HomeMy WebLinkAbout011299 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JANUARY 12, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant.to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 42049 Main Street,
Temecula (APN 922-036-020), 28545 Front Street (APN 922-035-001), 28677 Front
Street (APN 922-045-017), 28735 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-019), 28731 Pujol Street
(APN 922-062-016), 28725 Pujol Street (APN 922-0062-010), 42291 Sixth Street (APN
922-052-011), no situs (APN 922-053-080), 41830 Sixth Street (APN 922-031-018),
41858 Fifth Street (APN 922-031-009), 41843 Fifth Street (APN 922-022-010). The
negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/parcels of Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula and Lorraine Clark, Ladd Penfold, Ladanyi Rutner, Corbin, Ciais,
Otto lot, Pelonero, Valencia, and Eppenger. Under negotiation is the price and terms
of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired.
2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at northeast corner' of La
Paz Street and Highway 79 South (APN 922-190-025). The negotiating parties are the
City of Temecula, County of Riverside and Moramarco. Under negotiation are the
price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired.
3. Conference With~real property negotiator: pursuant to~Government iCode Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at the west side of Second
and Front Streets (APN 922-046-022 and 922-073-024). The negotiating parties are the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, First and Front LLP, and Cleveland
Investment Co. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment to the real
property interests proposed to be acquired.
4. Conference :with: City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to :Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)i:With respect to two matters of existing litigation involving :the City.
Theifollowing cases and claims :will be discussed: a) Eli Lilly& Company and b)Claim
of Westside City' LLC. : : ~ :
R:~Agenda\011299
1
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 99-01
Resolution: No. 99-01
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Justin Shultz
Invocation:
Youth Pastor Tyler Longness of Baha'i Community of Temecula
Flag Salute:
Councilman Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificates of Valor
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, then (1 O) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be Enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
R:~Agenda\011299
2
2
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of November 24, 1998;
2.2 Approve the minutes of November 30, 1998;
2.3 Approve the minutes of December 3, 1998;
2.4 Approve the minutes of December 4, 1998;
2.5 Approve the minutes of December 8, 1998.
Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET
FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1998.
Amendment to Fire Protection A.qreement for Fiscal Year 1998-99
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the amended Fire Protection Agreement for Fiscal Year 1998-99 and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement, final form to be approved by the City
Manager and the City Attorney.
Purchase of two (2) City Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the purchase of two (2) 1999 Dodge regular sized vehicles from Norm
Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge in the amount of $39,874.48 (both).
R:~,genda\011299
3
7
Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy
8
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21067 ('located northwesterly of the intersection
of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road)
RECOMMENDATION
8.1 Accept the Public Improvements including subdivision monumentation in Tract No.
21067;
8.2 Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities to the 10% warranty
amount, release of the Subdivision Monumentation security, and initiation of the
one-year warranty period;
8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
9
Accept Substitute Agreement and Security for Erosion Control in Tentative Tract Nos.
23143-2, -3, and - 4 (located southeasterly of the intersection of Pauba Road at
Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Security for Erosion
Control in Tentative Tract Nos. 23143-2, -3, and -4;
9.2 Authorize the release of the Erosion Control Security posted by Crowne Meadows,
L.L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership;
9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developers and sureties.
10
Authorize access to RVcrest Drive from Lot 4 in Tract No. 22208 (located northeasterly of
Mar.qarita Road at Solana Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Authorize driveway access to Lot 4 in Tract No. 22208 from Rycrest Drive by
permitting an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approval of the final Tract Map;
10.2
Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location subject to the issuance
of an encroachment permit setting forth conditions of approval including slope
protection and landscape and irrigation relocation/restoration to the satisfaction of
TCSD staff.
R:~genda\011299
4
11 Accept Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3(A) (located
northwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3(A);
11.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the 10% warranty
amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
11.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
12 Accept Public Improvements for interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3('B) (located
northwesterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Accept Public Improvements for interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3(B);
12.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the 10% warranty
amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
12.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
13 Release Traffic Signalization Miti.qation and Labor and Materials Securities in Parcel Map
27714 (located east of Ynez Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation and Labor and Materials
securities in Parcel Map No. 27714;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety.
14 Authorization to Preorder the Traffic Signal Poles for Winchester Road/Ynez Road -
Proiect No. PW97-06 - and Mar.qarita Road/Overland Drive - Project No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Authorize staff to preorder the traffic signal poles for Winchester Road/Ynez Road -
Project No. PW97-06 - and Margarita Road/Overland Drive - Project No. PW97-07 -
from McCain Traffic Supply for an amount of $83,397.25.
15 Winchester Road at I-15 Off-Ramp Widenin.q - Project No. PW97-03
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for irrigation relocation in the amount of
$32,690.76.
R:~genda\011299
5
16
17
18
19
Amendment No. 1 to Professional Service Agreement with CHJ, Inc. for the Old Town
Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Approve Amendment No. 1 to a Professional Services Agreement between the City
of Temecula and CHJ, Inc. to provide additional Professional Inspection Services for
the Old Town Streetscape Project - Project No. PW97-05 - in the amount not to
exceed $18,284.50 and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1.
Completion and Acceptance of the Cosmic Drive and A.qena Street Sidewalk
Improvement Project No. 6 - Proiect No. PW97-02
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-
year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
17.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Parcel Map No. 28657-1 (located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Remin.qton
Avenue)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28657-1 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
18.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
18.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Letters of Credit as
security for the agreements.
Award of Construction Contract for Installation of a Traffic Si.clnal at the Intersection of
Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Award a construction contract for the installation of a traffic signal at the subject
intersection to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of $75,269.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
19.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $7,526.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
R:~genda\011299
6
2O
21
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for
Construction and Funding of Front Street Improvements - south of Ranch California Road
to Moreno Road - Proiect No. PWgS-06
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of
Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for
construction and funding of Front Street Improvements south of Rancho California
Road to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06;
20.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of he City in substantially
the form attached to the Agenda Report.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-22
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
REVISE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE OF
OLD TOWN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0472)
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~,genda\011299
7
TEMECULA ':COMMUNITYiSERVICES DISTRICT MEETING.
""" .. ;.: ":~.'. ...:;~!.:!. :~:.: '.~:' . ."::::.. . ........ ~;:::: .... :.:~;. ..::; .!;,~;;
.' ~::,.: . '.:.' · .?~1::. ,. ;'.::. .. ::.: ....... · :!:..: .... . .,
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-01
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 8, 1998.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 26, 1999, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\011299
8
· TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING ::;:
" ....' . .. :::: .' ;:~" : :i~:.:'.. ........ .......... '::~.ij~:...:.' · ":" ' '':'~' .:.:i:.~.. . .....;::;:~. ........
*~**~.*i.~*~***~*********~***w~;**~*~**~******~**~*~*~*~****~*~*`~*~*~**~*~***~*****~******* '
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01
Resolution: No. RDA 99-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
2
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 8, 1998.
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the City of Temecula for Construction
and Fundin.q of the Front Street Improvements - south of Rancho California Road
to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City
of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for the
Front Street Improvements - south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road -
Project No. PW98-06;
R:~genda\011299
9
2.2
Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in
substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report;
2.3
Authorize the budgeted expenditure of $265,000.00 by the Redevelopment
Agency for the Agency's share of costs to date for the west side of Front Street
Improvements south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road as well as
authorize the expenditure for future project costs incurred as approved by the
City or Agency.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 26, 1999, scheduled to follow the Community Services District
Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\011299
10
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval
of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
22
Planning ADDlication No. PA98-0397 (Zoninq Amendment) - An Amendment to the Citv's
Zoning MaD, adding Planned Development Overlay No. 2 (PDO-2) with Correspondin.q
Changes to the Development Code
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0397
(Zoning Amendment);
22.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO ADD A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 (PDO-2) TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA
ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA
ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004,
AND ADDING SECTION 17.22.110 THROUGH 17.22.118 TO
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY NO. 2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0397
23
Planning Application PA98-0318 and PA98-0449: (General Plan Amendment and Zone
Change) Corona Ranch
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA98-0318 and
PA98-0449;
23.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\011299
11
24
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND
952-150-003)
23.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND
952-150-003)
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay ('PDO-1) Planning Application PA97-0237 -
General Plan Amendment and Zone ChanGe
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0237;
24.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
24.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF
THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019,
020, AND 032 AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH
17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. I (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
R:~Agenda\011299
12
COUNCIL BUSINESS
25
26
Award of Construction Contract for Mall Improvements for Ynez Road - Winchester Road
to Overland Drive and Winchester Road/Ynez Road to Mar.qarita Road - Project No.
PW97-06
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Receive an oral report on the bids received January 7, 1999;
25.2
Award a construction contract for Ynez Road - Winchester Road to Overland Drive
and Winchester Road/Ynez Road to Margarita Road - Project No. PW 97-06 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
25.3 Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount.
Award of Construction Contract for Mar.qarita Road, Overland Drive, and Lon.cl Canyon
Creek Improvements - Proiect No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Receive an oral report on the bids received January 7, 1999;
26.2 Award a construction contract for Margarita Road, Overland Drive, and Long
Canyon Creek Improvements - Project No. PW97-07;
26.3 Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount.
27 Selection of City Council Committee Assi.qnments
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve on each of the following committees:
· Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
· Riverside Transit Agency
· WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Governments) Representative
· French Valley Airport Committee
· Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors
· Temecula/M urrieta Joint Transportation/Traffic Committee
27.2 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following
Committees:
· Economic Development Committee
· Finance Committee
· Old Town Steering Committee
· Public Works/Facilities Committee
· Joint City Council/TVSD Committee
R:~Agenda\011299
13
· Murrieta Creek Advisory Board - appoint one member and one alternate
· Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee
· Old Town Parking Incentives Ad Hoc Committee
· League of California Congress - Voting Delegates
· School Impact Mitigation Fees Ad Hoc Committee
· Riverside County Transportation Commission - appoint one member and one
alternate
· League of California Cities
27.3 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City
Commissions and Committees and to the Pechanga Tribal Council.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 26, 1998, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~,genda~11299
14
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
0
0
¢.)
o
0 ~
0
~ -.~
0
~ '.~
~:~ "~
0
~ 0
;>
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 3, 1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
4:41 P.M. in the Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Mayor Pro Tem Ford presiding.
Councilmembers:
Councilmember:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and Ford.
Roberrs.
The City Council convened in Closed Session to discuss the following:
Consideration of appointment for the position of City Manager pursuant to the
Provisions of Government Code Section 54957.
ADJOURNMENT
At 5:24 P.M., the City Council adjourned the Closed Session and continued the meeting to
Friday, December 4, 1998, at 9:00 A.M.
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 4, 1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
10:00 A.M. in the Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Mayor Pro Tem Ford presiding.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and Ford.
Absent:
Councilmember: Roberrs.
The City Council announced its decision to name Shawn Nelson as the Acting City Manager,
effective January 4, 1999; advised that current Assistant City Manager Jim O'Grady will remain
in that position and will serve as Acting City Manager from December 24, 1998 to January 4,
1999; and noted that Director of Community Development Thornhill would be promoted to the
position of Deputy City Manager.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:50 A.M. the City Council formally adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, December 8, 1998,
at 7:00 P.M. in City Council Chambers.
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 24, 1 998
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order
6:08 P.M. in the Main Conference Room,
California. Mayor Roberts presiding.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
at
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberrs.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
Also present were City Manager Bradley and Deputy City Clerk Ballreich.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 Selection of an Executive Search Firm
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Select a professional consulting firm to conduct the City Manager recruitment.
City Manager Bradley informed the Councilmembers that staff has solicited proposals from four
executive search firms and that three of the firms responded and will be making their
presentations this evening, noting that one of the firms will be making its presentation via
telephone.
Mr. Doug Clark, Vice President of PMW Associates, provided a detailed presentation of PMW
Associates' proposal, highlighting key issues as well as the proposed research process. In
response to the Councilmembers,
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
Advising that there are no reportable actions on the first portion of the Closed Session, City
Attorney Thorson advised that because the Council was unable to complete its Closed Session
items, the Council would be returning to Closed Session.
At 8:08 P.M., the City Council returned to Closed Session and resumed to Open Session at 8:27
P.M.
Having concluded two portions of Closed Session, City Attorney Thorson advised that there are
no reportable actions under the Brown Act. With respect to the three real estate matters,
Council gave further direction and that any action would be taken in Open Session. With regard
to the one potential litigation matter, which was continued, with respect to the subsequent need
item, and with respect to the personnel issue relative to the City Manager, City Attorney Thorson
advised that there are no reportable actions.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:57 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
November 24, 1998, at 6:00 P.M., in the Main Conference Room.
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 30, 1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
8:00 A.M. in the Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Mayor Roberts presiding.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberts.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
The meeting was called to order by City Clerk Jones after which the City Council convened into
Closed Session to discuss the following:
Consideration of appointment for the position of City Manager pursuant to the
Provisions of Government Code Section 54957.
At 9:25 A.M., the City Council reconvened in Open Session and advised that the Closed
Session would be recessed to 5:45 P.M. At 5:50P P.M., the City Council continued with its
Closed Session item (as noted above). At 7:40 P.M. the City Council reconvened in Open
Session to announce that this meeting would be continued to Thursday, December 3, 1998, at
4:30 P.M. in the Main Conference Room.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:41 P.M., Mayor Roberrs formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Thursday,
December 3, 1998, at 4:30 P.M., in the Main Conference Room.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 8, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Consideration of appointment for the position of City Manager pursuant to the
provisions of Government Code Section 54957.
2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to
each matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where
there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the Agency based
on existing facts and circumstances.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
PRELUDE MUSIC
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberrs.
Councilmember: None.
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Sara Pillus.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Ford.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Achievement to Darin Edward Evans for attaining Eagle Scout
Apprising the City Council of his Eagle Scout project, Darin Evans accepted, with
appreciation, the Certificate of Achievement.
Certificate of Appreciation to Ginny Reynolds - Old Town Ambassador
The Certificate was presented to Ms. Reynolds by Mayor Pro Tem Ford. Ms. Reynolds
welcomed the public to visit Old Town.
Certificate of Appreciation to Kay Williams - Old Town Liaison
The Certificate was presented to Ms. Williams by Mayor Pro Tem Ford. Ms. Williams
relayed her pleasurable experiences with having had the opportunity to work in Old
Town.
Presentation of the Citv's updated Web Page
By way of overheads, Mayor Roberts provided an overview and highlighted key areas of
the City's newly created Web Page.
Presentation of the Economic Development Strate.qv Report by Dr. John Husin.q
Assistant City Manager O'Grady briefly reviewed the final report on the City's Economic
Development Strategy and noted that staff would recommend that any action with regard to this
report be deferred to the January 26, 1999, City Council meeting. At this time, Mr. O'Grady
introduced Dr. John Husing.
By way of overheads, Dr. Husing proceeded with a detailed overview of the City's Economic
Development Strategy Report. In response to Council discussion, Dr. Husing further elaborated
on Development Impact Fees, Labor Cost, Labor Reduction Cost, and Water/Sewer rates.
Councilman Lindemans commended Dr. Husing on the report; relayed his delight with the report
in that it provides solutions; and requested that staff further explore the possibility of the brine
line.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. In response to Councilman Lindemans, City Attorney Thorson advised that the parking
in-lieu program for Old Town would be considered a City function versus Redevelopment
Agency function because the Specific Plan, with regard to zoning requirements and
development, will require amendment.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATON:
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2
Resolution Approvin.cl List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
2
RESOLUTION NO. 98-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1998
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the minutes of October 13, 1998;
4.2 Approve the minutes of October 27, 1998;
4.3 Approve the minutes of November 3, 1998;
Lease One (1) Electric Truck
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the 36-month lease for one (1) 1999 Ford Ranger electric vehicle
from Fritts Ford Fleet Center in the amount of $15,553.71.
Consent to Record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant Easement for Portion
of Lot 539 of Tract No. 3883
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION
OF AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A
GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES
FOR LOT 539 OF TRACT 3883 FOR PURPOSES OF
RECORDATION BUT NOT ACCEPTING THIS
DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
It was recommended by staff that this item be continued to the December 15,
1998, City Council meeting.
3
8
10
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No, 22915-1 (located at the southeasterly
corner of Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
7, 1 Accept the public streets and sewer and water system improvements in
Tract No, 22915-1;
7,2 Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities to the 10%
warranty amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
7,3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety,
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No, 22916-2 (located northeasterly of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8,1 Accept the Public Improvements Faithful Performance in Tract No, 22916-2;
8,2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the 10%
warranty amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
8,3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety,
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No, 22916-F (located at the northeasterly
corner of Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
RECOM MEN DATION:
9.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No, 22916-F;
9,2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance securities to the 10% warranty
amount and initiation of the one-year warranty period;
9,3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety,
Passen.qer Loading Zone - East Side of Mar.qarita Road between Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road
RECOMMENDATION:
10,1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
4
RESOLUTION NO. 98-114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING PASSENGER
LOADING ZONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF MARGARITA
ROAD BETWEEN PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA
ROAD
This item was pulled for separate discussion; see pages 6 - 7.
11 Program Supplement No, M002 to Administerin.q Local A.qencv/State A.qreement for
Federal-Aid Projects No, 08-5459 ('009)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M002 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-
5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
PROJECT NO. STPLG-5459(009) FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL INSTALLATION ON VIA LAS COLINAS AND
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
12 Proqram Supplement Agreement No, M003 to Administerin.cl Local A.qency/State
A.qreement for Federal-Aid Projects No, 08-5459 (009)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. M003 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-
5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
PROJECT NO. HP 21L-1188(001) OVERLAND DRIVE
OVERCROSSING FROM YNEZ ROAD TO JEFFERSON
AVENUE
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5
and 7-9 and 11-12 (Consent Calendar Item No. 6 was continued to the December 15,
City Council meeting and Item No. 10 was considered under separate discussion; see
below). The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
Under separate discussion - Consent Calendar Item No. l0
10 Passen.qer Loading Zone - East Side of Mar.clarita Road between Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-114
A RESOLTUION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING PASSENGER
LOADING ZONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF MARGARITA
ROAD BETWEEN PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA
ROAD
Public Works Director Kicak reviewed the staff report (of record) and referenced the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission's recommendation to approve the proposed resolution.
Mr. Forrest Thomas, Director of Transportation for the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, noted that the elimination of parking spaces would potentially create student
parking in residential neighborhoods. Although students could park at the Sports Park
(other side of Margarita Road), he stated that the students will not walk the distance
which would then create jaywalking. If the 14 school bus spaces located at the eastern-
most lot on Rancho Vista Road were utilized for student parking, the buses would then
have to park along Margarita Road. If the proposed resolution were passed, Mr.
Thomas suggested the implementation of pick-up/drop-off point between the gate and
the fire hydrant area and student parking parking (up on the hill toward Pauba Road).
Ms. Susan Besancon, 39520 Via De Oro, mother of a sophomore at the High School,
concurred with Mr. Thomas' suggestions to implement a pick-up/drop-off area.
Disagreeing with the Commission's recommendation, Mr. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico
Road, relayed his opposition to parking along Margarita Road and, therefore, suggested
the creation of a 200' loading/unloading zone immediately adjacent to the west gate
(south of the gate). Mr. Ray requested that the incompleted bike lane on the east side of
Margarita Road be completed; concurred that the 200' closest to Rancho Vista Road
should not be created as a drop-off zone; and suggested the creation of a bus lane
which should be separated by an island from Margarita Road; and questioned when the
proposed signal at Calle Vista would be installed. He suggested that this matter be
continued pending a joint City/School District meeting to further discuss parking and
traffic circulation around the High School.
Concurring with Mr. Ray's suggestion to create a 200' loading/unloading zone, Mayor
Roberts suggested that it be extended to 300' and suggested that the construction of the
stairwell leading to Rancho Vista Road be expedited.
6
For Mayor Roberrs, Public Works Director Kicak noted that the stairwell project could be
expedited and that because of an existing Metropolitan Water District facility, the
stairwell connection would have to placed southerly of the southwest corner.
Councilman Stone concurred with extending the zone to 300' and recommended that it
be placed south of the existing gate. Mr. Stone as well suggested that the joint City
Council/School Board Committee continue to discuss traffic circulation for the area of
discussion.
Although he would normally recommend that the proposed recommendation be
readdressed by the Traffic/Public Safety Commission, Councilman Comerchero noted
that in light of public safety and time, he would support the recommendation of a 300'
loading zone located southerly of the gate.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve a 300' loading zone to be located
southerly of the gate. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
Councilman Stone noted that he would not oppose if the Traffic/Public Safety
Commission were to review the City Council's recommendation and provide any
suggestions.
At 8:30 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services
District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 8:52 P.M., the City Council
resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
13
Parking In-Lieu Pro.Gram for Old Town Temecula (Planning Application No. PA98-
0472; Old Town Specific Plan Amendment establishin.q the Parking In-Lieu Program;
and PA97-0292: Parkin.cl In-Lieu Fee for Old Town Temecula)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC
REVISE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE
OF OLD TOWN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-
0472)
13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
7
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SETTING THE PARKING IN-LIEU FEE
WITHIN THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND
AUTHORIZING THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE FEE
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0292)
Councilman Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this Item.
Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per agenda
material).
In light of the City's upcoming purchase of the Stampede parking lot, Councilman
Lindemans suggested that the subcommittee, comprised of Mayor Pro Tem Ford and
Councilman Lindemans, be given the opportunity to further review this issue prior to
taking any action this evening.
Community Development Director Thornhill advised that without amending the Old Town
Specific Plan, the existing higher parking standards would have to be imposed.
In response to Councilman Comerchero, City Attorney Thorson noted that the In-Lieu
Fee could be regulated by the Redevelopment Agency.
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doc Laine, Main Street, merchant in Old Town, commended the City on the recent
streetscape improvements in Old Town. Mr. Laine questioned the parking space
marking process, noting that as a result of several unmarked areas on the west side of
Main Street, 11 on-street parking spaces have been lost. Public Works Director Kicak
noted that he would review his concern. Housing and Redevelopment Manager Meyer
noted that some of the unmarked spaces were set aside for bus stops but that some
appear to have been inappropriately mismarked.
Being of the opinion that the subcommittee should address this issue and present a
recommendation to the Council, Councilman Comerchero suggested that in the interim
period, a portion of the program should be approved.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the introduction of Ordinance No.
22 as modified in that the Ordinance shall remain in effect for a four-month period during
which the Subcommittee will review and address incentives and fees. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of Councilman Stone who had abstained.
If any issues were to arise during this four-month interim period, Councilman
Comerchero encouraged staff to apprise the Council.
City Attorney Thorson briefly reviewed the changes necessary to the ordinance to reflect
the Council's action.
8
Mayor Pro Tem Ford requested that a subcommittee meeting be scheduled and that a
staff member be in attendance.
14 Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-117
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1998-99, TO BE EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 6, 1999,
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESOLUTIONS 97-94 AND 98-
30
Senior Management Analyst Kuhns reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material),
clarifying the 11.1% calculation, advising that the proposed 10% is based on the
differential and not the actual fee, and noting that current .61 per square foot fee would
increase to .71 per square foot.
Councilman Lindemans voiced no objection to staff's recommendation but requested
that staff further review the possibility of amending the amount of fee per unit,
increasing the street system improvements fee and decreasing the park and recreation
improvements.
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing. There being no public
comments, the public hearing was closed.
Concurring with Councilman Lindemans' comments, Councilman Comerchero, echoed
by Councilman Stone, noted that the top priority should be on street system
improvements and that the per unit fee should be amended. Mr. Comerchero relayed
his support of staff's recommendation.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-117. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plannin.cl A.qreement
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve the City's participation in the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation
Planning Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (of record).
9
Mayor Pro Tem Ford, as a member of Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
(RCHCA), recommended that this matter be tabled to a future date, advising that the
Planning Agreement has been forwarded by the County and that it has not been ratified
by RCHCA. Being of the opinion that changes will be made to this Planning Agreement,
Mr. Ford further recommended to table this matter.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Ford moved to table this matter until specific issues between
the County and RCHCA have been resolved. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
16 Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Oral report from staff on status of annexation proposal.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Community Development Director Thornhill provided the Council with an update of the
proposed annexation with City Attorney Thorson providing clarification with regard to the
legal aspect of the annexation, including the setting of an election date and noting the
following:
- that LAFCO had continued the request for annexation until December 10,
1998;
- that LAFCO would be willing to permit the splitting of two votes but would
not be willing to permit two separate annexations;
- that the City must abide with two separate laws - Annexation law as well
as Proposition 218.
Although he is not in opposition to the annexation, Mr. Mike Meyer, 31871 Camino
Rosales, expressed his desire for a fair and legal annexation election. Mr. Meyer
requested that the Council approve the splitting of two votes - one for Redhawk and one
for Vail Ranch.
Echoing Mr. Meyer's comments, Mr. Ken Johnson, 44728 Corte Valencia, relayed his
support of two separate votes.
Councilman Lindemans, echoed by his fellow Councilmembers, relayed his support of
one annexation but two separate votes.
Community Services Director Parker, for Councilman Stone, provided clarification as to
why the City's services for Redhawk in comparison to the County are more expensive
because the developer is currently subsidizing vacant land and, therefore, the costs are
lower. He noted that once the annexation has been approved and the developer will no
longer be subsidizing the cost, the homeowner will be responsible for the full cost.
10
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that with regard to the Closed Session Items, No. 1 was
not considered and with regard to No. 2, there were no reportable actions taken.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:16 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
December 15, 1998, at 7:00 P.M.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
11
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the
amount of $4,122,171.47.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 12th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SE q
Resos 99-
STATE OF CALl FORN IA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula
on the 12th day of January, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 99-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
12/10/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/11/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/17/09 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/23/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/30/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/30/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/10/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
12/24/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01112/99 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
261 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYoCIP
300 VEHICLES FUND
320 SUPPORT SERVICES
330 FACILITIES
340 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
471 TCSD - DEBT SERVICE
$ 1,794,906.23
28,605.69
133,566.26
20,460.98
24,837.12
37,565.84
914.31
57.63
1,515,948.25
6,000.00
60,981.30
87,234.00
45,666.41
11,013.64
17.413.57
5,500.00
$ 920,472.25
44,058.26
744,955.91
241,575.03
669,899.26
1,169,710.52
173,417.62
158,082.62
$ 4,122,171.47
$ 3,790,671.23
100 GENERAL
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCS D
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
2;'J RDA-CIP
3LG INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
IPREPARED 15 TA WESTON ACCO~k WE_S~~E~A
-Z?~~C , .,' ,, LIST
GENIE RO
SH ITY MANAGER
238,639.61
6,722.16
57,670.68
138.67
352.36
4,459.30
1,166.38
3,284.41
1,411.89
6,705.28
3,424.18
7,525.32
331,500.24
$ 4,122,171.47
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98
11:39
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 12
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
111,252.20
2,667.75
24,306.69
448.29
104.35
3,031.93
434.41
666,385.18
17,609.34
79,414.13
5,060.91
2,523.45
7,233.62
TOTAL 920,472.25
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98
11:39
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53055
53056
53056
53056
53056
53056
53056
53056
53056
53057
53058
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
003365
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
003304
001281
A J FRICK CIVIL ENGINEE
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC,
ALHAMBRA GROUP
ARCHES AT ENTRANCE TO O.T.
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
COBRA/NELSON/GREEK DEC98
BILLBOARD ADVERTISING IN O.T,
PROF SRVCS-TEMECULA MUSEUM
280-199-999-5362
001-2310
165-2310
190-2310
193-2310
280-2310
300-2310
340-2310
001-1180
280-199-999-5362
210-190-808-5804
5,700.00
615.10
12.90
55.92
1.72
4.30
4.30
21.50
34.40
1,700.00
12.60
5,700.00
750.14
1,700.00
12.60
53059
53059
53060
53060
53060
53061
53062
53063
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
003474
003474
001323
001323
001323
003126
002829
002099
AMERICAN TIME & SIGNAL
AMERICAN TIME & SIGNAL
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS
BRIDGHAM, DENNIS
BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES
FIRE ALARM PULL DOWN GUARD-CRC
FREIGHT
DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
DRINKING WATER FOR MAINT. FAC
DRINKING WATER FOR CRC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:D.BRIDGHAM
DEC RESTROOM RENTAL IN O.T.
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
340-199-701-5250
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
001-1175
280-199-999-5234
379.80
9.73
197.41
88.57
40.25
96.00
1,586.08
826.00
389.53
326.23
96.00
1,586.08
826.00
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53064
53065
53066
53066
53066
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000128
000638
000638
000638
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV
CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV
CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
NOV WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
CREDIT:W/C MOD RATE DECREASE
LIABILITY INSURANCE RENEWAL 99
QTR 3 S.M.I. ASSESSMENTS
QTR 3 S.M.I. ASSESSMENTS
CITY'S 5% S.M.I. ASSESSMENTS
001-2370
165-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
194-2370
280-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
340-2370
280-199-999-5112
190-181-999-5112
001-164-604-5112
300-199-999-5200
001-2280
001-2290
001-162-4229
3,634.49
73.89
1,146.33
.82
2.10
51.84
7.01
39.27
8.10
52.62
17.40
322.92
10.82
.65
45.81-
78,288.00
6,784.23
4,598.53
569.14-
5,322.45
78,288.00
10,813.62
53067 12/10/98 003528 CANTER, MAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 240.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUHBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53067 12/10/98 003528 CANTER, MAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
240.00
480.00
53068 12/10/98 003349 CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG TROLLEY SERVICES IN OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
660.00
660.00
53069 12/10/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC INSTALL PANIC BUTTON - CRC 190-182-999-5250
53069 12/10/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC INSTALL PANIC BUTTON - CRC 190-182-999-5250
53069 12/10/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250
120.00
60.00
45.00
225.00
53070 12/10/98 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG. EFFECTI CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING 001-161-999-5261
3,556.50
3,556.50
53071 12/10/98 002989 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA CLEAN FRONT CANOPY-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250
45.00
45.00
53072 12/10/98 003478 CLOUD 9 LIMOUSINE SERVI LIMOUSINE SERVICE FOR PIANIST 280-199-999-5362
82.00
82.00
5307'3 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S 001-2330 22.00
53073 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 39.75
5307'3 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75
53073 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 66.50
53073 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 47.75
53073 12/10/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 107.02
322.77
53074 12/10/98 003328 COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, OCT LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-1990
53074 12/10/98 003328 COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, OCT LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-1990
53074 12/10/98 003328 COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES, OCT LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS 300-1990
104.09
252.46
264.59
621.14
53075 12/10/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS PERFORMANCES-HOLIDAY FEST. 280-199-999-5362
53075 12/10/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS PERFORMANCES-HOLIDAY FEST. 280-199-999-5362
53075 12/10/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS SANTA FOR HOLIDAY FESTIVITIES 280-199-999-5362
300.00
250.00
200.00
750.00
53076 12/10/98 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS INSTALL PANIC BUTTON-TCC 190-184-999-5250
53076 12/10/98 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM BATTERIES 320-199-999-5242
53076 12/10/98 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242
80.00
284.00
22.01
386.01
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS-SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS -CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS- CRC 190-182-999-5212
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS - TCC 190-184-999-5212
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL PRODUCTS-PARKS 190-180-999-5212
53077 12/10/98 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-6TH ST PKG 001-164-603-5218
53.44
90.20
75.32
53.44
94.71
31.57
398.68
53078 12/10/98 003179 CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION C/O #2 SIDEWALK IMPROV.PW97-02 210-165-677-5804
53079 12/10/98 003059 COSTCO COMPANIES, INC MEMBERSHIP DUES:98/99 001-140-999-5226
53079 12/10/98 003059 COSTCO COMPANIES, INC MEMBERSHIP DUES:98/99 190-180-999-5226
2,700.00
35.00
25.00
2,700.00
60.00
53080 12/10/98 003059 COSTCO COMPANIES, INC
53081 12/10/98 003052 COUNTESSES & NOBLEMEN
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:B.PATTISON 001-1175
ENTERTAINMENT-BRKFST W/SANTA 190-183-999-5370
2,000.00
150.00
2,000.00
150.00
53082 12/10/98 002932 CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE INSTALL CARPET -MAINT FAC. 210-190-158-5804 785.00 785.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53083 12/10/98 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140
82.50
82.50
53084 12/10/98 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-164-601-5218
31.99
31.99
53085 12/10/98 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE DOOR, IN RES IMPROV. PRGM:TINSLEY
165-199-813-5804
750.00
750,00
53086 12/10/98 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
NOV SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 300-2180
174.36
174.36
53087 12/10/98 002466 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY CITY HALL ELEVATOR SVC.& MTNC. 340-199-701-5212
202.00
202.00
53088 12/10/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 WILLIAM 001-162-999-5118
53088 12/10/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 WILLIAM 001-161-999-5118
53088 12/10/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 YONKER 001-140-999-5118
53088 12/10/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 MYERS 001-171-999-5118
53089 12/10/98 003150
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
53090 12/10/98 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION
53091 12/10/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:MARG.PARK
OCT PROF SRVCS-MARG WIDENING
LDSC IMPROV. R.CAL/REISLIN
210-2038
210-165-681-5804
193-180-999-5212
544.50
544.50
1,232.70
1,891.80
60,484.03
1,702.50
97.62
4,213.50
60,484.03
1,702.50
97.62
53092 12/10/98 000165
53092 12/10/98 000165
53092 12/10/98 000165
53092 12/10/98 000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
280-199-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
001-111-999-5270
25.50
10.75
60.00
19.75
116.00
53093 12/10/98 003347
53093 12/10/98 003347
53093 12/10/98 003347
53093 12/10/98 003347
53093 12/10/98 003347
53093 12/10/98 003347
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 1E/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
53094 12/10/98 002002
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. C0
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
5477-2590-3378-9913 GR-NOV
5477-2590-3379-0515 DU NOV
5477-2590-3379-0515 DU NOV
5477-2592-2370-1405 GT NOV
5477-2590-0803-1143 HP NOV
5477-2590-0803-1143 HP NOV
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
001-140-999-5258
001-161-999-5258
001-161-999-5261
001-161-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5263
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
001-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
2.27
276.86
395.00
49.79
92.12
12.56
742.50
18.00
136.35
.45
1.35
14.85
5.85
9.OO
4.50
18.00
9.00
21.15
1,407.11
43.97
234.43
.90
2.29
27.77
828.60
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98
11:39
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53094
53096
53096
53096
53096
53096
53096
53096
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
909-308-1079 NOV GENERAL USAGE
909-676-3526 NOV CITY F.ALARM
909-693-0956 NOV GENERAL USAGE
909-694-4356 NOV HINTERGARDT
909-694-8927 NOV GENERAL USAGE
909-695-1409 NOV GENERAL USAGE
909-695-3539 NOV GENERAL USAGE
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
165-2500
190-2500
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
7.57
19.44
8.58
44.71
8.91
32.13
1,511.74
47.24
251.84
.97
2.46
29.84
8.12
20.89
9.21
48.03
9.57
34.53
57.72
83.62
83.41
30.85
27.88
90.04
38.90
4,793.25
412.42
53097
53098
53098
53098
53099
53100
53101
53101
53102
53103
53104
53105
53105
53105
53105
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
003531
000177
000177
000177
000175
001697
002220
002220
002372
000388
000194
000194
000194
000194
GATEWAY
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI
HALL, NANCY LEE
HAM RADIO OUTLET, INC
HAM RADIO OUTLET, INC
HARMON, JUDY
HILTON, MARIA
I C B O, INC.
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:A.ELMO
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
CAFR AWARD APPLICATION FEE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
RADIOS FOR ST #84 E.O.C.
SALES TAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND:LIVE T.V. TAPING
PUBLICATIONS:MEANS OF EGRESS
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
001-1175
190-180-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-184-999-5220
001-1990
190-183-999-5330
320-1950
320-1950
190-183-999-5330
190-183-4986
001-162-999-5228
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
1,674.44
338.71
30.18
53.25
415.00
204.80
1,919.40
148.75
503.60
IO.O0
129.30
1,556.24
18.76
184.00
31.44
1,674.44
422.14
415.00
204.80
2,068.15
503.60
10.00
129,30
1,790.44
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53106 12/10/98 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN
001-2140
282.01
282.01
53107 12/10/98 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC.
PARTY JUMP-WINTER WONDERLAND 190-183-999-5370
95.00
95.00
53108 12/10/98 KIZZIAR, CARYN
REFUND:WOMEN'S SELF DEFENSE 190-183-4982
25.00
25.00
53109 12/10/98 003361 KODL SOUNDS
ENTERTAINMENT:HOLIDAY PARTY 001-150-999-5265
425.00
425.00
53110 12/10/98 002779 KUHNS, ALLIE
REIMB:OCT/NOV CITY BUS. CALLS 001-110-999-5208
40.65
40.65
53111 12/10/98 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR P.W. 001-164-601-5218
111.28
111.28
53112 12/10/98 003469 LABAHN, PETER A.
REIMB:SISTER CITY VISIT EXP. 001-101-999-5280
86.74
86.74
53113 12/10/98 LOYCE, ROCKY REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
53114 12/10/98 001689 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS RELEASE RETENTION:PW97-23
53115 12/10/98 002784 MAILBOX, THE SUBSCRIPTION:TCSD
210-2035
190-180-999-5228
10,496.90
24.95
10,496.90
24.95
53116 12/10/98 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MSA MTG 12/17 P.W.,CIP, L.DEV. 001-163-999-5260
53116 12/10/9~ 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MSA MTG 12/17 P.W.,CIP, L.DEV. 001-165-999-5260
53116 12/10/98 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MSA MTG 12/17 P.W.,CIP, L.DEV. 001-164-604-5260
60.00
30.00
150.00
240.00
53117 12/10/98 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/22 BELIAN 001-162-999-5118
777.87
777.87
53118 12/10/98 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
369.60
369.60
53119 12/10/98 001205 MCDERMOTT, TIM K.
53120 12/10/98 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:T.MCDERMOTT
PROMOTER-OT CHRISTMAS/HOLIDAYS
001-1175
280-199-999-5362
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 300-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340
53121 12/10/98 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP COBRA/FLAMMER/NELSON/GREEK 001-1180
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:Z.SMITH 001-140-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CARDS:EDWARDS/CONNERTON 001-164-602-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CARDS:MAXWELL/GUILLOT 001-165-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-164-602-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-165-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:THORNSLEY/PREISENDAN 001-161-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS FOIL BUS.CARDS:D.U. & G.T. 001-161-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:P. RUSE 190-180-999-5222
2,000.00
1,080.00
2,551.56
97.79
270.36
20.87
58.67
19.55
78.23
184.73
38.25
2.96
205.00
76.50
15.89
5.93
76.50
205.00
21.82
102.50
2,000.00
1,080.00
3,281.76
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53122 12/10/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222
7.94
758.29
53123 12/10/98 002497 MISCO (3)DISKETTE TRAYS 320-199-999-5221
53123 12/10/98 002497 MISCO FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
83.85
10.61
94.46
53124 12/10/98 001214 MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO SOUND SYSTEM FOR THE PARADE
53125 12/10/98 003443 MURRIETA OAKS NURSERY 14 TREES FOR COSMIC DRIVE
190-183-999-5370
210-165-677-5804
1,300.00
628.40
1,300.00
628.40
53126 12/10/98 003038 NATIONAL PUBLIC EMPLOYE MEMBERSHIP DUES
001-150-999-5226
160.00
160.00
53127 12/10/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 001-163-999-5214
36.59
36.59
53128 12/10/98 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER MISC PHONE EQUIPMENT FOR CITY 320-199-999-5242
53128 12/10/98 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER MISC PHONE EQUIPMENT FOR CITY 320-199-999-5242
108.49
67.36
175.85
53129 12/10/98 000733 PARTY PZAZZ
RENTALS FOR TREE LIGHTING FEST 280-199-999-5362
26.67
26.67
53130 12/10/98 PEREA, ROSE REFUND:LIVE T.V. TAPING 190-183-4986
10.00
10.00
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 001-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
53131 12,'10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
53131 12/10/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390
322.43
22,733.66
582.98
3,806.97
13.31
33.93
418.77
113.56
264.88
143.65
723.40
142,40
527.78
263.61
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
72.08
1.87
14.08
.05
.14
1.54
.61
.92
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
3 O, 244.24
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11:39
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 1~/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
53133 12/10/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV
53134 12/10/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
53135
53135
53135
53135
53135
53135
53135
53135
53135
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIHBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
300-2090
001-2090
190-2090
191-2090
192-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2122
001-101-999-5280
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5222
001-111-999-5269
001-120-999-5277
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5261
001-150-999-5260
001-150-999-5265
ITEM
AMOUNT
484.77
214.33
71.43
1,126.54
361.15
1.05
844.51
39.45
5,886.33
783.85
15.53
51.23
411.42
248.40
1.83
155.25
834.33
2,392.15
148.83
3,607.57
780.80
19.10
16.00
2,346.53
944.70
111.62
100.79
33.59
3.48
52.07
377.93
38.88
13.35
18.90
152.56
33.90
1.78
117.47
944.70-
73.84
73.45
28.21
9.70
18.45
12.34
10.76
9.16
12.49
88.65
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
21,898.70
73.84
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98 11:39
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
53135 12/10/98 000249
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5230
001-162-999-5261
001-162-999-5222
001-164-601-5260
001-164-601-5250
001-170-999-5292
001-171-999-5220
001-171-999-5261
001-171-999-5296
280-199-999-5362
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5254
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5370
190-181-999-5301
40.09
20.00
45.00
10.98
15.00
9.52
13.34
45.01
25.00
91.14
52.95
23.14
4.54
15.00
40.95
31.09
150.18
9.82
905.96
53137 12/10/98
PICHON, KIMBERLY
REFUND:WINTER WONDERLAND BOOTH 190-183-4992
30.00
30. O0
53138 12/10/98 000254
53138 12/10/98 000254
53138 12/10/98 000254
53138 12/10/98 000254
53138 12/10/98 000254
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PUBLIC NOTICES:PW95-11
PUBLIC NOTICES:PW97-29
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICES:98-21
PUBLIC HEARING
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
114.54
98.67
17.75
9.25
19.00
259.21
53139 12/10/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
53139 12/10/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
5002330-8 CITY VAN OCT
5001377-0 SR VAN OCT
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
27.59
43.07
70.66
53140 lZ/10/98 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC.
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
320-199-999-5221
23.23
23.23
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
53141 12/10/98 000262
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
01-06-26305-0:FRONT ST LDSC
01-06-27924-2 MORENO RD
01-06-27999-1:MORENO RD -DC
01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST LDSC
01-06-55015-O:FRONT ST LDSC
01-02-98000-O:PAUBA RD.
01-02-98010-O:PAUBA RD
01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST LDSC
01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
001-164-603-5240
190-1990
190-1990
001-164-603-5240
001-164-603-5240
001-171-999-5240
001-171-999-5240
001-164-603-5240
280-199-807-5801
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-184-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
31.32
68.80
32.62
34.45
52.14
9.28
162.37
24.65
40.58
3,177.57
97.18
465.22
143.68
132.58
1,844.56
332.18
6,649.18
53142 12/10/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-999-5214 36.50
53142 12/10/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DETAIL 001-163-999-5214 12.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53142 12/10/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DETAIL 001-164-604-5214 10.00
58.50
53143 12/10/98 003529 RANCHO VERDE HIGH SCHO0 PARTICIPATION IN X-MAS PARADE 190-183-999-5370
3O0.OO
300.00
53144 12/10/98 003517 REBEL EQUIPMENT RENTAL RENTAL OF EQUIP. FOR OLD TOWN 001-164-601-5238
255.00
255.00
53145 12/10/98 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE SUPERVISORS ACADEMY 280-199-999-5261 450.00
53145 12/10/98 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE SUPERVISORS ACADEMY 001-140-999-5261 450.00
53145 12/10/98 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE SUPERVISORS ACADEMY 001-110-999-5261 450.00
53145 12/10/98 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE SUPERVISORS ACADEMY 001-171-999-5261 450.00
1,800.00
53146 12/10/98 002907 REINHART-FONTES ASSOC., COMMERCIAL APPRAISALS-FRONT ST 280-199-999-5250 4,500.00
4,500.00
53147 12/10/98 000266 RIGHTWAY TRASH CONTAINERS:HALLOWEEN 190-180-999-5238 32.33
32.33
53148 12/10/98 000418 RIVERSIDE C0. CLERK & R NOTARY PUBLIC REG. FILING FEE 001-120-999-5226
35.00
35.00
53149 12/10/98 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R NOTICE OF DETERMINATION:BASIN 190-180-999-5416 1,328.00
1,328.00
53150 1~/10/98 000268 RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT NOV K-RAT FEES COLLECTED
001-2300 1,305.00 1,305.00
53151 12/10/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING 001-150-999-5254 290.95
53151 12/10/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING 001-150-999-5254 8.05
53151 12/10/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING 001-150-999-5254 341.55
640.55
53152 12/10/98 003524 SCHWARZ, SCOTT F. & TER SETTLEMENT:GRADING AGREEMENT 001-164-601-5401
5,000.00
5,000.00
53153 12/10/98 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA MISC POOL SUPPLIES - TES 190-180-999-5212 164.20
164.20
53154 12/10/98 003062 SIGN XPRESS MISC SIGNS AND SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5362 10.78
10.78
53155 12/10/98 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. TURKEY BOWL SUPPLIES:TEAM PACE 001-2175 41.82
41.82
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOOTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-5153 PUJOL ST 190-184-999-5240 592.04
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 3,929.58
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-11-577-1966-VIA EDUARDO 190-199-999-5240 24.10
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 69-77-578-0218-01-SANTIAGO RD 191-180-999-5319 24.54
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-671-5518 PALA RD 191-180-999-5319 140.47
53156 12/10/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 65-77-804-6630-01-RAINBOW CNYN 191-180-999-5319 114.83
53157 12/10/98 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON ELECT SRVCS-O.T. STREET SCAPE 280-199-824-5804 297.48
4,825.56
297.48
53158 12/10/98 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF MUNICIPA MEMBERSHIP DUES:H.PARKER 190-180-999-5226 25.00
53158 12/10/98 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF MUNICIPA MEMBERSHIP DUES:CROWE-PELLETIE 190-180-999-5226 25.00
53158 12/10/98 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF MUNICIPA MEMBERSHIP DUES:L.AMAV[SCA 190-180-999-5226 25.00
53158 12/10/98 000282 SOUTHERN CAL[F MUNICIPA MEMBERSHIP DUES:J.LAWRENCE '99 190-180-999-5226 25.00
100.00
53159 12/10/98 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF MUNICIPA SOFTBALL SEM:1/14 L.A,J.L,J.W 190-183-999-5380
60.00
60.00
53160 12/10/98 003321 SOUTHERN CALIF. COLLECT OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING 280-199-999-5362 275.00 275.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
12/10/98 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
53161 12/10/98 003496 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI RELOCATE:OVERLAND FACILITIES 210-165-604-5804 589,431.68 589,431.68
53162 12/10/98 STARBUCK, ART REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
53163 12/10/98 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST-AID SUPPLIES - CRC
190-182-999-5301 144.25 144.25
53164 12/10/98 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370 84.87 84.87
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 534.24
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 1.03
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 14.35
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 3.07
53165 12/10/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 19.26
656.00
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 001-1020 3,621.50
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 165-1020 271.25
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 190-1020 480.00
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 280-1020 183.75
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 300-1020 9.50
53166 12/10/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 320-1020 350.00
4,916.00
53167 12/10/98 003527 THOMAS, AMY COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:A.THOMAS 001-1175 1,874.79
1,874.79
53168 12/10/98 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5220 58.86
58.86
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 181.40
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 163.60
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 7.68
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 .34
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 1.70
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 3.40
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.68
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 186.20-
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 168.40
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 7.68
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 .34
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 1.69
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 3.40
53169 12/10/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.69
362.80
53170 12/10/98 000420 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN OCT PROF SRVCS-MARG/OVERLAND 210-165-681-5802
144.07
144.07
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF
C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 6,741.32
C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 272.73
C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,282.72
C 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 2.50
C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 33.18
C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 24.99
C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 106.06
VOUCHRE2
12/10/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11:39
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53171 12/10/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53172
53172
53172
53172
53172
53172
53172
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53173
53174
53174
53174
53175
53175
53175
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
12/10/98
53176
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
002702
000325
000325
000325
000409
000409
000409
003525
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
001342
002109
002109
000345
000345
000345
53177
53177
53177
53177
53177
53177
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, I
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY: I
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, I
VEDENTE, JAMES I. & KRI
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
~AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
XEROX
XEROX
XEROX
CORPORATION BILLI
CORPORATION BILLI
CORPORATION BILLI
53178
53178
53179
53179
53179
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
MISC SUPPLIES FOR MAINT CREW
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
CFD 88-12 REIMBURSEMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SEN CNTR
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
DEC LEASE FOR TCC COPIER
DEC COPIER LEASE 5100A
DEC COPIER LEASE 5100A
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
001-100-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-1990
001-164-604-5230
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601-5242
001-2030
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
190-184-999-5239
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
ITEM
AMOUNT
83.33
646.53
158.33
740.54
160.75
582.32
56,09
76.38
59.96
76.14
1.32
168.40
222.06
74.54
269.38
218.95
1,760.12
45.52
545.14
2.24
594.43
127.50
.50
27.00
214.80
5.07
16.65
201.75
297.35
59.15
89,92
126.82
141.91
188.12
54.09
4.57
67.08
1,701.80
418.23
PAGE 11
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,351.69
1,752.18
3,902.10
155.00
236.52
201.75
903.27
58.66
2,187.11
TOTAL CHECKS 920,472.25
VOUCHRE2
12/11/98
10:56
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
AMOUNT
6,712.70
440.95
36,893.86
10.75
TOTAL 44,058.26
VOUCHRE2
12/11/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53182
53183
53183
53183
53183
53183
53183
53183
53183
53183
53184
53184
53184
53184
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53185
53186
53187
53188
53189
53190
53190
53191
53192
53192
53192
53192
53192
53192
10:56
CHECK
DATE
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
12/11/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002990
003150
003150
003150
003150
003150
003150
003150
003150
003150
000165
000165
000165
000165
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
003347
000184
003462
001550
002890
001384
001384
002111
002899
002899
002899
002899
002899
002899
VENDOR
NAME
DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GOLD "N" BAKED HONEY HA
GROSSMONT BANK
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TE
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
TOGO'S
UNISTRUT
UNISTRUT
UNISTRUT
UNISTRUT
UNISTRUT
UNISTRUT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
RETAIN PUBLIC ADVOCACY FIRM
C/O #1-5 MARG COMM PARK
PRGS PMT #7-MARG COMM PARK
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:MARG PARK
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:RCP BLOCK
RETENTION W/H PMT #7;MARG PARK
STOP NOTICE:MARG. COMM PARK
STOP NOTICE W/H MARG. COMM PRK
STOP NOTICE:MARG. COMM PARK
STOP NOTICE:MARG. COMM. PARKS
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
5477-2590-4220-7824 JC NOV
5477-2590-3378-9798 JS NOV
5477-2590-3378-9798 JS NOV
5477-2590-3378-9152 KL NOV
5477-2590-3378-9277 RR NOV
5477-2590-3378-9277 RR NOV
5477-2590-3378-9830 RB NOV
5477-2590-3378-9830 RB NOV
5477-2590-3379-6165 GY NOV
5477-2590-3379-6165 GY NOV
5477-2590-3379-6165 GY NOV
909-506-2626 NOV SUBSTATION
REFRESHMENTS COUNCIL MEETING
RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT:EDGE
909-223-1667/317-6491-POLICE
FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:S. BATES
SALES TAX
REFRESHMENTS-TEM. ONE MTG
SIGN POSTS & HARDWARE FOR P.W.
SIGN POSTS & HARDWARE FOR P.W.
FREIGHT
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5248
210-190-119-5804
210-190-119-5804
210-2038
210-2038
210-2035
210-2038
210-2038
210-2038
210-2038
001-163-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5263
001-110-999-5258
001-110-999-5278
001-101-999-5280
001-150-999-5260
001-170-999-5229
001-100-999-5260
210-1035
001-170-999-5208
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-110-999-5223
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,000.00
52,560.21
125,682.54
60,484.03
7,315.53
17,824.28-
727.24-
140,621.65-
7,315.53-
60,484.03-
12.50
10.75
19.50
12.50
17.96
232.16
32.31
63.70
229.55
266.05
60.47
259.24
49.14
1,242.22
62.63
340.86
26.25
17,824.28
139.84
102.50
7.94
99,02
1,253.60
362.90
105.10
30.43
97.16
28.12
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,000.00
19,069.58
55.25
2,515.43
340.86
26.25
17,824.28
139.84
110.44
99.02
1,877.31
TOTAL CHECKS 44,058.26
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/HOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
94,905.26
12,724.07
26,820.59
10,991.42
24t658.40
5,824.35
227.45
529,639.16
24,653.61
373.61
8,408.84
lt330.23
4,398.92
TOTAL 744,955.91
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53193
53194
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
54079
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
61449
912049
12:57
CHECK
DATE
12/14/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/16/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003541
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000166
VENDOR
NAME
UC REGENTS/CONNECT
LIGHTNING CORPORATION
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
AWARDS LUNCH:12/16 RR,RB,BH,JS
VIDEO DUPLICATION:PARADE 98
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
PROPERTY ACQUISITION:OVRLD PRJ
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5260
190-180-999-5250
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
210-165-604-5700
ITEM
AMOUNT
260.00
359.89
39.37
2.29
38.79
.93
5.09
4.00
5.08
5,339.58
143.11
1,062.32
1.53
3.66
71.26
10.54
58.7O
18.15
176.45
27.71
134.30
19,471.51
411.46
4,398.46
8.79
22.29
355.79
73.52
164.16
48.86
779.47
154,01
624.58
4,744.19
127.02
1,060.70
2.44
6.22
82.38
20.77
6O.58
25.69
165.88
52.78
137.27
200,000.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
260.00
359.89
7,142.86
32,998.82
200,000.00
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98 12:57
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK'
NUMBER DATE
53197 12/17/98
53198 12/17/98
53199 12/17/98
53200 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53201 12/17/98
53202 12/17/98
53202 12/17/98
53202 12/17/98
53203 12/17/98
53204 12/17/98
53205 12/17/98
53206 12/17/98
53207 12/17/98
53208 12/17/98
53209 12/17/98
53210 12/17/98
53211 12/17/98
53212 12/17/98
53213 12/17/98
53214 12/17/98
53214 12/17/98
53215 12/17/98
53215 12/17/98
53215 12/17/98
53216 12/17/98
53216 12/17/98
53216 12/17/98
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
003304
ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC.
AKERS, JULIE
001947 AMERIGAS
003377
ANTIQUE & COLLECTABLES
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
003485
003485
003485
AUDIO VIDEO SUPPLY, INC
AUDIO VIDEO SUPPLY, INC
AUDIO VIDEO SUPPLY, INC
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SY
003494 C C N PRODUCTIONS
000154 C S M F 0
000154 C S M F 0
003138 CAL MAT
003214 CAL MAT
000790 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PEST
001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
003526 CARL ADAMS CONSTRUCTION
003349 CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG
002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS
002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS
002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BILLBOARD ADVERTISING:O.T.
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
MICROFILM STORAGE SUPPLIES
AUDIO TECHNICA MICROPHONE
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MEMBERSHIP DUES:L. SULLENS
ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING
WIRELESS IFB FOR PARADE VIDEO
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
MB:T.MCDERMOTT & B. PATTISON
A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT
A.C, FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINT.
PESTICIDE CERT. K.HARRINGTON
RENTAL:HELIUM/BALLOON BLOWER
INSPECT/CERT. O.T. ARCHWAYS
TROLLEY SERVICES FOR OLD TOWN
PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS
R.BRADLEY-RETIREMENT BREAKFAST
ALARM MONITORING - CRC
INSTALL PANIC BUTTON:SEN CNTR
INSTALL PANIC BUTTON:SEN CNTR
(IO)DOZEN SOFTBALLS
FREIGHT CHARGE
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-999-5362
190-2900
001-162-999-5263
280-199-999-5362
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
001-120-999-5277
320-199-999-5210
320-199-999-5210
320-199-999-5210
190-180-999-5214
320-199-999-5261
190-180-999-5250
001-150-999-5254
001-140-999-5226
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5226
190-184-999-5301
280-199-824-5801
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5260
001-150-999-5265
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
ITEM
AMOUNT
340.80
100.00
53.93
419.90
473.85
16.24
40.60
52.00
8.00
20.00
432.00
5.61
33.48
52.00
600.00
50.00
160.00
200.00
1,028.21
1,300.05
30.00
10.10
4,500.00
660.00
130.60
900.00
50.00
30.00
60.00
340.00
35.00
26.35
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
340.80
100.00
53.93
419.90
610.69
471.09
52.00
600.00
50.00
160.00
200.00
1#028.21
1,300.05
30.00
10.10
4,500.00
660.00
1,030.60
140.00
401.35
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98
12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53217
53218
53218
53219
53219
53220
53220
53220
53220
53220
53221
53221
53221
53221
53222
53223
53223
53223
53223
53223
53223
53224
53225
53226
53227
53228
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
53229
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
003534
003328
003328
002147
002147
000442
000442
000442
000442
000442
002405
002405
002405
002405
003052
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
002390
002712
003291
003150
002060
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
CLOUD PRODUCTIONS
COMPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
COHPEX LEGAL SERVICES,
COMPLIMENTS# COMPLAINTS
COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC
COUNTESSES & NOBLEMEN
E S
E S
E S
E S
E S
E S
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN
ED HILL CONSTRUCTION
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
PRODUCTION SRVCS-PARADE VIDEO
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES:JEFF CLARK
OCT LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
HOLIDAY PERFORMANCES-OLD TOWN
SANTA FOR HOLIDAY FESTIVITIES
RELOCATE FIRE ALARM PULL DOWN
CHECK AND REPAIR PROXIMITY
ALARM MONITORING - CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING-MTNC.FACILITY
ALARM MONITORING - TCC
BATTERIES FOR DELTEC UPS
LABOR
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
ENTERTAINMENT-BRKFST W/SANTA
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 DONAHOE
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 YONKER
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 DEGANGE
DIEGO DR LDSC WATER SERVICES
ECONOMIC CONSULTING SERVICES
CONST.INSPECTION SRVCS-MARG PK
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:MARG PARK
COUNCIL MEETING REFRESHMENTS
LDSC IMPROV. NICOLAS PARK
LDSC IMPROV. NOCOLAS PARK
LDSC IMPROV. VETERANS PARK
LDSC IMPROV. VILLAGES
LDSC IMPROV. VILLAGES
LDSC IMPROV. VILLAGES
LDSC IMPROV. VILLAGES
LDSC IMPROV. VINTAGE HILLS
LDSC IMPROV. VINTAGE HILLS
LDSC IMPROV. RANCHO MIRADA
LDSC IMPROV. SAM HICKS
LDSC IMPROV. RANCHO VISTA
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
190-180-999-5250
300-1990
300-1990
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
210-190-158-5804
210-190-158-5804
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-184-999-5250
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
190-183-999-5370
001-163-999-5118
00T-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
193-180-999-5240
001-111-999-5248
210-190-119-5804
210-2038
001-100-999-5260
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
430.81
30.40
119.55
250.00
200.00
58.00
145.00
210.00
135.00
210.00
370.00
360.00
26.47
28.68
150.00
220.20
220.20
440.40
2,996.80
1,097.84
2,858.40
159.96
1,000.00
707.00
140,621.65
151.76
168.80
180.00
200.00
120.00
75.00
150.00
60.00
165.00
300.00
250.00
160.00
60.00
400.00
430.81
149.95
450.00
758.00
785.15
150.00
7,833.84
159.96
1,000.00
707.00
140,621.65
151.76
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98 12:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
53229 12/17/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. LOMA LINDA
LDSC IMPROV. LOMA LINDA
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. MEADOWVIEW
LDSC IMPROV. RANCHO VISTA
193-180-999-5212 250.00
193-180-999-5212 350.00
190-180-999-5415 75.00
190-180-999-5415 200.00
193-180-999-5212 900.00
193-180-999-5212 108.00
193-180-999-5212 50.00
193-180-999-5212 375.00
193-180-999-5212 100.00
193-180-999-5212 120.00
190-180-999-5416 547.00
5,363.80
53230 12/17/98 001313 FAGAN, MATTHEW
GUITAR PERFORMANCE IN OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
300.00
300.00
53231 12/17/98 000478 FAST SIGNS
LETTERING:SPECIAL EVENT BANNER 190-180-999-5254
34.22
34.22
53232 12/17/98 000165
53232 12/17/98 000165
53232 12/17/98 000165
53232 12/17/98 000165
53232 12/17/98 000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
280-199-999-5230 17.25
001-162-999-5230 47.50
190-180-999-5230 45.50
001-165-999-5230 13.75
001-150-999-5230 12.50
136.50
53233 12/17/98 002832 FENCE BUILDERS
RES IMPROV, PRGM:ROMBAL
165-199-813-5804 2,795.00 2,795.00
53234 12/17/98 000166
53234 12/17/98 000166
53234 12/17/98 000166
53234 12/17/98 000166
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
LOT BOOK REPORT:FALLING CREEK
LOT BOOK REPORT:RUSTIC GLEN
LOT BODK REPORT:VIA PUERTA
LOT BOOK REPORT:CAMINO DEL EST
165-199-813-5804 150.00
165-199-813-5804 150.00
165-199-813-5804 150.00
165-199-813-5804 150.00
600.00
53235 12/17/98 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
001-150-999-5250 85.00 85.00
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FREIGHT
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FREIGHT
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SALES TAX
53236 12/17/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SALES TAX
001-163-999-5220 11.52
001-164-604-5220 46.08
001-163-999-5220 .50
001-164-604-5220 2.00
001-163-999-5220 .89
001-164-604-5220 3.54
64.53
53237 12/17/98 000184
53237 12/17/98 000184
53237 12/17/98 000184
53237 12/17/98 000184
53237 12/17/98 000184
53238 12/17/98 001355
53238 12/17/98 001355
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
909-506-1941 DEC T.T.A
909-695-1178 NOV MARG COMM PRK
909-699-0590 NOV TTA ALARM
909 699-1370 SVC FOR COP
909-699-2811 DEC GENERAL USAGE
MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE
MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE
320-199-999-5208 56.47
320-199-999-5208 348.98
320-199-999-5208 58.30
001-110-999-5223 115.00
320-199-999-5208 1~506.52
320-199-999-5208 320.00
320-199-999-5208 320.00
2,085.27
640.00
53239 12/17/98 001937
53239 12/17/98 001937
53239 12/17/98 001937
53239 12/17/98 001937
GALLS, INC.
GALLS, INC.
GALLS, INC.
GALLS, INC.
CELL PHONE CARRYING CASES
CELL PHONE CARRYING CASES
CELL PHONE CARRYING CASES
FREIGHT
001-163-999-5242 25.98
001-165-999-5242 25.98
001-164-604-5242 25.98
001-163-999-5242 2.66
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98 12:57
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
53239 12/17/98 001937 GALLS, INC.
53239 12/17/98 001937 GALLS, INC.
53240 12/17/98 002141 GELS, PAUL
53241 12/17/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M.
53242 12/17/98 002528 GLASS BLASTERS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
FREIGHT 001-165-999-5242
FREIGHT 001-164-604-5242
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214
NOV PROF SRVCS-PALA RD BRIDGE 210-165-631-5801
CITY SEAL MUGS FOR NEW HIRES
53243 12/17/98 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI GFOA CF:1/25-29 T.M. & B.P.
53244 12/17/98 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM MONITORING: POLICE
53245 12/17/9~ 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
53245 12/17/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
53245 12/17/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
53245 12/17/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
53245 12/17/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
53245 12/17/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC.
001-150-999-5265
001-140-999-5258
001-170-999-5229
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212
SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
53246 12/17/98 001013 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS. 001-140-999-5248
53247 12/17/98 002787 IDENTICATOR CORPORATION REPLACE FINGERPRINT INK PADS 001-170-999-5229
53247 12/17/98 002787 IDENTICATOR CORPORATION FREIGHT 001-170-999-5229
53247 12/17/98 002787 IDENTICATOR CORPORATION SALES TAX 001-170-999-5229
53248 12/17/98 IMANI TEMPLE CHURCH OF REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
53249 12/17/98 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES 320-199-999-5250
53250 12/17/98 003319 INLAND ENTERTAINMENT RO ADVERTISING FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362
53251 12/17/98 003404 INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION POWER SWEEPING & DEBRIS REMVAL 280-199-999-5362
53252 12/17/98 001186 IRWIN, JOHN
53253 12/17/98 IVMAA C/O SEAN LEVIN
53253 12/17/98 IVMAA C/O SEAN LEVIN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MEMBERSHIP:J.LAWRENCE
MEMBERSHIP:L.AMAVISCA
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5261
001-162-999-5248
53254 12/17/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN CREDIT:OVERCHARGE ON P/C FEE
53254 12/17/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SERVCS -BLDG/SAFETY 001-162-999-5248
JARKA, KELLE
JARKA, KELLE
53255 12/17/98
53255 12/17/98
53256 12/17/98 003538 JIBWORKS
53257 12/17/98 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
53257 12/17/98 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
JOHNSTON, HOLLY
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOM RENTAL 190-2900
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOM RENTAL 190-183-4990
PARADE VIDEO EQUIP,/OPERATOR
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
190-180-999-5250
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
REFD GRADING PRMT: LD98-O28GR 001-2670
53258 12/17/98
ITEM
AMOUNT
2.66
2.67
265.00
5,000.00
15.09
909.00
55.50
150.00
42.61
1,490.00
100.00
123.23
437.00
2,400.00
246.00
4.95
19.07
100.00
135.00
256.50
524.00
620.00
12.00
12.00
346.47-
612.87
100.00
42.50
950.00
82.80
82.80
2,000.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
85.93
265.00
5,000.00
15.09
909.00
55.50
2,342.84
2,400.00
270.02
100.00
135.00
256.50
524.00
620.00
24.00
266.40
142.50
950.00
165.60
2,000.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/17/98 12:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53259 12/17/98 002310 ICANIGOWSK[, JERZY
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM:KANIGOWSKI 001-1175
2,000.00
2,000.00
53260 12/17/98 002531 KATY-FM RADIO
RADIO ADVERTISING-O T PROMOS 280-199-999-5362
867.00
867.00
53261 12/17/98 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 10/4 FOWLER 330-199-999-5118
65.00
65.00
53262 12/17/98 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP ~/E 10/25 MOBERG 001-150-999-5118
53262 12/17/98 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP (2)~/E 11/29 AGUIRRE 001-150-999-5118
81.90
280.80
362.70
53263 12/17/98 000206 KINKO'S, INC. STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370
53263 12/17/98 000206 KINKO'S, INC. STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370
53263 12/17/98 000206 KINKO'S, INC. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370
222.50
8.51
17.24
248.25
53264 12/17/98 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
19Q-182-999-5212
294.89
294.89
53265 12/17/98 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. BUS:DAYCAMP TRIP TO KNOTTS 190-183-999-5350
53265 12/17/98 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. CREDIT:INVOICE PAID PRIOR 190-183-999-5350
430.26
371.68-
58.58
53266 12/17/98 002229 LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I NOV 98 PRESS CLIPPINGS
001-111-999-5270
332.54
332.54
53267 12/17/98 002664 MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC. FACTORY CAT/PREVENTATIVE MAINT 190-182-999-5250
53267 12/17/98 002664 MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC. FACTORY CAT/PREVENTATIVE MAINT 190-182-999-5250
125.00
61.00
186.00
53268 12/17/98 002666 MASON & MASON REAL ESTA APPRAISAL SERVS:PALMS PLAZA 210-165-604-5700
893.75
893.75
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53269 12/17/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
53270 12/17/98 000843
53271 12/17/98 003241
53272 12/17/98 003163
INC. 5/8" COMBS FOR CAFR BINDING 001-140-999-5222
INC. SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222
INC. CAFR DESIGN & TYPESET COVERS 001-140-999-5222
INC. SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222
INC. CAFR - 150 SETS OF 10 DIVIDERS 001-140-999-5222
INC. SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222
INC. CAFR - 24# LASER BLANK STOCK 001-140-999-5222
INC. SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222
MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO OCT OLD TWN STREETSCAPE DESIGN
MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I INSTALL COMPRESSOR @ CITY HALL
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM MINOLTA SERV & SUPPLY CONTRACT
280-199-824-5804
340-199-701-5610
190-181-999-5220
40.00
3.10
841.00
65.18
987.00
76.49
123.00
9.53
9,325.50
1,300.00
225.00
2,145.30
9,325.50
1,300.00
225.00
53273 12/17/98 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS
MISC PARTS AND SUPPLIES-PW 001-164-601-5218
30.37
30.37
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
53274 12/17/98 002139
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS-OLD TWN
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS-OLD TWN
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS-CIP
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS-TCSD
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS FOR RDA
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS FOR CSD
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS FOR CIP
DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS FOR CSD
1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5254
001-120-999-5254
190-180-999-5254
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5254
001-140-999-5228
114.84
952.56
172.22
258.33
184.57
86.35
172.22
142.47
55.64
2,139.20
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/17/98 12:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53275 12/17/98 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPLY SERVICES 340-199-701-5250
53275 12/17/98 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPLY SERVICES 340-199-702-5250
53275 12/17/98 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPLY SERVICES 340-199-701-5250
53275 12/17/98 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPLY SERVICES 340-199-702-5250
431.96
143.99
27.08
9.02
612.05
53276 12/17/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
25.26
25.26
53277 12/17/98 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER TYPEWRITER REPAIR -POLICE 001-170-999-5229
65.00
65.00
53278 12/17/98 003322 PACIFIC PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AERIAL PHOTO FOR RDA USE
53278 12/17/98 003322 PACIFIC PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AERIAL PHOTO FOR RDA USE
280-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
1,003.00
697.00
1,700.00
53279 12/17/98 002331 PEP BOYS INC
AUTO PARTS & MISC SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218
43.09
43.09
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 001-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS REI 165-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130
53280 1~/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
53280 12/17/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS:TCSD 190-180-999-5254
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS:CIP 001-165-999-5256
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS:RDA COM 001-120-999-5254
322.43
11.13
22,991.91
692.32
3.01
3,782.66
13.28
33.93
412.90
113.58
.90
300.45
130.50
690.59
142.40
491.04
263.61
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
80.08
1.87
14.08
.05
.14
1.54
.61
.92
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
270.00
112.00
104.00
30,557.55
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/17/98 12:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADVERTISEMENTS:RED RIB 001-100-999-5254
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PH317 001-120-999-5256
53282 12/17/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: LEVEL B 001-120-999-5256
35.00
27.26
38.54
586.80
53283 12/17/98 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RESID IMPROV PRGM:SZERCHUCK,L. 165-199-813-5804
575.00
575.00
53284 12/17/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
53284 12/17/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
53284 12/17/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
1,129.88
93.33
868.19
2,091.40
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 340-199-701-5263
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5214
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5263
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5214
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5263
53285 12/17/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214
20.16
17.00
31.21
7.00
14.99
30.00
120.36
53286 12/17/98 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC.
OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING 280-199-999-5362
750.00 750.00
53287 12/17/98 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET NOV 98 PROF LEGAL SERVS
001-130-999-5247 111.00 111.00
53288 12/17/98 000266 RIGHTWAY
RIVERTON PARK TOILET RENTAL 190-180-999-5238
62.89 62.89
53289 12/17/98 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION NOV PRGSS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 PRJT 210-165-601-5804
53289 12/17/98 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION NOV PRGSS:RANCHO CA/I/15 CO 210-165-601-5804
53289 12/17/98 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION W/H:RANCHO/I-15 PRJT 210-2035
136,519.61
45,551.65
18,207.13-
163,864.13
53290 12/17/98 003282 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION- RETENTION TO ESCROW PW95-12 210-1035
18,207.13 18,207.13
53291 12/17/98 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES IMPROV PROG:CHAVIRA, STEVE 165-199-813-5804
53291 12/17/98 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES IMPROV PROG: JONES, J. 165-199-813-5804
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SERVICES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-PARKS 190-180-999-5250
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-SR CTR 190-181-999-5250
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-CRC 190-182-999-5250
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-TCC 190-184-999-5250
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-C.HALL 340-199-701-5250
53292 12/17/98 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CITY MASTER KEY SYSTEM-MAINT 340-199-702-5250
53293 12/17/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING 280-199-999-5362
53294 12/17/98 002384 SECURE BUSINESS COMMUNI AUDIO/VIDEO MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5250
1,680.00
4,999.00 6,679.00
95.75
120.00
50.00
130.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
3,108.63
600.00
595.75
3,108.63
600.00
53295 12/17/98 000645 SMART & FINAL° INC. SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES
190-183-999-5370
62.52
62.52
53296 12/17/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-17-214-0428 MEADOWS PKWY 191-180-999-5319
53296 12/17/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319
53296 12/17/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-17-038-0802 MARGAR[TA 190-180-999-5240
53296 12/17/98 000537 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON 2-10-331-1353 PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240
53296 12/17/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3030 WINCH RD TC1 191-180-999-5319
170.60
1,726.63
73.72
736.09
155.88
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53296
53296
53296
53296
53296
53296
53296
53297
53298
53298
53298
53298
53299
53299
53300
53301
53302
53303
53304
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53305
53306
53307
53308
12:57
CHECK
DATE
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000926
001212
001212
001212
001212
003467
003467
000521
001672
000311
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
000919
002578
001483
002452
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS
SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS
STEWART, BRUCE M,
TARGET OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
TEMECULA VALLEY FLYERS
TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
TEMEKU HILLS REC, LLC
TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
2-09-330-3139 WINCH RD TC-1
2-02-351-5281RANCHO VISTA A
2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS
2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS
2-10-901-7962 YUKON TC1
52-77-796-2616-01MARGARITA RD
66-77-795-0080-01 FRONT ST
ELECT HOOK-UP SIGNAL BX HWY79S
021 725 0775 4 6TH ST
101 525 0950 0 PUJOL ST
133 040 7373 0 CITY MA[NT
095 167 7907 2 PAUBA RD
COMPETITOR PACE CLOCK/CRC
FREIGHT
STREET ADDRESSING SERVICE
1ST PLACE PRIZE:SANTA'S PARADE
PLUMBING SERVICES-SENIOR CTR.
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
PARTICIPATION IN X-MAS PARADE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
SEPT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
OCT VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY PARTY- FOOD
PROF SERV:REGIONAL CENTER PRJT
MAINT MATERIALS FOR GRAFFITI
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
191-180-999-5319
190-182-999-5240
192-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
280-199-999-5362
001-164-602-5405
190-181-999-5240
190-184-999-5240
340-199-702-5240
001-171-999-5240
190-182-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
001-162-999-5250
190-183-999-5370
190-181-999-5212
190-2900
190-183-999-5370
001-163-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-164-604-5263
001-165-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
001-170-999-5262
001-162-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-164-604-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-170-999-5262
001-150-999-5265
001-2620
001-164-601-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
189.71
3,371.56
24,586.54
8,383.76
152.77
89.84
99.37
479.72
127.21
59.37
44.51
182.32
288.91
24.87
175.00
200.00
67.00
100.00
300.00
192.45
576.29
127.28
62.71
576.24
20.06
24.92
143.54
115.62
581.66
166.35
52.54
9.98
155.48
554.26
17.45
3,509.00
702.50
95.8O
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
39,736.47
479.72
413.41
313.78
175.00
200.00
67.00
100.00
300.00
3,376.83
3,509.00
702.50
95.8O
VOUCHRE2
12/17/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53309
53310
53311
53312
53312
53313
53314
53315
53316
53317
53318
53319
53320
12:57
CHECK
DATE
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
12/17/98
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
002396 U S LONG DISTANCE, INC.
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO.
000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO.
003530 ~.A. DOBY ENGINEERING,
003320 WEST COAST PEDDLER, INC
000867 ~ESTIN LONG BEACH
000867 WESTIN LONG BEACH
003505 WILLIAMS, KAY
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
003540 YASINOSKY, BERYL
002186 ZUNA, PAUL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PW ADMIN
LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER
NOV 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES
CITY HALL MODIFICATIONS
CITY HALL MODIFICATIONS
REV[EW:TRAFIC SIGNAL RANCHO CA
ADVERTISING FOR OLD TWN EVENTS
HOTEL:MCDERMOTT:GFOA SEMINAR
HOTEL:PATT]SON:GFOA SEMINAR
RE[MB FOR OLD TWN PROMOTIONS
5765 COLOR COPIER OCT USAGE
YASINOSKY:COMPUTER PURCH PRGM
PLANS EXAMINER EXAMINATION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-604-5220
320-199-999-5208
001-162-999-5248
001-161-999-5250
001-162-999-5250
210-165-601-5801
280-199-999-5362
001-140-999-5258
001-140-999-5258
280-199-999-5362
330-199-999-5239
001-1175
001-162-999-5261
ITEM
AMOUNT
204.94
1,387.99
1,343.58
1,791.00
1,791.00
142.50
248.00
218.00
109.00
129.62
883.40
1,440.62
155.00
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
204.94
1,387.99
1,343.58
3,582.00
142.50
248.00
218.00
109.00
129.62
883.40
1,440.62
155.00
TOTAL CHECKS 744,955.91
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
15:24
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
141,116.51
10,092.58
20,830.23
5,398.29
2.50
4,339.10
25.00
32,619.39
13,806.66
7,141.91
597.60
4,649.45
955.81
TOTAL 241,575.03
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53321
53322
53325
53325
53325
53326
53327
53328
53329
53329
53330
53330
53330
53330
53330
53330
53330
53330
53331
53332
53333
53334
53335
53336
53337
53337
53337
53338
53338
53338
53339
53339
53340
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/21/98
12/22/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
003213 A M S PLANNING RESEARCH
000368 AMAVISCA, LORRI ANN
000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE
000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
000102 AMERICAN FENCE C0. OF C
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
003285
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003405 BEDARD CONCRETE CONSTRU
002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SY
000154 C S M F 0
CAJKA, CELIA
001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
003349 CAROUSEL FARM & CARRIAG
002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
000135
000135
000135
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC.
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC.
003534 CLOUD PRODUCTIONS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BULK MAIL-TRAFFIC NE~SLETTER
RGHT-~Y ACQUISTION-KCY DEVELPT
SOFTBALL A~ARDS
SOFTBALL A~ARDS
SOFTBALL AWARDS
DEVELOP CULTURAL ARTS PLAN
REIMB:HOLIDAY LIGHTS SUPPLIES
POSTAGE SCALE SOFTWARE UPDATE
CONST. FENCE RENTAL - MUSEUM
CONST. FENCE RENTAL - MUSEUM
UNIFORMS FOR TCSD MAINTENANCE
FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.@ SR.CTR.
FLR.MATS/TO~EL RNTL.@ CRC
FLR.MATS/TO~EL RNTL.@ TCC
FLR.MATS/TO~EL RNTL.@ CTY.HALL
FLR.MATS/TOWEL RNTL.@MTNC.FAC.
UNIFORMS FOR PW MAINT CRE~
CREDIT:NOT COVERED ON CONTRACT
RES IMPROV. PRGM:KNAPP
~ORD 97 CONSULTING/TRAINING
CSMFO CF:2-2/7 G. ROBERTS
REFUND:CHILDRENS CRAFT CLASS
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
TROLLEY SERVICES IN OLD TO~N
IN HOUSE MTG REFRESHMENTS
IN HOUSE MTG REFRESHMENTS
BREAKFAST ~ITH SANTA 12/12
STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE
NO PARKING BIKE LANE SIGNS
SALES TAX
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
POST PRODUCTION:~ONDRLND VIDEO
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5230
210-165-631-5700
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5248
190-180-999-5301
330-199-999-5230
210-190-808-5804
210-190-808-5804
190-180-999-5243
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
001-164-601-5243
001-164-601-5243
165-199-813-5804
001-161-999-5261
001-140-999-5258
190-183-4980
001-150-999-5250
280-199-999-5362
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
190-183-999-5370
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
340-199o701-5263
165-199-999-5262
190-180-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,686.20
14,000.00
982.68
988.07
417.18
3,000.00
63.27
161.63
95.00
95,00
42.00
37.06
91.06
51.66
84.60
34.20
66.12
14.48-
3,050.00
600.00
305.00
6.00
42,00
660.00
102.06
115.73
1,290.00
65.7'5
2,187.50
169.53
20.65
15.18
400.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,686.20
14,000.00
2,387.93
3,000.00
63.27
161.63
190.00
392.22
3,050.00
600.00
305.00
6.00
42.00
660.00
1,507.79
2,422.76
35.83
400.00
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53341
53341
53342
53342
53343
53344
53345
53346
53347
53347
53347
53347
53347
53347
53347
53347
53348
53348
53348
53349
53350
53350
53351
53352
53352
53353
53354
53355
53355
53356
53357
53357
53357
53357
53357
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002147
002147
002932
002932
001009
002106
002413
003006
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
003150
003150
003150
002128
002060
002060
001313
000165
000165
002832
000166
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS SANTA FOR HOLIDAY FESTIVITIES
COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS PERFORMERANCES-DICKENS OF XMAS
CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE INSTALL CARPETING FOR MAINT FA
CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE DEPOSIT ON CARPETING FOR MAINT
D B X, INC.
RELEASE RETENTION PW97-24
DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT
DALEY & HEFT
OCT LEGAL SERVICES - CLAIMS
DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING RES IMPROV. PRGM:DEVEREUX
E S
E S
ES
E S
ES
ES
ES
ES
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
TEMP HELP W/E 12/4/98 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/4/98 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 SERVEN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 SERVEN
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 SERVEN
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:MARG PARK
RELEASE STOP NOTICE:MARG PARK
STOP NOTICE:MARG COMM PARK
ENGINEERING VENTURES, I NOV PROF SRVCS-WINCH./I-15
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN REFRESHMENTS MUSEUM PROJECT
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN SALES TAX
FAGAN, MATTHEW
O.T. GUITARIST HOLIDAY PROMOS
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
FENCE BUILDERS
FENCE REPAIRS - VILLAGES
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO TRUSTEES FEES/EXP:BLACK#S PROP
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
340-199-702-5250
340-199-702-5250
210-2035
190-2140
300-199-999-5246
165-199-813-5804
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
190-180-999-5118
193-180-999-5118
001-164-603-5118
210-2038
210-2038
210-2038
210-165-697-5804
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
193-180-999-5212
165-199-812-5804
001937 GALLS, INC. CELLULAR PHONE HOLSTER 001-100-999-5242
001937 GALLS, INC. FREIGHT 001-100-999-5242
003535
GARY HEIMAN PRODUCTIONS OPERATOR FOR WONDRLAND VIDEO
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES:PLANNING
HISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
190-180-999-5250
001-110-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
200.00
300.00
939.00
785.00-
9,848.40
82,50
141.50
1,400.00
580.80
580.80
224.33
224.33
448.66
361.93
723.85
361.92
727.24
100,822.38
100,822,38-
2,373.75
89.10
6.91
150.00
14.75
18.50
1,285.00
2,187.18
12.99
5.99
850.00
45.15
165.89
1,057.01
54.51
141.15
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
500.00
154.00
9,848.40
82.50
141.50
1,400.00
3,506.62
727.24
2,373.75
96.01
150.00
33.25
1,285.00
2,187.18
18.98
850.00
VOJCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53357
53357
53357
53357
53357
53358
53359
53359
53360
53360
53361
53362
53362
53363
53363
53363
53363
53363
53363
53364
53365
53366
53366
53366
53366
53367
53368
53369
53370
53371
53371
53372
53373
53374
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
003550
003550
001609
001609
002174
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
001517
002098
000194
000194
000194
000194
000199
002573
002789
001282
001973
001973
002187
000669
003541
VENDOR
NAME
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GONZALES, ESTELLA
GRAMMA AUDREYS ANTIQUES
GRAMMA AUDREYS ANTIQUES
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS
HADJIS, MARCINA
HADJIS, MARCINA
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HANKS HARDWARE INC.
HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
JONES, SUSAN W.
KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION
KNORR SYSTEMS, INC
LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI
LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR
LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
LIGNTNING CORPORATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
OLD TOWN WREATH PROMOTION
OLD TOWN WREATH PROMOTION
ALARM FOR COMM SVS CABOOSE
SICATE PARK ALARM MONITORING
PHOTOGRAPHY POP TEAM AWARDS
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOM RENTAL
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT/ROOM RENTAL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-MTNC.FAC.
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR & MAINT.
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000199 IRS GARN
REIMB:LEAGUE CF EXPENSE 12/2-4
TEMP HELP W/E 12/6 MUELLER
MISC POOL SUPPLIES
PARKING LOT LIGHTING REPA]R
PARKING LOT LIGHT]NG REPAIRS
NOV ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
MEMBERSHIP DUES 1999
VIDEO DUP:WINTER WONDERLAND
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-182-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-184-999-5220
280-199-999-5220
165-199-999-5220
190-2900
280-199-999-5362
001-2630
001-110-999-5223
190-180-999-5250
001-110-999-5223
190-183-4990
190-2900
190-184-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
001-150-999-5248
001-170-999-5214
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
001-2140
001-120-999-5258
001-140-999-5118
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-172-999-5255
001-100-999-5226
190-180-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
48.20
187.98
9.39
140.87
140.87
100.00
2,901.75
2,730.00
73.00
105.00
87.50
80.00
100.00
18.88
362.53
188.64
209.01
345.32
232.18
386.95
11.01
1,245.44
18.75
100.00
6.25
302.51
23.36
234.00
24.47
119.00
433.50
4,409.00
100.00
161.63
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,991.02
100.00
5,631.75
180.00
87.50
180.00
1,356.56
386.95
11.01
1,370.44
302.51
23.36
234.00
24.47
552.50
4,409.00
100.00
161.63
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53375
53376
53377
53377
53378
53379
53379
53379
53379
53379
53380
53381
53382
53382
53382
53382
53382
53382
53382
53383
53384
53385
53386
53387
15:24
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
003482 MARGARITA GRILL
000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001892 MOBILE MODULAR
N. L. BARNES CONSTRUCTI
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
002100 OBJECT RADIANCE, INC.
003116 OLDE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE
001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CO., I
002652 OSCAR'S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 12/06/98 BELIAN
QUARTERLY MANAGEMENT LUNCHEON
NOV PRGSS:RANCHO CA/I-15 DESGN
NOV PRGSS-OLD TWN STREETSCAPE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
250 CORRECTION NOTICE/B&S
BUSINESS CARDS:MARGIE COHEE
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS-JOYCE POWERS
SALES TAX
OLD TWN CONSTRUCTION TRAILER
OVRPYMNT: FEE LD98074GR
QTY 5500 CASH RECEIPTS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
QTY 2700 BUS LIC APPLICATIONS
TEMPLATE CHARGE FOR CHANGE
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
RECRUITMENT AD:ASSIST FACILITY
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING
MISC. HOLIDAY SUPPLIES FOR TCC
NAKAYAMA SISTER CITY LUNCHEON
53388 12/23/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
000247 PESTMASTER
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
53389
12/23/98
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
R-O-W WEED CTRL -CITY WIDE
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-16Z-999-5118
001-150-999-5260
210-165-601-5801
280-199-824-5804
190-183-999-5330
001-162-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
280-199-999-5222
280-199-999-5222
280-199-999-5362
001-2670
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-150-999-5254
190-183-999-5330
280-199-999-5362
190-184-999-5301
001-101-999-5280
001-2122
001-164-601-5402
001-111-999-5269
320-199-999-5220
001-150-999-5265
190-183-999-5370
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5370
190-180-999-5301
001-150-999-5265
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
417.96
323.75
107.94
81.20
256.00
43.01
38.25
2.96
102.50
7.94
420.23
920.00
770.88
30.54
59.74
1,192.29
15.00
20.29
93.56
13.82
489.44
715.00
90.95
320.74
73.84
24,857.00
22.96
18.31
4.08
37.98
17.03
45.44
23.13
8.61
2.69
12.99
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
417.96
323.75
189.14
256.00
194.66
420.23
920.00
2,182.30
13.82
489.44
715.00
90.95
320.74
73.84
24,857.00
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53390
53392
53392
53392
53392
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53393
53394
53394
53394
53394
53395
53396
53397
53398
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000253
000253
000253
000253
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
000254
002110
002110
002110
002110
000255
000635
003546
VENDOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CQMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRO LOCK & KEY
PROMENADE-PCH, L.P.
R & J PARTY PALACE
RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIHBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
DISPLAY ADS:OLD TOWN PROMOTION
DISPLAY ADS:CIP UPDATES
DISPLAY ADS:OLD TWN PROMOTIONS
DISPLAY ADS:ELECT LGHT PARADE
PUBLIC NOTICE: LEVEL B
PUBLIC NOTICE: PH318
PUBLIC NOTICE: PH 319
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0219
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0431
PUBLIC NOT]CE: PW97-07
PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-06
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-VARIOUS PARKS
RENTAL OF GENERATOR FOR PARADE
DANAGE WAIVER
SALES TAX
LOCKS CHANGED ON CITY PROPERTY
OVRPMT:PLAN CK FEESLD98-O29MP
RENTAL EQUIP FOR MALL EVENT
HOTEL:VOLLMUTH:CAPPO 1/19-1/22
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5265
001-150-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
190-2920
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5263
001-140-999-5261
001-150-999-5265
001-162-999-5242
001-164-601-5214
001-164-602-5222
001-170-999-5220
001-171-999-5261
190-180-999-5301
190-181-999-5301
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5370
190-184-999-5301
001-1990
280-1990
001-165-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
280-199-999-5362
001-165-999-5256
280-199-999-5362
190-180-999-5254
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
165-199-812-5804
001-2670
001-111-999-5270
001-140-999-5261
ITEM
AMOUNT
10,67
27.95
17.54
13.99
5.50
17.66
10.50
60.91
21.54
46.16
14.65
30,71
15.00
75.72
57.04
14.94
54.42
2.37
31.00
17.47
10.75
66,55
25.75
17.25
109.20
112.00
1,657.50
156.00
39.01
15.25
15.50
22.00
18.75
40.00
38.75
252.19
100.00
10.00
7.75
59.0O
4,801.51
3,762.82
327.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
738.96
120.30
2,223.96
369.94
59.00
4,801.51
3,762.82
327.00
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53399
53399
53399
53399
53399
53399
53399
53399
53399
53400
53400
53400
53400
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53401
53402
53403
53404
53405
53406
53407
53407
53407
53407
53407
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000262
000262
000262
000262
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
000418
003001
002226
003548
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
VENDOR
NAME
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
RICHARDS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
WATSON & GERS
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R
ROSS FENCE COMPANY
RUSSO, MARY ANNE
SANTA CLARA HOUSING BUR
SKY CANYON ENTERPRISES,
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND M[SC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND N[SC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND NISC SUPPLIES
01-17-80000-1 VIA EDUARDO
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 98 LEGAL SERVICES
REL:PUBLIC FACILITY FEE AGRMNT
RESID IMPROV PRGM: DEVEREUX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
CPRS HOUSING RESERV DEPOSIT
DEC-JAN HANGER RENTAL:ARTIFACT
2-13-079-2377 HWY 79
2-02-351-6800 VARIOUS METERS
2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS
66-77-795-0080-01 FRONT ST
66-77-795-0302-01 FRONT ST PED
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-165-601-5804
210-165-673-5802
280-199-824-5804
001-164-604-5268
210-165-696-5804
210-165-604-5804
210-165-683-5804
210-165-696-5804
210-165-604-5804
001-164-601-5250
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-1280
001-130-999-5246
210-165-631-5801
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
001-1280
001-1280
300-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
210-165-631-5801
280-199-999-5246
001-100-999-5250
165-199-813-5804
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5258
190-185-999-5250
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
001-164-603-5319
001-164-603-5319
ITEM
AMOUNT
71.33
78.52
235.47
53.88
258.21
1,623.66
685.37
846.05
1,112.70
32.61
479.34
20.86
2,297.07
7,543.49
591.25
5,527.50
1,429.50
91.00
3,623.65
29.00
162.50
527.50
221.00
2w242.25
62.56
4,542.03
791.50
1,205.50
70.24
397.50
54.00
852.46
20.00
2,780.00
525.00
500.00
1,120.50
159.11
55.07
5,163.25
100.34
21.84
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,965.19
2,829.88
29,964.43
20.00
2,780.00
525.00
500.00
1,120.50
5,499.61
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
15:24
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53408
53409
53410
53411
53412
53412
53412
53412
53412
53413
53414
53415
53415
53416
53416
53417
53418
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000926
001212
001696
001672
000168
000168
000168
000168
000168
000308
000308
000307
000307
000876
000876
002578
003539
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLY
TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI
TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON
TEMEKU HILLS REC, LLC
TOP GUN PAINTING
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNDERGROUND SERV:RANCHO CA/I15
091 024 9300 5 RANCHO VISTA
MISC SUPPLIES FOR SISTER CITY
PLUMBING SVCS. - VARIOUS PARKS
FLOWERS:PIANIST PERFORMANCE
COMMUNITY SVS PRESENTATION
SUNSHINE FUND
FLOWERS PER COUNCIL DISCRETION
COMMUNITY SERV PRESENTATION
SPONDORSHIP:FRONTIER RODEO
SPONSORSHIP:ROD RUN
PLAQUES: HOLIDAY LIGHTS
SALES TAX
SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
REPAYMENT OF PRIOR YEAR LOAN
RENTAL BAL FOR HOLIDAY PARTY
FACADE IMPROV PRGM:RANCON BLDG
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065" DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
53419 12/23/98 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA} 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
53420
53420
53420
53420
53420
53420
53420
UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS
UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS
53421
53421
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
003051
003051
TEMP A.C.FOR CITYWIDE POTHOLES
TEMP A.C.FOR CITYWIDE POTHOLES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-165-604-5804
190-182-999-5240
001-101-999-5280
190-180-999-5212
280-199-999-5362
190-180-999-5250
001-2170
001-101-999-5285
190-180-999-5250
001-111-999-5266
001-1520
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
001-111-999-5266
001-1510
001-150-999-5265
280-199-813-5804
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
479.72
1,714.38
33.35
47.00
75.96
50.64
108.72
136.30
44.12
10,000.00
10,000.00
95.56
7.41
35,000.00
5,000.00-
513.00
5,000.00
6,752.50
272.73
1,282.70
2.50
33.18
25.00
106.06
83.33
620.35
158.34
758.34
168.37
769.42
52.05
41.06-
76.52
83.20
339.69
530.93
CHECK
AMOUNT
479.72
1,714.38
33.35
47.00
415.74
10,000.00
10,000.00
102.97
30,000.00
513.00
5,000.00
9,336.69
1,866.84
870.62
53422 12/23/98 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 127.50
VOUCHRE2
12/23/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53422
53422
53423
53424
53424
53425
15:24
CHECK
DATE
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
12/23/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000325
000325
003114
000345
000345
000348
VENDOR
NAME
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
WASKA, CAROLYN
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ZIGLER, GAIL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000325 UW
000325 UW
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING
XEROX COPIERS MAINT & SUPPLIES
XEROX COPIERS MAINT & SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCH PRGM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
165-2120
190-2120
190-183-999-5330
330-199-999-5217
190-184-999-5239
001-1175
ITEM
AMOUNT
.50
27.00
67.20
4,411.30
122.84
1,997.69
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
155.00
67.20
4,534.14
1,997.69
TOTAL CHECKS 241,575.03
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
15:57
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND T'ITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
603,570.91
3,121.29
18,635.80
492.98
71.87
877.46
227.45
57.63
23,051.00
4,900.94
304.35
7,792.85
2,510.51
4,284.22
TOTAL 669,899.26
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
3049
981230
53437
53438
15:57
CHECK
DATE
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/9~
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/48
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000166
001538
000110
VENDOR
NAME
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA
AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
PURCHASE PROP. 42049 MAIN ST
PROF SERVICES DEV. ITMS
POSTAGE METER/SCALE MAINT AGR.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-1700
210-165-640-5802
330-199-999-5217
ITEM
AMOUNT
17,395.79
425.39
3,710.83
8.79
22.30
297.13
73.52
149.21
42.06
621.44
194.49
572.66
4,316.59
129.83
1,019.25
2.44
6.22
76.58
20.77
54.59
24.38
117.16
62.48
139.04
34.79
2.81
51.31
.66
2.74-
5.10
5.55
4,517.06
145.60
806.73
1.53
3.66
57.50
10.54
56.85
13.93
152.38
39.68
116.08
530,600.00
4,735.00
775.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
29,482.94
6,019.02
530,600.00
4,735.00
775.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/30/98 15:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53439 12/30/98 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY POSTAGE METER RENTAL 330-199-999-5239
53439 12/30/98 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY POSTAGE METER RESETS 330-199-999-5239
53439 12/30/98 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY SALES TAX 330-199-999-5239
177.00
25.50
15.69
218.19
53440 12/30/98 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY INSURANCE:CORTE CRISTINA 300-199-999-5204
93.00
93.00
53441 12/30/98 001260 C P R S MEMBERSHIP:T.HOLMES '99 190-180-999-5226
53441 12/30/98 001260 C P R S CPRS CF:2/18-21TCSD MGMT STFF 190-180-999-5258
53441 12/30/98 001260 C P R S CPRS CF:2/18-21TCSD MGMT STFF 00~-1170
53442 12/30/98 001260 C P R S MEMBERSHIP DUES '99:P. RUSE 190-180-999-5226
110.00
1,280.00
59.00
110.00
1,449.00
110.00
53443 12/30/98 003549 CALIFORNIA ASSN. OF MUS MEMBERSHIP DUES '99 H. PARKER 190-185-999-5226
100.00
100.00
53444 12/30/98 002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE
TEM/MURRIETA CIRC. ELEMENT MTG 001-161-999-5260
109.92
109.92
53445 12/30/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
53445 12/30/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5242
53445 12/30/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5242
53445 12/30/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5242
53445 12/30/96 001193 COMP USA, INC. FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242
53445 12/30/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242
53446 12/30/98 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS COSTUME RENTAL:BRKFST W/SANTA 190-183-999-5370
139.92
205.00
550.00
270.00
20.00
79.45
61.42
1,264.37
61.42
53447 12/30/98 003559 CORPORATION FOR ENTERPR PUB:RETHINKING URBAN ECON.DEV. 001-110-999-5228
23.90
23.90
53448 12/30/98 003556 DE LUNA, WILLIAM EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES:P.D. 001-170-999-5242
53.76
53.76
53449 12/30/98 DE VALCK, WILLIAM REFUND:TCSD SRVC LEVEL R 195-180-4005
57.63
57.63
53450 12/30/98 003561 DFH ASSOCIATES
53451 12/30/98 000609 DOUBLETREE HOTEL
PUB:'99 CA ELECT[ON CODE BOOK
HTL:CSMFO CF 2/27-3/2 G.ROBRTS
001-120-999-5228
00~-140-999-5258
53452 12/30/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/9 MCLEAN 280-199-999-5118
53452 12/30/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 10/9 MCLEAN 280-199-999-5118
53452 12/30/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/6 MC LEAN 280-199-999-5118
53452 12/30/98 001380 E S [ EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 MC LEAN 280-199-999-5118
53452 12/30/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/20 HILLBRG 165-199-999-5118
53453 12/30/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER LIGHT TOWERS FOR PARADE 190-180-999-5238
53453 12/30/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER LIGHT TOWERS FOR PARADE 190-180-999-5238
53453 12/30/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER LIGHT TOWERS FOR PARADE 190-180-999-5238
53453 12/30/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER SALES TAX 190-180-999-5238
53453 12/30/~8 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER LIGHT TOWERS FOR PARADE 190-180-999-5238
53453 12/30/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER RENTAL OF LIGHT STANDARDS 280-199-999-5362
53454 12/30/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2592-2107-0902 J.O. NOV 001-110-999-5220
53454 12/30/98 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2592-2107-0902 J.O. NOV 280-199-999-5362
41.04
567.60
473.60
363.04
889.76
889.76
1,722.15
2,092.50
209.25
500.00
178.39
596.84
55.00
64.65
177.14
41.04
567.60
4,338.31
3,631.98
241.79
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/30/98 15:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53455 12/30/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-171-999-5228
296.61
296.61
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-197-5072 DEC GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-0783 DEC GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-6243 DEC PALA COMM PRK 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4354 DEC PALA COMM PRK 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-3564 DEC CITY ALARM 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-7945 DEC CRC F.ALARM 320-199-999-5208
53456 12/30/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-8632 DEC GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
53457 12/30/98 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214
4,379.84
49.91
28.10
30.24
54.45
54.05
28.76
140.00
4,625.35
140.00
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5220
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5242
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SALES TAX 001-170-999-5242
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5229
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5220
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SALES TAX 001-171-999-5220
53458 12/30/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MESC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
11.78
89.50
6.94
112.37
93.71
5.66
84.33
404.29
53459 12/30/98 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, INSTALL PANIC BUTTON:SKATE PRK 190-180-999-5250
150.00
150.00
53460 12/30/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES -FIRE 001-171-999-5212
101.26
101.26
53461 12/30/98 003557 I C B 0
1999 ICBO MEMBERSHIP:A.ELMO 001-162-999-5226
25.00
25.00
53462 12/30/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN OCT TEMP HELP CLARK & OLSEN 001-162-~g9-5118
53462 12/30/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN OCT TEMP HELP CLARK & OLSEN 001-162-999-5118
53462 12/30/98 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN NOV TEMP HELP CLARK & OLSEN 001-162-999-5118
53463 12/30/98 003558 LITTLE PROFESSOR'S BOOK PUBLICATIONS 190-185-999-5228
1,764.70
8,036.30
7,964.62
90.40
17,765.62
90.40
53464 12/30/98 002890 LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TE DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-170-999-5208
115.60
115.60
53465 12/30/98 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
369.60
369.60
53466 12/30/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM DEC LEASE OF CRC COPIER 190-182-999-5239
53467 12/30/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263
53467 12/30/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 340-199-701-5263
53467 12/30/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
162.70
59.92
27.67
96.37
162.70
183.96
53468 12/30/98 003458 NELSON PAVING & SEALING CITY HALL PARKING LOT REPAIR 340-199-701-5212
53469 12/30/98 NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. DOMAIN REGISTR:11/4/98-11/4/O0 320-199-999-5211
53470 12/30/98 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL BASKETBALL SCHEDULE FEES 190-183-999-5380
53471 12/30/98 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 280-1990
53471 12/30/98 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 320-199-999-5208
53471 12/30/98 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 320-199-999-5208
2,930.00
70.00
536.00
103.27
127.16
8.14
2,930.00
70.00
536.00
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53471
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53472
53474
53475
15:57
CHECK
DATE
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/9~
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
1~/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
003021
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000253
000254
VENDOR
NAME
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
POSTMASTER
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
DEC CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
CREDIT ON CELL PHONE INVOICE
000246 MLT PERS
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
BULK MAILING OF TCSD BROCHURE
RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
001-140-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
00!-110-999-5208
001-163-999-5208
001-164-601-5208
001-164-604-5208
001-165-999-5208
001-1990
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
191-2130
192-2130
193-2130
194-2130
00t-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
190-180-999-5230
001-150-999-5254
ITEM
AMOUNT
117.57
80.26
71.11
511.80
210.87
80.04
452.34
177.17
194.70
113.13
148.74
137.97
82.10-
322.43
22,377.05
693.64
3,748.58
13.28
33.93
405.40
113.58
301.77
130.52
723.40
142.40
491.04
263.61
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
TJ.01
1.87
14.10
.05
.14
1.52
.61
.92
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
2,285,56
179.10
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,452.17
29,914.47
2,285.56
179.10
53476 12/30/98 001592 RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI SEPT CODE ENFORCE EMERG RADIO 001-170-999-5238 705.04
53476 12/30/98 001592 RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI OCT CODE ENFORCE EMERG RADIO 001-170-999-5238 705.04 1,410.08
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53477
53477
53478
53479
53479
53480
53481
53481
53482
53483
53484
53484
53484
15:57
CHECK
DATE
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/9~
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
12/30/98
VENDOR
NUMBER
002181
002181
000537
000537
002578
002111
002111
003366
002899
000345
000345
000345
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
SMITH, MELVIN J.
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
TEMEKU HILLS REC, LLC
TOGO'S
TOGO'S
TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON
UNISTRUT
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PRG PMT #30:WINCHESTER/I-15
RETENTION W/H PMT~F30:WINCH/I15
RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:M.SMITH
55-77-223-6409-01:PAUBA TCl
65-77-804-6630-01:RNBO CYN TC1
NAKAYAMA SISTER CITY VISIT
REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG:11/03
REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG:11/24
MAINT FACILITY MODIFICATIONS
MISC HARDWARE FOR SIGNS
JUL-SEP BASE CHRG:2510 COPIER
DEC LEASE OF 5765 COPIER
COPIER SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-602-5804
280-2035
280-199-813-5804
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
001-101-999-5280
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
210-190-158-5804
001-164-601-5218
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5217
ITEM
AMOUNT
916.30
45.82-
514.89
350.22
113.86
195.00
140.47
88.29
18,316.00
56.17
117.00
373.39
581.85
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
870.48
514.89
464.08
195.00
228.76
18,316.00
56.17
1,072.24
TOTAL CHECKS 669,899.26
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
16:21
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
340 FACILITIES
471 CFD 98-1ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
AMOUNT
837,348.65
42,532.00
3,130.00
23,493.00
227,359.66
6,000.00
23,806.21
541.00
5,500.00
TOTAL 1,169,710.52
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
12/30/98 16:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION · NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53487 01/12/99 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT SPECIAL TAX CONSULTANT 261-199-999-5250 6,000.00
53487 01/12/99 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT SPECIAL TAX CONSULTANT 471-199-999-5250 5,500.00
53487 01/12/99 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT OCT PROF SRVCS-R.CAL/I-15 210-165-601-5801 24,877.31
36,377.31
53488 01/12/99 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. ANNUAL SUPPORT EDEN SYSTEM 320-199-999-5211 6,624.75
6,624.75
53489 01/12/99 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC PRG PMT:MARGARITA COMM. PARK 210-190-119-5804 43,824.50
53489 01/12/99 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC C/O 4 & 5 PMT:MARG.COMM.PARK 210-190-119-5804 11,557.08
53489 01/12/99 003150 EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC RETENTION W/H PMT:MARG.COMM.PK 210-2035 5,538.15-
49,843.43
53490 01/12/99 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION PLAN CHECK SRVCS- BLDG&SAFETY 001-162-999-5248 5,458.87
5,458.87
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE - PARKS 190-180-999-5415 8,961.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 8,813.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 13,375.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 1,150.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-SPORTS PK 190-180-999-5415 18,578.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-S.CENTER 190-181-999-5415 361.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-CRC 190-182-999-5415 1,444.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MA[NTENANCE-TCC 190-184-999-5415 193.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-C.HALL 340-199-701-5415 541.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-O.T.PRKG 001-164-603-5415 250.00
53491 01/12/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE-F.ST #84 001-171-999-5212 400.00
54,066.00
53492 01/12/99 002416 GENESIS CONSTRUCTION PRG PMT#2:MARG. RD STORM DRAIN 210-165-681-5804 5,565.20
53492 01/12/99 002416 GENESIS CONSTRUCTION RETENTION W/H PMT#2:MARG. RD 210-2035 556.52-
5,008.68
53493 01/12/99 001550 GROSSMONT BANK RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT:EDGE 210-1035 5,538.15
5,538.15
53494 01/12/99 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT CONVENTION/CONFERENCE FACILITY 001-111-999-5248 7,186.09
7,186.09
53495 01/12/99 000210 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES - MEMEBERSHIP DUES 1999 001-100-999-5226 6,767.00
53496 01/12/99 003453 OPTIMAL INTEGRATED SOLU REMOTE ACCESS SERVER 320-1970 7,610.00
53496 01/12/99 003453 OPTIMAL INTEGRATED SOLU INSTALLATION & CONFIGURATION 320-1970 825.00
53496 01/12/49 003453 OPTIMAL INTEGRATED SOLU SALES TAX 320-1970 589.78
6,767.00
9,024.78
53497 01/12/99 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI MAINT YARD INSPECTORS FURNITUR 210-190-158-5804 11,071.78
11,071.78
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-161-999-5250 6,225.00
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-161-999-5250 8,145.00
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA PLAN CHECK AND INPECTION SERVS 190-180-999-5248 959.68
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA PLAN CHECK AND INPECTION SERVS 191-180-999-5248 802.72
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVS 190-180-999-5248 2,235.32
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVS 191-180-999-5248 1,177.28
53498 01/12/99 003218 PELA PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVS 193-180-999-5248 1,305.00
53499 01/12/99 003521 PRO GREENS, INC. SINGLE DRILL/FILL AERIFICATION 19Q-180-999-5415 9,800.00
53500 01/12/99 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S BOOKING FEES - OCTOBER 1998 001-170-999-5273 8,611.20
53500 01/12/99 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23,1998 001-170-999-5288 203,071.68
20,850.00
9,800.00
VOUCHRE2
12/30/98
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53500
53501
53501
53501
53501
53501
53502
53502
53502
53502
53503
16:21
CHECK
DATE
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01,12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
003484
003484
003484
003484
003484
003149
003149
003149
003149
000332
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
SIERRA DIGITAL, INC
SIERRA DIGITAL, INC
SIERRA DIGITAL, INC
SIERRA DIGITAL, INC
SIERRA DIGITAL, INC
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23
.1998
.1998
.1998
.1998
.1998
.1998
1998
1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23,1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT-SEPT 23,1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
LAW ENFORCEMENT - OCTOBER 1998
RECWARE ACTIVITY REGISTRATION
RECWARE FACILITY RESERVATION
RECWARE LEAGUE SCHEDULING
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT & UPDATES
SALES TAX
NOV PRGSS-TEM DUCK POND II
NOV PRGSS-WlNCH CRK PRK
RETENTION W/H DUCK POND II
RETENTION W/H WINCH CRK PARK
OCT 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5289
001-170-999-5291
001-1230
001-170-999-5281
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5279
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
00~-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5289
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5281
001-1230
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5279
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
210-190-143-5804
210-190-149-5804
210-2035
210-2035
001-162-999-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
38,814.40
37,900.80
9,721.60
24,412.80
9,293.28
9,293.28
29,649.17
2,807.94
21,945.97
5,653.78
198,520.56
38,681.48
38,502.40
9,721.60
24,412.80
11,7'38.88
26,943.57
5,217.28
2,825.60
18,666.51
4,668.93
2,095.00
2,095.00
1,995.00
1,385.00
586.68
138,318.12
7,260.00
13,831.81-
726.00-
21,841.18
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
781,075.51
8,156.68
131,020.31
21,841.18
TOTAL CHECKS 1,169,710.52
ITEM 4
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
January 12, 1999
City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1998
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director~'%''
Jesse Diaz, Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receives and files the City Treasurer's Report as of
November 30, 1998.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government
Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of November 30, 1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
1. City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1998
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of November 30,
1998
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of November 30, 1998
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of November 2t0, 1998
Cash Activity for the Month of November
Cash and Investments as of November 1, 1998
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of November 30, 1998
54,897,471
2,433,612
(2,922,848)
54,408,235
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/ Contractual/
Termination Market
Type of Investment Institution Yield Date Value
Petty Cash City Hall n/a $ 1,500 $
General Checking Union Bank n/a 787,077
Sweep Account' Union Bank 4.060 % 387,000
(Money Market Account) (Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank n/a 9,279
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.492 % 38, 159, 053
Certificate of Deposit Community Bank 5.300 % 351,103
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account G-rossmont Bank 4.950 % 121,933
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account Union Bank 4.880 % 132,086
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account Union Bank n/a 5,481
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.406 % 3,076,395
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Accotmt- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.420 % 9/1/2017 500,000
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.406 % 1,041,795
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts - Measure A U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.406 % 638,546
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.406 % 17,585
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 502,690
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.406 % 5,696,323
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Accoun~-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920
(Investment Agreement)
$
Par/Book
Balance
1,500
787,077 (1)
387,000
9,279 (1)
38,159,053 (2)
351,103
121,933
132,086
5,481
3,076,395
1,531,469
500,000
1,041,795
638,546
17,585
502,690
5,696,323
1,448,920
54,408,235
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At November 30, 1998 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $32,353,201,900.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $38,665,920.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temeeula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temeeula for the next six months.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of November 30, 1998
city (1)
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 36,028,522
Receivables 4,251,396
Due from other funds 748,756
Land held for resale
Prepaid assets 47,337
Deposits 523,523
Fixed assets-net 903,002
Total assets $ 42,502,536
Community
Services
District
1,215,349
454,529
27,012
$ 1,696,890
Redevelopment
Agency
10,805,894
1,130,936
1,457,505
2,220,245
$ 15,614,580
Facilities
Districts (2)
$ 6,358,470
1,124,300
$ 7,482,770
To~l
54,408,235
5,836,861
2,233,273
2,220,245
47,337
1,647,823
903,002
67,296,776
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 577,647
Other liabilities 6,863,062
27,013
123,840
$ 1,457,505 $ 171,108
1,499,359 3,164,051
2,233,273
11,650,312
Total liabilities 7,440,709 150,853 2,956,864 3,335,159 13,883,585
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,281,781
Retained eamings 771,376
Fund balances:
Reszrved (3) 7,365,885
Designated (3) 22,022,417
Undesignated 3,620,368
Totalfund equity 35,061,827
1,076,964
587,825
(118,752)
1,546,037
1,696,890
$ 42,502,536 $
8,359,329
4,298,387
12,657,716
$ 15,614,580
1,124,300
3,069,320
(46,009)
4,147,611
$ 7,482,770
Total liabilities and fund equity
1,281,781
771,376
17,926,478
29,977,949
3,455,607
53,413,191
67,296,776
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and other special revenue funds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills).
(3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages.
ITEM 5
CITY
DIR.
CITY
APPROVAL
ATTORNEY
OF FINANCE
MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
Mike Brown, Fire Chief
January 12, 1999
Amendment to Fire Protection Agreement for Fiscal Year 1998-99
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Coundl approve the amended Fire Protection Agreement
for Fiscal Year 1998-99 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement, final form to
be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the 1998-99 operating budget the City Council authorized
three (3) Fire Safety Spedalists and one (1) Fire System Inspector. An amendment to the fire protection
contract is being requested to provide additional fire prevention staffing. There are two positions being
requested in response to the demand for service resulting from the current and expected trend in new
development. Initially these positions will help the current staff in meeting an acceptable level for
turnaround time for plan review and field inspection. Due to the mall project there will be a significant
amount of workload generated for fire prevention staff. These positions will help to offset this increased
workload. Of the two positions being requested the Fire Safety Specialist position will be hired
immediately. The Fire System Inspector position is being requested for approval to fill within a couple
of months when a hiring list is established. Once the new construction workload decreases the focus
of these additional positions will be to develop and implement a fire permit program.
Due to the diverse growth occurring within the City, staff has identified the need to develop our fire
permit and annual inspection program. The fire permit program provides a vital tool for ensuring
facilities maintain a reasonable degree of fire and life safety after the initial certificate of occupancy has
been issued. Fire permits constitute permission to maintain, store, use or handle materials, or to
conduct processes which produce conditions hazardous to life or property, or to install equipment used
in connection with such activities. Currently, permits are issued as part of the new development
process. Once the building is built and occupied the permit should be reissued annually. This requires
an inspection of all occupandes where permits are required to ensure the conditions of the permit(s) are
in compliance. The permit program is a component of an annual inspection program.
Unfortunately, the new construction demand placed upon the current fire prevention staff has left little
time to develop and implement this needed permit program or stay abreast of the critical facilities
needing to be inspected annually. The Fire Safety Specialist position being hired immediately will
coordinate the program as one of their primary duties. The Fire Safety Inspector position will be
responsible for conducting the annual field inspections and issuing permits.
FISCAL IMPACT: The additional cost assodated with these positions for the remaining fiscal year
is $60,263. Adequate funds are budgeted for fiscal year 1998-99 Fire Services as stated in the attached.
R.'WORTONL~.GENDAS~9899FIRECONTAGN, DOC 1/7/99
Attachment: Riverside County Fire Services Contract for 1998-99
R:WOR TONL ~4GENDASLo899FIRECONTAGN. DOC '~ 2/14/98
THIRD AMENDMENT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION,
RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into by the CITY OF TEMECULA and
the County of Riverside,
RECITALS
WHEREAS, The parties heretofore entered 'into an agreement entitled "A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION,
RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA" (the "AGREEMENT") dated
September 23, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the parties are requesting an amendment to said agreement attachment
Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this amendment is to update the rates.
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein
contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. AMENDMENT. The parties agree that Exhibit "A" of the agreement is hereby
amended to provide as follows:
The attached Exhibit "A" shall be in place for the Fiscal Year 1998/99.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Third Amendment shall become effective upon execution
by all of the above-mentioned parties.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the City has caused this agreement to be signed and sealed
and the County of Riverside by order of its Board of Supervisors, made ,
has caused this agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and sealed and
attested by the Clerk of the Board, all on the day and year first above written.
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST: BY:
By: TITLE:
TITLE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTEST:
BY:
CLERK OF THE BOARD
12/21/98
TEMECULA STAFFING LEVEL
FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 - 3 PERSON ENGINE CO.
4 PERSON TRUCK CO.
SERVICE
DELIVERY 1 - CAPT.
COST 1.6 - ENG.
5.2
FF II
STA, #12
STA. #73
STA. #84
EXHIBIT "A"
TOTAL
226,997 216,076 351,112 794,185
236,963 216,076 351,112 804,151
228,136 216,076 351,112 795,324
STA #83-50% City @ 10 mo~
1 - CAPT.
2.0 - ENG.
6.0
FF II
98,735 103,130 168,804
SUBTOTAL
370,669
$2,764,329
TRUCK COMPANY (50%)
1 - BATTALION CHIEF
1 - FIRE MARSHALL (B/C)
4 - FIRE SAFETY SPEC.
2 - FIRE SYSTEMS INSP.
3 - CAPT. 3 - ENG.
135,496 117,886
6 - FF II's
202,565
(1 FSS @ 6 mo.'
(1 FSP @ 6 mos.)
64,181 lEA
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
455,947
110,082
110,082
224,634
84,519
$985,263
TOTAL DOLLARS FOR STAFFING
TEMECULA TAX CREDIT
NET CITY BILLING
TAX CREDIT: FIRE TAXES
REDEV. TAXEE
TOTAL
SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS:
SUPPORT SERVICES
Administration
Fire Prevenljon
Automotive
Dispatch
Training
Data Processing
Haz. Materials Team
Communications
Accounting
Personnel
Public Affairs
Procurement
Volunteer Support
Emergency Services
1,466,630
163,011
1,629,641
OPERATING SERVICES
Telephone
Radio Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
Utilities
Vehicle Maintenance
Fire Engine
Fire Engine Maint.
Fire Fighting Equip.
Training
First Aid Supplies
Office Supplies/Equip.
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Fire Engines
$3,749,591
(1,629,641)
2,119,950
ITEM 6
APPROVAL ~~
DIR. CE
CITY MANAGER ,..,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: January 12, 1999
SUBJECT: Purchase of Two (2) City Vehicles
Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of two (2) 1999 Dodge regular size vehicles
from Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge in the amount of $39,874.48 (both).
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the 1998/99 annual Operating Budget approved the
funding for the purchase of two (2) trucks to be used by Building & Safety and, Fire. The inspector
staff will use both of the new trucks.
On November 24, 1998, the City mailed six (6) Requests for Proposal ("RPF's") to local vendors
for the purchase of the three (3) trucks (see attached vendor list). Of the six (6) RPF's that the staff
sent out only one proposal was received as listed below within the acceptable timeframe and it was
for only two (2) of the three (3) vehicles identified in the RFP. The third truck was not bid on by
Norm Reeves, Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge. Late bids were received by the City Clerk from Paradise
Chevrolet and Toyota of Temecula. The staff was in communication with all the dealerships to
ensure a complete understanding of the RFP and bid process. Based on previously purchased
vehicles the below bid is considered competitive and is recommended by staff. The purchase of
these two (2) trucks from Norm Reeves will satisfy the vehicular requirements for Building & Safety.
Dealer Vehicle/model Price
Norm Reeves Regular size, extended cab $19,721.74
Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Building &Safety
Total Purchase Price
Regular size, extended cab
Fire (red body, white top)
$20,152.74
$39,874.48
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for vehicle
depreciation expense for this fiscal year.
Vehicle Vendor List
Carriage Motors
41872 Motor Car Pkwy
Temecula Ca 92591
Toyota of Temecula
26631 Ynez Road
Temecula Ca 92591
Norm Reeves
26755 Ynez Road
Temecula Ca 92591
Paradise Chevrolet
26845 Ynez Road
Temecula Ca 92591
Rancho Ford
26895 Ynez Road
Temecula Ca 92591
Nissan of Temecula
41895 Motor Car Pkwy
Temecula Ca 92591
ITEM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
January 12, 1998
Records Destruction Approval
PREPARED BY: Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance
with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which
authorizes the destruction of certain City records which have become outdated, obsolete or are
excess documents, in compliance with State of California Government Code, Sections 34090
through 34090.7.
Attached Exhibit A, lists records from the Public Works Department, Copies of 1994 & 1995 Traffic
Collision Reports. These records have been identified within Group XIII of the retention schedule
and the data from these reports are currently in a computerized data management system.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed the Exhibit, as provided for in
Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
Destruction of Records Request, Public Works Department
Exhibit A, List of Records recommended for destruction
r:\flores\destroy.ar
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator
January 12, 1998
Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a listing of records maintained in the Public Works Department that are
eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention
Policy.
The attached list of records has been identified within Retention Group XIII, as outlined
in Exhibit AI", Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my
consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the
City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
R: \forms\destruct. rqs
ITEM 8
APPROVAL~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER , ,'
[.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21067. (Northwesterly of intersection
of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road)
PREPARED BY:r~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
ACCEPT the Public Improvements, including subdivision monumentation, in Tract No.
21067.
AUTHORIZE reduction in the Faithful Performance Securities to the ten-percent (10%)
warranty amount, release of the Subdivision Monumentation security, and initiation of the
one-year warranty period.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On September 18, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
21067, and entered into Subdivision Agreement with:
Kingsway Construction Corporation
2650 Camino Del Rio North
San Diego, CA 92108
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the Subdivision Agreement were surety bonds issued
by Insurance Company of the West as follows:
Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $1,571,500 ($1,255,500, $149,500, and $166,500,
respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, water and sewer
improvements.
Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $785,750 ($628,000, $75,000, and $82,750,
respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, water and sewer
improvements.
3. Bond No. 117 85 66 in the amount of $31,284 to cover subdivision monumentation.
R:~agdrptL99~0112~tr21067accept
1
Kingsway Construction Corporation's successor-in-interest of this site is:
Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc., General Partner)
One Columbia
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
who have executed replacement agreements and securities for the contractual work.
Replacement surety bonds were posted by the same surety, Insurance Company of the West, under
the same bond numbers and in the same amounts as the odginal documents.
On December 19, 1995, the City Council authorized a fifty-percent (50%) reduction in Faithful
Performance. The remaining Faithful Performance Bond amount was sufficient to both complete the
remaining work and provide the contractual ten-percent (10%) warranty amount, as follows:
Street, Water and Sewer Improvements Bond No. 117 85 65
$785,750
Public Works Staff has reviewed the public improvements required for this tract and finds the work
satisfactory. The Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their
facilities. Therefore Staff recommends the acceptance of the public improvements, initiation of the
one-year warranty period, release of the subdivision monument bond, and reduction of the Faithful
Performance security to the following ten-percent (10%) warranty amount:
Street, Water, and sewer improvements warranty Bond No. 117 85 65
$157,150
Staff has reviewed and approved the subdivision monumentation for this tract. Therefore it is
recommended that the Subdivision Monumentation security be released as follows:
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 117 85 66 in the amount of
$31,284.
The developer posts Labor and Materials security to assure payment to suppliers of labor and
materials. This security is retained until the contractual six-month lien period following City Council
acceptance of the public improvements has run, at which time Staff recommends release or
reduction in the security depending on the amount of any unsatisfied claims for labor or materials
posted against the development.
The affected streets are not being recommended for acceptance into the City-Maintained Street
System at this time as there are several issues dealing with rights-of-way to be resolved. The
streets within the subdivision are Trotsdale Drive, Canterfield Ddve, and portions of Temecula Lane
and Murfield Drive.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
R:~egd~ptL99~011L~tr21067accept
VICINITY MAP
fro JEALF
15. ~5 ~ ZW
f
¢
TRACT NO. 21067
Loca :i o n
MaD
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
Accept Substitute Agreement and Security for Erosion Control in Tentative
Tracts 23143-2, 3, and 4. (Southeasterly of intersection of Pauba Road at
Butterfield Stage Road)
PREPARED BY: rC/Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Security for Erosion
Control in Tentative Tracts No. 23143-2, 3, and 4.
AUTHORIZE the release of the Erosion Control Security posted by Crowne Meadows,
L.L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developers and Sureties.
BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1992, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
23143-1 and entered into subdivision improvement agreements with:
Taylor Wood row Homes
For the improvement of streets, drainage, and sewer and water systems,
subdivision monumentation, and payment of traffic signalization mitigation fees.
posted by the American Insurance Company in the following amounts:
installation of
Bonds were
Bond No. 111 4143 9437 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $1,409,000
($1,024,000, $193,000, and $191,500 respectively), for street, drainage, and water and
sewer improvements.
Bond No. 111 4143 9437 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $704,000 ($512,000,
$96,750, and $95,750 respectively), for street, drainage, and water and sewer
improvements.
3. Bond No. 111 4143 9429 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $38,148.
4. Bond No. 111 4143 9445 for Traffic Signal Mitigation in the amount of $12, 150.
R:\agdrpt\99\0112\TR231 43erosionsub
1
At a later date the subdivider also posted security assuring erosion control measures for the
overall grading site identified as "Tracts No. 23143-2, 3, and 4" as follows:
Bond No. 111 4157 5156 for Erosion Control in the amount of $141,000.
The subdivider, Taylor Wood row Homes, had earlier initiated work on sixteen other tracts in the
City of Temecula which were impacted by the prolonged housing slump. The first recorded unit
under Tentative Tract 23143 was also impacted by the housing slump as well as a portion of the
Assessment District No. 159 work which would traverse through the site. This "Crowne Hill
Drive" and related grading was ultimately not performed under Assessment District No. 159
auspices.
The purchaser of the overall site, Crowne Meadows, LLP, a Washington Limited Partnership,
submitted substitute agreements and securities posted by American Motorists Insurance
Company which were accepted by the City Council on September 8, 1998, as follows:
1. Bond No. 3SM 914 511 00 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $1,409,000.
2. Bond No. 3SM 914 511 00 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $704,500.
3. Bond No. 3SM 914 509 00 for Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $38,148.
4. Bond No. 3SM 914 505 00 for Traffic Signal Mitigation in the amount of $12,150.
Bond No. 3SM 914 510 00 for Erosion Control in the amount of $141,000 for Tentative
Tracts No. 23143-2, 3, and 4.
Crown Meadows, LLP, a Washington Limited Partnership, has now sold all but the recorded
unit, Tract No. 23143-1, to Richmond American Homes of California, Inc. The new purchaser
was conditioned in the sale to replace the Erosion Control security for these remaining units-
identified as "Tracts No. 23143-2, 3, and 4". Staff recommends acceptance of the substitute
Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the following security as posted by the American
Home Assurance Company:
Bond No. 21-24-81 for Erosion Control Faithful Performance in the amount of $141,000.
Staff also recommends release of the following security to the American Motorists Insurance
Company on behalf of Crowne Hill, L.L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership:
Bond No. 3SM 914 510 00 for Erosion Control for Tracts No. 23143-2, 3, and 4 in the
amount of $141,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Security. (on File)
R:\agdrpt\99\0112\TR23143erosionsub
2
~~~4~n' ~OJEC?
VICINITY MAP
SAME DWNERBHIP
PARCEL MAP 22429
PM 147/!4-19
PCL 4
r-TRACT NO. 23143-4
TRACT N0.
23143-3
PCL 3
PCL 6
Tentative Tracts No. 23 143-2,
Location
Map
tRACT NO.
3,&:4.
23143-2
NOTE; MAPS NOT TO SCALE.
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Authorize access to Rycrest Drive from Lot 4 in
(Northeasterly of Margarita Road at Solana Way)
Tract No. 22208.
PREPARED BY: I~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
AUTHORIZE driveway access to Lot 4 in Tract No. 22208 from Rycrest Drive by permitting
an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors approval of the final Tract Map.
AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the issuance of
an encroachment permit setting forth conditions of approval including slope protection and
landscape and irrigation relocation/restoration to the satisfaction of TCSD Staff.
BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Map No.
22208 on February 23, 1988, and accepted offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes
over several streets including the westerly half of Rycrest Drive. The acceptances included
dedication of access rights to the public for lots abutting Rycrest Drive while providing access to
these residential parcels from the interior streets within the subject tract.
Lot 4 was provided access from Marwood Circle within the tract boundaries. The restriction of
access to Lot 4 from Rycrest Drive did not take into account that much of the useful area of this lot
was not accessible to the planned access from Marwood Circle. The residential portion of the lot
was graded by the developer so that the remaining portion was at a different elevation which did not
afford direct access to the rear portion of Lot 4.
The owner-applicant, Paul Gonzales, notes that he has taken access to the subject area from
property to the northwest of his site. That property is now being subdivided as Tract No. 28553-2
and is being graded for residential building sites inclusive of certain grading onto the rear of the
subject Lot 4. The Rycrest Drive frontage has certain landscaping/irrigation improvements which are
maintained by the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD).
Public Works staff has reviewed this issue with TCSD and will establish conditions of any
encroachment permit issuance so that driveway approach installation, landscaping replacement as
required, installation of fencing and gating, relocation and protection of TCSD irrigation facilities as
required, and any indemnification as set forth by the City Attorney will apply. The costs for this work
and permit will be incumbent on the owner-applicant.
r:\agdrpt\99\0112Vycrestaccess
This exception to the access rights limitation rests with the inaccessibility to the major portion of Lot
4. The other lots within Tract 22208 which abut Rycrest Drive, and which access rights to Rycrest
Drive were likewise granted to the public, have no such limitation on the physical use of their parcels.
The easterly side of Rycrest Drive, recorded on Tract Map No. 21561, placed no such limitations on
access but none of these owners have taken side or rear yard access to Rycrest Drive to this date.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACH M E NTS:
Location Map
Letters of request from applicant/owner and abutting developer.
r:\agdrp~99\0112Vycrestaccess
~#RMaA
. VICINITY MAP
LOT
ZO
I 'ql
I , ~
Lot 4 in Tract No. 22208
Location Ma-)
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
December 3, 1998
Temecula City Council
Attn: A1 Crisp
43200 Business Park drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Access from Ryecrest Drive
41820 Marwood Circle
Dear Mr. Crisp and Members of the Council:
On November 3, 19~[7, I attended a City Council meeting and expressed my concern for
access to the rear of my yard. I had worked with the previous owner of the adjoining
property to have access through their property. That property is now owned by another
builder and is being developed with a plan that will no longer provide access to maintain
my lot.
This letter is to request that I be allowed to put a gate to access my lot from Rycrest
Drive. I have enclosed a copy of the map showing the approximate location of the gates.
The gates would be located approximately 150' from the nearest intersection. I would
like to have two 8' gates to allo~v a full-siZe vehicle to enter the lot.
Please contact me if you have any questions or if you need. I can be reached at my
office, 676~1101.
Paul J. Gonzalez
Eric.
![
o
: /
w
> .¢
\
\ ~
,- /
Pacific Century Homes
December 3, 1998
Temecula City Council
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: Mr. Paul Gonzalez, 41820 Marwood Circle
Dear Members of the City Council:
We are the developers of the property adjoining Mr. Gonzalez's lot. It is our
understanding that in the past, Mr. Gonzalez was able to access the rear of his lot through
Tract 28553.
With the development of the Promenade Tract, he no longer is able to access his lot
through this project. Mr. Gonzalez has been extremely willing to work with us by giving
us permission to grade on his lot to satisfy our grading plan requirements.
Mr. Gonzalez will be asking the City Council for access through Ryecrest Drive. Your
consideration of his request is appreciated.
Yours truly,
PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES
Neil D. Gascon
President
amn J. Gardner
Project Manager
jjg
40925 County Center Drive, Suite 110, Temecula, CA 92591 · 909.506-1606 · FAX 909.506-1612
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Accept Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3(A).
(Northwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows
Parkway)
PREPARED BY~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECO M M ENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT Public Improvements for the interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3(A).
AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent (10%)
warranty amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 23371-3 on July 24, 1990.
Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
as follows:
Margarita Village Development Company
c/o The Buie Corporation
Bonds were posted by the Allied Mutual Insurance Company as follows:
Faithful Performance Bond No. 7900 532288 in the amounts of $2,067,000 for
street and drainage improvements, $420,000 for water system improvements, and
$482,000 for sewer system improvements.
Labor and Materials Bond No. 7900 532288 in the amounts of $1,033,500 for street
and drainage improvements, $210,000 for water system improvements, and
$241,000 for sewer system improvements.
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 7900 532287 in the amount of $65,800 to cover
subdivision monumentation.
On May 12, 1992, the City Coundl approved a standard City Subdivision Improvement Agreement
which replaced the County format agreements and extended the contract completion date to March
27, 1993.
1 R:~AGDRPTLqg~0112~TR233713aACC
On December 19, 1995, the City Council authorized the Director of Public Works and City Attorney
to have released certain surety bonds relating to a change in ownership in the Margadta Village
project resolved through Bankruptcy Court proceedings. Included in this release were several bonds
in Tract 23371-3.
Subsequent to City Council authorization for release, the development was sold to:
McMillin Project Services, Inc.
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 91950
The new developer submitted a proposal to divide Tract 23371-3 into three development phases and
submitted replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreements and securities for the three separate
phases ("3A", "3B", and "3C"). Phase 3C has been resubdivided as Tract No. 28526 and approved
by the City Council on December 15, 1998.
On December 10, 1996, the City Council approved the replacement Subdivision Improvement
Agreement, and accepted the following securities as posted by the Insurance Company of the
West:
Faithful Performance Bond No. 149 23 54 in the amount of $1,864,000 for street,
drainage, water, and sewer improvements for interior streets.
o
Labor and Materials Bond No. 149 23 54 in the amount of $932,000 for street,
drainage. Water, and sewer improvements for interior streets.
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 149 23 55 in the amount of $4,963 for subdivision
monumentation.
Eastem Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. Public
Works Staff has inspected and verified the interior street public improvements. Therefore Staff
recommends acceptance of the interior public street, drainage, water, and sewer improvements,
initiation of the one-year warranty period, and reduction in Faithful Performance security to the ten-
percent (10%) warranty amount as follows:
Bond No. 149 23 54 in the amount of $186,400 for street, drainage, water, and sewer
improvements for Faithful Performance Warranty.
The Labor and Materials security will be maintained for the contractual six-month lien period which
follows City Council acceptance of the improvements.
The subdivision monumentation is being reviewed by Staff and when satisfactory will be
recommended for acceptance by the City Council and for release of the subdivision monumentation
security.
The affected interior public streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by
Resolution at a later time. The intedor streets within this portion of the subdivision are Mashie Way,
Fore Way, Balata Drive, Honors Drive, and portion of Brassie Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
2 R:~AGDRPTLqg~0112~TR233713aACC
:/
TEMECULA
~ I IqlOJECT t ""
R/NCHO ~
'
TE. EcuLA
VICINITY MAP
Tract No. 23371-3(A)
Location Ma-~
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Accept Public Improvements for intedor streets in Tract No. 23371-3(B)
(Northwesterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California
Road)
PREPARED BY:///2/Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT Public Improvements for interior streets in Tract No. 23371-3 (B).
2. AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance secudty amounts to the ten-percent (10%)
warranty amount, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the Tract No. 23371-3 on July 24, 1990.
Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were posted with Clerk of the Board of Supervisors by:
Margarita Village Development Company
C/o The Buie Corporation
Bonds were posted by the Allied Mutual Insurance Company as follows:
1. Faithful Performance Bond No. 7900 532288 in the amounts of $2,067,000 for
street and drainage improvements, $420,000 for water improvements, and
$482,000 for sewer improvements.
2. Labor and Materials Bond No. 7900 532288 in the amounts of $1,033,750 for street
and drainage improvements, $210,000 for water improvements, and $241,000 for
sewer improvements.
3. Subdivision Monument Bond No. 7900 532287 in the amount of $65,800 for
subdivision monumentation.
On May 12, 1992, the City Council approved a standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement which
replaced the County format agreements on file and extended the contract completion date to March
27, 1993.
1 R:~AGDRPTLqg~0112~TR233713bACC
On December 19, 1995, the City Council authorized the Director of Public Works and City Attorney
to have released certain surety bonds relating to a change in ownership in the Margarita Village
project resolved through Bankruptcy Court proceedings. Included in this release were the several
bonds posted in Tract 23371-3.
Subsequent to City Council authorization for bond release, the development was sold to:
McMillin Project Services, Inc.
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 91950
The new developer submitted a proposal to divide Tract 22371-3 into three development phases and
submitted replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreements and securities for the three separate
phases. Phase 3C has been resubdivided as Tract No. 28526 and approved by the City Council on
December 15, 1998.
On December 10, 1996, the City Council approved the replacement Subdivision Improvement
Agreement for Phase 3 (B) , and accepted the following replacement securities as posted by the
Insurance Company of the West:
Faithful Performance Bond No. 149 23 56 in the amount of $1,265,000 for street,
drainage, water, and sewer improvements for the interior streets.
Labor and Materials Bond No. 149 23 56 in the amount of $632,500 for street,
drainage, water, and sewer improvements for the interior streets.
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 149 23 55 in the amount of $2,484 for subdivision
monumentation.
Eastem Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. Public
Works Staff has inspected and verified the interior street public improvements. Therefore Staff
recommends acceptance of the public street, drainage, water, and sewer improvements for the
interior streets in Phase 3(B), initiation of the one-year warranty period, and reduction in Faithful
Performance security to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amounts as follows:
Bond No. 149 23 56 in the amount of $126,500 for public street, drainage, water, and
sewer improvements for interior streets for Faithful Performance Warranty purposes.
The Labor and Materials securities will be maintained for the contractual six-month lien pedod which
follows City Council acceptance of the public improvements.
The subdivision monumentation is being reviewed by Staff, and when satisfactory, will be
recommended for acceptance by the City Council and for release of the subdivision monumentation
security.
The affected interior public streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by
Resolution at a later time. The streets within this portion of the subdivision are Iron Court, Bunker
Drive, Rough Way, and portions of Driver Lane, Vardon Drive, and Brassie Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
None.
Location Map
2 R:~AGDRPTLqg~0112~TR233713bACC
/
~U~O~ ~O.
VICINITY MAP
Tract No. 23371-3(B)
Location MaD
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 13
APPROVAI~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Release Traffic Signalization Mitigation and Labor and Materials Securities
in Parcel Map 27714 (Located east of Ynez Road, between Solana Way and
Rancho California Road)
PREPARED BY~/)a Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation and Labor and Materials
securities in Parcel Map No. 27714.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On December 19, 1995, the City Council approved Parcel Map No.
27714 and entered into subdivision improvement agreement with:
Rancon Realty Fund IV (c/o Glenborough Corporation)
400 South El Camino Real, Suite 1100
San Mateo, CA 94402-1708
for the improvement of portions of Ynez Road, and pdvate street, and water and sewer systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreement were surety bonds posted
by Explorer Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. 137 38 63 in the total amount of $474,000 ($337,500, $92,500, and
$44,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage,
and water and sewer improvements.
o
Bond No. 137 38 63 in the total amount of $237,000 ($169,000, $46,000, and
$22,000, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, and
water and sewer improvements.
3. Bond No. 137 38 64 in the amount of $3,500 to cover subdivision monumentation.
r:%agdrptLq8\l 117~prn27714.fin
On June 24, 1997, the City Council accepted the public street and drainage improvements, recognized
completion of the private streets, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, accepted the
subdivision monumentation, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized reduction in the
Faithful Performance security amount to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amount accepted the
subdivision monumentation. The Faithful Performance security amount was reduced to the following
warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, and Water/Sewer Improvements -Bond No. 137 38 63
$47,400
On November 18, 1997, the City Council accepted a rider to the original faithful performance security
reducing the bond to the appropriate warranty amount ($47,400).
The developer is required to post Labor and Materials bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and
workers. This bond is maintained for six-months after the City Coundl accepts the public improvements
and acknowledges completion of the private improvements. The lien pedod having passed without any
claims for labor or materials posted, Staff recommends the release of the following labor and materials
security:
Streets/Drainage, and Water/Sewer Improvements- Bond No. 137 38 63
$237,000
The developer also posted security for Traffic Signalization Mitigation as follows:
Traffic Signalization Mitigation
Bond No. 137 38 65
$33,575
The adoption of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee structure (Ordinance No. 97-09)
effectively converted the traffic signalization mitigation fee structure from per gross acre to per square
footage of building area. There were a number of Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreements and
securities outstanding as of the adoption date. Most of the commerdal and industrial developments fell
immediately under the new fee structure and will be paying in cash at the time of the building permit the
required Traffic Signal Mitigation fee. There have been few requests for release of the outstanding
securities. The subject requested secudty release is one of several currently under preparation for such
City Council action.
Therefore, Staff recommends the release of the following security:
Traffic Signalization Mitigation
Bond No. 137 38 65
$33,575
Staff and the developer are scheduling a "walkthrough" to assure that any necessary repairs or
replacements of public improvements have been satisfactorily completed. Staff will recommend release
of the Faithful Performance warranty security when appropriate to the City Council.
The affected street within the parcel map boundary is Ynez Road. This street was pad of the County
Maintained-Road System pdor to City incorporation on December 1, 1989, and became a part of the City
Maintained-Street System by succession to the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
None
Location Map
r:\agdrpt\98\1117~prn27714.fin
Parcel Map No. 77714
l~ocation Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 14
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: ~ January 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
Authorization to Pre-Order the Traffic Signal Poles for Winchester Road/Ynez
Road, Project PW97-06 and Margadta Road/Overland Drive, Project PW97-07.
PREPARED BY: ~ William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Coundl authorize staff to pre-order the traffic signal
poles for Winchester Road/Ynez Road, Project PW97-06 and Margarita Road/Overland Drive, Project
PW97-07 from McCain Traffic Supply for an amount of $83,397.25.
BACKGROUND: The City, Forest City Development California, Inc., and LGA-7 Inc., an
Illinois Corporation entered into a Development Agreement on December 17, 1996 by which the City
agreed to design and construct certain traffic signals and street improvements in connection with the
Promenade Mall. The traffic signal poles will take approximately fourteen (14) weeks to manufacture
and deliver. Normally, we would have the successful low bidder order the poles and include the costs
in their bid. Due to the limited time available to complete the street improvements, we are
recommending that the City order the traffic signal poles prior to awarding the construction contract to
meet Forest City Development's schedule.
Staff requested four (4) cost proposals and received two (2) bids as follows:
1. McCain Traffic Supply .................................... $83,397.25
2. GE Supply ............................................ $84,476.00
There are seven (7) intersections that will require new or modified traffic signal poles. The following
costs for each intersection includes a discount price for providing the required poles:
McCain
Traffic Supply
1. Ynez Rd. @ South Plaza $16,131.31
2. Ynez Rd. @ Palm Plaza $ 2,895.89
3. Winchester Rd. @ Street A $16,189.65
4. Winchester Rd. @ Margarita Meadows $ 6,393.67
5. Margarita Rd. @ General Kearny Rd. $15,609.27
6. Margarita Rd. @ Overland Dr. $11,853.59
7. Ynez Rd. @ Overland Dr. $17,798.76
Total: $86,872.14
GE Supply
$16,943.69
$ 3,911.33
$18,732.34
$ 7,413.20
$18,263.63
$13,420.26
$19,578.18
$98,262.63
Total Discount cost:
$83,397.25
$84,476.00
r:\agdrp~98\O728'tpw97-O7,bidlajp
Staff recommends that the City order the poles from McCain Traffic Supply for a total amount
$83,397.25, resulting a cost savings of over $3,400 and to help expedite the street improvement
projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded through
Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Street Improvements, Public Services,
and Public Facilities. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-165-696-5804 and No.
210-165-681-5804.
r:~agdrpt\98\0728~pw97-07.bid/ajp
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FtNANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
(~,~.7,/'2oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jan
uary 12, 1999
Winchester Road at I-15 Off-Ramp Widening, Project No. PW97-03
PREPARED BY: ;~ William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1, for
irrigation relocation, in the amount of $32,690.76.
BACKGROUND: On September 22, 1998 the City Council awarded a construction
contract to Riverside Construction to widen the south bound off-ramp at Winchester Road.
The City Council has approved Winchester Road/I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening for this years
Capital Improvement Program. This is the first of two (2) phases in widening the southbound off-
ramp. Phase I will widen the southbound off-ramp from Winchester Road to the Santa Gertrudes
Creek. This project has been phased so that lengthy bridge structural reviews and Caltrans
processing do not delay partial traffic relief at an early date. Phase I will create a new exclusive left-
turn lane and modify the existing 'left and through" lane to also allow a right-turn movement. To
accommodate this widening, the southbound entrance loop ramp will be moved to the east. This
project will also modify the striping along Winchester Road. The new striping will provide one (1)
additional eastbound right-turn lane onto the northbound entrance loop ramp and an additional
eastbound right-turn lane onto Ynez Road.
During the grading for the widening of the southbound off-ramp and the relocation of the southbound
loop ramp the contractor found an irrigation main that was in conflict with both ramps. The
contractor will relocate 314 meters of three inch (3") irrigation main, 4,872 meters of irrigation wire,
436 meters of lateral lines, extend irrigation crossovers, relocate existing valves and heads, install
five (5) pull boxes, and provide all necessary removals for the relocation of the existing irrigation
system for both southbound ramps.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project. Adequate funds are
available in Capital Reserves and Redevelopment Agency funds Account No. 210-165-697-5804.
ATTACHMENTS: Contract Change Order No. 1
R:\AGDRPT\99\0112\PW97-03CCO 1 .DOClajp
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CONTRACT NO. PW97-03
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Dm/e · Ternecula, CA 92590 · Mailing Address: P Q. Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 92589-9033
(909) 694Jo444 · Fax (909) 694-1999
PR CT: Winchester @ I-15 Off-Ramp Widening SHEET 1 of 1
TO CONTRACTOR: Riverside Construction
NOTE: This change order is not effective until aDDroved by the Engineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
A. An INCREASE in the following items:
Relocate existing irrigation main apparatus: Relocate 314 meters of 3"
irrigation main, 4,872 meters of irrigation wire, 436 meters of lateral
lines, extend irrigation crossovers, relocate existing valves and heads,
install 5 pull boxes, and provide all necessary removals for the
relocation of the existing irrigation system for both southbound ramps
for a total amount of .....................................................................$32,690.76
TOTAL .............................................................................................$32,690.76
Original Contract Amount ....................................................................................$234,000.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ..................................................................................$234,000.00
Change Order No. 1 ( + ) ........................................................................................$32,690.76
Total Contract Amount .......................................................................................,~266,690.76
Estimated Working Days
Approved: Senior Engr.
lo
By://Jj~ Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved,
that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
(company's name)
By: ~ sina Tre ~ ~
Name: ~ ,(<~gjc~'3~ ~"' ~'~
(prin) ~
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding
with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified,
Prlnledon Recy'ded Paper
r:\cip\projects\pw97-21 \cco\ccol .001
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
'~/./'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
Amendment No. 1 to Professional Service Agreement with CHJ, Inc. for
the Old Town Streetscape Project, Project No. PW97-05
PREPARED BY:/k/)'j~William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to a
Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and CHJ Inc. to provide
additional Professional Inspection Services for the Old Town Streetscape Project, Project No.
PW97-05 in an amount not to exceed 918,284.50 and authorize the Mayor to sign
Amendment No. 1
BACKGROUND: On June 11, the City Council awarded a construction contract to
Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. to construct the Old Town Streetscape Project. On June 23,
1998, The City Council awarded a contract to CHJ Inc. to provide professional soil inspection
services for the Old Town Streetscape Improvements in the amount of ~30,000.00. CHJ's
original proposal was negotiated down to cover only minimal soil inspections.
CHJ Inc. was not able to keep their costs below the approved budget due to poor soil
conditions requiring removing and re-compacting of wet sub-grade material, and numerous
hours of weekend and over time hours. CHJ was also required to test and prepare a report
for suspected hazardous material encountered during construction.
The amount of the additional inspection costs is 918,284.50. The Final soil inspection cost
is ~ 48,284.50.
FISCAL IMPACT: This is an RDA Capital Improvement Project and is funded with
existing RDA bond proceeds. Adequate funds are in Account No. 280-199-824-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment No. 1
CHJ letters
R:~3gdrpt\99\0112~CHJ.01T.AMD
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND
C H J INCORPORATED
OLD TOWN STREETSCAPE
PROJECT NO. PW97-O5
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 12, 1999 by and between
the City of Temecula. a municipal corporation ("City") and CHJ Incorporated. ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
On June 23, 1998 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement").
b. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this First
Amendment.
Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed
eighteen thousand two hundred ei~ht'v four Dollars and fifty Cents ($ 18,284.50).
Exhibit "A" is added to the Agreement, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as
though set forth in full.
Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
CHJ Incorporated
P.O. Box 231
Colton, CA 92324
(909) 824-7210
By: Robert E. Johnson,, P.E., Sr. Vice President
R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-05\CHJincamendl/ajp
· INCORPORATED
P.O. Box 231 · 1355 E. Cooley Dr., Colton, CA 92324 · Phone (909) 824-7210 · Fax (909) 824-7209
December 22, 1998
City of Temecula
Department of Public Works
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Mr. William Hughes
Job No. 98453-1
S ubj ect:
Billings for Old Town Streetscape Project
Project No. PW97-05
Dear Mr. Hughes:
In accordance with our telephone conversation of December 21, 1998, I am forwarding information
relative to the charges billed for the Old Town Streetscape Project.
Our firm received an Authorization and Purchase Order from the City of Temecula, dated June 3,
!998. The Purchase Order was for the amount of $30,000.00. To date, essentially through
completion of the project, our billing has been a total of $48,284.50.
At about the time our billings were reaching the $30,000.00 figure, we notified Richard Kinnsch,
the Chief Inspector for the project. It is our understanding that Richard in turn notified the City
through Scott Hildebrandt of Albert A. Webb Associates.
All time on this project was authorized by the Chief Inspector, and signed time tickets were obtained
for this project on a daily basis. The basic reason for the increased charges was the necessity to
deal with certain soils at the site which existed in an over optimum moisture condition. This
SOILS ENGINEERING · GEOLOGY · ENVIRONMENTAL '" MATERIALS TESTING & EVALUATION · CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
Page No. 2
Job No. 98453-1
necessitated extra time on the pan of the contractor to bring these soils to the proper compaction,
and also required additional days, including weekends, for our technician. The over wet soils,
coupled with the accelerated construction schedule, caused operations to be going on in several
different locations at the same time. This also necessitated our technician spending extra time.
Be assured that all of the work performed by our technician was in coordination for the Chief
Inspector for the project. We were only on the project when required and then with consent and
authority of personnel in charge.
I trust this information is sufficient. Should additional information be necessary, please do not
hesitate to contact us at your convenience.
Sincerely,
C.H.J., INCORPORATED
Robert J. Job ason, G.E.
Senior Vice ?resident
RJJ:tlw
ITEM 17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVALF~
CITY A'I'FORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER ,
City Manager/City Council
.~.~,Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Completion and Acceptance of the Cosmic Drive and Agena Street Sidewalk
Improvement Project No. 6 (Project No. PW97-02)
PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the construction of the Cosmic Drive and
Agena Street Sidewalk Improvement Project (Project No. PW97-02), as complete and direct the City
Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On March 17, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract for the
construction of the Cosmic Drive and Agena Street Sidewalk Project (Project No. PW97-02), to
Contreras Construction Company for $92,610.00. The project provided for new sidewalks on the west
side of Cosmic Drive between Rancho Califomia Road and Agena Street and on the north side of Agena
Street between Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecelia Drive. The sidewalks will provide safe access to the
nearby elementary school and provide the opportunity for pedestrians to walk safely outside the
vehicular traveled way.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about
thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $92,610.00. Contract Change
Orders No. I and No. 2 were approved by the City Manager and the City Council in the amount of
$6,494.00. The Cosmic Drive and Agena Street Sidewalk Project was funded by SB821 funds and
Developer Impact Fees.
Attachment:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
r:~agdrpt~99\0112~pw97-02.acc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92589-9033.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to: Mod Craft, Inc. to perform the
following work of improvement:
PW97-02, Cosmic Drive and Agena Street Sidewalk Project No. 06
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services of the City of Temecula and that said work
was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January
12, 1999. That upon said contract the Frontier Pacific Insurance Company was surety for the bond
given by said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 97-02.
6. The street address of said property is: Cosmic Drive between Rancho California Road
and Agena Street and Agena Street between Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 12th day of January, 1999.
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
l, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said
NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder of Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 12th day of January, 1999.
SUSAN W. JONES, CMC, City Clerk
Bond Number SD00033153
Premium: $347.00
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
NIOJEC T NO. PW97-02
CO$1iflC DelVE AND A43$NA STREET
$IDEWAZX IMPIffi VEMENT PROJECT IVO. 6
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THEE PRESENTS THAT:
Contreras Construction Co,PO Box 1808, Indio, CA. 92202
NAME ~D ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
Partnership
(fill/It wheiera Cclv3ooratioa, ,°affAdV~ or im~ividual)
, hereinafter called Principal, and
Frontier Pacific Insurance ComDany,4250 Executive Sq~.~200,La Jolla,CA.92037
NAME AIVO AODRE$$ 01: SURETY
heroinafter caged SURETY, are hid and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
herainafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of NineTh.ousandNineHundredF, leV.~n
- - DOLLARS N~d 00. CENTS
($ 9,911.00 I in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not leg Than
ten percent (10%) Of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of
the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves. successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION Is much that whereas, the Principal antered Into a certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the 17th day of March ,19 98, a copy of which is
hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO, PW97-02 COSMIC
DRIVe, AND AGENA STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 6,
WHEREAS, said Contract provldea that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1} year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER,
against all defeots in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on .T~n,,~Ty, j.2 ..... , 19 ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship In the execution of Mid work, and the carrying out of the terms of said
Contract, or it shall appear that defective materills were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain in full force and virtue. otherwise this instrument Shall be void.
Signed end sealed thil 14th day of December ,19 98
(Seal)
Frontier Pacific Insurance
SURETY
By: ~,
Blake A Pfister
Attorney-in-fact
APPROVED A4; TO FORM:
Peter M. Th0~aon, City Attorney
Company
Contreras Construction Co
PRINC~AL -
E~rigu~.,Contreras
Partner
Ruben Contreras
(Name)
Partner
(~tj~)
Bond # SD00033153
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Orange
On 12-14-98 before me, Lianne Nahina Pfister, Notary
Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public")
personally appeared Blake' A. Pfister
Name(s) of S,gner(s)
Public,
personally known to me - OR - F1 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Maintenance
December 14,
Document Date:
Bond SD00033153
1998
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Blake A. Pfister Signer's Name:
~ Individual [] Individual
j, Corporate Officer [] Corporate Officer
Title(s): Title(s):
[] Partner -- [] Limited 5 General [] Partner -- [] Limited [] General
~ Attorney-in-Fact [] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee [] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator [] Guardian or Conservator
[] Other: Top of thumb here ['3' Other:
Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Signer Is Representing:
Frontier Pacific
Insurance Company ~
995 National Notary Assocmtion · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827
INSURANCE COMPANY
(a California Company)
4250 Executive Square, Suite 200, La Jolla, California 92037
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Attached to SD00033Z53
~,not~ 7A['[' c~cn ~1 ~'ticsc c~lrcscnts: That FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, having its principal office
in La Jolla, California, pursuant to the following resolution, adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on the 15th day of November, 1991.
"RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President be, and hereby is, authorized to appointAttorneys-in-
Fact to represent and act for and on behalf of the Company to execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity
and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and to attach thereto the corporate seat of the Company, in the transaction of its surety
business;
"RESOLVED, that the signatures and attestations of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney
or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile
seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company when so affixed with respect to any bond, undertaking, recognizance or other contract of
indemnity or writing obligatory in the nature thereof;
"RESOLVED, that any such Attorney-in-Fact delivering a secretarial certification that the foregoing resolutions still be in effect may insert in
such certification the date thereof, said date to be not later than the date of delivery thereof by such Attorney-in-Fact."
This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed in facsimile under and by the authority of the above Resolution.
DOES HEREBY MAKE, CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT: BLAKE A. PFISTER
of Irvine , in the State of California
its true and lawful Attorney(st-in-Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead to sign, execute, acknowledge and alelive;
in its behalf, and as its act and deed, without power of redelegation, as follows:
Bonds guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding places of public or private trust, guaranteeing the performance of contracts other than
insurance policies; and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in all actions or proceedings or by law allowed;
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND ($650,000.00) DOLLARS; and to bind FRONTIER PACIFIC INSUR-
ANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bond or undertaking was signed by the duly authorized officers of
FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, and all the acts of said Attorney(st-in-Fact pursuant to the authority herein given are hereby
ratified and confirmed.
;~tt L~D[tn. CSS q~[:)J~Cr¢OF, FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY of La Jolla, California, has caused this Power of Attorney to be signed by its
Vice President and its Corporate seal to be affixed this 23rd day of July ,19 98
FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
:_.--
BY:
DAVID E. CAMPBELL, Vice President
On u 3 before me, N. Ortiz, personally appeared David E. Campbell, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory ev oJe~n~e2t ble9~Re person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his
o'
authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal
~ .Dit~O'~ j Signa;ure of Notary Public
I, the undersigned. Joseph P. Loughlin, Secretary of FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER
OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto subscribed my name as Joseph P. Loughlin, Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the
Corporation this ].
FM 19-5002B-FP (11/98)
dayof December ,1998
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW97-02
COSMIC DRIVE AND AGENA STREET
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 6
This is to certify that Cb~r~c_~t~ (~Y~'~JC~/I~Y)~-. , (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for
all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO.
PW97-02 COSMIC DRIVE AND AGENA STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 6,
situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
PROJECT NO. PW97-02
COSMIC DRIVE AND AGENA STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 6
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated:/~-'/~~) By:
CONTRACTOR
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 R:\CI~PROJECTS\PV,/97%PW97-O2~BID-DOCS
ITEM 18
APPROVAL
CITY A'I'FORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Parcel Map No. 28657-1, Located at the Northwest corner of Diaz Road and
Remington Avenue
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 28657-1 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Letters of Credit as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: On April 1, 1998, the Planning Commission Approved Tentative
Parcel Map 28657-1, expiration date being April 1, 2000. The Developer has met all of the
Conditions of Approval for recordation of the final map.
Parcel Map No. 28657-1 is a six (6) parcel industrial subdivision of 62.53 net acres. The site is
currently vacant.
The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28657-1:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of building permit.
Area Drainage Plan Fee due prior to issuance of building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Parcel Map No. 28657-1
%~TEMEC_FS201%DATA',DEPTS~PV~AGDRPT~99~0112~PM28657-1 .MAP. DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 28657-1
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of building permit.
To be paid prior to issuance of building
permit.
2 \\TEMEC_FS201 ~DATA~DEPTS\PW~AGDRPT~99~0112~PM28657-1 .MAP.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 28657-1
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Monument
TOTAL
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ 1,092,000
$ 175,000
$ 54,000
$ 2,000
$ 1,323,000
DATE: January 12, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ 546,000
$ 87,500
$ 27,000
$ 0
$ 660,500.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ *T.B.P.
$ *T.B.P.
$ 61.00
$ 4.00
$ 890.00
$ 250.00
$ 1,205.00
$ o.oo
*T.B.P. - To Be Paid Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
3 ~\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~W~AGDRPT~99\0112%PM28657-1 .MAP.DOC
VA CINI T Y
N.T.S.
MAP
i IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OP CALIFORNIA
i P~4 R CE ~ ~1P Z ~ 6' 5 7- ~
~ a ff ~~~~mm,m/m~. ~ I~ ~ ~': PARCEL 2
EASEMENT NOTES
I&
PARCEL
/ ~
ENfIRONMENTAL CONSTPAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
REXIt t Ol t R. HZR2',f
IN TH~ CITY OJF TEMJ~CUI.4o COUNTY 0t' RIVEItSIDJI'o STATIi' 01' CAHFORNIA
PAR CEL MAP 2 8 6' 5 7- ~
BE~C I aM~IO! OY I PORf]O~ Ot P~ f gD 20P P~aL ~ 4848
GRAPI//C mCi/,g
p.g.~O
P~
PARCI~L
6.53
1
1
PABCI~L
8.48
PARCI~L 4
ITEM 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CiTY MANAGER ///~/~
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
DATE:
~,(~~.oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
Award of Construction Contract for Installation of a Traffic Signal at the
Intersection of Rancho California Road and Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-
29
PREPARED BY:
-"~/~ William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
Brian Gulllot, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a construction contract for the installation of a traffic signal at the subject
intersection to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of $75,269.00, and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
t
Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the
contingency amount of $7,526.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Via Las Colinas was approved by the City Council in the Fiscal Year
1998/99 Capital Improvement Program. Presently, Via Las Colinas does not have a second
point of access, and site distance is limited when egressing onto Rancho California Road. This
traffic signal will provide a means to interrupt heavy traffic to allow vehicles and pedestrians to
safely enter or cross Rancho California Road.
The engineers estimate was for this project was $100,000.00.
Six (6) bids were received and were publicly opened on December 10, 1998, with the following
results:
1. DBX, Inc. $75,269.00
2. Macadee Electric $84,780.00
3. Computer Service Company $89,026.00
4. Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting $90,721.00
5. T & M Electric $91,498.00
6. TDS Engineering $97,625.00
r:~agdrpt\99\0112\pw97-29awd
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found DBX, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for
this project. DBX, Inc. has satisfactorily completed other projects for the City in the past,
including the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Santiago
Road.
The specifications allow ninety (90) working days for completion of the project. Work is
expected to be completed by June 1999.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: This Capital Improvement Project is funded through a combination
of Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding and DIFFFraffic Signal Mitigation Fees.
Adequate funds are available, for the construction contract of $75,269.00 and the contingency
amount of $7,526.90 amounting to a total estimated construction cost of $82,795.90, in Account
No. 210-165-671-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract
r:\agdrpt\99\0112\pw97-29awd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-29
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION A T
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 12th day of January, 1999 by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereina~er referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc.,
hereina~er referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD &
VIA LAS COLINAS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereina~er, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
PROJECT NO. PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS. Copies of these Standard Specifications
are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD &
VIA LAS COLINAS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\cip~projects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of:
SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY NINE DOLLARS and NO
CENTS ($75,269.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed NINETY (90)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\cip~projects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,0O0
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00-$500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\cip~projects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project.
The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the
CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\cip~proiects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation
between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\cip~projects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
DBX, Incorporated
42066 Avenida Alvarado, #C
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 676-0115
By:
Jim Perry, President
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
C ON T RAC T CA-6 R :\c~p~prolects~pw97~pw97-29\contract
ITEM 20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER ~_.. ,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Janua~ 12,1998
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency for Construction and Funding of Front Street Improvements, South
of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06
PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and
the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of
Front Street Improvements south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road - Project No.
PW98-06.
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form
attached to the Agenda Report.
BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Improvement Plan includes improvements of the
west side of Front Street south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road, Project No. PW98-06.
This Improvement is located within the Project Area of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Project Area 1988-1. The Agency's planning also calls for this Project to be completely funded
by the Agency.
The Community Redevelopment Law, a Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220
(b) and (c) specifically authorizes such cooperative agreements allowing a city and a
redevelopment agency to assist each other in the construction and installation of streets, roads,
water, sewer, or drainage facilities.
The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically
authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the
Project Area.
Completion of this Project will promote the goals of the redevelopment, as it will complete
necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement
Program. The Project will also induce private investment in and promote expansion of the
commercial areas served by the interchange within the Project Area through improved freeway
access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the commercial areas
r:\agdrpt\99\0112\coopagrmt98-O6rda
1
served by the interchange within the Project Area.
The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of improvements to the west side
of Front Street south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06 will
implement the funding plans of the City and the Agency.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $265,000 has been budgeted by RDA for this project. Adequate
funds are available in Account No. 280-199-822-5804.
ATTACHMENT: Cooperative Agreement
r:\agdrpt\99\0112\coopagrmt98-O6rda
2
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FOR THE FRONT STREET WIDENING SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD - PROJECT NO. PW98-06
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of January 12, 1999 by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each party
finds and determines to be true and correct:
a. The Community Redevelopment Law at Health and Safety Code Section 33220
authorizes and encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220 (b) and (c)
specifically authorize such cooperative agreements between a city and a redevelopment agency to assist each
other in the construction of widening the west side of Front Street, south of Rancho California Road to Moreno
Road.
b. The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1
specifically authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the Project
Area.
c. The Front Street Widening south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road, Project
No. PW98-06 is a part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan and is located within the Project Area of
Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1.
d. Completion of the Project will benefit the Project Area and will assist in the
elimination of blight within the Project Area as it will complete necessary public infrastructure improvements
as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan within the Project Area, induce private investment in and
promote expansion of the commercial areas served by the interchange within the Project Area through
improved freeway access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the commercial areas
served by the interchange within the Project Area, among others.
community.
No other reasonable means of financing the improvements are available to the
2. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility for the design and
construction of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
3. The City shall undertake the following responsibilities with respect to the Project:
a. Prepare the necessary engineering and environmental studies for the Project;
b. design the necessary improvements for the Project;
c. acquire necessary rights-of-way for the Project;
R:\cip\projecls\pw98\pw98-06\agreement\coop.rda/ajp
1
do
prepare necessary plans, specifications and bid documents for the Project;
obtain all necessary permits and entitlements from Caltrans and other public agencies;
solicit bids and award construction contracts for the Project; and
administer the construction contracts.
4. The Agency shall pay for all Project costs, except for such costs as the City is obligated to
pay pursuant to this Agreement. City shall pay the costs of acquiring the right-of-way for the Project, which
costs shall include the costs of title reports, appraisers, right-of-way agents, and attorneys. Agency shall,
however, reimburse City for its payments made for the value of the right-of-way acquired.
5. The City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the
allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall
be final.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney/Agency General Counsel
R:\cip\projects\pw98\pw98-06\agreement\coop .rda/ajp
2
ITEM 21
ORDINANCE NO. 98-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
REVISE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CORE OF OLD
TOWN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0472)
THE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
as follows:
Section III. F. 2. of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to read
"2. Parking
The parking requirements for the Specific Plan shall be the same as delineated in
Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code, except that parking requirements for uses
within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) and Community Commercial and Tourist
Support (CCTS) Districts shall be 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area
unless the Development Code would normally require fewer parking spaces.
Section 2.
following findings:
Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan
and the Old Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking
spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of
desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the
surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
Section 3. Environmental Determination. This project represents solely a funding
mechanism to implement previously adopted community plans. Approval of this funding
mechanism does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any
potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific
Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well
as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Ords\98-22 1
Section 5. Sunset Clause. The Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan approved by
this Ordinance shall be a limited term amendment and shall be effective for a period of four (4)
months from the effective date of this Ordinance. At the expiration of the four month term of the
Amendment approved by this Ordinance, the provisions of Section I II.F.2., Parking, of the Old Town
Specific Plan in effect on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall be reinstated and in full force
and effect, unless the City Council adopts a further ordinance amending said section. Developments
which utilize the parking requirements of this Ordinance during the four month term of this Ordinance
shall be entitled to rely upon such parking standards to the extent otherwise allowed by law and shall
not be required to modify parking at the conclusion of the four month period.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the City Council members voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan VV. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords\98-22 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 98-22 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of December, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on
the 12th day of January, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Ords\98-22 3
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DECEMBER 8, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
8:43 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans,
Roberrs, and Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 10, 1998.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
2 Proposed Residential Street Li.qhting Fee - Parcel Mal3 No. 26488
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ORDERING, CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1998, FOR
PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 1-4 WITHIN PARCEL
MAP NO. 26488 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B
RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
1999-00 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6, OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
2.2
Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion,
Return, and Tabulation of the Ballots;
2.3
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant
to the aforementioned process.
Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (as per written material),
advising that it is being recommended that the election date be set for January 22, 1999.
At this time, President Stone opened the public hearing. There being no public input, the
public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to concur with the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Naming of City Park
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve a recommendation from the Community Services Commission to
name the 4.5 acre park site, located on Margarita Road, Winchester Creek
Park.
Community Services Director Parker reviewed the staff report (of record).
In response to Director Roberrs' comment, President Stone suggested that staff be directed
to review and make a recommendation to the Community Services District with regard to the
dedication of a tree to John Dedovesch at Winchester Creek Park because of his
instrumental efforts associated with the planning of this park.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Deputy Director of Community Services commented on the success of the City's Sixth
Annual Santa's Electric Light Parade, noting that the parade included 84 entries and
approximately 20,000 spectators. She advised that the parade was professionally filmed
and that it will be broadcast on the City's Public Access Cable Station. Ms. Ruse presented
a viewing copy of the parade to each Councilmember.
Community Services Director Parker further commented on upcoming Holiday Festivities
such as the Holiday Lights and Festive Sites Contest, Breakfast with Santa, and Snow
Frolic.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Bradley commended Mr. Parker on the increased number of bands that
participated in the parade this year.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:51 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 15, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 8, 1998
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:52
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Stone,
Roberrs, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 17, 1998.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:52 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 15, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Agency Members
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the City of Temecula for Construction
and Funding of the Front Street Improvements, South of Rancho California
Road to Moreno Road - Project PW98-06
PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency Board:
Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for the Front Street Improvements, south
of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06.
Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially
the form attached to the Agenda Report.
Authorize the budgeted expenditure of $265,000.00 by the Redevelopment Agency for the
Agency's share of costs to date for the west side of Front Street Improvements south of
Rancho California Road, to Moreno Road, as well as authorize the expenditure for future
project costs incurred as approved by the City or Agency.
BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Improvement Plan includes the improvements
of the west side of Front Street south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road. This
improvement is located within the Project Area of the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area
1988-1. The Agency's planning also calls for this Project to be completely funded by the
Agency.
The Community Redevelopment Law, a Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220
(b) and (c) specifically authorizes such cooperative agreements allowing a city and a
redevelopment agency to assist each other in the construction and installation of streets, roads,
water, sewer, or drainage facilities.
The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically
authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the
Project Area.
r:\agdrpt\99\0112\rdacoop98-06
1
Completion of this Project will promote the goals of the redevelopment, as it will complete
necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement
Plan. The Project will also induce private investment in and promote expansion of the
commercial areas served by the interchange within the Project Area through improved freeway
access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the commercial areas
served by the interchange within the Project Area.
The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of the widening of the west side
of Front Street, south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road will implement the funding
plans of the City and the Agency.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $265,000.00 has been budgeted by the Agency for these
projects. Funds have been appropriated in the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Project
Funds for these projects. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 280-199-822-5804.
ATTACHMENT:
Cooperative Agreement
r:\agdrpt\99\0112\rdacoop98-06
2
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FOR THE FRONT STREET WIDENING SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD - PROJECT NO. PW98-06
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of January 12, 1999 by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each party
finds and determines to be true and correct:
a. The Community Redevelopment Law at Health and Safety Code Section 33220
authorizes and encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220 (b) and (c)
specifically authorize such cooperative agreements between a city and a redevelopment agency to assist each
other in the construction of widening the west side of Front Street, south of Rancho California Road to Moreno
Road.
b. The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1
specifically authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the Project
Area.
c. The From Sweet Widening south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road, Project
No. PW98-06 is a part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan and is located within the Project Area of
Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1.
d. Completion of the Project will benefit the Project Area and will assist in the
elimination of blight within the Project Area as it will complete necessary public infrastructure improvements
as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan within the Project Area, induce private investment in and
promote expansion of the commercial areas served by the interchange within the Project Area through
improved freeway access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the commercial areas
served by the interchange within the Project Area, among others.
community.
eo
No other reasonable means of financing the improvements are available to the
2. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility/br the design and
construction of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
3. The City shall undertake the following responsibilities with respect to the Project:
a. Prepare the necessary engineering and environmental studies for the Project;
b. design the necessary improvements for the Project;
c. acquire necessary rights-of-way for the Project;
R:\eip\projects\pw98\pw98-06\agreement\eoop .rda/ajp
1
d. prepare necessary plans, specifications and bid documents for the Project;
e. obtain all necessary permits and entitlements from Caltrans and other public agencies;
f. solicit bids and award construction contracts for the Project; and
g. administer the construction contracts.
4. The Agency shall pay for all Project costs, except for such costs as the City is obligated to
pay pursuant to this Agreement. City shall pay the costs of acquiring the right-of-way for the Project, which
costs shall include the costs of title reports, appraisers, right-of-way agents, and attorneys. Agency shall,
however, reimburse City for its payments made for the value of the right-of-way acquired.
5. The City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the
allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall
be final.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney/Agency General Counsel
R:\cip\projects\pw98\pw98-06\agreement\coop.rda/ajp
2
ITEM
22
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY ,~
/
DIRECTOR OF FIN < _.,
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director ~
January 12, 1999
Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) - An Amendment to the
City's Zoning Map, adding Planned Development Overlay No. 2 (PDO-2), with
Corresponding Changes to the Development Code
Prepared by: Patty Andere, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning
Amendment); and
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled "AN ORDIANANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO ADD A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 (PDO-2) TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF
MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004, AND ADDING
SECTION 17.22.110 THROUGH 17.22.118 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97o0397.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA 98-0398
(Tentative Tract Map 28810) and PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment for Planned Development Overlay
District No. 2) on December 2, 1998. The Planned Development Overlay (PDO) is being used to
allow flexibility in Development Standards and overall project density. The current zoning
designation is H (High Density Residential 13-20 dwelling units/acre) which allows attached multi-
family units. The proposed PDO would allow detached single-family units at 11 dwelling units per
acre on the site. The Planning Commission conditionally approved Planning Application No. PA98-
0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810) and recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA98-
0397(Zoning Amendment for PDO-2) by a 4-0 vote (Commission Webster abstained).
DISCUSSION:
The provisions allowing the creation of Planned Development Overlays are contained in Chapter
17.22 of the Development Code. The stated purpose of the Planned Development Overlay Zoning
District is to allow for the creation of modified zoning standards in areas that are too small for a
specific plan, not located appropriately for a village center, and that further the implementation of the
General Plan. The proposed standards are modified from the underlying development standards
of the High Density zoning designation.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
1
The Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) would create customized zoning
requirements to allow high density zero lot-line, detached and attached residential developments.
The proposed PDO would prohibit ten of the existing permitted and conditionally permitted uses such
as mobile home parks, public utility facilities and kennels from the High Density Residential zone.
The prohibited uses were determined to be incompatible with this in-fill parcel given the fact that the
subject site is surrounded by existing detached residential and multi-residential development. The
PDO also allows several uses that appear to be compatible with this location such as a day care
center, a residential care facility, and a congregate care facility. A comparison of the various
permitted uses for the High Density Zoning designation and the proposed PDO Zone are contained
in Attachment No. 4.
Staff believes that the tailored list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses and the modified
development standards on the proposed Planned Development Oveday District provide appropriately
flexible and design standards that are necessary to allow reasonable development in a manner
compatible with the surrounding area, A copy of the proposed overlay zoning is contained in Exhibit
A of Attachment No. 2.
SPECIFIC ACTION: The approval of the PDO would create an overlay on the City's Zoning Map and
would result in adding a Section (PDO-2) to the Development Code.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachments:
3.
4.
5.
Ordinance No. 99- - Page 3
Exhibit A - Proposed Development Overlay District
Planning Commission Staff Report (December 2, 1998) - Page 11
Planning Commission Minutes (December 2, 1998)- Page 12
Comparison of the Existing and Proposed Uses - Page 13
Exhibits - Page 16
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO. I
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDIANANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO ADD A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 (PDO-2) TO THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004, AND
ADDING SECTION 17.22.110 THROUGH 17.22.118 TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
NO. 2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0397.
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall
be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, them is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private property
and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on December 2,
1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City Zoning
Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999 to
consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoning Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 921-370-004: change the Zoning designation from
High Density Residential (H) to Planned Development Overlay No. 2 (PDO-2).
Section 2. Planned Development Overlay No. 2 The City Council hereby adopts the
supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-2, Planned Development Overlay District No. 2
as contained in Exhibit A of this ordinance.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
4
Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained
in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments are accurately
described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the General Plan
and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General Plan on City of Temecula
and its surrounding areas.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage;
and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\STAFFRFF\397pa98 cc staff report.doe
5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of
, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
6
EXHIBIT A
MARGARITA ROAD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.110 Title
Sections 17.22,110 through 17.22.118 shall be known as "PDO-2" (Margarita Road Planned
Development Overlay District).
17.22.112 Purpose and intent
The Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-2) is intended to provide
regulations for a pedestrian oriented small-lot transitional development. It is the intent of the City to
create special regulations that will allow for a specific small-lot single family residential product to
serve as a transitional development between adjacent attached and detached residential areas. It
is expected that any detached or zero lot-line residential product will conform to the Planning
Commission's approved building footprints and elevations. For the purposes of this regulation,
duplexes and two-family attached residential units can be approved as detached residential units.
17.22.114 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Margarita
Road Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.116.
B. The development and design standards are contained Section 17.22.118.
this area.
In addition, the following requirements shall also apply to all planning applications in
1. The citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application
is deemed complete.
2. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in
effect at the time an application is deemed complete.
3. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
17.22.116 Use Regulations
The list of permitted land uses for the Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay district is
contained in Table 17.22.116. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a permitted use.
A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional
use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone.
Table 17.22.116
Residential Districts
Description of Use
PDO-2
Residential
Single-family detached P~
Duplex (two-family dwellings) P~
Single-family attached (greater than two units) P
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\STAFFRFF\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
7
Table 17.22.116
Residential Districts
Description of Use
Multiple-family
Manufactured homes
Mobilehome park
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
children (six or fewer)
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
children (seven to twelve)
handicapped,
handicapped,
or dependent
or dependent
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer)
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or more)
Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer)
Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more)
Congregate care residential facilities for the Elderly
Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities
Secondary dwelling units
Granny Flat
Guest House
Family day care homes-small
Family day care homes-large
Day care centers
Bed and breakfast establishments
Emergency shelters
Transitional housing
Nonresidential
Agriculture/open space uses
Religious institutions
Public utility facilities
Educational institutions
Public libraries
Public museums and art galleries (not for profit)
Kennels and catteries
Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats
Temporary real estate tract offices
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard
Parking for commercial uses
Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls
Convalescent facilities
Golf courses
Home occupations
Construction Trailers 4
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\STAFFRFF\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
8
or neglected
or neglected
PDO-2
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
p3
p3
P
P
C
P
P
P
C
P
C2
P
P
P
Legend
Table 17.22.116
Residential Districts
Description of Use PDO-2
Detached residential or zero lot-line units, duplexes and two-family dwellings are permitted
only with the approval of the Planning Commission.
Subject to the provisions of Section 17.24.020(D)(2).
Allowed only with a single-family residence.
The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an
Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the construction trailer will not have
an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses.
P = Permitted by right in the district
C = Permitted by conditional use permit
- = Use is prohibited in the district
17.22.118 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
A. The development standards listed below are the minimum standards for development
with the respective zoning districts. It is intended that these standards will be met in addition to the
residential performance standards of Section 17.06.070. Considerations for approval of development
plans and for awarding density bonuses will be based upon both the development standards and the
degree of conformance with the performance standards. In the event of a conflict between the
development standards and the performance standards, the director of planning shall determine
which requirement best implements the intent of the development code.
Table 17.22.118
Development Standards Residential Districts
Residential Development Standards
Minimum net lot area
Minimum average net lot area per dwelling unit
Dwelling units per net acre~
LOT DIMENSIONS
Minimum lot frontage at front property line
Minimum lot frontage for a flag lot at front property line
Minimum width at required front setback area
Minimum average width
Minimum lot depth
Minimum front yard
Minimum corner side yard
Minimum interior side yard
Minimum rear yard
Maximum height
Maximum percent of lot coverage
Open space required
Private open space/per unit
SETBACKS
PDO-2
2,700 sq. ft.
2,400 sq. ft.
20
30 ft.
12fi.
40 ft.
40 ft.
55 ft.
8 ft. Ave?
0ft.2
0ft.3
5ft.
35 ft.
50% 4
30% 5
120 sq. ft.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc s~aff report.doc
9
Table 17.22.118
Development Standards Residential Districts
Residential Development Standards
Notes:
PDO-2
Senior citizen housing or congregate care facilities: For attached residential products:
up to thirty dwelling units per acre are permitted. For detached residential products: up to
twenty units per acre are permitted.
Variable front yard setbacks: For attached residential products: Front yard setbacks shall
have an average of at least twenty feet. For detached residential products: Garage
entrances facing the street shall have a minimum setback of sixteen feet from the back of
the curb.
Variable interior side yard setbacks: For attached residential products: vadable side yard
setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks is not less than ten
feet and the distance between adjacent structures is not less than ten feet. This permits
a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and ten feet on the
opposite site yard. For detached residential products: variable side yard setbacks may be
permitted provided in a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side and a
minimum of three feet on the opposite side yard. No encroachments are permitted within
the three foot side yard setback area.
Maximum Lot Coverage: For attached residential products the maximum lot coverage
shall be thirty percent.
Open Space Requirements: Shall apply only to attached residential developments.
B. Supplemental Design and Setback Standards. The following additional requirements
shall also apply to detached residential products constructed in this zone.
1. Detached accessory structures shall be located only in the within specific
allowable buildable areas.
2. Attached accessory structures attached to the primary residential units shall
maintain a minimum separation of three feet from all other structures.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 2, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRFF\397pa98 cc staff report.doe
11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 2, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and
Planning Application No. PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810)
Prepared By: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department Staff recommends the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No.
PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative
Tract Map 28810); and
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-
0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810); and
,
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending to the City
Council approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0397
(Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map
28810); based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in
the Staff Report, public testimony received at the public
hearing, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Leah Taylor
REPRESENTATIVE:
Larry Markham, Markham & Associates
PROPOSAL:
The subdivision of 7.31 acres into 78 single family lots
(including product review) and two open space/park lots, and
a Zoning Amendment from High Density Residential to a PDO
(Planned Development Oveday) zoning classification.
LOCATION:
The south side of Margarita Road approximately 1,400 feet
east of Moraga Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
H (High Density)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
LM (Low Medium Density Residential)
H (High Density Residential)
M (Medium Density Residential)
H (High Density)
R:\staffrpfi397&398pc(Recvd)..do~ vgw 1 IF25/98 I
PROPOSED ZONING: PDO (Planned Development Oveday Zone)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: H (High Density Residential)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
North: Existing detached, single family residential
development.
South: An approved apartment complex under
construction.
East: An approved condominium project, and further
east is an existing single family residential
development.
West: An apartment complex currently under
construction.
Total Area: 7.31 (gross) acres and 7.23 (net) acres
Total Site Area:
Number of Units Per Acre Allowed in the High-Density Residential zone:
13-20 per acre
Number of Units provided within the Proposed PDO:
11 per acre
Parking Required: 2 spaces/unit
Parking Provided: 2 spaces/unit and 16 guest parking spaces
Square Eootages:
Building Height:
Plan 1:
Plan 2:
Plan 3:
Plan 4:
1,807 square feet
1,802 square feet
2,014 square feet
1,902 square feet
Twenty Eight Feet (28')
Twenty Six Feet (26')
Thirty Two Feet (32')
Twenty Eight, Six Inches (28'-6")
BACKGROUND
Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA98-0398
(Tentative Tract Map 28810) was submitted to the Planning Department on September 24, 1998.
The application was scheduled for a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting on October
15, 1998. The project was deemed complete on November 4, 1998.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is for the subdivision of 7.31 acres into 78 single family lots (including product review)
and two open space/park lots (PA No. 98-0398), and a Zoning Amendment from High Density
Residential to a PDO (Planned Development Oveday) zoning classification (PA No. 98-0398
Tentative Tract Map 28810).
R:\staffrpt~97&.398pc(Rocvd). ,doc vgw 11/25/98 2
ANALYSIS
Site Desicon
The existing zoning of the subject site is H (High Density Residential) which is intended to'allow
multi-family development at a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is
proposing a reduction in density to develop small, detached single family parcels to accommodate
zero lot line homes. The zero lot line homes are all two stories and range from 1,802 to 2,014
square feet with small rear and back yards. Plans 2 and 4 provide a gated ddveway that serves as
a fenced front yard use area. The internal roads are private and include sidewalks on one side of the
street to allow internal pedestrian circulation throughout the development.
Although the minimum number of units per acre in the H (High Density Residential) zone is 13, the
proposed PDO (Planned Development Oveday) zoning allows a reduction in density to 11 units per
acre. Pursuant to the Development Code Chapter 17.22, Planned Development Oveday, the PDO
allows modification to the underlying development standards to allow greater flexibility in reaching
goals and policies of the General Plan, and requires City Council approval to modify the zoning map.
In addition, the applicant has submitted modified development standards (see Exhibit G) to
accommodate the proposed zero lot line structures. The "Planned Development Oveday" (Exhibit
H) which illustrates the building envelopes for each lot is also being proposed. The building
envelopes have been established to allow the addition of patio or shade structures. The project will
be conditioned for all accessory structures to be located within the building envelope, as depicted
on Exhibit H).
The subject parcel is an in-fill lot, as it is the last piece of property to receive development approval
in the immediate area. The amenities for the development include a passive park located at the
northeast comer and a park in the interior of the development that has a pool, a club house and a
tot lot.
The project will also be conditioned to submit an acoustical study prior to the issuance of grading
permits to determine noise levels generated by future build-out traffic conditions. The study shall
include mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to ensure compliance with General Plan noise
level standards for residential units potentially impacted from the traffic noise along Margarita Road.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
The project will take access from one entrance off of Margarita Road that is restricted to right in/right
out only. There is one private road that provides circulation throughout the development. The
project access and circulation is complies with the City's Development Code, General Plan and
Subdivision Ordinance. Therefore, the project is consistent with the existing traffic patterns in the
area.
Architecture
The proposed project offers four different elevations which have a country influence. The side and
rear elevations have been enhanced from the initial submittal with the addition of window treatments.
The proposed structures are very similar to the detached condominium project that was approved
by the Planning Commission on August 5, 1998. The proposed homes also serve as a good
transitional development between the apartments to the south and west, the detached
condominiums to the east, and detached single family residential developments to the north and
further east. Staff feels the proposed development is a high quality design that is very compatible
with the surrounding development in terms of density, site design, product type, colors and materials,
and bulk and mass.
R:~siaffrptx,397&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 3
LandscapinQ
A passive park is proposed to be located at the northeast comer or the development. In addition,
the project proposes a park in the interior of the development with a club house and a tot lot. Due
to the small size of the lots, the applicant is proposing modified landscape standards that are
appropriate for the small, zero lot line parcels. Minimum front yard landscaping includes a small lawn
area, a vadety of shrubs, a 15 gallon street tree (Fem Pine) and a one (1)15 gallon accent tree (Red
Crepe Myrtle). Staff feels the landscaping standards as illustrated on the conceptual landscape plan
are appropriate and in proper proportion to the size of the lots.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation and current zoning for the site is H (High Density
Residential). A Planned Development Oveday (PDO) Zone which reduces the minimum density is
permitted pursuant to Chapter 17.22 of the Development Code, and a Tentative Tract Map (including
product review) is permitted pursuant to compliance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance No. 460
and the City's Design Guidelines. The project, as proposed, is consistent with the Development
Code, General Plan and Design Guidelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered
to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions
of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated.
SUM MARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project consists of the subdivision of 7.31 acres into 78 single family lots (including product
review) and two open space/park lots (PA No. 98-0398), and a Zoning Amendment from High
Density Residential to a PDO (Planned Development Oveday) zoning classification (PA No. 98-0398
Tentative Tract Map 28810). The PDO allows the property to be developed below the minimum
density of the existing High Density Residential Zoning classification (13-20 units per acre) to a
density of 11 units per acre. The site proposes one point of access from Margarita Road and
provides internal access throughout the site. The proposed product is very compatible with the
surrounding area in terms of site layout, product type, colors and materials, and bulk and mass.
FINDINGS - Tentative Tract Map
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
,
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety
and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the
standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The
proposed land division of the project is consistent with the Citys General Plan target land use
designation and therefore meets the goals and policies of the General Plan.
R:\s-ffrpt~39?&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11r25/98 4
That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, Subdivision and Landscaping Ordinances. The project
is consistent with these documents and conditions of approval have been placed on the
project accordingly to assure that the development conforms to City Standards.
That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development.
The physical characteristics of the site (topography, drainage, access, etc.) was specifically
designed to accommodate the proposed land division as the subject site is an in-fill lot with
a slightly irregular shape.
,
That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of
the development. The project site is an in-fill lot with an irregular shape. The proposed
density was specifically determined as a result of the physical characteristics of the lot
(shape, topography, etc.). As a result, the proposed development is proposing a reduction
in density to 11 units per acre instead of the 13-20 units per acre, which is permitted under
the existing High Density zoning classification. The proposed reduction in density is
consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation target density.
,
That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat. The Biological report submitted with the project stated that there is
not fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The project is conditioned to obtain all necessary permits and or
clearances from the applicable environmental agencies. It is determined that the project, as
conditioned, will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources,
as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
That the design of the proposed land division or the types of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed for conformance with
the City's General Plan, Development Code, Subdivision and Landscaping Ordinances. The
project is consistent with these documents and conditions of approval have been placed on
the project accordingly to assure that the development conforms to City Standards.
That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate
easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent
to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of
record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The
project will take access from Margarita Road, and will not obstruct any easements.
FINDINGS - Zoning Amendment
,
That the proposed Zoning Amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of
the community. The project was designed and is conditioned to comply with all City
Ordinances, Development Code, CityWide Design Guidelines and the General Plan.
Therefore, as condition, the project will be compatible with the health, safety and welfare of
the community.
That the proposed Zoning Amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan. The
proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan which allows
for flexibility in the zoning to allow a range of transitions of densities.
R:\slaffrptL397&_398pc(Recvd)..doc v&,w 11/25/98 5
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed project is very similar
to the recently approved condominium project to the east. The project serves as a good
transitional development as there are apartments to the south and west, detached
condominiums to the east, and detached single family residential developments to the north
and further east. Staff feels the proposed development is a high quality design that is very
compatible with the surrounding development in terms of density, site design, product type,
colors and materials, and bulk and mass.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, as the project is very
compatible to the existing developments in terms of density, site design, product type, colors
and materials and bulk and mass.
The changes proposed in the Zoning Amendment represent a decrease in the density from
High Density Residential to PDO (Planned Development Overly) and will not increase the
impacts associated with the proposed tentative tract map or subsequent future development
of the property.
Attachments:
PC Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map 28810 - Blue Page 7
A. Conditions of Approval- Blue Page 11
PC Resolution Approving the Zoning Amendment - Blue Page 19
A. Draft City Council Ordinance recommending Approval of Zoning Amendment -
Blue Page 22
Initial Study- Blue Page 26
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 27
Exhibits - Blue Page 28
A,
B,
C
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
V.!cinity Map
General Plan Map
Zoning Map
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Elevations
Development Standards
Planned Development Oveday (With Approved Building Envelopes)
R:~staffrpt~397&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98 -
R:~ga~mt~397&398p~(RecvdL.do¢ v~v 11/25/98 7
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-
0398 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 28810) FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF
7.31 ACRES INTO 78 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (INCLUDING
PRODUCT REVIEW) AND.TWO OPEN SPACE/PARK LOTS WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 7.31 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
MARGARITA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF
MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-
004.
WHEREAS, Leah Taylor filed Planning Application No. PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map
28810); and in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810); and was
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0398
(Tentative Tract Map 28810); on December 2, 1998, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed
by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in
opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810); makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt.
Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
R:\slafftpt'G97&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 8
C. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The
project site has not been recently graded or disturbed. The biological assessment (dated September
1998) submitted with the project states that there are no native species of plants, no unique, rare,
threatened or endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site: The
report also states that there is no indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as
a migration corridor.
specific plans.
That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and
E. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
of development.
That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type
G. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development.
H. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems.
I. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property
within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that altemate
easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to
ones previously _.acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or
to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction.
Section 3. Environmental Comoliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of
Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810) for the subdivision of 7.31 acres
into 78 single family lots (including product review) and two open space/park lots with associated
parking and landscaping on a proposed parcel containing acres 7.31 acres located on the south side
of Margarita Road approximately 1,400 feet east of Moraga Road, known as Assessors Parcel No.
921-370-004 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and
made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
R:\slaffrptL397&398pc(Rocvd)..do¢ vgw 11/25/98 9
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of December
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\staffrpt~397&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 10
ATTACHMENT 1
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~staffrpt~97&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw i 1/25/98 11
EXHIBIT "a"
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-O397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative
Tract Map 28810)
Project Description: Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) from
High Density Residential to a PDO (Planned Development Overlay) zoning classification
and PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810) for the subdivision of 7.31 acres into 78
single family lots (including product review) and two open space/park lots with
associated parking and landscaping on a proposed parcel containing acres 7.31 acres
located on the south side of Margarita Road approximately 1,400 feet east of Morega
Road.
Assessors Parcel No.: 921-370-004
Approval Date: December 2, 1998
Expiration Date: December 2, 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning
Division .a_ cashjerks check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount
of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One
Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City
Ordinance, upon wdtten request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection,
the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval
of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
R:\staffrpt~397&398pc(R¢cvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 12
Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim,
action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in
the defense of the action. The City reserves its dght to take any and all action the City
deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasincl plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The project shall comply with the Planned Development Oveday (PDO) development
standards, approved building envelopes (Exhibit H) and the approved Landscape Plan
(Exhibit E). All standards not addressed within the PDO standards shall be subject to the
City of Temecula's Development Code, City-Wide Design Guidelines and General Plan.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Division.
,
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
The applicant shall submit a cultural resource management report following guidelines for
Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic
Preservation. With the mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
10.
The applicant shall submit an acoustical study to determine the noise levels associated with
future build-out traffic conditions. The study shall include mitigation measures to reduce
noise levels that comply with the General Plan noise level standards for residential units. All
mitigation measures shall be in place prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
the affected units
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
11. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
a. A copy of the Final Map.
b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
1 ) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California
Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance
No. 655.
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
R:\staffrpt~397&398pc(Recvd)..do~ v~w I 1/25/98 13
1)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, fence ownership and
repair responsibilities, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open
areas including parkways.
2)
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the
dght to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have
any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities
in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the
expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services.
Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions
required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of
compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to
making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the
City for public purposes.
3)
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas
and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association owning the common areas and facilities.
Prior to Issuanc.e of Building Permits
12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
1)
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
2) One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
3)
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
4)
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the
approved plan).
5)
Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all
ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and
adjacent property for:
a. Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of
building permits for any lot(s).
b. Private common areas prior to issuance of the first building permit.
R:x. sLaffrpt~397&398pc(Rccvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 14
All landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall
include, but may not be limited to pdvate slopes and common areas.
Shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a
public right-of-way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger.
6) Hardscaping for the following:
a. Pedestrian trails within pdvate common areas
Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the
height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences:
1)
Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a Public Right-
of-Way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger and the side yards for comer
lots. The wall along Margarita Road and the comer lots shall be screened
so that the visible portion of the wall is no more six (6) feet.
2)
Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take
advantage of views for side and rear yards.
3)
Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not
restricted by a and b above.
Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including
al! structural setback measurements.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision,
however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits
13.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Manager, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen vadous components of the project.
14.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved
construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The
plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be
propedy constructed and in good working order.
15. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for insl~ection.
16.
Pdvate common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the
last occupancy permit (excluding the model home conversion).
17.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee
the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a pedod of one year, in
accordance with the approved construction landscape and irTigation plan, shall be filed with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final
certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been
maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
R:\staffrpt~97&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98
18.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
19.
Memorandum dated November 19, 1998, from the Department of Public Works stating the
conditions of approval is incorporated heroin and made a part of this approval.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
20.
All common slope areas, parkway landscaping, walls, private parks and interior residential
street lighting shall be maintained by a private Homeowner's Association (HOA).
21.
Prior to installation of arterial street lighting on Margarita Road, the applicant or his assignee
shall pay the appropriate fees for the dedication and transfer of said street lights into the
TCSD maintenance program.
22.
A Class II bike lane shall be identified on the street improvement plans and completed in
concurrence with the street improvements.
23.
Construction of the landscaped median on Margarita Road shall commence pursuant to a
pre-job meeting with the developer and the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to
comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude the acceptance of this
area into the TCSD maintenance program.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE MAP:
24.
The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment
of in-lieu fees equivalent to .51 acres of parkland. Said requirement includes a 50% credit
for two (2) private park facilities to be constructed within the development. The amount of
the in-lieu fee shall be calculated by multiplying the required amount of parkland by the City's
then current appraised land valuation as established by the City Manager.
25.
Landscape construction plans for the raised median within Margadta Road shall be reviewed
and approved by the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
26.
It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the
TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
27.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
R:\staffrpt\397&398pc(Recvd)..doe vgw 11/25/98 16
28.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site standard fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s)
in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2,
and Appendix Ill-B)
29.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project
on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2)
30.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (UFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460)
31.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
32.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are
installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
70,000 Ibs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
33.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion
of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( UFC sec
902 and Ord 95-15)
34.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet
six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15) All curbs on 24 foot wide streets to be
painted red with white lettering "No Parking CVC 22500.1" or approved signage.
35.
Pdor to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
36.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1) Because
of the limitations placed on this project and limited frontage, the width of road on each side
of the entrance medium shall be a minimum of 24 feet clear width in lieu of the normally
required second access.
37.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed
by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans
are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed
and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials
being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection
Association 24 1-4.1 )
R:\staffrptX397&398pc(R¢cvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 17
28.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site standard fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s)
in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2,
and Appendix Ill-B)
29.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project
on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2)
30.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (UFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460)
31.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor
to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
32.
33.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall 'have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are
installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
70,000 Ibs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion
of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( UFC sec
902 and ~)rd 95-15)
34.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet
six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15) All curbs on 24 foot wide streets to be
painted red with white lettering "No Parking CVC 22500.1" or approved signage.
35.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
36.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1) Because
of the limitations placed on this project and limited frontage, the width of road on each side
of the entrance medium shall be a minimum of 24 feet clear width in lieu of the normally
required second access.
37.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall fumish one copy of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed
by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans
are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed
and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials
being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection
Association 24 1-4.1 )
R:~sl~ffrpt~397&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25198 17
38.
Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3)
39.
Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument
sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each
complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the
name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant
locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau pdor to installation.
40.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902,4)
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit
41.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation fees.
OTHER AGENCIES
42.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittals dated October 6, 1998 copies of which
are attached.
43.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districrs transmittal October 5, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
44.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated October 19, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Eastern Information
Center's transmittal dated October 30, 1998 a copy of which is attached.
46.
Memo dated November 19, 1998, from the Department of Public Works, stating conditions
of approval are incorporated herein and made a part of this approval.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Signature
R:\staffrpt\397&398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 18
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
/~Anders, Assistant Planner
"
Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for:
Tentative Tract Map No. 28810
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project.
Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency.
General Requirements
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
s
A Grading. Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of-way,
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works pdor to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
5, The vehicular movement for Private Drive "C" shall be restricted to dght in/right out,
Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
wdtten clearance from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
· Rancho Califomia Water Distdct
· Eastern Municipal Water District
· Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
· City of Temecula Fire Bureau
R:~LANDDEV\COA~UBDIV\TR28810.DOC
· Planning Department
· Department of Public Works
· Riverside County Health Department
· Cable TV Franchise
Community Services District
· General Telephone
· Southern Califomia Edison Company
· Southern Califomia Gas Company
· Fish & Game
· Army Corps of Engineers
The Developer shall design, construct and install the following public improvements to City
of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works:
Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include 11 feet
dedication of street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and
striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot raised
landscaped median.
A continuous 14 foot wide raised landscaped median on Margarita Road from the
westedy property boundary (Tuscany Ridge Apartments - Tract 3334 Lot 27) to the
eastedy property boundary (Tentative Tract Map No. 28850). The Developer can
receive Development Impact Fee credits for the other half of the raised landscaped
median.
AlLstreet improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
d. Storm drain facilities
e. All utilities shall be undergrounded
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design
of the street improvement plans:
ae
Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Ddveway shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A.
Street light shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400
and 401.
ee
Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
f. All street and ddveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
R: ~ANDDEV\COA~SUBDIV~TR28810. DOC
10.
11.
12.
13,
14.
15,
16.
17,
18.
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable Tv shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utili{ies shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of PUblic Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Margarita Road on the Final Map with
the exception of the one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public
or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons
such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
Department of Public Works
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an
existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Pdor to
City Council approval of the final map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency, :.: .:.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
An Envir0~mental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final
map to delineate identffied environmental concerns. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted
to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secudty of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developers cost. 'The 'appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
R:~ANDDEVx, COA~SUBDIV~TR28810.DOC
19.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on
the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easement~ shall be
kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
20.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
· Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
· Planning Department
· Department of Public Works
21.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
22.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections.
23.
A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of
the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private,
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an
adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or
private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all
facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm
water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis
and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
24.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
25.
The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
26.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier s check
or money order, pdor to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
R:~LANDDEV\COA~SUBDIV~TR28810.DOC
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
27.
The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
28.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent
of any other lot.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
29. Final Map shall be approved and recorded.
30.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certffied by a registered Civil Engineer for location
and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
31.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
32.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
33.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
wdtten clearance from the following agencies:
· Rancho California Water District
· Eastern Municipal Water District
· Department of Public Works
34.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
35.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
36.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due
to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
R:~LANDDEV~COA~SUBDIV\TR28810.DOC
Tuesday November 17, 1998 3:05pm -- From #9558903' -- Page 21
11/17/1998 14:47 ~5589e3
PAGE 82/03
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: October6, 1998
The Department of Envlxonmcntal Health has reviewed thi,q Change of Zone No. PA98-0397 and has
no objections.
Sanitary sewer and water services should be available in this area.
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
Tu~ay November 17, 1998 :~:05pm -- From '9558903'
11/17/1998 14:47 9558983
-- Page
FROM
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE:
CITY OF TElVI~CULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATrN: Patty AnL .
TEN'FATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28810 (PA98-0398)
Oetobear 6, 1998
83183
The Department of Environmental Health iS unable to submit tentative recomme. ndations until
receipt of the requested supplemental information concerning water and sewer availability.
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980'
~muil9.&u: .
!Tuesday November 17, 1998 2::Y, pm -- From ,909 696 9175' -- Page 27
' 11/17/98 14:23 FAX 909 694 9175 RCM:) EHGIffi:~'~ING
l~002
October 5 1998.
Ms. Patty Anders. Case Planner
City of Ternecula
Planning Depament"
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecu|a, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
TRACT NO. 28810
APN 921-370-004
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0398
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service. therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
tt may be necessary for the developer to extend on-site and off-site water
facilities to adequately service this developmenL If fire protection is
required, the developer win need to contact RCVVD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing.
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this o~ce.
Sincerely.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
gO/SB:Rtc238/I:O1:I-T1/FCF*
C: Laurie Willinn,s, Engineering Services Supervisor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORT,'~, ,ON AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT l, 404 W. 4th STREET, Ith FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
PETE WILSON. Go~m~'
Ms. Patty Anders
Assistant Planner
43200 Business Park Drive
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
October 19, 1998
08-Riv-15-5.38
Dear Ms. Anders:
Planning Application 98-0397
We have reviewed the above referenced documents and request consideration of
the following comments:
Caltrans supports economic growth and orderly land use development;
however, new development must pay its fair share for upgrading infrastructure
facilities needed to serve the development. This infrastructure includes State
highways and freeways. It also includes both direct and cumulative traffic
impacts. All jurisdictions should take measures available to fund improvements
and reduce total trips generated. In view of the fact there are limited funds
available for infrastructure improvements, we recommend the City of Temecula
take the lead in developing a fair-share mechanism in which each project can
fund improvements for the decrease in Level of Service (LOS) for which it is
responsible.
· Please send a copy of the Plot/Site plan for this proposal.
· Additional comments may be forthcoming upon receipt and review of this site.
jC'.'i S 0 1998
Ms. Patty Anders
October 19, 1998
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact Garrett Miyahira at (909) 383-6212 or FAX
(909) 383-5936.
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Regional Planning/
Forecasting/Publ ic Transportation
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
9JV'BI~DI:
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-.0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
October 30, 1998
Patty Anders
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Case No.:
Applicant:
PA98-0397CZ/PA98-0398TR
Leah Taylor
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please find enclosed our comments for one project transmittal as requested by the Planning
Department. If you have any questions, please contact the Eastern Information Center at
(909) 787-5745.
PA98-0397/PA98-0398 ................................ Oct. 30, 1998
Sincerely,
Martha Smith
Information Officer
Enclosure(s)
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
RIVEI$1DE
Eastern Information Center
University of C81ifomm
Riversicle. CA 92521-0418
Phone (909} 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW
DATE: ~.
R~curds at ~u E~t~rn information Center of ~e C~ifomia Historic~ R~ourc~ Infomation System have
been r~view~ re detemine if ~is proj~t would adversely aff~ prehistoric or historic culmr~ r~o~:
/~o pm~s~ pmj~t ~ h~s not b~ suwe~ for cultural msoumcs end con~s or is ldjiccnt to ~o~ cu~ml
resource(s). A Phase I study is ~ommead~.
Based upon existing data the proposed project am has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase ! study
is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resourec study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the
project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recomme, ed~.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or divcr~ed in the immediate area while
a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should bc monitored by a professional
archaeologist.
~/~The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning ButIda
4(a), December 1989.
Phase i
Phase II
Phase iii
Phase IV
Records search and ~cld survey
Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant' sites.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.]
Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ZONING AMENDMENT
R:~tTrpt~3~T&.398pc(R~cvd)..doc vF 1 lr'ZS~)s
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA PA98-0397 (ZONING AMENDMENT) FROM
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PDO (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY) ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON A
PARCEL CONTAINING 7.31 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST
OF MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-
370-004.
WHEREAS, Leah Taylor filed Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0397
(Zoning Amendment) on December 2, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time int..erested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning
Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment), makes the following findings, to wit:
1. Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment), as proposed, is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project was designed and is
conditioned to comply with all City Ordinances, Development Code, City-Wide Design Guidelines and
the General Plan. Therefore, as condition, the project will be compatible with the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
2. Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) is consistent with the
City's General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General
Plan which allows for flexibility in the zoning to allow a range of transitions of densities.
R:\slaffrpt~397&.398pc(Recvd)..doc vgw 11/25/98 20
3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed project is very
similar to the recently approved condominium project to the east. The project serves as a good
transitional development as there are apartments to the south and west, detached condominiums
to the east, and detached single family residential developments to the north and further east. Staff
feels the proposed development is a high quality design that is very compatible with the surrounding
development in terms of density, site design, product type, colors and materials, and bulk and mass.
5. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, as the project
is very compatible to the existing developments in terms of density, site design, product type, colors
and materials and bulk and mass.
5. The changes proposed in the Zoning Amendment represents a decrease in the
density from High Density Residential to PDO (Planned Development Ovedy) and will not increase
the impacts associated with the proposed tentative tract map or subsequent future development of
the property.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of
Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
adopted.
Section 4. Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends
that the City Council adopt the Ordinance substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) from High
Density Residential to a PDO (Planned Development Oveday) zoning classification substantially in
the from contained herein on property generally located on the south side of Margadta Road
approximately 1,400 feet east of Moraga Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-370-004,
subject to the following conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of December,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:\stsffrpt~397&398pc(Recvd),.doc vgw 11/2.S/98
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
21
EXHIBIT "A"
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ZONING AMENDMENT
'\',TE2vlEC_FS101'd:)ATALDIEpTS,,pLANNi~NG.~-rAFFRFF397&.398pC(Recvd)..do¢
'2:2:
EXHIBIT"A"
ORDINANCE NO. 98-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-
0397 (ZONING AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP
FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PDO (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY) ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON A
PARCEL CONTAINING 7.31 ACRES, FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and arehereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin.qs. The City Council in approving Planning Application No. PA98-0397
(Zoning Amendment ), makes the following findings, to wit:
1. Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment), as proposed, is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project was designed and is
conditioned to co. reply with all City Ordinances, Development Code, City-Wide Design Guidelines and
the General Plan. Therefore, as condition, the project will be compatible with the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
2. Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) is consistent with the
City's General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General
Plan which allows for flexibility in the zoning to allow a range of transitions of densities.
3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed project is very
similar to the recently approved condominium project to the east. The project serves as a good
transitional development as there are apartments to the south and west, detached condominiums
to the east, and detached single family residential developments to the north and further east. Staff
feels the proposed development is a high quality design that is very compatible with the surrounding
development in terms of density, site design, product type, colors and materials, and bulk and mass.
4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, as the project
is very compatible to the existing developments in terms of density, site design, product type, colors
and materials and bulk and mass.
5. The changes proposed in the Zoning Amendment represents a decrease in the
density from High Density Residential to PDO (Planned Development Ovedy) and will not increase
the impacts associated with the proposed tentative tract map or subsequent future development of
the property.
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEFFS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~397&.398PC(Recvd)..doc
Section 3. Environmental ComDliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of
Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
granted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning
Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment), to change the zoning on a 7.31 acre parcel from
High Density Residential to a PDO (Planned Development Overlay) zoning classification on property
located on the south side of Margarita Road approximately 1,400 feet east of Moraga Road and
known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-370-004, and subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A,
in incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary
of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office
of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from
adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with
the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the
office of the City Clerk.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of ,1998.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of ,1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the
__ day of ,1998 by the following roll call vote:
R:\staffrpt~397&.398PCCRecvd)..doc
24
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\staffrpt~397d~398PC(Recvd)..doc
25
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:~tal'l'rptL~g7x'198PCCRe~vd)..do~
26
Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation
Zoning
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Change of Zone) and PA98-
0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
(909) 694°6400
The south side of Margarita Road approximately 1,400 feet east
of Moraga Road.
Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Rd., Ste. N, Temecula, CA 92590
High Density (H)
High Density (H)
The subdivision of 7.31 acres into 78 single family lots (including
product review) and two open space/park lots within a planned
development oveday district.
To the north is an existing, detached, single family residential
development, to the east is an approved condominium development
and further east is an existing single family residential development.
To the west is an apartment complex currently under construction,
and to the south is an approved apartment complex also under
construction.
Fire Department, Health Department, Temecula Police
Department, Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho California
Water District, Riverside County Flood Control, Southern
California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, General
Telephone, U.S Army Corps of Engineers and California
Department of Fish and Game.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
X
X
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
X
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
X
X
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one
effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
Signature
Date
Printed Name
Date
R:\PLANNING\3971~a98eia..doc
2
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
1.a.
1.b.
1.c.
1.d.
1.e.
Issues and Suitorring Information Sources
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or minority
community)?
POtentially
Significant
ImOact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Thin1
S~g~ficant
No
X
X
X
X
Comments:
la,b
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and has a Land Use Designation of H (High
Density 13-20 dwelling units per acre). The site is being developed at a density of approximately 11
units per acre which is well below the maximum density range of 20 units per acre. The proposed
change of zone is to allow development of 11 units per acre which is below the minimum density
requirements of 13 units per acre in the High Density classification. The General Plan Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) analyzed the maximum density allowance for each zoning classification; therefore,
the requested reduction in density is determined to be compatible with, and not be in conflict with the
General Plan or zoning classification. The subject site is an in-fill lot that is proposing development that
will serve as a "good transitional development to the condominium project to the east and the
apartments to the south and west.
The overall impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the
scope the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency.
Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project. Further, all agencies with
jurisdiction over the project are also being given the opportunity to comment on the project and it is
anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific
environmental plans or polices. There will be limited, if any environmental effects on environmental
plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
1.C
The proposed tentative tract map and change of zone will not be incompatible with existing land use,
and will not to be considered incompatible or impact the existing residential tracts and multi-family
housing developments in the vicinity. The project has been proposed at approximately 11 units per
acre which is below the maximum density allowance of 20 units per acre. Although the tentative tract
map is for detached, single family lots, it is very similar to the adjacent condominium project to the east
in terms of lot size, site design, circulation and amenities. Both developments are detached "patio
home" products, and thus, very compatible. The subject project will also serve as a good transitional
development between the existing residential tract developments to the north and further east, and the
high density apartment complexes under construction to the west and south. The project complies with
the City-Wide Design Guidelines, the Development Code and General Plan. The project was designed
to be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of architecture, site design, ingress/egress,
density and landscaping. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
3
1 .d,e
The project will not affect agricultural resources or disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or minority community). There is evidence that a single
family residence was built at this site years ago, but the site is now vacant. Therefore, no established
residential communities (including low-income or minodty communities) are at this site. The trends in
the vicinity have depleted the agricultural significance of the site. No significant effects are not
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia, ,doc
4
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
2,a.
2.c.
Issues and Supporting Infom,,atiotq Sources
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or
extension of major infrastructure)?
Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
IncorOorated
Less Thin
Significant
Impact
No
X
X
Comments:
2.a
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The project will
result in the construction of 78 detached single family residential lots which is consistent with the City's
General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of H (High Density Residential). The proposed
density is approximately 11 units per acre which is below the permitted maximum density of 20 units
per acre. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, and does not exceed the
maximum density, the project will not be a significant contributor to population growth which will
cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
2.b
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project is
consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of H (High Density Residential) and
will primarily serve the housing needs for people in the immediate and surrounding areas. The project
may cause some' people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its limited scale, it will not
induce substantial growth in the area. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
2.c
The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing as the site is a vacant lot that will
be providing moderate priced housing. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving?
3.a.
3.b, X
3.c. X
Issues an~l Supporting Information Sources
Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6)
Seismic ground shaking?
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (Source 1,
Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
3.d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X
3.e. Landslides or mudflows? X
3.f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil X
conditions form excavation, grading or fill?
3.g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 2, Figure 7, Page 68) X
3.h. Expansive soils? X
3.i. Unique geologic or physical features?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Mitigation Significant No
Iml3~act IncorOorated ImOact Im0act
X
X
Comments:
3.a. The project will not result in a less than significant impact on people as a result of fault rupture. The
project is not located in a fault zone or within a fault setback area; therefore no significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
c,g,h
The project may have a potentially significant impact on people involving seismic ground shaking as the
project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. There may also be a
potentially signifi._cant impact from seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils.
Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consisteni
with Uniform Building Code standards. Further, preliminary soil reports shall be submitted which wil~
determine the condition of the soil on the subject site. The soil reports will be reviewed prior to the
issuance of a grading permit to mitigate the project to a level of insignificance. The soil reports will alsc
contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially
significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence or
expansive soils if applicable as a result of the soil reports. After mitigation measures are performed, nc
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d.
The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The project is not located in
an area where any of these hazards could occur. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of
this project.
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental Impact for the
City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site
or within close proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
The project will have a less than significant impact from erosion, changes in topography, grading or fill.
Increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site may occur during the construction phase
of the project and the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. However,
erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-run,
hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project. Since the amount
of grading will be the minimum necessary for the realization of the project, modification to topography
and ground surface relief features will not be considered significant. Potential unstable soil conditions
from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of landscaping, mitigation measures
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
3.i.
contained in the soil reports, and proper compaction of the soils. After mitigation measures are
performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic features or
physical features exist on the site, No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
7
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
4.a.
4.c.
4.d.
4.e.
4.f.
,4.g.
4.h,
4.i.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (Source 2, Figure 13, Page 95 and
Source 2, Figure 30, Page 190; Source 1, Figure 7-4)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity)?
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
Movements?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater.
Otherwise available for public water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
X
X
Lus Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
X
No
X
X
X
X
Comments:
4.a
The project will have a less than signi~can impact to the change in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and mount of surface runoff. The project site is primarily in its natural state but has been
disturbed by regularly dicing of the site for weed control purposes. There is an existing drainage
channel on site that primarily handles urban run off from the development to the east. Some changes
to absorption rates, drainage pattems and the rate and amount of surface runoff is expected whenever
development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered
impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption
rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage
conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle the existing and future
drainage flows. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
4.b.
The project will not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or water
related hazards because the project is not located within a dam inundation area or the 100 year Flood
Boundary as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and
pursuant to FEMA maps. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.c
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and alteration of
surface water quality. Pdor to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be
required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an
NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the
NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. After
mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
4.d
4,e,
4.f-h.
4.i
The project will have a less than significant impact in a change in the amount of surface water in any
waterbody or impact currents. Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable
ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and
driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the additional amount of drainage will not considered
significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project may have a potentially significant impact in the course or direction of water movements.
The site is primarily in its natural state although there is evidence on site that indicates a single family
residence was developed some time ago. The site currently has a drainage channel that traverses the
northern portion of the site. The channel accommodates the drainage (storm water runoff) from the
subdivision to the east. The natural water movement of the drainage channel will be modified as the
channel will be conveyed underground to 'handle the existing and future drainage flows. The project will
be conditioned to obtain all necessary permits and or clearances from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. Therefore with the conditions of approval,
no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. '. ,..
The project will not have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground waters,
either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Limited changes will occur
in the quantity and quality of ground waters; however, due to the minor scale of the project, it will not be
considered significant. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a
significant impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available
for public water supplies. According to information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report
for the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho California Water District indicate that they can
accommodate additional water demands." Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to
the project. Water service will need to be provided by Rancho California Water Distdct (RCWD). This
is typically provided upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property
owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
9
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.8.
5.b.
5.c.
5.d.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Lus Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
X
X
No
Impact
Comments:
5.9.
The project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality
violation. The project (78 residential units with product review) which is below the threshold for
potentially significant air quality impact (166 units) established by South Coast Air Quality Management
District (Page 6-11, Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management CEQA Air Quality
Handbook). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.b.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant pollutants in
proximity to the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.c.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. The
limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the environment in this
area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.d.
The project will create objectionable odors during the construction phase of the project. These impacts
will be of shod duration and are not considered significant.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
10
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
6.a.
6.c.
6.d.
6.e.
6.f.
6.g.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses)?
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)?
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorl~orated
Less Than
Significant
IOq3acT
X
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
6.a.
While the project may result in an incremental increase in traffic congestion, it will result in a less than
significant increase in vehicle trips. It is anticipated that this project will result in a less than significant
increase to the existing traffic volumes dudng the AM peak hour and PM peak hour time frames at the
intersections of Margadta Road and Moraga Road, and the intersection of La Serena Way and
Margarita Road according to standard trip calculation methodologies. The proposed development is in
compliance with the land use and development standards of this zone which was analyzed in the EIR
for the General Plan. Therefore, it is determined that the proposed development will not adversely
affect the LOS for this area, but was included in the EIR analysis. The applicant will be required to pay
traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as conditions of approval for the project. After
mitigation measures are performed and development impact fees paid, no impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
6.b.
The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current
City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from design features. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c.
The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The project is a
single family residential tract with product review in an area with existing and similar planned uses. The
project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. The project does
not provide direct access to nearby uses; therefore, it will not impact access to nearby uses. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.d.
The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. Off-site parking will not be impacted. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.e.
The project will not result in a less than significant impact from hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists. Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part of the project. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.f.
The project will not result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. The
project was transmitted to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and based upon their response to similar
projects in the area, it is not anticipated the project will impact RTA facilities or services. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
11
6.g.
The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterbome or air traffic since none exists currently in the
immediate proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
12
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal result in impacts to:
7.b.
7.c.
7.d.
7.e.
Ismae and Supporting Information Sources
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
Locally designated species (e.g. bedrage trees)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripadan and vernal pool)? ( )
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unleli Mitigation
Incorporated
X
X
~ Then
Significant
No
X
X
X
Comments:
7.a,d
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats,
including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The site is primarily in its natural
state although there is evidence on site that indicates that a single family residence was developed
some time ago. The site also has a drainage channel that traverses the nodhem portion of the site.
The channel primarily accommodates the drainage (storm water runoff) from the subdivision to the
east. A Biological Assessment was prepared in September of 1998 which states that the site does not
possess wetland characteristics; does not have significant biological resources; and none of the wildlife
species observed at the site are listed as Special-Status and Sensitive Animal Species. Therefore, the
Biological Assessment concluded that the project will not result in a direct adverse impact on significant
biological resources (vegetation, habitat, wildlife and/or wetlands).
However, the sar~e drainage channel traverses the two parcels to the east and west of the subject site.
The parcels to the east and west were required to obtain all applicable permits pursuant Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (Army Corps of Engineers) and or Section 1603 of the California Fish and Game
Code. Therefore, staff will be conditioning this project to obtain all necessary permits and or clearances
from California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project site
is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be
required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species. With the conditions of approval, the
required state and federal permitting and/or clearances, and mitigation measures, the project impacts
are anticipated to be mitigated to a level of insignificance.
7.b.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated species are
protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not protected elsewhere in the
City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and since there are no locally designated species on
site, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.c.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities. Reference response
7.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.e.
The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site does
not serve as part of a migration corridor due to its close proximity to extensive urban levels of
development (north, east and west), the regular dicing of the site and the dominance of the site by non-
native species. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
13
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
8.c.
Issues end SuOPorting Information Sources
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
SiOnificant
impact'
X
No
linDact
X
X
Comments:
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project will be
reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation dudng the plan
check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these
applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a
wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily
operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resoumes.
Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
8.c,
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future
value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would be of future
value to the regioh and the residents of the State are located at this project site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this projed.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
14
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.a.
9.d.
9.6.
Issues end Supporting information Sources
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicel or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? '
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
, Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
X
X
X
X
Comments:
9.8.
The project will not result in a dsk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event
of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in this request. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.b.
9.c.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The
subject site is not located in an area that could impact an emergency response plan. The project will
take access from a maintained street and will therefore not impede any emergency response or
emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The project wil
be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check stage. No permits wil
be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significan~
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health hazards
are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
9.6.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush, grass, or trees.
The project is an industrial/warehouse development in an area of existing and future similar uses. The
project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
15
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
10.a.
10.b.
Issues and Sul~ortlng Infomtetion Source~
Increase in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Intact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorl~oreted
~ Than
Significant
.Irnl3act
X
X
No
Cornmerits:
lO.a.
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is currently
vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels dudng construction
phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. Long-term noise generated by this
project would be similar to existing and proposed uses in the area. No significant noise impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project in either the short or long-term.
10.b.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase
(short run). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet
which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This
source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. There will be
no long-term exposure of people to noise. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
16
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the following areas:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Lesi Than
Significant Unless Mitigation Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incomorated ImDact
11 .a. Fire protection? X
11 .b. Police protection? X
11 .c. Schools? X
11 .d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X.
11 .e. Other governmental services? X
No
Impact
Comments:
11.a,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or
police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection;
however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision from these entities. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.c.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school
facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of
Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. However, the
applicant will be required to pay all applicable school fees as a result of this development. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities, including
roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax that is distributed to the City
of Temecula from'the State of California. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads
as a result of development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be considered
significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses.
11 .e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doC
17
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS: Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
12.d.
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
issues and Supporting Infomletion Sources
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste disposal?
Local or regional water supplies?
Potentially
Potentiaily Significant Leg Than
Significant Unless Mitigation Significant
Impact IncorOorated Impact
X
No
'impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to power or
natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
12.c.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or
regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
12.d.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to sanitary
sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing
systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both
EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services
areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not
significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General
Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no septic tanks on site
or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.e.
The proposal will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to storm water drainage. The project will need to provide some additional on-site drainage
systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition of approval for the project and will tie into
the existing system. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal
systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through
participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or
regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
18
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Leg Than
Significant Unless Mitigation Significam
Issues and Sul)porting Information Sources Impact Incomrated I,mpaCt
13.a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X
13.b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect? X
13.c. Create light or glare? X
No
Comments:
13.a. The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in a area where
there is a scenic vista. Furlher, the City does not have any designated scenic highways. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. - -
13.b.
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The applicant and architect worked
with City staff to ensure a design that complies with the City-Wide Design Guidelines. The building is
designs are consistent with other designs in the area. The enhanced landscaping and additional
architectural treatments will provide additional aesthetic enhancement that will result in quality designed
homes. Therefore, no adverse visual impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c.
The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will produce and
result in a minimum amount of light or glare considering the scope of the project. However, all light and
glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory; therefore the project will be
conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With the
conditions of approval, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
19
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
14.a.
14.b.
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
I~sues and Supporting Information Sources
Disturb paleontological resources?
Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Figure 5-6)
Affect historical resources?
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
X
X
Leu Than
Significant
b~pact
X
X
No
Iml~act
X
Comments:
14.a,c.
The project may have a potentially significant impact on paleontological resources as the project is
located in an area of high sensitive paleontological resources (Figure 5-7 of the City's General Plan).
The project was reviewed by Eastern Information Center at University of Califomia, Riverside (UCR),
and the project will be conditioned to submit a cultural resource management report following
guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of
Historic Preservation. With the mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic
cultural values. A portion of the site was previously developed with a single family residence, but there
was no evidence of unique ethnic cultural values on site. The parcel is located in an area of high
sensitive paleontO_logical resources (Figure 5-7 of the City's General Plan) Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. No
religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
20
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
15.a.
15.b.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks
or other recreational facilities?
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Mitigation Significant No
Irrlpacl Incorporated ,linDact Impact
X
X
Comments:
15.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to
relocate within or to the City of Temecula. However, it will result in an incremental impact or in an
increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The same is true
for the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. The project is providing
two small park sites (including a swimming pool) on site to accommodate the immediate needs of the
residents. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING%397pa98eia..doc
21
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
16.a.
16.b.
16.c.
16.d.
issues and Supporting Information Sources
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community. reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Potentidly
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Than
sior~cant
No
X
X
X
Comments:
R :\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
22
17.
EARLIER ANALYSES. Eadier analyses may be used Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to
the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in
an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify
the following on attached sheets.
Earlier analyses used. Identify eadier analyses and state where they are available for review.
Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eadier analysis.
Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the
mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which
they address site-specific conditions for the project.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. City of Temecula Development Code
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
23
ATFACHMENT NO. 4
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:"~.aff~t~397&.398PC:(1~.~cvd)..dc~
27
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0397 (Change of Zone) and
PA No. 98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. Building
pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer,
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits,
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform Building
Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill.
Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Department of Public
Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc 25
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development
Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to the Planning
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and
the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact
adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been
incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading plans.
The applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan to the Department of
Public Works for approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact: -.
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall
be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc
TransgortationlCirculation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion and conflicts with adopted
policies supporting alternative transportation.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic
impacts.
Pay the appropriate fee in the amount in effect at the time of submittal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department of Public Works.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion and conflicts with adopted
policies supporting alternative transportation.
Condition the project to install bicycle lanes adjacent to Margarita Road as
part of the road improvements.
Submit road improvement plans that include the installation of the bicycle
lanes as approved by the Planning Commission.
Submit road improvement plans with grading plans.
Department of Public Works.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Condition the project to widen Margarita Road, adjacent to their project, to
the ultimate General Plan build-out.
Submit road improvement plans that comply with the approved site plan and
the General Plan Circulation Element.
Submit mad improvement plans with grading plans.
Department of Public Works.
R:\PLANNING%397pa98eia..doc 27
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Biological Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee.
Pay pro-rata share for traffic impacts (to be determined by the Director of
Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not
limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool).
The project will be conditioned to obtain project clearance and/or permits
from the Army Corps of Engineer and the State Department of Fish and
Game prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Submit proof of clearance and/or permits, and any mitigation measures
from the Army Corps of Engineer and the State Department of Fish and
Game.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia..doc 28
Fnergy and Mineral Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party
Affect upon energy conservation plans.
Compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation.
Submit energy calculations and pertinent data for review.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department
Noise
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Affect upon the future residents of the proposed units.
Implementation of the specific measures identified in the acoustical study to
comply with the General Plan noise level standards for residential units.
Submit an acoustical study illustrating the interior noise levels of the
residential units affected by future build-out traffic conditions, and implement
recommended noise reduction measures.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental services
regarding fire and police protection. The project will incrementally increase
the need for fire and police protection; however, it will contribute its fair
share to the maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Fire Mitigation Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Riverside County Fire Department.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department
R:\PLANNING\397pa98eia,.doc 29
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School District.
Pdor to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified School District.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities,
including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic impacts,
and public facilities.
Pay the appropriate fee in the amount in effect at the time of submittal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department of Public Works.
Aesthetics
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will be compatible with the existing area and not have a negative
aesthetic effect.
Compliance with the approved elevations, colors and materials.
Submit construction plans that are consistent with the approved elevations,
colors and materials.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, review plans for compliance with
Planning Commission approval.
Planning Department.
R:\PLANNING\3971}a98eia..doc 30
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
EXHIBITS
R:"4uffz'p~',,397~L398PC('Re. cvd)..dcx;
CITY OF TEMECULA
Moro(
~ood
SITE
Road
Vicini'l:y Map
n.t.s. '
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0397 and PA98-0398
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 2, 1998
VICINITY MAP
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~397&398PC..doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - H (High Density Residential)
BP
3
cc
BP
cc
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - H (High Density Residential)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0397 AND PA98-0398
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 2, 1998
R:\STAFFRPT\397&398PC..doc
it
3~Ifi.,L33JJH::)I:ff 3a'Y'~SONYI
0vOH
Z
i11
!
!i
T
:
T t
;1::
X
I.U
mmmt
-- J.
II
X
:z:
X
×
LLI
>C
/
.m
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Dove Homes-Tentative Tract No. 28810
Residential Planned Development Overlay
LOT DIMENSIONS
Miramum Lot Frontage at Front Property Line
Miramum Lot Frontage for a Flag Lot at Front Property Line
Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area
Minimum Average Width
Minimum Lot Depth
Minimum Net Lot Area
30 feet
12 feet
40 feet
40 feet
55 feet
2,700 sq. ft.
SETBACKS
Minimum Front Yard
Minimum Comer Side Yard
Minimum Interior Side Yard
Minimum Rear Yard
Minimum Distance Between Structures
8 feet
0 feet
0 feet
5 feet
3 feet
MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Maximum Height
Maximum % of Lot Coverage
Minimum Open Space per Unit
35 feet
50%
120 sq.ft.
Notes:
Variable Side Yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided
in a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side and a minimum of 3 feet
on the opposite side yard.
No encroachments shall be permitted within the 3-foot side yard setback area.
Accessory Structures: The location of accessory structures shall be located in
allowable buildable area as shown on the Exhibit entitled Planned Development Overlay.
Accessory structures shall maintain a minimum separation of three feet from all other
structures unless attached.
EXHIBIT G
DRIVE
/-.-ROLLED CURB /-, CURB CORE
///--4' SIDEWALK (AS SHOWN e RIGHT) DRAIN (TYP)
/
,' _.1.2.i '? 10'
ram. '~ i '- E
I m,n.
I rain,// . . I ,' ~ UNIT,
'
1 I ~2'
29.5 PE
I I 30.5 PE ':"
' " '-T · .
I BUII..I:)ABL~
I I' '1 ~lc~ I ~ ENVELOPE
· J J: 'L__ L __
i/
T
TYPICAL LOT
N .T,S.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 2, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
12
December 2, 1998 Planning Commission Minutes
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
Add the followin.~ conditional I~ermitted uses:
page 17, Animal hospital
page 19, Ca
(less than 5,000 square feet)
nded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:31 P.M.
6. Planning Al~plication No. PA98-0397 {Chanc~e of Zone) and PA98-03978 (Tentative Tract Map 28810)
Request to subdivide 7.31 acres into 78 single family detached dwellings and two open space/park lots
within a planned development overlay district.
RECOMMENDATION ~'/~11~~
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
Commissioner Webster advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda Item, and therefore left the
meeting at 7:31 P.M.
By way of color renderings, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (per agenda material), highlighting site
design, access, traffic, landscaping and architecture; commended the architect for his work on the project; advised that
a condition, with regard to the Change of Zone (as noted in the memorandum, dated December 2, 1998, per
supplemental agenda material) be added, ant that Condition No. 39, regarding submittal to the Fire Prevention Bureau,
be deleted.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, relayed his concurrence with staffs recommendation, regarding the
modification to the conditions; thanked staff for their work and efforts; for Commissioner Naggar, noted that the front
fencing (constructed of wood and three or four feet in height) reflected in the renderings is an architectural feature;
clarified that the proposed access will provide for adequate stacking; and, for Chairwoman Slaven, noted that the entry
will be gated, facilitating inaccessibility from the street.
Mr. Edc C. Curson, 29976 Via Puesta Del Sol, expressed concem with regard to the potential traffic, which could be
generated by the project.
Mr. Leon Lies, 29959 Via Puesta Del Sol, voiced his concems, as follows: safety, traffic, access with only one point of
entrance; with regard to construction, relayed concem with regard to traffic, noise, and open trenches; voiced disapproval
of the three existing power poles that are currently aboveground. Mr. Lies commended the reduction of units in the
proposed project.
Mr. Markham noted, for Mr. Lies, that the power poles will be installed underground.
Commissioner Naggar commended the architect for his work on the project, the reduction of units in the proposed plan,
and the clear and concise staff report facilitating a clear appraisal of the elevations.
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted, for Commissioner Guerdero, that this project will provide the raised median
on Margadta Road, facilitating safer traffic flow, noting that the provision for a designated U-turn will most likely be
installed at a signalized intersection; and noted that although Avenida Barca may be utilized for the movement, Mr.
Guerdero's concern with regard to the heavily impacted signalized intersection would be relayed.
Mr. Richard Kimball, representing the applicant, noted, for Commissioner Guerriero, that the stucco will maintain a semi-
smooth finish with added color, noting that he would submit samples of the stucco, with texture, presenting each house
color for the Commission's appraisal.
Ms. Anders advised that staff would ensure that the actual stucco would be consistent with the color renderings.
Chairwoman Slaven closed the public hearing at this time.
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified, for Chairwoman Slaven, that this project facilitates a reduction in the
traffic count with provision of road improvements on Margadta Road, as follows: a 110' foot right-of-way, two lanes, and
a parking lane.
Chairwoman Slaven, echoed by Commissioner Naggar, relayed her concem with regard to cut-throu h tr, i/~l~'1
adjacent neighborhoods without the designation of a U-turn movement at one of the left-rum pockets.
Chairwoman Slaven reopened the public hearing.
By way of overheads, Mr. Markham presented the access and circulation on the proposed site, specifying the left-tum
pocket at Avenida Del Sol, and the tum pocket at Avenida Sonoma, advising that the raised median will extend to Moraga
Road; clarified that the turn movement into the project was directed by staff, noting that they would cooperate with staffs
recommendation regarding access.
Chairwoman Slaven suggested continuing the project to the next Planning Commission Meeting in order for the
Commission to get clarification from staff on the designation of the U-turn movement.
With regard to traffic and circulation, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted, for Ms. Slaven, that the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission and a registered Traffic Engineer will review and address turning motions and the location of signals
when warranted, advising that it is in the City's best interest to maintain utilizing the expertise of the aforementioned
Commission and Traffic Engineer to appdse the circulation issues.
Chairwoman Slaven reiterated her concem with regard to the potential traffic problems generated by the project, advising
that she would not support the project without the provision of additional specific traffic information since the access of
this project would create the need for the U-turn movement.
Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the turning movement designation is a separate issue, advising that it would
not affect change in the design of this project.
Mr. Markham, and Mr. Parks allayed Chairwoman Slaven's concem with regard to the U-tum designation by clarifying
that a Uotum may be made at all left-turn pockets unless otherwise prohibited.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that the signals would be intemonnected.
Commissioner Naggar recommended the addition of signalized intersections, viewing Margadta Road as a potentially
major thoroughfare.
MOTION: Commissioner Gueniero moved to close the public headng; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning
Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810); and adopt the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA98-0397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map
28810); and adopt Resolution No. 98-047 recommending to the City Council approval of Planning Application No. PA98-
0397 (Zoning Amendment) and PA98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28810); based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report, public testimony received at the public headng, and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval, as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVES PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0398 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 28810) FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 7.31
ACRES INTO 78 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (INCLUDING PRODUCT REVIEW) AND TWO OPEN
SPACE/PARK LOTS WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 7. 31 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-370-004.
Modify
that the following condition be added, as follows: Tentative Map 28810 (PA No. 98-03398) is subject
to the approval and enforceable adoption of the Change of Zone (PA No. 98-0397). In the event that
the Change of Zone (PA No. 98-0397) does not occur, the approval of Tentative Map 28810 will
terminate without further action and will have no force and effect.
that Condition No. 39, regarding submittal to the Fire Prevention Bureau, be deleted.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception
of Commission Webster who abstained.
annin~ Application No. PA98-0323 (Tentative Tract Map 28510)
e 71.1 acres into 242 residential lots, 1 commercial lot and
1 park lot.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Delc
continue the request off calendar.
g Commission
Since it was noted that staff recommended continuing the matter off calendar, Mr. John
a public member who had requested to speak, noted that he was agreeable to coming back to
La Colima Road,
Commission
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doe
13
CHAPTER 17.06
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
SECTIONS:
17.06.010
17.06.020
17.06.030
17.06.040
17.06.050
17.06.060
17.06.070
Purpose and intent.
Description of residential districts.
Use regulations.
Development standards.
Special use standards and regulations.
Landscape standards.
Residential performance standards.
17.06.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
The following residential zoning districts are intended to provide regulations for the safe, efficient and
creative design of residential areas and other areas within the city. The zoning districts are intended to be
consistent with the land use designations that are described in the land use element of the Temecula general
plan. (Ord. 95-16 {} 2 (part))
17.06.020 DESCRIPTION OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.
Hillside Residential District (HR). The hillside residential zoning district is intended to provide for
the development of very low density residential uses. These areas include properties that have
severe constraints for development, such as hillside areas with slopes over twenty-five percent.
Typical lot sizes in the HR district are in excess of ten net acres.
Very Low Density Residential (VL). The very low density residential zoning district is intended to
provide for the development of single-family detached homes on large lots with a rural rancherie
character of development. Typical lot sizes are 2.5 to five net acres.
Low Density Residential (L-1 and L-2). The low density residential zoning district is intended to
provide for the development of single-family detached homes on larger lots with a custom character
of development. In order to provide for compatibility with existing and future areas, the low
density residential zoning district is further divided into the L-1 zoning district and the L-2 zoning
district. Typical lot sizes in the L-1 zoning district are 1.0 to 2.5 net acres: the L-2 zoning district
typically has lot sizes from .5 to 1.0 net acres.
Low Medium Density Residential (LM). The low medium density residential zoning district is
intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots of five thousand five
hundred square feet to ten thousand square feet of net lot area. Typical density for the low medium
density residential development is from three to six dwelling units per net acre, with a target
density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre.
Medium Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district is intended to
provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing
types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and patio homes.
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TEMI7 1.WPD 9/9/98 klb 3 5
High Density Residential (H) . The high density residential zoning district is intended to provide for
the development of attached residential developments. Typical housing types may include
townhouses, stacked dwellings and apartments. (Ord. 95-16 § 2 (part))
17.06.030 USE REGULATIONS.
The list of land uses on Table shall .be permitted in one or more of the residential zoning districts as
indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P"
the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-," the use is prohibited within the zone. A letter
"C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
Table
Residential Districts
Residential
Single-family detached P P P P P P
Duplex (two-family dwellings) 2 2 2 p p
Single-family attached (greater than two units) - - P P P
Multiple-family - - P P
Manufactured homes P P P P P P P
Mobilehome park C C C C C C C
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
handicapped, or dependent or neglected children (six
or fewer) P P P P P P P
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
handicapped, or dependent or neglected children
(seven to twelve) C C C C C P P
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment
facility (six or fewer) P P P P P P P
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment
facility (seven or more) C C C C C P P
Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or
fewer) P P P P P P P
Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or
more) C C C C C P P
Congregate care residential facilities for the
elderly P P P P
Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities - - C C
R:\DEVCODE\F!NAL\TEM17 1.WPD 9/9/98 klb 3 6
Description of Use
Secondary dwelling units
Granny Flat
Guest House
Family day care homes--small
Family day care homes--largeI
Day care centers
Bed and breakfast establishments
Emergency shelters
Transitional housing
Nonresidential
Agriculture/open space uses
Religious institutions
Public utility facilities
Educational institutions
Public libraries
Public museums and art galleries (not for profit)
Kennels and catteries
Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and
goats
Temporary real estate tract offices
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard3
Parking for commercial uses
Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls
Convalescent facilities
Golf courses
Home occupations
Construction Trailers s
Table
Residential Districts
HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H
P P P P P P P
p p p p p p4 ?
P P P P P P' ?
P P P P P P P
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C C C C P P
C C C C C P P
P P P P P P P
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C
C C ....
P P P P - _ _
P P P P P P P
- C C C C C C
_ _ _ p P
_ _ _ p P
_ _ _ p P
C C C C C C C
P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TEM17 1.WPD 9/9/98 klb 3 7
Table
Residential Districts
1. A CUP processed for large family day care homes is subject to Health and Safety Code Section
1597.46(a)(3). In accordance therewith, notice of the application being filed shall be mailed to
surrounding property owners within one hundred feet only and the notice shall indicate that unless a
request for a hearing is made by such surrounding property owner or other "affected person," the CUP
will issue within twenty days of the notice. If a hearing is requested, the planning department shall
schedule such hearing within thirty days of the request and the hearing shall be held within thirty days of
being scheduled.
2. A duplex or two-family dwelling may be permitted on corner lots with a planned development
overlay pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.22.
3. Subject to the provisions of Section 17.24.020(D)(2).
4. Allowed only with a single-family residence.
5. The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an
Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the construction trailer will not have an
adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses.
Legend P = Permitted by right in the district
C = Permitted by conditional use permit
- = Use is prohibited in the district
(Ord. 96-19 §{} 2(Y) and (Z); Ord. 95-16 § 2 (part); Ord 97-17 § 2 (part), {} 4(part); Ord. 98-02 § 2)
17.06.040 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
The development standards listed below are the minimum standards for development with the respective
zoning districts. It is intended that these standards will be met in addition to the residential performance
standards of Section 17.06.070. Considerations for approval of development plans and for awarding density
bonuses will be based upon both the development standards and the degree of conformance with the
performance standards. In the event of a conflict between the development standards and the performance
standards, the director of planning shall determine which requirement best implements the intent of the
development code.
Residential Development
Standards
Table 17.06.040
Development Standards--Residential Districts
Minimum net lot area (square feet)
Minimum average net lot area per
dwelling unit
Dwelling units per net acre'
HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H
400,000 100,000 40,000 20,000 7,200 7,200 7,200
7,200 3,600 2,400
10 acres 2.5 acres 1.0 acre .5 acre s.f. s.f. s.f.
0.1 0.3 1.0 2 4.5 12 20
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TEM17 1.WPD 9/9/98 k!b 3 8
Residential Development
Standards
LOT DIMENSIONS
Minimum lot frontage at front
property line
Minimum lot frontage for a flag lot
at front property line
Minimum width at required front
setback area
Minimum average width
Minimum lot depth
SETBACKS
Table 17.06.040
Development Standards--Residential Districts
HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H
50 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
40 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
100 ft. 100 ft. 70 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft.
100 ft. 80 ft. 70 ft. 60 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft.
150 ft. 120 ft. 100 ft. 90 ft. 80 ft. 100 ft. 100 ft.
25 ft.
Minimum front yard 40 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Avg.2
Minimum corner side yard 40 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft.
Minimum interior side yard 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
Minimum rear yard 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
Maximum height 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft.
Maximum percent of lot coverage 10 % 20 % 25 % 25 %
Open space required 90% 70% 60% 60%
Private open space/per unit NA NA NA NA
Notes:
20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
Av .2 Av .2
g g Ave.:
15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft.
Variable3 Variable3 Variable3
20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
35 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft.
35% 35% 30%
25 % 25 % 30 %
NA 200 150
1. Senior citizen housing or congregate care facilities: Permitted up to thirty DU/AC in the H
district. Eighteen DU/AC in the M district, and twelve DU/AC in the LM district.
2. Variable front yard setbacks: In order to allow for a more interesting visual image and more
flexible site planning variable setbacks may be permitted in the L2, LM, M and H districts. Front yard
setbacks shall have an average of at least twenty feet. Garages with entrances not facing the front yard
area may be setback a minimum of ten feet. Other portions of a structure may have a front yard setback
of a minimum of ten feet; however, the average setback of twenty feet shall be maintained.
3. Variable side yard setbacks: In the LM zoning district, the combined side yard setback for both
sides must equal at least fifteen feet with one side having at least ten feet to provide potential vehicular
access to the rear of the property and shall be located on the same side as the driveway. In the M and H
zoning districts, variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks
is not less than ten feet and the distance between adjacent structures is not less than ten feet. This
permits a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and ten feet on the opposite site
yard.
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TEM17 i.WPD 9/9/98 k!b 3 9
Table 17.22.116
Residential Districts
Description of Use
I
Multiple-family
Manufactured homes
Mobilehome park
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
children (six or fewer)
Facilities for the mentally disordered,
children (seven to twelve)
Residential
Single-family detached
Duplex (two-family dwellings)
Single-family attached (greater than two units)
handicapped, or dependent or neglected
handicapped, or dependent or neglected
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer)
Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or more)
Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer)
Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more)
Congregate care residential facilities for the Elderly
Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities
Secondary dwelling units
Granny Flat
Guest House
Family day care homes-small
Family day care homes-large
Day care centers
Bed and breakfast establishments
Emergency shelters
Transitional housing
Nonresidential
Agriculture/open space uses
Religious institutions
Public utility facilities
Educational institutions
Public libraries
Public museums and art galleries (not for profit)
Kennels and catteries
Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats
Temporary real estate tract offices
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRFF\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
14
PDO-2
F)1
131
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
p3
p3
P
P
C
C
P
P
P
C
P
Table 17.22.116
Residential Districts
Description of Use
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard
Parking for commercial uses
Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls
Convalescent facilities
Golf courses
Home occupations
Construction Trailers 4
1.
Legend
PDO-2
C2
Detached residential or zero lot-line units, duplexes and two-family dwellings are permitted
only with the approval of the Planning Commission.
Subject to the provisions of Section 17.24.020(D)(2).
Allowed only with a single-family residence.
The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an
Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the construction trailer will not
have an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses.
P = Permitted by right in the district
C = Permitted by conditional use permit
- = Use is prohibited in the district
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
15
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT\397pa98 cc staff report.doc
16
Z
I-- i
Z
<~
Z ~
I
L!J
X
UJ
i.
=r
X
LU
X
I
t
X
I--
X
w'
.<
LU
X
'7
,
X
z~
ZLr
-.-.?
-r
X
LU
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Dove Homes-Tentative Tract No. 28810
Residential Planned Development Overlay
LOT DIMENSIONS
Miramum Lot Frontage at Front Property Line
Miramum Lot Frontage for a Flag Lot at Front Property Line
Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area
Minsmum Average Width
Miramum Lot Depth
Miramum Net Lot Area
30 feet
12 feet
40 feet
40 feet
55 feet
2,700 sq. ft.
SETBACKS
Minimum Front Yard
Minimum Corner Side Yard
Minimum Interior Side Yard
Minimum Rear Yard
Minimum Distance Between Structures
8 feet
0 feet
0 feet
5 feet
3 feet
MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Maximum Height
Maximum % of Lot Coverage
Minimum Open Space per Unit
35 feet
50%
120 sq.ft.
Notes:
Variable Side Yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided
in a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side and a minimum of 3 feet
on the opposite side yard.
No encroachments shall be permitted within the 3-foot side yard setback area.
Accessory Structures: The location of accessory structures shall be located in
allowable buildable area as shown on the Exhibit entitled Planned Development Overlay.
Accessory structures shall maintain a minimum separation of three feet from all other
structures unless attached.
SEE A'rTACIHELO E×H B T G
EXHIBIT G
10'
I
1 112'
29.5 PE ~ '~ ~ 30.0 PE
J
DRIVE
ROLLED CURB
,//F 4° SIDEWALK (AS SHOWN 0 RIGHT)
/
CURB CORE
DRAIN CTYP)
2 min'4 ' t I~ ' / PAD: ELEVATION
'- ' 3
'S0.0 PE
TYPICAL LOT
2Jj 30.5 PE
I
BU~LD~3U~-
ENVELOPE
z
ITEM
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY MANAGER
c/
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
Gary Thornhi,l~COLom~unit Development Director
Y
January 12, 1999
Planning Application PA98-0318 and PA98-0449: (General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change) Corona Ranch
Prepared by: John De Gange, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA98-0318 AND
PA98-0449.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.'S 952-150- 001
AND 952-150-003)"
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.'S 952-150- 001 AND
952-150-003)"
BACKGROUND: This application was submitted to the City in July of 1998 by representatives
of the property owners James and Mary Corona. The purpose of the proposal is to address the
applicant's desire to obtain General Plan and zoning designations consistent with the land uses
that will ultimately be proposed within a future specific plan for these properties and an adjacent
parcel which is currently outside the City limits.
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
1
This item was noticed and heard at the November 4, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. At
that meeting the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC 98-038 (by a 3-0 vote)
recommending the approval of the General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. This
Resolution is contained in Attachment No. 3. The final Planning Commission Staff Report is
contained in Attachment No. 4 and a copy of the minutes from the November 4, 1998 Planning
Commission meeting are included in Attachment No. 5.
DISCUSSION: This application proposes to change the General Plan Land Use and Zoning
Map designations from Medium Density (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT) categories to Community Commercial (CC) to facilitate the
future development of a specific plan on the site and adjacent areas. The applicants have
indicated that they intend to prepare a specific plan on the property in question and the adjacent
property to the east to insure that the site is developed as a single unit.
It is staff's feeling that the change of the property currently designated Highway/Tourist
Commercial to Community Commercial is appropriate because both districts are similarly
compatible and that the Community Commercial is less intensive. It is also felt that the proposed
change of the residential parcel north of the property directly at the comer to Community
Commercial can also be considered appropriate, because when the residential and commercial
parcels are combined a more viable commercial site will be created. This is based on the fact
that both parcels are shallow in depth (approximately 350 feet). In addition, commercial uses in
this location are also compatible with the commercial and industrial zoning on two of the other
three comers of the intersection of 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. If approved, this
proposal would create a 19-acre commercially zoned parcel, approximately 1200 feet wide and
700 feet deep. A commercial site of this size is more able to support a viable commercial
project and would help avoid isolated fragmented development.
During the public hearing three members of the public spoke in opposition to the proposal. In
addition, a representative of the California Tradewinds Homeowner's Association submitted
petitions containing 87 signatures of opposition to the project. Prior to the Planning Commission
meeting, staff also received two telephone calls also opposing the application.
After a short discussion, the Planning Commission pointed out the merits of the proposal
indicating that a larger more viable commercial site would enhance the use that will eventually
occupy the site and provide needed commercial services to the surrounding properties.
Following their discussion, the Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 98-038 and
recommended that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
by a 3-0 vote (Commissioners Soltysiak and Naggar, absent).
FINDINGS:
Planning Application No.'s PA98o0318 and PA98-0449 (General Plan Amendment and
Change of Zone) as proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
The project is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. A portion of the site is
already zoned for commercial uses and is already being partially used for commercial
purposes.
The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it
remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98.CC.doc
2
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An initial environmental study was performed for this
project which determined that the proposal could potentially affect geology, water,
transportation/circulation, aesthetic, and cultural resources. The study was prepared for a non-
detailed general plan amendment and zone change because no detailed development
proposals have been submitted to the City. Section 15146 of the CEQA Guidelines states that
the specificity and detail of environmental analysis should be similar to the detail and specificity
of the project. Since the project is a general plan amendment/zone change, only a general plan
level of evaluation is possible. However, in an effort to provide as much information as possible,
some additional evaluation has been provided. Any mitigation measures identified in this
document will be implemented when detailed development proposals are available.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is not
expected to add any significant operating costs to the City of Temecula.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Resolution No. 99- - Page 4
Ordinance No. 99- - Page 7
Planning Commission Resolution PC98-038 - Page 11
November 4, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 12
Planning Commission Minutes - Page 13
Initial Environmental Study- Page 14
Exhibits - Page 15
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .CC~doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .CC .doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 952-150-
001 AND 952-150-003)
WHEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term General Plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan.
WHEREAS, Sections 65350 of the Government Code permits a city to amend the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to accurately
reflect private property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearing on November 4,
1998, with numerous continuances, and recommended that the City Council approve the
attached amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby
amends the General Plan Land Use Designations for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-001 from Medium Density Residential
(M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community Commercial (CC).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-003 from Highway Tourist Commercial
(HT), to Community Commercial (CC).
Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc 5
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
of the
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
,1999 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC .doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFR PT\318PA98 .CC.doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.'S 952-150- 001
AND 952-150-003) CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION(S) FROM HIGHWAY/ TOURIST
COMMERCIAL (HT), MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M),
AND LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LM), TO
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private
property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November
4, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City
Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zonin.q Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-001: change the Zoning designation
from Medium Density Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community
Commercial (CC).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-003: change the Zoning Designation
from Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT) to Community Commercial (CC).
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98 .CC.doc
8
Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .CC.doc
9
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
__th day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC98-038
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-
150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION PA98-0318)"
AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, NORTHEAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 AND
(SOUTH)
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNII~)~t~'
APPLICATION NO.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-0449)"
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be
consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, that this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol
Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on November 4, 1998, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND
952-150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION PA98-0318)" AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.'s PA98-0318 AND
PA98-0449)" SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORMS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION
AS EXHIBITS A AND B, RESPECTIVELY.
R:~staffrpt~l 8PA98.PC.doc
5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of November,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Slaven, Webster
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Naggar, Soltysiak
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:LstaffrptL31 8PA98.PC.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT- NOVEMBER 4, 1998
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
12
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 4, 1998
Planning Application No.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-0449
(General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Prepared By: John De Gange, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-0449;
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending approval of
Planning Application No.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-0449 based
upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff
Report; and
=
APPROVE Planning Application No.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-
0449.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
James and Mary Corona
PROPOSALS:
To amend the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map for
the site from Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), Medium Density
Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to
Community Commercial, in accordance with Exhibit A (for the
General Plan Land Use Map) and Exhibit B (for the Zoning Map);
LOCATION:
Northeast of the intersection of Highway 79 South and Butterfield
Stage Road (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 952-150- 001 and 952-
150-003)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Medium and Low-Medium Density Residential
Neighborhood Commercial
Riverside County - Residential (2-4 du/ac)
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan - Residential
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
R :\STAFFRPT\318PA98. PC .doc
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant and agricultural uses
PROJECT STATISTICS
Parcels:
Total Area:
952-150-001 (9.56 acres) and 952-150-003 (9.61 acres)
19.17 acres
BACKGROUND
On July 23, 1998 an application requesting a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from
Medium and Low Medium Density Residential to Highway/Tourist Commercial for Assessor Parcel
Number 952-150-001 was received. After meeting with the applicant and their representative, staff
was informed that their ultimate goal is to process a specific plan on the parcel in question and the
adjacent parcel (Parcel Number 952-150-003). The applicant's goal in this application is to obtain
General Plan and zoning designations that will be consistent with the land uses they will ultimately
propose in their spedtic plan. The applicant has revised their application to include the other parcel
they intend to place within the specific plan area and modified the proposed designation from
Highway/Tourist Commercial to Community Commercial.
ANALYSIS
The proposal would change the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map designations from
Medium Density and Low Medium Density Residential and Highway/Tourist Commercial to
Community Commercial to facilitate the future development of a specific plan on the site. Staff
feels that the change from Highway/Tourist Commercial to Community Commercial is appropriate
because both districts are compatible with each other and Community Commercial is considered
a less intensive use in comparison with Highway/Tourist Commerdal. The Community Commercial
designation is also compatible with the commercial and light industrial properties on two of the
other three corners at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road.
Staff also feels that changing the residential parcel north of the property directly at the corner to
Community Commercial is also appropriate. This is because the two parcels, when combined,
would create a more viable commercial site. The basis for this opinion is that both parcels are
shallow in depth, (approximately 350 feet), although wide along the portion of the lot that faces
Highway 79(S) (approximately 1200 feet). Given the importance of the intersection of Highway 79
South and Butterfield Stage Road, a parcel only 350 feet deep would realistically not be capable
of supporting any kind of substantial commercial development, particularly of the scale of
Highway/Tourist Commercial. If approved, this proposal will create a 19-acre commercially zoned
parcel, which is approximately 1200 feet wide and 700 feet deep. A commercial site of this size
is more able to support a viable commercial project and would help avoid isolated fragmented
development.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An initial environmental study was performed for this project which determined that the proposal
could potentially affect geology, water, transportation/circulation, aesthetic, and cultural resources.
The study was prepared for a non-detailed general plan amendment and zone change because
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
no detailed development proposals have been submitted to the City. Section 15146 of the CEQA
Guidelines states that the specificity and detail of environmental analysis should be similar to the
detail and specificity of the project. Since the project is a general plan amendment/zone change,
only a general plan level of evaluation is possible. However, in an effort to provide as much
information as possible, some additional evaluation has been provided. Any mitigation measures
identified in this document will be implemented when detailed development proposals are available.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Staff has evaluated this proposal and has determined that the requested amendment to the
General Plan land use and zoning designations are appropriate and will allow the property owners
to reasonably and appropriately develop this site in a manner compatible with the surrounding area.
FINDINGS
Planning Application No.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-0449 (General Plan Amendment and
Change of Zone) as proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
The project is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. A portion of the site is already
zoned for commercial uses and is already being partially used for commercial purposes.
The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
Attachments:
PC Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 4
Exhibit A - Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 7
Exhibit B - Ordinance No. 98- - Blue Page 10
Initial Study- Blue Page 14
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 30
Exhibits - Blue Page 36
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Proposed Project Zoning
R :\STAFFRPT\318PA98. PC .doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
952-150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION PA98-
0318)" AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-
150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.'s PA98-0318 and PA98-
0449)"
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, that this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, a public headng was conducted on November 4, 1998, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79
(SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
952-150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION PA98-0318)" AND ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, NORTHEAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-150-003 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO.'s PA98-0318 AND PA98-0449)" SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORMS THAT
ARE AftACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBITS A AND B, RESPECTIVELY.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .PC.doc
5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of November,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98,PC.doc
6
L
oop'Od'86Vd8 lg\ldI::I::I-IVIS\:IJ
'86 'ON NOI/l'lqOS'qld .L.-IVldQ
V~IEIHX9
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH)
AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-150-003
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO.'S PA98-0318 PA98-0449)
WHEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well as
any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning; and
WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan.
WHEREAS, Sections 65350 of the Govemment Code permits a city to amend the general
plan; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to accurately reflect
private property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public headng on November 4,
1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the General
Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on
to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
__,1998
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USF MAP The City Council
hereby amends the General Plan Land Use Designations on the following parcels as specified
below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-001: change the Land Use Designation
from Medium Density (M) Residential and Low Medium Density (LM) Residential to Community
Commercial (CC).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-003, change the Land Use Designation
from Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT) to Community Commercial (CC).
Section 2. ENVIRONMFNTAL REVIEW The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the proposal could potentially affect geology,
water, transportation/circulation, aesthetic, and cultural resources. The study was prepared for a
non-detailed general plan amendment and zone change because no detailed development
proposals have been submitted to the City. Section 15146 of the CEQA Guidelines states that the
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
8
speci~city and detail of environmental analysis should be similar to the detail and sped~city of the
project. Since the project is a general plan amendment/zone change, only a general plan level of
evaluation is possible. However, in an effort to provide as much information as possible, some
additional evaluation has been provided. Any mitigation measures identified in this document will
be implemented when detailed development proposals are available.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __th day of
,1998.
A'I'FEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
of the
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
,1998 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98,PC.doc
9
EXHIBIT B
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
10
EXHIBIT B
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-
150-003 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.'S PA98-0318 AND PA98-
0449)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect pdvate property
and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public headng on November 4,
1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City
Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, that this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
__,1998
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING MAP The City Council hereby amends
the Zoning Map for the City of Temecula for as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-001: change the Zoning Designation from
Medium Density Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community
Commercial (CC) as shown on Exhibit A.
B. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-003, change the Zoning Designation from
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT) to Community Commercial (CC) as shown on Exhibit A.
R :\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98. PC .doc
11
Section 2. FNVIRONMFNTAL RFVII=W The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the proposal could potentially affect geology,
water, transportation/circulation, aesthetic, and cultural resources. The study was prepared for a
non-detailed general plan amendment and zone change because no detailed development
proposals have been submitted to the City. Section 15146 of the CEQA Guidelines states that the
speci~city and detail of environmental analysis should be similar to the detail and speci~city of the
project. Since the project is a general plan amendment/zone change, only a general plan level of
evaluation is possible. However, in an effort to provide as much information as possible, some
additional evaluation has been provided. Any mitigation measures identified in this document will
be implemented when detailed development proposals are available.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in
the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days
from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together
with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same
in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
12
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __day of ,1998.
A'I'I'EST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
of the
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
,1998 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
13
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .PC.doc
14
Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation (Current)
Zoning (Current)
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Planning Application No. PA98-0318 (General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
John De Gange
(909) 694-6400
Located on northeast of the intersection of Highway 79 (S)
and Butterfield Stage Road (Assessor's Parcel Numbers
952-150- 001 and 003)
James and Mary Corona, 33320 Highway 79 South,
Temecula, CA 92592
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), Medium Density
Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM)
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), Medium Density
Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM)
A request to change the General Plan Land Use
designations of two parcels from Highway/Tourist
Commercial (HTC), Medium Density Residential (M), and
Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community
Commercial (CC)
The project is surrounded by the Paloma del Sol/Paseo
Del Sol Specific Plan to the west, the Vail Ranch and
Redhawk Specific Plans to the South, the unincorporated
Wine Country to the east, and the Crown Hills are to the
north.
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County
Health Department, Temecula Police Department, Eastern
Municipal Water District, Rancho California Water District,
Southern California Gas Company, Southern California
Edison Company, General Telephone Company, and
Riverside Transit Agency
R:\STAFFRPT~318PA98. PC .doc
15
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
X
X
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
X
X
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least
one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have
been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that
are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signature
Date: October 16, 1998
John De Gange
For: The City of Temecula
R :\STAFFRPT\318PA98. PC .doc
16
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
PotenUally
Signfficant
Impact
Potenlially
Significant
Unless
Mitiga~ort
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
1.a.
1.c.
1.d.
1.e.
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or minority
community)?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments
1.a., c.
1.d
1.e.
The project is a general plan amendment and zone change from existing Highway/Tourist,
Medium Density Residential and Low Medium Density Residential to Community Commercial.
The environmental impact of the proposed general plan amendment and proposed zone
change is expected to be less than significant because Community Commercial is compatible
with Highway/Tourist Commercial and is a less intensive use. Community Commercial is also
compatible the other adjacent commercial designations in the vicinity. The widening of the
commercial designation to include the residential parcel to the north is logical in that it creates a
more viable commercial site by increasing the site from 9.5 acres to 19 acres. This will assist
in averting isolated fragmented development. As a consequence the environmental impact
associated with this project is expected to be less than significant.
This site as well as adjacent properties to the north and south are located in areas identified as
Farmland of Local Importance. Currently isolated farming does occur in and around the site;
however, these areas are not within areas under Williamson Act contract. The City of
Temecula General Plan has anticipated that this property will ultimately be developed with uses
other than agriculture and would consequently no longer be utilized for agricultural production.
As a consequence any environmental impacts associated with this project is expected to be
less than significant.
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minority community). There is no established residential community
(including low-income or minority community) at this site. Furthermore, the site is a vacant,
and the reduction in the amount of residentially zoned property being proposed in this project
will be minor. As a consequence no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
e
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population Projects? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
17
I IIx
2.b.
2.c.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Potenlially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Signfficant Mitigalion Signfficant
Impact Incorporated Impact
No
Impa~
X
X
Comments
2.a.
2.b.
2.c.
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The
project will ultimately result in the construction of community commercial facilities Since the
project is intended to ultimately serve the needs of the existing residents, the proposed
development will not be a significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively
exceed official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated as
a result of this project.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project
will not likely cause people to relocate to or within Temecula, but will the uses which will
ultimately be constructed on the site will serve the needs of existing residents. Therefore, the
project will not induce substantial growth in the area, and no significant effects are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The project will not displace any type of housing. The project site is vacant with proposed
zoning, which is commercial, and as a consequence no housing will be displaced. No
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving?
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6 )
Seismic ground shaking?
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (Source 1,
Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
Landslides or mudflows? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-
8)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions form excavation, grading or fill?
Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-
8)
Expansive soils?
Unique geologic or physical features?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
18
Comments
3.a. ,b. ,c.,e.,f
4. WATER.
4.a.
4.b.
4.c.
4.d.
4.e.
4.g.
4.h,
4.i.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Stgnfficant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
The ultimate development of the site may have a significant impact on people involving
seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (including liquifaction), erosion, changes in
topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils.
The site is located in Southern California, an area that is seismically active. The City's
General Plan identifies two active faults in the vicinity, the Wildomar Fault and the Wolf Valley
Fault.
Potential impacts will be mitigated by compliance with State of California Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone development criteria and construction in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code standards. A soils report shall be required as part of the development and shall
contained recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any
potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (including
liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill and expansive soils. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition
of approval for development projects at the site. Potential unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper
compaction of the soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project..
Would the proposal result in:
Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate
and mount of surface runoff?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3, Page 7-10 and
Figure 7-4, Page 7-12)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity)?
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater.
Otherwise available for public water supplies?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R :\STAFFRPT\318PA98. PC .doc
19
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Signfficant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Inco~l~d Impacl Impact
Comments
4.a.
4.b.
4.c.
4.d. ,e.
4.f.-h.
4.i.
Development of the site may result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns and the
rate and amount of surface runoff should development occur as a result of the land use
designation and zone change. However, because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water
course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited. The impact as a result of the
change in land use designations is considered to be less than significant.
This project falls within Zone X of the Temecula Creek floodplain (areas within the 500-year
floodplain) as identified by Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel No. 060742-0005-B (November
20, 1996). If a property is located in Zone X no mitigation is required and as consequence a
less than significant impact is expected.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and
alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the
developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is
shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can
be mitigated to a level less than significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant impact in
changes to the amount of surface water in any water body or impact currents, or impact the
course or direction of water movements. Because of the restrictive easements, fault line,
water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited. The impact as a result
of the change in land use designations is considered less than significant.
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant change in the
quantity and quality of ground waters. Because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water
course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited. The impact as a result of the
change in land use designations is considered less than significant.
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant impact in the
reduction in the amount of ground water otherwise available for public water supplies. Because
of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated
to be limited. The impact as a result of the change in land use designations is considered less
than significant.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.a.
5.b.
5.c.
5.d.
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (Source 1,
Page 2-29)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors?
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
20
Issues and Suppoffing Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Miligatioo Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Comments
'5.a
5.b.,d.
5.c.
The proposed change in land use designation will not violate any air quality standard or
contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Because of the restrictive
easements, fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited
and well below target floor area ratios of any commercial zone. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no sensitive receptors
in proximity to the project. According to the City's Development Code, standards with regards
to the generation of particulate matter, smoke, dust, dirt, ash, odors, toxics and other noxious
matter apply equally to all commercial zones.
The proposed change in land use designation will not alter air movement, moisture or
temperature, or cause any change in climate. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
6.a.
6.c.
6.d.
6.e.
6.f.
6.g.
Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible
uses)?
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
6,a.
The proposal is located in an area where current conditions are such that the road system
experiences occasional traffic congestion at peak times. To address these conditions the City
of Temecula, CALTRANS and the County of Riverside have several regional circulation
improvement projects proposed. In some cases these projects are currently under
construction. Area traffic congestion is expected to significantly improve when these scheduled
improvements have been completed. This proposal would shift the General Plan and Zoning
designations from one commercial designation to another and a portion of the site from
residential to commercial. It is anticipated; however, that because of the limited nature of future
development, most sites are significantly constrained with utility easements and environmental
site limitations, that a less than significant impact upon traffic is anticipated. The project will
have a less than significant impact upon increased vehicle tdps or traffic congestion.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
21
6.d.
Signfficant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Inoofpofamd Impact Impact
Future development will be conditioned to provide sufficient parking capacity in accordance
with the City's Development Code. With proper mitigation measures, future development is
anticipated to cause a less than significant impacts as a result of this project.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
7.a.
7.b.
7.c.
7.d.
7.e.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)? (Source 4)
Locally designated species (e.g.heritage trees)?
(Source 4)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
X
X
X
Comments:
7.a. ,b.
7.c.d.,e.
The project site for the proposed change in land use lies within in an area designated by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as potential habitat for the Federally listed endangered species
the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. This proposal does not actually represent a development
proposal. However, any future development of the site, as with any development projects
which fall within this boundary, will be required to conduct a biological survey to determine if the
vegetational association best suited for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly is present and if the
organism is an actual inhabitant of the property. A Mitigation measure, requiring the applicant
of a development proposal on this property to conduct a biological survey of the property prior
to the approval of any development proposal, has been included. A biological survey of the
property shall include appropriate mitigation measures for the development of this property.
With proper mitigation measures, future development is anticipated to cause a less than
significant impacts as a result of this project.
The project site is currently disturbed and largely undeveloped. There are no locally
designated communities, wetland habitat areas, or wildlife corridors on or around the site.
Future development proposals for this site will receive appropriately detailed environmental
review. As a result, no impacts are anticipated at this time.
8.a.
8.b.
8.c.
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
22
X
X
X
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
the residents of the State?
Potenlially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
I I I
Comments:
8.8.
8.b.
8.c.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project
will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation
during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be
consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources
in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials,
fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-
renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts
are not seen as significant.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of
future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project
site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.a.
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemical or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
9.8.
The project will not result in a significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the release of any
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed
in the request. While some retail uses may have the potential to sell hazardous substances,
they are regulated by both the Fire Department and the Department of Environmental Health.
Future development must receive clearance from the Department of Environmental Health prior
to any plan check submittal. Future development must receive clearance from the Fire
Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. This applies to storage and use of
hazardous materials. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
23
9.b.
g.c.
9.d.
9.e.
10. NOISE.
10.a.
10.b.
Comments:
10.a.
10.b.
Potenlja!ly
Signfficant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signfficant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impac~ Impact
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation
plan. The subject site is not located in an area, which could impact an emergency response
plan. The project will take access from maintained streets and will therefore not impede any
emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check
stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these
applicable laws. Reference response 9.a. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health
hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush, grass,
or trees. The project is in an area of existing uses and proposed commercial uses. The project
is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Would the proposal result in:
Increase in existing noise levels? (Source 1, page 8-
9)
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X
X
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is
vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during
construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. However, the
project site is adjacent to State Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road which are both
designated as access restricted six-lane urban arterial roadways. Ambient noise levels 100
feet from centerline are 70.2 to 75.2 CNEL for Highway 79 South and range within 65 CNEL for
Butterfield Stage Road. According to the City's General Plan, it is appropriate to place
insensitive land uses such as commercial adjacent to noise generators such as highways.
Long-term noise generated by this project would be similar to existing and proposed uses in the
area. Noise impacts are anticipated to be less than significant as a result of this project in
either the shod or long-term.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase (shod run). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+
DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause headng damage from
steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of shod duration and therefore will not be
considered significant. There will be no long-term exposure of people to noise. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98,PC.doc
24
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potenlially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Miligation
Incorporated
Less Than
Signfficant
Impact
No
Impact
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
11.a.
11.b.
11.c.
11.d.
11.e.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
11.a.,b.
11.c.
11.d.
11.e.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered
fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police
protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the cost of maintenance of service
provision from these entities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered
school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to
the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities,
including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax, which is
distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and future
needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be incremental,
however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of
the proposed expenses.
The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS: Would the proposal
result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
12.d.
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste disposal?
Local or regional water supplies?
Comments:
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98.PC.doc
25
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
12.d.
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Signfficant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
communication systems (reference response No. 12.a. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon
existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan
states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is
required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the
proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." It is
anticipated that the proposal to change the designation from Office to Commercial, and the
limited nature of future development under this designation, would not significantly increase the
demand for systems or supplies. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Future development may require additional storm water drainage facilities onsite. However,
because this project is a change in General Plan and Zoning designations from one commercial
category to another, no specific development proposals are being proposed at this time. Any
specific development proposal would receive an appropriately detailed environmental review.
No significant impacts are anticipated at this time.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste
disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be
mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are
implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
13.a.
13.b.
13.c.
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect?
Create light or glare?
X
X
X
Comments:
13.a.
The City does not have any designated scenic highways. However, future developments on
the site will be reviewed to ensure that project design provides appropriate aesthetic benefits in
accordance with the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
26
13.b.
13.c.
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Suppo~ng Information Sources Signfficant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project, as proposed, is
intended to encourage neighborhood commercial uses and appearance along Pala Road, and
would locate more intense service commercial uses on the interior portion of the site. It is
anticipated that this layout will require a more neighborhood character in terms of building scale
and design and in terms of landscaping adjacent to Pala Road to make future development
more compatible with the surrounding area. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated.
The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will
produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new light sources.
All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. Future
development will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance
Regulating Light Pollution). With mitigation measures no significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
14.a.
14.b.
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 2, Figure
55 )
Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Page
281)
Affect historical resources? ( )
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( )
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ( )
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
14.b.
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
The General Plan identifies a sensitive archaeological area at the intersection of State Highway
79 South and Butterfield Stage Road, which may extend to the subject site. Due to the
potential for deposits in the area, future development of the proposed site will be required to
conduct a Phase I archeological investigation on site prior to the approval any development
project. The potential for future significant impacts will be determined and fully mitigated when
future development proposals are considered.
There are no known historical resources on site, which the project would impact. As a
consequence no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change affecting unique ethnic
cultural values. Reference response 14.b,c. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
As a consequence no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
15. RECREATION.
15.a.
Would the proposal:
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
27
X
15.b.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
PotenMally
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Signfficant Mitigation Signfficant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
I I x
Comments:
15.a.,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of
people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula. The same is true for the quality or quantity
of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
16.a.
16.b.
16.c.
16.d.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
Comments:
EARLIER ANALYSES. None
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
28
SOURCES
2.
3.
4.
City of Temecula General Plan·
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Habitat Map (compiled by
the Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency [TLMA] GIS
Division - dated June 4, 1998)
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
29
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
30
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA98-0318 (General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to fault rupture, seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or
eadhquake hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to fault rupture, seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or
earthquake hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact
adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been
incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
31
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
Transportation/Circulation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic
impacts.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for traffic signal mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site.
Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use.
Install on-site parking spaces.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works, Planning Department and Building & Safety
Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98,PC.doc
32
Biological Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat
habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Requirement of biologic survey at the time of the submittal of a
development proposal for the site.
At the time of the submittal of a development proposal on the project site
the applicant shall submit a biological survey at the appropriate time of
the year to determine if the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly or any other
endangered or threatened species are present on site. This biological
survey shall propose appropriate mitigation for development of the site.
Upon submittal of a development proposal.
Planning Department
Energy and Mineral Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Affect upon energy conservation plans.
Compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation.
Submit energy calculations and pertinent data for review.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98,PC.doc
33
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental
services regarding fire protection. The project will incrementally increase
the need for fire protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the
maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for Fire Mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities,
including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic
impacts, and public facilities.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
34
AESTHETICS
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare
that could affect the Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655.
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect.
Ensure architectural and design compatibility with existing structures.
Submit architectural plans that conform with the existing development in
terms of design, style, materials and colors.
Prior to scheduling for public hearing.
Planning Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC.doc
35
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT\318PA98.PC,doc
36
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
CREEK
pAL4
pROJECT
EMECULA,,,'
/
///
/
/
\
/1
CASE NUMBER: PA98-0318 and PA98-0449
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1998
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
P
L
VL
VL
OS
BP
LM
os c
os p } VL
VL
L
L
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
CASE NUMBER: PA98-0318 and PA98-0449
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NUMBER: PA98-0318 and PA98-0449
EXHIBIT - D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - NOVEMBER 4, 1998
PROPOSED PROJECT ZONING
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
NOVEMBER 4, 1997 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\3 18PA98.CC.doc
13
*2nd tree (Eucalyptus) the next marked tree on the legend, moving toward Ranch~
not be removed
a Road,
*3rd tree (Sycamore) the following marked tree on the legend,
Road, be removed due to the 36" boxed Atlas Cedar tree located
Rancho California
ea
*4th tree (Magnolia) be removed due to the location
*5th and 6th trees (2 Purple Plums) be removed,
place of the Podocarpus trees.
on the back street (entry road) in
*7th tree (Bottle Tree) located beneath the
tree, on the corner alcove, be removed
*8th, 9th and 10th trees (London Plane
remaining London Plane Trees in th~
~n the left side of the legend, be removed, leaving 3
'1 lth, 12th, and 13th trees (1 and 2 Purple Plums) on the bottom of the legend, in the
alcove, remove the Aleppo relocate the Purple Plums in the parking lot a~ additional
color
The applicant was ~le to the Commission's recommendations. ~1~t
3. Directc arin.~ Update
This Ac
was heard out of order, see page 2.
~lannin~3 Application No. PA95-0079 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28257)
s Agenda Item was heard out of order, see page 3.
5. Planning Application No. PA98-0318 (General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Request to change the General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations of two parcels
from Highway/Tourist Commercial (HTC), Medium Density Residential (M), and Low
Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community Commercial (CC).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve
the request.
Project Planner DeGange presented the staff report (of record), noting that the applicant is
requesting a zone change to Community Commercial (CC) creating a 19-acre commercially zoned
parcel; clarified that the current zoning is Highway/Tourist Commercial (HTC), Medium Density
Residential (M), and Low Medium Density Residential (LM); advised that after evaluation, staff would
recommend the approval of the request due to the proposed zoning facilitating a more viable
commercial project rather than an isolated fragmented development; and noted, for Commissioner
Webster, that page 2 of the Environmental Checklist (per agenda material) will be modified to not
reflect Land Use Planning, Noise, and Water as having a "Potentially Significant Impact."
Mr. Harold Carter, 33552 Corte Bonilla, requested clarification on the difference between
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Community Commercial (CC); and noted his primary
concern was the potential of additional generation of traffic due to the zone change.
Further elaborating on Mr. Carter's request, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the zoning
change to Community Commercial (CC) would permit less intense commercial uses than what would
be presently permitted on the front portion of the property specifying that the permitted uses are
similar in nature, but fewer are permitted in Community Commercial (CC); and noted that any project
proposed on this parcel would come back to the Planning Commission for review and public input.
Mr. James Harris, 33305 Corte Yaca, representing the California Tradewinds Homeowner's
Association, expressed opposition to the zoning change due to the following concerns: the close
proximity of school bus stops and neighboring homes, traffic, lighting, and the view lots overlooking
Corona Ranch which would be negatively affected with lower property values and st~;a~rds of living
by a commercial site. ~
Mr. Jim Beaver, 43384 Via Angeles, opposed any zone change which would increase ~
uses in this area above what is currently permitted.
Five petitions (totaling 87 signatures) were submitted in opposition to the zone change, and staff
received two phone calls, both opposing the rezoning of the Corona Ranch.
Commissioner Webster, echoed by Commissioner Guerriero, viewed the proposal as an
enhancement of the use, and the surrounding property; and invited concerned public members to
visit the Planning Department to view the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines.
Chairwoman Slaven viewed the change to Community Commercial (CC) as a positive change due
to the parcel not being segmented.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative
Declaration for Planning Application Nos. PA98-0318 and PA98-0449; adopt Resolution No. 98-038
recommending approval of Planning Application Nos. PA98-0318 and PA98-0449 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and approve Planning Application No.'s PA98-
1318 and PA98-0449.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND 952-150-003
(PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA98-0318 AND PA98-0449)
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Commissioners Soltysiak and Naggar who were absent.
6. Plannin.Q Application No. PA98-0302 (Development Plan)
Request to construct a 13,112 square foot industrial (tilt-up
acre lot.
building on a .86
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department tha'
the request.
e Planning Commission approve
By way
noting that 29% of the site has been landscaped,
commended the architect and the applicant for
concerns due to the site being a comer lot; clarified.
with the Sign Ordinance, this project will require
for Chairwoman Slaven, the location of the rol
the top of the building.
of overheads, Project Planner Thornsley prese~ the staff report (per agenda material),
includes screening the parking area;
diligently with the City, addressing staff's
' Commissioner Webster, that in accordance
a sign program; and noted on the renderings,
and the brick (maroon) color band across
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks cb ed Condition No. 50 (of record), for
Webster, regarding road improvements follows: that on Diaz Road, the improv~
encompass a sidewalk; on Rancho Way, idewalk; and further clarified that Section d. of Cot
No. 50 will require the installation of a ed landscape on Diaz Road as part of the General Pla
for future installment; and noted, in re to the future bridge project, possibly at Rancho Way, that
this development's effect or~ the sed bridge wouldn't be taken into consideration due to the
project being so long range into th ~ture.
For Commissioner Guerriero,
traffic on Diaz Road for future
Director of Public Works Parks noted that staff would examine
id improvements.
Mr. Richard Alvarez, rep
elevations have been
projects in the area the
.~nting the applicant, clarified, for Commissioner Webster, that the
to comply with flood mitigation; and noted, for the Commission, other
ave developed.
Commissioner Web,, commended the applicant on the variety of trees used in the landscaping.
MOTION: Comr sioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative
Declaration for ~ning Application No. PA98-0302; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for
Planning Appl lion No. PA98-0302; and adopt Resolution No. 98-039 approving Planning
Application Nc based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to th onditions of Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-039
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0302 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,112 SQUARE FOOT
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
14
Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsors Name and Address
General Plan Designation (Current)
Zoning (Current)
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Planning Application No. PA98-0318 (General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
John De Gange
(909) 694-6400
Located on northeast of the intersection of Highway 79 (S)
and Butterfield Stage Road (Assessor's Parcel Numbers
952-150- 001 and 003)
James and Mary Corona, 33320 Highway 79 South,
Temecula, CA 92592
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), Medium Density
Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM)
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), Medium Density
Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM)
A request to change the General Plan Land Use
designations of two parcels from Highway/Tourist
Commercial (HTC), Medium Density Residential (M), and
Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community
Commercial (CC)
The project is surrounded by the Paloma del Sol/Paseo
Del Sol Specific Plan to the west, the Vail Ranch and
Redhawk Specific Plans to the South, the unincorporated
Wine Country to the east, and the Crown Hills are to the
north.
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County
Health Department, Temecula Police Department, Eastern
Municipal Water District, Rancho California Water District,
Southern California Gas Company, Southern California
Edison Company, General Telephone Company, and
Riverside Transit Agency
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~318PA98.1ES Final-modified
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
X
X
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
X
X
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have
been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that
are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signature
Date: October 16, 1998
John De Gange
For: The City of Temecula
R:\PLANNING\CEQAL318PA98.1ES Final-modified
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Poientially
Significanl
Unless
Mitigation
j__!_nc. orporaled
Less Ttlarl
Significanl
Impact
No
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
1.a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
1 .b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
1 .c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
1.d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page
5-17)
1.e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or
minority community)?
X
×
X
X
Comments
1 .a., The project is a general plan amendment and zone change from existing Highway/Tourist,
c. Medium Density Residential and Low Medium Density Residential to Community Commercial.
The environmental impact of the proposed general plan amendment and proposed zone change
is expected to be less than significant because Community Commercial is compatible with
Highway/Tourist Commercial and is a less intensive use. Community Commercial is also
compatible the other adjacent commercial designations in the vicinity. The widening of the
commercial designation to include the residential parcel to the north is logical in that it creates a
more viable commercial site by increasing the site from 9.5 acres to 19 acres. This will assist in
averting isolated fragmented development. As a consequence the environmental impact
associated with this project is expected to be less than significant.
1 .b The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with
jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of
SC. Impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact
Repod for (EIR) the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of
the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their padicular agency. Mitigation
measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project. Furlher, all agencies with jurisdiction over
the project are also being given the oppodunity to comment on the project and it is anticipated that they will
make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or
polices. The project site has been previously graded and services have been extended into the area.
There will be limited, if any environmental effects on environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies
with jurisdiction over the project. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this proiect.
1 .d This site as well as adjacent properties to the north west and east are located in areas identified
as Farmland of Local Importance. Currently isolated farming does occur in and around the site;
however, these areas are not within areas under Williamson Act contract. The City of Temecula
General Plan has anticipated that this property will ultimately be developed with uses other than
agriculture and would consequently no longer be utilized for agricultural production. As a
consequence any environmental impacts associated with this project is expected to be less than
significant.
1 .e The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minority community). There is no established residential community
(including low-income or minority community) at this site. Furthermore, the site is a vacant, and
the reduction in the amount of residenttally zoned property being proposed in this project will be
minor. As a consequence no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\CEQAL318PA98.1ES Final-modified
: i: tssUesEahdES~ingilnformation:Sources:
Potentially
, Signi~canl
j_ __Impact
Polenlially
Significanl
Unless
Miligation
Incorporalod..
Less Than
Significanl
Impact
Nf~
I~Up~Icl
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
2.a.
2.c.
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
Projects? (Source 1. Page 2-23)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or
extension of major infrastructure)?
Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
X
X
X
Comments
2.a.
2,b.
2.c.
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The
project will ultimately result in the construction of community commercial facilities Since the
project is intended to ultimately serve the needs of the existing residents, the proposed
development will not be a significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively
exceed official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated as a
result of this project.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project
will not likely cause people to relocate to or within Temecula, but will the uses which will ultimately
be constructed on the site will serve the needs of existing residents. Therefore, the project will not
induce substantial growth in the area, and no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
The project will not displace any type of housing. The project site is vacant with proposed zoning,
which is commercial, and as a consequence no housing will be displaced. No significant effects
are anticipated as a result of this project.
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving?
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
Fault rupture? (source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6 )
Seismic ground shaking?
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (source 1,
Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
Landslides or mudflows? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions form excavation, grading or fill?
Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2. Page 7-8)
Expansive soils?
Unique geologic or physical features?
X
X
X
X
R:\PLANNING\CEQAL318PA98.1ES Final-modified
4.f.-h.
4.i.
::: E ' Potentially ............. : .....
i ~ i: Potentially Significanl Less Than
:: : :E: : :: i :: Significant Unless Significanl ! No
itSSueS:ahd::S~!~]nfOrmationiS0urces Impact Mitigation Impacl ~hnl,acl
:: ~ :: ::: :: ~: Incorporated I
This proposal is change in land use designation only, and no development is being prol~'~'e'd a{"
this time. The ultimate development of the site; however, may have a less than significant
impact with respect to the change in the quantity and quality of ground waters. Because this
proposal does not involve any development at this time, any impacts associated with this change
in land use designations is considered less than significant.
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant impact in the
reduction in the amount of ground water otherwise available for public water supplies. Because
of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to
be limited. The impact as a result of the change in land use designations is considered less than
significant.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.a.
5.b.
5.c.
5.d.
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (source 1, Page
29)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors?
X
X
X
X
Comments
5.a
5.b.,d.
5.c.
The prop~)s~a '~'~' i~i"i~a ~i~E~;a'ard 0~, co~jFjbute
to an existing or projected air quality violation. As a consequence no significant impacts are
The project will not expose sensitive r~ceptors to pollu~ants. There are no sensitive receptors in
proximity to the project. According to the City's Development Code, standards with regards to
the generation of particulate matter, smoke, dust, dirt, ash, odors, toxics and other noxious matter
apply equally to all commercial zones.
The proposed change in land use designation will not alter air movement, moisture or
temperature, or cause any change in climate. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
6.a.
6.c.
6.d.
6.e.
6.f.
6.g.
Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses)?
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
X
X
X
X
Comments:
R:\PLANNING\CEQAL318PA98.1ES Final-modified
6'.'a.
6.d.
Potentially i
Potentially Significant Less Than ·
Significanl Unless Signilicanl i Ne
Issues and Suppealing Infolmalion Sources Impact Mitigation hnpac{ ._~mp;~<:l
Incorporaled .....
The proposal is located in an area where current conditions are such that the road system
experiences occasional traffic congestion at peak times. To address these conditions the City of
Temecula, CALTRANS and the County of Riverside have several regional circulation
improvement projects proposed. In some cases these projects are currently under construction.
Area traffic congestion is expected to significantly improve when these scheduled improvements
have been completed. This proposal would shift the General Plan and Zoning designations from
one commercial designation to another and a portion of the site from residential to commercial. It
is anticipated; however, that because of the limited nature of future development, most sites are
significantly constrained with utility easements and environmental site limitations, that a less than
significant impact upon traffic is anticipated. The project will have a less than significant impact
upon increased vehicle trips or tra..ff..!..c......cg....ngestion.
This proposal is change in land use designati'<~"~'~i~;;"~'~l" ~'~' ~j'~;~ei{:j~'~.e~"i~'b'~;i~g 'prop0'~:~'d at
.t...h.!,.s...t.i.,.m.,e.,....A...s....a....c.,.o...nsequ..e..n...ce n..o..!.m..pac...~....a..re associated with thisp.._rgje..c..t.:
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
7.8.
7.b.
7.c.
7.d.
7.e.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)? (source 4)
Locally designated species (e.g.heritage trees)? (source 4)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
X
X
X
Comments:
7.a.,b.
7.c.
The project site for the proposed change in land use lies within in an area designated by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service as potential habitat for the Federally listed endangered species the
Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. This proposal does not actually represent a development proposal.
However, any future development of the site, as with any development projects which fall within
this boundary, will be required to conduct a biological survey to determine if the vegetational
association best suited for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly is present and if the organism is an
actual inhabitant of the property. A Mitigation measure, requiring the applicant of a development
proposal on this property to conduct a biological survey of the property prior to the approval of
any development proposal, has been included. A biological survey of the property shall include
appropriate mitigation measures for the development of this property. With proper mitigation
measures, future development is anticipated to cause a less than significant impacts as a result
of this project.
The project site is currently disturbed and largely undeveloped. There are no locally designated
communities, wetland habitat areas, or wildlife corridors on or around the site. Future
development proposals for this site will receive appropriately detailed environmental review. As
a result, no impacts are anticipated at this time.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~318PA98.1ES Final-modified
8.a.
8.c.
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?.
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potenlially
Significant
Unless
Miligation
._.l.ncorporatod
Loss Than
Significant
Impact
X
No
Irnpacl
X
X
Comments:
8.8.
8.b.
8.c.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project
will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation during
the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with
these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a
wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the
daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural
resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as
significant.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of
future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.8.
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
9.a.
The project will not result in a significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the release of any
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in
the request. While some retail uses may have the potential to sell hazardous substances, they
are regulated by both the Fire Department and the Department of Environmental Health. Future
development must receive clearance from the Department of Environmental Health prior to any
plan check submittal. Future development must receive clearance from the Fire Department prior
to the issuance of a building permit. This applies to storage and use of hazardous materials. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~31 8PA98.1ES Final-modified
i ~: :: ::: iiii::i Potenlially .... I
i i :: ~: :: Potentially Significant Less Than j Na
:~::: i i~ Significanl Unless Significant
: : :~Ziiii~ ~ i~lSS~;s and Supporting Inl'ormahon Sources Impoct Mitigaton Impacl [ hnpacl
: : :: :j!~::~: ~:;~ :! ' . ........... incorporated ..........
9.b. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan.
The subject site is not located in an area, which could impact an emergency response plan. The
project will take access from maintained streets and will therefore not impede any emergency
response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
9.c. The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check
stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable
laws. Reference response 9.a. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d. The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health
hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
9.e. The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush, grass, or
trees. The project is in an area of existing uses and proposed commercial uses. The project is
not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
10.a. Increase in existing noise levels? (Source 1, page 8-9)
10.b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X
X
Comments:
lO.a.
10.b.
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is
vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during
construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. However, the
project site is adjacent to State Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road which are both
designated as access restricted six-lane urban arterial roadways. Ambient noise levels 100 feet
from centerline are 70.2 to 75.2 CNEL for Highway 79 South and range within 65 CNEL for
Butterfield Stage Road. According to the City's General Plan, it is appropriate to place insensitive
land uses such as commercial adjacent to noise generators such as highways. Long-term noise
generated by this project would be similar to existing and proposed uses in the area. Noise
impacts are anticipated to be less than significant as a result of this project in either the short or
long-term.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase (short-term). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+
DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady
8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be
considered significant. There will be no long-term exposure of people to noise. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
11.a.
11.b.
11.c.
11.d.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~318PA98.1ES Final-modified
11.e.
Issues and Supporfing Illformation Sources
..... ] ~ther gov~'r~'~ntal services?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Polentially
Significanl
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Na
h'npacl
Ix~
Comments:
11.a
b.
11c
11d.
11.e.
ffi~'~"~f'i'~"~e i~'i~j"G~"a~i~'~ii'~'~"~i~:' ~'~"'~0 deVelOpment i~"~'~g pmP~'
this time. T~ugh wh~ a development proposal Is pro~ssed br ~e site there ~11 be a need
for new or altered fire ~ police protection ~ich will incrementally in~ease t~ need for fire and
police protection, this is not considered to ~ ~ i.m~ at this time. As a ~nsequen~, no
i~p~.~..Erp .ant~p9.~q~.,~.~..~ .[~s~t.gf ~hiq P{gj.q~.
This proposal is chan~ in land use designation only, and no development is being proposed at
this time. Future developm~t of ~e site may result ~ a n~d for new or altered s~ool fa~lities,
but at this time the pro~sal will have no impact on sc~ols. In addition, ~e project will not cause
significant numbera of ~ople to re~te within ~ to the City of Temecuta and therefore will not
result ~ a ne~ for new or altered school facilities. As a ~nsequence ,no impacts are an~cipated
as a result 9~.~hj~~.
~he projed will ~ve a less ~an' ~i~'~'i~'i'~'~'~'&'~'i'~'E"ih~"'~ainte~n~
including made. Funding for maintenance of roads will be dedved from ~e City's Development
Impact Fees (DIF),' and State gasoline taxes, Thigh fu~re development of the site may impact
to ~rrent and future ~eds for maintenan~ of roads this projed ~11 not ~ult in any impact to
p~.~.~ie~:...~. ~. ~9.~queqp~ qq imp.~t.~..~m..~p~t~. ~ a.m.~.~r ~b~.~ .p~pj~.ct.
The proje~ will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
seaices. No signifi~nt impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS: Would the proposal
result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
12.d.
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste disposal?
Local or regional water supplies?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
12.a.
12.b.
12.c.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
communication systems (reference response No. 12.a. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~318PA98.1ES Final-modified
12.e.
12.f.
12.g.
Potenlially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Issues and Supporling Into,marion Sources Impact Mitigation Impact Impacl
.................. Incorporated
The project will ~ot result 'in a need for ne~ ~ystems or supplies, or substantial alt~r~i~'~,~'{~ ........
sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon
existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan
states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required
in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed
General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." It is anticipated that the
proposal to change the designation from Office to Commercial, and the limited nature of future
development under this designation, would not significantly increase the demand for systems or
supplies. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Future development may require additional storm water drainage facilities onsite. However,
because this project is a change in General Plan and Zoning designations from one commercial
category to another, no specific development proposals are being proposed at this time. Any
specific development proposal would receive an appropriately detailed environmental review. No
significant impacts am anticipated at this time.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste
disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be
mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are
implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local
or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
13.a.
13.b.
13.c.
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect?
Create light or glare?
X
X
Comments:
13.a
13.b.
13c
T~'~'~;'(ty does r~F'l~av~' any designate~t' scenic highways, Since this project does not represent
development proposal, at this time it is anticipated that all future developments on the site will be
reviewed to ensure that project design provides appropriate aesthetic benefits in accordance with
the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines, No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this pr..oj. ect
~'~"pr~'l~osal 'i~ Char i"iFi"i; ' ' i pr~p~'~d ai
this time. Consequently, the project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect and
_n..0...impac..t..s.....a.r..e ant.!dpate.d.- .............................................................................................................
This proposal is change in land use designation only, and no development is being proposed' at
this time. Future development of the site may have an impact with respect to light and glare in
that the project will more than likely produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this
type results in new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount
Palomar Observatory. Consequently future development will be conditioned to be consistent with
Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). However, since this project is only a
change in land use designation and no development is being proposed at this time no impacts
are a. nticipated as a .result of this project.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
14.a. I Disturb paleontological resources? (source 2, Figure 55 ) ~
I I ix
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~31 8PA98.1ES Final-modified
ISSues and S._~!ng Informalioii~Soerces
Polentially
Signiticanl
Impact
14.b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Page 281)
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
Affect historical resources?
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Polenlially
Significant
Unless
Mitigalion
Incorporaled
X
X
Less Than ;
Significanl No
Impact Lhnpacl
X
X
Comments:
14.b.
14.c.
14.d.
14.e.
The General Plan identifies a sensitive archaeological area at the intersection of State Highway
79 South and Butterfield Stage Road, which may extend to the subject site. Due to the potential
for deposits in the area, future development of the proposed site will be required to conduct a
Phase I archeological investigation on site prior to the approval any development project. The
potential for future significant impacts will be determined and fully mitigated when future
development proposals are considered.
There are no known historical resources on site, which the project would impact. As a
consequence no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change affecting unique ethnic cultural
values. Reference response 14.b,c. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. As
a consequence no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
15.a.
15.b.
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
X
X
Comments:
15.a.,
b.
The project will not impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other
recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within
or to the City of Temecula. The same is true for the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
16.a.
16.b.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,
R:\PLANNING\CEQA%31 8PA98.1ES Final-modified
X
X
16.c.
16.d.
Issues and Suppolling Informalion Sources
to the disadvantage of long-term, ~vironmeF~l goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Signi~canl Unless Signilicant
Impact Mitigation Impact
Inco~]~orated .......
X
EARLIER ANALYSES. None
SOURCES
2.
3.
4.
City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Habitat Map (compiled by the
Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency [TLMA] GIS Division -
dated June 4, 1998)
Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel No. 060742-0005-B (November 20, 1996)
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~31 8PA98.1ES Final-modified
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA98-0318 (General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to fault rupture, seismic
ground shaking, seismic ground failure, or earthquake
hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the
initial grading plan check. Building pads shall be certified
by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building
permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety
Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, expansive soils or earthquake
hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the
Uniform Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
Water
General Impact:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity).
Mitigation Measure:
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance
with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance
with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements.
Specific Process:
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego
Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for
their review and approval.
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~31 8PA98.1ES Final-modified
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
Biological Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens
Kangaroo Rat habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds).
Requirement of biologic survey at the time of the submittal
of a development proposal for the site.
At the time of the submittal of a development proposal on
the project site the applicant shall submit a biological
survey at the appropriate time of the year to determine if
the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly or any other endangered
or threatened species are present on site. This biological
survey shall propose appropriate mitigation for
development of the site.
Upon submittal of a development proposal.
Planning Department
R:\PLANNING\CEQA~318PA98.1ES Final-modified
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98.CC.doc
15
CITY OF TEMECULA
//
t /I/
~/'
CREEK
!
EMECULA,,,
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
CASE NUMBER: PA98-0318 AND PA98-0449
EXHIBIT- A
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE - JNAUARY 12, 1999
VICINITY MAP
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .CC.doc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
LM
', ,..M,X ,, LM
os ' \
x_~..~.//2""'~
L
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
CASE NUMBER: PA98-0318 AND PA98-0449
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE - JANUARY 12, 1999
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\318PA98 .CC.doc
17
ITEM
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/.~U.,Co
Gary Thornhill, C~3m°"~nity Development Director
January 12, 1999
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-1) Planning Application
PA97-0237: (General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Prepared by: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOM MEN DATION:
1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA97-0237.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA97-0237)"
3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF
THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019,
020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22,100 THROUGH
17.22,108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. I (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)"
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this proposal is to develop site-specific land use standards
for a unique commercial situation along the east side of Pala Road south of Murrieta Creek.
The site has a number of significant constraints that make it difficult to construct buildings or to
fully develop under the current zoning designations. These constraints include: floodways,
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC'I .doc
1
floodplains, fault zone setback areas, and a major regional utility. Because of these constraints,
staff developed a proposed solution to enable reasonable development on these constrained
sites that also protected the surrounding community. Components of this proposal are as
follows:
Amend the General Plan to change the land use designation for three of the four
parcels from Office to Neighborhood Commercial (the fourth parcel is already
designated as Neighborhood Commercial);
Change the Zoning Map to designate all four parcels as PDO-1 (Planned
Development Overlay District No. 1); and
Add the land use and development standards for PDO-1 into the Development
Code.
This item was originally noticed and heard at the December 15, 1997 Planning Commission
hearing. At that time, the Commission requested that staff review the matter further. Staff had
prepared additional information and an alternative proposal for the January 5, 1998 Planning
Commission meeting but the item was continued due to property owner concerns. This item
was subsequently continued at the January 26, 1998, February 2, 1998, March 2, 1998, and
was finally heard at the December 2, 1998 Planning Commission meetings. At this final
meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the proposed Planned Development
Overlay District No. 1. One of the reasons this proposal was initially considered was staff's
concern that its early approval could jeopardize the ability of the City to widen Pala Road. At
this time, staff is confident that this proposal will no longer create problems with these
infrastructure improvements.
The Planning Commission Resolution recommending the approval of the General Plan
Amendment and Planning Development Overlay are contained in Attachment No. 3. The latest
Planning Commission Staff Report is contained in Attachment No. 4 and the copies of the
minutes from the Commission meetings are included in Attachment Nos. 5-A through 5-E.
DISCUSSION: The provisions allowing the creation of Planned Development Overlays are
contained in Chapter 17.22 of the Development Code. The stated purpose of the Planned
Development Overlay Zoning District is to allow for the creation of modified zoning standards in
areas that are too small for a specific plan, not located appropriately for a village center, and
that further the implementation of the General Plan. It is expected that these modified
standards will generally be the same as for the underlying zoning designation.
The Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) would create customized zoning
requirements based upon the Neighborhood Commercial Zone. The proposed PDO would take
63 of 68 permitted and conditionally permitted uses from the Neighborhood Commercial zone
and combine them with 15 to 20 other land uses that are primarily taken from the Service
Commercial zone. Most of these additional uses are for businesses that rely on outdoor storage
as part of their operation. In addition, the PDO also includes several rural serving commercial
uses that appear to be compatible with this location. A comparison of the various permitted
uses for the Neighborhood Commercial, Service Commercial, and the proposed Pala Road
PDO Zone are contained in Attachment No. 5.
The site development and performance standards would be the same as the Neighborhood
Commercial Zone with the exception that supplemental screening and landscape requirements
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
2
along Pala Road, next to Temecula Creek and next to the adjacent residences have been
added to PDO-1. Staff believes that this tailored list of permitted and conditionally permitted
uses and the modified development standards will provide for adequate economic opportunities
for the property owners as well as minimize noise and traffic impacts on the surrounding
community.
The Planning Commission has evaluated a number of options and variations to try to address
the many site constraints. The proposed Planned Development Overlay District provides the
appropriate flexibility and design standards necessary to allow reasonable development in a
manner compatible with the surrounding area. As a result, the Planning Commission
recommends that a single Planned Development Overlay District, PDO-1, be created for all four
parcels. A copy of the proposed overlay zoning is contained in Exhibit A of Attachment No. 2.
FINDINGS:
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone, as proposed, are
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it
remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
The project is compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The site is already zoned
for commercial uses and is already being partially used for commercial purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An initial environmental study was performed for this
project and determined that the proposal could potentially affect geology, water,
transportation/circulation, aesthetic and cultural resources. The study was prepared only for the
general plan amendment and zone change because no detailed development proposals have
been submitted to the City. The Initial Study was originally circulated between November 26,
1997 and December 15, 1997 and no comments were received. Any mitigation measures
identified in the initial study document will be implemented when detailed development
proposals are submitted. A copy of the Initial Environmental Study is contained in Attachment
No. 7
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is not
expected to add any significant operating costs to the City of Temecula.
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 ,doc
3
Attachments:
Resolution No. 99- - Page 5
Ordinance No. 99- - Page 8
Exhibit A - Proposed Planned Development Overlay District No 1 - Page 12
Planning Commission Resolution PC98-046 - Page 22
December 2, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 23
Planning Commission Minutes
A. December 15, 1997 Meeting - Page 24
B. January 12, 1998 Meeting - Page 25
C. February 2, 1998 Meeting - Page 26
D. March 2, 1998 Meeting - Page 27
E. December 2, 1998 Meeting - Page 28
Comparison of Permitted Uses - Page 29
Initial Environmental Study- Page 37
Exhibits - Page 38
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
5
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA97-0237)
WHEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term General Plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan.
WHEREAS, Sections 65350 of the Government Code permits a city to amend the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to accurately
reflect private property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on December
15, 1997 and December 2, 1998, with numerous continuances, and recommended that the City
Council approve the attached amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby
amends the General Plan Land Use Designations for the parcels identified as APN 950-110-
018,019, and 032 from Office (0) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
6
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
of the
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
,1999 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS 201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF
THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019,
020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH
17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. I (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private
property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on December
15, 1997, and December 2, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached
amendments to the City Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoning Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcels identified as APN 950-110-018, 019, and 032: change the Zoning
designation from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay No. I (PDO-1).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 950-110-020, change the Zoning Designation
from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Planned Development Overlay No. I (PDO-1).
Section 2. Planned Development Overlay No. 1 The City Council hereby adopts the
supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-1, Planned Development Overlay District
No. 1 as contained in Exhibit A of this ordinance.
\\TEMEC_FS 201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
9
Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
10
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
__th day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
11
EXHIBIT A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 1
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC 1 .doc
12
PALA ROAD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.100 Title
Sections 17.22.100 through 17.22.108 shall be known as "PDO-I" (Pala Road Planned
Development Overlay District).
17.22.102 Purpose and intent
The Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-1) is intended to provide
regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique commercial area
within the city. The area is significantly constrained with easements, flood plains, potential fault
zones, and adjacent residential development. This special overlay zoning district regulation is
intended to permit a range of neighborhood convenience uses, with selected outdoor storage
and other appropriate rural serving commercial uses. Supplemental performance standards
have also been provided to ensure compatibility with the adjacent neighborhoods and to protect
adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially
objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement
the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Development
Code.
17.22.104 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Pala
Road Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.106.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.108, the following rules
and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to
any development within a Neighborhood Commercial zoning district that are in effect at the time
an application is deemed complete.
2. The citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
3. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are
in effect at the time an application is deemed complete.
4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time
an application is deemed complete.
17.22.106 Use Regulations
The list of permitted land uses for the Pala Road Planned Development Overlay district
is contained in Table 17.22.106. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a permitted
use. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a
conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC 1 .doc
13
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automobile
Automotive
Automotive
car wash
B
Bakery goods distribution
Bakery retail
Bakery wholesale
Banks and financial institutions
A
Adult business
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq.
ft.)
Airports
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient)
Alcoholic beverage sales
Ambulance services
Animal hospital (indoor only)
Antique restoration
Antique sales
Apparel and accessory shops
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances)
Arcades (pinball and video games)
Art supply stores
Auction houses
Auditoriums and conference facilities
Automobile dealers (new and used)
Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display
Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs
painting and body shop
repair services
rental
salvage yards/impound yards
service stations with or without an automated car wash
parts -sales
service stations selling beer and/or wine -with or without an automated
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
14
IPDO-1
P
C1
C
P
P
P
P
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Barber and beauty shops
Bed and breakfast
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services)
Billlard parlor/pool hall
Binding of books and similar publications
Blood bank
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services
Bookstores
Bowling alley
Building material sales
Butcher shop
C
Cabinet shop
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs)
Candy/confectionery sales
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning
Catering services
Clothing sales
Coins, purchase and sales
Cold storage facilities
Communications and microwave installations2
Communications equipment sales
Community care facilities
Computer sales and service
Congregate care housing for the elderly
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market
Costume rentals
Crematoriums
Cutlery
D
Data processing equipment 7a~a~systems
'Day care ce~eFs
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc 15
IPDO-1
P
P
P
P
C5
P
P
C
P
P
P
C5
P
P
P
C5
C5
C
P
P
P
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Delicatessen
Discount/department store
Distribution facility
Drug store/pharmacy
Dry cleaners
Dry cleaning plant
E
Emergency shelters
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage)
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales
Financial, insurance, real estate offices
Fire and police stations
Floor covering sales
Florist shop
Food processing
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity
Freight terminals
Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.
Glass and mirrors, retail sales
Governmental offices less than 5,000 sq. ft.
Grocery store, retail
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales
H
Hardware stores .....
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
16
IPDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C5
P
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Health food store
Health care facility
Heliports
Hobby supply shop
Home and business maintenance service
Hospitals
Hotels/motels
I
Ice cream parlor
Impound yard
Interior decorating service
J
Junk or salvage yard
K
Kennel
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers
Laundromat
Laundry service (commercial)
Libraries, museums and galleries (private)
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores
Lithographic service
Locksmith
M
Machine shop
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses
IPDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
P
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
17
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
following:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication
of goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry,
furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling,
and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or
fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or
the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing
within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and
terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or
semirefined products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and
outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage
Medical equipment sales/rental
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse4
Mobile home sales and service
Motio~ picture st~]dio
Motorcycle sales and service
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio
N
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club
Nurseries (retail)
Nursing homes/convalescent homes
O
~Office equipment/supplieS, sales/serviceS ....
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft.
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited
to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, real estate, insurance
P
Paint and wallpaper stores
Parcel delivery services
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
18
IPDO-1
P
P
C
C5
C
C
P
P
P
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Parking lots and parking structures
Pawnshop
Personal service sh~ps
Pest control services
Pet grooming/pet shop
Photographic studio
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission)
Q
~,eserved
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices
Radio/television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard
Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without a day care or private school
Religious institution, with a private school
Religious institution, with a day care
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use
for use of the proprietor of the business)
Residential, multiple-family housing
Restaurant, drive-in/fast food
Restaurants and other eating establishments
Restaurants'~viEh lounge or live entertainment
Retail support use (15 percent of ~0~al development'square footage in BP and LI)
Rooming and boarding houses
S
Scale, public
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc 19
IPDO-1
P
P
P
C5
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
P
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
Schools, business and professional
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12)
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports and recreational facilities
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building3
Swap Meet, outdoor
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales
T
Tailor shop
Taxi or limousine service
Tile sales
Tobacco shop
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck rentals (no sales or/service)
TV/VCR repair
U
Upholstery shop
V
Vending machine sales and service
W
Warehousing/distribution
Watch repair
Wedding chapels
Welding shop
Welding supply and service (enclosed)
Y
Reserved
IPDO-1
C
P
P
P
P
P
C5
I P
I P
P
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
20
Z
'Re~erved
Table 17.22.106
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use
IPDO-1
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G), special standards for the sale of alcoholic
beverages.
2. Subject to citywide antenna standards.
3. See Section 17.08,050.(E), special standards for indoor swap meets.
4. See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities.
5. Subject to the special setback provisions contained in Section 17.22.108.
17.22.108 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards
A. In addition to the standard setback and landscape requirements of the
Neighborhood Commercial Zone contained in Chapter 17.08, the following special setback
provisions shall be required for all uses identified with a ,,s "in the Permitted Use Matrix and for
all other similar outdoor use and storage activities.
1. Outdoor use and storage activities shall be located on the rear portions of
each site and shall be fully screened from public view and from adjacent residences.
2. When it is not possible (due to site or use constraints) to locate outdoor
use and/or storage activities in the rear portions of the property, a landscaped buffer area, not
less than twenty feet in width and backed with an architecturally integrated screening wall shall
be installed. No parking or loading areas are allowed in this visual buffer area. The height of the
wall shall be six feet. The height of the wall may be increased to eight feet if deemed necessary
and appropriate by the Community Development Director.
B. All development within PDO-1 shall also comply with the following supplemental
buffering requirements:
1. When adjacent to residential uses: a transitional landscaped area, not
less than five feet in width shall be installed. The landscaping shall include (at a minimum)
trees, shrubs, and appropriate ground cover and should be located outside of the walls used to
screen these commercial uses.
2. When adjacent to Temecula Creek: an additional transitional landscaped
area, outside of any fences or walls, not less than five feet shall be installed and shall be
planted with appropriate native tree and shrub plant species commonly found within Southern
California riparian areas. Temporary irrigation may be required to ensure plant establishment.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
21
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNtNG\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
22
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION
ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP ON THE EAST
SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW
CANYON ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0237)" AND ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON
THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-
110-018, 019, 020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH
17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0237)"
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall
be consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on December 15, 1997 and December 2, 1998
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED E~A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)" AND ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA
ROAD SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019, 020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS
17.22.100 THROUGH 17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA97-0237)" SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORMS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION
AS EXHIBITS A AND B, RESPECTIVELY.
R:\staffrpt\237PA97 .PC6.doc
6
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of December,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GUERRIERO, NAGGAR, SLAVEN,
SOLTYSIAK, WEBSTER
NOES:
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\staffrpt\237PA97 .PC6.doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - DECEMBER 2, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
23
ATTACHMENT NO. 5-A
DECEMBER 15, 1997 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
24
'nage system will be installed to carry the water from above his property to Temecula
note hat this drainage issue must be resolved prior to the development of the lower :ion
of the pr ' ct; and clarified that staff of Assessment District 159 are working on th ' s not
City staff m bers. Mr. Corona noted that he has seen no progress with regar o this issue.
MOTION: Commiss~ er Miller moved to close the public hearing; to m a determination of
consistency with a proj t for which an Environmental Impact Repor as previously certified;
approved by the Community Devel ment Director. The was seconded by Commissioner
Guerriero and voice vote of those pre nt reflected approval (Chairwoman Fahey
PC RESOI O. 97-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CC THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING CITY ADOPT AN 0 INANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF ] COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ECULA APPROVING
PLANNING APP NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AME ENT #6 OF THE
PALOMA D SOL SPECIFIC PLAN SP NO. 219)," WHICH GENERALLY
LOCAT NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROA OUTH OF
PAU ROAD AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KN N AS
P;~LC~A~U~PA~~~~RCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-020-004, 0-
6. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE
CHANGE)
Planning Commission consideration to cleanup General Plan Amendment and Zone
Change, changing the designations from Office to Service Commercial and
Neighborhood Commercial, and from Neighborhood Commercial to Service Commercial.
RECOMMENDATION
It was recommended by staff that the Planning Commission approve the request.
Because of the close proximity of his residence to the subject site (Agenda Item No. 6) and
because he is a consultant for the City with regard to the Western Bypass Corridor (Agenda
Item No. 7), Commissioner Soltysiak advised that he would be abstaining with regard to Agenda
Item Nos. 6 and 7. He wished everyone a Happy Holiday Season and departed the meeting at
this time.
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the
Planning Commission
December 15, 1997
storage facility has been eliminated and that if this request were approved, the existing towing
yard would be considered a legal non-conforming use.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the City does not have any time constraints with
regard to non-conforming uses, noting that the only mechanism to conform a non-conforming
use would be if the applicant of such a use would be desirous of making a change to the
property; thereby, the property would have to adhere to the existing standards of the
Development Code.
Mrs. Sharon Miller, 44618 Pala Road, owner of the existing mini-storage facility since June
1983, informed the Commissioners that she and her husband had received a life-time
Conditional Use Permit from the County; that a permit was obtained in 1986 with regard to the
rental trucks; that a portion of Parcel 2 was leased, with the permission of the County, to
accommodate the truck rental business; and that no homes had been constructed in this area
in 1983 when the business was started. Because of the impact this rezoning would have on
her property, Mrs. Miller spoke in opposition to this zone change and requested that her
property be zoned to accurately reflect the current use -- Service Commercial.
Because of the accumulation of dirt and because of the negative aesthetic appearance,
Ms. Stacy Ketter, 45352 Tournament Lane, expressed concern and questioned the legality of
the parked moving trucks on Parcel No. 1. With regard to Parcel No. 1, it was noted by staff
that this parcel is zoned Office Professional and, therefore, the parking of moving trucks on this
lot would be illegal.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the owner of Parcel No. 4 (currently zoned neighborhood
commercial), relayed the owner's support of this zone change and suggested that Mrs. Miller's
property be rezoned, making it consistent with the existing use.
Commenting on concerns expressed by neighboring residents with regard to traffic on Pala
Road, staff elaborated on the proposal to redesignate the front portion of three of the four
parcels as Neighborhood Commercial (noting that the fourth parcel is already zoned
Neighborhood Commercial) and to redesignate the rear portion of all four parcels as Service
Commercial.
For aesthetic purposes, Vice Chairwoman Slaven relayed her support with the above-mentioned
proposal.
Expressing a concern with regard to the level of traffic on Pala Road, Commissioner Guerriero
requested that this matter be continued to a future meeting so that the Commission may
obtain additional information with regard to future traffic impacts.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Senior Planner Hogan commented on the Pala Road extension and
its impact on Parcel No. 1.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue Planning Application No. PA97-0237 to the
Planning Commission
December 15, 1997
January 5, 1997, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Guerriero and voice vote of those present (Chairwoman Fahey absent and Commissioner
Soltysiak abstained).
At 7:44 P.M., a short recess was taken with the Commission reconvening at 7:54 P.M.
7. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
im
Commission consideration to design, construct, and operate a total ot
square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters, and shops and
lents (hardscape, parking, and landscaping) on 16.5 acres.
aciated
REI
)N
It was
that the Planning Commission approve th~ uest.
By way of a color renderin
landscape plan, elevation,
for the proposed project, advisinc
area located to the north, a parking
that the proposed billboards will be
use of the project. Because the a
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
of a condition to ensure compliance.
Associate Planner Fagan reviewE in detail, the site plan,
environmental issues and parking analyses
at the project encompas three components -- a parking
~a located to the s< and the core area. He advised
as and will only be for internal
must c~ >ly with the recommendations of the
District, he suggested the imposition
For Commissioner Guerriero, Principal
has reviewed the traffic analysis complE
the conclusion that once the
at service level "D."
by Wilbur
improvements
advised that the City's Traffic Engineer
ith and Associates and concurred with
ompleted, lower SR 79 will remain
Mr. Zev Buffman, a 41893 Main Street, announced that the ipated opening date
will be early sumr of 1999, giving the Entertainment Center and the Town merchants
ample time to for the year 2000 celebrations. Mr. Buffman extended ~reciation and
commendati to staff and the Planning Commissioners for their efforts ed with this
project.
Rela his parents' greetings and Happy Holiday wishes, Mr. Roy Rogers, Jr., ville,
in the Commissioners and the audience members that RogersDale USA is a ~-
perated business, not a corporation; commented on the attributes of the City which attract~
Planning Commission
December 15, 1997
ATTACHMENT NO. 5-B
JANUARY 12, 1998 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC_FS 201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
25
notin.g that th.e sign of discussion would have . s d.,...ply with the old County Sign Ordinan.ce. Ms. Ubnoske,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AND ZONE CHANGE)
Continued to the January 26, 1998, Planning Commission meeting; see page 2.
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 (AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 199)
inning Commission consideration to correct the residential development
lards matrix by removing the lot coverage standard unintentionally
during the processing of Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan No. 199.
DATION
To approve uesL
ProjectPlannerDonahoe
the request (as per staff report of record).
Mr. Bany Burnell, representing the
questions and/or concerns.
concurred with the staff repo
relayed his availability to answer
Expressing no objection to the overall develo;nt and/or the re<
Road, #85 (Heritage Park), informed the ~n that as
the south side of General Kearny Road has been
pictures, Ms. Harker further elaborated on this traffic
permitted until the area of concern is sandbagged an
Ms. Evelyn Harker, 31130 S. General Kearny
no sandbagging and the recent heavy rains,
has resulted in numerous potholes. By way of
She requested that no further development be
and gutters have been constructed.
Advising that the Public Works Department has
Commission and Ms. Harker that the
that discussions are in progress with the
and completing the entire half width of
those potholes in City-maintained ar~Yas would be addressed by the Public
//
required and to adopt R¢elution No. 98-001. The motion was seconded by
those present re~ecte/d~nanimous approval (Chairwoman Fahey absent).
/
// PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-001
/
/
,/
apprised he matter, Principal Engineer Parks informed the
as expressed In with sandbagging the area of concern and
to completing cul-de-sac, developing the maintenance area,
Kearny Road. With the potholes, Mr. Parks advised that
rks Department.
with a project for which an
Jbsequent EIR would not be
;r Miller and voice vote of
,~_/RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
/ RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
/RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA
WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO
R ,~PLANCOMiVNVIINUTES\I998\l -5-98 WPD 11/10/98 vgw 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 5-C
FEBRUARY 2, 1998 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC1 .doc
26
Temecula Plannincl Commission February 2, 1998
Although the Southside Specific Plan has not been completed Senior Planner Hogan ' ed
that the'j~elLn3_inary stages of this Plan seem to indicate that the area south of se Market will
be zoned High~urist.
In light of her existing conc~"witl3 the compatibility of sur ing properties in the area of
discussion Chairwoman Fahey, e~h'0'ed--b.y Commi ' ers Guerriero and Slaven, expressed
concern with the proposed request and ho~" further impact an already existing
compatibility issue.
Viewing a color render' that once the upcoming
imp. rovements ' n will serve as a
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND
ZONE CHANGE
Senior Planner Hogan advised that staff is requesting that this item be continued to the March 2,
1998, Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue PA97-0237 to the March 2, 1998, Planning
Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of
those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioner Soltysiak absent).
8. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0398 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Plan ' Commission consideration for the design, construction, a
operatio f a 8,684 square foot restaurant with associated par ' g and
landscaping 1.51 acres.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by staff th he Commis ' n adopt the Negative Declaration
for Planning Application No. PA9 98- opt the Mitigation Monitoring Program
for Planning Application No. PA97-0 · and adopt Resolution No. 98-002.
R 02
A RESOLUTION OF CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING P OPMENT PLAN)
TO DESIGN NT WITH
, LANDSCAPING, AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON A 1.5
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 5-D
MARCH 2, 1998 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
27
Temecula Planning Commission
March 2, 1998
t area of discussion, relayed his understanding that this Item would be continued off calen
and Id be renoticed at the completion of the Pala Road bridge design. Chairwoma ey
confirme Markham's understanding.
MOTION: Commissio Slaven moved for the approval of the Agend amended (Agenda
Item No.3 continue.d off-cal r). The motion was seconded b mmissioner Miller and voice
,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Planning Application No. PA97-0237 (General Plan Amendment and Zone Chan~e)
A request to cleanup General Plan Amendment and Zone Change changing the
the designations from Office to Service Commercial and Neighborhood Commercial,
and from Neighborhood Commercial to Service Commercial.
RECOMMENDATION
Continued off calendar.
4:""""-~lannin,cl Application No. PA97-0409 (Development Plan)
A reque o construct and operate a 71,978 square foot Self- rage facility
including an 'ce and manager's residential unit on a 2 acre site for Murrieta
Creek Self-Storag
Assistant Planner Anders reviewed staff report ecord) and referenced the following
added and amended conditions:
Add
To allow the Planni to approve any modifications
!o the site or t lution of the easement
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 5-E
DECEMBER 2, 1998 MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS',PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
28
an additional condition regarding revising the final site and grading plan to reflect the actual fault line
~n additional condition restricting the use of barbed or razor wire being attached to the fence
an
litional condition with regard to the fence, prohibiting the use of and that there be additional
~the fence
~vines
The motion was seconded b'
Naggar who voted n_o.
~mmissioner Guerdero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
exception of Commission
4. Planning Apl~lication No. 5-0079 (Tentative Parcel Mal~ No. 28257)
Request to subdivide
four (4) residential parcels
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning
deny the request.
Project Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (
the September 2, 1998, Planning Commission Meeting when
constraints, drainage and access (per record);
the drainage easement on the adjacent property; clarified, fo~
the development between September 2, 1998, and
addressed; and advised that staff is recommending de
nt that the Planning
1998,
~mmission ~)~),~ ~L~1
noting that the project has been continued three times since
presented; clarified that staffs concems are, as follows: site
six (6) letters in opposition to the project and one fax regarding
.=r Soltysiak, that although there was initial progress made on
~mentioned issues of concem have not been adequately
Ms. Jeannine Paul, representing the applicant,into the record (per agenda material) a letter from Mr. Peruchetti
requesting approval of the project, and drainage, grading, and lot size.
For Commissioner Naggar, Mr. Kevin the applicant, noted that there are no exis code violations on the property.
Chairwoman Slaven closed the p~ hearing.
· · .... - ' ' ' . - 79
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-045
A R OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICA ON NO.
P 7-0079 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28257) TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.85 ACRE INTO FOUR (4) PA ELS
OCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN LA PRIMAVERA AND SHOWALTER ROAD, D
i a i ot fl imous
5. Planning AI31~lication No. PA97-0237 (General Amendment and Zone Change)
Request to amend the General Plan designation for the site from Office and Neighborhood Commercial
to Neighborhood Commercial, in accordance with Exhibit A; and to change the Zoning Map for the site
from Professional Office and Neighborhood Commercial to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-1)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), highlighting the modifications, as follows: 1)
to amend the General Plan designation, and 2) to modify the Zoning Map facilitating permitted uses more compatible
with the area; and with regard to traffic, noted that the proposal would have no negative impact.
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified, for Commissioner Webster, page 27, section B-1 (of record) that the
Circulation Element doesn't address extending Jedediah Smith Road to the area of discussion, noting that a portion of
the property is currently being used for drainage facilities and a MWD (Metropolitan Water District) easement; and
advised that the existing right-of-way would not be used for access to the properties in the existing Neighborhood
Commercial Zone, due to the potential use of the right-of-way to address drainage issues.
Chairwoman Slaven, echoed by Commissioner Guerdero, commended Planning Staff on their efforts associated wLf~.,l
the proposal. regmIp.~.,e.~n
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the owners of two of the parcels, relayed concurrence with staff's
regarding the proposed changes; requested a modification in the addition of permitted uses (of record), as follows: page
17, Animal hospitals, page 19, Carpet and rug cleaning, and page 21, Health and exercise dubs (less than 5,000 square
feet); noted, for Commissioner Webster, with regard to Jedediah Smith Road, that the drainage channel exists primarily
on the east half of the right-of-way; advised that the request for vacating the area is in abeyance with the City until the
ultimate resolution of the drainage issue is determined; noted that the area would be inappropriate for access to the
property due to the fiat angle; for Mr. Webster, noted that the modification of additional permitted uses could be
conditionally permitted; and for Chairwoman Slaven, provided the rationale for the request to modify the permitted uses
was to broaden the zone with compatible uses.
For Commissioner Guerdero, Senior Planner Hogan noted that staff was agreeable to the requested modification of the
permitted uses.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for PA97-0237; and
adopt Resolution No. 98-046 recommending approval of PA97-0237 (General Plan, Zoning Map, and Development Code
Amendments) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, amended as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP ON
THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON
ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION PA97-0237) AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
950-110-018, 019, 020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH 17.22.108 TO
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
Add the followin,cl conditional permitted uses:
page 17, Animal hospital
- page 19, Carpet and rug cleaning
- page 21, Health and exemise clubs (less than 5,000 square feet)
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 7:24 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:31 P.M.
Plannin~ A~lication No. PA98-0397 (Chanc~e of Zonc) and PA08-03978 (Tontativc Tract Map 28810)
Request to subdivide 7.31 acres into 78 single family detached dwellings and two open space/park lots
~hin a planned development overlay district,
It is ed by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the req
Commissioner Webster advised
meeting at 7:31 P.M.
he would be abstaining with regard to this Agen
and therefore left the
By way of color renderings, nders presented the staff re enda material), highlighting site
design, access, traffic, landscaping and commended s work on the project; advised that
a condition, with regard to the Change of noted in .morandum, dated December 2, 1998, per
supplemental agenda material) be added, ant that submittal to the Fire Prevention Bureau,
be deleted.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant,
modification to the conditions; thanked and
fencing (constructed of wood and three or fc in height)
clarified that the proposed access will pro,for adequate stacking;
will be gated, facilitating the street.
with staffs recommendation, regarding the
Commissioner Naggar, noted that the front
le renderings is an architectural feature;
~airwoman Slaven, noted that the entry
Mr. Edc C. Curson, 29976 Via
generated by the project.
Del Sol, expressed concem with regard to the
traffic, which could be
Mr. Leon Lies, 299 Puesta Del Sol, voiced his concems, as follows: safety, traffic, access~nly one point of
entrance; with relayed concern with regard to traffic, noise, and open trenches;disapproval
of the power poles that are currently aboveground. Mr. Lies commended the reductionfits in the
propos project.
~mnoted, for Mr. Lies, that the power poles will be installed underground.
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
COMPARISON OF PERMITTED USES
\\TEMEC FS 201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
29
COMPARISON LIST OF PERMITTED USES
Description of Use NC
A
Adult business [] []subject to Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula
Municipal Code
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less C P
than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios
P
(greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Airports -
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities C
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) C
Alcoholic beverage sales C~ C~
Ambulance services P
Animal hospital (indoor only) P
Antique restoration C
Antique sales P P
Apparel and accessory shops P P
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P P
Arcades (pinball and video games) C
Art supply stores P P
Auction houses P
Auditoriums and conference facilities C
Automobile dealers (new and used) C
Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs P
Automobile sales (brokerage) showroom only (new and used) no
outdoor display P
Automobile repair services P
Automobile rental P
Automobile painting and body shop C
Automotive parts sales P P
Automobile salvage yards/impound yards
Automobile service stations with or without an automated car
P
wash
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine with or _ C~
without an automated car wash
B
Bakery goods distribution - P
Bakery retail P P
Bakery wholesale - P
\\TEMEC_FS20'I\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC3 .doc 30
PROPOSED
SC PDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Description of Use
Banks and financial institutions
Barber and beauty shops
Bed and breakfast
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services)
Billlard parlor/poolhall
Binding of books and similar publications
Blood bank
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services
Bookstores
Bowling alley
Building material sales
Butcher shop
C
Cabinet shop
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs)
Candy/confectionery sales
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning
Catering services
Clothing sales
Coins, purchase and sales
Cold storage facilities
Communications and microwave installations2
Communications equipment sales
Community care facilities
Computer sales and service
Congregate care housing for the elderly
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market
Costume rentals
Crematoriums
Cutlery
D
Data processing equipment and systems
Day care centers
Delicatessen
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc 31
NC
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
SC
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
C
C
P
P
P
P
C
P
PROPOSED
PDO-1
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
05
P
P
P
C5
C5
C
P
P
P
C
P
Description of Use
Discount/department store
Distribution facility
Drug store/pharmacy
Dry cleaners
Dry cleaning plant
E
Emergency shelters
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage)
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales
Financial, insurance, real estate offices
Fire and police stations
Floor covering sales
Florist shop
Food processing
Fortunetelling, spiritualism, or similar activity
Freight terminals
Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.
Glass and mirrors, retail sales
Governmental offices less than 5,000 sq. ft.
Grocery store, retail
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales
H
Hardware stores
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ~.)
Health food store
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
32
NC
C
P
P
C
P
SC
P
C
P
P
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
PROPOSED
PDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
(2;5
P
P
Description of Use
NC
Health care facility P
Heliports -
Hobby supply shop P
Home and business maintenance service -
Hospitals -
Hotels/motels -
I
Ice cream parlor P
Impound yard -
Interior decorating service P
J
Junk or salvage yard I '
K
Kennel I '
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers -
Laundromat P
Laundry service (commercial) -
Libraries, museums and galleries (private) -
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores
Lithographic service
Locksmith P
M
Machine shop
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses P
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
following:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and
fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no outside storage),
such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive
manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do not
involve frequent truck traffic.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFR PT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
33
i-P
SC
P
P
C
P
P
I C
P
P
C
C
P
P
PROPOSED
PDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
Description of Use NC SC
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, -
treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require
frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items.
Wholesating, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building,
freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage
and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or
semirefined products requiring further processing or
manufacturing, and outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage -
Massage P P
Medical equipment sales/rental P P
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C C
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse4 P
Mobilehome sales and service P
Motion picture studio P
Motorcycle sales and service P
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio C
N
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club C
Nurseries (retail) - P
Nursing homes/convalescent homes C C
O
Office equipment/supplies, sales/services C P
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater
- C
than 50,000 sq. ~.
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft.,
including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, p p
veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate,
insurance
P
Paint and wallpaper stores P
Parcel delivery services P P
Parking lots and parking structures C
Pawnshop P
Personal service shops P p
Pest control services C
~>et grooming/pet shop ...... P P
PROPOSED
PDO-1
P
P
C
C5
P
P)
P
P
R :\STAFFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
34
Description of Use
Photographic studio
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities
Commission)
Q
Reserved
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices
Radio/television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed
building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard
Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without a daycare or private school
Religious institution, with a private school
Religious institution, with a daycare
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a
commercial or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the
business)
Residential, multiple-family housing
Restaurant, drive-in/fast food
Restaurants and other eating establishments
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square
footage in BP and LI)
Rooming and boarding houses
S
Scale, public
Schools, business and professional
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12)
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories
FSenior citi;;'e'~ h~usin~(s~e a~o congregate cam) .....
R :\STA FFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
35
PROPOSED
NC SC PDO-1
P P P
C Cs
P P P
p -
P P P
C
C
C
P P
C -
C C
C C~
C5
C C
C C
C C
C C C
P
C
P
C
C
P
Description of Use
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports and recreational facilities
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building
Swap Meet, outside
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales
T
Tailor shop
Taxi or limousine service
Tile sales
Tobacco shop
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck rental (no sales or service)
TV/VCR repair
U
Upholstery shop
V
Vending machine sales and service
W
Ware ho u s ing/distri bution
Watch repair
Wedding chapels
Welding shop
Welding supply and service (enclosed)
Y
Reserved
Z
Reserved
NC SC
C C
- p
P
P
P
C P
C
P P
cl
p II
The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G), special standards for the sale of
alcoholic beverages.
Subject to citywide antenna standards.
See Section 17.08.050.(E), special standards for indoor swap meets.
See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse
facilities.
Subject to the special setback provisions contained in Section 17.22.108.
PROPOSED
PDO-1
P
P
P
P
P
C5
P
P
P
P
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97 ,CC '1 .doc
36
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRPT\237pa97.CC1 .doc
37
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
o
o
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
ProjectTitle:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Proposed General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose approval
is required:
Planning Application No. PA97-0237
(General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
CA 92590
Carole K. Donahoe, AICP
(909) 694-6400
South of State Highway 79 South, east of Pala Road
City-Initiated - City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
Office and Neighborhood Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial and Service Commercial
Professional Office and Neighborhood Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial and Service Commercial
Cleanup General Plan Amendment changing the
designation from Office and Neighborhood Commercial to
Neighborhood Commercial and Service Commercial; and
Zone Change changing the zoning from Professional Office
and Neighborhood Commercial to Neighborhood
Commercial and Service Commercial.
Vacant properties and flood control facilities to the north
and east; Riverwalk subdivision to the east; Pala Road,
Homes by the Green and Rainbow Canyon subdivision to
the south and west.
Fire Department, Health Department, Temecula Police
DeparUnent, Eastem Municipal Water District, Rancho
California Water District, Riverside County Flood Control,
Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas
Company, General Telephone
R:\CEQAX237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 1
12.
Speci~city of Environmental Review:
The project is a general plan amendment and zone change
and no detailed development proposals have been submitted
to the City, no project-level evaluation of the potential
environmental impacts is possible. Section 15 146 of the
CEQA Guidelines states that the specificity and detail of
environmental analysis should be similar to the detail and
specificity of the project. Since the project is a general plan
amendment/zone change within commercial land use
designations of the general plan, only a general plan level of
evaluation is possible. However, in an effort to provide as
much information as possible, some additional evaluation
has been provided. Any mitigation measures identified in
this document will be implemented when detailed
development proposals are available.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ]
[ ] Population and Housing [ ]
[X] Geologic Problems [ ]
[X] Water [ ]
[ ] Air Quality [X]
[X] Transportation/Circulation [X]
[ ] Biological Resources [ ]
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ]
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[]
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
[xl
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[1
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[]
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated."
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
R:\CEQAX237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 2
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a.Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cnmulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6, Source 4)
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
from excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
h. Expansive soils?
I. Unique geologic or physical features?
Potentially
Significant
[]
[]
[]
[l
[]
[l
[l
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[l
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
Significant
[l
[]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
NO
[]
[xl
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
R:\CEQAx237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 3
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and mount of surface rimoff?
b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as ~ooding? (Source I, Figure 7-3, Page 7-10
and Figure 7-4, Page 7-12; Source 4)
c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)7
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements7
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability7
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality7
I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies7
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (Source 1, Page 2-29)
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c.Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)? ( )
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( )
R:\CEQAL237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 4
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[l
ix]
[x]
[]
[l
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[1
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
NO
[]
[]
[l
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[]
[x]
ix]
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) [ ]
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) [ ]
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) [ ]
g. Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? ( ) [ ]
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including)
but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? ( ) [ ]
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) [ ]
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) [ ]
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)? ( ) [ ]
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [ ]
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted cncrgy conservation plans? [ ]
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? [ ]
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future valuc to the region and the residents
of the State? [ ]
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. A risk of accidental explosion or rclcasc of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pcsticidcs,
chemical or radiation)? [ ]
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? [ ]
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? [ ]
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards? [ ]
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? [ ]
R:\CEQAX237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 5
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Ix]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Significant
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[1
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
[]
[x]
[x]
[]
ix]
Ix]
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
10. NOISE. Would the proposal resuR in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels? (Source 1, Page 8-9)
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental services?
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 2, Figure 55,
Page 280)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[1
[1
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[xl
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
NO
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[:x]
[x]
[:x]
[x]
[]
R:\CEQAN237PA97.IES 12/10/97 cd 6
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless
Significant Mitigation
b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Figure 56,
Page 283; Source 5)
[1 [x] [] []
[] [] [] [~
c. Affect historical resources? (Source 1, Page 281; Source 6)
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( )
[] [] [] [~
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area? ( )
[] [x] [] []
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities? ( )
[] [] [] [~
[1 [1 [] [~
b. Affect existing recreational oppommities? ( )
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
[] [] [] [~
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
[] [] [] [~
Does the project have impacts that area individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? CCumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects).
[] [] [] [~
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
[1 [] [] [~
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. Parcel Map No. 11984
5. Extended Phase I Survey of CA-RIV-4707/H for the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge, January 1997
6. Historic Property Survey Report for the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge, February 1997
R:\CEQAX237PA97.IES 12/10/97 cd 7
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Land Use and Planning
la, c
The project is a general plan amendment and zone change from existing commercial land use designations.
The environmental impact of the proposed general plan designation and proposed zoning is expected to be less
than significant because Neighborhood Commercial zoning already covers a portion of the site, and is
proposed to extend along Pala Road only, up to approximately 150 feet from the south property line into the
site. Neighborhood Commercial uses already exist on two parcels, and extending such uses along Pala Road
to the other two parcels would have less than significant impacts. Service Commercial zoning is proposed for
the interior portions of the site, behind the Neighborhood Commercial zone. This area backs up to flood
control facilities on two sides, and will take access across the Neighborhood Commercial uses. The site is
crisscrossed with building restrictive easements, a fault line, water course and flood plain. While the Service
Commercial zone may allow more intense commercial uses relative to Neighborhood Commercial and
Professional Office zones, habitable buildings will be severely limited to only a few locations on the site.
There will be limited, if any, environmental effects due to the limited ability to develop the site.
Farmland of Local Importance has been identified to the north and south, areas upon which flood control
facilities exist. Fanning does not currently exist in the vicinity, which has been developed with single family
homes, golf course facilities and commercial uses. The areas designated as farmland are not within an existing
Williamson Act Contract, and it is unlikely that farming operations would commence in the future. The effect
of the proposed change in land use designation and zoning is less than significant upon agricultural resources
or operations.
le
Established communities exist to the east across flood control facilities, and to the south across Pala Road.
However, neither of these communities were designed to expand across to the subject site. Commercial
designations already exist on the site. The proposed change in designation and zoning does not disrupt the
pattern or physical arrangement of communities.
Population and Housing
2a
There will be an increase in the intensity of commercial uses in those areas proposed for Service Commercial
zoning. However, the proposal will not add any more square footage of commercial uses than what was
anticipated under existing commercial land use designations. The impact to local population projections is
considered to be less than significant.
Geologic Problems
3a,b,c,e,
f,g,h
Development of the site may have a significant impact on people involving seismic ground shaking seismic
ground failure (including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils. The site is located in Southern California, an area which is
seismically active. The City's General Plan identifies two active faults in the vicinity, the Wildomar Fault and
the Wolf Valley Fault. Parcel Map No. 11984, subdividing the site into four parcels in 1979, identifies a fault
line on the site approximately 200 feet from Pala Road. However, according the Riverside County Geologist,
subsequent geologic studies should be reviewed to determine the validity of the Map findings.
Potential impacts will be mitigated by compliance with State of California Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone
development criteria and construction in accordance with the Uniform Building Code standards. A soils report
shall be a requirement of development and shall contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil which
will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure
(including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading
or fill and expansive soils. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for
development projects at the site. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be
mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. At~er mitigation measures are
performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\CEQAX237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd g
Water
4a
Development of the site may result in changes in absorption rates, drainage paRems and the rate and mount of
surface runoff should development occur as a result of the land use designation and zone change. However,
because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be
limited. The impact as a result of the change in land use designations is considered less than significant.
4b
The General Plan identifies a portion of the site as being within the 100 year flood boundary of Temecula
Creek. Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel No. 060742-0010-B identifies all but a small portion at the southern
end of the site as being within Zone AlE, and a floodway on the northern one half. Parcel Map No. 11984
recorded in 1979 conin-ms the limit of the 100 year flood plain traversing the site approximately in half. The
Map also identifies a watercourse on the north portion of Parcel 4. Flood control easements already exist
along Temecula Creek. As a condition of the underlying parcel map, the watercourse shall be kept free of all
buildings and obstructions in order to convey flood flows. The flood plain shall be kept free of all new
dwelling units. Given these mitigation measures already in place at the site, the project is expected to have
less than significant impact exposing people or property to water related hazards.
4c
Development of the site may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and
alteration of surface water quality. Development will be required to comply with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. By this
compliance, any potential impacts of development can be mitigated to a level less than significant.
4d,e
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant impact in changes to the amount
of surface water in any water body or impact currents, or impact the course or direction of water movements.
Because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be
limited. The impact as a result of the change in land use designations is considered less than significant.
4f-h
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant change in the quantity and
quality of ground waters. Because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and flood plain,
development is anticipated to be limited. The impact as a result of the change in land use designations is
considered less than significant.
4i
The proposed change in land use designations will have a less than significant impact in the reduction in the
amount of ground water otherwise available for public water supplies. Because of the restrictive easements,
fault line, water course and flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited. The impact as a result of the
change in land use designations is considered less than significant.
Air Quality
5a
The proposed change in land use designation will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation. Because of the restrictive easements, fault line, water course and
flood plain, development is anticipated to be limited and well below target floor area ratios of any commercial
zone. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5b,d
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no sensitive receptors in proximity to
the project. According to the City's Development Code, standards with regards to the generation of
particulate matter, smoke, dust, dirt, ash, odors, toxics and other noxious matter apply equally to all
commercial zones.
5c
The proposed change in land use designation will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transportation/Circulation
6.a.
The proposal is located in an area where areawide traffic and circulation improvements have not yet been
completed and where occasional traffic congestion has been identified. Area traffic congestion is expected to
significantly improve when these scheduled improvements have been completed. This proposal would shift
the General Plan and Zoning designations from one commercial designation to another. However, it is
R:\CEQAX237PA97.IES 12/10/97 cd 9
anticipated that because of the limited nature of future development, most sites are significantly constrained
with utility easements and environmental site limitations, that a less than significant impact upon traffic is
anticipated. The project will have a less than significant impact upon increased vehicle trips or traffic
congestion.
6d.
In addition, the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge Improvement Project will widen Pala Road liom two to
four lanes, replace the existing bridge, and improve mining movements at the intersection of State Highway 79
South. This project is anticipated to improve traffic flow and safety in this area. Of the three alternative
alignments for the Improvement Project, Alternative 1A was chosen based on engineering, safety
considerations, and environmental constraints. The Bridge Improvement Project is scheduled for construction
in early 1998. The project will have a less than significant impact upon increased vehicle trips or traffic
congestion.
Future development will be conditioned to provide sufficient parking capacity in accordance with the City' s
Development Code. With proper mitigation measures, future development is not anticipated to cause
significant impacts as a result of this project.
Biological Resources
7.all
The site is located adjacent to Temecula Creek and includes four partially disturbed properties that range tirom
mostly developed to undeveloped. The two middle parcels have been mostly developed. The most southerly
parcel is vacant and covered by non-native grass and tree species. The most northerly parcel may contain
some wetland species. However, this site will also be substantively impacted by the relocation and
replacement of the Pala Road Bridge. According to the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge Improvement
Project Wetland Mitigation Plan, both temporary and permanent impacts of the Bridge Improvement Project
have been mitigated as part of that project. Any additional, and relatively minor, impacts will be addressed
when specific development proposals are submitted. The future development proposals will receive
appropriately detailed environmental review. As a result, no additional impacts are anticipated at this time.
Energy and Mineral Resources
8,a.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project will be
reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation during the plan check
stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable hws. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful
and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and in the
depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber)
and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed
development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
8.e.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future
value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would be of future value
to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Hazards
9.a.
The project will not result in a significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous
substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. While
some retail uses may have the potential to sell hazardous substances, they are regulated by beth the Fire
Department and the Department of Environmental Health. Future development must receive clearance from
the Department of Environmental Health prior to any plan check submittal. Future development must
receive clearance from the Fire Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. This applies to
storage and use of hazardous materials. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\CEQA',237PA97.1ES 12/10/97cd 10
9.b.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The
subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. The project will take
access from maintained streets and will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency
evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.c.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hAT~rd. The project will
be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check stage. No permits will be
issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. Reference response 9.a. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health hazards are
known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
9.e.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush, grass, or trees.
The project is in an area of existing uses and proposed commercial uses. The project is not located within
or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is partially
vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during construction
phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long nm. However, the project site is adjacent to
Pala Road, designated as a six-lane urban arterial roadway. Ambient noise levels 100 feet from centerline
are 61.9 to 62.6 CNEL. According to the City's General Plan, it is appropriate to place insensitive land
uses such as commercial adjacent to noise generators such as highways. Long-term noise generated by this
project would be similar to existing and proposed uses in the area. Noise impacts are anticipated to be less
than significant as a result of this project in either the short or long-term.
10.b.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase (short nm).
Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is
considered very annoying and can cause heating damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise
will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. There will be no long-term
exposure of people to noise. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Public Services
11.a,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police
protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection; however, it will
conlribute its fair share to the cost of maintenance of service provision from these entities. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
ll.c.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities.
The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula and
therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
ll.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads.
Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of
Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result
of development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline
Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses.
ll.e.
The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\CEQA~237PA97.1ES 12/10/97 cd 1 ]
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to power or natural
gas. These systems are cun-ently being delivered in proximity to the site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to communication
systems (reference response No. 12. a. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.c.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional
water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer
systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have
indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further
states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p.
40)." It is anticipated that the proposal to change the designation from Office to Commercial, and the limited
nature of future development under this designation, would not significantly increase the demand for systems
or supplies. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.e.
Future development may require additional storm water drainage facilities onsite. However, because this
project is a change in General Plan and Zoning designations from one commercial category to another, no
specific development proposals are being proposed at this time. Any specific development proposal would
receive an appropriately detailed environmental review. No significant impacts are anticipated at this time.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal
systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through
participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional
water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
13.a.
The City does not have any designated scenic highways. However, future developments on the site will be
reviewed to ensure that project design provides appropriate aesthetic benefits in accordance with the City's
Development Cede and Design Guidelines. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b.
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project, as proposed, is intended to
encourage neighborhood commercial uses and appearance along Pala Road, and would locate more intense
service commercial uses on the interior portion of the site. It is anticipated that this layout will require a more
neighborhood character in terms of building scale and design and in terms of landscaping adjacent to Pala
Road to make future development more compatible with the surrounding area. As a result, no significant
impacts are anticipated.
13.c.
The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will produce and result
in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new light sources. All light and glare has the
potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. Future development will be conditioned to be consistent
with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With mitigation measures no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
14.b.
The General Plan identifies a sensitive archaeological area at the intersection of State Highway 79 South and
Pala Road, which may extend to the subject site. An Extended Phase I (XphI) Investigation was performed
dated January 1997 for the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge confirming the location of two potential
R:\CEQAX237PA97.IES 12/10/97 cd ] 2
concentrations of artifacts in close proximity to State Highway 79. The also study indicated that, expect for
one partially disturbed site, the southerly properties did not have any identified significant cultural deposits.
The results of the investigation recommended further studies. A Phase II Evaluation of Archaeological Site
CA-RIV-4707/H was prepared in January 1997 which concluded that both the historic component and
prehistoric components were not eligible for the National Register. Due to the potential for additional deposits
in the area, future development of the proposed site will be required to continue the investigation for artifacts
in site specific areas. The potential for future significant impacts will be determined and fully mitigated when
future development proposals are considered.
14.c.
The project will not have an impact on historical resources. As noted in the Historic Property Survey Report
completed for the Temecula Creek (Pala Road) Bridge in February 1997, properties in the area of the Pala
Road Bridge were determined ineligible for inclusion in the National Register or the California Register of
Historic Resources, and no locally designated landmarks were identified. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values. Reference response 14.b,c. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e. The project may restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. See Response 14.b.
Recreation
15.a,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks
or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to
the City of Temecula. The same is tree for the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or
opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\CEQAX237PA97.1ES 12/10/97cd
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
EXHIBITS
R :\STA FFRPT\237pa97 .CC 1 .doc
38
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NUMBER: PA97-0237
EXHIBIT- A
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE - JNAUARY 12, 1999
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
5P
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
VL
t
"HTC'
OS
LM
ITEM
25
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
Award of Construction Contract for Mall Improvements for Ynez Road -
Winchester Road to Overland Drive and Winchester Road-Ynez to Margarita
Road - Project No. PW97-06
PREPARED BY:
William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Receive an oral report on the bids received January 7, 1999.
Award a construction contract for Ynez Road -Winchester Road to Overland Drive and
Winchester Road-Ynez to Margarita Road - Project No. PW97-06 and authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract.
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: This project will provide deceleration lanes, median modifications, left-turn
lanes, bus turnouts, new traffic signals and traffic signal modifications on Ynez Road and Winchester
Road. The construction will include roadway widening, curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drains, one
(1) new traffic signal on Winchester, one (1) new traffic signal on Ynez Road, and modifications to
existing traffic signals at Ynez and Winchester Roads. These improvements will fulfill a portion of
our Mall development agreement obligations. The plans and specifications are available for
inspection in the office of the Director of Public Works. The engineer's construction estimate for this
project is $1,200,000.00.
FISCALIMPACT:
The Promenade Mall Roadway Improvement Project, Project No. PW97-06, is funded by
Development Impact Fees. Adequate funds are available for this work in Account No. 210-165-683-
5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Contract Form
R:\AGDRPT\99\0112\PW97-06.AWD .DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-06
WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the day of , 19 , by
and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
· hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-06, WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications (1995 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative
Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General
Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-06.
WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-06. WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
R: \CIP\PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID 1 -DOC. CTY
CONTRACT CA-1
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-06, WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTDR agrees
to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of:
DOLLARS and
CENTS ($ ), the total amount of the
base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Eighty (80) working
days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the
City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes
or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the
City Council.
PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the
City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be
used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
R:\CIP%PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-06\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-2
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according
to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the
thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final
payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty
(60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year
Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the
CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is
more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
~25,000- ~75,000
$75,000- ~500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1 ,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
R:\CII~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-3
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy
of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of ~25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and
all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY
shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents,
or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment
with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
R:\CII~Pl:iOJECTS\PW97\PW97-06\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-4
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State
of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this
Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties
concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled
to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is
in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336,
as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
R:\CIP~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Name
Address
City
Phone
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID 1 -DOG. CTY
CONTRACT CA-6
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
FOR
AGENDA ITEM NO. 25
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
2::~, Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 12, 1999
SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for Winchester Road and
Ynez Road Street Widening, Project No. PW97-06
PREPARED BY: , jJ~TLwilliam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
0L)NWVard B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Award a contract for the construction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road Street Widening,
Project No. PW 97-06, to Riverside Construction Company in the amount of $999,999.00.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount
of $99,999.90, which is equal to10% of the contract amount.
3. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $25,900.00 for Caltrans
inspection costs per the encroachment permit submitted to the City on January 5, 1999.
BACKGROUND: The engineer's estimate for this project is $1,250,000.00.
Twelve (12) bids for the project were publicly opened on January 7, 1999. The results are as
follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ................................................... $ 999,999.00
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC ................................................... $1,081,047.00
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ..........................................................................$1,076,909.45
VANCE CORPORATION .............................................................................$1,091,833.00
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION ..................................... $1,115,587.90
GODOT ENTERPRISES, INC ......................................................................$1,132,387.65
MATICH CORPORATION ............................................................................$1,149,748.00
WI ER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION ................................................... $1,160,287.70
AMAN ENVIROMENTAL CONSTRUCTION ................................................. $1,218,955.00
R:~AGDRPT\99\0112\PW97-O6.SUP/wbm
10.
11.
12.
ACE ENGINEERING, INC ............................................................................$1,220,594.00
E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC ........................................ $1,226,682.00
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ..................................................... $1,258,941.00
We have reviewed the bid proposal from Riverside Construction Company and found it to be
acceptable. Riverside Construction Company has performed satisfactory for the City of Temecula
on both Winchester Road Overpass Widening and Rancho California Road Overpass Widening
Projects.
The construction schedule for this project is 80 working days. Construction is expected to begin in
March 1999.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Promenade Mall Roadway Improvement Project, Project No. PW97-06,
is funded by Development Impact Fees. Adequate funds are available for this work in Account No.
210-165-683-5804.
ATTACHMENTS: Contract
R:\AGDRPT\99\O 112\PW97-06 .SUP/wbm
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-06
WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 12th day of January, 1999, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and RIVERSIDE
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1,8,
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-06, WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications (1995 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative
Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General
Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-06,
WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-06, WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-1
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-06, WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD STREET WIDENING
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: NINE HUNDRED
NINTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINTY NINE DOLLARS 00/100 CENTS
($999,999.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Eighty (80) working
days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the
City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes
or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the
City Council.
PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the
City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be
used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according
R:\CIF~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-2
to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the
thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final
payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty
(60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year
Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the
CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
De
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is
more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
~25,000- ~75,000
~75,000-~500,000
Over ~500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
~2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of ~75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
R:\CIF~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID1 -DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-3
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy
of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. ALl work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and
all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY
shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents,
or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment
with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
R: \CIF~PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID 1 -DOC. CTY
CONTRACT CA-4
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State
of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this
Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties
concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled
to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is
in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336,
as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
R: \CIP%PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-O6\BID 1 -DOC. CTY
CONTRACT CA-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Name Riverside Construction Company
Address 111 Main St. (PC Box 1146)
City Riverside, CA
Phone (909) 682-8308
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW97\PW97-06\BID1 *DOC.CTY
CONTRACT CA-6
ITEM
26
APPROVAL "~
TY ATTORNEY
RECTOR OF FINANCE
i!TY MANAGER ,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
T0:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
J seph Kjcak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
nuary 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
Award of Construction Contract for Margadta Road, Overland Ddve, and Long
Canyon Creek Improvements - Project No. PW97-07
PREPARED BY:
William G. Hughes, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Receive an oral repod on the bids received January 7, 1999
Award a construction contract for Margadta Road, Ovedand Drive, and Long Canyon Creek
Improvements - Project No. PW97-07
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: This project will widen Margadta Road from Winchester Road to Overland
Ddve to four (4) lanes, construct Ovedand Drive to four (4) lanes from Ynez Road to Margarita Road,
re-grade Long Canyon Wash from Margadta Road to Ynez Road and construct the Long Canyon
Creek Detention Basin on the east side of Margadta Road between Solana Way and North General
Kearny Road. The project will include re-grading of Long Canyon Wash, storm drains, new box
culverts under Margarita Road and Ovedand Drive, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lights, new
pavement sections, and landscaped median islands on Margadta Road. These improvements will
fulfill a portion of our Mall development agreement obligations. The plans and specifications are
available for inspection in the office of the Director of Public Works. The engineers construction
estimate for this project is $3,250,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Mall Roadway Improvement Projects, Project No. PW97-07, are funded
by Development Impact Fees and Capital Project Reserves, It appears that additional funding may
be required depending upon bids received. A supplemental report will be delivered to the City
Council pdor to the City Council meeting and will address the fiscal impact based upon the bids
received.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Contract Form
R:UkGDRPT\99'~0112~P~NI!?-07,AWD.DOCte~p
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-07
MARGARITA ROAD / OVERLAND DRIVE
AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the day of ,19
by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereina~er referred to as "CITY", anc~
, hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA
ROAD I OVERLAND DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of Califomia
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD / OVERLAND
DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Ovedand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Sped~cations will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA
ROAD I OVERLAND DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications (Green Book) and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu
of, such conflicting portions.
CONTRACT CA-1
o
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD / OVERLAND DRIVE
AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be fumished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the Special Provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of:
DOLLARS and
the total amount of the base bid.
CENTS ($ ),
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a pedod not to exceed EIGHTY THREE (83)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall
not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by wdtten order, changes
or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the
City Council.
PAYMENTS.
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the
City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall
be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according
to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the
thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final
CONTRACT CA-2
payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty
(60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year
Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the
CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
E,
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is
more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount in
excess of $500,000
o
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from
any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be
granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable
delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR
including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any
such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
CONTRACT CA-3
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy
of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776,
1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the
provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in
preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and
all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY
shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents,
or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment
with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project.
CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the
CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit
covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed
under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
CONTRACT CA-4
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance
of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other pdor inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State
of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this
Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties
concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled
to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is
in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as
amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
CONTRACT CA-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Name
Address
City
Phone
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CAo6
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
FOR
AGENDA ITEM NO. 26
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA REPORT
TO: City ManagedCity Council
FROM: (:~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: January 12, 1999
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
Award of Construction Contract for Margadta Road, Overland Drive, and
Long Canyon Creek Improvements - Project No. PW97-07
RECO M M ENDATION:
1.
/l~:,')/t~Villiam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects
Iv-Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the construction of Margarita Road, Overland Ddve, and Long Canyon
Creek Project No. PW 97-07, to Riverside Construction Company in the amount of
$3,190,225.00.
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $319,022.50, which is equal to10% of the contract amount.
Authorize a transfer of $666,000.00 from Account No. 210-165-683-5804, $120,000.00 from
Account No. 210-165-696-5804, and $629,000.00 from Account No. 210-165-604-5804 to
Account No. 210-165-681-5804.
BACKGROUND: The engineer's estimate for this project is $3,250,000.00.
Fourteen (14) bids for the project were publicly opened on January 7, 1999. The results are as
follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY .................................................. $3,190,225.00
E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC ........................................ $3,264,947.45
VANCE CORPORATION .............................................................................$3,378,816.15
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ..................................................... $3,422,224.00
GODOT ENTERPRISES, INC ......................................................................$3,464,582.11
C.W. POSS, INC .........................................................................................$3,615,935.50
L.D. ANDERSON, INC .................................................................................$3,695,787.85
ACE ENGINEERING, INC ............................................................................$3,787,878.70
R:\AGDRPT\99\0112\PW97-06.SUP/wbm
9. WIER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION .......................................................... $3,789,251.93
10. SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION ........................................... $3,810,296.50
11. LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING, INC ..................................................................$3,867,788.24
12. D.W. POWEL CONSTRUCTION, INC .................................................................$3,891,845.00
13. MATICH CORPORATION ....................................................................................$4,024,147.10
14. GUENO DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ................................... $4,219,835.34
We have reviewed the bid proposal from Riverside Construction Company and found it to be
acceptable. Riverside Construction Company has performed satisfactory for the City of Temecula on
both Winchester Road Overpass Widening and Rancho California Road Overpass Widening Projects.
The construction schedule for this project is 90 working days. Construction is expected to begin in
February 1999.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works.
DISCUSSION: In order to complete this project, additional funds in the amount of $1,415,000.00
are required to be transferred into Account No. 210-165o681-5804. This budget transfer is due to the
fact that a portion of the originally budgeted funds ($3,780,000.00) were used to participate in the
construction of the westerly half of Margarita Road along the Spanos project North of Solana Way,
conversion of SCE overhead power lines to underground(Rule 20B), and the installation of the storm
drain system in Margarita Road. Of the total additional funds required, $666,000.00 is from the savings
on Project PW97-06, "Winchester and Ynez Road Street Widening", $120,000.00 from the savings in
the City's portion of the storm drain system though the mall site, and the balance of $629,000.00 is
proposed to be transferred from the savings in the Overland Drive Overcrossing project PW95-11.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Development impact
described above.
The Mall Roadway Improvement Project, Project No. PW97-07, is funded by
Fees and Capital Project Reserves. Additional funding will be required as
ATTACHMENTS: Contract
R:\AGDRPT',99/0112\PVVg?-O6.SUP/wbr'n
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW97-07
MARGARITA ROAD / OVERLAND DRIVE
AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 12th day of January, 1999, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereina~er referred to as "CITY", and RIVERSIDE
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereina~er named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA
ROAD / OVERLAND DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of Califomia
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD / OVERLAND
DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA
ROAD / OVERLAND DRIVE AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications (Green Book) and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu
of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
CONTRACT CA-1
,
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW97-07, MARGARITA ROAD I OVERLAND DRIVE
AND LONG CANYON WASH IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be fumished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the Special Provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: THREE
MILLION ONE HUNDRED NINTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS
and 00/100 CENTS ($3,190,225.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed NINTY (90) working
days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by wdtten order, changes
or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the
City Council.
PAYMENTS.
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the
City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall
be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according
to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the
thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final
payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty
(60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year
CONTRACT CA-2
Do
Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the
CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is
more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,O00- $75,0OO
$75,000- $500,OOO
Over$500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
18O days
18O days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount in
excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from
any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be
granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable
delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR
including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any
such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
CONTRACT CA-3
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy
of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776,
1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the
provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in
preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and
all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY
shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents,
or representatives with a view toward secudng this Contract or securing favorable treatment
with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project.
CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the
CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit
covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed
under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance
CONTRACT CA-4
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State
of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this
Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties
concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled
to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is
in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as
amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
CONTRACT CA-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Name Riverside Construction Company
Address 111 Main St. (PO Box 1146)
City Riverside, CA
Phone (909) 682-8308
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6
ITEM
27
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA~IC~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Susan W. Jones
~:~ity Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE:
January 12,1999
SUBJECT: Selection of City Council Committee Assignments
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Appoint a member of the City Council to serve on each of the following committees:
· Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
· Riverside Transit Agency
· WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Governments) Representative
· French Valley Airport Committee
· Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors
· Temecula/Murrieta Joint Transportation/Traffic Committee
Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following
Committees:
· Economic Development Committee
· Finance Committee
· Old Town Steering Committee
· Public Works/Facilities Committee
· Joint City Council/TVSD Committee
· Murrieta Creek Advisory Board - appoint one member and one alternate
· Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee
· Old Town Parking Incentives Ad Hoc Committee
· League of California Congress - Voting Delegates
· School Impact Mitigation Fees Ad Hoc Committee
· Riverside County Transportation Commission - appoint one member and one
alternate
· League of California Cities
Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City
Commissions and Committees and to the Pechanga Tribal Council.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council has established the policy of appointing one of its members to serve as liaison
to each of the City Commissions and Committees. This policy also included appointing
Councilmembers to serve as the Council's representatives to external organizations and on a
number of Council ad hoc subcommittees. Attached, for your convenience, is a list of the
Committee Assignments for 1998.
ATTACHMENTS: 1998 Committee Assignments List
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
1998 Committee Assi.clnments
Commission Liaison (One Member)
Community Services Commission:
Planning Commission:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
Redevelopment Advisory Committee:
Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison:
Library Task Force:
Jeff Stone
Jeff Comerchero
Ron Roberts
Karel Lindemans
Ron Roberts
Ron Roberrs, Jeff Stone
Representative Assignments (External Organizations)
French Valley Airport Committee:
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency:
Riverside Transit Agency Representative:
WRCOG Representative:
Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors:
Temecula/Murrieta Transportation/Traffic Committee:
Murrieta Creek Project Committee:
Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee:
Old Town Parking Incentives Ad Hoc Committee:
League of Calif Congress - Voting Delegates:
School Impact Mitigation Fees Ad Hoc Committee:
Riverside County Transportation Commission:
League of Calif Cities - Voting Delegates:
Jeff Stone
Steve Ford
Karel Lindemans
Ron Roberts
Jeff Comerchero
Steve Ford
Jeff Stone,(Altemate-Steve Ford)
Jeff Stone, Jeff Comerchero
Karel Lindemans, Steve Ford
Ron Roberts, Steve Ford
Ron Roberts, Jeff Stone
Ron Roberts,
(Alternate-Jeff Comerchero)
Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero
Council Committee Assignments (Two members) - Standing Committee, meetings must be
noticed at least 72 hours in advance.
Economic Development Committee:
Finance Committee:
Old Town Steering Committee:
Public Works/Facilities Committee:
Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee:
Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero
Karel Lindemans, Jeff Stone
Steve Ford, Karel Lindemans
Jeff Stone, Ron Roberts
Ron Roberts, Steve Ford
Council and Other Offices -
Mayor- Ron Roberts
Mayor Pro-Tem - Steven J. Ford
Temecula Community Services District
President - Jeff Stone
Vice President - Jeff Comerchero
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Chairperson - Karel Lindemans
Vice Chair - Steve Ford
Winchester Hills Financing Authority
Chairperson - Jeff Comerchero
Vice Chair- Steve Ford
Westside Improvement Authority
Chairperson - Steven J. Ford
Vice Chair - Jeff Comerchero
Temecula Industrial Development Agency
Chairperson - Ron Roberts
Vice Chair- Steve Ford
R:\LISTS\City Council 98 Comm Assignments.doc