The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About092716 CC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk(951)694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 27, 2016– 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:30 PM - The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: Conference with Legal Counsel—Pending Litigation. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to the following matter of pending litigation: Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1512880. Next in Order: Ordinance: 16-09 Resolution: 16-56 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Cadenza School of Music Invocation: To Be Announced Flag Salute: To Be Announced ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Achievement to Britney Abshire of Troop #1299 for Attaining Girl Scout Gold Award Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School for Earning the California Gold Ribbon Schools Award Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Temecula Dollars for Scholars (TDFS) Presentation of"Because Nice Matters Week in Temecula" Proclamation 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of September 13, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of September 13, 2016. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 2 4 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Michael Baker International for an Environmental Initial Study for Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Michael Baker International, in the amount of $5,655, for the preparation of an Environmental Initial Study for Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe, for a total agreement amount of$78,270.50. 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve additional work not to exceed the contingency amount of$7,115.50. 5 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Environmental Science Associates for the Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Old Town Boutique Hotel RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Environmental Science Associates, in the amount of $129,100, with a 10% contingency of $12,910, for a total agreement of $142,010, for the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Old Town Boutique Hotel. 6 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Riverside County Flood Control District and Frontier Communications to Place a Frontier Communications Utility Line Within City-Owned Property RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the three-way Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Riverside County Flood Control District and Frontier Communications to place a Frontier Communications utility line within City-owned property. 7 Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for 2016 Autumnfest Events RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the following 2016 Autumnfest Events: GREEK FESTIVAL VETERAN'S DAY PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 3 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 16-01 Resolution: CSD 16-05 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, McCracken, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 8 Approve the Action Minutes of September 13, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of September 13, 2016. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 11, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 4 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY— No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY— No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY— No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 9 Approve the Assessment of Fair Housing for the Community Development Block Grant Program RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING, WITH THE ADDITION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 10 Appoint Members to the Community Services Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council appoint Eric Levine and Eric Willis to the Community Services Commission and James (J.R.) Richardson and Bradley Sullivan to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. 11 Receive and File Preliminary Design Concepts for Founders Square and a Memorial in Honor of Jimmy Moore RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council receive and file preliminary design concepts for Founders Square and a memorial in honor of Jimmy Moore. 5 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 12 Community Development Department Monthly Report 13 Police Department Monthly Report 14 Public Works Department Monthly Report BOARD/COMMISSION REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 11, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information)will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda,will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,Temecula, 8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website—www.cityoftemecula.org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 6 PRESENTATIONS rjr The City of Temecula Certificate of A ch ievemen t The City Council of the City of Temecula commends the outstanding achievement of Britne A bsh ire AP, Of Troop #1299 We congratulate Britney for receiving the Girl Scout Gold Award, which is the highest achievement earned in Girl Scouting. We are proud of Britney's accomplishment and wish her continued success in her promising and bright future. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty-seventh day of September, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School The California Department of Education recognizes outstanding schools that demonstrate exemplary achievements in implementing state standards in priority areas through the California Gold Ribbon School Program. Schools applied for the award based on a model program or practice their school adopted incorporating standards-based activities, projects, strategies, and practices that can be replicated by other local educational agencies. Nearly 6,000 elementary schools were eligible to apply and 780 were honored. Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School implemented their model of Team Collaboration for Academic Excellence utilizing collaboration, creativity, communication, and critical thinking for students to achieve California standards. We congratulate Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School on receiving the California Gold Ribbon Schools Award and we are grateful for their many contributions preparing the youth in our community to succeed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- seventh day of September, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Temecula Dollarsfor Scholars Temecula Dollars for Scholars will be celebrating 30 years of providing scholarships for graduating seniors in the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Temecula Dollars for Scholars began in 1987 as Citizens' Scholarship Foundation of Temecula Valley. During that time, the organization has presented more than $2.8 million dollars to students and contributed countless hours of volunteer work to assist graduates in achieving their goals. We congratulate Temecula Dollars for Scholars on their upcoming 30th Anniversary. Temecula Dollars for Scholars has made a difference in the lives of countless students and their families and we are grateful for their commitment to a better future and a brighter, smarter tomorrow. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- seventh day of September, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk r ri. a r NOMINEES! I 1 Nil r- oil qq 9,0 The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is in strong support of Temecula Valley Unified School District's "Because Nice Matters"campaign of kindness and anti-bullying; and WHEREAS, "Because Nice Matters" is an important message to be addressed by all students in Temecula, as well as the citizenry at large. Everyone should make an effort to be nice to one another; and WHEREAS, "Because Nice Matters" includes an anti-bullying component that is critical to the excellent curriculum offered at TVUSD because no child should ever have to go to school preoccupied with worries of intimidation, fear and bullying; and all Temecula students who witness another being victimized or bullied should immediately report it; and WHEREAS, the TVUSD signature colors to raise awareness of the "Because Nice Matters" campaign that started at Great Oak High School implemented district-wide over several years are purple with black to symbolize the colors of internal bruising that occurs when someone is bullied; and WHEREAS,the last full week of September each year is officially called, "Because Nice Matters in Temecula Week". Students are asked to wear purple with black showing that being nice matters and to take a stand against bullying. On Friday of that week, everyone is asked to wear white to symbolize a new beginning, or fresh start in treating people with respect and kindness; and WHEREAS, this collaboration between the City and School District sends a powerful message throughout Temecula in terms of the notion that "nice" does matter not only among our student population but among citizens citywide. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Michael S. Naggar, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of September 26th to be "Because Nice Matters in Temecula Week" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-seventh day of September,2016. Michael S. Naggar,Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CONSENT Item No . 1 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No . 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 13, 2016– 7:00 PM 6:30 PM - The City Council convened in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: Conference with Legal Counsel—Pending Litigation. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to the following matter of pending litigation: Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1512880. At 6:30 PM Mayor Naggar called the City Council meeting to order and recessed to Closed Session to consider the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. The City Council meeting convened at 7:01 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Cadenza School of Music Invocation: Aaron Adams Flag Salute: Captain Hector Padilla ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Constitution Week Proclamation Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Gail Zigler Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Kathi Syers Introduction of Temecula Fire Chief Charlie Dehart Action Minutes 091316 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Todd Wiggins • Hector Padilla • Wayne Grajczyk • Sandra Cuellar • Wayne Hall CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of August 23, 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of August 23, 2016. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Action Minutes 091316 2 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2016. 5 Adopt Ordinance 16-08 Amending Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets (Second Reading) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 16-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS 6 Accept the Notice of Draft Amendments for the 2016 Conflict of Interest Code - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council accept the notice of draft amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code for the 2016 calendar year pursuant to Government Code 87306.5 and direct the City Clerk to publish the Notice of Intent. 7 Approve Meeting Schedule for City Council Meetings for the Months of November and December 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the meeting schedule rescheduling the November 8, 2016 and November 22, 2016 City Council meetings to November 15, 2016 and canceling the December 27, 2016 City Council Meeting. Action Minutes 091316 3 8 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Great Oak Academic Leadership Society for the Spirit Run for the ARTS 2016 (At the Request of the Economic Development Committee Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Great Oak Academic Leadership Society for city-support costs, in the amount of $300, and in-kind promotional services of$11,415, for the Spirit Run for the ARTS 2016. 9 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for the 2016 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show (At the Request of the Economic Development Committee Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for city-support costs, in the amount of $1,900, and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2016 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show. 10 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Programs of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for traumatic incident citizen support. 11 Approve the Purchase of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Annual Maintenance and Support Services for Tyler Technologies Suite of Products - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. Action Minutes 091316 4 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the purchase of the annual maintenance and support services for the Tyler Technologies Suite of products including the EnerGov Permitting System and Tyler Cashiering, in the amount not to exceed $86,096.20, for year three of the five-year agreement; 11.2 Approve the purchase of the Eden Systems Suite (Accounts Receivable, General Ledger/Accounts Payable, Fixed Assets, Purchasing and Requisitions, Budgeting, Project Accounting, and Human Resources), in an amount not to exceed $44,973.61. 12 Approve City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2015-16 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) WITH THE ADDITION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE REPORT TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) 13 Approve the Eleventh Amendment to the Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. for Design of Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Edwards, McCracken, Rahn and Naggar. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the Eleventh Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Engineer Services with Michael Baker International, Inc. for Design of Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, increasing the contingency amount by $55,000; 13.2 Increase the City Manager's authority to approve Extra Work Authorizations by $55,000. Action Minutes 091316 5 14 Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for the Health & Community Resource Fair for September 24, 2016— Receive and file. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporary close certain streets for the following special event in Old Town: HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR RECESS At 7:53 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:56 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL BOARD/COMMISSION REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson reported there were no reportable actions in regards to the Closed Session items. ADJOURNMENT At 8:00 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, September 27, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 091316 6 Item No . 3 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Pam Espinoza, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,295,609.50 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of September, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 09/01/2016 TOTAL CHECK RUN $ 841,263.47 09/08/2016 TOTAL CHECK RUN 1,982,931.55 09/08/2016 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 471,414.48 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09/27/2016 COUNCIL MEETING: $3,295,609.50 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 1,772,499.45 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION&GOVERNMENT 319.00 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 1,921.16 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 257.15 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,852.93 170 MEASURE A FUND 50.00 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 139,832.67 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 133.24 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 23,730.03 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"L"LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,643.93 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 12,460.84 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 20,377.76 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,506.88 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 55,157.72 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 3,292.31 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 13,706.27 340 FACILITIES 68,192.34 375 INTERN FELLOWSHIP FUND 34.81 395 2011 FINANCING LEASE CIVIC CENTER&CRC 534,990.63 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 51.57 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 51.57 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 51.57 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 51.57 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 51.57 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 309.26 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 4,240.39 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 2,871.08 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 3,137.02 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 629.69 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 2,668.37 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 1,510.40 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 1,776.62 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 16,626.02 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 128.56 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 532.08 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 103.44 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 13,196.69 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 2,311.38 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 1,014.75 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 1,008.62 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 2,629.21 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 172.51 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 8,608.01 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 3,852.80 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 17,992.27 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 19,087.82 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 351.92 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 531.61 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 34,297.68 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 3,411.57 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 216.19 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 635.31 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 15,395.53 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 253.92 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 7,477.33 $2,824,195.02 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 282,612.28 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 1,369.75 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 382.61 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,018.00 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRI 99,670.81 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 245.12 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,154.43 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"L"LAKE PARK MAINT 178.57 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 941.85 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,860.32 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 21,012.34 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 5,353.62 340 FACILITIES 10,533.51 375 INTERN FELLOWSHIP FUND 289.26 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 62.11 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 62.11 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 62.11 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 62.11 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 62.11 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 372.68 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 72.83 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CRE 48.94 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 58.05 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 10.46 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 117.48 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COU 21.37 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 30.09 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 199.61 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.28 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9.08 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 6.01 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 133.09 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELO 28.44 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOME 16.43 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTAT 14.27 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 33.23 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2.78 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 123.41 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 65.88 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 178.95 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 302.83 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 7.18 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 7.94 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 170.24 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 54.75 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITI 2.42 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 7.94 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 251.11 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTR 3.47 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 39,128.22 471,414.48 TOTAL BY FUND: $3,295,609.50 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 3065 08/25/2016 000246 PERS(EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 39,473.35 39,473.35 RETIREMENT) 3066 08/26/2016 014685 COMPASS BANK '11 REFUNDING 01/08 CERT PART 534,990.63 534,990.63 DEBT SVC 178810 09/01/2016 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, SEPT 2016 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 633.60 LLC PRGM CREDIT BILLING ADJ: DEDUCT ONE -4.40 629.20 178811 09/01/2016 014170 AHERN RENTALS INC SM EQUIP PREV MAINT:CIVIC 190.00 190.00 CENTER 178812 09/01/2016 016450 AIR EXCHANGE,INC. PLYMOVENT MAINTENANCE:STA 92 639.76 639.76 178813 09/01/2016 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS CERTIFICATIONS CARDS:AQUATICS 243.00 CERTIFICATIONS CARDS:AQUATICS 81.00 324.00 178814 09/01/2016 013950 AQUA CHILLOF SAN DIEGO AUG 16 MAINT SVCS DRINKING 184.14 WATER:CC AUG 16 MAINT SVCS DRINKING WATER: 34.83 AUG 16 DRINKING WATER SRVCS:INFO' 28.35 AUG 16 WATER SVCS:POLICE STOREFR 28.35 AUG 16 MAINT SVCS DRINKING WATER: 28.35 AUG 16 MAINT SVCS DRINKING WATER: 28.35 332.37 178815 09/01/2016 019242 AROS,CORINNE REFUND:OVERPMT FOR ROD RUN 15.00 15.00 178816 09/01/2016 019231 AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS,INC. PARKING CITATION:UN05580621161 61.07 61.07 178817 09/01/2016 011954 BAKER&TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 969.91 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY -12.10 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY -27.23 930.58 178818 09/01/2016 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES:HEALTH&WELLNESS FAIR 1,074.38 1,074.38 PRODUCTS,INC 178819 09/01/2016 018101 BARN STAGE COMPANY INC, SETTLEMENT:CABARET...MERC 1,008.00 1,008.00 THE 08/28/16 178820 09/01/2016 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC EE COMPUTER LOAN PRGRM:MUNOZ, 1,346.34 1,346.34 MARIO 178821 09/01/2016 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE 1,417.00 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE 806.70 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE 498.00 2,721.70 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178822 09/01/2016 009127 BOCA SYSTEMS I NC Theater Ticket Stock 1,943.27 1,943.27 178823 09/01/2016 003138 CALMAT MISC ASPHALT SUPPLIES:PW STREET 90.55 90.55 MAI NT 178824 09/01/2016 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 MISC SUPPLIES:FIRE TCC 648.30 648.30 178825 09/01/2016 017476 CROUCH,LAWRENCE REFUND:OVERPMT FOR ROD RUN 15.00 15.00 178826 09/01/2016 019245 CROWNE HILL REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 150.00 178827 09/01/2016 010486 D D LTRAFFIC,INC. TRAFFIC SIG BATTERY BACKUP 7,491.84 7,491.84 EQUIP:PW 178828 09/01/2016 012600 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 5/29-6/25 DSGNSRVCS:LIBRARY 4,496.48 INC PARKING 6/26-7/30 DSGN SRVCS:LIBRARY PARKIN 3,626.40 8,122.88 178829 09/01/2016 011202 EMH SPORTS USA,INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 611.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 315.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 315.00 1,241.80 178830 09/01/2016 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE JUN EIR:CYPRESS RIDGE 25,010.99 ASSOC. DEVELOPMENT MAY-JUN EIR:PROPOSED ALTAIR SPECIF 5,881.18 30,892.17 178831 09/01/2016 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION JUL 16 PLAN CHECK SERVICES:COM 8,432.00 8,432.00 DEV DEPT 178832 09/01/2016 019219 FEA,MICHAEL REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.382 35.00 35.00 178833 09/01/2016 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8/4-8/8 EXP MAIL SVCS: 98.46 98.46 FIRE/TCSD/INFO 178834 09/01/2016 011145 FOSTER,JILL CHRISTINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 450.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,883.70 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,047.20 3,381.70 178835 09/01/2016 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES Supplies:High Hopes program 309.32 309.32 INC 178836 09/01/2016 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA,INC. AUG INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 184.99 184.99 178837 09/01/2016 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS Sound/Lighting&Misc Supplies:Theater 113.61 113.61 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178838 09/01/2016 010326 G E MOBILE WATER,INC SOFT WATER:STA 73 63.72 63.72 178839 09/01/2016 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC SETTLEMENT:CLASSICS...MERC 474.60 474.60 SOCIETY AUGUST 2016 178840 09/01/2016 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL AUG 16 LEASE 16 COPIERS:CITY 520.09 520.09 SVQS HALL/OFF-SI 178841 09/01/2016 019230 HALPERT,LES REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.380 35.00 35.00 178842 09/01/2016 012129 HAVENS FOR THE ARTS STTLMNT:TWO GENTLEMN OF 10,353.98 10,353.98 V E RONA 8/11-27 178843 09/01/2016 000520 HDL COREN&CONE INC JUL-SEP PROPERTY TAX 5,250.00 5,250.00 CONS ULTI NGFI NANCE 178844 09/01/2016 001135 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL NON-DOT DRUG SCREEN 30.00 30.00 GROUP INC 178845 09/01/2016 019244 HOBBY LOBBY STORES,INC. '16 PDAPPRECIATION BLUE RIBBON 2,149.20 2,149.20 CAMPAIGN 178846 09/01/2016 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, WASHER&DRYER:STA 92 2,209.14 2,209.14 THE 178847 09/01/2016 003198 HOME DEPOT,THE MAINT SUPPLIES:VARIOUS 74.82 74.82 FACILITIES 178848 09/01/2016 017334 HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC. GARAGE DOOR MAINTENANCE:STA 1,715.31 1,715.31 92 178849 09/01/2016 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT JUL 16 COPIER 4,596.19 SOLUTIONS MAI NT/REPAI R/USAGE:CITYWI D JUL 16 COPIER MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:C 517.26 5,113.45 178850 09/01/2016 003296 INTL CODE COUNCIL 2016 CODE CYCLE CODE BOOKS: 187.94 187.94 PREVENTION 178851 09/01/2016 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY,INC. paper/binding/pckg supp:central services 234.96 234.96 178852 09/01/2016 001091 KEYSER MARSTON JUL 16 REAL ESTATE 2,008.75 2,008.75 ASSOCIATES INC CNSLTNG:AFFRDBL HOUSI 178853 09/01/2016 017118 KRACH,BREE B. INCENTIVE AWARDS:AQUATICS 113.40 113.40 178854 09/01/2016 014432 LANAIR GROUP,LLC SHORETELANNUALSUPPORT:IT 14,685.00 SHORETELANNUAL SUPPORT:IT 2,400.00 17,085.00 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178855 09/01/2016 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES MEDIA TRAINING:LOWREY 09/16/16 25.00 25.00 178856 09/01/2016 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES ME DIA TRAINING:DAM KO 09/16/16 25.00 25.00 178857 09/01/2016 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS signs and supplies:pw street maint div 6,554.36 signs and supplies:pw street maint div 125.89 signs and supplies:pw street maint div 53.95 signs and supplies:pw street maint div 38.88 6,773.08 178858 09/01/2016 018174 MARMADUKE,INC. VET CARE:K-9 OFFICER:RUDY 355.00 355.00 178859 09/01/2016 015259 MERCURY DISPOSAL Household battery recycling program. 273.60 273.60 SYSTEMS,INC. 178860 09/01/2016 018314 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC. APR EIR:TEMECULA CREEK INN 29,206.32 DEVELOPMENT JUL 16 CEQASTUDIES:GEN SR HOUSIN( 16,069.10 JUL 16 ENG SRVCS:PW CIP-SIDEWALK 4,294.91 MAY 16 CEQA INITIAL STUDY:ART GAITA 2,100.53 5/2-7/31 DSGN SVCS FOR YNEZ RD SIDE 128.94 51,799.80 178861 09/01/2016 012962 MILLER,MISTY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 399.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 399.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 189.00 987.00 178862 09/01/2016 012264 MIRANDA,JULIO C. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 498.75 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 199.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 146.91 845.16 178863 09/01/2016 016445 MKB PRINTING& Business Cards:Finance Payroll 41.86 41.86 PROMOTIONAL INC 178864 09/01/2016 019243 MONTGOMERY,EDWARD REFUND:OVERPMT FOR ROD RUN 15.00 15.00 178865 09/01/2016 004040 MORAMARCO,ANTHONY J. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 448.00 448.00 178866 09/01/2016 001986 MUZAK LLC SEP DISH NETWORK 140.85 PROGRAMING:FOC SEP DISH NETWORK PRGRMNG:41952 E 62.01 202.86 178867 09/01/2016 002292 OASIS VENDING KITCHEN SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER 431.43 KITCHEN SUPPLIES:FIELD OPS CENTEF 121.37 552.80 178868 09/01/2016 010167 ODYSSEY POWER UPS PREVENTATIVE MAINT:CIVIC 2,530.00 CORPORATION CENTER UPS preventative maint:Library 1,178.75 3,708.75 Page-.4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178869 09/01/2016 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 11.11 DIV OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 92.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 87.72 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 51.80 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 32.37 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 11.86 287.42 178870 09/01/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PARKS 587.42 MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAI NT SVCS:PARKS MAIN 487.60 CITY VEHICLE MAI NIT SVCS:PARKS MAIN 57.95 1,132.97 178871 09/01/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:FIRE PREV 581.55 581.55 178872 09/01/2016 005573 PALOMA ELEMENTARY PTA REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 150.00 178873 09/01/2016 019180 PALOMAR HEALTH SART Exam:TE161960100:tem police 1,350.00 1,350.00 178874 09/01/2016 019249 PLATTS,JOHN AND LISA REFUND:ENG GRAD DEP:LD15-2047 3,000.00 3,000.00 178875 09/01/2016 014957 PRN PRODUCTIONS COMEDY @ THE MERC 8/27/16 313.60 313.60 178876 09/01/2016 019222 PROTECH PRODUCTS REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.379 35.00 35.00 178877 09/01/2016 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER JUL VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC 31,479.59 DISTRICT LEV C JUL VAR WATER METERS:PW VARIOUS! 2,836.35 JUL WATER METER:30875 RANCHO VIST 607.62 JUL VAR WATER METERS:FIRE STNS 577.31 35,500.87 178878 09/01/2016 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL WEED/TRASH ABATEMENT: 1,184.00 1,184.00 MANAGEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS 178879 09/01/2016 002412 RICHARDS WATSON& California Municipal Law Handbook 393.63 393.63 GERSHON 178880 09/01/2016 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK& NTC EXMPT FY15/16 CTYWD 50.00 50.00 RECORDER CONCRETE REPAIRS 178881 09/01/2016 017446 ROSE AGAIN FOUNDATION FY 16/17 CSF/MN-KIDS SOAR PRGM 1,000.00 FY 16/17 CSF/MM-KIDS SOAR PRGM 1,000.00 FY 16/17 CSF/ME-KIDS SOAR PRGM 1,500.00 FY 16/17 CSF-BTC HOLIDAY PRGM 1,000.00 FY 16/17 CSF/MR-KIDS SOAR PRGM 1,000.00 FY 16/17 CSF/JC-KIDS SOAR PRGM 1,000.00 6,500.00 Page 5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178882 09/01/2016 012251 ROTH,DONALD J. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 73.50 73.50 178883 09/01/2016 019248 SAN DIEGO CO CITY CLERKS RECORDS TRNG 9/21/16 GWYN 25.00 25.00 ASSN. FLORES 178884 09/01/2016 017699 SARNOWSKI,SHAWNA,M PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS:CULTURAL 150.00 150.00 PRESTON ARTS 178885 09/01/2016 019224 SFETKU,NICK REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.381 35.00 35.00 178886 09/01/2016 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 8/25/16 505.00 505.00 178887 09/01/2016 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUL 2-30-608-9384:28582 HARVESTON 680.45 DR JUL 2-34-624-4452:32131 S LOOP RD LOl 407.89 JUL 2-30-296-9522:46679 PRIMROSE AVE 371.68 JUL 2-28-331-4847:32805 PAUBA RD LS3 86.42 AUG 2-33-357-5785:44747 REDHAWK PK\ 38.74 AUG 2-35-164-3770:43487 BUTTERFIELD 25.63 AUG 2-35-164-3242:44270 MEADOWS PK' 24.84 AUG 2-35-164-3515:32932 LEENA WAY 23.94 AUG 2-35-164-3663:42335 MEADOWS PK' 23.79 JUL 2-30-099-3847:29721 RYECREST 23.51 1,706.89 178888 09/01/2016 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUL 095-167-7907-2:30650 PAUBA RD 123.76 JUL 125-244-2108-3:30600 PAUBA RD 15.35 139.11 178889 09/01/2016 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SRVCS:O.A.T.C. 48.00 48.00 CONTROLINC 178890 09/01/2016 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 560.00 INSTRUCTION TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 385.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 336.00 1,281.00 178891 09/01/2016 013184 TEMECULA LUISENO REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 150.00 178892 09/01/2016 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PURCHASE DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR 2,142.72 2,142.72 COMPANY RRSP 178893 09/01/2016 019239 THE MORTGAGE LAW FIRM REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 PLC RENTAL:RRSP 178894 09/01/2016 018222 TVUSD REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 450.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178895 09/01/2016 006427 VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA REFUND:SEC DEP:POOL RENTAL:CRC 150.00 150.00 178896 09/01/2016 004861 VON RICHTER,POLLY COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM 953.91 953.91 178897 09/01/2016 007987 WALMART EXHIBITS/EXPERIMENTS SUPPLIES:C. 284.80 MUSEUM STATION MAINT SUPPLIES:STA 92 85.96 370.76 178898 09/01/2016 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 7/16-31/16 TRIMS, REMOVALS:HARV 14,685.00 SLOPES 7/20-31/16 TRIMS,REMOVALS:PRKS&M 3,321.00 18,006.00 178899 09/01/2016 000341 WILLDANASSOCIATES INC JUL TRAFFIC ENG SRVCS:PW 2,231.00 2,231.00 TRAFFIC 1001230 08/25/2016 019232 ANDERSON,MASAMI REF UN D:PRESCHOOL GYMNASTICS 118.00 118.00 1705.205 1001231 08/25/2016 019199 AUGUSTINE,WILHELMINA REF UN D:PRESCHOOL GYMNASTICS 376.00 376.00 1705.205 1001232 08/25/2016 019238 SANTA MARGARITA RANCHOS REFUND:COMM RM A 48.00 48.00 RENTAL:LIBRARY 1001233 08/25/2016 019234 BOLEN,LAUREN REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:RRSP 1001234 08/25/2016 019235 COLON,ALICIA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 200.00 200.00 1001235 08/25/2016 019236 JONES,KASEEM REFUND:SEC DEP:GYMNASIUM:CRC 200.00 200.00 1001236 08/25/2016 017107 PROVI DO,ROMEO REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 200.00 200.00 1001237 08/25/2016 019233 ATNIP,COURTNEY REFUND:BIGFOOT'S SMASH VIDEO 10.00 10.00 GAME 1001238 08/25/2016 019237 MICHELSON,DAN REFUND:BIGFOOT'S SMASH VIDEO 10.00 10.00 GAME 1001239 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.204 35.00 35.00 1001240 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.205 35.00 35.00 1001241 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.206 35.00 35.00 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1001242 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.207 35.00 35.00 1001243 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.209 35.00 35.00 1001244 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.208 35.00 35.00 1001245 08/25/2016 019201 PINA,RUBEN REFUND:TEM ROD RUN 7000.210 35.00 35.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 841,263.47 Page.8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 09/01/2016 10:03:18AM CITY OF TEMECULA 108 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 841,263.47 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 3067 09/08/2016 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT:PAYMENT 1,128.45 1,128.45 SUPPORT 3068 09/08/2016 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC. CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT FSA: 5,796.00 5,796.00 PAYMENT 3069 09/08/2016 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 457: 9,967.92 9,967.92 303355 PAYMENT 3070 09/08/2016 000444 INSTATAX(EDD) STATE DISABILITY INS:PAYMENT 27,261.60 27,261.60 3071 09/08/2016 000283 1NSTATAX(IRS) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES:PAYMENT 94,287.11 94,287.11 3072 09/08/2016 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA-PROJECT RETIREMENT: 2,145.62 2,145.62 SOLUTION PAYMENT 3073 09/08/2016 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT:PAYMENT 12,007.19 12,007.19 SOLUTION 3074 09/08/2016 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT: 93.24 93.24 SOLUTION PAYMENT 3075 09/08/2016 000245 PERS-HEALTH INSUR COBRA-MEDICAL:PAYMENT 101,219.00 101,219.00 PREMIUM 3076 09/08/2016 000246 PERS(EMPLOYEES' PERS BUY BACK PRE TAX:PAYMENT 40,398.58 40,398.58 RETIREMENT) 178900 09/08/2016 019075 ADO RAMA INC MISCA/V SUPPLIES:PEG EQUIPMENT 319.00 319.00 178901 09/08/2016 014170 AHERN RENTALS INC SM EQUIP PREV MAINT:CIVIC 454.39 454.39 CENTER 178902 09/08/2016 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS CAAND USA FLAGS:CIVIC CENTER 793.80 793.80 178903 09/08/2016 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT:PW 3,132.76 3,132.76 CORPORATION TRAFFIC 178904 09/08/2016 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA 401.42 (AFN) POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 84.76 486.18 178905 09/08/2016 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS CERTIFICATIONS CARDS:AQUATICS 945.00 945.00 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178906 09/08/2016 004623 AQUASOURCEINC WATER CHEMICALSUPPLIES:TES 1,754.68 1,754.68 POOL 178907 09/08/2016 011954 BAKER&TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 2,117.40 2,117.40 178908 09/08/2016 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL SPORTS:VAR PROGRAM AWARDS& 3,898.80 3,898.80 PRODUCTS,INC UNIFORMS 178909 09/08/2016 012583 BLANCAY PRICE JUL 16 LDSCP PLAN CHECK& 3,765.50 3,765.50 INSPECTION SRV 178910 09/08/2016 005889 BROWN,PASCALE EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM 2,000.00 2,000.00 178911 09/08/2016 004462 CDW,LLC MISC SMALLTOOLS&EQUIP:INFO 2,820.68 2,820.68 TECHNOLOGY 178912 09/08/2016 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EMPLOYEE CHAIRTY DONATIONS: 24.00 24.00 CHARITIES,C/O WELLS FARGO PAYMENT BANK 178913 09/08/2016 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SECURITY SYS MAI NT SRVC:TCC 75.00 INSTALL NEW PANIC BUTTON:MRC 300.00 CHECK PANIC BUTTON:IWTCM 75.00 450.00 178914 09/08/2016 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:OLD TOWN 691.47 DIST. PARKING GA ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARK: 122.32 813.79 178915 09/08/2016 011922 CORELOGIC,INC. JUL 16 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 251.50 251.50 SOFTWARE 178916 09/08/2016 010747 CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 178917 09/08/2016 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 Youth Intern Luncheon 159.86 159.86 178918 09/08/2016 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC Traffic count data collection:pw 14,925.00 14,925.00 178919 09/08/2016 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING& PLUMBING SRVC:LIBRARY:MEADOWS 350.22 HVACINC PARK PLUMBING SRVC:LIBRARY:MEADOWS R 306.34 656.56 178920 09/08/2016 001393 DATA TICKET,INC. JUL 16 PARKING CITATION 1,115.12 1,115.12 PROCESSINGPOLIC 178921 09/08/2016 002990 DAVID TURCH&ASSOCIATES JUL 16 FED LEGISLATIVE CONSULTING 3,500.00 3,500.00 SVCS: Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178922 09/08/2016 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL& FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:BLDG 274.88 LUBRICANTS INSPECTORS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 684.77 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TRAFFIC DIV 193.64 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:PUBLIC WOF 585.21 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TCSD 370.11 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:CODE ENFOI 114.47 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:POLICE 81.88 2,304.96 178925 09/08/2016 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE,INC. IRRIGATION REPAIR:WOLF CREEK 73.97 IRRIGATION UPGRADES:VAR SPORTSPP 750.00 IRRIGATION UPGRADES:VARSPORTSPP 1,275.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS:VILLAGE HILLS 85.51 IRRIGATION REPAIRS:RANCHO HIGHLA 105.53 IRRIGATION REPAIR:VILLAGE GROVE 258.77 IRRIGATION REPAIR:VINTAGE HILLS 278.53 AUG 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVCS:SOUTH 34,054.66 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAINT SVCS:VAR FACIL 10,708.73 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VAIL RANCH 193.49 OVERSEED TURF:REDHAWK COMM PAI 675.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS:RANCHO HIGHLA 104.71 IRRIGATION REPAIRS:J VILLAGES 215.88 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARK 48,665.00 AUG 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARI 48,665.00 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARK 51,727.00 AUG 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SVCS: NORTH S 21,558.24 AUG 16 LNDSCPE MAI NT SRVCS:VAR F/ 10,708.73 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVCS:SOUTH E 34,054.66 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SVCS:NORTH SL 21,558.24 AUG 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARI 18,194.00 JUL 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARK 18,194.00 AUG 16 LNDSCP MAI NT SRVC:VAR PARI 51,727.00 373,831.65 178926 09/08/2016 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN:PAYMENT 887.50 887.50 178927 09/08/2016 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8/18 EXP MAIL SVCS:CITY CLERK 11.47 11.47 178928 09/08/2016 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT:PAYMENT 350.00 350.00 178929 09/08/2016 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA,INC. AUG GENERAL USAGE/SVCS:EOC 134.61 134.61 178930 09/08/2016 016184 FUN EXPRESS,LLC Supplies:Special Events 955.74 Supplies:Special Events 1,455.56 2,411.30 178931 09/08/2016 014658 GREAT OAK ACADEMIC REFUND:SECDEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:PALA PARK Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178932 09/08/2016 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL AUG LEASE 16 COPIERS:CITY 289.44 SVGS HALL/OFF-SITE AUG LEASE 16 COPIERS:CITY HALL/TVE 1,341.71 AUG LEASE 16 COPIERS:CITY HALL/OFF 788.42 2,419.57 178933 09/08/2016 017334 HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC. GATE&BAY DOOR MAI NT:STA 84 1,892.13 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR:STA 73 255.00 2,147.13 178934 09/08/2016 018059 ICON ENTERPRISES,INC WEBSITE ANNUAL MAINT:INFOTECH 8,422.00 8,422.00 178935 09/08/2016 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS:VAR 442.26 442.26 INC POOLS 178936 09/08/2016 000501 INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:FLORES, 95.00 95.00 GWYN 178937 09/08/2016 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHAIRTY DONATIONS: 40.00 40.00 PAYMENT 178938 09/08/2016 017118 KRACH,BREE B. TROPHIES AND MEDALS:SPORTS 121.11 121.11 PROGRAMS 178939 09/08/2016 019122 L.A.TRAFFIC SIGNAL Modification of traffic signal:pw cip 3,382.00 3,382.00 178940 09/08/2016 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC JUL 16 GEOTECH SRVCS FOR OLD 1,256.50 1,256.50 TOWN FRONT 178941 09/08/2016 019254 LEOS,MARIA REFUND:RM RENTAL/STAFF FEE:TCC 400.00 REFUND:STAFFING FEE:RM RENTAL:TC( 100.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 150.00 650.00 178942 09/08/2016 004905 LIEBERT,CASSIDY& JUL 16 HR LEGAL SVCS FOR 665.00 665.00 WHITMORE TE060-00001 178943 09/08/2016 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE AUG XXX-0346 GENERAL USAGE 31.91 AUG XXX-0714 GEN USAGE:PD MALLAL 35.07 66.98 178944 09/08/2016 004141 MAINTEX INC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARK 1,190.99 1,190.99 SITES 178945 09/08/2016 019165 MCWHORTER,GREGORY ROY LECTURE:TVM 250.00 250.00 178946 09/08/2016 016297 MID-AMERICAARTS ALLIANCE Exhibit rental:"Sign of the Times" 2,550.00 2,550.00 178947 09/08/2016 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING WELDING SRVCS:FOC&CROWNE 2,550.00 2,550.00 INC. HILL PARK Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178948 09/08/2016 016445 MKB PRINTING& Printing:2016 Quilt Show 5.00 PROMOTIONAL INC Printing:2016 Quilt Show 328.17 333.17 178949 09/08/2016 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 7/23-8/22/16 DRINKING WATER SVC: 120.31 AMERICA FOC 07/23-08/22 DRINKING WATER SVC:MUS 21.22 07/23-08/22 BOTTLED WATER SVC:TCC 23.96 07/23-08/22 DRINKING WATER SVC:IWT( 23.03 7/23-8/22 BOTTLED WATER SVC:CITY C( 27.32 7/23-8/22 BOTTLED WATER SERVICES 31.96 7/23-8/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC:OTTT 41.15 7/23-8/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC:TESC F 45.14 7/23-8/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC:SKATE 6.47 7/23-8/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC:PBSP 30.19 7/15-8/14/16 WATER FOR POOLS:AQUATI 48.40 7/23-8/22/16 WATER DELIVERY SVC:CRC 183.29 7/23-8/22/16 WATER DELIVERY SVC:TPL 74.11 676.55 178950 09/08/2016 019097 NORTHWEST TERRITORIAL IMPRINTED MEDALLIONS:FIRE 2,568.75 2,568.75 MINT LLC 178951 09/08/2016 002292 OASIS VENDING KITCHEN&COFFEE SUPPLIES:MPSC 899.72 899.72 178952 09/08/2016 010167 ODYSSEY POWER BATTERY REPLACE&UPS UNIT:CITY 3,292.31 3,292.31 CORPORATION HALL 178953 09/08/2016 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR DEPT 19.41 DIV OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR DEPT 38.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR DEPT 122.20 179.78 178954 09/08/2016 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE&SERVICE VEH REPAIRS&MAINT:PW PARK 372.57 MAI NT VEH REPAIRS&MAINT:PW STREET MAIf 47.15 VEH REPAIRS&MAINT:PW STREET MAIf 47.15 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS&MAINT:MEDIC! 464.28 VEH REPAIR&MAINT:B&S DEPT 486.32 1,417.47 178955 09/08/2016 004605 PERSONAL TOUCH CATERING CATERING SVCS:COMMISSION 798.00 798.00 RECOG 9/1/16 178956 09/08/2016 010338 POOL&ELECTRICAL POOL SUPPLIES&CHEMICALS:VAR 418.18 418.18 PRODUCTS INC POOLS 178957 09/08/2016 011549 POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED VEH MAINT&REPAIR:POLICE BMW 482.71 482.71 MOTORS 178958 09/08/2016 005820 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES:PAYMENT 384.70 384.70 INC Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178959 09/08/2016 017431 PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE:PAYMENT 8,388.71 8,388.71 CO 178960 09/08/2016 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL AUG FLR 487.98 487.98 SUPPLY MATS/UNIFORMS/TOWELS:CITY FACS 178961 09/08/2016 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS INC TRASH CONTAINERS:VAR PARKS& 14,405.04 FACILITIES trash containersvar parks&facilities 8,002.80 22,407.84 178962 09/08/2016 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES:PW LAND 10.80 10.80 DEV 178963 09/08/2016 019157 REGINA DEANNA ORNELAS REFRESHMENTS:HIGH HOPES PGRM 583.20 583.20 EVENT 178964 09/08/2016 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE FPARC-TM,INV#232280,15/16,Q4 1,036,419.69 1,036,419.69 DEPARTMENT 178965 09/08/2016 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO Emerg radio rental&repairl:PD motors 2,839.80 2,839.80 TECHNOLOGY 178966 09/08/2016 001365 RIVERSIDE,COUNTY OF APR-JUN'16 VECTOR CONTROLSVCS 5,262.29 5,262.29 178967 09/08/2016 017102 ROBINSON,SHIRLEY EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM 1,723.72 1,723.72 178968 09/08/2016 000277 S&S ARTS&CRAFTS INC CRC REC SUPPLIES 97.15 97.15 178969 09/08/2016 004274 SAFE&SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCK REPLACEMENT-.FIRE STN 92 141.60 LOCKSMITH SERVICES:CIVIC CENTER 15.12 LOCKSMITH SERVICES:PW 28.51 DUPLICATE KEYS:VARIOUS FACILITIES 78.84 LOCKSMITH SVCS:THEATER 118.36 382.43 178970 09/08/2016 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV- SUPPORT PAYMENT:PAYMENT 100.00 100.00 CENTRAL 178971 09/08/2016 013695 SHRED-IT US JV,LLC DOCUMENT SHRED SVCS:POLICE 8/18 17.37 17.37 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178973 09/08/2016 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 2-29-657-2787:41638 23.51 WINCHESTER AUG 2-00-397-5042:43200 BUS PARK DR 5,485.13 AUG 2-30-220-8749:45850 N WOLF CREE 272.28 AUG 2-29-953-8447:31738 WOLF VLY RD 23.79 AUG 2-29-657-2332:45538 REDWOOD RD 24.07 AUG 2-29-953-8082:31523 WOLF VLY RD 27.14 AUG 2-29-953-8249:46497 WOLF CREEK 26.02 AUG 2-25-393-4681:41951 MORAGA RD 668.02 AUG 2-35-403-6337:41375 MCCABE CT 1,210.30 AUG 2-35-664-9053:29119 MARGARITA RI 766.64 AUG 2-31-419-2873:43000 HWY-395 23.39 AUG 2-32-903-8293:41000 MAIN ST 32,379.45 AUG 2-02-351-4946:41845 6TH ST 2,185.86 AUG 2-00-397-5067:TCSD SVC LEV C 2,079.99 AUG 2-29-295-3510:32211 WOLF VLY RD 1,950.01 AUG 2-36-641-3839:27498 ENTERPRISE( 26.92 AUG 2-36-641-3912:27498 ENTERPRISE( 32.85 JUL-AUG 2-28-904-7706:32329 OVERLAN 124.35 JUL-AUG 2-21-981-4720:30152 TEM PKW` 18.94 AUG 2-30-520-4414:32781 TEM PKWY LS: 964.60 AUG 2-31-536-3226:28690 MERCEDES S1 1,870.30 AUG 2-14-204-1615:30027 FRONT ST RDI 54.95 AUG 2-18-937-3152:28314 MERCEDES S1 1,379.46 AUG 2-19-171-8568:28300 MERCEDES S1 632.99 AUG 2-29-807-1093:28079 DIAZ RD PED 23.94 AUG 2-29-807-1226:28077 DIAZ RD PED 23.78 AUG 2-29-933-3831:43230 BUS PARK DR 2,564.34 AUG 2-31-031-2616:27991 DIAZ RD PED 24.41 AUG 2-31-282-0665:27407 DIAZ RD PED 24.55 AUG 2-31-536-3481:41902 MAIN ST 160.93 AUG 2-31-536-3655:41904 MAIN ST 24.59 AUG 2-31-912-7494:28690 MERCEDES S1 2,323.07 AUG 2-34-333-3589:41702 MAIN ST 24.59 AUG 2-29-223-8607:42035 2ND ST PED 606.39 AUG 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT FRONT ST 1,019.38 AUG 2-35-707-0010:33451 S HWY-79 50.03 59,120.96 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178974 09/08/2016 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AUG 091-085-1632-0:41951 MORAGA 208.49 RD AUG 101-525-0950-0:28816 PUJOL ST 15.35 AUG 026-671-2909-8:42051 MAIN ST 26.95 AUG 028-025-1468-3:41375 MCCABE CT 19.57 AUG 117-188-6393-6:32131 S LOOP RD 22.78 AUG 101-525-1560-6:27415 ENTERPRISE 94.51 AUG 021-725-0775-4:41845 6TH ST 65.94 AUG 133-040-7373-0:43210 BUS PARK DF 18.52 AUG 181-383-8881-6:28314 MERCEDES S 18.52 AUG 129-535-4236-7:41000 MAIN ST 506.43 AUG 129-582-9784-3:43230 BUS PARK DF 25.89 AUG 091-024-9300-5:30875 RANCHO VIS" 220.87 AUG 098-255-9828-8:29119 MARGARITA F 14.30 1,258.12 178975 09/08/2016 017954 SOTO,PATRICIA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 178976 09/08/2016 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SRVCS:FIRE STN 73 68.00 CONTROLINC PEST CONTROL:WOLF CREEK&BIRDSP 70.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 94.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 80.00 312.00 178977 09/08/2016 005786 SPRINT JUL 20-AUG 19 CELLULAR 110.20 110.20 USAGE/EQUIP 178981 09/08/2016 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE:PAYMENT 7,955.96 7,955.96 COMPANY 178982 09/08/2016 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE: 942.71 942.71 COMPANY PAYMENT 178983 09/08/2016 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION DUES:PAYMENT 4,803.00 4,803.00 178984 09/08/2016 019179 TEMECULA MAP GUIDE Ad space:fall 2016 Guide Map 395.00 395.00 178985 09/08/2016 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM 216.17 LLC POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM POLI, 79.71 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM POLI, 273.62 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM POLI, 176.12 745.62 178986 09/08/2016 011090 TEMECULAVALLEY TRANS PORTATIO N:NIXON LIBRARY 721.00 721.00 TRANSPORTATION 11/9/16 178987 09/08/2016 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PLUMBING SUPPLIES:VAR PARKS 84.26 84.26 COMPANY Page.B apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 178988 09/08/2016 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE SEP HIGH SPEED INTERNET-.LIBRARY 599.19 599.19 178989 09/08/2016 017430 TRANSAMERICA LIFE TRANSAMERICA ACCIDENT 2,968.46 2,968.46 INSURANCE CO ADVANTAG:PAYMENT 178990 09/08/2016 017579 U.S.HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL Pre employ drug screenings:HR 55.00 55.00 178991 09/08/2016 019001 ULTRASYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS:GENERATIONS 3,000.00 3,000.00 ENVIRONMENTAL INC SR.HOUSE 178992 09/08/2016 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATOR 205.50 205.50 ALERT ALERTS:PW 178993 09/08/2016 002110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH EQUIP RENTALS:PW STREET MAINT 16.20 16.20 AMERICA DIV 178994 09/08/2016 000325 UNITED WAY EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS: 5.00 5.00 PAYMENT 178995 09/08/2016 012549 UPODIUM VEHICLE MAINTSUPPLIES:FIRE STN 201.75 201.75 92 178996 09/08/2016 000319 VARSITY BRANDS HOLDING TENNIS NETS:TVHS 954.64 954.64 CO,INC 178997 09/08/2016 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 7/16-8/15 BROADBAND 1,929.08 1,929.08 SVCS:CITYWI DE 178998 09/08/2016 007987 WALMART MISCSUPPLIES:MPSC 359.54 SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 28.29 CRC REC SUPPLIES 66.44 454.27 178999 09/08/2016 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CUSTODIALSUPPLIES:VAR PARKS& 1,806.40 1,806.40 FAC 179000 09/08/2016 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC EMERG TREE TRIMS& 800.00 REMOVALS:SLOPES TREE TRIMS&REMOVALS:VINTAGE HILL: 2,499.00 TREE TRIMS&REMOVALS:ROW TREES 21,220.00 TREE TRIMS&REMOVALS:HARV SLOPE 8,277.00 TREE TRIMS&REMOVALS:VILLAGES SL 475.00 33,271.00 179001 09/08/2016 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL Janitorial srvcs:police old town office 295.84 SERVICES,INC JUL JANITORIAL SVCS:MARG REC CTR( 593.83 SEP JANITORIAL SVCS:VAR FACILITIES 24,093.48 24,983.15 1001246 08/31/2016 019252 NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1001247 08/31/2016 019241 ROBERTS,TRACEY REF UN D:PRESCHOOL GYMNASTICS 94.40 94.40 1705.204 1001248 08/31/2016 019240 TOMASIAN,SHERRY REFUND:BEGINNING GYMNASTICS 54.40 54.40 1710.204 1001249 09/01/2016 019253 GAMBOA,CAMILA REF UN D:PRESCHOOL GYMNASTICS 43.20 43.20 1700.206 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,982,931.55 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 09/08/2016 11:48:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA 110 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,982,931.55 Page:11 Item No . 4 Approvals City Attorney A?_ Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Michael Baker International for an Environmental Initial Study for Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Michael Baker International, in the amount of $5,655, for the preparation of an Environmental Initial Study for Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe, for a total agreement amount of$78,270.50. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional work not to exceed the contingency amount of$7,115.50. BACKGROUND: The City is currently processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a proposed 11,722-square-foot restaurant. The 2.61 acre project site is generally located approximately 1,300 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection (APN: 961-440-015). Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Michael Baker International will provide an Initial Study for the project. The Initial Study will include a habitat assessment, focused burrowing owl study, delineation of jurisdictional waters, noise study, air quality and greenhouse gas assessment, cultural resource assessment, and paleontological assessment. The First Amendment to the Agreement includes additional environmental analysis and reflects the name change from RBF Consulting to Michael Baker International. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. The applicant has deposited sufficient funds in deposit account 001.2970 ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment to Agreement FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY FOR ART GAITAN'S MEXICO CAFE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of September 27, 2016 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Michael Baker International, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On February 10, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for an Environmental Initial Study for Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe,' in the amount of$65,500.00. b. The parties now desire to add scope of work, extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2017, increase the payment in the amount of $5,655, add contingency in the amount of $7,115.50, incorporate company name change and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2017 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The FIRST Amendment amount shall not exceed Five Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Five Dollars ($5,655.00), plus contingency in the amount of Seven Thousand One Hundred Fifteen Dollars and Fifty Cents ($7,115.50) for additional environmental analysis for a total Agreement Amount of Seventy Eight Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Dollars and Fifty Cents ($78,270.50). 4. All sections of the Agreement, and any prior Amendments that refer to the Consultant as "RBF Consulting" shall be changed to "Michael Baker International" pursuant to the name and ownership change of said company effective July 2015. 5. Exhibits "A" and "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Ernest Wade, Vice President ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk John Tanner III, PE, Temecula Office Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Michael Baker International Attn: Darren Edington 40810 County Center Drive Temecula, CA 92591 951.506.2083 dedington@mbakerintl.com PM Initials Date: 2 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBITS A and B Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and pricing as provided by the Consultant. 3 Michael Baker ' We Make a Difference I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L August 11,2016 Mr. Eric Jones City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula,California 92590 Subject: Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe Contract Amendment No. 1 Summary of Contract Amendment Request Michael Baker International(Michael Baker)has provided the following contract amendment of$5,655.00 for additional services requested by the City and Applicant to address the Least Bell's Vireo concerns that arose during the Initial Study process for the Mitigated Negative Declaration.The cost for the additional work conducted by Michael Baker is for the work efforts starting from June 21,2016 to July 31,2016.The work effort included Least Bell's Vireo surveys, Regional Conservation Authority meeting attendance and additional project management, agency coordination, and responses to City/Applicant questions. This contract amendment also includes costs for updating the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with the new project site plan updates that were agreed upon at the agency meeting. CONTRACT HISTORY The Original Agreement for consultant services initiated on February 10, 2015 was approved in the amount of$65,500. Current Approved Contract Contract Total: $65,500.00 Invoiced to Date: $53,932.35 Remaining Budget: $11,567.65 Michael Baker International Billing Rates for services performed for this contract amendment is as follows: Tom McGill—Technical Manager=$195/hr. Travis McGill—Biologist= 168/hr. Darren Edgington—Environmental Specialist=$152/hr. - Peter Minegar—Environmental Analyst=$112/hr. 40810 County Center Drive.Ste.200 1 Temecula,CA 92591 MBAK ER I NT L.CO M Off ice:951.676.80421 Fax:951.676.7240 4 Michael Baker requires an additional $5,655.00 for services provided from June 21, 2016 through July 31, 2016.A contract amendment is required for compensation of tasks completed below. Contract Amendment Request No. 1 TASK A— LEAST BELLS VIREO FOCUSED PRESENCE/ABSENCE SURVEY cost:....................................................................................................................................................... 51,650 Details: • Requested by the Applicant/City on June 21, 2016 via email. • Original Least Bell's Vireo survey proposed amount was$7,800. However, only two surveys were conducted—Survey 1 conducted on June 23, 2016—Survey 2 conducted on July 5, 2016. • Because only two surveys of the original 8 proposed were conducted,the cost is$1,650. If all 8 surveys were conducted,the cost would have been $6,600. TASK B—RCA MEETING ATTENDANCE Cost:......................................................................................................................................................... 511,041 Details: • Michael Baker International attended a Regional Conservation Authority(RCA)meeting on July 21, 2016. • Attendees from Michael Baker International included Darren Edgington (Project Manager/Environmental Specialist) and Thomas McGill (Environmental Resources Technical Manager) Three (3) hours for each attendee is invoiced on a time and materials basis for preparation for the meeting,travel,and meeting attendance. TASK C —ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENVMEETINGS/COORDINATION/RESPONSES Cost:..................................................................................................................................................... $2,364 Details: This task includes costs for additional project management, agency coordination and responses to questions from the applicant's representative and the City of Temecula during the time from June 21, 2016 through July 31, 2016. 5 Recommended Contingency Budget(not included in total)............................................ $10,000 This Contingency budget is recommended to avoid delays by having to go to City Council for approval of potential future additional work requests. This Contingency budget would only be utilized upon written authorization to proceed from the City, with a specific scope and budget for any additional work tasks requested by the Applicant or City. The recommended contingency allows for the following (upon receipt of written authorization from the City): • Revisions to the MND and/or related technical studies due to potential revisions to the Site Plan or related Project submittal documents; • Additional meetings(if needed); • Other items as deemed appropriate by the City Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me directly at (951) 506-2083 or via email at dedgington@mbakerintl.com. We appreciate the opportunity to continue to assist City staff and the Applicant with the CEQA process for the Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe Project. Sincerely, Darren Edgington, CEP-IT, LEED AP Project Manager Recommended Contingency Budget(not included in total)............................................ $10,000 This Contingency budget is recommended to avoid delays by having to go to City Council for approval of potential future additional work requests. This Contingency budget would only be utilized upon written authorization to proceed from the City, with a specific scope and budget for any additional work tasks requested by the Applicant or City. The recommended contingency allows for the following (upon receipt of written authorization from the C-ity): • Revisions to the MND and/or related technical studies due to potential revisions to the Site Plan or related Project submittal documents; • Additional meetings(if needed); • Other items as deemed appropriate by the City Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me directly at(951) 506-2083 or via email at dedgington@mbakerintl.com. We appreciate the opportunity to continue to assist City staff and the Applicant with the CEQA process for the Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe Project. Sincerely, Darren Edgington,CENT, LEED AP Project Manager 6 C31MMM We Mork?o D i ff rence INT1AIN At10 " AL Subjtrct; KcharelBaker Interriationatrweare:irrdloScoCharge f:lgarvatuedclieint alndctrM$asue: F&7years.Michael a7'tnternairirinalhagbeen praudzf theway W2MakeaD[ffecon{e"inshe cDmvnjnrtresweserv4e,This yea rCsas ci{cantmilemae.fortisa5it'#OM71eIThOMSout hisMi-yof excelleMednc:L more importantly,paves the For ourfuture growthand innovation,Asp art of this Celebration,we implemented br5ndiaghangea that affect the company name arldkgp you 5eeon{aur inwaic*5 arkdoathLr&ictd nent5,Effec.rve fuly r,119p CmisuItingwillbe mergedinta Michael 9aker IryternatromaL linc,ff rrnwrlyMkhsel$yker ar_kLc,j,I1w'nvwv'Micbaelgakerinternatienal bec and nano.-.0icn appearF,ion xhrs le tterlwad.All now bo used ern ail da[urilentS go inforwarv, Th is brandrrigerhamoment does rw aRed the work bei ngperforMPd under Vali rcantracr x the people invabadinyour Projects.Wedoh wea toKInnuFn4erwh1rhJ§.IlstedlbVI90,and#hoMd her mad miny ng F1DF i 6Td' Beginning July 1,2015 please send Al remittRKe 10 Micndel8$kOr hiteffetlarial,Incas rrotad below. The Rasaderjlar=kboxisnolonger etceptii igparrnlilts anaayow -_heck will twretumecL ft wr ddPrefei-Paymentr.%aL-&'FtrrwkrraoTsferrfaraflpas-vbee. Fi rn�rT(nnsfer- Ea�ment VU Lombox: Michael Sakef Interrm Nonai,Inc. I'd icl-aet Baker lritevietinnA.Inc- CitizEns$Qnk PO®ax 5l5T4 AU 036-r3 -F5D -os AnOtm CA 9000-5195 Account: 61-Or7t097i 5VAFT_CT71OS33 Michael Oaker Intrmatlonai,Inc.ttx ID riumbw-?5r-1226638 Thank you for the coritlmmd cppoartunity to work with you andprovijo tire ser-4rces yauneed t =daii,ar YOU pro,eCtS SLK Cc Ilya We anjoy w+orkinF you aryd loner forwoud.u+aur fu tore partner-sihips` 5incereCy, .e-'' �- Todd Lynn Ace Frasiderr-Finance 9XIWNStNKwirdSEMI FacgHdo" 19 �t K �rwtl.cow WRtx.ullog 53mIF&.:aiz3153l&D 7 Item No . 5 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Environmental Science Associates for the Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Old Town Boutique Hotel PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Environmental Science Associates, in the amount of $129,100, with a 10% contingency of $12,910, for a total agreement of $142,010, for the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Old Town Boutique Hotel. BACKGROUND: The City is currently processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of five-story, 151 guest room boutique hotel and an adjacent five story, 204 stall parking garage in Old Town along Third Street. To complete the necessary environmental review for the proposed development, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), ESA will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Old Town Specific Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. Sufficient funds have been deposited in account 001.2982 by the applicant to cover the costs of the Addendum to the EIR. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED OLD TOWN BOUTIQUE HOTEL THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of September 27, 2016, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Environmental Science Associates, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on September 27, 2016, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2017, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed one hundred twenty-nine thousand one hundred dollars ($129,100.00), plus 10% Contingency if applicable of twelve thousand nine hundred ten dollars ($12,910.00) for a total Agreement amount of one hundred forty-two thousand ten dollars ($142,010.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional Liability Coverage: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Environmental Science Associates Attn: Eric Ruby 550 West C Street, Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 14. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub-contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non-substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non-monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Bobbette Biddulph, Senior Vice President ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk Eric Ruby, Senior Vide President APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Environmental Science Associates Attn: Eric Ruby 550 West C Street, Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 619.719.4200 eruby@esassoc.com PM Initials Date: ( EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: r ESA Community 550 West CStreet www.esassoc.com Development Suite 750 J San Diego,CA 92101 619.719.4200 phone 619.719.4201 fax July 21,2016 Mr.Eric Jones Associate Planner City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Subject: Proposal for Preparation of a Supplemental EIR for The Boutique Hotel in Old Town Temecula Dear Eric: ESA is pleased to submit this proposal for the preparation of a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for The Boutique Hotel in Old Town, to be located on Third Street between Mercedes Avenue and Front Street. Qualifications ESA has prepared over 8,000 planning and CEQA documents in its 45-year history. With over 400 employees located throughout California,Oregon,Washington and Florida,ESA has the technical expertise to produce large and small scale CEQA documents on schedule and within budget. ESA has extensive experience with preparing documentation for non-residential developments throughout Southern California and Riverside County in particular.In addition,ESA staff has a comprehensive understanding of City of Temecula CEQA and entitlement processing requirements,having prepared more than 10 CEQA documents for the city.ESA also understands and works with surrounding jurisdictions including water and school districts as well as state and federal regulatory agencies. Eric J.Ruby will serve as project director,and has a keen understanding of CEQA documentation and entitlement processing requirements. Mr. Ruby has over 30 years of planning and CEQA documentation expertise with projects located throughout Southern California, Riverside County and the City of Temecula. Mr. Jack Gorzeman,AICP,ASLA,will function as the project manager. Jack is currently serving as Project Manager for the Altair project within Temecula, and has lead the CEQA effort for other projects that include Audi of Temecula and Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. In addition,ESA authored the EIR for the 2010 update to the Old Town Specific Plan. This work included the assessment of cultural and biological resources, air quality, noise, greenhouse gas emissions, aesthetics, and traffic. As such, ESA has a deep understanding of the environmental constraints associated with the redevelopment of Old Town. ESACommunity Development J Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 2 Project Understanding The applicant proposes to build a six-story, 151-guest room boutique hotel and an adjacent five-story,204-stall parking garage in Old Town Temecula, on approximately 1.8 gross acres. The proposed hotel is within the Old Town Specific Plan and is located in the Downtown Core District but outside of the Hotel Overlay District. The Downtown Core District allows hotels up to four stories in height.The Hotel Overlay District allows hotels with conference facilities up to eight stories in height. The intent of the applicant is to request an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to place a Hotel Overlay District classification over the proposed hotel development area and reduce the amount of land area within the existing Hotel Overlay District,accordingly. Based on a review of the application materials,past CEQA documentation,and discussions with city staff,only minor changes to the previously certified Old Town Specific Plan EIR would be necessary to address the impacts of the proposed project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15163, a Supplemental EIR is the appropriate document to respond to these minor project-specific changes. Scope of Work This scope of work has been developed based upon discussions with city staff, available project documents and information, CEQA statute and guidelines, and City of Temecula CEQA thresholds of significance. It assumes that project description details including engineering,architecture,landscape architecture and land planning will be provided by the applicant's team along with supportive engineering technical studies such as a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan and grading and drainage plans. In addition, it is assumed that the city will be responsible for Native American coordination under Assembly Bill 52(AB52). Task 1 : Project Management and Coordination ESA will review the existing data and past documents pertaining to the proposed project,as well as any additional data that becomes available as we proceed with the environmental review process. ESA will coordinate with the city on schedules and sharing of information through regular review of the proposed project. ESA will also prepare a detailed project description, in consultation with the city planner which describes the characteristics and specifications of the proposed project. Project management/coordination and attendance at meetings will occur under this task. We anticipate approximately 12 hours per month for project management/coordination for the duration of the project(estimated 9 months). We have also included costs for a scoping meeting and conference calls with the city and the project team and attendance at a Planning Commission and City Council public hearing. I ESA Community I Development Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 3 Task 2; Draft Supplemental EIR ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft SEIR for review by the city and the project team. The Administrative Draft SEIR will be prepared in accordance with the provisions of Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines.The level of specificity of an EIR is determined by the nature of the project and the rule of reason. The Draft SEIR will incorporate by reference relevant analysis of environmental topics considered in the Old Town Specific Plan(Clearinghouse No.2015051024).Based on a cursory comparison of the project with the Old Town Specific Plan EIR referenced above,it would appear that the Draft SEIR should provide a focused,updated analysis on the following key environmental issues which could have significant impacts associated with the project: aesthetics,cultural resources,land use and planning,and transportation and traffic. These selected issues will be refined/confirmed through discussions with the city prior to proceeding with the analysis. Notice of Preparation / Scoping In the interest of time and based on the nature of the project, it is recommended that an Initial Study not be prepared as part of the Notice of Preparation(NOP). ESA will prepare a draft NOP for review by the city.Upon review, ESA will incorporate any edits and provide the city with an electronic copy for distribution. ESA will submit the required copies of the NOP to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to the trustee and responsible agencies. The city will be responsible for distributing the NOP to selected local, regional, state, and federal agencies and interested parties. The city will also be responsible for any noticing in the local newspaper and on the project site. ESA will assist the city in conducting a scoping meeting for the project.It is anticipated that the NOP will include information on the date,time,and location of the scoping meeting. Deliverables: I electronic copy of the NOP; 15 copies of the NOP for SCH; PowerPoint slides for scoping meeting The following outline provides the proposed organization of the Draft SEIR: • Executive Summary: The Executive Summary is intended to encapsulate the entire Draft SEIR in order to provide a quick understanding of the project's potential impacts. It will identify,in an overview fashion,the proposed project under consideration and its objectives including any design features of the project that will be implemented. The Executive Summary will briefly discuss the environmental impacts associated with project implementation(whether beneficial or adverse,significant as well as insignificant),and will contain a summary analysis of the alternatives to the proposed project. • Section 1.0—Introduction/Summary: The introduction will include the purpose of a SEIR and procedural information.This section will also summarize the proposed project's impacts and mitigation measures. • Section 2.0-Project Description:The project description will be based on information provided by City of Temecula and will include the project location and setting, site characteristics, project objectives and the characteristics of the project. This section will also include the requested permits and approvals for the I ES A Community t1 I Development Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 4 proposed project. • Section 3.0—Environmental Setting,Impacts,and Mitigation Measures: For each potentially significant environmental issue identified in the NOP, this section of the SEIR will include a discussion of the environmental setting, project impacts, cumulative impacts, project design features, level of significance before mitigation, mitigation measures, and the level of significance after mitigation. The assessment of impacts will be consistent with CEQA requirements and will utilize defined thresholds of significance to determine the impacts of the proposed project. • Section 4.0 — Other CEQA Considerations: ESA will prepare the following CEQA-required analysis sections:significant irreversible environmental changes and growth-inducing impacts. • Section 5.0—Alternatives:Alternatives will be established in discussions between ESA and the city.For the purposes of this proposal,a total of two alternatives in addition to the mandatory no project alternative will be considered in this section of the SEIR. For each alternative, a description of the alternative, consideration of the alternative's feasibility in relation to the basic objectives of the project(established by the applicant and the city),and a comparative analysis of the environmental impacts attributable to the alternative versus those associated with the proposed project for each of the environmental issues discussed above will be provided. Consideration of any further alternatives that may be required will result in modifications to the project budget. • Section 7.0—Persons and Organizations Consulted/References:ESA will prepare this section of the SEIR to document all persons and sources that contributed to the environmental analysis,and the references cited in the SEIR. Subsequent to city review of the Administrative Draft SEIR, ESA will incorporate any comments and prepare a Screencheck Draft SEIR for submittal to the City and the project team.We assume that changes will be minimal due to early consultation with the City,and previous approval of technical reports by City personnel. Subsequent to review by the city and the project team of the Screencheck Draft SEIR,ESA will prepare the Draft SEIR which incorporates final changes. We assume that changes will be minimal due to early consultation with the city,previous approval of technical reports by city personnel, and submittal of the Screencheck Draft SEIR. Copies of the Draft SEIR, including technical appendices, will be provided for to the city for distribution. ESA will prepare the Notice of Completion(NOC)and submit the required copies to the State Clearinghouse.The city will be responsible for distributing the NOP to selected local,regional, state,and federal agencies and interested parties.The city will also be responsible for any noticing in the local newspaper and on the project site. Deliverables—I editable version and 5 copies of Administrative Draft SEIR;I pdf version and 5 copies of Screencheck Draft SEIR;I pdf, 5 copies, and 25 CDs of Draft SEIR. r ESA Community Development J Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 5 Task 3: Final Supplemental EIR / Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program At the conclusion of the public review period,ESA will work with the city to obtain all comments received on the Draft SEIR.An Administrative Final SEIR containing proposed responses to comments and revisions to the Draft SEIR, where required, will be prepared once all comments are received. It is assumed that if required, the applicant's technical consultants will provide input to the responses to comment letters,as needed. It is difficult to predict public reaction to the Draft SEIR at this time. For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that public reaction to the document will be limited to a maximum of 10 comment letters. In the event that the public comments on the Draft SEIR are greater than expected, ESA will meet with the city to adjust the work program/budget as necessary.An Administrative Final SEIR will be submitted to the city for review. Upon incorporation of comments on the Administrative Final SEIR,ESA will prepare a Screencheck Final SEIR for submittal to the city and project team. ESA assumes that comments on the Screencheck Final EIR will be minimal due to early consultation with the city and the applicant when comments were received. Subsequent to city review of the Screencheck Final SEIR, ESA will prepare the Final SEIR. ESA will also prepare a draft Findings of Fact. It is understood that ESA would only prepare the Statement of Overriding Considerations as an optional task. The city will be responsible for distributing the Final SEIR to agencies that commented on the Draft SEIR at least 10 days prior to the certification of the SEIR by the city. Deliverables: I editable version and 5 copies of Administrative Final EIR; 1 pdf version of the Screencheck Final SEIR;5 copies and 25 CDs of Final EIR ESA will prepare a detailed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in accordance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines in response to any significant environmental impacts that may be identified to result from the proposed development. A draft MMRP will be submitted with the Administrative Draft Final SEIR. Deliverables: I editable version of Draft MMRP;5 copies of Final MMRP Upon project approval by the city,ESA will assist the city in filing a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk.This notice should be filed within 5 days of project approval. I ES A Community I 1� Development Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 6 Task 4: Focused Studies As required per the mitigation measures in the certified 2010 Old Town Specific Plan EIR, focused studies for cultural resources and traffic -,vill be conducted as part of this scope of work. The details of these studies are outlined below. Cultural Resources Assessment Background The proposed project would construct two new buildings, including a parking garage on the north side of 3rd Street and a hotel on the south side of 3rd Street. The new parking garage will be constructed on an empty lot adjacent to two commercial structures,at least one of which is over 45-years in age,while the new hotel would occupy multiple parcels across an entire city block that is currently improved with multiple one- and two-story commercial buildings, at least two of which appear to be over 45-years in age. Because there are existing improvements over 45 years in age located within and adjacent to the project site,these resources will need to be evaluated and the potential for direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to historical resources will need to be analyzed, per Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a. Further, an archaeological inventory will need to be conducted per Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a. The study area for historical resources includes 28676 Front Street, also known as the Clogstone Restaurant, located west of the proposed parking garage. The Building is listed as an individual property eligible for local listing(California Historical Resource Status Code: 5S2)in the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment,Temecula, Riverside County, California. The Clogstone Restaurant was opened by Sara and Charles Clogstone in 1897. However, the current building replaced the original in 1932. Within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property,there are approximately 10 additional properties identified in the Old Town Specific Plan as potentially significant for local,state,or national listing. Seven are eligible for the National Register and five are eligible for local designation(including Clogstone Restaurant). Furthermore,there are two buildings located on the south side of 3rd Street on the project site,identified through historical aerial imagery, which have not been previously evaluated but appear to be over 45 years old. The proposed project would demolish these structures; therefore further evaluation of the structures is required to determine if the Project would result in a significant impact to historic resources.ESA architectural historians will survey, research and document the construction, alterations, property and occupancy history of the subject buildings and evaluate their integrity and significance against applicable national, state and city evaluation criteria. The assessment is necessary to meet basic CEQA requirements and to satisfy local organization and agency expectations for a historical assessment. To address Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a for archaeological resources, and Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a for architectural resources,ESA proposes the following tasks: I ESA Community I Development Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 7 Records Search,Archival Research and NAHC Outreach ESA cultural resources staff will request a records search from the Eastern Information Center (SCIC) at the University of California Riverside for the Project area,including a 1-mile buffer.The records search will provide information on previous cultural resources investigations and previously recorded archaeological and historic- period built resources within the Project area. In addition, ESA will assemble and analyze pertinent research material to document the history, construction, and alterations of the project site and surrounding associated community. Focused site-specific research may include but may not be limited to review of available building permits provided by the client, Sanborn Maps, and city directories. Research will be conducted at the City of Temecula Department of Building and Safety,Riverside County Assessor, Temecula Valley Historical Society, Temecula Valley Museum,Temecula Public Library,relevant internet sites,and other archives to be identified as applicable. In addition, ESA will review any previous evaluations of the project site on file at the City of Temecula. ESA staff will also request a search of the Sacred Lands File(SLF)at the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Included in the response will be a list of local Native American contacts who may have knowledge of resources in the project area.These will be provided to the city for use in the AB52 consultation efforts. Conduct Field Studies ESA cultural resources staff will conduct a site inspection and field survey of the project site. One architectural historian and one archaeologist will conduct the survey. The site visit will include an intensive-level survey of the project site and the immediate surrounding vicinity. All survey work shall be consistent with procedures previously established by local, state, and federal guidelines for conducting historic preservation work. Given the developed nature of the area, it is anticipated that the archaeological component of the survey will be reconnaissance in nature, focused primarily on above-ground resources or infrastructure. Any previously undocumented built resources or newly identified archaeological resources will be mapped using sub-meter GPS,photo-documented with digital camera,and documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 site record forms. While several architectural resources occur within or adjacent to the project site and will need to be documented, we assume that no archaeological resources will be identified. However, if archaeological resources are identified,any subsequent treatment and evaluation that might be required would be covered under a separate scope and cost. Historical Resources Technical Report ESA will prepare a Historic Resources Technical Report documenting the results of the historical resources investigations and providing the necessary conclusions and recommendations. Given the need to both document and evaluate built resources, this will be a standalone report separate from the archaeological resources inventory report (Task 4). The report will include the following: methods, regulatory setting, and historic context, architectural description, integrity analysis, statement of significance, impacts analysis, and recommended mitigation measures (if necessary). ESA will prepare a Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR523A) Primary Form and(DPR523B)BSO Form recording the survey and evaluation findings. ESA will r ESA Community Development J Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 8 also prepare a CEQA impacts analysis examining potential direct, indirect, and cumulative project impacts to historical resources, if any, against state and local thresholds. ESA will incorporate the results of the impacts analysis into the Historic Resources Technical Report, including project impacts, selected alternative, and cumulative impacts. ESA will respond to and incorporate one set of client and city review comments on the Draft report and DPR Forms,and prepare a Final report and DPR Forms. Given the potential for significant historical buildings, ESA will review study findings with the client at key intervals by email and telephone during project progress. Upon completion of the Draft Historical Resources Technical Report, ESA will discuss report findings and recommendations with the client over the telephone and/or by email prior to submittal to the city. ESA has included an allowance of 3.5 staff hours under this task for in-house coordination and client/city meetings by telephone. Archaeological Resources Inventory Report The results of the background studies, SLF search, and archaeological field survey will be summarized in a standalone Archaeological Resources Technical Report.Included will be a summary of previous studies and any recorded archaeological resources within the project area, a summary of the results of the field survey, and a discussion of the overall sensitivity of the project area for archaeological resources. Recommendations for any additional studies that might be required will also be provided, if appropriate. ESA will respond to and incorporate one set of client and city review comments on the Draft report to prepare the Final report. Traffic Impact Analysis As required in Mitigation Measure 3.9-1,a project-level Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA)will be prepared for the proposed project.ESA's traffic sub-consultant,Linscott,Law,and Greenspan(LLG),will prepare the TIA.The scope of this analysis is outlined below. Project Mobilization • Confirm the development description,work schedule, and assumptions to be utilized in the traffic study with the client.Discuss assumptions to be used associated with the project completion year.Obtain a current project site plan that illustrates the access scheme to the project site in both hard copy and digital formats. • Prepare a scoping agreement for review by the city. • Contact City of Temecula staff to discuss the project and analysis criteria, confirm the study approach, identify pertinent traffic issues and concerns,and formalize the Scope of Work for the traffic study. Data Collection and Research • Visit the project study area to confirm existing conditions with respect to existing site development, local area development, site access,parking use, and areas of congestion in order to verify our overall understanding of traffic conditions in the area that might affect this project. I ECA Community I 17 Development Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 9 • Document the existing roadway striping,traffic control measures,curbside parking restrictions,adjacent intersection configurations,and other pertinent roadway features. • Conduct AM peak period and PM peak period traffic volume counts at up to eight (8) study area intersections.The traffic counts will be conducted between the hours of 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM.These traffic volume data will be utilized in the traffic impact analysis for the project. • Conduct 24-hour machine traffic counts(ADT's)at up to three(3)study street segments. • Research data at the City of Temecula and obtain recent traffic impact studies prepared for developments in the project vicinity that may contribute to cumulative impacts at the study area locations. Trip Generation,Distribution,and Assignment • Prepare a trip generation forecast for the proposed project for a typical weekday over a 24-hour period, as well as for the commuter AM and PM peak hours. Appropriate trip generation credits will also be applied for the existing land uses on site,mixed-use development,and transit,if applicable. • Distribute and assign the forecasted AM and PM peak hour trips expected to be generated by the proposed project to the study intersections based on existing and anticipated traffic patterns to and from the project site and input from city staff. • Prepare trip generation forecasts for the cumulative projects for a typical weekday over a 24-hour period,as well as for the commuter AM and PM peak hours.The AM and PM peak hour trips expected to be generated by the cumulative projects will be distributed and assigned to the local street system. • Apply a growth factor to the counts to represent opening year conditions. • Develop existing, existing plus project, opening year without project, opening year plus project, and opening year plus project plus cumulative projects traffic volume forecasts, representing the near-term scenarios. Near-Term Project Evaluation and Mitigation Analysis • Prepare AM peak hour and PM peak hour Level of Service(LOS)calculations at the study intersections for the five(5)near-term scenarios outlined above. • Assess the impact of the project based on the results of the peak hour intersection analyses, the city's LOS standards and application of the city's significance criteria. Based on this assessment, determine which intersections(if any)are significantly impacted by the proposed project. ESACommunity Development J Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 10 • Identify mitigation measures for each significant impact, which may include intersection and/or signalization improvements, segment improvements, striping modifications, the addition of auxiliary turn lanes,traffic control/limitations at site access points,etc. Please note that this proposal assumes the recommended mitigation measures can be adequately described within the text of the report. • Prepare fair share calculations for each significant impact. Site Access and Circulation Review • Review the proposed site plan and provide recommendations to address any concerns regarding site access and circulation. Provide recommendations regarding the location of site access driveways, the number of driveways,potential turn restrictions,and connectivity with the internal site circulation system. Also recommend control type and right-turn/left-turn lanes as necessary. • Discuss the project's potential impacts to pedestrians,bicycle and transit circulation. Preparation of the Traffic Impact Study • Prepare a draft traffic impact study in report format that details all of the above-mentioned items, our analysis, findings and conclusions. The draft report will be suitably documented with tabular, graphic and appendix materials. The draft traffic study will be submitted for your review and by appropriate members of the project team. • Prepare one(1)set of revisions based on city comments and resubmit. No new analysis is budgeted. Attendance at Meetings • This proposal assumes preparation for and attendance by LLG staff at one(1)meeting with the project team and/or city staff. EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule I Lac A Community I ESADevelopment J Mr.Eric Jones July 21,2016 Page 11 Schedule An estimated timeline schedule is provided at the end of this proposal. Cost The fee for the above scope of work is on a time and materials basis,not-to-exceed$129,100.A detailed cost breakdown is shown below. COST ESTIMATE THE BOUTIQUE HOTEL OLD TOWN TEMECULA SEIR TASK COST Task 1—Project Management and Coordination $24,650 Task 2—Draft Supplemental EIR $46,500 Task 3—Final Supplemental EIR $15,500 Task 4—Focused Studies Cultural Resources Assessment $24,260 Traffic Impact Analysis $16,390 Reimbursable Expenses(in-house copying,mileage,postage,etc.) $ 300 Document Reproduction $ 1,500 Total $129,100 We look forward to working with you on this project.Please feel free to contact Eric Ruby at eruby@esassoc.com or me at jgorzeman@esassoc.com,or by phone at 619-719-4200 if you should have any questions. Sincerely, �Ja#skor� Jack A.Gorzeman,AICP,ASLA Senior Managing Associate Item No . 6 Approvals City Attorney A?_ Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Riverside County Flood Control District and Frontier Communications to Place a Frontier Communications Utility Line Within City-Owned Property PREPARED BY: Amer Attar— Principal Engineer Jon Salazar, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the three-way Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Riverside County Flood Control District and Frontier Communications to place a Frontier Communications utility line within City-owned property. BACKGROUND: Riverside County Flood Control District (District) is the local sponsor of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project (Project). During the course of construction, the contractor for the Project located unmarked utility lines that conflicted with the proposed creek improvements located in an area on the east side of the creek, just north of the Main Street bridge. In order to remove the lines from conflict, the owner of these lines, Frontier Communications, is required to relocate them outside the construction area. Frontier Communications wishes to relocate its facilities within adjacent City-owned property, APN 922- 036-043, currently occupied by the Pennypickle's Workshop. Frontier Communications and the City have agreed in concept that the new relocated lines will run adjacent to the Pennypickle's Workshop parking lot and to the west of its most westerly curb. The only potential impact to the Pennypickle's Workshop parking is when Frontier Communications reconnects the new line to the manhole that exists in the parking lot. The City will review Frontier Communications' relocation plans and will make sure they are acceptable to the City. Ordinarily, the placement of a utility line within City property requires granting the easement after its acquisition by the utility purveyor. Due to the time sensitive nature of the relocation efforts with regard to the overall progress of the Project, this MOU is being implemented as a temporary measure. The approval of the MOU will allow the relocation of the Frontier Communications lines to proceed while the permanent solution of appraising the easement value, executing a Purchase and Sale Agreement, and recording the easement is carried out. FISCAL IMPACT: The approval of the MOU has no fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum of Understanding 2. Location Map Memorandum of Understanding Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project Phase II Project - Frontier Communications Utility Conflict The Riverside County Flood Control District(District), City of Temecula(City) and Frontier Communications (Frontier)hereby agree as follows. RECITALS A. The District is the Local Sponsor of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) project, namely, Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project (Murrieta Creek). Construction of Murrieta Creek Phase II is currently underway in the City of Temecula. B. On or about May 2, 2016, USACE's construction contractor, OHL, USA , located unmarked utility lines (fiber optic cables) within Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 922-036-036. These facilities are in conflict with the proposed construction of Murrieta Creek, Phase II. C. The District owns APN 922-036-036 in fee. Frontier claims ownership of the unmarked utility line. D. In a letter dated May 3, 2016 (attached), the District ordered Frontier to relocate the conflicting portions of the utility lines. E. Frontier has no rights to locate utility lines within the District's parcel and, therefore, must relocate its facilities outside the District's parcel. F. Frontier wishes to relocate its facilities within adjacent City-owned property, APN 922-036- 043 ("City Property"). G. Time is of the essence in this matter. Now, therefore, the District, City and Frontier agree as follows: I. Frontier shall: 1. Provide City with a plat and legal description for the desired utility easement. 2. Obtain an appraisal for the easement and submit an offer to the City to purchase said easement. 3. Upon City's approval of the plat, legal description and offer to purchase, pay City the mutually agreed price for the easement. 4. Frontier's relocation of its utility lines shall conform with all applicable design guidelines and standards established by the City. II. Cil. shall: 1. Review and, if appropriate, approve Frontier's plat, legal and utility relocation plan. 2. Review Frontier's offer to purchase and, if it is found acceptable, submit said offer to the City Council for approval. 3. At its sole discretion, allow Frontier to proceed with the utility relocation plan provided. 4. Upon City Council approval of Frontier's offer to purchase, record or cause the easement to be recorded in the Official Records. 5. Inspect construction of the relocated utility. III. District shall: 1. Work cooperatively with Frontier and the City to facilitate the necessary utility relocation in the shortest possible time frame. 2. Stake the property line to the east adjacent to the City's Children's Museum. 3. Maintain the USACE and OHL,USA apprised of the status of the relocation work. By way of this MOU, the City hereby grants to Frontier a license to use the City Property for the relocation at its sole risk prior to completion of the process to grant the permanent easement. The person or persons executing this MOU on behalf of Frontier warrant and represent that he or she has the authority to execute this MOU on behalf of Frontier and has the authority to bind Frontier to the performance of its obligations hereunder. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By WV15�N� T- 6- 0016 Veeral bN E.UHL L Mana -Chief Engineer CITY OF TEMECULA By MICHAEL S.NAGGAR Mayor Attest RANDI JOHL City Clerk Attest PETER M. THORSON City Attorney FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS By HARM ET KAUR Engineer IV WARREN D.WILLIAMS 1995 MARKET STREET General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 FAX 951.788.9965 www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT May 3, 2016 Ms, Harmeet Kaur Frontier Communications 9 South 4"' Street Redlands, CA 92373-4738 Dear Ms. Kaur: Re: Utility Relocation Murrieta Creek Phase 2 Project No. 7-8-00021 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(District)and U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (COE) are currently constructing the Murrieta Creek Phase 2 project within the city of Temecula. Recently,while preparing to construct a soil cement channel wall,the project contractor,OHL USA Inc. (Contractor), discovered two 4" Verizon Conduits located within the District's right of way. The line will be in conflict with the shoring and proposed alignment at approximately Station 82+50 through Station 80+60 on the east side of the project,shown on Sheet C-10 of the enclosed COE's design plans. The District requests Frontier Communications to relocate the conflicting portion of the conduit lines prior to the Contractor's construction of the soil cement channel walls, and is scheduled to work in that area on Monday, May 16, 2016. With construction moving at an accelerated rate, please provide the District with an expedited utility relocation schedule as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact me at 951.955.0087 or 909.560.1147 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, RU BARES Utility Liaison Enclosures ec: Alberto Martinez Kelly O'Sullivan RT:bjp P8/204414 t,r C3 -. , X43`G __ ��, ;� le `, � .q�, `� �,y�":�,� 'F"_.,r � �' � +'•'r � r r ri f _ a ell NT v _ IN 4i a' IL 'ss Found Conduits e � I REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REPORT (RFI) RFRFI_NO. PAGE NO. NO. Page 1 of 1 CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT TITLE PRIME CONTRACTOR US Army Corps W912PL-15-C-0002 NA Murrieta Creek Phase 2 OHL USA,Inc. of Engineers Contractor's Request for Information REQUESTED BY: DATE REQUESTED: Potential Cost Impact[Yes] Joanna Banayotidis May 02,2016 Potential Schedule Impact[Yes] RFI SUBJECT: Utility Line within ROW FEATURE OF WORK: 006 Shoring DRAWINGS: C10 INFORMATION REQUESTED: The Contractor came across a utility line that is within the Construction ROW and in conflict with the shoring and soil cement operations.The line leads into a Verizon vault which is filled with water.The utility line is located on the East side of the creek at approx..Sta. 82+50-80+60.Attached are some pictures and sheet C-10 of the contract drawings,showing the area in question. Please advise on how to proceed. ATTACHMENTS FROM CONTRACTOR:(2 attachments) Sheet C10.pdf Pictures.pdf Government Response ANSWERED BY: DATE RECEIVED: DATE ANSWERED: TITLE: May 02,2016 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR: NOTE: THE RFI SYSTEM IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT MECHANISM FOR RESPONDING TO CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR QA REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE DATE INFORMATION. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH ADDITIONAL WORK. IF THE CONTRACTOR CONSIDERS THE RFI RESPONSE A CHANGED CONDITION,PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT PROVISIONS. RFI FORM V N! I- 7 SOL CEMENT BAH+[ PRCIIECr10N : s � m$ TOP OF Easrlw ESr o $ g EL,10Os.0s LEGEN 1610 CHANNEL-S:I OPE v STA]9-57.11 PROTECT IN PLACE STA S�E0.0U €%sSnNC wK1RN LE V.g06.0a t \J v.10dy.aa ELEv.:OdS-3? m w 4. 75 PAN. CE SOFFET EL€VA-1ION 1000 L v T 1 = BRI 1()00 C G1'ANNEL Y L. -4 - RIPPRIAY F v A. 2 CORRIDOR ww 9tc.. t W -� A ESm% n EXISTING LROVNO o[ W R!w 15 "MAINr R7w ? m,.. J -- 4a Pa _u� 990 - • � xxl r ___ _a_-____,___ w --- et_ _ __-_ 77'� SOIL CCMENT. __EL-96a.7e _ __ _ - - I' BERM ' 5•0-0 ZO COMPAG IEd L� Y1 SHOR- v.ST a 55FEEL.STR T4MAL ELEY.979.74 pESNiM rN(R ESE v.677.79 & y' S` C 980 T❑❑pp OP 55 98d i Vu vm G EhI�N7 u _w ss.5•To7o• ass rcao 4 97F - 976 ;Y• U'y 89.00 88.00 87.00 80.00 85.00 84.00 83.00 92.00 31-40 40•C0 79.00 78.00 SM x PFR, FIJf. EmSr NEw POWER POLE LOWON _ o ,p vERT 'Sc ALE Rrv.•SFT {�y� -N T 4 07 :❑ TYPICAL CROSS_SECYION O exp G' wORIP'SCALE se.•5Or' � V l � T T� E 287 Sa a yK4 ry i 5 •~ EA57 SIDE SHORW LIWTS EAST SIDE SHORN(. •i. f Sia.9 •20 O'S A84.4Q p ,yf�j'-'♦rte'I ,�. _ 1NOTES- ;E €3 a p a � � F'r� - 2 tom- I�`^� ,�� q GOPISTRUG i10N NC}T€5- `tt r 1 1S ®ECONST RV T C;N t?j[TION Wrq 500.CEMENT M� .LP.1 •4 SCCEppNNTS5ION NT.YE SNEEI CW oOR TYPIC,SL in }l• ' "15 { I - ® SMEEI Bcii OR OET�SrY>:R'i SEE W - x L TOP DE E+TST g%95TIN" IGGMrs 5 F•ISi'ALL 0057 Al°G CABLE FENCE•SEE SM[Er Cx �� SLOPE P[]wER;v�LES [P _ [ cFpOR UEUT�At p� p [ u E N f _ _.._ l `R w- gax -'€x '--' 1 nvI+,ANNE0. - -1 U ❑5 5EE 91EETr55G&&•CB�ORATFrLLS 1 -��^Ig �,. ❑ 1 145£RUCi MAIN TiNATaCE R4W•p([COMPOS£d B Z _ _ - -RV - BEMrI-P" T2 RINS"MCE �pRFAC�G ON wESi 3tgf,ASPMAL7 ��f d* 5 DETAILS ET ILS E155T SIDE.HE SI+f:T C36 FOR ffi 2 I y' -^ s 'moi•• - 1❑ BANK LANf)SCa Wq. M 4MADNEL IT ,r,x - rRi-A RE T 76 INESTALLLN�CMANNEL w[vrOEErA-0ON.SEE SKET ECR-1 +-f. 3.977.]6L r yf 1T Sr Aj7-DATE AS AN7TWITT-YNNTINAANCE ROW. -7 al0p �r f e 7 � q IE,6 v76 R- - 2,,�• 19 TEMPORARY GERM p n g. -•-, mu-I w � E NOV w_ P y z a ANNEL 6.rISF ALL PAST C E FE AT P CHANNEL WALL S cc o '�:O BF''GINISISRI -MAINT ArIECI _ TBOYM SIQE S]A7 FAABL r 9r•p N ' S€CT'ON 9 8 - a .. L-.V N0 74.40 E 00 n _ REFERENCE N07E - e♦T; � E • - a±91f�9a1 NI] - MAN�•I O:�I, FOR 5CME0E iSTOP OF WEST Cr.pYe[fi IQEi C28 wd C29 amSLOPE 2RSC7W �N i� r 19 �.. G CHANNEL E CURVE flair. 88 9 r PI.STATKM .07.27 81.53,85 78.70.14 � 7•?O'O8'• q•tr00'•"K12-46-47 Sol, - J _ - 1.000 Qi m 1 F. 4.000' 400' . .�.1u j L• r2ff.0r 82.Oa' 223AS' y ExIST.VVOwER a .�P,PY S d+ S nP'T p0 T• f f.09-9' 46.22 111.99' K 2 1x3 624, '-• g• - E 6 267 203. �ea cµOROG 9' I STN T9 Fr CRAPMI SCALE ELAN g �i QST "(5 �� 50 P5 D 30 100Fr SCALE IN.-SOP T. +v •� gsN5gp()80 SCALE! I'•SO' ASatcrrp C-14 are., ywlwc+.aos e wl'+�lu V 3 +� Y RAV _ 4 _ _".,. `['1 4� �` � �. •771„ `1��►��'A �1t.. � ..- _ -. - "' . ., 'S-�,. .T "�+[7� - r a .-�;b�r try :.' �a�.-..,... ...1� � ., .,'. ;.. w"�{� '+ �-:^ ,t`,a"�•�,.,�, , �b .�1 '��k��r;! - .a ,. w iirr..�.e a .G_�Ir �1 - -' -. a �•��'�� f.,..[k � $ Jy4•.: c y f r, +r�;r' , s"�' .. ',WO. c� _ a .� �.• ,�+teij,-#, ,� t l�` ,� r.YJ Y -_:C . i` � - ,,+� Y' S. Y -�J .1 - { ..: �,� ;��: ..th�,�� ••1,; yes V, i ,.. rt; `' r a:. t.�:. '��)J ,� � � ,.; -A. .}' �;LJ" �ti � � � 'tel- � '".�`,�� rA ;•f:_ �a'� �rpq� �?\ - -� .�. r ..4,,�, •-ti' .�a-� is l t.�� - � �,'4.-:,, _ k�-►' /�'..°��r i _ ;'�� .rf _ _ L� 14 j �`�'1� � �ac� moi• �v- a��.�• '� ,Y �� +�A {� � r yk; �; � J art,, V" - j ir. •t„>k, •a.'�a 'n _�� f � �' -}'` �-- d r T>' 1. L.. `a i�;�; 1 a1, ., m t r M1h.4� � ,e d•♦. ti'r ey'14 � ��►:•��ti 'C`��'1''' 4:; �`: licr • �' ,�. ki ��, .. .� � '[Tek �' _ r t MY ski, S �Y+,,,. l -Y �1 �� r` � x ; .,.7 ;/a Y-f.. P,�.* � ,-.ail-{•,^y�r •:',r $,fir �"s.G. y �'''�1 \'�� .y��',' q.'n''"y`-r,��,y�: 4 .� f a t a 7 i I r �� r.� ; � .� n�, :' � '/ Y tg_ � I• t 1 s � � i raw !�. • { �A/,i-f r Cv '�4 .. 3 �•. �\ayrrr�' D 1r` � f ye, � .t: � �/. `� �`y�i�'- Ii• � � �ar •-� � _ 'fib;. '��r�. !. fid• �j° dJl. 14�/i- 1l 4 ' r ` �t �. r { ♦ r r af'4 u 'thin N,r41 .� y{f i 174 r 19i 4 •f� A. J _ -i, IE •�4,. 1��"a 4 lsl, « •V it ' •'•ia'r,l�,�4��• 'w �� . .�� •� ^:a. ��,�Ir' ti'.�1.�' � � �7` .P i �! �..4' �•T'' j U• „ �'��12 �`r�I '!I, Cr`S All All SLOW pAr : I — 5 t .. al" �yy ��i .`w,d9rWIN y'�.,n i�. f` PF ' 10 � ��.��'�'"�.''-) - �►. y^.- ✓Y ~fL F+yid '`r* wry ��` s, �. f. .rr f.r. � - �•�s'-fir i t � A - '` y.�`, �;�c y:, � .�• �ani. .�: _ oil 3. r ' ,.,.&�. .fir, ,�' ~�• '' _ ' a. Y1P�\ s k •`% 1Gn • y� ...}�}C,� / ! �' '��1. -}W '��y�ti 1.. � - ,"dad. / `•H � �,'.�.� q•«"'Gy�, Y_ ��k9 «• 9� q 'r y,', .7: t7I oi r.� t.t ,� 'q.�+� ,�' ',tc Y-'e• ��. tares. 1,.�s-• 3 ,iii L.f .w� -1. ,t •'•��`Jh ��" �$'� '1,. , �,,.. , � � ,�., ,F .{.,4�r.. �'- � 44�.' � .�SY �- i ' "+ 'F' wt - .{.:_;c�t;',a.{f ;,'' n.r� ' 'F t,, ti �:'�r / � � •� 1��:, �� ,e-;'' � Pr,�� •w�Y ' lr a- � _,�i{ �t t ;q+:KF,+tx.� i� �s` _!'�. �t, b ,y :, :it i;� t tom•• 1` •nrx i x 3� .' �I`s� �y!-�y"�+-9.5i, a 1 � ai�:�.;`�,� r:j� 'q �?.gA¢ a?� ,�;s '4 -�`, '"X �'�.Y ww.+�' 'y >t � .t.. ""'h�.,•'1�} ,- �`R •lr�', -a6Y�',� �a.,,,/, .- ., o-J,,�:.1,J � ' f � ,,�.'�: {yy `!t"��t. "� �y d 1 �"�' «u'��nh•4t J"�.��u��,� bts ..P:..� 1 ,�,�, 1 'A1F1 4 - fF c .;4, tY1i�" �{ S�. .':� �, U" ''4•�.;. -. h �' S-�.,a- ��. >1`w..�•.4{C4. c"m� �s1 4A�.�.1 S;�:.��,��q} k�i �r.�`rsr,. v _ �r. � .p �.#•. ,1 .A'l' � Yi�-�• '4. - r -;.' _+ ` f '4�,rF' •` �•i'�. ir,.'�4'.. .h.. ,� ;;q 'T ti. ,_,t-r•)�'.i fµ �h '.^ �` ., 1,y,. ;��y f" 4` � � /dot. ;� 1 `"q'.. .� d �� p ."X ;�.�•. � M, '1 Y �� r��.''�//' ', �«,V .t��/e:'u..�'} '�J'. � t�w�t�i�`7.,vL - '.:�i2s. 'r. .n .. t _. F-,x� ��\•;�� ,,.: / � �.+r:;,,+,. 711ecreror Parcel Location - Memorandum of Understanding with 'ilY'?i�thlnu.\.ti.1 pr:.rtnhl..' Riverside Countv Flood Control District Theater- N. Penr?W, c0e S Worksholo Legend f Parcels Highways HWY . INTERCHANGE . INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP USHWY Street Names ' E] Parks E] Schools Hospitals "} Public Facilities City of Temecula Boundary Sphere of Influence Streets <all other values> 4 <Null> COLLECTOR 4 FREEWAY LIMITED SECONDARY ARTERIAL R LOCAL _ MAJOR ARTERIAL r` MODIFIED SECONDARY ARTERI, r -- ti NO CLASSIFCATION ASSIGNED 1: 656 Notes Aid 109.3 0 54.64 109,3 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. ©Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Item No . 7 Approvals City Attorney A� Finance Director City Manager (S� CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for 2016 Autumnfest Events PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the following 2016 Autumnfest Events: GREEK FESTIVAL VETERAN'S DAY PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY BACKGROUND: Three special events scheduled for October and November 2016 necessitate the physical closure of all or portions of certain streets within the Old Town area. The closures are necessary to facilitate the events and protect participants and viewers. The three events and the associated street closures are as follows: 1. GREEK FESTIVAL— October 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th, 2016 The Greek Festival event will be held Saturday, October 15th and 16th at the Town Square Park and Civic Square with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street 12:00 p.m. on Friday, October 14th from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old to Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to 7:00 a.m. on Monday, October 17th Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 12:00 p.m. on Friday, October 14th between Fourth Street and Third Street to 7:00 a.m. on Monday, October 17th 2. VETERAN'S DAY— November 11th, 2016 The Veteran's Day event will be held Friday, November 11th at the Town Square Park and Civic Square with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old on Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Friday, November 11th Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. between Fourth Street and Third Street on Friday, November 11th 3. PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY— November 12th, 2016 The Pechanga Pu'eska Mountain Day event will be held Saturday, November 12th at the Town Square Park and Civic Square with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old on Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Saturday, November 12th Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. between Fourth Street and Third Street on Saturday, November 12th Street closures for the Greek Festival, Veteran's Day and Pechanga Pu'eska Mountain Day events are shown on Exhibit `A' attached hereto. Street closures are allowed by the California Vehicle Code upon approval by the local governing body for certain conditions. Under Vehicle Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways," local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." Chapter 12.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Parades and Special Events, provides standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way and authorizes the City Council or City Manager to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these events. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, as well as services provided by the City Public Works Maintenance Division for providing, placing and retrieving of necessary warning and advisory devices, are appropriately budgeted within the City's operating budget for City-sponsored events. The Greek Festival is not City-sponsored and, therefore, its sponsors will be completely funding the needed support services for this event. ATTACHMENT: Exhibit `A' —Autumnfest Street Closures - 2016 �V 41. 15 Q EVE ITE cb c�F ,�- AUTUMNFEST STREET CLOSURES - 2016 (MAIN STREET AND MERCEDES STREET) * GREEK FES T/VAL - OCTOBER /4 - 17 * VETERAN'S DAY - NOVEMBER H LEGEND * PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DA Y - NOVEMBER /2 STREET CLOSURE BARRICADE EXH/B/T `A TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CONSENT Item No . 8 ACTION MINUTES September 13, 2016 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District meeting convened at 7:53 PM CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, McCracken, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS (None) CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 15 Approve the Action Minutes of August 23, 2016 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0) Director Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Director Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Edwards, McCracken, Naggar Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of August 23, 2016. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:56 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, September 27, 2016, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 082316 1 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Item No . 9 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve the Assessment of Fair Housing for the Community Development Block Grant Program PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING, WITH THE ADDITION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND: The Fair Housing Act of 1968 declares that it is "the policy of the United States to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States" by prohibiting discrimination in housing because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or disability. In addition, the Fair Housing Act requires that the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers programs relating to housing and urban development that affirmatively furthers the policies of the Fair Housing Act. HUD's duty to "affirmatively further fair housing" results in meaningful actions that address disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, create integrated and balanced living patterns, transform racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and foster compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. As an Entitlement Community that receives federal money directly from HUD, the City of Temecula is obligated to also affirmatively further fair housing in accordance with the Fair Housing Act. In July 2015, HUD adopted a final rule on affirmatively furthering fair housing that updated guidelines to achieve this goal. HUD's rule clarifies existing fair housing obligations for HUD grantees to analyze fair housing and set locally-determined fair housing priorities and goals through a newly created Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). HUD provided open data to grantees on patterns of integration, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disproportionate housing needs, and disparities in access to opportunity. The new process, which replaces the previously required Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, requires each program participant to: • Analyze data and engage the community in fair housing planning. • Conduct and submit to HUD an AFH that identifies certain types of fair housing issues in the jurisdiction and region. • Identify significant contributing factors for each fair housing issue identified. • Set fair housing goals for overcoming fair housing issues. • Integrate the goals and priorities established in the AFH into subsequent plans, such as the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans. • Certify that the City will take meaningful actions to further goals identified in the AFH and take no action that is inconsistent with its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. In January 2016, the City entered into an agreement with MDG Associates for the preparation of the Assessment of Fair Housing and 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan. Fair Housing Contributing Factors As part of the Assessment of Fair Housing, HUD requires an analysis and identification of factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of segregation, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disproportionate housing needs, and disparities in access to opportunity. To assist in the identification of any potential fair housing contributing factors, HUD provided over fifteen local and regional maps and fifteen tables on demographics, segregation and integration, concentrated areas of poverty, publicly supported housing, housing burden, disability access, environmental health, and access to transportation. All of the HUD-provided maps and tables can be found in Appendices A and B of the Assessment of Fair Housing. Analysis of the data and further community outreach identified several factors that may contribute to disproportionate housing needs in the community including: • The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes. • Increased demand of affordable housing with supportive services to serve special needs populations. • High demand for affordable housing, due to the high housing costs in the community and the region. • Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations. • Distance from social services. • Architectural barriers for persons with disabilities. • Demand for public transportation. • Proximity of the 1-15 freeway and major arterial corridors. Goals and Action Items In response to the contributing factors identified above, HUD requires that the City establishes one or more goals for each identified fair housing issue and contributing factor. These strategies, once accepted by HUD, must then be incorporated into subsequent planning documents, such as the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans. In completing this Assessment of Fair Housing, the City has identified a number of actions that can be taken over the next five years that will promote fair housing. The City has taken a proactive stance on affirmatively furthering fair housing, and many action items have already been implemented. In addition, several action items and goals were previously identified in the updated Housing Element, Annual Operating Budgets, Capital Improvement Program Budgets, or other City Council adopted planning documents. These goals and action items are summarized below. Goal 1: Increase the affordable the Item 1-1: Enter into an agreement with potential developers to allocate $12.4 million in Tax Allocation bond proceeds to construct additional affordable housing. Action Item 1-2: Adopt an Affordable Housing Overlay ordinance that would identify sites where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing and establish a density bonus program. Goal 2: Partner with local organizations for - provision of services address homelessness. Expl - - Explore and evaluate a partnership with the Riverside County Continuum of Care for the provision of services for the homeless in southwestern Riverside County. Continue to participate in the Regional Homeless Alliance in jointly addressing regional homeless needs. Continue to work with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department on the provision of services to the homeless. Continue to encourage and support local nonprofit groups that address the housing needs of homeless and other disadvantaged groups. Continue to permit emergency shelters in areas permitted by the Municipal Code Continue to support and promote the Mortgage Credit Certificate program and the California Housin Finance Agency CaIHFA . Evaluate the formation of a partnership with the County of Riverside to receive HOME funds for a first-time homebuyer or housing rehabilitation program. . . Increase accessibility to . facilities. Adopt an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan to evaluate public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. Continue to increase public awareness and educate representatives of the housing industry on ADA requirements by holding workshops. Continue to upgrade the City's infrastructure to make them more accessible for those with disabilities. Continue to provide support for fair housing training and education by including information on the City's website and the distribution of materials at City facilities. . . 5 Supportthe Fair Housing Council on education on fair housing laws. Continue to support application for federal funds by local fair housing organizations. Continue to provide support for fair housing training and education by including information on the City's website and the distribution of materials at City facilities. a" 0 Preserve affordable rental housing. Im Continue to support the County of Riverside in administering the Section 8 program. Continue to use, when feasible, City-owned and City-controlled land for affordable housing projects. Continue to promote the preservation of affordable housing projects at risk of converting to market-rate housing. Goal 7: Increase housing choices for those with special needs and Continue to encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as seniors and persons with disabilities. a" a Increase access and usage of public transportation. Continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation options as development occurs Continue to partner with the Riverside Transit Agency and fund select transportation routes throughout the City. Continue to collaborate with regional partners on the analysis of a regional transportation center in Temecula. Construct a Park-and-Ride facility on Temecula Parkway to encourage alternative transportation and the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. Continue to require developers to construct multi-use trails in conjunction with the 2016 Multi- Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update. Continue to participate in the Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition, a partnership aimed at r ducing the consumption of petroleum fuels. Continue to pursue AB 2766 resources, a funding source aimed at improving air quality, to fund signal timing, sidewalks and bike lane projects. Public Outreach In order to further address community needs, HUD has implemented additional public outreach requirements into the AFH process. On June 28, 2016, the City Council adopted an updated Citizen Participation Plan, setting forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, Assessment of Fair Housing, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds. The City planned a robust community outreach program in the development of the City's Assessment of Fair Housing. To reach a wide variety of community members, two surveys were distributed regarding housing and community needs, one directed at residents and the second toward the stakeholders. The resident survey was available on the City webpage, advertised in the San Diego Union Tribune, distributed at the front counter and permit center, and paper copies of the survey were given to focus groups including the Temecula Pantry, Regional Homeless Alliance, and churches whose congregation mostly serve minority populations. The City received a total of 91 completed surveys. Over 150 stakeholders were notified by email of the City's AFH preparation process. A concerted effort was made to reach out to organizations that represented persons with disabilities, both through the community meetings and during the consultation stage of the citizen participation process. MDG consulted with and received feedback from 18 non-profit and religious organizations throughout the community. As required by HUD, the City conducted two public hearings during the AFH process, one on June 28, 2016, and a second on September 27, 2016, to obtain the views of the community on affirmatively furthering fair housing in the jurisdiction's housing and community development programs. Staff and MDG Associates also conducted three community workshops. The first two community meetings were held on June 29, 2016, at 4:00 and 6:00 pm. A third community meeting was conducted on Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 10:00 am. The community meetings were interactive workshops with questions and answers on needs of the City including fair housing, community facilities and infrastructure, affordable housing and economic development. The draft assessment of Fair Housing was available for public review between August 27, 2016 and September 27, 2016. Copies of the draft AFH were available for review at City Hall, the Ronald H. Roberts Public Library, and the City's website. Next Steps The Assessment of Fair Housing is due to HUD on October 4, 2016 or no later than 270 days prior to the implementation of the 2017 — 2021 Consolidated Plan. A HUD-accepted AFH is a pre-requisite to the approval of an entitlement jurisdiction Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan is due to HUD May 17, 2017 and becomes effective July 1, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: A HUD approved Assessment of Fair Housing is required in order to continue to receive Community Development Block Grant funding. The City will receive $515,688 in CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 2016-17. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Assessment of Fair Housing 2. Resolution 3. Notice of Public Hearing (English and Spanish) City of Temecula Draft Assessment of Fair Housing Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 September 2016 C7 T7rt ofCdl(ornle T Wine Country Yr y I n This page intentionally left blank. Cover Sheet 1. Submission date: October 4, 2016 2. Submitter name: City of Temecula 3. Type of submission(e.g.,single program participant,joint submission): Single program participant 4. Type of program participant(s) (e.g.,consolidated plan participant,PHA): Consolidated Plan 5. For PHAs,Jurisdiction in which the program participant is located: N/A 6. Submitter members(if applicable): N/A 7. Sole or lead submitter contact information: a. Name: Lynn Kelly-Lehner b. Title: Principal Management Analyst c. Department: Community Development Department d. Street address: 41000 Main Street e. City: Temecula f. State: CA g. Zip code: 92590 8. Period covered by this assessment: July 1, 2017 -June 30, 2022 9. Initial,amended,or renewal AFH: Initial 10. To the best of its knowledge and belief,the statements and information contained herein are true, accurate, and complete and the program participant has developed this AFH in compliance with the requirements of 24 C.F.R. §§ 5.150-5.180 or comparable replacement regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development; 11. The program participant will take meaningful actions to further the goals identified in its AFH conducted in accordance with the requirements in§§ 5.150 through 5.180 and 24 C.F.R. §§ 91.225(a)(1),91.325(a)(1),91.425(a)(1), 570.487(b)(1), 570.601,903.7(0), and 903.15(d), as applicable. All Joint and Regional Participants are bound by the certification, except that some of the analysis, goals or priorities included in the AFH may only apply to an individual program participant as expressly stated in the AFH. ------------------------------------------------- Aaron Adams Date City Manager 12. Departmental acceptance or non-acceptance: U.S Department of Housing & Urban Development/Date This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary............................................................................................................................... I II. Community Participation Process..........................................................................................................4 IIl. Assessment of Past Goals and Actions..................................................................................................9 IV. Fair Housing Analysis......................................................................................................................... 13 A. Demographic Summary B. General Issues i. Segregation/Integration ii. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty(R/ECAPs) iii. Disparities in Access to Opportunity iv. Disproportionate Housing Needs C. Publicly Supported Housing Analysis D. Disability and Access Analysis E. Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis V. Fair Housing Goals and Priorities........................................................................................................37 Appendices A. HUD-Provided Maps B. HUD-Provided Tables C. City of Temecula Assessment of Fair Housing Resident Surveys (English/Spanish) D. City of Temecula Assessment of Fair Housing Stakeholder Survey E. Stakeholder Consultation List F. General Plan Land Use Map G. CDBG-Eligible Area Map H. Public Transportation Maps (Employers,Public Facilities, Publicly Assisted Housing) I. List of Public Services funded with CDBG and General Fund J. List of Units Funded with Redevelopment Agency Funds i K. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data L. Fair Housing Council of Riverside County Fair Housing Initiatives Program Testing Results (2010-2015) M. Survey Results N. Eagle Soar O. Public Hearing Notices P. Summary of Public Comments at Public Hearings and Community Meetings ii I. Executive Summary 1. Summarize the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and goals. Also include an overview of the process and analysis used to reach the goals. The City of Temecula is located in the extreme southwest corner of the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which is the largest MSA in area in the continental United States. Temecula is 45 miles from Riverside, the County Seat, and nearly 70 miles from the City of San Bernardino, the County Seat of San Bernardino County. At 60 miles away, Temecula is closer to the City of San Diego than to San Bernardino. It is 172 miles from Blythe in Riverside County and 240 miles from Needles in San Bernardino County. Because of its location in the corner of the region, one must be cautious to draw too many conclusions in comparing Temecula to the regional data supplied by HUD. This Assessment compares and contrasts the City with the regional data,but as one would expect,there are some substantial differences in the data profiles and the needs between the City and the region. Many of these differences are evident in the HUD-supplied maps and charts included in Appendix A and Appendix B,respectively. The City is located in a cluster of cities in Temecula Valley in southwest Riverside County. The other cities include Murrieta,Menifee, Wildomar and Lake Elsinore. All have experienced tremendous growth in the past twenty years, yet they remain separate and some distant from the metropolitan areas to the north and south. Through its growth, Temecula has remained an integrated and diverse City with racial and ethnic groups spread evenly throughout the City. There are no HUD-identified racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) in the City. During the housing crisis of 2007-2008, the City was hit with many foreclosures and that was the greatest concern in the previous Analysis of Impediments completed in 2010. Now with the housing industry recovery, the greatest need in the City is affordable housing and many new homebuyers are priced out of the market. Like all cities in the State of California, Temecula is challenged by a lack of resources to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State's redevelopment agencies. This had been the source of hundreds of affordable housing units constructed in the City since the 1990s. Fair housing issues in Temecula appear to be individualized and not systemic, but preventing systematic issues requires continuous training and education of those persons employed in the housing industry, as well as educating the residents of their fair housing rights. In completing this Assessment of Fair Housing,the City has identified a number of actions that can be taken over the next five years that will promote fair housing for its residents. These action items will be discussed at the end of this report, but a summary of these actions items is provided below. • Adopt an Affordable Housing Overlay ordinance that would identify sites throughout the City where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing and establish a density bonus program. • Enter into an agreement with potential developers to allocate $12.4 million in Tax Allocation bond proceeds to construct additional affordable housing. 1 • Explore and evaluate a partnership with the Riverside County Continuum of Care for the provision of services for the homeless in southwestern Riverside County. • Continue to participate in the Regional Homeless Alliance in jointly addressing regional homeless needs. • Continue to work with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department on the provision of services to the homeless. • Continue to encourage and support local nonprofit groups that address the housing needs of homeless and other disadvantaged groups. • Continue to permit emergency shelters in areas permitted by the City of Temecula Municipal Code • Continue to support and promote the Mortgage Credit Certificate program and the state of California Housing Finance Agency(Ca1HFA). • Evaluate the formation of a partnership with the County of Riverside to receive HOME funds for a first-time homebuyer or housing rehabilitation program. • Adopt an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan to evaluate public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. • Continue to increase public awareness and educate representatives of the housing industry on ADA requirements by holding workshops. • Continue to upgrade the City's infrastructure to make them more accessible for those with disabilities. • Continue to provide support for fair housing training and education by including information on the City's website and the distribution of materials at City facilities. • Continue to support application for federal fund by local fair housing organizations. • Continue to promote the preservation of affordable housing projects at risk of converting to market-rate housing. • Continue to support the County of Riverside in administering the Section 8 program. • Continue to use, when feasible, City-owned and City-controlled land for affordable housing projects. • Continue to encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as seniors and persons with disabilities. • Continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation options as development occurs 2 • Continue to partner with the Riverside Transit Agency and fund select transportation routes throughout the City. • Continue to collaborate with regional partners on the analysis of a regional transportation center in Temecula. • Construct a Park-and-Ride facility on Temecula Parkway to encourage alternative transportation and the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. • Continue to require developers to construct multi-use trails in conjunction with the 2016 Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update. • Continue to participate in the Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition, a partnership aimed at reducing the consumption of petroleum fuels. • Continue to pursue AB 2766 resources, a funding source aimed at improving air quality, to fund signal timing, sidewalks and bike lane projects. 3 II. Community Participation Process 1. Describe outreach activities undertaken to encourage and broaden meaningful community participation in the AFH process, including the types of outreach activities and dates of public hearings or meetings. Identify media outlets used and include a description of efforts made to reach the public, including those representing populations that are typically underrepresented in the planning process such as persons who reside in areas identified as R/ECAPs, persons who are limited English proficient (LEP), and persons with disabilities. Briefly explain how these communications were designed to reach the broadest audience possible. For PHAs, identify your meetings with the Resident Advisory Board. The City planned a robust community outreach program in the development of the City's Assessment of Fair Housing(AFH). To reach the largest number of people and a wide variety of interests,the City conducted two surveys, one directed primarily at residents and the second toward the stakeholders. The City believed that a separate stakeholder survey was necessary, because many of the stakeholders did not reside in the City and many of the housing quality questions in the resident survey might not be relevant. At the same time, the City sought more in-depth responses from the stakeholders about the needs of the community and as well as to obtain data supporting their responses. The resident survey was available on the City webpage and advertised in the San Diego Union Tribune newspaper, a media of general circulation in Temecula. The City engaged with City staff that interacts with the public, including Senior Center staff and the Public Works, Community Development, City Manager's office and Community Services departments. The survey was also distributed at the front counter and permit center at City Hall. To further reach the public,paper copies of the survey were given to various focus groups including: • Temecula Pantry • Regional Homeless Alliance • Churches whose congregation mostly served minority populations In the process, the City doubled the number of stakeholders from its previous consolidated planning process as part of its outreach efforts to ensure a broader citizen participation process to fully assess the City's fair housing issues and community development needs. In many cases, the City followed up with individual phone calls to achieve clarification and a greater understanding of needs that they identified. The City notified over 150 stakeholders by email of the City's Assessment of Fair Housing preparation process and solicited their insight and input. On June 20, 2016, stakeholders were asked to complete a fair housing and community development needs assessment survey. A copy of the surveys completed by residents is included in this report as Appendix C in English and Spanish, with a copy of the survey completed by stakeholders included in Appendix D and a full list of stakeholders consulted in Appendix E. The City conducted two public hearings. A public hearing before the City Council was convened on June 28, 2016 to obtain the views of the community on affirmatively furthering fair housing in the jurisdiction's housing and community development programs prior to drafting this AFH. No public comments were received during this hearing. (A second public 4 hearing before the City Council was convened September 27, 2016 to obtain comments on the draft Assessment of Fair Housing.} The City conducted three community workshops. The first two community meetings were held on June 29, 2016. The first was conducted at 4:00 p.m. to accommodate those who preferred to come during working hours, followed by another after hours at 6:00 p.m. for those who could not attend during the day A third community meeting was conducted on Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. The community meetings were interactive workshops with questions and answers on various needs of the City including: fair housing, community facilities and infrastructure, affordable housing and economic development. A concerted effort was made to reach out to organizations that represented persons with disabilities, both through the community meetings and during the City's consultation stage of its citizen participation process. During the outreach, the City talked with pastors of three ethnocentric churches and provided surveys to them for their members. The City does not have any Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty(R/ECAPs). 2. Provide a list of organizations consulted during the community participation process. The City expanded its mailing list of stakeholders to over 150 persons and agencies. (See Appendix E for a list of the persons contacted.) 3. How successful were the efforts at eliciting meaningful community participation? If there was low participation,provide the reasons. A public hearing before the City Council was convened on June 28, 2016 to obtain the views of the community on AFH-related data and affirmatively furthering fair housing in the jurisdiction's housing and community development programs. No public comments were received during this hearing. {A second public hearing before the City Council was convened September 27, 2016 to obtain comments on the draft Assessment of Fair Housing. Comments from the September 27,2016 hearing will be inserted upon completion of the hearing.} A total of 91 persons responded to our surveys, 45 responses from residents and 46 responses from stakeholders. While the response rate was lower than expected, the City received valuable feedback from the surveys received. Another recent City-sponsored survey for local municipal issues was undertaken separately, and just prior to the launch of the Assessment of Fair Housing Survey. In response to outreach and marketing efforts for the resident survey, a number of residents indicated to staff that they had already taken the survey when in fact they did not realize the Assessment of Fair Housing survey was a separate survey on different topics. The State Council on Developmental Disabilities also conducted a workshop during this same period. Despite significant promotional efforts,they also faced low response issues. The City conducted a random telephone survey for a Community Opinion Study in 2014 and was able to secure the participation of 400 respondents. This survey found that 96 percent of 5 Temecula residents felt that they had a good or excellent quality of life in the City. Less than one percent had a poor opinion of the City. There was no difference between the responses from renters and homeowners. The greatest response was that they liked the small town feeling and community involvement of its residents. Traffic congestion was cited as the greatest problem. Over 90 percent of respondents were satisfied with City services, facilities and programs. Only four percent said that the Temecula schools were poor. When compared to a similar study in 2000, there was no significant difference in opinion of the respondents, despite the fact that the City had grown substantially during that period. At the June 29, 2016 community meetings, eight residents and stakeholders participated in a discussion of fair housing issues and community needs. The attendance at these meetings was lower than expected due to local traffic challenges associated with a Cal-Trans freeway closure at Rancho California Boulevard and the I-15 near City Hall. At the July 30, 2016 community meeting, five residents and stakeholders participated in the discussion. For future planning efforts,the City wishes to improve stakeholder and resident feedback. The next AFH will be due 195 days prior to the start of the program year instead of 270 days prior to the start of the program year. This will allow the City to schedule its community participation process to coincide with a time of the year when many residents and stakeholders are not on summer vacations. 4. Summarize all comments obtained in the community participation process. Include a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why. On June 3, 2016, the City consultant met with the pastors of Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula and they agreed to work with the City in obtaining input from their 300 member Spanish-speaking congregation. In talking with the pastor, they considered traffic congestion to the greatest problem that the City currently has. To reach the African American and Filipino communities, the City consultant contacted Nu-Way International Christian Ministries, which serves a mostly Black congregation and the Love of Christ Fellowship, which serves a mostly Filipino congregation. The City also connected with Rancho Community Church and St. Catherine Catholic Church which have ministries to minority groups. June 29, 2016: At the two community meetings on June 29, 2016, participants had the following comments. There was a discussion for the need of accessible sidewalks and the group was excited about the improvements being made with CDBG funds to Old Town. According to the participants, there is a need for another senior center and felt that an intergenerational facility would be important to the residents. This could address the great need for more programs for the teens. Participants pointed out that since most of the Pujol neighborhood needs have been met, the area of greatest need for community facilities and programs is the Margarita corridor, where the Margarita Park Eagle Soar, a new community facility was recently completed to serve the area. There was considerable discussion about the need for support services for families with special needs children. Currently, many of those services are only available in Riverside, which is forty minutes away. They believed that the homelessness need is great in the City. Affordable housing is the greatest need in the City with home prices climbing again. With the demand for housing, it is hard for those who cannot provide all cash in a purchase. This is especially important issue for the increasing senior population who will need care facilities in the future. Job training for local employers is needed. 6 There is an issue with the school district not having the resources to fully fund special education programs. There was a discussion about historic preservation with respect to the Vail Ranch project. The City should look at whether there are any ADA issues at private facilities that could be addressed with CDBG funds. There is a high demand for first time home buyer assistance, especially for off-base military personnel and veterans. A complete summary of the comments is provided in Appendix P. July 30, 2016: At the community meeting on July 30, 2016, the participants had the following comments. They noted that the City has made great strides in addressing the needs of the Pujol community. There is still a need to include an additional bridge on Via Montezuma over the creek from Jefferson to Diaz Road to provide greater access to that side of the community. There was talk about the need for additional centers for teens. There was a discussion about the increased demand for mental health facilities especially for the young people. The expansion of programs for the special needs community seemed to be a recurring theme at the community meetings for the City. There was a discussion for the increased in demand for services for homeless persons and for an additional homeless shelter in the region, and it was suggested that the City consider a zoning change to allow for "tiny houses" for the homeless. Affordable housing is a major problem in the City, so much so that many of the local workforce is priced out of the market. This is exasperated by the fact that the FHA mortgage limits are artificially too low to assist many new homebuyers in Temecula's housing market. Participants in the meeting indicated that any racial/ethnic segregation was likely more of a function of minorities, and particularly immigrants, choosing to locate near family and friends for support. With housing prices increasing beyond many families' income, there are increased instances of multi-generational households. To address this issue, there is now a private housing project that provides a large number of bedrooms to house multi-generational families. This is believed to especially benefit immigrant families with their assimilation process, who are accustomed to this familial situation. There was discussion about the Temecula Elementary School neighborhood. It is the only Title 1 School in the City and participants thought that the area may be experiencing some problems. A complete summary of the comments is provided in Appendix P. Survey Results: Two surveys were conducted with two purposes in mind. The first was to address fair housing issues and the second was to initiate the five-year consolidated planning process. Some of the consolidated planning process applied to the fair housing assessment and the results are summarized below. (See Appendix M for a summary of the survey results and comments.) While the survey responses were less than anticipated,the results reflected a good cross section of the community. Respondents included residents, various public services sectors, homeless providers, youth and senior services, agencies serving the disabled, AIDS groups,health care, mental health, service providers for the developmentally disabled, real estate and banking industries, affordable 7 housing industry, apartment association, law enforcement, regional government and City officials. The survey revealed that if there is discrimination occurring in the community, most people, whether residents or stakeholders,are unaware that it is occurring. Consultations: In conducting this assessment, the City consulted with a number of stakeholders including meetings on June 3, 2016 with various church groups; June 29, 2016 with Habitat for Humanity;August 3, 2016 with the Southwest Riverside Association of Realtors and Temecula Valley Unified School District; August 5, 2016 with the State Council on Developmental Disabilities and the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County; August 11, 2016 with the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance, Riverside County Continuum of Care, Wells Fargo Bank, and Inland Regional Center; and on August 12, 2016 with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department and on August 15, 2016 with the Riverside County Economic Development Agency and Housing Authority of Riverside County. 8 III. Assessment of Past Goals,Actions and Stratep-ies 1. Indicate what fair housing goals were selected by program participant(s) in recent Analyses of Impediments, Assessments of Fair Housing, or other relevant planning documents: a. Discuss what progress has been made toward their achievement: The Analysis of Impediments identified the following impediments and observations: Observation No 1 — Lack of affordable housing could become a future barrier to housing choice. • Action Item No. 1-1 Continue to diversify housing stock. The City should make a concerted effort to increase the number of affordable rentals located east of 1-15. Progress Made: The City continues to support the development affordable housing. The City issued a request for proposal(s) out for the remaining Tax Allocation Bond proceeds ($12.4 million), which could include more than one site, some of which are located east of 1-15. The request for proposals closed in May 2016. The City received twenty proposals from interested developers. The proposals are currently being reviewed by City staff. • Action Item No. 1-2. Address the basic needs of low income households. The City should also use CDBG and other HUD funds it may receive to preserving the safety net for its lowest income households who have difficulty finding affordable rentals and are likely cost burdened and/or at risk of homelessness. This could include supporting homeless shelters, food pantries, emergency assistance programs and social services operations. Progress Made: Since the adoption of the City's previous Analysis of Impediments, the City has focused its CDBG public services funds on addressing its homeless needs as well as those at-risk of becoming homeless by providing assistance to the Inclement Weather Shelter Program, clothing for low income school children, domestic violence services, child care services and assistance to three organizations that provide food services to the homeless and those at risk of homelessness. The City also provides discretionary General Fund moneys to a number of organizations, which are listed in Appendix I. The City also participates in the Continuum of Care as well as a Southwest Riverside County Regional Homeless Alliance that includes four cities in the region. In addition, the City is providing a home repair and maintenance grant program to low income households administered by Habitat for Humanity. The City has also funded a solar energy installation program for low income homeowners through GRID. The City amended its ordinances to efficiency units housing structures in 2013. The City now allows the use of Section 8 vouchers for those with second units on their property. 9 The City supported retaining the affordability of the Rancho California apartments at the TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) hearing which were at- risk of being converted to market rate rents. Observation No.2—Steering may be a fair housing impediment. • Action Item 2. Conduct fair housing outreach and education with Temecula's real estate professionals. Progress Made: The City has annually provided CDBG funding to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County for fair housing education, training and enforcement program for low income households. The City also provides fair housing information on its City website and includes referrals to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County for residents and nonprofits. Impediment No.3—Zoning regulations could be improved to facilitate affordable housing development. • Action Item 3. The City should clarify the definition of family so that it does not exclude unrelated parties living in group home settings and add congregate care and residential care facilities with seven or more occupants to some residential zones. Progress Made: On April 23, 2013, the City adopted Ordinance 13-03 which defined certain housing-related terms, designated zoning districts for residential care facilities, transitional, supportive and efficiency unit housing and established development standards for efficiency unit housing. Included in that ordinance was a change in the definition of family. The City is intending to bring to the City Council an ordinance in 2017 that would establish a Housing Affordability Overlay that will identify sites throughout the City where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing and establish a density bonus program. This will assist the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) targets established by the Southern California Association of Governments. Staff is continuing to encourage opportunities for senior and affordable housing projects throughout the City. In the update of the City's Housing Element, the City committed to taking the following actions to address fair housing: o Provide incentives for affordable housing development o Increase housing options through better definition of both transitional and supportive housing o Provide homebuyer assistance o Subdivide larger sites for development of housing for low-income households. 10 Like all cities in California, the dissolution of the redevelopment agencies has had a major adverse impact in the ability of the City to aggressively accomplish some of its affordable housing goals. As a result, the City's homebuyer program has been put on hold as well as its land assemblage programs. The City has $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. The City recently issued a request for proposals (RFP) seeking innovative projects that address one or more of the following housing needs: special needs, veterans, seniors, housing first, transitional and supportive housing. Reductions in HUD funding for housing has further limited the City to address these needs. Observation No.4—High loan denials in low income area. • Action Item No. 4. Invest in low income neighborhoods.The City should invest in community projects in its low income areas. Such investments will mitigate neighborhood deterioration, which is particularly important given the high rates of loan denials in the areas east of I-15. In addition, public improvements in low- income areas ensure that the amenities offered in these areas are comparable to amenities in higher income areas. Inequality of neighborhood amenities can become a fair housing concern if lower quality neighborhoods predominantly occupied by members of protected classes. Progress Made: The City has focused its CDBG capital funding in CDBG eligible census tracts, including the Pujol neighborhood and Old Town. The City has upgraded Temecula Community Center and parks and is providing sidewalk improvements in those areas. Mixed-income housing developments are transforming this area into a vibrant place to live and work, while maintaining its diversity. Five years ago, the City was coping with a high foreclosure rate as a result of the housing bust of 2007-2008. It was estimated that nearly 15% of the housing stock was bank-owned or in some state of foreclosure. According to Property Radar, there were only 97 bank-owned properties (REO inventory) in the City in May 2016.This was a drop of 22.4%in the past year. Since 2007-2008, housing prices have rebounded and fewer homeowners are under water with their mortgages. According to the Southwest Riverside County Realtor Report published in 2016, the median home price is $436,577 with the average home sale exceeding $500,000 for the first time since December 2007. This indicates that median home prices have increased by 5% in the last 12 months. Compared to 2007 sales price levels, the City is now less than 10% of what it was at its highest levels. While this is good for the homeowner, it can be difficult for the first-time homebuyers to afford homes in Temecula. Nonetheless, home sales have increased by 18%for both April and May of 2016 over 2015 levels. The City evaluated home loans for both mortgages and refinancing. The data revealed that none of the racial or ethnic groups experienced disproportionately lower approval rates, compared to other groups in the City. (See Appendix K for Home Mortgage Disclosure Act(NMDA) data charts.) 11 Observation No.5—There is a lack of information and knowledge about fair housing. • Action Item No. 5. Improve access to fair housing information. The City of Temecula should add easy to find fair housing information on its website. It is critical that the City have a link to HUD's complaint-taking website and the State of California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), where residents may file complaints if they so desire. Progress Made: The City has added information on its website directing residents with fair housing questions to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County website that contains resource links to HUD, DFEH and other legal and regulatory agencies. The City site also provides an explanation of the services provided by the Fair Housing Council. b. Discuss how you have been successful in achieving past goals, and/or how you have fallen short of achieving those goals (including potentially harmful unintended consequences);and As described above, the City has been very successful in achieving its goals. They are reflected in its commitment to address the needs that were identified as well as by the results of the survey. The greatest deterrent in meeting the needs for affordable housing has been the dissolution of the redevelopment agencies by the State of California. This had been the greatest source of funding for cities such as Temecula in addressing its affordable housing needs. c. Discuss any additional policies, actions, or steps that you could take to achieve past goals,or mitigate the problems you have experienced. Without the use of redevelopment funds, the City will be highly dependent upon the limited funds available through the Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) and HUD funded programs. The City will continue to pursue affordable housing grant program opportunities and partnerships with nonprofits, county,regional, and State agencies. As mentioned earlier in this Assessment, the City is intending to bring to the City Council an ordinance in 2017 that would establish a Housing Affordability Overlay that will identify sites throughout the City where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing and establish a density bonus program. This will assist the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)targets established by the Southern California Association of Governments. Also previously mentioned, the City issued a request for proposal(s) out for the remaining Tax Allocation Bond proceeds ($12.4 million), which could include more than one site, some of which are located east of 1-15. The request for proposals closed in May 2016. The City received twenty proposals from interested developers. The proposals are currently being reviewed by City staff. d. Discuss how the experience of program participant(s) with past goals has influenced the selection of current goals. Until the dissolution of the redevelopment agencies, the City had an aggressive and effective program in addressing its affordable housing needs. Through the redevelopment 12 program, the City assisted eleven rental projects that provided 588 units for low and moderate income families and individuals. In addition, it provided for 18 owner-occupied housing units. (See Appendix J for a list of the redevelopment projects completed by the City prior to the dissolution of the redevelopment agency.) Current goals are being established as part of this planning process with the understanding that housing and community development resources are scarcer and the development of affordable housing is more challenging. 13 IV. Fair Housing Analysis A. Demographic Summary 1. Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region, and describe trends over time(since 1990). In comparing Map 1-Race and Ethnicity 2010 with Map 2-Race and Ethnicity Trends 1990, the City of Temecula has grown substantially in population. Through this period of tremendous growth, the City remains a diverse and integrated community, and there are no significant concentrations of segregation. Table 2-Demographic Trends describes the growth rates during the twenty year period from 1990 to 2010 and provides trends for race/ethnicity, national origin, limited English proficiency, sex, age and families with children. While all racial and ethnic groups, except Native Americans, have increased numerically, Hispanics and Asians have far exceeded the proportionate growth of other racial and ethnic groups. Whites are continuing to increase, but at a slower rate. This is also true for the region as a whole. This trend is also reflected in the percentage of persons from other nations. However, the proportion of those with limited English proficiency has not increased as dramatically as the ethnic populations have, both within the City and in the region as whole. The number families with children in proportion to the general population (and correspondingly those under the age of 18) increased over the twenty year period,but decreased in the last ten years for both the City and region. 2. Describe the location of homeowners and renters in the jurisdiction and region, and describe trends over time. Multi-family areas are located throughout the City particularly along major arterials, in the downtown area and west side of the town. Undeveloped land in the north and south is projected on the General Plan for higher density residential. (See Appendix F for a map of the land use element of the City's adopted General Plan.) B. General Issues i. Se2re2ation/Integration 1. Analysis a. Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region. Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation. According to the HUD provided Map 1-Race and Ethnicity, Temecula had no areas of concentrations of racial or ethnic groups. All ethnic groups are spread evenly throughout the City. The City also had no HUD-defined racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAP areas). Local knowledge confirmed this observation. Map 2 shows no appreciable difference from 1990. This is also confirmed with Table 3-Racial and Ethnicity Dissimilarity Trends. According to HUD, if a jurisdiction has an Index value of less than 40, there is 14 high diversity (low segregation) in the City. The City has a score between 18.93 and 26.05 for the various racial and ethnic groups. Likewise, Map 3-National Origin shows no segregation pattern based on national origin. The top five population groups are spread evenly throughout the City, showing the City's diversity and high integration. In comparing the City with the region from Table 2-Demographic Trends, the percentage of Blacks and Hispanics is about half that in the region. There are more Whites and Asians in Temecula than the regional average. Twenty-two percent of the City's Hispanics were born in Mexico compared to 27% for the region based on calculation of figures in Table 1. Eighty-nine percent of the Hispanic immigrants are Limited English Proficiency (LEP). This is roughly the same as for the region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of foreign born over the past twenty years, but the percentage of Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons remained about the same, even though their population increased. Although only 3% of the population, 40% of Filipinos are LEPs, compared to 27% region-wide. According to Map 4-Persons with LEP,their populations are spread evenly across the City. According to Table 1, the largest disabled population are those who are ambulatory (3.83%), followed by those with cognitive difficulty (3.54%), independent living difficulty (2.90%) and those with hearing loss (2.67%). There is probably considerable overlap in these populations. According to Table 1, eight percent of the City's population is seniors compared to 10.4% region-wide. Fifty-six percent of the households are families with children compared to 51% region-wide. While all age groups increased in population, there was a slight decrease in the percentage of children and an increase in those of middle age. That could further be seen in a decrease in the proportion of families with children, even though it remains higher than the regional percentages. b. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time (since 1990). According to Table 2-Demographic Trends, racial and ethnic diversity has increased dramatically in the City over the past twenty years. Except Native Americans,the population of all racial and ethnic groups has grown;however, the Hispanic and Asian populations have increased at a much faster rate than the other population groups. Hispanics have increased from 14.5% to 25% of the population and Asians / Pacific Islanders from 2.40% to 9.71%. Despite an increase in population of over 28,000 in twenty years, the proportion of Whites has decreased from 80.23% in 1990 to 57% in 2010. Blacks have increased at a less dramatic rate from 1.3% to 4% from 1990 to 2010, but showed a slight decline percentagewise from 4.16% in 2000 to 3.88% in 2010, even though their population increased. While Native Americans constitute only .6% of the population, they were the only ethnic group to show a decrease in population between 2000 and 2010. 15 Through the tremendous growth in populations, Table 3 demonstrates that the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index range was still between 18.93 and 26.05, well below the HUD threshold of 40, meaning there is minimal segregation and high integration within the City. This compares to a range between 41.29 and 47.66 for the region. c. Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area. According to Maps 1 through 4 pertaining to racial and ethnic data and dissimilarity indexes, there are no patterns of segregation by race and ethnicity, national origin or LEP groups in the City. d. Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or integrated areas. Based on the above discussion, there are no patterns of segregation in the City by race, ethnicity, national origin or LEP. The majority of multi-family residential is located in areas with easy access to transit systems and employment centers throughout the City. e. Discuss how patterns of segregation have changed over time(since 1990). There has been little change in segregation patterns over the last twenty years even though the City has grown dramatically during that period. The City has no patterns of segregation. f. Discuss whether there are any demographic trends,policies,or practices that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future. Based upon data in Table 2, the trend is that the City is becoming increasingly diverse as it has grown over the last twenty years. This is in line with trends throughout the region. Maps 1 and 2 do not reveal trends of segregation patterns forming within the City as a result of the growth. 2. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about segregation in the jurisdiction and region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. Information gathered from community meetings and surveys along with data sources provided stakeholders did not provide any information that segregation exists in the City affecting other protected characteristics was provided through stakeholder consultations. Workshop participants also concluded that the City is highly diverse. 16 The region does have higher scores than the City, indicating a very diverse and integrated population, but as mentioned in the introduction, the region represents the largest MSA in the nation. b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of segregation, including activities such as place-based investments and mobility options for protected class groups. CDBG funds have been focused on the needs of the City's CDBG eligible census tracts. Public services and housing programs have been focused on the CDBG eligible areas of the City. (See Appendix F for the location of the CDBG eligible areas.) 3. Contributing Factors of Segregation Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of segregation. ❑ Community Opposition ❑ Displacement of residents due to economic pressures ❑ Lack of community revitalization strategies ❑ Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods ❑ Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities ❑ Lack of regional cooperation ❑ Land use and zoning laws ❑ Lending Discrimination ❑ Location and type of affordable housing ❑ Occupancy codes and restrictions ❑ Private discrimination Z Other:There are no patterns in the City. ii. R/ECAPs 1. Analysis a. Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of RECAP tracts within the jurisdiction. HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within the City. b. Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared to the jurisdiction and region? N/A c. Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time(since 1990). N/A 17 2. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about R/ECAPs in the jurisdiction and region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. N/A b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of R/ECAPs, including activities such as place-based investments and mobility options for protected class groups. N/A 3. Contributing Factors of R/ECAPs Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of RIECAPs. ❑ Community Opposition ❑ Displacement of residents due to economic pressures ❑ Lack of community revitalization strategies ❑ Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods ❑ Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities ❑ Lack of regional cooperation ❑ Land use and zoning laws ❑ Lending Discrimination ❑ Location and type of affordable housing ❑ Occupancy codes and restrictions ❑ Private discrimination Z Other: Not Applicable. HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within the City. iii. Disparities in Access to Opportunity 1. Analysis a. Educational Opportunities i. Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity,national origin,and family status. The City does not have jurisdiction over the local schools. They are administered by independent public school districts, such as the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Table 12 - Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity provides an index regarding how well fourth graders of the various racial and ethnic groups are 18 doing on their State exams in comparison with national indices. Higher scores indicate higher proficiencies in the schools. According to Table 12,the school proficiency index is essentially the same for all races and ethnic groups in the City. On a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest, Hispanics scored 79.00, Blacks at 80.36, Native Americans at 80.86, Asians at 81.58 and Whites at 82.20. In comparison, the region scored between 40.97 for Hispanics on the low end and 58.09 for Whites on the high end. The City has one Title 1 elementary school in the northern end of the City. A school is a Title 1 School if at least 40% of the children participate in a free or reduced lunch program. The school is located in one of the City's CDBG eligible areas. There are no Title 1 Middle Schools or High Schools in the City. The school district has a policy that parents can transfer their children from school to school subject to availability. Parents would responsible for providing transportation to the new school. Public transportation is available, although it may be limited based on the location of the school from their place of residence. ii. Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin,and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools. There is no difference in the school proficiency index Citywide between the higher income households and those populations below the poverty line; however, there is some difference in scores between some of the schools in the higher income areas and one school in a lower income areas in the northwest part of the City. This can be found on Map 9 Demographics and School Proficiency by Race/Ethnicity, National Origin and Family Status. The lower income area is predominately Whites along with some Mexican, Korean, and Filipino immigrants. This is the site of the City's only Title 1 School. Describe how school-related policies, such as school enrollment policies, affect a student's ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools? The City does not have jurisdiction over the public schools. However, all protected classes Citywide are performing at above regional levels as discussed above and there is virtually no difference between the various racial groups. The school district has a policy that parents can transfer their children from school to school subject to availability. Parents would be responsible for providing transportation to the new school. Public transportation is available, although it may be limited based on the location of the school from their place of residence. 19 b. Employment Opportunities i. Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups. The Jobs Proximity Index in Table 12-Opportunity Indicators provides an index for the physical distances between place of residence and jobs by race/ethnicity. The Labor Market Index also in Table 12 provides a measure of unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. The higher scores represent greater the access to employment opportunities, and are better preparation to enter the labor market with higher incomes. According to the Map 10 series for Job Proximities, persons in the lower- income areas live substantially closer to employment opportunities than their counterparts in the higher-income areas, often located farther away from the Interstate. Again, there was little difference between racial and ethnic groups or national origin according to Map 10 and Table 12 for Job Proximity. The Labor Market Index for the various races and ethnicities range from 46.38 for Native Americans to 49.79 for Whites. These scores, which are based on a scale from 1 to 100, would be in the average range based on HUD's perspective nationwide. There was no difference between the City as a whole and those below the poverty line. In fact, all races except Asians who were below the poverty line had slightly higher scores than those above the poverty level. They ranged between 44.15 for Asians and 51.31 for Blacks with Whites at 48.79. When compared with the region, the City residents scored much higher. The region ranged from 24.20 for Hispanics to 43.02 for Asians and unlike the City,there was a substantial difference for those below the poverty line. They ranged from 16.42 for Hispanics to 30.51 for Asians. Whites were at 25.55. Although some classes are available locally, the lack of a community college in Temecula in 2010 is probably part of the reason for this deficiency. However, since 2010, several campuses have opened in Temecula, including Cal State San Marcos at Temecula, University of Redlands, Concordia University, and Mount San Jacinto. More recent data would likely show an improvement in job readiness of the labor market. Other areas in the region have notably higher ratings such as in the vicinity of UC Riverside, Cal State San Bernardino and Redlands College in the north and in Orange County to the west. ii. How does a person's place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job? According to Map 11 Labor Market Engagement, those living in the high income areas have a greater labor-force participation rate than those who are living in the lower income areas. The Job Proximity Index on Table 12 demonstrates virtually no difference between racial and ethnic groups, ranging 20 from 43.37 for Asians on the low end to 44.36 for Hispanics on the upper end. There was a wider range for those below the poverty line. They ranged from 39.32 for Native Americans to 57.42 for Asians. Except for Native Americans, all their scores exceeded the counterparts who were above the poverty line. There was no substantial difference between the City and the region for these indices. iii. Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment? There was no appreciable difference between the various groups. c. Transportation Opportunities i. Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of residence,cost,or other transportation related factors. The Transportation Cost Index in Table 12 provides an index regarding the cost of transportation and proximity to public transportation. The score for this index was the only index where the City fared lower than the region. The low scores indicate that the City needs to improve access to public transportation, however low transportation costs are a challenge to the entire region, and are not just limited to City boundaries. According to Map 12-Demographics and Transit Trips and Map 13- Demographics and Low Transportation Costs, the lower-income areas had the highest scores, indicating that lower income residents have greater usage of public transportation than the higher income residents. This would be expected since the lower income persons are more dependent upon public transportation. The scores in Table 12 ranged from 18.10 for Native Americans and 19.98 for Whites to 25.05 for Hispanics. The scores for those below the poverty line have greater usage of public transportation as well, but higher than those who are above the poverty level. They ranged from 24.93 for Whites to 35.10 for Asians. The exception is that Native Americans had a low score at 15.77. The reason for that anomaly is unclear. There is one area in the north that has a low usage of public transportation. This is Census Tract 432.17. It is not an eligible CDBG area, because its median income is too high. It is also an area, as shown in Map 11, with a higher than average labor market engagement. This would indicate that there is not a great of a need for public transportation in that particular area. The scores for the region were low, from 25.75 to 32.68 for the region as a whole; and 29.20 to 37.05 for those populations below the poverty line; however, somewhat higher than for the City for racial and ethnic groups. ii. Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection between their place of residence and opportunities? 21 Except for Native Americans below the poverty line, there was no difference with the various protected class groups with access to low cost transportation. The reason for the anomaly is unclear. iii. Describe how the jurisdiction's and region's policies, such as public transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access transportation. Public transportation is provided by the Riverside Transit Agency and is not under the authority of the City. However, the City is served by several bus lines that provide service throughout the week and weekends. (See Appendix H for a map showing the service provided to the community.) The City will continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation options as development occurs. d. Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities i. Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups. The Low Poverty Index rates family poverty by household (based on the federal poverty line) provides an index regarding the access to poverty by census tract. The higher the scores, the less likely a neighborhood is exposed to poverty. There was little difference between the various ethnic and racial groups. Indices ranged from 65.42 for Hispanics to 71.23 for Whites, which indicates that all racial and ethnic groups have low exposure to poverty in Temecula. Except for Asians, there was little difference between those below the poverty line. They ranged for 54.98 for Blacks to 67.95 for Native Americans. The only anomaly was for Asians at 46.21 who were more exposed to poverty than their counterparts. This could be reflective of recent Filipino immigrants which now constitute over 3% of the City's population and 40% are limited English speaking according to Table 1. Though a small minority group, there are a number living in a low income area. Again, there was a substantial difference between the City residents and those within the region. In the region,the range was between 37.51 for Hispanics to 60.42 for Asians. For those below the poverty line, there was even a larger difference. They ranged from 23.78 for Hispanics to 42.30 for Asians. City residents have less exposure to poverty than the region as a whole. ii. What role does a person's place of residence play in their exposure to poverty? According to Map 14-Demographics and Poverty, there were four adjoining census tracts in north Temecula that had low scores indicating a higher exposure to poverty. Three of the census tracts are CDBG eligible lower- income areas,but one of the adjoining areas is not, yet affected by its exposure to poverty. Another adjoining area is an eligible CDBG area but did not 22 indicate a high exposure to poverty. The area has a number of market-rate and subsidized apartment complexes in the vicinity of the Temecula Elementary School, which may be affecting this index score. The corridor also contains many of the City's commercial shopping centers. iii. Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by these poverty indicators? There is not a substantial difference among the groups, except for Asians below the poverty line. This group may include recent immigrants from the Philippines, some of which have limited English proficiency. iv. Describe how the jurisdiction's and region's policies affect the ability of protected class groups to access low poverty areas. The City has adopted land use policies concentrating multi-family housing projects along major arterials, shopping, employment centers, and recreational facilities. This allows lower income persons easier access to opportunities; but at the same time, concentration of multi-family housing may statistically increase residents' exposure to poverty. The Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) represents six counties in the southern California area, which includes Temecula and Riverside County. In an effort to meet the affordable housing needs of the region and distribute this need evenly across the region, SCAG has provided Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) targets for creating a certain number of affordable housing units in every city in the region. The City's goal is to provide housing for 375 very low income households and 251 low income households. The City is using its available resources and the housing overlay zoning tool to meet those targeted amounts. e. Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities i. Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups. The Environmental Health Index measures exposure based on EPA estimates of air quality carcinogenic, respiratory and neurological toxins by neighborhood. The higher the scores,the less likely households are exposed to adverse environmental conditions. According to Table 12 Environmental Health Index, there was virtually no difference between the racial/ethnic groups with ranges from 39.99 to 40.42. For those below the poverty line, the range was similar with a range from 38.06 to 40.93. This means that in this category, all City's racial/ethnic population groups and income groups are slightly below the national average in their exposure to environmental issues. The City scored somewhat better than the region where the scores ranged from 26.57 to 41.33 and for those below the poverty line, ranging from 24.89 to 40.58. The wide scoring range for the region would reflect the enormous size of the region. The areas with 23 the greatest exposure to environmental health concerns are located along the freeway. Temecula's exposure to environmental health issues is lower than the region, on average. ii. Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods? According to Map 15-Demographics and Environmental Health and Race/Ethnicity, there was one area east of the Interstate, north of Temecula Parkway, west of Margarita Road and south of Pauba that had a low environmental score in this category, but there was no concentration of any of the protected groups in that area. The only distinguishing feature was that there were few households with families in that area. The Temecula Valley Hospital is located in that area. f. Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity i. Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs. Analysis of the HUD-provided maps and data did not reveal any overarching patterns of poor access to opportunity and did not reveal adverse community factors. However, Census Tract 432.16 on the north side is identified on Map 14 as having high exposure to poverty (1-10). Two of the three block groups are in CDBG-eligible areas and the third is not. Yet the HUD data indicates that the third block group also has a high exposure to poverty. The only Title 1 School in the district is located in this neighborhood. The area is characterized by commercial retail and uses and the presences of a mix of multi-family and single family housing. Two of the multi-family complexes in one of the block groups are subsidized, the 40-unit Oak Tree Apartments on Lyndie Lane and the 55 unit Rancho California Apartments off of Margarita Road. There are a number of subsidized units west of Interstate 15, which is a CDBG-eligible area, but that area does not have a high exposure factor. This could be partly because the City has focused its CDBG and local funds in addressing this area. The City does not show any patterns of segregation, nor does it have any RECAPS. 2. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about disparities in access to opportunity in the 24 jurisdiction and region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. Consultations with residents and stakeholders confirmed the HUD-provided information regarding the lack of disparities in access to opportunity in Temecula affecting groups with other protected characteristics. b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of disparities in access to opportunity, including any activities aimed at improving access to opportunities for areas that may lack such access, or in promoting access to opportunity (e.g., proficient schools,employment opportunities,and transportation). Consultations with residents and stakeholders confirmed the HUD-provided information regarding the lack of disparities in access to opportunity in Temecula affecting groups with other protected characteristics. The City is involved in a number of efforts aimed at improving air quality of the entire region including the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Clean Cities Coalition, which aims to reduce the consumption of petroleum fuels. The City also participates in WRCOG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The TUMF program makes improvements to the regional transportation system and provides transportation demand management through funds from new development. 3. Contributing Factors of Disparities in Access to Opportunity Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of disparities in access to opportunity. ❑ Access to financial services ❑ The availability,type, frequency, and reliability of public transportation ❑ Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods ❑ Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities ❑ Lack of regional cooperation ❑ Land use and zoning laws ❑ Lending Discrimination ❑ Location of employers ❑ Location of environmental health hazards ❑ Location of proficient schools and school assignment policies ❑ Location and type of affordable housing ❑ Occupancy codes and restrictions ❑ Private discrimination Z Other: None of the maps and tables provided by HUD, nor our consultations with residents and stakeholders revealed any significant disparities in access opportunities. iv. Disproportionate Housing Needs 25 1. Analysis a. Which groups (by race/ethnicity and family status) experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing burdens when compared to other groups? HUD requires all grantees to compare and assess the burdens for housing for different groups in the community. A disproportionately greater burden exists when the members of a particular group experience a housing problem at a greater rate(90 percent or more)than the group as a whole. Table 9-Demographics of Households with Disproportionate Housing Needs shows the percentage of race/ethnicity groups and families with children experiencing two potential categories of housing burden. The first category is households experiencing one of four housing problems: ■ Housing cost burden (defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities) ■ Overcrowding ■ Lacking a complete kitchen ■ Lacking plumbing The second category is households experiencing "one of four severe housing problems"which are: ■ Severe housing cost burden (defined as paying more than 50% of one's income for monthly housing costs including utilities) ■ Overcrowding ■ Lacking a complete kitchen ■ Lacking plumbing Table 10-Demographics of Household with Severe Housing Cost Burden demonstrates the number and percentage of persons by race/ethnicity and family size experiencing severe housing cost burden. There is no substantial difference between racial and ethnic groups. Non-family households demonstrated the highest cost burdens. The City scores are reflective of the region. According to Table 9, half of the City's households are experiencing one of the four housing problems identified above. There is a disparity in this category with 47.37% of the White households experiencing a housing problem, Asians at 54.31% and Blacks at 55.04%. Hispanics are higher at 62.24% and Native Americans at 80.90%. For severe housing problems, they range from 20.76% for White households to 35.56% for Hispanic households. Native Americans were at 33.71%. 26 Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Map 6 - Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) provides the location of the limited number of publicly supported and HVC housing units in the City. Given the housing costs in the City and the region,there is a high demand for affordable rental housing. While comparable with the region, all households, except Black households, were slightly more burdened in the City than in the region. For those below the poverty level, all groups, except for Native Americans, were less burdened in the City than in the region. Based on our examination of the data in Table 9 and demonstrated in Map 7-Housing Cost Burden and Race/Ethnicity, there were no disproportionate housing problems based on race, ethnicity, national origin, household type and size. These results are not unexpected with the high costs of housing in Southern California as a whole. b. Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas,or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas? There are no RECAPS in the city. While mostly uniform throughout the city, the greatest housing burden appears to be in the far north and adjacent to it in the wealthier parts of the city. In the lower-income neighborhoods, there is much less of a housing burden. According to Map 7-Housing Cost Burden, the greatest housing burdens are in the Temecula Elementary School neighborhood which has a concentration of apartments on the far north, which would indicate the need for affordable rental housing. While there are two subsidized housing projects in the area, which should lower the housing burden scores, there are also several market-rate apartment complexes as well. c. Compare the needs of families with children for housing units with two,and three or more bedrooms with the available existing housing stock in each category of publicly supported housing. Based on the data in the Table 11, there are a limited number of Project Based Section 8 units for families in the City. There are 54 two- and three-bedroom units and only 36 units are households with children. There are also a limited number of Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV) units where there are 30 two- and three-bedroom units and only thirteen units are households with children. Additional affordable housing units for families continue to be a high demand in the City. d. Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner occupied housing by race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region. For the City, 67% of the households are owner-occupied and 33% are renter occupied. While general conclusions may be drawn, the data was not provided by HUD and is not available at the local level by tenure. It is evident that there 27 continues to be a high demand for Section 8 vouchers due to the housing cost burden experienced by renters. 2. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about disproportionate housing needs in the jurisdiction and region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. Based on a consultation with Inland Regional Center, and feedback from the community workshops, there is a large need in the region for affordable housing for adults with developmental disabilities. According to the Center, there are 651 persons with developmental disabilities in the three zip codes (92590, 92591 and 92592) that comprise the Temecula area. Some of these include large rural areas outside the City and it is believed that at least 200 of these individuals live outside the City limits. Regionally, many of those who independently live in group homes face substandard conditions, according to Inland Regional Center. However, they indicate that this is not an issue within the City. The greatest demand is for studio and one-bedroom units for those with low and moderate disabilities. In addition, there is a growing number of families for families with autistic children in the community. The stress on families with autistic children is creating a demand for housing single parent units. Often there is more than child with autism in the home creating, the demand for larger three and four bedroom units. Children with autism require housing units to address their sensory needs, such as dimmer lights and controls on hot water faucets. Inland Regional Center also advised that these units not be concentrated in a single complex so that integration of these families can be achieved. The City has met with developers regarding the needs of residents with special needs. Some developers are willing to include options in the construction of new homes that meet the sensory needs of residents with disabilities. b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of disproportionate housing needs. For PHAs, such information may include a PHA's overriding housing needs analysis. The City does not manage any public housing projects. 3. Contributing Factors of Disproportionate Housing Needs Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of disproportionate housing needs. Z The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes ❑ Displacement of residents due to economic pressures ❑ Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods ❑ Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities ❑ Land use and zoning laws 28 ❑ Lending Discrimination Z Other: Increased demand of affordable housing with supportive services to serve special needs populations. C. Publicly Supported Housing Analysis 1. Analysis a. Publicly Supported Housing Demographics i. Are certain racial/ethnic groups more likely to be residing in one category of publicly supported housing than other categories (public housing, project-based Section 8, Other HUD Multifamily Assisted developments, and Housing Choice Voucher(HCV))? Blacks and Hispanics are more likely to be living in Project-based Section 8 housing units than reflective of the overall City percentages for these racial and ethnic groups. According to the Housing Authority, there are 109 households receiving Tenant-based Section 8 vouchers in Temecula. Ninety (90) are White, 17 are Black, one is Asian, and one is Native American. Of the 109, 30 are Hispanic and 79 are non-Hispanic. Eighty five (85) are one person households and the rest are families. Seventy-six (76) are elderly and 53 have disabilities. The households are spread across the City with 47 households are in zip code 92590; 51 in 92591 and 11 in 92592. ii. Compare the demographics, in terms of protected class, of residents of each category of publicly supported housing (public housing, project- based Section 8, Other HUD Multifamily Assisted developments, and HCV) to the population in general, and persons who meet the income eligibility requirements for the relevant category of publicly supported housing. Include in the comparison, a description of whether there is a higher or lower proportion of groups based on protected class. According to Table 6-Publicly Supported Housing Residents by Race/Ethnicity, the HCV program (better known as the Tenant Based Section 8) generally reflects the population composition of the City, with the exception of Asians. There are 57% White, 16% Black, 27% Hispanic, but no Asians receive vouchers. It should be noted that Asians do not comprise a large percentage within the City's Section 8 population. There are a greater proportion of Blacks and Hispanics taking advantage of the Project-Based Section 8 program than the general population of the City. Only 37.04% of the residents were White with 20.37% Black and 40.74% Hispanic. Most of the units are occupied by those with incomes less than 30% of the County's median income. According to the Housing Authority of Riverside County, there are 109 tenant-based Section 8 rental assistance vouchers in Temecula. Seventy-six of the households are elderly and 53 have disabilities. Some of the households are elderly and have disabilities. b. Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy 29 i. Describe patterns in the geographic location of publicly supported housing by program category (public housing, project-based Section 8, Other HUD Multifamily Assisted developments, HCV, and LIHTC) in relation to previously discussed segregated areas and R/ECAPs. There are no R/ECAPs or segregated areas in the City. Most of the publicly supportive housing units are located near employment centers and transportation opportunities. ii. Describe patterns in the geographic location for publicly supported housing that primarily serves families with children,elderly persons, or persons with disabilities in relation to previously discussed segregated areas or R/ECAPs? There are no R/ECAPs or segregated areas in the City. iii. How does the demographic composition of occupants of publicly supported housing in RECAPS compare to the demographic composition of occupants of publicly supported housing outside of R/ECAPs? N/A iv. (A) Do any developments of public housing, properties converted under the RAD, and LIHTC developments have a significantly different demographic composition, in terms of protected class, than other developments of the same category? Describe how these developments differ. Black populations have a greater proportion living in public housing than the general population of the City, while Asians have a lower percentage. But with the limited number of units available in the City, it is not believed that these differences are considered significant. (B) Provide additional relevant information, if any, about occupancy, by protected class,in other types of publicly supported housing. No additional data is available. v. Compare the demographics of occupants of developments, for each category of publicly supported housing (public housing, project-based Section 8, Other HUD Multifamily Assisted developments, properties converted under RAD, and LIHTC) to the demographic composition of the areas in which they are located. Describe whether developments that are primarily occupied by one race/ethnicity are located in areas occupied largely by the same race/ethnicity. Describe any differences for housing that primarily serves families with children, elderly persons,or persons with disabilities. All races except Asians are represented in the HUD and LIHTC developments. Black populations have a higher percentage living in publicly 30 supported units compared to the general population of the City. But with the limited number of units available in the City, it is not believed that these differences are considered significant. c. Disparities in Access to Opportunity i. Describe any disparities in access to opportunity for residents of publicly supported housing, including within different program categories (public housing, project-based Section 8, Other HUD Multifamily Assisted Developments, HCV, and LIHTC) and between types (housing primarily serving families with children,elderly persons, and persons with disabilities) of publicly supported housing. According to the HUD supplied data, there were no significant disparities in access to opportunity for residents in publicly supported housing. Anecdotal information gathered through the consultation and stakeholders meetings confirm this. 2. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about publicly supported housing in the jurisdiction and region, particularly information about groups with other protected characteristics and about housing not captured in the HUD-provided data. Consultations with residents and stakeholders did not reveal other information to disparities in publicly-supported housing in Temecula affecting groups. b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of publicly supported housing. Information may include relevant programs, actions, or activities, such as tenant self-sufficiency, place-based investments,or mobility programs. According to the Housing Authority of Riverside County, there are 109 tenant- based Section 8 rental assistance vouchers in Temecula. Seventy-six of the households are elderly and 53 have disabilities. Some of the elderly are also disabled. 3. Contributing Factors of Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues related to publicly supported housing, including Segregation, RECAPS, Disparities in Access to Opportunity, and Disproportionate Housing Needs. For each contributing factor that is significant, note which fair housing issue(s) the selected contributing factor relates to. Consultations with residents and stakeholders did not reveal other information to disparities in access to opportunity in Temecula and the region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. 31 ❑ Admissions and occupancy policies and procedures, including preferences in publicly supported housing ❑ Land use and zoning laws ❑ Community opposition ❑ Impediments to mobility ❑ Lack of private investment in specific neighborhoods ❑ Lack of public investment in specific neighborhoods, including services and amenities ❑ Lack of regional cooperation ❑ Occupancy codes and restrictions ❑ Quality of affordable housing information programs ❑ Siting selection policies, practices and decisions for publicly supported housing, including discretionary aspects of Qualified Allocation Plans and other programs ❑ Source of income discrimination Z Other: High demand for affordable housing, due to the high housing costs in the community and the region D. Disability and Access Analysis 1. Population Profile a. How are persons with disabilities geographically dispersed or concentrated in the jurisdiction and region, including R/ECAPs and other segregated areas identified in previous sections? There are no R/ECAPs or segregated areas in the City. According to Map 16- Disability by Type and Map 17-Disability by Age Group demonstrating the location where the persons with disabilities live, persons with disabilities are scattered throughout the City. There are 53 households with persons with disabilities that receive tenant-based rental assistance. Their addresses are confidential. b. Describe whether these geographic patterns vary for persons with each type of disability or for persons with disabilities in different age ranges. There is no difference in the geographic patterns for persons with disabilities. 2. Housing Accessibility a. Describe whether the jurisdiction and region have sufficient affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes. Data is not available for the total number of accessible units; however, 33% of the City's occupied housing units were built after 2000, according to the 2008- 2012 American Community Survey five year estimates, suggesting that a number of units are adaptable based on California Building Codes in effect during those years. 32 b. Describe the areas where affordable accessible housing units are located. Do they align with R/ECAPs or other areas that are segregated? There are no R/ECAPs in the City and the HUD data did not reveal any areas that were segregated. c. To what extent are persons with different disabilities able to access and live in the different categories of publicly supported housing? According to the Housing Authority, their programs have a Reasonable Accommodation Process to assure that all persons with disabilities are provided with reasonable accommodations for equal access to housing programs. That includes regulations regarding live-in aide and changes in voucher size. 3. Integration of Persons with Disabilities Living in Institutions and Other Segregated Settings a. To what extent do persons with disabilities in or from the jurisdiction or region reside in segregated or integrated settings? There are five licensed developmentally disabled adult residential(18-59) facilities in the City of Temecula. There are 26 beds provided in these facilities. Additional facilities provide day services but would not be considered as institutional settings. Despite these facilities, there are not concentrations of persons with disabilities within the City, according to the Map 16—Disability by Type. b. Describe the range of options for persons with disabilities to access affordable housing and supportive services. As mentioned above, based on a consultation with Inland Regional Center, there is a large need in the region for affordable housing for the developmentally disabled adults. According to the Center, there are 651 persons with developmental disabilities in the three zip codes (92590, 92591 and 92592) that comprise the Temecula area. Some of these include large rural areas outside the City and it is believed that at least 200 of these individuals live outside the City limits. Regionally, many of these adults independently live in group homes, or face substandard conditions, according to the Inland Regional Center. However, none of those homes are located in the City. The greatest demand is for studio and one- bedroom units for those with low and moderate delays. In addition, there is a growing population of for families with children with autism. The stress on families with children with autism is creating a demand for housing units with additional bedrooms. Children with autism require housing units to address sensory needs such as dimmer lights and controls on hot water faucets. Mr. Toms also advised that these units not be concentrated in a single complex so that integration of these families can be achieved. The City of Temecula employs an inclusion program specialist in the Human Services Division of the Community Services Department. The City has pioneered a progressive program called "High Hopes" that provides recreation programs for 33 adults and children with developmental disabilities. They offer a wide variety of recreation, enrichment and vocational programs that are geared toward those with specific needs of individuals with disabilities. They not only serve those within the City of Temecula, but the program is so popular that people drive their family members more than two hours away to participate in the inclusionary programs. In addition to a City staff inclusion specialist, the City has developed a webpage that provides parents, caregivers and individuals with a list of local resources in the community. The Human Services Resource Guide includes information on local resources that serve special needs, aging adults and military, limited income, and at- risk youth/families and much more. The site also provides the phone number of the City staff person who can provide additional assistance. The City also has a Facebook page for the "Family First" program that connects people with special needs. The website for the guide is located here: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Residents/Youth/Human+Services+Resour ce+Guide.htm In addition there are a number of other programs in the area designed for persons with special needs. They include the following in the Temecula-Murrieta area: • Top Soccer: Temecula • Up H.O.P.E: Temecula, Horseback riding. • Kindermusik: Temecula,Music program • High Hopes: Temecula,Performing arts. Singing, dance,photography, and more. Older teens and adults. • My Gym(Capp's Kids): Murrieta • S.C.E.G.: Temecula. Gymnastics, special needs friendly. • Actors Unlimited: Temecula.Performing Arts • Cal Oaks Pool: Murrieta. Summer swim lessons sponsored by the Special Olympics. • Baseball:Murrieta. • Musicians Workshop: Temecula. http://www.musiciansworkshop.org Guitar, choir, orchestra. • Pump it Up/Fun Zone: Murrieta. Sensory Time: Murrieta. Child Play Center. http://www.sensorytimecenter.com Periodically the City Building and Safety Department holds workshops for the construction industry to discuss changes in the Americans with Disability Act(ADA) requirements. The last workshop was held on March 1,2015. 4. Disparities in Access to Opportunity a. To what extent are persons with disabilities able to access the following? Identify major barriers faced concerning: i. Government services and facilities: City Hall and other City facilities are fully accessible to persons with disabilities. The City needs to adopt an ADA 34 Transition Plan to identify if there are any remaining ADA needs at other public facilities. ii. Public infrastructure (e.g., sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, pedestrian signals): Many of the City's sidewalks and intersections are ADA compliant and where there are existing needs, the City is addressing them in conjunction with other construction projects. The City is currently constructing segments of missing sidewalks in Old Town, which can be an impediment to residents accessing City services, the neighborhood park, and the neighborhood grocery store. The City intends to replace wooden sidewalks along Old Town Front Street,removing an impediment to seniors and those with disabilities. The City is at the forefront in the region in terms of addressing the recreational needs of those persons with physical disabilities. The City recently completed the construction of the Eagle Soar Playground and Splash Pad at Margarita Park. The purpose of the park is to be inclusive and accessible in addressing the unique needs of children with and without disabilities. A description of this popular program is included as Appendix N. The City continues to upgrade its infrastructure to address the physical barriers of persons with disabilities. Nearly all of the intersections along major streets have accessible ramps. Whenever there are improvements made to an intersection, the intersection is upgraded to address the needs of residents with vision impairments. iii. Transportation: The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has accessibility ramps on their buses. RTA also provides a Dial-A-Ride program designed to meet the needs of those with disabilities. Fares are significantly reduced for the elderly and persons with disabilities. According to the RTA Short Range Transit Plan 2014-2016, "All RTA vehicles comply with clean fuel policies and come fully equipped with ADA accessible wheelchair lifts,including the paratransit vans. In addition, all fixed route vehicles are equipped with bicycle racks." According to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, the greatest problem with the Dial-A-Ride programs is that persons cannot depend upon these services for timely pickups. iv. Proficient schools and educational programs: The City does not have jurisdiction over the school district, and thus has limited influence on its programming. There was a lawsuit claiming that the Temecula Valley Unified School District discriminated against special education students at Vail Ranch Middle School by denying them instruction in social studies and sciences, instead doubling up on math and English classes. They doubled up on math and English classes instead. The case determined that the School District cannot discriminate against those with disabilities.The situation has been corrected. v. Jobs: According to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, the greatest priority in California is providing meaningful jobs that are not below the minimum wage for those working adults with disabilities. It was originally thought that it was acceptable to provide less that minimum wage to give persons with disabilities access to jobs; however, research has found this leads to employer abuse. There are now steps to being taken to change this practice at the 35 State level by introducing legislation. The City's Office of Economic Development and Community Services Department have an annual internship program for teenagers and adults with special needs and developmental disabilities to learn valuable job skills and lead them on the path towards self- sufficiency. b. Describe the processes that exist in the jurisdiction and region for persons with disabilities to request and obtain reasonable accommodations and accessibility modifications to address the barriers discussed above. The City is in compliance with State and federal law with respect to its ordinance providing reasonable accommodations to persons with disabilities. In addition to information provided elsewhere in this assessment,the City has adopted a reasonable accommodation ordinance to provide exceptions in zoning and land use for housing persons with disabilities. The City annually evaluates constraints on development, maintenance, and improvement to housing for persons with disabilities, including the review of land use controls, permit procedures, and building codes for the development of housing for persons with disabilities. c. Describe any difficulties in achieving homeownership experienced by persons with disabilities and by persons with different types of disabilities. Affordable housing is an issue for most segments of the community, but it is especially a challenge for persons with disabilities. According to Inland Regional Center, the demand for affordable housing is high in the City. There is a demand for studio and one-bedroom units for persons with disabilities with low and moderate delay issues as well as larger units for especially single parent families with children with autism. 5. Disproportionate Housing Needs a. Describe any disproportionate housing needs experienced by persons with disabilities and by persons with certain types of disabilities. In consulting with the Fair Housing Council, the greatest proportion of fair housing complaints are from persons with disabilities in both the City and the region. Landlords are unaware or unwilling to make requested accommodations, either in modifications to a unit or allowing for service animals. State law requires landlords to make reasonable accommodations, when requested, to their units so that accessibility issues are mitigated. Therefore, the greatest priority in this area continues to be educating landlords and property managers on the rights of persons with disabilities to ensure that discrimination is not limiting their access to housing. 6. Additional Information a. Beyond the HUD-provided data, provide additional relevant information, if any, about disability and access issues in the jurisdiction and region affecting groups with other protected characteristics. The City treats licensed residential care units serving six or fewer residents as single family dwellings permitted by right as part of the zoning ordinance. Facilities 36 serving more than six are similarly permitted by right in high density residential zone districts and are also conditionally permitted in any other residential zone. Table 14 provides data of persons with disabilities by age range (5-17, 18-64, and 65+) for the City and region. The table reflects the greatest numbers of those with disabilities are adults between ages 18 and 64 followed by the elderly. Proportionately, compared to the region, the City has fewer people with disabilities, except for children. Some of this may be because of the large draw of the City's services for the special needs population. This belief was reflected in the community meetings. b. The program participant may also describe other information relevant to its assessment of disability and access issues. No additional information. 7. Disability and Access Issues Contributing Factors Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of disability and access issues and the fair housing issues, which are Segregation, RECAPS, Disparities in Access to Opportunity, and Disproportionate Housing Needs. For each contributing factor, note which fair housing issue(s)the selected contributing factor relates to. ❑ Access to proficient schools for persons with disabilities ❑ Access to publicly supported housing for persons with disabilities ❑ Access to transportation for persons with disabilities ❑ Inaccessible government facilities or services Z Inaccessible sidewalks,pedestrian crossings, or other infrastructure ❑ Lack of affordable in-home or community-based supportive services ❑ Lack of affordable, accessible housing in range of unit sizes ❑ Lack of affordable, integrated housing for individuals who need supportive services ❑ Lack of assistance for housing accessibility modifications ❑ Lack of assistance for transitioning from institutional settings to integrated housing ❑ Land use and zoning laws ❑ Lending Discrimination ❑ Location of accessible housing ❑ Occupancy codes and restrictions ❑ Regulatory barriers to providing housing and supportive services for persons with disabilities ❑ State or local laws, policies, or practices that discourage individuals with disabilities from being placed in or living in apartments, family homes, and other integrated settings Z Other: City will prepare and adopt an ADA Transition Plan 37 E. Fair Housing Enforcement,Outreach Capacity,and Resources Analysis 1. List and summarize any of the following that have not been resolved: • A charge or letter of finding from HUD concerning a violation of a civil rights- related law, • A cause determination from a substantially equivalent state or local fair housing agency concerning a violation of a state or local fair housing law, a letter of findings issued by or lawsuit filed or joined by the Department of Justice alleging a pattern or practice or systemic violation of a fair housing or civil rights law,or • A claim under the False Claims Act related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, or civil rights generally,including an alleged failure to affirmatively further fair housing. In addition to the City's CDBG funding to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, the Fair Housing Council received a five year Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) grant from 2010-2015 for private enforcement, and in 2015 received an additional $270,895 for another three-year grant for that purpose. Under the previous contract, the Council conducted fifteen tests in Temecula. Six of the tests were conducted for lending institutions and nine for rental projects. Two of the cases warranted sending to HUD as civil rights violations. One of those cases was against a lending agent who did not provide an African American all of the loan options that other applicants were provided. The second case was a rental manager who was accused of discriminating against a person with disabilities who was not allowed a support animal. Of the remaining thirteen, seven are pending further testing and six were closed. (For more detail the FHIP investigations, refer to Appendix L.) In 2013, the Fair Housing Council also settled a familial status case. The Council noted that those who have had fair housing complaints filed against them, often voluntarily send new employees to Council training sessions. In addition to the enforcement grant, the Fair Housing Council has applied for an additional $125,000 grant for education and operations which, if approved, would begin in October. According to the Fair Housing Council, the patterns of discrimination are more individualized than systemic. They saw a spike in complaints, particularly against persons with disabilities, during the recession when many realtors turned to rental management. They were not as familiar with rental fair housing laws as they were with sale of property. The greatest priority for the Fair Housing Council in the category is in training and education, especially new real estate agents and property managers. 2. Describe any state or local fair housing laws. What characteristics are protected under each law? The California Fair Employment and Housing Act provides protection from harassment or discrimination based on the following: age, ancestry, color, disability, marital status, medical condition, genetic information, national origin, race, sex, familial status, religion, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, source of 38 income, and arbitrary discrimination. This year the State legislature added primary language, citizenship and immigrant status to the protected class status. 3. Identify any local and regional agencies and organizations that provide fair housing information, outreach,and enforcement,including their capacity and the resources available to them. The City of Temecula contracts with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. The City has funded this organization with CDBG since becoming an Entitlement City in 2012. The Fair Housing Council is located 45 miles from Temecula, and unfortunately Fair Housing does not have sufficient funds to locate an office in the Temecula Valley. The Fair Housing Council indicates that,because of the distance, it is difficult to provide the same level of service as with other cities in the County. 4. Additional Information a. Provide additional relevant information, if any, about fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity,and resources in the jurisdiction and region. As described above, the City provides CDBG funds to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County for landlord tenant services, training and discrimination complaints. During the last fiscal year (July 1, 2015-June 30, 2016), there were calls from fifteen households regarding discrimination issues above the ones described under the FHIP discussion above in Temecula. Of that group, 87% were from White renter households. Most were from households with disabled persons. The City provides fair housing brochures at City counter, public libraries and community centers. Links and information are provided on the City webpage. During that same period, there were 222 calls to the Fair Housing Council regarding landlord-tenant issues. Of those calls, 57% were from White households, 20% from Hispanic households and 17% from Black households. The greatest number of calls pertained to lease and rental terms, notices to vacate and evictions, security deposits, repairs and rent increases. The greatest gap in the City in this category is the provision of affordable housing for new homebuyers and renters. There are a number of issues that the Fair Housing Council has identified: large families have difficulty finding landlords that will rent to them; unreasonable conditions placed on children; homeowners associations have restrictions on service animals for the disabled; rent increases are forcing lower income renters out of the local market; and crime-free restrictions create disparate treatment of minorities. In addition, HUD's fair market rent limits are lower than the average rents in Temecula. It is increasingly difficult for tenants to find units that meet those limitations with their vouchers, as there are an insufficient number of rental units that charge rents at or below HUD's current rental limits. b. The program participant may also include information relevant to programs, actions,or activities to promote fair housing outcomes and capacity. 39 The Fair Housing Council provides training for the Southwest Riverside Realtors Association twice a year. City staff refers residents to the Fair Housing Council and there is a link on the City's website that directs them to the Fair Housing Council's website. 5. Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Contributing Factors Consider the listed factors and any other factors affecting the jurisdiction and region. Identify factors that significantly create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity, and resources and the fair housing issues, which are Segregation,RECAPS,Disparities in Access to Opportunity, and Disproportionate Housing Needs. For each significant contributing factor, note which fair housing issue(s)the selected contributing factor impacts. ❑ Lack of local private fair housing outreach and enforcement ❑ Lack of local public fair housing enforcement Z Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations ❑ Lack of state or local fair housing laws ❑ Unresolved violations of fair housing or civil rights law ❑ Other: 40 V. Fair Housing Goals and Priorities 1. For each fair housing issue, prioritize the identified contributing factors. Justify the prioritization of the contributing factors that will be addressed by the goals set below in Question 2. Give the highest priority to those factors that limit or deny fair housing choice or access to opportunity, or negatively impact fair housing or civil rights compliance. Please refer to the City's Fair Housing Goals and Priorities on the following pages. 2. For each fair housing issue with significant contributing factors identified in Question 1,set one or more goals. Explain how each goal is designed to overcome the identified contributing factor and related fair housing issue(s). For goals designed to overcome more than one fair housing issue, explain how the goal will overcome each issue and the related contributing factors. For each goal, identify metrics and milestones for determining what fair housing results will be achieved, and indicate the timeframe for achievement. Please refer to the City's Fair Housing Goals and Priorities on the following pages. 41 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Adopt an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance that would identify sites Increase the High demand throughout the City(Summer 2017). affordable Location and type of of affordable • Enter into an agreement with potential City of Temecula housing stock in affordable housing housing developers to allocate $12.4 million in Tax the City Allocation bond proceeds to construct additional affordable housing(Spring 2017). Number of affordable units to be determined. Discussion: The AHO ordinance would allow transitional and supportive housing by right in certain areas, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing, and establish a density bonus program. 42 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Explore and evaluate a partnership with Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoQ for the provision of services for the homeless in southwestern Riverside County. (Spring 2018) • Continue to participate in the Regional Partner with local High housing costs Homeless Alliance in jointly addressing organizations for in region; Distance regional homeless needs. (Ongoing) County of Riverside, City the provision of from social services: High demand . Continue to work with the Riverside County of Temecula, Southwest services to No homeless shelter for affordable housing Sheriff's Department on the provision of Riverside Regional address in Southwestern services to the homeless (Ongoing) Homeless Alliance homelessness Riverside County • Continue to encourage and support local non- profit groups that address the housing needs of homeless and other disadvantaged groups (Ongoing). • Continue to permit emergency shelters in areas permitted by the City of Temecula Municipal Code. (Ongoing) Discussion: The City provides CDBG funds for an Inclement Weather Shelter, but there is a regional demand for a year round facility for emergency and transitional housing. Several local non-profits, such as Project TOUCH and SAFE, offer transitional and emergency housing in the community. Funding may be available on a competitive basis through Continuum of Care. 43 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Continue to support and promote the High housing costs Mortgage Credit Certificate program and the High demand Increase in the region; for affordable State of California Housing Finance Agency homeownership Location and housing for (CalHFA) (Ongoing). County of Riverside, City opportunities in availability of first time • Evaluate the formation of a partnership with of Temecula the City affordable new and homebuyers the County of Riverside to receive HOME existing houses funds for a first time homebuyer or housing rehab program(Spring 2020). Discussion: As consistent with the rest of Riverside County, the City's housing prices have increased over the last few years. Many assistance programs are now out of reach for first time homebuyers. • Adopt an ADA Transition Plan to evaluate Existence of public facilities to ensure equal access for some persons with disabilities (Summer 2018) Increase Architectural architectural • Continue to increase public awareness and barriers may educate representatives of the housing accessibility to barriers for persons prevent equal industry on ADA requirements by holding City of Temecula public facilities with disabilities access for workshops (Ongoing) persons with • Continue to upgrade the City's infrastructure disabilities to make them more accessible for those with disabilities. (Ongoing) Discussion: City facilities and parks are ADA compliant. As part of the City's Capital Improvement Program, the City has identified improvements that can be made to public facilities, such as the replacement of sidewalks. There are several sections of sidewalk improvements proposed in Old Town, as identified in the Capital Improvement Program budget. 44 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Continue to provide support for fair housing Landlords and Equal access to training and education by including Support the Fair housing for all information on the City's website and the property managers City of Temecula, Fair Housing Council populations distribution of materials at City facilities on education on have a lack of including (Ongoing) Housing Council of fair housing laws knowledge protected • Continue to support applications for federal housing issues fair Riverside County classes funding by local fair housing organizations. (Ongoing) Discussion: Lack of knowledge on fair housing issues amongst property owners and landlords continues to be the primary reason for discrimination complaints. • Continue to promote the preservation of affordable housing projects at-risk of converting to market-rate housing. (Ongoing) Preserve High demand for Supply of • Continue to support the County of Riverside County of Riverside, City affordable rental affordable housing affordable to administer the Section 8 program of Temecula housing rental housing (Ongoing). • Continue to use, when feasible, City-owned and City-controlled land for affordable housing projects. (Ongoing) Discussion: There is a high demand for affordable rental housing in the City. The City will continue to support the preservation of units that are scheduled to convert after their affordability period expires. 45 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) Increase housing Increased demand of Sufficient • Continue to promote housing design affordable housing affordable choices for those for seniors and rental housing standards that improve accessibility for those City of Temecula, with special needs with special needs including seniors,persons Housing Providers persons with for those with and disabilities disabilities special needs. with disabilities (Ongoing) Discussion: There is a high demand for housing that is both accessible and affordable for seniors and persons with disabilities, especially since these populations appear to be increasing. Some seniors choose to move from the area in order to seek more affordable housing solutions and access to services. 46 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing u it Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Hou sing Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation options as development occurs (Ongoing). • Continue to partner with the Riverside Transit Agency and fund select Increase access transportation routes throughout the City and usage of Demand for public High demand for public (Ongoing). City of Temecula, public transportation transportation • Continue to collaborate with regional Developers, RTA transportation. partners on the analysis of a regional transportation center in Temecula(Ongoing). • Construct a Park and Ride Facility on Temecula Parkway to encourage alternative transportation and the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. (Winter 2016) Discussion: The entire region faces the challenge of the provision of low cost transportation and increasing access. Public transportation is under the jurisdiction of the Riverside Transit Authority. The City will continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation. A new Park and Ride facility is under construction and is expected to be completed in Winter 2016. 47 City of Temecula Fair Housing Goals and Priorities Contributing Housing Metrics,Milestones,and Timeframe for Responsible Program Goal Factors Issues using Achievement Participant(s) • Continue to require developers to construct multi-use trails in conjunction with the 2016 Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update. (Ongoing) alternative Improve the Proximity of the I- Availability of . Continue to participate the Western City of Temecula environmental 15 freeway and modes of Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition, a Community Development health of major arterial partnership aimed at reducing the and Public Works neighborhoods. corridors transportation in the region consumption of petroleum fuels. (Ongoing) Departments • Continue to pursue AB 2766 resources, a funding source aimed at improving air quality, to fund signal timing, sidewalk, and bike lane projects. (Ongoing). Discussion: Due to the proximity of the I-15 freeway and major arterial corridors, the City of Temecula and region as a whole strives to improve air quality. The City of Temecula will continue to require developers to construct multi-use trails in conjunction with the 2016 Multi- Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, continue its participation in the nationally recognized Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition, and to purse AB 2766 funds. 48 APPENDIX A HUD-Provided Maps Map Series Title Map 1 Race and Ethnicity Trends(20 10).................................................................1 Map 2 Race and Ethnicity Trends(1990) ................................................................3 Map 3 National Origin(2010)..................................................................................5 Map 4 Limited English Proficiency(LEP)with R/ECAPs ......................................6 Map 5 Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity..........................................8 Map 6 Housing Choice Vouchers and Race/Ethnicity...........................................10 Map 7 Housing Burden and Race/Ethnicity...........................................................12 Map 8 Housing Burden and National Origin..........................................................14 Map 9 Demographics and School Proficiency School Proficiency and Race/Ethnicity..........................................16 School Proficiency and National Origin........................................18 School Proficiency and Family Status ...........................................20 Map 10 Demographics and Job Proximity Job Proximity and Race/Ethnicity..................................................22 Job Proximity and National Origin................................................24 Job Proximity and Family Status...................................................26 Map 11 Demographics and Labor Market Labor Market and Race/Ethnicity..................................................28 Labor Market and National Origin.................................................30 Labor Market and Family Status....................................................32 Map 12 Demographics and Transit Trips Transit Trips and Race/Ethnicity....................................................34 Transit Trips and National Origin..................................................36 Transit Trips and Family Status.....................................................38 Map 13 Demographics and Low Transportation Cost Low Transportation Cost and Race/Ethnicity................................40 Low Transportation Cost and National Origin...............................41 Low Transportation Cost and Family Status..................................43 Map 14 Demographics and Poverty Poverty and Race/Ethnicity............................................................45 Poverty and National Origin..........................................................47 Poverty and Family Status.............................................................49 Map 15 Demographics and Environmental Health Environmental Health and Race/Ethnicity.....................................51 Environmental Health and National Origin....................................53 Environmental Health and Family Status.......................................55 Map 16 Disability by Type Hearing,Vision and Cognitive Disability......................................57 Ambulatory, Self-Care and Independent Living Disability............59 Map 17 Disability by Age Group.............................................................................61 HUD-Provided Maps As described in the narrative, the City of Temecula is located in the corner of the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which is the largest MSA in the continental United States. It is so large that the Assessment of Fair Housing could not include the entire region on the maps without losing all relevant data. The region is larger than ten of the smallest U.S. states. Most of the population is located in the southwest comer and while Temecula appears to be near these population centers because of the scale of the map, it is actually over 40 miles from the City of Riverside and 70 miles from the Cities of San Bernardino and Ontario, the largest cities in the region, and 75 miles away from the retirement desert towns and farming areas to the east. Mountain ranges separate Temecula from population centers to the west in Orange County, as well as the eastern portions of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. As required by HUD, the City has included a series of maps and tables that analyze demographic trends, integration and segregation, disparities in access to opportunity, housing needs, disability access, publicly supported housing, and fair housing needs. The following series of maps is organized such that the first map shows the relationship between the City and the region, and subsequent maps are organized so that a City data topical map will be presented first, followed by the regional map. The maps are numbered to correspond with HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing(AFFH)AFFH data system.The map numbers correspond to the topic. Map 1 — Race/Ethnicity Trends (2010) Map Information AFFHT Maps Te rnecuW(CDBG} 'r' • Name:Map 1-RacefEthnicity • •,'; {• '+* • , Description:Current racelethnicity dot density mal • • v' ,, • • • for Jurisdiction and Region with �s r leek • • RfECAPs + �• t r Jurisdiction:Temecula(CDBG) • r Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, • , ' •r, .., CA '' • Legend TOC • Dot Value:1 dot= 75 • A' ' • , � Demographics 2070 • •�. .` 1 Dot=75 ••%+ � * � White,Non-Hispanic • • - •• ' ` • �' . +�Black,Non-Hispanic Native American,Non-Hispanic • ,�,Y• • • •' +, e'r'Asian:'Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic • +•iw, • }�Hispanic Z+w Other:Non-Hispanic » • • , ;'` Y TRACT " • •' '• RtECAP Map 1 demonstrates geographic patterns of racial and ethnic concentrations in 2010. Each dot represents 75 persons. This map demonstrates that racial and ethnic groups are spread evenly throughout the City of Temecula. There is no significant segregation within the City. Appendix A 1 Map 1 - Race/Ethnicity (Race/Ethnicity) Current racelethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with PJECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurlsidlction • .• • CBSA • «` • «. j•, .. +• a GRANTEES •• ^ Demographics 2010 t ' • 1 Dot=75 ' , ' . ' ^ %}P•White,Non-Hispanic 4, Black.Non-Hispanic !- "" .»• , Native American.Non-Hispanic -Y� AsianlPa cifc Islander..Non-Hispanic + a' a �%. •�j •• ..•. :,;• ' �!Hispanic �' - -- •• 3 Other,Non-Hispanic •a "•r• .`, TRACT • . RfECAP •••Y• ¢41~•�' i • 4 l »} 1 , •.:" � .r• Wit '.y,�``�'e« • 7i � • . » s • SIP li 'i.• •s�`e Esd.HERET BeLgrpp,e,NyGf#„V5G5,NPS I United States Census Bureau _ The regional map is provided to add context and point out the large size of the Metropolitan Statistical Area(MSA) accounted for in regional data comparisons supplied by HUD. To better evaluate the data, the scale of the map has been reduced in the remaining regional maps. However, much of the detail is lost due to the scale. As indicated in the narrative, because of its location and distance from the population centers further north, the characteristics of the City data is not always comparable to the region as a whole. Note that the City of Temecula is shown in dark red at the southwest corner of the region. Appendix A 2 Map 2 — Race/Ethnicity Trends (1990) O= Map Information Temecula(CDBG} Name:Map 2-RacelEthni city Trends Variation:R a ce)Ethni city Trends,1990 Description:Past racelethnicity dot density map h Jurisdiction and Region with RIECAPs Jurisdiction::Temecula(CDBG) • Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA • Legend TOC Dot Value:I dot= 75 • Demographics 1990 1 Dot=75 1n�g; White,Non-Hispanic • Black,Non-Hispanic lir ' Native American,Non-Hispanic a;'! • E"lq AsianlPacifc Islander,Non-Hispanic .41.% • • ivf�Hispanic • TRACT • RIECAP Map 2 demonstrates geographic patterns of racial and ethnic concentrations in 1990. In comparing the maps from 1990 and 2010,there are no significant concentrations of segregation that have developed, despite tremendous growth that has occurred during the period. Appendix A 3 Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trends (Race/Ethnicity Trends, 1990) Past race.+ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R+ECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction CBSA .� °• r� ♦ k ��LA -�� -yak} •. • • s .• • • " ' � " • vr• •S'r .•�.rx�'•• •a `-. •t S • - GRANTEES !v, ! •a S9 S1. =•y«r. ' Demographics 1990 `•x �'�.e rs';i'�`--' ;4, 'E�*+-"� � , r ' , ,k •"'+ , White,Non-Hispanic .• S-ti S __ , - civ�' j._• - - id?11a i Black,Non-Hispanic t ti et :- �� Y ! ; y � �` • e ��Native American.Non-Hispanic • - - S. ' }�Asian;Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic '�;. +',� -Tr^3. • ,y. °.. ..S w Hispanic �;r .• t#xa, .S 1+ •,4•y, TRACT ,bs;�e 1. S' •,! }S+i• 'i• ��.`,�. • , ! ,� RIECAP A Esn.HERE DeLomi NGA,USGS.NPS•i United States Census Bureau '' C Map 2 demonstrates the racial composition in the region in 1990 and it shows the tremendous growth of Hispanics in the population centers of the north. The City has also shown a less dramatic growth rate than the region. Appendix A 4 Map 3 — National Origin (2010) 0= Temecula(COBG) Name:Map 3-National Origin Description:Current national origin t5 most populous;dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with RiECAPs Jurlsdiction:Temecula(CDBGl Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. CA Legend TOC • Dot Value:1 dot= 75 • • NationI Origin(Top 5 in Descending O€derk • 1Dot=75 People • �r 'e.Mexico P�1, • 'w'w.�y��+j'Philippines IL'4I Korea • i`, EI Salvador India TRACT • RIECAP ----� rim .:r_ Map 3 demonstrates population by national origin in Temecula, based on ACS data provided by HUD(2006-2010). There are no significant concentrations of persons based on national origin. Instead they are spread evenly throughout the City. Appendix A 5 Map 4 — Limited English Proficiency (LEP) with Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) 0 - Temecula(CDRG} Name:Map A-LEP Description:LEPpersons[5 most cornrnonly user languages;for Jurisdiction and Region with R;ECAPs Jurisdiction:Temecula rCDBG"i Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. CA Legend TCC Dot Value:1 dot= 75 ' Limited English Proficiency(Top 5 in Descending Order 1 Dot=75 People IS- Spanish Tagalog Korean i Chinese WT,Thai • TRACT WECAP Map 4 demonstrates where persons with limited English proficiency live, based on ACS data provided by HUD (2006-2010). There are no significant concentrations of persons with limited English proficiency within the City. They are spread evenly throughout the community. Appendix A 6 Map 4 - LEP (Limited English Proficiency) LEP persons(5 most commonly used languages)for Jurisdiction and Region with RIECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisldiction CSB SSA GRANTEES Limited English Proficiency(Top 5 in Descending Orderl '+s �'• . 1 Dot=75 People Spanish •Lt tirj, :I. ,¢ Iri:.. � :a:.. � � r_P��Tagalog Korean . .t Chinese �. a.1 a ��:i• -+ S .• 1 \ N Thai 'a TRACT ..•Sly ` `,» .` �a}'' .. 'r RIECAP , r. . y' Esri.HERE.Del e.MGA..USGS,CIPS I United States Census Bureau s Map 4 demonstrates where those with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) lived throughout the region in 2010. They were concentrated in the population centers to the north. The City has some limited English proficiency residents, but they are not concentrated in one section of the City. Appendix A 7 Map 5 — S Publicly upported Housing and Race/Ethnicity Map Information • •• r AFFHT Maps Temecula(CDBG) Name:Map 5-Publicly Supported Housing and RacelEthnicity •• , Description:Public Housing,Project-Based Section 8,Other Multifamily,and • + • LIHTC locations mapped with _ - , s* racelethnicity dot density map with • ' + RtECAPs.distinguishing • s - y categories of publicly supported • • , •- r • 2 • • housing by color • ,t • ••tit '•'w Legend TOC r , If w .r • •®• • ti • Dot Value:itlot= 75 « S�• - +' Public Housing • �•t , 'i,. Other Multifamily Project-Based section 0 C) C) •+ 4 • •, • a`• , • LIHTC • ' • 0 a • Demographics 2010 • r F •• • ;t White.Non-Hispanic « ft S « • • I•� • • • « r��Black,Non-Hispanic •• • • •�, ;i• „ r. + Native American.Non-Hispanic Map 5 demonstrates where subsidized housing is located throughout the City, based on the 2010 Census. Subsidized housing is primarily located near major employment centers and transportation systems. Appendix A 8 Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity (Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity) Public Housing,Project-Based Section 8,Cther Mtultifamfiy,and LIHTC locations mapped with racelethnicity dot density map with RIECAPs,distinguishing categories of publicly supported housing by color Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(663792)Jurisidictlon s CBSA • :a ��• �- •• — I ti• • � • GRANTEES y, f ° �'ti'� t • Housing Public H mg Otther Multifamily 0 .• •i R .; l' 4 0 Project-Based Sections ` f+ r ? 0. •r• 'r, �' • 4, `' Lowlncome Housing Tax Credit • W A�,,�4y F d • r ��r , - °;• �' a .P• � bemograph K:s 2010�. ..$a •t , ' a �• • 1 Dot-75 V. , 7,111+ r r • +. - '., White,Non-Hispanic L •- 'V` to • .0 `• �••� 4i F Black,Non-Hispanic •.. ti { a ; *- • ° 4�e ' +�• _ Native American,Non-Hispanic , 4 M _.✓ ..:.. —. � ..;, �W.y, :. .i, lanlPaclic Island � onH spanIc .. _ a•.. • x ~•• j• a�Hispanic r .tr - ♦ a O PC.. '4 ...}, ` • • -•- - r Other Non-Hispanic • + w,� T F'` • • • ! TRACT WECAP' Esn.HERE,DeLomae,NGA,USCS,NPS 4 HUD I united States Census-Bureau Map 5 shows the locations of publicly supportive housing throughout the region. The City has some publicly supported housing units, mostly located in the western central portion of the City. The City also has a number of developments assisted by redevelopment funds. These can be found in Appendix J. Appendix A 9 Map 6 — Housing Choice Vouchers and Race/Ethnicity Temeculi + M • • Name:Map 6-Housing Choice Vouchers • a 1r rc.elo and RacNEthnicity May lr Wo f',�. \ ••� ' •S * t -�� - .,, � � Description:Housing Choice Voucher map with •y". _ k racelethnicity dot density map and • RIE.CAPs • ,a + Jurisdiction:Temecula(CDBG) <�° :� ti •j " .• ° • • Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario., f •t ♦ ~• CA .r .'`..' • • Legend TOC Dot Value:l dot= 75 • • ''`' • Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 .• ` •. 4 icy •`r r ; White;Non-Hispanic • • • ~, ••1• •• , , ••__ ,'Sn 3 •• ; �ti Black.Non-Hispanic Native American,Non-Hispanic • • •t.�{� ` ■*1 • •�� `-,AsianlPaciTic Islander.Non-Hispanic • • a♦•. . P¢!Hispanic Other,Non-Hispanic ° • .•.s.i �• TRACT 1 • y• ti 6 '° +•• " 't RPECAP • RIL'P I'.i.iP Map 6 demonstrates that there are no racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty(R/ECAPs) in the City. Appendix A 10 Map 6 - Housing Choice Vouchers and Race/Ethnicity (Housing Choice Vouchers and Race/Ethnicity) Housing Choice Voucher map with racefethnicity dot density map and RIECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,GA Region;Temecula,GA(063712)Jurisidiction tier CBSA + ( " ' - •s GRANTEES Demographics 2010 � r !w r White,Non-Hispanic it # -' 3 r +a •,y�� „ • T3• Black,Non-Hispanic •• � Native American,Non-Hispanic r�,,,-i�•4 y'}. �,.. "SF`ti'�`� N! - Ssi ? 4 • •t i' Asian)Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic =' .. }u�!' k4 • „•� .. '�Hispanic ". r y •* • :. Other.Non-Hispanic _ - e'� i- _ J£ r '�_` '• TRACT �• • • i Ir }�� •�}�¢' �•�� ` •.F` 1 x 4- RIECAP it a f J. Percent Voucher Units _. ; - ,_. .�.•. rl. . _. 0%-5.99% r'€I • t 3' *:..1 � • r''SS . tet• 5.0%-11.70% '4 t 4, �., `'�'r4•� .. .� m _ .• ti• •«:r'; •` ' 11.71%-20.38% •! ,,s.-- .. .• • • '20.39%-38.28% y!} ",�T' - _ r•-N M' '38.29%-100% Y � ••� JAI 1 % • _ •. •` l. • ' Esd.HERE_DeLwriae_WGA;USGS,NPS United States Census Bureau Map 6 shows that there are few concentrations of housing choice vouchers in the region, mostly in the northern part of the region. Temecula has some housing choice vouchers located in the western central portions of the City. Appendix A 11 Map 7 - Housing Burden and Race/Ethnicity (Housing Burden and Race/Ethnicity) Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with RIECAPs and racelethirl dot density Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction • GRANTEES Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 • White.Non-Hispanic PQ Black,Non-Hispanic • ? Native American,Non-Hispanic • M1.v hw +s7 Asian)Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic • Hispanic Other,Non-Hispanic RJECAP 1 6 Percent Households with Burden ` 01.07% • _ ®25.08%-35.86% • `35.87%-46 28% • `45.39%-59.74% i ■59.75%-100% Cit of Riverside,Coun of Riverside,Sarl Esri,HERE DeLomie,NGA,I1SGS Map 7 shows geographic patterns of racial and ethnic concentrations in 2010. The shading indicates where households are experiencing one or more housing burdens. The darker the shading, the greater the prevalence of homes experiencing cost burdens. Cost burden means that rent plus utility costs exceed 30% of the resident's monthly income. The area with the greatest burden is located in the Temecula Elementary School neighborhood where there is a high concentration of market-rate apartments. This would indicate the need for additional affordable rental housing. The older established single-family neighborhoods in the City have the least cost burden. Appendix A 12 Map 7 - Housing Burden and Race/Ethnicity (Housing Burden and Race/Ethnicity) Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with RIECAPs and racelethnicity dot density Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisldlction 41;{11 ' CBSA -- GRANTEES r P Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 WVhite.Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic t r, r. �� — ��•� S�1 Native American,Non-Hispanic •} ti: ,•4+ . ��AsianlPacifc Islander Non-Hispanic r � _ F Hispanic ,TI Other.Non-Hispanic -•i, RIECAP rill i 1_ . Percent Households with Burden 0%-26.07% ;. _ 26.08%-35.86% ill fY.�• '. �' 7: •• ` • 35.97% 45.33% - hill 46.39%-5974% • .. 59.75%-100% Fsri Map 7 shows areas with housing burden, something that Temecula shares with most of the region and all of Southern California. The darker the shading, the greater the percentage of households experiencing housing cost burdens. Appendix A 13 Map 8 - Housing Burden and National Origin (Housing Burden and National Origin) Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and national origin dot density Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisidic#ian GRANTEES National Origin(Top 5 in Descending.Orders 1 Dot-75 People XMexico RIF Philippines Yf•P.' Korea EI Salvador _e`Gy India RIECAP Percent Households with Burden 0%-26.07% ' 26.08%-35.86% `35.87%-46.38% • `46.39%-59.74% 59.75%-100% Cit of Riverside,County of Riverside,SanGIS.Esri,FERE.DeLorme,NGA.USGS Map 8 shows geographic patterns of national origin concentrations in 2010. The shading indicates where households are experiencing one or more housing burdens. The darker shading represents a greater prevalence of housing units with cost burdens. Cost burden means that rent plus utility costs exceed 30% of the resident's monthly income. While the greatest concentrations of households with housing costs burdens are located in two areas of the City, there is not a concentration in those areas of persons based on national origin. Appendix A 14 Map 8 - Housing Burden and National Origin (Housing Burden and National Origin) Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with RIECAPs and national origin dot density Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,OA(063712)Jurisidlction CBSA GRANTEES National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Orderk 1 Dot-75 People Mexico Philippines • Korea gni r ;EI Salvador e �+x 8India R)ECfAP Percent Households with Burden 096-26.07% 26.08%-35.86% • S` '35.87%-46.38% •�5 1'r `46.39°ia-59.74% ,. `59.75%-100% Esri_HERE DeLorme.NGA,USES,NPS i United States Census Bureau Map 8 shows housing cost burden by national origin. The City does not have any concentrations of immigrants; they are spread throughout the City. The regions to the north and east do have concentrations and many immigrants are experiencing higher than average cost burdens in the region. The housing burdens are felt equally by all racial and ethnic groups in Temecula. Appendix A 15 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and Race/Ethnicity) School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national origin,fatuity status,and PIECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES • `- _ Qe mograPhics 201fl 1 Dot=75 • • White,Non-Hispanic • - L Black,Non-Hispanic • _ • - 4;�Native American,Non-Hispanic 1rt4 AsianlPacific Islander,Non-Hispanic • ;�Hispanic • �Other,Non-Hispanic RIECAP • - school Proficiency Index 0-10 10.1-20 201-30 • '30.1-40 • 40.1-50 • - '50.1-60 601-70 '70.1-80 80.1-90 • '90.1-100 i:iue_cannily of Riverside.SanGIS,Esri,HERE,D.L.rm e,NGA,US GS There are three versions for Map 9 for school proficiency. This first map shows geographic patterns school proficiency with an overlay of racial and ethnic concentrations in 2010. The shading indicates the performance of 4th graders on State exams in 2012. The darker the shadowing, the higher the performance. The area with the lowest school proficiency is in an area with a large number of apartments. The area with the lowest school proficiency in the northwest is sparsely populated and is comprised of mostly industrial uses. There is no significant concentration of racial/ethnic groups in the low performing tracts. Appendix A 16 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and Race/Ethnicity) School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racefethnicity,national origin,family status,and RJECAPs Riverside-San Bern ardino-7ntario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(463712)Juris diction CBSA :..*,,0 GRANTEES Ems* r; rr�y ,•,� , -ti �_. a .x: - R,.-, r � • - �.L :. •,,�i - Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 a t .7e White,Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic t ^ , • f 4� Native American,Non-Hispanic 1 AsianfPacific Islander.Non-Hispanic ' a C7ASS. _ + • Y aYti.. Hispanic $' .'•y,• ,: _ err•'Other,Non-Hispanic �� rs ab_ �e .f -C ryrA � r •R • - ' •��, to •• FUECAP School Proficiency Index 0-10 4.: s -�•?ti ",' `N , - - i _ L 10.1-20 hill 20.1-30 v st • P � ._ I d• '30.1-40 . r.• '�� ,� _ -, _ '401-50 -f,•- • , �{ `50.1-50 {p ` - •f`•. th ••' `60.1-70 s `70.1-80 • `._.;� �•, - `80.1-90 Esri.HERE:UeLorme•NGA.USGS:NPS I United States fensus Bureau ^ `901-100 This version of Map 9 is difficult to analyze the detail because of the breadth of the region; however, the following map with national origin provides more detailed data in comparing school proficiency in Temecula. Appendix A 17 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and National Origin) Schoel Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity,national origin,family status,and RfECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisidicticn GRANTEES ❑ National Origin(Top Sin Descending Order} 1 Dot-75 People , i Mexico �Philippines Korea EI Salvador India RIECAP School Proficiency Index 0-10 10.1-20 ®20.1-30 ' 30.1-40 '40.1-50 ' 50.1-60 60.1-70 `70.1-80 '80.1-90 '90.f-100 City of Riverside.County of Riverside,SanG15.Esd.HERE.DeLorme.NGA.USGS This version of Map 9 shows geographic patterns school proficiency with an overlay of national origin concentrations in Temecula in 2010. The shading indicates the performance of 4th graders on State exams in 2012. The darker colors indicate higher performance on exams. There is no significant concentration of a particular group in the lower performing schools. Appendix A 18 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and National Origin) School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national ongni,family status,and RIECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisid ction e CBSA GRANTEES National Origin(Tops in Descending Order} Dot=75 People Mexico Philippines Korea EI Salvador M India RIECAP School Proficiency Index • 0-10 �r�, r y- 10.1-20 y ap . + ®20.1-30 71 '70.1-40 eWill 40.1-50 tel ` 60.1-70 701-80 ' 90.1-90 i 90.9-100 • Esri,HERE,DeLorme,NGA.USGS.NPS United States Census Bureau This version of Map 9 for National Origin data demonstrates that school proficiency is much higher in the City than in most of the region. As indicated in the narrative, all racial and ethnic groups benefit from the good schools in the City. Appendix A 19 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and Family Status) School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region wlh racefethnicity,national origin,family status,and RJECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES %of Households thatare Families wlh Children • 0%-20%5 O 20.1%-40% 40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% $0.1%-100% RJECAP O - ❑ School Proficiency Index 0-10 10.1-20 ®20.1-30 '70.1-d0 ' 40.1-50 50.1-60 i 60.1-70 '70.1-80 i 80.1-90 `80.1-100 Cit of Riverside, —111y of Riverside,SanGIS,Esn,HERE,Dei.orme,NGA,U.— This version of Map 9 displays where households with children are located within the City. The shading indicates the performance of 4th graders on State exams in 2012. The darker shading represents higher performance. While there are families living in the low proficiency areas, there is not a high concentration of families living there. The City's scores on standardized tests are substantially better than the region as a whole and almost all schools perform better than the national average. Appendix A 20 Map 9 - Demographics and School Proficiency (School Proficiency and Family Status) School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national origin,family status,and PJECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction e casA • o - • GRANTEES • - %01 Households that are Families with Children i • 201%-40% • s01%-00% L 80.1%-100% Y RECAP i0 � School Proficiency Index i e-10 • . 10.1-20 I _ ., �_.; • ® 201-30 D • `30.1-40 • i 401-50 `50.1-60 `60.1-70 • O • • `70.1-00 -� O . i 00.1-90 • '90.1-100 Esd.HERE.DeLomle.NGA.USGS.NPS I United States Census Bureau Because of the scale of Map 9,regional details are difficult to analyze without referring to the previous map. Coupled with other maps and tables in the Assessment of Fair Housing, families in Temecula have access to higher proficiency schools than much of the region. Appendix A 21 Map 10- Demographics and Job Proximity (Job Proximity and Race/Ethnicity) Jobs Proxii Index for JurisoUion and Region with racelethn€cfty,national crig in,family status and RIECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES E—Kraphics 2010 m 1 Dot=75 �r• �White,Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic i,Nativa American,Non-Hispanic ti1.4 Asian/Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic $t1 Hispanic Other,Non-Hispanic • M RIECAP •• Jobs Proximity Index 101-20 ` 201-30 ` 301-40 ` 401-50 , • '50.1-60 .• '60.1-70 ' .. 'S• • '70.1-80 '80.1-90 '90.1-100 Cit of Riverside. County of Riverside.SanGIS.Esri,HERE,DeLorme.NGA.l}SGS There are two versions for Map 10 for job proximity. The map above demonstrates a geographic overlay of racial and ethnic concentrations in 2010, coupled with an index for the distance residents have between home and work. In this case, the darker shading represents better access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. There are no patterns of raciaVethnic concentrations with respect to job proximity in Temecula. The disadvantaged areas have the greatest proximity to jobs. The rest of the community has variable patterns in access, with the corridors along I-15, west of I-15, and commercial arteries along Temecula Parkway having the greatest proximity to jobs. The lower density residential areas have the least proximity to jobs, which may indicate a higher concentration of commuters. Appendix A 22 Map 10 - Demographics and Job Proximity (Job Proximity and Race/Ethnicity) Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national o€igin,family status and RIECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(663712)Jurisidiction CBSA ' t +�-•E• 1`•s' GRANTEES CemograPhics 2014 '8r rt 1 Dot=75 r s ;`; ,.r:.' `" ;45 White,Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic F- Native American.,Non-Hispanic r • w -. ` }4 r >� i, r�r, ,f_'`r • rte•AsianlPacifc Islander,Non-Hispanic •_.': -T. t•iR7� d Hispanic 4 'j 'r's r •4=,, { - �[]cher,Non-Hispanic RJECAP qjr •_ i ~3. •* r° :.1 _ - Jabs Proximity Index 0-10 "A •r. - ' • to • • • �``L.' 10.1-20 �, y " • - ii'20.1-30 * k'T� } a ° 4• . ' 30.1-40 I - {� • '40.1-50 Sal-so -70 '70.1-s0 ` q,w 4.r• t` ' '80.1 80 �'} - • Esri,HERE,HeLorme,NGA,USGS,NPS I United States Census Bureau 91 -100 The scale of the map above displays the enormous land area of the Riverside-San Bernardino MSA, while also demonstrating an overlay of racial and ethnic groups over a measurement of job proximity. There is wide variation in this factor throughout the region. The darker shading represents access to closer job opportunities. Generally the City's diverse neighborhood scores are representative of the region. More detail can be found in the following map. Appendix A 23 Map 10 - Demographics and Job Proximity (Joh Proximity and National Origin) Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racerethnicity.national origin.family status and i Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES • National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Order) 1 Dot=75 People Mexico APhilippines 0Korea EI Salvador 07 v' India • Jobs Proximity Index ' 0-10 10.1-20 20.1-30 ` 30.1-40 40.1-50 i 'so.1-60 • '60.1-70 ' 70.1-80 r1 ' 80.1-90 ■90.1-100 ci of Riverside.Caont of Riverside.sanGIS.Esri.FERE.Del-orme.i 41sGs This version of Map 10 shows geographic patterns based on the top 5 national origin concentrations in Temecula in 2010 and provides an index for physical distances between home and work. In this case, the darker shading represents better the access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. There are no concentrations based on national origin in Temecula. Access is equal for all groups. Appendix A 24 Map 10 - Demographics and Job Proximity (Job Proximity and National Origin) Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnrcity,national erkgin,family status and RlECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Judsld ction CBSA GRANTEES , National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Order) Dot=75 People ". .� - . .. �! Mexico lam`,. Philippines M1 �M2 Korea �. � ,.d, EI SaVatlor • M, i^ r'� i.•India i R ECAP _ Jobs Praxinnily Index 0-10 a •�. .4 `10.1-20 hil l 20.1-30 • '30.1-40 •' � _. _ 'i ii'40.1-50 •�• --_ 50.1-60 '60.1-70 '70.1-80 ._ $ •,_�+f"' '80.1-90 -'•� `90.1-100 United Statas Census Bureau I Esn,HERE.DoLonrl NGA,USES,NPS This regional version of Map 10 shows that much greater job proximity within the population centers to the north where there are extensive industrial complexes, and in the desert communities in the east, where many residents are retired or working in agriculture. Appendix A 25 Map 10 - Demographics and Joh Proximity (Job Proximity and Family Status) Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region oth race?ethnicity,national origin.family status and RiECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES %of Households that are Families with Children • 0%-20% 20.1%-40% 40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% .80.1%-100% Ril i ❑ Jobs Proximity Index 0-10 ! 10.1-20 20.1-30 '30.1-40 '40.1-50 50.1-60 ® `60.1-70 • '70.1-80 . '80.1-90 • '90.1-100 Cf.ty of Riverside,CDuntV of Riverside,SanGIS,Esn,HERE,DaLorme,NGA,USG5 This version of Map 10 displays the geographic patterns based an overlay of families with children in 2010 with an indicator of the physical distances between home and work for households with children. In the case the darker shading represents better the access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. Families are scattered throughout the City and not necessarily concentrated in areas with close proximity to jobs. Appendix A 26 Map 10 - Demographics and Job Proximity (Job Proximity and Family Status) Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racefethnicity.national origin,family status and PJECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidlction CBSA • GRANTEES • • %of Households that are Families with Children • • 0%-20% • 20.1%-40% . 40.1%-60% • • `60..1%-80% • • so %-l00% • • RIECAP • • • .lobs Proximity Index 0 10 • u 10.1-20 • _ • 20.1-30 • '30.1-40 40.1-50 50.1-60 r� `60.1-70 • 70.1-80 `80.1-90 '90.1-100 • pori HFRF 171.1 nano NCI& H_gC_R NPS I llo itaa Rwa Cane nc R,ra v This version of Map 10 shows the relationship of families with job proximity in the region. Because of the scale of the map, patterns are difficult to identify, however Temecula does have a high concentration of households with children. Appendix A 27 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and Race/Ethnicity) Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity,national origin,family status and RlECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisidiction .. _ GRANTEES Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 ` 6�A White.Non-Hispanic �''[[ Black,Non-Hispanic • � �Native American,Non-Hispanic AsianlPacific Islander Non-Hispanic • '�+�'Hispanic • w Other Non-Hispanic + 'ij RIECAP ` • Labor Market Index .. 0-10 • L 10.1-20 • i 20.1-30 • ' 30.1-40 ` • e • k111140.1-50 • `•. .. � ' 50.7-80 • e ` 50.1-70 • • y ` 70.1-80 • ' 80.1-90 ` s ` 90.1-100 C' of Reverstde,Cou of Riverside.SanG15.Esri.HERE.DeLorme.NG,4,t1SG5 _ There are three versions for Map 11 for labor market. The map above shows geographic patterns of racial and ethnic concentrations in 2010 and provides an index on unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. The darker shading represents greater labor engagement. Higher income areas have the greatest job readiness in the City. The lowest labor market index is in the southern portion of the City near the Pechanga Resort and Casino. However, since 2010, several campuses have opened in Temecula including Cal State San Marcos at Temecula, University of Redlands, Concordia University, and Mount San Jacinto. More recent data would likely show an improvement in job readiness of the labor market. There is no significant concentration of racial/ethnic groups in the City, based on labor market readiness. Appendix A 28 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and Race/Ethnicity) Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity,national origin,family status and RIECAPs Riverside-'San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(663712)Jurisidiction - •' .. '- CBSA GRANTEES f ❑ r ;'r',. •'•� DemoOraPh"2010 4tti=' •, r-�: ..dY I �r� .. _ 1 Dot=75 •_ - } e e White, on-Hispanic a "` • °ty1-w - rF Black,Non-Hispanic ., r� � ��a-'r �, • « Native American,Non-Hispanic ..�•. .� �`e' "ti Y ' •3 ' e • ••., '�,. • ,',y AsiantPacific Islander,Non-Hispanic ,:..°! Hispanic other Non-Hispanic r r - e • — e• �,g��, RIECAP Labor Market Index. 0-10 10.1-20 ' ,r • • 20.1-30 rR:'. .r .vt•w S '30.1-40 •A -:.d y•• `40.1-50 e ~ m •t• •�-••— '�.I, t '50.1-50 60.1-70 • `70.1-80 4111 11101116 • i .L '._ _ ..... •..,.... ..... ..,. ., 80.1-90 Map 11 shows that much of the region is lacking in labor engagement. Although some classes are available locally, the lack of community college in Temecula in 2010 is probably part of the reason for this deficiency. However, since 2010, several campuses have opened in Temecula including Cal State San Marcos at Temecula, University of Redlands, Concordia University, and Mount San Jacinto. More recent data would likely show an improvement in job readiness of the labor market. Other areas have notably higher ratings such in the vicinity of UC Riverside, Cal State San Bernardino and Redlands College in the north and in Orange County to the west. Appendix A 29 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and National Origin) Labor Engagement Index with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RfECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES L) National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Orderl • 1 Dot=75 People Mexico • Philippines Korea • EI Salvador C India • RIECAP Labor Market Index 0-10 L 10.1-20 '20.1-30 `30.1-40 `40.1-50 • `50.1-50 • `60.1-70 _ 70.1-80 ' 80 1-90 '90.1-100 y City of Riverside.Count-of Riverside,SanGIS.Esri.HERE.DeLorme,NGA,IDSGS This version shows geographic patterns based on national origin in 2010 and measures unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. The darker the shading represents greater labor market engagement. All groups have relatively equal labor engagement opportunities. Appendix A 30 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and National Origin) Labor Engagement Index with racelethr icity,nat€onat origin,farrI status and RIECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(663712)Jurisidiction -- CRSA + GRANTEES 211 r� National OriginlTop 5 in Descending Order) t= 1Do75 People Mexico r- Philippines Korea r �., EI Salvador India -' 'r LLLJJJ - `" 1 ya '� RIECAP ` a Labor Market Index 0-10 S—. u 10.1-20 4ti 3 '20.1-30 `30.1-40 401-50 • `50.1-80 -_ - `80.1-70 i� '70.1-80 kh 001-90 J y' '90.9-100 Esd,HERE,DeiLorme,I USGS.NPS I United States Census Bureau This version of Map 11 shows the low labor force readiness throughout the region in 2010. The Temecula area has better scores than the region, but lags behind Orange County to the west. It is important to consider the number of local college campuses that have added Temecula locations in the past several years. It is important to note that a mountain range separates Orange County from Temecula. Appendix A 31 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and Family Status) Labor Engagement Index with racelethniciTy,national origin,family status and PUECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES + r • %of Househaltls that are Families with Children r • • 0%-20% r • 20.1%-40% r 40.1%-60% . 60.1%-80% ® r 80.1%-100% r � Q RIECAP r D O ❑ ® ® 0 Lahor Market Index 0 0-10 r 10.1-20 ® ®20.1-30 0 i 30.1-40 r '40.1-50 .501-60 60.1-70 r r `70.1-80 N r i '80.1-90 90.1-100 � r City of Riverside,County of Revelside,SanGIS,Esrrt,HERE,DeLonne,I USES This version shows geographic patterns based households with families in 2010 and provides and index regarding unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. The darker the shading represents greater labor market engagement. Families are spread throughout the City, although there is a concentration of families in areas with greater labor market engagement. The area with the lowest labor market index had the least concentration of families. Appendix A 32 Map 11 - Demographics and Labor Market (Labor Market and Family Status) Labor Engagement Index with race.lethnicity,national origin,family status and RIECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,OA Region;Temecula,OA(063712)Jurisidiction • • CBSA • • • GRANTEES • ••• • %of Households that are Families with Children - - • • • • 0%-20% • • • _ • 20.1%-40% • 40.1%-60% • • • • • • • • • . 60.1%-80% *,_ •50.1%-100% h S • RIECAP • • • • • • Labor Market Index 0-10 • • -• • • - 10.1-20 • -.• • . _ L 20.1-30 • • • 1 • • '30.9-40 • • • • ti • `40.1-50 `50.1-60 • • •. • `60.1-70 • • •` `70.9-80 • • .� , • - '80.1-90 • • `90.1-100 Esn.HERE.13eLorme.NGA..USGS.NIPS.G United States Census Bureau _ This version of Map 11 shows familial status in relationship with the labor market in the region. The map clearly demonstrates the familial centric area of the Temecula Valley. More detailed data for Temecula can be found in the previous versions of Map 11.. Appendix A 33 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and Race/Ethnicity) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethn€city,national origin,tardy status and RIECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisdiction • • GRANTEES • Demographics 2010 Dot=75 • •• - White,Non-Hispanic • ;;k P Black.Non-Hispanic Native American,Non-Hispanic • " AsianlPacific Islander,Non-Hispanic • L Hispanic Other,Non-Hispanic • ` x RIECAP " - TransRTrips Index 0-10 10.1-20 " `201-30 • '30.1-40 y i ,i •� !, 40.1-50 i 50.1-60 60.1-70 701-80 `90.1-100 - (,it.of Riverside,Cnun of Riverside,SanGIS,Esri,HERE,UeLorme,NGA,USGS There are three versions to Map 12, which provides and index on the number of transit trips a neighborhood uses public transportation, with an overlay of the top five race and ethnicity groups in the City. The darker the shading, the greater the transportation access at the neighborhood level. There is one area in the north that has a low use of public transportation. This is Census Tract 432.17. It is not an eligible CDBG area, because its median income is too high. (See map of CDBG-eligible areas in Appendix G.) It is also an area, as shown in Map 11, with a higher than average market engagement. This would indicate that there is not a great of a need for public transportation in that particular area. Racial/ethnicity is not a factor since they are spread evenly throughout the City. Appendix A 34 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and Race/Ethnicity) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RIECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(003712)Jurlsidlction . •. .. i" cBSA H `` • . "'M `., • • fes.r.• •"• o " s * ❑ d ��,, T p,,�} .-.• _1y • GRANTEES e op .'i4 rr -" -'rT�,.�iL��PPY'AAr;�. z. �'"15.1�,'y_ y'• ,. . , z_ i 1 4' d.a - • 1p',,. Demographics 2010 { i• _ t 4�r f tit r Y 1 Dot=75 �, _€ • P, 4a1' 5e3riC, �:. r White,Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic •�q, 3,y��t r.-v J ,� _ �¢L; ., �+Native American,Non-Hispanic + ''!��_ ��&*Z t r+� ��'['�-}w }�,,Y�j •y � AsianlPacificlslantler,Non-Hispanic S v,3* 1 � .. •.�kIS!'x •• r— 4•,. „ �,: Hispanic �{+� ,1 p,e "• , • ,• r Other,Non-Hispanic }� RIECAP Transit Trips Index 0-10 10.1-20 qS.. S� • 20.1-30 .° •. ",. '30.1-40 • .. •"- } '40.1-50 • f '50.1-60 •7 i•• '60.1-70 .. •. - .70.1-80 • • - '80.1-90 �t4�_etw • '_ Esri.HERE,DeLorme N(-,A,USGS.NPS i United States Census Bureau \SO I-ion Map 12 shows that access to public transportation is a challenge to the scattered population centers in this large region. Compare this map with the following version of the same map. Appendix A 35 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and National Origin) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with raceiethnicRy,national origin,family status and RIECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction _ GRANTEES • National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Order) 1 Dot=75 People + �McHieo [,cx t: Philippines .• '">N Korea -?yam EI Salvador 1W • Bx�India RIECAP Transit Trips Index + 0-10 10.1-20 ' 20.1-30 '30.1-40 `40.1-50 • '50.1-60 + '60.1-70 y 70.1-80 e `80.1-90 ' 90.1-100 AL City of Riverside.County of Riverside,San G15,Esri,HERE,neLaNNGAIIISGS This version of Map 12 provides an index on the number of transit trips in a particular neighborhood, with an overlay of residents by national origin. The darker shading represents a greater public transportation usage at the neighborhood level. There is one area in the northern portion of the City with a low transportation index; however, there are few immigrants in that particular census tract. There are no concentrations of groups that have significantly lower access to public transportation than other groups. Appendix A 36 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and National Origin) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicty,national origin,family status and RIECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidictlon Cl ` r— GRANTEES LJ _ Nation l Origin{Top 5 in Bosco nding Order} t �-A 1 Dot=75 People .' –• ._ Mexico ' Philippines 'Korea EI Salvador • . • • y r r'�,:..�_ t' India - Transit Trips Index F� 0-10 _. .. '. 101-20 `20.1-30 `30.1-40 '40.1-50 ;•`•. `50.1-60 ` 601-70 '70.1-80 '80.1-90 `90.7-900 L1niled.Slales..GE[t5us.Bureau f Esri.HERE.UeLomie.NCA-USES.NPS This regional version of Map 12 demonstrates the challenges of providing public transportation. Temecula's access to public transportation is above average in the region; however, it is still a local challenge that can be improved upon. Appendix A 37 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and Family Status) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RrECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction • GRANTEES Hi '� • %of Households thatare Families with Children ® i 0%-20% • 20.1%-40% . 40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% • • •80.1%-106% • RIECAP • i ! Transi ips Index 0-10 i i�10.3-20 20.1-30 30.1-40 '40.1-50 i `50.1-60 i `60.1-70 `70.1-80 ® 80.1-90 i 90.1-100 Ci of Riveside.Cou of Riverside,SanGli Esri.HERE,DeLa¢aae.i USES _ This version of Map 12,demonstrates how often families with children in a particular census tract use public transportation. The darker shading indicates greater usage at the neighborhood level. In the lightly shaded census tract in the northern portion of the City, there are fewer families that reside in that area. Appendix A 38 Map 12 - Demographics and Transit Trips (Transit Trips and Family Status) Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with racelethnlcity,national origin,family status and RfECAFs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region:Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction CBSAi • ' • • GRANTEES 77 • f i • + • %of Households that are Families with Children • • • �` �; • 0%-20% • • • • • 40.1%-50% • • • • • • • • • • • 601%-30% • • •' # �301%-106% • • RIECAP • • • i Trans it Trips Index • .• 0-10 • • • • • • . • . u 10.1-20 ir• • • • : • • • '20.1-30 I i • �36,-40 • • • • • • . •�• % • '40.1-50 •� • • • `50.1-60 • 41 • i J `60.1-70 • . . kh 70.,-80 • • • IIk 90.9-90 • • '90.1-100 Esri,HERE,UeLonne,NGA,USGS,NPS I United States Census Bureau This version of Map 12 provided by HUD shows regional that there are high concentrations of families with children in the regional population centers. Appendix A 39 Map 13 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost (Low Transportation Cost and Race/Ethnicity) Low Transportation Cost Index with racelethrinty,national crigln,family status and RIECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisidiction 1 • GRANTEES • « " Demographics 2010 • , , y - 1 Dot=75 "`•` WSJ;White,Non-Hispanic • • • " l33 Black.Non-Hispanic "•� • ,-`" Native American,Non-Hispanic r_ •,•" ,i' I AsiarRacitc Islander,Nor-Hispanic ea Hispanic '• t',Other;Non-Hispanic • + RiECAP " Low Tra ns portation Cost Index '•••• • i•• •. •` .. •. 101-20 201-30 `30.1-40 .a • • '40.1-50 « • • •. • « •• `50.1-60 • 'r. • --------------- `50.1-70 •. .•. `70.1-80 • f '00.1-90 • `90.1-100 • • City of Riverside,County of Riverside,SanGIS,Esri,HERE,DeLorme,NGA,HSGS f _ There are three versions to Map 13, which provides an index on the cost of transportation by census tract. The darker shading represents lower cost of transportation at the neighborhood level. The lower income census tracts have lower transportation costs due to usage of public transportation. All races and ethnicities are equally affected by the cost of transportation. Appendix A 40 Map 13 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost (Low Transportation Cost and National Origin) Low Transportation Cast with racefethr icity,national origin,tar lg status and RCECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES • - Nation l Origin flop 5 in Descending Order} . 1 Dot=75 People • —- - Mexico • • y;p�Philippines � f E Korea EI Salvador Z India • RiECAP • Low Transportation Cost Index 0-10 •, 10.1-20 201-30 30.1-40 '40.1-50 • `50.1-60 `60.1-70 ---- `70.1-80 ` 80.1-90 `90.1-100 City of Riverside,County of Riverside,SanGIS,Esri,HERE,®el-orni NCA,USGS This version of Map 13 measures cost of transportation by neighborhood by national origin. The darker shading represents lower cost of transportation at the neighborhood level. The lower income census tracts have lower transportation costs due to usage of public transportation. Racial and ethnic groups are spread evenly throughout the City, but the map above shows that most have lower than average costs for transportation. Appendix A 41 Map 13 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost (Low Transportation Cost and National Origin) Low Transportation Cast wfth racelethnlctty,national origin,family status and RfECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region-,Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction r - CB5A GRANTEES I- National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Order) 1 Dot=75 People Philippines . -.._.. - , Korea • {i• �` ,,J�''�'' ��EI Salvador India l5 • c [,,I �'a� r�' •, v♦ R;LCAP •. Low Transportation Cost Index ,. • 0-10 . 10.1-20 • _ `20.1-30 JL • - `30.1-40 `40.1-50 M•. `50.1-60 • '60.1-70 - '70.1-90 '•i '. .., `80.1-90 ` 90.1-100 _ Esri,DERE.DeL9rme.WGA.USGS.NPS I United-States Cansus Bureau. This version of Map 13 shows more clearly that transportation costs are lower along freeway arteries in the northern portion of the region and in Temecula. However, it is still a major challenge to provide low cost transportation in the entire region. Appendix A 42 Map 13 - Demographics and Low Transportation {Cost (Low Transportation Cost and f=amily Status) Low Transportation Cost Index with racelethnicity,nat€onaiJ origin,family status and RlECAPs Temecula;CA(06371 2)Jurisidiction GRANTEES • • • %of Households thatare Families with Children • 0%-20% • 26.1%-40% • 40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% r .80.1%-100% • + * . R1E.CAP • Low Transportation Cost Index • 0-10 •� 10.1-20 • 20.1-30 . • `30.1-40 40.1-50 • - `50.1-60 • • '60.1-70 `70.1-80 . • • --- i 80.1-90 i 90.1-100 • Cliy of Riverside,Comity of Riverside,SariGIS,Esri,HERE,DeLorme,NGA,USGS This version of Map 13 provides an index for the cost of transportation and proximity to public transportation by neighborhood by families with children. The darker shading represents lower cost of transportation at the neighborhood level. Families are spread throughout the City, but areas with the highest cost for transportation tend to have fewer families. Appendix A 43 Map 13 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost (Low Transportation Cost and Family Status) Low Transportation Cost Index with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RrECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction + ! • • ' fAD• • •OL Sk ! • • Cl 1 ❑ ! • ! • • GRANTEES r • •! • %of Households that are Families with Children • • • • - • 20.1%-40% • • • ' ! 40.1%-60% ! ! ! • • • • • • ! • 60 1%-80% • j •soi%-f00% • ♦ ! • RIECAP ! • +•� •• ! • •� • ' S • Low Transportation Cost Index �• *• • • • • � � � • • • • • 10.7-20 •� ! ! • • `20.1-30 ! l � • • • • `30.1-40 M • ! . • `40.1-50 •• • ' • • '50.1-60 '60.,-70 • ♦ ♦ • `80.1-90 • ♦ `90.8-100 ♦ Esri,HERE,DeLorme.NGA,USGS.NPS i United States Census Bureau This version of Map 13 demonstrates the households with families and low transportation cost for the entire region. The families with children tend to be clustered around the regional population centers. While Temecula fares better than many other communities in the region for transportation costs, public transportation is a challenge for the entire region. Appendix A 44 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and Race/Ethnicity) Low Poverty Index with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RJECAPS Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES _ Demographics 2010 1 Dot=75 White,Non-Hispanic .T Black,Non-Hispanic Native American,Non-Hispanic ;r Asian/Pacific lslantler,Non-Hispanic • Hispanic + • � •;Other,Non-Hispanic RIECAP ❑ Low Poverty Index 0-10 10.1-20 U 20.1-30 ., ` 70.1-40 • •° r • '40.1-50 ` 50.1-60 . ` 60.1-70 • ° '70.1-80 ' 80.1-90 h,90.1-100 Ci of Riverside.Coun of Riverside_SanGIS_Esri_HERE.neLorme_NGA_LfSGS There are three versions of Map 14, which provides an index regarding exposure to poverty by census tract, with an overlay of race and ethnicity. The darker shading represents less exposure to poverty. The factor is based on the number of persons in poverty in a census block group in 2010 based on an ACS data provided by HUD (2006-2010). The north central part of the City has the greatest exposure to poverty. Many commercial shopping centers are located in this census tract, along with a mix of affordable housing units, and market-rate apartments. This census tract also contains Temecula Elementary, the City's only Title I School. When compared to data in Table 12 in the Assessment, Temecula fares better than the national average for exposure to poverty with all race and ethnicities. Appendix A 45 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and Race/Ethnicity) Low Poverty Index with racelethniicity,national origin,family status and R{ECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisldlctlon s. :fi • �j .. t CBSA i ! GRANTEES Qemogra ph"2010 r �`� � _r 'vg _ - ' _._. R��White Nan Hispanic '•F`^`' f s� sem' G .,. - Black,Non-Hispanic Native American,Non-Hispanic r�Y ��-�}• of ��; x '• �• • �*�� AeianlPaciScIslander,Non-Hispanic '�- ..f,ti ..• iT4nrr •. �A* Hispanic f' r -'� y .•"� ...��,."`�•�. +fir �f�Other,Non-Hispanic • ," - - - *. Low Poverty Index F 4 '• Y �• ' 0-10 101-20 f.'. ! r r . f ✓- �• y. R �.t•`. '.., `20.1-30 hill 30.1-40 • x`s . ....y.;t, r hill 501-60 '60.1-70 '70.1-80 '80.1-90 Fcri HFRF rlo-1 nrmu NC�.A t ISC�C NPS I l Inifcrt Sf atce['.cnaiie Ri ro-a F�3�1 s __. The regional Map 14 provides a low poverty index with an overlay of race and ethnicity. The exposure to poverty varies widely throughout the region, as to be expected with a large area. Appendix A 46 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and National Origin) Low Poverty Index with racelethr icity,national origin,family status and RIEGAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction GRANTEES ❑ National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Orderl 1Dot=75 People Mexico Philippines Korea yy¢. EI Salvador R1 India RIECAP Low Poverty Index 0-10 L 19.1-20 `29.1-30 `30.1-40 i `401-50 -o- '59.1-60 `60.1-70 `70.1-80 `80.1-90 i 90.1-100 Cit of Riverside.County of Riverside_SanGIS_Esn_HERE.I]eLorm e_l DSGS This version of Map 14 measures exposure to poverty by census tract by national origin. The darker shading represents less exposure to poverty. The factor is based on the number of persons in poverty in a census block group in 2010 based on an ACS data provided by HUD (2006-2010). While persons from other nations live in the area with the highest exposure to poverty,populations based on national origin are spread evenly throughout the City. This census tract also contains Temecula Elementary, the City's only Title I School. When compared to data in Table 12 in the Assessment, Temecula fares better than the national average for exposure to poverty with all race and ethnicities. Appendix A 47 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and National Origin) Low Poverty Index with racefethnil national origin,family status and PJECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidict on CnSA + ❑ GRANTEES National Origin ITop 5 in Descending Order) 'h 1Dot=75 People Mexico Philippines - • k Korea ,i EI Salvador India RIECAP • 7T .h�*,• Low Poverty Index • �+--�� 0-10 10.1-20 '20.1-30 . 30.1-40 `40.1-50 i 50.1-60 '60.1-70 '70.1-80 `00.1-90 '90.1-100 Esd,HERE,DeLorme,NGA,USGS,NPS I United States Census Bureau ,Y 1 This version of Map 14 demonstrates that the region has large variations in exposure to poverty, as seen in the checkboard pattern. It is greater in the northern portions of the region and the agricultural areas to the east than in Temecula. Appendix A 48 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and Family Status) Low Poverty Index with racelethnicity,national origin.family status and R+'ECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisdiction GRANTEES %of Households thatare Families with Children • 0%-20% 28.1%-40% 40.1%-60% 50.1%-80% 001%-100% 0 '� RIFCAP • Low Poverty Index 0-10 10.1-20 20.1-30 30.1-40 i 401-50 50.1-60 '60.1-70 ' 70.1-80 �^ '80.1-90 ` 90.1-100 JIL Cof Riverside,Coun of Riverside,SanGIS,Esri,HERE.Del NGA,USES + This version of Map 14 provides an index on the exposure to poverty by for families with children, broken down by census tract. The darker the shading represents less exposure to poverty at the neighborhood level. The factor is based on the number of persons in poverty in a census block group in 2010 based on an ACS data provided by HUD (2006-2010). There is not a concentration of families in the census tracts with the greatest exposure to poverty in the City. Appendix A 49 Map 14 - Demographics and Poverty (Poverty and Family Status) Low Poverty Index with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RlECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction CBSA r,. GRANTEES %of House holds that are Families with Children • ++i • • � � 20.7%-40% i 40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% 80.1%-100% • - RIECAP + rM i • Low Poverty Index C 0-10 i . ' • u 10.1-20 20.1-30 • II'30.1-40 ' * '40.1-50 F '50.1-60 `50.1-70 hill 70.1-80 - • `80.1-90 `90.7-100 tlntted States Census Bureau I Esri,HERE.neLorme,NGA.USGS.NPS The regional version of Map 14 demonstrations high variation rates in exposure to poverty for families with children throughout the region. As demonstrated by the previous map, there is less variation in exposure to poverty in Temecula than the region as a whole. Appendix A 50 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and RacefEthnicity) Environmental Health Index with racelethnicity,national origin,family status and RrECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidictian ti GRANTEES • , t i LJ i Demographics 20110 � f Dot=75 O ?'• jyi White,Non-Hispanic Black,Non-Hispanic • M Native American,Non-Hispanic "AsianlPacific Islander,Non-Hispanic • �� Hispanic • Pill'. Other,Non-Hispanic • • • - RIECAP - Environmental Health Index • 0-10 • . U 10.1-20 20.1-30 • '` `30.1-40 `40.1-50 50.1-60 '• _ ° `60.1-70 `70.1-80 • `80.1-90 '90.1-100 • City of Riverside,County of Riverside,Sari Esri,HERE,DeLorme,NGA.USGS There are three versions of Map 15, which provides an index on environmental health, based on EPA estimates of air quality, carcinogenic, respiratory, and neurological toxins by census tract, with an overlay of race and ethnicity. The darker shading represents less exposure to air quality issues at the neighborhood level. The areas with the greatest exposure to environmental health concerns are located along the freeway. Temecula's exposure to environmental health issues is lower than the region's average. Appendix A 51 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and Race/Ethnicity) Environmental Health Index with racefethnlc4ty,national origin,tamily status and RIECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontaft CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidlction CRSA •.�i'stS� �•��,�C';Q'�.: GRANTEES r 4 a•.. p ¢ r 7 c Demographics 2018 w 4* 1 Dot 75 L e ; �fi i7J ` qtr t White Non-Hispanic �. r, d 7 Black,Non-Hispanic 4 �. a • Native American,Non-Hispanic AsiaNPacificlslender Non-Hispanic Hispanic s } t Other,Non-Hispanic :i,. ti a..• .. J. RIECAPi - - _ Environmental Health Index 0-10 '0.1-20 20.1-30 30.1-40 h . .. '40.1-50 • _- `50.1-80 " r • Ili 60.1-70 `70.1-80 . 80.1-90 . - _ - Fcn HFRF F1eI nrme NC-..4 IJRCR NPS I t]nited Sraaee Cen_cn_e Bureau Regional Map 15 demonstrates that Temecula has better environmental health than other population centers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, however does not fare as well as the less populous and less dense areas of the region. Appendix A 52 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and National Origin) Environmental Health Index with race ethnicity,national origin,family status and FUECAPs Temecula;CA(063712)Jurisdiction GRANTEES • National Origin(Top 5 In Descending Order) 1 Dot=75 People v� Mexico �"• Philippines • ,p+1•Korea YY�r:vv EI Salvador Mk�E India Will • Environmental Health Irdex 0-10 10.1-20 201-30 '30.1-40 '401-50 • '50.1-60 • `60.1-70 '701-80 '801-90 '90.1-100 ('iw of Rlvers"ade.CounW of Riverside,SanG15,Esri.IiERE,DeLorme.NGA,US GS This version of Map 15 provides an index on environmental health, based on EPA estimates of air quality, carcinogenic, respiratory, and neurological toxins by census tract, with an overlay of households by the top five national origins. The darker shading represents less exposure to air quality and toxicity issues at the neighborhood level. The areas with the highest exposure are closest to the freeway. Appendix A 53 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and National Origin) Environmental Health Index with racelethnicitynational origin_family status and RIECAPS Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction CBSA + L) _ GRANTEES �c - t:~• National Origin(Top 5 in Descending Orr _ 1Dot=75 People Mexico _r • .'Philippines v ^: „ Korea EI Salvador s •,L ::� • ��India RIECAP .�t - Environmental Health Index 0-10 10.1-20 ,r 20.1-30 30.1-40 '40.1-50 ,1w '•• _ `50.1-60 '•, '60.1-70 70.1-80 • '80.1-90 '90.3-100 Esri.HERE.DeLorme.NGA.USGS.NPS I United States Carsus Bureau Regional Map 15, with an overlay of top five national origins, demonstrates that Temecula has better environmental health than other population centers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties,however does not fare as well as the less populous and less dense areas of the region. Appendix A 54 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and Family Status) Environmental Health Index with racelethnicity,national orpn,family status and RlECAPs Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisdiction ® GRANTEES + ® + %of Households that are Families with Children • 0%-20% - 20.1%-40% . 40.1%-60% . , 60.1%-80% 80.1%-100% • • ® WECAP Ll • Environmental Health Index ® 0-10 i 0` ` 10.1-20 '20.1-30 ® ' 30.1-40 `40.1-50 . ` 50.1-60 • i ' 60.1-70 '70.1-80 `80.1-90 '90.1-100 DtV of Riverside,County of Riverside,SanGIS,Esri,HERE,UeLorme,NGA,USGS This version of Map 15 provides an index on environmental health, based on EPA estimates of air quality, carcinogenic, respiratory, and neurological toxins by census tract, with an overlay of households with families. The darker shading represents less exposure to air quality and toxicity issues at the neighborhood level. The areas with the highest exposure are closest to the freeway. Appendix A 55 Map 15 - Demographics and Environmental Health (Environmental Health and Family Status) Environmental Health Index with race/ethnicity,national origin,family status and MECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region,Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction CBSA ❑ • - GRANTEES _ %of Households that are Families wth Children • • 0%-2045 • • • 20.1%-40% • • • • 401%-60% • • • .60.146-80% • • • i$3,%_,00% • RIECAP • • • •� • Environmental Health Index • • • •• • • . .•• •• - 0-10 . • r • `• • . * . 10.1-20 • • * .�• • • _ *. . •• • y 20.1-30 • • • � • '30.1-40 • • 40 �� • • * `401-50 •, . • '501-60 + • '60.1-70 • • 70.1-80 • - `90.1-90 '90.1-,00 This regional version of Regional Map 15, with an overlay of households with children, demonstrates that Temecula has better environmental health than other population centers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties,however does not fare as well as the less populous and less dense areas of the region. Appendix A 56 Map 16 - Disability by Type - Hearing, Vision and Cognitive Disability Map Informabon Pill �s • • ® Temecula RCDBGE Name:Map 16-Disability by Type Variation:Hearing,Vision and Cognitive Nf,_,,r•a, - Disability Description:Dot density map ofthe population • of persons with disabilities by persons with vision,hearing, S. � � cognitive,ambulatory,self-care. _ and independent living difficulties with RfE.CAPs for Jurisdiction and Legend TOC • Dot Value:1 dot= 75 • Disability 1 Dot=75 • ± �,�•Hearing Disability • � Vision Disibility .M . w Cognitive Disability • RiECAP There are two versions of Map 16. This version depicts a dot density distribution by disability type (hearing, vision, cognition). Persons with disabilities are evenly distributed throughout the City. Data was supplied by HUD based on ACS data(2008-2012). Appendix A 57 Map 16 - Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision and Cognitive Disability) Dot density map of the population of persons with disabilities by persons with vision,hearing,cognitive,ambulatory,self-care,and independent living difficulties with R+ECAPs for Jurisdiction and Region Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(463712)Jurisldiction ' CBSA *''.,s,. .• GRANTEES •±•S.r,i' r Ids••; ,•.: - i ••� `' •J. . 'w.5 •�r•r'. w'�.f Disability `�• rr Z• ` r! ' ` • • f,,`s Hearing Disability , ;;_"i�!• ��' .•• .•'jF . • ;k Vision Disibility ' •Cognitive Disability T_ WECAP ' Lh • :j�. •• i� • 'rTMP � -!�•• :� ti`.. .fit+ Esri.HERE;DeLcrme.NGA.USGS.NPS I United States Census Bureau Map 16 shows the locations where persons with hearing, vision and cognitive disabilities live throughout the region. The map demonstrates that they are concentrated in the northern urban areas of Riverside County, Hemet, and in the desert communities. Appendix A 58 Map 16 — Disability by Type — Ambulatory, Self-Care and Independent Living Disability Map Informabon • F Temecula ICDDG} Name:Map 16-Disability by Type • Variation:Ambulatory,Self-Care and • Independent Living Disability • Description:Dot density map ofthe population of persons with disabilities by persons with vision,hearing, cognitive,ambulatory,self care, • and independent living difficulties ' with RIECAPs forJurisdiction and Legend TOC • Dot Value:1 dot= 75 • Disability • 1 Dot-75 Ambulatory Disability � Self-Care Disability 1�y li� ._,Independent Living Disability RICAP IJ This version of Map 16 depicts a dot density distribution by disability type (ambulatory, self-care,independent living). Persons with disabilities are evenly distributed throughout the City. Data was supplied by HUD based on ACS data(2008-2012). Appendix A 59 Map 16 - Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care and Independent Living Disability) Dot density map of the population of persons with disabilities by persons with vision,hearing,cognttnre,amtlulatory,self-care,and independent living diff-rculies with RfECAPs for Jurisdiction and Region Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction • • CBSA . •V" GRANTEES • •h a r •i'��. •' Disability ��{ y�'� •'lai efiS e.t: a P -• 7 Dot 75 47 �' ' � :� ,•t p S'Tf • • Ambulatory Disability Self--Care Disability r ,• =s •9 ,Independent Living Disability • ,,a ;-�'.+ ,`i�•..w�:a JaJt a _L••�f -e, • •• RfECAP L 4 fir: -•�. a �.,�Y'•a:•m:r rte=� :. _i�:r}�'j •.. •« �i3„' , •-, •�' . '. _ _ • • l i f� •MA' 1 r • •'r Esri.HERE.DeLorme.NGA.USGS.NPS I United States Census Bureau. Map 16 shows where persons with ambulatory, self-care and independent living disabilities are located throughout the region. While the City has some residents with disabilities, the greatest concentrations are in the north, closer to County services. Appendix A 60 Map 17 - Disability by Age Group Map Informabon • ® Temecula(CDBG) Name:Map 17-Disability by Age Group Description:All persons with disabilities by age • range(5-17j118-64)165+}with • R.+ECAPs • • Jurisdiction:Temecula(CDBGI • Region:Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. • CA • Legend TOC • Dot Value:I dot= 75 • • Disability • 1 Dot=75 a.4. Disabled Ages 5-17 • '' E Disabled Ages 18-64 • Disabled Over 64 • R)ECAR Map 17 shows the location of people with disabilities by age. Persons with disabilities are evenly distributed throughout the City. Data was supplied by HUD based on ACS data(2008-2012). Appendix A 61 Map 17 - Disability by Age Group (Disability by Age Group) All persons with disabilities by age range(5-17)(18-,64)(65+)with RfECAPs Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA Region;Temecula,CA(063712)Jurisidiction • - �• CBSA • a w•�• GRANTEES -" •p?fxS�+�.ii�' a l: '.�+}7•Cti ' •• •?•' - - Disability 1W 1 Cot=75 1 ••,•• r •'• ~'• �er•�sC: ;` ` t P�,,-�Disabled Ages 5-17 ' r •x '�',• �}Disabled Ages 18-54 y-" �• 7•:x - r • • t.h 1 •• . :'.:'-.��• Disabled Over 54 ';6a•• Lal••'x -•: LC - ,_ `.r ,-: 'e. •• •�t•3'"« ;• RiECAP • r �.- .f,4-:x�•' 4y .- • ''�'' ff.'s•', •'*`. , • • 40- car Y Esri.HERE.DeLorme.NGA.l.1SGS.NPS I United States Census Bureau .� Map 17 shows the ages of those with disabilities from a regional perspective. As common for other persons with disabilities, these persons have located near where County services can be easily accessed. Appendix A 62 APPENDIX B HUD-Provided Tables APPENDIX B HUD-Provided Tables Table Series Title Table I Demographics (2010)....................................................................................I Table 2 Demographic Trends (1990-2010) ...............................................................2 Table 3 Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends (1990-2010) ..........................................3 Table 4 R/ECAPs Demographics...............................................................................4 Table 5 Publicly Supported Housing Units by Program Category.............................5 Table 6 Publicly Supported Housing Residents by Race/Ethnicity............................6 Table 7 RECAP and Non-R/ECAP Demographics by Publicly Supported Housing ProgramCategory.........................................................................................7 Table 8 Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Development by Program Category........................................................................................................8 Table 9 Demographics of Households with Disproportionate Housing Needs..........9 Table 10 Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden..............10 Table I I Publicly Supported Housing by Program Category: Units by Number of Bedrooms and Number of Children............................................................11 Table 12 Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity...................................................12 Table 13 Disability by Type.......................................................................................13 Table 14 Disability by Age Group.............................................................................14 Table 15 Disability by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category....................15 Table 1 provides a comparison in the demographic data for the City with the region including total population, the number and percentage of persons by race/ethnicity, national origin (10 most populous), Limited English Proficiency populations (LEP) (10 most populous), disability by type, sex, age range (under 18, 18-64, 65+), and households with children. The City is diverse in its racial/ethnic composition, national origin, LEP, and persons with disabilities. However, the region as a whole is even more diverse than the City. The region is the largest region in the United States and is home to many immigrant households. Demographic data is based on sample questions from the 2010 Census and may not reflect official data released by the Census Bureau. Tab@e l- (Temecula.CA C08Gf aurMiction (Riverside-San 9ernardina-Ontaria•CA CG SA Re¢ian Race{Ethnicity # is, # o- White,Non-Hispanic 47,973 57..: 1.5-6•EEE 3E.E1 Black,Non-Hispanic 3,265 3.83 341,523 7.14 Hispanic 20,991 24.94 1,396,442 47.25 AslanorParlficlslander,Nun-Hispanic 8,172 9.71 261,593 6.19 NativeAmerican,Non-Hispanir 527 C'.E3 19,454 0.46 Other,Nun-Hispanic 143 - 7,737 0.18 Nlatiorial Origin Ca u ntry C a u ntry #1 cou ntry oforigi n Mexico 4,702 4.68 r,Aexico 553,433 13.10 #2country of'origin Philippines 3,254 3.24 Philippines 62,319 1.=- #3 rou ntry oforigi n Korea 658 0.65 ElSalvador 33,455 -_ #4countryoforigin ElSalvador 526 0.52 Guatemala 19,549 -_ #5ruuntryoforigin India 467 0.46 Vietnam 19,525 C. #6countryoforigin Canada 361 0.36 Korea 18,565 -- #7countryoforigin Trinidad&Tobago 355 0.35 India 15,522 #8countryoforigin Ch in aexrl.Hong Kong&Taiwa 327 0.33 Canada 14,763 --.3E #9rountryoforigin Vietnam 309 0.31 China excl.Hong Kong Taiw 14,055 33 41 v.cL.rtryoforigin England 258 0.26 Taiwan 9,245 Limited English Proficiency{LEPf Language Langtsge #1 LEP Languas.= =panish 4,203 4.44 Spanish 533,544 12.:3 #2 LEP La ngu a}e Tagalog 1,304 1.38 Chinese 20,495 C.-_ #3 LEP La ngu a}e Korean 422 0.45 Tagalog 16,55c - #4 LEP La ngu age Chinese 317 0.33 Vietnamese 12,570 0.34 #5 LEP La ngu age Thai 163 0.17 Korean 11,883 0.28 #6 LEP La ngu age Hindi 115 0.12 Arabic 6,835 0.16 #7 LEP La ngu age OtherPacific lslandLangu age 107 0.11 Oth er Pacifir Isla n 5,360 0.13 #B LEP La ngu age Persian 102 0.11 Oth 2 r I nd ir I a ngu ag 3,125 0.07 #9 LEP La ngu age OtherIndicLangu age 100 0.11 Cambodian 3,117 0.07 414 LEP Language Vietnamese 97 0.10 Thai 2,576 0.06 Disability Type Hearingdifficulty 2,541 2..Gy" 126,641 3.24 Vision difficulty 1,057 1.13 88,40D 2.26 CognitivedifhcuIty 3,312 3.54 170,114 4.36 Ambulatorydif iculty 3,579 3.83 241,262 6.18 Self-ca redifficulty 1,873 _.. 102,841 2.63 IndependentlivingdifFrulty 2,71{} - 170,490 4.37 sex Male 41,260 49.03 2,101,083 49.73 Female 42,898 50.97 2,123,768 Sv.27 AL- Underl8 25,351 30.12 1,214,696 28.75 18-E-1 52,110 61.92 2,570,221 60.84 E5= 6,697 7.9E 439,934 10.41 Family Type FamiIi=_with chiIdren 12,274 56.351 50D,062 50.95 Note 1:Al I' represent ashareofthetotaIpopulationwith inthejurindirtionorregion,except familytype,whichisout oftotaIfamilies. N-ate 2:14 most populous pl aces of bi rth and languages atthejurisdiction level may not bethesame as the 10 most populous at the Region I eve I,a n d a re th us I a bel ed sepa rately. Appendix B 1 Table 2 shows demographic trends from 1990 through 2010. Tabular demographic trend data for the City and region, including the number and percentage of persons by race/ethnicity, total national origin (foreign born), total LEP, sex, age range (under 18, 18-64, 65+), and households with children. The City has experienced tremendous growth in the last twenty years. While all racial and ethnic groups except Native Americans have increased numerically, Hispanics and Asians have far exceeded other racial and ethnic groups proportionately. Whites are continuing to increase, but at a slower rate. This is true for the region as a whole. This is also reflected in the percentage of persons from other nations. However, those with limited English proficiency have not increased as dramatically. The number families with children, in proportion to the general population, (and correspondingly those under the age of 18) have decreased in the last ten years for both the City and region. Table 2-Demographic Trends (Temecula,CA CDBG)Jurisdiction (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA CBSA)Region 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % # % # % White,Non-Hispanic 19,580 80.23 46,367 69.26 47,973 57.00 1,615,830 62.41 1,540,776 47.33 1,546,666 36.61 Black,Non-Hispanic 309 1.27 2,784 4.16 3,265 3.88 168,731 6.52 263,322 8.09 301,523 7.14 Hispanic 3,545 14.53 12,197 18.22 20,991 24.94 685,672 26.48 1,228,683 37.75 1,996,402 47.25 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 586 2.40 4,310 6.44 8,172 9.71 93,331 3.60 164,035 5.04 261,593 6.19 Native American,Non-Hispanic 300 1.23 956 1.43 527 0.63 18,007 0.70 36,061 1.11 19,454 0.46 National Origin Foreign-born 2,388 9.83 7,839 11.71 15,573 15.50 360,666 13.93 612,354 18.81 920,860 21.80 LEP Limited English Proficiency 1,560 6.42 3,903 5.83 7,613 7.57 252,012 9.73 462,538 14.21 640,802 15.17 Sex Male 12,299 50.61 33,228 49.63 41,260 49.03 1,294,274 50.00 1,618,466 49.73 2,101,083 49.73 Female 12,001 49.39 33,727 50.37 42,898 50.97 1,294,518 50.00 1,636,316 50.27 2,123,768 50.27 Age Under 18 7,614 31.33 23,494 35.09 25,351 30.12 771,845 29.81 1,044,686 32.10 1,214,696 28.75 18-64 14,935 61.46 38,770 57.90 52,110 61.92 1,539,215 59.46 1,869,817 57.45 2,570,221 60.84 65+ 1,751 7.21 4,690 7.00 6,697 7.96 277,732 10.73 340,280 10.45 439,934 10.41 Family Type Families with children 3,592 54.09 7,042 62.40 12,274 56.35 331,552 50.68 266,840 54.97 500,062 50.99 Note 1:All%represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year,except family type,which is out of total families. Note 2:Data Sources:Decennial Census:ACS Appendix B 2 Table 3 Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity— Tabular race/ethnicity dissimilarity index for the City and the region. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation. Despite its tremendous growth rate, the City continues to have low dissimilarity trends meaning that there is high integration for all populations. On the other hand, the region is experiencing moderate segregation of population groups. Table 3-Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, (Temecula, CA CDBG)Jurisdiction CA CBSA) Region Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index 1990 2800 2010 1990 2000 2010 Non-White/White 2.17 11.78 18.93 32.92 38.90 41.29 Black/White 6.22 15.02 23.51 43.74 45.48 47.66 Hispanic/White 1.04 14.35 19.40 35.57 42.40 43.96 Asian or Pacific Islander/White 5.26 11.18 26.05 33.17 37.31 43.07 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details(www.hudexchange.infol Appendix B 3 Table 4 provides tabular data for the percentage of racial/ethnic groups, families with children, and national origin groups (10 most populous)for the City and region who reside in R/ECAPs (racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty). Note: The City does not have an RECAPS. As seen in many of the maps in this Assessment of Fair Housing, the region contains several RECAP areas, with the closest located approximately thirty miles away in Hemet. Table 4-R/ECAP Demographics (Riverside-San Bernard!no-Onta rio,CA CBSA) (Temecula,CA CDBG)Jurisdiction Region R/ECAP Race/Ethnicity # % # % Total Population in R/ECAPs 0 216,883 - White, Non-Hispanic 0 31,772 14.65 Black,Non-Hispanic C 21,220 9.78 Hispanic r: 150,371 69.33 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic C. 8,676 4.00 Native American,Non-Hispanic C. 938 0.43 Other,Non-Hispanic C 390 0.18 RECAP Family Type Total Families in R/ECAPs C 42,614 - Families with children 0 26,863 63.04 RECAP National Origin Country Country Total Population in R/ECAPs 0 - 216,883 - #1 country of origin Null 0 D.DD Mexico 50,507 23.29 #2 country of origin Null 0 0.00 EI Salvador 2,563 1.18 93 country of origin Null 0 0.00 Guatemala 1,424 0.66 #4 country of origin Null 0 0.00 Philippines 775 0.36 #5 country of origin Null 0 0.00 China excl.Hong Kong&Taiw 750 0.35 #6 country of origin Null 01 0.0D Vietnam 619 0.29 #7 country of origin Null 0 0.0D duras 556 0.26 #8 country of origin Null 0 0.00 urea 384 0.18 #9 country of origin Null 0 0.00 Canada 239 0.11 910 country of origin Null 0 0.00 Taiwan 239 0.11 Note 1:10 most populous groups at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the Region level,and are thus labeled separately. Nate 2:Data Sources:Decennial Census;ACS Note 3:Refer to the Data Documentation for details(w%vw.hudexchange.info). Appendix B 4 Table 5 provides tabular data for total units by four categories of publicly supported housing in the Jurisdiction (Public Housing, Project-Based Section 8, Other Multifamily, Housing Choice Voucher(HCV) Program) for the City. The chart below does not include affordable housing projects funding with former redevelopment funds. See Appendix J for a listing of redevelopment assisted units. Table 5 -Publicly Supported Housing Units by Program Category (Temecula, CA CDB6) Jurisdiction Housing Units # % Total housing units 28,971 - Public Housing Project-based Section 8 55 0.19 Other Multifamily HCV Program 97 0.33 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census;APSH Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info). Appendix B 5 Table 6 provides tabular race/ethnicity data for four categories of publicly supported housing (Public Housing, Project- Based Section 8, Other Multifamily, Tenant-Based Section 8 Vouchers (HCV)) in the City, compared to the population as a whole, and to persons earning 30% annual median income (AMI), in the City. Except for Asians, all racial/ethnic groups have similar participation rates in publicly supported housing. Hispanics and Blacks have a greater proportion of participation than Whites for project-based vouchers and Blacks have a greater proportion than the other groups for tenant-based vouchers. However, the programs do not show any patterns of segregation. The chart below does not include units assisted with City redevelopment funds. See Appendix J for a listing of those units. Table 6 -Publicly Supported Housing Residents by Race/Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity (Temecula, CA CDBG) Asian or Pacific Jurisdiction White Black Hispanic Islander Housing Type # % # % # % # Public Housing Project-Based Section 8 20 37.04 11 20.37 22 40.74 0 0.00 Other Multifamily HCV Program 45 56.96 13 16.46 21 26.58 0 0.00 0-30%of AMI 1,119 53.54 120 5.74 544 26.03 145 6.94 0-50%of AMI 2,134 46.90 280 6.15 1,219 26.79 299 6.57 0-80%of AMI 4,564 51.72 409 4.63 2,504 28.37 649 7.35 (Temecula, CA CDBG)Jurisdictionj 47,973 57.00 3,265 3.88 20,991 24.94 8,172 9.71 Mote 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census;APSH; CHAS Mote 2:#s presented are numbers of households not individuals. Mote 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info). Appendix B 6 Table 7 provides tabular data on publicly supported housing units and R/ECAPs for the City. It is important to note that the City does not have any RECAPS (racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty). The chart below shows that HCV units mostly include elderly and households with disabilities, some which are families with children present. The chart below does not include units assisted with City redevelopment funds. See Appendix J for a listing of those units. Table 7-R/ECAP and Non-RECAP Demographics by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category [Temecula,CA CDBG] Total#units %with a %Asian or %Families Jurisdiction (occupied) %Elderly disability* %White %Black %Hispanic Pacific Islander with children Public Housing R/ECAP tracts Non R/ECAP tracts Project-based Section 8 R/ECAP tracts Non R/ECAP tracts 51 12.73 3.64 37.04 20.371 40.74 0.00 65.45 Other HUD Multifamily R/ECAP tracts Non R/ECAP tracts HCV Program R/ECAP tracts Non R/ECAP tracts 85 58.24 39.56 56.96 16.46 26.58 0.00 14.29 Note 1: Disability information is often reported for heads of household or spouse/co-head only. Here,the data reflect information on all members of the household. Note 2: Data Sources:APSH Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details{www.hudexchange.infoL Appendix B 7 Table 8 provides development level demographics by Public Housing, Project-Based Section 8, and Other Multifamily' for the City. This corresponds to the information presented in Table 6 for Project- Based Section 8 units. It should be noted that these totals do not reflect the units assisted with City redevelopment funds. Refer to Appendix J lists for redevelopment units. Table S -Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Developments, by Program Category Project-Based Section 8 Project-Based (Temecula, CA Project-Based Households with CDBG)Jurisdiction Race/Ethnicity (%) Children (%) Developments Rancho California White 38 66 Black 20 Hispanic 40 Asian 0 Note 1: For LIHTC properties,this information will be supplied by local knowledge. Note 2: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding error. Note 3: Data Sources:APSH Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info). Appendix B 8 Table 9 provides tabular data of total households in the City and region households experiencing one or more housing burdens by race/ethnicity and family size. For this table, the City's percentages mirror the region and the nation on average, for nearly all categories for households experiencing disproportionate housing needs. Whites have the lowest percentage of problems at 47% with Hispanics having the highest for the major groups at 62%. The Native American percentage may be high, because of Pechanga tribal land that is adjacent to City limits. The same conclusion holds true for those households with severe housing problems. They again reflect the region as a whole. Table 9-Demographics of Households with disproportionate Housing Needs Disproportionate Housing Needs (Temecula,CA CD13G)Jurisdiction (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA CBSA)Region Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems* #with problems #households %with problems #with problems #households %with problems Race/Ethnicity White,Nan-Hispanic 9,491} 20,034 47.37 256,080 620,415 41.28 Black,Non-Hispanic 715 1,299 55.04 56,895 95,260 59.73 Hispanic 3,790 6,089 62.24 277,970 457,795 60.72 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispani 1,330 2,449 54.31 37,730 73,754 51.16 Native American,Non-Hispanic 360 445 80.90 3,154 6,294 50.11 Other,Non-Hispanic 235 575 40.87 11,725 22,795 51.44 Totgl 15,910 30,880 51.52 643,570 1,276,325 50.42 Household Type and Size Family households,<5 people 9,755 19,795 49.28 319,120 712,850 44.77 Family households,5+people 2,680 4,790 55.95 163,795 245,315 66.77 Non-family households 3,485 6,290 55.41 160,655 318,160 50.50 Households experiencing any of 4 #with severe %with severe #with severe %with severe Severe Housing Problems*" problems #households problems problems #households problems Race/Ethnicity White,Non-Hispanic 4,160 20,034 20.76 126,230 620,415 20.35 Black,Non-Hispanic 375 1,299 28.87 32,105 95,260 33.70 Hispanic 2,165 6,089 35.56 176,935 457,795 38.65 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispani 620 2,449 25.32 21,145 73,754 28.67 Native American,Non-Hispanic 150 445 33.71 1,680 6,294 26.69 Other,Non-Hispanic 100 575 17.39 6,650 22,795 29.17 Totvl 7,555 30,880 24.47 364,730 1,276,315 28.58 Note 1:The four housing problems are:incomplete kitchen facilities,incomplete plumbing facilities,more than 1 person per room,and cost burden greater than 30%.The four severe housing problems are:incomplete kitchen facilities,incomplete plumbing facilities,more than 1 person per room,and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2:All%represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region,except household type and size,which is out of total households. Note 3:data Sources:CHAS Note 4:Refer to the Data Documentation for details(www.hudexchanR&.info). Appendix B 9 Table 10 provides tabular data of the total number of households in the City and region experiencing severe housing burdens by race/ethnicity. The City's percentages reflect the region but the difference is not statistically significant among races/ethnicities and household types and sizes. Table 10-Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden* (Temecula,CA CDBG)Jurisdiction (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,CA CBSA)Region #with severe cost %with severe #with severe cost %with severe Race/Ethnicity burden #households cost burden burden #households cost burden White,Non-Hispanic 3,960 20,034 19.77 112,395 620,415 18.12 Black,Non-Hispanic 305 1,299 23.48 28,660 95,260 30.09 Hispanic 1,615 6,089 26.52 116,490 457,795 25.45 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 515 2,449 21.03 17,020 73,754 23.08 Native American,Non-Hispanic 125 445 28.09 1,300 6,294 20.65 Other,Non-Hispanic 85 575 14.78 5,425 22,795 23.80 Total 6,605 30,880 21.39 281,290 1,276,315 22.04 Household Type and Size Family households,<5 people 4,005 19,795 20.23 145,390 712,850 20.40 Family households,5+people 715 4,790 14.93 51,350 245,315 20.93 Non-family households 1,885 6,290 29.97 84,550 318,160 26.57 Note 1:Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50%of income. Note 2:All%represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region,except household type and size,which is out of total households. Note 3:The#households is the denominator for the%with problems,and may differ from the#households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4:Data Sources:CHAS Note 5:Refer to the Data Documentation for details{www.hudexchange.info}. Appendix B 10 Table 11 provides tabular data on the number of bedrooms for units of 4 categories of publicly supported housing(Public Housing, Project-Based Section 8, Other Multifamily, HCV) for the City. The chart below does not include units assisted with City redevelopment funds. The smaller units for HCV reflect that most of the units house seniors and persons with disabilities. See Appendix J for a listing of redevelopment assisted units. Table 11-Publicly Supported Housing by Program Category: Units by Number of Bedrooms and Number of Children (Temecula,CA CABG)Jurisdiction Households in 0•Households in 2 Households in 1 Bedroom Bedroom 3+ Bedroom Households Units Units Units with Children Housing Type # % # % # % # % Public Housing Project-Based Section 8 0 0.00 23 41.82 31 56.36 36 65.45 Other Multifamily HCV Program 1 53 58.24 25 27.47 5 5.49 13 14.29 Note 1: Data Sources:APSH Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.inf©J. Appendix B 11 Table 12 provides tabular data of opportunity indices for school proficiency,jobs proximity, labor-market engagement, transit trips, low transportation costs, low poverty, and environmental health for the City and region by race/ethnicity and among households below the Federal poverty line. In the following table,the higher scores reflect better standards for the City residents compared to the nation. In all of these indices,there is no significant difference among races and ethnicities in the City. In comparison to the national average (50%), the poverty and school proficiency indices are substantially higher,meaning the City has less poverty and better performing schools. This is especially true when compared to the region, which has scores substantially lower than the City. The labor market index is average compared to the nation, but much higher than the region. The transit and transportation indices are below the average, partly due to California's dependency on the automobile. Temecula's indices reflect the regional indices. Auto-dependency is also reflected with the average scores in the Jobs Proximity Index. There is little difference between the region and the City in its transit and jobs proximity scores. The same is true with the environmental health index, which is slightly below the national average and slightly above the regional average. Table 12-Opportunity Indicators,by Race/Ethnicity School Law Low Poverty Proficiency Labor Market Transit Transportation Jobs Environmental (Temecula,CA CDBG)Jurisdiction Index Index Index Index Cost Index Proximity Index Health Index Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 71.23 82.20 49.79 37.43 19.98 43.84 40.42 Black,Non-Hispanic 67.12 80.36 47.83 39.46 23.98 43.39 39.99 Hispanic 65.42 79.00 47.44 39.41 25.05 44.36 46.10 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispani 67.93 81.58 48.20 39.94 22.70 43.37 40.01 Native American,Non-Hispanic 68.80 80.86 46.38 38.79 18.10 44.07 40.04 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 65.41 79.54 48.79 39.95 24.93 49.41 39.77 Black,Non-Hispanic 54.98 80.53 51.31 41.84 29.89 56.55 38.58 Hispanic 58.03 78.90 49.50 43.87 28.51 45.26 39.43 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 46.21 73.28 44.15 43.06 35.10 57.42 38.06 Native American,Non-Hispanic 67.95 86.26 46.72 39.52 15.77 39.32 40.93 School Low (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Low Poverty Proficiency Labor Market Transit Transportation Jobs Environmental CA CBSA)Region Index Index Index Index Cost Index Proximity Index Health Index Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 52.61 53.19 34.50 37.96 25.75 49.46 38.01 Black,Non-Hispanic 42.80 44.69 27.18 42.55 31.82 48.67 29.31 Hispanic 37.51 40.97 24.20 43.12 32.68 47.41 29.22 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 60.42 58.69 43.02 41.92 29.18 48.60 26.57 Native American,Non-Hispanic 41.19 45.76 25.06 36.84 26.34 49.72 41.33 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 38.39 44.64 25.55 38.74 29.20 50.12 40.58 Black,Non-Hispanic 27.15 35.02 17.39 43.48 34.78 49.72 30.90 Hispanic 23.78 34.72 16.42 44.76 36.54 49.77 30.32 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 42.30 44.87 30.51 45.00 37.05 51.79 24.89 Native American,Non-Hispanic 30.24 39.35 20.61 39.17 32.05 52.12 38.58 Note 1:Data Sources:Decennial Census;ACS;Great Schools;Common Core of Data;SASINS;LAI;LEHD;NATA Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details{www.hudexchange.info}. Appendix B 12 Table 13 provides tabular data of persons with vision, hearing, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, and independent living disabilities for the City and region. Persons may have more than one disability represented in the following table. The percentages for the City are less in all categories compared to the region. This could reflect that more services are available in the County Seats of both counties compared to the Temecula Valley. This sentiment has been echoed in community meetings and consultations. Table 13-Disability by Type (Temecula, CA CDBG) (Riverside-San Bernardino- Jurisdiction Ontario, CA CBSA) Region Disability Type # % # % Hearing difficulty 2,501 2.67 126,641 3.24 Vision difficulty 1,057 1.13 88,400 2.26 Cognitive difficulty 3,312 3.54 170,114 4.36 Ambulatory difficulty 3,579 3.83 241,262 6.18 Self-care difficulty 1,873 2.00 102,841 2.63 Independent living difficulty 2,710 2.90 170,490 4.37 Note 1:All %represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources:ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details(www.hudexchange.info . Appendix B 13 Table 14 provides data of persons with disabilities by age range(5-17, 18-64, and 65+) for the City and region. The table reflects the greatest numbers of those with disabilities are adults between ages 18 and 64 followed by the elderly. To draw a conclusion of need, this data is skewed due to the age span of categories. Proportionately, the City has fewer persons with disabilities, except for children. This sentiment was also echoed in the community meetings. Table 14-Disability by Age Group (Temecula, CA CDBG) (Riverside-San Bernardino- Jurisdiction Ontario,CA CBSA) Region Age of people with Disabilities # % # age 5-17 with Disabilities 1,097 1.17 37,092 0.95 age 18-64 with Disabilities 4,114 4.40 241,640 6.19 age 65+with Disabilities 2,823 3.02 174,002 4.46 Note 1:Ali %represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources:ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details(www.hudexchange.infoJ Appendix B 14 Table 15 provides tabular data on disability and publicly supported housing for the City and region. The chart below does not include units assisted with City redevelopment funds. See Appendix J for a listing of affordable housing projects funded by redevelopment. Table 15-Disability by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category People with a (Temecula,CA CDBG)Jurisdiction Disability* Public Housing Project-Based Section 8 2 3.64 Other Multifamily HCV Program 36 39.56 (Riverside-San Bernard!no-Ontario, CA CBSA)Region Public Housing 189 11.67 Project-Based Section 8 630 10.36 Other Multifamily 98 4.80 HCV Program 4,478 27.11 Note 1:The definition of"disability"used by the Census Bureau may not be comparable to reporting requirements under HUD programs. Note 2: Data Sources:ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info). Appendix B 15 APPENDIX C City of Temecula Assessment of Fair Housing Resident Surveys 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country JOG, City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Thank you for taking part in this survey! The City of Temecula is preparing the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and an Assessment of Fair Housing as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This Resident Survey will be provide input from the community regarding fair housing, affordable housing, community development, economic development and other needs of its residents. The Consolidated Plan allows Temecula to utilize Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funds to enhance the quality of life of its residents. This survey should take about 5-7 minutes to complete. Your responses will be confidential and only used together with all of the responses. The survey result will be incorporated in the City's Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing report. Your responses to these questions are an essential component of Temecula's planning process. Should you need assistance or have questions regarding the survey, please contact Dean Huseby, CDBG Consultant at dhuseby@mdg-Idm.com. 1. Do you currently live in the City of Temecula? Yes No 1 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing Satisfaction 2. In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your home or apartment, on a scale from 1-4, where 1 indicates "Extremely Dissatisfied" and 4 indicates "Extremely Satisfied"? N/A - I do not live in 1.Extremely Dissatisfied 2.Dissatisfied 3.Satisfied 4. Extremely Satisfied Temecula If extremely dissatisfied or dissatisfied, list up to 3 reasons you are not satisfied with your home or apartment: 2 3. If you could change one thing about your current living situation, what would it be? ❑ I wouldn't change anything about my current living situation. n 1 currently rent, but would like to buy/own my home. U I would live in a different part of Temecula. ❑ I own a home, and would like to sell. ❑ I would like to live in a different community other than Temecula. ❑ Other(please specify) L 3 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing Dissatisfaction 4. If dissatisfied, list up to 3 reasons you are dissatisfied with your home or apartment: 1. 2. 3. 4 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing Satisfaction 5. Do you currently rent or own your home? Rent Own Other(please specify) 5 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Homeowner Questions 6. Do you currently owe more money on your home than it is worth? 0 Yes 0 No O 1 don't know 7. How concerned are you about your home going into foreclosure on a scale from "1" to "4," where 1 indicates "Not at all concerned" and 4 indicates "Extremely Concerned?" 1.Not at all Concerned 2.Somewhat Concerned 3.Concerned 4.Extremely Concerned 6 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 400 All City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Renter Questions 8. How difficult or easy was it for you to find a rental unit you could afford in Temecula on a scale from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates "Extremely Difficult" and 9 indicates "Extremely Easy"? 1. Extremely Difficult 2.Difficult 3. Easy 4.Extremely Easy 0 9. If you want to buy a home in Temecula, why haven't you? (Select all that apply.) 0 1 do not have enough money for a down payment. 0 1 cannot afford a mortgage. 0 1 cannot afford the maintenance costs associated with homeownership. 0 1 have poor credit. 0 1 cannot find a home I want to buy. 0 1 plan to move to another city. 0 Not applicable; I do not want to buy a home. Other(please specify) 7 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2% City ofTemecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing and Community Development Needs Consider the needs in Temecula. Select the top three needs within each category of eligible activities. Do not choose more than three per category. * 10. Community Facilities (Choose up to three) FI Senior Centers U Park & Recreational Facilities Fire Stations & Equipment ❑ Youth Centers F-] Health Care Facilities Libraries Child Care Centers ❑ Community Centers ❑ No need in this category * 11. Infrastructure (Choose up to three) Drainage Improvement Street Lighting No need in this category n Water/Sewer Improvement Sidewalk Improvements Street/Alley Improvement [ ADA Improvements (sidewalk ramps, accessible parking spaces, etc.) 8 * 12. Special Needs (Choose up to three) ❑ Centers/Services for Disabled ❑ Substance Abuse Services Neglected/Abused Children n Accessibility Improvements ❑ Homeless Shelters/Services Center and Services Family Self-Sufficiency Domestic Violence Services [ HIV/AIDS Centers & Services Services No need in this category 13. Community Services (Choose up to three) Senior Activities [ Transportation Services ❑ Mental Health Services Youth Activities [J Anti-Crime Programs ❑ Legal Services ❑ Child Care Services ❑ Health Services ❑ No need in this category 14. Neighborhood Services (Choose up to three) Tree Planting Code Enforcement ❑ No need in this category Trash & Debris Removal [1 Parking Facilities Graffiti Removal [ Cleanup of Abandoned Lots and Buildings 15. Businesses and Jobs (Choose up to three) Start-up Business Assistance L, Employment Training Commercial/Industrial LJ Small Business Loans ElFacade Improvements Rehabilitation Job Creation/Retention Business Mentoring No need in this category 9 * 16. Housing (Choose up to three) ❑ Accessibility Improvements ❑ Housing for Disabled Energy Efficiency (ramps, wheelchair lifts, grab Improvements bars, handrails, visual door Senior Housing bells and smoke/carbonHousing for Former Foster Housing for Large Families (5+ monoxide alarms) people) Youth Owner-Occupied Housing Fair Housing Services LJ Housing for Family Unification Improvements/Rehabilitation [I No need in this category Lead-Based Paint Testing and Rental Housing Improvements Abatement / Rehabilitation Homeownership Purchase Assistance Affordable Rental Housing 10 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Fair Housing Choice Fair housing is a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market have like ranges of choice available to them regardless of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, or any other arbitrary factor. As part of the planning process, the City of Temecula must analyze the factors associated with housing choice and discrimination. Please respond to the following questions: 17. Do you believe housing discrimination exists in your neighborhood? Yes No 18. Have you ever experienced discrimination in obtaining or maintaining housing? Yes No 11 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country IF As City ofTemecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing Discrimination If you feel you may have been discriminated against, please contact the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County at (951) 371-6518. The services provided by the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County are free of charge and are available to all residents. 19. Who do you believe discriminated against you? Landlord/Property Manager Real Estate Agent Mortgage Lender Mortgage Insurer Other(please specify) 12 20. On what basis do you believe you were discriminated against? 0 Race 0 Color 0 National Origin 0 Gender 0 Age 0 Religion 0 Familial Status (ex. single-parent) 0 Disability n Other(please specify) 21. If you believe you have experienced housing discrimination, did you report it? Yes No 13 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Housing Discrimination 22. Why did you decide not to report the housing discrimination? O Don't know where to report O Too much trouble O Afraid of retailiation O Don't believe it makes any difference Other(please specify) CJ 14 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Employment 23. Is the individual who typically serves as the primary source of income for your household currently employed? 0 Yes, employed 0 No, unemployed and currently seeking employment O No, unemployed and not seeking employment n Retired 15 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country ADA As City ofTemecula FairHousingand Consolidated Demographic Information 24. Just for classification purposes, which category best describes your total annual household income? Less than $10,000 $35,001 to $50,000 0 $100,001 to $125,000 $10,000 to $25,000 0 $50,001 to $75,000 0 More than $125,000 $25,001 to $35,000 0 $75,001 to $100,000 25. What is your ethnicity? Hispanic Non-Hispanic 16 26. What is your race? (Mark all that apply) American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black/African American Pacific Islander White Multi-Racial Other(please specify) 27. Are there children living in your home that are younger than 18 years of age? Yes No 28. Including yourself, how many people live in your household? 1 people 0 4 people (L, 7 people 2 people 0 5 people 0 8 or more people 3 people 0 6 people 17 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Special Needs 29. Do any members of your household have a mental or physical disability? O Yes, mental disability O Yes, physical disability O Yes, both mental and physical disability O No 18 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Special Needs 30. Does your current home meet the needs of the disabled members of your household? Yes No (Please describe what is needed to meet the needs of the disabled household member(s) in the comment box below) Other(please specify) 19 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country As City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Area of Residence * 31. Please list the zip code or area of Temecula you live in: 20 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country JOG, City • Temecula FairHousingand Consolidated Thank You Thank you for participating in this survey!If you have any questions about the survey, the Assessment of Fair Housing or the Consolidated Plan,please contact Dean Huseby at dhuseby@mdg-ldm.com. Please return this survey to: City of Temecula Community Development Dept. 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 21 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country oil* Encuesta para Vivienda Justa y Plan Consolidado del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula IL iGracias por participar en esta encuesta! EI Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula esta preparando el Plan Consolidado 2017-2021 y una Evaluacion de Vivienda Justa tal y como to requiere el Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en ingles). Esta Encuesta de Residentes proporcionara aportaciones por parte de los residentes de la comunidad con respecto a la vivienda justa, vivienda asequible, desarrollo comunitario, desarrollo economico y otras necesidades de los residentes de la ciudad. EI Plan Consolidado le permite al Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula utilizar los fondos de Subsidios Globales para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG) para mejorar la calidad de vida de sus residentes. Esta encuesta debe tomar alrededor de 5-7 minutos para completarla. Sus respuestas seran confidenciales y unicamente utilizadas junto con todas las respuestas. EI resultado de la encuesta sera incorporado al reporte del Plan Consolidad y Evaluacion de Vivienda Justa del Ayuntamiento. Las respuestas a las preguntas de esta encuesta son un componente esencial para el proceso de planificacion de Temecula. Si necesita asistencia o tiene preguntas con respecto a la encuesta, por favor comuniquese con Dean Huseby, Consultante de CDBG, al correo electronico: dhuseby@mdg-Idm.com 1. �,Actualmente usted vive en la Ciudad de Temecula? Si No 1 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country oil* de Temecula Satisfaccion de la Vivienda 2. En general, �,que tan satisfecho o insatisfecho esta usted con su casa o apartamento? Seleccione uno, en la escala del 1 al 4, donde 1 indica "Extremadamente Insatisfecho" y 4 indica "Extremadamente Satisfecho"? Extremadamente Extremadamente No aplica, no vivo Insatisfecho Insatisfecho Satisfecho Satisfecho en Temecula Si selecciono extremadamente insatisfecho o insatisfecho, enumere hasta 3 razones por las cuales usted no esta satisfecho con su casa o apartamento: 2 3. Si usted pudiera cambiar algo acerca de su situacion actual de vivienda. �,cual seria? 11 Yo no cambiaria nada acerca de mi situacion actual de vivienda. Yo actualmente rento, pero me gustaria comprar/ser dueno de mi casa. ❑ Yo viviria en una parte diferente de Temecula. ❑ Yo soy dueno de una casa, y me gustaria venderla. F1 Me gustaria vivir en otra comunidad diferente en vez de Temecula. L Otro (por favor especifique) 3 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country de Temecula Insatisfaccion de la Vivienda 4. Si esta insatisfecho, enumere por to menos 3 razones por las cuales usted esta insatisfecho con su casa o apartamento: 1. L 2. F 3. L 4 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country low Ip Mas de Temecula Satisfaccion de la Vivienda 5. �,Actualmente usted renta o es propietario? Rento Propietario Otro (por favor especifique) 5 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country -low 9w oil de Temecula Preguntas a Propietarios de Casa 6. �,Actualmente usted debe mas dinero por la casa en comparacion a su valor actual? Si No No se 7. �,Que tan preocupado esta usted con la posibilidad de que le suceda una ejecucion de prestamo hipotecario? Seleccione uno, en la escala del 1 al 4, donde 1 indica "No estoy preocupado en absoluto" y 4 indica "Extremadamente Preocupado"? No estoy preocupado en to absolute Algo preocupado Preocupado Extremadamente Preocupado O 6 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country de Temecula Preguntas a Arrendatarios 8. �,Que tal facil o dificil fue para usted encontrar una unidad de arrendamiento que estuviera a su alcance financiero en Temecula, en la escala del 1 al 4, donde 1 indica "Extremadamente Dificil" y 9 "Extremadamente Facil"? Extremadamente Dificil Dificil Facil Extremadamente Facil O 7 9. Si usted quiere comprar una casa en Temecula, �,por que no to ha hecho? (Seleccione todos los que apliquen). U No tengo suficiente dinero para el enganche. O No puedo sostener un prestamo hipotecario. O No puedo sostener el costo de mantenimiento asociado con la propiedad de vivienda. O Tengo mal credito. O No puedo encontrar la casa que quiero comprar. O Planteo mudarme a otra ciudad. O No aplica; no deseo comprar una casa. O Otro (por favor especifique) 8 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country oil* de Temecula IL Necesidades de Vivienda y Desarrollo Comunitario Considere las necesidades en Temecula. Seleccione tres necesidades principales dentro de cada categoria de actividades admisibles. 10. Instalaciones Comunitaria (puede seleccionar hasta 3) Centros para Personas de la ❑ Parques a Instalaciones de Estaciones de Bomberos y 3ra. Edad Recreacion Equipo I Centros para Jovenes [ Instalaciones para el Cuidado L_j Bibliotecas Guarderias Infantiles de la Salud ❑ No hay necesidad bajo esta ❑ Centros Comunitarios categoria 11. Infraestructura (puede seleccionar hasta 3) i Mejoras de Drenaje " Alumbrado Publico No hay necesidad bajo esta r� Mejoras de ❑ Mejoras de Banquetas categoria Agua/Alcantarillados ❑ Mejoras segun la Ley de Mejoras de Calles/Callejones Americanos Discapacitados (ADA) (banquetas, rampas, espacios accesibles de estacionamiento, etc.) 9 * 12. Necesidades Especiales (puede seleccionar hasta tres) ❑ Centros/Servicios para ❑ Servicios para Abuso de Centros para Ninos Discapacitados Drogas Desamparados/Abusados y Mejoras de Accesibilidad F—] Albergues para Personas sin Servicios Servicios para Violencia Hogar/Servicios Servicios para la Autosuficiencia de la Familia Domestica Centros para Tratamiento de HV/AIDS & Servicios No hay necesidad bajo esta categoria 13. Servicios Comunitarios (puede seleccionar hasta tres) Actividades para Personas de L Servicios de Transportacion dj Servicios para la Salud Mental la 3ra. Edad ❑ Programas Contra el Crimen ❑ Servicios de Asesoria Legal LJ Actividades para Jovenes [� Servicios para la Salud n No hay necesidad bajo esta F-1 Servicios de Guarderias categoria Infantiles 14. Servicios para Vecindarios (puede seleccionar hasta tres) L, Plantacion de Arboles L Imposicion de Codigos de ❑ No hay necesidad bajo esta Orden Publico categoria F-1 Limpieza de Basura y Escombros ❑ Instalaciones para Estacionamientos Limpieza de Grafito C Limpieza de Lotes Baldios y Edificios Abandonados 15. Negocios y Empleos (puede seleccionar hasta tres) Asistencia para el Inicio de un L Capacitacion de Empleos Rehabilitacion Negocio [ Mejoras de Fachadas Comercial/Industrial J Prestamos para Empresas No hay necesidad bajo esta Pequenas n Asesoramiento Empresarial categoria Creacion/Retencion de Empleos 10 * 16. Vivienda (puede seleccionar hasta tres) ❑ Mejoras de Accesibilidad ❑ Viviendas para Discapacitados Mejoras de Eficiencia (rampas, levantamientos deEnergetica sillas de ruedas, barras de ❑ Viviendas para Personas de la sostenimiento, barandales, 3ra. Edad Vivienda Primordialmente para timbres de uertas visuales Jovenes Acogidos p Y Viviendas para Familias alarmas de humo/monoxido deTemporalmente Grandes (mas de 5 personas) carbon) Servicios para Vivienda Justa Vivienda para la Unificacion de Mejoras/Rehabilitacion de Familias Viviendas Ocupadas por sus Eliminacion y Prueba de No hay necesidad bajo esta Propietarios Pintura con Base de Plomo categ oria Mejoras/Rehabilitacion de Viviendas de Arrendamiento Asistencia para Comprar Casa Vivienda de Arrendamiento Asequible 11 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country oil* de Temecula Eleccion de Vivienda Justa La vivienda justa es una condicion en la cual los individuos de niveles de ingresos similares en el mismo mercado de vivienda tienen variedades de eleccion disponibles para ellos independientemente de raza, color, ascendencia, origen de nacionalidad, religion, sexo, discapacidad, estado civil, estado familiar, o cualquier otro factor arbitrario. Como parte del proceso de planificacion, el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula debe analizar los factores asociados con la eleccion de vivienda y discriminacion. Por favor responda a las siguientes preguntas: 17. �,Cree usted que exista discriminacion de vivienda en su vecindario? si No 18. �,Alguna vez usted ha experimentado discriminacion para obtener o mantener vivienda? si No 12 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country IhiL 6 llh.� -A� dw- oil* Ow Encuesta para Vivienda Justa y Plan Consolidado del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula Discriminacion de Vivienda Si usted siente que pudo haber sido discriminado, comuniquese con la oficina del Concejo de Vivienda Justa del Municipio de Riverside al (951) 371-6518. Los servicios proporcionados pore) Concejo de Vivienda Justa del Municipio de Riverside son gratuitos y estan disponibles para todos los residents. 19. �,Quien cree que to ha discriminado? 0 Propietario/Administrador de la Propiedad 0 Agente de Bienes Raices 0 Prestamista Hipotecario 0 Asegurador Hipotecario 0 Otro (por favor especifique) 13 20. �,En que se basa a que usted pudo haber sido discriminado? O Raza 0 Color 0 Origen de Nacionalidad 0 Genero O Edad O Religion 0 Estado Familiar(padre soltero/madre soltera, divorciado(a)) 0 Discapacidad n Otro (por favor especifique) 21. �,Si usted cree que ha experimentado discriminacion?, �,lo denuncio? Si No 14 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country de Temecula Discriminacion de Vivienda 22. ,Por que usted decidio no denunciar la discriminacion de vivienda? U No se a donde puedo denunciarlo Demasiados problemas 0 Miedo a represalias O No creo que vaya a crear alguna diferencia O Otro (por favor especifique) C 15 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 'low 9w de Temecula Empleo 23. �,Actualmente esta empleado el individuo quien tipicamente sirve como la fuente principal de ingresos de su hogar? 0 Si, tiene empleo O No, desempleado y actualmente buscando empleo O No, desempleado y no esta buscando empleo n Jubilado 16 12 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country oil* de Temecula Informacion Demografica 24. Onicamente para el proposito de clasificacion, �,cual categoria describe el total del ingreso anual de su hogar? Menos de $10,000 C $35,001 a $50,000 0 $100,001 a $125,000 $10,000 a $25,000 0 $50,001 a $75,000 0 Mas de $125,000 $25,001 a $35,000 0 $75,001 a $100,000 25. �,Cual es su origen etnico? Hispano No Soy Hispano 17 26. �,Cual es su raza? (marque todos los que apliquen) Indio Americano/Nativo Alaskeno Asiatico Negro/Afroamericano Isleno del Pacifico Blanco Multi-Racial Otro (por favor especifique) 27. jiene ninos menores de 18 anos viviendo en su casa? Si No 28. Incluyendose usted, �,cuantas personas viven en su hogar? 1 persona 0 4 personas C 7 personas 2 personas 0 5 personas 0 8 o mas personas 3 personas 0 6 personas 18 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country qp Mas de Temecula Necesidades Especiales 29. �,Algun miembro de su hogar tiene alguna discapacidad mental o fisica? O Si, discapacidad mental O Si, discapacidad fisica O Si, ambas discapacidades fisica y mental O No 19 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country A 6 oil* de Temecula 30. �,Actualmente su casa satisface las necesidades del miembro(s) discapacitado(s) de su hogar? O si () No (por favor describa que es to que necesita para proporcionar las necesidades al/los miembro(s) discapacitado(os) de su hogar en la siguiente seccion para comentarios. Otro (por favor especifique) 20 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country qw L Am hjim Ohlop go de Temecula Area de Residencia 31. Por favor indique el codigo postal o el area de Temecula en la cual usted vive: 21 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country — h L L i 10- de Temecula Gracias iLe agradecemos su participacion en esta encuesta! Si usted tiene alguna pregunta acerca de esta encuesta, la evaluacion de vivienda justa o del Plan Consolidad,por favor comuniquese con Dean Huseby al correo alectronico: dhuseby@mdg-ldm.com Entregar all Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula: City of Temecula Community Development Dept. 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 22 APPENDIX D City of Temecula Assessment of Fair Housing Stakeholder Survey APPENDIX E City of Temecula Stakeholder Consultation List Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Acacia Park Apartments Affordable Housing Affirmed Housing Affordable Housing AMCAL Multi-Housing Affordable Housing Assistance League of Temecula Valley Youth Atria Senior Living Senior Autism Society Inland Empire Health Better Days ARF Seniors Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County Youth Services Bridge Housing Affordable Housing Building Industry Association Housing California Apartment Association Inland Empire Rental Property California State University San Marcos,Temecula Education Cameron Historical Building Affordable Housing Canine Support Teams Persons with Disabilities Catholic Charities Social Services Circle of Care Ministries Food Bank City of Murrieta Adjacent City City of Temecula Various departments Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Affordable Housing Community Access Center Disabled Community Mission of Hope Homeless provider Comprehensive Autism Center Health Services County of Riverside Department of Social Services Social Services County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Local Government County of Riverside Health Department Health Services Appendix E 1 Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Riverside University Health System—Behavioral Health, Homeless Housing Opportunities, Partnerships& Education Mental Health Program Court Appointed Special Advocate of Riverside County Youth Services Creekside Senior Apartments Senior Housing Desert AIDS AIDS Service Provider Economic Development of Southwest California Economic Development Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside County, Inc. Fair Housing Foothill AIDS AIDS Fountain Glen at Temecula Senior Housing Front Street Plaza Affordable Housing Go Banana Special Needs GRID Alternatives Affordable Housing Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Affordable Housing Heritage Mobile Home Estates Affordable Housing Hitzke Consulting Affordable Housing Hospice of the Valleys Healthcare Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Public Housing Authority Hugs Foster Family Agency Developmental disabilities Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula Faith Based Inland Regional Center Developmental disabilities Jamboree Housing Affordable Housing Jesus Love Church Faith based John Stewart Company Affordable Housing Ken Follis Realtor, developer League of Women Voters Non profit Legacy Ridge Developmental disabilities Love of Christ Fellowship Church Faith based Madera Vista Apartments Affordable Housing Appendix E 2 Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Margarita Summit Apartments Affordable Housing Michelle's Place Healthcare Mission Village Apartments Affordable Housing Morning Ridge Apartments Affordable Housing Mt San Jacinto College Education NAACP Protected Class Nu-Way International Christian Ministries Faith based Oak Tree Apartments Affordable Housing Our Nicholas Foundation Autism Palomar Heritage Affordable Housing Pechanga Casino and Resort Employer Path of Life Ministries Homeless provider Portola Terrace Apartments Affordable Housing Project Touch Homeless provider Rancho California Apartments Affordable housing Rancho Community Church Faith based Rancho Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Rancho en Espanol Faith based Rancho West Apartments Affordable Housing Renee Jennex Small Family Health care Riverbank Village Apartments Affordable Housing Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Domestic Violence Riverside City and County Continuum of Care Homeless provider Riverside County Office on Aging Senior Services Riverside County Veterans Services Veterans Riverside County Sheriff's Department Crime protection Riverside Transit Agency Transportation Rochelle Sherman Small Family Affordable Housing Appendix E 3 Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Domestic Violence Safety Research Associates, Inc. Special Needs and Senior Housing Senior Care Referral Specialists Senior Services Senior Citizens Service Center Food Bank Food Bank Single Mothers in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) Youth Services Solari Enterprises Affordable Property Management Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors Housing St. Catherine's Catholic Church Faith based State Council on Developmental Disabilities Developmental Disabilities TEAM Evangelical Assistance Ministries Food Bank Temecula City Planning Commission City Commission Temecula City Community Services Commission City Commission Temecula City Public Safety Commission City Commission Temecula Convention and Visitors Bureau Business Community Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission Homeless Services Provider Temecula Reflection Townhouses Affordable Housing Temecula Homeless Coalition Homeless provider Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Business Community Temecula Valley Historical Society Non Profit Organization Temecula Valley Hospital Health Services Temecula Valley Therapy Disabled Temecula Valley Unified School District Education Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association Employer The Center for Life Change Drug Treatment U.S. Vets Initiative Veterans VA Loma Linda Healthcare Veterans Vintage View Apartments Affordable housing Voice of Children Youth Services Appendix E 4 Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Warehouse at Creekside Apartments Affordable Housing Wells Fargo Business Community Western Riverside Council of Governments Regional Government Note: For some agencies,there are multiple stakeholders,but the agency is only listed once. Appendix E 5 � e —. . - -- ee ■I. LI�i. �rr F�IIi ee�— ■o:■F .�r_r 1 - L■■Y■ri■■1■■:��:1■F ■ elf alL�ee.ee.■.,�_.�Ila::-�l.1 =—e� i13+b■■�� Milo 1Ca■IFL—T, ism Illee� ,er�it # �- i> ii lees■, pure yE� L ''w'. „■�■� .,� Ell 1►S;'�^w� _i 1. ,a,.,■ IF • � _ei �' w+ren CII � lernleilu�- 1.+r'ZIgr �r libdr t �"� ?.41� R eL1a196ri�f, ON AL , •' v ul if � . � ' . e,l�n��ail4:• 1 1 #Y� 6 P j I � r.i i1 ler � ue,■ i. i - . APPENDIX G City of Temecula Map of Eligible CDBG Areas Munit.NO 804-Nd X05.00>xc, 432.44 432,47 505.00 p0 432.44 1 I 496.00 Rg�O 14 Lw 2 432.18 432.18 2 496.00 3 ' 432.17 IMP 432,16 432.67 2 32,1 8ala�� 3 432,1 432.67 a�lei, Rn 1 2 432.62' asp` 512-00 432.16 432.66 432.6 2 32,20 432 432.62, 20 � I .le w 2 a° e 432.64 432.46 432.22 3 32.6 2 432.64 2 1 M 51200 .100 g 432.65 1 00 432.65* 432.22 's 2432.57 wru0m�a 432,56 2 2 3 32S 432. 2 w1_` 1 4 .54 5 k$'5t ¢ 432.48 1 32.57 432.54 432.50 w10 3 3 a" 432.52 432.54 1 3° 2 V432.52 432.54 0'' 2 ,ter: City of Temecula NORTH ---- ---- o.5 mue CDBG-LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA MAP 2010 CENSUS AREAS (As of July 1,2014) LEGEND. -..-CITYBOUNDARY =LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS CENSUSTRACK QBLOCK GROUP APPENDIX H Public Transportation Maps Proximity to Major Employers Murrieta Rot Sprl n gs Rd '. T <JtcOt d Lake ,- mI �'ia N orle. I 0.a� n o° at °� soiao' •� © � e�J D,ZRC 0.d �• y"P m �"c° ( �t Pi.lh° is to/tq R . P 3 `• a � .. g _ ncho�li5orn R .................... tag°ad a a .� .` a �� '• /•i#� ` o d ne Pallor° �Pky �y 'r Tl-" reek � !N� r' scale:a112 N �y `� �• `•j vl _ TRANSPORTATION-RIVERSIDE TRANSIT EMPLOYERS Temecula-Murrieta-Wildomar 1 Temecula Valley Unified School District 2 Abbott Laboratories County Center to Pechanga 3 Professional Hospital Supply Resort/Temecula Valley Hospital 4 International Rectifier AftPromenade Mall-Haweston 5 Costco Wholesale Corporation 6 Macy's �I Q Hemet-Winchester-Temecula 7 EMD Millipore /// "1 8 Norm Reeves Auto Group Mun cul Temecula-Oceanside Transit Center 9 Southd Manufacturing R � Temecula-Murrieta-Sun City-Perris 10 Southwest Traders Moreno Valley-Riverside Downtown Terminal hE Ht�r<of S°uehern CaLf�ru�a Wine C°untry Temecula-Murrieta-Lake Elsinore Corona Transit Center TRANSIT LINES AND EMPLOYERS ® San Jacinto-Hemet-Temecula-Escondido Appendix H 1 Public Transportation Maps Proximity to Public Facilities Murrieta 11.9 Rd _ FW 39 k6J Via Norte I ��' 0 11 Rey�a3 33 o � G�t<�, o� a S.•eee Solane 37 4y •/ Q-S •` Ie a c`a0-0 � 4. •� � 1 �o ca j /,"Q �` 2 V Banc M1O Vis t�qd FaVba� 313 � � �•��.�RanchoGaliSoro O 25 34 n q' 316 t ao SIN 2 090 De P,v�o� PNy � 29 �. 36 croelrJ 23 ,! 19 17 I� O S0 A WUPky O PUBLIC FACILITIES „ ;�• " 20 1 Bahia Vista Park ,. F `♦ �a �, 2 Butteffeld Stage Park scale:nililiiiiiiiili�., •.• `. ! n _j 3 Calle Aragon Park osa-ra `�� I 4 Community Recreation Center 5 Crowne Hill Park 6 He,ston Community Park ��• • 7 Hmvesto.Lake Park �J B John Magee Park 9 Kent Huntergardt Park 10 Loma Linda Park 11 Long Canyon Creek Park 12 Margarita Community Park[YMCA 13 Meadows Park 14 Nakayama Park 15Nicolas Road Park 16 Old Town Parking Garage 17 Pablo Apis Park 18 Pala Community Park 19 Paloma del Sol Park 20 Paseo Gallante Park 21 Patricia H.Birdsall Sports Park TRANSPORTATION-RIVERSIDE TRANSIT 22 Pauba Ridge Park 23 Redhawk Community Park Q Temecula-Murdeta-Wildomar 24 Riverton Park 25 Ronald Reagan Sports Park m County Center to Pechanga 26 Rotary Park Resort/Temecula Valley Hospital 27 Sam Hicks Monument Park 28 Serena Hills Park Aft Promenade Mall-Harveston 29 Stephen Linen Jr.Park 0 Hemet-Winchester-Temecula 30 Sunset Park .1 31 Temecula Creek Trail Park 37h�H Murrieta-Temecula-Oceanside Transit Center 32 Temecula Duck Pond m33 TeeHillsPark Temecula-Murdeta-Sun City-Perris 34 Temecucu la Skate Park Moreno Valley-Riverside Downtown Terminal 35 City Halleart of Southern California 36 Vail Ranch Park Win,Country Temecula-Murrieta-Lake Elsinore 37 Veteran's Park Corona Transit Center 38 Voorburg Park TRANSIT LINES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ® San Jacinto-Hemet-Temecula-Escondido 39 WinchesterCreek Park Appendix H 2 Public Transportation Maps Proximity to Publicly Assisted Housing Murrieta Hot Sp ri n gs Rd _ /Lskc I m' �o`te Via Norte 3 � a Sataoe Grp o� �1 y vo SA SOlaoe 4y =a ad �e a et `♦ �� Rio;na�t.raR au a�`a m ��1 `.�—.—RanchoG oro a 0 0 ......................•• N u $a 0� d P 090 De POrio� cnPky 7 `' ♦` QFD a�epk Pky ^._i ' v. scale:o�� ON j .J TRANSPORTATION-RIVERSIDE TRANSIT -HOUSING PROJECTS RDAFUNDED Q Temecula-Murdeta-Wildomar 1 Rancho West m County Center to Pechanga 2 Mission Village Resort/Temecula Valley Hospital 3 Rancho Creek 4 Riverbank .f Promenade Mall-Harveston 5 Cameron Historical Building(Dalton Il) ]] 6 Palomar Building(Dalton III) m Hemet-Winchester-Teecula 7 Temecula Reflections Murrieta-Temecula-Oceanside Transit Center 8 Warehouse at Creekside ✓� 9 Madera Vista Temecula-Murdeta-sun City-Perris 10 Portola Terrace 3h�H:,rtf Southern CaliforniaMoreno Valley-Riverside Downtown Terminal 11 Front Street Plazaao Wino Country Temecula-Murrieta-Lake Elsinore NON-RDA FUNDED Corona Transit Center 12 Oak Tree Apartments TRANSIT LINES AND HOUSING PROJECTS ® San Jacinto-Hemet-Temecula-Escondido 18 Rancho California Apartments 14 Creekside Apartments Appendix H 3 APPENDIX I List of Public Service Agencies Served by the CDBG Program and General Fund 2015-2016 Public Service Program Amount Source Funded All From the Heart -Wheels For Warriors $ 5,000 General Fund Assistance League of Temecula Valley (ALTV) - Building and $ 5,000 General Fund Grounds Improvements and Maintenance Assistance League of Temecula Valley (ALTV)—Operation $ 7,892 CDBG Funds School Bell Program Birth Choice of Temecula—Pregnancy resource materials/services $ 5,000 General Fund —Update material Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County—Before and After $ 7,892 CDBG Funds School Care for Kids Program California VFW Motorcycle Club Empire—Food boxes for $ 1,500 General Fund veterans/families in Temecula—Food boxes and emergency funds Community Mission of Hope—Inclement Weather Shelter $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Program Fair Housing Council of Riverside County—Fair Housing $ 10,000 CDBG Funds Program GRID Alternatives—Solar Affordable Housing Program $ 12,000 CDBG Funds God's Fan Club dba Project T.O.U.C.H. — Shared and Homeless $ 500 General Fund Prevention Program—basic necessities for homeless Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley- A Brush with Kindness - offset home improvement costs to seniors, disabled and low- $ 1,500 General Fund income homeowners Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley—Critical Home Maintenance $ 26,223 CDBG Funds and Repair Program Hospice of the Valleys - Senior Assistance Program -end of life $ 5,000 General Fund services Just Add One—Job Training Program $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Michelle's Place Breast Cancer Resource Center- Breast Health $ 5,000 General Fund Assistance Our Nicholas Foundation - Peace of Mind (safety kits for autistic $ 5,000 General Fund families) Thessalonika Family Services dba Rancho Damacitas — Independent Living Program for 14-18 year olds on Rancho $ 1,000 General Fund Damacitas Campus Appendix I 1 Rose Again Foundation—The Kids of Summer $ 2,000 General Fund Rotary Club of Temecula Foundation - Holiday Food Baskets $ 5,000 General Fund SAFE Alternatives for Everyone—SAFE Domestic Violence $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Services Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Rancho Area, Inc. $ 5,000 General Fund -Food Distribution Senior Citizens Service Center—Emergency Food Assistance $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Program Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF)— $ 7,892 CDBG Funds SMURF Assistance Program Special Olympics Temecula Valley—Training Programs $ 2,500 General Fund T.E.A.M. Evangelical Assistance Ministries—Food Distribution $ 5,000 General Fund T.E.A.M. Evangelical Assistance Ministries—Temecula $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Community Food Pantry VNW Circle of Care—Emergency Food/Temporary Shelter Assistance to Needy People $ 7,892 CDBG Funds Waves Project Inc. —Waves Project $ 5,000 General Fund Total $ 178,251 Appendix I 2 APPENDIX J List of RDA Funded Affordable Housing Projects INCOME LEVEL UNITS RDA-FUNDED Ext. Very Total Address Property Owner Low Mod. Assisted DEVELOPMENTS Low low Units Rancho West 42200 Main Coachella Valley 2 43 105 0 150 Street Housing Coalition Mission Village 28493 Pujol Affirmed Housing 0 16 60 0 76 Rancho Creek 28464 Felix Ken Follis 0 8 22 0 30 Valdez 28500 Pujol Corporation for Riverbank(Senior) 0 13 53 0 66 St. Better Housing Cameron Historical 41925 Fifth Cameron 0 0 0 24 24 Building(Dalton Il) St. Properties Palomar Building(Dalton 41955 Fifth Palomar Heritage 0 0 12 10 22 III) St. Building Temecula Reflections 31111 Black Jamboree Housing 0 11 0 0 11 (Temecula Lane) Maple Dr. Warehouse at Creekside 42081 3rd St. Warehouse at 0 0 20 12 32 Creekside Madera Vista 44155 (Summerhouse) Margarita BRIDGE Housing 38 70 0 2 110 Road Portola Terrace 28673 Pujol AMCAL 0 5 39 0 44 Street 28693 Old Front Street Plaza Front Street Plaza Town Front Partners 0 0 8 15 23 Street Cottages of Old Town Varies Owner Occupied 0 0 0 17 17 Habitat for Humanity Varies Owner Occupied 0 5 2 0 7 Total 40 171 321 80 612 Note: Projects funded prior to the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency. Appendix J 1 APPENDIX K Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data Home Loan Applications by Type of Financing Type of Loan Number of Share of Number Approval Loans Loans approved Rate Home Purchase Conventional 1,702 50.0% 1,301 76.4% FHA- Insured 692 20.3% 542 78.3% VA- Guaranteed 1,005 29.5% 795 79.1% FSA/RHS Guarantee 5 0.1% 4 80.0% Total 3,404 100.0% 2,642 77.6% Refinancing Conventional 3,013 67.4% 1,827 60.6% FHA- Insured 296 6.6% 180 60.8% VA- Guaranteed 1,161 26.0% 754 64.9% FSA/RHS Guarantee 3 0.1% 0 0.0% Total 4,473 100.0% 2,761 61.7% Source: 2014 HMDA data Appendix K 1 Home Loan Approval Rates by Race / Ethnicity Type of Loan by Race/ Loan Loans Percent Ethnicity Applications Approved Approved Home Purchase Hispanic 413 319 77.2% White 1,807 1,398 77.4% Asian 199 137 68.8% African American 126 94 74.6% All others 45 34 75.6% Decline or N/A 814 660 81.1% Total 3,404 2,642 77.6% Home Refinance Hispanic 564 320 56.7% White 2,970 1,600 53.9% Asian 294 174 59.2% African American 181 100 55.2% All others 112 49 43.8% Decline or N/A 704 518 73.5% Total 4,649 2,761 59.4% Source: 2014 HMDA data Appendix K 2 APPENDIX L Fair Housing Council Data FHIR Testing Results 2010-2015 Testing Testing Type of Results Referred to Type of Resolution Basis Method Issue Date Testing Whom Resolution Agency Race Visit Terms and 5/15/2015 Lending Support HUD Forward HUD National Origin Visit Terms and 5/8/2015 Lending Support Pending Re-test Pending National Origin Visit Terms and 5/8/2015 Lending Inconclusive Pending Re-test Pending Race Visit Terms and 3/5/2015 Lending Inconclusive Pending Re-test Pending Mental Phone Terms and 2/25/2015 Rental Support Pending Re-test Pending Mental Phone Terms and 2/25/2015 Rental Inconclusive Pending Re-test Pending Terms and Does not support Not National Origin Visit 5/3/2014 Lending Closed Pending Conditions allegations Referred Terms and Not Race Visit 4/29/2014 Lending Inconclusive Closed Pending Conditions Referred Discriminatory Does not support Not National Origin Visit 2/25/2014 Rental Closed Pending Advertisement allegations Referred Mental Discriminatory Support Visit 1/21/2014 Rental Pending Pending Pending Disability Advertisement allegations Mental Visit Discriminatory 7/31/2013 Rental support Pending Re-test HUD Disability Advertisement allegations __Race Visit Terms and 2/22/2013 Rental Support Pending Re-test Pending Terms and Does not support Not Fair National Origin Visit 2/li/2013 Rental Closed Conditions allegations Referred Housing Refuse Reasonable Does not support Not Fair National Origin Visit 2/11/2013 Rental Closed Accommodation allegations Referred Housing Terms and Does not support Not Fair National Origin Visit 2/11/2013 Rental Closed Conditions allegations Referred Housing Appendix L 1 Appendix M Survey Results Stakeholders Survey Responses 1. Do you believe that housing discrimination exists in Temecula? Response: 78% did not know or did not believe that it existed. Comments: • I have no experience in this, but I do believe that it is difficult for landlords to provide at- risk families the same consideration as more stable and less risky families. • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • Disabled individuals with legitimate Service Dogs have difficulty with HOAs and landlords. • Only against low to moderate income people - and it's not so much discrimination but just a lack of available workforce housing to accommodate them. I deal with hundreds or Realtors on a daily basis and I do not believe there is any other form of discrimination going on here. • People with disabilities do not have access to live in this community because of lack of group homes. They have to go to riverside or San Bernardino • I don't know if there is discrimination but I do see there is limited accessibility for those with disabilities or limited incomes. • But I do think we have a homeless problem that is not being addressed as well as it could be. • Possibly...some residents in HOAs do not want group home, residential facilities, housing programs in their communities. • I personally have not witnessed housing discrimination nor been given examples. • In a sense yes, due to the lack of affordable housing 2. Are you aware of discrimination in obtaining or maintaining housing? Response: 83% did not know or did not believe that there was discrimination. Comments: • Towards low-income families • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • CST has written letters on several occasions to landlords and HOAs in support of clients that were harassed or denied housing based on "No Pet Policies". Service Dogs are NOT pets and ADA law protecting Service Dogs supersede these rules. Appendix M 1 • Again, we are seeing an increase in the number of homeless families seeking assistance because rents are climbing faster than their income so they can no longer maintain their existing household. Similarly, while not discriminatory in the usual sense of the word, lower income folks simply cannot obtain a home as a result of increased prices and artificially low conforming loan limits imposed by FHA, Fannie & Freddie. It's not discrimination, they're simply being priced out of the housing market. • Study should be ongoing for this issue. There are pockets of aging housing stock that is now or will soon be in need of considerable rehab. Home insurance costs and/or rehab construction costs are rising and may be out of the financial reach for younger home buyers or elderly home owners. 3. If you believe that there is housing discrimination, who do you believe is discriminating? Response: 33% thought that it would be or is landlords/property managers, I I% real estate agents; 11% mortgage lenders; 4% mortgage insurers and 18% others. Fifty-six percent did not know. Comments: • City in general, Temecula is not affordable for low-income families • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • Other: neighbors will complain to Landlord/Management about violation of the "No Pet Policy". Ignorance and abuse of ADA laws are the basic problem. • Nobody, to my knowledge, is discriminating in Temecula - it's strictly an economic reality. Some simply can't afford to purchase or even rent a home in our market. That's in a market where the median price last month was $460,000. It's even worse in coastal areas and San Francisco, with a median price of$1.6 million. I truly do not believe there is any form of racial or other discrimination present in our market other than economic factors. • Other: Home Owners Associations • It's a multi-tiered cycle which may encompass industry practices and financial institutions. However, my personal feeling is local housing discrimination is mostly a nimby issue. 4. On what basis,is discrimination occurring? Response: 29% thought that discrimination was occurring against the disabled. Between 10-15% thought that discrimination was occurring based on race, color, national origin and familial status. 3% thought that it might be based on religion. 54% did not know. Comments: • Other: Lack of Income (although not covered under fair housing law) Appendix M 2 • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • Other: Income. No other. If you can't afford a house, you can't buy one. • Opening up group homes, residential facilities or housing programs within communities is generally undesirable to the general population regardless of race, age, gender, religion, etc... Some people have misconceptions of the negatives of having affordable housing programs in their community • Extremely limited housing options for low or no income residents • Discrimination can be for any perceived bias, the most often cited is a lowering of property value. 5. What factors have or might become contributing factors for housing discrimination in the future in the City? Response: Community opposition 40.6% Displacement of residents due to economic 53.1% pressures Lack of community revitalization strategies 25.0% Lack of private investments in specific 15.6% neighborhoods Lack of public investments in specific 28.1% neighborhoods, including services or amenities Lack of regional cooperation 12.5% Land use and zoning laws 18.8% Lending discrimination 12.5% Location and type of affordable housing 65.6% Occupancy codes and restrictions 15.6% Private discrimination 37.5% Comments: • Most of City of Temecula's affordable housing is located in the Old Town area. • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • Ignorance of ADA law and abuse/fraud are the primary reasons our clients face housing (and other)problems. • NIMBY opposition to multi-family and mixed-use housing; residents displaced due to housing crisis and have not recovered; end of community redevelopment funds which had provided land and assistance for Habitat and other low-income opportunities in the past; land use and zoning laws combined with regulatory hurdles and compliance fees slowing private development. Appendix M 3 • Universal design must be kept in mind for senior housing. By not offering this type of housing, it does show discrimination against the senior population. • People are concerned about having low income developments near their home. Engaging with reputable developers could enhance neighborhoods and lessen community concerns. 6. How frequently do you believe discrimination is occurring? Response: Rampant within the housing industry 5.4% Often in some aspects of the housing market 13.5% Occasionally 10.8% Never 8.1% Don't know 64.9% Comments: • In 2014, Fair Housing completed a study for the County of Riverside so my response is an assumption based on what I know exists in other cities within Riverside County. • Again in our local market I do not believe we are experiencing discrimination in the standard sense of lenders red-lining, agents steering or other tactics. It's simply an issue of availability and affordability. • Housing industry has not kept up with the changes families are facing. Generations of families are now living in substandard housing. Careful thought needs to go into creating housing for seniors, singles, families, and generations of families needing to live together. • No knowledge of direct discrimination but indirectly through a lack of low and no income housing opportunities • The outcome of this survey and the resulting report should shed more precise information on this question. Appendix M 4 Resident Survey Results 1. When asked what are the three greatest housing needs, this was the response: Answer Options Response Percent Accessibility Improvements(ramps, wheelchair lifts,grab bars, 15.2% handrails, visual door bells and smoke/carbon monoxide alarms) Owner-Occupied Housing Improvements/Rehabilitation 30.3% Rental Housing Improvements/Rehabilitation 3.0% Homeownership Purchase Assistance 36.4% Affordable Rental Housing 21.2% Housing for Disabled 9.1% Senior Housing 27.3% Housing for Large Families(5+people) 12.1% Fair Housing Services 12.1% Lead-Based Paint Testing and Abatement 3.0% Energy Efficiency Improvements 21.2% Housing for Former Foster Youth 6.1% Housing for Family Unification 3.0% No need in this category 15.2% 2. When asked what are the three greatest community service needs, this was the response: Answer Options Response Percent Senior Activities 18.2% Youth Activities 27.3% Child Care Services 9.1% Transportation Services 30.3% Anti-Crime Programs 33.3% Health Services 18.2% Mental Health Services 24.2% Legal Services 3.0% No need in this category 24.2% Appendix M 5 3. When asked what are the three greatest special needs, this was the response: Answer Options Response Percent Centers/Services for Disabled 21.2% Accessibility Improvements 6.1% Domestic Violence Services 9.1% Substance Abuse Services 21.2% Homeless Shelters/Services 45.5% HIV/AIDS Centers&Services 9.1% Neglected/Abused Children Center and Services 12.1% Family Self-Sufficiency Services 21.2% No need in this category 30.3% 4. When asked whether discrimination exists in their neighborhood, this was the response? 82% no 18% yes. 5. Have you ever experienced discrimination in obtaining or maintaining your housing? 87% no 13% yes 6. Who do you believe discriminated against you and why? Half (50%) said that they had been discriminated against by landlords/property managers and the rest by realtors and lenders. Note: They cited discrimination because of race, national origin, gender, religion and disability. Almost all did not report it because they did not know where to go or that it was too much trouble. Appendix M 6 Appendix N Eagle Soar ` j $� k � ] \ ^ � - ■ � = § � ; � /4 $ r , ` �2 ■ ' ki}� f `§ K ' 4 -F c � ��I»� �$i| ■ ƒ; �lR � :aa � ■ ■ �■��a a { ■, | . .: . � ! _ � TL �¢ : � Appendix O Public Hearing Notices PROOF OF PUBLICATION Proof of Publication of (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and aI resident of m alrmnlPubucHm�rrY,�arid JI r9ar7 u ani-1mCwnnm"ertey Gari Lclp.elrn the County aforesaid:I am over the age of eighteen TIE t—%7 FTFJA W..0 {.,,., 01860 RTH CITY .F TEMECU FL 92R90 years and not a party to or interested in the above- In mrmdm'A sill,OW rfdt al k Imn R,VA Giy II1 WAfle5 Ip In[—r ams entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the anaal+nuneaw noelhera�mg9 �.whytlRarkmPP1 11 A--ObIl,e9amrwl:al rk drar141dNn Panldpit an Plinlmmmbny!e• printer of Pu GEr In Ira illm min ssd IPLIemmL111P Vr d,R Ch a Cnnmu nay {,ri'eb P^Sm 61Pih 47nk P,ugfam C00d r mmakrei ind MR.IhR•'John i1xiii IMPIm. THE CALIFORNIAN Al RttehR PWC 9n.R,m en IIIl,d algimenrol Arai la.9.9aaess Wfu, ,�rf��.t�ry arC Ihrilly.. Aa E,.ar{P\P of 1 r Son DAE c Oman- A PUJI I{HEARING 1—b scYwdSand bsfa ra Yhw rATYCOUNCE- R4 cuna5dwr thw myrNr{m,l dasrikhad bmf— Appli—T! atal�5ir., Chl er rnnnub published L A newspaper of general circulation, Cilyw Pref I• 2eaehe puNl rmmli.an the,heF:CdHewP Irpxnu Pb,L DAILY in the Clty of Temecula, 42590 ��r rl;,per;r.,,il,i uPhF tot .ian,hId-0mr,nd f- �` Riverside, I� ,.1 California,Ir�•�....-}F.,w..��..}}d h.Mq - .neem iu the{hW. County of Riverside, Three Lake ]udidal District, EilwtinaamentMe E oaplimmrinli,ng m:Atl�dRNS E/IP'Iq CER ,,.y which ,1 ,y a 56 SiGalrll iv,ef MIIS afl ii,.in df chat dmlWmni of Ml and wm9M!ind mm and w Iich newspaper has been adjudicated Will—, il nR GIdWa , lrmMUI P.11Yd ilir{rjklirimill 1ityty-i5enl.n 53CGl�yl3) F` I� at�d 1� laf aim W9c iePan-NI 09[[YaI11 PrAH119 ImWdlq PlrNSd arkl'k,'Mll he nr+kafrl urdee newspaper of general circulation by the Superior aLre�crnaaslLe.renireanlysinduwupitl. Court of the County of Riverside,State of California, ^�Iw�� P�q�lacr��P VIII olyd a�yn'ei�Ps m under the date of Februa 26 1991 Number FIN an mk a nt ai_6;P_Amar ilm rlOmh S IRS rq�.nmh W WRalr,c.05J 1! rr , d Case IYumber 4el-lhs hza^N,tl-}.rrA,,.—`ams 1"rrtmsinq 3ssoumenl.[hr alsessrserR wlR dotl—loped—ble nm s15r 4- ft—d IHII Indude rlr*r!>•a,mawrtlmwfi„ ora. 209105; that the notice, of which the annexed is a 4onhalk�wdtmmM1gt mu�ga�l�narbgan�ine�maadt�:w9rathws9. printed copy set In type not smaller than Arc9a I i r,poli d m,i idetltn1ffA.5 d 6Ca9un6du1 l�;h'011 d Werfiro-(.111e .R-An Wvath Wn er Pmmedirq fsSklni.�luit?rnl[w ul.l rd+iAult ar sntki nonpareil), has limen published in each regular and W d} =,lry dkrisn n.r�Chy—J1,111 IMM 1htdmlti Isnenxftd* entire issue of said newspaper and not in any �eh�-. "..I ��nk kLl;PkI YIrR[flat r,n p uw hr paGli hkaru a Ixaminl,,ndtr. supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit: Tin[ Pad,cgmli n Plea map he+iewEd A L'1:TLR OIv Al Tdf 4A Pltlir Lrofity is 36509?ata Haag iCa,W.Ca;li3 TemttlFa CHIC Lemtt-Wn—nlry flunpR.-' EkpaA;nertt al ^.U69 h1Nk SIrI,:;.TkMkmtb,CR;bid pl an 0.4C/5 web-m * riRY'W'..PMi1r4iSY11Mi11�s N. May e 27TH,2016 �Y y9u kf+R 01Y.l1nnl..Rr RNVd lke l449hinq r,ilWn m,r,wami{Ple�edhcn mc•mrsn Go lion#it1YLmntt,SmIN M81dptA:{3R dnlltll,Llly iA IM!RCUb.{OrtmurtSr qv+r Ly,i,nnl Gera tin.-1 1iyY1¢ r.41n ilfwi; la mind. Ch ?Mwl o' h'f emtll al hymJibnora 6flyahrni+w.11�:arg: PLA{E¢is 101KNlIIM43 Eiry C 111 0-6- 1 Certify (or declare) under penal of a u that a1 P4M RamialrrCk y.��,P,., .,y penalty p r] rY rmmat.,,lo,ralrtwR.i1: the foregoing I true n correct. DATE OF NE&AINd! TWE OF HEARING Tree PRA fortes somas therea}Mr m �T}y,,�� r,� g+�I.� p, Weunrkei k.MA.bm 1—al Datedat 1.11-1..13'L.75f ,til,f,SpfRi irk 11W n IiW Ia V40INIPVAn9 COMMUNITY ME.E-FIN i� r��q^ California,tNs e•r IILs7e s.,f r,d of FA,NW-9 alln-9a,: ,v:. 2 •H of May,4V m PLAICE OF M1EFFAM65 0980 w 0 Mu e n Slrem Twm S.Ir »I:Fnr MEETING PATESITIAAE33uie,}27.201 G at 4:00 P.m. 3uma 29.2q1$rt-:can P.ra- Jwy 30,7016 at 10,DO /} err ,p.�� Atl,' da in.n[d to[,urplete ihr ny i.—I, Ik.ni rr l- ,na5dlr}d PLin ^�� V LJr�"—z_.. 5 / t lett/:FM5Y4Y.lklJ`MYY' bry.camtr7T acid Eno.A SPtnaF! � ,.. 'rrl 9 5.erii:n ul IM1 %„M, 5 i}SaaCk al: Ta 1tPs.Af w,rrwa?iYilmy9iw}iW.my mfrrTamaauleSP. Cathy Via Min hI TrK lQ lase Uly NtmPM wOh Setti Pn.931 MHS RebaMddwl,.kJd 1471.ac Cathy Yia r3' >•nended,.F+S 1�nhem mak Pi45lrlulFS An Ii9N ar 149G 1tItl 1nr n9n dmenb115+rs Mit Pi 7n1H isk Far Haarip nil.a W Hee Ar4d w—1 @ar+S,a MJ In til f}WW'f`�C p)u Ik9uim Legal Advertising P hlt�an nt,n a,l at-250 @trail, the Chi'wll—1,Ir .b l!eHmb W •�r.� ' r.nrtrudxi-pour n,q,oex.-0 ym reipm a di abfll.— Ied alu—'m nand or The C/` ilfom[a V"I'r l W:'—' rlr i .,h"�l,!ur rc,rc�bq r4.d:+�aualtry sHs nr remerf.vkeeccm aThr c dy 4a an ❑reJ A leax 41 hn-ers p,m lu ITS+,t Hw.q Al 957-O'74rr1AV.AE itts sntteed mr lil k Aft Rff&a7clfthgSazDA-gn+ 7-Tlr011" Purrarsr2rrl64211130t _ A .... _.- e.. .Tr. ._..a`4-_a...... ...... .._. Appendix P Summary of Public Comments at Public Hearings RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING, WITH THE ADDITION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011 initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, the Citizen Participation Plan, and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing; D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-78 on November 1, 20117 approving the Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five-Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 12-30 on April 10, 20127 approving the 2012-16 Five-Year Consolidated Plan, that contains a housing community development needs assessment, a survey of available resources, and a five-year strategy for achieving housing and community development goals, as well as the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing which outlines the City of Temecula's strategy to affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity and remove impediments to fair housing choice; F. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-43 on June 28, 20167 approving the updated Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five-Year Consolidated Plan, Assessment of Fair Housing, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; G. The proposed Assessment of Fair Housing was available for comment between August 27, 2016 and September 27, 2016; H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and declares: A. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 5 General HUD Program Requirements; Waivers, Section 91.105 Assessment of Fair Housing (24 CFR Part 5, Section 5.154), each entitlement jurisdiction must develop an affirmatively furthering fair housing strategy and submit an Assessment of Fair Housing to HUD; B. On June 28, 2016, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing introducing the Assessment of Fair Housing process and to obtain the views of the community on affirmatively furthering fair housing in the jurisdiction's housing and community development programs. C. On September 27, 2016, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Assessment of Fair Housing and considered all of the comments made on the proposed Assessment of Fair Housing. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the Annual Action Plan (2016-2017) is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the Citizen Participation Plan is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4). Section 4. The City Council hereby approves the Assessment of Fair Housing and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the execution of these documents. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2016. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of September, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND REVIEW FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT 2017-2021 ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING 2017-2021 CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROCESS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Temecula has prepared its draft Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations as part of the grants planning process that will culminate in the preparation of the 2017-2021 Five Year Consolidated Plan. The publication of this notice is the beginning of the 30-day public review period for the AFH document. The public review and written comment period begins Saturday, August 27, 2016 and runs through Tuesday, September 27, 2016. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the draft AFH will be presented to the City Council for approval on following date: DATE: September 27, 2016 TIME: 7:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 At this meeting, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment on the draft AFH and Consolidated Plan process to provide all residents and other interested parties with opportunities to comment on the document. BACKGROUND The AFH is a five-year planning document that examines housing and demographic data to identify fair housing issues, determine contributing factors and establish goals to take meaningful actions to address and overcome any fair housing issues identified. The AFH examines data to identify fair housing issues, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs. The AFH is a prerequisite for the City to begin preparing its five-year Consolidated Plan which identifies City needs, establishes priorities and develops strategies for using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD. The City Council will also receive public comments to be considered during the development of the Consolidated Plan. PUBLIC COMMENT Copies of the draft AFH will be available on the City website at www.cityoftemecula.org. Copies of the draft AFH will also be available for public review at the following location: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592 The public is invited to submit written comments concerning the draft AFH. All written comments should be submitted to the City of Temecula Community Development Department no later than 2:00 p.m. September 27, 2016. Questions and written comments regarding the draft documents may be addressed to Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Principal Management Analyst with the City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. You may also call (951) 506-5172 or email Iynn.lehnerO-cityoftemecula.org with any questions concerning the above documents. ACCESSIBILITY TO MEETINGS AND DOCUMENTS It is the objective of the City to comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the Fair Housing Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act in all respects. If you require public documents in an accessible format, the City will make reasonable efforts to accommodate your request. If you require a disability-related accommodation to attend or participate in a hearing or meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the City Clerk's Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting at (951) 240-4225. Randi Johl, City Clerk Publish: August 27, 2016 AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA Y REVISION PARA EL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA CIUDAD DE TEMECULA BORRADOR DE LA EVALUACION DE VIVIENDA JUSTA 2017-2021 PROCESO DEL PLAN CONSOLIDADO 2017-2021 POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula ha preparado su borrador de la Evaluacion de Vivienda Justa (AFH, por sus siglas en ingles) conforme a las regulaciones y como parte del proceso de planificacion de subsidios del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de Los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en ingles) que culminara en la preparacion de Cinco Anos de Plan Consolidado 2017-2021. La publicacion de este aviso es el inicio del periodo de revision publica de 30 dias para el documento de AFH. EI periodo de revision publica y los comentarios por escrito comienzan el sabado, el 27 de Agosto, 2016 y corre hasta el martes, el 27 de Septiembre, 2016. ADEMAS, POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE TAMBIEN SE NOTIFICA que el borrador del AFH sera presentado al Concejo Municipal para su aprobacion en la fecha que se indica enseguida: FECHA: el 27 de Septiembre, 2016 HORA: 7:00 p.m. LUGAR: Camara del Concejo Municipal, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 En esta junta, el Concejo Municipal Ilevara a cabo una Audiencia Publica para recibir comentarios sobre el borrador del AFH y del proceso del Plan Consolidado para proporcionarles a todos los residentes u otras partes interesadas la oportunidad de expresar sus puntos de vistas del documento. ANTECEDENTES EI AFH es un documento para cinco anos de planificacion el cual examina datos de vivienda y demografia para identificar problemas de vivienda justa, determinar los factores contribuyentes y establecer metas para tomar acciones significativas y superar cualquier problema de vivienda justa identificada. EI AFH examina datos para identificar problemas de vivienda justa, desigualdad en el acceso a oportunidad y necesidades de vivienda desproporcionadas. EI AFH es un prerrequisito del Ayuntamiento para empezar a preparar Cinco Anos de Plan Consolidad el cual identifica las necesidades de la Ciudad, establece prioridades y desarrolla estrategias por utilizar fondos de Subsidios Globales para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG, por sus siglas en ingles) de HUD. EI Concejo Municipal tambien recibira comentarios publicos para ser considerados durante la elaboracion del Plan Consolidado. COMENTARIO PUBLICO Copias del borrador del AFH estaran disponibles en el sitio web del Ayuntamiento en www.citvoftemecula.org. Copias del borrador del AFH tambien estaran disponibles para su revision publica en los siguientes lugares: Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Biblioteca Publica de Temecula Ronald H. Roberts 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592 EI publico esta invitado a presentar sus comentarios por escrito concernientes al borrador del AFH. Todos los comentarios por escrito deberan ser enviados al Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario no mas tarde de las 2:00 p.m. el 27 de septiembre de 2016. Preguntas y comentarios por escrito referente a los documentos del borrador pueden ser dirigidos a Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Analista Superior de Gerencia, Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Tambien puede comunicarse al telefono (951) 506-5172 o por correo electronico al domicilio Iynn.lehnerO-cityoftemecula.org para cualquier pregunta que le concierne sobre dichos documentos. ACCESIBILIDAD A LAS JUNTAS Y DOCUMENTOS EI Ayuntamiento tiene como objetivo cumplir en todo con respecto a la Seccion 504 de la Ley de Rehabilitacion de 1973, tal y como se enmendo, la Ley de Americanos con Discapacidades (ADA) de 1990 y la Ley de Enmienda a ADA del 2008, la Ley de Vivienda Justa, y la Ley de Barreras Arquitectonicas. Si usted necesita documentos publicos en un formato accesible, el Ayuntamiento hard to posible dentro de to razonable para dar cabida a su peticion. Si usted requiere acomodo especial debido a alguna discapacidad para asistir o participar en una audiencia o junta, incluyendo aparatos auxiliares o servicios, por favor comuniquese a la Oficina del Secretaria Municipal por to menos 48 horas antes de la junta al (951) 240-4225. Randi Johl, Secretaria Municipal Publicar: el 27 de Agosto, 2016 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Item No . 10 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Appoint Members to the Community Services Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint Eric Levine and Eric Willis to the Community Services Commission and James (J.R.) Richardson and Bradley Sullivan to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2016, there will be two vacancies on the Community Services Commission and two vacancies on the Public Traffic/Safety Commission. These vacancies are the result of existing terms on both commissions expiring as scheduled. The application period for both ran from August 10 — September 9, 2016. Eight Community Services Commission applications, of which one was disqualified for lack of voter registration, were forwarded to the subcommittee of Mayor Naggar and Council Member McCracken for review and recommendation and six Public Traffic/Safety Commission applications were forwarded to the subcommittee of Mayor Naggar and Mayor Pro Tem Edwards for the same. Mayor Naggar and Council Member McCracken recommended the reappointment of Eric Levine and Eric Willis to the Community Services Commission and Mayor Naggar and Mayor Pro Tem Edwards recommended the reappointment of James (J.R.) Richardson and the appointment of Bradley Sullivan to the Public Traffic/Safety Commission. These appointments will expire on October 10, 2019. All applicants are registered voters and live within the city limits of the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Seven Community Services Commission Applications 2. Six Public/Traffic Safety Commission Applications City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application www.cityoftemecula.org c IVEC: (951) 694-6444 AUGI U 20I6 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecul RK3 t)EP7, Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the appnii n i submitted'. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: Planning Zcommunity Services ,Public Traffic Safety Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident f 0 Are you a City Registered Voter? ' s NAME: c- �!�`i �/�>> OCCUPATION:_ �v�� /a--- Pa`y�rcfrL ADDRESSCITY/STATE/ZI DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE; EMPLOYER NAME: _`.0,errk11 LV,, e- EMPLOYER ADDRESS:Z—?Y51) f- EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: y� t �r �w*,T U S tM, r► 1 524. '1Ej List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: /1! List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, jetc.): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged,} A 1 r 4y � P yr c+ '�v�r�.�� r�"4- understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consentAo the release of this information for lic information purposes. Signature: Date: 4r t Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE l City of Temic Board and Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 c�P .� 2016 ointment Application 'AWwww.cityotterner-ula.org �� pp I9s (951) 694-6444 CITY CLIC ft" irrrr 6 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: ❑Planning ✓❑Community Services ❑Public Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 1 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes NAME: Deena Berry OCCUPATION: Risk Management ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE EMPLOYER NAME: Southwest Healthcare EMPLOYER ADDRESS:36485iniandvwevOr,wltdornar.CA92595 EMAI Educational Background/Degrees: Paralegal Certification,Healthcare Administration Degree Program(Active Enrollment) Notary Public List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: I have not served on any City or County Boards.Committees or Commissions. List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): ASHRM-American Society for Healthcare Risk Management,Brillicares International(NPO) National Notary Association, Inland Counties Association of Paralegals,Church of Living Gospel(NPO) State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) See attachment I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. r l��' Si9 nature: Date: Please mail or ret to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 treet, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Deena Berry September 2, 2016 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk RE: Opening for Community Services Commission To whom it may concern: My name is Deena Berry and the intent of this letter is to inform you of my interest in the open position on the Community Services Commission for the City of Temecula for the term of 2016 0 2019. I am interested in serving on this commission because I want to be able to effect change and create opportunities within the community I reside. Currently, I am the Patient Experience Conunittee Chair at Southwest Healthcare and we are continually working to improve our patient experience and presence within the community. Active participation in this commission will provide me with a greater awareness of opportunities in the community and help to build relationships within the City of Temecula and throughout our neighboring cities. I am confident you'll find me a good fit for the Community Services Commission. Please feel free to contact me by phone or email with any additional questions and thank you for your time and consideration. 4 iSincerely, Deena Berry City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street RECENEiC Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application 1989 www.cityoftemecula.orR �0�6 (951) 694-6444 L LERKU OOP-i-. For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: �lanning �ommunity Services EIPublic Traffic Safety E]DId Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? In NAME: OCCUPATION. ADDRESS ITY/STATE/ZIPM DAYTIME PH1ON]�E- EVENING PHONE: � Vh1 EMP LER AME: �k'"4aY Zr1C-Z- V, EMPLOYER ADDRESS: k EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: rtr ( ►V1 �'�,Y�t'I, rV,,tiOLQ q\s� V t>�ti�? List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: �, Q 'IilQ C �1�1 Q C`x`14C ' :�'V��v� ro>� Ck List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): orc�rnu, Sw�'+;Y cutas� la nom- pY . State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) V�w Vol Ob 01 NIX\NoN�e I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. SignatureM Date: i)f±>/ �1 �0 Please marl or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 4 1000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE MEGAN o'CQNNOR August 31, 2016 City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 To Whom It May Concern. I wanted to take the time to share with you why I wish to serve on this board,and why I believe 1 am qualified for this position. I understand that there is not a perfect educational or professional background that would make me ideal for this appointment. However, I believe my heart and commitment to this city could make me a valuable addition to the Community Services team. I'm a very motivated worker and a fast learner,and although I'm new to the world of public service, I'm not new to community activism,diversity consciousness or developing relationships within our city. 1 noticed in my research that a big part of this position is interacting with members of the community as well as with the Temecula City Council. I feel some of my past experiences have helped me develop skills that would be useful to the Community Services Board,but also would help me meet the needs of our community as a whole. During my time working as a volunteer for the PTA,and PTSA, I realized how much our schools(and families)rely on community services to enrich their students and to inspire them to participate within the community. I also learned the value of working within a strict budget, limiting liability,and engaging limited resources wisely. I even learned the importance of building relationships with the media to help me convey important messages to the public. As a past volunteer for Michelle's Place,I learned how powerful of an impact networking and relationship building can have when engaging the public. I also learned the value of social responsibility and representing oneself(or their organization)accurately and ethically to the populace.Furthermore, I reamed to abide by regulations, limitations,and to uphold the confidentiality of individuals inside the organization. Working in sales(on and off)over the years has helped me develop interpersonal skills,emotional intelligence,and to improve my communication and public speaking abilities. It also taught me the value of critical thinking,creativity,and compromise.The most crucial lesson I learned was the persuasive power of active listening. As the Director of Community Services for Temecula Chess Club, 1 am now learning firsthand how important team building,conflict negotiation,marketing and organizational goals are for any organization to thrive.The team I work with now has helped me hone my growth management,collaborative abilities and cooperative skills. They have also helped me understand how to reach the needs of others in our community without stretching our resources too thin,and by making practical decisions to ensure our success reaching our organizational goals. 1 am also a full-time student pursuing my BA degree in Organizational Leadership, with the intention of continuing to graduate school.My courses are online,and allow me the flexibility of fitting in my studies around my schedule. I love to research and perform an analysis on just about any topic or issue.My major is a blend of science and psychology,and it teaches me how:to lead others using a personal and creative touch,to work effectively with others,and understand how to motivate others to reach their full potential.OL also taught me how to break down projects into smaller components, delegate and motivate,apply appreciative inquiry to discover the best in the people around me(or the organizations I work with),and decide the best method for moving forward with consistency and success. I thrive figuring out(through my analysis and research)what decision is best for an organization,or group of people,not just a small fraction. 1 have learned the value of using logic and sound reasoning to make well-informed decisions,gathering vital feedback from others,and I feel comfortable making tough choices.That being said,I also know the value of building a consensus with a team,and shelving my ego. I recognize that I can't accomplish anything without the support of my colleagues or my community.This is why I like to say 1 am passionate about learning and that I welcome any opportunity to improve or collaborate.This also means I can be flexible in my thinking, have an open mind,but also be willing to compromise to meet the needs of others when it is best to do so. My driving goal is not for me to he right but to do what is right for the situation before me. Education,giving back and making this community great are my primary motivating passions. I feel as though this appointment could help me do what I love,give back to this beautiful city my family calls home,and effect positive change for all moving forward.My children grew up as homeschoolers in this community,and the community services this city provided helped them socialize,engage with others,and to explore their world. When they entered public school,the classes at the Community Center helped enrich them and get them where they needed to be to succeed in their academic pursuits. Now,as teenagers, I am watching them go out into the community and serve the needs of others. Both my children volunteer with Hope's Community Closet and Temecula Chess Club.Hope's brings clothes to low-income families in need, and TCC helps bring affordable chess programs into our local schools. My son also volunteered with Habitat for Humanity 2 and works every weekend at Alpaca Hacienda giving his time to caring for the alpacas. My children's service within this city is helping them become responsible members of society and accomplished individuals.All of this is possible by simply being willing to give of their time to others,to learn from their experience, and to put in the hard work to effect a positive change. This is exactly what I want to do and hope to accomplish with an appointment to the Community Services Board. My family has seen first-hand what donating time to your community can do.Community service is a powerful catalyst for change. I view this appointment as a chance to give back to the city i love and call home. I hope that you will consider me for this appointment,and that you know I will work tirelessly to further the missions and goals of the Community Services Board. Vrn excited by the prospect of bringing my signature level of commitment and enthusiasm to this new and exciting opportunity,and I think this position is a great fit for me. Sincerely, Megan O'Connor 3 To Whom It May Concern: This letter of recommendation is for Megan O'Connor. While I am not the most unbiased of references, being her husband, I do have the ability to make some insightful comments having known her for near twenty years. Megan is an insightful, intelligent,and dedicated individual. She brings with her an enormous amount of energy that empowers the organizations with which she is involved. She is gifted at problem solving and has the tenacity and creativity to bring even the toughest of goals to realization. 1 have specifically observed Megan's abilities at the Temecula Chess Club,a non- profit 501c3 that I co-founded with Guy Reams. She has created a community service program, documentation for training programs for the volunteers,led organizational outreach at local area high schools,and mediated between the many personalities that present themselves. If you have any questions that.I can answer, please feel free to reach out to me. Kind regards, Shawn O'Connor CTO Perceptyx, Inc. Dear Community Services Commission Members, It is my pleasure to recommend Megan for the Temecula Board of Community Services position. Megan is the hardest working individual I know. She is always the first to complete her assignments in her college class and still manages to effectively run a household while helping with her husband's business. Megan has also recently become the Director of Community Services for the Temecula Chess Club. She will be able to apply what she has learned in this position towards helping the Temecula Board of Community Services in their endeavors to provide services and programs for the Temecula community. In addition, Megan has clearly shown a love for education and always works towards giving back to the community. Megan has remained actively involved in the Temecula Unified School District through her involvement with the PTA and volunteering her time to help the teachers at her children's schools. Megan has my enthusiastic recommendation. She is kind, compassionate, intelligent, and an ambitious person who has a clear sense of direction and purpose. I am confident that she will bring more to the table working in this position than you could have ever imagined. Feel free to contact me any time at Sincerely, Kimberly Pesavento ii September 6, 2016 TO: Whom It May Concern FROM: Wendy Davis RE: Megan O'Connor My name is Wendy Davis and I am an RN, BSN, Case Manager and currently work at Rady Children's Hospital,San Diego. I am also a business co-owner of Neuro Rehab Connection here in Temecula. I am writing this letter on behalf of Megan O'Connor. I have known Meg for almost 5 years now. I have watched her in several different roles and she never ceases to amaze me. f originally met her as a home-school mom in which she actively participated in the education of her children.Then,when her children entered the public school system, Meg stopped at nothing to assure they were caught up and able to function properly and learn within their new environment.She also became very active in the FTA as well as a frontline activist for the"Save Hayes"campaign. Currently, Meg is enrolled as a college student in which she plans on achieving her MBA. Within all of the above-mentioned rolls, I have personally witnessed a few things from Meg. For one,she gives her heart and soul to everything that she does.She doesn't do anything half way. Her integrity as well as her commitment to achieving the highest level of standards, is truly unmatched.She has a profound amount of empathy and will go out of her way to help others in any way that she can. She is also very dependable and reliable. If she says she will do something,she does it and she does it well above the expected standard. 1 consider Meg an extreme asset to anything she gets involved in. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you, f Wendy Davis September 6, 2016 TO: Whom It May Concern FROM: Wend Davis RE: Megan O'Connor My name is Wendy Davis and I am an RN, BSN, Case Manager and currently work at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego. I am also a business co-owner of Neuro Rehab Connection here in Temecula. I am writing this letter on behalf of Megan O'Connor. I have known Meg for almost S years now. I have watched her in several different roles and she never ceases to amaze me. I originally met her as a home-school mom in which she actively participated in the education of her children.Then,when her children entered the public school system, Meg stopped at nothing to assure they were caught up and able to function properly and learn within their new environment. She also became very active in the PTA as well as a frontline activist for the "Save Hayes" campaign. Currently, Meg is enrolled as a college student in which she plans on achieving her MBA. Within all of the above-mentioned rolls, I have personally witnessed a few things from Meg. For one,she gives her heart and soul to everything that she does. She doesn't do anything half way. Her integrity as well as her commitment to achieving the highest level of standards, is truly unmatched. She has a profound amount of empathy and will go out of her way to help others in any way that she can. She is also very dependable and reliable. If she says she will do something, she does it and she does it well above the expected standard. I consider Meg an extreme asset to anything she gets involved in. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Wendy Davis September 6, 2016 To Whom It May Concern; This letter is my personal recommendation of Meg©'Connor. I have known Meg for five years, since our children have attended Elementary School together. We met while volunteering for Rancho Elementary School's PTA. Meg was outgoing, personable,friendly and willing to jump in to help some of the newer moms, such as myself, gain a better understanding of the functionality of the PTA on campus. Meg and I became close friends after that, and I was able to watch Meg serve on a number of committees, such as helping to organize the Fall Festival, serve as the Room Parent Coordinator (wrangling 20 room moms together and help them organize each of their classes) as well as serve as the Hospitality Chair where she coordinated breakfasts, lunches and special events for the teachers and staff on campus. Meg's personable nature, her outgoing and cheerful personality definitely shined as she served in a volunteer capacity. She was able to encourage and inspire all types of personalities to become involved in the PTA, and she led multiple crews of volunteers with ease and grace. She is an active listener and a "get-it-done-with-a-smile"type of woman, and it was a pleasure and honor serving with her in the many roles she undertook. Meg is passionate about people. She sees the best in others and looks for opportunities to make a difference. She has always given back to our community through volunteering, standing up for what is right, furthering her education by returning back to college to gain more knowledge and share her skills with the Temecula community. Meg will be an asset to any organization, and I can confidently recommend her for and position or undertaking that she chooses to pursue. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss the recommendation further. Sincerely, Kimberly Legg September 4, 2016 To Whom It May Concern, It is my pleasure to recommend Megan O'Connor for an appointment to the Community Services Board with the City of Temecula. I have full confidence in her talents and skillset that is needed for this position. She is an exceptionally determined individual, who continuously seeks out new challenges. I am also of the opinion that she will not only be a great board member but she will inspire others on the board as well. I met Megan when she was a student in my Team Building course at Brandman Univeristy. As her instructor, I was thoroughly impressed with the veracity in which she learned the course information. She has the uncanny ability to critically analyze and find viable solutions that not only made sense,but gave me a new perspective on team building issues. Having taught this course several times, never have I learned so much from reading a student's work. To date she is the most professional, reliable and exemplary student I have ever had the pleasure of teaching. Megan is an extremely driven individual and her tenacity was contagious to contemporaries in the class as well. I have no doubt that she will bring this same determination to her role as a Temecula Community Service board member. I urge you to bring Megan on to the board, she will be a great asset to the team. If you would like to further discuss Megan and her capacity as a board member, please do not hesitate to contact me at or through email Sincerely, Felicia R. Haecker, Ed.D. Founder and CEO Dog Tag Divas S Q A v D NOII�JNO Lu VLC ry, ft Mc Cl ` a O(L Cil-l C� POD4 � avl C)v l +�/U O a r OcU l PQ-Y—) ALL , l thank you - City of TemW,041' Board and Commission (@—) 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 8 2D Appointment Application www.cityoftemecula.org � (951)694-6444 I<:ITII'CN.F_IritK*b ga&V'W For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted.The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check acrnmunity QPlanning one, Services EAPPublic Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? NAME: L'4 Fi z OCCUPATION:ONE ADDRES CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: _ 5c7tj-C' EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: List any City or County Board, Committee or Cornrnission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: �+S� fJff % V17�2r ['rfVi_ �77%L D� ►Z 'C-'tF r,vCr-�l� s List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) ?1,0"6_5�45G= /9-77;�G/-1�'� I?X7*572 c--"v ces s 1 understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Q r Signature: - _ _ Date: Pleas r re�aa�intreet, .1 of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Larry R. Metz To Whom It May Concern; As a resident of Temecula since February 2002, 1 have seen the outstanding growth of this city. Temecula is my home and I have been privileged to live here the past 14 years. I am now developing temeculagolftrail.com,a website that will attract groups of Golfer's from all over the nation to Temecula to play golf and enjoy the wonders of our City. As a small business owner I have had several businesses and offices in Temecula. My Primary business has been Suncoast Marketing which is a Manufacturers Rep firm representing Major Consumer Electronics firms. I have called on Major Retailers including, Wal-Mart,Costco,Target and BestBuy. I have also called on Pechanga Resort and Casino selling their retail gift shops. I have owned a restaurant delivery service called We Just Deliver,from 2006 to 2009.We employed up to 11 drivers and delivered for 30 of the local restaurants. After 4 years we sold to our competitors Dine-In Delivery. After Senior Management positions at Emerson Radio, Packard Bell Electronics and Panasonic, I decided to venture out on my own and started Conquest Marketing Group, Inc.to represent Manufacturers who wanted to sell to the Major Retail Chains, Buying Groups and Distributors. I have been self-employed since 1992. 1 have a great deal of knowledge in regard to building businesses, contracts, negotiating skills and working with all levels of people,from senior management to floor sales people. I believe that I would be an asset to the planning commission board. Larry Metz . Larry R.Metz Current- Owner Temecula Golf Trail—In development. TemeculaGolfTrail.com is a new online site that offers Golfers from all over the country Tee times, Hotel reservations, and Tours for Golf outings to the Temecula area. (Currently in development) (Also SanDiegoGolfTrails.com and Socalgolftrail.com) 1992-Present—President of my own manufacturer's rep company. Originally Conquest Marketing Group, Inc and now called Suncoast Marketing. Selling to major retailers, including Wal-Mart, Sam's Club, Costco, Target, and BestBuy, also Distributors and Buying Groups on a national basis. Consulting to and Representing Audiovox, RCA, Emerson, Energizer, Kinfine-USA, Concept Green Energy Solutions. 1990-1992—Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing,EMERSON Computer Corp. I was recruited to run Emerson's new Computer Division that I took from zero to over 200 million dollars in sales in less then 18 months. EMERSON bought out my contract when they asked me to move to New Jersey and I chose not to accept. 1983-1990—Executive Vice President, Packard Bell Electronics. I purchased the name Packard Bell from Teledyne for$90,000 for three partners. I took the company from zero to over$650 million dollars in sales. Packard Bell owned 42%market share for the retail computer category. Responsible for all Sales, Marketing and Operations. 1980-1982—President Filmway's Audio Group. I was originally hired to run Filmway's Audio Concepts a high-end Audio retailer catering to the recording and broadcast industry. After successfully turning that profitable they asked me to run two other companies Filmway's Audio and RF Wireless Rents. Eventually they made me president of all 5 companies in their Audio Group and after turning them profitable, I helped negotiate the sale of these companies. 1974-1979—S. California Sales Manager,Panasonic Inc. I controlled sales for 12 divisions of Panasonic, including Technics, Video,Audio,Microwaves, Vacuums, Batteries,and even Bicycles. Took the territory from$1 million to over$10 million. Prior employment, Edwards of California, Christian Dior Menswear and American Airlines. Personal—Divorced,three grown children. Avid Golfer, Temecula resident since 2002. President Chatsworth Youth Sports 1977-1980 Commissioner Valley Conference Youth Basketball 1981 Commissioner Golfer's Getaway 2006 to Present Education—NY State University at Farmingdale 1962-64 American Airlines Management Training programl966-1967 November 12. 2015 E o Whom it May Concern: l am writing a le mer of recommendation on behalf of my longtime friend and business associate Mr. Larry Mem_ Larry and l 'began working together more than 20 years ago and have maintained an even greater friendship at the same time. I have always appreciated Larry's ability to communicate well even in extreme environments such as the large retail market. His professionalism has always .made it possible in all our business ventures to succeed. His biggest attribute may be his integrity and respect for making sure proiects were completed as promised_ Larry's keen ability eNrilb follow up and follow thru skills made his career in our industry a great success. 1 believe Larry Metz would be a great asset to the City of t emecula and possibly improve the abilities of offers to build better bridges of communication vit'h.in your community. Best of luck as l know LaMi would be a great addition to your team. Best re ares. w - --- bike Churchman Sr. /ice President Emerson Radio Corp EMERSON RADIO CORP. 3 UI RSZTS' PLAZA #405 HACKENSACK, NNEW JERSEY 07061 973,428.2000 1 November 9, 2015 Temecula City Planning Commission Re: Larry Metz To Whom It May Concern: I have been asked to provide a letter of reference for a good friend Larry Metz. I have known Larry Metz for approximately 10 years and have found him to be a man of great moral character and honesty. One of Larry's many strengths is his ability to work with others in problem salving issues between parties. He is a very kind individual who always believes in fairness between people demonstrating great communication skills. He has many friends which is a testament to his success in life and being someone we have great respect for. It has been a pleasure to be associated with Larry Metz. I would highly recommend him as a member of the Temecula City Planning Department. Sincerely, Tom Bardos CEO Western Computer Western Computer 351 Candelaria Road • Oxnard,California 93030 (805)581-5020 www.westerncomputer.com i SLP Enterprises Steven L Pad ett Thursday, November 12, 15 City of Temecula Planning Commission To whom it may concern: This letter should serve as letter of reference (both professional and personal) for Mr. Larry R Metz who is seeking to fill an open position on the City of Temecula Planning Commission. I have known and worked with Larry for over 40 years.In many situations we were peers and in many He was my supervisor. In that period of time we have become close personal friends as well. Larry would make a good candidate for your position for some of the following reasons: ❖ Never ending work ethic ❖ Works well with other professionals ❖ Good organizer ❖ Excellent and professional sales person ❖ Completely honest with uncompromising principals. I hope this letter will help you make a favorable decision for Larry to flit the position you have available.You could not do better. Respectfully, Steven L Padgett Robert Vassallo November 8,2015 To whom it may concern: I have been friends with Mr. Metz for over 50 years. I am certain he will be an asset to the planning commission as he is a personable, logical and intelligent individual. His past successes can attest to this. I know he is sappy and proud to be a resident of Temecula and would work hard for the future of your city. Robert E Vassallo Sent from my Whone 11/812015 Gmail-RE:Reccom"ation for opening on theTernecUla City Planning Commission C; Larry Metz RE: Reccomendation for opening on the Temecula City Planning Commission 1 message Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:01 PM Ta: "Metz, Larry To whom it may concem, 1 have known Lary R. Metz for many, many years. We first met in the 5th grade in 1953. We have remained good friends over the years. Larry has always had an excellent rapport with people of all ages. His excellent communication skills allow him to connect with all kinds of people. He is one I can recommend with complete confidence and I know that he will measure up to your expectations. In summary, I highly recommend Larri for any position or endeavor that he may seek to pursue. He would be a tremendous asset to any organization. Sincerely, Peter R. Thorsen 1l 11/12/2015 Gmail-City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available-Closes 11/20/2015 Larry Metz City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available - Closes 11/20/2015 DAN VUICICH Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:04 PM To: Larry Metz I have known Larry Metz both personally and professionally for 30 plus years. Two words immediately come to mind-Integrity and perseverance. I have witnessed Larry grow companies against the toughest odds and succeed only to shoulder the burden of others shortcomings. The relationships he has gained in the CE world are legion and very loyal. From computers, peripherals, audio products, furniture and video products Larry has blazed the trail with unique offerings and creative procedures. But far and away where Larry has shined beyond most human capabilities is with his family. He has faced down incredible odds and brought his family through. I know his family very well and all are people you would love to know and would enhance your lives. They arrived at this place only by the love and strength of Larry. Obviously Larry's attributes would make him an excellent commissioner. Dan ' uicich From: Larry Metz Sent: Friday, November 6,2015 5:11 PM To:John Spinelli; Mike Churchman; Pete Thorsen;John Gentleman; Steve Padgett; Dan Vuicich; Robert Vassallo; Tom Bardos Subject: Fwd: City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available-Closes 11/20/2015 [Quoted text hidden] 111 City of Te �a Board and Commission - 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92594 �� n '� a �' " Appointment Application 4989 www.cityoftemecula.dt (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: _Planning Zcommunity Services Public Traffic Safety Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? 5 NAME: EP—IC- l-f—_- Jt*'jc OCCUPATION: ZEGc IONAL- } )19�ECTVR, ADDRESS: TATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: ANG".r-1 EMPLOYER ADDRESS. Q&eL ,CA q`I�I �- EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: Lis any City or County Board„ Committee or Co mission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: �F7►�wtt-t n�� .�( �i LPS Cv wt�,c.l I � ..!U I LI 2.01 S) List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations„ service clubs, etc.): 6 l & LAA S ITS) State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) See a#q cfl, d understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature:_JwtmwmDate: Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE ERIC LEVINE Personal Statement— September 1, 2016 In June 2015, 1 wps a qpk, ed to fill the unexpired term on the Temecula Community Services Comm issionji6ft vat hth Michael McCracken was appointed to serve on the City RM Council). lUz. Y I have now had the honor of seg on the Commission for over a year, and would like to continue doing so. Our commis n has a lively and interactive discourse each month, and I believe all of our commissionersprovide unique perspective. We often hear from employees and others that the CSC has"the best group of commissioners" they've seen in some time. I have no frame of reference.ori'that, but I have witnessed the tireless efforts of the TCSD, planning memorable events and activities. I have had the opportunity to judge 3 I grade art at the Museum, go on a haunted tour of Old Town, participate on the Sports Council and in arts events, and parades, and many other events. Truthfully, I've seen the best that our City has to offer, and I see folks continue to turn out. And I continue to be impressed. My other major volunteer work involves the Boy Scouts of America. I am currently serving as the Tahquitz District Chairman, with responsibility for council operations for units in the greater Temecula Valley area. I also serve as an Assistant Scoutmaster in Boy Scout Troop 14$, where my son is a patrol leader. In conclusion, serving the city has given me a more balanced perspective and has been a great opportunity for me. I've met many fantastic city staffers and residents and had a lot of fun. I'm not quite ready to be done. That said, I request the opportunity to be appointed to a full-term as Commissioner. I believe my perspective and participation has made a difference. Sincerely, Eric Levine City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street RECEIVED Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application 198www.cityoftemecula.orCl3E[' gym(„)1 (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: ❑Planning ✓❑Community Services ❑Public Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? NAME: Martha A. Howard OCCUPATION: Retired ADDRESS. CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: n/a EMPLOYER NAME: n/a EMPLOYER ADDRESS:n/a EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: BA Psychology List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: None List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): Latina Association of Riverside County. State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) I am a Temecula resident,since 1994; 1 would like to get involved serving my community. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. D g � � Signature:. Date., Please m l or return to. City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 1000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 1'11 CAC-+ 15L A%A/ACbC ^C TLAC Ar%1 Ar%1 1\1C City Of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application t989 www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration, ypu must currently be a resident, of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits f the City of Temecula at the time the e plicatiod ' ir,,,, li ,,', submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline., ) 9 2( 1116 Please check one: ❑Planning ❑✓ Community Services ❑Public Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review/�Board"`' � Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 8 Are you a City Registered Voter? yes NAME: John S. Locke OCCUPATION: Doctor ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE EVENING PHONE:_ EMPLOYER NAME: Corona Temecula Orthopedic Medical Group EMPLOYER ADDRESS:28078 Baxter Rd, Murrieta, CA EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: B.S.Chemistry,California State University East Bay 1986 M.D. Uniformed Services University,Bethesda, Maryland 1991 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: none List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons,Riverside County Medical Association, Rancho Community Church, Liga Flying Doctors(Mexico Medical Volunteers) State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) See attached sheet I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. a Signature: -- Date: Please mail 0--return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Corona-Temecula Qrthop A(Ldic Assoc�qtes MEIDICAL.- G R 0 U F:' G.Carleton Wallace,M.D. General Orthopaedic Surgery Total Joint Replacement September 8, 2016 Arthroscopic Surgery Richard L.Roache,M.D. General Orthopaedic Surgery Total Joint Replacement Sports Medicine I would like to be considered for a position on either the community services or public and Bradley L.Baum,M.D. traffic safety commissions. I have been a resident of Temecula for 8 years. Prior to that I General Orthopaedic Surgery was in the U.S.Navy, stationed in various places from Oakland, 29 Palms and Camp Foot&AnKe Disorders Total Joint Replacement Pendleton, California and Portsmouth,Virginia. Sports Medicine Arthroscopic Surgery Ghassan S.rooma,M.D. I was born and raised in northern California(Hayward), a suburb in the San Francisco Bay General Orthopacd�c Surgery Area that was growing quickly, I saw what can happen when comillunity services are Hand Et Upper EXL(ernitY Surgery Total Joint Replacement planned for and also saw what happens when they are not. My career in the Navy lasted 25 Sports Medicine years and retired as a Navy Captain(Medical Corps) three years ago. In addition to being a Industrial Cnjurfes doctor, I served as a,department head and chaired several committees such as process Mario E.Luna,M.D. Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon improvement, ethic's', and moral, welfare and recreation (MWR). These experiences taught Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery me the value of proactive planning, communication and teamwork. Amy Starry,D.O. Gvioral Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Medicine Temecula is clearly a wonderful place with a great future. I feel I am uniquely qualified to Shoulder Surgery be a member of a commission for several reasons. My degree in science will allow me to John Lack&,M.D. look at issues involving community services and public safety, traffic flow, code Surge General Orthopaedic;Surgery Sports Medicine enl5orcement, recreation programs, and economic development with a scientific, fact based Shoulder Surgery focus. In addition, my 25 years in the military and medicine gave me a breadth of Reza Roghani,M.D. experiences, working with a variety of people,paperwork and issues. General Orthopaetfic Surgery Sports Medicine Shoulder a Eltnwo Surgery Total Joint Replacement In regards to community services, I see a need for additional partnering and coordination Demetrio Quismorio,Jr PA-C with our faith based organi7iitions and set-vice clubs. '['here are lots of people who want to Orthopaedic Physician Ass'i-qtaot improve the COMInUnity and May just need a lbw resources or direction. Having 4 kids and Steven M.Hinajos,PA-C talking with Temecula residents,there is a need for a tennis complex. As a doctor, I see the Orthopaedic Physician Assistant need for improving public safety every day. Improving education, safer drivers, child safety Do-Thou Neria,PA-C issues, accident prevention, emergency response times and disaster preparedness are some Orthopaedic Physician Assistant of the issues I Would emphasize. My experiences have given me the background and foresight. Now, I have the time and desire to be a part of and contribute to the reat future of Temecula. If you have any questions, I can be reached at iiWWWiir Thank you for your time. Io Odi n WS. L o cReM.D.W .................. ... ... ...............—.—. 341 Magnolia Avenue,Suite 101®Corona, California 92879®Telephone: (951) 735-6060 Fax: (951) 735-4510 28078 Baxter Road,Suite 330®Murrieta, California 92563®Telephone: (951) 677-2157 www,CTOAMG.com RECEIV EIL: Cit of Temecula s 2016 Y Board and Commission 41000 Main Street ttvl Y ,;L KI(S DEFY, Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application www.cityoftemecula.org t�9 (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: ❑Planning Ocommunity Services Public Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 23.5 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes NAME.: James "J.R." Richardson OCCUPATION: Engineer ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: Raytheon EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 1$01 Hughes or.Fullerton,CA 92833 EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: B S Aerospace Engineering,Cal Poly Pomona-1984(Computer Science minor) M S.Aerospace Engineering,Cal Poly Pomona-1992(Control System Design emphasis) List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: City of Temecula-Public)Traffic Safety Commission,2013-2016,Chairman 2016 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): International Council on Systems Engineering(INCOSE)-Certified Expert Systems Engineering Professional(ESEP)(professional) International System Safety Society(isss)-member(professional) Intelligent Transportation Society of America(ITSA)-member(technical) State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) see attached sheet understand that any or all information on this form may be Verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes.",,-- Signature: Date:8/12/2016 Please mail r etum :City of Temecula, dity Clerk's Office 410 Main eet, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE WARE F THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Application for Public Traffic Safety Commission—James Richardson—page 2 State why you wish to serve on this commission As a resident of Temecula for over 23 years, I would welcome the opportunity to continue to serve our community as a member of the Public Traffic Safety Commission, to which my education and experience are ideally suited. State why you believe you are qualified for the position As an Engineering Fellow for Raytheon, I have broad experience working safety programs at both the system and enterprise level, transportation/traffic programs, and traffic safety technology research and innovation projects. My current & former Raytheon roles include: • GPS Next Generation Operational Control Segment (OCX) System Safety Lead (present) • GPS Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Safety-of-Life Certification Lead (2003-2006) • Massachusetts Turnpike All Electronic Tolling System (AETS) Performance Analyst (present) • US DOT Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) Program —Off-Board Navigation Lead • Oregon State DOT Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Program— Raytheon Solution Architect • Cooperative Pedestrian Warning System (CPWS) — Raytheon Chief Engineer (w/Toyota) • Universal Pedestrian Warning System (UPWS)—Architect & Chief Engineer • Infrastructure Basic Safety Message (BSM) Generator (IBG)— Inventor & Project lead • Virtual Reference Station (VRS) & Pedestrian Safety research w/Cal Trans and UC Berkeley PATH Some of my additional Raytheon achievements, awards and contributions include: • Six (6)Granted US Patents for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technology • Two (2) additional US Patents Pending for Interactive Control Systems technology • Two (2) Raytheon Fullerton Invention Review Committee (IRC) "Innovation Awards" • Four (4)time Raytheon Innovation Challenge (RIC) — Funding Winner (2010-2013) • 2010 Smart Transportation Systems Innovation Challenge—Grand Prize winning team • 2012 Systems Engineering & Architecture (SE&A) Symposium— "Best of Spotlight" Award • 2010 Raytheon Mentoring EXCELLENCE Award recipient • Published papers and presented at 7 Raytheon internal Engineering Symposia (2006-present) • Published papers and presented at 8 external Transportation Industry meetings (2006-present) • Cal State Fullerton Engineering and Computer Science (ECS) Dept. — Master's Project Liaison • Cal State Fullerton Mechanical Engineering (ME) Dept. —Guest Lecturer on Innovation My additional relevant external (non-Raytheon) appointments & community service include: • OmniAir Consortium (ITS Comm & Safety Certification Authority)— Board of Directors • Cal State Fullerton Electrical Engineering Dept. Industry Advisory Board (IAB) —Vice Chair • Cal Poly Pomona Aerospace Engineering Dept. Industry Action Council (IAC) • UC Riverside Electrical Engineering Dept. Board of Advisors (BoA) • Invited Expert Panelist— 2013 "Thinking Highways" Debate on "Distance-based Charging' City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application iyay www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 o 1 2015 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and fil MRKS 1132PT. Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: ❑Planning ❑Community ServicesOPublic Traffic Safety ❑Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident c;2- t Are you a City Registered Voter? LAPS NAME: 0k' OCCUPATION: k ?4t(ea Ve-� ADDRESSM CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: LU/A EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: & r,J s NA V I s•A• R a i r c areal n)a n Pea Ltoc NPP-& 'IONk->3g20 ` As5ociattes dejy,ee : Aeronc ul/'Cs List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: C' G► arO(vy)oal P015 R .o.A . e0ard 0> d l'ree yrs S lace. 261t List any organizations to which you belong (professional. technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): Die9p 61&A Oan� Donar PrOce5Sor Strrce 2012 � he , A� State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) �" f✓It)Ylbr relit f'CU fq arid AVf.{YI`#- 4v do Ail Par+ -to keep /� Sa tye a pd hear; tifm, understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Information for public information purposes. Signature: Date: / 9 A U9 US� 201 Please mail or return to: City of mecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main ,street. Temecula. CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE City of TemeqW& Board and Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 7 i; Appointment Application 19g9 ]] www.cityottemecula.org I— (951) 594-6444 CITY CLORKS D111I9'1. For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: Public Traffic Safety Town Local Review Board ❑Planning [:]Community Services Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? NAME: Bradley J. Sullivan, D.C. OCCUPATION: retired ADDRESS ITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: 1983 Doctor of Chiropractic, 1995 Certified CA Office of Emergency Services in Volunteer ManagementlOrganization, 2002 First Civilian Graduate of the FEMA Academy CERT Preparedness in MD List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 1994-2001 Member of the west Hollywood Public Safety Commission, 1995-2001 Chair west Hollywood Disaster Preparedness Program(CERT), 1995-1996 Member west Hollywood Economic Planning Committee,Member west Hollywood Pedestrian Safety Committee List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): California Chiropractic Association(President 1993-1994,Member of Board of Directors 1996-2616,American Chiropractic Association,So 40 2005-2015 State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) I have had a life long passion for public safety and being of service. I have extensive training in Disaster Preparedness and am a FEMA Cert I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: Date: 4"f se mail or retum to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 4 1000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE BRADLEY J. SULLIVAN, D.C. August 21,2016 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Appointments Committee/ Honorable Members of the City Council RE: Public Safety/Traffic Commission Application Please allow me to introduce myself, I have an extensive background in Public Safety and Public Health issues. I have previously served on the West Hollywood Public Safety Commission and formed one of the first CERT Teams in CA. I was the first civilian allowed to go through the FEMA Academy for CERTS Train the Trainers and taught CERT for the Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Regional Community Police Institute, City of West Hollywood and City of La Canada.. As a Commissioner on an advisory Commission, I fully understand the role and responsibilities involved. I understand the sensitivities required in representing the City in any role and have excellent people skills. I am retired due to an injury years ago and have plenty of time to devote to the City of Temecula. Due to my injuries, I discontinued teaching CERT and Red Cross Certification's as I can't always fulfill the physical requirements of demonstrating the techniques involved. I am enclosing a letter of recommendation from my former Commander at the West Hollywood Sheriffs Station. It was my initial intent to join the Temecula Police Department Volunteer Program, but when I initially sought to join, I was advised that I would be required to perform duties that would require long hours of standing outside. Unfortunately, I could not meet that requirement. I know I can be a valuable asset to the City Manager's Office in serving in an advisory role and thank you in advance for your consideration. Best, Bradley 3. liven, D.C. 611111111 of stir. Attllt•les !�lirriWa Orpartmrnt Iirabquarters r '1i1.111 Ramona Cuulruarb � 1 antrrru Ifark. California 9171.1-116L1 (310)855-8850 April 27, 2009 Temecula Police Department Attn. Volunteer Program Coordinator P O Box 892050 Temecula. California 92589-2050 Dear Volunteer Program Coordinator It is my pleasure to provide a letter of recommendation for Mr. Brad Sullivan. He has been a Civilian Volunteer at the West Hollywood Sheriffs Station since May 2003. Mr Sullivan has donated over one thousand, nine hundred hours to our program He has provided assistance for our volunteers on patrol class,working the station front desk and answering non-emergency telephone calls participating in the C E R T program and many other assignments His active participation commitment and willingness to give his personal time to the Volunteer Program is greatly appreciated During his time with our program. Mr Sullivan has proven to be a fast learner regarding policies and procedures followed at our station. He understands both the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. His interest in teaching is a natural next step for his personal growth. Law Enforcement has a huge customer service and social service component to it, and Mr Sullivan excels at both of these. The West Hollywood Sheriff's Station is fortunate to have had Mr Sullivan serve with our volunteers. On behalf of the personnel at West Hollywood Sheriffs Station,we sincerely appreciate the time Mr Sullivan donated to the Civilian Volunteer Program If you have any questions. please contact me or Volunteer Coordinator, Sergeant James Farrell or Deputy Jon Klaus at Sincerely. LEROYP BACA, SH RIFF dy Goldman, Captain ommander. West Hollywood"ff sAtat onf BRADLEY J. SULLIVAN, D.C. CURRICULUM VITAE RE: Bradley J. Sullivan, D.C. D.O.B. 8-17-1955 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: Cleveland Chiropractic College- Los Angeles, California Graduated: (Cum Laude) December 1983 Degree: Doctor of Chiropractic Preceptorship: Cleveland Chiropractic Clinic, Los Angeles 1983-1984 D.C. License: Wyoming# 427 July 28, 1984 California# 16549 January 11, 1985 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: American Chiropractic Association California Chiropractic Association Los Angeles County Chiropractic Association (1983-1993) Delta Tau Alpha Chiropractic Honor Fraternity- Theta Chapter PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Cleveland Chiropractic College(Afternoon Session) Class Of 1983 President 1982-1983 Delta Tau Alpha Honor Society - Theta Chapter President 1985-1986 Vice President, Los Angeles Southeast Chiropractic Society 1986-1987 President, Los Angeles Southeast Chiropractic Society 1984-1987 Chairman, California Chiropractic Association College Liaison Program 1986-1987 Membership Chairman, Los Angeles County Chiropractic Association 1987-1988 Appointed Member, California Chiropractic Association, Medical Cartel Advisory Committee. 1987-1988 Treasurer, California Chiropractic Association 1988-1989 2nd Vice President, California Chiropractic Association 1989-1990 Vice President of Communications, California Chiropractic Association 1990-1991 1 st Vice President, Los Angeles County Chiropractic Society Professional Activities continued Page Two Curriculum Vitae Bradley J. Sullivan, D.C. 1991-1992 Vice President of External Affairs,California Chiropractic Association. 1992-1993 Vice President of External Affairs, California Chiropractic Association. 1993-1994 President, California Chiropractic Association 1994 -1995 Immediate Past President,California Chiropractic Association. 1994 -1996 Chairman, Chiropractic Services, Medex, Worker's Compensation HCO 1995-1996 Vice President, San Fernando Valley Chiropractic Society 1996-1998 President, Cleveland Chiropractic College Alumni Association 1996-2002 Member, CA Chiropractic Assoc. Board of Directors(termed out) 1996-2009 Examiner,National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Part 4 1996-2002 Director, California Chiropractic Association, San Fernando District 1998-2004 Chair, California Chiropractic Association Managed Care Committee 2000-2004 Chair, California Chiropractic Association By-laws Committee 2001-2004 Chair, California Chiropractic Association Insurance and Managed Care Dept. alternate Delegate American Chiropractic Association, So. California 2002-2011 Member, American Chiropractic Association Managed Care Comm. 2005-2006 Member, American Chiropractic Association Coding Committee 2006-presentDelegate, American Chiropractic Association, So. CA 2009-2010 Chair, California Chiropractic Political Action Committee 2010-present Vice-Chair Chiropractic Political Action Committee. 2005-2011 Director for SFVCD 2011-2012 Chair, CCA Department of Insurance PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION: 1985 & 1986 Outstanding New D.C. -Los Angeles Southeast Chiropractic Society 1985 California Chiropractic Association Presidential Recognition Award 1986 Biographical Subject in 16th Edition of Who's Who in California 1990 C.C.A. Certified in Disability Evaluation 1990 C.C.A. Certified Independent Disability Examiner 1993 State Appointed Chiropractic Qualified Medical Examiner. 1991 Botterman Award, L.A. County Chiropractic Society 1994 Doctor of the Year, San Fernando Chiropractic Society 1994 Doctor of the Year, California Chiropractic Association 1995 Doctor of the Year, Consumer Business Review 1995 San Fernando Society Distinguished Service Award 1996 San Fernando Society Distinguished Service Award 1997 California Chiropractic Association Distinguished Service Award 1999 San Fernando Chiropractic District, Doctor of the Year Award 1999 Doctor of the Year, Cleveland Chiropractic College Alumni Assoc. L.A. 2000/2001 Doctor of the Year, San Fernando Valley Chiropractic District 2002 Doctor of the Year, San Fernando Valley Chiropractic District 2002 Doctor of the Year, California Chiropractic Association Page Three Curriculum Vitae Bradley J. Sullivan, D.C. PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION CONTINUED: 2002 Presidential Award, California Chiropractic Association 2003 Distinguished Service Award, San Fernando Valley Chiropractic District 2003 California Chiropractic Association, Betty& Charlie Adams Lifetime Achievement Award 2005 California Chiropractic Association, Distinguished Service Award 2008 California Chiropractic Presidential Award 2009 California Chiropractic Presidential Award 2010 California Chiropractic Presidential Award 2011 California Chiropractic Association Doctor of the Year Award PUBLISHED ARTICLESANSTRUCTION/LECTURES: Over 20 published articles in the California Chiropractic Journal on topics ranging from the role of the doctor of chiropractic in managed care to chiropractic legislative activities 1985-2000 American Chiropractic Association Journal-Role of California Chiropractic Association in directing National Chiropractic Policies(published February 1994) Clevelander Newsletter(Cleveland Chiropractic College Newsletter)Spring 1994,published article on Critical Issues Facing Chiropractic in the Future. Lectured, Interns, Cleveland Chiropractic College on Disability Evaluation 1990, 1991 and 1992. Lectured 6th'Perm students, Cleveland Chiropractic College on Chiropractic Jurisprudence, 1992, 1993, 1994. Lectured Interns, Los Angeles College of Chiropractic on Chiropractic Jurisprudence 1992, 1993. Lectured Interns, Los Angeles College of Chiropractic on Evaluation, Diagnosis and Chiropractic Management of Low Back Pain and Cervical Pain, 1994. Postgraduate instructor,Cleveland Chiropractic College-Los Angeles preceptor program 1997-1998 1999, 2001, 2003 Commencement Speaker Cleveland Chiropractic College Graduation 2005-2011 Contributing author to the Annual A.C.A. Coding Solutions Manual Page Four Curriculum Vitae Bradley J. Sullivan,D.0 COMMUMITY ACTIVTTIIES• 1994-1995 Treasurer 9005 Cynthia HOA 1995-1997 President, 9005 Cynthia HOA 1994-2007 Member, West Hollywood Democratic Club 1994- 2001 Commissioner, City of West Hollywood, Public Safety (chair 1997-98, vice-chair 1.999-2001,chair 2000-2001) 1995 Certified, CA Office of Emergency Services Volunteer Management/Organization 1995-1998 Co-Instructor with Deputies R. Pena& B. Patrick, Red Cross CPR& I"Aid 1995-1997 Liaison for New Fire Station##7 Project 1995-1996 Public Safety Liaison to Sunset Specific Plan- West Hollywood 1995-1996 Economic Planning Committee, City of West Hollywood 1996 SEMS (Standardized Emergency Management System) Training 1996 Disaster Size Up and Reporting Training 1996 Red Cross Shelter Management 1 & 2 1996 Disaster Management of Immunosuppressed Victims 1996 Emergency Operations Training and Drill 1996 Light Search and Rescue& Size up 1996 Disaster Psychology and De-Briefing 1995-1998 Chair, West Hollywood Disaster Volunteer Corp. 2000-2001 Chair, West Hollywood Disaster Volunteer Corp./CERT Team 1996-1997 Member, West Hollywood Pedestrian Safety Committee 2001 Graduate, Federal Emergency Management Agency Academy, MD 1997-2001 F.EM.A. Certified Instructor, Community Emergency Response Team First Aid, Disaster Medical Response Coordination, Triage, City of West Hollywood 2000 F.E.M.A/CERT Instructor, Crescents Valley Sheriffs Station, STEP 2000 2003 F.E.M.A./CERT Instructor, Star Center Sheriff's Academy, Explorer Cadet Class 2002-2003 Treasurer, Villa Las Brisas Homeowner's Association 2001-07 CERT/Disaster PreparednessVolunteer Lead Instructor,L.A.Sheriffs Dept./Homeland Security/Community Law Enforcement Partnership Program. 2002 Received 500 hour recognition pin from L. A. Sheriff's Dept for volunteer service In 2003 2004-2005 Certified Red Cross Instructor First Aid/CPR/AED 2004-2005 Certified Red Cross Instructor CPR/AED for the professional responder 2.004-2005 Certified Red Cross Instructor Title 22 2004-2008 President, Villa Las Brisas Homeowner's Association 2005-2007 Cert Train the Trainer Instructor for the CA Regional Community Police Institute 2007- Volunteer, L.A. Sheriffs Dept, West Hollywood Station 2008- Graduate,L.A.S.D. Volunteers on Patrol Academy Page Five Curriculum Vitae Bradley J. Sullivan, D.0 2008 Awarded 2000 hour pin from L.A.S.D. 2009-2010 Secretary, Wolf Creek HOA(1800 homes) present President, Wolf Creek HOA (1800 homes) 2010-present Wolf Creek Community Neighborhood watch coordinator. COMMUNITY RECOGNITION: 1995 City of West Hollywood, Leadership Award 1996 City of West Hollywood, Outstanding Contribution to Public Safety Award 1997 City of West Hollywood, Disaster Volunteer of the Year Award 1998 City of West Hollywood, Commendation for service during transformer explosion emergency. 1998 County of Los Angeles, Certificate of Appreciation for service during transformer Explosion emergency. 1999 City of West Hollywood, Commendation for service as C.E.R.T. Instructor 2000 City of West Hollywood, Disaster Volunteer of the Year 2004 Presidential Gold Level Service Award from President George W. Bush for Community Service through volunteer activities with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Community Law Enforcement Partnership Program, Office of Homeland Security. Rev. 09/16 City of Temer F-1 Board and Commission 1'< , 41000 Main Street - Temecula, CA 92590 5Ep Q 7 2 ,appointment Application 1989 www.cityottemecula.org L (951) 694-6444 C,1TI' GLIEKKKO For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. The original completed application must be received by the deadline. Please check one: ❑Planning ❑Community Services ❑—v Public Traffic Safety ©Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 13 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes NAME: Juliet Grossman OCCUPATION: Realtor-, Marketing Consultant ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZI DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: Caldwell Banker; Grossman Law Firm EMPLOYER ADDRESS:32675 Temecula Pkwy EMAI Educational Background/Degrees: J.D-(Law),Loyola Law school,Los Angeles,CA (1994) B.A.(English),UCLA,Los Angeles,CA (1991) List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: none List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): See attached State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) See attached I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public Information purposes. Signature: Date: 915116 f Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Juli r m n Organizations Realtor, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage (Temecula-Vail Ranch) • 32675 Temecula Parkway, Temecula CA 92592 The Grossman Law Firm A.P.C. • Temecula office: 43537 Ridge Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 • Shareholder/Co-owner, 2001-present • My husband Scott and I own a small practice focusing on trust and probate litigation with offices in Riverside, Temecula, and San Diego. I am currently a marketing consultant to the firm. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce • Affiliate member, 2015 to present • Temecula Trekker graduate, September, 2016 class Friends of Temecula Library • Member, 2015 to present National Charity League, Inc., Temecula Valley Chapter • President, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 • Founding board member, President-Elect and Treasurer, 2013-2015 Hillcrest Academy • Member of Competitive Academics Program and co-director of Odyssey of the Mind program, supervising five coaches of three student teams, 2015-present • Member of marketing committee (appointed by Board of Trustees), 2013-2014 Girl Scouts of San Gorgonio Council • Southwest Region, Temecula Service Unit Events Coordinator, 2013-2014 • Brownie troop co-leader, 2013-2014 • Junior troop leader, 2011-2012 Destination Imagination • Reality Rally Kidz Checkpoint Challenges organizer, 2014 and 2015 • Coach, Paloma Elementary School/Temecula Middle School team, 2010-2012 Rady Children's Hospital Auxiliary, Temecula Unit • Founding board member and Treasurer, 2005-2007 Juliet Grossman MOMS Club of Temecula-Central • President, 2009-2010, Treasurer, 2008-2009 Junior League of Riverside • Sustaining member, 2000-present • Fundraising Director, 2005-2007, Membership Director, 2001-2003 Friends and family know me as the "Temecula Answer Lady" because I am their go-to person for information about what is going on in our community. I am passionate about Temecula, and enjoy sharing my enthusiasm for our city whenever I can. As a Commissioner I can take that dedication further. Shortly after my husband, Scott, and I moved here in 2003, l applied for a position on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and I have continued to strive for a seat on this commission ever since. I remain extremely interested in issues of traffic, roads, and other civic public safety issues and want to make a contribution to helping maintain the excellent quality of life we enjoy here in Temecula. Over the past three years, I helped create a Temecula Valley Chapter of National Charity League. NCL is a membership organization of mothers and daughters in grades 7-12. During the six year program, we stave to fulfill the mission of strengthening the mother-daughter bond in a philanthropic organization through community service, leadership development, and cultural activities. Temecula's leaders approach all that happens here with careful thought, planning, and foresight, and I know my background as a collaborative board member and networker with various diverse local organizations makes me a highly qualified Commission candidate. Perhaps the most valuable lesson I've learned from my past board experience is to remain inquisitive, always be learning, and approach the work of the board with an open mind.These attributes would make me an excellent Commissioner. Thank you for considering me for an appointment to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. I would be happy to provide additional personal and professional references upon request. City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street ZJ=GE111 - Temecula,CA 92590 Appointment Application www.cityof#emecula.org -, isss (951)694-6444 �v EP_ _ 0 G 26 iol CA= C1 =MKS 011111114 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted.The original completed application must be received by the deadline. []Please check aommunity Planning Services [2fpublic Traffic Safety []Old Town Local Review Board Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? NAME: L4R /-I ciL OCCUPATION: AD ' CITY/STATEMP DAYTIME PHONE: VENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: 'ser EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: /?G,?-/�jGyl List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 0�4-r34,4we r-r-f IZ7—'q 54:A'Zr"5 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) 1 understand that any or all information on this form may be verified.l consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: ^ Date: VPleas r rete to: 1ty of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main treat, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Larry R. Metz To Whom It May Concern: As a resident of Temecula since February 2002, 1 have seen the outstanding growth of this city. Temecula is my home and I have been privileged to live here the past 14 years. 1 am now developing temeculagolftrail.com, a website that will attract groups of Golfer's from all over the nation to Temecula to play golf and enjoy the wonders of our City. As a small business owner i have had several businesses and offices in Temecula. My Primary business has been Suncoast Marketing which is a Manufacturers Rep firm representing Major Consumer Electronics firms. I have called on Major Retailers including,Wal-Mart,Costco,Target and BestBuy. I have also called on Pechanga Resort and Casino selling their retail gift shops. I have owned a restaurant delivery service called We Just Deliver,from 2006 to 2009.We employed up to 11 drivers and delivered for 30 of the local restaurants. After 4 years we sold to our competitors Dine-In Delivery. After Senior Management positions at Emerson Radio, Packard Bell Electronics and Panasonic, I decided to venture out on my own and started Conquest Marketing Group, Inc.to represent Manufacturers who wanted to sell to the Major Retail Chains, Buying Groups and Distributors. I have been self-employed since 1992. 1 have a great deal of knowledge in regard to building businesses,contracts, negotiating skills and working with all levels of people,from senior management to floor sales people. I believe that I would be an asset to the planning commission board. Larry Metz Larry R.Metz Current- Owner Temecula Golf Trail—In development. TemeculaGolffrail.com is a new online site that offers Golfers from all over the country Tee times, Hotel reservations,and Tours for Golf outings to the Temecula area. (Currently in development) (Also SanDiegoGolffrails.com and Socalgolftrail.com) 1992-Present—President of my own manufacturer's rep company. Originally Conquest Marketing Group, Inc and now called Suncoast Marketing. Selling to major retailers, including Wal-Mart, Sam's Club, Costco,Target, and BestBuy, also Distributors and Buying Groups on a national basis. Consulting to and representing Audiovox,RCA, Emerson, Energizer, Kinfine-USA, Concept Green Energy Solutions. 1990-1992—Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing,EMERSON Computer Corp. I was recruited to run Emerson's new Computer Division that I took from zero to over 200 million dollars in sales in less then 18 months. EMERSON bought out my contract when they asked me to move to New Jersey and I chose not to accept. 1983-1990—Executive Vice President,Packard Bell Electronics. I purchased the name Packard Bell from Teledyne for$90,000 for three partners. I took the company from zero to over$650 million dollars in sales. Packard Bell owned 42%market share for the retail computer category. Responsible for all Sales,Marketing and Operations. 1980-1982--President Filmway's Audio Group. I was originally hired to run Filmway's Audio Concepts a high-end Audio retailer catering to the recording and broadcast industry. After successfully turning that profitable they asked me to run two other companies Filmway's Audio and RF Wireless Rents. Eventually they made me president of all 5 companies in their Audio Group and after turning them profitable,I helped negotiate the sale of these companies. 1974-1979--S. California Sales Manager,Panasonic Inc. I controlled sales for 12 divisions of Panasonic,including Technics, Video,Audio,Microwaves,Vacuums, Batteries,and even Bicycles. Took the territory from.$1 million to over$10 million. Prior employment, Edwards of California, Christian Dior Menswear and American Airlines. Personal—Divorced,three grown children. Avid Golfer, Temecula resident since 2002. President Chatsworth Youth Sports 1977-1980 Commissioner Valley Conference Youth Basketball 1981 Commissioner Golfer's Getaway 2006 to Present Education—NY State University at Farmingdale 1962-64 American Airlines Management Training programl966-1967 November 12. 2015 To Whom it May Concern: I am writing a letter of recommendation on behalf of my longtime friend and business associate lir. Larry Mete _ Larry and ! began working together more than;20,years ago and have maintained an even greaser friendship at the same time. I have always appreciated Larry's ability to communicate well even in extreme environments such as the large retail market_ His professionalism has always made it possible in all our business ventures to succeed_ His biggest attribute may be his integrity and respect for making sure projects were completed as promised. Larry's keen ability with follow up and follow thru skills made his career in our industry a great success. I believe Larry Metz would be a great asset to the City of Temecula and possibly improve the abilities of others to build better bridges of communication%orithin your community. Best of luck as l Know Lam,would be a great addition to your teary. Best regards, Mike Churchman Sr_ Vice President Emerson Radio Corp EMERSON RADIO CORP. 3 UNIVERSITY PLAZA #405 HACKE ISACK, NEW JERSEY 07061 073.428.2000 Y1i 7 Y kit �Afir November 9, 2015 Temecula City Planning Commission Re: Larry Metz To Whom It May Concern: I have been asked to provide a letter of reference for a good friend Larry Metz. I have known Larry Metz for approximately 10 years and have found him to be a man of great moral character and honesty. One of Larry's many strengths is his ability to work with others in problem solving issues between parties. He is a very kind individual who always believes in fairness between people demonstrating great communication skills. He has many friends which is a testament to his success in life and being someone we have great respect for. It has been a pleasure to be associated with Larry Metz. I would highly recommend him as a member of the Temecula City Planning Department. Sincerely, Tom Bardos CEO Western Computer Western Computer 351 Candelaria Road • Oxnard,California 93030 (805)581-5020 www.westerncomputer.com i SLP Enterprises Steven L Pad ett Thursday, November 12, 15 City of Temecula Planning Commission To whom it may concern: This letter should serve as letter of reference (both professional and personal) for Mr. Larry R Metz who is seeking to fill an open position on the City of Temecula Planning Commission. I have known and worked with Larry for over 40 years. In many situations we were peers and in many He was my supervisor. In that period of time we have become close personal friends as well. Larry would make a good candidate for your position for some of the following reasons: ❖ Never ending work ethic ❖ Works well with other professionals ❖ Good organizer ❖ Excellent and professional sales person ❖ Completely honest with uncompromising principals. I hope this letter will help you make a favorable decision for Larry to fill the position you have available.You could not do better. Respectfully, Steven L Padgett Robert Vassallo November 8,2015 To whom it may concern; I have been friends with Mr. Metz for over 50 years. I am certain he will be an asset to the planning commission as he is a personable, logical and intelligent individual. His past successes can attest to this. I know he is :tiappy and proud to be a resident of Temecula and would work hard for the future of your city. Robert E Vassallo Sent from my Whone 11/8/2015 Gmail-RE:Reccomendation for opening on the Temecula City Punning Commission GAm I Larry Metz RE: Reccomendation for opening on the Temecula City Planning Commission 1 message Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:01 PM Tc: "Metz, Larry" To whom it may concem, I have known Larry R. Metz for many, many years. We first met in the 5th grade in 1953. We have remained good friends over the years. Larry has always had an excellent rapport with people of all ages. His excellent communication skills allow him to connect with all kinds of people. He is one I can recommend with complete confidence and I know that he will measure up to your expectations. In summary, I highly recommend Larri for any position or endeavor that he may seek to pursue. He would be a tremendous asset to any organization. Sincerely, Peter R. Thorsen 1/ 11/12/2015 Gmail-City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available-Closes 11/20/2015 --- A Larry Metz City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available - Closes 11/20/2015 DAN VUICICH Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:04 PM To: Larry Metz I have known Larry Metz both personally and professionally for 30 plus years. Two words immediately come to mind-Integrity and perseverance. I have witnessed Larry grow companies against the toughest odds and succeed only to shoulder the burden of others shortcomings. The relationships he has gained in the CE world are legion and very loyal. From computers, peripherals, audio products, furniture and video products Larry has blazed the trail with unique offerings and creative procedures. But far and away where Larry has shined beyond most human capabilities is with his family. He has faced down incredible odds and brought his family through. I know his family very well and all are people you would love to know and would enhance your lives. They arrived at this place only by the love and strength of Larry. Obviously Larry's attributes would make him an excellent commissioner. Dan Vuicich From: Larry Metz Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 5:11 PM To:John Spinelli; Mike Churchman; Pete Thorsen;John Gentleman; Steve Padgett; Dan Vuicich; Robert Vassallo;Tom Bardos Subject: Fwd: City of Temecula Planning Commission Position Available-Closes 11/20/2015 [Quoted text hidden] 1/1 ti>' i :' r ��a _� �i`1� ,.µ City of Temecula Board and Commission 41000 Main Street w° Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment Application 1989 www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula And a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula ' It the time the applica tA submitted„ The original completed application must be received by the'deadline, SEP Please check one: ❑Planning OCommunity Services ✓OPublic Traffic Safety Id Town Local Review'Board!-"°' „r Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 8 Are you a City Registered Voter? yes NAME: John S. Locke OCCUPATION: Doctor ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: same EMPLOYER NAME: Corona Temecula Orthopedic Medical Group EMPLOYER ADDRESS:28078 Baxter Rd, Murrieta, CA EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: B.S.Chemistry California State University East Bay 1986 M.D.Uniformed Services University 1991 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons, Riverside County Medical Association Rancho Community Church,Liga Flying Doctors(Mexico Medical Volunteers) List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): none State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of Recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) See attached sheet I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature:_ Date: Z Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Corona-Temecula Orthqpqed'ic Associates M E D I C A L G R O U P G.Carleton Wallace,M.D. General Orthopaedic Surgery September 8, 2016 Total Joint Replacement p Arthroscopic Surgery Richard L.Rouhe,M.D. General Orthopaedic Surgery Total Joint Replacement Sports Medicine I would like to be considered for a position on either the community services or public and Bradley L.Baum,M.D. traffic safety commissions. I have been a resident of Temecula for 8 years. Prior to that I General Orthopaedic Surgery was in the U.S.Navy, stationed in various places from Oakland, 29 Palms and Camp Foot a Ankle Disorders Total Joint Replacement Pendleton, California and Portsmouth, Virginia. Sports Medicine Arthroscopic Surgery Ghassan S.Tooma,M.D. I'. was born and raised in northern.California(,l-layward), a suburb in the San Francisco Bay General Orthopaestic Surgery Area that was growing quickly. I saw what,can happen when community se'rv'ices are Band It int Rr Extremity Surgery planned for and also saw what happens when the are not. M career in the Navy lasted 25 Total Joint Reptacemea�t pp y y �° Sports Medicine years and retired as a Navy Captain (Medical Corps)three years ago. In addition to being a Industrial Injuries doctor, I served,as a department head and chaired several committees such as process Mario r,Luna,M.D. Orthopaeeitc Spine Surgeon improvement, ethics, and moral, welfare and:recreation(MWR). These experiences taught Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery me the value of proactive planning, communication and teamwork. Amy Starry,D.0. General Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Medicine Temecula is clearly a wonderful place with a great future. I feel I am uniquely qualified to Shoulder Surgery be a member of a commission for several reasons. My degree in science will allow me to Jahn Lake,M.D. look at issues involving community services and public safety, traffic flow, code General Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Medicine enforcement, recreation programs, and economic development with a scientific, fact based Shoulder Surgery focus. In addition, my 25 years in the military and medicine gave me a breadth of Reza Roghani,M.D. experiences, working with a variety of people,paperwork and issues. General Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Medicine Shoulder&Elbow Surgery Total Joint Replacement In regards to community services, I see a need for additional partnering and coordination Demetrio Quismorio,Jr.,PA-C With our faith based organizations and service clubs. There are lots of people who want to Orthopaedic Physician Assistant improve the community and may just need a few resources or direction. Having 4 kids and Steven M.Hinojos,PA-C talking with Temecula residents,there is a need for a tennis complex. As a doctor, I see the Orthopaedic Physician Assistant need for improving public safety every day. Improving education, safer drivers, child safety Da-Thao Neria,PA-C issues, accident prevention, emergency response times and disaster preparedness are some Orthopaedic Physician Assistant of the issues I would emphasize. My experiences have given me the background and foresight. Now, I have the time and desire to be a part of and contribute to the great future of Temecula. If you have any questions, I can be reached at or Thank you for your time. John S. Locke M.D. 341 Magnolia Avenue,Suite 101•Corona, California 92879• Telephone: (951) 735-6060•Fax: (951) 735-4510 28078 Baxter Road,Suite 330•Murrieta, California 92563•Telephone: (951)677-2157•www.CTOAMG.corn Item No . 11 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager (Sr CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Receive and File Preliminary Design Concepts for Founders Square and a Memorial in Honor of Jimmy Moore PREPARED BY: Erica Russo, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and File Preliminary Design Concepts for Founders Square and a Memorial in Honor of Jimmy Moore. BACKGROUND: At its meeting on August 9, 2016, City Council directed staff to bring forward a proposal to create a suitable memorial in the Civic Center Plaza in honor of City father Jimmy Moore. Additionally, Council discussed that the Plaza area be re-named "Founders Square" with the intent to provide opportunities to honor other notable individuals in the City's history. Accordingly, staff has prepared multiple concepts with artist's renderings depicting various memorial options and locations. This presentation was previewed by the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Director of Community Services prior to being presented to the Community Services Commission on September 12, 2016. Four members of Commission previewed the Founders Square design concepts: Vice-Chair Willis, and Commissioners Borgeson, Levine, and Nelson. (Chairman Schwank was absent due to illness.) All four appreciated the proposal and believed Council would "love" the concepts, and commented favorably on the ramp-timeline concept, the overall aesthetic, the incorporation of historical and biographical information, and the location of the individual elements. There was one design element that received unanimous constructive criticism: the memorial design incorporating an American flag with Jimmy's face on the canton. The Commissioners felt that this was too literal an appropriation of the flag. This original concept has been included in the PowerPoint presentation because it did receive positive feedback from others. However, there is also an alternative design that keeps many of the same elements while addressing this concern. In addition, the Commissioners offered individual feedback: • Nelson — "Awesome...loved inspirational quote" • Levine— "Loved the background/narrative on the design approach" • Borgeson — "Appreciated design flow...would prefer signs rather than plaques on the retaining walls" • Willis — "Wanted to ensure security measures for the area and flexibility for future additions" All feedback received on draft versions has been incorporated into the design concepts contained in the current presentation being made to City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: 1. TCSD Commission Action Minutes from September 12, 2016 2. Founders Square PowerPoint Presentation ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chair Schwank FLAG SALUTE: Eric Willis ROLL CALL: Borgeson, Levine, Nelson, Schwank, Willis Note: After the roll call, Chair Schwank excused himself from the meeting due to illness. Vice Chair Willis conducted the meeting PRESENTATIONS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None DIVISION REPORTS Recreation, Special Events and Human Services — Report by Erica Russo Cultural Arts— Report by Bea Barnett Park Maintenance/Facility Update CONSENT CALENDAR 1. MINUTES 1.1 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the August 8, 2016 Commission meeting. Motion by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Borgeson to approve the minutes of the August 8, 2016 Commission Action Minutes. Motion approved 3-1-1. Voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Borgeson, Nelson and Willis. Chair Schwank was absent. Commissioner Levine abstained due to absence at the August meeting. 2. PREVIEW OF CONCEPTS FOR A MEMORIAL IN HONOR OF JIMMY MOORE 2.1 Receive and file. Presentation by Erica Russo, Sr. Management Analyst COMMISSION BUSINESS NONE. DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Levine, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to adjourn to the regular meeting to be held on Monday, October 10, 2016 at 6:OOpm at the Temecula Civic Center Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Motion approved 4-0-1. Voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Borgeson, Levine, Nelson and Willis. Commissioner Schwank was absent. The meeting was adjourned at 7:17 p.m. Eric Willis Kevin Hawkins Vice Chair Director of Community Services Alk The Heart of Southern Californ�a Wine Country A LIFE OF SERVICEN COMMEMORATING THE LEGACY OF JIMMY MOORE Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country A Celebration of Life Alk IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . Wine Country Key themes from Jimmy's Celebration of Life: "Father of Temecula" Led the City's incorporation efforts Lifelong teacher and lifelong learner Truly a "man for others" s Patron of the arts and talented musician A committed patriot and decorated Veteran, awarded the Bronze Star and Gallantry Cross Raised by an immigrant grandfather who became a successful entrepreneur; "American Dream" values of discipline and hard work Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country Reflections from City Council �� IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . Wine Country RAS-� " None of these kids 7V:AN�-°CEA V'S ARENA E today knows Jimmy but� = they enjoy a piece of legacyhis every - Mayor Naggar Alk IN MEMORIAM The Haag of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country "The power of one, was two . Jimmy and Peg were a leadership unit. Every TVUSD student should know the history of Temecula's `Founding Parents'." - Mayor Pro-Tern Edwards i Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country "We were so fortunate to be blessed by early leaders with great vision and wisdom who laid the foundation for our City." - Council Member Comerchero Alk IN MEMORIAM The Haag of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country "It's rare that you can tell where a community's foundation is . . .Any one of Jimmy's accomplishments is a legacy event. The question I ask myself is, ` Do I have the stamina to achieve even half of what Jimmy did ?"' - Council Member Rahn Alk IN MEMORIAM The Haag of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country "Every time a kid goes to a park, every parade someone watches, that was Jimmy. . . I 'd like to see a bench somewhere in the City where people could remember him ." - Council Member McCracken Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country KEY ELEMENTS : Founders Square And Jimmy Moore Memorial Alk IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . Wine Country Key Elements per City Council: "Founders Square" area in front of Civic Center (All) Capacity to honor other City figures in the future (All) Specific memorial dedicated to Jimmy Moore (All) Artist rendering of Jimmy in Chambers speaker's well (Comerchero) Honor Military Service (Comerchero, McCracken) History of Temecula (Edwards) Legacy of service to community (Naggar) �- Scope of achievements (Rahn) Chair or bench, poem Hero Unaware (McCracken) .. , , , . .. , . Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country Founders Square Design Concepts Alk IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California FoUNDERS SQUARE Wine Country r 406 fir, "`' .'� �.• `� * . ... -sft IL i I4 r ' • J►.+J t , f IN MEMORIAM FOUNDERS SQUARE she Heart Of SOLithern California Wine Country AND DEDICATED MEMORIALS c1 • '� 4 24U sqh 350 9Q{t j` l ' r FOUNDERS SQUARE • Z Potential location for future memorials �lT 1 _ d 1+ ��Pfir',�� F_ryr}µ !�1[•'� �J .. .a,T�'^" �, Fl�i_'�S! 1 •; i-fL in+.� x r Exp ep Alk IN MEMORIAMThe Heart of Southern California A CITY REMEMBERS . . . Wine Country "Me-Moore-ial" Design Concepts Alk IN MEMORIAM CONCEPT: . " ME - MOORE- IAL"' Wine Country B3!ffi �O'1D '.•:�� Gid/!! $d�d�! Of�O'� _ 5 ��;� Fr` Timeline of Temecula"s history Begins at bottom of ramp, from Founders SquareEnds at top, with memorial j i R Iff�G!p}, options l��.. a.IL ��C I4� fy• `.� � '� r Nei G " Accessible �rrr x Integrated into existing r , Publicarch itectu re/a esthetics Echoes of Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library ►��►,1►`� ►`t►.1►tet ►,��►.t►�/ 1, Alk r i � IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California CONCEPT: WALKWAY ' MEMORIAL PLACEMENT OPTIONS: Planter bed at top (bench and/or monument Continue path to base of American .7 r ' r N ' A • [77III r 1 > r y .� �. �.'•'M1 ,111 7 yl Yf -ems . 9 wI'. �`: ►-ter�►-� � ��►�►��►tea ►�j►:a►.ter ��`w �►��►,�►�� ,;+ ►��►,��►�� ►tea►��►-! ��', ri } f l I J '4 Mir �I �i } L At ,1yMQ0$E 1�•��,� � ;Rm�4L.1�i 9 � 0�P�iewm7u�-:a.� .s7ili E 1 h _� �—a', �� I,s' �► 'i a '�'sem's`IE" � � �� \� �� %1 l�'+i�1 i 9 - tlS9ir rte. � �•� y, 74 ,kw �� _— ,� ."� Anja -! ! •,r1S .r �, 1.�� - ._. i S L.. i .� � III t' d•, • � ' �sl5f • � • P J R � �-, �� i• _..��----�_ *x t �_—Ie�1�iFi■ A il��"st�i � �� r AD 0 0, 0,70 nil li—llp—,1 17, *,Y. nil all a wr4ta. J�9 {yV 1..bL,i,.[p,.�i --7 A MI f 1 ` t �sF 3� �r ! ll �� a 3 �i�✓�Vii� I .t ' `ll�I■ _- !,.MAR Alk IN MEMORIAM sh ALTERNATE CONCEPT: GRANITE MONUMENT e Heart of 5°"thern California Wine Country FEATURES: Engraved image Name & Dates "Father of Temecula" Room for biography - Located at base of American flag on center pole - Could wrap inset timeline pavers A from top of ramp ;s+ r y. Alk IN MEMORIAM C( CONCEPT: REMEMBRANCE BENCH The"earl of Southern California Wine Country FEATURES: 0. Located at top of Timeline ramp Continue path to base of ` � American Flag �, � � �n "air�r !'1!'11111! E dlfliUtlllt` ^ ;r =. 1r � Supports various bench J7 configurations I i 4 iw.lis May include granite monument Echoes concepts of service and F � Y presence, Heroes Unaware poem 4f May be engraved ies du+ir KUT •rte. o 7 �'T CII. le r lY y7/�A 11�_ i� 1 e., ��, • • • n7 � R�•,r ` 1� . . • • ' . • • PC vP �k'r +�,'�'•^'.�- �4�' �E1S`�'Ggl�i`&-�y`: "'�i "�tr - ' !14VO►.4 ON04►tet 10►PC! / I , 11 s ej) 'e 3 .'� � -'•. K��l ..n � �lj i� .lit.'�/-:�� Jr ,/"�11r fJ [J. �..., � f�.Y..6.:9, "�:A'� '�r`d.� ,�A F �:•1�yi,� f ,r. 7:i; :�P!x sl ._.,! a :.i�.;,r. :.l t,, �•�. `,.. YI.- I,r,�/ A ,. �,.. a j ' � � ''�'•' ` e,° '6.ti` �h �,, -= .;jc dr �.,t � s _ i v�S' ,r •39G1' �� . t(�5 f 1� � j' e ! � i,;•. r' ��`, ��qqt�`A'• r^ i ,' � �fk �y r �� r e•_.f � I �� r�' ` , �S'F f,E_: •�� _r � �j if na r �.- i. 't � r6 �° rf � '7'n 1 fiy�j'��(e�':� � � f '•; it 1 i • S r � u s .y X- • • • • • • • • syn ,�� +' ti Alk IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California BEYOND O U N D E R S SQUARE . . Wine Country Other opportunities to integrate Jimmy's legacy into the City's narrative: 1. Rename Mercedes Street in honor of Jimmy Moore 2. Self-guided walking tour map/itinerary leading from Founders Square through Old Town, concluding at Jimmy's Memorial 3. Development of an interactive app or kiosk at the Temecula Valley Museum 4. Integration into coloring book/story development with the Temecula Valley Museum s. Commission an artist's rendering of Jimmy in the speakers well in Chambers per Council Member Comerchero recommendation Alk IN MEMORIAM The Heart of Southern California A MAN REMEMBERED . . 0 Wine Country "Look beyond what is to what could be, and do everything you can to bring it about." 44a T r rr a i r. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Item No . 12 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly-Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the highlights for the Community Development Department for the month of August 2016. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases: In August, Planning received 16 new applications, including 3 pre-applications,and conducted 2 Public Hearings. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Old Town Boutique Hotel: On February 18, 2016, staff received an application for a Development Plan to construct a five-story 155,630 square foot hotel.The 151 room hotel will extend the entire length of 3rd Street between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes. A six-story parking structure for hotel valet parking will be located directly across 3rd Street.Amenities include restaurant and retail space, meeting and banquet rooms, and a pool. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report will be prepared by ESA. (JONES) Audi Dealership: On February 18, 2015, staff received a pre- application for a 37,000 square foot Audi dealership to be located on Temecula Center Drive, adjacent to 1-15 and south of the existing Mercedes-Benz of Temecula dealership. A Development Plan application was filed for the project on April 6, 2015. A community meeting was held with the Harveston community on March 25, 2015 and approximately 20 Harveston residents attended the meeting and were positive about the addition of the Audi dealership to the community. A Supplemental EIR was prepared was available for public review from July 20, through September 8,2015. A second community meeting was held with Harveston residents on August 13,2015,to discuss the findings of the Supplemental EIR. The Planning Commission approved Audi on October 21, 2015. Construction began on April 26, 2016, and is anticipated to be completed in March 2017. (FISK) Temecula Gateway: On November 3, 2014, staff received applications related to the proposed Temecula Gateway project. The proposed project will consist of a Planned Development Overlay/Zone Change and General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation to Community Commercial and the zoning designation to Planned Development Overlay 14, a Tentative Parcel Map to allow for the creation of seven lots from four, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of four commercial buildings totaling approximately 23,666 square feet, a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an automobile service station with a corresponding carwash and convenience store that will serve alcohol, a Conditional Use Permit to allow fora drive-thru for a restaurant. The City has entered into an agreement with Michael Baker International to conduct an Environmental Impact Report. The Draft EIR has been circulated and comments have been received. The Final EIR with response to comments is being prepared. Staff is anticipating an October 5, 2016 Planning Commission hearing and December 2016 City Council hearing date. (JONES) Cypress Ridge: On December 21, 2015, staff received applications Development Plan to construct 245 market rate residential units in the form of duplex, triplex, attached and detached cluster units.The project will be located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road.Along with the Development Plan are applications for a Tentative Tract Map (for condo purposes), a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay, and a General Plan Amendment.A fiscal impact analysis(FIA) is currently underway.The applicant is also proposing to upgrade Pala Park to include amenities and play equipment for special needs. (JONES) Altair Specific Plan: On November 12, 2013, City Council approved an Entitlement Processing Agreement with Ambient Communities (Developer)to process extensive land use entitlements for the 270 acre property located west of Old Town including General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Subdivision Maps, Development Agreement, and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Ambient Communities is proposing a mixed-use development comprised of residential single-family and multi-family units, as well as retail/commercial, open space, and institutional uses. Staff is currently reviewing a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Report and has prepared an Initial Study. The City entered into an agreement with Environmental Science Associates in July 2014 to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a scoping meeting was held on December 3,,2014. Keyser Marston Associates has prepared a fiscal impact analysis for the project. Staff is working through environmental issues associated with the MSHCP and wildlife corridors and negotiating a Development Agreement. A Draft EIR was circulated, and the comment period ended on June 17, 2016. A Planning Commission workshop was held on June 6, 2016, and a City Council Workshop was held on July 28, 2016. Staff was directed to work with the Endangered Habitat League, and wildlife agencies to further address adjacent wildlife corridors and mountain lion movement. Another City Council workshop is anticipated within 30 days. (PETERS) Temecula Creek Inn (TCI)Specific Plan: On February 23, 2016, the City Council approved a contract with Michael Baker Incorporated (formerly RBF)to complete an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for a proposed Specific Plan at the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course and Resort. JC Resorts proposed a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Plan for a hotel expansion. This project also includes a Fiscal Impact Analysis to evaluate the project's potential impacts on the City's General Fund. Since 2008, the Developer has modified the site plan and project description to address concerns regarding site layout, number of units, traffic impacts, cultural resources, potential Development Agreement, and timing of the hotel expansion. As a result of the changes, City Staff requested the applicant to complete a pre- application to make a final determination on the site plan and project description. Pre-application number PR15-1239 resulted in a revised final project description to include 385 single family dwelling units, reducing the current 27-hole golf course to an 18-hole golf course resort, and community on 305 acres located on Rainbow Canyon Road. The Specific Plan proposes four Planning Areas: Planning Area 1 includes an expansion of the existing hotel by 99 rooms from 128 to 227 guest rooms, and the addition of a spa and banquet facilities totaling 153,837 square feet. Planning Areas 2-4 accommodate the 385 single family homes. Planning Area 5 consists of the golf course. Staff is reviewing a draft fiscal impact analysis.A Draft EIR is anticipated to be circulated during Fall 2016. (PETERS) LONG RANGE PLANNING Uptown Temecula Specific Plan: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, south of Cherry Street, and east of Diaz Road. The Specific Plan is based upon the eight visioning recommendations of the community and as directed by the Jefferson Corridor Ad Hoc Subcommittee. The Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council along with the certification of the Final EIR on November 17, 2015. Staff is developing the scope of work for the Request for Proposal for the Streetscape Beautification Plan for the Specific Plan area. On August 30, 2016, staff hosted a workshop for local brokers on the requirements of the Specific Plan. (WEST) SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY&AFFORDABLE HOUSING Town Square Marketplace: On January 13, 2015, City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement(ENA)with Truax Development(Truax) to negotiate the disposition and development of the two, currently Successor Agency owned, vacant lots in front of the Civic Center,flanking the Town Square Park on the north and south sides of Main Street. On June 23, 2015, City Council extended the term of the ENA for an additional six months. While both Truax Development and the City have been negotiating in good faith,the complexities of the project require the ENA be extended to allow for the completion of additional work. Upon agreeing to terms, the City and Truax envision drafting a disposition and development agreement that will be brought back before the Council for approval. The second amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement was approved by City Council on March 8th to extend the term of the agreement. (WATSON) Affordable Housing RFP: The Supportive Housing Subcommittee,formerly Council Members Naggar and Washington, directed staff to issue an RFP to solicit project proposals from interested developers for the construction of an affordable housing development. In late 2015, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance on the remaining affordable housing dollars that had been previously"frozen"within the Affordable Housing Fund, gaining discretion on $12.4 million of affordable housing funds. In conjunction with the current Supportive Housing Subcommittee, now consisting of Mayor Naggar and Council Member McCracken, staff issued an RFP to solicit development proposals that address one or more of the following housing needs: seniors, veterans, special needs, transitional, or supportive. The RFP includes potential City-owned parcels that can be considered for development, but proposals will not be limited to City-owned properties. Uptown Temecula is also encouraged with the recently adopted Specific Plan. Projects are encouraged to integrate a mix of uses, as well as market-rate units into projects. The RFP closed on May 16th and the City received 20 proposals from interested developers. Keyser Marston Associates, who assisted in the development of the pro forma templates utilized in the RFP, assisted staff in the review and analysis of the proposals. Staff will present the proposals to the Supportive Housing Subcommittee in Fall 2016 before scheduling interviews with potential developers. KMA will also prepare interview questions and participate in the developer interviews. (WATSON, LEHNER) Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule: As part of the ongoing wind-down of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Successor Agency(SARDA) is required to complete a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) outlining the financial and debt obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency. Based on the outstanding obligations that are due in the six month period being reviewed, SARDA makes requests from the Property Tax Trust Fund to make the appropriate payments. On March 2, 2015, the Oversight Board resolution approving ROPS 15-16A was delivered to the California State Department of Finance, the California State Controller, and the Riverside County Auditor Controller per the requirements of the redevelopment dissolution legislation. The ROPS 15-16B was approved by the SARDA Oversight Board in September 2015. The ROPS 2016-17 was approved by both the SARDA Board and the Oversight Board in January. The 2016-17 Annual Budget was approved on June 22, 2016. (WATSON, LEHNER) Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinance: The City Council adopted the 2014-2021 General Plan Housing Element Update on January 28,2014, and the City received certification from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on March 10, 2014. A project processing schedule has been prepared for the Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinances as required by Programs 1 and 4 of the Housing Element. The Code Amendment will also encompass land use updates as required by Program 3. The project is in the initial planning phase. Staff is currently conducting research and anticipates completing the ordinances for adoption in 2017. (WEST) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CDBG Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing: Every five years, the City, as an Entitlement City, is required to prepare an updated Consolidated Plan (ConPlan)and Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The ConPlan and AFH process is designed to help states and local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing and community development needs and market conditions. The City entered into an agreementwith MDG Associates on January 26, 2016 for preparation of the ConPlan. As a part of the ConPlan process, the City must update the Citizen Participation Plan (CPP). Its purpose is to provide Temecula residents with an understanding of their role in housing and community development activities in Temecula. The CPP was adopted by City Council at a public hearing on June 28, 2016. In addition to the introduction of the Assessment of Fair Housing at the June 28, 2016 public hearing, three public workshops were held in conjunction with this process—two on June 29, 2016, and a third on July 30, 2016.A survey was created to assess resident and stakeholder input regarding fair housing. The public had the opportunity to review the AFH for 30 days from August 27 through September 27, 2016. The Assessment of Fair Housing is due to HUD on October 4, 2016 or no later than 270 days prior to the implementation of the 2017—2022 Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan is due to HUD May 17, 2017 and becomes effective July 1, 2017 and will cover through June 30, 2022. (LEHNER) CDBG Administration: The City will receive$515,688 in CDBG grant funding for Fiscal Year 2016-17. Staff held two community and technical workshops for applicants on December 7,2015.The application period for the 2016-17 fiscal year was open from December 1 through December 17, 2015. Staff reviewed 14 applications for eligibility and presented them to the Finance Subcommittee for recommendations on February 9, 2016. City Council approved the Annual Action Plan on April 26, 2016 and staff submitted the plan to HUD. Funding will be allocated as detailed below. (LEHNER) City of Temecula CDBG Funding Recommendations FY 2016-17 CDBG Public Service Programs Organization Program Name Recommendation Fair Housing Council Comprehensive Fair Housing Program $16,810 Assistance League of Temecula Valley Operation School Bell $8,283 Safe Alternatives for Everyone(SAFE) Creating Safe Families $8,283 Senior Citizens Service Center Emergency Food/Temp.Assistance $8,283 VNW Circle of Care Circle of Care Food Ministry $8,283 TEAM Evangelical Assistance Ministries Temecula Community Pantry $8,283 Community Mission of Hope Inclement Weat her Shelt er $8,283 Michelle's Place Breast Health Assistance Program $8,283 Canine Support Teams,Inc. Service Dogs for the Disabled $2,556 Subtotal Public Service Program Funds Recommended $77,350 CDBG Housing Activities and Public Facilities Projects Organization Program Name Recommendation Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs $25,000 City of Temecula Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground $64,681 City of Temecula Rotary Park Rehabilit at ion $25,000 City of Temecula Old Town Sidewalk Rehabilitation $220,520 City of Temecula Temecula Community Center Rehab backup Subtotal Public Facilities and Housing Activities Funds Recommended $335,201 CDBG Administrative Costs City of Temecula Administration $103,137 Subtotal Administration Costs Recommended $103,137 TOTAL 2016-17 CDBG RECOMMENDED ALLOCATION $515,688 ENERGY & CONSERVATION Temecula Energy Efficiency Management (TEEM) Fund: The TEEM Fund is a self-sustaining fund that utilizes rebate incentives while also re-directing annual utility cost savings from energy efficiency projects into the fund. City Council established the fund in June 2013, with an initial deposit of$119,728.90 in SCE and SCG rebates. As energy efficiency projects are completed, rebates are deposited into the fund for future energy efficiency project. The current fund balance is now$196,797.00. Staff worked with Public Financial Management, funded through the Western Riverside Energy Partnership, to develop a policy manual for the TEEM Fund, focusing on policies and methodologies to determine utility. (WEST) Western Riverside Energy Leadership Partnership: This Partnership, consisting of eleven Western Riverside Council of Government(WRCOG) member cities, Southern California Edison (SCE), and Southern California Gas (SCG), provides incentives for participants to develop energy efficiency programs. Staff completed a comprehensive energy audit of the Temecula Library with assistance from the Partnership. The audit identified 9 energy efficiency measures which could save an estimated 107,429 kWh annually, equating to an estimated annual cost savings of$17,278. If all efficiency measures are implemented, the City would receive approximately$20,952 in rebate incentives. Implementing these measures would allow the City to achieve Platinum Level in the Partnership kWh savings requirements, giving the City higher rebate incentives for future energy efficiency measures. Staff is working with NRG EV Services to install an electric vehicle charging station in the 6th Street Parking Lot. The fast charging station will complement the existing electric vehicle charging stations in the 6th Street Parking Lot and the Civic Center Parking Garage, by adding fast charging capabilities allowing drivers to add 50 miles of range in 15 minutes. (WEST) Solid Waste and Recycling Program: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City, CR&R, and their customers. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year for residents to dispose of household waste and large miscellaneous items that do not fit into the standard residential trash receptacle. The event is open to City of Temecula residents only. Staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection events and the Backyard Composting Workshops. The next Citywide Clean-up is scheduled for October 29, 2016 at Chaparral High School from 8:00 AM —2:00 PM. (WEST) BUILDING & SAFETY Front Desk/Counter Activity: During the month of August, the Front Desk/Counter received 995 visitors to the C-Desk. Of these visits, 34 were for Home Occupations issued. Inspections: For the month of August, Building and Safety conducted 1,720 inspections. On average,there were 74.78 inspections per day or 18.69 inspections per day, per inspector. Permits: During the month of August, Building and Safety issued 313 building permits. Of these permits: 15 were new single family; 17 multi-family units; 72 were photovoltaic permits; 23 were Tenant Improvements with C of O's; and 27 were Non-Construction C of O's. Tenant Improvements Pieology—26460 Ynez Road Urbane Cafe —40688 Winchester Road Nash Dental Laboratory—27232 Via Industria U.S. Milk—28381 Vincent Moraga Non-Construction Certificate of Occupancy Crepe Vine Cafe —28601 Old Town Front Street Comprehensive Autism Center—26720 Ynez Court CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of August, Code Enforcement responded to 130 web complaints. In addition, the division opened 87 code cases and forwarded 30 referrals to Public Works, Police, Animal Control, and Fire. Code Enforcement assisted 25 people at the Community Development Counter. Detailed Code Enforcement case activity can be found in the following chart: TYPE OF CODE CASE TYPE TOTAL Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 1 Vacant Home/ Property Maintenance/ Rodent/ Mold 23 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 11 Trash and Debris/ Dumping 4 Overgrown Vegetation /Weeds/ Fire Hazard 9 Green Pool/Vector Control 6 Graffiti 5 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 3 Trailer/ RV Stored/Boat/Parking 8 Construction w/o Permit/Building Code 6 Encroach Public ROW/Trash Cans 6 Other/Homeless Encampment 1 Signs Pulled -Violations 3 Public Safety& Health 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES 87 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of activities in Temecula. Residential Foreclosure Tracking March April May June July August 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 DEFAULT 83 86 78 82 80 82 FORECLOSED 68 70 66 62 63 64 REO 81 76 70 58 62 61 TOTALS 1 232 1 232 1 214 1 202 1 205 1 207 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking March April May June July August 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 DEFAULT 2 1 1 1 0 0 FORECLOSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 REO 9 11 11 11 11 12 TOTALS 11 12 12 12 11 12 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1083 08/01/2016 Nabil Akkoub (951)775-8449 Plan Review Case Title/Description: ALFA Ice Cream(Home Occupation) PA16-1085 957-580-036 Jaime Cardenas 08/01/2016 08/01/2016 Jenna Fay Approved Case Title/Description: Baby Breez(Home Occupation) PA16-1087 919-021-003 Jaime Cardenas 08/02/2016 08/02/2016 James Feddema Approved Case Title/Description: James Feddema(Home Occupation) PA16-1088 921-060-032 Scott Cooper 08/02/2016 09/07/2016 Claudio Sposito (951)676-1629 David Phares Approved Case Title/Description: Sposito's Live Entertainment CUP:A Conditional Use Permit for Sposito's Italian Bakery&Cafe to add indoor live entertainment consisting of salsa and italian music at 28120 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 207 PA16-1095 953-533-017 Jaime Cardenas 08/03/2016 08/03/2016 Kenneth Kindt Approved Case Title/Description: Mobile to You, LLC(Home Occupation) PA16-1096 921-421-011 Brandon Rabidou 08/03/2016 08/03/2016 Romeo Savant Approved Case Title/Description: Multi Media Savant(Home Occupation) PA16-1097 921-800-022 Scott Cooper 08/03/2016 Patrick Andersen (714)381-3732 All About Plan Review Storage Case Title/Description: All About Storage MOD:A Major Modification for the construction of a 64,144 square-foot, 3 story, self storage building located at an existing self storage facility at 27577 Commerce Center Drive. Previous Pre-App is PR16-0349 PA16-1103 965-370-021 Jaime Cardenas 08/04/2016 08/04/2016 Ralph Hubbell II Approved Case Title/Description: Hubbell Consulting(Home Occupation) PA16-1105 959-423-071 Jaime Cardenas 08/04/2016 08/04/2016 Valentina Perez Approved Case Title/Description: Valentina Perez(Home Occupation) PA16-1107 960-072-012 Jaime Cardenas 08/04/2016 08/04/2016 Kreg Ferris Approved Case Title/Description: Kid Hip Children's Music(Home Occupation) Page 1 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1110 Jaime Cardenas 08/05/2016 08/05/2016 Alice Juarez (951)225-5399 Approved Case Title/Description: Alice Juarez's Inspections(Home Occupation) PA16-1111 909-270-057 James Atkins 08/05/2016 08/05/2016 Jamie Poladian (949)833-1140 SUSAN Approved STEELE Case Title/Description: Adv Auto Parts MOD: a Minor Modification(Planning Review Only)to allow for the addition of two(2)new doors on the exterior facade. The site is located at 41630 Winchester Road. PA16-1114 962-092-010 Jaime Cardenas 08/08/2016 08/08/2016 Nathan Watkins Approved Case Title/Description: Oasis Management Guys Pool Service(Home Occupation) PA16-1117 922-033-021 Eric Jones 08/08/2016 Dave Madden DWT OTT Plan Review Case Title/Description: 4th and Front Minor Modification:A Minor Modification(Planning Review Only)to allow for a revision to the building foot print and revise several windows on the structure. The project is located at 28588 Old Town Front Street. PA 16-1118 962-280-025 Jaime Cardenas 08/08/2016 08/08/2016 Garrett Gronlund (509)760-0842 Approved Case Title/Description: The WoodnWeld(Home Occupation) PA 16-1119 961-142-020 Jaime Cardenas 08/08/2016 08/09/2016 Andrea Prather Approved Case Title/Description: A+Auntie's(Home Occupation) PA16-1122 962-181-015 Jaime Cardenas 08/09/2016 08/09/2016 Thressia Approved (Theresa) Samuels Case Title/Description: Future Impression Enterprises(Home Occupation) PA16-1124 921-060-018 James Atkins 08/09/2016 False Front Plan Review Case Title/Description: Islander TUP: a Minor Temporary Use Permit to allow for Islander by Design to conduct a two(2)day sales event for Saturday,August 20th and Sunday,August 21st. Hours for the event will be 10:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m. each day. The site is located at 28011 Jefferson Avenue. PA16-1126 957-291-030 Jaime Cardenas 08/10/2016 08/11/2016 PAUL VALENCIA Approved Case Title/Description: Vineyard Wealth Advisory LLC(Home Occupation) Page 2 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1127 962-580-077 Jaime Cardenas 08/10/2016 08/10/2016 John (951)265-2945 Approved Cunningham Case Title/Description: Sparkling Clear Pool Care(Home Occupation) PA 16-1131 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 08/11/2016 08/17/2016 Patrice Christy (800)344-2944 TEMECULA Completed ext 3402 TOWNE CENTER ASSOC Case Title/Description: A Zoning Verification letter for the property with the adrees of 40820 Winchester. PA16-1134 959-070-018 Jaime Cardenas 08/11/2016 Karin Rancho Plan Review Raubenheimer Community Reformed Church Case Title/Description: A Major Temporary Use Permit for a pumpkin and Christmas tree lot to include inflatable amusements as well as retail sales of seasonal festive items.The project is located at 31300 Rancho Community Way. Halloween activities will be conducted between October 1 through 31 and Christmas activities between November 22 through December 23, 2016. -ABC Tree Farms PA16-1136 910-320-037 James Atkins 08/11/2016 barry blake PNK Investments (310)428-4977 PNK INV& Plan Review and Management MANAGEMEN LLC T Case Title/Description: Pieology MOD: a Minor Modification(Planning Review Only)to change exterior colors of the existing building located at 26460 Ynez Road/ PA16-1137 921-462-005 Jaime Cardenas 08/11/2016 08/11/2016 Karen Hellman Approved Case Title/Description: KH Travel Experience, LLC(Home Occupation) PA16-1138 965-361-020 Jaime Cardenas 08/11/2016 08/11/2016 LETICIA Del Approved MORAL Case Title/Description: Leticia Del Mora, Psy.D. LEP,ABSNP(Home Occupation) PA16-1140 955-284-006 08/12/2016 William Macadam Plan Review Case Title/Description: MacAdam Enterprises PA16-1142 954-271-004 Jaime Cardenas 08/15/2016 08/15/2016 Dominique Approved Estrada Case Title/Description: Estrada Business Services Page 3 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1143 910-282-011 Jaime Cardenas 08/15/2016 08/19/2016 Victoria Scarth Approved Case Title/Description: Temecula Mediation LLC(Home Occupation) PA16-1149 921-771-007 Jaime Cardenas 08/16/2016 08/16/2016 Wendy Campora Approved Case Title/Description: Mark&Wendy Campora Enterprises(Home Occupation) PA16-1150 959-080-033 Scott Cooper 08/16/2016 09/07/2016 Bridge Housing Bridge Housing (949)622-5510 Summerhouse Approved Corporation Corporation Housing 3, L.P. Case Title/Description: Madera Vista Construction Landscaping-"Summerhouse 111" PA16-1154 910-310-012 Scott Cooper 08/17/2016 Ed Carter (951)457-1612 M &J RAMSAY Plan Review CORP Case Title/Description: Get A Clue Room Escape CUP:A Conditional Use Permit for an escape room, game room, and team building/training to operate at 27420 Jefferson Ave., Suite 104A PA16-1156 921-700-011 Jaime Cardenas 08/17/2016 Amanda Roe (800)344-2944 PK I Plan Review ext 4604 PALOMAR VILLAGE Case Title/Description: A zoning verification letter for 30640 Rancho California Road,AKA 30520-30690 Rancho California Road(APNs: 92-17-00-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -009, -010, -011, -015, -016, -017). PA16-1158 962-092-014 James Atkins 08/18/2016 Noordavid Plan Review Ahmadi Case Title/Description: Al Auto Sales(Home Occupation) PA16-1159 962-410-015 James Atkins 08/18/2016 Armando Tirados Plan Review Case Title/Description: All Valley Auto Sale(Home Occupation) PA16-1161 961-261-024 08/19/2016 Cynthia Plan Review Rodriguez Case Title/Description: Cynthia's Sweet Slices(Home Occupation) PA16-1165 921-452-007 Jaime Cardenas 08/22/2016 Walt Eden (949)874-9170 Walt Eden Cancelled Case Title/Description: Eden-Room Addition Secondary Dwelling Unit:A Secondary Dwelling Unit application that will allow for a 603 square foot secondary dwelling unit located at 42109 Roanoake Street. Page 4 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1169 922-130-017 James Atkins 08/22/2016 09/01/2016 Jeffery (949)933-3918 RANCHO Approved McConnell BAPTIST CHURCH Case Title/Description: Rancho Baptist Church T-Mobile Minor Mod(Planning Review Only):A Minor Modification application to allow for the replacement of existing battery cabinet, installation of three(3) antennas, six(6)diplexers,twelve(12)coax jumper, and new equipment within the existing cabinet.The project is located at 29775 Santiago Road. PA16-1171 919-061-001 08/22/2016 Leslie Kegley (951)775-3204 Plan Review Case Title/Description: Life's Journey's(Home Occupation) PA16-1173 955-421-033 Brandon Rabidou 08/23/2016 08/23/2016 Lorena Magos (760)427-0176 Approved Case Title/Description: P C Solutions(Home Occupation) PA16-1177 944-290-021 Brandon Rabidou 08/23/2016 08/23/2016 Diana Gellentien Approved Case Title/Description: Krazy Nana's(Home Occupation) PA16-1179 920-132-013 Scott Cooper 08/24/2016 09/01/2016 Melinda Utesch Approved Case Title/Description: Momma's Sugar Shack(Home Occupation) PA16-1181 945-260-014 Scott Cooper 08/24/2016 08/24/2016 Vern Walden Approved Case Title/Description: California Tea&Herbal (Home Occupation) PA16-1183 921-270-055 James Atkins 08/25/2016 Alex Prestifilipo Gourmet Italia (951)696-1490 JPM 2004 C2 Plan Review 27471 YNEZ RD Case Title/Description: Gourmet Italia Minor MOD:A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only)for Gourmet Italia to expand their patio, add fencing, and gooseneck lighting. The project is located at 27495 Ynez Road. PA16-1185 918-302-014 James Atkins 08/25/2016 Alexis Plan Review Rubio-Pearson Case Title/Description: 1024 Productions(Home Occupation) PA16-1189 910-351-011 Scott Cooper 08/26/2016 08/26/2016 Sammie Morin Approved Case Title/Description: Aloha Glow(Home Occupation) Page 5 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PA16-1190 909-360-041 James Atkins 08/26/2016 Bruce Steele (951)453-3744 Temecula Plan Review Partners Case Title/Description: Biltwell Products MOD:A Minor Modification(Planning Review Only)for two new exterior emergency exit doors and an ADA ramp located at 42349 Winchester Road. PA 16-1191 Matt Peters 08/29/2016 09/08/2016 Waroonyupa Approved Chaimuang Case Title/Description: Evergreenmaid(Home Occupation) PA16-1193 944-241-028 Jaime Cardenas 08/29/2016 08/29/2016 Ariel Weatherly Approved Case Title/Description: Winsome Words Press(Home Occupation) PA16-1195 959-202-045 Brandon Rabidou 08/30/2016 08/30/2016 Sharissa Bradley (760)468-3512 Approved Case Title/Description: Independence Through Nutrition(Home Occupation) PA16-1196 920-072-007 Jaime Cardenas 08/30/2016 08/30/2016 Shazia Mahmood Approved Case Title/Description: Shazia Mahmood(Home Occupation) PA16-1197 Matt Peters 08/30/2016 09/08/2016 William Nealeigh (951)440-9293 Approved Case Title/Description: William Nealeigh(Home Occupation) PA16-1203 916-371-018 James Atkins 08/31/2016 Steve Whyld (909)465-6839 Kashmere Plan Review Family Trust Case Title/Description: Harveston WC MOD: a Minor Modification to allow for the conversion and expansion of the existing Harveston Welcome Center to a coffee shop and market. The expansion will encompass two phases-Phase I will include an additional 134 square feet of new floor area on the first floor and 12 new parking spaces. Phase II will include 390 square feet of new floor area on the first floor, 1,516 square feet of new stair cases and a 1,428 square foot balcony/deck. The site is located at 40135 Village Road. PREAPP16-110 922-033-012 James Atkins 08/04/2016 Rita Starnes Plan Review 8 Case Title/Description: Fourth Street Antiques: a Pre-Application to consider the modification of the front-yard area of Forth Street Antiques. The modification will allow for the addition of a covered/semi-covered area between the existing building and the street to allow for outdoor storage and retail display of merchandize. The site is located at 41975 4th Street. Page 6 of 7 Assigned Planner Approval Business PA Number Project Name APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Name Phone Owner Status PREAPP16-112 959-050-004 Brandon Rabidou 08/09/2016 Matthew Fagan (951)265-5428 Chakrabarty Plan Review 1 Milan & Manjushree Revoc Trust Case Title/Description: Chakra Development Pre-App:A pre-application for a mixed-use development that includes office retail on 6.18 acres with an assisted living facility on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and DePortola Road PREAPP16-118 922-024-008 James Atkins 08/25/2016 Christopher (951)639-0301 Plan Review 4 Campbell Case Title/Description: Root Beer Bldg MOD: a Pre-Application to discuss the modification to the existing and vacant Root Beer building. The modification will include the addition of a front patio with cover, fencing, a back patio, and retrofit to the existing accessory building. The site is located at Front street and 5th. Page 7 of 7 Item No . 13 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jeffrey Kubel, Chief of Police DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Joseph Greco, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of August 2016. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 3,372 "Priority One" calls for service 51 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 7.27 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours 230 Special Events hours 102 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 836 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 44 Training hours 93 Total Volunteer hours 1178 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops/Neighborhood watch meetings conducted 0/2 Safety presentations/Training 1/0 Special events 7 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 2/1 Businesses visited 0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 2/1 Station Tour 2 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits 3/6 Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed 3,504 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 205 Sets of fingerprints taken 53 Police reports filed 7 Citations signed off 29 Total receipts $3,033 SPECIAL TEAMS (POP/ SET) On sight felony arrests 31 On sight misdemeanor arrests 18 Felony arrest warrants served 7 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 36 Follow-up investigations 25 Parole/Probation Searches 1/17 Pedestrian Checks 79 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks 15 Crime Free Housing Checks 74 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 1161 Grant funded D.U.I. /Traffic safety checkpoints 2 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 D.U.I. Arrests 18 Non-hazardous citations 499 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 63 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations 113 Parking citations 251 School Zone 119 Seatbelts 7 Cell Phone Cites 65 Injury collisions 31 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 258 Total Cases Assigned 64 Total Cases Closed 41 Search Warrants Served 4 Arrests 7 Out of Custody Filings 2 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 496 Felony arrest/filings 3 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 22 Traffic Citations 4 Fingerprints/Livescans 262 Total receipts $9,815 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 0 Misdemeanor arrests 6 Reports 9 Youth counseled 104 Meetings 61 Item No . 14 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. City of 9emecuCa DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PROJECT NAME TOTAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION PROJECT ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES COST CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Citywide Slurry Seal for Arterial Streets $658,750 • On June 14, 2016, City Council awarded a Slurry arterial streets (Winchester, Jefferson, and Construction Contract to Pavement Coatings Temecula Parkway) with the goal to prolong their Co. useful life and avoid much more costly roadway • Construction will begin upon approval of rehabilitation measures Traffic Control Plans Interstate-15/ State Route 79 South $50,646,123 • Processing project approvals through Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Caltrans Construction of ramp system that will improve • The selection process for a Construction access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway/ Management firm is currently underway State Route 79 South Pavement Rehabilitation Program — $213,000 • On August 9, 2016, City Council awarded a Overland Drive Construction Contract to Haitbrink Asphalt Rehabilitation of Overland Drive from Jefferson Paving, Inc. Avenue to Commerce Center Drive • Construction will begin upon approval of Traffic Control Plans Pavement Rehabilitation Program — $395,000 • On May 24, 2016, City Council awarded a Temecula Parkway (Bedford Court to Construction Contract to Pavement Coatings Pechanga Parkway), PW12-13 Co. Rehabilitation and improvement of pavement • Anticipate completion by end of September conditions pursuant to the Citywide Pavement 2016 Rehabilitation Program Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 $5,000,000 • City Council approved a Professional Widening of Pechanga Parkway between Via Services Agreement for the Design and the Gilberto to North Casino Drive Environmental Document at their meeting on April 26, 2016 •A design alternative has been selected and the completion of Design Plans is anticipated to be at the end of 2016 Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road $92,000 • On June 14, 2016, City Council awarded a Signal Construction Contract to Los Angeles Traffic Provides for the design and construction of Signal Transportation modifications by providing designated left run • Construction is pending due to a 12-14 week movements from Roripaugh Road onto lead time for manufacturing of the signal Winchester Road poles City ®f 9emecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PROJECT NAME TOTAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION PROJECT ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES COST CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 $2,764,093 • Construction began March 28, 2016 Design and construction of a park and ride facility in the vicinity of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street PARKS & RECREATION PROJECTS: Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground $648,888 • Notice to Proceed with Design and Enhancement, PW12-20 Fabrication was issued on June 9, 2015 Design and construct a new innovative play area to • Anticipate completion of design plans replace the existing equipment January 2017 • An agreement for construction will be executed at a later date City ®f'1'emecuCa DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PROJECT NAME TOTAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION PROJECT ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES COST MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Playground Equipment Enhancement and $275,000 • Priority list and replacement program are Safety Surfacing being prepared Replace aging play structures and associated . Reviewed RFQ Proposals and selected two safety surfacing companies to provide detailed layouts for two parks (Pala Community Park and Nicolas Road Park) Replace Rusted Decks on Playground $30,471.15 • Replacement of all rusted decks. Project Equipment at Temeku Hills Park completion date is September 15, 2016 Replace rusted decks Earl Stanley Gardner Middle School $15,300.00 • Crack sealing, court resurfacing, sealing Tennis Court and paint lines. Project completion date is Tennis court resurfacing October 1, 2016 Patricia Birdsall Field Turf Renovation $12,400.00 • Field de-compaction and grooming, and replace penalty kick area on all four fields. Field de-compaction and grooming Project completion date is October 6, 2016 PROJECT NAME ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES BRIEF DESCRIPTION LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS DePortola Professional Building . The sewer main and required water main realignment Located at the corner of DePortola Road and Margarita is complete Road . Edison installed a new line on DePortola Road Murrieta Creek Restoration Project . Creek restoration continues with the placement of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County additional BMP protection and the establishment of Flood Control and Water Conservation District the cement stabilization plant • Creek soil cement sidewall construction continues Terracina . Demolition and reconstruction of the median to add a Standard Pacific Housing Development in County right turn pocket onto Faxon Lane off Redhawk Parkway is underway REQUESTS TO SPEAK City Council Meeting 09/27/16 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA J 1989 Date: I wish to speak on: 1 Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/CSD( /SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ��a i d��>�A19�J�S� W� 0`1 tvv\4 P ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk RLLgE to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for thel record. Name: v\ Addres Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please gi the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA luxe Date: I wish to speak on: � ❑ Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/ SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: E^ Agenda Item No.` ` � For F Against F Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Name: 1NQ 1 CtC�ASSY W Fli-Q/�#�(��1b If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. �� REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: z I wish to speak on: ® Public Comme CITY COUNCIL/)--SD /SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: P �)C, �r Dpi `ocn'u. - � 7 Agenda Item No. J! For 1:1 Against Z loo oq'-�' Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and;tate your name for the record. Name: c Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: —N-e- �4try��cti Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA G Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment CITY COUNC / CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) 24bject. Agenda Item No. For 1:1 Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the rre-c�orrd.� Name: ice, ��l �� If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: _ Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 0o�� Date: d I wish to speak on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/ SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: El Agenda Item No. _� For F-1 Against El Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: /C� �I�' '✓' K 7�Y C, 'tom a E' Address: one Number: If you are representing a�n((organizati n or group, please give the name: (2 C t/Jc,,.� L l Z Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 �j n � � Date: / a I wish to speak on: CommenntTY COIJNCI SD /SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject/: l /� Is Y Agenda Item No. .� For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for"Pe record. Address: -, '� /� Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: 4an Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: I wish to speak on: 0/ Public Comment Y CO CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ( /� Agenda Item No. _� For Ea Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record.,( ;an Carol i Name: �•Q�r [ /i(�17 �'`z rf I' Address: = Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 9 Date: I wish to speak on: ❑ Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk REigr to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk gEl2[ to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: K19yn1,oA)D tJ f{A) 5W,( ) Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. �� REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Dater.- e e 7 �2 7, ao l I wish to speak on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For x Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium an sate your me for the record. Names �ti err 2(t �° & Phone Number. If you are an organization or group, please give the name: G � Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional, REQUEST TO SPEAK r CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: T7 I wish to sp k on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA THA/TPFA (Circle One) i\� Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state yo r name for the record. Name: ' Address: Y Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA ,9s9 Date: Z- �o I wish to speak on: ❑ Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA(Circle One) Subject: ❑X Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium nnannnd state your name for the record. Name: (Ylarveh Address: Phone Number ; If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: �✓114nf1 /�.-n�'p- �It.MG /TI�I G.n�,2 Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK /' CITY OF TEMECULA `� � 1989 Date: I wish to speak on: ublic Comment C OUNCIL/ CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA (Circle One) Subject: Z- r 6 L� --5— E] Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and /state o/ur/"ham�fe�for the/record. Name: Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.