HomeMy WebLinkAbout012699 CC Agendain compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JANUARY 26, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
5:30 :P.M. - Closed ~Sessionof the City Council and Redevelopment Agency pursuant
to Government Code Sections:
ConferenCe with the City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation involving
the City and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: a)
Quality Contractors, Inc. vs. Temecula Valley Museum, Inc. and b) Claim iof
Westside City II.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956~9(b)~with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect
to each :matter, the; City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached
where there is ~a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and/or the
Agency basedon existing facts and circumstances.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALLTO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 99-04
Resolution: No. 99-04
Vintage Singers
Pastor Robert Gonzalez of House to House Ministry
Councilman Roberts
R:~,genda\012699
1
ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Ford
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
2
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be Enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adol3tion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of December 15, 1998.
R:~genda\012699
2
3
5
7
Resolution Approvin.cl List of Demands _
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Mystic Lake
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Direct Staff to send a letter of support for the acquisition of property for the
expansion of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area
Service Authority for the Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A SERVICE
AUTHORITY FOR ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No.
22761 ('located at the westerly corner of Ynez Road at Preece Lane)
RECOMMENDATON:
6.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Securities for public improvements in Tract No. 22761;
6.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Accept Subdivision Improvements in Tract No. 22762 ('located westerly of the intersection
of Ynez Road at Preece Lane)
RECOM MEN DATION:
7.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Securities for public improvements in Tract No. 22762;
7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
R:~Agenda\012699
3
8
10
11
Release Bond for Traffic Si.qnalization Mitigation Fees for Parcel 3 in Parcel Map No.
19580-1 (located west of Diaz Road and north of Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize release of bond for Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees for Parcel 3 in
Parcel Map No. 19580-1;
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the owners and surety.
Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula Rod Run 1999 Event in Old Town
(Front Street and related streets between Moreno Street and First Street)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET
CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1999 EVENT AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR
THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS
Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Ecluipment
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL
PROJECT
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for
Construction and Fundin.cl of the Western Bypass Corridor - Proiect No. PW95-07
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of
Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for
construction and funding of the Western Bypass Corridor;
11.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially
the form attached to the Agenda Report.
R:~Agenda~12699
4
12 1999 Workers' Compensation Covera.cle Annual Renewal
RECOM MEN DATION:
12.1 Approve renewing the annual agreement with California Compensation (CAL Comp)
for the City's Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance, subject to final approval
as to form by the City Attorney.
13 Award of Construction Contract for City Hall Tenant Improvement
13.1
13.2
13.3
Award a construction contract for tenant improvement work within City Hall to Rizzo
Construction, Inc., Temecula, CA, in the amount of $36,585.00 and authorize the
Mayor to execute the contract;
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed
the contingency amount of $3,658.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
Approve an appropriation of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000.00) from the General
Fund undesignated fund balance.
14 Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
14.1 Award a contract for P.C. Workstations to Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress, California,
in the amount of $2,482.56 per unit, for a total purchase amount of $39,720.96.
15 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-01
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO ADD A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 (PDO-2) TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA
ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA
ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004,
AND ADDING SECTION 17.22.110 THROUGH 17.22.118 TO
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY NO. 2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0397
R:~Agenda\012699
5
16 Second Readin.a of Ordinance No. 99-02
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND
952-'150-003) CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION(S)
FROM HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMMERCIAL (HT), MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M), AND LOW MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (LM), TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
17 Second Readin.cl of Ordinance No. 99-03
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF
THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019,
020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH
17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. '1 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\012699
6
TEMECULA.:GOMMUNI:TYSERVICES DISTRICT:. MEETING
.... '. . . :' ::,~ .~j.~: ........... :'.. ............................ ·
":';':"'.' ' .:;:!: ... ' ' . .;;.;.!:i. · . ' " ':~.'
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-01
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 15, 1998;
1.2 Approve the minutes of January 12, 1999.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
R:~Agenda\012699
7
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 9, 1999, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar,
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\012699
8
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING "';:' · ' ".~. ' . ...==. .......
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01
Resolution: No. RDA 99-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 15, 1998;
1.2 Approve the minutes of January 12, 1999.
2 Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelol~ment Agency for
Construction and Funding of the Western Bypass Corridor - Project No. PW95-07
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of
Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for
construction and funding of the Western Bypass Corridor;
R:%Agenda\012699
9
2.2 Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in
substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report;
2.3 Authorize the budgeted expenditure of $877,602.26 by the Redevelopment Agency
for the Agency's share of the costs to date for the construction and funding of the
Western Bypass Corridor, as well as authorize the expenditure for future project
costs incurred as approved by the City or Agency.
Acquisition of Tax-Defaulted Property for Affordable Housing
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC SALE OF
CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE
CITY OF: TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE
PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES
AGENCY BUSINESS
4 Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance Programs (First -Time Homebuyer and Employee
Relocation)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Amend the First -Time Homebuyer Program Parameters (Attachment 1) eliminating
the $120,000 purchase price ceiling and allowing the purchase price to be limited
only by the applicant's ability to qualify for financing while meeting income eligibility
requirements;
4.2 Approve the attached Program Parameters (Attachment 2) for the proposed
Employee Relocation Program.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 9, 1999, scheduled to follow the Community Services District
Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\012699
10
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval
of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
18
Appeal of the Plannin.q Commission's Denial of Planning Application No. PA98-0347
(Development Plan) - The desi.cln, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totalin.q 81,885 square feet located on two parcels
consistin.q of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping (located on the west
side of Commerce Center Drive adjacent to Murrieta Creek north of Via Montezuma)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AFFRIMING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-
0347 DEVELOPMENT PLAN -THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF 15 SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL,
MANUFACTURING, OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 81,885
SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON TWO PARCELS CONSISTING
OF 6.02 ACRES WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
LANDSCAPING LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, ADJACENT TO MURRIETA
CREEK, NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-400-017 AND 921-400-044
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19
Review and Approval of the 25th Year Community Development Block Grant Application
Proposals for FY 1999/00
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation
from the Finance Committee and staff.
R:~genda~12699
11
20
21
Consideration of an Ordinance Amendin.q Sections 9.14.010 and 9.14.020 of the
Temecula Municipal Code Prohibiting the Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages and the
Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Bevera.qes in Public Places
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 9.14.010 AND
9.14.020 PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES
20.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 9.14.010 AND 9.14.020
PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES
Adoption of Ur.clencV Ordinance Suspendinfi Operation of City's Election Campaign
Contribution and Expenditure Limitation Ordinance Pending Resolution Le.qal Action
Challenqin.q the Validity of Proposition 208 and Resolution Establishin.q Voluntary
Expenditure Ceilin.q
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA SUSPENDING THE OPERATION AND
EFFECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 97-04 AND SECTION 2.08.060
OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND CAMPAIGN
EXPENDITURES PENDING RESOLUTION OF LEGAL
CHALLENGES TO THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL REFORM
ACT OF 1996 (PROPOSITION 208)
R:~Agenda\012699
12
21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS
OF THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE
VOLUNTARY EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR CITY ELECTIONS,
AS ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE
22 Recommendations for Implementing Economic Development Strategy Report by Dr. John
Husinq
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Implement recommendations of the Husing Economic Development Strategy report
as outlined in the following staff report.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 9, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\012699
13
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 15, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28721 Front Street,
Temecula (APN 922-073-017, 922-046-022, and 922-073-024). The negotiating
parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, Cleveland
Investment Company, and First and Front LLP. Under negotiation is the price and
terms of payment to the real property interests proposed to be acquired.
2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a) with respect to three matters of existing litigation involving the
City and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: Clark vs. City
of Temecula, City of Temecula vs. KR Palm Plaza, and claim of Westside City II,
LLC ('Bill Dend¥).
3. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the sale of real property located at (APN 950-583-013) 45012
Corte Christina. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Temecula and Arthur Lopez. Under negotiation are the price and terms of
payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
PRELUDE MUSIC
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,
and Roberts.
Councilmember: None.
The prelude music was provided by Triple J Chorus from Redhawk Elementary.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Councilman Lindemans.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Ford.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Achievement to Brandon Knight for obtaining the rank of Eagle Scout
Apprising the City Council of his Eagle Scout project, Brandon Knight accepted, with
appreciation, the Certificate of Achievement.
Proclamation honoring Retiring City Mana.qer Bradley
Commending Mr. Bradley on the many accomplishments the City has attained over the
past five years as a result of his service, Mayor Roberts presented to City Manager
Bradley a Proclamation proclaiming December 15, 1998, as non Bradley Day. Mr.
Bradley accepted the Proclamation and relayed his delight with having had the
opportunity to work with the City of Temecula.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Recognizing City Manager Bradley for his many accomplishments over the past five
years, Councilman Comerchero as well thanked City staff for a successful year and relayed his
appreciation for the efforts put forth by City staff in order to achieve these successes.
B. Mayor Pro Tern Ford informed the viewing public that the City Council was aware of a
malfunctioning City controller which had created traffic at the Ynez Road/Rancho California
Road intersection; advised that two lanes have been dedicated to the northbound loop ramp;
that restriping will be occur on Friday evening; and that new signs will be posted. Mr. Ford as
well noted that two right-hand turns have been dedicated at Ynez Road/VVinchester Road and
that restriping will be forthcoming.
C. Having attended a recent Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)
meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Ford advised that it is the consensus of other cities to not sign the
Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Planning Agreement at this time and that additional
information would be provided at upcoming City Council meetings.
D. Although the City's traffic concerns will be mitigated by on-going and upcoming projects,
Councilman Stone requested the placement of Police Officers during peak hours at the major
intersections in order to assist with the congestion. Mr. Stone suggested that the matter be
discussed by the Public/Traffic and Safety Commission and that a recommendation be
forwarded to the City Council.
E. Advising that studies indicate that 50% of the City's traffic impact is due to individuals
traveling to the City of Temecula from other cities, Councilman Stone commented on the
significant growth in the French Valley area; noted that the City does not derive any mitigation
fees to offset those impacts; and, therefore, suggested that this matter be addressed by the
formation of a subcommittee.
2
F. Paying tribute to retiring City Manager Bradley, Councilman Stone commended him for
his abilities to guide the City Council and the City which has resulted in many successes for the
City.
G. Councilman Lindemans wished everyone a Happy Holiday Season and as well wished
City Manager Bradley an enjoyable and safe retirement.
H. Concurring with Councilman Stone's suggestion for the placement of law enforcement at
major intersections during peak hours, Mayor Roberts requested that this be accomplished prior
to the Holiday Season.
I. In response to Councilman Stone's comments relative to potential mitigation fees from
other cities, Mayor Roberts noted that the County is in the process of compiling such an
assistance package and noted that additional information will be provided at a future City
Council meeting.
J. Mayor Roberts informed the City Councilmembers and the viewing audience that four
City Councilmembers from Douglas, Arizona, the City Manager, and the Community Economic
Development Director had visited the City of Temecula for a day in order to view the City's Old
Town Streetscape Improvements.
K. By way of overheads, Mayor Roberrs reviewed the on-going progress with regard to the
High Speed Rail, commenting on the reality of such a rail being constructed in the near future
and advising that a station will be constructed in the Southwestern Riverside County area.
L. In closing, Mayor Roberrs echoed the comments made by his fellow City
Councilmembers as they relate to retiring City Manager Bradley and wished him an enjoyable
retirement.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
Resolution Approving List of Demands _
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
3 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the minutes of November 10, 1998;
3.2 Approve the minutes of November 17, 1998.
4 Financial Statements for the Three Months ended September 30, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended
September 30, 1998.
5 Actin.q City Mana,qer/Deputy City Mana.qer Employment A.qreement with Shawn
Nelson and Establishment of Deputy City Manager Classification
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the Acting City Manager Employment Agreement;
5.2 Adopt the revised Schedule of Authorized Positions;
5.3 Adopt the classification specification for Deputy City Manager.
6 Little Professor Book Company Request
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Oppose the acquisition of Ingram Book Companies by Barnes & Noble.
7 Contract Inspection Services Agreement for JAS Pacific, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with JAS Pacific Consulting
Services, Inc. in the amount of $64,960 to continue providing building
inspection services to the Building and Safety Department;
7.2 Approve an appropriation of $36,960.00 from unreserved fund balance to the
Building and Safety budget.
4
9
10
Tract Map No. 28553-F ('located south of North General Kearney Road alon.q east
side of Mar.qarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Tract Map No. 28553-F in conformance with the Conditions of
Approval;
8.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
8.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as
security for the agreements.
Tract Map No. 28526 ('located north of Ranch California Road - east of Mar.clarita
Road in the Mar.clarita Villafie Specific Plan No. 199)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Tract Map No. 28526 in conformance with the Conditions of
Approval;
9.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
9.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as
security for the agreements.
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (within Tract
No. 22915-1 -located at the southeasterly corner of the intersection of Meadows
Parkway at Rancho Vista Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22915-1)
11
12
13
14
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System ('within Tract
Nos. 22916-2 and 22916-F- located at the northeast corner of the intersection of
Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NOS. 22916-2 AND 22916-F)
Completion and Acceptance of the Construction Contract for Mar.qarita Road Storm
Drain - Project No. PW97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
12.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Siqnal Installation on Pauba Road at Fire
Station No. 84 - Project No. PW97-26
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
13.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Consent to Record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant Easement for Portion
of Lot 539 of Tract No. 3883
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
6
RESOLUTION NO. 98-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION
OF AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A
GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES
FOR A PORTION OF LOT 539 OF TRACT 3883 FOR
PURPOSES OF RECORDATION BUT NOT ACCEPTING
THIS DEDICATION AT THIS TIME
15 Accept Offer of Grant of Easement for Drainage Purposes in Portion of Lot 539 of
Tract No. 3883 ('located southerly of the intersection of Calle Madero at North
General Kearnev Road
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE
OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES FOR A PORTION OF LOT
539 OF TRACT NO. 3883
16 Approval of Purchase and Sale A.qreements for Ac.quisition of Real Property for the
Overland Overpass Project
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND CONNIlE HILL AND DEAN HILL
16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-124
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND CONNIE HILL
7
17 Approval of First Amendment to the Owner Participation A.clreement between the City
of Temecula and International Rectifier Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN FIRST
AMENDMENT TO OWNER PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION, A
DELWARE CORPORATION
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 17.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
At 7:40 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services
District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:52 P.M., the City Council
resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
18 Front Street Name Chan.qe to Old Town Front Street from Highway 79S northerly up
to Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Consider changing the name of Front Street to Old Town Front Street from
Highway 79S to Rancho California Road;
18.2 If approved, adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE NAME OF FRONT
STREET TO OLD TOWN FRONT STREET FROM
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
18.3 Consider approving freeway signage and provide direction for the installation
of signage for Old Town Temecula;
18.4 Appropriate General Fund Reserves as necessary.
Councilman Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Management Analyst Adams reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material),
highlighting the three noted Options; advised that a fourth Option has been offered
(directing southbound traffic to exit Rancho California Road); and noted that Caltrans
has acknowledged this option and could provide a similar sign package as noted for the
aforementioned options. Mr. Adams advised that once the closing of escrow for the
Mercantile building has been completed, the City may apply for historical registration and
that this building would then be eligible for a small historical freeway sign.
Director of Public Works Kicak provided additional clarification as to Caltrans rationale
associated with the various options and advised that Caltrans would approve one of the
proposed options, including newly proposed Option No. 4, predicated on the funding
source.
Mayor Roberts relayed his desire to utilize both off-ramps and that signage be placed
both northbound and southbound.
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
Mr. Ron Walton and Mr. Ed Dool relayed their support of the proposed name change;
requested that additional signage be placed at Rancho California Road for northbound to
southbound travelers; and requested the approval of Option No.3 with the addition of two
signs at Rancho California Road.
Speaking in support of this project, Mayor Pro Tem Ford thanked Mr. Walton and Mr.
Dool for their efforts associated with this matter.
For Councilman Lindemans, City Manager Bradley advised that this project would be
funded through General Fund monies not Redevelopment Agency monies.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Ford moved to approve Option No. 3 with the placement of
additional signage at northbound of Rancho California Road subject to Caltrans
approval. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who abstained.
Director of Public Works Kicak advised the City Council that the awarding of contract
and approval of signs will be agendized at a future meeting.
19 Front Street Name Change to Jefferson Avenue from Rancho California Road
northerly up to Via Montezuma
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Consider changing the name of Front Street to Jefferson Avenue from Via
Montezuma to Rancho California Road;
19.2 If approved, adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-127
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE NAME OF FRONT
STREET TO JEFFERSON AVENUE FROM VIA
MONTEZUMA TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
Management Analyst Adams reviewed the staff report (of record).
There being no requests to speak, Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20 Appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem for the Year 1999
RECOM MEN DATION:
20.1
Appoint the Mayor who will preside until the end of calendar year 1999 and
appoint the Mayor Pro Tem who will assume the duties of the Mayor in the
Mayor's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1999.
MOTION: Mayor Roberts nominated Mayor Pro Tem Ford to serve as the City's Mayor
for 1999. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
Commending Mayor Roberts on a successful year, Councilman Stone referenced
several accomplishments for the year, highlighting the efforts undertaken to increase
public communication with the City Council/City by way of E-mail and Web Page.
Echoing Councilman Stone's comments, Councilman Comerchero commended Mayor
Roberts on a job well done.
Councilman Lindemans commended Mayor Roberts on a job well done and wished
Mayor Elect Ford a successful year.
Commenting on the City's successes of 1998, Mayor Roberts commended the City
Council as a whole in accomplishing them.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero nominated Councilman Stone to serve as the City's
Mayor Pro Tem for 1999. The motion was seconded by Mayor Elect Ford and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
10
21 Award of Construction Contract for the Overland Drive Overcrossin.q at Interstate
Route 15 - Project No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Award a contract for the construction of Overland Drive Overcrossing at
Interstate Route 15, Project No. PW95-11, to C.C. Myers, Inc. in the amount
of $6,008,546.20 subject to approval by Caltrans as recommended, and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
21.2
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed
the contingency amount of $600,854.62, which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount.
Director of Public Works Kicak reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material),
including supplemental material (of record).
Advising that specific requirements must be followed in order to award this contract, City
Manager Bradley noted that the City must own all associated property; advised that staff
is in the process of working with the title company to complete all necessary documents;
and, therefore, he recommended that the City Council authorize him to award the
contract once the necessary documents have been completed.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone moved to authorize the City Manager to award
this contract once all necessary requirements have been met. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Elect Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
22 Consideration of Sponsorship Requests
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Consider the sponsorship request for Temecula Rod Run;
22.2 Consider the sponsorship request for Frontier Days Rodeo;
22.3 Consider the sponsorship request for Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine
Festival.
Assistant City Manager O'Grady presented the staff report (as per written material),
providing a brief overview of the requests and advising that representatives of each
organization are in attendance.
By way of overheads, Ms. Melody Brunsting, Temecula Town Association, provided a
detailed overview of the Association's sponsorship request for two events - Temecula
Rod Run and Frontier Days Rodeo, highlighting the benefits these events have on the
City as well as the community by way charities.
Mr. John Sterling, General Manager, further reviewed and provided clarification with
regard to the proposed budget, commenting on the difficulties to budget Police and Fire
costs and advised that with the exception of 20%, all owed Police and Fire costs from
previous events have been repayed.
11
Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone commented on the Association's increase in sponsorship
request over last year ($40,000 from $10,000) to which Ms. Brunsting responded by
addressing increased costs associated with Police services, noting that this cost is a
variable and, therefore, difficult to control.
It was suggested by Councilman Lindemans that the City be responsible for associated
Police and Fire costs; that the City provide a sponsorship; and that if the organization
were to attain a net profit, that it be returned to the City.
Mayor Elect Ford suggested that the City approve a $10,000 sponsorhsip to the
organization; that the City be responsible for the Police/Fire support services; and that
the organization be required to repay the $10,000 sponsorship; but that the organization
retain any net profit.
Considering the associated costs with the sale of alcoholic beverages at this event,
Mayor Roberts suggested the elimination of the sale of alcohol. Ms. Brunsting noted
that although the suggestion could be reviewed for next year's event, she advised that
certain sponsors were obtained with the understanding that there would be sale of
alcohol.
Councilman Comerchero suggested that the Association be responsible to pay $5,000
for associated Police/Fire costs and that any amount in excess of that be the
responsibility of the City and, thereby, making the cost a fixed expense versus a
variable.
Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone concurred that the Association should be responsible for a
portion of the Police/Fire costs associated with this event and that the sponsorship
request should be reviewed as a separate issue.
Councilman Lindemans suggested a $15,000 sponsorship for this year; that Police/Fire
costs be paid by the City; and that all net profits be retained by the Association with the
understanding that 50% be set aside as seed money for the year 2000 event.
Councilman Comerchero concurred with a $10,000 sponsorship fee in the form of a loan
and that the Association be responsible for $10,000 of Police/Fire costs - costs in
excess of that amount be the responsibility of the City.
Additional Council discussion ensued with following motion being offered:
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the agreement modified as
follows: that the City be responsible for associated costs relative to Police/Fire services
necessary for the Temecula Rod Run event and that $10,000 be approved in the form of
a loan which is to be repaid to the City prior to the Association disbursing any funds to
any non-profit organizations. The motion was seconded by Mayor Elect Ford and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
Mr. John Sterling, General Manager, advised that Police costs associated with the
Frontier Days Rodeo are nominal.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the Frontier Days Rodeo
Agreement with a sponsorship of $10,000 and that the City be responsible for any
12
Police/Fire costs in the event they were to arise. The motion was seconded by Mayor
Elect Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 9:58 P.M., a recess was taken and the meeting reconvened at 10:09 P.M.
Mr. Bob Brown, representing the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, reviewed
the administration of the 1999 Festival and briefly highlighted proposed changes to
ensure a successful festival.
Ms. Carol Popejoy-Hime, General Manager, in detail reviewed the proposed layout of
the 1999 Festival.
Mr. Marry Cooper, Public Relations and Marketing Firm representing the Association,
further commented and addressed issues such marketing positioning and
tourism/economic development.
Mr. Brown addressed and clarified the newly proposed balanced budget, requesting a
$35,000 cash sponsorship; that no costs be considered for Police/Fire services; and
advised that the Association does not make charitable contributions with its net profit.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the agreement with a sponsorship
of $35,000; it was requested that $5,000 be deducted from the sponsorship to pay for
previously owed Police/Fire services and, thereby, issuing a check in the amount of
$30,000. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
23 Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Oral report from staff on status of annexation proposal.
Mayor Elect Ford noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Community Development Director Thornhill presented the oral report, noting the
following:
· That Thursday, December 10, 1998, LAFCO approved the City's application
for the annexation of Redhawk/Vail Ranch areas;
· That the City Council will hold a Protest Hearing within 60 days of the LAFCO
hearing;
· That the likely election date will be November 1999 with an effective date of
July 2000;
· That staff will be recommending to the City Council to direct staff to hold a
separate election vote for Redhawk and for Vail Ranch;
· That future annexation workshops will be scheduled.
13
In response to Councilman Stone, Community Services Director Parker provided
clarification as to the City's fee methodology, advising that the City does no assess
vacant land for slope maintenance services with exception of park and recreation
services.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to receive and file the report. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Mayor Elect Ford who abstained.
ITEMS ADDED TO THE AGENDA BASED ON SUBSEQUENT NEED
City Attorney Thorson provided background information and clarification for the
placement of the proposed subsequent need items, noting that the work had progressed
faster than had been anticipated and, therefore, the proposed changes must be
approved and implemented within the week. Because these items arose after the
agenda was posted and action is required prior to the next meeting, Mr. Thorson noted
that the City Council may make a motion for subsequent need.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved that the below-mentioned subsequent need
items be discussed as per Mr. Thorson's comments. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
24
Additional Work on Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15, Brid.qe
Widenin.q and Northbound Ramp Improvements - Proiect No. PW95-12 and Front
Street Widenin.q Rancho California Road to Moreno Drive - PW98-08
RECOMMENDATION:
22.4
Approve Change order No. 12 to Widen Front Street from Rancho California
Road to Moreno Drive PW98-08 in the amount of $106,506.00 and authorize
the City Manager to sign the Change Order.
22.5 Authorize the City Manager to approve additional contingency amounts not
to exceed $10,650.00, which is the 10% contingency amount.
Senior Engineer Hughes presented the staff report (as per supplemental material).
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
25 Old Town Streetscape Entry Archways Project, PW97-05 - Howe Weldin.q &
Fabrication - Contract Order No. 2
RECOMMENDATION:
22.6 Approve Contract Change Order 2 in the amount of $7,726.70, and authorize
the City Manager to execute the Contract Change Order.
14
It was noted that Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone would be abstaining with regard to this
issue.
Senior Engineer Hughes reviewed the staff report (as per supplemental material),
advising that the costs associated with this Change Order will cover materials only and
that the contractor will not be deriving a profit.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Elect Stone who abstained.
City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council will be handling the construction of
this project and that the Redevelopment Agency will be handling the funding of the
project.
Senior Engineer Hughes briefly reviewed the location of the brass plaque inserts.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Bradley reiterated his delight with having had the opportunity to work for
the City of Temecula.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that no actions were taken under the Brown Act and that
the City Council provided direction to him with respect to the three litigation matters and
that with respect to the real property items, final action would be taken in open session.
15
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:57 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday,
January 12, 1999, at 7:00 P.M.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
16
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the
amount of $3,361,560.69.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 99-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula
on the 26th day of January, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 99-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
01/07/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/14/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/26/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/07/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01126199 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD - DEBT SERVICE
$ 243,782.62
9,682.75
91,783.87
1,630.83
138.88
28,094.75
1,116,280.95
894,626.22
19,441.48
688,914.35
1,936.34
70,693.38
14,404.06
14,758.23
9,935.80
1,250.00
2,471,171.37
192,557.89
543,625.25
154,206.18
3,361,560.69
3,207,354.51
100 GENERAL
1: :.~ R DA-LOW/MOD
1.5{3 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BYFUND:
IPR~EC R OF FINANC0~ ASSISTANT
SHAWN NELSON, ACTING CITY MANAGER
113,767.18
3,172.53
.:4,555.56
67.17
169.78
2,125.92
555.50
1,653.18
685.50
2,746.58
1,266.06
3,441.22
154.206.18
3,361,560.69
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 12
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 ~NSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
99,010.15
4,375.57
35,527.12
451.27
65.39
2,516.79
1,116,048.22
536,345.91
2,500.00
662,347.32
642.44
3,728.13
334.59
7,278.47
TOTAL 2,471,171.37
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53506
53507
53507
53507
53507
53508
53508
53509
53509
53509
53509
53509
53509
53509
53509
53510
53511
53512
53513
53514
53515
53516
53517
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
G1~07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
000724
000116
000116
000116
000116
002410
002410
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
001281
000936
001947
002878
000924
001374
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN
A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
AFLAC
ALHAMBRA GROUP
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AMERIGAS
BRIDLEVALE HOA (298)
BUSINESS INFORMATION SY
C A P P O, INC.
CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF
CALVARY CHAPEL OF MURRI
RECREATION SUPPLIES
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
COBRA/GREEK/NELSON 1/99
DEC JANITORIAL SERVICES
DEC JANITORIAL SERVICES
003552 CANCER
003552 EXP PROT
003552 EXP PROT
003552 EXP PROT
003552 HOSP [C
003552 STD
003552 STD
003552 STD
DESIGN SVC:BUTTERFIELD STG PRK
FIRST AID TRAINING SUPPLIES
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
BRIDLEVALE HOA:CORTE CHRISTINA
ON-SITE COMPUTER TRAINING
CAPPO CF:1/18-22:VOLLMUTH
TERMINATION OF UCC-I:BLIND PIG
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
190-183-999-5380
001-2310
190-2310
340-2310
001-1180
190-180-999-5250
001-164-603-5250
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
300-2330
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
300-2330
190-180-999-5248
190-180-999-5261
001-162-999-5263
165-199-812-5804
001-150-999-5250
001-140-999-5261
280-199-999-5250
190-2900
1,340.95
602.19
29.75
18.58
37.16
1,722.00
211.00
262.10
202.13
55.8O
5.47
17.50
555.20
112.00
8.00
11.64
75.00
8.62
74.OO
600.00
245.00
20.00
100.00
1,340.95
687.68
1,933.00
1,218.20
11.64
75.00
8.62
74.00
600.00
245.00
20.00
100.00
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
53518
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
003554
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
CANADA LIFE
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
003554 LIFE INS
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
542.76
13.01
98.64
.33
.98
10.57
4.22
6.49
3.24
13.00
6.50
15.26
715.00
53519
53519
53519
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
002534
002534
002534
CATERERS CAFE, THE
CATERERS CAFE, THE
CATERERS CAFE, THE
REFRESHMENTS FOR TREE LIGHTING
SALES TAX
REFRESHMENTS:TRAINING MEETING
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
001-162-999-5261
700.00
54.25
172.80
927.05
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/07/99 11:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOJNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53520 01/07/99 003047 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL OT CHOIR PERFORMANCE:11/28/98 280-199-999-5362
150.00
150.00
53521 01/07/99 003488
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL C
53522 01/07/99 003565 CHILI'S
OT CHOIR PERFORMANCE:12/05/98
EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON- JAN 7,1999
280-199-999-5362
001-150-999-5265
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 001-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 165-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 190-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 191-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 192-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 193-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 194-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 280-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 300-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 320-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 330-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 340-2380
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 001-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 165-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 190-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 191-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 192-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 193-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 194-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 280-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 300-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 320-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 330-2500
53523 01/07/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 340-2500
53525 01/07/99 002989 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA
COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC.
53526 01/07/99 002631
BLDG MAINTENANCE:CITY HALL
TRAFFIC COUNT PRGM:PALA RD
TRAFFIC COLLISION DATABASE
53527 01/07/99 002869 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE
53528 01/07/99 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT
340-199-701-5250
001-164-602-5406
001-164-602-5610
190-2140
150.00
764.50
1,235.28
37.20
205.16
.75
1.93
22.97
6.45
16.41
7.12
37.36
8,08
27.53
1,724.26
51.94
286.36
1.05
2.70
32.04
9.00
22.90
9.94
52.14
11.28
38.44
45.00
325.00
1,767.10
82.50
150.00
764.50
3,848.29
45.00
325.00
1,767.10
82.50
53529 01/07/99 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
53529 01/07/99 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
53530 01/07/99 DENTON, RONNA
53531 01/07/99 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
OCT PARKING CIT. PROCESSING
OCT PARKING CIT. PROCESSING
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
DEC 98 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE
001-140-999-5250
001-170-999-5250
190-2900
300-2180
127.75
127.75
100.00
452.74
255.50
100.00
452.74
53532 01/07/99 002922
53533 01/07/99 001714
53534 01/07/99 001380
DOUBLE D PIPELINE, INC,
DREAM ENGINEERINGf INC.
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
INSTALLATION SERVICES:PW97-06
PLAN CHECK REIMBURSEMENTS
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 DONAHOE
210-165-683-5804
210-190-155-5802
001-161-999-5118
1,600.00
8.80
2,809.50
1,600.00
8.80
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99 11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
53534 01/07/99 001380 E S
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 DONAHOE 001-161-999-5118 3,137.28
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 YONKER 001-140-999-5118 862.32
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 DEGANGE 001-161-999-5118 2,858.40
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/04 MCLEAN 280-199-999-5118 856.56
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 MCLEAN 280-199-999-5118 1,022.56
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/4 HILLBERG 165-199-999-5118 1,855.65
13,402.27
53535 01/07/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230 8.50
53535 01/07/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 22.75
53535 01/07/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 34.00
53535 01/07/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 12.50
53535 01/07/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 12.50
90.25
53536 01/07/99 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC PROF. CONSULTING SERVICES 001-140-999-5248 2,908.75
2,908.75
53537 C'1/07/99 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT:RAINBOW CREEK 165-199-813-5804 150.00
150,00
53538 01/07/99 003562 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE IN CLOSING COST ESCRW 74038A HILL 210-165-604-5700 1,741.00
1,741.00
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-4249-5288 SJ DEC 001-120-999-5260 53.32
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-4249-5288 SJ DEC 001-100-999-5250 124.70
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-4249-5288 SJ DEC 001-120-999-5258 589.02
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-4249-5288 SJ DEC 001-100-999-5260 54.20
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-3378-9913 GR DEC 001-140-999-5261 264.88
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-0803-1143 HP DEC 190-180-999-5260 118.41
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-0803-1143 HP DEC 190-183-999-5380 70.58
53539 01/07/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 5477-2590-0803-1143 HP DEC 190-180-999-5258 10.57-
1,264.54
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
53540 01/07/99 000170
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
DAY PLANNER KITS/REFILLS 001-163-999-5220 104.16
DAY PLANNER KITS/REFILLS 001-164-604-5220 416.64
FREIGHT 001-163-999-5220 2.83
FREIGHT 001-164-604-5220 11.31
SALES TAX 001-163-999-5220 8.29
SALES TAX 001-164-604-5220 33.17
DAY PLANNER KITS/REFILLS 001-163-999-5220 26.40
DAY PLANNER KITS/REFILLS 001-164-604-5220 105.60
FREIGHT 001-163-999-5220 .78
FREIGHT 001-164-604-5220 3.12
SALES TAX 001-163-999-5220 2.15
SALES TAX 001-164-604-5220 8.61
DAY PLANNER KITS/REFILLS 190-180-999-5220 179.55
902.61
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
53541 01/07/99 000184
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
909-506-2626:P.D.:DEC
909-506-6506:JS:DEC
909-676-3526:FIRE ALARM:DEC
909-693-0956:GENERAL USAGE:DEC
909-694-4356:HINTERGARDT PARK
909-694-8927:GENERAL USAGE/DEC
909-695-1178:MARG.COMM.PRK:DEC
001-170-999-5229 310.48
320-199-999-5208 164.20
320-199-999-5208 80.89
320-199-999-5208 72.04
320-199-999-5208 29.81
320-199-999-5208 26.91
320-199-999-5208 61.17
745.50
53542 01/07/99 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. DEC CONSULTING SERVICES 001-110-999-5248 500.00
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99 11:42
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
53542 01/07/99 000351
53543 01/07/99 000178
53544 01/07/99
53545 01/07/99 001550
53546 01/07/99 000520
53547 01/07/99 000194
53547 01/07/99 000194
53547 01/07/99 000194
53547 01/07/99 000194
53548 01/07/99 001351
53549 01/07/99 000199
53550 01/07/99 003537
53551 01/07/99 002695
53551 01/07/99 002695
53551 01/07/99 002695
53552 01/07/99
53553 01/07/99 003223
53554 01/07/99 002424
53555 01/07/99 003046
53556 01/07/99 002789
53557 01/07/99 000209
53558 01/07/99 001973
53559 01/07/99 002519
53559 01/07/99 002519
53560 01/07/99 002929
53561 01/07/99 001967
53562 01/07/99
53563 01/07/99 000843
53564 01/07/99 003448
VENDOR
NAME
GILLISS, MAX C.M.
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GONZALEZ, MINA
GROSSMONT BANK
H D L COREN & CONE, INC
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
J A G ENTERPRISES
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
JOKA ENTERPRISES
K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN
KELLEY DISPLAY, INC
KFROG 95.1
KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
M & M AIR CONDITIONING
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MASS CONFUSION SOFTBALL
MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
MELOOYS AD WORKS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DEC CONSULTING SERVICES
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
RETENTION-ESCROW ACCT:GENESIS
SALES TAX CALCULATION SERVICE
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:7/98-6/99
000199 IRS GARN
APPRAISAL -JEFFERSON AVE PROP
PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
BIOLOGICAL SERVICES-PALA RD BR
BANNER SUPPLIES/MAINTENANCE
OLD TOWN HOLIDAY ADVERTISING
TEMP HELP W/E 12/13 MUELLER
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR P.W,
PARKING LOT LIGHTING REPAIR
MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT
FREIGHT
RESIDENTIAL IMPROV PRGM:CHIVRA
TEMP HELP W/E 12/20/98 BELIAN
REFUND: FIELD RENTAL
NOV SVS:PALA RD BRIDGE DESIGN
OLD TOWN PROMOTION SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-604-5248
320-199-999-5221
190-2900
210-1035
261-199-999-5250
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
280-2080
001-111-999-5264
001-2140
280-199-999-5250
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
190-2900
210-165-631-5801
280-199-999-5271
280-199-999-5362
001-140-999-5118
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
165-199-813-5804
001-162-999-5118
190-183-4988
210-165-631-5802
280-199-999-5362
ITEM
AMOUNT
500.00
537.97
100.00
30,859.70
2,500.00
1,537.66
18.76
184.00
31.44
10,775.00
275.27
3,000.00
762.40
353.34
135.72
100.00
963.78
149.73
999.00
280.80
37.01
180.95
148.50
12.43
1,225.00
435.38
300.00
7,907.38
143.93
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,000.00
537.97
100.00
30,859.70
2,500.00
1,771.86
10,775.00
275.27
3,000.00
1,251.46
100.00
963.78
149.73
999.00
280.80
37.01
180.95
160.93
1,225.00
435.38
300.00
7,907.38
143.93
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53565
53565
53565
53565
53565
53565
53565
53565
53566
53566
53566
53567
53567
53567
53567
53567
53567
53567
53567
53567
53568
53568
53569
53569
53570
53570
53570
53570
53570
53570
53571
53571
53571
53571
53571
53571
53571
53572
53573
53574
CHECK
DATE
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003076
003241
003241
003241
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
002497
002497
003523
003523
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
002105
002105
002105
002105
002105
002105
002105
002256
002406
002331
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP
MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I
MILLAR HEATING & AIR# I
MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
HISCO
MISCO
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION R
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION R
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINT]NG SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN T]RE& SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
P & D CONSULTANTS, INC
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PEP BOYS INC
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
COBRA/FLAMMER/GREEK/NELSON
INSTALL HEAT PUMP @ CITY HALL
CITY HALL HVAC REPAIRS
CRC AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS
CITY STATIONERY FOR PW DEPT
CITY STATIONERY FOR PW DEPT
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:JERRY GONZALES
SALES TAX
3000 CITY ENVELOPES
QTY 5000 #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES
SALES TAX
SONY IOOPK DISKETTES
FREIGHT
PORTABLE TOILETS FOR HOLIDAY
ADA HANDICAPPED TOILET
W2 FORMS FOR PAYROLL
W2 MAILING ENVELOPES FOR P/R
1099 MISC FORMS FOR A/P
1099 MISC MAILING ENVELOPES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
TEMP INSPECTOR HELP P/E 11/27
FURNITURE FOR INSPECTORS
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
280-2340
300-2340
340-2340
001-1180
340-199-701-5215
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
001-163-999-5222
001-164-604-5222
001-163-999-5222
001-164-604-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-161-999-5220
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-164-601-5214
001-165-999-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-162-999-5118
210-190-158-5804
001-164-601-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,648.97
103.83
287.81
21.39
62.29
20.76
83,06
196.13
1,100.00
135.00
187.00
207,46
207.45
16.08
16.08
38.25
2.96
285.79
257.49
19.96
75.80
18.76
490.71
74.22
83.57
33.35
42.90
22.00
10.00
14.09
157,39
119.90
552.80
64.96
50.00
398.90
160.58
4,320.00
99.43
38.42
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,424.24
1,422.00
1,051.52
94.56
564.93
205.91
1,504.53
4,320.00
99.43
38.42
53575 01/07/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 100.79
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53575
53576
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
001958
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958
AETNA SO
BLSHIELD
BLSHIELD
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
KAISERSO
PACIFICR
PACIFICR
PACIFICR
PERS CHO
PERS REV
AETNA SO
AETNA SO
AETNA SO
BLSHIELD
BLSHIELD
BLSHIELD
CIGNA
CIGNA
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
KAISER
~AISER
PACIFICR
PACIFICR
PACIFICR
PC
PERS CHO
PERS DED
PERS-ADM
PERS L-T
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
300-2090
001-2090
190-2090
191-2090
192-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2122
33.59
3.48
52.07
377.93
38.88
13.35
18.90
152.56
33.90
1.78
117.47
944.70 -
459.36
215.65
71.89
1,190.40
370.65
3.57
871.91
40.84
6,315.73
823.90
16.44
54.32
431.58
263.07
3.83
164.41
870.15
2,618.81
164.83
3,664.44
802.89
19.73
16.00
2,355.16
1,134.12
117.40
73.84
23,061.08
73.84
53577
53577
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
002498
002498
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC
PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
AUG SVS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 IMPRVM
AUG SVS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 IMPRVM
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
210-165-601-5801
210-165-601-5804
001-161-999-5224
190-181-999-5301
190-181-999-5301
001-171-999-5220
001-140-999-5261
001-140-999-5261
001-162-999-5260
14,789.43
4,334.32
5.50
24.75
40.69
9.92
20.00
22.75
4O.00
19,123.75
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
1~:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53578
53579
53579
53579
53579
53580
53580
53580
53580
53581
53582
53583
53583
53583
53583
53583
53583
53583
53583
53584
53584
53585
53586
53587
53588
53588
53589
53590
53591
53592
CHECK
DATE
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
0!/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000254
000254
000254
000254
002776
002776
002776
002776
003386
000260
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000947
000262
000262
003504
000418
000418
000406
000406
002709
003566
003277
VENDOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRIME MATRIX, INC.
PRIME MATRIX, INC.
PRIME MATRIX, INC.
PRIME MATRIX, INC.
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ASSOC
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
REYNOLDS, VIRGINIA
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
ROGER PITKIN LANDSCAPE
ROSEBUD RANCH
S T A ENGINEERING, INC,
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0472
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0397
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0469
PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0318
SC-5001339-0 KL
SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN
SC-5001377-0 SR VAN
SC-5003948-6 INFO SYSTEM
SURVEY SVS:LIBRARY PROJECT
SELF INK DATE STAMP W/PADS
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES
01-99-02003-0 FLOATING METER
02-79-10100-1N.W. SPORTS
REIMB CITY BUSINESS PHONE USAG
RE-ISSUE:EXEMPT NOTICE PW97-06
APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES
BIKE PATROL - OCTOBER 1998
BIKE PATROL - NOVEMBER 1998
LEAGUE MTG:1/11/99:SF,JS,RR
GARDEN SVS:CORTE CHRISTINA
REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE FEE
TRAFFIC DESIGN SVS:JEFF/WINCN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
280-199-999-5220
190-180-999-5260
001-150-999-5265
001-162-999-5220
190-180-999-5301
001-150-999-5265
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-100-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
210-199-129-5802
001-140-999-5220
001-164-604-5268
001-163-999-5268
210-190-143-5804
210-165-683-5804
210-165-696-5804
210-165-696-5804
280-199-824-5804
001-162-999-5220
001-164-601-5250
190-180-999-5240
280-199-999-5362
210-165-683-5802
001-163-999-5250
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5326
001-100-999-5260
165-199-999-5250
001-199-4056
001-164-602-5406
ITEM
AMOUNT
9.70
21.00
3.77
21.36
4.19
15.25
8.07
44.79
6.00
18.25
17.00
18.75
57.45
28.00
37.90
37.58
2,833.33
56.30
53.88
26.59
9.68
703.40
653.95
461.02
12.09
49.67
128.57
61.29
28.44
78.00
6.50
267.20
3,555.15
75.00
12.50
35.00
1,800.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
291.74
60.00
160.93
2,833.33
56.30
1,970.28
189.86
28.44
78.00
6.50
3,822.35
75.00
12.50
35.00
1,800.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/07/99 11:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53593 01/07/99 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA TEM ELEM SCHOOL POOL MAINT 190-180-999-5212
151.00
151.00
53594 01/07/99 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI SKATE PARK EQUIPMENT 190-183-999-5305 151.38
151.38
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-11-007-0455 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 301.62
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-747-1393 MONROE PED 190-199-999-5240 44.03
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-14-204-1615 FRONT ST RDIO 340-199-701-5240 18.79
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-15-830-2307 FRONT ST 190-199-999-5240 49.95
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-4946 SIXTH ST 190-181-999-5240 679.31
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 4,019.34
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240 16,802.37
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 193-180-999-5240 1,922.35
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5240 27.21
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-502-8077 VARIOUS METERS 340-199-702-5240 469.54
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-18-017-8972 MARGARITA TC1 191-180-999-5319 298.48
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59-77-416-2309-01MARGARITA SP 190-180-999-5240 1,137.29
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 65-77-804-6630-01RDBW CYN TC1 191-180-999-5319 105.90
53595 01/07/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 67-77-863-1535-91 VARIOUS METE 190-180-999-5240 2,607.37
28,483.55
53596 01/07/99 003495 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI INSTALL ELECT SVS @ DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 10,271.76 10,271.76
53597 01/07/99 003247 SPANOS CORPORATION, THE REIMB AGRMNT:MARGARITA RD WIDE 210-165-681-5804
53597 01/07/99 003247 SPANOS CORPORATION, THE RETENTION W/H INV 155-0110-01 210-2035
504,782.81
50,478.28- 454,304.53
53598 01/07/99 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET C CARPET CLEANING @ CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
50.00 50.00
53599 01/07/99 000574 SUPERTONER HP LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5215 536.67
536.67
53600 01/07/99 003311 SWAINS ELECTRIC MOTOR S WATER HEATER CIRCULATION MOTOR 190-182-999-5212 211.75
53600 01/07/99 003311 SWAINS ELECTRIC MOTOR S FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 7.00
53600 01/07/99 003311 SWAINS ELECTRIC MOTOR S SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 16.95
235.70
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 533.00
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 1.03
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 14.35
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 3.07
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 20.50
53601 01/07/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 20.50
676.50
53602 01/07/99 003442 TEMECULA BUILDING COMPA FACADE IMPROV PRGM:MUSICIAN'S 280-199-813-5804 2,630.02
53603 01/07/99 001035 TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL JULY-DEC SOLID WASTE COLLECTIN 194-180-999-5315 1,115,729.64
53604 01/07/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 165.78
53604 01/07/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL CENTERPIECE DONATION 190-183-999-5370 32.33
2,630.02
1,115,729.64
198.11
53605 01/07/99 TEMECULA PLAY AND LEARN REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100,00
100.00
53606 01/07/99 003265 TEMECULA SWIM CLUB 98-99 COMM SERVICE FUNDING PGM 001-101-999-5267 2,000.00 2,000.00
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
11:42
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53607
53607
53607
53607
53607
53607
53607
53607
53607
53608
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
001022
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
lyr SUBSCRIPT:ADA COMPLIANCE
001-1020
165-1020
190-1020
330-1020
193-1020
280-1020
300-1020
320-1020
340-1020
001-165-999-5228
3,013.68
290.00
529.65
80.00
1.00
190.00
10.00
350.00
5.00
346.00
4,469.33
346.00
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
53609
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. O02107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107
VL REVER
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VL ADVAN
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
VOL LIFE
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
192-2510
193-2510
194-2510
340-2510
001-2510
001-2510
190-2510
192-2510
193-2510
194-2510
340-2510
181.40-
163.60
7.68
.34
1.70
3.40
4.68
181.40
163.60
7.67
.35
1.70
3.40
4.68
362.80
53610
53610
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53611
53612
53612
53613
53613
53613
53613
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
000420
000420
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003560
003542
003542
000459
000459
000459
000459
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PAC[FIC CONSULTAN
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRANSAMERICA
TRINITECH MARKETING DIR
TRINITECH MARKETING DIR
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G
TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G
NOV SVS:OVRLND DR & MARGARITA
NOV SVS:OVRLND DR & MARAGRITA
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
003560 AD&D
OMNI ANALYZER KIT
FREIGHT
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
210-165-681-5802
210-165-681-5802
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
320-199-999-5242
320-199-909-5242
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
259.06
4,467.34
125.26
3.01
22.76
.08
.23
2.45
.97
1.49
.74
3.O0
1.50
3.51
899.00
20.OO
588.80
280.00
320.00
552.00
4,726.40
165.00
919.00
1,740.80
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/07/99 11:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080
53614 01/07/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080
10,769.41
210.23
1,359.17
2.49
33.18
25.00
85.23
83.34
666.66
158.34
13,393.05
53615 01/07/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160
53615 01/07/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160
53615 01/07/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160
53615 01/07/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 330-2160
53615 01/07/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160
488.60
10.24
434.86
37.32
70.08
1,041.10
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-110-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-120-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-162-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 190-180-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-170-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 280-199-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-140-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-150-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-161-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-164-604-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 320-199-999-5230
53616 01/07/99 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-171-999-5230
3.00
104.06
189.72
70.18
158.73
8.00
31.10
731.32
36.78
406.94
1,248.39
20.67
.55
3,009.44
53617 0~/07/99 003331 UNION BNK OF CA FBO:VLL RELEASE RET FOR INV # 430989 280-1035
32,591.56 32,591.56
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120
53618 01/07/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120
239.45
3.76
20.00
1.54
.25
4.00
5.00
2.00
276.00
53619 01/07/99 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, NOV PRGSS:OLD TWN STREETSCAPE 280-199-824-5804
53619 01/07/99 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, NOV PRGSS:OLD TWN STREETSCAPE 280-199-824-5804
53619 01/07/99 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, RETENTION W/H ON INVOICE 43989 280-2035
53620 01/07/99 002886 VEHICLE REGISTRATION CO 002886 DMV FEES 001-2140
532,249.42
119,581.78
32,591.56-
109.15
619,239.64
109.15
53621 01/07/99 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 181.43
53621 01/07/99 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 126.14 307.57
VOUCHRE2
01/07/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53622
53623
11:42
CHECK
DATE
01/07/99
01/07/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002109
001601
VENDOR
NAME
WHITE CAP
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW CREW
NOV SVS:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5218
001-164-602-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
66.95
2,818.64
PAGE 11
CHECK
AMOUNT
66.95
2,818.64
TOTAL CHECKS 2,471,171.37
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
11:34
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 ~UPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
AMOUNT
85,170.74
5,307.18
21,608.27
29.56
73.49
3,389.96
232.73
19,455.27
16,941.48
16,567.03
1,293.90
4,698.31
14,423.64
2,116.33
1,250.00
TOTA~ 192,557.89
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32318
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
32529
53626
53626
53627
53627
53627
53628
11:34
CHECK
DATE
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
0~/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/c~9
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01y13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/13/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
'000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
003304
003304
001323
001323
001323
003564
VENDOR
NAME
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS}
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC.
ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
BAILEYS WINE COUNTRY CA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
JAN BILLBOARD ADVERTISING:O.T.
BILLBOARD AD:O.T.ROD RUN
DEC DRINKING WATER:CITY HALL
DEC DRINKING WATER:MAINT.FAC.
DEC DRINKING WATER FOR CRC
REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG:12/15
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
340-199-701-5250
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
001-100-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
16,727.21
411.26
3,215.26
8.70
22.03
293.86
72.41
161.85
39.92
601.11
115.26
480.35
4,430.86
117.18
883.69
2.44
6.18
76.17
20.57
54.88
24.18
123.82
42.72
125.31
27.57
.68
28.97
2.49
4.67
4,265.90
142.15
692.87
1.47
3.52
55.37
10.22
57.52
12.45
138.30
24.38
89.80
1,700.00
400.00
184.91
57.32
28.61
100.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
28,057.22
5,558.33
2,100.00
270.84
100.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/14/99 11:34 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53629 G1/14/99 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
117.60
117.60
53630 01/14/99 003569 BOWNE OF LOS ANGELES O/S PRINTING - CFD 88-12 261-199-999-5250
53631 01/14/99 000696 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EXPLORER POST RE-CHARTER FEE 001-171-999-5235
16,941.48
118.00
16,941.48
118.00
53632 01/14/99 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES JAN RESTROOM/FACILITY RENT 280-199-999-5234
826.00
826.00
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 . 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53633 01/14/99 000128
53634 01/14/99 001159
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND:THORNHILL
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
DECEMBER 98 WORKERS' COMP
FINGERPRINT PROCESSING:NW EMPY
300-199-999-5200
001-2370
165-2370
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
194-2370
280-2370
306-2370
320-2370
330-2370
340-2370
190-181-999-5112
001-150-999-5250
350.00
3,734.63
81.60
1,151.74
.80
2.06
49.38
6.92
30.98
7.87
52.03
18.32
300.29
1.53
210.00
5,788.15
210.00
53635 01/14/99 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. PETCH - 2/08/96
300-199-999-5205
728.50
728.50
53636 01/14/99 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS
53636 01/14/99 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
001-164-601-5218
190-183-999-5370
3.20
45.26
48.46
53637 01/14/99 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
53637 01/14/99 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
53638 01/14/99 DENNY'S
53639 01/14/99 003006
53639 01/14/99 003006
53640 01/14/99 003068
53641 01/14/99 002466
53642 01/14/99
'001714
DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING
DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING
DILLON CONSULTING ENGIN
DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY
DREAM ENGINEERING, INC.
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
OCT-NOV PARKING CIT.PROCESSING
OCT-NOV PARKING CIT.PROCESSING
MEALS FOR FIRE CREWS:01/09/99
RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:TINSLEY
RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:S.BULA
CONSULT MECH. SMOKE CTRL SYS
JAN ELEVATOR SERVICE/MAINT.
PROF. DESIGN SERVICES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 WILLIAM
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 WILLIAM
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 MILES
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/04 MYERS
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 MYERS
001-140-999-5250
001-170-999-5250
001-110-999-5278
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
001-162-999-5248
340-199-701-5212
210-190-155-5802
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
196.00
196.00
225.90
1,250.00
900.00
1,012.50
202.00
1,512.50
548.13
548.13
293.60
293.60
293.60
1,891.80
1,891.80
392.00
225.90
2,150.00
1,012.50
202.00
1,512.50
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99 11:34
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 -001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
53643 01/14/99 001380 E S
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT BERVIC
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/18 HILLBER 165-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E12/18 SERVEN 190-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E12/18 SERVEN 193-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E12/18 SERVEN O01-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 01/01SERVEN 190-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 01/01SERVEN 193-
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 01/01SERVEN 001-
199-999-5118
180-999-5118
180-999-5118
164-603-5118
180-999-5118
180-999-5118
164-603-5118
1,708.80
373.60
747.20
373.60
366.60
733.19
366.59
10,430.24
53644 01/14/99 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIEGO DR LDSC WATER SERVICES 193-180-999-5240
261.98
261.98
53645 01/14/99 002712 ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN DEC ECONOMIC CONSULTING SVCS 001-111-999-5248
1,000.00
1,000.00
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:RIVERTON 193-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:RIVERTON 193-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:HNTRGRDT 190-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/9~ 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE VARIOUS PARK SITES-iRRiGATION 190-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:SPRTS PK 190-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:SiGNET 193-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUL-NOV LANDSCAPE SERVICES 190-199-999-5415
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INSTALL DRAIN LINE:SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5415
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSC MAINTENANCE:VAR.LOCATIONS 193-180-999-5212
53646 01/14/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:SPRTS PK 190-180-999-5415
53.60
33.60
99.09
163.66
30.89
143.49
530.00
750.00
165.00
960.00
2,929.33
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 '000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
53647 01/14/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 330-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5277
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230
INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
15.25
12.75
17.25
61.50
27.25
15.50
9.70
46.50
61.75
81.00
81.50
10.75
12.50
20.50
48.00
521.70
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
53648 01/14/99 000170
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-110-999-5220
DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-150-999-5220
DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-100-999-5220
SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-110-999-5220
SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-150-999-5220
SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-100-999-5220
SALES TAX 001-110-999-5220
SALES TAX 001-150-999-5220
SALES TAX 001-100-999-5220
19.46
19.76
11.98
2.00
2.00
2.O0
1.69
1.71
1.03
61.63
53649 01/14/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-308-1079:GENERAL USAGE:DEC 320-199-999-5208 55.45
53649 01/14/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-1409:GENERAL USAGE:DEC 320-199-999-5208 97.31
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99 11:34
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
53649 01/14/99 000184
53649 01/14/99 000184
53650 01/14/9t) 002141
53651 01/14/99 000351
53652 01/14/99 000177
53652 01/14/99 000177
53652 01/14/99 000177
53652 01/14/99 000177
53653 01/14/99 000192
53653 01/14/99 000192
53653 01/14/99 000192
53654 01/14/99 · 000178
53655 01/14/99 001550
53656 01/14/99 001697
53657 01/14/99 000186
53657 01/14/99 000186
53657 01/14/99 000186
53657 01/14/99 000186
53657 01/14/99 000186
53657 01/14/9~ 000186
53658 01/14/99 002372
53659 01/14/99 003190
53660 01/14/99 003190
53661 01/14/99 000388
53662 01/14/99
53663 01/14/99 001429
53664 01/14/99 ' 000198
53665 01/14/99 000198
53665 01/14/99 000198
53666 01/14/99 002695
53667 01/14/99 000203
53668 01/14/99 001091
VENDOR
NAME
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GEIS, PAUL
GILLISS, MAX C.M.
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GROSSMONT BANK
HALL, NANCY LEE
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC,
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HARMON, JUDY
HEMET/TEM. EMPLOYER ADV
HEMET/TEM. EMPLOYER ADV
I C B O, INC.
IN AND OUT BURGER
INACOM INFORMATION SYST
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
909-695-3539:GENERAL USAGE:DEC
909-699-0590:ALARM PTA:DEC
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR:TEM.POLICE
PROF.SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE
OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK
OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK
OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK
OFFICE SUPPLIES:COPY ROOM
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
RETENTION:ESCROW ACCT:GENESIS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-MAINT.FAC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
LABOR/EMPLOY.LAW:YATES/BALLANC
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:HR
BLDG CODE BOOKS:MBSHP:WINDSOR
MEALS FOR FIRE CREWS:01/09/99
NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES
MB:G.THORNHILL:1/31/99-1/31/O0
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:SN/RR/JS
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:SN/RR/JS
PLAN CHECK SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT ADS FOR HR
ECONOMIC CONSULTING SERVICES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5214
210-165-631-5801
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5242
330-199-999-5220
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
32~-199-999-5221
210-1035
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5301
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-183-999-5330
001-150-999-5260
001-150-999-5226
001-171-999-5228
001-110-999-5278
320-199-999-5248
001-161-999-5226
001-110-999-5226
001-100-999-5226
001-162-999-5248
001-150-999-5254
280-199-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
35.35
55.93
190.00
5,000.00
231.20
39.80
95.49
83.79
109.90
8.57
8.92
25.70
556.52
204.80
53.87
128.24
575.43
476.05
224.96
35.50
459.60
24.00
20.00
1,692.84
191.77
1,215.00
75.00
250.00
150.00
320.88
64.40
1,105.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
244.04
190.00
5,000.00
450.28
127.39
25.70
556.52
204.80
1,494.05
459.60
24.00
20.00
1,692.84
191.77
1,215.00
75.00
400.00
320.88
64.40
1,105.00
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99 11:34
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
KOOL SOUNDS
LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE
001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
001689 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC,
MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY,
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY,
NILLAR HEATING & AIR, I
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI
MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI
MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI
MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PARKS~ RONALD J.
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
53669 01/14/99 003361
53670 01/14/99 002512
53671 01/14/99
53672 01/14/99
53673 01/14/99
53674 01/14/99 002664
53674 01/14/99 002664
53675 01/14/99 000220
53675 01/14/99 000220
53676 01/14/99 000944
53676 01/14/~9 000944
53677 01/14/99 003241
53678 01/14/99
53678 01/14/99
53678 01/14/99
53678 01/14/99
53678 01/14/99
53679 01/14/99 000973
53680 01/14/99 002257
53680 01/14/99 ' 002257
53680 01/14/99 002257
53681 01/14/99 000230
53682 01/14/99 000845
53683 01/14/99 003458
53684 01/14/99 001584
53684 01/14/99 001584
53684 01/14/9-9 001584
53685 01/14/99 002088
53686 01/14/99 002406
53686 01/14/99 002406
53687 01/14/99 000525
53688 01/14/99 000246
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DEPOSIT FOR DJ SVCS:XMAS '99
PINS FOR RECOGNITION PROGRAM
CAPPO CF:VOLLMUTH:1/18-22/99
REL RETENTION PRJT: PW96-18
TEMP HELP W/E 12/13 BELIAN
PREVENTITIVE MAINT ON TRACTOR
PREVENTITIVE MAINT ON TRACTOR
PRINTING OF TRAFFIC NEWSLETTER
SALES TAX
CONTROLLER TESTER
SALES TAX
TCC HEATING UNIT REPAIRS
FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:MAYOR FORD
BUSINESS CARDS:PRO-TEM STONE
SALES TAX
FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:HOLMES,T
SALES TAX
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES:PARKS
CONTROL VALVE CARTRIDGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
ARBITRAGE REBATE SVS:TCSD
CITY'S MEMBERSHIP 3/99 - 2/00
PALOMA DEL SOL PRK:LOT REPAIRS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TYPEWRITER REPAIRS-PLANNING
FURNITURE FOR CITY MAINT YARD
FURNITURE FOR CITY MAINT YARD
EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCH PRGM
000246 MLT PERS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5265
001-150-999-5265
001-140-999-5261
210-2035
001-162-999-5118
190-182-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
001-110-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-164-602-5610
001-164-602-5610
190-184-999-5250
001-100-999-5222
001-100-999-5222
001-100-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
390-199-999-5248
001-100-999-5226
190-180-999-5212
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-161-999-5217
210-190-158-5804
210-190-158-5804
001-1175
001-2130
ITEM
AMOUNT
150.00
1,131.37
118,00
8,886.85
435,38
83.75
100.00
2,931.00
227.15
1,688.00
130.82
241.00
102.50
102.50
15.89
102.50
7.94
378.15
108.00
5.00
8.37
1,250.00
2,381.00
2,945.00
2,130.51
27.00
165.11
130.00
3,403.38
96.02
1,589.22
322.43
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
150.00
1,131.37
118.00
8,886.85
435.38
183.75
3,158.15
1,818.82
241.00
331.33
378.15
121.37
1,250.00
2,381.00
2,945.00
2,322.62
130.00
3,499.40
1,589.22
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/14/99 11:34 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130
53688 01/14/99. 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
53688 01/14/~9 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
53688 01/14/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390
11.13
23,203.03
693.64
3.01
3,739.84
13.28
33.95
406.27
113.58
.90
301.77
130.52
657.78
142.40
505.76
100.64
2.82
5.61
39.34
8.42
81.01
1.87
14.11
.05
.14
1.51
.61
.92
.46
1,86
.93
2.18
30,541.77
53690 01/14/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADS:PLANNER/JANITO 001-150-999-5254
53690 01/14/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0237 001-120-999-5256
53690 01/14/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PW98~10 001-120-999-5256
465.35
20,00
66,27
551.62
53691 01/14/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5238
268.88
268.88
53692 01/14/99 000981 R H F INC.
RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT 001-170-999-5215
113.77
113.77
53693 01/14/99 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB TESTING BACKFLOW DEVICE-PARKS 190-180-999-5212
53693 01/14/99 '000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB TESTING BACKFLOW DEVICE-PARKS 193-180-999-5212
600.00
330.00
930.00
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-55015-0 FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST 280-199-807-5801
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98000-0 PAUBA RD-DC 001-171-999-5240
53694 01/14/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98010-0 PAUBA RD 001-171-999-5240
30.99
36.50
43.24
49.28
12.03
120.22
292.26
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/14/99 11:34 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-999-5214
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-999-5263
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-165-999-5214
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5214
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5263
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 00~-163-999-5214
53695 01/14/99 ' 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-164-604-5214
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214
53695 01/14/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5263
18.00
9.51
6.00
12.00
15.67
29.00
26.00
46.95
32.75
195.88
53696 01/14/99 000266 RIGHTWAY
JAN-RIVERTON PRK TOILET RENTAL 190-180-999-5238
62.89
62.89
53697 01/14/99 000268 RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT TRANSFER OF DEC K-RAT FUNDS 001-2300
53698 01/14/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION DEC PRGSS:WINCH/I-15 BRIDGE 280-199-602-5804
53698 01/14/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION W/H INV 981208 280-2035
1,250.00
916.30
45.82-
1,250.00
870.48
53699 01/14/99 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H.
TRVL EXP:NAT'L LEAGUE:12/1-6 001-100-999-5258
69.03
69.03
53700 01/14/99 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA JAN TEM ELEM SCHOOL POOL MAINT 190-180-999-5212
220.00
220.00
53701 01/14/99 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY OPERATING PRMT FEE-DIESEL GENE 001-171-999-5212
175.60
175.60
53702 01/14/99 003375 TAYLOR, BEA
REIMBURSE EXPENSES FOR NOV/DEC 280-1240
100.00
100,00
53703 01/14/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES-CRC 190-182-999-5212
53703 01/14/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SVCS. - VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212
47.00
47.00
94.00
53704 01/14/99 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT TROPHIES 190-183-999-5380
58.02
58.02
53705 01/14/99. TEMECULA VALLEY BANK COUNICL TICKETS:BRADLEY PARTY 00~-100-999-5260
53706 01/14/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
53706 01/14/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
53706 01/14/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
53706 01/14/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
110.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
60.00
110.00
420.00
53707 01/14/99 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIG SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212
338.95
338.95
53708 01/14/99 003539 TOP GUN PAINTING
FACADE IMPROV PRGM:RANCON BLDG 280-199-B13-5804
788.45
788.45
53709 01/14/99 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES-B&S
001-162-999-5220
173.27
173.27
53710 01/14/99 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO 2QTR FY 98/99 EMERG REPONSE 001-171-999-5274
53711 01/14/99 002396 U S LONG DISTANCE, INC. LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER 320-199-999-5208
53712 01/14/99 002065 UNISOURCE 8 1/2 X 11 WHITE COPY PAPER 330-199-999-5220
53712 01/14/99 002065 UNISOURCE SALES TAX 330-199-999-5220
53713 01/14/99 003261 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, REL DEPOSIT W/H FOR CERT P/R 280-199-824-5804
1,312.50
1,511.28
2,364,00
183.21
10,000.00
1,312.50
1,511.28
2,547.21
10,000.00
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
11:34
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53715
53716
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
53717
CHECK
DATE
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
01/14/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003551
002109
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
· 000345
VENDOR
NAHE
WASHINGTON PROOUCTIONS
WHITE CAP
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILL1
XEROX CORPORATION BILL1
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DO RIGHT VIDEO - LOU HOLTZ
MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW CREW
NOV BASE CHRG-FIERY 200
LEASE & USAGE CHRG-5343 COPIER
SUPPLIES & MAINT STN 84 COPIER
DEC 98-XEROX 5012 COPIER USAGE
DEC 98-5765 COLOR COPIER USAGE
DEC LEASE PMT-TCC COPIER
DEC LEASE PMT-5100A COPIER
DEC INTEREST PMT-5100A COPIER
POOLED MAINT/SUPPLIES COPIERS
POOLED MAINT/SUPPLIES COPIERS
POOLED MAINT/SUPPLIES COPIERS
POOLED MAINT/SUPPLIES COPIERS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5261
001-164-601-5218
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5217
001-171-999-5217
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5239
190-184-999-5239
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
190-184-999-5239
330-199-999-5217
190-184-999-5239
ITEM
AMOUNT
604.00
42,27
110.00
242.77
693.00
62.50
55.06
67.08
1,712.83
407.20
4,420.14
114.00
4,420.14
114,00
CHECK
AMOUNT
604.00
42.27
12,418.72
TOTAL CHECKS 192,557.89
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
13:02
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 ]NFORMATION SYSTEMS
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
59,601.73
34,648.48
1,150.00
22,188.00
338,825.04
10,000.00
70,693.38
5,977.62
541.00
TOTAL- 543,625.25
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
13:02
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
53720
53720
53720
53721
53722
53722
53722
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53723
53724
53725
53725
53725
53726
53727
53728
53729
53730
53730
53730
53731
53732
53733
53734
53734
53734
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/~9
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
002896
002896
002896
003518
003150
003150
003150
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
.001056
001056
001056
001550
001429
001429
001429
002695
001091
000230
002256
000472
000472
000472
003499
000406
000357
002181
002181
002181
ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTI
ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTI
ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCT[
ARB, INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EDGE DEVELOPMENT, INC
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
GROSSMONT BANK
INACOM INFORMATION SYST
INACOM INFORMATION SYST
INACOM INFORMATION SYST
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOC[AT
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
P & D CONSULTANTS, INC
PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI
PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI
PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI
PETER VAN GAALE & SONS
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
PRG PMT#1:WINCHESTER SIDEWALK 210-165-695-5804
C/O #1PMT:WINCHESTER SIDEWALK 210-165-695-5804
RETENTION W/H PMT#1:WINCHESTER 210-2035
PROF.SVC:OVERLAND DR OVERCROSS 210-165-604-5804
C/O #4 PMT:MARGARITA COMM.PARK
PRG PMT~9:MARGARITA COMM. PARK
RETENTION W/H PMT ~9:MARGARITA
210-190-119-5804
210-190-119-5804
210-2035
DEC LDSC MAINT:NBRHOOD PARKS
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:N.SLOPES
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:STSCAPE
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:S.SLOPES
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:MEDIANS
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:PARKS
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:SR CTR
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:CRC
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:TCC
DEC lDSC MA[NTENANCE:C.HALL
DEC LDSC MA[NTENANCE:OT PRK LT
DEC LDSC MAINTENANCE:FIRE #84
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-199-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
19q-184-999-5415
340-199-701-5415
001-164-603-5415
001-171-999-5212
RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT:EDGE 210-1035
66,450.00
3,890.00
7,034.00-
17,280.00
1,222.10
27,334.34
2,855.66-
8,961.00
8,813.00
106.00
13,375.00
1,150.00
18,578.00
361.00
1,444.00
193.00
541.00
250.00
400.00
2,855.66
QTY 3 - NOTEBOOK PC 320-1970 5,535.00
FREIGHT 320-1970 12.67
SALES TAX 320-1970 429.95
BLDG INSPECTOR SVC:OLSEN/CLARK 001-162-999-5118
NOV PROF. CONSULTING SERVICES 001-111-999-5248
JAN-MAR 99 SPECIAL DIST ADMIN 190-180-999-5370
TEMP INSPECTOR 12/31 HENDERSON 001-162-999-5118
310-1910
310-1910
310-1910
FULL SIZE 4 W/D P/U TRUCK:PW
FULL SIZE 4 ~/D P/U TRUCK:PW
FULL SIZE 4 ~/E P/U TRUCK:P~
FACADE IMPROV PRGM:WEBSTER,D. 280-199-813-5804
00t-170-999-5273
NOVEMBER 98 BOOKING FEES
3RD QTR SERVS LEVEL FY 98/99 001-164-602-5405
210-165-601-5804
210-165-601-5804
210-2035
DEC PRGSS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 C011
DEC PRGSS:RANCHO CAL/I-15 IMPR
RETENTION W/H [NV 981203
9,279.50
10,908.03
5,005.48
7,920.00
23,564.46
23,564.46
23,564.46
10,000.00
9,163.20
21,681.00
32,899.71
168,196.89
20,109.66-
63,306.00
17,280.00
25,700.78
54,172.00
2,855.66
5,977.62
9,279.50
10,908.03
5,005.48
7,920.00
70,693.38
10,000.00
9,163.20
21,681.00
180,986.94
VOUCHRE2
01/14/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
53735
53736
13:02
CHECK
DATE
01/26/99
01/26/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003282
003545
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION-
THINK JACOBSON & ROTH
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ESCROW RANCHO/I-15 PRJT 981203
PRELIMINARY MUSEUM PLANNING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-1035
210-190-808-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
20,109.66
28,586.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
20,109.66
28,586.00
TOTAL CHECKS 543,625.25
ITEM 4
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
January 26, 1999
Mystic Lake
Prepared by:
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to send a letter of support for the acquisition of
property for the expansion of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area.
BACKGROUND: On December 7, 1998 the City received a letter from Mr. Cad Davis requesting
the City support efforts to acquire lands for the expansion of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area. The
property in question is located in the northern San Jacinto Valley. The Wildlife Area is public land
under the ownership and management of the Califomia Department of Fish and Game. Through the
acquisition of additional lands, it is the intent to preserve natural wetlands, which support many
species of plants, animals and waterfowl.
SPECIFIC ACTION: Prepare a letter of support to assist in the acquisition of lands for the
expansion of the San Jacinto Wildlife.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments:
Letter from Senator Barbara Boxer - Page 2
Exhibits - Page 3
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Mystic Lake CC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LETTER FROM SENATOR BARBARA BOXER
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Mystic Lake CC.doc
2
BARBARA BOXER
CALIFORNIA
tanitcd
HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
SUITE 112
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-0505
(202) 224-3553
senator@boxer,senate.gov
http://www.senate.gov/~boxer
COMMITTEES:
APPROPRIATIONS
BANKING, HOUSING, AND
URBAN AFFAIRS
BUDGET
ENVIRONMENT
AND PUBLIC WORKS
July 31, 1998
Daniel E. Olson
Attorney at Law
3974 Jurupa Avenue, #301
Riverside, CA 92506
Dear Mr. Olson:
Thank you for your recent letter regarding property contiguous to the
San Jacinto Wildlife Area near Mystic Lake. Earlier this year, I had the
opportunity to travel near Mystic Lake and was interested in its history and
current circumstance.
There is the possibility that a purchase of property near the San Jacinto
Wildlife Area could be made with federal funds, likely through the Land and
Water Conservation Fund. Early next year, I will be making recommendations
for funding through the Senate Committee on Appropriations. I would be
happy to consider a recommendation for this general area at that time. If there
is still an interest in the sale of the property, I suggest that in December you
contact Leannah Bradley at my San Bemardino office to discuss this matter.
e~, your letter.
Thank you again
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
BB :lrb
[] 1700 MONTGOMERY STREET
SUITE 240
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
(415) 403-0100
[] 2250 EAST iMPERIAL HIGHWAY [] 650 CAPITOL MALL
SUITE 545 SUITE 6544
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
(310} 414-5700 (916) 448-2787
[] 2300 TULARE STREET [] 600 B STREET
SUITE 130 SUITE 2240
FRESNO, CA 93721 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
(209) 497-5109 (619) 239-3884
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
[] 210 NORTH E STREET
SUITE 210
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
(909) 888-8525
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\Mystic Lake CC.doc
3
Spring arrives at San Jacinto Wildlife Area while much of California is
still winter white and cold. Spectacular displays of alkali goldfields, brittle-
bush and tidy tips turn the grasslands hues of yellow and ochre. Foraging
golden eagles, ferruginous hawks and prairie falcons glide effortlessly on
unseen thermal currents above the shimmering fields. Nearby, the snow-
capped peaks of Mount San Jacinto and San Gorgonio stand quiet,
impressive and remote.
By Jeanne Clark
A view of the wetlands, with snow-capped Mr. San Gorgonio and the San Bernadino Mountains in the distance. Photo by Narca A.
Moore-Craig.
History
The San Jacinto Valley was once a
blend of wetlands, riparian woodlands
and rich grasslands that supported
abundant plant and animal life. As with
other California regions durinc~ the
1800s, this natural diversiW was sacri-
ficed to control flooding and increase
land for agricultural development.
The natural features of the area
continued to change with the influx of
people and urbanization. Soon, the
southern California population
exceeded local water supplies and the
State Water Project was devised to
resolve water problems.
The San Jacinto Wildlife Area was
purchased as partial compensation for
the loss of wildlife and habitat due to
the construction of State Water Pro-
ject facilities. In no way can it replace
what has been lost. But this bit of stra-
tegically located real estate has
already become a significant magnet
for resident and migratory wildlife
populations.
General Description
San Jacinto Wildlife Area is a place
of distinctions. Its 4,700 acres were
purchased during Z980 and 1986.
These statistics may not seem com-
pelling, until you realize that this pre-
cious wildlife habitat is located in the
middle of an urban area, just a few
hours drive for nearly 10 million peo-
ple. Then, San Jacinto's proportions
and recent acquisition take on a much
larger meaning.
Portions of San Jacinto are gradu-
ally being reestablished as wetlands.
Three of the five permanent ponds
have now been filled with water from
wells donated by two supportive con-
servation organizations, Southern
California Ducks and Ducks Unlim-
ited. Newly planted vegetation is now
beginning to take hold and will provide
much-needed cover. Already, Ameri-
can avocet, black-necked stilt, red-
head, cinnamon teal, mallard and
other nesting species are being drawn
to these new wetlands.
Until recently, adequate water sup~-
!ies were a significant problem.
Through an innovative program, San
Jacinto will become the first state wild-
life area to utilize reclaimed water to
enhance its wetlands. This project will
allow many improvements and offers
hope for restoring populations of
white-faced ibis, American bittern, ful-
vous whistling duck and others that
once nested on a nearby lake that was
subsequently drained for agriculture.
Roads encircle each of the ponds
and provide good access for vehicles
or hikers year round. The majority of
the area is non-native grasslands and
is bisected by Davis Road. These
shimmering fields draw an incredible
variety of raptors, including six species
of owls. Frequent parking areas make
it easy to stop and view wildlife; hiking
is permitted over much of the grass-
lands area.
San Jacinto shelters several threa-
tened or endangered species --and a
habitat type that is considered among
the most endangered in the nation due
to development. The coastal sage
scrub is very open, with low, sparse
shrubs and grasses. Life is abundant
and starkly beautiful here, but it is
painted in drab hues and subtle tex-
tures, particularly in summer.
Fall
In late August, you can hear the
sharp, low-pitched "kreep, kreep" of
the Baird's sandpiper, announcing its
arrival and the end of a nonstop flight
that may span several thousand miles[
It is one of the first of the shorebirds
to seek these seasonal wetlands;
within weeks, a half dozen other spe-
cies are also scattered around the
edges of the ponds.
Small flocks of green-winged teal,
northern pintail and northern shoveler
arrive in September, as the days grow
cooler. The teal scribe the sky with
graceful maneuvers as the males pro-
vide a chorus of whistling calls. Green-
winged teal are small ducks; the males
are easy to spot with their glossy
chestnut heads and dark green eye
patch.
The diving ducks fly in with October
-- the large, compact redheads, scaup
and ringneck ducks. By November,
there is a colorful gathering of water-
fowl, feeding, preening and resting on
the ponds of San Jacinto Wildlife
Area.
The population of raptors has also
been steadily increasing. While few
make their home on the wildlife area,
golden eagles, ferrugino~s hawks and
prairie falcons rely on the grasslands'
rodents and birds for foraging. You
should be able to see their hunting
strategies from the parking areas on
Davis Road, particularly in the morn-
ings and late afternoons.
Winter
Other areas are cloaked by winter
storms, while here, tender shoots of
green poke out among the dry
grasses. Winter is a spectacular time
at San Jacinto. The daytime tempera-
tures are often gentle and the air is
surprisingly clear. Waterfowl and rap-
tor populations are at their peak.
Avid birdwatchers determined to
celebrate the Audubon Society's tradi-
tional Christmas Bird Count quite
literally flock to the San Jacinto Valley
and the wildlife area is the center for
this birding activity. For several years,
the single day count has exceeded 160
species. This total is very impressive,
the second highest number recorded
for inland areas in the entire country.
The open fields reached by Davis
Road often provide sighrings of three
of four species of a sparrow-like bird
called the longspur. A field guide will
help you distinguish between the
Lapland, chestnut-collared and
McCown's varieties. You shouldn't
need much help identifying the fre-
quent and distinctive streaks of blue
among the grasses as the colorful
mountain bluebird.
Burrowing owls favor the same
fields and are among the six species of
owl found in the area. These distinc-
tive raptors have been spotted at
more than 12 different sites in the
grasslands. Burrowing owls are active
during the day, particularly with a
brood to feed~ you can tell if you've
disturbed one of these small owls by
its frequent bobbing and bowing.
Throughout the gentle grassy slopes
above the floodplain you'll find ample
evidence of the Stephen's kangaroo
rat. Chances are you won't see this
nocturnal animal, which hops like a
kangaroo and more closely resembles
a squirrel than a rat. But the holes in
the roads and fields you see may be its
burrows. San Jacinto Wildlife Area
has perhaps 1,000 acres of suitable
habitat for this endangered species. It
is considered one of the areas critical
for its recovery.
On a winter day, climb the Bernas-
coni Hills, the rocky ridge that borders
Lake Perris State Recreation Area.
The boulder-strewn hills rise abruptly,
a sudden anomaly in otherwise fiat
terrain. With an easy hike, you can
enjoy a spectacular vista: the snow-
shrouded peaks of San Jacinto and
San Gorgonio form a backdrop for t~,e
winter serenity of the marshes and
grasslands.
Spring
The giant boulders on the ridge are
now fringed with greenery, with clus-
ters of spring wildflowers. The mea-
dows along the floodplain of the San
Jacinto River are ablaze with brilliant
tidy tips, alkali goldfields and other
subtle colors. On a warm day, you
may see a small orange-throated whip-
tail or a granite spiny lizard, distinc-
tively large and colorful, sunning itself
on a rock. It's a favorite resting spot
for people, too.
The greater roadrunner's resonant
cooing is a reminder that spring has
truly arrived, even though it is only
February. Watch for this large brown
bird with the long tail in open fields or
demonstrating its name along the
roads.
Dense patches of cattail hide nests
of woven grasses that belong to the
conspicuous and noisy tricolored
blackbirds; by March there will also be
raucous yellowheads mixed in with the
group.
The avocets and stilts begin building
their nests in March. If you watch any
of the islands in the ponds you can see
them sitting on eggs placed in a
depression in the soil. They may pro-
test your presence by using the same
wounded wing display so often asso-
ciated with killdeer.
All spring long, you'll be treated to
reminders of nature's cycles and
intensity. Resident wildlife are at var-
Endangered habitat, the coastal sage scrub.
Photo by Narca A. Moore-Craig.
Red diamond rattlesnake. Photo by
Ray Quigley.
ious stages of nesting and raising their
broods of young. At the same time,
clusters of migratory visitors depart,
answering that ancient call north.
White-fronted geese, the first to leave,
rise in conspicuous, noisy funnels. The
mountain bluebirds and many shor-
birds are quick to follow.
Summer
Much of southern California is now
bronzed and dry~ places with water,
like San jacinto, concentrate local
wildlife. During the early summer
months, the young of the year can be
seen in and near the ponds. There are
pied-billed grebes, common moorhens
and ruddy ducks. Some nesting
shorebirds and blackbirds even
stretch their stay until July.
The midday sun can be relentless,
but early mornings and evenings are
refreshingly cool and the wildlife
responds. Tree frogs and western
toads provide a chorus of sounds that
echo across the ponds. In the evening,
lesser nighthawks perform their acro-
batics above the water, feeding on
insects in midair. Desert cottontail,
Virginia opossum and even southern
mule deer come to the ponds to drink.
Don'~ be deceived by coastal sage
scrub, for it, too, has its share of wild-
life. The sometimes dull colors and
Endangered Stephen's kangaroo rat. Photo
by Narca A. Moore-Craig.
secretive daytime habits of these
animals provide life-sustaining protec-
tion from the sizzling temperatures.
Lizards sun themselves in the morning
hours. Roadrunners search for insects
among the shrubs. Blue grosbeak sing
and perch among the shrubs, their
midnight blue bodies and rusty,
streaked wings shining in the sun.
And just when it seems summer will
never end, the Baird's sandpiper can
be seen, foraging along the pond's
edge -- a sure sign the fall migration
cycle is beginning again. ~
Activities
Nature observation, photography
and hiking all year. Best time to visit
is October through March.
Hunting: Waterfowl, dove, quail,
cottontail and jackrabbit.**
Fishing: No fishing at this time.
Dog Trials: By permit.**
**as per DFG and local
regulations.
Facilities
Yes: Vehicle access and parking
areas, restrooms, drinking water.
No: Camping, phones.
What's to Come
Visitors' center, interpretive pro-
grams and displays, self-guiding
nature trails; map; fishing, disabled
access.
Rare, Threatened and
Endangered Species
Stephen's kangaroo rat, bald
eagle, peregrine falcon, Swainson's
hawk.
Weather
Summers are hot and dry, winters
are mild with occasional rain.
Nearby Attractions
Lake Perris State Recreation Area,
Mount San Jacinto State Park.
Directions
From 1-215, go east on Ramona
Expressway to Lakeview, then north
on Davis Road 2.3 miles to DFG
headquarters. From Highway 60 in
Moreno Valley, go south on Theo-
dore Street until pavement begins to
turn, then continue straight south on
dirt road, which becomes Davis
Road, for 3.5 miles.
Information
Department of Fish and Game
San Jacinto Wildlife Area
17050 Davis Road
PO Box 254
Lakeview, CA 92353
(714) 654-0580
~ :' ~ ,.~ ,.,. ,., ... :..;-.......-~ ,-~.:~::." ',:~ · , .. , . -
A field of yellow flddleneck reaches toward Mr. San Jaclnto, Photo by Narca A.
Moore-Craig.
-L
!-, ....
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official
January 26, 1999
Service Authority for the Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles
Prepared by: Marianne L. Salazar, Code Enforcement Officer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA TO ESTABLISH A SERVICE
AUTHORITY FOR ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT
BACKGROUND: In 1990 Assembly Bill 4114 was enacted into law. This Bill repealed and
amended California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 9250.7, 22665 and 22710 as they relate to an
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program (AVA). A copy of AB 4114 is attached identified as Exhibit
Assembly Bill 4114 states that a Service Authority for the abatement of abandoned vehicles may
be established in any County if the Board of Supervisors in that County, by two-thirds vote, and a
majority of the cities having a majority of the incorporated population within the County have
adopted resolutions providing for the establishment of the Authority. The membership of the
Authority shall be determined by concurrence of the Board of Supervisors and a majority vote of the
cities within the County having a majority of the incorporated population. Existing County and City
personnel shall staff the Authority.
The Assembly Bill further states that a Service Authority may impose a service fee of one dollar
($1.00) per vehicle registered to an owner with an address in the County, which has established
Service Authority. It is important to note that regardless of a City participating in the AVA program
or not, citizens of the City will be assessed the additional one dollar ($1.00) per vehicle registered,
with the funds being set aside in the City's name with the Service Authority.
The City of Temecula has been an active participant of the Service Authority established by the
County, since 1993. To date, the City of Temecula has received over $70,808.00 in revenue from
R:\BROCKMEI\AGENDA\AVA.DOC ] 1/20/99
the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program. This revenue has been used to support the additional
staff needed to maintain the City's AVA Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the City of Temecula will be eligible to recover abandoned
vehicle abatement costs up to a maximum of approximately $25,000.00 per year during this
legislation that is in effect, or until all respective appropriated funds are deleted.
R:\BROCKMEI\AGENDA\AVA.DOC 2 1/20/99
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH
A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR ABANDONED VEHICLE
ABATEMENT
WHEREAS, Section 9250.7 of the California Vehicle Code was amended in 1990 to
provide for the establishment of a Service Authority of Abandoned Vehicle Abatement (AVA) if
the Board of Supervisors of the County and a majority of the cities within the County having a
majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula finds that abandoned, inoperable,
wrecked, dismantled vehicles or parts thereof pose a health and safety hazard and are found to
be public nuisances; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula finds that an abandoned vehicle
abatement program is needed to provide for the proper removal and disposal of abandoned
vehicles and assist law enforcement and code enforcement personnel in abatement of
abandoned vehicles; and,
WHEREAS, the Riverside County AVA Service Authority will have responsibility for
implementing an abandoned vehicle removal program in Riverside County region;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Council of the
City of Temecula hereby requests that a Service Authority for Abandoned Vehicles be
established in the City of Temecula pursuant to the provisions of Section 22710 of the California
Vehicle Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula directs that
the members of the Incorporated Cities and the County shall serve as the Service Authority for
Abandoned vehicles in the City of Temecula.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula approves
the vehicle abatement program and plan of the AVA Service Authority of the County of
Riverside and a one dollar ($1.00) vehicle registration fee be imposed by the Service Authority
shall remain in effect only for a period of five years.
R:\brockmei\resos\aval
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the __ day of __ 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CM
City Clerk
[SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the th day of 1999, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\brockmei\resos\ava 1
A~embly Bill No. 4114
CHArrI~ IC~4
An act to a~nend Section 22665 of, :rod to repeal and add Sections
9250,7 and 22710 of, the Veifieie Code, reidring to vehicies, and mak-
ing an appropriation therefor.
(Approved by GoVernor 5e ~tesnber 30, lggO. '~led ~th
5e~'etm7 of 5tare ~ptentber 3{}, J.~j~.J
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL~ DIG.E,~r
A]3 4114. Clute. Motor vehicles: abandonment.
'Existing jaw imposed a $1 vehicle registration fee/or deposit in the
Abandoqcd Vet~icte Trust Fund which is continuously appropriated
for costs 'o[ the Controller, Department oF the California Highway
Pa~ol, and specified local abandoned vehicle nuisance abatement
progr-nu.
This bill would delete those provisions and would provide for the
establishment and termination oF service authorities for tim
abatexnent of abandoned vehicles and/unding o[ local abandoned
vehicle abatement proSTerns, as ~pecitled. The bill would authorize
a service au'U~ority,/or a specLfied period, to impose a fee o[ S1 on
vehicles registered in the county which established the service
authority: Those fees would be deposited in the Abandoned Vehicle
Trust Fund which this bill would create and would be continuously
appropriated [or allocation by the ControLler to fund local vehicle
abatement progranu alter deduction of certain administrative costs.
Appropriation: yes..
The peopie of the Slate o[ a~liron:ia do ennce as rollo,vx:
SECTION I. The Legislature finds and declares that the problem
'o[abandoned vehicles is continuing to grow and recognizes that local
governments have insufficient resources to adequately addre~ the
problem. The Legislature Further finds that the increase in
abandoned vehicles is not ordy a public zzuisance, but a dangqr to the
public's health and safety. Therefore, hi order to ensdre the
abatement of abandoned vehicles, the Legislature finds it necessary
to provide for the establishment oF local service aur/xorities for the
purpose of nbatiug abandoned vehicles.
SEC. -?-. Section 9250.7 oF the Vehicle Code is repealed.
SEC. 3. Section 9250.7 is added to the Vei~icle Code, to read:
9250.7. (a) A service authorit), established under Section 22710
may impose a sen, ice fee oF one dollar ($1) on vehicles regutered to
an owner with an address in the county which established the service
authority. The Fee sicall be paid to the deparunent at the t/me of
registration, or reqewa/oF registration, or when renewal becomes
go 5o
Ch. 1684 2
delinquent, on or after january 1, 1992, except vehicles that axe
· expres~iy exempted under this code from the payment
registration fee~.
(b) The department, after deducting its aci. min/~trative costs, shall
transmit, at least quarterly, Hie net mount collected pursuant to
subdivision (a) to the Treasurer for deposit in the Abandoned
Vehicle Trust Fund ~vhich is hereby created. All money in the Fund
i~ continuously appropriated to the Controller for allocation to a
service authority which has an approved abandoned vehicle
abatement program pun'uant to Section' .?.'Y710, and for payment
the administrative costs of the Controller. After deductioll of its
administrative costs, the Controller shall allocate the money in the
Abandoned Vehicle Trust Fund to each service authority in
proportion to the revenue.~ received from the fee imposed by that
authority pursuant to subdivision (a) .
(c) The fee imposed by a service aufllority shah remain in effect
only for a period of five years after the date on which the authority
is established.
' ~jEC. 4. Section P2.665 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
9.2665. Notwith~tm.nding Section P--°710 or any other provision of
law, the department my, at the request of a local authority, other
than a service authority, ad.rnin~ter on behalf of the authority its
abandoned vehicle abatement and removal program established
pursuant to Section P2.660.
SIT-C. 5. Section ZTfI0 of the Vehicle Code is re~ealed.
SEC. 6. Section ??_°710 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
~°710. (a) A service authority For the abatement of abandoned
vehicles may be established, and a one dollar (SI) vehicle
regutration fee imposed, in any county if the board of supervisors of
the county, by a two-thirds vote, and a majority of the cities having
a majority of the incorporated population within the county have
adopted resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority
and imposition of the fee. The membership of the authority shah be
determined by concurrence of the board of supervisors and
-majority vote of the majority of the cities within the county havu'xg
z majority of the incorporated population.
(b) The authority may contract and may undertake any act
conven,ent or nece.~ary to carry out any law retatLng to the
authority. The authority shall be staffed by ex.~tmg county and city
personnel.
(c) (1) Not'withstanding any other provision of law, a service
authority may adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the
abatement. removal. and d~osal a~ public nu.L~ances, of abandoned,
wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts thereof from
private or public ,Jroperty: and for the recovery, pursuant to Section
2.5845 or 3~'773.5 of the Government Code, or asurnption by the
service authority, of cost~ of adtnin~tration ~nd that removal and
disposal. The actual removal and disposal of vehicles shale be
Ch. 1684
undertaken by an entity which may be a count'v or city. or fie
deparmaen~, pursuant to con:act with the service aur. hont'y as
provided in this section.
(2) The money received by an authority pursuant to Section
9250.7 and th/s section shall be used oniy for the abacement,'removai.
and disposal as public nuisances of any abandoned, wrecked,
dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts thereof from private or
public property.
(d) (1) An abandoned vehicle abatement program and plan of a
service authority shall be implemented only with the approval of the
county and a majority of the cities having a rnajonty of the
incorporated population.
(2) The department shall provide guidetines for abandoned
vehicle abatement progr=.vns. An authonty's abandoned vehicle
abatement plan and program shall be cons/sten: with those
guidelines, and shall provide for, but not be Limited to, an est~'nate
of the number of abandoned vehicles, a disposal and enforcement
strategyxinciuding contractual agreemenu, and appropriate fiscaj
con:cry.
(3) The approved plan shall be submitted to the department by
August 1, 1991. T. he department shall review the plan and make
recommendations for revision, if any, of the plan by October i, 1991.
The service authority shall submit the plan, as revised, to the
department and, ff determined by the department to be cons/stent
with the guidelines. shall submit the plan to the Controller by the
follov.~ng January 1. Except as provided in subdivision (e), the
Controller shall make no allocations for a calendar year to a service
authority for which an approved plan was not received on or before
january I of that year.
(e) Any approved plan which was adopted by the authority
pursuant to subdivision (d) may be revised pursuant to the
procedure prescribed in subdivision (d) , including compliance with
any dates described thereto for subrmssion to the department and
the Contoilet. respecnvety, m the year in which the rev/sions are
proposed. Compliance v~th that procedure shall only be required if
the revisions are substantial. A servXcc authority, which is new.ky
formed and has not comvL/ed with subdivtsmn (d) may so comply
a/ter the elates specified in subdivision (d) by submitting an
approved ptan on or before those dates in the year m which the plan
is submitted.
(F) A service authont'y. flail cease to exist on the date that all
revenues received by the authont'y pursuant to this section and
Secnon 9250.7 have been exvended.
SEC. 7. The Department of the California Highway Patrol shall
report to the LegLsiature by january 1. 1996, on the effectiveness of
the abandoned vehicle abatement prograrru conducted pursuant to
Sections 9250.7 and ~_2710 of the Vehicle Code. Upon request of the
Deparment of the Caifforma H/ghway Pa:ol, a service authority
Ch. 1684
created pursuant to .SecticOn Z!'/iO shall submit data reiafive to the
operaUon of iU abecloned verde abatem~t prog~. to ~e
deponent.
96
ITEM 6
CITY MANAGER ~:~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities in
Tract No. 22761 (Westerly corner of Ynez Road at Preece Lane)
PREPARED BY,~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities
for public improvements in Tract No. 22761.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND: On July 14, 1992, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22761, and
entered into subdivision agreements with:
Weyerhaeuser Venture Company, a Nevada Corporation
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and for
subdivision monumentation and Traffic Signalization Mitigation. Accompanying the subdivision
agreements were surety bonds posted by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 400 JJ 3791 in the amount of $856,500 ($476,500, $197,000, and $183,000,
respectively) for Street and Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements for faithful performance.
2. Bond No. 400 JJ 3791 in the amount of $428,500 ($238,500, $98,500, and $91,500,
respectively) for Street and Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements for labor and materials.
3. Bond No. 400 JJ 3792 in the amount of $47,000 for subdivision monumentation.
4. Bond No. 400 JJ 3793 in the amount of $12,000 for traffic signalization mitigation fees.
I
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PW~AGDRPTL99\O126\TR22761 FNL.DOC
On October 7, 1997, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty
period, and authorized release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation and Subdivision Monumentation
securities and reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts to the ten percent (10%) warranty level
as follows:
Streets & Drainage, Water & Sewer Improvements/Bond No. 400 JJ 3791
$85,650
The one-year warranty pedod having expired, Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements
and any required repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Therefore Staff recommends
release of this Faithful Performance Warranty security.
The developer posts Labor and Materials security to assure payment to suppliers of labor and materials.
This security is retained for the contractual six-month lien period following City Council acceptance of
the public improvements. No claims having been made, Staff recommends release of the following
Labor and Materials security:
Streets & Drainage, Water & Sewer Improvements/Bond No. 400 JJ 3791 $428,500
The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution
97-110 on October 7, 1997. The streets within the subdivision are Code Ocaso, Calle Reva, and portions
of Preece Lane,Tierra Vista Road, and Ynez Road. Ynez Road in this reach was in the County
Maintained-Road System prior to incorporation and became a portion of the City Maintained-Street
System by succession on December 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
2
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PW~GDRPT',99\0126\TR22761 FNL.DOC
VICINITY HAP
(lfl. rlG't|"N F~YliEZ. ROAD ll41.49.')
76. Z4'
"-~liAB*lr~'li"H) LOT 'A' ' 140}
00,),,\\\\\',\\\\\\\\\\',\\\\\\\\\\\\\\%\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\
-. ,,~.,~,,L,,/,~:./,, ,,I,, ,.~
(~) ~ '. C~LLE N4CIDO
,..,. 2 '; '; :~ ~'
,-- v, ,-, ,~ , : --
:
Tract No. ?-?-761 %'~
Location Map
P.R.C. I k
/
/
NO'IT,: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,E
ITEM 7
APPROVALL~
CITY A'TTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
Accept Subdivision Improvements in Tract No. 22762
intersection of Ynez Road at Preece Lane)
(Westerly of the
PREPARED BY:/~.~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
7~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities
for public improvements in Tract No 22762
DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND: On July 14, 1992, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22762, and
entered into subdivision agreements with:
Weyerhaeuser Venture Company, a Nevada Corporation
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by St. Paul Fire
and Marine Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. 400 JJ 3794 in the amount of $577,000 ($455,000, $64,500, and $57,500, respectively)
for Street and Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements for faithful performance.
2. Bond No. 400 JJ 3794 in the amount of $288,500 ($227,500, $32,500, and $29,000,
respectively) for Street and Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements for labor and materials.
3. Bond No. 400 JJ 3795 in the amount of $16,500 for subdivision monumentation.
4. Bond No. 400 JJ 3796 in the amount of $17,500 for traffic signalization mitigation fees.
I
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTSXPW~GDR PT~99\0126\TR22762FNL.DOC
On October 7, 1997, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty
period, and authorized release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation and Subdivision Monumentation
securities and reduction in the Faithful Performance bond amount to the ten percent (10%) warranty
level as follows:
Streets & Drainage, Water & Sewer Improvements/Bond No. 400 JJ 3794 $57,700
The one-year warranty period having expired, Staff has inspected and reviewed the public
improvements and any required repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Therefore
Staff recommends release of this Faithful Performance Warranty security.
The developer posts Labor and Materials secudty to assure payment to suppliers of labor and materials,
This security is retained until the contractual six-month lien period following City Council acceptance of
the public improvements has run. No claims having been made, Staff recommends release of the
following Labor and Materials security:
Streets & Drainage, Water & Sewer Improvements/Bond No. 400 JJ 3794 $288,500
The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution
97-110 on October 7, 1997. The streets within the subdivision are Code Malbino, Via Asado, and
podions of Code Fresca, and Tierra Vista Road.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
2
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PW~,GDRPT~99\0126\TR22762FNL.DOC
- ~- ' ~/:
~ VICIMITY M/J) '*
4,
· ~
13T~.91 ')
I r~,r'r'''?' v
· .~. r :q**' v
' ~.v...~- :~: '
/
\ \
Tract No. 22762
Location
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,F~
ITEM 8
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City ManagedCity Council
~'~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
SUBJECT:
Release Bond for Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees for Parcel 3 in Parcel
Map No. 19580-1. (W/o Diaz Road and N/o Rancho California Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
~/r_-( Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
AUTHORIZE release of bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees for Parcel 3 in Parcel Map No.
19580-1.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the owners and surety.
BACKGROUND: The County of Riverside approved Parcel Map No. 19580-1 on October
30, 1986, and entered into agreements with the developer, Kaiser Development, including a
deferment agreement for payment of traffic signal mitigation fees. A bond was posted by Insurance
Company of North America as follows:
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Bond No. KO 21 00 14 9
$207,882.50
Where securities are posted in accordance with the agreements, these securities are generally held
in full until all of the parcel owner/developers have paid the pertinent traffic signalization mitigation
fees. This may require several years to accomplish in industrial park developments where a number
of builders may develop on one of many parcels in the overall development. In the subject instance,
the County of Riverside authorized a partial reduction of $107,882.50 on October 6, 1988, leaving
$100,000 to cover the remaining undeveloped parcels.
The developer, Kaiser Development Company (successors were KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, L.L.C.,
now ZKS) sought further reduction to cover just the three remaining undeveloped parcels (Parcels
3, 6, and 13). Buyers of Parcels 6 and 13 had not paid the requisite fees or submitted substitute
agreements and securities at the time of the last reduction. The City Attorney directed Staff to retain
sufficient coverage by the contractual developer until the fees for the parcels no longer owned by
that developer had either been paid or securities were posted with the City.
R:V~GDRPTL99~0126~PM195801 .TSM.DOC
On June 25, 1996, the City Council accepted a new security and agreement from KI/FKLA Rancho
Realty, L.L.C., said security was posted by The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as follows:
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Bond No. 100869980-96-057
$31,191.06
In the interim, the owners of both Parcels 6 and 13 have paid their respective traffic signalization
mitigation fees. The developer then sold the remaining Parcel 3 to:
Harry and Linda Clark
28765 Single Oak Drive,#200
Temecula, CA 92590
for which said buyers submitted a substitute Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond and Traffic Signalization
Mitigation Agreement which were accepted by the City Council on March 31, 1998.
The bond was posted by Frontier Pacific Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. SD00015981 for traffic signalization mitigation in the amount of $5,140.50
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize release of the subject bond for Parcel No. 3.
With the implementation of the Development Impact Fee (DIF) structure set forth by Ordinance No.
97-09, these commercial/industrial parcels are assessed traffic signalization mitigation fees based
on building square footage rather than the historical per gross acreage of the total parcel.
The owners have requested that their bond be released as the contractual conditions (per gross
acreage) no longer apply. The DIF structure assures that the per square footage fees are paid prior
to building permit issuance. Thus the release of this security does not imperil the payment of the
required fees but rather eliminates the need to pay annual premiums on a security that no longer
applies under current City Codes for non-residential uses. Staff therefore recommends the release
of the following security:
Bond No. SD00015981 for traffic signalization mitigation in the amount of $5,140.50
All streets within the Parcel Map boundary are in the City Maintained-Streets System by succession
to the County of Riverside.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
None
Location Map
2
\\TEMEC FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PW~,GDRPT~99\0126\PMI 95801 .TSM.DOC
- ~. '4~ 'c~ .
tO / t,l II
./
~ /
PARCEL MAP NO. 19580-1
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
24~/'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula Rod Run 1999 Event in
Old Town. (Front Street, and related streets, between Moreno Street and
First Street)
PREPARED BY: ~J~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES
FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1999 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC
SPECIAL EVENTS
BACKGROUND: The Annual Rod Run necessitates the physical closure of certain
streets in the Old Town area, and related detouring, to accommodate and provide the "Street Scene"
ambience that allows the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential vehicular-
pedestrian conflicts.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways
under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other
instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events,
and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during
the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way.
While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for
delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events.
r:~agdrpt\99\0126~rodruncl.ose
The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the
Temecula Rod Run 1999 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town Association. This authority is
limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special
events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the
approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These
rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular
Code Section 21101.
This years Rod Run Event sponsors propose street closures as follows: Front Street between
Moreno Road (E) to 1st Street from 6:00am to 5:00pm on Saturday February 13th, 1999, and from
6:00 am to 4:00pm on Sunday, February 14th, 1999; 5th Street, 4th Street, Main Street, 3rd Street,
and 2nd Street between Front Street and Mercedes Street, and Main Street from Front Street to the
southwesterly side of the Main Street Bridge from 6:00am Saturday to 4:00pro Sunday; 6th Street
to be closed southwesterly of the City Parking Lot to Front Street within the same time limits in order
to provide Bus access/departure from the City Parking Lot.
Some partial closures, as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for "Block
Parties" on cul-de-sac streets only, have not been submitted for City Council action in order to
reduce the impact on City Council and staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated costs for the Public Works Department Maintenance Division
support is estimated at $3,800.00. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-164-601-5402.
ATTACH M ENTS:
1. Resolution No. 99-
2. Location Map
r:~agdrpt~99\0126~rodruncl.ose
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET
CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1999 EVENT, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMIT FOR
THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the
Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town Association, for which such
temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use
those streets for the special event: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close public streets for the Temecula Rod Run 1999 Event: and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve
temporary street closures for the Temecula Rod Run 1999 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town
Association, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall
be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Temecula Rod Run 1999
Event, and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be
approved or denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 26th day of January 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk
r:~agdrptL99\0126~rodruncl.ose
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of January 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:~agdrpfi99\0126Vodruncl.ose
Rod Run General l.ayout
Location Map
NOTE: MAP NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
_'_/Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Signal Equipment
PREPARED BY:
/~211JWilliam G. Hughes, Senior Engineer-Capital Projects
uJM,Ward 13. Maxwell, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES,
FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula acquired certain parcels for Rights-Of-Way,
slope easements, storm drain easements, rights-of-entry and temporary construction
agreements, and traffic signal maintenance easements, all relating to the infrastructure
improvements required for the Promenade Mall Project, which were accepted by City Council on
August 25, 1998, as Resolution No. 98-85.
The underlying fee owner of the affected land and grantor of the several rights in land are
CIP Temecula, LLC
The attached documents are for a construction and maintenance easement for a new traffic
signal along the northerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road.
This easement needs to be accepted by the City and recorded to facilitate construction activities
for the Promenade Mall.
FISCALIMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 99- , with Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B"
Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Easement
R:~agdrpt\99/0112/signal.esmt
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES, FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROMENADE MALL
PROJECT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The property owners as shown in Exhibit "B" have granted an easement to the
City of Temecula for the purpose of the installation and maintenance of traffic signal equipment on
northerly side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Winchester Road on remainder parcel PM
23335.
WHEREAS, The legal description for the remainder parcel off Winchester Road as set forth
and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto;
WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to construct and maintain that
portion of the traffic signal facilities located within the driveway;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts Easement Deed for Traffic Signal Maintenance purposes, as offered by CIP Temecula
LLC, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", for the purposes stated therein,
but not for street or other maintenance purposes at this time. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to
make minor modifications to the legal descriptions on said documents.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 261h day of January 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\99/0112/signal.esmt
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 261h day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\99/0112/signal.esmt
3
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Tcmecula
PER GOV'T CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temc. cule - City Clerk
P O Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr.
Teme, cula, CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Tem~cuh
P O Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
EASEMENT DEED - TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
CT? ALE
GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for traffic signal equipment, including
the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California,
described as:
See Attached Exhibit "A" For Complete Description
IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument
this Scven'P~ day of Apr;~ , 19 q ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
On AprCX '7''~, Iclc~ , before me the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
personally known to me (ol: prorod to ,..c on tim basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s-) whose name(~')d~'are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sis,q. hey executed the same
in hislk;r,'~:.b' authorized capacity(.ise), and that by his/h.,,tt4,~ signature(~.)
on the instant the person(~.), or the entity upen behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
Print Name and Title
r'q, Norma,~ ~ St. V,ce
"presiderrl
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
By:
Steven~
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Ydtaff~ity Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City ARomey
R:~AGMTS~SGNLEQIP.MNT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AN EASEMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS OVER A PORTION OF THE
REMAINDER PARCEL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23335 FILED IN BOOK 172, PAGES 87 THROUGH 89 OF
PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO
BEING COMMON TO SAID REMAINDER PARCEL, LOT "B" AND WELL SITE NO. 108 OF SAID PARCEL
MAP;
THENCE NORTH 03°07'36'' EAST A DISTANCE OF 37.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41 °52'24"WEST A DISTANCE OF 64.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48007'36'' EAST A DISTANCE OF 37.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41 °52'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 68.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48°07'36'' EAST A DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86o52'24'' EAST A DISTANCE OF 31.11 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY
PARCEL LINE OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL AND SAID LOT "B";
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY PARCEL LINE, SOUTH 48°07'36'' WEST
A DISTANCE OF 107.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,433 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED.
BASIS OF BEARINGS BEING THE CENTERLINE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, SHOWN AS N 48o07'36'' E
PER PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1.
H:\HAWTHO- 1 \EASEME- 1 \ED\PM23335.WPD
March 26, 1998 (12:19pm)
Page 1
SCALE:
</
o~
, XHIBIT "B"
. PORTION OF REMAINDER PARCEL
.-,, ARCEL.MAp NO. 23335
"
'., ; ~
\
F~JV] 2~3~G3=3
LEGEND
EASEMENT
NO3° 07 ' 36 "E
37.69'
DIVUMDANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON, & MENOENHALL
275 WEST HOSPITALITY LANE, SUITE 3t4
4
SAN BERNARDINO CA 92 08
(909) 889-3466
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAI~
CITY A'R'ORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
City ManagedCity Council
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~J Janua~ 26,1999
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
for Construction and Funding of the Western Bypass Corridor -
Project No. PW95-07
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the
P, edevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of the
Western Bypass Corridor.
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form
attached to the Agenda Repod.
BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Improvement Plan includes construction of the
Western Bypass Corridor, Project No. PW95-07. This improvement is partially located within
and benefiting the Project Area of the Temecuta Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1. The
Agency's planning also calls for this Project to be completely funded by the Agency.
The Community Redevelopment Law, a Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220
(b) and (c) specifically authorizes such cooperative agreements allowing a city and a
redevelopment agency to assist each other in the construction and installation of streets, roads,
water, sewer, or drainage facilities.
The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically
authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the
Project Area.
Completion of this Project will promote the goals of the redevelopment, as it will complete
necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement
Program. The Project will also induce private investment in and promote expansion of the
commercial areas served by this project within the Project Area through improved traffic
circulation and freeway access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the
commercial areas served by this project within the Project Area.
r:\agdrpt\99\O126\bypasscoopagrrnt/ajp
1
The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of the Western Bypass Corridor -
Project No. PW95-07 will implement the funding plans of the City and the Agency.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $877,602.26 should be provided by the Agency to fund this agreement.
ATTACHMENT: Cooperative Agreement
r:\agdrpt\99\0126\bypasscoopagrmt/ajp
2
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS
CORRIDOR, PROJECT NO. PW95-07
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of January 26, 1999 by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate
and politic ("Agency"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set tbrth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following/:acts and purposes, which each party finds and
determines to be true and correct:
a. The Community Redevelopment Law at Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction,
and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220 (b) and (c) specifically authorize such cooperative agreements
between a city and a redevelopment agency to assist each other in the constructk~n of widening the southbound off-ramp at 1-15
and Winchester Road from Winchester Road north of Santa Gertrudis Creek bridge.
b. The Redevelopment Plan tk~r the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically authorizes
the expenditure of Agency thnds on road construction within or benefiting the Project Area.
c. The Western Bypass Corridor, Pro. jeer No. PW95-07 is a part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan
and is partially located within and benefiting the Project Area of Temecula Redevelopmerit Project Area 1988-1.
d. No other reasonable means of financing the improvements is available to the Community.
e. Completion of the Project will assist in the elimination of blight within the Project Area as it will
complete necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan within the Project
Area, induce private investment in and promote expansion of the commercial areas served by the Western Bypass Corridor
within the Project Area through improved traffic circulation and freeway access, and promote expansion of employment
opportunities within the commercial areas served by the project within the Project Area, among others. No other reasonable
means of financing the improven~ents is available to the Community.
2. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility for the design and construction of the
Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
3. The City shall undertake the fi~llowing responsibilities with respect to the Project:
a. Prepare the necessary engineering and environmental studies ~>r the Project
b. design the necessary improvements fi~r the Project
c. acquire necessary rights-of-way ~r the Project
d. prepare necessary plans, specifications and bid documents for the Project;
e. obtain all necessary permits and entitlements from other public agencies;
f. solicit bids and award construction contracts tbr the Prqject; and
g. administer the construction contracts.
R: \cip\projccts\pw95\l~w95-O7\rdacoopagnnt/Ljp
4. The Agency shall pay tbr all Project costs, except tbr such costs as the City is obligated to pay
pursuant to this Agreement. City shall pay the costs of acquiring the right-of-way for the Project, which costs
shall include the costs of title reports, apprai~rs, right-of-way agents, and auorneys. Agency shall, however,
reimburse City for its payments made for the value of the right-of-way acquired.
5. The City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the
allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall
be final.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attempt:
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney/Agency General Counsel
2 R: \cip\projecls\pw95\pw95-07\rdacoopagnnt/ajp
ITEM 12
CITY MANAGER ~'~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
January 26, 1999
1999 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal
PREPARED ElY: Denise Lanier, Human Resources Specialist
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve renewing the annual agreement with California
Compensation (CAL Comp) for the City's Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance, subject
to final approval as to form by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND: The City staff continues to be impressed with Cal Comp's commitment to the best
possible service as demonstrated over the past two years. CAL Comp's staff has been
conscientious and consistently demonstrated their dedication to what is best for the City and its
employees. CAL Comp is the second largest writer of workers' compensation coverage in
California, and is surpassed only by the State Compensation Insurance Fund.
The 1999 Plan Year (2/01/99 - 1/31/00) quotes, provided by our benefit broker Mike Bush of Cal
Surance, are as follows:
CAL Comp $55,681
Fremont $57,368
CNA $73,767
State Fund $75,412
*The State Fund quote allows the City the opportunity to possibly receive a dividend return
only if our claim experience for the 1999 policy year is outstanding.
Staff is very pleased with CAL Comp's 1999 quote and believes it reflects CAL Comp's positive
relationship with the City along with their approval of our Loss Prevention Program, under the
leadership of the City's Safety Committee. These quotes were also possible as the City is proud
to report only six (6) claims for the entire 1998 Plan Year. This premium reduction is even more
impressive, as the City's payroll has increased, due to normal merit salary progression, from the
previous plan year. In addition, the experience modification (determined by the relationship of City
claim costs to industry-wide standards) has decreased from 113% to 103%.
Based on the above listed quotes and the quality of the services received; staff recommends the
renewal of coverage with CAL Comp, for the 1999 Plan Year.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CAL Comp quote is saving the City a total of $12,728 for the upcoming
1999 Plan Year. Adequate funds are available in the operating budget to fund this policy.
R\LANIERDAXREPORTXSTAFF51 1/19/99
CAL-SURANCE
PROPOSAL OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
fOE
Coverage Inception Date: 02-01-99
Presented by:
Michael Bush
Sr. Vice President/Account Executive
January 13, 1999
California Insurance License 0256292
333 CIty Boulevard West, Orange, CA 92868
P.O. Box 7048, Orange, CA 92863-7048
714-939-0800
MB:crn013.1 (1-99) 714-939-1654 Fax
INTRODUCTION TO CAL-SURANCE
Cal-Surance Associates, Inc., a member of the Cal-Surance Group, is a full service
insurance brokerage. Specializing in Municipal and Commercial Property, Casualty
and Workers' Compensation Insurance and Risk Management Services, Cal-Surance
represents you, our Clients.
Founded in 1962, we are currently ranked as the 54th largest broker in the country, and
the largest independently owned agency/broker in California.
Our philosophy is client oriented. We strive to provide our customers with
comprehensive programs to properly confront their exposures to loss, through:
Insurance contracts with the best available companies, with the best available
conditions, at the lowest possible cost.
Risk Management techniques to transfer, reduce and control exposures and their
cost.
Our final goal is to reduce the ultimate net cost of risk for our clients and to provide
services in a professional manner.
You are professionals in your field as we are professionals in ours. By using Cal-
Surance to assist in developing and maintaining your insurance program you will free
up your resources and add to the expertise needed for maximum efficiency and
economy.
MB:cm0132 (1-99)
SERVICE PERSONNEL
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICE PERSONNEL
for
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE
Michael G. Bush
Office Direct Line (714)939-7453
Office (714)939-0800
Home (714)998-7479
SENIOR ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR
Judy Pavlik
Office Direct Line: (714)939-7455
Office: (714)939-0800
ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR
Henry Zamora
Office Direct Line: (714)939-7458
Office: (714)838-0800
Address
333 City Boulevard West
Orange, CA 92668
P.O. Box 7048
Orange, CA 92613
Fax
(714)939-1654
MB:cm.0133 (1-99)
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION
Your experience modification for the current year 1999, February 1st is 103 %.
THIS MODIFICATION HAS BEEN DEVELOPED BY THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE
RATING BUREAU BASED UPON YOUR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS EXPERIENCE FOR
THE FOLLOWING YEARS:
1997
1996
1995
MB:cm013.4 (1-99)
MARKETS APPROACHED BY CAL-SURANCE
Insurance Company
Coverages Status
1. California Compensation/
Superior National
Workers' Compensation
Quotation provided.
2. State Compensation
Insurance Fund
Workers' Compensation
Indication Provided
3. Fremont Compensation
Insurance Company
Workers' Compensation
Quotation Provided
4. American Home Assurance
Company (AIG)
Workers' Compensation
Quotation Provided
5. CNA Insurance Company Workers' Compensation Indication provided
MB:cm.013.5 (1-99)
AREAS OF MAJOR CONCERN
(Addressed by Cal-Surance and California Compensation Insurance Company)
1. Senate Bill #198 Compliance (Continuous Audit)
Safety Committee Attendance (Discuss)
A. California Compensation Loss Control Support
B. Film Library Available
C. Attendance by Cal-Surance and Carrier Loss Control
e
Written Safety Program (Review and Update)
Reserve Reviews (Frequency as Desired)
Claims Record Keeping
A. Ease of Reporting (Fax Link)
B. Exchange of Information
1. Fax Link for Claim Status Reports
2. In-House Claims Modem for review of individual claim file detail
(adjuster notes and plans of action).
6. Claims Adjuster Case Load - 150-175 Indenmity
MB:cm.013.6 (149)
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
I. Best's Rating and Financial Size:
B++:IX, Admitted (Owned by Superior National Insurance Company)
II. Location:
Orange, CA (Home Office, Novato, CA - California Compensation)
(Home Office, Calabasas, CA - Superior National)
III. Strong Points:
Loss Prevention, California Workers' Compensation Specialty Company,
Claims Review Scheduling, 2nd Largest Writer of Workers' Compensation in
California.
IV. Review Services
Per Areas of Major Concern Section
MB:crn.013.7 (1-99)
PROPOSAL
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
02-01-99/02-01-00 POLICY PERIOD
ESTIMATED ANNUAL PREMIUM
ONE YEAR - NON PARTICIPATING PLAN
Classification
Municipal (non-manual)
Municipal (all other)
Clerical
Code Payroll Rate
9410 $2,261,380 2.48
9420 $323,885 9.32
8810 $1,981,369 .86
Modification:
Modified Premium:
Premium Modifier:
Total Premium:
Broker Fee
California Admn. & Fraud Assessment:
Premium
$66,002
$30,186
$17,040
$113,228
x 1.03
116,625
.4560
53,181
+2,500
+278
Payment Terms
10% Down
Monthly Installments or Audits
(Discuss)
Net Billing Rates
Code Rate
9410 1.16
9420 4.38
8810 .40
Note: Comparison using 1999 payroll estimates.
Premium using 1998 rates and modification = $64,678 (Savings - $8,997)
Premium using 1998 rates and 1999 modification = $58,953 (Savings - $3,272)
MB:cm.013.8 (1-99)
II.
PROPOSAL -
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (INDICATION)
(A-:XIV, ADMITTED)
Premium: $75,412 (plus California Admin. & Fraud)
III.
PROPOSAL --
FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
(INDICATION) (A-:IX, ADMITTED)
Premium: $57,368 (plus California Admin. & Fraud)
IV.
PROPOSAL --
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
(A++:XV, ADMITTED)
Premium: $73,767
V. CNA INSURANCE
(A:XV, ADMITTED)
Premium: Over $100,000
MB:crnO13.9 (1-99)
CITY OF TEMECULA
Monthly []
C.
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
CLIENT SER VICE AGREEMENT CHECKLIST
January 13, 1999
Management Services
A. Organization of Insurance Files
B. Establishment of Insurance
Review Meetings
Quarterly [] Semi-Annual []
Preparation of Bid Specification
for Bidding of Insurance Program
D. Preparation of Insurance
Summary for Auditors
E. Self-Insurance Analysis
F. Summary of Insurance
G. Profie Center Cost Breakdowns
CURRENTLY
RECEIVING
II.
Workers' Compensation Services
A. Review of Rating Classifications
B. Review of Previous Losses
C. Analyze Causes of Losses
D. Audit of Experience Modification
Worksheet
DESIRED
MB:cm 013.10 (1-99)
III.
G,
Computation of Experience
Modification Three Months in
Advance of Renewal
Major Review of All Losses Prior
to Dividend Computation
Major Review of All Losses Prior
to Submission to California
Inspection Rating Bureau Rate
Modification
Review of Insurance Company
Audit Procedures and Client
Payroll Records
Loss Prevention Services
A. Operation Survey
1. Unsafe Conditions
2. Unsafe Practices
3. Accident Investigation
4. On-Site Inspections
B. Special Hazard Surveys
2.
3.
4.
5.
Machine Guarding
Noise Control
Industrial Hygiene
Fire & Explosion Analysis
Product Control
CURRENTLY
RECEIVING
DESIRED
MB:cm.013.11 (1-99)
C. Loss Control Program
1. Establishment of Program
2. Regular Meeting Attendance
3. Establishment of Safety
Award Program (Including
Maintenance)
4. Maintenance of Program
D. Safety Training
1. Employee Level
2. Supervisory Level
3. Management Level
E. Auto Fleet Service
1. Pre-Employment Forms
2. Driver Safety Meetings
3. Safety Awards
4. Preventative Maintenance
5. Term of Inspection
6. Accident Investigation and
Analysis
7. Control Reports to
Management
8. Riding with Drivers
9. Following Drivers
10. Motor Vehicle Records
11. Driver Packets
F. OSHA Compliance Programs
MB:crn.013.12 (1-99)
CURRENTLY
RECEIVING
DESIRED
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Acting City ManagedCity Council
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official '~
January 26, 1999
Award of Construction Contract for City Hall Tenant Improvement
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Award a construction contract, for tenant improvement work within City Hall to Rizzo
Construction, Inc., Temecula, CA, in the amount of $36,585, and authorize the mayor to execute
the contract.
2. Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve 10% contingency.
3. Approve an appropriation of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000) from the General Fund
undesignated fund balance.
DISCUSSION: In an effort to maximize the use of office space and make existing space more
efficient within City Hall, staff has developed a plan, which will add additional plan storage space,
additional modular office spaces, including private offices. This work will be performed after, or
before, normal working hours, as much as possible, in an effort to be sensitive to the daily City Hall
operations, the public and staff.
A Notice of Inviting Bids was solicited through advertisement in local trade papers and from local
construction firms. Three (3) bids were received and were publicly opened on, January 7, 1999.
Of the three (3) bids received, Rizzo Construction, Inc. was determined to be the only firm meeting
all of the bid requirements as outlined in the Notice of Inviting Bids. Rizzo Construction, Inc., is a
local construction firm and is agreeable to perform the work under the conditions of the scope of the
contract, as noted in Exhibit "A".
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $69,670 have previously been allocated for this project.
An additional appropriation of $13,000 is needed to fund this project. Adequate General Fund
reserves are available for this appropriation.
ATTACHMENT: Agreement
R: \BROCKMEI \AGENDA \RIZZO. DOC | 1/15/99
CITY OF TEMECULA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO CITY HALL
THIS CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT is, made and entered into as of
January 26, 1999, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), and Rizzo Construction,
Inc. (" Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein,
the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall construct and install all of the work
described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
("Work") and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work
to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with
the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the
time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time
as directed in writing by the City.
Contractor shall provide all work necessary to conform the structure to the plans and
specifications approved by the Chief Building Official prior to the date of this Agreement and
to allow for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Chief Building Official, which
Certificate of Occupancy shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Contractor warrants and represents to City that Contractor worked on the site and the
Contractor has fully and carefully inspected and evaluated the site and has familiarized itself
with the work required to complete the Project.
2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1. of this Agreement
Contractor shall receive the sum of thirty six thousand five hundred eighty five dollars
($36,585.00) payable in accordance with the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit A.
If the City disputes any of Contractor's invoiced amounts for work performed, it shall give
written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed amounts set
forth on the invoice.
3. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in
meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor shall cause a full time experienced
Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to oversee and supervise
the Work.
4. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall
be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its
authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year
R: \BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
from date of acceptance.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. The Acting City Manager may approve additional
payment not to exceed 10%, or $3,658.50 of the contract amount.
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under
Paragraph 2., above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation
under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall
constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Contract except those
previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute
an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate
of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of
such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum.
Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6,
and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or
portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated
prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under
him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause,
suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the
City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall
not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of
termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the
Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant
to Section 3.
9. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for
R: \ BROCKME I \AGMTS \ SHE LL
any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor' s control, and
without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the Acting City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor
is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall
serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days
after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of
time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or
nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Contractor' s negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker' s Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the Acting City Manager. At the option of the
City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the
Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile
liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City and the Temecula Community Services District, and
their officers, officials, agents and employees are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and
completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor' s
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires
every employer to be insured against liability for Workman' s Compensation or
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I
will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract."
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services
under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor' s exclusive
direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have
control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor' s officers, employees or agents,
except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers,
employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any
debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee
benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay
salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for
City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or
sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
14. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall
at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to
comply with this section.
15. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of
R: \BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that
may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to
make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on
initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Contract out to
proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor
to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as
a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
16. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work
contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the Acting City Manager his affidavit
stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all
subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding
against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such
part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City.
18. UTILITY LOCATION. City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to
locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the
appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
20. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City
and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers.
Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience
of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly
delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding
any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a
reasonable time after completion of the Work.
21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it
will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in
the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to
the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later
designate by Notice:
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
To City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: Acting City Manager
To Contractor:
Rizzo Construction Inc.
P. O. Box 301
Temecula, CA 92593
Attention: Charles Rizzo, President
25. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of
this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written
consent of the City.
26. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement,
Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the
performance of the services described in this Agreement.
27. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree
that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities
of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set
forth herein and upon each party 's own independent investigation of any and all facts such
party deems material.
29. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or
she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the
authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
By:
Charles Rizzo, Presidem
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
EXHIBIT A.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for this project shall include but is not limited to; the construction of two
(2) new private offices; the modification to the Community Development receptionist area; the
remodel of the existing Copy Center; the installation of cabinetry in the Records Management
office; the remodel of the main lobby receptionists desk; and related electrical and mechanical
modifications and additions as represented in the approved construction plans.
R:\BROCKMEI\AGMTS\SHELL
ITEM 14
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
January 26, 1999
Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for P.C. workstations to Sys Technology, Inc.,
Cypress, California in the amount of $2,482.56 per unit, for a total purchase amount of
~39,720.96.
BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose to
select a qualified vendor to purchase sixteen (16) P.C. workstations. These workstations will
be replacing older systems that no longer meet the technical requirements of the operating
systems in place at City Hall, and were budgeted for in the current 98/99 fiscal budget. A total
of thirteen proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a low of
~2,482.56 from Sys Technology, Inc. of Cypress to a high of $3,921.69 submitted by Optimal
Integrated Solutions of Carlsbad, California. Forty-one RFP packets were mailed (fifteen to local
vendors), of which the following fourteen vendors responded:
Vendor
Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress CA
Resellers Corp of America, Lomita CA
C0mpuSource, Oceanside CA
DTK Computer Inc., City of Industry CA
Optimal Integrated Solutions, Carlsbad CA
Concorde Computer Sys, Inc., San Dimas CA
Golden State Trading Co., Brea CA
Digitech, Temecula CA
CompUSA, San Bernardino CA
Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside CA
Omni Data, Riverside CA
Tangent Computer, San Francisco CA
Unit Price
$2 482.56
$2 549.37
$2 550.44
$2 609.30
~2 651.31
~2 660.35
$2 668.97
$2 818.68
~2 830.80
~2 912.48
~2 927.57
~2 935.11
Total Quote
$39 720.96
$40 789.84
$40 807.08
$41 748.82
$42 421.00
$42 565.56
$42 703.48
$45 098.81
$45292.80
$46599.72
~46 841.08
~46 961.76
Agenda Report
Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
Page 2.
Vendor Unit Price
Optimal Integrated Solutions, Cadsbad CA $3,921.69
New Technologies, Santa Fe Springs CA No Quote
California State Computer Store, Los Angeles CA No Quote
Total Quote
$62,747.00
No Quote
No Quote
Sys Technology, Inc. of Cypress, California submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all
the technical specifications of the RFP.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year Budget for
Information Services Internal Service fund to accommodate this purchase.
ATTACHMENTS:
Request for Price Proposal Sheet - Sys Technology, Inc.
Equipment Purchase Agreement
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUEST FOR PRICE
PROPOSAL SHEET
PART I: EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Qty Description
16 - Personal Computer Workstation, Mini-Tower Cue
(Must comply with Part 15 of FCC Rules)
hatel SE440BX-2 Motherboard wantel 400 MHz Pentium H Processor
128MB 10 0MHz SDRAM Dimra~
8.4GB EIDE Hard Drive
3 'h Teae Floppy Drive
32X Toshiba CD-ROM ATAPI Drive
Iomega Zip Internal ATAPI Drive
ATI XPERT @ PLAY 98 AGP 2X Video Adapter w/8MB RAM
3Com Fast EtherLink 3C905TX NIC
Unit Price
1,100.00
Extended
17,600.00
16 - Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite
19.00 304.00
16 - Microsoft IntelliMouse Pro
20.00 320.00
16 - V iewsonic VP 150 ViewPanel
971.00 15,536.00
16 - APC Back-UPS Pro 420 (Model BP420S)
194.00 3,104.00
Three year paris and labor warran~ on all Hardware
0 0
PART II: PRICING
Equipment per specifications (PART I)
ITEM
TOTAL
PRICE ~
36,864.00 e
Delivery Charges
Sales Tax (Temecula 7.75%)
Other Costs (Please identify)
TOTAL PRICE
o
Vendor Name: SYS TECHNOLOGY, INC Contact: LOUIS SUN
Address: 6481 GLOBAL DR. City/SffZip: CYPRESS, CA 90630
Phone: 71a-Sv1-3qnn Fax: 714-821-9592
Date: 1/1 I/98
5
EOUWMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
This Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of January 26, 1999, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a
municipal corporation, and Sys Technology, Inc., 6481 Global Drive, Cypress, California 90630 ("Vendor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of E{luinment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and
the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City, Personal Computer Workstations as more particularly
described in Exhibit A, Equipment Specifications, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full
(hereafter "Equipment").
2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is Thixlynme Thousand
Seven Hundred Twenty Dollars and Ninty-six Cents ($39,720.96) The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to
Vendor m accordance with the follow ing schedule: Net 30.
3. Renresentations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City:
a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and
perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with
Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the
date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all
necessary action on the pan of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against
Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all ofthe Equipment. Allof the
Equipment are flee and clear of any rest~Bns on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute
title to all of the Equipment flee and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants,
conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All efthe Equipment are in good operating
condition, are flee of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties
set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Computer
Workstations on the City's Wide Area Network consisting of both Microsoff NT and Novell Servers and that the City is
relying on Vendor's warranties lhat the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary pur~ses for which the Equipment
is normally used.
c. Year 2000 Compliance. Vendor warrants that each hardware, software, and firmware product delivered
under this agreement shah be able to accurately process date/time data (including but not limited to, calculating, comparing,
and sequencing) from, into, and between the twentieth and twenty-fwst centuries, and the years 1999 and 2000 and leap year
calculations to the extent that other information technology, used in combination with the information technology being
acquired, properly exchanges datedtime data with it The duration efthis warranty and the remedies available to the City tbr
breach of this warranty shall be as defined in, and subject to, the terms and limitations of the Vendor's standard commercial
warranty or warranties contained in this contract, provided that notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in such
commercial warranty or warranties, the remedies available to the City under this warranty shall include repair or replacement
of any listed product whose non-compliance is discovered and made known to the Vendor in writing within ranely (90) days
after acceptance. Nothing in this warranty shall be construed to limit any rights or remedies the City may otherwise have
under this contract with respect to defects other than Year 2000 performance.
d. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain
or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
4. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before March 1, 1999.
5. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
6. Title an d Risk of Loss. Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destmc~on of the Equipment shall remain with
the Vendor until at~er inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City.
7. Inspection and Accel~tance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such respection
may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to
conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery
of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt.
8. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 7, City may, at its option,
(I) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or umts
of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with
full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breactt In the event of such notice and election by City,
City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in
following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses.
9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the
Equipment tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the tin'ms and conditions of the Agreement on the original
tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may,
but is not required to, accept any substitute performance ~'otn Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the
original tender by Vendor.
10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials,
employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any
kind or nature which the City, its offieers,'ot~cials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death ofpetsom, or damage to property arising out of or from the Equipment or Vendor's
maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
11. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated heroin and
made a part hereof: (1) Request for Proposal dated December 28, 1998, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Vendor's
response to the Request for Proposal dated January 11, 1999, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract its conflicts with or is conlxadictory to any term
or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in t~s between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the
RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendoes Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the
Vendor's Response to the RFP.
12. Remedie~. The remedies and rights confeared on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with
all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity.
13. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the
parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.
14. Leeal Resl~onsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which
in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this AgreemenL
The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section.
2
15. Assilmment- This Agreement may no~ be assigned by Vendor without the express written consent of City. This
Agreement shall be binding on., and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal
representatives, successors and assigns.
16. Severability. If any provisic~ of this Agreement is hdd invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction,
it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and
binding on the parties.
17. Entire A!~reement; Modfficationl Waiver. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations
and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement
or the Contract Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the partie~ No waiver of any of the provisions
of this Agreement or the Contract Doctwnents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether
or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing
by the party making the waiver.
18. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other commtmications under this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be
given, or on the third business day after mailing ff mailed to the parly to whom notice is to be given, by first class mail,
registered or certified, postage prepaid, or on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight earner for
delivery the next business day, and properly addressed as follows:
To Vendor at: Sys Teclmology, Inc. To City at:
6481 Global Drive
Cypress, California 90630
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, California 92589
Attn: City Manager
Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new address
in the manner set forth above.
19. Effects of Headings. The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for
convcnienee only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions.
20. Governin!~ Law. This Agreement shall be coustmed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State
of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California.
////
IIII
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Approved As to Form:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Vendor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
ITEM 15
ORDINANCE NO. 99-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO ADD A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO. 2 (PDO-2) TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARGARITA
ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET EAST OF MORAGA
ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-370-004,
AND ADDING SECTION 17.22.110 THROUGH 17.22.118 TO
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY NO. 2 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0397.
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private
property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on December 2,
1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City
Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoning Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 921-370-004: change the Zoning designation
from High Density Residential (H) to Planned Development Overlay No. 2 (PDO-2).
Section 2. Planned Development Overlay No. 2 The City Council hereby adopts the
supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-2, Planned Development Overlay District
No. 2 as contained in Exhibit A of this ordinance.
Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
Ords 99-01 1
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords 99-01 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99-01was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th
day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords 99-01 3
ITEM 16
ORDINANCE NO. 99-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTI'ERFIELD
STAGE ROAD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 952-150-001 AND
952-150-003) CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION(S)
FROM HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMMERCIAL (HT), MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M), AND LOW MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (LM), TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private
property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November
4, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City
Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoning Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-001: change the Zoning designation
from Medium Density Residential (M) and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to Community
Commercial (CC).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 952-150-003: change the Zoning Designation
from Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT) to Community Commercial (CC).
Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99-02 was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th
day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 17
ORDINANCE NO. 99-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD SOUTH OF
THE INTERSECTION WITH RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-110-018, 019,
020, AND 032, AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.100 THROUGH
17.22.108 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 1 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0237)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private
property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on December
15, 1997, and December 2, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached
amendments to the City Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 1999
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendments To The City Zoninq Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as specified below:
A. For the parcels identified as APN 950-110-018, 019, and 032: change the Zoning
designation from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay No. I (PDO-1).
B. For the parcel identified as APN 950-110-020, change the Zoning Designation
from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Planned Development Overlay No. 1 (PDO-1).
Section 2. Planned Develol~ment Overlay No. 1 The City Council hereby adopts the
supplemental standards and requirements for PDO-1, Planned Development Overlay District
No. 1 as contained in Exhibit A of this ordinance.
R:/Ords99-03 1
Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information
contained in the Initial Environmental Study, finds that the impacts of the proposed amendments
are accurately described and discussed within the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the General Plan and that the FEIR accurately reflects the impacts of the amended General
Plan on City of Temecula and its surrounding areas.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Ords99-03 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE ) ss
CiTY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99-03 was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of January, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th
day of January, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Ords99-03 3
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DECEMBER 15, 1998
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called
to order at 7:40 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. President Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans,
Roberrs, and Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended
September 30, 1998.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARING
2 Tract Nos. 28553-1 and -2: Proposed Residential Street Lightin.cl Fee ('located
easterly of Mar.qarita Road - south of North General Kearney Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ORDERING, CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 29, '1999, FOR
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TRACT NOS. 28553-'1
AND 28553-2 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B
RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
'1999-00 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6, OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
2.2
Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the completion,
return, and tabulation of the ballots;
2.3
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant
to the aforementioned process.
Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (as per agenda material).
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve staffs recommendation including the
adoption of Resolution No. CSD 98-20. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Appointment of President and Vice President for the Year 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Appoint the President who will preside until the end of calendar year 1999
and appoint the Vice President who will assume the duties of the President
in the President's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar
year 1999.
MOTION: President Stone moved to appoint Director Comerchero as the District's
President for 1999. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to appoint Director Roberts as the District's Vice
President for 1999. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
4
Environmental Review of the Temecula Valley Hi.qh School Tennis Court
Lightinq Project
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Make a finding that the Temecula Valley High School Tennis Court
Lighting Project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301
of the CEQA guidelines and authorize staff to proceed with the project.
Community Services Director provided an overview of the staff report (of record), advising
that the project will go to bid in January; that the project should be awarded in February; and
that it should be completed by early Spring. Mr. Parker noted that the courts will be
available until 10:00 P.M. and that staff would coordinate the high school tennis schedule
with the School District to ensure no scheduling conflicts.
MOTION: Director Ford moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
In light of this being his last District meeting, General Manager Bradley reminisced on the
successes of the District and commended Community Services Director Parker and
associated staff on the passage of Measure C.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:49 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 12, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JANUARY 12, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:50 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
President Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs,
Stone, and Comerchero.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 8, 1998.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1. The
motion was seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker thanked the community for its support and participation
of the City's holiday festivities and invited the public to attend the upcoming Winchester
Creek Park dedication on Thursday, January 14, 1999, at 2:00 P.M.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
Acting City Manager Nelson commended the Community Services Department, staff, and
associated Departments on a job well done with the City's holiday festivities.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
Director Lindemans requested that the Christmas wreaths in Old Town be taken down.
Director Roberts noted that he and Director Stone have been meeting with the Library
Design Committee, advising that additional information will be provided at an upcoming City
Council meeting.
Director Stone advised that he and Director Lindemans had visited the Field of Dreams
ballpark in Cathedral City; advised that this impressive park was developed through a
public/private partnership; and suggested that the Community Services Commission visit
this facility in order to further explore its operations.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 26, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
2
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Board of Directors
-~.erman D. Parker,
January 26, 1999
Director of Community Services
SUBJECT:
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ,~.~ Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Edge Construction for $1.35
million, for the construction of Margarita Community Park. The park is currently in the 90-day
maintenance period. The Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities,
landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink; tennis courts, and ballfield
lighting. It is anticipated this park will be open to the public in Spring 1999.
On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Terra Cal Construction for
$601,000, for the construction of Winchester Creek Park. A dedication and ribbon cutting
ceremony was held on January 14, 1999. Winchester Creek Park is a 4.5 acre passive use park
consisting of a tot lot, picnic facilities, an outdoor basketball court, a sand volleyball court and
open turf areas.
On March 17, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement and
Scope of Services, in the amount of 855,000, with AMS Planning and Research, for the
preparation of a ten (10) year Cultural Arts Master Plan for the City of Temecula. The draft
plan has been distributed to project committee members for their review and comments. The
final document was presented to and approved by the Community Services Commission at the
December 14, 1998 Commission meeting. The draft plan will go forward to the City Council
in February 1999.
On May 12, 1998, Council awarded a design contract in the amount of 858,000 to LPA, Inc.,
to cover site selection, programming and site master planning for the Temecula Library.
The committee is currently meeting on a regular basis. Through a site selection process, the
consultant has identified a potential site for a central library and a community survey has also
been completed. Staff will be bringing forward a recommendation to the Community Services
Commission and the City Council in March of 1999.
R:~t~AGENDAS\dpt9901 January 14, 1999
The Margarita Sidewalk Project bid opening was held on October 29, 1998 and the City Council
awarded a construction contract to E.A. Mendoza on November 17, 1998. This project is
currently in the preliminary stages of construction. The improvements will include the
installation of concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road
between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. Additionally, an ADA access ramp from
Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields, and slope landscaping are included as part of the
project.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of
Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the
Temecula Valley High School Tennis Courts. The agreement was approved by the Board of
Education on August 18, 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting and maintenance of
eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of Temecula, in exchange for
the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation program. This project is
currently out to bid and bids are due in February. Because of the School District's schedule for
their tennis program and physical education tennis classes, construction is scheduled to begin
in May 1999.
The City Council awarded a construction contract to Terra Cal Construction for the Phase II
improvements to the Temecula Duck Pond. A pre-construction meeting was held on November
12, 1998 and this project is currently under construction. Staff anticipates the project will be
complete in 120 days. Improvements will include stabilization of the pond edge, walkways,
landscape, irrigation, bandstand, restroom, parking facilities, and road improvements to Ynez
Road.
The 1999 Winter/Spring "Guide to Leisure Activities" Recreation Brochure was mailed to
Temecula residents on January 9, 1999. The Community Services Department produces two
issues of the recreation brochure annually. Both issues advertise many of the recreation
programs, classes and special events offered by the City of Temecula, along with public
services announcements, a map of City park locations and important phone numbers to the
local youth sports programs.
R:~A~AGENDAS\dpt9901 January 14, 1999
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 15, t998
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to
order at 7:49 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California. Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Stone,
Roberrs, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended
September 30, 1998.
Approval of First Amendment to the Owner Participation Agreement between the
City of Temecula and International Rectifier Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO OWNER
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION, A
DELAWARE CORPORATION
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 2.
The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
AGENCY BUSINESS
3 Appointment of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for the Year 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Appoint the Chairperson who will preside until the end of calendar
year 1999 and appoint the Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties
of the Chairperson in the Chairperson's absence and will hold this
office until the end of calendar year 1999.
MOTION: Agency Member Roberrs reappointed current Chairman Lindemans to serve as
the Agency's Chairman for 1999. The motion was seconded by Agency Member
Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Agency Member stone appointed Agency Member Roberrs to serve as the
Agency's Vice Chairman for 1999. The motion was seconded by Agency Member
Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
In light of this being his last Agency meeting, Executive Director Bradley reminisced on the
Agency's successes including the International Rectifier Agreements and the Shopping Mall
and commended those associated with these projects.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
2
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:52 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 12, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JANUARY 12, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:50
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Lindemans presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Stone,
Roberrs, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 8, 1998.
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the City of Temecula for Construction
and Fundin.a of the Front Street Improvements - south of Rancho California Road
to Moreno Road - Project No. PW98-06
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City
of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for the
Front Street Improvements - south of Rancho California Road to Moreno
Road -Project No. PW98-06;
2.2
Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency
in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report;
2.3
Authorize the budgeted expenditure of $265,000.00 by the Redevelopment
Agency for the Agency's share of costs to date for the west side of Front
Street Improvements south of Rancho California Road to Moreno Road as
well as authorize the expenditure for future project costs incurred as
approved by the City or Agency.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 -
2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained with regard to Item No.
2.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Acting City Manager Nelson noted that staff would follow up on the removal of the Christmas
wreaths in Old Town and commended the Public Works Department on an outstanding job
with regard to administering the Old Town Streetscape improvements.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
Agency Member Stone recognized those Temecula Valley High School students in
attendance of this evening's meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:53 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 26, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
2
ITEM 2
APPROVA~
GEN, COUNSEL
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
EXECUTIVE DIR. .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Agency Members
Joseph Kjcak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 26, 1999
Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
for Construction and Funding of the Western Bypass Corridor -
Project No. PW95-07
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency Board:
Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of the
Western Bypass Corridor.
Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially the
form attached to the Agenda Report,
Authorize the budgeted expenditure of $877,602.26 by the Redevelopment Agency for the
Agency's share of costs to date for the construction and funding of the Western Bypass Corridor,
as well as authorize the expenditure for future project costs incurred as approved by the City or
Agency.
BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Improvement Plan includes construction of the
'^~ ...... "" ......"' ........Project No. PW95-07, This improvement is partially located within
and benefiting the Project Area of the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1. The
Agency's planning also calls for this Project to be completely funded by the Agency.
The Community Redevelopment Law, a Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the
planning, undertaking, construction, and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220
(b) and (c) specifically authorizes such cooperative agreements allowing a city and a
redevelopmerit agency to assist each other in the construction and installation of streets, roads,
water, sewer, or drainage facilities.
The Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically
authorizes the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the
Project Area.
r:\agdrpt%99\012&rdacoopbypaes/ajp
1
Completion of this Project will promote the goals of the redevelopment, as it will complete
necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement
Program. The Project will also induce private investment in and promote expansion of the
commercial areas served by this project within the Project Area through improved traffic
circulation and freeway access, and promote expansion of employment opportunities within the
commercial areas served by this project within the Project Area.
The attached "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of the Western Bypass Corridor -
Project No. PW95-07 will implement the funding plans of the City and the Agency.
FISCAL IMPACT: a total of $877,602.26 should be provided by the Agency to fund this agreement.
ATTACHMENT: Cooperative Agreement
r:\agdrpt\99\O126\rdacoopbypass/ajp
2
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS
CORRIDOR, PROJECT NO. PW95-07
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT made and effective as of January 26, 1999 by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate
and politic ("Agency"). In comideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set tbrth herein, the parties agree as fi311ows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the tbllowing facts and purposes, which each party finds and
determines to be true and correct:
a. The Community Redevelopment Law at Health and Safety Code Section 33220 authorizes and
encourages cities and redevelopment agencies to aid each other and to cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction,
and operations of redevelopment projects. Sections 33220 (b) and (c) specifically authorize such cooperative agreements
between a city and a redevelopment agency to assist each other in the construction of widening the southbound off-ramp at 1-15
and Winchester Road from Winchester Road north of Santa Gertrudis Creek bridge.
b. The Redevelopment Plan tbr the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 specifically authorizes
the expenditure of Agency funds on road construction within or benefiting the Project Area.
c. The Western Bypass Corridor, Project No. PW95-07 is a part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan
and is partially located within and benefiting the Project Area of Temecula Redevelopment Prqject Area 1988-1.
d. No other reasonable means of financing the improvements is available to the Community.
e. Completion of the Project will assist in the elimination of blight within the Project Area as it will
complete necessary public infrastructure improvements as detailed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan within the Project
Area, induce private investment in and promote expansion of the commercial areas served by the Western Bypass Corridor
within the Pro. ject Area through improved traffic circulation and freeway access, and promote expansion of employment
opportunities within the commercial areas served by the project within the Prqject Area, among others. No other reasonable
means of financing the improvements is available to the Community.
2. The City and the Agency agree to cooperate and share responsibility tbr the design and construction of the
Pro ect in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
3. The City shall undertake the following responsibilities with respect to the Project:
a. Prepare the necessary engineering and environmental studies for the Project;
b. design the necessary improvements tbr the Project;
c. acquire necessary rights-of-way tbr the Project;
d. prepare necessary plans, specifications and bid documents tbr the Project;
e. obtain all necessary permits and entitlements from other public agencies;
f. solicit bids and award construction contracts tbr the Project; and
g. administer the construction contracts.
R:\cip\projects\pw95\pw95-07\rdacoopagnnt/ajp
4. The Agency shall pay for all Project costs, except tBr such costs as the City is obligated to pay
pursuant to this Agreement. City shall pay the costs of acquiring the right-of-way for the Project, which costs
shall include the costs of title reports, appraisers, right--of-way agents, and attorneys. Agency shall, however,
reimburse City for its payments made for the value of the right-of-way acquired.
5. The City Manager, upon the recommendation of the Director of Finance, shall determine the
allocation of costs between the City and Agency pursuant to this Agreement and his or her determination shall
be final.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Attest:
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC, Agency Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney/Agency General Counsel
2 R:\cip\projecl.s\pw95\pw95-07\rdacoopagrmt/ajp
ITEM 3
APPROVAN~/~
CITY
ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Agency Members
Janua~ 26,1999
Acquisition of Tax-Defaulted Property for Affordable Housing
Prepared By: Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC SALE OF
CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE
PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES
BACKGROUND:
We have received notice from the County of Riverside Office of the Treasurer-Tax Collector that
APN 922-054-011-6 (28613 Pujol Street) and APN 922-053-013-5 (the 28500-600 Block of
Pujol Street) are in tax default. The parcels of land are owned by the same individual. The
attached resolution objects to the sale of both parcels at public auction. This action does not
interfere in any way with the property owner's ability to cure the tax default. Rather, this action
places the Agency in first position should the property owner not redeem the property. The
Agency would use the property to develop affordable housing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County has established a minimum purchase price for APN 922-054-011-6 of $4,043.77
and a minimum price for APN 922-053-013-5 of $11,490.46. Additional costs to process this
request are $620.00 to pay for publication of the legal notice and lot book reports required by
the County. Adequate funds are available.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution
R:powersj~staffreports\Henning.Acquis 1
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO
PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY
LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF TEM ECULA, OFFERING TO
PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND STATING THE PUBLIC
PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE PROPERTY IS TO BE DEVOTED
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has determined that certain tax-defaulted parcels of
property is within the City of Temecula and the City desires to purchase said parcel for public
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector has determined the
purchase price for which such parcels may be acquired by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City does hereby object to the sale of two parcels of land, located in
the City of Temecula and described below:
Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-053-013-5
2.63 acres
Legal Description: See attached Exhibit A
Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-054-011-6
Also known as 28613 Pujol Street
.52 acre
Legal Description: Lot 4 BIk 36, Town of Temecula
The purchase price of APN 922-053-013-5 established by the Riverside County
Treasurer and Tax Collector, pursuant to the Tax Collector's Power of Sale is $11,490.46 and
the purchase price of $4,043.77 for APN 922-054-011-6.
Section 2. The City of Temecula does hereby offer to purchase this parcel of land
identified in Section 1 above, from the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector pursuant
to the provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, Chapter 8, Section 3371, et al.
In such forms as the Riverside County and Tax Collector shall specify.
Section 3. The City hereby certifies to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax
Collector that the public purpose for which the parcel of land will be devoted is as follows:
Affordable Housing
Section4. The Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency is hereby
authorized to execute any and all such Chapter 8 Agreements for Sale to carry out the purposes
of this Resolution, and to forthwith pay to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector, the
full purchase price therefore, as specified in Section 1, together with all costs of giving notice
pursuant to statute, in full recognition that such costs are in addition to, and not included within
the purchase price. In addition, the City agrees to pay publication costs incurred even if the
r:'~,powers. j~resolutions. defaultprop
property is redeemed, and therefore not conveyed to the City, and to pay the full costs of Lot
Book Reports, which City further recognizes to be non-refundable fees.
Section 5. The City Manager is further authorized to execute any and all other
documents, agreements and certifications required or desirable to consummate the purchase
contemplated hereunder.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency this __ day of ,1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the
__ day of , 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
r:\power~jXresolutions.del~attltprop
EXHIBIT A
The Northwesterly 255 feet of the following described property:
The Northwesterly one-half of that tract of land formerly used as a railroad right of way and
station ground of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company, conveyed to N. R.
Veil, et al, by Deed recorded June 11, 1940 in Book 464 page 505 of Official Records, in the
office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California, said property being
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most Southerly comer of Lot 1, Block 27 as shown by map on file in Book 15
page 726 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of
California; thence Southwesterly in a straight line to the most Easterly comer of Lot 1, Block 36,
as shown by said map; thence Northwesterly in a straight line to the most Northerly corner of
Lot 10, Block 37, as shown by said map; thence Northeasterly on a straight line to the Most
Westerly corner of Lot 22, Block 25 on said map; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to the
point of the beginning;
EXCEPTING therefrom the Northwesterly 595 feet thereof;
ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom those portions included in River and Pujol Streets as shown on
said map.
r:\powersjXresolutions.defaultprop
ITEM
APPROVA~~/~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
January 26, 1999
Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance Programs (First Time Homebuyer
and Employee Relocation)
Prepared By:
Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst '~,)t~
2,
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Amend the First Time Homebuyer Program Parameters (Attachment 1) eliminating the
$120,000 purchase price ceiling and allowing the purchase price to be limited only by the
applicant's ability to qualify for financing while meeting income eligibility requirements.
Approve the attached Program Parameters (Attachment 2) for the proposed Employee
Relocation Program.
BACKGROUND:
The First Time Homebuyer Program was adopted in June, 1996, to further the affordable
housing goals of the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan. The Program was designed to
enhance affordable housing opportunities to residents of low to moderate income and to
stabilize neighborhoods by increasing rates of homeownership. Generally, downpayment
assistance programs are developed to bridge the gap between the cost of housing affordable to
persons of low to moderate income and the cost of housing in the local community.
Since its adoption, 47 families of low and median income have been assisted through the First
Time Homebuyer Program. In 1996, the average purchase price was approximately $95,000
(including condominiums) and the average loan amount was $18,833. Eleven assistance loans
were made during the 1998 calendar year; the average purchase price for 1998 was $106,000
(including condominiums) and the average loan amount was $20,087. Sales prices for single-
family homes only during 1998 averaged $112,000.
Currently, local realtors and lenders estimate that there are just approximately five single-family
homes for sale in the City priced under $120,000. These statistical observations indicate a
change in the $120,000 purchase price ceiling is needed to increase the supply of affordable
housing available to low to moderate income homebuyers. Elimination of the price ceiling will
allow income-eligible buyers to purchase a home based on their ability to repay the debt rather
than imposing a price limit that restricts housing availability.
The Employee Relocation Program's downpayment assistance loan is proposed as an
Economic Development incentive. The Program is designed to assist families of low to
moderate income with the acquisition of an affordable home within the City subsequent to their
relocation by an employer approved for program participation. Employers will be evaluated for
participation on a case by case basis. Criteria will include, but is not limited to, the number of
new jobs created for local hire and the size of the business. Funding available to each
employer will also be evaluated in the same manner. Expansion of existing businesses, which
will create new jobs, may also be considered for program participation. There will be no
requirement that the applicant be a first time homebuyer.
The eligible relocation borrower must have an annual household gross income, which does not
exceed the moderate income established by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development for the Riverside/San Bernardino Area, adjusted for family size. The eligible
income limits are listed in the proposed Program Parameters. The borrower will be required to
contribute a minimum of 3% of the purchase price toward the acquisition of their home as with
the First Time Homebuyer Program.
The purchase price of the home will be limited only by the applicant's ability to qualify for
financing. The downpayment assistance loan may also include closing costs as long as total
assistance does not exceed 10% of the purchase price, up to a maximum of $15,000. No
payments will be required for the first five years; for the remaining 25 years of the 30-year term,
repayment of the assistance loan, at the Prime Rate of simple interest, will be fully amortized.
If approved, the Employee Relocation Program will be available city-wide for new and resale
homes which are on a permanent foundation. Single-family homes, condominiums, and
townhouses are eligible. Although the homebuyer need not be a first time buyer, the home
purchased under this program must be the Recipient's primary residence.
The recommendations of staff are made to further the goals and objectives of the City related to
enhancing affordable housing opportunities for families of low to moderate income and
neighborhood preservation and stabilization. The program information presented has been
reviewed by the members of the Economic Development Subcommittee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The First Time Homebuyer Program is funded by Redevelopment Agency's Low to Moderate
Housing Setaside Fund. The FY 1998-99 budget for this program is $400,000 (account number
165-199-999-5449). Adequate funds are available.
The proposed Employee Relocation Program would also be funded by the Agency's Housing
Setaside. The FY 1998-99 budget is $200,000 (account number 165-199-999-5448).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. First Time Homebuyer Program Parameters
2. Employee Relocation Downpayment Assistance Program Parameters
R:powersj~staffreports\homebuyerl -99 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROGRAM PAREMETERS
FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER PROGRAM
R:powersjLstaffreports\homebuyerl -99
CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRST TIME BUYER PROGRAM
What is the First Time Buyer Down Payment Program (FTHB)? The City of Temecula FTHB
Program is designed to provide assistance to lower income persons in the purchase of their first
home. Assistance may be provided for a portion of the down payment and/or closing costs
associated with the purchase of a home. The amount of assistance available depends upon the
buyers qualifications and the price of the home. The maximum amount of assistance is twenty
percent (20%) of the purchase price plus closing costs, up to a total payout of $24,000.
Who qualifies for the FTHB Program? The three basic qualifications for the FTHB Program
are: (1) the buyer must be a first time homebuyer; (2) the buyers annual income must not
exceed the area median income; and, (3) the home being purchased must be located in a
qualifying location.
What is a first time homebuyer? In order to qualify as a first time homebuyer, the purchaser
cannot have owned a home for the previous three years from the date of application to the
FTHB. The purchaser must sign a swom application attesting that they have not owned a
home. In addition, the last three years tax returns will be reviewed to ascertain that no
mortgage interest or real estate tax deductions have been claimed. For the purposes of
determining home ownership, a dwelling unit that was not permanently affixed to a permanent
foundation (i.e., a mobile home) shall not be included in the three-year requirement.
What are the qualifying incomes? In order to be eligible for this program, the buyers annual
income shall not exceed the area median income, as determined by HUD, adjusted for family
size. In addition, assets shall not exceed these limits. The 1998 income limits are as follows:
FAMILY SIZE
I Persons
2 Persons
3 Persons
4 Persons
5 Persons
6 Persons
7 persons
8 Persons
MEDIAN ANNUAL
INCOME
$ 32 550
$ 37 200
$ 41 850
$ 46 500
$ 50 200
$ 53 950
$ 57 650
$ 61 400
Figures are per the Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing
Policy Department, Riverside County and are adjusted annually.
What are the other buyer requirements? The buyer must have sufficient income and
creditworthiness to qualify for a first mortgage through one of the Participating Lenders. In
addition, the buyer must provide a minimum of three percent (3%) of the purchase price as a
down payment from their own funds and must accept the highest loan-to-value ratio first loan for
which they qualify. For example, to purchase a home costing $100,000, the buyer must
contribute $3,000 toward the down payment.
What is the maximum home price? The purchase price of the home is limited only by the
applicant's ability to qualify for financing. The purchase price shall not exceed the fair market
value indicated by a property appraisal.
What kinds of properties are eligible? The FTHB program may be used to purchase any new
or resale home that is: (1) permanently fixed to a permanent foundation, (2) has a minimum of
two bedrooms, and (3) is currently occupied by the Seller or vacant (tenant-occupied homes are
not eligible.) The purchaser must reside in the home as his or her principal residence within
sixty (60) days of purchase and the home shall not be used as a business nor as a vacation
(second) home.
The home must be in sound condition and meet both Housing Quality Standards as determined
by the RDA and applicable Building and Safety standards; it must also be suitable for
occupancy upon purchase. Furthermore, the borrower shall agree to maintain the home in good
condition for the term of the RDA assistance. To this end, the purchaser shall be required to
obtain a one-year home warranty as part of the home purchase. The costs of the home
warranty are eligible for financial assistance under the FTHB program.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROGRAM PARAMETERS
EMPLOYEE RELOCATION PROGRAM
R:powersj~staffreports\homebuyerl -99
CITY OF TEMECULA
EMPLOYEE RELOCATION PROGRAM
The Employee Relocation Program is designed to assist families, with their home purchase, who are
moving to the City of Temecula due to relocation of their Employer. The City of Temecula offers a
second trust deed loan of up to 10% of the purchase price, but not to exceed $15,000. The City's
assistance loan benefits families by providing them with a downpayment for which they do not have to
make monthly payments during the first five years.
To be eligible, the Applicant must be employed with a company that has been approved by the City of
Temecula to participate in the Program. The companies include those that have recently expanded or
relocated to the City. In addition, the Applicant's gross annual household income must be below the
following limits according to their family size:
Household Members Income Limit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
$39,050
$44 650
$50 200
$55 800
$60 250
$64 750
$69 200
8 or more $73.650
*The income limits are 120% of the area median income and are subject to change annually.
Loan Terms:
This is a 30-year second mortgage loan. Repayment terms are as follows:
For the first 5 years, there are no payments required on the downpayment assistance.
For the remaining 25 years, repayment of the assistance loan, at the Prime Rate of simple
interest, is fully amortized and collected in 300 equal monthly payments. The Prime Rate will be
that which is place at the time the loan is approved or the rate which is in effect on the date
payments commence in year 6, whichever is lower.
Purchase Price: The purchase price of the home is limited only by the applicanrs ability to qualify for
financing.
BuVer's Investment: The buyer must contribute a minimum of 3% of the purchase price toward the
acquisition of their home.
Allowable Assets: The buyer's family assets (excluding personal property and funds in restricted
retirement accounts) remaining after close of escrow may not exceed a 12 month housing expense
(PITI) reserve.
Closing Costs: Closing costs may be paid by the downpayment assistance loan as long as total
assistance does not exceed $15,000.
Eli.qible Properties: The Program is available for new and resale properties city-wide. Single family
homes, condominiums, and townhouses, which are either vacant or owner-occupied, are eligible. The
home must be in sound condition and meet Housing Quality Standards as determined by the RDA.
Although the homebuyer need not be a first time buyer, the home purchased under this program must
be the Recipienrs primary residence.
Availability of Downpayment Assistance: Program assistance is available to eligible applicants for up
to one year after the date of the approved employer's relocation or expansion, as long as program
funds are available.
First Mortgage Lender: Any lender previously approved by the City may participate in the Program.
The participating lender must accept the City's loan application concurrently with their application and
is responsible for all loan processing.
Future Refinancin.q: The City will subordinate the assistance loan, second to a new first mortgage,
only if no cash is taken out during the refinance transaction.
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL ~
EXECUTIVE DIRECT
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager.~-?V1
January 26, 1998
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of January 26, 1998 for the Redevelopment
Department.
This report covers Housing and Redevelopment.
HOUSING
First Time Homebuyers Program
Funding in the amount of $400,000 is available for FY 98-99. 11 Loans have been closed for
$220,960 with I loan pending.
Residential Improvement Programs
As of January 1998 to date, 25 projects have been completed and 12 are in process. The majority
of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement.
Affordable Rental Housing Projects
Agency staff has the responsibility for monitoring all projects obtaining Agency assistance to
rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing as well as new construction. After completion, annual
reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income criteria outlined in the Project
Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. During
January, a 30-unit project, Rancho Creek Apartments, is under review, which also includes a
maintenance inspection.
North Pujol RedeveloDment Project
The Affirmed Housing Group has received development plan approval to rehabilitate 38 existing units
and build 38 new 3-bedroom units. The project is currently in plan check.
OLD TOWN
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Projects
Completion of the Streetscape improvement project is nearly complete. All major improvements
have been installed and only minor "tie backs" and some detail work remains to be completed.
The sound system is operational and the gateway arches have been installed.
Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Sign Program
The following facade improvement/sign projects are completed:
· Temecula Creek Plaza (southwest corner of Sixth and Front)
- Repair and Paint
· The Bank Restaurant (Front and Main ) - Paint
· Long Branch Antiques (Formerly NAPA Auto Pads)
- Facade Renovation
· Serendipity (Main Street)
- New front brick entry area
· Gary Denny Insurance (Sixth Street)
- New quartz stone front entry area
· Express Bodicare (new business on Front Street)
- New signs only
The following facade improvement applications are being processed:
· Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) - Complete Facade Renovation
· Rancon Building (Front Street)
- Repaint Trim
· Musicians Workshop (Mercedes)
- New handicap parking and restroom facilities, new front windows and front entry door
· Kreigers General Store (Mercedes)
-New exterior facade and handicap restroom facilities
PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS
The City closed escrow on the Mercantile Building on December 31, 1998. Staff is pursuing
designation as a Point of Historical Interest through the State Office of Historic Preservation.
R :\syersk\monthly\report.Jan
ITEM 18
CITY MANAGER (~~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
January 26,1999
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of Planning Application No. PA98-0347
(Development Plan) - The design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two
parcels consisting of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping.
On the west side of Commerce Center Drive, adjacent to Murrieta Creek, north of
Via Montezuma.
Prepared by:
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AFFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-
0347 DEVELOPMENT PLAN - THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF 15 SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL,
MANUFACTURING, OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 81,885
SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON TWO PARCELS CONSISTING OF
6.02 ACRES WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COMMERCE CENTER
DRIVE, ADJACENT TO MURRIETA CREEK, NORTH OF VIA
MONTEZUMA, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.S 921-
400-017 AND 921.400-044.
BACKGROUND: A pre-application meeting was held on May 18, 1998 and a formal application
was submitted on August 19, 1998. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held
on September 10, 1998, with staff providing written comments on September 17, 1998. The project
was deemed complete on October 26, 1998. The application was heard at the November 18, 1998
Planning Commission headng. The Planning Commission unanimously denied the project (4-0 with
Commissioner Soltysiak absent) citing that the proposed land development was not designed for
the protection of the public health, safety and welfare, and that the proposed project was not in total
conformance with the City's adopted Design Guidelines due to the interior fencing and gating that
was added to the project after staffs review.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pag8CC.doc
1
DISCUSSION: The proposed project is for the design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two parcels
consisting of 6.02 acres with associated improvements, such as hardscape, parking, landscaping
and drive aisles.
After the project was scheduled for public hearing, the applicant added fencing and gating to create
secured storage and parking areas; therefore, staff was unable to comment on the fences/storage
areas during the review process. When the additional fences and gates were added to the plans,
staff stated that there would not be support for the additional fences and gates because they would
remove common parking that was required for the approval of the project; impede internal
circulation and access; and become unsightly outdoor storage areas for old or used parts,
equipment or vehicles.
The Planning Commission agreed with staff's position regarding the gates and fences, and also
expressed concern with the proposed landscaping due to the applicant counting the landscaping
on the east slope as part of the 20 percent minimum landscaping requirement. The Planning
Commission stated that the landscaping provided on site (not including the slope area) was minimal
and did not meet the intent of the Development Code landscaping requirement. Prior to the
Planning Commission voting on the project, the applicant did offer to add an additional five (5') feet
of landscaping at the front of the project to increase the total landscaped area outside of the slope
area.
The applicant was not willing to remove the internal fencing and gating, stating that the type of
tenant being targeted for this development would require secured parking. The Planning
Commission denied the project making the following findings: the proposed project interior fencing
and gating unreasonably segregates the buildings; removes the required common parking
necessary for the proposed development; creates opportunities for trash debris to gather in an
unsanitary manner; causes foreseeable interference with public safety service responses; and the
landscaping design and quantity is inadequate given the proposed site layout.
Appeal to the City Council
An appeal to the City Council was filed December 4, 1998 by the applicant's representative (see
Attachment 2). The appeal refutes the Planning Commissions findings of denial and states the
following:
The project will ultimately be subdivided into individual building pads, with all driveways,
parking and landscaping owned in common by a governing property owners association
which will maintain the common areas, but the parking will be dedicated to each specific
building with no common parking. The areas outside of the gates/fences will provide for the
parking allocation for the office portion of the building and provide visitor parking.
Additionally, the gates could be left open or detector loops or call box response
mechanisms could be installed.
The trash accumulation could be handled by a condition of approval requiring no trash
accumulation on site.
The applicant's proposal to utilize riparian plantings on the east side of Murrieta Creek slope
is consistent the General Plan.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC .doc
2
Staff's Response
In response to the appeal, whether the building pads are subdivided at a later date does not
eliminate the requirement to provide adequate parking that is available for employees, the public,
customers, deliveries, etc. The Development Code does not allow buildings to provide parking for
only the office area of a structure, but requires parking for all uses of the buildings. The Planning
Commission concluded that the gates and fences would impede overall circulation throughout the
site, remove the required parking necessary for this development and become unsightly storage
areas·
In terms of the recommended condition of approval for trash control, it is staff's opinion that placing
a condition of approval on a project would not prevent trash from accumulating on the site.
Specifically, if the parking area is owned in common or even "dedicated" to a building, the owners
or tenants may not feel responsible for maintaining the parking area around their building. Based
on similar developments, staff feels that this type of arrangement does not result in an acceptable
level of clean-up or maintenance. In addition, business owner's association are often off-site and
are not aware of the daily operations or maintenance needs of the common areas.
In reference to the landscaping of Murrieta Creek, the east side of the slope is owned by the
applicant and not Riverside County Flood Control. Staff allowed the applicant to include the
landscaping on the east slope as part of the 20 percent minimum landscaping requirement provided
the landscaping is native species and is approved by the California Department of Fish and Game.
It was not the revegetation of the slope that the Planning Commission opposed, but the lack of
landscaping provided on the site outside of the slope area.
SPECIFIC ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 99-__ denying Planning Application No. PA98-0347;
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
City Council Resolution - Page 4
Planning Commission Resolution of Denial (Reso. No. 98-049) - Page 8
Appeal Application - Page 9
Minutes of the Planning Commission Hearing of November 18, 1998 - Page 10
Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 18, 1998 - Page 11
Exhibits
a. Site Plan
b. Floor Plans
c. Elevations
d. Conceptual Grading Plan
e. Landscape Plan
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC .doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. gg-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AFFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-
0347 DEVELOPMENT PLAN - THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF 15 SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL,
MANUFACTURING, OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 81,885
SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON TWO PARCELS CONSISTING OF
6.02 ACRES WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE,
ADJACENT TO MURRIETA CREEK, NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921400-017 AND 921-
400-044.
WHEREAS, Saddleback filed Planning Application No. PA98-0347, in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0347, was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0347 on
November 18, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to
this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission adopted a resolution denying of Planning Application No. PA98-0347
(Resolution No. 98-049);
WHEREAS, Saddleback filed an appeal to Planning Application No. PA98-0347, in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, January 26, 1999, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to
Planning Application No. 98-0347 on November 18, 1998, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to, and did testify either in suppod or opposition to Planning Application No. PA98-0347;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA98-0347;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That City Council, in affirming the action of the Planning
Commission, regarding Planning Application No. PA98-0347 (Development Plan) hereby affirms and
adopts Resolution 98-049 including the findings set forth therein;
A. The proposed use is not in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City.
\XTEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
5
B. The proposed overall development of the land is not designed for the protection of
the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed project interior fencing and gating unreasonably
segregates the buildings; removes the required common parking necessary for the proposed
development; creates opportunities for trash debris to gather in an unsanitary manner; and causes
foreseeable interference with public safety service responses. The landscaping design and quantity
is inadequate given the proposed site layout.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. No environmental compliance determination was
made by the Planning Commission based upon its decision to deny Planning Application No. PA98-
0347 (Development Plan) and this City Council makes no determination under the California
Environmental Quality Act as amended by this action.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby denies Planning
Application No. PA98-0347 (Development Plan) for the design, construction and operation of 15
speculative industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two
parcels consisting of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping, and known as Assessor's
Parcel No.s 921-400-017 and 921-400-044 for the reasons and upon the determinations set forth
herein.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
\\TEMEC_FS201 \DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
6
Section 5. PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th
day of January, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 199_, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
OF DENIAL (NO. 98-049)
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
8
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DENING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-
0347 THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF 15
SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING/OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 81,885 SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON
TWO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 6.02 ACRES WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, ADJACENT
TO MURRIETA CREEK, NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA, KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-400-017 AND 921-400-044.
WHEREAS, Saddleback filed Planning Application No. PA98-0347 in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0347 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0347 on
November 18, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA98-0347;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in denying Planning Application No.
PA98-0347 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The proposed overall development of the land is not designed for the
protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed project interior fencing and gating
unreasonably segregates the buildings; removes the required common parking necessary for the
proposed development; creates opportunities for trash debris to gather in an unsanitary manner;
and causes foreseeable inference with public safety service responses. The landscaping design
and quantity is inadequate given the proposed site layout,
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc4.doc
8
C. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native species
of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site
serves as a migration corridor.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. No environmental compliance determination was
made by the Planning Commission based upon its decision to deny the Development Plan.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby denies
Planning Application No. PA98-0347 for the design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two parcels
consisting of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping, and known as Assessor's Parcel
No. 921-400-017 and 921-400-044 for the reasons and upon the determinations set forth herein.
Section 5. DENIED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY OERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting there of, held on the 18th day of
November, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Naggar, Guerriero
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: 0
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Soltysiak
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc4. doc
9
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
APPEAL MEMORANDUM
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
9
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula · CA · 92590
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula · CA · 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 * FAX (909) 694-6477
Appeal
Original Case Number(s)
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or
dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or
enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code.
B. FII.ING REQUIREMENTS
1. Development Application.
2. Appeal Form.
3. Filing Fee.
C. NOTICE OF APPEAI. - TIME I,I1VIIT
A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by
him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be
acted upon unless filed within fifteen (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision.
D. NOTICE OF APPEAl, - CONTFNTS
Appealing the decision of:
(Specify Director of Planning or Planning Commission X~D Action Date)
Specify exac~y what is being appealed: I~LA~t~X,~ Co~mtc~tQ~4 D~'~,ltA,,C- oF
CAS~-
R:\FAGJ~/{~I~1~ppLIC\APP.~PP 7/16/97 klb
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477
Date Stamp
DE VELOPMENT APPLICATION
PROJECT INFORMATION:
(LNCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS CANNOT BE ACCEPTED) ..
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).
PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
STREET ADDRESS
q'7,(- qoo - ot'-l/o
Type of Review Requested:
[]
[]
[]
[]
O
[]
[]
[]
[]
O
[]
Annexation (AF)
Appeal
CEQA
Conditional Use Permit
[] Existing Building (MCUP)
[] New Building (In addition, check appropriate Development Plan) (CUP)
Development Agreement (DA)
Development Plan
[] Over 10,000 square feet, subject to CEQA (PPN)
[] Under 10,000 square feet, subject to CEQA (PP)
[] Under 10,000 square feet, not subject to CEQA (PPA)
[] Subdivision - Home Product
Extension of Time for Planning Application No.
General Plan Amendment (GPAS)
Minor Exception (PP2)
Specific Plan (SP)
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Tract Map
Variance (VAR)
Zoning Amendment - Text or Map Change, Specific Plan Amedment (CZ)
Other:
R:\FORMS\APPLFORM.WPD 6/12/98 klb
II
APPLICANT
APPLICANT/REPRESENTA TIVE/O WNER INFORMATION
~ ,A'vO cee Af.~
PHONE NO. "l [ ~ - 5 q (~ - "/Ca C),~ FAX NO.
ADDRESS '~,,9-~6)Y,,. 1] ~6I f~VtM~ l CA--~
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
REPRF~ENTATIVE D~/~14~'~ fin40 AzJ~O QX'te_,,,~ CONTACT [.jCP, f.,q
LAST FIRST MI.
PHONE NO. (fi'~Co -Gfe"I'L- FAX NO.
ADDRESS d['~(::) t-AJlt~C,~ ~ pJ2)I 5'r~. ]q T"C--W[e.6ULA"'
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
OWNER ~ A-m~-- A'5/h° O
LAST
CONTACT
LAST FIRST MI.
FIRST MI.
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
ADDRESS
Project Information:
Project Description/Use:
Project Location: C-o-mm~ Ce,~&7-e¢- DI2-.
Application Type:
Code
General Plan:
Res. Use Type:
Gross Acres:
C o"raml.eet e~4
(Office Use Only)
# Units:
# of Lots:
Added Gross Acres:
Overall Project Square Footage:
Related Cases:
Proposed Project Phasing:
Estimated Number of Employees Per Shift:
Number of Lot/Units:
# Added Units:
# Added Lots:
Owner Certification
I certify that I am presently the legal owner or the authorized agent for the above-described property.
acknowledge the fding o -this application and certify that all of the above information is true and accurate.
Signature: : ' /,,' Date:
Print Nametb~ ~A4-KHA-~rt/hJO
I
Agent of the owner must attach a letter of authorization from the legal owner
R:\FORMS\APPLFORM.WPD 6/12/98 klb 2
Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue which
the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of every item
of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary).
Desired action to be taken:
In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then
the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant
shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to refile the notice of appeal.
Ia.:\FAGI:~PPLIC',.APP.APP 7/16/97 k3.b 2
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
Development Consultants
0 4 1998
REASON OR JUSTIFICATION TO SUPPORT THE APPEAL
The Planning Commission Finding A. of the Resolution makes the finding that the Project is in
conformance with the General Plan and all other Ordinances of the City, yet Finding B. finds that
the Project does not protect the public health, safety and welfare, by means of the proposed
interior fencing and gating. Furthermore, the Finding B. states that the fencing will segregate the
common parking and provide opportunities for trash accumulation and interfere with public
safety responses.
In response, this project will ultimately be subdivided into individual building pads, with all
driveways, parking and landscaping owned in common by a governing property owners
association which will maintain the common areas, but the parking will be dedicated to each
specific building with no common parking. This provides a further safeguard regarding staffs
concern. The areas outside of the gate/fence areas will provide for the parking allocation for the
office portion of the building, and will thus provide visitor parking. Additionally, the gates could
be left open or install detector loops or install call box response opening mechanisms.
The proposed fences and gates provide Knox Box entry features consistent with Fire Condition
//80. The issue of trash accumulation should be handled by means of an additional Condition of
Approval to append to Condition 5 e. ("Trash shall not be allowed to accumulate within any area
of the site"). Lastly, the contention that the landscaping design and quantity is inadequate also
flies in the face of the original staff report. I have taken the liberty to attach the General Plan
excerpt dealing with Murrieta Creek that is consistent with the Applicant's proposal to utilize
riparian planrings along the Murrieta Creek slope.
The Applicant offered to reduce the building size, further increase the landscape area and
enhance the planting sizes, but was rebuffed by the Commission. All of these arguments fell on
deaf ears as the Commission chose to make an arbitrary and capricious decision to deny a project
by stating they "did not like," and that the "buildings were too small." This is contrary to the fact
that this size incubator industrial space is desperately needed in the City of Temecula for
beginning entrepreneurs.
Our potential tenants (list to be supplied) need the secured parking areas for survey, electrician
and plumbing contractor trucks as an example. These types of businesses cannot afford to
lease/purchase a building large enough to store vehicles inside.
The Applicant requests the Counci!'s approval of the Appeal, and the deletion of that
portion of Condition 5 e. dealing with the fences.
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N · Temecula, California 92590-4898 · (909) 676-6672 · FAX (909) 699-1848
CITY OF 'IF_dMECI, E~ Open Space/Conservation Element
Policy 1.9
Policy 1.10
Policy 1.11
Policy 1.12
Coordinate long range park and open space planning with Riverside
County and the City of Murrieta.
Maximize pedestrian and bicycle am to existing and new parks as an
alternative to automobile access.
Encourage joint recreational use between school and park facilities when
appropriate.
Consider the establishment of development impact fees to cover the cost
of capital improvements for parks and recreation facilities needed to serve
new development.
Goal 2
Conservation and protection of surface water, groundwater and imported
water resources.
Discussion
As the General Plan Study Area builds-out over the next 20 to 40 years, the
impact on water resources and water quality may be significant. The protection
of waterways within the community, particularly the Temecula, Pechanga and
Murrieta Creeks, and the Santa Margarita River, not only provides for recreation
and scenic enjoyment, but also conserves sensitive plant and animals species. In
addition, given Temecula's reliance on groundwater as a water supply for the
community, it is important to ensure that recharge areas are protected and that
water conservation measures are implemented to reduce the City's dependence on
imported water.
Policy
2.1
Coordinate with the Riverside County Flood Control District to design
flood control improvements for Murrieta Creek and Temecula Creek that
preserve the important natural features and resources of the local creeks
and the riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River, to the maximum
extent feasible.
Policy 2.2
Identify and protect groundwater resources from depletion and sources of
.pollution in cooperation with the Raneho California Water District.
Policy 2.3
Conserve potable water by requiring water conservation techniques in all
new development.
Policy 2.4
Use reclaimed water for the irrigation of parks, golf courses, publicly
landscaped areas and other feasible applications as service becomes
available from RCWD and EMWD.
TEM-01X05GP-OPN.SPA * Date: November 9, 1993 Page 5-26
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 18, 1998
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
10
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 18, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, November 18,
1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Naggar, Webster, and Chairwoman Slaven.
Absent:
Commissioner Soltysiak.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Senior Engineer Alegria,
Attorney Cudey,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Assistant Planner Anders,
Project Planner DeGange, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
2. Fire Department Presentation on "Hazardous Materials"
Mr. Howard Windsor, Chief Fire Marshall, addressed hazardous materials, advising that the disclosure as to the storage,
use, and handling of such materials was the most vital issue, to ensure safety in facilities; and noted that the Fire
Department has developed a hazardous material disclosure packet.
Mr. Doug Meyers, representing the Fire Department, presented an overview of the Fire Department's Hazardous Materials
Chemical Classification and Quantification Packet developed to review the classification of hazardous materials; noted the
rationale for the use of such regulations as the minimizing of: emergency response sources and time, property damage,
exposure, injury and death, and monetary loss; in detail, specified the disclosable amounts of hazardous matedal regulated
by the Fire Code; and clarified, for Chairwoman Slaven, the three differentials in amounts of hazardous materials related
to disclosure, exempt, and permitted amounts.
Fire Marshall Windsor advised, for Chairwoman Slaven, that although the Fire Department does currently have an annual
inspection program, there is no existing permit program, noting that the Fire Department is working on implementing this
program for use in approximately two years, advising that the delay is due to the lack of staff and monetan/provision. For
Commissioner Naggar, he noted that the Hazardous Material Team, interfacing with other City, State, and Federal
agencies would have the capability of handling a hazardous material emergency; advised that Code Enforcement, in a joint
effort with the City of Murrieta, provides hazardous material for the public; and noted that the most efficient tool to appdse
the business community of such materials is by way of educational programs.
Commissioner Guerdero recommended a provision to specify where the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) book would
be kept in each facility; and requested that staff get a copy of the SEMS policy for Commission review.
Commissioner Naggar relayed to Fire Marshall Windsor his support of the Fire Departmenrs efforts with regard to
hazardous materials.
It was the consensus of the Commission to recommend that the City Council investigate opportunities to assist the Fire
Department in expediting the peruhitting program since it has been determined that is the most efficient tool in monitoring
hazardous materials.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Plannin.q Application NO. PA98-0410 (Development Plan)
Request to design, construct and operate of two (2)industrial buildings, 20,385 square feet and 17,720
square feet respectively, on properties zoned LI {Light Industrial).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the requesL
Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (per agenda material), highlighting access, landscaping, and architecture;
commended the applicant on their cooperative efforts with Planning Staff; noted, for Commissioner Guerriere, regarding
Item No. 9 (on page 29 of the staff report), specifically, hazardous materials, that the Fire Department has reviewed the
project for its impact as to hazards rendering a condition of no negative impact, advising that he would investigate further
as to whether or not the Fire Department utilized the new Hazardous Materials Disclosure Packet for review of this project;
for Commissioner Naggar, noted that the provision of additional information regarding the specific hazardous material
disclosure utilized for review for buildings that are not speculative could be added to the staff report; and advised, for
Chairwoman Slaven, regarding Condition No. 5 (regulating the storage of material) provides for flexibility due to one of
the buildings being speculative in order to allow staff to address outside storage if needed at a future point in time.
Mr. Scott Buckles, representing Dekkon Development, Inc., representing the applicant, complimented staff for their diligent
work on this project.
Mr. Gary Baker, the applicant, addressed the hazardous materials issue, noting that the specifications of the labeling and
maintenance program maintained on the facility was facilitated by CAL OSHA six years ago; and noted, for Chairwoman
Slaven, that the building they will occupy will not utilize outside storage.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning
Application No. PA98-O410 (Development Plan); adopt the Mitigated Monitoring Program for Planning Application No.
PA98.0410 (Development Plan); and adopt Resolution No. 98-041 approving Planning Application No. PA98-0410
(Development Plan) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPUCATION NO. PA98-0410 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF TWO (2)INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, 20,375 SQUARE FEET AND 17,720 SQUARE
FEET RESPECTIVELY, ON TWO (2) LOTS TOTALING 2.28 ACRES, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 909-290-033 AND 909-290-034.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Commission Soltysiak who was absent.
4. Plannin¢l Application NO. PA98-0348 (Development Plan)
Request to approve a Development Plan to construct and operate a 22,668 square foot industrial
speculative building.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
By way of overheads, Project Planner DeGange presented the staff report (per agenda material), noting that due to the
fact that a portion of the project is visible from Diaz Road the applicant has added additional landscaping to screen the
loading docks; clarified, for Chairwoman Slaven, that the applicant has addressed the flood control issue via
correspondence with Riverside County Flood Control (per supplemental agenda material); and advised that the applicant
and Public Works Staff are recommending that Conditions No. 44 and 46 be deleted.
For Chairwoman Slaven, Senior Engineer Alegria noted that other adjacent properties have not been required to install
flood control easements between this project and Winchester Road.
Mr. Brian Fronk, the applicant, advised that he was available for questions.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, clarified the flood control issue, for Chairwoman Slaven, advising that Flood
Control owns and maintains everything in fee title from this property to Diaz Road and with regard to maintenance, noted
that Flood Control is currently mowing the creek, although they are not permitted to mow the side slopes.
Mr. Vince Didonato, landscape architect, representing the applicant, clarified, for Commissioner Naggar, regarding the
screening from Diaz Road, that an additional five Oak Trees have been added to provide height and additional shrubs to
buffer the view of the loading docks.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; adopt a Negative Declaration with a Finding of
DeMinimus Impact for Planning Application No. PA98-0348; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA98-0348; and adopt Resolution No. 98-042 recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-
0348 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPUCATION NO. PA98-0348 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 22,561 SQUARE FOOT TWO-
STORY SPECULATIVE OFFICE, WAREHOUSE AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 1.89 GROSS ACRES,
LOCATED AT THE KNUCKLE OF THE INTERSECTION OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST AND
COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 25 FEET WEST OF COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-480-015.
Modify
that Conditions No. 44 and 46 be deleted
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Commission Soltysiak who was absent.
5. Planning Application NO. PA98-0386 (Development Plan)
Request to design, construct and operate a 51,289 square foot speculative office building with
associated parking and landscaping located on a parcel containing 4.01 gross acres.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the requesL
Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record), advising that staff is of the opinion that this project will
exhibit exemplary architecture, and commended the architect; and noted that the project far exceeds the landscaping
requirements, noting that thirty-eight percent (38%) of the site has been landscaped.
Mr. Dean Davidson, architect, representing the applicant, apologized for not providing the color board for the Commission,
noting, for Commissbner Webster, that the primary color of the building is a sofiened white, advising that a sample will be
submitted for Commission review; and clarified as to Condition No. 13, for Chairwoman Slaven, that although the actual
equipment has not yet been designed, there will be no roof-top mounted equipment; and addressed the location of the
lobby and luncheon area, and the height of the building, with regard to the line of vision from Rancho California Road.
Commissioner Guerriero commended the architect on the unique style of architecture.
Mr. Roger Jaeger, 41325 Billy Joe Lane, commented that although he is not opposed to this particular project, he views
traffic as a serious problem, noting that he has attended the circulation meetings, reviewed the Capitol Improvement Plans,
discussed his concerns with the Traffic Engineer, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, the Senior Planner, and
Councilman Steve Ford; stated he doesn't agree with the continuous building in light of the current state of traffic, and was
under the opinion the City should adopt a slow-growth policy; queried how the Commission could put its approval on more
projects, maintaining no negative impact with regard to traffic.
Further elaborating on Mr. Jaeger's concerns, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that new development will provide the
City with Development Impact Fees, enabling the City to improve traffic conditions and the infrastructure in the City, noting
that this project is consistent with the General Plan; clarified that when the proposed traffic improvements are completed,
there will be an improvement in traffic conditions; and clarified the rationale with regard to the no negative impact in the
studies (per agenda material), with regard to traffic, was due to the mitigating measures.
Commissioner Naggar noted, for Mr. Jaeger, that although he concurred with the traffic concerns, he couldn't justify denial
on projects such as the proposed, resulting in a single development beadng the weight of the City's traffic problems.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning
Application No. PA98-0386; adopt the Mitigatbn Monitoring Program for Planning Applicatbn No. PA98-0386; and adopt
Resolution No. 98-043 recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0386 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Repod and subject to the Conditions of Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPUCATION NO. PA98-0386 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A TWO-STORY, 51,289 SQUARE
FOOT SPECULATIVE OFFICE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON
A PARCEL CONTAINING A 3.05 (NET) ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
940-310-029.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of
Commission Soltysiak who was absent.
6. Plannin~l Application NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
Request to design, construct and operate 15 speculative industrial/manufacturing/office buildings
toteling 81,885 square feet with associated parking and landscaping on two parcels consisting of 6.02
acres.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request.
By way of overheads, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (per agenda material), highlighting site design,
access, architecture and landscaping; clarified that this project is not within the flood plain; noted that staff is opposed to
the additional fencing providing outdoor secured storage areas (which was added to the project after staff's review and after
the scheduling the project for public hearing), due to the following concems: that it would become an outside storage area
which would eliminate required common parking; noted that the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is requiring review
and approval of the plant palette and that the planting be installed by hand, rather than using heavy equipment (per
Condition 4a and 4b, of record); and noted that the City's landscape architect has recommended requirement of temporary
irrigation on the east slope until the vegetation is thriving. For Commissioner Guerriero, Ms. Anders presented the color
board.
By way of renderings, Mr. Jack Selman, architect, representing the applicant, presented the site plan; clarified the rationale
for the fencing as to separate and define the parking areas for each tenant, noting that there will be no outdoor storage;
noted the type of potential tenant necessitating the provision of an additional gate for secured parking as such: civil or soil
engineering companies, contractors, or carpet cleaning companies, for the purpose of securing trucks or vans.
Mr. Vince Didonato, landscape architect, representing the applicant, advised, for Commissioner Webster, that the planting
specifications require more input from DFG (Department of Fish and Game.)
For Chairwoman Slaven, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified, with regard to the percentage of remaining landscaping
on the site plan if the landscaped slope were excluded, that the landscaping percentage would then be at fourteen percent
(14%).
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, advised that the applicant has agreed to dedicate a maintenance access
easement over the slope, noting that after the completion of the Murrieta Creek Improvement that that slope area portion
of the parcel would be reclaimed as part of the property; for Commissioner Guerriero, clarified that the aforementioned
property is owned by the applicant, and that the applicant has offered to landscape the slope per DFG standards.
In light of Commission discussion about landscaping, Mr. Jack Selman offered to add an additional five-(5) feet of
landscaping facilitated by moving the buildings back, increasing the front landscaping from twelve (12) to seventeen (17)
feet.
Commissioner Guerriero was in favor of the additional landscaping, but expressed his opposition to the fencing in the
parking area for the following reasons: that with regard to health and safety, the fenced areas would present a problem
with law enforcement and the Fire Department, and as to the issue of welfare, it would encourage inappropriate storage.
Commissioner Naggar concurred with Commissioner Guerriero's comments on the landscaping and fencing, adding that
the fencing would create a loss of continuity.
Commissioner Webster concurred with opposing the internal fencing, and recommended designated tenant parking to
separate and define the parking areas.
Chairwoman Slaven expressed an overall opposition to the project, as proposed, due to the following concerns:
that she concurred with the aforementioned opposition to the fencing, with regard to health, safety and
welfare, and additionally viewed the fencing as a potential problem with Code Enforcement
that the landscaping will be minimal
that the project, as proposed, was not well designed, and incompatible with the surrounding uses, i.e.,
not meeting the standards that the City has sought over the years Ms. Slaven recommended modifying
the proposed project.
Mr. Jack Selman daftfled the rationale for this type of project; noted, for Commissioner Guerriero, the market demand for
small entrepreneur ownership, advising that current similar projects in other areas built by the developer are one hundred
percent (100%) sold; clarified that the property would be regulated by CC&R's; and advised that the applicant would prefer
a denial, rather than a major redesign of the proposed site plan.
Commissioner Guerriero noted that although he concurred with Chairwoman Slaven's concerns, due to public interest in
projects such as this, he would support the project, modified as follows:
additional landscaping
modification of the color scheme
no internal fencing
Initially, Mr. Selman commented that the applicant would be agreeable with the aforementioned modifications.
After lengthy discussion, at the request of Mr. Selman, the Commissioners expressed their comments, as follows:
Commissioners Guerdero, Naggar, and Slaven noted their approval of the project with the aforementioned modifications
to the landscaping, color scheme, and internal fencing. Commissioner Webster would approve the project, as proposed,
with the removal of the internal fencing.
After additional discussion with the applicant and his representatives, Mr. Jack Selman requested that the Planning
Commission vote on the project, as proposed, specifbally noting that the applicant would not be agreeable to the removal
of the internal fencing.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; and deny Planning Application No. PA98o0347
(Development Plan). The motion was seconded by Commissbner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Commission Soltysiak who was absent.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that due to the temporan/technical computer problems, the conditbns for the
projects would be attached, rather than incorporated into the staff report.
B. Ms. Ubnoske recommended having a traffic workshop with the Planning Commission, addressing the concerns
of the Commissioners.
C. Senior Planner Fagan noted that at the January 20, 1999, Planning Commission Meeting, staff will address the
current traffic circulation report, noting that this will be the only item on the agenda, in order to allow time for the
Commission to address their traffic concerns.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
A. With regard to specific traffic concerns, Chairwoman Slaven noted that she would like to have addressed the
percentage, with regard to traffic, in the staff report, specifically what it references.
B. Commissioner Webster suggested, with regard to traffic, with respect to the peroentage (per the staff report), that
the question be answered, clarifying the threshold for significant impact, and if there were significant impact, do our
standard mitigation measures sufficiently address that impact.
C. Commissioner Naggar would like clarity on the Commission's purview with regard to the impact of the traffic issue
as a whole, and specifically what leverage the Commission has without exceeding its boundaries.
D. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that since the City has a highly qualified staff, it's important to support staffs
recommendations.
E. Ms. Ubnoske noted, for Commissioner Guerriero, with regard to staff reports, and his recommendation of
provision of color boards, traffic reports, and hazardous material reports on the projects, that the color boards should be
provided for each project, however, the traffic and hazardous material reports are of such a highly technical nature,
requiring qualified interpretation, advised that it may be more helpful if staff were more informative with the results that
have been rendered.
F. Commissioner Guerdero, echoed by Commissioner Naggar, recommended educating the public with regard to
traffic issues, presenting the impact our City receives from sources we have no control over, i.e., surrounding cities, and
the County, noting the current planned improvements which will affect a positive change; suggested apprising the
community that traffic problems are being addressed in the City and that their concerns are being addressed. Due to
Commission concern, he advised that two of the Commissioners regularly attend traffic meetings.
G. For Chairwoman Slaven, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified the criteria for fast-track projects; advised that, in
light of all the new growth and developments, staff would not ovedoad the agenda, thereby necessitating the Commission
rushing through the review of projects coming into our City.
H. Ms. Ubnoske noted, in response to Commissioner Guerriero's concerns relative to the ratio between the
population and new development possibly rendering a condition of unoccupied buildings, that Dr. John Husing is currently
working on a study of evaluation of all these factors in the City, and further investigation is being done to make a
determination and present recommendations.
I. Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern that at the corner of Front Street and Rancho Califomia Road there
were 16 black 55-gallon drums with no identifying labels stored outside the fenced area for one week, clarifying that the
potentially dangerous situation was resolved by notifying a motor officer. Ms. Ubnoske noted that she would pass on this
information to Deputy Director of Public Works Parks.
J. Assistant Planner Anders clarified, for Commissioner Naggar, with regard to flood control correspondence, that
if the presented issue were significant, staff would require the applicant to address the issue before it comes before the
Commission.
K. Planning Manager Ubnoske noted, for Commissioner Naggar, that the City would call the Black Angus restaurant
in Temecula, addressing the northeast corner's dn/lawn and the need for additional trees.
L. Commissioner Naggar reported to the Commission that the Traffic Commission and the School District has agreed
that the crosswalk at Margafita Road was a hazard (a topic of concern at Commission Meetings) and was recommending
closing the crosswalk and closing the open-fenced area adjacent to that crosswalk.
M. Commissioner Webster expressed concern about the number of trucks parking on the dirt podion of Diaz Road.
N. For clarity for staff, Attorney Cudey reiterated the rationale of the Commission for the denial of Agenda Item No.6
as the health, safety, and welfare concerns from the fencing and layout of the landscaping, and the applicant's
representative's comments that the fencing was a key element, and the request to make a decision on the project, as
proposed. Chairwoman Slaven confirmed Attorney Cudey's recapitulation for staffs clarification.
O. Attorney Cudey duly noted Larry Markham's protest to the aforementioned comment.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:59 P.M. Chairwoman Slaven formally adjoumed this meeting to Wednesday, December 2. 1998, at 6:00 P.M., in the
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Marcia Slaven, Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DATED NOVEMBER 18, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\347pa98CC.doc
11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 18, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
RECOM MEN DATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. PA98-0347;
,
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA98-0347; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- approving of Planning
Application No. PA98-0347 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Architects Orange/David Boddy
REPRESENTATIVE:
Saddleback/Brian Fronk
PROPOSAL:
The design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885
square feet located on two parcels consisting of 6.02 acres
with associated parking and landscaping.
LOCATION:
On the west side of Commerce Center Drive, adjacent to
Murrieta Creek, north of Via Montezuma.
EXISTING ZONING:
LI (Light Industrial)
SURROUNDINGZONING:
North: LI (Light Industrial)
South: LI (Light Industrial)
East: LI (Light Industrial) & CC (Community Commercial)
West: OS-C (Conservation)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC
BP (Business Park)
Vacant
1
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: BP (Business Park)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing industrial/commercial uses.
Vacant and existing industrial/commercial
development uses.
Existing and proposed industrial,
warehouse, commercial and office uses.
Murrieta Creek and variety of industrial,
office, warehouse uses.
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
6.02 acres (net and gross)
Total Area:
262,231 square feet
Total Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
81,885 square feet
52,476 square feet
112,759 square feet
37%
20%
43%
100%
Parking Required:
Office = 9,750 square feet:
Manufacturing = 50,585 square feet:
Warehouse = 21,520 square feet:
032
126
022
Total = 81,885 square feet:
180
Parking Provided:
Standard Spaces:
Handicap Spaces:
197
015
Total = 212
Building Heights:
All Buildings are Twenty-Four feet (24') in height
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held on May 18, 1998. A formal application was submitted on
August 19, 1998. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on September
10, 1998, with staff providing written comments on September 17, 1998. The project was
deemed complete on October 26, 1998.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of the design, construction and operation of 15 speculative-
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two parcels
consisting of 6.02 acres with associated improvements, such as hardscape, parking,
landscaping and drive aisles. As proposed, the project straddles the existing property lines;
therefore, the project will be conditioned to receive approval of the parcel merger application
that is currently in processing (PA98-0411) to combine the two lots prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
ANALYSIS
Site Desi.qn
The proposed site is located at the west side of Commerce Center Drive, immediately adjacent
to Murrieta Creek. The building sizes range from 4,375 square feet to 10,665 square feet. The
site plan shows a portion of buildings 4 and 5 within the 100-year flood plain; however, based on
a recent filed topographic survey (March of 1998), the project engineer states that these
structures are not within the flood plain as illustrated on the grading plan. The County Flood
Control's position is that the project is located within the lO0-year flood plain and encroaches
onto the side slope of the Mumeta Creek based on 1987-88 topographic information from the
County (see attachment 'T', County letter dated September 24, 1998, and the Engineer's
response letter dated October 22, 1998). The City is accepting the applicant's position that the
buildings are outside of the 100 year flood plain and will not be encroaching into the bank of the
creek based on the more recent 1998 topographic survey from a licensed engineer.
The applicant is proposing wrought iron fencing throughout the entire project, in addition to what
is shown on the site plan (see attachment "J"). This additional fencing was added to the project
after staff's review and scheduling the project for public hearing; therefore staff was unable to
comment on the fences. Staff indicated that they could not support the addition of the fences to
create secured storage area because it would remove common parking that is required for the
approval of this project. In addition, staff has concerns that these areas would become unsightly
outdoor storage areas for old or used parts, equipment or vehicles. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the Planning Commission not allow the proposed storage areas (see
Condition No. 4d) and delete all fencing internal to the project.
With the removal of the wrought iron fences and the secured storage areas, staff feels the site
design is compatible with existing development in the area.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
The subject site proposes two driveways off of Commerce Center Drive, which provides circular
vehicular access and circulation to service the site. Parking is located throughout the site, which
provides access to all buildings. With the removal of the wrought iron fences which blocks off
common parking spaces required for the approval of this project, the site has sufficient parking
and ingress and egress.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL. DOC 3
Architecture
This project offers four (4) different elevations with four (4) color schemes for the fifteen (15)
speculative buildings. Staff has worked closely with the architect to ensure a variety of design
and colors, while maintaining continuity throughout the project. Building elevations and colors
were closely reviewed with the architect and to ensure a quality streetscape along the
Commerce Center Drive.
The proposed buildings offer raised, extended parapets at each entry, which clearly define the
entry as required by the City-Wide Design Guidelines. The main entries are further articulated
by heavy landscaping, extensive reveals, column features and painted architectural elements.
The buildings also have extensive reveal patterns and several accent paint colors to add visual
interest to the buildings and throughout the development.
No signage is being approved with this speculative building. As proposed, the structures are
compatible with the existing buildings in the area in terms of design, colors, materials, height,
bulk and mass.
Landscaping
Twenty percent (20%) of the site has been landscaped, which meets the minimum twenty
percent (20%) minimum landscaping requirement for the LI (Light Industrial) zone. The 20%
proposed landscaping includes the revegetation of the east slope of the Murrieta Creek, which
lies within the subject property. In order for this area to count toward the landscaping
requirement, the slope must be upgraded by planting native trees, shrubs and ground covers.
Because the Murrieta Creek is considered a significant wetland to the California Department of
Fish and Game (DFG), DFG is requiring the revegetation of the slope to be native species. DFG
is also requiring review and approval of the proposed plant palette for the slope, and is requiring
that all planting be installed by hand so that no damage will occur to the slope or the creek bed.
Therefore, the project will be conditioned to receive approval of the plant palette by DFG prior to
approval the final construction landscape plans, and all vegetation on the slope to be install by
hand (see condition No. 4a and 4b). Should any damage occur to the slope during construction
or revegetation of the slope, the project is conditioned to notify the DFG immediately to minimize
or mitigate any damage that may occur.
In addition, the City's Landscape Architect recommends that the east slope will be required to
have temporary irrigation for a minimum of three to five years to ensure the revegetation is
successful. Once the vegetation on the slope is growing in a healthy and thriving manner, the
City's Landscape Architect recommends that the temporary landscaping be removed. Staff feels
this is an appropriate request and has conditioned the project accordingly (see condition No.
4c).
The landscaping provided outside of the slope area was dispersed extensively along Commerce
Center Drive to create a quality streetscape into the project. There is landscaping proposed at
the front elevation of each building which also serves to help define the main entry of each
building. There are landscaped planters throughout the parking area and along most side
elevations which will help break up the parking lot paving and soften the elevations.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINALDOC 4
With the above referenced conditions of approval, staff feels the landscaping will serve to
enhance the overall project and be a significant improvement to the east slope of the Murrieta
Creek.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is BP (Business Park). Existing zoning for
the site is LI (Light Industrial). Industrial/warehouse/office building are permitted with the
approval of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.08 of the Development Code. With the
approval of the parcel merger currently in process, the project as proposed is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code and City-Wide Design Guidelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although
the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in
the Conditions of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated to
a level of insignificance.
SUM MARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project consists of the design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two parcels
consisting of 6.02 acres with associated improvements, such as hardscape, parking,
landscaping and drive aisles. As proposed, the project straddles the existing property lines;
therefore, the project will be conditioned to receive approval of the parcel merger application
that is currently in processing (PA98-0411) to combine the two lots prior to the issuance of a
building permit. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan, Development
Code, and the Design Guidelines and will comply with the requirements of the California
Department of Fish and Game relative to the revegetation of the east slope of the Murrieta
Creek.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance
No. 655 (Mr. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINAL.DOC 5
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site· There are no native
species of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species
exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Initial Study - Blue Page 23
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 24
Exhibits - Blue Page 25
B.
C
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Vicinity Map
General Plan Map
Zoning Map
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Elevations
Colors and Materials Board
Floor Plan
County Flood Control Letter and Exhibit dated September 24, 1998 and the
Engineers response letter dated October 22, 1998.
Proposed Outdoor Secured Storage Areas
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINAL. DOC 7
PC RESOLUTION NO. g8-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA98-0386 THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF 15 SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL/
MANUFACTURING/OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 81,885
SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON TWO PARCELS CONSISTING
OF 6.02 ACRES WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
LANDSCAPING LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, ADJACENT TO MURRIETA
CREEK, NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-400-017 AND 921-400-044.
WHEREAS, Saddleback filed Planning Application No. PA98-0347 in accordance with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0347 was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0347
on November 18, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. PA98-0347;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA98-0347 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project
is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances
and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 8
C. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native species
of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the
site serves as a migration corridor.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in
the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA98-0347 for the design, construction and operation of 15
speculative industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on two
parcels consisting of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping, and known as
Assessors Parcel No. 921-400-017 and 921-400-044 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting there of, held on the 18th day of
November, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINAL. DOC 10
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
Project Description: The design, construction and operation of 15 speculative
industrial/manufacturing/office buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on
two parcels consisting of 6.02 acres with associated parking and landscaping.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-400-017 and 921-400-044.
Approval Date: November 18, 1998
Expiration Date: November 18, 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two
Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and Califomia Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition,
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and
any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents
from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Specific Plan
Amendment which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and
Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not
by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the
developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period.
City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either
promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible
to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality
thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC I I
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void, By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved
Mitigation Monitoring Program.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Attachment D, or as
amended by these conditions.
a. Nine (9) Class I lockers or Class II bicycle racks shall be provided.
b. A minimum of one hundred eighty (180) parking spaces shall be provided.
c. A minimum of fifteen (15) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
d. A minimum of eighteen (18) motorcycle spaces shall be provided throughout the site.
There shall not be any internal fences or outdoor secured storage areas as shown on
Attachment J or any modification thereof.
The site plan shall be modified to illustrate the correct location of the 100 year flood
plain to be consistent with the grading plan.
Landscaping shall be provided in substantial conformance with Attachment "E"
(Landscape Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the
project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is
determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with
the approved landscape plan.
The east slope planting of the Murrieta Creek shall be upgraded with the planting
of native plants, trees, shrubs and ground cover that shall be reviewed and
approved by the City and the California Department and Fish and Game. The
final construction landscape plans shall consist of the plantings approved by the
City and the Department of Fish and Game.
All landscaping on the east slope of the Murrieta Creek shall be installed by hand
and shall not utilize equipment. If any damage should occur to the slope or creek
bed during revegetation of the slope or during construction of the project, all work
shall stop and the applicant or his employees, contractors or represents shall
notify the Department of Fish and Game immediately.
Temporary irrigation shall be installed (by hand) on the east slope of the Murrieta
Creek for a minimum of three to five years to ensure that the revegetation is
maintained in a healthy, thriving condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 12
Building elevations shall conform substantially to Exhibit F and Exhibit G (color
elevations), or as amended by these conditions.
Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H, or as amended by
these conditions (color and material board).
Materials Colors
Color Scheme #1
1A Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
1B Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
1C Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
1 D Steel Beam/Steel Grill
Frazee "Sawyer's Fence" 8231W
Frazee "Daplin" 8234M
Frazee "Crisp Khaki" 8233M
Frazee "Elm Court" 8595D
Color Scheme #2
2A Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
2B Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
2C Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
2D Steel Beam/Steel Grill
Frazee "Clay Beige" 8721W
Frazee "Tumbleweed" 8723W
Frazee "Meadowlark" 8724M
Frazee "Brick Rose" 8385D
Color Scheme #3
3A Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
3B Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
3C Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
3D Steel Beam/Steel Grill
Frazee "Lombardi Mist" 8531W
Frazee "Summer Fog" 8533w
Frazee "Solid Gray" 8534W
Frazee "Winter Sea" 8565D
Color Scheme
4A Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
4B Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
4C Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
4D Steel Beam/Steel Grill
5 Aluminum Storefront and Glazing
Glazing
Storefront
6 Aluminum Storefront and Glazing
Glazing
Storefront
7 1" Recessed Accents
Frazee "European Gray" 8631W
Frazee "Smoky Candle" 8633W
Frazee "Dusty Miller" 8634W
Frazee "Pigeon Isle" 8875D
Solar Gray
Arcadia "Black"
Solar Bronze
Arcadia "Dark Bronze"
Adjacent Color
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation).
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL,DOC 13
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
10.
The applicant shall submit evidence of native plant palette approval from the California
Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula.
11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
12.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "E", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall
be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover
page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans
shall be accompanied by the following items:
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
13.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required if signage
is proposed. An application for signage shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Manager.
14. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
15
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape and
irrigation plans.
16.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
17.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70
square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a
minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 14
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces
not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued
for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909
696- 3000".
18.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the planrings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of
occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been
maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be
released.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
20.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California
Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code;
Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations
Temecula Municipal Code.
Building,
California
and the
21.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
22.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
23. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
24. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-I/F-1.
25. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
26.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998).
27. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 15
28. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
29. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
30.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
31.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
32. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
33.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
34. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
35.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
36. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
37.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
38.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls require separate
approvals and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
General Requirements
39.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work
and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
40.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
41.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with
adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be
submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINAL.DOC 16
Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit
42.
No grading shall be permitted along the westerly property boundary from the top of slope
to the westerly property boundary.
43.
A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their Right-of-Way.
44.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
45.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
46.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
47.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and
liquefaction.
48.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
49.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
50.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department of Public Works
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 17
51.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
52.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
53.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
54.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
55.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which
may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development
Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
56.
The Developer shall obtain approval of PA 98-0411, Certificate of Parcel Merger,
merging Lot 8 of Tract Map 16178-1 and Parcel A of Waived Parcel Map 28618. A copy
of the recorded parcel merger shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public
Works Department.
57.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public
Works. The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
58.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 18
59.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
60.
The Developer shall dedicate an access and maintenance easement measured from the
top of slope the existing Murrieta Creek Channel bank to the westerly property line. The
easement shall provide for the ingress/egress and maintenance of Murrieta Creek. The
easement shall be granted to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District. The term of the easement shall sunset upon completion of the Murrieta Creek
Channel Improvements adjacent to the property. A copy of the recorded easement shall
be submitted to the Planning Department and the Public Works Department.
61.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
62.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
63.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
64.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903.2,
Appendix Ill.A)
65.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix III. B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be
located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be
required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B).
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 19
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For
this project on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2).
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 70,0001bs GVVV. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. ( UFC sec 902 and Ord 95-15).
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15).
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4).
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1).
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ).
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3).
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15).
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINALDOC 20
76.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile
home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the
complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit
numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design
specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior
to installation.
77.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15).
78.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(UFC Article 10).
79.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (UFC 902.4).
80.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4).
81.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions Uniform Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (UFC Article 81).
82.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(UFC 7901.3 and 8001.3).
OTHER AGENCIES
83.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated August 28, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
84. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 27, 1998, a
copy of which is attached.
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 21
85.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations as set forth in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated September 8, 1998, a copy of which is attached, to the
extent practical and not in conflict with conditions contained herein.
86.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the
above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained
in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to
make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC .FINAL. DOC 22
Ranehn
Watnr
· John F. Hennigar
Phillip 1,. Forbes
Kenneth 1'. Deal)
Perry R. l,ouck
Linda M. Frcgoso
C Michael Coxyell
Best Bt~st & Krieger LLP
August 28, 1998
Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
LOTS NO. 8 AND NO. 9 OF TRACT NO. 16178-1
APN 921-400-017 & 921-400-044
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
98/SB:rnc192/F012-T1/FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Rancho ('alifornia Water I)istrict
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: August 27, 1998
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CLARENCE HARRISON, Environmental Health Specialist III
PLOT PLAN NO. PA98-0347
,
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA98-0347 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
· Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2.)
· Waste reduction management.
d) A letter from the Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(9O9) 275-898O
NOTE:
Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, 464 W. 4th STREET, 6th FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
PETE W~LSON, Governor
September 8, 1998
08 Riv-15-5.97
Ms. Patty Anders
Assistant Planner
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Ms. Anders:
planning Application No. 98-0347
We have reviewed the above referenced document and request
consideration of the following:
Caltrans supports economic growth and orderly land use
development; however, new development must pay its fair
share for upgrading infrastructure facilities needed to
serve the development. This infrastructure includes State
highways and freeways. It also includes both direct and
cumulative traffic impacts. All jurisdictions should take
measures available to fund improvements and reduce total
trips generated. In view of the fact there are limited
funds available for infrastructure improvements, we
recommend the City of Temecula take the lead in developing
a fair-share mechanism in which each project can fund
improvements for the decrease in Level of Service (LOS) for
which it is responsible.
Please submit a copy of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration of the Planning Application No. 98-0347
(Development Plan) to this office at the earliest
possible convenience.
If you have any questions, please contact Garrett Miyahira
at (909) 383-6212 or FAX (909) 383-5936.
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Regional Planning/
Forecasting/Public Transportation
cc: Hideo Sugita, RCTC
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 23
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
1. Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Temecula, CA 92589
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Planning Application No. PA98-0347 (Development
Plan)
City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner (909) 694-6400
The west side of Commerce Center Ddve, adjacent
to Murrieta Creek, north of Via Montezuma.
Brian Fronk, Saddleback, 2615 Orange Ave., Santa
Ana, CA 92707
BP (Business Park)
LI (Light Industrial)
The design, construction and operation of 15
speculative industrial/manufacturing/office
buildings totaling 81,885 square feet located on
two parcel consisting of 6.02 acre site. As
proposed, the project straddles the existing
property lines; therefore, the project will be
conditioned to receive approval of the parcel
merger application that is currently in processing
(PA98-0411 ) to combine the two lots prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
The project is located in a area that has been
previously graded, street improvements have been
made and water and sewer are within vicinity of
the project. Land to the north and south is
industrial and commercial uses, to the west is
Murrieta Creek and further west is
industrial/office/warehouse uses, and to the east
is existing and proposed industrial, warehouse
and office uses.
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
15
10.
Other public agencies whose
approval is required:
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside
County Health Department, Temecula Police
Department, Eastern Municipal Water District,
Rancho California Water District, Southern
California Gas Company, Southern California
Edison Company, General Telephone Company,
and Riverside Transit Agency.
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
16
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
[X] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services
[X] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [X] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[X] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been
added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Name Date
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
17
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rapture?
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land?
h. Expansive soils?
i. Unique geologic or physical features?
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the
rate and amount of surface ranoff?.
b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (Source 2, Figure 13, Page 95 and
Source 2, Figure 30, Page 190)
c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
mrbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
IncorDorated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Iml~aet
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[x]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
No
Immct
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
18
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
5. MR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)?
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
19
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[ x]
[]
[1
[x]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[x]
Ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
C,
manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards?
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental services?
12.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Ineomorated
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
Ix]
[x]
R: \S TAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
20
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
[]
[]
[]
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
[]
[1
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a,
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
[]
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? [ ]
C,
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? CCnmulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
[]
d,
Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
[]
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less Than
Significant
Impact
[]
[x]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
No
Impact
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
21
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potemially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
17. EARLIER ANALYSES.
None.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. City of Temecula Development Code
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
22
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Land Use and Planning
1.b
The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General
Plan Land Use Designation of BP (Business Park). Impacts from all General Plan Land Use
Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General
Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis
contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation
measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project. Furthermore, all agencies
with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the opportunity to comment on the
project and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the
project relates to their specific environmental plans or polices. The site has been previously
graded and services within proximity of the project. As proposed, the project straddles the
existing property lines; therefore, the project will be conditioned to receive approval of the
parcel merger that is currently in processing (PA98-0411 ) to combine the two lots prior to
the issuance of a building permit. There will be limited, if any environmental effects on
environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. No
significant effects on the land use or environmental policies are anticipated as a result of
this project.
1.6
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minority community) or agricultural resources or operations. The
project is a speculative office building in an area surrounded by land that is developed with
similar industrial, manufacturing, office and warehouse uses, as well as vacant land that is
zoned to accommodate similar uses. There is no established residential community
(including low-income or minority community) at this site. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Population and Housing
2.8.
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The
project is a speculative office building that is consistent with the City's General Plan Land
Use Designation of Business Park. Since the project is consistent with the City's General
Plan, and does not exceed the floor area ratio for Business Park, it will not be a significant
contributor to population growth that will cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
2.b.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The
project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of BP (Business Park).
The project will cause people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its limited
scale, it will not induce substantial growth in the area. No significant effects are anticipated
as a result of this project.
2.c.
The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing. The project site is
vacant; therefore no housing will be displaced. No significant effects are anticipated as a
result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
23
Geologic Problems
3.a.
The project will result in a less than significant impact on people as a result of fault rupture.
The project is not located in a fault zone or within a fault setback area; therefore no
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.b,c,
g,h.
The project may have a potentially significant impact on people involving seismic ground
shaking as the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active.
There may also be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground failure, liquefaction,
subsidence and expansive soils. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated through
building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. In addition,
a soils report shall be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of grading permits.
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will be utilized in the
development of this site which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from
expansive soils. The soil reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of
the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground
shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction and subsidence. After mitigation measures are
performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d.
The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The project is
not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental
Impact for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or
mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
The project will have a less than significant impact from erosion, changes in topography,
grading or fill. The site has been previously graded and the project does not propose
significant grading beyond that which has already occurred. Increased wind and water
erosion of soils both on and off-site may occur during the construction phase of the project
and the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. Erosion control
techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-run,
hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project. Since
the amount of grading will be the minimum necessary for the realization of the project,
modification to topography and ground surface relief features will not be considered
significant. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be
mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. After
mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i.
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic
features or physical features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
24
Water
4.8.
4.b.
4.c.
4.d,e.
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and
amount of surface runoff; however, these changes are considered less than significant.
Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings,
accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will
change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances
for the project will be designed and constructed to safely and adequately handle runoff
which is created. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project could have an impact to people or property to water related hazards such as
flooding because of its proximity to the 100 year flood plain. Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District and the applicant disagree as to the location of the
100-year flood plain. The County Flood Control's position is that the project is located
within the 100-year flood plain and encroaches onto the side slope of Murdeta Creek based
upon 1987-88 topographic information from the County. The applicant's engineer is stating
that the entire project is outside of the 100 year flood plain based upon a field topographic
survey dated March of 1998 conducted by a licensed engineer. The City is accepting the
applicant's position that the buildings are outside of the 100 year flood plain and will not be
encroaching into the bank of the Murrieta Creek based on the more recent 1998
topographic survey from a licensed engineer. In addition, the project as proposed has the
finished floor of the buildings' elevated above the 100-year water surface elevation.
The project is also located within a dam inundation area as identified in the City of
Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Impacts can be mitigated by
utilizing existing emergency response systems and by assuring that these systems
continue to maintain adequate service provision as the City develops. Therefore, with the
incorporated conditions of approval, the finished floor building elevations, and the mitigation
monitoring program, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and
alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the
developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control
Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential
impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact in a change in the amount of surface
water in any waterbody or impact currents, or to the course or direction of water
movements. The project will not be allowed to drain into the adjacent Murrieta Creek, but
will be required to drain into the street. Additional surface runoff will occur because
previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings,
accompanying hardscape and driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the
additional amount of drainage will not considered significant. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
25
4.f-h.
The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground
waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability.
Limited changes will occur in the quantity and quality of ground waters; however, due to the
minor scale of the project, it will not be considered significant. Further, construction on the
site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.i.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater water
otherwise available for public water supplies. According to information contained in the
Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho
California Water District indicate that they can accommodate additional water demands."
Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to the project. Water service will
need to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This is typically provided
upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Air Quality
5.a.
The project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation. The project (81,885 square feet of office/manufacturing/warehouse
uses) is below the threshold for potentially significant air quality impact (276,000 square
feet) established by South Coast Air Quality Management District (Page 6-11, Table 6-2 of
the South Coast Air Quality Management CEQA Air Quality Handbook). No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.b.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant
pollutants in proximity to the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
5.0.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in
climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts
on the environment in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
5.d.
The project will create objectional odors dudng the construction phase of the project. These
impacts will be of shod duration and are not considered significant.
Transportation/Circulation
6.a.
While the project may result in an incremental increase in traffic congestion it will result in
a less than significant increase in vehicle trips. It is anticipated that this project will
contribute less than a significant increase in existing volumes during the AM peak hour and
PM peak hour time frames to the intersections of Rancho California Road and and Front
Street, Overland Drive and Jefferson Avenure, and Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue
according to standard trip calculation methodologies. The proposed development is in
compliance with the land use and development standards of this zone that was analyzed
in the EIR for the General Plan. Therefore, it is determined that the proposed development
will not adversely affect the LOS for this area, but was included in the EIR analysis. The
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
26
applicant will be required to pay traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as
conditions of approval for the project. After mitigation measures are performed and
development impact fees paid, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.b.
The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed
to current City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from design features.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c.
The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The
project is a speculative office use in an area with existing and similar planned uses. The
project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. The
project does not provide direct access to nearby uses; therefore, it will not impact access
to nearby uses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.d.
The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. Off-site parking will not be
impacted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.e,
The project will not result in a less than significant impact from hazards or barriers for
pedestrians or bicyclists. Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part
of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.f.
The project will not result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation. The project was transmitted to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and
based upon their response to similar projects in the area, it is not anticipated the project will
impact RTA facilities or services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
6.g.
The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists
currently in the immediate proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Biological Resources
7.a.
The proposed project may have a potentially significant effect on endangered, threatened
or rare species or their habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds during the construction phase of this project if damage occurs to the adjacent
Murrietta creek slope or creek bed. The proposed project consists of two (2) of the 15
buildings being located at the top of the slope of the Murrieta Creek, as well as revegetation
of the east side of the Creek. The project will be conditioned not to damage the side of the
creek or the creek bed dudng construction or revegetation of the slope. All landscaping will
be approved by the California Department of Fish and Game and will be conditioned to be
installed by hand, not with any type of equipment, pursuant to the requirement of the
California Department of Fish and Game.
There are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species
of plants, or native vegetation on the site as the site was previously graded. Furthermore,
there is no indication that any wildlife species exist at this location. The project will not
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
27
reduce the number of species, provide a barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate
existing habitat. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee
Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts
to the species. With the conditions of approval, approval of the California Department of
Fish and Game regarding the plant palette, landscaping installation requirements, and
protecting the Creek bed during construction, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
7.b.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated
species are protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not
protected elsewhere in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and since
there are no locally designated species on site, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
7.c.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities. Reference
response 7.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.d.
It is anticipated that the project will result in a potentially significant impact to wetland habitat
unless mitigation measures are incorporated. The proposed project is adjacent to the
Murrieta creek and consists of two buildings to be built at the top of slope and the
revegetation of the east slope. The project will be conditioned to protect the adjacent
Murrieta creek bed and the east side of the slope during construction. If the slope or creek
bed is damaged in any way during construction or revegetation of the east slope, the
applicant will be conditioned to require all necessary permits and or clearances from the
California Department of Fish and Game. The California Department of Fish and Game will
review and approve the plant palette prior to receiving City approval to ensure appropriate
planrings will be utilized that are natural or native, and not evasive to the slope or the Creek
bed. With the approval of the plant palette by the California Department of Fish and Game
and the conditions of approval placed on this project to protect the Creek bed and the east
slope, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.e.
The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The
project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Energy and Mineral Resources
8.a.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is
found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
8.b.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable
resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate
of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s)
(construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent
depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed
development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doe
28
8.c.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this
project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Hazards
9.a.
The project will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. The
same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials.
Large quantities of these types of substances are not anticipated with this use. However,
the Department of Environmental Health regulates the use, storage and removal of
hazardous or toxic materials. Moreover, the Fire Department and the Department of
Environmental Health have reviewed the project and the applicant must receive their
clearances prior to any plan check submittal. This applies to storage and use of hazardous
materials; therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.b.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation
plan. The subject site is not located in an area that could impact an emergency response
plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and will therefore not impede
any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
9.c,
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard.
The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan
check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with
these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No
health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
9.e.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project is an industrial/warehouse development in an area of existing
and future similar uses. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
10.a.
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site
is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise
levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long
run. Long-term noise generated by this project would be similar to existing and proposed
uses in the area. No significant noise impacts are anticipated as a result of this project in
either the short or long-term.
10.b. The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase (short run). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
29
100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage
from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore
will not be considered significant. There will be no long-term exposure of people to noise.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Public Services
11 .a,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and
police protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service
provision from these entities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
11.c.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate
within or to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered
school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities,
including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax that
is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and
future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be
incremental, however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient
to cover any of the proposed expenses.
11 .e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the
site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.c.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental
impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's
General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much
water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states:
"implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater
services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
30
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no septic tanks on site or
proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.e.
The proposal will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The project will need to provide some
additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition
of approval for the project and will tie into the existing system. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid
waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this
development can be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling
Programs, which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
13.a,
The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in a
area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic
highways. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b.
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The applicant and
architect worked with City staff to ensure a design that complies with the City-Wide Design
Guidelines. The building is relatively consistent with other designs in the area. Therefore,
no adverse visual impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c.
The project will have a potentially significant impact unless mitigation measures for light and
glare is incorporated, The project will produce and result in a minimum amount of light or
glare considering the scope of the project. However, all light and glare has the potential to
impact the Mount Palomar Observatory; therefore the project will be conditioned to be
consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With the
conditions of approval, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
14.a-c.
The project will not have an impact on paleontological, archaeological or historical
resources. The site has been disturbed from prior grading activity and any impacts to these
resources have been mitigated during the grading process. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change, which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values. Reference response 14.a-c. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
31
14.e.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
15.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood
or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant
numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula. However, it will result in
an incremental impact or in an increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities. The same is true for the quality or quantity of existing
recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
32
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 24
Geolo_clic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA98-0347
(Development Plan)
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
34
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Department of Public
Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development
Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to the Planning
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic
ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake
hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Department,
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
35
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic
ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or eadhquake
hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact
adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been
incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
36
Transportation/Circulation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic
impacts.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for traffic signal mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site.
Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use.
Install on-site parking spaces pursuant to the City's minimum
Development Code parking standards.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works, Planning Department and Building & Safety
Department.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc, .doc
37
Biological Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat
habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department.
Impact to the existing, native and/or environmentally sensitive plantings
on the Murrieta Creek slope or creek bed.
Plant palette approved by the California Department of Fish and Game.
Submit conceptual landscaping plans to the California Department of Fish
and Game for review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Planning Department/California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact on slope stability or existing vegetation of the Murrieta creek slope
or creek bed.
Notify the California Department of Fish and Game when revegetation of
the slope occurs.
All landscaping shall be installed by hand. No equipment shall be utilized
to revegetate the slope.
During the revegetation of the east slope of the Murrieta Creek.
Planning Department/California Department of Fish and Game.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
38
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Impacts to wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)
On-site monitoring during construction and slope revegetation.
Contact the California Department of Fish and Game if any damage to
the Murrieta Creek bed or the east slope occurs during construction or
revegetation of the slope.
Obtain all necessary permits and/or clearances from the California
Department of Fish and Game and all applicable agencies.
Planning Department/California Department of Fish and Game.
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental
services regarding fire protection. The project will incrementally increase
the need for fire protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the
maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for Fire Mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
R:\STAFFRPT\347pa98pc..doc
39
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
AESTHETICS
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities,
including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic
impacts, and public facilities.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare
that could affect the Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655.
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval,
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
R: \STAFFRPT\347pa98pc.. doc
40
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT\347PA98PC.FINAL.DOC 25
CITY OF TEMECULA
VICINITY MAP - NTS (~
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 18, 1998
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 11/12/98 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B- ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
/
P BP
BP
LM ~
M i
EXHIBIT C- GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION- BP (BUSINESS PARK)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- November 18, 1998
R:\STAFFRPT~270PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 18, 1998
SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 18, 1998
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 11/12/98 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
~r ,o u,, .... WEST ELEVA T/ON
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
~' " SOUTH ELEVATION
~ ~ SOUTH ELEVATION
SADDLEBACK- COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, TEMECULA
A R C H I T E C T S O R A N G E
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 18, 1998
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - November 18, 1998
COLORS & MATERIALS
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
UNIT
4,375 SF
,UNIT 15
5,400 SF
UN, T ,2
4,375 SF
UNIT 13
5,400 SF
70'
UNIT 10
4,955 SF
66'
UNIT 11 '
6,150 SF
UNIT 9
5,410 SF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- November 18, 1998
FLOOR PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT~70PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
UNIT 3
10,665 SF
~35'
UNIT 2
4,735 SF
UNIT 1
5,410 SF
~,, UNIT 5
5,475 SF
UNIT 4
5,300 SF
UNIT 6
4,735 SF
4,735 SF ~ ~ 4,735 SF ~
- ~o
60' 60' _
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0347 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- November 18, 1998
FLOOR PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\270PA98.PC 11/12/98pa
ATTACHMENT I
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL LETTER
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
September 24, 1998
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/955-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
53912.1
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Patty Anders
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: PA 98-0347
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in
incorporated cities. The District does not plan check City land use cases, or provide State Division of
Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations
for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District
Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be
considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage
Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in
any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to
flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues.
PA 98-0347 is a proposal to construct 15 light industrial building ranging from 4,375 square feet to
10,665 square feet with associated parking and landscaping on a 6.02 acre lot located at the west side
of Commerce Center Drive adjacent to Murrieta Creek.
The side slopes on the southwestern portion of the site is within the 100 year Zone AE flood plain
limits for Murrieta Creek as delineated on Panel No 060742-0005B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program administered by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). According to District topography, it appears Building
Units 4 and 5 are beyond the channel bank and would be in the floodplain. The water surface
elevation for the FEMA flow rate of 30,900 cfs is 1015.00 at the upstream edge of the property. A
District flood study determined the base flood elevation for the master plan flow rate of 38,300 cfs to
be 1016.57 at the upstream edge of the property. The highwater mark during the flood of January
1993 was 1016.17. All the elevations are based on 1929 NGVD.
Because of the extreme hazard posed by Murrieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing
development to proceed adjacent to the creek until the ultimate improvement can be constructed.
Property within the floodplain should be conditioned to construct the required improvements to
Murrieta Creek Channel or participate in a financing mechanism such as an assessment district to
ensure necessary improvements are constructed.
53912,1
City of Temecula '2-
Re: PA 98-0347
September 24, 1998
If the City chooses to allow development to proceed, we recommend that the City require the
applicant to dedicate the existing Murrieta Creek Channel and a 25-foot wide access road adjacent to
the top of channel bank to the District (see Exhibit "A"). The access road is necessary for District
forces to patrol Murrieta Creek, and the District will not accept the channel dedication without the
access road. In order to protect the public's health and safety, the City, at a minimum, should require
the applicant to redesign the project to set back Building Units 4 and 5 an appropriate distance from
the top of channel bank. New buildings should be floodproofed by elevating the finished floor a
minimum of 12 inches above the District's base flood elevation for 38,300 cfs.
This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area
Drainage Plm~ for which drainage fees have been adopted, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's
check or money order to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the
actual permit.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to me at 909/955-1214.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Enclosure
c: City of Temecula Public Works
Attn: Jerry Allegria
Joe Kicak
SKM:slj
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
Development Consultants
October 22, 1998
Mr. Stuart E. McKibben
Senior Civil Engineer
Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District
1995 Market Street
Riverside, Ca. 92501
Re: Flood Letter dated 9-24-98 for City of Temecula case
PA98-0347 along Murrieta Creek (Saddleback 861)
Dear Stuart:
Pursuant to our meeting of September 24, 1998, I offer this letter as documentation of the
applicant' s position and to offer additional information in the form of a field topographic
survey performed by S and A Surveying dated 3-98 to substantiate our claim that the
FEMA floodplain exists as portrayed on the site plan for PA98-0347 and not as shown on
the Flood Letter Exhibit "A".
The Flood Exhibit "A" is based on the 1987-88 topographic survey and does not reflect
the existing condition. This fact is based on the grading that was done by the City of
Temecula/Flood Control as a pan of the Restoration Permit for Murrieta Creek that was
accomplished after the flooding in early 1993.
Buildings 4 and 5 do not encroach into the FEMA floodplain as plotted by elevation and
do not encroach onto the side slopes of the creek bank. Additionally, the subject buildings
are flood proofed to elevations 1020.0 and 1020.9. These elevations provide flood
proofing for both the FEMA and Master Plan flows.
I find the comment in paragraph 5 curious in the extreme in that Flood Control is
requesting the dedication of fight of way, construction of the ultimate improvements that
Flood Control cannot define at this time and to participate in an as yet to be defined
funding mechanism. Additionally, the preliminary plans showing the ultimate
improvements and right of way do not impact the subject property. All of these issues
are in a state of flux due to the ongoing Corp of Engineers Reconnaissance and
Feasibility Studies which will not be complete until 2001.
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N · Temecula, Califorma 92590 · (909) 6764672 FAX (909) 699-1848
MAIxKHAM & ASSOCIATES
The Flood Control District owns the entire Munieta Creek channel from the west
property line of the subject property to the Diaz road right of way. The regulatory permits
for the annual mowing operation does not allow the mowing of the side slopes and
restricts the mowing to the bottom only. The District utilizes Diaz Road to access the
channel with the equipment for mowing. The further request to dedicate a 25 foot
easement/road to patrol an area that the district has no permit to maintain is totally
unnecessary. Furthermore, the District has access to the creek in four locations along this
reach: namely Via Montezuma, both sides of the intersecting 100 foot channel and at the
south end of the constructed Murrieta Creek Channel.
By way of precedent, the two most recently approved and now constructed projects
(PA97-0341 and PA97-0409) have not been required to comply with these requirements.
To summarize, we are flood proofed above the FEMA elevations and will not dedicate
easements or right of way to the Flood Control district.
Sincerely,
Markham and Associates
Principal
co: Patty Anders- City of Temecula Planning
Gerald Alegria- City of Temecula Public Works
Jack Selman- Architects Orange
Ray Smith- Saddleback Associates
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N · Temecula, California 92590 · (909) 6764672 FAX (909) 699-1848
ATTACHMENT J
PROPOSED OUTDOOR SECURED STORAGE AREAS
10/27/1998 11:07 714-639-5286,_ ARCHITECTS ORANGE ~ PAGE
3AI~IC] 831N33 3383V~V~03
L
ITEM
19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~~
/
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
January 26, 1999
Review and Approve the 25th Year Community
Development Block Grant Application Proposals for FY 1999/00
PREPARED BY:
Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst'
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the Community Development Block Grant
(GDBG) funding recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff.
DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City
annually through the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County.
At tonight's City Council meeting the Council must hear and consider comments from the public
regarding the CDBG funding recommendations. The application requests were also reviewed for
eligibility for CDBG funding by our program representative at the Riverside County Economic
Development Agency and all of the applications are eligible for funding. In order for a project to be
considered for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals:
The activity benefits 51 percent low/moderate income persons; or,
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or,
The activity meets an emergent community development need.
A total of 11 applications were submitted to the City for consideration and all were determined to be
eligible for CDBG funding. The City's allocation for FY99/00 is anticipated to be $285,000. CDBG
regulations impose a 15 percent cap from the total allocation or a maximum expenditure of $42,750
for Public Services. A balance of $242,250 is available for public facilities and capital improvement
projects (refer to table on the following page).
FY 99/00 CDBG ALLOCATION
FUNDING CATEGORY
1999-00 CDBG Allocation
Public Services (15% CAP)
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE
Less Public Services (15% CAP)
Project Funding available for Public
Facilities/I nfrastructure
FUNDING ALLOCATION
$285,000
42,750
$285,000
-42,750
$242,250
Due to the possibility that the City's allocation may be reduced, it is recommended that all projects
be reduced equally, according to the percentage in allocation reduction. All projects are subject
to final approval at a future Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting. The EDA will submit
a supplemental agreement to the City identifying the projects approved for funding in June 1999.
After thorough review, the Finance Committee, composed of Karel Lindemans and Jeff Stone, are
proposing the CDBG funding recommendation described in the attachment.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City,
other than staff time needed to administer program requirements.
Attachment: Finance Committee CDBG Funding Recommendations
Finance Committee CDBG Funding Recommendations
Public.:Services:
Valley Family Support Services
Direct Services/Rape Prevention &
Awareness
Operation School Bell
Emergency Food Aid
Alternatives to Domestic Violence (ADV)
V.I.P. Tots
Boys & Girls Club of Temecula
Community Access Center (CAC)
Parent Center
Total Public Services Projects (15% Cap =
$42,750)
Non-Public Service'.Projects:
Temecula Senior Center Expansion
Old Town Parking & Redevelopment
Improvements
Total Non-Public Service
Funding
Requested
10,000
5,000
10,000
10,000
25,000
6,600
32,400
7,960
5,000
111,960
268,750
150,000
418,750
Finance Committee
Funding
Rec'omme.~ation
0
0
10,000
10,000
7,000
2,000
10,000
2,000
1,750
42,750
242,250
0
242,250
Grand Total
Total Projected CDBG Allocation = 285,000
530,710
285,000
ITEM
2O
APPROVAL
CiTY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
January 26, 1999
Consideration of an Ordinance amending Sections 9.14.010 and 9.14.020 of the
Temecula Municipal Code prohibiting the consumption of alcoholic beverages
and the possession of open containers of alcoholic beverages in public places
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 9.14.010 AND
9.14.020 PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES
2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 9.14.010 AND 9.14.020
PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES
BACKGROUND: In April 1997, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 97-07 which added
Sections 9.14.010 and 9.14.020 to the Temecula Municipal Code. These two sections prohibit the
consumption of alcoholic beverages on public or private commercial property and the possession
of open containers of alcoholic beverages on public or private commercial property, unless the
property is subject to a valid permit from the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Department for
consumption of alcoholic beverages or permission is granted by the City. These sections have been
Agendarpt.alcohol2 I
very successful in preventing and controlling drinking by minors and alcohol related problems at
special events.
The revisions to Sections 9.14.010 and 9.14,020 of the Temecula Municipal Code will clarify that
these sections would now apply to "non-residential properties" rather than the current wording of
"commercial shopping centers." This change will provide greater certainty to members of the public
and law enforcement officials as to those locations to which the prohibitions on consumption or
possession of open containers of alcohol will apply. It will also prohibit drinking of alcoholic
beverages on industrial properties.
A number of public events in various locations within the City are scheduled for the next few months
and therefore, it is necessary that this ordinance take effect immediately so that the benefits and
protections of the ordinance can be effective for these events.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 99-
Ordinance No. 99-
Agendarpt.alcohol2 2
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS
9.14.010 AND 9.14.020 PROHIBITING THE
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND
POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
amended to read as follows:
Section 9.14.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
9.14.010 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public
Prohibited
"The drinking of beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor,
or other alcoholic beverage shall be prohibited at the following locations, unless
specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City:
On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot,
sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated
by the City, County or any public agency;
In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas
accessible to the public of any commorci31 shopping contor; non-
residential property except on the premises of a commercial
establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or
Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility
owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any
public agency.
Section 2. Section 9.14.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
9.14.020
Possession of Open containers of Alcoholic
Beverages in Public Places Prohibited.
"No person shall have in his or her possession, with intent to consume any part
of the contents thereof, any bottle, can or other receptacle containing beer, wine,
liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage,
which has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been
partially removed, at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the
prior written approval of the City:
ords/alcohol.012699 1
On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot,
sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated
by the City, County or any public agency;
In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas
accessible to the public of any commorcial shopping centor; non-
residential property except on the premises of a commercial
establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or
Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility
owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any
public agency.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. The revisions to Sections 9.14.010 and 9.14.020 of the Temecula
Municipal Code will clarify the prohibitions on consuming alcoholic beverages in places
open to the public and possessing open containers of alcoholic beverages in places
open to the public and provide greater certainty to members of the public and law
enforcement officials as to those locations in which the prohibitions on consumption or
possession of open containers of alcohol will apply. A number of public events in
various locations within the City are scheduled for the next few months and therefore, it
is necessary that this ordinance take effect immediately so that the benefits and
protections of the ordinance can be effective for these events.
B. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937, the
City Council hereby finds and determines that a current and immediate threat to the
public health, peace, safety and general welfare exists which necessitates the
immediate enactment of this Ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public
health, peace, safety and general welfare, based upon the facts set forth in this
Ordinance and the facts presented to the Council.
Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise
invalid.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance as an urgency
ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEALJ
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99- , was duly was duly adopted and passed as an urgency
measure at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 26, 1999, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 9.14.010 AND
9.14.020 PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF
OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN
PUBLIC PLACES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9.14.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
9.14.010 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public
Prohibited
"The drinking of beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor,
or other alcoholic beverage shall be prohibited at the following locations, unless
specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City:
On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot,
sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated
by the City, County or any public agency;
In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas
accessible to the public of any comrnorcial shopping contor; non-
residential property except on the premises of a commercial
establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or
Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility
owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any
public agency.
Section 2. Section 9.14.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
9.14.020
Possession of Open containers of Alcoholic
Beverages in Public Places Prohibited.
"No person shall have in his or her possession, with intent to consume any part
of the contents thereof, any bottle, can or other receptacle containing beer, wine,
liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage,
which has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been
partially removed, at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the
prior written approval of the City:
Ords/alcohol(2)012699 1
A. On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or
any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any
public agency;
B. In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas accessible to
the public of any commcrcial shopping contor; non-residential property except on
the premises of a commercial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or
permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or
C. Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility owned,
controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency.
Section 3. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of
the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published
and posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1999.
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99-__, was duly was duly adopted and passed as an urgency
measure at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 26, 1999, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Wo Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM
21
APPROVAL ~
CiTY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE . /
CiTY MANAGER ;~,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
January 26, 1999
Adoption of Urgency Ordinance Suspending Operation of City's Election
Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limitation Ordinance Pending
Resolution Legal Action Challenging the Validity of Proposition 208 and
Resolution Establishing Voluntary Expenditure Ceiling
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SUSPENDING THE OPERATION AND EFFECT OF
ORDINANCE NO. 97-04 AND SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTIONS AND CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES, PENDING
RESOLUTION OF LEGAL CHALLENGES TO THE CALIFORNIA
POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1996 (PROPOSITION 208)
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS OF THE
CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE VOLUNTARY
EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR CITY ELECTIONS, AS ESTABLISHED
IN SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
R;/Agenda Report/Campaign 1
BACKGROUND: The California Political Reform Act of 1996 (Proposition 208) was passed by the
voters of the State of California on November 5, 1996. Among many other requirements, the Act
provides for limits on campaign contributions and authorizes cities to establish voluntary
expenditure ceilings for elective office and the controlled committees of such candidates.
On March 10, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-04 adding Section
2.08.060 to the Temecula Municipal Code establishing a voluntary campaign expenditure ceiling
for elections to city council and providing for an increase in the campaign contribution limits
pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 85400(c), which is part of the California
Political Reform Act of 1996.
On January 6, 1998, United States District Court Judge Lawrence K. Karlton in the case
of California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al, (case no. CIV S-96-1965 LKK/DAD) ruled that the
contribution limits imposed by Proposition 208 are unconstitutional, and he enjoined the Fair
Political Practices Commission from enforcing any part of the measure. The court's decision
regarding the constitutional issues raised in this case is limited to an examination of only the
contribution limits. However, in enjoining enforcement of all of Proposition 208 the court recognized
that the contribution limits are "central" in Proposition 208, and many other provisions depend upon
the validity of those limits.
The Fair Political Practices Commission ("FPPC") ordered its lawyers to immediately
appeal Judge Karlton's entire decision to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition, the
FPPC decided not to seek a stay of Judge Karlton's order enjoining enforcement of the measure,
citing the additional confusion such a stay would likely cause during the 1998 election cycle.
On January 5, 1999, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Judge Karlton to
conduct a full trial on the issues of the case and upheld the preliminary injunction prohibiting the
FPPC from enforcing the provisions of Proposition 208, but did not resolve the legal questions at
issue in the case. At this point in time we do not know when the trial will be held nor when a
judgement will be issued. The Court of Appeals expressed its desire to see the case resolved
expeditiously so that the state's legislative elections in March 2000 would not be affected by
unresolved litigation. We will advise the FPPC that a number of municipal elections will be held in
November 1999 so that if the case is resolved prior to that time, the FPPC will be in a position to
clarify its position on the application of Proposition 208 to the November 1999 elections.
Section 2.08.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code is now unenforceable given the
court's order in California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al. because it implements provisions of
Proposition 208 and relies upon the legal authority of Government Code Section 85400(c) which
is part of Proposition 208, the measure found unconstitutional by the trial court and the
enforcement of which has been enjoined by the court.
If the City Council does not clarify the effect of the court's ruling in California Prolife
Council v. Scullv, et al. upon Ordinance No. 97-04 and Section 2.08.060 of the Temecula Municipal
Code, substantial confusion will occur in the electoral process for the City's November 1999
elections. Section 2.08.060 by its terms would apply to candidates for the November 1999 election
and yet as a result of the injunction in California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al. and the FPPC's
actions in response to this case, the City does not have the authority to enforce this section. An
urgency ordinance, which would take effect immediately, is necessary to clarify that this section will
not affect candidates for the City's November 1999 election at this time.
R:/Agenda Report/Campaign 2
The proposed Urgency Ordinance only suspends the operation and effect of Section
2.08.060 until the legal issues surrounding the validity of the Political Reform Act of 1996 are sorted
out. If the court rules that the Act is constitutional, the City's implementing ordinance will be
effective once again. If the court invalidates the Act, we will return to the Council with a further
report and recommendation for appropriate action.
We are also recommending that the Council adopt the resolution establishing the
number of residents in the City for the purpose of determining the voluntary expenditure limits for
the campaign finance ordinance. Even though enforcement of Proposition 208 has been enjoined
by the court at this time, if the initiative is upheld and the injunction lifted prior to November 1999,
this resolution would be necessary to implement the terms of Section 2.08.060 at that time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Ordinance No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
Agenda Report on Campaign Expenditures, March 18, 1997
Ordinance No. 97-04
R:/Agenda Report/Campaign 3
ORDINANCE NO 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA SUSPENDING THE OPERATION AND
EFFECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 97-04 AND SECTION 2.08.060
OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND CAMPAIGN
EXPENDITURES PENDING RESOLUTION OF LEGAL
CHALLENGES TO THE CALIFORNIA POLITICAL REFORM
ACT OF '1996 (PROPOSITION 208)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMCULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. Proposition 208, "The California Political Reform Act of 1996," (the "Act")
was passed by the voters of the State of California on November 5, 1996. The Act
provides for limits on campaign contributions and authorizes cities to establish voluntary
expenditure ceilings for campaigns for candidates for elective office and the controlled
committees of such candidates.
B. On April 8, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-04 adding
Sections 2.08.060 to the Temecula Municipal Code establishing a voluntary campaign
expenditure ceiling for the campaigns of candidates for election to the city council and
provided for an increase in the campaign contribution limits pursuant to the Act and
specifically Government Code Section 85400(c).
C. On January 6, 1998, United States District Court Judge Lawrence K.
Karlton in the case of California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al (case no. CIV S-96-1965
LKK/DAD) ruled that the contribution limits imposed by the Act are unconstitutional and
he enjoined the Fair Political Practices Commission from enforcing any part of the Act.
D. The Fair Political Practices Commission ("FPPC") ordered its lawyers to
immediately appeal Judge Karlton's entire decision to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals. In addition, the FPPC decided not to seek a stay of Judge Karlton's order
enjoining enforcement of the Act, citing the additional confusion such a stay would likely
cause during the 1998 election cycle.
E. On January 5, 1999, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Judge
Karlton to conduct a full trial on the issues of the case and upheld the preliminary
injunction prohibiting the FPPC from enforcing the provisions of Proposition 208, but did
not resolve the legal questions at issue in the case.
F. Section 2.08.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code is now unenforceable
given the Court's order in California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al. because the legal
R:Ord/campaign ~-
authority for Section 2.08.060 is Government Code Section 85400(c) which is part of Act
which was invalidated by the court and the enforcement of which was enjoined by the
Court.
G. Substantial confusion will occur in the electoral process for the City's
November 1999 elections if the City Council does not clarify the effect of the Court's
ruling in California Prolife Council v. Scully, et al. upon Ordinance No. 97-04 and Section
2.08.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
H. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937, the
City Council hereby finds and determines that a current and immediate threat to the
public health, peace, safety and general welfare exists which necessitates the
immediate enactment of this Ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public
health, peace, safety and general welfare, based upon the facts set forth in this
Ordinance and the facts presented to the Council.
SECTION 2. Pending the resolution of the legal issues concerning The California
Political Reform Act of 1996 in the case of California Prolife Council v. Scullv, et al (case no.
CIV S-96-1965 LKK/DAD) or further action of the Council with respect to this Ordinance, the
operation and effect of Ordinance No. 97-04 and Section 2.08.060 of the Temecula Municipal
Code are hereby suspended.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or word of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decisions shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance, and each
and all provisions thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said provisions may
be declared to be invalid.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance being an Urgency Ordinance shall be effective as of the
date is adopted and shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance as an urgency
ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED, on January 26, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Ord/campaign 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99- , was duly was duly adopted and passed as an urgency
measure at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 26, 1999, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Ord/campaign 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF
RESIDENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DETERMINING THE VOLUNTARY EXPENDITURE
CEILING FOR CITY ELECTIONS, AS ESTABLISHED IN
SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals.
A. Pursuant to the Provisions of "The Political Reform Act of 1996," passed by
the voters as Proposition 208 on the November 5, 1996 statewide ballot, the City Council has
adopted an ordinance establishing a voluntary expenditure ceiling for campaigns for City elective
office.
B. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the voluntary
expenditure ceiling was established at an amount equal to one dollar ($1) per resident of the City
for each election to City elective office.
C. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the City Council is
required to establish by Resolution the number of residents in the City prior to each election for City
elective office.
Section 2. For the exclusive purpose of determining the exact amount of the
voluntary expenditure ceiling for campaigns for City elective office, the City Council hereby finds
that there are 46,500 residents of the City of Temecula, as reflected in the most recent data
provided by the California Department of Finance. Therefore, as established by Temecula
Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the amount of the voluntary expenditure ceiling for campaigns
for City elective office is $46,500 per candidate, per election.
Section 3. The City Council hereby declares that the determination herein shall
apply only to the voluntary expenditure ceiling established in the Temecula Municipal Code, and
shall have no bearing on any other matter.
Section 4.
Ordinance No. 97-04.
This Resolution shall be effective upon the effective date of
Resos elections012699 1
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of
,1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof, held on ,1999, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos elections 012699 2
APPROVAL ~ER(~
'CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
March 18, 1997
Implementation of Provisions of Proposition 208 Enacted by the Voters on
November 5, 1996 Allowing Establishment of Voluntary Campaign Expenditure
Limits and Increased Campaign Contribution Limits for City Elections
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Introduce an Ordinance Entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTION 2.08.060 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR ELECTIONS TO CITY
OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTION LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT
OF 1996 (PROPOSITION 208)"
2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF DETERMINING THE VOLUNTARY EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR CITY
ELECTIONS, AS ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE"
APPROVAL EER~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
March 18, 1997
Implementation of Provisions of Proposition 208 Enacted by the Voters on
November 5, 1996 Allowing Establishment of Voluntary Campaign Expenditure
Limits and Increased Campaign Contribution Limits for City Elections
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Introduce an Ordinance Entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTION 2.08.060 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR ELECTIONS TO CITY
OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTION LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT
OF 1996 (PROPOSITION 208)"
2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF DETERMINING THE VOLUNTARY EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR CITY
ELECTIONS, AS ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE"
DISCUSSION:
Proposition 208, adopted by voters of California at the November 5, 1996 election,
extensively amends the campaign provisions of the Political Reform Act. Effective January 1,
1997, the amount which persons, other than political party committees and small contributor
committees, may contribute to a candidate or to a candidate's controlled committee are strictly
limited. In jurisdictions with fewer than 100,000 residents, such as Temecula, the campaign
contribution limit will be $1 O0 per election, per candidate, unless voluntary expenditure limits
are enacted.
Proposition 208 also creates voluntary expenditure ceilings and incentives to encourage
candidates to accept those limits. Proposition 208 does not reouire that voluntary limits be in
place in local jurisdictions, but rather permits each city and county to establish voluntary
expenditure ceilings in any amount of one dollar ($1) or less per resident for each election in
the jurisdiction. If the City adopts a voluntary expenditure ceiling, candidates must file a
statement of acceptance or rejection of the ceiling before accepting any contributions. If the
candidate accepts the expenditure limitations, the per person contribution limit for council
elections in Temecula would be increased to $250 per election per candidate from the $100
described above.
In order to implement these provisions of Proposition 208 relating to the voluntary
expenditure limits and the increased contribution limits, the Council would need to enact an
ordinance establishing these provisions. The proposed ordinance providing for voluntary
expenditure limits is in conforman~'e with Proposition 208 and includes the following provisions:
Establish a voluntary expenditure ceiling of $1 per resident of the City for each
election. Currently, the limit would be $42,400. The limit could be established
at a lower level but a different level should be based on data or evidence which
would support a lower level. A vote of the people is required to set the ceiling
higher than $1 per resident.
Require that the City Council establish the number of residents in the City for
purposes of the voluntary expenditure ceiling at least seven (7) months prior to
each City election.
Require that candidates execute a statement accepting or rejecting the voluntary
expenditure ceiling before accepting any contributions.
Provide that those candidates who accept the voluntary expenditure ceiling will
be subject to a contribution limit of $250 per contributor, rather than $1 O0 per
contributor, as established by Proposition 208.
Require that the City Clerk designate in ballot materials which candidates have
accepted the voluntary expenditure ceiling, as provided in Proposition 208.
Provide that only the penalties prescribed in State law apply to violations of the
ordinance. No local penalty or enforcement action will apply.
R:\Agenda. Rpt\Prop208 2
The Council may also wish to consider whether to provide an additional optional
incentive to those candidates who accept the local voluntary expenditure ceiling, should one
be adopted. Proposition 208 provides to State candidates the additional incentive of a free
candidate's statement in sample ballot materials for those candidates who accept the voluntary
expenditure ceiling. Proposition 208 does not require that local jurisdictions supply this
incentive. However, some attorneys have argued that an additional incentive would
strengthen the argument that the ordinance complies with Constitutional requirements for
voluntary expenditure limits. The City Clerk estimates the cost of the candidate's statement
to be approximately $500 per candidate.
The City Council must determine whether it intends to impose the voluntary expenditure
ceiling permitted by Proposition 208 and, if so, in what amount. Further, if the City Council
declines to take any action regarding this matter, the campaign contribution limit established
by Proposition 208 will continue in effect. Again, that limit is $1 O0 per election, per candidate,
rather than the $250 limit which would take effect if the Council adopts a local expenditure
ceiling, for those candidates who accept the ceiling.
R:\Agenda. Rpt\Prop208 3
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADDING SECTION 2.08.050 TO ~
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
VOLUNTARY CAMPMGN EXPENDITURE CEHJNG FOR
F-LFCTIONS TO CITY OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR
AN INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION
LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL
REFORM ACT OF 199~ (PROPOSITION 208)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_,CULA DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. "The California Political P~form Act of 1996" passed by the voters as
Proposition 208 on November 5, 1996, permits cities to establish voluntary expenditure
ceilings for candidates for elective office and the controlled committees of such candidates.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 85400(c), effective January 1, 1997, such a
local voluntary expenditure ceiling may be established in any mount not to exceed one dollar
($1) per resident of the jurisdiction.
Section ~..
read as follows:
Section ~.68.050 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to
Article III. Election Campaign
"Section 2.08.060. Election campaigns. Voluntary Expenditure
Ceiling.
(a) Pursuant to Government Code Section 85400(c), a voluntary expenditure
ceiling is hereby established for each candidate in each election to City elective
office in an mount equal to one dollar ($1) per resident of the City. As used in
this Section, the term "City elective office" shah mean the offices of Member of
the City Council.
(b) The City Council shah determine the number of residents in the City for the
purposes of this Section by resolution adopted not less than seven (7) months
prior to each regular City election.
(c) Prior to accepting any contributions, each candidate for City elective office
shall file with the City Clerk a statement of acceptance or rejection of the
voluntary expenditure ceiling established herein.
970221 11086-00001 lid 1480383 0
(d) No candidate for City elective office who accepts the voluntary expenditure
ceiling established herein and no controlled campaign committee of such a
candidate shall make campaign expenditures cumulatively in excess of the
voluntary expenditure ceiling established herein.
(e) Each candidate who rejects the voluntary expenditure cei/ing established
herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85301, as the same may be mended from time to time.
(f) Each candidate who accepts the voluntary expenditure ceiling established
herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85402, and not the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85301, as either section may be amended from time to time. In
addition, as to each such candidate the City Clerk shall provide notification to
voters that the candidate has accepted the voluntary expenditure ceiling
established herein, as required by Government Code Section 85602 and any
applicable regulations.
(g) Except as provided herein, the provisions of the California Political Reform
Acts of 1974 and 1996, Government Code Sections 81000, gl_aml. (collectively,
"the Acts"), and applicable regulations adopted pursuant thereto, as the same
may be amended from time to time, shall govern the interpretation and
application of this Section.
(h) The penalties and remedies for violations of this Section shall be those set
forth in the Acts."
Section 3. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise
invalid.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required by law.
970221 11086-00001 tjd 1480383 0 - 2 -
(d) No candidate for City elective office who accepts the voluntary expenditure
ceiling established herein and no controlled campaign committee of such a
candidate shall make campaign expenditures cumulntively in excess of the
voluntary expenditure ceiling established herein.
(e) ~:neh candidate who rejects the voluntary expenditure ceiling established
herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85301, as the same may be mended from time to time.
(f) Each candidate who accepts the voluntary expenditure ceiling established
herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85402, and not the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85301, as either section may be amended from time to time. In
addition, as to each such candidate the City Clerk shall provide notification to
voters that the candidate has accepted the voluntary expenditure ceiling
established herein, as required by Government Code Section 85602 and any
applicable regulations.
(g) Except as provided herein, the provisions of the California Political Reform
Acts of 1974 and 1996, Government Code Sections 81000, ~d~tllll. (collectively,
"the Acts"), and. applicable regulations adopted pursuant thereto, as the same
may be amended from time to time, shall govern the interpretation and
application of this Section.
(h) The penalties and remedies for violations of this Section shall be those set
forth in the Acts.'
Section 3. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise
invalid.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required by law.
970221 lI086-0G(X)I ~ 1480383
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLIgH1NG ~ NUMBER OF RESIDENTS OF THg
CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE VOLUNTARY
EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR CITY FJ,F£TIONS, AS ESTABLISHgr}
IN SECTION 2.08.060 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECU~A DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals.
A. Pursuant to the Provisions of "The Political Reform Act of 1996,"
passed by the voters as Proposition 208 on the November 5, 1996 statewide ballot, the City
Council has adopted an ordinance establishing a voluntary expenditure ceiling for campaigns
for City elective office.
B. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the voluntary
expenditure ceiling was established at an amount equal to one dollar ($1) per resident of the
City for each election to City elective office.
C. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the City
Council is required to establish by Resolution the number of residents in the City prior to each
election for City elective office.
Section 2. For the exclusive purpose of determining the exact mount of the
voluntary expenditure ceiling for campaigns for City elective office, the City Council hereby
finds that there are 42,400 residents of the City of Temecula, as reflected in the most recent
data provided by the California Department of Finance. Therefore, as established by
Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.08.060, the amount of the voluntary expenditure ceiling
for campaigns for City elective office is $42,400 per candidate, per election.
Section 3. The City Council hereby declares that the determination herein
shall apply only to the voluntary expenditure ceiling established in the Temecula Municipal
Code, and shall have no bearing on any other matter.
Section 4.
Ordinance No. 97-
This Resolution shall be effective upon the effective date of
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
970221 110864Xl001 tjd 148038] 0
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1997.
Patrich H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, JUNE S. GREF~K, Cit~ Clerk of the City of Temecula hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on , 1997, by the
following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
97o22x uo~,-oooox ~ x4a~ss 0 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF~D this 18th day of March, 1997.
Patrich H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATI~ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
$$
I, JUNE S. GREEK, Citi Clerk of the City of Temecula hereby certify that the
foregoing Remlution No. 97- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on , 1997, by the
following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMF~MBERS
ABSE, NT: COUNCILMF~MBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
9'7ozzx xmos6-oooom ~ ~,ssoss5 o - 2 -
of
PASSI~,n, APPROVED AND ADOPT~ this
,1997.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall
Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDED ) ss.
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greel~, ~ity Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 18th day of March, 1997, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 251h
day of March, 1997 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
970221 IIO~-OOCOI t~! 1480383 0 - 3 -
ORDINANCE NO. 97-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING SECTION 2.08.060 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR
ELECTIONS TO CITY OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR AN
INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF
1996 (PROPOSITION 208)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. "The California Political Reform Act of 1996" passed by the voters as
Proposition 208 on November 5, 1996, permits cities to establish voluntary expenditure
ceilings for candidates for elective office and the controlled committees of such candidates.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 85400(c), effective January 1, 1997,
such a local voluntary expenditure ceiling may be established in any amount not to exceed
one dollar ($1) per resident of the jurisdiction.
Section 2.
read as follows:
Section 2.08.060 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to
Article III. Election Campaign
"Section 2.08.060. Election campaigns. Voluntary Expenditure
Ceiling.
(a) Pursuant to Government Code Section 85400(c), a voluntary expenditure
ceiling is hereby established for each candidate in each election to City
elective office in an amount equal to one dollar ($1) per resident of the City.
As used in this Section, the term "City elective office" shall mean the offices
of Member of the City Council.
(b) The City Council shall determine the number of residents in the City for
the purposes of this Section by resolution adopted not less than seven (7)
months prior to each regular City election.
Ords\97-04 1
(c) Prior to accepting any contributions, each candidate for City elective
office shall file with the City Clerk a statement of acceptance or rejection of
the voluntary expenditure ceiling established herein.
(d) No candidate for City elective office who accepts the voluntary
expenditure ceiling established herein and no controlled campaign
committee of such a candidate shall make campaign expenditures
cumulatively in excess of the voluntary expenditure ceiling established
herein.
(e) Each candidate who rejects the voluntary expenditure ceiling established
herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in Government Code
Section 85301, as the same may be amended from time to time.
(f) Each candidate who accepts the voluntary expenditure ceiling
established herein shall be subject to the contribution limit set forth in
Government Code Section 85402, and not the contribution limit set forth in
Government Code Section 85301, as either section may be amended from
time to time. In addition, as to each such candidate the City Clerk shall
provide notification to voters that the candidate has accepted the voluntary
expenditure ceiling established herein, as required by Government Code
Section 85602 and any applicable regulations.
(g) Except as provided herein, the provisions of the California Political
Reform Acts of 1974 and 1996, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.
(collectively, "the Acts"), and applicable regulations adopted pursuant
thereto, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall govern the
interpretation and application of this Section.
(h) The penalties and remedies for violations of this Section shall be those
set forth in the Acts."
Section 3. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published
and posted in the manner required by law.
Ords\97-04 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of April, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDED ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-04 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 18th day of March, 1997, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council on the 8th day of April, 1997 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone,
Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
Orals\97-04 3
ITEM
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~~/Yvv''
January 26, 1999
Recommendations for Implementing Economic Development Strategy
Report by Dr. John Husing
RECOMMENDATION:
Implement recommendations of the Husing Economic Development Strategy report as outlined
in the following staff report.
BACKGROUND:
On December 8, 1998, John Husing presented his "Economic Development Strategy" report to the
City Council. Dr. Husing presented a vadety of economic and demographic data, and also made a
number of findings and recommendations. This report presents Dr. Husings findings and
recommendations and presents staff's recommendations for each of the issue areas discussed by
Dr. Husing.
Husing Report Findings
In a strategic planning study, it is typical to assess an organization's strengths and weaknesses. The
purpose of such an exercise is to allow the organization to build upon its strengths, and to take steps
to mitigate its weaknesses. Correspondingly, Dr. Husing noted a number of strengths and
weaknesses related to the City's overall economic position. These strengths and weaknesses are
summarized below and form the basis of Dr. Husing's recommendations.
I I
i Temecula's Strengths Temecula's Weaknesses I
~ I
High quality of life - excellent schools, low
cdme rate, numerous and well-kept parks.
Relatively low housing pdces (compared to
coastal areas)
Strategically located between San Diego and
Orange County/Los Angeles markets.
Relatively remote from colleges and universities.
Rapid population growth. Job growth lags
population increases, resulting in long commutes
for many workers. Traffic congestion.
Higher transportation costs than communities
closer to ocean and rail terminals. Lack of brine
line.
Husing report. council jan 26,99 1
Temecula's Strengths
~ Temecula's Weaknesses
Relatively high personal income of residents,
and relatively high taxable retail sales (and
sales tax receipts)
Temecula has relatively highly trained
workers, and many of these workers have
indicated a willingness to work for somewhat
lower wages if long job commutes could be
eliminated
Strong tourism base, cooling ocean breezes,
excellent climate for growing of wine grapes
Relatively high land costs for industrial land
(compared to other Inland Empire areas)
Long commute times for workers
"Primary" jobs offer the greatest economic
multiplier effect. Eastside reservoir may increase
traffic congestion.
Study Conclusions / Staff Recommendations
Following is a listing of the issues and recommendations as presented in Dr. Husing's report These
are presented in the same order and numbering as the report. The corresponding staff
recommendations are presented next to each of Dr. Husing's recommendations.
Husing Report Issues I
Recommendation
' I Staff Recommendation
#4. What is the Gi{imate objective of "Development of pdmary jobs (typically industrial
Temecula's economic development uses) should be a pdmary objective of the City's
program? economic development program. This is consistent
with current programs and policies. For example,
Goal #1 of the City's Economic Development
Element of the General Plan calls for "Development
of a strong base of clean manufacturing activities
which employs a skilled labor force and can be
successfully integrated into Temecula's community
character".
Rec.: The City Council should adopt a
policy statement that Temecula's economic
development program makes the expansion
of "economic base" sectors its pdmary
objective.
Although this is a good overall objective, it would be
helpful to refine this statement. Our overall objective
should also be coordinated with any economic
development incentive policies of the City. Staff
recommends that a more refined statement of
objectives and general guidelines for incentives be
discussed with EDC members and then the
Economic Development subcommittee of the City
Council. The recommended policy would then be
sent to the full City Council for discussion and
adoption. Specific incentives would continue to be
discussed on a case-by-case basis with the
Council/Redevelopment Agency.
Although creation of pdmary jobs is important, a
healthy economic base should consist of strong
Husing reportcouncil.jan 26,99 2
Husing Report Issues I
iRecommendation
#5. An independent derivation of industrial
data is needed: covering industrial space
inventory, rate of space absorption, square
footage of vacant/about to be vacant space
and comparison of lease rates.
Rec.: That the City contract with an
"outside" commercial real estate firm to
develop such a database.
#7. Temecula should engage Mumeta and
area water districts in discussions of how to
fund and build a 14 mile brine line to
Railroad Canyon Road at the 1-15.
Rec.: The City Council should consider
appointing a Council Committee to meet
with board members of the Eastern MWD to
start the process of putting the city in the
planning loop on bdne line matters.
Staff Recommendation
tourism, retail and service segments as well. Even
within the industrial classifications, some diversity is
good so as to avoid a "boom or bust" economy. The
City should periodically monitor its overall
employment base to ensure that a balance of jobs is
being provided.
Finally, "quality of life" is an important factor in many
companies' decisions to relocate or expand.
Temecula should not compromise its commitment to
a safe community, environmental safeguards,
cultural opportunities, and an attractive place to live
and work in its quest to create jobs. To do so could
be shortsighted.
Such a database is needed and should be
developed. Local brokers have offered to assist with
development of such a database. Staff has initiated
discussions with local brokers to try to develop this
database.
City staff members have met with staff of the Rancho
Water District. At this time, Rancho does not have
need for a brine line. That could change in the
future, should Rancho ever decide to filter water
through reverse osmosis treatment. Rancho has no
such plans at this time, however.
Staff should meet with the Manufacturers Council,
Intemational Rectifier, Eastem Municipal Water
District and possibly others to determine the need for
and value of such a line. The potential use, location,
benefits, costs and high water use are just some of
the factors that should be considered in determining
whether the City should pursue construction of such
a line.
#8. Information exchanges and brain
storming among professionals from local
cities and water agencies should occur
among the local cities and the water
agencies about how to mitigate the high
infrastructure costs.
Rec.: Open a dialog about creating regular
meetings and/or pedodic workshops where
city and water agency staffs could share
Staff from Temecula and the water districts currently
have some interaction, typically as part of the
development review process. A number of City staff
members will be meeting with Rancho staff to better
understand the overall structure and mission of each
agency. This meeting is scheduled for February 2,
1999.
Staff from Eastem had previously approached City
staff about making a presentation to the City Council
Husing report.council,jan 26,99 3
Husing Report Issues I
Recommendation
information and build relationships.
#9. Eastern and Rancho allow developers
to spread the cost of their fees over time.
The interest rate is 10% and pdme,
respectively. This is higher than their
borrowing rate or rate on retum on their
investments through the Local Agency
Investment Fund.
Rec.: Initiate discussions with the water
agencies to explore lower interest rates for
developers.
#3. How can Temecula's highly trained
commuter-workers, who are willing to work
for a little less to avoid ddving long
distances, be identified, quantified, and
information about them used to recruit
employers to the city?
Rec.: Develop a system (probably internet-
based) to post job openings and
confidentially allow prospective workers to
respond. The system should also be
capable of compiling summary statistics that
can be used in economic development
efforts.
#6. City policies can affect the costs of
doing business in the City. This, in tum, can
make migration of "basic tier' industries
more or less likely, depending on the City's
Husing report.council.jan 26,99
Staff Recommendation
regarding their fee structure. This presentation is
tentatively scheduled for the first Council meeting in
February.
The EDC of Southwest Riverside County is also
examining their operating structure and has
recognized the value in trying to include Rancho and
Eastern as part of the EDC.
City staff has met with the staff of Rancho Califomia
Water distdct regarding this issue. Rancho staff
indicated a willingness to explore this issue with their
board. Staff will initiate similar discussions with
Eastern.
Explore such an interactive system as
recommended. Obtaining a qualified labor force is a
cdtical question for prospective (and existing)
employers. Although it appears that the technology
is available for such a system, the larger questions of
obtaining the information, maintaining this database,
and publicizing the data must be answered before
such a system would be truly useful.
Several steps are already underway that will help
provide this type of information. Temecula has been
working with the County of Riverside, San Jacinto
Community College, the EDC and others to create a
"one stop" employment and training center in
Temecula. This center is expected to open in
approximately three months. In addition, Riverside
County is developing a system of job kiosks
throughout the County, with two such kiosks planned
for Temecula. These kiosks will host a variety of job.
related information and will also provide access to
sponsors' web pages. Temecula will be one of the
sponsors of these kiosks.
Although somewhat different than proposed by Dr.
Husing, the Press-Enterprise will be hosting a job fair
in Apdl. The Press-Enterprise is working with the
EDC as well as the City in sponsoring this event.
In a recent survey of development impact fees,
Temecula's were found to be in the mid to upper
middle range of such fees. However, these fees are
used to construct public infrastructure, such as
IHusing Report Is'~ues i
Recommendation
policies.
Rec.: Examine the City's fees and work to
make these fees less costly than other
areas so as to improve Temecula's cost-
competitivehess.
Staff Recommendation
streets, and investment in such facilities is critical to
the long-term well being of the community.
One method to try to minimize these costs is for
Temecula to continue to seek grant funding to help
provide needed capital facilities. Temecula has been
successful in obtaining grant funding for several of its
major roadway projects.
At the time that Council approved raising
development impact fees, Council expressed
concem that residential properties may not be paying
the full costs of providing needed public facilities.
Staff is currently exploring the feasibility of updating
our development impact fee study to address this
issue and will report back to the Council on the
process and costs for conducting such an update.
Temecula's business license fees are substantially
less than other cities surveyed. This information is
included in our materials that are provided to firms
interested in locating in Temecula.
Staff should survey other communities to determine
Temecula's relative cost of providing other
development-related fees (e.g. plan check). While
fees for these services are typically based on the
cost of providing such services, fees that are
substantially lower or higher than other communities
could indicate a need to review of our processes (if
our fees are higher), or could be used in our
marketing materials (if our fees are lower).
Finally, the speed of development review can be
even more important than the fees for some
businesses. Temecula's fast-track process is
featured in our business brochures and will continue
to be an important part of the City's economic
development efforts. City staff also work, on an
ongoing basis, with the business community and
organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce
and the EDC to address development-related issues.
#13. Should there be changes in the
structure of Temecula's economic
development effort?.
Rec.: Using information from the State
EDD, Temecula should work with the EDC
to pdodtize firms for business retention
efforts.
Regular meetings between the EDC, Chamber, and
City staff have been initiated. These meetings are
ongoing and are used to exchange information and
to examine areas of increased coordination and
cooperation. We are currently reviewing our "leads"
programs, and an upcoming meeting will
systematically review our intemet web pages to
better coordinate these efforts.
Husing report.council.jan 26,99
The EDC does have an active and well-organized
5
i Husing Report Issues i
IRecommendation
Staff Recommendation
business retention program, and City staff has been
attending these meetings on a regular basis. Staff
has also stated that they are available to attend site
visits by the EDC. Some such meetings have
occurred, and it is expected that this involvement will
increase. Staff has used certain property and sales
tax information to help the EDC develop contact lists.
Staff plans to continue and expand this effort by
using EDD data (with appropriate confidentiality
measures) to help develop pdodty contact lists.
The EDC has also appointed a subcommittee (which
includes City staff) to explore methods that existing
businesses might be recognized.
Recommendations of this subcommittee will be
brought to the Economic Development
Subcommittee and full City Council as appropriate.
#14. What industry classifications should
Temecula target in its efforts to expand
Temecula's economy?
Rec.: Target the following ten sectors, and
using EDD data, contact firms in these
classifications to help focus future economic
development activities. These sectors are:
It is appropriate to "target" businesses for surveys
and site visits. Target sectors should be reviewed
with the Council subcommittee as part of refinement
of the overall economic development objective (see
first recommendation), as well as the EDC.
Mfg: Electronic Equipment
Mfg: Pdnting and Publishing
Construction: General
Nonresidential Bldg.
Mfg: Pdmary & Fabricated Metals
Basic Service: VVholesale Electronics
Construction: Other Specialty Contractors
Mfg: Instruments and Related
Basic Service: VVholesale Medical
Mfg: Industrial Machinery
Basic Service: VVholesale Plastic,
Chemical, Petroleum
#1. Increased participation by Mt. San
Jacinto College with local businesses is
needed.
Rec.: Contact Mr. Eugene Kadow,
Chairman of the Mt. San Jacinto College
Board of Trustees to begin exploring
opportunities for increased participation by
Mt. San Jacinto College in economic
Husing reportcouncil.jan 26,99
Contractors-
Mt. San Jacinto College staff has been involved in
development of the "One Stop" project. Staff has not
yet initiated contact with Mr. Kadow, but has
previously met with Dean King of the business
school at Mt. San Jacinto. City Council may prefer to
initiate such contact, or could direct staff to initiate
the contact with Mr. Kadow.
Staff has initiated discussions with Dennis Frank, of
: Husing Report Issues I
Recommendation
development activities.
#10. Temecula should identify projects for
inclusion in any future Measure A list of
pdodty projects.
Rec.: Continue participation in the
Riverside County Transportation
Commission.
#11. An easier commute between Mumeta
and Temecula has advantages for both
communities.
Rec.: Explore methods to begin a dialog on
circulation issues with the City of Mumeta.
#12. The Eastside Reservoir will affect
Temecula - most notably through increased
toudsm and increased traffic.
Rec.: Temecula should become involved
with the Metropolitan Water Distdct's
advisory groups.
Staff Recommendation
the UC Riverside Extension, regarding training
programs for new and existing businesses. UC
Riverside currently will provide custom training
programs, and is interested in working with the City,
the EDC, and possibly Mt. San Jacinto Community
College to develop materials to include in our
economic development marketing efforts. Mr. Frank
has also indicated an interest in participating in site
visits with existing and prospective firms where such
firms have an interest in training programs. Staff has
also worked with other Universities, including the
University of Redlands, Cal State San Bemardino,
and Cal State San Marcos on educational programs.
Agree with Dr. Husing. Councilmember Roberts has
been very active in the RCTC, and other
Councilmembers are also active in regional
commissions. In addition, continue to pursue
opportunities for grant funding, and work with the
Riverside County staff and Board of Supervisors to
try to ensure that appropriate measures are provided
to help mitigate impacts from projects outside of the
City of Temecula.
In addition to roadway projects, the City should work
to provide alternative methods of transportation and
congestion reduction. These include land use
planning, providing bicycle trails, encouragement of
carpooling and staggered work hours for employers,
and improved public transportation including
development of a high-speed rail line.
Such a dialog is essential to solving regional traffic
issues. Council has expressed an interest in
beginning such a dialog and has appointed Mayor
Ford and Councilmember Roberts as the City's
liaison to the City of Muraleta.
Staff is now attempting to arrange a tour for Council
and staff of the Eastside reservoir project. Staff and
the Council have monitored this project for some
time as it does have the potential to significantly
affect Temecula and the surrounding communities
FISCAL IMPACT:
The recommendations outlined above are based on current staffing and resources and are not
expected to create a significant fiscal impact at this time.
Husing report. council,jan 26,99 7
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER .,' , z~'''
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage/i ;-~. '-
January 26, 1999
SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
Economic Development
The Southwest Riverside County EDC attended the Western Plastics Expo in January
at the Long Beach Convention Center. The EDC received free passes to attend this
expo which showcased more than 200 of the industry's leading suppliers in the plastics
industry. As the EDC toured the exhibit, Judi Staats distributed material on our region
to selected companies. The type of businesses and attendees that attended this expo
merits for Temecula to exhibit at this show next year.
Dr. John Husing's final report on Temecula's Economic Development Strategy is
completed. Jim O'Grady has held meetings to discuss and receive input on this report
with the Council's Economic Development Sub-Committee, EDC, Eastern Municipal
Water District, Rancho California Water District as well as other groups.
The Riverside County Kiosk Network
The Riverside County Economic Development Agency and Workforce Development
Board have established a multimedia, interactive kiosk network. This network of 40
kiosks, placed strategically throughout the county, is an invaluable resource for job-
seekers, employers, residents, visitors and tourists alike. The kiosks contain information
on:
· Jobs, training & education
· Government & other community resources
· Local businesses
· Transportation
· Tourism and entertainment
The City of Temecula will be participating in this program and will receive two kiosks
which will be located at the Temecula Library and the Department of Social Services.
City staff and the EDC will be compiling the information for the kiosks.
An article for the SW Riverside County EDC newsletter "The View" was prepared by
City staff. The theme of the issue focused on the success of Southwest Riverside
County over the last six months. Temecula's real estate activity will be highlighted.
The County of Riverside EDA is preparing a brochure highlighting the County.
City staff and the EDC will be coordinating with them on the development of this
marketing piece.
A meeting was held with City staff and members of the City's marketing committee on
the City's Website. To avoid duplication, various topics were distributed among the
Chamber of Commerce and the EDC. As this is an on-going project the website will be
updated and enhanced on a regular basis.
Leads and Inquiries
In the month of December, the City responded to 11 inquiries. Information regarding
Industrial Bonds was sent to one firm. The IEEP leads will be followed-up by the EDC
on a quarterly basis.
Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building
can now be found in the Community Development Department report.
Economic Development and Housing staff are also working on a Corporate Relocation
Housing Assistance Program which will be brought to the Council on January 26,
1999.
Tourism
City staff compiled a list of bus companies, destination management companies, tour
operators, travel writers, concierges and Convention & Visitors Bureaus to target for
local familiarization (ram) tours and for tourism related mailings. The City met with the
Chamber to set up scheduled fam tours of Temecula which will begin in March. During
the months of March through June there will be six fam tours scheduled.
The City was contacted by Susan Sullivan, Temecula's Membership Sales
Representative for San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau, regarding bringing a group
tour to Temecula. The City provided her with updated tourism and winery material. She
has started a side business called Tour San Diego that is proving successful. One
benefit the City receives from CONVIS is that our literature is included on travel
proposals.
Gloria Wolnick now serves on the Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) Board of
Directors. The IETC and the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) is forming a
closer affiliation. The IETC Board of Directors will continue to function in an advisory
capacity. The IEEP Board will have final approval after review by the advisory board.
The Board meeting scheduled for January 20 will focus on the new IETC marketing plan
and budget for the region. The annual IETC meeting is also scheduled for the same
day at the Arrowhead Springs Conference Center.
City staff is in the process of updating the City's Tourism Press Kit. The kit is
scheduled to be completed mid-February.
City Staff has met with the Chamber of Commerce and the Vintner's Association
regarding updating the City's tourism marketing plan. The recommendations will be
discussed further with the entire marketing committee at the next marketing meeting in
February.
Monthly calendar of events continue to go out to the media.
Attachments:
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Report
Southwest Riverside County EDC Report
Temecula Valley Film Council Report
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
January 13, 1999
Sha~vn Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula CA 92590
Dear Shawn:
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of
Temecula. This is the month of December at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights
· 8 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula.
Committee Highlights
· Membership Committee' s Chamber Ambassadors attended 8 ribbon cuttings.
· The Tourism Committee is actively working on a "group package" for Temecula.
· Local Business Promotions Committee is hosting Success Seminar Series, featuring Dr. David
Forbes, president of The Forbes Consulting Group of Boston, MA., and nationally kno~vn
consumer research consultant will address such issues as: "How do I get attention for my
business in today's crowded marketplace? .... How do I grow my business the most, with the
least difficulty?" Strategic Consumer Marketing seminar will be held January 26, 1999 at
Temeku Hills Country Club, 11:30 a.m.-l:30 p.m.
· The Ways & Means Committee is pleased to announce the 1999 State of the City address by
Temecula's Mayor Steven Ford and City Staff on March 4, 1999 at Temeku Hills Country
Club. 11:30 a.m. Paseo Del Sol and Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon & Rose will sponsor this
year's State of the City Address.
Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
· 400 Temecula Brochures and 300 Old Town Maps to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center for
distribution to tourists.
· 200 City Maps to Forest City Management Inc. for promotion of the mall.
· 75 City Maps to the City of Temecula for distribution to staff and the general public.
· 50 Travel Packets, 50 Old Town Maps and 50 Winery Brochures to Solana Ridge for
distribution to new tenants.
· 50 Travel Packets and 30 Visitor Guides to the Fallbrook Country Inn for distribution to
guests.
40 Visitor Guides to the Temecula Valley Inn for distribution to guests.
25 Old Town Maps, 25 School Brochures, 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to
Prudential California Realty for distribution to clients.
· 25 Travel Packets, 25 Old To~qa Maps, 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to the
Educational Development Trust Resource for distribution to foreign exchange students visiting
Temecula.
· 25 Travel Packets and 25 Visitor Guides to Donna Van Horn for an overnight stay in
Temecula.
· 20 Visitor Guides to Best Western Guest House for distribution to guests.
· 15 Travel Packets to Renaissance Executive Forum for distribution to guests staying at the
Pala Mesa Resort.
Activity Report
· Overall Tourism phone calls are up 7.63 percent from last year.
· Overall phone calls are up 39.3 percent from last year.
· Overall walk-ins are up 43.72 percent from last year.
Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Local Business Promotions, Tourism, Education,
Ways and Means. If you have any question regarding this information, please contact me at the
Chamber.
Sincerely,
Alice Sullivan
President/CEO
CC:
Mayor Steven J. Ford
Mayor Pro Tern Jeffery E. Stone
Councilman Jeff Comerchero
Councilman Karel F. Lindemans
Councilman Ronald H. Roberts
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
TVCC Board of Directors
PHONE CALLS TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS
Calendar of Events
Special Events
General Information
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
CHAMBER REFERRALS
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS TOURISM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
SPECIAL EVENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL WALK-INS
MAILINGS
TOURISM
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
TOTAL MAILINGS
E-MAIL
TOURISM
RELOCATION
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL E-MAIL
GRAND TOTALS
PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS
MAILINGS
E-MAIL
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
For December, 1998
Chamber Vis. Center
This Month This Month
Total
Year-To-Date
299
63
356
608
1,326
81
33
1,437
9,378
122
12,377
4979
1121
4377
10,389
20,866
1911
691
18,771
88,373
1710
111,456
111
58
26
405
123
42
635
80
1,480
66
0
0
66
2
0
0
0
134
2,718
1034
772
6,968
1891
796
9,990
823
24,992
115
64
78
257
2280
1312
1114
4,706
16
15
27
58
THIS MONTH
12,377
1,480
257
58
YEAR-TO-DATE
132,322
23,926
4,660
58
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber
December, 1997
Chamber
December, 1998
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 454 299
Calendar of Events 70 63
Special Events 297 356
* General Information 411 608
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,232 1,326
RELOCATION 79 81
DEMOGRAPHICS 20 33
CHAMBER 1,590 1,437
CHAMBER REFERRALS 5,925 9,378
MISCELLANEOUS 50 122
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 8,896 12,377
Percentage
Increase
-34.14
-10.00
19.87
47.93
7.63
2.53
65.00
-9.62
58.28
144.00
39.13
WALK-INS
TOURISM 79 111 40.51
* CALENDAR OF EVENTS 36 58 61.11
* SPECIAL EVENTS 33 26 -21.21
* GENERAL INFORMATION 86 405 370.93
RELOCATI ON 120 123 2.50
* DEMOGRAPHICS 35 42 20.00
CHAMBER 718 635 -11.56
* MISCELLANEOUS. 16 80 400.00
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS N/A 134 N/A
TOTAL WALK-INS 1,123 1,614 43.72
MAILINGS
TOURISM 80 115 43.75
RELOCATION 51 64 25.49
DEMOGRAPHICS 40 78 95.00
TOTAL MAILINGS 171 257 50.29
E-MAIL
TOURISM N/A
RELOCATION N/A
MISCELLANEOUS N/A
* Categories adjusted in 1998 to more accurately track volume.
16
15
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
I'Friday January 15, 1999 5:49pm -- From '909 695 5126' -- Page 2}
1-15-1999 ,E:O1PH ~ TEIvECLLA VALLEY EDC 9E~9 ~ E12E~
P, 2
Janua~ 15,1999
Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
P,O, Box 9033
Ternecula, CA 92589-9033
RE: EDC Contract - Activity Summary
The fOllOwing highlights the activities of the EDC dudng the month of December.
Business Develop..,m, ent
The EDC responded to four inquiries generated by magazine ads placed by the
City of Temecula from Site Selection and Outlook Magazine. A broke with
Coldwell Banker visited the office with a client requesting information on Mumeta
only. Demographic packages were given to four area brokers. Out of area
broker was given information for 100,000 sf building in Temecula, A request for
site assistance from a film production company was received. Project required
high tech manufacturing atmosphere, Referral given to area manufacturer's_
Two leads were received from California Trade and Commerce. An architectural
fabrication glass plant requiring a 200,000 sq, fL building and two
inbound/outbound call centers looking for 30,000 sf or larger were responded to
with demographic, labor, job training, and site packages.
Marketing Outreach
EDC staff aftended the Inland Empire Economic Forecast Breakfast presented by
UCR and the A. Gary Anderson Graduate School of Management, Staats
attended the Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce EDC luncheon
meeting. Staats artended the meeting hosted by the City of Temecula for all area
real estate brokers on December 3, '1998, The meeting focused on marketing
efforts and discussion of land and building costs- Staats and President Bonnie
Hanna artended the 11m Annual Most I~inovative new Produds Award Luncheon
as a guest of Temecula CONNECT. The CONNECT program is establishing a
I'o~ ()lTicc I~x i!¢A~ · 'l~:xzEcula, C'-,X 92593-1:N · Of. ticc 909/695,51.-~ - FAX 909/695-5126
/Friday ,January 15, 1999 5:49pm -- From '909 695 5126' -- Page
1--1F-,--1999 E:O2F~ FROM TEIv~CLLA VAIIF'Y ~ ~ ~ 5126
P. 3
Jim O'Gmdy
January 15, 1999
Page Two
chapter in Temecula to work with emerging companies in the high tech
marketplace_' The new website has been launched. It will undergo revisions on
an ongoing basis until we are satisfied that all appropriate information has been
provided. Some linkage to other sites has been instituted and more will be added
as the site is developed. ' '
Business Relations.
The Business Relations Committee held a celebratory meeting in December to
applaud themselves On reaching and surpassing their goals to date. No
visitations were scheduled during December due to the holiday season. The
County of Riverside EDA made several informative presentations during the
meeting. Members leamed about the kiosk program developed by the
Workforce Development Department, job training incentive programs and general
incentives offered by the County for companies relocating or expanding in the
county. Reports were given on eight businesses visited in November in
Temecula. A meeting is scheduled in January to continue planning for the job fair
that will be held in April.
Ad.ministretion/Organization
Staff has continued to assist the Board of DireCtors and Executive Committee in
the strategic planning process, Work has begun on development of an action
plan.
This concludes the wdtten summary of activity for the month of December.
Please call if them are questions concerning this report_
Very t y ~~ '"
~tive Director
V A L L E Y
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM CONCIL
ACTIVITIES REPORT
OCTOBER, NOVEMBER and DECEMBER 1998
COUNCIL
Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Fred Huber, President; Brian Padberg, Vice-President;
Judi Staats, Treasurer: Maggi Allen, Secretary: Sheri Davis: Rod Jones; Tim Miller: Steve Phelps: Dick
Rainey: Penny Rivera; and Sunny' Thomas.
The Temecula Valley International Film Festival was an "Industry" SUCCESS in September.
In October, Sunny Thomas resigned as Executive Director of the Temecula Valley Film Council, due to the
financial hardship of being paid for a part-time job that had required more than full-time hours. This
month' s meeting brought us to the reality, that the Film Festival had been a financial disaster for the Film
Council. Our bank account balance as of October 31, 1998 was $17, 268.99 with many bills and receipts
from the Festival outstanding. The bank balance as of November 30, 1998 is $1437.80 having paid all
known bills for the Festival and with one outstanding receipt from Arden Reality. for $3 500.00(Fred Huber
and Sunny Thomas will follow-up on the monies due the Film Council). At this time we cannot afford an
Executive Director, but we still need to carry. out our business of promoting the Temecula Valley to the
film, television and advertising industries.
The Film Council held a special meeting in November to discuss its direction for 1999. In light of the
extreme personal, physical and financial pressure put upon the Film Council and especially the Executive
Director' s position, the Film Council discussed the possibility of having the Film Festival run by a
professional organization skilled in the funding, marketing and industry of the Film Festival. The
Temecula Valley International Film Festival is now well established as an aunnal event, which brings the
film industry to our valley to enjoy our community, it's many diverse settings, and points of interest. The
latter part of this statement is where the Film Council comes in. Our mission statement directs us to bring
the film, television, and advertising industries and their businesses to the Temecula Valley and this we can
and will do. Our next step is to help the City find an organization able and willing to take on the Temecula
Valley International Film Festival.
Currently as a volunteer organization, without an Executive Director. we are answering the phones by
"personal secretary.", answering and taking messages, and referring them to other commtmity volunteers
when necessaB.-. We have developed a list of location and industry knowledgeable people in the Temecula
Valley area ~vho are willing and able to help us contact the interested production companies with
information about locations and production services available here. Whenever possible, the3' will arrange
with the location scouts or production people to show them what is available and any alternate locations.
Listed below are 3 new filming activities set for 1999.
January 9, 10 & 11 - "Dining Roo~n" a short film
Janua~. 9th is a prep day. Actual shooting days are January 10~ &l 1th For the two days shooting
in Temecula, the production company will be spending about $27,000 (hiring locals, equipment rental,
craftYcatering service, location fees). Local coordination by Jo Moulton & Stacy Sievek.
January 11th -- 19th - Japanese commercial by In-School Productions
Filming will primarily be in Lake Elsinore, but about 40% will be in the Temecula/Murrieta area.
It is mainly a Japanese crew, but location coordination, craft service, additional equipment rental and hiring
of local crew will be coordinated by Jo Moulton & Stacy Sievek. Estimated economic impact on Lake
ElsinorefFemecula/Mumeta is $75,000.
February 1st -10th - "Cousin of Sleep" - a UCLA thesis short film
They will be hiring 10-12 local people. Estimated economic impact to Temecula is $30,000 (local
hires, accommodations, location fees, craft services, car and equipment rentals). Local coordination by Jo
Moulton & Stacy Sievek. "Cousin Sleep" is a direct lead from the 1997 Film Festival.
Thanks to the generosi.ty of Sheri Davis with the Inland Empire Film Commission, the Temecula Valley
Film Council will be participating in the ShowBiz Expose in Los Angeles in February. There will be an
expanded FAM tour in 1999 to include a grand tour of Temecula for producers, directors,
cinematographers. screenwriters. and travel and location magazine editors. Our volunteers will take an
active role in these events,
The Temecula Valley Film Council is planning fund raising and awareness raising events for the coming
year. The TVFC will receive all proceeds from the "Talent Showcase" of the Arts in the Country Festival
in June. A "SHOOT TEMECULA" Photo Contest and E.,dtibition is also planned for later this year, along
with updating our Production Guide and selling new ads.
We will support the daily management of ~lmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of
the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within
the context of filmmaking activities. and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local
merchants and businesses.
Maggi Allen
Secretary.
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~2.-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official "'~
January 26, 1999
Departmental Report
Calendar Year End - 1998
PREPARED BY: Carol Brockmeier, Administrative Secretary
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ..............................................................................2,556
NSFR ...............................................................................................................................714
NCOM ...............................................................................................................................77
TOTAL VALUATION ..................................................................................................$224,125,150
TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS PERFORMED ................................. 27,769
CODE ACTIONS ......................................................................................................................5,940
APPRO~VEN.~E~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
.-~)
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
January 26, 1999
Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department in the month of December, 1998.
Current Planning Activities
New Cases
The Division received 34 new applications for administrative and other minor cases and 7 new
applications for public hearings during the month of December. The new public headng cases are
as follows:
Environmental Impact Report 1
General Plan Amendment 2
Parcel Map 1
Development Plan 2
Specific Plan 1
Pre-applications
No pre-application meeting were held in December.
Status of Fast Track Projects
The City's award-winning Fast Track process provides a way for major businesses relocating to or
expanding in Temecula to get their facilities constructed and occupied in the shortest possible time.
The current Fasttrack projects are as follows:
Bostik - is currently under construction in the Westside Business Centre.
Moving and Storage company relocation on Zevo Drive. - The relocation of an
existing business to a new 14,600 square foot building. This project was approved
by the Planning Commission public hearing in December, 1998.
C & H Office Specialties - The relocation of a 50,000 square foot furniture
manufacturer from the Ontario area to the Westside Business Centre. This project
was approved by the Planning Commission public hearing in January, 1999.
R:WIONTHLY.RPT\I 998~new december.doc
1
Status of Major Projects
Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and get the following cases
ready for public hearing before the Community Development Director or Planning Commission:
A 22,000 square foot Senior Care and Alzheimer Care Facility located at the south
east comer of Margadta and Pauba Roads in the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Staff
is waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staff's DRC comments.
Rebel Rents new facility on Winchester Road in the Westside Business Center. Staff
is waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staffs DRC comments.
A new 11,300 square foot speculative commercial building on Enterprise Circle
South. Staff is waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staff's DRC
comments.
-,
The expansion of the Temecula Creek Inn. The current proposal consists of 28
additional rooms and doubling the size of their meeting and event spaces. Staff is
waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant based upon staff's DRC comments.
Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue. This project may require
a focused environmental impact report to enable the City to effectively deal with the
potential impacts associated with this project.
Tentative Tract Map 28510 for 242 residential units and an amendment to the
General Plan Land Use Map, the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, with an Addendum
EIR are being finalized for a future public hearing.
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Highway Tourist to Community
Commercial for the northeast corner of Butterfield Stage Road and SR-79 South
(Corona Ranch).
Tentative Parcel Map 28627, the Margarita Canyon Property. Staff is waiting for a
resubmittal from the applicant based upon staff's comments on the applicanrs most
recent proposal.
Wolf Valley Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: The applicant is currently
working on the draft environmental impact report. A preliminary draft of the Specific
Plan and EIR has been submitted for staff review. Staff is in the process of
generating a comment letter to the applicant based upon their review of these
documents.
A 28-1ot tract map on Via La Vida east of Calle Palmas, Tentative Tract Map 29036.
Staff is assembling the DRC comments for distribution to the applicant.
The expansion of Milgard into a new 108,000 square foot building in the Westside
Business Center. Staff is still working with the applicant on issues raised a the DRC
meeting. (This project represents the retention (and expansion) of business that is
currently operating in the City.)
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Staff has provided
their initial comments and is waiting for the formal submittal from the applicant.
R:'~M O NT H LY. R PT\1998~new december. doc
2
Small Business Assistance
The Planning Division continues to meet with small business people on an ongoing basis to facilitate
their successful relocation and expansion in Temecula. Some of our recent activities include the
following:
Stout Funeral Home: Analysis of on-site sign program:
Chocolate Florist: Aided Old Town business in completing driveway and parking lot
improvements.
Super Trap Bullet Containment Systems: Advised business on expansion of uses on property.
HomeLife Realty: Helped client evaluate the possibilities of establishing a new glass shop in the
Old Town area.
Special Event Permits
Special events and temporary use permits enable short commercial events and communitywide
activities to occur with the City. The Division's role is to facilitate inter-departmental review and
provide support to the applicants. Some of the recently permitted activities are as follows:
Approval of a car wash and detail facility for Norm Reeves Super Group.
A customer awareness lunch for Guidant Corporation.
Regular planning meetings with the Temecula Town Association for the 1999 Temecula Rod Run
(February 12-14) in Old Town Temecula.
R:WIONTHLY. RPT\1998~new december.doc
3
Special Projects & Lon.q Range Planning Activities
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
*r
Old Town In Lieu Parking Program: Staff revised the eadier proposal and presented
it for Council's consideration in December.
Convention Center Study: Work on the project in underway, Phase I of the study is
expected in December.
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The
consultant is currently gathering information to begin preparation of the Draft EIR.
Southside Specific Plan: Staff and consultant are beginning the process of revisiting
the draft Specific Plan.
Massage Business Ordinance: A revised draft of the ordinance is being reviewed by
the City Attorney.
-k
Adult Business Ordinance: Since the Council's adoption of the new Ordinance, staff
has been working out the details for processing these applications to ensure that all
constitutional and legal issues are addressed
General Plan Circulation Element Update: The Steering Committee (including
representatives from the City of Murdeta and the Pechanga Reservation continue to
meet. The current focus of the process is finalizing the proposed Circulation Plan
and Element Text. Introductory presentations to the Traffic Safety and Planning
Commissions will occur on January 14th and January 20th. Staff has started the
process of drafting an improvement and phasing plan that will be used to support the
City's capital improvement program process.
Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is finalizing and awaiting any comments from the
Coordinating Committee on draft ordinance.
-k
Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation Study: Staff has been working with County staff to
try to resolve the outstanding issues.
Surface Mining Ordinance: Staff is finalizing a Surface Mining Ordinance to address
any future surface mining operations.
-k
Geographic Information System (GIS): Staff is working on the final GIS versions of
colored Zoning and General Plan Land Use maps.
R:WIONTHLY.RPT\1998%new december.doc
4