HomeMy WebLinkAbout120898 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
DECEMBER 8, 1998 - 7:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency pursuant
to Government Code Sections:
1. Consideration of: appointment for the position :of City Managerpursuant:to :the
provisions of Government Code Section 54957.
2. Conference with City :Attorney and legal counsel pursuant :to Government Code
Section 54956~9(b)with~ respect to two (2) matters ofpotentiaHitigation. With respect
to each matter, the City Attorney has determined that apoint: has !been reached where
there is a significant exposure to litigation involVingii:the City an:d/or the:Agency on::
existing facts :and: circumstances.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 98-22
Resolution: No. 98-113
Sara Pillus
Pastor Robert Gonzalez of House to House Ministry
Councilman Comerchero
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts
R:~Agenda\120898
1
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Achievement to Darin Edward Evans for attainin.cl Eagle Scout
Certificate of Appreciation to Ginny Reynolds - Old Town Ambassador
Certificate of Appreciation to Kay Williams - Old Town Liaison
Presentation of the Citv's updated Web Page
Presentation of the Economic Development Strate.clv Report by Dr. John Husing
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
2
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be Enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Resolution ApDrovin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\120898
2
4
5
6
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Rel3ort as of October 31, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1998
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the minutes of October 13, 1998;
4.2 Approve the minutes of October 27, 1998;
4.3 Approve the minutes of November 3, 1998;
Lease One (1) Electric Truck
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the 36-month lease for one (1) 1999 Ford Ranger electric vehicle from
Fritts Ford Fleet Center in the amount of $15,553.71.
Consent to Record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant Easement for Portion of Lot
539 of Tract No. 3883
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION OF AN
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A GRANT OF
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES FOR LOT 539 OF
TRACT 3883 FOR PURPOSES OF RECORDATION BUT NOT
ACCEPTING THIS DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
R:~.genda\120898
3
7
8
9
10
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-1 ('located at the southeasterly corner of
Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOM MEN DATI ON:
7.1 Accept the public streets and sewer and water system improvements in Tract No.
22915-1;
7.2 Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities to the 10% warranty
amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-2 (located northeasterly of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Accept the Public Improvements Faithful Performance in Tract No. 22916-2;
8.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the 10% warranty
amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-F ('located at the northeasterly corner
of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-F;
9.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the 10% warranty amount
and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Passen.cter Loading Zone - East Side of Margarita Road between Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING PASSENGER LOADING ZONE
ON THE EAST SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN
PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD
R:~Agenda\120898
4
11
12
Program Supplement No. M002 to Administerin.q Local Agency/State A.qreement for
Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 ('009)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M002 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. STPLG-
5459(009) FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ON VIA LAS
COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
Pro.clram Supplement Agreement No. M003 to Administering Local A.qency/State
Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 (009)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M003 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. HP 21L-
1188(001) OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING FROM YNEZ
ROAD TO JEFFERSON AVENUE
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\120898
5
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING.
.:.. :.:.~ .~,:." ... ....... .. ...;.:.:":'... .: '.' :. ..
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01
Resolution: No. CSD 98-19
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 17, 1998.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
R:~Agenda\120898
6
2 Proposed Residential Street Lightin.q Fee - Parcel Map No. 26488
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1998, FOR PROPERTY OWNERS OF
LOTS 1-4 WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 26488 TO ESTABLISH
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING
FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID,
SECTION 6, OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
2.2Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion,
Return, and Tabulation of the Ballots;
2.3 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant
to the aforementioned process.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Naming of City Park
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve a recommendation from the Community Services Commission to name
the 4.5 acre park site, located on Margarita Road, Winchester Creek Park.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 15, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\120898
7
******~W****;****:*****'~,IA A A**~*********~*************************** A Z,, **" A ,~ A*******i******~*******:**'*'A A a**!,',
TEMECULA REOEVEt-OPMENT. AGENCY MEETme .. :.:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 98-01
Resolution: No. RDA 98-14
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 17, 1998.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 15, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District
Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\120898
8
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval
of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing.
13
Parking In-Lieu Pro.clram for Old Town Temecula (Planning Application No. PA98-0472;
Old Town Specific Plan Amendment establishing the Parking In-Lieu Program; and PA97-
0292: Parking In-Lieu Fee for Old Town Temecula)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
ESTABLISH THE PARKING IN-LIEU PROGRAM AND REVISE
THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0472)
13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING THE PARKING IN-LIEU FEE WITHIN
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE
BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE FEE (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA97-0292)
14 Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99,
TO BE EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 6, 1999, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER ~5.06 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND
RESOLUTIONS 97-94 AND 98-30
R:~,genda\120898
9
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Planning A.qreement
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve the City's participation in the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Planning
Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
16 Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Oral report from staff on status of annexation proposal.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 15, 1998, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\120898
10
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
0 ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Jim O'Gra~~
Assistant ger
December 8, 1998
Economic Development Strategy Report
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Dr. Husing's report and calendar for
consideration at the January 26, 1999 City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND: Approximately one year ago the City retained Dr. John Husing to develop an
economic development strategy for the City of Temecula. Dr. Husing met with a number of
community members, reviewed various demographic and economic data, and in May prepared
a preliminary draft of this report. This report was subsequently sent to the Council, staff and
approximately twenty community leaders for review.
Dr. Husing has incorporated the comments from this review and on December 2 submitted his
final report. This report was distributed earlier this week to give you and the various community
leaders that previously participated in this study additional time to review the report prior to the
Council meeting. Dr. Husing plans to attend the December 8 Council meeting and will be
prepared to answer questions about the report and its recommendations.
The report contains a number of findings and recommendations that should be carefully
considered by the Council and the community. For this reason, and because of the very limited
review time, staff recommends that the Council accept the report but defer action until your
January 26, 1999, meeting. This would allow staff and the other individuals and groups time
to develop recommendations to you.
FISCAL IMPACT None at this time. Council actions as a result of this report may have fiscal
impacts at a future date.
R: iOGRAD YJtECONOMIC DEVEL OPMEN7~HUSING COUNCIL REPORT 981208. DOC 1 12/3/,98
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $1,372,421.89.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 8th day of December, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R~sos 98- 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 8th day of December, 1998 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Rcsos 98- 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
11/12/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/19/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/25/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/08/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/12/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
11/25/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12108/98 COUNCIL MEETING:
$ 183,964.19
333,595.69
80,757.55
449,756.78
164,362.44
159,985.24
$ 1,372,421.89
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
191
192
193
194
210
280
300
320
330
340
390
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
$ 679,216.17
58,481.12
67,593.13
17,295.01
23,923.26
21,911.19
569.77
59,488.76
73,902.27
5,945.73
26,597.66
7,303.89
5,826.25
20.00
$ 1,048,074.21
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
233,784.52
5,697.00
56,001.22
138.68
352.91
4,574.22
1,171.45
3,582.14
1,417.97
6,155.12
3,252.05
8,220.40
324,347.68
1,372,421.89
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
11/12/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/19/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/25/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/08/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/12/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
11/25/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/08198 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCS D
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED Bp(~HERESA ALVA~/.~,CCOUNTI SPECIALIST
$ 183,964.19
333,595.69
80,757.55
449,756.78
164,362.44
159,985.24
$ 1,372,421.89
679,216.17
58,481.12
67,593.13
17,295.01
23,923.26
21,911.19
569.77
59,4~8.76
73,902.27
5,945.73
26,597.66
7,303.89
5,826.25
20.00
$ 1,048,074.21
233,784.52
5,697.00
56,001.22
138.68
352.91
4.574.22
1,171.45
3,582.14
1,417.97
6,155.12
3,252.05
8,220.40
324,347.68
$ 1,372,421.89
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT' ','HE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHREZ
11/12/98
IZ:30
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 12
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOg/HOD SET ASIDE
190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - C!P
300 iNSURANCE FUND
]20 INFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
86,807.58
9,168.03
37,204.93
419.59
62.55
15,115,40
304.78
6,168.24
10,668.70
5,621.44
8,755.66
339.91
3,317.38
10.00
18:5,964.19
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
12:30
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52620 11/05/98 JACOBS, BARBARA
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52623 11/12/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS
52624 11/12/98 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC.
52625 11/12/98 000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
52626 11/12/98 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE
52626 11/12/98 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE
52627 11/12/98 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
52628 11/12/98 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52629 11/12/98 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
52630 11/12/98 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE
52631 11/12/98 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
52631 11/12/98 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
REFUND:SWIMMING CLASSES
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
COBRA/NOV 98/NELSON/VISION
NOV BILLBOARD ADVERTISING O.T.
CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT MUSEUM
(6)"CITY OF TEMECULA" FLAGS
SALES TAX
MEMBERSHIP DUES 99 G.THORNHILL
TEMP HELP W/E 10/24 WILLIAMS
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
MICROFILM SUPPLIES
O.T. AD IN DESIGN HOUSE PRGM
MEMBERSHIP:T.COLE & CARRANZA
MEMBERSHIP:T.COLE & CARRANZA
190-183-4975
001-2310
165-2310
190-2310
193-2310
280-2310
300-2310
340-2310
001-1180
280-199-999-5362
210-190-808-5804
340-199-701-5250
340-199-701-5250
001-161-999-5226
280-199-999-5118
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
280-199-999-5362
330-199-999-5250
001-162-999-5214
27.00
632.30
12.90
55.92
1.72
4.30
4.30
21.50
17.20
1,700.00
95.00
1,200.00
93.00
404.00
622.43
473.85
16.24
40.60
52.00
8.00
20.00
200.00
52.00
52.00
27.00
750.14
1,700.00
95.00
1,293.00
404.00
622.43
610.69
200.00
104.00
52632 11/12/98 003403 BARGAIN BULLETIN ADVERTISING FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
900.00
900.00
52633 1!/12/98 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY INSURANCE:MUSEUM/CHAPEL 300-199-999-5200
52633 11/12/98 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY INSURANCE:MUSEUM/CHAPEL 300-199-999-5200
449.00
112.00
561.00
52634 11/12/98 003466 BASKET & BALLOONS TO0! BALLOONS:MALL GROUNDBREAKING 001-111-999-5270
144.61
144.61
52635 11/12/98 003405 BEDARD CONCRETE CONSTRU RES IMPROV.PRGM:HURT 165-199-813-5804
52636 11/12/98 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SY ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING 320-199-999-5261
52636 11/12/98 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SY ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING 320-199-999-5261
52637 11/12/98 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES NOV RESTROOM RENTAL IN O.T. 280-199-999-5234
3,000.00
3,300.00
525.00
826.00
3,000.00
3,825.00
826.00
52638 11/12/98 001260 C P R S
52639 11/12/98 001260 C P R S
ENTRY FEE FOR AWARD SUBMITTAL 190-180-999-5250
ENTRY FEE FOR AWARD SUBMITTAL 190-180-999-5250
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/12/98 12:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52640 11/12/98 001260
52641
ENTRY FEE FOR AWARD SUBMITTAL 190-180-999-5250
30.00
30.00
52643 11/12/98 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA FILING FEE:PUBL]C FACILITIES 390-199-999-5227
10.00
10.00
52644 11/12/98 002803 CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP JUL-SEP PROF SRVCS-OVERLAND DR 210-165-604-5802 1,000.00
1,000.00
52645 11/12/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 300-199-999-5205 2,122.30
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
12:30
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52645 11/12/98 000131
52646 11/12/98 003349
52647 11/12/98 001195
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES
TROLLEY SERVICE FOR OLD TOWN
ALARM MONITORING - CRC
300-199-999-5205
280-199-999-5362
190-182-999-5250
265.25
540.00
50.00
2,387.55
540.00
50.00
52648 11/12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S
52648 11/12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S
52648 11/12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S
52648 11/12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S
52648 11,12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S
52648 11/12/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER
52649 11/12/98 001193 COMP USA, INC.
52649 11/12/98 001193 COMP USA, INC.
52650 11/12/98 002147
52651 11/12/98 003252
COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS
CONTRACT SERVICES CORP.
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
FAMILY FUN NIGHT ENTERTAINMENT
JANITORIAL PRODUCTS -CITY HALL
52652 11/12/98 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-183-999-5370
340-199-701-5212
190-2140
52653 11/12/98 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP PLOTTER PAPER OLD TOWN POSTERS 280-199-999-5362
52653 11/12/98 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP FREIGHT 280-199-999-5362
52653 11/12/98 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362
22.00
39.75
39.75
66.50
47.75
107.02
235.98
508.58
125.00
4.26
82.50
139.90
6.03
10.84
322.77
744.56
125.00
4.26
82.50
156.77
52654 11/12/98 002413 DALEY & HEFT JUN-SEPT LEGAL SERVICES- CLAIM 300-199-999-5246
52655 11/12/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 001-140-999-5250
52655 11/12/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 001-170-999-5250
52656 11/12/98 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE OCTOBER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001-110-999-5248
52657 11/12/98 DE MAHY, PAMELA REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
52658 1~/12/98 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING RES IMPROV.PRGM:KNAPP 165-199-813-5804
52659 11/12/98 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK OCT SPEC.EVENT INSURANCE PREM. 300-2180
1,954.53
269.25
269.25
2,000.00
100.00
1,000.00
539.92
1,954.53
538.50
2,000.00
100.00
1,000.00
539.92
52660 11/12/98 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218
69.50
69.50
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52661 11/12/98 001380 E S
52662 11/12/98 002712
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 DONAHOE
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 DEGANGE
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 SERVEN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 SERVEN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/23 SERVEN
ECONOMIC CONSULTING SERVICES
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
001-111-999-5248
198.18
198.18
396.36
2,996.80
2,858.40
373.60
747.20
373.60
1,000.00
8,142.32
1,000.00
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
12:30
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52663
52663
52663
52663
52663
52663
52664
52665
52665
52665
52665
52665
52665
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
000478
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FAST SIGNS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
SEPT LDSC MAINT - SLOPES
SEPT LDSC MAINT - SPORTS PARK
LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-RANCHO CAL.
LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-EL GRECO
LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-N.GEN.KEARNY
LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-SLOPES
SIGNS OLD TOWN CONSTRUCTION
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
13,375.00
18,578.00
97.62
182.31
77.25
57.72
1,201.10
13.75
20.75
38.00
53.00
11.25
12.50
32,367.90
1,201.10
149.25
52666
52667
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52668
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
002832
003468
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
FENCE BUILDERS
FINDLEY REPORT, THE
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
RES IMPROV.PRGM:BISZANTZ
REPORTS FOR FINANCE DEPT
5477-2590-4220-7824-jC-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9798-JS-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9152-KL-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9152-KL-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9152-KL-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9277-RR-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9277-RR-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9830-RB-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9830-RB-OCT
5477-2590-3378-9830-RB-OCT
5477-2590-3379-6165-GY-OCT
5477-2590-3379-6165-GY-OCT
5477-2592-2370-1405-DU-OCT
5477-2590-3379-0432-EA-OCT
5477-2590-0803-1143-HP-OCT
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LTD
LTD
LTD
165-199-813-5804
001-140-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5228
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
001-110-999-5263
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5258
001-110-999-5223
001-150-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-1170
340-199-701-5263
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
001-2380
165-2380
190-2380
3,585.00
50.00
341.70
510.42
40.88
40.88
52.24
1,397.42
108.29
51.35
297.00
953.00
78.16
392.18
28.35
118.58
17.68
742.50
11.25
136.35
.45
1.35
14.85
5.85
6.75
4.50
18.00
9.00
21.15
1,407.11
27.88
234.43
3,585.00
50.00
4,428.13
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
12:30
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52669
52671
52671
52671
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
!i/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
000184
000184
000184
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
909-308-1079 OCT GENERAL USAGE
909-695-1409 OCT GENERAL USAGE
909-695-3539 OCT GENERAL USAGE
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
165-2500
190-2500
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
.90
2.29
27.77
7.57
14.08
8.58
44.71
8.91
32.13
1,511.74
29.95
251.84
.97
2.46
29.84
8.12
15.13
9.21
48.03
9.57
34.53
57.72
91.87
39.75
4,739.75
189.34
52672
52672
52673
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
001355
001355
003336
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
GARAGE DOOR SERVICE COM
MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO, OPEN LINE
MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE
RES IMPROV. PRGM:KNAPP
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
165-199-813-5804
320.00
320.00
600.00
640.00
600.00
52674
52675
52675
52675
52675
52675
52675
52675
52676
52676
52677
52677
52677
52677
52678
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000194
000194
000194
000194
001407
GUNRUD, SHARON
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HOLLIMON, DIMIETRI
HOLLIMON, DIMIETRI
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
REFUND:COOKING W/TIA THERESA
MIBC HARDWARE SUPPLIES -FIRE
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - BLDG
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS
SPORTS SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
ADDT'L ROOM RENTAL
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
MISC POOL SUPPLIES
190-183-4982
001-171-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
340-199-701-5212
001-162-999-5242
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5380
190-184-999-5212
190-2900
190-183-4990
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
190-182-999-5212
10.00
27.23
66.54
154.98
169.87
507.16
110.17
53.86
100.00
8.50-
1,556.24
18.75
234.00
31.45
332.41
10.00
1,089.81
91.50
1,840.44
332.41
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/12/98 12:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52679 11/12/98 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN
001-2140
282.01
282.01
52680 11/12/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN CREDIT:ITEM PAID PREVIOUSLY
52680 11/12/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
98.28-
691.20
592.92
52681 11/12/98 002140
52681 11/12/98 002140
52681 11/12/98 002140
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
52682 11/12/98 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP
GROUPWISE 5.5 SOFTWARE MASTER 320-199-999-5211
GROUPWISE 5.5 USER LICENSE MLA 320-199-999-5211
SALES TAX 320-199-999-5211
SISTER CITY FLAG:JAPAN
SISTER CITY FLAG:NETHERLANDS
LIBERTY FLOOR STANDS
BRASS BALL TOP ORNAMENTS
8' TWO PIECE OAK FLAG POLES
SHIPPING
SALES TAX
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
125.00
1,980.00
163.14
54.00
39.00
70.00
49.00
80.00
12.00
22.63
2,268.14
326.63
52683 11/12/98 002531
52684 11/12/98 000488
52685 11/12/98 002779
52686 11/12/98 002295
52686 11/12/98 002295
52686 11/12/98 002295
52686 11/12/98 002295
KATY-FM RADIO
KNOTT'S BERRY FARM
KUHNS, ALLIE
LEWIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS
LEWIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS
LEgIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS
LEWIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS
RADIO ADVERTISING-O T PROMOS
TEEN EXCURSION 10/22/98
REIMB:JAPANESE VISITOR TOUR
SMALL METRIC TOOLS & EQUIP
SALES TAX
SMALL METRIC TOOLS & EQUIP
SALES TAX
280-199-999-5362
190-183-999-5320
001-101-999-5280
001-165-999-5242
001-165-999-5242
001-165-999-5242
001-165-999-5242
1,156.00
1,000.00
229.00
187.40
13.59
48.00
3.48
1,156.00
1,000.00
229.00
252.47
52687 11/12/98 002229
52688 11/12/98 001967
52689 11/12/98 000217
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52690 11/12/98 003076
52691 11/12/98 001384
52692 11/12/98 001892
52693 11/12/98
52694 11/12/98 003382
LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP
MET LIFE
MET LIFE
MET LIFE
MET LIFE
MET LIFE
MET LIFE
OCT PRESS CLIPPING SERVICES
TEMP HELP W/E 10/25 BELIAN
OCT SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SERVICE
003076 DENTALML
003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
NSURANCE COMP NOV 98 NELSON/FLAMMER
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MOBILE MODULAR
MOE, GERALD Q.
O'GRADY, JAMES B.
STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS
NOV TRAILER RENTAL:OLD TOWN
REFUND:PARKING CITATION #11630
REIMB:ICMA CF:ORLANDO:10/24-28
001-111-999-5270
001-162-999-5118
190-183-999-5380
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
280-2340
300-2340
340-2340
001-1180
001-161-999-5222
280-199-999-5362
001-170-4055
001-110-999-5258
364.70
464.40
2,948.00
2,629.78
97.79
270.36
20.87
58.67
19.56
78.23
106.50
98.53
420.23
50.00
1,213.18
364.70
464.40
2,948.00
3,281.76
98.53
420.23
5O.OO
1,213.18
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/12/98 12:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52695 11/12/98 002292 OASIS VENDING
52695 11/12/98 002292 OASIS VENDING
SUPPLIES:CITY HALL/MAINT. FAC. 340-199-701-5250
SUPPLIES:CITY HALL/MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5250
406.47
135.49
541.96
52696 11/12/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-604-5214
52696 11/12/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
52696 11/12/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
28.02
25.95
25.64
79.61
52697 11/12/98 002652 OSCAR'S
REFRESHMENTS:NAKAYAMA:11/9/98 001-101-999-5280
320.74
320.74
52698 1 ~/12/98 000667 P A P A
SEM:P.DESERT:12/08:HARRINGTON 190-180-999-5261
45.00
45.00
52699 11/12/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI OCT PROF.DESIGN SVCS:COMM.DEV. 210-190-158-5804
701.25
701.25
52700 11/12/98 003069 PACK N MAIL #1 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES 330-199-999-5230
35.00
35.00
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11.~12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
52701 11/12/98 000245
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
PERS (HEALTH
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 484.77
000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 214.33
000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 71.43
000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,126.54
000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 361.15
000245 BLSHIELD 280-2090 1.05
000245 CIGNA 001-2090 844.50
000245 CIGNA 300-2090 39.46
000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 5,886.33
000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 783.85
000245 HELTHNET 191-2090 15.56
000245 HELTHNET 192-2090 51.23
000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 411.42
000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 248.37
000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 1.83
000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 155.25
000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 834.33
000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 2,392.15
000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 148.83
000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 3,607.57
000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 780.80
000245 PACIFICR 193-2090 19.10
000245 PC 001-2090 16.00
000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 2,762.53
000245 PERS DED 001-2090 944.70
000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 113.65
000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 100.79
000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 33.59
000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 3.48
000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 52.07
000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 377.93
000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 38.88
000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 13.35
000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 18.90
000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 152.56
000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 33.90
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/12/98 12:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52701 11/12/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 193-2090 1.78
52701 11/12/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 154.14
52701 11/12/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 981.37-
22,316.73
52702 11/12/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 73.84 73.84
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-171-999-5220
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-163-999-5214
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5265
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5220
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-604-5260
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 340-199-701-5212
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5261
52703 11/12/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320
5.00
16.98
45.24
12.54
26.98
172.81
12.76
72.63
38.50
25.32
47.90
12.00
47.15
535.81
52704 11/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADS:HUMAN RESOURCE 001-150-999-5254
52704 11/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0386 001-161-999-5256
52704 11/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0347 001-161-999-5256
52704 11/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0348 001-161-999-5256
52704 11/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PA98-0410 001-161-999-5256
774.75
17.75
18.25
17.75
17.25
845.75
52705 11/12/98 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE EQUIP.RENTAL:P.S.EXPO:11/14/98 001-110-999-5278
229.15
229.15
52706 11/12/98 003447 RANCHO MAP CENTER
LAMINATED STATION BOUNDARY MAP 001-170-999-5222
710.00
710.00
52707 11/12/98 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC.
DISPLAY AD FOR RDA COMMITTEES 001-120-999-5254
105.00
lOS.00
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR AUG 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR AUG 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JUL 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR JUL 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR SEP 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2260
52708 11/12/98 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR SEP 98 PARKING CIT.ASSESSMENTS 001-2265
52709 11/12/98 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME ANNUAL HEALTH PERMIT:CRC 190-182-999-5250
440.00
1,400.00
1,517.50
605.00
1,551.00
220.00
418.00
5,733.50
418.00
52710 11/12/98 000268 RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT OCTOBER 98 K-RAT FEES 001-2300
52711 11/12/98 000357 RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT FINAL SERVICE LEVEL:FY 97/98 001-164-602-5405
52712 1'1/12/98 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & SEPT ENG.SVCS:SANTA GERTRUDIS 210-190-147-5802
52713 11/12/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-9~9-5212
52713 11/12/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH DEPOSITORY SAFE FOR SKATE PARK 190-183-999-5305
52713 11/12/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SALES TAX 190-183-999-5305
8,745.00
1,123.74
4,371.99
45.00
471.75
36.56
8,745.00
1,123.74
4,371.99
553.31
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/12/98 12:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52714 11/12/98 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320
52714 11/12/98 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301
52715 11/12/98 002536 SMITH, ZENAIDA B. REIMB:CMBTA CF:10/27-30/98 001-140-999-5258
52716 11/12/98 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI SKATE PARK EQUIPMENT 190-183-999-5305
245.15
98.34
170.14
515.67
343.49
170.14
515.67
52717 1! 12/98 003426 SNAP ON TOOLS
MAINT. EQUIPMENT:STATION #84 001-171-999-5215
12.66
12.66
52718 11/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-11-577-1966:VIA EDUARDO 190-199-999-5240
52718 11/t2/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281:CRC 190-182-999-5240
52718 11/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-671-5518:PALA TC1 191-180-999-5319
52718 11/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-901-7962:YUKON TC1 191-180-999-5319
52718 11/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 52-77-796-2616-01:MARGARITA TC 191-180-999-5319
52719 11/12/98 STORKERSEN, RUTH REFUND: GYMNASTICS 190-183-4982
52720 11/12/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW 001-163-999-5220
52720 11/12/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW 001-164-604-5220
52720 11/12/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC RECREATION SUPPLIES:TCC 190-184-999-5301
52721 11/12/98 003375
TAYLOR, BEA AUG-OCT PROF.SVCS:OLD TOWN 280-1240
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125
52722 11/12/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125
13.82
3,467.48
148.39
157.41
94.88
46.00
7.81
23.42
16.45
150.00
493.60
82.00
1.03
2.05
14.35
3.07
18.90
3,881.98
46.00
47.68
150.00
615.00
52723 1!/12/98 003120 TEMECULA ART GALLERY PERFORMANCE AT TEM ART GALLERY 280-199-999-5362
52724 11/12/98 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES:SKATE PARK 190-180-999-5212
2,000.00
47.00
2,000.00
47.00
52725 11/12/98 003140
52726 11/12/98 000919
TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
SPOOKTACULAR BOOTH REVENUE
RENTAL:CHAPARRAL HS:11/14/98
190-183-4992
001-110-999-5278
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020
52727 11/12/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020
52728 11/12/98 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220
52728 11/12/98 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5220
52728 11/12/98 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5220
205.80
626.00
3,621.50
271.25
480.00
183.75
9.50
350.00
118.54
31.17
49.54
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 186.20
205.80
626.00
4,916.00
199.25
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
12:30
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
52729 11/12/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
168.40
7.68
.34
1.70
3.40
4.68
178.60-
160.80
7.68
.34
1.70
3.40
4.68
372.40
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 1!/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
52730 11/12/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 7,178.87
C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 22.73
C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,282.71
C 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 2.49
C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 33.20
C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 25.00
C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 22.73
C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 83.33
C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 608.98
C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 158.32
9,418.36
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 817.64
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 174.91
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 765.50
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 84.55
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 330-2160 70.18
52731 11/12/98 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 77.28
1,990.06
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-110-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-120-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-162-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 190-180-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-170-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 280-199-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-140-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-150-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-161-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-164-604-5230
52732 1!/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-171-999-5230
52732 11/12/98 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE FOR BUS.LIC.RENEWALS 001-140-999-5230
52733 11/12/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120
52733 11/12/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120
52733 11/12/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120
204.16
108.62
911.94
96.18
386.68
5.24
216.36
436.03
77.82
738.21
278.12
3.53
1,531.84
127.50
.50
27.00
4,994.73
155.00
52734 11/12/98 002576 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO JUNE DESIGN SVC:SOUTHSIDE PLAN 001-161-999-5248 3,109.00 3,109.00
VOUCHRE2
11/12/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52735
52735
52736
52737
52737
12:30
CHECK
DATE
11/12/98
11/12/98
11/12/98
1~/12/98
11/12/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001342
001342
000339
002109
002109
VENDOR
NAME
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
~EST PUBLISHING COMPANY
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:TCC
CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
TRAFFIC PAINT
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-184-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-120-999-5228
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
92.14
215.07
124.45
53.16
4.12
PAGE 11
CHECK
AMOUNT
307.21
124.45
57.28
TOTAL CHECKS 183~964.19
VOUCHRE2
11/19/98
14:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/HOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
AMOUNT
137,174.73
48,343.01
26,567.55
16,833.74
23,858.22
6,762.62
239,99
34,477.99
12,932.87
240.96
16,972.52
6,906.50
2,274.99
10.00
TOTAL 333,595.69
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/19/98 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52738 11/13/98 002566 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
52739 11/13/98 000837 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
NOTICE OF LEVY:VALLEY MICRO 320-1970
FILIING FEE:PUBLIC FACILITIES 390-199-999-5227
6,899.42
10.00
6,899.42
10.00
52740 11/13/98 ADOHR FARMS DAIRY
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPO/K-9 TRAILS 001-110-999-5278
57.70
57.70
52741 11/13/98 002578 TEMEKU HILLS REC, LLC ROOM RENTAL FOR HOLIDAY PARTY 001-150-999-5265
500.00
500.00
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070
207217 1i/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 [NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070
207217 11/17/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070
274001 11/13/98 002622 STEWART TITLE OF INLAND 1ST TIME HOMEBUYER PRGM:JARA 165-199-999-5449
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070
294160 1~/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 ]NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070
294160 11/17/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070
19,045.38
304.94
3,838.78
8.79
22.38
304.18
74.47
148.07
48.63
633.04
175.80
614.42
4,550.50
91.75
1,030.45
2.44
6.24
77.61
20.95
57.91
24.16
129.54
56.74
140.39
24,000.00
44.52
3.24
51.03
2.83
4.68
5.15
4,958.19
121.54
870.38
1.53
3.67
60.56
10.67
54.02
14.63
153.35
31,407.56
24,000.00
VOUCHRE2
11/19/98 14:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
294160 11/17/98 000444
294160 11/17/98 000444
981117 11/17/98 003486
52744 11/19/98 000724
52744 11/19/98 000724
52745 11/19/98 000747
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
1ST TIME HOMEBUYER PRGM:POWELL
T-SHIRTS FOR 98 SAFETY EXPO
SALES TAX
MEMBER DUES FOR DAVID HOGAN
330-2070
340-2070
165-199-999-5449
001-110-999-5278
001-110-999-5278
001-161-999-5226
30.14
136.72
13,900.00
2,200.00
170.50
301.00
6,526.85
13,900.00
2,370.50
301.00
52746 11/19/98 001947 AMERIGAS
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263
70.55
70.55
52747 11/19/98 000101
52748 11/19/98 001445
52749 11/19/98 003466
APPLE ONE, INC.
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE
BASKET & BALLOONS TOO!
TEMP HELP W/E 10/31WILLIAMS
FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
BALLOONS:SPOOKTACULAR EVENT
280-199-999-5118
001-101-999-5267
190-183-999-5370
438.60
5,000.00
60.00
438,60
5,000.00
60.00
52750 11/19/98 002541
52751 11/19/98 000696
52752 11/19/98 000154
BECKER, WALTER KARL
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
CSMFO
REPAIRS TO VALLEJO CHANNEL
FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
MB:G.ROBERTS:1/01/99-12/31/99
001-164-601-5401
001-101-999-5267
001-140-999-5226
4,435.00
2,500.00
100.00
4,435.00
2,500.00
100.00
52753 11/19/98 003138 CAL MAT
52754 11/19/98 003214 CAL MAT
CITWIDE A.C. REPAIRS
CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
1,601,96
790.67
1,601.96
790.67
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52755 11/19/98 000128
52756 11/19/98 001089
52757 11/19/98 001655
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVES
CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
OCT 98 WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM
001-2370
165-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
194-2370
280-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
340-2370
001-1182
190-181-999-5112
DEBT SERV SEM:MCDERMOTT:12/8-9 001-140-999-5261
WELDING SERVS & SUPPLIES
190-184-999-5301
5,379.10
111.11
1,723.69
1.23
3.12
72.30
10.26
63.09
11.50
67.29
22.97
412.63
33.83
1.45
150.00
10.10
7,913.57
150.00
10.10
52758 11/19/98 003349
52759 11/19/98 000135
52759 1)/19/98 000135
CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
NOV TROLLEY SERVICE:OLD TOWN
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
280-199-999-5362
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
270.00
242.44
825.29
270.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/19/98 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52759 11/19/98 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244
399.29
1,467.02
52760 11/19/98 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE PROMENADE MALL PROMO
001-111-999-5270
475.00
475.00
52761 11/19/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
220.12
220.12
52762 11/19/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS SPECIAL EVENTS ENTERTAINMENT 190-183-999-5370
250.00
250.00
52763 11/19/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITOR[AL PRODUCTS - TCC
190-184-999-5212
64.66
64.66
52764 11/19/98 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS INSTALL VINYL LETTERING @ C.H. 190-182-999-5242
52764 11/19/98 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS INSTALL V[NYL LETTERING @ C.H. 340-199-701-5242
49.31
49.31
98.62
52765 11/19/98 DELUGO, SONJA REFUND: BALLRO{~q DANCING 190-183-4982
40.00
40.00
52766 11/19/98 003068 DILLON CONSULTING ENGIN CONSULTANT MECH SMOKE CTRL SYS 001-162-999-5248
150.00
150.00
52767 11/19/98 001714 DREAM ENGINEERING, INC. REIMBURSABLES:TENNIS COURT LGT 210-190-155-5802
52767 11/19/98 001714 DREAM ENG]NEERING, INC. DESIGN SVS:TENN[S COURT LGHTS 210-190-155-5802
87.34
3,837.50
3,924.84
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
52768 11/19/98 001380 E S
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
TEMP HELP W/E 10/23/98 WILLIAM
TEMP HELP W/E 10/23/98 WILLIAM
TEMP HELP (2)W/E MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 10/23/98 MYERS
TEMP HELP (2)W/E MCLEAN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E HILLBERG
TEMP HELP (2)W/E HILLBERG
TEMP HELP (2)W/E HILLBERG
TEMP HELP W/E 11/06/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP W/E 11/06/98 SERVEN
TEMP HELP W/E 11/06/98 SERVEN
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-171-999-5118
280-199-999-5118
165-199-999-5118
165-199-999-5118
165-199-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
290.40
290.40
198.18
198.18
396.36
1,891.80
1,062.40
309.10
1,399.70
1,441.80
37'3.60
747.20
37'3.60
8,972.72
52769 11/19/98 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 95366-02 DIEGO DR
193-180-999-5240
188.23
188.23
52770 11/19/98 003437 EDWARDS, MARYANN
REIMBURSE:OLD TOWN SCHOOL TOUR 280-199-999-5362
138.59
138.59
52771 11/19/98 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN REFRESHMENTS:PRELUDE TO MALL 001-111-999-5270
974.75
974.75
52772 11/19/98 FALLS, SHERYL A. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
52773 11/19/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 300-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
48.00
41.00
27.00
16.00
60.25
91.00
12.50
19.00
43.00
357.75
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/19/98 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52774 11/19/98 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORTS:VIA PUERTA
52774 11/19/98 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORTS:OAK CLIFF
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
150.00
150.00
300.00
52775
52775
52775
52775
52775
52775
52775
52775
52775
52776
52776
52776
52776
52776
52776
52776
52776
52776
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000184
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
1/19/98 000173
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
909 197-5072:GENERAL USAGE
909/506-1941PTA CD TTACSD
909/506-2626 POLICE DEPT
909 676-0783:GENERAL USAGE
909 676-6243:PALA COMM.PARK
909/699-0590 ALARM LINES
909/699-1370 SVC FOR COP
909/699-2811 GENERAL USAGE
909 699-8632:GENERAL USAGE
8 1/2 X 11 LAMINATION POUCHES
11X 17 LAMINATION POUCHES
3/8 PLASTIC COMB BINDING
5/16 PLASTIC COMB BINDING
3/4 PLASTIC COMB BINDING
11/8 PLASTIC COMB BINDING
7 MIL CLEAR COVERS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5229
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-110-999-5223
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
4,924.79
57.72
315.69
54.65
28.87
58.41
112.86
1,486.54
29.48
230.40
446.60
7.72
12.96
17.50
14.42
69.15
26.73
63,96
7,069.01
889.44
52777
52777
52777
52777
52777
52777
52777
52777
52777
52778
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 000177
11/19/98 002174
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/C.M.
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/C.C.
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/P.M.
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/H.R.
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/B&S
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/POLICE
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/POLICE
VIDEO OF "PRELUDE TO THE MALL"
001-110-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5277
001-140-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-170-999-5220
001-170-999-5242
001-111-999-5270
316.57
282.73
6.30-
88.54
53.71
351.40
16.69
140.55
183.12
150.00
1,427.01
150.00
52779
52780
52781
52781
52782
52783
52784
52785
52786
11/19/98 003342
11/19/98 001697
11/19/98 000186
11/19/98 000186
11/19/98 002372
11/19/98 002409
11/19/98 002098
11/19/98 002166
11/19/98 002695
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
HALL, NANCY LEE
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HARMON, JUDY
HAZ PAK INC.
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
INGRAM ELECTRIC
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
HAZMAT STORAGE SUPPLIES
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR & MAINT.
LOCATE P-LINE CONDUIT @ MUSEUM
OCT PLAN CHECK SERVICES
001-101-999-5267
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5370
190-182-999-5212
190-183-999-5330
001-164-601-5430
001-170-999-5214
210-190-808-5804
001-162-999-5248
2,000.00
256.00
154.90
514.09
381.80
1,136.00
986.43
150.00
140.40
2,000.00
256.00
668.99
381.80
1,136.00
986.43
150.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/19/98 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52786 11/19/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN OCT PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 582.92
52786 11/19/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN OCT PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 243.36
966.68
52787 11/19/98 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY, INC CHRISTMAS BANNERS 280-199-999-5271 139.04
52787 11/19/98 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY, INC BANNER SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5271 78.61
217.65
52788 11/19/98 001405 KIWANIS CLUB OF TEMECUL FY 98-99 CSF GRANT 001-101-999-5267 5,000.00
5,000.00
52789 11/19/98 002187 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 001-172-999-5255 4,533.05
4,533.05
52790 11/19/98 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH WELKS FALL EXCURSION 1998 190-183-999-5350 450.00
450.00
52791 11/19/98 002011 MARTIN, KATHARINA E. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330 338.00 338.00
52792 11/19/98 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 352.80
352.80
52793 11/19/98 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO PROF ENG SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE 210-165-631-5802 17,062.54
17,062.54
52794 11/19/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM TCC NOV COPIER LEASE PMT 190-182-999-5239 162.70
162.70
52795 11/19/98 003476 NACORE INTERNATIONAL, I ADVERTISEMENT-NACORE SYMPOSIUM 001-111-999-5270 3,695.00
3,695.00
52796 11/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 67.21
52796 11/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-163-999-5214 59.35
52796 11/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-604-5214 297.37
52796 11/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214 151.65
575.58
52797 11/19/98 003116 OLDE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE ADVERTISING-OLD TOWN PROMOTION 280-199-999-5362 1,430.00
1,430.00
52798 11/19/98 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. OCT RDA CONSULTANT SERVS
52798 11/19/98 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. OCT LOW/MOD CONSULTANT SERVS
280-199-999-5248 4,109.63
165-199-999-5248 5,910.94
10,020.57
52799 11/19/98 002331 PEP BOYS INC MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 23.13
52799 11/19/98 002331 PEP BOYS INC MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 5.92
29.05
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 001-2130 322.43
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130 11.13
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 22,981.50
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 447.72
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130 3.01
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 3,702.12
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.31
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 34.03
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 412.42
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 114.60
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130 .90
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 219.80
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 129.08
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 723.40
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 142.40
52800 11/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 486.27
VOUCHRE2
11/19/98
14:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
52800 11/19/98 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246
PERS-PRE
PERS-PRE
PERS-PRE
PERS-PRE
PERS-PRE
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
001-2130
191-2130
192-2130
193-2130
194-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
263.61
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
80.08
1.17
14.08
.05
.14
1.54
.61
.69
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
30,167.71
52802 11/19/98 000247 PESTMASTER
WEED ABATEMENT:HWY 79N
001-164-601-5402
4,955.00
4,955.00
52803 11/19/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS
52803 11/19/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS
52803 11/19/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS
52803 11/19/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
001-163-999-5250
001-110-999-5260
001-165-999-5250
001-171-999-5220
14.88
23.71
23.14
15.48
77.21
52804 11/19/98 000254
52804 11/19/98 000254
52804 11/19/98 000254
52804 11/19/98 000254
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-17CSD
PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-07
PUBLIC NOTICE: 98-20
PUBLIC NOTICE: 98-19
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
38.25
34.75
8.50
7.75
89.25
52805 11/19/98 000981 R H F INC.
RADAR EQUIP REPAIR/POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5215
58.00
58.O0
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
52806 11/19/98 000260
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
EMPLOYEE NAME BADGES
EMPLOYEE NAME BADGES
NAMEPLATES FOR PUBLIC WORKS
NAMEPLATE HOLDER
LETTERING FOR CUBICLE NAME
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
001-164-602-5222
001-165-999-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-165-999-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-165-999-5222
9.00
9.00
22.50
10.00
8.40
3.21
1.35
63.46
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
52807 11/19/98 000947
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND HISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND HISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND HISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND HISC SUPPLIES
210-165-697-5804
210-165-605-5804
210-165-673-5802
280-199-824-5804
001-164-604-5268
210-165-683-5804
210-165-673-5804
210-165-604-5804
210-190-154-5804
001-161-999-5222
210-165-604-5801
67.70
29.02
255.53
9.06
27.48
112.43
222.56
1,220.68
288.50
85.63
190.35
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/19/98 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 280-199-824-5804 178.60
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5250 23.00
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 210-190-808-5804 95.62
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 210-190-808-5804 21.04
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C SALES TAX 210-190-808-5804 9.04
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 210-165-604-5804 155.66
52807 11/19/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5250 44.35
3,036.25
52808 11/19/98 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST FIRE HYDRANTS ON MARG RD(MALL) 210-165-681-5804 10,500.00
10,500,00
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 4,378.54
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240 115.06
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240 930.99
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240 219.90
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 177.30
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 3,199.97
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240 406.65
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 699.14
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 1,659.28
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 158.86
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 49.60
52809 1t/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-27924-1 MORENO ROAD 190-180-999-5240 47.41
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-27999-0 MORENO RD-DC 190-180-999-5240 9.96
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 46.84
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 33.98
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST 280-199-807-5801 42.03
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98000-0 PAUBA ROAD 001-171-999-5240 9.96
52809 11/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98010-0 PRKVIEW FIRE 001-171-999-5240 320.95
12,506.42
52810 11/19/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-165-999-5214 6.00
52810 11/19/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-163-999-5214 27.00
52810 11/19/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-163-999-5263 37.45
52810 11/19/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-164-604-5214 10.00
52810 11/19/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 280-199-999-5262 45.00
125.45
52811 11/19/98 RANCHO TEMECULA LIONS C HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR BOOTH 190-183-4992 133.40
133.40
52812 11/19/98 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET OCT PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 185.00
185.00
52813 11/19/98 000266 RIGHTWAY PORTABLE RESTROOMS RENTAL 001-111-999-5270 358.40
52813 11/19/98 000266 RIGHTWAY RIVERTON PARK TOILET RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 62.89
421.29
52814 11/19/98 003072 RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRI 98/99 COMM SERV FUNDING PRGM 001-101-999-5267 2,000.00
2,000.00
52815 11/19/98 000357 RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT 2ND QTR SERV LEVEL FY 98/99 001-164-602-5405 15,717.00
15,717.00
52816 11/19/98 002670 SCHNEIDER-LJUBENKOV, JU TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 384.00
52816 11/19/98 002670 SCHNEIDER-LJUBENKOV, JU TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 509.60
52816 11/19/98 002670 SCHNEIDER-LJUBENKOV, JU TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 365.71
52817 11/19/98 SHINE, VICKI REFUND: HATHA YOGA 190-183-4982 37.00
1,259.31
37.00
VOUCHRE2
11/19/98
14:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
52818
52818
52819
52820
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52821
52822
52822
52822
52822
52822
52823
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
003062 SIGN XPRESS SIGNS FOR"PRELUDE TO THE MALL" 001-111-999-5270
003062 SIGN XPRESS SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270
003326 SITE SELECTION OCT 98 ADVERTISING:OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-17-038-0802 MARG/WINCH CREEK 190-180-999-5240
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-17-214-0428:MEADOWS PARKWAY 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654:VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-13-079-2377:HIGHWAY 79 TC1 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3030:WINCHESTER RD 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3139:WINCHESTER RD TC 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330:RESIDENTAL ST 192-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603:ARTERIAL STLT 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-05-791-8807:VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-317-3968 TEM WEDDING CHPL 190-180-999-5240
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-1353 PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240
11/19/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 021 725 0775 4 SR CTR 190-181-999-5240
11/19/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 101 525 0950 0 TCC 190-184-999-5240
11/19/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 133 040 7373 0 MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5240
11/19/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 095 167 7907 2 FIRE STATION 001-171-999-5240
11/19/98 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 091 024 9300 5 CRC 190-182-999-5240
11/19/98 SPRINGS COMMUNITY CHURC REFUND: SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-4992
52824 1;/19/98 000465
52824 11/19/98 000465
52825 11/19/98 002150
52826 11/19/98 000305
52826 11/19/98 000305
STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN
STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
FIRST AID SUPPLIES - CRC
SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION PRGMS
SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION PRGMS
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-182-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
190-183-999-5320
471.93
36.57
4,360.00
65.33
40.96
160.59
1,886.86
162.21
148.60
178.08
23,783.02
9,163.81
4,767.27
15.26
746.31
44.46
26.29
21.27
83.95
1,385.88
15.00
384.00
236.00
67.20
2.99
145.78
508.50
4,360.00
65.33
41,052.97
1,561.85
15.00
620.00
67.20
148.77
52827 11/19/98 003318 TARTAGL[A, MARIO TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
52827 11/19/98 003318 TARTAGLIA, MARIO TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
52828 11/19/98 000309 TEMECULA COPIERS COPIER REPAIR:STATION 73 001-171-999-5217
440.00
120.00
140.13
56O.0O
140.13
52829 11/19/98 003014 TEMECULA DANCE COMPANY HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR BOOTH 190-183-4992
118.40
118.40
52830 11/19/98
TEMECULA VALLEY ELKS HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR BOOTH 190-183-4992
107.60
107.60
52831 11/19/98 000977 TEMECULA VALLEY SPECIAL 98/99 COMM SERV FUNDING PRGM 001-101-999-5267
52832 11/19/98 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 18" CONES FOR TCSD ACTIVITIES 190-180-999-5301
52832 11/19/98 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SALES TAX 190-180-999-5301
2,500.00
212.50
16.47
2,500.00
228.97
52833 11/19/98 000420 TRAMS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN OCT SERVS:OVRLND & MARG RD PRJ 210-165-681-5802 172.48 172.48
VOUCHRE2
11/19/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52834
52835
52836
52836
52836
52836
52836
52836
52836
52837
52838
52839
52840
52841
52841
52841
52842
52842
52842
52842
52842
52842
52842
14:20
CHECK
DATE
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
1!/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
11/19/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000978
002396
002065
002065
002065
002065
002065
002065
002065
000792
0O3073
003487
003114
000345
000345
000345
002741
002741
002741
002741
002741
002741
002741
VENDOR
NAME
TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO
U S LONG DISTANCE, INC.
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E
VALLEY JUNIOR GOLF ASSO
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WAR
WASKA, CAROLYN
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
ZELLERBACH
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
A MEAD COMP
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1ST QTR:EMERG.RESPONSE PROGRAM
LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER
8 1/2 X 11 20LB. WHITE
8 1/2 X 11LASER
11X 17 LASER
36 X 500 ENGINEERING ROLLS FOR
SALES TAX
13 REAMS OF RED PAPER FOR TCSD
SALES TAX
12/11/98 INLAND EMP ECON BRKFT
98/99 COMM SERV FUNDING PRGM
98/99 COMM SERV FUNDING PRGM
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING
OCT LEASE AGRMNT:5100 COPIER
OCT LEASE AGRMNT:5100 COPIER
OCT LEASE AGRMNT:5100 COPIER
8 1/2 X 11 ASSORTED COLORS
SALES TAX
8 1/2 X 11 gHITE PAPER 20LB.
8 1/2 X 11 ASSORTED COLORS
SALES TAX
8 1/2 X 11 ASSORTED COLORS
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5274
320-199-999-5208
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
001-110-999-5258
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
190-183-999-5330
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,312.50
1,504.04
303.60
120.20
120.20
40.43
45.30
181.09
14.03
200.00
2,500.00
1,700.00
57.60
1,690.84
401.22
27.97
102.00
7.91
1,680.00
813.80
193.29
34.00
2.64
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,312.50
1,504.04
824.85
200.00
2,500.00
1,700.00
57.60
2,120.03
2,833.64
TOTAL CHECKS 333,595.69
VOUCHRE2
11124198
16:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LC~/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - ClP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
61,76~.07
970.08
3,820.65
41.68
2.49
33.17
25.00
12,856.24
83.33
869.48
57.48
233.88
80,757.55
VO~JCHRE2
11/24/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52843
52843
52843
52844
52845
52848
52848
52849
52850
52851
52851
52852
52853
52854
52855
52856
52856
52856
52857
52857
52858
52858
52859
52860
52861
52861
52861
52861
52862
52863
52864
16:36
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/20/98 002185
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98 002541
11/25/98 001159
11/25/98 001159
11/25/98
11/25/98 002106
11/25/98 000684
11/25/98 002708
11/25/98 003347
11/25/98 003347
11/25/98 003347
11/25/98 000184
11/25/98 000184
11/25/98 002141
11/25/98 002141
11/25/98 000963
11/25/98 000193
11/25/98 000194
11/25/98 000194
11/25/98 000194
11/25/98 000194
11/25/98 000199
11/25/98
11/25/98 002779
POSTMASTER - TEMECULA
ANDING, KIMBERLY
ANDING, KIMBERLY
BARRAZA, ADAM
BECKER, WALTER KARL
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
CAMP PENDLETON OFFICERS
DA FAMILY SUPPORT
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY
ESCONDIDO COMMUNITY HEA
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
F ! RST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GEIS, PAUL
GEIS, PAUL
HOGAN, DAVID
ICMA
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
INTERTEC PUBLISHING COR
KUHNS, ALLIE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
POSTAGE:V.R./REDHAWK ANNEX.
REFUND:TUMBLING TOTS/CREAT.BEG
REFUND:TUMBLING TOTS/CREAT.BEG
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
MFG/MODIFY BRACKETS:OT WREATHS
FINGERPRINT PROCESSING
FINGERPRINT PROCESSING
DONATION PER COUNCIL REQUEST
002106 SUPPORT
98 GOV~T TAX SEM B.SMITH 12/3
FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
5477-2590-4249-5288-SJ-NOV
5477-2590-4249-5288-SJ-NOV
5477-2590-4249-5288-SJ-NOV
909-694-4354 NOV PALA COMM PRK
909-695-3564 NOV CITY ALARM
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR -TEM POLICE
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR -TEM POLICE
REIMB:LEAGUE CF 10/29-30
PUBLICATIONS FOR LOCAL GOV'T
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000199 IRS GARN
PUBL:FIRE SVC STANDARDS/PRACT.
RB:BUSINESS CALLS:4/21-10/20
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5307
190-183-4980
190-183-4982
190-2900
280-199-999-5362
001-150-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-101-999-5285
190-2140
001-140-999-5261
001-101-999-5267
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5250
001-120-999-5258
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-161-999-5261
001-110-999-5228
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
001-2140
001-171-999-5228
001-110-999-5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
504.00
30.66
8.75
100.00
306.65
42.00
42.00
50.00
82.50
90.00
5,000.00
72.89
162.21
14.28-
32.24
56.05
340.00
265.00
84.57
44.90
1,245.44
18.76
150.00
6.24
302.51
54.00
76.20
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
504.00
39.41
100.00
306.65
84.00
50.00
82.50
90.00
5,000.00
220.82
88.29
605.00
84.57
44.90
1,420.44
302.51
54.00
76.20
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/24/98 16:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
52865 11/25/98 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:R.ROBERTS:LEAGUE CF:12/1-6 001-100-999-5258 694.00
694.00
52866 11/25/98 003491 MAXIMUM CLEANING CARPET CLEANING:P.D.SUBSTATION 001-170-999-5229 75.00
75.00
52867 11/25/98 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330 336.00 336.00
52868 11/25/98 MIRACLE MILE COIN CENTE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.00
52869 11/25/98 002903 MORRIS, ROBERT D.
5 STEEL INLAYS:OT STREETSCAPE 280-199-824-5804 12,400.00 12,400.00
52870 11/25/98 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:NFPA:WINDSOR 001-171-999-5226 115.00
115.00
52871 11/25/98 NAVARRO, SANDRA REFUND: GROUP GOLF LESSONS 190-183-4982 44.00
44.00
52872 11/25/98 001710 NOVELL, INC. RENEWAL:NOVELL APPNOTES:HAFELI 320-199-999-5228 89.00
89.00
5287'3 11/25/98 003292 PATTISON, WILLIAM B. REIMBURSE:CSMFO CF:11/13-11/15 001-140-999-5258
57.66 57.66
52874 11/25/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 73.84
73.84
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-101-999-5280 51.97
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5278 22.81
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 2.58
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5262 5.00
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5261 5.00
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5222 20.19
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5214 9.36
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5292 7.32
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5242 42.99
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-171-999-5226 15.00
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 167.35
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 34.48
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 22.98
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5260 7.19
52875 11/25/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5362 27.00
441.22
52876 11/25/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 64.50
52876 11/25/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-165-999-5230 10.75
52876 11/25/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 30.00
52876 11/25/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-171-999-5230 10.75
116.00
52877 11/25/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001339-O:KL:OCT 001-100-999-5208 50.45
52877 11/25/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003948-6:INFO SYS:OCT 320-199-999-5208 42.31
92.76
52878 1~,25/98 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:K.SCHUM 165-199-813-5804 750.00
750.00
52879 11/25/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-15-01499-1:WINCH.CREEK PARK 190-180-999-5240 451.82
52879 11/25/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-17-80000-1:VIA EDUARDO LSCP 001-164-601-5250 38.13
489.95
52880 11/25/98 003490 RANCHO MUSIC ASSOCIATIO FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD 001-101-999-5267 3,000.00 3,000.00
VOUCHRE2
11/24/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52881
52881
52881
52882
52883
52884
52884
52885
52886
52887
52887
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52888
52889
52889
52889
52889
52889
52889
52889
52890
52891
52891
52891
52892
52892
52893
16:36
CHECK
DATE
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
1!/25/98
11125/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
11/25/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003492
000537
000537
003074
002578
003366
003366
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000325
000325
000325
000348
VENDOR
NAME
RFA
RFA
RFA
SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
SCTC INSTITUTE
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
TEMECULA VALLEY ROSE SO
TEMEKU HILLS REC, LLC
TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON
TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U.S.L.R.
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
WESTSIDE CITY 1, LLC
WESTSIDE CITY 1, LLC
ZIGLER, GAIL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
OVERPAYMENT:SIGN PERMIT
OVERPAYMENT:SIGN PERMIT
OVERPAYMENT:SIGN PERMIT
TVHS 1998 WINTER SPORTS POSTER
SPORTS TURF MGMT:12/O9:WIECHEC
2-00-397-5059:COMM SERV UTL
2-02-351-6800:VARIOUS METERS
FY98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
FACILITY RENTAL:12/11/98
STREET MAINT:RANCHO CAL/COSMIC
ADD'L ST.MAINT:R. CAL/COSMIC
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
RELEASE SECURITIES:LD97-OO1MP
RELEASE SECURITIES:LD97-003MP
REFRESHMENTS:MALL EVENT:11/04
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2280
001-162-4200
001-162-4285
001-100-999-5250
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
001-101-999-5267
001-150-999-5265
001-164-601-5402
001-164-601-5402
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
190-2900
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
001-2670
001-2670
001-111-999-5270
ITEM
AMOUNT
.87
42.75
57.00
185.00
95.00
54.31
41.68
2,000.00
182.00
4,940.00
435.00
7,163.07
22.73
1,282.72
2.49
33.17
25.00
22.73
83.33
609.78
158.34
722.14
178.09
691.08
86,43
40.10
57.48
75.54
100.00
127.50
.50
27.00
25,500.00
5,287.00
2,400.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.62
185.00
95.00
95.99
2,000.00
182.00
5,375.00
9,403.36
1,850.86
100.00
155.00
30,787.00
2,400.00
TOTAL CHECKS 80,757.55
VOUCHRE2
11/24/98
16:56
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 CENERAL FUND
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
TOTAL
AMOUNT
393,469.79
18#842.53
37,444.46
449~756.78
VOUCHRE2
11/24/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52896
52896
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
52897
16:56
CHECK
DATE
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
001916
001916
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
VENDOR
NAME
ALBERT A.
ALBERT A.
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
WEBB ASSOCIAT
WEBB ASSOCIAT
CO. SHER[FF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHER[FF'S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CO. SHER[FF~S
CO. SHERIFF~S
CO. SHERIFF'S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SEPT PROF SVS:RANCHO/I-15 PRJT
SEP PROF SRVCS-O.T. ST.SCAPE
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
LAW ENFORCEMENT - AUGUST 98
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-165-601-5801
280-199-824-5801
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5289
001-170-999-5291
001-1230
001-170-999-5281
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5279
ITEM
AMOUNT
18,842.53
37,444.46
182 715.12
48.988.20
58.956.80
9.724.00
22.642.90
7.336.80
7.336.80
30.128.26
2.825.60
19.140.64
3.674.67
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
56,286.99
393,469.79
TOTAL CHECKS 449,756.78
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FI~N~E
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Financ~
December 8, 1998
City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1998
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director ~
Jesse Diaz, Accountant ~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receives and files the City Treasurer's Report as of
October 31, 1998.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government
Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of October 31, 1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
1. City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1998
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of October 31,
1998
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of October 31, 1998
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of October ill, 1998
Cash Activity for the Month of October
Cash and Investments as of October 1, 1998
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of October 31, 1998
57,419,044 (1)
2,784,386
(5,305,959)
54,897,471
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/ Contractual/
Termination Market
Type of Investment Institution Yield Date Value
Petty Cash City Hall n/a $ 1,500 $
General Checking Union Bank n/a (387, 157)
Sweep Account Union Bank 4.330 % 1,739,000
(Money Market Account) (Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank n/a 8,499
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.557 % 38,059,053
Certificate of Deposit Community Bank 5.300 % 334,764
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account Grossmont Bank 4.950 % 94,573
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account Union Bank 5.350 % 170,536
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account Union Bank n/a 6,966
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.506 % 3,064,676
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.420 % 9/1/2017 500.000
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.506 % 1,039,301
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts - Measure A U.S. Bank flint Am. Treasury) 4.506 % 1,096,778
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accoants-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank flint Am. Treasury) 4.506 % 17,474
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Bayerische Lundesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 502,690
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.506 % 5,668,429
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920
(Investment Agreement)
$
Par/Book
Balance
1,500
(387,157) (2)
1,739,000
8.499 (2)
38,059,053 (3)
334,764
94,573
170,536
6.966
3,064,676
1,531,469
500,000
1,039,301
1,096,778
17,474
502,690
5,668.429
1,448,920
54,897,471
(1)- In accordance with GASB No. 32, the City will not report Deferred Compensation Plans and has restated last months ending balance by $1,406,662.
(2)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(3)-At October 31, 1998 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $32,102,483,056.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $38,594,087.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of October .31, 1998
City (1)
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 35A83,243
Receivables 4,397,359
Due from other funds 748,756
Land held for resale
Prepaid assets 47,337
Deposits 523,524
Fixed assets-net 900,933
Total assets $ 41,801,152
Services
District
$ 1,442,019
460,536
27,012
$ 1,929,567
Redevelopment
Agency
11,927,951
1,131,421
1,457,505
2,220,303
16,737,180
Community
Facilities
Districts (2)
Total
$ 6,344,258 $ 54.897,471
5,989,316
2,233.273
2,220,303
47,337
1,124,300 1,647.824
900,933
$ 7,468,558
$ 67,93&457
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 577,648
Other liabilities 6,494,885
27,012
118,085
1,457,505 $ 171,108
1,672,801 3,161,526
$ 2,233,273
11,447,297
Total liabilities 7,072,533 145,097 3,130,306 3,332,634 13,680,570
1,127,622
719,830
(62,982)
1,784,470
1,929,567
Fund ~ quity:
Contributed capital 1,281,781
Retained earnings 851,180
Fund balances:
Reserved (3) 7,713,331
Designated (3) 22,629,411
Undesignated 2,252,916
9,215,019
4,391,855
13,606,874
16,737,180 $
1,124,300
3,011,624
4,135,924
7,468,558
Total fund equity 34,728, 619
Total liabilities and fund equity $ 41,801,152
1,281,781
851,180
19,180,272
30,752,720
2,189,934
54,255,887
$ 67,936,457
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and other special revenue funds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills).
(3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages.
ITEM 4
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 13, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at west side of Second and Front Streets
(APN 922-46-022 and 922-07-024). The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Temecula and Cleveland Investment Co., William E. and Margaret Fortner.
2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) with respect to 3 matters of existing litigation involving the City and/or the
Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: Skytech vs. City of Temecula,
Outdoor Media Group ('OMG) vs. City of Temecula, and City of Temecula vs. KR Palm
Plaza.
3. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning leasing of real property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. The negotiating
parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Norm Reeves Honda,
Donna L. Reeves Trust. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment to the real
property interests proposed to be conveyed.
4. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to each matter,
the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant
exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the Agency based on existing facts and
circumstances.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberrs.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Jordan Bellino.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Randy R. Johnson of Temecula United Methodist Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Stone.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Canine Promotion - Ser.qeant Mitch AIm
Sergeant AIm updated the City Council on the Canine Program; briefly reviewed its patrol
functions; and introduced Deputy Joseph Nardone who, in turn, introduced "Hunter' to the
City Council.
Certificate of Appreciation to Dick Ritz - T.A.G. Program Coordinator
On behalf of all the T.A.G. Members, Program Coordinator Ritz, with appreciation, accepted
the Certificate.
Proclamation for California Pharmacy Week
Mayor Roberts presented the proclamation to Councilman Stone.
Proclamation for Red Ribbon Week
Commenting on the importance of Red Ribbon Week, Mr. Gary Wilson accepted the
proclamation.
Special Achievement Award to Dale Qualm - Lieutenant Governor for District 6 of the
Kiwanas Club of Temecula - Murrieta
Mayor Pro Tem Ford presented this Special Achievement Award which was respectfully
accepted by Mr. Dale Qualm.
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reportin.q
Commending the Finance Department on the receipt of several of these awards, City
Manager Bradley presented the Certificate to Finance Director Roberts.
Council for Urban Economic Development Tourism Brochure Award
Commending staff and all those individuals responsible for obtaining this award, Mayor Pro Tem
Ford presented this award to the City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Mr. Bob Lopshire, 40244 Atmore Court, relayed his safety concerns to the Council with
regard to the lack of sidewalks near Nicolas Valley Elementary School.
Although the area of discussion is not within City limits, Councilman Stone advised that,
last year, the City Council recognized the existing safety concern and concurred to split the
associated cost of this project three ways -- the County, the School District, and the City. Mr.
Stone requested that a status report with regard to this issue be presented at the next City
Council meeting.
Due to modifications to the initial plan in order to address the existing drainage issues,
City Manager Bradley advised that the bid of $85,000 would be split among the City, the
County, and the School District and that an additional City appropriation of $21,000 would be
necessary.
B. Mr. Jason Bodlak and Ms. Yvette Zambrano, Rancho Vista High School representatives,
invited the Councilmembers and the viewing audience to the upcoming Third Annual Drug Free
5K on Saturday, October 24, 1998, at 9:00 A.M,
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Councilman Stone thanked Cub Pack No. 301 - the Wolverines - for their recent visit to
City Hall.
B. Advising that the Temeku Hills Park Subcommittee (comprised of Councilmembers
Lindemans and Stone) had met with the concerned residents, Councilman Stone, echoed by
Councilman Lindemans, reviewed the Subcommittee's proposed recommendations:
· Construct Temeku Hills Park, as specified in the Specific Plan, without
ballfield lighting;
· Explore the feasibility of the developer installing lights on other ballfields
within the City;
· Identify possible sites for a large sports complex - not near residential areas;
· Explore with the developer the feasibility of completing construction of
Meadows Parkway as soon as possible.
C. Having attended the 1 O0th Anniversary of the League of California Cities Conference in
Long Beach, Councilman Comerchero apprised the viewing audience as well as the Council of
the League's decision to form a new and completely separate organization -- Action for Better
Cities (ABC). Because this organization will be funded through private and corporate donations,
Mr. Comerchero noted that this organization will be able to lobby, in Sacramento, on behalf of
the cities.
D. Having attended the thirteenth Crime Free Multi-Housing Awards ceremony at the Oak
Tree Apartments, Mayor Pro Tem Ford commended the apartment managers and management
companies for their contribution of time and effort in to order make this program the success it
is.
E. Mayor Pro Tem Ford encouraged the public to attend the upcoming Make-A-Difference
Day on Saturday, October 24, 1998, from 7:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M.
F. Mayor Roberts relayed his delight with having had the opportunity to provide a City Hall
tour to 45 students from the Learning Center.
G. Mayor Roberts advised that discussions are ensuing with the members of the Pechanga
Council with regard to road improvements on Pala Road.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2 ADDroval of Minutes
RECOM M E N DATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 8, 1998;
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 22, 1998;
Mayor Roberts abstained with regard to the approval of the September 22,
1998, City Council minutes.
2.3 Approve the minutes of September 29, 1998.
3 Resolution ADI3rovin.cl List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 Citv Treasurer's Report as of Au.qust 31, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1998.
5 Records Destruction ADI3roval
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with
the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
4
9
6 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June
30, 1998.
7 Contract Inspection Services for Buildin.q and Safety
RECOM MEN DATION:
7.1 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with P & D Consultants in an
amount not to exceed sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) to provide
supplemental building inspection services to the Building and Safety
Department.
8 Approve Metricom, Inc. Attachment Permit A.qreement for Wireless Diqital
Communications Network
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
ATTACHMENT PERMIT AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND METRICOM,
INC.
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation at Pala Road at
Rainbow Canyon Road - Project No. PW97-27
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-
year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
9.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
10 All-Way Stop - Amarita Way and Via Rami
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
5
RESOLUTION NO. 98-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP
INTERSECTION AT AMARITA WAY AND VIA RAMI
11
12
Accept Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-1 (located
northwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-1;
11.2
Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten
percent (10%) warranty amount and initiation of the one-year (1) warranty
period;
11.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
Accept Public Improvements for interior streets in Tract No. 23371-2 (located
northwesterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Accept Public Improvements for interior streets in Tract No. 23371-2;
12.2
Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten
percent (10%) warranty amount, and initiation of the one-year (1) warranty
period;
12.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
13 Acceptance of Grant of Easement of Tract No. 28553-1, PA98-0125 (Carleton Way
and Windwood Circle)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE
OFFER OF DEDICATION GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS PURPOSES FOR
TRACT 28553-1, PA98-0125 BUT NOT ACCEPTING
THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
14 Approve Revision to Standard Drawings for Public Works Construction
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 98-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS
AND CHANGES TO THE STANDARD DRAWINGS
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 9'1-43,
AS AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE NO. 93-04 WHICH
PROVIDES FOR MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES BY
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
15 Authorization to Solicit for Construction Bids for the Pala Road Brid.qe - Project No.
PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit for construction bids for
the Pala Road Bridge - Project No. PW97-15,
16 Authorization to Solicit for Construction Bids for Mall Improvements for Overland
Drive Extension - Ynez Road to Mar.qarita Road, Mar.qarita Road Widenin.q -
Winchester Road to Solana Way - Project No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit for construction bids for
Mall Improvements for Overland Drive Extension - Ynez Road to Margarita
Road, Margarita Road Widening - Winchester Road to Solana Way.
17 Authorization to Solicit Public Construction Bids for Overland Drive Freeway
Overcrossin.q at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids
for the Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15 subject to
approval by Caltrans,
Consent Calendar Item No. '17 was pulled for separate discussion; see pages
8-9.
7
18
Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates for
the Old Town Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05 and Front Street Widenin.q
Proiect - Project No. PW98-06
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Approve an amendment to our Professional Services Agreement with Albert
A. Webb Associates to make design changes along Front Street from
Moreno Road to Rancho California Road - Project No. PW97-05 - and
PW98-06 Front Street Widening Project in the amount of $18, 190.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
18.2 Approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $1,819.00
which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this issue.
19 Plannin.q Application No. PA98-0235 ('Adoption of a Resolution Approving the
Transfer of Property Tax between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside
for Assessor's Parcel No. 911-140-007)
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TAX BETWEEN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
UPON THE DETACHMENT OF PROPERTY NEAR THE
INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS AND
WINCHESTER ROADS WITH AN ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER OF 911-140-007
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 16 and
18 - 19. The was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval with Councilman Stone abstaining with regard to Item No. 18.
(Item No. 17 was pulled; see below.)
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 17
17
Authorization to Solicit Public Construction Bids for Overland Drive Freeway
Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids
for the Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15 subject to
approval by Caltrans.
Councilman Stone, echoed by Councilman Lindemans, relayed his desire to parallel the
construction of the Overland Overcrossing with the construction of the Mall and noted
that a bid alternative with regard to accelerated time schedules should be included to
ensure completion of the Overcrossing on or before October 27, 1998.
For the viewing audience, a rendering of the Overland Overcrossing was presented.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to concur with the staff recommendation with
the addition of a bid alternative with regard to accelerated time schedules. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 8:01 P.M., Mayor Roberts called a short recess. At 8:16 P.M. the City Council
convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency. At 8:26 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled
City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
20 Adoption of Zonin.cl Regulations and Licensin.cl of Adult Businesses
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Find that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Ordinance may
have a significant effect on the environment and adopt the Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for the
proposed Ordinance
20.2 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-18
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE
ZONING REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT
BUSINESSES MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH REGULATIONS
20.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING
REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT
BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH
REGULATIONS
Community Development Director Thornhill presented the staff report (as per agenda
material), advising that the proposed zoning regulations will regulate, through a
9
Conditional Use Permit process, adult businesses; that prior to 1996, the City had no
regulations governing these uses; and that since 1996, the City has been operating with
an interim Ordinance which will expire in two days. By way of overheads, Mr. Thornhill
reviewed the originally proposed Adult Business Overlay to the proposed Overlay.
City Attorney Thorson further addressed the staff report (of record) in particular the
Summary of Legal Issues Affecting Regulation of Adult Businesses, Summary of Terms
of Proposed Adult Business Ordinance, and Available Parcels for Adult Businesses.
Mr. Thorson noted that if the proposed Ordinance were adopted, a property owner will
continue to retain the same rights of refusal to rent. With regard to the differences
between the interim Ordinance and the proposed Ordinance, Mr. Thorson advised that
although they are quite similar, the proposed Ordinance would permit fewer available
sites of such businesses.
In response to Councilman Stone, City Attorney Thorson advised that, as per the
California Courts, the City may not impose fees to an adult business owner ~in order to
recover costs of additionally needed police services as a result of such a business,
noting that, as per California statutes, such costs are only recoverable with regard to an
alcohol-related accident. Since each adult business permit will require the compliance
with CEQA, Mr. Thorson advised that specific concerns may be addressed through the
permit renewal process. For the Councilmembers, Mr. Thorson clarified that the
proposed Ordinance is the compilation of several cities' ordinances such as Irvine and
Mission Viejo.
In addition to the applicant of an adult business being required to proceed with the
Conditional Use Permit process and a public hearing, Councilman Lindemans requested
that the applicant be required to post a Performance Bond with the Police Department in
order to cover the additional Police protection costs necessary as a result of such a
business.
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
Although understanding the need for such an Ordinance, Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena
Street, stated that, in his opinion, adult businesses create undesirable elements and,
therefore, relayed his opposition to such businesses.
Mr. David Micheal, 30300 Churchill Court, suggested, echoed by Mayor Roberts and
Councilman Stone, the installation of a security system which would visually record and
monitor interior and parking lot area activities.
Mr. James Field, 41651 Chablis Court, Pastor of First Baptist Church, relayed his
opposition to such businesses in this community.
There being no additional input, Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing.
Commenting on the difficulty of this issue, Councilman Stone relayed his concern with
regard to the Overlay as it relates to Jefferson Avenue as well as the Mall. Having
reviewed the proposed Ordinance and understanding the need for it, Mr. Stone
reluctantly spoke in support of the Ordinance with the added condition that a security
cameras be installed.
10
Viewing the proposed Ordinance as strengthening tool of the existing interim Ordinance,
Mayor Pro Tem Ford spoke in support of the Ordinance.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ford, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council
may impose a condition requiring the installation and maintenance of video cameras to
monitor interior and parking lot area activities and that existing provisions provide the
Council the authority to view these video tapes.
Opposing the proposed Overlay Zone near the freeway, Councilman Lindemans spoke
in support of the Ordinance with the imposition of a condition requiring the applicant to
post a $50,000 security bond and requested that the issue be split into two separate
motions.
Commending the City Attorney on his efforts associated with the formulation of this
Ordinance, Mayor Roberts spoke in support of the Ordinance with the addition that
security cameras be required.
Because the proposed Ordinance will actually increase the restrictions imposed on adult
businesses and decrease the number of available sites, Councilman Stone stated that
the proposed Ordinance will regulate such uses not permit them and, therefore, spoke in
support of the Ordinance.
City Attorney Thorson reiterated and clarified that the proposed condition with regard to
security cameras will be reflected under the following Sections of the Code: 5.09.012
(Y), 5.09.016 (I), and 5.09.018 (H) and will read as follows: The Adult Business shall
install and maintain security cameras to monitor activities in the interior and on the
parking lot and areas surrounding the building. The Adult Business shall maintain tapes
for 30 days and the equipment shaft be maintained in good working order.
City Attorney Thorson read by title only both the Urgency Ordinance as well as
Ordinance No. 98-19.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adopt the Urgency Ordinance as amended to
include a condition regarding security cameras. The motion was seconded by Mayor
Pro Tem Ford. (This motion ultimately passed; see below.)
In response to the proposed motion, Councilman Lindemans reiterated his opposition
with the proposed Overlay Zone and offered the following substitute motion:
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to concur with the staff
recommendation but to delete the proposed Overlay Zone. Due to the lack of a
second, this motion failed.
At this time, voice vote on the originally made motion reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to concur with staff recommendation 20.1. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
11
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce and read by title only Ordinance No,
98-19. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
In closing, Councilman Lindemans requested that City Attorney Thorson further research
the possibility of requiring the applicant of an adult business to post a security bond.
At this time, Agenda Item Nos. 26 and 27 were considered out of order.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
26 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment
RECOM MEN DATION:
26.1 Appoint two applicants to serve on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for
a full three-year term through October 10, 2001.
Mayor Roberts briefly reviewed the staff report (of record).
MOTION: Mayor Roberts moved to appoint Darrell Connerton and Maryann Edwards.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
27 Community Services Commission Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Appoint two applicants to serve on the Community Services Commission for a full three-year term through October 10, 2001.
Councilman Stone briefly reviewed the staff report (of record).
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to reappoint Jack Henz. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
The City Council continued with regular agenda order.
At this time, Councilman Lindemans departed the meeting.
21 Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Oral report from staff on status of annexation process, concerns of taxing
entities, and revisions to public hearing schedules.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Community Development Director Thornhill presented the staff report (as per agenda
material), advising of the upcoming LAFCO hearing on Thursday, October 22, 1998, at
9:00A.M.
12
City Manager Bradley noted that Assessment District No. 159 will continue to exist and
function whether or not the annexation is approved.
Community Services Director Parker briefly reviewed the proposed changes in the
assessments for Redhawk and Vail Ranch.
Councilman Stone encouraged staff to exhaust all possibilities to further reduce the
proposed City assessment fees.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to receive and file the report. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Ford who abstained and Councilman Lindemans who
was absent.
22 Economic Development Corporation (EDC) FY 1998~99 Fundin.q Re.quest-
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Approve a contract with the Southwest Riverside County Economic
Development Corporation which provides interim funding for FY 1998-99 in
the amount of $45,000.
Assistant City Manager O'Grady presented the staff report (as per agenda material),
advising that the Economic Development Corporation is expanding to include the cities
of Murrieta and Lake Elsinore and that, therefore, programs and budgets are being
updated to support this expansion.
Mayor Roberts briefly provided information with regard to funding contributions by the
City of Murrieta, the City of Lake Elsinore, and the County.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to concur with the staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Councilman Lindemans who was absent.
23 A.qreement for Inspection Services with Riverside County
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Approve an Agreement for inspection services between the City of Temecula
and Riverside County.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Chief Building Official Elmo reviewed the staff report (of record), advising that the City
currently has two contract inspectors and that two additional inspectors will begin on
November 1, 1998. Mr. Elmo noted that by contracting out for additional inspectors, it
will provide staff with the flexibility to utilize these individuals on an as needed basis.
13
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved concur with the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the excel3tion of Mayor Pro Tern Ford who abstained and Councilman Lindemans
who was absent.
24 Amend Existin.a Ordinance for Temecula Municipal Code 15.04 and 15.16 - Address
Numberin.a Sizes in Old Town
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTIONS 15.04 AND
15.16 FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECONCILING
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS AND
ESTABLISHING PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
STANDARDS WITHIN THE TOURIST RETAIL CORE OF
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
Highlighting the proposed amendments, Plans Examiner Berg reviewed the staff report
(as per agenda material).
City Attorney Thorson read Ordinance No. 98-20 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to concur with the staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Councilman Lindemans who was absent.
25 Designation of Votin.cl Dele.aate for the National League of Cities Annual Con.clress
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Designate a voting representative and an alternate.
After a brief discussion, the following motion was offered:
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to designate Mayor Roberts as the voting
representative and Mayor Pro Tem Ford as the alternate. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the excel~tion of
Councilman Lindemans who was absent.
26 Public/Traffic Safety Commission ADDointment
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Appoint two applicants to serve on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for
a full three-year term through October 10, 2001.
14
Discussed earlier; see page 12.
27 Community Services Commission Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Appoint two applicants to serve on the Community Services Commission for
a full three-year term through October 10, 2001.
Discussed earlier; see page 12.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With regard to Closed Session Item No. 1 (real property), City Attorney Thorson advised
that the City Council provided direction to staff; with regard to Item No. 2 (existing
litigation), Mr. Thorson advised that the City Council provided direction to him; with
regard to Item No. 3 (real property), Mr. Thorson advised that the Agency Board gave
direction to staff; and with regard to Item No. 4 (potential litigation), Mr. Thorson advised
that City Council provided direction to him.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:02 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
October 27, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
15
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 27, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition or leasing of real property located at 41953 Main
Street, Temecula. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula and Dual Development. Under negotiation are the price and terms
of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired.
2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a) with respect to 3 matters of existing litigation involving the City
and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: 1) OMG vs. City
of Temecula; 2) Alameda vs, City of Los Angeles (Amicus Brief Participation); and 3)
KR Palm Plaza.
3. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to
each matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where
there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the Agency based
on existing facts and circumstances.
4, Consideration of appointment for the position of City Manager pursuant to the
provisions of Government Code Section 54957.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberts.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Katie Welsh.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Alan Pickering of Southwest Christian Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
GTE Update -AI Sabsevitz, Public Affairs Manager
Mr. AI Sabsevitz, Public Affairs Manager for GTE, presented an overview of those services
provided by GTE; commented on the GTE/Bell Atlantic merger; and reviewed preparations
undertaken by GTE to prepare for the year 2000.
Certificate of Appreciation for Knox Johnson
A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to and accepted by Mr. Knox Johnson for his
contributions to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Certificate of Appreciation for Ron Perry
A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to and accepted by Mr. Ron Perry for his
contributions to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Certificate of Appreciation for Bob Morris
A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to and accepted by Mr. Robert Morris for his
contributions to the Old Town Local Review Board.
Certificate of Appreciation for Vylani AIImon
A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to and accepted by her daughter for her exemplary
work and sincere commitment to the quality of life for families in Temecula.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Ms. Christy Strausbaugh, 31375 Cala Carrasco, expressed her concern with regard to
recent Old Town expenditures - the City's purchase of a condemned building, the construction
of two archways, and the painted mural. Ms. Strausbaugh as well questioned the potential
conflict with Councilman Lindemans voting on Old Town issues considering his wife has a
business in Old Town.
In response to Ms. Strausbaugh comment with regard to Councilman Lindemans, City
Attorney Thorson advised that it has been determined that because Mrs. Lindemans is on a
short-term lease and does not own the building and does not have a tourist-related business,
there would be no conflict of interest on Mr. Lindemans' part to vote on Old Town issues.
City Manager Bradley further clarified the use of Redevelopment funds, noting that such
funds are restricted, by law, to be spent within a Redevelopment area; and noted that
Redevelopment funds are an extension of State Government, advising that the Redevelopment
Agency is a subsidy from all taxpayers in the State of California. With regard to the Mercantile
Building, Mr. Bradley noted that because there are several competing uses, no specific use has
been identified.
Reiterating his objection to the installation of ballfield lights at the Temeku park site, Mr. David
Mathewson, 31293 Durney Court, commended Councilmembers Lindemans and Stone on their
2
receipt of the Rose Award for serving on the Subcommittee which was formed in an effort to
address the residents' concerns.
Having met with Lennar and McMillan, Councilman Stone relayed their interest in working with
the City in order to expedite the extension of Meadows Parkway, noting that additional
information would be provided at the November 10, 1998, City Council meeting.
B. Ms. Diane Bingham, 41417 Avenida De La Reina, relayed her interest to access and
utilize the Wedding Chapel in order to perform services and weddings.
Community Services Director Parker informed the City Council that he had informed Ms.
Bingham of an existing agreement with the Museum which will expire March 15, 1999, and that
weddings have been scheduled up to that time.
Councilman Stone offered to meet with Ms. Bingham and Community Services Director
Parker in an effort to resolve her concerns.
C. Mr. Ron Perry, 44550 La Paz Road, relayed his concerns with regard to traffic issues
throughout the City which remain unresolved and offered the following recommendations:
· That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission be required to review any plans
which could potentially affect traffic in the City;
· That the City adopt a proactive stance with regard to the traffic situation in the
City;
· To complete four to six lanes of traffic on Margarita Road from City limit to
City limit - eliminating all stop signs and installing traffic signals as warrants
and/or safety dictates;
· To complete four lanes of traffic on Ynez Road/De Portola Road from City
limit to City limit - eliminating all stop signs and installing traffic signals where
warrants and/or safety dictates;
· To expedite the building of the Overland Overpass and to quickly complete
the Jefferson Avenue Corridor Study and to take the necessary actions to
increase traffic flow and safety in that area - with the exception of the
Overland Drive Overpass and perhaps the widening of Ynez Road (south of
Oscar's), noting that these improvements are relatively low-cost
improvements.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Councilman Comerchero advised that the Cultural Arts Master Plan Committee has
reviewed the first draft and has forwarded comments to the consultant for additional information.
Concurring with Mr. Perry's comment for the City to take a more proactive stance,
Councilman Comerchero commended Mr. Perry for his service to the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission.
B. Mayor Pro Tem Ford thanked staff and all the volunteers for their efforts and hard work
associated with Make-A-Difference Day on Saturday, October 24, 1998.
3
Concurring with Mr. Perry's comments, Mayor Pro Tem Ford as well commended Mr.
Perry for his service to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
C. In light of all the on-going and upcoming improvements, Councilman Stone, although
concurring with the majority of Mr. Perry's comments, noted that the City has been and will
continue to take a proactive approach with regard to traffic issues.
D. Councilman Lindemans expressed appreciation to Mr. Perry for his commitment to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission and requested that Public Works Director Kicak agendize Mr.
Perry's concerns at a future workshop meeting.
E. Mayor Roberrs thanked the third and fourth graders from the Learning Center for their
recent visit to City Hall.
Having attended the October 14, 1998, Riverside County Transportation Committee
meeting, Mayor Roberts commented on how recent SB 45 funding will further prioritize City
improvements.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATON:
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
3 City of Temecula - Riverside County Library A.clreement
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Execute an agreement with the County of Riverside regarding the disposition
of the Temecula Library upon the payment to the City of Murrieta a sum of
approximately $240,000 in library mitigation fees.
4
6
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Si.qnal Installation at Rancho California
Road at Meadows Parkway - Project No. PW97-23
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-
year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
4.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
5 Foundations and Masonry Contract for the Old Town Entry Archways - Project No.
PW97-05
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Award a contract for the foundations and masonry work for the Old Town
Gateway Arch entry monuments to Larry Donald Masonry, Winchester,
California, in the amount of $68,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute
the contract;
5.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $6,800.00, which is equal to 10% of the
recommended agreement amount.
Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this issue.
Overland Drive Freeway Overcrossing Improvements, Work Authorization
A.qreement for the cost of Relocatin.q Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
Transmission and Distribution Overhead Facilities - Project No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the Interagency Agreement with Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) for relocating overhead facilities for the Overland Drive
Freeway Overcrossing - Project No. PW95-11 - and authorize the Mayor to
execute documents;
6.2 Authorize payment to SCE for facilities relocations in the amount of
$770,843.98.
5
9
Authorization to Solicit for Construction Bids for the Promenade Mall Improvements
for Ynez Road - Winchester Road to Overland Drive and Winchester Road - Ynez
Road to Mar.qarita Road - Project No. PW97-06
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public
Works to solicit for construction bids for the Promenade Mall Improvements
for Ynez Road - Winchester Road to Overland Drive and Winchester Road -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road - Project No. PW97-08.
8 Consent to Record an Irrevocable Grant of Easement for Lot 40 of Tract 3334
10
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION
OF AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES
FOR LOT 40 OF TRACT 3334 FOR PURPOSES OF
RECORDATION BUT NOT ACCEPTING THIS
DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
Tract Map No. 28553-1 (located south of North General Kearnev Road along
Mar.qarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Tract Map No. 28553-1 in conformance with the Conditions of
Approval;
9.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
9.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as
security for the agreements.
Release Labor and Materials security for Public Improvements in Parcel Map No.
24085-1 (located northwesterly of the intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive -
Avenida de Ventas)
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials security for public
improvements in Parcel Map No. 24085-1;
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
11 Tract Map No. 28503 (located adjacent to and east of Rancho Elementary School
north of La Serena Way between Meadows Parkway and Butterfield Sta.qe Road
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 28503 in conformance with the Conditions of
Approval;
11.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
11.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as
security for the agreements.
12 Construction Contract for the Completion of the Temecula Museum Buildin.q
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACITTO
CONSTRUCTION IN AN AMOUNT OF $212,275.06 FOR
THE COMPLETION OF THE MUSEUM BUILDING AT
SAM HICKS PARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
12.2 Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,227.51;
12.3 Appropriate $143,532.00 to Capital Improvement Fund 210-190-808-5804
from General Fund reserves for the completion of the project.
Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this issue.
13 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-19
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
7
ORDINANCE NO. 98-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING
REGULATION AND LICENSING OF ADULT
BUSINESSES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE NEED FOR SUCH
REGULATIONS
14 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-20
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTIONS 15.04 AND
15.16 FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECONCILING
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS AND
ESTABLISHING PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
STANDARDS WITHIN THE TOURIST RETAIL CORE OF
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
With regard to Consent Calendar Item Nos. 6 and 7, Mayor Pro Tem Ford suggested
that these contracts be incentive contracts to ensure that all work is completed at the
proper time.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 14.
The was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with Councilman Stone abstainin.q with regard to Item Nos. 5 and 12.
At 8:0'1 P.M., Mayor Roberts called a short recess. At 8:17 P.M. the City Council
convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency. At 8:21 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled
City Council business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15
Contract Agreement for Walkway Construction to Nicolas Valley ElementaN School
between the City of Temecula, Riverside County Economic Development A.qencV,
and the Temecula Valley Unified School District
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement after review and
approval by the City Attorney;
8
15.2 Appropriate from the General Fund Reserves $29,000.00 for the City's
portion of the walkway constructions costs;
15.3 Authorize payment of one-third (1/3) of the construction cost not to exceed
$29,000.00 for the walkway construction.
Reviewing the staff report (of record), Public Works Director Kicak advised that although
the School District has taken no action with regard to this issue, the County Board of
Supervisors have approved it. It was requested by the City Council that a letter be sent
to School District requesting that this matter be agendized to ensure the matter could be
resolved in a timely fashion.
Councilman Lindemans suggested that a letter be sent to Mr. Bob Lopshire, thanking
him for readdressing this issue with the Council and to apprise him of the Council's
action.
If approved by the School District, Public Works Director Kicak advised that once the bid
is awarded, the project should be completed within a three-month period. Mayor
Roberts noted that this timeframe would be unacceptable.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation with the
addition that a letter be sent to Mr. Bob Lopshire and to the School Board requesting that
this matter be expedited. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
16 1998-99 Community Service Funding Request Recommendations
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Review and approve the 1998°99 Community Service Funding requests per
the table outlining the committee's recommendations to 25 organizations
totaling $81,200.
Councilman Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to Escondido
Community Health Center and Mayor Roberts noted that he would be abstaining with
regard to Alternative to Domestic Violence.
Finance Director Roberts presented the staff report (as per agenda material); briefly
received the proposed funding recommendations; and advised that the Committee is
recommending that the remaining balance of the Community Services Funding Budget
of $73,800 be made available for a Spring funding application process. Although the
City, in the past, has not had two application processes, Ms. Roberts advised that by
doing so, it would enable those organization that did not have the opportunity to apply for
this funding process.
Councilman Comerchero briefly reviewed the funding review process.
Commenting on the difficulty of making these funding recommendations, Councilman
Lindemans commended Councilmembers Comerchero and Stone on a job well done.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation with the
modification of a second funding phase in the Spring. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Mayor Roberts who abstained with regard to Alternatives to Domestic Violence and
Councilman Stone who abstained with regard to Escondido Community Health Center.
17 Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Oral report from staff on status of annexation process, concerns of taxing
entities, and revisions to public hearing schedules.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Community Development Director Thornhill provided a status report with regard to the
proposed Redhawk/Vail Ranch annexation; advised that at the October 22, 1998, LAFCO
meeting, several issues could not be resolved which resulted in a continuance to December
10, 1998; and noted that due to this continuation, the November 30,1998, City Council
meeting with regard to annexation will be canceled and that this continuation will postpone
the targeted election date of March 1999 to June and possibly to November 1999. Mr.
Thornhill noted that staff will explore the possibility of splitting the vote between Vail Ranch
and Redhawk and that staff will work with the County with regard to maintenance and
operations associated with the Vail Ranch buildings and Assessment District No. 159.
City Attorney Thorson advised that the City does not have the authority to call for the Tax
Election or to hold a protest hearing on the annexation until LAFCO has adopted the
resolution approving the annexation.
Mr. Thornhill noted that a letter will be sent to the residents, updating them of the situation.
It was the consensus of the City Council to receive and file this report with Mayor Pro Tem
Ford abstaining.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
As per written material, no additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council has authorized him to join with
numerous other cities in California in supporting the position of the City of Los Angeles in
the case of Alameda vs. the City of Los Angeles, noting that this action will be at no cost
to the City. Mr. Thorson noted that the City Council also provided direction with regard
to litigation matters.
10
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:40 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
November 10, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
11
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3, 1998
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and
Roberts.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Ford.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 WorkshoO Discussion on City Council Priorities
City Manager Bradley advised that staff, at City Council direction, has compiled a
comprehensive project list; requested that City Council review this list after which additional
items could be added to the list; requested that Council denote those projects which should be
tracked on a regular basis; noted that a pared-down list would be created, which would be
updated, by staff, on a regular basis. Mr. Bradley advised that an additional three-page list has
been compiled but because these topics relate to property acquisition, contract negotiations,
etc., they would be discussed in Closed Session.
At this time, an open-discussion period followed during which the following issues were raised:
ITEMS OF CONCERN
Schedule at least two Strategic Planning meetings a year in addition to the Capital
Improvement Projects and planning process meeting; City Council consensus was
obtained;
· Need to set short-, middle-, and long-term goals; long-term goals ranging from five to ten
years;
Improve public dissemination of traffic and circulation issues; utilize the upcoming Traffic
News; with regard to interconnect/signal synchronization, clarify that the City does not
control Ynez Road or Front/Jefferson Avenue or the freeway signals;
In response to a suggestion to train City staff or contract out services with regard to signal
problems, Public Works Director Kicak advised that although to no avail, staff has attempted
to obtain permission from Caltrans to work on the controllers;
It was noted that additional arterials are necessary on the periphery limits - Butterfield
Stage and Western Bypass Corridor;
Public Works Director Kicak noted that the traffic signal at Rancho California Road
interchange will be relocated as a result of the bridge widening and the interconnect and,
therefore, will be down from seven to ten days, advising that Main Street will be open;
It was requested that the City along with other agencies (League of California Cities,
Riverside County Transportation Committee (RCTC), California Contract Cities) work with
Caltrans with regard to signal synchronization.
SHORT-TERM ISSUES
· Overland Bridge to be completed prior to the Mall opening in October 15, 1999;
Rancho California Road - southbound off-ramp (Empire Creek Culvert extension) -
under engineering; Mr. Kicak advised that the first phase of the study will provide
information relative to the required flow under the bridge and once that is determined,
able to proceed with the lane design;
Mayor Pro Tem Ford suggested to design the project as south of Empire Creek and to
utilize the Empire Creek as Phase 2 in order to expedite the project;
Mr. Kicak noted that in order to widen the off-ramp from Rancho California Road north to
the Empire Creek, staff would pursue Mayor Pro Tem Ford's suggestion.
It was the consensus of the City Council to proceed as such.
Highway 79 Missing Link - contract was signed with the County five months ago; Public
Works Director Kicak noted that the Pala Road Project was coordinated with the
Highway 79 South design. Project will be under construction in mid March 1999.
It was the consensus of the City Council to proceed with this project as
expeditiously as possible.
With regard to the Pala Road Bridge, Senior Engineer Hughes reviewed the proposed
Phases - first, to build the bridge and transfer traffic; second, to match in some of the
side streets; and then to demo the old bridge; timeframe would be to have traffic on
the new Pala Road Bridge by December 1999;
· Winchester Road off-ramp is in the process.
2
MID-TERM ISSUES
· Change Caltrans' designation of the freeway from rural to urban (should be
immediately completed);
Rural designation - interchanges are two miles apart at a minimum
Urban designation -interchanges may be as close as one mile apart
City Manager Bradley noted that such a change in designation will drop speed
limits and will require concurrence from the neighboring cities.
· Complete Project Study Report (PSR) for Santiago Road Overpass;
City Manager Bradley advised that staff has received input from neighbors in
opposition to the project; that the project is depicted in the Capital Improvement
Projects and that it has been funded;
It was requested by the City Council to proceed with the PSR in order to
determine feasibility of the project.
· Split diamond north of Winchester Road - City Council consensus to
complete the PSR.
· Date Street to be on- and off-ramp at Winchester Road;
· Realignment of Diaz Road at Rancho California Road - City Council
consensus to complete the realignment.
Public Works Director Kicak advised that this project has been scheduled for
Fiscal Year 2000-2001 but that its priority could be changed.
It was noted that extra highway patrol hours have been approved by the County -
Saturday coverage will be the County's responsibility and Sunday coverage will be
the City's responsibility;
· In light of Max Gillis' absence, there is a need for a strong advocate;
· Alternatives to Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue by way of Cherry or Date Streets
- bridge or dip crossing; it was City Council consensus to prioritize this item;
Mr. Kicak noted that permits will be necessary (Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Fish and Game, etc.). It was noted that Cherry Street is located in the Flood Control
Zone.
FOLLOWING PROJECTS SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY PROCEED
First Street Bridge - designed and ready
Highway 79 S extension and Western Bypass Corridor
Potential cut over at Cherry Street (north)
3
Via Montezuma ( short-term solution)
Avenida Alvaratio/Overland connection
Rancho Way
For Councilman Lindemans, it was noted, by City Manager Bradley, that the Finance
Department will be providing a detailed breakdown of RDA monies.
CIRCULATION MEETING
Community Development Director Thornhill noted that the consultant will be
providing a model of the proposed suggestions in order to assist in the prioritization
of these items.
Pala Road design south of Pala Bridge - City Council gave direction to work
on the design so that the project could immediately proceed once funding
is made available;
· Ynez Road from DePortola Road should be four lanes all the way through City
limits;
Councilman Stone noted that the Pechanga Entertainment Center should be held
financially responsible in sharing the cost of Pala Road improvements. It was noted that
the Subcommittee will be meeting with Pechanga to address that issue.
· West of Jefferson Avenue on Winchester Road need for an additional right-hand
turn lane;
Public Works Director Kicak advised that a study on this has been completed;
traffic engineer suggested to restripe Jefferson Avenue (southbound) to provide
for double left-hand turn onto Winchester Road (eastbound); block off eastern
portion of Enterprise Circle;
Councilman Comerchero suggested the use of two right-hand turn lanes at
Ynez/Winchester Roads to alleviate back-up on Jefferson Avenue. Mr. Kicak suggested
the addition of one lane across the bridge and to provide for two right-hand turn
movements to northbound I-15, noting that the second lane will provide the additional
straight-through lanes plus two right-hand turn lanes for 1-15. He advised that this
proposal has been presented to Caltrans.
It was the consensus of the City Council to install a double right-hand turn at
Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Bridge.
Councilman Comerchero suggested a City Council bus trip throughout the City to view
intersection functions, etc.
At 6:45 P.M., a short recess was called and at 7:00 P.M. Mayor Roberrs reconvened
the meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford requested that the City's sphere of influence be increased. It was
suggested that staff attend City of Murrieta and Riverside County City Council and
Commission meetings. City Manager Bradley noted that such attendance would require
additional staff time and, therefore, he suggested that this matter be continued for
additional discussion as an operating budget issue.
In response to Councilman Lindemans, Mayor Roberrs advised that efforts are
underway to obtain a lobbyist in Sacramento.
BOND ISSUE
City Manager Bradley advised that the financial consultant reviewed the current
commitments and values and that an analysis is being completed and will be provided to
the City Council at its November 17, 1998, Closed Session.
NICOLAS ROAD SIDEWALK TO RORIPAUGH
It was noted by Public Works Director Kicak that this sidewalk will be installed by the
City. Councilman Stone requested the issuance of a reimbursement agreement.
Y2K ISSUES
City Clerk Jones, in response to Mayor Pro Tem Ford, advised that a report has been
completed with regard to the potential impact on the software and that an on-going City-
wide analysis is being completed.
COMMISSIONS
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ford, Councilman Stone suggested that the Chairperson
of each Commission attend a monthly City Council meeting to provide a Commission
update to the Council. It was the consensus of the City Council to concur with
Councilman Stone's recommendation.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
To ensure that efficient and proper customer service is provided to major projects which
have newly relocated to the City, Councilman Stone suggested that a Councilmember
be assigned to such projects to assist and to ensure a proper and efficient planning
process.
In response to City Attorney Thorson, the following motion was offered:
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to declare that a subsequent need to discuss a
personnel issue which is the employment and appointment of a City Manager based on
the fact that the need for this particular discussion has arisen after the posting of the
agenda. The motion was seconded by Mayor Roberts and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
5
At 7:26 P.M., the Council convened into Closed Session. At 7:39 P.M. the City Council
reconvened in Open Session.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson noted that the City Council had met in Closed Session and that
there is nothing to report under the terms of the Brown Act for Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:40 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, November 10,
1998, at 7:00 P.M.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
6
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY
DIR.
CITY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
December 8, 1998
Lease One (1) Electric Vehicle
Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst..?...~_.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the 36 month lease for one (1) 1999 Ford Ranger electric
vehicle from Fritts Ford Fleet Center in the amount of $15,553.71.
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the 1998/99 annual Operating Budget approved the funding
for the purchase of two (2) mid size trucks for Building & Safety. At that time council directed staff
that one (1) of these trucks be an electric vehicle. The electric vehicle will replace a fully
depreciated truck and will be used by the Building & Safety inspection staff.
The City staff tested two Ford electric trucks with different battery arrangements. It was determined
the Ford EV Ranger with nickel metal hydride batteries is the preferred electric vehicle for its
intended use by the Building and Safety inspection staff. This vehicle is capable of a 100-mile
range and has a payload of 1250 Ibs. Ford Motor Company is also participating in the municipal
closed end lease program. Also, Ford Motor Company will install one (1)wall mounted conductive
charging station at no charge to the City. There are only two (2) companies, Ford and Chevrolet,
that are offering electric trucks through selected dealerships. The lowest quote is from Fritts Ford
in Riverside. Because of the specialized maintenance training requirement, the electric vehicles
can only be purchased and serviced at these dealerships. The purchase of this truck from Fritts
Ford will satisfy one (1) of the two (2) vehicular requirements for Building & Safety.
Dealer Vehicle/model # Price
Fritts Ford (1) Mid size, pick-up $15,553.71
(Riverside) Range EV
City Chevrolet
(San Diego)
(1) Mid size, pick-up
S-10 EV
$18,017.10
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for vehicle
depreciation expense for this fiscal year.
ITEM 6
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY Of TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
Consent to Record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant Easement
for Portion of Lot 539 of Tract No. 3883
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION OF AN
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A GRANT OF
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES FOR LOT 539 OF
TRACT 3883 FOR PURPOSES OF RECORDATION BUT NOT
ACCEPTING THIS DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
BACKGROUND: Public Improvement requirements for the development of Tract
23583 necessitate the dedication of an easement for the purposes of storm drain construction.
The storm drain alignment and outlet configuration of Tract 23583 require a drainage easement
on the off-site property; Lot 539 of Tract 3883. Lot 539 will accept flow from Tract 23583.
The Owner of Lot 539 of Tract 3883 has submitted an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant
of Easement to facilitate the installation of the proposed storm drain outlet.
Staff recommends that the City Council consent to the recordation of the irrevocable offer of
grant of easement, but not accept the dedication until a later date partly contingent on the work
being completed satisfactorily.
FISCALIMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 98- , with Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B"
R:\agdrpt98\1208\TR23583 drainage easementJsmc
1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION OF AN
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A GRANT OF
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES FOR LOT 539 OF
TRACT 3883 FOR PURPOSES OF RECORDATION BUT NOT
ACCEPTING THIS DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. City Staff has established the requirement for certain improvements as conditions
of approval for the development of Tract 23583.
B. As part of the construction of the required drainage improvements it is necessary
for the owner, Meadowview Community Association, of Lot 539 of Tract 3883 to provide an
easement for drainage purposes;
C. The owner, Meadowview Community Association, of Lot 539 of Tract 3883, has
submitted an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement for drainage purposes;
D. Recordation of this irrevocable offer of dedication grant of easement serves both
the public and private interests of the community.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to consent to the
recordation of the irrevocable offer of dedication the Grant of Easement by the owner,
Meadowview Community Association, of Lot 539 of Tract 3883 for drainage purposes as
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby consents to the recordation of the irrevocable offer of dedication the grant of easement
by the owner, Meadowview Community Association, of Lot 539 of Tract 3883, for drainage
purposes, for recordation only but does not accept the dedication at this time.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 8th day of December, 1998.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt98\1208\TR23583 drainage easementJsmc
2
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of December, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\agdrpt98\1208\TR23583 drainage easementJsmc
3
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula - City Clerk
P O Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Temecula
P O Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF GRANT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT
The undersigned, being an authorized representative of the present title owner of record of the herein described parcel
of land, do hereby make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State
of California, and its successors or assigns, for drainage purposes together with the rights of ingress and egress for
maintenance and emergency vehicles, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect
to such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements
thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local
governing bodies or its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument
this ~-th day of tg.{Z4~P~/" , 19 qf
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my h~,ACand official s al.
Signature
JL
COMM. it 1167974
NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA~
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
Presfil~nt.
Print Name and Title
/v~&,'j,o~/vi ex 7 Cor~n'ttltl ': :'/ , ':':" :,
This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
municipal corporation, is hereby accepted for purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept
the offer of dedication.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Ron Robe. rts, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R:\MAXWELW\98\FORMS\TRACT 23583. EASTM ENT. DOC
EXHIBIT "A" OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Being a portion of Lot 539 of Tract No. 3883 in the city of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California as filed in book 63, pages 1 through 35 inclusive, of maps,
in the recorders office of said county, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the centerline of Calle Madero and North General Keamy Road North
74°11 '38" West a distance of 97.87 feet;
Thence southwesterly, leaving said Calle Madero centerline, South 15048'22'' West a
distance of 30.00 feet to a point, said point being on the southerly right of way line of
Calle Madero, said point also being the beginning of a 35.00 foot radius, on a curve
concave to the southwesterly, a radial line to said point bears South 15048'22'' West,
said point also being the True Point Of Beginning;
Thence South 74°11 '38" East along said dght of way line of Calle Madero a distance of
180.45 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 35.00 feet, concave to the north and
northwesterly;
Thence along said curve through a central angle of 94003'35'', a distance of 57.46 feet;
Thence South 11 °44'47" West a distance of 95.11 feet;
Thence North 78°15'13'' West a distance of 110.00 feet;
Thence North 11 °44'47" East a distance of 107.88 feet to a point on a curve concave to
the north and west having a radius of 35.00 feet;
Thence along said curve to a point on the southerly dght of way line of Calle Madero
through a central angle of 85°56'25'' distance of 52.50 feet, said point also being the
True Point Of Beginning.
Containing 15,557 square feet or 0.357 acres.
L R. Mark:ham
.C.E. 30657
-31-00
No. 30657 ~' .~'
,~Exp. 3/31/00 ·
F L ~
R= 55.00' i ~
L= 52.50' """
T= 52.60' / D=/gR4d03 '35"
"V"= "A"
bo ~ L= 57.46'
r,,. ~,G(C, / T= 57.57'
~.: I
' / "
LOT 54,
I '
iRACT
NO. 388.3 , E 10.00,
1
"t~L~4 /1
SCALE: ~ DRAWN BY: ~ DATE: ~ PROJECT; 1"= 30' ACAD SEP. 28,1998
, EXHIBIT "B"
I JOB NO:
I s.~rr ~ oF 7 835
DICK-CON
ITEM 7
CITY MANAGER ~--~'/
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-1 (Southeasterly corner of
Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT the public streets, and sewer and water system improvements in Tract No. 22915-1
2. AUTHORIZE reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities to the ten-percent warranty
amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-1 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision Agreements
and Surety Bonds were submitted by:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
24461 Ridge Route Drive, Suite #100
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American
Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 11 961 in the amount of $2,589,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 300 11 961 in the amount of $128,000 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 11 961 in the amount of $191,000 to cover sewer improvements.
4. Bond No. PB 300 11 961 in the amount of $1,454,000 to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
5. Bond No. PB 300 11 962 in the amount of $29,000 to cover subdivision monumentation.
1
R:~,GDRP'F98\1208\TR227162. FIN
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The
name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor
Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a
California Corporation). The new partnership has executed a new agreement and submitted riders
to the surety bonds for in the appropriate amounts for City Council acceptance and approval.
On June 28, 1994, the City Council accepted a substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
authorized the reduction of the Faithful Performance securities based on Public Works Staff
recommendations to the following amounts for which riders to the sureties were posted:
Streets, Water, and Sewer Improvements Bond No. PB 300 11 961 $1,017,800
The subdivider also posted replacement bonds in the full amount for the following items:
Labor and Materials
Bond No. PB300 11 961 $1,454,000
Subdivision Monumentation
Bond No. PB300 11 962
$29,000
Public Works Staff has reviewed and approved the public Improvements. The Eastern Municipal and
Rancho California Water Districts have approved and accepted their facilities. Therefore Staff
recommends acceptance of the public improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty pedod, and
reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amount, as follows:
Streets, Water, and Sewer Improvements PB300 11 921
$290,800
The subdivision monumentation will be reviewed in the office and in the field, and when satisfactory,
will be recommended for City Council release of this security.
The developer was also required to post security for labor and materials to assure payment to
suppliers of such goods and services. This security is held for the contractual six-month lien period
following City Council acceptance of the public improvements
The public streets within this tract will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City
Council Resolution at a later date. The streets to be accepted are Corte Valentine, Corte Canel,
Code Del Cerro, Code Camara, and Code Montia, and a podion of Rancho Vista Road, Via Vistana,
Via Vasquez, and Camino De La Torre. The podion of Meadows Parkway within the tract boundary
will be accepted at such time that the work performed under Assessment District No. 159 and
Communities Facilities District No. 88-3 is completed and accepted by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Location Map
2
R:~,GDRPT~98\1208\TR227151 .FIN
i~OAD
TRACT NO. 22915-1
Location
Map
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
-Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-2. (Nodheasterly of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
PREPARED BY~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT the Public Improvements Faithful Performance in Tract No. 22916-2.
2. AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten-percent (10%)
warranty amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22916-2, and entered into
subdivision agreements with
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
24461 Ridge Route Drive, Suite #100
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American
Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $372,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $50,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $56,000 to cover sewer improvements.
4. Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $239,250 to cover material and labor
for street, water, and sewer improvements.
5. Bond No. PB 300 13 183 in the amount of $10,944 to cover subdivision monumentation.
1
R :'~AGDRP'T~98\1117~TR227162 .FIN
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The
name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor
Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a
Califomia Corporation). On June 14, 1984, the new partnership executed a subdivision improvement
agreement and submitted riders to the bonds reflecting the change in ownership, for City Council
acceptance and approval. The surety and bond amounts remained the same
Public Works Staff has reviewed and approved the public improvements. Eastern Municipal and
Rancho Califomia Water Districts have approved and accepted their improvements. Therefore Staff
recommends acceptance of the public improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty pedod, and
reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amount as follows:
Bond No. PB300 12 676 in the amount of $47,850 for Faithful Performance warranty.
The developer was also required to provide secudty for the payment for Labor and Materials relating
to the public improvements. This security will be held for the contractual six-month period following
City Council acceptance of the public improvements
The Subdivision Monumentation will be reviewed and approved, and then recommended to City
Council for release of the Subdivision Monumentation security.
The public streets within this subdivision will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by City Council Resolution at a later date. The streets to be accepted are Corte Carmela and Via
Reina. That portion of meadows Parkway within the tract boundary will be accepted into the City
Maintained-Street System at such time that the work performed under Assessment Distdct No. 159
and Community Facilities District No. 88-3 is completed and accepted by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Location Map
2
R:~AGDRP'T'~98\1117~TR227162 .FIN
_./
,-®
p~o~.ect
TRACT NO.
22916 - 2
Location Map
ITEM 9
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
(~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-F. (Northeasterly comer
of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
PREPARED BY:/~f~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
/~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-F.
2. AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the ten-percent (10%) warranty
amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22916-F, and entered into
subdivision agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
24461 Ridge Route Drive, Suite #100
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American
Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $1,095,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $86,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $115,500 to cover sewer improvements.
4. Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $648,000 to cover material and labor for
for street, water, and sewer improvements.
5. Bond No. PB 300 13 185 in the amount of $22,686 to cover subdivision monumentation.
1
R:~,GDRPT~8\I 117~TR227162 .FIN
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The
name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor
Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a
California Corporation). A new agreement was executed by the partnership and riders in the full
amount was submitted for City Council acceptance and approval on June 14, 1994. The Surety
remains the same. The riders reflect the change in principal.
Public Works Staff has reviewed and approved the public improvements, the Eastern Municipal and
Rancho California Water Districts have previously approved their facilities. Therefore Staff
recommends the acceptance of the public improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty period,
and reduction in the Faithful Performance security to the following ten-percent (10%) warrant
amount:
Bond No. PB300 12 678 in the amount of $129,750 for Faithful Performance Warranty.
The developer is also required to provide security for the payment for Labor and Materials to
suppliers of such materials and services relating to the public improvements. This security is
maintained for the contractual six-month lien period following City Council acceptance of the public
improvements.
The Subdivision Monumentation will be reviewed and approved, and then recommended to the City
Council for release of the Subdivision Monumentation security.
The public streets within this tract will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City
Council Resolution at a later date. The streets to be accepted are Corte Bacarro , Camino
Seneco, and Via Torres, and a portion of Pauba Road and Corte Parado. That portion of Meadows
Parkway within the tract boundary will be accepted at such time that the work performed under
Assessment District No. 159 and Community Facilities District No. 88-3 is completed and accepted
by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Location Map
2
R:~GDRP'r~98\1117~TR22716F.FIN
pAue,~, izo
I(~) c~
oo
~J
ti t
/YOT i,.~
t RACT NO. 22916 - F
Location Map
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
(~"'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Passenger Loading Zone - East Side of Margarita Road between Pauba
Road and Rancho Vista Road
PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer, Traffic
RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that
the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING PASSENGER LOADING ZONE ON THE
EAST SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN PAUBA ROAD AND
RANCHO VISTA ROAD
BACKGROUND: The City received a request to consider establishing a passenger
loading zone on the east side of Margarita Road between Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road.
The passenger-loading zone was requested to allow parents to drop-off and pick-up the
students on Margarita Road in front of the Temecula Valley High School.
Currently, parking and stopping is restricted on the west side of Margarita Road between
Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road, in front of the Sports Park, between the hours of 6:00
a.m. and 3:00 p.m. This restriction was established to discourage the parents from dropping off
the students on the west side of Margarita Road which could result in jay walking. Parking is
currently allowed on Margarita Road in front of the high school, except in front of the existing
gate, fire hydrant and at intersections (Exhibit "A"). Due to students parking on Margarita Road
in front of the high school, some parents double park to drop-off or pick-up the students which
impedes the flow of traffic on Margarita Road. The proposed passenger-loading zone will
provide a covenient location for the parents to drop-off and pick-up the students.
At the November 12, 1998 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission
reviewed this request and after a lengthy discussion unanimously recommended that the City
Council adopt a resolution to extend the red curb on the east side of Margarita Road south of
Rancho Vista Road and establish a passenger loading zone on the remaining portion between
Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road as shown on Exhibit "A".
- 1 - RAAGDRPt~98\1208Lschpedloadzone
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department
Maintenance Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 98-
2. Exhibit "A" Proposed Passenger Loading Zone
- 2 - R:~,GDRPt~98\1208~schpedloadzone
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A PASSENGER LOADING ZONE
ON THE EAST SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN
PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.16.280, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following
"Passenger Loading" Zone location is hereby established in the City of Temecula.
East side of Margarita Road between Pauba Road
and Margarita Road as shown on Exhibit "A".
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 8th day of December, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98- __ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of December, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
- 3 - R:~AGDRPfi98\1208~schpedloadzone
EXHIBIT "A'
Proposed "No Parking" and
"Passenger Loading" zone
PROPOSED
RED CURB
EXISTING
GATE
TEMECULA
VALLEY
HIGH
SCHOOL
NO SCALE
PROPOSED
PASSENGER
LOADING ZONE
EXISTING RED CURB
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Program Supplement No. M002 to Administering Local Agency/State
Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 (009)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08°5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. STPLG-
5459(009) FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ON VIA LAS
COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
BACKGROUND: The City received STP funding in the amount of
$142,170.00. These funds have been programmed for the cost of installation of two (2) traffic
signals, one at Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle West in the amount of $71,585.00 and
the second at Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas. The Winchester Road/Enterprise
Circle signal has been approved by the City Council on November 10, 1998. The attached
agreement is for Rancho California Road/Via Las Colinas signal.
FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated cost of this signal is $117,300.00. The project is
included in the approved Fiscal Year 1998-1999 Capital Improvement Budget with STP and
DIF-Traffic funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 98-
2. Program Supplemental Agreement No. M002
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt002-M\me
1
rESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT NO. M002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. STPLG-
5459(009) FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ON VIA LAS
COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA rOAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, before Federal Aid will be made available for Project No. STPLG-
5459(009), for installation of a traffic signal on Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Road, the
LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Program Supplemental No. M002 to Administering Agency-State
Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 allocates funding in the amount of $71,585.00
for traffic signal installation on Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program
Supplemental Agreement No. M002 between State Department of Transportation and the City of
Temecula.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 8th day of December 1998.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt002-M\me
2
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of December, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt002-M\me
3
PROGRAM SUPPT~MENT NO. M002
to
ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
Date: November 10, 1998
Location: 08-RIV-0-TMCA
Project Number: STPLG-5459(009)
E.A. N-tuber: 08-924328
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into
between the Agency and the State on 03/07/97 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement
is adopted in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. ,
approved by the Agency on (See copy attached).
The Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with
the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TEEMINI:
In the City of Temecula at the intersection of Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Rd.
TYPE OF WORK: Install Traffic Signal
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PMASE (S) OF WORK
[ ] Preliminary Engineering
IX] Construction Engineering
Estimated Cost
33T
$71,584.00
[ ] Right-Of-Way
Federal Funds
$71,584.00
LOCAL
LENGTH:
[X]Construction
Matching Funds
$0.00
0.1 (MILES)
OTHER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By By
Chief, Office of Local Programs
Date Project Implementation
Attest
Date
Title
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
162 1996 2660-101-890 (v,,9~-97 ~~.f0.010.810 C 262040 892-F
$71,584.00
JUlOUNT
71,584.00
Program Supplement 08-5459-M002- ISTEA Page I of 2
08-RIV-0-TMCA
STPLG-5459(009)
11/10/1998
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the ~mprovements, referred to in Article III
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the
responsibility of the Local Agency and shall be performed at
regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the
completed improvements.
The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local
Programs Project Implementation.
The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this
project in accordance with the current Local Program Procedures
or the new Local Progr~s Manual, when issued.
Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report
covering-the allowability of cost payments for each individual
consultant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the
project. The audit report must state the applicable cost
principles utilized by the auditor in determining allowable costs
as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable
Costs.
Program Supplement08-5459-M002-ISTEA Page 2 of 2
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
'~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 8, 1998
Program Supplement Agreement No. M003 to Administering Local
Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 (009)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M003, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. HP 21L-
1188{001) OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING FROM YNEZ
ROAD TO JEFFERSON AVENUE
BACKGROUND: City of Temecula was one of the few cities that was
successful in obtaining federal funds from TEA 21 Demonstration Project Funding. The amount
of the total grant is approximately $3.75 million. These grant funds are allocated to agencies
over a six (6) year period at percentages as indicated in the special conditions of the Program
Supplement No. M003. The first year, FY 1998, allocation is 11%, 1999, 15%, 2000 and 2001 -
18% and 2002 and 2003 - 19%.
Attached Program Supplement No. M003 is an allocation of $411,331 or the 11% of the total
project funding for FY 1998.
The agreements in future years will provide for the remaining funding over the five (5) year
period. The funding as may be required over and above the allocated funds must be from local
source and any funding required to complete the construction must be advanced by the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that approximately $1.5 million will be
available from TEA 21 during construction period. Balance of the funding or $2.25 million will
have to be advanced by the City from Capital Project Reserves.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 98-
2. Program Supplemental Agreement No. M002
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt003-M\me
1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT NO. M003, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PROJECT NO. HP 21L-
1188(001) OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING FROM YNEZ
ROAD TO JEFFERSON AVENUE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, before Federal Aid will be made available for Project No. HP 21L-
1188(001), Overland Drive Overcrossing from Ynez Road to Jefferson Avenue, the LOCAL
AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Program Supplemental No. 003-M to Administering Agency-State
Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5459 allocates funding in the amount of $411,331.00
for Overland Drive Overcrossing from Ynez Road to Jefferson Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program
Supplemental Agreement No. M003 between State Department of Transportation and the City
of Temecula.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 8th day of December 1998.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt003-M\me
2
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of December, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\98\1208~supplementalagrmt003-M\me
3
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. M003
to
ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
Date: November 13, 1998
Location: 08-RIV-0-TMCA
Project N-tuber: HP21L- 1188(001)
E.A. N-,~her: 08-924316
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into
between the Agency and the State on 03/07/97 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement
is adopted in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. ,
approved by the Agency on (See copy attached).
The Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with
the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON OVERLAND DR OVERCROSSING FROM YNEZ RD TO JEFFERSON AVE.
TYPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCT ROADWAY & OVERCROSSING BRIDGE
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE (S) OF WORK
[ ] Preliminary Engineering
[ ] Construction Engineering
Estimated Cost Federal Funds
Q92
$5 14, ] 63.00
[ ] Right-Of-Way
$411,331.00
LENGTH:
~ Construction
Matching Funds
LOCAL
$102,832.00 $0.00
0.3 (MXLES)
OTHER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
Chief, Office of Local Programs
Date Project Implementation
Attest Date
Title
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
282 1997 2660-101-890 ~-9~.30.010.680 C 262042 892-F 411,331.00
Program Supplement 08-5459-M003- ISTEA Page I of 2
08-RIV-0-TMCA
HP21L-1188(001)
11/13/1998
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the improvements, referred to in Article III
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the
responsibility of the Local Agency and shall be performed at
regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the
completed improvements.
2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
l{m~ted to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local
Programs Project Implementation.
3. This agreement supplements the Local Agency-State Master
Agreement for Federal-Aid projects, with the understanding that
all provisions of the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act (ISTEA) apply.
4. The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this
projectin accordance with the current Local Program Procedures
or the new Local Programs Manual, when issued.
5. This project is funded in whole or in part with Demonstration
Funds from TEA-21 (P.L.105-178) Section 110 (a)(13). Under 23
U.S.C. 117(b), these funds are to allocated as follows: 11
percent in FY 1998, 15 percent in FY 1999, 18 percent in each of
FY 2000 and FY 2001, and 19 percent in each of FY 2002 and FY
2003. Future funding is subject to budget allocations and other
actions of the U.S. government.
6. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report
covering the allowability of cost payments for each individual
consultant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the
project. The audit report must state the applicable cost
principles utilized by the auditor in determining allowable costs
as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable
Costs.
Program Supplement08-5459-M003-ISTEA Page 2 of 2
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
NOVEMBER 17, 1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called
to order at 7:37 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Chairman Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans,
Roberrs, and Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 10, 1998.
2 Award of Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Sidewalk Project - Project
No. PW97-16
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Award a construction contract to E.A. Mendoza, Inc. for the base bid in the
amount of $325,100.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract;
2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $32,510.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2.
The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Recommendation for Operations of the Temecula Museum
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Award a professional services agreement of $285,860 to Think Jacobson and
Roth for the preparation of the design, fabrication, and installation of exhibits,
signage, and other appurtenances for the Museum Project;
3.2
Authorize General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $28,586 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
3.3
Appropriate $335,946 from TCSD unreserved Fund Balance to the Museum
Capital Budget to cover the cost of the contract, contingency, and project
administration;
3.4
Appropriate $92,790 from TCSD unreserved Fund Balance for the Museum
Operating Budget;
3.5
Appropriate $15,900 to Information Systems Internal Service Fund for
computer and phone equipment;
3.6
Authorize an amendment to the current Schedule of Authorized Positions to
include a Museum Services Manager.
Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (of record), advising that
funding for the position of Museum Services Manager has been included in the proposed
figures and that the construction of the museum has been funded through Development
Impact Fees.
In response to Director Comerchero, Mr. Parker noted that it has been estimated that the gift
shop and the use of the Chapel and its associated costs will generate approximately
$35,000 for the first year. Mr. Parker advised that this estimated revenue has not been
factored into any of the proposed figures.
For Director Lindemans, Finance Director Roberts advised that the Redevelopment Agency
bond issue was allocated to various projects but that the museum was not one of those
projects and that the museum was initially funded through Development Impact Fees and
Capital Reserves.
In response to Director Lindemans, Finance Director Roberts noted that staff would explore
the possibility of funding the museum through Redevelopment funds.
Community Services Director Parker, in response to President Stone, stated that staff would
pursue a possible donation of an elevator for this facility.
Although he does own property in Old Town, President Stone advised that, as per the City
Attorney, he may participate in this vote.
2
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to concur with the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
4 Cox PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ground Lease A.qreement at Paloma del Sol Park
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve in substantial form, final form to be approved by City Manager and
the City Attorney, the lease agreement between the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) and Cox PCS Assets, L.L.C. for the installation,
operation, and maintenance of a wireless Personal Communications Services
(PCS) facility at Paloma del Sol Park.
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse reviewed the staff report (as per agenda
material), noting that the proposed pole will not exceed the height of the existing light
standard poles.
MOTION: Director Roberts moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Director Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker invited the community to attend the upcoming Holiday
Festivities: Winter Wonderland Program on Saturday, December 12, 1998 which will include
a Holiday Craft Fair and Breakfast with Santa; and the Sixth Annual Santa's Electric Light
Parade on Thursday, December 3, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Bradley as well encouraged everyone to attend the upcoming Holiday
Festivities.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:53 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
ITEM 2
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
December 8, 1998
Proposed Residential Street Lighting Fee - Parcel Map No. 26488
PREPARED BY:
Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HEI.D ON
DECEMBER 8, 1998 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 1-4 WITHIN
PARCEL MAP NO. 26488 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVF. I. B RATES
AND CHARGES BEGINNING HSCAL YEAR 1999-00 PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE XHID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION.
Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and
Tabulation of the Ballots.
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting services
to numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through "Service Level B".
Pursuant to the request of the property owner, staff has initiated proceedings to assume the
responsibility for long-term residential street lighting services within Parcel Map No. 26488
beginning Fiscal Year 1999-00. On October 13, 1998, and in accordance with Proposition 218,
the Board of Directors adopted the resolution of intention to file the levy report on lots 1-4
within Parcel Map No. 26488. The Notice of Public Hearing was subsequently mailed to the
property owner identifying the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as
follows:
R:\yasinobk\election\26488.eletionslb 12/8/98
Service Level B 925.68 per parcel
At tonight's Public Hearing, the Board of Directors must hear and consider all objections or
protests to the levy report for Parcel Map No. 26488 and the proposed rates and charges. If a
written protest is presented by the property owner, the Board must reject the proposed fee and
abandon any further proceedings. In this instance, a homeowner's association would be required
to assume the street lighting responsibilities.
However, if the property owner does not submit a written protest against the proposed rates and
charges, the Board of Directors may then adopt the proposed fee subject to an election requiring
a majority approval of the affected property owners. In this instance, the Board of Directors can
order and call an election for January 22, 1999, and authorize staff to proceed with mailing a
notice and ballot to the property owner of Parcel Map No. 26488, a copy of which is attached for
your review.
Pursuant to the ballot process, staff is also recommending the approval of the attached Procedures
for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. The ballot procedure explains the process
for completion, return and tabulation of the ballot and will be included as part of the mailed ballot
documents. The ballot can only be completed by the property owner of each parcel. In order to
be counted, the ballot must be completed in compliance with these procedures and returned to
the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to 3:30 p.m. on January 22, 1999. The ballot will be
opened by the City Clerk/District Secretary on January 22, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. in the Main
Conference Room in City Hall. The results of the election shall be announced by the City
Clerk/District Secretary at the Community Services District meeting on February 9, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT: In the event that the Board of Directors calls for an election, staff will prepare
the notices, ballot and election procedures in-house·
If approved by the property owners, beginning Fiscal Year 1999-00, the proposed levy of 925.68
per parcel for Service Level B will generate 9102.72 annually for residential street lighting services
within the subdivision. Sufficient funds will be generated to cover the costs of providing
residential street lighting services.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution Calling and Noticing the Election.
Notice and Ballot Form.
Procedures for Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots.
R:\yasinobk\election\26488.eletionslb 12/8/98
PARCELMAP NO. 26488
VICINITYMAP
Not to Scale
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CAIJ,ING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 22, 1999 FOR
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 26488 TO ESTABLISH
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
1999-00 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIID, Section 6 of the
California Constitution, there is hereby called and ordered to be held on January 22, 1999 an
election for the purpose of obtaining approval by property owners of Parcel Map No. 26488 in
the City of Temecula to establish Service Level B Rates and Charges beginning Fiscal Year 1999-
00.
Section 2. The notice and ballot to be submitted to the property owners shall be
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Procedures for the
Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots ("Ballot Procedures") presented to the Board at
this meeting and directs such procedures be placed on file in the office of the Secretary of the
Temecula Community Services District and open to public inspection.
Section 3. All ballots must be received by the Secretary of the Temecula
Community Services District no later than 3:30 p.m. on January 22, 1999. In all particulars not
recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided in the Ballot
Procedures.
Section 4. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is hereby
authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The officers and staff of the Temecula
Community Services District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as
may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election.
Yasinobk\26488 .electionreso 12/08/99
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 8th day of December 8, 1998.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 98- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of December, 1998, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
AB SENT: DIRECTORS:
r:\yasinobk\electionx,23583ele.res 071498
Yasinobk\26488.electionreso 1 2108199
NOTICE OF ELECTION
PROPOSED SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR
PARCEL MAP NO. 26488 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-00
Pursuant to the request of the property owner of Lots 1-4 within Parcel Map No. 26488,
the Temecula Community Services District has initiated proceedings to assume maintenance of residential
street lighting within Parcel Map No. 26488, beginning with the Fiscal Year 1999/00. Pursuant to this
request, and pursuant to Government Code Section 6162 1.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report")
to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description of each parcel of
property to be charged for this maintenance and the proposed amount of the maintenance charge for each
parcel for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
The proposed SenAce Level B rate and charge against each of the four (4) above mentioned
parcels within Parcel Map No. 26488 beginning Fiscal Year 1999-00 is $25.68. The proposed levy rate of
$25.68 per parcel provides revenue for residential street lighting services within this subdivision. This
amount was calculated by dMding the total estimated maintenance cost for Fiscal year 1999-00 ($102.72)
by the total number of parcels in this subdivision.
On December 8, 1998, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and
the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and
considered all objections or protests to the Report and to the proposed rates and charges. At the conclusion
of the public hearing, the Board determined that written protests against the proposed fee were presented
by less than a majority of owners of the parcels on which the proposed fee is to be imposed, and levied the
rates and charges subject to approval by the property owner subject to the proposed rates and charges.
The Board of Directors encourages you to retum the enclosed ballot indicating whether you
support or oppose the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. Ballots may be mailed to the City
Clerk/District Secretary at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to
the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 no later than
3:30 p.m. on January 22, 1999.
The proposed Service Level B rates and charges will be abandoned if the ballot is not
retumed in favor of the proposed rates and charges. In the event the proposed charges are abandoned, the
homeowners association will assume responsibility for residential street lighting services within the
subdivision.
Enclosed is your ballot and the District's Procedures for the completion, return and
tabulation of Ballots. Please consult these Procedures for details regarding the ballot process. You may
also contact the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033,
Temecula, Califomia, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Califomia
92590, for further information regarding this matter.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPLETION, RETURN, AND TABULATION OF BALLOTS
PARCEL MAP NO. 26488
I. Completion of Ballots
· Who may complete a ballot
A ballot may be completed by the owner of the parcel to be charged. As used in these Procedures, the term
"owner" includes the owner's authorized representative. If the owner of the parcel is a partnership, joint
tenancy, or tenancy in common, a ballot may be completed by any of the general partners, joint tenants, or
tenants in common. Only one ballot may be completed for each parcel.
Duplicate ballots
If a ballot is lost, destroyed or never received, the City Clerk/District Secretary will provide a duplicate
ballot to the owner upon receipt of a request in writing to the City Clerk, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula,
Califomia, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92590. The duplicate ballot will be marked to show the date on which the
ballot was provided and to identi~J it as a duplicate ballot.
Marking and signing the ballot
To complete a ballot, the owner of the parcel must (1) mark the appropriate box supporting or opposing
the proposed rate and charge, and (2) sign, under penalty of perjury, the statement on the ballot that the
person completing the ballot is the owner of the parcel or the owner's authorized representative. Only one
box may be marked on each ballot. Ballots must be completed in ink.
· Only ballots provided by the District will be accepted
The District will only accept ballots mailed or otherwise provided to owners by the District. Photocopies,
faxes, and other forms of the ballot will not be accepted.
II. Return of Ballots
· Who may return ballots
A ballot may be returned by the owner of the parcel or by anyone authorized by the owner to return the
ballot.
· Where to return ballots
Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California,
92589-9033, (the District has provided a retum postage-paid envelope). Ballots may also be delivered in
person to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590. Ballots may not be retumed by fax.
· When to return ballots
All returned ballots must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office prior to 3:30 p.m. on
January 22, 1999. The City Clerk/District Secretary will stamp on the ballot the date of its receipt.
· Withdrawal of ballots
After returning a ballot to the District, the person who signed the ballot may withdraw the ballot by
submitting a written request in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590. Such request must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to
3:30 p.m. on January 22, 1999. If any ballot has been withdrawn, the person withdrawing the ballot may
request a duplicate ballot. The City Clerk/District Secretary will retain all withdrawn ballots and will
indicate on the face of such ballots that they have been withdrawn.
llI. Tabulation of Ballots
· Which ballots will be counted
Only ballots which are completed and returned in compliance with these procedures will be counted.
Ballots received by the City Clerk/District Secretary after 3:30 p.m. on January 22, 1999 will not be
counted. Ballots which are not signed by the owner will not be counted. Ballots with no boxes marked,
or with more than one box marked, will not be counted. Ballots withdrawn in accordance with these
procedures will not be counted.
The City Clerk/District Secretary will keep a record of each duplicate ballot provided to an owner and will
verify, prior to counting any duplicate ballot, that only one ballot has been retumed for the parcel. If a non-
duplicate ballot has been returned, the District will count the non-duplicate ballot and disregard all duplicate
ballots. If only duplicate ballots have been returned, the District will count the earliest provided duplicate
ballot and disregard the later provided duplicate ballots.
How ballots will be tabulated
Ballots may be counted by hand, by computer or by any other tabulating device.
Who will tabulate ballots
Ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary.
· When and where will the ballots be tabulated
Ballots will be opened and tabulated on Friday, January 22, 1999, at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference
Room at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590. This process is open to the
general public.
· Results of tabulation
The results of the tabulation will be announced following the completion of the tabulation and entered in
the minutes of the next Board of Directors meeting on FebmaW 9, 1999.
1V. Resolution of Disputes
In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is the owner of the parcel to which the
ballot applies, the District will make such determination from the last equalized assessment roll and any
evidence of ownership submitted to the City ClerlUDistrict Secretary. The District will be under no duty
to obtain or consider any other evidence as to ownership of property and the District's determination of
ownership will be final and conclusive.
In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is an authorized representative of the
owner of the parcel, the District may rely on the statement on the ballot, signed under penalty of perjury,
that the person completing the ballot is the owner's authorized representative and any evidence submitted
to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other
evidence as to whether the signer of the ballot is an authorized representative of the owner and the District's
determination will be final and conclusive.
V. General Information
For further information, contact the City ClerkdDistrict Secretary at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box
9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
OFFICIAL BALLOT
PARCEL MAP NO. 26488
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING SERVICES
PROPERTY:
Lots 1-4 of Parcel Map No. 26488,
as filed in Book 91 of Parcel Maps,
Page 95, in the Office of
the County Recorder of Riverside
Cotmty, California.
OWNER:
Mr. Jay Vanderwal
325 Holmwood Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92663
YES, I approve of the proposed
annual levy of $25.68 for Service
Level B on the parcels identified on
this ballot.
NO, I do not approve of the
proposed annual levy of $25.68 for
Service Level B on the parcels
identified on this ballot. I
understand that a "NO" vote may
require me to pay street lighting
fees to my Homeowners'
Association.
I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury that I am the record owner, or the authorized
representative of the record owner, of the parcels identified above.
Signature Date
Print Name
CHECK ONLY ONE BOX. BALLOTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK AND
RETURNED TO THE CITY CLERK/DISTRICT SECRETARY AT THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, P.O. BOX 9033/43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, 92589-9033 PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 22, 1999.
ITEM 3
CITY ATTORNAEPYPR-C~'~
DIRECTOR OF FINI~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
/~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
December 8, 1998
Naming of City Park
PREPARED BY:
Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve a recommendation from the
Community Services Commission to name the 4.5 acre park site located on Margadta Road,
Winchester Creek Park.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City policy, it is the responsibility of the Community Services
Commission to forward recommendations concerning the naming of City park and recreation facilities
to the Board of Directors for a final decision. On November 23, 1998, the Community Services
Commission recommended the name listed above be considered by the Board of Directors for a 4.5
acre park located on Margarita Road north of Winchester Road and adjacent to the Winchester
Creek housing development.
The park construction has been completed and the park is currently in its maintenance pedod. It is
recommended that the Board of Directors approve a name for the park so that the contractor may
order and install the park monument sign pdor to the dedication of the park to the community. At its
November 23, 1998 meeting, the Community Services Commission recommended that the park be
named Winchester Creek Park.
According to the existing naming policy, the Board of Directors may approve the park name ,as
recommended by the Community Services Commission, or may consider any other names desired.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
R:%,RUSEP~AGENDAS~naming winchester creek park,csd.doc
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on April 23, 1991, the Board of Directors (the "Board") adopted a policy
for naming parks and recreation facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Community Services District and the Parks and Recreation Commission
requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as set forth on
Exhibit "A" is adopted establishing a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for
the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
Ronald J. Parks, President
ATFEST:
Reaos CSD 92-08
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-rF:~REBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. CSD 92-08 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of September 1992 by the following roll call vote.
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mufioz
Parks,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Resos CSD 92-08
Exhibit "A"
TE1VLECUh CONLIVIUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
PURPOSE
To establish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies
criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
POLICY
The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the
selection of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a
name is selected, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors
for ratification. Staff will be responsible for encouraging
citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that
will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration.
At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated
a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming
pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a
minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall.be given a name which
might be perceived as controversial by the community. All names
selected shall be acceptable and meaningful to a majority of the
neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is
located.
Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical locations,
historic significance or geologic features. No park shall.'be named
for a person, except where an individual has made a significant
financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of
the park or facility, or has been an outstanding long-time
community leader who has supported open space and recreational
activities.
All park and recreation facilities will be designated a formal name
within six months of acquisition or construction. All parks shall
have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a
plaque inside the facility for name identification.
The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after
a hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and
direction. No name shall be changed unless there is significant
justification and support by the community.
RESPONSIBILITY ACTION
Department
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
Department
Acquires a new park or recreation
facility.
Solicits possible names from community.
Forwards suggested names to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for consideration.
Receives any additional community input.
Selects a name for the new park or
recreation facility.
ForWards name
ratification.
to City Council for
Installs the appropriate naming sign or
plaque.
RESPONSIBILITY
Department
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
Department
ACTION
Acquires a new park or recreation
facility·
Solicits possible names from community.
Forwards suggested names to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for consideration.
Receives any additional community input.
Selects a name for the new park or
recreation facility·
ForWards name
ratification·
to City Council for
Installs the appropriate naming sign or
plaque.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOVEMBER '10, '1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to
order at 7:53 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Stone,
Roberts, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 10, 1998.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Bradley noted that the Old Town streetscape improvements are quickly
coming to completion.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:54 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
ITEM 13
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/CirCe,IV a%~/ger
Gary Thornhi~ Co'~unity Development Director
December 8, 1998
Parking In Lieu Program for Old Town Temecula (Planning Applications PA98-
0472: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment establishing the Parking In-Lieu
Program; and PA 97-0292: Parking In-Lieu Fee for Old Town Temecula)
PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
ESTABLISH THE PARKING IN-LIEU PROGRAM AND REVISE THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN
{PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0472)
o
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING THE PARKING IN-LIEU FEE WITHIN THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE BIENNIAL
REVIEW OF THE FEE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0292)
BACKGROUND:
The provision of alternative parking in the Old Town area has been under active discussion since
1997. At the September 9, 1997, the City Council decided to continue this item and appointed
members Lindemans and Ford to a subcommittee to further discuss the components of the program
with staff. The modified proposal was brought back to the Council at their November 18, 1997
meeting. However, because of additional concerns, the majority of the program was tabled, except
that the proposed modification to the Old Town parking standard were adopted for a six month tdal
period. These modified provisions expired on May 9, 1998.
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
1
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this Agenda Report is to bring the issue of the Old Town Parking In Lieu Program
back for the Council's consideration. To facilitate the Council's review of this program, staff's
proposal centers on an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to establish a long term parking
program in the Old Town core. The program allows the property owners in the Tourist Retail
Commercial (TRC) and Community Commercial Tourist Support (CCTS) Districts to develop their
property without having to provide on-site parking spaces. This proposal includes the following:
1. Create the Parking In Lieu Program within the Old Town Specific Plan;
2. Amend the Old Town Specific Plan to permanently reduce the parking requirements
in the Tourist Retail Core and Community Commercial/Tourist Support Districts; and
3. Set the amount of the Parking In Lieu Fee.
The following are more detailed discussions of these various program components.
Parkin.q In-Lieu Fee Pro.qram
The original Old Town Specific Plan envisioned a variety of incentives to encourage the revitalization
of the Old Town area. One of the Specific Plan programs was the establishment of a parking in lieu
fee that would give businesses the option of purchasing equivalent parking spaces from the City
rather than requiring that the spaces to be provided onsite. The current proposal establishes the first
step in implementing this concept.
The program would allow for a voluntary payment of an in lieu fee to provide old town area parking.
The payment of the fee would not constitute an ownership interest of parking spaces developed by
the City. Instead, payment of the fee grants the developer the right to develop property with fewer
on-site parking spaces than would otherwise be required. It is anticipated that the Parking In-Lieu
Fee would be paid at the end of the construction process. The best time to collect the fee appears
to be somewhere between final inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Any funds collected under this program would be deposited in an in lieu parking fee account and
used to reimburse the City for the cost of constructing and maintaining public parking improvements
in the Old Town area. The proposed ordinance amending the Specific Plan and setting up the
program is located in Attachment No. 1.
Parkin.q Requirements in Old Town
In December of 1997, the Council adopted a reduction in the Old Town Parking Standard for a 6-
month trial period. Staff believes that these changes should be made permanent and is proposing
that the Specific Plan be permanently amended to establish a single parking standard for all uses
within the Tourist Retail Core and Community Commercial/Tourist Support Districts. This uniform
standard would be one space per 300 square feet of gross floor area unless the Development Code
required fewer parking spaces.
Staff believes that this is essential to further induce new development in Old Town while preserving
it's pedestrian and historic character and would eliminate the need to recalculate the number of
required, or in-lieu, parking spaces when a new business moves into an existing building or suite.
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
2
Establishment of the Parking In-Lieu Fee
Based upon an analysis undertaken last year, staff is recommending that a per space fee of $10,400
be adopted. This amount is based upon the total cost of acquiring and building parking facilities.
This typical cost include land acquisition costs is based on $15 per square foot. This is based on
recent comparables including the property where the 6th Street Parking Lot is located. It should be
noted that this estimate includes the cost of appraisals, relocations (if any), and escrow/closing fees.
The cost estimates for construction and design are based on the design and construction cost for
the 6th Street Parking Lot and includes a 20% contingency. The construction costs do not include
the cost for providing restrooms, streetlights, street furniture (such as benches, bus shelters, phone
booths, trash receptacles and enclosures), sidewalks and boardwalks, street signs, and curbs
The proposed Resolution establishing a Parking In Lieu Fee of $10,400 per space is located in
Attachment No. 2. The detailed calculations for the fee are contained in Attachment No. 3. Since
the cost of raw land and construction will vary over time, staff is recommending a biennial (every two
year) review of the fee to ensure its equitability.
Future Old Town Parkin.q Facilities
The 1998-2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies additional public parking areas in the
Old Town area. One site, at the west end of 4th Street, has already been acquired and additional
properties are being sought. The costs of these projects are estimated to be approximately $5.6
million. At this time, the CIP allocates only $875,000 for the acquisition, design and construction of
future facilities. As a result, additional future funding sources will be needed to complete this project.
The Parking In Lieu Program has the potential to generate some of the additional future revenue
needed to complete these new facilities. The information from the Capital Improvement Program
is contained in Attachment No. 4.
Future Incentives
The City Council may also wish to consider various incentive options to further implement the
Parking In Lieu Program and encourage new development in the Old Town area. Some of the
potential options the Council may wish to consider include: a waiver of the in lieu fee for a certain
period of time, waiving the fee for a set number of parking spaces, or implementing the in lieu fee
in phases similar to how the DIF is being implemented.
Staff believes that some additional incentive, to reward future short term development in Old Town,
is appropriate and has the potential to accelerate it's revitalization. These incentives could also be
used to assist small businesses in their effort to locate and expand in the Old Town area. If the
Council is interested in approving some form of further parking incentive in the Old Town area, Staff
would appreciate the Council's direction on how this program should be structured.
SPECIFIC ACTIONS:
Staff is requesting that the City Council do the following:
Adopt an Ordinance amending the Old Town Specific Plan to (1) create the Parking In Lieu
Program and (2) modify the parking standards in the core area of the Old Town specific Plan;
· Adopt a Resolution establishing the fee for the Parking In Lieu Program; and,
Provide direction to staff on the scope and scale of any future parking incentive programs the
Council would like to consider.
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
3
FISCAL IMPACT:
The implementation of this program is expected to result in a minor increase in the need for staff
resources. However, no substantial direct City fiscal impacts are expected. The adoption of the
Parking In-Lieu Program will generate an additional $10,400 per space for parking facilities in the Old
Town area.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Proposed Ordinance- Page 5
Proposed Resolution - Page 10
Estimated Costs for Parking Lot Site Acquisition And Construction - Page 13
Excerpts from the Capital Improvement Program - Page15
City Council Minutes, September 9, 1997 - Page 16
City Council Minutes, November 18, 1997 - Page 17
City Council Minutes, November 25, 1997- Page 18
July 7, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 19
July 21, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 20
August 18, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 21
Planning Commission Resolutions - Page 22
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
5
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
ESTABLISH THE PARKING IN-LIEU PROGRAM AND REVISE THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0472)
THE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
follows:
Section III. F. 2. of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to read as
"2. Parkin.q
The parking requirements for the Specific Plan shall be the same as delineated in
Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code, except that parking requirements for uses
within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) and Community Commercial and Tourist Support
(CCTS) Districts shall be 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area unless the
Development Code would normally require fewer parking spaces.
Parking In Lieu Program. The developer/owner/operator of a development project
in the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) or Community Commercial Toudst Support (CCTS)
Districts may choose to pay the Parking In-Lieu Fee for a portion or all the required
on-site parking spaces pursuant to all the requirements of the Program. These
parking spaces shall be available on a first come first serve basis for
businesses/projects that have received City approval.
1)
Establishment of the Parking In Lieu Fee. The City Council shall establish the
appropriate that, in their sole determination, accurately reflects the cost of
providing parking in the Old Town area.
2) Applications for Participation in the Parking In-Lieu Program
(a)
Persons or businesses desiring to participate in the Parking In-Lieu
Program shall submit a written application for participation on a form
prescribed by the City.
(b)
The Director shall make a decision on each request to participate in
the Program, within thirty (30) days of receiving a complete
application.
(C)
The Director may approve a request to participate in the program only
if the Director makes the following findings:
(1) That approving the request to participate will not create any
significant adverse traffic safety impacts, pedestrian-vehicle
conflicts, or parking impacts; and
(2) That approving the request will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
6
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
(d)
The Director, at his or her discretion, may restrict or reduce an
applicant's overall participation in the program, as well as the timing
of said participation in the program, if the Director determines that
such a restriction is necessary to make the findings in subsection (c)
above.
(e)
The Director's written decision shall be provided to the applicant by
and shall include the number of spaces being approved and the
applicable in-lieu fee amount.
(f)
The Director may require that an agreement/covenant be recorded
with the office of the Riverside County Recorder to affirm the
applicant's participation in the program. No building permit may be
issued until this agreement has been recorded on the.
Appeals
The decision of the Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission
by any aggrieved person, in the time and manner provided in Section
17.03.090 of the Development Code.
Payments
Payments of Parking In-Lieu Program fees shall be made pursuant to the
schedule adopted by Resolution of the City Council. The fee shall be paid no
sooner than the final inspection and no later than prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, or final project sign off if no Certificate of
Occupancy is required, for the participating location.
Disposition of Funds
All funds collected from participation in the Parking In-Lieu Program shall be
deposited in a segregated Parking In-Lieu Program fund, which is hereby
established. This fund shall be used exclusively for the acquisition of land,
and the design, construction, promotion, management, operation, and
maintenance of parking facilities in the Old Town area.
Waiver of Fees
The City Council may waive or modify the Parking In-Lieu Fee, if at their sole
discretion, the waiver or modification furthers the redevelopment and
revitalization of the Old Town area. The provisions of the waiver or
modification shall be adopted by Resolution.
Non Transferability
Parking In-Lieu Fee payments paid for pursuant to the provisions of this
ordinance shall be credited only to building or property for which participation
was granted and shall not be assigned or otherwise transferred for use or
credit on any other property."
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
7
Section 2.
following findings:
Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan
and the Old Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking spaces
that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of
desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the
surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
Section 3. Environmental Determination. This project represents solely a funding
mechanism to implement previously adopted community plans. Approval of this funding mechanism
does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential physical
impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan were included
in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be
posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within
15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance,
together with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, and post
the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __th day of
,1998.
Ronald Roberrs, Mayor
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
8
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 1998, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doe
9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED RESOLUTION SETTING THE IN LIEU PROGRAM FEE
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
10
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING THE PARKING IN-LIEU FEE WITHIN THE OLD
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND AUTHORIZING THE BIENNIAL
REVIEW OF THE FEE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0292)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES,
DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to establish the amount of the
Parking In-Lieu Fee and to establish certain standards for the administration of such fees.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council after reviewing the analysis in the Staff Report,
and public testimony and information received at the noticed public hearings on this matter, make
the following findings:
A. The proposed fee is consistent with the purposes of the Old Town Specific
Plan and the General Plan and serves to foster and promote the revitalization of the Old Town Area.
B. The proposed Parking In-Lieu Fee promotes the public interest, health, safety,
convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking spaces that may
be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Parking In-Lieu Fee ensures the development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
D. The proposed Parking In-Lieu Fee does not exceed the estimated cost of
providing and establishing parking facilities in the Old Town Specific Plan Area.
Section 3. Fee. The Parking In-Lieu Fee shall be $10,400.00 per parking space.
Section 4. Periodic Review. The amount of the Parking In Lieu Fee shall be reviewed
biennially to determine its accuracy and reasonableness.
Section 5. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect on the
effective date of Ordinance No. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
11
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
th day of ,1998.
Ronald Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this th day of , 1998, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
12
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR
PARKING LOT SITE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
13
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PROPOSED COST ESTIMATION FOR A I ACRE SITE
PROVIDING 100 PARKING SPACES
SITE ACQUISITION COSTS:
Land @ $15 per Sq. Ft.
$653,400
SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS:
Design
Grading
Staking
Planters, Landscaping, and Irrigation
Lighting 25@ $3,500
Electrical
Paving 3" AC over 6" base
Striping
Driveway Approach
Design and Construction Total
$34,000
$10,000
$10,000
$180,000
$87,000
$10,000
$50,000
$1,500
$5,000
$387,500
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$1,040,900
Cost Per Space (Total Divided by 100)
$10,409
Recommended Initial Fee
$10,400
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
14
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXCERPTS FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
15
0
0
0
00000~
ooooo'
00000
~0~
0
0
0
00~
O0I
O0 COi
00000l
0 00000~
00000~
0 ~0~I
oooi
qqql
D c o
oo=
0 ~D
0>~
0'~.~
~ 0
~L r.~
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, SEPTEMBER 9, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
16
City Council Mjnutaw
Seotemh~ I. 1997
Planning Anr~!ication No. PA97-0271. An Amendment tn the C)ld Tnwn ~n~.~fic Plan
Fstahlishing the In-I ieu Parking Fee Program and Revi~ng the Parking ReOJjirements. and
Planning AJlglication No. PA97-0:)67 Establishing ~e Parking Incentives for the -¢;ixth
Rtreet Parking I nt. Ranning Anolication No. PA97-0~9~ Establishing the Parking In-Lieu
Fee for Old Town
Councilmember Stone announced he has a conflict of interest due to property ownership
in Old Town.
Associate Ranner Saied Nasseh presented the staff report, presenting revised
resolutions and a revised ordinance modifying provisions of the incentive program.
Councilmember Lindemans expressed concern regarding the pay-back provisions of this
program.
Housing and Redevelopment Manager John Meyer explained the intention of the
incentive program is to provide a method by which property owners could develop their
property with a reduced number of parking spaces and could pay fees in lieu of the
required s,oaces and receive credit based on the new public parking facility at 6th Street.
City Manager Bradley suggested continuing this item to allow for further discussion.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 8:13 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Counciimember Ford, to
continue the public hearing to the first meeting in November. The motion was
unanimously carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Robarts, seconded by Mayor Birdsall to appoint
Councilmembers tindemans and Ford to serve on an ad hoc sub-committee to work with
staff on several areas of concern expressed by Council. The motion was unanimously
carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining.
n~'~ ..... dulti
Community Dave ant Director Ga~ Thor ' presented the ~aff re~n.
Mayor Bird~ll opened the pu ' eating at 8:29 PM. Having no requests to ~eak,
Mayor Birdsall closed th ' at 8:29 PM.
It was mo ouncilmember ~ndemans, to
~tee%Oi%Og~7 .~ 09~4~7
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, NOVEMBER 18, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
17
MOTION: Councilman R~
matter be reagendized fo
moved that the matter be forwarded to the
November 25, 1997, City
Commission for review and that the
Council meeting in order for the ~uncil to take the ap:
Lindemans and voice vote ~nanimous apF
action. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Clarifying his previous comment,
his concern to not create an additional
expressed his support of the intent to install stop signs but relayed
problem in an effort to delete an existing one.
At 8:10 P.M., Mayor Bip
8:26 P.M.
a recess and reconvened the meeting at
the
P.M.
At
of Te
the City Council and reconvened in joint session with the Redevelopment Agency of
to discuss the Item >elow. The Redevelopment Agency meeting concluded at 8:39
City Ouuncll reconvened to regularly sd,~duted City Council business.
Planning Application No. PA97-0221, An Amendment to the Old Town
Specific Plan establishina the In-Lieu Parkina Fee Proqram and Revisinq
the Parking Requirements, and Plannina Application No. PA97-0267
establishinq the Parkinq Incentives for the Sixth Street Parking Lot,
PlanninCl Application No. PA97-0292 establishinq the Parkin.q In-Lieu
Fee In Old Town
3.1 Introduce and Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING (PLANNING APPUCATION NO. PA97-0221), AN AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN ESTABLISHING THE IN-LIEU PARKING FEE PROGRAM AND REVISING THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
3.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0292), SETTING THE IN-LIEU PARKING FEE
WITHIN THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CONDUCT BI-
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE IN-LIEU FEE.
MinutesU 11897 10
3.3 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0267), ESTABLISHING THE OLD TOWN
PARKING INCENTIVE PROGRAM
3.4 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CAUFORNIA, APPROVING (PLANNING APPUCATION NO. PA97-0267), ESTABUSHING THE OLD
TOWN PARKING INCENTIVE PROGRAM
MOTION: Coundlmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilman Ford, moved to continue recommendation 3.1 to the next
meeting and table recommendations 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At this time, the Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
Considering the number of individuals present for Agenda Item No. 21 and No. 23, Mayor Birdsall denied a request to
discuss Agenda Item No. 23 out of order.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
21.
App No, 1 and Appeal No. 2 of Planninq Application No. PA97-0298
('Zev Bu an Entertainment Project) - the construction of a 103,564 square foot, 4,800 seat arena and
associated rovements (hardscape, parkinq, landscapinq .a~roadways) and an addendum to a
previously Ce ' ed EIR of the Old Town Redevelopm~iect, located west of Old Town Temecula (100
eet), 700 feet south of Rid ark DriveNincent Moraqa Drive and east of the City's
Westem Border, with~ the Westside Spe ' c Plan
RECOMMENDATION
21.1 Adopt a re '
LUTION NO. 97-129
A HE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
LAN -APPEAL NO. 1), MODIFYING CONDITION
NO. PA97-0298 APPROVING A CHANGE TO
LANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
Minutes\l 11897 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, NOVEMBER 25, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
18
15.2 Entertain a motion from the City Councilmembers to elect the Mayor Pro Tem to
preside until the end of calendar year 1998.
MOTION: :ilman Stone moved to nominate Mayor Pro Tem Roberts as ayor. The motion
was seconded Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval.
MOTION: CoL Ione moved to nominate Councilm;
motion was seconded b~ ouncilman Lindemans and vo
as Mayor Pro Tem. The
reflected unanimous approval.
16. Murrieta Creek
Update was given at the
input at this time.
18, 1997, City Council information; no additional
At 7:58 P.M., the recessed to convene the Temecula Community Services
District and the pment Agency. During Redevelopment Agency meeting, the
Council remai~ in joint session with the Agency in'~er to discuss the following joint
item:
Joint Session with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
PlanninQ Application No. PA 97-0221, Amending Section F.2, Parking of the Old
Town Specific Plan to Establish In-Lieu Fee ProQram and Revise the Parkinq
ReQuirements (Planning Application No. PA97-0221 )
1.1 Read by the title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA 97-0221), AN AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN ESTABLISHING THE IN-LIEU PARKING FEE
PROGRAM AND REVISE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 97-0221)
Councilman Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue due to property
ownership in Old Town.
Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per written material
of record), advising that the proposed resolution is for introduction and first reading only. In
response to Councilman Comerchero, Community Development Director Thornhill noted that
the proposed amendment would decrease the overall parking spaces for Old Town by
approximately 15% to 20%, including future parking spaces. Mr. Thornhill clarified that the
existing Ordinance would require McDonald's to provide approximately three times the amount
of parking spaces than what would be required under the proposed Ordinance.
Minutes/112597
Expressing concern with approving any amendments which may not adequately represent the
City's long-term goal with regard to parking in Old Town, Councilman Lindemans relayed his
opposition to this resolution and expressed his desire to develop a plan which would encourage
individuals to walk through Old Town.
Advising that proposals have been requested from consultants for a market study in Old Town
in order to properly determine the appropriate mix of restaurants, retail, etc., Redevelopment
Director McLarney informed the Councilmembers that the approval of the proposed resolution
would be necessary in order for McDonald's and other businesses to open.
Councilman Comerchero echoed Councilman Lindemans' concern of approving an Ordinance
which may not accurately reflect the City's long-term goal.
In an effort to address Councilman Lindemans' concern, City Manager Bradley suggested that
the proposed Ordinance be approved with the addition of a six-month sunset clause to which
Councilman Lindemans indicated his support.
City Attorney Thorson noted that a public hearing was held with regard to this matter at the
November 18, 1997, City Council meeting; that the matter was continued to the November 25,
1997, City Council meeting; and that because Councilman Comerchero was present at the
initial public hearing, he may vote on the matter. At this time, City Attorney Thorson read the
Ordinance.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Ordinance No. 97- for introduction and
first reading with the addition of a six-month sunset clause. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exceDtion of
Councilman Stone who abstained.
the City Council adjourned the Redevelopm Agency meeting and reconvened
with regularly sc uled City Council business.
~-~-~.
Departmental Reports
None given.
City Manager's Report
None given.
City Attorn
None ~ven.
At 8:29 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, December 9, 1997,
at 7:00 P.M,. in City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Minutes/112597
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
JULY 7, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
\\TEMEC_FS2OI\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
19
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 7, 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0221,
Old Town Specific Plan Amendment,
Parking in Lieu Fee
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
ArtOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendment) based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of an amendment to the Old Town Specific
Plan to allow for the payment of the parking in-lieu fee in place of
the required Darking spaces.
LOCATION: Old Town
BACKGROUND
By adopting Old Town Specific Plan, the City Council committed to provide public parking lots
to attract tourists and residents to Old Town. The studies in the Specific Plan identified a
short-fall of 360 parking spaces at the build-out of the Tourist Retail Core. The purchase,
design, and construction of the Sixth Street Parking Lot/Restrooms with 78 parking spaces was
the first step towards providing the needed parking spaces in Old Town. The 1997-98 Capital
Improvement Program includes approximately $875,000 for acquisition, design, and
construction of future parking spaces in Old Town. The Specific Plan.also encourages the
adoption of an in-lieu parking fee to help the City pay for the construction of these parking lots.
DISCUSSION
The proposed amendment adds the language necessary to give developers in Old Town a choice
between providing the required number of on-site parking spaces or paying the in-lieu parking
fee. It should be noted that the payment of this fee is voluntary and does not constitute an
ownership interest of parking spaces developed by the City. Rather, the payment of an in-lieu
fee grants the developer the right to develop property with fewer on-site parking spaces than
would otherwise be revised. The 'amount of the fee will be set by the City Council.
R:\OLDTOWI'q~.MDSPPEICPC 7/16/97
This amendment deletes the following language in Section i11. F. 2., Parking, of the Old Town
Specific Plan:
All parking requirements in the Specific Plan area shall be
delineated in Chapter 9.24, Parking and Loading, of the
Development Code unless specifically regulated differently in this
Specific Plan. See section on Public Parking Program.
This amendment proposes the following language for this Section:
All parking requirements in the Specific Plan area shall be
delineated in Chapter 17.24, Parking and Loading, of the
Development Code. However, instead of the required number of
on-site parking spaces, the developer/owner/operator may choose
to pay the parking in-lieu fee for a portion or all the required on-
site parking spaces.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan since it implements the Old Town
Specific Plan and its goals and policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan does not have the potential to cause a
significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town
Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific
Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and
its environs. Further, this project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant
to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates
that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on
the environment. It also states that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the
activity is not subject to CEQA. This amendment complies with the requirements for this
section as there is no possibility that the adoption of this amendment may have a significant
effect on the environment.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 3
Exhibit A (Ordinance No. 97- ) - Blue Page 6
R:\OLDTOWlq~d~DSPPRK. PC 7/16/97 c.,ul 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
JULY 21, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
\\TEMEC_FS2OI\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBYECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND
Planning Commission
Saied Naa~h, Associate Planner~
luly 21, 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0221, Parking In Lieu Fee
ORIGINAL
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
ADOFr Resolution No. 9% recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendment) based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
The Planning Commission continued this item from the July 7, 1997 agenda to the luly 21, 1997
meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following Findings have replaced the Findings in the previous Staff Report's Resolution:
1. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
2. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience or welfare of the City.
3. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the
anticipated land use developments.
4. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be
compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Attachments:
i. Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 2
2. Planning Commission Staff Report,/uly 7, 1997 - Blue Page 5
R:\OLDTO~PPRK.PCI 7116197 m ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
AUGUST 18, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
\\TEMEC_FS2OI\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
21
TO:
Planning Commission
MEMORANDUM
ORIGINAL
FROM:
DATE:
Saied Naaseh, Associate PlannerVe/
August 18, 1997
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA97-0221 An Amendment to the Old Town
Specific Plan Establishing the In-Lieu Parking Fee Program and Revising the
Parking Requirements, and Planning Application No. PA 97-0267 Establishing
the Parking Incentives for the 6th Street Parking Lot
RECOMMENDATION:
The Redevelopment Agency Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendment Establishing the
Parking In-Ueu Fee Program and Revising the Parking
Requirements) based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0267
(Establishing the Parking Incentives for the 6th Street
Parking Lot) based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
BACKGROUND
Staff requested the Planning Commission continue this item off-calendar from the July 21,
1997 agenda. This request was based on staff's further consultation with the City Attorney.
As a result, the proposed Parking in-Lieu Fee Program has been amended, the parking
requirements in Old Town are being revised, and a new parking incentive program is also being
offered.
DISCUSSION
This item contains two separate elements which are designed to induce development while
preserving the historic character of Old Town. The first element contains two parts which are
proposed as amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. They include the establishment of the
In-Lieu Parking Fee Program and a new standard for calculating parking requirements in 01d
Town. The second element is the 6th Street Parking Lot Incentive Program.
Parking In-Lieu Fee Program
R:\OLDTOW'NXAMDSPPRK.PC3 8/12/97
This program gives developers in the Tourist Retail Commercial (TRC) zone in Old Town a
choice between providing the required number of on-site parking spaces or paying the Parking
In-Lieu Fee. Payment of the Parking In-Lieu Fee is voluntary and does not constitute an
ownership interest of parking spaces developed by the City. Rather, the payment of an in-lieu
fee grants the developer the right to develop property with fewer on-site parking spaces than
would otherwise be required, The amount of the fee will be set by the City Council. This fee
is paid prior to the issuance of the Building Permits. The Director of Redevelopment determines
the whether a project can pay the in-lieu fee for all the required parking spaces or some on-site
parking should be provided.
Parking Requirements in Old Town
Currently, the Old Town Specific Plan references the Development Code for the calculation of
the required number of parking spaces. Since the physical development in Old Town is very
unique and unlike conventional commercial development, staff is proposing a new standard for
parking requirements in Old Town. The proposed language establishes a single standard of one
space per 300 square feet of gross floor area and replaces the different standards for different
uses currently included in the Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC), Civic (OTC), Community
Commercial (CC), Tourist Retail Core (TRC), and Community Commercial and Tourist Support
(CCTS) unless the Development Code requires a fewer number of parking spaces for the same
use (Refer to Attachment No. 4 for the Development Code Parking Requirements).
The proposed standard will result in a fewer number of required parking spaces from uses such
as restaurants, hotels, theaters, and cinemas. This reduction in the number of required parking
spaces is essential to induce development in Old Town and to preserve the pedestrian and
historic character of Old Town. Furthermore, this single standard will eliminate the necessity
of recalculating the number of required parking spaces and calculating the Parking In-Lieu Fee
every time a new businesses moves into a building or suite.
6th Street Parking Lot Incentive Program
This incentive program allows the property owners in the Tourist Retail Commercial (TRC) zone
to develop their property without having to provide on-site parking spaces or pay the Parking
In-Lieu Fee. This incentive extends to both new construction and expansion of existing
buildings. Initially, staff is proposing this incentive to be for 50 parking spaces. The City will
establish a priority list for these parking spaces and will offer them on a first come first served
bases at the time of issuance of Building Permits. The Program requires an the applicant to
keelD an active Building Permit in order to be kept on the priority list. The City Council may, at
its discretion, offer the balance of the 80 parking spaces in the 6th Street Parking Lot for the
incentive program.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed amendment and incentive program are consistent with the General Plan since it
implements the Old Town Specific Plan and its goals and policies.
R:\OLDTOM/'N~MDSPpRK.pC3 8/12/97 sn 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment, Any
potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous
Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact
Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs.
FINDINGS
Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old
Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing
public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character
which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old
Town.
Parking Incentive Program
The incentive program is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific
Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
The proposed incentive program would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public
parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
The proposed incentive program induces the development and redevelopment in Old
Town because it provides a catalyst for development and redevelopment.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 4
Exhibit A (Ordinance No. 97- ) - Blue Page 7
Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 13
Planning Commission Staff Report, July 21, 1997 - Blue Page 17
Development Code Parking Requirements - Blue Page 18
R:\OLDTOW'NXAIvG)SPPRK.PC~ 8/1219'7 rn 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 11
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS
\\TEMEC_FS2OI\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Parking In Lieu Fee CC3.doc
22
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-018
A RESOLUTION OF TIt'F. PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION Ill. F. 2., PARKING, OF Tit'F. OLD
TOWN SPECII~IC PLAN TO ESTABLT~qIt ~ PARKING IN-
LIEU FEE PROGRAM AND REVISE TFrE PARKING
REQUIREMENTS CPLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0221)
THF~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Old Town Specific Plan that requires on-site
parking spaces for developments and encourages adoption of a Parking In-Lieu Fee Program; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Old Town Specific Plan to provide a choice for
developers in Old Town to either provide on-site parking as required by the Old Town Specific
Plan or pay the Parking In-Lieu Fee to preserve the historic character of Old Town; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on July 7, 1997 and
July 21, 1997, and August 18, 1997 on the issue of recommending approval or denial of this
amendment.
NOW, TFI'EREFORE, TFIF. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of an Ordinance approVing
this amendment, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the
Old Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing
public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
R:\OLDTOWNXAMDSPPRK.PC3 11/20/97 m 5
Section 2. This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the
environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included
in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final
Environmental Impact Report of the City 6eneral Plan for the City and its environs.
Section 3. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Ordinance approving the Amendment, Exhibit "A" , substantially in the form attached
hereto.
Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be
transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
Section 5.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th of August, 1997.
I FFEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSTAIN: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
FAHEY, GUERRIERO,
SLAVEN, SOLTYSIAK
MILLER
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
.
:,. /,-,7
.,.,~_..,~.. ', ./f / ,, ~ _
Debbie gbnoske, Secretary
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-035
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH'E
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA THE 6TH
PARKING LOT INCENTIVE PROGRAM (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0221)
TH'E PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES FI'EREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WH'EREAS, the City Council adopted the Old Town Specific Plan that requires on-site
parking spaces for developments and encourages adoption of a Parking In-Lieu Fee; and,
WFrEREAS, the City Council will adopt an Ordinance establishing the Parking In-Lieu
Program; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council will adopt a resolution creating the Parking in-Lieu Fee;
and,
WHE~REAS, it is necessary to encourage development and redevelopment in Old Town
by providing incentives; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on July 7, 1997 and
July 21, 1997, and August 18, 1997 on the issue of recommending approval or denial of this
amendment.
NOW, TFIEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TB'E CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of a Resolution approving
this Incentive Program, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The incentive program is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town
Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed incentive program would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public
parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed incentive program induces the developmere and redevelopment in Old
Town because it provides a catalyst for development and redevelopment.
Section 2. The Incentive Program includes the following standards:
R:\OLDTOVqNXAMDSPPRK.PC3 11/20/97 m 14
A. Fifty (50) spaces in the 6th Street Parking Lot shall be made available to the
landowners/developers of expanding existing buildings or new construction within the Tourist
Retail Commercial Zone (TRC) in Old Town to satisfy their parking requirements. These spaces
shall not be designated to any particular business or property and shall be permitted to be used by
the public.
B. The City shall establish a priority list for the 50 parking spaces on a first come first
served bases at the time a Building Permit is issued for each project.
C. Projects which allow their Building Permit to expire shall be removed from the
priority list. At the time these projects receive their Building Permits upon re-application, they
shall be placed at the bottom of the priority list.
D. Projects that are under construction but do not receive a Certificate of Occupancy
within 360 days of the issuance of the original Building Permit shall be removed from the priority
list and shall be placed on the bottom of the priority list unless the Director approves a one time
180 day extension.
E. The City Council may, at its discretion by Resolution, include the remaining
parking spaces within the 6th Street Parking Lot in the Incentive Program.
F. The Incentive Program shall be administered by the Director of Redevelopment
Department.
Section 3. This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the
environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included
in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final
Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs.
Section 4. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Resolution approving the Incentive Program.
Section 5. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be
transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
R:\OLDTOWN'htdvff~PPRK.PC3 11/20/97 m 15
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 18th of August, 1997.
I H'EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, GUERRIERO,
SLAVEN, SOLTYSIAK
NOES: 1
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MILLER
ABSTAIN: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\OLDTOWN~MDSPPRK.PC3 11/20/97 m 16
ITEM 14
APPROVAL ,~~
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Ron Bradley, City Manager
December 8, 1998
Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst,~/(~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99, TO BE EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 6, 1999, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESOLUTIONS
97-94 AND 98-30.
BACKGROUND: On May 26 and June 23, 1998, the City Council discussed the recommended
increases in both residential and non-residential development impact fees ("DIF"). The proposed
Building Cost Index adjustments, which would be applied to both residential and non-residential
development, were based on Section 5 of Resolution No. 97-94, which was amended by Resolution
No. 98-30. Under these resolutions, fees for both residential and non-residential development shall
be adjusted by the average Engineering News Record Building Cost Index ("BCI") calculated for the
twelve month period prior to May 1st of the year in which the change will be effective. Annual BCI
adjustments can be either increases or decreases, depending on development activity. The BCI
to apply to the fees for this year's adjustment is an increase by 1.1 %. The calculated fees applying
only this escalation factor are provided as Attachment B.
In addition to the BCI adjustments, Council discussed the 10% increase in non-residential DIF. This
additional 10% per year escalation was based on the Council's having adopted a schedule for non-
residential fees which started at 36% of the fees recommended in the David M. Griffith (DMG) DIF
Study for fiscal year 1997-98, and increased by 10% each year through the year 2003-04. This
schedule is provided as Attachment C, and shows how each year a percentage of the base fee
(60%, 70%, 80%, etc.) is taken to establish the new base DIF for non-residential development for
each year. This number then has the BCI increase applied to it, which could ultimately result in an
overall increase of from 10% to 15% for non-residential development impact fees.
After considerable discussion during these two meetings, Council referred this agenda item back
to Staff so that vacancy rates for industrial development could be analyzed to take into consideration
the impacts of DIF on development. This analysis, which was provided to the Council on July 15,
1998, under separate cover, showed that vacancy rates are dynamic, and can vary by several
percentage points depending on when the rates are recorded. The analysis also showed that
Temecula's vacancy rates and available square footages consistently declined from 1993 through
1997.
In order to have vacancy rate information readily available for the Council in the future, Staff has
contacted an independent consulting firm, Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services,
which routinely researches communities to provide this type of information. If the Council would
prefer to have additional information regarding current vacancy rates prior to considering the
proposed increase in industrial DIF, then Lee & Associates can provide this information in
approximately 60 days from the time they are authorized to commence this work. The proposal from
Lee & Associates is to perform an Industrial Survey of Temecula's businesses, focusing on the
vacancy/availability rates for existing buildings, for a total cost of $5,000 plus approximately $800
in expenses for a college intern to collect the data. The estimated date for bringing this information
and a recommendation back to the Council is February 1999.
Based on the information contained herein, Staff recommends that the BCI of 1.1 % be applied to
both residential and non-residential DIF, and that the 10% increase pursuant to Resolution 97-94
also be applied to non-residential DIF.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the Council sets the fees with only the BCI applied, then, based on the
building projections used in the Capital Improvement Program Budget, the City would have a
projected* gross DIF revenue of $1,520,178 for the remaining months of FY 1998-99 (February
through June). If the fees are set applying the BCI to residential development and both the BCI and
10% escalation factor to non-residential development, then the City will have a projected* gross DIF
revenue of $1,607,663 (see Attachment E).
*Note: Projections have been prorated to the remaining months for FY 1998-99 (February
through June), assuming the fees become effective on February 6, 1999.
Attachments:
A. Resolution No. 98-__
B. Fees Calculated with BCI Applied
C. Exhibit B from Resolution No, 97-94
D. Comparison of DIF Escalation Scenarios
E. DIF Gross Revenue Projections for FY 1998-99
RESOLUTION NO. 98-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99, TO
BE EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 6, 1999, PURSUANT TO CHAFFER
15.06 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND
RESOLUTIONS 97-94 AND 98-30.
NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1.
declare as follows:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
A. On May 27, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-09 establishing
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Public Facilities Development Impact Fee CDIF"),
which was modified by Ordinance No. 97-14 on August 26, 1997, and was further modified by
Ordinance No. 98-05 on April 14, 1998.
B. On May 27, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 97-45 which
established the Development Impact Fees. This Resolution was restated and modified by Resolution
97-94 on August 12, 1997, and was further modified by Resolution No. 98-30 on April 14, 1998.
C. The City Council adopted residential DIF as recommended in a Development
Impact Fee Study conducted by David M. Griffith and Associates CDMG"), and adopted non-
residential DIF at 36% of the amount recommended by DMG.
D. Resolution 98-30 provides for an automatic annual adjustment of both
residential and non-residential DIF based on the percentage increase or decrease, if any, of the
Engineering News Record Building Cost Index CBCI") for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area BCI
for the twelve month period prior to May 1 of the year in which the change will be effective.
E. Exhibit B to Resolution 98-30 contains projected fees for seven (7) years with
no escalation applied to residential DIF and an escalation of 10% per year applied to non-residential
DIF.
F. Non-residential development in Temecula has not declined since DIF were
adopted in May of 1997.
Section 2. Exhibit A to Resolution 97-94 is hereby amended by Exhibit A to this
Resolution. This amended Exhibit A sets forth the levels of development impact fees for the City
of Temecula to collect for residential and non-residential development effective February 6, 1999,
pursuant to the schedule of adjustments established in Resolutions 97-94 and 98-30.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
8th day of December, 1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1998, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Component
Street System
Improvements
Type of Land Use/1
Amount of Fee Per Unit
Or Square Foot/2
Residential Attached $517
Residential Detached $737
Office $0.80
Retail Commercial $2.47
Service Commercial $1.24
Business Park/Industrial $0.59
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Residential Attached $78
Residential Detached $110
Office $0.12
Retail Commercial $0.37
Service Commercial $0.19
Business Park/Industrial $0.09
Corporate Facilities
Residential Attached $119
Residential Detached $224
Office $0.04
Retail Commercial $0.10
Service Commercial $0.06
Business Park/Industrial $0.03
Fire Protection
Facilities
Residential Attached $42
Residential Detached $56
Office $0.01
Retail Commercial $0.02
Service Commercial $0.02
Business Park/Industrial $0.01
Park and Recreation
Improvements
Residential Attached $1,222
Residential Detached $1,629
Office $0.00
Retail Commercial $0.00
Service Commercial $0.00
Business Park/Industrial $0.00
Libraries
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE PER
UNIT
Residential Attached $158
Residential Detached $210
Office $0.00
Retail Commercial $0.00
Service Commercial $0.00
Business Park/Industrial $0.00
Residential Attached $2,136
Residential Detached $2,966
Office $0.98
Retail Commercial $2.97
Service Commercial $1.50
Business Park/Industrial $0.72
l/Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan.
2/Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential development
are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CALCULATED
WITH BCI ONLY APPLIED
ESCALATION
COMPONENT TYPE OF LAND USE BCI ONLY
Street System
Improvements
Residential Attached 517
Residential Detached 737
Office 0.69
Retail Commercial 2.12
Service Commercial 1.06
Business Park/Industrial 0.50
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Residential Attached 78
Residential Detached 110
Office 0.10
Retail Commercial 0.32
Service Commercial 0.16
Business Park/Industrial 0.08
Corporate Facilities
Residential Attached 119
Residential Detached 224
Office 0.04
Retail Commercial 0.09
Service Commercial 0.05
Business Park/Industrial 0.03
Fire Protection
Facilities
Residential Attached 42
Residential Detached 56
Office 0.01
Retail Commercial 0.02
Service Commercial 0.01
Business Park/Industrial 0.01
Park and Recreation
Improvements
Residential Attached 1,222
Residential Detached 1,629
Office 0
Retail Commercial 0
Service Commercial 0
Business Park/Industrial 0
Libraries
Residential Attached 158
Residential Detached 210
Office 0
Retail Commercial 0
Service Commercial 0
Business Park/Industrial 0
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE PER
UNIT
Residential Attached 2,136
Residential Detached 2,966
Office 0.84
Retail Commercial 2.55
Service Commercial 1.28
Business Park/Industrial 0.62
NOTE: Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
ATTACHMENT B
EXHIBIT B
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
STREET SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE*
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
729 729 729 729 729 729 729 729
511 511 511 511 511 511 511 5ll
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 729
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 511
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 1.137
RETAIL COMM 3.498
SERVICE COMM 1.749
BUS PARK/IND 0.830
0.682 0.796 0.910 1.023 1.137 1.251 1.364 0.887
2.099 2.449 2.798 3.148 3.498 3.848 4.198 2.728
1.049 1.224 i.399 1.574 1.749 !.924 2.099 1.364
0.498 0.581 0.664 0.747 0.830 0.913 0.996 0.647
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
BASE
FEE* 1997/98
SYSTEMS
1998/99
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
109 109 109 109 109 109
77 77 77 77 77 77
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 109 109
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 77 77
!ON-RESIDENTIAL
FF ICE 0.171 0.103
-:ETAIL COMM 0.527 0.316
SERVICE COMM 0.263 0.158
BUS PARK/IND 0.125 0.075
2004/05
109
77
0.120 0.137 0.154 0.171 0.188 0.205 0.134
0.369 0.422 0.474 0.527 0.580 0.632 0.411
0.184 0.210 0.237 0.263 0.289 0.316 0.205
0.088 0.100 0.113 0.125 0.138 0.150 0.098
CORPORATE FACILITIES
BASE
FEE * 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
299 ~9 ~ 222 222 2~ 222 222
118 118 118 118 i18. 118 118 118
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED
2004/05
222
118
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.059 0.035 0.041 0.047 0.053 0.059 0.065 0.071 0.046
RETAIL COMM 0.147 0.088 0.103 0.118 0.132 0.147 0.162 0.176 0.115
SERVICE COMM 0.082 0.049 0.057 0.0~i6 0.074 0.082 0.090 0.098 0.064
BUS PARK/IND 0.049 0.029 0.034 0.039 0.044" 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.038
* BaseJ~e is 60% of the maximum fie calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted
by David M Grif~th & Associates. Inc.
ATTACHMENT C
r:\k u h n sa \difikarel 1. wb2\sphere 04-Aug-97
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
BASE
FEE*
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 55
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 42
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.017 0.010
RETAIL COMM 0.028 0.017
SERVICE COMM 0.023 0.014
BUS PARK/IND 0.020 0.012
0.012 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.020 0.013
0.020 0.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.034 0.022
0.016 0.018 0.021 0.023 0.025 0.028 0.018
0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.016
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE* 1997/98
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 1,611 1,611
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 1,209 1,209
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000
SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000
~- US PARK/IND 0.000 0.000
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002~3 2003/04 2004/05
1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,61l 1,611 1,611
1,209 1,209 1,209 i,209 1,209 1,209 1,209
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LIBRARIES
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208
156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED
2004/05
208
156
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BUS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000
* Base fee is 60% of the maxtmum./be calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted
by DaWd M Grif~th & ,associates, Inc.
r:\kuhnsa%di~karell .wb2\sphere 04~Aug-97
COMPONENT
COMPARISON OF DIF ESCALATION SCENARIOS
ESCALATION
CURRENT ESCALATION BCI+10% FOR
TYPE OF LAND USE FEES BCIONLY NON-RESIDENTIAL
Street System
Improvements
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
511 517 517
729 737 737
0.682 0.69 0.80
2.099 2.12 2.47
1.049 1.06 1.24
0.498 0.50 0.59
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
77 78 78
109 110 110
0.103 0.10 0.12
0.316 0.32 0.37
0,158 0.16 0.19
0.075 0.08 0.09
Corporate Facilities
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
118 119 119
222 224 224
0,035 0.04 0.04
0,088 0.09 0.10
0,049 0.05 0.06
0,029 0.03 0.03
Fire Protection
Facilities
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
42 42 42
55 56 56
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.017 0.02 0.02
0,014 0.01 0.02
0,012 0.01 0.01
Park and Recreation
Improvements
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
1209 1222 1,222
1611 1629 1,629
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
Libraries
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
156 158 158
208 210 210
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0 0.00
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE PER
UNIT
Residential Attached
Residential Detached
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
2113 2136 2136
2934 2966 2966
0.83 0.84 0.98
2.52 2.55 2.97
1.27 1.28 1.50
0.614 0.62 0.72
NOTE: Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
ATFACHMENT D
uJ
01LU
¢:~LLI
~- LU
U-LU o00 oooo a0 ,~i
rrZ LU co o4cocotn
U, '3 Z c~ ~r~e~zc~ tU
>
CO>, w m
o4
WEB LU ~ d ' ' '
'~UJ <l:Z
Ou, a:O
LUUJ +
ZLL oc0 oooo
LUUj ~ c~ iT, u~ooo
OLU
u-O ~ z
I~ Z CI ~ LU
~ ~ Z LU
mm 0 o~o rr
me
n'n' On'c~m i--
ITEM 15
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Mar a,g,,~
Gary Thornhill,'J~m~u'nity Development Director
December 8, 1998
Multi Species Habitat Conservation Planning Agreement
PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the City's participation in the Multi Species Habitat
Conservation Planning Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign
the Agreement
BACKGROUND:
On July 7, 1998, the County Board of Supervisors approved a Revised Multiple Species Planning
Agreement that had been proposed by the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA).
This Agreement is expected to provide the operational framework for addressing long term multiple
species preservation throughout Western Riverside County. The only major change in this final
version of the Agreement is the provision for Riverside County, not the RCHCA, to be the California
Environmental Quality Act Lead Agency for the eventual Environmental Impact Report that will be
required for the plan.
FISCALIMPACT:
No direct fiscal impacts have been identified at this time. When elected officials and City staff
participate in this future multi-species effort, some staff resources will need to be committed to this
process.
Attachments:
Proposed Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Planning
Agreement - Page 2
R:\STAFFRPT\Multi Species Agreement Agenda Report.doc
1
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING AGREEMENT
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
MULTIPLE SPECIES
MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING AGREEMENT
This Agreement ("Planning Agreement") is made and entered into this day
of by and among the United States Department of the Interior
("Interior"), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service"), the United States
Bureau of Land Management ("BLM"), the California Resources Agency ("Agency") and
the California Department of Fish and Game ("Department"), the County of Riverside,
California, ("County") and the Cities of Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley,
Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, and Temecula (collectively, the Cities).
1. RECITALS
1.1 COUNTY and CITIES
The County and the Cities are existing members of the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency (RCHCA), a Joint Powers Authority created pursuant to the
provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State
of California relating to the joint exercise of powers common to public agencies. The
RCHCA was created by and among the County of Riverside and the Cities of Corona,
Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, and Temecula to plan
for, acquire, administer, operate and maintain land and facilities for the Stephens'
kangaroo rat, a federal and state listed species.
1.2 SERVICE
The Service is the agency of the United States Department of the Interior authorized
and empowered by Congress to enforce the terms of FESA, and to enter into agreements
with states, local governments, and other entities in order to conserve ecosystems of this
country and the flora and fauna contained therein.
1.3 BLM
The BLM is an agency of the United States Department of the Interior authorized and
empowered by Congress to manage over 17 million acres of land owned by the United
States within the State of California. Included among its responsibilities as a manager of
federal lands is the duty to conserve and protect the biological and natural resource values
located upon those lands, including animal and plant species and the habitats which
support them.
1.4 DEPARTMENT
The Department is the agency of the State of California authorized and empowered
to enforce the terms of CESA, to act as trustee for the flora and fauna of this state on
behalf of its residents, and to enter into agreements with the federal and local governments
and other entities for habitat conservation purposes under the terms of CESA and the
Natural Community Conservation Planning Act.
1.5 NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLANNING ACT
The Legislature of the State of California announced its intention to promote the
proactive protection of wildlife and flora and their habitats by the enactment of the Natural
Community Conservation Planning Act. California Fish and Game Code, Section 2800, et
seq. ("NCCP Act"). Pursuant to the NCCP Act, local, state and federal agencies are
2
encouraged to prepare and implement Natural Commuaity Conservation Plans (NCCP's)
to provide comprehensive management and conservation of multiple species and their
habitats in one plan, rather than become involved in the preparation of many individual
plans for specific species as those species become in danger of extinction and become
listed pursuant to either FESA or CESA.
1.5.1 COMPATIBILITY WITH FESA AND CESA
The NCCP Act provides that NCCP's shall be compatible with FESA and
CESA~ and thus may serve as the basis for incidental take permits pursuant to Section
10(a) of FESA and management authorization pursuant to Sections 2081 of CESA and
Section 2835 of the NCCP Act. Furthermore, the NCCP Act provides that after the
approval of a NCCP, the Department may authorize the taking of any species identified
therein for whose benefit habitat is conserved and managed.
1.5.2 ENDORSEMENT OF NCCP ACT
Interior, the Agency, the Service and the Department each have announced
that they enthusiastically endorse the provisions of the NCCP Act and have encouraged
the County and the Cities to adopt the NCCP process as a means of proactively protecting
species and their habitats.
1.5.3 CONCURRENCE WITH GOALS OF THE NCCP ACT
The County and the Cities concur with the goals of the NCCP Act and have
determined that it may be the proper vehicle for the RCHCA to provide appropriate
protection for the range of biological resources within its jurisdiction while at the same time
safeguarding the economic, social, health, safety and property rights of its residents and
property owners.
3
1.5.4 NO INTERIM ENROLLMENT IN NCCP PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF
MSHCP
The Planning Agreement constitutes the agreement to prepare a Natural
Community Conservation Plan pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2810. The
execution of this Planning Agreement does not constitute enrollment in the NCCP program
for the purposes of using the federal Endangered Species Act 4(d) Rule for take of coastal
California gnatcatchers during the plan preparation nor require the use of the Process
Guidelines. However, the parties acknowledge that the Conservation Guidelines will be
used for reserve design; provided, however, that in no event shall any habitat use limitation
set forth in the Process Guidelines be mandated for use in the standards adopted for
reserve design. The parties further agree that the County and the Cities shall not provide
reimbursement to the Department for its participation in the planning phase of the MSHCP
as provided in Section 2810 of the NCCP Act.
1.6 PREVIOUS CONSERVATION AGREEMENTS
Parties to this Agreement have previously entered into interagency conservation
agreements which support the goals and purposes stated herein. Federal and state
agency participants in this Agreement are signatories to the 1991 Agreement on Biological
Diversity which provides a framework for collaborative conservation planning on a regional
scale. The RCHCA, Service, BLM, and Department are signatories to the 1994
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Interagency Cooperation and the Development
of a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan
within Riverside County. That 1994 agreement called for the parties to work together
following approval of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan to prepare a
multiple species habitat conservation plan for RCHCA member agencies.
1.7 EXISTING HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS
1.7.1 SKR HCP
The RCHCA has prepared and is implementing the terms of the Long Term
Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat CSKR HCP") and has been
issued an incidental take permit pursuant to Section 10(a) of FESA and a Management
Authorization by the Department pursuant to Section 2081 of CESA. The SKR HCP
established a regional system of reserves comprising more than 41,000 acres which will
be managed in perpetuity for the benefit of SKR and other resident species.
1.7.2 SOUTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
In partnership with the Metropolitan Water District ("MWD"), the RCHCA is
participating in the implementation of the Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation Plan. Under that plan and the SKR HCP a reserve of 13, 158 acres
owned by the RCHCA, MWD, and other public agencies will be managed in perpetuity for
the benefit of multiple species and habitats within the plan area.
1.7.3 LAKE MATHEWS MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN/NATURAL COMMUNITIES CONSERVATION PLAN
In partnership with the MWD, the RCHCA is participating in the
implementation of the Lake Mathews Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural
Community Conservation Plan. Under that plan a reserve of 11,243 acres owned by the
RCHCA, MWD, and other public agencies will be managed in perpetuity for the benefit of
multiple species and habitats within the plan area.
5
1.8 DEPARTURE FROM SPECIES BY SPECIES PLANNING APPROACH
Development of the SKR HCP, which required six years to complete and featured
significant controversy, has provided all parties with valuable experience which can be
applied to make a western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
("MSHCP") a successful conservation effort. Among the lessons learned during the SKR
HCP process was that pursuing habitat conservation planning on a species by species
basis is costly and inefficient. All parties assume that the development of a successful
MSHCP should be a less expensive and more effective method of complying with the
species impact mitigation requirements of FESA, CESA, the National Environmental Policy
Act ("NEPA") and the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") than a project-by-
project approach. The parties also agree that a successful MSHCP can be better for both
habitat conservation and economic development than a project-by-project approach.
1.9 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNING AGREEMENT
The RCHCA has invited local, state and federal agencies as well as interested stake
holders, specific interest groups, and the public at large to participate in the process of
developing a Planning Agreement which will set forth the principles upon which a MSHCP
will be developed. The following agencies, organizations, and groups have been active
participants in discussions leading to the development of this Planning Agreement: United
States Fish and Wildlife Service; United States Bureau of Land Management; United States
Forest Service (Cleveland National Forest); United States Forest Service (San Bernardino
National Forest); Califomia Department of Fish and Game; California Department of Parks
and Recreation; Building Industry Association; Endangered Habitats League; Riverside
County Farm Bureau; Sierra Club; Spirit of the Sage Council; Riverside County Property
6
Owners' Association; Metropolitan Water District; Southern California Edison; Save Our
Forests and Ranch Lands; March Joint Powers Authority; Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District; Eastem Municipal Water District; Riverside County Waste
Resources. Management District; and the San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society. The
RCHCA and the foregoing participants have been involved in the development of this
document.
2. PURPOSES OF THE MSHCP PLANNING AGREEMENT
The purposes of this Planning Agreement are to:
2.1 Establish a cooperative process among the County, federal and state
resource agencies, and affected stakeholders for the development of a
successful MSHCP for western Riverside County;
2.2 Define the basic intentions, principles, and processes to be utilized by the
parties and participants during the preparation of the MSHCP;
2.3 Define roles, responsibilities, standards, schedules, and necessary elements
of the MSHCP;
2.4 Affirm the intention of the parties to educate the public in the habitat
conservation process in the development of the MSHCP;
2.5 Assure public notice of and participation in the development and
implementation of the MSHCP;
2.6 Establish basic funding principles for the MSHCP based upon an equitable
apportionment among local, state, and federal participants.
7
3. GOALS AND PRINCIPLES OF THE MSHCP
The parties agree that the westem Riverside County MSHCP will be guided by the following
goals and principles:
3.1 Prior to commencement of the MSHCP and the development of both
conservation measures and assurances to land owners and users., there
must be general agreement regarding the scope, cost, sources of funding,
time required for completion, and other important principles concerning the
plan;
3.2 In comparison to the option of mitigating for species and habitat impacts on
a project-by-project basis, the MSHCP must be more equitable and efficient,
and less expensive and less time consuming;
3.3 The MSHCP must produce more biologically effective habitat and species
conservation than the project-by-project alternative;
3.4. The MSHCP must be a comprehensive plan which:
3.4.1 Promotes the biological viability and recovery of western Riverside
County ecosystems and habitats, and species dependent thereupon,
toward a goal of reducing the need to list additional species in the
future;
3.4.2 Provides a comprehensive means to coordinate, standardize,
streamline, and ensure closure regarding mitigation requirements of
FESA, CESA, NEPA, CEQA, the California Native Plant Protection
Act, ("CNPPA") and other applicable laws and regulations relating to
biological and natural resources within the plan area.
3.5
3.4.3
3.4.4
3.4.5
3.4.6
3.4.7
3.4.8
Assures property owners, local governments, and other affected
parties that conservation measures undertaken for species and
wildlife habitat adequately covered by the MSHCP will satisfy
mitigation requirements of FESA, CESA, NEPA, CEQA, and CNPPA
concerning impacts to those covered species and habitats;
Establishes and emphasizes the use of incentives to encourage
property owners to voluntarily conserve habitat and species within the
plan area as an alternative to regulatory mandates;
Facilitates economic growth and prosperity so that it occurs in a
manner which is consistent with the conservation of biological
resources within the plan area;
Provides the basis for issuance of incidental take permits and
management authorizations for listed species adequately covered by
the MSHCP by the Service and the Department, respectively;
Provides a process for issuance of incidental take permits and
management authorizations for additional species within the plan area
which are adequately covered by the MSHCP and may be listed in the
future;
Establishes consistent mitigation standards for MSHCP covered
species for potential application by the Service under Section 7 of
FESA.
Expenses for the preparation and implementation of the MSHCP must be
equitably distributed not only among local, state, and federal participants, but
9
in addition, the local share must be distributed among both new development
and general contribution. Federal and state contributions shall be made as
provided in the implementation agreements for the MSHCP;
3.6 The MSHCP deve!opment and approval process must be expedited and
completed within a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the
complexity of the issues involved. All parties agree to use their best efforts
to ensure that the MSHCP and its environmental documents are completed
and approved, if all legal requirements are met, within two years following the
identification of species and habitats to be covered by the plan;
3.7 The recovery of species presently listed as Threatened or Endangered under
CESA and/or FESA which are found within the plan area will be promoted
through MSHCP conservation actions, taking into account factors relating to
the range of each species;
3.8 Decisions by all parties must be made in timely fashion and in compliance
with agreed upon time parameters;
3.9 In order to obtain public support for the conservation and economic benefits
which the parties and participants seek from the MSHCP, public input and
participation must be actively encouraged.
4. TERM OF MSHCP, PERMITS AND MANAGEMENT AUTHORIZATION
The MSHCP, including the conservation, protection, management, and recovery measures
provided for thereunder, and any incidental take permits and management authorizations
resulting therefrom, will have an effective period of no less than 75 years. While the overall
conservation benefit of the MSHCP and the conservation and management of lands set
10
aside under the MSHCP shall be perpetual, other conservation measures of varying
durations, if appropriate, may be customized under the MSHCP.
5. GEOGRAPHIC AREA COVERED BY THE MSHCP
The area covered by the MSHCP shall be all of those portions of Riverside County,
California located:
5.1 Between the northern and southern boundaries of Riverside County west of
the crest of the Peninsular and San Bernardino mountain ranges, generally
to coincide with the westerly boundary of the Coachella Valley multiple
species habitat conservation planning effort as may be agreed upon by the
County and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and;
5.2 Within local political jurisdictions which choose to participate in its
development and implementation.
6. SPECIES AND HABITATS COVERED BY THE MSHCP
6.1 ALL SPECIES AND HABITATS
The intention of the parties is to develop and implement a MSHCP for western
Riverside County which will:
6.1.1 Provide for the effective conservation, protection, management, and
promote the recovery of, habitats and plant and animal species
located within the boundaries of the plan area, whether currently listed
or unlisted, in accordance with the provisions of FESA, CESA, the
NCCP Act, and other applicable laws, taking into consideration
appropriate economic and political constraints as permitted by those
laws;
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.1.5
Focus upon the conservation, protection, management, and recovery
of habitats as the means of ensuring that the MSHCP and any
incidental takings which occur as a result of permits and management
authorizations issued pursuant thereto, shall not appreciably reduce
the likelihood of the survival and recovery in the wild of species
covered by the MSHCP;
Establish a process for making additions to the list of covered species,
i.e., those species for which the MSHCP provides an adequate basis
for issuance of incidental take authorizations under FESA, CESA, and
the NCCP Act. In evaluating the conservation measures needed to
add an uncovered species to the covered species list, the USFWS
and CDFG will first consider the conservation of species provided by
the MSHCP, and if additional measures are needed, those agencies
will work with the County to expeditiously identify the most cost-
effective method to implement the measures needed to add the
species to the covered species list;
Establish a process for achieving compliance with NEPA and CEQA
when new species or habitats are added to the list of those covered
and conserved by the MSHCP;
Define procedures for issuance of incidental take permits,
management authorizations, and/or pre-listing agreements, as
required or allowed by FESA, CESA, and the NCCP Act when
additional species are to be covered by the MSHCP.
12
6.2 INITIAL FOCUS
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties understand and agree that, as more
particularly set forth in Exhibit A hereof, the initial focus of the MSHCP planning process
will be the identification of species and habitats to be initially covered by the MSHCP, and
a determination by the Service and the Department of the likely requirements necessary
to provide for the conservation, protection, and management of those species and habitats
and promotion of their recovery.
7. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MSHCP
7.1 COUNTY
The County and, where appropriate or required, the Cities will:
7.1.1 Facilitate the preparation of the MSHCP through a participatory
process which will ensure ample opportunity for public comment in
compliance with all applicable laws including, without limitation, the
Brown Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act;
7.1.2 Expand the membership of its Advisory Committee as appropriate to
include a balance of all responsible entities and individuals in the
MSHCP area who have a stake in the eventual effects of the plan,
consistent with membership criteria to be developed by the Advisory
Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors;
7.1.3 Provide adequate meeting times and facilities for activities of the
Advisory Committee which are necessary to prepare the MSHCP;
7.1.4 Prepare the MSHCP based upon consideration of the
recommendations of the Advisory Committee;
13
7.1.5
7.1.6
7.1.7
7.1.8
7.1.9
Appoint an independent Scientific Advisory Committee ("SAC") whose
membership will include qualified biologists and conservation experts.
The role of the SAC shall be to assist in the MSHCP planning process,
to provide recommendations based upon the best scientific
information available to the Advisory Committee and the County
conceming scientific aspects of the MSHCP, and to identify additional
data and information which should be gathered in the future in order
to assure effective implementation of adaptive management and
conservation measures throughout the term of the MSHCP;
Serve as lead agency for purposes of CEQA and coordinate the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") with the
Service, which shall act as lead agency for preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") pursuant to the provisions of
NEPA;
Apply for permits and authorizations to allow the take of covered
species in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations;.
Draft and circulate the Draft MSHCP Implementation Agreement in
coordination with the Service and the Department prior to the final
approval of the MSHCP;
As more particularly set forth in Section 10.13 herein, establish a
voluntary early review and coordination process among the Service,
the Department and project proponents with the in jurisdictions of the
County and the Cities.
14
7.2 FEDERAL AND STATE LAND MANAGERS
Participating federal and state land managers will:
7.2.1 Coordinate their own existing and anticipated conservation planning
efforts with the MSHCP, consistent with the laws and regulations
governing those agencies;
7.2.2 Actively advise and assist the Advisory Committee;
7.2.3 Provide such data, information, and documents in their possession or
available to them, and provide such services as they shall determine
appropriate and advisable;
7.2.4 Assist in the development of conservation, protection, management,
and recovery measures to be included within the MSHCP in order to
ensure its effectiveness;
7.2.5 Participate as cooperating agencies in the preparation of the joint
EIS/EIR for the MSHCP.
7.3 SERVICE AND DEPARTMENT
The Service and the Department will:
7.3.1 Provide in-kind support to the County necessary to prepare the
MSHCP which shall include, but not be limited to, compilation and
evaluation of existing biological data, collection of new biological data,
Geographic Information System ("GIS") services, and coordination
with the SAC and the Advisory Committee;
7.3.2 Provide such data, information, and documents in their possession or
available to them, and provide such services as they shall determine
15
appropriate and advisable, to assist in the development of
conservation, protection, management, and recovery measures to be
included within the MSHCP in order to ensure its effectiveness;
7.3.3 In timely fashion, review and submit specific re-wording
recommendations and comments upon all work products prepared
and submitted by the County during the MSHCP process;
7.3.4 Actively advise and assist the Advisory Committee;
7.3.5 Cooperate in obtaining federal and state financial grants and
budgetary appropriations to provide funds to assist in financing the
preparation of the MSHCP;
7.3.6 The Service will act as lead agency for purposes of NEPA and will
coordinate the preparation of an EIS with the County, which will act as
lead agency for preparation of an EIR pursuant to the provisions of
CEQA;
7.3.7 Implementation of federal and state commitments in this Planning
Agreement will be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.
7.4 MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Members of the Advisory Committee will:
7.4.1 Actively and consistently attend meetings concerning development of
the MSHCP;
7.4.2 Seek not only to identify issues and problems, but also to present
proposed solutions to those issues and problems consistent with
16
applicable law and realistic and feasible financial and political
constraints;
7.4.3 Be willing to listen and compromise on individual issues with the
purpose of developing a MSHCP which meets the overall goals as
stated herein.
8. TIMETABLE FOR PREPARATION OF THE MSHCP
All feasible efforts will be undertaken by the Parties to ensure that the MSHCP is completed
by the County and approved, if all legal requirements are met, by the Service and the
Department as expeditiously as possible. With the recognition that the ultimate schedule
for completion of the plan cannot be determined in advance, a target date of two years will
be used. All Parties agree to work cooperatively to develop a proposed timetable for
MSHCP preparation and approval activities during the first six months following the
execution of this Planning Agreement.
9. BIOLOGICAL DATA STANDARDS FOR THE MSHCP
9.1 USE OF BEST INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE
The parties agree that the MSHCP will be prepared based on the best currently
available scientific and commercial information. Measures to fill data gaps and collect
additional scientific data will be included in the implementation measures contained within
the MSHCP.
9.2 AMOUNT, TYPE AND METHOD OF BIOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION
Standards for the amount, type, and method of collection of biological data
necessary for inclusion in the implementation program for the MSHCP will be identified and
agreed upon by the Service, the Department, and the County as part of the MSHCP.
17
10. BASIC PLANNING CONCEPTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MSHCP
Based upon previous habitat conservation planning experiences, revenue limitations, and
sentiments expressed by western Riverside County citizens and property owners, the
parties agree that the following planning concepts will be incorporated into the MSHCP:
10.1 ECOSYSTEMS AND HABITATS
The MSHCP will employ a strategy focusing on conservation of ecosystems and
habitats as the means of ensuring the conservation of species in the plan area.
10.2 CORE RESERVES AND VIABLE HABITAT LINKAGES
The MSHCP will, through its processes, establish Core Reserves located throughout
the Plan Area, as well as Viable Habitat Linkages between the Core Reserves and between
the Core Reserves and adjacent wildlands, where such Viable Habitat Linkages are
necessary and feasible.
10.3 IDENTIFICATION PROCESS FOR CORE RESERVES AND VIABLE
HABITAT LINKAGES
The identification, establishment, and potential expansion of Core Reserves and
Viable Habitat Linkages for the MSHCP will occur through a process described in Exhibit
A of this Planning Agreement.
10.4 LIMITATIONS ON THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
The MSHCP will not incorporate Study Areas, development moratoria, or any other
means of regulating private property for habitat or species protection purposes beyond that
required by law.
18
10.5 USE OF INCENTIVES TO ENCOURAGE VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION
OF HABITAT AND SPECIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES
Consistent with the provisions of FESA and CESA, the MSHCP will rely to the
maximum extent practicable on the use of voluntary incentive based programs in order to
encourage private property owners to conserve habitats and species on their lands.
10.6 BUFFERS
MSHCP Core Reserves and Viable Habitat Linkages will be designed to include core
habitat and buffer areas within their boundaries. Such boundaries will be designed in a
fashion which ensures that reserves and linkages include habitat necessary to mitigate for
edge effect impacts.
10.7 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS FROM WILLING SELLERS ONLY
Any private property whose acquisition is necessary for the MSHCP will be
purchased only from willing sellers.
10.8 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER USES
The Core Reserve and Viable Habitat Linkage system established by the MSHCP
may integrate wildlife habitat areas, parks, trails, and open space located in participating
jurisdictions, as appropriate.
10.9 AGRICULTURAL USES
The MSHCP will be developed to automatically extend incidental take permits to
ongoing agricultural operations, subject to the requirements of law and on such terms and
conditions as may be agreed upon by the Service, the Department, the County, and the
Cities. Take of species covered by the MSHCP resulting from bona fide agricultural
operations will be mitigated through measures set forth in the plan. Conversion of new
19
lands into agricultural uses should be mitigated through the plan in a fair, equitable, and
economically viable manner, subject to the requirements of law and
on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the Service, the Department, the
County, and the Cities.
10.10 STANDARDIZED COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES
Implementation of the MSHCP will be simple and efficient, and will employ
standardized compliance procedures.
10.11 PUBLIC ACCESS
Public access to MSHCP Core Reserves and Viable Habitat Linkages will be
permitted for activities compatible with conservation values and goals set forth in the
MSHCP and which are acceptable to the agency or entity having jurisdiction over such
Core Reserves or Viable Habitat Linkages.
10.12 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
The MSHCP will ensure that operation and maintenance of existing infrastructure
improvements within the plan area (including, but not limited to, public roads and rights-of-
way, flood control facilities, landfills, gas, electric and other public utility facilities providing
services essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public), as well as planned
infrastructure improvements as identified in adopted master plans of participating agencies
and existing on the date of this Agreement, will not require any further mitigation for
impacts to covered species beyond that provided by implementation of the MSHCP, or as
provided in existing interagency agreements. Similar provisions will be made in the
MSHCP to permit responsible agencies to respond to emergency situations within the plan
area without requirements to perform biological surveys prior to taking action.
20
10.13 VOLUNTARY PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS
In order to permit property owners, local jurisdictions, and regulatory agencies to
identify the effects of interim projects (i.e., those projects occurring prior to MSHCP
approval) which might preclude important conservation planning options, a voluntary,
cooperative process, integrated into the eady stages of project review, will be cooperatively
developed and instituted by the County, the Cities, the Service and the Department.
11. COMPONENTS OF THE MSHCP
In addition to such other elements as required by law or as the Parties shall determine, the
MSHCP shall include the following components:
11.1 Identification of any and all existing conserved areas and Viable Habitat
Linkages;
11.2 Standards and criteria for new and expanded Core Reserves and Viable
Habitat Linkages;
11.3 Adaptive management principles which among other items, provide for a
review of the status of habitat and species throughout the plan area on an
ongoing basis;
11.4 Measurable criteria for assessing biological objectives for each covered
species and habitat;
11.5 Measurable criteda for assessing progress toward Core Reserve and Viable
Habitat Linkages assembly;
11.6 Incidental take provisions based upon such assurances by local participating
jurisdictions as may be required by law, that the obligations undertaken by
them with respect to the conservation, protection, management, and recovery
measures set forth in the MSHCP will be accomplished;
11.7 Implementation measures to be accomplished after adoption of the MSHCP
which will include:
11.7.1 Acquisition of additional Core Reserves, additions to Core
Reserves and Viable Habitat Linkages as may be necessary
and feasible;
11.7.2 Refinement of adaptive management principles;
11.7.3 Habitat and species monitoring procedures;
11.7.4 Collection of additional data necessary for the MSHCP.
12. FUNDING PRINCIPLES NECESSARY TO ASSURE MSHCP DEVELOPMENT
AND IMPLEMENTATION
12.1 EQUITABLE APPORTIONMENT
Funding for development and implementation of the MSHCP will be equitably
apportioned among federal, state, and local sources. The local share of MSHCP financing
will be equitably shared by new development and general public contribution after taking
into consideration mitigation which may be required of new developments pursuant to
requirements of CEQA and other applicable laws.
12.2 STATE AND FEDERAL SHARES
Consistent with commitments made to other MSHCP planning efforts occurring in
southem California, federal and state agencies will use their best efforts to secure non-local
funding for lands which must be acquired under the MSHCP, and will assume financial
responsibility for biological management and monitoring of lands under their control which
are incorporated into the MSHCP Core Reserve and Viable Habitat Linkage System.
Commitments for local, state, and federal financial contributions to the MSHCP will be
22
defined in the plan and its implementing agreements with the Service and the Department
prior to their approval by the County.
12.3 ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT
The Parties agree that the ability to acquire and manage the Core Reserve and
Viable Habitat Linkage system included in the MSHCP will be dependent upon local, state,
and federal funding, as well as the successful implementation of voluntary incentive
programs for property owners and other creative and innovative conservation programs
established by the MSHCP.
12.4 ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
The County will actively seek funding from federal, state, local, and private sources
to assist in the development and implementation of the MSHCP.
12.5 NON-WASTING ENDOWMENT
Among other financial arrangements investigated by the County to provide the
assurances required by law for the MSHCP, it will consider the establishment of non-
wasting endowments, in present day values, that provide funding necessary to implement,
manage and monitor the measures set forth in the plan.
13. ASSURANCES
13.1 NO SURPRISES
It is the intention of the Parties that the MSHCP implementing agreements with the
Service and the Department will include all assurances contained in the "No Surprises"
regulation as it appears in 50 CFR Part 17 and 50 CFR Part 222 as well as in the
November 1996 Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook published by the Service.
23
13.2 NO ADDITIONAL MITIGATION
As long as the terms of an approved MSHCP are being fully implemented, the
Service and the Department agree that they will not seek additional mitigation involving
additional land or funds for impacts to covered species under the FESA, CESA, NEPA,
CEQA, CNPPA, or in any other regulatory or permitting process.
13.3 ASSURANCES IN DOCUMENTS
In order to ensure that MSHCP assurances are formal, reliable, and legally binding,
such provisions will be included in MSHCP implementation agreements.
13.4 RECOVERY PLANS
The Service will develop Recovery Plans for all listed species covered by the
MSHCP, where appropriate, and agrees to involve the County in the development of such
plans to the maximum extent permitted by law.
13.5 SPECIES PROPOSED FOR LISTING
If any species covered by the MSHCP are proposed for listing under the FESA or
CESA during the preparation or after the approval of the MSHCP, the Service and the
Department will, at the earliest possible date, and in addition to such notices as may be
required by law, specifically notify the County and the Cities of the pendency of the
proposed listing. During their deliberations concerning proposed listings the Service and
the Department will evaluate the MSHCP to determine the extent to which its conservation
actions can assure species persistence and therefore reduce or eliminate the legal
requirement that the species be listed.
13.6 NO SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION
The MSHCP implementation agreement will provide that failure of federal and/or
State agencies to fulfill their obligations thereunder will not result in additional costs to
24
permittees, but may require reevaluation of other permit parameters and assurances. The
Parties agree that they shall jointly and cooperatively pursue such reevaluation prior to the
commencement of any action to suspend or revoke any such permit or management
authorization. Furthermore, it is the intention of the Parties that the MSHCP and its
implementation agreements will be developed to provide that the failure of federal and/or
State agencies to fulfill their obligations thereunder, in itself, will not result in the revocation
of incidental and management take permits or agreements. However, in the event that
suspension or revocation is intended as a result of the failure of any State or federal
agency to fulfill its commitment to implement the MSHCP, contemporaneously with any
notice of intention to commence the process to suspend or revoke any such permit or
management authorization, the Regional Director of the Service, the Director of the
Department of Fish and Game, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the
County, shall, by joint letter, notify each Party as well as the State and federal legislators
representing the plan area or any part of it, of the intended suspension or revocation and
that such suspension or revocation is being caused by the absence of appropriate
resources being made available to the relevant State and/or federal agencies to allow them
to fulfill their obligations to the MSHCP.
14. MSHCP ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
14.1 CEQA AND NEPA
The Parties will cooperate and seek the cooperation of the U.S. Forest Service, the
BLM, and appropriate state agencies in the preparation and processing of all MSHCP
environmental documents pursuant to requirements of NEPA and CEQA. Joint
NEPNCEQA documents will be prepared whenever practical.
25
15. AMENDMENTS TO MSHCP PLANNING AGREEMENT
The MSHCP Planning Agreement may be amended at any time subject to written
concurrence by all parties.
///
///
///
26
THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED ON THE DAY SET BY EACH SIGNATURE
ATTACHED HERETO AND SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON THE DAY AND YEAR
FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.
DATE: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
INTERIOR
BY:
DATE: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE
BY:
DATE: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT
BY:
DATE:
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY
BY:
DATE:
ATTEST
Deputy
SEP I 5 1998
DATE:
DATE:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME
BY:
CITY OF CORONA
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF HEMET
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF PERRIS
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:
DATE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
28
EXHIBIT A
PROCESS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CORE RESERVES
AND VIABLE HABITAT LINKAGES FOR THE MSHCP
Core Reserves and Viable Habitat Linkages for the MSHCP will be identified and
established through a multi-step process. The first step will involve the following tasks to
be undertaken over a six month pedod following the execution of this Planning Agreement:
With the assistance of the Service, the Department, and the SAC, the
Advisory Committee will identify the species and habitats to be addressed by
the MSHCP;
With the assistance of the SAC, the Service and the Department will conduct
a preliminary evaluation of the habitat needs of the species proposed to be
included in the MSHCP, including a rough estimate of the number, general
location, and size of such additional Core Reserves and Viable Habitat
Linkages which may be necessary to obtain approval for a MSHCP covering
the species identified by the Advisory Committee;
Evaluation of the habitat needs of the species proposed to be included in the
plan will begin with an analysis of the contribution of federal, state and local
public lands to this MSHCP, including, but not limited to, those reserves
established pursuant to the SKR HCP and such additional public lands
presently dedicated to or available for habitat conservation, consistent with
the applicable rules, regulations and guidelines governing the administration
of such lands, recognizing that neither the County nor the Cities may assert
jurisdiction over State and federal lands;
Subject to the provisions of Section 9 of this Planning Agreement, the
Service, the Department and the SAC also will recommend the amount, type
and method of collection of biological data necessary to support the
development of a defensible MSHCP.
Following the completion of the above tasks, the County and the Cities will consider the
information and recommendations resulting therefrom in making their decisions concerning
whether to proceed with the preparation of a MSHCP. These decisions will be based upon
such factors as the County and the Cities consider relevant.
If the County and the Cities opt to proceed, the MSHCP will include criteria and standards
under which the Core Reserve and Viable Habitat Linkage system defined in the plan will
be expanded over time. Such expansion will be undertaken in a manner consistent with
available finances and will utilize, to the maximum extent practicable, voluntary agreements
with landowners, conservation incentive programs, approved mitigation banks, and
planning tools such as density bonus and transfer programs and project design clustering.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the MSHCP is intended to compliment and assist
compliance with, and not as a substitute for, mandatory planning requirements of California
Government Code Sections 65302(d) and 65561 concerning habitat species and natural
resource protection.
DATE:
CITY OF HEMET
BY'
DATE:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY'
DATE:
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY'
DATE:'
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY'
DATE:
CITY OF PERRIS
BY'
DATE:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY'
DATE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY'
28
ITEM 16
ORAL REPORT