot plan shall be approved by the Planning
Director prior to the issuance of building permits for lots
included within that plot plan.
A fencing plan shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
This plan shall be in substantial conformance with the Design Manual
{Exhibit M} and take into account any recommendations of the required
noise study.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
All landscaping and irrigation shall' be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
b. Prior to occupancy, walls and fences shall be installed in accordance
with approved plans.
Notwithstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study
is required for ~oise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
YESTIIIG TENTATZVE TRACT RO. Z3267 And. f2
Conditions of Approval
Page 11
GN:sc;bc
10/12/88
Prior to occupancy, the neighborhood ark site associated with that
phase of development shall be deveroped in accordance with approved
plans.
Prior to occupancy, the well site open space lots associated with that
1 xh approved Landscaping Plans:.
.I
t'
o>m--.
L. Roy D.
lOAD COIIkUSSIONER · COUNTY SURVEYOR
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER 6 COU UB '~'Y~j~. ]988 ~
October 7, 1988
RIVEHs~ut- GOUNT'Y
PLANNING DEPARTMEN"[
COUNTY AOMIN!ST~-ATIV[ CENTEli
Riverside County Planning Corrrnisston
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Tract Map 23267 - Amend ~2
Schedule A - Team I
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and'drainage courses with
appropriate Q'so and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map
to be resuEmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Roan
Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of di'version of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructi~ adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
existing faciliti'es or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
October 7, 1988
Page. 2
3. Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
4. 'A' Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 101, {76'/100).
5. 'B' Street (James Avenue) shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with Modified County Standard No. 102
(64'/82'), ~.'
6. 'S'~re*~eet and 'C' h of' Creek Lane} shall be improved
within the dedicated right of way in .accordance with County
Standard No. 103, Section A. (44'/66').
7. The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the
'/60').
e
The landdivider shall comply with the Caltrans recommend~~s
outlined in their l~tter dated Merch 30, 1988 (a. copy of which
attached), prior to the recordation of the final map.
9. The landdivider shall provide utility clearahce from Rancho Calif-
ornia Water District prior to the recordation of the final map.
<A copy Of the final nep shall be submitted to Caltrans, District 08,
Post Office Box 231, San Bernardino, California 92403; Attention:
Project Development for review and approval prior to recordation.
11. The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%.
12. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Department.
13. State Highway 79 shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter
'located 55 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete
Trr.~.i~' l(ap 23267- Amend #2
bctober 7, 1988
PaS~ -31
paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as
determined by Caltrans within .a 71foot-half_width dedicated right
of way in accDrdance with State Standard No. A2-8~
14. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A
minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be ~constr. ucted
between driveways.
15. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a
debris retention wall shall be constructed at the-street right of
way line to prevent silting of'.sidewalks as approved by the Road /
Commissioner.
16. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet mea'sured from the face
of curb.
t
17. 'T" S re be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33'}.
19.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 400' and 401 (curb sidewalk}.
An access road (located north of Temecula Creek along the extension
of 'B" Street, James Avenue to the east) to the nearest paved road
maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section
B, {32~/60') at a grade and alignment as approved by the Road
Conmnissioner. This is necessary for circulation purposes.
Primary and secondary access roads (at the locations of Loma tinda
Street and the extension of Park Avenue, 'S" Street) to the nearest
paved road maintained by the County shall be constructed within the
public right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106,
Section B~__~32'/60') at a grade and align'i~nt')'s-a~p~oi'e~Fb~'~h~
Roa~C~sstoner, ~nis is also necessary for circulation purposes.
· T~'~c:~ l~ap 23267 - Amend
'Oc+~ober 7, 1988
· Page) 4
21.
22.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the I~iverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
the developer choose to defer the ~ime of t enter into
a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the
time of issuance of a building permit.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending
a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries, at a grade and
alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner.
£ompletion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for
maintenance by County. . .....
Electrical and communications t~enches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
24. Asphalttc emulsion {fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen-days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of.the State
Standard Specifications.
25. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and off-set. cUl-de-sa___~cs shall be
constructed throughout the landdivision.
/'
26. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
27.
30.
Lot access shall be restricted on State Highway 79, "A" Street and
'B" Street (james Avenue) and so noted on the final map.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope
lasements as approved by the Road Department.
All centerline intersections shall be at gO° with a minimum 50°
ta~ng~nt measured from_f3owjine.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be
coordinated with Rancho Villages Assessment District ~15g and TR
23063.
:- i
TraC{.lbp 23267; Amend #2
bctober 7, 1988
Page 5
31.' Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area {CSA}
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall
file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of
a 'Lighting Assessment District' in accordance with Governmental
~de Section 56000.
32.
A striping plan is required for State Hwy. 79, 'A" Street, and "B"
Street {james Avenue). The removal of the existing striping shall
be the responsibility of the applicant. Traffic;.signing and
striping shall be done by County fo.r.ces with all incurred costs
borne by the appl i cant.
~ /
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Road Division Engineer
TC
FROM:
County of Riverside
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. September 12, 1988
DATE:
TRACT MAP 23267, Amended No. 2
Environmental Health Services has reviewed Tract Map 23267, '
Amended No. 2 dated September 6, 1988. Our current
£omments will rpm~in as stated in our letter dated April 12, 1988.
SM:tac ,.
C~N. FOIL~ 4. {by.
DEPARTMENT
of HEALTH
v ,L
3576 IIT'N ITREET MA4.L (POST OFFIC'[ IOX 1370) · RIVeRSiDE, CA.
C,A
April 12. 1968
IM
~ CA.. e2&O/
,APR 18 1988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92502
Attn: Greg Neal
;'RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE; Tract Map 23267; That portion of Parcel 1. 2. 3 and 4 of
Parcel Map 18993 recorded in Book 134, Pages 13 through 18
of Parcel Maps in Riverside County, California.
(591 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has
No. 23267 and recommends that:
reviewed Tentative Map
A water system shall be Installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet. along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint speclficatfons. and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system [o the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. S, Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22. Chapter 16. and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California, when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Grog Neal
April 12, 1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certification: "!
certify that the deslgn of the water system in Tract
Map 23267 ls in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water Dlstr~ct
and that the water service,storage and dlstr. lbution
system will be adequate to provide water service to
such tract. This certification does not constitute a
guarantee that it will supply.water to such tract at
any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire
protection or any other purpose" This certification
shall be s~gned by a responsible official or the water
company. The.~!~ns must be submltted to the County
Survey~/'s Office to review at least two weeks ~r]or
to the reouest for the recordatlon of the final maD.
Th~s Department has a statement from_~he__Rancho Cal=forn~a
Water D~strlct agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivlsion'%~'~and providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. ]t will be necessary for the financial'
arrangements to be made prior to the reco~ation of the
final map.
This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal
~ater Dlstrict agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Mealth Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the lnternal pipe diameter, 1ocat~on of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specificaticn5
and the 'size of the sewers at the ~unction of the new system
~O the existing system. A single plat indicating locatlon
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be s~gned by a
registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certification: "I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Map 23267 is in accordance with the
~ewer system expansion plane of the Eastern Municipal Water
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract.' The Elans must be submitted to the Coun~X
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Three
ATTN: 6reg Neal'
April 12, 1988
Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks ~rior to the
Z_erJuest for the recordation of the fxnal m%~.
It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior to the recordatiOn of the final map. -
It viII be necessary for the annexation proceed'~ngs to be
completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map.
San= tarjan
Environmental Health Services
SM: tac
IC~/h/ETH !,. EDWARDS
! 1981 MARKrT lTRerL-r
t
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
October 18, 1988
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention:
Regional Team No. 1
Greg Neal
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This is a proposal to divide approximately 194 acres for single
family housing in the Temecula area. The site is located along
both sides of Temecula Creek about 1200 feet west of Margarita
Road.
This project is located on the floor of Temecula Valley and is
.,,subject to both riverine flows from Temecu!a Creek and sheeting
offsite storm flows from two other sources. The main course of
Temecula Creek flows through the center of t~e tract. Storm
water from a 800 acre watershed to the north traverses the north-
ern half of this project. Due to poorly defined drainage pat-
terns, it is probable that large amounts of storm water emanating
from tributaries north of Temecula Creek and from far to the east
may sheet west, generally parallel to Temecula Creek, and across
the site. Unless these storm flows are dealt with by upstream
development in the watershed, the developer will have to con-
struct drainage facilities to protect this project.
Onsite Storm runoff is proposed to be conveyed via both streets
and storm drains to Temecula Creek Channel. Several acres of
onsite area at the southeastern tract boundary is proposed to be
diverted to the neighboring development. The applicant (Thotem
America 'Corp.) has submitted documentation that the developer to
east (Great American Development Co.) plans to accept this run-
off. A document showing evidence of this agreement should be
submitted to the District for review prior to recordation of the
final map.
The improvements to Temecula Creek are proposed as a part of
Assessment District 159. The District's interest in the con-
figuration of the main channel is limited to its adequacy as a
flood protection facility. It should be noted that the present
design does not allow for habitat mitigation within the channel,
nor does it specifically provide for ~gint use of the facility
( e.g. , equestrian. _or _bicycle -trai!.~l. A c~e f~ ~h~l"~n--- d !-~ .
figuration or right of way width may require redesign of this
proposal.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re-- Vesting Tract 23267
Amended No. 2
-2-
October 18, 1988
The developer's Exhibit "B" proposes to collect storm flows from
the 800 acre canyon at De Portola Road and convey them to
Temecula Creek in a trapezoidal channel. Two collection dikes
are proposed on the east side of Margarita Road to capture storm
flows traveling parallel to Temecula Creek. These flows would
combine with the northern stream just north of Highway 79.
Following are the District's recommendations: ~'
1. Temecula Creek Channel should be constructed throught
this tract as shown on the'tentative map.
Both Temecula Creek Channel and the drainage facilities
proposed to convey storm flows from the north and east
should be built to District standards. Some of these
facilities are proposed to be constructed by Assessment
District 159. If these have not been installed by the
time grading permits are requested, it will be necessary
for this tract to construct drainage structures necessary
to protect it from tributary 100-year storm flows.
Evidence of a viable maintenance mechanism should be sub-
mitted to the District and County for review and approval
prior to recordation of the final map.
A portion of the proposed project is in a flood plain and
may affect "waters of the United States", "wetlands" or
"jurisdictional streambeds", therefore, in accordance
with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance
Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through
73) and County Ordinance No. 458:
A flood study consisting of HEC-2 calculations, cross
sections, maps and other data should be prepared to
the satisfaction of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) and the District for the purpose of
revising the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map of
the project site. The submittal of the study should
be concurrent with the initial submittal of the
related project improvement plans and final District
approval will not be given until a Conditional Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR) has been received from FEMA.
A copy of appropriate correspondence and necessary
permits from those government agencies from which
approval is required by Federal or State law (such as
Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish
and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the
District prior to the final District approval of the
project.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Vesting Tract 23267
Amended No. 2
-3-
October 18, 1988
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements'obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be
recorded and a copy submitted to the DistriCt prior to
recordation of the final map. ~'
The 10 year s~Drm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 Ve~r__~Qrm._flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria is e~Ce'e~ed, A~T~FiBnal drainage facilities
should be installed.
7. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergenc~...es~ape..should also be provided.
8. The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or
diverted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review ~
prior to the recordation of the final map.
9. Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or
offsite construction and grading.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to
recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be
approved prior to issuance of grading permits.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Vesting Tract 23267
Amended No. 2
-4-
October 18, 1988
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Bob Cullen of
this office at 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
NNETH L. EDWARDS
ON
, H .H. KASHUBA
· Civil Engineer
cc:' RANPAC
BC:bab
OCT 13 1988
RIV~blu~ CUU~TY
~LANNING DEPARTMENT
October 13, 1988
Mr, Richard MacMort, Supervising Planner
Riverside County Planning Department
4060 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501 .....
SUBJECT:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map Number 23267
'Dear Mr. MacHott:
The following summarizes our findings regarding the fiscal
impact analysis for the project identified above. The
appendix attached summarizes the basic assumptions used in
the analysis. Please note that these results reflect the
current levels of .service provided by the County based on
Fiscal Year 1986 - 1987 actual costs (per capita factors)
and Departmental and Auditor-Controller review of operations
end facility costs for services reviewed using case study
analysis. Staff to the Growth Fiscal Impact Task Force and
Departments are currently reviewing service levels provided.
end the need to increase the levels of service. Current
findings are that existing levels of service are not
adequate in most cases. Should the desired level of service
be utilized in the fiscal analysis performed, it would
significantly increase the costs associated with this
development-
C[::X~Y FUND
(Operations and
Maintenance)
County General
Fire
Free Library
SUBTOTAL COUNTY
Road Fund
GRAND TOTAL
FISCAL IMPACT
AFTER BUILDOUT
($69,511)
($10,360)
($329)
($80,200)
$6,230
($73,790)
CUMULATIVE FISCAL
IMPACT AT BUILDOUT
($15,426}
($20,720)
($656)
($36,804)
$12,46o
($24,344)
Robert T. Andersen Admlntstrattve Center
40~ LEMON S111EET · 12TH FLOOR, RIVERSIDE. CAL~O.RN!~. 92581 · [714) 787-2544
l.dk,. CA 92201
(619) 342-8~86
RlYuc,.ut; COUNTY
riPE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPET'~l'1ON wrfl-I THE
CAL~ORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PT~TECTION
RAY HEBRARD
fiRE a-fIEf
9-9-88
Rannlt~ & Er~inetring ~
4080 Lemon Stn~, Suite I I L
Rivehide, CA 92501
(7 ~ 4) 787-~606
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,
ATTN: CILE~ NEAL -"'
RE: TRACT 23267 - AMENDED #2
Wfrh respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule hA" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2½") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant.
Minimum fire flow shall be lO00 GPH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire
Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
slgned/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with
,the .following certification: "'l certify that the design of the water system is
In accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Department."
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant/developer shall provide
alternate or secondary access as approved by the County Road Department.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of
payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
Subject: ~rac~ 23267
Page 2
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RtYHOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
George S. Tatum, Planning OEficer
;.
VF,=I iDF.. COURC,u
PLAfirlifiG DEPA::IEITIErlC
October 12, 1988
Highland Soils Engineering
1832 S. Comercenter Circle, Suite A
San Beraardino, CA 92408
Attention: Mr. Robert C. Manning Mr. Warren L. Sherling
Mr. William T. Altmeyer
SUBJECT:
Alqutst-Priolo/Liquefaction Hazard
Job No.: 07-6556-010-00-00
Vesting Tract 23267
County Geologic Report No.488
APN:926-016-O02,003,010,011.012,013
Rancho California Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed your report entitled "Fault Hazard and Preliminary
Geotechntcal Investigation, 242~ Acres, Southwest of the Intersection of
~rgarita Road and State Highway 79, Rancho California, Riverside County, CA,"
dated February 3, 1988, and your response to County seismic/geologic reviews,
dated~oril 19. 1988, and July 27, 1988. ,
Your report determined that:
Exploratory fault trenches 1,3 and 4 exposed fault offsets associated
with the active Wildomar fault. The location of this fault is shown on
Plate 1A, Geotechnical Map of your report.
?_. llba seismic data for the Elsinore (Wildomar fault) Fault Zone located
'on site is as follows:
Maximum Probable Earthquake -7.0
'(Richter Magnitude)
Peak Ground Acceleration - 0.63g
Duration of Strong Notion - 30 seconds
3. The settlement potential under seismic loading for the on-site and
bedrock materials is mderate to very low. respectively.
4. l~e potential for liquefaction is considered high in the larger
drainage courses within Pauba and Wolf Valleys on the site.
Liquefaction may occur in the form of differential settlement, sand
boils. and lateral spreading.
4'1380 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
(Tqzi) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Highland Soils Engineering
-2-
October 12, 1988
5. A minor landslide area may be located at the central portion of the
site, shown On Plate 1A, Geotechnical ~p.
The alluvial soils generally are considered to have a low expansion
· potential. The siltstones within the Pauba formation on site can be
moderately to highly expansive.
7. The fine grained alluvial soils in the major drainage courses'are
generally compressible in the upper five feet.
8. The current area designated as the 1O0-year floodplaih for Temecula
Creek exceeds the seismic-induced flood tnundation. area.'that would
result during instantaneous failure of Skinner or Vail Reservoirs.
Only the lowest area of Pauba Valley'would be affected.
g. Ground fissure development is considered a significant hazard within
the southwest portion of the site, due to the presence of active
faulting in this area.
Your report recoamended that:
A 50 foot setback zone from both sides of the Wildomar Fault Zone is
required for human occupancy structures. This setback is designated on
Plate 1A, Geotechincal Map.
The following will mitigate the liquefaction potential on this site:
a. A co~acted fill mat along with a gravel blanket and additional
footing reinforcement should be used for structures.
-b. Structural setbacks from tops of fill slopes toeing into
liquefaction prone areas should be used.
c. Lateral spreading hazards along Pauba Creek are mitigated by the
placement of Loma Linda Drive and the 100 foot wide Building
Setback area. This affects Lots 490-503
d. Grading along Temecula Creek will involv~ the placement of upwards
of 15 feet ofcompacted fill over the 8-10 feet of recommended
alluvial removals, in order to nearly eliminate the potential for
liquefaction induced loss of bearing or sand boils.
e, In order to reduce a slight possibility of lateral spreading along
lemecuta Creek for Lots 160, 161, 174-176, 185, 186, 189,-221,223
and Z24;etther the building setback should be increased to twice
the slope height or post-tensioned slabs and additional foundation
reinforcement for lots 205-221,
f The (leotechnical engineer should review the project grading plans
to develop any further design information.
Alluvial soils should be overexcavated in the larger existing drainage
and canyon areas to a minimum depth of 5 feet. Where feasible total
removal of loose alluvial soils to bedrock is reconmended. As an
alternative, settlement monuments and monitoring my be used in the
area with thick alluvium.
Htghland Soils Enlngeering
October 12, 1988
4. Additional investigation of the possible landslide located at the
central portion of the site is recommended prior to site grading.
The 50 foot humn occupancy setback to the northeast and the property
bounds to the southwest of the located active fault will mitigate the
portenttel hazard of ground fissure development on the site.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner consistent
with the present 'state-of-the-art' and satisfies the requirements of the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, the associated Riverside County
Ordinance No. 547, and additional information required under the California
Environmental Quality Act review. Final approval of this report is hereby
given. ~.
We recommend that the following conditions be'satisfied before recordation of
the final parcel map or County permits associated with-this project:
The 'Fault Hazard Zone' shown on Plate 1A, {Geotechnical Hap) in your
report shall be delineated on the Environmental Constraints Sheet
(E.C.S.), and the area in between the setback lines shall be labeled
'Fault Hazard Area.'
2. A note shall be placed on the E.C.S. stating:
'This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for
human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area. This
constraint affects parcels 490 through 504, 602 and 603."
3. Notes shall be placed on the final land division map stating:
(a}
'County Geologic Report No. 488 was prepared for this property on
February 3, 1988, and is on file at the Riverside County Planning
Department. Specific items of concern in this report are as
follows: active earthquake faulting, liquefaction, ground
fissures, landsliding, seismic induced flooding, and uncompacted
trench backfill.'
(b)
'This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures
for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard
Area. The constraint affects parcels 490 through 504, 602 and
603, as shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints
Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.
A copy of the final map and Environ_m~_.~tai_C..O.~s_t.r. ai_n_ts_Sheet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department Engineering Geologist for review
and approval,
Htghland Soils Entngeertng
-4-
October 12, 1988
The exploratory trenches were backfilled, but not compacted, and shall
be compacted under the direction of the project geotechnical engineer
if any structures are contemplated for construction over any portions
of these trenches.
Very truly yours,
SAK:al
c.c. Ranpat - Dave Dillon
CO!4G - Earl Hart
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARll~ENT
Roger S. S~reeter - P,l~:tng Di 'ector
Building & Safety - Norm Lostbom {2}
Greg Neal - Team I
The following special circumstances apply to this project:
1. The developer assumptions included a factor of 2.1
persons per dwelling unit. CAO staff utilized a factor of
2.69 persons pe~ household, which is closer to the
countywide average for this type of unit.
2. CAO staff has reviewed library costs with Library
personnel and incorporated actual operations and maintenance
costs into the analysis. Using Library staff estimates of
the costs of providing the current level of service,
considering the increase in population, this project should
result in one-tim capital factlity costs of . $76,263
(library space, volumes) and ongoing annual operations and
maintenance costs of $14,594. Library staff has indicated
that the current level of service is not adequate.
3. Flood Control staff has indicated that flood control
facilities constructed within Zone 7 are unlikely to be
sufficiently funded for maintenance costs. Current
estimates indicate that funding shortages should occur for
the next ten years. Suggested mitigation measures include a
cash deposit by the project developer or use of an
assessment mechanism. The amount of deposit would be
determined by a present value analysis and project timing.
The cost of maintaining flood control facilities
not be known until final design phases, when facility
have been fully identified. Flood Contrdl staff
therefore, condition project approvals to identify a
of financing facility maintenance and operation
necessary) prior to recordation of subdivisions.
will
needs.
will,
means
.(if
Based on the analysis and assuming that the average sales
price of the units will be $142,555, overall Vesting
Tentative Tract 23267will have a negative fiscal impact at
buildout ef $24,344. Afte~ buildout, this project will have
an annual :negative fiscal impact to the County of $73,970 at
current levels of service.
Znitial Review By:
Review Approved By:
- q
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL LETTER
COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
October 7, 1988 /'.,,.-,-~ ~(~'. ~'~
./-
11): Greg Neal/..!~annin Department
e e
FH: George Balt rla, Chief Park Plann r ,
SUBJECT: TT 23267,23299 Old Vail Ranch, EIR 281
l~e County 'Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced document and
offers the following recomendations.'
Parks and Recreation
Our department supports the extension of a regional open space/natural green
belt along the Temecula Creek. This is consistent with other specific plans
and development along this creek. Our department will require an offer of
dedication of this area be made to the Parks Department on the final tract
maps. (Regional Park 'A'.)
Regional Park 'B' is actually a local park and is located in a strategic
position to serve as a conwnunity park. It does not qualify as a regional park
area due to its limited size; however, the historic adobe contained within
this area can be successfully preserved with a conxnunity park setting and
interpreted.
Overall, the parks contained within this development show a lack of large
sports fields capable of accommodating organized sports activities and this
may need to be examined,
Cormunity and neighborhood parks should be developed to the satisfaction of
the ]ocal county service area (CSA).
Recreation Trails
Regional Park 'A' along the Temecula Creek correctly identified the need for a
primary equestrian trail as shown. The trail location and development should
be to county standards.
As indicated, on the attached exhibit No. 1., a Class I bicycle lane needs to
be provided for along the Temecula Creek. This should be developed to county
standards and have connecting access to local street Class II bicycle lanes.
Mr. Greg Neal, Planning Department
Page 2
On the attached exhibit No. l, provision for access to the Temecula Creek by a
secondary riding and hiking trail must be incorporated into the project. This
will utilize t~e proposed reinforced concrete box culvert under State
Highway 79 and provide access to the trails in the creek for residents to the
north of this project. This access/secondary trail should be developed to a
mini,m,m width 12 feet and to county standards.
Coordination of the proposed undercrossing improvement is requested by our
deparb~ent, i.e., rip rap, placement and access, and minimum overhead
clearance. (See attached detail.)
I
Cultural/Historic Resources
'lhe proposed site of the Old Vail Ranch project is in an extremely sensitive
area for cultural resources. In the thorough cultural resources assessment he
prepared, archaeologist Christopher Drover discusses the historic two-story
adobe Vail Ranch House and a large Lutseno Indian archaeological site.
The Parks Department's History Division commends Ranpac Engineering
Corporation for its sensitive consideration of these cultural resources in the
EIR. We concur with the proposed mitigation measures of recovering artifacts
from the archaeological sites and making these available to the public in an
interpretire center, and preserving the Vail Ranch House through
rehabilitation and adaptive reuse. A library, community center, small museum
or restaurant would all be appropriate uses for the house, as would be
continued residential use if properly maintained.
In addition to the mitigation measures mentioned in the EIR, the Parks
Department requests full-time monitoring by a qualified archaeologist during
the grading process. This is essential due to the extreme likelihood of
unknown archaeological resources existing on the site.
If any historic resources surface, Diana Seider, History Division Director,
should be notified at (714)787-2551. Should you have questions regarding
parks, recreation, or Grail matters, please contact me or Marc Brewer of this
department.
GB/IOIBG
Paul Romero, Director, Parks Department
Sam Ford, Deputy Director, Parks Department
Diana Seider, History Division Director, Parks Department
Narc ;Brewer, Assistant Planner, Parks Department
m
... ~.=~. ] .,, ]
~t, a:l em
,/
12' MIN.
m
8' MIN. S,~ND BED
.
RIVERaIDE COUNTY
..
TYPICAL OVEPJ..IEAD CLEARANCE
R, C, B, DRA Z NAGE__~"TRUCTURF
H,. . R.~ BREIiER
10/11/88 i'''~i ' '
-'. . =.~._ . ....
·
PARKI DEPARTMENT
l"of 1
N.T.S.
DATE: Yebruary 29, 1~88
TO: Assessor
Bu~.ldtng and ~afety
Surveyor - Dave Duds
Road Department
~ealth -Ralph Luchs
~lre Protec~ion
Ylood Control District
Yish & Game
LAFCO, S Paisley
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth X. Davidson
=:IiVE::I iDE COUnC,u
, PLAnninG DEPA=IC!ilEnC
County Aviation
Comissioner Bresson
RiVE.qSID.r.: C:':: tN"Y
pLANNIr,)G D6P,:-.R'7 ;:,'.SNT
Rancho Calif. Water
Eastern Municipal Water
Southern Calif. Edison
Southern Calif. Gas
General Telepjone
Dept. of Transportation #8
Temecula Elem~
Elsinore Union High School
Temecula Chamber of Conxnerce
)it. Palomar
Sierra Club
Val leyWide Parks
VESTING TRACT 23267 - (tm-1) - E.A. 32544
- Thotem American Corp. - Rancho Pacific
- Rancho California Area - First
Supervlsorial District - South of Righvay
79 and West of Margarita Road - R-R Zone
- Schedule A - 193.7 acres into 596 lots
- Concurrent Cases CZ 5150, VTR 23299 -
Mod 120 - A.P. 926-160-010 to 013;
926-016-002-003
/
County Parks
Please revie~ the case described above, along vlth the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for April 28, 1988. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to April 14, 1988 in order that ve
may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have say questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
G£eg Neal at 787-1363
Planner
COEHEN~S:
Vesting Tract 23267 should be required to annex to an appropriate
a~ency which provides park and recreation services. Annexation will
mitigate impacZs of increased population to be served and fees (park
development), shall be used to acquire and develop a park site.
PLEA3E print na~ a am aI Manager, Valley-Wide Recreation and par
Distric
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
DnfcDqmr~c r-a t tl~t"'~l~l'dla qgRt11
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
__~,~MATHEWS ' LAKE PE(~RRIS SAN JACINTO
PERRIS HEMET
"""'"~'~'-""°~,.;;:o,..~ ),,,,,.,,~.,=~',-,.,%..~
(~¢::~ SUN
CITY 9
LAKE ELSINORE / SLK/~~
RANCHO )RNIA
TEMECULA
t_,__
RAINBOW
PROJECT SITE
LE f
VICINITY MAP
CAROLINA
,,t rn) rr)
U [L~
ITEM NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineering Department
September 25, 1990
Acceptance of Public Improvements in
Tract No. 20987
PREPARED BY:
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
DISCUSSION:
Robert Righetti
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in
Tract No. 20987, AUTHORIZE the reduction of street,
sewer, and water bonds and release of monument bond,
and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
On September 1, 1987, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with:
Windsor Projects, Inc.
29377 Rancho California Road, Ste. 200
Temecula, CA 92390
for the improvement of streets, the installation of sewer
and water systems, and survey monumentation.
Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety
bonds issued by:
Insurance Company of the West
as follows:
Bond No. 029138 in the amount of $555,000.00 to
cover street improvements.
Bond No. 029138 in the amount of $132,500.00 to
cover sewer improvements.
STAFFRPT\TR20987
Bond No. 029138 in the amount of $101,500.00 to
cover water improvements.
Bond No. 029139 in' the amount of $15,000.00 to
cover survey monumentation.
Bond No. 029138 in the amount of $394,500.00 to
cover materials and labor.
The following items have been completed by the developer
or his engineer in accordance with the approved plans:
1. Required street, sewer, and water
improvements.
2. Survey Monumentation.
The inspection and verification process relating to the
above items has been completed by the County of Riverside
Road Department and City Staff agrees with the
recommendation to reduce/release the subdivision
improvement bonds. Therefore, it is appropriate to
reduce/release these bonds as follows:
Streets:
Sewer:
Water:
Monumentation:
$499,500.00
$119,250.00
$ 91,350.00
$ 15,000.00
The remaining 10% of the original faithful performance
bond amounts are to be retained for one (1) year
guarantee period as follows:
Streets: $55,500.00
Sewer: $13,250.00
Water: $10,150.00
RR:ks
STAFFRPT\ TR2 0 9 8 7 2
..//XiSTING ZONIN6. I TR 20987 ...........
~ ./~ ' ~!'
z A-2-20F R-R
A-2-20 ,~ R_..~~ ),,;ll "/..
~ '.,:"~:,~ ·. /--' .'
:' ,~" R-~ "1 .
4~. · ': R -I - IC.ooo
c-I/c-P
R-2
P C-I/C-P
·
~ lilt
R-2-
A-2-20
4,000
,/
R-I
R-:
·
CZ 4iil
·
CZ4116
·
CZ4ll,
·
CZ 4iTe
App. HERRICK HANSON
Use 85 LOTS
Area 1tO. CALIE
Sec. I 'T. 7S.,R.3W. Assessor's
Circulotion SOLAlIA IY. SECONDARY 88'
[lement S. GENERAL KEARNY RD. ARTERIAL
Rd. Bk. PO. 55C Oete 8/19/85 Drown By Jcw
Is1. Sup. Dtst.
Bk. 921 I~. 38,/-59
I10'
RIV~'~ ¢10(4VTY PL tiAtNIN G 0 EPA R TMEN T
NO ~t~ E
R-2
LOCATIONAL MAP
Iio.
LOCATION
MAP
ITEM NO. 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
September 25, 1990
Parcel Map No. 23969
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Deborah Parks
Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Omdahl Enterprises
Markham and Associates
To subdivide 21.56 acres into four lots
Ridge Park Drive, South of Rancho California Road
North: )-P
South: M-SC
East: M-SC
West: I - P
Site: I-P
Site: Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Multi Family/Vacant
Single Family/Light Industrial
Vacant
STFRPT\PM23969. A 1
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
Parcel Map No. 23969 was continued from the August
20, 1990 Plannin9 Commission Hearing. The
Commission directed Staff to meet with the applicant
and William Haley, a neighborin9 property owner to
develop a solution regardin9 Pujol Street. The
meetin9 was held and the Staff Report has been
revised. A copy of the minutes of the August 20,
1990 hearin9 is attached.
The application for Parcel Map No. 23969 was
originally submitted to the Riverside County
Plannin9 Department on May 10, 1989. The parcel
map was reviewed by the Riverside County Land
Division Committee twice; on June 8, 1989 and
February 15, 1990. In April, 1990, the file was
transferred to the City of Temecula.
Area Setting
The project site is located in the Emerald Ridge
Business Park south of Rancho California Road on
Ridge Park Drive. The site is in a hillside area that
is currently bein9 mass graded as part of the
grading permit for Parcel Map No. 18254. Extensive
cut and fill was approved as part of the mass
grading plan resultin9 in very high 2: 1 slopes. The
properties to the north and west are vacant and are
also within the Emerald Ridge Business Park. South
of the project site, separated by a slope, is an
apartment buildin9. East of the project site, at the
base of a large slope are light industrial and
residential uses.
Circulation and Infrastructure
The mass grading permit for Parcel Map 18254 was
approved by the County of Riverside and did not
take into account the improvement of Pujol Street
along the easterly boundary of Parcel Map 23969. A
60 foot right-d-way for Pujol Street was not shown
on the underlying Parcel Map 18254, only the
existing 40 feet. Within the 20 foot area necessary
to widen Pujol Street to 60 feet, the site has been
graded to a 2:1 slope improved with a concrete
draina9e swell and force main. These improvements
are located within an Eastern Municipal Water
District easement and are being paid for by
Assessment District 159. Attached Exhibit A shows
the two large, above ground pipes used to meter the
sewage flow of the force main. The force main is an
integral component of the sewer system for all of the
development in Assessment District 159. The force
STF R PT\PM23969. A 2
main helps to direct the sewage to the treatment
plant south of Winchester Road. The )ocation of the
sewage meters is within the 20 foot area needed to
widen Pujol Street to local street standards of 60
feet. The location of the sewer system and above
ground improvements were approved by the County
of Riverside.
The City's Engineering Department is required by
Ordinance 460 to condition Parcel Map No. 23969
with the dedication and improvement of all abutting
roadways. On August 27, 1990, the City Planning
and Engineering Departments held a meeting, as
directed by P)anning Commission, to develop a
solution which would allow access to Mr. William
Haley's property on Pujol Street and take into
consideration the sewage meters within the 60 foot
right-of-ways. The applicant and Mr. Haley were
invited to the meeting. Mr. Haley did not attend
the meeting but was informed of the meeting's
results in a letter (see attached). In attendance at
the meeting were Douglas Stewart, Kirk Willjams,
John Middleton, Howard Omdahl and Deborah Parks.
A solution to the dedication and improvement of
Pujol Street was developed which does not require
an exception to Ordinance 460.
Riverside County Standard 106, Section "A" allows
for short local streets to have an ultimate right-of-
way of 50 feet with an improved area of 32 feet. By
only requiring an additional 10 foot dedication, the
sewage meters will be avoided. A cul-de-sac bulb
will not be required for this project.
John Middleton spoke with Laura Cabral of the
Riverside County Fire Department regarding the
proposed improvements of Pujol Street. She agreed
that the applicant could build Pujol Street according
to the 32'/50' standards with curb and gutter
adjacent to Parcel Map No. 23969 only. She also
agreed that a turn-around bulb at the end of the
cul-de-sac would not be necessary at this time since
the street only provides access to one dwelling unit.
The Engineering Department recommends that an
off-set cul-de-sac be constructed in the future
when Mr. William Haley's property is developed to
R-3 standards.
STFRPT\PM23969. A 3
GENERAL PLAN/
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Parcel Map Configuration
Parcel 22 of Parcel Map No. 18254 is the underlying
parcel for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 divides the site into
four parcels. The sizes of the parcels are as
fol lows:
Parcel 1 - 6.02 acres
Parcel 2 - 4.75 acres
Parcel 3 - 6.25 acres
Parcel 4 - 4.54 acres
The subject site is designated RL1 - Restricted
Light Industrial by the Southwest Area Plan· The
proposed division of land is consistent with the
policies for industrial use. It is anticipated that the
project, as conditioned, will be consistent with the
City's forthcoming General Plan·
An Initial Study has been completed for the project
and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the
proposal.
The proposed division is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan and Zoning Code in that
all four parcels exceed the minimum lot size of
20,000 square feet and the minimum averege
lot width of 100 feet·
The lot design is logical and meets the
approval of the City's Planning and
Engineering Departments.
The legal owner of record has offered to make
all dedications required.
The project will not have a significant
adverse affect on the environment· A
Negative Declaration is recommended and all
impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels
through recommended conditions of approval.
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the City's
General Plan once adopted, based on analysis
contained in the Staff Report.
STF R PT\PM23969. A 4
The division of land is consistent with the
provision of Title 18 of the Subdivision Map
Act.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Parcel Map No. 23969
2. APPROVE Parcel Map No. 23969
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions
of Approval.
DP:ks
STFR PT\PM23969. A
5
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Parcel Map No. 23969'
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Plannincl Department
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 23969, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460,
Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date
unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision
Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance 460.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers,
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary· All
offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Prior to any grading, a Gradin9 Plan in compliance with the Uniform Buildin9
Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Buildin9 and Safety.
STFRPT\PM23969. A I
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor's letter
dated April 2, 1990, a copy of which is attached. All items of the letter shall
comply except for No. 's 3 and 6.
10.
The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 22, 1989, a
copy of which is attached.
11.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated June 7, 1989, a
copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood
control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land
Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or
waiver of parcel map.
12.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 3, 1990, a copy
of which is attached.
13.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated March 8, 1990,
a copy of which is attached.
14.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated July 14, 1989, a
copy of which is attached.
15.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Li9htin9 Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
16.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern
Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 16, 1989, a copy of which is
attached.
17.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Southern California Edison Company transmittal dated May 24, 1989, a copy
of which is attached.
18,
Prior to recordation of this map, a reciprocal access agreement shall be
recorded for Parcels 2 and 3.
19.
Prior to recordation of this map, a signing and striping plan along with a
street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
2O.
Prior to occupancy, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements
and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, includin9 that for
traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the SIR/Negative
Declaration for the project, in the amount in affect at the time of payment of
STFRPT\PM23969. A 2
the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not
been finally established by the date on which developer requests its buildin9
permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been
provided to developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assumin9
benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its
right to protest such increase.
21.
Prior to occupancy, Pujol Street shall be improved with concrete curb and
9utter, (on the south side) located 16 feet from centerline with 32 feet of
asphalt concrete payin9 in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106,
Section "A" (32'/50).
22.
Dedication shall be made on Pujol Street to provide for a full 50 foot right-of-
way in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106, Section "A" (32'/50)
prior to final map.
23.
Prior to occupancy, a Riverside County Standard 810 barricade shall be
constructed at the west end of Pujo) Street.
The applicant shall not be required to construct a sidewalk on Pujol Street
adjacent to Parcel Map No. 23969.
GRADING:
25.
Prior to the issuance of 9radin9 permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by pay/n9 the fee required by that ordinance. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation
Plan as implemented by City Ordinance or resolution,
26.
Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as
presented in the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. All cut
and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet
in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special
terracing Ibenching) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retain walls,
and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not
exceed a 15% grade.
27.
Prior to the issuance of grading and/or building permits, all proposed new
structures on parcels shall be limited to slopes less than 26% unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Director.
28.
All grading and building plans/permits shall reflect the utilization of post and
beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post
and beam foundations when development is proposed on slopes of 15% or
greater measured over a horizontal distance of 30 feet. All driveways shall
not exceed a 15% average grade.
STFRPT\PM23969. A 3
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
29.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permi.ts from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department
of Building and Safety.
30.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the I-P zone.
31.
All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 20,000
square feet.
32.
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a
net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility
easement.
33.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of
Ordinance 460.
34.
Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a certificate
of noncontiguous ownership.
35.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in this subdivision in accordance with
the Standards No. 400 and 401, except that sidewalk shall not be required on
the south side of Pujol Street.
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
36.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following conditionis) shall be
complied with:
The subdivider shall annex Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 into the City
of Temecula's Recreation and Parks District.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with
the City of Temecula Recreation and Parks District which demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for
the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section
10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the
Board of Supervisors prior to the recordation of the final map.
A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet i ECS) shall be
transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
STFRPT\PM23969. A 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS:
37.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the City. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the
ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to
the Plannin9 Department and the Department of Buildin9 and Safety. The
following notel s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"Surface alteration shall not be allowed in the delineated constraint area
without additional archaeological investi9ation or mitigation as directed
by the City of Temecula Plannin9 Department.
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the
Observatory. Outdoor lightin9 shall be from low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject
property as of the date of recordation of the final map.
The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanyin9 Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.
No buildin9 permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any
building in Parcel Map No. 23969 until the developer or the developer's
successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of said agreement for the financing of public facilities.
STF R PT\PM23969. A
5
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY'OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 23969 TO SUBDIVIDE A 21.56 ACRE PARCEL
INTO 4 LOTS ON RIDGE PARK DRIVE, SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD.
WHEREAS, Omdahl Enterprises filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map application was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Parcel
Map on September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearin9, the Commission
recommended approval of said Tentative Parcel Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated City shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
I1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
{ 2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
FORMS\RES-TTM 1
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the
SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
12 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approvin9 projects
and takin9 other actions, includin9 the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
There is reasonable probability that
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 proposed will
be consistent with the general plan proposal
bein9 considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 6.5, no Tentative Parcel Map may be
approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any Tentative Parcel Map approved shall be subject to
such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative
Parcel Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
FORMS\RES-TTM 2
community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby 9ranted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 for the subdivision of a 21.56 acre parcel into four
14) lots located at Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California Road, subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the
Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
FORMS\RES-TTM 3
APPLI CANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read~ understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969.
DATED: By
Name
Title
FORMS\RES-TTM q
PLANNING COMMIBSION MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990
Commissioner Ford moved to close the public hearing
seconded by Commissioner Fahey and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Hoag]and moved to reject staff's
recommendation and not adopt the Nqgative Declaration
for Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 and deny Plot Plan Nos. 5
and 6, and direct staff to work with the applicant
to provide a detailed landscape plan, review the
structural design to ensure adequate screening
of the roof equipment, study the parking and to
re-evaluate the location of the truck loading
doors. Commissioner Hoagland amended his motion
by continuing ~he public hearing on Item 4 and Item 5
to the Planning Commission meeting of September 17,
1990. Commissioner Fabey seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Ch~niaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
ReCeSS
Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff declared a five minute recess at 7:50
P.M. to allow planning staff to set up more exhibits for agenda
items. The meeting was reconvened at 7:55 P.H.
Tentative Parcel Map 23969
6.]
Deborah Parks presented staff's report on the subdivision
of Parcel 22 of Parcel Map 18254 into four parcels.
Ms. Parks stated that when the parcel map was approved
by the County, they failed to show Pujol Street. County
Ordinance 460 required the dedication of Pujol Street;
at that time, however, is was overlooked and the width
of Pujol Street remained at 40 feet. When Ohmdahl
Enterprises applied to sub-divide, they were told by
the County they would need the dedication of 20 feet
of Parcel 2 for dedication of Pujo] Street. Ohmdahl
Enterprises had reached an agreement with Eastern
Municipal Water District to provide an easement within
this 20 feet. To widen Pujol Street would be a great
expense and at this time staff is unclear as to who
would be responsible for the cost of these improvements.
MIN.8/20/90
-6- e/2s/9o
PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST ~0, I. 990
John Middleton stated that the EnQineering DeDartment's
recommendation was to construct Pu~o] Street as per
county standards.
Anthony Polo, Markham & Associates, c41750 Winchester Road,
Temecu]a, gave a brief description of the project.
William Haley, 28426 Pujol Street, Temecula, an
adjacent property owner expressed his desire to have
the developer proceed with the road improvements to Pujol
Street as proposed by the County of Riverside.
Anthony Polo offered an alternative to the Commission
of leaving Pujo] Street in its' present state and
provide the dedication and improvements to create a
cu]-de-sac on the end of Sixth Street.
Doug Stewart, deputy traffic engineer, advised the
Commission that the easement was neither Mr. Ohmdah]'s
property nor Mr. Haley's property. He stated that
County Ordinance No.460 and the recommendation by the
Riverside County Transportation Department requires
certain improvements be completed; however, there is
an exception clause within the ordinance that would
allow the Commission to deviate from these required
street improvements, but only under that exception
clause could the Commission consider anything other
than what was recommended by the county.
Commissioner Fahey Questioned the reference to special
circumstances of the exception applicable to the
properties size, shape or topagraphy, and did that
exception apply to such conditions created by the
property owner.
Doug Stewart stated that the ordinance requires that
the applicant put in a street; however, it would be at
a substantial cost to the applicant, and since applicant
has offered other alternatives that seem more appropriate,
the commission could consider one of these alternatives
and make that recommendation to the City Council.
Commissioner Chiniaeff asked if staff needed action by
the Commission to come back with a partial recommendation.
MXN. S/20/90 -7- e/23/90
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 20, 1990
John Cavanaugh advised the Commission that if they were
to approve this parcel map and reconnnend there be a
partial dedication or recommend that part of the
dedication be accomplished by another property owner
other than the applicant, the Commission needs to be
aware that ]f the other property owner does not approve
of the recommendation, and if that approval is not
sought within 120 days after the Commission's
recommendation, this condition will automatically
terminate.
Commissioner Ford asked if this was a condition for
outside improvements, could the Cor~ission request the
applicant to bond or guarantee the acquisition rights
of the property.
John Cavanaugh stated that the Commission could either
recommend that the applicant provide the dedication of his
own property or recommend partial dedication/vacation of
the other property owner. If the other property owner
does not approve 120 days after the Commission acts on it,
tbis conddt~on is automatically terminated.
Commissioner Fahey moved to not adopt the Negative
Declaration for Parcel Map No. 23969, and to continue
the item to September 17, 1990, with staff working with
both parties to come to an agreement acceptable.
Commissioner Ford seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES:
0 COMMISSIONERS: None
7. Plot Plan 11621
7.1
Deborah Parks provided staff's report and an architectural
rendering of the project, a proposal to complete Phase 2
of the project.
WIN, 8/20/90 -8- 8/23/90
Lou-,¥~o~ o~-
nr_L,r..~vr_u Ruu- B !~J~U
August 6, 1990
Planning Commission
City of Temecula
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
Subject:
Case Number:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Tentative Parcel Map 23969
Omdahl Enterprises
Katl'deen Way
South of Rancho California Road
To subdivide Parcel 22 of Parcel Map 18254
into four parcels
Dear Sirs:
My property, 28426 Pujol Street, Temecula (Assessment Number and Parcel
922052010-9, .57 acres, Per. Lot 102, Block 38), is across Pujol Street from the
proposed subdivision. Late in 1989, I found the surface of the street destroyed
because, I assume, of the construction creating a plateau just west and above
this area.
I contacted the County Road Comn~ission to inquire aboxtt Pujol's future
repairs. I was informed that as a condition for the development of Tentative
Parcel Map #23969, the County was proposing to the Planning Commission
and the Board of Supervisors that this part of "Pujol should be improvt'd
with 40 feet of asphalt paving with concrete curb and guth'r within 60 feet
right of way terminating in an offset cui de sac.''.1 Later, April 2, 1990, a
re:'ision was n'~ade to the proposal and the only cha~ge of whicl'~ I am aware
is on page 2, number 5 stating "A slandard offset cul de sac shall be
constructed on Pujol Street witl~in the !and division" changing from
"culminating on an offset cuhtesac.''#2
The developer ,.,,,as aware of the County condition before he began his project
and he has continued to be aware of the situation since Temecula has become
a city. I have no concern one way or the other regarding the cul de sac, but I
feel that this section of Pujol Street needs to be improved, repaved again, and
the developer needs to provide the 20 feet dedicated right of way to conform
with the rest of Pujol Street.
Planning Co~nmission
Page 2 August 6, 1990
Thot~gh I understand that the City of Temecula now has the authority and
responsibility for these matters, 1 assume both lhe City and the County respect
each other's professionalism and would agree on previous commitments that
are obviously nonpartial and in widespread use.
Sincerely,
lkr
#I In tile City of Temccula, Fih' #PM23969, #1 Letter of 2/6/90 from County Road
Administrative Engineer to William ltalcy
#2 Re: PM 23969 - Amt'nding #1 Schedulc E - Team 5, SMD #9
AP 111-111-111-9
CC:
W. Abram, Supervisor
D. Dixon, City Manager
R. Stephenson, Road Administrative Engineer
J. Surlett, Weldan Associates
I. Tennant, Road/Transportation Commission
OMDAHL ENTERPRISES
28285 Rancho Calif. Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
CITY OF TEMECULA
Planning Commission
RE: P.M. 23969 Pujol Street
Commissoners;
~{e, Omdahl Enterprises, feel the condition requiring us to
grant a 20 ft. easement along the Pujol St. dead-end and
construct one half of the street with a offset cul-del-sac
is not reasonable or feasible. It qualifys under par. B
sec. 3.1 ARTICLE 111 (Standards of Land Division-General):
"Exceptions from the requirements of this ordinance
relating to the design or improvements of land divisions
shall be granted only when it is determined that there are
special circumstances ap~.licable to the property, such as
but not limited to size , shape or topographical conditions,
or existing road alignment and width, and that the granting
of the modification will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare or be damaging to other property
in the vicinity."
Reasons for requesting the exception:
Physically difficult and costly due to;
1)
the existing 2:1 slope in the proposed easement
requires a retaining wall to accomodate widening
the street and cul-de-sac.
2)
the existing drainage structure in the proposed
easement would have to be redesigned and rebuilt.
3)
the forced sewer main in the proposed easement
would have to be realigned and lowered.
4)
the blow-off valves on the forced sewer main in
the proposed easement would have to be relocated
and because of the lowering an extra blow-off
valve would have to located on the line.
The industrial zoned property, requesting the lot-
split, has been graded per an approved grading plan
and does not and will never access Pojul St.
This section of Pujol St. serves as access to one res-
idential lot which has an existing 40 ft. access road
which we are not hindering or altering in any way.
Construction of the street and cul-de-sac would result
in a 15 ft high retaining wall which would be dangerous
to children, a graffiti wall and an eye sore for the
adjacent residential property owners.
The existing 2:1 slope is within a landscape maintenance
area including irrigated trees, shurbs and flowers. This
beautiful backdrop will be maintained by the Crystal
Ridge Business Park.
In conclusion, we feel that this would be an impossible
condition to meet and would prevent us from moving forward
with the development of our park as planned. The estimated
exspense to move the existing facilities and build the proposed
road is in excess of $250,000.00 dollars. The time involved
to get such plans approved thru the various agencies may
exceed two years. The net benefit to the public is zero; the
net benefit to the one residential lot is to provide it with
a 60 ft. access road in leu of its present 40 ft. access.
Again we would like to point out that this situation calls
for an application of par. B sec. 3.1 article 111. We would
also like to point out sec. 66411.1 of the Subdivision
Map Act;
"(a) Whenever a local ordinance requires improvements
for a division of land which is not a subdivision of five or
more lots, the regulations shall be limited to the dedication
of right-of-way, easements, and the construction of reasonable
offsite and onsite improvements for the parcels being created"
Thank you for your time and consideration·
Sincere y,
Howard Omda~rl, General Partner
Omdahl Enterprises
MEMO TO FILE
Parcel Map No. 23969
August 24, 1990
3p.m.
Spoke with Laura Cabral with Riverside County Fire Department about
Pujol Street.
She agreed that the developer could build a 32/50 street with
curb/gutter only on Omdahl's property without a turn around at the
end of the street.
An offset cul-de-sac will be constructed sometime in the future by the
R-3 properties when they develop.
John Middleton ~,~~///
JM:ks
Kirk Willjams
Dou9 Stewart
Deborah Parks
Mayor
Ron Parks
"ayor Pro Tem
,rel F. Lindemans
September 5, 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, Califomia 92390
(714) 694-1989
FAX (714) 694-1999
Counciln~embers
Patdcia H. Birdsall
Peg Moore
I. Sal Mu~oz
Mr. William Haley
221 291h Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
SUBJECT: Pujol Street, Parcel Map No. 23969
Dear Mr. Haley,
I am sending you this letter to inform you of the decisions regarding Pujol Street
that were made at an August 27, 1990 meeting pertaining to parcel Map No. 23969.
The meeting was scheduled for a time which you had previously informed me that you
were available for. Both Doug Stewart and I expressed to you on August 24 the
importance of your attendance at the meeting. We are sorry that you were not able
to attend the meeting. In attendance at the meeting were Doug Stewart, Kirk
Willjams, John Middleton, Howard Omdahl, and myself.
The following recommended Conditions of Approval regarding Pujol Street resulted
from the meeting:
,
Prior to Occupancy, Pujol Street shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter, (on the south side) located 16 feet from centerline with 32 feet of
asphalt concrete paving in accordance with Riverside County Standard No.
106, Section A (32'/50).
The applicant shall not be required to construct a sidewalk on Pujol Street,
adjacent to Parcel Map No. 23969.
Applicant shall provide for dedication of an additional 10 feet (10') of right-
of-way adjacent to Pujol Street in order to provide for a full 50 foot right-of-
way in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 106, Section A (32'/50)
prior to final map.
Prior to occupancy, applicant shall construct a Riverside County Standard 810
barricade at the west end of Pujol Street.
PLANNING\L54
Mr. William Haley
September 5, 1990
Page 2
Construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to your property will not be a
Condition of Approval for Parcel Map No. 23969, but will be required upon future
development of your property.
All of these conditions of approval are based on Ordinance No. 460 and do not
require any exceptions.
We believe that your property will benefit from these recommended conditions of
approval and will not place a hardship upon you. They have been reviewed and
approved by the Riverside County Fire Department and will be presented to the City
of Temecula Planning Commission on September 17, 1990.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call myself or John Middleton at
( 714 ) 694-4600.
Sincerely,
Deborah Parks
Case Planner
Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
DP/GT:ks
CC:
Planning Commissioners
John Middleton
Doug Stewart
Tim D, Setlet
File
PLANNING\L54
~£AL MIOP[~TIES
AND
k~INIITIIAT~[ ItRVIC[S
Riverside County
P~ad Department
~.a. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
TILlPHONE:
1213) 4~1-2g27
May 24. 1989
Attn:
Subdivision Section:
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969
Please be advised that the division of the property shown on
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 will not unreasonably interfere
with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by
Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said
tentative parcel map.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the
Company's rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s),
nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the
provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for
teloration of any affected facilities.
In the event that the development requires teloration of facil-
ities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right
of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested
to bear the cost of such teloration and provide Edison with
suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights
are required prior to the performance of the teloration.
If additional information is required in connection.with the
above mentioned subject, please call me at (213) 491-2644.
Very truly yours.
REGIONAL MANAGER
RDeEal Properties Agent
18455pmh
CC:
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Markham & Associates
ATTN: Patti Nabill
~25/R/eg/S
Easter. M..i ip ,lWater
R.~lm, ine af~ Shetrill
R~r~ M. ~t
Board of Dtttctort
J.hn M CouduteL Ptesidem
Rkhtrd C Kelley. Vi~e Ptefidem
Wm G. Aldtldge
Chester C Gilbcr~
Rodget D. S~em,
$rcrtta~'/
)u,niu L Machek
Riverside Co. Planning Dept.
4080 Lemon St., 9th Floor
Riverside, Ca 92501
SUBJECT:
The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project
relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this
project review.
The subject project:
/Is not within EMWD's:
-----water service area
sewer service area
/Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to
be served by EMWD:
Sewer Service
Any and all necessary regionally sized onstte and offsite gravity sewers and
appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment,
and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD regulations
will be allowed.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Planntng Department
COUNTY OF R I VERS I DE
Department of Building and
PLANMINI
yards ·
permit
¢_Z~'__Please make the following a condition of approval:
~_a. Prior to commencing any grading exceeding 50 cubic
~ 8 E~ the owner of that property shall obtain a grading
w . from the Department of Building and Safety
Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit
and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from
the Building and Safety Department.
P~ior to issuance of any building permit, the property
owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to
construct from the Building and Safety Department.
Constructing a road, where greate~ than 50 cubic yards
material is placed or moved, requires a grading permit.
Prior to occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this
permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shall
be o~tained from the Building and Safety Department.
Provide verification that the existing grading
permitted and approval to construct was obtained from
Building and Safety.
the
___g. The Grading Section has no comment on this site.
NOTE:
For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable
information from County Grading Porms ES~-8b
EBb-el
ES -4a ( PAVING}
~B~-19~
E8~-13~
Ray. 3/8~
C~JNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Building and Safety
~ase refer to the following comments when submitting a grading
~,an for plan review by the Grading Section.
X
..~13 ·
14,
15.
16-
19.
Please refer to department forms 284-86, 284-120, 284-21
and 24-46 for applicable information to include on your
grading plans.
In orde'r to issue a grading permit, the following items
will be needed*at the plan review stage.
X a. Obtain a plan review permit.
X b. Provide 2 copies of the Preliminary Soils
Report.
Provide a copy of the hydrologic-hydraulic
Submit
review.
study.
Provide clearance
departments.
letters from the following
Planning
Flood Control
Road Department
Other F/~E
Provide a set of the Planning Department
conditions of approval on the approved case.
Provide an erosion control plan, prepared by
a licensed landscape architect, for plan
review, permit, and bonding.
5 copies of the grading plan for distribution and
Refer to any specific plan related to this project.
This property is located in the Rancho California
Potential Subsidence area. Per Board Resolution 88-61,
additional geotechnical information is required.
Observe slope setbacks from permit areas and structures
per section 7011 and figure 29-1 of the Uniform Building
Code as modified by Ordinance 457.
Driveway grades shall be 15% or less.
Show*street and pad elevations~ *.Insure that al% grade
(minQ can be*maintained from back of pad to street.
Design V-ditches at top of slopes to handle the Q-100
year storm flow.
Provide recorded drainage easements for the proposed lot
to lot drainage.
Show the Q-iO0 year storm flows at the inlet and outlet
of all drainage fabilities.
Provide building footprint on all lots.
Design each lot to drain separately.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, projects having
an imbalance between cut and fill shall specify the
location of their import or export source.
Show all slopes to scale, including terrace and setbacks.
Proposed off-site grading will require written notarized
permission from the affected property owner.
No obstruction or diversion of natural water courses
shall be permitted.
Provide sufficient offsite topography to show this
projects compatibility with adjacent properties.
Verify any underlying grading was permitted and approved
to construct there on.
Adrninimralive Cenler · '1777 Atlanla Avenue
Fliver$ide, CA 9'2507
March 8, 1990
MAR l 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Jeff Adams
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
R!~ ~RSIDE COUNTY
PL/~,NNtNG DEPARTMENT
RE: Parcel Map 23969, Amended Map No. 1
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
Sincerely,
Vaughn Sarkisian
Land Use Technician
/sn
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
April 2, 1990
[~n E ~ntmnt
ACTING ROAD ~MM~iONER & ~UNTY SURVEYOR
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
MAILING ADDRESS:
PAD. BOX 1090
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
(714) 27~4s88~
PM 23969 - Amend #1
Schedule E - Team 5 SMD #9
AP #111-111-111-9
With respect to the conditions of approval for the
referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department
recommends that the landdivider provide the following street
improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road
Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the
tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations,
all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may
require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration.
These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts
and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though
occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement.
All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall
be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i.e., concentration of diversion of flow· Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills ere allowed"· The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all
offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the
event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for
drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed
the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for
drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate
drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department.
~_969 - Amend #1
'April 2, 1990
Page 2
11.
PuJol Street shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter located 20 feet from centerline and match up asphalt
concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing
paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 60
foot full width dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard No. 104, Section A. or as .approved by the
Road Department.
Kathleen Way shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 111.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Con~issioner. Completion of road
improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by
County. ' ....
A standard offset cul-de-sac shall be constructed on PuJol
Street within the landdivision.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The applicant shall provide CC&R's to insure access to all
parcels.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of
Ordinance 461·
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and
401 (curb sidewalks) as approved by the Road Conxnissioner.
Prior to the recordation of the "fihal map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a
cash sum of $1,750.00 per gross acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to
defer the time of payment, a written agreement may he
entered into with the County deferring said payment to the
time of issuance of a building permit.
Electrical and co~nunications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817·
/~M 2~969 - Amend
April 2, 1990
Page 3
3.
4.
5.
6e
7.
18.
9.
Lot access shall be restricted on PuJol Street and so noted
on the final map.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control and sight distance
control as approve] by the Road Department.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 18254.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The
County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether
this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment
district or not. If not, the land owner shall file, *fter
receiv{ng tentative ~prov~l, for an application with LAFCO
for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment
District' in accordance with Governmental Code Section
56000. PRIOR TO P~-CORDATION, the landowner shall receive
and provide a Certificate of Completion from LAFCO.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Co~nissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format ( 24 ' x 36 "). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict only
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
The applicant shell record CC&R's to provide access to
Parcels 2 and 3. Said CC&R's shall be subject to approval
by County Counsel and the Road Comissioner.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any
subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment
District must comply with the requirements of said Section.
Road Division Engineer
naT: Jw
DM:
uo lncy oI l clverslOe
DEPARTMENT OF tlEAL]It
RIVERSI E COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
~Mart~ental Health Specialist IV
PARCEL M_h2 23969 - S~2q 53 Requirements
DATE: May 22, 1989
j IEII:glE IE '
23
The Environmental !lealth Services Division has reviewed tile tentative
map for this project and cannot make nny recommendations until a
sanitation letter is filed. TIle requirements for a SAN S3 letter are
as follows:
A satisfactory soils percolntion test to prove the
project feasible.
A clearance letter from tl~e n!,prol}rinte California
Regional Water Control Board·
3. Two copies of tl~e tentative m."'tlt.
A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies
serving parable water.
Should the project be served saultar)' sewer service, this Department
would need only:
A "wi I 1-serve" letter from the n~ency/agencies serving
parable water a,d sanitary sewers.
2, One copy of tile tentative map.
If the project is to be served Icater ID' existing wells, pumps and
water tanks, a water stropply permit will be required (contact the
Environmental !lealth Services Ilivisio,, !in~ineering Sectlea at
787-6544). The requirements for a water s,pply permit are as follows:
Satisfactory lalmrator)' tests (bacteriological, orp. anic,
inorganic, gener:tl I~l~)'sic:~!, nnd p. enernl mineral) to
prove tile wztter Imtal}le. '.
A complete set of plnns sinewlap. all details of the
!~roposed nnd existlug water systems: sizes and types
of pipe nnd calctilntio,s sltowi,g that adequate quantity
nnd pressure Can be nm intn i.ed (Ca I i rornja Waterworks
Stnml:lrds - Cul i foruia Ilcal th nml Safety Code nnd
California Administrutive Code, Title 22). These plans
must be signed by a registered civil engineer.
KENNETH I_ rDWANDE
CHIEF ENGINEIN
~llgB MANKILT ITRIIrT
P. O. BOX TO33
TELEPHONE (714) 787-2OI5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California 92501
Attention:
Regional Team No. 5
Patti Nahill
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Parcel Map 23969
This is a proposal to divide 21.56 acres into 4 lots in the
Temecula area. The site is located at the end of Kathleen Way
south of Rancho California Road.
Parcels 3 and 4 are proposed to drain to the storm drain located
northeast of this site. Parcels 1 and 2 are proposed to drain
east of the site. Offsite flows are to be collected in the con-
crete ditch in the southern most corner of the site. These pro-
posals appear to be consistent with the approved Parcel Map
19626-2.
Following are the District's recommendations:
This parcel map is located within the limits of the Mur-
rieta Creek/Murrieta Valley Area Drainage Plan for which
drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage
fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of
the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area
Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner
as part of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map; or
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting ale ferment of the payment
of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map: provided
however, this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
have been initiated on the ~arcel within the prior 3
year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 2969
- 2 -
June 7, 1989
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith
of this office at 714/787-1253.
c: Markham and Associates
Senior Civil Engineer
ZS:seb
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ,~'
P 1 anner
Area:
Re:
1995 MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015
FAX NO. (714) 788-9965
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
/This project is a part of /:~/C~//~/~y~-,~ The project will be
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~ave been constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
V ryFruly you s
~O~JriH. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: A~,-IO~ [~)i 0
PhnainS & EnSinee~g Offia
46-209 Oasis Strict, .Suite 405
indio, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
TO:
ATTN:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JEFF ADAMS
' ' Planning & EnSineering C)ffia
/,4080 lemon St~t, Suite 11L
Riverside, CA 92501
!ff R 0 8 7990cv141 vs -66o6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
R VE S OE CO
PLANNING DEpA UNTy
RTU NT
PARCEL MAP 23969 - AMENDED #1
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 5000 GPM
and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPM for
hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2-2½") shall be located at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with
no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet'from a fire hydrant.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Mantwell, Fire Safety Specialist
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1. l~mse of Proponent:
2. Address and Phone
~--her of Proponent:
Omdahl EnterDrises
28275 Rancho California Road
Temecula, California 92390
e
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Location of Proposal:
June 22, 1990
CITY OF TEMECUIA
Tentative Parcel Map # 23969
South of Kathleen Way
II
Environmental Impacts
I Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
Ce
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
de
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
X
BLANKIES/FORMS
fe
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands. or changes in
siltation. deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay. inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes. landslides. mudslid,s.
ground failure. or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement.
moisture. or temperature. or any
change in climate. whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents. or
the course or direction of water
movements. in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates. drainage patterns. or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality. including. but not limited
to. temperature. dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters~
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ~including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants ) ?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes
X
Maybe
No
X
X
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise· Will the proposal result in:
a.- Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
ae
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset· Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances {including,
but not limited to, oil. pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Wil| the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes
Maybe
X
No
X
X
X
BLANKIF~/FC)RM-~
Yes Maybe No
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
ee
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
16.
ae
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities· Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems. or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
X
X
X
X
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
ae
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe
X
NO
.X..--
×
X
×
RI ANKII:C, II:t~DUC
Yes Maybe N,_~o
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species. cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? I A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? I A project~s
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
BLANKIES/FORMS 'R'
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ticant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
31 Ll,ly 1990
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
:IiVE:t iDE COUn u.
-PLanninG DEPA:tDnEn
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' (E.A.) NUMBER:
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s): ';P/~C.,F'#_
APPLICANT'S NAME: OH/~tCk-I'~L-
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: ~ ~1
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. DESCRIPTION (include pro~ minimum lot size and uses as appli~ble):
STANDARD EVALUATION
MODULE NUMBER(s):
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ,~..{, r_---~ ; or SQUARE FEET
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): C}HO ' '~JlO 'OIc~ ,i~iV.D cl~tO- ~10-0~--.,0
D. EXISTING ZONING:
E. PROPOSED Z,ONING:
F. STREET REFERENCES:
Ge
He
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
OF WA,.f
SECTION,.TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS:
II. COMPREHENSNE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check the appropriate option(s) below and proceed accordingly.
[] All or pad of the project site is in "Adopted Specific Plans," 'REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community
POlicy Areas". Complete Sections III, IV (B and C only), V and VI.
:~ All or part of the project site is In "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV
(A, B and D only), V and VI.
[] All or part of the project site has an Open Space and Conservation designation other than those mentioned
I III. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
A. Indicate the nature of the proposed land use as determined from the descriptions as found in Comprehensive General Plan Figure
VI.3 (Circle One). This information is necessary to determine the appropriate land use suitability ratings in Section III.B.
NA - Not Applicable Critical Elumntial Normal-High Risk (~NormaI-Low ~
B, Indicate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any environmental hazard and/or resource lesues may significantly affect or be affected
by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y) write
additional data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact and any mitigation measures under Section V. Also, where indicated,
circle the appropriate land use suitability or noise acceptability rating(s). (See definitions at bottom of this page).
HAZARDS
I t,( Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault 12. Id
Hazard Zones (Fig. VI.1 )
NA PS U R (Fig. V1,,3)
Liquefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VI. 1 ) D ~ ~ C., ~. 13. H
NA S 4~ U R (Fig. VI.4)
GroundshakingZone(FigVl.1) CLA-_-j~ 'FF 14. kJ
lo.N
11.,k.I
Airport Noise (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11
& V1.12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
4~ A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
Railroad Noise (Fig. VI.13 - VI.16)
d~ A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
Highway Noise (Fig. VI. 17 - VI.29)
NA
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps)
Landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale
Seismic Maps or On-site Inspection)
S PS U R
Reckfall Hazard (On-site Inspection)
Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service SoIl Surveys)
Erosion (U.S,D-~. Soil Conservation
Service Soil Surveys)
Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (Fig. VI.1,
Ord. 460, Sac. 14.2 & Ord. 484)
Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7)
Roodplains (Fig, VL7)
~ PS U R (Fig. VI.5) ~) A B
(Fig. VI.6)
(Fig. VI.8)
15. Other Noise
16.
17. k}
18. ~%)
19. ~
20. H
21. ~
22. JJ
23. ~J
24. _.~
25. ..
C D (Fig, Vl.11 )
NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
Project Generated Noise Affecting
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI.11)
Noise Sensitive Project (Fig. VI.11)
Air Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Air Quality
Water Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Water Quality
Hazardous Materials and Wastes
Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31)
Other ~Ji, L~'~tDr ldr--F'- ~
Other
RESOURCES
26. kJ Agriculture (Fig. Vl.34- VI.35) 32j~/
27,/~ In or Near an Agdculturel Preserve 33. tJ
(Riv. Co. Agricultural Land Conversation 34._.~_.
Contract Maps)
Vegetation (Fig. VI.38 - VI.40)
33~1..~ Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI.42) 36.
Energy Resources (Fig. VI.43 - VI.44) 37.
Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.45)
Histodc Resources (Fig. VI.32 - VI.33)
Archaeological Resources :Pc> ~n 5
(Fig. VI.32 - VI.33 & VI,46 - VI.48)
Paleontological Resources
(Paleontological Resources Map)
Other
Other
Definitions for Land Use Suitability end Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable
U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted A - Generally Acceptable
LAND USE DETERMINATION
Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP" or "Rancho
Villages Community POlicy Areas."
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s):
3. SUBAREA, IF ANY: I~,¢VdC,H3 C_.J~LI J~)F;a~l~J) A
4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY: }~tT~. T~,c~I_D/vIA~
6. ATI I
7. SUMMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL:
For all projects, inidcate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may signir~.,antly affect
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any issue
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V.
PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1. Circulation (Fig. IV.1 -IV.11. Discuss in 10./~
Sec. V Existing, Planned & Required Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. IV. 12 - N. 13)
Water (Agency Letters)
Seer (Agency Lmtem)
Fire Services (Fig. N.16 - IV.18)
Sheriff Services (Fig IV. 17 - N. 18)
Schools (Fig. N.17 - N. 18)
Solid Waste (F~g. N.17 - N. 18)
Parks and Recreation (Fig. IV.19 - IV.20)
3.
4.
5~___
6.~j
7
9.~
11-/~
12. N
13. ~J
14
16. FJ
17-
Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV.19 - N.24/
Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Ma,os)
Utilities (Fig. N25 - IV.26)
Libraries (Fig. N.17 - N. 18)
Healffi Services (Fig. IV.17 - IV. 18)
Airports (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4,
11.18.8 - 11.18.10 & IV.27 - IV.36)
Dieaster Preparedness
City Sphere of Influence
Otter
If all or part of the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", 'REMAP" or 'Rancho Villages Community POlicy
Areas", review in detail the specific policies applying to the proposal, and complete the following:
1. Slate the relevant land use designation(s):
2. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistant with the policies and designations of the appropriate document,
and therefore consistent with the Comprehensive General PlanY If not, explain:
IV. LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued)
- D. ff all or pad of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", and is not in a Community Plan, complete
questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Plan.
1. Land use category(lea) necessan/to support the proposed projed. Also indicate land use type
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) C,P,T'F('nOP%Lf ~
Current land use category(los) for the site based on existing conditions. Also indicate land
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) Cr~.~ ~
3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be resolved at the development stage? Explain:
use type
4. Community Plan designation(s):
Is the proposed project consistent with the policies and designations of the Community Plan?
ff not, explain:
6. Is the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses?
If not, explain:
7. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the Compre|msive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
E.
If all or part of the project site is in an Open Space and Conservation designation, complete the following:
1. State the designation(s):
2. Is the proposal consistent with the designation(s)? If not, explain:
3. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consisent with fie Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT,AND MITIGATION MEASURES
A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE
SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION
ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED
DATE ADEQUACY
INFORMATION DETERMINATION
RECEIVED (YES/NO,DATE)
For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and IV.B, identify the Section and issue number and do the
following, in the format as shown below:
1. List all additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted.
2. State all findings of fact regarding environmental concerns.
3. State specific mitigation measures, if identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.)
4. If additional information is required before the environmental assessment can be completed, refer to
Subsection A.
5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check the I~:~x at the end of the section and attach
the necessary sheets.
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
See attached pages.
Vl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
[] The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration may be
(or)
[] The project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, them will not be a significant
effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in Section V have been applied to the
project and a Negative Declaration may be prepared.
(or)
[] The project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report
is required.
Name: hate:
Prepared by
ITEM NO. 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Plannin9 Department
September 25, 1990
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980,
Revised Permit No. 1,
PREPARED BY: Richard Ayala
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Linkletter RC Partners
The Keith Companies
Addition of second story
warehouse complex.
Terminus of Lyndie Lane
C-1/C-P
to Building "B" of mini-
I General Commercial )
North: R-2
South: C-1/C-P
East: C - 1 / C-P
West: C - 1 / C- P
Not applicable.
Existing Mini-Warehouse
{Multiple Family Dwellings)
I General Commercial )
I General Commercial )
I General Commercial )
STAFF R PT\ C U P2980 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Commercial
Multi-Family Dwellings and
Office Center under construction
Multi-Family Dwellings
No. of Acres:
Building Data:
Gross Storage Area:
Dwellin9 Unit Area:
Parking Required:
Parkin9 Provided:
3.08
Existing Building A: 12,921 sq.ft.
Proposed Building B: 33,070 sq.ft.
Existin9 Buildin9 C: 10,856 sq.ft.
Existin9 Buildin9 D: 6,194 sq.ft.
Existin9 Buildin9 E: 2,506 sq.ft.
Existin9 Buildin9 F: 2,000 sq.ft.
67,542 sq. ft.
1,385 sq. ft.
2 spaces/3 employees
7
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1,
Planning Correction No. 1 was originally approved by
the Riverside County Planning Commission on June 6,
1990. At that time a Negative Declaration was adopted
for Environmental Assessment No. 34398, and the
project was found to be consistent with applicable
policies in the County's comprehensive General Plan
and Zonin9 requirements.
The project is located at the terminus of Lyndie Lane.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1,
Planning Correction No. 1, is an application to add a
second story (approximately 16,535 sq.ft. ) to Building
"B" of an existing mini-warehouse complex. The
original mini-warehouse complex was approved under
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980 by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on May 25, 1989.
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed project has been designed in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460. The
main access to the project is Lyndie Lane. The mini-
warehouse complex has adequate vehicular circulation
and is enclosed within decorative concrete block walls.
Adequate landscaping is provided along the perimeter
of the complex and at the main entrance.
STAFFRPT\CUP2980 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
The proposed project is consistent with SWAP. Under
SWAP, the project site is designated commercial. In
addition, Staff finds it probable that this project will
be consistent with the new General Plan when it is
adopted.
The Initial Study conducted for Environmental
Assessment No. 34398 indicated possible negative
impacts and hazards associated with the project to be;
potential for erosion, aesthetics, and impacts to public
services and traffic. However, all of these concerns
can be adequately mitigated to the level of
insignificance through the Conditions of Approval at
development stage.
The site for the proposed use is suitable in size
to accommodate the proposed project.
2. The proposed intensity of use will not have a
substantial adverse impact on adjacent
properties.
3. The project as conditioned will not have an
adverse impact on traffic circulation.
The proposed use will not likely generate
excessive noise, vibration, or other disturbance
resulting from use of the site.
The project is considered consistent with the
current zoning of the subject site.
The project will not have a significant adverse
affect on the environment·
There is a reasonable probability that the project
will be consistent with the City's General Plan
Development Standards once adopted, based on
analysis contained in the staff report.
There is not a probability of detriment to, or
interference with the future General Plan if the
proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the
new General Plan.
The site of the proposed use is provided
adequate access.
STAFFRPT\CUP2980 3
10.
That findings stated above are supported by
minutes, maps, exhibits, correspondence and
environmental documents associated with this
project and herein incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
City Council:
RECEIVE AND FILE Conditional Use Permit No.
2980, Revised Permit No. 1, Planning Correction
No. I subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval, based on the analysis and findings
contained in this Staff Report.
RA:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
STAFFRPT\CUP2980
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Cbuncil/City Manager
Engineering Department
September 18, 1990
Additional Conditions of Approval for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980
Revised Permit No. 1
Staff is recommending that the Conditions of Approval previously approved by the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors be amended as indicated.
ADD THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
Prior to Occupancy:
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at
the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its
building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of
fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of
such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase.
JM:ks
STAFFRPT\CUP2980
LOCATIONAL MAP
15
NO SCALE
SUBJMCT: CCIqDITICRAL USE PERMIT NO. 2980,
PIANNING CORRECTION NO. 1
June 7, 1990
REVIS[~ PERMIT NO. 1,
I~9"RTVE ~ FTTR the Notice of Decision for the cases acted
on by the Planning Cu,,~ission on June 6, 1990.
THE PLANNING CCE44ISSION
/%Lf/',~a, the Negative Declaration for E.A. Number 34398 based
on the findings incorporated in the environmental assessment
and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a
significant effect on the enviromnent; and,
APPR(PVHD the C[~iTIfMAL U~E C~SE NO. 2980, ~ F~MIT
NO. 1, ~ ~1'1~ ~. 1 s~j~ to ~e atta~
~n~tions ~co~t~ ~ ~e Pl~g ~,~ssion ~utes
~t~ J~e 6, 1990.
The decision of the Planning Cut,tassion is considered final
and no action by the Board of Supervisors is required,
unless, within 10 days after the Notice of Decision aFpears
on the Board' s agenda, the applicant or an interested person
files an appeal acccmpanied by the fee set forth in ordinance
348, unless the Board orders the matter set for public
h~ring before the appropriate appeal board.
Pan Goldman, Chief Deputy Planning Director
PTev. ASh. tel'.
Depts. Comments Dist.
AGENDA NO.
MO[IUN: Upon mntion by Commissioner Donahoe, seconded by Commissioner Turner,
and unanimously carried, ~entativ~ TraCt No. 23278, Amended No. 6, was
continued to July 18, 1990 at 10:00 a.m.
(AGENDA ITEM 5-1 - Tapes 4B, 5A)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO. I - ~A 34398 - Linkletter Partners -
Temecula Area - First Supervisorial District - 2.12± acres, at terminus of
Lyndie Lane - PROjECT: Additional level on Building "B" of CUP 2980
{Mini-warehouse}
Hearing was opened at 5:25 p.m. and was closed at 5:36 a.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34398 and
approval of Conditional Use Permit 2989, Revised Permit No. 1, based on the
findings and conclusions listed in the staff report. The applicant proposes to
add a level on Building "B" on 2.12 acres located at the terminus of Lyndie
Lane. A mini-warehouse currently exists on the site. Surrounding land uses
are residential, a shopping center, an office complex, an apartment complex and
vacant property. Zoning on site is C-1/C-P. Surrounding zoning is C-l/C-P,
R-3 and R-2. The project has been determined to be compatible with area
development. The initial studies for this site indicated possible impacts by
way of erosion, aesthetics and public services and traffic. They are
attempting to compromise with the applicant and get some landscaping along the
northerly boundary to help mitigate potential visual impacts to the apartments
located to the west.
Commissioner Beadling asked would material be brought to the second floor of a
warehouse. Staff advised that they would use steps or elevate~s.
TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT:
jim Morrissey (Keith Companies, 6296 River Crest Drive, Riverside),
representing the applicant, said that the project is built and all that is left
to do is to add a second story to Building "B". The exhibit identified the
change that staff was requesting as part of the additional floor. There was
concern that the apartments located to the northwest would be concerned because
they would be looking at a two story building. The apartments are located on a
significant bluff, above the property, and will be able to see the site,
whether the building is one or two story. The project has allowed for that
planter area and there are eucalyptus trees already planted.
Mr. Morrissey distributed a letter to the'Commission from Linkletter
Construction (Creston Smith} with respect to vines being required along the
walls. He said that Condition 13 required that vines be placed every few feet
and that Condition 29 required that some type of material, a protective
coating, be placed on the exterior walls. 'He felt that that those two
requirements were in conflict. The reason for the vines was due to the
potential for graffiti, and the coating was for the easy removal of graffiti.
There is material which the applicant has used which will eliminate the
graffiti problem. The applicant asked, therefore, that all but the first
sentence be deleted from Condition 13. He noted that a number of the
conditions have already been complied with, and that a number of leases have
already occurred.
Con~issioner Turner said that he would agree that there was "double duty" with
the two requirements, but preferred the vines to the anti-graffiti coating.
Staff advised that the condition was added because there is already existing
graffiti on the walls. Adding vines would prevent the owner from having to
continually deal with maintaining the walls. Mr. Morrissey said that the
intent of the applicant having a manager on site was to protect the graffiti
from occurring. If it has occurred already, then that is unfortunate, but it
is something that an onsite manager can take care of, along with the coating.
The vines do not prohibit the graffiti but may lessen the amount of area
available for graffiti.
Commissioner Beadling asked if the vines could stick to coated walls. Staff
advised that vines are attaching vines and they can grow on glass.
Mr. Morrissey questioned Condition 30, which has the permit becoming null and
void in 2005. The applicant asked what will happen at that time, and staff
advised that the applicant would have to apply for a permit renewal through the
city. Mr. Morrissey asked if the County's conditions held with the city now
that the city is incorporated. Ms. Lind advised that this body is meeting as
the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula. Commissioner Turner said
that he would be amenable to extending that condition to 2015. Staff advised
that Condition 29 should be left as is, as it will take time for vines to grow.
Commissioner Turner agreed. No one else wished to comment.
The hearing was closed at 5:36 p.m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, I~eVised Permit No.
1, Planning Correction No. 1, is an application to add a second story to
Building "B" of a previously approved miniSwarehouse; the site currently
supports an existing mini-warehouse; the site is zoned C-l/C-P; surrounding
zoning includes C-l/C-P, R-2 and R-3; the site is located within SWAP; the land
use designation is residential (16 DU/acre}; environmental concerns include
potential erosion, aesthetics, impacts to public services and traffic; there is
a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time;
there is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted General Plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent
with the General Plan; and, the project complied with all other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinances. The proposal is compatible
with area development; is consistent with the C-1/C-P zone; and, will not have
a significant effect on the environment.
e4C)TION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Con~issioner Wolf, and
unanimously carried, the Commission adopted the Negative Declaration for EA
34398 and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised No. 1, Planning
Correction No. 1, subject to the conditions of approval as amended this date
and based on the above listed findings and conclusions.
Zoning Area: Temecula
Supervisorial District:
E.A. Number: 34398
Regional Team No.: 5
One
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No. 2980, Revised
Permit ~1, Planning Correction tl
Planning Commission: 6-6-90
Agenda Item No.: 5-1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Locati on:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
9. Co.nprehensive General Plan:
11. Agency Recommendations:
12. Letters:
Linkletter
Keith Companies
Addition of second story to Building "B" of
mini-warehouse complex
Terminus of Lyndie Lane
C-1/C-P
C-l/C-P, R-3, R-2
Existing mini-warehouse
Residential, shopping center, office
complex, apartment complex, vacant
SWAP
Land Use: Residential
Density: 8-16 DU/Acre
Open Space/Cons:
See Letters Dated:
Transportati on:
Health:
Flood:
Fire:
Area Not Designated
11-15-89
11-3-89
11-14-89
11-3-89
Building & Safety - Grading:
Building & Safety - Land Use
Opposing/Supporting:
11-16-89
12-7-89
None Received
ANALYSIS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1, Planning Correction rio.
1 is an application to add a second story to Building "B" of a mini-warehouse
complex. The original mini-warehouse complex was approved under CUP 2980.
The project is located at the terminus of Lyndie Lane in the City of Temecula.
LARD USE AND ZONING
The current land use on the site is a mini-warehouse, with a proposed office
and apartment complex directly to the east. To the north and west is a vacant
parcel and Just beyond is an apartment complex situated on a hill overlooking
the project. To the south is a shopping center.
Zoning on the site is C-1/C-P with R-2 to the north and west, R-3 to the east
and C-1/C-P to the south.
CONDITIONAL USE PEPMIT No. 2980, Rev. Permit #1
Planntng Correction #1
Staff Report
Page 2
GENERAL PLAN
The project is located within the Southwest Community Area Plan. The land use
designation is residential at 8-16 dwelling units per acre. However, the site
is occupied by an existing mini-warehouse. The project site was approved with
Change of Zone No. 5176 prior to adoption of SWAP. Adjacent to the project are
commercial uses to the south and proposed Offices to the east. Therefore, the
project is determined to be compatible with area development.
ENVIRONHENTAL ASSESSMENT
The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 34398 indicated
possible negative impacts and hazards associated with the project to be;
potential for erosion, aesthetics, and impacts to public services and traffic.
However, all of these concerns can be adequately mitigated to a level of
insignificance through the conditions of approval at development stage.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1, Planning Correction
No. 1 is an application to add a second story to Building "B" of a
previously approved mini-warehouse.
2. The site currently supports an existing mini-warehouse.
3. The site is zoned C-1/C-P. Surrounding zoning includes C-l/C-P, R-2 and
R-3.
41
The site is located within SWAP. The land use designation is residential
16-DU/Acre.
5. Environmental concerns include potential erosion, aesthetics, impacts to
public services and traffic.
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the General Plan proposal being studied or which will be studied within a
reas onabl e time.
7. There ts little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted ral plan if the project is
B. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances.
CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT No. 2980, Rev. Permitll
Planning Correction ~1
Staff Report
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal is ccrnpatible with area development.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the C-1/C-P zone.
3. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
RECOe~ENDATIONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34398
based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment; and
APPROVAL of CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1, Planning
Correction No. 1 based on the findings and conclusions found within the staff
report and subject to the attached conditions of approval.
JHR:jg
5/24/90
I Cu 2980 I LAND USE
APTS APT; 44,~RG~ .
.GRADED PTS ~./'APTS /
APTS sc~oo~
VA
d VAC VAC
~ HILLS
" ' TS
. . ,': :~:.. :. ;~ ~ :~ ',
" ~, ~ ' '~ ',VAC ' '~ "
~ J GRAD
· ~4!0..~NG MALIm
"' ~At ~ APTS
ee
o ·
~PTS
~. ~E KEITH'COMPANIES ' LOCATIONAL MA~ t
~ U~ ~NI-STORAGE
~ R~CHO ~IF~NIA Sup.Dist.l~T ~.,
'~. I T. BS,~3W ~or's Bk. 921 ~. 31
~culatbn YNEZ RD.--SP ROAD-- VAR.
~t RANCHO GALI~NIA RD. --ART.-- 110'
1C'L./'2980
RIm
RIIII
C-1/C-P
I
I/'
RIll
I EXISTING ZONING 13
R-2-Cj, O00
C-1/C-P
A-2-20
~ -
RIII~3
~ , eee
.-
App. THE KEITH COMPANIES
Use MINI-STOrAGE
Area RANCHO CALIFORNIA SuD.Dist. IST
Sec. I T.8$.R. 3W A~ssor.'$ Bk. 921 Pg. 31
Circultion YNEZ RD. --SP ROAD-- VAR.
~t RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. --ART.-- 110'
1'- 400' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNJNG O~'PARTMENT
I CP - SWAP
~ ' AC M~tN
""h 1/2 -
o.
tl
pt
'\
COMMUNITY .
_~p lm~O
App. THE KEITH COMPANIES
,
~ Use MINI-STORAGE
, 'Area RANCHO CALIFORNIA Sup.Dist.lST
Sec. I T. 8S.R. 3W Assessor's Bk. 921 Pg. 31
Circulation YNEZ RD. --SP ROAD-- VAR.
Element RANCHO CALIF-ORNIA RD. --ART.-- 110'
_ RcL Bk. Pg. 56ADate 5/16/90 Drawn By
1'- 2000' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4,,OO ATIO NAI, MAP
¢
( .. c {
I , {
., {
eel ,-_<,_
I
;I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PEANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Linkletter Properties
765 Baker Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2980
Revised Permit No. 1, Planning
Correcti on No. 1
Project Description: Addition of second
story to Building "B" of mini-warehouse
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-310-008
District/Area: Temecula
The use hereby permitted is for a mini-warehouse located within Assessor's
Parcel Number 921-310-008.
2. The pe~nittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concerning CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT :~980, REVISED PERMIT NO.l, PLANNING
CORRECTION NO. 1. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2} years of approval date;
otherwise, it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this ap roval within the two (2} year period which is thereafter
dil igent~y pursued to completi on, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, Planning Correction 1, or as amended
by these conall ti ons.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one
(1} year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall c~nply with street improvement requirements outlined
in the County Transportation Department 's letter dated 11-15-89, a copy of
which is attached.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
transmittal dated 11-3-89, a copy of which is attached.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2~980, Revised Permit No. 1
Planning Correction No. 1
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
11.
12.
13.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District's transmittal dated 11-14-89, a copy of which is
attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal
dated 11-3-89, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated
12-7-89, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall conply with the reconmendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal dated
11-16-89, a copy of which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. The landscaping shall include installation of
attaching vines to the exterior of walls and buildings. The vines shall
be planted not more than ten {10} feet on center to prevent the
application of graffiti. An automatic sprinkler system sJmall be installed
and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition.
Planting within ten (10} feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be
permitted to grow higher than thirty (30} inches.
Prior to the final occupancy permit of Building "B", the applicant shall
submit to the Planning Department a substantial conformance letter from
the project's Licensed Landscape Architect stating that the project was
constructed per the approved Landscape Plan Package. Upon Planning and
Building Depar)ent site reviews and approvals, all Landscape Bonds shall
be released.
A minimum of Seven (7) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Seven {7} parking
spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A, Planning
Correction No. 1. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic
concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II
base.
A minimum of one(l) handicapped parking s aces shall be provided as shown
on Exhibit A, Planning Correction No. 1. ~ach parking space reserved for
the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized
sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, Revised Permit No. 1
Planning Correction No, 1
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be
centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of
80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches fr~n the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous lace, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility,
not less t~an 17 inches by 22 clearly and conspicuously states the
following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
.................. or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking Vlace
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbo of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits frcrn the following agencies:
Transportation Department
Fire Depar~ent
Riverside County Flood Control
Written evidence of ccrnpllance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
If signage is desired, a separate plot plan shall be submitted for the
Planning Department's review and approval.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit B.
Floorplans shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view.
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Screening
Two trash enclosures which are adequate to enclose a total of two bins
shall be centrally located within the project, and shall be constructed
prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six
feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a gate which
screens the bins from external view.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, Revised Permit No. 1
Planning Correction No. 1
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check
approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
All existing structures on the subject property shall conform to all the
applicable requirements of Ordinance 348.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in
amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to
ouarantee the installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance
~ith the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one
year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and SaFety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be
healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall
be properly constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or g~,eater, shall be
installed underground.
29. Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department a six foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed
along the entire perimeter of the project excluding where building walls
substitute for required wall as shown on Exhibit A, Planning Correction
rio. 1. The exterior side of all perimeter masonry walls and building
sides {if used in place of portions of walls) shall he coated with a
protective coating that will facilitate the removal of graffiti. The
required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the
Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director.
30. This approval shall become null and void on June 6, ~Q~ 2015. {Amended
per P.C. 6-6-90}.
Prior to any use allowed by this plot plan, the applicant shall obtain
clearance from the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section
that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with
Ordinance No. 348.
1e
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy
or any use allowed by this permit.
JHR:jg
5/24/90
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
LeRo', D Smoot
RO&D C0',t',t!5510\E~ & COL',Ti S,
November 15, 1989
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Re:
(Mini Warehouse)
CU 2980 - Revision #1
Team 5 - SMD #9
Parcel 1 of PM 23687
AP #111-111-111-9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect
referenced item,
recommendations:
to the conditions of
the Road Department
approval for the above
has the following
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this
permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at
no cost to any government agency: ~
1. Provide evidence of legal access.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed
by this permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Road Department the sum of $5,390.00
towards mitigating traffic impacts for signal require-
ments.
This amount represents 3.08 acres x $1,750.00 per gross
acre = $5,390.00.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any
government agency:
Lyndie Lane (from Parcel 1, PM 135/40-41, to Rancho
California Road shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt
concrete paving (20 feet north of the centerline of Lyndie
Lane and the remaining 20 feet south of said centerline)
match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or
resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road
Commissioner within the existing dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A.
(interim section)·
COUNTY ADMINISTRATPJ CENTER ,, 4080 LEMON STREET · RJVERS1DE, CALIFOILNLA 92501
CU 2980 - Revision #1
November 15, 1989
Page 2
10.
All driveways shall conform
County Standards and shall
improvement plans.
to the applicable Riverside
be shown on the street
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with P/P 874-X.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461. The County Service Area (CSA)
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies
under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the
land owner shall file, after receiving tentative approval,
for an application with LAYCO for annexation into or
creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance
with Governmental Code Section 56000.
A striping plan is required for Lyndie Lane and Rancho
California Road. The removal of the existing striping
shall be the responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing
and striping shall be done by County for~es with all
incurred costs borne by the applicant.
The applicant shall provide offsite road improvements along
the north side of Rancho California Road from Lyndie Lane
westerly to match the existing full width paving in
accordance with County Standard No. 100. (no curb and
gutter required, asphalt concrete dikes may be required for
drainage control). This is necessary for highway safety
due to additional traffic entering Rancho California Road
at this location.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Con~nissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict ~
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
CU 2980 - Revision #1
November 15, 1989
Page 3
11.
n J: jw
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district; the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Ve.ry truly yours,
. t ~L---~son
Technical Eng. Unit Supervisor
County of Riverside
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLAN~ING DEPT.
TO:
DATE:
November 3, 1989
ATTN: Jo
FROM: ~iTi[~I~NE~'/"'~NVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO..2' 3-
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Conditional Use Pcrmi~ 2980,
Revised No. 2 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water scrvicc5 aru
available in this area. Prior to any building plan submittals, "will-~cr\'u"
letters from the water and sewerlag agencies will be required.
SM:tac
NOV - 8 1989
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING D~PARTMENT
RIVERSIDE CCU~jl y
PD' ']N!r4G DEPA~!'A.:~I~T
6EN FUR.M 4. (Rev
KENNETH L EDWAF~DS
1995 MARKET S'~EE'
P O BOx 1033
TE~,Em~HO~E 714 787-2C'5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 925C2
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional.._Team N . 2 Re:
PlannerS,/~,~
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable riles and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
y///lhe District's report dated (~7-/~'-f~>2' is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~avJhbeee~r°ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
Very truly yours,
KASHUBA
<~
t~Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: / /'~
KENNL"T'H L,. [DWA/~DS
CHI[F ENGINrrR
liigg MAWK['I'
P 0 BOX
Tr~.EPHONE: (7141
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
September 15, 1988
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrativ~ Center
Riverside, California
Attention:
Regional Team No. 1
Patti Nahill
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
Conditional Use Permit
No. 2980
Amended No. 3
This is a proposal to construct a mini-warehouse in the Temecula
Valley area. The site is between Ynez Road and Moraga Road about
600 feet north of Rancho California Road.
Our review indicates that the northwest corner of the property is
within the Long Canyon Wash 100 year flood plain. The applicant
proposes to leave this area natural. According to the applicant,
the onsite flows would be collected and conveyed with the interi-
or driveways to the Long Canyon Wash.
The Board of Supervisors has adopted the r.lurrieta Cr~eek/Temecula
Valley Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of collecting drainage
fees. Those fees are used to construct needed flood control
facilities within the particular area. The Area Drainage Plan
fees apply to new land divisions and are normally not required of
other types of new development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff.
These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds
where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti-
gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff,
the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans
and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation
charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar
to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following are the District's recommendations:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid· The charge
shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate
multiplied by the area of new development. The new
development in this case includes a total of 3.08 acres.
At the current fee rate of $932 per acre, the mitigation
charge equals $2,871. The charge is payable to the Flood
Control District prior to issuance of permits. If Area
Drainage Plan fees or mitigation charges have already
been paid on this property in conjunction with an earlier
land division or land use case, the developer should con-
tact the District to ascertain what charges are actually
due.
-2- September 15, 1935
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Conditional Use Permit
No. 2980
Amended No. 3
The area within the Long Canyon Wash 100 year flood plain
should be kept free from buildings and obstructions.
Erosion protections should be provided for all the fill
slopes which are subject to potential erosion hazards.
A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and
may affect "waters of the United States"~ "wetlands" or
"jurisdictional streambeds", therefore, in accordance
with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance
Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through
73) and County Ordinance No. 458:
a. A copy of appropriate correspondence and necessary
permits from those government agencies from which
approval is required by Federal or State law (such as
Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish
and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the
District prior to the final District approval cf the
project.
5. A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along
with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations
should be submitted to the District for review and ap-
proval prior to the issuance of grading or building
permits.
QuestioAs concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang
of this office at 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
co:
JMG & Associates
KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,
RC:pln
Pl~nninS & Engineering Office
46-209 Ouis SWeet. Suite 405
lndio, CA 92201
(639) ~42-8886
P,,I'v'ERSIDF COUNTY
FIP-JE: DEPARTM[,NT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE -
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PF~OTECTION
GLEN J. NE!~'IAN
}~RE CHIEF
11-3-89
tIT O~ ~
PL'nmnS & LnSineerins O~ce
4080/~mon SU'eet, Sui~:e ] 1L
Riverside, CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PATTI NAHILL
CONDITIONAL USE 2980 - REVISED #2' ~
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department reconmends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating presJure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped
system (6"x4"x2tx2t), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than
165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved
vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from
any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures·
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review· Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s)· A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included on the title page of the building plans·
Subject: conditional Use 2980 Page 2
7. Install a supervised waterflow fire alarm system as required by the
Uniform Building Code.
8. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
9. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
10. Gate to have keypad entry with emergency power back-up. Code will be
assigned prior to final for Fire Department's access.
1i.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
12. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Wes Alston, Deputy Fir~Marshal
area
Aclministrative Oenter · 1777 AUanta Avenue
Riverside, OA 92507
December 7, 1989
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: J. Rostow
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Conditional Use ,2980, Revised :1
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the following: ~
° Temecula Valley Unified School District
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
conform with an approved floor plan indicating the maximum
number of tenants allowed. Each space shall be labeled with
a number or a letter.
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Administration (714)682-8840 · (714)787-2020
Planning Department
CU 2980, Re~i:.ed ~1
December 7, 1989
Page 2
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Very~.t~ly yours,
o t L~' a e s ~~
b~~'~'~
Senior Land Use Technician
/sn
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
C~LANNING/J.R. ~
WENDY NICHOLSON
November 16, 1989
CUP 2980
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
pLANNING DEPAR'~ M~N']'
The information provided on this project did not include a conceptual gradin~
plan. However, sufficient information was supplied for us to recc==end
approval with the following conditions.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct frcn
the Building and Safety Department.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable infcr~aticn
from Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120,284-21,284-~6,
and 284-46. Thank you.
REOUIRED PROPERTY OWNERS. NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
APPLICATIONS FOR:
PARCEL MAPS
TRACTS
ZONE CHANGES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
PUBLIC USE P~RMITS
W1ND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
18.30 PLOT PLANS r. eOu.r,n~ Env~ro..me~;.
Al,.tessments ev~uttdamny.COmme,c~a
In0uStr~81)
VARIANCES
~MPORA~Y USE PERMITS
The follOwtrig items will be reQu,fld It the ttme o~ tiding 04 the el)Ore r~Oted Case IDOhClt~ons
1. 'P~NO .denft..It packages to be mienloci m wparlte eta" X 12h" ~njl envejoNs TNse enveloNs shah ~notclle 1no =ase
numNr ind the ~rO ~NIs.'ln~ IMH contim the foll~mg:
I. One ~ Ht of gum~d iNI$ ~n~t~ ill tN PrON~ ~ne~ '~meS Ind the raiding 8Odre~es th8~ are ~ ,~,~ a
~t mdaus ~ me e=ten~ ~ their DrONNO ~o~ ~s I~t Ihlll N i~e~l~ne~ from the IiS~ eQual,zoo
MH~ment roll .)
A ~t~y ~ t~ IforemenhoNd
C.ON iNt for the ID~nt ~Ner.
One/Ni for the ~er.
e. FO~ ~ND DIVISION CASES ONLY :An 8~" X 1 r' mOu~,~
2 F~r ~H~ ~ti ~ gum~ iNli ~ the I~l:~nL ~r ,e~inNr ,l~a rl~llentlhve w~th t~r mining leatosses
mclude OuDIi~le Rti ~ere i~lant In0 ~r,etc.lre the B~ The. Ihou~
~lDle~ to the outs,Oe ~ ~e ~ t~ i~e ~ni~ envies ment~ee m ,era I I~ve
wdt not preNre ~ ~ffi~ t~ DrOH~y ~r hit (m ~ffidation fo~ ~1~)
4 On I CODy Of your e~hs~it ~ tentlt~ mid Ih~ ill N~els wffhen 3~teet On the mad .Dfml the nlmes Of Ill D'O~y owno's
wdhm 3~feet I$ t~y Ire hlt~ On the gum~
The Ibove noted mfOrmlt,On ely be obts:ned by contectmg I tille :nsurlnce COmDIny en the R~vers;oe Coun',y Iret
PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICA]ION
purlulnt tO IDDtt. lftOn reQulrementl furnelh~l by the RiverltOe County plnmng DeDl~ment SIt0 hit st I CoreDlore I~ true
COmDdlhOn Of ~ner ~ the subject DrON~y IM iII Other Dryly ~e~ wdhm 3~ feet ~ the OrO~rty mvoIveo m the
tiOn In0 ~1 MMa u~n tM Stilt eaull~e0 IlMMment rolls
I fU~r Ce~ tMt the i~orNtion fi~O ~ t~ IM c~e~ to IN NIt ~ my k~e. I une~tln0 t~t ~Orrect Or err o~eous
~fOrNt~ ~y N grounN f~ ~ion Or Nn~l ~ the Ip~ghOn.
NAME: . ;be_ Keith _Companies,
TITLE/REGISTRATION: .J~.m. ~occissey, SenioE.Pl_a_n~.er
6296 River Crest Drive S~:e. K
ADDRESS: - -
RivecsZde, Ca 92507
714-653-0234
IN'lONE: ....
EIGNATUFIE: '~~__~C~' ' '..'ql,~' .a, ~.~__ _
DATE: ........
.lSe~-Sp~
CASE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOOR
4080 LEMON STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
Joseph A. Richards, Planning Director
A I~UBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to
consider the application(s) described below. The Planning Depar~ent has
tentatively found that the proposed project{s} will have no significant
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planning Commission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative
declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing.
Place of Hearing: Board Ro~, 14th F1 oor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Date of Hearing: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 6, 1990
The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below.
Any person may submit written c~nments to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public
information counter Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.n. unt~ 4:00 p.m.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED 1, EA 34398, is an application submitted
by Linkletter Partners for property located in the Temecula Area and First
Supervisorial District and generally described as being at the terminus of
Lyndie Lane and made pursuant to Ordinance No. 348, Riverside County Land Use
Ordinance which proposes an additional level on building "B" of CUP 298C
(mini-warehouse). (jR)
TIME OF HEARING: 2:00 P.M.
L~)re
P.O. Box 125
Temecula, Ca
92390
oak Tree Associates
c/o Hyder & Co.
7315 Highway 101 No. 2A
Solana Beach, Ca 92075
McDavell Elon F
6501 Crista Palma Dr.
Huntington Bch Ca 92647
lar & Associates
~ ~ Prospect
La Jolla, Ca 92118
First Baptist Church
Rancho California
42101 Moraga Road
Rancho California Ca 92390
Steve grown
The ~ ..... ~h Companies ~
6296 River Crest Drive
Suite K
Riverside, Ca 92507
Rancho Commercial Center
29400 Rancho California Rd.
Rancho California Ca 92390
Radnor Landgrant Rancho
California Town Center
c/o Landgrant Develop. Inv.
12625 High Bluff Dr. #212
San Diego, Ca 92130
Temecula Union School
District
41951 Moraga Road
Temecula, Ca 92390
Linkletter Rc Partners
748 W. Baker Street
Costa Mesa, Ca 92626
:IiVE:L DE county.
'PLanturK; E RCmEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) NUMBER: ,'~ ~ % (~ ~
PROJECT CASE TYPE(S) AND NUMBERS(s): ~_ (~ fo
APPUCANT'S NAME: /~ ;rA ~a
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E,at:
t t
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
STANDARD EVALUATION
MODULE NUMBER(S):
~<~ R~q. /')rv~ I
7~O~j/(',.r--
DESCRIPTION (include propolwd minimum lot ~ize Ind ~ u Ippllcable):
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s):
9;/- =J/c"b-
D. EXISTING ZONING: /q '~j ~'-//(5-/a
E. PROPOSED Z(;)NING:
F. STREET REFERENCES: A/O/'L-h~.v,,/-~ 57' o-'~
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? ,~
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
G,
He
SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS
:,;.::;--..,,,,,:/. ,,.-,,,,., ,,,,, ,,..,,,,,,.,,
IL COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN MACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check the &opropriate option(s) below end Ixoc;3d Icco4'dingly.
E;} All or pad of the project site is in "Adopted Sl:)ecific Plans," "REMAP' or "Rancho Villages Community
Policy Areas". Complete Sections III, IV (B end C only), V end VI.
[3' All or part of the project site is in "Areas Not Designated Is Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV
(A, B end D only), V end Vl.
I""i All or pad of the project lite hl~ In Open Sl~ce Ind Cortlervation clelignation other than those mentioned
above. Complete .,~ections III, IV (A, B, end E only), V end %/I.
III.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Indicate the nature of the proposed land u~e as determined from the deec~ption8 as found in Cornfxehenslve General Plan Figure
%/1.3 (Circle One). This information is nacegary to determine the appropriate lend u~e suitability ratings in Section III.B.
Cdtk~ Elleltial Noffnal-High Risk ~l-Low Risk
Indicate wtth a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any anvtronmental hlz. lrd end/or relource ilmjel rnly significantly effect or be affected
by Ihe propolal. NI ribrancid figure= ire conlNned in the C~ eeneal PIin. Fo~ Iny illue marked yes (Y) write
~ddlti~nal d~te~ur~ncie~nmJ~ted~find~r~fact~:~nymitig~tk:mrn~under~1~nV. Aleo, whee indicated,
HAZARDS
1. N NQuist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault 12.
Hazard Zones (Fig. %/1.1 )
NA PS U R (Fig. VI.3)
LiQuefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VIA )
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.4)
Groundshaking Zone (Fig V1.1 ) ~
NA S PS U R (Fig. V1.5)
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps) 15.
Landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale
Seismic Maps or On-Nte Inspection) 16. _.)Z
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hazard (On-site Inspection) 17.
Expansive Soils (U.S.DA. Soil 18. ~
Conservation Service Soil Surveys) 19. __
Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation 20.
Service Soil Surveys) 21.
Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (Fig. %/1.1, ;;: :~
Oral. 460, Sac. 14.2 & Ord. 484)
Dam Inundation Area (Fig. %/1.7) 24. A/
Floodplains (Fig. %/1.7) 25.
NA U R
7. H
9-/%/
10._.N_N
11.
(Fig. %/1.8)
Airpod No~e (Fig. 11.18.5, 11,18.11
& %/I.12 & 1984 AiCUZ Report, M,A.F.B.)
NA A B C D (Fig, VI. 11 )
Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - V1.16)
NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
Highway Noise (Fig. VI.17 - VI.29)
NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 )
Project Generated Noise Affecting
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI. 11 )
Noise ,Sef~altive Project (Fig. VI.11 )
Air Quality Irr~cts From Project
Project Sensitive to Air Quality
Water Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Water Quality
Hazardous Materials and Wastes
RESOURCES
;76~ Agriculture (F~. V1.34- V1,15) 32,_~
In or Nee en AghCulturll Preserve 3,3.
(Riv. Co. Agricultural Lend Converterion 34./V
Contract
wt. me Fig. W.36- .3n
Vegetation (Fig. VI,38 - VI.40)
__ Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI.42) 36.
31. N Energy Resource= (Fig. VI.43 - VI.44) 37.
Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.45)
Historic Resources (Fig. VI.32 - VI.33)
Archaeological Resources
(Fig. VI.32 - %/1.33 & %/I.46- VI.46)
lalleontoloeicll Resources
(Paleontological Resources Map)
Other
Other
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable
U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted A - Generllly Acceptable
B - Condittcmally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged
e
IV. LAND U~E DETERMINATION
A. Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", 'REMAP" or "Rancho
Villages Community Policy Areas."
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s):
2. LAND USE PLANNING AREA:
3. SUSARF. FANV:
4. COMMUNITY POUCY AREA, IF ANY:
COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY: <~'o
COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY:
-'F-/C deS,:- elr 0 .<g
For all projects, inidcate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may significantly affect
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Ran. For any issue
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consuited, findings of fact, and mitigat~ures under Section V.
PUBUC FACILJTIES AND SERVICES
7- ,,/
8 '~
9.
Circulation (Fig. IV.1-IV. 11. Discuss in
Sec. V Existing, Planned & Required Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. N. 12 - IV. 13)
Water (Agency Letters)
Sewer (Ageqcy Letters)
Fire Service~ (F~}. WAS - N.18)
Sheriff ~ (F'~g N.17 - N. 18)
Schoote (Fig. N.17 - N.18)
Solid Weste (Fig. N.17 - N.18)
Perks and Regeetion (F~g. N.19 - N.20)
Equestr~n Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV.24/
Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Maps)
Utilities (Fig. IV25- N26)
Ll:twies(Fig. N.17 - N. 18)
Heelth Sefvice~ (Fig. IV.17- IV.18)
Airports (Fig. 11.18.2-11.18.4,
11.18~ - 11.18.10 & N27 - IV~36)
15,___~ DlaasterPmparednees
16. ~/CitySpheceoflnfiuence
17. Ol~r
Ce
If il or pert of the project is ~clld in "Adopted Specific Plans", "FIEMAr or "Rancho Villlges Community Policy
Areis", review in detail the Ipecffic policiel ipplying to the I~(~,l~lll, Ind complete lhe tollowlng:
1. Stata the relevsnt land use deNgrltion(s):
2. Baeed on this initll etudy, i ~e ~ cormiste~qt with the poticies and dasignationa of the eppropriate document.
m~l therefore consistent wtffi the Coml:eher~ive General Ran? ff not, explain:
LAND USE DETERMINA'rlON (continued)
ff all or Dart of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open S0ace", end is not in a Community Ran, complete
questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Ran.
Current land use categoryties) for the site based on existing conditions. Also indicate land use
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) ("'z'i"/'e~,D/~
3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be reeoived 8t the da~al:21:x,w.~t stage? Explain:
4. Community Ran designation(s):
5. Is the prop<xed project consistent with the policies and ~ations of the Community Plan?
ff not explain: y~'~,<;
6. Is the proposal compatible with exiting and proposed surrounding land uses?
ff not, explain:
7. Based on this initial study, is the propotsal consistent with the Comprehensive General Ran?
ff not, reference by Section 8ncl Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies: 7~
E. ff all or part of the project site is in 8n Open Space end Conmervation designation, complete the following:
1. Slate the designation(s):
2. Is the propeeal consistent with the designation(s)? ff not, explain:
e
Based on this initial study, is the prc~l conN~ent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
ff not, reference by Section and Issue Number thoee le4ues identifying inconsistencies:
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES
A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION ~TIO~
ISSUE NO. _' REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NO,DATE)
For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and W.B, iderttlfy the Section and il~ue number and do the
following, in the format as shown below:
1. List all additional relevant data sources, including Igertcles cortmjIted.
2. State all findings of fad regarding enviro~qmental concerns.
3. State specific mitigation measures, if idenile without requiring an anvirOrtmentN impact repod (E.I.R.)
4. ff additional information is recluired before the anvironrnental assessment can be completed, refer to
Subsection A.
5. If sdditional sheets are needed to complete this ~-'tion, check the box at the arid of the section and attach
the necessary sheets.
SECTION/
ISS4JE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MIT,~ATION MEASURES:
V. INFORMATION SOURCI~S, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continue)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
nT,
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
I ~ V~. - / /
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
[] The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and · Negative Declaration may be
prepared.
'~/T~e)project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, thee will not be a significant
effect in this case becaule the mitigltion measures described in Section V have been applied to the
project and a Negative Declarltion may be prepared.
(or)
[] The project ~
may have a q3nificant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report
Nlma .- I)8te: JC'/
V. INFO RMATIOM SOURCES, fiNDINGS OF FACT A~ HITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
~f~-/
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
/~~
?~ '0 "~""' ~' ~7~'6~ :~:' c,
~ FEE:' ! / f"7'D ,s~"mW, E::S ,~
I). SUBICei~IUIIC[:.
xovu~to D mmxooux r'-'l
/iIT'L I.;T$; NEGiI'I,T!~:.
kse Fee:
Ibmbar of Acres
hnd~r of Lots
Mdfttoml kNs
El Fee (lisa)
CASE FEE IR[AK ~ ,--.
.- -: IiVE=I. iDE-coun .v R. Annin6 DEPAq'G;En ._
P,..: , IIPPLICATION FOR LAND IISE lIND DEVELOPMENT
1LEMONST.,~THFLOOR 46-209 OASIS ST., ROOM 304 27403 YNEZ RD., SUITE 212
,vERSIDE, CA 92501 " -INDIO, CA 92201 RANCHOCALIFORNIA, CA 92390
14 (714) 676-7730
~'/} 787.6181 .. (619) 342-8277
r"JSPECIFIC PLANS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS TEAMS 1, 2, 4, 5 INDIO OFFICE TEAM 3
, (714) 787-6356 (714) 787-6183 (714) 787-1363 or 787-1373 (619) 342-8277
.. 'REFUND OF FEES
Vheneve~ an application is terminated, upon request of the applicant a refund of fees paid may be made by fie Planning Department in
iocordance with the Refund Policy Statement adopted by the Board of Supervisors. If any portion of the ap~ication fee has been paid out by
~e Planning Department to another jurisdiction or agency for services to be rendered in connection with the application, no refund of that
,artion of the fee shall be made by the Planning Department to the applicant until bhe other jurisdiction or agency authorizes the Planning
)epartmem to refund that portion of lt~se fees. The Planning Department shall retain a processing fee of $60.00 from the total amount to be
_dundeal. lOrd. 348).
further certify that the application filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that incorrect or erroneous informmion
~ay be grounds for ~jc~-tjon, denial, or delay of the application.
:~SENO, F:""P I 000026d
E : CEiMPAr~IE~ ~2'~5 RIVER CF'EST RIUF~BI[;E ~r's 92'~-~~
~SI ~ ~O~SS ~. ~A~ ~P
.INKLETTER, PARTNERS 7~5 BAKER R~ERSIDE CA 92626
~~A~ t ~ ~. ~A~ aP
~DD ADDITIONAL STOREY TO BUILDING 8
ERMINUS OF LYNDIE LANE
KE:ITH
OF CUP 2980
!""'" "'"'
~ :. --- · COMMENT/MISCELLANEOUS
.,COMPANIES .' . AMOUNT PAID $ 698.00
coun .u-i t. nnin6 Dii lal/nc_
F-' :APPLICATION FOR LAND USE ltND DEVELOPMENT
'.~1'~ LEMON ST 9TH FLOOR 46-209 OASIS ST., ROOM 304 27403 YNEZ RD., SUITE 212
RSIDE, CA '~,?.501 INDIO, CA 92201 FIANCHO CALIFORNIA, CA 92390
. 4) 787-6181 " '" .'(619) 342-8277 (714) 676-7730
SPECIFIC PLANS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS TEAMS 1, 2, 4, 5 INDIO OFFICE TEAM 3
(714) 787-6356 (714) 787-6183 (714) 787-1363 or 787-1373 (619) 342-8277
."- ' FIEFUND OF FEES
~/henever an application is terminated, upon request of the applicant a refund of fees paid may be made by the Planning Department in
tccordance with the Refund Policy Statement adopted by the Board of Supervisors. If any portion of the application fee has been paid out by
qe Planning Department to another jurisdiction or agency for services to be rendered in connection with the application, no refund of that
olion of ff~ fee shall be made by the Planning Department to the applicant until the other jurisdiction or agency authorizes the Planning
)el}arm ,-: ',o refund that portion of those fees. The Planning Department shall retain a processing fee of $60.00 from the total amount to be
elunded. lord. 348).
further certify that Ihe application filed is tTue and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that incorrect or error~ous information
nay be grounds for rejection, denial, or delay of the application.
,'NAME
.........
~alEER/;EP~NTATTVE NAME
" i 000026P
CrrY, STATE, Z~P
~,'296 Rl,lEp r-~::c.~ ,~lLIc'pc'~r.r' Ffl
:NU I RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR REU I SED
'ERM I NUS OF LYND I E LANE
KEITH
CUP 2980
B. PROJECT IN[ORMATION
The purpose of this application is to amend previously
approved CUP2980. This amendment proposed an increase in
height for Building B only, from one (1) story to two (2)
story. The other site factors, such as, architectural design
and building to building separation will remain the same. It
is also important to note that the number of parking spaces
are not required to change, since parking is based upon the
number of employees, not the square footage of the structure.
The number of employees will not change from the number
originally contemplated. The maximum height of Building B is
21'-4".
9878-C777-001
TE:
October 24, 1989
:IiVE=i iDE COUnCu,
PL, nninG DEP, ARClilEn
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety - Land Use
Building and Safety -ISrading
Surveyor - Ken Teich
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service- Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Muncipal Water District
Rancho CAlifornia Water District
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
General Telephone
Cal Trans #8
Temecula Union School Districts
Elsinore Union High
Corm~issioner Turner
San Bernardino Museum
UCR Arch Unit
Community P1 ans .~..
RECEIVED IN
ARU
0 C T 3 0 1989
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO.
2 - (Tm-5) - E.A. 34398 - The Keith
Companies - Rancho California Area -
First Supervisorial District - Terminus
of Lyndie Lane - R-3 Zone - 8.27 Acres -
REQUEST: Add additional story to Building
B - Mod 119 - A.P. 921-310-008
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting. has been tentatively scheduled for ~ovembe~ 16, 1989. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing. ;
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to November 16, 1989 in order that
we may include them in the staff~'eport for this particular case.
Should you have any questions ~egarding this.item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Ristow at 787-1363.
Planner
DATE: /o/~/~/' SIGNATURE
PLEASE print name and title
COMMENTS:
T'Re arr~ ~a~s 5urvc,~le°l
EASTERN ;~rC~MATION CENTER
A'chascrc~cs~ ~'=Sr;arCh Unit
U~i'verShtY ~ Ca~t.jrnia
mvers~a~ CA 9252~
,~NOV 2 1989 ~
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
pLANNiNG DEPARTMENT
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
qATE:
October 24, 1989
RiVER3iDE COUnC,u
PL,&nninG DEP, ARCnlEn
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety - Land Use
Building and Safety -~rading
Surveyor - Ken Teich
Road Department
Heal th - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Muncipal Water District
Rancho CAlifornia Water District
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
General Telephone
Cal Trans #8
Temecula Union School Districts
Elsinore Union High
Con~nissioner Turner
San Bernardino Museum
UCR Arch Unit
Con~unity Plans
elease review the case described
N 0 V 8 1989
RNERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO.
2 - (Tm-5) - E.A. 34398 - The Keith
Companies - Rancho California Area -
First Supervisorial District - Terminus
of Lyndie Lane - R-3 Zone - 8.27 Acres -
REQUEST: Add additional story to Building
B - Hod 119 - A.P. 921-310-008
above, along with the attached case map. A Land
16, 1989. If it
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for November'
clears it will then go to public hearing.
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to November 16, 1989 in order that
we may include them in the staff-report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions ~egarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Ristow at 787-1363.
Planner
COMMENTS:
°t2--(-.--51o -oos-8
DATE: NOV 03 1989 SIGNATURE
PLEASE print name and title c.,= ,,.,,*~
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787'6181
46'209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342'8277
OATE: 'October 24, 1989
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety - Land Use
Building and Safety-LGrading
Surveyor - Ken Tei ch
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service- Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Muncipal Water District
Rancho CAlifornia Water District
Southern Cal i forni a Edi son
Southern Cai ifornia Gas
General Telephone
Cal Trans #8
Temecula Union School Districts
Elsinore Union High
Commissioner Turner
San Bernardino Museum
UCR Arch Unit
Community Plans ~
RiVE=I iDE COUn u,
PL, nnin DEPa =l [nEn
NOV 15
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
pLANNtNG DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO.
2 - (Tm-5) - E.A. 34398 - The Keith
Companies - Rancho California Area -
First Supervisorial District - Terminus
of Lyndie Lane - R-3 Zone - 8.27 Acres -
REQUEST: Add additional story to Building
B - Mod 119 - A.P. 921-310-008
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting. has been tentatively scheduled for fiovemb,r 16, 1989. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing. :
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to November 16, 1989 in order that
we may include them in the staff 'report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Ristow at 787-1363.
Planner
COMMENTS: The project is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Excavation
will impact nonrenewable paIeontologic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a program
to mitigate impacts to paleontologlc resources. This program should include:
(1) monitoring of excavation by a qualified paleontologic monitor; {2) preparation of
recovered specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils; (3)
curation of specimens Into an established repository; a(~ (4) a report of findings with
complete specimen Inventory. ~
DATEq:I/1 ~/89 SIGNATURE ""x,j ~
Dr. Allan D. Griesemer, ,Museums Director
PLEASE print name and title
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787'6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342'8277
County of Riverside
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
DATE:
November 3, 1989
FRO ONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2980, REVISED NO. ~ 1
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Conditional Use Permit 2980,
Revised No. 2 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are
available in this area. Prior to any buildinS plan submittals, "will-serve"
letters from the water and sewerins aSencies will be required.
SM:tac
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PL/','INING DEPARTMENT
GEN. FORM 4, (l~v, 8/87)
Coura y of R xrex s de
~8
Keith Companies.
12-12-89
Jim Morrissey
john Ristow t'Planner
CUP 2980 Rev. I Planning Correction Revisions to Exhibit A
1. - Remove references to Substantial Conformances and show proposed
location of wall.
2. - 100 yr flood plain-label & show boundary of flood plain.
3. - Show location and "typical" of drainage swale in order to
provide a 5 ft. planter for screening trees along interior
of northern wall.
4. - Label easement.
5. - Label or remove dashed line running through northwest section
of project.
6. - Move 50 ft. wall south of Building F west 3 ft. to provide
planter area on exterior of wall for landscape buffer.
7. - Provide adequate landscape buffer along eastern bound ry of
project adjacent to residentialy zoned property, excluding east
wall of Building F.
8. - Provide adequate den e landscaping along northern and northwestern
project Bmndary to ~uffer and screen mini-warehouses from view
of adjacent residenially zoned parcels. Landscape screen should
include approved speciman trees that will achieve a size of 40-60
ft. at maturity. Landscaping should be located so as not to
interfere with flood plain o) easement restrictions.
g. - Label vacant northwest portion of project "not a part".
10. - Label Building B "2 story".
11. - Building A may be built to property line.
12. - Building F may be extended north to 5 ft. planter.
13. - Label surrounding zoning and uses.
14. - Landscaping and Irrigation plans showing number, location,
genus, apd species shall be submitted for Planning Dept.
approval.
County of Riverside
TO: Building and Safety -
Temecula - Jim Miller
FROM: Planning Department - John Ristow
RE: CUP 2980 Revised Permit #1
DATE: June 20, 1990
The Riverside County Planning Commission approved CUP 2980 Revised Permit #1
Planning Correction #1 on June 6, 1990. A revised landscape plan has been
required and prior to issuance of a building permit those plans must be
submitted to the Planning Department~ior to issuance of occupancy permits
the revised Landscape Plans must be approved by the Planning Department.
JR:al
GEN. FORM 4. IRev. $/871
::IiV : iDE COUrl ,u
PLAI'Irlii'IC DEPA::I !TI rI
TO:
Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor
Road Department
Health
Fire Procectio~
Flood Control District
Please review the attached A, cnded lla. p 8 for ~he above mentioned case.
If you have any further comments.or recommendations ve request :hem prior
co'~A~ ~, , in order that ve may include them in :he staff repor~
for this particular case. ~
Should you have any questions reEarding this i:e~, please do not hesitate
to contact at 787- .
C OMMENT S:
S ZGI~AI'1JILE
P~;~SX print name and ~t~le
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
THE KEITH COMPANIES
Inl;~nd EmD~rr, Inc
4
John Ristow
Riverside Count~ Planning Department /
4080 Lemon Street 9th Floor DEC 08 ~8~ ~
Riverside, Ca 92501
Re: Release of Bond
Dear Pamela,
~ RIV~'RS~DE CO
' i. ANNiNQ D,FtDA.~UTT~7~f.NT
The insurance company for the owners of the Rancho California
Town Center is holding a bond for the construction of a block
wall along the northeasterly property line of the Town Center.
The wall, owned by Linkletter RC Partners, was required if the
adjoining property was to be developed residentially. Since it
is to be developed commercially the wall is no longer required.
(Please reference CUP 2980 and PP 10492). The slope between PP
10492 and the Town Center has been already landscaped. That
portion between CUP 2980 and the Town Center is paved except for
that portion of the site which is to be landscaped by Linkletter.
This landscape areas is within their property ownership
boundaries and will be completed as part of the conditions of the
CUP.
The County of Riverside acknowledges by the signature below that
the foregoing information is correct. I hope this information is
satisfactory. ~
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Jim
Morrissey.
Sincerely,
THE KEITH COMPANIES -
INLAND EMPIRE
Representative(s) of the County
of Riverside Planning Department
Print Name and Position
~tu~re
Print Name and Position
~J'~, E.,~ Cr.~ Dr.~ .~t.' K. N.m~.'. C4 92~07 (714) 6~3 0234 F~V (714) 6~3
WILLIAM H. PATRICK & ASSOCIATES · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2t'~"3 RANDOLPH AVENLE, COSTA MESA, CAEIFORNIA 92626 (714) 546-1282
18 April 90
Mr. John Ristow
County of Riverside
Planning Department
4080 Lemon St. 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Re: Linkletter Facility - Rancho California
Dear Mr. Ristow,
We feel that the planter areas located along the west
the project are of sufficient size to accomodate the
specified plant material.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Cordially
WILLI ~RICK & ASSOCIATES
Jeff Williams
Project Manager
side
WILLIAM H. PATRICK · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CALIFC~NIA---~0SINESS, TRANSPOeTATIC)N AND HOUSING AGENCY~
'E{EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SAN ERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 .
TDD (714) 3L1-4~09
October 31, 1989; k
NOV - 3 B89,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GEORGE DEUKN~EJIAN, Go~n~or
Development Review
08-Riv-15-5.50
Your Reference:
CUP 2980
Planning Department
Attention John Ristow
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Mr. Ristow:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Conditional
Use Permit 2980, Revised No. 2 located north of Rancho California
Road on Lyndie Lane near Rancho California.
This proposal is somewhat removed from an existing state highway.
not appear to have a significant effect on the highway
system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of
continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to
mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be
provided prior to or with development of this area.
We have no specific comment on this proposal.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J.
Neville at (714) 383-4384.
Very truly yours,
~. N. LEWANDOWSKI
District Permits Engineer
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
September 25, 1990
Plot Plan No. 11345
PREPARED BY:
Charly Ray
RECOMMENDAT ION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Plot Plan
No. 11345 based on the findings and subject to the
Conditions of Approval contained in the attached County
Staff Report dated April 23, 1990; and the added Condition
of the City of Temecula Engineering Department.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Mr. Henry D. Testasecca
REPRESENTATIVE:
Same as above
PROPOSAL:
Request for approval to add 1,800 square feet of
commercial retail shops to an existing commercial
structure. Total area subsequent to addition equals
8, 197 square feet.
LOCATION:
South side of Main Street; approximately 200 feet
west of Front Street.
EXISTING ZONING:
C-1 I General Commercial).
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: C - 1
South: C - 1
East: C - 1
West: C - 1
EXISTING LAND USE:
Commercial retail shops.
STAFFRPT\PPl1345 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERNS:
BACKGROUND:
DISCUSSION:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial retail.
Commercial/professional offices.
Commercial retail.
Commercial / residential hotel.
Liquefaction potential.
Date of original submittal to County of Riverside:
June 30, 1990.
Date of tentative approval by Riverside County
Plannin9 Director: April 23, 1990.
Date of transmittal to City of Temecula: May 7,
1990.
The project is consistent with the Southwest Area
Community Plan, meets the requirements of
Ordinance 348, and is compatible with adjacent
commercial land uses. Condition of Approval No. 29
requires compliance with recommended mitigation
measures addressin9 liquefaction potential.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FEES TO BE COLLECTED:
The processing of the application was completed by
the County of Riverside. No development
application fees are available to reimburse the City.
Prior to issuance of building permit,
$1,300. O0 is to be deposited with the
Riverside County Road Department. This
sum will be utilized for traffic impact
mitigation purposes.
Fee Calculation:
No. of Acres 0.25
Gross Acres X 2,500
Fee $1,300. O0
CR:ks
Attachments
STAFFRPT\PP113 4 5
PLANNING DIRECTOR' S BEARING
CASE SUMMARY DATE: 03-26-90
CASE NO. PLOT PLAN 11345, Amended No. 2 E.A. No. 34061
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: An existing furniture store with an 1800
square foot addition south of Main St., and west of Front St., in the newly
incorporated City of Temecula.
AREA: Temecula
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE: City of Temecula
GENERAL PLAN:
a. LAND USE: Category II, Commercial
b. OPEN SPACE/CONS.: Areas Not Designated as Open Space.
c. COMMUNITY POLICIES: Southwest Area Community Plan
d. ADJACENT: Existing Commercial
ZONING:
a. SITE: C-1/C-P
b. ADJACENT: C-1/C-P
LAND USE/AREA DEVELOPMENT:
a. SITE: Existing furniture store
b. ADJACENT: Commercial, Residential
MAJOR ISSUES: Liquefaction, Subsidence, 100 Year Floodplain, Wildlife
Habitat (SKR), Historic Resources.
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. 34061, and
APPROVAL of PLOT PLAN No. 11345, Amended No. 2, based on the following:
The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and
Ordinance 348.
2. The proposal is compatible with area development
Environmental concerns can be mitigated at the development stage
through the conditions of approval.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
Continued from
CASE SUMMARY P.C.: 03-26-90
DATE: 04-23-90
CASE NO. PLOT PLAN 11345, Amended No. 2 E.A. No. 34061
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: An existing furniture store with an 1800
square foot addition south of Main St., and west of Front St., in the newly
incorporated City of Temecula.
AREA: Temecula
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE: City of Temecula
GENERAL PLAN:
a. LAND USE: Category II, Commercial
b. OPEN SPACE/CONS.: Areas Not Designated as Open Space.
c. COMMUNITY POLICIES: Southwest Area Community Plan
d. ADJACENT: Existing Commercial
ZONING:
a. SITE: C-1/C-P
b. ADJACENT: C-1/C-P
LAND USE/AREA DEVELOPMENT:
a. SITE: Existing furniture store
b. ADJACENT: Commercial, Residential
MAJOR ISSUES: Liquefaction, Subsidence, 100 Year Floodplain, Wildlife
Habitat (SKR), Historic Resources.
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. 34061, and
APPROVAL of PLOT PLAN No. 11345, Amended No. 2, based on the following:
1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and
Ordinance 348.
2. The proposal is compatible with area development
3. Environmental concerns can be mitigated at the development stage
through the conditions of approval.
William Perry
28636 Front St.
Temecula, CA 92390
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended No. 2
Project Description: Existing furniture store
and an 1800 square foot addition
Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-045-019
District/Area: Temecula
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for an existing
furniture store and an 1800 square foot addition.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims,
action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents,
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an
approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal
boards, or legislative body concerning PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended
No. 2. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the permittee of
any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside
and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding
or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date;
otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated
by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that
as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, Amended No. 2, or as amended
by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of
one (1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Road Department's transmittal dated 12-04-89, a
copy of which is attached.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in
accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County
Health Department's transmittal dated 02-27-90, a copy of which is
attached.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended No. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside
County Flood Control District's transmittal dated 01-24-90, a copy of
which is attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal
dated 11-03-89, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal
dated 12-20-90, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal
dated 12-14-89, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Riverside County Geologist's transmittal dated 04-17-90, a copy of
which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
Landscape, Irrigation and Shading plans prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed
and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth
condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway
shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, six (6) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall
meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12., and shall
be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of
Ordinance No. 348.
The irrigation plan shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 348,
section 18.12 and include a rain shut-off device. In addition, the
plan will incorporate the use of in-line check valves, or sprinkler
heads with incorporated check valves to prohibit low head drainage.
A minimum of TEN (10) parking spaces shall be required in accordance
with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. TEN (10)
parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A.
The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a
minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended No. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
18.
19.
20.
21.
A minimum of ONE (1) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as
shown on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped
shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign
constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be
smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the
interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches
from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking
facility, not less than 17 inches by 22, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed
at or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking
place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol
of accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department Riverside County Flood Control
Environmental Health Fire Department
Building & Safety - Grading
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use
Division of the Department of Building and Safety.
If additional signage is proposed other than that which is pre -
existing to this approval, a separate plot plan accompanied by the
appropriate fees as set forth in Ordinance No. 348 shall be submitted
and approved by the Planning Department prior to sign installation.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in
substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit M-1 (Materials
Board) and Exhibit M-2 (Color Elevations).
22.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view.
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Screening
PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended No. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and
Safety Department, a six foot high solid wood fence shall be
constructed along the east, south, and west property lines. The
required fence shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the
Department of Building and Safety.
A total of ONE (1) trash enclosure which is adequate to enclose a
total of ONE (1) bin shall be located within the project, and shall be
constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. The enclosure
shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a
gate which screens the bin from external view.
Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum
height of six (6) feet at maturity.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees
along streets and within the parking areas.
All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved
wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be
relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning
Director.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of
Building and Safety, a geotechnical report shall be submitted for
review and approval. This report shall be based upon, but not be
limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical
conditions incorporating an analysis of potential for subsidence or
ground fissuring. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development
is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be
demonstrated.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply
with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the
provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the
fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
A total of FOUR (4) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in
convenient locations to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11345, Amended No. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in
amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls and fences in
accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the
planting for one year shall be filed with the Department of Building
and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The
plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kV or greater, shall be
installed underground.
Prior to any use allowed by this plot plan, the applicant shall obtain
clearance from the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use
Section that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance
with Ordinance No. 348.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to
occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
JA:jsa
03-07-90
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City C~uncil/City Manager
Engineering Department
September 18, 1990
Additional Conditions of Approval for
Plot Plan No. 11345
ADD THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
Prior to Occupancy:
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
JM:ks
STAFFRPT\PP113 4 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
PLANNING/J.A.
WENDY PARFa~
December 14, 1989
11345 - ADDITION TO FURN. STORE
AMENDED #2
The inform~tiCn provided on this project did not include a conceptual grading
plan. However, sufficient information was supplied for us to recommend
approval w~th the following conditions.
ina~Yg e i o to construct from
the B~ilding and Safety Department.
County of Riverside
TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNNING DEPT. DATE:
ATTN ~ J £ Adams
FROM~rmental Health Specialist
RE: PLOT PLANS N0. 11345
FEBRUARY 27, 1990
IV
Enviormental Health Services is in reciept of the requested information
concerning water and sewer. We therefore, no longer have any objections
at this time.
SM;srv
MAR 1 19~u {~
RIVENSIDE COUNI Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JanuarV 24, 1990
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention:
Regional Tc~im No. 5
Jeff Adsroe
Ladles and Ge:~tlem,~n:
Plot Plan 11245
Amended No. 2
This is a proposal to construct a second story addition to a
furniture start on 0.4C ~cres in the Temecula area. Th,: site is
located south of Fibrin L-treet apDroxlmately 100 feet west Of Front
Street.
The entire site xs located within the 100 year flood plain of
Murricta Creek. ?he ,.x~sting buildings are not adequately ele-
vated and will probably suffer flood damage during large storms,
The District dOL's not obj,-ct ~o the proposed adrJltion. ~;ew con-
struction .qh.~uld co~plv ;-zlth ~-11 a.oDlicable ordinances.
Questions cone~,rn~r~q thl s matter m~y be refer~-ed to Zully Smith
of this offic~_ ~t '114/7~7-2704.
V~-ry truly yours,
J'Diil~ h, K.:"~'.;hU[~ '~
S,.nior CIvil L'.!gzn~.er
OFFIC~ OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
~~.~ AD AND SU~,VEY
RODEPARTMENT
-
LeRoy D. Smoot
ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNT"/SURVEYOR
December 4, 1989
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVF CENTER
MAIUNG ADDRESS
P.O. BOX 1090
RIVEILSIDE, C~,LIFORNIA 92502
(714/787-6554
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Re:
(Furniture Store)
Plot Plan 11345 - Amend #2
Team 5 - SMD #9
AP #111-111-111-9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect
referenced item,
recommendations:
to the conditions of
the Road Department
approval for the above
has the following
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this
permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at
no cost to any government agency:
No additional right of way shall be required on Main Street
since adequate right of way exists.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed
by this permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Road Department the sum of $1,300.00
towards mitigating traffic impacts for signal require-
ments.
This amount represents
acre = $1,300.00.
0.52 acres x $2,500.00 per gross
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any
government agency:
Main Street shall be improved with asphalt concrete dike
located 20 feet from centerline and match up asphalt
concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing
paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 30
foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard No. 104, Section B.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER * 4080 LEMON STREET * RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
Plot Plan 11345 - Amend #2
December 4, 1989
Page 2
10.
11.
LJ: jw
Asphalt emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section
11.1.
All work done within County right of way shall have an
encroachment permit.
The single driveway shall conform to the applicable
Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street
improvement plans.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict only
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Planning & Engineering Office
46-209 Oasis Street Suite 405
indio, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
RIVt I,LSII)I (¢)IINIY
tlR! DIJ~AR I M!:N'I
IN COOPEI~A1tON WIIH
CALIFOf~NIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE P~TEC11ON
GLEN J. NEWMAN
HR[ CHIEF
11-3-89
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: PATTI NAHILL
RE:
PLOT PLAN 11345 - AMENDED #2
Planning & Engineering Offu:e
4080 l.~mon StriP, Suite 11L
Rivesside, CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced
plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection
measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or
recognized fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the
remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure
established in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must
be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire hydrant
(6"x4"x2~x2~), located not less than 25 ft. or more than 165 ft. from
any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
4. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
5. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-iOBC.
Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
6. 2 hour separation wall will be required between existing and new construction
or building must be retrofitted with complete fire extinguishing system.
7. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in
Building and Safety.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff·
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
ml
December 20, 1989
cl)epot, t,.e.t od < ui{ di.g a.d qc, det l
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Jeff Adams
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Plot Plan 11345, Exhibit A, Amended #2
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
If the proposed project is to be "phased," an approved exhibit
indicating which structures and on-site improvements are
required for each "phase" should be required.
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the following:
° Temecula Valley Unified School District
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
provide the Land Use Division with evidence of recordation
of a Certificate of Parcel Merger.
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
Planning Department
PP 11345
December 20, 1989
Page 2
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Ground fissure area - grading clearance required prior to
issuance of building permit.
yOUrS)
Robert~
Senior Land Use Technician
/sn
April 17, 1990
=eiVE=l iDE counc,u
PL,annin( DEP, A=IC~IEnC
California Geo Tek, Inc.
42030 Avenida Alvarado, Suite A
Temecula, CA 92390
Attention:
James E. Lasater
Bruce R. Lee
SUBJECT:
Liquefaction Hazard
Project No. 8S3WRC-524
Plot Plan 11345
A.P.N.: 922-045-019
County Geologic Report No. 717
Temecula Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled:
"Subsidence Hazard Report Zone Evaluation, Proposed Commercial
Construction, 42050 Main Street, Portion of Block 28, Rancho
California, Riverside County, CA," dated September 29, 1989; and
"Addendum to Subsidence Hazard Report Zone Evaluation, Proposed
Residential Construction, 42050 Main Street, Rancho California,
Riverside County, CA," dated December 19, 1989.
This report determined that the liquefaction potential at the
subject site is considered very low. Liquefaction mitigation
measures are unnecessary for this site.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent
manner and satisfies the additional information requested under the
California Environmental Quality Act review and the Riverside
County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval of the report is
hereby given.
SAK:bam
cc:
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLA/qNING EPARTb .I|T
Joseph A. Ri~hards, Planx ng Dir ctor
Henry Testasecca - Applicant
Norm Lostbom - Building & Safety (2)
Planning Team 5 - Jeff Adams
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E
BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
, LOCATION':'-""~ff~t'~
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11345 TO
PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF 1,800 SQUARE FEET OF
COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPS, SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN
STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WEST OF FRONT
STREET I"THE EMPORIUM").
WHEREAS, Mr. Henry D. Testasecca filed Plot Plan No. 11345 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zonin9, Plannin9 and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Planning Director considered said Plot
Plan on April 23, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Director's hearing, the Director
recommended approval of said Plot Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to
said Plot Plan on September 25, 1990, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission
proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
the following findings:
Findings.
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty ~30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
STAFFRPT\PPl1345 1
~1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
{a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
c~nsidered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, I hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 11345 proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
STAFFRPT\PPl1345 2
!b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
Ic)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
( 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan
requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law
and City ordinances.
(2) The overall development of the land is designed for
the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare;
conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible
with the present and future logical development of the
surroundin9 property.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
project will
Declaration,
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
therefore, is hereby 9ranted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No.
11345 for the operation and construction of commercial retail shops located on the
south side of Main Street, approximately 200 feet west of Front Street subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Resolution.
STAFFRPT\PPl1345 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 1990.
RON PARKS
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
25th day of September, 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
JUNE GREEK
CITY CLERK
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\ PP113 4 5
ITEM NO.
11
CHARLES M. CALDERON* RITA J. TAYLOR
PETER M. THORSON* STEVEN J. DAWSON
LAW OFFICES
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
ONE WiLSHt~E BUILDING
624 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE. IITM FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
(213) ~36-O600
1805) 987-3468
PLAZA
September 11, 1990
OF COUNSEL
DWIGHT A. NEWELL
WRITER'S DIRECT DiAL
213-236-2821
OUR FtLE NO,
02351-006
The Mayor and Members of
the City Council
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
Re:
Stephens Kangaroo Rat Section 10(a) Permit
First Amendment to Agency Agreement/California
Endangered Species Permit
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Attached are two additional documents which require
your approval in order for the City of Temecula to
participate in the federal and state programs to provide
habitat protection for the endangered Stephens Kangaroo Rat
("SKR").
The first is an application for a federal permit
for incidental take, pursuant to section 10(a) of the
federal Endangered Species Act. This permit, upon approval
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, will constitute a
grant of federal authority for any incidental "take" of
habitat or the SKR.
The second is a FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGENCY AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT. This document is the
state counterpart of the federal section 10(a) permit. It
replaces an earlier document, a Memorandum of Understanding
("MOU"). It is necessary because the California Department
of Fish and Game insisted on technical changes in the MOU.
The Mayor and Members of
the City Council
September 11, 1990
Page 2
Should the Council approve the FIRST
counterpart copies should be executed.
AMENDMENT, two
As the City Attorney has previously explained, your
action on these documents is exempt from CEQA, as an
Environmental Impact Report has already been prepared.
Should you have any questions I would be pleased to
try to answer them.
Very truly yours,
· YOUNG, JR.U
for BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
Eric.
cc:
David F. Dixon, City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
rcy/LTR09112
Direthor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Office of Management Authority
P.O. Box 27329, Central Station
Washington, D.C. 20038-7329
Call (202) 343-4955 for help or information.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. IriSH AXD3IILDLIF[ $[1~1C[
FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE
UC[NSE/"PERMIT APPLICATION
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
4 c -a;m_.fA*,- .S a,., ,~.: . D.a.. CO',,,;.E"'E T,.,(
, -E,~xT . w( G,,.T
;a'( "g 8 G-. C;.:.a .a P :;.;in (tgS
N/A
5 .::A*" :.~. ,.-,T..=..c Pe*';_'c-Lr: .*:T...~v '5 T: 6F.
Western Riverside Co~ulty
"~,keP'Omt OP [XPOPT i.,aCgNSE
8R,E~ r'gS"P,mT,::)~r OF AC?kVlTy irOR II/N.C~q RrE;.dlrSTLr; i,;CE~e,$E:
Oe PEI;%,., T ~$ hagBED.
ENDANGERED/THKEATL~ED SPECIES
XX Take (Section 10(A))
Import
Export
Municipal Government
ETC. Ronald J. Parks
Mayor
C~RI~I~ATIQe% th~diCATE ~.TATIr ,h
N/A
I ,F Pg:%,.PF," iv aNT STATE
s 25.00 as ~ssible two years
SEE REVERSE
C[ITIFICATIOM
HEREBY CERTIFY T~AT I NAVE READ AND Am FAMILIAR wiTIf THE REG4JLAT1ON$ CONTAINED IN TITLE SO. PART 13. OF TI4E CODE OF FEDERAL
RE~jLATION$ AN; TI'eE OTHER APPLICABLE PARTS iN $~JBCIqAPTER 8 OF OIAPTER I OF TITLE .~. LN0 I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE INFOR.
· ATION SUBMITTED im THiS APPLICATIDN FOR i LICENSE PERmiT l$ COMPLETE AND ACC~It, ATE TO ThE BEST OF mY KNOWLEDGE AND KLIEF.
~.DERSTAND ThAT ANT FALSE STATE·ENT HFREiN SAT SUBJECT mE TO TME (::RillNil.. PE)eALTIE$ OF |1 U.$.C. 1801.
?, * Applican~ listed in 3 above or principal officer listed in 5 above must
sign.
COHPLETE THE
8.
ENDANGERED OR THREATEXED WILDLIFE & PLANTS
FOLLOWING:
Species:
Dipodomys Stephensi, Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
- (scientific and comon names)
b. Quantity:
d. Identifying features of wildlife
c. Birth ~ate and sex of wildlife:
(e.g., tattoo ~, ISIS #,
scars, etc.):
e. Name and address of party from whom wildlife or plant will be obtained:
At time of application, wildlife or piant {i) is still ~n the wild ;
{ii} has been removed from the wild ; or {iii) was born in captivity
or artificially propagated . Prov"T~e country and specific location of
wild origin or captive propagation:
,aTTaCH
g,
T~E POLLO6'IrlG I?IPO~,ATIOU OU'PLAIN WHITE PAPER: See attached docaaments and cover letter.
removal from the wild (i.e., the use of specimens r t captivity or produced in captivity, etc.).
Name and ac~ress of institution Or facility where wildlife or p. lant will be used, displayed or
maintained.
A statement justifying the permit including: 1) purpose. objectives, whether Similar w~rk has alreaCy been
done, an~ methods (attach research prOpOsals, if appropriate), 2) resume of the technical expertise of the
pe,SonS COnOuCttng the activities, and 3) planned disposition of specimens upon temination of activities.
Copies of contracts and agreements that identify duration of activities and persons involved in the
activities for which the permit is sought. Will funding be available for the completion of the proposeC
activity?
COPy Of any foreign, state or other Federal pennies required. (Note: If species is listed on AbDen~iz I o{
CITES. and you plan to export a specimen, send a copy (Or evidence of issuance) of the CITES import Oe-~it
issued by the Hanagement Authority of the Country to which you plan to export it; this is not requlree ~Or
specimens that qualify under CITES criteria as Ore-Convention, Captive-bred or Artificially PropagateO.)
1. If live wildlife or plants to be covered by the permit are to be held in captivity:
Give a complete description, including phOtOgraphS and/or diagrams, of the area and facilities wlnere
wildlife or plant will be held and/or maintained in captivity and describe arrangements for care ~uring
transportation and maintenance, if applicable.
2. ~esume of persons who wtll Care for ltve specimens including any experience they have had in raising,
caring fo-. A,~ ........ ~-~ similar wildlife or plants.
3. List mc-~ ; your activities with these or similar species in the last 2 years·
4. Indicate your ~l~ngqess to participate in a cooperative breeding or propagation program or to
contribute data to a studbook, if applicable.
5. If born in captivity or artificially propagated outside your facility, provide certification of such
from breeder or propagator.
If the planned activity includes import or e=port and the species are listed under CITES, describe the
type, size and COnStruction Of any shipping Containers and the arrange~nts for watering an~ otherwise
caring for the wildlife or plants during transportation·
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGENCY AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGENCY AGREEMENT/CALIFORNIA
ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT ("First Amendment") is entered into by and
among the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (the "Department"),
the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"), the CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE
ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE AND TEMECULA ("Cities")
and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY (the "JPA").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Department, the County, the JPA and the
CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS AND RIVERSIDE
have entered into that certain AGENCY AGREEMENT/CALIFORNIA
ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT ("Agency Agreement") dated for reference
purposes as of September 4, 1990;
WHEREAS, the Department, the County, the JPA and the
CITIES OF HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE AND
TEMECULA desire to amend the Agency Agreement to include the CITY OF
TEMECULA as a party;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing
recitals and mutual covenants and undertakings provided herein, and
other considerations, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Agency Agreement is hereby amended to add the CITY
OF TEMECULA as a party.
2. This First Amendment shall become effective as of the
date fully executed by all of the parties hereto.
3. The terms and conditions of the Agency Agreement not
expressly amended by this First Amendment shall continue in full
force and effect.
IN WIT~ESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First
Amendment to the Agency Agreement as of the date or dates set forth
below.
Dated:
ATTEST:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND GAME
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of
Supervisors
CITY OF HEMET
By:
Mayor
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Signature page continued)
- 2 -
Mayor
CITY OF PERRIS
By:
Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Mayor
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By:
Chairman of the Boar<]
- 3 -
AGENCY AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT
THIS AGENCY AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated for reference
purposes only as of September 04, 1990, is entered into by and
between the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME (the
"Department"), the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"), the CITY OF
HEMET, CITY OFLAKEELSINORE, CITY OF PERRIS, CITY OFNORENOV~LnEY
AND the CITY OF RIVERSIDE (individually "City" and collectively the
"Cities"), and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
(the "JPA") with reference to the following:
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat ("SKR") is listed as a
threatened species by the Department and the Department has
recommended changing its status to endangered; and
WHEREAS, the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (the
"Service") has listed the SKR as an endangered species effective
October 31, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities have submitted to the Service
a Short-Term Habitat Conservation Plan for the SKR (the "Short-Term
HCP") and have entered into, with the Service and JPA, an
Implementation Agreement (the "Implementation Agreement") in
connection with an application for a Section 10(a) Permit (the
"Section 10(a) Permit") which would allow the incidental taking of
the SKR and its habitat within the HCP fee area (as described in
the Short-Term HCP) subject to certain limitations and conditions
as set forth in the Short-Term HCP and the Implementation
Agreement; and
WHRREAS, The County and Cities desire to obtain a permit from
the Department to allow the taking of SKR and its habitat within
the HCP fee area in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth in the Short-Term HCP, the Implementation Agreement and this
Agency Agreement and Permit; and
WHEREAS, Section 2081 of the Fish and Game Code authorizes the
Department, through permits or memorandums of understanding to
authorize individuals and public agencies to take any endangered
species, threatened species or candidate species for scientific,
educational or management purposes; and
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing
recitals and the mutual covenants and undertakings provided herein,
and other considerations, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Department hereby grants to the County and the Cities
a permit authorizing the taking of the SKR and its habitat within
the HCP fee area in accordance with and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Short-Term HCP and Implementation
Agreement subject to the following modifications and conditions:
A. The County and the Cities signatory to this
Agreement, acting through the JPA will acquire off-site mitigation
lands, protect such lands and provide for the long-term operation
and maintenance of such mitigation habitat on an acre-by-acre
basis. The permittees acting through the JPA will acquire and
2
protect an acre of mitigation land for each acre of habitat
occupied by SKR populations. "Occupied habitat" shall be that
habitat as identified in the report Assessment of PoPulation and
Habitat Status (O'Farrell & Uptain) as modified by the Service's
approved field surveys.
B. This non-exclusive Agency Agreement and Permit shall
be effective for two (2) years; however, in the event the
signatories or their agents have not, in the judgement of the
Department, fulfilled the terms of the Short-Term HCP and the
Implementation Agreement as modified, the Department shall have the
ability, after the end of the first six month reporting period to
suspend or revoke this Agency Agreement and permit pursuant to the
provision of Section 1.L. hereof. In such event, the Department
shall, at its option, reassign, revise, review or retain the permit
authority.
C. The Department shall have a right of first refusal
on all mitigation lands acquired or conveyed by the JPA within the
San Jacinto Wildlife study area. Lands shall be offered under this
paragraph at no cost to the Department and all lands shall be
offered in fee to be conveyed to the Department through the
wildlife Conservation Board. The JPA shall reserve a portion of
the ten percent (10%) O&M set aside for lands scheduled to be
conveyed to the Department in the San Jacinto Study Area. At such
time as the JPA transfers land to the Department pursuant to this
paragraph, it shall also convey to it a portion of the ten percent
(10%) operation and maintenance set-aside fund. The amount shall
3
be the percentage represented by acres conveyed to the Department
divided by 4,400 or the amount of acres purchased, whichever is
greater under the Short-Term HCP.
D. Parties acknowledge that the California Endangered
Species Act (CESA) has no provisions for "incidental take" as
defined in federal law. For the purposes of this Agreement, all
permit actions resulting in "incidental take" as provided for in
both the Short-Term HCP and Implementation Agreement shall be
evaluated consistent with the management objectives of the CESA.
E. "Acquired" as replacement habitat shall mean for
this Agreement any one of the following:
(1) Ownership by the JPA, or its designee of a fee
interest in occupied SKR habitat. Such interest shall be
contingency-free and free of liens or mortgages. For purposes of
calculation at the end of any accounting period as provided in the
Short-Term HCP or Implementation Agreement, an Order of Immediate
Possession authorizing the JPA to take immediate possession of
occupied SKRHabitat pursuant to an action in eminent domain which
action is being diligently pursued shall also be considered
acquired.
(2) Ownership of a perpetual wildlife conservation
easement in a form approved by the Department over and upon
occupied habitat.
F. "Protected" shall mean for this Agreement the
following:
Fee title or a conservation interest approved by the
Department in replacement habitat lands shall be vested in a public
or private wildl~fe protection agency including the Service, the
Department, the Nature Conservancy, or other entities approved by
the Department and organized exclusively for management of
biological resources. Such vesting shall be completed within two
(2) years of the date of this Agreement.
G. Any take of the SKRauthorized by the Department pursuant
to this Agreement and permit shall commence on the date hereof and
shall automatically terminate and cease concurrently with the
revocation or termination of the federal Section 10(a) Permit by
the Service unless terminated or revoked pursuant to the terms
hereof.
H. All proposed modifications of the study areas and HCP
boundaries shall, concurrently with submittal to the Service, be
forwarded to the Department's Endangered Species Coordinator for
review and approval. The Department shall complete its review
concurrently with all lead agency environmental review activities.
I. This Agreement is intended to implement the provisions of
the CESA (Fish and Game Code 2050 et seq.). All violations of the
California Fish and Game Code or its regulations are criminal
misdemeanors unless otherwise provided. (Fish and Game Code 12000).
The parties intend to conform to the objectives of the Short-Term
HCP and the Implementation Agreement insofar as those provisions
are consistent with state law.
The permittees, under this Agreement, will be authorized to
take habitat occupied by SKR on the following basis for projects
and activities as follows:
(1) Projects subject to CEQA (Pub. Resources Code 21000
et seq.) and sponsored by the permittees acting in their
proprietary capacity.
(2) Projects where the permittee is a lead agency under
CEQA and the environmental documents have been made available to
the Department.
(3) Ministerial projects located outside of the SKR
study areas.
(4) Projects categorically or statutorily exempt from
the CEQA (Pub. Resources Code 21000 et seq.) if those projects are
located outside of study area.
All individuals, corporations, public agencies and other
entities "taking" occupied habitat under authority of the signatory
agencies permit shall be responsible for compliance with CESA as
provided for in this Agreement, which incorporates the Short-Term
HCP and Implementation Agreement.
The unauthorized taking of occupied habitat shall be deemed
for the state law purposes to be take of individual animals
consistent with federal case law authority (see Palilia v. Hawaii,
(9th Cir. 1988) 852 F.2d 1106).
In the event any permittee or other individual has taken
occupied habitat in contravention of this Agreement, the
signatories to this Agreement will promptly take appropriate action
to terminate the unlawful act and shall immediately notify the
Department's Wildlife Protection Division and the District Attorney
of Riverside County.
J. In addition to any other requirements or obligations of
the County or any City under the Short-Term HCP or the
Implementation Agreement in the event the County or any City has
knowledge that any person, firm or entity has disturbed or is
disturbing any occupied habitat within the HCP fee area without
payment of the appropriate mitigation fee or otherwise in
contravention of the terms of the CESA, the Short-Term HCP, the
Implementation Agreement or this Agency Agreement and Permit, it
will promptly take appropriate action to terminate the disturbance,
or in the case where the disturbance has been completed, it will
refuse, to the extent permitted by law, to issue any permits for
the use or occupancy of the disturbed parcel until a mitigation fee
has been paid or other appropriate action or mitigation has been
taken.
K. In addition to any other remedies set forth in the Short-
Term HCP or the Implementation Agreement, the Department shall be
empowered to exercise all legal and equitable remedies available to
it to assure compliance with the terms of this Agency Agreement and
Permit and shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, to audit
the records of the JPA, the County or any City, and to revoke,
terminate or suspend the right of any land owner or other person to
enjoy or have the benefit of, or the rights and privileges under
this Agency Agreement and Permit by terminating or suspending the
right to take SKR and it's habitat pursuant hereto in the event of
a taking of SKR habitat by any such land owner or other person in
violation of the CESA and terms of the Agency Agreement and Permit.
7
L. The DeFartment shall be guided by the following terms in
the suspension or revocation of any permit issued under this
Agreement.
1. The permit to take occupied habitat may be revoked or
suspended as to all permittees or as to any one signator to this
Agreement.
2. The permit to take endangered species is a privilege
and as such may not be vested as a property interest nor an
entitlement subject to due process protections beyond those
provided herein.
3. Within 15 days of suspension on revocation the
Department shall provide notice to the affected permittee and
request the permittee/signator and those taking under authority of
the permittee to compensate the state for damage to all trust
resources including the loss of occupied habitat.
In the event cure in the form of compensation has not
been provided within 30 days of notice, the Department may suspend
or revoke the privileges granted under this permit.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of duplicate
originals.
N.
Any amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be
in writing shall be executed by all of the parties hereto.
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date or dates set forth below and this
Agreement shall -become effective as of the date it is fully
executed by all of the parties hereto.
DATED
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND GAME
/
/
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DATED
By
DATED
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By
DATED
CITY OF HEMET
By
DATED
CITY OF PEERIS
By
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
DATED
By
DATED
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By
DATED
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT
CONSERVATION AGENCY
By
9
SC~m~LM A
.Map of San Jacinto Study Area
10
ITEM NO.
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE: September 25, 1990
SUBJECT: Riverside City/County
Understanding
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
Waste Generation Study - Memorandum of
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of
Understanding with the County of Riverside for Waste Management Generation Study.
BACKGROUND: The California State Legislature passed AB 939 which mandates
each city and County within the State to complete waste characterization studies.
The County and cities within the County have decided to cooperate in a joint study
to meet the requirements for each separate entity.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County will pay for the entire initial waste generation study
and will also pay for the cost of the four annual updates out of the recycling fund
portion of the landfill tipping fee.
SUBMI'FTAL'I'O, ThE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Waste Management
FROM:
SUBMITTAL DATE: June 26, 1990
SUBJECT:
Memorandum of
incorporated
Riverside County
for completion of
Understanding between and the
Cities of the County a waste
generation study mandated by state law, and reduction of tipping
fees for selected loads to be diverted for investigation.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1. Approve the attached
Cities in the County.
Memorandum
of Understanding
with all
Authorize the
the Director
copies of
execution.
Chairman to execute the agreement and direct
of the Waste Management Department to forward
the agreement to the individual Cities for
Authorize the Director of Waste Management to:
direct commercial haulers whose loads have been selected by
the Department's consultant (for waste stream sampling) to
deliver these loads to centralized landfill sorting
facilities.
C.A.O. RECOMMENDAI ION:
Approve
reduce by 50% the tipping fees for loads diverted from their
normal landfill delivery point to regional waste stream
sampling points providing, however, if any loads are diverted
from Blythe to the regional sampling point in the Coachella
Valley these loads shall have the entire tipping fee waived
and a comparable amount be reimbursed by the Department to
the affected hauler for his diverted loads· (CONT'D)
,
L ~[~ ' ~
rector
o % NANe,A
"'Lost Revenue" is offset b] the
reduced cost of the C0nsu]tant's
study.
Administrative O~cerSignature~,~,~--~-~-~--~/~~x--'~-
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORM ,l(Rev 12~821
On motion of Supervisor Dunlap, seconded by Supervisor Abraham
and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the above
matter is approved as recommended,
Ayes:
Get ]d A. Ma hey
Absent: Ceniceros and Larson
Date: June 26, 1990
xc: Waste Hgmt., Personnel, Auditor
Younglove, Dunlap and Abraham
None
Prev. Agn. ref.
Depts. Comments Dist.
AGENDANO.
8 .81
Fll - MOU Between Riverside County and the Incorporated Cities
June 26, 1990
Page 2
JUSTIFICATION: Assembly Bill 939 mandates that each City and Cour~ty
complete a waste generation study to be included in the required
Source Reduction and Recycling Element. Individual jurisdictions
can complete the'study as a group as long as data gathered is
specific to each jurisdiction. The cooperative group effort was
proposed as a strategy to achieve economies of scale and consistency
in sampling reports. The consultant chosen, was selected jointly
by representatives of the Cities and the County following receip~ of
competitive proposals from five firms.
In order to keep the costs of the study down, the consultant
proposed diverting some refuse haulers' trucks from their usual
landfill destination to one central landfill for the eastern County
and one central landfill for the western County. The effectiveness
of this strategy relies upon the cooperation of the individual
haulers. This method creates an inconvenience for some haulers who
would be traveling a longer distance to the centralized landfill.
The installation of a reduced tipping fee for impacted loads w~uld
provide a form of compensation for this inconvenience and incentive
for cooperative participation in the study.
FINANCIAL: The reduced tipping fee is estimated to cost the County
$15,000 to $20,000 for the lost revenue being waived by the
recommended authorization. Sufficient funds are available in the
various impacted accounts to absorb this loss of revenues.
RAN:mfa
Attachment
co: CAO
.J
CL 'RK'S COpy
dUN 2 6
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWE.~
TfiE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TBE CITIES OF RIVERSIDE 'COUNTY
TEIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("M~) is entered into this
day of dUN ~ 6 , 1990, by and
between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County") and the Cities
(the "Cities") whose signatures are affixed hereto with reference
to the following:
RECITALS
WTIEREAS, The California State Legislature has passed Assembly
Bill ( "AB" ) 939 into law; and
WHEREAS, said bill, AB 939, mandates each City and County within
the State of California to complete waste characterization
studies for inclusion in the source reduction and recycling
elements; and
W'EEREAS, a single waste characterization study ("the study") can
be completed by more than one public entity and still contain the
necessary information for each separate entity as mandated by AB
939;
WHEREAS, the County and the Cities desire to cooperate together
in a joint study in order to meet the study requirements for each
separate entity;
NOW, TEEREFORE, the parties do hereby mutually express,
the other, to agree to the following:
each to
1. AGREEMENTS.
A. COOPERATION
The County and the Cities agree to cooperate in good
faith with each other throughout the duration of the study. The
County and Cities also agree to cooperate in good faith with the
waste generation consultant and to supply all available
information requested by consultant.
B. PAYMENT
(1) The County will pay for the entire initial waste
generation study and will also pay for the cost of the four
annual updates out of the recycling fund portion of the landfill
tipping fee.
JUN 2 6 1990
(2) If additional work is contracted for by the County
to cover extra work not heretofore contemplated which is agreed
to be .done as .part of thi~ contract .-by all ..cities,__e.ach .Ci.ty
shall pay a share of the unfunded portion ..in~.an .amount_directly
proportionate to-the population of the indiwi,dual .jurisdiction.as
shown in concept on Exhibit_,A" attached~hereto. _
C. TERM
The initial waste generation study shall cover an
estimated 8 month time period. Four annual updates shall
thereafter also be completed under the .terms of this agreement.
D. TERMINATION
(1) This agreement shall not apply to any City which
elects not to execute the MOU within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the MOU by the County, and no separate study funded
by the County shall be made for that City.
(2) Termination of this Agreement by any of the Cities
shall be preceded by forwarding written notice of intent to
terminate to the County thirty (30) days prior to the anticipated
termination date.
(3) The terminating party will be required to meet all
financial and nonfinancial responsibilities accrued up to and
including the effective termination date.
(4) The County reserves the right to terminate this
agreement at any time prior to completion of the services to be
furnished by its consultant, if for any reason consultant is
unable to perform the work herein contemplated. Prior to
termination, the County shall notify all Cities in writing and
immediately sponsor a coordination meeting with all affected
agencies in which the parties shall formulate a plan of action to
complete the study.
2. DEFINITIONS.
The following
as follows:
terms when used in this MOU shall be defined
1.1 "County" means the County of Riverside,
subdivision of the State of California.
a political
1.2 "Cities" means those incorporated areas that are within
the political subdivision that is the County of Riverside and are
parties to this Agreement. These cities include Banning,
Beaumont, Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Corona, Desert Hot
Springs, Hemet, Indian Wells, Indio, Lake Elsinore, La Quinta,
Moreno Valley, Norco, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Perris, Rancho
Mirage, Riverside, San Jacinto, and Temecula; and the presently
unincorporated areas of Calimesa, Canyon Lake and Jurupa which
are also pursuing Cityhood status.
1.3 "AB 939" means Assembly Bill 939 -- The California
Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989, chapter 1095 of
the Government Code. ·
1.4 "Waste Characterization-Study" shall'mean that study
required by Assembly Bill 939 and described in 'detail-by the
Integrated Waste Management .Board .Emergency Regulations dated
June', 1990 sections 18722, 18724, 18726 and appendix 1.
1.5 "Total Population" means the total amount of persons
residing within the political boundaries of said entity.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Memorandum of Understanding on
written.
parties have executed this
the day and year first above
ATTEST: JUN 2 6 1990
By: CHAIRMAteD OF
CITIES
By:
(Continue with all
participating Cities signing)
EXHIBIT A
Example of Additional Work (Assuming $75,000) Cost
Jurisdiction
Unicorporated County
Banning
Beaumont
Blythe
Calimesa (*)
Canyon Lake (*)
Cathedral City
Coachella
Corona
Desert Hot Springs
Hemet
Indian Wells
Indio
Jurupa (*)
Lake Elsinore
La Quinta
Moreno Valley
Norco
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Perris
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
San Jacinto
Temecula(* *)
Total
Approximate
Population
277,550
20,950
9,750
8 400
8 000
9 600
31 750
14 950
70 000
11 200
35 650
2 700
36 000
70 000
15 950
11 850
114 900
25 350
20 650
32 100
18 900
9 250
218,500
15,300
20,450
1,109,700
Jurisdictions'
% of Total Proportionate
Pop. Share
25.01% 18,758.45
1.89% 1,415.92
0.88% 658.96
0.76% 567.72
0.72% 540.69
0.87% 648.82
2.86% 2,145.85
1.35% 1,010.41
6.31% 4,731.01
1.01 % 756.96
3.21% 2,409.43
0.24% 182.48
3.24% 2,433.09
6.31% 4,731.01
1.44% 1,077.99
1.07% 800.89
10.35% 7,765.61
2.28% 1,713.30
1.86% 1,395.65
2.89% 2,169.51
1.70% 1,277.37
0.83% 625.17
19.69% 14,767.50
1.38% 1,034.06
1.84% 1,382.13
100% $75,000.00
* Assuming Incorporation measure passes in November 1990.
Source for population figures: LAFCO
* *Source: Riverside County Planning Department, Building Permit
Activity Report, Jan. 1990
Population Source: D.O.F., Jan. 1990, the three LAFCO figures have
already been subtracted from the Unincorporated figure.
THE COL;N'I"Y OF RI\'ERSII)E
R~BI-RT A. NEI.S()N
g.~ g _- ......
June 22, 1990
Frank Aleshire, City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Riverside City/County Waste Generation Study/
Memorandum of Understanding
Dear Mr. Aleshire:
The Riverside County Waste Management Department has been
negotiating with the consultant, (CH2M Hill, California, Inc.),
that was chosen by a City/County selection panel to perform a
Waste Generation Study for all local jurisdictions in Riverside
County. The Agreement also includes provisions for the
consultant to perform the four annual updates for each
jurisdiction that are required by State law. The total cost for
the Waste Generation Study and the four annual updates is
$667,000. Funds are available to meet the cost of the Waste
Generation Study out of the accumulated tipping fee
contributions. This same funding source will be used to cover
the proposed cost of the four annual updates. The Agreement will
be considered by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on
Tuesday, June 26, 1990. The contract is enclosed for your
information.
It is anticipated that the Board will take an action on the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the County and Cities
concerning the Waste Generation Study and four annual updates on
the same day, June 26, 1990. A copy of the MOU is attached for
your consideration and action. Please note two things about the
MOU:
Section B (2) states that the cost of any extra work that is
required to be contracted by the County, but is not
contemplated at this time, and is agreed to be done as part
of this contract by all Cities shall be covered with each
City paying a share of the unfunded portion in an amount
directly proportionate to the population of the
jurisdiction. Exhibit "A" provides an example of such a
scenario.
11728 Magnolia, Suite A * Riverside, CA 92503 * (714) 785-6081 · FAX: (714) 785-9651
June 22, 1990
Page 2
Section D (1) states that a City must execute the MOU within
thirty (30) days of the execution of the MOU by the County
in order for the Agreement to apply to the jurisdiction. If
a City fails to meet this deadline, no separate study for
that City shall be funded by the County. The Department
anticipates that the Board of Supervisors will execute the
MOU on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, thus you need to immediately
start scheduling this for your Council Agendas if you want
the study to cover your City.
The Waste Generation Study is the foundational step in the
Cities and County of Riverside meeting the State mandated
recycling goal of 25% of all solid waste diverted from the
landfill by January 1, 1995. The Department requests to hear
from your City concerning the MOU within the allotted thirty (30)
day time period.
If you have any questions regarding the Agreement or the
MOU, contact me or Michael Schier at (714) 785-6081.
Since,rely,
Robert A. Nelson
Director
GRA:mfa
Enclosure
cc:
Members of the Board of Supervisors
Gary Cottrell, CAO
Bob Jacobs, CH2M Hill
Les Cleveland, CVAG
Mischelle Zimmerman, WRCOG
George Larson, CIWMB
SUBMll"FAL TO TIlE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: Waste Management SUBMITTAL
SUBJECT: Agreement with CH2M HILL
performance of a waste generation
annual update' reports as mandated by
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1. Approve an Agreement between
DATE: June 26, 1990 ~~
, California, Inc. for ~ ',,'
study and four subsequent
state law.
the County, on behalf of
itself and for each of the incorporated cities of
Riverside County, and CH2M HILL, California, Inc.,
(using subconsultants Recovery Sciences Inc., and
Resource Integration Systems, LTD.) that commits
$294,000 of County funds for the performance of the
initial waste generation study and $373,000 over a four
year period for the four subsequent annual reports for
each agency as mandated by state law.
2. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
execute the Agreement on behalf of the County.
JUSTIFICATION: Assembly Bill 939 mandates that each City and
County complete a waste generation study to be included in the
required Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The waste
generation study is comprised of three components: a waste
characterization study, a waste diversion study and a waste
generation forecast. The waste characterization study will
detail information about the waste that is disposed in the
landfills. The waste diversion study will compile information
about the waste that is being diverted from the landfills. The
waste generation forecast will extrapolate the disposal and
diversion information over a fifteen year period for planning
purposes .... - . / (CONT'D)
R b A. Nels , Director
o err
RAN: mfa
Attachment
C.A.O. RECOMMENDATION
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Administrative Officer Signature
FORM IliRe'v 12/82)
Prev. Agn. ref. Depls. Comments Dist.
AGENDA NO.
Fll - Agreemenu with CH2M HILL
June 26, 1990
Page 2
Individual j~risdictions can complete the waste generation
study as a group as long as data gathered is specific to each
jurisdiction. The cooperative group effort was proposed as a
strategy to achieve economies of scale and consistency in
sampling efforts. The consultant chosen, was selected jointly
by representatives of the Cities and the County following
receipt of competitive proposals from five firms.
The consultant will also perform the four subsequent annual
update reports that are mandated by AB 939 for each
jurisdiction. The reports will determine progress made by each
jurisdiction in attaining the state mandated recycling goal of
25% of all solid waste diverted from the landfill by January 1,
1995.
FINANCIAL: Funds are available to meet the cost of the waste
generation study out of the $.50/ton recycling fees imposed
starting in January 1990, and will also be available for the
four annual updates out of the same Fund No. 140-41-931-2-
48613. A method for dividing the cost of any additional work
should it be necessary among the County and the Cities is a
part of the proposed Memorandum of Understanding between the
jurisdictions; this MOU is on the Board's calendar for
consideration this same date.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CONSULTANT SERVICE AGREEMENT
communities of Calimesa,
referred to as "COUNTY",
subconsultants Recovery
Systems, LTD), hereinafter
agree as follows:
1. PROJECT
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, on behalf of itself and for each of
the incorporated cities of Riverside County and the unincorporated
Canyon Lake and Jurupa, hereinafter
and CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC., (using
Sciences Inc., and Resource Integration
referred to as "CONSULTANT", hereby
The CONSULTANT shall perform for COUNTY a waste
characterization study, waste diversion study, waste
generation forecast and four subsequent annual update reports
pursuant to the final
Division 7, Chapter 9,
Planning Guidelines for
Emergency Regulations
California Code of
Preparing, Revising,
- Title 15,
Regulations-
and Amending
as they are
Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans
adopted by the California Integrated Waste Management Board.
The waste characterization, generation and diversion study
methodology shall be approved by the CIWMB.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall furnish tools, equipment, materials and
labor necessary to perform in a complete, skillful and
professional manner all those services specifically described
in Exhibit A (Scope of Work section of proposal tasks 1
through 8). COUNTY shall provide a work area at each
landfill targeted for sampling.
28
1
2
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
18
19
~0
21
22
E4
E6
28
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The CONSULTANT shall commence
forthwith upon the execution of
performance of service
this Agreement and shall
diligently perform the services to full completion and submit
to COUNTY the final report by February 1, 1991.
COMPENSATION
The total amount of compensation paid to the CONSULTANT under
this Agreement shall be a sum not to exceed $667,000 unless a
written amendment to this Agreement is executed by both
parties prior to performance of additional services. A
breakdown of these fees is presented in Exhibit B. The
compensation shall be payable in accordance with actual
quantities of work performed with respect to specific scope
of work
not be
regulatory agencies
CONSULTANT services.
PAYMENT
Compensation hereunder shall be
task in said Exhibit A.
due for CONSULTANT'S
which
Separate compensation will
meetings with COUNTY and/or
are necessary to complete
paid monthly in response to
invoices submitted by CONSULTANT detailing the work actually
performed against specific scope of work tasks set forth as a
portion of said Exhibit A. Payment shall be made within 30
days of receipt and approval by COUNTY of such invoices.
LICENSES
The CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, contractors and
subcontractors shall maintain professional licenses required
by the laws of the State of California at all times while
performing services under the Agreement.
-2-
1
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY
The COUNTY will provide any and all necessary permits and
rights of entry as required to perform the proposed services.
The CONSULTANT will prosecute the work in a manner to
minimize inconvenience and any possible hazard to any COUNTY
operation, and restore any work areas to their original
condition and former usefulness as soon as practicable. The
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the protection of public
and private property adjacent to or under the work area and
shall exercise due caution to avoid damage to such property.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT certifies that he is aware of the laws of the
State of California requiring employers to be insured against
liability for Worker's Compensation and shall comply with
such laws during the term of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT'S LIABILITY
CONSULTANT shall defend, save, indemnify and hold COUNTY, its
officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any
liability whatsoever, including wrongful death, based upon
any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, its employees,
contractors and agents to the proportionate extent, thereof,
arising out of, relating to or in any way connected with the
accomplishment of the work
this Agreement except for
the COUNTY, its officers,
the foregoing indemnity,
or performance of services under
such negligent act or omission of
employees or agents. As part of
CONSULTANT agrees to protect and
defend at his own expense, including attorney fees, COUNTY,
its officers, agents, and employees in any legal action based
upon any such acts or omissions, as stated hereinabove, by
CONSULTANT, its employees, contractors, or agents.
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
11.
12.
outlined in
failure of
compensated.
WORK PRODUCT
All reports and supplemental materials shall be and remain
the sole property of COUNTY.
TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either the CONSULTANT or
the COUNTY upon written notice to the other party in the
event of substantial failure of performance by the other
party. In the event the COUNTY is the party to terminate the
agreement and gives Notice of Termination, the COUNTY shall
make payment for all services performed to the date of
written notice that are in accordance with the Scope of
Services outlined in this Agreement. The payment shall be in
a total amount which bears the same ratio to the total
maximum fee otherwise payable under this Agreement as the
services actually performed bear to the total services
necessary for performance of this Agreement. All services
that are not in accordance with the scope of services
this Agreement and constitute a substantial
performance of those services will not be
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT and its agents, servants and employees shall act
at all times in an independent capacity during the term of
this Agreement and in the performance of the services to be
rendered hereunder, and shall not act as, and shall not be,
and shall not in any manner be considered to be, agents,
officers or employees of COUNTY.
-4-
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
ASSIGNMENT
Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof shall be assigned
by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of COUNTY.
NON-DISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT shall not discriminate in its recruiting, hiring,
promotion, demotion or termination practices on the basis of
race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry,
physical handicap, medical condition, marital status or sex
in the performance of this contract, and to the extent they
shall be found to be applicable hereto, shall comply with the
provisions of the California Fair Employment Practices Act
(commencing with Section 1410 of the Labor Code), and the
Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352).
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
11728 Magnolia Avenue, Suite A
Riverside, CA 92503
Dated:
CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC.
Dated:
R~ert A. N~~n, irect
L
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Attest:
GERALD A. MALONEY, Clerk of Board
By
Deputy
FORM APPROVED
Gerald J. Geerlin8 County Counsel
/
Deputy
-5-
By:
Res~,~ e~i~'O~ficer
SCOPE OF WORK
INTRODUCTION
On September 29, 1989, the Governor of California signed into law Assembly
Bill 939 (AB 939). This law established the California Integrated Waste
Management Board and made substantial changes in how cities will manage solid
waste in the State of California. Of major importance is the establishment of
ggressive solid waste diversion goals. By 1995, each city must divert 25 percent of
its waste stream from landfills. By the year 2000, 50 percent of the waste stream
must be diverted.
To ensure compliance with these diversion re.quirements, the law mandates that
each city prepare, adopt, and submit to the County and the state by July 1, 1991, a
source reduction and recycling plan. One element of this plan is a Waste
Generation Study. The study must quantify and characterize the waste that is being
generated, diverted, and disposed from these four separate types of generators:
residential, commercial, industrial, and others. The initial study must collect data
over a 6-month period, which will be eventually expanded to obtain data for a
12-month period to identify seasonal variations. A consistent methodology for
sampling, sorting, and classifylag waste must be used for all cities and unin-
corporated areas within the County.
It is important that this study be of sufficient accuracy to systematically characterize
the waste being generated, diverted, and disposed within each of the cities and in
the unincorporated areas of the County of Riverside. The data will be used to
develop a number of source reduction, recycling, and cornposting programs. If the
results of the generation study are not of sufficient accuracy to develop reasonable
programs that can be cost-effectively implemented, the cities and the County of
Riverside may not be able to comply with the requirements of AB 939 and may be
subject to daily fines from the California Integrated Waste Management Board until
compliance is achieved.
PROJECT TASKS
The major tasks that will be undertaken for this study will include the following.'.
2.
3.
4.
Introductory meeting
Review of previous studies
A waste composition study
A waste diversion study
1-1
LAO345.37~175_002.51
EXHIBIT "A"
A waste generation forecast
Draft and final report
Project coordination
Subsequent tasks that may be undertaken at tile discretion of the cities and county
include:
8. An annual update report
Preparation of a Source Reduction and Recycling Plan in accordance
with AB 939
10. Continuing assistance in plan implementation
A description of tile methodology that will be used to complete these tasks is
presented below. The methodology that will be used will be the same regardless if
the consultant is selected to perform the eastern, western, or both portions of
Riverside County.
TASK l--INTRODUCTORY MEETING
This task will be carried out immediately after the County issues a Notice to
Proceed. The objectives are to meet with City and County staff and other
interested parties to review the overall intent of the study; to verify the needs and
expectations of the cities and. County; and to review the methodology, approach,
and Iogistics to be used. Modifications to the Scope of Work will be made as
needed.
TASK 2--REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES
A thorough characterization of solid waste entails tile investigation of changes in
waste stream quantities and composition over time. The team will review all
relevant waste characterization studies performed in the region. The results of the
previous studies will be tabulated, presented, and compared with the most recently
acquired data. Comparative analyses will be made and the possibility of combining
data in a statistical model will be explored.
TASK 3--SOLID WASTE COMPOSITION STUDY
AB 939 requires that each city and all unincorporated areas conduct an analysis of
the composition of the solid waste currently being disposed. It is essential that this
analysis be carefully conducted to obtain statistically reliable results. The results of
this analysis will be the basis for selecting and designin. g specific source reduction
and recycling programs. An inaccurate waste generation analysis could result in the
1-2
LAO345.37M 75_002.5 !
selection of programs that would not optimize waste diversion rates. resulting in
potentially significantly higher costs to tile city and the possibility of not meeting the
waste diversion goals mandated by AB 939.
The methodology proposed for the County of Riverside project is based on exten-
sive research and application by the project team over the past 3 years, on state-of-
the-art statistical analysis, and our extensive knowledge of local waste generation
patterns. Studies were recently conducted in Long Beach, San Diego, and Berkeley
using the methodology that has been developed by the project team resulting in a
high level of accuracy with a minimum of sampling. The methodology that will be
used for this task is described below.
3.1 Initial Sampling Design
The initial sampling design will involve tile following steps:
Research waste distribution patterns, land use patterns, and local
demographics
Review collection routes and methods for collecting waste from
residential, commercial, industrial, and other uses
Determine tile amount of waste disposed for each city and
unincorporated area through interviews with private and public
haulers. Veril~ data through a review of waste disposal data at
land fills
Visit potential sites for conducting sampling study and select the most
appropriate site(s)
Select sampling strata (residential, commercial, industrial, and other)
Determine categories of waste to be characterized based on types of
wastes to be targeted for diversion
Determine seasons for east and west portions of the county for which
the characterization study will be conducted
Determine initial sampling allocation and select the number of trucks
to be sampled for each City and unincorporated areas by strata based
on estimated variability within each stratum
Estimate the number of samples per truck based on the estimated
variability within each stratum
1-3
LAO345.37x. 175_OO2.51
3.2 Initial Sampling Field Work
The initial Sampling field work will involve the following steps:
· Select sampling components
· Select sampling dates
· Train sampling crew
· Deliver sampling equipment to site and set up site
· Contact City/County staff for diversion
sampling site
· Collect initial samples
3.3 Main Sampling Design
The main sampling design will involve the following steps:
of specific loads to the
Analyze the results of the initial samples to determine the variability
of the samples for each strata
Determine the final number of samples required to obtain statistically
valid results
Select sample components for main sampling field work
3.4 Main Sampling Field Work
TIle main sampling design will involve tile lollowing steps:
· Select sampling dates
· Contact City/County staff for diversion of specific loads to the
sampling site
Conduct waste sampling
Compile and analyze data
To minimize cost and expedite the study, it is assumed that the sampling will be
done at one location in the western portion of Riverside County and at another
LAO345.37Ni 75_002.5 1
1-4
location in the eastern portion of the County (if selected to do both studies). Each
City and unincorporated -~rea will be contacted and requested to deliver certain
types of loads (residential, commercial, industrial, other) to the sampling site. The
Project Team will be responsible for determining the loads that will be delivered to
ensure that the loads are representative of that sub-wasteshed. Loads will be
selected in a random and unbiased manner. Two separate periods will be selected
for conducting the main sampling field work in order to obtain seasonality
information of the waste stream.
Based on our previous experience and estimated daily tonnages (1,600 tpd and
3,800 tpd for the eastern and western portions of the county respectively),
approximate 192 samples will be required for the eastern portion of the County and
354 samples for the Western portion of the county for each of the initial sampling
and the main sampling field work. The actual number of samples that will be
required to obtain statistically reliable results, however, cannot be determined until
after the initial design stage when the variability of the loads are determined. (If
loads are highly variable, a larger number of samples are required to obtain
statistically reliable results than would be the case if loads did not vary significantly.)
A more detailed description of the procedure that will be used to conduct this
analysis is presented in Appendix B.
FASK 4--WASTE DIVERSION STUDY
It is important that tile existing diversion rate be identified to help tile cities and the
County meet the requirements of AB 939. Existing diversion rates will be estimated
through contacts with various agencies and businesses in the area including tile
following:
Local market outlets that deliver secondary materials recovered from
the transfer stations and/or drop-off centers
Local recycling firms and secondary materials handlers in or adjacent
to the County to obtain estimates on the amount and type of
recyclables they currently receive from residents and businesses in the
County
End users in the area to determine if they have any clients in the
County from which they routinely accept recyclable materials
The surveys will be conducted with the assistance of a Certified Public Accounting
(CPA) firm. The accounting firm will assure confidential responses by compiling
the data and providing aggregate totals. Information obtained from end users will
be used to confirm the results of the survey and provide data that can be used to
LAO345.37M 75_002.51
1-5
revise total tonnage figures for several commodities. The revised figures resulting
from these market contacts will be used to determine the overall recovery rate for
each City and unincorporated areas of the County.
TASK 5--WASTE GENERATION FORECAST
Total baseline waste generation will be determined by adding waste disposal
quantities determined in Task 3 and waste diversion quantities determined in
Task 4. A waste generation forecast will be made for the planning period based on
population projections identified in the County of Riverside Solid Waste
'~anagement Plan and other available planning information on projected number of
ousinesses, industries and other types of developments.
TASK 6--FINAL REPORT
A final report will be prepared. The report will be divided into sections so .that
each jurisdiction can include the results of the study directly into their Source
Reduction and Recycling Plan. A description of the methodology that was used
during the study will also be included. One hundred copies of the final report will
be delivered to .the County for distribution.
TASK 7--PROJECT COORDINATION
It is important that the study be closely coordinated with the County and the cities
to ensure that the project is completed on time and statistically valid results are
obtained. During the initial meeting, the Consultant will explain in detail the
methodology that will be used during this study. Cities will be contacted directly to
ensure that the specified loads are delivered on schedule to the sampling locations.
Representatives of the cities and County will be invited to inspect the sampling
operations in order to educate them of the procedures used and to promote confi-
dence in the results. In addition, monthly progress reports will be submitted to the
individual jurisdictions indicating work completed to date and planned activities for
the coming month. The status of the work in relationship to the project schedule
will also be identified.
1-6
LAO345.37~175_002.51
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TASKS
The following additional tasks can be performed by the consultant team at the
request of tile County or any city:
TASK 8--ANNUAL REPORT
If requested by the County, an annual report will be prepared in accordance with
Section 18771 of the Emergency Regulations. The annual report will describe
changes in the types and quantities of waste generated in each jurisdiction. The
information generated for this report will be obtained from waste quantity infor-
mation recorded at the disposal sites, additional field sampling to determine waste
composition, and a diversion study. Procedures similar to those described in
Tasks 3 and 4 will be used. Any significant differences in waste quantities and
composition from previous studies will be identified.
EXHIBIT B
Riverside County Cost Estimate
Waste Generation Study
Initial Sample
Design
Field Work
Statistical Analysis
$ 50,000
32,000
10,000
Main Sample (1st Season)
Design
Field Work
Statistical Analysis
18,000
32,000
13,000
Main Sample (2nd Season)
Design
Field Work
Statistical Analysis
7,000
32,000
13,000
Other
Waste Diversion Study
Report
Expenses
Coordination/
Administration/Review
24,000
15,000
10,000
38,000
Subtotal
Annual Update Reports
1st Annual Update Report (1991)
2nd Annual Update Report (1992)
3rd Annual Update Report (1993)
4th Annual Update Report (1994)
Subtotal
294,000
87,000
90,000
95,000
101,000
373,000
Total $667,000
5tlBMI I'I At. '1 (3 '[I IE BOAHD OF 5tJPkil{VI5Ol{5
Ct)UNr¥ OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Waste Management
FROM: 5LJBMITfALDATE: June 26, 1990
SUBJECT:
Memorandum of Understanding between Riverside County and the
incorporated Cities of the County for completion of a waste
generation study mandated by state law, and reduction of tipping
fees for selected loads to be diverted for investigation.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1. Approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding with all
Cities in the County·
Authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct
the Director of the Waste Management Department to forward
copies of the agreement to the individual Cities for
execution·
Authorize the Director of Waste Management to:
direct commercial haulers whose loads have been selected by
the Department's consultant (for waste stream sampling) to
deliver these loads to centralized landfill sorting
facilities.
reduce by 50% the tipping fees for loads diverted from their
normal landfill delivery point to regional waste stream
sampling points providing, however, if any loads are diverted
from Blythe to the regional sampling point in the Coachella
Valley these loads shall have the entire tipping fee waived
and a comparable amount be reimbursed by the Department to
the affected hauler for his diverted loads. (CONT'D)
C.A.O. RECOMMENDATION:
b r A ~ N~I rec~o~
o e ~ . eiso' Di
FINANCIA MPA~:
Admini,,lrallve Officer 51gnalure
Prey. Ag,. ref.
[)epli. Cumn~ent~
Dlbl.
AGENDAf
FORM I|,Hev IJ,Is~l
Fll - MOU Between Riverside County and the Incorporated Cities
June 26, 1990
Page 2
JUSTIFICATION:- Assembly Bill 939 mandates that each City and County
complete a waste generation study to be included in the required
Source Reduction and Recycling Element. Individual jurisdictions
can complete the study as a group as long as data gathered is
specific to each jurisdiction. The cooperative group effort was
proposed as a strategy to achieve economies of scale and consistency
in sampling reports. The consultant chosen, was selected jointly
by representatives of the Cities and the County following receipt of
competitive proposals from five firms.
In order to keep the costs of the study down, the consultant
proposed diverting some refuse haulers' trucks from their usual
landfill destination to one central landfill for the eastern County
and one central landfill for the western County. The effectiveness
of this strategy relies upon the cooperation of the individual
haulers. This method creates an inconvenience for some haulers who
would be traveling a longer distance to the centralized landfill.
The installation of a reduced tipping fee for impacted loads would
provide a form of compensation for this inconvenience and incentive
for cooperative participation in the study.
FINANCIAL: The reduced tipping fee is estimated to cost the County
$15,000 tO $20,000 for the lost revenue being waived by the
recommended authorization. Sufficient funds are available in the
various impacted accounts to absorb this loss of revenues.
RAN:mfa
Attachment
cc: CAO
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING-BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND
THE CITIES OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TBIS MF/4ORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is entered into this
day of , 1990, by and
between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County") and the Cities
(the "Cities") whose signatures are affixed hereto with reference
to the following:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, The California State
Bill ("AB") 939 into law; and
Legislature has passed Assembly
WHEREAS, said bill, AB 939, mandates each City and County within
the State of California to complete waste characterization
studies for inclusion in the source reduction and recycling
elements; and
WHEREAS, a single waste characterization study ("the study") can
be completed by more than one public entity and still contain the
necessary information for each separate entity as mandated by AB
939;
WT]EREAS, the County and the Cities desire to cooperate together
in a joint study in order to meet the study requirements for each
separate entity;
NOW, TBEREFORE, the parties do hereby mutually express,
the other, to agree to the following:
each to
1. AGREEMENTS.
A. COOPERATION
The County and the Cities agree to cooperate in good
faith with each other throughout the duration of the study. The
County and Cities also agree to cooperate in good faith with the
waste generation consultant and to supply all available
information requested by consultant.
B. PAYMENT
(1) The County will pay for the entire initial waste
generation study and will also pay for the cost of the four
annual updates out of the recycling fund portion of the landfill
tipping fee.
(2) If additional work is contracted for by the County
to cover extra woTk not heretofore contemplated which is agreed
to be done as part of this contract by all cities, each City
shall pay a share of the unfunded portion in an amount directly
proportionate to the population of the individual jurisdiction as
shown in concept on Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
C. TERM
The initial waste generation study shull cover al~
estimated 8 month time period. Four annual updates shall
thereafter also be completed under the terms of this agreement.
D. TEI~MINATION
(1) This agreement shall not apply to any City which
elects not to execute the MOU within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the MOU by the County, and no separate study funded
by the County shall be made for that City.
(2) Termination of this Agreement by any of the Cities
shall be preceded by forwarding written notice of intent to
terminate to the County thirty (30) days prior to the anticipated
termination date.
(3) The terminating party will be required to meet all
financial and nonfinancial responsibilities accrued up to and
including the effective termination date.
(4) The County reserves the right to terminate this
agreement at any time prior to completion of the services to be
furnished by its consultant, if for any reason consultant is
unable to perform the work herein contemplated. Prior to
termination, the County shall notify all Cities in writing and
immediately sponsor a coordination meeting with all affected
agencies in which the parties shall formulate a plan of action to
complete the study.
2. DEFINITIONS.
The following
as follows:
terms when used in this MOU shall be defined
1.1 "County" means the County of
subdivision of the State of California.
Riverside,
a political
1.2 "Cities" means those incorporated areas that are within
the political subdivision that is the County of Riverside and are
parties to this Agreement. These cities include Banning,
Beaumont, Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Corona, Desert Hot
Springs, Hemet, Indian Wells, Indio, Lake Elsinore, La Quinta,
Moreno Valley, Norco, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Perris, Rancho
Mirage, Riverside, San Jacinto, and Temecula; and the presently
unincorporated areas of Calimesa, Canyon Lake and Jurupa which
are also pursuing Cityhood status.
1.3 "AB 939" means Assembly Bill
Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of
the Government Code.
939 -- The California
1989, chapter 1095 of
1.4 "Waste Characterization Study" shall mean that study
required by Assembly Bill 939 and described in detail by the
Integrated Waste Management Board Emergency Regulations dated
June, 1990 sections 18722, 18724, 18726 and appendix 1.
1.5 "Total Population" means the total amount of persons
residing within the political boundaries of said entity.
IN WITNESS Wt~EREOF, the
Memorandum of Understanding on
written.
parties have
the day and year
executed this
first above
ATTEST:
GEI~3~LD A. MALONEY, CLERK
BY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
By:
CITIES
By:
(Continue with all
participating Cities signing)
EXHIBIT A
Example of Additional Work (Assuming $75,000) Cost
Jurisdiction
Unicorporated County
Banning
Beaumont
Blythe
Calimesa (*)
Canyon Lake (*)
Cathedral City
Coachella
Corona
Desert Hot Springs
Hemet
Indian Wells
Indio
Jurupa (*)
Lake Elsinore
La Quinta
Moreno Valley
Norco
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Perris
Rancho Mirage
Riverside
San Jacinto
Temecula(* *)
Total
Approximate
Population
277,550
20,950
9,750
8,400
8,000
9,600
31,750
14,950
70 000
11 200
35.650
2 700
36 000
70 000
15 950
11 850
114 900
25 350
20 650
32 100
18 900
9 250
218.500
15 300
20,450
1,109,700
Jurisdictions'
% of Total Proportionate
Pop. Share
25.01% 18,758.45
1.89% 1,415.92
0.88% 658.96
0.76% 567.72
0.72% 540.69
0.87% 648.82
2.86% 2,145.85
1.35% 1,010.41
6.31% 4,731.01
1.01 % 756.96
3.21% 2,409.43
0.24% 182.48
3.24% 2,433.09
6.31% 4,731.01
1.44% 1,077.99
1.07% 800.89
10.35% 7,765.61
2.28% 1,713.30
1.86% 1,395.65
2.89% 2,169.51
1.70% 1,277.37
0.83% 625.17
19.69% 14,767.50
1.38% 1,034.06
1.84% 1,382.13
100% $75,000.00
* Assuming Incorporation measure passes in November 1990.
Source for population figures: LAFCO
* *Source: Riverside County Planning Department, Building Permit
Activity Report, Jan. 1990
Population Source: D.O.F., Jan. 1990, the three LAFCO figures have
already been subtracted from the Unincorporated figure.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A GENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
. A REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1990
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two
(2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed
on the Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed
with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
MANAGERS REPORT
DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting:
October 9, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
2\csdagende\09259,O - 1 - 09/20190