Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout101690 CC AgendaCALL TO ORDER: Invocation Flag Salute ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS A GENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER OCTOBER 16, 1990- 7:00 PM Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 90-20 Resolution: No. 90-104 Pastor Tim Riter Rancho Christian Church Councilmember Lindemans Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks Proclamation - National Business Women's Week A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. 2legendall 01890 I 10/11 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 - Rancho California Partners Northeast corner of Avenida Alvarado and Aqua Vista Way. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file. 3 Plot Plan No. 11622 - SI;>ectrum Contracting 27800 Block of Diaz Road RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file. 4 Plot Plan No. 11759 - Ability Cabinets North of Enterprise Circle South, south of Winchester Road. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file. 2lagends/1018~O 2 1011 1/~O 5 6 7 8 Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 - Paine 30565 Estero Street, East of Ormsby Road. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file. Variance No. 2 - Palm Plaza Signs The southwesterly corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road adjacent to Iol 5. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Receive and file. Plot Plan No. 41 - Rosies Cantina 28636 Front Street, Suite 109, the northeast corner of Front Street and Main Street. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Receive and file. Plot Plan No. 11688. Tentative Parcel MaD No. 25632 - Centerpoint Industrial P~rk Southwest side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Receive and file. 9 Aqency Agreement/California Endan~Jered Species Permit RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve amended agreement and authorize Mayor to execute. 21agenda/1018eO 3 1011 1/'80 COUNCIL BUSINESS 10 Personnel Policies and Procedures RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL RULES AND POLICIES 11 Overweight Vehicle Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.06 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING VEHICLE WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC STREETS 12 Public Forum Meeting Discussion RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Receive direction from Council on appropriate week of the month to hold Public Forum Meeting. 2/agjnda/1o1680 4 1011 1/90 13 14 Calle Medusa Traffic Study - Presentation by City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Review of document not complete, therefore it will be sent under separate cover. Measure "A" Funds Discussion RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Discussion requested by Mayor Ronald J. Parks. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: October 30, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 2881 6 Pujol Street, Temecula, California 2/~gend~/lOle80 6 101111~0 Proclamation The City of Ternecula NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK WHEREAS, the National Federation of Business and Professional women began National Business Women's Week in 1926 to "dramatize women's contributions to the economic social and political life of the community, state, nation, and wo~d; and WHEREAS, for 64 years, special activities have been sponsored by the Federation and its local organizations to honor working women; and WHEREAS, over the years, National Business Women's Week has become an event widely recognized by public and private institutions and local communities; and WHEREAS, major goals of business and professional women are to help create better conditions for business women through the study of social, educational, economic and political problems; to help them be of greater service to their community, to further friendship with women throughout the wo~d; and WHEREAS, the California Federation of BPW, along with the entire National Federation, will celebrate National Business Women's Week October 21 - 27, 1990; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald J. Parks, Mayor of the City of Temecula, hereby join my colleagues across the nation in proclaiming October 21 - 27, 1990 as NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK IN TEMECULA NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that I recognize and commend the many vital contributions women make to America's workforce, and encourage their participation in all fields of employment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 15th day of October, 1990. Ronald J. Parks Mayor David F. Dixon City Clerk ITEM NO. 1 ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager P)anning Department October 16, 1990 Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 PREPARED BY: Oliver Mujica RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Rancho California Partners REPRESENTATIVE: J. R. Miller and Associates, Inc. PROPOSAL: Construct two industrial buildings side by side for a total of 23,700 square feet on two existing parcels which together comprise 1.19 acres. LOCAT ION: Northeast corner of Avenida Alvaratio and Aqua Vista Way. EXISTING ZONING: MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is comprised of two separate buildings on two separate parcels. Together the buildings comprise 23,700 square feet of floor area on 1.19 acres. Each building could be constructed independent of the other, although they will likely be constructed simultaneously. STAFFRPT\5&6.A 1 ~ACKGROUND: On /~ugust 20, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's proposal; and, continued this time due to the following concerns: Reconfigure the location of the trash enclosure and the truck loading doors to that they do not face the street. 2. Provide sufficient landscaping. 3. Provide proper screening of roof equipment· On September 17, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's modified proposal and approved Plot Plan No. 5 and 6 by a vote of 5-0. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: RECEIVE AND FILE Resolution No. 90- , approvin9 Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6, subject to the Conditions of Approval. OM: ks Attachments: 2. 3. Exhibits Resolution Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Staff Reports (Dated August 20, 1990 and September 17, 1990) Planning Commission Minutes (Dated August 20, 1990 and September 17, 1990) STAFFRPT\5&6. A 2 NV'Id 3J, IS ..... ) ~ T z ,, Q ~,"" · [ ..... FLOOR PLAN 0 ,,, .4 (.) Z ..I Z NOI,L'VAg't'9 I:IOII:i::I..LX3 ...... ) ~ ~1~ ,,,t O 14J 8NOIIC)::IS 880EIO 9Nl(]-Ilrle ...... ) ~ lu 0 © :' j RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NOS. 5 AND 6 TO CONSTRUCT TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA ALVARADO AND AQUA VISTA WAY. WHEREAS, Rancho California Partners filed Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plans on September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot Plans; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. makes the following findings: That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. ~2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\5&6. A 1 There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Ran, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plans are consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. Ic) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: ( 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the Ceneral Plan STAFFRPT\5&6.A 2 requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. 12) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plans proposed conform to the logical development of its proposed site, and are compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. project will Declaration, An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 to construct two industrial buildings located on the northeast corner of Avenida Alvaratio and Aqua Vista Way subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of September, 1990 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFR PT\5&6. A 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6. DATED: By Name Title STAFFRPT\S&6. A 4 CITY Of TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 Plannin9 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the Planning Commission approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginnin9 of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval· The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6, or as amended by these conditions. I n the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 ) year or more, this approval shall become null and void· Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way, and shall comply with Ordinance No. 655. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation and shadin9 plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Plantin9 within ten 110) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to 9row higher than thirty (30) inches. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit seven 17 ) copies of parkin9, landscapin9, shadin9 and irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filin9 fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348. A minimum of 47 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3) inches on four I~) inches of Class II base. A minimum of 2 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking space reserved for he handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior STAFF R PT\5&6. A 1 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. end of the parking space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one { 1 ) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least three {3) square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Engineering Department Environmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees along the streets and within the parking areas. This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Temecula Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended structure or building is safe and structurally integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and 9eotechnical conditions· Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance no. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new STA FFR PT\5&6. A 2 buildin9 and parking structure. Fire Department With respect to the Conditions of Approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the followin9 fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: 15. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings usin9 the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 16. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of deliverin9 3,000 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 17. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system 16"x~"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrantl s) in the system. 18. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 19. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1,500 CPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building( s) . A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 20. Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as required by the Uniform Building Code. 21. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section 505{e) of the Uniform Building Code. 22. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must appear on the title page of the buildin9 plans. STAFF R PT\5 &6. A 3 23. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 25. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum ratin9 of 2A-10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 26. Prior to issuance of buildin9 permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee. 28. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering Staff. Health Department The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 6 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. Prior to building plan submittal, the following items will be requested: 29. 'tWill-serve" letters from the water and sewering agencies. 30. if there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch I Jon Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: a. Underground storage tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185). d. Waste reduction management. Enqineerinq Department PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT: 31. The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of plans. STAFFRPT\5&6. A 4 32. 33. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. The developer shall submit four (q.) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. The developer shall submit four I~) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70. The plan shall be drawn on 2~"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 35. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 36. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 37. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 38. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. 39. The project is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 4O. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already cr_-,dited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. STAFFRPT\5&6.A 5 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, includin9 that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. STAFFRPT\5&6.A 6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 17, 1990 Case No.: Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 Prepared By: Oilvet Mujica Recommendation: 1. Approve Negative Declaration 2. Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT ION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: Rancho California Partners J. R. Miller and Associates, Inc. Construct two industrial buildings side by side for a total of 23,700 square feet on two existing parcels which together comprise 1.19 acres. Northeast corner of Avenida Alvarado and Aqua Vista Way. MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial North: South: East: West: MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturin9 Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial Manufacturing on all sides. No. of Buildings: No. of Acres: No. of Parcels: Total Square Feet: No. of Parking Spaces: Building Height: 2 1.19 2 23,700 sq.ft. 47 spaces 33 feet STAFFRPT\S&6. A 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BACKGROUND: ANALYSIS: The project is comprised of two separate buildings on two separate parcels. Together the buildings comprise 23,700 square feet of floor area on 1.19 acres. Each building could be constructed independent of the other, although they will likely be constructed simultaneously. On August 20, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's proposal; and, continued this item due to those concerns identified below in the Staff Analysis. Subsequent to the Commission meeting, Staff met with the applicant to discuss possible design modifications in order to address the Commission's concerns. On September 7, 1990, the applicant submitted a modified proposal for the Commission's consideration. In response to the comments expressed by the Commission, the applicant modified the improvement plans, as described below: Reconfiqure the location of the trash enclosure and the truck Ioadinq doors so that they do not face the street. The applicant relocated the trash enclosure doors to the north elevation (facing the alley) and provided a landscaped planter in order to screen the enclosure· The applicant also modified both the northwest and northeast corners of the building, by eliminating the recess, in order to relocate the loading doors to the north elevation, thus, eliminating the direct visibility of the doors, especially from Aqua Vista Way. 2. Provide sufficient landscapinq. According to the Zoning Code [ Section 11.4), a minimum of 10 percent of the site shall be landscaped and a minimum 10 foot strip adjacent to street right-of-way shall be provided. Said landscaping shall not include landscaping located within the street right- of-way. STAFFRPT\5&6. A 2 GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: E NV I R ONMENTA L DETERMINATION: The applicant has modified the site plan in order to fulfill the minimum landscaping requirement by providing 10.4 percent ( 5,215 square feet) landscaping. However, the applicant is requesting relief from the ten (10') foot minimum landscaped strip, adjacent to the street right-of-way. The applicant has indicated the following: the purpose of this request is due to the minimum radii, for vehicular access, required by the Fire Department; a total site plan redesign would be required in order to comply with both requirements; and, there are existing developments within the surrounding area that do not provide a 10 foot landscaped strip. Staff would suggest that the Planning Commission should closely consider this request since it may set a precedence with regards to minimum street landscaping. In addition, it should be noted that an existing Condition, that does not provide a 10 foot landscaped strip, approved by the County does not preclude the Commission from requirin9 such landscaping. Provide proper screening of roof equipment. The applicant continued the parapet around the building in order to screen the roof mounted equipment; The proposed project is consistent with the SWAP Land Use Designation of General Light Industrial, which includes distribution warehouses and similar industrial uses. In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project will be consistent with the new General Plan when it is adopted. As indicated in the previous Staff Report, an Initial Study was performed for this project which determined that no significant impact would result to the netural or built environment in the City, and a Negative Declaration has been recommended for adoption. STAFFRPT\5&6. A 3 FINDINGS: 10. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws· The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the expanded initial study performed for this project. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. STAFF R PT\5&6. A ~ 11. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Plannin9 Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot P)an Nos. 5 and 6, and APPROVE Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6; based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. OM: ks Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Conditions of Approval 3. Planning Commission Staff Report (Date August 20, 1990) Large Scale Plans STAFFRPT\5&6. A 5 P'F,ANNTN(I COMM[FrF;ION wa.~ cc GHT the ~lon Id re~ sta' ad t Re: and tni nq ti adia wil th h ~U] r, Dro~e COMM SEPmRMRKR 17, ]990 AY3 t he ,ns t o t Ce ty ans nc~ oot t lye D. 90- ,rov] ti ona rove ona [ 11 t and f con ned ~ the to iod~fj~atl Col tion: No. :ead 1 tj ended reac "; 24 ar Dr SOUr ionar' w]n~ a then app ct the 11 lition 29 and 5 ~MISS lditi a on; 1; and Lhe opert rs n the NOEl 0 3. PLOT PL]tN NOS' 5 AND 6 3.1 Proposal to construct two industrial buildings side by side for a total of 23,700 square feet on two existing parcels which together comprise 1.19 acres. Parcels are located at the northeast corner of Avenida Alvarado and Agua Vista Way. GARY THORNHILL provided the staff report on this item. He stated that the applicant had submitted a earlier ProPOSal: however, staff expressed concerns in the MIN. 9/17/90 -4- 9/21/90 PI.ANNIN~ C()MMIS-,~ION SF.P'FF24F1ER 17. ,1990 JOHN MIODI,EmON stated that. Cond].tion No. 44, relating to the fees for road improvements and DIIb]]C facilities, wout. d be added to the Conditions of ApprovaL, and that the applicant had been advised. ANTHONY POI,O, Markham & Associates, 41750 WInchester Road, Temecula. representative for the aPPlicant, stated their concurrence wi. th the staff report. COMMISSIONER FORD suooested that a Condition be set forth to restrict the mezzanine area to be used a storage only, as DrnDoSed Dv the applicant. ANTHONY POLO stated that the applicant would have no problem with this. COMMISSIONER FORD also suooested that "No Park~nQ" signs be erected at the back of the bui[dina. ANTHONY POLO stated that the fire department had already required red striDDina along the back of the building. COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to c]ose the public hearinQ. seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR and carried unanimously. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, FaheV, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONER FORD moved to recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 and approve Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6~ based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval with the following modifications: Condition No. 44 as submitted by the Engineering Department and Condition No. 45, restricting the use of the mezzanine area for storage only. Seconded MHI.9/l?tgO -5- 9/21/90 i-~F.ANNINr-: (:OM,MI,.%SION I~INIJ'~'RS SRP"PE.MP, K~ '17, ]990 NOF:S: 0 ~a~r. FanPv. Ford, Hoaqland. Ch]n~aeff None MAP 3ghg p 0vide ~he!s' re oft on' is ~t 2 improy merits St~ . The conf ' !, eh/e~t't sa woul ~ b ; ary at ~is til ., the v pro des ac :~e~w ]ina ~ starcu: const an !u]-de- ley his AN~ M~ :ham & , Rc , Te r cla fica on o ~on pu ic f 1 st~ th~ Cond' ~ 29 pert n ld b del '~ ~ ~ I , ad' cen 2 26 Pu' y '. OpPO~ ~0 recomme: ment MIN. 9/17/90 -6- 9/21/90 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION August 20, 1990 Case No.: Plot Plan Nos. 5 and Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: Rancho California Partners J. R. Miller and Associates, Inc. Construct two industrial buildings side by side for a total of 23,700 square feet on two existing parcels which together comprise 1.19 acres. Northeast corner of Avenida AIvarado and Aqua Vista Way. MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial North: South: East: West: MSC - Manufacturin9 Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial MSC - Manufacturing Service Commercial Manufacturing on all sides. No. of Buildings: No. of Acres: No. of Parcels: Total Square Feet: No. of Parking Spaces: Building Height: 2 1.19 2 23,700 sq.ft. 47 spaces 33 feet STAFFRPT\PP5&6 BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Plot Plan 5 and Plot Plan 6 were submitted for the City's consideration on April 13, 1990. The project was reviewed at the Preliminary Development Review Committee meeting on May 17, 1990. A redesign of the project was necessary and the amended site plan was submitted on June 20, 1990. On June 21, 1990, the Staff determined a Negative Declaration should be adopted and the project was duly advertised and available for public review prior to this hearing date. The project is comprised of two separate buildings on two separate parcels. Together the buildings comprise 23,700 square feet of floor area on 1.19 acres. Each building could be constructed independent of the other, although they will likely be constructed simultaneously. Architecture Both buildings are tilt-up concrete structures which are contemporary in appearance. The architecture is similar to other projects in the area and has been deemed compatible with area development. Parkinq Forty-seven ( 47 ) parking spaces surround the project, which meets Ordinance No. 348 parking requirements. Landscape Adequate landscaping is planned for the site. A landscape plan will be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Access Two points of access are planned for the project. Those driveways are reciprocal with adjoining properties to the north and east. The reciprocal access is provided for with the overlying industrial parcel map and has been deemed appropriate by the Engineering Staff. GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: The SWAP land use designation for the site is General Light Industrial. Other manufacturing uses surround the property, Staff considers the proposal an infill project. Probable consistency ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINGS: with the future General Plan appears to be very high. An Initial Study was performed for the project which determined that no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City. That study has been attached to this report for review. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 will be consistent with the City's future Genera) Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws· The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare· The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties· The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic· The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the expanded initial study performed for this project. 10. 11. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6, and 2. APPROVE Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6; based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. 4 PLANNING COMM]SSION..MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990 Ca~sre on · ndit'ons o Approv set f th by · : : 4,_ .& 5. Plot Plan No. 5 and No. 6 Sam Reed presented the staff report on Plot Plan No. 5, the construction of a 11,050 square foot light manufacturing facility on .57 acres and Plot Plan No. 6, the construction of a 12,950 square foot light manufacturing facility on .63 acres. Joe Venttess, J.R. Miller & Associates, 2854 E. Imperial Highway, Brea, gave a brief description of the project. Mr. Venttess stated that the total square footage did not include mezzanines in both buildingsl however, the parking study incorporated this extra square footage. Mr. Venttess indicated an error in the staff report on page 4, under Health Department, and advised the Commission that the Health Department requirements for both plot plans had been reviewed. Commissione[ Chiniaeff asked if the applicant would be o~posed to reconfiguring the location of the trash enclosure and the truck loading doors so that they do not face the street. Conwnissioner Chiniaeff also expressed concern for sufficient landscape and proper screening of roof equipment. Mr. Venttess stated the project has satisfied the landscape rea. uirements and provided for sufficient screening of the roof equipment, but that they could accommodate the Commission's requests. He also stated that there would be no problem turning the door of the trash enclosure away from the street; however, in relocating the truck loading doors, the needs of the tenant would 'have to be considered. axw.s/2o/so -s- s121l~o PL/~NING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990 Commissioner Ford moved to close the public hearing seconded by Commissioner Fahey and carried unanimously. Commissioner Hoagland moved to reject staff's recommendation and not adopt the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6 and deny Plot Plan Nos. 5 and 6, and direct staff to work with the applicant to provide a detailed landscape plan, review the structural design to ensure adequate screening of the roof equipment, study the parking and to re-evaluate the location of the truck loading doors. Con~nissioner Hoaqland amended his motion by continuing the public hearing on Item 4 and Item 5 to the Planning Commission meeting of September 17, 1990. Commissioner Fahey seconded the motion. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ,prov, fail sh Pujoi . ~ty aired t dedi .tion at t] was looi the of remain, at feet Ohmda plied t de re by Ley woul of fee for ,f Pu . da Ent, had agre X tern Mu Water ent thi t feet. wades be gre and ~t s t: sta !sea~ wou be resp ,sible · cessChai an Denn' Chin mini rec %t~d~50 pj~~llo p]ann to more es ts or a 'The eetin 7:55 P ~ 6. ive ' '~e ~ 6 Pa staff repo: on isi of [ Map 1 f s. t when pa ma' waN'. s/20/90 - e- s/23/90 ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department October 16, 1990 Plot Plan No. 11622 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Steve Jiannino Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: P R OPOSA L: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Spectrum Contracting, Inc. Spectrum Contracting, Inc. Construction of five industrial buildings totaling 76,028 square feet on a 5.13 acre project site. 27800 Block of Diaz Road M-SC North: South: East: West: (Manufacturing - Service Commercial) M-SC (Manufacturing, Commercial ) M-SC ( Manufacturing, Commercial ) R -R { Rural Residential ) M-SC (Manufacturing, Commercial ) Service Service Service Vacant North: South: East: West: Industrial Park Center) Vacant Vacant Vacant ( Dos Picos Business STAFFRPT\PP11622 1 DISCUSSION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~t a duly advertised public hearing on October 1, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Plot Plan No. 11622 by a vote of 3-1 with the following changes to the Conditions of Approval: Replace Engineering Conditions as presented at the meeting - replace page 5 of the Conditions of Approval. 2. Delete Condition No. 13. 3. Change Condition No. 36 to read: "Prior to occupancy, construct drive approaches, and install parkway trees and street lights on Diaz Road." The Commission discussed the lack of landscaping areas along the north side of the buildings and the building facing Diaz Road· Staff was directed to work with the applicant to provide adequate landscaping on the north side of the project and along the building frontage facing Diaz Road. Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 11622 based on the findings in the attached Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as amended at the Planning Commission hearing of October 1, 1990. SJ: ks Attachments: Draft Minutes of October 1, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission Staff Report Packet Dated October 1, 1990 STAFFRPT\PP11622 2 DRAFT ~ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER ], I two tenants named and the other signs would have a of four tenants named. th the SSIONER BLAIR Questioned that diagrams p da packages ~nd.~cated eight to ten n s. ided in s] ors on GREG ERI agree to Bedford Properties, ion the signs to that they wou]d four tenants. COMMISSIONER loved to ad Reso]utjon 90-. ........ aDDrovinQ Variance Variance No. 2 based on the attached ODS of Approval and added Condition No. 5 stipula' a maximum of two names on the freeway signs and fou ,n the other signs, seconded by COMMISSIONER nd ca as follows: AYES: COMM]SSIONERS Blair, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff C{ BSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: SSIONER CHIN]AEFF declared a f~ve minute meeting reconvened at 7:50 P.M. .ne Hoag nd rece~~ 5. PLOT PI,AN NO. ] ] 622 5.] Proposal to construct 5 industrial buj]djngs (]2 -36,000 square feet each) at the 27800 block of Diaz Road. STEVE JONANOE provided the staff report on this project. JOHN MIDDLETON advised the Commission that Condition No. 36 and Condition No. 42 had been revised per the memorandum of September 28, ].990. STEVE HENDI.EY, Spectrum Contractjng, Inc., expressed concurrence with staff's recommendations. Be requested c]arificat~on of Condition No. ]3, GARY THORNHILL stated this Condition could be deleted; Condition No. 30, amended MIN. 10/1/90 -S- lO/lO/gO DRAF1 PI.]mJ, iNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER ], ] 990 to read "If required, protection shall be". Mr. Hendley also reque.~ted c]arif.~cation of Condition No. 36. JOHN MIDDI,ETON stated that Condition No. 36 could be amended to read "construct drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on Diaz Road". The Commj ssj on expressed concern for the ] andscape p] an. COMMISSIONF.R CHINIAEFF stated that he would feel comfortable with staff approving the landscape as long as they were aware that the Commission wants well developed specimens and not five gallon trees. COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing, seconded by CfM4MISSIONF.~ BI,AIR. COMM]SSIONER FORD moved to adopt the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 11622 and approve Plot Plan No. ]]622, Request for S~te Approval, subject to the Conditions of Approval with the fo]]ow~na modjf.~cat~ons: Condition No. ]3 deleted; Condition No. 30 modified to read "If required, protect] on"; and Condj tj on No. 36 modj fj ed to read "construct drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on Djaz Road"; and direct staff to work with applicant on landscape plans. Seconded by COMMISSIONER FAH}{Y and carr.~ ed a.~ fo) ]ows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford, Cb.~ ni aeff NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair ABSENT: ] COMMISSIONERS: Hoag]and PLOT PLAN NO. 11609 6..] C.~ rc] e, ] to construct an ]8,725 square ture store on the north of Jefferson Avenue. ] of Enterprise STEVE JONANOE ~ f report on this item. He advised the staff was concerned with the unloadim . He stated that the pro ot designed with .ading doors; however applicant has indicated tJ building will a furniture showroom for d~sp]ay on] that ales and shipping will be from another 1 Wl]{. 10/1/90 -7- 10/10/90 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, 1990 Case No,: Plot Imtilm~-Ne. 11622 Prepared By: Deborah Parks Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Spectrum Contracting, Inc. Spectrum Contracting, Inc. Construction of five industrial buildings totaling 76,028 square feet on a 5.13 acre project site. 27800 Block of Diaz Road M-SC North: M-SC South: M-SC East: R-R West: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) (Manufacturing, Commercial ) (Manufacturing, Commercial ) I Rural Residential) (Manufacturing, Commercial ) Service Service Service Vacant North: Industrial Center) South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant Park I Dos Picos Business BACKGROUND: The application for Plot Plan No. 11622 was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on November 22, 1989. The proposal was reviewed by the Riverside County Land Division Committee on two separate occasions: December 21, 1989 and March 13, 1990. At the March 13, 1990 Land Division Committee meeting, STAFFRPT\PP11622 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: minor revisions to Plot Plan 11622 were requested. On May 10, 1990 the file was transferred to the City of Temecula. The request was reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee on August 16, 1990. The proposed project consists of five industrial buildings, totaling 76,028 square feet. The buildings are proposed to be used for single or double tenants. The smallest tenant would occupy approximately 7,000 square feet. At this time, it is not certain what type of tenants will occupy the buildings. Circulation] Traffic The City's Engineering Department reviewed the Traffic Study which was prepared for the proposed project by the applicant's Traffic Engineer. The City's Engineerin9 Department determined that the proposed development will not generate an excessive number of trips for the designated land use for the parcel. Since the City is currently collectin9 a fee for the Temecula City-wide Road Benefit Fund, additional mitigation will not be necessary. Parkinq/Internal Circulation The proposed project requires 152 parking spaces for unidentified industrial uses. The plot plan proposes 191 spaces. Buildings B-E will be served by 11/2 loading spaces, where Buildin9 A will have one loadin9 space. Access to the site will be provided by two driveways on Diaz Road. The internal site circulation plan provides adequate space to comfortably drive through the project and park. Architectural Compatibility The proposed exterior elevations of all five buildings are consistent in materials and style with surrounding industrial developments. Building B-E are identical with 15,992 square feet each. Building A is smaller with 12,060 square feet and has a different exterior. Building A has a more interesting exterior fronting onto Diaz Road. The materials used will include a combination of sand blasted colored concrete and glass. STAFFRPT\PP11622 2 GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project site is designated LI I General Light Industrial) by the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP). The proposed project is consistent with the general policies of SWAP. It is anticipated that the project as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's forthcoming General Plan. An Initial Study has been completed for the project and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposal· FINDINGS: Site Approval The proposed use will not have a substantial adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thered. The use will not generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic or other disturbances. The site for the proposed use has adequate access. The proposed project will not inhibit or restrict future ability to use active or passive solar energy systems. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in the staff report. There is a probability that the project will not deter, or interfere with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the new General Plan. These findings are supported by staff analysis, minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. The lawful conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare· STAFFR PT\PP11622 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 11622, and APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11621, Request for Site Approval, based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. DP:ks Attachments: 1. Exhibits 2. Conditions Of Approval 3. I nitial Study STAFFR PT\PP11622 ~ >l~Vd IVI~-LSF]QNI NOISIS]~d )~tVd IVI~I.I. SFI(]NI NOISIDt~Jd i )4~Vd 1Vll~lSflQNI NOISI}]~d ] ~ '(3 '3 '8 S~NIOllfl8 z Z tuoo~o4S leN~,snPul · V. DNIOIlR8 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITION5 OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No. 11622 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the Planning Commission approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By this approval within the two {2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginnin9 of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following agencies shall provide verification to the Building and Safety Department that all pertinent Conditions of Approval and applicable have been met: A. Planning Department B. Temecula Union School District C. Fire District D. Engineerin9 Department E. Rancho California Water District F. Department of Building and Safety G. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Services ( DEHS ) H. CATV Franchise. Architectural elevations of all proposed structures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. The elevations shall substantially conform to those approved by the Planning Commission. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit seven ~7 ) copies of perking, landscaping, shading and irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348. All site amenities, including landscaping and irrigation, as shown on plans approved by the Planning Department, shall be installed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping shall utilize drought tolerant STAFFRPT\PP11622 1 i~ndscaping wherever feasible. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition, planting within ten 110) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty 130) inches. Landscapin9 plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees along the streets and within the parking areas. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of such approval, or, in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. Applicant shall submit the site plan as approved by the Planning Department to the Department of Building and Safety concurrent with application for building permits. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 11622 or as amended by these conditions. All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained with double or hairpin lines on the surface of the facility. 10. Any lights used to illuminate the site shall be designed so as to reflect away from adjoining properties and public thoroughfares. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Southwest Area Plan. 11. Signs shall be reviewed under separate application. 12. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Riverside County Department of Health Services prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. 15. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 16. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new STA F F R PT\PP 11622 2 building and parkin9 structure. 17. 18. 19. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of planrings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Buildin9 and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good workin9 order. A minimum of 191 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3LI~. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3) inches on four 14) inches of Class II base. A minimum of 5 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking space reserved for he handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one I1 ) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. I n addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least three 13) square feet in size. Enqineerinq Department PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT: 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of plans. 22. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. STAFFRPT\PP11622 3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit four ~4) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 24. The developer shall submit four 14) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 25. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 26. A 9rading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 27. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer. 28. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. 29. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. 30. The developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e. , concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities and by securing a drainage easement. 31. The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. 32. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge need to be paid. 33. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. 34. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 35. A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. This study shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed conditions, including hydrology and hydraulic calculations. STAFFRPT\PP11622 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 36. Prior to occupancy, construct f~J J ~J ~ ~IA~ J ~)5~~E~; J ~J ~J ~ 16~ l~)~ JJrJlJ~l~ ~ ~1~1 ~/l~rjl~14~ drive approaches, and install parkway trees and street lights on Diaz Road. 37. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 38. All driveways shall be constructed perpendicular (90 degrees) to street. 39. Dedication shall be made or shown to exist to provide the following right-of- way on the following streets: Dedicate Diaz Road to 50 feet from street centerline. 4O. All existing and new utilities, adjacent to and on site, shall be placed underground in accordance with City Standards, prior to occupancy. 41. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. Prior to occupancy, a signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered traffic engineer, and approved by the City Engineer, for all streets 66/~4 or wider and shall be included in the street improvement plans. All signing and striping shall be installed per the City standards and the approved signing and striping plan. Fire District 43. The above referenced project is protected by the Riverside County Fire District. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel, the owner shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection development requirements. A minimum fire flow for all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546 shall apply. 45. Provide a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. STAFFRPT\PP11622 5 47. 48. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2 1/2 x 2 1/2), will be located not less that 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 fee of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the buildingi s) . A statement that the buildingl s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. Install a supervised water-flow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as required by the Uniform Building Code. in lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building l s ) must be area separated into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section 505(e) of the Uniform Building Code. install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee. STAFFRPT\PP11622 6 57. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. 58. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must appear on the title page of the buildin9 plans. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 59. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The new development in this case includes a total of 5.13 acres. At the current fee rate of $1,970.00 per acre, the mitigation charge equals $10,106.00. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If Area Drainage Plan fees or mitigation charges have already been paid on this property in conjunction with an earlier land division or land use case, the developer should contact the District to ascertain what charges are actually due. 60. A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along with supporting hydrolagic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading or buildin9 permits. 61. All new buildings should be floodproofed to at least elevation 1015.4. 62. Two-thirds of the site shall be graded to drain to Diaz Road and the remainder graded to drain to the channel to the southwest. Buildinq and Safety 63. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. 64. 65. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct tom the Building and Safety Department. The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two (2) weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final inspection. Temecula Union School District 66. This project is subject to State law requirements for school impact mitigation. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Services 67. Water purveyor shall be the Rancho California Water District. Submit evidence of service availability to the City Department of Building and Safety concurrent with application for building permits. S:T AFFRPT\PP11622 7 58. Sewage disposal shall be by Eastern Municipal Water District. Submit evidence of service to the City Department of Buildin9 and Safety concurrent with application for buildin9 permits. 69. A clearance letter from the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch (Jon Mohoroski (714) 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: a. Underground storage tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB , .85) d. Waste reduction management. 70. Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, includin9 a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbin9 schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. Eastern Municipal Water District 71. Any and all necessary regionally sized on-site and off-site gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitorin9 manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed alon9 lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD regulations will be allowed. Rancho California Water District 72. The proposed project is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service will be available to the site upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability will be contingent upon the property owner signing and Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. STAFFRPT\PP11622 8 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Background 1. Name of Proponent: 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Date of Environmental Assessment: Agency Requirin9 Assessment: Name of Proposal, if applicable: Location of Proposal: Spectrum Contractinq, Inc. 46750 Rainbow Canyon Road Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-0057 August 8, 1990 CITY OF TEMECULA Plot Plan No. 11622 27800 Block of Diaz Road II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: ae Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? X Ce Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? X e® Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? X STAFFRPT\PP11622 I Yes Maybe No Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or re9ionally? Water· ~Vill the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Ce Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, includin9, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? fe Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or 9round waters? X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11622 Yes Maybe No Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- in9 or tidal waves? Plant Life· Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (includin9 trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life· Will the proposal result Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals {birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X X X X X X X X X X 5TAFFRPT\PP11622 3 Yes Maybe No 10. 11. 12. 13. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal resuit in: Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset· Will the proposal involve: A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? TransportationJCirculation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11622 4 Yes Maybe No 15. 16. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existin9 transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or 9oods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? ee Maintenance of public facilities, includin9 roads? f. Other governmental services: Energy. Will the proposal result in: ae Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? be Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11622 5 Yes Maybe No 17. 18. 19. 20. b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excludin9 mental health)? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Recreation· Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existin9 recreational opportunities? Cultural Resources. ae Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? be Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic buildin9, structure, or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical chan9e which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X X X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11622 6 Yes Maybe No 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental 9oals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while Ion9- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? ( A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11622 7 Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation Water 3.a,d-e. No. The proposed project will not affect any body of water. The closest body of water to the site is Murrieta Creek which is approximately one-half mile away. 3.b-c,9. No. The proposed project will increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on the site which will reduce the amount of water absorption. However, the introduction of irrigation to the site will be off-set the water absorption rate. Drainage patterns will continue to flow to the streets and channels. 3.f. No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or rate of flow of 9round waters. 3.h. No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply o system. 3.i. Yes. The proposed project is within the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan and watershed area. To help mitigate the project's impact, a flood mitigation charge shall be paid. No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the plant species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or endangered species should be affected. New species of plants will be introduced to the site as par of the landscape requirements for the project. The addition of the new species is not considered a negative impact. It is not clear by the plot plan if the existing Eucalyptus trees on the site will remain. Due to their maturity, as many should be retained as possible. The site is not currently used for agricultural purposes. Animal Life 5,a. No. The proposed project is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a number of years. It is anticipated that the only animal life on or in the vicinity of the site includes squirrels, rabbits, lizards, and other animals common to the area. It is highly unlikely that an endangered specie habitates the site. Maybe. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Habitat area. To mitigate the loss of habitat to this endangered species, the applicant shall be required to pay a fee according to Ordinance No. 663. Noise 6.3. Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since the surrounding land uses are not noise sensitive. STAFFR PT\PP11622 8 6.b. No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project. Liqht and Glare No. The proposed project is located within the Mt. Palomar Observatory Street Lightin9 Policy Area which recommends the use of low pressure sodium vapor I LPSV) lights to help avoid interference with the Mt. Palomar telescope known as "Skyglow". The use of LPSV lights will reduce the light and 91are produced by the proposed project. Land Use No. The Southwest Area Plan designates the subject site for General Light Industrial. The surroundin9 land uses are also office and light manufacturing. Natural Resources No. The proposed use will not increase the consumption rate of any natural or non-renewable natural resource. Risk of Upset 10,a. Maybe· If the manufacturing tenant uses any hazardous materials in their operation, a list of hazardous substances and disposal plan shall be submitted to the City. 10.b. No. Durin9 construction, it should not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with emergency vehicles. If street or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City and Police Department. Population 11. No. The proposed office/industrial building will generate some jobs but not a significant amount to alter the area's population. Housinq 12. No. The proposed office/industrial building will not generate a significant number of jobs to create a demand for additional housing. T ran sportation / Ci rcu I ation 13.a,c. Maybe. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to and from the site. However, it is not anticipated that this increase will be significant. The traffic that is generated by the project may add an incremental impact to the Rancho California Road/1-15 and Winchester Road/l-IS Interchanges which are currently operatin9 at capacity during peak hours. This potential impact may be mitigated by a transportation improvement mitigation fee. 13.b. Yes. The proposed project will require parking to support the use. Based on a 76,028 square foot building, the project will need 152 parkin9 spaces. The proposed plan illustrates 191 spaces. STAFFRPT\PP11622 9 13,d. No. The proposed project will not alter the present patterns of circulation movements. 13.e. No. The proposed project will not affect waterborne, rail or air traffic. 13.f. Maybe. Any increase in traffic may increase the potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Public Services 14.a,b,e. Yes.' The proposed industrial/office use will require public services in the areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and public facilities. This impact is not considered significant. The incremental impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees assessed. Property taxes should mitigate the impact and continuing need for services over the long term. 14.c,d,f. No. The project should not have a substantial effect on these public services. Enerqy 15.a-b. No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use or increase in demand of fuel or energy. Utilities 16.a-f. No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will not require substantial alteration to the exiting systems. Human Health 17a-b. Maybe. If hazardous substances are stored in the warehouse, then that may create a potential health hazard. If hazardous materials will be warehoused at the site, a plan for their use and disposal should be submitted to the City. Aesthetics 18. No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open to the public. The elevations of the proposed project are consistent in architectural materials as the surrounding buildings. Recreation 19. No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses. Cultural Resources 20.a-d. No. The subject site has previously been mass graded and it is unlikely that the project will result in the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site. If a site is discovered, an archaeologist or paleontologist should be called on site to supervise the digging and determine if the site is significant. The proposed project will not impact any building of historic significance, affect unique ethnic STAFFRPT\PP11622 10 cuitura~ values or restrict sacred uses. Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance 21 .a-c. No. The proposed project will not si9nificantly environment, have long term environmental considerable cumulative impacts. affect the natural impacts or have 21 .d. Maybe. If the proposed use warehouses hazardous materials, the project may cause a health hazard to human beings and wildlife. If hazardous materials are to be warehoused at the project, a plan for their use and disposal should be developed and approved by the City. The project may also have a substantial impact on the existin9 transportation system. To mitigate the potential impact at the Rancho California Road/I-15 Interchan9e, a traffic mitigation fee should be paid. STAFFRPT\PP11622 11 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ticant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVI RONMENTA '~~7/~ required. For CITY O~TEMECU~A X STAFFRPT\PP11622 12 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO.11622 TO CONSTRUCT FIVE I NDUSTR IAL BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE 27800 BLOCK OF DIAZ ROAD. WHEREAS, Sepctrum Contracting, Inc. filed Plot Plan No. 11622 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plans on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot Plans; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months followin9 incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: ~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. 12) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. STAFFRPT\PP11622 1 Ic) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plans are consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: I1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. 12 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: ~a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 11622 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: ~ 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. {2 ) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plans proposed conform to the logical development of its proposed site, and STAFFRPT\PP11622 2 are compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Plannin9 Commission hereby approves Plot Plan No. 11622 to construct five industrial buildings located on the 27800 block of Diaz Road subject to the followin9 conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of October, 1990 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\PP11622 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No. 11622. DATED: By Name Title STAFFRPT\PP11622 4 ITEM NO. 4- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Plannin9 Department October 16, 1990 Plot Plan No. 11759 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Steve Jiannino Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: Jeff Hardy Architecture Jeff Hardy Architecture To construct a 18,300 square foot industrial buildin9. North of Enterprise Circle South, south of Winchester Road. M-SC ( Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) North: M-SC (Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) South: M-SC (Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) East: M-SC (Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) West: M-SC ( Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant STAFFRPT\PP11759 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant DISCUSSION: At a duly advertised public hearing on October 1, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Plot Plan No. 11759 by a vote of 4-0 with the following changes to the Conditions of Approval: Replace Engineering Conditions as presented at the meeting - replaced page 5 of the Conditions of Approval. Change Condition No. 7 by changin9 the word "applicant" to "owner/developer"· Change to Condition No. 9 by deletin9 "with double or hairpin lines on the surface of the facility". Change Condition No. 35 by replacin9 "A . C. pavement" with "concrete pavement". STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 11759 based on the findings in the attached Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as amended at the Planning Commission hearing of October 1, 1990. SJ: ks Attachments: 1. Draft Minutes of October 1, 1990 Plannin9 Commission Meetin9 2. Plannin9 Commission Staff Report Packet dated October 1, 1990 STAFFRPT\PP11759 2 ANNJNG COMMISSION NINUTES DRAF i 3, 3990 ?he Commission expressed concern in g the project lg that lilt/ire llses of the sit, y callse the project to be ~rparked. They also e .sed concern for the ]ack of ate trash facj] for the size of the Droject and roposed 1 zone. COMMISS]ONF.;~ FAHEY me to close the public bearing and not adopt the Negat aration for Plot Plan No. ]]609, not adopt so]l]t~ , add deny Plot Plan No. 11609, Reau t ~or Site a[, and directed sta~ to work wjtb e applicant in re ~l~ign~ng the parking area to ind' .ate adeguate parking al~,~ ~lso address f. be~r CoD .erns w~th ~be ]o~at.]on of the djng area. I Ford Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMM I SS I ONERS: None CO~I SSIONERS Hoag] and 7. PI.OT PLAN NO. ].1759 7.] Proposa] to construct an 38,300 square foot industrial building on the north side of Enterprise Circle, west of Jefferson ~venue. STEVE JONANOE provided the staff report on this project. He stated that the building would be used for a cabinet shoD. JOHN MIDDI,ETON requested Condition No. 35 be amended to read "Construct A.C. or concrete pavement". After Cornmission discussion, ConditiOn No. 35 was amended to read "Construct concrete pavement improvements". JEFF HARDY, Jeff Hardy Architecture, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, requested the following modifications to the Conditions of Approval: No. 7, rep]ace the word applicant with owner/developer; No. 9, if not a City requirement would ]ike to utilize single line striping for parking stalls. MIN.10/I/90 -9- 10/10/90 PI,ANNJNG COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER ], 3 990 The Commission expressed concern for the location and number of du~t/trasb reciprocals. The applicant and the Commission agreed that rather than place them inside the building, they should be placed outside the building wj. th a wall to properly screen them. COMMISSIONER FAHF~ moved to c] ose the public hearing and adopt the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 11759, adopt Resolution No. 90- , and approve Plot Plan No. 11759, Request for Site Approval, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval amended as follows: Condition No. 7 to read "The owner/developer shall"; Condition No. 9 to remain as written; Condition No. 35 to read "Construct concrete pavement"; and with the addition of Condition No. 58 which wj]] address the location of the trash enclosure, based on staff's anatysis and approval, added by the addition of another trash biD. GARY THORNHILL suggested that this Condition be incorporated in the Planning DePartment Conditions. COMMISSIONER FORD seconded the motion, which carried as follows: AYES: 4 COME l SSI ONERS: B] ai r, Fahey, Ford, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hoag]and at Wl. ncL~qter Road and 30565 Estero Str . STEVl JONANOE prov3d~d the s. ._ . '-- '. · JOHN MIDDLETON request~; c~e folluu~n9 modifications to the Conditions oi ova]: No. 21(8) delhi^ the reference to "sidewalk"' o. ~3 amended to read "a minl,,,d~ ceDter]ine .ade shall be 0.50 percent"; and No. 3b amende o read "(36-60)"; and ~eplace pages 3 and 4 of - Conditions of Approval wjt~ amended pages 3 and the.c %t,d 0' MIN. 10/1/90 -10- 10/10/90 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, 1990 Case No,: Plot Plan No. 11759 Prepared By: Deborah Parks Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Jeff Hardy Architecture Jeff Hardy Architecture To construct a 18,300 square foot industrial buildin9. North of Enterprise Circle South, south of Winchester Road. M-SC IManufacturin9 - Service Commercial) North: M-SC (Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial ) South: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) East: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) West: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant STAFFR PT\PP11759 1 BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: The application for Plot Plan No. 11759 was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on January 29, 1990. The proposal was reviewed by the Riverside County Land Division Committee on February 22, 1990 with additional information requested of the applicant. In April 1990, the file was transferred to the City of Temecula. The development request was reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee on August 30, 1990. The proposed project consists of one industrial buildin9. The intended tenant of the 18,300 square foot buildin9 is Ability Cabinet. The buildin9 is for the manufacturin9 of cabinets and does not have any office space. The applicant anticipates a maximum of 50 employees on the largest shift. Ci rculati on / T raffic The City's Engineering Department reviewed the Traffic Study which was prepared for the proposed project by the applicant's Traffic Engineer. The City's Engineering Department determined that the proposed development will not generate an excessive number of trips for the designated land use for the parcel. Since the City is collecting a fee for the Temecula City-wide Road Benefit Fund, additional mitigation will not be necessary. Parkinq/Internal Circulation The proposed project requires 25 parking spaces, based on the largest shift of employees to be 50. The plot plan proposes 36 spaces and 2 loading spaces. Primary access to the site will be provided off of Enterprise Circle South via one driveway. Access can also be provided by the alley on the north side of the property. The alley is being formed by the projects along Enterprise Circle South and Winchester Road in complying with the industrial business park's CCSR's. The alley is not a public dedication and will be privately maintained. A Condition of Approval has been added, No. 36, to require that the applicant construct A.C. pavement improvements a minimum of 24 foot wide for reciprocal access across the north property line to join with existing asphalt paving to the west. This STAFFRPT\PP11759 2 Condition of Approval will extend the alley east from its existing terminus. The internai site circulation plan provides adequate space to comfortably drive through the project, park, and load. GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Architectural Compatibility/Landscapinq The proposed exterior elevation is consistent in materials and style with surrounding industrial developments. The materials to be used include concrete tilt-ups, glass, and concrete tile. The primary color of the building will be ivory. The glass, panels, and roof tile will accent the building with shades of grey. Approximately 1896 of the project site is covered with landscaping. Along Enterprise Circle South, there will be a 16 foot tandscape setback between the sidewalk and parking stalls which will be betreed. The front of the building will also be heavily landscaped which will help soften the industrial nature of the building. The project site is designated LI (General Light Industrial) by the Southwest Area Plan iSWAP). The proposed project is consistent with the general policies of SWAP· It is anticipated that the project as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's forthcoming General Plan. An Initial Study has been completed for the project and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposal. FINDINGS: Site Approval The proposed use will not have a substantial adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. The use will not generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic or other disturbances. The site for the proposed use has adequate aCCeSS. STAFFRPT\PP11759 3 The proposed project will not inhibit or restrict future ability to use active or passive solar energy systems. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in the staff report· There is a probability that the project will not deter, or interfere with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the new General Plan. These findin9s are supported by staff analysis, minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. The lawful conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and 9eneral welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plannin9 Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 11759, ADOPT Resolution No. 90- and APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11759, Reques~ for 5ire Approval, based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. DP:ks Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibits 3. Conditions Of Approval initial Study STAFFRPT\PP11759 DESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO.11759 TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,300 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. WHEREAS, Jeff Hardy & Associates filed Plot Plan No. 11759 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; · WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plans on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot Plans; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That theTemecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: J l ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. 12 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of bui|ding permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial · STAFFRPT\PP11759 1 detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plans are consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: I1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. ( 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 11759 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.301c), no plot plan may be approved unless the followin9 findings can be made: 11 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law STAFFRPT\PP11759 2 and City ordinances. 12) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plans proposed conform to the logical development of its proposed site, and are compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot Plan No. 11759 to construct an 18,300 square foot industrial building subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION q.. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of October, 1990 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\PP11759 3 Z -4 Z t- Z 3:1, Z '..:; Z Z O f~ Jeff Hardy & As.oc. Architecture NEW FACILITY FOR ABILITY CABINETS CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No. 11759 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department This approval shall be used within two 12 ) years of the Planning Commission approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By this approval within the two 12) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval· Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following agencies shall provide verification to the Buildin9 and Safety Department that all pertinent Conditions of Approval and applicable have been met: A. Planning Department B. Temecula Union School District C. Fire District D. Engineering Department E. Rancho California Water District F. Department of Building and Safety G. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Services I DEH5 ) H. CATV Franchise· Architectural elevations of all proposed structures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. The elevations shall substantially conform to those approved by the Planning Commission. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit seven (7) copies of perking, landscaping. shading and irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 3q8. All site amenities, including landscaping and irrigation, as shown on plans approved by the Planning Department, shall be installed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping shall utilize drought tolerant landscaping wherever feasible. An automatic sprinkler system shall be STAFFRPT\PP11759 1 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. 16. ~nsEalled and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition, planting within ten ~ 10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees along the streets and within the parking areas. The ~!6161jt~l~f owner/developer shall agree to defend at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of such approval, or, in the alternative, to relinquish such approval· The ~J/)J6JJl~l/l~ owner/developer shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action· The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the a~lbI ie~a~s~ owner/developer of his obligations under this condition· Applicant shall submit the site plan as approved by the Planning Department to the Department of Building and Safety concurrent with application for building permits. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 11759 or as amended by these conditions. All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained with, Any lights used to illuminate the site shall be designed so as to reflect away from adjoining properties and public thoroughfares. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Southwest Area Plan. Signs shall be reviewed under separate application. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Riverside County Department of Health Services prior to Certificate of Occupancy. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 ) year, this approval shall become null and void. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by payin9 the appropriate fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new building and parking structure. STAFFRPT\PP11759 2 18. 19. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be proper)y constructed and in good working order. A minimum of 36 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be surfaced with aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three inches on four {4) inches of Class II base. A minimum of 2 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking space reserved for he handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one ~ 1 ) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. I n addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least three 13) square feet in size. Enqi neerinq Del~artment The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. STAFFRPT\PP11759 3 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 21. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; and CATV Franchise. 22. The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of plans. 23. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. 24. The developer shall submit four 14) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 25. The developer shall submit four 14) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2LI"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 26. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 27. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 28. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d- way. 29. The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT 30. All work done within the City right-d-way shall have an encroachment permit. 31. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards and shall be shown on the grading plan. 32. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the STAFFRPT\PP11759 ~ Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 33. A 24 foot minimum reciprocal access easement shall be shown to exist or recorded between the applicants and Lot 22 to the north of the applicant's site. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 34. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, includin9 that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the El R/ Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. 35. Construct Al ~1 I~i~/~r~;~ concrete pavement improvements a minimum 24 foot wide for reciprocal access alon9 the northerly property line to join with existing ~lSl~i~J ;~ I~i~j I~t concrete payin9 to the west of applicant's property. Riverside County Department of Health 36. "Will-serve" letters from the water and sewerin9 agencies. 37. If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch I Jon Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: a. Underground storage tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Service. c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure {in accordance with AB 2185). d. Waste reduction management. Fire Department 38. The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildin9s usin9 the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 39. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. STAFFRPT\PP11759 5 49. 50. 51. 52. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants ( 6"x~"x2 1/2x2 1 J2 ), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be availabJe from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. ApplicantJdeveloper shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shali be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building( s) . A statement that the buildingl s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to required by the Uniform Building Code. Plans must be installation, as A statement that the building will be automatically fir sprinklered must appear on the title page of the building plans. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 503. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 908. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicantJdeveloper shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee. STAFFRPT\PP11759 6 53. Final conditions wiIl be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. Buildinq & Safety Department The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two (2) weeks processin9 time to obtain all required clearances prior to the final inspection. Temecula Unified School District 55. This project is subject to State law requirements for School impact mitigation. Eastern Municipal Water District 56. Any and all necessary regionally sized on-site and off-site gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD regulations will be allowed. Rancho California Water District 57. The proposed project is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service will be available to the site upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability will be contingent upon the property owner signing and Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. STAFFRPT\PP11759 7 :IiVER iDE COUn .u PLAnnin DEPAR[rnEn[ May 29, 1987 Compaction Labs, Inc. P. 0. Box 271338 Escondido, CA 92017 Attention: Mr. Alan Sargent Subject: Liquefaction Hazard Project No. CL-1468 Parcel Map 21592 County Geologic Report No. 378 Rancho California Area Dear Mr. Sargent: We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of the following reports: 1. Preliminary Soils Investigation for 5 Acre Commercial Site, Southeast Corner of Highway 79 and 1-15, Rancho California, by Compaction Labs, Inc., dated February 12, 1986. e Limited Soils Investigation, Liquefaction Potential, Intersection Highway 79 and 1-15, by Construction Engineering, dated August 21, 1986; revision dated April 30, 1987. Seismic Information, Wildomar Fault, Temecula, CA, by Dennis Middleton, dated August 18, 1986; and revised Seismic Investigation, dated April 16, 1987. These reports determined that liquefaction is not likely to occur at this site. It was concluded that the proposed development is feasible and that no extraordinary mitigation measures be undertaken with respect to liquefaction. It is our opinion that the report was performed in a manner consistent with the "state-of-the-art" and satisfies the additional information requested 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 Compaction Labs, Inc. 2 - May 29, 1987 under the California Environmental Quality Act review and Seismic Safety Element of the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNT PLANNI G DEPARTMENT Roge ree er P1 nl ng D1 rector Steven A.' n SAK:rd c.c. Terraton Corp.-Applicant Larry Markham & Associates Norm Lostbom-~ldg. & Safety (2) Planning Team i ( _'-,'L~ ~,, I111 ,e,l~nllJk PLANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405 INDIO. CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTlOb; GLEN I NEx, VMAN [:IRE CI{IEF August 10, 1990 PLANNING & ENGINEERING 3760 [2TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92~al (714) 275-4777 TO: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: CUP #4 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546· Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire hydrant (6"x4"x2~x2i), located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along vehicular travelways. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water system is capable of delivering 2000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. 5. Height of canopy must have a minimum 13'6" vertical clearance. 6. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 7. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. RE: CUP ;:4 Page 2 8. Applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining underground tank permits from both the County Health and Fire Departments. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer sh~ll be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee. 11. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist rmac STATE OF CALiFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, I~O BOX 231 APR 1 ,r; 19 0 RiVERSiDE CDlji-i'Pf GEORGE DEUKMEjtAN Gove,r,c, Development Review 08-Riv-79-19.7~ Your Reference: PP 11884 Planning Department Attention Mr. John Ristow County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Ristow: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Plot Plan No. 11884 located at the southeast corner of Bedford Court and State Route 79 in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or used by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours, H. N. LEWANDOWSKI , District Permits Engineer Att. cc: Lee Johnson, Riverside County Road Department DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT~ DISTRICT 8.P.O BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINC, CA 92402 April 6, 1990 A NH4,3 DE RTM NT GEORGE DUEKMEJIAN. Governzr Your Reference: PP 11884 08-Riv-79-19.7+ Planning Department Attentlon: Mr. John Ristow County of Riverside Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Rlstow: On April 3, 1990, a letter of review and a "HANDOUT" was sent to your offlce regarding the above-noted Plot Plan. Unfortunately, an oversight occurred whereby the necessary Traffic Index information was not included in one of the General Notes required to be placed on the plans. The information to be included in that note is as follows: ... A Traffic Index (TI) of 11.5 shall be used in the design of the Travelled Way and a TI of 7.5 shall be used for the shoulder design .... If you should have any questions, please call Mr. Jim Neville at (714) 383-4384. Thank you for your cooperation. SIncerely, H. N. Lewandowski District Permit Engineer D~e: A~rli 3, 1990 (Co-Rte-PM,, PP 11884 /Your Referenre., ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: State Route 79 shall be lmprcved to its ultimate width for the entire length of the property. If channelizatlon is required from three lanes to a lesser width, it shall be done with strlplng to State standards. The street improvements shall be dimensioned from the "planned centerline", not the existing centerline as shown. 3. A landscaping plan must be submitted. County Planning Department: Our records indicate two potential Right-of-Way (R/W) half-widths at this location. They are as follows: a) b) Urban Arterlat Highway (134 ft. R/W) Ranpac's preliminary drawings for AD 159 (142 ft R/W) Please provide this office with a set of the latest drawings/information (including a Typical Section) regarding th~s matter in order that we might better coordinate our agencIes' efforts for proposals along the lower portion of Route 79. The latest Ranpac drawings in our records show a typical cross- section for Route 79 which calls for a street improvement half- width of 48 ft. and does not include curb and gutter. The lack of curb and gutter is unacceptable on an Urban Arterial. It has been our understanding for some time that the State highway was to have.a half-width of 55 ft. with A2-8 curb and gutter along all portions of lower Route 79 from east of Butterfield Stage Road to its intersection with Route 1-15. Please lnclude your latest information on this matter with your transmittal of the drawings requested above. ('r'aur Reference ?fan checker WE ~,'OL'LD LIKE TO NOTE: Z~LT?..~,N3 tE'.EL/F'.'E',i ?E'.'iE- Date Rue Ccr~u~ztic~liUc~ w~s.n present or proposed State .-.ght of ~av s~ouid De hnvest~gaue~ far potential hazardous ~aste (asbestos, petr~cha=Lc~]~, etc. ) an~ ~ugacaj as per requirements of regu!atcry. agenZes. (/' W~ plans are submitted, pie conform to the requirements of the attached '!~andout". h wi expedite the reuew pr~ess and t~ne requzred for Plan C~. Air. hough the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do n~t appear to have a significant effect on ~ state hi~t~way system, consideratlon Fraust be ~zven to the curm,l~tive effect of ccnt:aued deveiornPnu m this are. .Any ~ures nece~ to mtigate t~ cum,l~Uve ~.l~t of traffic and dr~e st~l~ De prov'lc~ prior to or ~th d~veiopment of r/~e arm that r.~-~ltates r_he~. It appears that rR~ traffic and draLnage ~enerated by r,his propoeal could have a sigruficant effect on t~he state high~ey systen of the are. Any .,-,~ures necessary to mitigate the traffic and dra3mage h,lpacts sh~l l be lnclu/ed with the develo~mmlt. lkis portion of state D.igh~ey LS inciuded Ln t~he C. ahfornia i~-ter Plan of State H.i~mays ~li gi bl~ for Official Scenlc hLi~j~ey Designation, and Ln tile future your aEer~y my offi~iM ly designated as a state scan. tc bigmay. ltUs portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state seetic hiSh~y, and develop~nt in r_his corridor should be coletible w%th the somn. tc hl~ey concept. It is recoca~ r~mt there is cor~derable public concern ax :t noise levels adjacent to r~mviiy r. raveled hi~ays, Land develo~mnt, ~n orc~r to be ~tibie '-j. th r_his ccnc~rn, may require ~ noL~e attenuation m~are~. D~velol~n~nt of pro!:~rty should inc_'.~l~ any ~e-_~ry noL~e atr.~nu~on. WE REQUEST ~[AT THE ITDiS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN iHE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide _a~lhalf-width on the state highway. Normal street improvements to provide ~! half-width on the state highway. Curb and gutter, State Standard~'~along the state highway. Parkin8 shall be prohibited along the state highway by painting and/or by the proper p~cement of "no parking" signs. the curb red ~61 radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway. standard wheelchair ramp must be provided in the returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway. Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highway. Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by existing public road connections. Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by driveways. standard Ve%tcular a,~'--" to the state h~=~ay s~j_L ~e prov~d~d by a r:n~1-~_)~e cc~.nazt:on. ',ei~cula- M cctrezU. cr~ sr~l! be ~ve~ a: Lee~ ~m.n ~_~a s~:e r_'. .~r, ay r.~,: 3f '.ev. .-tc. ass point3 :o ~J~ state ~limay m~l l be ~sveloped ~n a for tl along '_~ state /Landscaplns along the state ni~rr, ay m-ell ~e low and for~iv'in~ ~n nature. A left-turn lane, ~ncluning any ner~ry ~dan.u~, st~]t be provtdad on tie state at C~nsidararion s~I~ be ~!ven co Ue provts~on, or fu:ure provision, of s~n~l~,~r_ton and of ~ ~tarsect:.on of ~ ~ou A ~raff~c study ~n~ca~n~ on- and off-~e flow pertains ar~ vohmms, F~'obsble ~u-~ts, and pro~ ..l.r_!.~a~ic~ ilw~ures s~l] be Adequate off-~tree~ perkzu~, w~ich ~oes no~ require 'mck:Ul cxlto the state ~iMh~ay, s~l 1 ~e ~rovtdaI. Handicap pm~ng .~mli ~c be developed m the busy ck--ive~y mm arm. /Care s~m~ ~e takan ~n davelopin~ tins property ~o presan'e z~4 perpetmta U~ exzst:,nS c~ [ltterrl Of t]~ .,rtate .hi!~l~y. ~ZC,,t~r C(Xl~ld~llticXl s~lm:)ulcl 'Le ~i. vell tO clzxllar_lve ljY. res.fed storrrt runoff to ~nsure r~at a ,nCJ~.ay dra~naBe proOlen is not crests. ~y necef~ary no~se attenuatioml shml l be provldad as pert of '-".e daveio~]~t of r_h. iS property. ?lsase refer to actac. teo ad~uional corn'ants. REQUEST: / A co~ of a~ &//' A copy of any ~E REQUEST ~//'Any pro~x~l copy of  ,~check print c~ions of approval or revised approval. doctrr~ts pro~di~8 addicicns.L state highly ri~u of ~ey upm recordati~ of the nap, ~i O??C?~iU,qITY TO R.EVIE;~ DCRING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: uo f'.urr,~er c~ve],op r, his property, traffic or env%ronne~tal study, of U~ i~arc~ or Tra~u ,,~p, of r_ha PL~s for any ~-,lrove,~nts wit~U.q the state hi~j~ay right of ~y. of m~ Gr-aC~'~ and [~e Plans for rJ~i~ property ~ av~i l~hle. STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 924.02 TDD (7141 383-4609 August 20, 1990 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Gove,,~c, Development Review 08-Riv-79-19.7 Your Reference: CUP 4 City of Temecula Attention Steve Padovan Development Review Committee 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Mr. Padovan: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed gasoline service station located at the southeast corner of Bedford Court and State Route 79 in the City of Temecula. This proposal was reviewed earlier by this office in April, 1990 for the County of Riverside. All comments made in our letter dated April 3, 1990 are still valid. Please find enclosed a copy of this letter. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Mike Sim of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours, TIM C OWDHURY District Development Review Engineer Att. $fi~! C~ CALiFO~NIA--~IS~NE~S, TRAF,~K~TiT1GN AND H~SING AGEN~ ~EpARTMENT OF TRANS~RTATION ~S~ 8. PO. BOX 231 ~N ~RNARDINO, ~LIF~NIA ~ TDD ~1~) 383~ April 3, 1990 GEORGE DE.Jrk~AE,,,,~N, Oo~en"~r Development Review 08-Riv-79-19.7+ Your Reference: PP 11884 Planning Department Attention Mr. John Ristow County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Ristow: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Plot Plan No. 11884 located at the southeast corner of Bedford Court and State Route 79 in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or used by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call our Development Review Section at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours, H. N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Att. cc: Lee Johnson, Riverside County Road Department ( your .Plan ChecKer / Dace 'L n F: e .z ,.,, . wOULD LIKE TO NC. TE: ~ ~t_tcrdl:i~Dlit::r. :::-': pre_s~,: or :rz~sed State nBnt of ,.ev s.-,~:L.i ae r,v~::_~.:~ for pat~r. ia! hazardous -.es:e ,, ~:r=s:os, Fer_rtc_-aT~r~]~, etc.; and ,r~ :_: _a :e: ~ .z :eq'~dL.~_.ergqts of reguia:cr'y ager, z:~- &," When plans are suhr_:Lei, zle~se conform :o z.he requa.r=,~.Ls of :~e at-z_ned ',~kndout". ?zs ~tL1 "" expedite the review zroc~= :_nC tune reqmzed for Plan C-~-_k. AlrR~ mhe traffic ~ t~-'.~age generated by ::%ts Fopcsal do not appee.r to ,have a significant effect on ~ sta~e h~y _~,'s.~-.. cansideratio~ ,,-Bat be ~.ve~ to the ctln~l~rz~e effect of can~ devetcn:f..,: in r~hj~ arm. .Any m~_-es r~ to n~%gate rte ctrajat.ive imp~zt of :raffic and draazage sh~l l be provedad prior to or ~-=:n de~_lopTent of tie aree that r~-~-ltatas them. It apSeera t_hat d~e ~.---__=f'_c and drainage ge~_ratsd by t~aa propteal could bare a significant effect on the state .high~ey s}.~_=n. of r.Re are. Any .Teesurea ~ to miti~ra the traffic and draa_nage L~LT~-ts stilt be inc!urRd ~lin d~ developrent. 7h/s penion of state n_~_~ay ~ included m the Cat ~ Fornia Mesrar Flat of State High~eys for Offered1 Scenic F~_ay ,De~,~nac.~on, and in rime future your agency ~By w~ to rave this route offit~]]y designate/as a Fate seepat higrr-~y. %his potrich of sate ~'~._~,---~ay has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and devel~.t in this corridor stud be ccr~.tible vith t/~e ~nic hi~.ey concept. It is re~ that '/here is considerable public cc~zern a~u~ no~se levels adjacent to ,heavily traveled highways. Land de~!opTent, in order :o be ccm~r~bie with rjd~ concern, my noise attenuation m~.res. Developtent of property should incl,x~ any ne!~ry noise atumueu~n. WE REQUEST THAT THE IF:'iS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide _iT half-width on the state highway. Normal street lm~rovements to provide ~1 ha!f-width on :he state highway. Parking shall.be prohibited along the state highway by painting the curd red and/or by the propex placement of "no parking" signs. ~6| radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway. A standard wheelchair ramp must be provided in the returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway. Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highway. Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by existing public road connections. . Vehicular access co :he state highway shall be provided by driveways. standard A ~eft-~urn ~:_.-~. L~L~,-'-,~g any r~ · A~ce off--,--c=e~ .mr.~Pq. w~c/n cces noc re~ire 'md<in~ c~to r~a state hig~ay, S~i~ ~e provided. FIe .~efer :: !::=c. _=z aCci~icDz! :crr.-r-~ts. ',.E REQUEST: / A copy of any ccnCi~io~a of approval or rev~ed appm~Bl. /A copy of ~y ~u prc~ ~=i~ sum ~y n~z of ~y u~ r~r~zm of ~ ~p. ~E REQUEST Y(,E i-PgcF, iU.qlTY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: , epy of ~e ~2flc cr ~~ sn~y~ ~ pint of =-a ~ ~ T~ ,'~p. ' ~ p~t of %-a P~ for ~y L~rO~ widen ~ ~ ~y n~ Of '~y. . d~ pint of =~ Gr~ ~ ~ge P~ for ~ pm~y ~ a~ble. Date: April 3, 1990 R1'.'-79-19.7 - (Co-Rte-PM) PP 11884 (Your Referencel DDITIONAL COMMENTS: State Route 79 shall be Improved to its ultimate width for the entire length of the property. If channelization is required from three lanes to a lesser width, it shall be done with striping to State standards. The street improvements shall be dimensioned from the "planned centerline", not the existing centeriine as shown. 3. A landscaping plan must be submltted. County Planning Department: Our records indlcate two potential Right-of-Way (R/W) half-widths at this location. They are as follows: a) b) Urban Arterial Hlghway (134 ft. R/W) Ranpac's preliminary drawings for AD 159 (142 ft R/W) Please provide this office with a set of the latest drawings/information !including a Typical Section) regarding this matter in order that we might better coordinate our agencies' efforts for proposals along the lower portion of Route 79. The latest Ranpac drawings in our records show a typical cross- section for Route 79 which calls for a street improvement half- width of 48 ft. and does not include curb and gutter. The lack of curb and gutter is unacceptable on an Urban Arterlai. It has been our understanding for some time that the State highway was to have a half-width of 55 ft. with A2-8 curb and gutter along all portions of lower Route 79 from east of Butterfield Stage Road to its intersection with Route 1-15. Please Include your latest information on this matter with your transmlztai of the drawings requested above. DATE: March 28, 1990 TO: Assessor Building and Safety - Land Use Building and Safety - Grading Surveyor - Ken Teich Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control District Fish & Game U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services County Superintendent of Schools Eastern Municipal Water District Rancho California Water District California Edisen Southern California Gas General Telephone Caltrans #8 Temecula Unified School District :)iVE iDE coun;.- PLannine DEPA ;mEn; Commissioner Turner San Bernardino County Museum/ UCR - ARu Community Plans 19 1990 RNERSlDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLOT PLAN 11884 - (Tm 5) - E.A. 34949 - Tomond Properties - Markham & Associates - Temecula Area - First Supervisorial District - Corner of SH 79 and Bedford Ct. - C-P-S Zone - .94 Acre - REQUEST: Gas station and Mini Mart - Mod 119 - A.P. 922-210-041 Please review the case described above, along with Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled clears, it will then go to public hearing. the attached case map. A Land for April 30, 1990. If it Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to April 30, 1990, in order that we may include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact John Ristow at 275-3298. Planner COIvNENTS: The parcel is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction excavation will impact nonrenewable paleontolcMgic resources. The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a site-specific program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic resources. This program should include: (1) monitoring of excavation by a qualified paleontol~ic monitor; (2) preparation of recovered specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils; (3) curation of specimens into an established repository; and {4) a report of findings with 4/I b/VU PLEASE print ha.me and title PHONE:- 798-8570 gm L)r. Al_ran U. r~riesemer, Museums Uzrector 4C5L' L~MC)!~ STREET, 9TM FLOOR c, ,,'=.~,-:.,~.~ CALIFORNIA 92501 46-209 OASIS STREET. RC".Z'M 304 INDIO, CALIFORN;A 922'01 )ATE: March 28, 1990 TO: Assessor Building and Safety - Land Use Building and Safety - Grading Surveyor - Ken Tei ch Road Department Heal th - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection F1 ood Control Di strict Fish & Game U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services County Superintendent of Schools Eastern Municipal Water District Rancho California Water District California Edisen Southern California Gas General Telephone Caltrans #8 Temecula Unified School District RiVERSiDE counc PLAnninG DEPaRtmEnt Commissioner Turner San Bernardino County Museum UCR - ARu Community Plans RY, IN ARU APR 02 1990 PLOT PLAN 11884 - (Tm 5) - E.A. 34949 - Ton~nd Properties - Markham & Associates - Temecula Area - First Supervisorial District - Corner of SH 79 and Bedford Ct. - C-P-S Zone - .94 Acre - REQUEST: Gas station and Mini Mart - Hod 119 - A.P. 922-210-041 Please review the case described above, along with Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled clears, it will then go to public hearing. the attached case map. A Land for April 30, 1990. If it Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to April 30, 1990, in order that we may include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact ~john Ristow at 275-3298. Planner COMMENTS: project bo ' lt~,Z* " inI construction, cultural resources are encountered, it is rec~,,~ea be reevaluated by a qualified archaeologist. DATE: 4/23/90 SIGNATURE PLEASE print name and title PHONE: 7R7-3885 gm FA-~TEGIN INFORMATION ~;i:NTER Archaeological Research Unit Univer~iHy of CdffrOrma l lversi e CA 92521 40b, D LEMON STREET, 9~'' FLOOR F{','ERStDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 46-209 OAS,~ STREET. RO<. f.' 304 INDIO, CALIFORNI;.. 92201 ~A1 cl~ Lt42-8277 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY II Backqround 1. Name of Proponent: Jeff Hardy & Associates Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 27620 Commerce Center Drive, #103 Temecula, CA 92390 171~) 676-1~15 Date of Environmental Assessment: Auqust 9, 1990 Agency Requiring Assessment: CITY OF TEMECULA Name of Proposal, if applicable: Plot Plan No. 11759 6. Location of Proposal: North of Enterprise Circle South, south of Winchester Road. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets· ) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X be Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? X Ce Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? X e® Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? X STAFFRPT\PP11759 1 Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltat·on, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslid·s, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? Yes X Maybe No X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 2 Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Plant Life· Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: ae Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 3 10. 11. 12. 13. Noise· Will the proposal result in: a. ~ncreases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare· Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticicles, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ae Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes X Maybe X X No X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 ~ 15. 16. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existin9 transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or 9oods? ee Alterations to waterborne, rai) or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered 9overnmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? ee Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services: Energy. Will the proposal result in: ae Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? be Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes Maybe No X X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 5 17. 18. 19. 20. b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard l excluding mental health ) ? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aestheticaliy offensive site open to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes Maybe X X No X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 6 21. Yes Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? __ Maybe X NO X X X STAFFRPT\PP11759 7 Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation Earth No. The proposed project will not result in cut and fill slopes. Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree and results in soil displacement, compaction and over-covering. Further analysis will determine if additional mitigations are required. No. Development of the proposed project will not require substantial grading. No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the site. Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the construction phase and remain high until disturbed areas are replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and significant but will be mitigated through minimal grading, retention of natural vegetation whenever feasible, and use of watering trucks and hydro-seeding disturbed areas after grading. No. There is no body of water near the project site which could be affected by the proposed project. Yes. The project site is located within a liquefaction and fault hazard zone area according to the Riverside County General Plan Geologic Hazard Map. A geologic report for the project should address these potential issues· Air 2. b-c. Maybe. Depending upon the amount of traffic generated by the project, an increase in carbon monoxide and particulate missions will occur. This impact is not considered significant since the air emissions from this project is only an incremental impact to the area's air quality. No. The proposed project should not create any objectionable odors or alter the area's climate. Water a,d-e. b-c,g. No. The proposed project will not affect any body of water. No. The proposed project will increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on the site which will reduce the amount of STAFFRPT\PP11759 8 ~. a-d. water absorption. However, the introduction of irrigation to the site will be off-set the water absorption rate. Drainage patterns will continue to flow to the streets and channels. No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or rate of flow of ground waters. No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply system. Yes. The proposed project is within the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan and watershed area. To help mitigate the project's impact, a flood mitigation charge shall be paid. No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the plant species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or endangered species should be affected. New species of plants will be introduced to the site as part of the landscape requirements for the project. The addition of the new species is not considered a negative impact. The site is not currently used for agricultural purposes. Animal Life 5. a-c. No. The proposed project is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a number of years· It is anticipated that the only animal life on or in the vicinity of the site includes squirrels, rabbits, lizards, and other animals common to the area. It is highly unlikely that an endangered species habitates the site. The project site is within the Stephen's Kangaroo Habitat Fee area and will be subject to habitat mitigation fees. Noise 6. a. Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since the surrounding land uses are not noise sensitive. No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project. STAFFRPT\PP11759 9 Liclht and Glare 7. Maybe. The proposed project is located within the Mr. Palomar Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the use of low pressure sodium vapor iLPSV) lights to help avoid interference with the Mr, Palomar telescope known as "Skygiow". The use of LPSV lights will reduce the tight and glare produced by the proposed project. Land Use 8. No. The surrounding land uses are commercial office and light manufacturing. Natural Resources 9. a-b. No. The proposed use will not increase the consumption rate of any natural or non-renewable natural resource. Risk of Upset 10. a. Maybe· If the manufacturing tenant uses any hazardous materials in their operation, a list of hazardous substances and disposal plan shall be submitted to the City. No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with emergency vehicles. If street or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City and Police Department. Population 11. No. The proposed project will generate some jobs but not a significant an~unt to alter the area's population. Housinq 12. No. The proposed project will not generate a significant number of jobs to create a demand for additional housing. Transportation / Ci rcu lation 13. a,c. Maybe. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to and from the site. However, it is not anticipated that this increase will be significant. The traffic that is generated by the project may add an incremental impact to the Winchester Road/ I-15 Interchange which is currently operating at capacity during STA FFR PT\PP11759 10 peak hours. This potential impact may be mitigated by a transportation improvement mitigation fee. Yes. The proposed project will require parking to support the use. Based on 18,300 square feet, the project will need 36 parking spaces. The proposed plan illustrates spaces. No. The proposed project will not alter the present patterns of circulation. No. The proposed project will not affect waterborne, rail or air traffic. Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyciists, or pedestrians. Public Services 14. a,b,e. c,d,f. Yes. The proposed project will require public services in the areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and public facilities. This impact is not considered significant. The incremental impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees assessed. Property taxes should mitigate the impact and continuing need for services over the long term. No. The project should not have a substantial effect on these public services. Enerqy 15. a-b. No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use or increase in demand of fuel or energy. Utilities 16. a-f. No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will not require substantial alteration to the exiting systems. Human Health 17 a-b. Maybe. If hazardous substances are stored in the warehouse, then that may create a potential health hazard. If hazardous materials will be warehoused at the site, a plan for their use and disposal should be submitted to the City. STAFFRPT\PP11759 11 Aesthetics 18. No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open to the public. The elevations of the proposed project are consistent in architectural materials as the surrounding buildings. Recreation 19. No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses. Cultural Resources 20. a-d. No. The subject site has previously been mass graded and it is unlikely that the project will result in the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site. If a site is discovered, an archaeologist or paleontologist should be called on site to supervise the digging and determine if the site is significant, The proposed project will not impact any building of historic significance, affect unique ethnic cultural values or restrict sacred uses. Mandatory Findinqs of 5iqnificance 21. a-c. No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the natural environment, have long term environmental impacts or have considerable cumulative impacts. Maybe. If the proposed use warehouses hazardous materials, the project may cause a health hazard to human beings and wildlife. If hazardous materials are to be warehoused at the project, a plan for their use and disposal should be developed and approved by the City. The project may also have a substantial impact on the existing transportation system. To mitigate the potential impact at the Winchester Road/I-15 Interchange, a traffic mitigation fee should be paid. STAFFRPT\PP11759 12 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. For CITY OF TEMECULA X STAFFRPT\PP11759 13 ITEM NO. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department October 16, 1990 Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT I ON: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Steve Jiannino Receive and File Robert Paine Benesh Engineering Corporation To subdivide a 1.43 acre parcel into two parcels. 30565 Estero Street, east of Ormsby Road R-R Rural Residential North: R - R South: R - R East: R-R West: R - R Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Single Family North: South: East: West: Single Family Vacant Vacant Vacant STAFF R PT\PM25538 1 DISCUSSION: At a duly advertised public hearing on October 1, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 by a vote of 4-0, with the following changes to the Conditions of Approval: Replaced Engineering Conditions as presented at the meeting - replaced Page 3 and Page 4 of the Conditions of Approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 based on the findings in the attached Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as amended at the Planning Commission hearing of October 1, 1990. SJ :ks Attachments: Draft Minutes of October 1, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission Staff Report Packet Dated October 1, 1990 STAFF R PT\PM25538 2 L I PI,ANN]NG COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER ], The Commission expressed concern for the locati, and number of dust/trash rec.~proca}s. The app]i t and the Commission agreed that rather than pla kem jnsjde the buj]din(~, t. bey should be p] side the building with a wall to properly 7 to read to remain as concrete t 58 wh.~ ch w.~ ] } a, based on sta: addj t,i OD O SS]ONER FAHF~ moved to c} ose public hearing and ado' ~he Negative Declaration Plot Plan No. 11759, adopt ~o]!~t~on No. 90- and approve Plot Plan No. 11759, lest f.'or Site An' , subiect to the attached Condit. ioDs Approva} as fo]lows: Condition No. owner/( loper shall"; Condition No. 9 jtion No. 35 to read "Construct with the addition of Condition No. the ]ocation of the trash enclosure, s ana sis and approval, added by the her t b.~n. GARY THORNHILl, suggested that t. hi Condition be )rporated in the Planning De Cond~ tj ODS. ONER FORD seconded the mot which carried as AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS. B]air, Fahey, Ford, Chiniaeff' NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: No COMN 1 ,~S ABSENT: ] ..... : . 8. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25538 8.] Proposa] to subdivide a ].43 acre parcel into two parcels at Winchester Road and 30565 Estero Street. STEVE JONANOE provided the staff report on this item. JOHN MIDDLETON requested the ~ollowing modifications to the Conditions of Approval: No. ?l(a) delete the reference to "sidewalk"; No. 33 amended to read "a minimum center]iDa grade shall be 0.50 percent"; and No. 35 amended to read "(36-60)"; and replace pages 3 and 4 of the Conditions of Approval with amended pages 3 and 4 o~ September 28, 1990. MIN.IO/1/90 -10- 10/10/90 DRAFT PI.ANNINC, COMMISSION OCTOBER I, ] 990 MIKE BENESH, Beneach Engineering, requested clarification of Condition No. 35. Be questioned if the engineering department was requesting full street improvements at this time. JOHN MIDDLETON stated that they are reguestjng 28' of improvements at this time. MR. BENESH prov.ided the Cornmiss.ion with a opinion from the Attorney General in 1978 regarding the legality of the subd.ivision of one parcel under a track map, which indicated that the other parcels of the track map do not Deed to be included. Assjstant City Attorney JOHN CAVANAUGH stated that the opinion of the Attorney General was not binding and the Commission did DOt. bare to base their action on it. MIKE BENESH stated that under the ordinance they were not reauired to put in concrete curb and gutter improvements; however they would agree to Condition No. 35. COMMISSIONER BI.AIR moved to close the public hearing and adopt the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 25538 add approve Parcel Map No. 25538 subject to the COnditiOnS of Approval as submitted, including the modifications to pages 3 and 4, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD and carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMM I SS] ONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: ] COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 9. STANTIAI, CONFORMANCE NO. P ~ l~.~ · ~elete the Class I bike trail in Planning Area 9 1 Pro d No. of toe ,~orx~uu~ .... :.1~ ~tates, located at Nicholas e ~Z ch~ WIN. 10/1/90 -11- 10/10/90 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, 1990 Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 Prepared by: Deborah Parks Recommendation: Approve Parcel Map, Adopt Negative Declaration Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 was continued from the September 10, 1990 Planning Commission hearing due to insufficient information regarding sewers. A copy of the minutes and previous Staff Report is attached. Staff has researched this issue and has determined that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 should not be required to provide sewer improvements. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 is a Schedule "G" Parcel Map Division. A copy of the requirements for a schedule "G" map is attached. Section D (1) states that: "No sewage disposal collection system is required; however, the land divider may be required to provide the Health Department with a sewage disposal feasibility report in conformance with Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board Standards." A septic system currently exists on Parcel No. I of Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 which received approval by the Health Department and meets the standards of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Southwest Area Plan refers to this type of development as a Category 3 - Rural Residential Development. A copy of the Policies for development of the Category 3 project are attached {Section IV l B) 4). By referring to "adequate soil percolation conditions", Staff interprets this to mean that septic tanks are allowed. A percolation test was conducted and approved for the underlying Parcel Map No. 16705. STAFF R PT\PM25538 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DP:ks Attachments Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 25538 2. APPROVE Parcel Map No. 25538 3. ADOPT Resolution No. 90- based on the analysis and findings combined in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. STAFF R PT\ PM25538 2 c. All urban land uses shall be part of a water district which is authorized to provide water and sewer service. Co~rnitments for water and sewer service must be confirmed by the district responsible for providing service. Adequate and available water and sewer capacity must exist at the time of construction to meet the demands of a proposed project. Dry sewers should be installed if it is anticipated that development beyond the subject development will require such facilities· Amenity features, such as open space and neighborhood parks, shall be provided throughout all urban land uses. Cateqory 3 - Rural Residential Policies Provided that residential development policies and standards are met, density allocations range fro~ 0.5 acre minimum lot size to 5 acre minimum lot size. Development shall not be more intense than the stated ranges of the SWAP land use allocation map. b. Adequate and available water and sewer facilities, water resources availability and, if applicable, sewage treatment plant capacity or adequate soil percolation conditions shall be required to meet the demands of the proposed land use. c. The circulation system serving the proposed land use shall be required to accormnodate the additional traffic generated. d. Water service shall be provided by either a c~nmunity water distribution system or by private wells. Category 4 - Outlying Residential Policies Provided that residential development policies and standards are met, allocations range from S acre minimum lot size to 10 acre minimum lot size· Development shall not be more intense than the stated ranges of the SWAP land use allocation map. The circulation system within the area shall be able to acconnodate the projected increase in traffic from the proposed land use. c. Sewage disposal shall be handled through a septic disposal system. Adequate water facilities, including water resources availability, shall be required to meet the demands of the proposed land use. Commitment for district water service shall be confirmed by the district authorized to provide service, where applicable. 132.15 The water system shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 1,000 GPM for 2 hours ~uration at a minimum of 20 PSI operating pressure from each fire hydrant. This ~nount shall be in addition to the average day demand as defined in the California Achinistrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards). The fire protection sySt~n shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible building material being placed on the job site. In zones that allow multt-fsBtly residential uses, the minimum fire protection shall be as set forth in Ordinance No. 546. D. Sewage Disposal. The minimum requtrsBent for sewage disposal shall be as fol 1 ows: Sewage disposal shall be provided by connection to an existing collection system capable of accepting the waste load, or, if an existing collection systsn is not available, by the development of individual subsurface sewage disposal systems that meet Health Department and the Regional Water Qual i ty Control Board standards and requirements, or, by development of a package treatment plant that meets the Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board standarcLs and requirements. Improvement plans for sewage collection systems shall be reviewed as required by Section 9.3 of this ordinance. Dry sewer may be required as set forth in Section 12.1 when subsurface sewage disposal is approved. E. Fences. I~inimum fencing requirements shall be as follows: Six-foot high chain link galvanized wire fence shall be installed along any canal, drain, expressway or other feature desBed to be hazardous. F. Electrical and Communication Facilities. Minimum requirement for electrical and communication facilities shall be as follows: Electrical and coffnunication facilities shall be installed in conformity with the provisions of Article XIII. SECTION 10.12. SCHEDULE 'G" PARCEL MAP DIVZSION. Any division of land into 4 or less parcels, where any parcel is not less than 18,000 square feet in net area to I acre in gross area, shall be defined as a Schedule 'G" parcel map division. The mintm~ improvements for a Schedule 'G" parcel map division shall be as follows: 67 Streets· The minim~n improvements for streets are established as follows: Arterial Highway - 86 feet in width, designed and constructed in confonnance with Ordinance No. No. 461, Standard No. 100. Arterial (Urban) Highways - 110 feet in width, designed and constructed in conromance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 100 (A). Arterial (Mountain} Highways - 64 feet in width, designed and constructed in confonnance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 100 (B) , Section A. Amaximum width of 40 feet in conromance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 100 (B), Section C maj, be allowed when anticipated low traffic volumes or rugged terrain does not warrant construction of a 64-foot four-lane highway. A minimum width of 52 feet in conformance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 100 (B), Section B may be required in steep terrain to provide for a passing 1 ane. Major Highways - 76 feet in width, designed and constructed in confomance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 101. Secondary Highways - 64 feet in width, designed and constructed in conformance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 102. Collector Streets - 44 feet in width, designed and constructed in conforTnance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 203, Section B. 10. General Local Streets - 40 feet in width, designed and constructed in confonnance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 104, Section B. Short Local or Circulatory Interior Streets - 36 feet in width, designed and constructed in confonnance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 105, Section B. Restricted Local or Noncirculatory Interior Streets - 32 feet in width, designed and constructed in conromance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 106, Section B; provided, however, that in areas with an elevation of 5000 feet or more it shall be 28 feet in width, designed in conformance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 112, Local Mountain Residential Street. Access Road - 32 feet in width, designed mnd constructed in confonnance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 106, Section B. Frontage Roads - designed and constructed in conromance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 107, Section B, 108 or 109. 68 12. 13. 14. 15. Cul-de-sac Streets - shall be designed and constructed in conformance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 800. Alleys - 20 feet in width, designed and constructed in conformance wtth Ordinance No. 451, Standard No. 500. Part-width Streets - shall be one-half of the required tmprovenent, but not less than 28 feet, designed and constr~cted in conformance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 110, Section B. Street N~ne Signs - Type and pl ace~ent shal 1 conform with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 816. Barricades shall be placed at the end of dead-end streets in accordance with Ordinance No. 461, Standard No. 810. Domestic Water· The minimum requirement for a dunestic water supply and distribution syste~ shall be as follows: No water System required· Ifa water system is installed, the requirements shal 1 be as fol 1 ows. Water Supply: water shall be provided to meet the requirements as set forth in the California Ackninistrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards}. Improvement plan review shall be as required by Section 9.3 of this ordinance. b. Piped water systems. If no water system is installed, the following statenent shall be placed on each map sheet of the Enviro~nental Constraints Sheet, in letters not less than 1/4 inch high: NO WATER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED FOR THE LAND DIVISION AS OF THE DATE OF RECORDATION OF THIS HAP. Fire Protection. The minimum improvements for fire protection shall be as fol 1 ows: Fire protection is required when a pjbllc water systen exists within 500 feet right-of-way distance of the boundary of the land division and the water ~rveyor is not prohibited by law fran extending water service to the land. In such cases, fire protection shall be required as approved by the Fire Chief or as follows: Approved fire hydrants shall be located one at each street intersection, and spaced not more than 660 feet apart in any direction· 69 The water systen shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 1,000 GPM for 2 hours duration at a minimum of 20 PSI operating pressure from each fire hydrant. This emount shall be in addition to the average day demand as defined in the California A~inistrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards ). If a clcznestlc water system is installed that ~oes not meet the above mtnim~ requirements for fire protection, m statement must be placed on each map sheet of the record land di vision map in letters not less than 1/4 inch high: THE DOI~ESTIC WATER SYST) PROVIDED FOR THIS LAND DIVIS.'.ON DOES NOT t~EET MINIHUM FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREJ~ENTS. D. Sewage Disposal· The mintm~ tmprov~ents for sewage disposal shall be as fol 1 ows: No sewage disposal collection system is required; however, the land divider may be required to provide the Health Departant with a sewage disposal feasibility report in conformance with Health Depar~ent and Regional Water Quality Control Board Standards. E. Electrical and Communication Facilities. The minimum requirenents for electrical and communication facilities shall be as follows: 1. No electrical and communication facilities are required. If installed, they shall be installed in conformity with the provisions of Article XIII. SECTION 10.13. SCHEDULE "H" PARCEL I~AP DIVISION. Any division of lanc~ into 4 or less parcels, where all parcels are not less than 1 acre in gross area, shall be defined as a Schedule "H" parcel map division. The minimum improvements shall be as follows: A. Streets· The minimum improvements for streets shall be as fol 1 ows: 1. Parcels between 1 acre and less than 5 acres in gross area. If the streets are not to be accepted for maintenance by the County, all streets shall be improved with 24 feet in width of four inch thick base material (minimum R of 60, minimum sand unless ~fftcult topography ~ctates m graded section not less than 18 feet tn ~h. Vertical ~ a~s (0.50% mtnim~ 15% maxim~) and ~rizontal alignant (R-I~ foot minimum) shal( ~ shown on an engineered plan detailing the construction requi ramants for grading and drainage all as rapproved by the Road Con~ntssioner. 7O PLIhlNING COMNISBION NINUTES SEPTEMBER ]0, 1990 GARY THORNBILL stated that the applicant has reaue ed that this item be continued to the next regular' etino of the Planning Commission scheduled for Septe er 17, 1990. COMMISSIONER CNINIAEFF guestioned wheth or not to open the public hearing at this time and c tinue the item to the next meetinQ or to open the pub]'c hearing at the time the item will be brought before · commission. LOIS BOBACK advised th~ Commission open the public hearin~ Temecula, stated that applicant was in the process of re-designin~ the GARY THORNHILL stated that staff had some com is with parking and the applicant is addressing those erns by reducinu the size of the buildings and some loading spaces. COMMISSION] FORD moved to continue Conditional Use Permit No. 2 to e September 17, 1990 Planning Commission meetln~ seconded by CONM]SSIONER HOAGLAND. AYE: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford. Hoagland, Chiniaeff S: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: ] COMMISSIONERS: Fahev A approximately 6:30 P.M. COMMISSIONER FAHEY arrived at the and was no longer absent. 3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25538 3.1 Proposal to subdivide a 1.43 acre parcel on Estero Street into two oarcels. DEBORAH PARKS provided the staff report on this item. She stated that the net proposed size of the parcels are within the one-half acre zoning of R/R. She stated that the project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and would be consistent with the city's forthcoming General Plan. mm. 9/10 / 90 -2- September 12, 1990 PLANNING COMHJSSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 MIKE BENESH, Benesh Engineering, 2899] Front Street, Temecula, representing the applicant. addressed questions from the Comissjon. COMMISSIONER ROAGLAND expressed concern that Rancho California Water District was not listed as an agency required to give written clearance to the developer under Condition No. 19. JOHN MIDDLETON concurred that Rancho California Water Dlstrict should be included in the list of agencies under Condition No. 19. COMMISSIONER FORD stated that under SWAP, he understood there was an ordinance requiring parcels under 2 1/2 acres to be fully improved. Staff stated that county standards indicated that parcel maps can be septic systems but tract maps were to be sewered. Commissioner Ford expressed concern in apDrovino the smaller lot sizes without a preclse determination on the sewer requirements. COMMISSIONER BOAGLAND asked staff about the Resolution that was included as part of the item and it's relatlon to the Recommendation which did not include the Resolution. GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that the Resolution should have been included in the Recommendation. COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND stated that he did not agree with the wordina of the Section 3 Finding, No. 2(a). GARY THORNIt ILL stated that the city attorney's office constructed the Resolution. LOIS BOBACK stated that the Findings are necessary in order to make a Resolution. CONMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY and carried unanimously. AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: B1 ai r, Fahev, Ford, Hoaqland, Chinieaff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None CGeiMISSIONER FORD stated that he would like to see the item continued for clarification of the sewer imorovement requirements. C(]O!ISSIONER CHIRIEAFF and COMMISSIONER BOAGLAND also expressed concern regarding the improvements. aIM. 9/10/90 -3- September 12, 1990 PLANNING C,(X4XISS]ON MINUTES SEPTFJMBER 10, ] 990 COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Tentative Parcel Nap 25538 to the regular meeting of the Planning Con~nission on October 1, 1990, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND and carried unanimously. AYES: 5 CO~L~ISSIONERS: B] a~ r, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chinj aef f NOES: 0 COb~ISSIONERS: None CONDITIONAl, USE PE~J4IT NO. ] 4. Proposed C.U.P for an automobile sales lot and 528 sauare eet of office space. OI.] R MUJICA presented the staff report on th~s item. He sta d that the offlce building is a modular unit on a per ent foundation and the applicant proposes tile roof and stucco walls. He also advised the'Con~issiox~ that the C.U.P. was be3n~ cond~t~oned come back to the ommission every two years, at a maximum part of the approval.~ t i~d °~s \, COMBISS]ONER FAHEY expres~ d concern for the attention to the designated scenic h~ way along this project and how staff was address~no the~'ew from the highway. ~. MUJICA stated that the imp~ments to the modular recreational ~ehicles throughout the ~{ report. Of ApproVal No. 5 should reflect a minimum of 22 par 'ng spaces rather than 20 ~arkinQ spaces as it reads. ~ WIN.9/10/90 -4- September 12, 1990 Case No.: Recommendation: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 10, 1990 Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 Approve Parcel Map, Adopt Negative Declaration APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Robert Paine Benesh Engineering Corporation To subdivide a 1.43 acre parcel into two parcels. 30565 Estero Street, east of Ormsby Road R-R Rural Residential North: R - R South: R - R East: R-R West: R - R Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Single Family North: South: East: West: Single Family Vacant Vacant Vacant STAFF R PT\PM25538 1 ANALYSIS BACKGROUND: The application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 was submitted on November 14, 1989, as a result of the County's review of Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 was reviewed by Riverside County's Land Division Committee on December 14, 1989. The additional information that was requested of the applicant was submitted in April 1990. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 was then scheduled for Director's Hearing on July 9, 1990. However, on June 8, 1990, the file was transferred to the City of Temecula. Area Settinq/Parcel Map Confiquration The underlying Parcel Map No. 16705 subdivided 5.1 acres of land into four parcels, creating Estero Street, Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 16705 is the subject parcel to be subdivided as part of Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538. The gross acreage of Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 is 1.39 acres, The proposed net acreage of Parcels 1 and 2 is 0. 782 and 0.607 respectively. Parcels 1 and 2 meet the half- acre minimum lot size designation of the R-R zone. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 is part of a gentle slope that extends to the south, approximately 1,000 feet, to a dry wash. The adjacent parcels to the north and west are 1.39 and 1.07 acres in size, respectively. An application is currently being reviewed by Staff to subdivide the parcel to the west into two half-acre parcels. West of Ormsby Road is a subdivision of homes where the lot sizes average 0.25 acres. East of the subject site is a 2.75 acre parcel and to the south is a 2.36 acre parcel. Exhibit A illustrates the size of the surrounding parcels. The subject site is currently improved with a single family home which would be located on Parcel 1 of the proposed subdivision. Proposed Parcel 2 is unimproved but has been graded. A future homesite pad exists on Parcel 2 as illustrated on the map. The proposed one-half acre lots will provide an appropriate transition between the existing 0.25 acre lots to the west and the larger one acre plus lots to the east. Approximately one mile east of the subject parcel is STAFF R PT\ PM25538 2 Santiago Estates, a large estate lot project. According to Johnson and Johnson Properties, the developer for Santiago Estates, their project has a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. Santiago Estates is viewed by many as an exclusive development within the City. It should be noted, that although the proposed haft acre parcels are located approximately one mile west of Santiago Estates and function well as a transitional land use between the smaller and larger parcels, this subdivision could set a precedent for landowners located between the subject parcels and Santiago Estates to apply for subdivisions of their land to one-half acre lots. Gradinq The subject site has already been graded according to grading permit No. 538881, issued by the County of Riverside. The grading was necessary to construct the house on Parcel 1. In anticipation of the subject parcel map, the applicant also had a pad on Parcel 2 graded for a future home, as illustrated on the map. At the time of development, grading should be minimal· GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The subject parcel is designated as 1-2 DU/AC according to the Southwest Area Plan. The proposed land division is consistent with this designation, resulting in the potential of 1.4 DU/AC. It is anticipated that the proposed land division, as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's forthcoming General Plan as a transitional land use between the approximate 1.25 acre lots and the larger parcels to the east. An Initial Study has been completed for the project and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposal. FINDINGS: The proposed division is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and Zoning Code in that both parcels exceed the minimum lot size of 0.5 acres and the minimum average lot width of 80 feet. The lot design is logical and meets the approval of the City's Planning and Engineering Departments. STA F F R PT\PM25538 3 The legal owner of record has offered to make all dedications required· The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment· A Negative Declaration is recommended and all impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels through recommended conditions of approval. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City~s General Plan once adopted, based on analysis contained in the Staff Report. The division of land is consistent with the provision of Title 18 of the Subdivision Map Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Plannin9 Department Staff recommends that the Plannin9 Commission recommend to City Council: ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 25538, 2. APPROVAL of Parcel Map No. 25538. based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, DP:ks Attachments: 1. Exhibits 2. Conditions of Approval 3. Initial Study Resolution STAFF R PT\PM25538 4 i lils j cO ~ z ._J :Fc3 il I I / I /, / i I CITY Of TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538 Council Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planning Department The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538, P.C. No. 1, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule G unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Riverside county Subdivision Ordinance 460. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City of Temecula. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City of Temecula. Legal access as required by Ordinance ~60 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a City maintained road· STAFFRPT\PM25538 1 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 12-26-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivide shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's Transmittal dated 12-8-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 12-13-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated 12-13-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated 12-20-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated 5-1-90, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated 12-11-89, a copy of which is attached. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall be required to pay applicable Quimby fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance 460. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department· STAFFRPT\PM25538 2 It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 17. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL: 18. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality; Rancho California Water District; Riverside County Flood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; and CATV Franchise. 19. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. 20. Dedication shall be made to provide for right-of-way for a cul-de-sac per Riverside County Standard No. 800. 21. The subdivider shall construct or post security 9uaranteein9 the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. ae Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and striping. b. A domestic water system. 22. The subdivider shall provide bonds and agreement, clearances from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of the final map. 23. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. 24. 25. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for a traffic signal impact. ST A FF R PT\PM25538 3 26. 27. 29. 30. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities within the right-d-way. 31. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property line. 32. All driveways shall be constructed along all public street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). 33. A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent. 34. The required improvements as reflected in the following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. The improvements are required based on the following findings: The improvements are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area. b. The improvements are necessary for the public health and safety. 35. Estero Street shall be improved with 28 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section B. ( 36-60), add concrete curb/gutter. 36. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. STAFFRPT\PM25538 4 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 37. Construct full street improvements includin9 but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights within parcel map boundary in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 800-cul-de-sac. 38. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 39. Asphaltic emulsion (fo9 seal) shall be applied not less than 14 days followin9 placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. 40. Prior to Build(n9 Permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. 41. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. STAFF R PT\PM25538 5 OFF~uE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY ,~URVEYOR l.~Roy D. Smool ROAD CC~4HISSIONER & COCrNTY SURVEYOR December 26, 1989 COUNTY ADM~tSTRAT/V[ C'LNTT..R HAIUNG P.O. BOX IO90 RrVERS'ID[. C,A/.JrOR. NIA 92502 (714) 187-6554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 REI PM 25538" Schedule G - Team i - SMD #9 AP #111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Con~nissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e. concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The pro~ection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Co~nissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER * 4080 LEMON STREET · RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 PM .25538 December 26, 1989 Page 2 10. 11. 12. The required improvements as reflected in the following conditions shall be completed or a Performance Security in lieu thereof shall be posted in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance 460, Article XV, prior to recordation of the final map. The improvements are required based on the following findings= a) The improvements are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area. b) The improvements and safety. are necessary for the public health Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Estero Street shall be improved with 28 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 40 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section B. (18'/30') Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the the developer/owner shall submit a detailed soils investi- gation report addressing the construction requirements within the road right of way. A standard cul-de-sac shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461. The minimum lot frontages along the knuckles shall be 35 feet. cul-de-sacs and PM 25538 Dece~nber 26, 1989 Page 3 13. 14. 15. 15a. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient public offsite rights of way to provide for a primary access road to a paved and maintained road. Said access road shall be constructed in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and alignment approved by the Road Commissioner. Said offsite access road shall be the westerly extension of Estero Street to Ormsby Road, then southerly on Ormsby Road to Santiago Road. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with PM 96/39-40, PM 97/11-12, PM 115/71-72, PM 81/83-84 and Tentative PM 24633. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall comply with Road Department standards and require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street improvement plans and shall depict onl~ such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed within the public road rights-of-way. PM ?5538 Dece~,,ber 26, 1989 Page 4 21. EB: Jw Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said Section. Very truly yours, ENVIROI~NENTAL IIEALTtl SERVICES DIVISION 6 UNIVERSITY AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CA 9250] DATE: wATER SOURCE:/?L:/-u. D.. PARENT P.M, (IF ANY) SCItEL)ULE //1/ HAIVER REQUEST?.,4.,~'2 THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTI! tlAS liEVIEWED TliE MAP DESCRIBED ABOVE. ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS TRANSr4]TTAL, CONTACT {7ILl) 787-65q], RECOMMENDATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: ; AREA/D 1 STR ! CT girD. IIGJJ IF IIIEItE ARE OUR 'he Environmental Healtit Services Division C'gtlSD) has reviewed the above Parcel ap and while we are not privileged to receive any preZtmlnary in[ormacion relative o subsur[ace sewage disposal or connection t~ sewers or domestic rarer supply, it s our considered optnlon titat the soils that might be encountered in thls area ~y noc be conducive to e~[ect~ve subsur{ace sewage disposal systems rind becnune ~ soil characteristics in the area, there may be a requirement [or extensive :ading, rompaction, cutting, etc. Pr~Lor to recordsCion o[ the {ins1 map, an :cepCable so~s {easibiZity report slTilI'~ '~b~ed ..... ~ "'it~)pproval f~ )R DEPUTY D i RECTOR OF -:ALTH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL :ALTII SAN 117 (REV. 1U/89) ( s GUA iDlE) {~'~ILE) , KENNETH L EDWARDS CHIEF ENGINEER 1995 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. _[_ P1 anner 1');.~ We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." This project is in the rv~fr~ Cre~k/'l'e~c~ V~I~ ADP Area drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance wit the a~l r~l and h icable es regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of will be con n accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. ~ry ~ul~y~, DATE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF PLANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405 INDIO, CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12-13-89 ATTN: RE: DIANE KIRKSEY PARCEL M_A,P 25538 ' PLANNING & ENGINEERING 3760 IZTH STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 (714) 787-6606 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "G" fire protection. An approved standard fire hydrant (6"x4"x2~") shall be located so that no portion of the frontage of any lot is more than 330 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. The applicant/developer shall provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrants are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Michael g. Gray, Deputy Fire Depar~man~ Planner Administrative Center, 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 December 20, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: D. Kirksey County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Parcel Map 25538f Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and SaFeLy has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Fireplaces may encroach l' into required minimum 5' side yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Robert L'inares "' Senior Land Use Technician Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT GRADING SECTION ~-. TO: PLANNING / D~J, IRKSEY DATE: May 1, 1990 RE: PM 25538 ~ ,' APN: 945-070-010 The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are included. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. All grading shall conform to the 457. Uniform Building Code and Ordinance Provide verification that any existing grading was permitted and that approval to construct was obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' in vertical height with grass or ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284-47. GFading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security to be posted with the Building and Safety department. All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100 year storm flows. NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, and 284-46. These forms are available at all Building and Safety Offices. Ihank .you. CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY II Backqround 1. Name of Proponent: Robert Paine Address and Phone Ntunber of Proponent: 6563 Via Aboles Anaheim Hills, California 92807 Date of Environmental Assessment: (213) 430-0316 June 28, 1990 4. Agency Requiring Assessment: CITY OF TEHECULA Name of Proposal, if applicable: ~ocation of Proposal: Environmental Impacts Parcel Map # 25538 Southeast corner of the intersec- tion of Ormsley Road and Estero Street. (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth· Will the proposal result in: as Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X be Disruptions, displacements, compac- t(on or overcovering of the soil? X Ce ee Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Y BLANKIES/FORMS -1- Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltatlon, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: ae Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Ce Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? be Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Yes X Maybe No X X B LA N K I ES/FORMS -2- Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants ) ? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Ce Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life· Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals I birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes. No B LA N K I ES/FORMS -3- 10. 11. 12. 13. Noise· Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare· Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources· Will the proposal result in: Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? be Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: A risk of an expiosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes Maybe No X X X BLANKIES/FORMS -~' Yes Maybe No Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, b/cyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? de Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 16. ae Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X ..×j X BLANKIES/FORMS -5- 17. 18. 19. b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ae Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard J excluding mental health )? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? CO Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes Maybe X No X BLANK I ES/FORMS -6- Yes M.a, ybe No 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. ae Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? { A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief. definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? I A projectis impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant· ) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X BLANKIES/FORMS -7- Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation B LA N K I ES/FOR MS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date For CITY OF TEMECULA BLANKIES/FORMS -9- RIVERSIDE COUNTY "~//'c72f-& ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMk'NT FORM: b'rANDARD EVALUATION ENVIRONEENTAL A..~E..~MENT (E.A.) NUMBER: ~ t.-/~ O.~ MODULE I'~3MBER(s): /I ~_ PRO3ECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s): G)/%~ p_ 5' 5' ...~.,~ NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: I. !siO.l['~ I1NIIq}RMATION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (include propoud uses and minimum lot siz~ ss applicable): FO rc~ L,~.~ ,~ 0, ~ o------/.._ c"'), tb' t/c,-- c-.~-.- Io4- s. / he4' Other: D. ASSZSSOR'S PARCZL NO.(s):_c~ .'1 ~' ' 3 9 ~ - B. TYPE OF PROJECT: SITE SPECIFIC ; COUNTYIVDE ; COMMUNITY ; POLICY Two or more of the above may appl),. A Sne'iT'lpeci~c Projecl invo~fewer than 1000 property owners in a definable area and results in s chart e in ensting land uses, yonin , open spat,- designations or Community Plan land use designations. If Site S~ Projecl was checked fill out tie reminder of thLS page. If Site S ' c Projecl was not ckecked and the project covers a defined area, fill in only Items C 'Toni Project Area' and ~locw. C TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ]. L/~ ; or SQUARE FEET .... rd, "' '''" '° "' Residential: Acres ! % Lots nlS n~P~°rma u°n Commercial: Acres Lots '_Square ~ Building Area ProiecT~'~. of Employees __ Industrial: Acres Lots Square Feet of Building Area Proj¢clea No. of Employees F. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCItlFTION OR ATTACH A IIOAL DF. SCRIYrlON: BRIEF DESCRIFrlON OF THE EXLfTING ENVIRONMEWrAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS: This Pa must only be complete~ for propoSa___ls that qualify m Site S~c Projects. The information on this page is not r_equire~fJr projects which are nol Site Specifi~ however, completion of applicable portions of this section is encouraged. For Items A throu h I, state the policies associated with each item which are applicable to the project. If you require more space use Section A. OPeN SPAC~ AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s) (Not applicable in ~): B. LAND USE PLANNING AREA: ""' C. SLrBAREA, IF ANY: D. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY: E. COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY: E COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY: I O. REMAP ADVISORY DESIONATION(s), IF ANY: *"" PL ADOPTED SPECIFIC PLAN, IF ANY: """ I SP~-ClPIC PLAN DESIONATION(s), IF ANY: -"' a. EXISTING ZONING: L ADJACB3',fT ZONING: /~" ~ K. PROPOSED ZONING, IF ANY: If the rllpon.~ to Items M, N, O, R, S, or T is 'No' or 'Conditionally", disam the items receiving these re~pon.~. M. Is IJ~ proporal] consistent with the sJte's existing or propot~ zoning (Doe~ not apply to zone change proposals)? N. ]s tl~ prol~tal compatible with ~nistinf,, surroundins wnin$? O. If the prolxxal is implementing · spedtic plan, is it consistent with the specific plan's dlliZnations? Baltd on existing conditions, what land use category(ill), ~ Category(ill) or Open Space Designation(s) be~t describe the site? If polsible, indicate subcategorill such as rllidcntial, co~;ra_.al, etc. O. in order for the proposal project to be approval, for what land use category(ill), I~M. AP category(its) or Communit:,. Plan Policy(ill) would the site have to qualify? ~.~'~,%~. ~ - ~..~,~- .j,.. ~-~A~-e-,,-J~ ,,-/ l~ Will the i~d u.~ catel~ry(lll). ~ catelory(ill) or Commu-lt~ Pla~ Policy(ill) rcquize~l to approv= the proposa: be met on the site through conditions of approval applied at the development stage? ~e · S. is the proposal compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses? T. la tl~ proposal consistrest with the land use designations and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan? indicate sup .~rti~ documentation including data sou.rc~ · encies consulted, findings of fact, mitiXauon measures an~l reJa~4~ monitoring requiremenu under SectlongS. Discu~ the sign~cancc of issues markeel yes (Y) in Seaion V. IAND USE W the pmpordl malt in · SU~tULtal alteration of the present or planned land me of an arM? is the proposal affected by a cit7 spherc of influence and/or adjacent to a city or county boundary7 PUBLIC FACIIJ'XX~ AND SERVICES CTRCUI AllON =_S_ Will the proposal malt in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effccu on existing paricing facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon exiting u'snsponstion systems? d. Alteration to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or pods? Alteration to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Incrcasc in traffic hazards to motor vebjcies, bicy~lists, pedestrian (or equestrian) traffic? An effect upon, or s n~d for ncw or altered maintenance of roads? t h. An effect upon circulation during the projcct's comtructlon? 3. ._~ Bik~ Trstis (Fig. IV.12 - IV.D) WATI~ 4. .k Water (Fig. IV.14 * IV.I~ & Agency Letters) Wfil the proposal result in: a. ___ Ts nsd for new syuen~ or sourca pradslon s)stems? b. __.. P-le~Jon of water lines through an undeveloped area? c. . The need for the ka"mation of a Sewer (Fig. IV. 14 - IV. 15 & Agency Letten) Will the proposal result in: a. The nccd for new sy~tcrr~, or sabstantial alteration to cxi~tinX sewer and septic tank s~tcms? ~nension of sewer Lines through an undeveloped area? The n_,~-d for installation of a dr)' sewer system as rdnitary sewen are not immediately available? PUBLIC SERVICES FI~ Services (Fi& IV.16- IV. 18) Will the proposal have an effcc~ upon, or result in a need for new altered fire protection servic, c~? Sheriff Services (Fig IV. 17 - IV. 18) .._.. Wfil the proposal have an effcc~ upon, or result in a need for new at altered sheriff protection Schools (Fig. IV.17- IV. 18) Will the proposal have an effcc, upon, or mult in · ne-_d for new oz Solid Waste (Fig. IV.17 - I~.18) a, Will the pwposal result in · need fo~ new systems, or substantial alteratior of solid rote generation and disposa b.__ Is the pwposal inconsistent wjtt CIWMP (County integrated Wastt Management Plan)? ITI. Eh'VIR O~~ ~ ~ (Contimsed) PUILIC FA~ AND SERVICES (Continued) iz~-ClzP-s. TION 12. I Parks and Recreation (Fig. IV.19 - IV.2G, C)rd. No. 460, [~ction 10.33, Oral. No. 639) a. Will the proposal have an efteat upon, or result In a need for new or altered parks or other recreational hctlities? b._ ~ the proposal mult In an liftpact upon the quati~ or quantit~ of mtins recreational opportunities? c..__. h the proposal located withtn a CSA or recreation and park district with a Communi~ Parb and l~creation 13...~ Plan (C)uimby f~)? Recreational Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV.2,i, Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Mal~, Oizn Spaee and Coxscrvation Map for Western County tratl atignmcnu). Utilities (Fig. IV.2S * IV.26) Will the propoul result in a n~a for new sy~tcma, or su~tantial altcra~ion of the foBowing utilities: b. Natural gas? c. Communications systems? d. Storm water drainage? e. ,. Street fighting? IZ ..=__ Other MISCELt ANEOUS lS._~ ktrporu (Fig. IL18.2 - II. 18.4, II. 18.8- II.18. I0 & IV.27 - IV.36) Will the proposal: a. Result In an inconsistency with an Airport Master Plan? b. . Require review by the Airport Land U~ Commission? 16. Other HOUSING Housing a. Will he the proposal ~ffect existing housing? Will the proposal create a demand for additional housing, particularly housing affordable to households gaming 80~ or less of the Counts malian income? Will the proposal alter the location distribution, dcnqty or Krowth rate o the human population of an area? ls the proposal within a Coun~ Redcvclopmcnt Projca Area? HI. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSESSMENT f~aed) CFH Zones NA PS U R 0=~ VI.3) NA ~ 1~ U g ('Fig. VI.4) 2o. Gro.. 4s -H,S Zone V l) B, NA S PS U R ('Fig, VI~) 21. X $1opes (Riv. Co. 8130 Scale Slope Maps) Wfil the propad3 result in: s._ ChaSe in topography or ground sgrb~ relief features? b._ Cut or fill slope Fcatcr than 2.:1 or higher than 10 f~t? c.__ GradLag dat affects or negates $ubsu~ace sewage disposal systems? 22.._~ landslide Rbk (Riv, Co, SiX) Scale Seismic !claps or On-site laslzction) NA S PS U R ('Fig. VI.6) Will the proposal result in: a.__ Unstable firth conditions or in chazages in geologic substructures? b. EtTosure of people or property to possible slope failure or rockfall hsnrCiS? :7.3. ~ SOUS Ct..T.S.D.A. Soil Conservation SeP,,icc Soil Surveys) Wffi the proposal result in: a.__ Disruptions, displacements, compaction or ovei~.~,cfing of the soft? b. ErJx3surc of struaures to shrink/swell son conditions? EARTH fConfinued) 24..~ F, rmlon (U.S.D.A. Soft Conservation Service Soil Survey) Wm the proposal result in: a._ Changes in deposition, silLation or en3sion which may mcxiify the channel of a river or stream or the b~l of a lake? b. ___, Any increa~ in water erosion either on or off site? 25. N WInd Erosion & Blowsand from project either mm' off sit~ ('Fig. VI, 1 - ~ Ord. 4~, Sec 14.2 ,~ Oral. 484) :26. N Ground Subsidence 27. N Uniqut Ftaturu Wii~ the proposal result in: 28.__ Other Destruction, covenng or mo<li~cation of any unique geologic or physical futures? FLOOD 29. t~ 30./~ Will the b.___ d.__,, Dam Inundation Arta (Fig. VLT) Fkmdplalns (Fig, VI.7) NA U R (Fig. VI.8) proposal result in: Alteration to the c~ur~ or flow of flood waters7 Changes in coune or direction of water movemenu? Changm in absorption rate~ or the rate and mount of surface runoffT. Exposure of people or property to water re,,!at~d hazar~ such as flooding? NA - Not Applicable Critical F..ssential Normal-High Risk C__~rmal-Low Risk Definitions for Land Use Suitability brings Where imiimted sbov~, circ~ the approprint~ Land Use Suitability hang(s). NA - Not Ilcable - C,,~n~d~, Suitable - Provtsio~al Suitabk - OeneraHy. ~uitable IlL ENVIRO~A.L ~ ~ ~'NONMENTA~ m, ZA~DS 31,~/AL-'port Noise (Fig, IL18~, II.18.11 & VI.12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.) NA A B C D (Iqg. VLll) NA A B C D (FIB. VI.11) 33...~ Highway Nobe ('Fig. VL17* VL29) NA A B C D (FIg. VL11) ~ A B C D (Fig. VL11) Norm Effects mar ~ ta, PmJm (F~ VLn) a. ,__. Will the proposal ruttit in inae. m~ in existing nols~ levels? b. Will the proposal rmult in the czlx~ure of people to severe noise AIR OUAI.ITY WATER OUAY-1TY Air Quall~ Impam Will the proposal result in: a. ,. Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quails3,? b. _.._ Creation of objectionable odors? c... Ahcration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. ~ Exlx~ure of land uses uso4:~ted with sensitive rcecptors wlzich arc located withi,~ I mile of · project site to project point source emissions? e.._=_ The construction of a sensitive rcccptor located within one mile of an existing point source emitter? 37. J~J Water Quall~ Impam Will the proporal result in: a. Discharge into surface waterS* or any alteration of surface water quali~, including but not limitca to temperature, ai.uol~ oxygen, or turbldity? Substantial r~uction in the amount of water otherwise available to the pubtic? Pcrcolation of waste materials or contaminanu into groundwater re·nurses, including but not limitca to nitrates, petroleum based contaminanu? Exposure of a project sensitive to water quality to unhcalthful water supplies? RAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS 3& ~ Does the proposal involve a risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including but not timited to: oil, pesticicles, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? 39.._~_ Does the proposal involve possible interference with an emergency response plax~ or an emergency evacuation plan? 40...~ Will the proposal result in the creation of an) health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? 41. ~ Will the proposal result in the crposurc ol people to potential health hazarcis? Bantalons Fire Area (Fig. V1.30 - V1_31 ) MS. Painmar (Ord. No. 6~5) Other l~htinS Issues Will the proposal result in: a. ___ Production of new ligiat or glare? b..~_ Fr, zp~ure of residential proper~ K umczzptable light levels? 42. N Definitions for Noise Acceptability Ratings Where indiested sbo~ ~ the appropriate Noise A_,',"~_,ptability Rating(s). AGRICY, rl .'rU'R~. 47./~ Agriculture CFi& VL34 - Yl.3~) Will the proposal malt Rmtuction in acreage of any agricultural crop or prime farmland? b. _.._. Conv~nion of farmland within, or adjacent to, an aFicultural pre~n~ (Rlv. Co. Agricultural Land Conservation Contraa Maps)? c _.__ Dm, clopmen t of non-agricultural ~ witlain 300 fe~t ofa~rtc~!turally zoned proper~. Wildlife Will the a. Y (Fig. VL36- VL37) proposal result in: tmpacu on an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan? Change in the divenit~ of species, or overall number of any slzciea of animaL~ (bird, land mammaB, reptiles, rnh, and invertebrates including in~ect~ and aquatic Reduction of the humben of any unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of animaL? Introduction of new species of anj. mals into an area, or a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? D~terioration of ,'-~ting ~h or wildlife habitat? VEGI~TATION 49. ~, Vegetation (Fig. VI.38 - VI.,t0) Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or overall number of any species of plant (including trces, shrubs, gra~, and squatic plants)? b. Reduction in the humben of any unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of planu? c, Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of cxBting d. Reduction in the numbers of any planl species which arc integral to the life cycle of any sensitive animal MINERAL RESOURCF_.S 50. ~ Mineral Will the a. ~mm m Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI.42) proposal result in Prcclusion of use of all or part of a State classified or designated M'KZ-2 zone resource? Incompatible land uses being located adjacent to a State classified or designated MRZ-2 zone area or existing surface mine? Exposure of people or property to hazards trom proposed, existing or abandoned quarries or mines? L~TERGY RESOURCF~ Sl./'~! Eriefly Resources (Fig. VL43- VI..) Wm the proposal muir in: a. ___ Use of substantial mounts of fuel or gn~rJy? b. __.= Substantial in~m'.ase in demand upon aisting sources of ener~, or require the development of new sources of c. __=. Preclttrdon of the use of a resource for alternati~ ~nerfy (solar, wind, regeneration. geothermal, or bioma~ and waste-to-enuD) projects? lrl. ENVIRONMiNTAL LqSUES ,,,S~E:~SMENT {'Cootinned) ENYI O AL RESOURCES (Continued) WATER RESOURCES 52. H Warm' Rmoure~ Wm the pOumropoal result in: ge in th~ mount of surface water in any water body (including fresh wary markhes, v~rnsl pooh, oa:a. tcnajas, blueLine streams, seeps and spttup)? Alw. ntion of the air=tlon or ate of flow of ground waters? Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct sdditlons or withdrawats, or through interception of an aquifer by c~ts or nnvations? Alteration, dredging or fitling of we, ands (including fresh water blueline streams, seeps and sprinlp)7 SCI:~'IC RESOURC~'-~ ~3...~ Scenic Resources a.__ Is the proposal within a scenic highway corridor? ('Fig. VI.45) b.__ Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any prominent scenic vista or view open to the public, or result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? I-flSTORIC I~-gOU~CF-q .54. ~ Ittstoric Resources Gig- VL32 - VI.33 & vl.4s) Will the proposal rmult in: Alteration or destruction of an historic site? Adverg physical or amthetic effects to an I~toric building, structure or object? ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCF. S 55. N Archaeological Resourcts ('Fig. VL32 - VI.33 & VI.,i6 - V1.48) Will the proposal result in: a.__ Alteration or destruction of s prehistoric resource site7 b. Adverg physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric building, structure or object? c. A physical change which would affea umque ethnic ~mlturai values? d. __, Adverg physical or aesthetic effects to · burial site? e.,__ Restriction of hisring religious or sacred uses within the potential hnpaa area? PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES .56, ~/Psleontological Resources Resources Map) RESOURCE USE CPalcontologicaI 57. ~/ Will the proposal result in · sut' ~tial depletion of any non-rcncwab!~ aral 58. hi resource? Will the proposal alter the rz: of any natural resource? OTHER 59.'__, Other 60.--~-~ Other ENVIRONMXINT~ ~ ASSESSMEN"r 61. MANDATORY Yi2N'DtNGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to degrade the quali~ of the environment, lubsttntlal~ reduce the habitat of · fish or wildlife species, cause · fish or wildlife population to drop below self su~h~g ~ threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of · rare,, threatened or endangered plant or animal or efimjnate important enmples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, w the disadvantage of long-term, envifonmcnul pals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacu wfil cndurc well into the future,) Does the project have impact~ whim are · =tndiv~dually lixnitcd, but cumulativcly considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the cffca of the wtal of those impacts on the environment is significant) 64.__ Does the projea have environmental effects which will cause substantial advcne effecu on human beings, e. ither directly or indirectly? IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACt DETERMINATION: I find ~ propmeal project will not have a signl~nt effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration will r pepar (or) i~corporat~d into th~ pw.}_,x'~__ A Negative ~tion will be prcparcd. (or) O a significant eftcot on the environment and an Environmental Impaa Repor Date: V. INFORMATION ~OURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT, Mr/'/GATION ~ AND MONTTOEING BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE ISSUI: NO. INFORMATION R~OUTR.~D DATE DATE ADEQUACY INFORMATION INFORMATION FINDINO R~.OUF-~I'~D R~.C~rV'~D (YES/NO. DATE~ For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections IILB, identif), the issue number and do the following, in the format as State s ' c mitigation measures and monitoring requirements, If idcntirublc without requiring ~'ltddJtfolxal sheets are needed to complete this section, chr, ck the box at the end of the section and attach the neceuary sheets, ISSU'~-NO. SOLrR. C:F,,S, AO~NCIES CONSUI..TF..D, RNDINOS OF FACT, MITIOATION lvI"FAS1..~"R~-~ AND MON1T'OR, fNG R.l=Ot..frRfrMl=lNrl~ V. INI~PJ~t4TION l~Lm NO. JZY',~ /2 Myr~OURCES AGEN~CI~_~ CONSULTED FINDINGS OF FACT OATION ~f~,~UR. -, AND MONIT~RINO REOUIREMEttqTS: ~m~ F/ND/NGS OF FACT, Mll'/GATION ~ AND MONI'FO~G l~Ul= NO. V /CY?/ ~/ /~: //~ .7Tr t~ s~ '; t', - 2e,,3,, / '~ ' I/. ;-7 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 25538 TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.43 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS AT 30555 ESTERO STREET. WHEREAS, Robert Paine filed Parcel Map No. 25538 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on September 10, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findincls. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. 12) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: Ja) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFR PT\TPM25538 1 Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: [1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. [ 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Parcel Map No. 25538 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 6.5, no Parcel Map may be approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any Parcel Map approved shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. STAFFR PT\TPM25538 2 proposed is community. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Parcel Map No. 25538 for the subdivision of a 1.43 acre parcel into two parcels located at 30565 Estero Street subject to the followin9 conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoin9 Resolution was duly adopted by the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meetin9 thereof, held on the 10th day of September, 1990 by the followin9 vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFF R PT\PM25538 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Parcel Map No. 25538. DA?'D: By Name Title STAFFRPT\TPM25538 4 ITEM NO. 6 APPR.OVAL CiTY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER /~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: C)TY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City CounciliCiLy Manager P)anning Department October 16, 1990 Variance No. 2 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Scott Wright Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: Bedford Properties Bedford Properties The applicant requests a variance from the requirements of Ordinance 348 Section 19.4 {a.4) in order to allow five free-standing signs at a ~J~ acre shopping center. The southwesterly corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road adjacent to 1-15. C-P-S, Scenic Highway Commercial North: South: East: West: C-P-S - Scenic Highway Commercial M-M - Manufacturing Medium A-2-20 - Heavy Agriculture 1-15 Not requested. Vacant, shopping center under construction. STAFFRPT\VAR2 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: DISCUSSION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: North: Commercial South: Manufacturing East: Vacant West: 1-15 Number of Acres: Number of Businesses: Number of Proposed Free-standin9 Signs: 27 At a duly advertised public hearin9 on October 1, 1990, the Plannin9 Commission approved Variance No. 2 by a vote of The following was added to Condition of Approval No. 3 by the Plannin9 Commission: "The freeway sign adjacent to 1-15 shall have a maximum of two tenant si9ns per side, and all other free-standin9 signs shall have a maximum of four tenant signs per side." Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Variance No. 2 based on the findings in the attached Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval as amended at the Planning Commisssion hearing of October 1, 1990. SW: ks STAFFRPT\VAR2 2 DRAFT PI,AN Ng COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER ZI, o not want them done at this time; No. 59, he a ~ the C m.~ssion if they bad a time frame for the fi r. on the 4737 "C" l,a Paz, Temecu] that. she is one of he 146 homeowners adjacent this project and feels that ey ~hou]d not bare to ] 're next. to a gas ARKHAW sta d that the and representatives have met wi he Homeo~ner's Board on presented the Planning Department with a draf ~er from them giving their approval of the pro~e¢ COMMISSIONER FORD to the Negative Declaration and not adopt t Reso]ution )vjng Conditional Use Permit No. 4 directed staff re-submit to the Commi ssi on./~.i t.b appropri ate ) andsca' p] ans, assessment distric plans, determination on the h rs of operation, AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: B] ai r, For NOES: ]. COMMISSIONERS: Fahey ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hoag]and 4. VARIANCE NO. 2 4.] Reouest for a variance from the requirements of Ordinance 348. Section 19.4 (a.4) in order to obtain approval of a sign program inc]uding five free standing signs for a 44 acre shopping center located at the south westerly corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Roads. SCOTT WRIGHT provided the staff report on this item. He stated that the proposed Signs were sma]]er than the maximum size allowed and that the applicant had provided substania] landscaping for the areas around the signs. He added that the freeway signs would have a maximum of W~..lo/itgo -5- lo/io/9o PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DRAFT OCTOBER ], 3990 two tenants named and the other signs would have a maximum of four tenants named. COMMISSIONER BLAIR questioned that diagrams provided in the a(]enda packages jnd.~cated eight to ten Dames s]ots on the signs. GRF. G ERICKSON, Bedford Properties, stated that they would agree to condition the signs to two and four tenants. COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to adopt Reso]utdon 90-~ aDproving Variance No. 2: and approve Variance No. 2 based on the attached Conditions of Approval and added Condition No. 5 stipulating a maximum of two names on the freeway signs and four names on the other signs, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD and carried as follows: AYF.S: 4 COMM] SS] ONKRS: B1 aj r, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: ] COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland RECESS COMMISSIONER CHIN]AEFF dec]ared a five minute recess at 7:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:50 P.M. 5. PLOT PI,AN NO. 336PP 5.3 oposa] tO construct 5 jndustr~a] buj]djn 7 -36,000 sQ .e feet each) at the 27800 block o laz Road. STEVE JO OE provided the st report on th~s project. JOHN MIDDI.ETON a 'se he Commission that Condition No. 36 and Condition had been revised per the memorandum of 1990. STEVE HE c., expressed conc e requested c stated 10/1/90 -6- 10/10/90 ATTACHMENT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VARIANCE NO. 2 Council Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department The applicant shall submit a Plot Plan application for approval of the sign program. individual signs shall require approval of a plot Plan application and issuance of a buildin9 permit. The appearance and location of the free-standin9 signs shall conform substantially with that shown in Exhibits 2, 3 and L~. The freeway sign adjacent to i-15 shall have a maximum of two tenant signs per side, and all other free-standing signs shall have a maximum of four tenant signs per side. lAinended October 1, 1990 by Planning Commission) This approval shall be used within one year of the approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void, and a new application will be required· STAFFRPT\VAR2 1 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1,1990 Case No.: Variance No. 2 Prepared By: Scott Wright Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: Bedford Properties Bedford Properties The applicant requests a variance from the requirements of Ordinance 348 Section 19.4 (a.4) in order to allow five free-standing signs at a L~4 acre shopping center. The southwesterly corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road adjacent to 1-15. C-P-S, Scenic Highway Commercial North: South: East: West: C-P-S - Scenic Highway Commercial M-M - Manufacturing Medium A-2-20 - Heavy Agriculture 1-15 Not requested. Vacant, shopping center under construction. North: Commercial South: Manufacturing East: Vacant West: I - 15 Number of Acres: Number of Businesses: Number of Proposed Free-standing Signs: 27 5 STAFFRPT\VAR2 1 BACKGROUND: Plot Plan No. 38, the proposed sign program for the Palm Plaza shopping center at the southwesterly corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, was submitted on May 18, 1990. The Planning Department notified the applicant in a letter dated ,~lay 31, 1990 that the proposed sign program did not comply with the provisions of Ordinance 348 regarding the permitted number of free-standing signs and the permitted face area of wall signs. The applicant responded on June 8, 1990, that due to the size of the site, Palm Plaza should be considered as multiple shopping centers on eight parcels. At this time the applicant deleted one of the two freeway signs and two tenant pylon signs which had been included in the original proposal. The Planning Department did not concur with the applicant's interpretation regarding the number of "shopping centers" in Palm Plaza, and Plot Plan No. 38 was denied on June 19, 1990. The applicant filed an appeal to the Planning Commission on June 29, 1990 within the 10 day appeal period. The appeal included a revised sign program which corrected the portion of the wall sign criteria which did not comply with Ordinance No. 348. Appeal No. 6 was scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of August 6, 1990. Staff recommended denial based on the number of free- standin9 signs. The applicant requested a continuance to August 20, 1990. On August 10, 1990 the applicant met with the Director of Planning and the case planner. At that meeting staff determined that a variance would be the most appropriate vehicle for the applicant to use in pursuit of the proposed sign program. Variance No. 2 was submitted on August 15, 1990. At the Planning Commission meeting of August 20, 1990, the City Attorney expressed concerns that the required findings for a variance could not be made. The applicant requested a continuance to the Planning Commission meeting of September 10, 1990. Subsequently the City Attorney determined that the required variance findings may be made in this case. A memo was distributed to the Planning Commission stating that Variance No. 2 would be scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of October 1, 1990. STAFFRPT\VAR2 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: The proposed sign program includes one free- standing sign 36'7" in height adjacent to 1-15, one free-standing sign 12' in height adjacent to Winchester Road, one free-standing sign 16'8'' in height at the main site entrance on Ynez Road, and two free standing signs 12~ in height at the other two driveways on Ynez Road. (See Exhibit B, proposed sign locations). The sign program also contains criteria for wall mounted signs which comply with the standards of Ordinance 348 and are not at issue in this variance. Maximum Number of Free-Standinq Siqns Allowed Section 19.4 (a.4) permits a shopping center with more than one street frontage to have two free- standing signs provided that they are not located on the same street, are at least 100 feet apart, and the second sign does not exceed 100 square feet in surface area and 20 feet in height. Section 19.2(m) of Ordinance 348 defines a shopping center as a parcel of )and not less than three acres in size on which there are four or more separate businesses that have mutual parking facilities. The definition does not include a maximum area or number of separate businesses. Therefore, if the ordinance is interpreted strictly, the proposed sign program is not in compliance with Section 19.4(a.4) in that it includes a total of five free-standing signs. Heiqht of Free-Standinq Siqns Section 19.4 (a.1,2) of Ordinance 348 stipulates a maximum height of 45 feet for signs within 660 feet of the freeway right of way and 20 feet for other locations. The proposed sign program complies with the height restrictions. All proposed free-standing signs are less than the maximum allowed height. Size and Location of Site Palm Plaza encompasses 44 acres and abuts a freeway, 1-15, and a highway, Winchester Road (State Route 79). The site has 1,300 feet of frontage on Ynez Road. To provide adequate site access and to facilitate internal traffic circulation on the 44 acre site, there will be three driveways on Ynez Road. STAFFRPT\VAR2 3 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Number of Free-Standinq Siqns at other Shoppinq Center A survey of other shopping centers in the City shows that there are nine free-standing signs at Rancho California Town Center, four center signs and several other free-standing tenant signs at Tower Plaza, five free-standing signs at Old Adobe Plaza, six at Winchester Square, and five at Rancho Temecula Center. Visual Impact of Proposed Siqns All five proposed signs are monolith shaped monument signs with the name and logo of the center at the top and articulated sections which will contain the names of no more than four anchor or major tenants. All five signs are shorter than the maximum allowed height. Each sign will feature substantial landscape planting around the base to enhance the overall appearance of the sign (See Exhibit 3, Typical Sign Elevation, and Exhibit 4, Typical Landscape Planting Treatment). Face Area of Free-Standinq Siqns The program complies with the maximum face areas of 150 square feet for freeway signs and 50 square feet for other free-standing signs per Section 19.4{a.1.2), 1-15 is an eligible State Scenic Highway. General Land Use Policy 8{f) in the Southwest Area Community Plan states that the size, height, and type of on-site outdoor advertising displays within scenic corridors shall be the minimum necessary for identification. The Planning Commission may wish to consider more specific size and design guidelines for scenic highway corridor signage. Pursuant to Section 15311 of the California Environmental Act, the proposed signs are categorically exempt from the requirement for environmental review. STAFFRPT\VAR2 ~ FINDINGS: There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subject property in that the site encompasses u,u, acres, abuts a freeway and a state highway, and takes access through three driveways on an urban arterial roadway. A strict application of the code requirements would not even permit center identification signs at each of the site entrances which are located on a street frontage 1,300 feet in length. The variance is necessary for preservation of the applicant's ability to adequately identify the subject's 44 acre shopping center, a right which other shopping centers in the City enjoy as shown by signage survey. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to public welfare or to adjacent properties in that the signs will not obstruct the line of sight of motorists exiting the driveway and will have an attractive appearance enhanced by substantial landscape planting treatment. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the Southwest Area Plan Scenic Highway Policy in that the freeway oriented sign is substantially shorter than the maximum height permitted by the ordinance, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: SW: ks Exhibits: Attachments: 2. 3. 4. A. B. C. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT Resolution 90- approving Variance No. 2; and 2. APPROVE Variance No. 2 based on the analysis and findings contained herein and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Vicinity Map Proposed Sign Locations Typical Sign Elevation Typical Landscape Planting Treatment Resolution Conditions of ApprOval Letter from Applicant STAFFRPT\VAR2 5 PHIBIT NO. :L ii984 UJ' ' ';4 :OXGiOvE 85 ADAM CIR. 63 64 Vl,~ MONIARO 65 VIA MUNSAnAI E 66 IIM ~IREE ~ ~: . 67 CO~F ~SA ~ .-" . ' 6R ~URI[ '~A~NA .:.:' 70 ~ROL~}UD CI ?1 WIII~P[IIING WIND CI ' 12 ~D SI'IIINGS 73 ION(H)N DR ~5 NUl nNC;~m t nU ~ '~', 16 OIIAL~)(iL) CI ~ CALl( [SP~NA 80 BUFF y WY 81 CORIE FLAMENCO 82 AlllENA LN ,3 M,MO~ OR C~' '" ~..' ~.. CounlJ/ Admin. Ctr. SITE Winch~ uare E S'::)L , qhwa~ AUTO CE brary · '('e F,tl, cljt& Ha: AtesilO ,,~,./'~./*"' ,{~ " ,,--, ~ 'n%..;-; .... VIC 1A// T Y A~f P CIR, "CARl CC LOS ~ AVEN Cm,iA 0 Mt ~1 t(, I t~v4~v~ CIr. EXHIBIT NO. ::}., ~N i i,!'~· ,!'. C / //, / EXHIBIT NO. 3 MERV 'S L EXHIBIT THERE WILL BE (4) SIGNS OF THIS TYPE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLOT PLAN. EACH SIGN MONOLITH WILL IDENTIFY A MAXIMUM OF (4) TENANTS. EXHIBIT NO. 4 t ,.( r O NtX_ DACTVLWERA ~Ik~TE: PALM CHAM[ROP$ HUMILlS MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM ANNUAL COLOR AGAPANTHU$ AFRICANUS ~,. I QAL. LLV.OF.THE.NILE PROJECT MONUMENT 81GN PYLON IIGN i I ~3AL. 15 GAL. 11 AGAPANTHU$ AFRICANUS LILY-OF.THE-NILE CHAMEROPS HUMILlS MEOrTERRANEAN FAN PALM RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA '$PRINGTNE° INDIA H,~WTHORN ~TOipOiUU TOeIRA "VARIEGAT A' 6 GAL.'MOCK ORANGE teAWN,,MARATHON l I XYLOIMA CONGESTtIM 'COMPACTA' SeAL., NCN IAZANIA RIGENS LEUCOLANA FLATI *WHITE TRAILING GAZANIA ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2 TO PERMIT FIVE FREESTANDING SIGNS AT THE PALM PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Variance No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zonin9, Plannin9 and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Variance application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Variance on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Variance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. That theTemecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty ~30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: I1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. {2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\VAR#2 1 ~b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, Ihereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Variance is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: ~1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. 12) The Planning Commission finds, in approVing projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Variance No. 2 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. PursuanttoSectionlS.26{e), no Variance may be approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any Variance approved shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. STAFFRPT\VAR#2 2 E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Variance proposed is compatible with the health, safety and weifare of the community. SECTION 2. EnvironmentaI Compliance. Pursuant to Section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act, on-site advertising signs are categorically exempt from environmental review. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Variance No. 2 for five free-standing signs located at Palm Plaza subject to the conditions: Attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this first day of October, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\VAR#2 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Variance No. 2. DATED: By Name Title $TAFFRPT\VAR2 4 ATTACHMENT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VARIANCE NO. 2 Council Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department The applicant shall submit a Plot Plan application for approval of the sign program. Individual signs shall require approval of a plot Plan application and issuance of a building permit. 3. The appearance and location of the free-standing signs shall conform substantially with that shown in Exhibits 2, 3 and 4. This approval shall be used within one year of the approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void, and a new application will be required. BEDFORD PROPERTIES August 13, 1990 Mr. Scott Wright CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SUBJECT: PALM PLAZA 8IGNAGE VARIANCE Dear Scott: Bedford Properties is requesting a variance to the signage ordinance. As we discussed, the following is the proposal: o All signs to be of same design, material and color o One freeway sign o One sign on Winchester Road (12' height) o One sign at each of the entrances on Ynez. The center entrance sign 16'7", the others at 12'. o All sign areas and height within ordinance requirements. o We will also provide a landscape detail for the base of the sign that enhances the appearance. Bedford Properties also surveyed some of the shopping centers in Temecula. We found that the Rancho California Town Center has nine tenant signs on Rancho California and Ynez Roads. The Tower Plaza has four on Ynez and two freeway signs. Old Adobe Plaza has two tenant signs; Winchester Square has six; and Rancho Temecula Center has five. We base the variance on equity, fairness and a reasonable consideration to the ordinance since it does not allow for differences in the size of a center or length of its frontage on adjoining streets. Palm Plaza tenants should be able to enjoy good roadside signage identity as would a small shopping center. It is not equitable under the ordinance that a 10,000 or 20,000 sq. ft. center may be allowed two signs while a 430,000 sq. ft. center still is only allowed two signs. The signs are located on the two highways and at the entrances for easy shopper identification. Mr. Scott Wright CITY OF TEMECULA August 13, 1990 Page 2 Bedford Properties is requesting staff to recommend for approval a total of 5 freestanding signs for Palm Plaza. Sincerely, G~ EJ~ i ckso~~ Area Manager GAE/dh Attachment cc: Gary Thornhill ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ff TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department October 16, 1990 Plot Plan No. 41, Variance No. 1 PREPARED BY: Karen Castro RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: R EPR ESENTAT ) VE: Same PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZON I NG: EXISTING LAND USE: Michael and Rose Thesing Convert and existing 1,200 sq .ft. office to restaurant with outdoor dining and a variance to allow for a reduction in parking. 28636 Front Street, Suite 109, the northeast corner of Front Street and Main Street. C-1 North: South: East: West: C-1 ( General Commercial) C-1/C-P ( General Commercial ) C- 1 ( General Commercial ) C-1 ( General Commercial) Office/Retail STAFFRPT\PP41 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Office/Retail South: Antique Shop East: Antique Shop West: Restaurant STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 41 and Variance No. 1 based on the findings in attached staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as amended by the Planning Commission Hearing of September 17, 1990. Attachments: Draft minutes of September 17, 1990, Plannin9 Commission Minutes. Plannin9 Commission staff report package dated September 17, 1990. STAFFRPT\PP41 2 ProDo.~a~ to convert an existing ] ,200 square foot office to restaurant with outdoor dl. ninq area, Located at 28636 ~'rnnt Street , 'Pemecu] a. GARY THORNHI[.L provided the staff report on this item. HP .,-~ated that a]tnouan Dark~ng ~s an issue in the O.!d '['own area, It was not an i. ssue for other restaurant permits ~.~sxIe(~ by t~e County, therefore staff recommends a. nnrova I. OJ~ thi. s project . COMMISSIONER HOAGI,AND stated that Condition No. 17 should tnctude Rancho CaLifornia Water District and ~a.qfPrD Mllr]lC1Da) Water D~strlct. MIKE THESING, aPPlicant and owner of the building, 50~6 Ha,lofax Roa~0 Arcadia, addressed the issue of Dar~in~. He stated that he felt that his project will not impact DarK~n~ ~ue to the fact that a majority of the merchants wi[i be employees in the Old Town area. Mr. Tbes~na ~uestjoned jf the reference to developer in Condition No. 27 would be himself. GARY THORNHILL stated that Mr. Thesin~ would be considered the developer an~ that this was a standard condition. WILLIAM PERRY, 28615 Front Street, Temecula, expressed his approval of the project. MICHELE PERRY, 28636 Front Street, Temecula, expressed net approval of the project. LLOYD SEVERS, 30105 Cabrlllo Avenue, Temecula, expressed his approval of the Project. He stated that he owned the Sears store and two lots adjacent to the project and that he would allow off-site oarkino on his property for the restaurant. MIN.9/17/90 -15- 9/21/90 COMMISSIONER FORD ~uest~oned if the parking Lot was restr3cte~ at th3s t~me to owners and occupants. The applicant, MIKE THESING, stated that they would accept unrestrlcted park]ha ~ur3na non-business hours. COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing and approve Variance No. ] based on findings contained in the Staff Report and adopt Resolution No. and approve P.lot PJan No. 41 subject to the conditions of Approval as submitted and to include unrestricted Parking durjna non-Ousjness hours. COMMISSIONER FORD seconded the motion, with Condition No. 17 amended to include RancOo California Water District and Eastern Municpal Water District. COMMISSIONER FAHEY accepted the amendment to the motion. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Biaxr, Fahey, Ford, Hoag]and NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: :1 COMMISSIONERS: Chinjaeff COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF returned to the chair. 1]. CHANGE OF ZONE 5714 13.1 Proposal to chan~e zone from M-SC to C1/CP. Property located at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson. GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that this item should not be on the agenda. He indicated the item was received late and should be submitted to the C.~ty Council. 12. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046 12.3. Proposal to extend an existing canopy. Property located at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson. MIN. 9/17/90 -16- 9/21/90 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be re-claimed by telephoning 694-1989." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking space shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint, of at least three 13) square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Engineering Department Riverside County Fire Department Environmental Health Rancho California Water District Eastern Minicipal Water District Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the City Planning Department prior to building permit issuance. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval: Sign Program Landscape, Irrigation and Shading Plan Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit "A". Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department Approval. All trash enclosures shall be centrally located within the project and shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with either masonry block and a gate or chain link fencing with landscaping and will screen the bins from external view. Any landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum of 6 feet in height at maturity. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within parking areas. All existing specimen trees shall be preserved whenever feasible, where they cannot be preserved, they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director, STAFFRPT\PP41 3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 17, 1990 Prepared By: Karen Castro Case No.: Plot Plan No. 41, Variance No. 1 Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: Michael & Rose Thesing Michael & Rose Thesing Convert an existing 1,200 square foot office to restaurant with outdoor dining and a Variance to allow for a reduction in parking. 28636 Front Street, Suite No. 109; the northeast corner of Front Street and Main Street. C-1 ( General Commercial ) North: C - 1 South: C-1/C-P East: C-1 West: C- 1 ( General Commercial ) ( General Commercial ) ( General Commercial) { General Commercial ) Not requested· Office/Retail North: South: East: West: Off/ce/R etail Antique Shop Antique Shop Restaurant Number of Acres: No. of Buildings: · 87 ( 38, 100 sq. ft. ) Site is developed with a 2-story, 14,800 sq.ft. office building. The site was originally approved for development of a 2-level 14,800 square foot office/retail building under Plot Plan No. 4138, per Riverside County STAFFRPT\PP41 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: P!anning Department. An application for revision to that approval was submitted May 24, 1990 to the City of Temecula Planning Department requesting conversion of a 1,200 square foot unit of said office to a restaurant/bar with approximately 780 square feet of outdoor dining area. Variance No. 1 was submitted on August 14, 1990 requesting a special review of parking and a reduction in the number of required spaces. Area Settinq The project site is located in "Old Town" Temecula. The surrounding area is developed with commercial office, retail, and tourist oriented businesses which reflect the historical western theme of "Old Town". The applicant is proposing to convert an existing 1,200 square foot office to restaurant/bar with approximately 780 square feet of outdoor dining. 24 seats are proposed for indoor dining and 28 seats proposed for outdoor dining. The applicant filed Variance No. 1 on August 14, 1990 requesting a special review of parking. The request is to reduce parking from the 81 spaces required to 48 existing spaces provided. Refer to facts presented in Findings. C i rculation / T raffi c/Parki nq Access is provided by a one-way entry off Fourth Street which runs south through the site and exits onto Main Street. The internal site circulation plan provides adequate space for users to comfortably drive through the project to park. The City Transportation Engineering Staff has conducted a cursory review of trip generation comparing the previous use as a real estate office with the proposed restaurant use ( see attachments). Staff reviewed the information provided in the report and determined that traffic impacts will result from peak noon hour trips. However, the remaining peak parking demands (dinner hour, weekends) will occur at different times than the existing remainder of businesses in the center, which demonstrates that a reduction in parking may be warranted per Section 18.12, STAFFRPT\PP41 2 GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINGS: Subsection E-5 of Ordinance 348. The applicant has also expressed a willingness to remove existing "Customer Only" parking signs and allow the entire Iot to be utilized by the public for general parking for "Old Town" during evening and weekend tourist trade hours. Conditions of Approval have been incorporated which will mitigate the project's traffic impacts. Architectural Compatibility The proposed theme is an Early Spanish Cantina. The proposed exterior elevations are consistent in materials and style with the buildings that currently exist in the surrounding area. The project was reviewed and approved by the Old Town Temecula Architectural Control Committee on August 6, 1990 as keeping with their goals and objectives of preserving the old western atmosphere of "Old Town". (See attachment: August 6, 1990 meeting minutes. ) Compatibility With Surrounding Properties The project site is located in the heart of the Historical District and is surrounded predominantly by tourist-oriented retail uses. The proposed restaurant use is typical of Old Town developments and will be supportive of weekday old town business and weekend tourist trade. The project is designated commercial on the Southwest Area Plan. The proposed restaurant conversion complies with the general policies for commercial uses. It is anticipated that the project, as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's forthcoming General Plan. The proposed project is a minor alteration to an existing building and is a Class 3 categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA guidelines. Variance No. 1 The proposed use will not have a substantial adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. Traffic impacts will STAFFRPT\PP41 3 Re mitigated through peak hour offset and Conditions of Approval attached herewith· Temecula's Old Town in and of itself is a unique settin9. Most lots are considered substandard by modern criteria and were originally developed without adequate parking, landscaping, and improvements. These are considered legal non-conformin9 uses. The applicant's site is better suited for an assembly] restaurant with more improved park]n9 area available than the majority of developed sites in the Old Town District. The applicant prepared a survey of comparable restaurant uses in the Old Town District ( see Exhibits ), and staff has completed field checks verifyin9 that numerous restaurant sites exist in the Old Town District that are seriously lackin9 in adequate parkin9. Due to a lack of a comprehensive Ion9 term parkin9 plan addressin9 Old Town's specific development concerns, a denial of this application may result in a denial of certain property rights currently enjoyed by surroundin9 properties. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan once it is adopted based on analysis in the Staff Report. Plot Plan No. 41 The proposed use will not have a substantial adverse effect on abuttin9 property or the permitted use thereof. The site has adequate access for the proposed use. The proposed project will not inhibit or restrict future ability to use active or passive solar energy systems. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. STAFFRPT\PP41 4 These findings are supported by staff analysis, maps and exhibits associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. The proposed development is commercial in nature and conforms with existing surrounding uses. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in the Staff Report. There is a probability that the project will not deter, or interfere with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the new General Plan. The lawful Conditions stated in this approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. APPROVE Variance No. 1 based on findings contained in the Staff Report. 2. ADOPT Resolution No. and APPROVE Plot Plan No. 41 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, based on the findings contained in the Staff Report. KC:ks Attachments: 1. Exhibits 2. Conditions of Approval STAFFRPT\PP41 5 MEMORANDUM THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Gary Thornhill August 22, 1990 PLOT PLAN NO. 41 - ROSA'S CANTINA - TRIP GENERATIONS The Transportation Engineering Staff has conducted a cursory review of trip generation comparing the previous use as a real estate office with the proposed use as a restaurant. The findings are as follows: Previous Use: Square Footage: Operatin9 Hours: No. of Employees: Trip Generation: Trip Generation for Remainder of Center: Proposed Use: Square Footage: Operating Hours: Seating: Number of Employees: Trip Generation: Real Estate Office 1,200 sq. ft. 8: 00 AM to 5: 00 PM, M-F 12 Approximately 50 trips/day, M-F (no peak - even distribution) Approximately 530 trips/day, M-F (with 10% occurring in PM peak hours) High turnover - sit down restaurant 2,050 sq. ft. 11: 30 AM to 9: 00 PM, M-S 52 Approximately 415 trips/day, M-F Approximately 455 trips/day on Saturday Approximately 415 trips/day on Sunday Restaurant peak (noon) hour is approximately 95 trips TRAFFIC\M15 Gary Thornhill August 22, 1990 Page 2 Trip Generation for Remainder of Center: Approximately 530 trips/day, M-F I with 10% occurring in the PM peak hour) Should you have any further questions regarding this information, please call. KW: ks CC: Sam Reed Karen Castro Sayed Omar Tom Sorrentino File PARKING CALCULATION - PLOT PLAN "ROSA'S CANTINA" Previous Use: Square Footage: Operating Hours: Number of Employees: Parking Required: Parking Required for Remainder of Center: Office Space, 1 per 200 = Total Spaces Required Total spaces Provided Proposed Use: Operating Hours: Seating: Number of Employees: Parking: Alternate Parking Calculation on Seating: Based Real Estate Office 1,200 sq.ft. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., M-F 12 6 spaces ll,O00 sq.ft. Net 55 spaces +6 spaces 61 spaces q8 spaces Convert 1,200 sq. ft. real estate office to restaurant with an additional 850 sq .ft. of outdoor dining area. 11:30 a.m. - 9:00 p.m., weekdays/weekends 2q indoor seats 28 outdoor seats 1,044 sq. ft. service area I space per 45 sq .ft. 4 employees at 1 space per every 2 employees Total Total required for Center: Total provided: = 24 spaces = 2 spaces 26 spaces 81 spaces 48 spaces Proposed restaurant with 52 seats 1 space per every 3 seats = + remainder of center = Total required Total provided 18 spaces 55 spaces 73 spaces 48 spaces PLANNING\P1 . CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No. 41 Council Approval Date: Expiration Date: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Convert an existing 1,200 square foot office space to restaurant with outdoor dining and a variance to allow for reduced parking. Assessor's No. 922-034-08 and 09 Planninq Department The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for a restaurant with indoor/outdoor dinin9 and a variance to allow for a reduction in parking. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers and employees from any claims, action or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, Appeal Boards or Legislative body concerning this approval· The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify permittee of any such claim, action or proceedin9 or fails to cooperate fully in the defense the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. This approval shall be used within two 12) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two ~2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on September 17, 1992. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit "A", or as amended by these conditions. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 ) year or more, this approval shall become null and void· Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-d-way. STAFFRPT\PP41 1 The applicant shall comply with all Road Department recommendations outlined in the City Engineerin9 Department conditions, attached. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated July 16, 1990, a copy of which is attached. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate Section of Ordinance No. 546 and the Riverside County Fire Wardens transmittal dated July 11, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Plannin9 Consistency Check Review required prior to permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the State of California Department of Transportation transmittal dated July 3, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 12. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Environmental Health Services transmittal dated July 16, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 13. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation and shadin9 plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Said landscape plans shall be submitted prior to buildin9 permit issuance. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition· Planrings within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to 9row higher than thirty inches. 14. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, three 13) copies of a parking, landscaping, irrigation, and shading plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in the City of Temecula fee Schedule dated September, 1990. 15. A minimum of 48 parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the approved Exhibit "A". 16. A minimum of two 12) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit "A" . Each parkin9 space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the international symbol of accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parkin9 space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parkin9 space finished grade, STAFFRPT\PP41 2 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan and adequate maintenance of said planting for one ( 1 ) year shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. 26. All of the foregoing Conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Engineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regardin9 the true meanin9 of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineerin9 Department. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 27. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreernent may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assumin9 benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. 28. Signal mitigation fees shall be paid to the City of Temecula. 29. Install Directional Signing indicating one way traffic in the parking area. STAFFRPT\PP41 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 41 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT AT FRONT AND MAIN STREETS. WHEREAS, Michael and Rose Thesing filed Plot Plan No. 41 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Plot Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearin9 pertainin9 to said Plot Plan on , at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. the following findings: Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty {30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: ~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. 12) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be FORMS\RESOLUT 5 studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. Ic) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: la) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 41 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30{c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: I 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law FORMS\RESOLUT 6 and City ordinances. 12 ) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property, E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surroundin9 property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. project will Declaration, An initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed not have a significant impact on the environment· and a Negative therefore· is hereby 9ranted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the city of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No. 41 for the operation and construction of a restaurant located at the corner of Front Street and Main Street subject to the followin9 conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of · 1990. RON PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS DAVID F. DIXON CITY CLERK FORMS\RESOLUT 7 APPLI CANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No. L~I. DATED: By Name Title FORMS\RESOLUT 8 jec/TMres2a RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. ~'| TO PERMIT OPERATION OF A[ WHEREAS, [Applicant] fil Plot Plan No. ~ in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning,'Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has ado 3ted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on~~pp. ~ |g~f) , at which time interested an pers3ns had ortuAity to testify either in support or opp sition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Plot Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on , at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be -1- jec/TMres2a consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: -2- (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (a) proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: (1) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of State law and City ordinances. (2) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible -3- jec/TMres2a with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for th~s project indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. cons ru tion of ~.~m ~ located at the .~~~ {~~~ ~ · subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this , 1990. day of RON PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS DAVID F. DIXON CITY CLERK -4- APPLICANT ' S ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~ I have read, understand and accept the conditions 'for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No. __. DATE D: By Name Title -5- ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department October 16, 1990 Plot Plan No. 11688, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 PREPARED BY: Mark Rhoades RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Wescon Properties REPRESENTATIVE: J. F. Davidson Associates PROPOSAL: Subdivide 4.7 acres into 10 parcels, and construct a 9 unit planned industrial complex. LOCATION: Southwest side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road. EXISTING ZONING: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The subject site is Lot 11 of Parcel Map No. 19580 located in the Rancho California Business Park. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 is an application to create 10 parcels on 4.7 acres. The parcels will range in size from 5,520 to 6,380 square feet. Nine lots will be utilized as office building pads and the tenth lot will cover parking, access, and landscaping. Plot Plan No. 11688 is an application to construct a nine (9) unit planned industrial development. The buildings will be industrial office uses, no manufacturing will be conducted on site. The buildings will be constructed to reflect similar contemporary architecture. Exterior materials will STAFFRPT\PP11688 1 BACKGROUND: consist of off white stucco, black tinted glass, reflective glass, and trim colors of aquamarine, blue or maroon. Landscaping and parking for this proposal exceeds the standards set forth under Ordinance 348. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 and Plot Plan No. 11688 were considered and approved l by a vote of 4-0) by the Planning Commission on October 1, 1990. .~,t that time, the applicant requested that the CC&R's should be a condition of approval of the tentative parcel map only, and not a condition of the plot plan· However, the Commission decided that the CC&R's should remain as a condition for the Plot Plan in order to facilitate site maintenance· STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: RECEIVE AND FILE Resolution No. 90- approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 and Plot Plan No. 11688 subject to the Conditions of Approval· MR:ks Attachments: 2. 3. Exhibits Resolutions Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Staff Report ( Dated October 1, 1990 ) Planning Commission Minutes ( Dated October 1, 1990 ) STAFFRPT\PP11688 2 Rancl Tem~cula ',. Golf Z w~ RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25632 TO SUBDIVIDE A L~.7 ACRE PARCEL INTO 10 PARCELS AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE. WHEREAS, Wescon Properties filed Parcel Map No. 25632 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approval of said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty 130) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. STAFFRPT\PP11688 !c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, I hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: I1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan· ~ 2 ) The Planning Commission finds. in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title. each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Parcel Map No. 25632 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~C) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 6.5, no Parcel Map may be approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any Parcel Map approved shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. proposed is community. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the STAFFR PT\PP11688 2 SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment. There will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditons of Approval have been added to the project. A Negative Declaration. SECT I ON 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Parcel Map No. 25632 for the subdivision of a 4.7 acre parcel into 10 parcels located at the southwesterly side of Business Park Drive subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\PP11688 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Parcel Map No. 25632. DATED: By Name Title STAFFRPT\PP11688 C}TY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66Ll99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance LI60. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer· Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access· All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. Legal access as required by Ordinance L~60 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a City maintained road. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. STAFFRPT\PP11688 1 Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Building and Safety. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 24, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 10. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 24, 1990, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. 11. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated September 4, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 12. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated May 1, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 13. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Crading Section's transmittal dated May 16, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 14. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Pa)omar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. 15. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 9, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 16. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Southern California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 17. Subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County Ceologist*s Report dated July 3, 1989. 18. Prior to recordation of this map, a reciprocal access agreement covering Parcel 10 shall be recorded for Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 19. Prior to occupancy, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Nagative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the STAFFRPT\PP11688 2 Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. GRADING: 20. Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by City Ordinance or resolution. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 21. No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financin9 measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars I$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City of Temecula Buildin9 and Safety as mitigation for public library development. 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the followin9 agencies: Road Department Ervironmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department. 23. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the M-SC zone for a Planned Industrial Development. 24. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 25. Prior to the recordat/on of the Final Map, the following condition(s) shall be complied with: A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS: 26. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the City. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. STAFFRPT\PP11688 3 The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through the luminare." Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject property as of the date of recordation of the final map. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the Riverside County Surveyor· No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any building in Parcel Map No. 25632 until the developer or the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance with the terms of said agreement for the financing of public facilities. "This property is affected by earthquake faulting and ground fissures. Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault and Ground Fissure Hazard Area." "County Geologic Report No. 601 was prepared for this property on September 2, 1988 by Schaefer Dixon Associates, and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern are as follows: earthquake faulting, fissuring and ground subsidence, seismic design of structures, liquefaction, and uncompacted trench backfill." Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration· 27. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions· STAFFRPT\PP11688 PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL: 28. Parcel No. 10 shall be jointly owned by all parcels within Parcel Map No. 25632 and shall be subject to all conditions contained within the recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions I CC&R's). 29. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCSR's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Plannin9, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CCSR's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties havin9 any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following conditions: a. The CCSR's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. g. In addition to the above, the CC&R's shall include the following: Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. STAFFRPT\PP11588 5 30. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; and CATV Franchise. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by a property owners association or other means acceptable to the City· Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Plannin9 and Engineerin9 Department. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit, if required, shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. Dedication shall be made of the following right-of-way on the following streets: DEDICATE Business Park Drive TO 39 FEET FROM STREET CENTERLINE All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. The subdivider shall construct or post security 9uaranteein9 the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and 9utter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signin9, stripin9, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping ( street and parks)· d. Sewer and domestic water systems. The subdivider shall provide bonds and agreement clearances from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of the map. STAFFRPT\PP11688 6 38. 39. 41. 43. 45. 47. 50. 51. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoinin9 developments. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for a traffic signal impact. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. It is understood that the Tentative Map correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways and drainage courses, and that their omission may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments, The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. STAFFRPT\PP11688 7 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 52. Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 28 feet from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half- width dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 111,156/78). 53. In the event that full half street improvements plus a lane are not constructed for Business Park Drive prior to issuance of Certification of Occupancy by the developer of Parcel Map No, 19580, the applicant shall construct those required improvements adjacent to the project and to the intersection of Single Oak Drive. 54. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assumin9 benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. 55. Pavement stripin9, markin9, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer. 56. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City En9ineer. S~AFFRPT\PP11688 8 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11688 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITY AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE. WHEREAS, Wescon Properties filed Plot Plan No. 11688 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. ( 2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. STAFFRPT\PP11688 1 The proposed use or action compiied with other appiicabie requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: {1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. ( 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 11688 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Ib) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. ~C) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: ( 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. (2) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. STAFFRPT\PP11688 2 E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment. There will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditons of Approval have been added to the project. A Negative Declaration. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot Plan No. 11688 for the operation and construction of an industrial park located at the southwest side of Business Park Drive subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1990. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT~PP11688 3 APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No, 11688. DATED: By Name Title STAFFRPT\PP11688 ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No. 11688 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the City Council approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 11688, or as amended by these conditions. I n the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 ) year or more, this approval shall become null and void. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed on-site so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way, and shall comply with Ordinance No. 655. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit seven 17 ) copies of parking, landscaping, shading and irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348. A minimum of 265 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3) inches on four (4) inches of Class II base· A minimum of 12 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street STAFFRPT\PP11688 1 parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one ~1 ) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the following: 10. 11. 12. 13, 14. "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning " In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have surface identification sign duplicatin9 the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least three 13) square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of a buildin9 permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Engineering Department Environmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Buildin9 and Safety. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees along the streets, and within the parkin9 areas. This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall be the application of the proper Uniform Buildin9 Code standards in the development of this project. Mitigations outlined in the approved Geotechnical Report shall be adhered to. Evidenced compliance with those conditions shall be presented to the Buildin9 and Safety Department prior to the issuance of building permits. This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of any buildin9 permit by the Temecula Department of Buildin9 and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended structure or buildin9 is safe and structurally integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not limited to, the site specific seismic, 9eolegic and geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 24, 1990, a copy of which is attached. STAFFRPT\PP11688 2 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control Distrjcrs ~etter dd[:d A~~:~ ?~. lc)90. a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of occupancy permits. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated September 4, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated May 1, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated May 16, 1990, a copy of which is attached. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District ~ransmittal dated May 9, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Southern California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County Geologist's Report dated July 3, 1989. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, a signing and striping plan along with a street improvement plan' shall be approved by the City Engineer. Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of planrings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. STAFFRPT\PP11688 3 27. 28. 29. 30. Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance no. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new building and parking structure. No building or portion thereof shall be permitted within the fault hazard zone identified in the County Geologist's letter dated July 3, 1990. All signage shall be by separate permit. Landscape plans shall require separate permit. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regardin9 the true meanin9 of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineerin9 Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 31. The applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District City Engineer Environmental Health Fire Department Plannin9 Department Riverside County Flood Control Eastern Municipal Water District Riverside Transit Agency CATV Franchise 32. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans. 33. The developer shall submit four (4) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. STAFFRPT\PP11688 4 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 41. 42. 43. The developer shall submit four ~4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Flood Zone "B" subject to flooding depth of 12" during a 100 year storm event, All building needs to be protected from this hazard. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer. A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. This study shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed conditions, including hydrology and hydraulic calculations. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid, All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside Standard No. 207. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. STAFFRPT\PP11688 5 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCF~R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CCF~R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CCF, R's shall be subject to the followin9 conditions: a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CCSR's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities· The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CCF, RIs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owneris sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CCF, RIs or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 28 feet from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half- width dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 111, ( 56/78 ). In the event that full half street improvements plus a lane are not constructed for Business Park Drive prior to issuance of Certification of Occupancy by the developer of Parcel Map No. 19580, the applicant shall construct those required improvements. Adjacent to the project and to the intersection of Single Oak Drive. S'rAFFRPT\PP11688 6 50° Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. 51. Pavement stripin9, marking, traffic and street name signin9 shall be installed per requirements of the Traffic Engineer. 52. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoinin9 developments. 53. The main driveway shall be constructed at 24' curb-to-curb widths. 3TAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, 1990 Case No.: Plot Plan No. 11688 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 Prepared By: Mark Rhoades Recommendation: Approval APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: Wescon Properties J. F. Davidson Associates Subdivide 4.7 acres into 10 parcels, and construct a 9 unit planned industrial complex. Southwest side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road. M-SC IManufacturing - Service Commercial) North: M-SC [Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) South: M-SC IManufacturing - Service Commercial ) East: M-SC [Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) West: M-SC I Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) Not requested. Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant Vacant Vacant Industrial/Office No. of Acres: No. of Buildings: 4.7 9 The original application for this proposal was filed to the County of Riverside on December 18, 1989 and consisted of a plot plan and a tentative parcel map application. The case files were transferred to the City of Temecula in May, 1990. The County PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,_urnbined the appIications under Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632. However, the applicant has expressed his desire to keep the two applications separate. In the event of approval, construction could begin on the plot plan without waiting for the finalization of the parcel map. Conditions of Approval have been separated to facilitate this process. Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 is a proposal to subdivide 4.7 acres into 10 parcels. The existing parcel is Lot 11 off Parcel Map No. 19580, which created the Rancho California Business Park. Under this proposal, Parcels 1 through 9 I Tentative Parcel Map 25632) range in size from 5,520 to 6,380 square feet. Parcel No. 10 is designated for all the parking and access areas which will be governed by CC&R's prior to the Final Approval of the Parcel Map. The zoning ordinance requires a 10,000 square foot minimum lot size within the M-SC zone; however, the reduced lot sizes in this zone are allowed if a Planned Industrial Project tP.I.D) is approved. This proposal is a P.I.D. as described below. Sufficient infrastructure exists in the immediate area to facilitate the demand of the proposed development. Access for all parcels will be created by a reciprocal agreement. CC[,R's for the proposed development will require approval from the City Attorney. Access to the general site will be taken via Business Park Drive. Plot Plan Plot Plan No. 11688 is a proposal to construct nine 19) industrial office buildings on 4.7 acres. Adequate landscaping is provided on site, including the 25 foot wide landscape easement required for the Rancho California Business Park. The building sizes, required parking, and provided parking are provided in the following matrix: Building No. 1: 5,160 sq.ft. Building No. 2: 5,160 sq.ft. Building No. 3: 5,160 sq.ft. Building No. 4: 6,408 sq.ft. Building No. 5: 6,408 sq.ft. Building No. 6: 6,408 sq.ft. Building No. 7: 5,160 sq.ft. Building No. 8: 6,408 sq.ft. GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: .~uitding No. 9: Total Area 5,1~08 sq. ft. 52,680 sq. ft. Required Parking (Section 18.12, 0rd.348, 1/200 sq.ft. ): 264 spaces Provided Parking 265 spaces None of the buildings require loading space because the project is proposed as an all office use. The provided parking exceeds the requirements of the Ordinance 348, Section 18.12. All nine (9) buildings are to reflect similar contemporary architecture. The exterior walls will be off white color stucco. The exterior elevations will also contain a substantial amount of black tinted and reflective glass inserts. The buildings will utilize trim colors that will include aquamarine, blue, or maroon. The tentative landscape plans suggest a park-like setting. Several different types of trees are proposed. Buildings are clumped together in three areas in order to increase landscape areas between and around them. This method also reduces the amount of pavement that would be necessary if the buildings were separated. The proposed project site contains over 30% of landscaped area, which exceeds the required 10% under Section 11 .~.e. No signage is proposed by this application. However a sign program for the project site will be required and will be approved by separate application. Zoninq The proposed Plot Plan and Tentative Parcel Map are a planned industrial development under Section 21.591c) of Ordinance 348. Lot area, width, and depth may be reduced if the project provides common parking and access. This project provides such, and prior to the recordation of the final map, CC~,R's will be recorded which will insure future compliance with this standard. The Southwest Area Plan designation for the proposed site is LI, Light Industrial. The proposed use is in conformance with this designation. Proper access, infrastructure, and public facilities improvements exist to support the proposed use. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City~s General Plan once adopted. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An initial Study has been completed for the project and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposal. FINDINGS: Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 The proposed division is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and Zoning Code in that the project is a Planned industrial Development. The lot design is logical and meets the approval of the City's Planning and Engineering Departments. The legal owner of record has offered to make all dedications required. The project may have a significant adverse affect on the environment. However, a Negative Declaration is recommended and all impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels through recommended conditions of approval. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, based on analysis contained in the Staff Report. e The division of land is consistent with the provision of Title 18 of the Subdivision Map Act. Plot Plan No. 11688 There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 11688 will be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The project may have a significant adverse affect on the environment. However, a Negative Declaration is recommended and all impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels 10. 11. through recommended conditions of approval. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, through appropriate building mass reduction techniques and landscape installation, and distance from planned adjacent structures. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the expanded initial study performed for this project. The design of the project, the type of improvements, and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632, and Plot Plan No. 11688; APPROVE Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632; and, 3. APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11688· based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Backqround 1. Name of Proponent: 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Wescon Properties 18102 Sky Park South Irvine, CA 92714 Date of Environmental Assessment: Agency Requiring Assessment: Name of Proposal, if applicable: Location of Proposal: 8-23-90 CITY OF TEMECULA Tentative Parcel Map 25632 and Plot Ran No. 11688 Southwest side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road II Envi tonmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Disruptions, displacements, compac- t(on or overcovering of the soil? X Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? X Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? X STAFFRPT\PP11688 1 Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes. landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement. moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water· Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? Yes X X X X Maybe No X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11688 2 Plant a. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Life· Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals Ibirds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? be Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X X Maybe NO X X X X X X X X STA FFR PT\PP11688 3 10. 11. 12. 13. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare· Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: ae Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: ae A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances l including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation ) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? be Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ae Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? YeS X Maybe X X X No X X X X X X cT ~ C:rO DT\ DD11 ARR 15. 16. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking}. Substantial impact upon exist/n9 transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or 9oods? ee Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services: Energy. Will the proposal result in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes X X X X X Maybe X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11688 5 17. 18. 19. 20. b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard l excludin9 mental health )? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? VeS Maybe X X No X X X X X X X X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11688 6 Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? ( A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No X X X X STAFFRPT\PP11688 7 Discussion of the EnvironmentaI Evaluation Earth 1. 8. No. Although the proposed project will result in cut and fill slopes there will not be changes in the base geologic substructures. The slopes shall be manufactured and compacted per the engineer's requirements and as a result, should not result in unstable earth conditions. Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree and results in soil displacement, compaction and over-covering· Further anaiysis wiil determine if additional mitigations are required. No. Development of the proposed project will not require substantial grading and as a result will not alter the existing topography. No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the site. ee Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the construction phase and remain high until disturbed areas are replanted· The wind erosion impact is considered high and significant but will be mitigated through minimal grading. retention of natural vegetation whenever feasible, and use of watering trucks and hydro-seeding disturbed areas after grading. No. There is no body of water near the project site which could be affected by the proposed project. Yes. The project site is located within a liquefaction and fault hazard zone area according to the Riverside County General Plan Geologic Hazard Map. A geologic report for the project should address these potential issues. Air 2. Maybe. Depending upon the amount of traffic generated by the project, an increase in carbon monoxide and particulate emissions will occur· This impact is not considered significant since the air emissions from this project is only an incremental impact to the area's air quality. b-c. No. The proposed project should not create any objectionable odors or alter the area's climate. Water 3. a,d-e. No. The proposed project will not affect any body of water. The closest body of water to the site is Murrieta Creek which is approximately one-half mile away. b-c,g. No. The proposed project will increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on the site which will reduce the amount of water absorption. However, the introduction of irrigation to the site will be off-set the water absorption rate. Drainage patterns will continue to flow to the streets and channels. No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or rate of flow of ground waters. No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply o system. Yes. The proposed project is within the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan and watershed area. To help mitigate the project's impact, a flood mitigation charge shall be paid· L~. a-d. No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the plant species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or endangered species should be affected. New species of plants will be introduced to the site as par of the landscape requirements for the project. The addition of the new species is not considered a negative impact. It is not clear by the plot plan if the existing Eucalyptus trees on the site will remain. Due to their maturity, as many should be retained as possible. The site is not currently used for agricultural purposes. Animal Life No. The proposed project is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a number of years. It is anticipated that the only animal life on or in the vicinity of the site includes squirrels, rabbits, lizards, and other animals common to the area. It is highly unlikely that an endangered specie habitales the site. Noise 6. a. Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since the surrounding land uses are not noise sensitive. No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project. Liqht and Glare Maybe. The proposed project is located within the hat. Palomar Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the use of low pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lights to help avoid interference with the Mt. Palomar telescope known as "Skyglow". The use of LPSV lights will reduce the light and glare produced by the proposed project. STAFFRPT\PP11688 Land Use No. The Southwest Area Plan designates the subject site for General Light Industrial. The surroundin9 land uses are also office and light manufacturing. Natural Resources 9. a-b. No. The proposed use will not increase the consumption rate of any natural or non-renewable natural resource. Risk of upset 10. a. Maybe. If the manufacturing tenant uses any hazardous materials in their operation, a list of hazardous substances and disposal plan shall be submitted to the City. No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with emergency vehicles. If street or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City and Police Department. Population 11. No. The proposed office/industrial building will generate some jobs but not a significant amount to alter the area's population. Housinq 12. No. The proposed office/industrial building will not generate a significant number of jobs to create a demand for additional housing. Transportation / Ci rcu lation 13. a,c. Maybe. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to and from the site. However, it is not anticipated that this increase will be significant. The traffic that is generated by the project may add an incremental impact to the Rancho California Roadl l-15 Interchange which is currently operating at capacity during peak hours· This potential impact may be mitigated by a transportation improvement mitigation fee. Yes. The proposed project will require parking to support the use. The project will need 265 parking spaces. The proposed plan illustrates spaces. Maybe. The proposed project will improve a portion of Business Park Drive which will ultimately loop around and connect to Rancho California Road. Completion of Business Park Drive will divert some traffic from the northern intersection of Business Park Drive and Rancho California Road. STAFFRPT\PP11688 No. The proposed project will not affect waterborne, rail or air traffic. Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Public Services 1~. a,b,e. Yes. The proposed industrial/office use will require public services in the areas of po)ice, fire, maintenance of roads, and public facilities. This impact is not considered significant. The incremental impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees assessed. Property taxes should mitigate the impact and continuing need for services over the long term. c,d,f. No. The project should not have a substantial effect on these public services. Enerqy 15. a-b. No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use or increase in demand of fuel or energy. Utilities 16. a-f. No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will not require substantial alteration to the exiting systems. Human Health 17 a-b. Maybe. If hazardous substances are stored in the warehouse, then that may create a potential health hazard. If hazardous materials will be warehoused at the site, a plan for their use and disposal should be submitted to the City. Aesthetics 18. No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open to the public. The elevations of the proposed project are consistent in architectural materials as the surrounding buildings. Recreation 19. No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses. Cultural Resources 20. a-d. No. The subject site has previously been mass graded and it is unlikely that the project will result in the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site. If a site is discovered, an archaeologist or paleontologist should be called on site to supervise the digging and determine if the site is significant. The proposed project will not impact any building of historic significance, affect unique ethnic cultural values or STAFFRPT\PP11688 11 restrict sacred uses. Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance 21. a-c. No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the natural environment, have long term environmental impacts or have considerable cumulative impacts. Maybe. If the proposed use warehouses hazardous materials, the project may cause a health hazard to human beings and wildlife. if hazardous materials are to be warehoused at the project, a plan for their use and disposal should be developed and approved by the City. The project may also have a substantial impact on the existing transportation system. To mitigate the potential impact at the Rancho California Road/1-15 Interchange, a traffic mitigation fee should be paid. STAFF R PT\PP 11688 12 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ticant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date For CITY OF TEMECULA STAFFRPT\PP11688 ,.....:..~ ~.~ ~. PARCEL' 38, , ~..-' 10 ' ...',..' " County of Riverside Department of Health P. O. Box 1370 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Karen Leininger, REHS III Subject: Tract 25632 - Supplemental SAN 53 Information Dear Ids. Leininger: In response to your December 14, 1989 request that was transmitted to us by Wescon Properties on March 7, 1990, we are happy to provide the following information describing EMWD's service responsibility to the subject project. Sanitary Sewer The estimated average daily wastewater flo~.;s from the subject project have been estimated as follows: ADF = (4.72 ACRES) (3000 GPD/ACRE) ADF = O. O 14 MGD i PDF: (2.5) (ADF) PDF: 0.035 MGD The project is located within the service area of the District's Rancho California Regional Water Reclamation Facility (RCRWRF), located in Temecula. The RCRWRF presently has a treatment capacity of 4.2 MGD and an average daily flow of 3.8 MGD. The RCRWRF is being expanded to 6.25 MGD. Availability of treatment capacity is dependent on the construction timing of the subject project. The nearest existing sewer to the subject project is a lO-inch diameter sewer located along Business Park Drive, fronting the eastern side of the subject project. No offsite improvements are necessary for the provision of service to the proposed development. Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · San Jacinco. California 92383-1300 · Telephone (714) 925-7676 · Fax (714) 929-0257 Main Office: 2045 S. SanJacinco Street, SanJacinto ' Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 F..2 Oakland Avenue, Hornet, CA "1,',,. L.2 i n i n _],a r Z'_' :'. ,_, :, ,: , : :; '},, Constructffon of an approved plan of sanitary sewer service ',,'ill a; for the subject project to be connected to the existing sewage co]~,ection, treatment and disposal system. This ;s comprised of a combffnatffon of gravity flow and pressurized sewer pipe] ines and treatment and d~sposal facj]fft~es. The d~sposal of treated ',.;astewater w~ll be accon;plished by a combination of State approved "benefffc~a] use" and percolat~on practices. A sewer does presently front the subject project· The developer is expected to propose an onsite sewer plan that incorporates an entirely gravity flow system of sewers located within road rights-of-way. Onsite sewers must be located in public right-of-way or in the center of easements that are a minimum of width of 20 feet, or twice the sewer depth, whichever is greater. The developer's proposed' plan must be approved by the District's Planning Department. Reclaimed Water 1 EMWD recommends the use of reclaimed water for irrigation of landscaped and open space areas in accordance with the District's Ordinance No. 68. The nearest reclaimed water facility is preliminarily master-planned to be located along Diaz Road, approximately one quarter (1/4) mile to the east of the subject project. The degree of water treatment in the source facility is planned to be tertiary effluent by late 1991. Landscaping associated with the subject project may represent a demand for reclaimed water. The developer is expected to submit a proposed plan of service that may incorporate the beneficial use of reclaimed water for the irrigation of landscaped areas and other uses as described by the District's Ordinance No. 68. A determination of the use of reclaimed water by the subject project will be made by the District after having reviewed additional information describing the subject project's service needs. Should you desire supplementary information, a further description of EMWD's Water Reclamation Program can be found in the District's Ordinance No. 68. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Ruth Newsham or Dave Crosley of the District's Department of Planning and Research at (714) 766-1880. Sincerely, H. A1 Spencer Director of Planning and Research HAS:RN:lp~_~ co: Wescon Properties/ W.O. #90-415 31/B -- :IiVE:I iDE COUrl .u PLArlrlin6 DEPA:t ITIErlC Ju~y 3, 1989 Schaefer Dixon Associates 22 Mauchly Irvine, CA 92718 Attention: Mr. Nicholas Selmeczy Mr. Paul Davis Mr. Dean M. White SUBJECT: Seismic/Geologic Hazard Project 80-182 APN: 921-020-037 Parcel Hap 19580 Building & Safety Log ~232505 County Geologic Report No. 601 Rancho California Area Gentlemen: We have reviewed your report entitled "Geotechnical Investigation, A Portion of Business Park III, Phase 2, Parcels 1, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Rancho California CA," dated September 2, 1988, and your response to County review, dated June 12, 1989. Your report determined that: The surface trace of a ground fissure extends northwest-southeast across the eastern part of Parcel 11, to the Parcel 10 property line. The trace can be followed in the shallow subsurface from the west side of Parcel 8 across Parcels g and 10. The fissure location is shown on Plate 1, Geotechnical Map of you report. A zone of previously unmapped faults ts associated with the above mentioned ground fissures, These pre-extsttng faults offset strata that are between approximately 3000 and 9100 years old. These faults are considered active Holocene faults based on State of California criteria. 3. There is a potential for future movements to continue along the active, Holocene faults, It is not expected that future displacement will occur away from the pre-extsttng, Holocene faults, 4080 LEMON STREEI, 9" FLOOR 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFO~NIA 92201 Schaefer Dixon Associates - 2 - July 3, t989 The Whittier-Elsinore (Wlldomar) fault is capable of generating very strong ground shaking at the subject site. Seismic data from events on this fault are as follows: Maximum Credible Earthquake Magnitude - 7.1 Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration - 0.70g lO0-Year Probable Earthquake Magnitude - 6.0 to 6.5 Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration - 0.35g to 0.41g Liquefaction of soils at the site is expected to be minimal. There is little or no potential for lateral spreading or ground lurching at the site. Potentially liquefiable soils 20 feet below proposed finish grades are not anticipated to produce sand boils that could reach the ground surface. Your report recommended that: No habitable structures shall be placed across the ground-surface fissures and active faults or in areas with potential for ground fissuring or faulting. 2. A Restricted Use Zone shall be established as shown on Plate 2, Recommended Restricted Use Zone. Proposed structures should be designed to accommodate settlements which may be induced by soil liquefaction. These settlements are expected to be less than 1/3 inch over a distance of 20 feet and will be in addition to settlemmnts induced by foundation and surcharge loads. An additional, detailed subsurface investigation and geotechntcal engineering analysis shall be required for the foundation design of each proposed building Sen building and grading plans become available. It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner and satisfies the additional information requested under the California Environmental quality Act review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval of the report is hereby given. We reconrnend that the following conditions be satisfied before recordatlon of any subdivision maps and/or issuance If any County permits associated with this project: smLl:l L~Jlue3 -0856T dwH ro~wmnli x'uoi - ,co, a,~t~ t 6u~pL~n8 moq~,so'i uuoN - (Z}/C~,a,~lS t I~u~pLlnla o, JiH LJw3 - tLL~S ul^e~,$ o $$~lJ~doJd pjo,4,pa8 ,ao~,} lO 6 d AJ. Nfi03 30Icjlt3AI~! ' sjnoX' ~Ctndl/CJsA 696I 'E XtnC ' E - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT GRADING SECTION TO: FROM: D~TE: APN: PLANNING / JEFF~/~S SAM D. GONZALEZ May 16, 1990 pm 25632 AMENDMENT # 2 EXHIBIT D 921-020-068 The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are included. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. All grading shall conform to the 457. Uniform Building Code and Ordinance Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' in vertical height with grass or ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284-47. Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security to be posted with the Building and Safety department. In instances where a grading plan involves import or export, prior to obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall have obtained approval for the import/export location from the Building and Safety Department - this may require a written clearance from the Planning Department. All drainage facilities shall be ~esigned to ~ccommodate 100 year storm flowq. Observe slope setbacks per Section 2907, Figure 29-1, Section 7011 and Figure 70-1 of the Uniform Building Code. NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, and 284-46. These forms are available at all Building and Safety Offices. Thank you. "/!-~I_'- ceFtlflcatlc. n does Dot constitute a ouaFantee ti:~t it 'Jill SLiDDLV water to such oarce/ map at. an'~ specific c(uant~t~es, flows or mressures for f~re protection or any other ourDose" This certification sha!! be sicne,J bY ~ resoonsible official of the water cc, mD3. nv. l'he pia:~o must ..be _submi ttod to the County Surveyor' s. Off_l~e to..[e~_iew_at..leas_t. two_. weeks prior the request for the record~tionOf___ the ._final map.. Thl ~ SL:i.!ZiI'71SLIDn ha~ a statement from Rancho Callfornl~ %',~atec Dietriot .~clce~incl to serve domestic water ]3tl']l'.i,2'.OCV ['lr~I]Cl31 arrar~aements are completed 3trlD,Jl,Tl,~er. it w~IL be necessary for f~nanc~al arranqempnt~ to be m~de DF1OF tO the recordat~on of the f~nai mao. Ti-~,.s suk, d~v~s~on ~s w~thln the Eastern Municipal Water D~st:-~ct and shall be connected to the sewers of the D~str~ct . The sewer system shall be ~nstalled accord~nq pL~r~ ~['[c] ~Declflcatlon~ a~ aDDroved by the District. f. ho Cc, untv '.F. urvevor and the Health Department. Permaner, t Or~r, ts of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in trlDfl=]ate. ~lonQ ~;lth the original drawlnQ, to the CounLV I~I~FVOVtDF. The prints shall show the lnt. ernal DIDo diameter, location of manholes, comDtete proflies, PiPe and joint specifications and the s~ze of the sewers at the .]unctlon of the new system to tl~e ~xl~tlnG A slnalo plat. ln,~icat~nq location c.f c~.~t~- llz~os water ilnes shali be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The mian~ shall be s~ned by a registered enalneer and the ~ewer d~str~ct w~th the certification: "[ cert~['v that the deslqr~ ot the system ~n Parcel HaD 25~32 ~s ~n accordance w~h the sewer system expansion Plans of the Eastern Municipal Water D~StFict and that the waste disposal system 1~ adequate at th~s t~me to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed O~rcei map," COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4065 RE: Paracel Map 25632: Be~n~ a subdxvls~on of Farce[ ,~t' F.{r,:.~[ MaD 195~3!] as shown zn Book 154 of Fareel Mams. t'~ees ?~-'jO. cec'crds cf Rzvers~de County. Callforn~a. i~ lot~) il A w~tec .3vs.tem ;h.~ll be zn;talled accordznQ to oi~ns and ~o~clf~cat~on as a~proved by the water ,:~:mDanv and the Hea[ th Debar tment . Permanent Dr l~t~ of th~ D[an~ of the water ~vstem shal 1 be submztted ~n tr~Dlzcate, wzth ~ mzn~mum net [e~s than one ~nch e~ual~ ~0f3 feet. alon~ wzth ort~na[ drawzn~ to the County Surveyor The or~nts shall ~how the znterna[ D~DG dzametc. r. [<,catzon of valves and fzre hvdrant~: DtDe and ~c.~nt sDeczfzcat~ons. and the szze of the maxn at the ltH~ctzon or' the new system to the ce~ects wzth Dzv. 5. Part l, Chamter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, Calzforn~a Administrative Code. T~tie Z2. Chapter To,, ~r,d tDrcler No. 103 of the Publxc Utilities L'r;.mm~sst,~z-~ of 5tare of California, when ~DD[lc~ble. The Dian~ ~haii ,~ ~zqned by a rer31stered enQ~neer and watmr company %/lth the t'oltowlna certification: "[ certztv that do~ l,'~n of tl~e %tat~,r system ~n Farcol MaD 25C. 3,'. ts tt~ i,:cordance with ~'~ water system ~xmanslon p[ans of the Sancho Callforn~a~ Water Dl~tr~ct and that the water ~rv~ce. storage ~nd d~trlbut~on gv~tem w, I i adeq[UaLe to m~ov~de wate~ ~erv~ce to ~Hch F'arc~l . The pla.,-,s must be subml tted to ._the County Surveyor ' s Office _to revle~.~ at_ ieas~._t~O..W_eeks,pr~_o[. to the request ~or .~b~. recof.datlon_ of__~be _f~n_al_map. [t %¢1!1 be necessary for f~nanclal arranaement5 to, bn ccmr. lletelv f~nai~zed prior to recordaLton of the fzr,~i maD. :F,:n,rereLv, !.:am :4Brt~ E.H.S. IV Envtrc, nr:.ental HeaLth Services SH:dr co: City of Temecula KENNETH L EDWAREDc~ 1935 MAF~KET STREET TE,EPHONE 7',2, 7~37-2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. P1 anner ,,./"'~'::~'/~' Area: We have reviewed ~h~s case and have the fo]]ow~'n9 commen~s: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of /P/-~/~J~<ZP The project will be free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements I~ave been constructed in accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. cc: Administrative Office · 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, C;A 92507 May 1, 1990 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Jeff Adams County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Parcel Map 25632, Amended Map No. 2 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Sincerely, Vaughn~Salrkisian Land Use Technician VS:sml WESTERN REGION LAND SERVICE~* OIVIBION REAL PROPERTIES AND ADMINI*aTRATIVE SERVICES Southern Ca/ifornia Edison Company P. 0. BOX 410 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801 100 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA g0802 Riverside County Road Department P.O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Subdivision Section SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 TELEPHONE (213) 491o2940 PAX (213) 491-2615 April 1l. 1990 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by Southern California Ed[:;on Company within the boundaries of sai. d tentative parcel map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s). nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for relocation of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires teloration of facil- ities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such teloration and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required pri'or to the performance of the teloration. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Dennis Bazant at (213) 491-2644. Sincerely, S. R. SHERMOEN Real Propert~/~ Agent~ .... 386(1l)WPC/]c co: Continental Lawyers Title Company J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. · h'ffl,'~ I %hnkh'I NI~trch 2~h. Rivers/de County Division of Environmental I-IeaIth Land Use Section Post Office Box 1370 Riverside, California 92502 SUBJECT: Water Availabilit}, Reference: Parcel Map 25632 Gclltlclllclt: Please bc advised that the above-retercnccd property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements (including all in-tract facilities) between RCWD and lhc property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the. property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if an.,,,, to RCWD. In response to your request, RCWD has provided the attached information. If you have any questions, please contact Senga Doherty at (714) 676-4101. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P. E. Engineering Manager F012B/jkm94f Attachment cc: Senga Doherty k, Ranch C-miferuia Winter District PI.ANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS S'I I{EF.T, SUITE 405 INDIO, CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 FIRE [)EP,\I~,TMF, NT I?; COCPERATIQN ',%!TH THE C~,LiFQF~',,!A DEP~,RTLIE~';T OF FOP. ESTRY A"~D F~RE PROTECT, Or; GI I.N I NF.x.V\IAN [.IRE CHIliF Sept. PI,ANNING & EN(;INEERING t760 IZTl[ SI'RILET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 /7~,1 275-4777 TO: ATTN: RE: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARCEL MAP 25632 The Riverside County Fire Department will address all fire protection requirements at the plot plan stage. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist ml PLANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405 INDIO, CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 RIVERSIDE tt)UN I Y FIRE DEPARTMENT I~,i C(DOPERA"'ION ',,%'~TH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PGRESTR',' AND RRE PROTECTtGH GI.EN J NE\VM:\N FIRE CHIEF Sept. 4, 1990 PLANNING & ENGINEERING 3760 IZTH STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 9250I (714) 275-4777 TO: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PLOT PLAN 11688 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"x4"x2~x2i), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways· The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. Rg: ~ L1688 Install a supervised water flow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as per Uniform Building Code. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code. 9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must appear on the title page of the building plans. 10. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. 11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 14. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabtel, Fire Safety Specialist ml I.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES / / .J:. z / OCTOBER 1, 1990 ill,. J lT'L'!m .... l ....~ "Blllmi. lild HEARING ITEMS TENTATIVE PARCEl. MAP NO. 25632 2.1 Proposal to subdivide 4.7 acres into 10 parcels in the M.S.C. zone, to construct an industrial park on the southwest side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho Ca]~forn~a Road. OI, IVER MUJICA presented the staff report on this item. WARREN JAMES, Wescon Properties representative, requested c]arification and modification of the following Conditions of Approval: Plot Plan No. 11688, Condition No. 27, Mr. James requested that this item read "Unless already paid, prior to"; Condition No. 47, RTA be deleted. COMMISSIONER FAHEY clarified that prior to the meeting, a revised set of Engineering Conditions were provided and under these revised Conditions Mr. James was requesting Condition No. 31 be deleted. Mr. 3ames also requested modifications to the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Hap No. 25632: Condition No. 18, to read "reciproca] access agreement or common ownership"; Condition No. 20, revised to read "Unless already paid, prior to" Condition No. 37, revised to read "If required, the subdivider"; Condition No. 42, Mr. James requested DRAFT MXN.10/l/90 -2- 10/10/90 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES that this Condition be deleted. THORNHII.I. agreed that this Condition could be deleted. OCTOBER l, 1990 JOHN MIDDI.ETON and GARY COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stated that the RTA was assigned to cover the AQMD reguirements for the City and therefore would remain as part of Condition No. 47. COMMISSIONER FORD advised Mr. James that the reciprocal access agreement would be a memorandum to the parcel map which would be further enforced by the CC&R's. MR. JAMES stated that he wanted to avoid having to record the CC&R's and Assistant City Attorney JOHN CAVANAUGH advised him that although it was suggested that the CC&R's be recorded, they did not have to be. COMMISSIONER FORD questioned if the Commission could require that the Conditions oi Approval be recorded and JOHN CAVANAUOH stated that they could. JOHN MIDDI.ETON stated that the reason the CC&R's were written in was to create an agreement between the City and the applicant as to how the site would be maintained. Assistant City Attorney JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that a separate landscape agreement could be prepared for the maintenance of the common areas. COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY and carried unanimously. AYES: 4 COMM I SS] ONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford Hoagland COMMISSIONER FAHEYmoved to Adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632, and Plot Plan No. 3.1688, Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 25632 and Approve Plot Plan No. 13688 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (as replaced by the Planning Department) with the following modifications: Plot Plan, Condition No. 27, amended to read "Unless previously paid"; Condition No. 31 to remain as is; Tentative Parcel Map, Condition No. 18 to remain as is; Condition No. 20 to read "Unless previously paid"; Condition No. 42 to be deleted. DRAFT MIN. 10 / 1/90 -3- 10/10/90 // // / PI.ANNING COMMIBSION NINHTES / OCTOBER l, 1990 COMMISSIONER B[.AIR seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: B]ajr, Fabey, Ford Chiniaeff COMMISSIONERS: None ARSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hoag] and ....... '{Tf"" T II MXM. 10 / 1190 DRAFT -4- to/xolgo ITEM NO. 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council City Manager October 16, 1990 Agency Agreements/California Endangered Species Permit RECOMMENDATION: That the Mayor be authorized to sign the attached agreement. This agreement will be executed by all members of the JPA conferring the California Endangered Species Permit Process. BACKGROUND: Attached you will find an Agency Agreement with reference to the Endangered Species Permit Process. This agreement has been approved by the California Department of Fish and Game and therefore needs to be executed by participating agencies. The City of Temecula is one of this participation agencies. 10/10/90 09:01 ~'213 236 2700 BV;a/ , a 002 VIA TELECOPIER October 9, 1990 213-236-2821 r,uc .o. 02351-006 The Mayor and Members Of the City Council City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 Re: Agency Agreement/Cali£ornia Endanqered Species Permit Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: The California Department of Fish and Game has replaced the previous version of the Agency Agreement and California Endangered Species Permit. The new version is attached. I recommend it be approved and executed. The Agreement has been signed in draft form by the California Department of Fish ~zmd Game and wa~ approved by the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, by a unanimous vote, on October 4, 1990. After the Agreement has been approved by the City Council, please have the appropriate official execute both copies of the Agreement and each of the additional signature pages. Retain one copy of the Agreement for your files and return the other Agreement and all of the additional signature pages to the Riverside County HCJPA. When they have received all of the signed Agreements and signature pageS, they will return a 10/10/50 09:01 ~'213 236 2700 B~V&S .... a 003 The Mayor and Members of the City Council October 9, 1990 Page 2 copy to you in order that every party to the Agreement may have a Eully executed copy. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, RUFUS C. YOUNG, JR. for BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN RCY/rc Eric. LTR12090 AGENCY AGREEMENT CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT THIS AGENCY AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated for reference purposes only as of October 4, 1990, is entered into by and between the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME (the "Depart- ment"), the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (the "County"), the CITY OF HEMET, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF PERRIS, CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF TEMECULA AND the CITY OF RIVERSIDE (individually "City" and collectively the "Cities"), and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY (the "JPA") with reference to the following: RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat ("SKR") is listed as a threatened species by the Department and the Department has recommended changing its status to endangered; and WHEREAS, the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (the "Service") has listed the SKR as an endangered species effective October 31, 1988; and WHEREAS, the County and Cities have submitted to the Service a Short-Term Habitat Conservation Plan for the SKR (the "Short-Term HCP") and have entered into, with the Service and JPA, an Implemen- tation Agreement (the "Implementation Agreement") in connection with an application for a Section 10(a) Permit (the "Section 10(a) Permit") which would allow the incidental taking of the SKR and its habitat within the HCP fee area (as described in the Short-Term HCP) subject to certain limitations and conditions as set forth in the Short-Term HCP and the Implementation Agreement; and WHEREAS, The County and Cities desire to obtain a permit from the Department to allow the taking of SKR and its habitat within the HCP fee area in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Short-Term HCP, the Implementation Agreement and this Agency Agreement and Permit; and WHEREAS, Section 2081 of the Fish and Game Code authorizes the Department, through permits or memorandums of understanding to authorize individuals and public agencies to take any endangered species, threatened species or candidate species for scientific, educational or management purposes. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and undertakings provided herein, and other considerations, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Department hereby grants to the County and the Cities a permit authorizing the taking of the SKR and its habitat within the HCP fee area in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Short-Term HCP and Implementation Agreement subject to the following modifications and conditions: A. The County and the Cities signatory to this Agreement, acting through the JPA will acquire off-site mitigation lands, protect such lands and provide for the long-term operation and maintenance of such mitigation habitat on an acre-by-acre PTSaO?/10/05/90/3/d -2- basis. The permittees acting through the JPA will acquire and protect one (1) acre of occupied habitat for each acre of occupied habitat taken as set forth in the Short-Term HCP and Implementation Agreement. "Occupied habitat" shall be that habitat as identified in the report Assessment of Population and Habitat Status (O'Farrell & Uptain) as modified by the Service's approved field surveys. B. This non-exclusive Agency Agreement and Permit shall be effective for two (2) years; however, in the event the signato- ries or their agents have not, in the judgement of the Department, fulfilled the terms of the Short-Term HCP and the Implementation Agreement as modified, the Department shall have the ability, after the end of the first six month reporting period to suspend or revoke this Agency Agreement and permit pursuant to the provisions of Section 1.L. hereof. In such event, the Department shall, at its option, reassign, revise, review or retain the permit authori- ty. C. The Department shall have a right of first refusal on all mitigation lands acquired or conveyed by the JPA within the San Jacinto Wildlife study area. Lands shall be offered under this paragraph at no cost to the Department and all lands shall be offered in fee to be conveyed to the Department through the Wildlife Conservation Board. The JPA shall reserve a portion of the ten percent (10%) O&M set aside for lands scheduled to be conveyed to the Department in the San Jacinto Study Area. At such -3- PTse0v / 10/0s/90/3/d time as the JPA transfers land to the Department pursuant to this paragraph, it shall also convey to it a portion of the ten percent (10%) operation and maintenance set-aside fund. The amount shall be the percentage represented by acres conveyed to the Department divided by 4,400 or the amount of acres acquired, whichever is greater, under the Short-Term HCP. D. The parties acknowledge that the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) has no provisions for "incidental take" as defined in federal law. For the purposes of this Agreement, all permit actions resulting in "incidental take" as provided for in both the Short-Term HCP and Implementation Agreement shall be evaluated consistent with the management objectives of the CESA. E. "Acquired" as replacement habitat shall mean for this Agreement any one of the following: (1) Ownership by the JPA, or its designee of a fee interest in occupied SKR habitat. Such interest shall be contin- gency-free and free of liens or mortgages. For purposes of calculation at the end of any accounting period as provided in the Short-Term HCP or Implementation Agreement, an Order of Immediate Possession authorizing the JPA to take immediate possession of occupied SKRHabitat pursuant to an action in eminent domain which action is being diligently pursued shall also be considered acquired. PTSSO7/10/O5/90/3/d -4- (2) easement in a form approved by occupied habitat. F. "Protected" shall following: Ownership of a perpetual wildlife conservation the Department over and upon mean for this Agreement the Fee title or a conservation interest approved by the Department in replacement habitat lands shall be vested in a public or private wildlife protection agency including the Service, the Department, the Nature Conservancy, or other entities approved by the Department and organized exclusively for management of biological resources. Such vesting shall be completed within two (2) years of the date of this Agreement. G. Any take of the SKR authorized by the Department pursuant to this Agreement and permit shall commence on the date hereof and shall automatically terminate and cease concurrently with the revocation or termination of the federal Section 10(a) Permit by the Service unless terminated or revoked pursuant to the terms hereof. H. All proposed modifications of the study areas and HCP boundaries shall, concurrently with submittal to the Service, be forwarded to the Department's Endangered Species Coordinator for review and approval. The Department shall complete its review and announce its decision no later than forty-five (45) days after the date of submittal. PTS807/10/05/90/3/d -5- I. This Agreement is intended to implement the provisions of the CESA (Fish and Game Code S 2050, et seq.). All violations of the California Fish and Game Code or its regulations are criminal misdemeanors unless otherwise provided. (Fish and Game Code S 12000). The parties intend to conform to the objectives of the Short-Term HCP and the Implementation Agreement insofar as those provisions are consistent with state law. The permittees, and individuals and entities authorized by them under this Agreement, will be authorized to take SKR and occupied habitat on the following basis for projects and activities as follows: (1) Projects subject to CEQA (Pub. Resources Code ~ 21000 et seq.) and sponsored by the permittees acting in their proprietary capacity. (2) Projects where the permittee or other public entity is a lead agency under CEQA and the environmental documents have been made available to the Department. (3) Ministerial projects located outside of the SKR study areas. (4) Projects categorically or statutorily exempt from the CEQA (Pub. Resources Code ~ 21000 et seq.) if those projects are located outside of study area. The permittees and private and public individuals and entities authorized by the permittees to take pursuant to this Agreement, including public agencies which act as lead agencies PTS807/10/05/90/3/d -6- pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will be authorized to take SKR and occupied habitat only after the public agency responsible therefor pursuant to the provisions of CEQA has complied with the provisions of CEQA. All individuals, corporations, public agencies and other entities "taking" occupied habitat under authority of the signatory agencies permit shall be responsible for compliance with CESA as provided for in this Agreement, which incorporates the Short-Term HCP and Implementation Agreement. The unauthorized taking of occupied habitat shall be deemed for the state law purposes to be take of individual animals consistent with federal case law authority (see Palilia v. Hawaii, (9th Cir. 1988) 852 F.2d 1106). In the event any permittee or other individual or entity has taken occupied habitat in contravention of this Agreement, the signatories to this Agreement will promptly take appropriate action to terminate the unlawful act and shall immediately notify the Department's Wildlife Protection Division and the District Attorney of Riverside County and shall fully cooperate with and assist the Department in any civil or criminal action taken against such permittee, individual or entity. J. In addition to any other requirements or obligations of the County, any City or the JPA under the Short-Term HCP or the Implementation Agreement in the event the County, any City or the JPA has knowledge that any person, firm or entity has disturbed or is disturbing any PTS807/10/05/90/3/d -7- occupied habitat within the HCP fee area without payment of the appropriate mitigation fee or otherwise in contravention of the terms of the CESA, the Short-Term HCP, the Implementation Agreement or this Agency Agreement and Permit, it will promptly take appropriate action to terminate the disturbance, or in the case where the disturbance has been completed, it will refuse, to the extent permitted by law, to issue any permits for the use or occupancy of the disturbed parcel until a mitigation fee has been paid or other appropriate action has been taken or mitigation has been provided. K. In addition to any other remedies set forth in the Short-Term HCP or the Implementation Agreement, the Department shall be empowered to exercise all legal and equitable remedies available to it to assure compliance with the terms of this Agency Agreement and Permit and shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, to audit the records of the JPA, the County or any City, and to revoke, terminate or suspend the right of any land owner or other person to enjoy or have the benefit of, the privileges granted under this Agency Agreement and Permit by terminating or suspending the right to take SKR and it's habitat pursuant hereto in the event of a taking of SKR habitat by any such land owner or other person in violation of the CESA and terms of the Agency Agreement and Permit. PTSS07/10/05/90/3/d -8- L. The Department shall be guided by the following terms in the suspension or revocation of any permit issued under this Agreement. 1. The permit to take occupied habitat may be revoked or suspended as to all permittees or as to any one signator to this Agreement. 2. The permit to take endangered species is a privilege and as such may not be vested as a property interest nor an entitlement subject to due process protections beyond those provided herein. 3. Prior to suspension or revocation of this permit, the Department shall provide notice to the JPA and the affected City or County of the facts or conduct which may warrant the suspension or revocation of the privileges granted under this Agency Agreement and Permit. Except as provided in subparagraph 4 hereof, in the event the JPA or any affected City or County has not demonstrated or achieved compliance with CESA, the regulations issued thereunder and this Agency Agreement and Permit within thirty (30) days after written notice, then, and in that event, the Department may revoke or suspend this Permit. 4. In the event that any permittee or any public or private individual or entity taking under the authority of any permittee takes occupied habitat in contravention of this Agency Agreement and Permit, in addition to its obligations set forth in Section 1.I. hereof, the permittee within whose jurisdiction such PTSe07/10/05/90/S/d -9- take occurs shall, within six (6) months after written notice from the Department, acquire and protect one (1) acre of occupied habitat for each acre of occupied habitat thus taken. In the event the permittee has not acquired the replacement habitat within six (6) months after written notice from the Department, the Department may suspend or revoke the privileges granted to such permittee under this Agency Agreement and Permit. M. This Agreement may be executed in any number of duplicate originals. N. Any amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be in writing shall be executed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date or dates set forth below and this Agreement shall become effective as of the date it is fully executed by all of the parties hereto. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DATED By COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATED By CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DATED By PTS807/10/05/90/3/d -10- CITY OF HEMET DATED By CITY OF PERRIS DATED By CITY OF MORENO VALLEY DATED By CITY OF RIVERSIDE DATED By CITY OF TEMECULA DATED By RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CON- SERVATION AGENCY DATED By PTS807/10/05/90/3/d -11- ITEM NO. 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER October 16, 1990 Personnel Policies and Procedures RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled Personnel Rules and Policies Resolution No. 90 - to Implement Chapter 2.60 of the Municipal Code Regarding the Establishment of a Personnel System DISCUSSION: In order to fully implement the provisions of our Personnel System Ordinance, the attached personnel rules and policies have been developed. In accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.60, Chapter 2.60.050, I am authorized to prepare and issue personnel rules and policies which do not involve a commitment of financial resources, subject to Council review. Further, those policies which do commit financial resources must be approved by the City Council. Accordingly, I am submitting all personnel rules and policies for your review. I believe and have been so advised by the City Attorney's office that the following policies involve a commitment of financial resources and thereby recommend the adoption of these policies by the Council: 2. 3. 4. 5. Acting Appointments (page 30) Comprehensive Annual Leave (page 33) * Holidays (page 36) Jury Duty (page 37) Overtime - Non Exempt Employees (page 46) All of the above policies have been separated from the rest of the rules and are included as part of the Resolution by which the Council will adopt them. I have attached this Resolution for your review. * Orignially adopted by Resolution 90-67, attacthed resolution will supercede RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL RULES AND POLICIES WHEREAS, Section 45001 of the California Government establishment of a personnel system by the legislative body of a City; Code allows for the WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula added Chapter 2.60 its Municipal Code, WHEREAS, personnel rules and policies necessary to implement Chapter 260 have been developed and the City has met and consulted with department heads and management staff concerning these rules; WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Section 2.60.050 of the City's Personnel System Ordinance, the City Council has reviewed and the City Manager has adopted certain personnel rules having no direct financial impact on the City; and WHEREAS, the City Manger has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt those rules and policies as identified below which involve a direct commitment of financial resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: SECTION 1. The following Personnel Rules and Policies have direct financial impact upon the City and are necessary to implement Chapter 2.60 of the Municipal Code: Jury Duty (Attachment F) Overtime Non Exempt Employees (Attachment) Wage Administration (Attachment H) Such policies are attached hereto this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. All prior resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. 3/Resosl08 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, on this 16th day of October, 1990. Ronald J. Paxks, Mayor ATTEST: David F. Dixon, City Clerk [SEAL] 3/Res6sl08 City of Temecula Personnel Policies October 9, ]990 City of Temecula Table of Contents Employment .................................................. Abandonment of Position ...................................... l Anniversary Dates ........................................... 2 Categories of Employment ..................................... 3 D~ug-Free Work Place ........................................ 6 Harassment ............................................... 14 Dual Employment ........................................... 17 Hours of Work - Non-exempt Employees ........................... 18 Nepotism ................................................ 19 Non-Discrimination ......................................... 21 Personnel Files ............................................ 22 Personnel Policies .......................................... 23 Probation Periods ........................................... 25 Recruitment .............................................. 26 Reference Checks .......................................... 29 Temporary Upgrade ......................................... 30 Attendance and Leaves ......................................... 31 Attendance - Non-exempt Employees ............................. 32 Comprehensive Annual Leave ................................... 33 Holidays ................................................. 36 Jury Duty ................................................ 37 Leave of Absence Without Pay .................................. 38 Military Leave ............................................. 41 Compensation ............................................... 42 Garnishments ............................................. 43 Insurance ................................................ 44 Overtime - Non-exempt Employees ............................... 45 Pay Periods and Pay Days ..................................... 46 Performance Reviews ........................................ 47 Wage Administration ........................................ 48 Discipline and Problem Solving .................................... 52 Discipline ................................................ 53 Problem Solving ............................................ 59 Miscellaneous ................................................ 60 Bulletin Boards ............................................ 61 Dress and Appearance ........................................ 62 Lay-off ................................................. 63 Management Rights ......................................... 64 Telephones ............................................... 66 Safety ..................................................... 67 Safety .................................................. 68 Smoking ................................................. 69 Uniforms ................................................ 70 Vehicles ................................................. 71 City of Temecula Employment Personnel Policies October 9, ]990 Subject: Abandonment of Position Related Policies: Leave of Absence Without Pay Background: Occasionally, an employee leaves a job without providing notice, or is unable to continue his employment and does not notify the employer. In such cases, the City needs to separate the employee from the City service. Policy: When in the opinion of the department head, an employee has abandoned his position, the department head shall notify the City Manager, or a designee. The City Manager, or a designee, shall notify the employee that the City has determined he has abandoned his position and that the employee has five (5) working days upon receipt of the notice to contact the City regarding his intent to return to work. Such notice shall be in writing and sent by certified mail or personal service to the last address listed in the employee's personnel records. 2. Abandonment of position may include, but is not limited to: a. situations where an employee fails to respond within five (5) working days to the notice of abandonment of position, b. where and employee fails to return to his employment upon conclusion of any authorized leave of absence, c. where an employee fails to properly notify by telephone or in writing his immediate supervisor of absence due to sickness or injury, where an employee fails to appear for work without notification or express agreement between the supervisor and the employee authorizing the use of any leave time set forth under the City's personnel policies, or, e. where an employee fails to keep his immediate supervisor informed of his disability status on a daily basis unless otherwise directed by his supervisor. 3. Abandonment of position shall constitute an automatic resignation from the City service. City of T~'~c~la - Personnel ~olicy - October 9, 1990 Sub iect: Anniversary Dates Related Policies: Performance Reviews Probation Period Wage Administration Policy: I. Service Anniversary Date: The service anniversary date for regular employees shall be the employee's first day of work with the City. Project Ernvlovees: If a project employee is transferred or promoted to a regular position, his/her service anniversary date shall be the first day of work as a regular employee with the City. Salary Anniversary Date: The salary anniversary date for regular employees shall be first calendar day following the completion of the employee's initial employment probation period. Promoted Ernvlovee: If an employee is promoted, his/her service anniversary date will remain unchanged. His/her salary review date will be based on the first day of employment in the new position [see Wage Administration]. City o~ Tsm~cula - Psrsonn~l Policy - October 9, lg90 2 Subiect: Categories of Employment Related Policies: Overtime Policy: For purposes of salary administration, employment and other personnel matters, it is necessary to classify employees and positions in certain categories. The tens which identify these categories are used throughout these policies. Wherever used, their meaning will be as follows: Probationary Employee - A new, employee who has been appointed to a regular full-time position and has not completed six {6} months of continuous service. The employment relationship can be terminated by the City or the employee at any time during the probation period for any reason. Promotional Probationary Employee - A regular full-time employee who has been promoted from one regular position to another with a higher maximum pay rate and has not completed six (6) months of continuous service in his/her new position. The employment relationship can be terminated by the City or the employee at any time during the promotional probation period for any reason. Regular Employee - An employee who is hired to perform duties, which under normal business conditions, are needed on an on-going basis as determined by the City. A regular employee may be scheduled to work full-time or part- time. The City reserves the right to determine the need for the services of regular employees. A regular employee is eligible for City sponsored benefits as specified in each appropriate personnel or insurance policy. d. Project Emolovee - An employee who is hired to work a specific period of time (ie., January l0 through February 6). Project employees are: i. scheduled at the convenience of the City, ii. net eligible for City sponsored benefits (ie., insurance) unless they are made eligible by a specific reference in these policies or with the specific written approval of the City Manager or the City Council, iii. to serve at the pleasure of the City Manager and may be terminated at any time with or without notice, and, City of T~necula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 3 Categories of Employment Page 2 iv. specifically excluded from the Discipline policy. Job Share Employee - An employee who has been designated to perform a portion of the duties or the work hours of a regular position. A job share employee is also a part-time employee. A job share employee is eligible for benefits as approved by the City Manager at the time of his/her appointment. A Job Share employee may be either a Regular or a Project employee. Full-time Employee - A probationary, regular, promotional probationary or project employee who is normally scheduled, but is not guaranteed, to work forty (40) hours per week. Full-time employees are scheduled at the convenience of the City. Part-time Employee - A probationary, regular, promotional probationary or project employee who is normally scheduled to work less than forty (40) hours per week. Part-time employees are scheduled at the convenience of the City. Management Employee - An employee who is designated by City Council Ordinance or Resolution to have responsibility for managing or directing a department or other major organizational unit, developing, implementing and administering City policies, and/or advising a manager of such a unit on significant policy issues. Suvervisory Emvlovee - An employee designated by the City Manager or a designee having authority, in the interest of the City, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgement. Employees whose duties are substantially similar to those of their subordinates shall not be considered to be supervisory employees. 4. Staff Eml)loyee - An employee who does not have on-going management or supervisory responsibilities. Exempt Ernvlovee - An employee who performs executive, administrative or professional tasks as defined by federal and state law. An exempt employee is not eligible for overtime compensation. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 4 Categories of Employment Page 3 Non-exempt Employee - An employee who does not perform executive, administrative or professional tasks as defined by federal and state law. A non- exempt employee receives overtime pay for work in excess of forty (40) hours of work in a week. A non-exempt employee must report all hours worked on a City approved time card (see Pay Periods and Pay Days policy). 7. A list of exempt and non-exempt positions is maintained in the Personnel Office. City of T~m~cula - P~rsonn~l Policy - O~b~r 9, 1990 5 Subject: Drug-Free Work Place BackEround: The City of Temecula shall maintain a drug-free work place through the measures set forth below. The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance by any employee in the work place is strictly prohibited. Policy: Substance abuse has been found to be a contributing factor to absenteeism, substandard performance, increased potential for accidents, poor morale and impaired public relations. It is the goal of the City, therefore, to eliminate substance abuse in the work place by clearly stating employee responsibilities relative to substance abuse and by providing managers and supervisors with guidelines and procedures for the detection of such abuse and the enforcement of rules relating thereto. It is the responsibility of City employees to cooperate in efforts to protect the life, personal safety and property of co-workers and fellow citizens. Employees shall, therefore, take all reasonable steps to abide by and cooperate in the implementation and enforcement of these policies and regulations. The City encourages employees who believe that they may have a drug or alcohol problem to seek counseling, assistance and/or rehabilitation, and will be supportive of those employees who voluntarily seek rehabilitation. However, the City will be equally firm in identifying and disciplining those employees who continue to be substance abusers and do not seek rehabilitation. Alcohol or drug abuse, including being under the influence, in the work place will not be tolerated, and disciplinary action, up to and including termination, will be used as necessary to achieve the goal of eliminating substance abuse in the work place. 1. Ernvloyee Re~nonsibilities An employee must: a. Not report to work while "under the influence of drugs or alcohol"; City oi~ T~cula - ~r~onn~l ~olicy - October 9, 1990 6 Drug-Free Work Place Page 2 NOTE: "Under the influence of drugs or alcohol" means: the use of any alcoholic beverage or any illegal drug or substance, or the misuse of any prescribed drug, in a manner and to a degree that impairs the employee's work performance or ability to use City property or equipment safely. Notify his/her supervisor, before beginning work, when taking any medications or drugs, prescription or nonprescription, which may interfere with the safe and effective performance of duties or operation of City equipment. Not possess or use alcohol or impairing drugs (illegal drugs and prescription drugs without a prescription) during working hours, rest periods, or at anytime while on City property; Not directly or through a third party sell or provide drugs or alcohol to any person, including any employee, while either employee or both employees are on duty; Immediately complete and sign a consent form (see drug testing prerequisite) and submit to an alcohol and drug test when requested to do so by the employee's Department Head or Supervisor. Provide within 24 hours of request bona fide verification of a current valid prescription for any potentially impairing drug or medication identified when a drug screen/test is positive. The prescription must be in the employee's name. Sign, if requested to do so by his/her Department Head or Supervisor, a "Last Chance Agreement" (as provided herein) as a condition of continued employment subsequent to entering a drug and/or alcohol treatment or rehabilitation program. h. Report any conviction under a criminal drug statute to the City Manager within five (5) days of such conviction. 2. Management Resoonsibilities a. Department Heads and Supervisors are responsible for enforcement of this policy. City of T~n~eula - P~r~onn~l Policy - October 9, 1990 7 Drug-Free Work Place Page 3 Department Heads and Supervisors may request that an employee submit to a drug and/or alcohol test in accordance with the guidelines for same set forth herein. Ce Whenever any Department Head or Supervisor encounters an employee who refuses to complete and sign a consent form (see drug testing prerequisites), or refuses an order to submit to a drug or alcohol test upon request, the Department Head or Supervisor shall remind the employee of the requirements and disciplinary consequences of this policy. Such refusal may be considered as insubordinate conduct and grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. de Where there is a "reasonable susDiCion' (as defined in Paragraph 4.c.ii.) that the employee is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the Department Head or Supervisor should arrange for the employee to be safely transported to his/her home. Department Heads and Supervisors shall not physically search the person of employees, nor shall they search the personal possessions of employees without the freely given consent of, and in the presence of, the City Manager and/or a designee. fs Department Heads and Supervisors shall notify the City Manager or a designee, whenever they have reasonable suspicion to believe that an employee may have illegal drugs in his or her possession or in an area not jointly or fully controlled by the City. If the City Manager, or his/her designee, concurs that there is reasonable suspicion of illegal drug possession, the City Manager, or a designee, shall notify the appropriate police agency. 3. Rehabilitation a. General: Employees who think that they may have a problem with drugs and/or alcohol are encouraged to seek assistance and rehabilitation. Voluntary Referral: A decision by an employee to voluntarily seek treatment or rehabilitation for the first time, will not be used as the basis for disciplinary action. However, the City may in such cases require such employees to comply with the provisions set forth herein pertaining to L.a$~; Chance Agreements and Follow-uo Testing. The City will not support a second rehabilitation effort. C'it, y of T~,ftscula - Personnel Pol'lcy - October 9, 1990 8 Drug-Free Work Place Page 4 c. Leave: If necessary, the employee will be granted a leave of absence without pay in order to accommodate treatment and rehabilitation. de Last Chance Agreements: Employees who undergo treatment and/or rehabilitation may be required to sign a "Last Chance Agreement" as a condition of continued employment. In said agreement, (see attached) the employee promises to complete the treatment or rehabilitation program and to comply with other terms stated therein. If the employee violates this agreement, he/she shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. Follow-up Testing: An employee entering a rehabilitation program may be required to submit to random testing for up to one year after completion of the program. If the employee fails to comply or if further substance abuse is detected upon such testing, the employee shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. 4. Drug Testing Guidelines Drug Testing Defined: Drug and/or alcohol tests may test for any substance which could impair an employee's ability to effectively and safely perform the functions of his/her job. b. Pre-emoloyment Physical Examinations: Required: All pre-employment physical examinations will include drug testing as defined herein. ii. Results: A positive result from a drug and/or alcohol analysis may result in the applicant not being hired where the applicant's use of drugs and/or alcohol could affect requisite job standards, duties or responsibilities. If a drug screen is positive at the pre-employment physical, the applicant must provide, within 24 hours of a request, bona fide verification of a valid current prescription for the drug identified in the drug screen. If the prescription is not in the applicant's name or the applicant does not provide acceptable verification, or if the drug is one that is likely to impair the applicant's ability to perform the job duties, the applicant may not be hired. City of T~nmcula - P~rsonn~l Policy - October 9, 1990 9 Drug-Free Work Place Page 5 c. During Emolovment Physical or Alcohol/Drug Tests: i. Cause: (a) An employee may be requested to submit to a drug and/or alcohol test when his/her Department Head or Supervisor has reasonable susoicion that an employee is intoxicated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol while on the job or subject to being called. (b) In addition, follow-up drug and/or alcohol testing related to rehabilitation (see Rehabilitation) may also be required. ii. Reasonable Suspicion Defined: "Reasonable Suspicion" is defined as a belief, based upon objective facts, sufficient to lead a reasonable prudent supervisor to suspect that an employee is under the influence of drugs or alcohol so that the employee's ability to perform the functions of the job is impaired or so that the employee's ability to perform his/her job safely is reduced. For example, any of the following, alone or in combination, may constitute reasonable suspicion: o Slurred speech; o Alcohol odor on breath; o Unsteady walking and movement; o An accident involving City property; o Physical altercation; o Verbal altercation; o Unusual behavior; o Possession of alcohol or drugs; o Information obtained from a reliable person with personal knowledge. 111. Documentation: Any Department Head or Supervisor requesting an employee to submit to a drug and/or alcohol test shall document, in writing, the facts constituting reasonable suspicion that the employee in question is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. City of Tsm~cula - ~rsonnel ~olicy - October 9, 1990 10 Drug-Free Work Place Page 6 iv. Prerequisite: Prior to the administration of any drug or alcohol testing, the Department Head or Supervisor shall first obtain from the employee to be tested a completed and signed consent form (attached). Said consent form shall provide for the employee's consent, in writing, to physical and psychological examination and testing. Results: If the drug screen is positive, the employee must provide, within 24 hours of request, bona fide verification of a valid current prescription for the drug identified in the drug screen. The prescription must be in the employee's name. Confidentialitv: Laboratory reports or test results shall not appear in an employee's general personnel folder. Information of this nature will be contained in a separate confidential medical folder that will be securely kept under the control of the Personnel Office. The reports or test results may be disclosed to the City Manager on a strictly need-to-know basis and to the tested employee upon request. Disclosures, without patient consent, may also occur when: The information is compelled by law or by judicial or administrative process; ii. The information has been placed at issue in a formal dispute between the employer an employee; iii. The information is to be used in administering an employee benefit plan; iv. The information is needed by medical personnel for the diagnosis or treatment of the patient who is unable to authorize disclosure. 5. Disciplinary Action - Disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, may be taken against an employee for any of the following reasons: a. Failure to comply with any of the Employee Responsibilities set forth her.in. b. Positive results from a drug and/or alcohol test. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 11 SAMPLE CONSENTFOR DRUG ANDALCOHOLTEST~G I hereby authorize to collect from me the following specimens and to conduct tests on such samples to determine the presence of alcohol, drugs, their metabolites, or other substances that violate the Policy on Drug and Alcohol Use. I hereby authorize Doctor to conduct a examination on me. Further, I consent to the release of the examination and/or test results to the City of Temecula administrative personnel for use in disciplinary actions or for other legitimate work related purposes. The City of Temecula may disclose the test results to for evaluation or consultation. This consent is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until I understand that I have a right to receive a copy of this authorization. I further understand that if I refuse to consent to such examination and/or tests or sign this form, I may be subject to disciplinary action, up to, and including termination of employment. CONSENT GIVEN: Employee's Name (print) Employee's Signature Date Witness' Name (print) Witness' Signature Date CONSENT REFUSED: Employee's Name (print) Explanation for Refusal: Employee's Signature Date Witness' Name (print) Witness' Signature Date City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 12 SAMPLE LAST CHANCE AGREEMENT I have received a copy of the City of Temecula's Policy on Substance Abuse, and I fully understand its provisions and acknowledge that compliance with the Policy is a condition of continued employment. I hereby acknowledge that I have entered or will enter a treatment or rehabilitation program for alcohol or drug abuse satisfactory to the City of Temecula. I agree to complete such program, perform the duties of my job in accordance with standards of performance reasonably expected, and comply with the City's rules, including the Policy on Substance Abuse. I agree to consent, for up to one year, to undergo physical or psychological examinations, and/or to random testing of my blood, urine, breath, or other body fluid specimens for alcohol, drugs, or their metabolites. I understand that a violation of said Policy or a breach of this agreement may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. City of Tem~cula - F~rsonnel ~oltcy - October 9, 1990 13 Subject: Harassment Reference: Title VII ~ Federal Civil Rights Act California Government Code Section 12900 et. seq. Problem Solving Procedure BackEround: Harassment in the work place is an unlawful practice. City employees are expected to conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Behavior or actions which result in, or establish an environment of harassment are to be strictly avoided. Policy: 1. The City is committed to providing a work environment which is free of discrimination. In keeping with this commitment, the City strictly prohibits harassment of any form, including sexual harassment. 2. Harassment includes, but is not limited to: a. Verbal harassment such as epithets, derogatory comments, or slurs; Physical harassment such as assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with normal work or movement directed at an individual; Visual forms of harassment such as derogatory posters, cartoons, or drawings; or, Sexual harassment such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, such as name calling, suggestive comments, or lewd talk and jokes, if: submission to such conduct is made, directly or indirectly, a term or condition of working for the City. ii. submission to or rejection of such conduct is the basis for employment decisions, or, City of Temscula - Psrsonnel Policy - Octobsr 9, 1990 14 Harassment Page 2 111. such conduct unreasonably interferes with the individual's work performance or has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. 1. If an employee believes that he or she is the victim of harassment, that employee should use the Problem Solving Procedure to report the incident. If the immediate supervisor is involved in the reported conduct, or, if for some reason the employee feels uncomfortable about making a report to that supervisor, the report may be made to the City Manager, or a designee. The City will investigate any report of harassment and will take whatever corrective action is deemed appropriate, including disciplining or discharging any individual who is believed to have violated this prohibition against harassment. The City does not tolerate harassment of any kind and will take disciplinary action whenever such harassment is demonstrated. Any individual who engages in conduct contrary to this policy may be personally liable in legal action brought against him or her. Any investigation related to a complaint under this policy will be conducted with confidentiality and respect for the rights of all individuals involved. Information related to the investigation will be provided on a need to know basis only. Any substantiated behavior which retaliates against any individual who seeks a review under this policy will be considered a violation of this policy and will result in serious disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination. City of Temacula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 15 SAMPLE MEMORANDUM IDatel To: All Employees From: City Manager Subject: Harassment Policy The City of Temecula is committed to providing a work environment which is dedicated to providing a full range of effective municipal services. In keeping with this commitment, the City maintains a strict policy prohibiting harassment in any form, including sexual harassment. Our policy prohibits harassment, including verbal, physical and visual acts, which may be offensive, intimidating, unwelcome, or reasonably interpreted as objectionable. Any City employee who believes he or she has been harassed by a co-worker, supervisor or agent of the City, or any non-employee who has reason to conduct business of any kind with the City, should promptly report the facts of the incident to his or her supervisor by using the Problem Solving Procedure. If for any reason the individual who desires to report the incident is uncomfortable using the Problem Solving Procedure, he or she may report it to or . All supervisors and managers are expected to report any incidents of alleged harassment to or The City will investigate all claims of harassment. Appropriate corrective action, including disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination, will be taken against individuals determined to have engaged in unlawful sexual harassment. If you have any questions regarding this policy, you may feel free to contact either or . City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 16 Sub iect: Dual Employment Background: As a public agency, the City must be particularly sensitive to real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest. The City expects all employees to adhere to the highest of ethical and professional standards. Because of their knowledge and expertise, outside employment or other income opportunities may become available to City employees. If an employee is considering such an opportunity, it is in the best interest of the City and the employee to fully disclose the opportunity to the City and to have it carefully reviewed to avoid a conflict of interest. Policy: Employees must notify their supervisor in writing if they are employed by any other employer, engaged in outside business on their own or with others, or involved in any other outside employment or other activity within the Temecula sphere of influence or which involves doing business with the City of Temecula which may present a real, potential or perceived conflict of interest with their City employment. The City Manager, or a designee, shall determine if a conflict exists. If a conflict of interest or scheduling problem exists, the City may require an employee to resign his/her other employment. 2. Employees may not use City equipment, supplies, materials or labor for their personal benefit or the benefit of others. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - Oc~ber 9, 1990 17 Subject: Hours of Work - Non-exempt Employees Related Policies: Overtime Pay Periods and Pay Days Standby Policy: 1. Rest periods (breaks) not to exceed fifteen minutes may be taken in approximately the middle of each four hours of scheduled work. a. Rest periods which are not taken by the employee may not be accumulated or taken at a later time. b. Rest periods may not be used to make up tardiness or to shorten the work day of an employee. Lunch breaks are provided for non-exempt employees scheduled to work at least five (5) hours in a day. Each supervisor will establish the time and length (minimum 1/2 hour) of lunch breaks for his/her employees. Employees who are eligible for lunch breaks are expected to take them. ae Working through a scheduled lunch break is considered paid time for a non- exempt employee. An employee who works through the lunch break without prior approval may be subject to disciplinary action. b. Breaks and lunches may not be taken at the employee's desk or in public areas. City o{ Tsmecula - Psr~onnsl Policy - 0ctobsr 9, 1990 18 Subject: Nepotism Related Policies: Non-Discrimination Recruitment Background: It is the City~s policy to recruit employees on the basis of open or promotional recruitments. Selection is based upon the qualifications of each candidate. Regardless of the intentions, the selection and appointment of an individual who is related to, or cohabitates with, a supervisor, a manager, or other City official creates an appearance of favoritism and/or a conflict of interest. Similarly, the marriage or cohabitation of two City employees who report to each other may create an appearance of favoritism or a conflict of interest. It is the intention of this policy to prevent such conflicts. Policy: Relatives and individuals who cohabitate with current City employees, City Council members, Commissioners or other City officials are not eligible for City positions where a potential conflict of interest or the potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale exists. If two employees marry or cohabitate, the City Manager, or a designee, will review the working relationship of the two employees and determine if the relationship creates a potential conflict of interest or an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale. If the City Manager, or a designee, determines that the relationship creates a potential conflict of interest or an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale, an effort will be made to transfer the least senior employee to a position where such a conflict or adverse impact does not exist. i. If an alternative position is not available, the affected City employees will be asked to decide which one will resign from their City position. ii. If neither employee elects to resign, the employee with the least seniority will be terminated. The affected employee may request a review of such a decision under the Problem Solving policy. City of Tsmscula - Psrsonn~l Policy - Octobsr 9, 1990 19 Nepotism Page 2 For purposes of this policy, relatives are defined as an employee's parents, child or step child, spouse, grandparents, brothers or step brothers, sisters or step sisters and in-laws. 4. For purposes of this policy, cohabitation is defined as two legally unrelated individuals who share a household. City of Tmmcula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 20 Sub iect: Non-Discrimination Policy: The City fully supports the concept of equal employment opportunity. All decisions relating to employment shall be made without regard to race, color, religion, age, national origin, ancestry, sex, marital status, medical condition or physical handicap, unless a bona fide occupational qualification exists. The personnel program will be administered to remove unnecessary and artificial barriers to the employment and promotion of women, members of minority groups and the handicapped. City o~ Temecula - Personnel Policy - Oc~cober 9, 1990 Subject: Personnel Files Policy: A Personnel file shall be maintained for each City employee. The file shall remain in the Personnel Office and shall contain all official records related to employment with the City for the employee. Personnel files may not be removed from the Personnel Office except by specific court order or subpoena except as authorized by the City Manager, or a designee. Personnel files are considered confidential· Controlling access to personnel files is the responsibility of the Personnel Office. The immediate supervisor and managers in the direct organizational line above the employee may review an employee's personnel file. A supervisor who is considering an employee for a promotion may review the personnel file of the employee. 3. An employee may request to review his/her personnel file during normal business hours. An employee who requests to see his/her personnel file during scheduled work time, must have the permission of his/her supervisor to leave his/her work station. b. A representative of the Personnel Office, or a designee, must be present during the review of the file. Under no circumstances, may an individual authorized to review a personnel file remove any documents within the file. If the employee or a supervisor believes a document should be removed from a personnel file, he/she shall make a request to the City Manager, or a designee. The City Manager, or a designee, shall determine if the document(s) is to be removed. 5. The Personnel Office shall determine the appropriateness of documents to be placed in Personnel files. 6. Personnel files shall be maintained for five (5) years following the termination of an employee. 7. Documents related to the Problem Solving Procedure shall be maintained in a separate file as determined by the Personnel Office. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 22 Subject: Personnel Policies Background: The City's personnel system is designed to support the delivery of efficient and effective municipal services. Personnel policies are an important component in the personnel system. They establish the guidelines we follow in making personnel related decisions. Personnel policies are maintained and updated by the Personnel Office. Personnel policies may be changed from time to time to reflect changes in the organization or new state and federal laws. Each supervisor and manager is expected to be familiar with and understand our personnel policies. Policy: New or Revised Personnel Policies: The City Manager, or a designee, is responsible for establishing, reviewing and updating Personnel Policies. All proposed Personnel policies must be reviewed and approved by the City Manager. The City Manager will be responsible for determining the need for administrative review of proposed policies. The City Manager, or a designee, shall determine the content of all Personnel policies. Administrative policies which affect the day to day operation of City programs are not covered by this policy· 2. Policy Format: Personnel policies will be printed and distributed as determined by the City Manager. The format for Personnel policies shall be as follows: SUBJECT: This is the name for each policy statement. Subject headings are selected to use words and terms which are used on a daily basis by City employees. RELATED POLICIES (or REFERENCES): (Optional Section) This section lists laws, regulations or other City policies which relate to the policy subject. By including such references, the policy reader is encouraged to consider all related information before making a final decision on the question at hand. BACKGROUND: (Optional Section) The background statement provides an opportunity to introduce the subject to the guidebook user. It is intended to provide additional information which is not necessarily appropriate to the policy statement. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 23 Personnel Policies Page 2 POLICY: The purpose of the policy statement is to define organizationally approved guidelines for resolving personnel related questions. PROCFnURE: (Optional Section) Some policies also involve specific steps to be followed in administering the personnel system. This section is used to provide appropriate instructions in such instances. 3. Aovlication: Personnel policies will apply to all City staff unless a specific written exception is made to the contrary. 4. ADoroyal: The City Manager will sign or initial all approved Personnel policies prior to distribution. City Council APProval: The City Manager or a designee, will determine whether new or revised personnel policies require the approval of the City Council, except any policy changes which have an economic impact shall be presented to the City Council. City of Tsmscula - P~rsonnel Policy - October 9, 1990 24 Subject: Probation Periods Related Policies: Discipline Employment Categories Insurance Performance Review Wage Administration Policy: Probationary Emvlovees: All new and rehired employees will serve a probationary period for the first six (6) months of continuous employment. During this period, the employee's Department Head, manager and/or supervisor and the employee will have an opportunity to determine whether continued employment is appropriate. Extension: The City Manager, or a designee, may extend the probationary period for up to three (3) months if, in his/her sole discretion, he/she determines that such an extension is appropriate. The employment relationship can be terminated by the DeparUnent Head, manager and/or supervisor, or the employee, at any time during the probation period for any reason. 3. Emolovment Rights: A new or rehired employee is not vested in any employment rights and is not eligible for any rights under the City's Discipline procedure. Performance Reviews: A probationary employee is eligible to receive a performance review at or near the completion of three {3) months and six {6) months of continuous employment {see Performance Review policy). Rejection: The City Manager, or a designee, may reject a probationary employee at any time during the probation period. The employee shall be notified of his/her rejection in writing. PROMOTIONAL PROBATION: An employee who is promoted shall serve a six (6) month promotional probation period· A PROMOTED EMPLOYEE WHO DOES NOT MEET THE PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS OF HIS/HF_~ NEW POSITION MAY BE RF-!-FASED FROM HIS/HER EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CITY WITHOUT RIGHT OF APPEAL. a. The City may, at its sole discretion, extend the promotional probation period for up to three months. City of Te~ecula - Personnel Policy - October 9. 1990 25 Subject: Recruitment Related Policies: Categories of Employment Drug Free Work Place Dual Employment Nepotism Non-Discrimination Reference Checks Wage Administration Background: The City's goal is to hire the most qualified employees for City positions. The City expects to hire people based upon their ability to do the work which is assigned to the position for which they are being considered. In order to be sure that an employee is hired properly, it is necessary for each supervisor to follow a series of steps before making a job offer or allowing the employee to start to work. Policy: Personnel ReQuisition: When a vacancy is created the supervisor who wants to fill the position must complete a Personnel Requisition. Before completing the requisition, the requesting supervisor should review the class specification for the open job title and note any special duties which will be assigned to the open position. The Personnel Requisition must be approved by the DeparUnent Head and the City Manager, or a designee. Announcements: The City Manager, or a designee, is responsible for determining the most appropriate method of announcing the opening and soliciting applicants. The requesting supervisor should discuss the need for advertising with the City Manager, or a designee. Job announcements, employment ads and advertising sources must be approved by the City Manager, or a designee. ErnDloYrnent ADDliCatiOnS: All employment applications will be received in the Personnel Office. Each application will be date stamped and filed. The City Manager, or a designee, will be responsible for establishing the steps to be followed in reviewing applications and selecting candidates for interview or testing for each recruitment. All applicants must complete an employment application. City o'F T.,~o~__,la - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 26 Recruitment Page 2 Testing: Interviews and tests will be job related. Job related means that any questions or tests given to the applicant will be designed to determine whether they can perform the typical duties of the position. Non job related questions and tests are not permitted. The City reserves the right to determine the need for, method, type and number of tests for each available position. The City reserves the right to determine the weight which is given to each test in determining the qualifications of candidates. Final Candidates: Final candidates and candidates selected for appointment will be selected from the applicant pool in accordance with procedures established by the City Manager, or a designee. 6. Terminating a Recruitment: The City Manager, or a designee, may terminate any recruitment, test or examination at any time for any reason. 7. Reference Checks: All background checks and job offers shall be made by the City Manager, or a designee. 8. New Employees: A new employee may not start work unless all of the following steps are completed: a. Completed employment application b. Completed W-4 c. Completed I-9 (immigration) d. Oath of Allegiance e. Driver~s License (if required) f. Department of Motor Vehicles Report g. Certificates and Diplomas (if required) h. Work Permit (if under 18) i. Satisfactory Department of Justice report (if required) j. A physical examination by a City authorized physician (if required) 9. The employee must be given the following information: a. An Employee Handbook (when available) b. Personnel Action Form 10. Personnel Action Form: Once an applicant is selected to be employed, the Personnel Office will complete a personnel action form for approval by the Department Head and the City Manager, or a designee. A new employee may not start working unless this procedure is completed. City of Tsmscula - Psrsonnsl Policy - Oc%obsr 9, 1990 Recruitment Page 3 11. Physical Examination: If the applicant is to be placed in a position which requires a physical examination, the applicant shall be told that any job offer is contingent upon him/her passing the physical examination. Such individuals may not start work without successfully passing the physical examination. 12. The City reserves the right to require all applicants to submit to a drug test. City o'~ Temscula - ~er$onnel ~olicy - October 9, 1990 28 All requests for reference checks shall be directed to the Personnel Office. Subject: Reference Checks Policy: 1. 2. The Personnel Office will confirm only factual information related to the employee's employment with the City. The information which will be confirmed shall consist of: a. Dates of employment b. Position titles c. Rates of pay City of T~m~cula - ~r~onr~l Policy - Octo~r 9, 1990 Subject: Temporary Upgrade Related Policies: Recruitment Background: As a result of vacancies, leave of absence or for other reasons, it may be necessary to reassign the duties of an authorized position to another employee. When such assignmenLs require the employee to assume significant additional duties, for an extended time period, which are outside the scope of his/her regular assignment, it may be appropriate to adjust the employee's salary to reflect the interim changes. This policy allows the City to temporarily upgrade the affected employee. Policy: APProval Reeuired: With the approval of the City Manager, or a designee, an employee may be temporarily appointed to a higher level classification to perform additional duties on an interim basis provided that: as the higher level position is vacant as a result of a retirement, termination, leave of absence, promotion, a new vacant position, or an extended vacation, and, the duties of the higher level position are clearly outside of the scope of the employee's current classification as determined by the City Manager, or a designee, and, c. the vacancy is expected to continue for at least 30 calendar days, but not longer than one (1) year. Salary: The salary of an employee in a Temporary Upgrade Assignment shall be adjusted by 5.0% or to the minimum rate of the temporary classification, whichever is greater, for the period of She Temporary Upgrade Assignment. At the discretion of the City Manager, or a designee, a higher salary rate may be established for a Temporary Upgrade assignment. 3. Effective Dates: The City Manager, or a designee, shall establish the effective dates of a Temporary Upgrade appointment. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 30 City of Temecula Attendance and Leaves Personnel Policies October 9, 1990 Subject: Attendance - Non-exempt Employees Related Policies: Discipline Comprehensive Annual Leave Policy: 1. ReoortinE to Work: Each non-exempt employee is expected to report to work and to be prepared to work at the start of each work shift he/she is scheduled to work. Absence: If a non-exempt employee is unable to report to work for any reason, he/she must call his/her supervisor within 30 minutes of his/her scheduled start time. The employee must tell his/her supervisor why he/she will not be able to report to work and when he/she does expect to return to work. If the supervisor is not available, the employee must provide the required information by calling his/her Department Head or the Personnel Office. 3. Tardiness: Non-exempt employees must notify their supervisor within 30 minutes of their scheduled starting time, if they will be unable to report to work on time. a, If a non-exempt employee notifies his/her supervisor within thirty (30) minutes of his/her scheduled start time that he/she will be late to work, the tardiness may be charged to Comprehensive Annual Leave in increments of fifteen {15) minutes. b, Except in a bona fide emergency, if a non-exempt employee does not call in within 30 minutes of his/her scheduled start time, to report that he/she will be unable to report to work, the absence will not be compensated or charged to Comprehensive Annual Leave. c. When a non-exempt employee is tardy, the supervisor will determine the time at which the employee may begin working. Discinline: A non-exempt employee may be disciplined for absenteeism or tardiness which affects the employee's ability to perform his/her assigned duties; interferes with the efficient or effective operation of City programs, or; establishes a pattern of abuse or neglect. City otr Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 32 Subiect: Comprehensive Annual Leave Related Policies: Attendance Holidays Leave of Absence Without Pay The City provides Comprehensive Annual Leave credits to eligible employees. Comprehensive Annual Leave credits provide employees with paid time off for rest and relaxation, personal or family illness, and personal business. In most cases, the City expechs employees to request time off in advance. In all cases, employees must request the time off from their supervisor, or if the supervisor is not available, their Department Head or the Personnel Office. An employee who is frequently absent without the prior approval of his/her supervisor, may create unnecessary scheduling difficulties for the City. Employees may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal for excessive absenteeism. POlicy: 1. EligibilitY: Probationary, promotional probationary and regular employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits from the date of hire. a. Project employees do not earn Comprehensive Annual Leave Credits. Accrual Rate - Probationary. Regular Staff Emolovees: Probationary and regular full-time staff employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Accruals per Approximate Pay Period Anraml Accrual First day of employment through year 1 Beginning year 2 Beginning year 4 Beginning year 6 Beginning year 8 Beginning year 10 and thereafter 4.616 hours 15 days 5.231 hours 17 days 6.769 hours 22 days 7.384 hours 24 days 8.000 hours 26 days 8.923 hours 29 days Probationary, regular full-time and regular part-time employees who are paid for less than eighty (80) hours in a pay period will earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits on a pro-rated basis for that pay period. City of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 33 Comprehensive Annual Leave Page 2 Accrual Rate - Regular. Management and Suoezvisorv Full-Time Emvlovees: Probationary and regular full-time staff employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Accruals per Pay Period Approximate Annual Accrual First day of employment through year 1 Beginning year 2 Beginning year 4 Beginning year 6 Beginning year 8 Beginning year 10 and thereafter 5.847 hours 19 days 6.462 hours 21 days 8.000 hours 26 days 8.616 hours 28 days 9.231 hours 30 days 10.154 hours 33 days Probationary and regular full-time employees who are paid for less than eighty {80) hours in a pay period will earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits on a pro-rated basis for that pay period. Accrual Rate - Part-Time Employees: Probationary and regular part-time employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits in accordance with the schedule shown in paragraph 2 above on a pro-rata basis in increments of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% (ie., an employee who normally works 20% of a 40 hour week would accrue 25% of the CAL credits of a regular full-time employee). Use Before Credits are Earned: An employee may not use Comprehensive Annual Leave credits before they are earned except as provided in Paragraph 4 above. a. Normally, employees are expected to schedule Comprehensive Annual Leave time off in advance with their supervisor. be In an urgent or emergent situation, an employee may request Comprehensive Annual Leave time off on an unscheduled basis by calling his/her supervisor within the first thirty minutes of his/her scheduled start time (see Attendance policy). c. Excessive unscheduled time off whether compensated by Comprehensive Annual Leave or not, may result in discipline up to and including termination. C"lty of Temscula - I~rsonnel Policy - October 9, 1990 34 Cornpreheusive AJ~ual Leave Page 3 Maximum Accrual: At any given time, an employee may not have a Comprehensive Annual Leave balance of more than two times (2x) his/her annual accrual rate. The City may schedule employees to take Comprehensive Annual Leave time off to satisfy this requirement. The City may, at its option, buy back unused Comprehensive Annual Leave credits once each calendar year. 8. Minimum Charge: The minimum charge to Comprehensive Annual Leave credits is fifteen (15) minutes. Holidays: If a holiday falls within a time period when the employee is using Comprehensive Annual Leave credits, the holiday will not be charged to Comprehensive Annual Leave [see Holiday policy]. I0. Leave of Absence Without Pay: An employee who is on a Leave of Absence Without Pay will not accrue Comprehensive Annual Leave credits. At the City's discretion, an employee may be required to exhaust all Comprehensive Annual Leave credits before the employee is granted a Leave of Absence Without Pay. 11. Te,,'mination Pay=off: All accrued Comprehensive Annual Leave credits will be paid at the employee's regular rate of pay at the time of termination, death or retirement. Ctty of Tm~cula - Pmrmonrml Policy - 0~bwr 9, 1990 35 Subiect: Holidays policy: 1. The City observes the following holidays: New Year's Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday President's Day Memorial Day July 4th Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Friday after Thanksgiving Christmas Day Observance: Holidays which fall on a Saturday will normally be observed on the preceding Friday. Holidays which fall on a Sunday will normally be observed on the following Monday. The City Manager will determine the actual dates holidays will be observed each year. Eligibility: Regular full-time and part-time employees who are eligible for holiday pay and are on paid status for their entire regular work shift immediately prior to and immediately following the holiday will be paid for the holiday. a. Project employees are not eligible for holiday pay except as specifically authorized by the City Manager. 4. Compensation: as Regular full-time employees who are eligible for holiday pay receive eight hours holiday pay on a City observed holiday. Regular part-time employees who are eligible for holiday pay receive holiday pay for the hours that they would have normally been scheduled to work had the day not been a holiday. Work on a Holiday: If a regular non-exempt employee who is not scheduled to work on a holiday, is required to work on a holiday, he/she will be paid for the actual hours of work at the rate of one and one half times his/her regular rate. In addition, the employee will be paid holiday pay as explained in Paragraph 4.a. and b. above or be given equivalent holiday time off one another day as determined by the City. C~ty of Tsmscu]a - las~so~nsl Policy - October 9, 1990 Subiect: Jury Duty Policy: Employees may attend jury duty in accordance with their legal obligations to do so. An employee who is summoned to jury duty will be placed on a paid leave of absence for up to 30 calendar days. If the employee is required to serve for more than 90 calendar days, he/she will be placed on a Leave of Absence Without Pay. Upon receipt of payment from the court, the employee must provide a copy of the payment check stub to the City. The jury service fees (not including mileage) will be deducted from the employees pay in a subsequent pay period. City of T~culm - ~rsonn~l F~ltcy - October 9, 1990 37 Subject: Leave of Absence Without Pay Reference: Abandonment Policy Comprehensive Annual Leave Policy Employee Benefit Plans {ie., medical insurance, PERS, etc.) The City expects employees to be at work on days that they are scheduled to work. The City provides a generous Comprehensive Annual Leave {CAL} policy for regular employees. These credits are intended to provide employees with paid time off to deal with personal issues or needs. However, the City also recognizes that an employee may occasionally encounter a personal situation which requires additional time away from the job for which the employee has not accrued enough CAL credits. Therefore, employees may request a Leave of Absence Without Pay. Generally, such requests fall into one of three categories: medical, maternity or personal. The City deals with each type of request separately. Policy: GENERAL PROVISIONS: 1. The following provisions apply to a Leave of Absence Without Pay, regardless of the reason for the leave: a. Comprehensive Annual Leave Credits will not accrue during a Leave of Absence Without Pay. b. All requests for a Leave of Absence Without Pay must be submitted in writing. An employee who is granted a Leave of Absence Without Pay and does not return to work on the first regularly scheduled day of work following the completion of the approved leave may be terminated (see Abandonment Policy). d. All Leaves of Absence Without Pay of more than thirty (30) days will result in an adjustment to the employees service anniversary date. e. A Leave of Absence Without Pay in excess of five (5) days must be approved by the City Manager. C~t~ of T~cula ~ Ptrtonnel Pol~c~ - October 9, 1990 38 Leave of Absence Without Pay Page 2 MEDICAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: 1. An employee who is medically disabled may be granted a Medical Leave of Absence Without Pay for up to one year. a. Medically disabled means unable to perform assigned work duties as determined by a licensed medical practitioner. b. The City Manager, or a designee, may require, at City expense, that the employee submit to an examination by a City selected physician. If the employee is unable to return to work at the completion of the Medical Leave of Absence Without Pay, he/she may request a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay. a. The granting of a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay is at the discretion of the City Manager, or a designee. The City will continue to pay its share of the cost of insurance premiums for the employee and dependents for up to the first four months when an employee is on an approved Medical Leave of Absence. An employee who is granted a Medical Leave of Absence Without Pay for other than maternity reasons will be returned to their previous position or an equivalent position at the discretion of the City Manager, or a designee. MATERNITY I/AVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: 1. All of the provisions of a Medical Leave of Absence Without Pay shall apply to a Maternity Leave of Absence Without Pay for medical reasons except as follows: Unless her position has been abolished, an employee who is on a Maternity Leave of Absence for medical reasons, will be returned to her original position at the completion of a Maternity Leave of Absence Without Pay. (continued on next page) C~ty of Tsmscu~a - PsPsonnsl Policy - ~r 9, ~990 39 Leave of Abseace Without Pay Page 3 PERSONAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: 1. An employee who has completed at least one year of continuous service may request a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay for up to one year. a. The approval of a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay will be at the sole discretion of the City Manager, or a designee. An employee who is granted a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay must use all accrued Comprehensive Annual Leave credits before being placed on unpaid status. C, After exhausting his/her Comprehensive Annual Leave credits the employee shall be responsible for the entire cost of insurance premiums for the employee and any dependents. An employee who is granted a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay and desires to return prior to the expiration of the approved leave may request, in writing, permission to return earlier. ae The approval of a request to return prior to the expiration of a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay shall be at the sole discretion of the City Manager, or a designee. An employee who is granted a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay will be returned to their previous position or an equivalent position at the discretion of the City Manager, or a designee, provided that such a position is available at or near the time the employee is scheduled to return. as An employee may be placed on lay-off status or terminated depending upon the needs of the City during the come of a Personal Leave of Absence Without Pay. City o{ Te~ecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 40 Subject: Military Leave Policy: An employee who enters the armed forces of the United States will be placed on an extended leave of absence without pay in accordance with applicable federal or state laws. Upon completion of military service, the employee will be reinstated with full seniority to his/her former position or to a comparable position if application for reemployment is made within 90 calendar days of release from the service or related hospitalization· An employee who is a member of the National Guard or of a reserve component of the armed forces shall, upon furnishing a copy of the official orders or instructions, be granted a military training leave. Training leaves will not, except in an emergency, or in event of extenuating circumstances, exceed two weeks per year, plus reasonable travel time. Upon presentation of a military pay voucher, employees will be reimbursed for the difference between their normal compensation and the pay they received while on military duty. C4t~ o~ Tsmscuqa - PsPaonnsl Po14c~ - October 9, 1990 4 1 City of Temecula Compensat;ion Personnel Policies October 9, 1990 Subiect: Garnlshmen~ Policy: City employees are expected to maintain their personal and private affairs in such a manner so as not to involve the City. This includes employee's financial affairs, which should be maintained in such a manner that salary liens or garnishments are not habitual. Three (3) or more salary liens or garnishments from separate sources within a (12) twelve-month period may be grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination. C~ty of Tamecuba - Pertoenel Policy -Oct, ober 9, lggO 43 Subiect: Insurance Related Policies/References: Categories of Employment Insurance policies Policy: Fixed Monthly Contribution to Emvlovee Benefits: Beginning on the first calendar day of the month following the completion of a full calendar month of service, probationary, regular full-time and regular part-time employees are eligible for the City's Fixed Monthly con~ibution to Employee Benefits as follows: as Probationary and Reimlar Full-time Emvlovees - Probationary and regular full-time employees are eligible to receive a Fixed Monthly Contribution to Employee Benefits as provided in Schedule A of the City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan to be used for purchasing City sponsored insurance benefits. be Probationary and Regular Part-time Employees - Probationary and regular part-time employees who regularly work 30 or more hours per week are eligible to receive a pro-rata share of the Fixed Monthly Contribution to Employee Benefits as provided in Schedule A of the City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan to be used for purchasing City sponsored insurance benefits. Available Insurance - Probationary and Regular Employees - Eligible Probationary and Regular employees may purchase insurance coverage in accordance with the provisions of Schedule A-I of the City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan. Soecific Insurance Coverages: The City reserves the right to change insurance carriers or plans at its option. Specific insurance policy provisions or coverages are contained in the policy document for the given plan. Questions regarding insurance policy provisions or coverages should be referred to the insurance carrier. Continuation of Insurance Benefits After Termination: Employees and their eligible dependents may continue insurance coverage at their own expense in accordance with applicable state and federal laws and insurance policy provisions. 4. Workerrs Comoensation - All employees are covered by Worker's Compensation insurance. Ctty of Tsmscu]a - Personnel Po]tc), - October 9, 1990 44 Subject: 0vertlrne - Non-exempt Fmployees Related Policies: Categories of Employment Hours of Work Pay Days and Pay Periods The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) reauires that work performed by non-exempt employees in excess of forty hours in a seven day work period be paid at the rate of time and one half the employeets regular rate of pay. Whether an employee is exempt (salaried) or non-exempt (hourly) is determined by the type of duties they perform. Exempt and non- exempt status is determined by the Personnel Office. Policy: EliLribilitY: Non-exempt employees receive overtime pay at the rate of one and one half times their regular rate of pay after forty {40) hours work in a seven {7) day work week. Work Week Defined: For the purpose of computing overtime, the workweek for all employees is a seven day period beginning at 12:01 a.m. on each Saturday and ending at midnight on each Friday night· b. Exempt employees are not eligible for overtime pay. 2. Time Worked: For purposes of this policy, hours worked includes only those hours in which the employee performs services authorized by the City. Time Paid but ~ot Worked: Holidays, Comprehensive Annual Leave, Jury Duty, Compensatory Time Off and Leave With Pay are n91; considered time worked for purposes of this policy. 4. Authorization: All overtime work must be approved in advance by the employee's supervisor or a management employee. C~ty of T~$cu]a - Psr$onr$] Poltcy- October 9, 1990 45 Subject: Pay Periods and Pay Days Related Policies: Categories of Employment Hours of Work Overtime PolicY: Work Week Defined: For the purpose of computing overtime, the workweek for all employees is a seven day period beginning at 12:01 a.m. on each Saturday and ending at midnight on each Friday night. 2. Pay periods include a fourteen (14) day period beginning on Saturday and ending on Friday. 3. RecordinE Time Worked: ae Non-exempt employees must record their starting and ending time on an approved City form as required. Employees shall not make an entry on another employee's time report for any reason. Corrections to time reports can be made only by the employee's immediate supervisor. All corrections must bear the initials of the person authorizing the correction. ii. Tampering with any time reports may result in discipline, up to and including termination. b. Exempt employees complete a weekly time report showing total hours worked and hours charged to Comprehensive Annual Leave or other leave categories. Pay day is every other Thursday following the final Friday in the pay period. If a holiday falls on a pay day, pay day will be the first working day prior to the holiday. The Personnel Office will post a list of pay days at the beginning of each calendar year. Pay checJKs will be given only to the employee unless the employee provides a written and signed note allowing the Personnel Office to give the check to another individual, or, personally calls the Personnel Office and is clearly recoEnized over the telephone to request that the pay check be given to another individual. Revtsed Au~us~ 20, q990 City o~ Tsmscula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 46 Subiect: Performance Reviews Related Policies: Probation Period Wage Administration The City's Performance Review system provides a formal, periodic review of the performance of each employee in relationship to the performance of expectations of his/her supervisor. Policy: Relationshio to Merit Increases: The completion of a Performance Review does not automatically entitle the employee to a merit increase. Merit increases are based upon the overall performance contributions of an employee to the continued efficiency and effectiveness of services delivered to City residents. Each supervisor is responsible for determining the eligibility of each employee under his/her supervision for a merit increase in accordance with the Wage Administration policy. 2. Eliiribilit~: Each employee is eligible for a Performance Review at or near the completion of the first 3 months of continuous employment and at or near the completion of six months of continuous service and at least annually, at or near the employee's anniversary date thereafter. A promoted employee is eligible for a Performance Review at or near the completion at or near the completion of three months of continuous employment in his/her new position and at least annually, at or near the anniversary date of the employee's promotion thereafter. Performance Reviews will be written on the Performance Review form designated by the Personnel Office. A copy of each completed Performance Review shall be forwarded to the Personnel Office for the employee's Personnel file. The employee shall be given a copy of the completed performance review. City of T~lm - ~r~n~l ~oltcy - Oc~r 9, 1990 Subject: Wage Adminigtration Related Policies: Performance Reviews The City offers competitive salaries for duties performed by City employees. The ability of the City to pay wages is based upon the continued efficient and effective delivery of services and available revenues. While each approved classification title has an approved salary range, the actual salary of each employee within the salary range, is based upon his/her performance of assigned duties. POlicy: 1. Salar~ RanEes: Each approved classification title will have an approved salary range assigned to it. The minimum rate of the salary range will represent the normal starting pay rate for an employee who is just beginning to perform the duties of the position. The maximum rate of the salary range will represent the maximum value of work performed in the classification. The salary of an employee may not exceed the maximum pay rate for his/her classification unless the employee has been Y-Rated as explained below. c. The actual pay rate for each employee will be based upon a review of his/her performance in relationship to the expectations of his/her supervisor. d. Recommended adjustments to salary ranges must be submitted to the City Council for review and approval. Pay Rates: Each employee will be assigned to an approved classification title and a specific pay rate within the approved salary range for the classification. The City Manager, or a designee, may approve a starting salary for a new or returning employee at any rate within the salary range. Ctt~ of Twmsculm - Pw~lonnel Policy - (~r 9, 1990 Wage Adminlsu'aUon Page 2 EligibiliW for Merit Adiustments - Regular EmploYees: Each probationary or regular employee will be considered for, but is not guaranteed, a merit adjustment as follows: At or near the successful completion of the first six (6) months of continuous calendar days of service and annually at or near the employees anniversary date thereafter, provided that the employee is not on promotional probation, Y-rated or at the maximum rate for his/her salary range. Elizibilitv for Merit Adiustments - Promoted Emolovees: A promoted regular employee will be considered for, but is not guaranteed, a merit adjustment as follows: At or near the successful completion of the employee's promotional probation period provided that the employee is not Y-rated or at the maximum rate for his/her salary range. b. If the employee's anniversary date falls within the promotional probation period, he/she will not be eligible for a merit increase. After completing the promotional probation period, the employee will be eligible for, but is guaranteed, a merit increase at or near his/her next anniversary date and annually at or near the employees anniversary date thereafter provided that the employee is not on promotional probation, Y- rated or at the maximum rate for his/her salary range. 5. Effective Dates: Merit increases shall become effective on the first day of the first pay period following their final approval by the City Manager. 6. Merit Adtustment Guidelines: The following table shall be used as a guide for the City Manager, or a designee, in approving merit salary adjustments: Performance Ratin~ Merit Potential* Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations 0, 1/2, 1, or I 1/2 steps 0, 1/2, or I step 0 or 1/2 step Except 4n the use of a Y-Rate, an smp]oy~ my not exceed the maxtmum salary range rate for hts/her c]ass~flca~ton. C~ty of Tsmscula - Pmrmonnsl Policy - October 9, 1990 49 Wage Admlnisu'at. lon Page 3 Merit increases are not automatic. At or near the potential effective date of a merit adjustment for each employee, his/her supervisor shall make a recommendation as to whether the employee shall receive a merit adjustment, be denied a merit adjustment or be deferred for consideration of a merit adjustment. All merit adjustment recommendations must be accompanied by a completed performance review, a Personnel Action form and be approved by the Department Head and the City Manager, or a designee. b. Project employees are not eligible for merit increases except under special circumstances approved by the City Manager, or a designee. ComPetitive Wage Adjustment: Annually, the City Manager will review the approved salary ranges for benchmark positions in relationship to salaries paid by other agencies for similar work. In addition, the analysis shall include consideration of the City's financial condition, difficulties in recruiting qualified staff and the City's experience in retaining qualified staff in the previous year. The City Manager shall recommend any appropriate adjustments to salary ranges to the City Council. If an employee's range is adjusted, the employee's salary will be adjusted by the amount of the range adjustment. Promotion: An employee who is promoted to a position which has a maximum pay rate which is higher than the maximum pay rate for the employeeIs current position, will be placed at either the minimum rate for the new classification or at a rate which is approximately 5% higher than the employeels current pay rate, whichever Demotion: An employee who is demoted, or voluntarily requests a demotion, to a position which has a lower maximum pay rate than the maximum pay rate for the employee's curTent position, will be placed at a pay rate within the new salary range at the discretion of the City Manager, or a designee. 10. Reclas$1fication: An employee who is reclassified to a position which has a maximum pay rate which is higher than the maximum pay rate for the employeels current position, will be placed by the City Manager, or a designee, at either the minimum rate for the new classification or at a rate which is approximately 5% higher than the employees current pay rate, whichever is ~reater, provided that the new rate does not exceed the maximum rate for the new classification. Ctty of Temscula - Personne'; Po'l'tcy - October 9, 1990 50 Wage Administration Page 4 An employee who is reclassified to a position which has a lower maximum pay rate than the maximum pay rate for the employee's current position, will be Y-rated in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Y-Rate Period 0 through 2 6 months 2 through 5 I year 5 through 10 2 years 10 or more 5 years For purposes of this policy, Y-Rate or Y-Rated shall be defined as a freezing the employee's salary at the rate paid prior to the employee being reclassified. Ce An employee who is Y-Rated shall have his/her salary frozen at the rate at the time of the Y-Rate until either { l ) the period of the Y-Rate expires, or, (2) the maximum rate for his/her new classification exceeds his/her rate at the time of the Y-Rate. d® If the maximum rate for the new range has not exceeded the employee's rate at the conclusion of the Y-Rate period, the employee's salary will be readjusted to the maximum rate of the new range. eo If the Maximum rate exceeds the employee's rate during the period of the Y- Rate, the employee will be eligible for merit increases in accordance with this policy. II. Exceotlons: Based upon the specific circumstances of a promotion, demotion or reclassification, the City Manager, or a designee, may make an exception to the policies described above. C'l?,y of Temcula - Personnel Pol'lcy - October 9, 1990 51 City of Temecula Discipline and Problem Personnel Policies October 9~ 1990 Solving Subject: Discipline Related Policies: Categories of Employment Employee Work Rules Probation Period Recruitment The City expects employees to conform to established policies, procedures and rules. Employees are also expected to perform their assigned duties in an efficient, effective and competent manner. When it is necessary to formally address and correct inappropriate employee behavior or performance problems, the City may, at its option, impose disciplinary action. Policy: 1. Probationary, promotional probation and project employees are excluded from this policy. Disciplinary measures may be taken for any good and sufficient cause. The extent of the disciplinary action taken shall be commensurate with the offense, provided that the prior employment history of the employee may also be considered pertinent. Cause may include violation of the Personnel Ordinance, or of these Rules, or any Department or Personnel rules and/or regulations; any act of insubordination or act detrimental to the public service or any departmental policy or rule failure; refusal or inability to comply with the duties of the position occupied by the employee, or any other type of misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance relating to the employee% duties, office or position. 3. A supervisor who is considering a Disciplinary Action should discuss the circumstances of the situation with the Personnel Officer before taking any action. 4. Disciplinary Action will normally, but is not required to, be taken in progressive steps as follows: Verbal Reminder: The supervisor holds a Verbal Reminder meeting with the employee. The purpose of the meeting is to explain the employee*s conduct or acts which are in violation of City Rules, policies or practices and to remind the employee of the behavior that is expected in the future and the consequences of not meeting the performance expectations of the supervisor. C~ty of Temecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 53 Discipline Page 2 Written Reminder: The supew isor prepares a Written Reminder memo. The written reminder shall constitute notice of the infraction(s) including time and circumstances; a statement of how this conduct has had an adverse impact on the Cityls or departmenCs operations; a statement of rules, regulations, alleged to be violated by the employee; a warning that additional disciplinary action may be taken if the employeels performance or conduct does not improve; and the supervisorts signature. The supervisor will hold a Written Reminder meeting with the employee. i. Employees who have received written reminders are entitled to the following due process: (1) A meeting with the supervisor to discuss the contents of the written reminders. (2) The opportunity to present a written response to the reminder and to have their written response considered before the written reminder is placed in the employeeIs personnel file. The employee must submit any written response to the City Manager, or a designee, to be forwarded to the issuer of the written reminder for consideration. (3) The employee has ten (10) business days from receipt of the written reminder in which to write a response to it and/or request and informally meet with the person issuing the reminder to discuss itst contents. The issuer of the reminder will then consider it and based on that consideration, either withdraw the reminder or submit it to the City Manager, or a designee, to be placed in the employeets personnel file. The employeels written response, if any, will be placed in his/her Personnel file. c. Last Steo 0vtions A supervisor may, but is not required to, use one or more of the following steps as a final option in the discipline process: Contemplation Leave: An employee may be placed on a one day Contemplation Leave with pay to allow the employee time to consider whether he/she can and will meet the expectations of the supervisor. C4t~ o"F Tmnecula - Per.so~nel Pol'lc,y - October' 9, 1990 54 Discipline Page 3 In considering a Contemplation Leave, the supervisor will follow all of the steps listed under the Written Reminder section of this policy. In addition, the supervisor will include in the memo to the employee an explanation that the purpose of the Contemplation Leave is for the employee to decide whether he/she intends to meet the expectations of the supervisor in his/her future performance. The employee will be directed to prepare a written statement explaining how he/she will meet the supervisor's expectations if he/she decides to return to work after the Contemplation Leave. When the employee returns from the Contemplation Leave, he/she will meet with the supervisor and explain how he/she intends to take steps to meet the expectations of the supervisor. The supervisor will review the statement prepared by the employee and, if necessary, modify it to assure that it meets the needs of the City. The employee shall be warned that failure to comply with the expectations of the supervisor as per the agreement may be grounds for discipline up to and including termination. If the employee returns from the one day Contemplation Leave without a written statement, the supervisor may impose a suspension without pay in addition to the Contemplation Leave. ii. Time Off Without Pay: An employee may be given Time Off Without Pay. When placing an employee on Time Off Without Pay, the supervisor shall follow all of the steps listed under the Notice of Intent (Section 8), Pre-disciplinary (Section 9), and Appeal (Section 10) sections for this policy. 111. Termination: When it is necessary to terminate an employee, the supervisor shall follow all procedures for Notice of Intent (Section 9}, Pre-disciplinary (Section 10) and Appeal {Section I l) sections of this policy. Stme~isorv Discretion: A supervisor is not required to follow the Last Step options outlined above in sequential order. Depending upon the specific circumstances of the violation, the supervisor may determine which option(s) is (are) appropriate. EmploYee Acknowledgment: Whenever a disciplinary action is taken, it shall be documented and the employee will be asked to acknowledge the document by signing that he/she has received a copy. If the employee does not sign the memo, the supervisor will write, "Employee Refused to Sign" on the bottom of the memo and initial and date the notation and provide the employee with a copy of the Performance Review. C~ty of Tenicula - Pe~ionnel Polqcy - October 9, 1990 55 Discipline Page 4 7. Investigator~ Leave,: An employee may be placed on an Investigatory Leave with pay to allow his/her supervisor time to fully review the facts of an alleged violation. Serious Violations: If the employee knew or should have known that his/her behavior was in clear violation of a City rule, policy or practice, or was in violation of a state or federal law, or created a potential or real threat to the safety of himself/herself, other employees, or the public, the employee may be removed from the work place immediately without pay, pending an investigation of the incident. Such removal shall not exceed twenty-four (24) hours at which time the employee may be given a notice of intent to impose discipline. Violations in this category include, but are not limited to, possession, sale, use or being under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs during work hours, fighting, abusing other employees or citizens, stealing property or funds or willfully destroying City property. 9. Notice of Intent a® Notice of Intent ReQuired. A Notice of Intent shall be given to the employee whenever the City intends to discipline by suspension for more than five (5) working days, reduction in pay or demotion to a classification with a lower top step or termination. Notice of Intent. When a Notice of Intent is required, the notice shall be given to the affected employee either by delivery of the notice to the employee in person; or by placing the Notice of Intent in the United States Mail, first class, postage paid, and by Certified Mail, return receipt requested, in an envelope addressed to the employee's last known home address. It shall be the responsibility of the employee to inform the personnel office, in writing, of his/her current home address and of any change in such address, and the information so provided shall constitute the employee's "last known address." Such personal delivery or mailing shall be conclusively presumed to provide actual notice to the affected employee. Whether delivery is made in person or by mail, the Notice of Intent shall contain a ~statement of delivery or mailing" indicating the date on which the Notice of Intent was personally delivered or deposited in the United States Mail. Such date of delivery or mailing shall be the "date of issuance" of the Notice of Intent. Ct~y of T~scula - I~rsonnsl 1~o14cy - 0ctol~r 9, ~990 56 Discipline Page 5 c. Content of Notice of Intent. The Notice of Intent shalh i. Inform the employee of the disciplinary action intended and the effective date of the action; ii. Set forth the nature of the infraction(s) including the time and circumstances of the incident(s); any previous disciplinary actions taken; a statement of how the conduct has had an adverse impact on the City's or department's operation; and, a statement of rules or regulations alleged to be violated; iii. Inform the employee of the right to respond, orally or in writing, to the City Manager, or a designee, and the fact that such response must be received by said person within five (5) business days of the date of issuance of the notice; iv. Inform the employee of his/her right to representation during the Pre- disciplinary Hearing. Written ResDonse to Notice. The employee shall be entitled to respond in writing to the Notice of Intent described above. Such response must be received by the City Manager, or a designee, within five {5) business days from the date of issuance of the Notice of Intent. After review of an employee's timely response, if any, the City Manager, or a designee, shall notify the employee of any action to be taken. Such action to be taken may not include discipline more severe than that described in the Notice of Intent; however, the City may reduce such discipline without the issuance of a further Notice of Intent. 10. Pre-discivlinary Hearing. An employee who receives a Notice of Intent may request a hearing on the Notice of |ntent. The request for such a hearing shall be delivered to the City Manager, or a designee, within five (5) business days of the issuance of the Notice of Intent. Upon the receipt of a request for a hearing, the employee's Department Head, or a designee, shall schedule a hearing with the employee and supervisor to review the proposed action and allegations. Susvension With Pay Pendin~ Pre-discivlinarv Hearing. An employee may be placed on suspension with pay pending a determination of the City Manager, or a designee, of the disciplinary action. C~ty of Temecula - Personnel Pol~c~ - October 9, 1990 57 Discipline Page 6 ll. Avveal Rights. Regular employees may appeal disciplinary actions or suspensions exceeding five (5) days, reduction of pay, demotions or termination to the City Manager, or a design.e, by filing a written request to the City Manager, or a designee, within five (5) business days after service of Notice to Impose Disciplinary Action. Within fifteen {15) business days thereafter, the City Manager, or a design.e, shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on the matter and may continue the hearing where appropriate. Within ten (10) business days of the close of the hearing, a written statement of decision shall be issued. The decision of the City Manager shall be final and binding. The hearing shall not be conducted in accordance with the technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses, but shall be conducted in a manner most conducive to the determination of the truth. Any relevant evidence may be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rules which might make improper admission of such evidence over objection in a court of law. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of explaining any direct evidence but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding, unless it would be admissible over objections in civil actions. c. The rules of privilege shall be effective to the extent that they are otherwise required by statute to be recognized at the hearing. d. Irrelevant evidence and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. If the City Manager elects to designate a Hearing Officer, the findings of the Hearing Officer shall be advisory to the City Manager and shall not be binding on the City Manager. 12. Extensions of Time Limits. The time limits established in these policies may be waived by the City Manager, or a designee. 13. Placement in Personnel File. Official disciplinary action documents shall be placed in the employeels personnel file in the Personnel Office. C~t~ of Tsmscula - li~onnsl Pollc~ - October 9, 1990 58 Subiect: Problem Solving Policy: The City supports a policy of open, informal communication between supervisors and employees. If an issue or situation arises related to the administration of the City's personnel policies, an employee's pay or working conditions which is more appropriately addressed in a formal manner, the following procedure may be used: ae Sten 1: The employee should first discuss the issue or situation with his/her supervisor within ten (10) calendar days from the time the employee knew or should have known that a problem existed. The supervisor will consider the employee's viewpoint and provide a response within ten (10) calendar days. be Step 2: If the employee believes the issue or situation is not resolved, he/she may, within 3 business days after receiving a decision from his/her supervisor, request a meeting with his/her Department Head. The requests must be in writing. The request must explain the problem the employee is concerned about and indicate the solution the employee is seeking. The Department Head will meet with the employee or review the available documentation related to the problem and provide a decision within ten (10) calendar days. Step 3: If the employee believes the issue or situation is not resolved, he/she may, within 3 business days after receiving a decision from his/her supervisor, request a meeting with the City Manager or a designee. The City Manager, or a design.e, will meet with the employee or review the available documentation related to the problem and provide a decision within ten (10) calendar days. The decision of the City Manager or a designee shall be final. 2. Time Period Extensions: The time periods listed above may be extended or waived in writing by the City Manager, or a deslgnee. C~t,y of Tenecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 59 City of Temecula Miscellaneous Personnel Policies October 9, 1990 Subject: Bulletin Boards BackR:round: Administrative bulletin boards provide a means of communicating information about City policies and procedures. The City also has official bulletin boards (which are not covered by this policy) which are designated for posting official documents by the City Clerk. Policy: 1. All posted materials must be approved by the Personnel Office and dated. Materials will be posted and removed at the discretion of the City. 2. Unauthorized materials may not be posted on City bulletin boards. 3. Posted materials must be dated. Materials may be removed after ten (10) calendar days. City of T~m~-ula - ~r$onn~l ~ltcy - October 9, 1990 $ub iect: ~ and Appearance Related Policies: Problem Solving Safety Uniforms Back~round: City employees provide a wide range of services to the residents of Temecula. The City expects its' employees to dress in a conservative manner. Employees are also expected to adhere to a conservative personal appearance standard. In all cases, the dress and appearance of employees should be consistent with the type of work the employee performs. Policy: Office employees are expected to wear clothing such as suits, dresses, slacks, dress shirts or blouses and dress shoes. They are expected to keep hair, including facial hair neatly trimmed and groomed. Office employees are expected to follow personal hygiene habits which prevent offensive body odors. Designated field employees are expected to wear uniforms issued by the City. Some field employees may not be issued uniforms, however, they are expected to dress in a manner which is consistent with the work duties they perform. Field employees are expected to keep hair, including facial hair, neatly trimmed and groomed. Field employees are expected to follow personal hygiene habits which prevent offensive body odors. Discipline: An employee who does not follow the instructions of a supervisor regarding dre-_~s and appearance standards may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Relationship to Problem Solving Procedure: A disagreement, which does not involve discipline, regarding dress or appearance standards may be reviewed under the Problem Solving policy. City of T~scula - la~lo~nel I~ol~cy - [:)ctx~r 9, 1990 62 Lay-off $ubiect: Policy: I. 2. The City reserves the right to lay off employees for lack of work or lack of funds. In the event of a lay off, employees will be selected based upon the following criteria in the order listed: a. The needs of the City, b. Performance, c. Seniority by department and classification, In the event of a recall from a lay off, employees shall be recalled based upon the needs of the City in reverse order of lay off. City of Te~ecula - Personnel Policy - October 9, 1990 63 Subject: Management Rights Policy: 1. The City retains all of its exclusive rights and authority under law, and expressly and exclusively retains its management rights which include, but are not limited to: a. the right to determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards, b. set standards and levels of service and means for providing them, c. determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotions, d. direct its employees and determine staffing patterns, e. establish and enforce reasonable dress and grooming standards, f. determine the number and kinds of personnel required, g. maintain the efficiency of governmental operations, h. determine the methods, means and numbers of kinds of personnel by which government operations are to be conducted, I. determine the content and scope of job classifications, j. classify and reclanify positions, k. determine methods of financing, 1. determine style and/or types of City-issued wearing apparel, equipment or technology to be used, C~t~ of Temicula - Personnel Poltcy- ~r 9, 1990 Management Rights Page 2 m. determine and/or change the facilities, methods, technology, means, organizational structure and size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted, n. determine and change the number of locations, relocations and types of operations, process and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions, including, but not limited to, the right to contract for, or sub contract any work or operations of the City, o. to assign work and schedule employees in accordance with requirements as determined by the City and to establish and change work schedules, hours and assignments, p. establish and modify productivity and performance programs and standards, q. discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, withhold salary increases and benefits, or otherwise discipline employees, r. establish performance standards including, but not limited to, quality and quantity standards, and to require compliance therewith, s. take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies, t. exercise complete control and discretion over its organization including, but not limited to, personnel, and the technology of performing its work and to contract work out. 2. The exercise by the City through its City Council and management representatives of its rights shall not in any way, directly or indirectly, be subject to any procedure. C'lt~ o~f T~mscu"la - Psr'sonns'l Pol'lc,y - Oct, obey' 9, 1990 65 Subject: Telephones Policy: City telephones are provided for conducting City business. Excessive personal use of City telephones shall be cause for disciplinary action. Employees may be charged for the cost of personal telephone calls, including local and long distance calls· City o( T~m~culm - P~nel ~olicy - October 9, 1990 66 City of Temecula Safety Personnel Policies October 9, 1990 Subject: Safety Backiround: Employees are expected to plan and carry out work assignments with their personal safety and the safety of others at all times. The City requires that accidents or injuries be reported immediately to assure that (a) appropriate medical care is provided, (b) necessary insurance reports are filed, and, (c) an investigation or review of the incident is conducted on a timely basis. Policy: 1. Observance of Safely Rules: Each employee is responsible for complying with all established safety rules, regulations and practices, including smoking rules. Reoorting Accidents: All employees must report immediately any accidents involving City-owned equipment or involving City employees on City time to their supervisor. If the employee's supervisor is not available, he/she shall report the accident to the next higher level of supervision or to the City Manager's Office. Any damage to City-owned property, or any accident involving City employees, equipment or property must be reported. Failure to report an accident may be grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination. a. Any employee involved in any accidents that are the fault of the employee may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Any employee whose reckless or negligent conduct causes an accident, damage to any property or equipment, or injury to any person shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Revortim~ lnturies: Employee injuries while on the job must be reported to the employee's supervisor, no matter how minor, even if they only require first aid treatment. Failure to report on-the-job injuries or to report for medical treatment may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. C~ty of T~a - Personnel laol~cy - ~r 9, 1990 68 Subiect: Smoking Refere. Ar~: County of Riverside Ordinance 618 Policy: 1. Smoking is specifically prohibited at all times except in specifically designated areas. 2. All employees and visitors are expected to follow this policy. An employee found to be in violation of the policy may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. C'lt,y of Ternscull - Personnel Policy - 0cto~r 9, 1990 69 Sub iect: Uniforms The City may provide uniforms for all field employees. The uniforms are provided to allow customers and the public to easily identify City employees, to assure the professional appearance of our employees and for the convenience of employees. po. licy: 1. The City provides designated field employees with uniforms. The uniforms consist of shirts and pants. The City provides laundry service for the uniforms. 2. Each field employee is required to wear City provided uniforms while on duty. 3. The City will determine the need for and timing of uniform replacement. The City provides each field employee with necessary safety equipment and tools. Employees are expected to be familiar with and use and maintain City provided tools and safety equipment. Each field employee must wear work shoes which provide adequate protection as determined by his/her supervisor. The City will provide safety shoes or other protection to employees whose duties require such equipment. The Field Operations Manager will determine the need for such equipment. 7. Upon termination, City issued uniforms, jackets and any City provided equipment must be returned to the City. 6. An employee who does wear assigned uniforms and safety equipment will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. C'~t,.y of Teenec~ll - Per'~onnel Pol'lc~ - C)ct, ober 9, l~JO '70 Sublect: Vehicles Related Policies: Safety Policy: California Driver's License: All employees who are required to operate a motor vehicle within their classification must acquire and maintain an appropriate, valid California Driver License. as Revoked or Susvended Driverts License: An employee whose Driver's License is revoked, suspended or restricted for any reason must report the change in driving privileges to his/her supervisor immediately. If an employee voluntarily reports the suspension or revocation of a Driver license, the City will make an effort, but is not required to, provide work for the employee which does not involve driving for the employee. The work may be in a classification and at a pay rate which is different from the employeels regular classification and pay rate as determined by the City. be Drivin~ Without a License: An employee who drives a City vehicle without a valid California Driver License will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Accidents: All vehicle accidents must be reported immediately to the empl~yee's supervisor and the sheriff, police or Highway patrol agency with jurisdiction. If the supervisor is not available, the employee must report the accident to his/her next higher level of supervision or to the City Manager~s Office. as For purposes of this policy only, immediately shall mean as soon as practical following first aid or treatment of any injuries. If the City offices are closed, the accident must be reported at the start of the next business day following the accident. Truck. Vehicle And Eeuloment SecuritY: All City owned trucks, vehicles, and equipment must be returned to the designated City premises every day. Special authorization must be obtained from the employeeIs supervisor to park trucks, vehicles, or equipment off the City premises. Unauthorized Use of Vehicles: City vehicles are provided for the purpose of conducting official City business only. Unauthorized use of City vehicles for any purpose other than official business is considered grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. C4ty o~ T~la - ~nwl Po14cy - ~r 9, lg~ 71 City of Temecula Index Abandonment of Position .......................................... 1 Anniversary Dates .............................................. 2 Attendance - Non-exempt Employees ................................ 32 Bulletin Boards ................................................ 61 Categories of Employment ......................................... 3 Comprehensive Annual Leave ...................................... :33 Discipline ................................................... 53 Dress and Appearance ........................................... 62 Drug-Free Work Place ............................................ 6 Dual Employment .............................................. 17 Garnishments ................................................. 43 Harassment .................................................. 14 Holidays .................................................... 36 Hours of Work - Non-exempt Employees .............................. 18 Insurance .................................................... 44 Insurance - Regular Employees ..................................... 44 Jury Duty ................................................... 37 Lay-off ..................................................... 63 Leave of Absence Without Pay ..................................... 38 Management Rights ............................................ 64 Military Leave ............................................ · .... 41 Nepotism .................................................... 19 Non-Discrimination ............................................. 21 Overtime - Non-exempt Employees .................................. 45 Pay Periods and Pay Days ........................................ 46 Performance Reviews ........................................... 47 Personnel Files ................................................ 22 Personnel Policies .............................................. 23 Probation Periods .............................................. 25 Problem Solving ............................................... 59 Recruitment ................................................. 26 Reference Checks .............................................. 29 Safety ...................................................... 68 Smoking .................................................... 69 Telephones .................................................. 66 Temporary Upgrade ............................................ 30 Uniforms .................................................... 70 Vehicles .................................................... 71 Wage Administration ............................................ 48 ITEM NO. 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Scott F. Field, City Attorney October 10, 1990 OVERWEIGHT VEHICLE ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 90-XX establishing vehicle weight restrictions on Calle Medusa. DISCUSSION: Vehicle Code Section 35701 permits a city to prohibit the use of a street by a commercial vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit as established by the City. Court cases interpreting this Section establish that this limitation may be established where the design of the road and/or traffic safety considerations dictate the restriction. In the case of Calle Medusa, this is a "cut-through" street being used by truck traffic. This was a street designed for residential use only, and as the Police Chief's report indicates, truck traffic on this street poses a significant safety hazard. Accordingly, it is recommended that the City council adopt this Ordinance establishing gross weight limits for Calle Medusa. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 90-XX establishing gross weight limits on Calle Medusa Road. Report regarding Calle Medusa from Rick Sayre to Scott Field. ORDINANCE NO. 90- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAFFER 12.06 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING VEHICLE WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON THE PUBLIC STREETS. WHEREAS, the Chief of Police submitted a report to the City Council which concludes that vehicles exceeding a gross weight to 10,000 pounds pose a traffic and safety hazard when traveling on certain identified streets within the City of Temecula; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 12.06 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code, which shall read as follows: "CHAPTER" TRUCK WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS Sections: 12.06.010 Prohibition 12.06.020 Designation 12.06.030 Signs 12.06.010. Prohibition. Vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of 10,000 pounds are prohibited on the streets designated in Section 12.06.020 of this chapter. 12.06.020. Desipnation. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, the following streets or portions of streets are restricted to vehicles not exceeding a maximum gross weight of 10,000 pounds: 1. Calle Medusa, from La Serena to Nicholas Road 12.06.030. Signs. Whenever this Chapter or any ordinance of the City designates any street or portion thereof as a restricted street, the City Engineer shall cause said street to be posted with signs providing substantially as follows: "Restricted Access - Vehicles Under 10,000 pounds only." 12.06.040. Exceptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to: (1) Commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups 3/Ords06 -1- or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained. (2) Passenger buses under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities commission; (3) Any vehicle owned by a public utility necessary for the construction, installation, maintenance or repair of public utilities; or (4) Any vehicle owned and operated by a public agency. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 16th day of October, 1990. ATTEST Ronald J. Parks, Mayor David F. Dixon, City Clerk [SEAL] 3lOrds06 -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, David F. Dixon, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 90- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of October and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 30th day of October, 1990 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: David F. Dixon, City Clerk 3/Ords06 -3- Mayor Ron Parks Mayor Pro Tern Karel F. Lindemans CITY OF TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, California 92390 ('714) 694-1989 FAX (714) 694-1999 Chief of Police Kick Sayre Councilmembers Patricia H. Birdsall Peg Moore I. 5al Munoz TO: Fm: Re: Scott Field Rick Sayre /~~jL Calle Medusa to Commercial Vehicles 09-09-90 The California Vehicle Code defines Calle Medusa as a residential street. The homes on either side of Calle Medusa are single family structures which are occupied by families with young children. It is not uncommon to find young children playing in their yards along Calle Medusa. Calle Medusa is a winding road with several side streets entering into it. Combining Calle Medusa's curves and intersecting streets with its changing road elevations results in a street that should be limited to light residential vehicles only. As you are aware complaints from the homeowners living on Calle Medusa have been an issue since it was improved and linked to Nicholas Road and La Serena Way. Currently Calle Medusa is being used as a short cut for various motorists including large trucks with heavy loads ranging from construction material to dump trucks loaded with earth. The most aggravating and dangerous vehicles are commercial trucks, mainly due to their size, weight loads, and braking limitations. The combination of the design of the street, its residential classification, and the limitations of large trucks results in a dangerous situation for the families who live on Calle Medusa. During the month of July of this year a speed enforcement program was conducted on Calle Medusa. The program resulted in over 100 citations being issued for speed violations. A number of the citations were issued to drivers of large commercial trucks. Commercial vehicle traffic on Calle Medusa should be limited to vehicles under 10,000 pounds. This recommendation is based solely upon law enforcement observations related to health and safety issues. ITEM NO. 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council City Manager October 12, 1990 Public Forum Meeting Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Receive direction from Council on appropriate week of the month to hold Public Forum Meeting. ITEM NO. 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council City Manager October 12, 1990 Calle Medusa Traffic Study Review of documents not complete, therefore it will be sent under separate cover. ITEM NO. 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council City Manager October 12, 1990 Measure "A" Funds Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Discussion requested by Mayor Ronald J. Parks.