Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout111594 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD NOVEMBER 15, 1994- 7:00 PM In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35. 102.35. I04ADA Title II] At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM, Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-32 Resolution: No. 94-104 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor non Roberts presiding Invocation: Pastor Joe Rider, Rancho Baptist Church Flag Salute: Councilmember Stone ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS Bicycle Safety Poster Contest Winners Proclamation - "1994 California Family Week" Proclamation - "Great American Smokeout Day" A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and flied with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 3 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 11, 1994. Resolution ADorovino List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 5 6 7 City Treasurer's Report as of Seotember 30, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1994. Review of City Conflict of Interest Code RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Review amendments to the City's Conflict of Interest Code. 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE 5.3 Direct the City Clerk to file the amended Conflict of Interest Code with the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). Substitute Subdivision Imorovement AQreement and Public Improvement Bonds in TraCt 21067 (Located at the northeast corner of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road) (Continued from the meeting of 10/18/94) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 21067. 6.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Contract Amendment No. 8 to Community Facilities District 88-12 EnQineerino Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchanc~e Modifications (Continued from the meeting of 10/18/94) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 8 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modification in an amount not to exceed $107,000.00. 9 10 11 Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) OODositi0n Form RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign the enclosed Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) Opposition Form. 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO STOP THE $50 BILLION DOLLAR FIP BEFORE IT STOPS CALIFORNIA General Liability Insurance Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the renewal of the City's Municipal General, Automobile, and Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West, the annual premium amount is $98,633, and Automobile Physical Damage, at a premium of $5,869. Completion and Acceotance of the Pre-cast T-sections Portion of the Liefer Road Bridae and Street Imorovements. Project No. PW93-02 RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Accept the pre-cast bridge T-sections portion of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02, as complete. 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. Solicitation of Bids for the Acauisition of Riaht-Of-Wav Weed Control ADDlications Contract (Project No. PW94-20) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for the annual right-- of-way weed control contract (Project No. PW94-20). 12 Fundino Aoreement for Murrieta Creek Botanical Assessment Consultant Services 13 14 15 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the agreement between the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, (DISTRICT), Kernper Community Development Company, (DEVELOPER), and the City of Temecula, (CITY), providing for the financing of Botanical Assessment Consulting (CONSULTANT) services required as a condition of the issuance of an Emergency Permit by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers following the January 1993 flooding. 12.2 Appropriate eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00)for a deposit as the estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on the reach of the Murrieta Creek Channel not owned by either DEVELOPER or DISTRICT. Substitute Subdivision Imorovement AQreement and Public Imorovement Bonds in Tract No. 23125-1 (Located at the northeast corner of Butterfield Stage Road at DePortola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 23125-1; 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Final Vestina Tract MaD NO. 24133 (Located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133 subject to the Conditions of Approval. Final Vestina Tract MaD No. 23125-2 (Located east of Butterfield Stage Road and north of De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2 subject to the Conditions of Approval. 16 Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Maroarita Road from Winchester Road to Northerly Citv Limits) 17 18 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 161 INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (MARGARITA ROAD FROM WINCHESTER ROAD TO THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMITS) Final Parcel MaD 25212 (Located at the Northeast corner of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Liefer Road) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Rescind their approval of Final Parcel Map No. 25212 and release the associated Street and Water Improvement bonds. Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Sional & Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation, Project N0. PW94-05 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Award a contract for the construction of the Traffic Signal and Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation, Project No. PW94-05 to Paul Gardner Corporation for $26,477.00and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 18.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,647.70 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 19 Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW94-14. FY94-95 Citywide A.C. Repair Proqram RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Award a contract for Project No. PW94-14, FY94-95 Citywide A.C. Repair Program, to A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $87,401.76. 19.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,740.17 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 2O 21 22 23 Award of Construction Contract for Project NO. PW94-17, FY94-95 Street StriDino Prooram RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Award a contract for Project No. PW94-17, FY94-95 Street Striping Program to I.P.S. Services, Inc. responsible bidder, in the amount of $83,700. 20.2 Authorize a budget transfer in the amount of $48,700 from Account No. 100-164- 601-5402to Account No. 100-164-601-5410. Supplement No. 002 to Local Aoencv - State Aareement for Federal Aid Project NO. 08- 6052, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. 08-6052, I-15/I-215 CORRIDOR STUDY Educational Radar Trailer DisDlav Unit RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Approve the purchase of an Educational Radar Trailer Display Unit in the amount of $10,400. Lot Line Adjustment and Easements for Rancho California Water District (R.C.W.D.) Well Site No. 216- Rancho California SPorts Park RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Approve Lot Line Adjustment No. PA93-147 and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. 23.2 Approve the Corporation Grant Deeds exchanging property between the City and R.C.W.D. and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. 23.3 Approve the Grant of Easement to R.C.W.D. for Permanent Access and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. 23.4 Approve the Grant of Easement to R.C.W.D. for Drainage proposes only and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. 24 Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-03CSD. Rancho California Water District (R.C.W.D.) - Water Meter Fees 25 RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Approve and authorize the payment of water meter fees in the amount of ;13,972.00to R.C.W.D. Consideration of a Contract Amendment for Weed Abatement Services RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Approve a contract amendment extending an agreement for professional services for weed abatement with Gre¢l Smith, Smith Tractor Services, to December 31, 1994. The total amount of t~' s agreement not to exceed twenty-four thousand (;24,000) dollars. 26 27 Contract for Professional Services with C.M. Gilliss, Consultant RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement with C.M. "Max" Gilliss to act as a liaison between the City and governmental agencies and special interest groups for a monthly fee of $3,000.00. 26.2 Appropriate $12,000 in the City Manager's Department consulting line item from the General Fund - Fund Balance. Summary Vacation of an existino forty (40) foot access oDenine frontine On Ynez Road between Solana way and Rancho California Road on Parcel 2 of Parcel MaD No. 23496 and Acceptance of new access oDenine RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXITING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS FOR PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 23496 LOCATED ON YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD 27.2 Approve the new location of the access opening in substantially the location described as "Opening No. 1" as described on the attachments to this Staff Report and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access opening. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. 28 Summary Vacation of an existino forty (40) foot access oDenine frondno on Jefferson Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and Bueckino Drive on Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel mad NO. 23561-2 and Acceptance of new access oDenines RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXISTING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS FOR PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP 23561 - 2 LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN SANBORN AVENUE AND BUECKING DRIVE 28.2 Approve the new locations of the access openings in substantially the locations described as "Opening No. 1" and Opening No. 2" as described on the attachments to this Staff Report and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access openings. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 29 Plannine Aoolication No. PA94-0063 (ADDeal) - a Forty-One Foot, Six Inch Hioh (41 '6"), One Hundred Twenty-Two (122) Souare Foot Freestandino Freeway Oriented Sion for Toyota of Temecula Valley located on the East Side of Interstate 15 (Continued from the meeting of October 11, 1994) RECOMMENDATION: 29.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063 (APPEAL), UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-ONE FOOT, SIX INCH HIGH (41 '6"), ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO (122) SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING FREEWAY ORIENTED SIGN FOR TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALLEY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15 AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-005 30 DisaDoroval of Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated EeuiDment of Inland Vallev Cablevision. and Orderina a Refund for Excessive Rates (Continued from the meeting of October 11, 1994) RECOMMENDATION: 30.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DISAPPROVING THE CABLE TELEVISION RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OF INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION, AND ORDERING A REFUND FOR EXCESSIVE RATES 31 Nondisposal Facility Element RECOMMENDATION: 31.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1999 COUNCIL BUSINESS 32 33 34 35 Property Insurance CoveraQe (Continued from the meeting of 9/13/94) RECOMMENDATION: 32.1 Provide direction to staff in accordance with one of the following options: · Submit notice to Strachota and Aetna that the City is terminating the policy, effective November 30, 1994 and direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through Driver/PEPIP, effective December 1, 1994. · Terminate the Aetna policy in conjunction with its expiration on February 26, 1995. In the interim, revise the policy provisions in accordance with the proposal submitted by Strachota. Direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through Driver/PEPIP, after expiration of the current Aetna policy. Consideration of Soonsorshio Requests RECOMMENDATION: 33.1 Consider the sponsorship requests for the Rod Run Association, Balloon and Wine Association, and the Tractor Race Committee of the Temecula Town Association (TTA). Rorioaueh Ranch Density Consideration (Requested by Councilmember Parks) RECOMMENDATION: 34.1 Review and provide direction to staff. Main Street Proqram RECOMMENDATION: 35.1 Provide direction to Staff on: · The needed amendments to the existing Bylaws; · The future organization of Main Street Association; · The use of alternate funding sources for the Main Street Program; · The draft Cooperative Agreement between the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association and the City of Temecula. 36 37 38 Auto Mall Marauee Fundina RECOMMENDATION: 36.1 Reconsider a loan to the Auto Dealers Association of Temecula to erect an auto mall marquee and provide staff direction concerning possible site relocation and design revisions. Community Services Fundino Ad Hoc Subcommittee RECOMMENDATION: 37.1 Appoint two Council members to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee to review applications for Community Services Funding. Public\Traffic Safety Commission Goals and Obiectives RECOMMENDATION: 38.1 Direct staff to prepare a resolution defining the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Goals and Objectives. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: November 29, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING * (Tobe held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1,1 Approve the minutes of October 11, 1994. 2 Community Services Recreation Brochure RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept proposal of $15,039from Graphic Unlimited to print one (1) issue of the Community Services Recreation Brochure. 3 Acceotance of Aareement and Bonds - Kaufman and Broad of San Dieao, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Accept the agreement and surety bonds provided by the developer to improve the perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 23125-1 - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 RanCho California Sports Park Imorovement Proiect Desion Considerations RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Direct staff to bid the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project as designed in accordance with the approved master plan and bid the skateboard facility as an add alternate bid. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting November 29, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ' TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY:MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR MinUtes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 11, 1994. 2 Authorization of Aareement for Professional Consultine Services for Transportation and Traffic Enaineerina for T.Z.B.G., Inc. Proiect, Old Town Parkincl Study, RFP #30 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. for a parking study in the amount of $20,420. Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Council as to final form. AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan (Temecula Shuttle) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Consider approval of an RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to Edward and Kathleen Dool DBA Dual Development Inc. 4 AcQuisition of Low and Moderate Income Housina Site RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the purchase of a site located at the southwest corner of Diaz Road and Cherry Avenue for the purpose of providing low and moderate income housing within a five to ten year period. 4.2 Appropriate $3,744,368 in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (165). EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: November 29, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WltF. REAS, the family has been the vehicle of survival and stability in every culture from ancient Egypt to present-day America, and Wlff!~,REAS, individuals first find identity within the family circle, realize their relationship to others and to a Supreme Being, and discover there exists moral absolutes such as truth and honesty, right and wrong; and WIItF,,REAS, the family group is the first unit of government, the primary place where individuals learn rules of conduct and infractions for disobedience; where respect, honor and wholesome standards of behavior are practiced, and where individuals learn to interact, communicate, acquire social skills and form and express personal views; and WHI~,REAS, to focus on family, give thanks for its existence and encourage wholesome family life, it has become traditional for the President and Congress of the United States to proclaim the week in which Thanksgiving Day falls as "National Family Week"; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald It. Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of November 20-26, 1994 to be "1994 California Family Week" in the City of Temecula, and encourage the celebration of this week through family reunions and by establishing stronger family ties, reinforcing and instituting family traditions, feasting, worshipping together and with other appropriate activities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affvced this 15th day of November, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WItEREAS, The American Cancer Society 's Great American Smokeout is a light~hearted effort to encourage smokers to give up their habit for 24 hours on Thursday, November 17th; and WIclEREAS, for eighteen consecutive years, millions of smokers, including many in the City of Temecula have participated in this event; and WHEREAS, the health benefits of not smoking are substantiated and well known; and W!tEREAS, there are additional civic benefits, such as reduction of the risks of accidental fires and illnesses related to secondhand smoke; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of November 17, 1994 to be "GREAT AMERICAN SMOKEOUT DAY" and in doing so, encourage all smokers and smokeless tobacco users in the community to demonstrate to themselves and their friends that they can quit if they wish by joining the American Cancer Society's 18th Annual Great American Smokeout. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 15th day of November, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD OCTOBER 11, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:42 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9, Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Old Vail Partners, Hill, Rancho Regional Center and Dawes vs City of Temecula) and the Claim of Harrison, Nichols vs. the city of Temecula, et. al. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. Councilmember Mu~oz arrived at 6:05 PM. The meeting was reconvened in regular session at 7:02 PM. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ken Coil, Neighborhood Church of the Nazarene. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Mu~oz. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Roberts proclaimed October 14, 15 and 16, 1994, to be "The Help Retarded Children Weekend". Mr. George Rooney, representing Knights of Columbus, thanked the City for their proclamation and invited the public to participate in the "Tootsie Roll Drive" to benefit retarded children in the community. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. Minutes~l 0\11 ~94 - 1 - 10125194 City Council Minutes October 11, 1994 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Birdsall thanked all those who participated with the Tractor Race. Mayor Pro Tern Stone stated he attended the Concert on the Green and is in support of more events such as this. Councilmember Parks reported he artended a SCAG meeting and the regional plan is moving forward with four elements approved at the last meeting. He also asked that the traffic light timing on Winchester Road be examined. Mayor Roberrs announced that the October 3, 1994 Candidates Forum scheduled to be aired on Cable TV last Saturday had technical problems and will air Friday, October 14th on Channel 28 at 6:00 PM. Mayor Roberts presented the Council with gifts from Mayor Einhorn of Voorburg, Holland, Temecula's first Sister City, and from Carcassone, France, which is also being considered as a Sister City with Temecula. Mayor Roberrs expressed condolences to the families of Autumn Harkey and Sam Couch on behalf of the City Council. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Roberts announced that a request had been made to continue Items No. 11 and 13. Councilmember Parks abstained on Items Nos. 10 and 13. Councilmember Birdsall abstained on Item No. 5. Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained on Item No. 6. Councilmember Mu~oz abstained on Item No. 12 and requested the removal of Items 4, 6 and 9 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Parks requested the removal of Item No. 12 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13-16, with Items 11 and 13 being continued. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts None None Minutes\10\l 1\94 -2- IO/25/94 City Council Minutes October 11.1994 2 Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. MinUte~ 2.1 Approve the minutes of September 13, 1994. 2.2 Approve the minutes of September 27, 1994. 3 5 Resolution AoDrovine List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Reiect the Bid for the Pala Road at Hwv 79S, Riaht Turn Lane Project (No. PW94-08) - 5.1 Reject the bid and direct staff to re-bid the Pala Road at Hwy 79S, Right Turn Lane Project (PW94-08). The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Interim Director of Public Works Contract 7.1 Approve a contract with Kicak and Associates to provide Interim City Engineer/Director of Public Works services. Parks, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberts None None Birdsall Minutes\ 10% 11 \94 -3- 10/25/94 City Council Minutes 8. 10. October 11, 1994 Records Destruction Approval 8.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Authorize Reduction in Faithful Performance Bond Amounts in Tract No. 25004-1 - (Property Located East of Seraphina Road, North of Nicolas Road) 10.3 The motion was carried by the following vote: 10.1 Authorize a fifty (50) percent reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Water and Sewer improvement Bond amounts; 10.2 Accept the Faithful Performance Improvement Bond Rider in the reduced amount in Tract No. 25004-1; Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks 11 13 Substitute Subdivision Improvement AGreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract 21067 (Property Located South of Highway 79-S and Northeast of Pala Road) 11.1 Continue to the meeting of October 18, 1994. Walcott Corridor Improvements, Project No. PW94-10, Rancho California Water District FundinG Reauest 13.1 Continue to the meeting of October 18, 1994. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberrs NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks Minutes~10\11\94 -4- 10/25/94 City Council Minutes October 11. 1994 14 Aeproval of Contract Services Aoreements 14.1 Approve contract service agreements for Esgil Corporation, Vandorpe Chou Associates, Ray Grage and Associates and Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, to provide building plan check services to the Building and Safety Department. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 15 Second Readino of Ordinance 94-25 15.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-25 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MODIFYING SECTION G(1 .) OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 475.73 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN ORDINANCE NO. 90-04. TO CHANGE THE HOURS AND DAYS DURING WHICH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS ALLOWED 16 Second Readino of Ordinance No. 94-28 16.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 10.36 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE REGULATION OF NEWSRACKS IN PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY Public Nuisance Abatement - 30301 Nicolas Road Councilmember Mu~oz asked if a public hearing would be held on this issue after the abatement occurs. City Attorney Thorson explained that code requires a public hearing be held to determine what percentage of associated costs will be assessed and to give the property owner the opportunity to object, Councilmember Parks asked if the property owner has been contacted. Chief Building Official Tony Elmo responded that this property has seven owners and they have been made aware of the process. Minutes\10~11 \94 -5- 10125194 City Council Minutes October 11, 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $58,600 to Environmental Control Systems, Inc. for the removal of all trash, debris, building foundations and for the securing of all buildings. 4.2 Approve an appropriation of $58,600 for Account No. 001-162-999-5250, Other Outside Services, from Unreserved Fund Balance. The motion was unanimously carried. Reauest to Caltrans for Freeway Guide Sions Identifvino the Old Town Business District Councilmember Mu~oz reported he spoke with Peter Chan at Caltrans and with the support of the Council, is hopeful this project will become a reality. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE INSTALLATION OF FREEWAY GUIDE SIGNS IDENTIFYING THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA BUSINESS DISTRICT The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Vehicle Purchase for Fire Insoector Councilmember Mu~oz asked why an additional City Vehicle is needed. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney explained this vehicle will be used by the Fire Inspector who previously used a County Vehicle. Ms. McLarney stated the County allowed the City to use this vehicle for the past six months, but now has allocated to another area. Minutes\ 10\ 11 \94 -6- 10/25/94 Council Minutes 12. October 11, 1994 Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the new vehicle can be converted to propane. Finance Officer McLarney responded this vehicle can be converted. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, Seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to approve staff recommendation, with the additional direction that the vehicle be retrofitted for use of propane as an alternate fuel. The motion was unanimously carried. Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Winchester Road Interim Street improvements (Proiect NO. PW94-03) Councilmember Parks asked that a staff report be given on this matter. Principal Engineer Don Spagnolo presented an overview of the project. Councilmember Birdsall asked if the engineer's estimate is for night or day work. Mr. Spagnolo responded this is the day estimate. Councilmember Parks asked that the bidding process be expedited. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro ~7em Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 12.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW94-03, Winchester Road interim Street Improvements. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz Mayor Roberts announced Item No. 20 will be continued to the meeting of November 15, 1994. 17. SPecific Plan NO. 263 (ReGional Center) and Chan~le of Zone No. 5589 Councilmember Mu~oz stepped down from the dias due to a conflict of interest. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Minutes\l 0~11 \94 -7- 1 O/25194 Ci~' Council Minutes October 11, 1994 Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he has heard the sewage plant is nearing capacity and asked what provisions have been made if this occurs. Director of Planning Thornh~. stated it is his understanding that EMWD is planning expansion of their facilities. Councilmember Parks said he understandings that the Overland Bridge will be funded through second phase CFD 88-12 Bond sales when 750,O00square feet of occupancy reached. He asked what happens if the property is sold. Mr. Thornhill explained that conditions stay with the property. Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 8:00 PM. Dennis Chiniaeff, 27555 Ynez Road, No. 202, spoke in favor of the project. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 8:03 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 8:04 PM. Philip Hoxsey, 43318 Cielo De Azul, spoke in opposition to the project based on possible usages. He also stated he feels the developer should be required to build Overland Overcrossing prior to development. Mayor Roberrs closed the public hearing at 8:08 PM. Councilmember Birdsall expressed her support of the project and stated that Kernper should not be expected to carry the entire burden of the Overland Crossing. Mayor Pro Tem Stone expressed his support of the project and stated this area deserves a regional mall and that he would be actively recruiting this type of development. Councilmember Parks said he feels staff and the developer have worked hard to work out a quality plan. He stated he would be willing to work with a committee and achieve buy-in from all the property owners, to speed construction of the Overland Overcrossing. Minutes\ 1 O\11 \94 -8- 10/25/94 City Council Minutes October 11.1994 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 17.1 as follows: 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO FEIR NO. 340; TO ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO FEIR NO. 340 INCLUDING A NEW MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND DETERMINING NO ADDITIONAL IMPACTS AS A RESULT OF CHANGING THE CIRCULATION MITIGATION MEASURES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 17.2 as follows: 17.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCENO. 94-29 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5589, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) AND A-2-20 (HEAVY AGRICULTURE, 20 ACRE MINIMUM) TO SP {SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 17.3 as follows: 17.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCENO. 94-30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (REGIONAL CENTER) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD Minutes\lO\l 1%94 -9- 10/25/94 City Council Minutes October 11, 1994 The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 17.4 as follows: 17.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 2634 PROPOSING A 1,375,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CORE, 810,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE-INSTITUTIONAL WITH POSSIBLE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND AN ADDITIONAL 298,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNE7 AND WINCHESTER ROADS The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 8:15 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:45 PM. 18. Plannine Aoplication No. PA94-0063(ApOeal)- a Forty-One Foot. Six Inch HiQh (41 '6"), One Hundred Twenty-Two (122 SQuare Foot FreestandinQ Freeway Oriented SiQn for Toyota of Temecula Valley located on the East Side of interstate 15 Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tern Stone asked, with respect to Ordinance 348, whether this application could be granted. Mr. Thornhill responded this application could not be granted without a variance or a change to the Municipal Code. He explained the applicant has the option to place a sign either in the front or back of his property. Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked the status of the Auto Mall Marquee. Planning Director Thornhill stated the Marquee was approved for a two year period of time, however no application has been filed. CounciLmember Birdsall stated she favors the concept of an auto mall marquee over individual signs. Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 10:35 PM. Minute;\ 10\ 11 \94 - 1 O- 10~25~94 City Council Minutes October 11, 1994 John H. Marsden, 1225 E. Johnstone Ave, Hemet, spoke in favor of allowing the Forty-one foot, six inch high sign for Toyota of Temecula. He explained a thirty foot sign would not be visible from the freeway. He also stated a flag-test had not been required for this site. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to extend the meeting until 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Dan Atwood, 26631 Ynez Road, spoke in favor of the appeal, stating his need for more visibility from the freeway. He also stated that the auto dealers are not planning to proceed with the Auto Mall Marquee. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a brief recess at 10:25 PM to change the tape. reconvened at 10:26 PM with all members present. 19. The meeting was Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated staff direction is needed to know if individual signs will be allowed and or if there is still interest in an Auto Mall Marquee. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muffoz to continue the public hearing to the meeting of November 15, 1994 to allow staff time to pursue the viability of establishing a marquee sign to serve all the auto dealers in the auto mall. The motion was unanimously carried. Planning Aoolication No. 94-0017 Development AGreement for Tract 27827 Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. City Attorney Thorson reported that "Exhibit A" has been revised to list development approvals that have been given. Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 11:00 PM. Dale Gleed, representing Coscan Davidson, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200, Del Mar, stated he prefers the version without the amendment, but is willing to accept the amendment. Mayor Roberrs closed the public hearing at 11:02 PM. Minutes\ 1 O\11 \94 - 11 - 10/25/94 Cit~ Council Minutes October 11, 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 19.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA 94-0017. 19.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-31 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND COSCAN HOMES CALIFORNIA, INC,, DBA COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES, FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164- RORIPAUGH, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94- 0017 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz 20. RECESS DisaDoroval of Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated EauiDment of Inland Valley Cablevision. and Orderina a Refund for Excessive Rates Mayor Roberrs oDened the public hearing at 11:03 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to continue the public hearing to the meeting of November 15, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Roberts called a recess at 11:03 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 11:08 PM, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. Minutes\ 10~ 11 \94 - 12- 10125/94 City Council Minutes October 11.1994 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to extend the meeting until 11:30 PM. 21. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: RorioauQh Ranch Specific Plan Density Parks, Stone, Roberts Birdsall Mu~oz Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks stated he met with Roripaugh homeowners and the density change would only address Roripaugh Ranch and does not apply to all areas of the specific plan. Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the applicant thought he was receiving three gross units per acre. He stated he was advised by the City Attorney that a General Plan Amendment would be necessary to facilitate such a change. Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he would not be in favor of granting this exception. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Mayor Roberrs to retain the density at three dwelling units per net acre. The motion failed by the following vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Roberts NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue the item to the meeting of November 15, 1994. The motion failed by the following vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Roberts NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz No action was taken as a result of a 2-2 tie vote. Minutes\ 1 O\ 11 ~94 - 13- 10/25/94 City Council Minutes October 11.1994 22. Award a Professional Services Contract to NBS Lowry to Preoare the Nicolas Valley Soecial Study It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 22.1 Award a Professional Services contract to NBS Lowry in the amount of $24,673 to prepare the Nicolas Valley Special Study and authorize the Mayor to execute said contract. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. 23. Proposed Keeo Temecula Clean "Ado0t-A-Street" Acknowledaement Sign Size Interim Director of Public Works Joe Kicak presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation for a 24 x 24 inch sign. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mufloz absent. 24. Community Services Commission Aooointments It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to re- appoint Rich Saltysiak and Jeff Nimeshein to serve three (3) year terms. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. 25. Public\Traffic Safety Commission Aooointments 26. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to re- appoint Ron Guerriero to serve a three (3) year term. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. Reouest from Suoervisor Bob Buster for Determination of City of TemeCula's Interest in Pre-Fundina Assessment District 161 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue this item, with direction to staff to return with a report outlining the amount of funding required, the length of time projected to complete the project, the amount of interest on the loan to AD-161 and if the County is willing to provide guarantees that the reimbursement to the City will occur. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. Minutes\lO\l 1\94 -14- 10125/94 City Council Minutes 27. October 11, 1994 Desion Services Contract - Parkview Fire Station Project It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 27.1 Award contract of $174,313 to RJM Design Group for the preparation of the master plan, schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration for the Parkview Fire Station Project. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 11:31 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz absent. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes\l 0\11 ~94 - 15- 10/25/94 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RF-qOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXIIIR1T A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $I,195,643.16. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 15th day of November, 1994. ATFEST: RonRoberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Re~s42 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- .was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 15th day of November, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S, Greek, City Clerk Rcsos42 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 10/13/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/20/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/27/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/03/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/15/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/20/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: 11/03/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/15/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA~LOW/MOD 19O COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) '50 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 80 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES 39O TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE 320 iNFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: ONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 41,513.72 81,888,40 93,326,18 134,797,76 614,727.87 114,386.30 $ 1,195,843,16 460,538.26 49,453.78 5,328.38 106,721.14 7,226,88 508.53 30,582.32 232,646.73 7,869.88 16,771.02 5,466.18 16,480,20 8,775.52 17,420.11 465.00 $ 966,253.93 143,072.95 29,067.13 1,161.80 40,503.54 926.73 616.31 3,612.90 960,94 1,192,10 2,857.43 1,447.21 3,970.19 229,389.23 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT, V~UCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECIJLA 6 10/13/94 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZCX3S FUND TZTLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LC/~/NO0 SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C[P INSURANCE FUND 320 [NFORHATION SYSTENS SUPPORT SERVZCES 340 FACZLITIES ANOUNT 12,314.78 6,431.0/. 48.90 15,916.55 439,09 4.40 2,114.58 5.82 77.48 112.58 2,092.10 1,225.13 731.27 TOTAL 41,513.72 CITY OF TENEC~JLA PAGE 1 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCI3UNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER RARE DESCRIPTION NtIqBER 2054/, 10/13/94 001635 A & H COSTUllE RENTAL HALLOMEEN SUPPLIES 190-183~~-5370 205A5 10/13/94 000724 A & R CUSTI)I SCREEN PRI SPTS AMARDS(HOODED SUEATS) 190-183~~-5380 205~6 10/13/94 001631 A C C R A SUSSCRIPTXON-CON4 PROFILES 320-199-999o5221 205~7 10/13/94 000(}80 A M S 20547 10/13/94 O00&80 A N S 20547 10/13194 000680 A R S 20547 10/13/94 000680 A N S 20547 10/13/94 000680 A M S 20547 10/13/94 000680 A M S 20547 10/13/94 000~80 A M S 20547 10/13/94 000~80 A N S 20547 10/13/94 000680 A N S T N s POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-110-999-5230 T N S PORTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-120~999-5230 T N S PORTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-162-999-52~0 T N S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-140-999-5230 T N S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 0116O1 190-180-999-52~0 T M S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-150~999-5230 T M S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 001-161-999-52~0 T M S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 100-164~604-52~0 T N S POSTAGE - ACCOUNT 011601 320-199~999-5230 20548 10/13/94 000931 AROUND A SUCK SUPPLIES FOR HAUNTED HOUSE 190-183-999-5370 20549 10/13/94 000781 ASSOC OF ENV%RONNENTAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR O. UBNOSKE 001-161-999-5226 20r*^ 10/13/94 000129 CAL NEST RENTAL CENTER PARK MAINT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 190-180-999-5238 ,~, 10/13/94 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS SMI FEE PAYMENT 001-2290 20551 10/13/94 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS EMI FEE PAYMENT 00t-2280 20551 10/13/94 000638 CALIFORNIA OEPT OF CONS EMI FEES 001-162-4229 20552 10/13/94 000131 CARL MARREN & CO.# INC. KEMP'COLE, GER1 12/28/93 300-199'999-5205 20553 10/13/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 6V BATTERIES FOR BARRICADES 20553 10/13/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER TAX 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 20554 10/13/94 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC SECURITY & FIRE MONITOR AT CRC 190-182-999-5250 20555 10/13/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO VEHICLE HAINT. PUBLIC ~ORKS 001-163-999-5214 20555 10/13/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO ~EHICLE MAINT. PUBLIC ~/C)RKS 001-165-999-5214 20556 10/13/94 000966 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK DOG FOOO FOR POLICE DOG 001-170-999-5327 20557 10/13/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS SERVICE 001-110-999-5230 20557 10/13/9~ 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS SERVICE 001-162-999-5230 20558 10/13/94 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO POLICY FOR SR CENTER PARK LOT 190-180-999-5250 ITER AMOUNT 100.00 563.84 200. O0 60.94 189.67 80.77 405.96 130.86 80.67 335,99 1.56 75.00 80.00 29.09 2,539.90 830.38 168.51 - 102.13 877.50 68.01 53.00 149.10 81.75 80.78 9.50 86,65 423,00 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 563.84 200.00 1,650.20 75.00 80.00 29.09 3,201.77 102.13 945.51 53.00 230.85 80.78 96.15 42~.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA r 2 10/13/94 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20559 20560 20560 20561 20562 20562 20562 20563 20563 20563 20563 20563 20563 20563 20564 2056/. 20564 20565 20565 2056~ 20567 20574 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 000643 FORTHER HARDWARE 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. 000993 FREEDOR COFFEE, INC. 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA -PAYN 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA -PAYN 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PATH 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRCX)UCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017'7 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT ITEM DESCRIPTION MISC SUPPLIES AND EQUIP COFFEE SUPPLIES COFFEE SUPPLIES E054030999-94271 909 694-6400 GEM 909 695-3539 GEM 909 699-2309 GEM MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR THE CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CSO ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CSU ADMIN. OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO KEYBOARD 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO FREIGHT 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 000186 HANKS HARDWARE HARVEY, MONA HOUSTON & HARRIS PIPE C KIDS PARTIES, ETC. KIDS PARTIES, ETC. 001119 000205 000205 000209 001554 001554 001554 000214 001256 000219 000219 000219 L & M FERTILIZER~ INC. LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC. LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC. LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC. LUNCH & STUFF CATERING MARRIOTT HOTEL HARTIN 1*HOUR PHOTO HARTIN l-HOUR PHOTO HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO MC CLELLAN, LOiS SUPPLIES AND EQUIP. PRK MA[NT RECREATION SUPPLIES REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS EMERG. CLEANING STORM DRAIN MASKS FOR HALLOWEEN SPECIAL GUEST FOR TINY TOTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ROLL AMAY BIN (STORAGE) 39-Q75 FREIGHT TAX CITY COUNCIL MEETING APA CONFERENCE G. THORNHILL PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR TRAFFIC D PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR HAINT. PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR LAND REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5~0 340-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-140-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 190-182-99q-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5301 190-183-4982 100-164-601-5401 190-183-999-5370 190-18~-9~9-5320 100-164-601-5218 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 001-100-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 100-164-602-5250 100-164-601-5250 001-163-999-5250 190-183-4982 ITEM AMOUNT 163.90 144.68 2.96 350.00 587.84 25.27 21.12 80.49 19.29 112.60 16.03 8.00- 1.12- 18.62- 225.00 5.00 17.44 158.44 25.8] 20.00 945.00 113.49 150.00 105.29 6?3.50 37.37 52.20 80.00 108.29 8.46 20.94 24.74 55.00 CHECK AMOUNT .163.90 147.64 350.00 200.67 184.27 20.00 945.00 263.49 105.29 763.07 80.00 108.29 54.14 55.00 20575 10/13/94 001526 HICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 43.99 20575 10/13/94 001526 HICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301 59.29 j.28 VO' CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 10, 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR XTEN ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20576 10/13/94 000~//~3NTELEORE EXCAVATING WATER TRUCK FOR LANDSCAPING 100-164-601-5401 975.00 975. OQ 20577 lo/13/94 001150 O~BRIEN, CN~Y RELOOATE FENCE AT CITY YARD 100-164-601-521E 7BO. O0 7BO.O0 20578 10/13/94 0002~90LSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 9/18-9/25/94 001-162-999-5118 918.45 918.45 20579 10/13/94 001619 ~NGE COUNTY REGISTER RECRUITMENT AD FOR P/W DIR 001-150-999-5254 201.76 201.76 20580 10/13/94 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CO., I PRIZES FON HALLONEEN r.~RNIVAL 190-18~-999'5370 427.80 427.80 20581 10/13/94 001603 P U M A PHYSICAL THERAP PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-185'999'5330 112.00 112.00 20582 10/13/94 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM AND SLIDE DEVELOPMENT 190'180-9q9'5301 20582 10/13/94 O0O580 PHOTO WORKS FILM AND DEVEL~ING 001'171-999-5250 13.37 14.97 28.34 2058~ 10/13/94 PONEO, STACEY REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190'183-4980 37.00 37.00 20584 10/13/94 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. 20584 10/13/94 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. SPRVSR PRTBL PUBLICATIOR 190-180-999-5228 BREAXTHROUGH RAPID PUBLICATION 190-180-999-5228 49.21 37.61 86.82 20c"~ 10/13/94 001017 PRICE SECURITY SYSTEM SECURITY C~JARD SERVICE AT CRC 190-182-999-3250 180.00 180.00 10/15/94 000947 RANCHO SELL BLUEPRINT C PALA CUMM PRK BLUEPRINTS 210-190-120-5802 5.82 5.82 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCNO CALIFORNIA WATER 20587 10/13/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 205~ 10/13/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 20588 10/13/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 20589 10/13/94 001634 REED, MARIETTA 20590 10/13/94 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR 20590 10/13/94 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR 20591 10/13/94 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK 01-06-84300-1 08/11-09/13/94 100-164-601-5240 SERVICE FSON 08/08/94-09/08/94 190-180o999-5240 SERVICE FROM 08/08/94-09/08/94 190-181-999-5240 SERVICE FROM 08/08/94-09/08/94 190-182-999-5240 SESVICE FROM 08/08/94-09/08/94 191-180-999-5240 SERVICE FROM 08/08/94-09/08/94 193-180-999-5240 BLDG & MAINT SUPPLIES MISC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 190-180-999-3212 PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-18~-999-5330 PARKING CITATION SEPT 94 001-2260 PARKING CITATION SEPT 94 001*2265 APERTURE CARDS FOR ENG. DEPT, 001-163-999-5220 19.77 4,107.18 107.54 2,160.61 232.18 1,938.91 237.94 46.55 256.00 140.00 150.00 5.00 8,566.19 ZBz~.49 256.00 290.00 5.00 20592 10/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 20592 10/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/[NLAND OIL 20592 10/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 20592 10/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 2O592 40/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 20592 10/13/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 20593 10/13/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE RECYCLE PAINT FOR GRAFFITI REM 001-165-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 100-164-601-5263 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-110-999-5263 100-164-601-5218 20. 3/13/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51-7'/-905-5795-01 8/16-9/30 191-180-999-5240 56.13 60.65 345.50 90.97 109.45 59.43 37.93 26.60 722.13 37.93 26.60 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 4 10/13/94 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NbtqBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 20595 10/13/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20595 10/13/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20595 10/1]/94 000537 SOLrrHERN CALIF EDISON 20595 10/1]/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20595 10/1]/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20595 10/1]/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20596 10/13/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 52-77-796-7050-02 9/2-10/3194 190-180-999-5240 52-77-899-0011-02 09/1-10/1/9 193-180-999-5240 52-77-899-1935-02 9/1-10/1/94 190-180-999-5240 52-7?-899-2622-02 9/1-10/01/94 193-180-999-5240 53-77-800-1403-01 9/1-10/3/94 191-180*999-5319 53-77-850-2948-01 9/2-10/3/94 191-180-999-5319 909 214-1074 WE 0O1-110-999-5208 2,015.88 14.40 18.36 14.40 34.72 42.20 36.]4 2,139.96 36.]4 20597 10/13/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T 20597 10/13/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T 20597 10/13/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T VEHICLE HA[NT 8UILD & SAFETY VEHICLE MA%NT BUILD & SAFETY REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-162-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-110-999-5214 31.67 ~0.9~ 30.70 83.36 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20598 10/13/94 000294 STATE FUND 20599 10/13/94 STEDMARK SAN FRANCI SAN FRANCI SAN FRANCI SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANCI SAN FRANCI SAN FRANCI SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANC[ SAN FRANC[ WORKERS COMPENSATION*SEPTEMBER 001-2370 ~ORICERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 001-1182 WORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 100-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 165-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 190-2370 ~IORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 191-2370 WORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 192-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 193-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 280-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 300-2370 k~ORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 320-2370 ~ORKERS COMPENSATION*SEPTEMBER ]]0-2370 WORKERS COMPENSATION-SEPTEMBER 340°2370 SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 190-2900 4,550.8~ 107.52 1,852.33 48.90 2,055.00 103.39 4.40 146.87 27.48 10,45 26.26 11.22 345.69 100.00 9,290.39 100.00 20600 10/13/94 000574 SUPER TONER HP LASER TONER [[[ (REFURB) 320-199-999-5221 20600 10/13/94 000574 SUPER TONER TAX 320-199-999-5221 450.00 34.88 484.8~ 20601 10/13/94 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE, INC, OFFICE CONFIGURATION 20602 10/13/94 001497 T R W - INFORMAT[OR SER CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS 001-161-999-5250 280-199-999-5250 150.00 50.00 150.00 50.00 20603 10/13/94 001620 TEMECULA CARPET GREEN TURF CARPET FOR FLOAT 20604 10/13/94 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC TRAMS, TO A[RPORT/R,ROBERTS 190-183-999-5370 001-100-999-5258 120.00 240.00 120.00 240.00 20605 10/13/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. POOL TROPHIES 190-182-999-5]01 19,40 19.40 20606 10/13/94 001633 TEMECULA VALLEY ECONORI ECONOR[C DEVEL MEETING 10/20/9 001-110-999-5260 25.00 25.00 20607 10/13/94 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & TCSD MAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILI 190-180-999-5212 269.88 20608 10/13/94 001487 TIERMA MECHANICAL, [NC, 20608 10/13/94 001487 TIERRA MECHANICAL, INC. CRC HEAT/AIR MAINT CONTRACT 190-182-999-5212 SR CNTR HEAT/AIR MAINT CONTRAC 190-181-999-5212 250.00 89.00 339.00 20609 10/13/94 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS CABLE IDENTIFIER 320-199-999'5242 90.00 20609 10/13/94 001545 TIME MOT[ON TOOLS FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 4.47 VQLI' CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 10/ 14:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOI~CHER/ CHECK NLAqBER 20609 20609 20609 20609 20610 20610 20610 20611 20612 20612 20613 20614 20615 CHECK VENDOR VEND(~ ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/15/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 10/13/94 001545 TIME NOTION TOOLS TAX 001545 TIME NOTION TOOLS UNIVERSAL CABLE 001545 TIME MOTION T(X3LS FRE[GHT 001545 T[NE MOTION TOOLS TAX 000320 T(NNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 T(Aa4E CENTER STATIONERS ACCOONT NONBER 001209 VAULT, THE 320-199'999-5242 3ZO-199'999'SZ21 320-199'999-5221 3ZO'199'999-SZ21 001437 VIRACK, ~t~RYANN 001437 VIPjkCKw MARYANN OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE SUPPLIES'PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5220 100-164~604-5220 100-164-60~-5220 COURIER SERVICE ON 09/26/94 330-199-999-5277 001632 000345 PMT TO TC~ INSTRUCTC~t PNT TO TCSO [NSTRUCTON 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 WATT HONES SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 190-2900 WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOL MEMBERSHIP FOR SAN DIEOO CONSO 001-150'999-5248 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE FOR COPIES 8/26-9/330-199-999-5239 [TEN ANOONT 6.98 40. O0 3.18 3.10 17.92 15.69 15.8~. 20.00 140.00 160.00 100,00 156.06 1,193.91 CHECK AJqOONT 147.75 49.45 20.00 300.00 100.00 156.06 1,193.91 TOTAL CHECKS 41,513.72 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA '" 9 10/20/9~ 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERInnS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~/Nnn SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNZTY SERVICES DISTRZCT 191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY ' 300 INSURANCE FUNO 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES AMOUNT 36,002.2~ 13,520.72 255.42 22,593.55 1,711.79 3,680.73 293,80 1,336.12 993.39 1,052.32 TOTAL 81,888,~0 V~ ? CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 1C , 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECX CHECX VENDOR VENDOR NUNBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ZTEH CHECX DESCRIPTION NUMBER ANOUNT AMOUNT 20616 10/17/94 001417 STERLING, STEV~N REINB. FOR CERTIFIED POOL OPER 190'180'9q9'5261 65.00 65.00 20617 10/20/94 0001~. COSTCO MNOLESALE EHPLOYEE PICNIC SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 150.00 150.00 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX CIRS) 402757 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX CiRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FiRSTAX ([RS) 402757 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/Z0/94 00028.3 FIRSTAX (IRS) 40P'~=7 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (iRS) 4 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 4~ 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 402757 10/20/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 001-2070 11,062.56 00028~ FEDERAL 100-2070 2,151.66 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 103.25 0002Rx FEDERAL 190-2070 2,557.6~ 00028~ FEDERAL 191-2070 53.96 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 221.83 00028~ FEDERAL 280-2070 30.24 0002R~ FEDERAL 300-2070 87.98 00028~ FEDERAL 320-20?0 279.83 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 97.81 00028~ FEDERAL 340-2070 159.36 000285 NEDICARE 001-2070 2,676.38 000285 MEDICARE 100-2070 526.86 00028~ MEDICARE 165-2070 20.88 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 685.93 000283 NEOICARE 191-2070 18.80 000283 NEDICARE 193-2070 65.66 000283 NEDICARE 280-2070 11.64 000283 HEDiCARE 300-2070 22.43 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 58.36 00028~ MEDICARE 330-2070 24.52 000283 MEDICARE 3/,0-2070 67.62 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044-~ SOl 001-2070 519.65 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 100-2070 135.22 43~54 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+/+ SDI 190-2070 208.95 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000/+44 SOl 191-2070 8.43 43?'854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/,4 SOl 193-2070 29.43 437854 10/20/94 000/./.4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00~ SOl 300-2070 3.58 437854 10/20/94 000/~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~+4 SOl 330-2070 10.99 437854 10/20/94 O00~J+ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~.4 SDI 340-2070 26.57 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 3,001.16 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 537.04 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 165-2070 22.08 437854 10/20/94 000~44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/44 STATE 190-2070 524.86 437554 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 19.22 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 49.63 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 8.48 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000Z~44 STATE 300-2070 30.04 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 64.13 437854 10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 19.13 437854:10/20/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 19.23 20621 10/20/94 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SPORTS PROGRAMS AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 582.87 20,985.22 5,2]7.82 582.87 2c 10/20/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO., INC. BTF XXXL RAIN GEAR 100-164-601-5218 64.28 2t 10/20/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO.I iNC. AHS XXXL RAiN GEAR 100-16~-601-5218 64.28 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA P'~ 2 10/20/94 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT NUNBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEN AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20622 10/20/94 000534 A F JOHNSON CO., INC. AHS XL MAIN GEAR 20622 10/20/94 00053/, A F JOHNSON CO., INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 100-164*601-5218 84.42 16.50 229.48 20623 10/20/94 001086 ADCO EQUIPMENT SALES CUTTERS BITS FOR BARTEL 20623 10/20/94 001086 ADCO EQUIPMENT SALES FREIGHT 20623 10/20/94 001086 ADCO EQUIPMENT SALES TAX 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-16/.-601-5218 360.00 10.00 27.90 397.90 20624 10/20/94 AHN, JOON REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-18:5-4975 50.00 50.00 20625 10/20/94 000101 APPLE ONE TEMP HELP M/E 10/08/94 280-199-999-5250 258.00 258.0O 20626 10/20/94 000195 ASCOH HASLER MAILING SY RESET POSTAGE NETER 330-199-999-5239 15.00 15.00 20627 10/20/94 BITTNER, SUSAN SEOURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 190-2900 100.00 100,00 20628 10/20/94 000129 CAL I/EST RENTAL CENTER PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL EGUiP 190-180-999-52~8 20628 10/20/94 000129 CAL NEST RENTAL CENTER PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL E~UIP 19D-180-999-5238 215.94 87.28 303.22 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20629 10/20/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE 7776444'C1 7771989*c1 7771989'CI T'/71989wcI T/71989*CI 7771989*CI 7771989'CI 7771989'ci 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 D01-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 41.82 9.68 18.59 114.61 31.75 31.75 12.00 31 .~ 291.95 20630 10/20/94 CALVERT~ PAM REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-183-6982 30.00 30,00 20631 10/20/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HARDMARE - STREET SIGNS 100-164-601-5244 96.Z~, 20632 10/20/94 000980 COAST IRRX~TION SUPPLY 20632 10/20/94 000980 COAST IRRI~TION SUPPLY 20632 10/20/94 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 20632 10/20/94 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 20633 10/20/94 COFFMAN, KATHERINE 20634 10/20/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO 20634 10/20/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQUIP IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQUIP IRRIGATION PARTS & EQUIP. IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQUIP REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS VEHICLE PAINT, PUBLIC ~ORKS VEHICLE MAINT. PUBLIC gORKS 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-4982 001-165-999-5214 100-164-604-5214 23.~ 321.01 631.55 66.44 35.00 7O.64. 10.93- 1,042.66 35.00 59.71 20635 10/20/94 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. 20635 10/20/94 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. 20636 10/20/94 001029 OATAQUICK 20637 10/20/94 001542 DEFABIIS, BEAN-PAUL MIC 20638 10/20/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 20639 10/20/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS HAY FOR HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS CD'ROR ACCESS FOR OCT 94 PAINTING FOR HAUNTED HOUSE GROUND COVER PLANTINGS OR BRID EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 190-183-999-5370 100-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5250 190-183-999-5370 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5230 20. O0 3.84 62.60 137.50 525.00 9.50 23.84 62.60 137.50 525.00 V~' ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 10 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER CHECK AMOUNT 2Otto 10/20/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 206/.0 10/20/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 20640 10/20/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C RDA MEETING IN TOWN 8/5/94 HOTEL FOR 9/10/94 CONFERENCE IN TOWN MEETING ON 9/8/94 280-199-999-5264 001-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5260 78.00 142.72 15.65 236.37 20641 10/20/94 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE MISC SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REM 100-164-601-5218 189.]9 189.39 20642 10/20/94 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL ~40-199-999-5250 152.79 152.79 206~3 10/20/94 000949 G K N RENTALS SKIPLOADER RENTAL 100-164-601-5238 I]8.60 138.60 20644 10/20/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-8652 GEM 320-199-999-5208 17.22 17.22 20645 10/20/94 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD DECEMSER 94 RENT 190'180-999'5234 20645 10/20/94 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD DECEMBER 94 RENT 100'164"601'5234 20645 10/20/94 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD NOVEMBER 94 RENT 190-180'999-5234 20645 10/20/94 00116~ GABRIEL, RICHARD NOVEMBER 94 RENT 100'164-601'5234 20646 10/20/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROUUCT 20646 10/20/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 206/,6 10/20/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR THE CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 280.00 420.00 280.00 420.00 60.61 108.92 5.27 1,400.00 174.80 10/20/94 0016~0 GOLDEN SPECTRUM BINGO EQUIPMENT FOR SR CENTER 190-181-999-5301 100.00 100,00 20648 10/20/94 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANy, SECURITY ALARM MONITORING C HA 340-199-999-5250 206A9 10/20/94 HOOGE, DAVID REFUND FOR TCSD GLASS 190-183-4982 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.0O 20650 10/20/94 000663 I A P M 0 MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR G YATES 001-150'999-5226 20.00 ZO.O0 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT THUS 000194 DEF CONP 001'2080 1,188.00 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CORP 100-2080 248.62 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP 190-2080 3~.82 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 191-2080 74.53 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CORP 193-2080 91.08 20651 10/20/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP 300-2080 37.49 20651 10/20/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT THUS 000194 DEF COHP 340-2080 15.90 20652 10/20/94 001637 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES INTERIM DIRECTOR OF PW SERVICE 100-164-604-5250 20653 10/20/94 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. SUPPLIES FOR HAUNTED HOUSE 190-183-999-5370 4,400.00 100.00 Z,028J~. 4,400,00 100.00 20654 10/20/94 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 20654 10/20/94 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISt POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 20654 10/20/94 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 20655 10/20/94 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE COMPUTER REPAIR SERVICE ]20-199-999-5215 20656 10/20/94 000386 LANIER VOICE PROOUCT$ 24- 60m TAPES FOR PW MEETINGS 100-164-604-5220 20656 10/20/94 000386 LANIER VOICE PROOUCTS FREIGHT 100-164-604-5220 20t q0/20/94 000386 LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS TAX 100-164-604-5220 48.29 22.47 55.50 134.20 120,00 2.70 9.30 126,26 134.20 132.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA P° ' 4 10/20/94 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20657 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 2O661 20662 20662 2066~ 2066~ 20665 20665 206~5 206~5 20665 20665 20665 206~5 20665 20665 20665 20665 206~5 20665 20665 20665 20665 20665 20665 206~5 20665 20665 20665 20666 20666 206~6 206~6 20666 20666 20666 2066~ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 I0/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LITTLE, TERI 001142 MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES MCCAUGHEY, PAUL 001030 MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, 001030 MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL PAGING NETWORK 000635 PARTY PALACE, THE 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESI RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS 5MPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS 5MPLQYEES~ RETIRE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ITEM DESCRIPTION MAIHT FOR TCSD VEHICLES CITY MANAGER VEHICLE NAINT REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS PROF SERVICES FOR SEPT, 94 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS MISC TAPES CARD, MICROFILM MISC TAPES CARD, MICROFILM WHZTE PREMIX PAINT TAX REFUND OF SECURITY DEPOSIT SUPPLIES FOR HAUNTED HOUSE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 0002(,6 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RST 000246 PERS SET 000246 PERS RET 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIME. PETTY CASH REIM8. PETTY CASH REINS. PETTY CASH REINS. PETTY CASH REIM8. PETTY CASH REIME. ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5214 001-110-999-5214 190-183-497'5 100-164-603-5248 190-183-4982 330-199-999-5277 330-199-999-52T7 100-16~,-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 190-2900 190-18~-999-5370 00t-2130 001-2390 100-2.390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 193-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2]90 001-~90 100-2~90 165-2190 190-2390 191-2390 193-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-71~90 330-2390 340-2~90 001-161-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 100-164-602o5260 001-110-999-5258 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 100-164-604-5220 ITEM ANOUNT 107.43 115.90 25.00 42.85 36.00 347.28 357.92 ~0.00 26.35 100.00 30.00 43.06 12,038.71 2,266.67 108.8~ 2,608.55 94.59 325.16 61.17 106.82 268.21 119.81 308.85 49.07 10.78 .37 .42 1.44 .19 .46 .93 .93 2.00 10.34 3.00 36.00 20.00 10.50 15.00 6.14 7.00 CHECK AMOUNT 223.33 25.00 42.85 36.00 705.20 366.35 100.00 30.00 18,430.42 VOU' ~ ' CITY OF TENECULA 10, 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NLINBER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK ANC)UNT 20666 10/20/94 000249 PETTY CASH 206~ 10/20/94 000249 PETTY CJ~SH PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIHB. 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 15.14 7.00 130.12 20667 10/20/94 000580 PHOTO WORKS Z0668 10/20/94 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES 190~180-999-5301 INSTALL SELF-LOCKING LOCK PW 340-199-999-5212 8,57 184.25 8.57 184.25 20669 10/20/94 000546 RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD I¢OEN DUPLEX JACK 320-199-999-5221 4,30 4.30 20670 10/20/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVICE FOR 8/15-9/15/94 190-180-999-5240 20670 10/20/94 000262 RANCRO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVICE FOR 8/15-9/15/94 191-180-999-5240 20670 10/20/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVICE FOR 8/15-9/15/94 193-180-999-5240 20671 10/20/94 0012&1 REED# JIM 20672 10/20/94 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE 20672 10/20/94 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE REIHB. FOR CERTIFIED POOL ORER APPLIED WRITING CLASS APPLIED ~RITING CLASS 190-180-999-5261 001-163-999-5261 001-161-999-5261 327.60 114.90 2,371.50 65,00 55.00 55.00 2,814.00 65.00 110.00 206?3 10/20/94 000266 RIGHTWAY PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 100-164-601-5238 57.39 57.39 20~TM 10/20/94 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK RESEARCH FOR TR 206~BONDS 001'163'999-5250 6,50 6.50 2b 10/20/94 001169 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF RECORDING EASEMENT TR 27827-1 001-1990 20675 10/20/94 001169 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF RECORDING EASEMENT TR 27827-1 001-16~-999-5250 11.00 1.00 12.00 20676 10/20/94 000725 RIVERSIDE ICE CO., INC. DRY ICE FOR HAUNTED HOUSE 190~183-99q*5370 72.00 72.00 20677 10/20/94 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190'18~-999'5330 P'xO.40 ~0.40 20678 10/20/94 RUTLEDGE, MADELINE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190'183'4982 28.00 28.00 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS PAPER DECORL POSTER 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BOOK KIDS COOK 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BOOK HANDS AROUD THE WORLD 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS MACABRE MAGNETS 20679 10/20/94 00027'7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS NEWTON PUZZLE BOX 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS EHBROIDERY BULK 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BLACK CREPE PAPER 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS PARSCRAFT 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BOOK BOTTOMLESS BAG AGAIN 20679 10/20/94 0002T7 S & S ARTS AND CMAFTS TRANSPARENT CELLOPHANE 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS ANO CRAFTS PANG SKETCHING CASE 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS MYSTERY BRACELET 20679 10/20/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS MYSTERY BRACELET 20679 10/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS Fd~LLOWEEN CANDLEHOLDERS 20679 10/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FREIGHT 20679 10/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS ASSORTED CRAFT FOAM 20679 10/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS SARGENT CRAYON EXEC. 20679 10/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS ~ASHABLE MARKERS ZOd' ~/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS AB$ORTED POMPONS 1/2" ZO~ J/20/94 0002?7 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS ASSORTED PORPONS 2" 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5]01 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999~5301 190-182-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 145.74 11.65 11.65 11.15 29.99 51.99 49.50 83.98 39.95 2.99 24.99 37.19 37.19 3.50 85.61 88.35 194.58 15.90 25.45 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA pLc~ 6 10/20/94 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 2067~ ZO&7~ 20679 2067~ 2067~ 20~7~ 20679 20679 2067~ 20679 2067~ 2067~ 2067~ 2067~ 2067~ 2067~ 20680 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20194 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS SAVAGE, BIANCA PIPE CLEANERS 12" UIGGLY EYES ASSORTED FELT JUMBO PACK FUN FUR ASSORTED CONSTRUCTION PAPER ASSORTED CONSTRUCTION PAPER UNITE PUZZLE RACK HOLDS 12 PUZZLE NOOOS 5 PIECES PUZZLE PETS 5 PIECES PUZZLE VEHICLES 6 PIECES PUZZLE FAPJ4 ANZHALS 5 PIECES REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-182-~-5301 190-182-~9-5301 190-182-9~-5301 190-182-~-5301 190-182-~-5301 190-182-~-5301 190-182-q~9-5301 190-182-~-5301 190-182-~-5301 lf0-182-~9-5301 1~0-182-~9-5301 lV0-182-~-5301 190-182-~-5301 190-182-99~-5301 190-182-~-5301 1~0-182-9~-5301 190-183-999-5330 40.50 10.68 17'5.94 71.94 61.50 16.40 37.98 17.98 26.97 26.97 26.97 40.05 59.16 122.25 228.18 7.73 100.00 1,995.59 100,00 20681 20682 10/20/94 10/20/94 SIPE, CINDY SMITH, KENNETH REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-18~-4982 190-183-4982 18,00 35,00 18,00 O0 20683 20683 20683 20683 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF 000374 SOUTHERN CALKF 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53-77-813-3192-01 9/3-10/3/94 EDISON 56-77-755-0157-01 9/7-10/6 EDISON 56-77-755-0169-01 9/7-10/6/94 EDISON 56-77-755-2147-01 9/7-10/6 190-182-9~9-5240 191-180-99~-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 221.12 54,55 13,92 6,775.62 20684 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 20685 Z0686 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON * 00037'5 SOUTHERN CALXF TELEPHON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 0003?5 SOUTHERN' CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 0003?5 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEP~ON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 001639 SUNNYVALE, CITY OF ST LIGHTING FOR 8/31-9/30/94 191-180-999-5319 909 202-4204 UE 909 202-4751 TS 909 202-4753 BH 909 202-4754 KH 909 202-4755 CITY VAN 909 202-4756 GEN 909 202-4757 JG 909 202-4758 RR 909 202-4760 JH 909 202-4761 SM 909 202-4762 RP 909 202-4763 PS 909 202-4764 S8 909 202-4765 BB 909 202-4769 JS 909 202-4770 R8 909 205-4070 MJM 909 205-7826 GEN 001-110-9<~-5208 100-1~-604-5208 190-180-~9~-5208 190-180-~-5208 190-180-9994208 320-1~9-999-5208 001-120-9q9-5208 001-100-~99-5208 100-164-603-5208 001-100-9~~5208 001-100-9~9-5208 001-100-9994208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-601-5208 001-100-9~-5208 001-110-~-5208 001-140-~-5208 320-1~-~-5208 PUBLICATIQN-RESIX~RCE ALLOCATIO 001-140-9~9-5228 1,037,35 45.10 84.49 191.13 97.40 45.06 36.34 46.05 70.06 78.28 197.42 101.19 53.48 62.51 44.35 39.49 57.08 204.98 36.75 80.00 1,037.35 1,491,16 ~O,O0 VOUr" CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 10/, 14:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20687 20688 20689 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 TANNER, CARQLYN 000309 TEMECULA COPIERS THORNTOR, ~CAL REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS MAINT ON COPIER AT FIRE STATIO REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 20690 10/20/94 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS PLACEMENT TOOL 20690 10/20/94 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS 5/8 AUGER BIT 20690 10/20/94 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS FREIGHT 20690 10/20/94 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS TAX 20691 20692 20693 20693 20695 20695 20693 206 20694 20694 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 I0/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 ~0/20/94 10/20/94 10/20/94 J/20/94 20695 20695 20695 20695 20696 20696 20696 20696 20696 20696 20696 20697 000697 TOUN AFFILIATION ASSOCI 000520 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 12/94-11/95 OFFICE SUPPLZES CORM SERVICES 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CORP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CORP 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBIL~) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (DRILl) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBIL~) 000389 PT RET[R 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 L~ 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UU 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 U~ 000525 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000525 UW 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000526 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000526 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000526 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 001437 VIRACK, RARYANN 0006(~5 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 000686 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 000~6 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 000~ VISIBLE CQIAPUTER SUPPLY 000~ VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 000~ VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 20698 20698 20698 20698 20698 20698 20699 20~ 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WERHANQ&~ICZ, MIKE UNIFORMS I~INT. FOR PW UNIFORMS MAINT FOR PW UNIFORM R~INTENANCE FOR TCSD UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR TCSD RENTAL OF FLCX~R MAT i CITY HAL RENTAL OF FOOR ~T ~ CRC RENTAL OF FLOOR MAT ~ SR CNTR PAYMENT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTON 200 ~2 6 PART CARBONLESS FORMS 200 ENV FOR W2 100 ENV FOR 1099 100 1099 NISC CAROONLESS FORMS FREIGHT TAX BLOG MAINT. SUPPLIES - CRC REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-4982 001-171-999-5217 190-183-999-5530 520-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 520-199-999-5242 001-100-999-5226 190-180-999-5220 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-601-5243 100-164-601-5245 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 540-199-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-1~-999-5350 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-182-999-5212 190-183-999-5530 ITEM AMOUNT 18.00 75.00 45.Q0 15.92 34.95 5.94 3.94 380.00 33.49 188.~J+ 265.09 5.00 312.50 50.00 293.8~ 133.36 372.56 65.85 10.05 17.00 .60 106.92 25.16 18.85 16,35 30.75 69.39 16.75 160.00 49.65 18.96 7.80 14.39 9.64 7.04 737.63 25.0O CHECK AMOUNT 18.00 7~.00 45.00 60.75 380.00 33.49 3,269.92 799.58 93.50 2&L17 160.00 107.48 737.63 25.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA P&~ 8 10/20/9~, 1~,:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER%00S VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMSER 20701 20702 CHECK DATE 10/20/9& 10/20/94 VENDOR V~NDOR ITEM NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTION 000339 UEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CA RULES OF COURT REVISED 1994 001076 ~ESTERN ~ASTE, INC. PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 001'120'999-5228 190-180"999-5~38 ITEN AMOUNT 20.70 CHECK AI~UNT 20.70 455,00 TOTAL CHECKS 81,888.40 V~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 10. 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGZSTER FOR ALL PERZOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 CONHUNZTY SERVZCE$ DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVZCE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE TOTAL ANaJNT 10,190.10 2,460.61 10.69 11,704.16 9.87 5,548.12 Z+Z+,213.71 204.96 11.~ 6#~19.1~ 11,516.68 150.00 93,326.18 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA P .... 1 10/27/94 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECX VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20618 10/20/94 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC FEE FOR EXEMPT DETERMINATION 390-199-999-5227 150.00 150.00 20703 10/20/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON EXTEND SERVICE FOR LOMA LINDA 210-190-120-5804 20704 10/21/94 000488 KNOTT~S BERRY FARM ADMISSION TICXETS 190-183~999-5350 20708 10/27/94 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PMI SPORTS PROGR~J4S AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 16,235.71 1,400.00 633.83 16,235.71 633.83 20?09 10/27/94 ABARE'PANTER~ ELIZABETH REFUND FOR CANCELLED CLASS 190-183'4980 105.00 105.00 20710 10/27/94 000495 ACT 1 PERSONNEL SERVICE TEMP HELP- W/E 9/24 & 10/1 001-161-999-5118 194.15 194.15 20711 10/27/94 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 909 204-1200 TH 320-199-999-5208 68.94 68.94 20712 10/27/94 000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C TEMP FENCE RENTAL FOR OCT 94 190-180-999-523B 145.00 145.00 20713 10/27/94 000101 APPLE ONE TEMP HELP W/E 10/08/94 280-199-999-5250 154.80 154.80 20714 10/27/94 000195 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SY METER RENTAL FOR 11/1-1/31/95 330-199-999-5239 219,75 219.75 20715 10/27/94 000914 C N 0 A CNOA TRAINING NOV. 19'22/94 001-170-999-5261 7'55.00 ?35.00 20716 10/27/94 00048~ CALIFORNIA ASSOC LOCAL CALED ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 94-95 001-110-999o5226 300.00 JO 20717 10/27/94 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY JOB RECRUITMENT AD(1100533000) 001-150-999-5254 26.40 26.40 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 20718 10/27/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL CALIFORNIAN LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE (7776400*CI PUBLIC NOTICE (7776400'CI PUBLIC NOTICE (7776400wCI PUBLIC NOTICE (?'/76400'CI PUBLIC NOTICES (7771467'CI PUBLIC NOTICE (7776400'0I PUBLIC NOTICE (7'/76400'CI PUBLIC NOTICES (7771467'CI PUBLIC NOTICE (7771467'CI PUBLIC NOTICE (7776400wCI 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 43.3? 131.65 131.65 37.17 15.10 37.95 128.55 17.42 10.45 32.52 585.83 20719 10/27/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGN STOCK FOR CITY YARD 20719 10/27/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 100-164-601-5244 100-164-601-5244 129.70 10.03 139.75 20720 10/27/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A IN0. FUEL EXPENSE Z0720 10/27/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE 20720 10/27/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE 20720 10/27/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE 20720 10/27/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE 001-110-999-5263 001-170-999-5262 001-162-999-5263 001-161-999-5262 001-163-999-5263 37.97 60.81 25.72 9.21 19.00 152.71 20721 lo/27/94 CLEMONS, PATRICiA CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 18.00 18.00 35.00 20722 10/27/94 COFFMAN, KATHERINE CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-183'4982 35.00 20723 10/27/94 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET iNSTALL ANTENNA 100-164-601-5215 141.03 VO CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 10. 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20723 20723 20724 20725 20~5 20726 20726 20726 20726 20727 20728 20729 207'3O 20732 20732 20732 20~3 20~3 207'~4 20735 20735 20735 20735 20735 20736 20736 20736 20736 20736 20736 20736 20736 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 10/27/94 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 CC~4TRONIX OF HEMET CORTENBACH, LINDA 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO 001636 CREGAR PRINTING 001636 CREGAR PRINTING 001636 CREGAR PRINTING 001636 CREGAR PRINTING 001645 DAYS INN 001648 DE ANZA HARBOR RESORT 001542 DEFABIIS, SEAM-PAUL NIC 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANII~L HOS 001572 EMPLOYERS GR(3Jp, THE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST iNTERSTATE BANK C 001638 FLAG HART 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 00018/+ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA * PAYM 00017'/ GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017'7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177'7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER RADIO SERVICE REPAIRS RADIO SERVICE REPAIRS 100-164-601-5215 001-16~-999-5250 CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-18]-4982 VEHICLE MAINT. FOR PW VEHICLE HAINT. FOR PUBLIC 100-164-601-5214 100-164-601-5214 2 PT NCR INSPECTION REQUEST PW 001-1~-999-5222 2 PT NCR INSPECTION REQUEST PU 100-164-604-5222 TAX 001-163-999-5222 TAX 100-164-604-5222 LODGING FON gKSHP 11/1/94 KH 190-180-999-5261 LODGING FOR CNOA gKSHP 11/19-2 001-170o999-5261 FINAL PMT FOR PAINTING OF NAUN 190-183-999-5370 MEDI~L CARE FOR POLICE DOG 001-170-999-5327 WKERS CONP WKSHP 11/30 FOR GY 001-150-999-5260 SPTS PRK-REPAIRED MAIN LINE 190-180-999-5415 SPTS PRK-REPAIRED 2 MA%N LINES 190-180-999-5415 SPTS PRK-REPLACE BROKEN VALVE 190-180-999-5415 NAT LEAGUE CITIES&MEET IN TO~4N 001-100-999-5260 NAT LEAGUE CITIES&MEET IN TOt4N 001-100-999-5258 FLAGS OF JAPAN & BASES 001-100-999-5258 909 181-11Z] GEN 909 694-1993 GEN 909 695-3564 GEN 909 699-2475 PW 909 699-7945 GEN 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999o5208 100-164-601-5208 320-199-999-5208 OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR THE CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-140~999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 87.71 73.32 18.00 106.58 31.80 1~.25 62.75 14.59 4.86 53.90 82.89 137.50 35.17 185.00 306.75 480.07 21.92 17.63 335.00 29.33 611.13 975.05 33.34 32.28 35.29 59.23 34.48 32.22 11.31 10.72 34,48 60.06 26.13 CHECK AMOUNT 302.06 18.00 138.38 270.45 53.90 82.89 137.50 35.17 185.00 808.74 352.63 29.33 1,687.09 268.63 207'J7 10/27/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO LASER IL~MBOARD Ill W/ZMB RAM 320-199-999-5221 500.00 20737 10/27/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 5.00 20' '0/27/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRAJ3ING CO TAX 320-199-999-5221 38.75 543.75 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA n'-- 3 10/27/94 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTION NLR~BER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT Z0738 10/27/94 GRABAU~ ARLENE REFUND - TCSO CLASS 190-183-4980 20739 10/27/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COHPAN SPEAKER PHONE FOR CRC 320-199-999-5221 6.00 196.42 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 001-2360 597.00 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 100-2.~60 116.00 20740 10/27/94 001556 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 165-2360 4.00 20740 10/27/94 001556 HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE 001556 LIFE INS 190-2360 144.50 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 191-2560 4.50 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 193-2360 15.50 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 280-2~60 2.00 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 300-2360 5.00 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 320-2360 10.00 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 330-2360 10.00 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LIFE INS 540-2~60 21.50 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 001-2380 651.87 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 100-2.]80 115.01 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 165-2380 5.64 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 190-2380 141.59 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 191-2380 4.53 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001556 LTD 193-~x80 16.10 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 280-2580 3.17 20740 10/27/94 001556 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001556 LTD 500-2~80 5.42 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 320-2380 15.89 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 330-2.]80 5.93 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 LTD 340-2~80 14.87 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 001-2500 115.75 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 100-2500 21.37 ~0740 10/27/94 001556 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001556 STD 165-2500 1.05 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 190-2500 26.54 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 191-2500 .84 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 193-2500 2.99 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STO 280-2500 .59 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001556 STD 500-2500 1.01 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 320-2500 2.58 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 330-2500 1.10 20740 10/27/94 001536 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 001536 STD 340-2500 2.76 6.00 196,42 2,064.40 20742 10/27/94 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001'150'999-5250 328.25 328.25 20743 10/27/94 0016~1 NENNESSY, LENORA PARADE FLYERS FOR TCSD 190-18~-999-5570 20.00 20,00 20744 10/27/94 HUMES REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 35.00 55.00 20745 10/27/94 0016/.9 INLAND AREA PERSONNEL YR MEMBERSHIP FOR GRANT YATES 001-150-999-5226 20.OO 20.00 20746 10/27/94 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL MISC POOL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 521.96 321.96 20747 10/27/94 001186 IRWIN, JOHN PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330 20748 10/27/94 000203 JOSS AVAILABLE, INC. RECRUITMENT ANNOUNCEMENT 001-150-999-5254 89.60 213.12 89.60 3.12 v~' CTTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10, 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM CHECX AMOUNT AMOUNT 20749 10/27/94 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. WICKED WITCH FOR TCSD CLASS 190-18~-999-5320 75.00 75.00 20750 10/27/94 000209 L & M FERTILIZER,/NC. MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 71.47 71.47 20751 10/27/94 001607 L D D S COMMUNICATIONS LONG DIST. SERVICE FOR SEPT 94 520-199-999-5208 20?52 10/27/94 LENEKER, MOMIQUE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-18~-4975 2,291.72 2,291.72 50.00 50.00 20?55 10/27/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER MAINT. FOR TCSD VEHICLES 190-180-999-5214 20?53 10/27/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-162-999-5214 156.31 345.12 501.43 20?54 10/27/94 000653 LUCKY STORE SUPPLIES FOR COOKIES MONSTER 190-183-999~5320 50.00 50.00 20?55 10/27/94 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING SISTER CITY MEETING 001-100-999~5258 200.00 200.00 20?56 10/27/94 001646 MAY, DORIAN FOG MACHINE FOR HAUNTED HOUSE 190-18~-999~5370 100.00 100.00 20?57 10/27/94 MEEKER, ]CATHERINE CANCELLATION - TCSD CLASS 190-183-999-5330 20?58 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 20'~' 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 2 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 2b 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 20?58 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR TCSD 190-180'999'5301 20?58 10/27/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-180-999~5301 20?59 10/27/94 001030 MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I MISC TAPES CARD, MICROFILM 330-199'999'5277 20759 10/27/94 001030 MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I MISC TAPES CARD, MICROFILM 330'199-999-5277 20?60 10/27/94 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI TUBE SLIDE / EXIT SECTION 190-180'999'5212 20?60 10/27/94 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI FREIGHT 190-180'999'5212 20760 10/27/94 0009?3 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI TAX 190-180-999'5212 20761 10/27/94 MORRIS, ROBERT REFUND FOR PA94'0045 001'161-4119 20761 10/27/94 MORRISI ROBERT REFUND FOR PA94-0045 001-163'4388 20762 10/27/94 000231 N B S/LOWRY, INC. ADDT'L SERVICES-MORAGA WIDEN 100-164-603-5E48 20?63 10/27/94 000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMP SERVICES THRU 10/9 001-162-999-5118 20763 10/27/94 000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMP SERVICES THRU 10/9 001-162-999-5118 18.00 18.00 45.39 25.08 45.94 46.45 74.57 1.50 238.93 432.37 20.87 453.24 80.00 14.24 6.20 100.42. 176.00 14.00 190.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 ?58.94 177.06 956.00 20764 10/27/94 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AD 20765 10/27/94 OROZCO, YOLANDA REFUND - TCSD EVENT 001-150-999-5254 253.32 253.32 190-183-4986 28.00 28.00 20766 10/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-100-999-5258 20766 10/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-100-999-5260 20766 10/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE1MB. 001-140-999-5260 2076~ 10/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-161-999-5258 20' 0/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMS. 001-163-999-5260 20, 0/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMN. 100-164-602-5260 25.00 4.27 43.35 17.50 6.41 30.00 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEHECtJLA ' ~ 5 10/27/94 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VCXJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NLIHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20766 10/27/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-183-999-5320 20767 10/27/94 000580 PHOTO WORKS PICTURE DEVELOPING 001-161-999-5224 99.14 6.47 225.67 6.47 20768 10/27/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CORPAN DISPLAY AD SEPT. 16 FRIDAY 001-120-999-5254 20768 10/27/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COMPAN DISPLAY AD SEPT. 20 TUESDAY 001-120-9q9-5254 20768 10/27/94 000254 PRESS°ENTERPRiSE CORPAN AD-OLD TO~N ENTERTAINMENT PRJ 280-199-999-5254 20768 10/27/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN ADVERTISING - REC ASST. 001-150-999-5254 28.00 28.00 ~4.40 92.6~ 193,04 20769 10/27/94 001017 PRICE SECURITY SYSTEM CRC SECURITY SERVICE 190-180-999-5250 60.00 60.00 20770 10/27/94 000546 RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD CD PLYR FOR HOLD ON TELEPHONE 320-199-999-5221 237.02 237.02 20771 10/27/94 001253 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS WORKING COlel. PUBLICATION 1YR 001-161-999-5228 97.00 97.00 20772 10127/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVICE 8/23-9/22/94 20772 10/27/94 000262 RANCHQ CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVICE 8/23-9/22/94 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 2,509.23 5,513,53 8,022.76 20773 10/27/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 20773 10/27/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 207?3 10/27/94 000907 PJ~NCHO CAR WASH 207'74 10/27/94 000426 RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL 20774 10/27/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 20774 10/27/94 000426 RANCRO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL CAR MASHES FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5214 CAR WASHES-TCSD ~HECLES 190-180-999-5214 CAR WASH & MAINT. FOR LAND OEV 001-163-999-5214 MISC SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CTR MISC SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CTR MISC, JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 25.07 17.50 16.00 72,31 92,08 14,49 178.88 20775 10/27/94 001605 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PW92-10 210-165-625-5804 78.00 78.00 20776 10/27/94 RQORIGUEZ, JUDITH REFUND - TCSD CLASS 190-18~-4982 65.00 65.00 2077?' 10/27/94 000459 RUFF & TUMBLE PMT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330 207'/8 10/27/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FIGURINES FOR HALLOWEEN 190-180-999-5301 207'/8 10/27/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FREIGHT 190-180-~99-5301 1,960.00 7.99 1,960.00 12.74 20779 10/27/94 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT AD FOR P/W DIM 001-150-999-5254 215.05 215.05 20780 10/27/94 000751 SKILLPATH, INC. INDISPENSABLE ASSIST ~KSHP 20781 10/27/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP 11-8272-901-575t-3 CRC 001-140-999-5261 190-182-999-5240 99.00 1,442.73 99.00 1,442.73 20782 10/27/94 00037~ SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4752 SN 20782 10/27/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4759 20782 10/27/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALiF TELEPHON 909 202-4767 GH 190-180-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 001-161-999-5208 89.44 62.08 58.73 210.25 20783 10/Z7/94 000291 SPES DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 001-162-999-5214 76.79 20784 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 NAMEPLATE; PANEL MOUNT 001-162-999-5220 20784 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 NAMEPLATE ONLY 001-120-999-5220 20784 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FRE|GHT 001-120-999-5220 20784 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 001-162-999-5220 21.60 32.40 2.00 2.00 VO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 10 11:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER MANE 20784 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 2078/-+ 10/27/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 20785 10/27/94 TANG, DEBBIE 20786 10/27/94 000305 TARGET STORE 20787 10/27/94 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES 20787 10/27/94 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES 20788 10/27/94 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO 20789 10/27/94 001602 TP,~UTWEIN CONSTRUCTION 20789 10/27/94 001602 TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION 20789 10/27/94 001602 TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION 20790 10/27/94 001209 VAULT, THE 207~1 10/27/94 001474 VORTEX DATA SYSTEMS 207~ 10/27/94 ~AGONER, CARRIE 2~ 10/27/94 UALLACE, SUSAN 20794 10/27/94 WEILERT, JAN 207~5 10/27/94 000335 WESTERN CiTY MAGAZINE 20796 10/27/94 000466 WHITEHEAD, RHONDA 20797 10/27/94 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC 20797 10/27/94 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC 20798 10/27/94 001647 WISE, MIKE ITEM DESCRIPTION TAX TAX REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS RECREATION SUPPLIES MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE - CITY MOTORCYCLES AGENCY FEES FOR TiP/1ST FY GTR CONST LONG VLLY WASH CHANNEL CONST LONG VLLY WASH CHANNEL IOX RETENTION INVOICE 941012 NISC APERTURE CARDS NETWORK TI~iNING COURSE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS OVERPMT ON MS93-Z677/PA93*0193 AD FOR P~4/CITY ENG DIRECTOR PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR NOVEMBER RENT OCTOBER CAM FOG JUICE FOR HAUNTEO HOUSE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5220 001-120-~99-5220 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5301 001-170-~-5214 001-170-9~9-5214 001-171-~q~-5274 210-166-6/,9-5804 210-1990 210-2035 330-199-999-5277 320-199-~q-5261 190-183-4975 190-183-4982 001-2650 001-150-999-5254 190-183-999-5330 340-199-9~q-5234 340-199-~-5234 190-18~-~99-5370 1.63 2.56 40.00 99.55 269.98 218.05 1,312.50 59.48 3,100.00- 196.70 1,400.00 50.00 18.00 5.00 378.00 ~.00 8,803.60 30.00 CHECK AMOUNT 62.19 40.00 99.55 488.03 1,312.50 27,900.00 196.70 1,400.00 50,00 18.00 5.00 378.00 64.00 11#477.55 30.00 TOTAL CHECKS 93,326.18 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA ' 10 11/03/94 15:40 VIXJCHER/CNECN REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/HOD SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORNATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACZLITIES 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE TOTAL ANOUNT 59,637.42 12,093.26 452.52 24,061.13 4,591.16 50~.13 1,857.63 17,154.15 8&1.46 1,088.13 4,3~.70 3,684.~ 4,119.84 315.00 1~4,7~7.76 VQU CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE I 11/ 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD GTR UNEMPLOY & TRAIN TAX 001-2350 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD QTR UNENPLOY & TPJ~IN TAX 100-2350 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD QTR UNENPLOY & TRAIN TAX 190-2350 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD QTR UNEMPLOY & TRAIN TAX 192-2380 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD QTR UNEMPLOY & TRAIN TAX 340-2350 20799 10/28/94 000160 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 3RD QTR UNEMPLOY & TRAIN T~J( 190-2070 20801 10/28/94 001360 CALIFORNIA BUILDING COO SEMINAR FOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 001-162-999-5261 1,832.97 128.07 5,762.28 6.99 12.41 11.43 350.00 5,754.15 350.00 20802 10/28/94 001567 MALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO KENT HINDERGARDT PARK CONST. 210-190-136-5804 20802 10/28/94 001567 MALEX GENERAL CQNTRACTO 10% RETENTION INV. 002 210-2035 20803 11/01/94 001542 DEFABIIS, SEAN-PAUL MIC PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-9<~9-5330 18,364.50 1,836.45- 67~.00 16,528.05 672.00 20804 11/01/94 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC BAL FOR DETERMINATION LETTER 390-199-999-5227 315.00 315.00 4107'/5 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 $DI 001-2070 514.72 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOI 100-2070 132.58 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 $DI 190-2070 235.85 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDZ 191-2070 7.89 4107, 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 192-2070 10.37 41 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ SDI 193-2070 28.77 41b 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+/. SDI 280-2070 3.08 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDZ 300-2070 3.58 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SD[ 330-2070 11.10 4107/5 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SD[ 340-2070 25.19 4107'/5 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 2#840.95 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/.4 STATE 100-2070 538.67 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 165-2070 22.08 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 00044/. STATE 190-2070 564.52 4107'75 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/,4 STATE 191-2070 15.86 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 9.06 4107'75 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 45.51 410~ 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+4 STATE 280-2070 9.58 4107'/5 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 30.04 4107'/5 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 64.15 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 19.64 410775 11/03/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044/, STATE 340-2070 16.05 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 10,787.86 416849 11/03/94 000Z83 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,154.83 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 103.25 416849 11/05/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,814.53 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 47.73 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 71.74 416849 '11/05/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 214.22 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 42.44 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300~2070 87.98 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320~2070 27~.83 416F 1/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 99.11 416, 1/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0002~ FEDERAL 340-2070 143.60 5,149.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA ' 2 11/03/94 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOG ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECX CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT XTEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 4168~9 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 0002R'x MEDZCARE 001-2070 2,650.99 4168~9 11/03/94 000283 FZRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 100-2070 S26.30 416849 11/03/94 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 165-2070 20.88 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 190-2070 748.48 ~168~9 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS] 00028] MEDICARE 191-2070 17.60 416849 11/03/94 000Z8~ FIRSTAX (IRS] 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2t.12 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] MEDICARE 193-2070 64.20 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0002Rx MEDICARE 280-2070 16.02 41~:~/+9 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 300-2070 22.43 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] MEDICARE 320-2070 58.36 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 24.76 416849 11/03/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 64.76 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 414.16 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-2310 91.18 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 6.68 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 62.65 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANE 000116 AVP 191-2310 4.39 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193~2310 5.36 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 3.34 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-Z310 2.44 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70 20808 11/03/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP COBR 001-1180 9.75 20809 11/03/94 000558 ADVANCED MOBILECONN 20810 11/03/94 001149 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV 20811 11/03/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20811 11/03/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20811 11/03/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20812 11/03/94 000474 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE 20812 11/03/94 000474 ARBOR*PRO TREE SERVICE 20813 11/03/94 00132] ARROWHEAD WATER 20814 11/03/94 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, 20815 11/03/94 000413 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH 20816 11/03/94 001528 CALIFOGNIA DEPT OF JUST 20817 11/03/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 20817 11/03/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 20818 11/03/94 001326 CHULA VISTA, CITY OF MOBILE COVERAGE 320-199-999-5209 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 001-165-999-5226 TEMP HELP W/E 10/15/94 TEMPORARY HELP W/E 10/26/94 TEMPORARY HELP W/E 10/26/94 280-199-999-5250 001-140-999-5118 280-199-999-5250 16 TREES TO BE TRIMMED ADDITIONAL TREES TRIMMED 100-164-601-5402 100-164-601-5402 PW YARD DRINKING WATER 100-164-601-5240 ADD AUTO PHYS DAMAGE INSURANCE 300-199-999-5201 EXTENSION OF 1601 AGREEMENT 210-190-120-5804 FINGERPRINT CARD PROCESSING 001-150-999-5250 SPECIAL SIGN FOG PRJT PW94-09 100-164-602-5405 TAX 100-164-602-5405 CCPA TRAINING CONSORTZUN 001-150-999-5261 984.00 160.00 28.~.80 490.20 309.60 500.00 100.00 11.00 685.00 109.00 6/,.00 108.00 8.37 74.01 21,085.02 65 984.00 160.00 1,08~.60 600.00 11.00 685.00 109.00 64.00 116.37 74.01 20819 11/03/94 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA NOV. INSTALLMENT PAYMENT 320-2800 1,214.77 20819 11/03/94 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA NOV. INSTALLMENT PAYMENT 320-199-999-5391 212,80 7,57 V~ ~ CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 3 11. 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20820 20820 20820 20820 20820 20820 20820 20820 20821 20822 20823 20824 20824 20824 20824 20824 20826 20827 20827 20827 20828 20828 20828 20828 20829 20829 20829 20829 20829 20830 20830 20830 20830 20830 20830 20830 20830 20830 2C 2L CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN 000140 CANCER 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 000143 COPY-LINE CORPORATION 001233 DAN#S FEED & SEED, INC. ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2330 190-2330 001-2~30 100-2330 190-2330 191-2330 193-2330 280-2~30 REPAIR OF TCSD BASE STATION 190-180-999-5250 4/CASE MICOH TONER FOR COPIER 330-199-999-5220 BODT ALLOWANCE FOR R. WEST 100-164-601-5243 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AMIN 000156 DEHTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADV 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEHT-REV 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAH DONAHUE# ALYCE 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 000170 FPJtNKLIN QUEST COMPANY 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017'7 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL CORPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER BUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 000192 GLOBAL CORPUTER BUPPLIE 001-2~40 001-1180 001-2,~40 001-1180 001-~340 CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 100-164-604-52]0 5473 6664 0391 0164 - SM 547'5 6664 0391 0107 - HE 547'5 6664 0391 0107 - HE 001-100-999-5258 001-110-999-5258 001-150-999-5258 STORAGE BINDER AND SLIPCASE 001-140-999-5220 FREIGHT 001-140-999-5220 TAX 001-140-999-5220 REMAINING BALANCE-REFILL ORDER 001-120-999-5220 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES FY 94-95 001-140-999-5220 MIEC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 OFFICE BUPPLZES/BLDG & SAFETY 001-162-999-5220 ANYWHERE 1.0 FOR WINDONS DISK CALENDAR CREATOR PLUS 2.0 FAXME FAX CARTRIDGE FOR HP FREIGHT TAX SONY 120M 4NM DATA CARTRIDGE INKJET TRANSPARENCY FILM GLOSSY PAPER INKJET PAPER NON-GLOSSY FREIGHT TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 ITEM AMOUNT 39.75 39.75 193.66 12.94 8S.64 14.35 17.53 5.18 283.86 48.49 95.00 15.00 7.~ 7.~ 7.~- 7.~ 70.00 13.50 690.21 7.00 30.09 8.90 4.75 1.06 .39 6,87 47.21 54,17 17.66 166.40 129,95 39,95 179,85 9,43 27,60 22~,90 45,95 110,98 36,98 10,48 32,92 CHECK AMOUNT 406.80 283.86 48.49 95.00 30.68 70.00 13.50 ?27.30 15.10 292.31 8/<.7.99 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA r ' 4 11/03/94 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUM8ER NAME 20831 11/03/94 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OF 208~2 11/03/94 000364 GREEK, JUNE 208~3 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03194 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 208~3 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03194 000430 208]3 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 20833 11/03/94 000430 20834 11/03/94 20834 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 208~5 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20835 11/03/94 20836 11/03/94 20837 11/03/94 20838 11/03/94 20838 11/03/94 20839 11/03/94 20840 11/03/94 20840 11/03/94 20841 11/03/94 20842 11/03/94 20843 '11/03/94 20844 11/03/94 208/,5 11/03/94 208/+5 11/03/94 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VQLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VQLUNTA GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA GROUP AHERICA VOLUNTA 001641 HENNESSY, LENORA 0016/+1 HENNESSY, LENORA ITEH DESCRIPTION FINANCE OFFICER RECRUIT AD LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFER. REIMD 000430 VL ADVAN 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VL REVER 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000/,30 VOL LIFE 000/+30 VOL LIFE BROCHURE FOR HOLIDAY LIGHTS PHOTOGRAPHY FOR SISTER CITIES 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CO!4P 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COHP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 OEF COMP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP KING-CLIBY, KIRSTEN SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MATT ~IECHEC CERT. POOL OPER 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TOOLS FOR BASIN CLEANING 00112~ KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX LONAX, SEAN MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MAUR1CE PRINTERS, INC. 000220 000220 001007 000239 001619 001243 000246 000246 N P G CORP. OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER PALMQUIST, MARy OPENING ACT FOR PARADE 50 DINNER INVITATIONS/ENVEL TAX CITYWIDE ST PATCH WORK TEMP HELP t4/E 10-16-94 RECRUIT AD FOR MAIN ST DIRECTO PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PER REDE PERS (EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 PERS RET ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999'5254 001'120-999'5258 001'2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 192-2510 340-2510 001'2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 340-2510 190-183-999-5370 001-100-999-5258 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 192-2080 193-2080 280-2080 300-2080 340-2080 190-2900 190-180-999-5261 100-164-601-5242 100-164-601-5242 190-183-999-5370 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 100-164-601-5402 001-162-999-5118 001-150-999-5254 190-183-999-5330 001-2130 001-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 30.00 8.00 188.25 138.92 15.78 29.69 3.45 .41 207.75- 161.86 15.79 29,69 .41 82.00 141.29 1,474.12 248.62 510.10 74.52 75.00 91.09 29.98 37.49 22.50 100.00 65.00 80.20 6.22 90.00 ~,00 4.88 936.00 468.00 214.52 288.80 43.06 11,769.64 CHECK AMOUNT 30.00 8.00 376.50 22~. 29 2,563.42 100.00 65.00 86.42 90.00 67.88 936.00 468.00 214.52 28~.80 VG' CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 11, 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20845 20845 20~45 20845 20845 20~45 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20845 20~,,~ 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 Z0846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 20846 208z~6 20846 20846 20846 20846_ 20' ZO CHECK DATE 11103/94 11/03/94 11/03/9& 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 '1/03/94 1/03/94 VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT iTEM CHECK NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET (EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR ~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO ~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO ~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD ~EALTH iNSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA ~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH iNSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH ZNSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH XNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTRHET HEALTH XNSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH XNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 KAiSERSO HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PACiF[CR HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PAC[F[CR HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACiF[CR HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PC HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2390 100-Z390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 280-Z390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001'2090 I00-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 193-2090 300-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 190-2090 191-2090 193-2090 330-2090 340'2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001'Z090 100-2090 190-2090 192-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 2,262.72 108.84 2,719.67 87.47 99.78 316.46 61.17 106.84 268.21 121.11 301.05 53.78 10.78 .37 13.33 .42 .93 1.44 .19 .46 .93 .93 2.00 1,164.67 39.81 688.17 857.37 176.06 306.20 38.27 4,089.64 978.61 163.67 1,801.12 143.53 175,43 318.96 413.44 810.66 347.42 857.13 63.68 1,055.23 410.10 7"~3.20 160.79 521.82 1,620.60 10.37 3.11 18,351.58 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA ' 6 11/03/94 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS VOUCHER/ CHECX CHECX NUMBER DATE 20~6 11/03/94 208/,6 11/03/94 20B46 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 208/,6 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11103194 20846 11/03/94 208/,6 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20B46 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 208/,6 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 208/,6 11/03/94 20846 11/03/94 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PENS ~EALTH INBUR. PRE 000245 PERS ~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS :HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS 4EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS :HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INBUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH IMSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PENS HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR, PNE 000245 PENS HEALTH ]NSUR, PRE ITEM DESCRIPTION 000245 PERS DED 000245 PERS-ADM 000245 TAKECARE 000245 TAKECARE 000245 TAKECARE 000245 TArECARE 000245 AETNA SO 000245 8LSH[ELD 000245 NELTHNET 000245 NELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHMET 000245 HELTNNET 000245 KAISERSO 000245 KAISERSO 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PC 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS REV 000245 TAXECARE 000245 TAXECARE 000245 TAKECARE 208/,7 11/03/94 000248 PETROLANE FUEL EXPENSE 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 208~8 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS. 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 208~8 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB, 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 208~8 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS. 20848 11/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS, 208~9 11/03/94 000253 PQSTHASTER EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 20849 11/03/94 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 208/+9 11/03/94 000253 POSTRASTER EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 208/+9 11/03/94 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS HAIL SERVICE 20850 11/03/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN SUBSCRIPTION 11/94-2/95 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENT ADV 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 lp0-2090 280-2090 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 190-2090 3/,0-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 280-2090 001-162-~99-5263 190-181-999-5301 001-165-999-5250 100-164-604-5261 190-180-~99-5260 190-180-9~9-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-~-5258 001-150-999-5260 001-140-999-5260 100-164-601-5258 001-110-999-5260 001-161-999-5260 100-164-601-5260 100-16~,-604-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-120-~99-5230 001-110-999-5230 190-180-999-5228 001-1180 001-2340 100-2340 165-2340 ITEM AMOUNT 565.04 102.98 1,416.10 841.02 7~.97 40.76 101.31 52.02 184,44 3.80 2.19 16.97 1.22 46.99 8.29 12.41 7.96 112.19 31.92 616.72- 2~ ,45 6.74 4.82 240.25 59.36 11.82, 2~.02 25.00 4.31 28.20 17.51 9.00 30.00 8.51 21.87 6,95 15.00 2~.90 27.90 75.75 13.95 23.92 48.78 1,241.92 295.42 17.16 2L CHECK AHOUNT .93 240.25 260.57 139.50 23.92 VOU' CITY OF TEMECULA 11/ 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL pERIOOS PAGE 7 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 190-2340 197,69 20851 11/05/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM t91-2,',',',',',',',',X~0 7.32 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 192-2340 42.90 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 193-2340 8.94 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 280-2340 8.58 20851 11/03/94 001537 pRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPN 300-2340 10.72 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 OENTALPM 330-2340 42.90 20851 11/03/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 OENTALPM 340-Z340 49.35 20852 11/03/94 000546 RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 115.68 1,971.66 115.68 20853 11/03/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPROOUCTION 20853 11/03/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C COPIES OF BLUEPRINTS 210-165-641-5802 001-161-999-5224 157.10 35.02 192.12 20854 11/03/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 02-79-10100-19/1-10/4/94 190-180-999-5240 131.40 131.40 20855 11/03/94 RHOOES, DEBRA CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-183'4982 28.00 28.00 20856 11/03/94 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AL~)ITOR PRXING CITATION FOR OCT. 94 001-2260 20856 11/03/94 000353 RIVERSlOE CO. AUDITOR PRXING CITATION FOR OCT. 94 001-2265 220.00 50.00 270.00 2 11/03/94 001169 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF FILING FEES FOR NOTARY 001-120-999-5226 60.00 60.00 20858 11/03/94 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE SERVICES FOR JULY TO SEPT 94 001-172-999-5255 75.00 75.00 20859 11/03/94 000873 RQBERTS, RONALD H. PARKING FOR CONFERENCE 001-100-999-5258 12.00 12.00 20860 11/03/94 RUDTEN, BERNRD CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-18~-4982 ]6.00 36.00 20861 11/03/94 000Z77 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FIGURINES FOR HALLO~4EEN 190-180-999-5301 12.74 12.74 20862 11/03/94 000499 S C C C A ASSOCIATION MEETING 11/17/94 001-120-999-5258 50.00 50.00 20863 11/03/94 000704 S K S, iNC/INLAND OIL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 100-164-601-5263 20863 11/03/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 001-165-999-5263 20863 11/03/94 000704 s K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 001-163-999-5263 20863 11/03/94 000704 S X S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 190-180-999-5263 20863 11/03/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 001-110-999-5263 20863 11/03/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OiL FUEL EXPENSE 9/30-10/13/94 001-162-999-5263 358.90 53.23 109.63 130.29 45.47 24.77 722.29 2086~ 11/03/94 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE CLASSIFIED AD FOR EDC 001-150-999-5254 187.00 187.00 20865 11/03/94 SIDOTI, BELINDA CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 36.00 36.00 20866 11/03/94 000405 SMITH, PHILLIP MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL REIMBURSE 001-162'999'5226 180.00 180,00 20867 11/03/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 20867 11/03/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66-77-795-0002-01 9/21-10/20 66-77-795-8082-01 9/21-10/20 191-180-999-5319 190-181-999-5240 85.99 956.86 1,042.85 20F 1/03/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 00-00-700-9657-01 9/26-10/26 340-199-999-5240 2,928.82 20L 1/03/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 00-00-700-9659-01 9/26-10/26 193-180-999-5240 553.80 VQUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA ' '= 8 11/03/94 15:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 20868 11/03/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 00-00-700-9656-01 9/26-10/26 191-180-999-5240 20868 11/03/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 00-00-700-9656-01 9/26-10/26 191-180-999-5319 20868 11/03/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON - 00-00-700-9658-01 9/26-10/26 190-180-999-5240 208~9 11/03/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CUMP 17-8274-036-1451-19/22-10/21 190-181-999-5240 20870 11/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-5153 GY 001-150-999-5208 20871 11/03/94 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF, NUNXCXP YRLY MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 1995 190-180-999-5226 20872 11/03/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T NAINT FOR B & S VEHICLES 20872 11/03/94 000291 SPEE OEE OIL CHANGE & T MAINT FOR B & S VEHICLES 001-162-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 208?3 11/03/94 000293 STADIUM PIZZA UNITED MAY LUNCH 001-150-999-5265 20874 11/05/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 NAMEPLATE FOR M. MIECHEC 190-180-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 NAMEPLATE FOR K),TY LEE 001-163-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 NAMEPLATE FOR J. MEYER 001-t61-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 190-180-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 001-163-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 001-161-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 TAX 190-180-999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 TAX 001-163~999-5220 20874 11/03/94 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 TAX 001-161-999-5220 20875 11/03/94 TARGET BIKE SAFETY 001-2270 20876 11/03/94 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 384.95 3,690.82 4,092.38 18.43 99.02 105,00 20.89 31.76 200.00 21.60 21.60 61.20 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 1.66 4.77 503.93 55.99 2087'/ 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 476.37 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 100-2125 55.51 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 165-2125 7.40 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 85.10 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UM DUES 191-2125 8.32 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 28.68 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.62 20877 11/03/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 18.50 20878 11/03/94 000168 TEMECULA FLO~JER CORRAL SYMPATHY * MARKEY FAMILY 20878 11/03/94 000168 TEMECULA FLOtJER CORRAL SYMPATHY - COUCH FAMILY 001-100-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 20879 11/03/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TROPHIES FOR TEEN TOURNAMENT 190-182-999-5301 20880 11/03/94 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER LICENSE REIMB. FOR 11/9 CONFER 001o100-999-5258 20881 '11/03/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FEX BENEFIT REIMB. P/R 11/3/94 001-1020 20881 11/03/94 000642 TEMEOULA, CITY OF - FLE FEX BENEFIT REINS. P/R 11/3/94 190-1020 20881 11/03/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FEX BENEFIT REIMB. P/R 11/3/94 100-1020 20881 11/03/94 0006/,2 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FEX BENEFIT REIMB. P/R 11/3/94 300-1020 20881 11/03/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FEX BENEFIT REIMB. P/R 11/3/94 330-1020 57.65 60.34 19.40 25.00 3,394.41 297.98 30.25 12.50 11.11 CHECK AMOUNT 11,650.77 18.43 99.02 105.00 52.65 200.00 116.49 503.93 55.99 684.50 117.99 19.40 25.00 '6.25 VOUr, CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 11/ 15:40 VCXJCHER/CBECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20882 20882 20882 20883 20883 20883 20883 20883 20883 2088; 20884 2088z+ 20885 20885 20885 20885 208~, 2' 20887 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR [TEN DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 11/03194 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03~94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 000320 TOWHE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOI4NE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES COI4M SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA] 000389 PT RET[R 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RET[R 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OERA) 000389 PT RET[R 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY QF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 tJW 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO. UNIFORMS FOR PW UNIFORMS MAINT FOR PW ARCHITECT-KENT HINDERGARDT PX 20888 11/03/94 WELLS FARGO BIKE SAFETY WOLFF, MIKE XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ZIGLER, GAIL 20889 20890 20891 11/03/94 11/03/94 11/03/94 001318 000345 000348 ANNUAL BOOT ALLOWANCE XEROX COPIER MNTLY LEASE REFRESHMENTS - MEETING AT CRC ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-~99-5220 100-164-604-5220 100-164-604-5220 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-601-5243 100-164-601-5243 210-190-136-5802 001-2270 001-1990 330-199-999-5239 190-180-999-5260 ITEM AMCXJNT 171.00 79.54 17.72 2,448.88 188.45 271.50 5.00 312.50 50.00 299.86 132.92 421.26 63.85 10.05 17.00 .60 23.00 23.00 360.00 125.00 78.12 2,986.12 50.00 CHECK AMOUNT 268.26 3,276.33 854.04 91.50 46.00 360.00 125.00 78.12 2,986.12 50.00 TOTAL CHECKS 134,~7.76 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA n~F ~ 11/0~/94 16:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOtJ/MOD SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTR|CT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND ZSO CAPITAL PROJECTS ° TCSD 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORNATiON SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES TOTAL AHOUNT 342,393.72 14,948.15 4,560.85 32,445.75 474.97 17,381.26 171,273.05 7,869,88 15,178.80 3,960.24 2,255.15 1,986,05 614,727.87 V~ CITY OF TEMECULA 11/~ 16:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERI[X)S VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER N~J4E DESCRIPTION 20895 11/15/94 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. 224 BAGS OF ASPHALT Z0895 11/15/94 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. FREIGHT 20895 11/15/94 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. TAX 20896 11/15/94 001344 AHER[CAN CONTRACTING, I 20896 11/15/94 001344 AMERIC..AN COMTRACTING, 20896 11/15/94 001344 AMERICAN CONTRACTING, 20896 11/15/94 001344 AMERICAN CONTRACTING, I 20897 11/15/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20897 11/15/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20898 11/15/94 000123 BURKE WILLZAMS & SORENS 20898 11/15/94 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS 20890 11/15/94 0001~ BURKE WILLIAMS & SOREBS 20898 11/15/94 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS 20898 11/15/94 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS 20898 11/15/94 000123 BURKE ~ILLIAMS & SORENS 20890 11/15/94 00012] BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS SPORTS PARK SLOPE REPAIR PRK SLOPE REPAIRS/RIP PAP 10% RETENTIOM INV. 253-15 10% RETENTION INV 253-16 TEMPORARY HELP W/E 10/12/94 TEMPOP.~RY HELP W/E 10/12/94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 PROF SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT. 94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT. 94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT. 94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT. 94 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 20 '1/15/94 001178 G M S BUSXNESS FORMS, I 10,000 SELF MAILERS-BUSINESS 2L ,1/15/94 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I FREIGHT 2089Y 11/15/94 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I T~X 20900 11/15/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA 20900 11/15/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA 20900 11/15/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA 20900 tl/15/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA 20901 11/15/94 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED 20902 11/15/94 000979 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE 20903 11/15/94 001544 E L YEAGER CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE NL~INT FOR OCT AT CRC OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR MEDIAN OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR PARKS OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR SR CNT TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGP.~M FY94-95 VALLEJO CHANNEL REPAIRS ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 210-166-64B-5804 210-166-62.8-5804 210-2035 210-2035 001-140-999-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-130-qo9-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-1280 300-199-999-5207 190-180-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 190-182-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 100-164-602-5406 RELEASE OF RETENTION Pk93-12 210-2035 ITEM AMOUNT 1,556.80 50.00 120.65 4,994.00 3,565.20 499.40- 356.52- 516.00 722.40 3,150.00 5,051.58 12,895.10 1,102.85 1,508.04 1,401.00 2,618.19 1,369.00 47.12 95.83 1,619.00 474.97 12,471.36 175.00 3,385.00 2,375.00 4,385.51 PAGE I CHECK AMOUNT 1 , 727.45 7,703.28 1,238.40 27,726.76 1,511.95 14,740.33 3,385.00 2,375.00 4,385.51 20904 11/15/94 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC CONTRACT INSPECTOR 001-162-999-5250 4,874.39 20904 11/15/94 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC NO BACKUP FOR REIMB. 001-162-999-5250 155.39- 4,719.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA D~CE 2 11/03/94 16:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERi°DS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER Z0905 20905 20906 20906 20906 20906 20906 20906 20907 20907 20908 20908 20908 20908 20908 20908 20908 20909 20909 20910 20910 20910 20911 20911 20912 20913 20914 20914 20915 20915 20916 20916 20917 20917 20918 20918 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 11/15/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN 000481 GEOTECHN1CAL & ENVIRONM 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM 000~81 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRQNN 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 001013 HINDERLITER de LLAMAS A 001013 HINDERLITER de LLAMAS A ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR SPT PR 190-180-999-5415 SENIOR TECHNICIAN-SEPT 94 SEN. TECH &MAX DENSITY 9/94 FIELD DIR/SENIOR TECH 9/94 FIELD OIR/SENIOR TECH 9/94 TECHNICIAN II * 9/94 PROF. SERVICE FOR SEPT. 94 210-190-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 210-190-136-5804 CHECK SIGNATURE MACHINE TAX 001-140-999-5610 001-140-999-5610 MICROSOFT BUS MOUSE OEM NOTHERBORRD REPLACEMENT IDE HARD DRIVE 420 FREIGHT FREIGHT TAX TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5Z15 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 SALES TAX ANALYSIS FY 94-95 001-140-999-5248 SALES TAX FINDERS FEE FY 94-95 001-140-999-5248 17,381.26 6,877.81 47.00 217.50 509.50 298.00 164.50 654.50 1,780.00 137.95 315.00 285.00 380.00 4.82 10.18 24.41 51.54 900.00 208.48 001429 INACOH INFORMATION SYST SYNOPTICS EXPANSION CHASSIS 320-1970 1,096.00 001429 INACOH INFORMATION SYST FREIGHT 520-1970 8.74 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST TAX 320-1970 79.46 000202 J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES 000202 J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES 001349 KANE, BALLMER & BERI(HAN 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER DESIGN SERVICES FOR RANCHO CAL 210-190-137-5802 AMENDMENT #2 DESIGN SPT PRK 210-190-137-5802 PROF. SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 280-199-999-5246 REPAIR OF TCSD TRUCK 300-199-999-5207 ADULT VOLLEYSALL OFFICIALS 190-183-999-5380 ADULT SOFTBALL GAME OFFICIALS 190-183-999-5380 CONTRACT-LONA LINDA PARK PH II 210-190-134-5804 RETENTION ON INV.#3 SEPT94 210-2035 PALA PARK GENERAL CONTRACTOR 210-190-120-5804 RETENTION FOR INV. 2924 210-2035 RESTORATION OF MARGARITA CHANN 100-164-601-5401 GRADING TO DIRT ACCESS SPT PRK 190-180-999-5212 SURVEYING SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 210-199-128-5802 SURVEY & PHOTOGRANNETRY 210-190-626-5802 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS 001501 MARINA CONTRACTORS, INC 001501 MARINA CONTRACTORS, INC 001207 MARTIN J. JASKA, INC. 001207 MARTIN J. JASKA, INC. 00088] MONTELEQNE EXCAVATING 000883 MONTELEQNE EXCAVATING 000231 N B S/LOWRY, INC. 000231 N B S/LOWRY, INC. 2,384.14 5,500.00 5,928.75 2,452.20 596.00 2,475.00 23,727.71 2,572.77' 90,448.00 9,044.80- 1,500.00 3,500.00 3,006.98 4,750.00 CHECK AMOUNT 24,259.07 1,891.00 1,917.95 1,070.95 48 1,184.20 7,884.14 5,928.75 2,452.20 2,871.00 21,354.94 81,403.20 S,O00.O0 7,756.98 20919 11/15/94 001007 H P G CQRP. DEL REY RD REPAIRS 100-164-601-5402 4,385.70 VOU' CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 11/ 16:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20919 20920 20920 20921 20921 20922 20923 20924 Z0924 20925 20925 20925 20925 20925 2 2b 20925 20925 20925 20925 20926 20926 20927 20927 20927 20927 20928 20928 20928 20929 20930 20930 20931 20931 20931 20931 20 CHECX VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/15/94 001007 N P G CORP. 11/15/94 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES 11/15/94 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES 11/15/94 001385 PRICE WATERHOUSE 11/15/94 001385 PRICE WATERHOUSE 11/15/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 11/15/94 001046 REXON, FREED~N, KLEPET 11/15/94 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE 11/15/94 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF#S 11/15/94 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS 11115/94 000955 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B 11/15/94 000955 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B 11/15/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 11/15/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 11/15/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 11/15/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 11/15/94 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WN FROST & 11/15/94 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~N FROST & 11/15/94 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WN FROST & 11/15/94 000929 T B PENICK & SONS, INC. 11/15/94 001478 THOMAS OLSEN ASSOCIATES 11/15/94 001478 THOMAS OLSEN ASSOCIATES 11/15/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 11/15/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 11/15/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 11/15/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 1/15/94 000539 WIMMER YAMADA ASSOCIATE ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT REPAIRS BTWN YNEZ & VIA SERRIT CONTI~j~CT SERVICES SEPT 94 CONTRACT SERVICES SEPT 94 100-164-601-5401 280-199-999-5248 165-199-~99-5248 CONSULT. TO ANALYZE FEASIBILTI 280-199-999-5248 CONSULT. TO ANALYZE FEASIBILTI 280-1270 2-2"' WATER METERS AT PALA CONM 210-190-120'5804 PROF SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 001-130-~99-5247 SEPT 1994 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-172'~99-5255 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE FOR AUG 001-172-~99'5255 ACIZS 2QTR SYSTEM CHARGE PRK MANOR-SEARCH WARRANTS LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 LAW ENFORCE FOR SEPT 94 001-170-999-5325 001-170-~99-5281 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5298 001-170-~99-5290 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 001-1230 BIKE PATROL FOR AUGUST 94 BIKE PATROL FOR SEPT 94 001-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 REGULAR COPIER/LASER PAPER COLORED COPIER PAPER REGULAR 8 1/2 X 14 LEGAL SIZE TAX 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5Z20 PROF SERVICE FOR AUG 94 WALCOTT CORRIDOR CONTRACT DELETE ADVANCE FEES FROM INVOI 210-165-637-5802 210-165-637-5802 210-165-637-5802 STOP NOTICE RELEASE-MISSION PO 250-2038 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES STUDY PH1 210-165-637-5802 NOT PAYING FOR DIRECT EXPENSES 210-165-637-5802 PORTABLE ALUM BLEACHERS 5 ROWS SET UP/LABOR FREIGHT TAX 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 PROF SERVICES FOR SEPT 94 210-190-120-5802 1,575.00 4,560.86 4,560.85 1,035.50 1,035.50 13,972.00 1,424.00 6,040.89 7,055.37 9,038.03 1,694.11 185,479.52 19,788.00 5,793.84 5,199.60 2,798.32 15,397.07 8,406.8~ 14,284.97 14,951.63 5,199.60 5,050.80 2,818.20 1,173.00 592.20 78.00 142.85 15,536.00 6,030.00 3,000.00' 7,869.88 3,336.20 116.20- 1,650.00 800.00 230.30 127.88 3,136.00 5,960.70 9,121.71 2,071.00 13,972.00 I, 424. O0 13,096.26 288,031.55 7,869.00 1,986,05 18,566.00 7, 8~9.88 3,220.00 2,808.18 3,136.00 TOTAL CHECKS 614~727.87 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, interim Finance Officer November 15, 1994 City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1994 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Interim Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1994. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are recluired by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of September 30, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1994 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of September 30, 1994 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of September 30, 1994 Cash Activity for the Month of September: Cash and Investments as of September 1, 19~}4 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and investments as of September 30, 1994 $ 46,625,856 2,043,872 (2,191,667) $ 46,478,061 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution Yield Balance City Hall $ 800 First Interstate (202,574) First interstate 6,264 State Treasurer 5.106% 32,898,896 ICMA 234,501 PEBSCO 264,303 PEBSCO 23,331 Bank of America 4.500% 829,829 Bank of America 4.500% 12,422,711 $ 46,478,061 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is nat of outatan~:ling checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of September 30, 19~. City Total Assets $ 29,984,628 Less: Liabilities 3,860,801 Total Fund Balances 26,123,827 Less: Reserved Amounts (1) 4,061,001 Less: Designated Amounts (2) 14,066,696 Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ 7,996,130 Community Services Redevelopmerit District Agency Total $ 2,281,720 $ 20,818,323 $ 53,084,671 222,829 467,053 4,550,683 2,058,891 20,351.270 48,533,988 935,568 8,289.331 13,285,900 1,123,323 12,061,939 27,251,958 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,996,130 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing, and debt service. (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 APPROVAiy~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk November 15, 1994 Review of City Conflict of Interest Code RECOMMENDATION: 1. Review amendments to the City's Conflict of Interest Code. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE 3. Direct the City Clerk to file the amended Conflict of Interest Code with the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 87306.5 requires that each even numbered year, the code reviewing body (FPPC) shall direct each local agency which has adopted a Conflict of Interest Code to review its Code and, if a change in its code is necessitated by changed circumstances, submit an amended Conflict of Interest Code to the code reviewing body. The City Attorney has reviewed the City's code and feels the changes indicated in the double underlined version of the Code which is attached are necessary. Also the addition of several positions are recommended in Exhibit "A" Desianated City of Temecula Emolovees and Disclosure Cateaories. ATTACHMENTS: City of Temecula Conflict of Interest Code (for approval) City of Temecula Conflict of Interest Code (Underline Version) RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF TitF. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN AMF~NDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has previously adopted a Conflict of Interest Code to apply to certain officers and employees of the City; and WFW-REAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula desires to adopt an Amended Conflict of Interest Code; NOW THEREFORE, THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, D~,TP_,RMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Amended Conffict of Interest Code, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted as the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Temecula. Section 2. The previously adopted Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Temecula is of no further force and effect. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 15th day of November, 1994. A'rrhST: Ron Robere, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 43 1 CONFLICT OF INTEIIFsT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SECTION 1. Pumose. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Sections 87300, et sea., the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "City") hereby adopts the following Conffict of Interest Code. The provisions of this Code are in addition to those contained in Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Government Code (Section 87100 et ~¢q.). Except as otherwise indicated, the definitions contained in Ti~e 9, Chapter 2 of the Government Code (Section 8200 et seq.) are incorporated herein and apply to this Code. It is the purpose of this Code to provide for the disclosure of assets and income of designated employees which may be materially affected by their official actions, and, in appropriate circumstances, to provide that designated employees should be disqualified from acting in order that conflicts of interest may be avoided. SECTION 2. Designated Positions. The positions listed in Exhibit "A" axe designated positions. Officers and employees holding those positions are designated employees and axe deemed to make or paxticiI~ate in the making of decisions which may foreseably have a material effect on a financial interest. SECTION 3. Disclosure Statements. Designated positions shall be assigned to one or more of the disclosure categories set forth in Exhibit "B" . Each designated employee or official shall file an annual statement disclosing that employee's or of~cial's interest in investments, business positions, interests in real property and source of income designated as reportable under the category to which the employee's or official's position is assigned in Exhibit "B" . SECTION 4. Place and Time of Filing. A. All designated employees or officials required to submit a statement of financial interests, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall file the original with the City Clerk's office. B. The City Clerk's office shall make and retain a copy of the statement. C. A designated employee or official required to submit an initial statement of financial interest, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall submit the statement within 30 days after the effective date of this Code, disclosing interests held including investments, business positions, and interests in real property on the effective date of this Code, and income received during the twelve (12) months prior to the effective date of this Code. D. All persons appointed, promoted, or transferred to designated positions shall file initial statements not more than 30 days after assuming office. E. The first statement of f'mancial interests fled by a designated employee shall disclose the designated employee's reportable investments, business positions, and interests in real property as those investments, positions, and interests in real property exist as of the effective date of this Code or the date the designated employee assumed offtee, whichever is later, and income received during the preceding twelve (12) months. F. Annual statements shall be filed by April 1, of each year by all designated employees. Such statements shall disclose reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or rec(tved at any time during the previous calendar year or since the designated employee took office if during the calendar yea~. G. A designated employee required to file a statement of financial interest with any other agency which is within the same territorial jurisdiction and whose disclosure requirements are comparable may comply with the provisions of this Code by filing a duplicate copy of the statement filed with the other agency, in lieu of an entirely separate statement. H. Every designated employee who leaves office shall f~e, within 30 days of leaving office, a statement disclosing reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or received at any time during the period between the closing date of the last statement requi£ed to be fled and the date of leaving office. I. A designated employee who resigns his or her position within 30 days twelve (12) months following initial appointment or within thirty (30) days of the date of a notice mailed by the filing officer of the individual's filing obligation, whichever is earlier, is not deemed to assume or leave office, provided that during the period between appointment and resignation the individual does not make, participate in making, or use the position to influence any decision of the City or tee(lye or become entitled to receive any form of payment by virtue. of being appointed to the position. Within thirty (30) days of the date of a notice mailed by the filing officer, the individual shall do both of the following: 1. File a written resignation with the appointing power. 2. File a written statement with the ffiing officer on a form prescribed by the commission and signed under penalty of perjury stating that the individual, during the period between appointment and resignation, did not make, participate in the making or use the position to influence any decision of the agency or receive, or become entitled to receive, any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. SECTION 5. Contents of Disclosure Statements. Disclosure statements shall be made on forms supplied'by the City Clerk's Office, (FPPC Form No. 730), and shall contain the following information: A. Contents of Investment and Real Properly Reports. When an investment or an interest in real property is required to be disclosed, the statement shall contain: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; LAX:Z:t~Z2,44.4 2 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement indicating whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds one thousand dollars ($1,000) but does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whether it exceeds ten thousand ($10,000) but does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or whether it exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). For purposes of this Cede, "interest in real property" does not include the principle residence of the designated employee or any other property which the designated employee utilizes exclusively as the employee's personal residence. 5. For purposes of this subdivision (a) of Section 5, "interest in real property" does not include the principal residence of the fLIer or any other property which utilizes exclusively as the personal residence of the flier. B. Contents of Personal Income Reports: When personal incomez is required to be disclosed under this Cede or pursuant to the Political Reform Act, the statement shall Contain: 1. The name and address of each source of income aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value, or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; 2. A statement indicating whether the aggregated value of income from each source, or, in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was at least two hundred fifty dollars ($250) but did not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), whether it was in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) but not greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or whether it was greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value and the date on which the gift was received; "Income" is defined in Title 9, Chapter 2 of the Government Cede (section 82030). That definition is attached hereto as Exhibit "C." any, given for the loan. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security. if C. Contents of Business Entity Reports. When the designated employee's pro rata share of income to a business entity, including income to a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported, the statement shall contain: 1. The name, address, and a general description of the business activity of the business entity; 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the designated employee's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) during a calendar year; 3. Income of a business entity is required to be reported only if the direct, indirect, or beneficial interest of the designated employee and his or her spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition, for purposes of subparagraphs 2 and 3 of this subsection, the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is reqfired only if it is reasonably foreseeable that the client or customer may be materially affected by the decisions of the designated employee. 4. When a payment, including an advance or reimbursement for travel is required to be reported pursuant to (b) and (c) of this Section 5, it may be reported on a separate travel reimbursement schedule which shall be included in the ftler's statement of economic interest. A flier who chooses not to use the travel schedule shall disclose payments for travel as a gift, unless it is clear from all surrounding circumstances that the services provided were equal to or greater in value than the payments for the travel, in which case the travel may be reported as income. D. Contents of Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, the designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or in which he or she holds any position of management; a description of the business entity in which the business is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. E. Acquisition or Disposal During a Calendar Year. If any otherwise reportable investment or interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. SECTION 6. Disqualification. Designated employees shall disqualify themselves from making, participating in the making of, or in any way using their official position to influence a governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial affect distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the designated LAX2:I09244.4 4 employee, or a member of his or her immediate family, or on: A. Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; B. Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; C. Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time when the decision is made; D. Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or E. Any .donor of, or any intermediary of agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time when the decision is made. For purposes of this section, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf of a designated employee, or by a business entity or trust in which the designated employee, the designated employee's agent, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a ten percent (10%) interest or greater. No designated employee shall be required to disqualify himself or herself with respect to any matter which could not legally be acted upon or decided without his or her participation. A designated employee required to disqualify himself or herself shall notify the City Manager and the City Clerk in writing, and the City Clerk shall record the person's disqualification. Violations. Pursuant to Government Code Section 87300, this Code "shall have the force of law" and any violation of any provision of this Code shall be punishable in accordance with Government Code Section 91000 to 91015 and include criminal and civil sanctions, as well as discipline within the City's Personnel System. L a44.4 5 SECTION 7. EXItIBIT "A" Designated City of Temecula Employees and Disclosure Categories The following positions entail the making or participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests: Designated Position Disclosure Categories Assistant City Manager ......................................... 1 Building Official ............................................. 1 Chief of Police .............................................. 1 ' Chief Accountant ............................................ 1 City Clerk ................................................. 1 City Engineer/Director of Public Works ............................... 1 Consultantt/ ................................................ 1 Principal Engineer ............................................ 1 Exempt Officials-~/ ............................................ 0 Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose all of the information required to be disclosed by designated employees subject to the following limitation: The City Manager or his or her designee may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirement described in this Section. Such written disclosure shall include a description and based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. The Mayor, City Council, Members of the Planning Commission, City Manager, City Attorney, City Treasurer, and Director of Finance are all required to file disclosure statements pursuant to state law and thus are not included herein. Director of Community Services ................................... 1 Financial Services Administator .................................... 1 Fire Chief ................................................. 1 Maintenance Superintendent ...................................... 1 1 Planning Director ............................................ Recreation Superintendent ....................................... 1 Senior Accountant ............................................ 1 Senior Building Inspector ........................................ 1 Senior Management Analyst ...................................... 1 Traffic Engineer ............................................. 1 Senior Planner .............................................. 1 Members of all City Commissions, Boards, and Committees Not Otherwise Required to File Conflict of Interest Statements ..................................... 1 SECTION 8. EXHIBIT "B" Categories of Reportable Economic Interests Designated Persons in Category "1" Must Report: All investments, interests in real property, income, and any business entity in which the person is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. These financial interests are reportable only if located within and subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or if the business entity is doing business or planning to do business in an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or has done business within an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement. Designated Persons in Category "2" Must Report: A. All Investments in real property located within or subject to the jurisdiction of the City. B. Investments in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. C. Income from any source which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. D. His or Her status as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holder of a position of management in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. Designated persons in Category "3" must report: A. Investments and business positions in, and income from business entities located in, doing business in, or planning to do business in the redevelopmerit project area and all interests in real property located within two miles of the redevelopment project area. EXHIBIT "C" 82030. Income. A. "Income" means, except as provided in subdivision Co), a payment received, including but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, dividend, interest, rent, proceeds from any sale, gift, including any gift of food or beverage, loan, forgiveness or payment of indebtedness received by the flier, reimbursement for expenses, per diem, or contribution to an insurance or pension program paid by any person other than an employer, and including any community property interest in the income of a spouse. Income also includes an outstanding loan. Income of an individual also includes a pro rata share of any income of any business entity or trust in which the individual or spouse owns, directly, indirecfly or beneficially, a 10-percem interest or greater. "Income" other than a gift, does not include income received from any source outside the jurisdiction and not doing business within the jurisdiction, not planning to do business within the jurisdiction, or not having done business within the jurisdiction during the two years prior to the rime any statement or other action is required under this rifle. B. "Income" also does not include: 1. Campaign contributions required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commending with Section 84100). 2. Salary and reimbursement for expenses or per diem received from a state, local, or federal government agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem received from a bona fide educational, academic, or charitable organization. 3. Any devise or inheritance. 4. Interest, dividends, or premiums on a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, shares in a credit union or any insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or any bond or other debt instrument issued by any government or government agency. 5. Dividends, interest, or any other return on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or a commodity future registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government, except proceeds from the sale of these securities and commodities futures. 6. Redemption of a mutual fund. 7. Alimony or child support payments. 8. Any loan or loans from a commercial lending institution which are made in the lenders' regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status if: L .a44.4 9 A. Used to purchase, retinarice the purchase of, or for improvements to, the principal residence of ~ler; or B. The balance owed does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 9. Any loan from an individuars spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, uncle, aunt, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that a loan from any such person shall be considered income if the lender is acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not covered by this paragraph. 10. Any indebmess created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction if made in the lenders regular course of business on tens available to members of the public without regard to official status, so long as the balance owed to the creditor does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 11. Payments received under a defined benefit pension plan qualified under Internal Revenue Cede Section 401(a). 12. Proceeds from the sale of securities registered with the securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or from the sale of commodities futures registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government if the ffier sells the securities or the commodities futures on a stock or commodities exchange and does no know or have reason to know the identity of the purchaser. L~a:i0~U.4 10 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SECTION 1. PurPose. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Sections 87300, et s~., the City of Temecula Oaereinafter referred to as "City") hereby adopts the following Conflict of Interest Code. The provisions of this Code are in addition to those contained in Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Government Code (Section 87100 et se~.). Except as otherwise indicated, the definitions contained in Title 9, Chapter 2 of the Government Code (Section 8200 et s__~.) are incorporated herein and apply to this Code. It is the purpose of this Code to provide for the disclosure of assets and income of designated employees winch may be materially affected by their official actions, and, in appropriate circumstances, to provide that designated employees should be disqualified from acting in order that conflicts of interest may be avoided. SECTION 2. Designated Positions. The positions listed in Exhibit "A" are designated positions. Officers and employees holding those positions are designated employees and are deemed to make or participate in the making of decisions winch may foreseably have a material effect on a financial interest. SECTION 3. Disclosure Statements. Designated positions shall be assigned to one or more of the disclosure categories set forth in Exhibit "B" . Each designated employee or official shall file an annual statement disclosing that employee's or of~cial's interest in investments, business positions, interests in real property and source of income designated as reportable under the category to winch the employee's or of~cial's position is assigned in Exhibit "B" . SECTION 4. Place and Time of Filing. A. All designated employees or officials required to submit a statement of financial interests, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall file the original with the City Clerk's office. B. The City Clerk's office shall make and retain a copy of the statement. C. A designated employee or official required to submit an initial statement of financial interest, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall submit the statement within 30 days after the effective date of this Code, disclosing interests held including investments, business positions, and interests in real property on the effective date of this Code, and income received during the twelve (12) months prior to the effective date of this Code. D. All persons appointed, promoted, or transferred to designated positions shall file initial statements not more than 30 days after assuming office. E. The first statement of financial interests fried by a designated employee shall disclose the designated employee's reportable investments, business positions, and interests in real property as those investments, positions, and interests in real property exist as of the effective date of this Code or the date the designated employee assumed office, whichever is later, and income received during the preceding twelve (12) months. F. Annual statements shall be Fried by April 1, of each year by all designated employees. Such statements shall disclose reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or received at any time during the previous calendar year or since the designated employee took office if during the calendar year. G. A designated employee required to file a statement of financial interest with any other agency which is within the same territorial jurisdiction and whose disclosure requirements are comparable may comply with the provisions of this Code by filing a duplicate copy of the statement fried with the other agency, in lien of an entirely separate statement. H. Every designated employee who leaves office shall fie, within 30 days of leaving office, a statement disclosing reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or received at any time during the period between the closing date of the last statement required to be filed and the date of leaving office. I. A designated employee who resigns his or her position within ~ii~i twelve (12) months following initial appointment or within thirty (30) days of the date of a notice mailed by the filing officer of the individual's filing oblination. whichever is earlier, is not deemed to assume or leave office, provided that during the period between appointment and resignation the individual does not make, participate in making, or use the position to influence any decision of the City or receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. Within thirty (30/days of the date of a notice mailed bv the illinn officer. the individual shall do both of the followinn: File a written resinnation with the avvointinn vower. 2. File a written statement with the ~tint officer on a form orescribed by the commission and signed under venaltv of ve~urv stating, that the individual. during, the veriod between anyointment and resin,nation. did not make. varticivate in the makinn or use the vosition to influence any decision of the anencv or receive. or become entitled to receive. any form of oavment bv virtue of being, avvointed to the vosition. SECTION 5. Contents of Disclosure Statements. Disclosure statements shall be made on forms supplied by the City Clerk's Office, (FPPC Form No. 730), and shall contain the following information: A. Contents of Investment and Real Property Reports. When an investment or an interest in real property is required to be disclosed, the statement shall contain: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; LAX2:I09244.3 2 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement indicatin~ whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds one thousand dollars ($1,000) but does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whether it exceeds ten thousand ($10,000) but does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or whether it exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($1013,000). For purposes of this Cede, "interest in real property" does not include the principle residence of the designated employee or any other property which the designated employee utilizes exclusively as the employee's personal residence. 5. For ournoses of this subdivision (a) of Section 5. 'interest in real vronertv" does not include the orincival residence of the filet or any other vronertv which utilizes exclusively as the nersonal residence of the filer. B. Contents of Personal Income R~ons: When personal incomex is required to be disclosed under this Cede or pursuant to the Political Reform Act, the statement shall Contaill: 1. The name and address of each source of income aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value, or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; 2. A statement indicating whether the aggregated value of income from each source, or, in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was at least two hundred fifty dollars ($250) but did not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), whether it was in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) but not greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or whether it was greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); A description of the consideration, ff any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value and the date on which the gift was received; "Income" is defined in Title 9. Chaoter 2 of the Government Code (section 82030L That definition is attached hemto as Exhibit "C.' any, given for the loan. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if C. Contents of Business Entity Reports. When the designated employec's pro rata share of income to a business entity, including income to a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported, the statement shall contain: 1. The name, address, and a general description of the business activity of the business entity; 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the designated employee's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,1300) during a calendar year; 3. Income of a business entity is required to be reported only if the direct, indirect, or beneficial interest of the designated employee and his or her spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition, for purposes of subparagraphs 2 and 3 of this subsection, the disclosure of porsons who are clients or customers of a business entity is requ'tred only if it is reasonably foreseeable that the client or customer may be materially affected by the decisions of the designated employee. 4. When a oavment. includin~ an advance or reimbursement for travel is recuired to be rex~orted pursuant to Co/and (c) of this Section 5, it may be re~oned on a separate travel reimbursement schedule which shall be included in the ~ler's statement of economic interest. A flier who chooses not to use the travel schedule shall disclose payments for travel as a Lift. unless it is clear from all surroundin~ circumstances that the services Drovided were eoual to or ~reater in value than the payments for the travel. in which case the travel may be reoorted as income. D. Contents of Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, the designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or in which he or she holds any position of management; a description of the business entity in which the business is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. E. Acquisition or DiSposal During a Calendar Year. If any otherwise reportable investment or interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. SECTION 6. Disqualification. Designated employees shall disqualify themselves from making, participating in the making of, or in any way using their of~c'ml position to influence a governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial affect distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the designated LAX2:1092443 4 employee, or a member of his or her immediate family, or on: A. Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,0{30) or more; B. Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; C. Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time when the decision is made; D. Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, parmet, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or E. Any donor of, or any intermediary of agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value pwvided to, received by, or promised to the designated employee within twelve (12) months prior to the time when the decision is made. For purposes of this section, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf of a designated employee, or by a business entity or trust in which the designated employee, the designated employee's agent, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirec~y, or beneficially a ten Percent (10%) interest or greater. No designated employee shall be required to disqualify himserf or herself with respect to any matter which could not legally be acted upon or decided without his or her participation. A designated employee required to disqualify himself or herself shall notify the City Manager and the City Clerk in writing, and the City Clerk shall record the person's disqualification. Violations. Pursuant to Government Code Section 87300, this Code "shall have the force of law" and any violation of any provision of this Code shall be punishable in accordance with Government Code Section 91000 to 91015 and include criminal and civil sanctions, as well as discipline within the' City's Personnel System. SECTION 7. EXIHRIT ~An Designated City of Temecula Employees and Disclosure Categories The following positions entail the making or participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests: Designated Position Disclosure Categories Assistant City Manager ......................................... 1 Building Official ............................................. 1 Chief of Police .............................................. 1 Chief Accountant ............................................ 1 City Clerk ................................................. 1 City Engineer/Director of Public Works ............................... 1 Consultant-~ ................................................ 1 Princioal Engineer ............................................ 1 Exempt Officials!/ ............................................ 0 Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose all of the information required to be disclosed by designated employees subject to the following limitation: The City Manager or his or. her designee may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirement described in this Section. Such written disclosure shall include a description and based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. The Mayor, City Council, Members of the Planning Commission, City Manager, City Attorney, City Treasurer, and Director of Finance are all required to fie disclosure statements pursuant to state law and thus are not included herein. LAX2:109244.4 6 Director of Community Services ................................... Financial Services Administator .................................... Fire Chief ................................................. Maintenance Su~rintendent ...................................... Planning Director ............................................ Recreation Sux~erintendent ....................................... Senior Accountant ............................................ Senior Building Inspector ........................................ Senior Management Analyst ...................................... Traffic Engineer ............................................. Senior Planner .............................................. Members of all City Commissions, Boards, and Committees Not Otherwise Required to File Conflict of Interest Statements ..................................... SECTION 8. EXHIBIT "B" Categories of Reportable Economic Interests Designated Persons in Category "1" Must Report: All investments, interests in real property, income, and any business entity in which the person is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. These financial interests are reportable only if located within and subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or if the business entity is doing business or planning to do business in an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or has done business within an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement. Designated Persons in Category "2" Must Report: A. All Investments in real property located within or subject to the jurisdiction of the City. B. Investments in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. C. Income from any source which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. D. His or Her status as a director, officer, pamer, mastee, employee, or holder of a position of management in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. Designated persons in Category "3" must report: A. Investments and business positions in, and income from business entities located in, doing business in, or planning to do business in the re, development project area and all interests in real property located within two miles of the redevelopment project area. LAX2:109244.3 8 EXHIBIT "C" 82030. Income. A. "Income" means, except as provided in subdivision Co), a payment received, including but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, dividend, interest, rent, proceeds from any sale, gift, including any gift of food or beverage, loan, forgiveness or payment of indebtedness received by the flier, reimbursement for expenses, per diem, or contribution to an insurance or pension program paid by any person other than an employer, and including any community property interest in the income of a spouse. Income also includes an outstanding loan. Income of an individual also includes a pro rata share of any income of any business entity or trust in which the individual or spouse owns, directly, indirectly or beneficially, a 10-percent interest or greater. "Income" other than a gift, does not include income received from any source outside the jurisdiction and not doing business within the jurisdiction, not planning to do business within the jurisdiction, or not having done business within the jurisdiction during the two years prior to the time any statement or other action is required under this title. B. "Income" also does not include: 1. Campaign contributions required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commending with Section 84100). 2. Salary and reimbursement for expenses or per diem received from a state, local, or federal govemment agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem received from a bona fide educational, academic, or charitable organization. 3. Any devise or inheritance. 4. Interest, dividends, or premiums on a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, shares in a credit union or any insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or any bond or other debt instrument issued by any government or government agency. 5. Dividends, interest, or any other return on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or a commodity future registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government, except proceeds from the sale of these securities and commodities futures. 6. Redemption of a mutual fund. 7. Alimony or child support payments. 8. Any loan or loans from a commercial lending institution which are made in the lenders' regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status if: A. Used to purchase, reflnance the purchase of, or for improvements to, the principal residence of flier; or B. The balance owed does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 9. Any loan from an individual's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, uncle, aunt, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that a loan from any such person shall be considered income if the lender is acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not covered by this paragraph. 10. Any indebtness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction if made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status, so long as the balance owed to the creditor does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 11. Payments received under a defined benefit pension plan qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a). 12. Proceeds from the sale of securities registered with the securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or from the sale of commodities futures registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government if the tier sells the securities or the commodities futures on a stock or commodities exchange and does no know or have reason to know the identity of the purchaser. L~X2:X0~44.S 10 ITEM 6 CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Substitute Subdivision ImprovementAgreement and Public improvement Bonds in Tract No. 21067 PREPARED BY: ;~/ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 21067, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On September 18, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 21067, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Kingsway Construction Corporation 2650 Camino Del Rio North San Diego, CA 92108 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by Insurance Company of the West as follows: Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $1,571,500 ($1,255,500, $149,500, and $166,500, respectively) to cover faithful performance for street, water and sewer improvements, Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $785,750 ($628,000, $75,000, and $82,750, respectively) to cover labor and materials for street, water and sewer improvements. 3. Bond No. 117 85 66 in the amount of $31,284to cover subdivision monumentation. r:\agdz~t\94\l I 15\tr210~7/ajp Kingsway Construction Corporation subsequently lost control of the site, The new developer for the subdivision is: Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc., General Partner) One Columbia Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 and they have submitted replacement agreements and securities for the contractual work. Replacement surety bonds have been posted by the same surety, Insurance Company of the West, under the same bond numbers and in the same amounts as the original documents. The contractual eighteen (18) month period for completion of the work under the original agreement expired March 18, 1993. It is Staff's recommendation that the new developer, Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc.) be granted an eighteen (18) month construction completion period as set forth in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Section 20-"Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions). The contractual completion date would become April 11, 1996. The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Trotsdale Drive, Canterfield Drive, Rein Court, Muirfield Drive, and portions of Jedediah Smith Road and Temecula Lane. Attachment: Location Map Substitute Public Improvement Bonds (on file) Substitute Agreement (on file) r:~agdrptXt)4\l 115Xtr21067/ajp VICINITY MAP flo ~CAL~ TRACT NO. 21067 Location Map ITEM 7 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Contract Amendment No. 8 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnoto, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 8 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the I-15/Rancho California Road interchange modification in an amount not to exceed $107,000.00. BACKGROUND: The additional costs detailed in the following section for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modification were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans. The following items of work will be performed as a result of a change in the alignment of the north bound on and off-ramps and other items of work. The following are the various items necessary to complete the engineering plans and specification for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modifications. iTEM 1: Caltrans Changes The plans, as base on the approved prior submittals, are approximately 85% complete. The same changes requested for Winchester Road are also being required on Rancho California Road by Caltrans. The changes are primarily to the acceleration lane geometrics and the onramp loop radii. The re-design will cause a severe impact to the adjacent parking and service areas of the existing motel, The amount of the change order necessary is approximately $28,500.00 Subtotal: $28,500.00 -1- r:~agdrpt~94\l 115\CFD88-12.AdS/~jp ITEM 2: Scope Expansion The base contract provided for 56 sheets at a fee of (;296,585. JFD's projection at this time is that the actual sheet count will be a minimum of 97 sheets at time of completion. A straight-line interpolation of the revised contract amount is $513,728, a difference of $217,143. JFD agrees to absorb a portion of this expense; however, based on recent experience JFD is requesting an increase of ~55,000. Subtotal: $55,000.00 ITEM 3: Rancho California Water District Waterline Relocation The design of improvement Plans for the relocation of approximately 1,250 lineal feet of existing 20" Rancho California Water District (RCWD) water main within an existing easement. The water main is in conflict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp locations. This work will be designed on separate plans to RCWD standards, and for the review of District plan checkers. Will require minimal field survey. Will require the preparation and processing of easement documents. Subtotal: $12,000.00 ITEM 4: Embassy Suites Parking Configuration Due to the modification to the north bound off-ramp, a portion of the existing parking must be re-configured. The estimate to include the parking lot modification into the Caltrans plan set will require: 1 - layout sheet 1 - proposed construction sheet 1 - existing landscaping sheet 1 - proposed landscaping sheet 1 - detail sheet additional special provisions and standards covering the non Caltrans work Subtotal: $11,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT: $107,000.00 FISCAL IMPACT: All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $551,950 B. A portion of Amendment No. 4 (Approved 9/14/93) 3,330 C. A portion of Amendment No. 7 (Approved 5/10/94) 4,500 D. Proposed Amendment No. 8 107,000 Total: $666,780 Funds are available from Account No. 600-165-999-6201. Attachment: Amendment No. 8, J.F. Davidson Associates -3- r:~a~gdt~t\94\l 115\CFD88-12.Ad8/ajp ITEM 3: Rancho California Water District Waterline Relocation The design of Improvement Plans for the relocation of approximately 1,250 lineal feet of existing 20" Rancho California Water District (RCWD) water main within an existing easement. This water main is in conflict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp locations. This work will be designed on separate plans to RCWD standards, and for the review of District plan checkers. Will require minimal field survey. Will require the preparation and processing of easement documents. Subtotal: $12,000.00 ITEM 4: Embassy Suites Parking Configuration Due to the modification to the north bound off-ramp, a portion of the existing parking must be re-configured. The estimate to include the parking lot modification into the Celttans plan set will require: 1 - layout sheet 1 - proposed construction sheet 1 - existing landscaping sheet 1 - proposed landscaping sheet 1 - detail sheet additional special provisions and standards covering the non Caltrans work Subtotal: $11,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT: $107,000 Section 2 Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed One Hundred Four Thousand Eight Hundred Eight Dollars ($104,808.00) All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $551,950 B. A portion of Amendment No. 4 lApproved 9/14/93) 3,330 C. A portion of Amendment No. 7 lApproved 5/10/94) 4,500 D. Proposed Amendment No. 8 107.000 Total: $666,780 -5- r:Xagdrpt\94\l 1 I5\CFD88-12.AdS/sjp Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement on the Date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: J.F. Davidson Associates Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -6- r:Xagdrpt\94~l 115\CFDgg-12.AdS/ajp ITEM 8 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI E CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECUULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 15, 1994 Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) Opposition Form PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the enclosed Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) Opposition Form. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO STOP THE $50 BILLION DOLLAR FIP BEFORE IT STOPS CALIFORNIA. DISCUSSION: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed for CALIFORNIA-ONLY new air quality rules known as the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). This plan proposes extreme air quality regulati, ons that hits all mobile sources including trains, planes, ships, trucks, ambulances, school buses, agricultural equipment, and other sources of pollution. While the City does support clean air efforts (converting six City vehicles to clean burning propane), the FIP, as proposed, has the potential to damage the state's fragile economic recovery. The League of California Cities has asked for the City of Temecula's support in opposing this plan, which has not yet been adopted. Potential impact of this 1,700 page plan include cutting back air flights to and from Los Angeles by as much as 70%, increasing trucking freight costs by as much as 30%, and forcing school buses off the road if they do not comply with the new standards. In addition, this plan was never voted on by Congress, and no elected official was part of its creation. Finally, the EPA, who drafted the plan, only conducted three hearings, to date, in California to allow for public comment. City Council Agenda Report Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) Opposition Form Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on the City for taking this action. According to the information provided by the League of California Cities, the FIP will create a severe economic hardship on the State of California. An independent analysis of the FIP shows that this plan will cost California 950 billion annually and result in 500,000 jobs lost. Attachment: League of California Cities Communication RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO STOP TFrE $50 BILLION DOLLAR ~ BEFORE IT STOPS CALWORNIA. WHEREAS, the environment and cleaner air is important to every Californian: and WHEREAS, billions of dollars have already been spent, and will continue to be spent, by the public and private sectors to achieve additional clean air benefits and clean air goals; and WHEREAS, multiple federal, state and local regulations require all businesses to reduce air emissions using expensive new technologies; and WHEREAS, California has suffered dramatic job and revenue losses, and is just beginning to recover from the recent economic recession; and WHY~REAS, the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) being forced on California would cause economic havoc; and WHY. PEAS, this 1,700 page plan will go into effect February 15, 1995, unless halted now; and WIFFEPEAS, the FIP proposes unattainable emission standards for California ports, planes, ships, railroads, trucks and every other mobile source; and WITEPEAS, an independent analysis of the FIP shows this air plan would cost California $50 billion annually and up to 500,000 jobs; and WIlE. PEAS, the California School Boards Association and School Transportation Coalition reports the FIP would cost California schools more than $600 million by rendering most school buses obsolete; and WHEREAS, forcing school buses off the road means at least 800,000 more cars on the road every day, with parents taking their kids to school which would cause more traffic congestion; and WHEREAS, the FIP would cost the Los Angeles area economy alone $35 billion, eliminate 345,000 jobs and disproportionately harm small businesses, minorities and economically disadvantaged people; and WITEREAS, the FIP will cost counties hundreds of millions of dollars to ml~lace engines on trucks, ambulances, fire-fighting equipment, trash haulers and other diesel operated vehicles, and California Small Business United, Western United Dairymen, Los Angeles Customs & Freight Brokers Ass'n, Eastern States Petroleum Ass'n, California Tomato Growers Ass'n, Southern California Business Ass'n, Los Angeles County Hotel/Motel Group, San Jose Chamber of Commerce, California Cattlemens' Ass'n, Dairyman's Cooperative Creamery Ass'n, Industry Manufacturers Council, California Business Properties Association, California Moving & Storage Ass'n, California Ass'n of Nurserymen, Raley's, Los Angeles County Aviation Commission, Market Wholesale Grocery Company, Campbell's Soup Co., American Medical Response, Home Express, San Gabriel Valley Commerce and Cities Consortium, Associated General Contractors, Central California Education Legislation Consortlure, California League of Food Processors, Ace Hardware Corporation and many others in opposition to the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) and requests the White House to take the necessary and immediate action to halt its implementation. Section #1. The City Clerk shah certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. City of Monrovia City of Ontario City of Fillmore C~tob~r 11, 1994 To: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Cotwailmembers From: Mayor Bob Bartlett City of Montovia Pp~i__d~nt, Lesgu~ of C=llfornia Cities Mayor Gus James -~kropos City of Ontario Mayor Linda Btewster City of Fillmore P~: Cities impacted by the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) ~ Federal Government is about to hit us with a multi-billion dollar disaster that will con $50 billion and 500,000 lost jobs. And we want your help to stop it. The U.S. Environmenial Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed for CAI.I~ORNIA-ONLY draconian new air quality rules known as the Federal Implementation Plan CHP) that strike at the economic heart of our slate and cities. Hastily assembled, the t--li' is a 1,700-page cut-and-paste job which adds up to the most expensive and ex~me sir regnh~nns ever proposed. It hits all mobile sources -- inClUding trains, planes, ships, minks, amb,,1.nces, school buses, agricultural equipment - and much, much more. Not only has EPA provided litfie, if any, scientific documentation for the FIP rifles, in i,i~'tice, they could acV,~11y increase pollution. According to the Sacramento Bee: *... the FIP would cripple the state economically without n__"~'-arily producing many air-q-nlity benefits.' According to Federico Pena. U.S. Secreraly of Tranlpormtion: "We believe that the plans will have extreme and unacceptable levels of impact on the economy, employment, and the free flow of commerce in the South Coast area." According to l. mes Stro~k. Secttory. California Environmental Protection Agency: "California, alone among all the states, is being led into a bleak, back-alley legal process for which there is no p_rec__~d_ent, no environmental rationale, no defense, and seemingly, no end. * While we applaud the FIP's goal of cleaner air - even the U.S. EPA ~dmits it cannot guarantee its olan will achieve lhat goal. To quote the EPA, 'quantif34ng these benefits has proven difficult." ~lere's some of the FIP hOgacts: · An independent analysis of the FIP shows this plan will cost Cnlifornia $50 billion snnuallv and result in .~00.000 lost jobs. · Trucking costs alone will run $3 billion to $5 billion ~,,~lbr ~ that means an approximate 30% freight rate increase aexoss the board. · Restrictions on airline otgrations will have a devastating impact. Flights in and out of Los Angeles could be cut back by as much as 70%. This would be a devastating shock on the California tourist, entertainment, convention, hotel and restaurant industries - and result in massive unemployment for relatively low-income service trades. · The C~llfornia School Boards Association and the School Trauspormtlon Coalition report that the FIP w~ll cost C~llfomia schools more than $600 million and render most current school buses obsolete. Forei~ school buses off the road means at le~t 800.000 more cars on the road, every day, with parents taking their kids to school Not only does that inconvenience parents, it makes traffic congestion worse. · C~liforRia agriculture will stiffer a huge blow from the FIP's transportation, pesticide and forced vehicle and equipment replacement. The Saticoy Lemon Growers Association which represents 300 Vantun-area citrus farmers said the 1~'11· would cause a major di~rUptj. on to · The FIP will cost the Los Angeles area economy alone $35 billion, eliminate 345,000jobs and disproportionately harm small businesses, minorities and economically disadvantaged people; and impacts on cities: Hundre~ls of millions of dollars to replace engines on trucks, ambulances, fire- fighting equipment, trash haulera and other vehicles. And hefty costs in fines and fees. Prematurely forces cities to switch its fleets to alternative fuel vehicles which will require the installation of fueling facilities that cost approximately $750,000 per site. Removes local control on air quality issues and gives it to the federal government. FIP fines, fees and engine replacements apply throughout the state and to all dries for all on-road ~uil)ment. not just the three non-attainment districts. Cities rely on a healthy economy and the FIP costs to local b-~inesses will strike an additional blow to our state's economic recovery. The FIP was never voted on by Congress. No 0omocrafically el_~__ed official was part of its creation and C~qlirorilialls had only three hearings to publicly commP, Rt. A broad-based statewide coalition opposed to the FIP is growht daily. More than 100 org~niTmlons and businesses inCludin~ the California Chamber of Commerce, C.~llfornia Manufacturers Ass'n, C~|iforlxia School Boards Ass'n, California Taxpayers' Ass'n, Califor~ia Clrocers Ass'n, Ag~6llltlll~ Conncil Of P~llfoIltia, Califorllh Rel~il Air Quality Coalition, C~ifornia Trucking Ass'n, Ope~ti,~$ Engineers, Local Union No. 3, l~i~k Producers Council, Air Transport Ass'n, School Trnn-.m)ortation Coalition, C~lifoHlia Restaurant Ass'n, National Federation of Independent B-~iness, Western United Dairymen, California Farm Bureau Federation and many othen want the FIP stopped. We want you to take the followln9 two actions immedi~elV: Action #1: Sign and'return the enclosed FIP opposition form. Action//2: Pass a resolution in opp_t~ion to the FIP. Enclosed is a ~mple resolution for your consideration. We all care about our environment and want cleaner air. But cleaner air should be achieved through smarter, and more cost-effective methods that don't destroy our state's economy. If you have any questions, pl~ don't hesitate to call one of us or Eric lensen, Coordinator - Stop the PIP Coalition at (415)340-0470. Thank you for your immolate action. We look forward to hearing from you. A~'FF2~rlON LOCAL I~.I-!?CTED OFFICIALI Sitm and return tod~v! STOP T1TE FI?! Local Elected Official Opposition Form PLEASE ADD MY NAME TO TWE STATEWIDE *STOP ~ ~ COALITION that includes the California Chamber of Commerce, California Manufacturers Aas'n, California School Boards Ass'n, California Taxpayers Ass'n, California Trucking Ass'n, Air Transpox~ Ass'n, California Farm Bureau Fedexation, California Restaurant Ass'n, National Federation of Independent Business, Home Depot, Raley's, Campbell's Soup Company, California School Transportaton Coalition, United Parcel Sexylet (UPS), California Building Industry Ass'n, Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3, Western T~ffic Conference, California Rr. tail A~r Quality Coalition, California Grocers Ass'n, Mexican-American Grocers Ass'n, Agricultural Council of ~alifornia, ]Vfilk Producers Council, California Sxnall Busine.ss Unite~, We~t~'n Unit~t Dairymen, Los Angeles Custom & Freight Bmk~x~ Ass'n, W~SWA'n State~ Petrnl~um Ass'n, California Pear Growers Ass'n, California Townto Growers Ass'n, Southern California Business Ass'n, Los Angeles County Hotel/Motel Gn~up, San Jose Chamber of Commen~, Cajifornia Cattlemens' Ass'n, Dairyman's Cooperative Creamery Ass'n, Grower-Shipper Vegetable Ass'n of Cenu'-al California, Indusn'y Manufacturers Council, Ca~fornia Grain and Feed Ass'n, C. aliforuia Independent Petroleum Ass'n, California Business Properties Association, California Con Growera, California Moving & Storage A~'n, California A~'n of Nur~--rymen, Raley's, Market Wholesale Grocery Coml~ny, CamphelPs Soup Co., American Medical Response, Home Express, Mac TooLs, San Gabriel Valley Commexce and Cites Consorturn, California Planting Cotton Seecl Distributors, Associated General Contractors, Central California Education Legislation Consortlure, California L~gue of Food Proce~or~, Ontario Chamber of C6mmerce, John Kautz t:anns, Ace I-Iardwar~ Corporation and many others. COUNT ME IN. I OPPOSE ~ FIP. I support cleaner air but the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) makes no sense for California. Then are smarter ways to achieve cleaner air without costing the state $50 billion and 500,000 lost jobs. You may use my name publicly In opposition. (Please print) Date Printed Nanae Authorized Signature District Mailing Address Phone Fax Please return to STOP THE FIP!: Fax: (415) 375-8148 Mail: 111 An-n B!vd.,//406, Burlingame, CA 94010. SAMPI ,F, CITY RESOLUTION Stop the $50 Billion Dollar FIP before it stops California Wttl:-REAS; The environment and cleaner air is important to event Californian; and WltEREAS; Billions of dollars have already been spent, and will continue to be spent, by the public and private sectors to achieve additional clean air benefits and clean air goalS; and Wl:52REAS; Multiple federal, state and local regulations require all businesses to reduce air emissWns using expensive new technnlogies; and WIP~,F_AS; California has suffered dramatic job and revenue losses, and is just beginning to recover from the recent economic recession; and WI~v;REAS; The Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) being forced on California would cause economic havoc; and WI:fi~EAS; This 1,700 page plan will go into effect February 15, 1995, unless halted now; and WWE~REAS; The FIP proposes unat'tainable emission standards for C~lifornia ports, planes, ships, railroads, trucks and every other mobile source; and WI~EREAS; An independent analysis of the FIP shows this air plan would cost California $50 billion atw and up to 500,000 jobs; and WI:fER.EAS; The California School Boards Association and School Transportation Coalition reports the FI~' would cost California schools more than $600 willion by rende~ng most school buses obsolete; and WFW. REAS; Forcing school buses off the road means at least 800,000 more can on the road every day, with parents taking their kids to school which would cause more traffic congestion; and W!~E~REAS; The FIP would cost the Los Angeles area economy alone $35 billion, eliminate 345,000jobs and disproportionately harm small businesses, minorities and economicaily disadvantaged people; and WHEREAS; The FIP will cost counties hundreds of willions of dollars to replace engines on trucks, ambulances, fire-fighting equipment, trash hattiers and other diesel operated vehicles, and WFIF. REAS; THE FIP FINES. FEES AND ENGINE RF. PLACEIVflS?fF llF. GULATIONS APPI,Y THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND TO ALL C1YIY_S FOR ALL ON-ROAD EOUIPMENT. NOT .lUST THE THREE NON-A~fAINMENT DISTRICTS; and WHEREAS; WT-IU.E CITIES SUPPORT CLEANER AIR, TI-IE FIP Wu.T. P~TUI~P-I.Y FORCE COUNTrI~.~ TO SWITCH 1TS FLEETS TO ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES WHICH WOULD REQUIRE INSTALLATION OF FUngi J]qG FACILITIES THAT COST A MINIMUM OF $1 IVffLLION PER SITE; and WHEREAS; C1TIES WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THE I-t'F.~-xY COSTS FOR 5. FACILITIES, FINES, FI~.I=_~ AND NEW EQUIPMENT; and WHEREAS; CITIES RELY ON A HEALTHY ECONOMY AND THE PIP COSTS TO LOCAL BUSINESSES WOULD STRIKE AN ADDITIONAL BLOW TO CITIES AND M STA'fI::'S ECONOMIC RY:t'OVERY; and The FIP removes local control on air quality issues and gives it to the federal government; and Wltl~.REAS; We applaud the FIP's goal of cleaner air but the U.S. EPA slates it cannot guarantee its plan will achieve the goal and that the FIP's benefits have been difficult to quantify; and WltF. REAS; The Secretary of the California Enviwnmenlal Protection Agency says about the FIP: "California, alone among all the slates, is being led into a bleak, back-alley legal p_roces__s for which them is no precedent, no environmental rationale, no defense, and seemingly, no end"; and WNE1F, AS; The League of California Cities President, Monrovia Mayor Bob Bartlett states: ,r .lh~ every C~lifornian, we all want cleaner air, but turning the s~t~ upside down to support bureaucratic regulations without any guarantee of achieving the goal is, forgive me, crazy*; and WltlgREAS; The FIP was never voted on by Congress; no democratically elected federal, slam or local official was part of its creation and the California public has had only three hearings to publicly comment; and NOW, TErlg~RI~.I~2)RE, BE IT Ilv-qOLVED the City Council joins with the cities of Ontario, Hawthorne, Colton, Camarillo and Fillmore; the C~llfomia Chamber of Commerce, C~llfornil Manufacturers Ass'n, California School Boards Ass'n, California Taxpayers Ass'n, C,~llfornia Trucking Ass'n, Air Trsnspon Ass'n, California Farm Bureau Federation, California Restaurant Ass'n, National Federation of Independent Business, Home Depot, Raley's, Campbell's Soup Company, California School Transportation C ~ion, California Building Industry Ass'n, Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3, Western Traffic L ~-rence, California Retail Air Quality Coalition, California Grocers Ass'n, Mexican-American Grocers Ass'n, Agricultural Council of California, Milk Producers Council, California'Small Business United, WesUn'n United Dairymen, Los Angeles Customs & Freight Bwlcers Ass'n, Western S~r~ Petroleum Ass'n, C~llforllia Tomato Growers Ass'n, Southern California Business Ass'n, Los Angeles County HotelflVlolel Group, San Jose Chamber of Commerce, California Cattlemens' Ass'n, Dairyman's Cooperative Creamery Ass'n, IndusWy Manufacturers Council, California Business Properties Association, California Moving & Storage Ass'n, California Ass'n of Nurserymen, Raley's, Los Angeles County Aviation Commi-~ion, Market Whole~le Grocery Company, Campbell's Soup Co., American Medical Response, Home Express, San Gabriel Valley Commerce and Cities Consortlure, Associated General Contractors, Central California Education Legi~htlon Consortlure, California League of Food Processors, Ace Hardware Corporation and many othen in opposition to the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) and requests the While House to ~k~ the necessary and immediate action m halt its implementation. Authorized Signature Title Date Address Phone FAX Please return to: STOP ~ FIP at FAX (415) 340-1740 or (415) 375-8148. MAll. TO: 111/knTn Blvd., //406, Burling~me, CA 94010; (4153 540-0470. ITEM 9 FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Interim Finance Officer November 15, 1994 General Liability Insurance Renewal Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of the City's Municipal General, Automobile, and Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West, the annual premium is $98,633, and Automobile Physical Damage, at a premium of $5,869. DISCUSSION: The City's current liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West expires on December 1, 1994. Staff, in conjunction with the City's insurance broker, Mike Bush, who represents CaI-Surance, reviewed the proposals received from eight municipal insurance carriers: 2. 3. 4. 5o 6. 7. 8. Insurance Company of the West (ICW) Reliance Insurance Co. (Reliance) American International Group Companies (AIG) Cigna Insurance (Cigna) Home Insurance Comicany (Home) Municipal Mutual Insurance Company (MMIC) National Casualty Insurance Company (National) Associated International Insurance Company (All) The proposals were reviewed on the basis of: 1) Policy form; 2) Policy limits and provisions; 3) Company's knowledge of the industry; 4) Company stability; and 5) Customer service. The City desires to maintain an 'Occurrence' policy, not a 'Claims Made' policy form for all coverages. Essentially, a Claims Made policy is only valid during the policy period, because the claim must be filed during the POliCy term. The Occurrence policy insures during the term of the policy period, however claims may be filed after the policy term. Three of the above companies provide the Occurrence policy form: ICW; Home; and; MMIC. ICW proposed the highest aggregate limits. Additionally, ICW demonstrated extensive and long-term knowledge of the municipal insurance arena, along with sound company stability. Further, the City, through direct experience, has received beneficial and responsive customer service from ICW. Based upon the analysis of the proposals, staff recommends renewal of the policy with Insurance Company of the West (ICW) at an annual premium of $98,633. There are no revisions proposed in the policy, which specifies coverage of $1,000,000 plus $4,000,000 in excess coverage. The policy is written on an occurrence form, provides a $50,000 Self-Insured Retention (SIR) level and includes an extended reporting period provision. Additionally, the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency are also named as insured. The general liability insurance renewal also includes coverage for automobile physical damage. Previously this coverage has been provided by another insurer. In anticipation of the expiration of the auto physical damage policy, new proposals were obtained from the following companies: 2, 3. 4. Chubb Custom Insurance Company Insurance Company of the West Home Insurance Company Fireman's Fund Insurance Company The proposals were evaluated on the basis of coverage, deductible and premium. Based upon this review, staff recommends Insurance Company of the West, The proposal submitted by ICW includes the following provisions: Coverage: Deductible: Premium: Actual Cash Value; Comprehensive/Collision $1,000 Comprehensive $2,500 Collision $5,869 Should the City Council authorize renewal of the general liability policy with ICW, the auto physical damage with be added by way of endorsement to the policy, at an additional premium of $5,869. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds for the general liability premium amount are appropriated in the Insurance Internal Service Fund, account number 300-199-999- 5200. Adequate funds for the automobile physical damage premium amount are appropriated in the Insurance Internal Service Fund, account number 300-199-999- 5201. attachment: ICW Proposal INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST PROPOSAL B. C. D. COMPANY: INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST (A:VIII/ADMITTED TERM: 12-01-94/95 FORM: OCCURRENCE LIMIT/COVERAGE (PRIMARY) PREMIUM 91,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER SELF-INSURED RETENTION (S.I.R.) 95,000,000 AGGREGATE MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY INCLUDED 91,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER S.I.R. 91,000,000 AGGREGATE PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS 91,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER S.I.R. NO AGGREGATE MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (OWNED, NON-OWNED & HIRED AUTOMOBILE) SELF-INSURED RETENTION: 950,000 LIMIT/COVERAGE (EXCESS) 94,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER UNDERLYING PREMIUM INCLUDED 94,000,000 AGGREGATE MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY $4,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER UNDERLYING $4,000,000 AGGREGATE PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS $4,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS NO AGGREGATE OVER UNDERLYING MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY TOTAL LIMITS (D & F) $5,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER SELF-INSURED RETENTION (S.I.R.) $9,000,000 AGGREGATE MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY $5,000,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER S.I.R. $5,000,O00AGGREGATE PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS $5,000 OCCURRENCE EXCESS OVER S.I.R. MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY PREVIOUS YEARS' PREMIUMS 1991 a. Premium & Broker Fee $97,727 b. CIGA Fee 466 c. Extended Reporting 2,674 Period d. TOTAL PREMIUM $100,867 1992 $97,846 N/A N/A $97,846 PREMIUM $95,133 + 3.500 BrokerFee $98,633 1993 $103,000 N/A N/A $103,000 1994 $98,633 N/A In~l. $98,633 ITEM 10 APPROVA~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Completion and Acceptance of the Pre-cast T-sections Portion of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: a) Accept the pre-cast bridge T-sections portion of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02, as complete, and b) Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND: In January of 1993, the City of Temecula received a significant amount of rainfall. The floods resulting from those events had an impact on a number of public and private facilities. In at least one instance, within the City limits, the residents of a neighborhood were without any access due to the floods. Liefer Road was severed at its intersection with Nicolas Road leaving homeowners stranded for a number of days. In response to concern for public health and safety, Staff met with the Fereral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA} and the State of California Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives after the storms to discuss the potential for Federal and State funding for the design and construction of a "crossing" at that location. On November 9, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the supply and installation of pre-cast bridge tees for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93- 02, to Spancrete of California for $20,650.00. This portion of the proiect included the installation of pre-cast bridge T-sections for the construction of a sixty-two foot (62') long concrete bridge over the Santa Gertrudis Creek. r:~agdrpfi94~lllS\pw93~32s.acc The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, FISCAL IMPACT: On November 9, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the supply and installation of pre-cast bridge tees for the construction of Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, to Spancrete of California for $20,650.00. There were no change orders associated with this portion of the project. This project is up to 93.75% reimbursable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State of California Office of Emergency Services per Damage Survey Report Number 97284. The remaining cost should be reimbursed to the City through a future assessment district for improvements to Liefer Road. Attachments: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Contractor's Affidavit r:~agdt~t\94~lll~\pw~3-O2s.acc RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 BUsiness Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Spancrete of California to perform the following work of improvement: Supply and install pre-cast bridge tees for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November 15, 1994. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Spancrete of California Pre-cast Bridge T-sections portion of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02. 6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF LIEFER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, OVER THE SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, Dated at Temecula, California, this 15th day of November. 1994. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) ' JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. r:~agdtpt\94\1115\pwg~-O2s.ncc ITEM 11 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: ~"/~ DATE: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Bids for the Acquisition of Right-Of-Way Weed Control Applications Contract (Project No. PW94-20) PREPARED BY: ~9~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for the annual right-of-way weed control contract (Project No. PW94-20). BACKGROUND: The 1994-1995 program of services for the Public Works Maintenance Division includes pre- emergent and post-emergent applications for right-of-way weed control, in order to maintain a neat, weed free right-of-way and in order to insure visibility at intersections. The contract for applications for right-of-way weed control is large enough that the request for bid proposals must be advertised and sealed bids received in order to determine the lowest responsible bidder. FISCAL IMPACT: $35,000 is included in the Fiscal Year 1994-95 budget in the Public Works Maintenance Account No. 100-164-601-5402 for right-of-way applications. Attachments: Exhibit "A" Scope of Work r:~agdtpfi94~l 115\pw94-20.bid/ajp ATTACHMENT "A" ATtACHMENT"A" AA-1 r:\cip~ptojects~pw94-20~bidpkg 10111/94 ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: S U BJ E CT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Funding Agreement for Murrieta Creek Botanical Assessment Consultant Services PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development )~f~/Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the attached agreement between the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, (DISTRICT), Kemper Community Development Company, (DEVELOPER), and the City of Temecula, (CITY), providing for the financing of Botanical Assessment Consulting (CONSULTANT) services required as a condition of the issuance of an Emergency Permit by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers following the January 1993 flooding; Appropriate eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00) in the Public Works/Special Projects account for a deposit as the estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on the reach of the Murrieta Creek Channel not owned by either DEVELOPER or DISTRICT. BACKGROUND: In the Spring of 1993, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued an emergency permit jointly to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT), Kemper Community Development Company, (DEVELOPER), and the City of Temecula, (CITY), following the flooding along Murrieta Creek Channel so that the three parties could undertake emergency flood protection and remedial/restorative work along said Creek. One condition for the approval of this emergency permit was that a botanical assessment in the Murrieta Creek Channel be performed. The accompanying Funding Agreement sets forth the financial responsibility of the parties, the required deposit, the accounting process, and the process for reimbursement or additional deposits required. r:~aidrt,t\94~l 115~nurcd~bo.~au The CONSULTANT selected is Tierra Madre Consultants, inc. The DISTRICT will administer the Consulting Services Agreement for convenience purposes. A copy of this agreement is included in the Funding Agreement package. FISCAL IMPACT: This project will require an appropriation and deposit. There is a possible increase in or reimbursement of a portion of the deposit depending on final accounting determination. CITY'S initial deposit is in the amount of $8,900 to be placed in the Public Works/Special Projects Account No. 100-164-603-5248. Attachment: Funding Agreement/DISTRICT, DEVELOPER, AND CITY Consulting Services Agreement/DISTRICT and CONSULTANT 2 6 8 9 lO ll 16 17 18 20 21 22 2~ 26 FUNDING AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ("DISTRICT"), the CITY OF TF2{ECULA, ("CITY"), and K~PER COb~UNITY DEVELOPMENT COMP/U~Y, ("DEVELOPER"), hereby agree as follows: RECITALS A. In the Spring of 1993, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS ("PERMIT") jointly to DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER after devastating flooding occurred along Murrieta Creek Channel so that DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER could undertake emergency flood protection and remedial/ restorative work along CREEK; and B. As part of PERMIT, a botanical assessment in Murrieta Creek Channel is required; and C. DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER will each contribute toward the cost of a consultant ("CONSULTANT") an amount which will cover the costs of CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment on DISTRICT'S, CITY'S and DEVELOPER'S respective reaches of Murrieta Creek Channel; and D. For convenience, the DISTRICT will administer a consulting services agreement on behalf of DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER for CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment. A copy of the consulting services agreement is -1- ! 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 attached hereto substantially in final form as Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. IT IS THEREFORE, mutually agreed as follows: 1. DISTRICT shall administer a consulting services agreement with CONSULTANT to perform the botanical assessment required as part of PERMIT. 2. CITY has deposited eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00) as an estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on CITY'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, CITY shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse CITY within thirty (30) days. 3. DEVELOPER has deposited nine thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($9,350.00) as an estimate of DEVELOPER'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on DEVELOPER'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, DEVELOPER shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S -2- 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 work costs, days. DISTRICT will reimburse DEVELOPER within thirty (30) Each party, as to any claim or liability arising out of any act or omission with references to any work performed by or authority delegated to such party as a result of this agreement, shall save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties. and their officers and employees from all liability for death or injury to person, or damage to property, or claim therefor. 5. Any notices sent or required to be sent to either party shall be mailed to the following addresses: ~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEMECULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive 1995 Market Street Temecula, CA 92590 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 Attn: Ray Casey KEMPER COMbg3NITY DEVELOPM]ENT, CO. 27555 Ynez Road Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Mr. Dennis Chiniaeff 6. This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this agreement in its final form. 7. Any waiver by DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER of any breach by the other of any one or more of the terms of this agreement -3- 1 2 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 !:1. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall not be construed to be a waiver of breach of the same or of any other term hereof. part of DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER to require any subsequent or other Failure on th~ exact, full and complete compliance with any term of this agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms hereof, or estopping DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER from enforcement hereof. 8. This agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters herein, and is a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof. This agreement shall not be changed or modified except by the written consent of all parties hereto. // // -4- 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 26 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer By Chairman, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel ByD )~uty Dated 7- GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: City Engineer Dated //- '/- e APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) KEMPER COb~4UNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO By Title ( NOTARY ) -5- EXHIBIT "A" Consulting Services Agreement for Botanical Assessment 1 2 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DISTRICT, CONSULT/~NTS, as follows: 1. CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION hereinafter called "DISTRICT", and TIERRAMADRE INC., hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby agree PROJECT - CONSULTANT shall perform consulting services for the project described as Murrieta Creek Biological Assessment for U.S.C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS, Project No. 7-0-0020. SCOPE OF SERVICES - CONSULTANT shall furnish tools, equipment, facilities, materials and labor necessary to perform in a complete, skillful and professional manner those consulting services described on Attachment "A" hereto and made a part hereof. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE - CONSULTANT shall commence performance of service upon execution of this Agreement, and shall diligently perform the services for a period of one year after the date of commencement. COMPENSATION - DISTRICT shall pay CONSULTANT for services performed and expenses incurred in accordance with the standard rates set forth on Attachment "B" hereto and made a part hereof. The total amount of compensation paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of forty thousand dollars ($40,000) unless a written amendment to this Agreement is executed by both parties prior to - i - 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 performance Of additional services. 5. PAYMENT - Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT following satisfactory performance of the services as set forth herein and within thirty (30) days after DISTRICT'S receipt of appropriate monthly invoices from CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall keep employee and expense records according to customary accounting methods and such records shall be available for inspection by DISTRICT to verify the invoices of CONSULTANT. All invoices shall itemize charges to conform with the portion(s) of work and estimated costs as set forth on Attachment "B". 6. LICENSES - CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors shall maintain professional licenses required by the laws of the State of California at all times while performing services under this Agreement. 7. PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY - DISTRICT will obtain all rights of entry as may be required to perform the proposed consulting services within and upon privately-owned property. All permits and rights of entry as may be required from any and all affected public entities shall be obtained by CONSULTANT. Sufficient obtained such permits and/or rights furnished to DISTRICT by CONSULTANT, evidence of having of entry shall be prior to initiation of work. CONSULTANT will prosecute the work in such a manner as to minimize public inconvenience and possible hazard, - 2 - 1 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 12 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 24 25 26 28 10. will restore the streets and other work areas to their original condition and former usefulness as soon as practicable. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the protection of public and private property adjacent to the work and shall exercise due caution to avoid damage to such property. NOTICES - Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501-1719 TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware Of the laws of the State of California requ.iring employers to be insured against liability for worker's compensation and shall comply with such laws during the term of this Agreement. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS - CONSULTANT agrees to and shall indemnify and hold DISTRICT, its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from all claims, actions, d~ma~es and liabilities of whatsoever kind and nature arising from death, personal injury, property damage or other cause asserted or, based upon any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, invitees, or any subcontractor of CONSULTANT relating to or in any way - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 connected with the accomplishment of the work or perform~ of services under this Agreement, regardless of the existence or degree of fault or negligence on the part of DISTRICT or any officer or employee of said DISTRICT, other than the active negligence of DISTRICT, its officers, employees or agents. As part hereto of the foregoing indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to protect and to defend at its own expense, including attorneys' fees, DISTRICT, its officers, agents and employees from any and all legal action based upon any acts or omissions, as stated hereinabove, by any person or persons. WORK PRODUCT - CONSULTANT shall provide DISTRICT with a minimum of eight (8) original copies of each of the final quarterly reports. All drawings, logs and reports shall be and remain the sole property of DISTRICT. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by either CONSULTANT or DISTRICT upon written notice to the other party in the event of substantial failure of performance by the other party or in the event DISTRICT shall elect to abandon or indefinitely postpone the project. In the event DISTRICT abandons or indefinitely postpones the project and gives such notice of termination, DISTRICT shall make payment for all services performed to the date of written notice in a total amount which bears the same ratio to the total maximum fee otherwise payable under this Agreement -- - 4 - 2 13. 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 14. II II the services actually performed bear to the total services necessary for performance of this Agreement. ASSIGNMENT - Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof shall be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of DISTRICT. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not engage in nor permit others he may employ to engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of the race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, physical handicap, disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), medical condition, marital status or sex of such personS, in accordance with the provision of California Labor Code Section 1735. - 5 - . 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Agreement is executed on RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer SCT:mcv- agrmt987 09/15/94 (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTPaL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC By Responsible Officer Printed Name Title krea Code/Phone Number - 6 - Murrieta Creek C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment Prepared for: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street P.O. Box 1033 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 (909) 275-1233 (FAX) 788-9965 Contact: Art Krueger Prepared by: TIERRA MADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 (909) 684-7081 (FAX) 784-5647 Contact: Jack Easton/Michael Pantoja 31 August 1994 Revised 14 September 1994 Murrieta Creek Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment INTRODUCTION Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc. CYMC) proposes to perform a Botanical Assessment of the Murrieta Creek Channel for compliance with the conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (C.O.E.) Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS. The project area (Channel) extends from Hawthorn Street to Old Town Temecula (33,800_+ linear feet) and within this area encompasses the entire channel, from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. The Channel is divided into three distinct reaches as follows: Reach 1: Responsibility of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) - Hawthorn St. to the Temecula Rancho line - 20,100_+ linear feet Reach 2: Responsibility ofKemper Community Development-Temeeula Rancho line to vicinity of Rancho California Road (300_+ feet downstream) - 6,500_+ linear feet Reach 9: Responsibility of City of Temecula - vicinity of Rancho California Road to vicinity of Second San Diego Aqueduct - 7,200+ linear feet The proposed Scope of Services consists of field surveys, preparation of quarterly reports (one for each Reach), and as-needed consultation. This proposal includes a detailed estimate of the cost to perform the services for each reach. TMC will account for and separately invoice the District for the respective Reaches of the Channel. SCOPE OF SERVICES I. TMC proposes to collect field data by sampling the vegetation within the Channel. A. Sampling transeets will be located at 1,000-foot intervals along the entire length of the Channel. Each transect will be 5.0 feet in width and will extend, perpendicular to the flow line, from the top-of-bank to the top-of-bank. The location of each transect will be marked on-site and will be noted on an appropriate base map of the Channel (i.e. scale 1" = 200'), photographs will be taken of each transect. The transeets will be surveyed as close as possible to the original location for each of the quarte~y surveys. A total of 33 transects will be established along the Channel (20 within Reach 1, 7 within Reach 2, and 6 within Reach 3). B. Each sampling transect will be surveyed on a quarterly basis for a total of four surveys during the one-year duration of the Botanical Assessment. Surveys will be performed in September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995. As there is expected to be only minimal change in species composition and structure between the September and December surveys, the December 1994 survey may consist only of noting changes in site conditions (e.g. vegetation removed by scouring) or, may consist of a full sampling effort. The actual survey type to be performed will be determined through cor~sultation with the District following the completion of the September survey and through a review of site conditions (e.g. flooding). |4 ~:E/q'FrJ~IIF, R 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRJC ATTACHMENT "A" C. On each transect survey, sampling will be performed to provide information on the species composition and structure per the C.O.E. specified Mitigation Success Criteria. At each 3.0-foot interval along the transect, a point will be projected vertically into the vegetation. Each species intercepted by the point will be recorded, providing a tally of "hits" for each species. The height of marsh, riparian, and/or mulefat scrub vegetation will be measured at each point. Percent cover and avenge height for each vegetati6n layer will be calculated from these data. Finally, a list of all additional species within the 5.0-foot wide Wansect will be made. Transect surveys will be performed by a two- person crew consisting of a Senior Biologist and a Field Technician. D. As part of the first of the quarterly surveys (September 1994), the entire Channel will be surveyed to identify locations of non-native vegetation including those species identified in the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria. The species present will be noted and their distribution will be recorded on the base map of the Channel. Non-native vegetation surveys will be performed by a Field Technician under the direction of a Senior Biologist. E. Following the implementation of techniques to control non-native vegetation, TMC will survey the entire Channel to assess the success of the control techniques. The survey will be performed in spring of 1995 (e.g. April). Those areas which have been successfully treated and any areas requiring additional treatment will be noted on the base map of the Channel. ft. TMC proposes to prepare quarterly reports to document the results of the vegetation sampling surveys. A. Upon completion of each quarterly sampling survey TMC will prepare three quarterly reports (one for each of the three reaches). Information to be presented in the reports wLll include: description of the survey area, sampling methodology, results of the sampling surveys, a discussion of changes in the vegetation relative to the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria, maps and photographs, and copies of field data sheets. The reports will also recommend techniques for control of non-native vegetation which may be present in the Channel and will assess the success of such control techniques following their implementation. B. Each quarterly report will be submitted to the District in a Draft format for review and comment. TMC will meet with the District, as-needed, to discuss any comments and revise the reports. Final reports will be prepared and submitted following consultation with the District. rrl. A TMC Senior Biologist will be available, as-needed, to consult with District personnel and/or personnel of regulatory agencies regarding survey methodology, data interpretation, and any other pertinent issues. Consultation with personnel of regulatory agencies will be conducted only at the direction of the District. 14 SEFr!~BER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK 2 ATTACHMENT "A" SCHEDULE I. Field surveys will be completed during the month specified for the respective quarterly surveys (i.e. September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995). II. Draft quarterly reports will be completed and submitted to the District no later than the fifteenth of the following month (i.e. September 1994 survey results to be submitted in Draft report no later than 15 October 1994). Final quarterly reports will be submitted to the District within one week of receipt of the District comments on the Draft reports or within 30 days of submittal of Draft report if no comments are received. 14 S~BER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MUI~R C~K 3 ATTACHMENT "A" NOT-TO-EXCEED COST ESTIMATE FIELD SURVEYS {{ sEPT. 9, { N~' II DEc. 9, 2,575.00 890.00 795.00 946.00 515.00/ 2,575.00 2,575.00 ~ $ 9,186.00/ 2,575.00~' 11,246.00 ,90.00 275.00,,90.00890.® 890.00 4 _ 490.00 275.00/ 795.00 795.00 t $ 3 150.00/ 795.00 2,670.00 REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REPORT PREPARATION REACH I 1,940.00 320.00/ 1,020.00 1.020.00 REACH 2 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 900.00 REACH 3 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 900.00 JUN 95 TOTAL & NNV 2,220.00 $ 5,500.00/ 6.200.00 1,745.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5,080.00 1,745.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5,080.00 REACH 1 REACH2 REACH 3 CONSULTATION ::.Sfftl~/q~4 :::::2!: :DEC. 94: MAR.:95: JUN 95: 190.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 70.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 TOTAL. $ 550.00 $ 220.00 $ 150.00 GRAND TOTAL REACH2 '~ 3,435.00/ 4,050.00 REACH 3 ::: ;:; 3 150.00/ 4,500.00/ :: ],670.00 5,080.00 :: 9, 186.00/ 5,500.00/ 550.00 11,246.00 6.200.00 4,500.00/ 220.00 5.080.00 150.00 :TOTAL COST $15,236.00/ 17,996.00 $ 8 155.00/ ~.350.00 $ 7 800.00/ ~.900.00 The above costs are based on the following billing rates: Principal $80/hr. Senior Biologist $60/hr. Field Technician $35/hr. Draftsman $35/hr. 14 SEPTF_MBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK .4 A'R'ACHMENT ' 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 24 25 26 28 FUNDING AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ("DISTRICT"), the CITY OF TEMECULA, ("CITY"), and KEMPER COMMLrNITY DEVELOPENT COMPANY, ("DEVELOPER"), hereby agree as follows: RECITALS A. In the Spring of 1993, the U.S. krmy Corps of Engineers issued Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS ("PERMIT") jointly to DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER after devastating flooding occurred along Murrieta Creek Channel so that DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER could undertake emergency flood protection and remedial/ restorative work along CREEK; and B. As part of PERMIT, a botanical assessment in Murriel Creek Channel is required; and C. DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER will each contribute toward the cost of a consultant ("CONSULTANT") an amount which will cover the costs of CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment on DISTRICT'S, CITY'S and DEVELOPER'S respective reaches of Murrieta Creek Channel; and D. For convenience, the DISTRICT will administer a consulting services agreement on behalf of DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER for CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment. A copy of the consulting services agreement is -1- 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 attached hereto substantially in final form as Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. IT IS THEREFORE, mutually agreed as follows: 1. DISTRICT shall administer a consulting services agreement with CONSULTANT to perform the botanical assessment required as part of PERMIT. 2. CITY has deposited eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00) as an estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on CITY'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45} days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, CITY shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse CITY within thirty (30) days. 3. DEVELOPER has deposited nine thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($9,350.00) as an estimate of DEVELOPER'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on DEVELOPER'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, DEVELOPER shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S -2- 4 5 6 8 9 10 !l 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 26 27 28 work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse DEVELOPER within thirty (30) days. 4. Each party, as to any claim or liability arising out of any act or omission with references to any work performed by or authority delegated to such party as a result of this agreement, shall save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties and their officers and employees from all liability for death or injury to person, or damage to property, or claim therefor. 5. Any notices sent or required to be sent to either partyi shall be mailed to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TF/4ECULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive 1995 Market Street Temecula, CA 92590 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 Attn: Ray Casey KEMPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO. 27555 Ynez Road Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Mr. Dennis Chiniaeff 6. This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their ' respective counsel. The fact that this agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared, this agreement in its final form. 7. Any waiver by DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER of any breach. by the other of any one or more of the terms of this agreement -3- 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the part of DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER to require exact, full and complete compliance with any term of this agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms hereof, or estopping DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER from enforcement hereof. 8. This agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters herein, and is a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof. This agreement shall not be changed or modified except by the written consent of all parties hereto. // // -4- 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 !2 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, agreement on RECO~e~ENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer the parties hereto have executed this (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel Deputy Dated 4- ~ 7-~¢ ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney EWR:SlJ 9/22/94 CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) KEMPER COMbgDNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO By Title ( NOTARY ) -5- EXHIBIT "A" Consulting Services Agreement for Botanical Assessment 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", and TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC., hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby agree as follows: 1. PROJECT - CONSULTANT shall perform consulting services for the project described as Murrieta Creek Biological Assessment for U.S.C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS, Project No. 7-0-0020. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES - CONSULTANT shall furnish tools, equipment, facilities, materials and labor necessary to perform in a complete, skillful and professional manner those consulting services described on Attachment "A" hereto and made a part hereof. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE - CONSULTANT shall commence performance of service upon execution of this Agreement, and shall diligently perform the services for a period of one year after the date of commencement. COMPENSATION - DISTRICT shall pay CONSULTANT for services performed and expenses incurred in accordance with the standard rates set forth on Attachment "B" hereto and made a part hereof. The total amount of compensation paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of forty thousand dollars ($40,000) unless a written amendment to this Agreement is executed by both parties prior to - I - 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 26 ~7 performance of additional services. 5. PAYMENT - Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT following satisfactory performance of the services as set forth herein and within thirty (30) days after DISTRICT'S receipt of appropriate monthly invoices from CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall keep employee and expense records according to customary accounting methods and such records shall be available for inspection by DISTRICT to verify the invoices of CONSULTANT. All invoices shall itemize charges to conform with the portion(s) of work and estimated costs as set forth on Attachment "B". 6. LICENSES - CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors shall maintain professional licenses required by the laws of the State of California at all times while performing services under this Agreement. 7. PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY - DISTRICT will obtain all rights of entry as may be required to perform the proposed consulting services within and upon privately-owned property. All permits and rights of entry as may be required from any and all affected public entities shall be obtained by CONSULTANT. Sufficient evidence of having obtained such permits and/or rights of entry shall be furnished to DISTRICT by CONSULTANT, prior to initiation of work. CONSULTANT will prosecute the work in such a manner as to minimize public inconvenience and possible hazard, -~d - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 !2 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 will restore the streets and other work areas to their original condition and former usefulness as soon as practicable. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the protection of public and private property adjacent to the work and shall exercise due caution to avoid damage to such property. NOTICES - Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501-1719 TIERRAM3~DRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 WORK~R'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of the laws of the State of California requ~iring employers to be insured against liability for worker's compensation and shall comply with such laws during the term of this Agreement. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HAPLESS - CONSULTANT agrees to and shall indeuulify and hold DISTRICT, its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from all claims, actions, d~m~es and liabilities of whatsoever kind and nature arising from death, personal injury, property damage or other cause asserted or, based upon any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, invitees, or any subcontractor of CONSULTANT relating to or in any way - 3 - 2 8 10 12 17 18 20 21 22 2~ 2~ 2S 26 27 28 13. 14. II II the services actually performed bear to the total services necessary for performance of this Agreement. ASSIGNMENT ~ Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof shall be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of DISTRICT. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not engage in nor permit others he may employ to engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of the race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, physical handicap, disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), medical condition, marital status or sex of such personS, in accordance with the provision of California Labor Code Section 1735. - 5 - , 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Agreement is executed on RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer SCT:mcv agrmt987 09/15/94 be Zllled in by Clerk of ~he Board) RIVEPSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. M3~LONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, By Responsible Officer Printed Name Title Azea Code/Phone Number - 6 - Murrieta Creek C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment Prepared for: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street P.O. Box 1033 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 (909) 275-1233 (FAX) 788-9965 Contact: Art Krueger Prepared by: TIERRA MADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 (909) 684-7081 (FAX) 784-5647 Contact: Jack Easton/Mich'ael Pantoja 31 August 1994 Revised 14 September 1994 Murrieta Creek Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment INTRODUCTION TieHa Madre Consultants, Inc. CYMC) proposes to perform a Botanical Assessment of the Murrieta Creek Channel for compliance with the conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (C.O.E.) Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS. The project area (Channel) extends from Hawthorn Street to Old Town Temecula (33,800_+ linear feet) and within this area encompasses the entire channel, from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. The Channel is divided into tl'tree distinct reaches as follows: Reach 1: Responsibility of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) - Hawthorn St. to the Temecula Rancho line - 20,100+ linear feet Reach 2: Responsibility ofKemper Community Development-Temecula Rancho line to vicinity of Rancho California Road (300_+ feet downstream) - 6,500_+ linear feet Reach 3: Responsibility of City of Temecula - vicinity of Rancho California Road to vicinity of Second San Diego Aqueduct - 7,200+ linear feet The proposed Scope of Services consists of field surveys, preparation of quarterly reports (one for each Reach), and as-needed consultation. This proposal includes a detailed estimate of the cost to perform the services for each reach. TMC will account for and separately invoice the District for the respective Reaches of the Channel. SCOPE OF SERVICES I. TMC proposes to collect field data by sampling the vegetation within the Channel. A. Sampling transects will be located at 1,000-foot intervals along the entire length of the Channel. Each transect will be 5.0 feet in width and will extend, perpendicular to the flow line, from the top-of-bank to the top-of-bank. The location of each transect will be marked on-site and will be noted on an appropriate base map of the Channel (i.e. scale 1" = 200'), photographs will be taken of each transect. The transects will be surveyed as close as possible to the original location for each of the quarterly surveys. A total of 33 transects will be established along the Channel (20 within Reach 1, 7 within Reach 2, and 6 within Reach 3). B. Each sampling transect will be surveyed on a quarterly basis for a total of four surveys during the one-year duration of the Botanical Assessment. Surveys will be performed in September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995. As there is expected to be only minimal change in species composition and structure between the September and December surveys, the December 1994 survey may consist only of noting changes in site conditions (e.g. vegetation removed by scouting) or, may consist of a full sampling effort. The actual survey type to be performed will be determined through cor~sultation with the District following the completion of the September survey and through a review of site conditions (e.g. flooding). 14 SEPTEMBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CR.K A'!'FACHMENT "A" C. On each transect survey, sampling will be performed to provide information on the species composition and structure per the C.O.E. specified Mitigation Success Criteria. At each 3.0-foot interval along the transect, a point will be projected vertically into the vegelation. Each species intercepted by the point will be recorded, providing a tally of "hits" for each species. The height of marsh, riparian, and/or mulefat scrub vegetation will be measured at each point. Percent cover and average height for each vegetatibn layer will be calculated from these data. Finally, a list of all additional species within the 5.0-foot wide transect will be made. Transect surveys will be performed by a two- person crew consisting of a Senior Biologist and a Field Technician. D. As part of the first of the quarterly surveys (September 1994), the entire Channel will be surveyed to identify locations of non-native vegetation including those species identified in the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria. The species present will be noted and their distribution will be recorded on the base map of the Channel. Non-native vegetation surveys will be performed by a Field Technician under the direction of a Senior Biologist. E. Following the implementation of techniques to control non-native vegetation, TMC will survey the entire Channel to assess the success of the control techniques. The survey will be performed in spring of 1995 (e.g. April). Those areas which have been successfully treated and any areas requiting additional treatment will be noted on the base . map of the Channel. II. TMC proposes to prepare quarterly reports to document the results of the vegetation sampling surveys. A. Upon completion of each quarterly sampling survey TMC will prepare three quarterly reports (one for each of the three reaches). Information to be presented in the reports will include: description of the survey area, sampling methodology, results of the sampling surveys, a discussion of changes in the vegetation relative to the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria, maps and photographs, and copies of field data sheets. The reports will also recommend techniques for control of non-native vegetation which may be present in the Channel and will assess the success of such control techniques following their implementation. B. Each quarterly report will be submitted to the District in a Draft format for review and comment. TMC will meet with the District, as-needed, to discuss any comments and revise the reports. Final reports will be prepared and submitted following consultation with the District. IIT. A T1ViC Senior Biologist will be available, as-needed, to consult with District personnel and/or personnel of regulatory agencies regarding survey methodology, data interpretation, and any other pertinent issues. Consultation with personnel of regulatory agencies will be conducted only at the direction of the District. 14 SEPI'EI,4BER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK 2 ATTACHMENT "A" SCHEDULE I. Field surveys will be completed during the month specified for the respective quarterly surveys (i.e. September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995). It. Draft quarterly reports will be completed and submitted to the District no later than the fifteenth of the following month (i.e. September 1994 survey results to be submitted in Draft report no later than 15 October 1994). Final quarterly reports will be submitted to the District within one week of receipt of the District comments on the Draft reports or within 30 days of submittal of Draft report if no comments are received. 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MUitR CRK 3 A~ iACHMENT "A" NOT-TO-EXCEED COST ESTIMATE FIELD SURVEYS REACH 1 REACH 2 2,575.00 946.00 890.00 490.00 515.00/ 2,575.00 2,575.00 2,575.00~ 275.00/ 890.00 890.00 890.00 795.00 795.00 REACH 3 795.00 490.00 275.00/ 795.00 TOTAL $ 9,186.00/ 11,246.00 $ 3,435.00/ 4,050.00 $ 3 150.00/ 5,670.00 REACI-t 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REPORT PREPARATION SEPT. 94 DEC. 94 MAR. 95 JUN 95 TOTAL & NNV & NNV 1,940.00 320.00/ 1,020.00 2,220.00 $ 5,500.00/ 1.020.00 6.200.00 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 $ 4,500.00/ 900.00 5,080.00 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 $ 4,500.00/ 900.00 5.080.00 CONSULTATION I SEPT. 94 !:; ;DEC. 94 MAR. :95 JUN 95 TOTAL. & NNV 190.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 $ 550.00 70.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 $ 220.00 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 $ 150.00 GRAND TOTAL : SURVEYS PREPARATION :: :: REACH1 : 9,186.00/ 5,500.00/ 550.00 $ 15,236.00/ 11,246.00 6.200.00 17,996.00 REACH2 3,435.00/ 4,500.00/ 220.00 $ g 155.00/ 4.050.00 5,080.00 ~.350.00 REACH 3 : 3 150.00/ 4,500.00/ 150.00 $ 7 800.00/ : : ].670.00 5.080.00 1.900.00 tl~: I 2 The above costs axe based on the following billing rates: Principal $80/hr. Senior Biologist $60/hr. Field Technician $35/hr. Dra'ftsman $35/hr. 14 SEFTEMBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MUR.R CRK ,4 ATTACHMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 !1 12 13 14 15 t6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 FUNDING AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ("DISTRICT"), the CITY OF TEMECULA, ("CITY"), and KEMPER COM~g3NITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ("DEVELOPER"), hereby agree as follows: RECITALS A. In the Spring of 1993, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS ("PERMIT") jointly to DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER after devastating flooding occurred along Murrieta Creek Channel so that DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER could undertake emergency flood protection and remedial/ restorative work along CREEK; and B. As part of PERMIT, a botanical assessment in Murrieta Creek Channel is required; and C. DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER will each contribute toward the cost of a consultant ("CONSULTANT") an amount which will cover the costs botanical assessment of CONSULTA/qT to perform the required on DISTRICT'S, CITY'S and DEVELOPER'S respective reaches of Murrieta Creek Channel; and D. For convenience, the DISTRICT will administer a consulting services agreement on behalf of DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER for CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment. A copy of the consulting services agreement is -1- 1 2 5 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 attached hereto substantially in final form as Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. IT IS THEREFORE, mutually agreed as follows: 1. DISTRICT shall administer a consulting services agreement with CONSULTANT to perform the botanical assessment required as part of PERMIT. 2. CITY has deposited eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00) as an estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on CITY'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, CITY shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse CITY within thirty (30) days. 3. DEVELOPER has deposited nine thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($9,350.00) as an estimate of DEVELOPER'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on DEVELOPER'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, DEVELOPER shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S -2- 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 !3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2a 24 25 26 27 work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse DEVELOPER within thirty (30) days. 4. Each party, as to any claim or liability arising out of any act or omission with references to any work performed by or authority delegated to such party as a result of this agreement, shall save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties and their officers and employees from all liability for death or injury to person, or damage to property, or claim therefor. 5. Any notices sent Or required to be sent to either party shall be mailed to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEF~ECULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive 1995 Market Street Temecula, CA 92590 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 Attn: Ray Casey KEMPER COMMITNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO. 27555 Ynez Road Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Mr. Dennis Chiniaeff 6. This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement shall no~ be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this agreement in its final form. 7. Any waiver by DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER of any breach by the other of any one or more of the terms of this agreement -3- 1 2 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, agreement on RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer the parties hereto have executed this (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) R_TVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTRDL A~D WATER CONSER~FATION DISTR/CT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel Dated ~-,~ ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By Ci'tJ Engineer Dated //- ~ q ~/ APPROVEDAS TO FORM: By City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) KEMPER COb~jNITY DEVELOPMENT, By Title ( NOTARY ) CO -5- EXHIBIT "A" Consulting Services Agreement for Botanical Assessment 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREFJ4ENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ~ND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", and TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC., hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby agree as follows: 1. PROJECT - CONSULTANT shall perform consulting services for the project described as Murrieta Creek Biological P~ssessment for U.S.C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS, Project No. 7-0~0020. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES - CONSULTANT shall furnish tools, equipment, facilities, materials and labor necessary to perform in a complete, skillful and professional manner those consulting services described on Attachment "A" hereto and made a part hereof. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE - CONSULTANT shall commence performance of service upon execution of this Agreement, and shall diligently perform the services for a period of one year after the date of commencement. COMPENSATION - DISTRICT shall pay CONSULTANT for services performed and expenses incurred in accordance with the standard rates set forth on Attachment "B" hereto and made a part hereof. The total amount of compensation paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of forty thousand dollars ($40,000) unless a written amendment to this Agreement is executed by both parties prior to - i - 1 2 5 '7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 15 16 18 19 ,~5 ~8 performance of additional services. 5. PAYMENT - Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT following satisfactory performance of the services as set forth herein and within thirty (30) days after DISTRICT'S receipt of appropriate monthly invoices from CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall keep employee and expense records according to customary accounting methods and such records shall be available for inspection by DISTRICT to verify the invoices of CONSULTANT. All invoices shall itemize charges to conform with the portion(s) of work and estimated costs as set forth on Attachment "B". 6. LICENSES - CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors shall maintain professional licenses required by the laws of the State of California at all times while performing services under this Agreement. 7. PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY - DISTRICT will obtain all rights of entry as may be required to perform the proposed consulting services within and upon privately-owned property. All permits and rights of entry as may be required from any and all affected public entities shall be obtained by CONSULTANT. Sufficient evidence of having obtained such permits and/or rights of entry shall be furnished to DISTRICT by CONSULTANT, prior to initiation of work. CONSULTANT will prosecute the work in such a manner as to minimize public inconvenience and possible hazard, -~d - 2 - 1 2 4 5 6 8. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10. 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 will restore the streets and other work areas to their original condition and former usefulness as soon as practicable. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the protection of public and private property adjacent to the work and shall exercise due caution to avoid damage to such property. NOTICES - Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501-1719 TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of the laws of the State of California requ.iring employers to be insured against liability for worker's compensation and shall comply with such laws during the term of this Agreement. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS - CONSULTANT agrees to and shall indemnify and hold DISTRICT, its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from all claims, actions, damages and liabilities of whatsoever kind and nature arising from death, personal injury, property damage or other cause asserted or, based upon any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, invitees, or any subcontractor of CONSULTANT relating to or in any way - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12. connected with the accomplishment of the work or performF of services under this Agreement, regardless of the existence or degree of fault or negligence on the part of DISTRICT or any officer or employee of said DISTRICT, other than the active negligence of DISTRICT, its officers, employees or agents. As part hereto of the foregoing indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to protect and to defend at its own expense, including attorneys' fees, DISTRICT, its officers, agents and employees from any and all legal action based upon any acts or omissions, as stated hereinabove, by any person or persons. WORK PRODUCT - CONSULTANT shall provide DISTRICT with a minimum of eight (8) original copies of each of the fina] quarterly reports. All drawings, logs and reports shall be and remain the sole property of DISTRICT. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by either CONSULTANT or DISTRICT upon written notice to the other party in the event of substantial failure of performance by the other party or in the event DISTRICT shall elect to abandon or indefinitely postpone the project. In the event DISTRICT abandons or indefinitely postpones the project and gives such notice of termination, DISTRICT shall make payment for all services performed to the date of written notice in a total amount which bears the same ratio to the total maximum fee otherwise payable under this Agreement '- - 4 - 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 24 25 26 27 28 14. II II the services actually performed bear to the total services necessary for performance of this Agreement. ASSIGNMENT - Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof shall be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of DISTRICT. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not engage in nor permit others he may employ to engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of the race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, physical handicap, disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), medical condition, marital status or sex of such personS, in accordance with the provision of California Labor Code Section 1735. - 5 - . 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Agreement is executed on RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWA~DS General Manager-Chief Engineer SCT:mcv agrmt987 09/15/94 (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVEPaIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SF_.2~J~) TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INr By Responsible Officer Printed Name Title Area Code/Phone Number - 6 - Murrieta Creek C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment Prepared for: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street P.O. Box 1033 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 (909) 275-1233 (FAX) 788-9965 Contact: Art Krueger Prepared by: TIERRA MADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 (909) 684-7081 (FAX) 784-5647 Contact: Jack Easton/Michhel Pantoja 31 August 1994 Revised 14 September 1994 Murrieta Creek Riverside County Hood Control and Water Conservation District C.O.E. Emergency Pertnit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment INTRODUCTION Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc. CYMC) proposes to perform a Botanical Assessment of the Mumeta Creek Channel for compliance with the conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (C.O.E.) Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS. The project area (Channel) extends from Hawthorn Street to Old Town Temecula (33,800_+ linear feet) and within this area encompasses the entire channel, from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. The Channel is divided into three distinct reaches as follows: Reach 1: Responsibility of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) - Hawthorn St. to the Temecula Rancho line - 20,100_+ linear feet Reach 2: Responsibihty ofKemper Community Development-Temecula Rancho line to vicinity of Rancho California Road (300+ feet downstream) - 6,500_+ linear feet Reach 3: Responsibility of City of Temecula - vicinity of Rancho California Road to vicinity of Second San Diego Aqueduct - 7,200+ linear feet The proposed Scope of Services consists of field surveys, preparation of quarterly reports (one for each Reach), and as-needed consultation. This proposal includes a detailed estimate of the cost to perform the services for each reach. TMC will account for and separately invoice the District for the respective Reaches of the Channel. SCOPE OF SERVICES I. TMC proposes to collect field data by sampling the vegetation within the Channel. A. Sampling transects will be located at 1,000-foot intervals along the entire length of the Channel. Each transect will be 5.0 feet in width and will extend, perpendicular to the flow line, from the top-of-bank to the top-of-bank. The location of each Wansect will be marked on-site and will be noted on an appropriate base map of the Channel (i.e. scale 1" = 200'), photographs will be taken of each transect. The Wansects will be surveyed as close as possible to the original location for each of the quarterly surveys. A total of 33 transects will be established along the Channel (20 within Reach 1, 7 within Reach 2, and 6 within Reach 3). B. Each sampling transect will be surveyed on a quarterly basis for a total of four surveys during the one-year duration of the Botanical Assessment. Surveys will be .performed in September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995. As there is expected to be only minimal change in species composition and structure between the September and December surveys, the December 1994 survey may consist only of noting changes in site conditions {e.g. vegetation removed b scouting) or may consist of a full sampling effort. The actual survey type to be per~rmed will b~ determined through cot~sultation with the District following the completion of the September survey and through a review of site conditions (e.g. flooding). 14 SI:PTF. MBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CR,K At IACHMENT "A" C. On each transect survey, sampling will be performed to provide information on the species composition and structure per the C.O.E. specified Mitigation Success Criteria. At each 3.0-foot interval along the transect, a point will be projected vertically into the vegetation. Each species intercepted by the point will be recorded, providing a tally of "hits" for each species. The height of marsh, ~parian, and/or mulefat scrub vegetation will be measured at each point. Percent cover and average height for each vegetati6n layer will be calculated from these data. Finally, a list of all additional species within the 5.0-foot wide transect will be made. Transect surveys will be performed by a two- person crew consisting of a Senior Biologist and a Field Technician. D. As part of the first of the quarterly surveys (September 1994), the entire Channel will be surveyed to identify locations of non-native vegetation including those species identified in the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria. The species present will be noted and their distribution will be recorded on the base map of the Channel. Non-native vegetation surveys will be performed by a Field Technician under the direction of a Senior Biologist. E. Following the implementation of techniques to control non-native vegetation, TMC will survey the entire Channel to assess the success of the control techniques. The survey will be performed in spring of 1995 (e.g. April). Those areas which have been successfully treated and any areas requiring additional treatment will be noted on the base. map of the Channel. n'. TMC proposes to prepare quarterly reports to document the results of the vegetation sampling surveys. A. Upon completion of each quarterly sampling survey TMC will prepare three quarterly reports (one for each of the thxee reaches). Information to be presented in the reports will include: description of the survey area, sampling methodology, results of the sampling surveys, a discussion of changes in the vegetation relative to the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria, maps and photographs, and copies of field data sheets. The reports will also recommend techniques for control of non-native vegetation which may be present in the Channel and will assess the success of such control techniques following their implementation. B. Each quarterly report will be submitted to the District in a Draft format for review and comment. TMC will meet with the District, as-needed, to discuss any comments and revise the reports. Final reports will be prepared and submitted following consultation with the District. III. A TMC Senior Biologist will be available, as-needed, to consult with District personnel and/or personnel of regulatory agencies regarding survey methodology, data interpretation, and any other pertinent issues. Consultation with personnel of regulatory agencies will be conducted only at the direction of the District. 14 SI'YII=,IvlIIER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK ATTACHMENT "A" SCHEDULE I. Field surveys will be completed during the month specified for the respective quarterly surveys (i.e. September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995). II. Draft quarterly reports will be completed and submitted to the District no later than the fifteenth of the following month (i.e. September 1994 survey results to be submitted in Draft report no later than 15 October 1994). Final quarterly reports will be submitted to the District within one week of r~eipt of the District comments on the Draft reporU or within 30 days of submittal of Draft report if no comments are received. 14 SF, FTE~BEP, 1994 - RCFCAWCD:MUII.R CI.K 3 A'R'AOHMENT "A" NOT-TO-EXCEED COST ESTIMATE FIELD SURVEYS REACH I 2,575.00 946.00 515.00/ 2,575.00~ REACH 2 890.00 490.00 275.001 890.00 REACH 3 795.00 490.00 275.00/ 795.00 2,575.00 2,575.00 890.00 890.00 795.00 795.00 TOTAL $ 9,186.00/ 11,246.00 $ 3,435.00/ 4,050.00 $ 3 150.00/ ~.670.00 REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REPORT PREPARATION SEPT. 94 I[DEC. 94 MAR. 95 JUN 95 & NNV & NNV 1,940.00 320.00/ 1,020.00 2,220.00 1.020.00 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 900.00 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 900.00 TOTAL $ 5,500.00/ 6.200.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5,080.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5.080.00 CONSULTATION REACH 1 190.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 REACH 2 70.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 REACH 3 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 GRAND TOTAL REACH I 9,186.00/ 5,500.00/ 550.00 ; 11,246.00 6.200.00 REACH'2 3,435.00/ 4,500.00/ 220.00 4,050.00 5,080.00 REACH3 ·: ::~: 3 150.00/ 4,500.00/ 150.00 ,670.00 5,080,00 TOTAL. : $ 550.00 $ 220.00 $150.00 TOTAL;COST $ 15,236.00/ 17~996.00 $ 8 155.00/ ~,350.00 $ 7 800.00/ .9oo.oo '['1/'2: 1 2 Cost if Dec.'94 marvey copJim only of noting changet in s~tt conditlom. The above costs are based on the following billing rates: Principal $80/hr. Senior Biologist $60/hr. Field Technician $35/hr. Draftsman $35/hr. 14 SEPTEMBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK .4 ATTACHMENT 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 26 28 FUNDING AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL i~ND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ("DISTRICT"), the CITY OF TEM_ECULA, ("CITY"), and F~EMPER COI~qLTNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ("DEVELOPER"), hereby agree as follows: RECITALS A. In the Spring of 1993, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS ("PERMIT") jointly to DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER after devastating flooding occurred along Murrieta Creek Channel so that DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER could undertake emergency flood protection and remedial/ restorative work along CREEK; and B. As part of PERMIT, a botanical assessment in Murrieta Creek Channel is C. DISTRICT, toward the cost of required; and CITY and DEVELOPER will each contribute a consultant ("CONSULTANT") an amount which will cover the costs of CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment on DISTRICT'S, CITY'S and DEVELOPER'S respective reaches of Murrieta Creek Channel; and D.- For convenience, the DISTRICT will administer a consulting services agreement on behalf of DISTRICT, CITY and DEVELOPER for CONSULTANT to perform the required botanical assessment. A copy of the consulting services agreement is -1- ! 2 5 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 1? 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 attached hereto substantially in final form as Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. IT IS THEREFORE, mutually agreed as follows: 1. DISTRICT shall administer a consulting services agreement with CONSULTANT to perform the botanical assessment required as part of PERMIT. 2. CITY has deposited eight thousand nine hundred dollars ($8,900.00) as an estimate of CITY'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on CITY'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, CITY shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse CITY within thirty (30) days. 3. DEVELOPER has deposited nine thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($9,350.00) as an estimate of DEVELOPER'S share for cost of CONSULTANT'S work on DEVELOPER'S reach of Murrieta Creek Channel. A final itemized accounting of all costs by CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT within forty-five (45) days after completion of CONSULTANT'S work. Should additional funds be required, DEVELOPER shall pay DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If the deposit exceeds CONSULTANT'S -2- 4 5 6 8 9 10 !l 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 28 work costs, DISTRICT will reimburse DEVELOPER within thirty (30) days 4. Each party, as to any claim or liability arising out any act or omission with references to any work performed by or authority delegated to such party as a result of this agreement, shall save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties and their officers and employees from all liability for death or injury to person, or damage to property, or claim therefor. 5. Any notices sent or required to be sent to either partyM shall be mailed to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEMECULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive 1995 Market Street Temecula, CA 92590 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 Attn: Ray Casey KEMPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO. 27555 Ynez Road Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Mr. Dennis Chiniaeff 6. This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this agreement in its final form. 7. Any waiver by DISTRICT, CITY or DEVELOPER of any breach by the other of any one or more of the terms of this agreement -3- 1 2 4 5 6 8 10 !1 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 25 26 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, agreement on ( to be RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWARDS General Manager-Chief Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel BYDe~t~y/'~/~d~F~=~l Dated the parties hereto have executed this filled in by Clerk of the Board) R/%'ERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL WATER CONSERVATION DISTR/CT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk Of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: eer ) Dated l/~ ~- ~c~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney a~rmt989 9/22/94 CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) KEMPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, CO By Title ( NOTARY ) -5- EXHIBIT "A" Consulting Services Agreement for Botanical Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", and TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, INC., hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby agree as follows: 1. PROJECT - CONSULTANT shall perform consulting services for the project described as Murrieta Creek Biological Assessment for U.S.C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS, Project No. 7-0-0020. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES - CONSULTANT shall furnish tools, equipment, facilities, materials and labor necessary to perform in a complete, skillful and professional manner those consulting services described on Attachment "A" hereto and made a part hereof. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE - CONSULTANT shall commence performance of service upon execution of this Agreement, and shall diligently perform the services for a period of one year after the date of commencement. COMPENSATION - DISTRICT shall pay CONSULTANT for services performed and expenses incurred in accordance with the standard rates set forth on Attachment "B" hereto and made a part hereof. The total amount of compensation paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of forty thousand dollars ($40,000) unless a written amendment to this Agreement is executed by both parties prior to - I - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2~ 24 25 26 27 28 performance of additional services. 5. PAYMENT - Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by DISTRICT following satisfactory performance of the services as set forth herein and within thirty (30) days after DISTRICT'S receipt of appropriate monthly invoices from CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall keep employee and expense records according to customary accounting methods and such records shall be available for inspection by DISTRICT to verify the invoices of CONSULTANT. All invoices shall itemize charges to conform with the portion(s) of work and estimated costs as set forth on Attachment "B". 6. LICENSES CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors shall maintain professional licenses required by the laws of the State of California at all times while performing services under this Agreement. 7. PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY - DISTRICT will obtain all rights of entry as may be required to perform the proposed consulting services within and upon privately-owned property. All permits and rights of entry as may be required from any and all affected public entities shall be obtained by CONSULTANT. Sufficient evidence of having obtained such permits and/or rights of entry shall be furnished to DISTRICT by CONSULTANT, prior to initiation of work. CONSULTANT will prosecute the work in such a manner as to minimize public inconvenience and possible hazard, nd - 2 - l 4 5 6 8. 8 9 10 11 9. 14 15 16 18 19 10. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 will restore the streets and other work areas to their original condition and former usefulness as soon as practicable. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the protection of public and private property adjacent to the work and shall exercise due caution to avoid damage to such property. NOTICES - Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL TIERRAMADRE AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONSULTANTS, INC. 1995 Market Street 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92501-1719 Riverside, CA 92507 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of the laws of the State of California requ.iring employers to be insured against liability for worker's compensation and shall comply with such laws during the term of this Agreement. INDEMNITY.AND HOLD HARMLESS - CONSULTANT agrees to and ~hall indemnify and hold DISTRICT, its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from all claims, actions, damages and liabilities of whatsoever kind and nature arising from death, personal injury, property damage or other cause asserted or, based upon any negligent act or omission of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, invitees, or any subcontractor of CONSULTANT relating to or in any way - 3 - 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 15 14 15 16 18 19 20 24 25 26 12. connected with the accomplishment of the work or perform' of services under this Agreement, regardless of the existence or degree of fault or negligence on the part of DISTRICT or any officer or employee of said DISTRICT, other than the active negligence of DISTRICT, its officers, employees or agents. As part hereto of the foregoing indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to protect and to defend at its own expense, including attorneys' fees, DISTRICT, its officers, agents and employees from any and all legal action based upon any acts or omissions, as stated hereinabove, by any person or persons. WORK PRODUCT - CONSULTANT shall provide DISTRICT with a minimum of eight (8) original copies of each of the fina~ quarterly reports. All drawings, logs and reports shall De and remain the sole property of DISTRICT. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by either CONSULTANT or DISTRICT upon written notice to the other party in the event of substantial failure of performance by the other party or in the event DISTRICT shall elect to abandon or indefinitely postpone the project. In the event DISTRICT abandons or indefinitely postpones the project and gives such notice of termination, DISTRICT shall make payment for all services performed to the date of written notice in a total amount which bears the same ratio to the total maximum fee otherwise payable under this Agreemen~ ~ 1 2 3 13. 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. II II the services actually performed bear to the total services necessary for performance of this Agreement. ASSIGNMENT - Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof shall be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of DISTRICT. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not engage in nor permit others he may employ to engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of the race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, physical handicap, disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), medical condition, marital status or sex of such personS, in accordance with the provision of California Labor Code Section 1735. - 5 - 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 ll 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Agreement is executed on RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDWI~RDS General Manager-Chief Engineer SCT:mcv agrmt987 09/15/94 (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) TIERRAMADRE CONSULTANTS, By Responsible Officer Printed Name Title /Lrea Code/Phone Number INr ' - 6 - Murrieta Creek C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment Prepared for: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street P.O. Box 1033 Riverside, CA 92501-1719 (909) 275-1233 (FAX) 788-9965 Contact: Art Ka'ueger Prepared by: TIERRA MADRE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1159 Iowa Avenue, Suite E Riverside, CA 92507 (909) 684-7081 (FAX) 784-5647 Contact: Jack Easton/Michael Pantoja 31 August 1994 Revised 14 September 1994 Murrieta Creek Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District C.O.E. Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS Proposal for a Botanical Assessment INTRODUCTION Tierra Madre Consultants, Inc. CTMC) proposes to perform a Botanical Assessment of the Murrieta Creek Channel for compliance with the conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (C.O.E.) Emergency Permit No. 93-291-RS. The project area (Channel) extends from Hawthorn Street to Old Town Temecula (33,800_+ linear feet) and within this area encompasses the entire channel, from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. The Channel is divided into three distinct reaches as follows: ReaCh l: Responsibility of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) - Hawthorn St. to the Temecula Rancho line - 20,100_+ linear feet Reach 2: Responsibility of Kemper Community Development - Temecula Rancho line to vicinity of Rancho California Road (:300_+ feet downstream) - 6,500_+ linear feet Reach 3: Responsibility of City of Temecula - vicinity of Rancho California Road to vicinity of Second San Diego Aqueduct - 7,200+ linear feet The proposed Scope of Services consists of field surveys, preparation of quarterly reports (one for each Reach), and as-needed consultation. This proposal includes a detailed estimate of the cost to perform the services for each reach. TMC will account for and separately invoice the District for the respective Reaches of the Channel. SCOPE OF SERVICES I. TMC proposes to collect field data by sampling the vegetation within the Channel. A. Sampling transects will be located at 1,000-foot intervals along the entire length of the Channel. Each transect will be 5.0 feet in width and will extend, perpendicular to the flow line, from the top-of-bank to the top-of-bank. The location of each transect win be marked on-site and will be noted on an appropriate base map of the Channel (i.e. scale 1" = 200'), photographs will be taken of each transect. The transects will be surveyed as close as possible to the original location for each of the quarte~y surveys. A total of 33 transects will be established along the Channel (20 within Reach 1, 7 within Reach 2, and 6 within Reach 3). B. Each sampling transeet will be surveyed on a quarterly basis for a total of four surveys during the one-year duration of the Botanical Assessment. Surveys will be performed in September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995. As there is expected to be only minimal change in species composition and structure between the September and December surveys, the December 1994 survey may consist only of noting changes in site conditions (e.g. vegetation removed by scouring) or, may consist of a full sampling effort. The actual survey type to be performed will be determined through consultation with the District following the completion of the September survey and through a review of site conditions (e.g. flooding). 1 14 SF_PTEaMBE. R 1994 - RCFC&WCD:M URR CRK A'!'FACHMENT "A" C. On each transect survey, sampling will be performed to provide information on the species composition and structure per the C.O.E. specified Mitigation Success Criteria. At each 3.04001 interval along the transect, a point will be projected vertically into the vegetation. Each species intercepted by the point will be recorded, providing a tally of "hits" for each species. The height of marsh, ripman, and/or mulefat scrub vegetation will be measured at each point. Percent cover and average height for each vegetati6n layer will be calculated from these data. Finally, a list of all additional species within the 5.0-foot wide transect will be made. Transect surveys will be performed by a two- person crew consisting of a Senior Biologist and a Field Technician. D. As part of the first of the quarterly surveys (September 1994), the entire Channel will be surveyed to identify locations of non-native vegetation including those species identified in the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria. The species present will be noted and their distribution will be recorded on the base map of the Channel. Non-native vegetation surveys will be performed by a Field Technician under the direction of a Senior Biologist. E. Following the implementation of techniques to control non-native vegetation, TMC will survey the entire Channel to assess the success of the control techniques. The survey will be performed in spring of 1995 (e.g. April). Those areas which have been successfully treated and any areas requiting additional treatment will be noted on the base map of the Channel. II. TMC proposes to prepare quarterly reports to document the results of the vegetation sampling surveys. A. Upon completion of each quarterly sampling survey TMC will prepare three quarterly reports (one for each of the three reaches). Information to be presented in the reports will include: description of the survey area, sampling methodology, results of the sampling surveys, a discussion of changes in the vegetation relative to the C.O.E. Mitigation Success Criteria, maps and photographs, and copies of field data sheets. The reports will also recommend techniques for control of non-native vegetation which may be present in the Channel and will assess the success of such control techniques following their implementation. B. Each quarterly report will be submitted to the District in a Draft format for review and comment. TMC will meet with the District, as-needed, to discuss any comments and revise the reports. Final reports will be prepared and submitted following consultation with the District. rll. A TMC Senior Biologist will be available, as-needed, to consult with District personnel and/or personnel of regulatory agencies regarding survey methodology, data interpretation, and any other pertinent issues. Consultation with personnel of regulatory agencies will be conducted only at the direction of the District. 14 SEFi la~IlIER 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CRK 2 ATTACHMENT "A" SCHEDULE I. Field surveys will be completed during the month specified for the respective quarterly surveys (i.e. September 1994, December 1994, March 1995, and June 1995). II. Draft quarterly reports will be completed and submitted to the District no later than the fifteenth of the following month (i.e. September 1994 survey results to be submitted in Draft report no later than 15 October 1994). Final quarterly reports will be submitted to the District within one week of receipt of the District comments on the Draft reports or within 30 days of submittal of Draft report if no comments are received. 14 $F-PItMBE~ 1994 - RCFC&WCD:MURR CIK 3 ATi'ACHMENT "A" NOT-TO-EXCEED COST ESTIMATE FIELD SURVEYS REACH I 2,575.00 946.00 515.00/ 2,575.001' REACH 2 890.00 490.00 275.00/ 890.00 REACH 3 795.00 2,575.00 2,575.00 890.00 890.00 490.00 275.00/ 795.00 795.00 795.00 REPORT PREPARATION & NNV : & NNV REACH I 1,940.00 320.00/ 1,020.00 2,220.00 1,020.00 REACH 2 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 900.00 REACH 3 1,535.00 320.00/ 900.00 1,745.00 900.00 TOTAL 9,186.00/ 1 ! ,246.00 3,435.00/ 4.050.00 3 150.00/ ~ 7 .6 0.00 TOTAL $ 5,500.00/ 6,200.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5.080.00 $ 4,500.00/ 5.080.00 CONSULTATION REACH I : 190.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 REACH 2 70.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 REACH 3 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 GRAND TOTAL REACH i : 9,186.00/ 5,500.00/ 550.00 I 1,246.00 6.200.00 REACH 2 3,435.00/ 4,500.00/ 220.00 4.050.00 5,080.00 REACH3 ~i 3 150.00/ 4,500.00/ 150.00 :: 2,670.00 5,080.00 ~TOTAL. $ 550.00 $ 220.00 $ 150.00 TOTAL COST $ 15,236.00/ 17,996.00 $ 8 155.00/ ~.350.00 $ 7 800.001 ~.900.00 2 The above costs ate based on the following billing rates: Principal $80/hr. Senior Biologist $60/hr. Field Technician $35/hr. Draftsman $35/hr. 14 $EFFEMBER 1994 - RCFC&WCD;MURR CRK ATTACHMENT ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY 2 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public improvement Bonds in Tract No. 23125-1 PREPARED BY: '~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 23125-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On September 28, 1993, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 23125-1 ,and entered into subdivision agreements with: The Toman Company, Inc. 18002 Skypark Circle irvine, CA 92714 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by INSCO, DICO as follows: Bond No. 136486S in the amount of $639,000 ($451,500, $91,000, and $96,500, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. Bond No. 136486S in the amount of $320,000 ($226,000, $45,500, and $48,500, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. 3. Bond No. 136487S in the amount of $4,212 to cover subdivision monumentation. r:~gdzpt\94\l115\tr2312~l.chg/akc 4. Bond No. 136483S in the amount of $6,300 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees. The Toman Company, Inc. sold the property subsequent to recording the tract map. The new developer for the subdivision is: Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. 12626 High Bluff Drive, #400 San Diego, Ca 92130 The new developer has submitted replacement agreements and securities for the contractual work. The substituted securities are bonds posted by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (AMCAS) and/or The American Insurance Company (AIC) as follows: Bond No. 137648998 (AMCAS in the amount of $319,500) and Bond No. 11133152279 (AIC in the amount of $329,500) for a total amount of $639,000 to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. Bond No. 137648998 (AMCAS in the amount of $160,000) and Bond No. 11133152279 (AIC in the amount of $160,000) for a total amount of 8320,000 to cover labor and materials for street and drainage, and water and sewer improvements. Bond No. 137649018 (AMCAS) in the amount of $4,212 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bond No. 137649004(AMCAS) in the amount of $6,300 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees The contractual eighteen (18) month period for completion of the work under the original agreement (The Toman Company, Inc.) will expire March 28, 1995. It is Staff's recommendation that the new developer (Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc.) be granted an eighteen (18) month construction completion period as set forth in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Section 20*"Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions). The contractual completion date would become May 15, 1996. The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Calle Morita, Via Chapparo, and portions of Via Sabino, De Portola Road, and Butterfield Stage Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map Substitute Public Improvement Bonds (on file) Substitute Agreement (on file) r:~gdrpt\94\l 115\t$~t 1251 NOT TO SCALE ~,~ ~ ' ! TRACT NO. 23125-1 Location Map ITEM 14 CITY MANAGER TD: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133 (located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road) PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development ?~y~Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 24133 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on May 15, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24133 was granted an extension of time together with the "Amendment and Restatement of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract No. 24133contains 80 residential lots and 3 open space lots within 22.23 gross acres. The tract is located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP No. 219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC), Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133: Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Stephen's K-Rat Fee $12,000.00 $32,000.00 $43,348.50 -1- r:\agdrpt\94\1115\24133.agn The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee lAPP) Due prior to Building Permit Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 (attached) The Quimby requirement has been satisfied pursuant to the Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement for the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan and the subsequent dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park. The initial Paloma Del Sol City Park has been completed and was accepted by the City on January 25, 1994. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24133: Faithful Labor & Performance Material Subdivision Monument Street and Drainage $ 490,000 $ 245,000 Water 121,500 60,750 Sewer 139,500 69,750 Survey Monuments 7,600 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3, 4. 5. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Sht 3, Tract Map 24133 Fees and Securities Report RCFCD letter dated September 17, 1993 -2- r:%agdrpt~94%1115%24133 ,agn CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vestino Tract MaD No. 24133 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Condition of ADDroyal Condition No, 26b Due Prior to Grading Permit See Staff Report See Road Department Letter Dated 4112/89, Item 22 Pursuant to Development Agreement Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) See Fire Department Letter Dated 2~24~89 Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- r:\agdrpt\94\1115\24133 .agn TO CORONA KAISER PARKWAy UgA NO. 2413: TO SAN DIEGO VICINITY MAP NoT TO SCALEs I' - 200' SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TRACT NO. 24133 AUGUST. I989 PSOHAS ANO ASSOCIATES t TNE DATA :: '-':::,",~ I CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24133 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 490,000 121,500 139,500 $ 751,000 $ 75,100 $ 17,600 DATE: November15,1994 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ 245,000 60,750 69,750 $ 375,500 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Paid Signal Mitigation Fee - Paid Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A Exempt 32,000,00 2,000,00 N/A T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Ran Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T.B.D. - To be determined $ 184.00 $ 8.00 $ 2,410.00 $ N/A $ 880.00 $ N/A $ 3,482.00 $ 0.00 -4- r:~agdrpt%94\1115\24133.egn KENNETH L. EDWARDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT September 17, 1993 City of Temecula Public Works Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92591 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: RECE!V2" ' SEP S 1993 CITY OF TEMECU LA The Meadows Paloma Del Sol West This letter is sent at the request of Michael A. Tylman of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates. The following referenced tracts are not within the boundaries of the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan. No area developments. drainage plan fees are required for these TRACTS 24131-1, 2, 3&F 24133-1, 2, 3, 5 & F 24134-3 & F 24135-1, 2, 24136-1, 2, Portions of the following tracts are which fees have.been paid. The remainder of are not subject to any fees: TRACTS 24132-1 & F 24133-4 24134-1 Should you have any questions or please feel free to contact me c: Michael A. SK:sl.j skZO917a Tylman, RBF 3&F 3&F __ within the boundaries, for these same tracts & 2 require additional information, at 909/275-1265. ~f~WARD L.' DICKER~O~ .2 Senior Civil Engineer ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2 (located east of Butterfield Stage Road and north of De Portola Road) PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~;/Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 23125-2Amendment No. 2 was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. Tract No. 23125-2 was granted a three (3) year extension of time by the City on February 11,1993, pursuant to Section 66452.6 (a) and an additional two (2) year extension of time by the State pursuant to SB428. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract No. 23125-2 contains 71 residential lots within 19.52 gross acres. The tract is located east of Butterfield Stage Road and north of De Portola Road. This tract is part of the Vail Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP No. 219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 23. The applicant is Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2: Stephen's K-Rat Fee Public Facilities Deposit $38,064.50 $10,000.00 The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2: Flood Control Fee (ADP) Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Not Applicable Due prior to Building Permits Due prior to Building Permits -1 - r:~agdrpt\94\l 115\231252.agn The Parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) will be satisfied with the construction and dedication of a 2.8 acre park within Tract No. 23125-3, prior to the issuance of the 63rd building permit for the overall project. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-2: Faithful Labor & Performance Material Subdivision Monument Street and Drainage ~ 518,000 $ 259,000 Water 138,000 69,000 Sewer 116,000 58,000 Survey Monuments $ 6,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Sheet 2, Tract Map 23125-2 Fees and Securities Report -2- r:\agdrpt\94\1115\231252.agn CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vestina Tract MaD No. 23125-2 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) Library Fees Condition of ADoroyal Condition No. 1 (b) Due Prior to Grading Permit Condition No. 22 (b) Condition No. 20 (b) Letter dated 6/28/88, Item 20 Condition No. 40 (a) Due Prior to Building Permit Condition No. 15 (c) Letter dated 6/22/88 Condition No. 20 (a) Due Prior to Grading Permit Condition No. 3 (b) Due Prior to Building Permit (a) Condition of Approval, Third Extension of Time (dated February 11, 1993) (b) Condition of Approval, Second Extension of Time (dated November 12, 1991) (c) Condition of Approval, Amendment No. 2 (dated October 25, 1988) -3- r:\egdrpt\94\l 115\231252.agn L..d ROAD ,~r j "' 0 giZ '..LNI 0 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 23125-2 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 518,000 138,000 116,000 $ 772,000 $ 77,200 6,000 DATE: November15,1994 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 259,000 69,000 58,000 386,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Bond received Signal Mitigation Fee - Bond received Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A N/A 28,400.00 10,650.00 N/A T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T.B.D. - To be detemqined 172.00 8.00 2,170.00 N/A 300 N/A 2,650.00 0.00 -4- r:\agdrpt%94\l 115\231252.agn ITEM 16 APPROVAi~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Mergerite Road from Winchester Road to Northerly City Limits) PREPARED BY:/~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9~,-' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 161 INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (MARGARITA ROAD FROM WINCHESTER ROAD TO THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMITS) BACKGROUND: Assessment District No. 161-Winchester Properties was formed under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for Assessment District No. 161 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors, As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board of Supervisors. The Board then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a "Notice of Completion". r:\agdrpt\94\1115\margrdad.161 1101/akc The Assessment District contractor has satisfactorily completed Margarita Road from Winchester Road to the Northerly City limits in accordance with County plans, specifications, and standards. The Board of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the Notice of Completion for the public improvements on February 15, 1994. The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field. The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities. The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and acceptance of the street and drainage improvements into the City Maintained-Street System. The portion of Margarita Road within the City Limits was dedicated to the County of Riverside on July 3, 1974, and then accepted by Resolution of the Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only and not for inclusion in the County maintained-road system, said acceptance recorded March 6, 1994. Acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No, 1806. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway improvements are completed through subsequent development activities. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated September 13, 1994 cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent r:~agdrpt\94\1115\rnargrded.161 1101/ekc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A CERTAIN STREET INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (MARGARITA ROAD FROM WINCFIFSTER ROAD TO THE NORTflERLY CITY LIMITS) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Kaiser Aema, a California General Partnership, and Murrieta Hot Springs, a California Corporation, irrevocably dedicated in perpetuity for public road purposes, including public utility and public service purposes, the real property in the County of Riverside, State of California described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", recorded July 3, 1974, as Instrument No. 83317, Official Records, County of Riverside, California; WHEREAS, The Riverside County Board of Supervisors accepted said offer of dedication by Resolution for the purpose of vesting title in the County of Riverside but not as part of the County Maintained-Road System, recorded March 6, 1989 as Instrument No. 68307, Official Records, County of Riverside, California; WHEREAS, The City of Temecula became successors-in-interest to the County of Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WHEREAS, The Assessment District No. 161 contractor has completed the public improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards, and the Board of Supervisors has issued the Notice of Completion for this phase of work; WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Department has requested that the City of Temecula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes; WHEREAS, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work and recommends the acceptance of this street into the City-maintained street system: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counc'~ of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system that street offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City- maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. r:\agdrpt\94H115\margfdad.'161 11011akc EXHIBIT "A" TO liF-~OLUTION NO. 94- Accepting the public street irrevocably dedicated to the County of Riverside, and then accepted for vesting purposes only by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, as indicated on Exhibits "A" and "B", and accepting that portion of subject public street within the City Limits only into the City-maintained street system as described below: A. That portion of the Murrieta Portion of the Temecula Rancho as shown by map of the Temecula Land and Water Company on f~e in Book 8, page 359, records of the County of San Diego, State of California, being also shown upon a map of a Record of Survey on f~e in Book 58, pages 75 through 83, inclusive of Records of Survey, records of the County of Riverside, State of California; A 110.00 foot strip of land over that portion of the Temecula Rancho, the centerline of which is described as follows: Commenc'mg at the southerly terminus of that certain course bearing North 46°05'06" F~t 1087.06 feet in the centerline of Winchester- Temecula Road (60.0 feet wide) as shown on said Record of Survey; thence North 46°05'06" East 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 43o54'54'' West 147.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave easterly, and hay'rag a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 76°18'20" and an arc length of 1598.41 feet; thence North 32o23'26'' East 743.94 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave westerly, and having a radius of 1600.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 75015'57'' and an arc length of 2101.82 feet; thence North 42°52'31" West 1641.77 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave easterly, and having a radius of 2400.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 38°24'16'' and an arc length of 16-8.68 feet; thence North 04 °28' 15' West 1146.22 feet to Point "A" , said point being in a line described as a Division Line and shown upon said Record of Survey, said Point "A" being North 87°32'30'' West 68.45 feet from the intersection of centerline of Elm Street and the Division Line as shown on said-Record of Survey. The sidelines of said strip of land are to be prolonged or shortened so as to terminate in the above-mentioned Division Ume. Included within this strip of right-of-way are Lots "D" and "E" of Parcel Map No. 26852 (PMB 173, Pgs 68-73 Incl) as accepted by the City Council, and Lot "A" of Tract No. 21340-6 CMB 183, Pgs 92-94 Incl) as accepted by the Board of Supervisors. r:\agdrpt\94~ll15\margrdad.161 11011akc EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- Accepting the public street irrevocably dedicated to the County of Riverside, and then accepted for vesting purposes only by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, as indicated on Exhibits "A" and "B", and accepting that portion of subject public street within the City Limits only into the City- maintained street system as described below: A. That portion of the Murrieta Portion of the Temecula Rancho as shown by map of the Temecula Land and Water Company on file in Book 8, page 359, records of the County of San Diego, State of California, being also shown upon a map of a Record of Survey on file in Book 58, pages 75 through 83, inclusive of Records of Survey, records of the County of Riverside, State of California; A 110.00 foot strip of land over that portion of the Temecula Rancho, the centerline of which is described as follows: Commencing at the southerly terminus of that certain course bearing North 46°05'06" East 1087.06 feet in the centerline of Winchester-Temecula Road (60.0 feet wide) as shown on said Record of Survey; thence North 46°05'06'' East 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 43054'54" West 147.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave easterly, and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 76°18'20" and an arc length of 1598.41 feet; thence North 32023'26" East 743.94 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave westerly, and having a radius of 1600.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 75015'57" and an arc length of 2101.82 feet; thence North 42°52'31" West 1641.77 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave easterly, and having a radius of 2400.00 feet; thence northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 38°24'16'' and an arc length of 16-8.68 feet; thence North 04°28'15' West 1146.22 feet to Point "A", said point being in a line described as a Division Line and shown upon said Record of Survey, said Point "A" being North 87o32'30" West 68.45 feet from the intersection of centerline of Elm Street and the Division Line as shown on said Record of Survey. The sidelines of said strip of land are to be prolonged or shortened so as to terminate in the above-mentioned Division Line. Included within this strip of right-of-way are Lots "D" and "E" of Parcel Map No. 26852 (PMB 173, Pgs 68-73 Incl) as accepted by the City Council, and Lot "A" of Tract No. 21340-6 (MB 183, Pgs 92-94 Incl) as accepted by the Board of Supervisors. r:~agdrpt\94\l115\margrdad.161 1101/ekc EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94-, SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - PORTION OF MARGARITA ROAD VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 7Z 2/~4o .~ V,[r/,-Ic~'--/.ES'T~'P' ,~--~/':"~ FROH: TmnsporUtion Dcpt SUBMITTALDATE: September I, 1994 ~) David E. Bashart %. ,,.. SUBECT: NodceofComplcrj. on-S~nUOer~;udisCr~kCha.nnc[Improvcme~u, Pha, s~ IVB, and Impzov~mcnts on Nichola~ Road, A~sessm~nc Disuict 161, T,'m~cula =rc~ i~SCOM~m~rDED z,{o'noN: Th~c u~: Bo~d cx~cut~ ~nd RI~ me ~tt~ch~ 'Nonce of Completion." BACK6RO~: ' By Minut~ Ord~ 4,8 of ~:ob~r ~6, 1993, ~e ~d ent~r~ ~m ~ agr~m:n~ wi~ Com~ci~ Con~ctor~, Inc. ~o ~ns~c~ ~ Ge~dis Cr~ Chmnel Improvcmcnu, Phue IVB, ~d Nichol~ Road Improv~mcn~ in ~e Tcm~ul~ ~. ~c b~d ~mount of the ~n~ct w~ $4,~,~.~. ~c f~ amcnd~ ~n~ct ~mount (~cluding c~gc orders) is ~p~t~ to be ~,10~,~.~, w~ch is .32% gru~ ~ ~e odg~ ~n~ct ~ounL ~ work h~ b~ ~mplet~ ~ ~nform~ wi~ ~c pl~ ~d ~p~ons on Au~t 3, 1994. ~ work was in~ by ~b~ A. Wcbb As~. ~O~ ~S0IOR) post-lr. br, nd fax transmittel memo 76"/1 Dzv~d E. Ba. rnhazt Di~cctor of Transportation k'INANCEAL DATA: cLlU~r=.h'T "Z~A.R COST $ 0 A~kT.. COSTS 0 NET COUNTY COJT $ 0 IN CtrRILENT YEA.K ~FDGE'T: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES/ NO/x SOblCE O1~ FUNDS: A.D. 16~ Bond Procells YESIx NO/ c.A.o. mmo~mm>ATxo~: .AppRO,,,.,-t Date; Ire,. Aim ref. ~,.8 - 10/26/93 ltOll,.k4 I i Our. l/~'v) . A~l~dve O~c~ Sigut~e (~_ MINUTES OF THE BOARD iO~UPER~ISORS on motion of Supervisor LaPson, seconded by Supervisor Buster and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the above matter is approved as recommended. Ayes: Buster, Dunlap, Coniceros , Larson and You ve Noes: None . G reld A oney Absent: Nonc er/ahl ~eput/y September 13 1994 ' Transpo i~n, Recorder' AGENDA NO. Dist: Fiscal D~flce w/No~tce o~ Completion · 93410&~=/Kin/och ITEM 17 CITY MANAGEP~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Final Parcel Map 25212 (located at the Northeast corner of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Liefer Road) PREPARED BY: ~J/~..aymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development <~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council rescind their approval of Final Parcel Map No. 25212 and release the associated Street and Water Improvement bonds. BACKGROUND: Final Parcel Map 25212 was approved by the City Council on February 9, 1993. However, the Developer never recorded the Final Parcel Map. The Developer has requested (see attached letter) that the approval of the Final Parcel Map be rescinded and the associated improvement bonds be released at this time. Final Parcel Map 25212 is a four (4) parcel residential development located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Liefer Road. The subdivision created four one- acre parcels and the Change of Zone No. 5663 allowed a residential dwelling on a one-half acre lot. The development currently has one existing residential dwelling on one of the one- acre parcels and the remaining parcels are undeveloped. Tentative Parcel Map 25212, along with Change of Zone No. 5663, was approved by the City Council on December 11, 1990. An application for a First Extension of Time that was filed on November 9, 1992 that extended the expiration date of the Tentative Parcel Map 25212 to December 11, 1993. Tentative Parcel Map 25212 expired on December 12, 1993. Even though Tentative Parcel Map 25212 has expired, section 66452.6(d) of the 1994 Subdivision Map Act allows for the recordation of a Final Parcel Map after the tentative map has expired. Therefore it is necessary to rescind the City Council's approval of Final Parcel Map No. 25212. -1- r:~agdqn\94\lllS~pm25212 The following bonds were posted for Final Parcel Map No. 25212: Faithful Performance Other Bonds Streets and Drainage $ 49,511 Water 1,500 Sewer 0 Survey Monuments $ 3,500 Labor & Materials $ 24,756 750 0 FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Location Map Copy of Sheet 2 of Final Parcel Map 25212 Copy of Notarized Letter dated October 20, 1994 from Durango Development -2- r.~gdrF.\94~l 115~pm23212 Durango Development Engineering Lic: RCE C044518 27840 Del Rio Road. Surge D Ternecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 695-7227 Fax: (909) 695-7230 Consrdction Lic: Class A 661087 October 20, 1994 Mr. Jim Faul City of Temecula, Engineering Depart. 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 RE: Parcel MaD 25212 - Liefer Road, Temecula Dear Mr. Faul: Pursuant to your request, please find enclosed the original unrecorded mylar drawings for the above-referenced parcel map. As we discussed, due to financial considerations, we no longer desire to record the sub-division and, therefore, to construct the street improvements as was previously required by the City. We would like to request that the City release Durango Development of all obligations, which includes performing street construction and maintaining the improvements. Additionally, Durango Development has maintained bonds over the last year or so for the required street improvements. After consulting with Pat Dolan of our bonding company at Amwest Surety Insurance, it appears that in order to release our bonding liability, they would need a letter from the City of Temecula which releases Durango Development of the necessary bond requirements for the street improvements. The letter would also need to indicate that Durango Development no longer has past, present or future liabilities with the City in reference to this project. Amwest Surety's address is 268 W. Hospitality Lane, Suite 206, San Bernardino, CA 92408. We appreciate, and thank you in advance, for your assistance in this matter. If we may answer any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. "--,Sincerely, Dean S Altschuler Dated Timothy CrYugh ,4d Dated CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Diego OR October 26, 1994 before me, Kathy A. Hagerstrom, Notary Public DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E,G,, 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared Dean S. A'ltschuler NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ".%' COMt,1-'r~033130 ~ IHVSC%UUlSSION EXP~S JULY 27 1998 to be the personOe~ whose nameQeO isz~:r-~ subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/gm,,Ctm~ executed the same in hi~ authorized capacity:(,te~/, and that by hi~ signature~ on the instrument the personae<), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(Ri~ acted, executed the instrument. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ~ INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'FrORNEYqN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER Of PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NA,M6 OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE {1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Rernrnet Ave., P.O, Box 7184 · Canoga parx, CA 91309-7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State Of ~personally known to me - OR - ~roved to me on the basis of satisfacto~ evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. and "" OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ,~NDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER r~ PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) r--~ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ~ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT NUM . R OF PAGES DATE OF D~)CUI~ENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION o 8236 Reinmet Ave,, P,O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT } STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF r---At, j ~18~,~ } p~z~6f~elly known to m~ (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persont~ whose nameqs) is/ae~ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that IS/she/tha,/executed the same in h~/her/ti'~eir authorized capacity(ff~, and that by ~/her~r signature~ on the instrument the person~ or the entitV upon behalf of which ~he person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Srgnature~"~~.~ {This are8 for official notaria/ Sea/) ITEM 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation, Project No. PW94-05 PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the construction of the Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation, Project No. PW94-05 to Paul Gardner Corporation for $26,477.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,647.70 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emption Project. The project includes the installation of traffic signal emergency pre- emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections (see Exhibit A) and vehicle emergency pre-emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. All vehicle mounted pre-emption equipment (emitters) will be removable due to possible vehicle re-asignments. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $43,122.00. Six (6) bids for the project were publicly opened on August 25, 1994 and the results for the base bid are as follows: .. 1. Paul Gardner Corp ................. $26,477.00 2. DBX Inc ........................ $34,573.00 3. TDS Engineering .................. $39,827.00 4. De La Cruz Const., Inc ............. $44,662.00 -1- r:%agdrpt%94\1115~ow94-OS.awdlsh 110394 5. Peek Traffic .................... $44,700.00 6. Superior Signal Service Corp ......... $46,838.00 Paul Gardner Corporation has provided the traffic signal services on three previous Public Works projects in the City. These projects have been the Traffic Signal Modification at Rancho California Road and Front Street (PW94-09), Rancho California Benefit District (PW91 - 03) and the I-15/Rancho California Road ramps (PW91-04). The construction schedule is for 30 working days. Work is expected to begin early December, 1994 and be completed in late January, 1995. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees - Signal Mitigation. Funds are available for the construction contact and contingency amounts of $26,477.00, and $2,647.70 respectively. The total amount of $29,124.70 has been transferred from the Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvement Fund, and has been appropriated in account #210-165-638-5804. -2- r:\egdrpt\94\l 115\pw94-OS.awd/sh 110394 PROJECT NO. PW94.-05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION INSTALLATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROPOSED LOCATIONS -3- r:\agdrpt~94\l I 15\pw94-OS.awdlsh 110394 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW94-05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION INSTALLATION THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 15th day of NOVEMBER, 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and PAUL GARDNER CORPORATION, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94- 05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION INSTALLATION, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PIN94-05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMFTION INSTALLATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW94- 05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION INSTALLATION. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work. in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, CONTRACT CA-1 r:~cip\projects\pw94-O5\contract/ejp equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW94-05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL & VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION INSTALLATION All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACTAMOUNTANDSCHEDULE. CITYagreestopayandCONTRACTORagrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: TWENTY- SIX THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY-SEVEN DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($26,477.00),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed third/(30) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%} of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one- year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip~projects~pw94-OS~contrect/ajp by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shalt be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip~projects~pw94*OS\contract/ajp 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR'semployeesincluded) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. CONTRACT CA-4 r:%cip\projects~pw94-OS\contract/ajp 19. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Roberrs, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects~ow94-OS\contractlajp ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA~~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW94-14, FY94-95 Citywide A.C. Repair Program PREPARED BY: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a contract for Project No. PW94-14, FY94-95 Citywide A.C. Repair Program, to A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $87,401.76. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,740.17 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1994 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for FY94-95 A.C. City wide Repair Program, Project No. PW94-14, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction. The bids were publicly opened on October 6, 1994. This project includes removal and replacement of A.C. streets, A.C, 6" berm, overlays and repairs to overside drains citywide. The engineer's estimate for this project was $150,000. Six bids were received for the project and the results are as follows: Base Bid 1. A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc .............. $87,401.76 2. All American Asphalt .................... 99,747.00 3. Atkinson ........................... 107,844.55 4. Nelson Paving & Sealing ................ 116,516.75 5. Del Rio ............................. 134,467.92 6. Vista Murriete ........................ 174,405.14 -1- r:\agdrpt\94~l 115\pw94-14.ewd/ejp A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc. has performed work similar in scope to the proposed project for other agencies within Southern California. Based on comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc. has been acceptable. The construction schedule is for 45 calendar days. Work is expected to begin in early December, 1994 and be completed by mid January, 1995. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164- 601-5402. The total project amount is $96,141.93 which includes the contract amount of $87,401.76 plus 10% contingency of $8,740.17. Attachments: 1, Contract -2- r:\agdrpt\94~1115~pw94-14.awdlajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW 94-14 FY 94-95 CITY WIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 15th day of November, 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. RN 94-14/FY 94-95 CITY WIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS, insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed .) where specifically referenced in the Ptans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW 94-141FY 94-95 CITY WIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW ~t4- 1--4. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\94-14\contract/ajp completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW 94-141FY 94-95 CITY WIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACTAMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agreesto pay and CONTRACTORagrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: EIGHTY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED ONE DOLLARS and SEVENTY SIX CENTS ($87,401.76),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty-Five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY, Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip~rojects\9drl 4\contract/ajp (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any Dart thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one- year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work, Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000-$75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over S500,O00 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip~projects\94-14~contract/ajp 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR'semployeesincluded) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip~projects\94-14\contract/ajp 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors, All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projects\94-14~contract/ajp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Roberrs, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 r:~cip~orojects~9~-14\contrect/ajp ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER ."'~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW94-17, FY94-95 Street Striping Program PREPARED BY: I~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a contract for Project No. PW94-17, FY94-95 Street Striping Program to I.P.S. Services, Inc. responsible bidder, in the amount of $83,700. 2. Authorize a budget transfer in the amount of $48,700 from Account No. 100-164- 601-5402 to Account No. 100-164-601-5410. BACKGROUND: On September 13, 1994 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for FY94-95 Street Striping Program, Project No. PW94-17,and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. The bids were publicly opened on October 20, 1994. This project includes re-striping of all City maintained stingers twice a year. The construction schedule is for re-striping in December, 1994, and April, 1995. Five bids were received for the project, results of which are as follows: Base Bid 1. IPS .................................. $83,700 2. Safety Striping .......................... 89,950 3. Traffic Operations ........................ 91,945 4. Orange County Striping .................... 95,245 5. PCI, Inc ............................... 118,000 -1- r:\agdr0t~94\1115\pw94-17 .awd/ajp The lowest bidder, I.P.S. Services, has performed work similar in scope to the proposed project for other agencies within Southern California. Based on comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by I.P.S. Services, Inc. has been acceptable. The current budget appropriation ($35,000) represents funds sufficient for the inventory known at the time of the budget preparation. The inventory was updated in conjunction with the preparation of the plans and specifications. The bid amounts reflect this updated inventory. Given that the budgeted appropriation is insufficient, funds must be transferred from another account. Thus, Staff seeks authorization for a transfer of $48,700 from Account No. 100- 164-601-5402. However, in the absence of this increase in the appropriation, the contract amount and scope of work would have to be adjusted to conform with the current $35,000 appropriation. FISCAL IMPACT: Due to savings in the Slurry Seal project, sufficient funds for the requested budget transfer are available in Account No. 100-164-601-5402. AttBchment: 1. Contract r:%agdrpt%94%1115~pw94-17.awd/ejp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW94-17 FY 94-95 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 15th day of November 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and IPS SERVICES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94- 17\FY 94-95 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-17\FY 94-95 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, SpecificatiOns, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-17\FY 94-95 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects~pw94*l 7\CONTRACT/ajp year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: 10. CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000-$75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OFCLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for CONTRACT CA-3 r:%cip~projects~pw94-17\CONTRACT/ajp 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR'semployees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with 8 view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been flied under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw94-17\CONTRACT/ejp 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projects\pw94-17\CONTRACT/ajp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Robe~s, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 r:~cip~projects%pw94-1?~CONTRACT/ejp III. CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECT NO. PW94-17 FY 94-95 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SERVICES A. General The work performed under this Contract shall include the furnishing of all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to perform street striping and pavement markings within the City. All work shall be done in accordance with the current edition of the Standard Specifications. B. Work Orders The Contractor shall not start work in the City until he receives a written work order from the City Engineer, or his assigned staff. The Contractor must have such list in his possession before starting work. The Contractor shall perform only that work listed and will only be compensated for the work listed on the work order. The Contractor shall have the right to accumulate said lists until the contractor has a sufficient amount of work to warrant sending out a crew; however, in no event shall any work be held for more than thirty (30) calendar days. Description of the Work: The work shall consist of the following: Painting reflective centerlines and lane lines. Removing of centerlines or lane lines. 3. Pre-lining. Centerline and Lane StriDes: All centerline and lane stripes shall be applied in accordance with the State of California Traffic Manual, "Painting and Traffic Striping, Pavement Markings and Curb Markings" as follows: 1. Centerlines- Detail 1 2. Lanelines - Detail 8 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TS-1 r:%cip\projects~pw94-17\bidkg Water-Based Paint The Contractor is required to use water-based paint materials pre-mixed reflectorized quick-dry type paint, the following APPLICATION PROCEDURE WILL BE FOLLOWED: Traffic striping and pavement markings shall be applied in one application, at a rate to obtain a minimum wet film thickness of at least fifteen thousandths of an inch (0.015"). The paint shall be applied only when the pavement is dry, the atmospheric temperature is above 50° F., and the relative humidity is below 85%. Painting shall not be attempted when there is fog, a forecast of rain, dust that might settle onto the paint, wind of sufficient strength to blow paint spray onto adjacent areas, or while heavy traffic is present. E. Re-Strioino: All re-striping and re-painting of existing traffic stripes shall coincide with the original paintings, regardless of other more restrictive requirements of these Special Provisions unless otherwise indicated. Removal of Markinas: Removal of markings shall be accomplished by wet sandblasting. Errors made by the Contractor shall be removed at no additional cost to the City. Upon written direction of the City Engineer, pavement markings may be removed by blacking out with black paint. G. Preoaration: It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to insure that prior to any pavement marking that the surface be clear of all debris. H. Traffic Control: The Contractor shall make every effort to assure the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic during his operations. The current edition of the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook", published by Building News, Inc., is herein adopted as the minimum safety guidelines in conjunction with the Traffic Manual issued by the State of California Department of Transportation. Contractor shall not close any street within the City without first obtaining the approval of the City Engineer. I. TERM This Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning November 15, 1994, and ending the 15th day of November, 1995, unless terminated or extended as provided. City reserves the right of option to extend this Contract and to renegotiate rates from y TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TS-2 r:\cip\projects\pw94-17\bidkg to year commencing on the first day of July of each fiscal year. In no event shall this Contract be extended beyond the 15th day of November, 1998. POSSESSION/CONSUMPTION The possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages by contract personnel while engaged in work activities within the public right-of-way or when engaged in activity incidental to the performance of duties associated with this Agreement is expressly prohibited. EMERGENCY CONTACTS The Contractor shall provide the City Engineer with the name and telephone number of a minimum of three (3) responsible management personnel who may be contacted by City Engineer for the purpose of notification according to the provisions of the Agreement. (Unlisted private numbers may be omitted until award of Contract.) Contractor agrees to notify the City immediately both in writing and by telephone in the event any of the below names or contact numbers should change. 1, NAME BUSINESS PHONE PAGER 2. NAME BUSINESS PHONE PAGER 3, NAME BUSINESS PHONE PAGER POSITION HOME PHONE MOBILE PHONE POSITION HOME PHONE MOBILE PHONE POSITION HOME PHONE MOBILE PHONE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TS-3 r:\aip\projects\pw94*lT~bidkg ITEM 2 1 APPROVAL CITY ATI~ORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Supplement No. 002to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. 08-6052, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. 08-6052, I-15/I- 215 CORRIDOR STUDY. BACKGROUND: On March 23, 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-26 approving "Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459 between the State Department of Transportation and the City, The agreement establishes the Federal Funding provisions (Master Agreement). The agreement and the resolution provides for funding future projects by supplemental agreements for individual Faderally Funded Project. The current project, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study has been approved for Federal funding in the amount of $100,000, representing 88.53% eligible costs of the estimated $112,956 total cost, The project is a joint effort by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta, with the City of Temecula as the lead agency. The balance of the local funding in the amount of $12,956 is the responsibility of the two cities, each participating in the amount of $6,478 or 50% of the local share. -1 - r:\agdrpt\94\l 115\F15egrrnt,sup/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded through the grant of $100,000 and the local share of $12,956 with the City of Ternecula being responsible for 50% or $6,478 of that local share. The project is budgeted for this Fiscal Year, Account No. 210-165-633-5802,1-15 Corridor Study (Capital Improvement Project Fund, Public Works Projects). Source of funds for the local share of $6,478 is funded through Development Impact Fees. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-6052 -2- r:\agdrpt\94~l 115\1-15agrmt.sup/ajp RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLF_AIENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL All) PROJECT NO. 08-6052, 1-15/1-215 CORRH)OR STUDY. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, City Council at this regular meeting of March 23rd, 1993 adopted Resolution No. 93-26. WHEREAS, said Resolution approved the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459. WHEREAS, said Resolution provided for supplemental agreements to be adopted by the Council for each individual project which utilizes the Federal Funds. WHEREAS, City has applied for Federal Funds to perform the study on 1-15/I-215 Corridor, Federal Aid Project No. 08-6052. WHEREAS, these funds are available and subject to Program Supplement No. 002 for Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. 08-6052. NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 002 to Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. 08-6052. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of November, 1994. ATTEST: Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk -1- r:\agdrpt%94\1115\1-15agrrnt.suO/ajp [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.94-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November, 1994 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: -2- r:\agdrpt\94\l 115\1-15agrmt.sup/ajp P~OGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 Location: to Project Number: LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT E.A. N~mber: 3R FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-6052 September 8, 1994 08-~-O-TMCA STPLN-5459(004) 08-410434 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency and the State on / / and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: ROUTE 15/215 CORRIDOR STUDY TYPE OF WORK: CORRIDOR STUDY LENGTH: 4.0 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PMASE(S) [X] Preliminary Engineering [ [ ] Construction Engineering [ OF WORK ] Right-of-Way ] Construction [ ] ~stimated Cost[ Federal Funds Matching Funds 112956 33D $ 10000~ $ Local12956 $ OTHER $ 0 $ OTHER 0 CITY OF T~MECULA STATE OF CALIFOR/~IA Department of Transportation By By DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 Date Date Attest Title I hereby Certify upon my personal kn~ledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: -.' ChapterI Statutes [ Its ~ Yea~ 139 199z, 2660 - 101 - 890 9& - 95 Program ]Be] Fund Source 20.30.010.810 C 2620~,0 892-F 100000.00 Page 1 of 2 08- ~\~-0-T~CA DATE: 09/08/94 STPLN-5459(004) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili- zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 P~OGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 to LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT OR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-6052 Date: Location: Project N-mher: E.A. ~tmher: September 8, 1994 08-~\~-0- TMCA STPLN-5459(004) 08-410434 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency and the State on / / and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: ROUTE 15/215CORRIDOR STUDY TYPE OF WORK: CORRIDOR STUDY LENGTH: 4.0 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) [X] Preliminary Engineering [ [ ] Construction Engineering [ OF WORK ] Right-of-Way ] Construction [ ] Estimated Cost~ Federal Funds Matching Funds 112956 33D $ $ 10000G $ Local12956 $ OTHER 0 $ OTHER CITY OF TEME6~LA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 Date Date Attest Title I hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: =' ChapterI StatutesI Item ~ Ye~,~ 139 199z, 2660-101-890 Program IScl Fund Source 20.30.010.810 C 2620~,0 892-F 100000.00 AMOUNT 100000.00 Page 1 of 2 08-~\~-0-TMCA DATE: 09/08/94 STPLN-5459(004) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili- zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 ITEM 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Educational Radar Trailer Display Unit PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of an Educational Radar Trailer Display Unit in the amount of $10,400. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division of the Public Works Department, and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has been reviewing Neighborhood Traffic Safety Programs throughout Southern California. The Commission feels that the City of Temecula should actively pursue the development of a program to educate our citizens and visitors to safe traveling practices and the benefits they afford. A major component to all effective neighborhood safety awareness programs is the Educational Radar Display Unit. This equipment is comprised of a radar speed detector, 12" numeric display, posted speed sign, solar power panel, and anti-theft locks and alarms. tt has the capability of displaying actual vehicle speeds, along with the corresponding tone, to notify drivers of their speeds while driving public streets. Studies have found that drivers negotiating the same route repetitively, tend to ignore their speedometers. Also, citizens sometimes perceive vehicles passing their residence as traveling too fast for conditions. In both cases this display unit will accurately educate both the motorist and the resident to help ensure safe driving behaviors. The Traffic Division pursued financing a Neighborhood Safety Awareness Program through the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). The funds were granted and currently budgeted for that purpose. FISCAL IMPACT: Public Works Equipment Account Number 100-164-602-5610currently has adequate funds available for the purchase of the Educational Radar Trailer Display Unit. r:~gdrpt\94~l 115~rsd~rff~.aSn/ajp ITEM 23 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAiy~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicek, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Lot Line Adjustment and Easements for Rancho California Water District (R.C.W.D.) Well Site No. 216 - Rancho California Sports Park PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve Lot Line Adjustment No, PA93-147 and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. Approve the Corporation Grant Deeds exchanging property between the City and R.C.W.D. and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. Approve the Grant of Easement to R.C.W.D. for Permanent Access and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. Approve the Grant of Easement to R.C.W.D. for Drainage purposes only and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. DISCUSSION: While preparing improvement plans to upgrade Well Site No. 216, which is located at Margarita Road adjacent at the Sports Park, Rancho California Water District (R.C.W.D.) determined that some of their existing facilities had been constructed upon what was County property. This property has since been dedicated to and accepted by the City. R.C.W.D. has proposed that the property lines be adjusted such that they encompass the existing well site facilities. The adjustment of the property lines would entail an exchange of land between R.C.W.D. and the City. The City will receive two triangular parcels totaling 5,805 sq. ft. in exchange for granting a rectangular parcel totaling 2,185 sq. ft. to R.C.W.D. Although the two parcels are not adjacent to each other, the addition of the parcels and their subsequent landscaping will enhance the overall appearance of the proposed Rancho California Sports Park improvements. -1- pw13~d~\94\l 115~dlla .em~ To adjust the property lines and enable each owner to use the properties as intended, a sequence of events must take place. First, the executed lot line adjustment will need to be recorded at the County Recorder's Office to allow the parties to record the Corporation Grant Deeds and exchange the properties. After the Corporation Grant Deeds have been recorded, the grant easements to R.C.W.D. for access and drainage can be recorded. These easements are required so that R.C.W.D. may continue to use the property that they have deeded to the City for the purposes defined in the easement documents. The documents have been reviewed as to form by the City's Attorney and are available for rewiew in the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is associated with the execution of the attached documents. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A" -2- pwl3~aidq~\~4\l 115~wdlla.eml EXHIBIT "A" Rancho Vista Road Drainage Easement to R.C.W.D. P~o~-y g~,i~d ~o ~.~ Well Site City by R.C.W.D. Pro~rty gmt to ~ X x ' R.C.W.D. by fl~e City / Access Easement [o R.C.W.D. ~ ITEM 24 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager (~,~Shawn D, Nelson, Director of Community Services November 15, 1994 Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-O3CSD Rancho California Water District (R.C.W.D.) - Water Meter Fees PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve and authorize the payment of water meter fees in the amount of $13,972.00 to R.C.W.D. BACKGROUND: The City Council authorized the Mayor to execute the Water System Construction Agreement and an Agency Agreement with R.C.W.D. on October 11,1994. The agreements ensure that the District will provide water service to Pala Community Park, The installation of the water main servicing the park site has been completed and has passed inspection. The contractor is now prepared to have the service meters installed. Given the size of the park site, two - 2" meters are required, One meter will provide domestic service and the other will provide service for irrigation purposes. The fee for each two inch meter, including installation and certification of the backflow prevention device is $6,986.00. The total costs for both meters is $13,972.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Meter fees in the amount of $13,972.00 are not included in the construction contract, however, sufficient funds were budgeted for utility services and have been appropriated to the Capital Projects Account for Pala Community Park. This project is being funded through Development Impact Fees. r:~gdrpt\94%1115\rowdmtrs.fee ITEM 25 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL: CITY A]'I'ORNEY FINANCE OFFIC~RU~~ CITY MANAGER City Council/City Manager Anthony EImo, Chief Building Official-/'~ November 15, 1994 Consideration of a Contract Amendment for Weed Abatement Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a contract amendment extending an agreement for professional services for weed abatement with Greg Smith, Smith Tractor Services, to December 31,1994. The total amount of this agreement not to exceed twenty-four thousand (924,000) dollars. DISCUSSION: The Code Enforcement division of the Building and Safety Department accepted the responsibility for conducting the City's weed abatement program from the Riverside County Fire Department. This year, 1994, being the first year of Code Enforcement's involvement, the services of the contractors used during 1993 were retained. As a result of retaining the services of Smith Tractor Services, it is necessary to extend the agreement for professional services with Smith Tractor Services to December 31,1994. Staff performs an initial posting of property requesting property owner abatement of vegetation hazards. Failure of the property owner to abate the vegetation hazards causes staff to utilize the services of abatement contractors, approved by Council, to perform the abatement work. The property owner's are then billed and those with outstanding bills at the end of a billing response period, are assessed for the abatement costs through recordation of a special assessment against their property. Staff has completed it's 1994 weed abatement program. Approximately 950 vacant parcels were posted for hazardous vegetation abatement this year. This number compares to 675 parcels posted during the 1993 program. Budget preparation for this year's program was based on an estimate of program costs from 1993 program data. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-162-999- 5440, no additional funding is requested. V:\TONY%AGENDA~SMITH.SER 11/8/S4 tde EXTENSION OF AGENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (W~,EB ABATEMF~NT) THIS AGIln~rI~NT, made and entered into this of 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a California general law municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and Greg Smith, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant." The parties hemto, based upon the mutual promises and convenants heroin and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Extension of Agreement. This Agreement shall serve as an extension of that certain Agreement dated for reference June 8, 1993, by and between City and Consultant for purposes of weed abatement services. This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 1993, and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 1994. Total mount of this agreement not to exceed twenty-four thousand ($24,000) dollars. 2. All other terms and conditions of that certain Agreement dated June 8, 1993 between the parties hemto shall remain in full force and effect and the same are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth at length herein. IN WITNESS WI-IF~REOF, the parties hemto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized representatives. CI'I'Ir OF 'rFAvlF~ULA, a California general hw municipal corporation A'I'I'P_,ST: Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORNI: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney "Consultant" (signature) (name) (rifl~) (signature) (name) (rifle) ITEM 26 APPROVAL EER~ CITY A'I'FORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECUULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager November 15, 1994 Contract for Professional Services with C. M. Gilliss, Consultant PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement with C. M, "Max" Gilliss to act as a liaison between the City and governmental agencies and special interest groups for a monthly fee of $3,000.00 Appropriate $12,000 in the City Manager's Department consulting line item from the General Fund - Fund Balance. DISCUSSION: On June 14, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract to C. M. "Max" Gilliss in the amount of $8,400. The scope of work for that contract was for Mr, Gilliss to serve as a facilitator between various special districts, governmental agencies, and individual or special interest groups and the City. Mr. Gilliss has specialized knowledge of the Caltrans bureaucracy and established professional relationships with their management personnel which allow staff greater access to decision makers. The City is currently involved in several major projects that require coordination with and approvals from the County and CALTRANS. These projects include the Overland Overcrossing, Winchester and Rancho California Road Bridge improvements, the Pala Road Bridge, the I-15 Corridor Study, and related Assessment District projects. Mr. Gilliss also has assisted the City in pursuing additional grant funding for the projects and has been successful in maintaining threatened existing funding opportunities for the projects. In fact, due to Mr. Gilliss' efforts, the City has maintained a four million dollar grant opportunity for the Pala Road Bridge that the state was considering redirecting to a statewide seismic retrofit property. Mr. Gilliss has also been successful on the City's behalf in resolving major contract issues for the joint Temecula-Murrieta I-15 Corridor Study Committee. City Council Agenda Report Contract for Professional Services with C. M. "Max" Gillis Page Two As a result of the time demands of these two efforts, plus work on the projects listed earlier, Mr. Gilliss has exceeded the 120 hours anticipated in hie original contract. Mr. Gilliss has agreed to accept, however, the contract amount as full and complete payment for this work. Because of the complexity and importance of our major traffic circulation efforts, I feel it is in the City's best interest to retain Mr. Gilliss for the balance of this fiscal year, but at a fixed monthly fee of $3,000, rather than (q0.00 per hour. A portion of these costs are appropriate charges to the capital improvement projects involved and, therefore, will be paid out of our capital improvement budget. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this contract is f/24,000. One-half of this cost will be charged to the appropriate CIP Project. The remaining $12,000 requires an appropriation from the General Fund - Fund Balance to the City Manager's Budget account #001-110-999-5248, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered into this 15~h day of November 1994, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Max Gilliss. a Professional Engineering Consulting Firm ("Consultant"). The parties hemto mutually agree as follows: 1. Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth. 2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described here're. 3. Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant the amount of $3,000.00 per month. This amount will not exceed $24.000 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed 10% of contract amount. Consultant will submit an invoice at the conclusion of actual services performed. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. 4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Manager and Consultant. 5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, mused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. 6. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et sea_. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. 12, NoticeS. Notices shll be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: a. city: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Max Gilliss Max Gilliss, Consultant 25655 Corte Risa Murrieta, CA 92562 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. 14. Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. Consultant shall secure workman's compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's worker's compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. 15. wrinen. Licenses. Consultant warrants that it maintains all necessary licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above CONSULTANT By: Title A'IT~T: CITY OF 'rF_AVlF.~LFLA By: Ronald H. Roberts Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ITEM 27 TO-' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA]i~~ CITY ATTORNEY F/NANCE~)FFIC CITY/VIA AGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Summary Vacation of an existing forty (40) foot access opening fronting on Ynez Road between Solaria Way and Rancho California Road on Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 23496 and Acceptance of new access opening. PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development  /Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXISTING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS FOR PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 23496 LOCATED ON YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD Approve the new location of the access opening in substantially the location described as "Opening No. 1" as described on the attachments to this Staff Report and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access opening. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. BACKGROUND: The tentative Parcel Map, as approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 4, 1989, provided for a forty (40) foot access opening on Parcel 2 fronting on Ynez Road. The City Council approved Parcel Map No. 23496 on December 18, 1990. The access opening on Ynez Road was offered for dedication and accepted by the public as shown on Parcel Map No. 23496 filed in Book 168, pages 41 through 45 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County. The City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA94-0048, Conditional Use Permit for Rancho Ford Auto Dealership on August 1, 1994. The owner, Eric Gosch, is requesting that the City vacate the existing forty (40) foot access opening. The purpose of this vacation is to relocate the existing access opening approximately one hundred (100) feet northerly due to the site's elevation difference with the existing elevation of Ynez Road. The City Council should approve the new locations of the access openings and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access openings. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. FISCAL IMPACT: None, ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A and B" 2. Descriptions of the new access opening described as Opening No. I I~FsOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIff. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMF_.CULA, C.AI.H~ORNIA, SUMMA~H-Y VACATING AN F_3~.~TING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTrERS RIGHTS FOR PARCEL 2 OF PARC~..L MAP 2M~ LOCATED ON YNEZ ROAD BETW!~.k'N SOLANA WAY AND RANClIO C,~LwORNIA ROAD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HERF~RY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: S~fion l. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a. The "Owner's Statement* of Parcel Map 23496 provides for the dedication of certain property in the Tract for street and public utility purposes (known as *Ynez Road'). b. The Owner's Statement further provides that the Owner will have no rights of access to Ynez Road, except for the general right of travel, and specifically excepts therefrom *one adjacent (452.20) font access opening for Parcel Number 2 as shown* on the Parcel Map (hereinafter referred to as ' Access Opening for Parcel 2 *). The legal descriptions of said Access Opening for Parcel 2 is set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. c. The Owner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23496 (hereinafter "Owner") now desires to relocate the Access Opening for Parcel 2 by creating a new access opening on Parcel 2. d. The City desires to effectuate the intention of the Owner by vacating the Access Opening for Parcel 2 and accept the relocated access opening for Parcel 2. e. Streets and Highways Cede Section 8333 provides the authority for the City Council to sumrnaffiy vacate an access easement if the easement has been superseded by relocation and there are no other public facilities located within the easement. L The Access Opening for Parcel 2 contain no public facilities and said access easements are no longer necessary because the access opening will be relocated to other portions of Parcel Map 23496 as a condition of this vacation. Section 2. The Access Opening for Parcel 2, as legally described on Exhibit A, are hereby vacated and shall no longer constitute an easement or right of way or other interest in real property of the City of Temecula and shall revert to the Owner. This vacation is subject to the condition, and this Resolution shall not be recorded, un~] such time as the City Engineer has accepted and approved a document to be recorded concurrently with this Resolution relocating the Access Opening for Parcel 2 to an alternate location on Parcel Map 23496 as approved by separate action of the City Council. ~ The City Clerk Shall c~'tify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 15th day of November, 1994. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] pw0$~,dzptX~4Xl I 15%~.vsc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecttla at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of November, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENY: ABSTAIN: COUNCn.MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek City Clerk EXHIBIT 'A' SUMMARY VACATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTrER'S RIGHT OF ACCESS (40 FEET WIDE) TO YNEZ ROAD A 40-foot opening in the Southwesterly sideline of Ynez Road adjacent to Pamel 2 of Parcel Map 23496 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on map in Book 168, Pages 41 through 45 of Parcel Maps, Records of said Riverside County. The centerline of said opening intersects the Southeasterly right-of- way line of Ynez Road perpendicularly at the following described location: BEGINNING at the Northeasterly comer of said Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23496, said point being on a curve, concave Northeasterly, with a radial bearing of North 34° 41' 34" East and a radius of 1267.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 00° 53' 55" a distance of 19.87 feet; THENCE South 56° 12' 21" East a distance of 113.40 feet to said center of the abandonment of the previous dedication of restricted abutters right of access. t; OLSE N0, 5007 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94.- SUBJECT SUMMARY VACATION - A PORTION OF YNEZ ROAD (Map Attached) EXHIBIT "B" LEGEND //////// PAR. OWNER: ERiC J. AND GISELA F. GOSCH MARC L. GOSCH AND MARIE GOSCH 150 CARRIAGE CIRCLE HEMET, CA 92545 i'~:. 5::7 Exp. ~ DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW ACCESS OPENING EXHIBIT 'A' DEDICATION OF 40' ACCESS OPENING AND ABANDONMENT OF PREVIOUS DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTI'ER'S RIGHT OF ACCESS A 40-foot opening in the Southwesterly sideline of Ynez Road adjacent to Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23496 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on map in Book 168, Pages 41 through 45 of Parcel Maps, Records of said Riverside County. The centerline of said opening intersects the Southeasterly right-of- way line of Ynez Road perpendicularly at the following described location: BEGINNING at the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23496, said point being on a curve, concave Northeasterly, with a radial bearing of North 34° 41' 34" East and a radius of 1267.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 00° 53' 55" a distance of 19.87 feet; THENCE South 56° 12' 21" East a distance of 20.00 feet to said center of the 40.00 foot access opening. 0LSEN N0. 5007 EXHIBIT "B" IllllllllI LEGEND PER ,~hf ,4NZ~ PER' PA,q. Z OWNER: ERIC ,J. AND GISELA F. GOSCH MARC L. GOSCH AND MARIE GOSCH 150 CARRIAGE CIRCLE HEMET, CA 9254.5 L, D~4 ITEM 28 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA~.y~ CITY A'ITORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 15, 1994 Summary Vacation of an existing forty (40) foot access opening fronting on Jefferson Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and Buecking Drive on Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 23561-2 and Acceptance of new access openings. PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATi~A:nnie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXISTING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS FOR PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP 23561-2 LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN SANBORN AVENUE AND BUECKING DRIVE Approve the new locations of the access opening in substantially the locations described as "Opening No. 1" and "Opening No. 2" as described on the attachments to this Staff Report and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access openings. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. BACKGROUND: The tentative Parcel Map No. 23561 was approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 26, 1990 provided for a forty (40) foot joint use access opening between Parcels 2 and 3 fronting on Jefferson Avenue. The City Council approved Parcel Map No. 23561-2 on December 4, 1990. The access opening on Jefferson Avenue between Parcels 2 end 3 was offered for dedication and accepted by the public as ahown on Parcel Map No. 23561-2 filed in Book 168, pages 71 through 73 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County. The owner of Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Parcel Map No. 23561-2, Kemper Real Estate Management Company, is requesting that the City vacate the existing forty (40) foot wide joint use access opening along Jefferson Avenue between Parcels 2 and 3. The purpose of this vacation is to provide an alternative forty (40) foot access opening for the sole use of Parcel 2, Access to Parcel 3 would in the form of a joint access opening with Parcel 4. The City Council should approve the new locations of the access openings and authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location which will create the new access openings. The Owner shall prepare an agreement which will quitclaim their existing access rights. The document is subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the recordation of the document. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No, 94- with Exhibits "A and B" 2. Descriptions of the new access openings described as Opening No. I and Opening No. 2. I~-~OLUTION NO. ~ A I~E~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ C1TY OF TEMECULA, C,~I.II~RNIA, SUMMA~rLY VACATING AN EXISTING FORTY (40) FOOT ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABU'FrERS RIGHTS FOR PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARC~,L MAP 23561-2 LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWR~ SANBORN AVENUE AND BUFfICING DRIVE THE CH'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HF_.~FRY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: S~on l. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a. The *Owner's Statement" of Parcel Map 23561-2 provides for the dedication of certain property in the Tract for street and public utility purposes (known as 'Jefferson Avenue"). b. The Owner's Statement further provides that the Owner will have no rights of acce&s to Jefferson Avenue, except for the general fight of Wavel, and specifically excepts therefrom *two adjacent (200 font access openings, one each, for Parcel Number 2 and Number 3, as shown" on the Parcel Map (hereinafter referred to as "Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3"). The legal descriptions of said Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3 is set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. c. The Owner of Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Parcel Map 23561-2 0aereina~er "Owner") now desires to relocate the Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3 by creating a new access opening on Parcel 2 and a new joint access opening for Parcel 3 on Parcels 3 and 4. d. The City desires to effectuate the intention of the Owner by vacating the Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3 and accept the relocated access openings for Parcel 2 and new access openings for Parcels 3 and 4. e. Streets and Highways Code Section 8333 provides the authority for the City Council to summarily vacate an access easement ff the easement has been superseded by reloca~on and them are no other public facilities located within the easement. f. The Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3 contain no public facilities and said access easements are no longer necessary because the access openings will be relocated to other potions of Parcel Map 23561-2 as a condition of this vacation. S~on2. The Access Openings for Parcels 2 and 3, as legally described on Exhibit A, are hereby vacated and shall no longer constitute an easement or right of way or other interest in real property of the City of Temecula and shall revert to the Owner. This vacation is subject to the condition, and this Resolution shall not be recorded, until such time as the City Engineer I~tO~ltlat\94~l 115~jeff~'m.vae STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec-,,In; do hereby certify that the Resolution No, 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of November, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCn.MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- Summarily vacate an existing forty (40) foot access opening on Jefferson Avenue between Sanbern Avenue and Buecking Drive, subject to the associated offer of dedication of alternate access(as) to Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No, 23561-2. (Legal description attached) !n~XildqgX94Xl 115Xj~ffmn.vac EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUMMARY VACATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE) TO JEFFERSON AVENUE Being that portion of Parcels 2 and 3 as shown in Parcel Map 23561- 2, recorded in Book 168, Pages 71-73 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel 3; thence North 48o39'30" West along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 48°39'30' East along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 40.00 feet, to the end of the Jefferson Avenue frontage Vacation of Access Opening and Dedication of Restricted Abutters Rights of Access. D. 6-30-97 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO, 94- SUBJECT SUMMARY VACATION - A PORTION OF JEFFERSON AVENUE (Map Attached) EXHIBIT "B" - MAP VACATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE) L]] 't4- - 05t LD C/L- BUe'C~ZNe - C/L SANBORN AVE. 6F ACe[SS '1~ BE DEDICATED APPLICANT: KEMPER REAL ESTATE MGMT. CO. 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR, STE TEMECULA, CA 92591 CITY OF TEMECULA 120 DESCRIPTION OF NEW ACCESS OPENINGS ATTACHMENTS Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEDICATION OF ACCESS OPENING ANDABANDONMENT OF PREVIOUS DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE) TO JEFFERSON AVENUE OPENING NO. 1 Being that portion of Parcel 2 as shown in Parcel Map 23561-2, recorded in Book 168, Pages 71-73 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; commencing at the most Westerly corner of said Parcel 2; thence South 48039'30" East along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 48°39'30'' East along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 40.00 feet, to the end of the Jefferson Avenue frontage dedication of Access Opening and Abandonment of Previous Dedication of Restricted Abutters Rights of Access. Exit. 6-30-97 EXHIBIT"B" - MAP DEDICATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND ABANDONMENT OF PREVIOUS DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE) OP[:IdlJJG (50) / Exp. 6-30-97 '- ACCESS " RELINGUI~'I4ED PER FARCEL MAP kiZ}. " 'Z~jS&f 'Z , P.M. Bt'mK IA,S, PA&F.5 'H - "T~, AND PER SEPARATE DDCUMEA.rT ~EC~R~)ED ~.M e UR ME XITL~/, C/L SANBORN AVE. APPLICANT: KEMPER REAL ESTATE MGMT. CO. 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR, STE TEMECULA, CA 92591 120 CITY OF TEMECULA ATTACHMENTS Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEDICATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND ABANDONMENT OF PREVIOUS DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE) TO JEFFERSON AVENUE OPENING NO. 2 Being that portion of Parcels 3 and 4 as shown in Parcel Map 23561- 2, recorded in Book 168, Pages 71-73 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel 4; thence North 48039'30" West along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 48°39'30" East along the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Jefferson Avenue, a distance of 40.00 feet, to the end of the Jefferson Avenue frontage dedication of Access Opening and Abandonment of Previous Dedication of Restricted Abutters Rights of Access. EXHIBIT"B" - MAP DEDICATION OF ACCESS OPENING AND ABANDONMENT OF PREVIOUS DEDICATION OF RESTRICTED ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS (40' WIDE)  __ .~ C'/L BU~,C~,Z. NG ~ ~ DRZVE I~ "----- (50) 'm F.~.E \ I ' ~, ~ j'7055 ' 40 DEDICATID~] '~ . - - ' · \--~ ' tj.J ~, ~ /Vl~, x m ~ CO UJ m ~ ~l / \ 1 2 (q ACCESS R)ra14TS R'EUM,GU)St, IED PER PARCEL MAr MQ. tiM. BZ)~ 1~18, PAGES lt-15 AMP PER .~EFARAT; DOCUME)JT I~CA~Z>ED C.~N CURREMTLY. C/L SANBORN AVE. APPLICANT: KEMPER REAL ESTATE MGMT. CO. 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR, STE TEMECULA, CA 92591 120 CITY OF TEMECULA ITEM 29 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planrang November 15, 1994 Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) - A Forty-One Foot, Six Inch High (41'6"), One Hundred Twenty-Two (122) Square Foot Freestanding Freeway Oriented Sign for Toyota of Temecula Valley located on the East Side of Interstate 15 Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063 (APPEAL), UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063,TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-ONE FOOT, SIX INCH HIGH (41'6"}, ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO (122) SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING FREEWAY ORIENTED SIGN FOR TOYOTA OF .TEMECULA VALLEY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15 AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-005. BACKGROUND This item was continued by the City Council at their meeting of October 11, 1994 to their meeting of November 15, 1994. Staff was directed by the Council to contact the auto dealers to determine if there was interest in the previously approved Auto Mall Marquee. Staff mailed a letter to all of the auto dealers dated October 12, 1994, inquiring into the status of the Marquee (reference Attachment No. 3), The auto dealers responded to Staff that there is still an interest in the Marquee. This item is addressed in the current Council Agenda. Staff was also directed to research the conditions of approval for the Marquee in relation to their effect upon individual freeway oriented, freestanding signs for the auto dealerships, Condition of Approval No. 9 for the project required that prior to the issuance of building permits: "All members of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall who chose to advertise on the electronic message board portion of the sign shall submit an agreement with the City of R:\STAFFRPT\6'~PAg/,.CC2 11/7/94, ktb 1 Temecula which will be recorded with the County Recorder. The agreement shall stipulate that all members and future members will forego requesting any additional freeway oriented signage as long as the Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee is erected. The addition of any future advertisers on the electronic message board of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee will cause the agreement to be amended. No additional advertisers will be permitted to be displayed upon the Marquee until the amended agreement is recorded." This condition of approval is in effect until the project expires and would apply to any freeway oriented signage requests brought forward by the Auto dealers. In addition, Staff was directed to apprise the City Council of the status of the approval of the Auto Mall Marquee. Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 and Variance No. 13 (Marquee) was approved by the City Council on August 10, 1993. The project is a proposal for a two (2) sided, seventy-three (73) foot high sign with electronic message board for the Temecula Valley Auto Mall located at the rear portion of Toyota of Temecula (26631 Ynez Road). The approval is effective until August 1 O, 1995, unless an extension of time is filed in compliance with current City Ordinances. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 City Council Staff Report: October 11, 1994 - Page 7 Letter to Auto Dealers Dated: October 12, 1994- Page 8 R:\STAFFRPT\6~PA9~.CC2 11/7/94 ktb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- R:\STAFFRPT\63PA~4.CC2 11/7/94 ktb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063 (APPEAL), UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-ONE FOOT, SIX INCH HIGH (41'6"), ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO (122) SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING FREEWAY ORIRNTED SIGN FOR TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALLEY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15 AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-00& WHEREAS, Toyota of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA94-0063 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA94-0063 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; VerlEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA94-0063 on August 1, 1994 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing, the Commission directed Planning Staff to deny Planning Application No. PA94-0063; WHEREAS, Toyota of Temecula fried Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA94-0063; WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) on October 11, 1994 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, the City Council continued Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) on October 11, 1994 to the meeting of November 15, 1994; R:\STAFFRPT\63PA9~.CC2 11/?/9~ ktb 4 WI~.REAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) on November 15, 1994 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the City Council hearing, the Council denied Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal); NOW, TI~,R!~.iI'ORE, TFW, CITY COUNCIL OF TltF, CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ~ That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The City Council, in denying planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal), makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The project is not consistent with the City's General Plan. The freestanding sign does not provide design excellence in signage, nor does it preserve and enhance the positive qualifies of individual districts. Further, it does not contribute to a streetscape system that provides eohesiveness and enhances community image. 2. The overall development of the land is not designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. To allow each existing business along with future businesses, to erect forty (40) foot high free-standing signs adjacent to Intentate 15 would result in visual blight. To approve projects that would result in visual blight would be conwary to the general welfare of the community. 3. The project does not conform to the logical development of the land and is not compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. Based upon precedent established fwm decisions made by the Cit~ Council and Planning Commission, no signs individual use or center identification signs in this area, along Interstate 15 in excess of thirty feet have been approved. To approve a forty-one foot, six inch (41 '6") high free-standing sign at this location would not conform to the logical development of the land and would be inconsistent with present and future logical development in the area, In addition, the forty-one foot, six inch (41'6") high freeway oriented sign is not compatible with the scale of the buildings that are located on the site. 4. The project is not consistent with current City Ordinances. One freestanding sign is permitted per parcel pursuant to the provisions contained in Section 19.4 of Ordinance No. 348. A six foot high freestanding sign currently exists on site. The project site is on one parcel. The proposal is for an additional freestanding sign on the parcel. Two signs are not permitted under Section 19.4.a.4. of Ordinance No. 348. Section 2. Environmental Compliance, The City of Temecula City Council hereby determines that Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) is a statutory exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (Ct~QA) pursuant to Section 15270 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines. This Exemption states: "CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency R:\3TAFFRPTN6~PA94.CC2 11/1/94 klb 5 rejects or disapproves." Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1994. RON ROBERTS MAYOR A'ff~ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF C;,Ln=ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TIEIVlF, CULA) I WEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of November, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: NOES: ABSENT: CO~CILMItlBERS: CO~CH_JVtEMBERS: CO~CILIVlEVIBERS: JUN'E S. CITY CY-~P,K ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 11, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\63PAgA.CC2 11/7/94 ktb 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TY APPRO~ CI ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning October 11, 1994 Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) - A Forty-One Foot, Six Inch High (41 '6"), One Hundred Twenty-Two (122) Square Foot Freestanding Freeway Oriented Sign for Toyota of Temecula Valley located on the East Side of Interstate 15 Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. ~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063 (APPEAL), UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063,TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-ONE FOOT, SIX INCH HIGH (41'6'), ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO {122) SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING FREEWAY ORIENTED SIGN FOR TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALLEY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15 AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-005. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission directed Staff to deny an approximstely 41 '6" high freeway oriented sign at their August 1, 1994 by a 4-0 vote. Staff requested that the Commission provide direction to deny the sign at approximately 41 '6" in height for two reasons. First, the height of the proposed sign was not consistent with another freeway oriented sign located on the adjacent property to the south (Ynez Car Care Center). The Planning Commission, on May 2, 1994, directed Staff to deny a request for a forty (40) foot high sign at the Ynez Car Care Center, opting to approve a sign between 25 and 30 feet in height. The City Council upheld the Commission's decision on June 28, 1994, approving a sign between 25 and 30 feet in height. This decision, in Staff's opinion, sets a precedent in the area. All of this was explained to the applicant prior to submit'tat; however, they opted to submit the sign at 41 '6" in height. R:\STAFFRPT\63PAg/e. CC 9/~619~. ktb 1 Second, Section 19.4.a .4. of Ordinance No. 348 (Free-Standing Signs) states that not more than one free-standing sign shall be permitted on a parcel of land (Toyota of Temecuia iS located on one parcel). Currently, Toyota of Temecula Valley has a freestanding sign along Ynez Road, and they do not intend to remove it. The exception to the one freestanding sign l~er parcel requirement under Ordinance No. 348 is for a shopping center that has frontage on two or more streets. Toyota of Temecula does not meet the definition of a shopping center as defined in Ordinance No. 348. Since the applicant is currently choosing to construct 8 freeway oriented sign, they will be precluded from advertising upon the Auto Mall Marquee in the event that it is constructed. Should the Auto Mall Marquee be constructed and the applicant wish to advertise on it, they will need to remove the freeway oriented sign prior to advertising on it. As required under the submittal requirements for an appeal, the applicant has submitted reason(s) or rationale to support the appeal. This has been included as A~achment No. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 Planning Commission Staff Report: August 1, 1994- Page 7 Draft Planning Commission Minutes: August 1, 1994- Page 8 Exhibits - Page 9 Appiicant's Reason(s) or Justification to Support the Appeal - Page 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94,- R:\STAFFRPT\63PAg~,CC 9/~./9~ ktb ~ A~FACItld~-NT NO. I RF, qOLUTION NO. 94-, A RESOLUTION OF TFfF~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0063 (APPEAL), UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSXON'S DECISION TO DENY PIANNING AFFI~[CATION NO. PA94-0063, TO AIJOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-OI~E FOOT, SXX INCH HIGH (41'6"), ONE HUNDIzEB TWENTY-TWO (122) SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING FI~k'~.WAY ORIk'~FED SIGN K)R TOYOTA OF TE1VIECULA VALLEY LOCATIff} ON ~ EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 1~ AND KNOWN AS ASSEgSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-1.q}=00~. WHEREAS, Toyota of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA94-0063 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA94-0063 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by Stat~ and local law; ~S, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA94-0063 on August 1, 1994 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time roterested persons had an opporumity to testify edth~ ix', support or opposition; WI~.REAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing, the Commission directed Planning Staff to deny Planning Application No. PA94-0063; WttEREAS, Toyota of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) in accordance with the City of Temecula G~neral Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adoprod by referend; W!~.~, Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Comwi~on proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA94-0063; WHk~I~.~,S, the City Council considered Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) on October 11, 1994 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the City Council hearing, the Council denied Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal); R:\STAFFRPT'~dPAg~.C~ 9/?,6/9~ ktb 4 NOW, TFIERRRORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES R~-gOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS: Section 1. ~ That the Tcmecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The City Council, in denying Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal), malces the following fi/~dingS, tO Wit: 1. The p~oject is not conni~tent with the City's General Plan. The freestanding sign does not provide design =cellence in signage, nor does it preserve and enhance the positive qualifies of individual distrim, Further, it does not contribute to a streetscape system that provides cohesiveness and enhance~ community image. 2. The overall development of the land is not designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. To allow each existing business along with future businesses, to erect forty (40) font high free-standing signs adjacent to Interstate 15 would result in visual blight. To approve projects that would result in visual blight would be contrary to the general welfare of the community. 3. The project does not conform to the logical development of the land and is not compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. Based upon precedent established from decisions made by the City Council and Planning Commission, no signs individual use or center identification signs in this area, along Interstate 15 in excess of thirty feet have been approved. To approve a forty-one font, six inch (41 '6') high free-standing sign at this location would not conform to the logical development of the land and would be inconsistent with present and future logical development in the area. In addition, the forty-one foot, six inch (41'6") high freeway oriented sign is not compatible with the scale of the buildings that are located on the site. Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. The City of Temecula City Council hereby determines that Planning Application No. PA94-0063 (Appeal) is a statutory exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) punuant to Section 15270 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines. This Exemption states: "CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves." Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:\STAFFRPT\63PAg~,.CC 912619~, kLb 5 Section 4. PASSED, AlPROVED AND ADOPTED thLs llth day of October, 1994. RON ROBFATS MAYOR ATIEST: June S. Greedy, City Clerk [SF~] STATE OF CAI.T~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEIvlZF_EULA) I WERERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular roecling .thereof, held on the 1 lth day of October, 1994 by the following vo~e of the Council: CO~CUJvlEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMI~-MBERS: ABSENT: C OUNCILI~MBERS: .TUNE S. CiTY CT,I=~RK R:\STAFFRPT~3PA9~.~:: 9/7.6/96 ktb 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 1, 1994 R:'~T^FFRFT~31'A94.CC 9/26/N k~ 7 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: ~ninThgo~D~or of Planning DATE: August 1, 1994 Planning Application No. 94-0063 - A Forty-One Foot, Six Inch ttigh (41'6'), One Huncited Twenty-Two (122) Square Foot Freestanding Fre~way Orm~md Sign for Toyota of Temeenla V~l|,,y located on the l==~t Side of Interstate 15 Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMM~NDATION: ~ Staff to deny Planning Application No. 94-0063 for a forty-one foot six inch (41 '6") high, one hundred twenty-two (122) squa~ foot freestanding freeway oriented sign for Toyota of Tem~cula Valley BACKGROIJND Planning Application No. 94-0063 was submitted to the Planning Department on July 7 1994. This project is before the Planning Commission because current policy requires Com;n~ssion direction with respect to fre~way oriented signs. Staff is requesting that the Commission provide direction to deny the sign at approximately 41'6" in height for two reasons. First, the height of the sign is not consistent with another fleeway oriented sign that is located on the adjacent property to the south (Ynez Car Care Center). The Planning Comrni~sion denied a request for a forty (40) foot high sign at the Ynez Car Care Center, opting to approve a sign between 25 and 30 feet in height. The City Council upheld the Commission's decision approving a sign between 25 and 30 feet m height. This decision, in Staffs opinion, sets a precedent in the area. All of this was explained to the applicant prior w submittal; however, they have opted to submit the sign at 41'6' in height. Second, Section 19.4.a.4. of 0rdinanc~ No. 348 (Free-Standing Signs) states that not more than one free-standing sign shall be pemitted on a parcel of land ('toyota of Temecula is located on one parcel). Currently, Toyota of Temecula Valley has a freestanding sign along Ynez Road, and they do not intend m remove it. The exception to the one freestanding sign pe~ parcel requirement under Ordinance No. 348 is for a shopping cemer that has frontage on two or more streets. Toyota of Temecuh does not meet the definition of a shopping center as defined in Ordinanc~ No. 348. Should the Commission approve the requested application, they should be aware of Condition of Appwval No. 9 of Plot Plan No. 249 (Temecula Auto Mnll Marquee). A portion of this condition sta~: * ...all members and future members of the Temecula Valley Auto M~11 wig forego requesting any additional fleeway oriented signage as long as the Temecula Valk:y Auw lvfnll Marquee is erected." Since the applicant is currenfiy choosing to consu'uct a freeway oriented sign, they will be precluded from adva'tising upon the Auw Mall Marquee in the event that it is constructed. Should the sign be constructed and the applicant wish w advertise on it, they will need to remove the freeway oriented sign prior w advcrdsing on it. Atuchmcnts: Exhibits - Blue Page 3 a. Site Plan b. Elevations ATI'ACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1. 1994 Commissioner Fahey said she is not in favor of granting an extension of time to the applicant. Chairman Ford said he would like to see the applicant construct the wall with a time schedule. He clarified the Commission's direction would be to enforce the public use permit. 3. Review C8oital Imorovement ProQram (CIP), for Consistency with the General Plan Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to apl}rove staff recommendation and Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 94- 27 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DETERMINING THAT THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S 1994-1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED CITY GENERAL PLAN" The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Salyer Direct Staff to Deny PA94-0063 for A Forty*One Foot Six Inch (41 '6"0} Hiah, One Hundred Twenty-Two (122) Souare Foot Freestandino Freeway Oriented Sion for Toyota of Temecula Valley Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to direct staff to deny Planning Application No. 94-0063 for a forty-one foot six inch (41 '6") high, one hundred twenty-two (122) square foot freestanding freeway oriented sign for Toyota of Temecula Valley Chairman Ford asked if the applicant's existing sign was removed and this sign placed, would staff view the request differently. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan said yes. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Hoagland, Ford PCMIN08/01194 2 09123/94 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Salyer AUGUST 1. 1994 S. Director's Hearine Update Report included in the agenda package. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 6. Plannino Application No. 94-0042. Amendment No, 1 - Public Use Permit Proposed expansion to existing church including sanctuary, a worship/ fellowship hall, administrative space, preschool and day school facility, to be developed in three phases. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Commissioner Hoagland and Chairman Ford expressed concerns regarding adequate parking at build-out of the project. Rev. Lyle Peterson, 29834 Corte Granada, Temecula, representing Hope Lutheran Church, provided background on the Hope Lutheran Church and outlined the proposal. Tim Holt, Chief Architect, 275 N. El Cielo, Palm Springs; talked about the architectural aspects of the project. John Rogers, 27393 Ynez Road, #154. Temecula, project engineer, talked about the engineering aspects of the project. He said Conditions of Approval Nos. 12, 15, 18, 25 refer to a written report requiring mitigated measures outlined in the mitigation monitoring program have been satisfied however, there are conditions imposed by the negative declaration and suggested the Commission delete these four conditions. He also said Condition No. 57 requires the applicant to pay any capital fee imposed on the project including that imposed as mitigation under the E.I.R. Negative Declaration however, they have not been given any conditions. Vince DiDoharp, Alhambra Group Landscape Architects, 28441 Rancho California Road, Suite G, landscape architect for the project, provided an overview of the landscape plan for the project. Mr. DiDoharp cluestipped Condition 11 (a), and said there is a significant amount of large trees on the project and he feels it his responsibility for identifying those trees which should remain on the site. He also expressed a concern regarding Condition 16, which he feels is inappropriate for the location recommended. PCMIN081011)4 3 0gl23/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT\63PA96.CC 9/26/96 kLb 9 CITY OF TE1VIF. CULA CASE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0063 EXITTRIT - A PLANNING COMMIRSION DATE - AUGUST 1, 1994 SITE PLAN R:\FAGANM~.FJ~ORT~',TOYOS~N,PC 7/26/94 mf CITY OF TEMECULA 2!'-4.60" TOYOTA E 5'-8.53' 2'-6.18 41'-6.75" 33'-9.29" B F 3'-6.12" Total 122 Sq. Ft. C~SE NO. - PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0063 EX}rrRIT - B PLANNING COMMYgSION DATE - AUGUST 1, 1994 ELEVATION ATTACHMENT NO. 5 APPLICANT'S REASON(S) OR JUSTIFICATION TO SUPPORT THE APPEAL R:\STAFFRPT~TPAgG.CC; 9/26/~ ktb 10 Reaso~ or 3ust~fication ~o support the appeal: The staff report, prepared by the City Planning Dept., for the Planning Commission, cited two factors as the basis for the nial of the proposed freew~y sign. The first issue dealt with the height of the proposed sign (41'-6'). The report states that a precedent of 25'-30' has been set. There are at this time, signs along the freeway that exceed 30', Norm Reeves Honda and the Texaco Gas station to name two. Since these signs were existing prlor to the approval of the Ynez.Car Care Center" application, precedence has been set, in fact, for taller freeway signs. The second issue refers to section 19.4.a.4. of ordinance no. 348, which states,."...that not more than one free-standing si9n shall be permitted on a parcel of land...~ It appears that there has teen some inconsistency in the past regarding the in- terpretation of this section. Currently, there are approximately nine businesses with what appeers to be two free-standing signs cn the property, one on the frontage road and one on the freeway. This particular property has received approval twice in the past for a freeway sign in addition to the monument along Ynez Road. The first was in January of 1991 by Bedford Properties. The second, was the approval by tne Temecu!a City Council for ~ 73' tall "AUto Canter Message Sign". With the approval of the pro- pose~ Toyota Freeway sign the existing approval for the Auto Cen- ~er sign would become abandoned. The proposed Toyota Freeway sign complies with the city's adcpted code, on freeway oriented signage, sections 19.4.a.l.(a) and 19.4.a.l.(b) of ordinance No. 348. In conclusion, we respectfully request that the Temecula City Ccuncil grant approval of the proposed 41'-6" tall Toyota Freeway sign. Desired action to be taken: To reveise the decision cf the Planning Co~-unission and grant zpproval of.the proposed 122 square foot, 41'-6" over all height (from existing property grade), "~oyota" Freeway sign. ATTACHMENT N0.3 LETTER TO AUTO DEALERS DATED OCTOBER 12, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\6]PA9~.CC2 11/7/9~ ktb 8 Ci_ty of Temecula i'3u's~ness Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 October 12, 1994 (909] 694-1989 · FAX [909) 694-t999 lvlr. Dick Kennedy, General Manager Norm Reeves Super Group 26799 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 SUBJECT: Status of Temecula Auto Mall Marquee Dear Mr. Kennedy: Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2 and Variance No. 13 (Temecma Auto Mall Marquee) were approved by the City Council on August 10, 1993. This approval is effective until August 10, 1995. A letter mailed to the City from the Temecula Au:omobile Dealers Association dated November 19, 1993 states that the Association .dec'-_mes the City's offer for financing of the sign. The City Council, at their October 11, 1994 meeting, directed planni.~g Staff to contact all of the Auto Dealerships in Temecula to determine if there is still an interest in erecting the approved Auto Mall Marquee. Please direct your response to me at 694-6400 within seven days of receipt of this letter. If Staff does not receive a response from you, Staff will assume that you have no further interest in the Auto Mall Marquee at this time. Staff is prepared to work close with the auto dealers should the decision be to move forward on this matter. Please fred enclosed an elevation of the Marquee, as well as the conditions of approval for the project as attachments to this letter. Sincerely, Gary ThOrnhill Director of planning ITEM 30 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE'~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Scott Field, City Attorney Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 15, 1994 Disapproval of Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated Equipment of inland Valley Cablevision, and Ordering a Refund for Excessive Rates RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DISAPPROVING THE CABLE TELEVISION RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OF INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION, AND ORDERING A REFUND FOR EXCESSIVE RATES BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has been granted authority under the 1992 Cable Act to regulate basic tier rates, along with installation and equipment charges for cable operators operating within the City limits. Pursuant to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations, Burke, Willieins & Sorensen, with consulting services from the accounting firm of Diehi, Evans, has reviewed the cable television rates of inland Valley Cablevision for the period of September 1, 1993through July 14, 1994. The attached documentation provides an in-depth explanation of the review process, and describes the conclusions end recommended findings. Inland Valley Cablevision has been provided the appropriate documentation, and has been requested to make a response before the public hearing. FISCAL ANALYSIS: Based on information provided to date, the City's consultants have determined that the cable systems 9,119 subscribers have been overcharged $0.16 per month for basic tier service. Those with remote control and converter boxes were overcharged $0.21 and $0.18 per month, respectively. Projecting a rebate by Inland Valley of approximately $23,000 to subscribers, the City will have to rebate the 5% franchise fee on those lost revenues, totaling approximately $1,200. The City has spent approximately $5,700 doliars to date on attorney and accountant fees to prepare the I~roposed rate rebate for its citizens. R:\EDVALSH\CABLE~REBATE.SRT RESOLIrrION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF TB'E CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DISAPPROVING ~ CABLE TELEVISION RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE Tn~ AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OF INLAND VALLEY CABLRVISION, AND ORDERING A REFUND FOR EXCESSIVE RATES The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows: WI:~,REAS, the City of Temecula ("City") was certified to regulate rates for cable programming services and equipment pursuant to the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; ~S, Western Communication, dba Inland Valley Cablevision ("Inland Valley") holds a franchise to operate a cable television system within the City; WFrRREAS, on or about Januax7 26, 1994, Inland Valley filed its Form 393 with the City seeking approval of its maximum inithl permitted rites for regulated cable programming services and equipment; WttBIEAS, the City has obtained reports dated September 29, 1994 from Burke, Williams & Sorensen and September 21, 1994 from DieM, Evans & Company, analyzing the Form 393 submitted by Inland Valley; W'n'k'XEAS, the City Council has held a public hearing pursuant to Sections 76.935 and 76.935 and 76.942 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations to take written and oral testimony from all interested parries, including Inland Valley, concerning the Form 393 submitted by Inland Valley, the aforementioned repom and Inland Valley's response thereto; and; WRq;XEAS, the City Council has considered the testimony received dumg the public heating and the reports and letter described above; NOW, TITk'rRRFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby resolves, determines and orders as follows: Section 1. The rates and charges for the Basic Services Tier and associated equipment as identified in the FCC Form 393 are hereby disapproved for the reasons and on the grounds contained in the Reports of Burke, Willlama & Sorensen and DieM, Evans & Company, which reports are incorporated into this Resolution by reference as ff fully stated herein. Section 2. This Resolution constitutes a written decision disapproving, in whole or in part, initial rates within the meaning of Section 76.936 of the Rules and Regulations of the Commission. Section 3. The permitted rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment for the period from September 1, 1993 through July 14, 1994 shall be as follows: O 0 o o o O O O O O Basic service tier (23 channels) - $11.66 Hou~y Service Charge - $44.50 Installation of unwired homes - $44.50 Installation of pre-wired homes - $29.82 Installnlion of additional connection at time of initial installation - $11.13 Installation of addtional connection as separate installation - $22.25 New install - underground $ 0.00 Trip charge $ 0.00 Tier change charge $ 0.00 Monthly charge for lease of remote control $ 0.32 Monthly charge of converter box $ 2.34 Section 4. For the period from October 11, 1993 through July 14, 1994, Inland Valley shall refund to subscribers that portion of previously paid basic service tier and equipment rates in excess of the permitted rates established in Section 3 of this Resolution. Inland Valley shall implement the refund no later than 30 days after the date this Resolution is appr0ved by the City Council. Section 5. Inland Valley, in its discretion, my implement the refund required in Section 4 in the following manner. A. By returning overcharges to those subscribers who act~mlly paid the ovemharges, either through direct payment or as a specifically identified credit to those subscribers' bill; or B. By means of a prospective percentage reduction in the rates for the basic service tier or associated equipment to cover the cumulative overcharge. This shall be reflected as a specifically identified, one-time credit on prospective bills to the class of subscribers that eurrentiy subscribe to the cable system. Section 6. All refunds required pursuant to Section 4 shall include interest computed at the same rate as established by the United States Internal Revenue Service for tax refunds and additional tax payments. Section 7. At least ten (10) days prior to implementing any refunds, Inland Valley shall notify the City how it intends to implement the refund order and how it calculated the amount of the refund. Section 8. Inland Valley shall notify the City of the gross amount of the refund owing subscribers and the amount of the refund upon which Inland Valley paid any franchise fee to the City. Within thirty (30) days of receiving the statement from Inland Valley, the City shall refund to In/and Valley that portion of the franchise fee that was paid on refunds made to subscribers. Section 9. The City Council has determined that the maximum rate for the cable programming service tier is $0.507 per channel, or $10.14 for the 20 channels offered on the second tier. However, Inland Valley is charging subscribers $10.37 for the cable programming sen, ice tier. The City lVlmaager is hereby directed to bring this discrepancy to the attention of the FCC for the purpose of determining if subscribers are entitled to a refund on the cable programming service tier. Section 10. Should Inland Valley appeal this rate determination of the City Council of the City of Temecula to the FCC pursuant to Section 76.944 of the Rules and Regulations of the Commission, the City Council does grant an automatic stay of the execution of the refund ordered hereunder. Such stay does not constitute a change in the effective date or implementation date of this Resolution. Nor does such stay, in any way, constitute an endorsement of the rates and charges in effect from September 1, 1993 to July 14, 1994. Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post a copy of this resolution in such place or places as City Notices are normally posted and to make copies to this decision available to the public at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours. Section 12." This resolution shall become effective as of the date of adoption. PASSI~ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at its regular meeting held on the 11 of October, 1994. ATTEST: Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALI~'ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss COUNTY OF TEaMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11 day of October 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: C OUNCH .MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILM~-MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek City Clerk g DEI-E,EVANS &COMPANY |8401 Vt,)N KAKMAN AVE., SUITE IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 9171 S-I 542 PHONE (714) 757-7700 FAX (714} 7~7-2707 September 21, 1994 INDEPENDENT AJZCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON AGREED-UPON LIMITED PROCEDURES REVIEW City Council City of Temecula Temecula, California We have applied certain agreed-upon procedures to the accounting records of Western Communications. Our procedures and findings are noted herein. It is understood that this report is solely for your information and is not to be referred to or distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not a member of City Council or management of the City of Temecula, or an employee or authorized representative of Western Communications. However, if this report is made a matter of public record, its distribution will not be limited. Because the procedures we performed do not constitute an examination in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, we do not express an opinion on any of the accounts or items referred to herein. In connection with these procedures, except as noted herein, no matters came to our attention that caused us to believe that other specified accounts or items should be adjusted. However, had we performed additional procedures, or had we made an examination of the Financial statements of Western Commumcations in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, other matters miglX have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report relates only to the accounts and items specified herein, and does not extend to the financial statements of Western Comnmmcations taken as a whole. Although defalcations and similar irregularities may occasionally be disclosed by this type of engagement, it is not designed for such purpose and should not be relied upon to disclose fraud, should any exist. -1- OTHER OFFICES AT: SUMMARY OF PROCEDURES We applied the following procedures to the accounts and records of Western Communications, hereinafter referred to as "Western": 1. We compared channel line-ups and cable rates of Western as of September 30, 1992 and September 1, 1993. (See Schedule 1). 2. We compared the number of channels and cable rates on the City of Temecula with other selected Southern California cable TV systems. (See Schedule 2). We compared equipment and im'tallation rates for Western with other selected Southern California cable systems, and with average rates from a survey of 147 cable systems compiled by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA). (See Schedule 3). We reviewed FCC Form 393 (as prepared by Western) to determine if the form had been completed accurately and in accordance with FCC regulations and rate rabies. Our review included the following procedures: We agreed key financial and subscriber data on Form 393 to the books and records of Western. Our procedures included a review of charmel cards, a review of sample customer bills, vouching of purchase invoices related to the acquisition of remote controls and converter boxes and a review of Western's worksheets supporting their computation of the hourly service charge and other charges. We recomputed and compared the benchmark channel rates as of September 30, 1992 and 1anuary 3, 1994 (the initial date of regulation) with the rates reported on Form 393. c. We prepared a comprehensive letter to Western management setting forth questionable areas in the computation of Form-393. We had various phone conferences with Western officials regarding these matters. d. We recomputed the maximum permitted per channel rate and the maximum permitted rate for the basic service tier (exclusive of any franchise fee). -2- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS On September 30, 1992, according to Worksheet 2 of the original Form 393, Western offered 36 channels under two tiers for $18.28. Based on our review of the channel card, Western was actually offering 37 channels at September 30, 1992. Also, the actual price for both tiers was $18.74, a $0.46 difference. Western "passes through" the County property tax to subscribers. The FCC Form 393 only permits franchise fees to be passed through to subscribers. Consequently, the property tax of $0.46 should have been added back to the basic tier ram. (See Schedule 1). Accordhag to Worhheet 1 on the original Form 393, Western offered 44 channels under two tiers for $20.29. However, Western's channel card. which listed 45 channels, indicated that no programming was available on two channels. Accordingly, our revised Form 393 reflects 43 channels. Also, the rates on Worksbeet 1 have been adjusted to the actual rate in effect on the "initial date of regulation" plus the $0.46 property tax pass-through. (See Schedule 1 and the discussion at paragraph 5 below). Before adjustments recommended in thin report, the average price per channel for the two tiers decreased only $.01, or 2.0%, from September 30, 1992 to September 1, 1993. Schedule 2 presents a comparison of the number of channels and basic cable rates on the City of Temecula with other selected Southern California Cable TV systems as of September 1, 1993. The City of Temecula's per channel rate of $0.516 and rate of $22.19 for 43 channels is reasonable, and is in line with other Southern California cable systems. 5. In connection with our review of Form 393, we made the following adjustments: a. Worksheet 1, Line I01: On Worksheet 1 of the original Form 393, as fried by Western, the Tier Charge for the Basic Tier was reported as $12.88, and Tier 2 was reported as $7.41. As further explained below, the Basic Tier mount should have been $11.82, and Tier 2 should have be~ $10.37. Under cable regulations issued by the FCC, the "initial date of regulation" is defined as "the date of local notice that the system is subject to regulation". According to 47 CFR Section 76.922Co)(ii)(c)(2), this date is when the City sends a written notice to the cable cable operator that it is certified to regulate rates. Generally, the City also notifies the operator at this time that it has 30 days to complete and forward Form 393 to the City. On January 3, 1994, the City of Temecula sent notice to Western that it was certified by the FCC to regulate basic tier rates. On January 26, 1994, Western forwarded Form 393 to the City of Temecula. The cable rates, number of subscribers, etc. used on Worksheet 1 of Form 393 should have been as of January 3, 1994. -3- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED) 5. (Cominued): a. Worksheet 1, Line 101 (Continued): In reviewing the Form 393 from Western, we noted that the cable rates and number of subscribers used on Worksheet 1 for the "Initial Date of Regulation" were as of a date prior to September 1, 1993. Accordingly, in the revised Form 393, as presented at Schedule 5, the mounts for Worksheet 1 were recomputed using cable rates in effect on or after September 1, 1993, plus the $0.46 property tax pass-through. b. Worksheet I, L'me 104/Worksheet 3, Line 301: On the original Form 393, the amount reported on Worksheet 1, Line 104, was $46,866, and the amount reported on Worksheet 3, Line 301, was $17,717. These amounts .should be substantially the same, as explained below. On November 10, 1993 the FCC issued a "Public Notice" entitled, "Questions and Answers on Completion of FCC Form 393 and Associated Filing Requirements". Question No. 7 dear with amounts to be reported on Lines 104 and 301. The answer to this question stated, in part: "Where operators have restructured equipment rates as of September 1, 1993....we would anticipate that in most cases, absent special circumstances, operators will enter on Line 104 the same, or nearly the same, number on Line 301". Accordingly, in our revised Form 393, we have used $16,509 at both Line 104 and 301. c. Worksheet 1, Lines 121 Through t28: Line 121 The benchmark cable rate is a function of the number of satellites channels in relation to the total of all channels, utilizing a table developed by the FCC. Based on the information supplied by Western, at the date of initial regulation, using a total of 43 channels, 28 of which were satellite, the benchmark calculation would have been $0.524. ~ Line 124 The instructions that accompany the FCC Form 393 calculate the time period factor as "the number of whole months from September 30, 1992 to the date the cable operator submits the FCC Form 393 .~ Therefore, this number varies according to the date of submission of each cable operator's filing. The date of filing was January 26, 1994. The whole months from September 30, 1992 to January 26, 1994 totals 15. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED) 5. (Continued) d. Worksheet 2, Line 220: Line 220 The benchmark cable rote is a function of the number of satellites channels in relation to the total of all channels, utilizing a table developed by the FCC. Based on the information supplied by Western, for September 1992, using a total of 37 channels, 24 of which v~re satellite, the benchmark calculation would have been $0.590. e. Revisions to Cable Rates: Based on the adjustments discussed above, and based on our revised Form 393, as presented at Schedule 5, the ma~im~n permitted rate for the basic service tier should bc decreased from $11.82 ($11.36 as computed by Western, plus $0.46) to $11.66. Recommendation: We suggest that the rate for the basic service tier be reduced from $11.82 to $11.66, retroactive to September 1, 1993. This will result in a rate reduction of $0.16 per subscriber per month. f. Equipment a~d Installation Charges: Noted below is a comparison of the remote control charge, converter box charge and hourly service charge for the City of Temecula with the National average for 147 cable systems (as published by the National Association of Telecommunicatious Officers and Advisors, or NATOA) and with certain other Southern California cable systems. Charge For Remote Hourly ~- Control Converter Service Charge Box Charge City of Temecula (Western) $ .50 $ 2.55 $ 44.50 NationalI Average ~ .25 2.00 27.14 City of Alhambra (Cencom) .12 1.65 20.00 City of Costa Mesa (Copicy/Colony) .27 1.70 38.09 South Orange County (Dimension) .16 1.96 24.00 -5- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED) 5. (Continued) f. Equipment and Installation Charges (Continued): Noted below is a discussion of how Western computed these charges, and our recommended revisions to the charges, where appropriate. Remote Control Charge On Form 393, Schedule C, Western reported a "gross book cost" for remote controls of $21,703 for 2,725 units, or a cost per nnit of $7.96. This amount appears reasonable when compared with 1993 purchase invoices for remote controls. (During 1993, a large number of units were purchased at a unit price of $7.00, plus sales tax and freight.) However, in our opinion, the depreciation charge on the remote controls was not reasonable. The annual depreciation charge on Schedule C was $10,852, or exactly one-half of the total costs of acquisition. This means that Western has depreciated the reinores over two years. An official of Western advised us that the reinores normally are depreciated over five years. A five-year life appears reasonable. Accordingly, in our recomputed Form 393 at Schedule 5, we have used a depreciable life of five years. and a depreciation charge of $4,341. Also, on Form 393, Part 117, Step C, Line 9, our review indicated that the number of maintenance and service hom's related to the remote controls should be 104 hours, rather than 124 hours. (See Schedule 4). As a remit of these adjustments, we recommend that the charge for a remote control be decreased from $0.50 to $0.32. Converter Box Charge On Form 393, Schedule C, Western reported a "gross book cost" for converter boxes of $389,983 for 2,725 units, or a cost per unit of $143.11. A unit price of $143.11 appears excessive when compared with 1993 purchase invoices. (During 1993, most converter boxes were purchased at prices ranging from $116.00 to $120.00, including sales tax and freight.) Also, an official at Western advised us that converter boxes normally are depreciated over 10 years. Accordingly, we made the following adjustments to Schedule C: -6- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED) 5. (Continued) f. Converter Box Charge (Continued): Accumulated Net Book Cost Depreciation Value ROI Current (At 11.25 %) Depreciation As Originally Reported $ 389,983 $ 72,239 $ 317,744 $ 35,746 $ 34,981 (18.5%) 327,000 60,495 266,505 29,982 32,700 (18.5%) As Adjusted (2,725 units at $120.00) Also, on Form 393, Part II't, Step D, Line 16, our review indicated that the number of maintenance and service hours related to the converter boxes should be 312 hours rather than 373 horus. (See Schedule 4). As a remit of these adjustments, we recommend that the charge for a converter box be decreased from $2.55 to $2.34. Hourly Service Charge The hou~y service charge was computed in the following manner by Western: Annual Costs for Maintenance and Installation $129,657 Total Labor Hours 2,912 Hourly Service Charge $ 44.52 In reviewing this calculation, the number of labor hours appeared to be low based on a subscriber count of 8,656. (Please noted that an increase in the number of labor hours would cause a decrease in the hourly service charge.) Upon investigation, we were informed by Western management that Inland Valley Cablevision charges customers only for time that the installation personnel are at the customer's home performing the installation, Travel time and other "overhead" type hours are not included. By contrast, most other cable operators compute the hourly rate, and charge customers, based on an "average cost method" which includes travel and other overhead hours. Also, many other cable operators have a separate "trip charge" in addition to their standard installation charges. (See Schedule 3). If, in fact, Western is charging customers only for hours spent at the customer's home, and not for travel and preparation time, then we agree that the $44.52 rate per hour is reasonable. However, the scope of this engagement did not include a review of actual time charges included on the bills to Temecula subscribers. -7- SUPPORTING SCFI'F~DUI,F,~I SCHEDULE 1 CITY OF TEMECULA COMPARISON OF CHANNEL LINE-UPS AND CABLE RATES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 AND SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 Descri~3tion Seotember 30. 1992 September 1. 1993 C..hannels Pricin~ Channels Pricing Txer 1: Total channels 14 $ 12.31 23 $ 11.82 Price per channel 0.879 0.513 Txer 2: Total channels 23 6.43 20 10.37 Price per ch.nnel 0.279 0.518 Totals for Tier 1 and Tier 2: Total Channels 37 $ 18.74 43 $ 22.19 Price Per Channel $ 0.506 $ 0.516 Unaudited; see rodependent accountants' report. on agreed-upon limited procedures review. -8- SCHEDULE 2 COMPARISON OF CABLE TV RATES FOR VARIOUS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 Basic Tier Second Tier Number Rate Basic Number Rate CPS City of Per Service of Per Service (Cable Operator) Channels Channel Rate Channels Channel Rate City of Temecula (Inland Valley) 23 $ .513 $ 11,82 20 $ .518 $ 10.37 National Avenge 20 .551 11.09 City of Alhambra (Crown- Cencom) 29 .456 13.23 25 .456 11.40 City of Brea (Century) 36 .715 25.75 6 .568 3.41 City of Buena Park (Comcast) 33 .293 9.66 19 .750 14.26 City of Garden Grove (Paragon) City of Lakewood (Colony) 33 .349 11.52 26 .349 9.07 City of Long Beach (CVI) 26 .537 13.95 18 .425 7.65 City of Orange (Cablevision) 21 .534 11.20 20 .534 10.70 City of Paramount (Continental) 21 .406 8.53 27 .505 13.64 South Orange County (Dimension) 28 .523 14.64 16 .506 8.10 City of Yorba Linda (Jones Spacelink) 33 .423 13.96 20 .450 8.99 Unaudite~; see independent accountants' report on agreed-upon limited procedures review. -9- SCHEDULE 2 COMPARISON OF CABLE TV RATES FOR VARIOUS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES (CONTINUED) AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 Total - Both Tiers Number Rate Basic City of Per Plus CPS (Cable Operator) Channels Channel Rate City of Temecula (Inland Valley) National Average City of Alhambra (Crown - Cencom) 43 $ .516 $ 22.19 54 .456 24.63 City of Brea (Century) 42 .694 29.16 City of Buena Park (Comcast) 52 .395 23.92 City of Garden Grove (Paragon) 62 .343 21.25 City ofLakew~od (Colony) 59 .349 20.59 City of Long Beach (CVI) 44 .491 21.60 City of Orange (Cablevision) 41 .534 21.90 City of Paramount (Contmental) 48 .462 22.17 South Orange County (Dimemion) 44 .517 22.74 53 .433 22.95 City of Yorba Linda (Jones Spacelink) Unaudited: see independent accounmnm' report on agreed-upon limited procedures review. -t0- SCHEDULE 3 CITY OF TEMECULA COMPARISON OF EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION RATES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA WITH OTHER CABLE TV SYSTEMS AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 Descrimtion Equipment Charges: City of Temecula City of Lakev~od South Orange (Inland Valley) (Copier/Colony) County (Dimetalon) Hours Amount Hours Amount Hours Amount __ Amoun[s From National Survev (Note 1~ Average Hours Amount Remote control $ .50 $ .19 $ .16 Converter boxes 2.55 1.38 1.96 $ .25 2.00 Installation Charges: Hourly service charge 44.50 31.4~. 24.00 27.14 Unwircd Home - Initial Installation: · Aerial 1.0 44.50 1.3 39.30 1.43 34.34 · Underground 2.33 73.25 1.56 39.96 (Note 2) Prewimd Home .67 29.82 1.0 31.44 .60 14.72 .92 23.29 Additional Outlets: · With initial installation .25 11.13 .8 26.09 .25 9.81 .55 14.01 · Separate installation .50 22.25 1.0 31.44 .55 13.08 .88 22.43 Other Charges: Charge for changing tiers 1.99 2.00 I7.38 Trip charge 26.09 (Note 2) Note 1: These hours and dollar amounts are "averages" from a national survey of 147 cable system. The amount were compiled by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA). Note 2: This information was not available in NATOA~s survey. Unaudited; see independent accountants' report on agreed-upon limited procedures review. -t1- SCHEDULE 4 CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR HOURS 31INE 30, 1993 INIAND V,,~r r ~ CABr, EV~XON slf. a-SC~D-EC~tlIPM!~T Unaudked: see mcicpcndcnt accountants' mpon on a~fced-upon limited procedures review. -t2- SCHEDULE 5 CITY OF TEMECULA FORM 393, AS REVISED BY DIEm,, EVANS AND COMPANY tUNAUDITED) FILE NAME l:\1994~ACCT~f8789FCLWKI FCC ~9~ - PART I REQUEST FOR CABLE RATE APPROVAL COVER SHEET Community Unit Identification Code CA Name of Cable Operator INLAND V,~,I.I_Ey CABLEVISION Mailing Address Date: 21 -- Sep - 94 City State ZIP Code Person to contact regarding this form Telephone Fax Number Local Franchising Authority CITY' OF TEMECULA Mailing Address City ~e ZIP Code This form is being filed with respect to: ~ basic rate regulation ~'~ cable programming ~ervice rate regulation If this form is being filed in response to a complaint about your cable programming service rate~, please attach a copy of the complaint to this cover sheet. The following sections are to be completed after you have filled out the worksheets in PARTS H and III and calcuhted your actual and permitted rate~, FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND EQUIPMENT Promam Service Rate (1) Number of channels in basic service tier (2) Current rate for basic service tier: (do not include any franchise fees) (3) Maximum permitted per channel rate: (from Line 600, Part II) (4) Maximum permitted rate for basic service tier (exclnsive of any fnnchise fee): (multiply (1) by (3) above) 23 $11.82 $0.507 $11.66 :.' Note: If your current rate for the basic service tier (entry 2) exceeds the maximum permitted rate for that tier (entry 4), you must submit a cost-of-service shov.~ng or your basic service rate will be reduced to the mal~num permitted level shown in entry 4. Franchise fees have been excluded from this analysis in order to compare your monthly rate for the basic service tier to the roaMmum permitted level. whether you itemize them or not, any franchise fees you pay for the basic service tier should be added to your monthly rate as part of the service when billing your subscribers. See 47 C.F.R. Section 76,985. EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION RATES Note: Your equipment and installation rates for the basic service tier must not be included in your program service rate for thai tier, but rather must be completely unbundled. In addition, those equipment and installation rates must not exceed your act cos~ including a reasonable profit. The method for unbundiing your equipment and instalhtion rate~ from the basic service programming rate, (if necessary), and for determining your permitted equipment and installation rates, is prescribed in PART II, (unbundling) and PART III (rate-setting) of this form. Enter in the spaces below the rate figures you have calculated in PART III of this form. Your actual basic service equipment and installation charges may not exceed these rates, although they may be lover. (1) Charges for basic service installations* (from Lines 6 or 7 of Equipment and lnstaRation Worksbeet) (a) Hourly rate OR (b) Average installation charges: 1. Instalintion of unwired homes 2. Instalhtionofprewiredhomes 3. Instalhtion of additional connetion at time of initial installation 4. Instalhtion of additional connections requiring separate installntion 5. Other installations (specify) TRIP CHARGE NEW INSTALL-UNDERGROUND Item 3 (2) Charge-for-changing tier~ (i/any) (from Line 29, 30,or 31 of Equipment and InstaBation Worksheet) (3) Monthly charge for lease of remote centrots (from Line 21 in Equipment and Installation Worksheet) Remote control type 1: Remote control type 2: Remote control type 3: (4) Monthly charge for lease of converter boxes ( from Line 14 in Equipment and Installation Work~heet,J Converter box type 1: : Converter box type 2: Converter box type 3: Monthly charge for lease of other equipment (from Line 28 in Equipment and Installation WorksheeO Other equipment (specify) Other 2: AU ttjAL $44.50 $44.52 $44.50 $'!,~.52 $29.82 $29.83 FERMi t t I:D RECOMMENDED $44.50 $44.50 $29,82 $11.13 $11,13 $11,13 $0.00 $O.OOJ $0.00 $0.0o $0.00 $0.oo $o.00 $0.00 $0.oC $0.50 $0,32 $0,32 $2.55 1 $2.34 $2.34 * If you have further charges for additional connections beyond those reflected in your installation charge, attach a sheet explaining your calculations and setting forth those additional charges. SEE Note to Equipment and Installation Worksheet insffuctions in PART HI of this form. FCC FORM 393 - PART III WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION CHARGES Cable Operator Name: Community Unit ID (CUID): INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION Franchise Authority: Date: 21 -Sep-94 CITY OF TEMECULA Line 1. Line 2. 'Line 3. line 4. Line 5. Step A. Hourly Service Charge Annual cost of maintenance and installation of cable radiides and Services (exclude purchase cost of consumer equipment) (Bixt 1 ofSchedulnA + Bc~t 2 of,Schedule B) Customer equipment and installation perenrage (atttch explanation) Annual customer equipment maintennn~e and installation costs, ctcluding cost of leased equipment (line 1 x Line 2) Total labor hours for muintcn=nce and installntion of customer equipment and snrvic= (attach explanation) Hourly service charge (HSC) (Line 3/l=ine 4) $193,517 67.0% $129,657 2,912 $44.62 Line 6. OR Line 7, Step B. Installation charge Uniform HSC for all insta|ladons (insert amount from Line 5) Average charge for instillsdon type (See schedule D for aventSe installation charge calculations) a. Unwired home installation (Schedule D, Line b. Prewired home insUllation(Schedule D, Line2.b) c. Additional COnnection installation at time of initial installation (Schedule D, Line c.2) d. Additional COnnection installation requiring sepnrntn instaRation (Schedule D, Line eL2) c. Other instailations (speulf~. (Schedule D, Line Item 1 Unwircd home instatlation underground Item 2 Item 3 $44.52 Step C. Charges for Licensed Remotes (Calculate separately for each significant different type and attach additional sheets as necessary) Line 8. Annul capital costs (Col. J of Schedule C) Line 9. Total maintenance/service hours (attach ~xpianation) Line 10. Total maintenance/set;vice COst (Line 5 x Line 9) Line 11, Total coSt Of remote (Line 8 + Line Line 12, Number of uuits in service (Col. I of Schedule C) Line 13. Unit cost (Uae 3. Z/Line 12) Line 14, Rate per month (Line 13/12 months) Remote 1 I Remote 2 5,766 t 0 1041 0 4,631 I 0 10,3961 0 2,7251 0 3.8151 0.000 0.3181 0 FCG FORM 393 - PART III, Page 2 Step D. Charges for Leased Converter Boxes tlculate separatley for each significantly differnet type and attach additional sheets as necessary) Line 15. Line 16. Line 17. Line 18. Line 19. Line 20 Line 21 Annual capital costs (Cot. J of Schedule C) Total maintenance/serv~c~ hours (attach explanation) Total maintenance/s~rvice cost (Line J x Line Total cost of converter bc~ (Line 15 4- Line 17) Number of units in serene (Co[. I of Schedule C) Unit cost (Line 18/line Rate per month (Line 20/12 months) Type 1 62,682 312! 13,892 76,574 2,725 28.100 Type 2 0t 01 01 Line 22. Line 23. Line 24.. Line 25, Line 26. Line 27. Line 28. Step E. Chnrgee for Other Leased Equipment Annual capital costs (Col. J of Schedule C) Total maintenance/service hours (attach explanation) Total maintenance/service cost (Line 5 x Line Total cost of converter boa (Line 22 + Line N umber of units in serene or # of subs. (Col. I of Schedn le C) Unit cost (Line 25/Line 26) Rate per month (Line 27/12 months) 01 o 0J o ol o O) 0 Step F. Charges for Changing Service Tiem or Equipment 'he 29. Nomlnui cb~r~c for chingin8 service dcrs OR ,he 30. Uniform HSC for changing service liers (Line 5) OR ILine31, Av~.char~eforchangingsemcetiers(Lin¢5:tAv~.hountochanSetiers) Step G, Franchise Area Monthly Equipment and Installation Costs for Adjustment of Regus.lted Service Line 32. Line33. Line34. Annual customer equipment and installation costs (Line 3 +Bca 3 o{ Scbed. C) Adjustment o[ Line 32 to franchise area level: See instructions Attach explanation of adjustment method. Monthly equipment and instaltation ccet (Line 33/12 months), Enter on Worksheet J, Line 301. 198,104 1 198,104 16,509 FCC FORM 393 - PART III SCHEDULE D AVERAGE INSTALLATION CHARGES C~ble Operator Name: INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION Franchise Authority:, CITY OF TEMECULA Community Unit ID (CURD): Date: 21 -Sep-94 This form is being filed for: Basic Tier Cable Programming Service Unwired Home installation: 1. Average Hours per Installation (attach explanation) 2. Unwired Home instalation Charge (Line a.1 x HSC) Prewired Home Installation: 1. Average Hours per Installation (attach explanation) 2. Prewirad Home instalal~on Charge (Line b.1 x HSC) Additional Connection Installation at Time of Initial installation: 1. Average Hours per Additional Connection (attach explanation) 2. Additional Connection-Initial Instalation Charge (Line c.1 x HSC) Additional Connection Installation al~er Initial Installation: 1, Average Hours per Additional Connection (attach explanaiton) 2. Additional Connection-Separate Instalation Charge (Line d.1 x HSC) Other Installation (by Item Type): Unwired Home Installation: 1. Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation) 2. Item I Instalation Charge (Line e.1 x HSC) Trip Charge 3, Average Hours per Additional installation (attach explanation) 4. Item 2 Instalation Charge (Line e.3 x HSC) 5. Average Hours per Additional Installation (at~,ach explanation) 6. Item 3 Instalation Charge (Line e.5 x HSC) 7. Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation) 8. Item 4 Instalation Charge (Line e.7 x HSC) Note: For HSC (Hourly Service Charge) use amount from Line 5 o[ the Worksheet for Calculating Equipment ~nxt Installation Clargcs (Page 25 of FCC Form 393). 0.67 29.83 0,25 11,13 0.50 22.26 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 FILENAME h\1994.xACCTG\88789fc3 FCC FORM 393 - PART III SCHEDULE A CAPITAL COSTS OF SERVICE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT A B C F.~nipment Gross Book A~cum Depr Vehicles 30,022 16.208 Tooh 6,308 2,614 Maintenance Facility 59,.7.~ 12,022 Drop~ Other 591,480 193365 TOTAL 687.092 2242.09 11.25% G Taxes H D E F Federal State Current i Deferred Net Book Return on Income Income Provision for Total T~txes B-(C+D) lnvestmcnl Tax Tax Depreciation (add 0 ~ 13,814 1,554 0 0 5,752 I 7,306 3,69~ 416 631 ~ 1.047 0 0 47,260 5,317 0 0 3,100 8.417 0 398,115 44,788 56,194 100,982 0 462,883 52,074 0 0 65,677 117,751 Box I SCHEDULE B ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES FOR SERVICE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT (F. zciuding Depreciation) 3 4,64'/q Utilitie~ [ Other Tu~ Other insu~ Other ~ TOT7A~5,7 2,0811 1,313~ 182j 0j 66 B~x 9 A B C Equipment Gro~s Book Aceurn Depr Remote 1 21.703 9,038 Remote 2 Rcmotc 3 Cony. Bent 1 L 327.000 ~ 60.495 Cony. Box2( Conv, Box 3~ Other Other TOTAL 348,703 69,333 SCHEDULE C CAPITAL COSTS OF LEASED CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT Taxes D E F Federal State Deferred Net Book Return on Incom~ Income Taxes B-(C+D) Investmenl Tax Tax 0 12,665 1,425 0 0 266.505 } 29,982 0 0 279,170 ~ 31,407 I H I Current Total # J Provision for of units Total Depreciation in servic~ (add F,G,H) 4a41 I 2,72~ I 5,76~ 32,700 ~ 2,725 ~ 62.682 I o ~ o 37,o4x ] 5,4~o $ e8.448 Box 3 LAW OFFICES BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 3200 PARK CENTER DRIVE SUITE 7SO COSTA Mi;SA, CALIFORNIA ~2626 (714) 546-5659 TELECOPIER: (714) 756-5648 September 29, 1994 Mayor Ron Roberrs and Members of the City Council CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated Equipment of Inland Valley Cablevision Dear Mayor Roberts and City Councilmembers: In 1992, Congress enacted the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act"). One of the principal objectives of the 1992 Cable Act was to regulate cable television rates, which had risen significantly since Congress had deregulated cable rates pursuant in 1984. In order to implement the 1992 Cable Act, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations establishing a "benchmark" system of rate regulation. These initial rate regulations were contained in the FCC's April 1993 First Report and Order, which went into effect on September 1, 1993. Temecula's cable operator, Inland Valley Cablevision, like all other cable operators throughout the nation, instituted a new rate structure on September 1, 1993 in order to comply with the FCC's benchmark rates. Inland Valley Cablevision also filed a rate regulation form with the City, known as the Form 393, so that the City could independently determine if Inland Valley Cablevision's rates complied with the FCC regulations. The benchmark rates represents the rates a cable operator would charge if it were subject to "effective competition." The benchmark system was derived from a nation-wide rate survey the FCC conducted as September 30, 1992. Based on the survey, the FCC concluded that cable rates should be reduced by 10% from their September 30, 1992 levels to account for a lack of effective competition in the cable television industry. ORANGE: 1535.1 September 29, 1994 Page 2 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, with consulting services from the accounting firm of Diehl, Evans, has reviewed the cable television rates contained in Inland Valley's Form 393. The Report of Diehl, Evans is attached. It is our conclusion that Inland Valley Cablevision's rates in Temecula are in excess of the rates permitted pursuant to FCC Regulations, and that a refund is in order. Consequently, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the enclosed Resolution entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Disapproving the Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated Equipment of Inland valley Cablevision, and Ordering a Refund for Excessive Rates." The principal effect of this Resolution is to reduce basic tier cable rates. This means that as a result of rate regulation, since September 30, 1992 basic tier rates have been reduced from $12.31 for 14 channels to $11.66 for 23 channels. I. Backaround Under the 1992 Cable Act, cities are authorized to regulate "basic tier" rates, along with installation and equipment charges. The "basic tier" of cable service includes all broadcast television channels, any public, educational and governmental channels required by the franchise and any other channels the operator choose to carry on the basic tier. Each cable operator is required to offer the basic tier of service. Cable operators may not require ~ubscription to any other tier as a condition of receiving programming offered on a per channel or pay-per-view basis. The 1992 Cable Act further permits subscribers and cities to file complaints with the FCC if they believe rates for the second service tier (known as the cable programming service or "CPS" tier) are unreasonable. The CPS tier typically includes most satellite channels, like CNN, WTBS and Prime Ticket, but excludes premium and pay-per-view channels. September 29, 1994 Page 3 Once Temecula became certified to regulate rates, Inland Valley Cablevision was required to file a rate schedule with the City -- known as a Form 393 -- to obtain City approval of its basic tier rates. Essentially, the Form 393 takes the operator through two steps to establish maximum rates for the basic service tier and for equipment and installation charges. First, the maximum rates for equipment and installation are determined based upon actual cost plus a reasonable profit. These maximum rates are established by determining the capital costs and expenses associated with each type of equipment (e.g. converter boxes, remote controls) and service (e.g., installation for unwired and prewired homes). In particular, an "hourly service charge" is determined. The hourly service charge represents the cable operator's hourly labor rate for performing the various types of installations. For example, if the hourly service charge is $27.14 (the national average) and its takes 1.25 hours to install service at a prewired home, then the maximum service charge for installing service at a prewired house is 1.25 x $27.14 = $33.93. Second, maximum basic service tier rates as established. The Form 393 is designed to squeeze out "monopoly profits" from subscriber rates. To do this , the Form 393 uses a series of worksheets to determine if rates need to be reduced, and by how much. Three factors are used to determine benchmark rates: number of subscribers, number of channels, and number of satellite signals. Then, if the actual cable rates are below the benchmark rates, the current rates become the maximum regulated rates, whichever is less. Mor& recently, the FCC has replaced the Form393 with the Form 1200. This new form was a result of the FCC's March 30, 1994, Second Report and Order, in which the FCC concluded that its original determination that rates should be reduced by an average of 10% was insufficient, and that rates actually should be reduced by approximately 17%. Accordingly, the FCC issued a new Form 1200 and a new set of rate regulations. These regulations went into effect on July 14, 1994, and on that same date, Inland Valley Cablevision, like cable operators throughout the nation, readjusted its rates. ORANGE: 1535.1 September 29, 1994 Page 4 However, instead of setting benchmark rates, Inland chose the option of basing its maximum permitted rate on a cost-of- service showing. The FCC also adopted on March 30, 1994 cost-of- service rate regulations to provide a "safety valve" to cable operators ensuring them compensatory rates if their benchmark rates were too low. The cost-of-service standards were issued as interim regulations pending the outcome of a cost study currently underway at the FCC. Only the cable operator, not the FCC or the City can decide, whether to undertake a cost-of-service showing. Cost-of- service showings must be submitted on FCC Form 1220. Inland submitted its Form 1220 to the City on August 15, 1994. A very brief summary of the impact of rate regulation on Temecula is attached. A more detailed explanation of our review of Inland Valley Cablevision's Form 393 is set forth below. II. Review of Inland Vallev Cablevision's Form 393 The Diehl, Evans review of Inland Valley Cablevision's Form 393 disclosed several material errors in setting the maximum basic tier and equipment and installation rates. In summary, Diehl, Evans found as follows: 1. Basic Tier Rates. On September 30, 1992, Inland offered two service tiers subject to regulation: the basic tier comprising 14 channels, and the CPS tier comprising 23 channels. At that time, Inland charged $12.31 for 14 channels of basic tier service and $18.74 for 37 channels of Basic/CPS service. (These rates include a $0.46 pass-through charge for the possessory interest tax.) on September 1, 1993, Inland retiered in response to rate regulation, offering 23 basic tier channels and 20 CPS tier channels. Concurrently, Inland modified its rates to charge $11.82 for basic tier service and $22.19 for basic/CPS service. Subsequently, Inland filed its Form 393, claiming a maximum permitted rate for basic tier service of $11.87. (All of these rates include the $0.46 pass through.) Diehl, Evans' analysis concludes that Inland's Form 393 contains a number of material errors. Consequently, it is recommended that the maximum basdic service tier rate should be reduced to $11.66 for 23 channels or $0.507. This amounts to a refund to basic service tier subscribers of $0.16 per month. September 29, 1994 Page 5 2. Equipment and Installation Rates. FCC Regulations set the maximum equipment and installation rates at the lesser of the maximum permitted rate according to the Form 393 or the actual rate. In this case, Inland's equipment rental rates exceed its permitted rates. Specifically, Inland's equipment and installation rate schedule will be adjusted as follows: Permitted A c t u a i Lower of Rate Rate Actual or Permitted Rate Hourly Rate $44.52 $44,50 $44.50 Installation of unwired 44.52 44.50 44.50 homes Installation of prewired 29.83 29.82 29.82 homes Installation of additional connection at time of initial 11.13 11.13 11.13 Installation of 22.26 additional connections as separate installation New install underground 0.00 Trip cha~ge 0.00 Charge for changing tiers 0.00 Monthly charge for lease 0.32 of remote control 22.25 22.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.32 Monthly charge converter box of 2.34 2.55 2.34 ORANGE: 1535.1 September 29, 1994 Page 6 III. Recommendation Our recommendation on implementing our review of the Form 393 have two components: Establishing Maximum Rates and Refunds. 1. Establishing Maximum Rates. The basic service tier rate for the period from September l, 1993 through July 14, 1994 should be reduced from the then current rate of $11.82 per month to $11.66 per month, and a refund should be ordered. This should be implemented thirty (30) days after the City Council establishes the maximum rate. The maximum equipment and service charges should be set at the lower of the permitted and actual rates. 2. Refunds. FCC Regulations provide that the City may not order refunds for more than one year retroactively. Consequently, if a city is to order any refunds for the full period between September l, 1993 through July 14, 1994, it is required to act by September 1, 1994. Unfortunately, in order to complete our review of Inland's rates, several document requests were necessary, delaying completion of the review. Consequently, refund liability is from October 11, 1993 through July 14, 1994. In this case, Inland was overcharging on its basic rates by $0.16 per month. Consequently, for the period from October 11, 1993, through July 15, 1994, each basic tier subscriber will be refunded or credited approximately $1.44, which will be approximately $13,131.36 for 9,119 subscribers for 9 months. In addition, Inland was overcharging on remote controls and converter~ boxes by $0.21 and $0.18 per month, respectively. Consequently, basic subscribers who also leased a remote control and converter will receive an additional refund or credit of $3.51. Further, the FCC regulates rates for the CPS tier. This same analysi~ indicates a $0.23 per month overcharge for CPS service. The Resolution directs the City Manager to bring this discrepancy to the attention of the FCC. Finally, FCC Regulations also specify certain procedures for ordering rate refunds. Accordingly, the recommended refund order directs Inland to take the following steps within thirty days after Council action: September 29, Page 7 1994 Inland may make refunds: (i) By refunding overcharges to those subscribers who actually paid the overcharges; or (ii) By means of a specifically identified, one- time credit on prospective bills. Refunds shall include interest computed at applicable rates published by the Internal. Revenue Service for tax refunds and additional tax payments. When the City orders a cable operator to pay refunds to subscribers, it also must return to the operator that portion of the franchise fee that was paid on the total amount of the refund to subscribers. The City must promptly return the franchise fee overcharge either in an immediate lump sum payment, or Inland may deduct it from future franchise fee pa!nnents. In conclusion, the FCC Regulations require that the City Council conduct a public hearing at which Inland may testify before any of the above actions are taken. I will be available at that public hearing to answer any questions the City Council may have. Very truly yours, CC: Peter Thorson, City Attorney William Morgan, CPA SCOTT F. of BURKE, FIELD WILLIAMS & SORENSEN ORANCE: 1535.1 ITEM 3 1 APPROV CITY ATTORNEY~/~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~8hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DATE: November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Nondisposal Facility Element PREPARED BY: ,~J~/Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst DISCUSSION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 DISCUSSION: On December 14, 1993, the City Council adopted the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) as required by the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Since that date, the California Legislature has passed additional legislation regarding the handling of municipal solid waste and requiring that local jurisdictions complete and file various documents and reports with the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). One such piece of legislation is AB 3001 (1992) which requires that each jurisdictions submit a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE). The purpose of the NDFE is to identify those nondisposal facilities which are necessary for implementation of the City's SRRE. Such facilities are material recovery facilities, transfer stations, large-scale cornposting facilities and other waste processing or recycling facilities which require a solid waste facility permit. The NDFE is to identify existing facilities and planned or anticipated facilities that the City may use in order to meet the waste reduction mandates of 25% in 1995 and 50% in 2000, The City's NDFE has been prepared by staff from Western Riverside Council of Governments in cooperation with City staff and the City's franchised hauler, CR&R, Incorporated. It identifies no nondisposal facilities within the City of Temecula and five existing or proposed nondisposal facilities located outside the jurisdication that will or may be used to meet the Cit¥'s diversion requirements. The specified facilities are Recyc, Inc., O.M. Scott and Sons Company, the Perris Transfer Station/Material Recovery Facility, the Mid-County Transfer Station/Material Recovery Facility, and the Murrieta Transfer Stati on/Material Recovery Facility. Recyc and O.M. Scott and Sons are currently existing green waste composting facilities. The Perris facility is permitted, but not yet under construction. The Mid-County and Murrieta facilities are contingent facilities which may or may not be constructed if the Perris facility moves forward. The California Integrated Waste Management Board will use the NDFEs as a planning tool. It is envisioned that they may be used in making siting and permitting decisions. The CIWMB may also be usa them to help jurisdictions identify deficiencies and remedies in reaching their diversion goals. In no case is the NDFE to be used by the CIWMB to determine a City's compliance with AB 939. The adopted NDFE will be submitted to the CIWMB with and become a part of the City's SRRE and HHWE by December 31, 1994, as required. The NDFE is not subject to the environmental review re~luirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (PRC Section 41735 [a}). The City's NDFE has been submitted to the Riverside County Solid Waste Local Task Force for review and comment, as re~luired by statue. This public hearing has been noticed in accordance with law and the document has been on file with the City Clerk for public review. FISCAL IMPACT: None RFSOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THT~ NONDISPOSAL FACTLITY FJ ,~IENT AS PPl~-qCRIBED BY T!tF, CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 WWF~REAS, Public Resources Code Scction 41730 et. scq. requires each city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new and existing nondisposal facilities which will bc n__,3~_ed to implement local Source Reduction and Rccycling Elements; and WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 41730 (a) and Co) requires cach city and county to submit their NDFE to the Local Integrated Waste Management Task Force for review and comment prior to adoption by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Sections 41730, 41731, and 41791.5 state that the NDFE is to be submitted to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for review and approval following Local Task Force and City Council adoption. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Temecula has developed an NDFE which includes all permitted nondisposal facilities curren~y utilized or anticipated for use in the future by the City. Section 2. That the City of Temecula's NDFE has been reviewed by the Riverside County Solid Waste Local Task Force. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula approves the NDFE and agrees to submit it to the State of California Integrated Waste Management Board for review and approval. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. DRAFT CITY OF TEMECULA NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMi~NT OCTOBER, 1~)4 Prepar~l by: Western Riverside Council of Governments 3737 Main St. Ste 420 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone (909) 787-7985 CITY OF TEMECULA NONDISPOSAL FACILITY FJ~EIV[ENT TABL~ OF CONTENTS Introduction Def'mition Background Description of Nondisposal Facilities Attachment A - Table A - 1 Attachment B - Table B - 1 Table B - 2 Table B - 3 Table B - 4 Table B - 5 Attachment C - Table C - 1 Attachment D Table D - 1 DRAFT Page 1 1 1 2 Nondisposal Facilities Located Wi{hln the Jurisdiction With At Least Five Percent Diversion Rate This table is blank at this time because none could be identified. Nondisposal Facilities Located Outside the Jurisdiction With At Least Five Percent Diversion Rate Mid-County Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (Contingent) O~M. Scott and Sons Company, Riverside County Regional Composting Facility (Existing) Recyc, Inc. (Existing) Murrieta Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (Contingent) Pen'is Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (Permitted but Not Constructed) Nondisposal Facilities Located Inside the Jurisdiction With Less Than a Five Percent Diversion Rate This table is blank at this time because none could be identified. Nondlsposal Facilities Located Outside the Jurisdiction With Less Than a Five Percent Diversion Rate This table is blank at this time because none could be identified. APPENDICES: Appendix 1: Appendix 2: Riverside County Local Task Force NDFE Comments City Council NDFE Approval and Resolution I)RAFr DRAFT DRAFT CITY OF TEMECULA NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT Introduction California Public Resources Code (PRC), Sections 41730 eX seq, requires every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) identifying all existing, expansion of existing, and proposed nondisposal facilities which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRREs). The NDFE for the City of Temecula has been prepared and adopted in compliance with the State law and in accordance with the guidelines and format promulgated by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). Pursuant to PRC, Section 40151, a nondisposal facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a State Solid Waste Facility Permit, except a disposal facility (i.e., landfill) or a transformation facility (i.e., waste burned for energy). Background Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) has prepared the NDFE for the City of Temecula as required by PRC Section 41730. Prior to its adoption, the Draft City NDFE was submitted to the Local Task Force (LTF) for review and comment. Their review focused on the regional impacts of the nondisposal facilities identified in this Element, in accordance with the requirements of PRC Sections 41734(a) and 41734(b). After holding a noticed public hearing, the City Council approved and adopted by resolution the NDFE, in compliance with PRC Sections 41730 and 41731. Foilowing the adoption of the City NDFE, the City of Temecula sent a copy of the Temecula NDFE to each corresponding city. The Temecula NDFE will be appended to the City of Temecula's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) at the time of the SRRE's five year revision. As indicated in PRC Section 41735(a), the adoption or amendment of this element is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). DRAFT Description of Nondisposal Facilities The City of Temecula's NDFE identifies nondisposal facilities as deemed by PRC Section 40151, including: materials recovery facilities, transfer stations, and large-scale cornposting facilities that the City intends to utiliTe to implement its SRRE and meet the solid waste diversion requirements of PRC Section 41780. Descriptions of all the identified nondisposal facilities are organized in tabular format and presented in Attachments A, B, C and D. Attachment A describes all existing, expansion of existing, or proposed nondisposal facilities which the City plans to ufiliTe that are located within the jurisdiction which recover for reuse or recycling at least five percent of the total volume of material received by the facility. None of these facilities could be identified at this time. Attachment B identifies all existing, expansion of existing, or proposed nondisposal facilities which the City plans to utiHTe that are located outside the jurisdiction which recover for reuse or recycling at least five percent of the total volume of material received by the facility. Attachment C identifies all existing, expansion of existing, or proposed nondisposal facilities which the City plans to utili:,e that are located within the jurisdiction which recover for reuse or recycling less than five percent of the volume of materials received by the facility. None of these facilities could be identified at this time. Attachment D identifies all existing, expansion of existing, or proposed nondisposal facilities which the City plans to utiliTe, that are located outside the jurisdiction which recover for reuse or recycling less than five percent of the total volume of material received by the facility. None of these facilities could be identified at this time. To clarify the current status of each of the facilities, four categories have been identified: Existing applies to facilities which are currently in operation or will be in operation in 1994; Permitted but Not Constructed applies to facilities which have approved permits from the CIWMB but have not yet begun construction; Proposed applies to facilities that have plans which have been initiated, but the facilities have not yet been permitted; and, Contingent applies to facilities which may not be developed because their development is contingent on other "proposed" facilities which may adequately cover the area's waste stream. Other facilities, are listed as contingent, because the planning for the facility is preliminary due to the limited volume of waste material in the area. 2 DRAFT The discussion of the participating jurisdictions for each facility is based on preliminary information and should not be considered absolute, particularly for the Proposed and Contingent facilities. Several appendices are included in the NDFE. Appendix 1 includes the comments from the Local Task Force on the N'DE. Appendix 2 includes a copy of the NDFE approval and resolution by the City of Temecula and the City Council. 3 DRAFF Type of Facility Table A - 1 City of Temecula NDFE None Identified At This Time Facility Capacity Expected Diversion Rate Paxticipating Jurisdictions Location ATTACHMENT B DRAFT NONDISPOSAL FACH~ITIP-~ LOCATED OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION WITH AT LEAST A FIVE PERCENT DIVERSION DRAFT Table B - 1 City of Temecula NDFE Mid-County Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (Contingent) Type of Facility The development of the Mid-County Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) is contingent on the waste stream and pOteDfial development of other MRFs in the area. If developed, the IVIRF could receive and process loads of mixed municipal, commercial, and industrial solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials. The facility could include a Household Hazardous Waste (HI-IW) Fac'dity to accept and temporarily store the HHW that is either brought in by private citizens or present in the municipal solid waste processed at the MRF, and a composting/co-composting facility. Facility Capacity Expected Diversion Rate Participating Jurisdictions There are three options for the placement of a facility in the Mid-County area: a MRF at the Double Butte Landfill, a MRF at the Lamb Canyon Landfall or a MRF in Pen'is (discussed on Table B-5). Assuming development of the Pen-is MRF, the other two options may not be needed for many years. The Mid-County MRF is proposed to process between 750 - 1,500 tons per day (tpd). The projected diversion ram is approximately 25 to 30 percent. An estimate mount of waste to be sent to this facility is not available at this time. The Mid-County MRF may serve portions of the unincorpomted area, Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Hemet, San hcinto, Penis, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Munieta and Temecula. Location The Mid-County MRF may be located at the Double Butte Landfall, 31710 Grand Avenue, Winchester; or the I.amb Canyon Land fill, 16411 Lamb Canyon Road, Beaumont; or in Penis at the southwest comer of Ellis Avenue and Goetz Road, in the City of Penis. Source: Mid-County Transfer Station & Materials Recovery Facilities, Draft Environmental Impact Report, October, 1993; Prepared by Brown, Vence & Associates in consultation with EIP Associates. DRAFT Table B- 2 City of Temecula NDFE O.M. Scott and Sons Company Riverside County Regional Composting Facility CExisting) Type of Facility The O.M. Scott & Sons Company, Riverside County Regional Cornpasting Facility, accepts and processes residential and commercial yard trimmings to produce compost and mulch for use in the manufacturing of the company's lawn care products. The facility only accepts material delivered by municipal or commercial haulers and is not open to the general public. A portion of the yard trimmings which arrive at the facility is processed at the fac'fiity's grinding system and transferred direc~y to a Scotts blending and bagging plant in Chino, CA or to bulk customers. The remainder of the incoming material is cornposted on-site prior to shipment, The facility is currently under constxuction; full operations are scheduled to begin in 1994. Facility Capacity The O.M. Scott & Sons Cornposting Facility accepts up to 1,320 tons per day (tpd). The maximum annual receiving capacity of the facility is approximately 250,000 tons. Based on the number of days of operation, Scotts expects a maximum average capacity of 874 tons per day. The diversion rate is approximately 95 to 99 percent of the incoming materials. An estimate amount of waste to be sent to this facility is not available at this time. The facility serves unincorporated and incorporated areas within Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Expected Diversion Rate Participating Jurisdictions Location The southwest comer of Riverside Avenue and Wineville Road in the Jurupa area of Riverside County. Source: Draft Report of Cornposting Site Information - The Riverside County Regional Composting Facility, March, 1993; Prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., Woodland Hills, CA, for O.M. Scott & Sons Company, Marysville, OH. DRAFT Type of Facility Facility Capacity Expected Diversion Rate Table B - 3 City of Temecula NDFE Recyc. Inc. (F2tisting) RECYC, Inc. is a large-scale cornposting facility that composts municipal sewage sludge and greenwaste from throughout Southern California. The RECYC cornposting facility is permitted to accept 500 wet tons per day of municipal sewage sludge and an additional 800 cubic yards per day of dry organic feed (typically greenwaste). The diversion rate is 95 to 99 percent. An estimate mount of waste to be sent to this facility is not available at this time. Participating Jurisdictions The facility accepts municipal sewage sludge from the Counties of Riverside, San Bemardino, San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles. It is permitted to accept greenwaste from both Riverside and San Bemardino Counties. Location 22500 Temescal Canyon Road, Corona, in the Temeseal Canyon area of Riverside County. Source: Solid Waste Facilities Permit No. 33-AA-0225 DRAFt Table B - 4 City of Temecula NDFE Murrieta Transfer Stafion/Materink Recovery Facility (Contingent) Type of Facility The Murrieta Valley Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (MP--D would be a solid waste materials recovery and transfer facility which could receive and process loads of mixed waste and source-separated recyclable materials. The Murrieta IVlRF could also include a Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility to accept and temporarily store HHW that is brought in by citizens or is present in mixed municipal solid waste. The development of this facility is contingent upon waste stream tonnages in this area of Riverside County. An application for the MRF was considered by the City of Murrieta but no action has been taken. Facility Capacity Expected Diversion Rate Participating Jurisdictions Location The Murrieta lVlRF which was considered by the City of Murrieta could process a maximum of 2000 Wns per day (tpd) of waste material. The projected diversion rate could be 25 to 35 percent. Another option may be to use the facility as a transfer station, in which case the projected diversion rate is 5 to 10 percent. An estimate amount of waste to be sent to this facility is not available at this time. If developed, the facility could serve the cities of Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Temecula, Temecula, as well as unincorporated areas in southwest Riverside County. A site which was considered for the facility is located in the City of Murrieta, at the southeast comer of Elm Street and Adams Avenue. DRAFT Table B - S City of Temecula NDFE Pen-is Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (Permitted but Not Constructed) Type of Facility The City of Penis Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (IVlRF) is a proposed facility which has acquired local and state permits W receive and process loads of mixed residential and commercial refuse, as well as source-separated recyclables. The MRF would also include a Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility to accept and temporarily store the HHW that is either brought in by private citizens or present in the municipal solid waste processed at the MRF. Facility Capacity The Per~s MRF is permitted to process a maximum of 1,800 tons of waste material per day. It is unknown at this time how much unincorporated area waste may he sent to this facility. Expected Diversion Rate The expected diversion rate is approximately 25 percent. An estimate mount of waste to be sent to this facility is not available at this time. Participating Jurisdictions Location The Perils MRF may potentially serve portions of the unincorporated area and the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Hemet, San Jacinto, Perils, l~ke Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Murrieta, Moreno Valley and Temecula. Southwest comer of Ellis Avenue and Goetz Road, in the City of Pen'is. Source: Solid Waste Facility Perink No. 33-AA-0239 DRAFt ATTACHMENT C NONDISPOSAL FACILITIES LOCATED INSIDE TIlE JURISDICTION WITH LESS THAN A FIVE PERCENT DIVERSION Type of Facility Table C - 1 City of Temecula NDFE None Identified At This Time DRAFT Facility Capacity Expected Diversion Rate Participating Jurisdictions Location ATTACHIV~NT D DRAF'F NONDISPOSAL FACH,,IT~-~ LOCATED OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION WITH LESS THAN A FIVE PERCENT DIVERSION DRAVF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOCAL TASK FORCE COMMENTS ON THE CITY OF TEMECLqA NDFE DRAFT APPENDIX 2 CITY OF TE.MECULA NDFE APPROVAL AND RESOLUTION / ~--~ Riverside County Waste Resources fl~anagement District Robert A. Netton, Chief Eututiee O~ttr SUBIV!I'ITAL TO ~ SOt,m WASTE ADVISORY COUNCIL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAt,mORNIA FROM: Waste Resources Management District SUBNu'rlAL DATE: October 20, 1994 SUBJECT: Consideration of Nondisposal Facilities Elements (NDFE) for Cities Within the County of Riverside RECOMlVlENDED MOTION: The Solid Waste Management Advisory Council (Countywide Local TagIt Force) finds that the NDFEs for the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Callmesa, Canyon I site, Corona, r ~te. Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murri~.a, Norco, Pems, Riverside, San Jaeinto, Temecula, Cathedral City, Coachella, De~rt Hot Springs, Ir~dian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, palm Desert, palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Blythe axe adequate in addressing regional concerns. JIJSTIFICATION: The Local Ta~l~ Force (L/F) is required per California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 9, Article 7, Section 18765 Co) to consider the issues of regional impacts of potential diversion facilities. S~fff has roviowod tho cities' NDFKs and has prepared tho wrimm commonts in Attaduncnt A. The attached Table summarizes the facilities identified in the cities and County NDFEs. With thc inclusion of the commc~u from Attachment A, tThe Elements meet the requirements of the regulations and adequately portray regional concerns. Chief Executive Officer KG:NIIS MII~rL~I~_S OF ~ SOLIT~ WAST~ 1VIA_NAO~,~ ADVISORY COUNCIL On the motion of John Pietlg, seconded by Dick Kelly and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDEl~h'tD that the above manor is approved as recommended. Ayes: Nees: · Absent: Dam: Johnson, Magee, Koontz, D. Beck, Kelly, WOhlmuth, Ryan, Anderson, Boyd, Sebba and Piefig None Reed, Marshall, Axmguin, Slevera, Holt, Robens, McCle!I~-, Bean, Baitenger, Beck October 20, 1994 Frnnees TrevinO S~,uiary 199S Market Street · Rinnidt. CA ~2501.1719 · (9091275.1S70 · Fax (909t 275.1574 ITEM 32 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Robarts, Interim Finance Officer November 15, 1994 Property Insurance Coverage PREPARED BY: '~.r~Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff in accordance with one of the following options: Submit notice to Strachota/Aetna that the City is cancelling the policy, effective November 30, 1994 and direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through Driver/PEPIP, effective December 1, 1994. Terminate the Aetna policy in conjunction with its expiration on February 26, 1995. In the interim, revise the policy provisions in accordance with the proposal submitted by Strachota. Direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through Driver/PEPIP, after expiration of the current Aetna policy. DISCUSSION: The City's current property insurance policy expires on February 26, 1995, and is provided by Aetna Insurance Company, through Strachota Insurance, the City's insurance broker. The policy coverage includes all-risk and earthquake at various City locations. On February 22, 1994, in conjunction with the authorization to renew the property insurance policy, City Council directed staff to obtain new insurance proposals at mid-policy year. Thereafter, on September 13, 1994, two proposals for property insurance were presented to City Council. The Council's direction at that time was to allow the current broker to resubmit a proposal and return the item for consideration. As a result, two proposals are submitted for consideration: 1 ) Strachota Insurance Company (Strachota Proposal); and 2) Robert F. Driver Company (Driver Proposal). The Strachota proposal consists of a combination of blanket and scheduled coverage. For the most part, the blanket coverage amounts correspond to the declared property values, for example the limit on the building coverage ($6,070,000) is the total value of all insured buildings. The non-blanket coverage specify the limits of insurance recommended by the Strachota, for each location, The Driver proposal consists of participation in the Public Entity Property Insurance Program (PEPIP), a joint insurance purchasing program. PEPIP is a combined group purchase concept with the advantage of group purchase pricing and no risk sharing. The proposal provides broad coverage along with the flexibility to ensure that the City is adequately covered. Attachment A illustrates comparison of the two proposals. The primary difference in the two proposals is that the Driver proposal provides greater protection from being under insured through policy provisions such as agreed amounts, coverage not confined to schedule, and ninety (90) day newly acquired locations coverage. Correspondingly, under the Strachota proposal, the maximum to be paid for any one occurrence is the assigned limit of coverage contained in the policy. Attachment B addresses issues which are relevant to consideration of the two proposals. These issues include: I) Policy Forms; II) Comparison of Proposals; Ill) Admitted/Non-Admitted Carrier; IV) Co-insurance Requirement; V) Customer Service; VI) Consolidation of Existing Policies; VII) Deductible; and VIII) Premiums. in reviewing the proposals, the options which the City Council may wish to consider are as follows: Submit notice to Strachota and Aetna that the City is terminating the policy, effective November 30, 1994 and direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through PEPIP, effective December 1, 1994. An early cancellation penalty of approximately $500 will be assessed if this option is selected. Based upon the current declared values, the PEPIP annual premium amount is $32,290. Terminate the Aetna policy in conjunction with its expiration on February 26, 1995. In the interim, revise the policy provisions in accordance with the proposal submitted by Strachota. Direct staff to obtain property insurance coverage through PEPIP, after expiration of the current Aetna policy. Based upon the current declared values, the PEPIP annual premium amount is $32,290. in both instances above, Driver has committed to honoring the premium quote submitted on October 7, 1994. However, should there be an occurrence which changes the earthquake coverage market, Driver will have to revise the earthquake portion of the premium. FISCAL IMPACT: Due to the increase in the City's declared values, the proposed premium exceeds the budget appropriation. Additionally, should the Council elect to cancel the policy prior to its expiration (Option 1 ), there will be a penalty of approximately $500. Thus, in the absence of savings in other Insurance Internal Service Fund accounts, a mid-year increase will be required. AT'rA~ A COMPARISON OF PROPOSArs Buildings Valuable Papers EDP STRACHOTA (AETNA) $6,070,000 $1,000,000 $300,000 $6,070,000 $1,000,000 $300,000 DRIVER (PEPIP) Media Office Contents Property Off Premises Outdoor Property Rental Income $150,000 $1,380,000 $10,000 $5,000 $1,000 Business Interruption $1,000 Demolition & increased Cost of Construction Debris Removal Contingent Liability due to building codes Extra Expense $6,070,000 $1,517,500(25% of Building values) $1,000 $200,000 Transit $1 ,O00 Accounts Receivable $5,000 Architects' Engineers $6,070,000 Fees Course of $1,000 Construction on Premises Mobile Equipment $51,000- Higher coverage with additional premium $150,000 $1,380,000 Full Replacement Value Full Replacement Value Actual Loss Sustained resulting from untenantability Per Declared Values - additional premium required Full Replacement Value Full Replacement Value Full Replacement Value Necessary extra expense incurred in order to continue normal operations - Not to exceed two consecutive weeks. Full Replacement Value Per Declared Values Full Replacement Value Full Replacement Value Actual Cash Value - Per Scheduled Property ATTACHMENT A 2 COMPARISON OF PROPOSALS Service InterruDtion- Utilities Tax Interruption Fine Arts Exterior Signs Arson Reward Fire Dept Service Charge Fire Extinguisher Recharge Lost Key Consequential Loss Cost of Research Expediting Expense Newly Acquired Locations Earthquake Flood STRACHOTA (AETNA) $1,000 NotIncluded $5,000 $2,500 $2,500 $5,000 $1,000 $250 $5,000 NotIncluded NotIncluded $8,550,000 NotIncluded DRIVER (PEPIP) $5,000,000 Policy limit Per Declared Values - additional premium required City Property - Current fair market Other's Property - Agreed amount Full Replacement Value Not Included Full Replacement Value Not Included Not Included NotIncluded $500,000 Policy Limit $5,000,000 Policy Limit $5,000,000 $200,000 ATTACHMENT B PROPERTY INSURANCE PROPOSAL ISSUES II. III. IV. COMPARISON OF POLICY FORMS The Aetna policy proposed by Strachota provides a basic policy form to which endorsements have been added to establish or augment various coverages. Additionally, there are coverage limits in the basic policy form which are insufficient. An example is glass breakage, which provides $100 per plate or pane, and no more than $500 for all loss of or damage to building glass, per occurrence. Another example is Valuable Papers, which does not provide full replacement of the data on the valuable papers. An endorsement (at a premium of $1,000 per year) has been added to the policy to cover full replacement. The PEPIP policy form proposed by Driver provides a broad level of coverage. In contrast, the PEPIP policy covers most items, except where specifically excluded. For example, glass breakage is covered, not by direct reference, but by lack of exclusion. COMPARISON OF PROPOSALS The primary difference in the proposals are the limits and types of coverages. The Strachota proposal contains specific limits of coverage. These limits correspond to the declared values for real and personal property. The Driver proposal contains limits of coverage which are higher than the declared values. This provision is significant in cases where City property values may change. ADMI'R'ED/NON-ADMI I I ED CARRIER This issue pertains to cases where admitted and non-admitted insurers are being considered. The Insurance regulations specify that when proposals have been received from both types of insurers, the proposal from the admitted carrier must be selected. However, two exclusions from this requirement apply in this case: 1 ) The non-admitted carrier may be selected if their proposal contains provisions which are not addressed in the admitted carriers proposal; or 2) If a minimum of three admitted carriers have declined to write the coverage, then the coverage may be submitted to a non-admitted carrier. The two exclusions apply to the Driver proposal. The proposal offers a group purchase option which is not available under the Strachota proposal. Further, the broker has obtained three declines from admitted carriers. CO-INSURANCE REQUIREMENT The co-insurance provision is a means by which a penalty is assessed to the insured for being underinsured. For example: 2 When: The value of the property is The Co-insurance percentage for it is The Existing Limit of Insurance for it is The Deductible is The amount of the loss is $3,500,000 90% $3,000,000 $250 $1,000,000 Using the above information, the formulafor determining the amount to be covered from the above loss is: Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Step 4: $3,500,000 (Value of Property) X 90% (co-insurance percentage) = $3,150,000 (the minimum amount of insurance to meet City's requirements) $3,000,000 (current insurance limit)IS3,150,000 (limit required) = .95 (indicates that only 95% of the co-insurance requirement is being met) $1,000,000 (loss amount) X .95 = $950,000 (maximum amount to be paid by insurance company, minus deductible) $950,000 - $250 (deductible) = $949,750 (maximum amount to be paid by insurance company) Given the above example, the most which the insurance company would pay on this loss would be 6949,750. The remaining $50,250 would not be covered. Although the co-insurance provision reduces premium dollars for the insured because the values are rated at 90%, it also places the burden of maintaining up-to-date values on real and personal property at all times. As illustrated above, the cost incurred for losses substantially increases due to the co-insurance requirement, if values are incorrect. The Aetna policy contains the co-insurance requirement, the PEPIP policy does not contain this provision. CUSTOMER SERVICE The City has limited customer service experience with Driver, all of which is associated with the PEPIP proposal. Although there has been limited interaction, Driver has been responsive in addressing questions, providing information and follow-through. Additionally, Driver has extensive experience in the municipal insurance arena. PEPIP is specifically written for public agencies. Participants in the PEPIP program include the cities of Burbank, Costa Mesa, FreSno, Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena, Santa Monica, and Santa Barbara, Joint powers insurance authority participants in the program include, Bay Cities Joint Powers Authority, Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (CSJVRMA), Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California (PARSAC), San Diego Pooled Insurance Program Authority (SANDPIPA), and San Diego County Cities Risk Management Authority (SDCCRMA). Additional participants include water, sanitation, air pollution control, and transportation agencies. The City has extensive customer service experience with Strachota. Strachota was the first company to provide both general liability and property insurance for the City. Approximately one year after incorporation, a new broker was obtained for the general liability insurance; the property insurance has remained with Strachota. The City's property needs have grown considerably, particularly with the acquisition of new facilities (Senior Center, CRC). Thus, the City now requires a broker with expensive experience and expertise in the area of public agencies. VI. CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING POLICIES The City currently maintains a separate policy for Contractor's Equipment (tractors, trailers) at a premium of $588 per year. The Aetna policy form allows Contractor's Equipment to be added for an additional premium of approximately $250. The PEPIP policy extends coverage to include Contractor's Equipment, with no additional premium. VII. DEDUCTIBLE Strachota - Aetna: $5,000 - Special Form including theft 10% - Earthquake Driver - PEPIP: $5,000 - All-Risk 10% ~ Earthquake VIII. PREMIUMS Strachota - Aetna: $28,780 - 90% Co-insurance, (includes Earthquake) Driver - PEPIP: $32,290 ($3,180 All Risk/S29,110 Earthquake) ITEM 33 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager November 15, 1994 Consideration of Sponsorship Requests Prepared by: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager )~/ ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the sponsorship requests for the Temecula Rod Run, Balloon and Wine Association, and the Tractor Race Committee of the Temecula Town Association (TTA). BACKGROUND: During the past four years, the sponsors of the Rod Run, Balloon & Wine Festival and Tractor Race have requested varying levels of support in the form of loans and sponsorships. The funding has been made apart from the annual Community Services Funding Program. At the direction of the City Council, staff has combined the FY 1994-95 sponsorship requests into one item for consideration. Due to the fact that these activities 13tomore tourism in Temecula, funding would come from the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. Attached for your review and consideration are the following sponsorship requests: Rod Run $10,000 Balloon and Wine 7,500 Tractor Race 10.000 $27.500 Currently, the Balloon and Wine Festival has an outstanding balance on their loan in the amount of $20,000. The balance is to be repaid in annual installments with the term ending in 1998. The Temecula Town Association loan of $68,000 is not due until July 1996. Council may want to consider forgiving the amount of the request against these loans rather than making a cash contribution. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding would come from the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. ATTACHMENTS: Sponsorship Materials INTRODUCTION :~neoula Rod Run has been a traditional event featuring hundreds of pre- ~' -..4d0t rods, street rods, muscle and per/ormance cars since 1967. ~~l~t~r 1000 cars from throughout Southern California participate, with 30,000 to ..~?'~:40,000 spectators converginq on the wonderful circa late 1600s facade of Old ' -.'~ Town Temecula to view these cars from a bygone era. While in Old Town, people I-: love to browse the hundreds of unique craff and antique stores while viewing .;, ~, these hot, souped-up cars. And because the event is free, it is a fun, affordable event for the entire family. Saturday the participants go on a Poker Run Cruise through Temecula's wine country then return to Old Town Temecula for cruising. Everyone's favorite part is when the mufflers are discarded and they try to blow each other away as they rumble, rock and roll down Front Street in the Open Header Cruise. Sunday features a Show & Shine Competition with an award presentation in the afternoon. The purpose of holding the event each year is: · To provide a fun, affordable event for area residents while generating sales for downtown merchants · To support miscellaneous promotional campaigns for Old Town Temecula (freeway billboard signage, advertising, etc.) · To promote the Temecula Valley as a tourist destination · To promote the Temecula Valley as a desirable area for purchasing homes and/or relocating businesses. To support this event, which is organized by the non-profit Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association, sponsorships are offered to businesses, allowing them an event marketing tie-in opportunity. The enclosed sponsorship levels list the benefits to be received as a sponsor. Plus, sponsors will benefit from the vast publicity generated by the event, including a program distributed to over 36,000 homes in the Temecula Valley. Also, advertising of the event reaches over a million impressions throughout the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange County, not to mention the visibility they will have at the event (depending on level of sponsorship). TEMECULA - 95 ROD RUN TENTATIVE BUSINESS PLAN PURPOSE: The purpose of the TEMECULA - 95 ROD RUN is to promote and enhance public awareness of "OLD TOWN TEMECULA", the sponsoring organization Old Town Temecula Merchants Association, and to assist local charitable organizations through cash donations. SITE: The Temecula - 95 Rod Run Committee intends to utilize Old Town Temecula as the site of the 1995 event, subject to approval of the City. It is requested that Front Street be closed during the Open Header Cruise on Saturday, February 18, 1995 from 2 pm to 4 pm and all day on Sunday, February 19, 1995 from 5 am to 3 pm. It is also requested that Sixth Street be closed from Mercedes to Front on Saturday and Sunday, starting at 5 am on Saturday and continuing to 3 pm on Sunday. In addition Third Street be closed from Mercedes to Front on Sunday from 5 am to 3 pm. The committee plans to use the City owned property at sixth & Main. All other activities will take place throughout the community. EVENT DATES: Saturday, February 18 and Sunday, February 19, 1995 ACTIVITIES: The tentative scheduled activities of the Temecula- 95 Rod Run are a follows: SATURDAY - FEBRUARY 18, 1995 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM 4:00 PM - 8:00 PM Registration - Paradise Chevrolet Poker Cruise by King of Clubs Car Club Open Header Cruise in Old Town Cruising Old Town Temecula (No open Headers) SUNDAY - 6:00 7:00 3:00 FEBRUARY 19, 1995 AM - 10:00 AM AM - 3:00 PM PM - 4:00 PM Registration - Paradise Chevrolet Show and Shine & Special Events in Old Town Temecula Awards - Top Class Picks, Celebrity Picks, Poker Run Winners. Beverages - Beer and Bloody Mary's will be sold to those over the age of twenty one. All sales will be mandated by the State of California ABC Code. Soft drinks, coffee, tea, etc. will also be sold. Old Town Temecula Merchants Association will handle all beverage sales. Hours on Saturday, 11 am to 5 pm; Sunday, 6 am to 4 pm Classic Car Exhibits - On Sunday there will be approximately 1000 cars on display. Entertainment - Saturday and Sunday entertainment will be provided featuring D.J. and KRTM will be broadcasting live all day. Open Header Cruise - The "Open Header Cruise" will take place on Saturday, February 18 2 pm and 4 pm on Front Street between Mercedes and 2nd Street. Only those hot rods that are pre-registered will be allowed to participate. Poker Run Cruise - Saturday's Rod Run will provide the street rods an opportunity to cruise the highways and byways of Temecula seeking just the right poker hand to win special prizes. At each Poker Run stop, a representative will have a deck of cards for the participant to draw a card, which will be noted on a playing sheet. The Poker Run will end at a yet undetermined area in Old Town. This event will take place throughout the community and no special event permit will be required. Power Parking - Power parking will be conducted bythe A1 Malaikah Temple, A.A.O.N.M.S. under the direction of william B. Victor, Ambassador-At-Large. Vendors Sales - there will be car related vendors which will display and sell their wares. All will provide to the Temecula - 95 Car Run Committee their California re- sale number according to the California Franchise Tax board rules. ATTENDANCE: The planned attendance for Sunday is no more than 5000 people at one time, which is approximately 2000 cars. PARKING: It is planned that vehicles park on the streets of Pujol, Mercedes, Moreno Rd., Front Street from Santiago south to the freeway. In addition vehicles will be allowed to park at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center, and at the Temecula Community Center. MARKETING & MANAGEMENT: Marketing and management of the event, working under the direction of Chairman John Gervais will be Harker Enterprises, Event Planning & Marketing. SECURITY: Security will be provided by a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff and volunteers. INSURANCE: Sponsoring organization will provide a general liability policy and liquor liability policy naming the City of Temecula as additional insured. PORTABLE TOILETS: The committee will install sufficient (30) portable toilet facilities and (6) handicap portable toilet facilities. They will be responsible for the sanitation and multiple cleaning on a daily basis. They will meet all health requirements as set by County Ordinance. Portable toilets will be install on the City Property at Sixth & Front. TRASH: Local Boy Scout Troop 301 will provide on-site continuous cleaning during and after the event. In addition, there will be sufficient trash receptacles that will be emptied regularly. There will be a competent trash hauler for trash removal with total off-site removal within 24 hours following the event. FIRST AID: First-aid and emergency medical services will be provided by local medical professionals on a full time basis at the run site. SITE PREPARATION, SET UP AIqD DISMANTLING: The City is to post "NO PARKING" signs on Thursday, February 16. The City will set up the barriers to close the streets at appropriate locations on Saturday morning and take them down on Saturday afternoon for the ,'open Header Cruise". Front Street will be closed to thru traffic on Saturday, February 18 from 2 pm to 4 pm. "Front Street will be closed at 5:00 AM on Sunday, February 19 at Moreno Road and Front (by Circle K) and at Front and 2nd Street. All barriers will be removed at 3:00 pm on Sunday and the City will pick them up at their discretion. PERMIT FEE: Non-profit Organization Special Event permit fee's will be paid to the City of Temecula as requested. The fee for the sheriff is to be worked out with the Police Department. The ABC will provide the liquor permit. CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (Please Print or Type) Amount Requested: $ Project Name: Project Starting Date: Project Ending Date: $10,000 Temecula '95 Rod Run - 9th Annual February 21, 1994 February 20, 1995 ORGANIZATION'S BACKGROUND: Name of Organization: Mailing address: P. 0. Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Assocation Box 1981 Temecula, CA 92593 (formerly Old Town Temecula Merchants Association) Telephone: (909) 699-8138 Year Founded 1986 Number of paid staff none Number of volunteers 40+:{more for event) 01d Town Temecula plus promotion benefiting the entire Temecula Valle~ Geographic area(s)served is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization? Yes. If "yes": No x Date of incorporation as a non-profit Federal identification number State identification number (Not incorporated yet, but does have non-profit tax status with IRS and state) If "no": Name of sponsoring organization Its federal identification number Its state identification number Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California (SEE ATTACHED - EXHIBIT A PAGES 1-4) Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association 95-1010030 000 18910 application has been authorized by the organization's: Executive Committee Board of Directors Members-at-large Old To,vn ~canecula Mainstrcet Association · Box 1981 ·Ten, ecula, Calilornia 92590 TO: City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Committee FROM: Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association (OTTMA) DATE: August 26, 1994 It is the understanding of the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association (OTTMA) that the City Council has given direction to the City's staff to develop a mechanism in which the major events (Rod Run, Balloon & Wine Festival and Tractor Race) would each receive sponsorship of $10,000. However we do not want to lose out on our "window of opportunity" for funding and therefor are using this procedure to request funds through this grant application. The Rod Run has brought as many as 30 to 40 thousand people making it by far the largest event inside the City limits Last year every restaurant and hotel was filled to capacity. Not only does this event bring money to the tourist destination industrie. n town, such as the hotels, restaurants, gas stations, etc., but the Old Town shops, wineries, golf resorts, travel industries, stores and other businesses benefit. Indirectly, the domino effect stimulates the local economy with ancillary spending by employees and the miscellaneous businesses supporting the event, such as heavy equipment suppliers~ fencing & signage companies, rental services and more. Additionally, many local non profit organizations profit from these events as a venue to promote themselves and use as a fundraiser by offering their volunteer services for donations. The promotional efforts for these events reach from San Diego to Santa Barbara to Arizona and New Mexico plus nationally in more targeted publications -- car collector, wine and food publications, plus travel, leisure, and senior medias. Even if people don't attend the event, they are reminded of the area's attractions and may come another time to visit the wineries, shop in the antique stores, play golf, go horseback riding, or experience the world famous hot springs. Some may be so impressed with the area, they move here, open a business or get their company to relocate. On ~ehalf of the Temecula '95 Rod Run and the other events that draw from outside the area, we would like to ask the committee to please keep our needs for funding in mind when deciding your economic development budget for the 94- 95 fiscal year because these events: (1) Improve the quality of life of residents (2) Promote the city and its attractions (3) Encourage people and businesses to relocate here and/or return for other visits and (4) Increase the area's economic viability INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DISTRICT ~IRECTOR 2 CUPANIA CIRCLE MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 Date: SEP. 19, i791 OLD TOWN TEMECULA MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION P 0 BOX 1981 TEM~CULAm CA ~ZI~O DEPARIHENT OF THE TREASUR) Employer ;dentificatic. n Number: 33-04~'!480 Case Number: 95124800~ Contact Person: GULAPAN~ C. Contact Telephone Number: <213) 725-787~ Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(~) Accounting Period Ending: December 31 gorn ~0' Required: Yes Addendum Applies~ No Dear Applicant: Based on information supplied~ and assumin9 your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition Of exemption, we have determined you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal ~evenue Code as an organization described in the section indicated above. Unless specifically excepted, you are liable for taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (sOcial security taxes) for each employee to whom you pay $i00 or more during a calendar year, And~ unless excepted, you are also liable for tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act for each employee to whom you pay $50 or more during a calendar quarter if, during the current or preceding calendar ~ear, you had one Or more employees at any time in each of 20 calendar weeks OF yOU paid wages of Sl,500 or More in any calendar quarter. if you have any questions abou~ excise, employment, or other Federal taxes, please address them to this office. If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or method of operation change, please let us know so we can consider the effect of the change on your exempt status. In the case of an amendment to your organiza- tional document or bylaws~ please send us a copy of the amended document or byta.s. Also, you should inform us of all changes in your name or address. in the heading of this letter we have indicated whether you must file Form ~?0, Return ef Organization Exempt From Income Tax. If Yes is indicated, you are required to file Form ?90 only if your gross receipts each year are normally more than $25,000. However, if you receive a Form ?~0 package in the mail, please file the return even if you do not exceed the gross receipts test. If you are not required to file, simply attach the label provided, check the box in the heading to indicate that your annual gross receipts are normally S25,000 or less, and sign the return. If a return is required, it must be filed by the 15th day of the fifth OLD TOWN TEMECULA MERCHAMTS month after the end of your annual accounting period. A penalty of $10 a day is charg~.d when a return is filed late, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. However~ the maximum penaitZ charged cannot exceed $5,000 or 5 per- cent of your gross receipt~ for the year, whichever is less. This penalty also be charged if · return is not complete, so please be Sure your return ie complete before you file it. You are not required to file Federal income tax returns unless you ere subject to the tax on unrelated business income under section 511 of the Code. If you are subject to this tax, you must file an income tax return on Form 9~O-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return. In this letter we are not determining whether any of your present or proposed activities are unre- lated trade or business as defined in section 515 of the Code. You need an employer identification number even if you have no employees, If an embloyer identification number wa~ not entered on your application, a number will be assigned to you and you will be advised of it. Please use that number on all returns you file and in all correspondence with the Internal Revenue Service. If we have indicated in the heading of this letter that an addendum applies, the enclosed addendum is an ~ntegral part of this letter. Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your exempt status, you should keep it in your permanent records. If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter, Sincerely yours, District DireCtor NC:~-:I$E TAX ~ugust 1~, 1992 LXHiBi] A PA6~ b In reply re~er to OLD TOWN TEMECULA MECHANTS ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 1981 TEMECULA CA 92593 Code Section : Form o~ Organization : Accounting PeriOd Ending: OrganizatAon RumbeE : BUSINESS LEASUE 23701e Association December 31 9765792 You are eEempt ~rom state ~ranchise or income tax under the section o~ the Revenue and Taxation Code indiceted above. This decision is based on information you submitted and assumes that your present operations continue unchanged or conform to those proposed t your application. Any change in operation, character, or purpose o~ ne organization must be reported immediately to this o~ice so that we may determine the e~ect on your exempt status. Any change o~ name or address must ~lso be reported. In the even~ o~ a change in relevant statutory, administrative, judicial case i~w, ~ change in ~ederal interpretation o~ ~ederal l~w in cases ~here our opinion is based upon such an interpretation, or a chanSe in the material ~acts or circumstances retatin9 to your application upon ~hich this opinion is based, this opinion may no longer be applicable. It is your responsibility {o be a~are o~ these changes should ~hey occur. This paragraph constitues written advice, o~her than a ohie~ counsel ruling, ~ithin {he meaning o~ Revenue and Taxation Code Section Z1012[a)(2). You may be required to ~ile Form 199 (E~empt Organization Annual Information Re~urn) on or before the 15th day o~ the Sth month [U 1/2 months) ~ter the close o~ your accounting period. Please see ~nnu~l instructions ~i~h ~orms ~or requirements. AugUst 1~, 1992 OLD TONK TEMECULA MECHANTS Corporate Number 976S792 Page 2 ASSOCIATIDK You axe not required to ~ile state ~=anchise or income tax returns unless you have income subject to the unrelated business income tam undex Section 2~731 o~ the Code. In this event, you are ~equized to {ile ~orm 109 (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return) by the 1~%h aay o~ the 5%h month (~ 1/2 months) ~ter the close o~ your annual accounting period. Please note that an exemption ~rom ~ederal income or o~hez ~axes and othez state taxes requizes separate applications. R BRIKE EXEMPT ORGAKIZATIOK UNIT COEPORATIOK AUDIT SECTION Telephone (916) 369-q171 EO co: DOKA PURVIS City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program ~-"-Hcation Page 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Based on your organization's last fiscal year) Balance Sheet as of A~Sqt Cash and Investments $ Receivables (detail) 8-18-94 4,287.49 10,000.00 , Liabilities & Investments Current payables $ 2,379.81 Notes Payable 0 Inventory e Fund Balance (~ Fixed Assets (~ Other Assets 0 Total Liability & Totat Assets $ 14,287.49 Fund Balance $ 2,379.81 income Statement for the Year Ended 1994 F~ scal Income Expenses Fundraising $ 14,000 Salaries $ ~ Foundation grants $ (~ Operating expenses $ 9,000.00 United Way $ e Community services$ (~ Government Funds $ (~ Amount sent to national/parent organization $ ~ Other sources $ 0 Other expenses $ (~ Piease notewith an asterisk any amounts thatrequire additionalexplanation, and comment on these items. * Hembets Dues - $4,700 Rod Run Income $5,300 In addition, please attach the orgenization's most recent treasurer's report, financial statements and footnotes. (It does not require a CPA's audit, but please submit if available.) City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 3 Your Organization's Mission: Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. Include discussion regarding the specific ways your organization meets the City's criteria listed on page 2. The goals and objectives of the Old Town Temecula Nainstreet Association are: 1) To protect, preserve and promote the authentic 5outhem California history, lore and architecture of the area; 2) To create a viable economic environment through increased tourism and community patronage to allow local businesses to prosper; 3) To preserve the Old West theme throughout Old Town by encouraging activities that promote a western activity, such as Western Days, country western dances, etc.; 4) To educate the community and surrounding area as to the importance of Temecula as a ignificant factor in the overall settling of Southern California; These goals and objectives are met in part by staginq many activities throuqhout the Old Town area. Western Days are held twice a year, with emphasis on local western activities. Add- itionally, the merchants support all community activities by announcing and holding compli- mentary activities within the Old Town area, i.e. Tractor Race, Rodeo, Balloon & Wine Festival, etc. Because of the historical nature of the Old Town area, and the large number of antique stores within the district, additional activities have been attempted. The Rod Run, established 8 years ago, began with a western theme. All of the cars are at least thirty years old, which fits into the definition of "antique". Other events the OTTMA participate in is a Fall Harvest Festival over Halloween weekend and the"City's "Holiday Lites and Festive Sites" program. Our activities are primarily staffed by volunteers and any profits made from this event are put into promoting the Old Town Temecula area in way of freeway billboards and advertising. Our board of directoF serves the public through lobbying efforts on behalf of its merchants to preserve the above mission statements regarding the preservation of historical Old Town. PAGE 3a You're invited to become an active voice in Historic Old Town's future, "And Support the Town that SUPPORTS You." - Shop Temecula first-no need to travel elsewhere, your taxes pay for main- taining this great town. A healthy business economy comes with networking with all businesses, (they are your neighbor). Help preserve the Old West theme throughout Old Town which increases tourism and bolsters your' s and Temecula Valley' s economy. Increases awareness with Old Town activities and generates new residents and businesses. Old Town is famous for promoting these events: * Early Times mid-winter Rod Run (40,000 in attendance) * Old Town Western Days. for April and August (5000 each time) * A Haunting in Old Town-OCtober (5000 attend) * An Old Town Christmas with Santa- a yearly tradition * Old Town Farmers Market every Thursday night with over 20 farmers participating THESE EVENTS ARE MADE POSSIBLE BY YOUR TIME AND DUES TO O.T.M.A. Other events in Temecula: * May Balloon & Wine Festival * Fourth of July Parade and Picnic * Arts Festival- July * Great Temecula Tractor Race BECCME A PART OF YOUR TOWN- YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 4 Project(s) needing funding How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the project's objectives, number of persons served, area where services are 13rovided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific, Note any equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Please include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this project. Piease attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space. SEE EXHIBIT B PAGE 4a EXHIBIT B The Temecula Rod Run has been a traditional event featuring street rods and antique cars. Car enthusiasts from throughout Southern California love to participate or just come and browse. Also, local families can enjoy this affordable event featuring fun entertainment, the wonderful circa 1800's facade of Old Town Temecula and their myriad antique and craft stores, and hot, souped-up cars from a bygone era. The Temecula Rod Run has experienced a major growth cycle in recent years, culminating in the need to fence off the streets of Temecula in 1993 and charge admission to finance the event. The Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association, sponsors of the event, are reverting back to the open, welcoming atmosphere of previous year's runs by not charging admission. Without admission fees, sponsorships and grant monies are necessary to support the event. Your grant money will go towards promoting the event and paying for necessary expenses. The non-profit Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association and other area charitable organizations will benefit from the proceeds of the event. For their grant money the City will receive · City logo/or name will appear on press releases, advertisements and flyers relating to the event. · City name on banner promoting the event displayed for several weeks in the community. · City name will appear on all the Press -'e letterhead. · Publication rights allowing use of event logo in City's marketing program. · 20 Event Tee Shirts. · Name on event Tee Shirt signifying event is promoted by the City (If accepted by December 15, 1994). · Name recognition in Official Program Tab. City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 5 We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and belief. (Sign both if same) AND Kari Spencer-Hollis, Harker Enterprises, Marketinq Director NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) (Signature and ' of individ~ng application form) I""'~ ~~ r (S'gnature and title of President~er) Old Temecula Mainstreet Association (Organization Name) P,0. Box 1981, Temecula, CA 92593 (Address of Organization) (909) 699-8138 (Telephone) August 26, (Date) 1994 Return Completed Application to: City of Temecula Finance Department Community Service Funding Program 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-6430 .F~'-F~TIVA L Tradition Since ]983" September 14,, 1994 Ron Bradley City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Ron, On behalf of the entire Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, I would like to thank you for your support and commitment for the past several years as a sponsor. We are very proud to have City of Temecula's name appear in all our marketing and public relations efforts and hope we can continue this tradition in 1995. The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival is one of the most unique cultural event in Southern California. The festival will take place on April 28-30th, 1995. This is the llth year of tradition, with attendance exceeding 35,000 in 1994, and hope to exceed 45,000 in 1995. As in the past the festival will feature over 50 hot air balloons, main stage headline entertainment, western village, kids faire, commercial court, arts and crafts fair and wine tasting from Temecula Valley. Please look over the enclosed sponsorship proposal, we recommend City of Temecula sponsor the Tourism Tent. I attached a preliminary layout of the festival, including the placement of the Tourism Tent. This tent will be stategically placed at the bus loading area, it will be carpeted, with balloon arched entry, decorated with trees and complete with fans in order to create a welcome enviroment. The Tourism Tent will feature over twelve businesses offering reasons to return to Temecula Valley to either live or play. In addition there will be an ongoing slide show of the Temecula Valley, information tables on events of the Valley and it is our hope the City of Temecula employees acting as hosts. The cost of this sponsorship is $7,500.00 27475 Ynez Road. Suite 335 · Temecula. California 92591 · (909) 676-4713 Since you are the expert, all the sponsorships offer tons of marketing publicity and media exposure, please feel free to review the kit, and discuss any and all amenities included for each sponsor. Thank you for taking the time to discuss the 1995 Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival sponsorship opportunities with us, and I look forward to many more conversations. Since ely, General Manager Tradition ,Since 19~3" TOURISM TENT THE CITY OF SPONSORSHIP TEMECULA PROPOSAL $7,500.00 THE TOURISM TENT WILL SHOWCASE OUR FINE VALLEY AND OFFER REASONS TO RETURN TO EITHER LIVE OR PLAY. YOUR ORGANIZATIONS NAME CAN BE SEEN HOSTING THIS FANTASTIC NEW THIS VENUE. BANNER AT ENTRANCE OF THE TOURISM TENT ONGOING SLIDE PRESENTATION OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY 15 TICKETS TO EVENT 6 VIP PASSES 4 VIP PARKING PASSES 1/2 PAGE ADVERTISEMENT IN OFFICIAL PROGRAM i BALLOON RIDE 2 TETHERED BALLOON RIDES NAME ON OFFICIAL FLYER OF FESTIVAL ( + 1 O0,000 ) FESTIVAL SOUVENIR GUEST AT MEDIA EVENTS DISCOUNT TICKETS AVAILABLE FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING 27475 Ynez Road. Suite 335 · Temecula, California 92591 · 1909) 676-4713 J ] 1 B~I~Z NOI~V~PgO~NI II i "A Tradition Since 1983" 1995 TEMECULA VALLEr BALLOON AND FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION SPONSOR LETTER OF AGREEMENT WINE CITY OF TEM~CULA hereby agrees to be a Sponsor of the 1995 Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. As a MAIN-TOURISM TENT Sponsor, I understand that I will receive the benefits as set forth in the exhibit attached hereto. I further understand that sponsorship benefits will not be provided and this agreement will not be binding on the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association until this agreement is executed by the sponsor in the space provided below. In return for receiving these benefits, I agree to contribute $ 7,500.00 , in cash or in services approved by the Temecula V~lley Balloon and Wine Festival Association. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association reserves the right to change the date or location of the Festival if deemed necessary, however, this agreement shall remain in effect. The festival may be held rain or shine, with no refunds unless the Festival is canceledby the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. The Sponsor's participation shall be subject to uniform rules and regulations set forth by the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association for Sponsors of the event. Deadline for inclusion of Sponsor in all printed material is March 15, 1995. Sponsors paying fees after that date will be included only in material printed after that date. I have read and agree to the terms stipulated in this Letter of Agreement: SPONSOR: Name RON BRADLY Company CITY OF TEMECULA Title CITY MANAGER Address 43174 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE City/State TEMECULA, CA 92589 Phone (909) 694-1989 Accepted by Date Payment terms for cash sponsorships: 50% upon signing this agreement $ 3,750.00 50% 90 days after signing. 27475 Ynez Road. Suite 335 · Temecula, California 92591 · (909) 676-4713 ~,a_,f~e Sl~inner east of ~emecufa cJ]escriptiort 'A bouqua of rosa - the '~fabulous -feai~al" award - to the organizers and all the sponsors of the Temecula Valley Balloon and W'me Faavat . 'a'~ns CAtJFORNIAN NEW~PAPgR' ('Every year the Temecula Valley hosts a colorful party with hot air balloons, wine tasting and two full days of musical entertainment. It's the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, and for the last 11 years this event has mesmerized hundreds of thousands of people with its kaleidoscope of sight, tastes and sounds for the senses. Its started in 1984 with a small group of volunteers from the Temecula Chamber of Commerce. A perfect blending of the emerging wine country and the splender of hot air balloon flights in the crystal blue skies initiated the event. Word that the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival is one of the most colorful and unj" ;vents in Southern California rapidly spread. 1994 broke attendance records with over 35,~ attendees over the two days, and received overwhelming coverage and unanimous praise from the media. A cooperative program with KNX 10.70 News Radio, and a four-hour live broadcast with Mark and Brain on KLOS 95.5 FM highlighted the marketing campaign. 1995plans include an aggressive marketing program which will provide sponsors with: publicity, a mass media blitz of advertising andpromotions, specialpromotional events, on-site sign age and cooperative marketing programs with national food manufacturers, grocery stores, radio and print media. TheTemeculaValley Balloon andWine Festival will take place Friday April 28, Saturday April 29th, and Sunday April 30th. We are preparing for increased attendance of over 40,000 people. Building on the popular "festival within a festival", the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival will offer eight mini festivals--each with its own visual character and atmosphere: Wine Tasting, Bal!oons, Musical Entertainment, Western Village, Kids Corner, Arts & Crafts Fair, Commercial Court, and the Health Fair. yesti' af A tractions 8 ~ni ~Festi~afs within a ~:esti-~af ~w,,~ ~'a~tin0 12 LocAL WINERIES OFFERING WINE TASTING ALL DAY AS WELL AS JAZZ MUSICANS TO ENTERTAIN AND SET THE MOOD. cBo. f[oorts OvER 50 COLORFUL HOT AIR BALLOONS WITH A MASS ASCENSION, EvENING BAL- LOON GLOWS, TETHERED BALLOON RIDES. ~,V~usicaf cEnteHainment OvER 8 HEADLINER MUSICAL GROUPS ON THE MAIN STAGE BOTH SATURDAY AND SUNDAY. PROVIDES MUSIC, DANCING AND FOOD FROM THE OLD WEST. cr-Las wILL FEATURE A CIRCUS, GAMES, ANIMAL RIDES, PETTING ZOO AND ON-GOING EN- TERTAINMENT. Arts & C,-,qts FAIR WILL FEATURE OVER 100 FINE ARTISTS AND CRAFTSMEN. C ommet'ciaf Court WILL SHOWCASE THE MERCHANTS AND BUSINESS IN TOWN, AS WELL AS TOURIST INFORMATION. cHeaftfi ~yair /THE TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON AND WINE FESTIVAL'S MOST POPULAR FEATURE WITH OUR SPONSORS IS THAT I, VE OFFER A FESTIVAL WITHIN A FESTIVAL. WE BOAST :: SEVERAL MINI-FESTIVAL AREAS EACH OFFERING UNIQUE AMBIANCE, FOOD AND ~ENTERTAINA, IE~VT/ A tendance 992-* 994 1992 16,000 1993 24,000 1994 35,000 Temecula Valley Balloon ~d Wine Fe~ival beg~ ~ 1984 * *~ojected a~endance Br 1995 is 40,000. c])emoOrapfiics A RANDOM SAMPLING OF THE AUDIENCE IN 1994 PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STA- TISTICS: q sidentid P oj fe RIVERSIDE COUNTY 56% TEMECULA/MURIETTA 38% REMAINING R.C. 18% SAN DIEGO 18% LOS ANGELES COUNTY 20% ORANGE COUNTY 6% Additional cDemoflrapfiic Statistics: WOMEN MEN AVERAGE AGE AVERAGE INCOME AVERAGE GROUP SIZE CAUCASIAN HISPANIC AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN OTHER 53% 47% 36 YEARS OLD $43,300 3.1 62% 21% 9% 6% 2% q dio d et'tisinO The Tem ecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival has arranged cooperative advertisingprograms for Festival Sponsors which work in conjunction with our advertising budget. Sponsors can enhance their exposure and marketing benefits by utilizing cooperative rates provided b.v these stations and the Festival. These stations have been chosen for market penetration, targeted demographics, and based on past performance for the event. KNX A.M. 10.70 NEWS RADIO KNX dominates the drive time market for 35 to 64 year old adults in the Los Angeles and Orange County markets. In 1994, the Festival, and KNX worked in conjunction with Galaxy Foods, Alta Dena Foods, Estrella Mexican Cheeses, and RoWs Foods to enhance the wine fair venue and promote the festival. Jim Thornton, the afternoon traffic air watch reporter, also served as the Festival's honorary balloonmeister and provided air check-ins during the event. KNX has designated the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival as one of three southern California events promoted and artended by the crew of the Food News Hour. (Other events are the Food News Cruise and Ports of Call Food Festival) This partnership provides added value for our sponsors with cooperative advertising rates and Festival purchased advertising. KLOS 95.5 FM KLOS and the morning team of Mark and Brian are one of the top rated stations in the Southern California. They dominate the adult 18-35 year-old market. In 1994, Mark and Brian produced a four-hour live broadcast from the Festival grounds which increased attendance figures, particularly for our entertainment venue. Plans for 1995 include cooperative advertising programs, Festival purchased advertising time, and promotions. ADDITIONAL STATIONS WHERE PROMOTIONS AND/OR COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING PROMOTIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED: KBEST 95 FM KOLA 99.9 FM KZLA 93.9 FM KRTM FM 88.9 FM KXEZ 100.3 FM SAN DIEGO - OLDIES INLAND EMPIRE ~ OLDIES L.A./ORANGE COUNTY COUNTRY LOCAL PUBLIC RADIO COMMUNITY STATION L.A./ORANGE COUNTY For details, schedules and rates please contact the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival (909) 676-4713 9-3tint Ad ert isin[t The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival has arranged advertising programs with the following publications : PRESS ENTERPRISE: Riverside County Publication 171,396 Daily Circulation CALIFORNIAN: Southwest Riverside County Publication 13,000 Daily Circulation HOMEBUYERS GUIDE: Southern Califorma Glossy Specialty Magazine Targeted to Temecula Area Visitors and New Home Buyers 15,000 Circulation Monthly BARGAIN BULLETIN: Southwest Riverside County Publication Direct Mailer - A Subsidiary of ABC/CAP CITIES 136,708 Circulation Weekly ABC/CAP CITIES PENNYSAVER Southern California Direct Mailer 1,256,231 Circulation Weekly AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Southern Californian Travel Saver Avenues and Westways Combined Circulation: 50,000 monthly for Travel Saver 3.8 million monthly circulation for Westways kdditionaf z d ertisin0 and v arketinO CABLE TELEVISION: Inland Cablevision will be conducting a contest throughout Temecula. Mumeta. Hemet and San Jacinto. This contest is sponsored by advertisers and encourages viewers to enter the contest at the advertiser's store. Winners receive a V.I.P. day at the Festival. Inland has 40,000 subscribers in the TemeculaJMurrieta area. The Balloon and Wine Festival contest and advertiser' s promos for the contest air on the following: ESPN, CNN, TNT, USA, LIFETIME, MTV AND PRIME TICKET This campaign exceeds 100 spots per day, over a three week period prior to the festival. Over 100,000 ~yers are printed and distributed through various channels, including McDonalds and major grocery stores, GROCERY STORE PROMOTIONS: In-store displays featuring the Balloon and Wine Festival and Temecula Wine County are established one month prior to the event. In addition, fiyers are distributed as bag stuffers and cooperative marketing with "bottle neckers" and in-store promotions are planned. cO a[[e ponsorsfiip $250 TO $1,000 +cBaffoon (Banner Sponsor +(Bus (Banner Sponso, -~Goff Cart Sponsor · .~o~ Sponsor +qnfovrrtation (Booth Sponsor · +Souvenir (Bootfi Sponsor THE ABOVE SPONSORSHIPS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: TICKETS TO THE FESTIVAL VIP PASSES VIP PARKING TETHERED BALLOON RIDES FESTIVAL SOUVENIRS NAME RECOGNITION IN OFFICIAL PROGRAM imar' ponsov $1,500 TO $3,000 *~postev Sponsor +cOqSp ff~nt Sponsor Sponsor +~iS~e-Sfiirt Sponsor +q~ds qr, pfner Stal3e Sponsor +eWestern Sta~e Sponsor +~cket Sponsor +~:ood Court Sponsor +~r)vomotionaf ~vim Sponsor +ovV~ne Cotass Sponsor +5o-a~ StaOe Sponsor +qn-~cind Sponsor THE ABOVE SPONSORSHIPS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: TICKETS TO THE FESTIVAL VIP PASSES VIP PARKING TETHERED BALLOON RIDES FESTIVAL SOUVENIRS NAME RECOGNITION IN OFFICIAL PROGRAM NAME ON FESTIVAL FLYER (+100,000) NAME ON ALL PRINT ADVERTISING BANNER IDENTIFICATION WHERE APPLICABLE COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING IS AVAILABLE TO ENHANCE YOUR MARKETING PROGIL~M. THIS WILL INCLUDE 30/30 RADIO SPOTS ON THE FOLLOWING RADIO STATIONS: KLOS FM KOLA FM KZLA FM KBEST FM KXEZ FM KRTM FM 95.5 L.A./ORANGE COUNTY 99.9 INLAND EMPIRE 93.9 L.A./ORANGE COUNTY 109.5 SAN DIEGO 100.3 L.A./ORANGE COUNTY 88.9 TEMECULA VALLEY For rates and information please contact the Festival office at (909) 676-4713 ~-Commercio/Court *cW'me ~air +cOalIe,/C~ow +(~2)ro~.am Co'~,er +eWestern cOiffage · ~U~.ain Stage ~-~ourism ~e.t THE ABOVE SPONSORSHIPS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING.' TICKETS TO THE FESTIVAL VIP PASSES VIP PARKING BALLOON RIDES FESTIVAL SOUVENIRS ADVERTISMENT IN OFFICIAL PROGRAM PREMIER EXHIBIT SPACE NAME ON FESTIVAL FLYERS (100,000+) NAME IN ALL PRINT ADVERTISMENT BANNER IDENTIFICAION AT VENUE RADIO ADVERTISING (30/30 SPOTS) ICN'X KLOS KBEST KZLA KFROG KABC KRTM KOLA COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING IS AVAILABE TO ENHANCE YOUR MARKETING CAMPAIGN. THIS INCLUDES 30/30 RADIO SPOTS ON THE FOLLOWING RADIO STATIONS: KLOS FM KOLA FM KELA FM ICNX AM KBEST FM KXEZ FM KRTM FM 95.5 L.A. 99.9 INLAND EMPIRE 93.9 L.A. 10.70 L.A. 109.5 SAN DIEGO 100.3 L.A./ORANGE COUNTY 88.9 TEMECULA VALLEY For rates and information contact the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival at (909) 676-4713. · BALLOON RIDES AND RADIO ADVERTISING ARE NOT INCLUDED IN ALL SPONSORSHIP PACK.~GES. YOUR ORGANIZATION WILL PRESENT THE 1995 TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON AND WINE FESTIVAL; Your organization's name will be associated as the Presenting Sponsor in all printed material publicity, press releases and PSAs distributed to over 180publications including newspapers, magazines, direct mail advertisers, radio and television news and enter- tainme?it including: THE CALIFORNIAN, PRESS ENTERPRISE. SAN DIEGO UNION, ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER. L4 TIMES. BL4DE CITIZEN, OP~4NGE COUNTY NEWS, IRVINE WORLD NEWS, VICTORVILLE TRIBUNE, TUSTIN CITY NEWS, ANAHEIM BULLETIN, FALLBROOK ENTERPRISE, TIMES ADVOCATE, CORONA NORCO INDEPENDEN'I~, BARGAIN BULLETIN, PENNYSAVER, HOMEBUYERS GUIDE, AUTO CLUB, OP,~4NGE COAST MAGAZINE, SENIOR HIGHLIGHT MAGAZINE, SUNSET, WINE TRADE, WINE ENTHUSIASTS, WINE SPECTATOR, GOODTIMES GAZETTE, SKY MAGAZINE, WHERE MAGAZINE, KOREAN TIMES, INTERNATIONAL TIMES, INL4ND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN, FOCUS, TEMPO, ETC. Ad-:ertksin~]: CONDUCTED EIGHT WEEKS PRIOR TO THE EVENT IN THE FOLLOWING PRINT MEDIA: · THE PRESS ENTERPRISE, THE CALIFORNIAN, THE BARGAIN BULLETIN, HOMEBUYERS GUIDE AND ABC CAP/CITIES PENNYSAVER. COMBINED CIRCULATION EXCEEDS 2 MILLION. · FESTIVAL FLYERS (100,000+) · RADIO GIVEAWAYS (2000) · NAME ON OFFICIAL POSTER (CONTRACT MUST BE SIGNED BY SEPTEMBER) · NAME ON COVER OF PROGRAM (10,000) cl~dio AdYertisin~: WILL INCLUDE 60 AND 30 SECOND SPOTS WITH 30 SECOND AND 15 SECOND DONUTS FOR THE FESTIVAL RESPECTIVELY. STATIONS CHOSEN HAVE A REACH FROM VENTURA COUNTY TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY. TOTAL AUDIENCE REACH EXCEEDS 3.5 MILLION. RADIO ADVERTISING WILL INCLUDE SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STATIONS: KNX KLOS KBEST KABC KOLA KRTM KXEZ KZLA Additional (Exposure & Amenities: FULL PAGE AD IN OFFICIAL PROGRAM V1P PASSES VIP PARKING PUBLICATION RIGHTS OF FESTIVAL LOGO IN YOUR MARKETING PROGRAMS BANNER AT ENTRANCE OF FACILITY BALLOON RIDES PREMIER EXHIBIT SPACE OVERNIGHT VIP ACCOMMODATIONS BOTH FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT -; (NOT EXCEEDING FOUR ROOMS) TICKETS TO EVENT ~'~ ~ ~fc,~ision ~oraotions: KABC-CHANNEL 7 NEWS 5:30PM AND 6:00PM KNBC-TRAVEL NEWS HOUR OCN-CABLE NEWS STATION INLAND CABLE-VISION (ADVERTISING VALUED AT $10,000-PROVIDED AN AVERAGE OF 100, 30 SECOND SPOTS PER DAY.) Tnmla Tom mciation TO: FROM: DATE~ City of Temecula Community Service Temecula Town Association August 25, 1994 Funding Program Committe~ The Temecula Town Association understands that the City Staff has been directed by City Council to develop a method for major community events to obtain $10,000.00 sponsorships from the City due to the superior promotional value of those events. The Temecula Town Association has sta~ed the Annual Tractor Race for 18 years. This event has been successful in bringing many thousands of visitors to Temecula who readily sample our areas hospitality and services. In addition the services and materials purchased or rented by the Temecula Town Association to put on the event stlmulate the local economy. Our event draws from a very wide area within the State of California as well as Arizona, Nevada and Utah. The Temecula Tractor Race as well as the Rod Run are the major events held within the City limits which have a proven track record of promotional value. On the weekend of our event the tourism trade fills the motels and restaurants and greatly increases store foot traffic as the visitors purchase goods and services. Because of these benefits to the City as a whole the Temecula Town Association, as a non-profit charitable organization, requests consideration for inclusion in the City's promotion/development budget. Thank you for your consideration. RO. Box 435 Temecula, CA 92593 (909) 676-4718 Fax(909) 694-9216 Ternecula Community Center 28816 Pujol Street Temecula, CA 92590 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (Please Print or Type} Amount Requested: $ 1 R / AAA Project Name: Ni nPtPPnth Annna 1 Project Starting Date: Nnv~mhp~, 1 Project Ending Date: October 30, ORGANIZATION'S BACKGROUND: 1995 Name of Organization: me~="ull To,.,n ~sEo~ittio~ Mailing address: 1~oct Of£ioc Box 435 Telephone: (909) 676 ~718 Number of paid staff ~ Geographic area(s) served m=rn~t~ ~ = ~ver~it]~ r"o~lDty, T.~S ~ngel~ rounty (Vpnr]nr~ Alan rnrn. frnm AriTnnR ~n~ flf~h, a~ w~ll Is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization? Yes × No If "yes": Date of incorporation as a non-profit_Lucjm.st 31.~_:J qn4 Year Founded 1 q?n Number of volunteers ' q:=,. n~rJn Pnr, n~ry, ~ CBlifnrnia) If "no": Name of sponsoring organization Its federal identification number Its state identification number application has been authorized by the organization's: Board o~ D~rectors Executive Committee Board of Directors Members-at-large Federal identificati on hum bar 95 - 3741422 State identification number n- n q q ~ 4 ~ n Include a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California AUG 2 5 La34 I C a o nla OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE I, MARCH FONG EU, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: That the annexed transcript has been compared with the record on file in tbi~ office, of which it purports to be a copy, and that same is full, true and correct. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great Seal of the State of California this AUG 3 11-0~4 SeeretanJ of State NDORSED FILED Jls the ofRce ef the Secrelory el State ef the State of Colj(orn~ AUG 2 9 1984 ~ FONG EU, ~ of S~ ~ ~MES ~ HA~' CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION Duane A. Balfanz, President and Patricia J. Patton, Secretary cert~fy: 1. That we are the President and the Secretary, respectively of Temecula Town AssOciation, a California corporation. 2. That the Articles of Incorporation of Temecula Town Asso- ciation shall be amended to read as hereinafter set forth in full: AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION The name of the corporation is Temecula Town Association. II. PURPOSES This cor~ration is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The public and charitable pur- poses of the corporation are to operate a nonprofit organization for the preservation and maintenance of the town site of "Temecula", the restoration and maintenance of the town site of "Temecula" and to provide for the entire con~nunity, a community center and other community facilities and services. - 1- III. ELECTION OF CORPORATION This corporation elects to be governed by all of the pro- visions of the Nonprofit Corporation Law effective January 1, 1980, not otherwise applicable to it under Part 5 thereof. IV. DIRECTORS That the number of Directors of this Corporation shall be seven (7) and the names and addresses of the persons who are appointed to act in the capacity of Directors until the selection of their successors are as follows: R. J. REININGER ROBEEl W. MAJESKI BUD SCHROEDER NELDA F. MAJESKI DON J. ANDERSON LEROY E. WOLVERTON JACK A. BUCK P.O. Box 326 P.O. Box 192 P.O. Box 126 P.O. Box 192 P.O. Box 254 P.O. Box 13 P.O. Box 831 Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula California California California California California California California V. BYLAW PROVISIONS % (a) Directors. The manner in which Directors shall be chosen and removed from office, their qualifications, power, duties, com- pensation, and tenure of office, the manner of filling vacancies on the Board, and the m~ner of calling and holding meetings of Directors, shall be as stated in the Bylaws. (b) Members. The authorized number, if any, and qualifications of members of the corporation, the filling of vacancies, the dif- ferent classes of membership, if any, the property, voting, and other rights and privileges of members, and their liability to dues and assessments and the method of collection, and the termination and transfer of membership shall be as stated in the Bylaws. VI. DEDICATION AND DISSOLUTION (a) The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated to public and charitable purposes and no part of the net income or assets of this organization shall ever inure to the benefit of a7 director, officer, or member thereof, or to the benefit of any vate persons. - 2 - (b) On the dissolution or winding up of the corporation, its assets remaining after payment of, or provision for payment of, all debts and liabilities of this corporation shall be distributed to a nonprofit fund, foundation, or corpora=ion which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes and which has es- tablished its tax-exempt status under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). (c) If this Corporation holds any assets on trust, or the corporation is formed for charitable purposes, such assets shall be disposed of in such manner as may be directed by decree of the superior court of the county in which the corporation has its prin- cipal office, on petition therefor by the Attorney General or by any person concerned in the liquidation, in a proceeding to which the Attorney General is a party. VII. CHARITABLE PURPOSE This corporatign.is organized exclusively for charitable pur- poses within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev- enue Code of 1954. Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, the corporation shall not carry on any other activities not permitted to be carried on by (a) a corporation exempt from Federal Income Tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal. Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provision of any future United States In- ternal Revenue law) or (b) by a corporation, contributions to which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Rev- enue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provision of any future United States Internal Revenue Law.) VIII. LIMITATION ON CORPORATE ACTIVITIES No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall consist of the carrying on of propoganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, nor shall this corporation participate or in- tervene in any political campaign (including publishing or distribu- tion of statements) on behalf of any candidate for public office. 3. That the amendment has been approved by the Board of Directors and the required vote of the members. 'PATRICIA J., PATTON, Secretary Declaration Each of the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that the statements contained in the foregoing Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation are true of his or her own knowledge and that this declaration was executed on July 27, 1984, at Temecula, California. PAetal-y - 4 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA '*'~.'-~NCHISE TAX BOARD 8,MENTO, CALIFORNIA 95867 h,,_ch q, 1985 P. O.BoX q35 2emscula0 CA 92390 In Xaply re:Ear to 3q2zAPP:KY:dhzg Form o~ Organ~;ation z Ac~ouzs~ing Period ~nd~ng: Organization Humbox ; Char:Ltable Dicember 31 0S96~18 On ~he has.is o~ ~che in:Eo=mation submitted and provided your present operations con~inue unchanged or conform ~o ~hoxe proposed in you= application, you are axemp~ ~rom 2~2~2 ~=~nch~se or ~ncoma tax unde~ Section 23701d, ~evenua end ~Ix~tion Code. lny change In operation, character or purpose o! ~ha organ~=~tion must b% reported lmmedlatal~ to this o~ice so ~h~ ue may determine ~ht s~act on your exempt s~a~us. AnF change o~ name or address also mus~ be reported. ~re =squired to {ale Form 199 (Exempt Oxganization Annual ~ ormation Re~urn) or Form ~99~ (ZKempt Or~anizaticn Annual . .ormation ~a~emen~) on or before the 1S~h day o~ ~he 5th month |/2 months) a~te= the close o~ ~our accounting period. See annual ~nstru&~ions Nith ~o=ms ~,or requirements. You $re not =equixed to ~ile state £ranchise o2 income tax returns unlees ~ou hera income subject ~o She unrelated huxiness income tax under Section 237~ o~ the Code. In ~his e~an~o ~ou art required ~o ~le Form ~09 (E~emp~ or~ani=atien BueineEs Income TaN ~eturn) b~ the ~h day o~ ~he 5th month (~ ~/2 months) t~ter the close o~ your annual ecuoun~n2 period. I~ ~he orgeni:etion is incorporating, this approval will aMpira unless ~ncorporation is completed ~th ~he Secretary o~ S~ate ~ithin ~0 days. Z~emption ~rom ~ederml income or other tn~es and other state requires separate applications. COPY ~ch ~, 1985 ~e~ecuZ~ ~o~n ~ssoc~a~ion Corporate Hu~bez 0596~8 ~he ~in~l d~ezAlni~£on let~e~ ~o ~he T~nchise ~x ~oazd Within 9 Z~s exerap~ion e~ee~ive as of Febzuszy S, 198q. D. H~zeid, Supezvisoz Central ~udi~ S~c%ion City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program ADDlication Page 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Based on your organization's last fiscal year) Balance Sheet as of Asset Cash and Investments Receivables (detail) ,Tnn~ tr) t I clc~4 ( See Attached Sheets ) Liabilities & Investments Current peyables $ Notes Payable Inventory FixedAssets Other Assets Total Assets Fund Balance Total Liability & Fund Balance $ .... ome Statement for the Year Ended g~ane 30 Income Fundraising $ Foundation grants United Way $ Government Funds $ Other sources $ 1994 (See Attached Sheets) Salaries $ Operating expenses $ Community services0 Amount sent to national/parent organization $ Other expenses $ Please note with an asterisk any amounts that require additional explanation, and comment on these items. In addition, please attach the organization's most recent treasurer's report, financial statements and footnotes. (It does not require a CPA's audit, but please submit if available.) TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. 0. BOX 435, TEMECULA, BALANCE SHEET' [:,ATE POSTE[, : JUNE 30:. 1994 PERIOD ENDING: JUNE :3lZ~? !'P94 C:A · 92592 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH ON HAND CASH IN BANK TOTAL CLIRRENT ASSETS 100.00 Ii,9:E:5.20 i 2, O:E:5.20 FIXED ASSETS EQU I F'MENT LAND BUILi:.INGS EVEN]'' PROF'ERTY LEASEHOLE:, IMPROVEMENTS AUTO & TRUCK OFF l CE FURN I TURE E:OMMUNI TY CENTER MISC. FIRE REPLACEMENTS COPYRIGHT FEES TOTAL FIXEL, ASSETS 24,625.5:3 100,78E..00 47,423.86 153,016.49 13,740.65 4,385.00 7,465.18 434,101.8:3 9,613.36 '797.007.90 OTHER ASSETS INSTALLMENT NOTE INSTALLMENT NOTE TOTAL CITHER ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS L-':6,097. :S::_-': 106,121. '~'? 192,219. 1,001,312.97 LiABiLITIES CLIRRENT LIABILITIES FICA WiTHHELl-' FWT WITHHELl:, SWT WITHHELD SIC:,Z WITHHEL[, SALES. TAX PAYABLE _r:.EPOS ITS ]'OTAL C:LIRRENT LIABILITIES 254.74 110.00 8.26 4:3.30 64.97 1,550.00 2, 0:31.27 LCING TERM LIABILITIES LOAN-i:,AVII:, &: C:AROL CARSON LOAN-r:,ENI:.'~ INVESTMENTS I:,EFERRED GAIN ON LANI:. TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES 192,401. :B4 50,000.00 72, 6i.E.. 10 CAFI TAL TOTAL L. ABIL!TIES I T'FA RETAINEr:, EARNINGS INCOME PROF i T /LOSS TOTAL C:AP I TAL 740, 5]0. _::'-] 'SE., -:..n~ ~ :" ~ 'FOTAL LIABiLiTiES & CAPITAL PREF'AREI:, BY: BIRDSALL' S :315,067.94 :317,099.21 684,2i 3.7~ 1,001,:312.97 BOOKKEEF' I NG SERvI CES TEMEC:LJLA 'TC~NN L:A. INCOME [:'LIES USAGE USAGE- SEC:LIR I TY USAGE -CLEAN I NG TV F'RCiGRAi~I RENT M I SCELLANEOIJS B I NGCi BREAKOPENS POOl:, C:C~PlPl I SS l ONS B I NGO- P,11 SC:ELLANEOUS DRIVER ENTRIES PROGRAPl SC~UVENIRS VENDORS TOTAL INCOME F~3ST OF SALES I NGO JREAk:OF'EN6 ~'11SC:ELLANECH.I6 TOTAL CCIST OF SALES GRC SS PROF t T ~SSOCIATION. P. O. BOX 435, TEPlECLILA. INCOME STATEMENT C:ONSOL I DATED STATENENT L,~TE POSTEI, : JLINE 30, 1994 PERIOD ENDING: JUNE 30? i994 CURRENT % YEAR-TO-DATE 1. 020.00 2.9 2. 760.00 86.7.50 2.5 :E:, 2:E::3.10 .00 .0 66.0. o2 114.00 .3 1,149. Ot,]~ 300.00 .9 !, 500.00 i, I75.00 3.4 4, :341.00 120.00 . :3 1 , 492.00 1:?., 778.00 54.0 96, ',~:02.00 10,0E::3.25 29.0 51,940.25 .00 .0 92.00 154.50 . 4 845.50 90.00 . :~ 90.00 1,605.00 4.6 2, E,E.O. 00 :32.4:3 . 1 902. ?:3 455.00 1..3 5. 970.00 34,794.6',B 100.0 179, 4E:8.20 .00 .0 I, 083.88 :3. i .00 .0 1,063.88 3.1 33.730.80 96.9 1,062.41 4,317 · 45 154.82 5,534.68 17:3,953 · 52 4,6. .4 . F: 5 :'_-.. 9 2R. 9 .1 .5 .1 1.5 :3.3 ,6 2,4 ,1 · 3, 1 96,9 EXPENSES ADVERTISING & PROMOTION BAD DEBTS BANK CHARGES BLEACHERS C:ASH OVER/SHORT CHILI CC,]K OFF CONTRACT SERVICES CONT I NGENC i ES DONA T I [INS - SERV ICES DUES ,'..~ PUBLICATIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL ! NSURANCE-GENERAL LEGAL .%= PRORESSIONAL L'iC:ENSES & PERMITS hl I SCELLANEOUS "eFF!CE SUPPLIES RiNTING PR I ZES -BREAKOPENS PR 1 Z E$ - C:ASH 1,028.75 3.0 288.00 .8 4.24 .0 250.00 .7 17.25 .0 .00 .0 2,710.00 7.8 50.0ei .1 .00 .0 90.00 .3 15~.15 .4 590.79 1.7 200.00 .6 50.00 .1 1.89 .0 406.75 1.2 60.00 .2 7,246.75 20.8 13,978.00 40.2 1.043.75 384.00 39.24 250.00 E, 9.00 72.02 17,540.00 50.00 60.9:3 140.00 1,405.35 E:.230.07 2,024.00 50.00 103· 24 1,349.2:~ 425.7] 38,523.00 72,567.00 .6 .2 .0 .0 9. .0 .1 4.6 i 1 1 L:: 2 21 5 40.4 TEMEC:LILA TOWN ASSOC:IATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, INCOME STATEMENT CCINSOLIZ.,ATEI. STATEMENT I:,ATE POSTE[:, : ..TUNE :30, ].994 PERIO[:, ENDING: JUNE :30, 1994 C A. Y 25 ~ :t CLIRRENT "/ YEAR'- TO-'/:,A TE F'RI ZES-NON-CASH 1 , 007.00 2.9 o: :]-'gE,. :L 2 3. ,::, R. EF'AIRS &MAINTENANCE l, 354.85 3. 'B ?. ?52. '?{, 4.4 RENT 140. ¢0 · 4 42G. C_~0 .2 SECLiRIT~r 4:S5.00 1 · 4 2,412.00 ]. SET-UF' .00 .0 (35.00! ,. SHERIFF ' S j[:,EPARTMENT 180.51 .5 1.2:27. '.B5 . 7 SOUYEN I RS 12S. 25 .4 54:3.25 . SUPPLIES 429.7:3 I. 2 2,20:3.04 i. 2 TAXES-PAYROLL .00 .0 E, 35.9:3 .4 TAXES-PROPERTY 614.90 i. 8 E, 14. 'BO . :_'-: TAXES-OTHER .00 .0 13I. 00 . TELEPHONE 239.72 .7 :=':52.08 · 5 TRASH I:,ISF'OSAL 157.48 .5 I, :-':73.87 1.0 TV-RROGRAM · 00 .0 1, E, 80.00 · 'B LITILITIES 84:3.45 2.4 5. 299. ~Z~7 3.0 WAGES i, 132.00 3.3 ~,, 1 i:E:. 00 .2',. 4 TOTAL EXPENSES :33,841 · 46 97..3 182,760.46 101 · ORERATING INCOME (LOSS) (110.66) <. 3) (S. :=:06. B4) ~4.9) OTHER INCOhlE INTEREST INL'-OME 7.05 .0 ~=:3.90 .0 TRLIST INTEREST INCOME 2, E,'.B~.. 63 7.7 7, 5:E:4.64 4.2 iNSLiRANCE REIMBURSMENT 3, :253.60 9. E, 3. 353.60 1. S 'FOTAL CITHER INL':O~dE E,,047.28 i7.4 ii,022.!0 c:,.1 OTHER EXF'ENSES iNTEREST EXF'ENSE LOAN FEES RREVIOUS Y'EARS EXPENSES C:BDG WRITE OFP TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES NET INCOME i, 630 · 00 4.7 '?, 9:32.74 5 · 5 · 00 .0 I, E. 00 · 00 . '? :305.04 .9 45, 14:3.87 25.2 · 00 .0 1,8:35. ~Z,',?. i. 0 1,9:35.04 5. ~. 58,512.2 'B :32.6 4,001.58 11.5 (SE,, 297.13) (:3i. 4) RRERAREI:, BY: BIRDSALL 'S BOOI<kZEEF'Ir,li'3 SER"-"iEE--- City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 3 Your 0rganization's Mission: Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. Include discussion regarding the specific ways your organization meets the City's criteria listed on I~age 2. (See Attached Statement) T cula Tom Auociatiou ORGANIZATION'S MISSION Our mission is spelled out in our Articles of Incorporation as a (501(S)(3) Non-Profit Charitable Organization. I~ney state specifically that our purpose is to preserve the place name Temecula (accomplished), to promote and maintain the circa 1890 architecture in Old Town iongoing) and to provide and operate a Community Center and other community facilities and services. We have provided major community services through our annual events. scholarship awards. and providin~ free use of the Community Center to the City of Temecula for City Council meetings. City Commission meetings, Community Services activities, County and State agencies, School functions and Sen~or Citizen activities and many more. EO. Box 435 Temecula. CA92593 (909) 676-4718 Fax (909) 694-9216 Temecula Community Center 28816 Pujol Street Temecula, CA 92590 City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program ~pplication Page 4 Project(s) needing funding How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the project's objectives, number of persons served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Please include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities related to this project. Please attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space. (See Attached $heet} City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 5 We hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and belief, (Sign both if same) AND NAME AND TITLE (Please Prim or Type) ~'~ignature and tile of individual preparing application form) JOHN STERLING PRESIDENT NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) ture and title of President or Authorized Officer) TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION (Organization Name) 28816 PUJOL STREET TEMECULA, CA. 92590 (Addressof Organization) 676-4718 AUGust 25, 1994 ~elephone) (Date) Return Completed Application to: City of Temecula Finance Department Community Service Funding Program 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-6430 ITEM 34 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Prepared By: APPRRO~~ ' CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning November 15, 1994 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Density John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review and Provide Direction to Staff BACKGROUND This item was last heard by the Council's at its October 11,1994. It has been placed on this agenda at the request of Councilmember Parks. Attached for the Council's review is additional correspondence from the applicant and property owner. DISCUSSION This item received moderate discussion at the October 11, 1994 meeting which resulted in two separate motions, both of which failed on a two-two vote. No representatives of the project applicant were present at the meeting. Additional material provided by the applicant re-states their position that the intent of the General Plan and the Council to grant the subject project a density of three gross dwelling units per acre. Staff has rewewed the new material and consulted with the City Attorney. Based on this, staff has not changed its position frorr the last meeting. Should the Council desire to assign a higher der. si:y to the subject project, please direct staff in the manner in which the density should be calculated. If the Council desires to retain staff's recommended calculation of density, the pro!ect proponent should be advised to apply for a General Plan Amendment. Attachments City Council Minutes, October 11, 1994 - Page 2 Letters from Applicant and Property Owner, October 19 and October 20, 1994- Page 3 Staff Report, September 27, 1994 - Page 4 Letter from The Keith Companies to the Director of Planning. August 30, 1994 - Page 5 Staff Letters Dated July 18 and August 15, 1994 - Page 6 Excerpts from City of Temecula General Plan - Page 7 R:\GEbrPLAI~ROP, I~AGH.CC3 11R/94 sdl ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, OCTOBER 11,19ed4 City Council Minutes October 11, 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to extend the meeting until 11:30 PM. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz RoriDauah Ranch Soecific Plan Density Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks stated he met with Roripaugh homeowners and the density change would only address Roripaugh Ranch and does not apply to all areas of the specific plan. Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the applicant thought he was receiving three gross units per acre. He stated he was advised by the City Attorney that a General Plan Amendment would be necessary to facilitate such a change. Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he would not be in favor of granting this exception. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Stone, seconded by Mayor Roberts to retain the density at three dwelling units per net acre. The motion failed by the following vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Roberts NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue the item to the meeting of November 15, 1994. 21. The motion failed by the following vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Roberrs NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz No action was taken as a result of a 2-2 tie vote. Minutes\ 10\I 1 \94 - 13- 11/07/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 i"rERS FROM APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER OCTOBER 19 AND OCTOBER 20, 1994 October 19, 1994 ROYAL-CLARK DEVELOPMENT CO. 280 SO BEVERLY DRIVE. SUITE 207 BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90212 (310) 278-0448 FAX (310) 550-1910 Mr. Gary Thornhill Mr. Saied Naaseh CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Density Formal Request to be placed on 11-15-94 City Council Agenda Gentlemen: By way of this letter, we formally request to be placed on the November 15, 1994 City Council Agenda. The purpose of our request is to have the council clarify what appears to be differing interpretations of the General Plan as it applies to this property's density. Our position is that Council clearly acted in August of 1993 to provide for three units per gross acre partially in appreciation of the significant amount of infrastructure that must be provided. In the meantime we will be meeting with staff and Council members and providing information in support of our inter- pretation. Also, please be aware that it is vitally important that we see the Council no later than the 15 of November. It may be that only the exact Council that adopted the General Plan could provide the clarification that we seek. Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated. General Partner GRC Development Company TFC:ph CC; Mr. Leo Roripaugh Mr. Sanford Edward The Keith Companies Mr. Gary Thornhill Mr. Saied Naaseh October 20, 1994 Page 2 We were not informed that the project &oplicant was having difficulties with staff regarding this issue until after the Septemeber 27, 1994 staff report had been released. Given that we had already reviewed this matter with the Council in 1993, our preference was to resolve this on a staff level by having the City Attorney review the facts. Apparently, the matter was brought before the Council on October 11th. We now look forward to providing you and the Council with additional materials and then, if necessary. resolving this issue at the November 15, 1994 meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, RORtPAUGH RANCHES, INC. Leo~oripaug~ MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENTS, INC. Sanford Edward SE/cb Enclosures CC: City Councilmembers Mr. Peter Thorson. City Attorney Mr. Thomas Clark MPD MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENTS Via Facsimile and U,S. Mall AuOust 20, 1993 IW. Gan/Th~Ttill 14'. John Meyer CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park: Drive Temecula. CA 92590 RE: Draft General Plan Land Use Designation Roripaugh Ranch, 800 acres Gemlemen: We are writing to corn the City Council's August 17, 1993 decision regarding the RoriOaugh Flan~ and the Citys Dralt Genera Ran Land USe aesignmion. At the meeting, we requested an overall demity of 2400 units (3 un~ Der a:~'e) sut)ject to an alX3roved Specific Plan. To ol3tmn that density, we asked ~r land use areas to De gNen a Low Medium designmjon, and tha~ the rex1 for ttte Ant~pmed Land Uses De mended to inciude Low Medium. It is our understanding thet the Council agreed to our reduest, providing we calX)ed our density a~ the 2400 unit level. We were hesitant to eataDlish an al)so~ute calling short of a Stoecific Plan analysis. hUt once we were informed thm overall target denStins inco~:x)rate a ten pement (10%) margin factor, we readily agreed to the request of Council and Sift. We would like to meet with Staff regarding the final sub-area land use designations. We will cornact you soon and recluest a meeting towards this end. Thank you for your cooOeration. Sincerely, MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENTS, Sanford Edward, President INC. SE/cD CC Leo Roril)augh Tom Cla'k [H \c~piirl L'cntcr Drl~c Suite 2 ) I · \cx~port Beach. CA 92661) · i7141 729-1500 · Fa\ 17 I-h 4~'..)-2752 Friday October 21,199~, 9:5/,am -- From ,3105~01910' -- Page Z~ SENT BY: 10-21-1M; 9:4~; ~ ~I~, ~-- ~;~ 2/10 ROYAL-CLARK DEVELOPMENT CO. 280 SO. BEVEKLY DRIVE, ~J~..- 337 BEVERLY HILLS, CAUFORNU~ 90212 (310) 278-044~ FAX (310) 550-1910 October 20, 1994 Mr. Gary Thornhill Mr. $sied Nuseh City of '~emec~ 43174 ]Business Park Drive Tene~d-, California 92590 Re: Roripaugh Ranch Spcci~c Plan Density Gm~emem: Regarding the City Council hearing of Tuesday, October 11, 1994, it was indicated by some Councilmembers that ~ey would like to see some substantiation supporting our claim th~ three units per gross acre is necessaty to make the project __,~,_nomically viable. To that end, w= offer, for your con~dcrmion, the following points describing the economic r~+l~es of the project that w= face. II Fhstly, it should be noted daat we are prcsc, ntly burdened with having to pay tax assessn~ents to Asse~saient District 161 for fac~t~es and pubtic improvements from which we will not benefit or for facilities that are now not schedul~ to be built. Additionally, as presented lest year during the General Plan hearing we ate faced with the respomu'bility of making serveral very costly off-site and on-sit~ infra.fa'~lctlafe and public facUiljes improvements as required to impleme~xt the City~ General Plan. Ther,~, hnprovoments include the following: Muftieta Hot Springs Reed will need to be improved off-site to at least Pouroy Road, possibly to Buttedleld Stage Road, without any assistance from .A~;..,ent Distxict 161; Butterfield Stage Road will need to be improved off-site from Rancho CAlifornia Road to Ihe project site without any City participation or landowner reimbursement agreements in place at this dine; ,Frlaay 0ctot)er 211 1~9/, 9:54am -- From #3105501910' -- Page 51 ~ BY: 10-21-~; 9:4~; ~ ~I~, ~.~ 90~;~ 3/10 A Connnuaity Park, in hnplemcnte~on of ~he City's Mas.r Plan for Parks, is required to be bin'It on-site; me A Middle School site and Elemettary School site are proposed withirt the project site, pres~atly without any a~reements as fee credits available to against the $10,000.00 per unit school fees tlutt are required to be paid; Over 100 acres of open space is being otfared to be d~dicaled to the Riverside County Habitat Consennttion Agency; Off-sit= water, st-w~r and storm drain improvements wiffiin Muftieta Hot Springs Road, Butterfleld Stage Road and the Nicolas Vadley arrx As sta~d earlier, wida the exception of the Elementary School site, all of the improvements ideag/ied above are called out in the City's General Plaax and are to s~ve and ben=fit a much larger population than just the Rodpnx,~h Ranch community. It should be noted ~at in the public hearings of last year, Councilman Parks reaffmned our need for three units per ~ro~ acre so a~ to be *able to pay for the improvements that we would have to put We believedrot the und~,~landing, intent and action of the Council last year was to destEn*re the Roripaugh Ranch at a density of three units per gross acre. This is borne out in Council providing *additional direction" with the Gcncral Plan that Koripaugh Ranch "shall not exceed an average of ~ree units per acrc'. We arc .~l~in~ now that that position be recon~rmcd and that staff and City Attorney be directed to make the appropriate adjustments to the General Plan to clarify the issue. h should also be noted that we are not requesting ~hnt the method for calculm~ng density be changed for the cotire City of TcmecuL~ We are requcs~ng that the "additional dincti~n" that was g~ven specifically to the Roripaugh Ranch property be clarified. Our request has no affect on any other property within the immediate area or the City of Temecula. We believe that Council has the authority a~d the abfiity to make the necc~m7 clerical changes to the General Pin doctmmnt as a "clean-up* measu~. The only modification to the General Plan document would be the changjug of one part of one sentence that relates Only to Roripaogh Ranch in Tablc 2-9, on pa~c 2-40 from *average* to 'gross*, as reiterated below:. ' .....aid sl~'l not e~ceeed ~. av4tr,_ga of th/ze dwelling units pet~ acre; ....... Hopefully we have idealifted the economic rmdilias that necessitated our request for three traits per gross acro at last year*s General Plan he3rings and that continue to face us today. If we can offcr any clarification to any of the points includcd herein, please do not hesitatc to call me at any time. Thank you for your ~++m~fion and consideration of this important matter. Endoscd for your informalion is some background material that substantiates our position that the intent and action of City Council last year was that Ro~paugh Ranch was to be dcveloped IFriday October 21, 1~94 ~:S&am :: From ,3105501910' -- Page SE~T BY: 10-21-~; ~:45~; ~ I~15.~, ~.- ~0~6~,6~77;# 4/10 On~ a~in, lhank you for your s.ss~us~,ce. Sincerely, General Partner GRC Development Company Mr. Leo Rodpaugh Mr. Sanford Edward The Ked~ Con'~oades ~ BY: 10-21-84; cJ:45AM; SAil, REISS, 5,-, 9096946477;# 5/10 ROR1PAUGH RANCH DENSITY l,qStrE Although quite uncommon, the Temecula General Plan does establish density using net acreage... we axe not arguing that point .... We do contend that the City Council did give "additional direction" to various Specific Plan parcels, including Koripaugh Ranch... That "additional direction" is in addition to the rest of the General Plan in that it is tailored to the unique situation of the property to which the "additional direction" is given..(Councilman Parks, 8/17/93, concurred that we "need flexibility ..... to allow higher densities in certain areas to pay for all the improvements that you are going to have to put in." THAT "ADDITIONAL DIRECTION" MAY, BY ITS VERY NATURE, BE DIFFERENT THAN THE DIRECTION GIVEN TO OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA...COUNCIL HAS THAT AUTHOR1TY ..... Tr_nnscrlpts'of the August 17, 1993 City Council hearing (attached) clearly show that the landowner representative, City staff and City Council were con.qidering (AND CITY COUNCIL APPROVED) a request for 3 units per gross acre (i.e. "overall" and "over the entire property") 3. l~sncho Bella Vista/Mountain View At the same Council hearing, Larry Lynch, spe.lcing for the property directly acjaccnt to Roripaugh Ranch, asked for confirmation that the Specific Plan was to be adopted into the City General Plan as is, i.e 3 units per g~_oss acre...; STAFF CONCIJRRED. 4. Johnson Kanch PIning staff concurs that Johnson Ranch, located adjacent to Roripaugh Ranch, was given direction at 1.5 units per gross acre The term "average" is used in the General Plan (Table 2- 9, p. 2-40) as part of the "additioval direction" given to specifically to Roripaugh Ranch The Planning Director has stated that that language would indicate that the General Plan, IN THAT PA_P~TICULAR INSTANCE, is dealing with GROSS acres...If it does not mean average of 3 units over the entire property...what does it mean? and why is it used nowhere else in the General Plan? As it relates to the September 27, 1994 Staff Report for this matter, Council does have the authority to establish specific direction to particular properties...Council did it last year in the General Plan process when it gave "additional direction" to various Specific Plan areas, including Roripaugh Ranch .... A GPA is not required to clarify Council's intent as it relates to this property. Friday OctoDer 21, 1994 9:54am -- From '~105501910' -- Page 7I ~ BY: 10-21-~; ~:4~; ~ ~!~, ~.~ ~;~ 7/10 Transcript of the Temecula City Council Hearing of August 17, 1993 Hogs: Request to rcopcn the public hearing to consider Ann 5, Nicohs Valley, and reeve public testimony Mayor. Public he:ring is reopened on Nicohs Valley, Am 5. We do bye three requests to speak. S. Edward- My name is Sanford Edward, 110 Newport Center Drive, representing Raripangh Ranch inc. Mayor, councilpe~ons, we are eaentia!ly a, klng that have a little deanup. Roripaugh Ranch is parcel no. g, the large pared on the screen. ~e hve two requesu. One revolves around the entire gO0 ac~s. The other revolves around jtmt the panhandle, which is 160 acres. Mayor:. It should be noted that the panhandle uea is in the City and the othe~ par~ is not inside the City, but within the Sphere. S. Edwaa: Coma. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that the land use be designated at 3 units per a~re overall. That was staffs recommendation. But the Planning Commission basically deferred and said the preferred to hav~ the landowner come in with a Specific Plan. We are in ag~emcnt with that. But then, subsequent to the Planning Commission, at loold, g at the maps and anticipated land uses, we are going to be precluded from the opportunity of coming before you at a later date with a Specific Plan and EIR that would mitigate any issues that would essent'nlly allow us to develop at 3 units to the acr~ So, in order to be able to do that, and not have to ask for a General Plan Amendment, we're requesting that one land use category be added to the anticipated land use, and that's the Low Medium land use.~.and that a couple of the areas which have a 0 - 5 degree slope be changed to a LM, Low Medium land use. All that wB! effectively do is allow us, when we do come back with a Spccific Plan, to try to get that overall 3 units per acre, which surf did recommend, and to be able to do so without having to go through a Gcnenl Plan Amendment. Mayor. Does staff agree with the conclusion of the speaker with respect to the impact of that r~quest? Do you want that repeated? G. Thornhill: I heard most of it. lt's hard to relate it m the kind of area that he's talking about. Thaes the only problem I have. How much of the property os h the 0 - 5% slope arca? l ~ BY: 10-21-~J4; 9:47~; ~ ~1~, ~.~ 90~;~ 8/10 On the kagc 640 acre parcel, I'd say approximately 40 to 50%. If we ,s~te to devdop, quotdunquote, at the m.'t~mum allowable designitlons, acoonfmg to the map as it exisu right now, we would end up with approximately 1000 units on 800 acres, which would be fir short of even staf~Ps n.'eommendasion of 3 uniu per acre. We basigally have 2 land use categories on the map as it exi:ts now. Tlut's Hillside Residential and Low Res;dmtlaL G. Thomh:'l]: 'l~is iS the first time that I am aware of this one. Did you write John 0aleyet) a let;c~? S. Edgtrd: Yes. I think that's whcre wc arc sufferlag from John's absence. We~atehi,n on both June 11 and July t4. G. Thomhm-- I remember the other properties, but not this one. Mayor. Does staff need more timc to sit down with the applicant? G. Thornhill: I think we need to report hack to the Council on this. Unformn.~gely, Mr. Meyer had a conversation that_.information..~(inau&'ble) Mayor Do you have a problem with that? S. Edvlrd: No, I don't have a problem with that Mayor.. Does Council have a problem with that? P. Birdsall: No. 8, then, wc are going to take out of this bunch. Is that correct? RighL G. Thornhill: [ think. conceptually, I don't have too much of a problem with this because of the slopes involved. Usually, you can develop at those densities on those slopes, but.. (inaudible) This will come back as a Specific Plan? G. l~homhilh Absolutely. You want some timabillty in the Specific Plan to allow some little bit higher densities in certain areas so you can pay for all the improvement, you are going to have to put in. S. Edgu'd: Exactly. We don't anticipate going beyond the 3 units per acre, but, as you're suggeating, there may bc some areas where development will take phce :~ a 2 10-21-94; 9:47AM; SALL REI&$, ES~.~ 9036~a,6477;~: 3/1.0 Mayon S. Edward: Mayor. larry I .yuch: L Lynch: Mayor. R. Stephens: ]Vlay'or: D. Hogan: much lower level But if we don't have the ~cxibillt7 in the arms that have less slope to get the density back, effectively the property won't be developable. Thcres on last issue, which is the second one, rll just rmmdon k in passing,' and that relates to the panhandle. That fight now has a c,,,,~at Assessment Disz~a ~ which is locked in at a basic rate. And we want m get the underlying maps It, conform to that Assessment District nt~. That is something we had discussed ~ith staff and they told us it ~ an overall policy, but this was one particular instance where they didn't realize it vra.s citing and we wenm't able to pick it up. OK. Again, I think perhaps thaes an issue that be further developed with surf and then when it comes back, we can address the total package. Thank you. Th~nk you very much. L~tvy Lynch addressing No. 61. Representing DL Equities, owner of Rancho Belh Vis~ I want to confirm that the Specie Plan, as adopted by the County', is to be *adopted, as is" as part of this General Plan. Szzff is nodding affirmativeb/. (Not appficablc) Richard Stephens, addressing Rofipaugh Ran&. Piehard Stephens, The Kcith Companies, representing Gentry Homes. We are in agreement with Mr. Edward's request. It'd llke to aL, o remind you that the site has numerous cmvironmental constr~nts and giving that little higher density allows for much more fle.va'bz'liry in !and phnnlng or crcativc solutions to problems. We did have one question, and that was the significance of the exhibit with the red coloring. It looks like, perhaps surf can ehrify this, that there was a request made on the ske for a Speci~c Plan designation that was denied. Am I misinccrprcdng the significance of this cchibit? Mr. HoKan? Yes. Thaes not a denM of a Specific Plan. That map only depicts the diffenmt land use rcquesu we havc received and whether or not there was a reeommendatlon to support it or oppose k. So, when a property owner comes in. he would be able to identify the property and identify what staffs Fric~ay 0ct~Der'2~ ,~994 9:5~,am -- From '~105501910' -- page {Oj SENT BY: 10-21-~; ~:48~; ~ ~1~, ~,- ~0~77;~1Q/10 EL Stepb~,~- Mayor:. D. Hogan: Mayor:. S. Edward- Parks: S. Edwaxd: IL Jackson: Mayol~. recommendation was ~ithout havhsg to look through a rather complicated nlatriX. Tb~,le you. All right, we have no other requeats to speak on tl~ group. Dave, do you want to proceed? Starting._ rm going to give the introduction to all thc properties included in here- And ['11 mention Item No. 8 as a matter of course, as the C~mneir$ position on that has already been made clear. One Moment. The orlginal general Phn for that area showed a combination of Open Spar. e, Hillside resldential and Low Density Reaidentisl. They requested Open I Iillside Residential, Low density and Low Medium density residential so that the total average density on the project would increase to 3 units per acre. After some discussion, Sta~ doesnat have any problems with making a dxage in had use density, with the uuder.~t:mdlng that the final density of the project, for the entire area, will not exceed 3 units per acre. We'd h'ke to make that recommendation to Council OIL Does the applicant feel OK with that, just for the purlms,'- of moving along? Yeah, that sounds good on the surface. I thought, prior to this, that the understanding ~ that staff wanted us to come in with a Specific PLan. And my concern is, let's say it saya we can yield 3.1 or something h'ke that. I hate to lock myself into a ceiling tight now. Like anybody involved in the process, thete's alway~s give ~md take and it seems h'ke I'm giving fight out of the chute and I don't even know what the ramifications are. So, I would ask for clarification just to be contingent upon the Specific Plan and rll get hammered then. I'll get beat up late. I think we need to have a target dcnfity though. We need k for trdfedeirculation, for all the other elements we have to deal with in the General Pha. And to me, we're changing from 2 to 3, and that seems to give you a lot of flexability. OK, alright, fair enough. Minor modifications of 10% one way or the other, which will give him 3.1, if that is a concern. Alrlghr, I think we have agreement and conenrrenee. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STAFF REPORT, SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: · APPRO~ CITY ATI~'_ORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager~7 Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning September 27, 1994 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Density Prepared By: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review and Provide Direction to Staff BACKGROUND The property owner representative and the specific plan applicant have requested that the City Council make a determination on the density of the subject specific plan proposal. The Planning Department has been working with new applicants of the subject Specific Plan since May, 1994. A formal planning application was received in August, 1994,forthe Specific Plan and Change of Zone. As previously stated, calculation of density has been an ongoing issue surrounding this project. Specifically, whether the 3 dwelling units per acre, as setforth in the General Plan is a gross density versus a net density. During the General Plan's public hearing process before the Planning Commission, a property owner representative requested that Roripaugh Ranch be granted an overall density of 3 dwelting units per acre. Staff concurred with the request but the Commission ultimately set the density at 2 dwelling units per acre. The Commission felt that the City would be better served if an increase in the density was considered concurrently with a Specific Plan proposal. Before the City Council, the property owner representative again requested that Roripaugh Ranch be granted an overall density of 3 dwelling units per acre. At its August 17, 1993 meeting the City Council granted the applicant's request. DISCUSSION When the General Plan was revised to reflect the changes made by the City Council (Pre-Final Edition, December 1993) the Key Objectives for Roripaugh Specific Plan (Table 2-9, Land Use Element, page 2-40) stated: "To develop a master planned residential community that provides a variety of housing types suited to the terrain and sha// not exceed an average of three dwe//ing units per acre; grading that is sensitive to natural landforms: and developrqent that protects sensitive natural resources of the area." The broperty owner's representative and the project applicant interpreted the term "average density" as to mean gross density over the entire 790 acre site. Shortly after meeting with the applicant in May, staff provided a follow-up letter outlining the steps that would be used by the Department to process the Specific Plan application. Based on a request from the applicant, staff wrote a letter On July 18, 1994 (attached for the Council's review), referencing the density, as stated above, and indicating how the General Plan provided for the calculating of density, Section IV.A.1 of the Land Use Element (page 2-23) states: "The maximum density defines the maximum number of units per net acre at which development can occur within a given area. Net acre is defined as the gross project or lot area, less that portion of the site to be used for the following: arterial, major, secondary and collector roads; and the floodway portion of a floodplain. Determination of precise density, development location, and tot coverage on any residential property is a function of: Opportunities and constraints presented by natural, cultural or scenic features; Policies and implementation programs of the General Plan intended to maximize public safety; achieve high quality site planning and design; provide sufficient levels of public service; retain significant natural resources; ensure compatibility between uses; and encourage development of Village Centers; Building and development standards contained in the Development Code. public works standares. and other regulations and ordinances." Subsecluent to receiving this let"ter, the specific plan application was submitted to the Planning Department. Again the preliminary maximum unit count was based on a gross acre density calculation. On August 15, 1994 another letter was issued by the Planning Department indicating that this was inaccurate and inconsistent with the General Plan. CONCLUSION The owner's representative and the specific plan applicant felt there was sufficient discrepancy in the record to warrant the City Council review of this issue. As a result, staff agreed to bring the issue before the Council. Staff believes the language under the Key Objective for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan does not contradict other portions of the Land Use Element and that calculating density is stated in a strait forward manner based on net density. Should the Council wish to revise the manner in which allowable density is calculated, it should direct staff to bring back a General Plan Amendment to revise the text of the General Plan. Such action will affect how density is calculated on a community wide basis. R:\GE,NPL.AJ~ROR.J]:eAGH,CC 9/19/~4 2 Attachments 1, Staff Letters Dated July 18 and August 15, 1994- Page 4 2. ExcerDts from City of Temecula General Plan - Page 5 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 4 L,-i i ER FROM THE KEITH COMPANIES TO THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AUGUST 30, 1994 5 THE KEITH COMPANIES* JN:,,A.\~ F. MPLu~, Mcrenc~ Va~ · Lace ~"Ls=or~ ·Pai= Dr. sen · 'v'i~oz~jlc Auj~s~ 30, 199~ ML G·~y Tbonbill, Planning Director City of Temecul· 4317,1 Business Park Drive Temecul· California 92590 Roripaugh Ranch - General Plan Consistency Deer Gs~! · Thank you for meetin8 wit~ Ric Stephens and me and littering to our thoughts about your ler~er to us, d~ed August 17, zegzrding the consiszency of our Specific Plan application with ltte Land Use Blemenz o~the Ternecttla General PImp. As you are aware, we are steadfast about the inzent of City Councll as well as the ··ion that Ci~ Council took. last year as it relates to the maximum number of' dwelling units permit'red on the goripat~h Ranch property. Please consider the following points regarding our position: While acknowledSinl the lmn~,,_~e in the 'Cr~nenl Plan that identifies net acre~ as ~ze basis for calculating density, the General Plan subsequently goes on 1o provide 'additional directionN to Specific Plan ereas, including J.oripaugb Ranch, wherein it states that Roripzugh l~tch shall not exceed a maximum avenge of three dwelling units per ante; Johnson Fanch was given direction by City Council dunng last yesr's General Plan process. Said direction was that Johnsun .P, anch was entitled to 1.5 dwelling units per gross ~ere; Rsncho Bell· Vis~a/IVlounuin View was approved c a density of 3.0 units per gross acre; Additionally, enclosed foryour revxew is the transcript of the City Council hearing of August 17, 1993 we have prepared, where the Nicolas Valley area, including RoripanZh Ranch was discussed. The Xranscript clearly shows thai it was the understanding and intent ol'all concerned, including City Council, ths~ xhree un~ per gross acre is thai which was being considered and ·ppreved for RoripauEl~ As I am sure you f~l, we do not want to stand before the Planning Commission and City Council with a queslion as to whether we are consistent witfi the General Plan in V of the allowable densiW. This is the most basic o£ issues zhat ~ m~z ~e revived ~ We also £eel quite con~onable; 2ive~ the issues outlined herein, thsz a findin2 oF ~,~asistatc~/with the Lxud Use l~-lemenl'c~the General Plan would noz rneex any quesuon oF fesimmsce. Our desire is to resolve this issue and concenrraze on the design derails proposed in the Specific Plan. The final densi~ and number o~dwetling. units on Roripaugh Ranch will then be determined as they should be, based on the merits end features of the physical desi2n of the project and the relationship with the physical surroundinKs. Thank you for your time ahd considerszion offhis matter. We look ~orward to resclvin2 this ~ssue in a manner th-~.permi~s us to rum our aztention m the merits of the project itserie. Please give me or Ric. Stepb,~_~ a call should you have any questions or would like to discuss this issue ~urther. Sincerely, Tom ~. Nievez Senior Planner Norm I~er, GKC Development Tom Cla~k, GRC Development Bob Lind~uer, The Keith Companies Ric Stephens, The Keith Companies Rick Kobozts, The Keith Companies Tom B, imey. The X~eith Companies THE KEITH COMPANIES Transcript of the Temecula City Council Hearing of August 17, 1993 Ho~an: Mayor. Mayor: S. Edwzrd: Mayor. G. Thornfrill: l~luest to reopen the public hearing to consider Area 5, Nicolas Valley, and receive public testimony Public hearing is reopened on Nicohs Valley, Area 5. We do have three requuu to sp~k. My narr~ is Sanford Edward, 110 Newport C~t~r Drive, ~endng Ko~pugh ~n~ Inc. Mayor, councilpmons, ~ ag usnt~y n~ng ~at ha~ a ~t~c cl~up. Kod~ugh ~ ~ ~1 no. 8, the ~ge p~cd on ~c sc~. ~c ha~ ~wo ~u~u. One ~o1~ ~ound ~e ~t~e 8~ a~u. ~c o~ ~o~a ~ound just the pnehan~e, whi~ is 160 acre. It should be noted that the panhandle area is in the City a~d the other part is not inside the City, but within the Sphere Correct. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that the land use ha designated at 3 units per ac~e overall. That was staffs recommendation. But the Planning Commission basically deferred and said they preferred to have the landovnaer come in with a Specific Plan. We are in agreement with that. But then, subsequent to the Pknning Commission, at looking at the maps and anticipated land uses, we are going to be precluded from the opportunity of coming before you at ahter date with a Spd~c Plan and F.21~ that would mitigate any issues that would essentially ajlow us tO develop at 3 units ro the acre. So, in order to be able w do that, and not have w ask for a General Phn Amendment, we're requesting that one land use category be adde~ to the anticipated land use~ and that's the Low Medium Ind use..a/ld that a couple of the areas which have a 0 - 5 degree slope be changed to a LM, Low Medium hnd use. All due will effectively do is ~llow us, when ~e do come back with a Spedtic Plan, to try to get that overall 3 units per aae, which staff did recommend, and to be able to do so without having to g~ through a General Plan Amendment. Does staff agree with the conclusion of the speaker with respect to the impact of that r~lueR? Do you want that r~-peated? I heard most of i~ It's hard to relate it to the kind of area that his talking about. That's the only problem I have. How much of the property os i~ the 0 - 5% slope ar~? On the lsr~ ~40 acre p~'eI, I'd sa7 appwxir~tely 40 to 50%. I{ wc ~ to ~op, quote/unquox~ at t~e ~mum aloehie aesi~atlons, a~or~ns w ~e ~p ~ it ~u ~ght n~, ~ ~uld ~d up ~th appro~tcly I 0C0 uniu on gO0 s~, whi~ would be far sho~ of ~-~ s~s re,intonation of 3 unlu p~ s~ Wc ~i~y ~ 2 ~d use mego~ on ~e np ~ k ~ now. ~t's ~side Residen~ and Low Kuid~t~ G. Thornhill; Thi~ is the first time that I am aware of this one. Did you write john (Meyer) a letter? 5. Bdwxrd: Yes. I chink zha:'s where we arc suffering from Joh n's absence. We wrote him on both June II and july 14. G. Thorn.h~: I remember the other properflu, bu~ not ~ one. Mayor. Does srxff need more time to ,i: dovn with the applicant? G. Thornhill: I think we need w ,,~or~ back to the Council on u~is. Unfortunar. ely, Mr. Meyer had a conversation that...infornmtion....(inauda'blc) Mayor: Do :you have a problem with S. Edward: No. I don't have a problem with that. Mayor. Does Council have a problem with that? P. Birdsall: No. 8, then, we are going w rake out of this bunch. Is that correct? Mayor: Right. G. Thornhal: I think, conceptually, I don't h:ve too mueh of a problem wkh this because of the slopes involved. Usually, you c~ d~relop at those densities on those slopes, but.. (inaud,'ble) This wilt come back as a Specific Plan? G. raornhilh Absolutely. You wait somc flcx:'bility in the Specific Pkn to allow some little bit higher densities in eeruln areas so you can pay for all the improvements you arc going to have to put in. S. Edward: En~ly. Wc don't anticipate going beyond the 3 units per acre, but, as you're suggesting, there may be some areas where devclopmcn~ will t~kc ph~ at a 2 Mayor. S. Edward: Larry Lynch: Mayor:. L L,~mch: Mayor:. R. Stephens: Mayor: D. HoW: m~ lower t~veI. But if w~ ~ion't have the flexibility in fie m ~ha: have ~lope to g~ fie d~si~ h~ ~ecfivety the p~p~ ~n'~ be ~op~le. There's on 1,t issue, whia is the second one, HI jus= mention it in passing, and that relates to the panhandle. That fight now has a current Assessment District tax, which is locked in at a basic rite. And we w-ant to get the underlying maps to conf~rm to tha~ basedstunt Disuict rare. That is some,h;-g ~e had discussed with surf and they told us it w~ an overall policy, but ~ ~ one particular instance where they didn't re~lite it was existing · nd we weren't able to pick k up. OK. AFtin, I think perhaps that's an issue that be further developed with surf and then where 'it coma back, wc m a~dr~s the ~ Thank you. Thank you very much. Lany Lynch ~dr~sing No. 61. Representing DL F. qukies, owner of Panelto Bala Vista. I want to confirm that the Spedfie Plan, as adopted by the County, is to be 'adopted, as is' u pan of this General Plan. Staff is nodding .affirmatively. (Not atOllcable) Richard Stephens, addressing Kofipaugh Ranch. Richard 5tophens, The Kekh Comtnnie~, re~resenting Gentry Homes. We are in aKrecment with Mr. Ed~vard's request. I'd like to also remind you that the she has numerous cnviwnmenul constraints and giving that little higher density allows for much more flmq;ility in had plaVning or erarlve solutions to problems. We did have one question, and t~at was the significance of the exhibit with fie red coloring. It looks like, perhaps staff can chrff7 finis, that there was a request made on the site for a Spezi~c Plan designsdon that was defied. Am I misinterpreting the significance of this exhibit? Mn Hogan? Yes. That's not a denial of a Specific Plan. That map only depieu the different land use requests we have received and whether or not there vas a .recommendation to support it or oppose it. So, when a property owner comes m. he would be able to identify the property and identify what stafPs ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STAFF L~-'t""t ERS DATED JULY 18 AND AUGUST 15, 1994 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 STAFF Lb m m ERS DATED JULY 18 AND AUGUST 15, 1994 ]uty 18, 199~ Tom Nieves The Keith Cotupanies 22690 Cactus Avenue, Suite 300 Moreno Valley, CA 92553 SUBJECT: Maximum Density. for the Roripaueda Ranch Specific Plan Dear Mr. Nieves: This letter is in response to your r~a. ues~ of the planning Depanment's determmarlon of the overa/density. for the Roripaugh Ranch 5pecLflc Plan. The T~nd Use E!etuent of the Ciry's adopted General Plan states that the Roripaugh Ranch Spectfic Plan project "...shall not exceed an average of tkrv~ dwelling unim per acre..." The Land Use Element further states: "The tuax/mum densiw. deftues the maximum nutuber of ururs per net acre at which development can occur Within a ~ven area. Net ac~ is defined as the gross project or lot area, less that pomon of the site to be used for the following: aneml, major, secondary. and collector roads: z. nd the floodway pomon of a flood plain." Second. please be aware that net acreage is not the sole de~erm~n.nt of the overall density.. Section I'V(A)(1} of me T ~nd Use Eletuent also lists the other factors that axe used in determining net density.. These factors include: opportunities and con~uaints of the site (e.g. topo=q-aphy, bydxology, sensitive habitats, etc.), policies and impletuentation pro__~-ams of the General P)an, and other City building and developtuent standards. Third. you have had discussions with stuff m_Tarding the defm/tioru of Average Density and Target Density., as the terms apply to this project. However, bemuse the site has multiple hnd use desi~ations. and bemuse the Genera PXan specifically stutes the project's avem_~e densiT, the taxget density. pmvUions do not apply m thi~ project. Therefore, it h your msp. onsibiiiry. to provide surf with a calcuiaUon of the nc~ acreage of the site in orelet to ciemrmme the preliminary maxKnum unit count. lvtr. Tom Nieves ]uiy 18, 1994 Page Two In nclclld. onm the density issue, thez= a~ other issues that still n~-_,d to be resolved prior to the submir,~l of an applicaion for th~s projet:. It is the Pl-~nn~ng Deparonent's position mat them has not been an adequate discussion of the opponuinUes and consrrdmu of me siL- a~ outlined in a letmr to you dated May 2~, 1994. While the oppornmities and coats have been discussed in general terms, staff has yet be presented with any information other th~n file pr~llmln~ry lalld u~e plall. Specifically, staff would like to see derailed inforr-.Hon as it relates t~ biological resources, arcbaeolo=~y, paleontology, topo.-n-d.phy, hydrology, in~cax~, and surrounding land use pat-~rns. In addkion, staff would like to r~view a conceptus/site plan of the commercial ar-.as winch show how these a.r~ will conform to the Vu1._-e Center concept shown in the General Plan. Upon r~viewing the mos~ recent illustrative site plan depicting two srn~I1 commercial sites, sr.a_~* is concernexi about the these a_~ conforming to the Gener-al Phu. In closing, I would like to take this opporminry to invite you and your representatives m disc}zs~ be oppormintles and constrainr~ of the site. If you wish to set up said m~fing, or you have any queaions about th~ letmr, please contact Craig Ruiz at (909) 69~6400. cc: Thomas Clark, Royal-Clark Developmenz "'LL', Z City of Temecula \:'~~~slnes~ Par~ Dr,ve · Temecula, California ~2S,70 August 15, 1994 Tom Nieves The Kel~ Compm~i=s 22690 Cactus Avenue, SuiR: 300 Moreno Valley, CA 92~53 SUBJECT: Gemeral Plan Consistency for the Roripaugh 1L%neh Specific Plan Dear lvir. Nieves: Ci~' stuff h~ pe~ormed a cursory, review of your submittal for the above referenced project. Afmr reviewing the proposed density, for the project, it is staffs opinion mat the project is inconsistent with the Ciry.'s General Plan. Previously, staff indicated to you, both vefozlly and in wrkmn corfem. ondence, that the Generzl Plan states this project sh~ll not exc~eed a maximum of t/lree unim per "net" ace. Sm. ff furmet stated that net acr~ge is defined a~ the goss project rea. less that portton of the site to be used for General Plan CircuL%tion roadways and the floodway portion of a flood plain. However, no chin ha~ been provided on the m'nount of net acreage. The proposed 2.370 unim is based upon "gross" aceage, which inconsistent wi~ the General Plan. In order for stuff to continue processmE this applicanon, you will n~_~i to do one of the following: 1. Reduce the number of unim proposed in the mpeci~c plm~ based upon a czlculmion of ~e net acr~ge of ~e si= ~d zub~t ~e re~s~ pl~. 2. File a General P~n Amendment to reflect the increase in density proposed in the specific plan, Please note, based upon stuffs inids/review of the plan and prior cornmenu provided to you, sm.ff will most likely be unable to support a General Plan Amendment for an increase m density. It should be noted that City stz~ff has not yet reviewed this project. If stuff cominucs processing the prqiect, further cornmenu will be provided. If you should have any que~x/ons about the above informzUon, please contact Craig Ruiz a:-- "' (909) 69~.-6400. Sinc=~ly, Gin-3, Thornhill] Dire:tot of planning cc: Thomas Clark, RoTal-Clark D~vclopmcnt Co. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXCERPTS FROM CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN R:~GENPLAN~RORJPAGH.CC3 11/7/94 sdl 7 CITY OF ~CUI-~· Land Use Ziem:n: 1. Residen~al Desi~Uons Each of the residential use ca~_zorics includes a ran~ of allowable clefriffles. The maximum d~usip/ckc:Sncs fine maxUnum number of units ~r net a:r: a~ winir, h dcvctopmcm can occur within a ~ivcn area. Net a.cr: is de~n~ as fine lFoss projoe.: or lm area, less finat portion of fine si,,' m be us~ for fine following: arterial major, sc,.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~ondary and colle-'-mr roans; and the floodway ponton of plain. Der:rmination of prc,'ise dcnsizy, cievelopmcnt locaUon. and lot on any ruiaen~ial property is a function Opportunities and constaints prcsenxcd by natural, cultural or features; Policies and implemcnution prop,~-~ of the General Plan rotended to maxirnizc public safer'; achieve hi_c,Tu qualin/si-' p~,,ni,~g and dcsiLJn: provide sul~cient levels of public scrvio=; re:sin si!nLfi:am nam~ai resources; ensure compatibilipy berw~n usa; and cncoun~ development of Villag~ Centera. Building and ci~v~lopmcnt smndarcis conmin~ in fine Developmorn Code, pubic works sunckarcis, and other rc~uiaxions and orciinanc=s. Fumr~ r-,.sidential development is exp. c:md m oc,."u.r at the target level of d~nsity statc,d fin Table 2-7 for each r~sidemial dcsi!pution. Dcvclopmem at a density be~veeu the target and maximum level may only ocr, ur for the Hillside, Very Low, Low and Low Medium dcsi_uatious, at the dis~rctiou of the Plat~ning Commission/City Council m exchange for sp~ial public benefits (~ icicutfficd in Policy, '{.1). The amcnitics or public bencries provided are intended to satisfy a need over and above the minimum x~cluircmenz.s of fine C~neral Plan and other city policies and regulations. I~ is assumr, d fina~ some ruidcmial d~velopmem will oct. u: below the Lsr~: level of density and some dcvclopmen: will occur above ~he ~arge: level based on the provision of public amenitics or bcncfiLs. For purposes of analyzing the impacn of fine G~n:ral Plan, the ~ar~ct level of denaiD, for fine above identified designations is assumed. A xarget l~vcl of dcusiD, is not c~2blishcd for the M~ium and High designations so as not to prcrlucie or discourage the developmere of nffnrdablc housing. However, for purp. oscs of anatyzin. g fine impaces of the General Plan, a probable level of devciopmcm within fine Mr, allure and High cicsi~nations is assumed. ~-"i~-OX~:~P-Lh~.L~i~ - Da~c: Novrmocr 9. 1993 ITEM 35 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPR~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning November 15, 1994 Main Street Program Prepared By: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council provide direction to Staff on: 1. The needed amendments to the existing Bylaws; 2. The future organization of Main Street Association; 3. The use of alternate funding sources for the Main Street Program; and 4. The draft Cooperative Agreement between for '~he Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association and the City of Temecula. BACKGROUND At the July 12, 1994 meeting, the Council first considered the organization of the future main street association for the Old Town area. At that meeting, the Council expressed a number of concerns with using the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association to operate the Main Street Program in Old Town. The Council's primary concerns were as follows: · Ensuring that membership in the Association is open to ever%- ~ne; · Ensuring that the composition of the future Board of Directors is as broad as possible; · Amending the Bylaws; and, · Transitioning between the current and future Boards of Directors. As a result, the Council directed staff to have the City Attorney review the Bylaws of the current merchants association, to bring a recommendation back to the Council about how to change the Bylaws, to get copies of position descriptions and compensation packages for other executive directors, and to develop an agreement to fund the main street program once the details of the transition have been worked out. In this Report, staff has attempted to differentiate between the current mainstreet/merchants association and the future Main Street Program association. The current merchants association changed its name in March 1994to the Old Town Mainstreet Association. In this Agenda Report, the current organization will be referred to as the "Mainstreet (Merchants) Association." The future organization that will operate the main street program will be referred to as the "Main Street Association". DISCUSSION Ensurina the Membership is Open to Everyone As directed by the Counci!, staff forwarded a copy of the Old Town Merchants (Mainstreet) Association's revised Bylaws to the City Attorney for his review. According to the City Attorney, membership is open to anyone with an interest in Old Town and who is at least 18 years old. If the Council is concerned about the involvement of the community in the future Main Street Program, staff recommends that the Association be required to undertake a public information/education campaign to inform the community about Old Town, the Program, and their opportunities for involvement. A copy of the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association existing Bylaws and the City Attorney's letter are included in Attachments 2 and 3, respectively. Composition of the Board of Directors The Council also expressed concern about the long term composition of the Board of Directors. The current Bylaws provide for a seven-member Board of Directors, elected for two (2) year terms. The Bylaws provide for the election of half of the Board seats (either 3 of 7 or 4 of 7) each year and that a person must be a member of the Association at least one year before to assuming the office of Director. Staff believes that these provisions allow adequate opportunity for community involvement in the Association and on the Board of Directors. If the Council is concerned with the ability of the general public to become quickly involvetJ in the Main Street Association, staff recommends that the Council request that the Mainstreet (Merchant) Association amend their Bylaws to replace the one year requirement (in Section 3.02) with a shorter requirement. Alternatives include a requirement that all Directors of the Association must be a member for at least three months before assuming office, or must be a member of the Association prior to the date of their nomination or election. In addition, the Council was also concerned that a husband and wife team were both serving on the existing Board of Directors. The way the current Bylaws are structured, if the husband and wife have separate memberships, each would be allowed to vote and hold an elected office. If the Council is concerned with this situation, then staff recommends that the Council request the Association to amend their Bylaws to restrict the ability of married couples to simultaneously serve on the Board of Directors. Bylaw Amendments The only significant concern the City Attorney had with the existing Bylaws was the lack of an open meeting provision in Section 3.11. Based upon the City Attorneys review, staff recommends the Council request the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association to make the following amendments to their Bylaws as a precondition for receiving City funding for the Main Street Program: Amend Section 3.02 to change the requirements for being a member of the Board of Directors from one year to 90 days (or some other period acceptable to the Council). Amend Section 3.11 to require that all meetings of the Board of Directors shall be open to the public, except that confidential matters may be discussed by the Board of Directors in closed session, and that meeting agendas be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting in one or more places in Old Town and at City Hall. Amend Sections 6.01 and 6.02 to require that all general membership and special meetings be open to the public and that meeting agendas be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting in one or more places in Old Town and at City Hall (to meet the requirements of the Brown Act). The Transition to the Future Main Street Association The transition from the current to the future Associations can be addressed by the City taking the following steps: Amending the current Bylaws to ensure maximum community involvement as described above; Entering into a Cooperative Agreement with the MainStreet (Merchants) Association to state the responsibilities of each party, and to set up the working relationship between the Association and the City; and, · Retaining the current provisions for annual elections to the Board of Directors. Coooeratjve Aareement Based upon the Council's previous concerns, and the input of the City Attorney, staff has developed a draft Cooperative Agreement to forrealize the working and funding relationship between the City of Temecula and the Association. The draft Agreement would commit the City to spending $235,000on the Main Street Program over the next five years (as described in the Old Town Specific Plan) and would commit the Association t ~ amending their Bylaws and implementing the Main Street Program. A copy of the draft Cooperative Agreement is included in Attachment 1. If the draft Cooperative Agreement is generally acceptable to the Council, staff will begin the negotiation process with the Old Town Mainstreet Association. The final Cooperative Agreement will be brought back to the Council at a later date. R:\HOOANDXMAINST.CC2 11/'7/~4 dwh 3 Alternate Fundine Sources At the July 12, 1994 meeting, the issue of alternate funding sources for the Old Town Main Street Association was discussed. It is currently anticipated that the main street program will be funded by the Redevelopmerit Agency. However, over the long term, other funding sources should be considered. At this time, there appear to be two options to provide a relatively stable funding source for the Program. The two options are as follows: Establishment of a specific Community Service Level (through the Community Services District) to maintain public plaza, landscaping and parking areas, and to provide financial support to the Main Street Association. Creation of a Business Improvement District to financially support the Main Street Association. The District could also be used to support public parking and landscaping in the core of Old Town. A recent amendment to State law now allows Property and Business Improvement Districts to support promotional, marketing, and economic development activities. If the Council is interested in exploring further, or in establishing, one of these alternate funding sources, Staff requests that they provide the appropriate direction. Prooram Director Recruitment Staff obtained a number of job descriptions from other main street programs. Using this information as a base, Human Resources prepared a draft position description and job brochure. This information was reviewed and approved by the Board of the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association. The recruitment process has started and applications must have been received before November 14, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT According to the draft Cooperative Agreement, the City will be committing to support the new Main Street Association over 5 years for a total of $235,000. No additional appropriation is required at this time, however an additional appropriation of ~75,000may be required to fund the first year of the cooperative agreement if Council chooses to adopt it. It is anticipated that long range funding for the Main Street Program and Association will rely on a combination of membership dues, promotional and fund raising activities, and corporate and municipal sponsors. Attachments: 1. Draft Cooperative Agreement between the City and the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association - Page 5. 2. Current Bylaws for the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association - Page 10. 3. Letter from the City Attorney on Current Bylaws - Page 11. R:~HOGAND\MAII~ST.CC2 l]18194 dwb 4 ATTACHMENT 1 DRAFT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF TEMECULA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made in triplicate, this day of ,1994, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, ("City") duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, and the OLD TOWN TEMECULA MAINSTREET ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Association" .) In consideration of their mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1, Recitals. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement is entered into with respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged by each pa.-ty as true and correct. A. The City of Temecula and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency desires to promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula; and, B, The City of Temecula prepared and adopted a Specific Plan to create a dynamic Old Town commercial and residential core that is attractive and of high quality. respectful of its historic buildings and unifying design theme and providing an economically viable setting for a mixture of local and tourist serving commercial uses, administrative/ professional and residential uses with a safe, efficient circulation and access; and, C. The Old Town Specific Plan recommended the establishment of a Main Street Program to organize and unify the efforts of the Old Town's business community; and, D. The Old Town Mainstreet Association is an established community organization with an interest in improving and redeveloping Old Town Temecula; and, E, The City and Association desire to implement a Main Street Program in Old Town Temecula to encourage the revitalization of the area. 2. Duties and Responsibilities of the City. The following are the duties and responsibilities of the City during the life of this Agreement: A. To review the Bylaws of the Association and make recommended changes to ensure maximum feasible community partici pation and organizational effectiveness, B. To provide partial funding for the Main Street Program for at least five years. The Old Town Specific Plan identified the following funding for each fiscal year: iv. v. vi. by the City Council. Fiscal Year 1994-95 $75,000 Fiscal Year 1995-96 960,000 Fiscal Year 1996-97 940,000 Fiscal Year 1997-98 930,000 Fiscal Year 1998-99 930,000 Subsequent funding in future years will be determined annually C. To consider the establishment of alternative funding sources for the Main Street Program if sufficient support of and opportunity for such a measure is present. D. To assist the Association in the obtaining permits for major promotional and fundraising activities in the Old Town area. 3. Duties and Responsibilities of the Association. The following are the duties and responsibilities of the Association during the life of this Agreement: A. To amend the Bylaws of the Association as recommended by the City Council to ensure maximum feasible community participation and organizational effectiveness. B. To make no changes to the Bylaws or Articles of Incorporation that could affect the participation of interested persons in the Association or that could adversely affect the continued economic redevelopment of Old Town without the prior approval of the City Council. C. To hire an Executive Director to implement the Main Street Program, build up the membership and public support for the Association, and to market and support the businesses in Old Town. D. To continuously explore, and attempt to acquire, alternate funding sources to permanently support operation of the Main Street Program. E. To provide a detailed Annual Report for each fiscal year on how the Cit~ funding support for the Main Street Program was spent by May 1st of each year. Street Program. To promote and expand community interest and involvement in the Main 4. Indemnification. The Association agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the city and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of Association's acts or omissions of those of Association's employees, officers, agents or invites in connection with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law. 5. Insurance, The Association shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers' compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with the Association and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall: A. Include the City, its elected officials, officers, ~gents and employees as the insureds or names as additional insured covering the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connections with, this Agreement, B. Provide the following minimum limits: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Automobile Liability: accident for bodily injury and property damage. $1,000,000 combined single limit per (3) Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. C. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the city, its officers, officials, agents and employees for losses arising from work performed by the Association for the City. D. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the city shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less that thirty (30) days before date of expiration or cancellation is effective E. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects to the City, its officers, officials, agents and employees; or the Association shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation claim administration and defense expenses. 6. Attornev's Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. 7. Termination. Either party may terminate this agreement on December 31 th and June 30th of each year with 60-days advance notice, in writing, of their intent to do so. 8. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended in w~ iting at any time with the approval of both parties. CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN MAINSTREET ASSOCIATION Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Frank Spencer, President June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney ATI'ACHMENT 2 EXISTING BYLAWS FOR THE OLD TOWN MAINSTREET (MERCHANTS) ASSOCIATION BYLAWS OF ~ OLD TOWN TE1VIECULA MAINSTI!F-F.T ASSOCIATION AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION ARTICL~ I. OFFICES Principal Office Section 1.01. The principal office of the Association for the transaction of its business is located at P.O. Box 1981, Temecuia, in County of Riverside, California, 92593. Other Offices Section 1.02. The Board of Directors may by resolution designate other offices, within or without the State of California where it is qualified to do business, as its business may require. However, the Board shall incur no financial liability on behalf of the Association in obtaimg other offices without the prior approval of a majority of the voting members of the Association. ARTICLE II. MEMBEILq~rP Classes of Membership and Rights Section 2.01. The Association shall have one (I) class of membership. The membership, voting, and other rights, interests and privileges of each member shall be equal. Each membership shall be allowed only one (1) vote in each election. Qualifications for Members Section 2.02. (a) The qualifications for membership are as follows: any reputable person (at least eighteen (18) years of age), business, association, corporation, parmersinp or estate, interested in the continued economic health and cultural vitality of Old Town, shall be eligible for membership. Admission Section 2.03. (a) Any qualified person shall be admired to membership upon making application thereto and upon the approval of the application by a majority of the Board of Directors or their designee. The application shall be on such forms and in the manner prescribed by the Board of Directors. (b) All applications for admission to the Association shall contain an aclmowledgement that the applicant has read the Articles, Bylaws and other appmpmte roles and standards of the Association and that ff admitted to membership, agrees to be bound thereby. (c) Upon admission to the Association, e~ch new member shall be given one (1) copy of the ByLaws. Each member is responsible for keeping and maintaining their copy of the Association Bylaws. Fees, Dues and Assessments Section 2.04. (a) All members shall pay annual dues in such amount as shall be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors. (b) The first annual dues shall be payable when the application for membership in the Association is made. Members of the Old Town Temecula Memhants Association become members of the Old Town Temecula Malnstreet Association until the renewal date for the Association membership when they will join the Mainsweet Association. All annual dues shall be promted on a quarterly basis to make all memberships expire on January 1, 1996. No sepaxate application fee shall be charged for making application to membership in the Association. (c) Future annual dues shall be due and payable on January 1st of each of each succeeding year. (d) Any dues and assessments paid to the Association become the property of the Association and any sereruble or individual interest of any member therein terminates on such payment. Transferability of Membership Section 2.05. Membership in this Association is nontransferable and nonassignable. Membership Roster Section 2.06. The Association shall keep a membership roster containing the name and address of each member. The termination of membership of any member shall be recorded in the roster, together with the manner of termination and date on which such membership ceased. The membership roster shall be kept at the Association's principal office and shall be available for inspection by any member of the Association during regular business hours. Right to Inspect Records Section 2.07. All records of this Association shall be open to inspection on the written demand of any member at any reasonable time for a purpose reasonably related to his interests in the Association. Termination of Membership Section 2.08. (a) The membership of any member of the Association shall automatically terminate for any of the following reasons: (i) On his written request for such termination delivered to the President or Secretary of the Association personally or by United States mail, such membership to tanninate when the request is received; or, (ii) When any member who fails to pay the membership dues or assessments when they become due and within forty five (45) days thereafter shall automatically terminated on the forty sixth (46) day, provided he was given written notice delivered to him personally or by United States mail within ten (10) days prior to the date said dues or assessments were due. In the event that such written notice is not given as herein requirexl, then said membership shall automatically terminate for nonpayment of dues or assessments only ff they are not fully paid within thirty (30) days after such written notice is eventually given and delivered to the member in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid and sent to the address as it appears on the books of the Association. (b) All rights and interest of membership in the Association shall cease upon the termination of or expulsion from membership in the Association as herein provided. (c) Any member whose membership is terminated as provided for in this Section, may be readmilled to membership by meeting the applicable membership requirements for new members. Discipline of Members Section 2.09. (a) Whenever a member of the Association fails to abide with the Articles, Bylaws or Rules of the Association, the Board of Directors may discipline the member for their actions, behavior, or other good cause. Good cause shall mean the following: (i) Any conduct or behavior that brings the Association into public disrepute or violates the purposes for which this Association is formed; (ii) Any willful failure or refusal to abide by the Articles, Byhws, or Rules of this Association; Cfii) Any willful failure or refusal to abide by the terms of an award in any arbitration proceeding under the terms of this Article after having agreed in writing to do so and after having received notice of the award; or, (iv) Any willful failure or refusal to pay any assessment levied pursuant to the provisions of this Article. (b) The Board of Directors is hereby authorized, as herein provided to impose any of the following penalties: (i) Suspend the member from membemhip in the Association for a period not more than one (1) year; or, (vi) The hearing against any member shall be informal and the rules of evidence and roles of judicial procedure need not be observed. The hearing shall be presided over by the President of the Association who shall (1) read the chaxges against the subject member; (2) require that the charges be verified by the testimony of the person or persons making them; (3) hear any other wimesses against the subject matter; (4) allow the subject member to cross-examine each wimess; (5) allow the subject member to make a statement of his own behalf; (6) allow the member to call wimesses in his own behalf; (7) allow the Directors present, when and as recognized by the chair, and subject to control of the chair, to question wimesses; and (8) rule on the admission and exclusion of evidence and on questions of hearing procedure. (vii) After hearing all relevant testimony and evidence, the Directon who are present at the hearing shall vote on whether or not sufficient evidence has been presented to determine whether the subject member has failed to act in a manner consistent with the goals and ethics of the Association. The vote imposing discipline or dismissing the matter shall in either event be final. (viii) If the Board of Directors has determined that the subject member has viohted the goals and ethics of the Association, the Directors shall determine what manner of disciplina~ action shall be taken against the subject member. The Board may discipline or punish the subject member in any manner it deems appropriate, consistent with the provisions of tlds Section. ARTICLE llI. DIRECTORS Number of Direaors Section 3.01. There shall be seven (7) Directors for the Association. These Bylaws may be amended to allow additional members on the Board of Directors. Any amendment of these Bylaws to allow additional members to the Board of Directors shall require a two-thirds (2/3's) vote of the Board. Qualifications of Directors Section 3.02. A DLrector of the Association must currently be, and have been, a member of the Association for at least one year prior to assuming the offme of Director. Terms of Office for Directors Section 3.03. The Term of Office for any Director of the Association is two (2) years, except that the Term of Office for some Initial Directors may be for a one year period. Any Director elecmd by the membership shall be eligible for reelection up to two (2) consecutive two year terms, provided they continue to meet the qualifications for office. Initial Board of Directors Section 3.04. The Initial Board of Directors for the Association shall consist of the six (6) members of the Old Town Merchants Association Board of Directors. Ttn'ee (3) of these Directors shall have two year terms of office ending in April 1996, and three (3) shall have a one year term of office ending in April 1995. The one and two year terms of office shall be determined by drawing lots. Additional Interim Director Section 3.05. The Initlal Board of Directors may appoint one additional Director to serve a one year term of office, ending in April 1995. Any directors appointed under this section must be elected by a 2/3rds vote of the entire Board of Directors. The additional Director shall have the same privileges and responsibilities as any duly elected Director of the Association. Election of Directors Section 3.06. The election of the Board of Directors shall be done in the following manner; (a) During the month of January preceding any election, the Secretary shall send a notice to all members stating that nominations for the elected Board of Directors may be submitted to the Secretary of the Association during the month of February and the President shall appoint a th_ree (3) member Nominating Committee to select qualified candidates for the Board of Directors. Nominations Shall be open for a period of at least thirty (30) days. (b) A ballot containing the list of candidates, and providing an opportunity for write in candidates, shall be distributed by certified mail or other verifmble means not less than fourteen (14) days before to the date of the scheduled election. (c) Any member may vote by absemee ballot provided that the ballot is received by the Association no later than 5:00 p.m. the day before the scheduled election. Voting by proxy or cumulative voting (casting multiple votes for a single candidate) is not allowed. (d) All elected Directors, other than those named in the Articles of Association, shall be elected by the members present and voting at the first Regular Meeting held in April of each year, provided that a quorum is present. If no quorum is present, the shall be held at the next Regular or Special Meeting at which a quorum is present. The candidates receiving the highest number of votes are elected. (e) If during the process of annually electing the members to the Board of Directors there is a tie for the last director position, there shall be an immediate runoff election to determine who shall serve on the Board. In the runoff election, any member of the Association in attendance at the meeting may vote by secret ballot. Duties of Directors Section 3.07. The duties of the Directors of the Association axe as follows: (a) To perform any and all duties imposed on them collectively or individually by law, by the Charter or Bylaws of this Association. (b) To employ such officers, agents, and employees as may be authorized by the vote or written consent of a majority of the members of the Association. (c) To supervise all officers, agents, and employees of this Association to ensure that their duties am being properly performed. (d) To register their address with the Secretary of the Association, and to receive notices of meetings mailed or telegraphed W them at the address on ffie with the Association. (e) To change the principal office of the Association from one location to another. Compensation of Directors Section 3.08. Disctots. shall serve without compensation. Removal of Directors Section 3.09. Any Director, may be removed from office at any time by the vote of a majority of the Membership of the Association. ff any or all Directors are so removed, new Directors may be elected at the same meeting and Shall hold office for the remainder of the terms of the removed Director. If new Directors are not elected at such meeting, the vacancy or vacancies created Shall be fried as provided in Section 3.10. Vacancies Section 3.10. (a) Vacancies to the Board of Directors, Shall exist: (1) on the death, resignation, or removal of any Director; (2) whenever the number of Directors authorized by the Bylaws is increased; and (3) on failure of the members voting in any election to elect the full number of Directors authorized. Co) The Board of Directors may declaxe vacant the office of a Director for any of the following reasons: (1) the subject Director has been declared of unsound mind by an order of court, (2) the subject Director is convicted of a misdemeanor relating to the duties or activities of the Association, (3) the subject Director is convicted of a felony, or (4) ff within sixty (60) clays the notice of election the subject Director does not accept the office either in writing or by attending a meeting of the Board of Directors. (c) Vacancies caused by the death, resignation, or disability of any Director, or removal as provided in these Bylaws, or by an amendment of the Bylaws increasing the number of Directors authorized shall be filled by a vote of the majority of the remaining Directors, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remairdng Director. A vote of the majority of the members of the Association may elect a Director at any time to fill any vacancy not ~lec[ by the Directors as pwvided in Paragraph (c) of this Section. Should the offices of all Directors become vacant and them is consequently no Director left to fill vacancies, the vacancies shall be filled by a vote of the majority of the members present at a regula~ or special meeting of members called for that purpose. (d) Persons elecmd to fill vacancies as in this section pwvided shall hold office for the unexpired terms of their predecessors, or until their removal or written resignation as provided in these Byhws. Meetings of the Board of Direaors Section 3.11. (a) Meetings shall be held at the principal office of the Association unless otherwise provided by the Board. (13) The Board of Directors shall meet at least once a month at such time and phce as may be designated by resolution of the Board of Directors. (c) Special meetings of the Board may be called by the President, or, if he is absent, is unable, or refuses to act, by the First Vice President, or, if he is absent, is unable, or refuses to act, by the Second Vice President, or by any four (4) Directors, and such meetings shall be held at the place designated by the person or persons c~lling the meeting and, in the absence of such designation, at the principal office of the Association. · --' (d) Written notice of the time and place of meetings shall be 'delivered~ personally to each Director or sent to him by United State mail, postage prepaid, or by' telephone, at least four (4) days prior to such meeting.' If sent by mail, the notice shall be addressed to the Director at his address as shown on the books of the Association and shall be deemed given at the time it is deposited in the mail. (e) The transactions of any meetings of the Board, however called and noticed, am as valid as though the meeting had been duly held after proper call and notice, and provided that a quorum as bereinafter defined, is present or provided that either before or after ' the meeting each Director not present signs a waiver of notice, and consents to the holding of the meeting. All such waivers, consents, or approvals shall be fried with the Associations's records or made a pan of the minutes of the meeting. (f) At least half of the all directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of Association business. (g) In the absence of a quorum, no business shall be transacted, and the only motion which the chair shall entertain is a motion to adjourn, provided, however, that a majority of the Directors present at such meeting may adjourn untU the time fLxed for the next regular meeting of the Board. (h) Meetings of Directon shall be presided over by the President of the Association, or in his absence, by the First Vice President or, in his absence, by the Second Vice President or, in their absence, the Treasurer of the Association, or in his absence, any Dir~tor chosen by a majority of the Disctots present. (i) Meetings of Directors shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, as such rules may be revised, insofar as such rnles are not inconsistent or in conflict with these Bylaws, with the Articles of this Association, or with State law. (j) Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present is the act of the Board of Directors, and hence of the Association, unless the Articles or these Bylaws requite a greater number. ARTICLE IV. OFFICERS Number and Tifies Section 4.01. (a) The .Qffieers of the Association shall be a President, First Vice President, Second Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. (b) The Association may also have, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, a Sergeant at Arms, one or more Assistant Secretaries, one or more Assistant Treasurers, and such other supplemental officers as the Board of Directors may deem necessary. A Serg~tnt at Arms may be used to maintain order at any meeting. The duties and responsibilities of these supplemental officers shall be determined by the Board of Directors. Qualifications Section 4.02. Any member of the Board of Directors of this Association is qualified to be an Officer of the Association as defined in Section 4.0~. Election of Officers Section 4.03. (a) The President, the First Vice President, Second Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer shall be elected by the Directors from among their number at their fast meeting following their election, or, in the case of the Directors named in the Articles, at their fast meeting following formation of the Association. Such officers, including the original officers, shall be eligible for reelection without limitation on the number of terms, provided they continue to meet the qualifications for office. (b) All additional Officers listed in Section 4.01 shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and need not be members of the Board of DLr~ctors. Terms of Office Section 4.04. All Officers of the Association shall serve for a one (1) year period from the time they are elected until the next annual election. Duties of Officers Section 4.05. (a) President. The President shall preside over all meetings of the Association and the Board of Directors, and shall appoint the members of the Committees identified in Section 05.01 of these Bylaws. In addition, the President may appoint a Sergeant at Arms at any time during a meeting when it is necessary to maintain order. (b) First Vice President. The First Vice President shall preside over the meetings of the Association and the Board of Directors, and perform the other duties of President in the absence of the Presi~m. The First Vice President is also responsible for overseeing membership activities and functions. (c) Second Vice President. The Second Vice President shall preside over the meetings of the Association and the Board of Directors, and perform the other duties of President in the absence of the President and the First Vice President. The Second Vice President is also responsible for overseeing special and promotional events. (d) Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have charge of all receipts and monies of the Association, deposit them in the name of the Association in a bank approved by the Board, and disburse funds as ordered or authorized by the Board. The Treasurer shall keep accurate account and collect all application fees, dues, and charges due from members, and keep regular accounts of his receipts and disbursements, submit his record when requested, and give an itemized statement at regular meetings of the Association. In the absence of the President, First Vice President and Second Vice President, the Treasurer shall preside and assume the duties of the President. (e) Secretary. The Secretary shall keep the minutes of all meetings of the Association and the Board and read such minutes at the beginning of each meeting, ff requested m do so. The Seerelax3, shall also mail out the Notices of Meeting for the Association and Board. With the consent of the Board of Directors, the Secretary may delegate these additional responsibilities to an appropriate employee of the Association. In the absence of the President, First Vice Presidere, Second Vice President, and Treasurer, the Secretary shall assume the duties of the President. Compensation of Officers Section 4.06. Officers shall serve without compensation. Removal of Officers Section 4.07. Any or all officers may be removed from office at any time by the vote of a majority of the Directors of the Association. In the case of the removal of any officer, a new officer shall be elected to serve the unexpired portion of the term of his predecessor at the meeting at which the officer is removed. Vacancies Section 4.08. (a) Vacancies in the office of President, First Vice President, Second Vice President, Secretary, or Treasurer Shall exist on the death, resignation, or removal of such officer or on the failure of the directors in any election w fffi the office. (b) The Board of Directors may declare vacant any office for any of the following reasons: (I) if the officer is declared of unsound mind by an order of court, (2) the officer is convicted of a misdemeanor rehtlng to the duties or activities of the Association, (3) the officer is convicted of a felony, or (4) if within sixty (60) days after the notice of election the officer does not accept the office either in writing or by attending a meeting of the membership. (c) Vacancies shall be fried by the Board of Directors at the next regular meeting at which a quorum is present following the vacancy. (d) Officers elected to fill vacancies, as provided in this section, shall hold office for the unexpired terms of their predecessors, or until their removal or resignation as provided for in these Bylaws. Section 4.{Y). The President, First Vice President, Second Vice President, Secretary and the Treasurer, shall constitute an Executive Committee to assist the Board in conduction routine business of the Association. ARTICt.F.V. COMMITT~.~-q Section 5.01. The Board of Directors shall authorize and define the powers and duties of all Committees. All Committees Shall serve at the pleasure of the Board. No Committee shall adept their own bylaws or maintain their own funds in separate accounts. Section 5.02. The President, with the approval of the Board of Directors, shall appoint all Committee Chairpersons. Section 5.03. All Committee Chairpersons shall be members of the Association and shall agree in writing, to abide with all appropriate roles and regniations of the Association. The Chairperson shall appoint or select the members of their Committee and shall provide the Board of Directors with a complete list of the membership of the Committee. Section 5.04. No member of the Association shall be allowed to serve as a voting member of any Committee so long as their dues are delinquent. Non-members of the Association may assist and work on any Committee of the Association as non-voting members or advisors. Section 5.05. Persons appointed in charge of committees shall be recognized by the title of "Chairperson". ARTICLE VI./~F~'rLNGS OF MEMBERS Regular Meetings Section 6.01. (a) Regular and Special Meetings shall be held at the principal office of the Association or other place as may be designated by the Board of Directors. Co) The time of each Regular Meeting of the Association shall be at a time set by the Board of Directors. The mailing of individual Notices of Meeting is not required for regularly scheduled meetings. Except in the event of a declared emergency, the Board of Directors for the Association for that year, shall be elected at the regular meeting beld in April of each year beginning in 1995. (c) At any Regular Meeting, no action shall be taken on any of the following proposals unless a written notice of the meeting has been given w each member: (1) a proposal to sell, lease, convey, exchange, transfer, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the property or assets of the Association; (2) any proposal relating to the real property of the Association; (3) any proposal to incorporate; (4) any proposal to amend the Articles of this Association; or (5) any proposal to dissolve the Association. Special Meeting Section 6.02. (a) All Special meetings of members shall be called by the President, or any four (4) Directors of the Association, or by not less than seventy-five percent (75 %) of the Members of the Association. (b) When required by these Bylaws or the Board of Directors, written notice of the time and phce of meetings shall be delivered personally to each member, or sent to him by United States mail, postage prepaid, or by telephone, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting. If sent by mail, the notice shall be addressed to the member at the address as shown on the books of the Association and shall be deemed given at the time it is deposited in the mail. (c) The Notice of Meeting shall, at a minimum contain, the following information: the location, day and thne of the meeting, the topics to be discussed, and the nature of the decision to be made or of the business to be transacted. A copy of the Agenda for the meeting may be substituted for the Notice of Meeting if all the required information is provided. Conduct of Meetings Section 6.03. (a) Meetings of members shall be presided over by the President of the Association or, in his absence, by the First Vice President, or, in absence of both, the Second Vice President, of in the absence of the President and Vice Presidents, any other Director of the Association present at the meeting, or if no dinetots or officers an: present, by a chairman chosen by a majority of the members present. (13) The Secretary of the Association Shall act as Secretary of all meetings of members, provided that in his absence the presiding offwer shall appoint another person to act as Secretary of the meeting. (c) Meetings shall be governed by Robert's RuleS of Order, as such rules may be revised, insofar as such rules are not inconsistent with or in conflict with these Bylaws, with the Articles of the Association or with State hw. QuoruIn Section 6.04. The presence of f~teen percent (15 %) of the Members of the Association shall constitute a quorum to call to order or tramact business at any Regular or noticed Special Meeting. In the absence of a quorum, no business shall be transacted and the only motion which the chair shall entertain is a motion to adjourn. If after the offmial opening of any meeting, the quorum is lost, the members present may continue w transact business until adjournment, if any actions taken (other than adjournment) are appwved by at least a majority of the members of the Association required W constitute a quorum. vothig Section 6.05. Voting shall be by voice vote, except that the election of Directors shall be by secret ballot. Members shall not be permitted to vote or act by proxy, or cumulatively vote. ARTICLE VII. F_,XECUllON OF INSTR~S, DEPOSITS, AND FUNDS Execution of Tn~ruments Section 7.01. The Board of Directors, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Articles of Association or these Bylaws, may by resolution authorize any officer or agent of the Association to enter into any contract and deliver any instruments in the name of and on behalf of the Association, and such authority may be general or confined to specific instances, provided, however, that such contract or delivery is expressly authorized in the Charier, Bylaws, and/or approved by the vote or written consent of a majority of the members of the Association. The President, and the Secretary or Treasurer shall, upon being directed by the Board of Directors or the membership, sign all leases, contracts, or other instruments in writing of the Association. Checks and Notes Section 7.02. Except as otherwise specifically dewmined by resolution of the Board of Directors, provided for in Section 7.01, by the Articles of this Association, or as otherwise required by law, all checks, drdts, promissory notes, orders for the payment of money, and other evidences of indebtedness of this Association shall be signed by the Treasurer, or Assistant Treasurer, and countersigned by another officer of the Association. Deposits Section 7.03. All funds of the Association shall be deposited to the credit of the Association in such banks, trust companies, or other depositaries as the Board of Directors may select. ARTICLE VIII. ARBITRATION OF CONTROVERSIES Section 8.01. (a) Any contwversy between members involving their membership or rights shall, on the written request of either member thereto, fled with the President or Secretary of the Association, be submitted to arbitration, and such arbitration shall, except as otherwise herein provided, comply with Sections 1281 through 1288.1 of the California Civil Code of Procedure. (b) gach 'party to the controversy shall select one (1) Member of the Association as an arbitrator and the two arbitrators so selected shall select a third arbitrator from among the Board of Directors, and the third afoitrator shall be the neutral arbitrator. (c) The neutral arbitrator shall appoint a time and place for the hearing and cause notice thereof to be served personally or by registered or certified mail on the parties to the arbitration and the other arbitrators not less than seven (7) days before the hearing, provided, however, that appearance at the heaxing waives the right W notice. (d) The neutral arbitrator may adjourn or continue the hearing as necessary. On request of a party to the arbitration for good cause, or on his own determination, the neutral arbitrator may postpone the hearing to a time not later than the date fixed by the agreement for making the ward, or to a later date if the parties to the afoitration consent thereto. (e) The Neutral arbitrator shall preside at the hearing, shall rule on the admission and exclusion of evidence and on questions of hearing procedure and shall exercise all powers relating to the conduct of the hearing. (f) The parties to the arbitration are entitled to be hear, to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses appearing at the hearing, but rules of evidence and rules of judicial procedure need not be observed. (g) The award shall be in writing and signed by the arbitrators concurring therein. It shall include a determination of all the questions to the arbitrators the decision of which is necessary in order to determine the controversy. (h) The neutral aeoitrator shall serve a signed copy of the award on each party to the arbitration personally or by registered or certified mail. (i) The award shall be made within thixty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing, provided, however, that the objection that the award was not timely made is waived unless the party objecting gives the arbitrators written notice of this objection prior to the service of a signed copy of the award on him. (j) The manner of con'ecting and enforcing the award shall be prescribed in Sections 1284 and 1285 through 1288.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. ARTICLE IX. BYLAWS Adoption, Amendment, and Repeal Section 9.01. These Bylaws shall become effective on their being signed by the original Directors of the Association, or on their adoption by the vote or written consent of a majority of the members of this Association. These Bylaws may be amended or repealed, in whole or in part, and new Bylaws adopted by the vote or written consent of a majority of the Directors of the Association. All members of the Association shall be notified of all amendments to these Bylaws. Certification and Inspection Section 9.02. The original or a copy of the Bylaws, as amended or otherwise altered to date, certified by the Secretary of the Association, shall be recorded and kept in a book which shall be kept in the principal office of the Association, and such book shall be open to inspection by the members at all masonable time during office hours. ARTICLE X. REPORTS, FISCAL YEAR, INSIGNIA, AND SEAL .Annual Report and Financial Statement Section 10.01 (a) The Board of Directors Shall Cause a written annual report, including a financial statement, to be prepaxed and submitted to the members in April of each year. The t~port shall summarize the Association' s activities for the preceding year and activities projected for the forthcoming year. (b) The financial statement shall consist of a balance sheet, as of the close of business of the corporation's fiscal year, a summary of receipts and disbursements, and be prepared in such manner and form as is sanctioned by sound accounting practices and certified by the Treasurer or a certified public accountant. MAI~S'i'xByLAW.FIN 15 As Am~de.d by 11~ ~ of Dix~tors 31181oA (c) The fiscal year for the Association s~all April 1 through March 31. Insignia and Seal Section 10.02. The Board of Directors may adopt, use, alter, or cancel an Association insignia or seal, or both, and by rule shall prescribe the time, manner, and place in wlxich such insignia may be worn or used. ARTICf.R XI. CONSTRUCTION Section 11.01. As used in thes~ Bylaws: (a) The present tense includes the past and future tenses, and the future tense includes the present. (b) The masculine gender includes f~minine and neuter. (c) The s'mgular number includes the plural, and the plural number includes the singular. (d) The word "shall" is idawry and the word "may" is permissive. (e) The words "Directors" and "Board" as used in these bylaws in relation to any power or duty requiring collective action, mean "Board of Directors". (f) The word "Article" as used in these bylaws means the Ardcles of Incorporation or charter for the Association. ADOPTION We, the undersigned, are all of the persons named as fifft Directors in the Charter of this Association, and hereby amend and adopt the attached Bylaws of said Association. to Director Director 16 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY ATTORNEY'S LETI'ER R:',HOGAND\MAINST.CC2 11F7194 dwb 10 LAW OFFICES BURKE, WILLIAMS & SOREN~EN AUgust 27, 1994 Mr. Gary Thornhill Director of Planning City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 RECEIVED AUG3 119, .. Re: Bylaws for the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association Dear Gary: I have reviewed the Articles of Association and the Bylaws of the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association. The qualifications for membership are minimal and allow for any merchant or resident in the Old Town area, as well as other interested persons, to become members of the Association. These documents are sufficient to allow the Association to function as the administrator of the Mainstreet Program. If another entity will administer the Program, these documents can serve as the model documents for the new entity. Any agreement between the City and the Association or another entity which will administer the program should require that the Bylaws and Articles of Association or Incorporation not be amended without the approval of the City so as to allow the City to confirm that the membership requirements and the authority of the entity are consistent with Council policies. The qualifications required to become a member of the Association are set forth in Section 2.01 of the Bylaws which provides: "The qualifications for membership are as follows: any reputable person (at least eighteen (18) years of age), business, association, corporation, partnership or estate interested in the continued economic health and cultural vitality of Old Town, shall be eligible for membership." Mr. Gary Thornhill August 27, 1994 Page 2 Although Section 2.03 provides that members are admitted upon the approval by a majority of the Board of Directors or the Board's designee, very few grounds exist for the Board to deny membership. Thus, it is clear from the Bylaws that any merchant of the Old Town area and others interested in the Old Town area may become members of the Association. The Bylaws also provide for members to be elected to the Board of Directors governing the Association. Section 3.01 of the Bylaws provides for a seven member board of Directors to govern the Association and Section 3.02 requires that a Director of the Association be a member for at least one year. Section 3.06 provides for an election for certain Director positions each year by the full membership. Meetings of the Board are governed by Section 3.11, however no provision exists requiring Board of Directors meetings to be open to members. Section 6.01 of the Bylaws provides that the Board shall set the time of regular meetings of the membership. Notice to individual members of the meeting of the full membership need not be given; provided, however, that such notice is required before action can be taken on the following proposals: "(1) a proposal to sell, lease, convey, exchange, transfer, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the property or assets of the Association; (2) any proposal relating to the real property of the Association; (3) any proposal to incorporate; (4) any proposal to amend the Articles Of this Association; or (5) any proposal to dissolve the Association." The Articles of Association provide broad powers to the Association to implement the purposes of the Association. Article II of the Articles of Association set forth the purposes of the Association as follows: "A. To promote and market Old Town Temecula; B. To support economic development in and around Old Town Temecula; C. To encourage the preservation and re-use of historic structures in Old Town Temecula; and D. To improve the general welfare and the civic betterment of Old Town Temecula." Mr. Gary Thornhill August 27, 1994 Page 3 Article III describes the legal powers of the Association. These powers include (1) the power to sue and be sued, (2) the power to enter into and perform contracts, (3) the power to enter into commercial transactions authorized by the California Commercial Code, (4) the power to buy, lease, sell and encumber real property and to construct buildings on real property, and (5) the power to conduct activities that ful~ther the purposes of the Association. All of the powers of the Association are qualified by the fact that they must be exercise so as to further the purposes of the Association set forth in Article II. Article IX prohibits the Association from participation in or intervention in any political campaign on behalf of a candidate for public office. If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to call me at any time. Ronald Bradley David Hogan/ very truly yours, Peter M. Thorson of Burke, Williams & Sorensen ITEM 36 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager November 15, 1994 Auto Mall Marquee Loan Funding Prepared by: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager Gary Thornhill, Planning Director RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council reconsider a loan to the Auto Dealers Association of Temecula to erect an auto mall marquee and provide staff direction concerning possible site relocation and design revisions. BACKGROUND: On October 12, 1993, the City Council authorized a loan to the Auto Dealers Association of Temecula in the amount of $280,000 for an Auto Mall Marquee. The auto dealers have not yet accepted the loan and are now interested in revising certain terms of it. The loan will carry an interest rate of prime plus 2%. The loan will assist in eliminating blight in the project area by enhancing sales and, thereby, preventing the decline of one-use facilities, creating and maintaining jobs in the area, and enhance opportunities for development in nearby areas. The term of the loan is for seven years with an additional three year option. The Auto Dealers Association will receive credit toward repayment of the loan for the incremental increase in sales tax generated by the Auto Dealers. Fiscal year 1993-1994will be used as the base year. Sales tax collected by the City from auto sales during the base year was approximately $913,644. The amount paid back and/or credited will be $57,040 per year. It is understood that each dealer's obligation could be reduced if additional dealerships are established in the City. If the number of dealerships decreases, the City will add the amount of the loan payments to the end of the loan period. It is also understood that the Auto Dealers Association will provide a reasonable amount of time on the marquee for public service messeges. The dealers are requesting Council consider three additional items: 1) If a dealership goes out of business, the base year is reduced for purposes of computing the incremental increase. 2) If no increase in sales tax is realized, the entire payment would be added to the end of the loan period. 3) Any increase in sales tax over the annual loan payment would be applied to the payment of the following year. If the Council desires to fund the loan, staff would not recommend items I or 2. Maintenance of the signs would be the responsibility of the Auto Dealer's Association. The Planning approvals for the marquee were as follows: Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No, 2 and Variance No. 13 (Marquee) was approved by the City Council on August 10, 1993. The project is a proposal for a two (2) sided, seventy-three (73) foot high sign with electronic message board for the Temecula Valley Auto Mall located at the rear potion of Toyota of Temecula (26631 Ynez Road). The approval is effective until August 10, 1995, unless an extension of time is filed in compliance with current City Ordinances. Condition of Approval No. 9 for the project required that prior to the issuance of building permits: "All members of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall who chose to advertise on the electronic message board portion of the sign shall submit an agreement with the City of Temecula which will be recorded with the County Recorder. The agreement shall stipulate that all members and future members will forego requesting any additional freeway oriented signage as long as the Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee is erected. The addition of any future advertisers on the electronic message board of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee will cause the agreement to be amended, No additional advertisers will be permitted to be displayed upon the Marquee until the amended agreement is recorded." This condition of approval is in effect until the project expires and would apply to any freeway oriented signage requests brought forward by the auto dealers. As of this date, the dealers are considering relocating the sign to a site currently owned by Kemper. They are also giving consideration to updating the technology of the sign. If either or both occur, staff is requesting Council direction as to whether Council desires to approve the final location and design. Under the existing Planning approval process, these approvals would be handled by the Planning Director, Staff is supportiveof this agreement as it will remedy the potential of an increasing number of auto dealer signs along Interstate 15. FISCAL IMPACT: The loan will be funded by the Redevelopment Agency. The term of the loan is seven years at a rate of prime plus 2%. Temecula Automob.e 41895 Notor Car Parkway Temecula, CA 92591 November 15v 1994 Mary JaneMcLarney Assistant City Manager City of Temecula by messenger Dear Mary Jane: The members of the Temecula Valley Automobile Dealers Association met on Thursday, October 27, 1994 and again on Tuesday, Nevember S, 1994 to discuss our position on the proposed City of Temecula loan for the Temecula= Auto Mall Marquee. Vote was taken. The dealers unanimously agreed to request reconsiderorion of the loan The dealers have agreed with the following: · The base year for incremental tax calculation would be City of Temecula fiscal 1993/1994. m The City of Temecula put in force the means to require that any new franchised automobile dealers opening in Temecula be added to the sign agreement. Following.our meetings, you informed me that the interest rate to be charged would be prime plus two points, significantly higher than the investment rate to which the City had previously agreed. A telephone poll of the dealers has secured their agreement to the higher rate. We would, however, appreciate that the City consider all means of financing this project and provide the best rate possible. The Temecula Valley Automobile Dealers Association consists of the following dealers: Steve Palmet Terry Gilmore Dan Atwood Tim Burke Dick Kennedy Eric Gosch Nissan of Temecula Paradise Chevrolet-Buick-Geo Toyota of Temecula Valley Carriage Motor Company Norm Reeves Super Group Rancho Ford Thank you for your consideration. Steve Palmet President cc: City of Teme~ula Councilmembers Gary Thornhill? Planning Director Temecula Valley Automobile Dealers A~sociation ITEM 37 ITEM 4 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 15, 1994 Community Services Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two Council members to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee to review applications for Community Services Funding. DISCUSSION: Each year the City solicits applications for an annual review of funding requests from Community Based Organizations (non-profits). We have received the applications for Fiscal Year 1994-95 and are recluesting that the City Council select two members of the Council to participate in the review of these applications. We anticipate that the review will consist of one meeting. The committee will be dissolved after the review takes place. ITEM 38 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 15, 1994 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Goals and Objectives PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution defining the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Goals and Objectives. BACKGROUND: Section 2.44.050 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code (Public/Traffic Safety Commission - Powers and Duties) states that the duties of the public/traffic safety commission shall be established by resolution of the city council. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has held two meetings, one in September and one in October, to formulate a proposed list of Commission Goals and Objectives. The Commission asked staff to be present to answer questions and provide input. The outcome of the meeting was to present the tentative list of duties at the October 2?th meeting of the P/TSC for formal action. At that meeting the Commission voted 4 to I in favor of presenting the attached list of duties to City Council for consideration. Commissioner Guerriero was strongly opposed to the wording of item number 5, feeling that the commission should NOT participate in the budget process at all. The other Commissioners felt that participating in the budgeting activities by PREVIEWING and COMMENTING could only help by supplying additional data for Staff to make an informed decisions. Staff felt that the Commissioners understood that their comments were only advisory and felt that they would feel no animosity for non-inclusion. FISCAL IMPACT: Nofie Attachments: Proposed Duties of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission -1- r.~dtpt\94~l 115'~.~ir~.¢om sol TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD OCTOBER 11, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:36 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Jeff Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Director Mu~oz requested the removal of Item No. 2 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar No. 1. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 27, 1994. Utility Aoreements for Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-O3CSD Councilmember Mu~oz asked if it is standard to pay fees to other public agencies. General Manager Ron Bradley responded this is standard procedure. Councilmember Mu~oz asked what these fees are based on. Interim Director of Public Works Joe Kicak explained the fees are based on the length of trench and services provided. Minums. CSD\101194 -1- 7/19/94 Temecula CommuniTy Services District Minutes October 11, 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract for Extension of Electric Line Underground with Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to provide for installation of an underground line extension to Pala Community Park. 2.2 2.3 Authorize the Payment of SCE application fees in the amount of $16,235.71. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Water System Construction Agreement and the Agency Agreement with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to provide for installation of domestic water service to Pala Community Park. The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:42 PM to a meeting on October 18, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\Board Secretary Jeff Stone, President Minutes. CSD\101194 -2- ?/19/94 ITEM 2 APPROV CITY Aq'I'ORNE~~ FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager November 15, 1994 Community Services Recreation Brochure REPA ED BY Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Accept proposal of 915,039 from Graphics Unlimited to print one (1) issue of the Community Services Recreation Brochure. DISCUSSION: A Request for Proposal (RFP) was released by the City to solicit proposals for the development and professional production of the Community Services Recreation Brochure. The winter/spring issue will be distributed city-wide on January 6, 1995. The brochure will include 24 pages with a glossy, full color, seventy-weight outer cover and glossy seventy- weight interior pages. Services provided will include design, camera ready art work, type setting layout, final printing and delivery to the U.S. Post Office for bulk direct mail delivery. The proposals, including sales tax, were submitted as follows: 1. Graphics Unlimited 915,039 2. Maurice Printers 915,403 3. Penny Saver Solo Direct 918,329 It is staff's recommendation to award production of the recreation brochure to Graphics Unlimited as the lowest, qualified bidder. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to produce one (1) issue of the Recreation Brochure will not exceed 915,039. Unencumbered funds exist in account #190-180-999-5222. ITEM 3 APPROV CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Agreement and Bonds - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc. PREPARED BY: ~c~ ~¥~'" Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Accept the agreement and surety bonds provided by the developer to improve the perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 23125-1 - Kaufman and Broad o~ San Diego, Inc. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract No. 23125-1 ,the developer is proposing to improve the perimeter slope areas along Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road for dedication to the City for maintenance purposes. To insure these areas are constructed to City standards, staff has required the developer to post security to improve the site based upon the certified construction cost for the improvements. As a result, Kaufman and Broad has entered into an agreement with the City and has provided surety bonds, issued by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and the American Insurance Company, as follows: AMCAS Faithful Performance Bond No. 13764021 in the amount of $95,000. AIC Faithful Performance Bond No. 11133152287in the amount of 995,000. AMCAS Labor and Materials Bond No. 137649021 in the amount of 947,500. AIC Labor and Materials Bond No. 11133152287in the amount of 947,500. AMCAS Warranty Bond No. 137649021 in the amount of 99,500. AIC Warranty Bond No. 11133152287in the amount of 99,500. The Bonds will be retained until final acceptance of the landscaping is completed and acceptance has been approved by the Board of Directors. Staff will then recommend that the Board of Directors authorize the reduction or release of the bonds. Upon acceptance of the aforementioned bonds, the City Clerk is authorized to release the landscape bonds which were previously issued by Developers Insurance Group for the Toman Company, Inc., as follows: Faithful Performance Bond No. 136485S in the amount of $190,000. Labor and Materials Bond No. 136485S in the amount of 895,000. Warranty Bond No. 136485S in the amount of 819,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of construction for this area will be borne by the developer. Staff anticipates that operation and maintenance costs will be included in the FY 1995-96 budget for Service Level C. ATTACHEMENTS: 1. Site/Location Map. 2. Copies of Agreement and Bonds. SITE/LOCATION MAP TRACT NO. 23125-1 BOND NO. 11133152287 - AIC PREMIUM: $1,093.00 CITY O1= T~'vIECULA PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE FAITHlrLFL PEILFORIvIANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City of Temccula, State of California, and KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SAN DIEGO, INC. (heroinafter designated as 'Principal") have entered into an A~eement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain parkland Improvements, which said Agreement, dated 19__, and identified as Project STERLING RANCH TRACT 23125-1 , is hereby refcrr~t to and made a part hereof; and WI-~-REAS, Principal is r~!uired under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful Performance of the Agreement; AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA AND THE NOW, TIq'FREFORE, we the Principal and AMERICAN INSURANCE C{~s surety, am held and fin-rely bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of $19o. 000.00 , lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if the above-bounded Princ!pal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to, ab~de by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and pcffformed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to his or their tru~ intent and me~qnlng, and shall indemnify and save hardaless the City of Ternecnia, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a pan of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face mount speci.fie, therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fee~, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed az costs and included in any judgement rendered. The surety hereby Stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the saxne shall in anyway affect its obligations on tkis bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of tixne, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or the work or to the specLfications. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// .' /// III IN WITNF_.SS WI-IEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above naxned, on ncmna~. ~ ~ , 19 9~ (Seal) (Seal) AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY SIJI~TY: OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA LIABILITY LIMIT: $95,000.00 JKAN L. WILLCOX (Name) ATTORNEY-TN-FACT (Title) SURETY: THE AbIERICAN INSURANCE COM]?ANY State of CALIFORNIA County of SAN DIEGO On 10/14/94 before me, PAMELA J. ARAGON p vsonallyappeared JOHN W. FULBRIGHT and WILLIAM R. CARDON rsonaily known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed KAUFMAN AND BROAD PR.IlqCIP;J_: OF SAN DIEGO, INC. No zcs CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER r-I INDIViDUAL(S) Yi~XCORpORATE Vice Presid, President OFFICER(S) Trn. EISI [] PARTNER(S) [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: ............. %~ the same in his/her/their authorized  PAMELAJ, ARAGON capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their COMM. ~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), NOt DIEGO COUNTy ~' NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTTT~f(IES) u ~TuPtt'~'C°iif°m~ ~ ortheentityuponbehalfofwhichtheperson(s) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: y cornre. ex;4tes ~ 12 1~6 cted, executed the instrument. .......... ~'~ 'Witness ha d ~"d"Offi' t seal. .; CE IFICATE Title or Type of Document ST BE A'I'rACHED TO THE DOCUMENT er of Pages Date o Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT. S gner(s) Other Than Named Above THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY |ers~Fe~-~t~/Z0.|~4~.andred~atediotheSmeorN · . ~~t~ay~.~,eor ...... JEAN L. WILLCOX ...... JLeUl~aodinwTulAttorf~s).-hi. FI,K~a,wtthfu~ wefsndauthodtykre oonfeffu!laluotm~,p~udst~d. toa~'~M,k~,k-.k~t4~d/~ud~muy ~ I~r.of nttornr/Is ~t.,.~ p~suut to A~clc VII. ~'dons 4~ and 4~ of By-laYs of ~ A~EIUCAN IN~UP~ANC'~ COMPAJ~Y a~w In f~l foist and ofa~o~lsd~du~a~bytka~lbodlyof~fo~nlg~lut;~a d ~dof~sof~E~Rl~ a~, ~M t~ dlMt~ ~ any ~-~cnt, ~ut ~, ~d Bulkel ~nt ~n~ 0,r ~ ~riGH, a~ ~ ~ of Ih~ ~ my ~ I ff~ ~ ~t~ ~ lay ~e Of ltt~My, H any Twain of uy F~ of Mt~, ff N u7 ~JC~te r~t~ t~o. ~ fanimP, ~ ~ ~ of atto~, uy ~ of uy ~w~ of att~, ~ ~l~te ~q s~h fm~ ~tutt ~ fa~e ~ ~d k ~ ud bi~inl ~ WHE~OF, THE ~ERIC~ I ~U~N~ ~MPA~ ~ ~u~ t~ pt~na to k si~ by hs ~-Ptu~nt. ~ ju ~ate gd to '~nto~u~ 18~ ~y~ June .1990 By THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY STATEOFCALIFORNIA } m. COUNTYOFMARIN O~sthls 1St dayor June , 19 t)0 ,heforcmepersoau/1 came R.D. Farnsworth , to me kn~wa. who, b~n/by m~ duly worn. did depos~ and say: that he Is V~-Pruld~:t of THE ~TI~IC. AN INSU~qCE COMPANY, the Corporation ~ In knd which ue~t~l ~ above Inurun~nt: that he known the soul of stld C~rp~ado~; t~al the gd afFtud to the t4id la.b'umenl Is ~ch co~p4rale 0u~;thathwus~a~L~edby~t(kf~ftheBo0~rd~fD{2ea~rs~fuJdC~f1~raL~and'kathes~$nedhis~suntthete~b~fke~td~ IN W~ WHEREOF. I have hee~mto s~ my hand and affi3ted my offictaJ Ka/. the day and year hetein f'un aheve writtea. OFF/CIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC- CALIFORNIA Prlmi~al Office k Ms~ ~ ~OF~R~ ~OF~RIN CI. KZUSC. A3'S 3~711-TA-4-~0 (RI~) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES On 10/11/94 before me, BETTY WALKER, NOTARY PUBLIC DATE NAME, TITLE OF O~t-FICER - E G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBUC' personally appeared JF_~q L. WILLCOX NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personS) whose name(s~) is/a~ subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that-be/she/tbe~ executed the same in t;s/her/fi~ei; authorized capacity(~es), and that by ~-,is/her/tt;=ei~ signatureS) on the instrument the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~) acted, executed the instrument. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDiAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF R~ABtNG, PENNSYLVANIA SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ¢)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSC)CIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave.. P.O, BOx 7184 · Canoga Park. CA 91309-7184 Atnertcan ss, a~uan~ ~,ompanI 01 Reading, P®nnsylvanll CNA All tJs~ C4m mltmcnu Yott Mike' :es/Chic~fe, Illln~s,~ POWER OF 'ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know All Men bI Ihese Presents. Tlgt AMERICAN CASUALI'f CO MPAJ, t'Y OF READING. P~NNSYLVANIA. a corDor,tt~o~ dul/{~;lamztd and exiStartI under the IlwS Of the Co~rno~wealffi of PennSyNan~, and hayinIds prsnc~pal office sn the Cdy Of ChucKle, end $tale of lllinO~S. 6o,esherebymke. co~ststuteandappotnt Jean L. I~111cox, Wesley R. Downey, Pamela L. Jacobs, Larry G. O'Donnell, Individually Los Angeles, California Zn Unlimited Amounts - and to b,nd AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. F~NNSYLVANIA thereby as fully and Io the gm~ exlent aS if such instruments were solned h the duly authorszeal OffiCerS ~ AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. P~NNSYLVANIA and all the acts of g~d Atlorne.v. pursuant to the authority hereby l,ven are hereby ratified and confirmed, Thss Power of Attorney iS m~de and executed pursuant to and by authority of the IoflowinI By. Law duly adopted by the Board of D,rect~rs of the, Comp,lny' "Atllcle VI-Extcut|on of Oblipt|on.s Ind Appofnlmenl of Allorne}'.in-Fect ~ecteon2 A~ntntent of Att~tn~y.m~act. The Pr e$~den~ or V~ce Pre~ident m~y. frorn time l~ tim~ ap~dnt by writt en certi~k`J t~ att~r neys~ m-lid to act m bahall of the Company In the execution Of pohcies Of insurines. bonds, unded~!kinJ$ ind other obhiatory instruments of like n4ture $u¢h attornelt.gn.tact. Subled 1o the hmitat~on$ Set forth in the~r respective CEddK4lCS O~ authority, shall have full Dower to b, nd the Present o~ the Boatel of D~rectots may at any hm4 revoke all power and author'try previously Iwen to iny attorney.in.tact." Th~s POwer of Attorney ~$ $iined and Sealed by ticscrude under and by the luthorify Of the Ioaow~nI Resolution adopted by the Board ot -letors of the Conepatty &I a meet,hi duly ulled and held on the llth d,gy of NOvember. 3966: · 'Resolved. that the S~£Mture Of the Prl$tdent or a V~Ce PresKJent and the Seal of the ComNny rney be affixecl by ticsimile on an)' power Of attorney Irariled pursuant to Se:t~on 2 of Allude VI of the By-Laws. and the $~linatu~e ot the ~ret&ry or In Assistant ~S..e~r(ar,/end $~ln4ture$ end Seal shall be valid and b~ndmI On the Company Any SUCh ~er SO executed and Sealed and ced~hed by ced~ft.,Ite So executed and Sealed shall. wtth reslx~t to any ~ or undertakm{ to which d ,s attached. COntinue to be v/lid and b,ndmI on the h .  AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA co~.zy ~l coo~ I 'f I J. E. Pvrtell V~ce PresK~ent. On thG 6th e,y Of September . le~ 90 belore me ~ers~n~lll ume J- E Purlell. to me known. who. bean rn~ Gu swo~n. dKI dense and M ' that he res&des ,n the Vdlaie Of Glenvsew, State of Ilhn06 th~t he ss a V~ce-Pres~ent of AMERICAN CAS~J~LI~ COM~A~IY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA. the cotporat,~ descnbe~ :n the wh:ch ezecuted the above ecknow4edie$ $,lrn~ tO ID; the act an~ deed of/4id CERTIFICATE I, George R. Nobaugh, Asslslenl Seerslet of AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, P~NNSYLVANIA, do cerli/y thor Ihe Power of Attorney he~ein above eel forth Is still in force, ind luther cedlly tlgt Seption 2 of Article VI Of the By. Laws of the COmpany sndlhe Resolution ot the Bo~d of Directors, sel forth in s~ld Power ot Attorney Ito still In force. In lestimony Whetlot I have hereunto Subscribed my m end "lxed the ml Of the laid Company this 11 dr/9f 0ctobeT' .IP 94. ~ CITY OF t'VfECULA PREMIUM INCLUDED IN FP PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND WHR'RE~S, the City of Temecula, State of C~Ufornia, and KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SAN DIEGO, INC; (hereina/'ter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Ag~reement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete cemin Parkland Improvements, which said A=~-mement, dated , 19 , and identified as Project STERLING RANCH TRACT 23,125-1 is hereby referred to and made a par~ hereof; and WR']=-R. FAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to fi/e a good and sufficienn payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA AND THE NOW, TH}--~LEFORE, we the principal andAMERIcAN INSURANCE CO-as Surety, are held and fh-m/y bound unto the City of Temecula, C~]ifornia, and all cont_ractor3, subcontractors, laborers, mater~slmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, hn the penal sum of $ 95 ,ooo.Q(lawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for mounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an mount not exceeding the mount set forth. As a par~ of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face mount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expense~ and fee~, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgemerit rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and a~v, ed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to ffte claims under Tide 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so a~ to ~ve a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change. s, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the A~reement or to the work or to the specifications. IN xTvrI-N'F. SS Vv'}-t'~.P,..EOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on OCTOBER 1] , 19 %, (S~l) (Se~l) AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY SLrI~'I'Y: OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA LIABILITY-~IMIT: $47,500.00 BY: ~ ~, .... , JEAN L. WELLCOX (NANnS) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT SURETY: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY JEAN L. WILLCOX ( Name ) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT (Title) KAUFMAN AND BROAD pRINCIPAL' OF SAN DIEGO, INC. By: ,~'~ ~ [~, ~,~ By: , ~ APPROVED AS TO FORNI: CALIFORNIA State of } ' r~ounty of SAN DTEGO OnI 10 / '14 / 9 4 before me, 13ATE PAMELA J. ARAGON CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDiVIDUAL(S) ~CORPORATE Vice Presid, President OFFiCER(S) TrTL~iS) [] PARTNER(S) [] AI'rORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: personally appeared JOHN W. FULBRIGHT and WILLIAM R. CARDON rsonally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to methat he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their ............. t signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), eMyPAMELAJ. AP, AGON ortheer'Jt~ nbehalfofwhichtheperson(s) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: t ~ DI~_,O COUNW ' ' n icial sea cornre. ex~'es A,~ 12.1 ATTFJfTION NOTARY: Atmougn me inton'nat~on recluested I:>elow Is OPTIONAL, ~t EC3uk~ Or'~,em ffaudul'eRYarmcnmenz ot tins certfficale to unaumonzed Ooc~Jment, t Ti,,e or T pe o, Do ..men, ' ; TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above .t CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES On ] 0/11/94 before me, BETTY WALKER, NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared JEAN L. WILLCOX [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(~ whose name(s) is/af,-e subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that ~'~e/she/t~t'a~ executed the same in ~x~s/her/t3a~M~ authorized capacity~s), and that by ~i~/her/t~e~: signatureC~) on the instrument the person(U, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~ acted, executed the instrument. · ~ BET'rY WALKER NOTARY PUBLIC- CAUFORNIA LOS ANGEL[.S COUN~ · M~' Cornre. ExOires Sept. 20. 1997 OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by taw, it may prove valuabte to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF A]'rACHED DOCUMENT Tm.E(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] AI'FORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OFPAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remrnet Ave., PO. BOx 71 154 · Canoga ParK. CA 91309-7184 tomot AFtOWNEr THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ...... JEAN L. WILLCOX ...... mtroeaodtaw~ulAstoa~(s)-ia-r. aa~,.vdthrun wetsndaudsczdtybxrc azrervedtalutmu~.pbc~udacst. touccu~.scal. acbsow~Ltes~d~vcru7 snd~bends,~___.,,~kinS. m:or -.-~.o~c~wrhtcuo~ll~atSoust,l~utu, O~sol' .................................... eadtob~fsdtheCerlxx~Lioathacb ufullla~dtoU~um~cxl~tulls~hkmdswcgs bY the Pteddart, Jcttedwl0sth~caxporatcsaloftbc This powcr.of at~ornry Is Zraated porturn to ArLjdc VII, SectJoas 43 and 4~ of ~By-laws of THR AMXRJCAN I~UKANC~ COMpAI. s'Y now Lu full fotcg sad ~A~6c~ V1L A~o~M~s~ ~sd Awr-~r~(~ ~f Res~mj. ~ Af.~or~t.~..b~ct ~ad ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~.6~A~r~rt~T~eau~`~P/~fsaK.~Re~deMAnb~s~cs~s~es~A~e/~a.~rkqsm~A~sud.`wbeu~M~~ ~ ~ofa~o~lsst~un~a~bytkauthodtyof~foHo~nl~lutl~a ~ ~of~sof~E~ERI~ '~L~, ~g t~ ggMtm of any ~-~dent, ~t ~a ~d Rulknt ~m ~n~ of ~ ~rmd~ a~ ~ ~ of th~ ~&~ ~y ~ a f~ ff ~t~ ~ any ~ of &terRy, ~ any tff~n of uy ~wff of Mt~ n ~ uy ~lF~tc t~ tk~o. ~ fani m~. k~nto~ru~ 1st ~y~ June ,1990 THE AIV~RICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ~f. ATE OF CALIFOP, NIA } m, COUNTY OF MARIN Onehis [st daTof June ,1990,b~forcmeperson~el cam, R.D. Farnsworlh , to mc Icnowu0 who, Ixtnl by me dull prom. did d{pos~ an-4 say: that he is Vk~-praidcnt of THE ~I~ICAN INSUR, ANCE COMPANY. fix Corporation descr[bcd tn ~d whJc~ cxoc~ted Ik abovc ~AKnament; that he knots ~ sui of said Corp~x atlon; t~at the sc, d afVncd to the Mid instzum4mt is suds co~poeate ecsl; dsst Is w'u so gllxed by order of thc Ik~rd of Directors of slid CorporaLion sad tisst he s[lnod hLs nsac Lim't4o by ]lkt ~'der. IN WZ'I'NI~$ WHEREOF, I have hcreunto set my hLqd and alTn,-4 my ofi':cts] KaJ. the day and ),es~ h~ctn rv:st ahQvt wrillea. OFFICIAL SEAL I.M. VANDff0RT NOTARY PUBLIG-GALIFORNIA Prlm:i~a~ 0fi1~0 b Msrio $TATR OP CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MARIN ! theund~,ResMentAssistettSeaeu. ryofTHEAMERICANINSURANCECOMPANY, e NEBRASKA ~,DOHEIUEBYC'E~,TIFI'Ihat ~b~fotelOI lad ~Ui~h~dP~WER~FAT~Q~1~NEY~mEinsinf~1f~rcgand~sun~¢b~:~m~ked;~nd~d~gn~t~V~4~ud~f~ By4a,irs of tn~ Cot~Lion. ud the Res~ufio~ of the Board of DIsccgocs~ gt forth bs the Powff of Attoag/, ~ aow bs force. S:t&sz~udsc~ledsttl~CounF/ofM&rt~,DMeddm= '[l d,yor r~,-.t-~h~..,- 19 q/' 3(4111-TA4-g~ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFOKNIA County of LOS ANGELES On 10/11/94 DATE personally appeared [] personally known to me before me, BETTY WALKER, NOTARY PUBLIC JEAN L. WILLCOX - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactoq/evidence to be the personS) whose name(~ is/af4~ subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that J~e/she/ibey: executed the same in ~s/her/t~s~i:r authorized capacity~es), and that by ~is/her/th~i~: signature(Ji) on the instrument the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s} acted, executed the instrument. COMM,//1003839 NOTARY PUBUC - CALIFORNIA ~.OS ANGELES COUNTY My ~mm. [xpir5 ~Ot. 20+ 1~7 OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF AI'rACHED DOCUMENT Tm, E(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES} AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PKNNSYLV&NIA SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE O1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P+O. BOx 7184 · Canoga ParK, CA 91309-7184 American Casualty Company of Raiding, P®nnsylvlnll C'NA Tot All t)~ C4mmltNnti YoM Male° POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT IRon All Men b)' Ihell Prosenit,, That AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA, a co~poral~ duly o~lan,zed ar~ ezlst,nI under the Uwl, of the Commonwealth ~1 Penns)lvankl. and hewnI its ~',nc¢~ll office m the Cdy o{ Ch,calo. and SlateOItllin~>iS. cJ, oesheret)yrnake. conshtute and appoint Jean L. Ifil lcox, I~esley R. Oov~ney, Pamela L. Jacobs, Larry G. 0'Donnell. individually d Los Angeles, California ~s true and ~ul Attorney.an. Fad wdh fur power and authority hereby conferred to S~ln. Hal and e~Kute m ~S beha~ bonds. undedaklnls and other O~lato,'T instruments d similar Mture - In Unlimited Amounts - and to b,nd AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. F~[NNSYI. VANIA thereby as full}. and to lhe s~rne talent as if Such mstrutnents were telned the the duly authorized olfK;ers ol AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. I~NNSYLVANIA and all the acts ot lard Att~ney. pursuant to the authority hereby liven ire he,eby ratified and co~rn'te~. Th,s Power of Attorney IS n~lde and executed pursuant tO and by authority Of the tolloweI By. Law duly adopted by the Board of Directod'$ ol the, Company "Adlcle Vl- Execution el Ob~lafioqs Ind Appolnlmenl el Atlorntl'.ln.Flcl Sect,on 2 ApDo,ntment ot Atepiney-re.tact. The Pres~denl or V~ce President my. from time to hme. apfx~nl by write en ceditt, ates attorneyS- in-tad to act m behalf ol the Company m the axecut,on ot POIK~eS Of msurance. bonds. undedakinls and other obl~iatory rostrum, antS Of like nature Such attorneys-m-tact. Subject to the hmdat~ons set Iodh in their respedwe c~rt~tfjtes Of authordy, lhall have lurl power to bnd the C. zN~pany by their S~lnature and execution ol any such instruments and to attach the teal Of the Company thereto The Pres~ent ix any V~ce Pres~ent ix the Board Of Detectors may at any time revoke all power and authdx~ty ptev~ously I~ven to any attorney-in.feel." Th~$ Power ol Attune)- t$ S~lned and sailed by facsimile under and h the authority OI the kmow~nI ResolutiOn adopied by the Board ol D~rectors o~ the Company at I matt,hi duly ellled and held on the ~ ]th day of I~vember. · 'Re~ved. that the S~inature Ot the President Of a VN:e President and the seal of the ComNn}, may be sl'hxed by facsimile of altOf nay Iraneed pursuant to ,~'.ct~t 20I ArtKit Yl ol the ey-Laws. and the S~lmlture of the ,~retary MiI OI the Cd:,mpany may be affixed by lasc~mde to any cedars.ate of any ~uch power. and any Ix)wet N certif,'.ale bearmI SuCh facs~mde S~lnalures and seal shall be valid and bmdmI o8 The Company Any Such power $o executed and Maled and cedif,ed b/ceddK. lte so execuled end sealed shall. wtth resI)ed to any bc~ or untiedakinI to wh~..h ~ as attached. COntinue Io be valid and bend~nl: Oh the Cornpanl~.'  AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVAHIA co~,~y ,t cook t ss 'f J. E. Pureell V~Ce President. On th,S 6th ~y ot September J. E Purrell. to me known. who. be~n m~ du sworn. did dense and s.I: that he res~es m the Vmltal~ 0t Glenv,~w. State ol Ilhno~$ thit he IS rostrumant. that he knows the sell OI MK] Corlx)rat~On; that the seal aftlied to the Sd~d rostrumant ~ SUCh corporate Sail. that mt wit $o affi.ed h pursuant to 8ut orlly even by the Board O~ O~rectors of Mid corporation and that he Stained h~$ Mm¢ thereto pursuant to like authordy. arid 8cknowledee$ Same to the act and deed Of Said cofl:~rat~on. CER~FICATE · C. C)¢mp~ DIary PublK;. H,y CornmlsstoLh; Expires HouSe;' 12, ]990' I, George R. Hobsugh. Assistant Secretart Of AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, P~NNSYLVANIA, do cedlht that the POwer of Attorney heroin above set fodh Is still in force. Ind lulher certify that Section 2 of Article V1 of the By-Laws of the Company an~ the Resolution ol the BoNd of Directors, let lodh In Mid Power Ot Attorney affixed the ml of the leld Cixttp~ny thle 11 dr/ BOND NO. 11133152287 - PREMIUM INCLUDED IN FP CD'Y OF T~CUL~ PA1LKIAND/LANDSCAPE WARRANTY BOND WH ~--k.EAS, the City of Temecula, State of California (heremafter designated as "City"), KAUFMAN AND BROAD and OF SAN DIEGO, INC. (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement whereby Principal agTeea to install and complete certain designated Parkland Impr6vementa, which said Agreement, dated 19 ., and identified as STERLING RANCH Project TRACT 23125-1 , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WI4~REAS, Principal is m,,quixed to warranty the work done under the terms of the Agreement for a period of one (1) year following acceptance thereof by City against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished, in the mount of ten pement (10%) Of the estimated cost Of the improvements; AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PA. AND THE NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and~M~RTCAN INSURANCE CO ,as surety, are held and fLrmly bound unto the City of Temecula, Ca]ifo,mia, in the penal sum of $ ~ 9 ,n0rLn~ , lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administnttors, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if the above- bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, SUCCeSSOrs, or assigns shall in aJ.[ things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therehi provided, on his or their part, to be kept and perfomed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to his or their nine intent and m~n~ng, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this 1 obligation shall bc and remain in full force and effect. As a pan of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attomcy's fees, incurred by City in successfully cnforcing such obligation, all to be taxed ~s costs and included in any judgemerit rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agr~s that no change, extension of time, a/teration or addition to the terms of the Agrecmcnt or to the work to bc performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the sarnc shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the A~'eement or to the work or to the specifications. 4 IN WITNESS WIq'gREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on OCTOBER 11 , 19 94. (Seal) (S~l) AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY SI. IRB'TY :OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA PRINCIPAL: KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SAN DIEGO, INC. LIABILITY LIMIT: $9,500.00 By: ' ~/~'~. ~-. A,_~/.'Y(~Z,-¢ By:. ATTORNEY-IN-FACT State of CALIFORNIA Gl. unly of SAN DIEGO On 10/14/94 DATE before me, PAMELA J. AR.AGON FULBRIGHT and WILLIAM R. CARDON known to me ~ OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized personally appeared JOHN W. ,/~lC~'ersonally CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL(S) ~CORPORATE Vice Preside Preslc~ent OFFICER(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] A'I'rORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: ~M,t Notch, ~c{~ ~ orjhe entity upon h~ alf ofwhich the person(s) SIGNER IS REPRESE~ING: THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document MUST BE A~ACHED TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above it .CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS A~NGELES OR 10/11/94 DATE personally appeared before me, BETTY WALKER, NOTARY PUBLIC JEAN L. WILLCOX NAME(S) OF SiGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(ix) whose name(s) is/a~e subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that ~be/she/t~e~c executed the same in ~&s/her/L4a~ authorized capacity~6), and that by ~z~6/her/h~iz signaturep~) on the instrument the person(f), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~ acted, executed the instrument. COMM, #1003839 LOS ANG L[S COUINTY NOTARY PUSUS-CAL FONffiA My C~m. Exo~r,.s Sept 20. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT Tm.E(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATFORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave.. P0. BOx 7184 · Canoga Pare. CA 91309-7184 THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ...... JFJ,q L. WILLCOX ...... and to bbsd the Corporatim thacb as ful~/and to the tame extent as If n.,ds bo~d: wes.~ by the ~fesfdmt.._t.d witis the axporste seal TMs p~o~att~r~e~/~r~n~p~m~an~A~V~.~m~nd4~B~.~a~THE/d~tJ~~~~~ dTe=t. A~erk,7~-im-fedle~1~teatudodl~udemhek&lfefd,.-Coq.; tudAl~alstoMee~k. lall~x~ms~lmdteq,~h,rudeek. k~lfelthe AMERICAN II',ISUIt,ANC8 COMPANY ~ OF CALIFOP. NLA m. COUNI'f OF M. AJ~.IN Onl~s ISC ~yof June . t9 ~0 ,kforeme~ ~ R.D. Farnswoah . ~ mc k~, who, ~q by me d~y ~o~, ~d ~ sad uy: thai ~ ~ V~-Prui~t of THE ~l~ INSU~ ~MP~Y, 1~ Coastion ~ ~ ~ ~ u~t~ ~ a~ b~nt; that ~ k~M ~ ~ of ~ ~ldon: ~al I~ ~ afrm~ to Ih ~d I~t ~ ~ ~rale ~; ,k~ h FJ M a~ by ~ of ~ ~ of ~ of ~ ~ra~n ~d ~t ~ s~ ~ am ~o ~ ~e ~d~. ~ W~ WHERE I ha~ k~nto ~ my h~d and a~ my o~ ~. ~ ~y t~ y~.~ r~a s~c w~tn, OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC,CALIFORNIA Prlncllai O~e b Marie Mf (emmh~?M h~m~&4. It ST/~OFCAIJFORNXA ¢:X~OFIk4ARIN I UgSmd~,P. u4~knt AsSlstant Seaetary Of THE A.~,!XR IC. A.N INSUR.AN~COMPANY, i NEBRA~KA C~rix~rstkm, DO HEP..EBY C1~KTIF'Y th~I ~fotego4 ~ndanacha:~P~WER~FATT~RNEYremsJns~fu~r~zar~dh~n~tbeg~rev~ked~a~rfbam~xe~t~~4~ !y4a,~l. of tn~ Corporadon, ~sd t~ II. uolu'joo of t~ Bo~d or Dl:on~0~ m forth tn Ik Powu o~f Anot~'-~ ttt mow in ~ss~dms~lRak(latt~Co~nr~ofMazla. Datedtht, ] '[ (layof t'lr-t'nl-,~.y' 19 ~s~'YII-TA4-90 (REV) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT County of LOS ANGELES On 10/11/94 DA'rS personal)y appeared [] personally known to me before me, BETTY WALKER. NOTARY PUBLTC JEAN L. WILLCOX NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persongs) whose name(s.) is/a;r.a subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that ~e/she/t~ executed the same in ~qci~/her/t~m~r authorized capacity~e.s), and that by x'~bs/her/tt~e~ signature(.4i) on the instrument the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. · ~ BETTY WALKER S ;4~,~. NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA : ~: · ~ LOS ANGELES CQUN~ My ~m. Exmr5 Sept. ZO, 1997 SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL, Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF All'ACHED DOCUMENT [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT Tm.E(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATtORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRuSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT --SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTTTY(IES) - A,,',,fFRICAN CASUALTY COMBAZfZ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE OF R~ADTNG, PENNSYLVANTA 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet AVe., P.O. BOx 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Ot Rel~dlng, P®nnsylvlnll CNA All ~ C~4~ mltmcnl~ You lialxe* '~lcel/Chk~F~, Illinois# POWER OF'ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT lietow All Men bl these Presents, TIll AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA, a co~l~rat~ dulX o/lamzod ar, U exisl~nI under the lift, 1~ the Commo~weallh o~ Penns3/Naml. en~ hewnI dl prmC~NI Oileel m the Cdy ol Cl~cl . and StaleOItllin~S. does hereby n'~ki. constiutiandlppomt Jean L, Ifillcox, Wesley R, Downey, Pamela L. ~.~°acobs, Larry G. 0'Donna11, Individually d Los Angeles, California ~S tru¢ end ~ul Att~ney.m*F~t with lull Ix~wer and authority here~ conferred to s~n, Hal and exKutS md$ be~ff tx~nd$. undedikst~ls end other o~latorl inStrumentS ~ s.~br Mt~e - In Unlimited Amounts - and to bnd AMERICAN CA$UALTY COMPANY OF READING. F~NNSY],VA/iIA thereby Is fuR7 and to the I,tm¢ extent as if such inStrumentS were telned ~ the duly authorized Offt,,IrS O~ AMERICAN CA~UAL~Y COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA and aft the acts ¢~ g~l AriDthe),, pursuant tO the authority hereby liven are hereby ritifi~ and confirmed. l'h~s Power ol Attorney :S ff~de and IzKufed Pursuant to and h authority of the Ioilow~nl By. Law ~uh/adopted by the Board of the, Company: "Atllcle Vl- [:ecullon ol Obfilallon. s Ind Appolnlmanl of Alluney.ln.Ficl $~dson 2 A~pomtment of Altotnr/.m.faCt. The Pres,denl or V~ce President may. Ir~ time to hme. splx)~nl by wdtten cedilt, afes atlotnexso in-tad to act m bahaft ol the CIXnpInI m the ezecut,on of 1~4~c,es of insurance. Ix)~ds, U~dikinls and other ol~ilitory rostrumnil Of like nature ~h attorneys.m-lad. $ul~lld Io the hmitateonS Set hxlh m these respedwe c~daff,~tis ol aulhor~ly, shall IMve fu~ power to b~nd the Comp,tny t)y Ihe,, s~lqture and ezecut,o~ ol iny Such inStrumentS and lo Sttich the ~al Ol the Ceml~ny thereto. The President ~t any Vice Present or the Board of D~redots may it any tlm¢ revoke e~ power and authority ptevioq$1y Irven Io Iny atlo~ney. in,fact." Th~$ POwer Of Attorney rl silted end Sealed I~f flcslm~l/under and h the authority OI the 10Bowstel Resolut~n Idopted by D,recto~s G4 Ihe C~mpany at e rn~et,nl dul,/elftool and held on the llth day of November. ]966: 'Resolved. that the S,i~turl (~ Ihe President o~ a V~e Pres~<~enl end the sell ol Ihe Coml~ny may be I~szed b3t facsimile off any power ol attorney ranled pursuant to ,~,d,on 20I Article VIOI the By. Laws. end the Silr~lluri OI Ihe ,e~Kratarlr Ot an ASSiStant ,e~ecrelar,/Ind the ~!1101 the ~'x~pany truly be seized h fasc~m,le Io any cedeft..Ite ~ I~y Such power, end a~y power 0t cerlffic,Ite bearre{ suc-h S~lnilure$ end seal Shift be VIIN~ and b,ndmI On the CO~t~!Nny Any Such power $o exKuted IrKI $~lle¢~ and cad,had h cerhf~cate 10 execute~ and f~eltd shaft. wdh reslx%l to any ~ Ot undidakinI to whf, h ~t ~t attached. cB~tinv¢ tO be valKI and h m . State Of IlhnOiS t ~ AMERICAN CASUALLY' COMPANY OF READING. PENNSYLVANIA J. E, Puffell Vtce PresSinS, On lh,, 6th dey o~ September .19 90 '. before me J. E Purlell. to me known. who. bee n~ tJu $w0~n. I:1~ depose Ind M · thai he resides m lhe V~lble 01 Gtenwew, State of IIl~m~s lh~l he mstrun~nt. thlt he knows the sell OI M~ C~l~rit~o~: that the sell Ifilll~ 10 the sei(I mstrgmenl il Such COrporate seal. Ihat d was I0 eft~xeo putsulna Io Iutho~dy ~ven I:rf the I~ard O~ D~rector$ ol fiKI {~rpotel~oA Ind that ha s~lned h~ nim~ thereto purSgenl tO like lulhorlly, end lcknowledles $.lmt tO I1~ the eel ind deecl OII, IK~ cofporlt~. CERTIFICATE Hy Commlsslon~xptres Hov~ecr 12, 1990' I, George R. Hobough, AsSIs Ent ~ecte I/y Of AMERICAH CASUALTY CX~MPANY OF READING, P~NNSYLVANIA, ¢~o oldif,/thai Ihe Powlf of Attorney h~tein above tel fodh la Itlll In fotct, I~d lulher Certify Skit ~fion 2 ol Atllcli V1 of the Byi. lws of the Company end the RelOlulio,1 Of the BoNd o! Directo~o, let forlh In uld Powlf at Attorney NI Itlll In fotcl. In lasSituDe), whofiDe I hevl hereunlo lubs~ribe<l ~ nlme 8n~ 8fflxed lhe HII Of the lead Complny thll ~11 dr/of October .lg 9Zl, CITY OF TENIECULA PARKLA~) / LANDSCAPE INEPROVENfE~"F AGREENS~"F DATE OF AGI~ ~,~NfENT: December 7, 1993 NAMiE OF SUBDIVIDER: NAME OF SUBDMSION: Kaufman-and Broad of San Diego, inc. Cleferred m as "SUBDIVIDER") Sterling R~nch (California Tradewinds) (Referred m as 'SUBDIVIDER") TRACTNO.: 23125-1 TENTATIVE MAP RKqOLUTiON OF APPROVAL NO.: (Referred to as "Resolution of Approval") PARKLAND rlVfPROVEMENT PLANS NO.: CRcfcrmd to as "Resolution of Approval") ESTI~A'i'b~D TOTAL COST OF PARKlAND I~PROVENIF__NTS: $ 190,000 COIVIPLETION DAT~: 6-95 NAlV[E OF SUI~i f AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND: 7 The American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania # 1376499021 American Insurance Company # 11133152287 NA/vEE OF SURelY AND BOND NO. FOR FAITIIFUL PBRFORNIANCE BOND: Same as Labor and Materials as shown above NAME OF SURETY AND BOND N0. FOR WARRANTY BOND: Same as Labor and Materials as shown above Tbd. s A~o'reement i~ made and entered into by and between the City, of Temecula, California, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Calffomi~, hereinafmr referred to as CITY, and the SUBDIVIDER. RECITALS A. SUBDIVIDER has pmsentexl to L~tl-Y for approval and rccordation, a final subdivision map of a pmpose~l subdivision pursnant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the ffiing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the ftling, approval and recordation of subdivision maps axe collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Subdivision Laws., B. A tentazive map of the SLrBDMSION has been approve, d, subject to the ' Subdivision Laws and to th~ requiremenu and conditions comtalned in the Resolution of Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is incoxpomted into this Agreement by refemnce. C. SUBDIVIDER is required as a condition of the approval of the tentative map that the Pa.~k-l~nd Improvement plans must be completed, in compliance with City standards, by the Completion Date. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a final map, that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a seeurexl Agreement with the CITY to complete the Paxkland/Landscape Improvement Plans within the Completion Date. D. In consideration of approval of a 3Hnal map for the SUBDIVISION by the City Council, SUBDIVIDER desire~ to enter into thix Agreement, whereby promises to install and - complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the ParlctandfL~ndseape Improvement work required by City in connection with propos~ subdivision. Subdivider has secured this ag-reement by Paxklandfl~ndscaping improvement Security requixed by the Subdivision Laws and approved by the City Attorney. The term 'Parkland" includes landscape m intended to be maintained by the T._emecuh Community Services Disuict. E. Complete Pailand/L,~nds:ape Improvement pl~n~ forthe consu'uction, in~ll~tlon and completion of the l~arld,nd Improvements have ~ pr:parod by SUBDIVIDI~. and appmved by the Director of Community Services. The Parkland Improvement Plans numberr. d as referenced previously in this Agreement ar~ on f~e in the Office of the Director of Community Services and ar~ incorporated into this Agn~ment by thi~ reference. All references in this A~'eement to the ParlcJ~nd Improvement Plans shall include ~femnce to any spe~i~'i~ons for the Improvements as approved by the Director of Community Services. F. An estiznate of the cost for consu'uction of the Parklandlmprovements according -to the Improvement Plans has been made and approved by the Director of Community Services. The estimated mount is st2md on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit 'A' to this Ag'm~ment. G. The clrx' has adopted standards for the consumction and installation of Parldand/!~ndscape Improvements within the LLII X'. The ParklanctFr~ndscape Improvement Plans have be~n pr,rpared in conformance with the CITY standards, (in effea on the date of approval of the l~solution of Approval). H. SUBDIVIDER r~cogniz~s that by approval of the final map for SUBDMSION, CITY has conferrr. d substantial rights upon SUBDIVIDE! including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has token the final act necessary to subdivide the property within the SUBDrVISION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the Parid~nd/l.2ndscape Improvemen~ by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform its obli~tions under the, Agr~ment, incl~dinJ, but not lirnit~t to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation to complete construction of Parkland/Landscape Improvements by the Completion Date. CITY encumbrances for the SUBDIVIDER'S obligations with regard to acquisition by CITY of off-site rights-~of-way, easements and other interesu in real property. shall be subject to a sepante A,Tr~ment betw~n SUBDIVIDER and ClTY. 2. Acauisifion and Dedication of Easements or Pd. ghts-of-Wav. If any of the Parkland/r andscape Improvements and land development work contemplated by this Ag'mement are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced before: a. The offer of dedication to t:i l Y or appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interest in r~l property, and appropriate authorization from the property owner to allow construction or insmltntion-of the Improvements or -work, or b. The dedication to, and acc~'ptance by, the CITY of appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interests in ~ property, and approved by the D~panment of Pub].ic World, as determined by the DLr~ctor of Community Services. c. The issuance by a court of comp~tem jurisdiction pursuant to the State Eminent Domain Law of an order of possession. SUBDIVIDF_R shall comply in all n'~spects with order of possession. Nothing in this Section 2 shall b~ consn'ued as authorizing or granting an extension of time to SUBDIVIDER. 3. Security. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times guarant~ SUBDrVIDER'S performance of this Ag~ment by furnishing to ~l~. f, and maintaining, good and sufficient s~curk7 as r~quin~d by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by tltll Y' for the purposes and in the mounts as follows: a. to a~sur~ faith.f-u[ p~rformanc~ of this A~oT~ment in re~ard to n~d improvemenr~ ~ ~d mount of l~ of ~ esma~ cos~ of ~ ~~~ ~p~v~m~nE; Ed b. to s~u~ pa~en~ w ~y connctor, subconnctor, pe~ons ~n~ ~uipment, or ~g ~r m~e~ for P~ ~nds~pe ~provements ~u~ to ~ cons~ct~ or ~ pungent to ~ A~ment ~ the addi~on~ mount of 50 % of ~e ema~ cost of ~e ~pmvemenm; ~d c. to pm~ or wm~ ~e wo~ done pummt to ~s A~ment for a pehod of one y~ fo~ow~g ac~mce ~mf by ~' agmst my deftfive work or ~bor done or deftfive mate~lg fimsh~ ~ the addi~on~ mount of 10% of ~e emat~ co~ of the ~nd ~pmvemenm. ~e s~u~des ~u~ by tMs A~ment sh~ be k~t on file wi~ the Ci~ Clerk. ~e tens of the s~u~ty d~umenu mfemnc~ on h~e 1 of t~s A~ment ~ ~co~omt~ into ~s A~ment by t~s Reference. ~ ~y s~u~ty is ~lac~ by ~other a~mv~ s~u~ty, ~e replacement sh~ be film with the Ci~ Clerk ~d, u~n f~g, sh~ be d~m~ to have b~n made apm of~d~co~mt~to th~A~ment. Upon f~g ofa~lacement s~ufi~ wi~ the Ci~ Clerk, ~e foner s~u~ may be ml~. 4. ~temtions to ~d Impmvement Plus. a. ~y ch~es, ~temdons or ad~fions to ~e P~ds~pe ~pmvement P~s ~d ~il~ons or to ~e ~pmvemenm, not exce~g 10 % of ~e o~ emat~ cost ~ ~e ~pwvement, w~ch m mummy a~ upon by ~e cl'l'f ~d S~D~, sh~ not m~eve ~e ~pmvement s~ufi~ ~ven for f~l peffomn~ of ~s A~ment. h ~e event such ch~ges, ~temtions, or ad~tions exc~ 10% of the o~ esmat~ cost of ~e improvement, SUBDIVIDER shall provide improvement security for falfiful performance as required by Paragraph 5 of this Agxt~mem for 100% of th~ to~l esmnatexl co~ o~the improvement as c~.__-gexl, almrezt, or amended, minus any complemd partial ml~ses allowed by Paragraph 6 of tbi~ Agr~emenL b. The SU~DI'V'~]~ ,~h~|J COlJ$1:rlJCt [h~ Parkl~nd Improvemenu in accordanc~ with the ~ f Standards in effect at the time of adoption of the Resolution of AlYpwval. c~ f r~_~rves the right to modify the standards applicable to the SUBDIVISION and this Agn~ement, when necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare or comply with applicable State or federal law or Cl'l'Y zoning ordinances. If SUBDIVIDKR requests and is granted an extension of time for completion of the improvements, cfrf may apply the standards in effect at the time of the extension. Inspection and Maintenance Period. a. SUBDIVIDER shall obtain City inspection of the Parkland/T ~ndscape Improvements in accordance with the City standards/n effect at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDiVIDER shall at all times malvt~n proper faceties and safe access for inspection of the Parkland Improvements by CiTY inspecton and to the shops wherein any work Ls in props.ration. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may request a final inspection by the Director of Community Services, or the Dixector of Community Service's authorized r~resentative. If the Director of Community Services, or the designated r~presentative, determine that the work has been completed in accordance with this Agreement, then the Dix~ctor of Community Services shall certify the completion of the Parkhnd/r ~ndscape Improvements to th~ Board of Dimaors. b. SD'BDIVIDER shall continue to mmr~li~ the l~rkj~ndFr~ndsc~pe Imprvvemenr. s for n~n~ry (90) cLlys l~c~ they b.~ve b~:B c~l'~ed complete. No improvements shah b~ f~n~lly ac, c~pt~ urLle,~s the mainmnance period has exph'~i, and all as-peas of the work have been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance with the Parkl~nd/T~ndscape Improvement Plans and ~l i f standards. certification. Release of Securities. SUBDIVIDER shall be~r all costs of inspection and Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the Community Services District of the cri'f, the securities required by this A~oTccment shall be released as follows: a. Security given for faithful performance of any act, obligation, work or A~o~mement shall be released upon the expiration of the maintenance period and the final completion and acceptance of the act or work, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) hereof. b. The Dh'~ctor of Community, Services may r~lease a portion of the security given for faith/ul performance of improvement work as the Parkland Improvement pro~nr, sses upon application themfor~ by the SUBDIVIDER; provided, however, thax no such release shall be for an mount less that 25 % of the total Par~l~nd improvement Security given for faithful performance of the improvement work and that the securit7 shah not be reduced to an mount less th~n 50 % of the total ~C-~ndscape/Parkhnd Improvement Security given for faithful performance until expiration of the mmtenance period and :final completion and acceptance of the improvement work. In no event shall the Director of Community Services authorize a release of the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Security which would reduce such secCz'rity to an amount below that required to guannt~e the completion of the improvement work and any other obLi,zation imposed by this Agreement. c. Security given to s~cur~ payment to the conLractor, his or her subcontractors and to persons furnishing labor, materials or e~luipment shall, six months after the completion and acceptance of the work, be r~duced to an amount ~luat to the total cl~irned by all claimants for whom.lien have be~n fried and of which notice has besn given to the legislative body, plus an amount r~asonably det~rmine~cl by the Director of Community Services to be requir~ to assur~ the performance of any other obli~-afions secured by the Security. The balance of the security shall be r~l~ased upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for which the security was given. d. No security given for the ~rantee cr warranty of work shall be r~leased until the expiration of the warranty period and until any claims fried during the warranty !~riod have be~n settled. As provided in pam~o-r~lph 10, the warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance of all work and improvements by the City Council. e. The CTrY may r~t~in from any security r~leas~ci, and amount sufficient to cover costs and r~asonable expenses and f~s, including r~asonable attorneys' fees. Injury to Public Improvements, Public ProDertw or Public Utilities FacLliti-.s. SUBDIVIDE3K shall r=plac~ or have rcphc~, or r~pair or have r~paimd, as the case may b~, all public improvemenu, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which am destroyed or damaged or d~,vyed by reason of any work done under this A~m'c~ment. SUBDIVIDt~ shall bc,~r the entire cost of rcplscment or r~pain of any and all public property on public utility property d~maged or destroyed by reason of any work don:. Under this a~e-~ment whether such pmpexty is owned by the United Stares or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or private utility corpontion or by any combination or such owners. Any r~pair or r~placement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the appmv~l, of the City Engin~r. g. Permits. SLrBDrVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDF_R."S expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction ~nd installation of the improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all f~s and taxes mqui.md by law. 9. Default of SUBDIVIDER. a. Default of SUBDIVIDER sh~ll include, but not be limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S failur~ to timely commence construction pursuant to this Ag-rv.~ment; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the Pa.rkland/T ~,~dscape Improvements; SUBDIViDER'S failure to timely cure any defect in the l:~rkland/I~ndscape Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to pc-from substantial consuuction work for a period of 20 calend~.r days after commencement of the work; SLrBDIViDEI~.'S insolvency, appointment of a r~ceiver, or the fjBng of any. petition in banicruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within ~ (30) days; the commencement of a fomolosurc action a~finst the SUBDM SION or z portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or SUBD1W'IDER's failure to perform any other obligation under this.Agreement. b. The CITY reserves to itself all minedies avai~ble to it at law or in equity for br=ach of SUBDIVIDER's obligations under this A~'~ement. The i&l'l I' shall have the fight, subject to this section, to draw upon or utiliT,- the appropriate security to mitigat~ oily damages in event of default by SUBDIVIDEtL The right of C~ITY to draw upon or ufil{~e the security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy av~H~bte to C1YY. It is specifically recogniz~ that the estimated costs and security mounts may not reflect the actual cost of construction or inst~|l~tjon. of Parkland/Landscape Improvements and, therefore, CiTY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion of the Paxldand/l~ndscape Improvements in accordance with the Ps. rldand/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications contained herein. In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this Agrr~ment, SUBDIViDER authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after m~ng w~nen notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBD1VIDER'S Surety, and a~'ees to pay the ent. ixe cost of such performance by ~li f. ~jl'J.'Y may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDi'VIDER'S Surety shall be liable to crfY for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event, CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and vt{l~,e in completing the work, such mat~ais, appliances, plant and other prop-_ny belon_.o-ing to SUBDIVID]aR as may be on the site of the work and necessa,D, for pe~orman~ce of the work. c. !~ailum of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Agn~ment Sb~ll constitute consent to the filing by tsn f of a notice of violation against all the lots in the SUBDIVISION, or to mcind the approval or otherwise revert the SUBDM SION to acreage. The romeely provided by this Subsection C is in addition to and not in lieu of other minedies available to CITY. SUBDIVIDER a~rccs that the choice of mmexiy or minedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion of clrf. d. In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation hemunder, SUBDIVIDER a~,~r~cs to pay z/1 costs and expenses incurred by CITY in securing performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney' s fees. e. The failur= of CrrY' to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to decla~ a broach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or broach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDrVIDER. 10. Wa.rrantw. SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this A~rccment for a period of one year after cxpiratlon of the maintenance period and final acceptance by the City Council of the work and improvements a~a/nst any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished. Where Parkland/T n.dscape Improvements an to be constructed in phases or s~tions, the one year wan'znty period shall commence after City acceptance of the last completed hnprovemcnt. If within the warranty period any work or improvement or part of any work or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or caused to b~ done, furnished, installed or consn'ucted by SUBDIVIDER fails m fulffd any of thc re, quLrements of this Agn~m ent or the Parklan cLq -~ndscape Improvement Plans and specifications referred to herein, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, rapair or raplace or rt~onstruct any defective or othenvise unsatisfactory pan or pans of the work or structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to as promptly or in accordance with this requirement, SUBDIVIDF...R hereby authorizes ~li f, at Cxi f option, to peffom the work twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and agrees to pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should cxl Y' determine that an urgency requires repairs or replacements to be made befor~ SUBIDIVIDF_P, can be notified, ufl f may, in its sole discretion, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER shall pay to ul'fY' the cost of such repairs. 11. SUBDIVIDER Not A~ent of t:lrf. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contnctors am or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIViDER'S obligations under this Agreement. 12. Injury to Work. Until such time as the Parkland/Landscape Improvements are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Ag'mement prior to the completion and acceptance of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and axe hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER. 13. Other Atzre~,ments. Notking contained in thin A_m~ement shall preclude CITY from expendLug monies pursuant to ag~mements concurrently or previously executed between the parties, or from entering into ag-reement with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs of wamr and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuam w the provisions of the Cfi Y ordinances providing therefor, nor shall anything in this A~reement commit CITY to any such apportionment. _ 14. SUBDIVIDER'S 0blintion to Warn Public Durin~ Construction. Until final acceptance of the Pa,14e'l~and Improvements, SUBDIVIDI~:R shall give good and adequate warning to the public o.f each and every dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will rake all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition. 15. Vestin~ of Ownership. Upon acceptance of work on behalf of {.;ITY and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the impn3vements constructed pursuant to this Ag'r~ement shall vest in CITY. 16. Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be made by the City Council upon recommendation of the Dixector of Communjty Services after fmaj completion and inspcction of all Parkland/Landscape improvements. The Board of Dh-ectors shall act upon the DLmctor of Community Services recommendations within thirty (30) days from the date the Director of Community Services certifies that the work has finally completed, as provided in Para.rraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects b y- CITY. 17. indemnity/l--Iold Fl~a-mless. L:ITY or any officer or employee the~of shall not be liable for any injury to persons or property oc~ioned by mason of the acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDF~., its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement. SUBDrVIDER further a~x~s to protect and hold ha.n~ess ~li f, its officials and employees from any and all claims, demand, causes of action, liability or loss of any son, because of, or arising out of, acts or omiTsions or SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employ~s in the performance of tki~ Agreement, including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in pare, the design or construction of the Parkland/T ~udsc~pe Improvem-.nts. Tnis mdemniT~cafion and A__~reernent to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages or taking of prop-.rty r~sutting from the design or cons'nuclion of the ParklandYLandscap-. Improvemenu as provided heroin, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets and other public improvemenu. Acceptance of any of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements shall not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any r~nsibility for any damage or taking covered by this para=~r'aph. u.l'l'f shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements pumuant to the appmved Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans, unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written objection by SUBDFVLDER submitted to the Director of Community Services before approval of the particular improvement desi=~n, which objection indicated that the particular improvement design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After acceptance of the Parkland/Landscape improvements, the SUBDIV'iI)ER shall remain obligated to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction defect, however, SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. 'Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by the CITY of Parkland/l~ndscape Improvements. It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for all liability for design and construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements installed or work done pursuant to this Agreement and that CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfe~nce, mi-~feasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or contaction. The improvement security shall not be required to cover the provision of this pm__~raph. 18. Sale or Disposition Of SUBDMSION. Sale or other disposition of this propert), will not relieve SUBDIViDER from the obligations set forth_ heroin. If SUBDIVIDER sells the property or any portion of the property within the SUBDM SION to any other person, the SUBDIViDER may request a novaion of thi~ Agn~ment and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may x~quest a release or mtuc~on of the securities requix~l by thi~ Agr~ment. Nothing in the novafion shall relieve the SLTBDIVIDF_.R of the obligations under Paxagraph 17 for the work or improvement done by SUBDIVIDER. 19. 20. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of thi~ Agreement. Time for Completion of Work Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall complete June 1995 construction of the improvements required by this Agreement no later th~n In the event good cause exists ~s determined by the City Engineer, and if otherwise permitted under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the improvements hemunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the Director of Community Services. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety and shall not affect the validity of this Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for this Agreement. The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. Delay, other than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CzI~, or by an act of God, which SLrBDIVIDER could not tmve masonably foreseen, or by storm or inclement weather which prevents the conducting of work, or by sn'ikes, boycotts, similar actions by employees or labor organiTations, which prevent. the conducting or work, and which were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for an extension of time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the Director of Community Services may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security ~aaranteeing performance of this AgTe,~ment as exmnded in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as demrm~ned by the Dir,.ctor of Community Services. 21. No Vesting of Rights. Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this Agn'ccment shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any change in any change in any zoning or building law or ordinance. 22. NOtices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is fried with the 'City: Notice to CII f: City Clerk City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, C~nfomia 92390 Notice to SUBDIVIDER: Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, inc. 12626 High Bluff Drive #400 San Diego, CA 92130 23. Sevembilitw. The provisions of this A~o~n~ment am severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invfdd by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agn~ment shall remain in full force and effect unless mended or modified by the mutual consent of the parries. 24. Cap~0ns. The captions of this Agreement are for convenience and reference- only and shall not d~fmc, explain, modif'7, limit, exemplhty, or aid in the mmrpmmtion. construction or m~n½ng of any provisions of thh A~m~ment. -- 2_5. Litimfion or Arbitration. In the ev,mt that suit or afoitmfion i~ brought to enforce the terms of this contract, the pmv~illng parry shMJ bc cnfified to IkigaUon cons and r".asonablc attomey's fees. 26. Incomoration of Recitals. The r~;~k to this agreement m'= hereby incorporated into the terms of this agT~cmcnt. 27. Entire A~o-mement. This Agr=cment const/rates the cnnire Ag'mcment of the parries with respect to the subjca matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signexl by the appropriate representative of the parties. In the case of the crrY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. IN ~Vt lN'F. SS VcB,-~EOF, this A~reement is executed by Crl'Y, by and through its Mayor. By: Mayor (Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDER'S si~namr~ is required and shall be attached) ATTEST: By: June S. Greek City Clerk RBCOMlVr~-NDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Name: City Engineer By: Name: Director of Communi~ Services APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Scott F. Field City Altoracy STATE_ OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ~"~r", } persona,y appeared .3hi,, ~, Uj. ¢'~_1 ~,",'O k + '- LO~[:O.v-. ~Z n._~L,-~b~..persona,yknownto~.e (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. '~,.~~iie-Marie L. Dugr~ , Cornre. 110261~ ~ Fhls area for ~lcial nol/r~81 sear) Title of Document Date of Document Other signatures not acknowledged No. of Pages APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager November 15, 1994 Rancho California Sports Park Considerations Improvement Project Design California Sports Park Improvement Project as designed in accordance with the approved master plan and bid the skateboard facility as an add alternate bid. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 1994, the Board of Directors approved the master plan for improvements at the Rancho California Sports Park. These improvements include parking facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian circulation, picnicking facilities, a restroom/snack bar, roller hockey rink, skateboard facility, and lighting. The construction budget for this project is $1,250,000. Upon approval of the master plan, the design consultant, J.F. Davidson, began preparing construction drawings for the project. During the course of design development, the construction cost estimates increased due to lighting costs, which increased by approximately $143,000 and Metropolitan Water District's requirement of a concrete cap to protect their waterlines at a cost of $80,900. Therefore, the current budget estimate for this project, including a 10% contingency, is $1,473,900,a difference of $223,900. Staff has identified that the construction of the skateboard facility will cost approximately $225,000. Therefore, it is recommended that the skateboard facility be bid as an add alternate bid for the project. Based upon the outcome of the public bid process, a recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for final consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact in bidding the project with the skateboard facility as an add alternate. Once the bids are opened, if the lowest, responsible bid is consistent with the engineer's estimate, the Board of Directors will need to consider either appropriating more funds to the project or reducing the scope of the project to match the existing budget prior to awarding the construction contract. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on Tuesday, October 11, 1994, 8:42 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. AGENCY MEMBERS: PRESENT: 5 Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson, City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENT None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 13, 1994. 1.2 Approve the minutes of September 27, 1994. AGENCY BUSINESS Agency Member Stone announced he would abstain on Items 2, 3 and 4, due to a conflict of interest. RDAMIN/IOI11194 1 08/29194 RedeveloDment Aaencv Minutes 2. October 11,1994 Contract Amendment to Provide Visual linDact Analysis in the Old Town Redevelooment Project Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Agency Member Mu~oz asked if this is the first time a visual impact analysis has been requested on a project and what benefit will be gained. Planning Director Thornhill responded this is the first time the City has recommended a visual impact analysis. He explained the recommendation is based on the size of the project and to address the concerns of residents as to what Old Town will actually look like. Agency Member Mu~oz requested that staff investigate a photo simulation process under development at U.C. Berkeley for possible use in the Visual Impact Analysis for the Old Town Redevelopmerit project. Terese McLeod, 42200 Main Street, spoke in opposition to expending funds for this analysis. It was moved by Agency Member Roberrs, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Approve an amendment to the contract with Tom Dodson & Associates to add a visual analysis into the environmental Impact Report for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. 2.2 Increase the amount of the contract with Tom Dodson & Associates by $9,887.96. 2.3 Approve an amendment to the contract with Wimberly Allison Tong & Coo to perform additional building design services needed to support the visual impact analysis. 2.4 Increase the amount of the contract with Wimberly Allison Tong & Coo by $13,000. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs NOES: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Mu~oz ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone RDAMIN/IO/11194 2 08129194 RedeveloDment AGency Minutes October 11, 1994 Appropriation and Authorization to Release Fund for Old Town Soecific Plan Billboard SiQn Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report. Agency Member Mu~oz asked why Texaco was allowed to put their logo on the billboard designed to advertise Old Town, and asked if this is appropriate since funding has been received from the City. City Attorney Peter Thorson advised that whatever value the Texaco logo gains by inclusion on the sign, a proportional cost must be received from that business. He stated this kind of advertising may be approved as long as the company pays its fair share. Agency Member Roberts stated it is his understanding that costs for the billboard far exceeded the City's contribution. Michael A. Thesing, 30291 Via Brisa, spoke in favor of funding the billboard for Old Town and informed the Council that two signs are available at this time. He explained that Mr. Lou Kashmere of Texaco, has donated in excess of $6,000 toward rent on the billboard over the past 18 months. Agency Member Mu~oz stated it was his understanding that this sign should not promote any particular business. Mr. Thesing said if the City funds this project, the Texaco logo would be removed. It was moved by Agency Member Muffoz, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation with the understanding that the Texaco Star be removed as a permanent part of the sign. 3.1 Appropriate $20,000 from Redevelopment Agency Account No. 280-199- 999-5264. 3.2 Authorize payment of the Old Town Specific Plan Billboard Sign Lease for two billboards in an amount not to exceed $20,000. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone RDAMIN/10/11194 3 08/29194 Redevelooment Aaencv Minutes member committee. The motion was carried by the following vote: October 11.1994 AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Roberrs, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn at 9:45 P.M. to a meeting on October 18, 1994, 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks City Clerk June S. Greek RDAMINIIO/11194 5 08/29/94 ITEM 2 CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members FRONt~_//~_. Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Authorization of Agreement for of Professional Consulting Services for Transportation and Traffic Engineering for T.Z.B.G., Inc. Project, Old Town Parking Study, RFP #30 PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~ John Pourkazemi, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopmerit Agency authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Robert Kahn, John I(ain & Associates, Inc. for a parking study in the amount of $20,420. Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Council as to final form. DISCUSSION: The scope of work for Robert Khan, John Kain & Associates, Inc. is described in the attached proposal. This parking study is required pursuant to the T.Z.B.G. Inc. (Zev Buffman) proposal for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. This authorization will bring the consultant services authorized to date to a total of $302,728, of which T.Z.B.G. Inc. is resl~onsible for one-half. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation of $20,420 is required for the parking study. Funds are available for the City's portion of the fees (one-half, not to exceed a total of $10,210). The balance will be billed to T.Z.B.G. Inc. Attachments: Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates Inc. proposal Old Town Redevelopment Project Schedules of Consultants -1- r:%e0drOt%94%l 115\rfp30.agnlej~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates Inc. proposal Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning · Traffic/Acoustical Engineering October 31, 1994 Mr. John Pourkazemi CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 Subject: Proposal for the City of Temecula "Old Town Parking Study" Dear Mr. Pourkazemi: INTRODUCTION Based upon your request, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. is pleased to modify our proposal to the CITY OF TEMECULA dated October 13, 1994 to delete the alternative finding mechanism study which was to be prepared by David Taussig & Associates. It is our understanding that you have selected ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC, to prepare the CITY OF TEMECULA "Old Town Parking Study" however at this time you would like to hold off on completing the full alternative financing mechanism study. SCOPE OF WORK The following Scope of Work has bee revised by ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for this study effort: Attend one (1) project kick-off meeting to discuss the project objectives, schedule and product and two additional progress meetings with staff during the course of the study. Review the project documentation with respect to previous work on City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan. Field review the Old Town Temecula area to determine existing parking demand at representative locations for both a peak typical peak weekday (Friday) and weekend (Saturday) conditions. Additionally, an inventory of existing on-street and off-street parking capacity will be made based upon the field review. 4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 474-0809 · FAX (714) 474-0902 Mr, John Pourkazemi CITY OF TEMECULA October 31, 1994 Page 2 Analyze and recommend an organized system of public parking within Old Town based on existing land use conditions, existing on and off street parking, the Old Town Specific Plan, and the proposed Old Town Redevelopment Project, Analyze the availability and estimated site development/acquisition cost of the alternative parking facilities as depicted on the Potential Parking Lot Locations of the Old Town Specific Plan (utilizing the appraisal information provided by the City). Analyze the aggregate parking requirements in conjunction with alternative modes of local transport, i.e. a shuttle service, to provide access in and around Old Town in accordance with the circulation element of the proposed Old Town Redevelopment Project, The analysis shall include specific parking requirements per each proposed facility in addition to evaluating shared parking opportunities with offsetting peak hour parking demands associated with differing land uses in the Old Town area. The study shall prepare and evaluate three alternative parking/local circulation "programs" to adequately serve the needs of the Old Town Redevelopment Project and the future development of the Old Town Specific Plan in aggregate, based on the "Public Off-Street Parking Plan", section V.D.7. of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan (see attached) for the City's consideration. Document the results of the study in a summary Old Town Parking Study report. 9. Respond to staff comments and revise report as necessary, 10. Attend up to three (3) public meetings (Planning Commission, Transportation Commission and City Council meeting) to discuss the Old Town Parking Study. It is our understanding that the alternative financing mechanism study will be accomplished at a later date. Mr. John Pourkazemi CITY OF TEMECULA October 31, 1994 Page 3 PROFESSIONAL FEES The fee for the work outlined in this proposal is based upon personnel charges plus direct expenses as indicated in the attached Exhibit A. The estimated fee for each major task and the total will be as follows: TASK 1. Project Initiation 2. Review Previous Studies 3. Field Reconnaissance 4. Analyze Parking 5. Analyze Site Costs 6. Analyze Parking Needs 7. Evaluate 3 Alternative Programs 8. Prepare Draft Study Report 9. Prepare Final Study Report 10. Public Meetings (3) Staff Fees Reproduction/Deliveries/Misc. TOTAL FEE fEE $1,710.00 ~ 540.00 $1,480.00 ~2,000.00 ~1,930.00 ~1,860.00 $2,430,00 $4,280.00 $1,360.00 $1,830.00 $19,420.00 ~1,000.00 -~20,420.00 Three copies (two bound and one original for the client's use) of the project report would be prepared. Monthly billings from ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. will be based upon the attached Exhibit A - BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.. The proposed fee does include attendance at three (3) public hearings/meetings, which may be required to secure approval of the project. If additional meetings are required and requested, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES,-tNC. would be Mr. John Pourkazemi CiTY OF TEMECULA October 31, 1994 Page 4 happy to attend these meetings and billing would be based upon the billing rates included in Exhibit A. The Client agrees to limit the Design Professional's liability to the Client and to all construction Contractors and Subcontractors on the project, due to the Design Professional's negligent acts, errors, or omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of the Design Professional to all those named shall not exceed 850,000 or the Design Professional's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. In the event that a lawsuit is brought for the enforcement of any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party should be entitled to attorney fees and costs in addition to any damages. TIME SCHEDULE It is estimated that the Old Town Parking Study will take approximately 30 working days to complete from the date of authorization, and date of receipt of data essential for the study. It is our understanding that the City council will be approving this proposal on November 15, 1994. Based upon that authorization date, it is estimated that the report would be completed by the end of December, 1994. You have indicated a desire to meet a December 15, 1994 deadline for submittal of the draft parking study. Due to the delay in the City of Temecula approval of the proposal, it may be very difficult to meet that time schedule given the complexity of this project. ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. will do everything possible to .complete the draft report in a timely schedule to meet your needs. Since we will be doing additional parking counts and there are a number of holidays during the November and December, any delays resulting from circumstances beyond our control, such as weather, may have to extend the time schedule. We would very much want to talk with staff at the initial kick-off meeting to discuss the timing of parking counts during the critical months of November and December. Mr. John Pourkazemi CITY OF TEMECULA October 31, 1994 Page 5 We are looking forward to serving you on this project. This proposal is valid for sixty days, if signed by the client. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (714) z~74-0809. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal RK:nad/4447 JN:518-94-002 Attachments CONTRACT APPROVAL: Approved by: Title: Firm: Date: CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT A BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Compensation for Services The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows: Position Principal Senior Associate Associate Senior Engineer/Planner Engineer/Planner Assistant Engineer/Planner Engineering Technician IV Engineering Technician III Engineering Technician II Engineering Technician I Administrative Assistant Administrative Aide Clerical Aide Hourly Rate $110.00 85.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 45.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 General (1) Reimbursable direct costs, such as reproduction, supplies, messenger service, long-distance telephone calls, travel and traffic counts will be billed at cost plus ten (10) percent. {2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work and public meetings, the above rates may be increased 50 percent. (3) Client payment for professional services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from other parties. (4) Billing statements for work wiil be submitted monthly. Statements are payable within thirty (30) days of the receipt by client of statement. Any statement unpaid after thirty (30) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law. January 1, 1992 lRoberkt Kahn, John Kain)~ Associotes, Inc. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Old Town Redevelopment Project Schedules of Consultants u-Oo ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV~~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 15, 1994 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider approval of an RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to Edward and Kathleen Dool DBA Dual Development Inc. DISCUSSION: The City has received a revised application from Dual Development, Inc., DBA Temecula Shuttle to construct a 1740 square foot building located at 41953 Main Street, Temecula, CA. The business is owned by Ed and Kathleen Dool who are currently in the process of purchasing the land at the above location. The Agency Members previously approved an RDA loan for Temecula Shuttle in the amount of $82,585on January 26, 1994for the purpose of purchasing equipment and a modular building. This loan did not fund because the borrower has been in the process of revising his business plan. The facility would feature: Temecula Shuttle Offices/lobby/ticket windows, public restrooms and day lockers, picnic/snack area, tour coach/wine tour loading/discharge area and rental office space. The public restrooms and facilities would be maintained by Temecula Shuttle. The Planning Department has reviewed the proposed facility for conformity with the Old Town Specific Plan. The site is located on the major east-west street in the heart of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) District of the Old Town Specific Plan. Based upon this review, the Planning Director has determined that if the majority of the uses (by floor area) are consistent with the Plan, then the proposed facility may be included as a subordinate or accessory use. The Council's approval of the proposed loan will not eliminate the need for the applicant to apply for, and obtain approval of, a Plot Plan prior to developing the site. It should be noted that the proposed project location falls within the Old Town Entertainment proposed area. Although the Temecula Shuttle may be a compatible use with the Old Town Entertainment Project, neither the entertainment project architects nor the project proponent (Zev Buffman) have reviewed the Temecula Shuttle proposal. The new construction loan amount is ~ 100,000 amortized over twenty years due in 5 years. This loan would be secured by a second trust deed on the subject property located at 41953 Main Street, Temecula, behind a senior lien in the amount of $74,000 carried by the seller. The loan would also be secured by an Assignment of Note secured by Deed of Trust owned by Mr. and Mrs, Dool on a parcel of land located in Wilmington, California. The appraisal of the Wilmington property was completed on November 4, 1994reflecting a value of 9370,000. This note is a seasoned note having had 52 monthIv payments. The assigned Note will be collected under terms of an installment collection contract at a financial institution acceptable to both the borrower and the City whereby the City will be notified in the event of any default of payment or payments in excess of scheduled payments. Title insurance policies will be required for both properties-the Temecula property located at 41953 Main Street and the vacant industrial property located in Wilmington. The proceeds of this loan will be handled by a fund control agent to ensure proper funding with periodical inspections for payments of materials and lien releases. In connection with the revised plan, Mr. Pool is requesting the following exceptions: NOT RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: 1) Because his original loan request was granted using the 26-week T-Bill index, he is requesting this loan be granted using the same index rather than Prime + 2%. Council is restrained from granting the request under the terms of the stipulated judgement. (The revised judgement authorizing a rate of Prime + 1% has not yet been authorized). STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL CONSIDER: 2) The City grant a 6-month loan payment and fee grace period during construction. Interest would accrue but payments would not begin until 6 months from date of note or upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy--whichever occurs first. 3) If the Wilmington property note is paid off, Temecula Shuttle may pay off the balance of the first trust deed on the Temecula property. The City's second position would then become a first position and the Assignment on the Wilmington note would no longer be required. This would be acceptable subject to a new appraisal paid for by Edward and Kathleen Doolo 4) If the Temecula shuttle project proceeds without incorporation into the planning efforts underway for the Old Town Entertainment Project, conflicts could occur which could jeopardize the success of both projects. 5) The Council may wish to approve the loan application contingent on the incorporation of the Temecula Shuttle in the Old Town Entertainment Project. If the Council desires to accept this option, staff should be directed to initiate negotiations immediately with representatives of Dual Development and T.Z.B.G., Inc. 6) The loan note and agreement may provide that the Dools receive any such lower interest rate as may be determined by modification to the stipulated settlement of the Redevelopment Agency litigation. Mr. Dool's representative has provided other language concerning the Old Town Entertainment Project (see attached correspondence). However, the City's consultant recommends the language provided in Items four and five. Mr. E)ool contends his project will improve the City of Temecula by providing a transportation information center and the construction and maintenance of public restrooms and day lockers. This loan has been reviewed by our independent loan committee consisting of a local bank official and a Certified Public Accountant. Approval is recommended subject to the stated stipulations. FISCAL IMPACT: To date the City has funded 9109,400 in Redevelopment loans. AI'FACHMENT: Correspondence from Markham & Associates dated November 7, 1994. P:\SYERSK\SHUTTLE.AGN i MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES November 7, 1994 De~l~a~,ntConsultsn~ Mary Jane icLarney, Assistant City Manager city of Temecule 43174 Business Park Drive TemeCula, CA 92590 Subject: Temecula Shuttle Loan Request Main Street APN 922-034-029 ~667 Dear Mary Jane: I have reviewed the staff report that was to be presented to the Old Town Redevelopment Committee, on November 1, 1994, and I would offer the following comments. I would propose, under item #2, the applicant, Mr. Dool, be provided the flexibility to receive any such lower interest rate as may be determined by modification to the stipulated settlement of the Redevelopmerit Agency litigation. Secondly, I would propose provisions #4 and #5, be deleted, and in their place the following verbiage be inserted as revised, Item #4, "Temecula Shuttle shall coordinate with the land use design of the proposed Old Town Entertainment Center project should the Old Town Entertainment Center project be approved by the City Council". I feel that these two provisions will provide Mr. Dool with the higher degree of comfort that he seeks in this loan negotiation, and also will protect him from any adverse negotiating position that he could encounter in dealing with a private third party in the form of the Old Town Entertainment Center applicant. request that these modifications be presented to the Old Town Redevelopment Committee, should they meet on November 9, 1994, and most certainly to the City Council on November 15, 1994. Please feel free to call upon me if you have any questions or require any clarifications. Sincerely, .> &/ SS.O. CIATES cc: Ed Dool C: \wpdocs\joyce\mclarney. 667 417.50 Winchester Ro~d, Suite N · Teln~ala, Calife'nia 92.590 · (909) 676-6672 - lAX (909) 699-IM8 3088~ ~ W~H)~8~W 8i:0I '~'6, 80 AON ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~ ' CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEMBERS AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Board Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director November 15, 1994 Acquisition of Low and Moderate Income Housing Site Prepared by: Marilyn Whisenand RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency approve the purchase of a site located at the southwest corner of Diaz Road and Cherry Avenue for the purpose of providing low and moderate income housing within a five to ten year period. o Appropriate $3,744,368 in the low and moderate Income Housing Fund (165) BACKGROUND: On April 21, 1992, the City of Temecula acquired the parcel described above using tax allocation bond proceeds in the amount of $3,492,200. To date, total costs relating to the property equal $3,744,368. Subsequently, low and moderate income housing in the form of a senior citizen housing project was proposed as an alternative use for the site. Code Section 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law allows moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to be used to acquire real property or building sites for the purpose of increasing, preserving or improving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. According to Code Section 33334.16, development activities consistent with that purpose must be initiated on the property acquired with Low and Moderate income Housing Funds within five years of the date of acquisition. If activities have not been initiated within five years, the legislative body may, by resolution, extend the period during which the Agency may retain the property for a total of one additional period not to exceed five years. The General Plan designation for the site is Public/institutional which includes as a permitted use, low and moderate income senior housing. Within a five year period (or if extended by Agency resolution, a ten year period) the Agency must: 1 ) Initiate low and moderate income development activities on the site; 2) Sell the site and return the sale proceeds to the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Fund; or 31 Exchange the site for another site on which low and moderate income senior housing will be built. The purchase of this site for future low and moderate income housing programs will result in the return of $3,744,368 to the tax allocation bond proceeds fund and the expenditure of $3,744,368 million from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Sufficient funds will remain in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (approximately $893,268 available Fund Balance) to initiate other low and moderate housing activities during the next five years. In addition, the low/moderate fund will continue to receive a 20% set aside of tax increment annually. Deposits of approximately $1.2 million are also anticipated to be added to the fund annually. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate income Housing Fund (Acct#165-199-802-5700)in the amount of $3,744,368 is required. This transaction will return $3,744,368to the tax allocation bond fund (RDA CIP Fund) in payment for the housing site. P:\syersk\incomsta