Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout080994 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD AUGUST 9. 1994- 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council. will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-24 Resolution: No, 94-80 Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Reverend George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of Praise Councilmember Birdsall BirdSall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs Proclamation - "Temecula Volunteer Firefighters Week" A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item no~; listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of July 19, 1994; 2~2 Approve the minutes of July 26, 1994. Resolution AoorovinQ List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Reoort as of June 30, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1994. 5 6 7 9 FY 1995-99 Capital Imorovement Prooram RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1994-95 Out-of-State Travel Rans RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. Community Service Fundine Loan Criteria RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Review and approve the Community Services Loan Program criteria. Council Suooort for SB 302 - Graffiti Abatement RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached letter to local legislators on behalf of the Council and in support of SB 302 - Graffiti Abatement. Contract ChanQe Order No. 2 for Project No, PW93-12, Solana Way Street Imorovements RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 with Yeager Construction Company, Inc. increasing the contract amount $43,855.00to widen the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way. 9.2 Transfer $43,855.00from the Development Impact Fund/Traffic Signal Mitigation and appropriate in Capital Projects Account No. 210-165-651-5804. 10 Award of Contract for the Construction of an Interim Traffic Sional at Winchester (Hwv. 79N) and Nicolas Roads. Project No. PW93-11 11 12 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award a contract for the construction of an interim traffic signal on Winchester (Hwy. 79N) and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11 to Paul Gardner Corporation for $64,822.00and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,482.20 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 10.3 Authorize payment to the State of California for an encroachment permit fee in the amount of $10,500.00. Award of Professional Services Contracts for Civil Enaineerina to NBS/LOwrv for Project No. PW93-09. Parkview Site RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Award Professional Services Contractors to provide services for the design of the Parkview Site and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the following contract: NBS/Lowry for civil engineering and land surveying services in the amount of $19,945.00 with a $1,994.50( 10 %) contingency amount. 11.2 Approve an operating transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund in the amount of $21,939.50 (including 10% contingency), and appropriate $21,939.50in the Capital Improvement Fund for the design of the Parkview Site, Project Number PW93-09. Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts 22715- 1 and 22716-1) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS 22715-1 AND 22716-1 ) 13 ReDetitive Plan Review Compensation RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve an appropriation in the amount of $105,140 to Account No. 001 -162-999- 5248 for repetitive plan review performed by VanDorpe Chou Associates and the Esgil Corporation during fiscal years 1992-1993, and 1994. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 14 Second ReadinQ of Ordinance No. 94-23 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348, 92-16 AND 93-12 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 15 PlanninQ AoD lication No. PA94-0022, Soecific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4. Paloma Del Sol RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 94- 0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4, PALOMA DEL SOL, LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD. EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4; LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STATE ROAD 16 Variance No. 10 - A Fifty-Five (55) Foot Hioh Freeway Oriented Siqn for Creekside Texaco RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve Variance No. 10 with no additional requirement for extensions of time; OR 16.2 Approve Variance No. 10 for a specific period of time. COUNCIL BUSINESS 17 Plannine Commission Anoointments RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Appoint two members to serve a full three-year term on the Planning Commission. 18 Community Services Fundine Reoresentative RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Appoint a Council representative to assist the Finance Officer and Community Services Director in reviewing the CommUnity Service Funding Program applications. 19 Prooosed Keep Temecula Clean "Adoot-A-Street" Proeram RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Approve the Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program. 20 Temecula Town Association Assistance RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Consider providing a loan of $68,000to the Temecula Town Association based on a "Value-In-Use" Appraisal. 21 DiSD0Sal of Surplus EouiDment and SuDOlies RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT THROUGH DONATION TO CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS OR CITY-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 22 Consideration of Financial SUPPOrt for the Economic Development Corporation RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Consider the level of funding for the Economic Development Corporation. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: August 23, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. TEMECULA'COMMUNITY SERVICES 'DISTRICT MEETING - (To 'be held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record, CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 26, 1994. 2 Amendment to the Construction Contract with Martin J. Jaska for Construction of Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-03CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve Amendment No. 1, revising the Construction Contract with Martin J. Jaska for the Construction of Pale Community Park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, by reducing the scope of work and cost associated with completing this work to an amount not to exceed $1,714,500.00. 2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 9171,450.00,which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Contract Chanae Order No. 2, Sports Park Slooe Reeair, Proiect No. PW93-06CSD RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for the Sports Park Slope Repair, Project No. PW93-06.CSD, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of 977,977.00. 3.2 Transfer 972,482.54from TCSD Fund Balance and appropriate this amount to the Capital Improvement Fund. 3 4 Award of Construction Contract for Long Valley Wash - Channel ReDair, PW94-06CSD RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Award a contract for the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, PW94-06CSD, to Trautwein Construction for $31,000.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract. 4.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the co. ntingency amount of $3,100.00, which is ~qual to 10% of the contract amount. 4.3 Transfer $15,397.00from TCSD Fund Balance in Service Level C and appropriate this amount to the Capital Improvement Fund. 5 Acceotance of the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Proiect No. PW92-29B RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Accept the Community Recreation Center - Phase 11, Project No. PW92-029B, as complete. 5.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount). 5.3 Direct the City Clerk to release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed to that date. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting August 23, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecuta, California. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 26, 1994. 2 Chamber of Commerce Aereement RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the FY 1994-95 agreement with the Chamber of Commerce to provide services and authorize the Executive Director to execute the contract. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: August 23, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WI~REAS, the City of Temecula is served by a highly skilled and dedicated team of officers and firetighten, and WHEREAS, the officers and the men and women serving the Temecula Fire Depaxtment are supported and augmented by an equally dedicated and well-trained group of volunteer firefighters; and WHF~REAS, these faithful individuals are citizens who give unselfishly of their time and talents, senring without compensation; and WHEREAS, the volunteer firefighters are further supported in their efforts by an active auxiliary, known as the Temecula Firebirds, who work unceasingly to raise funds which axe used toward the purchase of additional equipment to support the volunteer firefighters; and WHEREAS, without the contributions of all of these committed men and women, the high level of protection, currently afforded our community, might not be possible, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of August 7 - 13, 1994 to be "TEMECULA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS IN WITNESS ~F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of August, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD JULY 19, 1994 A special workshop of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:09 PM at the Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Birdsall informed the Council she had received a call from the organization STOP (Solutions to Traffic Accidents as a Result of Police Pursuits) and said other members of the Council will probably be contacted. She explained this organization is a support group and listed Leticia Landrey and Gerald LaCrosse as contact points at the following number: 1 - 800-999-STOP. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Review of the ProDosed FY 1995-99 Caoital Imorovement Proaram Mary Jane McLarney,. Finance Officer, gave an overview of the various funding sources. She reported this is a planning document for the next five years, however the first year including appropriations. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet discussed circulation, outlining transportation projects. He showed a break-down for transportation projects of $16, 163,203during FY 1994-95. Councilmember Parks asked how many 93-94 projects were rolled over for the next year. Mr. Serlet distributed a handout listing projects and their status. Councilmember Parks stated he feels the Zev Buffman Entertainment Project should not hold up the improvements to the First Street Bridge. Larry Markham, 40175 Winchester, discussed the need for full traffic signalization on Highway 79 South and Bedford Court. He stated the owners have requested that signals, not stop signs, be installed due to the dangerous conditions at this site. Minutes\7\19\94 -1 - 08/04/94 City Council Minutes July 19. 1994 Director of Public Works Tim Serlet suggested the owners install the signal at their expense since the need was generated as a result of their specific use. Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see the First Street Bridge moved up in priority to at least the Number 20 position. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to reorder the i~riority of the First Street Bridge to the position of No. 20. The motion was approved by unanimous consensus. Council consensus was also obtained to start negotiations on the Diaz Road improvements, and to move forward with this project. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 7:10 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 7:26 PM. Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented an overview on Community Services Projects. He divided his presentation into three parts, completed, current projects and new projects that have been added. He reported that seven parks have been dedicated over the past 12 months. Councilmember Birdsall questioned the status of the McDowell site. Director of Community Services Nelson reported this is listed under future projects, due to funding constraints. Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked if funding is not expended on the full development of the Pala Site could it be transferred to the McDowell site. Mr. Nelson explained that $400,000 from that project is already ear-marked for the Temecula Middle School Lighting proiect, however an additional $400,000 could be reallocated. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall to allocated $50,000 for the design of the McDowell site. Councilmember Parks moved to amend the motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, to include $400,000 for McDowell site development. The motion was unanimously approved by Council consensus. Councilmember Birdsall requested that the future park designs include facilities to address the needs of disabled users. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney reviewed the RDA projects. Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels design of the Northwest Sports Complex should be delayed until the final flood control design is known. City Council Minutes July 19. 1994 Councilmember Parks stated he feels the Felix Valdez re-alignment is important and should go through. Director of Public Works Serlet stated this may be redundant if the Western Corridor is implemented. Councilmember Parks questioned the Murrieta Creek improvement which goes through Old Town and stated the City needs to reserve approximately 20 to 25 million dollars for that improvement, Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney concluded with an overview of the 1994-95 activity. City Manager Ron Bradley announced that the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee haved reviewed the RDA projects and recommend that the City Council support this program. Adjournment It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn at 9:14 PM to a meeting on July 26, 1994, 7:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mufioz absent. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes\7\19\94 -3- 08/04/94 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD JULY 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:10 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: . Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Birdsall. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Roberts presented Jessica Madden with an Award of Valor for her quick response in applying the Heimlich maneuver to her friend Kristle Osterhoudt to dislodge an obstruction which was threatening to sufficate her friend. Chief Jim Wright introduced Larry Benson, the new Fire Division Chief for the Temecula area. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Birdsall presented Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson with a picture of the Community Recreation Center and thanked him for his efforts in bringing this project to fruition. Minutes~7\26\94 -1 * 08/01/94 City Council Minutes July 26, 1994 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Item No. 6 from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Roberts removed Item No. 7 from the Consent Calendar because a request to speak on that item was filed with the City Clerk. Councilmember Parks requested clarification on Item No. 8, asking if the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem were the recommended voting delegate and alternate. City Clerk June Greek stated this has been the case in the past. It as moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 8-12. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS; NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts None Stone Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure, RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of June 28, 1994; 2.2 Approve the minutes of July 12, 1994. Minutes\7\26\94 -2- 08/01194 City Council Minutes 3. Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 July 26. 1994 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Mortaaae Credit Certificate Proaram RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEBT LIMIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND TO PERMIT THE ISSUANCE OF MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATES IN LIEU OF QUALIFIED MORTGAGE BONDS General Plan Amendments and Annual Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 94-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING TIMELINES FOR PROCESSING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND HEARING AN ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN REPORT Designation of Votino Deleoate for Annual Leaoue Conference RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Designate the Mayor as voting representative and the Mayor Pro Tern as alternate. Minutes~7\26~94 °3- 08/01/94 City Council Minutes July 26, 1994 10. Records Destruction Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Pelicy. Buildina Lease with Windsor Partners RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Evaluate and approve an agreement with Windsor Partners for extension of existing lease of City Hall Facility. 10.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the lease. 11. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Extendina Benefits to All UnreDresented Employees RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SALARY AND BENEFIT CHANGES TO UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 12. Ordinance NO. 94-22 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 17.12 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING Minutes\7~26~94 -4- 08/01/94 City Council Minutes July 261 1994 Fire Eneine Purchase Councilmember Mu~oz questioned if this is the appropriate type of vehicle to purchase since the majority of emergency calls are not fire-related. Chief Jim Wright responded that because of staffing levels and fire demands, a multi-use vehicle has been chosen so that it may respond to any type of call. Councilmember Parks asked that staff schedule a presentation 'of fire services for another date so that staff will have the opportunity to prepare for such a presentation. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent. Watershed Plannine Councilmember Birdsall stated she has concerns regarding the MOU since State level officials are not given voting rights on the policy committee. Mayor Roberts stated it was his belief that Council approved the MOU in concept with the understanding that State representatives would sit on the Policy Committee as voting members. John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll Drive, representing the Land Owners and Business Advisory Committee, requested that the Council not approve the MOU until such time as State representatives have a voting seat. City Attorney Thorson advised that if the Council approves the MOU, the only way to change it would be an amendment which would have to be approved by all other entities involved. Councilmember Murioz suggested inviting a representative from the Policy Committee to explain why action was taken to place State representatives on the Policy Committee, but not give them voting power. Councilmember Parks expressed concern regarding having four State representatives possibly dominating the Policy Committee and suggested that two be assigned as voting members. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation with the exception of Section 3 that needs to be revised, allowing for Senate and Assembly seats and asking that the City write a letter signed by the Mayor to the Policy Committee requesting that voting be reconsidered and two voting memberships be assigned to State representatives. Minutes\7~26\94 -5- 08/01/94 City Council Minutes July 26, 1994 RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 8:09 PM. The meeting was reconvened following a change of the tape at 8:10 PM. City Attorney Thorson advised that the MOU can either be approved "as is ", or Council must defer approval. Councilmember Parks and Councilmember Birdsall withdrew their motion and second. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue this item to a future meeting and directed staff to invite a member of the policy committee to attend that meeting. It was also moved to direct staff to prepare a letter from the Mayor asking that two (2) voting memberships on the Policy Committee be extended to State representatives. It was further directed that the Mayor is to serve as the City's voting member on the Policy Committee. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tern Stone absent. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 8:15 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:45 PM following the previously scheduled CSD and RDA meetings. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Nuisance Abatement Assessment Lien - Karl S. Hennine Property, 28613 Puiol Street Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks a~ked if the owner had been located. Mr. EImo reported that all attempts to determine the whereabouts of the owner have failed. Mayor Roberrs opened the public hearing at 8:50 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Roberrs closed the public hearing at 8:50 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 13.1 Approve the Notice Qf Nuisance Abatement Assessment Lien as a special . assessment against the real property located at 28613 Pujol Street. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tam Stone absent. Minutes~7\26~94 -6- 08/01/94 City Council Minutes July 26, 1994 RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a brief recess at 8:51 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:54 PM. COUNCIL BUSINESS 14. Ordinance Reaulatina Temporary Sians Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348, 92-16 AND 93-12 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tern Stone absent. 15. Formation of a Disabled Access Reaulation Acoeals Board Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks asked if a selection procedure has been established. Mr. Elmo responded that advertising will be done in the local newspapers and criteria will be put together. City Manager Ron Bradley stated that Council would appoint the appeals board, It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation. It was further directed that input from the City Clerk's office regarding selection procedures be followed. 15.1 Direct staff to solicit interested parties within the City to serve on an appeals board for the purpose of hearing written appeals of decisions of the Building Official in the enforcement of the accessibility regulations of Chapter 31 of the California Building Code. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tern Stone absent. Minutes~7\26\94 -7- 08/0 1/94 City Council Minutes 16. July 26~ 1994 Adootion of Rules of Order for City Council Meetinos City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks questioned the three minute time limit for Council comments. City Attorney Thorson responded that the Council can waive provisions as necessary. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to approved recommendation 16.2 as follows: 16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RULES OF ORDER FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS 17. Plannina Commission ADoointments Mayor Roberts announced he received a request from Mayor Pro Tern Stone to continue this item to the meeting of August 9, 1994. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue this item to the meeting of August 9, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. Minutes\7\26\94 -8- 08/01/94 City Council MinuTes July 26~ 1994 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to adjourn at 9:11 PM to a meeting on August 2, 1994, 6:00 PM, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, 7Femecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tern Stone absent. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes~7~26\94 -9- 08/01194 ITEM 3 RF-~OLUTION NO. 94- A RI~-qOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORIll IN EXltIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: section 1. That the following claims and demands as sct forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same ere hereby allowed in the mount of $751,492.36. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 9th day of August, 1994. ATfE, ST: Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of August, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk Re,~n2S CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/21/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07128194 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 08/09,/~4 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/28/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/09/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 250 TCSD-C~P 280 RDA-CIP 3CO SELF-INSURANCE '10 VEHICLES 20 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA~DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSUR~,NCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: S 832,371.75 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT VOUCHRE2 07/21/94 16:16 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS PAGE 7 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C ' 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 10,664.66 1,733.08 11,125.72 1,453.28 2,044.39 15,630.75 320.78 1,322.00 21.25 277.72 2,986.20 298.54 49,854.16 VOU~C_HRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 O' 94 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUHBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 15862 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 15863 07/15/94 000308 TEMECULA TOUN ASSOCIAT[ 001238 K E PATTERSON CO., LTD. 0012~8 K E PATTERSON CO., LTD. 001238 K E PATTERSON CO., LTD. 001238 K E PATTERSON CO.o LTD. 001238 K E PATTERSON CO., LTD. 001238 K E PATTERSON CO.. LTD. 001238 K E PATTERSON CO.# LTD. 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 15868 07/21/94 000680 AMS TMS AMS TMS AMS TMS AMS TNS AMS TMS AMS TMS AMS TMS ANS TNS ANS TNS AMS TMS FOUR COLOR, FULL PG AD LIEFER RD IMPROVEMENTS L/EFER RD RETENTION LIEFER RD/MPROVEMENTS CREDIT ON HYDROSEED SLO LIEFER RD. RETENTION LIEFER RD IMPROVEMENTS LIEFER RD RETENTION POSTAGE REIMBrJULY POSTAGE REINB'JULY POSTAGE REINS'JULY POSTAGE REIM8'JULY POSTAGE REINS'JULY POSTAGE REINS'JULY POSTAGE REINS'JULY POSTAGE RE/MS'JULY POSTAGE REINB/JULY POSTAGE REINS/JULY 280-199-999-5264 210-166-627-5804 210-2035 210-166-627-5804 210-166-627-580~ 210-2035 210-166-627-5804 210-2035 001-100-999-5~30 001-110-~99-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-162-999-52~0 001-163-999-52~0 190-180-999-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 ~R69 07/21/94 000745 A T & T 619'987'1828-1MjM 001-140'999-5208 9 07/21/94 000745 A T & T 909-204-1200 MJ 001'140'999-5208 1,320.00 344.00 34.40- 14,726.90 375.00- 1,435.19- 1,959.50 195.95' 22.43 39.30 202.87 214.58 239.86 905.22 133.11 157.90 2.03 401.20 25.66 2.06 1,320.00 14,989.86 2.318.50 27.72 15870 07121/94 000417 ACTS, INC. GFOA POST'CONF AUDIO TA 001-140'999-5261 15871 07/21/94 001323 ARROWHEAD UATER 06/07-06/22 SERVICE 340-199'999-5240 15871 07/21/94 001323 ARROUHEAD WATER 06/07/94 SERVICE 100'164-999-5218 26.00 5.50 26.00 177.99 15872 07/21/94 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES REPLACE FRONT BRAKES 34 100-164-603-5214 78.92 78.92 15873 07/21/94 001530 BAKER. REBECCA PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190'183'999-5301 15874 07/21/94 000120 SICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER THORNHILL 15APR ONT'20A 001'161'999-5258 15874 07/21/94 000120 SICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER UBNOSKI 16APR ONT'19APR 001'161-999'5258 16.00 116.00 1~.00 16.00 260.00 15875 07/21/94 BIELEC, ROBBi REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 190-18~-4982 15876 07/21/94 001532 C P R S DISTRICT ELEVEN GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEET 190-180-999-5258 18.00 80.00 18.00 80.00 15877 07/21/94 001054 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF PUBLICATION/DISABLED AC 001-162-999-5228 ~.50 ~.50 15878 07/21/94 001062 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF FILING FEE (NON-PROFIT 001-140-999-5226 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL APRIL PUBLIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL AD FOR LOMA LINDA PK BI 210-190-134-5802 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL NOTICE OF ORDINANCE ADS 001-120-999-5256 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFOMNIAN - LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN --LEGAL JUNE #94 MJ~LIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256 .L5.879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE AOS 001-120-999-5256 ~9 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN 001-161-999-5256 5.00 134.6~ 139.39 25.59 30.20 475.48 18.58 35.62 5.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 2 07/21/94 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER , A,, FOR ALL PERIOUS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 15879 07/21/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION/CC 001-100-999-5226 56.03 915,53 15880 07/21/94 000912 CiTY CLERKS ASSOC, OF C MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 94- 001-120-999-5226 15881 07/21/94 000489 COBB GROUP, THE INTERNET SUPPORT 320-199-999-5228 75.00 59.00 75.00 39.00 15882 07/21/94 COOK, DEBORAH REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 190'183-4982 18,00 18.00 15883 07/21/94 00139] DATA TICKET, INC. 15883 07/21/94 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. PROCESSING CITATIONS; 1 001-140-999-5250 PROCESSING CITATIONS; 1 001-170-999-5250 156.25 156,25 312.50 15884 07/21/94 001029 DATAQUICK MONTHLY CO 320-199-999-5250 62,81 62.81 15885 07/21/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION REPAIRS/PAVI 193-180-999-5415 180,00 180.00 15886 07/21/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS MAIL 001-110-999-52~0 49,30 49,30 15887 07/21/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 547~-6664-0391-0149 TS 001-163-999-5260 20,00 20.00 15888 07/21/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909181112~ JUNE PMT 320-199-999-5208 15888 07/21/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 9096949942 JUNE PMT 320-199-999-5208 15889 07/21/94 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD JULY AND AUGUST RENT 100-16~-601-5234 15889 07/21/94 00116~ GABRIEL, RICHARD JULY AND AUGUST RENT 190o180-999-5234 15890 07/21/94 GARRETT, ALISA REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 190-18~-4975 606,27 246,60 784.00 616.00 50.00 852.87 1,400.b, 50.00 15891 07/21/94 000t?'/GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FIN 001-140-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 00017'/GLENN1ES OFFICE PROUUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPL 001-120-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 00017'7 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPL 001-120-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 000177 GLENNIEB OFFICE PROUUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FIN 001-140-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 15891 07/21/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT RETURNED ITEMS CREDIT 001-110-999-5220 70.38 40.48 304.58 43,48 46.75 51.58 14.01- 543.24 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE AC3023 SHIELDED DISK WA 320-199-999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE AC3025 SHIELDED OISK WA 320-199-999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL CCNPUTER SUPPLiE AC92645 POP-UP WIPES 320-199*999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE AC97923 P(YdERCNUTE FOR 320-199-999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE AC9417 60OVA SMART-UPS 320-199-999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL%E FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 15892 07/21/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-199-999*5221 15893 07/21/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO OKI DATA PRINTER 320-199-999-5221 15894 07/21/94 GORMLEy~ JANICE REFUND OVERPAID 190'183'4982 15895 07/21/94 000175 15896 07/21/94 001348 GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OF HANK NOHLE & ASSOCIATES MEMBERSHIP FOR MJM & GR ENG SERVICES FOR ~EST 8 001-140-999-5226 100-164-999-52~8 49.90 34.95 20.90 359.95 17.79 43.02 285.15 1.00 180.00 270.00 606,46 285.15 1,00 180.00 27o.o~_ V~RE2 O' 94 16:16 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUHBER DATE 15897 07/21/94 15897 07/21/94 15897 07/21/94 15897 07/21/94 15897 07/21/94 15898 07/21/94 15899 07/21/94 15900 07/21/94 15901 07/21/94 15902 07/21/94 15903 07/21/94 1590] 07/21/94 15904 07/21/94 tr-~05 07/21/94 ,,f06 07/21/94 15907 07/21/94 15908 07/21/94 15909 07/21/94 15910 07/21/94 15911 07/21/94 15912 07/21/94 15913 07/21/94 15914 07/21/94 15915 07/21/94 15916 07/21/94 15916 07/21/94 15917 07/21/94 15917 07/21/94 15918 07/21/94 18 07/21/94 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 00018~ HANKS HARDWARE 00018& HANKS HARDWARE 00018~ HANKS HARDWARE 000186 hANKS HARDWARE HAYNES, PATRICE 000806 HQWARDo BOBBY 000388 I C 8 0 ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER 4# LEVEL SMART LEVEL MEASURE WHEEL TAX SUPPLIES FOR CITY 001-162-999-5242 001-162-999-5242 001-162-999-5242 001-162-999-5242 340-199-999-5242 REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS 190-183-4975 PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5301 SEMINAR/BERG/8/lO'8/11 001-162-999-5261 000796 I C B 0 - SAN DIEGO CHA DISABLED ACCESS SEMINAR 001-162-999-5261 001340 INNOVATZVE IMAGES YOUTH T-SHIRTS/DAY CAHP 190-183-999-5301 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL ~UPPL MISt. POOL SUPPLIES 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL MISC. POOL SUPPLIES 001529 JOCHUM# LORI PNT TO TCSO INSTRUCTOR JOHNSON, JACQUELINE REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR 001329 KOHLHAAS, JEANNETTE PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV ROBERTS 08SEP SF-OgSEP 000380 LAIOLAW TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION/DAYCAMP 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7- 001531 MALEX, SUSAN PMT TO TCSO INSTRUCTOR MEEKER, KATHERINE REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 000228 MOBIL FUEL EXPENSE FOR JUNE 1 00088~ MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-1P~-999-5301 190-183-4982 190-182-999-5212 190-1~-999-5301 001-140-999-5258 190-18~-999-5301 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5301 190-18~-4982 001-110-999-5263 BACKHOE AND OPERATOR FO 190-180-999-5250 ~OORE ELECTRICAL COUTMA REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT 001-199-4053 000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY $ERVIC TENP SERVICE ME 6/26/94 001-162-999-5118 0002~90LSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMP SERVICES W/E 07/03 001-162-999-5118 001280 PETROLANE SERVICE FOP PROPANE YEN 310-162-999-5214 001280 PETROLANE ADJUSTMENT PER A/P 5/10 310-162-999-5214 000249 PETTY CASH RE/MB JULY 001-110-999-5260 000249 PETTY CASH REINS JULY 001-150-999-5260 ITEM AHOUNT 31.45 44.95 54.95 9.8] 126.05 100.00 240.00 190.00 60.00 571.07 177.79 213.35 426.40 70.00 32,12 112,00 128,00 355.00 80.00 100.80 18.00 80.59 260.00 10.00 4ddLO0 468.00 73.08 39.00 11.40 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 267.23 100.00 240.00 190.00 60.00 571.07 391.14 426.40 70.00 32.12 112.00 128,00 355,00 80.00 100.80 18,00 80.59 260.00 10,00 936.00 277.72 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 07/21/94 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 15918 07/21/94 000249 PETTY CASH 15918 07/21/94 000249 PETTY CASH 15918 07121194 000249 PETTY CASH 15918 07/21/94 000249 PETTY CASH 15918 07/21/94 000249 PETTY CASH 15918 07/21/94 000249 PETTY CASH 15919 07/21/94 000252 POLYCRAFT, INC. 15920 07/21/94 PRATT. SUSAN 15921 07/21/94 001017 PRICE SECURITY SYSTEM 15922 07/21/94 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK, IN 15922 07/21/94 00136~ R C P BLOCK & BRICK, IN 15922 07/21/94 00136~ R C P BLOCK & BRICK, IN 1592~ 07/21/94 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC 15924 07/21/94 000836 RANCH FfJFFLER SPEC%ALIS 15924 07/21/94 000836 RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMSER REIMB JULY 001-161-999-5220 REINB JULY 001-162-999-5220 REIMB JULY 001-163-999-5261 REIMB JULY 190-181-999-5301 REIMB JULY 190-183-999-5301 REIMB JULY 320-199-999-5215 POLICE TAXI PERMIT 001-170-999-5244 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-183-497~ GUARD SERV%CE JULY 4 190-180-999-5250 1 CASE 95160060 GRAFFIT 100-164-999-5242 1 CASE 95160070 GRAFFIT 100-16~-999-5242 TAX 100-164-999-5242 PROF SERVICE P/E 5/31/9 250-190-129-5802 DELTA INNERSIDE TOOLBOX 190-180-999-5242 INSTALLATION 190-180-999-5242 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER 05/17-06/15 15925 07/2t/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 05/17-06/15 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 05/17-06/15 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER 05/17-06/15 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER 5/16-6/17 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER 5/16-6/17 15925 07/21/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ATER 5/16-6/17 15926 07/21/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 15927 07/21/94 ROGERS, BARBARA 15928 07/21/94 000397 SAN DIEGO ZOO 15929 07/21/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 15929 07/21/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 15929 07/21/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 15930 07/21/94 000405 SMITH, PHILLIP 15930 07/21/94 000405 SMITH, PHILLIP 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CAL/F EDISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN ORLIF EDISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON-- 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 15931 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 SR CENTER SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 OAYCAHP FIELO TRIP TO T 190-18]-999-5301 BUSINESS CARDS/R.BRAOLE TAX KE/RSEY/BUS. CARDS 001-110-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-162-999-5222 REIMB FOR SEMINAR OUT 0 001-162-999-5261 REINB FOR CONFERENCE 7/001-162-999-5261 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 ,5/31-6/30 43 77 077 333/, 01 05/31 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 ITEM AMOUNT 7.00 19.18 30.00 26..75 21.71 27.99 248.25 50.00 424.32 150.00 150.00 23.25 320.78 330.00 24.03 3,784,55 92.44 877.41 82.02 986,98 88.50 235.05 82.75 21.67 339.90 86.69 6.72 29.84 52.53 z.L85 34.10 3~.16 18.36 19.40 56.79 32.87 36.28 37.94 CHECK AMOUNT 183.03 248.25 50.00 424.32 323.25 320.78 354.03 6,146.95 82.75 21.67 339.90 123.25 97.38 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 G 94 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUHBER ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15931 15932 '=q32 ,2 t=952 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15952 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15932 15933 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07121/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21194 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 000537 SOUTHERN CA~IF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDIBON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF ED[BON 000537 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDIBON 000537 SOUTHERN CAL[F EOISON 000537 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPNON 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPRON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHQN 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPRON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CAL~F TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 000373 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPRQN 000373 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000373 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON S~IFTf ROSE 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 05/31-06/30 05/31-06/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 5/31-6/30 06/03-07/05 06/07-07/08 06/07-07/08 909-202-4204/WE 909-202-4731/TS 909-202-4732/SN 909-202-4733/BH 909-202-4734/KB 909-202-4755/CV 909-202-4736/UNASSIGNEO 909-202-4737/JG 909-202~4738/RR 909-202-4739/TE 909-202-4760/JH 909-202-4761/SM 909-202-4762/RP 909-202-4763/PB 909-202-4764/BB 909-202-4765/BB 909-202-4769/JS 909-202-4770/RB 909-205-7826/E0C REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191o180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 001-110-999-5208 100-164-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 100-164-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 100-164-999-5208 100-164-999-5208 001-100-9q9-5208 001-110-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-183 - 4973 38.06 37.58 38.55 38.24 37.81 31.90 34.59 33.55 134,25 29.15 60.90 35.73 28.43 36.16 36.90 30.13 37.72 231.82 50,97 1,272.34 43.94 55,68 77.03 51.36 58.56 42.98 36,34 48,70 80.78 60.45 38.83 182.89 123.76 36.34 58,97 50,28 69.11 59.78 99.~ 1,Z73.26 210,00 210,00 15934 15934 15934 15934 15934 15934 s~935 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 07/21/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF 000642 TEMEOULA, CITY OF 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF 0006~2 TENEOULA, CITY OF 0006~2 TEMEOULA, CITY OF 000642 TEMEOULAf CITY OF 000316 THORNH[LLo GARY FLE P.P, 07/14/94 FLE P.P. 07/14/94 FLE P,P, 07/14/94 FLE P.P. 07/14/94 FLE P,P, 07/14/9~ FLE P.P, 07/14194 MGNT TI~IBING 6/8-6/10/ 001-1020 190-1020 100-1020 300-1020 280-1020 330-1020 001-161-999-5261 3,139.06 726.66 44.65 21.25 2.00 16.25 3,949.87 34.14 34.14 VOUCHRE2 0~/21/94 16:16 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 15956 07/21/94 15957 07/21/94 15~38 07/21/94 15939 07/21/94 15959 07/21/94 15940 07/21/94 15941 07/21/94 15942 07/21/94 15943 07/21/94 15944 07/21/94 15945 07/21/94 15946 07/21/94 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000585 TILLINGHAST 001533 TIMES ADVOCATE 000459 'TUMBLE JUNGLE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 001437 VlRACK# MARYANN 000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO, WAGNER~ SANDY WALLACE, SUSAN 001542 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WILCOX, ELAINE 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER R%SK MANAGEMENT 001'140'999-5228 PUBLIC NOTICE 001-120-999'5256 PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190'18J'$'9~9'5301 UNIFORMS - PW JULY 1994 100-164-601-5243 UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5301 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION O0 210-190-136-5802 REFUNO CLASS CANCELLED 190-18~-4975 REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 190-18~-4982 BLDG NAINT SUPPLZES FOR 190-182-999-5212 REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 190-183-4982 5100 XEROX COPIER NO LE 330-199-999-5239 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 90.00 31.75 288.00 23.00 18.85 192.00 501.50 25.00 18.00 291.52 18.00 2,969.95 CHECK AMOUNT 90. O0 288. O0 41.85 192.00 501.50 25.00 18.00 291.52 18.00 2,969.~r-- 49,854.16 VOUCHREZ CiTY OF TEHECULA PAGE 8 07/~'4 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 140 CONHUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 190 CGNNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL |NPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY ' 300 iNSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORHATXON SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACiLiTiES TOTAL AHQUNT 47,246.8/+ 8,6T'~.10 156.00 31,340.36 10,556.08 19,303.63 4,764.50 1~,397.18 1,399.97 1,311.31 155.94 7,856.85 737.98 13,266.18 160,165.92 : VDUCHRE2 07/29/94 10:51 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 15947 07/22/94 001543 SUNNY RILLS. TOWING 15948 07/26/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE & ACCXDEN 15949 07/26/94 001537 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GRO 15950 07/28/94 001291 JOSLEN CONSTRUCTION 15951 07/28/94 001238 K E PATTERSON CO., LTD. IMPOUND FEES FOR ARROWB 100-16~-601-5250 AUGUST PMT FOR LIFE LTD 001-1990 AUGUST PMT FOR DENTAL 001-1990 RETENTION PMT 210-2035 LIEFER RD, STREET IMPRO 210-166-627-5804 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 001-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 100-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~+4 SOl 190-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 191-2070 321833 07/28/94 000~44 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000~ SOl 192-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 193-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ SDI 280-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 300-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 320-2070 321833 07/28/94 0004z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 ' SOl 330-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00(3/~ SDI 340-2070 3218~3 07/28/94 000~+4 FIRSTAX (EDD) O004~J+ STATE 001-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~+ STATE 100-2070 521833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 3218~3 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 3218~3 07/28/94 0OO444 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00z~ STATE 280-2070 3218~3 07/28/94 OO0444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 300-2070 3218~3 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 321833 07/28/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-Z070 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (%RS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 547857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (INS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (INS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 3/.7857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (INS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 00028~ FEDERAL 100-2070 00028~ FEDERAL 190-2070 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 00028~ FEDERAL 300-2070 00028~ FEDERAL 320-2070 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 0002Rx FEDERAL 340-2070 000283 NEDICANE 001-2070 000283 MEDICAME 100-2070 000283 MEOICARE 190-2070 000283 MEOICARE 191-2070 000283 MEOICARE 192-2070 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 00028~ MEDICARE 280-2070 18~.60 2,081.73 1,879.98 1,78~.57 4,000.00 895.42 180.64 375.07 8.17 12.30 28.89 15.31 9.34 26.50 10.7~ 28.07 2,844.15 571.29 572.22 21.11 1.89 51.24 53.76 26.85 65.67 17.86 14.97 10,799.53 2,239.18 3,260.33 57.99 48.79 224.15 149.a$ 80.12 287.03 94.65 130.47 2,670.16 489.05 919.10 18.22 27.~ ~4.18 184.60 2,081.73 1,879.98 1,784.57 4,000.00 5,811 VDucHRE2 t94 10:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 347857 07/28/94 0002Rx FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 347857 07/28/94 000783. FIRSTAX (IRS) 15957 07/28/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO., INC. 15957 07/28/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO., INC. 15957 07/28/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO.# INC. 15958 07/28/94 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA 15959 07/28/94 -000921 15959 07/28/94 000921 15959 07/Z8/94 000921 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE 15960 07/28/94 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 15960 07/28/94 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 15961 07/28/94 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP 15962 07/28/94 001222 ALPHA COMHUNICATiONS, 63 07/28/94 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15964 07/28/94 000101 APPLE ONE 15965 07/28/94 000195 ASCOM HASLER HA%LING SY 15966 07/28/94 000120 SICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER 15967 07/28/94 001518 BROUN, CONNIE H. 15968 07/28/94 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CI]4MUN 15969 07/28/94 CAHZLL, KAREN 15970 07/28/94 001540 CAL POLY 15971 07/28/94 000129 CAL k~ST RENTAL CENTER 15971 07/28/94 000129 CAL ~EST RENTAL CENTER CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER 000283 MEDICARE 300-20?0 00028~ NEDICARE 320-2070 00028~ MEDICARE 330-2070 000283 MEDICARE ~0-2070 5 - 275 8TF XL RAIN GEA 4 - 275 AHS XL RAIN GEA TAX 100-16/,,-601-5218 100-16~-601-5218 100-164.-601-5218 ROPE AND ROPE HOOKS 190-180-999-5301 PREMIUM ~476~66002 300-199-999-5204 CREDIT FOR NEW RATES 300-199-999-5204 COVERAGE CREDIT LOCAT%0 300-199-999-5204 LA 6015202070194 TR 320-199-999-5208 SO 107525507159~ NJN 001-140-999-5208 DESIGN SERVICES FOR JUN 280-199-805-5802 PAGER CLIP 320-199-999-5238 SWIM LESSON CARDS 190-183-999-5301 TEMP SERVICE ENDING 6/4 280*199-999-5250 TENP SERVICE ~/E 6/4/94 001-161-999-5118 TENP SERVICE M/E 6/4/94 001-140-999-5118 TENP SERVICE W/E 6/11/9 001-161-999-5118 TENP SERVICE W/E 6/11/9 280-199-999-5250 TEMP SERVICE W/E 6/22/9 280-199-999-5250 TEMP SERVICE W/E 6/22/9 001-161-999-5118 TEMP SERVICE ~/E 6/22/9 001-140-999-5118 TENP HELP ~/E 7/02/94 001-140-999-5118 METER RENTAL 8/94 - 10/]30-199-999-5Z$9 MARTIN 16APR-19APR QAKL 001-161-999-5258 PNT FOR TCSD CLASS INST 190-18~-999-5301 XCA8114361 LONG OlS CAL 320-199-999-5208 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-183-4975 LANDSCP AUO%TOR TRAININ 190-180-999-5261 PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL 190-180-999'5238 PARK HAINTENANCE RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 ITEM AMOUNT 20.86 59.10 23.90 62.62 140.70 28.14 13.08 90.66 2,353.10 1,087.00- 242.00' 53.94 134.96 436.97 10.00 106.40 103.20 272.8~ 288.96 464.40 103.20 103.20 92.88 216.72 361.20 2.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~,.75 6.00 232.00 2,221.18 25. O0 235. O0 32.33 47.28 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 21,761.16 181.92 90.66 1,024.10 188.90 436.97 10.00 106,40 2,006.60 ~.~ 6.00 232.00 2,221.18 25. O0 2~5.00 79.61 -~972 07/28194 001528 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST FINGERPRINT APPS 001-150-999-5250 288.0O 288.0O VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE--?~ 07/29/94 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 159~ 1597~ 159~ 159~ 15973 1597~ 15974 15975 15975 15976 15977 15977 15977 15978 1597~ 15979 15980 15981 15981 15981 15982 15982 15982 15982 15983 1598~ 15984 15985 15985 15985 15985 15985 15985 15985 15986 15987 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 07/28/94 07128194 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07128194 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07128194 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA PROVIDE PLART MATERIAL 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA TREE TRIMMING ON WINCNE 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPEHA TREE TRIMMING (EUCALYPT 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA WEED ABATEMENT 000151 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF C MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR MJM 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN 001081 CAMELOT GOLFLAND DAYCAMP FIELD TRIP 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER DRIVE RIVETS FOR SIGNS 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA AUGUST PMT 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA AUGUST PMT 001434 COUCH, COLETTE PNT FOR TCSD CLASS INST 001541 CROBARGER, RICHARD PNT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. 001233 DANES FEED &SEEO, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD T PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD T PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD T ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5212 001-140-999-5226 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 190-183-999-5301 100-164-601-52Z~ 100-164-601-522~ 100-16~-601-5244 320-199-999-5391 320-2800 190-183-999-5301 190-183-999-5301 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-16~-601-5218 000155 OAVLIN AUDIO & VIDEO TAPE STOC 001-100-999-5250 000155 DAVLIN AUOIO TAPES C90 AUDIO 001-100-999-5250 000155 DAVLIN TAX 001-100-999-5250 000155 DAVLIN COUNCIL MEETINGS TAPING 001-100-999-5250 001542 DEFABIIS, SEAN PAUL PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5301 07/28/94 001172 DELL COMPUTER BATTERY PACK 001-170-999-5215 07/28/94 001172 DELL COMPUTER BATTERY PACK 320-199-999-5215 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07128194 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 2NO QTR UNENPLOY TAX 2ND DTR UNEMPLOY TAX 2ND QTR UNEMPLOY TAX 2ND QTR UNEMPLOY TAX 2NO OTR UNEMPLOY TAX 2ND DTR UNEMPLOY TAX 2ND QTR UNEMPLOY TAM 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT OEVEkOPMENT 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 001002 07/28/94 FAIRCHILD, JUDY REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473 6664 0391 0057 001-2~50 100-2350 190-2350 192-2~50 300-2350 330-~50 ~,0-2350 190-18:3-4982 190-180-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 372.50 341.25 119.00 225.00 825.00 770.00 150.00 31.75 45.69 343.75 647.96 81.89 193.95 252.17 1,195.30 140.00 784.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 360.10 37.20 2.88 700.00 832.00 121.45 121.45 2,820.13 302.08 2,795.88 290.08 17.43 106.66 388.41 43.00 34.~ CHECK AMOUNT 2,652.75 150.00 77.44 343.75 923.80 1,427.47 140,"' 78~.00 14.37 1,100.18 832.00 242.90 6,720.67 43.00 v~HRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE ,/94 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 15988 15989 15989 15989 15989 07/28/94 000993 FREEDON COFFEE, INC. 07/28/94 00018/+ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 07/28/94 00018/+ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 07/28/94 00018/+ G T E CALiFORNiA - PAYM 07/28/94 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM COFFEE SUPPLIES FY94-95 909-695-356/, 909699-2475 909 699-7945 ClTYS 909-699-8632 CITYS 340-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5208 I00-16~-60~-5208 320-199-999-5208. 320-199-999-5208 15Z.Z6 36.43 28.59 34.23 17.17 152.26 116.42 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 90 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 15990 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNZES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017'/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENN[ES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENN[ES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENN[ES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PRCX)UCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 07/28/94 00017? GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT U.S./CALIF FLAGSr POLES TAX 5/8u BINDING CONBS 7/8" BINDING COMBS 5/16" BINDING COMBS 7/16u BINOING CONBB TAX OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES F MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES F OFFICE SUPPLIES RETURNE 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001*140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 820,00 63.55 37.20 47.78 16.42 21.00 9.49 145.37 6.07 50.53 8~.97 7.53 45.7~ 34.48 259.95 116.37 9.17 29.79 126.12 32.33- 1,993.49 15991 15991 15991 07/28/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 07/28/94 000192 GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE 07/28/94 000192 GLOBAL CQNPUTER SUPPLIE C2787 LASERJET IIISI TO FREIGHT TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 227.98 8.76 18.08 254.82 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 15992 ~'~92 ~2 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTR%C CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GUYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CDNPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC.CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN 07/28/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN TAX NEliORK CABLE CAT 5 TAX GNP P170T?-PLUG LINE 8X DRA10055-O00 D814 PUNCH CABLE TIES PANDU[T PLT2 SILVER SATAN LINE CORD GNP 8 CONDUCTOR DIE LDIOE16-A PANDUIT TYPE ATlO3A8-52 B[SKET TAR TAX GNP CRINPER 4/6 CONDUCT AT103-6-52 BISKET ATlO3A8'52 BISKET FREIGHT FREIGHT 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 862.73 66.86 165.00 50.21 40.42 45.00 36. O0 119.40 85.20 27,60 14.35 200. O0 74.20 21.30 3.95 2.04 15.17 VOUCHRE2 07/29/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 15992 15993 15994 15995 15996 15996 15996 15996 15996 15996 15996 15996 15997 15998 15999 15999 16000 16001 16002 1600] 16004 16005 16006 16007 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 16008 10:51 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/9/, 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/94 07/28/9/, 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN TAX 0012/.4 GREENBERG, KRISTIN GUZON, SUSAN 001517 N H R c 000194 C N A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUE CiTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRiPTiON PMT FOR TCSD CLASS INST REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRO 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CUMP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CUMP 000194 DEF CUMP 000194 DEF CONP 000756 i P S SERVICES, INC. RETENTION PNT 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL 001539 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION~ 001539 iRRIGATION ASSOCiATiON, 001186 IRWIN, JOHN 001349 KANE, BALLHER & BERIOqAN 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, iNC. MISC POOL SUPPLIES LANDSCPE AUDITOR CERTIF LANDSCPE AUDITOR HANOBO PNT FOR TCSD CLASS INST GENERAL SERVICES JUNE I SHALL EQUIP REPAIR 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER REPAIRS 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC 001162 ON THE ROAD AGAIN TRAVE LONGTIN'S GAL LAND USE 00135/, P C MAGAZINE MAGAZINE ORDER 001243 PALMCUIST, HARY PMT FOR TCSD iNSTRUCTOR 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PER REOE 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000Z46 PERS RET 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PER$ RET 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PER$ RET 000246 PER$ (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002~6 PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002~6 PERS RET ACCOUNT NUMBER ]20-199-999-5242 190-18t-999-5301 190-18~-/.982 001-150-999-5250 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 19]-2080 280-2080 300-2080 340-2080 210-2015 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5261 190-180-999-5261 190-183-999-5101 280-199-999-52/.6 100-16/,-999-5218 310-162-999-5214 001-100-999-5228 190-183-999-5350 320-199-999-5228 190-183-999-5330 001-2130 100*2130 001-2390 100-2190 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 280-2390 300-Z390 320-Z390 ITEM AHOUNT 7.89 311.47 19.00 325.00 1,370.50 245.61 446.23 34.08 41.66 5.00 25.36 29.29 7,289.]5 189.64 100.00 19.16 257.60 244.]6 192.]9 155.94 85.19 120.00 59.95 287.20 128.82 85.88 12,/.25,70 2,358.97 107.13 ]16.07 169.80' · 103,34 272.52 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 1#837.]0 ]11.47 19.00 325.00 2,197.73 7,289.]5 189.64 119~ 257.60 192.]9 155.94 85.19 120.00 59.95 287.20 V(:/~E2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 O: 14 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM MANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 16008 07/28/94 000246 PERS ~MPLOYEESr RETIRE PERS :EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS 5MPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS ~MPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS 5MPLOYEESt RETIRE PENS EMPLOYEESt RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 16009 07/28/94 PONELL, CAROL 16010 07/28/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN 16010 07/28/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE CONPAN 000246 PERS RET 330-Z~90 000246 PERS RET 340-Z390 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2~90 000246 SURVIVOR I00-2~90 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2190 000246 SURVIVON 300-,~.~90 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 0002/,6 - SURVIVOR 330-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS ADVERTISING JDB ANNOUNC SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 190-183-4982 001-150-¢~-5254 190-180-~9-5228 116.62 289.72 50.97 10.69 13.44 .42 .93 1.44 .56 .46 .93 .93 2.00 13.00 253.50 23.92 19,039,80 13,00 277,42 16011 07/28/94 000947 RANCNO BELL BLUEPRINT C 16011 07/28/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C + '41 07/28/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISC. BLUEPRINT REPROOU PROVIDE BLUEPRINTS AND BLUEPRINT REPRCOUCTION 001-163-~q~-5268 210-190-120-5802 Z10-190-136-5804 64.54 6.47 316.79 387.80 16012 07/28/94 000262 RANCNO CALIFORNIA UATER 16012 07/28/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 16013 07/28/96 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE 16013 07/28/94 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE 16013 07/28/94 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE 16013 07/28/94 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE SERVICE 5/~3 - 6/21/94 SERVICE 5/23 - 6/21/94 SUPERVISORfS TRAINNING SUPERVISONfS TRAINNING SUPERVISOR'S TRAINNING ROBERTS CAR NOT ATTEMD 193-180-~-5240 190-180-~9-5240 001-140-~9~-5261 001-120-~q~-5261 001-162-~-5261 001-140-9~-5261 2,986.59 1,972.09 355.00 355.00 355.00 355.00' 4,958.68 710.00 16014 07/28/94 000266 RIGHTWAY 16015 07/28/94 000418 RIVERSIDE CO; CLERK 16015 07/28/94 000/+18 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK 16015 07/28/94 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK TOILET RENTAL FOR CITY CDBG FI~ING FEE EXEMP N EXEMPTION NOTICE FOR PW 27 APERTURE CARDS 100-164-601-5238 140-199-999-5250 100-164-603-5248 100-164-~-52~8 57.39 156.00 78.00 13.50 57.39 247.50 16016 07/28/94 000362 ROORIGUEZ, JOHN REIMB. FOR UORK BOOTS 001-162-999-5242 95.00 95.00 16017 07/28/94 00070/, S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 16017 07/28/94 00070/, S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 16017 07/28/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 16017 07/28/94 000704 S K S~ INC/INLAND OIL 16017 07/28/94 00070/, S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 16017 07/28/94 00070/, S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 16018 07/28/94 000793 SCANTROB CORPORATION FUEL ACCT# 858900 FUEL ACCT# 858900 FUEL ACCT# 858900 FUEL ACCT# 858900 FUEL ACCT# 858900 FUEL ACCT# 858900 INSPECTION REQUEST FORM 100-164-601-5263 001-165-~-5263 001-163-999-5263 190-180-99~-5263 001-110-~-5263 001-162-~99-5263 320-199-~-5250 309.12 121.36 118.99 22.83 24.38 758.66 669.82 758.66 16019 07/28/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CORTR JUNE PEST CONTROL SR, C 190-181-999-5250 ]0 07/28/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 52-77-796-7050-02 000-9 190-180-999-5240 29.00 1,887.22 29.00 1,887.22 VDUCHRE2 07/29/94 10:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 160Z1 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16021 07/28/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 16022 07/28/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 16022 07/28/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 16023 07/28/94 000305 TARGET STORE 16024 07/28/94 001498 TAYLOR, TED T. 16025 07/28/94 000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN 16026 07/28/94 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER 43 77 077 5200 01 192-180-999-5319 43 77 077 5600 01 JUNE 191-1990 53-77-800-1403-01 000-9 191-180-999-5319 53-77-813-3192-01 000-5 190-180-999-5240 00-00-700-9656-01 5/25- 191-180-999-5240 00-00-700-9656-01 5/25- 191-180-999-5319 00-00-700-9656-01 5/25- 191-1990 909-202-4767 GT 909-202-5153 GY 001-161-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301 SELF-DEFENSE TRAINING 001-150-999-5248 TENET GRILL/CATERING 001-110-999-5260 PMT FOR TCSD CLASS INST 190-18~-999-5301 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C N/PEGSCO (OEF. C 001065 OEF CONP 100-2080 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF CORP 190-2080 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 320-2080 16027 07/28/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 340-2080 16028 07/28/94 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (ONRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 16028 07/28/94 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 16029 07/28/94 000325 UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 001-2120 16029 07/28/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 100-2120 16029 07/28/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INL~N 000325 UW 190-2120 16029 07/28/94 000325 UNITED NAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 280-2120 16030 07/28/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 16030 07/28/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 16030 07/28/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 16030 07/28/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 16030 07/28/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 16031 07/28/94 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 16032 07/28/94 001076 ~ESTERN WASTE, INC, 16033 07/28/94 000466 WHITEHEAD, RHONDA 16033 07/28/94 000466 WHITEHEAD, RHONDA 16034 07/28/94 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC 16034 07/28/94 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC Pt~ UNIFORMS JULY 1994 100-164-601-5243 UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR 190-180-999-5243 RENTAL ARO CLEANING OF 340-199-999-5250 FLOOR NAT RENTAL ANO CL 190-182-999-5250 FLOOR MAT RENTAL ANO CL 190-181-999-5250 ANNUAL CHARGE & PAMPHLE 001-120-999-5226 TOILET RENTALS FOR CITY 190-180-999-52~8 PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-18~-999-5330 PMT FOR TCSD CLASS INST 190-18~-999-5301 AUGUST 1994 RENT MATE ADJUSTMENT 340-199-999-5234 340-199-999-523/, ITEM AHOUNT 18,815.07 5,797.97 29.83 6,842.84 767.35 2,429.54 1,302.17 62.85 82.80 127.25 100.00 237.25 111.07 2,411.57 172.96 148.35 3.45 312.50 50.00 216.82 1,087.50 69.83 10.07 17.00 .60 23.00 18.85 70.47 16.75 135.70 455.00 152.00 272.00 16,980.99 4,893.37' PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 35,984.77 145.65 127.25 100.00 237.25 111.07 3,098.83 1,304.32 97.50 159.82 135.70 455.00 424.00 12,087.62 TOTAL CHECKS 160,165.~_ VOUC.~HRE2 PAGE 2 07 '% 11: 39 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOU/HO0 SET ASIDE 190 CQHNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY" TOTAL ANOUNT 286,970.~9 16,892.31 5,589.72 15,206.81 86,530.20 11,162.14 422,351.67 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 07/29/94 11:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 16038 16038 16039 16040 16040 16040 160~1 16042 16043 16044 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16046 16046 16047 16047 16048 16048 16048 16048 16048 16048 16048 16048 160~8 16048 16048 16049 16050 16050 16051 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 o8/Q9/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 08/09/94 0013~4 AHERICAN CONTRACTINGe 001344 AMERICAN CONTRACTING, 000123 BURKE ~ILLIAMS & SORENS JUNE INVOICE FOR SLOPE 210-16&-6~8-5804 SPORT PK SLOPE RETENTIO 210-2035 JUNE GENERAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA IRRIGATION REPAIR (P-5) 190-180-999-5212 CRC LANDSCAPE FOR JUNE 190-180-999-5250 NEED ABATEMENT PHASE II 190-180-999-5212 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC PROF SERVICE 5/28 - 6/2 001-162-999~5118 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE MISC. LANDSCAPE REVIEW 001-161-999'5248 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE HAINT SPRT PARK JULY 19 190-180-999-5415 001192 K L N ENGINEERING REMOVAL OF SILT & DEBRI 100-16~-999-5401 001339 MORTON INTERHAT[ONAL 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 5 GALS WRITE 2656A9 PRE 100-164-601-5218 TAX 100-164-601-5218 5 GALS MHITE 2656A9 PRE 100-164-601-5218 5 GALS RED 2574A9 100-164-601-5218 TAX 100-164-601-5218 000231 N S S/LOWRY, INC. 000231 N B S/LO~RY, INC. 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES MORAGE RD ST WIDEN MORAGA RD ST U/DEN 100-164-999-5248 100-164-999-5248 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR 280-199-999-5248 CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR 165-199-999-5250 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFtS 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFtS 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SRERIFFwS 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFwS 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 0004~ RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 000/.06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 000/.06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFS AMOUNT BILLED iNCORRECT 001-170-999-5288 LAg ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5288 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 '001-170-999-5299 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5298 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5294 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5290 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5262 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-1230 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5291 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5281 LAW ENFORCE FOR HAY 199 001-170-999-5282 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~I~ FROST & 001483 TON DOUSON & ASSOCIATES 001483 TON DOUSON & ASSOCIATES JUNE PROF SERVICES PREPARE ENVIRONEMENTAL PREPARE ENVIROREMENTAL 210-165-637-5802 280-199-999-5248 280-1270 000420 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN JUNE PROF. ENG SERVICES 100-164-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 68,068.00 6,806.80- 3,150.00 3,210,00 1,619.00 3,500.00 2,311.54 1,000.00 6,877.81 6,884.00 935.00 72.46 765. O0 375.00 88.35 1,120.00 1,725.00 5~589.72 5,589.72 .90 185,312.78 20,423.63 17,403.92 8,604.55 5,625.52 13,293.71 4,154.37 4,154.38 19,031.43 2,503.76 25,269.00 2,786.21 2,786.21 4,927.50 CHECK AMOUNT 61,261.20 3,150.00 8,329.00 2,311.54 1,000.00 6,877.81 6,884.00 2,2~5./u' 2,845.00 11,179.44 280,508.95 25,269.00 5,572.42 4,927.50 TOTAL CHECKS 422,351.A2 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1994 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: as of June 30, 1994. That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of June 30, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None 1. City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1994 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of June 30, 1994 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of June 30, 1994 Cash Activity for the Month of June: Cash and Investments as of June 1, 1994 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and investments as of June 30, 1994 $ 46,475,856 3,328,942 0,537,241) $ 46,267,557 Cash and Investments Podfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution Yield Balance City Hall $ 800 First Interstate 124,780 First Interstate 7,621 State Treasurer 4.623% 32,828,522 ICMA 214,350 PEBSCO 238,565 PEBSCO 19,979 Bank of America 3.707% 508,897 Bank of America 3.707% 12,324,043 $ 46,267,557 (~) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meat budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of June 30, 1994 City Total Assets $ 28,087, 158 Less: Liabilities 3.135,294 Total Fund Balances 24,951,864 Less: Reserved Amounts (1) 5,094,685 Less: Designated Amounts (2) 10,812,721 Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ 9,044,458 Community Servioes Redevelopment District Agency Total $ 3,070,278 $ 21,292,847 $ 52,450,283 635,942 586.682 4,357,918 2,434,336 20,706, 165 48,092,365 553,600 6,653,022 12,301,307 1,880,736 14,053,143 26,746,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9.044,458 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing, and debt service, (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. .< Z ZO ~ Z~ Z~ ZO O~ ~0 0:~ 0 Z~ ~-~ <0 o~ ~0 < Bbi ~:IFELD STAGE F~OAD ' ~ \ \,,. \ \\\',,\ ,,, \\\\\ \\\',,\\ '-,\',. ,,,\,,, \ \', 0 (..J 0 I I--' LLI 0 0 n~ Z F-- C.) 0 0 < O I cD 0 ~ o 0 0 0 Iii 0 z ~ o [-- / < 0 n :7 I© OVO~ 30VlS a~31~311~a L 0 I-- 0 LL_I 0 Z <~ Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 i.i 0 r~ [L < 0 0 0 0 Z Z -~ ~ rr o z aVO~ 30VlS Ql31~311~8 t -~ I11 z o~ rr 0 0 ITEM 5 FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Adoption FY 1995-99 Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution endued: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1994- 95. DISCUSSION: The CIP serves as a plan for the provision of public improvements throughout the City of Temecula. The capital improvements specified in the proposed program are projects which exceed $20,000 in cost, have long -term life spans, and are nonrecurring annually. The purpose of the CIP document is to serve as a planning tool, and to coordinate the financing and scheduling of major projects. CIP DEVELOPMENT The development of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was facilitated by input from key management team members who identified needs in the areas of roads/streets, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities, and redevelopment projects. These projects were reviewed in an effort to maintain consistency with the provisions of the general plan, and in consideration of the long term vision of the City as developed by the City Council. On July 19th the City Council held a workshop to review the draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The City Council provided direction to staff regarding projects and priorities. The CIP document presented for adoption reflects the direction of the City Council. Additionally, on August 1, 1994, the Planning Commission found the CIP consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law. Proposed projects within the CIP were scheduled in each of the five fiscal years based on assigned priorities and availability of funding. Priority rankings were developed to reflect the fact that there were more projects than available funding. COSTS Total costs for the proposed program are $120,967,140,including actuals to date and future year costs. A total of fifty-ninety (59) projects are included in the program, consisting of twenty-eight (28) Priority I projects; sixteen (16) Priority II projects; nine (9) Priority Ill projects; and six (6) Priority IV projects. REVENUES Projected revenue is $61,626,695. It should be noted that, the Assessment Districts, CFD 88-12 and Redevelopment Agency revenues are not sufficient to fully fund the projects within those funding sources. The Assessment District cost estimates are $21,548,541. The projects within this funding source will not proceed to construction without the establishment of the Districts. The CFD 88-12 cost estimates are $20,201,920. Current revenue consists of a fund balance of $4,599,903. To date, significant costs have been incurred for most of the projects in this category. However, the anticipated construction of the projects in FY 1995-96 and 1996-97 will not be feasible unless additional bonds are issued. Redevelopment agency project costs are estimated at $14,834,298. Current revenue consists of a fund balance of $10,845,951. The fund balance bond proceeds are sufficient to fund the Non-Old Town Entertainment Center Projects. However, should the Old Town Entertainment Center proceed, additional revenue will be required to fund the Entertainment Center Projects. MAJOR PROJECTS Major projects proposed in the CIP document are as follows: Diaz Road Extension: $1.5 million Development Impact Fee (DIF) funded project for the design and construction of interim two lane improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road beyond the north city limits to meet at Washington and Elm in Murrieta. The scope of project includes environmental analysis, design and construction of the improvements. The completion of this project will provide an alternate north/south route, which will mitigate congestion on Winchester and Jefferson. Fire Station East of I-15:$1.4 million DIF funded project for the construction of a Fire Station at the Parkview 'site. This station will become the City's third fire station and will allow for improved response times and increase the City's fire and emergency medical response capabilities. Overland Overcrossing: $13.2 million project for the construction of a four-lane bridge and appurtenant roadway from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road. The project is proposed to be funded from CFD 88-12 end SB 300 funds. The scope of the project includes acquisition of right-of-way, environmental analysis, design and construction. The completion of this project will provide an additional east/west connection, which will alleviate congestion on the I-15 Interchanges. 2 Pavement Management System: $3.75 million Measure A funded plan to address the rehabilitation and reconstruction of major streets. The basis for the system is a computer assisted methodology which defines the maintenance treatments and strategies. The implementation of this system will prolong the life of city streets and reduce the potential for the more costly major street repairs. Walcott Bypass: $1.5 million project to provide an alternate north/south collector street between Butterfield Stage and Calle Medusa. The project is proposed to be funded from Measure A and DIF funds. Design and partial construction is proposed for FY 1994-95. Winchester Interchange: $8.3 million project for the construction of a northbound loop on-ramp, including associated bridge widening and relocation of existing northbound off/on-ramps for I-15, at Winchester Road. The project is proposed to be funded by RDA, SB 300 and CFD 88-12 funds. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 1995-99 Capital Improvement Program establishes the project appropriations for FY 1994-95. Projects which do not have sufficient funds within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured. RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMEaNT PROGRAM FOR FY 199~-99 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVElV!E~NT BUDGET FOR FY 1994-95 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets, highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and facilities; and WBF~REAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital Improvements Program is necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 1995-99 is hereby approved. A copy of the FY 1995-99 Program is attached hemto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act CCEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City. Council has considered relevant environmental factors. Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 1995-99" included herein appropriations for FY 1994-95 is hereby adopted. Section 4. On August 1, 1994 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $10,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires City Council action. C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to $10,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. Section 6. Certification The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1994. ATFF_ST: Ronald H. Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of August, 1994 by the following roll call vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 6 APPROVAL,~,~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER , CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Out-of-State Travel Plans RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. DISCUSSION: The following staff have requested out-of-state travel as outlined below: Genie Roberrs, Chief Accountant Wisconsin Mary Jane McLarney, Fin. Officer Maryland Tony EImo, Chief Bldg. Official Indiana Ron Roberts, Councilmember Holland & France GFOA Institute July 1995 $1,000 GFOA Conference June 1995 $1,000 ICBO Annual Code Sept 1994 91,379 Development Conference Sister Cities Visit Sept 1994 - $1500 Oct 1994 M. Roberts - The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Institute was full in June 1994 due to delays in obtaining approval; therefore we are reapplying for 1995. This institute training provides the attendee with invaluable knowledge relating to government financial strategies and insights. McLarney - The GFOA conference in Maryland in June 1995 provides for financial training and continuing education credits that are not available at other conferences held within the state. Elmo - The City of Temecula maintains a Class A membership in the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and has designated the Chief Building Official as its representative. Annually, ICBO convenes in one of its members' cities to conduct conference business which includes issues affecting the building official's enforcement of the model building codes and pertinent education offerings are presented. The main thrust of the conference; however, is the code development sessions which are generally comprised of three (3) to four (4) days of hearings and debate. This years conference is being held in Indianapolis, IN. Concentration this year will be the familiarization with and utilization of the provisions in the 1994 Uniform Building Code which has been completely revised into a "common" code format, aligning itself with the other groups across the country.- More importantly, California is scheduled to adopt this code for use at the local level in January, 1995. R. Roberts - The Temecula Valley Sister City Association is planning a visit to Voorburg, Holland and Carcassone, France from September 26 through October 5, 1994. This visit is to maintain the relationships with our sister cities. Councilmember Roberts is currently soliciting sponsorships to offset the cost of this trip. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for the above travel have been incorporated into the current year budget. ITEM 7 APPROVAL R~i~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Loan Program criteria. City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director August 9, 1994 Community Services Loan Program Policy Thatthe City Council review and approve the Community Services DISCUSSION: Due to a number of requests for loans from non-10rofit organizations, the City Council directed staff to develop loan criteria for loans to these organizations. Attached is the criteria for your review. Attachment: City of Temecula Non-Profit Organization Loan Program Policy CITY OF TEMECULA Non-Profit Organization Loan Program/Policy Puroose To establish a process and evaluation criteria for funding potential loan requests received by the City from non-profit organizations throughout the year. General Policy The City receives requests throughout the year for loans from various non-profit organizations which provide a variety of services within the community. It is the City's policy to subject such loan requests to 8 review process. Fundina Philosoohv it is intended to establish guidelines to assist the City Council in determining when it would be appropriate to loan City funds to non-profit organizations that provide community services or facilities. Although it is the City Council's intention for non-profit organizations to be self- sufficient, the City Council may consider loan requests that provide expanded economic development benefits or substantial enhancement in the quality of life for all City residents. Eliaibilitv Applications for a City loan are accepted from tax exempt, non-profit organizations and individuals for the funding of special projects, community service programs and activities, or other requests deemed appropriate by the City Council. The non-profit organization must possess a valid tax exempt I.D. number. Services or facilities provided by the non-profit organization must benefit the citizens of the City of Temecula. Financial statements for a minimum of three (3) years must be included in the application to demonstrate the organization's ability to function as an effective, non- profit organization. Loans will not be approved for longer than a five (5) year period and may not exceed the useful term of the facility. Permitted Uses of Loan Funds 1. Construction of capital improvement projects. 2. Special events or major community activities. ~ecurity Loans in excess of 95,000 must be secured by a trust deed on real estate, or a security interest in equipment or fixed assets. Value of real estate must be verified by an appraisal completed by the City and paid for by the applicant. This fee can be paid from loan proceeds or paid by the applicant. Ral;q~ Fixed rates are calculated at Prime Rate for the life of l~he simple interest loan. Criteria In making a determination for a loan request, the City Council will consider the following criteria: 1. Does the loan provide local and regional economic development benefits? 2. Has the organization demonstrated the ability to manage existing financial resources in an effective manner? 3. Will the loan create a greater awareness on a regional basis of the many benefits of the City of Temecula? 4. Will the loan promote and expand the promotion of community services and recreation opportunities throughout the community? 5. How many people will benefit from the intended use of the loan proceeds? 6. What type of security for the loan is being provided by the organization? 7. What risk will the City incur if the loan is not repaid? 8. Will additional sales tax revenues be generated as a result of this loan? 9. Will local businesses benefit as a result of this loan? 10. Based on a review of the organization's financial statements and budget projections, does the organization have the ability to repay the loan? ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE'..~' FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~ August 9, 1994 Council Support For SB 302 - Graffiti Abatement RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached letter to local legislators on behalf of the Council and in support of SB 302 - Graffiti Abatement. BACKGROUND: The City Council has lobbied for aggressive enforcement and abatement of graffiti vandalism within the City, Riverside County, and State of California. Last year the Council adopted a progressive ordinance dealing with repayment for graffiti vandalism by responsible parents or guardians, and prohibiting the open display of graffiti implements in stores. The City of Modesto has requested this Council's support of state legislation establishing financial responsibility upon both the perpetrator and his/her parents or guardians. This legislation would allow cities to enact ordinances directly attaching the personal property of minors and/or parents or guardians, and or liening property for the costs associated with abatement of graffiti vandalism. This proposed legislation would allow the City to adopt a stronger ordinance outlining specific means of collecting debt associated with conviction for graffiti vandalism and streamlining the process of abatement. FISCAL ANALYSIS: There is no adverse fiscal impact associated with the support of this legislation. Passage of this legislation as currently crafted would bolster the city's ability to recover the costs associated with vandalism abatement. of Temecula s Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 August 9, 1994 / (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909~ 694-1999 The Honorable Robert Presley Senator, 36th District State Capital, Suite 5114 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SUPPORT FOR SB 302 (McCORQUODALE) GRAFFITI ABATEMENT Dear Senator Presley: On behalf of the City Council and citizens of the City of Temecula, I am writing to voice support for the adoption of SB 302 (McCorquodale)- Graffiti Abatement. This City has taken a proactive approach to the public nuisance of graffiti vandalism, believing that tough legislation coupled with vigorous enforcement and abatement of graffiti vandalism will help preserve the family-oriented values of the City of Temecula. We support SB 302 because it gives local jurisdictions authority to strengthen ordinances aimed at collecting for the damages inflicted by graffiti vandalism. As proposed, SB 302 would allow local adoption of ordinances liening property for the repayment of expenses associated with graffiti abatement, and make it a personal obligation of the minor, parents or guardians of.a minor. Please vote 'yes' on this legislation giving local government greater control over local issues of graffiti abatement, and cost recovery of graffiti vandalism. Thank you for your support. Yours truly, Ronald H. Roberts Mayor {~Prlnted on Recycled Paper s ri 92590 Augu.st 9, 1994 (909) 694-1989 · FAX J909) 694-1999 The Honorable Ray Haynes Assemblyman, 66th District Suite 102 29377 Rancho California Road Temecula, CA 92591 RE: SUPPORT FOR SB 302 (McCORQUODALE) GRAFFITI ABATEMENT Dear Assemblyman Ray Haynes: On behalf of the City Council and citizens of the City of Temecula, I am writing to voice support for the adoption of SB 302 (McCorquodale)- Graffiti Abatement. This City has taken a proactive approach to the public nuisance of graffiti vandalism, believing that tough legislation coupled with vigorous enforcement and abatement of graffiti vandalism will help preserve the family-oriented values of the City of Temecula. We support SB 302 because it gives local jurisdictions authority to strengthen ordinances aimed at collecting for the damages inflicted by graffiti vandalism. As proposed, SB 302 would allow local adoption of ordinances liening property for the repayment of expenses associated with graffiti abatement, and make it a personal obligation of the minor, parents or guardians of a minor. Please vote "yes" on this legislation giving local government greater control over local issues of graffiti abatement, and cost recovery of graffiti vandalism. Thank you for your support. Yours truly, Ronald H. Roberts Mayor ~Printed on Recycled PaC)er ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council\City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 9, 1994 Contract Change Order No. 2 for Project No. PW93-12 Solana Way Street Improvements PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principle Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 with Yeager Construction Co. Inc. in an amount not to exceed $43,855.00 to widen the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way. Transfer $43,855.00from the Development Impact Fund/Traffic Signal Mitigation and appropriate in Capital Projects Account No. 210-165-651-5804. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division reviewed the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way and found that the intersection was warranted for a traffic signal. The Public Works Department inventorled the salvaged traffic'signal e~luipment from past projects and it was determined that there was sufficient hardware to provide a traffic signal at this intersection using a majority of City owned parts. The Solana Way Road Widening provided for minimal street widening of the west side of Margarita Road just north of Solana Way to provide a smoother transition for vehicle traffic onto Solana Way. However, after the construction had started, the preliminary plans for the installation of the interim traffic signal determined that an additional amount of street widening was required to facilitate the operation of the signal. The additional street work required for the signal includes the relocation of the existing chain link fence, signing and striping, construction surveying, removing a portion of the existing street section along with soil excavation, traffic control and the additional street widening for the north and east legs of the intersection. The total amount to provide the appropriate improvements for the future interim traffic signal is $43,855.00. It will be more cost effective to construct the road widening necessary to accommodate the future signal using the on-site Contractor rather than including it as a bid item in the future signal construction contract. This work will be funded through Development Impact/Signal Mitigation Feeds. FISCAL IMPACT: On March 8, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the widening of Solana Way from Ynez Road to Margarita Road, to E.L. Yeager Construction Company for $149,570.00,with a contingency of $14,957.00, for a total amount of $164,527.00. Contract Change Order No. I was approved for an amount of $5,016.15. Contract Change Order No. 2 is in the amount of $43,855.00. However, the Change Order No. 2 involves work that is necessitated by the future traffic signal project. Therefore, $43,855.00 will be transferred from Development Impact Funds end appropriated to Capital Project Account No. 210-165-651- 5804. 'Cit. y of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 PRO_JECt'[. Solana Way Street Imorovernents (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 002 CONTRACT NO. PW93-12 SHEET 1__ of 1__ TO CONTRACTOR: E.L. Yeaaer Construction Comoanv NOTE: This chanae order is not effective until aDoroved by the Enoineer. CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector A. EXTRA WORK ~b FORCE ACCOUNT {TIME AND MATERIALS): ITEM Intersection wideninQ at MarQarita Road and Solana Way. Provide the following items for the widening of the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way as shown on the Signing and Striping Plan for this intersection: a. Relocate Existing C.L.F ....................... 91,710.00 b. Signing & Striping .......................... 98,450.00 c. Construction Survey ........................ $1,100.00 d. Structural Section Excavation ................ $10,780.00 e. Class II Base ............................. 95,830.00 f. Asphalt Concrete ......................... $12,985.00 g. Traffic Control ............................ 93,000.00 ESTIMATE OF INCREASE IN EXTRA WORK: $43,855.00 Original Contract Amount ................................... $149,570.00 Adjusted Contract Amount .................................. $154,586.15 Change Order No. 2(-) (+) .................................. +$43,855.00 Total Contract Amount ..................................... 9198,441.15 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. 0 Approved: Principal Engr. By: Date: We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all sentices necessary for the work above specified, end will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Date Accepted: Contractor: (company's name) By: Title: (signature) Nsme; (print) if the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work end filing a written protest within the tim therein specified. pwO4\oip~projects~pw93-12%cco.OO2 072694 ~Pr~nted on Recycled Paper ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL R~~' CITY ATTORNEY ' FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 9, 1994 Award of Contract for the Construction of an Interim Traffic Signal at Winchester (Hwy. 79N) and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the construction of an interim traffic signal on Winchester (Hwy. 79N) and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11 to Paul Gardner Corporation for $64,822.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,482.20which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Authorize payment to the State of California for an encroachment permit fee in the amount of $10,500.00. BACKGROUND: On June 14, 1994 the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. The proiect is for the construction of an interim three-way traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas Roads. The proposed interim traffic signal project will provide traffic control at the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas Roads until the ultimate improvements can be constructed. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $78,900.00. Twelve (12) bids for the project were publicly opened on July 21, 1994and the results for the base bid are as follows: 1. Paul Gardner Corp ................. $64,822.00 2. DBX Inc ........................ $69,926.00 -1- r:%agclrpt\94~jO809\pw93-11 .awd/sh 072794 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. TCB Electric Inc .................. $73,948.00 Paige Electric Company ............ $75,969.00 Macadee Electric Construction ....... $76,469.00 Peek Traffic .' ................... $78,000.00 Moore Electrical Contracting, Inc ...... $79,250.00 Superior Signal Service Corp ......... 980,479.00 De La Cruz Construction, Inc ......... $81 000.00 TDS Engineering ................. $81 382.00 Steiny and Company, Inc ............ 987667.00 AAA Electric Services ............. $88,740.00 Paul Gardner Corp. had performed well on two precious projects in the city as a subcontractor on the Rancho California Benefit District (PW91-03) and the 1-1 5/Rancho California Road ramps (PW91-04) projects. The construction schedule is for 90 working days, which includes the delivery time of the traffic signal poles of 8 weeks. Work is expected to begin in late August and be completed within the contract time. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. An encroachment permit from the State of California is required for this project. The permit fee for this project will pay for a full time on-site inspector, traffic controller testing, and material testing of the traffic signal poles. This one time encroachment permit fee is in the amount of 910,500. The Department of Transportation will maintain the signal with the City paying a pro rata share: FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees. Funds are available for the construction contact, encroachment fee and contingency amounts of 964,822.00, $10,500.00 and $6,482.20 respectively. The total amount of 981,804.20 has been transferred from the Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvement Fund, and has been appropriated in account #210-165-644-5804. -2- r:%agdrpt%94%0809~pw93-11 .awdlsh 072794 ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 9, 1994 Award of Professional Services Contracts for Civil Engineering to NBS/Lowry for Project No. PW93-09, Parkview Site PREPARED BY: (~//Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award Professional Services Contracts to provide services for the design of the Parkview Site and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the following contract: NBS/Lowry for civil engineering and land surveying services in the amount of $19,945.00with a $1,994.50 (10%) contingency amount. and approve an operating transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund in the amount of $21,939.50(inCluding 10% contingency), and appropriate $21,939.50in the Capital Improvement Fund for the design of the Parkview Site, Project Number PW93-09. BACKGROUND: The design portion of the Parkview Site grading project includes the preparation of rough grading and erosion control plans, storm drain improvement plans, a preliminary geotechnical report, a lot line adjustment plat, a Record of Survey map, and the preparation of contract documents and construction specifications. The subject contract services include the design for the grading and associated storm drain and street improvements. At least three proposals were received for the civil and soils services. -1- r:~egdrpt~94~OBOg~ow93-O9.con Civil Eneineerina: Civil Engineering services for Capital Improvement projects are chosen based on an annual list established by the Public Works Department of firms qualified to perform civil engineering services, NBS/Lowry has provided civil engineering services for the City on previous projects and has performed well. Tentative Schedule: See Attachment No. 2 FISCAL IMPACT: This project will require an operating transfer from the General Fund in the amount of $21,939.50 to Capital Improvement Fund and an appropriation of $21,939.50 to Capital Improvement Account No. 210-199-128-5802. Adequate funds are being made available in the Capital Improvement Program. Attachments: 1. NBS/Lowry Contract 2. Preliminary Project Schedule 3. Location Map 4. Conceptual Grading Plan -2- r:%agdrpt%94%OB09%pw93-09 .con A TTA CHMENT NO. 1 Design Contracts PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered into this day of ,19 , by and between the City of Temecula ("City'), a municipal corporation, and NBSILOWRY, an individual ("Consultant"). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. P~yment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $19,945.00for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. Ownershio of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. -1- r:~egmts~master~nbe skg 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultam for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. T~rm. This Agreement shall commence on August 9, 1994, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 1995. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et see. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Consultant: NBS/Lowry Attention: Kevin Elliot, Project Manager Town Center Corporate Plaza 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 320 Temecula, CA 92591-4638 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. -2' r:~mgmte~master~nbe 12. Entire Aereement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement Shall prevail. 13. Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. 14. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:~agmts%rnester%r~be ekg E. PROJECT APPROACH PHASE ONE: Data Collection 4 hrs. Supervising Surveyor Surveying / Aerial Photography 8 hrs., 2 person survey crew PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN Gather and review relevant technical data, reference drawings, improvement and utility plans, boundary and ownership records, City and applicable agency design standards and master plans. Conduct a site review, establish horizontal and vertical control and prepare aerial topographic map at 1" =40' with 1 foot contour interval (sub-consultant: Inland Aerial Surveys [IAS]) Geotechnical Inv.:~tigation Prei:. 'finary Design 6 hrs. Senior Designer; 4 hrs. Principal Engineer Soils and geotechnical investigation and reports will be prepared including an analysis and recommendation regarding over-excavation and slope grading. (sub- consultant: GeoSoils, Inc.). Using information obtained through data collection, and aerial topographic map, prepare digital terrain models and prepare a preliminary rough grading plan and estimate of grading quantities and probable construc- tion cost. Client/Public Agency Coordination 3 hrs. Principal Engineer Review preliminary design and coordinate design issues with' the City and other public agencies. Notify, in writing, utility companies of the proposed project, requesting their review and comment concerning any conflict or relocation of facilities. --LOWRY Permits 4 hrs. Senior Designer Investigate and process required permits and licenses from jurisdictional agencies, utility purveyors and other affected agencies. PHASE 'I3A/O: FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN Boundary Establishment and Survey 32 hrs. Supervising Surveyor; 24 hrs. 2-Person Survey Crew Prepare legal description and plat for property con- veyance. Prepare, process and record, Record of Survey. Field survey and set property boundary corners per Record of Survey. Hydrology Hydraulics 12 hrs. Principal Engineer Prepare site specific hydrology and hydraulic report providing necessary calculations to support proposed site drainage design. Final P. S. & E. 46 hrs. Senior Designer; 8 hrs. Principal Engineer Based on comments received from City, utility pur- veyors and other agencies, prepare final grading plan, specifications and cost and quantity estimates. Grading plan will be prepared in ink, using AutoCad - Rel. 12 in conformance with City of Temecula stan- dards on 24-inch by 36-inch mylar at a scale of one- inch equals forty feet. Specifications will incorporate City of Temecuta standard specifications and provisions, using the City's boiler plate contract documents. Grading plan set will include erosion control plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with City and State guidelines. PHASE THREE: P. S, & E. APPROVAL AND PROJECT BIDDING A g e n c y Coordination / Plan Review 4 hrs. Principal Engineer Meet with City of Temecula's project engineer, review agency comments and complete grading plan. NBSr~ ~-I~OWRY 100% Submittal Project Bidding 4 hrs. Principal Engineer Reimbursable Costs Upon acceptance and approval of final P.S. & E., NBS/Lowry will provide the City with the following: One set of survey notes on 8-1/2 × 11" NBS/Lowry logo paper. Original copies of all permits and clearances, legal documents and plats. One set of .'completed original grading plan mylars, in ink, signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Camera-ready master set of specifications in hard copy and digital format for WordPerfect 5.1. One set of all studies and reports related to design recommendations. One set of AutoCad file disks of the grading plan. Provide suppor~ as needed to answer questions during the bid and issue addenda. Plan reproduction, mileage, photocopying, etc. NBSi", ---LOWRY -26- EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE r:%egmte~neeter%nbe ekg G. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES NB OWRY SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES Effective July I, ]993 Engineering/Planning Design and Drafting Senior Principal S13 S.O0 Sqnior Designer Principal 115.00 Designer Principal Engineer/Planner 95.00 Senior Drafter Senior Engineer/Planner 85.00 Orahet Engineer/Planner 70.00 Engineering Technician ::~istenr Engineer/Planner 55.00 570.00 65.00 55.00 45.00 40.00 Construction Management Principal Engineer/Construction Mgr Senior Engineer/Construction Mgr Resident Engineer/Construction Eng Assistant Construction Engineer inspector 2.8 x Oir~,'t S0iarv 2.8 x Direct Solon/ 2.8 x Direct Solon/ 2.8 x Direct Salon/ 2.8 x Direct Salon/ Surveying Principa[ Surveyor Senior Surveyor Supervising Surveyor Survey Technician Survey Crew (3 Person) Survey Crew (2 Person) Travel Time Mileage (Survey Tcuck) 595.00 85.00 70.00 45.00 175.00 140.00 Crew Rote .50/Mile Systems Analyst/Sr Financial Analyst S85.00 Programmer/Financial Analyst 65.00 Senior Technician 55.00 Technician 45.00 Executive Secretan//Admin Assistant 45.00 Secretary 40.00 Word Processor/Clerk/Office Aide 35.00 Computers: Mainframe Connect Time PC Connect Time Disk Storage (Per Mb) Reports: (525.00 Minimum) lines Printed CPU Time Photocopies Mileage Subs;'stance Other Expenses S30.O0/Hour 10.O0/Hour 15.30/Month .02/Une .50/Second · ) O/Copy .32/Mile At Cost Cost + 15% 3iiling rates include overhead and are subject to change. each year due to union bargaiuieg agreements and cost of living Increases. lore oayment FINANCE CHARGE will be aDDlied to any unpaid balance, commencing thirty (30) days after/he date of the original :nvarce, al the maximum inrefest rare allowed by low. uBS/L 3.01 6193 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Preliminary Project Schedule Prelirnina / Project Schedule The City's tentative schedule for the design phase of the project is as follows: Receive Preliminary Design for Pauba Road from Lutheran Church representatives August 15, 1994 Submittal of preliminary grading plan and earthwork quantities for review Staff Comments returned to Engineer Completion of Preliminary Soils Report Submittal of Rough Grading Plan and specifications for first plancheck Plan signature by City Staff Recommendation to City Council for Construction Contract Award September 12, 1994 September 19, 1994 September 19, 1994 September 26, 1994 October 30, 1994 November 25, 1994 -5- r:%agdrpt%94~O809~pw93-Og.oon ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Location Map -6- r:%agclrpt~94~0809~,ow93-O9 .con LOCATION MAP 3>CALtFORNtA RANCHO ROAD LAKE VILLAGE ROAD ,.,~ WINDSOR CREST LOS RANCHITOS HIGH SCHOOL ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Conceptual Grading Plan /. ITEM 12 FINANCE OFFICER~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 9, 1994 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts 22715-1 and 22716-1 ). PREPARED BY:/,-Y"Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS 22715-1 AND 22716-1 ). BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tracts No. 22715-1 and 22716-1, on August 1, 1989 and July 25, 1989 respectively, and entered into subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water systems, with: Tayco (a Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc) The developer has improved, to City standards, the public improvements in accord with the subdivision agreement, and the Public Works Department has recommended acceptance of the subject improvements and initiation of the one-year warranty period. A Faithful Performance warranty bond has been posted. On July 12, 1994 the City Council accepted the improvements, substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreements, riders to the public improvement bonds, and initiated the one-year warranty period. r:~gdrpt\94~OBO9~tr22715 .acc Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the public-street maintained system. The streets so effected are Corte Higuera, Via Toreno, and Vintage Hills Drive, and portions of Rancho California Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road, Camino Marea, and Calle Resaca. Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years. ATTACHMENTS; Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A-B"o inclusive. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent r:%agd rpt\94~0809~tr22715 .acc RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO TFIE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS 2:2715-1 AND 2271~1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Tayeo (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costam Homes, Inc.) offered for dedication to the County of Riverside certain sweets within Tracts 22715-1 and 22716-1 for public street and public utility purposes, and said County of Riverside accepted said offers of dedication by Board of Supervisors action on August 1, 1989 and July 25, 1989, respectively. WHEREAS, The City of Temecula became successors-in-interest to the County of Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WHEREAS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) has improved to City standards, public improvements within the several streets offered for dedication within Tracts 22715-1 and 22716-1, the legal descriptions of which are set forth in Exhibit "A" and are depicted in Exhibit "B" . WHEREAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered and accepted by the County of Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system those streets or portions of public streets offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City- maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of August, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor r:Xagdrpt~94%0809Rr22715 .acc June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of August, 1994, by the following COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: r:\agdrpt\94\OBO9\tr22715.ecc STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ss I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a. regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of August, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: EXHIBIT 'A' TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by Riverside County as indicated on Tracts 22715-1 and 22716-1, and accepting subject public streets into the City-maintained street system as described below: A. Those lots described as Lots "A' through "C", inclusive, as shown on Tract No. 22715-1, filed 16 August, 1989 in Book 205 of maps, Pgs 54-58, further described as follows: (Lot "A") Portion of Rancho California Road {Lot "B") Portion of Butterfield Stage Road {LOt "C") Portion of Calle Resaca. B. Those lots described as Lots "A" through 'G", inclusive, as shown on Tract 22716-1, filed 28 July, 1989, in Book of maps, Pgs 14-20, further described as follows: (Lot 'A") Portion of Rancho California Road (Lot "B") Portion of Meadows Parkway (Lot "C") Portion of Rancho Vista Road (Lot "D"| Vintage Hills Drive (Lot "E") Via Toreno (Lot "F") Portion of Camino Marea {Lot "G") Corte Higuera EXHtStT 'B' TO p, ESOLUTI.0N NO. 94,-_._---- CtTy,NIAtNTAtNEE) Si*P, EET ,J VICINITY M,4F ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATI'ORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Anthony Elmo/Chief Building Official ~ August 9, 1994 Repetitive Plan Review Compensation RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an appropriation in the amount of $105,140 to account no. 001-162-999-5248 for repetitive plan review performed by VanDorpe Chou Associates and the Esgil Corporation during fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994. DISCUSSION: The City, through its plan review consultants, reviews plans for all proposed residential tract development. Generally this development comprises several model homes which are built in repetition throughout the respective tract. Plan review fees are paid and plan review is performed initially on each model. Along with each building permit for repetitive construction of these models, a percentage (25%) of the original plan review fee is paid to the City with the consultant receiving a small portion (15%) of that amount. During the first three (3) years ~he City collected plan review fees for work performed by these two (2) firms in the amount of $ 354,460.50. These fees were recorded in the general fund as revenue. VanDorpe Chou and Esgil did not invoice the City for payment of these fees in the amount of 9,259.82 and 95,879.37, respectively, during this time and no payment was made. During this three (3) year period, Building and Safety realized unexpended budget during fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994 of ~ 168,217, $104,710 and $49,626, respectively, for a grand total of $322,553. FISCAL IMPACT: It is necessary to appropriate e 105,140 for plan review services. V:\TONY~AGENDA\ESGIL,BUO 8/2/~ tda ITEM 14 ORDINANCE NO. 9423 AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NOS. 348, 92-16, AND 93-12 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS. THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES tW~REBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findin~,s. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850(b) of State Planning and Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards; and B. That them is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; and, C. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; and, D. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of the City's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising resources; and, E. That pursuant 16 City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequently amended through various City Ordinances; and, F. The City Council adopted City Ordinance No. 92-16, amending Ordinance No. 348, on October 27, 1992; and, G. The City Council adopted City Ordinance No. 93-12, amending Ordinance Nos. 348, and 92-16 on May 25, 1993; and, H. The City Council adopted the Old Town Specific Plan and amended City Ordinance No. 94-05, amending Ordinance Nos. 348, 92-16, and 93-12 on February 8, 1994; and, I. That there is a need to amend these ordinances to improve the ability of the City to regulate and control supplemental and directional signs for special community-side events and activities; and, OrdJ 94-23 I J. That this Ordinance is consistent with the adopted General Plan. Section 2. Subsection C of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended by Ordinance No. 92-16, 93-12, and 94-05 is hereby amended to read as follows: "C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below: 1. Attached temporary signs, detached temporary signs, and window signs that require a permit may not be used in combination during any quarter. is located. 2. All promotional signs shall be located on the site where the use or activity 3. Attached promotional signs shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any attached promotional sign shall not exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. b. feet. The dimensions shall not exceed any the following: (1) The surface area shall not exceed one hundred (I00) square (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed five (5) feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. c. · The maximum duration for attached promotional signs is one thirty (30) day period per quarter. Except that attached promotional signs may be used for two thirty (30) day periods in the 4th per quarter of each year. 4. Detached promotional signs shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any detached promotional sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above the ground. b. The dimensions shall not exceed any the following: (1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet. (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. c. Detached promotional signs shall be mounted to a frame. The frame shall be constructed of a[ixactive permanent materials and shall be constructed so that no additional supports or bracing is required. d. No detached promotional sign may be permitted, placed, erected or installed if the detached promotional sign blocks, restricts or impairs any of the following: activity; orJ (1) The public's view of another business or activity; (2) The public' s view of the signage for another business or (3) The view or visibility of the operator of any motor vehicle; (30) day periods per year. (4) The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle. The maximum duration for detached promotional signs is two thirty 5. Promotional window signs requiring a permit shall comply with the following requirements: a. Window signs that are located on non-door window surfaces shall not exceed seventy five percent (75%) of the non-door window area. Window signs may not be displayed for longer than a ninety (90) day period." Section 3. Subsection D of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended by Ordinance No. 92-16, 93-12, and 94-05 is hereby amended to read as follows: "D. Grand Opening Signs. Grand opening are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed. Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to two (2) signs may be allowed. 2. All grand opening signs shall be attached to the building where the use or Orda 94-2~ ;~ activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the Wp of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. requirements: feet. b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following (1) (2) The surface area shall not excead sixty (60) square feet. The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. 3. Grand opening may be allowed for any period of time during the first one hundred and twenty (120) days of business operation. u Section 4. A new Subsection E is hereby added to Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended by Ordinance No. 92-16, 93-12, and 94-05 to read as follows and existing Subsections E and F are hereby renumbered to F and G, respectively. "E. Interim Signs. Interim signs are permitted in any commercial or industrial zone and shall comply with the requirements listed below: 1. Interim signs may contain only the business name and appropriate logo. All interim signs shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located. 2. The number and size of permitted interim signs shall be the same as the number and size of permanent signs allowed by the zoning and development code for that business. 3. Interim signs may be allowed for any period up to ninety (90) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate. ~ Section 5. Subsection 1.b(3) ofrenumbered Subsection F of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amendad by Ordinance No. 92-16, 93-12, and 94-05, regulating special event signs, is hereby amendad to 94-23 4 reed as follows: "(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller." Section 6. CEOA Compliance The City Council finds that the regulation of temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(h)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California Environmental Quality Act, as mended. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1994. A'I'I'P_.ST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 94-23 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City 'Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-23 was duly introduced and placed upon its fffst reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of July, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular m~efing of the City Council of the City of Temeeula on the 9th day of August, 1994 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK O~ds 94-~ 6 ITEM 15 FINANCE OFFICEF,~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager · Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning August 9, 1994 Planning Application No. PA94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, Paloma Del Sol PREPARED BY: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94--- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4, PALOMA DEL SOL, LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. Adopt a resolutibn entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4; LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. BACKGROUND: On June 6, 1994 the Planning Commission approved an Amendment to Specific Plan No. 219 to adjust the boundary for Planning Areas 1, 6 and 37 and the acreage for major roads, and to make all the sections of the Specific Plan consistent with each other by making minor changes to the graphics and the text of the Specific Plan as a result of this amendment. This adjustment in acreage will increase the number of dwelling units in R:',STAFFRF'P,22PA94.CC 8/1/94 klb 1 Planning Area 6 from 492 to 590, The Planning Commission approved this project with a 5-0 vote with no major discussion. DISCUSSION: The proposed adjustments are minor in nature and are a result of new surveying of the site which revealed previous mapping errors. The approval of this project is consistent with the Agreement KRDC, Inc. reached with the City on January 25, 1994. This Agreement was a result of the City's refusal to accept the park in Planning Area 6 with a $633,000 Assessment District 159 lien; the City's decision to delay the recordation of Final Map No. 23135-3; and the discrepancy between the approved boundaries ~or Planning Areas 1, 6, 37 and the major roads acreage and the actual boundary and acreage of these areas according to recent surveys. The increase in the area of the multi-family site will increase the maximum number of units from 492 to 590, while maintaining the approved density of 16.5 dwelling units per acre for Planning Area 6. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ordinance No. 94-- - Page 3 Resolution No. 94--- - Page 6 Conditions of Approval - Page 10 Planning Commission Staff Report, June 6, 1994 - Page 13 Draft Planning Commission Minutes, June 6, 1994 - Page 14 Section 17.47 SP Zone Requirements and Standards for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 - Page 15 R:~TAFFRPT~2PA94.CC 7/12/94 klb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:'~STAFFRP'I~22PA94.CC 7112/94 k~ 3 ATTACIIM~,NT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94-_ AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIl- OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEV~.I ~OPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4, PALOMA DF,,I, SOL, LOCATED ON TFDe, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFW. CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOIJA3WS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled "Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90-04, is amended as shown which map is made a paxt of this ordinance. Section 2. Article XVIIa of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to Ordinance 90-04, is amended by adding thereto a new Section 17.47 to read as follows: See Attachment 6 of the August 9, 1994 City Council Staff Report. Section 3. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shah be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ 199__. day of , A'rrklST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:\STAFP~PA94.CC 7/12/94 klb 4 STATE OF CAI YFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9__ __ was duly introduced and phced upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199__, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS YUNE S. Gp~.RK CITY CT,R~-K RfiSTAFFRFr~22PA94.CC 7/12/94 klb 5 A]'rACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- ATTACHM~NT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94--0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4; AN AMENDlV~.NT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 TO ADJUST ~ BOUNDARY FOR PLANNING AREAS 1, 6, 37 AND CHANGE ~ ACREAGE FOR MAJOR ROADS, AND TO MAKE ALL TifF. SECTIONS OF THE SPECWIC PLAN CONSISTENT WITH EACH OT!t'F.R BY MAKING MINOR CHANGES TO ~ GRAPHICS AND THE TEXT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AS A RESULT OF TIHS AM~.NDMENT. THI~ ADJUSTMF, NT IN ACREAGE WILL INCREASE THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS IN PLANNING AREA 6 PROM 492 TO 590. THF~ PROJECT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGAR1TA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTF_,RFIF.~LD STAGE ROAD. WHEREAS, KRDC, Inc. fried PA94-0022 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Specific Plan Amendment on June 6, 1994 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WItF..REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted public hearings pertaining to said Specific Plan Amendment on August 9, 1994, at which time interested persons had an oppormhity to testify either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment; NOW, T!~F, REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findiw,s. The City Council in approving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the following Findings: R:\$TAFFRPT~22pA94.CC 7112194 Itlb 7 1. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 is consistent with the City 's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. 2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of schools and single family residential since it is separated by wide streets with substantial landscaping to reduce the visual impacts. Other impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance. 3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall Concept of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. 4. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235 and it's subsequent Addendum. Moreover, the mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (h'~) will be applied to this project. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Agreement reached between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 235 and its subsequent Addendum analyzed the significant impacts of Specific Plan No. 219 and proposed mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. Since this project is proposing seven (7) fewer dwelling units than the original project for which the EIR was prepared, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. 94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, which is attached as Exhibit A, located south of Pauba Road, north of State Highway 79, west of Butterfield Stage Road and east of Margarita Road subject to the foilowing conditions: A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTRX} this __. day of , 1994. ATFEST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAt-~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF 'FF. fivIECULA) I HEREBY CERTIYY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 199__ by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCII,lvIEIVIBERS: CITY COUNCII-MliVIBERS: CITY COUNCILMEIVIBERS: ]LrNE S. GpRI~ CITY CY.RRK R:\STAFFRIrrX22PA94.CC 7/12/94 klb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\STAI;FPJ~22PA94.CC 7112/94 klb 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA94o0022. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall submit four (4) copies of the final Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 to the Planning Department no later than thirty (30) days from the date of approval by the City Council. Future developments within the project shall be subject to Planning Application No. 92- 0013 (Development Agreement for Paloma Del Sol) or any other amendments thereto and the Mitigation Measures adopted for Environmental Impact Report No. 235. The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the services of a qualified consultant to administer and implementthe Mitigation Monitoring Program approved for this project as part of Environmental Impact Report 235 in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Conditions. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Unified Valley School District transmittal dated May 31, 1994, a copy of which is attached. R:\STAFFRPT',22PA94.CC 7/12194 klb 11 The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 9, 1994, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water District transmittal dated April 5, 1994, a copy of which is attached. I~:\STAFFRFr~2pA~4.CC 7/12Y94 klb 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 6, 1994 R:\STA~PAg~.CC W12t94 klb 13 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 6, 1994 Planning Application No. PA94-0022 Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, Paloma Del Sol Prepared by: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 94- recommending Approval for Planning Application No. 94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: KRDC, Inc. REPRESENTATIVES: Turrini and Brink Planning Consultants PROPOSAL: A request for approval of an Amendment to Specific Plan No. 219 to adjust the boundary for Planning Areas 1, 6 and 37 and the acreage for major roads, and to make all the sections of the Specific Plan consistent with each other by making minor changes to the graphics and the text of the Specific Plan as a result of this amendment. This adjustment in acreage will increase the number of dwelling units in Planning Area 6 from 492 to 590. LOCATION: South of Pauba Road, east of Margarita Road, north of State Highway 79 and west of Butterfield Stage Road. EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan No. 199 County R-A-2 ~ R-l, R-4-5,000, R-4-6,000, R-5, R-A-2, A-1-10, C-P-S GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial and Low Medium Residential PROPOSED ZONING: N/A EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residential and Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: School, Single Family Residential and Vacant Vacant Vacant Single Family Residential and Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS TABLE I Acreage Acreage Planning Approved Proposed Area with with Amend. 3 Amend. 4 Number of Dwelling Units Approved with Amend. 3 Number of Dwelling Units Prol~osed with Amend. 4 Zoning 1 36.4 31.5 N/A N/A Neighborhood Commercial (NC) 6 29.8 36.3 492 590 Multi-Family (MF) 37 8.0 9.5 N/A N/A Park Major Roads 114.0 110.9 N/A N/A N/A BACKGROUND Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 was approved by the City Council on December 8, 1992. This amendment added an 8.0 acre park to Planning Area No. 6 and increased the target density of that Planning Area from 15.6 dwelling units per acre to 16.5 dwelling units per acre and limited the total d. welling units of this P{anning Area to 492. This amendment revised the total number of dwelling units to 5,506 along with 53.9 acres of commercial, two (2) acres for Day Care, 61 acres for schools, 26 acres for parks and recreational centers, 111.3 acres of paseos and 114 acres of Major Roads for a total of 1,391.5 acres. Subsequently, on January 11,1994,the City Council entered into an Agreement with KRDC, Inc. to resolve three related disputes between the City and KRDC, Inc. (refer to Attachments 4 and 5). These disputes included: the City's refusal to accept the park in Planning Area 6 with a 9633,000 Assessment District 159 lien; the City's decision to delay the recordation of Final Map No. 23135-3; and the discrepancy between the approved boundaries for Planning Areas 1, 6, 37 and the major roads acreage and the actual boundary and acreage of these areas according to recent surveys. The Agreement resolved the above disputes as follows: KRDC, Inc. agreed to apply to Assessment District 159 to redistribute the assessment and remove it from the park. KRDC, Inc. agreed that all dedications to the City of park land and open space are to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except those accepted by the City. KRDC, Inc. agreed to apply for an amendment to Specific Plan No. 219 to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permissible in Planning area 6 to 590 units or 16.5 dwelling units per acre, whichever is less. The City agreed to process this request at no cost, but made no commitment that the Planning Commission or City Council would approve the amendment. 4. The City Council agreed to approve Final Map No. 24135-3. Planning Application No. 94-0022 (Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan) is a result of the above agreement between the City and KRDC, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This amendment proposes to adjust the boundaries of Planning Areas 1,6 and 37 and change the acreage for the major roads. Table 1 delineates the changes in the acreage. As a result, the Neighborhood Commercial site, Planning Area 1, will be reduced by 4.9 acres; the multi- family site, Planning Area 6, will increase by 6.5 acres; the park in Planning Area 37 will increase by 1.5 acres; and, the major roads will decrease by 3.1 acres. The increase in the multi-family site will increase the maximum number of units to 590, while maintaining the approved density of 16.5 dwelling units per acre. These adjustments have resulted in other minor adjustments in the Specific Plan text. These minor adjustments, such as changes to the acreage and number of units within the text, have not been discussed in the Staff Report but are included in Attachment 6, DISCUSSION The proposed adjustments are minor in nature and are a result of new surveying. The ninety eight (98) unit increase in Planning Area 6 actually replaces the exact number of units that were lost as a result of adding the park to this Planning Area with Amendment No. 3. Therefore, the Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for this Specific Plan addresses all environmental impacts associated with this increase in the number of dwelling units. ENVIRONMENTAL Previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 235 and its subsequent Addendum analyzed the significant impacts of Specific Plan No. 219 and proposed mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. Since this project is proposing seven (7) fewer dwelling units than the original project for which the EIR was prepared for, the environmental impacts remain the same and no further environmental analysis is required. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed project is a minor change in the boundaries of Planning Areas 1,6 and 37 and a change in the acreage for the major roads. The increase in the number of dwelling units in Planning Area 6 is a direct result of the increase in its acreage and the density remains 16.5 dwelling units per acre. Moreover, staff finds the project in conformance with the Agreement reached between the City Council and KRDC, Inc. FINDINGS Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 is consistent with the City's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of schools and single family residential since it is separated by wide streets with substantial landscaping to reduce the visual impacts. Other impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235 and it's subsequent Addendum. Moreover, the mitigation measures prepared for this EIR will be applied to this project. The proposed project is consistent with the Agreement reached between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. Attachments: PC Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 5 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Exhibits - Blue Page 12 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning C. General Plan Land Use Designation D. Specific Plan No. 219, Land Use Map E. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3, Land Use Map F. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, Land Use Map City Council Staff Report, Agreement, January 11, 1994 - Blue Page 13 City Council Minutes, January 11, 1994 - Blue Page 14 Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 - Blue Page 15 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 94- ATFACI-IM NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO, 94. A RESOLUTION OF THR PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'FifE. CITY OF TEMECULA. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMRNDMENT NO. 4; AN AMRNDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 TO ADJUST ~ BOUNDARY FOR PLANNING AREAS 1, 6, 37 AND CHANGE ~ ACREAGE FOR MAJOR ROADS, AND TO MAKE ALL TFIR SECTIONS OF ~ SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT WITH EACH OT!~R BY MAKING MINOR CHANGES TO ~ GRAPHICS AND ~ TEXT OF TFFF~ SPECWIC PLAN AS A RESULT OF TtItg AM~NDMI~.NT. THIS ADJUST1MRNT IN ACREAGE WILL INCREASE THR NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS IN PLANNING AREA 6 FROM 492 TO 590. ~ PROJECT IS LOCATED SOU'I~ OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF MARGAR1TA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. WI~RREAS, KRDC, Inc. fried Planning Application No. 94.0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by referend; WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said application on June 6, 1994, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WBRREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said application; NOW, TttRREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TFIR CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJ~0WS: Section 1. FindinEs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following fmdings: A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said application makes the following findings, to wit: 1. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 is consistent with the City's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformante with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. R:X$TAFFRFI~I9SP.I~ 6/2/94 klb 6 2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of schools and single family residential since it is sepalated by wide streets with substantial landscaping to reduce the visual impacts. Other impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance. 3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not x~present a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3. 4. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development, the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235, and it's subsequent Addendure. Moreover, the mitigation measures prepared for this EIR will be applied to this project. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Agreement reached between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. B. As condifioned pursuant to Section 3, Section 2. Environmental Compliance, Previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 235 and its subsequent Addendum analyzed the significant impacts of Specific Plan No. 219 and proposed mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. Since this project is proposing seven (7) fewer dwelling units than the original project for which the I~R was prepared, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. 94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4, located south of Pauba Road, north of State Highway 79, west of Butterfield Stage Road and east of Margarita Road subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1994. STEVEN J. FORD CHAIRMAN I EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of June 1994 by the following vote of the CommisSion: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOF_.S: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: G~Y~ORNHILL S~RET~Y R:\STAFFRPT~I9SP.PC 6/2/94 IrAb 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA94-0022. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall submit four (4) copies of the final Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 to the Planning Department no later than thirty (30) days from the date of approval by the City Council. Future developments within the project shall be subject to Planning Application No. 92- 0013 (Development Agreement for Paloma Del Sol) or any other amendments thereto and the Mitigation Measures adopted for Environmental Impact Report No. 235. The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the services of a qualified consultant to administer and implementthe Mitigation Monitoring Program approved for this project as part of Environmental Impact Report 235 in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Conditions OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Unified Valley School District transmittal dated May 31, 1994, a copy of which is attached. R:%S'rA~2.19SP.~C e2~4 klb 6. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 9, 1994, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water District transmittal dated April 5, 1994, a copy of which is attached. R:;STAFFILt~T~IgSP.~C 6/2194 klb IX TUUSD FRCILITIES ID:909-695-7335 MRY 31'94 8:01No.O03 P.01 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School Dlstricl P.~, a~ No,eW. ;d.D. May 31, 1994 (ref. Aprg 12, 1994 letter) ~ Varden~ B~a Mmem~ P~ Sated NaasehlCtalg Ruiz CITY OF TEMECULA Pinning Department 43174 Business Park Ddve Temecula, CA 92590 · SUBJECT: Paloma Del Sol Specific Ran Amendment No. 4 Conditions Dear Salad end Craig: We have reviewed the following requirement with Csaba Ko of Kernper: · Sidewalks The proposed residential units are within one-haft mile of Sparkman Elementary school. Walkers Io the school must have ~afe sidewalk and crossWalk protection between the development and the Elementary school. According to Mr. Ko, this reqoiremem will be achieved Through sidewalks in Tract 24136-2 and - 3, which will connect De Potrole Road and the south school property line, and aidewalka from the multi-family area to De Portola. His expectation is tl~t 24135-2 and -3 development will precede the multi-family development. If you have any questions, please call me at 695-7340. Sincerely. TEMECU A UNrFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Director of Facilities Development cc: Patricle B. Novotney, Ed.D,, Superintendent John Brooks, ASsistant SuOerintendenl Business Services Janet Dixon, Facilities Planning Analyst Ceaba Ko, KCDC, Inc. 3t 350 Rancho VLsta Road I Teme~le, CA 9259~. I ~09) 676-2661 Saied Naaseh PA 94-0022 May 9, 1994 Page 2 for review. At the time of the District's review, a District determination will be made regarding requirements for reclaimed water use and/or reclaimed water system improvements. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 766-1810, extension 467. Very truly yours, EASTEPuN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTPdCF Warren A. Back Associate Engineer II Customer Service Departn~ent wt / AB 94-340 J:\WORDpROC\WP\NE~_BUSI. 11\WAB\DELSOLACT lhncho Water Jeffre) L. PAinIcier April 5, 1994 Mr. Saied Naaseh City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 RECEIVED APR 0 6 199 SIjBJECT: Water Availability; APN 950-020-001, 950-020-002, 950-020-003, 950-020-009; PA94-0022 Specific Plan Amendment No. 4 for Specific Plan No. 219, Paloma del Sol Dear Mr. Naaseh: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager SB:SD:eb30/F186 cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS R:~TAFFRI~19Sp. PC 6/2/94 CITY OF TEMECULA ' SITE ,J I CASE NO. - PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 4 (PALOMA DEL SOL) EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 6, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT~219SP.PC 5126194 kJb CASE NO., PA94-0022, EXHIBIT, B SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. DATE 4 (PALOMA DEL SOL) 6, 1994 ZONING MAP '\ CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 4 (PALOMA DEL SOL) EXHIBIT-C GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 6, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT~219SP.PC 5/26./S4 klb CITY OF TEMECULA i e ,..:7:" ~- :':_'.!>..,,,~,,,'~....:~,,,,;.',,:,::' 7 / .-:- =:-'-'{ Eo. :":-: :".:,! .'" --=-'--'- ~-' ~'- VERy HIGH SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 15233 COMMUfITyiNEiG~BORH0(30 ~.4 COMMERCIAL CASE NO. - PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 4 (PALOMA DEL SOL) EXHIBIT- E SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 3 LAND USE MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 6, 1994 RASTAFFRPT%219SP.PC 5126/94 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 4 (PALOMA DEL SOL) EXHIBIT- F SPECIFIC PLAN 219, AMEND. 4 LAND USE MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 6, 1994 R:~STAFFRPT~2195P.PC 5/26/94 klb ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT JANUARY 11, 1994 R:~'TAlqUU'TUtgSP.PC 6~94 Ub APPROVAL ~~/ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Attorney/City Manager Scott F. Field, City Attorney January 11, 1994 Paloma del Sol: Agreement Between KDRC, Inc. and City Regarding Acceptance of Park, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24135-3 and Modification of Target Density for Planning Area 6 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Agreement between Kemper Real Estate Development Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol. DISCUSSION: The proposed Agreement is intended to resolve three related disputes between the City and Kernper regarding Paloma del Sol. First, the Development Agreement for Paloma del Sol provides for the dedication and improvement of parks, paseos and open space to the City in lieu of parkland dedication pursuant to the City's Quimby Ordinance. In particular, the Development Agreement provided for the dedication and improvement of an 8 acre Park to the City at the intersection of Campanula and De Portola Ways. (During the final design phase of the Park, its size increased to 9.5 acres). The Park is now complete and ready for acceptance. However, Staff has delayed acceptance of the Park until 'art Assessment District 159 lien of $633,000is removed from the property. Kemper has taken the position that the City should accept the Park subject to the lien. Second, Kernper applied to the City for final map approval of Tract Map No. 24135-3, located within Paloma del Sol. The Council continued this matter off calendar pending resolution of Paloma del Sol Park dispute. Kemper contends this action violates the Subdivision Map Act. Third, the Park is located in what was previously Planning Area 6 of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Originally, PA-6 comprised 37.8 acres of land and had target density of 590 units or 15 dwelling units per acre. In December 8, 1992 when the Park was added, PA-6 was reduced to 29.8 acres, and the Park was added as PA-37. The target density for PA- AGENDA REPORT -Paloma Del Sol Agreement Januar~ 11,1994 Page 2 6 was also reduced to 492 units, which resulted in a maximum density of 16,5 dwelling units per acre. In the course of researching the Assessment District lien issue, it was discovered that PA- 6 actually comprises of 37.9 acres. Given this fact, City Staff and Kemper representatives have met and reached a resolution of these three disputes through the attached Agreement. Briefly, the terms of the Agreement are as follows: Kemper agrees to apply to Assessment District 159 to respread the assessment and remove the lien from the Park. Kemper agrees that all dedications to the City of park land and open space are to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except those accepted by the City. Kemper will apply for an amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan to adjust the target density for PA-6 to reflect the newly found acreage. The City will process the amendment at no cost. The Specific Plan Amendment will adjust the maximum density for PA-6 to 590 units or 16.5 dwelling units per acre, whichever is less. While City Staff will process a Specific Plan amendment, there is no commitment that either the Planning Commission or the City Council will approve the Amendment. 4. The City Council will approve Final Map No. 24135-3. Kemper shall waive any claims it may have concerning the City's initial decision not to approve the Final Map. FISCAL IMPACT: The Agreement relieves the City of any responsibility to assume the $633,000 Assessment District 159 lien in connection with acceptance of the Park. The cost of processing the Specific Plan Amendment is estimated to be $4,496.50. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement between Kemper and the City regarding Paloma del Sol. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 3, approved December 8, 1992. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 2, approved March 26, 1992. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 11, 1994 R:\STAF'FRPT~19SP,PC 6/2/94 k]b 14 CiW Council Minutes COUNCIL BUSINESS Jenuerv 11, 1994 22 Paloma del Sol - Aareement Between KRDC, Inc. and City Reaardina Acceptance of Park, Aooroval of Final Tract MaD No. 24135-3 and Modification of Taraet Density for Plannine Area 6 City Attorney Field presented the staff report. Councilmember Birdsall asked for an explanation of the confusion on the acreage of the site. City Attorney Field answered that 36.3 acres is the correct figure, however the acreage is not a controlling factor. He explained that the amendment Will be processed to provide for 590 target units. Councilmember Mu~oz asked if 16.5 max density is a limitation in addition to the 590 units or could there be additional units. City Attorney Field explained that the agreement reads whichever is lower. Councilmember Mu~oz asked that the language be amended to make this more clear. Dennis O'Neil, representing Kernper, stated that there is no intention to exceed the 590 unit cap, regardless of the acreage. City Attorney Field read the following change: 4. City shall process, at no cost or fees to be paid by Owner, an amendment to the Specific Plan to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permissible in Planning Area 6 of the Specific Plan to 590 dwelling units or 16.5 dwelling units per acre, whichever is less. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as amended: 22.1 Approve the Agreement between Kemper Real Estate Development Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 8:24 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meetings at 9:01 PM. Mi nutes\011194 -8- 01/31/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4 R:~STAFFRPT~I~p. PC ~ k~ Screencheck S.P. Amendment No. 8 4 Submitted: July 29. 1992 March 14, 1994 Draft S.P. Amendment No. 8 4 Submitted: 8/7/92; 10/12,t92; 10/28/92; 5/6/94 Final S.P. Amendment No. ;~ 4 Approved by Planning Commission: November 16. 1992 Final S.P. Amendment No. 8 4 Approved by City Council: December 8. 1992 PALOMA DEL SOL Fo,-merly The Meadows at Rancho California Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 4 EIR No. 235 Developed by: KRDC, INC. 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202 Temecula, California 92390 (:P,4-909) 676-7290 Contact: Csaba Ko Prepared by: T&B PLANNn~G CONSULTANTS, INC. 3242 Halladay, Suite 100 Santa Aria, Cnllfornia 92705 (714) 662-2774 Contact: Barry Burnell In Association with: Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates - Civil Engineers Ballew & Associates, Inc. - Planning/Architecture HRP LAnl'}esign - planning, Landscape Architecture Land Concern, Landscape Architecture Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. - Geotechnical Douglas Wood & Associates - Environmental Analysis Wilbur Smith Associates - Traffic Analysis Lead Agency: City of Temecula Contact Planner: Debbie Ubnoske, (71{ 909) 694-6400 Saied Naaseh Deccmbcr 8, 1992 February 1, 1994 m SUMlVIARY OF CHANGES SUIVIMARY OF CHANGES TO PALOMA DEL SOL (Meadows) Specific Plan The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan Amendment No. ~ 4 iS being filed pursuant to City Council approval..0f the !'Agreement Regarding!~Pal0ma del Sol" on January 11, 1994. contains ncvcral changcs to thc Mcadows $pccific Plan Amcndmcnt No. 2 that was adoptcd by thc City of Tcmccula City Council in May of 1992. Thc changcs arc thc addition of 8.0 Amendment No.'4 adds~6.5 acres of ncighborhood park at thc southcast corncr of Dc Portoh Road and "H" Strcct. In addition, minor changcz havc occurrcd throughout thc documcnt to clarify thc intcnt of thc Spccific Plan conzictcnt with the Amcndcd and Rcstatcd MOU bctwccn Bcdford Dcvclopmcnt Company, Mcsa Homcs and thc City of Tcmccula and thc approvcd Vcsting Tcntativc Tract Maps. very high density residential t~ :planning Are~:~6~!~cld~ :1.5~ ac~eS(6f::park tO:Planning Area:37; reduces community/neighborhoOd com~Cia! area in;:P!~g Area 1 by 4.9 acres and reduces major roads b~ ~.1 acres. The~eviSed'acreages are based on recent detailed engineerlng to eStablishIl-th~ Shr~0Undin~:::!r0ad~va~ alignmentS: ~C0.njunction with 'design and Construction L~f the :~heigHbbrhq6~ park in pl~n~!~ Ax-ea 37~ The acreage and dwelling unit comparisons are illustrated below.. - SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE Meadows S.P. No. 219 Amendment No. 3 Meadows S.P. No. 219 Amendment No. ~ 4 Land Use Acres Dwelling Land Use Acres Dwelling Units Units Medium Medium High Very High Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Day Care Middle School Elementary School Parks or Recreation Center Paseos Major Roads 536.0 2,338 Medium 536.0 437.5 2,356 Medium-High 437.5 49.8 812 Very High 57.~ 56.3 Commercial 3~. ~ 36.4 31.5 Neighborhood 17.5 17.5 Commercial 2.0 Day Care 2.0 20.0 Middle School 20.0 41.0 Elementary School 41.0 Parks or 15.4 26.0 Recreation Center 27.5 Paseos 113.9 111.3 111.3 114.0 Majo~ Roads lld.0 ,110.9 2,338 2,356 910 PROJECT TOTAL 1,391.5 5,506 PROJECT TOTAL' 1,391.5 5,604 PALOMA DEL SOL I. SUMMARY OF CHANGES SPEC~nC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMSNT NO. ~ ~ Page I-1 DETAILED SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE Meadows S.P. No. 219, A~nend~aent No. 3 Dwell- Land Use pJ~i~g Acres lug Area Units Commercial 1 36.4 Very High 2 20.0 320 48.0 255 40.0 188 35.5 155 29.8 492 11.0 - 89.0 400 44.0 198 78.0 351 10.0 - 7.4 - 32.0 176 49.0 269 17.0 93 49.2 271 73.0 325 Medium 3 High Medium 4 Medium 5 High Very High 6 Elementary 7 School Medium 8 Medium 9 Medium 10 Elementary 11 School Park 12 Rec. Area Medium 13 ' High Medium 14 High Medium 15 High Medium 16 Medium 17 Meadows S.P. No. 219, Amendment No. 4 Land Use plnnnlng Acres Dwelling Area Units Commercial 1 31.5 - Very High 2 20.0 320 Medium 3 48.0 255 Medium 4 40.0 188 Medium 5 35.5 155 Very High 6 36.3 590 Elementary 7 11.0 '- School Medium 8 89.0 400 Medium 9 44.0 198 Medium 10 78.0 351 Elementary 11 10.0 -- School Park 12 7.4 - Rec, Area Medium 13 32.0 176 High Medium 14 49.0 269 High Medium 15 17,0 93 Medium 16 49.2 271 Medium 17 73.0 325 PALOMA DEL SOL I. SUMMARY OF CHA/~GES SPEClI~ PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 8 4 Page I-2 DETAILED SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE (continued) Meadows S-P. No. 219, Amendment No. 3 Meadows S.P. No. 219, Amendment No. 4 Plnnning Dwe]lhlg Land Use plnnning Acres Dwelling Land Use Area Acres Unlls Area Units Medium 17 73.0 325 Medium · 17 73.0 325 Medium 18 32.0 146 Medium 18 32.0 146 Recreation 19 7.7 Area/Park Recreation Area/Park 19 7.7 Medium 2O 40.0 High Medium 220 High 20 40.0 220 Medium 21 36.8 202 High Medium High 21 36.8 202 Medium 22 64.0 High Medium 352 High 22 64.0 352 Medium 23 66.0 High Medium 363 High 23 66.0 363 Park 24 2.9 Park 24 2.9 Medium 25 16.0 67 Medium 25 16.0 67 Medium 26 30.0 149 Medium 26 30.0 149 Commercial 27 15.0 Commercial 27 15.0 Medium 28 30.0 135 Medium 28 30.0 135 Elementary 29 10.0 School Elementary School 29 10.0 Jr. High 30 20.0 School Jr. High School 3O 20.0 Medium 31 67.0 214 Medium 31 67.0 214 PALOMA DEL SOL I. SUMMARY OF CHANGES SPEClFlC PLAN NO. 219/AMESDIvH~rr NO. ~ 4 Page I-3 DETAILED SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE (continued) Meadows S.P. No. 219, Amendment No. 3 Meadows S.P. No. 219, Amendment No. 4 Land Use PlanninE Acrm Dwelling Land Use Planning Acres Dwelling Area Units Area Units Elementary School 32 10.0 32 10.0 Medium 33 37.0 165 Medium 33 37.0 165 Day Care 34 2.0 Greenbelt 35 28.0 Paseos Day Care 34 2.0 GreenheR 35 28.0 Pasees Commercial 36 2.5 -- Commercial 36 2.5 Park 37 8.0 -- Park 37 9.5 Roadway Paseo$ Roadway 83.3 -- Paseos 83.3 Major 114.0 Streets 110.9 1~91.5 5,~06 PROJECT TOTALS 1,391.5 5,604 PALOMA DEL SOL I. SUMMARy OF CHANGES SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMF..NDMENT NO. g' 4 Page 14 SIYMMARY PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Project Location and Local Land Uses The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan project site is comprised of 1391.5 acres in the City of Temecula in southwestern Riverside County. (See Figure 1, Regional mMap and Figure 2A, Vicinity Map). The site is bounded by Pauba Road on the north, State Highway 79 on the south, Butterfield Stage Road to the east, and Margarita Read to the west. Existing land uses in the project area include residential, open space, agricultural and public/quasi-public. a. Existing On-site Land Uses and Zoning Designations The project site is characterized by rolling terrain. Several washes, beginning on-site, are evident in the north-central portion of the site. Those washes meander through the site, draining the site to the southwest and south. The existing zoning of the site is SP (Specific Plan). Significant portions of the site have previously been used for dry farming agricultural purposes. Those areas include the north-central/northwest, and southeast and southwest portions of the site. The southern portion of the site, adjacent to State Highway 79 is temporarily developed with effluent holding/percolation ponds of the Eastern Municipal Water District. The remainder of the site exists in a generally natural state, with the exception that some cattle grazing activity has occurred. b. Surrounding Land Uses As shown on Figures 2A and 2B, the site is surrounded predominantly by existing and proposed single family land uses, agricultural land uses, the Temecula Valley High School and the Linfield Christian High School. Land north of the eastern portion of the site is vacant but has been farmed. Properties northeast of the site are developed with several single family residences on large lots. Land to the east of all but the extreme southern portion of the site is vacant, however, a single family subdivision is proposed to be developed on that land. Property east of the extreme southern portion of the site, and south of the site is being dry farmed. Land to the west of the site is being developed with "estate lot" single family homes. Property northwest of the site is being developed with the Rancho California Sports Park. 2. Project Description The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan project combines residential, commercial, schools, ~ neighborhood parks Ddaycare center, greenbelt/paseos and an extensive circulation network, within a comprehensive plan. The land use designation and residential densities for the PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan have been blended to reflect a mixed use concept PALOMA DEL SOL II. SUMMARY SPECIfic PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 3 4 Page II-1 responding to the changing urbanizing character of the Rancho California area. The Specific Plan is designed to consider access link% compatible land use transitions with neighboring properties, views, and landform relationships. A total of 5,505 5,604 dwelling units are proposed on 1,023.3 1,029.8 acres throughout the site. As indicated on Figure 3, Specific Land Use Plan (including Table I, Detailed Land Use Summary), 2,338 d.u. of medi-m on 536 acres; 2,356 d.u. of medium-high density use on 437.5 acres; and very-high density units totaling 812 910 units on 56.3 acres. In addition, the following land uses are proposed: Community/Neighborhood Commercial (~6.~. 31.5 AC); Neighborhood Commercial (17.5 AC); Four Elementary Schools (41 AC); One Junior High School (20 AC); .~:,:~ One Neighborhood Park/Recreation Areas (15.17.7 Ac); ~::o Three Neighborhood Parks (10.9 19.8 AC); and a Daycare Center (2 AC). 3. Market Obiectives This project is proposed for development based on extensive buyer profile studies which were conducted for the project. The studies provide data regarding: Location features which influence people in their choice of where to live; house features considered important; features keeping people from buying a home; and groupings of features. A number of housing products are being designed at this time with features desired by home purchasers who would be identified as the target market for the project. Examples may be viewed in the Design Guidelines Section of this report (Section IV). It is thought that this research will permit the close targeting ofhomebuyers likely to move to PALOMA DEL SOL and this portion of Rivereide County. In addition, a number of house sizes, and neighborhood types (i.e. cluster, courtyard, conventional single family) will be offered to provide maximum variety and price range. It is the intent of the PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan to be unified in overall theme but varied in individual character to provide complimentary land uses. Additional specific market objectives are: To provide affordable, moderately priced single family detached homes. A market forecast states that it is expected that the supply of expensive single family homes will begin to grow faster than demand, and that homes in moderate price ranges should be more market able. To provide a housing product with larger and fewer rooms all else being equal. Market study shows that general product features associated with faster sales rates are a preference for larger and fewer rooms all else being equal. More bathroom facilities also appear to be associated with better sales. To provide land uses that extend and are consistent with ongoing development along Highway 79 and in the urban core developing in the Murrieta Hot Springs- Rancho California area. PALOMA DEL SOL II. SUMMARY SPECI~'IC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 3 4 Page II-5 MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY (5-8 DU/AC) will be located in Planning Areas 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, and 23. A total of 2,356 homes are to be constructed within this category of land use on a total of 437.5 acres, which is generally targeted to first-time buyers. The minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet. The medium density residential land use is "as a rule" located in the central portion of the site. This use also touches the southern boundary of the site adjacent to Highway 79. VERY HIGH DENSITY housing is proposed for Planning Areas 2 and 6 which contain 49.~° 56.3 acres. A total of ~!2 910 dwellings will be constructed at a density of 14-20 dwellings per acre. These Planning Areas may include condominiums and apartments, which will be targeted for first-time home buyers and possibly the rental market. j Where Medium, Medium-High, and Very High density housing types are planned, private recreation faciIities and common open space will be provided to supplement community open space uses. Private recreational areas may include facilities such as pool, spa, and/or barbecue areas. Exact design and layout of these facilities will be accomplished in conjunction with detailed future tract layouts. COMMERCIAL - The community will be served by three commercial sites totalling ~ 49.0 acres. The commercial uses proposed will be Neighborhood and Community/Neighborhood uses primarily for residents and persons employed on-site. The commercial sites are located in Planning Areas 1, 36, and 27. All three sites will have a community orientation while PIning Area I will also be easily visible and accessible from Highway 79 and will therefore contain some highway-related commercial uses. For a list of permitted uses, see Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. GREENBELT/PASEOS, ROADWAY/PASEOS, SLOPES - A significant portion (111.3 acres) of the project site is being designed as greenbelt/paseos, roadway paseos and slopes. These paseos serve several functions and act to "tie" the communi~y's neighborhoods to each other while providing alterna- tive modes of travel (pedeStrian, bicycle, etc.) to major destination points (schools, and com. mercial facilities, and recreation facilities) within the community. The paseos generally follow drginage courses and will in most cases continue to function in a drainage capacity; however, the majority of off-site and on-site water now carried in the central east/west drainage channel will be carried through an underground system of pipes. Additionally at broader locations within the paseos, recreational facilities may be planned. All roadways shown on the Specific Plan will also have greenbelt/paseos (parkways) expanded from the standard right-of-way. The greenbelt/paseo system is expected to provide a major aesthetic and unifying amenity for the entire project. PALOMA DEL SOL IlL SPECIFIC PlAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ ~ Page III-4 SCHOOLS - A total of 61 acres will be allocated for school sites. Four elementary school sites are planned, containing a total of 41 acres. One elementary school site is located in the southwestern quadrant of the site adjacent to Margarita Road. One additional school site is located within each of the remaining three quadrants of the site. A 20-acre Junior High School site is located in the northern portion of the site, adjacent to Meadows Parkway. Elementary schools are proposed in Plnnning Areas 7, 11, 29, 32. The Junior High School is proposed in Planning Area 30. RECREATION AREAS/PARKS - _~:.:~ A neighborhood park/recreation areas (Planning Areao 12 azd 19) a.-c is planned to serve residents of the communi- ty. Also, ~:~ ~hree neighborhood parks are planned (Planning Areas 12, 24 and 37). In addition, further recreational opport-nities will occur in the Medium, Mediocre-High, and Very High density residential areas. For a full discussion of proposed recreational opportunities please see Sec. III.A. 7. and Section IV., Design Guidelines, of this Specific Plan. ROADS - Major roadways totalling 114 110.9 acres will be implemented in conjunction with the proposed project. The Riverside County Master Plan of Streets and Highways will adequately serve future traffic volumes for the region. On-site traffic will be handled by a hierarchical roadway system consisting of Arterial, Major, Secondary, Collector and Local roadways. Looping Collector roadways wffi generally carry interior traffic to higher traffic carrying Major and Arterial roadways. (See Figure 4) In addition Class II bicycle trails will be striped along most roadways throughout the site (Figure 6). b. Land Use Development Standards Three levels of development standards and guidelines have been established that, when combined, ensure an orderly, sensitive methodology for implementation and development of the permitted uses established for The PALOMA DEL SOL by the Zoning Standards set forth in Sec. III.C. At one level, special techniques and mitigations have been designed for application, as appropriate, to each PJanning Area. These specific standards are discussed at length in Sec. III.B. of this Specific Plan and will be employed to insure high development quality consistency and provide provisions for proper transition between the varying land uses and product intensity. A second level encompasses design techniques relative to architectural, landscape and community-wide development guidelines. These measures are discussed extensively in the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV. of this Specific Plan. PALOMA DEL SOL IH. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. S 4 Page HI-5 At a third, broader level, general project-wide provisions have been established. These standards, which will work in coordination with the Planning Area Standards and Design Guidelines to insure overall project sensitivity are: 1) This Specific Plan shall be developed with a maximum of ~,50c~ 5,604 dwelling units within a total 1,391.5 acre area in the manner illustrated on the Specific Land Use Plan (Figure 3). Generally, the uses permitted shall include residential, neighborhood and community/neighborhood commercial, recreation, schools, open space, and circulation. These uses are more appropriately delineated in the Planning Area Concepts (Figures 15A-15KK). 2) Uses and development standards will be in accordance with the zoning regulations established by this Specific Plan and detailed in the Planning Area Development Standards, Sec. III.B., and'will be defined by Specific Plan objectives, future detailed plot plans and potential conditional use permits as appropriate. 3) Standards relating to signage, landscaping, parking and other related design elements will conform to the zoning regulations also as set forth in Sec. III.B. and the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV. When appropriate and necessary to meet the goals of this Specific Plan, the standards will exceed the zoning requirements provided herein. 4) The development of the property shall be in accordance with the mandatory requirements of all City of Temecula Ordinances or as amended by this Ordinance and State laws. It also shall conform substantially with this approved Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. ~ 4, as filed in the Office of the City of Temecula Planning Department, unless otherwise amended. 5) Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain clearance from the City of Temecula Planning Department verifying that all pertinent conditions of Specific Plan approval have been satisfied for the phase of development in question. 6) Any potential public open space/recreation areas on the site will be developed per appropriate zoning requirements and operated to maintain public access to recreation facilities. .- 7) Design features such as special architectural treatment, perimeter and interior landscaping and buffering of parking lot/loading zone areas will be incorporated into project design to minimize any potential conffict between higher intensity commercial uses and any abutting residential enclaves. (Please see the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV.) 3) An environmental assessment shall be conducted for each tract, change of zone, plot plan, specific plan amendment or any other discretionary permit required to implement the specific plan. At a minimum, the environmental assessment shall PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECrFXC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ ~ Page 1II-6 Designation RESIDENTIAL . Table 1 DETAILED LAND USE SUMMARY Very High Planning Area 4 8 9 10 17 Medium 18 25 26 28 31 33 Mediocre Subtotal 3 5 13 14 15 Medium High 16 20 21 22 23 Medium High Subtotal 6 2 Very High Subtotal RESmENTL,~L TOTALS Acreage Density Range (du/ac) Target Density (du/ac) 40.0 2-5 4.5 89.0 2-5 4.5 44.0 2-5 4.5 78.0 2-5 4.5 73.0 2-5 4.5 32.0 2~5 4.5 16.0 2-5 4.5 30.0 2-5 4.5 30.0 2-5 4.5 67.0 2-5 3.5 37.0 2-5 4.5 536.0 2-5 4.5 48.0 5-8 5.5 35.5 5-8 5.5 32.0 5-8 5.5 49.0 5-8 5.5 17.0 5-8 5.5 49.2 5-8 5.5 40.0 5-8 5.5 36.8 5-8 5.5 64.0 5-8 5.5 66.0 5-8 5.5 437.5 5-8 5.5 29._° 36.3 14-20 16.5 20.0 14-20 16.0 49,8 56.3 14-20 I°~.2 16.2 1,029.8 COMMERCIAL AND O't'aER USES Commercial 1,27,36 ~2.9 49.0 Daycare Center 34 2.0 Junior High 30 20.0 Elementary Schools 7,11,29,32 41.0 Park and/or Rec. Areas 12,19,24,37 26~ 27.5 Greenbelt Paseos 35 28.0 Roadway Paseos -- 83.3 Major Streets -- 111.9 ].10.9 PROJECT TOTALS 1,391.5 Dwelling Units (du) 188 400 198 351 325 146 67 149 135 214 165 2,338 255 155 176 269 93 271 220 202 352 363 2,356 ~,92 590 320 910 5,604 5,604 PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 3 4 Page III-9 Table 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES PHASING Planning Public Facility Size Area of Site Milestone and Requirements 12 Neighborhood Park/ 7.4 AC Rccrcation Arca 19 Neighborhood Park/ 7~7 AC Recreation Area 24 Neighborhood Park 2.9 AC 37 Neighborhood Park 8.0 9.5 AC 35 Greenbelt/Paseo System -- N/A Equestrian Trail -- 7 Elementary School 11.0 AC 11 Elementary School 10.0 AC 29 Elementary School 10.0 AC 32 Elementary School 10.0 AC 3O Junior High School 20.0 AC To be completed during Phase IV, prior to the issuance of the 4,576th building permit. To be 1/2 completed during Phase I, prior to the issuance of the 1,000th building permit. To be completed prior to the issuance of the 2,500th building permit. To be completed during Phase IV, prior to the issuance of the 4,576th building permit and in conjunction with devel- opment of Planning Areas 23 and 24. To be completed during Phase II, prior to the issuance of the 1,971st building permit. To be completed concurrently with adjacent development. To be completed concurrently with development of Planning Areas 8, 9, 10, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33 and 34. To be constructed by the School Dis- trict in accordance to their pupil de- mand and funding capabilities. To be constructed by the School Dis- trict in accordance to their pupil de- mand and funding capabilities. To be constructed by the School Dis- trict in accordance to their pupil de- mand and funding capabilities. To be constructed by the School Dis- trict in accordance to their pupil de- mand and funding capabilities. To be constructed by the School Dis- trict in accordance to their pupil de- mand and funding capabilities. Note: Timing of improvements may be modified through a development agreement. PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page III-23 gatherings; participate in active outdoor informal recreational activities; and participate in potentially structured professionally organized and instructed courses and sporting events which could occur at one of the four park/recreation centers. In fact, the proposed program is significant in that 250.2 251.7 acres of land will be devoted to park, recreational, open space, parkway and paseo uses which is equivalent to 16.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The various recreational facilities are linked to each other and the other elements of the community with an extensive parkway and paseo trail system. The "heart" of the system is the "Backbone Community Paseo System". That system is augmented by neighborhood open space corridors and a parkway system adjacent to all collector and higher volume roadways. The parkway and paseo system will be landscaped as shown in the Design Guidelines (Section IV) and will at a minimum contain one or more sidewalks. Bicycle trails (Class II) will be provided as shown on Figure 6. The overall Recreation and Open Space concept is depicted in Figure 12. The elements and acreage of the Program are provided in Table 3. The various elements of the Program are discussed below. 1) Community Recreational Opportunities. Community recreational opportunities are those opportunities which are available for the use and enjoyment of members of the PALOMA DEL SOL community. They are segmented and discussed as follows: Neighborhood Parks/Recreational Areas Schools Equestrian Trail Activity Nodes Rancho California Sports Park a) Neighborhood Parks. ~::~ Three neighborhood parks (Planning Areas 12, 24 and 37) totalling 10.9 19.8 acres are provided. The parks are located in the east/central and southwest portions of the site. The parks will be landscaped and may include such uses as: picnic areas, tot lots, exercise course, playfield, basketball (half-court), sand volleybaH court, group barbecue, soccer fields, baseball fields and a shade arbor. Public parks will be owned and maintained by the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). b) Neighborhood Park/Recreational Areas. ~!~::~ A 7.7-acre neighborhood park/recreation centers totalling 15.1 acrcs arc is provided. Onc of thc ecntcrs is located in the northwestern part of the sitc and eontaina 7.7 acrca. Thc othcr ccntcr eontaina 7.4 acrc3 and is located in thc oouthcantcrn portion cf tk~ a!t~. Thcacis centers could provide facilities for community meetings, workshops, social events and active participation recreational activities. Thcy This facility will function in at least the same, if not expanded capacity, as a fully developed public parks and could be constructed as a public parks. Each parIt or The park/recreation center may contain a community building and may include the following representative facilities: PALOMA DEL SOL IR. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page HL27 A. B. C. II. III. A. Table 3 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE PROGRAM Acreage COMMIYNITY RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood Park/Recreational Areas School Recreation Facilities 1. Elementary Schools (5 AC each x 4 schools) 2. Junior High School 3. Temecula Valley High School Rancho California Sports Park ~ ~ ~ 19,8 15.17.7 20 est. 12 est. 25 est. (No acreage added for this facility) Equestrian Trail (adjacent to Pauba and de Portola Roads) 4.0 Activity Nodes within the Community "Backbone" Paseo Sys- 2.2 tem - calculated at the rate of I acre per 6,500 persons TOTAL ~ 84~-2 90.7 PRIVATE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OPPORTUNITIES To be provided in each Medium-High and Very-High Density Planning Area by the developer of that particular planning area - calculated at the rate of one acre per 500 persons. Medium-High Density Very-High Density 11.3 3.0 TOTAL 14.3 OPEN SPACE, GREENBELT/PASEOS AND PARKWAY PASEOS Open Space Corridors by Residential Density To be provided in each Medium and Medium-High Density Planning Area by the developer of that particular planning area - calculated at a rate of one acre per 250 persons. Medium (except for Planning Areas 1, 25 and 26 for which no provision for open space, greenbelts/paseos or parkway paseos will be made because of the 7,200 square foot minimum lot size.) Medium-High 22.6 minus 11.3 acres for active participa- tion opportunities. 23.0 11.3 PALOMA DEL SOL IlL SPECIfiC PLAN SPECIrlC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. a 4 Page III-29 Table 3 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE PROGRAM (continued) Community "Backbone" Paseo System (28 minus 2.2 acres for activity nodes) Roadway Paseos 1. Medium Density Residential 2. Medium High (Clusters) 3. Very High (Apartments) TOTAL OVERALL RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE OPPORTUNITIES ' Acreage 25.8 55.9 28.7 2.0 146.7 2~0.2 251.7 PkLOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~' 4 Page III-30 2) 3) immediately northwest of the site, at the intersection of Margarita and Pauba Roads. This park will contain sports fields and recreational facilities for use by all residents in the area. Private Active Participation Opportunities. In medium-high density single family detached neighborhoods and in neighborhoods containing attached housing types, private recreation facilities will be provided at a rate of one acre per 500 persons. It is expected that there will be a number of these recreational facilities throughout the site in the medium-high, and very high density areas. The paseo and roadway systems have segmented the property into numerous residential ericlaves (neighborhoods). It is envisioned that the majority of those ericlaves will have private recreational facilities. Private recreational areas may include facilities such as pools, spas, cabanas, meeting rooms, barbecues, wetbars, and kitchen facilities. In the medium density areas these private recreational facilities will be located within secondary paseo parkways which weave through the neighbor hoods. It should be emphasized that PALOMA DEL SOL is being planned as a single integrated community and that the community-wide recreational facilities (paseos/ trails, community recreation centers, neighborhood parks, and the equestrian trail) will be available to all residents of PALOMA DEL SOL. Future individual tract approvals must therefore receive credit for the overall project-wide open space and recreation systems in assessing open space and recreation requirements for each future individual tract. Open Space, Greenbelt Paseos, Parkway Paseos. a) Open Space Corridors will be provided in the medium and medium-high density residential neighborhoods and will be calculated at a rate of one acre per 250 persons. One exception is that provisions for internal greenbelt/ paseos are not required when average lot sizes meet or exceed a 7,200 square foot minimum. Greenbelt/paseos will provide several functions. First, they will give additional separation between numerous dwellings in the medium and medium-high density residential neighborhoods (essentially, higher density single family neighborhoods). Second, they will provide an area for a limited amount of passive recreational opportunities to occur. Third, in many instances, they will provide a link to the community paseo system (discussed below). Fourth, in the medium-high density residential areas, they will provide an area in which neighborhood active participation recreational facilities can be located. Facilities, other than those just noted, will not be provided within these corridors with the possible exception of a trail in some locations. However, paseo areas will be landscaped with turf, trees, etc. so that they will be aesthetically pleasing. The corridors will be owned and maintained by a neighborhood homeowners association. b) Community "Backbone" Greenbelt/Paseo System. The community paseo system containing a total of 28 acres of land, will provide pedestrian and PALOMA DEL SOL Ill. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 3 4 Page III-32 2) 3) 4) 5) bicycle access links throughout the PALOMA DEL SOL community. The system will vary in width and will meander throughout the community. (See Figure 11.) Being fully landscaped, the system not only will function as a trail system, but it also will be aesthetically pleasing and will provide dwelling unit and land use separations. The system will contain a pedestrian path that is 8 feet in width, and community activity nodes will provide linkages not only to each neighborhood within the Community, but also to major destination points including schools, park, community recreation centers, shopping facilities, and the Rancho California Sports Park just northwest of the site. Since all residents of PALOMA DEL SOL will be allowed to use this system, it will be maintained by the Master Homeowners' Association or the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). c) Parkway Open Space Adjacent to Roadways. An expanded parkway system will be located adjacent to all collector and higher volume roadways. The parkway system will be landscaped with turf, trees, and various additional plant materials. Community "theme" walls will be located adjacent to the parkways. Park ways will vary in width with a buffer located adjacent to Highway 79. Some of the parkways will meander, thus creating changing and interesting viewpoints to those using them. Sidewalks will be provided on each side of the parkways throughout the development. Also to be included are bicycle lanes on selected roadways. Open Space and Recreation Plan Development Standards ~:;c Three neighborhood parks will be provided for the benefit of all residents within the Community. The neighborhood parks may contain the following facilities/equipment: Picnic area(s), tot lot(s), exercise course(s), playfield(s), rest rooms, parking areas, and a basketball court (half-court), soccer fields and baseball fields. ~::~ One neighborhood park/recreational areas will be provided for the benefit of all residents within the community. The neighborhood park;/recreation centers may be developed as a public or private passive parks. As an alternative, the sites may be developed as a private or public active parks or recreation centers which may contain the following representative equipment: Pool Complex (swimming pool, pool deck, wading pool and spa), tennis courts, volleyball courts, tot lot, adventure play, group picnic/barbecue facilities, open play turf area, clubhouse building, and parking areas. (See Section IV, Design Guidelines for further definition of included equipment.) Five sites will be provided for schools (four elementary schools, and one junior high school). When constructed, those schools will have playgrounds and areas which PALOMA DEL SOL I]1. SPECIFIC PLAN SPEClFtC PLAN NO. 2Ig/AMENDMENT NO. g' 4 Page IH-33 1. Planning Area 1 a. Descriptive Summary Planning Area 1, as depicted on Figure 15A, provides for development of 36.4 31.5 acres with Community/Neighborhood Commercial use. A typical site plan is depicted in the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV. b. Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Zone Ordinance No. 92-20 (See S.P. Zone Ordinance Tab.) c. Planning Standards 1) Access to the Planning Area will be provided from Margarita Road, State Route 79 and a secondary roadway CH" Street) to the northeast. Access points, as depicted, are conceptual. Access to 'the individual planning areas shall be determined when tract maps or plot plans are submitted. Access along Highway 79 is subject to CalTrans approval. 2) A Minor Community entry statement will be provided at the intersection of Highway 79 and Margarita Road at the southwest boundary of the Planning Area. (See Figure 32.) 3) Minor Project entry statements will be provided at the intersection of "H" Street and Meadows Parkway at the northeastern boundary of the Planning Area and at the intersection of Margarita Road and Portola Road at the northwestern comer of Planning Area 36. (See Figures 35 and 36.) 4) A Major Community entry statement will be provided at the intersection of Highway 79 and Meadows Parkway at the southeastern boundary of the Planning Area. (See Figure 32 and 33). 5) Roadway 23B and Meadows landscape treatments, such as those depicted on Figures 25, 23A, 23A, 27 respectively shall be provided along Highway 79, Margarita Road, Parkway, De P~ortola Road, and "H" Street. 6) A bicycle trail will be located in Meadows Parkway, De Portold Road and Street to the north and east of the Planning Area as shown on Figure 6. 7) A Project Intersection statement, as depicted on Figure 38, will be provided at De Portold Road and "H" Street. 8) Please refer to Section III.A.1. through III.A.8. for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide: PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page III-45 6. Planning Area 6 a. Descriptive Summary Planning Area 6, as depicted on Figure 15F, provides for development of 3T.S 36.3 acres with Very High density residential use. A maximum total of 492 590 dwelling units are planned at a target density of 16.5 du/ac (Density Range 14-20 du/ac). A conceptual site plan is depicted in the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV. b. Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Zone Ordinance No. 92-20 (See S.P. Zone Ordinance Tab.) c. Planning Standards 1) Access to the Planning Area will be provided from a collector roadway ("H" Street) to the south, De Portola Road to the north, and Meadows Park~vay to the east. Access points, as depicted, are conceptual. Access to individual planning areas shall be determined when tract maps or plot plans are submitted. 2) A Community Intersection entry statement will be provided at the intersection of Meadows Parkway and De Portola Road at the northeastern boundary of the Planning Area. (See Figure 34.) A minor project entry statement shall be provided at the corner of Meadows Parkway and de Portola Road at the southeastern corner of the Planning Area (see. Figure 35). 3) A minimum of one neighborhood entry statement will be provided at egress points onto "H" Street at the southern boundary of the Planning Area. (See Figure 37.) 4) Roadway landscape treatments, such as those depicted on Figures 23B, 23B and 27 respectively shall be provided along De Portola Road, Meadows Parkway, and "H" Street. 5) Private recreation facilities are planned which may include facilities such as pools, spas, cabanas, meeting roams, barbecues, wet bars, and kitchen facilities. 6) Bicycle trails will be located in De Portola Road, Meadows Parkway, and "H" Street surrounding the Planning Area as shown on Figure 6. 7) Balconies may encroach into building setback lines. 8) A site of archaeological/historical significance is located within this planning area. Prior to issuance of Development or Grading Permits, an appropriate detailed mitigation program shall be identified and, if necessary, completed. This program shall be approved by the History Division of the Riverside County Parks and Recreation Department. PALOn DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/A~MENDME;Yr NO. g 4 Page III-60 12. Planning Area 12 a. Descriptive Summary Planning Area 12, as depicted on Figure 15L, provides for development of 7.4 acres with a neighborhood park or a community recrcation facility. A ~-:^~ conceptual site plan is depicted in the Design Guidelines, Sec. IV. b. Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Zone Ordinance No. 92-20 (See S.P. Zone Ordinance Tab.) c. Planning Standards 1) Access to the Planning Area will be provided from the Collector Road "D" Street to the south. 2) Access to the site will also be available from the community paseo system to the north. 3) Roadway landscape treatment, as depicted on Figures 27, shall be provided along the Collector Road "D" Street to the south. 4) The Community Paseo to the north shall be developed in accordance to Figure 30. 5) For parldrccrcation facility conceptual design plans, see the Design Manual Section of this Specific Plan, ~Section IV.B.C. This Planning Area will be constructed and fully operational prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 4,576th residential unit within the Specific Plan. 6) A bicycle trail will be located in "D" Street to the south of the Planning Area as shown on Figure 6. 7) Please refer to Section III .A. 1. through III.A. 8. for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide: III.A. 1. Specific Land Use Plan III.A.2. Circulation Plan III.A.3. Drainage Plan III.A.4. Water and Sewer Plans III.A.5. Public Facility Sites Phasing Plan III.A.6. Grading Plan III.A.7. Open Space and Recreation Plan III.A.8. Landscaping Plan 8) Please refer to Section IV., Design Guidelines for related criteria. PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECmZC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page III-78 37. Planning Area 37 a. Descriptive Summary Planning Area 37, as depicted on Figure 15F, provides for development of S.0 9.5 acres with a neighborhood park. A conceptual site plan is provided in the Design Guidelines, Section IV. b. La.nd Use and Development Standards' Please refer to Zone Ordinance No. 92-20. (See S.P. Zone Ordinance Tab.) c. Planning Standards 1) Access to the Planning Area will be provided from "H" Street and De Portola Road. 2) A bicycle trail will be located in "H" Street and in De Portola Road. 3) For park concept design plans, see the Design Manual section of this Specific Plan, Section IV.B. This facility shall be constructed and fully operable prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the 1,971st residential unit ~vithin the Specific Plan. 4) Please refer to Section III.A.1 through III.A.8 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide: III.A.1. Specific Land Use Plan III.A.2. Circulation Plan III.A.3. Drainage Plan III.A.4. Water and Sewer Plans III.A.5. Public Facility Sites Phasing Plan III.A.6. Grading Plan III.A.7. Open Space and Recreation Plan III.A.8. Landscaping Plan 5) Please also see Section l'V, Design Guidelines, for related criteria. PALOn DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page III-150 Phase I II Ill Use Table 4 DEVELOPMENT PHASING Medium Medium Medium Medium Park or Recreation Area Elementary School Day Care Center Comm/Neigh/Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Planning Area Subtotal 17 18 33(partial) 16 19 7 34 1 36 Medium Medium Medium Medium High Medium Elementary School Neighborhood Park Subtotal Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High Medium High Medium High Junior H.S. Elementary Schoql Subtotal 4 8 33(partial) 3 20 32 37 25 26 9 10 28 31 15 21 22(partial) 30 29 Acres 73.0 32.0 15.0 49.2 7.7 11.0 2.0 3~.4 31.5 2.5 223.9 258.5 Maximum D.U.'s 325 146 66 271 808 40.0 188 89.0 400 22.0 99 48.0 255 40.0 220 10.0 -- S.0 9.5 -- I 1,162 16.0 67 30.0 149 44.0 198 78.0 351 30.0 135 67.0 214 17.0 93 36.8 202 16.0 86 20,0 10.0 I 364-sl 1,495 PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. ~ 4 Page III-153 Table 4 DEVELOPMENT PHASING continued) Phase V Use Medium High Medium High Medium High Elementary School Neighborhood Park-e~ Rocroation Arca Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Park Subtotal Medium High Very High Medium High Very High Subtotal Other Major Streets Land Greenbelt Paseos Uses Roadway Paseos PROJECT TOTAL Planning Area 14 22(partial) 23 11 12 27 24 13 6 5 2 Acres 49.0 48.0 66.0 10.0 7.4 15.0 2.9 198.3 32.0 29.~° 36.3 35.5 20.0 !!7.3 123.8 ~4~110.9 28.0 83.3 1,391,5 Maximum D.U.'s 269 266 363 898 176 ~92 590 155 320 5~06 5,604 PALOMA DEL SOL III. SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219/AMENDMENT NO. 3 4 Page III-154 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 6, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT~,22PA94.CC 7/12/94 Idb 14 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5. JUNE 6, 1994 Tentative Parcel MaD No. 25063 Proposal to subdivide a 20 acre parcel into 68 residential units. Located at the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 2000 feet east of Calle Medusa. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commission Salyer to continue this item to the meeting of July 18, 1994. The moll'on carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland, Salyer, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey PA94-0022 (Paloma Del Sol Amendment) Proposal requesting Approval of Amendment #4 to Specific Plan No. 219, Paloma Del Sol, to adjust the boundaries of Planning Areas 1,6 and 37 and to change the acreage for major roads. Associate Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:15 P.M. Csaba Ko, Kemper Community Development Company, said he concurs with the staff report and offered to answer any questions. It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by CommissionerHoagland to close the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. and recommend Adoption of Resolution No. 94-17 recommending Approval for Planning Application No. 94-0022, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Hoagland, Salyer, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PCMINO61061~ 6 O6/14194 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 SECTION 17.47 SP ZONE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 4 R:\STAFFRPT\22PA94.CC 7/12/94 klb 15 Medium Density Residential Planning Areas 4, 8, 9, 10, 17, 18, 25, 26, 28 & 33 Medium Density Residential Zone The following regulations shall apply in all Medium Density Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMiTtED. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone: ( 1 ) One farnHy dwellings. (2) Two-family dwellings. (3) Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and country clubs. (4) Home occupations. (5) Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to -the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). The following uses ate permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet (2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during 'the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a perled of 2 years in any event (3) Nurseries, horticultural. SECTION6.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). a. Building height shall not exc_--_d 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet Lot area shall be not less than 5,000 sq. ft Howev~, the lot area for two-family dwellings shall be not less than 4,500 sq. ft per dwelling unit The minimum lot area -1- Cm shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building sit~. The minimum average width of that portion of the lot to be used as a building site shall bc 45 fcct with a minimum average depth of 85 fccL However, for two-family dwelling lots, the mi. nimun~ average width shall be ~0 fcct with the same minimum average depth of 85 feet. That l~on of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 45 feet, except that lots f~onting on knucldcs or cul-dc-sacs may have a ~imallll frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilincar stm~ts may be m~asured at the building setback in accoadancc with zone development standards. Minimum yard requirements axe as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than I0 feet, mcastucd from the existing public right-of-way str~:t line or f-ram any futur~ public right-of-way slreet line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feel Side yards on corner and reversed corner lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing public fight-of-way street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is near~ the proposed structure, upon which the main buffcling sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard newel not exceed 20% of the width of the lot. (3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In .ttt. tion, the following standard shall also apply: (a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or Structures. No structural cncroachmcnts sha~l be permitted in the front, side or rear yan:l without approval of a setback adjusmlcnt pursuant to City Ordinance. (4) Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). C -2- Medium Density Residential Planning Area 31 Medium Density Residential Zone The follo~ing regulations shall apply in all Medium D~nsity Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitw, d in the Medium D~nsity Residential Zone: (1) One family dwellings. (2) Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fah'ways and counwy clubs. (3) Home occupations. (4) Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). The following uses axe permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in area. (2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years in any event. (3) Nurseries, horticultural. SECTION 6.2.. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). a. Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feel Lot area shall be not less than 7,200 sq. fL The minimum lot ma shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. -3- The minimum avenge width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 60 feet with a mlnimm avenge depth of 100 feel That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs my have a miniIlium frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may be measund at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards. Minimum yard requirements arc as follows: (1) The fi'ont yard shall be not less than 20 feet, mcasur~ from the existing public right-of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way strut line as shown on any Spe~-~fic Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposexl structure. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 10% of the width of the lot, but not less than 3 feet in width in any event, and need not exceed a width of 5 feel Side yards on comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street line or from any futu~ stm~t line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structttm, upon which the train building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard nell not exceed 20% of the width of the lot. (3) The mar yard shall be not less than 10 feel (4) No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or mar yard without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance. Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). C Medium Hi ,h Density Residential Planning Areas 3, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22 & 23 Medium High Density Residential Zone _) The following regulations shall apply in all Mcclium High Density Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium High Density Residential Zone: (1) One family dwellings. (2) Two-family dwellings. (3) Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and country clubs. (4) Home occupations. (5) Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to-the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants arc employed and the on-site sign is unlightcd and does not exceed two square feet (2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of · 2 years in any event. (3) Nttrserics, horticultural. SECTION 6.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the Medium High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). a. Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet. Lot area shall be not less than 4,000 sq. ft. However, the lot area for two-fam~y dwellings shall bc not less than 3,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area -5- shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. The minimum average width of that portion of the lot to be used as a bu~ding site shall be 40 feet with a minimum average &pth of 80 feel However, for two-family dwelling lots, the minimum average width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum average depth of 75 feel That portion of a lot used for aceess on "flag" lots shall have a mintilllUlll width of 20 feel The minkhum frontage of a lot shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curv~inear streets may be measurrxl at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards. Minimum yard wxluirements are as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public right-of-way sm~et line or from any future public right-of-way su'eet line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less dim,. S feet. Side yards on corner and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is neanr the proposed stmctun:, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of the width of the lot. (3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In addition, the foliowing standard shall also apply: (a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or structures. (4) No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance. Automobile storage space shad be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Rivehide County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). Very High Density Residential Planning Areas 2 and 6 Very High Density Residential Zone _) The following regulations shall apply in all Very High Density Residential Zones: SECTION 8.1. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been obtained pursuant m the p~ovisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (2) (3) (4) (5) Any use permitted in the Medium High Density Residential Zone. Apa~ uuent houses. Nursery schools for preschool day care. Institutions for the aged licensed by the California State Deparm~-nt of Social Weftare or the County Department of Public Weftare. Congregate care residential facilities. Accessory buildings, to a specific permitw, d use, provided that the accessory building is established as an incident to a principal use and does not change the character of that use. On-site signs, affixed to building walls, stating the name of the structure, use or institution, not to exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the exterior face of the wall upon which the sign is located. The following uses .~hall be permitted provided a conditional use permit is obtained pursuant to this ordinance: (1) Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Depa,tment of Public Welfare during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. (2) Congregate care residential facilities, developed pursuant to City On:linance, County and State Codes and Ordinances. Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). -7- SECTION 8.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standan:Is of development shall apply in the V~n'y High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). The minimum lot ar~a shall be 7,200 squar~ feet with a mi~im~ml average width of 60 feet and a minimum average depth of 100 feet, unless diffmnt minimums ar~ specifically re, quir~l in a particular a~a. The minimum front and rear yanls shall be 10 feet for bUllclings that do not exceed 35 feet in height Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be set back from the front and rear lot lines no less than 10 feet plus 2 feet for each foot by which the height exceeds 35 feet The front sethack shall be n~asumd from any existing or futu~ public right-of-way smut line as shown on any specific st~et plan of the City, The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any r~corded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback ~quimment shall be the same as rutuimd for a front setback. The minimum side yard shall be 5 feet for buildings that do not exceed 35 feet in height Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be set back froth each side lot Hne 5 feet plus 2 feet for each foot by which the height exceeds 35 feet; if the side yard adjoins a strut, the side setback r~quimment shall be the same as required for a front setback No su'uctunl encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear' yard without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance. High density multi-family dwelling units shall be setback a minimum of 18 feet from any existing or future public right-of-way street line as shown on any specific street plan of the City. Said setback shall be applicable for front, rear and side yards should they adjoin a SireeL No lot shall have more than 50 percent of its net irma covered with buildings or stl~icP,,zres. The maximum density shall be twenty (20) units per acre. All buildings and su'uctures shall not exceed 50 feet in height Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Rivehide County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). -8- L Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Planning Areas 1, 27 and 36 Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Zone The following regulations shall apply in all Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Zones: SECTION 9.1. USES PERMITTED. The following uses are permitted, only in enclosed buildings with not more than 200 square feet of outside storage or display of materials appurtenant to such use, provided a plot plan shall have been approvcd pursuant to provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). (1) Ambulance services. (2) Antique Shops. (3) Appliance stores, household- (4) Art supply shops and studios. (5) Auction houses. (6) Auditoriums and conference rooms. (7) Automobile repair garages, not including body and fender shops or spray painting. (8) Automobile parts and supply stores. (9) Bakery goods distributors. (10) Bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to reta~ sales on the premises. (11) Banks and financial institutions. (12) Barber and beauty shops. (13) Bars and cocktail lounges. (14) Bflliard and pool halls. (15) Blueprint and duplicating services. (16) Book stores and binders. (17) Bowling alleys. (18) Catering services. (19) Cleaning and dyeing shops. (20) Clothing stores. (21) Confectionery or candy stores. (22) Costume design studios. (23) Dance halls. (24) Delicatessens. (25) Depa~uaent stores. (26) Drug stores. (27) Dry goods stores. -9- (28) Employment agencies. (29) Escort bm~aus. (30) Feed and grain sales. (31) Florists shops. (32) Food markets and fxozen food lockers (33) Gasoline servic~ stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premise~ consumption. (34) Gift shops. (35) Hotels, resort hotels and motels. (36) Household goods sales, including but not limit~t to, new and used appliances, furniture, carpets, draperies, l~amps, radios and television sets, including repair thereof. (37) Hobby shops. (38) Ice cream shops. (39) Ice sales, not including ice plants. (40) Interior decorating shops. (41) Jewelry stores, including incidental repairs. (42) Labor temples. (43) Laboratories, film, dental, medical, research or testing. (44) Laundries and laundromats. (45) Leather goods stores. (46) Liquor stores. (47) Locksmith shops. (48) MaLl order businesses. (49) Manufacturer's agent. (50) Market, food, wholesale or jobber. (51) Massage parlors, turkish baths, health centers and s~rnHar personal service establishments. (52) Meat markets, not including slaughtering. (53) Mimeographing and addressograph services. (54) Mormades. (55) Music stores. (56) News stores. (57) Notions or novelty stores. (58) Offices, including business, law, medical, dental chiropractic, architectural, engineering, community planning and real estate. (59) One on-site operator's residence, which may be located in a commercial building. (60) Paint and wallpaper stores, not including paint conlractors. (61) Pawn shops. (62) Pet shops and pet supply shops. (63) Photography shops and studios and photo engraving. (64) Plumbing shops, not including plumbing contractors. (65) Poullry markets, not including slaughtering or live sales. (66) Printers or publishers. (67) Produce markets. (68) Radio and television broaxtcasting studios. (69) Recording studios. (70) Refreshment stands. (71) Restaurants and other eating establishments. (72) Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama, music and swinnmlng. (73) Shoo stores and repair shops. (74) Shooshine stands. (75) Signs, on-site adveRising. (76) Sporting goods stores. (77) Stained glass assembly. (78) Stationer stores. (79) Stations, bus, railroad and taxi. (80) Taxiclermist. (81) Tailor shops. (82) Telephone exchanges. (83) Theaters, not including ctrive-ins. (84) Tim sales and service, not including recapping. (85) Tobacco shops. (86) Tourist information centers. (87) Toy shops. (88) Travel agencies. (89) Typewriter sales and rental, including incidental repairs. (90) Watch repair shops. (91) Wholesale businesses with samples on the premises but not including storage. (92) Car washes. (93) Fortune telling, spiritualism, or sin~ilar activity. (94) Recycling collection facilities. (95) Convenience stores, not including the sale of motor vehicle fuel. (96) Day care centers. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to City Ordinance. (1) Convenience stores, including the sale of motor vehicle fuel. (2) Gasoline service stations with the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off- premises consumption. (3) Liquid pen'oleum service stations with the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption, provided the total capacity of all tanks shall not exceed I 0,000 gallons. Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections a. and b. may be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Planning Director finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to die permit process which governs the category in which it falls. -11- SECTION 9.2. PLANNED CONIMERCI~ DEVELOP1VIENTS. Planned Cornmcrcial Developments lu~ permiu~d provided a Land division is approved pursuant to the provision of Riversid~ County Ordinance No. 460 (1991). SECTION 9.3. (DELETED.) SECTION 9.4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development are required in the Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Zones: There is no minimum lot area rP. xluimment, unless specifically ~quimd by zone classification for a particular area. There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed 35 feet in height except as required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be setback from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by which the height exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing public right-of-way street line un/ess a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an exisdng adjacent public right-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line. c. All buildings and structures shall not exceed 50 feet in height. Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feel -12- Day Care Center/Information Center Planning Area 34 Day Care Center/Information Center Zone The following regulations shall apply in all Day Car~ C, enterFufformation Center Zones: SECTION 8.1. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitrod provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Pdversid~ County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) (1) (3) (4) (5) Nursery schools for preschool day care. Institutions for the aged licensed by the California State Deparunent of Social Welfare or the County Dcpa~kuent of Public Welfare. Architectural, engineering and community planning offices; provided them is no outdoor storage of materials, ~quipmem or vehicles, other than passenger cars. Congregate care residential facilities. Information eent,~r. Accessory buildings, to a specific permitrod use, provided that the accessory building is established as an incident to a principal use and does not change the character of that use. On-site signs, affixed to building walls, stating the name of the structure, use or institution, not to exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area Of the exterior face of the wall upon which the sign is located. d. The following uses shall be permitted provided a conditional use permit is obtained pursuant to this ordinance: (1) Evening nm'sery school, child car~ and babysitting facilities, where unrelated chilch~n ar~ kept under supervision by a person licensed by die Smt~- I~partment of Social Welfare or Riverside County I)~parunent of Public Welfart during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. (2) Congtgate carc residential facilities, developed pursuant to City Ordinance, County and State C.~s and Ordinances. SECTION 8.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the Day Care Center/Information Center Zone. There is no minimum lot area requirement, unless specifically requim:l by zone classification for a particular area. -13- bo / There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed 35 feet in height except as ~xluired for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be setback from the fi'ont, r~r and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by which the height exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measureA from the existing public fight-of-way st~et line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; ff the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requixement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public fight-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured from the specific plan st~et line. All buildings and structu~s shall not exce~l 50 feet in height Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a miniw-m sight distance of 1,320 feet. Elementary School Planning Area 7 School/Medium Density Residential Zone The following regulations shall apply in all School/Medium Density Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMITtED. The following uses shall be permitted in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone: (1) One family dwellings. (2) Public schools. (3) Public parks and public playgrounds, goff courses with standard length fairways and country clubs. (4) Home occupations. The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops opented from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet (2) Temporary real estate wact offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years in any event. (3) Nurseries, horticultural. SECTION 6.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). a. Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet. Lot area shall be not less than 7,200 sq. ft. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. The minimum avenge width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 60 feet with a minimum avenge depth of 100 feet. That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. -15- The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 60 fe~t, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feel Lot frontage along curvilinear sur, ets may be measured at the building s~tback in accordance with zone development standards. Minimum yard requinments a~ as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than 20 feet, measuml from the existing public right-of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed su'ucture. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 10% of the width of the lot, but not less than 3 feet in width in any event, and need not exceed a width of 5 feel Side yanls on comer and revers~l comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing public right-of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structun, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of the width of the lot (3) The rear yard shall be not less than 10 feel (4) No sn'uctural encroachmenu shall be permitted in the front, side or mar yard without approval of a ~tback adjustment punuant to City Ordinance. Automobile storage space shall be pfovidecl as requirecl by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). Elementary School Planning Area 11 School/Medium Density Residential Zone -) The follov~ing regulations shall apply in all School/Medium Density Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMITFED. The following uses shall be pennitxed in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) One family dwellings. Two-family dwellings. Public schools. Public parks and public playgrounds, golf comes with standard length fairways and country clubs. Hom~ occupations. The following uses axe permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet (2) Temporary real estate lrac t offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years in any event. (3) Nurseries, horticultttral. SECTION6.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development shall apply in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone, except that pined residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet. Lot area shall be not less than 4,000 sq. ft. However, the lot area for two-family dwellings shall be not less than 3,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that potdon of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. -17- The minimum avenge width of that portion of the lot to be used as a building site shah be 40 feet with a minimum avenge clepth of 80 feet However, for two-family dwelling lots, the minimum avenge width shah be 40 feet with the same minimum avenge depth of 75 feet. That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shah have a minimum width of 20 feet. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may be n~asth-ud at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards. Minimum yard requirements are as follows: (1) The front yard shah be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public fight-of-way street line or from any futu~ public right-of-way street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feel Sicle yards on corner and reversed comer lots shah be not less than 10 feet from the existing public right-of-way street line or from any futm'e public right-of-way street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed su-ucrure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of the width of the lot. (3) The rear yard shah be not less than 15 feel In addition, the following standard shah also apply: ' (a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or Strlli3tlll~S. (4) No smactural encroachmerits shah be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without approval of a setback adjustment ptu'suant to City Ordinance. Automobile storage space shah be providrxt as requi_,r,d by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). -18- Elementary School and Junior High School Planning Areas 29, 30 and 32 School/Medium Density Residential Zone The following regulations shall apply in all School/Me, dim Density Residential Zones: SECTION 6.1. USES PERMITtED. The following uses shall be permitted in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) One family dwellings. Two-family dwellings. Public schools. Public parks and public playgrounds, golf comes with standard length fairways and country clubs. Home occupations. The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Oniinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet (2) Temporary real estate Ix~t offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years in any event. (3) Nurseries, horticultural. SECTION6.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standaids of development shall apply in the School/Me, dim Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). a. Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet. Lot axea shall be not less than 5,000 sq. ft. However, the lot area for two-family dwellings shall be not less than 4,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. -19- The minimum average width of that portion of the lot to be used as a building site shall be 45 feet with a minimum avenge depth of 85 feet. However, for two-family dwelling lOtS, the mini~nm avenge width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum avenge depth of 80 feet. That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lotS shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 45 feet, except that lotS fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a m~nimum frontage of 35 feel Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may be mcasurai at the bui]cting setback in accordance with zone development standards. Minim,m yard requirementS are as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measttred from the existing public fight of way street line or from any futu~ public right-of-way strict line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed slructurc. (2) Side yards on interior and through lotS shall be not less than 5 feel Side yards on comer and reversed corner lotS shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing public right-of-way sn-cet llne or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed sracture, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of the width of the lOL The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feel In addition, the following standard shall also apply: (a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net a~a covered with buildings or sWuctu~s. No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance. (3) (4) Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). C Neighborhood Park/Recreation Areas Planning Areas 12, 19, 24 and 37 Park Zone The fo//owing regulations shall apply in all Park Zones: SECTION 8.100. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Public parks. (2) Goff comes and appurtenant facilities, including clubhouses. A clubhouse is permitted to have customary retail shop and restaurant facilities. (3) Noncommercial COmmUllity association recreation and assembly buildings and facilities. (4) Lakes, including noncommercial fishing therefrom. (5) Picnic grounds. (6) Parking lots, only for above-listed permitted uses, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991), except that not less than five percent of the interior of such parking lots shall have distributed landscaping in addition to the landscaping requirements of Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). (7) Water wells an appurtenant facilities. (8) On-site identification signs, maximum size - 10 square feet. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted: (1) Riding academies and stables. SECTION 8.101. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Lot Area. This zone is to be applied to those areas within subdivisions and other residential developments that provide open space and recreational area and facilities for the project. Therefore, no minimum lot size is established for the zone. Yards. Whenever a building is to be constructed on a lot in this zone, it shall have a front yard, side yard and rear yard, each of which shall be not less than 25 feet. ff more than one building is constructed on one lot, there shall be not less than a 20-foot separation between the buildings. No structural encroackments shall be permitted in the front. side or rear yard without approval of a setback adjusm~ent pursuant to City Ordinance. -21- Trash Areas. All trash collection areas shall be enclosed with a solid fence or wall no less than 6 feet high. Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). All buildings or structures shall not exceed 40 feet in height. -22- - Communitv Open Space Planning Area 35 Community Open Space Zone The follox;ving regulations shall apply in all Community Open Space Zones: SECTION 8.100. USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991): (1) Undeveloped and manufactured open space. (2) Golf courses and appurtenant fadties, including clubhouses. A clubhouse is permitted to have customary retail shop and restaurant facilities. (3) Noncommercial community association recreation and assembly buildings and facilities. (4) Lakes, including noncommercial fishing therefrom. (5) Picnic grounds. (6) parking lots. only for above-listed permitted uses, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991), except that not less than five percent of the interior of such parking lots shall have distributed landscaping in addition to the landscaping requirements of Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). (7) Water wells an appurtenant facilities. (8) On-site identification signs, maximum size - I0 square feet. The following uses are pertained provided a conditional use permit has been granted: (1) Riding academies and stables. SECTION 8.101. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Lot Area. This zone is to be applied to those areas within subdivisions and other residential developments that provide open space and recreational area and facilities for the project. Therefore, no minimum lot size is established for the zone. Yards. Whenever a building is to be constructed on a lot in thi~ zone, it shall have a front yard, side yard and rear yard, each of which shall be not less than 50 feet. ff more than one building is constructed on one lot, there shall be not less than a 20-foot separation between the buildings. No structural encroachmerits shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard except without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance. -23- c. Trash Areas. All trash collection areas shalJ be enclosed with a solid fence or wall no less than 6 feet high. Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). All buildings or su'uctures shall not exceed 50 feet in height. ITEM 16 FINANCE OFFICER ~- ~,~'.~. CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning}'' ~ DATE: · August 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Variance No. 10 ~ A Fifty-Five (55) Foot High Freeway Oriented Sign for Creekside Texaco Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends the City Council: APPROVE Variance No. 10 with no additional requirement for extensions of time; or 2. APPROVE Variance No. 10 for a specific period of time. BACKGROUND The City Council, at their meeting on July 12, 1994, directed Staff to bring this item back before the Council as a public hearing item. This item is an issue because of a discrepancy about a section of an agreement between the applicant and the City of Temecula that waives his right for an extension to the Variance for a fifty-five (55) foot high sign. The sign was originally approved at this height for a period of two years. Upon review of those Council proceedings, it was clear that the Council placed no limitations on the applicants' right to file for an extension of time; the provision was included in the agreement by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1. City Council Agenda Report: July 12, 1994- Page 2 R:\STAFFRPT\10VAR.CC3 7118194 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT: JULY 12# 1994 R:\STAFFRPT~IOVAR.CC3 7/18/94 Idb 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Th0rnhill, Director of Planning-~' July 12, 1994 Reconsideration of Council Action on Variance No. 10/Appeal No. 25 Creekside Texaco Sign RECOMMENDATION: Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Variance No. 10/ Council Appeal No. 25 BACKGROUND On June 14, 1994, Staff, at the request of the applicant, brought this matter before the City Council for direction to Staff. The Council discussed the issues relating to the height of the sign and a motion was made by Councilmember Mu(toz to enforce the terms of the agreement to remove the sign and bring the sign into compliance with the height requirements of the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion, but the motion failed on a 2-2 vote (Councilmember Birdsall absent). As a result of the Council action and the fact that the two year approval period had lapsed, the City Attorney advised the Council that enforcement actions would be initiated to bring the height of the sign into compliance with the ordinance. Subsequent to the meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Stone advised staff that he would like the matter placed back on the Council calendar for reconsideration; his rationale for reconsideration of the matter was for the following reasons: City Staff did not have the opportunity to make a complete presentation to the council. The applicant requested a continuance in order to be better prepared. The City Council did not receive a copy of correspondence from the City to the applicant implying that the applicant had the option of applying for the extension to the two year approval period. Because the motion was deadlocked on a 2-2 vote with Councilmember Birdsall absent, the matter should be reconsidered with full Council participation. A~achments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. City Council Minutes dated June 14, 1994- page 1 City Council Staff Report dated June 14, 1994- page 2 Letter to Lou Kashmere dated June 23, 1992 regarding Appeal No. 25 - page 3 Planning Commission Minutes dated April 20, 1992- page 2 Letter to Staff dated May 11, 1994 - page 5 Memorandum of Agreement - page 6 R:\STAFFRPT\IOVAR~AoCP'~ 7/1/~ vw~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DATED JUNE 14, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\IOVARZSA.CC2 7/1/9~, yrd 2 r Ci~'v Council MinuTes COUNCIL BUSINESS 24. Entertainment Licensino Ordinance 25. City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report and recommended the addition of Section 9.10.090 providing that the Chief of Police may approve the license re-issue annually. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tom Stone to approve staff recommendation with the addition of Section 9.10,090 which provides language approved by the City Attomey permitting the Chief of Police to approve the license re-issue annually. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts None Birdsall Extension of Time for Variance No. 10 - a Fiftv-Five (551 Foot Hioh Freeway Oriented Sian for Creekside Texaco Director of Planning Thornhill reported the applicant has requested this matter be continued. Councilmember Mu~oz asked the reasoning behind this request. Director of Planning Thornhill explained that a memo sent to the applicant supports the applicant's re~luest and the applicant feels he has not had adequate notice of the meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Parks to continue the item. The motion died for a lack of a second. Lou Kashmere, 24115 Front Street, stated there is a conflict between the agreement he signed, a letter sent by staff and the understanding he had from the Council meeting when the Variance was granted. He asked, since no complaints have been received regarding his sign, that the variance be extended. It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to extend the meeting until 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall absent. Councilmember Mu~oz voiced his objection to granting a further variance, stating that Mr. Kashmere signed an agreement to voluntarily lower his current sign by 10 feet st the end of a two year period. Minutee%6~14~94 ol 1- 06/21/~4 Ir Mayor Pro Tem Stone said he does not want to set a precedence for future projects by extending the variance. Councilmember Parks stated the purpose for 8 variance is to consider individual cases and stated he does not have a problem with this sign. Mayor Roberrs said that because this property's elevation is at a lower level than surrounding properties, the sign is barely visable from the freeway and stated he feels the variance should be extended. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 10:26 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:27 PM. 27. Councilmember Parks moved the Temporary Variance be continued for 30 days. The motion died for a lack of a second. It was moved by Councilmember Muf~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to enforce the terms of the agreement and to require the applicant to bring the sign into compliance with the height requirements. Mayor Pro Tam Stone asked the motion be amended to allow Mr. Kashmere a six month period of time to show if any substantial loss of business occurs and the Council would re-evaulate the sign at that time. Councilmember Mu~oz did not agree to the amendment. The motion fared by the following vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone NOES: 2 COUN.CILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberrs ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall City Attorney Thorson advised the Council that the agreement provisions would be enforced by virtue of the time extension having expired and the fact that action to extend the variance did not carry. Financino and Construction Aoreement Reaardina the Widenino of Maroerits Road Between Rancho California Road and La Serene Way Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report. Councilmember Mu~oz stepped down from the podium due to e conflict of interest. Minutes%6~l 4~94 -12- 06/21/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATED JUNE 14, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\10VARZSA.CC2 71119~, v~u :~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTO.~EY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning June 14, 1994 'Extension of Time for Variance No. 10 - a Rfty-Five (55) Foot High Freeway Oriented Sign for Creeks(de Texaco Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Variance No. 10 BACKGROUND The applicant filed an application on February 18, 1992 for a variance to allow a 10' increase in the maximum permitted height of a fleeway oriented sign. Variance No. 10 was originally denied by the Planning Commission at their April 20, 1992 meeting. The recluest was for a fifty-five foot high sign. The applicant appealed this decision to the City Council through Appeal No. 25. The City Council upheld Appeal No. 25 and overturned the Planning Commission denial of Variance No. 10 at their June 9, 1992 meeting, The Variance was approved, subject to the following condition of approval: "The applicant agrees to enter into an agreement stipulating that if at the end of a two year period, the City Council does not grant an extension to this variance, the sign will automatically be reduced to a height of 45 feet at tSne owners expense." The two year period expires on June 9, 1994. The applicant submined a le~er to Staff dated May 11, 1994 (reference Attachment No. 1 ) requesting an extension of the variance "in order for his business to remain viable.' Staff met with the applicant because of differences in interpreting the original City Council approval of Variance No. 10. An agreement thbt the applicant executed (see Attachment No. 2 for memorandum of agreement) stated that he waived his rights for an extension of time for the project. However, this stipulation of the agreement appears to conflict with the Conditions of Approval stated 'previously. The condition impties that the Council could consider an extension of time, which appears to conflict with the agreement. Because of the ambiguity relative to the extension issue, Staff decided that the Council needed to provide some direction to staff. R:\STAFFRPT\10VAR,CC 5,r31/94 ktb Staff recluests that the Council provide the direction with consideration of the options listed below: 1. The Council may approve Variance No. 10 with no additional requirement for extensions of time. 2. The Council may provide the extension to Variance No. 10 at this time with a specified period of time. 3. The applicant may have to apply for an extension of time for Variance No. 1 O, which would be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. The applicant will need to re-apply for :a new variance regarding this project, which would be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council. RSCAL IMPACT None, R:\$TAFFRPT\IOVAR,CC 5/31/9~ k/b 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Le: I i ER TO LOU KASHMERE DATED JUNE 23, 1992 R:\STAFFRPT\lOVAR25A.CC2 7/1/9& vgu 4 /' 't CITY June 23, OF TEMECULA Mr. Lou Kashmc~, E.C.I. Incorporated 3517 West Commonwealth Avenue Fullerton, CA 91633 Subject: Appeal No. 25 for Variance No. I0, a proposed 55 foot high fmestand~g f~eWay sign. On June 9, 1992, lhe City Council of the City of Temecula upheld Appeal No. 25 and overnamed the Planning Comminsion de~inl of Va.rlmnce No. 10. Variance No. 10 is an application to construct a 55 foot high ft~eway sign at 29115 Front Stn~t. Ordinance No. 348 of the City of Temecula allows a maximum fn~way sign height of 45 f~t. The City Council approved Variance No. i0 for a 55 foot high freeway sign subject to the foilowing condition: I. "The applicant agx~es to enter into an agreement stipulating that if at the end of a ~o year l~riod, the City Counc~ does not grant an extension to thi~ variance, the sign will automatically be P,,duced to a height of 45 feet at the owner~ expense. Said agreement sh~ll be approved by the City A~_m'ney prior to the issuance of any building perinks for the sign in question. * Staff recommends that you submit'the required agreement for r~view as soon as possible, in order to expedite thi~ process. If you have any questions regarding this notification, plcase contact the City of Temccula Phnninov Depamnent at (714) 694-6400. Sincerely, Associate Plnnner Senior Planner vgw cc: Debi Belmonte, Building and Safety Depa, aucnt S~'S1'A!qqtYT%2~t,~NES$ PARK DIiV~ · TEMECUI.A, CAUFORNIA 9'2590 · PHONE (? 14) 694-1989 · FAX (714) 694-1999 ATTACHMENT N0.4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 20, 1992 R:\STAFFRPT\IOVAR~A.Cr'~ 7/1/96 v~ 5 FUBLIC HEARING ITEMS VARIANCE NO. 10 ADDlication for a heicht allowed hv hich freeway sign. Variance to exceed the maximum sicn Ordinance No. 348. mroDosed 55 foot located at 29115 Front Street. Mark Rhoades s-mm~viZed the staff report. Chairman Hodgland opened the public hearing at 6:40P.M. Lou Kashmere, 19555 Camino De Paz, Murrieta, stated that the request for a variance to the height was due to the fact that the elevation of the property to the east was 10 feet higher than his property, therefore, making a 45' high sign not visible to one side of the interstate. The Commission as a whole stated t hat they felt there was no exceptional circ-m~tances with the nature of this property to approve the variance. Commissioners Chiniaeff and Blair stated that they felt the applicant should pursue the placement of CalTrans logo signs along the interstate. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Fahey, to close the public hearing at 6:50 P.M. and Adomt Resolution No. 92-(next) denying Variance No. 10 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report. The motion was carried unanimously. CONDITIOI~&L USE PEEMIT NO. a, EXTENSION OF TIME Proposal to construct an Automotive located on the west side of Ynez Road, Service Center. East side of the Mark Rhoades s-mmarized the staff report. He advised that the applicant had requested that Condition No. 24 be deleted and it was staff's recommendation that Condition No. 24 be modified to read "Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit a landscape screening plan for approval by the Planning Director. Said landscape plan shall contain a combination of shrubs, ~rees and fences." Chairman Hodgland opened the public hearing at 6:55 P.M. · PCMIN4/06/92 -3- 4/09/92 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 L,- J I ER TO STAFF DATED MAY 11, 1994 R:\$TAFFRPT\10VAR25A,CC2 7/1/9/, vr. 6 May :' 1994 ECI 3517 W, Common Wealth Ave. FuliertC~, CA MAY 11 r "4 ~TY Of ILllf..~.UL~ City of Temecula, Planning Department ATTN: Mr. Gary Thornhill 43174 Buslness Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Sub3ect: Creekside Texaco &Food Mar~, variance Extension far sign- Dear Mr. Thornhit1, The C!ty Cou~cil approved variance ~10 =at a 55 foot high sign subject to the ~ollcwing condition: "The applicant agrees to enter into an agreement stipulating that if a= the end o~ a two year perlod, the City Co~cil does not grant an extension to this variance the sign wili be reduced to a helgh= of 45 feet". am requesting an extension of the variance in order for our bus:hess to remain viable. We have been quite fortunate to pu~np a large volume of fuel, which we belteve is due ~o our freeway visible signage. Eecause cf our volume, we receive a discount, which has been passed on =o theC z::Lze;_~ ~.= Temecula. it has also allowed us to make.eno~gh.mo~?y to participate in numerous local sponsorships an: cnarl:an~e The cost of fuel ~n Temecula is now lower =ban Sun City (even ~hough we pay more for fuel than they do]. The reason I mention Sun City, Is because many local residents use this as the location for "Bes% price" fuel purchases. Wlzhout :he freeway visihil:uy, we wauid pump much less fuel, which ~cull put us on par wlth nelghbcrhood gas eta%ions such as those in Callfcrn~an Oaks, az Coszoo Censer and Target Censer which are usually .03 to .09 cents h~gher per gallon. At present we are the hlghest volume Texaco West o~ the Misslssippl and nln=h in. the nation of which there are 14,0GO Texaco stations. W~th regard to further 3uszlficatlon for continuing our variance, we are a~ a much lower eleva~io~ (aprox 15') than the proper'-ies on :he east slde of Front Street. .Common sense says tha~ there should be an elevation difference adjustment based on this iaczcr. Please submit my request to the City Council. Lcu Ka~l%T. ere ,ireekslde Texaco A'I'i'ACHMENT NO. 6 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT R:\STAFFRPT\10VAR25&.CC2 711/~, vgv 7 RECORDING REQUF.~. ~ BY, AND WHEN R.F, CORD~fD, MAIL TO: C1TY OF~ 43174 B','~"~': Park Dziv~ _ ._ Tem~ P~llfOt-nia g2~90 WITH A COPY TO: Above for Rzcord:r's Use) I~'~IOILANDUM OF AG'Rs~s:M'I;~IT This Agreement is ente~l into as of the 6th day of July, 1992, by and between BCI ('Propc,ny Owner") and the City of Te,~_,l~; a California xntmici~l corporation (the "City"), with r=fcrencc to the following facts: Wnq;:RKAS, Property Owner is the owncr of rea1~ located at 29115 Front Str~ct C in the City of Tcmecula (the 'Pioserty") which is more parti~,l~rty de,u-iqaed in Exhibit "A', atuchcd hcr~to and made a part hereof; and - VCF~.~, on June 17, 1991, the City Council approvcd Conditional Use Pertnit No. 5 for ga. soljnc station use, autho~,4-g Property Owner to develop the P~ot~,rty in accordanc~ therewith; and VCtr~KAS, Property Owner deskes to erect and/or maintain an on-site pole sign in conjunction with the intended use of the Property; and Wl:rl~F.,t,S, unde~ the team of Se~don 19.4(a) of the Zoning Ox~aance of tim City of Tcmecula (which is contained as Pdvcrside County Ordinance No. 348, which the City adopted pursuant to City 0rdi4nancc No. 90-4), on-site pole signs within thc City are ~ to ahcight of 45 (45) fe~t or leax; and WFrk'IEAS, Property Owner has requested that the City Council grant a Variance f~m the terms of Section 19.3(a) to peait the erection an~or mainace of an on-si~ pole sign up to 55 fca in height (the 'Sign') and but not ~ to, co~ cos~, o,,min~er~tive costs and ammseys' f~, including City AtWrneys' fees, in zemoving the Si~ from the Property and/or f,,,~ng compliance with the terms of Section 19.4, the City shall maim demand upon Property Owner for payment. If pzotn'~ Owna. f~il~ to pay th~ costs inmm'ed by the C. ity within thiXty ('30) dayl Of ~ el~t~ demand is made, costsshallbeammsedagain~thePmPenYPun'uantmSention3a//~-5ofthe Gov~ment Code and sMll be tr~n~rn~t~nl to ttz lax collecinr for collection. 8. NOTiCE OFiNTENT TO F~rJ. OR T.I~A.~E. V~hm~c~/OwnerintuxcLs to ~ or ~,o~- the pmpe~, be shall zequest the ~ ~sun of the City to zllow t~ subseq,;_~ grantee to assume the oh~i,v~fin~s under thi_~ agx~menL The ~ ~h~H hnve the thi~ Agx~.mun or of ~t~ t~ Prc~rty and ~ ~ S~ ~m ~ ~. U~n ~g ~ ~.~ ~t of ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a no~ ~ ~ ~ ~n~nS ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ o~ ~ a ~ of ~ ~. 9. M]S~US HtOVBION. a. I/any ptovi~.__on of thi~ Al~t is sdjudged invalid, the x~naining provisions shall not be affected. b. Notice to Property Owner slall be considered to have been given zf'ter mailing, registm'ed or ~, renm~ rec~pt requested, to Fiulaeny Owner's last known address, or as shown on the lax mils. c. This wriling conml.~ a full, fin=l, and exclusive statement of the C Agreement of the parties. d. If the~ is mor~ than one (1) signer of ,hl, Agreement as Property Owuu, their obligations arc joint and several. e. The obligations upon Protn'ty Owner signing this Agreement termln,r~ as to it pemnally when it obtains the wrimm consent of the City to convey its interest in the Property and files for rr. ord with the County Recorder a copy of a,~ignmerlt Of thi~ Agr~emenL In such a case the new owner tak~ fit~ subject to the requizrAnents of this Agl~menL f. The Property C3~er appoints the City as its attorney-in-fact to do all and things which the City considen n~'~ry to bring the Sign and the Driveway compliance with the. terms of the Code. g. ~lo alteration, variation, or menmeat of the terms of thi_~ Agrr..mcnt shall be valid unless m-c~ in writing and signed by the parties hercto, and no oral unci~st~nHing or agr~,'ment not incozpcrratod haein ~I1 be binding on either of the parti~ he:'~to. h. P, opaxy Owner .thall not ~,~gn this Agn~ment without the prior wfitm consent of the City. Any attempt to assign without such consent shall be void and confer no fights on any third party. By:_ /- k-~- . Name: Inuis l~hmcrc Tiffs: Pr~sid~lt N~m~: Tail: Diz~ctor of Phnning STATE OF CArl'~ORIq'IA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF RIV~E ) On July 13, 1992, before me, the unde4~nect, a Notmy Public in and for said personally appared Louis Kashmere personally known to me or proved to me on the bz..,is of satisfactory evidenc~ to be the person whose name is subscribed to within the inm'ament and acknowledged to me that he v,~cuted the same in his authoxiz~d capacity. WITNESS my hand and offxchl seal. ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~, FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk August 9, 1994 Planning Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission. Appoint two members to serve a full three-year term on the BACKGROUND: The expired terms of Commissioners Hoagland and Salyer were advertised in accordance with the Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments. The applications received have been forwarded to Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Parks for a recommendation. Their recommendations are as follows: Mayor Pro Tern Stone recommends the appointment of Marcia Slavin and Andrew Webster. Councilmember Parks recommends the appointment of Marcia Slavin and re- appointmentofCommissionerJohnHoagland. TherecommendationtoappointMarciaSlavin is based on her involvement in the community for 19 years, in such activities as the incorporation effort, preservation and master planning of the sports park and her local homeowners association. The recommendation for appointment of Andrew Webster is based on his strong engineering background and experience with Rancho Water District and his familiarity with the City's General Plan. The recommendation to reappoint Commissioner Hoagland is based on his dedicated four (4) years of service on the commission and his level of interest in the development and balanced planning of the City. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of July 15, 1994. Also attached are an application from Commissioner Salyer with a note indicating the first application he sent to us was apparently not received by the deadline and an application which was not filed until July 19, 1994. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ANDREW WEBSTER 30281 TRADEWATER COURT CITY OF TEMECULA .~~'~ "~,..~ ,,..,.....,: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 1½ WORK PHONE: (909) 676-4101 ADDRESS: TEMECULA, CA 92591 HOME PHONE: (909) 695-!909 OCCUPATION: CIVIL ENGINEER EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: RANCliO CALIFORNIA WATER DTSTRTCT 42135 WINCHESTER ROAD, TEMECULA CA EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: BACHELOR OF SCIENCE - CIVIL ENGINEERING CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT LONG HEACH (1988) REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER - STATE OF CALIFORNIA 92590 (1991) LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: NONE ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): AMBRICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHFaN CALIFORNIA, EABITAT FOR HUMANITY - INLAND V/U.f. EY C~[APTER BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): SEE ATTACHED SHEET I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-O0 1 Andrew Webster 30281 Tradewater Court Temecula, CA 92591 I wish to serve on the Planning Commission to participate in the local government and to perform an active role in the development of this community. My qualifications for the Planning Commission include excellent communication skills, extensive engineering background, familiarity with the City's General Plan including planned developments in the area, knowledge of local water, sewer, reclaimed water and storm drainage issues as well as experience with land use requirements. As a senior engineer for a local public agency, I have a unique insight with respect to the interrelation of various projects and the ability to assess the impact of projects to the community. My background has also provided significant experience in the mitigation of project impacts including visual, biological and archeological impacts. Also, I have experience with large revegetation programs with native plant materials as well as extensive use of architectural materials to improve aesthetics. COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: EDUCATION~.L BACI~GRO! LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: {Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for ' blicity purposes. S,GNATU · DATE: 0] - t)-'T/ : Applications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk'a Office, 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-001 CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION /' ~?$~Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: Planning Comm~ ssion NAME: Charles W. (Bill) Saatboff YEARS RESIDENT ADDRESS: 31110 Avertida Buena Suerte OF TEMECULA: Four Temecu]a. CA 9259]+ HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE: 909-676-9281 909-676-7622 OCCUPATION: Self-Employed Franchise Owner H & R Block Lake Elsinore 1981 to Present - Temecula 1986 to Present - Murrieta 1993 to Present EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 27644 Ynez Road M-5 Temecula, CA 92591 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: High School Graduate - 1948 University of Io~a - 1948-1949 Drake University - 1951 Accounting Major LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: Lake Elsinore Planning Commissioner 07/01/82 - 07/8/86 Lake Elsinore Planning Commissioner 07/05/88 - 08/15/90 Lake Elsino~e Planning Commission Chairperaon 08/15/90 - e7/01/92 ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Liason Representative to Corporate for Southern Calif. H & R Block Franchises Inland Societa of Tax Consultants - Past Director BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC {Use additional paper if necessary): I wish to serve on the Temecula Planning Commission to preserve and elevate the integrity of commercial. and .industrial development and to stimulate the integration of a quality mix of lower, medinm and higher cost residential development. You are welcome to verify my qualifications for this position by contacting the present Lake Elsinore City Manager, Mr. Ron Molendyke at 674-1324 and the present Lake Elsinore Mayor, Mr. Gary Washburn at 674-1324. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forme/COM-O01 /e"raSg Co t, u b,',,, t~ APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIO~ Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecuia COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: HOME PHONE: ~-~7~ OCCUPATION: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: ~ WORK PHONE: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: ~ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Z:>/,,/,,,o,,Z'/ LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, servicel: BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC {Use additional paper if I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this ,..=: _. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temec~2390 (714) 694-1989 2/forrndCOM-O01 Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temec COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: ING CONHIS NAME: YEARS RESIDENT Marcia Slaven ADDRESS: 30110 La Primavera St., Temecula OF TEMECULA: HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE: 676 5887 676 5887 OCCUPATION: Property management EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: self/home EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: I am presently a full time student at Mt. San Jacinto College. My educational goals include an AA degree in Humanities, to be followed by a Bachelor degree majoring in English and/or Psychology. 19 years LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: I have worked extensively on a committee formed by myself to preserve and construct additional park area at the Sports Park. I have also served on the citizens committee for the General Plan. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: {Professional. technical. community. service): Community Association Institute and a newly formed women's organization on the college campus BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): See attached. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. SIGNATUR~2~,C~. ~~.~DATE: July 19, 1994 PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/formslCOM-O01 Attachment Slaven I enjoy public service and I am interested in the well-planned and well-balanced growth and development of the City of Temecula. I have recently been recognized by the American Planning Association of the Inland Empore Section for Distinguished Leadership in a citizen category. My active involvement in the incorporation process of the ,city and my current interest and involvement with the Sports Park expansion have provided a hands on education regarding the General Plan and city government policies. ITEM 18 FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Community Service Funding Program Representative RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint a Council representative to assist the Finance Officer and Community Services Director in reviewing the Community Service Funding Program applications. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the City Council direction the 1994-95 Community Service Funding Program applications have been available since July 25, 1994. Completed applications from non-profit organizations, et al are due August 25, 1994. Each year the applications are reviewed by the Finance Officer, Community Services Director as well as a Council representative. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ITEM 19 APPROVAL FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: / /?~ City Manager/City Council Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 9, 1994 Proposed Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program PREPARED BY: ~;~,~' Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program. BACKGROUND: On June 23, 1994 the Public/Traffic Safety Commission endorsed the adoption of the Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Program. Across the nation, civic organizations and businesses are "adopting" sections of highways, roads, streets, and center medians. These "adoptions" include not only litter removal, but tree planrings, center median landscaping, and graffiti removal. The proposed Keep Temecula Clean "Adopt-A-Street" Progarm is designed to enhance the community. The proposed program encourages and supports clean-up and beautification efforts by citizens and the business community. In addition to the enhanced clean-up efforts of the program, one of the primary goals of this program is to provide a means for youth groups to participate in and contribute to the beautification of their community. The youth groups are encouraged to obtain a sponsor for their "adopted" location. The sponsor may provide support by assisting in the clean-up efforts or may provide a monetary donation to be used for supplies or any use the group may deem necessary. In turn, the sponsor's business will be acknowledged on the "Adopt-A-Street" sign. Initially fifteen locations throughout the City have been selected for the program. Currently, City crews can only service these locations on an on-call basis at an annual cost of $5,600. The fifteen locations identified in the program, when "adopted", will be "cleaned-up" four (4) times per year. The initial cost for the proposed program is approximately $3,500 and will r: ~aOdrpt\94~OBO9~ADOPTSTR. PRO include thirty speciality signs, trash bags, and Workers' Compensation Insurance for volunteers. Costs for the second year are projected at $2,000. Attached for your review and comments is a "Adopt-A-Street" program guideline. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Sign Maintenance Account 100-164-601- 5244 and Street Maintenance Account 100-164-601-5218for the proposed program. r.\agdrpt~94%08Og~ADOFi'STR. l~O CITY OF TEMECULA]KEEP TEMECULA CLEAN ADOPT-A-STREET PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION Across the nation, civic organizations and businesses are 'adopting' sections of highways, roads, streets, and center medians. These 'adoptions' include not only liner removal, but tree plantings, center median landscaping, and graffiti removal. There are two ways to participate in this program: Volunteer manpower and/or · If a business arranges to have an organization do the actual clean-up and make a donation directly to them and/or just make available all supplies. (i.e. orange vests, trash bags, litter pickets) LfI'IER, WEED AND 1VF/SCELLANEOUS DEBRIS REMOVAL · Participants agree to pick-up liner and miscellaneous debris from a section of roadside (no less than 1 mile, but no more than 2 miles) for a minimum of one year. Participants do all the debris pick-up on the roadside and parkway. Participants may not pick-up debris in the center medians (unless prior arrangements have been made). Debris should be picked up from both sides of the highway. ,- Debris must be picked up no less than 4x's a year (dates will be set up by Keep Temecula Clean Coordinator) All organiTations are requested to put liner and trash with home or business garbage for their scheduled weekly refuse collection. Arrangements can be made to have large pieces of debris transported to the City's corporate yard for dumping. LANDSCAPING · If your budget allows, this is encouraged. GRAP~tTI REMOVAL If graffiti removal is necessary in your area we can supply the paint. RECOGNITION SIGNS The civic Organization or Business' name will be noted on two recognition signets for your project. The signs will measure 30' x 30' and may be mounted on existing poles at the selected section. KEEP TEMECULA CLEAN ADOPT-A-STREET APPLICATION Name of Adopting Organization, business or individuals: Person who can be contacted: Address: Telephone Number: Number of participants: Age of participants (Organization only): ('If you are an adult organization, you need not answer this question) List three locations you may wish to adopt. Start with your first selection: 1. 2. 3. Recognition Signs will read: Adopt-a-Street Program Next Mile(s) Adopted by: NAME OF ORGANIZATION OR BUSINESS There will be 2 signs located at each end of the adopted street. Please return this form w: CITY OF TEMECULA Brad Buron Maintenance Superintendent 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 91590 ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY PROGRAM LOCATIONS AND LIMITS Street Mercedes Street Moreno Road Front Street Rancho Ca. Rd. Margarita Road Ynez Road Rainbow Cyn. Rd. Pala Road Rancho Vista Ynez Limits 2nd Street to Moreno Road including side streets Front Street to Front Street Rancho California Road to Via Montezuma Via Montezuma to Winchester Road Front Street west to City Limit Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway Moraga to Margarita Road Rancho California Road to La Serena Way La Serena Way to S. General Kearney Palm Plaza to Winchester Road Temecula Creek Inn to City Limit Rainbow Canyon to Wolf Valley Ynez to Mira Loma Rancho Highland to Pauba Mile(s) 2 I One side only 1 One side only 2 2 2 1 2 1,5 One side only 1 1,5 pwO5~roads\adopt 011194 ~I~P ~E~fi~U~J, t"~,E~id~u t~[.~.AN UP PROGRAM The City of Tamsouls ("the City") is sponsoring the "Keep Te~ecula Clean" Clean Up Program ("=he Program") to remove litter, weeds and debris from roadsides and parkways within the city. As part of the Program, private citizens may participate as volunteers in the litter removal. =n order for persons over the age o~ 18 to participate in the Program, they must sign the following release which relieves ~he City from any responsibility for any injuries, losses and damages which the participant may receive or cause any other individual or entity, including the city, as a result of their participation in ~he Program. WAIVE~ AND P~.~&-qE FROM LI/~RILITY AND INDRMNI~"/AGREENR~4T In consideration of being permitted to participate in the Program, I, , ("participant") do hereby agree as follows: 1. I fully understand my participa%ion in the Program is permitted only because I agree to waive and release any potential claims against the City, its officers and employees. I fully understand that I will participate in the Program without direct City supervision and without traffic control which may subject me to some degree of risk to my personal safety. I have reviewed and fully understand the City's safety requirements regarding the Program and wil! comply with those requirements and will bear full responsibility for my personal safety as a Participant in the Program. 2. I hereby WAIVE and RELEASE any and all claims, rights and/or causes of action which I now have or may have against the City, its officers and employees FOR ANY ANO ALL CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DANAGES which may occur to or be inflicted upon me or my property, including but not limited to those which relate to, or which may in any way arise out of any negligence of the City, its officers and employees in connection with my participatAon in ~he Program. 4. I hereby INDEMNIFY and HOLD HARMLESS the City, its officers and employees from any and all CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES to the person or proper~y of any individual or entity which may in any way arise out of my participation in =he Program. 5. I acknowledge that I am in good physical condition and am physically able to participate in the Program and am willing to undertake such participation at my own risk. 6. I am over eighteen (18) years of age, and if married, have executed this document on behalf of myself, my spouse and the marital community which we compromise. I 7. The contents of this document shall be forever b~ndin~ upon me, my dependents, heirs, personal repreeQn~atives and estnte. 8. I HAVE READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT, UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS, KNOW OF THE THUTH/q]LNESS THEREOF, AND HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE SAME. IN WITNESS OF MY AGREEMENT to the loregoing, I hereby execute this documen~ on the day of 19 THIS IS A pl~T,F.~qM Slgna~ure of Par~icipanE Printed Name of Participant Address of Participant City Phone Witness to Signature of Participant The City of Temecula ("the City") is sponsoring the "Xeep Te~ecula Clean" Clean Up Program ("the Progrem*') to remove litter, weeds and debris from roadsides and parkways within the City. As par~ of the Program, private citizens may participate as volunteers in the litter remove1. In order for persons under the age of 18 (nminor.) to participate in the Program, =he parent[s) or legal guardian(s) of a minor must sign the following release which relieves ~he City from any responsibility for any injuries, losses end damages which ~he minor may receive or cause any other individual or entity, including ~he City, as a result of the minor's participation in the Program. WArV~. AND pm.~-msB FROM LTARILITY AND INDEMNITY (FOR VOT.nNTB~-~ UN~ T~ AGB OF 181 In consideration of ("Minor") being permitted to participate in the Program, I, (we3 the undersigned Parent, Parents or Legal Guardian(s) of Minor do hereby agree as follows: 1. I [we) fully understand Minor's participation in the release any potential claims against the its officers and employees. I (we) [ully understand that Minor will participate in the Prograa without direct City supervision and without traffic control which may subject Minor to some degree of risk to his/her personal safety. I [we] have reviewed and fully ~ understand the City's safety requirements regarding the Program and will comply with those requirements and will bear full responsibility for Minor's personal safety as a participant in the Program. 2. I [we] hereby WAIVE and RELEASE any and all claims, rights and/or causes of action which I [we] now have or may have against the City, its officers and employees FOR ANY AND CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIES, LOSSES OR DAMAGES which may occur to or be inflicted upon Minor, including but not limited to those which relate to, or which may in any way arise out of any negligence of the City, its officers and employees in connection with MinorJs par~cicipation in the Program. 4. I [we] hereby INDEMNIFY and MOLD HARMLESS the City, Its officers and employees from any and all CLAIMS, SUITS, LIABILITY, INJURIESt LOSSES OR DAMAGES to the parson or property of any individual or entity which may in any way arise out of Minor's participation in the Program. 5. I [we] acknowledge that Minor is in good physical condition and is physically able to par~ioipate in the Program. 6. Z [~e] am [are] ove~ eighteen (~9) yeats o~ age, and i~, married, I [we] have executed this document on behalf of myself, my spouse and the marital community which we compromise. 7. The contents Of this document shall be forever binding upon me [us], my [our] dependents, heirs, personal representatives and es~a~e. 8. I [wz] HAVE Pa~AD T~IS ENTIRE DOCUMENT, UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS, KNOW OF THX TRUTHFULNESS THEREOF, AND HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF TH~ SAME. IN WITNESS OF MY [OUR] AGREEMENT to the fore~oinq, hereby execute this document on the day of t 19 z Cwel signature of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) Printed Name of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) Address of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) ciuy Phone Witness to Signature of Parent(s) or Legal Guardian(s) California Family Code Section 6901. Dental care t'Dental carew means X-ray examination, anesv~hetic, dental or surgical diagnosis or treatment, and hospital care by a dentist licensed under the Dental Practice Act. California F~mtly Code SeCtion 6902. Nedical care 'JHedicel care~ ~eans X-ray examination# anesthetic, medical or surgical 'dia~nosis or treatment, and hospital care under the general cr special supervision and upon the advice of or to be rendered by a physician and surgeon licensed under the Medical Practice Act. pARRNT'S D~.F. GATION OF AUTHORITY TO CONSENT TO M~.DICAL OR Dl~eT~v, TR~.~T~R~T yOR WFNOR CHIT.~ I[we], the undersigned Parent, Parents or Legal Guardian(s) of , ("Minor"), do hereby consent to The Minor's participation in the "Keep Temecula Clean" Clean-Up Program ("the Program") and should the need arise~ do hereby authorize the City of Temecula city.), its officers and employees =o consent to any Medical care or Den=el care to be rendered to tale Minor. in connection with ~he Minor's participation ~he Pr am. (MediCal care and Dental care are defined in California Fram~11y COde Sections 6901 and ee02# copies of these definitions appear on the back of this form.) It is understood that this authorization is given in advance of any specific diagnosis, treatment or hospital care being required but is given to provide authority and power to render care which may be deemed advisable. It is understood that effort shall be made to contact the Undersigned prior to rendering treatment to the MAnor, but that any of the above treatments will not be withheld for Eailure to reach the undersigned. The underSigned will not hold liable the City, its officers or employees for any Medical care or Dental care rendered to the Minor and will reimburse The City for any medical or other expenses incurred in connection with the care of the Minor. This authorization is given pursuant to Section 691o of the Family Code of California and remains effective until revoked. Parent's or Legal Guardian's Signature [Arent'e Phone Number(s} Date Physician/Dentist Name(s) Address(as) Phone Number(s) Is Minor ~aking any me~ication? No Name Of Medication(s): A]lergiC Restricted activities are: Yes ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUI, A AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council S~:~awn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services ary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Temecula Town Association Assistance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider to provide a loan of $68,000 to the Temecula Town Association based on a value-in-usa appraisal. BACKGROUND: On May 24, 1994, the City Council approved a loan of $68,000to the Temecula Town Association at 6% interest for two (2) years, contingent upon a low cost appraisal to determine the market value of the TTA's Community Center property. According to the City's appraiser, Mr. John Neet, the TTA property can not be appraised from a market value standpoint because of the existing deed restriction, which requires the land be used for public purposes only, and the general plan designation for the site, which is public/institutional. This means that since the property can only be used for public purposes, the only potential buyer could be a public agency. Further, even if the deed restriction was removed from the property, the general plan designation would still take precedence over the site. Therefore, based on current City Council action, staff is unable to process the loan. However, the property can be appraised from a value-in-use standpoint. This means that although the property ~;annot be supported by a market value appraisal, the property and the cost of improvements do have value to the City of Temecula. Mr. Neat has determined that the land and costs of constructing the TTA Community Center is $450,000. In other words, it would cost the City $450,000to construct the improvements that are currently on the TTA property. The TTA is willing to provide the City with a 2nd trust deed on the Community Center to provide additional security to the City for the loan. In March, 1995, the 1st trust deed is expected to be repaid, and the City will then hold a first trust deed on the property. FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, loan funds of $68,000 will be provided from the General Fund. The interest rate charged to the TTA is slightly higher than the City's current investment earnings rate. ITEM 2 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE'~, FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager August 9, 1994 Disposal of Surplus Equipment and Supplies RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT THROUGH DONATION TO CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS OR CITY-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS BACKGROUND: As a result of the recently completed lease negotiations for municipal office space, the City is vacating Building D in the Windsor I complex, and assuming space E-106 in the same complex. The City will have 1760 sq.ft. for storage rather than the current 6,800 sq.ft. After August 15th, the City will incur a S 150/day charge for the continued use of Building D. Because of the greatly reduced storage space, there is a need to quickly dispose of equipment and supplies that the staff has previously identified as surplus. Most of the identified surplus is office furniture donated to the City at the time of incorporation. The City has adopted the use of modular systems furniture in its municipal offices, leaving the donated furniture as obsolete and surplus. Assuming that there is a need for this furniture in the charitable non-profit corporations, or City-sponsored non-profit organizations in the City, staff has recommended donation as an expedient means of disposal. Staff will attempt to finalize disposal of non-donated surplus by bulk bid. The inclusion of City-sponsored non-profit organizations in the resolution is intended to include the Mainstreet Association as a potential recipient of some of the surplus furniture. A specific listing of surplus equipment and supplies is being compiled and will be provided under separate cover to the City Council. FISCAL ANALYSIS: Recognizing that charitable and City-sponsored non-profit organizations provide numerous hours of service or work that directly benefits the City, and which the City might otherwise have to provide, the City Council finds in the attached Resolution that the maximum return on the disposal of this donated surplus equipment and supplies would be through donation to non-profits located within the City of Temecula. Proceeds from the sale of the remaining surplus will be treated as revenue to the City's General Fund. RESOLUTION NO.94- A RF_.SOLU~ON OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING FOR T!:ff. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS SUPPLIES AND EQUII'lvrF, NT THROUGH DONATION TO CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS OR C1TY-SPONSORRB NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS W!~REAS, during the period immediately following incorporation, the City of Temecula received donations of office furniture with which to conduct its municipal business; and WHEREAS, the City has used a modular systems approach to its office furniture, thereby rendering the donated furniture obsolete; and WHE~AS, the City wouM incur additional expense associated with the continued storage of surplus furniture; and WHEREAS, Section 3.28.330 of the Temecula Municipal Code allows the City Manager to authorize the disposal of surplus supplies and equipment in a manner, "which, in his or her judgement, provide the maximum return to the City; and WHEREAS, charitable and City-sponsored non-profit corporations perform countless hours of community service, or provide benefit to the City, which the City of Temecula might otherwise have to provide; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes there is a need for office furniture by charitable non-profit corporations based in the City of Temecula. NOW, TItEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. In association with the recent signing of the new lease for municipal office space, the City Council authorizes the City Manager to dispose of surplus supplies and equipment through donation to charitable non-profit corporations or City-sponsored non-profit organizations maintaining an office in the City of Temecula. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that because of the hours of service rendered in the community by charitable non-profit corporations and the benefits derived from City- sponsored non-profit organizations, which the City might otherwise have to provide, this one time donation of surplus supplies and equipment will provide a maximum return to the City. Section 3. The City Manager is authorized to dispose of remaining surplus supplies and equipment consistent with the Municipal Code. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of August, 1994. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor ATIEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF TENIECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof head on the 9th day of August, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: '. COUNCILI~,MBERS: COUNCILM~MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILIvn=,MBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Consideration of Financial Support for the Economic Development Corporation PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Consider the level of funding for the Economic Development Corporation. BACKGROUND: separate cover. Staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to you under swj APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Economic Development Program for FY 1994-95 RECOMMENDATION: Corporation. Determine level of City contribution to the Economic Development DISCUSSION: At the meeting of August 2, 1994 the City Council reached consensus on continued financial support of the Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation but deferred a decision on the funding level until the meeting of August 9, 1994. City Council directed staff to work with the Economic Development Corporation to identify the proposed impact of funding at different levels. The EDC has provided the following information based on their FY 1995 budget (see Attachment I). A. Funding level - $80,000 The attached budget contemplates an ~80,000 contribution from the City and would provide a full-time Executive Director, Associate Director and part-time Secretary. Also included in the budget is an estimate for office rent. The EDC board is actively looking for donated office space and have identified a possible location. B. Funding level - $55,000 This level of funding would provide a reduced level of service by making the following expenditure reductions: 1 ) Downgrade the Associate Director position $10,000 2) Eliminate the part-time Secretary 7,300 3) Obtain free rent 7,000 4) Obtain sponsorships for quarterly luncheons 700 TOTAL REDUCTIONS $25,000 C. Funding level - $40,000 This contribution level would require the same reductions as Alternative B plus a $10,000 reduction in the salary of the Executive Director. D. Funding level - $10,000 This funding level would maintain the current level of EDC operations. Based on our review of the EDC budget, staff recommends Alternative B. This funding level would provid'e for an experienced director at an appropriate salary. In addition to coordinating the efforts of the EDC volunteers, the Director would have greater flexibility in dealing with confidential leads than City staff can provide, due to the requirements of the Brown Act and Freedom of Information Act. It should be noted that at any funding level, the EDC has committed to raise 50% more revenues from dues compared to FY 1994. Additionally, the membership committee will do all they can to exceed the estimate. It is not reasonable to expect, however, that a level of funding greater than a 50% increase from membership fees could occur. In response to the City Council's interest in expanding the EDC's focus to include commercial and retail activity and to concentrate on primarily the Temecula area, EDC Board members felt that their Board would approve such a change based on funding at levels A, B, or C. Staff has also enclosed the August 2nd Staff Report. The Council voted 4-0 to adopt option one as described in that document with the level of funding to be determined at tonight's meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the FY 1995 budget for the recommended funding level. Attachment: Temecule Murrieta EDC Proposed Budget FY 1994/95 Attachment I TEMECULA MURRIETA EDC PROPOSED BUDGET JULY 1, 1994 - JUNE 30, 1995 REVENUE: Dues - Private renewals Dues - Private new Membership dues - Cities Riverside County In-kind sponsorships Interest income Special events TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES: General & Administration Salary - Executive director Salary - Associate Director Salary - Secretary Payroll taxes Employee benefits Amortization Depreciation Office supplies Postage Telephone Office rent Utilities Professional services - in-kind Dues and subscriptions Miscellaneous Insurance Professional developement Travel & promotion Total G & A Outreach Postage Show registrations (outside funding) Show travel Hosting 54,000 25,000 80,000 7,500 4,800 500 10,000 181,800 65,000 33,000 7,280 8,300 4,000 44 1,350 3,000 1,200 3,000 8,400 1,200 4,800 2,1 O0 600 4,000 1,000 1,200 149,474 800 0 2,000 1,200 3,700 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council - Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer ' August 2, 1994 Economic Development Program for FY 1994-95 RECOMMENDATION: That the City CounCil review the materials provi~led concerning the economic development function and provide direction concerning the proposed alternatives. DISCUSSION: In connection with the preparation of the City's General Plan, staff developed an economic development element, which Council adopted in November 1993. The element includes goals and policies, as well as implementation programs (See Attachment I). The purpose of this workshop is to discuss and make recommendations concerning the way in which these programs are carried out. We have provided information about the participating organizations, their roles in the past and the City's contributions to these efforts. In addition, we have provided information regarding current requests and alternatives. Participants The City of Temecula is fortunate to have a strong volunteer corps in all areas of community activity. As we discuss the role of each organizational participant in economic development, we need to remember that this'service is rendered almost entirely unpaid. It is staff's desire to continue to maximize their potential and build on the efforts of these organizations. Cil;y - The City Council has the responsibility for setting policy and approving programs to carry out the adopted policy. This includes staffing and funding those activities that serve the public good. The City Manager orchestrates the work, program and delegates the work to appropriate departmental staff or consultants. For three years until January 1994, the economic development function was carried out by the City Manager and a consultant, Ken Dodd of Final Touch Marketing. Their focus was on national advertising, video production and distribution, trade show representation and public relations. The cost of the program (not including the City Manager's salary) for three years totalled $489,262as shown on Attachment III. As a result of these expenditures, the City still has the video, fact packs, labor study and trade show booth for future use. R:iNORTONLt,4GENDASIEDp. AGN 1 7/29/94 To date, as a direct result of advertising efforts there has been one confirmed business relocation to Temecula, Tension Envelope. Since February 1994, economic development activities have been carried out by the City Manager and Finance Officer, as follows: CityManager- Public relations/City promotion; negotiations with developers on retail site development; City representative to site selection committees. Finance OffiCer - Provide technical assistance for re'location; prepare fiscal analysis for incentives; follow through on financing arrangements; pursue assistance from other agencies at all levels of government; point of contact for troubleshooting. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - The mission of the Chamber is "to promote the economic environment of all member businesses and by doing so will support the programs which preserve and improve the quality of life." The Chamber primarily supports small businesses and provides walk-in visitor and tourist information. The City has made annual contributions of $45,000 and the chamber has made a similar request for FY 1995 (see Attachment III). Their request and consideration of their contract will be brought back in a separate staff report. Temecula Valley Film Council (Film Council) - "The mission of the Film Council is to market Temecula as a desirable, cooperative, efficient and multi-faceted location destination for the film, television and advertising industry . . . to further the interests of Temecula Valley economic development by attracting the film industry to our area, to act as a liaison between the film industry and the community, to provide a focal point for all film related inquiries, to prepare and provide a location library, production and service information to the industry, to educate local merchants to the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the relocation of film companies to the area to generate new jobs." Contributions to the Film Council have been made for special work products, such as the Production Guide. This year th~ Council has committed to provide office space in City Hall. Attachment III contains the detail of the payments. Murrieta/Temecula Group (MTG) - MTG has a broader mission than economic development, however, one of their key objectives is "support for the economic development efforts of the two cities, county and the local economic development organizations." This group was targeted in the EDC proposal as the legislative advocate for economic development. MTG has never requested any financial assistance from the City. Inland Emoire Economic Partnership (IEEP) - Any local economic development effort must be coordinated with the County and surrounding cities. This was never more evident than in the negotiations with International Rectifier. Without the support of neighboring cities, the loan guarantee would not have been possible. Staff is currently working with IEEP and other local cities on a regional marketing effort. We will bring the proposal back to the Council when it is complete. R:INORTONL~AGENDAStEDP. AGN 2 7/29/94 Temecula-Murrieta EDC (EDC) - According to their mission statement, the purpose of the EDC is "to promote growth, development and retention... to improve business conditions and job growth .~. and to assist existing employers in the area and to encourage their expansion and growth within the area." The EDC primarily consists of commercial real estate brokers, as well as the Area Manager of Southern California Edison. The EDC has several subcommittees that function effectively in the community including the Expediting, Marketing, Membership, Outreach, and Business Retention. The City has funded $10,000 per year since FY 1991 for on-going EDC operations. Recently, the EDC approached the City Council with a proposal to enhance the City's current economic development program including sixteen goals and related actionS. Many of these goals are being addressed by staff who will proceed with a coordinated effort with the EDC to accomplish them. Of particular importance, however, is the EDC request to hire a full-time EDC director. In order to properly address the request, staff has examined three alternatives: 1 ) Continue to direct the economic development program out of the City Manager's office with existing staff and continue to financially support the EDC at some level. Because the City Council sets the policy for the City and provides the-funding for the program, the City Manager has the responsibility for implementing the policy. To date, using this approach we have expansion/financial agreements with International Rectifier and Tension Envelope and are developing leads for two new relocations (500 jobs) and one expansion. Since the EDC made their proposal, the City of Murrieta has decided not to fund the $40,000 request needed for the EDC's full time position (see Attachment IV). Therefore, the City of Temecula may be asked to make up the shortfall or additional private donations will have to be found. This also raises the question of a "Temecula only" EDC because of the level of our funding. 2) A second alternative would be to hire an Economic Development Manager to work solely for the City. A budget for salaries and benefits would be approximately $55,000 per year. Given the tremendous volunteer effort, staff is concerned that a City position specifically dedicated to economic development may dampen the synergy now present among EDC volunteers for time and fundraising. Further, the outlook for funding such a position is not f~vorable given the need to staff and operate the new fire station. 3) The City may request proposals from marketing firms for an economic development program. However, this alternative can be more costly and may not create the best image for our City. In addition, staff has obtained information from other agencies that have also researched the issue and learned the following: The only EDCs with full time directors are County or large city EDCs, such as San Diego. Further, in a survey of Orange County cities (Attachment II), only eleven of thirty have full time Economic Development Managers, and are primarily cities large in population and have been incorporated for many years. Based on the foregoing considerations, staff recommends Alternative I for Council approval. This alternative provides the most clear line of authority for implementing Council policy and will be the most fiscally prudent without sacrificing results. R:INORTONL~AGENDA,~IEDP, AGN 3 7/29/94 Strategies If the City Council selects Alternative 1, the City Manager's Office will focus on the Economic Development Program and develop a workplan for council review and adoption. Following is an overview of the program. The implementation programs included in Attachment t can be divided into six major categories: · marketing campaign · business retention · regulatory process · incentives · tourism · training The marketing campaign will be developed by the City Manager's Office with input from all of the above groups. The scope of the campaign has been reduced to $40,000 for FY 1994- 95 compared to $250,000 in prior years. In addition, contacts made through this effort will receive follow up newsletters throughout the year. Business retention/outreach efforts are effectively carried out by the EDC and the Chamber through their outreach committees. The City Manager's office will support these activities in conjunction with the council appointment whenever a City representative is needed. The regulatory process is controlled by Federal, State and local governments. The City will continue to work with members of the EDC and MTG to streamline processing as much as possible. The City will also join these groups, as appropriate, to lobby for State and Federal legislative reform. Economic incentives provided by the City are important economic development tools when they are utilized in a fiscally prudent manner. Therefore, staff will develop and recommend certain minimum criteria for economic 8ssjstenc8. For exemple: The expansion or relocation must create at least 25 new jobs. The improvemen.ts must be worth at least $1 million and be long-term in nature. A fiscal impact analysis must result in tax proceeds to the City in excess of incentives provided. The tourism effort is currently handled primarily through the Chamber of Commerce, but is included in the City's marketing materials. Training incentives are regulated and funded by State and Federal programs. They are administered at the local level by the Private Industry Council (PIC), which is under the direction of the Director of the Riverside County EDA. PIC staff have been included in business meetings as appropriate. It is clear that Temecula's economy is on the rebound. Therefore, it is important that all roles are clarified so that businesses who make contact with the City or the above organizations receive concise and accurate information about Temecula. We hope this report and our discussion aide in this effort. R:IAtORTONLtAGENDA$1EDpoAGN 4 7/29/94 FISCAL IMPACT: The economic development program as outlined in Alternative I above is included in the FY 1994-95 budget of the City and Redevelopmerit Agency. Current staffing levels are adequate to carry out the plan. Attachment: Attachment I - General Plan of the Economic Development Element Attachment II - Economic Development Position Survey Attachment III - Economic Development Grants/Services Attachment IV - City of Murrieta Economic Development Budget R: WOR TONL tA GENOA SlEDI·. A ON 5 7/29/94 .:, Attachment I CITY OF TEME~ Economic Development Element I. INTRODUCTION A. Overview of the Economic Development Element The purpose of this Element is to provide ~uidance for economic development within T~mecula's jurisdiction to attain an economically viable community. In this sense, economically viable means a providing range of housing and employment opportunities that meet the needs of residents and workers alike, atwacting families and businesses to create demand for planned land uses, and establishing and funding public service leveis that preserve Temecula's quality of life. The Economic Development Element is linked primarily to the l_~.d Use and Housing Elements. Land use policy, in which the City takes an active role in defining development intensity, balance and mix of land uses and design guidelines, is fundamental to economic growth and fiscal well-being. Lnnd use policy also helps the City plan in advance for the secondary d:fects of development, including employment growth, infrastructure requirements and fiscal impacts. Temecula's housing policy is also linked to economic development planning in that economic relationships exist between housing types and employment opportunities, as well as between housing densities and the cost to maintain City service levels. With regard to attracting industry and maintaining mobility for corporate activities, the Circulation Element is also important to the economic development strategy. B. Authorization and Scope The Economic Development Element is an optional element of the General Plan, as set forth in the State Planning, Zoning and Development Laws, California Government Code §65303. Although the Economic Development Element is not a required element in the General Plan, the City has requested that one be prepared to consolidate and codify a gro.w~ng body of policy concerning the economic and fiscal viability of Temecula. Since this element is optional, it may be mended by the City Council to adapt to changing neals and economic conditions. C. Related Plans and Pro~'ams 1. Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation The Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation (EDC') is a privately funded program chartered to promote economic growth and development within Southwestern Riverside County. The EDC aims to accomplish its mission by improving business conditions and job growth in order to atU'act medium to large clean industry employers and to assist existing employers in the area. The EDC's goals for the subregion complement Temecula's specific economic development goals. Additionally, the EDC pwvides technical assistance with economic research and marketing programs that directly benefit the City. TFJ~'OlUlGP-,r~CDHV ° Dam: November 9, 1993 Page 11-1 CITY OF TE3AE~ Economic Development Element 2. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is currently providing four programs related to business development in the Tcmccula area: Tourism. The Chamber is curren~y in the process of pursuing a program for elementary school children from other counties to visit Temecula's historical district, wineries, horse ranches and museum as a field trip. The purpose is to educate kids and give them information to take home m their parents, opening the possibilities of relocating homes or businesses to the area. Local business vromotious. The "Shop Temecula First" program is a year-wund project encouraging citizens to shop locally. The pwgram is designed to educate consumers that the monies from local sales tax are used for local expenditures. Local merchants participate in the program by displaying logos and posters for ad campaigns. Education. The Chamber offers a business start-up kit to new and relocating businesses. The kits contain City guidelines for operating a business, tax information, City ordinances such as signage, and area information. Governmental. The Chamber has an active Civic and Developmental committee which tracks business related legislation and local issues. The Committee members attend the Planning Commission, Tra~c Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council meeting and make recommendations to the board for taking positions on business related issues. 3. City of Temecula Publicity Campaign Temeeula has recently launched a national publicity campaign to pwmote the advantages of locating in Temecula. The program included development of a promotional video and target industry list. This program currently implements several goals stated in this element, and should be further reviewed to ensure continuing efforts are in accordance with this element. 4. Old Town Specific Plan The Temecula Old Town Specific Plan is being prepared concurrcntly with the General Plan. The Old Town area pwvides an important r=tail environment within a historic setting, making it a key component of Temecula's tourism industry. Because of its importance to the local economy, the Old Town Specific Plan should be implemented in accordance with Temecula's stated economic development goals. TEM-0lUlGP-EC.DEV · Date: Nov6mber 9, 1993 Page 11-2 CITY OF TEME~ Economic Development Element II. SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES There is an interdependence among economic issues and the overall quality of llfe in Temecula. The high standards for community facilities and services attract businesses and residents. This attraction generates revenues which make high standards possible. Given its demonsmated atlxactiveness to industry and residents alike, opportunity exists for Temecula W further strengthen the local economy and maintain high service levels through effective economic development planning. A. Balanced Land Use As Temecula grows, there will be a need to maintain a level of housing supply which is affordable to workers in Temecula, given the dive~ified nature of the area's employment base. This is imporumt for two primary reasons. First, an improved jobs/housing balance will reduce long-distance commuting and enhance the quality of life for all Temecula residents. Second, a jobs/housing bahnee will increase the range of choice for residents and businesses,-making Temecula attractive to prospective residents and employers. B. Fiscal Viability Given the economic realities in California, each local jurisdiction must maintain its own fiscal viability. This will require a combination of hnd use policy, attraction of business, and local revenue policy, including taxation. It must be also recognized that long-term fiscal viability requires incremental public and private investment, including development impact fees. C. Economic Expansion The economy in Temecula has expanded very rapidly over the 1983 .to 1989 period. However, there has been concern in the community that ~u~h since 1989 may be flagging. As Tcmecula's economic base once again expands, this expansion can provide a greater range of job opportunities and can help the City meet its fiscal goals. However, rapid expansion can also lead to undesirable impacts on tra~c and other infxastrncture capacity. D. Employment Growth Temecula's job base grew very rapidly during the 1980s. The number of jobs in Temecula increased from about 4,000 in 1983 to over 15,000 by 1992. This growth represents an annual growth rate of about 18 poment, significantly higher than growth in both the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Area and Southwest Riverside County. Based on economic trends and projections for the Southern California region, the number of jobs in the Temeeula area is projected to increase by between 30,000 and 53,000 by 2010. TFnM-0IUlGP-EC.D~.' · Da~,,: November 9, 199~ Pap 11-3 CITY OF TEMECLTLA Economic Development Element IlL GOALS AND POLICIES Goal 1 Discussion Policy Development of a strong base of dean manufacturing activities which employs a skilled labor force and e~n be successfully integrated into Temecula's cOmmlll!Ry character. Temccula has maintained high standards for manufacturing activity which have enhanced its attractiveness to both employers and residents. With additional land reserved for manufacturing activities, the City must continue to guide the location, design, and function of industry throughout its development cycle. 1.1 Policy 12 Policy 13 Policy 1.4 Attract and retain industry that complements Temecula's character and takes advantage of Temccula's locational advantage for goods movement and corporate mobility. Encourage the growth and expansion of existing industry by providing high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance. Maintain a local regulatory environment that is favorable to clean industry. Provide technical assistance m industries that will be affected by new regional air quality regulations and other developing regional regulations. Goal 2 Diversification of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing, retail and service activities. Discussion Policy The economy in Temecula has been expanding very rapidly, providing job opportunities and generating fiscally positive development patterns. The Temecula economy has shown rccem diversification in both manufacturing and services. Since Temecula has not yet completed its real estate development cycle, the economic base can be expected to divemify further, with an increased level of professional services and a more mature retail base. Areas where additional diversification is needed may include: the financial sector, medical and health services, retail (,particularly in general merchandise and apparel), lodging, recreation and other visitor-oriented services. Policy 22 Provide for industrial land uses which facilitate a variety of user types, including manufacturing space, storage and distribution, back-office space, and research and development space. Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions. T54-0XUlGV-EC.DEV · Date: Novcmb~ 9, 1993 Pap 11-5 CITY OF TEMECULA Economic Development Element Policy 2.3 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.5 Promote development of properly located and well designed commercial centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City. Promou~ retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high-quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. Use redevelopm~nt powets and opportunities to enhance development opporttmifics. Goal 3 Maintain an economic base to provide a sound ftscal foundation for the City as well as quality community facilities and high service levels. Discussion Prior to incorporation, the Temecula area experienced rapid growth under the jurisdiction of Rivetside County. With incorporation and the ability to capture more local revenues, the City is now able to conduct fiscal planning in the context of economic development. With economic development planning, Tcmecula has an even greater opportunity to influence its fiscal base, resulting in a fiscal balance across land uses. Policy 3.1 Policy 3.2 Policy 33 Policy 3.4 Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts. Encourage the growth or relocation of industries that generate local tax and employment advantages. Evaluate fiscal impacts of new development on an ongoing basis and provide appropriate mitigation strategies. Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as a retailing center along the Interstate 15 corridor. TEM-OI~I, IOP-I~t"-n~'V · D8~; Novernb~' 9, 1993 Page 11-6 CITY OF TEMECtL~ Economic Development Element Goal 4 Discussion Establishment of a diverse education and training and job placement system which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in Temec,,in~ Residents and employers have identified education as a key clement in developing the long-range economic base in Temecula. By providing superior educational opportunities and resources, with an emphasis on practical educational programs for the job mix required to serve the COmmtlnity, many residents will prc£er to work within the City. A full range of adult education, retraimng, special education, vocational/technical education and college/univex~ity level facilities and curriculum.~ should be provided, aimed at responding to the educational needs of the community through each phase of development. Policy 4.1 Policy 4.2 Policy 43 Support economic development goals through a range of education and training activities. Establish a proactive, periodic dialogue early in the pining process between the City and educational institutions, including school districts and community coiled:s, on issues related to the phasing of development, service standards and demands. Explore the potential for a comprehensive extension center through UC Rivehide and/or the California State University system. Goal 5 Discussion Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecula, including cost advantages, amenities, housing, community activities and civic services. Tcmecula currently has a number of favorable employment growth conditions - including demonstrated attractiveness to industry and an ideal locafional advantag~ for company headquarters. The City wishes to focus future efforts on continuing to attract high quality clean industry. However, with the current rcgulatory environment and rising land prices, the City may need to clearly define incentives for businesses to locate in Tcmecula instead of other communities. Policy 5.1 Policy 5.2 Policy 5..3 Policy 5.4 Develop and maintain a marketing program to publicize the virtues of relocating to Tcmecula. Monitor the economic conditions in Tcmccula in comparison to other locations in California and throughout the nation to determine relative advantages. Monitor the supply of homing in relation to the supply of jobs in ter~s of to balance area-wide jobs, households, worker earnings and housing expenses. Monitor existing businesses in Tcmccula and identify the elements of a business retention program. T~4-OI'aXOP-EC, DEV · Date: November 9, 1993 Psg~ 11-7 CITY OF T'EIVIECIJJ. A Economic Development Element Goal 6 Discussion Policy Policy Develop Temeculaas a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination, with a range of attractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence. Because of its wine country location and historical significance, Temecula has become a limited tourist destination point. For tourism to play an effective role in the local economy, however, the industry must expand beyond Old Town and seasonal attractions and provide for year-round activities capable of generating greater tourist interest. Community leaders have expressed the desire to expand Temecula's tourism industry in a manner that complements established residential areas as well as businesses. Policy 63 Policy 6.4 Encourage and enhance cooperative efforts with the wine-making industry in the Temecula Valley to pwmote Teme~ula as a destination resort. Identify commercial recreation, convention and resort activities - including golf-oriented resorts - that can take advantage of Temecula's character and climate, while complementing wine-making activities. Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tottrism and to improve its attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality. Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performing am, museums. TEM-01~IIOP-EC.D~V · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-8 CITY OF TEMECULA Economic Development Element IV. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS A. Attracting Clean Manufacturing Activities 1. Gumtee project processing within a defined time-frame for prospective employers. 2. Provide planning and design direction to preserve and develop the physical environment for business in Temecuia, including infrastructure,. circulation and other community amenities. 3. Provide technical assist, nee to business in rolocation, business development and for regional marketing and promotional services. 4. Develop and maintain a list of targeted industxias that can take advantage of the unique loea~onal advantages of Temecuia. 5. Develop and maintain a data base of labor pool characteristics to be used in the promotion of Temecula to prospective industry. 6. Evaluate the relative value of industrial land in Temecuia in relation to other communities on an ongoing basis in conjunction with local brokers. 7. Prepare representative pro forma analyses comparing Temecula with competing Southern C. alfforoia locatious. 8. Prepare informational, promotional and advertising materials aimed at attracting elite corporate aetivitias. 9. Provide assistance to prospective employers in site selection, development applications and coordination with regional, state and federal regulatory agencies. 10. Promote Temecuia's advantages to employers at industrial and office park trade shows and conferences. B. Manufacturing, Services and Retail Diversification 1. Allocate land uses to pwvide for a range of industrial development types, emphasizing build-to-suit space where possible. 2. Conduct a retail market analysis to understand retail demand and precisely identify leakage of local purchasing power from Temecula. 3. Recruit national retailers in categories not currently pwvided in Temecuia and encourage development of additional general merchandise and apparel retailing in the City. 4. Designate sites for additional health cam services within the community. 6. Define retail niches that support toufism and satisfy the .nrnet demand for upscale retail goods. 7. Promote Temecula's retail advantages at retailing and shopping center conferences and trade shows. TEM4)I~IIGP-EC, DEV · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-9 CITY OF TEME~ Economic Development Element C. Fiscal Vi. ability 1. Require new development to pay for its share of capital and operating costs not met by General Fund revenues generated directly by the project. 2. Utilize the comprehensive fiscal impact model on an ongoing basis to monitor both C-~neral Fund and Community Service District Fund fiscal impacts as development information becomes available. 3. Formulate land use mitigation strategies for projected deficits to incorporate a balance of land uses that will provide sufficient revenue to cover new costs. 4. Define financing techniques that will assist in funding recurring costs in addition to funding one-time capital improvements, allocating the impacts equitably between new and existing development. 5. Evaluate fiscal impacts of future annexations on an ongoing basis. 6. Carefully evaluate long-term effects of proposed City sales tax rebates to large retailers. D. Education and Job Training 1. Explore long-range potential for locating a campus of the California State University system within the Ternecula vicinity. 2. Designate a site for a community college in Temecula. 3. Establish an education and training consortium between the City, the school districts and local employers. 4. Prepare information on advantages of Temecula Unified School District and Mt. San Jacinto Community College District E. Attracting Business 1. Work with the TemeculafMurrieta Economic Development Coi'poration to promote the advantages of Temecula. 2. Continue 'to res~ardh market and demographic conditions to identify Temecula's relative strengths and we~k-neases to firms wishing to relocate. 3. Monitor existing and projected jobs/housing relationships to provide for housing supply in balance with the labor requirements of local industry. 4. Develop commercial-oriented lodging on west side of Interstate 15. 5. Develop program to interview businesses that leave Temecula to better understand corporate location policy. 6. Determine the impact expansion of the French Valley Airport would have on businesses deciding to locate in Temecula. 7. Work with local businesses to articulate and implement a business retention Tm,4.0IUXOP-~C..DEV · Date: Nov~nber 9, 1993 Page 11-10 C'~TY OF TEh/~ Economic Development Element F. Developing Tourism 1. Determine threshold l~vels of golf, equestrian and related activities to provide a viable resort environment 2. Coordinate an annual program of events with local attractions, including Old Town, golf, wineries, ballooning and future p)a-ned atlractions. 3. E-xplow !inlrages between Tcroecula attractions and other attractions in southwest Riverside County. 4. Emphasize historic attributes of the area, including the Anzs Expedition, the roission era, Butterfield Stage, the Vail Ranch and the roore rec~nt fanning-based econoroy. 5. Identify the type and location of recreational activities - including goff - that would coropleroant the existing tourisro related to the wineries and Old Town. 6. Identify scope and possible location of a performing arts facility. 7. Begin considerations for attraaing a minor league baseball team to Teroecula. 8. l)~v~loproent long-term plan to accommodate resort lodging facilities r~lated to golf, recreation and other tourist-oriented activities. 9. Prepare a Specific Plan for Old Town, including any transition or expansion areas, to preserve and enhance the econoroic vitality, viability and roarketing, and to enhance to the role of Old Town in local tourisro. 10. Incorporate Old Town Temecula into the regional roarketing strategy for Teroecula Valley. 11. Develop a consistent roarketing theroe for the Old Town area to expand its image as a tourist destination point. 12. Consider the use of a roain street type program to impwve the atlractiveness and econoroic vitality of Old Town. 13. Encourage the creation of a community organization coroposed of representatives of old town businesses and community organizations, and the City of Teroecula to oversee the Main Street Program for Old Town Teroecula. 14. Participate in cooperative efforts to roaintain Old Town Teroecula as an iroponant local econoroic and COmmunity asseL liM-01UlOP-EC.DHV · Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-11 CITY An~hcLl~ Buena Park Garden Grove Huntington Beach La Habra La Palm Lamina Beach Lamina Hills Laauna Niwael Lake Forest Los AJnmltos M~ssion Vieio Newocrt Beach Omze Placenun San Cletaenm San Juan Canistrano Santa Aria Stanton Tu_etm Villa Park We,~mmqer Yoma Linda Attachment II ECONOMIC DEVELOP~fENT POSITION? Re. development/Economic Developtaent M~nngcr. Reports to Exec. DLr. Of Comm Dev. No Dosit. ion Redevelopment/Economic Developtaent M2ma~,er reports to Dir. of Comm. Dev. No position No Position Economic D~eloDtaent Coordinator $4166-5056 tao, Position not filled. No work plato Provides directive assistance to Plam'u.ug & Re. development $44,000-55,000/yr. Commumty Dev./Economic Dev.; Manager reports to Cornre. Dir. of Cornre. Dev. $4,417/tao.-$5.388/mo Business Developtaent Project Manager $490545077mo Reports to City Mg.; processes loans; provides direcTave assistance to the Door. of Redevelo~menL No oosition. No ~sition. No ~osition. No ~osifion. No ~osi~on. Economic Developtaent Analyst. Provides Code Enforcement and sign Economic Develot~ment Comtmssion. (unoaid~ Deoun, City Administrator. Economic Development Depart. merit M~n~eer: S5.040/mo. St,463/mo. No position. Yes. $4,550/mo.-SS,_'~31/tao. IneenUve program. Bonus up to $&105/mo. Commumtv Develo~taent M~n~ ~.er. StaffoflT. M~n~eer. $6,140/mo.-SS.674/mo. No ~sitiom No l~sition. Under the Deot_ of R~eveloDment I responsibilities under the Redevelopment Deparument No position. City of Temecula A'R'ACHMENT Economic Development Grants/Services Description 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Corp, Temecula Valley Film Counoil Final Touch Marketidg Total $ 22,500,00 $ 45,000.00 $ 46,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 158,500.00 17,500.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,575.00 48,075.00 ·11,071.04 8,552.07 19,623.11 202,432,54 184 ,NI7,25 101,982.00 489,261.79 $ 40,000.00 $ 257,432.54 $ 251,918.29 $ 166,109.07 $ 715,459.90 Attachment City of Murrieta Economic Development Budget EDC contribution for 1994/95 Economic Development Budget for 1994/95 Work Program/Plan Public Relations - State of Region Conference Training Memberships & Publications Meetings Office Supplies Contract/Chamber of Commerce Marketing ,300 $ 71,840 10,000 4,600 2,800 2,650 400 35,000 15,090 71,840 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD JULY 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:29 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Jeff Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts 1 DIRECTORS: Stone Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Roberrs, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1 and 2. The motion was unanimously carried with President Stone absent. 1. MinUteS 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 12, 1994. 2. Award of Construction Contract for Kent HinterQardt Memorial Park Proiect No. PW94- 01CSD 2.1 Award a contract for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, Project PW94-O 1CSD, to Malek General Contractor, for t/98,600.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract and; 2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 99,860.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT None given. Minut~$.CSD\012694 -1- 1/19/~. Tenqeculs ComrnuniW Services District Minutes July 26.1994 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson announced the City would host a California Parks and Recreation General Membership Meeting Workshop on Tuesday, August 2, 1994, at the Community Recreation Center. DIRECTORS REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberrs to adjourn at 8:31 PM to a meeting on August 9, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with President Stone absent. Jeff Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\Board Secretary Minut~,.CSD\072694 -2- 7/19/94 ITEM 2 FINANCE OFFICER~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager August 9, 1994 Amendment to the Construction Contract with Martin J. Jaska for the Construction of Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-03CSD PREPARED BY: hawn D Nelson Director of Community Services on Spa;nolo Pr~nc pal Engineer Cap tal Proj cts RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve Amendment No. 1, revising the Construction Contract with Martin J. Jaska for the Construction of Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, by reducing the scope of work and the cost associated with completing this work to an amount not to exceed $1,714,500.00. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of ~ 171,450.00,which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. DISCUSSION: In the fall of last year the Board of Directors awarded a construction contract for the construction of Pala Community Park to Martin J. Jaska, Inc. High ground water, a result of the above average rainfall in 1992, reduced the bearing capacity of the soil. Due to the inability of the soil to support construction equipment, work on the project has been suspended since the latter part of January, 1994. A contract change order has since been authorized for the contractor to investigate the feasibility of dewatering the site for construction purposes. Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers (GEE) monitered the investigation and it is GEE's professional opinion that the site can be sufficiently dewatered to resume construction of the park site. However, due to the unknown variables associated with dewatering operations, it was recommended to proceed with the project by phasing the park construction. pw13~agdrpt\94~0809\jaskaarnd.nol The project plans and specifications were then revised by the landscape architect to reflect a reduction in the scope of work for the first phase of construction. The reduced scope of work will enable the City to construct a large variety of recreational facilities and significantly reduce the amount of grading required within the high ground water areas. The first phase of construction consists of the following improvements located in the eastern portion of the site: grading, landscaping and irrigation, sewer, water and electrical, tennis, basketball and volleyball courts, full size soccer field, picnic shelters and amenities, concession stand and restroom facility, and a parking lot and street improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost for Amendment No. 1 is $1,885,950.00which includes tlie revised contract amount of $1,714,500.00 and the 10% contingency amount of $171,450.00. This project will be funded through Development Impact Fees. Sufficient funds exist in the Capital Projects Account for this project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract Amendment No. 1 pw13~agdrpt~94~0809~jaskaarnd.nol AMENDMENT NO. 1 MARTIN J. JASKA, INC. PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13849 The Agreement dated October 26, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and Martin J. Jaska, Inc. (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Construction Contract for Pala Community Park RE: Construction Services Pala Community Park Section 1 The scope of work as listed in Section No. 2 of the *Agreement" shall be amended to add Item No. lla - Dewatering to the Schedule of Prices - Base Bid as shown on the attached exhibit "A" and to delete Alternative Bid Items No. 1 through No. 4 as listed in the Schedule of Prices - Alternate Bid. The contract amount as described in Section No. 4 of the "Agreement" shall be deleted and replaced by the compensation for services as described in this amendment. The contract time as described in Section No. 4 will remain the same. Section 2 Compensation for services shall be a total of all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed One Million, Seven Hundred and Fourteen Thousand and Five Hundred Dollars ($1,714,500.00), the total amount of the base bid. Proposed Amendment No. 1 $ 1.714.500.00 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. pwl 3\agdrpt%94~O809Xjaskaamcl,nol EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PALA COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT NO, PW93-O3CSD ITEM NO, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SCHEDULE OF PRICES - BASE BID DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED QUANTITY Oneits and Of fails Utilities Drainage Facilities Grading Asphalt Paving and Concrete Recreational Facilities Site Amenatlas Building I Playground Facilities Landscaping Irrigation Bsctricel Site Lightring (klc, Buildings) ~ ~, TOTAL AMOUNT OF BASE BID: ($ UNIT TOTAL AMOUNT LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS L$ LS I.S DOLLARS AND CENTS pw13\agdrpt%94\0809~jaskaemd.no1 ITEM 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: August 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Contract Change Order No. 2 Sports Park Slope Repair Project No. PW93-06.CSD PREPARED BY: ~DDhawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects ennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for the Sports Park Slope Repair, Project No. PW93-06.CSD, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of $77,977.00. 2. Transfer $72,482.54 from TCSD Fund Balance and appropriate this amount to the Capital Improvement Fund. BACKGROUND: During the construction Of the Sports Park Slope Repair Project the following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract: CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 1. Concrete Cam Two water mains feeding San Diego County lie within a 145 feet wide Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement which cuts through the project. Due to the fragile condition of one of the pipes, the City was required by MWD to construct a protective reinforced concrete cap over approximately 160 linear feet of San Diego Pipeline No. 2 prior to beginning work within the easement. SUBTOTAL: $ 52,735.00 pw13%agdrpt~94%OBO9~Dw93-06 072694 Unarouted Rio-Rao: In order to reduce the potential of exposing MWD's water lines, MWD required that the City reduce the velocity of flow across their easement. This design change increased the depth of flow in the channel which corresponded to an increased depth of flow within the desilting basin. The City elected to extend the ungrouted rip-rap within the basin to the top of the channel to protect the channel banks against the increased depth. SUBTOTAL: $9,060.00 Groul;ed Rio-Rap: The construction quantities for the grouted rip-rap within the desilting basin exceeded the engineer's estimate listed in the bid schedule. SUBTOTAL: $16,182.00 TOTAL:S77,977.00 FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract was awarded in the amount of $223,445.00. Contract Change Order No.1 was approved for a total amount of $16,850.04. The remaining contingency amount is $5,494.46. Contract Change Order No. 2 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed $77,977.00. The total adjusted contract amount for the project is $318,272.04. An amount of $72,482.54 must be transferred from TCSD Fund Balance and appropriated to the Capital Improvement Fund to cover the balance of Change Order No. 2. The original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City totals $27,626.68 (DSR #'s 65754 and 91879). The City is eligible for a reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the costs associated with the repair of the channel and reconstruction of slope for a total of $25,900.00. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract Change Order No. 2 pw13\agdrpt~94~0809\pw93-06 072694 · of Temecula Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694~191~9 FAX (909) 694q999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 CONTRACT NO. PW93-06CSD PROJECT: SDorts Park Slope Repair SHEET I of 2 TO CONTRACTOR: American Contractina, Inc. NOTE: This chanQe order is not effective until aDoroved by the EnQineer. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following items: Concrete Cao: Two water mains feeding the community of San Diego lie within a 145 feet wide Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement which cuts through the project. Due to the fragile condition of one of the pipes, the City was required by MWD to construct a protective reinforced concrete cap over approximately 160 linear feet of San Diego Pipeline No. 2 prior to beginning work within the easement. SUBTOTAL:S52,735.00 Unarouted Rio-Rao: In order to reduce the potential of exposing MWD's water lines, MWD required that the City reduce the velocity of flow across their easement. This design change increased the depth of flow in the channel which corresponded to an increased depth of flow within the desilting basin. The City elected to extend the ungrouted rip-rap within the basin to the top of the channel to protect the channel banks against the increased depth. SUBTOTAL: $9,060.00 Grouted RiD-Rap: The construction quantities for the grouted rip-rap within the desilting basin exceeded the engineer's estimate listed in the bid schedule. SUBTOTAL: $16,182.00 TOTAL:S77,977.00 pw13~agdrp~94~O8Og~pw93-06 072694 ~Pnnted on Recycled P~per CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 ' CONTRACT NO. PW93-06CSD SHEET 2 of 2 Original Contract AmOunt Adjusted Contract Amount Change Order No. 02 Total Adjusted Contract Amount $223,445.00 $240,295.04 $77,977.00 $319,272.04 Adjustment of Working Days Approved: Principal Engr. 15 We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Contractor: (o pany s name) C m ' Title: If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. pw13\agdrpt~94\O809~pw93-06 072694 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATfORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager August 9, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair PW94-06CSD PREPARED BY: Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, PW94-06CSD, to Trautwein Construction for $31,000.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of. $3,100.00, which is eclual to 10% of the contract amount. Transfer $15,397.00from TCSD Fund Balance in Service Level C and appropriate this amount to the Capital Improvement Fund. BACKGROUND: During the storms of January 1993, the Long Valley Wash Channel suffered damage to the reach located adjacent to the southerly side of Rancho California Road between Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Tajol (see attached site map). The damage was surveyed by representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and subsequently declared eligible for disaster relief funding. The City is eligible for a reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the costs identified in the Damage Survey Reports (DSR's) for this project or $18,703. The damage occurred within two separate reaches of the channel. The first extends from Calle Tajol to Meadows Parkway and the second extends from Vintage Hills Drive to Butterfield Stage Road. The damage consists of the deposition and accumulation of sediment within portions of the flowline and several desilting basins, the erosion of portions of the channel's -1- r:%~d~t~94\OBOg~pw94-06 .swd banks adjacent to and below Rancho California Road and a residential housing tract, and the erosion and undermining of portions of the channel flowline and rip-rap drop structures. The bids were publicly opened on July 14, 1994 and the results are as follows: 1. Sean Malek Engineering & Construction 2. Trautei.n Construction 3. One Tractor Doze It All 4. Vista Mirrieta Corporation 5. Kunze, Inc. 6. Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc. BASE BID $ 24,900 '$ 31,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,174 $ 69,300 $102,410 Based on the funding available for the project, it is recommended that only the work associated with the base bid be approved at this time. The work described in the base bid is required to prevent future erosion of the channel and its banks. Sean Malek Engineering and Construction was the apparent low bidder, but upon further review of the bid package it was discovered that the bid bond was incorrect, which invalidates the bid. Trautwein Construction is the next lowest bidder for the base bid. Trautwein Construction has performed work similar in scope to the Long Valley Wash project for other agencies within Southern California. Based on comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by Trautwein Construction has been acceptable. The construction schedule is for 30 working days. Work is expected to begin in early September, 1994 and be completed by the middle of October, 1994. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The total project amount is $34,100.O0which includes the contract amount of $31,000.00 plus the 10% contingency of $3,100.00. The City is eligible for a reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the costs associated with the repair of the channel for a total of $18,703.00.Anamount of $15,397.00,the balance of the funding required to match the total project amount, must be transfered from TCSD Fund Balance and appropriated to the Capital Improvement Fund. ATTACHMENT: 1. Site Map 2. Construction Contract -2- r:~m~drpt\g4~OSOg~pwg4-O6.mwd TO. COW, C~4A ;, NnA . n specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all .utility and transportation services required ~or the following: PROJECT NO. PW94.-06CSD LONG VALLEY WASH - CHANNEL REPAIRS All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: THIRTY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS ($31,000.O0),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed thirff (30) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. Pursuant to Section 20104.50of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. -4- r:\~gdzpt\94~)80¢)~,/94-06 ..wd m 11. 12. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. De Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance witli Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of ~25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR -5- r:~agdt~t~94~OSO9~pw94=06 .awd 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Tim D. Serlet, Director of ,Public Works/City Engineer ................................. City of Temecula .......................... 43174 Business Park Drive .......................... Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: ATTEST: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron RobeKs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk -7- r:\~gdrpt~94~OSO9~w94-O6.awd LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND LIVer1 ITEM 5 FINANCE OFFICE~ CITY MANAGER \ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager August 9, 1994 Acceptance of the Community Recreation Center - Phase II Project No. PW92-29B PREPARED BY: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services on Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board accept the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-029B, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: 1. File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one- year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount), 2. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed to that date. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1992, the Board of Directors awarded a construction contract to T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. for the construction of the Community Recreation Center - Phase II (Project No. PW92-029B), in the amount of $/4,196,400. The contract included the construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. recreation center, an amphitheater and multipurpose room with sound and lighting systems, a community pool with a water slide, and parking improvements. The contractor has substantially completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. pw13\agdrpt~94~0809~pw92-O29B 0615 A warranty retention in the amount of 1% of the project retention will be retained for a period of one (1) year from the project completion. The work was completed on or about March 25, 1994, but because the contractor delayed in submitting the final documents to close-out the contract, the release of the construction retention was deferred until this time. Consequently, the 1% warranty retention should be released after March 25, 1995. Any item of work which is being disputed or has yet to be fully completed will be deducted from the retention until completely resolved by the City and the contractor. FISCAL IMPACT: , The original contract was awarded in the amount of ~4,196,400.00. An additional amount of $110,000.00 was approved for the contingency. The final adjusted contract amount includes Contract Change Orders No.1 through No. 14, which were approved for a total amount of $205,484.17 or 4.9% of the original contract amount. The final adjusted contract amount for the project is $4,401,884.17. ATTACHMENTS 1> 2> 3) Notice Of Completion Contractor's Affidavit Maintenance Bond pw13\agdrpt\94%0809%pw92-029B 0615 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Perk Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LiNE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to: T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC. to perform the following work of improvement: COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - PHASE II. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on August 9, 1994. That upon said contract the INSURANCE CO. OF THE WEST was surety for the bond given by said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: TEMECULA SPORTS PARK. 6. The street address of said property is: 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of · 1993. STATE OF CALIFORNIA . ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of .1993. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk FomxdCIP-O01 Rev. 12,-$-91 pw13~cip~projecm%pwg2-29b%comp/etn.not 061694 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WOPdfS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. ~0Z~ This is tO certify that'E~.F~CZ--~SO~g#~N~.l(hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. ~-O~ ~ situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: INSERT TITLE OF WOP_K HERE The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection ~ith the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount of Dispute 5,~, ~, .oo ~Ho,a~s.oo Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release-and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any co act ~ount whic '" the Contractor has not disputed ~y~..ove. S~ ~ Dated: 0u~ I~I [~ -"~"' ~_~- ,~__~ Print Name and Title BOlfD NO. 123 73 23a CITY OF TEMECULA, COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO. 92-0298 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: T. B. PENICK & SONS, INC., P. 0. BOX 620428, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92162 NAME AND ADDRES,$ OF CONTRACTOR S CORPORATION (fill in whether e Corporation, Partnership or individual) · hereins(tar called Principal, and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, 5725 KEARNY VILLA ED,, SUITE R, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURE7Y hereins(tar called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereins(tar called OWNER, in the penal sum of FOUR HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY EIGHT ................ DOLLARS Ind FORTY-TWO ..... ~ {$ 440,188.42 ...... ) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well end truly to be made, we bind ourselves· successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the .BTB d~y of DECEMBER ,1992 , e copy of which is hereto attached end made e part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. 92-029B. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS; the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on MAY 5 19 94. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. ENTF F.r. ,)UH f B 199 M~NTINANG! 1(2ND M-1 Signed and sealed this 15TH day of J~1E ,19 94 (Seal) SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE IqEST JAMZS F. TEGHTMEYER (Name) ATTORNEY IN FACT (Title) PRINCIPAL T. B. PE~S;% '~2' By: ('~,/fU, , T~0MAS L. im~Trm, (Name) (Title) By: (Name) (Title) MAIIlINANCl BOND M-2 ;ALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE AGKNOWLIDGMENT CALIFORNIA On 06/15/94 before ms. SANDF. A J. LXTTLE, NOTARY PUBLIC /DerIonally a]D;eare(: JAMES F. TEGHTMEYER, ATTORNEY IN FACT ~ ~ polonatty k~own to me - OR · ~ prOvl~ to me ~n the ~ali8 of sa~lfa~o~ evidence THIS CERTI;ICATE MUST SE AI'TACHED TO THE DOCUMENT OESCRIBED AT RIGH'(, to De the perSon(S) whose name(s) is/are suDscrilUSd m the within inltrument lnc~ l¢. knowledgecl to me this he/she/they executed the lime in hiS/her/their luthorszecl caplc|ty(ias), and thlt by hiS/her/their signmurNI) on the instrument the parion(s), or the entity upon bahelf of which the person(s) a~tecL executed me instrument. .m~m OPTIONAL SECTION m CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] iNDIVIDUAL I~ CORPORATE DF;~CERCSt [] PARTNER(S) E~ L.SUiTED GENERAl. ~1 A'/'FORNEY-IN-ItACT [] TRUS1/E(SI [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR r'l OTHER: SIGNER I$ REPRESENTING: OPTIONAL SECTION Tr~ OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMIER OF PAGES DATE DIe DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE etll'J N&T~ONA&, NOTARY AS$CGIA'PON · IZ3l Reedmet Ave,, INSURANCE COMPAI'If OF THE HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Certified Copy of W ST POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, a Corporation duly authorized and existing under the leas of the State of California and having its principal office in the City of San Diego, California, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint: James F. Teghtmeyer its true and lovrFul Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full peaer and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledqe and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations xn the nature thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under end by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST at a meeting duly coiled and held on the Sixth day of February, 1973, which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the following is a true, full, and complete copy: Secretary, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time remove such Attorneys-in-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney,given him or herl and be it further RESOLVED: That the Attorney-in-Fact may be given fuZZ power to execute for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company any and o11 bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or undertakings executed by any such Attorney- in-Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Secretary." ZN WITNESS WHEREOF, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST has caused its official seal to be here- unto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers this 20th day of July, 1990 ~~r'eSident E STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On this 20 day of July, 1990 before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of California, in and for the County of San Diego, duly commissioned and qualified, came BERNARD M. FELDMAN, President of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, to me personally known to be the individual and officer described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of the said Corporation, and that the said Corporate Seal end his signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of San Diego, the day and year first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I, the undersigned, JAMES W, AUSTIN, ZZI, Secretary of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregoing is o full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect, and has not been revoked, IN WITNESS Corporate SeaZ of the Corporation, this 15TH WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name as Secretary, end JUNE 19 94 '. day of lOW CAL 37(REV. 5/87) Secretary affixed th~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD JULY 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:31 PM. PRESENT: 4 ABS.ENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Mu~oz, Roberrs, Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel .Peter Thorson and Agency Secretary June S. Greek~ PUBLIC COMMENTS Theresa McLeod, 42200 Main St., F128, voiced her objections to proceeding with the Buffman proposal until a vote of the general public is taken. AGENCY BUSINESS 1. Minutes It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 12, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Extension of Consultina Services Aareement with PMW Associates Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report. Agency Member' Muf~oz asked if the contract contained a cancellation clause. Mr. Bradley responded there is a 30 day termination clause. It was moved by Agency Member Mu~oz, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation, with direction to staff to return to Council for re- evaluation in six (6 months). 2.1 Authorize the extension of the consulting services agreement with PMW Associates for the implementation of redevelopment and housing programs. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent. Temecula RedeveloDment A~ency Minutes July 26, 199a EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley reported work is moving forward on the Old Town Entertainment Project and a report will be forthcoming, GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS Agency Member Parks requested that workshops be scheduled in conjunction with the Entertainment Center proposal. Agency Member Mufioz requested that extra advertising be done when the feasibility study is presented. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Robarts to adjourn at 8:45 PM to a meeting on August 9, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer August 9, 1994 Chamber of Commerce Agreement PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members approve the FY 1994-95 agreement with the Chamber of Commerce to provide services and authorize the Executive Director to execute the contract. BACKGROUND: Attached you will find the annual activity report from the Chamber of Commerce for your review. The current year RDA budget includes $45,000 to fund the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber has a City promotional budget of $103,000 and is requesting funding for only a portion of that budget. In addition to servicing its members, the chamber uses a portion of its promotional budget in support of activities that will directly benefit the majority of the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area. The following is a list of promotional services provided by the Chamber: "Shop Temecula First Ad" Campaign Visitor's Guide School Field T~ip Program Welcome Packages In the past three (3) years, the Chamber has been able to accomplish many of these promotional services with the City's support. These services and activities would be greatly decreased or eliminated without the City's support. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount is budgeted in account 280-199-999-5270. Attachment: Annual Activity Report and Description of Services Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Agreement SERVICES CiTy PROMOTION 3g-3e/. PROVIDED T~) CI="i $1Q3,100 /" ,/~'~,~TOURI~M 17.2%1 TOURISM VISITOR'S GUIDE SCHOOL HISTORICAL TOURS WELCOME PACKAGES VISITORS CENTER TRADE SHOWS CITY PROMOTION SHOP TEMECULA FIRST BUSINESS SHOWCASE INFORMATION RELOCATION PACKAGES DEMOGRAPHIC INFOPav~ATION CALENDAR OF EVENTS MAPS PICTORIAL RESIDENTIAL GUIDE ASSISTANCE/WALK-IN/PHONE BUSINESS PACKAGE EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS YOUTH COMMISSION CAREER PATH SPECIAL EVENTS ARTS FESTIVAL OCTOBERFEST CHRISTMAS PARADE TOTAL DOLLARS DOLLARS 17,500 5,000 5,000 1,500 3,000 3,000 40,000 30,000 10,000 35,800 4,000 5,300 2,000 5,000 1,500 3,000 12,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 PERCENT 16.973 38.797 34,723 4.849 2,909 SERVICES PROVIDED BY '~'~E TEM~Cu~A VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MINIM13M MAN-HOUR CALuu~ATION MEETING MAN VOLUNTEERS MONTIILY FRE0u~NCY HOURS INVOLV~u HOURS Chamber Board of Directors Executive Officers Full Board 1/month 2.0hrs. x 5mem 10hrs. 1/month ~.0hrs. xl5mem 30hrs. Tourismco~{ttee Full Committee Welcome Packag Ad Campaign School Fieldtrip Visitor's Guide 1/month 2.0hrs. x20mem 40hrs. 2/month 1.0hrs. x 3mem 6hrs. 2/month 2.0hrs. x 5mem 20hrs. 1/month 2.0hrs. x 2mem 4hrs. Local Busiuess Promotion Full Committee Business Showcase 3/month 1.5hrs. x 7mem 31,5hrs. I/month 1.5hrs. x 5mem 7,5hrs. 'Information Office Volunteers 20/month 4.0hrs. x 3mem 240hrs. Governmental Affairs Committee Full Committee 1/month Education Sub-Com 1/month Healthcare Sub-Com 2/month 1.5hrs. xl5mem 23hrs. 1.0hrs. x 4mem 4hrs. 1.5hrs. x 7mem 21hrs. Special Events ArTs Festival Parades 2/month 2.Shrs. x lmem 10hrs. 2/month 4.0hrs. x lmem 8hrs. TOTAL HOURS 455brs. ANNUALIZED COST volunteer time 455/hrs./mo.@$10/hr. = $4,550.00 = $ 54,~00/yr Staff Time Costs 325hrs./mo.@$10.00/hr.=$3,255.00 = $ 39,060/yr Estimated Postage costs not including operations = $ 2,700/yr Estimated Copy costs not including operations = $ 5,600/yr Estimated Phone costs not including operations = $ 2,100/yr TOTAL COST 8103,100/YR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TEMEuu~A VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATION * ScholarshiDe: The Chamber's Governmental Affairs Committee was able to raise $2,000 through City and business donations and by recycling aluminum cans from monthly mixers and special events to set aside for scholarships. The committee set a criteria for stu- dent~ at local high schools to achieve the scholarship, including GPA, Civic involvement, and a Business Focus for the future. * Student-of-the-Month: This monthly luncheon rec- ognizes 2 students from each of the three local High Schools, TTHS, Rancho Vista, and Litfield who have demonstrated some type of outstanding behavior. Stu- dents are recon=nended by a teacher and selected by the Principal of the School. Awards have gone to students who make it a point to befriend new students,.have turned in lost money, student government leaders, ath- letes, and those who have the honor of being the most improved student. Youth Commission - Youth Leadership Procram: Career Path - School to Work Transition: SPECIAL EVENTS The Chamber is committed to insuring that Temecula maintain the COAm~LUnity spirit it h as become known for. This comes from promoting the people and the corm~unity from within. · Arts Festival: The Chamber not only promotes business but the unity and cultural diversity that makes Temecula unique. This year, the Chamber has taken a more active role in the Festival through assis- tance with promotion and advertising. * Parades: Heavily involved with the City in pro- ducing and staffing the Parade. In addition - promote Holiday Lights and Festive Sights event. * Temecula Town Association: Joint event with the Temecula Town Association to be scheduled in October, 1994 SERVICES PROVIDE BY THE TEMECULA VALLEY cNAMmER OF COMMERCE * Museum: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce has continued to support the Temecula Museum by maintaining a visitors center within the Museum to make COx~uLLUnity information accessible to visitors of the Museum and 01d Town. The Chamber is also helping to distribute the 'new Temecula Museum brochure. * Trade Show: The Chamber will be participating in three tourism trade shows; Mexico City, Los Angeles and New York. CITY PROMOTION The Chamber's Local Business Promotion is a committee comprised of 7 individuals representing major Retail- ers, Developers and the local Media. * Shop Temecula First Ad CamPalert: This Con~nittee is working on an ongoing, Did You Know Ad Campaign, to be run in all local media. The Campaign will illus- trate the wealth of resources Temecula represents to provide goods and services to meet every consumer need. The Campaign also highlights how the con=aunity benefits by the regeneration of funds being directly invested into City coffers from tax dollars spent in the City. The group is also working on a City-wide business pro- motion through a program to help.educate retailers on customer service. * Busimess Showcase: Over the last year the Chamber has showcased over 500 local businesses to over 3,000 local people. The showcase is designed to show the coaL~L~unity who's doing business in Temecula and the resources which are available by local merchants SERVICES PROVIDE BY THE TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF CC~I~RCE INFORMATION The Cheer provides 3 paid staff people and 3 Volun- teers to handle the organizing, updating, maintenance and dissemination of information to Visitors, Busi- nesses, and People interested in relocating both fami- lies and businesses to Temecula. The Chamber office will receive a projected 32,000 calls, 7,000 visitors, and mail out over 3,000 packages of information in 1993. * Relocation Packages: This package includes infor- mation on the history of Temecula, schools, utilities, city and Government Offices, Law Enforcement, Hospi- tals, and a basic c~unity profile. * DemocraDhic and census Information: The Chamber assembles, customizes, and distributes current informa- tion including census, conununity grown figures, demo- graphic studies, and an economic profile from both Riverside County and the State of California for new residents and businesses. * Calendar of Events: Staff interacts with all groups and organizations to keep a current calendar for the community and the benefit of the organization to avoid duplication. of events or dates. * MAPS: The Cheer sponsors and maintains a cur- rent street map and buyers guide which is available at our office. * Pictorial: The Pictorial is a comprehensive guide to Temecula. It provides a profile of business and industry, medical and health services, lifestyle and real estate, education, transportation, shopping, Old Town, arts and culture, recreation, and City and County resources. It also serves as a business directory for Chamber members. * Residential Guides/Information: The staff main- tains information on residential developments, median home prices, and rental information. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TEM~U~A VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE The variety and scope of Chamber activities is unlim- ited, depending on the needs of its members and the desire and ability of the Chamber to carry them out. The Chamber represents and promotes the area's economy, and encourages business and industrial investment, broadeningthe tax base and providing employment. To business prospects and newcomers, the Chamber repre- sents the c~u~unity's front door. The Temecula Cham- ber is also involved in non-commercial areas, such as education, human relations, environmental, cultural, and governmental concerns. These challenges have caused the T.V.C.C. to become a viable force in seeking solutions in today's issues. The united voice of the Chamber often proves effective and beneficial to busi- nesses and the conuuunity where a single voice goes unheard. ~mhassadorship through staff involvememt= Rotary Economic Development Corporation Community Recreational Center Arts Festival Old Town Temecula Merchants Association Temecula Boys and Girls Club Scholarships/TVHS/RV~S/L~S Temecula valley High School Grad-Night KRTM Temecula Valley NLiss/Teen/Mrs. Pageant Temecula MuSeum Inland Empire Tourism Council Temecuia Valley Film Council American Bear Association All American City Secretary's Day Temecula Town Association Tamecula Valley Playhouse Special Ol~n~ics Promising Christmas Jaycee's Balloon and Wine Festival Winter Rod Run Southern California chamber Coalition California Chamber of C~mnerce and U.S. State Office of Tourism Chamber of Cor~nerce SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TEME~u~A VALLEY CHAMBER OF COIE(ERCE Other Projects: Temecula Valley Guide to Health and Human Services Contributions of Governmental Periodicals to the Library More Signage for Old Town and wine Country Marketing a Program to continue the Temecula Ad Campaign Bi-Annual Shop Temecula First Car~paigns '.Education Internship Progrars for High School Students -, !!~, ,,.:i' '~i:~ .Aoes a long way ':~'' "for the City. ";'7 ":. ~::"'7':' · .:'}. :. ,.,. ,.'... Every dollar spent in town is multiplied 5-7 times in its effect on our local economy. Not only does money spent on in-town purchases help our local merchants to restock their "inventor.~ but it also helps them to pay employees who then, in turn, can spend their salaries in our fine city. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON PARTICULAR RETAIL BUSINESSES IN OUR COMMUNITY, CONTACT THE TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OFFICE AT (909) 676-5090 .~ .. · - ;~.t-. ~.. 8 $ $ $ $ $ $ ...there are 2813 businesses in Temecula? Among these, there are: · s~ ~ppore~ Stores· ~0 Specio"y Stores · 14 General Merchandise Stores · 47 Grocery/Drug Stares 8 · 22 Stationary/Book Stores · 116 Fast Food Restaurants · 13 Shoe Stores · 144 Home Furnishing Stores · 31 Sporting Goods Stores · 75 Restaurants · 15 Jewelry Stores · 17 Garden Supply Stores · 13 Department Stores · 11 Hardware Stores · 14 Auto Dealerships · 7 Florists · 37 Office Furniture Stores · 45 Gift/Novelty Stores · 11 Music Stores · 146 Auto Repair/Supply Stores · 4 Hotels · 16 Health Care Services Need we say more? SHOP TEMECULA FIRST! FOR MORE INFORMATION ON PARTICULAR RETAIL BUSINESSES IN OUR COMMUNITY, CONTACT THE TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OFFICE AT (909) 676-5090 · · ,'(7 ' '~" ...... ...-, .. :;.8'. · . ~'.,': -~ · :.~. . ~' $ $ $ CITY OF TEMECULA AGI~,I~IENT This Agreement, made is triplicate, this day of , 1994, by and between the TEMECULA I~h'T~EVELOPIVlENT AGENCY (RDA), a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as RDA), and the TEMECULA V~I .I .F.y CHAMBER OF COMIvtF~RCE, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinaf~r re, feared to as 'CHAMBER'). I. l~ECITALS A. RDA is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, and residential center; disseminafing information relative thereto, and of properly following up and giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various activities of City and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests. B. CHAMBER has special knowledge, experience and facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of RDA; and to publicize and exploit its advantages. C. Such activities are recognized by hw as being in the public interest and serving a public purpose. II. AGREF_,MENT NOW, THEREFORE,' it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. CHAMBER shall undertake, during the 1994-95 fiscal year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of RDA and to particularly render the following services: 1. To maintain suitable quarters and employ competent professional personnel to carry on the promotional activities herein stated. 2. T0 promp~y answer all correspondence relative to the business, industrial, and residential advantages and opportunities in the City of Temeeula, and to disseminate information by correspondence, newspaper publicity and personal contacts favorably advertising such advantages and opportunities. 3. To prepare information for articles and news stories, assist in gathering news items, descriptive of City's resources; and to develop proper data whereby outside interests and individuals may be induced to locate in Temeeula. 4. To aid in property value preservation and the development and use of unoccupied and vacant properties. 5. To interview business and industrial executives with the view of urging the establishment of their business activities in Temecula. 6. To promote and invite trade and business meetings and celebrations whereby outside interests and individuals may become aequainUxl with the advantages and opportunities in Temeoula. 7. To assist City in all ways possible in the furtherance of the activities of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the City of Temecula. 8. To maintain a public office within the business area of the City, easily accessible and fully equipped for the purpose of di~min~tlng information and answering correspondence and inquiries regarding the City. Said office shall be open to the public no less than eight hours a day, except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. CHAMBER shall employ a full-time Executive Director, a portion of whose duties shall be to promote the welfare and activities of the City of Temecula; its industries, business activities and opportunities, residential advantages; and other matters of general public interest. B. That in consideration of the services to be performed by the CHAMBER for the City, as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, the RDA hereby agrees to pay CHAMBER, during the term of this Agreement, the sum of $45,000 for the fiscal year 1994-95, payable on execution of this Agreement. C. In the event the RDA should desire any additional service, CHAMBER shall, upon request of the RDA, furnish an itemized statement of the estimated cost thereof, and the RDA may modify or alter any such plan or proposal in any particular area or may reject said plan in its entirety, or may direct the submission of a new plan or proposal which may be accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the final approval of any such plan and execution thereof by CHAM~ER, as herein provided, RDA will pay to CHAMBER the cost thereof, which cost shall not exceed by more than fifteen percent (15%) the estimated cost of such plan or proposal unless with the express consent of RDA. All money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of CHAMBER showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of CHAMBER. CHAMBER shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for its services or usual expenses. D. The Executive Director of the CHAMBER shall prepare and submit to the RDA Executive Director of his designee a semi-annuai written report specifying the activities of the CHAMBER during the preceding semester. Said report shall be prepared in format acceptable to the RDA. E. CHAMBER agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the RDA and its elected of~eials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of CHAMBER's acts or omissions of those of CHAMBER's employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by hw. F. CHAMBER shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in fun force and dfeot for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers' compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the RDA is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with the CHAMBER and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the Executive Din~tor befor~ execution of this Agreement by the RDA. Notwithstanding any inconsismt stamment in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the.protection offered by the policy shall; 1. Include the RDA as the insured or named as an additional insured covering the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. 2. Include the RDA, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. 3. Provide the following minimum limits: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the l ~hor Code of the State of California and Employen' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the Agency. 5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancelhtion of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the RDA shall be notified by registered marl, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before date of expiration or cancellation is effective. G. Any deductible of self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the RDA. At the option of-the RDA, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects to the RDA, its officers, officials and employees; or the CHAMBER shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation claim adrninistmtion and defense expenses. H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be enfi~ed to reasonable attomcy's fees, in addition to any other relid to which it may be entitled. I. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1994, and mating June 30, 1995. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days writran notice with any sums due and payable hereunder. K. CHAMBER shall promptly furnish the RDA, upon completion of CHAMBER's operating year, certified copies of annual operating statement. IN ~ITNESS WI~-REOF, the RDA has caused its corporam name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the RDA Chairperson and attested to by the RDA City Clerk/Agency Secretary, both thereunto duly authorized, and the CHA/VIBER has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove vaiUen. TE~ REDEVI~ OPMENT AGENCY TEMECULA V,AY.I.F.y CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Ronald J. Parks, Chaixi}erson Douglas Davies, President A'rrP_ST: A'ri'~r. ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretazy Leigh Engdahl, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: orson, City Attorney 'P te