HomeMy WebLinkAbout100290 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER
OCTOBER 2, 1990- 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 90-17
Resolution: No. 90-102
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Pastor George Simmons
Temecula Valley House of Praise
Mayor Parks
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
Swearing in of Parks and Recreation Commission
Swearing in of Public Safety Commission
Swearing in of Traffic Commission
Proclamation - "Great Temecula Tractor Race
Weekend"
Introduction of Mark Brodowski, Battalion Chief,
Riverside County Fire Department
PUBLIC FORUM
During the first meeting of each month, the City Council of the City of
Temecula will devote a period of time (not to exceed 45 minutes) for the
purpose of allowing the public to discuss topics of interest with the Council.
The members of the City Council will respond to questions and may give
direction to City staff. The Council is prohibited, by the provisions of the
Brown Act, from taking any official action on any matter which is not on the
agenda. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
City Clerk.
2/egenda/100290 1 09128/90
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all
will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and
resolutions included in the agenda.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 18, 1990, as mailed.
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 24, 1990, as mailed.
3
Application for ABC License - Denny's Restaurant
Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for restaurant located at 28915
Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file.
2legends/100290 2 08128/~0
4
Amendment to 3-Year Cool;)erative Agreements with County of Riverside CDBG
Program
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the Amendment.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
5 Pilot Transit Program Within the City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter of support to be
signed by the Mayor and the members of the City Council and to
enter into an agreement, subject to approval of the City Attorney,
to serve as sponsor for the applicant Thomas Mindiola.
6 Consideration of 1990-91 Budget Reouests for Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Direct the City Manager to review all existing requests for funding
and make recommendations to the City Council.
or
6.2
Appoint an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of two members of the
City Council to work with the City Manager to review all existing
requests for funding and make recommendations.
21agendd100290 3 09/28/90
7
Request for Funding Mrs. Temecula (Mrs. California/America Pageant).
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Direct City Staff to include as a 1990-91 funding request if
Council so desires.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: October 9, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2legendl/100290 4 09128/80
PR OCLAMA TION
A PROCLA34ATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has enjoyed the uniquely local event call the "Great
Temecula Tractor Race" for the past 13 years; and
WHEREAS, the Temecula Town Association has sponsored this event for the enjoyment
of the citizens of Temecula and to the benefit of all segments of business community in the
Temecula Valley; and
WHEREAS, all proceeds from this event have been donated by the Temecula Town
Association to benefit the community, including the construction of the Temecula Community
Center, and
WHEREAS, the Temecula Town Association has been working diligently for many
months to advertise and prepare for the 14th Annual Great Temecula Tractor Race to be held
October 5th, 6th and 7th, 1990 to be held at the Tractor Race Grounds north of Rancho
California Road and Diaz Road,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald J. Parks, Mayor of the City of Temecula, hereby
proclaim October 5th through 7th as
GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE DAYS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Ternecula to be affixed this 2nd day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks
Mayor
June S. Greek
Deputy City Clerk
ITEM NO.
1
ITEM NO. 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
7:05 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California.
Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Betsy Hanna, and
Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Roger Sowder, Oak Springs Prebyterian.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Moore.
PRESENTATIONS/
PRO CLA MA TIONS
Councilmember Birdsall presented the members of the City Seal Committee with a
certificate of appreciate for their work in putting together the Temecula City Seal.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Dedovesch, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, asked what is being done to enforce code
violations, such as balloons. He also asked that the problem of speeding on Temecula
Roads be addressed, stating it is unsafe to drive on the major roads in Temecula. He
stated that cars with "For Sale" signs are still being parked along roadways which is
an eyesore to this community.
Jeri Witt, 30321 Tradewater Court, asked that an ordinance be adopted restricting the
size of commercial vehicles on residential streets. She provided the City Council with
model ordinances from other cities on this subject.
Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos Court, stated he felt the City Council does not always
act in the best interest of the people. He said high density housing is still be
Hinutes\8\18\90 -1- 09/2~/90
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1990
approved. He stated additional assessments are being levied against the people
without solving the problems. He asked why the Council is not allowed to respond
to questions posed by citizens during the public comment section of the meeting and
suggested holding a town meeting where these questions could be answered. He also
asked that priority be given on City jobs to Temecula residents.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated that with respect to a ordinance restricting commercial
vehicles on residential streets, he spoke with Captain Sayre on this subject and the
City will see something on this in the near future.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Lindemans requested the removal of Items 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 12 and
13.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Items 6, 8 and 9.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve Consent Calendar Items 1, 2, 5 and 14 as follows:
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 14, 1990 as mailed.
2.2 Approve the minutes of August 21, 1990 as mailed.
2.3 Approve the minutes of August 28, 1990 as mailed.
2.4 Approve the minutes of August 31, 1990 as mailed.
2.5 Approve the minutes of September 4, 1990 as corrected.
5. Application for ABC License - Harold's Restaurant
5.1 Receive and file.
Hinutes\8\18\90 -2- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
14.
City Treasurer's Report for the Month Ending July 31,
14.1 Receive and file.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Resolution Approving Payment of Demands
1990
Lindemans, Moore,
Councilmember Lindemans questioned the one month telephone bill for the City
of Temecula of $6,076.58.
City Manager Dixon explained that $3,987 of the total is for phone service for
Willdan and Associates, which the City will be reimbursed for. The actual cost
for the City is $2,483.00.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
ABSENT:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Ninutes\8\18\~O -3- 0~/24/~0
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
Second Reading of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement - Rancho
Core Associates
Councilmember Lindemans stated he would vote no on this item as it states the
City is proceeding with a General Plan, when in fact this process has not yet
begun.
Larry Lefler, 23767 Via De Gema Linda, Murrieta, stated he is the Managing
Partner of the property contiguous to this project and questioned the plans in
the agreement to allow an open lot for the Western Corridor. He asked that the
two properties cooperate and realign this road to be acceptable to both
developments. He presented a copy of this plan to staff for further review.
City Attorney Hanna stated this agreement provides language that can
accommodate this change.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall
to read by title only and approve an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPRO VING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-01
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Plot Plan No. 86
Councilmember Mu~oz objected to an exception to the tower moratorium to
build a 60 foot tower in a residential area and asked the reasoning behind
staff's recommendation.
Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, stated this was heard before the Temecula
Planning Commission on August 20, 1990. He reported the request, by Inland
Valley Cablevision, is to construct a tower to replace the existing outdated
Minutes\8\18\90 -4- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
facility. He explained that most of the tower would be obscured and the
Planning Commission recommended the City Council grant an exemption.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked why the Council would consider a tower in a
residential area when not permitted in commercial zones. He said this action
will set a precedent for granting exemptions for any reason.
Mayor Parks asked if this new tower will give the residents of Temecula
improved cable service?
Jerry Sanders, representing Inland Cablevision, 2770 West Devonshire, Hemet,
stated the existing facility has been in place since 1972 and is very outdated.
He said the new tower would greatly improve the quality of service to the
citizens of Temecula. He stated every effort is being made to make this facility
blend into the surrounding area and meets the conditions of approval set by the
Planning Commission.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked how much of this tower would be visible to the
public. Mr. Thornhill stated approximately 30 feet.
John Cloughen, 41304 Bravos Court said he is a resident of the Ridgeview
Tract and this will be visible from his home. He stated he is against this tower
and believes it will be much more visible than the existing facility.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to approve Plot Plan No. 86.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated the Council needs more public input on this issue
and requested this item not be approved.
Councilmember Birdsall said this facility has been in place for 20 years without
any complaints. She stated a public hearing has been held and this new tower
will benefit all the citizens of Temecula by improved cable service.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes\8\18\90 -5- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
7. Parcel Map No. 19582
Councilmember Lindemans stated he will vote no on this issue. He said this in
the same area where 135 single lots for Johnson + Johnson were just
approved. He stated another 55 single lots in this location would severely
impact traffic.
Councilmember Mu~oz said since this is an item that the Council does not have
control over because it was approved by Riverside County prior to City
incorporation, he would vote yes.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to
receive and file Parcel Map No. 19582.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSENT: 0
RECESS
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
Lindemans
None
Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:05 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
CSD Meeting at 9:35 PM.
e
Plot Plan No. 11604
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the 258 parking spaces proposed would be
required on this project.
Gary Thornhill reported the parking plan is an exhibit which must be followed.
Ninutes\8\18\~0 -6- 0~/24/~0
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
10.
It was moved
Mu~oz to receive and file Plot Plan No. 11604.
by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
The motion was carried by the following vote:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
AYES:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26036
Councilmember Mu~oz asked what has changed on this project to cause the
applicant's request for subdivision?
Gary Thornhill stated originally this property consisted of two parcels, however
it was merged into one. The owners decided this was not in their best interest
and are requesting it be subdivided again. He said this could be due to
financing concerns.
Councilmember Mu~oz moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to receive and file Tentative Parcel Map No. 26036.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Tentative Tract Map No. 23990
Councilmember Lindemans asked if the developer is aware of the additional
conditions of approval presented to Council tonight.
Gary Thornhill stated these are standard conditions of approval and the
applicant is aware and has agreed to them.
Ni~tes\8\18\90 -7- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
City Manager Dixon said the new conditions need to made a part of the motion.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to receive and file Tentative Tract Map No. 23990 subject to the following
changes:
The Planning Department Changes:
1. Amend Condition No. 20 with the following:
Fire Mitigation
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with
the Riverside County Fire Department a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit
as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
2. Add Condition No. 58
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay to the City
Regional Statistical Area No. 49 (RSA) fees, pursuant to Development
Mitigation Fee Ordinance No. 659.
3. Add Condition No. 59
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV
standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
4. Add Condition No. 15.k.
Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay applicable
Quimby Fees pursuant to Ordinance No. 460.
And Engineering Change as follows:
Prior to Occupancy:
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project,
in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
Ninutes\8\18\~ -8- 09/2~/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
public facility mitigation fee or district has not bee finally established by the
date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any
phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of
Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer.
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees
in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
11. Find Tract Map Nos 229 16-1, -2, -3 and F
Councilmember Lindemans asked if the Quimby provisions are being imposed?
Gary Thornhill stated the City can exact these fees under the terms of the
Development Agreement.
City Attorney Hanna stated the Quimby Ordinance will apply under Page 11,
Section D.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans seconded by Councilmember
Birdsall to approve Final Tract Map Nos. 22916-1, -2, -3 and Final, subject to
the conditions of approval, as amended.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Ninutes\8\18\~ -9- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
12.
13.
Final Tract Map No. 23101-2
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to approve Final Tract Map No. 23101-2, subject to the conditions of approval.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Public Document - City's Annual Operating Budget FY 1990-91
Councilmember Lindemans noted that the actual surplus is now much great
than 1.3 million dollars.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Mu~oz to receive and file Public Document - City's Annual Operating Budget FY
1990-91.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. City Seal Selection
Councilmember Birdsall reported there are several actions to be taken tonight.
One is to select the Official City Flower, approve the recommendation for the
City Slogan, and select (by ballot) an Official City Seal (Logo). She said the
recommendation for the City Flower is The Temecula Rose. The
Ni~tes\8\18\~ -10- . 09/2~/90
City Council Minutes' September 18, 1990
recommendation for the City Slogan, "Old Traditions · New Opportunities",
was derived from a Chamber of Commerce contest. She said the logo would
be chosen from six choices put together by the committee. She said the
audience has been polled for their choice, and the Council will make the final
choice.
Steve Sander, 40213 Holden Circle, agreed the City Flower should be a rose.
He said there is a registered rose currently named "Rancho California Rose",
and the Rose Society has applied to have it renamed the "Temecula Rose".
Karen Ortega, 30054 Mira Loma Drive, stated she placed roses on the podium
t o demonstrate the rose is a perfect symbol for this community. She asked
that the Rose Society be allowed to plant the median on Rancho California
Road with roses to further beautify the City entrance. Ms. Ortega said she
would like the freeway signs at each end of the City to be changed to bear the
symbol of the rose.
Councilmember Moore asked if the City is requesting a rose to be the official
flower, or a specific rose, such as the "Temecula Rose".
Councilmember Birdsall said this name is presently being applied for.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to approve the "Rancho California Rose" as the official City flower and that the
name by changed to the "Temecula Rose" as soon as possible.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
-11- 09/2~/90
Hinutes\8\18\~O
' City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Mu~oz to accept the recommended slogan "Old Traditions New Opportunities"
as the Official City Slogan.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Parks stated it is important that this slogan came from the youth of this
community, inspiring future leaders.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mu~oz seconded a motion
to chose Design No. 6 as the Official Seal for the City of Temecula.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans seconded by Councilmember
Moore to direct staff to have camera ready art prepared for future use as
appropriate.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Ninutes\8\18\90 -12- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
16. Designation of Voting Delegate for Leaque of California Cities Annual
Conference
City Manager Dixon stated the League of California Cities will be acting on a
number of items before the general membership. The League has asked each
City to designate a delegate. Mr. Dixon said an alternate can also be chose if
the Council so desires.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mu~oz seconded a motion
to appoint Mayor Parks to serve as delegate and Councilmember Birdsall to
serve 8s 81ternate.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
17. Acquisition of Park Lands
City Manager Dixon recommended staff pursue acquisition of property offered
by Bedford Properties. He also stated that Metropolitan Water District does
have right-of-way for their pipelines on this property.
Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9:15 PM. The meeting
was reconvened at 9:17 PM.
Joe Pribanic, 30929 Calle Pina Colada, stated he is in opposition of the City
acquiring this property for use as a public park. He said the topography of this
land does not lend itself to a park. He stated property owners have had trouble
with drugs and vandalism in this area and the strip of land would be virtually
impossible to patrol. He asked that the Council not accept this property.
John Cloughen, 41304 Bravos Court, Secretary/Treasurer of the Ridgeview
Homeowners Association, stated the homeowners are opposed to this property
being used as a City park. He advised the City Council that the Ridgeview
Homeowners Association has been offered this property by Bedford Properties
for development of a tree farm for a joint venture with La Serena Home Owners
Association.
Hinutes\8\18\~) -1]- 0~/2~/~0
- City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
James Donart, 41300 Bravos Court, said this property must have a road
maintained down the center for access by the Metropolitan Water District. He
also stated that due to the configuration of this land, it is very difficult to
supervise and asked that the City Council not acquire this land for use as a
park.
Jim Williams, 27425 Ynez Road, stated he seconded everything that has been
said before him.
Terry Cordell, 41284 Bravos Court, objected to public use of this property
stating it cannot be supervised and he has had problems in the past with
vandalism.
Kim Muscato, 41365 Bravos Court, stated she is also in opposition to this land
becoming a City Park.
Karin Pavlovsky, 30911 White Rocks, President of the Ridgeview Homeowners
Association, stated the association has voted to support the cooperative
development of this site as a tree farm. She stated the association is in
opposition to staff's proposal. She also said it would not be appropriate for
Bedford to receive credit for a park for this unusable property.
Councilmember Birdsall asked if a representative of the La Serena Homeowners
Association is present. Mr. Cloughen said that there is not a representative
tonight, but he met with the association and they favor the joint venture for a
tree farm.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested the City acquire this land and lease it back
to the homeowners association at a nominal fee. This would enable the City
to obtain open space which is needed also. By doing this it would serve both
needs.
Councilmember Lindemans said the City is in desperate need of parks but
stated the City needs to purchase usable land.
Councilmember Moore expressed the desire to use this land for possible
walking and bike trails or a skate board park.
Mayor Parks said that he understands this site has been used for many years
been a nuisance to the surrounding property owners and stated he felt it would
be better to allow the homeowners association to have this particular piece of
land.
Hinutes\8\18\90 -14- 09/2~/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to direct staff to pursue acquisition of the property offered by Bedford
Properties with the provision that the City will enter into negotiations to sub-
lease the property to the Ridgeview Homeowners Association for an undefined
period of time.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz
NOES: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Parks asked that the Council reorder the agenda and that Item No. 18 be
considered last.
19. Buildin~l and Safety and Community Services DezTartment Positions
City Manager Dixon stated this action will approve positions and salaries for the
titles previously approved by Council in the budget. He said that positions
within the Building and Safety and Community Services Departments could
then be filled. He stated this needs to be acted upon quickly as the new
Building and Safety Director will start work Monday, September 24, 1990 and
will need to begin hiring staff.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to
adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL POLICIES
and authorize the City Manager to fill Building and Safety and Community
Services Department positions as recommended in the staff report.
Minutes\8\18\90 -15- . 09/24/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
Moore,
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
20. Schedule Swearing In Ceremonies for Commission
City Manager Dixon recommended setting the date for the swearing-in
ceremonies for commissions on Tuesday, October 2, 1990 at the beginning of
the Council meeting.
Council so directed staff to schedule the ceremonies on October 2, 1990.
21. Lease of City Hall Office Space at 43172 Business Park Drive
City Manager Dixon stated he would have preferred a contract for less than
three years, however the property can be subleased if the City desired to move
to another location.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to authorize the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with Windsor
Properties subject to City Attorney approval.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
22. Riverside County Chapter of the League of California Cities
Councilmember Birdsall said she requested this be placed on the agenda. She
said that this would enable Riverside County to have more of a voice in the
decision made at the League of California Cities. She said approval by the City
Minutes\8\18\90 -16- 09/24/90
City Council Minutes
September 18, 1990
18.
has been requested prior to the general meeting of the League in Anaheim on
October 21, 1990.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to
authorize the Mayor to advise the League of California Cities that the City of
Temecula favors the creation of a Riverside County Chapter of the League of
California Cities.
The motion was carried by the following .vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Scheduling of Meetings and Study Sessions
City Manager Dixon stated it was Council's desire that this matter be agendized
for discussion. He said that in August the meetings were adjusted to have two
regular meetings and two study session. He said there has been some
frustration by Council that no action could be taken at study sessions, and it
was suggested to have regular meetings once a week.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested looking forward to the holidays and
determining the dates a Council Meeting will not be held such as the Tuesday
preceding Thanksgiving and Christmas Day and New Year's Day. She asked
that the Community Center be given sufficient notice to schedule other events
if desired.
City Manager Dixon suggested not having such a full agenda on the first and
third week, so more discussions could take place.
Councilmember Birdsall requested meetings be designed that could include
questions and answers from the public. City Manager Dixon stated this could
be included on the agenda perhaps on the first week of the month.
Mayor Parks stated he felt the Council needs to set some time aside for
developing good working relationships between members of the Council. He
said he would like to see the group pull together.
Ninutes\8\18\90 -17- 09/24/90
-- City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
City Manager Dixon said a team building session would be beneficial utilizing
an outside facilitator. He said he would like to set this up during the month of
October.
The Council directed staff to schedule adjourned regular meetings on the first,
third and fifth Tuesdays of each month to include a study session format and
allow for conduct of some business items as staff deems necessary.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon stated RFQ's have been sent out for the general plan. He
requested a committee be set up including members of the Planning Commission and
the City Council to interview four or five consultants.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Lindemans requested the staff look into using the City's passenger
van to transport workers for general City clean-up projects.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the City Attorney to look into an ordinance giving
the City's Code Enforcement Officer citation authority.
Mayor Parks requested that the City Attorney's office complete their investigation,
regarding the allegations of improper use of influence, as soon as possible and issue
their report.
Ninutes\8\18\90 -18- 09/2~/90
City Council Minutes September 18, 1990
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
adjourn at 10:20 PM to a meeting on September 24, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Hinutes\8\18\90 -19- 09~24~90
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
7:00 PM in the Temecula City Hall Conference Room, 43172 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California. Mayor Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Munoz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present was Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None offered.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Interview Candidates for Traffic Commission
Mayor Parks briefly explained the questions suggested to be posed as standard
ones to all the applicants and asked that the members of the City Council keep
their questions consistent for all of the candidates.
The candidates were interviewed at fifteen minute intervals in the following
order:
Bill Keller
Jerry Godnick
Ron Guerriero
Bob Harmon
Ron Roberts
Dave Lander
Randy Luth
Steve Sander
Robert Walker
Knox Johnson
Minutes\9\24\90 - 1 - 09/25/90
City Council Minutes September 24, 1990
Conduct Ballot Counting Procedure
Appoint Members of the Temecula Traffic Commission
At the completion of the interviews the City Council made a first selection of
the candidates by ballot.
Ron Roberrs received five votes on the first ballot and was unanimously
approved as the first appointee of the Traffic Commission. It was moved by
Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to appoint Ron
Guerriero and Knox Johnson who each received four votes on the first ballot.
The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember
Lindemans to nominate Jerry Godnick and Randy Luth as the final two
appointees. After discussion, Councilmember Mu~oz and Lindemans withdrew
the motion and second.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Moore to appoint Jerry Godnick as the fourth member of the commission. The
motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to appoint Bill Keller. The motion did not carry with the required four votes on
the following roll call:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Birdsall to appoint Steve Sander.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes\9\24\90 -2- 09/25/90
City Council Minutes September 24, 1990
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
No report given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
No report given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
No reports given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore, to
adjourn at 10:25 PM to a meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 25, 1990 at
7:00 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR
JUNE S. GREEK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Minutes\9\24\90 -3- 09/25/90
ITEM NO. 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Deputy City Clerk
October 2, 1990
Application for Beverage License - Denny's Restaurant #1947
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file
BACKGROUND: The enclosed copy of an application for ABC License is for a
restaurant located at 28915 Rancho California Road. This is provided for Council's
information and requires no formal action.
CO PY De
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BLrVERAG! LICENSE(S)·
To,, Department of Alcaho.c Beverage Car%t~oi
19OI Broadway ~-'~/~ ~""~'
Sacramento, Calif. 95818 )~ ,.,/. 41-~n 5,1e ~er & 1dine GEOGRAPHICAL
The undersigned hereby applies/or ' \q Date
Issued
licenses described as follows: ~ Tamp. Permit
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICAdIT(S)
DtlIRy'S INC. ! Applied under Sec. 24044 []
Effective Date: Effective Date:
~, j ~. ::~: ,.., 3. 'TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE
· This LJF4--For Needqvarterl O~te
·
I..T~.YPE(S) OF LiCENSE(S) FILE NO. 1
RECEIPT NO.
SLock transfpr $ l~{J.OO
LtC.
TYPE
41
· 4. N~me
o... , ,9,7
'~' 5, Locadon of Business--Number and Street
28915 Ilache C~llfornta Rd.
6. If Premises~ Licensed,
Sh~w Type of License' 41 OIt Sele Beer & tithe EeHng lqsce
TOTAL
7. Are Premises Inside
City Limits?
s
100.00 41
(Tamp) (Perre)
Per~
IIA I'~ve you ever been convicted of a felony? : 10. Have you ever violated any of ~e provisions of the Alcoholic
· Beverage Control ~t or regulations of the Depadment per-
~. J ~ / ,'.4,- gaining to the Ad?
f h' r · I~e,,nT's I,c. his
eta ol ted f Be CAd.
' (b) that he will not violate or cause or perrag be ~ a any o t · provisions o t · co o ic verage ontro
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Counh/'of ._~__(~l~J!l_g~ .......................... Date ...........................
· 14. A~ICA~
~ HERE
15. STATE .~ CALI~RNIA Cwn~ ........ ~ .............................
....... ~,;,,~, , .
(:..:: · :.,~.~. ":.,,~' '-..
ITEM NO. 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT.'
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 2, 1990
CDBG Program - Three Year Coorperative Agreement
First Amendment
Prepared by:
Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Amendment to the Three-year Cooperative Agreement for
Community Developemnt Block Grant Program with the County of Riverside.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved a three-year cooperative agreement with the County of
Riverside on August 14, 1990. The Economic Development Agency of the County
has advised us that because of a missing provision which is required by the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and because of a typographical
error an amendment to the agreement is necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT.'
None
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
A G E N C Y
FilVEFISIDI: COUNTY · 3499 TENTH ST. · P.0. BOX 1180 · FIIVFItSIDE. CA 92502 · (714) 788-9770 · FAX (7'I4) 788-1415
AVIAT10N · FCONOMIC & GOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · tt[:DFVELOPMI:NT
Dave Dixon, City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
September 21, 1990
Dear Mr. Aleshire:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Block Grant Program
Three Year Cooperation Agreement 1991-1993
First Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement
The Los Angeles Area Office, Region IX of the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD), has received and reviewed the Three Year Cooperation
Agreement for 1991-1993, and have determined that the language of the CPD
Notice 90-24, paragraph 2(g) as highlighted in that notice must be included in
the Cooperation Agreements. Additionally, there is a typographical error in
the Cooperation Agreement (paragraph 4(e)) that shows an incorrect citation.
The attached "First Amendment to the Three-Year Cooperation Agreement for the
Community Development Block Grant Funds" amends the Cooperation Agreement as
requested by HUD. Cities not executing the Amendment will not be
participating in the Urban County Qualification
It is necessary that the three signed Amendments and the Minute Order
authorizing the execution of the amendment be submitted to this office no
later than the 9th of October, 1990. It is required (CPD Notice 90-24
paragraph 2.e) that the agreement be executed by the chief executive officer
of the unit of government.
County staff will coordinate with you to pick up the documents at the earliest
possible date. Should you have any questions please contact me, 714-788-9770.
Your cooperation in processing this request expeditiously is appreciated.
SMN:tlt
(0409S)(13131)
Very truly yours,
SUSAN MANEE-NAMSLEY
Deputy Director - Grants
1
3
4
6
7
.g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
?.,4
27
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE THREE-YEAR COOPERATION AGREEMENT
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
This First Amendment to the "Cooperation Agreement
Community Development Block Grant Funds Implementing The Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974 As Amended By The Housing
and Urban Rural. Recovery Act of 1983" (the "Agreement") is made
and entered into this day of , 1990, by and
between COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, (the
'County") and The City of Temecu]~ , (the
"CITY"). an incorporated municipality within the geographical
boundaries of the COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Agreement on
'August 30, 1990 and;
WHEREAS, cooperating cities in Riverside County have
elected to continue to participate as cooperating cities with
the Urban County of Riverside County for Federal Fiscal Years
1991, 1992 and 1993;
WHEREAS, the Agreement allows the County to carry out
activities which will he. funded by Community Development Block
Grants;
WHEREAS, the Agreement allows the cooperating cities to
participate in the Urban County Community Development Block
Grant program;
//
//
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, this First Amendment to the standard
three-year cooperation agreement has been requested and approved
by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the
parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
1. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add
a new subparagraph 4(h) as follows:
"(h) The City and County agree that Community
Development Block Grant funding for any
activities in or in support of any cooperating
City, that does not affirmatively further fair
housing within its own jurisdiction, or that
impedes the County's action to comply with its
fair housing certification is prohibited."
2. Section 4(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended in
its entirety to read 'as follows:
"(e) CITY is subject to the same requirements
applicable to subrecipients, including the
requirement for a written agreement set forth in
24 CFR 570.503."
3. All other terms, provisions, and conditions ef said
Agreement not expressly modified herein shall remain in full
force and effect.
//
//
1
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties have executed this First Amendment to the
Agreement on the day and date first written above.
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By:
Deputy
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST: CITY OF
By: By:
Mayor
COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION
The Office of the County Counsel hereby certifies that the
terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized
under State and local law and that the Agreement provides full
legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake or assist in
undertaking essential community development and housing
assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly
assisted housing.
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By:
Deputy
SMW:tlt
(o4oss)
ITEM NO. 5
~PPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 2, 1990
Pilot Transit Program Within the City of Temecula
Prepared by Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter of support to be signed by the Mayor
and the members of the City Council and to enter into an agreement, subject to
approval of the City Attorney, to serve as sponsor for the applicant Thomas Mindiola.
DISCUSSION:
Thomas Mindiola has drafted a proposal to provide local transportation to the
Temecula Valley including a route service plan which will include shuttle buses for
tourist, specialized service to seniors and the handicapped and subscription service for
special events.
Mr. Mindiola is interested in applying for a grant to insure the success of this project.
A part of the approval process for such a grant requires the applicant to demonstrate
the support of local government. He has received a similar letter of support from
County Supervisor Walt Abraham,
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact in sending a letter of support. The agreement, to be
negotiated in the future, may require some expenditure of funds and sponsorship
requires that the funding is processed by the sponsor which will require some
administration cost.
September 5, 1990
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION
FOR TEMECULA VALLEY. REQUEST A LETTER OF SUPPORT
AND A COMMITTMENT FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD OF SERVICE
WITH FURTHER OPTIONS AT TWO YEAR INTERVALS.
Honorable Mayor Park and Members of the City Council:
The City of Temecula and the unincorporated surrounding areas
currently consist of an approximate population of 47,000.
Southern California has for the past few years, been one of
the fastest growing areas in California, with a growth per-
centage in Temecula averaging 30% per year based on the 1989
statistics, substantially larger than the states' average.
It is estimated that the Temecula Valley accounts for about 30%
of total growth in Riverside County.
Local publications indicate that the current work force sur-
rounding the Temecula area, within a 20 mile radius, is over
100,000. The rapid growth is attracting many new fast food
and regular restaurants, hotels, and motels, manufacturing
and the service industry. It is imperative that the City provide
the transportation for it's work force, not only to connect
people with their jobs, but to minimize the impact on traffic.
My company is proposing to provide a route service, shuttle
buses for tourism, specialized service for the senior and
handicapped, and subscription service for special events.
With this letter, I hereby request an agreement of support
for a period of three years with further options of three
year intervals with the City serving as sponsor. One of the
criteria of the funding source is that the applicant submit
a formal application through a public sponsor. Once the grant
is approved, the funds will flow through the sponsor to the
applicant. It gives the sponsor an opportunity to review the
reporting process and know that all of the requirements are
met.
In addition to our plans for immediate service, it is our
intent to provide service to new housing development in the
Temecula Valley and to use growth indicators in an effort to
best provide for the expansion of the system. During this time
modifications and adjustments to the system routing, schedules,
and mileage are anticipated to adequately service the evolving
transit needs of the community.
It would be very much appreciated if the City could provide me
with a letter of support signed by the Mayor and all of the
members of City Council of the City of Temecula, so that I may
receive a substantial grant from the Federal Government for
the initiation of this pilot program.
es ~ mi te , ~
.I Thom M ' ~"~
cc: David Dixon, City Manager
September 5, 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
Thomas Mindiola
PROPOSED TRANSIT PLAN
ROUTE ~1 was established to meet the needs of the elderly
and handicapped by providing service to medical facilities
and major shopping centers, the library and County offices,
Ynez to Nicholas to Calle Medusa to Serena Way to Margarita
ROUTE #2 was established to provide access to the commercial
and industrial areas and is designed to provide a schedule
adequate in meeting the needs for job transportation.
Rancho California Rd to Margarita to Highway #79 to Palm
Rd. to Front Street to Winchester to Ynez Rd.
ROUTE #3 was established to provide citizens in rural areas
with convenient and accessible transportation and to promote
the use of local shopping areas.
Rancho California Rd to Business Park Dr. to Diaz to Calle
Comerico to Via Industrial to Ave. Alvarido.
PROPOSED FUTURE AND SUMMER SERVICE INCLUDE:
Special conmmter routes
San Jacinto College
Menifee
Lake Skinner
Local Wineries and Vineyards
To schedule or coordinate with other transportation providers
for connecting routes to:
Lake Elsinore
Corona
Escondido
Fallbrook
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEM ECULA AGENDA REPORT
CITY MANGER/CITY COUNCIL
MARY JANE HENRY, FINANCE OFFICER
OCTOBER 2, 1990
REQUIREMENT FOR FUNDING SOCIAL PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION:
DISCUSSION:
That The City Council
Direct the City Manager to review the requests for
funding for social services and make
recommendations to the CIty Council or;
Appoint an ad-hoc committee of two (2) City Council
members and the City Manager to review request for
funding for social services and make
recommendations to the City Council.
When the City Council adopted the FY 1991 operating
budget, the Council directed staff to return with the
requests for funding for social services in ninety days.
Staff is requesting direction on who is to preform the
review of requests per number 1 or 2 above.
ITEM NO. 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Deputy City Clerk
October 2, 1990
Request for Funding - Mrs. Temecula (Mrs. California/America
Pageant)
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct the staff to include this request in the review of the requests for funding
to be reviewed for consideration in the 1990-91 fiscal budget.
BACKGROUND:
In August the City Council considered the matter of funding for the Mrs.
Temecula candidate to the Mrs. California/America pageant. At that time the
matter was considered in a study session and action could not be taken to
either grant or deny funding. The City Council directed staff to bring this
matter back for consideration on a regular agenda. Since this request was not
received prior to the consideration of 1990-91 budget, it is the recommendation
of staff that it be considered at the same time as the Council considers the
requests which were heard during the budget hearings and deferred for 90
days.
FISCAL IMPACT.'
The request for funding is for $250 to $500.
ANGEI,ES
DIEGO
TEMECULA
ERICKSON & ASSOCIATES
J Finandal l~lanm'ng Comt~;~ny
JULY 30,1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
DAVE DIXON, CITY MANAGER
P.O. BOX 3000
TEMECULA, CA 92390
FIN,\.','CI,\L PLANNING
INVEST.MENTS
EMPLOY),IENT BENEFITS
DEAR MR. DIXON AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
IT IS WITH A GREAT DEAL OF HONOR AND PRIDE TO INPORM YOU THAT I
HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO WEAR THE TITLE OF MRS. TEMECULA, 1991.
IN REPRESENTING THIS GREAT CITY, THERE ARE MJUNY DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES WMICM ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TITLE; ONE OF WHICH
IS PARTICIPATING IN THE MRS. CALIFORNIA-AMERICA PAGEANT TO BE HELD
IN FEBRUARY IN LOS ANGELES ( THE OFFICIAL STATE FINALS TO THE
NATIONALLY TELEVISED MRS. AMERICA PAGEANT ).
AS YOUR MRS. TEMECULA , I AM REQUESTING YOUR SUPPORT IN HELPING
TO DEFRAY THE NIGH COST OF HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS, MEALS, MEETINGS,
ADVERTISING, EVENING-WEAR, SWIM SUIT, INTERVIEW SUIT AND
ACCESSORIES. IN RETURN FOR YOUR SUPPORT, YOU WILL RECEIVE YOUR
NAME AND/OR COMPANY NAME LISTED IN A VERY SPECIAL SECTION OF THE
SOUVENIR PAGEa~NT PROGRAM BOOKWHICH WILL BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT
THE PAGEANT. IN ADDITION, YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO USE MRS. TEMECULA
IN ANY PROMOTIONAL EVENT(S) THROUGHOUT THE YEAR FOR YOUR COMPANY
OR CLUB ACTIVITY.
YOU ARE ONE OF TEN EXCLUSIVELY SELECTED SPONSORSHIPS TO SUPPORT
MRS. TEMECULA IN THE MRS. CALIFORNIA-AMERICA PAGEANT. A SUPPORT
LEVEL O[ BETWEEN $250 AND $500 DOLLARS WOULD BE GREATLY
APPRECIATED. I HAVE ENCLOSEDAN OFFICIAL SPONSORSHIP FORM FOR YOUR
REVIEWAND A RETURN ENVELOPE FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. PLEASE MAKE ALL
CHECKS OUT KIM FOSS ERICKSON, MRS. TEMECULA.
AS I STATED EARLIER, I AM VERY PROUD TO WEAR THE TITLE OF MRS.
TEMECULA, 1991, AND WILL DO EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO
ENTHUSIASTICALLY REPRESENT THE BUSINESS PEOPLE, RESIDENTS, AND
LEADERS OF THIS EXPANDING AND DYNAMIC TEMECULA VALLEY. THANK YOU
FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
S I NCE~Y
K~S~N
MRS. TEMECULA 1991
(714) 694-0068 FAX (714)694-1590
4166l P, ntcrprise Circle Nnrth. Suite 217. T~mccula. California 92390