HomeMy WebLinkAbout112994 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
NOVEMBER 29, 1994- 7:00 PM
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,/f you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk
(909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR
35. 102.35. I04ADA Title II]
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Code Sections:
1. §54956.8, Real estate negotiations; :
2. §54954.5(b),CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Amscan Inc.,
28401 Rancho California Road; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Amscan Inc.';
Under negotiation: Owner Participation Agreement for manufacturing facility. . ..
3. §54954.5(b), CONFERENCE WITH 'REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Advanced ;:
Chem~l Systems, 43153 Business Park Drive, 'Bldg. H; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula:.'
and Advanced Chemill Systems/Union Bank; Under negotiation: Developer Disposition
Agreement.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-32
Resolution: No. 94-110
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding
Invocation:
Pastor Mike Brisson, Cornerstone Community Church
Flag Salute:
Councilmember Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote, There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
I Standard Ordinance Adoation Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 18, 1994.
3
Resolution ADDrovin~ LiSt Of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
CombininQ Balance Sheets as of Seatember 30, 1994 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Exeenses and
Changes in Retained Earninos for the Three Months Ended Seatember 30, 1994
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
4.2
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three
Months Ended September 30, 1994.
Appropriate $45,000to Building and Safety Department Account No. 001-162-999-
5248 "Consulting Services".
Aoreement - City of Temecula/Eastern Municipal Water District for Construction of Sanitar'
Sewer - Solana and I-15
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the agreement, authorize the Mayor to execute and direct the City Clerk to
forward the executed agreement to Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD).
Acceotance of Public Street Imorovements Constructed under Assessment District No. 161
(Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Joseoh Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Accept the public street improvements as constructed under the Properties Ranch
Assessment District No. 161, in Nicolas Road between Winchester Road (State
Highway Route No. 79 North) and Joseph Road.
Comoletion and Acceptance of the Traffic SiQnal Modification at the Intersection of Rancho
California Road and Front Street. Project No. PW94-09
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Accept the Traffic Signal Modification at the Intersection of Rancho California Road
and Front Street, Project No. PW94-09, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1)
year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of completion if no liens have been filed.
Award of Contract for Construction of Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements,
Proiect No. PW94-03
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Award a contract for the base bid only, for the construction of Winchester road
Interim Street Improvements, Project No. PW94-03 to Chance Edmondson for the
base bid of $241,407.57 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
8.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $24,140.76 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
8.3
Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $63,000 from the Pavement
Management Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvement Project.
9 Award of Contract for the Construction of Pala Road at HiQhwav 79S Interim Right Turn
Lane, Proiect No. PW94-08
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Award a contract for base bid only, for the construction of the Pala Road at
Highway 79S Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08 to Pro-Civil
Engineering, Inc. $40,590.47 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
9.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $4,059.05 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
10
Community Facilities District 88-12 - Winchester Interchanae Imorovements Aareement
with Riverside County for Real Prooertv Services
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve an agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Real Property
Services for the acquisition of property for the Winchester Interchange
Improvements - CFD 88-12 in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
10.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s} at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
11
Cable Television Rate Reaulation
(Continued from 11/15/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DISAPPROVING THE CABLE TELEVISION RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OF INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION, AND ORDERING A
REFUND FOR EXCESSIVE RATES
12 Vest(no Tentative Tract MaD 25063 and Chanoe of Zone No. 5598
(Located on the south side of Nicolas Road approximately 2,00 feet east of Calla Girasol)
13
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25063 TO SUBDIVIDE A 20 ACRE PARCEL
INTO 68 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF CALLE
GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO. 914480-005
12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5598 TO CHANGE THE EXISTING ZONING OF R-A-2½
(RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 2~ ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO R-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING) AND R-5 (OPEN SPACE) ON A 20 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLA8 ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF
CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914480-005
Chanae of Zone Aoolication No. 26 - A Chanae of Zone for a 21.4 Acre Parcel from R-A-
20 (Residential Aoricultural-20 acre minimum oarcel size) to C-O (Commercial Office) and
R-5 (Ooen Soace)
(Located on the Southwesterly corner of Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
13o 1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 26.
13.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION
NO. 26, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20
ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO C-0 (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) AND R-5 (OPEN
SPACE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 940-310-014
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14 Msin Street Prooram (Continued from the meeting of 11/15/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Provide direction to staff on:
· The needed amendments to the existing Bylaws;
· The future organization of Main Street Association;
· The use of alternate funding sources for the Main Street Program;
· The draft Cooperative Agreement between the Old Town Mainstreet
(Merchants) Association and the City of Temecula.
15 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Goals and 0biectives
(Continued from the meeting of 11/15/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Direct staff to prepare a resolution defining the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's
Goals and Objectives.
16 EstablishinQ and Amendino Time Limits in the County of Riverside Redevelooment Plan 1-
1988
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
17
ORDINANCE NO. RDA 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING TIME LIMITS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1-1988
Community Services FundinQ Program
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding Grants for FY
1994/95.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: December 6, 1994, 6:00 PM, Joint Meeting with Murrieta City Council, Murrieta
City Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California.
Next meeting: December 7, 1994, 7:00 PM, City CounciI/RDA Workshop on Old Town
Entertainment Center, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California.
Next regular meeting: December 13, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
TEMECULA. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING * '(To be'held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2
3
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 18, 1994.
Acceotance of the Lono Valley Wash - Channel Reoair Proiect No. PW94-06.CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Accept the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, project No. PW94-06.CSD, as
complete and direct the City Clerk to:
· File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount).
· Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed to that date.
Combinino Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30.1994 and the Statement of Revenues.
Expenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30,
1994
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three
Months Ended September 30, 1994.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting December 13, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
'TEMECULA:RED EVELOPMENT AGENCY.MEETING.
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 18, 1994.
2 Combininq Balance Sheets as of September 30.1994 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30,
1~4
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three
Months Ended September 30, 1994.
3 Lease Amendment for Jefferson Street Property
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Authorize the General Counsel to prepare a lease amendment with D.L. Reeves and
authorize the Executive Director to execute the lease amendment.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the Redevelopment Agency before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City
Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
4 Adootion of AB-1290 Implementation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Conduct a public hearing end adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING A FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1-1998
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: December 13, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
NEW BUSINESS
I~I~F. OLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA, RECrr/NG THF~ FACT OF ~
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ~LF~'TIONm~ .n ONNOVEMBER
8, 1994, DECLARING ~ I/v-~J_.,T AND SUCH OTHER
MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
~, a General Municipa! Election was held and conducted in the City of
Temeofla~ C~lifornia, on Tueaday, November 8, 1994, as required by law; and
W~EREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by
law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and
that in all respects the election was held and conducted end the votes were cast, received and
canvassed and the returns made and dea-I~red in time, form and manner as required by the
provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and
W!n~,EAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-94-70 adopted June 28, 1994, the County
Election Deparunent canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this
City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A."
NOW TI-IR'REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTFY OF TEMECULA, DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the City, except absent voter ballots,
Was
Section 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the
City Council are as follows:
Ronald J. Parks
Karel F. Lindemans
Kathleen Eiserbeck
Billie Goode Blair
Eric Bwwn
Gary M. Sullivan
Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes
given in the city to each of the persons above named for the offices for which the persons were
candidates was as listed in Exhibit "A" attached.
Section 4. The City Council does declare and determine that Ronald J. Parks and Karel
F. Lindemans were elected as Mereben of the City Council for the full term of four years.
Rues 44 I
Section 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a
statemeat of the remzlt of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the
City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) For what office each person was voted for;
(4) The number of votes Zivea at each precinct to each person; (5) The total number of votes
given to each person.
Seelion 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately malz and deliver to each person so
elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk
shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office pw. scribed in the Consttimtion of
the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City
Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shah !hen be inducted into the respective office
to which they have been elected.
Section 7. The City Cl~k shall cenif~J the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTII), this 29th day of November, 1994.
ATI~,ST:
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL)
2
STATE OF CAI.rFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, J-IEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 29th day of November, 1994 by the following roll call vote.
0 CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD OCTOBER 18, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:08 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron
Roberrs presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone,
Roberrs
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Also present were Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, City Attorney Peter M.
Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Ron Bolt, People's Church of the Valley.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Roberrs proclaimed the week of October 23-31, 1994 as "Red Ribbon Week". Paul
Colaluca, Project Coordinator of Temecula Community Partnership, accepted the proclamation
and thanked the City Council for their support.
Mayor Roberrs presented City Clerk June Greek with a plaque signifying her completion of the
educational requirements for Certified Municipal Clerk and congratulated her for her
accomplishment.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Roberrs announced the next candidates forum will be held on November 1,1994, 7:00
PM, at the Community Recreation Center and will be broadcast on Inland Cable on Friday,
November 4, 1994, 7:00 PM and Saturday, November 5, 1994 at 10:30 AM.
Councilmember Birdsall reminded the public that City Council meetings in November have
been scheduled for November 15th and November 29th. She also encouraged the public to
vote on November 8th.
Minutes\l 0~18\94 - 1 - 11/21/94
CiW Council Minutes October 18.1994
Councilmember Mu~oz requested that staff either enforce the campaign sign ordinance or
make it clear to the candidates that the ordinance will not be enforced. Mayor Roberrs
requested staff look into the penalties for placing campaign signs on public utility poles.
Mayor Roberrs announced that next week the Sister City Officials from Japan will be visiting
during the coming week, and the official Sister City Signing ceremony will take place on
Monday, October 24, 1994 at 10:00 AM at the Community Recreation Center.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Roberts announced that Items 10 and 11 will be continued to the meeting of November
15, 1994. Councilmember Birdsall stated she would abstain on Items 6 and 8 due to a
conflict of interest. Mayor Pro Tern Stone requested the removal of Item No. 5 from the
Consent Calendar and asked a question on Item on 4.
4. Utility Easements for Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03 CSD
Mayor Pro Tern Stone asked why there is such a dramatic difference in the number of
feet needed for Rancho Water as opposed to Southern California, Interim Public Works
Director Joe Kicak explained that Southern California Edison only requires a small,
shallow conduit where wires can be pulled from either direction, as opposed to Rancho
Water where a larger area is necessary so that equipment can be operated for the
entire length of the pipe. Mr. Kicak requested that Item No, 4.1, the Rancho Water
District easement request, be deleted from the staff recommendation because there is
a proposal from staff to realign the roadway and when the roadway is realigned, the
water line will be within another right-a-way.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he would abstain on Items 5, 13 and 14 due to a conflict of
interest. He asked a question on Item No. 7.
7. Award of Construction Contract for Proiect No. PW94-12 FY 94-95 Slurrv Seal Proiect.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked how the timing of this contract would be effected by
weather conditions. interim Public Works Director Joe Kicak explained that the days
of work could be limited due to weather conditions and the specifications of the
contract would provide for extension of time due to weather without penalties,
Minutes\l 0%18\94 -2- 11121/94
City Council Minutes October 18, 1994
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 6-9, 10-15, with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining on Items 5,
13 and 14 and Councilmember Birdsall abstaining on Items 6 and 8.
registered a "no" vote on Item No. 15.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
Mayor Roberrs also
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of AuQust 31.1994
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1994.
Utility Easements for Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03 CSD
4.2 Approve the Southern California Edison easement for electrical service to the
Pala Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document.
Minutes\ 10\ 18\94 -3- 11/21/94
Citv Council Minutes October 18, 1994
10.
11.
Establishment of Fee for Newsrack Installation Encroachment Permit
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR APPLICATION FOR THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
Pale Park Reimbursement Aereement
10. 1 Continue to the meeting of November 15, 1994.
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Aoreement and Public Imorovement Bonds in Tract
21(;)(17
11.1 Continue to the meeting of November 15, 1994.
12. Sanitary Sewer - Solana Way/l-15 Crossina
12.1
Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement authorizing Eastern Municipal Water
District (EMWD) to proceed with design and construction of Solaria Way/l-15
Sewer Pipeline Crossing.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13. Ordinance No. 94-29
13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
5589, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) AND A-2-20
(HEAVY AGRICULTURE, 20 ACRE MINIMUM) TO 8P (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION
OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD
Minutes\l 0\18\94 -5- 11/21/94
City Council Minutes October 18, 1994
14.
15.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
ABSTAIN: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ordinance No. 94-30
14.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
Birdsall, Stone, RobeKs
None
Parks
Mu~oz
ORDINANCE NO. 94-30
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263
(REGIONAL CENTER) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Munoz
Ordinance No. 94-31
15.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
COSCAN HOMES CALIFORNIA, INC., DBA COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES, FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164- RORIPAUGH, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-
0017
Minutes\l 0\18%94 -6- 11/21/94
City Council Minutes October 18. 1994
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Contract Amendment No. 8 to Community Facilities District 88-12 EnaineerinQ Services
Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the I-15/Rancho California Road
InterchanQe Modifications
Mayor Pro Tam Stone voiced his objection to a $1 07,000change order and asked for
an explanation.
Mr. John Candee, J.Fo Davidson, explained that Caltrans has changed their criteria.
He also stated that when the contract was originally estimated, there was limited
definition to the job and costs for drainage facilities have increased dramatically. He
explained cost estimates came in at half of what the actual project cost will be. Mr.
Candee outlined the various changes of the projects explaining that the work has
doubled and their price has gone up by 20%.
Mayor Roberts asked for an update on Overland Bridge and Winchester. Mr. Candee
gave an update on these projects.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Roberrs to approve staff
recommendation.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberrs
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
Minutes\ 1 O\ 18\94 -7- 11/21/94
CiW Council Minutes October 18, 1994
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to
continue this item to the meeting of November 15, 1994.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
16.
Walcott Corridor Imorovements, Project No. PW94-10, Rancho California Water District
FundinQ Request
Interim Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report.
Councilmember Birdsall asked if this request is denied, will this project go forward.
Interim Public Work Director Kicak stated the Water District is obligated to relocate the
existing waterline at no charge to the City.
Bob Lemons, P.O. Box 9017, Director of Engineering, Rancho California Water District,
asked that the City cooperate with the Water District to expedite this project. He
explained that creating an assessment district to raise these funds in this economic
climate would be very difficult, and would cause a major delay in this project.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he feels it is a dangerous precedence to assist with the
funding of utilities.
RECESS
Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 8:08 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened
at 8:09 PM.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggested the City of Temecula Finance Department and the
Rancho California Water District work together to fund this project on a loan basis.
Minutes\l O\ 18\94 -8- 11/21/94
CiW Council Minutes October 18. 1994
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation with further direction to staff to work with the Rancho
California Water District to explore a possible re-imbursement agreement to assist in
the funding.
16.1 Deny the request by Rancho California Water District to use city funds to
relocate an existing water line within existing street right-of-way.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
RECES~
Mayor Roberts called a recess at 8:12 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 8:58 PM.
17. Traffic Sianalization Report
Interim Public Work Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report.
Mayor Roberrs asked if Rancho California Water District's plans to install a water line
would delay the traffic signal at Winchester and Nicolas Road. Interim Public Works
Director Joe Kicak stated he does not see any reason for the City to delay the project
until the water line is in. He stated, all the equipment that needs to be installed, with
the exception of detector loops, can be installed. He recommended proceeding with
the installation as soon as possible, with the exception of the detector loops.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested looking into the possibility of costs savings for
temporary signals by utilizing hanging signals. He reported he has seen this type of
signal utilized in other cities on a permanent basis.
Mayor Pro Tern Stone expressed concern regarding aesthetics of the City and stated
he prefers standard signals.
Mayor Roberrs declared the report received and filed and staff was given direction by
Council consensus to proceed with the installation of the signal at the intersection of
Winchester Road and Nicolas Road with the exception of the detector loops.
Minutes\l 0\18\94 -9- 11/21/94
City Council Minutes
18.
October 18, 1994
"No Parkina" on Palma Drive and Valleio Avenue across from the Rancho Community
Church
Interim Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report.
Larry Markham, Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association President, 30105 Cabrillo
Avenue, requested that a "no parking" area be created on the west side of Palma Drive
and north side of Vallejo Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church. He cited
problems with landscape being damaged and sprinklers broken. He suggested a
physical barrier be erected to prevent people from damaging the landscaping.
RECESS
Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 9:25 PM to change the tape.
reconvened at 9:26 PM.
The meeting was
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to post
"No Parking" signs, and work with the church regarding hours.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she would prefer to have the signs on a permanent
basis, due to on-going church events which are not limited to Sundays, such as
funerals, weddings, youth events, etc.
Councilmember Mu~oz amended his motion, Mayor Pro Tem Stone amended his
second and directed staff to post "No Parking" signs designating the North side of
Vallejo Avenue and the East side of Palma Avenue as a no parking zone, the specific
posting area to be at the final determination of the Director of Public Works.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberrs
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
19. Pro and Con Presentations on Propositions 186 and 187
Councilmember Birdsall stated she requested this item be placed on the agenda as an
informational item only and did not intend the City Council to take any specific
positions on these propositions.
City Clerk June Greek announced that Kathy Wodehouse would be speaking as a
proponent of Proposition 186 and Joan Smith would be speaking as an opponent. She
explained each speaker would be given five minutes to speak, after which time anyone
Minutes~10\18%94 -10- 11121f94
City Council Minutes October 19, 1994
who filed a Request to Speak Form will be given 5 minutes to address their
questions/comments.
Kathy Wodehouse presented her views as a proponent of Proposition 186. Joan Smith
presented her views as an opponent of Proposition 186.
City Clerk June Greek read the Official Title and Summary prepared by the Attorney
General on Proposition 187, since staff was unable to obtain speakers on this issue.
20. Contract Award - PreDaration of Santa MarQarita Watershed Plans - Districts I and 111
Interim Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report requesting no action
be taken on this item and that it be continued off-calendar.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item off-calendar.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
21. Discussion on Borell Airport Industrial Park Traffic and Circulation Concerns
City Attorney Peter Thorson reported that Item No. 21 raises two issues; one, the
general concern raised in Councilmember Mu~oz' memo regarding that lack of
communication between the City and County regarding projects in the City's Sphere
of Influence, and two, traffic concerns in areas that comprise Assessment District 161.
He stated he has advised Councilmember Mu~oz he can discuss communications
concerns between the City and County with respect to projects within the sphere of
influence because it is a general matter, but should not participate on the discussion
involving Assessment District 161. He recommended the two issues be separated.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern that a letter on official City letterhead was
sent by Councilmember Mu~oz using the term "we", when no official position had been
taken by the Council. She also asked if it is appropriate that Councilmember Mu~oz
address issues regarding Assessment District 161 when he does have a conflict.
City Attorney Thorson stated the issue of speaking in terms of "we" or "1" is a matter
of clarification. He stated that on the issue of ownership of real property or source of
income, a Councilmember is not to participate in the Council's consideration or
discussion of the issue.
Minutes\10~18~94 -11- 11/21/94
City Council Minutes October 18. 1994
Councilmember Mu~ioz stated his only reason for bringing forward this issue was to
address the general attitude of County staff regarding input from the City of Temecula.
City Clerk June Greek read a letter from Supervisor Kay Ciniceros addressing
Councilmember Mu~oz' letter.
RECESS
Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 10:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:26 PM.
Ray Borel, 30195 Auld Road, Murrieta, representing the property owners of Borel
Airpark, stated that this project has gone through an extensive public hearing process
and both the City and County have worked diligently on this project.
Pat Keller, P.O. Box 521, stated she lives in AD 161 and expressed concern that fees
would be raised to help fund road improvements.
Rob A. Spriggs, 39237 Corte Tasaro, Murrieta, stated there has been a lack of
communication between both the cities of Temecula and Murrieta and the County of
Riverside. He suggested the cities of Temecula and Murrieta form a coalition to discuss
these traffic issues.
Rita Gentry, 37100 Los Alamos Road, Murrieta, expressed concerns regarding traffic
and air quality which will be affected by this project.
Jeannine Gillen, 387160Ave La Cresta, Murrieta, expressed concerns regarding traffic
and the need for better communication between the County and surrounding cities.
Ray Johnson, 24508 Lincoln, Murrieta, stated he did not receive the required notices
regarding this project from the County of Riverside.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Roberts to direct that a
letter to the County Board of Supervisors be prepared for the Mayor's signature
requesting that the City of Temecula be kept fully appraised of any and all projects that
are located within the City's Sphere of Influence area. It was further recommended
that the joint City of Temecula and Murrieta Traffic and Transportation Committee be
better utilized by presenting traffic related matters within the cities Sphere of Influence
areas to that group for review.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mufioz, Stone, Roberrs
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Minutes~l O\I 8~94 - 12- 11/21194
City Council Minutes October 18, 1994
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to adjourn at
11:02 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Parks absent.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\ 1 O\ 18\94 - 13- 11/21/94
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXtIIRIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$695,511.89.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 29th day of November, 1994.
ATI'F~T:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Rc,o, 42 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TFA4F_EULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopt~l at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 29th day of November, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYF3: 0
COUNCILNm-MBERS: None
NOF_S: 0
COUNCILlv~MBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
11/10/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/17/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/29/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/17/94 TOTAL PAYROLL;
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/29/94 COUNCIL MEE"RNG:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS * TCSD
280 RDA-CIP
300 SELF-~NSURANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
155 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 RDA-CIP
300 SELF-INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON
GENIE ROBERTS, INTERIM FINANCE OFFICER
$ 37,567.57
153,823.86
393,807.60
110,312.86
$ 695,511.89
108,144.35
44,787.87
0.00
0.00
5,538.96
49,504,49
15,304.40
32,740.36
20,856.58
0,00
126,585.90
12,751.09
0.00
140,957.96
14,262.38
0.00
6,718.08
2,929.78
0.00
2,45129
$ 585,199.03
58,822.65
14,285.74
588.96
18,805,84
447.87
616.31
1,807.67
356.10
600.09
$ 695,511.89
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 5
11/09/94 15:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIORS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOft/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
]20 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
ANOUNT
19,763.81
1,83;7.69
39.85
9,687.68
306.42
19.96
2,202.52
16.16
422.38
660.46
2,071.57
9.60
529.47
TOTAL 37,567.57
15:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR V~MDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER RARE
20933 11/07/94 000155 DAVLIN
20933 11/07/94 000155 DAVL[N
20937 11/10/94 000724
20938 11/10/94 000101 APPLE ONE
20939
11/10/94 000474 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
CITY OF TERECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL pERIODS
ZTEH ACCOLINT
DESCRIPTION Nt,lq~ER
AUDIO TAPE OF I0/11COUNCXL ME 001-100-~-5250
AUOIO TAPE OF 10/18 COUNCXL ME 001-100-~9-5250
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SPORTS pROGRAMS AWARDS
TEMPOIL~RY HELP THRU 10/29/94
TRIM 3 TREES-CLASSIC WAY
BOTTLED WATER - CITY HALL
20940 11/10/94 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER
20941 11/10/94 000622 BANTA ELECTRZC-REFRIGER RUN DED. LINE TO PROJ SCREEN
190-183-~-5380
001-140-~-5118
100-164-601-5402
340-199-~-5240
190-182-~-5212
20942 11/10/94 000370 BIRDSALL, PATRZCIA
20943 11/10/94 000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER RECIPROCATZOR SAW RENTAL
20944 11/10/94 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC LSS #20738 FIRE ALARM SIGN
2094z+ 11/10/94 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC FREIGHT
20944 11/10/94 001195 CENTPJ~L SECURITY SERVIC TAX
11/10/94 001275 CONPUSERV, INC. 1NFORHAT[ON SERVICE*OCTOBER
20946 11/10/94 001629 CREATIVE HYDROSEED~ %NC HYDROSEED'LONG VLY WASH
20947 11/10/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO
20948 11/10/94 001233 DAH'S FEED & SEED, INC.
20949 11/10/94 001029 DATAQUICK
20950 11/10/94 DIAMOND, JOHN
20951 11/10/94 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
20952 11/10/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
20953 11/10/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
20953 11/10/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
20953 11/10/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
20953 11/10/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
20954 11/10/94 0001~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
20955 11/10/94 000643 FORTHER HAROWARE
20956 11/10/94 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA
10/22-25 CALZF CITIES CONFEREN 001-100-~-5258
VEHICLE HA1NT/PUBLIC WORKS
PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS
CO RON DATA/PLAT NAP-NOVEMbER
CANCELLATION OF TCSD CLASS
AP CHECK PRINT pRDGRAM NC3OIF
PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR SEPT 9
IRRIGATION REPAIR
IRRIGATION LINE REPAIR
DISPUTE ON IRRIG REPAIR
DISPUTE-LABOR CHARGE EXCESSIVE
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
MISC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES
10/28-11/27 ACCESS CHARGES
190-180-999-5Z38
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
320-199-999-5228
193-180-999-5415
100-164-601-5214
100-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5250
190-183-4980
320-199-999-5211
001-161-999-5250
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
280-199-999-5250
100-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5208
ITEM
AI~K~UNT
701,67
701.67
414.77
412.80
300.00
139.8~
280.00
32.25
81.93
10.59
14.69
30.23
448.50
26.95
4.7~
85.24
6.00
270. O0
10,320.00
926.56
298.04
742.10-
240. O0 -
400.00
38.09
350.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
M~XJNT
1,403.~4
414.77
412.80
300.00
139.86
280.00
32.25
33.27
107.21
30.2~
/,48.50
26.95
4.79
85.24
6,00
270. O0
10,320.00
242.50
400.00
38.09
350.00
VOUCHREZ CiTY OF TEMECULA P' 2
11/09/94 15:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIORS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
20957 11/10/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
20957 11/10/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
20957 11/10/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
20957 11/10/94 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
909 695-3539 GEN
909 699-0128 -GEN
909 699-2309 GEM
909-699-6267 FILM COUNCIL
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
23.10
288.09
22.83
17.07
351.09
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROUUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROUUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRQOUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
20958 11/10/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES CRC
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CiTY NGR DEPT
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MiSC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURN OF OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURN OF OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURN OF OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD
190-182-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
9.93
138.77
20.97
26.40
5.47
1.43-
5.27-
11.44-
183.40
20959 11/10/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 12" MONITOR
320-199-999-5221
100.82
100.82
20960 11/10/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
20960 11/10/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
20960 11/10/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
20960 11/10/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
P/W DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT
TAX
RECRUIT BROCHURES TVEDC\MAIN S
TAX
001-150-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
20961 11/10/94 000]66 HARRINGTON, KEVIN 11/1-2 IRRIGATION AUDIT COURSE 190-180-999-5258
579.00
44.87
555.00
43.01
68.51
1,221.88
20962 11/10/94 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001-150-999-5250
331.50
331.50
20963 11/10/94 HOLIDAY SIGNS HOLIDAY CLOSING SIGNS 001-120-999-5228
19.00
19.00
20964 11/10/94 001351 INLAND EMPIRE ECONORIC IEEP MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON 12/8 001-110-999-5258
60.00
60.00
20965 11/10/94 000203 JOBS AVAILABLEe 1NC. RECRUIT FOR MAIN ST DIRECTOR 001'150-999-5254
64.80
64.80
20966 11/10/94 KNIGHT, NANCY
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 190-2900
100.00
100.00
20967 11/10/94 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC TEST VIALS
20968 11/10/94 001123 KNOX iNDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE SM TOOLS FOR CATCH BASIN CLEAN
20968 11/10/94 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX
190-182-999-5212
100-164-601-5242
100-164-601-5242
15.90
21.40
1.66
15.90
23.06
20969 11/10/94 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CiTY MANAGER MEETING
001-110-999-5260
39.00
39.00
20970 11/10/94 MAAB, LINDA REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 190-1RX'4982
20971 11/10/94 001526 MICNAELS STORES, INC, CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301
20971 11/10/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301
20972 11/10/94 0009T$ MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI SLIDE REPAIR PARTS 190-180"999-5212
8.15
12.88
64.40
34.21
8.15
77.28
S4.21
20973 11/10/94 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS PURCHASE ORDER FORMS 001-140-999-5222 532.12
20973 11/10/94 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 20.04
20973 11/10/94 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS TAX 001-140-999-5222 41.24
Vr ? CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
1, 4 15:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
20974 11/10/94 001657 MULTI-PURE CORPORATION
20975 11/10/94 001150 O'BRIEN, CARY
20976 11/10/94 001656 OMEGA PRINT
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
20977 11/10/94 001561 PAGENET
PAGING NETWOR
PAGING NETWOR
PAGING NETWOR
PAGING NETWOR
PAGING NET~iOR
PAGING NETWOR
PAGING NET~OR
PAGING NETWOR
20978 11/10/94 000248 PETROLANE
20979 11/10/94 000580 PHOTO ~ORKS
20979 11/10/94 000580 PHOTO ~ORKS
11/10/94 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY
~1 11/10/94 000947 RANCNO SELL BLUEPRINT C
20981 11/10/94 000947 SANCHO SELL BLUEPRINT C
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO DALIFORNIA WATER
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
20982 11/10/94 000262 SANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
20983 11/10/94 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
20984 11/10/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
20984 11/10/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
20985 11/10/94 000645 SMART & FINAL
20985 11/10/94 000645 SMART & FINAL
20985 11/10/94 000645 SMART & FINAL
20985 11/10/94 000645 S~RT & FINAL
20986 11/10/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
20986 11/10/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
20987 11/10/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
20988 11/10/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
20988 11/10/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
~8 11/10/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
,0 11/10/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REPL FILTER-KITCHEN SINK FAUCE
EMERG FENCE REPAIR-CITY YARD
MISC. LEGAL SUPPLIES - STEIN
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PAGER$ NOVEMBER 1994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 19994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PAGERS NOVEMBER 1994
PROPANE FOR TCSD VEHICLES
FILM AND SLIDE DEVELOPMENT
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
C.R.C. WATER SLIDE GATE
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTIONS
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
01-06-84300-19/13-10/12/94
WATER SERVICE 9/8-10/7/94
WATER SERVICE 9/8-10/7/94
WATER SERVICE 9/8-10/7/94
WATER SERVICE 9/8-10/7/94
WATER SERVICE 9/8-10/7/94
RECRUIT FOR MAIN ST DIR.
BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT
TAX
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
PEST CONTROL SERV-SENIOR CNTR
PEST CONTROL SERVICES-CRC
66-77-584-8087-02 STOP, AGE BLDG
51-77-905-57~5-01 9/30-11/1
52-77-796-7050-02 10/3-11/2
52-77-812-9861-01 10-/13-11/2
52-77-899-0011-02 10/1-11/2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-'~-521Z
300-199-999-5207
300-1999-999-5207
001-100-999-5250
001-162-~-5238
001-163-999-5250
001-165-999-5238
100-164-601-5238
001-170-999-5242
190-180-999-5250
320-199-999-52S8
190-180-999-5263
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5212
210-165-652-5802
001-163-999-5268
100-164-601-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-150-999-5254
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
340-199-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
ITEM
AMOUNT
43.09
100.00
551.96
22.50
22.50
15.00
7.50
15.00
22.50
67.50
19.95
131.19
15.08
74.53
275.00
16.16
25.86
18.29
2,928.50
95.04
1,386.75
206.79
1,361.11
196.35
668.16
51.79
126.31
51.08
75.28
29,00
42.00
29.63
15.36
1,268.10
14.60
15.36
CHECK
AMOUNT
43.09
100.00
551.96
192.45
131.19
89.61
275.00
42.02
5,996.48
196.35
719.95
351.97
71.00
29.63
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 4
11/09/94 15:43 VOUCHER/CHECN REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
20988
20988
20989
Z0990
20990
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20991
20992
20992
20993
20993
20994
20995
20996
20996
20996
20996
20997
20998
20998
20998
20998
20998
20998
20999
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
11/10/94
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND SAN FRANCI
000574 SUPER TONER
000574 SUPER TONER
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000825 TEMECULA CYCLES
000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
001545 TIME MOTION TOULS
001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS
001545 TIME MOTION TCX:)LS
001545 TIME MOTION TOULS
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000348 ZIGLER, GAIL
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECN
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
52-77-899-2622-02 11/1-11/2
43-77-077-5209-03 8.r$1-9/30
193-180-999-5240
192-180-999-5319
BATTERIES FOR NEC P200
320-199-999-5220
NAINTENANCE/BLDG&SAFTY VEHICLE 001-162-999-5214
OVERCHARGE FOR OIL CHANGE 001-162-999-5214
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 001-2370
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 100-2370
WORKERS# CORP FOR OCTOBER 1994 165'Z$70
~ORKERS# CQNP FOR OCTOBER 1994 190-2370
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 191'2370
WORKERS' CORP FOR OCTOBER 1994 193-2370
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 192-2370
WORKERS' COMP FOR OCTOBER 1994 280-2370
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 300-2~70
WORKERS' CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 320-2370
WORKERS# CONP FOR OCTOBER 1994 330-2370
WORKERS~ COMP FOR OCTOBER 1994 340-~370
HP LASER TONER II (REFURB)
TAX
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE
001-170-999-5214
FLCNERS FOR SIGNING CEREMONY 001-100-999-5258
TMT-58WLS WIRE LOCATOR
TMT-A~28 8-WIRE ADAPTER
FREIGHT
TAX
320-199-999-5Z42
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-163-999-5220
UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR TCSD
UNIFORM MAINT/PUBLIC ~ORKS
UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR TCSD
FLOOR MAT RENTAL/CLEAN-CITY
FLOOR MAT RENTAL/CLEAN-CRC
FLOOR NAT RENTAL/CLEAN-SR CNT
190-180-999-5243
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
340~199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
RECEPTION FOR SIGNING CEREMONY 001-100-999-5258
15.36
15.99
81.89
24.99
4.00-
3,487.84
1,388.51
39.85
1,659.88
84.27
119.69
3.97
22.38
8.50
21.37
9.60
286.14
450.00
34.~
55.87
28.96
173.05
197.99
220.00
31.90
4.68
19.52
45.15
17.43
23.00
16.35
30.75
69.39
16.75
123.75
1,344.77
81.89
20.99
7,132.00
8~.83
173.05
197.99
276.10
45.15
175.67
123.75
TOTAL CHECKS 37,567.57
Vr '2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 10
1 4 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIQOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOkJ/NI3~ SET AS[DE
190 CONHUNZTY SERVZCES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVZCE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C[P
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 iNFORNAT[ON SYSTEHS
SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
ANOUNT
/,1,3~8.27
257.9/,
15,883.04
14,523.01
2,385.20
100.21
11,422.93
4,6/.6.51
1,918.10
1,136.06
10.00
TOTAL 153,823.8~
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 1
11/17/94 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FO~ ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
21000 11/14/04 001659 LAW FIRM OF FIDLER,BELL MURRIETA CREEK LITIG. CONTRIBU 300-199'999-5207
21001 11/14/94 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ANNUAL INFORMATION STATEMENT ]90-1~-~-5227
5,000.00
10.00
5#000.00
10.00
21002 11/14/94
THONPSON'CLAUDIO, ALICI REFUND FOR SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990
100.00
100.00
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 001-2070 10,334.54
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDEP. AL 100-2070 2,175.62
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 165-2070 105.16
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IR$) 00028~ FEDERAL 190-2070 2,596.32
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 191-2070 46.88
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 71.74
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (XRS) 00028] FEDERAL 193-2070 213.16
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 280-2070 30.24
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] FEDERAL 300-2070 88,33
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 279.83
409444 11/17/94 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 99.11
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (XRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 143.60
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX CIRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 2,539.46
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 518.]9
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 21.08
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 676.08
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 17.44
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 23.12
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 63.98
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 11.64
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.51
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 58.36
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (XRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 24,76
409444 11/17/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0002~ MEDICARE ]40-2070 64.76
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 471,3]
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 127.03
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 190.49
46146? 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 191-2070 7.81
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 192-2070 10.37
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 193-2070 17.80
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 300-2070
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 330-2070 11.10
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 25.19
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 2,717.95
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 543.81
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 22.49
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 542.69
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 15.40
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 9.06
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 44,95
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 8.48
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 ]0.22
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 64.13
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 330-2070 19.65
20,226.11
V¢ ~ C[TY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
1~ + 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
461467 11/17/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
Z1009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
21009 11/17/94 000680
AMS TMS
AMS TMS
AMS TMS
AHS TNS
AMS TNS
AMS TNS
AMS TM$
AMS TNS
AMS TNS
AMS TMS
21010 11/17/94 000921 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE
21011 11/17/94 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP.
21012 11/17/94 001642 ALL-STAR AWARDS AND PRO
21012 11/17/94 001642 ALL-STAR AWARDS AND PRO
21012 11/17/94 001642 ALL-STAR AWARDS AND PRO
:~""~2 11/17/94 001642 ALL-STAR AWARDS AND PRO
11/17/94 001642 ALL-STAR AWARDS AND PRO
21013 11/17/94 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE
21014 11/17/94 000112 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
21014 11/17/94 000112 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
21014 11/17/94 000112 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
21015 11/17/94 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
21016 11/17/94 C R E ELECTRIC
21017 11/17/94
21017 11/17/94
21017 11/17/94
21017 11/17/94
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
21018 11/17/94 000484 CALIFORNIA ASSOC LOCAL
21019 11/17/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
21019 11/17/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
21020 11/17/94 000699 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICE
21021 11/17/94 000950 CALIFORNIAN o DISPLAY
21021 11/17/94 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
21022 11/17/94
CAREERTRACK SEMINARS MS
11/17/94 001195 CENTPj~L SECURITY SERVIC
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000444 STATE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
NOVEMBER INSURANCE PMT
6015202 9/27-10/18
66 P/T UNIFORM SHIRTS
6 P/T UNXFORM SHIRTS
SCREENING
ARTWORK
TAX
POSTAGE MACH NAINT AGREE RENEW
DUES/PLANNING & LAW-D. UBNOSKE
APA DUES FOR JOHN MEYER
DUES FOR RUIZ & HOGAN
EMERGENCY REPAIR-FIELD LIGHT
REFUND-REINSPECTION FEES
TRASH PUMP 3" RENTAL
TRASH PUMP 3" RENTAL
PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL EQUIP
PARK MAINTENANCE RENTAL EQUIP
LOCAL PERMIT STREAMLINING ~I~SH
INSTALL COLOR IN MEDIAN AREAS
GRADING PRIOR TO HYDROSEED
1995 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE COURSE
JOB RECRUITMENT (1100533000)
JOB RECRUITMENT (1100533000)
WKSHP EXCELLING AS A SUPERV[SO
FIRE ALARM MOSITORING-CRC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-2070
001-100-999-52~0
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-140-999-52~0
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
100-164-604-5210
320-199-999-52]0
300-199-999-5204
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
2]0-199-999-5217
001-161-999-5226
001-161-999-5226
001-161-999-5226
190-182-999-5212
001-162-4285
190-180-999-5218
190-180-999-5218
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
001-161-999-5261
191-180-999-5415
193-180-99~-5415
001-170-999-5261
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-161-999-5261
190-182-999-5250
[TEN
AMOUNT
16.03
11.54
49.48
141.41
100.86
82.52
267.82
107.64
143.20
174.16
6.94
6,128.48
75.81
528.00
59.10
24.50
25.00
49.34
450.00
15.00
269. O0
272.00
230.50
150.00
21.65
96.88
11.60
10.78
50.00
?28.00
256.00
624.00
198.00
53.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,899.59
1,085.57
6,128.48
75.81
685.94
450.00
556.00
2]0.50
150.00
140.91
50.00
984.00
624.00
47.52
198.00
53.00
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECtJLA F 3
11/17/94 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
21024 11/17/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC.
21024 11/17/94 000137 CHEWON U S A INC.
21024 11/17/94 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC.
21025 11/17/94 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
21026 11/17/94 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED
21027 11/17/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO
21027 11/17/94 001535 CREEKSXDE TEXACO
21028 11/17/94 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
21028 11/17/94 001393 DATA T[CKET, INC.
21028 11/17/94 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
21028 11/17/94 001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
21029 11/17/94 000155 DAVLIN
21030 11/17/94 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS
21031 11/17/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
21032 11/17/94 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC
21033 11/17/94 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
21033 11/17/94 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21034 11/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
21035 11/17/94 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE
21036 11/17/94 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY
21036 11/17/94 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
21036 11/17/94 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST CUMPANY
21036 11/17/94 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY
21037 11/17/94 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
21037 11/17/94 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
21038 11/17/94 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
FUEL EXPENSE FOR OCT 94
FUEL EXPENSE FOR OCT 94
FUEL EXPENSE FOR OCT 94
001-170-999'526Z
001-161-999-5262
100-164-602-5262
%RRIG pARTS-SPORTS PARK
190-180-999-5212
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM FY94-95 100-164-602-5406
VEHICLE MAINT. FOR PUBLIC
VEHICLE HAINT. PUBLIC WORKS
100-164-601-5214
100-16~-60~-5214
PROCESSING CITAT/ONS; 1000 a
PROCESSING CITATIORS; 1000 a
ADM]N/STRAT/VE REV/EW PROCESS
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEM PROCESS
001-140-999-5250
001-170-999-5250
001-170-999-5250
001-140-999-5250
PLANNING CUMMISSION TAPING 001-161-999-5250
MEDICAL CARE FOR POLICE DOG 001-170-999-5327
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE
001-140-999-5230
FUTURE INCREMENT STUDY MEETING 280-199-999-5248
PRE*EMPLOYNENT PHYSICALS
FLU SHOTS
001-150-999-5248
001-2640
5473 6664 03910081-RR
547~ 6664 039100~O-PB
5473 6664 0391 0107-HE
5473 6664 0391 0164-JSM
5473 6664 0391 016~
5473 6664 0391 0172-RB
5473 66~ 0391 0057 SN
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5250
001-110-999-5228
190-180-919-5260
MISC SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 190-180-999-5212
REFILLS FOR DALLY PLANNERS
REPLACEMENT FILLER 11849
FREIGHT
TAX
190-180-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
COFFEE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
COFFEE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
340-199-999-5250
3~0-199-999-5250
909 694-6400 GEN
320-199-999-5208
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CSD ADMIN,
OFFICE SUPPLIES*CITY MGR DEPT
190-182-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5ZZ0
001-110-999-5220
7Z.77
36.50
9.80
71.65
800.00
80.22
66.80
41.75
41.75
66.75
66.75
150.00
17.82
9.00
690.00
90.00
120.00
277.44
385.49
1.00
154.56
1.05
8.00
65.93
178.22
49.40
59.85
6,95
5.18
113.46
154.18
681.68
19.77
23.49
3/,4.77
9.65
119.07
71.65
800.00
147.02
217.00
150.00
17.82
6
210.00
893.47
178.22
121.38
267.64
681.68
Vr '2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 4
1 4 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE ~,q~BER NAME DESCRIPTION
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
21039 11/17/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CSD ADMIN.
21040 11/17/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE MONITOR PLATFORM
21040 11/17/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE PRINTER STAND
21040 11/17/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE AVERY LASER CARDS
21040 11/17/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT
21040 11/17/94 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX
21041 11/17/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO ERGNONIC KEYBOARD
21041 11/17/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO FREIGHT
21041 11/17/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX
21042 11/17/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
21042 11/17/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
21042 11/17/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
21042 11/17/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
21043 11/17/94 000806 HOWARD, BOBBY
~'~44 11/17/94 000193 I C M A - ANNAPOLIS JUN
RECREATION SUPPLIES
REPAIR AND NA[NT ITEMS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
ELECTED OFFICIALS HANDBOOKS 94
j 11/17/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
21045 11/17/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP
21045 11/17/94 000194 [ C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
21046 11/17/94 JACQUES, JIM
21047 11/17/94 001651 JIM DUKE SERVICE CONPAN
21047 11/17/94 001651 JIM DUKE SERVICE COMPAN
21048 11/17/94 000860 JOCHUM, LORI
21049 11/17/94 001662 KAWASAKI OF RIVERSIDE
21050 11/17/94 000886 KHALSA, ATHA KAUR
21051 11/17/94 001607 L D D S COMMUNICATIONS,
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
SERVICE TO COFFEE MACHINE CRC
SERVICE TO COFFEE NACHINE-CRC
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
REPAIRS TO POLICE MOTORCYCLE
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
LONG DISTANCE-ACCT 7800002408
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER REDLINER FOR TCSD VEHICLE
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER SIDE MOUNT TOOL BOXES
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TIRES
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER FILTER
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LABOR
~2 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TAX
2 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999'5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999'5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190o182-999-5301
~40-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
190-18~-999-5330
001-110-999-5228
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
192-2080
193-2080
300-2080
340-2080
190-183-4982
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-183-999-5330
001-170-999-5214
190-18~-999-5330
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
21,85-
186.42-
29.95
25.95
9.75
14.95
5.53
225.00
5.00
17.44
4.88
170.54
429.02
92.97
80,00
69.50
1,188.00
248.62
410.19
74.52
75.00
91.09
37.49
22.50
8.15
116.94
100,10
196.00
119.53
172.80
2,217.89
169.00
263.00
260.00
10.50
42.00
20.54
12,86
CHECK
AMOUNT
189.41
8~.13
247.44
697.41
80.00
69.50
2,147.41
8.15
217.04
196.00
119.53
172.80
2,217.89
VC/JCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA r 5
11/17/94 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NLe~BER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
/~q(3(JNT
21052 11/17/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001'162-999-5214
105.62
883.52
21053 11/17/94 001251 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO., UNIFORM PATCHES FOR GLORIA 001-170-999-5245
21054 11/17/94 001653 ~ILER,S SOFTWARE ACCIJtt~ZL AUTO-UPDATE 320-199-999-5211
21054 11/17/94 001653 NAILER'S SOFTWARE MAILER,S+4 320-199-999-5211
21054 11/17/94 001653 NA[LER'S SOFTWARE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5211
21054 11/17/94 001653 NAILER~S SOFTWARE TAX 320-199-999-5211
74.89
199.00
49.00
8.00
17.98
74.89
27'3.98
21055 11/17/94 001574 MARGARITA VILLAGE RET C RETENTION M4T FON TP. RFFIC SIGN 100-2035
977.15
977.15
21056 11/17/94 NAYORS & COUNCILMEMBERS ,25 OVERRIDE PER PERSON 001-100-999-5258
13.00
13.00
21057 11/17/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES
21057 11/17/94 001526 MICHAELS STORES, INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES
190-182-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
54.93
78.25
133.18
21058 11/17/94 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
21058 11/17/94 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
21058 11/17/94 000883 MQNTELEONE EXCAVATING
21058 11/17/94 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
21059 11/17/94 001214 MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO
JEDEDIAH SMITH CHANNEL CLEAN 100-164-601-5401
MOTORGRADE FOR FiRE BREAK 100-164-601-5401
JEDEDIAB SMITH CHANNEL: 100-164-601-5401
VALLEGO CHANNEL: JOB #94-95-14 100-164-601-5401
DEPOSIT FOR PARADE SOUND & EQU 190-183-999-5370
520.00
768.00
6,930.00
9,460.00
200.00
17,678.00
21060 11/17/94 001200 N P E L R A 1995 MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-150-999-5226
160.00
160.00
21061 11/17/94 001663 NATIONAL ASSOC. OF PURC MEMBERSHIP TO PURCHASING ASSOC 001-140-999-5226
140.00
140.00
21062 11/17/94 001025 NATIONAL BUSINESS~ONAN' WKSHP iMAGE & COMMUNICATIONS 001-140-999-5258
158.00
158.00
21063 11/17/94 001394 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212
21063 11/17/94 001394 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212
2106/+ 11/17/94 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 1500 LASER FED CHECKS 001-140-999-5222
21064 11/17/94 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM ART~R3RK 001-140-999-5222
2106/. 11/17/94 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222
21064 11/17/94 00158/+ NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM TAX 001-140-999-5222
21064 11/17/94 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM OVERCHARGED PER PO QUOTE 001-140-999-5222
21064 11/17/94 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222
21064 11/17/94 00158~ NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM TAX 001-140-999-5222
953.77
76.11
348,74
95.00
4.99
34.39
45.00-
4.99-
7.36-
1,029.88
425.77
21065 11/17/94 OLSON, LAURETTA
21066 11/17/94 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS
REIMS. FOR CURTAINS FOR SR. CN
PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
190-181-999-5301
190-183J~9-5330
001-2130
001-2390
100-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
53.23
193.20
43.06
12,212.82
2,262.72
108.8~
2°608.93
87.47
99.78
53.23
193.20
V '2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE 6
I ,4 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NLINBER NAME DESCRIPTION
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESw RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEESw RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002/,6 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PENS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
21067 11/17/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESw RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
193-2190
280-2390
300-2390
320*2390
330-2390
340-Z~90
001-2390
100-2190
165-2190
190-2190
191-2190
192 - 2]90
193-2~90
280-2190
300 - 2]90
320-2~90
330-2390
340-2190
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-120-~-5225
^'~8 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB, 001-163-~-5268
I 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE1NB. 2]0-1~9-999-5228
~8 tl/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]MB. 001-162-999-5220
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-181-999-5301
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE1MB. 001-140-99<)-5260
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-150-999-5260
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB. 100-16/,-602-5260
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-181-999-5301
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-183-999-5340
21068 11/17/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-183-999-5320
21069 11/17/94 000580 PHOTO WORKS
21070 11/17/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
21071 11/17/94 000981 R H F INC.
21072 11/17/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
21072 11/17/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
21072 11/17/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
FILM DEVELOPING*GOLF TSURNANEN
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
REPAIR TO RADAR SYSTEM
BLUEPRINTS P~4-03 WINCHESTER
BLUEPRINTS P~4-08 PALA RD
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION P~3-10
WATER SERVICE FOR 9/15-10/17/9
WATER SERVICE FOR 9/15-10/17/9
WATER SERVICE FOR 9/15-10/17/9
CAR WASH & NAINT, FOR LAND DEV
CAR WASH & MAINT, FOR C]P
CAR WASH & NAINT, FOR B & S
CAR WASH & NAINT,
CAR WASH & NAINT,
2107'~ 11/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
2107'~ 11/17/94 000262 NANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
21073 11/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
21074 11/17/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
21074 11/17/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
21074 11/17/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
21074 11/17/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
74 11/17/94 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
190-183-999-5320
001-150-999-5254
001-170-999-5214
210-165-641-5802
210-165-652-5802
210-165-642-5804
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999~5240
193-180-999-5240
001-163-999-5214
001-165-9~9-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-110-999-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
316.46
61.17
106.84
268.21
121.11
301.05
58.88
10.78
.37
12.51
.42
.93
1.44
.19
.46
.93
.93
2.00
25.00
32.33
14.52
40.93
17.23
30.00
4.80
15.00
42.72
20.65
18.67
26.14
94.~
29.09
19.40
51.72
223.52
86.77
1,380.32
20.00
4.00
12.00
67.85
15.92
CHECK
AMOUNT
18,688.30
261.85
26.14
94.44
I00.Zl
1,690.61
119.T/
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA ,7
11/17/94 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]OOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE
21075 11/17/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
21075 11/17/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
21076 11/17/94 000266 RIGHTWAY
21077 11/17/94 000411 RIVERSIDE CO, FLOOD CON
Z1078 11/17/94 000459 RUFF & TUMBLE
21079 11/17/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
21079 11/17/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
21079 11/17/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
21079 11/17/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
21079 11/17/94 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
21080 11/17/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
21081 11/17/94 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POUL & SPA
21082 11/17/94 SIMENS, ARLENE M.
21083 11/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
21083 11/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
21083 11/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
21084 11/17/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
21084 11/17/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
21084 11/17/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN C..~LIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN ~LIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21085 11/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN C~LIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AICUNT
NISC. SUPPLIES ' SR CENTER
MISC SUPPLIES FOR SENION CTR
190-181-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
PORTABLE TOILET FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-52~8
MISTAKENLY CUT TO THE CITY 001-1990
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-18]-999-5330
FUEL EXPENSE - CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE ' CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE - CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE - CITY VEH/CLES
FUEL EXPENSE - CITY VEHICLES
001-162-999-526~
001-165-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
100-164-601-526~
190-180-999-526~
RECYCLE PAINT FOR GRAFFITI REM 100-16~-601-5218
P~L ~INTENANCE SERVICES 190-180-999-5212
REFUND-DUPLICATE APPLICATION 001-199-4056
BUSINESS CARDS FOR MJM,KL,MW
BUSINESS CARDS FOR MJM,KL,M~
NUSINESS CARDS FOR MJM,KL,ffi4
100-164-604-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
PEST CONTROL-CITY HALL
PEST CONTROL-OLD CITY HALL
PEST CONTROL'SENIOR CENTER
340-199-999-5250
340-199-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
43-77-077-5200-01 8/1-8/31/94 192-180-999-5319
43-77-077-5200-01 8/22-9/30/94 192-180-999-5319
43-7'~-077-5209-03 OEBIT ADJUST 192-180-999-5319
43-77-077-5209-03 9/30-10/31
43-77-077-5600-01 8/1-8/31/94
43-77-077-5600-01 9/1-9/30/94
53-77-800-1403-01 10/3-11/3
53-77-850-2948-01 10/3-11/3
56-77-755-0157-01 10/6-11/5
56-77-755-0169-01 10/6-11/5
192-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
ELECT. SERVICE FOR 9/30-10/31/19t-180-999-5319
909 Z02-4204 WE
909 202-4751 TS
909 202-4753 BH
909 202-4754 KH
909 202-4755 CITY VAN
909 202-4756 UNASSIGNED
909 202-4757 JG
909 202-4758 RR
909 202-4759 TE
909 202-4760 JH
320-199-999-5208
100-16~-604-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190o180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
I00-16~-603-5208
67.91
99.29
57.39
200.00
748.80
97.95
50.03
85.78
286.96
99.14
21.55
305.20
35.00
30.00
30.00
93,41
21.00
21.00
29.00
11,898.8(>
20,484.44
28.37
18.73
5,792.47
6,255.43
35.26
45.78
227.97
60.39
1,041.00
36.~4
1.8~
8.51
7~.72
63.34
36.34
45.14
77.10
46.97
78.10
167.20
57,39
200.00
748.80
619.86
21.55
305.20
35.00
153.41
71.00
45,888.70
V ~2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
~ /4 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIQOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4761 $M
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4762 RP
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4764 BB
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4765 BB
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4769 JS
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPBON 909 202-4770 RB
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-5153 GY
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-4070 MJM
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-205-7826 GR
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON CELLULAR TELEPHONE
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON BATTERY CNARGER/CORDITiONER
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON BATTERY EXTENDED LIFE
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON POi4ER ADAPTER CORD
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON REPLACEMENT BATTERY
21086 11/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON TAX
21087 11/17/94 STERN, DiCK
21088 11/17/94 000521 STEWART, BRUCE M.
~q89 11/17/94 001497 T R W ' INFORHATIOR SER
SR CNTR HOLIDAY ENTERTAINMENT
CONTRACT SERViCE/BRUCE STEMART
RDA LOAN CREDIT CHECKS
/0 11/17/94 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-601-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-110-~-5208
001-150-q~-5208
001-110-~-5208
001-140-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~99'5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-~99-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-q~-5208
190-181-~-5301
001-162-~-5250
280-199-~-5250
190-181-~-5301
21091 11/17/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. BRASS CARD CASES CUMMISS%ONERS 001-100-999-5265
21091 11/17/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. ENGRAVING 001-100-999-5265
21091 11/17/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TAX 001-100-999-5265
21091 11/17/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TROPHIES 190-182°999-5301
TCSD MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
PARK FACiLiTY MAINT/REPAIR
REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT
SOUND FOR HAUNTED HOUSE
21092 11/17/94 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
21092 11/17/94 000306 TENECULA VALLEY PIPE &
21093 11/17/94 THO~ASo HOWARD
21093 11/17/94 THONASo HO~JARD
21094 11/17/94 000668 TIMMY D. PROUUCTXONS
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBBCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP
21095 11/17/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CUMP
21096 11/17/94 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
21096 11/17/94 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RET[R
21096 11/17/94 000389 U S C N/PEBSCO (ONRA) 000389 PT RETIR
1~H)-180-999-5212
190-180-g99-5212
190-183-4g~0
190-2900
190-183-999-5570
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
Z1097 11/17/94 001565 U S I LAMINATION POUCHES LTR SIZE 330-199-999-5220
97 11/17/94 001565 U S I FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220
~7 11/17/94 001565 U S I TAX 330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
196.35
88.71
88.96
50.45
49.7'9
58.03
67.65
150.86
41.95
150.00
49.00
67.00
25.00
48.00
26.27
100.00
]90.00
50,00
96,94
263.25
132.00
30.64
101.61
128.44
131.56
30.00
100.00
125.00
2,448.90
188.44
271.50
4.99
312,50
50.00
289.44
100.50
322.20
60.22
11.79
4.67
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,631.42
100.00
390.00
50.00
96.94
527.50
280.00
130.00
125.00
3,276.33
712.14
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 9
11/17/94 13:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[DOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
21098
21098
21098
21098
21099
Z1099
21099
21099
21099
21100
21101
21102
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
11/17/94
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
000325 UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UU
000325 UNITED UAY OF THE INLAB 000325 tJU
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
000348 ZIGLER, GAIL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
UNIFORMS NAINT. FOR PW I00-16~-601-5243
UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR TCSO 190-180-999-5243
UNIFORM MAINTENANCE FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5243
FLOOR MAT RENT/CLEAN-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250
FLOOR MAT RENTAL/CLEAN-SR CNT 190-181-999-5250
PUBLICATION CA CD AN V57A&58 001-120-999-5228
METER USAGE AT .O065/COPY $30-199-999-5239
8 CENTERPIECES FOR CONFERENCE 001-100-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
63.84
10.06
17.00
,60
23.00
16.35
16.35
30.75
16.75
46.35
1,114.76
64.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
91.50
103.20
46.35
1,114.76
64.00
TOTAL CHECKS
153,823,86
Vr ? CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE
1', ~ 15:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FO~ ALL PERInnS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LCN/Nnn SET ASIDE
190 COHNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
220 HARGARITA ROAD REINB DIST
REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
ANOUNT
47,052.27
16,324.83
5,241.17
23,933.~7
474.97
16,268.86
126,469.53
12,751.09
139#~8.74
2~179.00
1o002.08
2~441.29
TOTAL 393,807.60
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 1
11/17/94 15:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VCXJCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
21106 11/29/94
21107 11/29/94
21108 11/29/94
21108 11/29/94
21108 11/29/94
21109 11/29/94
21109 11/29/94
21109 11/29/94
21109 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21110 11/29/94
21111 11/29/94
21111 11/29/94
21112 11/29/94
21112 11/29/94
21113 11/29/94
21113 11/29/94
21114 11/29/94
21114 11/29/94
21114 11/29/94
21115 11/29/94
21116 11/29/94
21117 11/29/94
21118 11/29/94
21119 11/29/94
21119 11/29/94
21120 11/29/94
21121 11/29/94
VENDOR ITEM ACCOONT
N~J4E DESCRIPTION NUMBER
001044 BAILY VINEYARD & WINERY DINNER FOR SISTER CITY
001-100-999-5Z58
001168 BANK OF AMERICA
ADMIN FEES/TCSD PROJ SERIES 92 390-199-999-5227
001516 BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIAT
001516 BARTON*ABCHMAN ASSOCIAT
001516 BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIAT
OLD TOWN TEMECULA TRAFFIC STUD 280-199-999-5248
OLD TOWN TEMECULA TIL~FFIC STUD 280-199-999-5248
OLD TOWN TEMECULA TRAFFIC STUD 280-1270
000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AT C.R.C 190-182-999-5415
MEDIAN SERVICE AREA 191-180-999-5415
NEIGNBORHO00 PARK NAINT 190-180-999-5415
LANOSCAPE MAINT/SENIOR CNTR 190-181-999-5415
000447 COMTRONIX OF HENET
000447 CONTRORIX OF HENET
000447 CONTRORIX OF HENET
000447 COMTRONIX OF HENET
000447 COMTRONIX OF HENET
000447 COMTRONIX OF HENET
000447 COMTRONIX OF HENET
000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET
000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET
RADIOS MAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS MAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS MAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/S
RADIOS HAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS MAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS HAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS HAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/~
RADIOS HAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
RADIOS HAINT CONTRACT 11/1-4/3
001-100-999-5250
001-171-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
100-164-604-5250
100-164-601-5250
001-16~-999-5Z50
001-165-999-5250
001-162-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC PROF. SERVICES FOR OCTOBER 94 001-162-~9-5250
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC PO IS FULLY UTILIZED 001-162-999-5250
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
LANDSCAPE REVIEWS
LANDSCAPE REVIEWS
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5250
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
PLAN CHECK SERVICES-SEPT 94 001-162-999-5248
INCORRECTLY BILLED PC#94-2013 001-162-999-5248
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
PYNT REDUCTION-WORK NOT DONE
SLOPE MAINT FOR NOV. 94
SPTS PRK HAINT FOR NOV 94
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
000202 J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES DESIGN SPRTS PARK FOR OCT 94 210-190-137-5802
001192 K L M ENGINEERING
FRONT ST CURB & GUTTER REPAIR 100-164-601-5402
001349 KANE, BALLHER & BERKHAN PROF. SERVICES FOR OCTOBER 94 280-199-999-5246
001637 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES INTERIM PW DIR THRU 11/4
100-164-604-5250
001567 MALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO CONSTRUCTION DRAW-OCTOBER 94 210-190-136-5804
001567 MALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO RETENTION-INV. 003 210-2035
000217 HARDARITA OFFICIALS ASS SOFTBALL OFFICIALS FEES
190-183-999-5380
001574 MARGARITA VILLAGE RET C RETENTION PMT FOR HARG VILLAGE 220-165-610-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,413.60
2,441.29
1,859.99
5,000.00
6,859.99
1,619.00
474.97
12,471.36
175.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
2~415.60
2,441.29
13,719.98
14,740.33
168.00
252.00
474.00
292.50
544.50
195.00
97.50
753,00
474.00 ? ~0
6,039.D0
4,082.00- 1,957.00
1,615.00
3,665.00 5,280.00
21,175.16
83.20- 21,091.96
1,112.40'
17,381.26
6,877.81
2,266.48
2,411.92
2,895.60
6,400.00
16,851.22
1,685.12-
2,316.60
12,751.09
23,146.67
2,266.48
2,411.92
2,895.60
6,400.00
15,166.10
2,316.60
12 q9
Vr '2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
1 4 15:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
21122
21122
21123
21124
21124
21125
21125
21126
21126
21127
21127
21127
21127
21128
21130
21130
21130
21131
21132
21132
CHECK
DATE
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29194
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
11/29/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001207
001207
000883
000240
000240
001383
001383
001264
001264
0007~
000793
000793
000793
000285
000285
001660
000332
000332
000332
000539
000345
000345
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
HARTIN d. JASKA, INC.
HARTIN J. JASXA, INC.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
SERV[CE FROM 9/30-10/31/94
RETENTION-DNj~W 003
MOVING MATERIAL STOCKPILES
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING REMOVE 81 DIKE LANE lIARKINGS
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ROAD 8TRIPING-DIAZ ROAD
P N W ASSOCIATES
P N W ASSOCIATES
EXTEND CONTRACT THRU 7/31195.
EXTEND CONTP. ACT THRU 7/31/95.
PRICE COSTCO
PRICE COSTCO
1ST YR PNT PER OWNER PART]C]PA
1ST YR PNT PER INNER PART/C/PA
SCANTRON CORPORATION
SCANTRON CORPORATION
SCANTRON CORPORATION
SCANTRON CORPORATION
INSPECT]ON REQEST FORMS
~L~NDLING CHARGES
FREIGHT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-1Z0-5804
210-2035
210-190-120-5804
100-164-601-5410
100-164-602-5410
165-1~-~-5248
280-1~9-9~-5248
280-1~9-~-5276
280-2030
001-162-~-5222
001-162-~-5ZZ2
001-162-999-5222
001-162-~-5222
SIR SPEEDY BUSINESS LICENSE CERTIFICATES 001-140-~99-5222
SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-140-~-5222
STEIN, JONATHAN A., ESQ NURR CRK LITIGATION COPY REIMB
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI PLAN CHECK SERVICES-SEPT 1994
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI PLAN CHECK SERVICES
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI PLAN CHECK SERVICES-OCTOBER 94
WIMMER YAMADA ASSOCIATE RESTROOM & SE~R DESIGN
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX 5100 TONER (DRY INK)
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX
300-199-999-5207
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-162-~9-5248
210-190-120-5802
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
118,000.00
11,800.00-
1,000.00
2,430.00
4,245.91
5,241.17
5,241.16
7,430.96
110,381.04
1,434.97
3.20
41.03
111.46
1,130.93
87.65
2,17~.00
1,419.26
5,415.88
4,725.83
1,836.95
930.00
72.08
CHECK
AMOUNT
106,200.00
1,000.00
6,675.91
10,482.33
117,812.00
1,590.66
1,218.58
2,179.00
11,560.97
1,8~6.95
1,002.08
TOTAL CHECKS 393,807,60
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
NEW BUSINESS
Presentations to Councilmember Birdsall
Temecula Town Association
Riverside County Fire Department
Temecula Police Department
Joan Sparkman & Ron Sullivan on behalf of
Senator Marian Bergeson
Aggie Goodacre on behalf of Congressman Ken Calvert
Mayor Roberts on behalf of the City Council
A. Resolution Certifvino Election Results
RECOMMENDATION:
A.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, RECITING
THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER B,
1994, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY
LAW
A.2 Administration of Oath of Office.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and flied with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
ITEM 8
ITEM 4
APPROVA~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Interim Finance Officer
November 29, 1994
Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1994 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months
Ended September 30, 1994.
PREPARED BY: ;/~'~Tim McDermott, Interim Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement
of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended
September 30, 1994.
Appropriate $45,000 to Building & Safety Department account 001-162-999-5248
"Consulting Services".
DISCUSSION:
The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the three
months ended September 30, 1994. Please see the attached financial statements for
analytical review of financial activity.
e
The Building and Safety Department has experienced an unexpected increase in plan
check activity since the beginning of the 1994-95 fiscal year. This increase in activity
is compounded by the International Rectifier project. As such, the consulting services
line item has been heavily impacted. The amount paid to outside consultants for plan
check services is directly related to the revenue received for plan check services.
Therefore, an additional appropriation in the amount of $45,000is necessary to cover
the cost of plan review services for the remainder of the fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT: As is reflected by the attached financial statements, adequate General
Fund reserves are available at September 30, 1994 for the $45,000 additional appropriation
being requested.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1994
Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of
September 30, 1994
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained
Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1994
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Agreement - City of Temecula/Eastern Municipal Water District for
Construction of Sanitary Sewer - Solana - I-15
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached agreement, authorize the Mayor to sign it and
direct the City Clerk to forward the executed agreement to Eastern Municipal Water District
(EMWD).
BACKGROUND:
At their regular meeting of October 18, 1994, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign an
agreement between the City of Temecula and EMWD in the form of a letter and based on the
staff report which described obligation of each agency with respect to completion of the
project. A copy of the staff report and the agreement letter as approved by the City Council
at that meeting is attached.
Subsequently, I requested that the Conditions of Approval of the agreement as outlined in my
staff report be incorporated into a formal agreement. Such formal agreement was prepared
by EMWD, presented to and approved by the Board of Directors at their regular meeting of
November 16, 1994.
This agreement is being presented to this City Council for your formal approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
CFD No. 88-12 has allocated funds for several projects in that district. Sanitary sewers
discussed herein is one of these projects. Sufficient funds are available through CFD 88-12
budget to provide the required $307,285.00 for the project. CFD 88-12 Sanitary Sewer
budget originally was $246,000, Balance is made up from the savings from Landscaping
Project. Therefore, adequate funding is available for the total project costs.
r:\agdrpt\94\1129~emwdagr.ss 11/17 skg
k- s 7/4/
November 16, 1994
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
General Manager
SUBJECT:
Approve and Authorize an Agreement between the City of
Temecula and Eastern Municipal Water District
Regarding Solana Way Sewer Installation
BACKGROUND
In 1989, the Riverside County Supervisors approvedthe formation of
CFD No. 88-12 to provide for the construction of public facilities
including certain sewer pipelines. On April 1, 1992, a Joint
Financing and Acquisition Agreement was executed with the District
which specified the details associated with the acquisition and
construction of said sewer pipelines.
The facilities to be constructed under the agreement have not all
been built, and capacity in an existing 8-inch sewer pipeline south
of Solana Way is now exceeded. The City of Temecula has requested
the District to prepare the plans and construct the CFD No. 88-12
sanitary sewer system from Ynez Road and Solana Way westerly under
1-15 as shown on the map displayed.
As provided for in the Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement,
the City has certain responsibilities associated with the design
and construction of the District facilities which they are desirous
of delegating to the District. Specifically, the District will:
Design the project, either by attaining the services of an outside
engineering firm or utilizing District staff; solicit bids, award
and administer construction contracts; and obtain required permits,
easements or right-of-ways.
The District has prepared cost estimates to design and construct
the facilities for the minimum required 15-inch diameter sewer
pipeline and a 24-inch master-planned sewer pipeline. The
estimated cost for the 15-inch sewer pipeline is $294,000.00 and
$359,000.00 for the 24-inch sewer pipeline. Should the District
elect to construct the 24-inch master-planned pipeline, the
District will pay for the oversizing.
Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacimo, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jadnto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hemet, CA
Board of Directors
November 16, 1994
Page 2
CFD No. 88-12 has a budget allocation of $307,285.00 for the design
and construction of the 15-inch sewer pipeline. It is anticipated
this sum will meet all costs associated with design and
construction of the 15-inch sewer pipeline. Any additional funding
required for the 24-inch oversizing or project overruns will be
paid by the District.
This project is needed by the District to alleviate pressure on the
existing s-inch sewer pipeline and allow for continued development
east of the 1-15 in the Temecula area.
RECOMMENDATION
In view of the foregoing, I wish to recommend that your Honorable
Board, by Minute Order, approve and authorize the:
General Manager to execute an agreement between the City of
Temecula and the District; and
Appropriation of $52,000.00 to cover the estimated costs of
oversizing the proposed sewer pipeline from Improvement
District No. U-8 (Rancho California) Construction Funds.
Respect fully,
hn B Brudin
Manager
Attachments
Financ~_~
urchasing/con=racte~J, . ~
Prepared by:
"'~oite Rugge
Acting Assistant General
Manager, Engineering
JOp:slh
wp21_solana
AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SOLANA WAY RELIEF SEWERLINE
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 199__, by and between EASTERNMUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to
Division 20 of the California Water Code (hereinafter "EMWD") and
the CITY OF TEMECULA, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter
"City").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside
adopted Resolution No. 89-449 on September 26, 1989 completing
proceedings for the formation of CFD No. 88-12 to provide financing
for the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities
which include certain sewer facilities (hereinafter EMWD
Facilities) to be owned and maintained by EMWD.
WHEREAS, in November of 1989 the registered voters living within
the proposed boundaries of the City of Temecula voted to
incorporate and the following year adopted a resolution authorizing
bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or construction of the CFD
No. 88-12 public facilities.
WHEREAS, Tomond Properties constructed certain of the EMWD
Facilities that subsequently were acquired through the sale of the
CFD No. 88-12 bonds.
WHEREAS, on April 1, 1992, a Joint Financing and Acquisition
Agreement was executed among Community Facilities District No.
88-12 of the County of Riverside, Eastern Municipal Water District,
the City of Temecula and Tomond Properties setting forth the
details associated with the acquisition and construction of the
EMWD Facilities.
WHEREAS, the EMWD Facilities to be constructed under the April 1,
1992 Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement have not been built
and capacity in the existing 8" sewer pipeline south of Solana Way
is now exceeded.
WHEREAS, since time is of the essence, City has requested EMWD to
prepare the plans and construct the CFD No. 88-12 sanitary sewer
system from Ynez Road and Solana Way westerly under 1-15 as shown
on the map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recited premises
together with the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
Page 1
DeleGation of Citv's Responsibilities. As provided for in the
Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement, City has certain
responsibilities associated with the design and construction
of the EMWD Facilities which City hereby delegates to EMWD:
Pro~ect DesiGn. EMWD shall retain the services of a
registered and licensed civil engineering firm(s) to
design and prepare detailed bid documents, construction
plans and specifications for the EMWD Facilities to be
constructed.
Solicitation of Bids, Award and Administration of
Construction Contracts. All contracts for the
construction of said EMWDFacilities, including, but not
limited to, staking, inspection, surveying and compaction
testing, shall be solicited, awarded and administered by
EMWD as a public works project consistent with the
applicable sections of the California Public Contracts
Code.
State HiGhwav and Citv Road Department Construction and
ODerate and Maintain Permits. EMW]D shall be responsible
for obtaining a construction permit from the appropriate
governmental agency covering the construction and
installation of the EMWD Facilities. All costs
associated with acquiring the permits shall be reimbursed
to EMWD by CFD No. 88-12.
Easements and Ri~hts-of-WaVs. EMWD shall be responsible
to acquire any easements and rights-of-ways necessary for
those portions, if any, of the EMW1DFacilities which are
to be constructed within and across private property.
All costs associated with acquiring easements and rights-
of-ways shall be reimbursed to EMWD by CFD No. 88-12.
Construction Cost Estimates. EMWD has prepared cost
estimates, attached hereto as Exhibits B-1 and B-2, to design
and construct the EMWD Facilities for the minimum required
15-inch diameter pipeline ($294,000) and a 24-inch oversized
diameter pipeline ($359,000) that will ultimately be required
to provide service for the tributary area.
Bid ODtions. EMWD shall solicit and receive alternate bids
for the 15-inch minimum and 24-inch master planned pipeline.
Costs to be Paid by EMWD/CFD No. 88-12. Should EMWDdecide to
construct the 24-inch master planned pipeline, EMWD will pay
CFD No. 88-12 an amount equal to the difference in cost of
oversizing the system from !5-inches to the 24-inches based on
the alternate bids received from the lowest responsible
Page 2
bidder.
CFD No. 88-12 has allocated funds in the amount of $307,285
for the design and construction of the minimum required
15-inch diameter pipeline. This amount includes, but may not
be limited to, construction and engineering costs, plan check
fees, construction management, inspection fees, administrative
costs, surveys, and soils testing.
Notwithstanding the above, EMWD agrees to pay all project
costs in excess of CFD No. 88-12's $307,285 available funding
plus EMWD's oversizing contribution, if relevant.
Captions. Captions are for convenience purposes only and are
not part of this Agreement.
Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or
unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this
Agreement and the remaining parts shall remain in full force
and effect.
Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.
Entire A~reement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the matters
provided herein. All other provisions of the April 1, 1992,
a Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
By:
Mary C. White,
Secretary
John B.
Dated:
Brudin,
General Manager
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Dated:
Mayor
Page 3
October 4, 1994
Sol.-n Wa Relief Sewerline
~st Es~m~te
ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATIC~I & CONSTRUCT.SERVICES
1. 800 LF of15" PVC sewer pipeline @ $40.00/ft ...... $32,000.00
2. 3- 48" DIA. manhole @ $1,800~00/ea ................ $ 5,400.00
3. Ties into existing two manhole @ $1,500.00/ea ..... $ 3,000.00
4. Rechannel existing two manholes @ $1,900.00/ea .... $ 3,800.00
5. B & J 350 LF of 36" steel casing @ $360.00/ft .... $126,000.00
6. T.v. Sewer @ $0.50/ft ............................. $ 375.00
7. Min. 370 ft X 30 ft easement ...................... $18,000.00
8. Bore Pits at lump sum price of .................... $20,000.00
SUB-TOTAL $209,000.00
5% CONTINGENCIES $11,000.00
$74,000.00
TOTAL $294,000.00
EXHIBIT B-1
Wa Rel ee Se e:l ue
October 4, 1994
1. 800 LF of 24" PVC sewer pipeline @ $65.00/ft ...... $52,000.00
2. 3- 48" DIA. manhole @ $1,800r00/ea ................ $ 5,400.00
3- Ties into existing two manhole @ $1,500.00/ea ..... $ 3,000.00
4. Rechannel existing two manholes @ $1,900.00/ea .... $ 3,800.00
5. B & J 350 LF of 48" steel casing @ $480.00/ft .... $168,000.00
6. T.v. Sewer @ $0.50/ft ............................. $ 375.00
7. Min. 370 ft X 30 ft easement ...................... $18,000.00
8. Bore Pits @ lump sum price of ..................... $20,000.00
SUB-TOTAL
5% CONTINGENCIES
ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATION/CONSTRUCT. SERVICES
$271,000.00
$14,000.00
$74,000.00
$359,000.00
EXHIBIT B-2
AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SOLANA WAY RELIEF SEWERLIE
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 199__, by and between EASTER/qMUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to
Division 20 of the California Water Code (hereinafter "EMWD") and
the CITY OF TEMECDIa~, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter
"City").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside
adopted Resolution No. 89-449 on September 26, 1989 completing
proceedings for the formation of CFD No. 88-12 to provide financing
for the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities
which include certain sewer facilities (hereinafter EMWD
Facilities} to be owned and maintained by EMWD.
WHEREAS, in November of 1989 the registered voters living within
the proposed boundaries of the City of Temecula voted to
incorporate and the following year adopted a resolution authorizing
bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or construction of the CFD
No. 88-12 public facilities.
WHEREAS, Tomond Properties constructed certain of the EMWD
Facilities that subsequently were acquired through the sale of the
CFD No. 88-12 bonds.
WHEREAS, on April 1, 1992, a Joint Financing and Acquisition
Agreement was executed among Community Facilities District No.
88-12 of the County of Riverside, Eastern Municipal Water District,
the City of Temecula and Tomond Properties setting forth the
details associated with the acquisition and construction of the
EMWD Facilities.
WHEREAS, the EMWD Facilities to be constructed under the April 1,
1992 Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement have not been built
and capacity in the existing 8" sewer pipeline south of Solana Way
is now exceeded.
WHEREAS, since time is of the essence, City has requested EMWD to
prepare the plans and construct the CFD No. 88-12 sanitary sewer
system from Ynez Road and Solana Way westerly under 1-15 as shown
on the map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
together with the mutual covenants herein
hereto agree as follows:
above recited premises
contained, the parties
Page 1
A~REEMENT
DeleGation of Citv's ResPonsibilities. As provided for in the
Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement, City has certain
responsibilities associated with the design and construction
of the EMWD Facilities which City hereby delegates to EMWD:
Proiect DesiGn. EMWD shall retain the services of a
registered and licensed civil engineering firm(s) to
design and prepare detailed bid documents, construction
plans and specifications for the EbTWD Facilities to be
constructed.
Solicitation of Bids, Award and Administration of
Construction Contracts. All contracts for the
construction of said EMWDFacilities, including, but not
limited to, staking, inspection, surveying and compaction
testing, shall be solicited, awarded and administered by
EMWD as a public works project consistent with the
applicable sections of the California Public Contracts
Code.
State HiGhway and City Road Department Construction and
Operate and Maintain Permits. EMWD shall be responsible
for obtaining a construction permit from the appropriate
governmental agency covering the construction and
installation of the EMWD Facilities. All costs
associated with acquiring the permits shall be reimbursed
to EMWD by CFD No. 88-12.
Easements and RiGhts-of-Ways. EMWD shall be responsible
to acquire any easements and rights-of-ways necessary for
those portions, if any, of the EMWD Facilities which are
to be constructed within and across private property.
All costs associated with acquiring easements and rights-
of-ways shall be reimbursed to EMWD by CFD No. 88-12.
Construction Cost Estimates. EMWD has prepared cost
estimates, attached hereto as Exhibits B-1 and B-2, to design
and construct the EMWD Facilities for the minimum required
15-inch diameter pipeline ($294,000) and a 24-inch oversized
diameter pipeline ($359,000) that will ultimately be required
to provide service for the tributary area.
Bid ODtions. EMWD shall solicit and receive alternate bids
for the 15-inch minimum and 24-inch master planned pipeline.
Costs to be Paid bv EMWD/CFD No. 88-12. Should EMWD decide to
construct the 24-inch master planned pipeline, EMWD will pay
CFD No. 88-12 an amount equal to the difference in cost of
oversizing the system from 15-inches to the 24-inches based on
the alternate bids received from the lowest- responsible
Page 2
bidder.
CFD No. 88-12 has allocated funds in the amount of $307,285
for the design and construction of the minimum required
15-inch diameter pipeline. This amount includes, but may not
be limited to, construction and engineering costs, plan check
fees, construction management, inspection fees, administrative
costs, surveys, and soils testing.
Notwithstanding the above, EMWD agrees to pay all project
costs in excess of CFD No. 88-12's $307,285 available funding
plus EMWD's oversizing contribution, if relevant.
Captions. Captions are for convenience purposes only and are
not part of this Agreement.
Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or
unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this
Agreement and the remaining parts shall remain in full force
and effect.
Successors and Assiqns. This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.
Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the matters
provided herein. All other provisions of the April 1, 1992,
a Joint Financing and Acquisition Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
By:
Mary C. White, Secretary
John B. Brudin,
Dated:
General Manager
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Dated:
, Mayor
Page 3
//
sswe~l
October 4, 1994
Solaria Wa Relief Sewerline
~aVos~ Estimate
1. 800 LF of15" PVC sewer pip@line @ $40.00/ft ...... $32,000.00
2. 3- 48" DIA. manhole @ $1,800~00/ea ................ $ 5,400.00
3. Ties into existing two manhole @ $1,500.00/ea ..... $ 3,000.00
4. Rechannel existing two manholes @ $1,900.00/ea .... $ 3,800.00
5. B & J 350 LF of 36" steel casing @ $360.00/ft .... $126,000.00
6. T.v. Sewer @ $0.50/ft ............................. $ 375.00
7. Min. 370 ft X 30 ft easement ...................... $18,000.00
8. Bore Pits at lump sum price of .................... $20,000.00
ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATI~4 & CONSTRUCT.SERVICES
SUB-TOTAL $209,000.00
5% CONTINGENCIES $11,000.00
$74,000.00
TOTAL $294,000.00
EXHIBIT B-1
Sol~-~ Way Relief Sewerline
Cost ~-s~imate
October 4, 1994
1. 800 LF of 24" PVC sewer pipeline @ $65.00/ft ...... $52,000.00
2. 3- 48" DIA. manhole @ $1,800~00/ea ................ $ 5,400.00
3. Ties into existing two manhole @ $1,500.00/ea ..... $ 3,000.00
4. Rechannel existing two manholes @ $1,900.00/ea .... $ 3,800.00
5. B & J 350 LF of 48" steel casing @ $480.00/ft .... $168,000.00
6. T.v. Sewer @ $0.50/ft ........................ $ 375.00
7. Min. 370 ft X 30 ft easement ...................... $18,000.00
8. Bore Pits @ lump sum price of ..................... $20,000.00
SUB-TOTAL
5% CONTINGENCIES
ENGINR~F-~/NG/ADMINISTRATION/CONSTRUCT. SERVICES
TOTAL
$271,000.00
$14,000.00
$74,000.00
$359,000.00
EXHIBIT 8-2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kiosk, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 18, 1994
Sanitary Sewer - Solarm Way/I-15 Crossing
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement authorizing Eastern Municipal
Water Distric~ (EMWO) to proceed with design and constTuction of Solarm Way/I-15 Sewer
Pipeline Crossing.
BACKGROUND:
On April 1, 1992, CFD NO. 88-12, Eastern Municipal Water District, Tomond Properties, a
California general partnership, and the City of Ternsouls entered into an agreement to
construct a sanitary sewer system, from Ynez Road and Solaria Way westerly under I-15, to
13rovide service to that area.
The capacity in the existing 8" sewer line, south of Solarm Way, is now exceeded. The
minimum line required to provide capacity for CFD No. 88-12 in that area is 15" diameter.
EMWD's master plan of sewers indicates that 24" diameter will be ultimately required to
provide service to that tributary area.
EMWD has proposed the following:
1. That EMWD would design or have designed by others the system described.
That EMWD would review plans prepared by others and process the plans for
review end permits through Caitrens for the 1-215 crossing,
-1- r:igtlrptW4~1018~eewer
h,astern IVAunicipal ~ ar~r District
Redwine Iml She,ll
Chester C. ~
Rogers M. ~ox
Mr. Joe Keysack
Acting Director of Public Works
crrY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temccula, CA 92590
October 7, 1994
Ik4mW~V. As~leV
Ibdem'D. Siems
IIk~ed R. M
Ik4e~ C. White
Dear Mr. Keysack:
SIrEJECT: CFD 88-12, Selana Waya-lS Sewer Pipellne Cros~inE
In response to MAr. Tim D. Serlet's August 16, 1994, letter requesting our District W
prepare the plans and conslruct the sewer pipeline crossing the 1-15 freeway at Solana
Way, we have prepared an estimate to design and construct a 1S-inch {minimum required)
or a 24-inch {master planned) sewer pipeline.
Thc estimated cost to build the minimum required IS-inch sewer pipeline (w relieve the
8-inch sewer pipeline south of Solana Way) is $294,000.00, and the estimated cost w
build the master pined sewer pipeline at this location is $359,000.00. Wc propose to
receive altcrnate bids for the 15-inch and 2d--inch pipelines. We prefer to build the
24-inch master phnned pipeline and would participate in the cost of the oversizing.
It is cstimatccl that it will take approximately ten months (see attached schedule) to
dcsign, advertise, award and construct this project. This inchdes time to obtain the
necessary permits and cascmcnts. Sincc time is of the cssencc and thcre is a neexi to
adhere to thc conditions of the April 1, 1992, Joint Financing and Acquisition, wc request
that you sign a copy of this lcucr as dcsignatcd below indicating your agrccmcnt with its
content and return it to us so we may start design.
Man To: Post Ofi'ge Box 8300 · San ~.,4,,,~.; CAiMoruia 92..QI-8300 · Teiepbooe (909) 925*7676 · Fax (909) 929-02_r7
Main OffEr. 2045 S. San Jacimo Street, San Jar.~go · Cuuomer ServkelEalineeri~ Anna: 4.40 E. Oakland Aveaue, lima, CA
City of Temec:uh
~ 88-12 ~olarm Way
October 7, 1994
Pagc 2
If you have any questions, please ~ me at (909) 925-7676, ext. 381.
Sincerely,
Manager, Engineex'ing Services
HR/HAS:cdd
Attachments
Bill Green, RBF and Associates
Chartic Bachmann
Jim Petersen
A1 Spencer
Davc Croslcy
The City of Temecula agrees to have EMWD design and combact the Solana
WayrI-15 Sewer Pipeline Crossing. We also agree to pay a total mount not to
exceed $307,285.00 in accordance with ottr letter dated August 16, 1994, for thk
project.
Signed:
Mayor, City of Temecula
5.
6.
7.
They would request bids for the construction of:
15 · diameter pipe and alternate
24" diameter pipe as reequired by mas~er plan
That appropriate casings would be provided for each alternate for I-15
crossing
That EMWD would pay the difference in cost of over-sizing from the 15"
diameter system to the required 24" diameter system,
That the costs would be 81Iotated based on the unit prices of the lowest
responsible bidder.
EMWD would assume the responsibilityfor contract administration, construction
staking and inspection.
That the total cost to CFD No. 88-12 for all of the above would not exceed
$307,285.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
CFD No. 88-12 has allocated funds for several projects in that district. Sanitary sewers
discussed herein is one of these projects. Sufficient funds are available through CFD 88-12
budget to provide the required 8307,285.00for the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Copy of letter to Mr. Hooite Rugge, EMWD
-2- r:~agc:lrpt~411018~ewer
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Acceptance of Public Street Improvements constructed under
Assessment District No. 161 (Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to
Joseph Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the public street improvements as constructed under the
Properties Ranch Assessment District No. 161, in Nicolas Road between Winchester Road
(State Highway Route No. 79 North) and Joseph Road.
BACKGROUND:
The Winchester Properties Assessment District No. 161 was formed under the provisions of
the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of
Riverside.
The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for
Assessment District No. 161 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors.
As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants
recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board.
The Board of Supervisors then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a
"Notice of Completion".
The Assessment District contractor has satisfactorily completed Nicolas Road from 100 feet
easterly of Winchester Road to 169 feet easterly of Joseph Road in accordance with County
plans, specifications, and standards. The Boid of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the
Notice of Completion of the public improve'ments on September 13, 1994. The Riverside
County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public
Works Department has reviewed the project in the field.
r:%agdrpt~94\l129~nicorded.161 11117akc
The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept
the public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibility.
The Riverside County Transportation Department previously accepted Nicolas Road from
Winchester Road to 1.92 miles easterly of Winchester Road into the County Road-Maintained
System. This portion of Nicolas Road therefore became a part of the City Maintained Street
system upon incorporation on December 1, 1989.
The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of these street and drainage
improvements as constructed under Assessment District No. 161 into the City Maintained-
street system.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these
streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years.
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated September 13, 1994
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
r:~agdrpt%94%1129\nicorded.161 11/17ekc
VI CINI T Y MAP
NOT TO SO~qLE
Location Map
ITEM 7
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Modification at the
intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street, Project No.
PW94-09
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Traffic Signal Modification at the Intersection of Rancho
California Road and Front Street, Project No. PW94-09, as complete and direct the City Clerk
to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On August 1, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the Traffic Signal Modification
at Rancho California Road and Front Street, Project No. PW94-09, to Paul Gardner Corp. for
$8,790.00. The project included the installation of new loop detectors and striping to provide
a dual left turn lane from south bound Front Street to east bound Rancho California Road. This
project encountered only one field condition that required a contract change order. This
change was due to an existing damage traffic signal conduit which was a link between the
traffic detector loop wires in the street and a pull box. The conduit was removed and replaced
for an amount of $829.09.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
pw04/r:~agdrpt\94\1129\pw94-Og.acc
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was $8,790.00. Contract Change Order No. 1 was
approved for a total amount of $829.09. The total construction cost is $9,619.09. This
project is being funded through Traffic Signal Maintenance Funds, account #100-164-602-
5405.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
pwO4/r:~agdrpt\94\ 1129\pw94-09 .acc
RECORDING REQUES'II~ BY
AND RETURN T0:
CITYCLEP. K
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174BuineeaPe~l~lve
Teamde, CA 82590
BPAC~ ABOVE THI~ UNE FOR
RECO~DER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of fie City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Paul Gardner Corp. to perform the
following work of improvement:
PW94-09, Traffic Signal Modification at Rancho Califomis Road and Front Street
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November
29, 1994. That upon said contract the Gulf Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by
the said company as required by law,
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 94-09.
6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD AND FRONT STREET.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1994.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
,1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Fonm/CIP-001 Rev. 12-591 pwO4%pw94-O9%compiern.not 112994
Signed and sealed this 32~ day of / ,19., 94
(Seal)
(Name)
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
(Name)
(Title)
(Name)
~c-Tr~7'~'
(Title)
MAINTENANCE BOND M-2 r:.~ip~roje~e~pwg4-OgV~dpkg Rev:. 03-30-94
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
APPROVAL R~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
~Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract for the Construction of Winchester Road Interim
Street Improvements, Project No. PW94-03
PREPARED BY: /~Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the base bid only, for the construction of Winchester Road Interim
Street ~mprovements, Project No. PW94-03 to Chance Edmondson for the base bid of
$241,407.57and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $24,140.76 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $63,000 from the Pavement Management
Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvement Project.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications and authorized the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Winchester Road interim
Street Improvement Project.
This project will widen the south side of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the
I-15 south bound on-ramp, which will create an exclusive east bound right turn lane onto the
south bound I-15. Also, the north side of Winchester Road will be widened to provide for a
smother transition from the south bound I-15 off-ramp going west on Winchester Road. The
existing traffic signal will be modified to provide for these widenings and the landscaping and
irrigation will be installed adjacent to the proposed street improvements. These improvements
will be constructed to their ultimate locations and no modifications will be needed during the
Winchester Road Bridge Widening project. This project was also bid with an alternative to
perform the construction during night hours, from 8:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. Sunday evenings
thru Friday mornings.
The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $230,000.00.
-1 * r:\agdrpt\94\1129\pw94-O3.awd
Two (2) bids for the project were publicly opened on November 17, 1994 and the results for
the base bid are as follows:
Alternative
Bid
1. Chance Edmondson .............. $241,407.57 $15,000.00
2. Wadeham-Bake Inc ............... $279,279.00 $75,000.00
The contractor is responsible for providing traffic control for the entire duration of the project
which will allow continuous traffic flow except during certain off peak hours to install the
traffic control and to move equipment around the site. Therefore, we recommend that the
work be performed during the day and that only the base bid be awarded.
Chance Edmondson has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other
areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 60 working days. Work is expected to begin early January,
1995 and be completed early April, 1995.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A budget transfer will be required from the Pavement Management Project (account number
210-165-655-5804)to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvement Project (account
number 210-165-641-5804). Both projects are Capital Improvement Projects to be funded
by Measure "A". Currently only $215,500 has been appropriated for the Winchester Road
Project. Savings have been identified in the Pavement Management Project (current
appropriation of $900,000) to cover the budget transfer.
-2- r:\agdrpt\94\l 129\pw94-03.ewd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW94.03
WINCHESTER ROAD INTERIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 29th day of November, 1994, by and between
the City of Temacula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Chance
Edmondson, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. P1/V94-03 WINCHES I
ROAD INII=HIM STRr. e:l IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendmentsthereto, the State of California Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. PVV94-03 WINCHESTER ROAD IN I r. HiM STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these
Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW94-03 WINCHESTER
ROAD INTERIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\eip%projecte%pw94-O3%bidpkO\ ekg
e
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, an
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTORshall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO, PW94-03
WINCHESTER ROAD IN I r, HiM STREET IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Two hundred &
forty-one thousand & four hundred & seven DOLLARS and ~;~y4even
($241,407.57),the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed dxty {60} working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as
the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer,
shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment
request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, r
any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion o,
CONTRACT CA-2 r:%cip%projecte~ow94-O3~dpkg\ skg
the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of ~75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
10.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
CONTRACT CA-3 r:%cip~oroject$~ow94-O3~bidl~g\ ekg
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies ma
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a cop~
of such wage' rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employee:
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorabL
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times b
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
CONTRACT CA4 r:%oip%projects%pw94-O3Vaidpkg\ ekg
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projecte~pw94-O3~l~dpkg\ Ikg
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip~projects~owS4-O3Widpkg\
ITEM 9
APPROVAL~
CITY ATFORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Award of Contract for the Construction of Pala Road ~ HWY 79S
Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08
PREPARED BY: f~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the base bid only, for the construction of the Pala Road @ HWY
79S Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08 to Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc.
$40,590.47 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $4,059.05 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On July 12, 1994 the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. The work to
be performed includes, construction of asphalt pavement, traffic striping and signing,
embankment construction, and traffic control to construct a right turn lane for traffic
proceeding east on Route 79 "South" to south on Pala Road. This widening project will
reduce congestion on Route 79 "South" during peak levels of traffic.
The initial bid opening for this project was on August 4, 1994 at which time only one bid was
received. This bid was 75% over the engineer's estimate of $36,000and it was recommended
that the project be re-bid. Therefore, on October 11, 1994 the City Council directed staff to
re-bid the project. Six (6) bids for the project were publicly opened on November 10, 1994
and all six were lower than the previous bid. This project was also bid with an alternative to
perform the construction during night hours, from 8:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. Sunday evenings
thru Friday mornings.
-1- r:%agdrpt%94%l 129~ow94-08 .ewd
The following are the results of the bid opening:
Base Bid Alternative
Bid
1. Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc ............ $40,590.47 $6,335.49
2. Chance Edmondson ................ $43,660.65 $4,000.00
3. Sean Malek Engr. & Constr.o Inc ....... $45,925.96 $15,000.00
4. Chino Construction ................ $48,100.70 $11,700.00
5. NPG Corporation ................. $57,958.25 $900.00
6. Kruger McGrew Construction Co ....... $60,829.00 $2,560.00
The contractor is responsible for providing traffic control for the entire duration of the project
which will allow continuous traffic flow except during certain off peak hours to install the
traffic control and to move equipment around the site. Therefore, we recommend that the
work be performed during the day and that only the base bid be awarded.
Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc. has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well
in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 25 working days. Work is expected to begin late December,
1994 and be completed in late February, 1995.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees -
Signal Mitigation. Funds are available for the construction contact and contingency amounts
of $40,590.47, and $4,059.05 respectively. The total amount of $44,649.52 has been
transferred from the Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvement Fund, and has been
appropriated in account #210-165-652-5804.
-2- r:\agdrpt~94\1129~pw94-Oa.ewd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW94.-08
PALA ROAD AND ROUTE 79 SOUTH
INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 29th day of November, 1994, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Pro-Civil
Engineering, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. RN94-08PALA ROAD AND
ROUI.- 79 SOUTH Ikl P. HIM IMPROVEMENTS Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. RN94-08 PALA ROAD AND ROU ~ ~- 79 SOUTH Ik ~ r. HIM IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of
these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-08 PALA ROAD
AND ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
CONTRACT CA-1 . r:%cip%projects%pw94-08VDidpkg ekg
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, ano
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW94-08
PALA ROAD AND ROIJ i ,: 79 SOUTH IN I r.~iM IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Forty thousand
five hundred & dnet3f DOLLARS and fort,f-seven CENTS ($40,590.47}, the total amoun'
of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed twenty-five (25)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall
not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the
City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work,
prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as
the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer,
shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid
a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment
request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, o
any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion o~
CONTRACT CA-2 r:%cip%projects%pw94-08VDidpkg
the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with tha CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the
Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the
Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded,
the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
10.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
CONTRACT CA-3 r:~cip~projects~ow94-Oa~bidpkg skg
18.
INSPECTION. The work shell be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide ell reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:%eip~ptojects~pw94-O8VDidpkg leg
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip~projects%pw94-O8\bidpkg skg
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Community Facilities District 88-12 -
Winchester Interchange improvements Agreement with Riverside County
for Real Property Services
PREPARED BY: ~;~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Real Property Services
for the acquisition of property for the Winchester Interchange Improvements - CFD 88-
12 in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the Winchester Interchange Improvement Project a review was
made by Caltrans of the proposed improvements including the dimensions of the curves to be
used for the northbound off ramp.
Changes to the length of the radius used in designing the off ramp where required by Caltrans
which extended the new off ramp beyond the existing right-of-way. Two parcels must be
acquired to provide for the new off ramp design for a total of 1.13 acres.
The additional property necessary to construct the proposed improvements must be acquired
in accordance of the guidelines established by Caltrans since they will be the ultimate owner.
Several methods of acquiring the property are available however, all of them require that both
the appraiser and acquisition agent be certified by Caltrans. In order to expedite the process
we have recommended that the County of Riverside be selected to perform this work since
they are pre-qualified by Caltrans to perform this service, have acquired property for other
agencies which was transferred to Caltrans and can perform the services within the project
schedule.
-1o
r:\agdrpt\94\l 129\cfd88-12.agr/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to acquire the two (2) parcels necessary to construct the Winchester Interchange
Improvements Project has been identified in the Capital Improvement Program and will be
funded through the Redevelopment Agency and appropriated in the Capital Improvement
Project Fund, account number 210-165-602-5700. An operating transfer in the amount of
~25,000will be required from the Redevelopment Agency to the Capital Improvement Project
Fund to cover the cost of this agreement.
Attachments:
1. Agreement for Real Property Services
2. Cost Proposal to Perform Property Acquisition
-2- r:~agdrpt~94\l 129\cfd88-12,agr/ajp
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY SERVICES
This Agreement is made this 14th day of November 1994, by and between
the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY/BUILDING SERVICES, herein
called "Building Services", and the CITY OF TEMECULA, herein called "City".
1. RECITALS
City has a need to acquire, and appraise interests in land.
County of Riverside has established within GSA/Building Services, a
Real Property Division, herein called "Real Property", to acquire, manage, and dispose of
real property on a County-wide basis.
2. TERM
This Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and the
County and shall terminate on December 31, 1995.
3. COORDINATION
(a) The official representative of the City on all property related
matters shall be the City's designee. The official representative of Real Property on all
property related matters shall be Building Services Real Property manager or his designee.
Building Services Real Property Manager or his designea will
make all contacts with the City through the City's official so designated. By the same
token, contacts to be made by City's personnel with Real Property will be coordinated
through the Real Property Manager or his designas.
(b) Building Services Real Property Representative will meet as
necessary with the City's Representative and designated staff to review and discues
acquisition and status of work. Real Property will perform work under this Agreement.
(c) When a need occurs to use Eminent Domain power to acquire
property, the City will use its Authority.
(d) Real Property will be provided with a work order number for
each project. Only work related to the project can be charged. All charges shall be paid
within 45 days of receipt of an invoice approved by the City at ratas as agreed.
(e) Both parties recognize that project priorities may change
abruptly end that effective communications and a positive working relationship are needed
to maintain flexibility and to respond to unpredicted events. Real Property recognizes that
the City may direct Real Property to cease work under this Agreement at any time.
Page 1 of 5
1 4. PROCEDURES
(a) The City shall transmit to Real Property work orders for ...t
project to consist of the following:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
(b)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Maps, legal descriptions and conveyancing documents
for property to be acquired.
Area of each parcel.
Plan and profile maps of proposed project (may be
preliminary).
Copy of Environmental Assessment or report.
A proposed time schedule for completion of acquisition.
Within five (5) working days, Real Property will:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Acknowledge receipt and indicate concurrence with time
schedule;
Work Order Number,
Negotiate a mutually acceptable schedule of possession
of land.
13
(c) The City will obtain all right of way or property maps for property
:14 to be acquired by Real Property or to be leased by others. In the preparation of such
property maps, it will be necessary to secure title reports. Real Property shall negr,
15 agreements with title companies acceptable to the City for providing such serv,
including appropriate fees. Real Property will obtain such preliminary reports or litigations;
16 guarantees as are required through local title companies now under contract, The City will
17 pay for same directly.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
(d) When staff appraisals are deemed appropriate by Real Property,
Real Property shall acquire such appraisal from an independent appraiser. The appraisal
will be reviewed and approved by the Real Property Manager or his designee and the City.
(e) During the course of negotiations no commitments will be made
to any property owner without the written consent of the City. All such commitments will
be addressed in a formal acquisition agreement negotiated by Real Property and approved
by the Real Property Manager of his designee and the City.
(f) No acquisition will be made above the approved appraisal value
of the parcel of land unless pdor written approval for such acquisition is given by the City.
25
26
27
(g) Real Property will establish and provide necessary escrow
services for all parcels acquired on behalf of the City, Real Property, after receipt of full
executed agreements, shall transmit the owners copy.
28 Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(h) Real Property will be responsible for all actions necessary to
clear title, such as obtaining reconveyances, paying demands, fees, etc. All payments will
be charged to the project work order number.
(i) All fight of way documents, when ready for approval by the City
shall be returned to the City for approval by their designated person.
(j) Following recordation of deeds, Real Property will obtain the
policy of Title Insurance.
(k)
As a final product, Real Property shall return to the City the
following:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Project file.
Original recorded deed.
Odginal approved fight of way agreements.
Policy of Title Insurance.
Other correspondence, notes, and other information
documenting the acquisition.
5. SURPLUS PROPERTY
(a) The City may provide Real Property with a request to sell or
lease surplus property. If such a request is made, Real Property shall perform an appraisal
and submit it to the City for approval. After wdtten approval by the City, Real Property will
either prepare the necessary bid package, or if appropriate, negotiate the sale. If an
independent appraiser is utilized, Real Property will select the appraiser with the
concurrence of the City.
(b) For rental property the City will submit a wdtten request to Real
Property to attempt to find a lessee. Real Property will appraise the property to determine
an appropriate rental rate and obtain written approval of the City for such rental rate. Real
Property will then negotiate the terms of the lease. Upon completion of negotiations, the
lease will be submitted to the City for possible execution.
6. OTHER SERVICES
(a) Real Property shall perform other services for the City as follows:
(1) If the City wishes Real Property to perform planning
studies or budget preparation in connection with fight of way services, the City will submit
a map of a proposed project with general dimensions and location to Real Property. Real
Property will provide the city with an estimate of the costs to acquire said property within
such project, This estimate shall be a budgetary estimate based on readily available
information with an appropriate contingency factor to cover unknowns at the time of the
estimate.
Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1'7
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
3.996 27
28
11. A'I'rORNEYS' FEES
In any action brought by either party to enforce the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other award, to have
its attorneys' fees plus other costs of suit.
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
City Clerk
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By:
Deputy
AWEST:
GERALD A, MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By:
Deputy
[SEAL]
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By:
MISCHELLE ZIMMERMAN, Director
General Services Agency
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman,
Board of Supervisors
Page 5 of 5
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY
BUILDING SERVICES
3133 SEVENTH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 925074199
(909) 275-480O
FAX (909) 275-4828
November 14, 1994
City of Temecula
Department of Public Works
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Daniel Waldo, Jr.,
Director
CTTYOFTB~ECULA
ENGII, E~RiNGpEpARTT-MEN'r '
Attn: Mr. Don Spagnola, P.E.,
Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Re:
City of Temecula / County of Riverside Agreement
Winchester Road / Interstate 15 Interchange
Dear Mr. Spagnola:
Per our meeting, I am forwarding the charges for the Winchester Road / interstate 15
Interchange with the agreement for property services. We also discussed grant deeds
in the name of the State of California for the fee title acquisition of portions of APN 910-
130-036 and 910-130-044, but all acquisition agreements will be executed by the City of
Temecula.
The overall charges will not exceed $25,000.00 for this project. The estimated charges
are broken down as follows:
Secretarial Services (50 hours $10.00 er hour) ............. $ 500.00
4 hours- appraisal le~-ters, conFacts.
35 hours - document preparation.
1 hours - letters, document changes, condemnation packages.
Right of Way Agents ................................. $ 9,022.00
175 Hours - Appraismal review title review, document preparation
resentation meetin, meetings, negotiations (meetings
~tters, phone cal~, escrow preparation, etc.) an~J
conde nation (preparation of con~temnation package
litigation preparation and service of summons an~j
complaint).
Trave,'2' 'tFi":
Temecula and c~ients.
Appraisal (approximate) ................................ $10,000.00
Rounded $25,000.00
ARONffECTUEE-ENQINEERINQ DNISION CUSTODIAL DIVISION MAINTENANCE DIVISION REAL PTtOPERTY DNBION
(909) 275-4810 [909) 27~4839 (909) 2754830 (909) 275-4820
FAX (909) 275-48q0 FAX (~09) 275-4828 FAX (909) 275-4828 FAX d~09) 275-4828
Letter - Mr. Don Spagnola, P.E.
November 14, 1994
Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Pamela L. Stamen
Acting Supervising
Real Property Agent
PLS:gg
3.996
cc: David H. Slaughter, GSA/Building Services
File
ITEM 12
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Scott F. Field, City Attorney's Office
November 29, 1994
Cable Television Rate Regulation
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Conduct public hearing, taking written and oral testimony from all interested
parties, including Inland Valley Cablevision;
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DISAPPROVING THE CABLE TELEVISION RATES
FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OF
INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION, AND ORDERING A REFUND
FOR EXCESSIVE RATES
DISCUSSION:
In 1992, Congress amended the Federal Cable Television Act to authorize local franchising
authorities to regulate cable television rates and installation and equipment charges for
basic tier service. The FCC then established September 1, 1993 as the date on which rate
regulation ma~ begin. The FCC also developed a set of regulations "rolling back" cable
rates to "benchmark" levels. The benchmark rates are intended to be the rates a cable
operator would charge if it were subject to effective competition.
In order to determine if the operator's rates are at the benchmark, the FCC developed its
Form 393. Through completing the Form 393, the operator determines what its
benchmark rates are. The City is then responsible for reviewing and approving the rates
set forth in the Form 393. The Form 393 is only used for the period from September 1,
1993 through July 14, 1994. After July 14, the Form 1200 is used.
Burke, Willjams & Sorensen, with the assistance of Diehi, Evans & Company, have
reviewed the Form 393. On September 29, 1994, they filed with the City their reports
recommending that the City disapprove the September 1, 1993 rates and order a refund to
basic subscribers within the City. (Exhibits B and C.) In order to meet the legal
requirements of providing notice of the public hearing and to make their reports available
for review, a public hearing was October 11, 1994 to consider the reports.
Inland Valley responded to the reports on October 6, 1994 and November 9, 1994. Their
response challenged the City's reports in five areas:
In calculating maximum basic tier rates, the number of channels as of September
30, 1992 and September 1, 1993, must be determined. To do this, the channel
line-up cards of Inland Valley were reviewed. Inland Valley had manually corrected
its September 30, 1992 channel line-up to state that 37 channels were offered, and
the rates were analyzed accordingly. However, Inland contends in its October 6th
letter that actually only 36 channels were offered.
The second critical date to determine the number of channels is September 1, 1993.
The channel card for that date indicated that 45 channels were offered on the
system, but one was unavailable in Temecula and a second was "to be announced."
Accordingly, the Diehi, Evans & Company Report analyzed rates based upon 43
channels. Inland Valley contends the correct channel count is 44.
FCC supplemental instructions on completion of Form 393 indicated that the same
figure should be used on lines 301 and 104 of Form 393. In analyzing rates, Diehi,
Evans made this adjustment. Inland Valley contends that it is not required to
refresh the data in this manner.
Inland disputed the consultants' decision to not permit the pass through to
subscribers of the possessory interest tax.
Inland challenged the adjustments Diehi, Evans made to the amoritazation of
converters.
In order to provide for an adequate time to review Inland Valley's comments and attempt
to achieve a compromise on rates, inland extended the refund liability period back to
September 1, 1993 and allowed the City to still order a full rate refund until November 30,
1994.
Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Diehi, Evans and Company have now completed their
review of Inland's comments. They have accepted comments I and 2, rejected 3 and 4,
and partially accepted 5. (See, letter of November 21, 1994 from Burke, Willlares &
Sorensen to Inland Valley.) Accordingly, Diehi, Evans revised its calculation of maximum
basic service subscriber rates as follows:
Subscriber Rates
TEMECULA CABLE TELEVISION RATES
September 1, 1993- July 14, 1994
Basic Channels Price Per Channel
September 30, 1992 $12.31 14 $0.879
September 1, 1993 (Actual) 11.82 23 $0.513
September 1, 1993 (Permitted) 11.39 23 $0.495
Rate Reduction -- $0.92 per month, plus 9 channels
September 30, 1992 (Actual)
September 1, 1993 (Actual)
September 1, 1993 (Permitted)* 21.78
Basic Channels Price Per Channe/
& CPS
$18.74 37
22.19 44
44
$0.506
$0.504
$0.495
Rate Increase = $3.04 per month, plus six channels
II. Eouioment Rates Converters Remote
September 1, 1993 (Actual) $2.55 $0.50
September 1, 1993 (Permitted) $2.26 $0.42
It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing these rates.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The franchise fee levied by the City is based on gross revenue generated by the cable
operator; therefore, a decrease in the allowable rate for cable service will result in a
decrease in franchise fee revenue.
ACTION DOCUMENTS:
A. Resolution disapproving rates and ordering refunds
RE3OLtrlION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA DISAPPROVING ~ CABLE
TELls, VISION RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE TfER AND
ASSOCIATEI} EQ~ OF INLAND VAI,I,EY
CABLEVISION, AND ORDERING A RRFUND FOR
EXCESSIVE RATES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE_MECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula ("City") was certified to regulate rates for
cable programming services and equipment pursuant to the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992;
WHRREAS, Western Communication, dba Inland Valley Cablevision ("Inland
Valley") holds a franchise to operate a cable television system within the City;
VHWRF.,AS, on or about January 26, 1994, Inland Valley filed its Form 393
with the City seeking approval of its maximum initial permitted rates for regulated cable
programming services and equipment;
WHRREAS, the City has obtained reports from dated September 29, 1994
from Burke, Willdams & Sorensen and September 21, 1994 from Diehl, Evans & Company,
analyzing the Form 393 submitted by Inland Valley;
WIIRREAS, Inland Valley has submitted a response to the these Reports, by
way of a letters from Cole, Raywid & Braverman dated October 6, 1994 and November 9,
1994;
WHEREAS, Inland Valley has extended the time for the City to act on the
Form 393 to November 30, 1994;
WHRREAS, Burke, Williams & Sorensen has responded to Inland Valley's
comments, by way of a letter dated November 21, 1994. Based upon said letter Diehi,
Evans & Company has revised its computation of Form 393, dated October 18, 1994;
WHRREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing pursuant to Sections
76,935 and 76,942 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations to take written and oral
testimony from all interested parties, including Inland Valley, concerning the Form 393
submitted by Inland Valley, the aforementioned reports and Inland Valley's response thereto;
and
R:',l~sos~46 1
WI~IF, AS, the City Council has considered the testimony received during
the public hearing and the reports and letter described above;
NOW, ~ORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
resolves, determines and orders as follows:
Section 1. The rates and charges for the Basic Services Tier and associated
equipment as identified in the FCC Form 393 are hereby disapproved for the reasons and on
the grounds contained in the Reports of Burke, Willjams & Sorensen and Diehi, Evans &
Company, which reports are incorporated into this Resolution by reference as if fully stated
herein.
Section 2. This Resolution constitutes a written decision disapproving, in
whole or in pan, initial rates within the meaning of Section 76.936 of the Rules and
Regulations of the Commission.
Section 3. The permitted rates for the basic service tier and associated
equipment for the period from September l, 1993 through luly 14, 1994 shall be as follows:
·
·
·
·
·
· Basic service tier (23 channels) - $11.39
· Hourly Service Charge - $44.50
· Installation of unwired homes - $44.50
· Installation of prewired homes - $29.82
· Installation of additional connection
at time of initial installation -
Installation of additional connection
as separate installation -
New install - underground
Trip charge
Tier change charge
Monthly charge for lease of remote control -
Monthly charge of converter box -
- $0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$11.13
$22.25
$ 0.42
$ 2.26
2
Section 4. For the period from September 1, 1993 through July 14, 1994,
Inland Valley shall refund to subscribers that portion of previously paid basic service tier and
equipment rates in excess of the permitted rates established in Section 3 of this Resolution.
Inland Valley shall implement the refund no hter than 30 days after the date
this Resolution is approved by the City Council.
Section 5. Inland Valley, in its discretion, may implement the refund required
in Section 4 in the following manner.
(A)
By returning overcharges to those subscribers who acWally paid the
overcharges, either through direct payment or as a specifically
identified credit to those subscribers' bill; or
(B)
By means of a prospective percentage reduction in the rates for the
basic service tier or associated equipment to cover the cumulative
overcharge. This shall be reflected as a specifically identified, one-
time credit on prospective bills to the class of subscribers that currently
subscribe to the cable system.
Section 6. All refunds required pursuant to Section 4 shall include interest
computed at the same rate as established by the United States Internal Revenue Service for
tax refunds and additional tax payments.
Section 7. At least ten (10) days prior to implementing any refunds, Inland
Valley shall notify the City how it intends to implement the refund order and how it
calculated the amount of the refund.
Section 8. Inland Valley shall notify the City of the gross amount of the
refund owing subscribers and the amount of the refund upon which Inland Valley paid any
franchise fee to the City. Within thirty {30) days of receiving the statement from Inland
Valley, the City shall refund to Inland Valley that portion of the franchise fee that was paid
on refunds made to subscribers.
Section 9. The City Council has determined that the maximum rate for the
cable programming service tier is $0.495 per channel, or $10.39 for the 21 channels offered
on the second tier. However, Inland Valley is charging subscribers $10.97 for the cable
programming service tier. The City Manager is hereby directed to bring this discrepancy to
the attention of the FCC for the purpose of determining if subscribers are entitled to a refund
on the cable programming service tier.
3
Section 10. Should Inland Valley appeal ~s rate determination of the City
Council of the City of Temeeula to the FCC pursuant to Section 76.944 of the Rules and
Regulations of the Commission, the City Council does grant an automatic stay of the
execution of the refund ordered hereunder. Such stay does not constitute a change in the
effective date or implementation date of this Resolution. Nor does such stay, in any way,
constitute an endorsement of the rates and charges in effect from September 1, 1993 to July
14, 1994.
Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post a copy of this resolution
in such place or places as City Notices are normally posted and to make copies to this
decision available to the public at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.
Section 12. This resolution shall become effective as of the date of adoption.
PASSI~D AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at its
regular meeting held on the __. day of July, 1994.
A~r_~ST:
Ron Robert.s, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
4
STATE OF CA~ .r~ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEIvIECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO I-IF)I~.Ry CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regtdnr meeting of said City Council held on
the 29th day of November, 1994; by the following roll call vote:
COUNCIL MEMBER:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBER:
COUNCIL MEMBER:
~unc S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
LAW OFFICES
BURKE, WXLLLAMS & SORENSEN
September 29, 1994
(It3) 33H2~O
Mayor Ron Roberrs
and Members of the City Council
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Cable Television Rates for Basic Service Tier and
Associated Equipment of Inland Valley Cablevision
Dear Mayor Roberts and City Councilmembers:
In 1992, Congress enacted the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act Of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act"). One
of the principal objectives of the 1992 Cable Act was to regulate
cable television rates, which had risen significantly since
Congress had deregulated cable rates pursuant in 1984.
In order to implement the 1992 Cable Act, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations establishing a
"benchmark" system of rate regulation. These initial rate
regulations were contained in the FCC's April 1993 First Report and
Order, which went into effect on September 1, 1993.
Temecula's cable operator, Inland Valley Cablevision,
like all other cable operators throughout the nation, instituted a
new rate structure on September 1, 1993 in order to comply with the
FCC's benchmark rates. Inland Valley Cablevision also filed a rate
regulation form with the City, known as the Form 393, so that the
city could independently determine if Inland Valley Cablevision's
rates complied with the FCC regulations.
The benchmark rates represents the rates a cable operator
would charge if it were subject to "effective competition." The
benchmark system was derived from a nation-wide rate survey the FCC
conducted as September 30, 1992, Based on the survey, the FCC
concluded that cable rates should be reduced by 10% from their
September 30, 1992 levels to account for a lack of effective
competition in the cable television industry.
ORANGE: 1535.1
September 29, 1994
Page 2
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, with consulting services from
the accounting firm of Diehl, Evans, has reviewed the cable
television rates contained in Inland Valley's Form 393. The Report
of Diehl, Evans is attached.
It is our conclusion that Inland Valley Cablevision's
rates in Temecula are in excess of the rates permitted pursuant to
FCC Regulations, and that a refund is in order. Consequently, it
is recommended that the City Council adopt the enclosed Resolution
entitled:
"A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Temecula Disapproving the Cable Television
Rates for Basic Service Tier and Associated
Equipment Of Inland Valley Cablevision, and
Ordering a Refund for Excessive Rates."
The principal effect of this Resolution is to reduce
basic tier cable rates. This means that as a result of rate
regulation, since September 30, 1992 basic tier rates have been
reduced from $12.31 for 14 channels to $11.66 for 23 channels.
I. BackGround
Under the 1992 Cable Act, cities are authorized to
regulate "basic tier" rates, along with installation and equipment
charges. The "basic tier" of cable service includes all broadcast
television channels, any public, educational and governmental
channels required by the franchise and any other channels the
operator choose to carry on the basic tier. Each cable operator is
required to offer the basic tier of service. Cable operators may
not require ~ubscription to any other tier as a condition of
receiving programming offered on a per channel or pay-per-view
basis.
The 1992 Cable Act further permits subscribers and cities
to file complaints with the FCC.if they believe rates for the
second service tier (known as the cable programming service or
"CPS" tier) are unreasonable. The CPS tier typically includes most
satellite channels, like CNN, WTBS and Prime Ticket, but excludes
premium and pay-per-view channels.
:1535.1
September 29, 1994
Page 3
Once Temecula became certified to regulate rates, Inland
Valley Cablevision was required to file a rate schedule with the
City -- known as a Form 393 -- to obtain City approval of its basic
tier rates. Essentially, the Form 393 takes the operator through
two steps to establish maximum rates for the basic service tier and .
for equipment and installation charges.
First, the maximum rates for equipment and installation
are determined based upon actual cost plus a reasonable profit.
These maximum rates are established by determining the capital
costs and expenses associated with each type of equipment (e.g.
converter boxes, remote controls) and service (e.g., installation
for unwired and prewired homes).
In particular, an "hourly service charge" is determined.
The hourly service charge represents the cable operator's hourly
labor rate for performing the various types of installations. For
example, if the hourly service charge is $27.14 (the national
average) and its takes 1.25 hours to install service at a prewired
home, then the maximum service charge for installing service at a
prewired house is 1.25 x $27.14 = $33.93.
Second, maximum basic service tier rates as established.
The Form 393 is designed to squeeze out "monopoly profits" from
subscriber rates. To do this , the Form 393 uses a series of
worksheets to determine if rates need to be reduced, and by how
much. Three factors are used to determine benchmark rates: number
of subscribers, number of channels, and n,~mher of satellite
signals. Then, if the actual cable rates are below the benchmark
rates, the current rates become the maximum regulated rates,
whichever is less.
Mor& recently, the FCC has ~eplaced the Form393 with the
Form 1200. This new form was a result of the FCC's March 30, 1994,
Second Report and Order, in which the FCC concluded that its
original determination that rates should be reduced by an average
of 10% was insufficient, and that rates actually should be reduced
by approximately 17%. Accordingly, the FCC issued a new Form 1200
and a new set of rate regulations. These regulations went into
effect on July 14, 1994, and on that same date, Inland Valley
Cablevision, like cable operators throughout the nation, readjusted
its rates.
535.1
September 29, 1994
Page 4
However, instead of setting benchmark rates, Inland chose
the option of basing its maximum permitted rate on a cost-of-
service showing. The FCC also adopted on March 30, 1994 cost-of-
service rate regulations to provide a "safety valve" to cable
Operators ensuring them compensatory rates if their benchmark rates
were too low. The cost-of-service standards were issued as interim
regulations pending the outcome of a cost study currently underway
at the FCC. Only the cable operator, not the FCC or the City can
decide, whether to undertake a cost-of-service showing. Cost-of-
service showings must be submitted on FCC Form 1220. Inland
submitted its Form 1220 to the City on August 15, 1994.
A very brief summary of the impact of rate regulation on
Temecula is attached. A more detailed explanation of our review of
Inland Valley Cablevision's Form 393 is set forth below.
II. Review of Inland Valley Cablevision's Form 393
The Diehl, Evans review of Inland Valley Cablevision's
Form 393 disclosed several material errors in setting the maximum
basic tier and equipment and installation rates. In summary,
Diehl, Evans found as follows:
1. Basic Tier Rates. On September 30, 1992, Inland
offered two service tiers subject to regulation: the basic tier
comprising 14 channels, and the CPS tier comprising 23 channels.
At that time, Inland charged $12.31 for 14 channels of basic tier
service and $18.74 for 37 channels of Basic/CPS service. (These
rates include a $0.46 pass-through charge for the possessory
interest tax.)
On September 1, 1993, Inland retiered in response to rate
regulation, offering 23 basic tier channels and 20 CPS tier
channels. Concurrently, Inland modified its rates to charge $11.82
for basic tier service and $22.19 for basic/CPS service.
Subsequently, Inland filed its Form 393, claiming a maximum
permitted rate for basic tier service of $11.87. (All of these
rates include the $0.46 pass through.)
Diehl, Evans' analysis concludes that Inland's Form 393
contains a number of material errors. Consequently, it is
recommended that the maximum basdic service tier rate should be
reduced to $11.66 for 23 channels or $0.507. This amounts to a
refund to basic service tier subscribers of $0.16 per month.
0k 1535.1
September 29, 1994
Page 5
2. Ec~aiDment and Installation Rates. FCC Regulations
set the maximum equipment and installation rates at the lesser of
the maximum permitted rate according to the Form 393 or the actual
rate. In this case, Inland's equipment rental rates exceed its
permitted rates.
Specifically, Inland's equipment and installation rate
schedule will be adjusted as follows:
Permitted A c t u a i Lower of
Rate Rate Actual or
Permitted
Rate
Hourly Rate
$44.52 $44.50 $44.50
Installation of unwired 44.52 44.50 44.50
homes
Installation of prewired 29.83 29.82 29.82
homes
Installation of
additional connection at
time of initial
11.13 11.13 11.13
Installation of
additional connections as
separate installation
22.26 22.25 22.25
New install underground 0.00
Trip cha~ge 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Charge for changing tiers 0.00
0.00 0.00
Monthly charge for lease 0.32 0.50 0.32
of remote control
Monthly charge
converter box
of 2.34 2.55 2.34
ORANGE: 1535.1
September 29, 1994
Page 6
III. Recommendation
Our recommendation on implementing our review of the Form
393 have two components: Establishing Maximum Rates and Refunds.
1. Establishina Maximum Rates. The basic service tier
rate for the period from September 1, 1993 through July 14, 1994
should be reduced from the then current rate of $11.82 per month to
$11.66 per month, and a refund should be ordered. This should be
implemented thirty (30) days after the City Council establishes the
maximum rate.
The maximum equipment and service charges should be set
at the lower of the permitted and actual rates.
2. Refunds. FCC Regulations provide that the City may
not order refunds for more than one year retroactively.
Consequently, if a city is to order any refunds for the full period
between September 1, 1993 through July 14, 1994, it is required to
act by September 1, 1994. Unfortunately, in order to complete our
review of Inland's rates, several document requests were necessary,
delaying completion of the review. Consequently, refund liability
is from October 11, 1993 through July 14, 1994.
In this case, Inland was overcharging on its basic rates
by $0.16 per month. Consequently, for the period from October 11,
1993, through July 15, 1994, each basic tier subscriber will be
refunded or credited approximately $1.44, which will be
approximately $13,131.36 for 9,119 subscribers for 9 months.
In addition, Inland was overcharging on remote controls
and converter~ boxes by $0.21 and $0.18 per month, respectively.
Consequently, basic subscribers who also leased a remote control
and Converter will receive an additional refund or credit of $3.51.
Further, the FCC regulates rates for the CPS tier. This
same analysis indicates a $0.23 per month overcharge for CPS
service. The Resolution directs the City Manager to bring this
discrepancy to the attention of the FCC.
Finally, FCC Regulations also specify certain procedures
for ordering rate refunds. Accordingly, the recommended refund
order directs Inland to take the following steps within thirty days
after Council action:
:1535.1
September 29,
Page 7
1994
Inland may make refunds:
(i) By refunding overcharges to those subscribers
who actually paid the overcharges; or
(ii) By means of a specifically identified, one-
time credit on prospective bills.
Refunds shall include interest computed at
applicable rates published by the Internal. Revenue
Service for tax refunds and additional tax
payments.
When the City orders a cable operator to pay
refunds to subscribers, it also must return to the
operator that portion of the franchise fee that was
paid on the total amount of the refund to
subscribers. The City must promptly return the
franchise fee overcharge either in an immediate
lump sum payment, or Inland may deduct it from
future franchise fee payments.
In conclusion, the FCC Regulations require that the City
council conduct a public hearing at which Inland may testify before
any of the above actions are taken. I will be available at that
public hearing to answer any questions the City Council may have.
Very truly yours,
CC:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
William Morgan, CPA
SCOTT F. FIELD
of BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
ORANGE: 1535.1
M DIEHL,EVANS
&COMPANY
18~1 VON KA~N AVe., SU[~ 2~
[RVINE, ~LI~IA 9Z715-1 ~2
PHONE (714) 757.77~
FAX (714) 757.Z707
September 21, 1994
RDDNEy K. McDANIEL CPA
MICHAEL II. LUDIN. CPA
CRAIG '~ SpRAKEII. CFA
PHILIp H. HOLTKAMR CPA
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORt ON AGREED-UPON
LIMITED PROCEDURES REVIEW
City Council
City of Temecula
Temecula, California
We have applied certain agreed-upon procedures to the accounting records of Western
Communications. Our procedures and findings are noted hereln. It is understood that this report is
solely for your information and is not to be referred to or distributed for my purpose to anyone who
is not a member of City Council or managemere of the City of Temecula, or an employee or
authorized represemative of Western Communications. However, if this report is made a maUer of
public record, its distribution will not be limited.
Because the procedures we performed do not constitute an examination in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards, we do not express an opinion on any of the accounts or items referred
to herere. In connection with these procedures, except as noted herere, no matters came to our
attention that caused us to believe that other specified accounts or items should be adjusted.
However, had we performed additional procedures, or had we made an e~t~mln.tion of the financial
statements of Western Communications in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
other matters migh~ have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report
relates only to the accounts and items specified herein, and does not extend to the financial statements
of Western Commumcations taken as a whole.
Although defalcations and similax irregularities may occasionally be disclosed by this type of
engagement, it is not designed for such purpose and should not be relied upon to disclose fraud,
should any exist.
-1-
OTHER OFRCF~5 AT:
SLIMMARY OF PROCEDURES
We applied the following procedures to the accoums and records of Western Communications,
hereinafter refen'ed to as "Western":
1. We compared channel line-ups and cable rates of Western as of September 30, 1992 and
September 1, 1993. (See Schedule 1).
2. We compared the number of channels and cable rates on the City of Temecula with other
selected Southern California cable TV system,s. (See Schedule 2).
We compared equipment and installation rates for Western with other selected Southern
California cable systems, and with average rates from a survey of 147 cable systems
compiled by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors
(NATOA). (See Schedule 3).
We reviev~d FCC Form 393 (as prepared by Western) to determine if the form had been
completed accurately and in accordance with FCC regulations and rate tables. Our review
included the following procedures:
We agreed key financial and subscriber data on Form 393 to the books and records
of Western. Our procedures included a review of channel cards, a review of sample
customer bills, VOUChing Of pllrchase illVOiCeS related to the acquisition of remote
controls and converter boxes and a review of Western's ~x~rksheets supporting their
computation of the hourly service charge and other charges.
We recomputed and compared the benchmark channel rates as of September 30, 1992
and January 3, 1994 (the initial date of regulation) with the rates reported on
Form 393.
c. We prepared a comprehensive letter to Western management setting forth questionable
areas in the computation of Form-393. We had various phone conferences with
Western officials regarding these matters.
d. We recomputed the maximum permitted per channel rate and the maximum permitted
rate for the basic service tier (exclusive of any franchise fee).
-2-
SUIVfIVIARY OF FINDINGS
5
On September 30, 1992, according m Worksheet 2 of the original Form 393, Western
offered 36 channels under t~o tiers for $18.28. Based on our review of the channel card,
Western was actually offering 37 channels at September 30, 1992. Also, the actual price
for both tiers was $18.74, a $0.46 difference. Western "passes through" the County
property tax to subscribers. The FCC Form 393 only permits franchise fees to be passed
through to subscribers. Consequently, the property tax of $0.46 should have been added
back to the basic tier rote. (See Schedule 1).
According to Worksheet 1 on the original Form 393, Western offered 44 channels under
t~ tiers for $20.29. Hov~ver, Western's channel card, which listed 45 channels,
indicated that no programrainE was available on two channels. Accordingly, our revised
Form 393 reflects 43 channels. Also, the rates on Worksheet I have been adjusted to the
actual rate in effect on the "initial date of regulation" plus the $0.46 property tax
pass-through. (See Schedule 1 and the discussion at paragraph 5 below).
Before adjustments recommended in this report, the average price per channel for the
tiers decreased only $.01, or 2.0%, from September 30, 1992 to September I, 1993.
Schedule 2 presents a comparison of the number of channels and basic cable rates on the
City of Temecula with other selected Southern California Cable TV system as of
September 1, 1993. The City of Temecula's per channel rate of $0,516 and rate of
$22.19 for 43 channels is reasonable, and is in line with other Southern California cable
systems.
5. In connection with our review of Form 393, we made the following adjustmems:
a. Worksheet 1, Line I01:
On Worksheet 1 of the original Form 393, as fried by Western, the Tier Charge for
the Basic Tier yeas reported as $12.88, and Tier 2 was reported as $7.41. As further
explained below, the Basic Tier amount should have been $11.82, and Tier 2 should
have been $10.37.
Under cable regulations issued by the FCC, the "initial date of regulation" is defined
as "the date of local notice that the system is subject to regulation". According to 47
CFR Section 76.922Co)(ii)(c)(2), this ate is when the City sends a written notice to
the cable cable operator that it is certified to regulate rates. Generally, the City also
notifies the operator at this time that k has 30 days to complete and forward Form 393
to the City.
On January 3, 1994, the City of Temecula sent notice to Western that it was certified
by the FCC to regulate basic tier rates. On January 26, 1994, Western forwarded
Form 393 to the City of Temecula. The cable rates, number of subscribers, etc. used
on Worksheet 1 of Form 393 should have been as of January 3, 1994.
-3-
SUIVIMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED)
(Continued):
a. Worksheet 1, Line 101 (Continued):
In reviewing the Form 393 from Western, we noted that the cable rates and number
of subscribers used on Worksheet 1 for the "Initial Date of Regulation" were as of a
date prior to September 1, 1993. Accordingly, in the revised Form 393, as presented
at Schedule 5, the amounts for Worksheet 1 were recomputed using cable rates in
effect on or after September 1, 1993, plus the $0.46 property tax pass-through.
b. Worksheet 1, Line 104/Worksheet 3, Line 301:
On the original Form 393, the amount reported on Worksheet 1, Line 104, was
$46,866, and the amount reported on Worksheet 3, Line 301, was $17,717. These
amounts .should be substantially the same, as explained below.
On November 10, 1993 the FCC issued a "Public Notice" entitled, "Questions and
Answers on Completion of FCC Form 393 and Associated Filing Requirements".
Question No. 7 dealt with amounts to be reported on Lines 104 and 301. The answer
to this question stated, in pan: "Where operators have restmctured equipment rates
as of September 1, 1993....we would anticipate that in most cases, absent special
circumstances, operators will enter on Line 104 the same, or nearly the same, number
on Line 301".
Accordingly, in our revised Form 393, we have used $16,509 at both L'me 104 and
301.
c. Worksheet 1, Lines 121 Through 128:
Line 121
The benchmark cable rate is a function of the number of satellites channels in relation
to the total of all channels, utilizing a table developed by the FCC. Based on the
information supplied by Western, at the date of initial regulation, using a total of 43
channels, 28 of which were satellite, the benchmark calculation would have been
$0.524.
Line 124
The instructions that accompany the FCC Form 393 calculate the time period factor
as "the number of whole months from September 30, 1992 to the date the cable
operator submits the FCC Form 393." Therefore, thi~ number varies accord'rag to the
date of submission of each cable operator's filing. The date of ~ing was January 26,
1994. The whole months from September 30, 1992 to January 26, 1994 totals 15.
SUIvIIViARY OF FINDINGS fCON'HNUED)
5. (Continued)
d. Worksheet 2, Line 220:
Line 220
The benchmark cable rate is a function of the number of satellites channels m relation
to the total of all channels, utilizing a table developed by the FCC. Based on the
information supplied by Western, for September 1992, using a total of 37 channels,
24 of which were satellite, the benchmark calculation would have been $0.590.
e. Revisions to Cable Rates:
Based on the adjus~nents discussed above, and based on our revised Form 393, as
presented at Schedule 5, the maximum permitted rite for the basic service tier should
be decreased from $11.82 ($11.36 as computed by Western, plus $0.46) to $11.65.
Recommendation: We suggest that the rate for the basic service tier be reduced from
$11.82 to $11.66, retroactive to September 1, 1993. This will r~sult in a rate
reduction of $0.16 per subscriber per month.
f. Equipment ahd Installation Charges:
Noted below is a comparison of the remote control charge, converter box charge and
hourly service charge for the City of Temecula with the National avenge for 147
cable systems (as published by the National Association of Telecommumcations
Officers and Advisors, or NATOA) and with certain other Southern California cable
systems.
City of Temecula (Western)
National Avenge .25
City of Alhambra (Cencom) .12
City of Costa Mesa (Copley/Colony) .27
South Orange County (Dimension) .16
Charge For
Remote Hourly
Control Converter Service
Charge Box Charge
$ .50 $ 2.55 $ 44.50
2.00 27.14
1.65 20.00
1.70 38.09
1.96 24.00
-5-
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED)
5. (Continued)
f. Equipment and Installation Charges (Continued):
Noted below is a discussion of how Western computed these charges, and our
recommended revisions to the charges, where appropriate.
Remote Control Charge
On Fore 393, Schedule C, Western reported a "gross book cost" for remote controls
of $21,703 for 2,725 units, or a cost per unit of $7.96. This mount appears
reasonable when compared with 1993 purchase invoices for remote controls. (During
1993, a large number of units v~re purchased at a unit price of $7.00, plus sales tax
and freight. )
However, in our opinion, the depm:iation charge on the remote controls was not
reasonable. The annual depreciation charge on Schedule C was $10,852, or exactly
one-half of the total costs of acquisition. This means that Western has depreciated the
remotes over two years. An official of Western advised us that the remotes nonally
are depreciated over five years. A five-year life appears reasonable. Accordingly,
in our recomputed Form 393 at Schedule 5, we have used a depreciable life of ~v~
years. and a depreciation charge of $4,341.
Also, on Form 393, Part KI, Stop C, Line 9, our review indicated that the number of
maintenance and service hours related to the remote controls should be 104 hours,
rather than 124 hours. (See Schedule 4).
As a result of these adjus~nents, we recommend that the charge for a remote control
be decreased from $0.50 to $0.32.
Converter Box Charge
On Form 393, Schedule C, Western reported a "gross book cost" for converter boxes
of $389,983 for 2,725 units, or a cost per unit of $143.11. A unit price of $143.11
appears excessive when compared with 1993 purchase invoices. (During 1993, most
converter boxes were purchased at prices ranging from $I 16.00 to $120.00, including
sales tax and freight.) Also, an official at Western advised us that converter boxes
normally are depreciated over 10 years. Accordingly, we made the following
adjustments to Schedule C:
-6-
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (CONTINUED)
(Continued)
f. Converter Box Charge (Continued):
Cost
As Originally
Reported $ 389,983
As Adjusted
(2,725 units
at $120.00)
Accumulated Net Book
Denreciation Value
ROI Current
(At 11.25 %) Devreciation
$ 72,239 $ 317,744 $ 35,746 $ 34,981
(18.5%)
327,000 60,495 266,505 29,982 32,700
(18.5%)
Also, on Form 393, Part rrI, Step D, Line 16, our review indicated that the number
of maintenance and service hours related to the converter boxes should be 312 hours
rather than 373 hour. (See Schedule 4).
As a result of these adjustments, we recommend that the charge for a converter box
be decreased front $2.55 to $2.34.
Hou~v Service Charge
The hourly service charge was computed in the following manner by Western:
Annual Costs for Maintenance
and Installation
$129~657
Tom/Labor Hours
21912
Hourly Service Charge $ a4.52
In reviewing this calculation, the number of labor holds appeared to be low based on
a subscriber count of 8,656. (Please noted that an increase in the number of labor
hours would cause a decrease in the hourly service Charge.) Upon investigation, we
were informed by Western management that Inland Valley Cablevision charges
customers only for time that the installation personnel are at the customer's home
performing the installation. Travel time and other "overhead" type hours are not
included. By contrast, ntost other cable operators contpute the hourly rate, and charge
custorners, based on an "average cost method" which includes travel and other
overhead hours. Also, many other cable operators have a separate "trip charge" in
addition to their standard installation charges. (See Schedule 3). If, in fact, Western
is charging custonters only for hours spent at the custonter's home, and not for travel
and preparation time, then we agree that the $44.52 rate per hour is reasonable.
However, the scope of this engagentent did not include a review of actual time charges
included on the bills to Tentecula subscribers.
-7-
SUPPORTING SC~F,r}ULES
SCHEDULE 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPARISON OF CHANNEL LINE-UPS AND CABLE RATES
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 AND SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
Description
September 30, 1992 Sevtember 1, 1993
Channels Pricing Channels Pricin~
Tier 1:
Total channels 14 $ 12.31 23 $ 11.82
Price per channel 0,879 0,513
Tier 2:
Total channels 23 6.43 20 10.37
Price per channel 0.279 0.518
Totals for
Tier 1 and
Tier 2:
Total Channels
Price Per Channel
37 $ 18.74 43 $ 22.19
$ 0.506 $ 0.516
Unaudited; see kndeDendem accountants' repoF. on agreed-upon limited procedures review.
-8-
SCHEDULE 2
COMPARISON OF C.~LE TV RATES FOR VARIOUS
SOUTHERN CAI.IFORNIA CITIES
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
Basic Tier Second Tier
Number Rate Basic Number Rate CPS
City of Per Service of Per Service
(Cable Overator) Channels Channel Rate Channels Channel Rate
City of Temecula
(Inland Valley) 23 $ .513 $ 11.82 20 $ .518 $ 10.37
National Avenge 20 .551 11.09
City of Alhambra
(Crown- Cencom)
29 .456 13.23 25 .456 11.40
City of Brea
(Century) 36 .715 25.75 6 .568 3.41
City of Buena Park
(Corneas0 33 .293 9.66 19 .750 14.26
City of Garden Grove
(Pm-agon)
City of Lakewood
(Colony) 33 .349 11.52 26 .349 9.07
City of Long Beach
(CVI) 26 .537 13.95 I8 .425 7.65
City of Orange
(Cablevision) 21 .534 11.20 20 .534 10.70
City of Paramount
(Contmental) 21 .406 8.53 27 .505 13.64
South Orange County
(Dimension) 28 .523 14.64 16 .506 8.10
City of Yorba Linda
(Jones Spacelink)
33 .423 13.96 20 .450 8.99
Unaudited: see independent accountants' report on agreed-upon limited procedures review.
-9-
SCHEDULE 2
COMPARISON OF CABLE TV RATES FOR VARIOUS
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES
(CONTINUED)
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
Total - Both Tiers
Number Rate Basic
City of Per Plus CPS
(Cable Operator) Channels Channel Rate
City of Temecula
(Inland Valley) 43 $ .516 $ 22.19
National Average
City of Alhambra
(Crown - Cencom)
54 .456 24.63
City of Brea
(Century) 42 .694 29.16
City of Buena Park
(Corncast) 52 .395 23.92
City of Garden Grove
(Paragon) 62 .343 21.25
City of Lakewood
(Colony) 59 .349 20.59
City ofLongBeach
(CVI) 44 .491 21.60
City of Orange
(Cablevision) 41 .534 21.90
City of Paramount
(Contmental) 48 .462 22.17
South Orange County
(Dimension) 44 .517 22.74
City of Yorba Linda
Gones Spaceli~)
53 .433 22.95
Unaudited; see independent accoumanm' report on agreed-upon limited procedures review.
-10-
SCI-I~_I)UL~ 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPARISON OF EQUIPMENT AND INSTAI.I.-~TION RATES FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA WITH OTHER CABLE TV SYSTEMS
AS OF SEPTEMBER I, 1993
Description
Equipmere
Charges:
Amounts
City of Temecula City of Lake~od South Orange From National
(Inland Valley) (Covlev/Colonv) County (Dimension) Survev (Note l/
Average
Hours Amount Hours Amount Hours Amount Hours Amount
Remote control $ .50 $ .19 $ .16 $ .25
Converter boxes 2.55 1.38 1.96 2.00
Imtalladon
Charges:
Hourly service
charge 44.50 31.44 24.00 27.14
Unwir~d Home -
Initial
installation:
· Aerial 1.0 44.50 1.3 39.30 1.43 34.34 1.56 39.96
· Underground 2.33 73.25 (Note 2)
Prowired Home .67 29.82 1.0 31.44 .60 14.72 .92 23.29
Additional
Outlets:
· With initial
installation : .25 11.13 .8 26.09 .25 9.81 .55 14.01
· Separate
imtallation .50 22.25 1.0 31.44 .55 13.08 .88 22.43
Other Charges:
Charge for
changing tiers 1.99 2.00 17.38
Trip charge 26.09 (Note 2)
Note 1: These hours and dollar mounts am "averages" from a national survey of 147 cable
systems. The mount were compiled by the National Association of Telecommunlcations
Officers and Advisors (NATIDA).
Note 2: This information was not awailable in NATORs survey.
Unaudited; see independent accountants' report on a=~reed-upon limited procedures review.
-11-
SCHEDULE 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR HOURS
JUNE 30, 1993
/NLAND V.~rr~'C. ABLA'V~ION
Unaudited: see inaependent accountants' mpon on a~r:ed-upon limited procedur:s review.
-12-
SCHEDULE 5
CITY OF TE1VIECULA
FORM 393, AS REVISED BY DIEIlL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CLTNAUDITED)
FILE NAJMfI::' I:'d994~AC~91~31.V/K1
FCC 393 - PART I
REQUEST FOR CABLE RATE APPROVAL
COVER SHEET
Community Unit Identification Code
CA
Name of Cable Operator
INLAND VAI-I-EY CABLEVISION
Mailing Address
Date: 21 -- Sep - 94
City
Pcrson to contact regarding this form
State ZIP Code
Telephone Fax Number
Local Franchising Authority
(jl'fY OF TEMECULA
Mailing Addtress
City ~e ZIP Code
This form is being filed with respect to:
[~ Insic rate regulation
cable prO~t'ammln~ service rate regulation
If this form is being filed in response to a complaint about your cable programre;rig service rates, please attach a copy of the
complaint to this cover sheet.
The following sections are to be completed after you have filled out the worksheets in PARTS H and III and calculated
your actual and permitted rates.
FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND EQUIPMENT
**
Program Service Rate
(1) Number of chaancls in basic service tier
(9) Curreut rate for basic service tier: (do not include any ~'anchise fees)
(3) Maximum permitted per channel rate: (from Line 600, Part II)
(4) Maximum permitted rate for basic service tier (exclusive of auy franchise fee):
(multiVlv (1') bv (3) above)
23
$11.82
$0.507
$11.66
Note: If your current rate for the basic service tier (entry 2) exceeds the roaMmum permitted rate for that tier (entry 4), you
must submit a cost-of-service showing or your basic service rate will be reduced to the maximum permitted level shown in
entry 4.
Franchise fees have been excluded from this anai~is in order to compare your monthly rate for the
basic service tier to the maximum permitted level. whether you itemize them or not, any franchise
fees you pay for the basic servic~ tier should be added to your monthly rate as part of the service
when billing your su~cribevs. See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.985.
EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION RATES
Note: Your equipment and installation rates for the basic ser~ce tier must not be included in your program service rate for that
tier, but rather must be completely unbundied. In addition, those equipment and installation rates must not exceed your actu'
cos~ including a reasonable profit. The method for unbundling your equipment and installation rate~ fxom the basic service
programming rate, (if necessary), and for determining your permitted equipment and installation rate~, is pruscribed in PART
(unbundIing) and PART III {rate-setting) of this form. Enter in the spaces below the rate figures you have calculated in PART III
of this form. Your actual basic service equipment and installation charges may not exceed these rates, although they may be lower.
(1) Charges for basic service instatlations* (from Lines
6 or 7 of Equipment and Installation Worksheet)
{a) Hourly rate OR
(b) Average instalhtion charges:
I. lustatlation of unwlred homes
2. Iusta]Jation of presstired homes
3. Installation of additional connetion at time of
initial instalhtion
4. Instalhtion of additional connections
requiring separate instalhtion
5. Other installations (specify)
TRIP CHARGE
NEW INSTALL-UNDERGROUND
Item 3
(2) Chargrforchanging tiers (if auy) (from Line 29,
30,or 31 of Equipment and Installation Worksheet)
(3) Monthly charge for leas~ of remote controis (from
Line 21 in Equipment and Installation Worksheet)
Remote control type 1:
Remote control type 2:
Remote control typ~ 3:
(4) Monthly charge for lease of converter boxes (from
Line 14 in Equipment and lustallation Worksheet)
Conwrter box typ~ 1:
Converter box type 2:
Conyerror box type 3:
(5) Monthly charge for lease of other equipment (from
Line 28 in Equipment and Iosm._ll~tiou WorBheet~
Other equipment (specify)
Other 2:
AUtUAL PERM~'rrP, D 'RECOMMENDED
$44.50 $4,!..52 $44.50
~:.~::~i:::!::.~:i::::?:~:.iii?::~:.::!i~i!~!~:!:;:.:!:;~::~!;i:~:!i::!!?::i.:.~i.~!::!.!i!!:~!: ~:::i:~ ::~:~ ;;":::~:' ::: :.:
$44.50 $~,;.52 $44.50
$29.82 $29.83 $29.82
$11.13 $11.13 $11.13
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
i
$o.soi
$0.32
$2.55 $2.34
$2.34
If you have further charges for additional connections beyond those reflected in your mtaBation charge, attach a sheet
explaining your calculations and setting forth those additional charges. SEE Note to Equipment and last~llntion Worksheet
instructions in PART III of this form.
(D
-, =
FCC FORM 393 -- PART III
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION CHARGES
Cable C~perator Name:
INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION
Franchise Authmity:
Commuhity Unit ID (CUID):
'Date: 21 -Sep-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
Line 1.
Line 2.
Une 3.
line 4.
Line 5.
Step A. Hourly Service Charge
Annu~ cost of muintcnznce snd installation o[ cable facifities
and Scrvicc~ (exclude purchase cost of consumer equipment)
(Bctt 1 of Schedule A + Bent 2 of SChedule B)
Customer equipment and installation perenrage (attach explanation)
Annual customer equipment maintenance and installation costs,
exciudinS cost of lc&tm:l equipment (Line l · Line 2)
Total labor horn for maintenance and installation of cantomet
equipment and sel~c~ (attach explanation)
Hourly sen'ice charge (HSC) (Line 3/Line 4)
$193,517
67.0%
$129,657
2,912
line 6,
OR
Line 7.
Step B. Installation charge
Uniform HSC for all installations (insert amount from Line 5)
Average charge for instillsLion type
(See schcduie D for average insl~dlstion chsrge calc~afions)
z. Unwired home instuilation(ScheduleD. Linez..2)
b. Prewired home inszsllstion (SChedule D, Line 2.b)
c. Additional connection installation at time of initial installation
(SChedule D, Line
d. Additionaiconnectioninstuilationrequiringseparateinsafiation
(Schetiuie D, Line
e. Otber insasllations(specify:(ScbetidieD, Line e.2)
Item I Unwired home installation underground
Item 2
Item 3
1
22.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
Step C. Charges for Licensed Remotes
(Calculate separately for each significant different type and attach additional sheets as necktory)
Line 8.
Line 9.
Line 10.
Line 11.
Line 12.
Line 13.
Line 14.
Annual capital costs (Col. J of SChedule C)
Total maintenance/service hours (attach explanation)
Total maintenance/service ~ost (Line ~ · Line 9)
Total cost of remote (Line 8 -+- Line I0)
Number of units in service (CoL I of Schedule C)
Unit cost (Line ll/Line 12)
Rate per month (Line 13/12 months)
Remote 1 I Remote 2
5 766 ~ 0
1041 0
4,631 I 0
10,396 t 0
2,725 j 0
3.8151 0.000
0.3181 0
FCO FORM 393 - PART III, Page 2
Step D. Charges for Leased Converter Boxes
',Calculate scparatlcy for each significantly differnet type and attach additional shccta as necessary)
Line 15.
Line 16.
Line 17.
Line 18.
Line 19.
Une 20
Line 21
Annual capital costs (Col. J or Schedule C)
Total maintenance/service hours (attach explanation)
Total maintenance/service cost (Zinc 5 x Zinc 16)
Total cos% of cenverter bcog (llne 15 + Line 17)
Number of units in actwire (Cot. l of Schedule C)
Unit cost (Ljne 18/Linc tg)
Rate per month (l lnc 20/12 months)
Type 1
62,682
1
78,574
2,725
28.100
2,342
Type 2 I
0~
01
Line 2,2.
Line 23.
Line 24.
Line 25.
Line 26.
Line 27,
Line 28.
Step E. Charges for Other Leased Equipment
Annual capital costs (Col. JoE Schedule C)
Total maintcnanre/scr~icc hours (attach explanation)
Total maintenance/s~rvice cost (Line 5 x Line 23)
Total cost oE converter box (Linc 22 +Linc 23)
N umber of uaiLs in service Or # Of subs. (Col, I nf Schedn le C)
Unit cost (Line 25/zinc 26)
Ratc per month (Line 27/12 months)
ot o
ol o
ol o
OI 0
Ot 0
ol o
Oj 0
Step F. Charges for Changing Service Tiers or Equipment
Line 29. Nominal charge for cbanSjn8 sctvice tiers OR
Line 30. Uniform HSC for cban~ing sen, ire ticrs (Linc 5) OR
Line 31. Avg. charge for chan~ing service tiers (Line 5 x Av8. hottrs to change tiers)
Step G. Franchisc Area Monthly Equipment and Installation Costs for Adjnstm¢nt of Rcgttahed Service
Line 32,
Line 33,
Line 34,
Annual customer e~luipmcnt and instatlation co~ts (Line 3 + Bat 3 of Sched. C)
Adjustment of Line 32 to franchise area ieveh See instructions
Attach explanation of adjustment method.
Monthly equipment and installation COst (Zinc 33/12 months).
Enter on Worksheet ~, Zine 301,
198,104
I 198,104
16,509
FCC FORM 393 - PART 111
SCHEDULE D
AVERAGE INSTALLATION CHARGES
Cable Operator Name:
INLAND VALLEY CABLEV~SION
Franchise Authority:,
CITY OF TEMECULA
Commuaity Ualt ID (CUID):
Date: 21 -Sep-94
This form is being filed for: Basic Tier
Cable Programming Service
Unwired Home installation:
1. Average Hours per Installation (attach explanation)
2. Unwired Home Instalation Charge (Line a.1 x HSC)
Prewired Home Installation:
1. Average Hours per Installation (attach explanation)
2. Prewirad Home Instalation Charge (line b.1 x HSC)
Additional Connection Installation at Time of Initial Installation:
1, Average Hours per Additional Connection (attach explanation)
2. Additional Connection-initial Instalation Charge (Line c.1 x HSC)
Additional Connection Installation after Initial Installation:
1. Average Hoursper Additional Connection (attach explanal~on)
2. Additional Connection-Separate Instalation Charge (Line d.1 x HSC)
Other Installation (by Item Type):
Unwired Home Installation:
1, Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation)
2. item I Instalation Charge (Line e, 1 x HSC)
Trip Charge
3. Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation)
4. item 2 Instalation Charge (Line e.3 x HSC)
5. Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation)
6. Item 3 Instalation Charge (Line e.5 x HSC)
7. Average Hours per Additional Installation (attach explanation)
8. Item 4 Instalation Charge (line e.7 x HSC)
Note: For HSC (Hourly Service Charge) use amount from Line 5 of the Worksheet for C~lculating
Equipment and Installation Charges (Page 25 of FCC Form 393).
1,00
44.52
0.67
29.83
0.25
11.13
0.50
22.26
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.00
FILENAME h\1994~ACCTG\88789fc3
FCC FORM 393 - PART III
SCHEDULE A
CAPITAL COSTS OF SERVICE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT
11.25% G
A B C D E F Federal State
Equipment Groxs Book Aocum Deferred Net Book Return on Income Income
DeFt Taxes B-(C+D) Inve~tmenl Tax Tat
Vehicies 30.ro2 16208 0 13,814 I,~54 0
Toois 6,,3i~ 2,614 3,694 416
Maintenance
Facility 59,282
Drops
Other 591,480
TOTAL 687~)2
12,022 0 47,260 5317 0
193,365 398,115 44,788
224209 0 462.883 52,074
H
Cunent j
Provision for Total
Depreciation (add F,G,H)
0 5,752 7,306
631 1,047
0
0 3,100 8,417
0
56,194 100,982
0 65,677 117,751
BOX 1
SCHEDULE B
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES FOR SERVICE XN-{TALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT
(Ezdudin8 Depreei=tion)
Box 2
A B C
Equipment Gross Book A<x:um
Depr
Remote I 21,703
Remote 2
Remote 3
Cony. B~x 327.000
Cony. Box 2
Cony. Box 31
, Other l
Other I
' TOTAL 348.703
9,0~
60,495
SCHFnULE C
CAPITAL COSTS OF LEASED CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT
Tatu
D E F Fedml State
Deferred Net Book Return on Income Incomc
Tats B-(C+D) lnveumem Tat Tat
0 12,665 1,425 0
0 266,'i05 29,982 0
H
Current Total # J
Provision for of u~its Toni
Depreciation in s~rvice (add F.G,H)
0 4341 2,72~ 5.766
~ 0
I 0
0 32,700 j 2,725 ! 62,~
0
0
69,~33
279,170
31,407 0
37,041
5,450 { 08,448
Box 3
I~,01 Von ~ Aw,
S'-~,,,200
I~, Ci~' otrTn'rw',le
l. TIm P,~mrt ,n-ddm that Wmezn tx{Hfind 37 dannds mh~ d'mn 36
d-m-zsds Se~3O, lg~2. Amax~sd'.,it has d~iv~&l~v~tl~rdnmnd benci=nark.
OctoM 6,
mtmoCla cfiz~mmcd to muMai~m. zmvmam venm mpplkl to~b~,tmlilcm cmear a
Fir~' t'~..- m l~,,~e41~,~tt 9 ~ M 11G4 at ¶1o7 (Ig93). Winera bah dm the
,~akhdgFCChmidemifa~mthe,5;d~ ,imhipgmmk~itaxvut,i~shooldbc:ll~mr.~dm
an~mmml. Tbo~ll~mim~mtm~mmm~a~lmymmttobeitycammnotm~t, mcac:~ab-
cmmulsmthci,,mialdmot't~ation. ThisisqslarettyTomedmamm'eadinioethc
mcleclcd by cl,mm'gt ~ a' miniIra' dmmiBMmtm~. Ctmr, M~ m rim. e~{,
~'auc,Drmidm~bmmu~,th~axsm=~.." Iu
13, IVg]), the Cmmlrilmkm.'m'rm,'d_: "Oivu,.lt~ m,'et'l$1~{:t'uamm invuive~, m
T.
5.b. Af:~ilinclO4~qu~re~enu~oq, mlllm~)lisr~na:amy
til]l MarBen
llmP. m~mlso"~ms"~nur~rofmmimens~a:m~lsm"~lm~sby
l~%i~t~rmocxplmlllenmmlL 'r~snmofhotrllep~mtbeFetm3c~Jw~etakcn
cc: j Joimnie Giles
-~-
CERI'I~ C~S!~3~
Ljulie Ckn~.hetd~ctrlify. that ihtvc ttiia_d~Y of Oca~r,
a ~ of mc fnte~i~ m be d.iivemi by fttst clms nail, proage l~-~ia to th~ foll~vtni:
Julia
1)
4)
lieH ~TO:AB IN~B
,t
'illilllllllllllllllliiiilPlllllllllllJ. lllll! ]lJl i!
W stern Communications
M'RMORANDUM
Tot Irllel
Dout: Carl Bode0r
[to, Converter Life
Dstot August IS,1993
We curready have four different tyees of addressthee
converters dots|eyed In the field In various quantities end
colt~lurtdous. T, the early 19H'l tht Zestsh Z-tat techuolol?
wiJ JustsHad In Concord TV Clbl~ La C~teas TV Cable,
Monaroy TV Cable, add Western TV Cable. The ~-en|th
converters m bMeba~:d 'scrsutblhil for proSram jecurlgy. Tab
form of teensolely m loaf been comprombed and is no Ionlet
acute. In other wordS, the Ztnith Z~-tmc 11 J technically obsolete
device, IqlU theBib it in Still funtalent Ud usable,
WhH the Hawaii eyem was perthMud from Coeke
Cablevision, they were usjml Jetreid Toeout addressthis
converters In Hawaii i(ni, Moleks/. and LaasL Here uSain, tbb is
o buthand serumbitsI aptam and il technically obtoleu.
addresnbH!ty was reeled out on the binnd of Maul. tat decision
we usaale to ues the newer more secure tuanoinly found in tile
Paoliear BA-63:10. The raftabillty ha bun found to its very
with tile unit and If Silo quite seelife,
hj eddvescob!lty was intrudered &t Inland Volley
Cablevision and Venture County Cablevision, both lyeurea chose
to use the Silenttrio AShman SA-SdO0 unit, Tilb converter is
state-of-the- art re, secure end vetMy reliable type of device.
It would be my recommendation tat Ioinl forward. we
depreciate tile newer suchnearly eouverlorl over o ten (tO) yeor
lib, and the oilier fecundidly .n~ts over the curroot five
year fife, . This well more ac=uratdy refine wimt tim rail life
situation lL Therefore, the Zenith Z-tag and Jarreid Toeout abets
should Inert e five ).ear Itfel and the Pioneer BA.6310 and
9(40 units should have a tea year life.
i~'~.P~ C & D. IQIZDVarm~T
COl. C, RAYWID & !)I=~Vm"'PRMAN, L.L.Im.
A'FrO~NCY~ AT
mlXX)NCl
~O,l~, M,[NNIYLVAP,,~ AVINU~, ~ .W
(lOll
X'mmul Olim
~ areinKs)
il.2l
· ].lifted I~oadtas
· me Con~] .M
! XNaTAT.&AII~N telSI (m:~ Oc*___':~_ X. lieS)
· ffev Memmt B3.g3
29.87
19.14
T.?C3
22.ab 1S.B4
i4.11 7.fCI
11mmmmuM,, ~ laNO
118' $ 04Q
2m.mmpendmm wltlm,~m ~ mm¥ be mhk-mmmmd
h~erm~ D, ...... ....k4wllm ~mlm
~. Im3m mm I..m
.i,
~:: ?mme~qml bl',aZlrd laW. 345. a41. 341)
8 =:Yg~OgW~I dO Al~$ -VBOON9"B JO A!ZO : 9B:~L: ?6-ZZ-LL: IIIH X~TO:AB INgB
V'e~l' ~av. Illlie1
Nmm~bar 1, lag4
in which Inland Valley cablevision {t~s
"Companym) ham been asaemsml on its l)osmemSory In~t In ~m City
By Vty Of ack~round, ~ Coalany has a
a~rmm~tfft wJT~ ~e CIty cf Tm~la. ~ gttn~tme ~a~m
~ny ~ r~n~ to use ~e public m~rs~m and rifh~s
wi~Jn~ cit~. ~e C~pany'm ri~ht~m~a~lio
of 8a~ Dimes. T~c. v. Ccu~v
~, 182 ~l. ~p. 3d 368 t1986). On M~r 10,
~ ~ C a
v~s ~ o~ntybmemmor met ~e 1909 ~M ym r ~lum ot ~e City
Q4,EBJ,~XO. Xn ~lVi~ a~ ~e misses ~lua, C~ ~memmor used
an ~ m~oaoh,.~ ~sed h~m valua~ e che.amm~p~on
~he C4malmmr~, would pay a 10% ftanctl~em ~mm (as rent tot the
palesttory inCarest) za~her ~hm~a port, Job ot ~ S% ~tmnohlme fe
a~ll~ ~LM paid. ~ mm~ nm dis~ vl~ ~M
couLlmro~tlmd alone with a number oe other contested possesscry
interest assessments, though a% a level ~n axeass of the Company,s
position, trdl in exoese o~ r. he ~sxes prev~m,tsly pe~d.
;auL ~llst
wave z
Do~B~ No. e3-~8~, ~ g3-431, 9 Z,O.C. ~ 1164 at SlOT (1993)r
assesuan~ is dia~r~ lZ ~ ~ ~:eres~ ~ax 18
"d~Zly ~iatM ~ ~blorl~: rev~m, mu~ aS ~e ~ ~ax Is
opers=or,s inca for =he provision of ca~la service" ~ecaule
Asseasor.~14 no~us, a por~ion ci the actual 5% franClie fee being
pail ~o ~Ao City of Tmcula as the rez~t tot ~he p~ssess=ry
,~crl~ rmnum. 8~1~ ~0~.7(~) Gf =he~8 a~d Ta~=lo~
Code l~atll t~at ~e preferred valuation epprcech ~or cable
television ~ssess~ tn~sts is =o aea po~ton of ~ a~ual
frayhiss ~u u ~e eoo~c vent rail~e to 2 so My ru~l~ &~
rel&=lcns~tps and going esncern value. RSV, G Tax, Code kcUlon
107,7(d3. XC m alsc been held bytes california Co~ ot ~peal
~at~ fra~iM fM~ys for two rl~s, ~a~le~s~seo~
inCarat ~ ~ ~xable ri~= to d~ ~m~s., county a~
., (1829). If EhmAeseseor a~telF~s~oaesign r~value ~c
pg'ei~rcy, l~h an aeseammen~ msth~.ielo~'Z ~n ~
dlld lefrt~l~l.n Aku~ v, g~aaw ~m~v atom* .... ~ A~Mala
~, 1~ eal. ~. 4~ ?iS, 802, 903 (1993). In .~, ~mweseo~
Xn~et 8see~ ~8u1~ in ~he assesst of ~e value of ·
~ ~rslde e~y ca =a~ ~ ~heir in~a~ible
· mme~, the Pommm8~ %n~mrem~ amMmmn~ im m dim~i~ tax
November 21, 1994
VIA FAX & U.S. MAYL
415 - 896-0236
Mr. Johnnil Giles
Director of Governmental Affairs
West Communication
Rtncon Annexation
Post Office ~ox 193942
Sen ~Tanctsco, CA 94119
Temecula Cable Television - Review of Form 393
establishing maximum permitted basic service tier and
equipment and installa~ion rates
Dear Johnnie:
Bill Morgan and Z have carefully reviewed your letter
of October 6, 1994, responding to our review of your Form 393
establishing the maximum basic service tier rates and equipment
and installation charges for the City of Temeoula. We agree with
some of your comments, but disagree with others. on ~hat basis
Diehl, EVans prepared the enclosed revised Form 393, which
incorporates the following ohsnges from the Form 393 that was
included in Diehl, ~vans' "City of Temeoula Agreed Upon Limited
Proceaures Review of Cable T.V. Rates as of September 21, 1994":
1. ~efore addressing speci[ic issues, I must
note that our original September 21st analysis made several
significant compromises. For example, Diehi, EVans was very
o~iginal Form 393, it excluded travel time from the
determination of lns~allation and repair hours. By doing
so, it substantially reduced the ~-mher of labor hours,
thereby increasing ~he effective hourly rate. While we
believe this is an inappropriate practice, we were willing
to accept it if it would avoid · ltng~y dlspu~e,
.3RANGE: 2165.1
l~r. ~ohnnie Giles
November 21, 1994
Page 2
Another example of our willingness to compromise
was that we used the highest per unit purchase order amount
~o determine the gross hook value of converters: $120.00.
However, had we averaged the man purchase orders of
convertcars provided, a lower p~ce per unit would have
resulted.
2. Pursuant to your request, we luxve reduced the
n,~er of channels as of Sap=ember 1992, from 37 to 36, and
increased the n~m~er of channels as of September 1993 from
43 to 44. However, although we a~ree to this change as part
of a general settlement, we specifically do not a~ree with
the September 1993 channel adjustment.
In reviewing your September 1993 Channel Line Up,
Channel 28 was listed as "To 2e A~nouAoed". Yon have since
offered evidence ~t this was a community channel.
However, I note that you have not provided a chsnnel
programming schedule for September, October or November
1993. This suggests that Channel 28 was not programmed
during this time period. More importanti , the Channel Line
Up Card indicates to a subscriber~hat ~hYswasnota
programmed channel. Consequently, it is still our view that
the Septel~ber 1993 channel count should be 43, not 44,
absent an' overall compromise.
3. We have still used the Tier 1 and Tier 2 rate
cards as of the initial data of regulation, and not as of a
prior date. In our view, when =he FCC referred Co not
requiring the cable operator to "refresh" data, they were
referring to other financial date such as cost of equipment
and the like. On ~he o~er hand, r~he instructions are very
clear that the rates to be used are the rates as of the
initial date of regulation.
4. One area of significant dispute between our
approach and your approach to the ~orm 393 is the number of
remote controls and converters. In their September 21, 1994
anal sis, Diehl, Evans only counted the m~er of units in
semite for purposes of de~erminin~ gross boom value. Under
GAAP, the general rule is to compute "average costs based
only on units in service, and not those in inventory.
(Under GAAP, the nt~nber of unite to divide into total costs
is derived hy taking haginning units in inventory, adding
units purchased, less units in ending i~ventory.)
Mr. Johnnle Giles
November 21, 1994
Page 3
Your approach was to exclude inventory from the
n--~er cf un~ts in service at Col-m~ I of Schedule C, Part
III, ~u= to calc~xlate gross book at Column B of Schedule C
based on the number of units in service RZJtl the number of
Units Ln inventory. This is incorrect. According to your
October Sth letter, "the unite in inventory should also be
counted because customers are convertlanced by the ability of
an operator to icedlately install service on request and to
ieeediately replace unite while they are under repair or
removed from service.e Xssm~LnV this is true, we have
adjusted Schedule C of Part Ill, at Colons_us B and I, to
include both units actually in customers homes and those ~n
inventory. However, what we are not willing to do is to
only count the ms~er of units in service as those in
customers homes, but calculate gross book to include those
in customers homes plus ~hose In inventory. This practice
would result in an inflated price per unit. (Incidentall~,
the adjusted number of units in service, 3,321, has also
bee~ used a~ Pa~c IlI, Step C, Line 12, and Par~ IzZ, Step
D, Line 19. )
5. ~s to depreciatio~ schedules, we have always
bee~ in agreement that converters would be depreciated over
ten years. However, we main in disagreement over the
depreciation schedule for remote controls. The evidence we
were provided With from Inland ~ndicates tha~ the useful
li~e of remote control units is ~tve years, not the
years you proposed.
6. The last issue concerns treatment of the
possesscry interest tax. The FCC#s F~rst Order on
Recons~deration suggested at I 107 ~hat in certain
circumstances, if the possesscry interest tax were
calculated on intangibles, it could be passed through to
subscribers. However, it is our opinion than such a pass-
throuVh is inappropriate in this circumstance.
First, for Fiscal Year 1993-94, according the
County Assessor, the possesscry interest tax on the Teasouls
franchise was $43~59.12. Based on 9,119 basic subscribers
for the same period, this would result in a 80.395 per
subscriber per month charge (243,259.12 divided by 9,119,
divided by 12 s$0.395). Nowever, you actually charged
Subscribers $0.46 per month.
Second, assuming the tax was assessed on tangible
and intangible assetS, this would only mean ~hat the portion
Of the tax assessed on intangible assets could be passed
Mr. Johnnie Giles
November 21, 1994
Page 4
through to sttbscribers. A different formula not usin~
intangibles would still result in some lower tax, and this
a~ot~t would not be passed through. However, you passed
through the tax in its e~tirety.
Third, the Riverside Assessor does not calculate
the tax based on intangibles, because he is precluded from
doing so pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code ~ 107.7(d).
Instead, ~he Assessor capitalizes the a~nual rent, which is
the recommended approach pursuant to § 107.7(~). To
de=ereini~g a c~mpetitive re~t, the Assessor capitalized 10%
of anticipated ~ross revenues. This resulted in an essexsad
value for FY 93-94 of $9,074, 960. With a tax rate of
approximately .0146822, this results in · possessory
interest tax of approximately
Fourth, Inland appealed this tax, and ultimately
settled the appeal with the Assessor at $43,259.12 for FY
93-94. Conseq~aently, even if ~he original tax was improper
under ~ 107 of the First Order on Reconsideration, the
reduced tax is not. Rather, by settling the matter, Inland
is now precluded from challenging the method of assessment
as being based on intangible assets.
Per all of the above reasons, we decline to permit
m pass-through of =he possessor~ interest tax on =he For~
393.
We have made all of the above revisions on ~he enclosed
Form 393. The effect of making the above revisions is to reduce
~he maXima permitted basic service tier rate to $11.39, from the
then Current rate of $11.22, =he remote control charge to $0.42
from $0.50, and ~he converter charge to $2.26 from $2.59. (Note
thst we originally recommended a reduction to $11.66, $0.32 and
~2.34 respectively.) Given that this ~mou~ts to a greater
reduction than we originally proposed in the September 21st
analysis, you may wish to consider accepting our ori~inal
recommendation.
Please contact me as soon as possible as to how you
would like to proceed. For your information, the Agenda deadline
for the November 29 meeting is November ~2, so I will need your
response quickly if we hope to resolve this issue for the ~ex~
Council meeting.
Kr. Johnnie Giles
November 21, 1994
Page ~
Please feel free to call me If you should have any
~uestions or require any additional assistance. Thank you for
your continuing cooperation and courtesy An this matter.
Very truly yours,
Scott F. Field, of
B~RX~, WILLIAMS & SORENSZN
cc:
Grant Ystes, City of Temecula
William Morgan, D~ehl Evans · Company
Thcm~s Ungleub~ Inla~d Valley
Paul Glist~ Esq.
Rt~ ~A~m t.~994~c~iu~SvagFc:... ~, C')
FCC 393 - PART I
REQUEST FOR CABLE RATE APPROVAL
COVER SHEET
Community Unit lde,,tfficatioa Code
CA 1Da~-
N~nc of Cable Operator
INLAND VALLEY CABlEVISION
Ma~ing Address
City ~ State
Perso3~ to contact regardl,g this form
18 - Oct- 94
Telephone ] Fax Number
Local Frauctxisiag Authority
Cl tf OF TEMECULA
MailmS Address
City
t State [ ZIP Co&
CA
This form is bniag/'aed with respect
~ basic ate regular[oat
~ finhie programming lurvlc~ tale regainlion
If thas lonn is being filed in real~ouse to a comptabat about your cable pwgramming service rats, please snaeh · copy of the
compialnt to this cowt sheet.
'The following sections are to be compjeted after you have rnaeci out the worhheets in PARTS II and III and calcutateci
your actual attd p~tmitted rat~.
FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER AND EQUIPMENT
i Frogram Scrvice Rate
· (1) Number of cl~n~is in basic servi~e der
{2) Cu~nt ~te got ~s[c ~im tit: (~ ~t mdu~ say fna~e
: (3) Ma~mum ~U~ per ~a~l ~te: (from L~e ~, h~ 11)
(4) M~mum ~rmitt~ ~te for buic~ ~r (c~lusive ofany ~n~ fee):
{muttivt? (1) ~ (3)
23
$11.82
$0.495
$11.39
Note: 1 [' your current rnte for the basic service tier (entry 2) exceeds the maaimum pertrutted rate for that tier (ent~4), you
mgst subrnit a coat -of-service showi,mg or your basic service rate wilJ be reduced w the ffUtXiDIUm permitted level show~ in
entry 4.
Franchise ices have been excluclcd from this analysis in order to compare your monthly rate for the
basic Service tier to the maximum permitted level. whether you itemize them or not, any franchise
[ec.s you pay for the basic SeNice tier should be added to your monthly rate ms pan of the service
when billling your subscribers. See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.985.
EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION RATES
Note: You r equipment and inure listion rates for the besjc scr~ce tier m~t lid be included in your program s:rvic¢ rate for ~a
tie r, but raffisr must be complelely unbundled. In addition, those equipment sad inslalintioa rates must not exceed your saul
costs including a r~asonable profit. The method for unbuadling your cq nipmeat sod instalhtion rates from ~e bask sex'vim
pfo~grannning ra~c, (if necessary), and for determining your p~rmitted equipment and installation ratt~, is prescribed in PART
(unbundiing) and PART ftl (rate-setti"2) of this form. F. nter in the spaces below the rate figures you havc c~lculstcd in PART
of lilts form. Your xctuaJ basic scrvicc eq ~pment and installation charges may not ~xceed these rates, nithough they my be lower.
(1) Char~,~s for basic service matalia lions* (from Li~e,s
6 or ? of .F..quipmcnt land Installation Workshcct)
(a) Hourly rate OR
(b) Ave~ installation ch~r~:
1. Installation of unwired homes
2. lnstalintlonofprewiredhomes
3. lnstallationofadditionalconnetionattimeof
initial instslhtion
4. Installstionofadditlonsloonnectlons
requiring separnte insUllatlon
5. Otherinstsiintlons(speclfy)
TRIP CtlAROE
NEW INSTALL-UNDERGROUND
item 3
(2) Char~,e for ~henginI tiers (if any) (from llne
30,or 31 of Eqkfi~ment and lns~.lLg. tlon Wod~she~t)
(3) Monthly charp for lease of ren~,te controls
Line 21 in Equipment &nd Installation Work'.~hccO
Remote control ~e 1:
_Remote control type
Rolltote control u/pe ]:
(4} Monthly chsr~c ~or luase of conycrier boxes (from
_Line 14 in Equipment and lnstalhitlon Work'shell)
Converter box ty~ 1:
_Converter box type 2:
Converter box ~ 3:
ctzr tcr Ica c of 0thor equipment (lr0m
Line 28 in Equipment and Installation Worksheet)
Other equipment (specibj)
Other 2~
$29.82 $29.83 $29.82j
$11.13 $11.13 $1t.13
$22.25 $22.26 $22.25
, $0.00 $0.00 $O. OO
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 ~ $0.00 $0.00
$0.50 $0.42! $0.42
t. ~:-~: . . - , . ·. ......... ;: ....
:,;: · . ~; .. · .: ':: d~:: ,.:;:, ....:. .,-,.~
$2.~ $2.~
If you have further charges for udditlo~ai eonneaions beyond those reflected in your inst~llatlon charge, 'attach a sheet
exphinlng your calcul:,tions and setting forth those additional chnrgus. SEE Note to Equipment and tnstnllatiou Worksheel
instructions in PART IIi of this form. .'
6~ 'd
e~99SSLHL 'ON X~J
~SH~ ~ISOO S~8 6E:E[ HPl ~8-g~-AON
Nine 4.
~ Line 5-
FCC FORM 393 - PART III
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATINel EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION CHARGES
INLAND VAII FY CABLEV181ON
~CITY OF TEMECULA
Step A. Hourly Service Charge
and Service (eatdude purJ~ele gem& O[ Coatlume, r eqaipme nt)
Cairomet ¢quipatlnt aM iaaaUatior pcrenlalc (/Macit e~plenatioe)
~oBni cgitomgr quipmeat Ir,~iatenam and inllatlalion
eztludinl ~t o( leaced equipment (Line I x Lie
Total Iab~ h~ufl ~r r~ljnteelnce mad imla~l don d comemet
ect~lpmem sat~ slftlce (attach SIpS. MaleS)
Haurly strvic~ cheese (HSC) (Line 3/Liec 4)
Community Unit lED (CULL1):
Date: 1B-Oct-94
$t :7:!
$129.657.
2.912
I fine 6,
OR
Line 7.
Step B, Installation charge
Uni.rorm I.{SC tot ell inllllla,;ofil (iluert leovet from l Jan ~)
Av~te,~e cbule for iatllllktiOn type
(Sea= gJ~cdutc D for :v~lSe i~zll laden c~p ~[cuJ&doQ)
a. Unw~homei~lJozion(~h~duicD, Uaet2)
b.
(~cdule D. Uae
e. O~kr i~lia~o~ (s~[~ (khedu~ D.
hem I Uwirc~ home J~s~
29
11,~,
22,26
0,001
0,00
Step C. Charge for Licensed Rimotis
-. I Line 8.
! Line 9.
une 0.
(Lkle11.
AuuaJ fapit&l
Talal mnintenanoe/servlee houu (&tta~'t IIlmlmm~on)
Tot&l maiattenan~/ler,~ee eolt (r ;nc ~ x Line 9)
Tome COIl e~ reinate (Un~ 8 + Lint tO)
Numtp~'
Unit r~mt
Line 14,,_ RIte per manlit (Line 13/12 months)
104i
4,63t J C
6,907 ~ 0
3,-q2t I O
5.091 I 0.000
0.424 ~ 0
FCC FORM 393 - PART IlL Page 2
Step D. Charge for Lea~ecl Conyeller Boxes
(CaJcldatc neplrl/|gy fro' caek sil;~JAPmaadF dJ/feroet &Tpe sad Iilack &dd|tlonal sbcets as eeCllllf~)
'lLjrle 15, Annual ca, phiJ P, mls (CoL J oE ~chedule C)
Line 16. TNal maintnueoe/~rviec hOun (sUach mqd&lo, tloa)
Lithe17.
Re 18, Tmai east o( conytriM hag (Unn 1~ + line LT)
I Lkne 19. Number or urdtl
Line 20
Line 21 I~ per ntoudt (L,i=e 20/12 momha)
Type 1 r Type 2
76,0651 0
13,892 1 0
0
69.9S7 1 O
27.067
2.257
Line 24.
Line 25.
~Line 26.
Line 27
t Line 28.
Step E. Charges for Offier Leased Equipment
Annel/Ca;ilal COI[$ (CoL J c~ 5~eduje C)
To~l mai~e~/H~ hours (atmC~ ~aMliOn)
To~ mlnie~ m (Une 3 z UM
Toz~ ~n or con~w bm (Uric ~ + UA= 23~
Numb~ ~ u~ m ~ ~ · OESUbL (CoL I d ~ule C)
~scc ~ me, oh ~nc 27IIZ months)
0 0
0
0
0 0
04 el
Stop F, Chorgeo for Changing Service Tiers or Equipment
Line 29. Nominal c,~mr~c for cba~iml settee tiers ~
~e 30. ~ni~m HSC tar ~EIn~ e~e ti~i (U~O ~) ~
L;Re 31, ~vl, c~rgc f~ ~nl s~cc tiers (~nc ~ x A~. hoa~ m cha ale duiL
o el
~ep G, Franchise Arc& MootMy F.,qmlpmemg &rod loslallslioo Coma for Ad,tusLmcu( ot Y, efo$iLed s=enricC
Line 32.
Line 33.
Line 34.
,*ulnuit cuSlOmer eqUipment end iealali.t~on r4sLI (T jn= 3 + BC~ 3 aE,S~hcd. C)
217,g99;
1 217,999~
18,1671
FILENAME h\Ig94~ACCTG%88769fc,
FCC FORM 393 - PART III
SCHEDULE A
CAPITAL COSTS OF SERVICE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT
A 8C
8qtdpmen! ! (}roll leoOk ArCMe
',/chicle[ 30,032 16.208
To~s I 6.30~
iv[aintcna..,ce!
Facilhy .,9.282
Dfopi
TOTAL 6i7,o~2 j 2243.o~
11.25%
O E F
Tun )
0 13J14 r XJ54
3.~ j 416
0 47,~0 J ~.317
0 J 46~831
G
Tu TI
0j
SCHEDULE B
ANNUAL OPeRATZNG EXPENSB-w FOR JBKVIC~ IN'STAIJ_~,.1'[ON · MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPI,(ENT
(EIdLtdinI Dep~cdldlan)
BOX 2
SCHEDULE C
CAPITAL COSTS OF LEASED CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT
A B C
F_,quiprn,~nt i GrNs Book Ac~um
Remote , ZI,?0] ~ 9,0'ut I
Remote 2 I
Rcmote .I
Co~v. Bo~ 1 ~ 35~,~3 j &0.49.~ I
Cony, Bo~ 2 I
Conv, Bos 3 i
Other r
Other
~'~.,TA L 4 1 l,f~6 i 69,.~33 [
G
Sta~
Tax Tat
O{
0
o(
I
3,.~!
m.:u, {
J
add F.G.N)
0
76,0~
0
0
88342 l
Be~ S
FCC FORM 89,1 - PART III
SCHEDULE D
AVERAGE INSTALLATION CHARGES
Corn muad~y Uml~ ID (CUID):
Date: 18-0¢~-94
Thje form is being filed for:
Has~c T~er
~Ceble Programming Service
b.
C,
d,
Unwired Home InmMtion:
1, Average HmJrl per Installation (ett~P..tt explanetion)
2. Unwimcl Home Ins~NNion Charge {Line L1 x NeD)
Prww~rsd Home Insla/latk~n:
1, Avar'd, ge Hour~ pet installation (attach explanation.)
2, PrswirecI Home Ins~Jal~on Char ~Lino h,1 X HSC)
Additional Conne<XiOf~ tl~tNisti0n ,,~qP'ru~(Le of Initial Inmllation:
Additional Connection InstallSti0n after Initial Instml~tion;
1, Average Hours per Additional Conne~ton (e41~ch explanation)
~-. A~d'~tionai Conneetlon-~;ep~mte Insl~lation Charge (Line d.1 x HSC)
Other inlt~lla. tion (by Item Type):
Unwlred Home Inelallation:
1. Average Hourl per Additional installation (attach expjana~ion)
2, Item 1 In~lNation CharGe (Line e. t v HSC)
Tall} Charge
3, Average Hours perAdditionet lnst~llalion(atlach explanation)
4. Item 2 Insrelation Gharge (Line e,3 X H~C)
5. Average Hours per Additionill Installation (atl~eh explanatiotl}
6. Item 3 Instllatkan Charge (Une · .5 x HSC)
7. Average Hours per AOdltionN Inmllatio~q (attach explanation}
8. item 4, Inlt~kati~ Charge (Line e,7 x HSG)
Note: For HSC (Hourly $CIW~ce Clutrle),usc samoael hm L,jee .~ ot the W~kebet [or ~abtleg
1.00
44 .S2
0.67'
29.83
0,25
11.13
0,0
0,00'
0,0
0,00
Frmlchisee
Total of NumDer of Channels F_~2346
Total of Satellite Channels
1 st Calculation:
Number of Channels 35
Number of Satellites 20
Benchmark Rate I _ 0,6070~ less
Total of Number of Channels I 361
Total of Satellite Channels 24t
2nd Calculation:
Number cf Channels
Number of Satellites
35
25
Benchmark Rate ! 0.621 01 less
3rcl Calculation:
Results of 2nci Calculation:
Results of 1 st Ce. lculation:
I:\1994\ACCTG~FCC393 -4
40
20
0.539O I
Divide by
Multiply by
Increment
Subtracted from
40
25
[ 0.5510j
Divide by
Multiply by
Increment
Subtracted from
Difference
Divide by
Muffply by
Increment
Plus
6
1
0.0136
0.6070
0,59~H.
0.0700
5
1
0,0140
0.621 0
0.6070~
O. 6070 J
0.5934 !
0.0136 I
5
4
0,01091
0.59~4;
0,6043 If
36 \ 20
36\ 25
36\ 25
36\ 20
'36 \ 24
Cable Operator J INLAND
Franchisee f CITY OF TEMECULA
~1 of Number of Channels
~ ota~ of Satellite Channels
1st Calculation:
Number of Channels
Number of Satellites
Bencinmark Rate {
40
25
Total ef Number of Channels
Total of Satellite ChanneLs
2ncl Calculation:
~' bet of Channels 40
I Jet of Satellites 30
Benchmark Rate ~ 0.5620
3rd Calculation:
Results of 2nd Calculation:
ResuIls cf 1 st Calculation:
1:\1994~ACCTG\FCC393-4
45
25
0,551 01 less I 0,4970
28
less I
Divide by
Multiply by
Increment
Subtracted from
45
30
Divicle by
Multiply by
Increment
Subtracted from
Difference
Divide by
Multiply by
Increment
Plus
o. os~o 4
5
4
o. o432l
0.5510 ~
0.5~8;
5
4
0.0448j
0.5~OZ
0.5172]
o.soTsl
0.S134~t
44\ 25
44\ 30
44\ 30
44\ 25
~4\ 28
TYPE
P, Ot ~
}~0V-~1-84 ~ 15:D5 x
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER~.~!~/~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~'>~'
November 29, 1994
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 and Change of Zone No. 5598
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25063 TO SUBDIVIDE A 20 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 68 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000
FEET EAST OF CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
914480-005
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5596TO CHANGE THE EXISTING ZONING OF R-A-2~
(RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 2~ ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO R-1
(SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING) AND R-5 (OPEN SPACE) ON A 20 ACRE PARCEL
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000
FEET EAST OF CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
914480-005
BACKGROUND
This project was originally filed with the County of Riverside in September of 1989 and
subsequently transferred to the City in November of 1990. The project proposes to subdivide
a 20 acre parcel into 68 residential parcels and 1 open space parcel. The subdivision will
require a change of zone from R-A~2~ (Rural Residential, 2~ minimum parcel size) to R-1
(Single Family) and R-5 (Open Space). In November of 1991, staff recommended to the
Planning Commission that the project be denied due to concerns relative to the intensity of the
development and the compatibility with surrounding development. The Commission chose to
continue the item off-calendar at the request of the applicant.
Since 1991, the applicant of record has made no attempt to continue processing this
application. Due to the lack of activity, and the fact that the project is now inconsistent with
the General Plan land use designation of Very Low Residential, staff recommended to the
Planning Commission at their July, 1994 meeting that the project be denied. Prior to the July
meeting, staff was contacted by a potential new owner of the property who requested and
received a continuance to allow for additional review of the project. At the September 19,
1994 meeting, the commission recommended by a 4-0 vote (with one Commissioner absent)
that the Council deny the project due to the lack of activity and General Plan inconsistency.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Resolution of Denial for Tract Map 25063 - Page 3
Resolution of Denial for Change of Zone No. 5598 - Page 7
Planning Commission Staff Report - September 19, 1994 - Page 11
Planning Commission Draft Minutes - September 19, 1994 - Page 12
Planning Commission Minutes - November 18, 1991 - Page 13
R;~TAPFP-J~.50~,CC 11/~1,~4 ~ 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 25063 TO SUBDIVIDE A 20 ACRE PARCh-t, INTO
68 SINGT,F, FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT
LOCATED ON ~ SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF CALLE GIRASOL
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEI, NO. 914-480-005
WI~'FREAS, David Mulvaney filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 in
accordance with the Riverside County General Plan, Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WBEREAS, the application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 was not
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law due to the applicant' s failure
to make timely submittals;
WI~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on November 18, 1991, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WlltK~REAS, at the public hearing, the Commission continued Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 25063 off-calendar;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on June 6, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the item was continued to the July 18, 1994 Planning
Commission meeting;
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on July 18, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WI~REAS, at the public hearing, the item was continued to the September 19, 1994
Planning Commission meeting;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063;
R:k~TA$.CC 11121/94
W~ERF_,AS, the City Council considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 on
September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public heating as proscribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, TItEREFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RV-~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are t~'ue and correct.
Section 2. ~ The City Council in denying the proposed Tentative Map, makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit
all required information in a timely manner. Thereforo, the project could not be deemed
complete in accordance with State and local law,
2. Because the proposed density is inconsistent with the City's adopted
General Plan, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency
disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project.
Section 4. City Council Action. Based upon the findings set forth above and the
evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby denies Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 25063.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 291h day of November, 1994.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
R:~'TAF'FRFrXl,.~.CC 11/21194 Irab 5
I I:[RRI~,By CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 29th day of
November, 1994 by the foilowing vote of the Council:
COUNCILlVlFmMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNES. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:kq'rAFFRFrI~e.CC 11/21/94
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION NO. 94.-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TElVIECULA DENYING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. :5~93
TO CHANGE ~ EXISTING ZONING OF RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL 2% ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE TO
SINGLE FAlVI~,Y DWFJJJNG AND OPEN SPACE ON A 20
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF
CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 914-480-005
WI~REAS, David Mulvaney filed Change of Zone No. 5593 in accordance with the
Riverside County General PIE, Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adoptexl by reference;
WI:tF~REAS, the Change of Zone application was not processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law due to the applicant's failure to make timely submittals;
WI~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on
November 18, 1991, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Commission continued Change of Zone No. 5598
off-calendar;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on June
6, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WI~REAS, at the public hearing, Change of Zone No. 5598 was continued to the July
18, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on July 18,
1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, Change of Zone No. 5598 was continued to the
September 19, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on
September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition:
WItEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied
Change of Zone No. 5598;
R:~TAFFRFFaS0~.CC 11/11~ ~ 8
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on November 29,
1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, ~RE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TF_,MECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are Wae and ~rrect.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Change of
Zone, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit
all required information in a timely manner so that the project could not be deemed complete
in accordance with State and local law.
2. Because the proposed zoning designations are inconsistent with the City's
adopted General Plan, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the
General Plan.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency
disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project.
Section 4. City Council. Based upon the findings set forth above and the evidence
presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby denies said application for Change of
Zone No. 5593.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of November, 1994.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATfbST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
R:WrAFFRFI'~J0~.CC 11/21/94 klb 9
I HEREBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 291h day of
November, 1994 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCILIvm, MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILlvm~MBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMI~,MBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:X~TAFFRFIX25063.CC 11r21/94 lab ~lO
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
R:~STA~.CC 11/21/94 ~rh 11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 19, 1994
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 and Change of Zone No, 5598
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- denying Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 25063 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report; and
APPLICATION INFORMATION
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- denying of Change of Zone
No. 5598 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained
in the Staff Report
APPLICANT:
David Mulvaney
PROPOSAL:
Subdivide 20 acres into 68 resioential lots and one open
space lot and a Change of Zone ReQuest from R-A-2Y=
(Residential Agricultural 2Y= acre minimum parcel size) to
R-1 (One-Family Dwelling) and R-5 (Open Space).
LOCATION:
South side of Nicolas Road approximately 2000 feet east
of Calle Girasol.
EXISTING ZONING:
R-A-2 ~ (Residential Agricultural-2 ~ acre minimum parcel
size)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-A-21/= (Residential Agricultural, 21/2 acre
minimum lot size)
R-A-2¼ Residential Agricultural, 21/2 acre
minimum lot size)
R-A-2Y= (Residential Agricultural, 2~ acre
minimum lot size)
R-A-2~ (Residential Agricultural, 2~ acre
minimum lot size)
PROPOSED ZONING:
R-1 (Single Family Residential, 7,200 square foot
minimum lot size) and R-5 (Open Space)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacent
R:~STAFFRPT~25063.PC3 9/14194 Idb
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Large Lot Rural Residential (2~ acre
minimum parcels)
Large Lot Rural Residential (2~ acre
minimum parcels)
Large Lot Rural Residential (2~ acre
minimum parcels)
Large Lot Rural Residential (2~ acre
minimum parcels)
PROJECT STATISTICS
GROSS AREA:
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
PROPOSED DENSITY:
20 acres
69 (68 residential lots and 1 open space lot)
7,200 square feet
3.4 dwelling units per acre
BACKGROUND
This project was originally filed with the Riverside County Planning Department on September
15, 1989. The project was transferred to the City of Temecula in May 1990. In November
of 1991, staff recommended to the Planning Commission that this project be denied due to
concerns relative to the intensity of the development and the compatibility with surrounding
development. The Commission chose to continue the item off-calendar at the request of the
applicant. Since that time, the applicant of record has not continued the processing of the
application.
On June 6, 1994, this item was before the Planning Commission. The item was continued
to the July 18, 1994 Commission meeting to provide for additional public noticing. On July
18, 1994, the item was again before the Commission. Subsequent to the June 6 meeting and
prior to the July 18 meeting, staff was informed that there was a new owner of the project
who would submit a letter to the Commission requesting a continuance of this item. Staff
elected to delay the noticing of the project until the continuance request was delivered.
However, neither the new owner, nor their representative, has requested in writing that the
item be continued or given a justification for an additional continuance. Further, the new
owner has not attempted to meet with staff to re-start the processing of this project.
Therefore, staff noticed the item for the September 19, 1994 meeting.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 is a proposed 68 lot residential subdivision and one
open space/park lot on a 20acre parcel located on the south side of Nicolas Road east of Calle
Girasol, This project has been filed in conjunction with Change of Zone No. 5598 requesting
a change in zoning classification from R-A-2~ to R-1 and R-5 for the site, Approval of the
attendant zone change request is required to establish the Vesting Tentative Tract Map as
currently designed.
ANALYSIS
The proposed R-1 and R-5 zoning designations are inconsistent with the City's General Plan
land use designation of Very Low Residential. The owner of record for the site has made no
R:'~STAFFRPT%25063,pC3 9/14194. klb 2
attempt to continue the processing of the project over the past 35 months. Planning staff has
attempted to contact the owner of record (see attached letter) to either withdraw the project
or go forward to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial. The owner of
record of the project has never responded to staff.
Staff has been informed that there is a new owner of the project. The new owner's
representative has requested that the project again be continued off-calendar. Due to the
inconsistency with the General Plan, the fact that the project has been incomplete for almost
three years and the lack of activity on the project over the past three years, staff recommends
that the project be denied. Should the new owner wish to pursue a development project on
this site, the new owner would need to file new applications with the Planning Department
that are consistent with the City's General Plan.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The site is zoned R-A-2~ (Residential Agricultural, 2~ acre minimum lot size} and the General
Plan Designation is Very Low Residential (.2-.4dwel}ing units per acre) and R-5 (Open Space}.
The proposal is inconsistent with both the Zoning and General Plan Designation.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply
to projects which a public agency disapproves. Therefore, no environmental analysis was
performed for this project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The application has been incomplete for approximately 35 months. During this time the
applicant\owner of record has made no attempt to continue the processing of the project. The
project is inconsistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Code and is not compatible with
surrounding development in the area. It is for these reasons that staff is recommending the
project be denied without prejudice,
FINDINGS - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063
The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable requirements of state
law and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit all required
information in a timely manner. therefore, the project could not be deemed complete
in accordance with State and local law.
The proposed density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre exceeds the General Plan Land Use
Designation of .2 - .4 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, staff cannot make the
necessary finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan.
FINDINGS - Change of Zone No. 5598
The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable requirements of state
law and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit all required
information in a timely manner. therefore, the project could not be deemed complete
in accordance with State and local law.
R:\~TAFFRPT~25083.PC3 9/14/~4 ldb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94.-~
R:\STAFFRPT%25063.PC3 9/13194 Idb 5
PC RESOLU'I~ON NO.
A RI~OLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2~063 TO SUBDIVIDE A 20
ACRE PARCEL INTO 68 SINGLE FAM~-Y LOTS AND ONE
OPEN SPACE LOT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NICOLAS ROAD APFROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF
C.&Y-I,E GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSF_SSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 914-480-005
~, David .Muirahoy filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 in
accordance with the Riverside County General Plan, hnd Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, the application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 was not
processed in the time and manner prescribed by Stare and local hw due to the applicant's failure
to make timely submittals;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission censidered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on November 18, 1991, at a duly noticed public hearing as presc. xibed by law, at which
time intorested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Commission continued Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 25063 off-calendar;
WI:FEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on June 6, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the item was continued to the luly 18, 1994 Plmming
Commission meeting;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on luly 18, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
~, at the public hearing, the item was continued to the September 19, 1994
Planning Commission meeting;
~S, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, ~ORE, TH'F. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THT~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RF~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
R:\STAFFF~TX25083,pC3 9120/9¢ klb 6
Section 1. That the above recitations are l~-ue and correct.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Tentative
Map, m~lt~s the following findings, to wit:
(1) The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit
all required information in a timely manner. The~fore, the project could not be d~med
complete in accordance with State and local hw.
(2) Because the proposed density is inconsistent with the City's adopted
General Plan, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan.
Seaion 3. Bnvironmental Conlpliance. Per Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CBQA), CBQA does not apply to pwjects which a public agency
disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project.
Section 4. Planning Commission Action. Based upon the findings set forth above and
the evidence pr~rtted at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby denies Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 25063,
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of Sept~mbcr, 1994.
STEVEN F. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I RRRRRy CERTIYY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of
September, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNNT[J_
SECR.ETARY
R:\STAFFPFr~50~a.PC3 9/20/94 klb 7
PC I~Y-~OLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF Tffg PLANNING CO1VIMBSION OF
~ crrY OF TEMECULA DENYING CHANGE OF ZONE
NO. 5593 TO CHANGE ~ EXIgTING ZONING OF
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 2x~4 ACRE MINIMUM
PARCRI. SIZE TO SINGLE FAMn.Y DW~'JI-~NG AND
OPEN SPACE ON A 20 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON T~rR
SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000
FEET EAST OF C,~IJ-R GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS
ASSE, SSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-480-005
WI~'IEAS, David Mulvaney filed Change of Zone No. 5593 in accordance with the
Riverside County General Plan, Land U~e and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
~AS, the Change of Zone application was not processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law due to the applicant's failure w make timely submittals;
WRmlEAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on
November 18, 1991, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WltV-REAS, at the public hearing, the Commission continued Change of Zone No. 5598
off-calendar;
W1TRREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on June
6, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as presaibed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WRV-REAS, at the public hearing, Change of Zone No. 5598 was continued to the July
18, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
~AS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on luly 18,
1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WRI~EAS, at the public hearing, Change of Zone No. 5598 was continued to the
September 19, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
WI~.REAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5598 on
September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, THRRRPORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
IIMli;CLI.A DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJI]WS:
R:%STAFFRP'T't25063,pC3 9/20/94 klb 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:~,STAFFRPT~5063.PC3 9/13194. kib 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25063 & CHANGE OF ZONE 5598
EXHIBIT- A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
R:~STAFFRPT~25063,PC3 9/1319~- kJb
CITY OF TEMECULA
i SITE
OS
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION - VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (.2-.4 DU PER ACRE)
EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - R-R-2~ (RURAL RESIDENTIAL, 21/= ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE)
CASE NO. - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25063 & CHANGE OF ZONE 5598
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994.
R:\STAFFRPT~25063.PC3 9/13/9.~ kJb
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
L~ ~ I ER TO OWNER
R:\STAFFRPT~25063.PC3 9/13/94 klb 11
s n 90
' ., ~L .'
March 22, 1994
1909} 694-1989 · FAX 1909} 694-1999
David Mulvany
316 Forest Avenue, Suite 205
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Subject: Tentative Vesting Map No. 25063
Dear Mr. Mulvany:
As you may recall, at the November 18, 1991 City of Temecula planning Commission
meeting, you requested a continuation off calendar to allow you time to address issues
associated with your application for Tentative Vesting Map No. 25063. To date, the City
has not received a response from either you or your representative.
ff you wish to process the above referenced map, you will need to re-f~e your application
and pay the appropmte fees. Should you wish not to process the map, you will need to
inform the City in writing of you intent to withdraw your previous application. ff the City
does not receive a response from you by April 11, 1994, the application will be scheduled
for the next planning Commission meeting with a recommendation of denial without
prejudice.
Should you have any questions about the above information, please call me at (909) 694-
6400.
Sincerely,
Assistant Planner
cc: Larry Markham, Markham & Associates
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
R:\STAFFRIri'~5063.CC 11r21/9~ Ir~ 12
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
7.
DRAFT
CH ae of Zone No, 26
Assistan lanner Matthew Fagan presented the
Chairman Ford ned the pub ~c
,Ssioner seconded by Commissioner Slaven to close
the public hearing and recomr Negative Declaration for Change
of Zone No. 26 and Ad4 >lution No. 94-29 recommending the adoption of
Ordinance No. 94- am map of the City of Temecula for
Change of Zone Ap No."2E based on the analysis and findings contained in
the staff report.
The
AYE,~ 4
0
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS: Blair
Vestina Tract MaD No. 25063 and Chanae of Zone No, 5598
Director Thornhill advised the Commission the applicant has submitted a request for
continuance on this item.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised staff has
received one letter in opposition to the proposed project from Alfred and Judith
DeForrest and Conhie Miller.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing.
Larry Markham, of Markham Associates, advised that the property is currently under
ownership of the FDIC. He said the property is currently in escrow and the
purchaser has been made aware of the general plan designation on the property and
that staff is putting together a special study requirement. Mr. Markham requested a
continuance off calendar until the special study has been completed.
Director Thornhill advised that consultants have been interviewed for the special
study of the Nicolas Valley area and staff anticipates it will take five to six months
to complete the study,
Jim Miller, 39355 Pourroy Road, Temecula, expressed his opposition to the
proposed project densities.
DRAFT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEFTEMBER 19, 1994
Mike KnowIron, 39130 Pale Vista Road, Temecula, expressed opposition to the
proposed project density and presented a petition of opposition from the
surrounding property owners.
Commissioner Slaven said she understands the issue before both the property
owners and the residents surrounding the property, however she said she supports
staff's recommendation for denial.
Commissioner Fahey said the proposed project is not in compliance with the General
Plan and probably will not be in compliance as a result of the special study.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Slaven to close
the public hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 94-30 denying Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 25063 and Adopt Resolution No. 94-31 denying Change of Zone No. 5598
based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
,,~PA94-0017
'lanning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
their
;ioner Webster asked if the County has provided any
the fees.
regarding
Director Thornhill the City has been in disa with the County
regarding fees since ty's incorporation the position that once it
incorporated and was the levels ~pments, the City
should collect the fees. believes the clause that is contained
in the Development Agreements negotiated with the County is improper.
Assistant City
position
Attorney's office has
to Development,
that once '
develc
said has been consistent in their
to fees as a : contract law. The City
the provisions of as it pertains
incorporation and has determined
the City is entitled to 100% of the He added that the
agreed to provide funds to defend the City's the City
defense of their position on the fees.
Ford opened the public hearing.
PCMINO9118194. 5 09128/)4
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES- NOVEMBER 18, 1991
R:',STAFFRJr~25(}63.CC 11/21194 kib 13
remain a pole sign or a monument sign.
the
~BSIONERCHINIAEFF suggested that staff work the
applicant. Commissioner Chiniaeff adde
icant needed to push to get the freeway
from Cal Trans.
that
e
DOUG
With the
resources
at
offered that staff would be wi!2 to work
Licant and direct him to ~riate
1 Trans to look at the fre signs.
CHAIRMAN moved to appro~ the spandr.!,
removing the band 'on the side of the
building and sign as was proposed
with the exception lowering a height visible
under the fro.way west on Highway 79 on a
pedestal mount to based on the
findings contained in report and make an
additional finding that it consistent with the future
general plan making at heights that are
workable and in reasonak with state law and
the sign that is )rop mt be a detriment or
interfere with the g plan of the City,
seconded by COMMIS~ FORD.
AYES: 3 Ford,
Leff, Mea~lane
NOES: 0 None
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Blair
I COMMISSIONERS: Fahey
Fahey arrived at 6:25 P.M. and was no ~r
]idered absent.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4. CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5598 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25063
.1
Proposal to change zone classification from R-R-2 1/2 to
R-1 and subdivide 20 acres into 68 residential lots and
1 open space lot.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stepped down due to a conflict of
interest.
GARY TBOI~HILL advised that the applicant has requested
a continuance to February 17, 1992, and staff is
concerned with the length of time requested. He added
that staff failed to see what compelling reasons .may
PCMINll/18/91
-3- n/20/9~
PL~a~N~G CO~SS~OM
NOVEMBER 18, 1991
exist in t_hat point in time that may not exist today that
would change staff's reco~endation.
C~ES PAY s~mmarized the staff report.
C~l~HOAGI~opened the public hearing at 6:35 P.M.
L~Y M3~, Mar~/~am & Associates, 41750 Winchester
Road, Temecula, representing the applicant, advised that
the project is having financial difficulties which has
precluded proceeding foz~ard with the processing;
however, there were also overriding general plan issues
in the area involved. Mar. Markham added that this area
had received several approvals for R-1 type densities and
this was one of two projects in the area, the other sent
back by the council to wait for the general plan. Mr.
Mar~_ham stated that they expect the financial
difficulties to be resolved in the next three months,
which may coincide with the land use portion of the
general plan and may offer some answers to the density
guestions.
S~vm DO~F. ES, 39055 Liefor Road, Temecula, supported
the proposed zone change, and stated that R-1 is
consistent with what his idea of the area would be.
JOHN FLAHIPF, 39918 Amberly Circle, Temecula, pastor of
the Christ Presbyterian Church that owns the property at
the corner of Liefer and Nicolas, spoke in favor of the
project and added that Tim Timmons, pastor of Rancho
Christian Church, and pastor George Simmons, Temecula
House of Praise, also supported the project.
DENNIS FITZ, 39910 Jeffrey Heights Road, Temecula,
overlooks the parcel, and spoke in opposition to the
proposed project density. Mr. Fitz submitted a letter of
opposition.
COMMISSIO~TER FAH~Y stated that there were enough
unanswered questions about what this area is going to
look like to support the request for continuance;
however, it is not certain that they will be answered
enough by February to address this project beyond a
denial. Com/nissioner Fahey moved to continue off
calendar, at the request of the applicant, to February,
seconded by CHAIRMEN HOAGLAND.
COMMISSIONER PORD asked what were the consequences of a
continuance and a time as far as the mapping process and
being able to work out some of the questions and also as
PCMINll/18/91
-4- 11/20/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 18, 1991
far as being able to look at the general plan.
GARY THOI~N~ILL advised that he did not see any problem
with a continuance; however, with past history in this
area and the actions by the Commission and the Council,
this project seemed inconsistent with respect to parcel
size.
ROBERT RIGHETTI stated that in the process of reviewing
this project, staff did write-up a number of conditions
on this project and explained them as follows, to give
the Commission an idea of the magnitude of some of the
improvements that would be associated with the project:
all streets would be required to be improved fully within
the boundaries of the subdivision; on the east and west
side boundary lines, in the channel that is to traverse
the property, engineering will require that a bridge be
constructed in order to provide both primary and
secondary access. That would require that two bridges be
constructed within that subdivision; improvements to the
channel along the park site which will require some
substantial grading both on the boundary of this site and
off; the drainage course that does traverse the project,
about two thirds northerly, will require some off site
improvements as well, in order to make this site work;
the secondary access that would be provided to the east
and then come back to the north to line up with Leifer
Road would require working into the property next door;
required project to provide paving all the way to the
existing paving (Calle Medusa) that will require a
substantial amount of off site work; if they do not
provide onsite septic systems, they will have to provide
offsite facilities, a sewer line. All of these
requirements amount to a sizeable investment, which would
have to be offset by the price of the homes.
CHAIRMAN BOaGLAND stated that he would be willing to
honor the applicant's request for a continuance; however,
he added that he was reluctant making decisions on
changes of zones prior to completion of the general plan.
Chairman Hoagland added that he would support the
continuance under the condition that it is the
applicant's responsibility to bring the item back before
the Commission. Additionally, Chairman Hoagland
questioned the cost of processing the item over again.
GARY THORNHILL stated that if the applicant does not
substantially change the application, staff will process
it; however, if the application substantially changes,
then staff would look at reprocessing fees.
PCMINll/18/91 -5- 11/20/91
PLANNTN3 COMMIBSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 18, 1991
COMMISSIONER FAHEY added that if the Commission doesn't
have a clear direction on land uses in this area, she
would hesitate to address zone changes for this area.
AYES= 3 COMMISSIONERS= Fahey, Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
I~BSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair
ABSTAIN=I COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF rejoined the Commission.
TELEVISION/RADIO I~NTENNA ORDINANCE
d
AYES: COMMISSIONERS= FHah/gfaI~rd, Chiniaeff,
NOES= 0 C ISSIONERS: /None
CHAI NOAGLANDo ened ~he ublic h ' t V'00 P M
PCM~ll/18/91 -6- 11/20/91
ITEM 14
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGE~IE~/~
\
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning/~''
November 29, 1994
Change of Zone Application No. 26 - A Change of Zone for a 21.4 acre parcel
from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size) to C-O
(Commercial Office) and R-5 (Open Space)
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 26.
2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-._
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION NO. 26, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL
OFFICE) AND R-5 (OPEN SPACE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE
PARK DRIVE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 940-310-014
BACKGROUND
This project was originally before the Planning Commission on June 6, 1994. At that meeting,
staff recommended that the project be denied due to the project's inconsistency with the
General Plan. The original proposal requested a zoning designation of Manufacturing Service
Commercial (M-SC). Because the General Plan does not contain e Land Use Designation that
is similar to the M-SC zone, staff determined that the project was inconsistent with the
General Plan. The project proponent requested that the project be continued so that the
proposal could be brought into conformance with the General Plan.
On September 19, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the Change of Zone by a 5-0 vote. While the Commission did express a concern
regarding the fact that the project was seeking a zoning designation of Commercial Office
which may provide for future uses that would be inconsistent with the General Plan land use
designation of Professional Office, based upon staff's analysis, the Commission's concerns
R:~TAFFRjrf~L"'Z.CC 11/~1/~4 lr. lb 1
were alleviated. The Commission felt that the Change of Zone request is consistent with the
both City's General Plan land use designation of Professional Office and the proposed zoning
designation of Commercial Office. Commercial Office zone uses are likely to be similar to uses
allowed in the Professional Office land use designation. This determination is based upon
conducting a review of Commercial Office uses permitted in Section 9.72 of Ordinance No.
348 and those uses contained in both the City's General Plan and Draft Development Code.
According to the General Plan, the Professional Office designation includes primarily single or
multi-tenant offices and may include supporting uses. Office developments are intended to
include low rise offices situated in a landscaped garden arrangement and may include mid-rise
structures at appropriate locations. Typical uses include legal, design, engineering or medical
offices, corporate and governmental offices, and community facilities. Supporting
convenience retail and personal service commercial uses may be permitted to serve the needs
of the on-site employees.
Finally, an Initial Study was conducted for the Change of Zone request and a Negative
Declaration is recommended for adoption. The Change of Zone request will not immediately
result in the potential for impacts; however, the request may facilitate impacts when future
projects are realized on the site. Future impacts will be addressed and mitigated when
development is proposed for this site.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ordinance No. 94- to Approve Change of Zone No. 26 - Page 3
Planning Commission Draft Minutes - September 19, 1994 - Page 6
Planning Commission Draft Minutes - June 6, 1994 - Page 7
Planning Commission Staff Report - September 19, 1994- Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report - June 6, 1994 - Page 9
R:~TAFI~t~r~6CZ.CC 11/21/94
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
R:~TAFFi~.CC 11~1~ k~ ~
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 291h day of November,
1994.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATI'~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the forego'rag Ordinance No. 9 __ was duly introducea and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the 291h day of November, 1994, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Pemr Thorson
City Attorney
R:XSTAFFRPT~6CZ.CC 11r21/9~ ~ 5
*\
o ,, ~-,
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
DRAFT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
Chanoe of Zone No. 26
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Slaven to close
the public hearing and recommend Adoption of the Negative Declaration for Change
of Zone No. 26 and Adopt Resolution No. 94-29 recommending the adoption of
Ordinance No. 94- amending the offical zoning mal~ of the City of Temecula for
Change of Zone Al~plication No. 26 based on the analysis and findings contained in
the staff report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
Vestina Tract MaD No. 25063 end Chanae of Zone No. 5598
Thornhill advised the Commission the applicant has sub ' ed a request for
uance on this item.
DeForrest and .. Miller.
Chairman Ford opened ,lic hearing/~/
Larry Markham, of advised that the property is currently under
ownership of the FDIC. He sai~ ~perty is currently in escrow and the
purchaser has '/ plan designation on the property and
that staff is putting toge~'~r a special uirement. Mr. Markham requested a
continuance off calendar until the special stud been completed.
Director Thorrd~ll advised that consultants have pecial
~m Miller, 39355 Pourroy Road, Temecula, expressed his opl: ~ the
~ed project densities.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES - JUNE 6, 1994
R:~STAF~.CC 11/21/94 klb 7
DRAFT
;OMMISSlON MINUTES JUN 6. 1994
ra City Attorney Greg Diaz said the I~roblem could be resolve a real estate
,twasmoved
direction to al based on ideas p~f'~rward by the Commission.
/
~ ol
Planning Director Gary the '~m c u d be approved at this hearing with
direction that a condition added, ~a~eptable to the Planning Director and City
Attorney, including ~ ~ct to violation of the condition.
Commissioner Hoa
motion.
It was moved by Blai~
public hearing at 7.'.~;X6~'P.M. and
Application No. P~3-0067, directing
a condition requ,~g a parking agreement
of the conditior~
The motio~ as ca ried as follows:
w r
by Commissioner Hoagland to close the
No. 94-16 approving Planning
Director and City Attorney to add
;]e with respect to violation
AYES." 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Hoagland,
pES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey
4. Chanae of Zone No. 26
Ford
Prol~osal to change the existing zoning from Residential Agriculture, 20 acre minimum
parcel size (R-A-20)to Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-C) and Open Space (OS).
Located at the Southwesterly corner of Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commission Salyer to continue
this item off calendar.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland, Salyer, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey
ATTACHMENT NO. 4.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 19, 1994
Change of Zone No. 26
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recummends the Planning
Commission:
RECOMMEND Adoption of the r~egative Declaration for
Change of Zone No. 26; and
APPLICATION INFORMATION
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- recommending the
adoption of Ordinance No. 94- amending the official
zoning map of the City of Temecula for Change of Zone
Application No. 26 based upon ~'.,e Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICANT:
Drake Kennedy & Brian Kennedy
REPRESENTATIVE:
Markham and Associates
PROPOSAL:
Change of Zone Request for a 21.4 acre parcel from R-A-20
(Residential Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size) to C-O
(Commercial Office) and R-5 (Open Spat:e)
LOCATION:
The southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ridge Park
Drive
EXISTING ZONING:
R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC)
Open Space (R-5)
Industrial Park(l-P)
County of Riverside
PROPOSED ZONING:
C-O (Commercial Office & R-5 (Open Space)
GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION:
Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Light Industrial
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: County of Riverside
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area: 21.4 acres
BACKGROUND
The application for Change of Zone No. 26 was submitted to the Planning Department on
August 12, 1992 requesting a zoning designation of Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-
SC) and Open Space (R-5). The applicants were informed that the M-SC (Manufacturing
Service Commercial) zoning request was inconsistent with the City's Draft General Plan and
that staff could not support their request. The applicants then requested the processing of
their application be suspended until the City adopted the General Plan. As part of the General
Plan process, the applicants requested and received a General Plan Land Use Designation of
Professional Office for the subject property.
Once the General Plan was adopted, the applicants were given the option of withdrawing their
application, changing the application or going forward to the Commission with a
recommendation of denial. Because the applicants did not respond to staff's requests, the
item was before the Planning Commission on June 6, 1994, with a recommendation of denial.
At the June 6 meeting, the applicants' representative requested the item be continued so that
the applicants coutd revise their zone change request to be in conformance with the City's
General Plan.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Zone Change is a request for the redesignation of a 21.4 acre parcel from R-Ao20
(Residential Agricultural, 20 acre minimum parcel size) to C-O (Commercial Office) and R-5
(Open Space). No applications for development of the property have been filed with the
rezoning request.
ANALYSIS
Area Comoatibilitv
The vacant project site is located in the foothills of the westerly portion of the City. To the
north and east are developed office and industrial buildings. The property to the south is in
open space and to the west is vacant, large lot (10 acre minimum parcel size) residential land.
The portion of the site that is proposed to be zoned C-O is adjacent to the developed office
and industrial buildings. The R-5 portion of the site is adjacent to the southerly open space
and the westerly low-density residential area, It is for these reasons that staff feels this
proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
General Plan Consistency
The site is currently zoned R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural, 20 acre minimum parcel size) and
the General Plan Land Use Designation is P-O (Professional Office). The Change of Zone
request is for a redesignation of the site from R-A-20 to C-O (Commercial Office) and R-5
(Open Space). Commercial Office zone uses are likely to be similar to uses allowed in the
Professional Office land use designation. This determination is based upon conducting a
review of Commercial Office uses permitted in Section 9.72 of Ordinance No. 348 and those
uses contained in both the City's General Plan and Draft Development Code. According to the
General Plan, the Professional Office designation includes primarily single or multi-tenant
offices and may include supporting uses. Office developments are intended to include low rise
offices situated in a landscaped garden arrangement and may include mid-rise structures at
appropriate locations. Typical uses include legal, design, engineering or medical offices,
corporate and governmental offices, and community facilities. Supporting convenience retail
and personal service commercial uses may be permitted to serve the needs of the on-site
employees.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The site is currently zoned R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural, 20 acre minimum parcel size) and
the General Plan Land Use Designation is P-O (Professional Office). The Change of Zone
request is for a redesignation of the site from R-A-20 to C-O (Commercial Office) and R-5
(Open Space). Uses listed in the Section 9.72 of Ordinance No. 348 are similar in nature to
those listed in the General Plan. If a development project is submitted prior to the adoption
of the City's Development Code, the project will be reviewed to determine if it is likely to be
consistent with the Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An initial Study was completed by Staff for this project. Staff has determined through their
analysis that the Change of Zone request will not immediately have an effect upon the
environment; however, it may facilitate future impacts. Through preparation of the Initial
Study, staff looked at a maximum development scenario for any future development on the
site and identified potential impacts and measures to mitigate them (see Section III of
Attachment No. 4: Initial Study). Any potential impacts from future development on the site
will be required to be mitigated to a level less than significant. Staff therefore recommends
that a Negative Declaration be adopted for the Change of Zone proposal.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Chan9e of Zone No. 26 is a request for a redesignation of a 21.4 acre parcel from R-A-20
(Residential Agricultural, 20 acre minimum parcel size) to C-O (Commercial Office) and
(Open Space). Based upon staff's analysis, the Change of Zone request is consistent with the
City's General Plan land use designation of Professional Office. An Initial Study was
conducted for the Change of Zone request and a Negative Declaration is recommended for
adoption. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in the potential for impacts;
however, the request may facilitate impacts when future projects are realized on the site.
9/13/94 VJb 3
FINDINGS
The proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impacts
to the environment will result from the Change of Zone. Impacts from future
development can be mitigated to a level less than significant.
The zone change is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use designation of
Professional Office for the site. It is likely that Commercial Office uses will ultimately
be consistent with the Professional Office designation. The uses are similar in both
Ordinance No, 348 and the draft General Plan.
The site of the proposed Change of Zone is suitable to accommodate all the land uses
currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the parcel is of
adequate size and shape for any proposed use, Section 9,75 ,a. of Ordinance No, 348
(Development Standards for Commercial Office) requires no minimum size for lot area.
Landscaping, parking and lot coverage requirements will be met upon ultimate
submittal of a development proposal.
Said findings are supported by analysis, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution - Blue Page
Draft Ordinance No. 94-
Initial Study - Blue Page
Exhibits - Blue Page
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Change of Zone Exhibit
~ Blue Page
A'FFACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-
ATfACHIviENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A I~I~-~OLUTION OF TIIF~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THF. CITY OF
TEMECULA RECO~ING AFPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 94-
~ING TWF~ OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ~ C1TY FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 26, CHANGING THE ZONE
FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE lVIINIMUM
PARCEL SIZE) TO C~O (CO1VIMERCIAL OFFICE) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON ~ SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF RANClIO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 940-310.-014
~, Brain Kennedy and Drake I~nnedy filed Change of Zone No. 26 in
accordance with the Riverside County Genea~l Plan, 1 ~nd Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WltERE~, Change of Zone No. 26 was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 26 on June 6,
1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WItY. REAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission continued
the item to the September 19, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
~S, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 26 on September
19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opponuhity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WI~.REAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Change of Zone No. 26;
NOW, Tm~F. FORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations arc truc and correct.
R:'SIAFFIWra6C~I'C2 9r20~ klb 6
section m. F_inakn
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 26,
makes the following findings, to wit:
(1) The proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No immediate impa~ts to the
environment will result from the Change of Zone. Impacts from future development can be
mitigated to a l~vel less than significant.
(2) The zone change is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use
designation for the sit--. It is ]il~ely that Commercial Office uses will ultimately be consistent
with the Professional Office designation. The uses are similar in both Ordinance No. 348 and
the draft General Plan.
(3) The sire of the proposed Change of Zone is suitable to accommodate all
the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due to the fact that the parcel
is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. Section 9.75.a. of Ordinance No. 348
(Development Standards for Commercial Office) requires no minimum size for lot area.
1 ~ndscaping, parking and lot coverage requirements will be met upon ultimate submittal of a
development proposal.
(4) Said findings am supported by analysis, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project
which determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, no significant impact would immediately result to the natural or built environment
in the City. Future development of the site my result in impacts to the environment, however,
these can be mitigated to a level less than significant at the project development review stage.
Section 4. Planning Commission Recommendation, Based upon the the findings set
forth above, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Change of
Zone No. 26 and adopt the Ordinance reflecting the same.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEr. this 19th day of September, 1994.
STEVEN I. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I tl]~,Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular m~ting thereof, held on the 19th day of
September, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY TI::iOKNHTT,T.
SECRETARY
ATrACKMF_NT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF T~. CITY OF
TEMECULA, AHENDING T~. OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ~ CITY
FOR CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 26, CHANGING T1TE
ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE
MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THR SOLrrHW~TERLY CORNER OF
RANClIO CALIYORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK DE AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 91~0-005
~ C1TY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEM~CULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOIJOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before tile Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning dismet as
shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoaing Map
for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to
time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is mended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 26
and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
P,:~srA~u,'r~/,cz. Pc'z sn~ km 10
Se ,~~PPROVED, AND ADOPTED thi~
199__. ' ":
day of ,
RON ROBFATS
MAYOR
ATTF_3T:
hne S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEM]SCULA
I, Iune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199__, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOF~:
COUNCn~ME1VIBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
/UNE S. GREI~,K
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson
City Attorney
R:'~TAFFRF~6CZ.PC2 9110/9~ ~m 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
DRAFT ORDINANCE N0.94-__
A'rlACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF 'file CITY OF
TEME~, AMENDING TB'F, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF TIgE CITY
FOR CBANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO.
ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE
MINIM'tJM PARCF. I. SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON ~ SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
RANClIO CAI .n?ORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NU1VIBER 914-480-005
T1TF. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CAI.WORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of Ca|ifornla, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The ZOning district as
shown on the atlached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning Map
for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amencied hereafter from time to
time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described it. Change of Zone No. 26
and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto at.d incorporated herein.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adopt:on hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecuh shah certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public phces in the City.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVE. D, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,
199__.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
AT'I~.ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAI I~ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMIECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199__, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCrt
COUNCIIMEViBERS
JUN~ S.
CITY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson
City Anomey
R:~TAFFRFr~6CZ.PC2 9/i3/oA lab 11
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:'3TA~]~2 9/t3/94 kib 1~
City of Temecula
Pl3nnin Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name of Project:
2. Case Numbers:
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Change of Zone No. 26
Change of Zone No. 26
The southwesterly comer of Rancho Cal!fomia Road and Ridge Park
Drive
A request for the redesignation of a 21.4 acre parcel from R-A-20
CResidential Agricultural, 20 acre minimum parcel size) to C-O
(Commercial Office).
August 24, 1994
Drake Kennedy and Brian Kennedy
8820 Sunset Blvd., 2nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90069
(310) 65%8883
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in S~lion
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? __ __ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of ~he soil? X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief futures? X __ __
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? __ dX__ __
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? X
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? X __
Yes Maybe No
g. The modificasion of any wash, cbsnnel, creek, river or lake?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic h~,~rds such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Prioto Special Studies Zone?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?.
Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in abso~tion rates, drainage patterns, or the rate aad
mount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the mount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface wamrs, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including buI not limited te, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or mrbidi~?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the mount of water othenvise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
Yes Maybe No
_ _ x___
X
X
X
X
R:~TAF'F~I"I~(K:Z, PC2 9113/94. ~ 2
Yes Maybe No
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)? ~ ~
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants? __ __
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? __ __
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __ __
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species; or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land nnlmals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)? __ __
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threaxened, or
endangered species of animals? __ __
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __ __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of ~nimnlS? __ __
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wUdlife habitat? __ _
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? __X __
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? X
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? X __
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? __X _
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? __ __
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
I~L,er~PL-'2 9/13/94 klb 3
Yes Maybe N__o
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _X. _ _
f. Other governmental services: __ _X_ __
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy? _ _
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __ __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? _ __
b. Communications systems? __
c. Water systems? __ __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __ __
e. Storm water drainage systems? X __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __ _
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __ __
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __ __X
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant em ~sions? __
18. Aesthetics, Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __ .X.X
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
X
X
X
19.
20.
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area?
Retention. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities?
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
_ X
_ .X
R:'~STAFFRFI~6CT,.I~2 9tD/~. kl~ 6
1.g.
1.h.
1. i.
2.a,b.
Water
3.b.
No. The Change of Zone request and subsequent development c' the site will not result in
modifications to any wash, channel, creak, river or lake. None exist on the project site, nor are
proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately result in the exposure of people
and property to earthquake hazards, ultimate development of the site will expose people and
property to earthquake hazards. This is because the project is located in Southern California, an
area which is seismically active. Any potential impacts can be mitigated through building
consUction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. The project will not
expose people or property to geologic hazards such as landslides or mudslides. No known
landslides are located on the site, and the potential for exposure of people to landslides is low due
to the topography of the site and potential locations of building pad(s). The same is true for
mudslides. There is a potential for ground failure and liquefaction in this area. Any potential
impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building
Code standards and grading that is consistent with the pwvisions contained within Ordinance No.
457. The above information was obtained through the City 'of Temecula General Plan
Environmental Impact Report. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The Change of Zone request site is not located within an Alqulst-Priolo Special Studies Zone
as identified by the State of California, Resource Agency Depaxhuent of Conservation Special
Studies Zone Map. No significant impacts are anticipated as a resuh. of this project.
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in air emissions, in the deterioration
of ambient air quality and in the creation of objectionable odors; however, the Change of Zone
from Low-Density Residential to Commercial-Office will create situations whereby air emissions
may increase (during peak AM and PM traffic). Air emissions and objectionable odors will occur
during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not
considered significant. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use designation
for the site. Air Quality analysis in the General Plan's Environmental Impact Report shows no
significant impact to air quality at buildout. The analysis was conducted with the assumption that
land uses would be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations, No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in, nor snail any future development
of this site result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any change in
climate either locally or regionally.
No. The Change of Zone request will not result in, nor will ultimau; aevelopment of the site result
in changes to currents, to the course or direction of water movemev. ts in either marine or fresh
waters. The project site is not located adjacent to either marine or fresh water sources. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in changes to absorption rates,
drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff; however future development on the
site will result in changes when a project is realized. Previously permeable ground will be rendered
impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying bardscape and driveways. While absorption
3.c.
3.d.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
fauns and surface runoff will change, any impacts can be mitigated through sire design at the
development review stage. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequamly
handle any of the runoff which is creau~ by the realization of a projet: ~t this site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea.
Maybe. The Change of Zone proposal will not result in alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters; however, future development of the site may result in alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters. The project is not located within or adjacent to an identified floodway; however, it
is located within the Vail Lake Dam Inundation area. Emergency r~.')onse systems designed to be
implemented in the event of dam failure will be sufficient to mitigate any potential impacts to this
project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this pro~ect.
No. The Change of Zone proposal will not result in a change in the amount of surface water in
any waterbody. Ultimate development of the site will result in an incremental change in the amount
of surface water generated; however, these impacts are not foreseen as being significant.
Furthermore, no major waterbodies are located in the subjea projea area. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The Chsnge of Zone request will not immediamly result in any discharge inw surface waters
or in any alteration of surface water quality. However, future development of the site may result
in discharges into surface waters or in any alteration of surface wlner quality. Prior to issuance
of a grading permit for any development proposal, the developer will be required m comply with
the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge EJimination System CNPDES) permit from the
State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be pennilIed until an NPDES Notice of
Intent has been filed or the projea is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES
requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The Change of Zone request will not resuk in an alteration of fn, e direction or rate of flow of
groundwaters, nor will ultimate development of the site. Coastructicz on the site is not anticipated
to be at depths sufficient to have an impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone proposal nor any future development on the site will result in a
change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addkions, withdrawals, or through
interception of an aqulfer by cuts or excavations. Reference response 3.f. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this projea.
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in a reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies. Water service currently exists in proximity of the
project site. Typically, additional water service will be provided by Rancho C~ifurula Water
District (P, CWD) upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the propiny
owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request nor future development wil~ expose people or property
to water related hazards such as flooding due to the fact that the site is not located within the 100-
year flood plain as identified in the General Plan. No significant mipacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
Plant Life
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in a significant change w the diversity
of species, or number of any native species of plants, nor will any future development of the site.
No native species of plants have been identified on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
4.b.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request nor any future development on the site will result in a
reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plant. There
are no unique or rare plants on the site. In addition, threatened or enc-sangered species will not be
significantly affected (Reference response 4.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in the introduction of new species
to the site. Upon ultimate development on the site, new species of plants may be introduced as
required for landscaping purposes. No significant native vegetation has been identified on the site,
therefore, no significant impacts are expected from the introduction of these species.
4.d.
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in a reduction in the acreage of any
agricultural crop, nor will any future development on the site. No I:,rime farmland, farmland of
statewide or local importance, or unique farmland is located within the project site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Animal Life
5.a,b,
d,e.
No. The Change of Zone project site lies within the Riverside County Stephem' Kangaroo Rat
Habitat Conservation Plan Preliminary Study Area. During the planning phase of the project, a
specific site survey will be conducted to determine if the SK:P, presently inhabits the site. If the
Stephens Kangaroo Rat is identified on the project site, the project could contribute to an
incremental reduction of SICR habitat. Any impacts to the SKR would be mitigated by the Habitat
Conservation Plan mitigation fees as required by the City of Temecula. Since a Habitat
Conservation Plan has not been established as of this date, the impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo
Rat may be mitigated through the payment of the Interim Mitigation Fec pursuant to Ordinance No.
663. This fee will be imposed as a Condition of Approval for a project at this site. No other
sensitive species have been identified upon the site. However, the topography and vegetation
contained on the site are not conducive to the SKR species. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
5.c.
No. The Change of Zone request will not imm~,ctiately result in the introduction of any new
wildlife species into the area, nor will any subsequent development projects. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in increases to existing noise levels;
however, it may facilitate increases from the development of the site. Upon ultimate developmere
of the site, there will be resultant increases to existing noise levels. The land is currently vacant
and any development of the land would result in increases to noise levels during construction phases
as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. These impacts will not be considered
R:x~rAFFRFl'X26C~.PC'2 9113194
significant due w the fact that the potential fur noise impacts will be discussed at the development
review stage and mitigar~:l through site design (i.e. buffering, setbac!:s). No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.b.
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in the exposure of people to severe
noise levels. Ulti~ta development of the site may expose people to s~ong noise levels due to the
fact that the subject projea site is adjacent to a heavily travelted thoroughfare CRancho California
Road). Any potential impacts can be addressed at the developmew review stage and mitigated
through project design (i.e. walls, berms, landscaping and buffering;. In addition, developmere
of the site may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/consn'uction phase.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of thi~ project.
6.c.
Yes. The Change of Zone will not immediately result in the exposure of people to severe
vibrations. The project may expose people to severe vibrations during the development/construction
phase (short run). The exposure to severe vibrations will be of short duration and will not be
considered significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Light and Glare
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately produce or result in light or glare.
Ultimate development on the site will result in new light sources. All light and glare has the
potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. No impacts are foreseen from light and glare
since any future development on the site will be conditioned to be corsistent with Ordinance No.
655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No significant imp~r~-ae anticipated as a result of
this project.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. The site is currenfiy vacant. The Change of Zone request will f~cilitate changing the present
land use of the site. When a development project is realized on the si~e the use of the land will be
altered. The Change of Zone request will be consistent with the General Plan Land Use
designation for the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
No. The Change of Zone request will not result in an alteration to the future pined land use of
the site as described in the City's General Plan. The Change of Zone request to Commercial-Of'rice
is consistent with the Professional Office Land Use designation contained in the City's General
Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Natural Resources
9.a,b.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately result in an increase in the rate
of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource, ultimate development
of the site with Commercial-Office uses will result in an increase jn the rate of use of natural
resources (cousmlction materials, fuels for dally operation, asphalt, lumber) ~nd the subsequent
depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. No significant impacts are anticipau~i as a
result of this project because of the anticipated small scale of any proposed development.
R:~'T~PC2 9/13/94 Ir~ 11
rusk of Upset
lO.a,b.
No. The Change of Zone request will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions, since none are proposed in
the request. Upon ultimate development of the site, the risk of explosion or the releese of
hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions shall be relatively low based
upon pertained uses within the Commercial-Office zone. Any usas which may pose a greamr risk
will require a Conditional Use Permit, therefore, any potential hnVact can be addressed and
mitigated at the development review stage. The same explanations apply to the use, storage,
transport or disposal of any hazardous or wxic materials, No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
lO.c.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request nor subsequent development projects on the site will
interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The subject site is
not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. Any future development
will ultimately take access from a malntah~ed street and will therefore not impede any emergency
response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Ponulaflon
11.
Maybe. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in altering the location,
distribution, density or grovah rate of the human population of the area, however it may facilitate
it. Ultimate development of Commercial-Office uses on the site will generate jobs which in turn
may result in incremental alterations to the location, distribution,-dausity and growth of human
population in the area. Impacts are not seen as significant because sufficient infrastructure exists
in the area and because the emount of growth is a small increment of the total growth expeaed in
the area. No significant impaas are anticipated as a result of this project.
Homing
12.
Maybe. Reference response 11. An increase in population may result in an increased effect on
existing housing and has the potential to create a demand for additional housing. TheSe increases
will not pose a significant impact to the existing or future housing stock within the area because
existing housing swck and future housing stock will be sufficient to accommodate any increases in
population. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a,
No. The Change of Zone request will not immediately result in me generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement. The projea is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use
designation for the site. Traffic analysis in the General Plan's Environmental Impact Report shows
no significant impact to circulation at buildout in this area. The analysis was conducted with the
assumption that land uses would be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations. Upon
submittal of a development plan, the applicant will be required to submit a lever from a certified
Engineer stating that impacts from this project to adjacent intersections will be less than five
percent. A focused traffic analysis will be required for individual projects that have greater than
a five (5') percent impaa on affeaed intersections. Any impacts can be mitigated at this time. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRFr~6CT_PC2 91131oA lab 12
13.b.
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not immediately affect existir. g parking facilities, nor will
it immediately result in an increased demand for new parking. Upon ultimate development of the
site, there will be an increased demand for new parking which will be required for the project as
per City Ordinance. Off-site parking will be required and consistency with City Ordinances
regarding the amount of off-street parking required/provided will be reviewed during the
d~velopment review stage. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13 .c.
Maybe. The Change of Zone request will not create impa~qs upon existing transportation system,
including public transportation; however, ultimate development of the site, impacts may occur to
existing systems, including public transportation. Mitigation measures will be included at the
development project stage as required. Any impacts upon public transportation can be mitigated
a the design/developmem review stage of the project by adhering ~o recommendations from the
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.d.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immeaiately result in alterations to prasem
patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods; it may facilitate it. The site is
currently vacant and ultimate construction of Commercial 0ffic~ uses on the site will result in
alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of p~ople and/or goods. The alterations
will net be seen as significant because the alterations to present pat~ms of circulation/movement
of people and/or goods will serve the subject project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
13.e.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request nor any future development proposal(s) on the subject
site will result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists currently in the
proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts ~e anticipated as a result of
this project.
13.f.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately.:6:iult in an increase in traffic
hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians, ultimate development of the site will result in
an increase in traffic hazards to the above mentioned areas. Any impacts can be mitigated to a
level less than significant through site design which is consistent with City standards. Potential
conflicts can be mitigated at the development stage of the projecL No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Public Services
14.a,b.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately have a subsu~ntial effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered fire or police protection; ultimate development of the site with
Commercial-Office uses will provide impacts to these areas. Fire mitigation fees will be required
to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits for any d~veinpment project on the site. These
fees will offset any impacts which are created by the new development. There will also be a
resultant incremental increase in the need fur police protection because increases in commercial
development ultimately generates the need fur additional housing stock (reference response No. 12).
Any impacts to existing and future levels of service for police protenon can be mitigaIed through
the revenue generators which fund the City's police force (i.e. sales t2x, property tax, transient
occupancy tax, motor vehicle tax, etc.). These impacts are not seen as significant.
14.c.
Maybe. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately have a substantial effect upon
or result in a need for new or altered school facilities; ultimate d~velopment of the site with
Commercial Office uses may generate an incremental need for additional housing stock (reference
e:~rAFFm~n26c'~pc~ 9nss~ ~ 13
14.d.
14.e.
14.f.
Ener~/
15.a,b.
Utilities
16.a
response No. 12). 'Any rise in residential development gene~_~ the need for additional/expanded
school facilities. Any impacts can be reduced to a level less than significant through the payment
of school fees which will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building penrots for any
development on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea.
Maybe. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately have a substantial effect upon
or result in a need for new or altered parks or other recreational facilities; ultimate development
of the site with Commercial Office uses may, As mentioned in Response No. 12, commercial
development may result in an increase in demand for additional housing stock. Additional
residential units may result in a need for new/expanded park and/or recreational facilities. Quimby
fees are required to be paid prior to the recordation of a final map for residential units to finance
the creation/expansion of park and recreation facilities. Due to payment of these fees, plus the
limited scale of the project, any impacts will be incremental and ca~ be mitigated to a level less
than significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately have a substantial effect upon or
result in a need for ntaintenance of public facilities, including roads; future development of the site
will result in a need for the maintenance of the above mentioned facilities, Funding for
maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temeeula
from the State of California, Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a
result of the ultimate development of the site will be incremental. however, they will not be
considered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax is sufficient w cover any of the proposed
expenses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Maybe. The Change of Zone request will not immediately have a substantial affect upon or result
in a need for new or altered library services; however, future development on the site may have
an impact upon the above mentioned services. As has been previously discussed (reference
Response No. 12), additional commercial uses in an area may generate the need for addkinnal
housing stock. This in turn will result in an incremental increase 'in result in an incremental
increase in demand for library facilities. These impacts are not seen as significant and can be
mitigamd to a level less than significant through payment of library -fees. These fees are paid on
residential units prior w the issuance of building permits. No other governmental services will be
affected. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any future developmere on the site will result in the
use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy, nor will there be any subsequent increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. Increases
will occur as a result of ultimate construction of Commercial-Office uses on the site. These
increases will be limited because of the scale of the projea, and are therefore, not seen as
significant.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent development on the site will result
in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to power or natural gas. The project site is
within proximity of existing facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:~TAFFP, PT~2~PC2 9/13/94 klb ]4
16.b.
16,c.
16.d.
16.o.
16.f.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent development on the site will result
in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to commamica~.3n systems. No significant
impacts are ant'lcipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent development on the site will result
in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to water systems. Typically, water service is
available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent development on the site will result
in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer sysmms. According to the
City of Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), implementation of the General
Plan (of which this project is considered consistent with) any filmre project on the site would not
significantly impact wastewater services. No significant impact3 are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Yes. The Change of Zone request will not result in a need for new systems or substantial
alterations to storm water drainage systems (reference response No. 3.b,c.); however, any
subsequent development on the site will result in a need for new storm water drainage systems.
These w~l be required at the development review stage and the proje~-t will not be approved until
it is proven that the storm water drainage system is sufficient. No sigulficant impacE are
anticipated as a result of this project.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent deve~GDment on the site will result
in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any impacts
from solid waste created by tiltore development on the site can be mitigated through participation
in any Source Reduction and Recycling Progrnm~ which are imp,emented by the City. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16.g.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any subsequent development on the site will result
in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above.
There is existing development to the east and south of the project site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Human Health
17.a,b.
Maybe. As mentioned in response 10.a,b. the Change of Zone request will not result in a risk of
explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset
conditions, since none are proposed in the request. Upon ultimate development of the site, the risk
of explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions
shall be relatively low based upon pertained uses within the Commercial-Office zone. Any uses
which may pose a greater risk will require a Conditional Use Perink, therefore, any potential
impact can be addressed and mitigated at the development review stage. The same explanations
apply to the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or to:~ic materials. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:WI'~.pC2 9t13/oA. ~b 1~
Aesthetics
18.a,b,c.
Maybe. Reference No. ld. The Change of Zone request will not result in the obsumction of a
scenic vista or view open to the public. However, vistas and views open to the public exist at the
site. Future development related impacts to the sito would be mitigated through adherence to the
goals, policies and standards in the General Plan as it relates w hillside development. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
19.
Maybe. Although the Change of Zone request will not immediately have a substantial effect upon
or result in a need for new or altered parks or other recreational facilities; ultimate development
of the site with Commercial Office uses may. As mentioned in Response No. 12, commercial
development may result in an increase in demand fur additional housing swck. Additional
residential units may result in a need for new/expanded park and/or recreational facilities. Quimby
fees are required to be paid as part of development of residential units to finance the
creation/expansion of park and recreation facilities. Due w payment of these fees, plus the limited
scale of the project, any impacts will be incremental and can be mitigated to a level less than
significant. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
20.a.
Maybe. The Change of Zone request will not result in the alteration or destruction of any
paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeologieai or historic site. However, mis site is located within an
area identified by the General Plan as an area that may contain paieontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic sites. Future developmere of the site will be required m mitigate any
potential impam to palenntologic, prehistoric, archaeological or hiswric artifacts prior w the
issuance of any grading permits issued fur the site. Therefore, .io significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
20.b.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any future develorAnent on the site will result in
adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object. None
exist or are known to exist on the site (reference response No. 20.a.). No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this projea.
20.c.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any future development on the site will have the
potential m cause aphysicai change which would affect unique ethnic cultural vaiues. No "unique"
ethnic cultural values exist on-site or in proximit7 to the site (reference response No. 20.a.). No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
20.d.
No. Neither the Change of Zone request, nor any future development on the site will result in
res~ictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. None exist or are
known to exist on the site (reference response No. 20.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
R:~STAFFRFr~Z.K'2 911319~ k~ 16
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNiFiCANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self SusrMning
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or shims]
species, or eliminate important e~mples of the major
periods of California hiswry or prehiswry?
Yes M~Vbe No
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
ten, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short t=~m impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well inw the
future. )
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
X
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the poteniial to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
X
R:~STIPC2 ~/13/94 kJb 17
ENVIRONMENTAL D~--rI~fINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the artached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the projea will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed projea MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
~~--~"~{"~ Craig D. Ruiz
Signamre~,,,~ " ~,~ Name and Title
August 26, 1994
Date
R:~TAFFRFr~,6C'Z. PC2 9/13/94 Idb l~
ATFAcIia/IENT NO. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NO. - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 26
EXttmlT - A
PLANNING CO1VIIVHSSION DATE - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 26
Extrrnrr -D CHANGE OF ZONE EXtHRIT
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
CITY OF TEMECULA
CC
H L
SITE
EXI-ffRIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL O~'~'ICE
SI
~__ R-A-20
EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - R-A-20 {RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE 1VIINL-AUM PARCEL SIZE
CASE NO. - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 26
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - Si~T/~VI~ER 19, 1994
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - JUNE 6, 1994
R:~TAFFRFI~26CZ.CC 11~1/94 kl~ 9
STAFF REPORT o PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 6, 1994
Change of Zone No. 26
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- denying Change of Zone
No. 26 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained
in the Staff Report
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Drake Kennedy & Brian Kennedy
PROPOSAL:
Change of Zone Request for a 21.4 acre parcel from Residential
Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size to Manufacturing
Service Commercial and Open Space
LOCATION:
The southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ridge Park
Drive
EXISTING ZONING:
Residential Agricultural-20 acre minimum parcel size (R-A-20)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC)
Open Space (R-5)
Industrial Park(I-P)
County of Riverside
PROPOSED ZONING:
Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) & Open Space (R-5)
GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION:
Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
LightIndustrial
Vacant
Vacant
County of Riverside
R:~STAFFRPT~26CZ.PC 5131/94 Idb
BACKGROUND
The application for Change of Zone No. 26 was submitted to the Planning Department on
August 12, 1992. The applicants were informed that the project was inconsistent with the
City's Draft General Plan. Further, the applicants were informed that staff could not support
the project do to the inconsistency with the Draft General Plan. The applicants then requested
the processing of the application be suspended until the City adopted the General Ran. As
part of the General Plan process, the applicants requested and received a General Plan Land
Use Designation of Professional Office for the subject property. However, the new land use
designation did not rectify the General Plan inconsistency relative to the zone change.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal would change the property's zoning from R-A-20 to MS-C and R-5.
ANALYSIS
The proposed zoning designations are inconsistent with the City's General Plan. Planning staff
has had numerous correspondence, both written and verbal, with the applicants regarding the
General Plan inconsistency. Due to the inconsistency, staff provided the applicants with the
following options:
Modify the application to be consistent with the General Ran to enable staff to
continue processing the application.
Withdraw the application and be entitled to a partial refund of application fees. This
option would delay the immediate development on the site until such time as the City
adopts the official zoning map for the City. The adoption of the zoning map would
change the existing zoning to be consistent with the General Plan.
Proceed with the existing request. Staff would then forward the application to the
Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial without prejudice.
To date, the applicant has failed to respond to staffs' requests.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The site is currently zoned R-A-20. The General Plan Land Use Designation is Professional
Office.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA), CEQA does not apply
to projects which a public agency disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination
was prepared for this project.
R:%STAFFRFT~28CZ.PC 5131194 klb 2
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project is inconsistent with the City's General Plan, and the applicant has not responded
to staff's requests to either resolve the inconsistency issue or withdraw the application. The
application has been incomplete for approximately 22 months. Therefore, staff is
recommending the project be denied without prejudice.
FINDINGS
The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable requirements of state
law and local ordinances. The applicant has failed to submit all required information
in a timely manner in order for the project to be deemed complete in accordance with
State and local law.
The proposed zoning designations are inconsistent with the City's adopted General
Plan. Therefore, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the
General Plan.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 4
Exhibits - Blue Page 7
A, Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
R:\STAFFIt~T~26CZ.PC 5/31/94 kJb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-._
R:~STAFFRPT~6CZ.PC 5131194, Idb
A~ITACHIVIENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING CO1VINIISSION OF
TRV~ CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING CHANGE OF ZONE
NO. 26 TO CHANGE TWF, EXISTING ZONING OF
R~IDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL-20 ACRE MINIMU1VI
PARCEL Srz~. TO MANUFACTURING SERVICE
COMMERCIAL AND OPEN SPACE ON A 21.4 ACRE
PARCEL LOCATED ON ~ SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER
OF RANCHO C~LwORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK
DRIVE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCI~ NO. 940-
310-014
WltF~REAS, Brian Kennedy and Drake Kennedy fried Change of Zone No. 26 in
accordance with the City of Temeeula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WRRRY_AS, the Change of Zone application was not processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WI:I'I~.EAS, the planning Commission considered the Change of Zone on Juue 6, 1994,
at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an
oppormhity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WI~.REAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heaxd, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Change Of Zone No. 26;
NOW, TI~.RI~.YORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TWO. CITY OF
T'i"VIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETF_j1MINE AND ORDER AS FOIJI3WS:
Section 1. That the above recitations axe true and correct.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Change of
Zone, makes the following findings, to wit:
(1) The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable
requiremems of state law and local ordinances. The applicant has failed to submit all required
information in a timely manner in order for the project to be deemed complete in accordance
with State and local law.
(2) The proposed zoning designations are inconsistent with the City's adopted
General Plan. Therefore, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the
General Plan.
R:\STAFFRPT~26CZ.PC 5/3~/94 Idb 5
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency
disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for thi~ project.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1994.
STEVEN F. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I RI~I?,Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, h¢ld on the 6th day of June,
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSE~Vr:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONEKS:
GARY THOR_N~-~TrJ,
SECRETARY
R:\STAFFRPT~2eCZ.PC 5/31/94, kJb 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:%STAFFI~'%26CZ.PC 5/31/94 Idb 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
\
CASE NO. - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 26
EXHIBIT- A
P.C. DATE - JUNE 6, 1994
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT~26CZ.PC 5131/94, Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
h
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL-20 ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE (R-A-20)
M
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
CASE NO. - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 26
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 6, 1994.
R:\STAFFRPT%26CZ.PC 5/31/94
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTOR~;YPRO.~.~.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning '~'~
November 29, 1994
Main Street Program
Prepared By: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council provide direction to Staff on:
1. The needed amendments to the existing Bylaws;
2. The future organization of Main Street Association;
3. The use of alternate funding sources for the Main Street Program; and
4. The draft Cooperative Agreement between for the Old Town Mainstreet
(Merchants) Association and the City of Temecula.
BACKGROUND
At the July 12, 1994 meeting, the Council first considered the orga,~,zation of the future maih
street association for the Old Town area. At that meeting, the Council expressed a number
of concerns with using the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association to operate the Main
Street Program in Old Town. The Council's primary concerns were as follows:
· Ensuring that membership in the Association is Open to everyone;
· Ensuring that the composition of the future Board of Directors is as broad as
possible;
· Amending the Bylaws; and,
· Transitioning between the current and future Boards of Direc-ors,
As a result, the Council directed staff to have the City Attorney review the Bylaws of the
current merchants association, to bring a recommendation back to the Council about how to
change the Bylaws, to get copies of position descriptions and compensation packages for
other executive directors, and to develop an agreement to fund the main street program once
the details of the transition have been worked out.
Bylaw Amendments
The only significant concern the City Attorney had with the existing Bylaws was the lack of
an open meeting provision in Section 3.11, Based upon the City Attorneys review, staff
recommends the Council request the Old Town Mainstreet (Merchants) Association to mak~
the following amendments to their Bylaws as a procondition for receiving City funding for the
Main Street Program:
Amend Section 3.02 to change the requirements for being a member of the
Board of Directors from one year to 90 days (or some other period acceptable
to the Council).
Amend Section 3.11 to require that all meetings of the Board of Directors shall
be open to the public, except that confidential matters may be discussed by the
Board of Directors in closed session, and that meeting agendas be posted at
least 72 hours before the meeting in one or more places in Old Town and at
City Hall.
Amend Sections 6.01 and 6.02 to require that all general membership and
special meetings be open to the public and that meeting agendas be posted at
least 72 hours before the meeting in one or more places in Old Town and at
City Hall (to meet the requirements of the Brown Act).
The Transition to the Future Main Street Association
The transition from the current to the future Associations can be addressed by the City taking
the following steps:
e
Amending the current Bylaws to ensure maximum community involvement as
described above;
Entering into a Cooperative Agreement with the MainStreet (Merchants)
Association to state the responsibilities of each party, and to set up the working
relationship between the Association and the City; and,
· Retaining the current provisions for annual elections to the Board of Directors.
Cooperative Aareement
Based upon the Council's previous concerns, and the input of the City Attorney, staff has
developed a draft Cooperative Agreement to formalize the working and funding relationship
between the City of Temecula and the Association. The draft Agreement would commit the
City to spending $235,000on the Main Street Program over the next five years (as described
in the Old Town Specific Plan) and would commit the Association to amending their Bylaws
and implementing the Main Street Program. A copy of the draft Cooperative Agreement is
included in Attachment 1.
If the draft Cooperative Agreement is generally acceptable to the Council, staff will begin the
negotiation process with the Old Town Mainstreet Association. The final Cooperative
Agreement will be brought back to the Council at a later date.
ATTACHMENT 1
DRAFT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
C. To consider the establishment of alternative funding sources for the Main
Street Program if sufficient support of and opportunity for such a measure is present.
D. To assist the Association in the obtaining permits for major promotional
and fundraising activities in the Old Town area.
3. Duties and Responsibilities of the Association. The following are the duties and
responsibilities of the Association during the life of this Agreement:
A. To amend the Bylaws of the Association as rocommended by the City
Council to ensure maximum feasible community participation and organizational effectiveness.
B. To make no changes to the Bylaws or Articles o' Incorporation that coul0
affect the participation of interested persons in the Association or that could adversely affect
the continued economic redevelopment of Old Town without the prior approval of the City
Council.
C. To hire an Executive Director to implementthe Main Street Program, build
up the membership and public support for the Association, and to market and support the
businesses in Old Town.
D. To continuously explore, and attempt to acquire, alternate fundin~
sources to permanently support operation of the Main Street Program.
E. To provide a detailed Annual Report for each fiscal year on how the City
funding support for the Main Street Program was spent by May 1st of each year.
Street Program.
To promote and expand community interest and involvement in the Main
4. Indemnification. The Association agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold
the city and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees f:ee and harmless from al;
claims for damage to persons or property by reason of Association's acts or omissions of
those of Association's employees, officers, agents or invites in connection with their services
rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law.
5. Insurance. The Association shall secure from a good and responsible company
or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and
workers' compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City is named insured
or is named as an additional insured with the Association and shall furnish a Certificate of
Liability Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement by the City.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement
attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall:
A. Include the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees as
the insureds or names as additional insured covering the services to De performed under this
Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connections with, this Agreement.
B. Provide the following minimum limits:
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made in triplicate, this day of ,1994, by
and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, ("City") duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, and the OLD TOWN
TEMECULA MAINSTREET ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "Association" .) In consideration of their mutual covenants contained herein, the
Parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement is entered into with
respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct.
A. The City of Temecula and the Temecula Redevalopment Agency desires
to promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula; and,
B. The City of Temecula prepared and adopted s Specific Plan to create a
dynamic Old Town commercial and residential core that is attract,ve and of high quality,
respectful of its historic buildings and unifying design theme and providing an economicall'~.'
viable setting for a mixture of local and tourist serving commercial uses, administrative/
professional and residential uses with a safe, efficient circulation and access; and,
C. The Old Town Specific Plan recommended the establishment of a Main
Street Program to organize and unify the efforts of the Old Town's business community; and,
D. The Old Town Mainstreet Association is an established community
organization with an interest in improving and redeveloping Old Town Temecula; and,
E. The City and Association desire to implement a Main Street Program in
Old Town Temecula to encourage the revitalization of the area.
2. Duties and Resoonsibilities of the City. The following are the duties and
responsibilities of the City during the life of this Agreement:
A. To review the Bylaws of the Association and make recommended
changes to ensure maximum feasible community participation and organizational effectiveness.
B. To provide partial funding for the Main Street °rogram for at least five
years. The Old Town Specific Plan identified the following funding ?or each fiscal year:
by the City Council.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
Fiscal Year 1994-95 e75,000
Fiscal Year 1995-96 $60,000
Fiscal Year 1996-97 $40,000
Fiscal Year 1997-98 $30,000
Fiscal Year 1998-99 e30,000
Subsequent funding in future years will be determined annually
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 co,nbined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(2) Automobile Liability:
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
$1,000,000 combined single limit per
(3) Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers'
Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
C. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the city,
its officers, officials, agents and employees for losses arising from work performed by the
Association for the City.
D. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason
whatsoever, the city shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, not less that thirty (30) days before date of expiration or cancellation is effective.
E. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate
such deductible or self-insured retention as respects to the City, its Jfficers, officials, agents
and employees; or the Association shall procure a bond guaranteei~:g payment of losses and
related investigation claim administration and defense expenses.
6. Attornev's Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties
hereto concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall
be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be
entitled.
7. Termination. Either party may terminate this agreement on December 31 th and
June 30th of each year with 60-days advance notice, in writing, of their intent to do so.
8, Amendments. This Agreement may be amended in writing at any time with the
approval of both parties,
CITY OF TEMECULA
OLD TOWN MAINSTREET ASSOCIATION
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Frank Spencer, President
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
R:~'IOGAND~IAINST.CC3 11/21/94 dwh 8
ATTACHMENT 2
EXISTING BYLAWS FOR THE OLD TOWN MAINSTREET (MERCHANTS) ASSOCIATION
(c) Upon ,draission m ~ Association, .~ch new member shall be given
one (1) copy of ~be ByLaws. Each member is r~sponsible for k~--ping anti manraining th-ar
copy of the Association Bylaws.
Fees, Dues and Assessmems
Section 2.04. (a) All mereben shall pay annual dues in such amount ~s shall be
determined by molulion of the Board of ~rs.
Co) The first nnnual dues chill be payable when the application for
membenhip in the Association is made. Mereben of the Old Town Temecula Mer~hanu
Association become mereben of the Old Town Temecula Mnlnm~et A.ssocialion until the
renewal date for the Association member~h~, when they will join the Mnlnstr~t Association.
All ~nnnsl diles Shsll be prox-al~ on a quanniy basis to make all mcmbenhips cxpir~ on
January 1, 1996. No separam application fee shall be charged for making application to
membenhip in the Association.
(c) Futu~ annual dues ~ha!l be du~ and payabl~ on January 1st of each
of each suc, c.~ling y~ar.
(d) Any dues and s~e~me,nt~ paid to the Association become the property
of the Association and any severable or individual inn:rest of any member therein mrminates on
such payment.
Transferabilit~ of Membenhip
Sezlion 2.05. Memberhip in this Associalion is nonuansfa-able and nonassiSnable.
Membership Roster
Seelion 2.06. The Association shall keep a membership roster co.tni.l.g the .nine and
address of each member. The termi-.~ion of membenhip of any member shall be recorded in
the roster, together with the manner of termi.nrion and tinr~ on which such membenhip c~ased.
The membership roster sh~11 be k~pt at the Assocl.rion's principal offxce and shs|l be available
for inspeclion by any member of the Association during regular business houn.
Se~ion 2.07. All records of thk Association shall be open to inspection on the writran
dvnand of any member at any z~asonable time for a purpose reasonably related to his interests
in the Association.
Termination of Membership
Section 2.08. (a) The membership of any member of the Association shnn automatically
mrmina~e for any of the foliowing r~asons:
MAIN~'I'~IYLAW.F~/ 2 AsAmmsisab?~lss~ms~dDisssss~sl/l~s
BYLAWS OF TKE
OLD TOWN Th'WIECIKA MAINSTRn~T ~.SSOCIATION
AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION
ARTICLE I. OFFICES
Section 1.01. The principal offi~ of the Association for the transaction of its business
is locat~i at P.O. Box 1981, Temecula, in County of Rivehide, California, 92593.
Section 1.02. The Board of Dix~'ton my by msolmion de,siEn~r~ other offices, within
or without the State of Califonfia wher~ it is qualified to do business, as ks business may
1'equh'~. However, the Board ~h~11 illcur no f~n~nt'~ia], li~hility OD behalf Of the Association in
obtaining other offices without the prior at~ of a majority of the voting members of the
Association.
Classes of Membership and Rights
Section 2.01. The Association .~h~n have one (1) class of membership. The
membenhip, voting, and other rights, inmr~sts and privileges of each member shall be equal.
Each membership shall be allowed only one (1) vote in each election.
Quali~eotions for Members
Seaion 2.02. (a) The q,,~Hfi~Hons for membership ax~ as follows: any r~putable penon
(at least eighteen (18) years of age), business, association, corporazion, partnership or estate,
interested in the continued economic health and cultural vitality of Old Town, shall be eli~ble
for membership.
Admission
Section 2.03. (a) Any qualified penon sh~ll be admitted W membership upon m.ldn~
application thmrw and upon the appzoval of the application by a majority of the Boani of
Directors or their designee. The application shall be on such forms and in the ~n~nne~
prescribed by the Board of Direcwrs.
(b) All applit~rions for admission W the Association shall contain an
acknowledgem~t that the applicant has ~ the Articles, Bylaws and other appmpri~r~ roles
and standards of the Association and that ff admiued to membership, agr~s to be bound thereby.
(i) On his wrlw~ mluest for .st:tch r~-mir,~fion delivered w the
President or Secretary of the Association penonally or by United States mail, such memberstrip
w lcrminnte when the request is xcccivcd; or,
(ii) When any member who fails to pay the membership dues or
assessments when they become due and within forty five (45) days thereabet shall automatically
terminated on tl2 forty sixth (46) day, provided he was given wrincn notice dellvercd w him
personaliy or by United Slates mmil within ten (10) days prior to the date said dues or
asse~ments were due. In the even~ that such wriffen notice is not given as heroin rcquL, cd, then
said membership shall auWm~rlc-lly r~minate for nonpayment of dues or assessmen5 only i.f
they al~ not frilly paid within ~ (30) days afler such wrincn notice is cvcnv. mlly given and
delivc~i to the member in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prrpaid and
sent to the adch~ss as it appears on the books of the Association.
Co) All rights and intexcst of membenhip in the Association shall cease
upon the termln~rlon of or expulsion from membership in the Association as heroin provided.
(c) Any member whose membenhip is terminated as provided for in rim
Section, may be readmiued to membenhip by meeting the applicable membcnbip zcqui.rcments
for new mereben.
Discipline of Members
Seaion 2.09. (a) Whenever a member of the Assocls,lon f~il~ w abide with the Articles,
Bylaws or Rules of the Associ~,ion, the Board of Dix~ctors may discipline the member for their
actions, behavior, or other good cause. Good cause shall mean the following:
(i) Any conduct or behavio~ that brinffs the Association into public
disrepute or violaxes the purposes for winch this Association is formed;
(ii) Any willful failure or xcfusal to abide by the Articles, Byhws,
or Rules of thi~ Association;
(iii) Any willful failure or xcf~,~l to abkic by the terms of an
award in any arbiu'aton proceeding under tbe terms of this Amcle afar having agn~d in writrig
to do so and a_her having xP. ceived notice of the award; or,
(iv) Any willful failure or refusal w pay any assessment levied
pursuant to the provisions of this Article.
Co) The Boant of ~rs is hereby authorized, as hcx~in pmvicicd w
impose any of the following penalties:
(i) Suspend the member fxom membership in the Association for
a period not more rh=n one (1) year; or,
Initial Board of Directors .
Section 3.04. The Initial Board of Dixeaors for the Assoclarlon ~hall consist of the six
(6) members of the Old Town Iqler, jaants Associalion Board of Directors. Tin~ (3) of these
Dixeaors shatl have two year terms of office ending in April 1996, and thx~ C3) shall hav~ a
one year term of office ending in April 1995. The one and two year tams of office sha/1 be
den:rmlned by drawing lots.
Additional Interim Dir~___er
Section 3.05. The htirlal Boaxd of ~ may appoint one additional DL,~ctor to serve
a one year man of office, ending in April 1995. Any directon appointed under thi~ section
must be elected by a 2/3rds vote of the entixe Board of Dixectors. The additional Director shall
have the ~me pzivfleges and responsibilities as any duly elected Di_~'xor of the Association.
Election of Dir'eaors
Section 3.06. The election of the Boani of Direnots shall be done in the followrag
Inanne'E
(a) During the month of January tn~:eding any election, the Seertory
Shah send a notice to all members stating that nominations for th~ elected Board of Directors
may be submined to the Secretary of the Association during the month of February and the
President shall appoint a ~ (3) member NOmina'r;ng COWmi~'s~ to select qnaJ,Lfied c:alldidat~
for the Board of Directors. Nominarlons ~ha~ be open for a period of at leas~ thirty (30) days.
Co) A ballot conmlnlng the list of can.dida~, and providing an oppormnit~
for write in candidates, shall be di.m'ibuted by certified m,;1 or other vexifiable m~-, not less
than fourteen (14) days before to the ~ of the ~cheduled election.
(c) Any member my vote by absentee ballot provided that the ballot is
received by the Association no lat~x' than 5;00 p.m. the day before the scheduled election.
Voting by proxy or cumulative voting (casting mt~tiple votes for a single candidate) is not
allowed.
(d) All elected Dix~-~on, other than those named in the Articles of
Association, Shall be eleaed by the members present and voting at the fi_v~t Regular Meeting
held in April of each year, pwvided that a quorum is present. If no quorum is proeat, the shall
be held at the next Reg. lar or Special lvie~g at which a quonnn is present. The candida~s
receiving the highes~ v,,mber Of vOleS are ~.
(e) If d,,ring the Imr..ess of anuually electing rime membeu w the Boar~i
of DL,'~ors there is a tie for the is1 ~ posi~on, t~ .hall be an bnmediat~ urnoff
election w determine who shall serve on the Board. In the runoff election, any member of the
Association in atmndance at the meeting may vote by secret ballot.
gS'~BYLAW.FIN 6 As ~%ms~ by ~ l~ ~ 3/11t~
(vi) The heaving aff~inq any member shall be informal and the
rules of evidence and rules of judicial procedur~ need not be observext. Th: burin~ shall be
presided over by the President of the Association who stall (1) read the ctmrges agains~ the
subjea member, (2) requi~ that the chalV,.s be verified by the tesrlmony of th~ p~rson or
penons mnlcing the~; (3) hear any other witnesses against the subj~a manEr, (4) allow
subjea member w cross-enmine ,~eh wimess; (5) allow tie subjea member w nmk~ a
statement of his own behalf; (6) allow the member to ~' wimesses in his own behatf; (7) allow
the Dizl~-~ors present, wben and as ztcogni~ed by the Chnlr, and sllbjea to collllol of the chair,
w quesdon wimesses; and (8) rule on the nrtmkSiOn and exclusion of evidenc= and on questions
of hearing pmc~iur=.
(vii) After beari~ all relevant testixnony and evidence, the
DL~ctors who s.~ pxesent at the hea~g .~hall vote on wl~'ther or not sufficient evidence has
been presented to der~ine wh~ther the subject member ha~ failed w act in a mnnner consisteIlt
with the ~ and ethics of the Association. The vo~e imposing disciplin~ or dismissing the
matter shnll in either event be
(viii) If the Bosrd of ~ has demrmine~l that the subject
member has violarod ~e g~ nd ~ of ~ ~on, ~ ~n sh~ll d~e w~t
~ ~ push ~e ~bj~ m~ ~ ~y m~nn~r it ~s ~, ~ns~t ~ ~
~xuv~io~ d thi~ S~.
ARTICLRm- DIRECTORS
N-tuber of Direaors
Section 3.01. Th~x~ shall be seven (7) ~ ior the Association. These Bylaws may
be mended w allow additional mereben on the Bo~ of Dire'ton. Any amendmere of thes~
Bylaws to allow additional mereben w the Board of Di.n~rs shall mquir~ a two-thirds C/13's)
vote of the Bo~i.
Qualifications of D'_wect__ers
Seaion 3.02. A ~ of the Association must curr~n~y be, and have been, a member
of the Association for at least one year prior to assuming the office of Dh-~-tor.
Terms of Offies for Directors
Section 3.03. The Term of Offi~ for any Dh~aor of the A~sociafion is ~wo ('2) y~an,
except that the Term of Office for some Inkial Dir~n may be for a one yesr period. Any-
Director elected by the membenhip shnll be ellgibl~ for x~tection up to two (2) consecutive two
year terms, providext they continue w meet the q,,n.fications for office.
MAIN,Vr~YLAW.Fffq 5 AsAm~adsdbytl~i~ss~ofl;)~s~ss3tllR4
(c) Vacancies caused by the fiesta; xt~i~xion, or disability of any
I)ix~r, or rexnoval as pwvided in these Bylaws, or by an amcnchncnt of the Bylaws increasing
the number of Dhr. ctors authorized shall be filled by a vote of the majority of the remnlnl.g
Discton, thouEh less than a quorum, or by a sole mnaining Dix~'tor. A vote of the majority
of the members of the Association may elea a Dixector at any dine w fill any vacancy not filJed
by the Direcwrs as pwvided in ParaEt-aph (c) of thi~ Section. Should the of-~ces of all Direaor~
become vacant and there is consequently no Direaor left w fill vacancies, the vacancies shall
be filled by a vote of the major~ of the membc~ ~ at a re~,,t~ar or special meeting of
members called for th~ purpose.
(d) Persons elected to fill vac~llcies 2.s ill thi~ sectioD provided sh~11 hold
office for the uncxpired ms of their predecesson, or nndl their r~noval or wriu=n resi~a,~on
as provided in theso Bylaws.
M,,~,,~ of the Board of D'_h-ed_n_rs
Section 3.11. (a) M__,__~fjngs ~h.ll be held at the princi~ office of the Association unless
otherwise p~vided by the Boax~L
Co) The Board of ~ ~h.n meet at least once a month at such dine
and place as may be dasip~ by resolution of the Board of Direaors.
(c) Spechl mecdngs of thc Board may be ~]hd by the l~,.sident, or, if
he is absent, is --=hle, or refuses W act, by the Firs~ Vice President, or, if he is absent, is
unable, or refuses w act, by the Second Vice President, or by any four (4) ~, and such
mccdngs Shn!l be beld at the place desigx~ by the pex'son or persons t~lllng the me~dng and,
in the absence of such designation, at the principal offxcc .of the Associa~on. · .--'
:- ' (d) Writ~n notice of the ~imc and pl~ of meetings shall bc~deliv~''-
personally to each Direaor or sent to him by United S,~m mail, postage prepaid, 'or 'by'
telephone, at least four (4) days prior to such meeting.' If sent by m~,'l. the notice sh~, be '~
addressed to the Di~ctor at his ~d~r~ss as shown on the books of the AssoH.~rm and ~h~, be
chromed given at the time it is deposited in the mail.
(e) The wartsactions of any meetings of the Board, however called and
noticed, arc as v-Aid as though the meeting bad been duly held after proper c311 and notice, and
]~l'Dvidzd th2Z 2 quoBllll as ~ delculed, is plW,,$C~ or 131'Ovided th,t either before or ~ '
the meeting -~eh ]:~reaor not present signs a waiver of notice, and consents to the ho~dleg of
the meeting. All such waivers, consents, or aIxplDvais ~hnll be filed with the Associadons's
records or mad~ a part of the ,~h~es of the meed~.
(f) A~ least half of the all ~ mh.n con-fiLm a quonun for the
t~n~don of Assoc~zion businc,~.
Section 3.07. The duties of the Dizecton of the Assochtion s. re a~ follows:
(a) To perform any and all duties imposed on them colleaivcly or
individ,,.ny by law, by the Charier or Bylaws of this Association.
(b) To employ such officers, agents, and employees as may bc authorized
by the vote or wrkten consera of a majority of the mereben of the Assucladon.
(c) To supervise all of~cen, agents, and employees of this Associmon
to cnsuze that their duties are being pwperly performed.
(d) To register their adth~ with the Secr~ of the Association, and
w receive notices of meetings m~{l~i or telegsaphecl to them at the adch~ss on f~c with the
Associadon.
(c) To change the principal off~ of the Assoc4~rion f~m one loation
Compensation of Directors
Seaion 3.08. Dizecr~.shall serve wi~out compensation.
]!~mqval of Direaors
S~ction 3.09. Any DL-ec~, my be removed fzom office at any time by the vote of a
majority of the Membership of the Associnrlon. If any or all Direaors ar~ so removed, new
Dix~aors may be elected at the ~rne mceting and shall hold offxcc for the remainder of the
terms of the removed Director. If new Direaon axe not elected at such me~ing, the wc~ncy
or vacancies c~-=~,'d shall be filled as provided in Se~lon 3.10.
Vacancies
Section 3.10. (a) Vacancies w the Boasd of Direcwn, shall ex~: (1) on the d.~rh,
x~signation, or removal of any Direcwr, (2) whenever the number of Directors authorized by
the Bylaws is inau~; and (3) on failure of the members young in any election w elca the full
number of ~n authozized.
Co) TheBoazdof~rsmaydechrevacan~thcof~ceofa~
for any of the following reasons: (1) the subject Direaor has been declared of mound mind-
by an order of court, (2) the subject Dixector is convicted of a mi~dPme~nor rciaring to the
duties or activities of the Assoclnrion, C3) the subject Director is convicted of a felony, or (4)
if within sixty (60) days the notice of election the subject Director does not accept the office
cithcr in writing or by attending a meeting of the Board of Dhzaon.
waAn~-nnYt. Aw. Fn~ 7
Co) All additional ~ listed in SectiOn 4.01 shall be appointed by and
serve at the picasure of the Board of Dimctor~ and need not be members of the Board of
D~caon.
Terms of Office
Section 4.04. All Offwen of the Asso~mH~n ~hall serve for a one (1) year pc~xt from
the tune they am ~ un~l ~hc nc~ ~n,~al ele~on.
Duties of Officers
Section 4.05. (a) President. The Pmsidem shall preside over all meetings of the
Association and the Board of Dimaors, and shall appoint the mereben of the Committees
identified in Section 05.01 of these Bylaws. In addition, the President my appoint a Sc~cant
at Arms at any time during a meeting when k is necessary w maintaiu order.
Co ) First Vice Presidere. The Fire Vice President shall preside over the
meetings of the Association and the Board of Directon, and perform the other duties of
Prcsidem in the absence of the Pmsidmm The Fnst Vice Pmsidem is also responsible for
overseeing mcmbc~h~ activities and functions.
(c) Second Vice Pmident. The Second Vice Pmsinent sh~u preside over
the m~ings of the Association and the Board of Directors, and perform the other duties of
President in the absence of the President and the Fint Vice Px~ident. The Second Vice
President is also responsible for oveneeing specizl and promotional events.
(d) Tmasu~r. The Tmasur= ~han .have charge of all receitms and monies
of the Asso6ar~on, d~posit them in the name of the As,~afion in a bmnk apptoved by the
Board, and disbune funds as ordered or anthotized by the Board. The Treasurer shall keep
accurate account and collect all application feea, du~, and cbs_.-ges due flora mereben, and keep
regular accounts of his receipts and disbuncments, submit his record when iv. quested, and ~ve
an itemized statement at regular meetings of the AssociAtion. In the absence of thc President,
Fint Vice l~sidcnt and Second Vice Presidere, the Treasurer shall prcsicic and assume the
duties of the President.
(C) Secr~taxy. The SectoralV sbaJl ke~p the minutes of all meetings of the
Association and the Board and x~d such minutes at the beginning of each meeting, if requested
to do so. The Secretary shall also mail out the Notices of Meeting for the Association and
Board. With the consent of the Boaxd of ~, the Secr~xry my delcgat~ thcac additional
rcsponsibilkies to an approFziate employee of the Associmion. In the absence of the President,
Fint Vice President, Second Vice President, and Treasurer, the Seczm2ry shall assume the dudes
of the President.
Compemsation of Officers
Seaion 4.06. Of-ricers shall serve without compensation.
(~) In the absenee of a quorum, no bushess. shall be transacted. anci the
only motion which the chair shall entertain is a motion to adjourn, provided, however, that a
majority of the Direaors present at such meeting may adjourn until the time fixed for the next
regular meeting of the Boani.
(h) Meetings of Direaon shall be presided over by the l~sident of the
Associmion, or in his absence, by the Fin~ Vice President or, in his absence, by the S~cond
Vice President or, in their absence, the T~asurer of the Associalion, or in his absence. any
Direaor chosen by a majority of the Directors pP,.sent.
(i) Meetings of Dix~'tors shall be governed by Robert' s Rules of Order,
as such rules my be x~sed, insolaf as such roles a$c not inconsistent or in conflict with these
Bylaws, with the Ardeles of thh Association, or ~ State law.
0) Every m or decision done or made by a majorit~ of the Direaors
present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is p~sent is the act of the Board of DLreaors,
and hence of the Association, unless the Azticles or these Bylaws ~luire a ~r~ar~r number.
Number and Tries
Section 4.01. (a) The .Officers of the Association shall he a l~siclent, Fire Vice
President, Second Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer.
(b) The Association may aho have, at the discretion of the Board of
Direaors, a S~t at Arms, one or more Assistant. Secrem-ies, one or more Assistant
Trusurers, and such other supplemental offic~--n as the Boa~i of Direaors may deem necessary.
A Sergeant at Arms may be used w l~=sln!v=in 01~ at ally m~l~xlg. The duties and
responsibilities of these supplemenlxl o~ shall be determined by the Boaxd of ~.
Qualifications
Seelion 4.02. Any member of the Board of Directors of thig Association is q,,ali~ied t0
be an Officer of the Association as defined in Section 4.04.
Election of Officers
Seaion 4.03. (a) The l~sident, the Fix~ Vice I~sident, Second Vice Pl~sident,
Sea~ary, and Treasurer shall be elec~ by the Directors fwm amon~ their number at their fir~
mee~ng following their election, or, in the case of the Direc'wrs named in the Axticl~s, at their
first meeting following formation of the Association. Such officen, including the original
officers, shall be eligible for reelection without limitation on the number of tens, provided they
continue to meet the cl-alifications for office.
MAII~'~BYLAW,I~I 9 As A~asssad by m~ Boas~t d Dmnss~s 311w9~
S~ion 5.0~. No member of the Association shall be allowed to serve as a voting
member of any Comminee so long as their du~s ar~ delinquent. Non-members of the
Association may assist and work on any Commitme of the AssOL'i~rlon as non-voWtg membcn
or advisors.
Section 5.05. Persons zppoimed in chat~ of commin~.._~ ~haU be recognized by the dtl~
of "Ch~i.rperson".
ARTICLE VL lVn~TINGS OF lVIEM~ERS
Regular
Section 6.01. (a) l~g~,hr and Special M~tings .~h.11 be held at the principal office of
the Association or otlzr place as my be designated by th~ Board of Dimcton.
(b) T'n~rlme ofcach RegniarMeeting ofthc Assocl.r~on shall beat alimc
set by the Boanl olin. The rosalag of individual Notices of lvlccting is not required for
x~gularly schcduled meetings. Except in the cvczn of a declamt mnergncy, the Board of
Dir~ton for th~ Association for that year, shall be ehscu~ at the mg,,lsr meeting held in April
of each year beLZinnlng in 1995.
(c) AI any 1L--gular Meeting, no action .~hnu be tak=n on any of the
following proposals unless a wrinen notice of the m~dng has beea given to each member. (1)
a proposal to sen, lease, convey, ~xehange, transfer, or othmvise dispose of all or substa~tl,ny
all of the property or asses of the Association; C2) any proposal relating ~ the n~l property of
the Association; (3) any proposal to incorporate; (4) any proposal to amemd the Articles of thi~
Association; or (5) any proposal to ctLssolve th~ Association.
Smchd
Se~don 6.02. (a) All Sp~:ial meetings of m~m~,rs shah be called by the Prnident, or
ny four (4) ~n of ~e ~ion, ~ by not lss ~ ~-~ve ~nnt ~5 ~) of ~e
Mem~n of ~e ~s~.
(b) When mtuimt by these Bylaws or the Boazzt of Dinn~n, vainn
notice of the time and place of meetings shall be delivered pm'sornlly to each m~nber, or sent
to him by United States mail, postag~ prepaid, or by tel~phon~, at leag seven C/) days prior to
the meeting. If s/at by mnil, the noti~ shall be addl~sed to the menlb~ at the addl'~s as
shown on the books of the Association and shall be d~xned given at the time it is cL--posimd in
the mail.
(C) The Notice of Meetillg nh~ll, at a minimum contain, tile following
information: the location, day and time of the meeting, th~ topics to be discussed, and the
of the c~cision to be made or of the business to be Innsacted. A copy of the Ag~nda for the
meeting may be sub~mr=d for the Notice of lvle~ing ff all the mtuimt infomatioo is provid=d.
~n,~nmn.~w.~ 12 As ~sssSsS ~ m~ ~sS ef Disstun s/lg~9~
Removal or Officers
Section 4.07. Any or all officers may be x-anoved from office at any time by the vote
of a majority of the ~rs of the Association. In the case of the r~moval of any officer, a
new offi~r Shall be ~ected to serve the unexpLv~d pollion of the r~rlI1 of his predecessor at the
meeting at which the offic~ is removed.
Vacancies
Section 4.08. (a) Vacancies in the ice of l~sident, Fiat Vice President, Second Vice
President, Secretary, or Treasurer shall exist on the death, resi~a~on, or removal of such
officer or on the failure of the direcwrs in any election w fill the office.
Co) The Board of Directon my declax~ wt~nt any offme for any of the
following reasons: (1) if the o~rzcer is declared of un~ound mind by an order of court, (2) the
officer is convicted of a mlt-J.ne~.or x~i=fing to the duties or activities of the Association, (3)
the officer is convicted of a felony, or (4) if within siny (60) days after thc notice of election
the officcr does not acc~ the dficc cither in wrinng or by auending a mccfing of the
(c) Vacancies ,h~n be filled by the Boaxd of ~ at the next regular
meeting at which a quorum is present following the vacancy.
(d) Oftcen elected to fill vacancies, as pwvided in rhi~ section, shall hold
office for the uncxpix=i terms of their predecemn, or until their removal or mignation as
provided for in these Bylaws.
S~ion 4.09. The President, Firsz Vice l~sident, ~econd Vice President, Secretary and
the Treasur=r, Shall constitute an Executive CommilT.=e to assist the Board in conduction routine
business of the Association.
ARTICLE V. COM1KITrk~-~
Seaion 5.01. Thc Board of Directors shall anthe and define the powen and duties
of all Committees. All Cornmirr~_~ ShM1 Serve aE the pleasure of the Board. No Commitlee
shall adopt theiz own bylaws or mainmln their own fUllCh in separate accotlns.
Section 5.02. The President, with the approval of the Boai'd of Directors, shall al3point
all Committee Chailpersons.
Section 5.03. All Commit~ Chahpenons shall be members of the Association and shall -
agree in writing, w abide with all atxpropriate rules and zeg,,la~ons of the Association. The
Ch.irperSOn slnll appoint or select the members of thor Committ~ and Sh.ll provide tim Board
of Dirmors with a complete list of the membenhip of the Comma.
Ch~.ks and Notes
Section ?.02. Except as otherwise specifically determined by resolution of the Boaxd of
Directon, pwvided for in Section ?.01, by the Articles of this Association, or as otherwise
~quired by hw, all chech, drafts, promissory notes, ordm for the payment of money, and
other evidences of indebtedness of this Association shall be si~ed by the Tr~gir~r, or Assist~m
Treasurer, and countenigned by another officer of the Associa~on.
Section 7.03. All funds of the Associ~finn shall be d~osimd w the credit of the
Association in such banla, u'ust cornpanic, or other deposim-ies as the Board of ~rs may
ARTICLe- VIE ARBITRATION OF CONTROVERSIES
Seaion 8.01. (a) Any comroversy hotwean mereben involving theix membership or
fights shall, on the wriuen ~luest of either member thereto, filed with the Pmsideut or
Secretary of the Association, be submiffed to arbitration, nnd Such arbitration shall, excc?t as
otherwise heroin provided, comply wifla Sections 1281 fin~ugh 1288.1 of the California Civil
Code of Procedure.
Co) Bach ']~t~y m the contwver~y shall seiea one (1) Member of the
Association as an arbiu-aror and the two arbitmto~ so selected ~h~ll seiect a thh'd arbitrator from
among the Board of Dix~cwrs, and the third arbitr'~or ~h~ll be the ~ arbitrator.
(c) The neutral afoiwator Sh~11 appoint a time and place for the h~tring
and cause notice thereof to be served person=ny or by r~Zistered or c~tified mail on the parties
to the arbiwation and the other afoitrawrs not less tbgn SeVeu (7) deyS bd01~ the h~rillg,
pwvided, however, that zppear-an~ at the he~ing waives the right to notice.
(d) The nmm~l arbitrator my adjourn or continue the hearing as
necessary. On request of a party to the arbitmion for good can,~, or on his own demnnination,
the neuwal arbitrator may postpone the hearing to a time not l~mr than the dat~ fixed by the
agr~mcnt for W~k4ng the ward, or to a lamr date if the parties to the arbitration consent thereto.
(e) The Neutral arbitrator ~h~]l preside at the hearing, shall rule on the
admission and excrusion of evidence and on questions of hearing procedure and shall ex~cise
all powen relating W the conduct of the hearing.
(f) The parties w the a~intion m entitled w be hear, w present
evidence and to cross-examine witnesses appesmg at the hearing, but rules of eviclence and
rules of judicial procedure need not be observed.
Conduct of Mp~t_lw_w~
Section 6.03. (a) Me~ings of members shall be l~.sided over by the P~sident of the
Association or, in his absence, by the Fire Vice President, or, in absence of both, the -~ocond
Vice PiThtent, of in the absence of the Plaideat and Vice Pmiident$, any other ~r of
the Asioci.tion piesent at the meeting, or if no di~aors or officers are present, by a clnah-man
chosen by a majority of the ramben pitsent.
(b) The Secrem'y of the Association shall act as Socr~uh-'y of all meetings
of members, provided I.h.t i11 his ab.%,.-'llc~ th~ presiding officer shall atopolin another person w
act as Secreu~ of the meeting.
(c) Meetings stall be governed by Rebert's Pixies of Order, as such rules
may be x~vised, insofar as such rules n~ not inconsistent with or in conflict with these Bylaws,
with the A,r~cles of the Association or ~ Sta~ law.
QuorlBll
Section 6.04. The presence of fifteen percent (15 ~) of the Members of the Association
shall constimm a quorum to call to order or tnnnct business at any Regular or noticed Speeizl
Meeting. In the absence of a quorum, no business shall be tnnsamd and the only toolion winch
the chair Shall entertain is a motion to adjourn. If after the official op~ning of any m~ing, the
quorum is lost, the mereben px~nt may continue w wansact business until adjournment, if any
actions taken (other than adjournmere) are approved by at le~ a majority of the members of
the Association ~quix~i to constitute a quorum.
Section 6.05. Voting Sh~ll be by voice vom, except ti~ the election of ~rs shall
be by. s~cmt ballot. Memberi shall not be permilled W vot~ or act by pwxy, or comulafive]y
vote.
ARTIO',~- ~ EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS, DEPOSrfS, AND FUNDS
Execution of Instruments
Section 7.01. The Board of ~rs, exert as otherwise expressly provided in the
Articles of Assoclalion or these Bylaws, may by x~solution anthoriz~ any officer or afteat of the
Association to cnmr into any contract and deliver any iusmunenu m the name of alld on behalf
of the Assuciation, and such authori~ may be ~xeral or confined to specific instances,
provided, however, tim such conwatt or delivery is expx~ly anthorned in the Chair, Bylaws, -
and/or approved by the vom or wrilmn consent of a majority of the members of the A. ss~x'~.fion.
The President, and the S~ or Tx~asurer shall, upon being direaed by the Board of
DLr~tors or the m~mbership, sign all leases, contacts, or other instruments in wridng of the
Association.
MA~'r~Y1-AW-!=~/ I3 ~ { ~ ~ ios~mt or~ 311~
(c) The ft.cal y~ar for the A.tsoei~fion i April 1 throu,*h March
Section 10.02. The Boaxd of ~ my adopt, use, alto, or mnc~l an Association
insignia or seal, or both, and by rule slmll tnt~zibe the time, man,~er, and place in which s,,eh
insignia may be worn or used.
ARTICLE X'L CONSTRUCTION
Section 11.01. As used in these Byhws:
(a) The pr~___-cAt tense includes the past and fi,nm~ tenses, and the futur~
tense includes the present.
Co) The m gender inalude, fe,-inl-e and neuter.
(c) The singular nmnbex inchd~ the plural, and the plural number
inchlde~ the ~llg~fl=r.
(d) ~ WORI ",~h~lT" i8 m:~nrl=rrlry nnd the wold
(e) The wonts "DinR:tors" and *Board" as used in these bylaws in
to any power or duty xequixing collective action, mean 'Beani of Directors".
(f) The word "Article' as used in these byhws means the Articles
Incorporation or charter for the
ADOPTION
We, the undersigned, axe all of the persons n=med as ftm Directm~ in the Ch=rter of ,big
Asaociation, and hereby mend and adopt the =rmeh~-! Byhws of said Association.
Dir=tor
Dirmor
(g) The awald _~hs~ be in writing and signat by the attfilrators concurring
therein. It shall include a determimtion of all the questions to the arbitraton the decision of
which is necessary in order w deternine the controversy.
Cn) The neuwal arbkrawr shall serve a signed copy of the award on each
party to the srbin~on personally or by regis~ted or certified mail.
(i) The.award shall be made within thhty ('30) days after the conclusion
of the heating, provided, however, tha the objection that the awani was not timely made is
waived unless the party objecting g~ves the arbiwawrs wrimm notice of thi~ objeaion prior w
the sawice of a siglled copy of the award on him
0) The manner of concoring and enfonfing the award shall be p~scribed
in Sections 128~ and 1285 through 1288.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
ARTICLE IX. BYLAWS
Adeption, Anaendrn,nt~ and Repeal
Seaion 9.01. These Bylaws shall become effective on their being si~ned by the original
Direaors of the Association, or on ~ adoFdon by the vote or wriuen consent of a majority
of the members of thi~ Associa~on. These Bylaws my be mended or r~ed, in whole or
hi pan, and new Bylaws adopted by the vote or w~tmn consent of a mjority of the Dh~ctors
of the Associ~tlon. All members of the Associau'on shall be notified of all amendments to these
Bylaws.
Certification and Iaspe~.'on
Section 9.02. The orion.1 or a copy of the Byhws, as mended or otherwise ait~d w
da~, ~ by the Secreuh-y of the Assochfion, s~ll be ~ecorded and k~pt in a book which
shall be k~ in the pmciFal office of the Association, and such book shall be open to in~peaion
by the members at all ~asonable me during office hours,
ARTICI.I~. X. I~lq~ORTS, FISCAl, YEAR, INSIGNIA, AND SEAL
.~nnUal Report and l~anchl Statement
Section 10.131 (a) The Board of Diz~'wrs sh~ll cause a wdllell ~nnual repolI, including
a financial stammcnt, to be pv~0sred and submitw, d to the membe~ in April of each year. The
r~aort ~h=ll ,m,mmariZe the AssoH.rlon's activities for the pllCeding year alld activitic,s projected
for the forthcomln5 year.
(b) The financial statement sh=ll consist of a balance sh~t, as of the close
of business of the corpomion's fiscal year, a summa~ of rec~pts and disbursements, and be
prepa~i hi such manner and form as is ~,~nctioned by sound accounting practices and crucified
by the Treasurer or a certified public accountant.
A'R'ACHMENT 3
CITY ATTORNEY'S Lh ~ I ER
Mr. Gary Thol-n/%ill
August 27, 1994
Page 2
Although Section 2.03.provides that members are admitted upon the
approval by a majority of the Board of Directors or the Board's
designee, very few grounds exist for the Board to deny
membership. Thus, it is clear from the Bylaws that any merchant
of the Old Town area and others interested in the Old Town area
may become members of the Association.
The Bylaws also provide for members to be elected to
the Board of Directors governing the Association. Section 3.01
of the Bylaws provides for a seven member board of Directors to
govern the Association and Sec~cion 3.02 requires that a Director
of the Association be a member for at least one year. Section
3.06 provides for an election for certain Director positions each
year by the full membership. Meetings of the Board are governed
by Section 3.11, however no provision exists requiring Board of
Directors meetings to be open to members.
Section 6.01 of the Bylaws provides that the Board
shall set the time of regular meetings of the membership. Notice
to individual members of ~he meeting of the full membership need
not be given; provided, however, that such notice is required
before action can be taken on the following proposals: "(1) e
proposal to sell, lease, convey, exchange, transfer, or otherwise
dispose of all or substantially all of the property or assets of
the Association; (2) any proposal relating to the real property
of the Association; (3) any proposal to incorporate; (4) any
proposal to amend the Articles of this Association; or (5) any
proposal to dissolve the Association."
The Articles of Association provide broad powers to the
Association to implement the purposes of the Association.
Article II of the Articles of Association set forth the purposes
of the Association as follows:
"A. To promote and market Old Town Temecula;
B. To support economic development in and around 01d
Town Temecula;
C. To encourage the preservation end re-use of
historic structures in Old Town Temecula; and
D. To improve the general welfare and the civic
betterment of Old Town Temecula."
BUR~, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
Augtxst 27, 1994
Xr. Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
City of Temeculs
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
RECEIVED
AU63119
Re: Bylaws for the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association
Dear Gary:
I have reviewed the Articles of Association and the
Bylaws of the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association. The
qualifications for membership are minimal and allow for any
merchant or resident in the Old Town area, as well as other
interested persons, to become members of the Association. These
documents are sufficient to allow the AsSociation to function as
the administrator of the Mainstreet Program. If another entity
will administer the Program, these documents can serve as the
model documents for the new entity. Any agreement between the
City and the Association or another entity which will administer
the program should require that the Bylaws end Articles of
Association or Incorporation not be amended without the approval
of the City so as to allow the City to confirm that the
membership requirements and the authority of the entity are
consistent with Council policies.
The qualifications required to become a member of the
Association are set forth in Section 2.01 of the Bylaws which
provides:
"The qualifications for m~mhership are as [ollows: any
reputable person (at least eighteen (18} years of age),
business, association, corporation, partnership or
estate interested in the continued economic health and
cultural vitality of Old Town, shall be eligible for
membership."
Mar. Gary Thornhill
August 27, 1994
Page 3
Article III describes the legal powers of the Association. These
powers include (1) the power to sue and be sued, (2) the power to
enter into and perform contracts, (3) the power to enter into
commercial transactions authorized by the California Commercial
Code, (4) the power to buy, lease, sell and enc,m~er real
property and to cons=ruct buildings on real propel=y, and (5) the
power to conduct activities that ful-ther the pu_~oses of
Association. All of the powers of the Association ere qualified
by the fact that they must be exercise so as ~o further the
purposes of the Association set forth in Article II. Ar%icle IX
prohibits the Association from participation in or intervention
in any political campaign on behalf of a candidate for public
office.
If you have any fulwcher questions or comments, please
feel free to call me at any time.
CC.
Ronald Bradley
David Hogan/
Very truly yours,
Peter M. Thorson
of Burke, Williams & Sorensen
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I APPROVA~YR%.~~
CITY ATTORNEY
F NANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City CouncilSCity Manager
Joseph Kicak. Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Goals and Objectives
PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare
a resolution defining the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Goals and Objectives.
BACKGROUND:
Section 2.44.050 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code (Public/Traffic Safety Commission -
Powers and Duties) states that the duties of the public/traffic safety commission shall be
established by resolution of the City council.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has held two meetings, one in September and one in
October, to formulate a proposed list of Commission Goals and Objectives. The Commission
asked staff to be present to answer questions and provide input.
The outcome of the meeting was to present the tentative list of duties at the October 27th
meeting of the P/TSC for formal action. At that meeting the Commission voted 4 to 1 in favor
of presenting the attached list of duties to City Council for consideration. Commissioner
Guerriero was strongly opposed to the wording of item number 5, feeling that the commission
should NOT participate in the budget process at all. The other Commissioners felt that
participating in the budgeting activities by PREVIEWING and COMMENTING could only help
by supplying additional data for Staff to make an informed decisions. Staff felt that the
Commissioners understood that their comments were oniy advisory and felt that they would
feel no animosity for non-inclusion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments: Proposed Duties of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
-l- r;~aldrpt~4~] 129~u~ies,~om/a. lp
PUILICfilAIzMC St~/ssl-:k COMMISSION
wt~by tbe Cin/Concil, m-ve mdse Cby Coundrs princilnl reviewing body; and, c) upon
Tint ,he Com~t.-ion shall be prepsml m ~ all Ci~ Co,,--i,.-iom on martins of
publictnfiic safety and trusponation.
ITEM 16
APPROVAL E~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
November 29, 1994
Establishing and Amending Time Limits
Redevelopment Plan 1-1988
in the County of Riverside
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the following Ordinance:
RESOLUTION N0.94 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING
AND AMENDING TIME LIMITS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN 1-1988
BACKGROUND:
On July 12, 1988, the County of Riverside, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula,
duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a Redevelopment Plan, known as the "County of
Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988, (hereinafter referred to as the "Temecula Plan"). The
City of Temecula was then incorporated on December 1, 1989. All the Project Area of the
Temecula Ran was entirely within the corporate boundaries of the City of Temecula.
Pursuant to City Ordinance 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance
No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Plan. These
Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to
Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-03, Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at Section 8.04.010 of
the Temecula Municipal Code.
In addition, at the time the Temecula Redevelopment Agency took over the Temecula Plan
from the county, the City and Agency entered in a Stipulated Judgement in the case entitled
Robert Dawes, Save Historical Temecula v. Redevelopment Agency of the County of Riverside,
et. al. Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 194468 MF, consolidated with Case No.
' 194948. This Judgemerit imposed various additional limitations on the Plan, including that,
subject to certain exceptions, no more than ~60,000,O00of tax increment revenues shall be
allotted or I~aid to the Agency during the term of the Plan.
The Community Redevelopment Law was amended in 1993 Assembly Bill 1290 {Chapter 942
of 1993.) Assembly Bill 1290 ("AB 1290") amended Section 3333.6 of the Health and Safety
Code to require that a redevelopment plan which either lacks the required time limits or which
contains time limits in excess of the maximums established by AB 1290 must be amended by
ordinance on or before December 31, 1994, to bring the plan into conformity with these
requirements.
Specifically, Section 33333.6 mandates that the City adopt an ordinance establishing the
following time limits on the Temecula Plan:
1. Section 33333.6(a) mandates that the time period for establishing debt be
limited to twenty years from the adoption of the Plan or the year 2004, which ever is later.
Because the Temecula Plan presently permits debt to be incurred for up to forty years, it must
be amended to require that all debt be established prior to July 12, 2008, which is twenty
years after the adoption of the Temecula Plan.
2. Section33333.6)(b)providesthattheeffectivenessofeveryredevelopmentplen
shall terminate forty years after its adoption or January 1,2009, whichever is later. After that
time, the redevelopment agency shall have no authority to act pursuant to the plan except to
pay previously incurred indebtedness and to enforce existing covenants, contracts end other
obligations. The Temecula Plan presently has a forty year term and expires on July 12, 2028.
However, it does not expressly state that the Agency shall have no authority to act after the
forty years. Consequently, an amendment is necessary to state that after the Temecula Plan
expires on July 12, 2028, the Agency shall have no authority to act.
3. Section 33333.6(c) mandates that, subject to certain exceptions, an agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes ten years after the termination of the
effectiveness of the plan. The Temecula Plan has no such limitation, and consequently must
be amended to require that the Redevelopmerit Agency not pay indebtedness or receive
property taxes after July 12, 2038, which date is ten years after the termination of the
effectiveness of the Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
-n~!F, CULA ESTABLr~t~NG AND AMENDING TIME LIM1TS IN THF~
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ]~EDEVELOPIVrENT PLAN 1-1988
WHEREAS, on July 12, 1988, the County of Riverside, prior to the incorporation of
the City of Temecula, duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a Redevelopment Plan,
known as the *County of Riverside Redevelopmerit Plan 1-1988, (heronafter referred to as
the *Temecula Plan");
W!tEREAS, subsequent to the enactment of the Temecula Plan, the City of Temecula
was incortnnated on December 1, 1989;
WVR~_AS, all the territory to which the Temecula Plan applies (hereinafter referred
to as the "Project Area ") is now within the coxporate boundaries of the City of Temecula;
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Ordinance 91-11, which became effective May 9,
1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City
approved the Temecula Plan. Said. Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Temecula Plan
and transferring jurisdiction over the Temecula Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-03,
Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at Section 8.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code;
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Temecula Plan to
incorporate certain time limits mandated by Assembly Bill 1290 (Chapter 942 of 1993.)
Assembly Bill 1290 ("All 1290") amends Section 33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code to
require tht a redevelopment plan which either lacks the required time limits or which
contains lime limits in excess of the maximums established by All 1290 must be amended by
ordinance on or before December 31, 1994, to bring the plan into conformity with these
requirements. This Ordinance is enacted as mandated by and in accordance with Section
33333.6;
WHI~-REAS, Section 33333.6 establishes certain limitations on the incurring and
repaying of indebtedness and the duration of redevelopment plans, which limitations apply to
every redevelopment plan adopted on or before December 31, 1993;
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6(a) mandates that the time period for establishing debt
be limited to twenty years from the adoption of the plan or the year 2004, which ever is
later. Because the Temecula Plan presently permits debt to be incurred for up to forty years,
it must be amended to require that all debt be established prior to July 12, 2008, which is
twenty years after the adoption of the Temecula Plan;
o~66 I
~Ik'~-Y_AS, Section 33333.6Co) provides that the effectiveness of every
redevelopmerit plan shall terminate forty years after its adoption or lanuary 1, 2009,
pursuant to the plan except to pay previously incurred indebtedne~ and to enforce existing
covenants, eonwacts and other obligations. Although the Temecuh Plan tm a forty year
t~m, it does not e~__sly state that the Agency shall have no authority to act after the forty
years, and consequen~y, and amendment is necessary to incorporate this limitation;
WVIRREAS, Section 33333.6(c) mandates that subject to certain exceptions, and
agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive In'openy taxes ten years afar the tr. tmination of
the effectiveness of the plan. The Temecula Plan has no such limitation, and consequen~y
must be amended to reflect this requirement;
WItRRY. AS, the incorporation into the Temecula Plan of the time limits set forth in
Section 33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code is mandated by law and is therefore not a
discretionary act of the City. Accordingly, this section does not constitute a project within
the meaning of the California Envi~oamental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section
2100 et. ll!IR.) and is not subject to environmental review; and
WI:IEREAS, pursuant to the judgment entered into the case entitled Robert Dawes.
Save I4istoric~l Temecula v. Redevelqpment Agency of the Count, of Riverside. et. al.
Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 194468 lVIF, consolidated with Case No. 194948,
various additional limitations are placed on the Temecula Plan, including that, subject to
certain exceptions, no more than $60,000,000 of tax increment revenues shall be alloRed or
paid to the Agency during the term of the Plan.
NOW THERI~ORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain
as follows:
S~ion l. Section 540 of the Plan is amended to r~d as follows:
"FINANCING LIMITATIONS.
Consistent with Sections 33333.2 and 33334.1 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law, the following financing limitations are imposed on this Plan:
Taxes, as defined in Section 33670 of the Redevelopment Law shall not be divided
and shall not be allocated to the Agency in excess of One Billion One Hundred Ten
Million Dollars 61,110,000,000) except by amendment of this Plan. This limitation
is subject to the limits on the incurrance of debt, if any, imposed by the Final
Judgment in the case antifled Robert ])awes. Save Histori~l Temec~la v.
Redevelopment Agency of the County of Riverside. et. ~!. Riverside County Superior
Court Case No. 194468 MF, consolidated with Case No. 194948.
oeis66 2
No leans, advances, or indebtedness to finance, in whole or in pan, the Project, and
to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the before-mentioned
Section 33670, shall be es~hlished or incurred by the Agency beyond July 12, 2008,
which date is twenty (20) years from the date of adoption of this Plan. However,
such loans, advances, or indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time longer
than such time limit.
From time to time as may be appropriate, the Agency may issue bends and/or notes
for any of its corporate purposes. The Agency may issue such ~ of bends on
which the principal and interest are payable in whole or in pan from the tax
increments. The total outstanding principal of any bonds so issued and repayable
from said tax increments shall not exceed Three Hundred Forty Million Dollars
($340,000,000) at any one time, except by amendment of this Plan.
Tax increment revenues generated in each of the noncontiguous portions of the
Project area shall be accounted for separately and shall be used to benefit the
respective communities in which such revenues were generated."
Smlon2. Section 610 of the Plan is mended to read as follows:
'DURATION OF PLAN AL-rlvrrL~
Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation pwvisions which shall
run in perpetuity, the effectiveness of this Plan shall terminate July 12, 2028, which date is
forty (40) years from the date of adoption of this Phn. After July 12, 2028, the Agency
shall have no authority to act pursuant to the Plan except to pay previously incurred
indebtedness and to enforce existing covenants, contracts and other obligations. The Agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33670 after July 12, 2038, except as otherwise specifically permitted under Health
and Safety Code Section 33333.6"
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption.
The City Clerk is directed to publish and post this Ordinance as is required by law.
Onis6~ 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPIll) this 2~)th day of November, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Rot~rts, Mayor
June S. (]leek, City ~k
STATE OF CAt,n:ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVEP, SIDE)~s
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
raceling of the City Council on the 29th day of November, 1994, and that thereaft'r, said
Ordinance was duly adopt~l and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 29th
day of November, 1994, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCK,M~-MBERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNC~ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5
ITEM 1
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:
November 29, 1994
SUBJECT: Community Services Funding Program
Prepared by: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding
Grants for FY 1994/95.
BACKGROUND:
At the request of the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Birdsall met with
Shawn Nelson and Mary Jane McLarney to review the applications submitted to the City for
funding consideration. Attachment A lists these requests along with prior year funding and
the recommended amount for FY 1994/95. It should be noted that in addition to the
9100,000 in the City Council discretionary fund, this year's budget includes 920,000 in the
Community Service District for funding the Arts. The Committee is recommending that
915,000of this amount be allocated to the Arts Council and 95,000 be allocated for City arts
functions such as the Summer Concert Series.
In addition to the requests from non-profit organizations, we have included a 94,000 matching
grant for funding approval. This grant was a joint application with the Temecula Valley Unified
School District for a Federal Community Service Learning Program which will provide K-12
students the opportunity to perform community services as part of their basic curriculum.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of 9120,000 is available for this program.
ATTACHMENT: CSD Funding Program 1994/95 Applicants
'DEPARTMENTAL
'REPORTS
APPROVAL:
CITY ATFORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FRO M:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building OfficiaL/'~'r_--
November 29, 1994
Building and Safety October 1994, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for October 1994:
Building Permits Issued ............................................. 146
Building Valuation .......................................... ~4,743,243
Revenue Collected .......................................... $87,636.76
Housing Starts .................................................... 44
Building Inspections ............................................. 3,140
Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 375
Active Cases Pending ............................................... 75
Closed Cases .................................................... 15
V:\TONY%REPORTS\OCT'94.RPT 11/7/94 tda
APPROVA
C ATTORNEY
~11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning'~r
November 29, 1994
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Discussion:
Caseload Activity:
Receive and File
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of October, 1994:
The Department received twelve (12) applications for administrative cases and one (1)
application for a public hearing case for the month of October as follows:
Development Agreement
0ngoing Projects:
Total
Old Town Streetscape ImOrovement Project: The consultant interviews for the West
Main Street Demonstration Project are finished. EPT (Eriksson, Peters and Thomas)
was the top rated firm. The contract has been finalized. Council approval is expected
in December.
Old Town Redevelooment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman and Gene
Hancock. The remaining feasibility studies are expected to be completed shortly.
Development Code: The Advisory Committee has completed its review of the Draft
Code. A joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce a
public hearing draft of the development code is being scheduled. A draft zoning map
will also be presented at the workshop.
French Valley AirD0rt: The ALUC will be meeting on December 14 to recommend
approval to the County Board of Supervisors for the FEIR, Facility Master Plan and the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport.
Nicolas Vallev Soecial Study: The contract has been finalized and was approved by
Council in October.
Temecula Re(3ional Center Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact Reoort: The
Regional Center Specific Plan was approved at the July 18, 1994 Planning Commission
meeting and October 11, 1994 City Council meeting. The Environmental Impact
Report 340 prepared for the Regional Center was certified by the City Council on July
13, 1992.
CamDos Verdes Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Reoort: The Campos Verdes
Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were approved at the September
13, 1994 City Council meeting.
Winchester Hills This Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report have been placed
on hold by the applicant.
Murdv Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Imoact Report: Applicant has responded
to staff's comments on the Specific Plan. The Addendum to the EIR has been
circulated for public review and the applicant is preparing the response to comments.
The applicant has requested additional time in order to file for a Development
Agreement application. After the Development Agreement is submitted and reviewed
by staff, this item will be scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council
hearings.
Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: This item will be scheduled for a January 1995 Planning
Commission hearing.
Rorioauoh Ranch Specific Plan: Planning staff is preparing the Notice of Preparation
to begin the Environmental impact Report (EIR) process. Staff held a Development
Review Committee meeting with the applicants on September 15, 1994 to discuss
staff's general concerns with the project, The applicant has submitted the Specific
Plan for staff's review. After reviewing the Specific Plan a Planning Commission date
will be determined. Staff is reviewing the amended Specific Plan and negotiating on
the Development Agreement. A tentative Planning Commission date has been set for
December 5, 1994.
Attachment:
1. Revenue and Status Report - Page 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
ACCOUNT #
14:53:36
GENERAL FUND
pLANNING
DESCRIPTION
CZTY OF TENECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
OCTOBER 1994
ADJUSTED OCTOBER 1994-95
ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE
PAGE 1
BALANCE ,% COL
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
&109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
41'
41
412~
4125
4126
4127
4120
4131
4136
4139
4140
4142
4143
RMENDED FINAL HAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TZNE
SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS
HULTI-FAHZLY TRACTS
pARCEL MAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
MINOR CHANGE
pARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND UNIT pERMITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERHZT
REVISED pERMIT
GETBACI( ADJUSTMENT
SPECIFIC pLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNANCE
TEHORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TEMPORARY USE PERHIT
VARZANCB
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
.00 .00 .00 .00
,00 .00 325.00 3Z~.O0'
.00 ,00 .00 .00
.00 .O0 704.00 704.00-
.00 .00 5,8.~.00 5,8~,,.00-
.00 ,00 .00 .00
.00 102.00 4,600.00 4,600.00'
.00 2;30,00 230.00 Z$O.OO-
.00 .00 940.00 940.00'
.00 .00 ,00 .00
,00 .00 .O0 .00
,00 .O0 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 5,49Z.00 5#49Z.00'
.00 .00 7,630.00 7,630.00'
,00 .00 ,OO ,00
.00 ,O0 ,00 ,00
170,000.00 ~528.00 ' 1,614.00 168,386.00
.00 590.00 1,180.00 1,180.00'
.00 .00 1,180.00 1,180.00'
.00 250.00 250.00 250.00-
.00 .00 35,654,00 35,654.00-
.00 1,426.00 4,278.00 4,Z78.00'
.00 113.00 437.00 437.00-
,00 ,00 ,OO ,00
,00 .00 .00 .OO
· OO .00 ,OO ,OO
,00 .00 1,877.90 1,877.90'
.00 .00 Z,6Zg.00 2,6Z9.00'
.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4~000.00'
,00 .00 .00 .00
.00 ,00 .00 .00
,00 .00 .00 .00
,00 ,00 ,00 .00
.00 500.00 SOO.O0 500.00-
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .OO ,00 .00
.00 .00 .O0 .OO
.00 .00 .00 ,00
,00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .OO
.00 .O0 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.O0 ,00 .00 .00
.DO .00 .00 .00
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4169
4170
4180
4200
4206
4226
4260
4261
4262
436~.
DESC~[PTXON
VACATXONS pLAN CK
DOCUNENT pROCESSiNG
CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CNECK
PARCEL NAP pLAN CHECK
TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK
AHENDED NAP PLAN CHECK
4TN & SUBS. $UEM[TTALS
FF.~A STUOY REVUE14
LOMA REVIEg
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIE~
ZNPROV; INSPECTION ON*SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK pLANNIRG
FORNA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE pLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATION FEES
TEMPORARY USE PER~IT
ACCESSORY t4XND ENERGY
LARGE FAHILY DAY OARE
HAZARDOUS ~4ASTE FACILITY
LAND DZV UNIT NAP
LANDSrAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANNZNG
CITY OF TENEOJLA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
OCTOBER 1994
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
,00
,00
,00
.00
,00
.00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
.00
,00
· ,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
170,000.00
OCTOBER
REVERUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
750.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
4,455.00
12,9~.00
1994-95
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
3,520,00
710.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
18,370.00
101,96~.90
BALANCE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
3,520.00-
710.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
18,370.00-
68,035.10
PAGE
COL
60.0
REPT155 COUNT & VALUATION SUHHARY BY TYPE PAGE
11/21/9~ 13:05 Subtotal: Cnstr Type
Range I 10/01/9~Thru 10/31/~ OCTOBER 1~ Date Type: 1
; (SeLect):PLAN
A/P/D Type Construction type Comt Sq Feet VaLuation Fees Paid
A PLANNING CASEol~9~
DEVELOPHENT AGREEHENT
Fen TRACKIHC PURR)F~:C
LOT LINE ADJUSTNENT
NERGER OF CONT. PARCELS
NINOR/NAJOR EVENT/PROFIT
NINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT
HINOR PUBLIC USE PERNIT
PLOT PLAN ADNINISTRATIVE
SETBACK ADJUSTNENT
SUBSTAN CONFORN-GENERAL
1 0 .00 4,550.00
1 0 .00 .00
1 0 .00
1 0 .00 133.00
1 0 .OO 50.00
1 0 .00 888.00
~ 0 .00 2,605.00
1 0 .00 270.00
2 0 ,UO 740.00
14 0 .00 10,814.00 *
TOTAL ** 14 0 .00 10,814.00 **
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 29, 1994
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for October, 1994.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
NOVEMBER, 1994
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo
Date: November 17, 1994
I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. Pala Community Park:
Construction began on August 15, 1994. The masons have completed setting and
grouting the reinforced block concession stand. Lumber has been delivered to the site
and the building should be fully enclosed by the end of the month. The soccer field,
tennis courts and basketball courts have been fine graded. The water mainline
servicing the park has passed inspection and the service meters are expected to be
installed by the end of the month. SCE and GTE have also installed their service lines.
The sewer lateral has been installed and will be connected to a system that is to be
built by an adjacent developer prior to the opening of the park. Curb and gutter has
been placed and the asphalt road and parking lots should be completed by the end of
the month.
Several items of work are scheduled to be completed during the month of December,
1994. The play surfaces of the tennis and basketball courts, the irrigation system, the
soccer field light footings and the hardscape within the park should be completed by
the end of December, 1994. Construction is approximately 35% complete and is
scheduled to be completed by June 1995.
2. SPOrtS Park Slooe Reoair:
Construction began at the end of April, 1994. The construction of the project has
been completed and the 90-day maintenance period began October 3, 1994. The
project is expected to be accepted by the beginning of January, 1995. The project
consisted of the reconstruction of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of
an irrigation system and landscaping on the reconstructed slope, and the
reconstruction of a portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park.
3. Loma Linda Park - Ih
Construction began the end of July, 1994. The construction of the project has been
completed and the 90-day maintenance period began October 31, 1994. The project
is scheduled to be accepted by the beginning of February, 1995. The project consists
of grading and the installation of irrigation, landscaping, play equipment and other
amenities.
pwO4\moectrpt\cip\94~Nov 11/16/94
Monthly Activity Report
November 17, 1994
Page 2
4. Ynez Road Landscal)e Imorovements:
On October 13, 1994 the construction of Ynez Road Landscaping Improvements was
completed, which began a 90 calendar day landscaping maintenance period. During
this maintenance period there will be a monthly walk through until the project is
accepted.
5. Traffic Sional at Winchester Rd. (HWY. 79N) & Nicolas Rd.
City Council awarded the contract to Paul Gardner Corporation. The project consists
of constructing a temporary three-way traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester
(HWY. 79N) and Nicolas Road. On October 20, 1994 the contract time of 90 working
days began and will end on March 7, 1995. The contractor has ordered the traffic
signal poles with delivery expected in 14 to 16 weeks. The contractor will be
performing all the necessary underground work during the next few weeks.
6. Traffic Signal Modification at Rancho California Rd. & Front St.:
The contractor has completed the work and staff will be recommending acceptance
of the project at the City Council meeting on December 13, 1994.
7. Kent Hinterqardt Memorial Park:
Construction began August 22, 1994 and is approximately 80% complete. Work is
expected to be completed prior to the end of December, 1994. The contractor has
completed setting and grouting the reinforced block concession stand and is scheduled
to complete the roof, concrete slab and the sewer lateral by the end of November,
1994. The project consists of the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand
and rest room facility with a 225 square foot porch.
8. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation:
On November 15, 1994 City Council awarded a contact to Paul Gardner Corp. A
preconstruction meeting will be held at the end of the month. The project includes the
installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized
intersections and Vehicle Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire
Department vehicles.
9. Pala Road/Route 79S interim Imnrovements:
On November 10, 1994 the bids were opened. Staff will recommend the award of
contact to Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc. at the City Council meeting on November 29,
1994. The work to be performed includes, construction of asphalt pavement, traffic
striping and signing, embankment construction, and traffic control to construct a right
turn lane for traffic proceeding east on Route 79S to south on Pala Road.
pwO4~moectrpt\cip%94\Nov 11/16/94
Monthly Activity Report
November 17, 1994
Page 3
10. Winchester Road Interim RamD Improvements:
The bid opening was held on November 17, 1994. Staff will recommend the award
of contract to Chance Edmondson at the City Council meeting on November 29, 1994.
This project will widen the south side of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue
and the 1-15 south bound on-ramp, which will create an exclusive east bound right
turn lane onto the south bound I-15. Also, the north side of Winchester Road will be
widened to provide for a smother transition from the south bound I-15 off-ramp going
west on Winchester Road. The existing traffic signal will be modified to provide for
these widenings and the landscaping and irrigation will be installed adjacent to the
proposed street improvements.
I1. PROJECTS BEING BID:
1. Traffic Sic~nal at Margarita Rd, & Avenida Barca:
The bid opening will be on December 1, 1994. This project is Federally funded and
consists of the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the
intersection of Margarita Rd. and Avenida Barca.
III. WORK IN DESIGN
1. I-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications:
The Project Report will be signed when the recently acquired Fish and Game permit
is received by Caltrans. Plans and specifications have been sent to Caltrans for final
review. The City has obtained the services of Riverside County to help in the
acquisition of right-of-way. The project is proceeding on schedule for bid advertising
early next year.
2. Walcott Corridor:
Staff returned RBF & Associates first plan check on October 3, 1994. Staff is
expecting RBF to return the second plan check on the week of November 14, 1994.
The project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 32' of pavement width) within
66' wide graded dedicated right-of-way. The alinement will follow the existing right-
of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design speed. The total length of the project is
approximately 8,500 feet.
pwO4~moactrpt\cip%94~Nov 11/16/94
Monthly Activity Report
November 17, 1994
Page 4
3. Soorts Park Parking and Skate Board Park:
Second plan check comments are expected to be returned to the engineer by the end
of November, 1994. The engineer should complete the revisions and resubmit for a
third plan check by the beginning of January, 1995. The plans and specifications are
expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the beginning of February, 1995.
The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey
rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot.
4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Imorovement Project:
Second plan check comments were returned to the architect November 9, 1994. The
architect should complete the revisions and resubmit for a third plan check by the
beginning of December, 1994. The plans and specifications are expected to be ready
for the solicitation of bids by the end of January, 1995. The improvements include the
construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt
parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities.
The construction activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum
and church renovation projects.
5. Moraga Rd. Street Widening:
The Consultant submitted the second plan check back to the City on November 4,
1994. Staff expects to return the plan check to the consultant on the week of
November 21, 1994. This project required a redesign of the box culvert outlet
structure due to the significant changes in the existing site conditions which were
created after the rains in the past year and a half. Staff is working on obtaining Fish
& Game, Army Corp of Engineer, and the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board approvals.
6. Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Imorovements:
All notices have been sent out to the utility companies to inform them of a Capital
Improvement Project and the plans, specifications, and cost estimate will be
completed by January 1995. This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for
Fiscal Year 1994-95. This project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600
square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. between Mira Loma
Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho
Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of
Avenida de la Reina.
pwO4%rnoactfpt\cip\94\Nov 11116/94
Monthly Activity Report
November 17, 1994
Page 5
7. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements - RFP No. 26:
An RFP has been prepared and sent out to qualified firms to provide professionaJ
engineering services for the construction of a storm drain from Ynez Road to Acacia
Park Resort Apartments. The deadline for filing the RFP's is November 28, 1994. The
improvements to be constructed includes but limited to grading, main line storm drain,
utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic control.
8. I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The Project Report was submitted to Caltrans in mid-September and is currently being
reviewed.
9. I-15/Overland Drive Overcrossina Imorovements:
The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and signed by
Caltrans. The bridge plans will be submitted to Caltrans Division of Structures for
review by the middle of December. Caltrans also has decided that conventional Type
I retaining walls should be used for this project.
pwO4\moectrpt\cip\94\Nov 11/16/94
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
October, 1994
Submitted by: Josel~h Kicak
f/-~Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
Date: November 14, 1994
FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has
reimbursed the City a total of $418,758 to date. The Murrieta Creek Damage Survey Report was
recently determined to be a valid claim bringing the total cumulative reimbursable amount to
$1,080,996.
PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO, PW93-09}:
The Preliminary Grading Plan has been submitted to the City and is currently being reviewed by
Staff. Minor revisions to the site plan are being discussed which may result in construction cost
savings and reduced visual impacts.
.SSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159):
The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction:
Temecula Creek is under construction and the improvements are nearly complete.
The Butterfield Stage Road, Pauba Road and DePortola Road improvements are complete and
the roads are nearly ready for City acceptance.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 161):
The construction of Nicolas Road, as part of AD 161, has been completed and the road is ready for
City acceptance.
Attached is the anticipated schedule of events for the months of November and December.
CALLE PINA COLADA BYPASS (PROJECT N0,94-16):
City Staff's comments on the study were transmitted to the design engineer who is in the process
of incorporating them.
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMEN'I' PROJECT:
Certain improvements are contemplated in conjunction with the Old Town Entertainment Project.
For provision of the engineering services, the following Request for Proposals (RFP) have be
distributed to consultants:
RFP//27 "Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor"
Consultants' proposals have been reviewed and the selection process is underway. A
recommendation will be made to the Redevelopment Agency once the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee approves the expenditure of funds (most likely at the
December 13, 1994 meeting).
RFP//28 "First Street Extension"
Consultants' proposals have been reviewed and the selection process is underway. A
recommendation will be made to the Redevelopment Agency once the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee approves the expenditure of funds (most likely at the
December 13, 1994 meeting).
RFP//29 "Rancho California Road/Front Street Intersection Improvements"
Consultants' proposals have been reviewed and the selection process is underway. A
recommendation will be made to the Redevelopment Agency once the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee approves the expenditure of funds (most likely at the
December 13, 1994 meeting).
RFP//30 "Old Town Parking Study"
The firm of Robert Khan, John Kain & Associates, Inc., was selected to carry out the study.
A rough draft is expected to be submitted to Staff for review in mid-December.
r:lmomctzT~lld~v1941C)~lob~
November 3, 1994
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
November, 1994
$1.9 Million in 3rd District Developer Agreement Funds
Advanced for Mumeta Hot Springs Road West
Board of Supervisors Receives CRSS/Spink Initial Report
re: Assessment Engineering
Review of Distdct Soft Costs Conducted by Webb
Associates and CAO
Financial Statements for September, 1994 to be Distributed
by TLMA
Begin Construction of Winchester Road, MHS Road to
Hunter Road
Contract Award for Mumeta Hot Springs Road West
approved by Board of Supervisors
Completion of 6.8 Million Gallon Reservoir, Mountainview
Ranch
December, 1994
Webb Associates and CAO complete Review of District Soft
Costs
Preparation of Engineer's Report for Re-spread of
Assessment Liens
Construction Underway on Winchester Road
Begin Construction of Mumeta Hot Springs Road West (?)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
November 1, 1994
Monthly Activity Report - October 1994
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of October 1994:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
Ill. POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
VII. STENCILING
A. 482 new and repainted legends
B. 9,061 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
C. 675 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
11
26
1
58
92
346
39,155
7
332
r:~roads%actrpt~94~10 skg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1994
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 33 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 14 service order requests for the month of September, 1994.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 43 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followina:
· 18,484 L.F. of new and repainted striping
· 1,543 L.F. of sand blasting
The total cost for Orange County striping services was $4,245.91 compared to $0.00 for September,
1994.
PESTMASTER SERVICES has comoleted the followinQ:
· 0 sites, 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $0.00 for
September, 1994.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of October, 1994 was
$13,528.62 compared to $26,271.00 for the month of September, 1994.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$8,633.62
$4,895.00
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
r:\roeds~aetrpt~94~lO skg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1994
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December.
NELSON PAVING AND SEALING
Account No. 5401
Date: October 3, 1994
Ynez Channel
Clear silt and debris and reinforced rip-rap areas with P.C.C.
Total Cost $2,375.00
Account No. 5401
Date: October 6, 1994
Del Rey Road w/o Via Norte
R & R A.C. area 1,100 S.F.
Total A.C, 20Tons
Total Cost $4,385.70
Account No. 5402
Date: October 20, 1994
2 person crew 8 hours filling potholes Citywide
Total Cost $936.00
r:\roads\actrpt~94\10 skg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1994
Page No. 4
HOUSTON HARRIS
Account No. 5401
Date: October 3, 1994
Video pipe inspection of storm drain due to
debris in line
Hydrowash line at 44115 Highlander
Video pipe inspection of line on Highlander
Hydrowash line at Rancho Vista
1.0 hr
2.0 hrs
2.0 hrs
2.0 hrs
DEL RIO CONTRACTORS
Account No. 5401
Date: October 7, 1994
Vallejo Channel
Removed silt and debris and reinforced rip-rap areas with P.C.C.
Total Cost $2,375.00
ARBOR PRO TREE SERVICE
Account No. 5402
Date: October 17, 1994
20 Trees trimmed Citywide
Total Cost $900.00
K.L.M. ENGINEERING (Emergency Street Repair)
ACcount No. 5402
Date: October 27, 1994
Front Street
Remove and replace failing curb and gutter
Total Cost $2,411.92
$135/hr
135~r
135/hr
135~r
TOTAL
9135.00
270.00
270.00
270.QQ
$945.00
r:\roeds~eg:trpt~94~10 ekg
DATE
10-05-94
10-05-94
10-05-94
10-06-94
10-10-94
10-10-94
10-10-94
10-10-94
_ 1 O- 17-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-25-94
10-26-94
10-26-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
TREE TRIMMING - OCTOBER, 1994
LOCATION I
Solana Way WIO Stonewood Road Trimmed
Solana Way E/O Motor Car Parkway Trimmed
Margarita N/O Ave. Barca Trimmed
Area # 2 Trimmed
(See Daily for location)
Via Norte @ La Cadaria Court Trimmed
Ave. Buena Suerte @ Del Ray Trimmed
31100 Del Ray Trimmed
Rancho Calif, Rd. @ Trimmed
Long Valley Wash
Diaz Road between Winchester Trimmed
and Rancho California Road
Calla Violeta & Mira Loma Drive Trimmed
29670 Valle Olvera Trimmed
40440 Carmelita Trimmed
Front Street N/O Trimmed
Rancho Calif. Road
Sixth Street @ Felix Valdez Trimmed
Meadows @ Rancho Vista Trimmed
Margarita @ Southern Cross Trimmed
WORK COMPLETED
1 Tree
5 Trees
3 Trees
4 Trees
3 Trees
2 Trees
7 Trees
I Tree
14 Trees
4 Trees
3 Trees
2 Trees
2 Trees
2 Trees
1 Trees
4 Trees
TOTAL
TREES
TRIMMED
-1- pwO3'wmd~\wkcmp~d~q4\10.T~et 110294
I ~,~
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-04-94
10-05-94
10-05-94
10-05-94
10-06-94
10-07-94
10-11-94
10-14-94
1 o-17-94
10-19-94
10-20-94
10-24-94
10-24-94
10-31-94
.I
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED- OCTOBER, 1994
SIGNS
· 't;OC;ATION ·: · "" ' 'WORK COMPLETED"
El Torito Court Installed
Margarita @ Solana Way Replaced
Rainbow Canyon @ Rainbow BIvd. Installed
Solana Way W/O Stonewood Replaced
Solana Way @ Via La Vida Replaced
Margarita N/O Rancho Calif. Rd. Replaced
Winchester Road E/O Replaced
Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Diaz Road @ Winchester Road Installed
Pala Road @ Edwardo Replaced
Front Street @ Rancho Calif. Rd. Installed
Amberly @ Enfield Repaired
Vallejo & Palma Drive Installed
Sports Park Installed
Diaz Road S/O Rio Nieto Installed
Front S/O Rancho Calif. Rd. Installed
Margarita @ N. Gen. Kearney Replaced
N.W.S.
R-1 & S.N.S. "T~C."
2 Modified W-20
R-2 "45" & W-66 "Faded"
R-1-3 "Stolen"
SR 4-A, R-26, W-66,
"Paint Gun"
P.D. Directional "T.C."
W-53
S.N.S. "T.C."
2 "C.I.P" Signs
S.N.S.
4 R-26, 4 End/Begin W-31
2"N"
6 R-26
W-11
3 Carsonites & "K" Marker
W-7 "T.C."
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 1 t
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 26
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED __!_
m
PWG3~R. OADS/WIG:~,tPLTD~94~I0..SIGNS 110194
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
OCTOBER 1994
CA TCH BASINS
DATE
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-04-94
10-05-94
,~t)-05-94
10-11-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-13-94
10-13-94
10-17-94
I LOCATION
Area #1
(See Daily for locations)
Pina Colada ~) Del Rey Road
30135 Milano
Area #1
Area #2, 3 & 4
Area #1
Area #1
Area #2
Area #2
Area's 1,2, 3 & 4
(Storm surveilance)
Area #3
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
Cleaned &
Secured
WORK COMPLETED
6 Catch Basins
I Catch Basins
2 Catch Basins
13 Catch Basins
7 Catch Basins
75 Catch Basins
65 Catch Basins
5 Catch Basins
73 Catch Basins
29 Catch Basins
70 Catch Basins
TOTAL
CATCH 346
BASINS
CLEANED
-1- pwO3%roede~wkcmpltd%94~10.CB 110194
I DATE
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-21-94
10-24--94
10-2594
10-25-94
10-26o94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - OCTOBER, 1994
WEED ABATEMENT
Calle Medusa S/O Abated 1,000
Everest
Calle Medusa N/O Abated 1,000
Katherine
Pina Colada Abated 1,000
@ Del Rey
Via Lobo Channell Abated 5,750
29670 Valle Olvera Abated 80
40440 Carmelita Abated 125
Rancho Calif. Road Abated 13,000
E/O Margarita
Pala Road S/O Hwy. 79 Abated 5,000
Pala Road S/O Cupeno Abated 9,000
Sixth Street @ Abated 500
Felix Valdez
Rancho Calif. Road Abated 2,700
E/O Meadows
S.F. of RoO.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F.of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. W~
S.F. of Flowline Weeds
39.155 TOTAL SoF. R.O.W.
WEED ABATEMENT
-1- pwO3~osds\wbmpltd~94~lO.W~ds 110394
DATE
10-06-94
10-06-94
10-06-94
10-06-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-27-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1994
LOCATION I
Rancho Vista Road Removed
Pujol ~ Main Removed
Pujol ~ First Street Removed
Pale Channel N/O Lome Linda Removed
Ynez Road N/O Winchester Road Removed
Diaz Road S/O Winchester Road Removed
Rycrest ~ Solana Way Removed
WORK COMPLETED
164 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
80 S.F. of Graffiti
16 S.F. of Greffiti
12 S.F. of Graffiti
40 S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL
LOCATIONS
TOTAL S.F.
7
332
-1- pwO3~ids~wk~mpl~d~94\lO.Graffifi 110194
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-03-94
10-04-94
10-04-94
10.-04-94
10-04-94
10-05-94
10-10-94
10-11-94
10-11-94
1 O- 11-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-t4-94
10-17-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-19-94
10-20-94
10-24-94
10-24-94
10-24-94
10-25-94
10-25-94
30135 Mdano Road
45630 Rainbow Canyon Road
Sun West Materials
26040 Ynez Road
Highway 79 South
Lake Village tract
45521 Classic Way
31776 Corte Padrera
41875 "C" Street
42221 Main Street
39424 Canyon Rim Circle
1 O0 Calle Cortez
31366 Corte Montiel
31168 Calle Aragon
31226 Corte Talvera
Ave, Centenario
Front Street & Main Street
Yorba & Vallejo
Rancho California Road E/B
30511 Spica Court
Lower Highway 79 South
45059 Corte Bravo
Overland Drive @ Vail Ranch
31253 Nicolas Road
42031 Main Street
Corte Talvera
Winchester S/O Diaz Road
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - OCTOBER, 1994
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
" "'" ' ..... REQUEST.
Catch basin cleamng
Litter
Removal of sand and gravel
Litter
Litter
Catch basin cleaning
Tree trimming
Graffiti
Litter
Dumping in Murrita Creek
Power outage
Pothole
Trash concern
Tree trimming
Catch basin cleaning
Standing water
P.C.C. Driveway approach
Potholes
Litter
Tree trimming
Litter
Pothole
Glass in street
Trash dumped
Requests restroom cleaned
Oil Spill
Bad odor
WORK ..."~. ,.. ,..
COMPLETED.
10.04.94
10-04-94
10-04-94
10-04-94
10-04-94
10-05-94
10-05-94
10-06-94
10-05-94
10-11-94
10-11-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-14-94
10-19-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-18-94
10-19-94
10-20-94
10-24-94
10-24-94
10-24-94 --
10-25-94 ~
10-25-94
FwO3~osds\wbmlsltd%94~lO.sv~] 110/94
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG - OCTOBER, 1994
~ ' Q-26-94
· d-26-94
10-26-94
10-27-94
10-27-94
10-27-94
Margarita Middle School
Rancho California Road @
Margarita
30969 Pina Colada
Tower Plaza
I-15 Off ramp
31253 Nicolas Rd.
Manhole cover missing
Raised sidewalk
Tree removal
Flag at half mast
Litter
Trash
10-26-94
10-26-94
10-26-04
10-27-94
10-27-94
10-27-94
TOTAL S.O.R'$ 33
pwiD~ts\wbmplld~94%10.sm1 110'/94
DATE
10-06-g4
10-07-94
10-07-94
1 O-10-94
10-11-94
10-12-94
10-12-94
10-17-94
10-17-94
10-19-94
10-20-94
10-24-94
10-25-94
10-26-94
10-28-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - OCTOBER, 1994
STREET STENCILING
LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
Area #2 Repainted 13 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 320 L.F. of Red Curb
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted & Grind 10 Legends
(See Daily of locations).
Area #1 Repainted 78 L.F. of Red Curb
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 55 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 3,385 L.F. of Red Curb
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 147 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Diaz Road between Painted 5,356 L.F. of Red Curb
Winchester Road and
Rancho California Road
Area #3 Repainted 12 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Diaz Road between Painted 33 Legends
Winchester Road and
Rancho California Road
(See Daily for locations.)
Pauba Road @ Butterfield Stage Painted 21 Legends
(See Daily for details.).
Bike Lane Legends Repainted 39 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Bike Lane Legends Repainted 23 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 28 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
Area #1 Repainted 8 Legends
(See Daily for locations.)
PW~ROAI~/V/KL~TD\94\I0.~rN 110~94
STENCILING - OCTOBER, 1994
~ ~0-31-94 Area #1
(See Daily for locations)
Grind &
Repainted
15 Legends
TOTAL NEW &
REPAINTED
LEGENDS
TOTAL L.F. OF
RED CURB NEW
& REPAINTED
TOTAL S.F. OF
SANDBLASTING
& GRINDING
482
9.061
675
~o-~ °°°s s°s °s s~";[~l~ s ~ s s s s
~ "~oo8 °°08 °°8 °8 =~°e~;~ 8 8 8 8 g
z ~.~
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For October, 1994
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
Date: October 10, 1994
I. TRAFFIC REQUESTS
II.
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: · August: Sept. Oct.
Received 4 1 10
Completed 5 1 6
Under Investigation 6 6 9
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 1 0 1
DIVISION PROJECTS:
Completed a signing and striping plan for Rancho Vista Road from Ynez Road
to Via Del Campc. This plan provides for protected left turn lanes on Rancho
Vista Road, for both Loma Portola Drive and Mira Loma Drive. This also
includes an acceleration lane for making a left turn from Loma Portola Dr. to
Rancho Vista Road.
Replaced defective traffic signal equipment on Ynez Road at Motor Car Pkwy.
ACS also agreed to remove an existing speed bump on their exit to expedite
departures.
Participated as Staff representative at the final Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Goals and Objectives Workshop on September 8, 1994. The Commission
completed its refinements and recommended staff to submit the list of goals
and objectives to City Council of consideration. The Public Traffic Safety
Commission took action on this at their October 27th meeting.
Held a meeting with the Home Owners Association (HOA) that currently have
the old wooden street name signs. Because these signs do not meet current
safety and illumination standards, staff has been investigating the development
of an alternative. Input from effect HOA has aided staffs development of viable
substitutions.
Refined the traffic signal timing on Rancho California Road (RCR) at the Town
Center entrance by assigning the pedestrians crossing RCR to a separate
crossing phase which does not conflict with vehicles exiting the shopping
center.
The Public Traffic/Safety Commission thanked staff for an outstanding report
on pedestrian safety on Rancho Vista Road adjacent to the Temecula
Community Recreation Center and our Sports Park. They felt copies should be
forwarded to the City Council for their information.
r:%moactrpt\trar~c\94\octobcr,cab
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD OCTOBER 18, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:30
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Jeff Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone
I DIRECTORS: Parks
Also present were Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, General Counsel Peter
Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Roberrs, seconded by Director Mufioz to adjourn at 8:31 PM to a
meeting on November 15, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Parks
absent.
Jeff Stone, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk\Board Secretary
Minut~s. CSD\10lS~4
-1- 7/19/94
ITEM 2
FINANCE OFFIC R '7~//
CITY MANAGE~R,,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO;
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
November 29, 1994
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair
Project No. PW94-06.CSD
PREPARED BY: % ' Shawn D. Nelson - Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board accept the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, Project No. PW94-06.CSD,as
complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-
year Maintenance Bond {10% of contract amount),
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed to that date.
BACKGROUND:
On August 9, 1994, the Community Services Board of Directors awarded a construction
contract in the amount of thirty one thousand dollars ($31,000.00)to Trautwein Construction
to repair portions of the Long Valley Wash Channel which were damaged during the floods of
January, 1993.
The contractor has substantially completed the work within the allotted contract time to the
satisfaction of the Director of Community Services. The work was performed in accordance
with the approved plans and specifications and completed within the original contract amount
of ~31,000.00 without any change to the contract or additional costs. The construction
retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of
Completion has been recorded.
r:~agdrpt\94\1129~pw94-O6.acc/ejp
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract was awarded in the amount of $31,000.00o An additional amount of
$3,100.00 was approved for the contingency. There were no change orders for this project,
therefore the final adjusted contract amount for the project is $31,000.00. A total cost of
$19,950.00has been pre-approved for reimbursement by FEMA, Damage Survey Report Nos.
96048 & 96049. The balance of the funding required to match the total project amount, has
been transferred from TCSD Fund Balance and appropriated to the Capital Improvement Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
1)
2)
3)
Notice Of Completion
Contractor's Affidavit
Maintenance Bond
r:%agdrpt\94\1129\pw94-06 ,acc/ajp
REC01~DINQ REQU~S'rlm BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY ClERK
CITY OF 'I~MECULA
43174 keineee Perk Drke
Tememale, CA 92590
SPACE
ABOVE THll LINE FOR
RECORDER'I USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to: TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION
to perform the following work of improvement: LONG VALLEY WASH - CHANNEL REPAIR
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November
29, 1994. That upon said contract the INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA was surety for The
bond given by said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: LONG VALLEY WASH
(From Meadows Pkwy. to Calle Tajol).
6. The Assessor Parcel No. of said property is: 954-200-029
Dated at Temecula, California, this 29th day of November, 1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjun/, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
,1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Fo~M/CIP-e0I l~ev./2~J)1 pw13%dp~projecte~pw92-29b~cemplem.net
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND RNAL REiLa~E
PROJECT NO. PW94..O6CSD
LONG VALLEY WASH - CHANNEL REPAIRS
This iS tO certify that "~'~,~:~,L~.7'f.O~/AJ ~,,IE~. (hereinafter the
f
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that heat has been paid in full for
all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
Contractor with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of
improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW94-O6CSD LONG VALLEY WASH - CHANNEL REPAIRS
situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE
The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the Contractor.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the Contractor does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
Contractor has not disputed above.
Dated:
CONTRACTOR
Print Name and Title /
RELEASE R-1 rficipl,orojeet$~ow94-O6~bidpkg Rev: 03-30-94
0 i994
MAINTENANCE BOND
BOND NO: 157764P
PREMIUM: $ INCLUDED
IKCLUD~'D IN p~BFORMANCr B~ND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
TMAT we~ TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION , as Principal
and INDEI~NITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a c~rporation organized and doing business under m~d by
virtue of the laws e/the State of California and duly licensed to ~ndu ct surety business in the State of Callfoxing, as
SureW, are held and firmly bound unto
CITY OF TEMECULA
as Obliges, in the sum of THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND NO/100 - - ($3,100. O0 ..... )
Dollars, for which pa~nent, ell and truly to be made, we bind ounelves, our heirs, executors and successors.
jointly and severally firmly by these presenre
THE CONDITION OF THE OBLIGATION IS SUCH THA~..
WHEREAS, the above nmed Principal entered into an aFeement or I~reemente with said Ohiigee to:
PROJECT NO. PW94-O6CSD LONG VALLEY WASH-CHANNEL REPAIRS
WHERE AS. said easement provided that Principal shall ~uarsntee replacement and repair of improvements as
described therein for a period of one year following final acceptance of said improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above Principal s~mll indemnify the Obliges for all loss that Obliges may sustain by
reason of any defective materlal~ or workmanship which become apparent dm'ing the period of one year from and
after acceptance of the said improvements by Obliges, then tl~s obligation shall he void, otherwise to remain in full
force and effect
I~ W1TNE SS WHERE OF, the seal and signature of said Principal is hereto aff'n~ed an d the corporate seal a~d the
name of the said Surety is hereto affmed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney-imFact
this 7th day of NOVEMBER , 19 94
TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION
fryins, CA~92714
(714) 263-33~}
CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On NOVEMBER 7, 1994
PERSONALLY APPEARED
· before me,
MICHAEL D. STONG
SS.
ROSEMARY STANDLEY
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/
her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/
their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed
the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature
"i
This area for Official Notarial Seal
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form,
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TTTLEiSI
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMiTED
[] GENERAL
[] A'I'rORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
SIGNER(S) OTHER TH~,N NAMED ABOVE
,r~o~ P,~,. ~/~ ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
POWER OF ATTORNEY OF
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
P.O. BOX 19725. IRVINE, CA 92713 · (714) 263-3300
N9 160958
"ICF: 1. Allpowerandauthontyhereingrant~shalllnenyevemterminateonthe31stdayofMarch, 1996.
***MICHAEL D. STONG***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE }
On April 1, 1993, before me, Tiresa Teafua, personally appeared Dame F. Vlncenti, Jr. and Walter Crowell, Dersonafiy known to me (or provided to me on the basis of Satisfactory
evi(tence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknoveteoged to me t~at he/she/they executed the Same in his/her/their authorized
capacit'/(ms), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on fie instrumem the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of Which the person(s} acted, executed the insb-ument.
WITNESS my hand and officml seal.
I"""""""""'~_~'~.~"""'~
,EMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA Q DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPAN~,~C~,~ Q
BOND NUMBER
156764P
DATE OF NOTICE BOND NUMBER TYPE OF BOND
11-14-94 156764P CONST CLAS B-AL OTER CHANNEL REPAIRS
CA 92714
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter, or extend any of the terms, conditions, agreements, or
warranties of the above mentioned bond, other than stated as below.
PROJECT NO. PW94-06CSD
O
B
L
I
G
E
E
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
43180 BUSINESS PARK DR STE 200
TEMECULA CA 92590
Gentlemen:
This Rider is to be attached to and form a part of the above captioned bond e'fectiXWTy
This Rider is on behalf of TRAUTWEIN CONSTRUCTION ~~BJT
and in favor of the Obligee stated above.
consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed, effective from above date, that:
AMEND BOND NUMBER ON MAINTENANCE BOND (ONLY) FROM: 157764P
TO: 156764P
P
R
O
D
U
C
E
R
STONG MICHAEL DAVID
STONG INSURANCE AGENCY
6833 INDIANA AVE #205
RIVERSIDE CA
92506
OBUGEECOPY
Provided, however, that the liability r' 'he
company under the attached bond as c ,d
by this order shall not be cumulative.
Signed this 14 day of NOVEMBER 1994
POWER ~OF AT'$ORNEY OF
:INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
P.O. BOX 19725, IRVINE, CA 92713" (714) 263-3300
N '187130
***Dirk T. DeGraw, E. Ureno, Michael J. Hensel, Elizabeth Lem, jointly or
severally***
suretyship in an amount not excel:ling Two Mglio~ Five Hundred Thousand DOllars ($2,500,000) in any slllgla Undertaking; giving and grlnt~ng umo ~aio Attomey~sNn-r-lct lull
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OFORANGE )
On April 1, 1993, before me. T iresa Taefua, personally appeared D~nte F. Vincenti, Jr, and Walter Croweli, personally known to me (or provided to me on the basis Of
capaclt-/(ie~). and that by his/her/thstr signatures} on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) anted, executed the instrum~qL
~"""""""""'~';.:;~"""'~
Boards of Directors of Said corporations Set forth in the Power of Attorney. ate in forc~ as of the (~afo of this Certifio~te.
This CertifiCate Is !lx~cuted in the City o1 irvine, Cst~omi8, this 14~:~. day of NOV]~[~ER 199
ITEM 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
Genie Roberrs, Interim Finance Officer
November 29, 1994
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months
Ended September 30, 1994
PREPARED BY: ~'~Tim McDermott, Interim Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Combining Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1994.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the
Community Services District for the three months ended September 30, 1994. Please see the
attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1994
'E
z ~ ~
6
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY~~~bl~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
November 29, 1994
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ~¢~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DISCUSSION: A design services contract for the Parkview Fire Station Project was
approved by the Board of Directors on October 11, 1994. Staff has scheduled a one day
workshop to discuss the programming components of the fire station, levels of fire protection
and paramedic services, and recreational opportunities of the Parkview site. This workshop
will be the first step towards developing a master plan for the site and will be held on
Tuesday, November 22, 1994.
Staff has released Requests for Qualifications to solicit the design services of a Landscape
Architect for the Master Plan of the Margarita Road Park Site. Development of this 20 acre
site will provide additional active/passive park land to the City's park system. Staff will begin
the interview and negotiation process in the next 60 days. Staff anticipates that the Master
Plan will be constructed in phases. A selection committee meeting has been scheduled for
December 6, 1994. This item will be considered by the Board in January, 1995.
The Community Services Commission and the Temecula Valley Unified School District has
approved a Joint Use Agreement for Temecula Middle School. The City is proposing to
installing lighting improvements on the existing fields at Temecula Middle School. The
agreement is designed to address construction, field usage and maintenance issues. Lighting
the fields at Temecula Middle School will provide additional soccer, baseball, track, and
football playing fields which will be available for extended hours for youth sports programs.
Staff has also released Requests for Qualifications for the design services of an Electrical
Engineer. This is anticipated that this agreement and the design services contract will be
considered by the Board at the December 13, 1994 meeting.
Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II has completed construction and is currently in a 90 day
maintenance period. It is anticipated that the park will be open to the public in March, 1995.
The second phase will increase the parkland by approximately one acre and includes a tot lot,
open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation.
The contractor has begun construction on the Restroom/Snack Bar facility at Kent Hintergardt
Memorial Park. It is estimated that the construction will take approximately 90 working days
to complete (January, 1995).
Plans for Sam Hicks Monument Park is currently in second plan check. Staff met with
representatives from the museum and the design consultants to discuss construction phasing
of the various elements. The museum is hoping to begin their renovation of St. Catherine's
Church in January or February, 1995. Construction is estimated to take 90 days. The City
will solicit bids for the park improvements and begin construction after the church renovations
have been completed. The museum will also be moving forward with plan check approval and
anticipates beginning construction for the new museum facility in March, 1995.
Based on Board action of November 15, 1994, staff will bid the lighting of the Skateboard
Facility as an add alternate bid for the Sports Park Improvement Project.
The biological study for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake Project is
completed, and the report has recently been submitted to the City. The consultant and staff
will analyze the information and take the appropriate mitigation requirements into consideration
during the master planning process.
The Youth Soccer and Pop Warnet Football seasons have gone smoothly so far this year.
Staff will work diligently with these youth groups to address operational concerns end
maintenance procedures. With day-light savings time changes, Pop Warher has now moved
from Margarita Middle School to the Sports Park for practice. Eventually, this situation will
be alleviated with the lighting project at Temecula Middle School.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM i
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1994
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, October 18, 1994, 8:31 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: I
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone
Parks
Also present were Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, City Attorney Peter
Thorson, City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Authorization of Aoreement for Financial Advisory Services for the 01d Town
Entertainment Center Project
Interim Finance Officer Genie Roberts presented the staff report.
Agency Member Mu~oz asked if a variety of funding mechanisms would be
explored. Interim Finance Officer Roberts answered that under the scope of
services it states a variety of funding sources will be explored.
Agency Member Mu~oz asked how much of the consultants time would be used
attending workshops and seminars. Ms. Roberrs answered approximately 1/2 of
their time.
Agency Member Birdsall stated she feels this is a very important component of the
report. She stated she feels it is important to have consultants available at public
meetings to answer questions from the public.
RDAMINI1 O/18194 I 08~29~94
Redevelooment Aaencv Minutes October 18.1994
It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1
Approve the terms of the Agreement for Financial Advisory Services with
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates and authorize the Chairman to execute the
Agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General
Counsel as to the final form of the Agreement.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney stated a workshop is being planned to
address the Old Town Entertainment Center. She asked the City Council to check their
calendars for November 10th and November 17th, and advise the City Clerk of their
availability.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Agency Member Mu~oz stated he feels it is important to actually hold a Council/RDA
Meeting so that the public can ask questions of the Agency Members as well as staff.
Staff was directed by Agency consensus to schedule a public workshop to allow the
Agency the opportunity to review and comment on the status of activities related to the
Old Town Entertainment Center.
RDAMINI10118194 2 O8/29194
RedeveloDment Aaencv Minutes October 18, 1994
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Roberrs, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn
at 8:58 P.M. to a meeting on November 15, 1994, 8:00 PM. The motion was
unanimously carried with Chairperson Parks absent.
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
RDAMINI10118194 3 08/29194
ITEM 2
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM: Genie Robarts, Interim Finance Officer
DATE: November 29, 1994
SUBJECT: Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months
Ended September 30, 1994
PREPARED SY:~r~'/Tim McDermott, Interim Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members receive and file the Combining Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1994 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September ;30, 1994.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the
Redevelopment Agency for the three months ended September 30, 1994. Please see the
attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1994
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1994
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager 1~
\ \
November 29, 1994
Lease Amendment for Jefferson Street Property
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members authorize the General Counsel to prepare a lease amendment with
D.L. Reeves and authorize the Executive Director to execute the lease amendment.
BACKGROUND:
During 1993, the City entered into a twelve month lease with D. L. Reeves for the property
located at 27500 Jefferson Street for $20,000 per month. This lease provided for continuing
operations of the Honda Auto Dealership during the expansion of the Acura site on Ynez Road
to accommodate the Honda operation. This lease expires on January 25, 1995 and the Reeves
Group anticipates that the move will take place in January 1995.
The Reeves Group has requested a lease amendment to allow them to use the property for off-
site inventory storage at a reduced rent of $6,250 per month for twelve months. Based upon
current market conditions, it appears that the Redevelopment Agency should hold the property
and not attempt to list it at this time. Therefore, staff recommends that the Agency Members
approve the preparation of a lease amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Redevelopment Agency would receive $75,000 in rental income during the lease term.
ITEM 4
APPROVAL R~
CITYATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITYMANAGE
REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY BOARD MEMBERS
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Board Members ,~.
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ~ ~'
November 29, 1994
Adoption of AB1290 Implementation Plan
Prepared by: Marilyn Whisenand
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A FIVE YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1-1988
BACKGROUND:
AB1290, effective 1/1/94 establishes a new requirement that the Redevelopment Agency
adopt an Implementation Plan (Plan) prior to December 31, 1994 and each five years
thereafter for each redevelopment project area. The Plan requires a description of specific
programs including potential projects and estimated expenditures anticipated to be undertaken
within the redevelopment project area within the five year period of the plan, and an
explanation of how the potential projects and estimated expenditures will eliminate blight
within the project area.
The Plan must also contain, for each of the five years, an annual housing program including
a description of the number of housing units destroyed and/or removed, and the number of
units developed, substantially rehabilitated, price restricted and/or otherwise assisted. Further,
the implementation plan must describe the Agency's plans for the use of annual deposits in
the low and moderate income housing fund.
Additionally, if the implementation plan contains a project or projects for which the
Redevelopment Agency is providing financial assistance which will result in the destruction
or removal of dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income, the
implementation plan must identify proposed locations suitable for replacement housing units.
In accordance with Code Section 33490(c), the Agency must conduct a public hearing and
hear testimony of all interested parties relative to the Redevelopmerit Plan and the
implementation plan at least once within the five year term of the Plan. The hearing must take
place no earlier than two years and no later than three years after adoption of the Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of the AB1290 Implementation Plan does not bind the Redevelopment Agency
to the expenditures described in the Plan and has no direct fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution
Implementation Plan
RESOLI. rfiON NO. RDA 94.-
A RESOLUTION OF THE RFJ~EVELOPME-~ AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA ADOPTING A FIVE
YEAR IIVIPLEI~ATION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE I~v. DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1-1988
WHEREAS, on July 12, 1988, the County of Riverside, prior to the incoq~oration of
the City of Temecula, duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a Redevelopment Plan,
known as the "County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988" (hereaft~ referred to
as the "Temecula Plan");
WItEREAS, subsequent to the enactment of the Temecula Plan, the City of Temecula
was incorporated on December 1, 1989;
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9,
1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City
approved the Temecula Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Temecula Plan
and transferring jurisdiction over the Temecula Plan to the Redevelopmerit Agency of the
City of Temecula, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to City Ordinance Nos. 93-03 and 93-04,
City Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at Section 8.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal
Code;
WHEREAS, the California Legislature by Assembly Bill 1290, Statutes 1993, chapter
942 CAB 1290") and Senate Bill No. 732, Statutes 1994, chapter 936, mended the
Community Redevelopmerit Law, Health & Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. ("CRL"), to
add Health & Safety Code Section 33490 which provides that every agency shall consider
and adopt, following a public hearing, an implementation plan for each project area which
shall contain the specific goals and objectives of the agency for the project area, including
potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed to be made during the next five years
and an explanation of how the goals and objectives, programs and expenditures will eliminate
blight within the project area and implement the Agency' s low and moderate income housing
obligations;
WItEREAS, on November 29, 1994, the Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of
Temecula conducted a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with the requirements of
Health & Safety Code Section 33490 and considered the comments of the public with respect
to the proposed "Implementation Plan for Temecula Redevelopmerit Project No. 1-1988"
("Implementation Plan"); and
,~os\010 --3A--
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula,
do hereby certify that the Resolution No. RDA 94- was duly and regularly adopted
by the Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the November 29, 1994, by the following vote, to wit:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Secretary
des\010
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
FOR THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I - 1988
1989
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
II,
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
Legislative Requirements .................................
Background ..........................................
Identified Conditions of Blight .............................
Long Term Objectives of the Redevelopment Plan ................
Five Year Project Goals ..................................
Proposed Implementation Activities .........................
Relationship Between Implementation Activities
and Redevelopment Plan Findings of Blight .....................
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
XII.
XIII.
XIV.
Appendix A.
1
2
3
3
5
6
7
Inclusionan/& Replacement Housing Requirements ............... 10
Replacement Housing Requirements ......................... 14
Replacement Housing Plan ............................... 14
Housing Set-Aside Requirements ........................... 17
Long Term Housing Goals and Policies ....................... 19
Five-Year Housing Goals ................................ 21
Financial Assistance Developer Participation ................... 23
............................................. 24
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR
THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Assembly Bill 1290, also known as the Community Redevelopment Law Reform
Act of 1993, effective January 1, 1994, enacted numerous revisions to the
California Community Redevelopment Law including a requirement for the
adoption of an implementation plan. The California Community Redevelopment
Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33490 now requires that each
redevelopment agency adopt an implementation plan prior to December 31,
1994 and each five years thereafter for each redevelopment project area.
The implementation plan must contain the specific goals and objectives of the
Redevelopment Agency for each project area; the potential projects and
estimated expenditures proposed to be made during the five year period of the
plan; and, an explanation of how the goals and objectives, potential projects
and estimated expenditures will eliminate blight within the project area, and
implement the housing related requirements of Code Sections 33334.2,
33334.4, 33334.6, and 33413.
The implementation plan must contain, for each year of the five year period, an
annual housing program, including estimates of the number of housing units
destroyed and/or removed, and the number of units developed, rehabilitated,
price restricted and/or otherwise assisted. Further, the implementation plan
must describe the Agency's plans for the use of the annual deposits in the low
and moderate income housing fund during each of the next five years.
Additionally, if the implementation plan contains a project or projects for which
the Redevelopment Agency is providing financial assistance, and which will
result in the destruction or removal of dwelling units housing persons and
families of low or moderate income, the implementation plan must identify
proposed locations suitable for replacement housing units.
In accordance with Code Section 33490(c), the Agency must conduct a public
hearing and hear testimony of all interested parties relative to the
Redevelopment Plan and the implementation plan at least once within the five
year term of the Implementation Plan. The hearing must take place no earlier
than two years and no later than three years after adoption of the
implementation plan.
P:.~,EDEV/I~.OI~-~I']NO.I-I~S I
Notice of public hearings conducted regarding the adoption of the
implementation plan must be published pursuant to Code Section 6063 of the
Government Code and posted in at least four permanent places within the
project area for a period of three weeks. Publication and posting must be
completed not less than 10 days prior to the date set for hearing.
II. BACKGROUND
The Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 was adopted
by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors by Ordinance No. 658 adopted
on July 12, 1988. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1,
1989. Subsequently, on April 9, 1991, the City Council approved Ordinance
No. 91-14 activating the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
(Agency) and Ordinance No. 91-15 adopting the County of Riverside
Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988.
Project Area Description
The project area includes approximately 1,635 acres of land within four sub-
areas described on the attached maps (Attachments A-1 through A-4). Sub-
Areas Nos. 1, 2, and 3 are all located west of Interstate 15. Sub-Area No. 4
straddles Interstate 15 along Winchester and Ynez Roads.
Sub-Area Descriptions/Current Land Uses
Subarea I is located south of the Old Town area along Front Street. The
primary land uses in this sub-area are highway and locally-serving
commercial with some office and industrial uses interspersed. The area
west of Front Street is mostly vacant or is the channel of Murrieta Creek.
Subarea 2 contains the historic core of Old Town Temecula. It is
generally located between First and Sixth Streets and contains the only
residential units within the Redevelopmerit Area. The primary land uses
in the sub-area are commercial, office, and residential. The channel of
Murrieta Creek also crosses this sub-area.
Subarea 3 is located north of the Old Town core. It is generally situated
between Sixth Street and Winchester Road. The primary land uses are
commercial and industrial. Most ofthe commercial properties are located
along Front Street and Jefferson Road. The area west of Murrieta Creek
is primarily industrial. There is limited vacant land in this sub-area. The
channel of Murrieta Creek also crosses this sub-area.
Subarea 4 includes property north of Winchester Road and east of
Interstate 15. The primary land uses in this sub-area are commercial and
industrial. Most of this sub-area is currently vacant. The channel of
Murrieta Creek forms the westerly boundary of this area. Most of the
new building activity is occurring in this Sub-area.
III. IDENTIFIED CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT
The report to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors (Report) prepared in
connection with the adoption of Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988 identifies the
blighting conditions within the Project Area that the Redevelopmerit Plan is
intended to remedy. The blighting conditions that were identified in the Report
are as follows:
The age, obsolescence, deterioration, mixed character or shifting
of uses.
The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape, and
inadequate size for proper usefulness and development.
The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities,
open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or
governmental action without redevelopmerit.
A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and
social and economic maladjustment.
· The defective design in character or physical condition.
IV. LONG TERM OBJECTIVES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Project Area includes a number of conditions which are specified in the
California Community Redevelopment Law as characteristics of blight. The
objective of the Redevelopment Plan is to eliminate such conditions of blight by
providing needed public improvements, by encouraging rehabilitation and repair
of deteriorated structures, by facilitating land assembly and development which
will result in employment opportunities and an expanded tax base; and by
promoting development in accordance with applicable land use controls.
The Redevelopment Plan contains the following general objectives:
(1)
Provide a broad range of public service infrastructure improvements to
induce private investment in the Project Area. Such improvements could
include the construction or reconstruction of roads, streets, curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, the installation of street lights, the construction and
reconstruction of water storage and distribution facilities, the
Construction and reconstruction of sewage collection systems,
development of drainage and flood Control facilities, and the construction
and reconstruction of overpasses and bridges.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Where appropriate to enhance the public health, safety and welfare,
provide new or improved community facilities such as fire stations, park
and recreational facilities and other public facilities.
Promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula
following goals established for the Historic Overlay Area.
Promote the improvement and centralization of industrial areas to make
the provision of public services more efficient and to relieve development
pressure on agricultural lands.
Promote the expansion of the County's industrial and commercial bases
and local employment opportunities to provide jobs to unemployed and
underemployed workers in the County.
Assist economically depressed areas and reverse stagnant assessed
valuation trends.
Protect the health and general welfare of low and moderate-income
residents within the Project Area by utilizing 20% of tax increment
revenue to increase and improve the supply of low and moderate income
housing both inside and outside the Project Area.
Upgrade the physical appearance of the Project Area.
Encourage investment in the Project Area by the private sector.
Remove economic impediments to land assembly and in-fill development
in areas which are not properly subdivided for development.
Consolidate parcels as needed to induce new or expanded, centralized
commercial development in the Project Area.
Buffer residential neighborhoods from the intrusion of incompatible land
uses and noise.
Encourage the cooperation and participation of Project Area property
owners, public agencies and community organizations in the elimination
of blighting conditions and the promotion of new or improved
development in the Project Area.
P:~,EDEVFPROj'RCr/NO.I,I~S 4
V. SHORT TERM (FIVE YEAR) GOALS FOR THE PROJECT AREA
The priority short term goals for the Project Area are intended to guide the
City's redevelopment program from 1995 to 2000. It is anticipated that the
majority of the projects and activities undertaken by the Redevelopment Agency
(except those resulting from emergency situations) will meet these goals.
Provide a broad range of public infrastructure improvements to
induce private investment in the Project Area. This Goal will be
achieved through the design and construction of needed public
improvements (Long Term Objective 1 ).
Enhance the public safety and welfare by providing improved
community services. This goal will be achieved through the
design and construction of needed public facilities and utilities.
(Long Term Objective 2).
Promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town
Temecula, This goal will be achieved through the regulation of
land uses, the establishment of development standards and the
rehabilitation and improvement of obsolete, deteriorated, or
inappropriate buildings. (Long Term Objective 3).
Promote expansion of the industrial and commercial economic and
job bases. This goal will be achieved through the retention and
expansion of existing businesses and the encouragement of new
businesses in and around the Project Area. (Long Term Objective 5).
Preserve, improve and expand housing opportunities for low and
moderate income residents. This goal will be achieved through
the rehabilitation, repair, and replacement of currently marginal or
substandard residential units, by providing subsidies or other
support to qualified low- and moderate-income households, and
encouraging the development of new affordable housing resources
(Long Term Objective 7).
Remove economic impediments to land assembly and in-fill
development in areas which are not properly subdivided for
development through the consolidation of existing parcels to
induce or expand centralized commercial development. (Long Term
Objective 10 and 11).
VI. IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM GOALS
To achieve these short-term redevelopment goals, the City of Temecula
proposes to undertake the following blight elimination and community
improvement programs.
e
Design and construct needed public improvements. Typical examples
include, but are not limited to: the Winchester Road Interchange, the
Sixth Street Parking Area, the First Street Road Extension and Bridge, the
realignment of Felix Valdez Street, the Sixth Street Bridge, the Main
Street Bridge, the Old Town Water and Sewer Lines, the Western Bypass
Corridor, and drainage and storm water improvements.
Provide improved community services. Typical examples include,
but are not limited to: the Northwest Sports Park, the
Demonstration Block, the improvements to Sam Hicks Monument
Park, the Boys and Girls Club.
Preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula. Typical
examples include, but are not limited to projects which implement
the Old Town Specific Plan, the General Plan and Development
Code, the Demonstration Block, the Non-conforming Sign Removal
Program, the Old Town Facade Improvement Program, Old Town
Gateway Arch and Landscaping, Main Street Program, and the
Shopping Center Improvement Program.
Also proposed is the Old Town Entertainment Project, a project
which would include a 4,800 seat "Wild West" Arena, a 2,200
seat Opera House, Cabaret Theaters of 900 and 600 seats, six
Virtual Reality Theaters, a Production Studio, a "Town Square"
with outdoor entertainment.
Expand the industrial and commercial economic and job bases.
Typical examples include, but are not limited to: the Main Street
Program, the Business Assistance and Recruitment Group, the Old
Town Billboard Lease, economic development and relocation
programs, and public-private joint ventures, such as the proposed
Old Town Entertainment Project.
Improve housing opportunities for low and moderate income
residents. Typical examples include, but are not limited to: the
replacement or repair of marginal or substandard dwelling units,
providing financial subsidies to qualified low and moderate income
households, and programs that reduce land, site development
and/or construction costs for low and moderate income housing.
VII.
e
Assemble land in areas which are not properly laid out for
development. Typical examples include, but are not limited to: the
acquisition, assembly, marketing, and resale of property to support
area redevelopment activities.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES AND THE FINDINGS
OF BLIGHT
The preliminary list of redevelopmerit program activities scheduled for the next
five years are shown in Table I. The purpose of this list is to identify which
blighting condition(s) a particular project is expected to address and is not
intended as a complete or final list of needed improvements within the
Redevelopment Project Area. Most of the information and cost estimates are
based upon the 1994-1999 Capital Improvement Program and have been
rounded to the nearest thousand dollars. The costs depicted below are
estimates and are subject to change as additional information becomes available
or as local circumstances and needs change.
~ O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~I:1.,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~00~ 0
_0 t~ ,~ ~
o
F- ~.e
~ x x
I-
.5 'm~ _~ X X X
13 0
"' F- a
0 Z
"' 0
z ~ .~ x×xx xxxxx x
< _ .~.~ x
.m
r~ .o_ ~ X
o ~m
0
o & o~
m F- ~ o
n z u
o r-- o ~.~ J ~j .~. ~
VIII. INCLUSIONARY AND REPLACEMENT HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
Leoislative Reouirements
Effective January 1, 1992, AB315 required that an affordable housing plan be
prepared by each redevelopment agency that has adopted, or amended to add
land area, a redevelopment plan after December 31, 1995.
The Community Redevelopment Law Reform Act of 1993 (AB1290)
encompassed the former AB315 requirements within the requirement to adopt
an annual housing program as a part ofthe mandated implementation plan. The
implementation plan must include the number of housing units developed,
substantially rehabilitated, price-restricted, otherwise assisted, or destroyed.
The implementation plan must also describe the Agency's plans for using
annual deposits in the low and moderate income housing fund.
If the implementation plan contains a project that will result in the destruction
or removal of dwelling units that will have to be replaced pursuant to Code
Section 33413, the implementation plans shall identify proposed locations
suitable for those replacement dwelling units.
Code Section 33413 of the Community Redevelopment Law states:
(a)
Whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low or
moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and
moderate income housing market as part of a redevelopment
project which is subject to a written agreement with the Agency
or where financial assistance has been provided by the Agency,
the Agency shall, within four years of the destruction or removal,
substantially rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be
substantially rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or
sale to persons and families of low or moderate income, an equal
number of bedrooms as those destroyed or removed units at
affordable housing cost within the territorial jurisdiction of the
Agency. When dwelling units are destroyed or removed after
September 1, 1989, 75 percent of the replacement dwelling units
shall replace dwelling units available at affordable housing cost in
the same income level of very low income households, lower
income households, and persons and families of low and moderate
income, as the persons displaced from those destroyed or
removed units.
(b)
(1)
At least 30 percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated
dwelling units developed by an agency shall be available at
affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or
moderate income. Not less than 50 percent of the dwelling
units required to be available at affordable housing cost to
persons and families of low or moderate income shall be
available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by,
very low income households.
(2)
At least 15 percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated
dwelling units developed within a project area under the
jurisdiction of an agency by public or private entities or
persons other than the Agency shall be available at
affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or
moderate income. Not less than 40 percent of the dwelling
units required to be available at affordable housing cost to
persons and families of low or moderate income shall be
available at affordable housing cost to very low income
households.
Additional Inclusionarv Housinq Reauirements
On September 28, 1994, the passage of SB732 incorporated additional
requirements that call for the agency's inclusionan/housing requirements to be
met every ten years. If the requirements are not met within the applicable ten
year period, the agency must fulfill its inclusionary housing requirements on an
annual basis. Further, if the agency exceeds their inclusionary housing goals
during a given ten year period, the excess housing units can be counted
towards inclusionan/housing goals in the subsequent ten year period.
For example, if 100 new housing units are developed or substantially
rehabilitated in a project area within ten years of the initial implementation plan
by entities other than the redevelopment agency, 15 of those units must be
affordable to low and moderate income households (of which 6 must be
affordable to very low income households). If more than 15 units are
developed or substantially rehabilitated as units affordable to low and moderate
income households during this ten year period, the affordable units in excess
of 15 may be counted toward the agency's requirements for the next ten year
period. However, if fewer than 15 units are affordable to low and moderate
income households at the end of the ten-year period, the agency must meet its
production goals on an annual basis until the requirements for the ten-year
period are met.
Affordability Reauirements
Housing costs for low and moderate income housing developed pursuant to
Sections 33413 must be affordable to persons and households whose income
do not exceed 120 percent of the area family income. For purposes of the
Implementation Plan, the following income limits are used:
· Very Low Income (0-50 percent of area median family income)
· Low Income (51-80 percent of area median family income)
· Moderate Income (81-120 percent of the area median family income)
The area median family income limits are adjusted for household size, with
smaller households having lower income limits. The 1994 HUD median family
income adjusted for a four-person household in Riverside County is $42,300.
Thus by definition, 1994 maximum income is $21,150 for a very low income
four-person household, $33,840 for a low income four-person family and
$51,840 for a four-person moderate income family for jurisdictions in Riverside
County.
TABLE 2
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT - INCOME LIMITS
Ven.' Lxw.' 14800 16900 19050 21150 22850 24550 26250 27900
Income
Lower 23700 27050 30450 33850 36550 39250 41950 44650
Income
Median 29600 33850 38050 42300 45700 49050 52450 55850
Income
Moderat~ 35550 40600 45700 50750 54800 58850 62950 67000
Income
P:~P, EDEV/I~ROIECT/NO.I-II~S 12
TABLE 3
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COSTS
Income LeveiS'~ Owner COsts
Very Low (0°50%) 30% of 50% of adj. AMIm
Low 30% of 70% of sdj. AMI..
(51-70%)
Rantar Costs
30% of 50% of adj. AMI.
30% of 60% of adj. AMI.
(70-80%)
Option:
Max: 30% of gross hh inc..,
(61-80%)
Moderate
(81-120%)
Min: 28% of gross hh inc..,
Max: 35% of 110% of adj. AMI
Option:
Max: 30% of gross hh
inC.m
30% of 110% of adj. AMI.
(111-120%} Option: Option:
Max: 35% of gross hh inc.,~ Max: 30% of gross hh
inc.m
Household income (hh inc.) levels relative to area median income.
Area Median income (AMI) adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit.
Duration of AffordabilitY
Section 33413(c) says, in part, that "The agency shall require that the
aggregate number of ..dwelling units rehabilitated, developed, constructed or
price-restricted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) remain available at affordable
housing cost to persons and families of low income, moderate income, and very
low income households, respectively, for the longest feasible time, as
determined by the agency, but for not less than the period of the land use
controls established in the redevelopment plan, except... [if] a longer period of
time may be required by other provisions of law..The agency may permit sales
of owner-occupied units prior to the expiration of the period of the land use
controls established by the agency for a price in excess of that otherwise
permitted under this subdivision pursuant to an adopted program which protects
the agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund. If land on which those dwelling units are located is deleted from
the project area, the agency shall continue to require that those units remain
affordable as specified in this subdivision."
Section 33413(g) adds that "'Longest feasible time,' as used in this section,
includes, but is not limited to, unlimited duration."
Subdivisions 33413(c) and (g) ere somewhat less flexible than the general
affordability criteria for agency-assisted units set forth in Section 33334,3(f).
The latter requires that all new or substantially rehabilitated housing units
developed or otherwise assisted with monies from the low and moderate
income housing fund on or after January 1, 1988, shall remain affordable for
the longest feasible time but not less than fifteen years for rental units and ten
years for owner-occupied units. This potentially lesser standard only applies to
agency-assisted units which are not counted as contributing to the agency's
obligations under Section 33413(a) or (b).
Section 33413(b)(2)(C) adds that "long-term affordability covenants purchased
or otherwise acquired pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be required to be
maintained on dwelling units at affordable housing costs for not less than 30
years."
IX. REPLACEMENT HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
The Redevelopment Agency is required to replace low and moderate income
housing units destroyed or removed as a part of a project development with
another Low or Moderate Income Unit within four years. The Agency may
replace destroyed or removed dwellings with fewer units if the replacement
units have a greater or equal number of bedrooms and are affordable to the
same income level households. Seventy-five percent of the replacement units
shall be available at affordable housing cost to the same income level as
persons displaced.
X. THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN
Consistent with the Community Redevelopment Law and Redevelopment Plan,
this Replacement Housing Plan sets forth the City of Temecula Redevelopment
Agency's plan for the development and construction of replacement dwellings
within four (4) years following the date of destruction of affordable dwelling
units removed or destroyed in connection with certain Capitol Improvement
Projects within the redevelopment area.
The Temecula Capitol Improvement Program (CIP) currently contains three road
and bridge improvements that may result in the loss of 15 residential units. The
following table describes the projects, the number of units estimated to be
displaced and the number of bedrooms in each unit.
~.~vn, noxncr;so.~-lsss 14
TABLE 4
CIP PROJECTS
Project Description
1 st Street Bridge
Number of Units Bedroom Size
12 2
Felix Valdez/Pujol
Streets Realignment
3 3
Replacement dwelling units will be located within the boundaries of the project
area. Alternative sites for affordable housing within the project area, suitable for
projects which will provide replacement dwelling units, will be selected within four
years following the removal of the units,
The Redevelopment Agency plans to meet its replacement housing requirements
pursuant to Section 33413(a) on both an opportunity and funds available basis,
through one or more Federal, State, County or City sponsored housing programs
including without limitation the following programs:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Community Development Block Grant Program
Home Program
Section 202 Program
Redevelopment Tax Increment Funds
Redevelopment Section 108 Funds
Redevelopment Tax Credits
Density Bonus Ordinance
This portion of the Temecula Redevelopment Area Implementation Plan shall
constitute the Replacement Housing Plan as required by Section 33413.5
Existing Housina Production in Project Area
Since the adoption of the Redevelopment Ran, there have been no Agency
assisted housing units developed or substantially rehabilitated within the project
area. Nor has there been any privately developed or substantially rehabilitated
housing units constructed within the project area. Based upon this information,
the Temecula Redevelopment Agency has no current inclusionary housing
requirements.
Site Inventory
The Temecula Redevelopment Area encompasses approximately 1,757 acres of
land, of which 42 acres are currently occupied by residential uses. A total of 399
existing residential units can be found within the project area. Another 6.75 acres
are currently vacant, but have a residential land use designation.
A total of 87 new housing units may be added to the Project Area through the
development of currently vacant land. Recycling of currently occupied land would
result in a net gain of 132 units. The Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency currently
has no plans for the direct development of housing units. Given a private'
residential build out of 219 new units in the project area, future inclusionary
housing requirements are estimated at 34 units for lower and moderate income
households, of which 14 units must be affordable to very low income households.
TABLE 5
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
RESIDENTIAL SITE INVENTORY
Site Inventory
Existing Units
Development of Vacant Land
Low Medium (3-6 DU/AC)
Medium (7-12 DU/AC)
High (13-20 DUIAC)
Subtotal
Recycling of Underutilized Land
Total
Ten Year Housino Projections
Acreage
Potential Buildout
{Dwelling Units)
42.00 399
1.50 7
1.00 10
4.25 70
6.75 87
-- 132
48.75 618
The Temecuta Redevelopment Plan was adopted in July 1988 and will expire in
July, 2028. This Implementation Plan extends for the ten year period between
1994 and 2004, and establishes how the Agency intends to fulfill inclusionary
requirements for housing produced during this time frame.
Based on the estimated buildout of 219 new units over the next 33 years, a
constant pace of residential development would yield an annual housing
production of 7 units in the project area. Thus the ten year housing projection for
the Project Area would be 70 units. This rate of development would require a
total of 11 affordable units to be constructed within the Project Area during the
next ten years. Seven (7) of these units would be for low and moderate income
households and 4 units for very low income households. These ten year
P:XP,~DRV,~!tQmCTS~'OJ.~9~8 1~
projections are very general and based on economic conditions. They have been
included in the Implementation Plan as a means of gauging future residential
growth to enable the Agency to develop an appropriate strategy to fulfill
inclusionan/requirements. However, the Agency's only commitment at the end
of the ten year period is to have provided for the inclusion of Iow/mod units based
on actual development.
XI. HOUSING SET-ASIDE REQUIREMENTS
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency is required to set-aside twenty percent
(20%) of the gross annual tax increment into the low and moderate income
housing fund. The purpose of the housing set-aside fund is to produce, increase,
improve and preserve the community's supply of low and moderate income
housing. In carrying out the annual housing set-aside requirements, the Agency
may exercise any or all of its powers, including the following:
Acquire real property or building sites subject to the provisions of Code
Section 33334.16, California Community Redevelopment Law.
Improve real property or building sites with onsite or offsite improvements,
but only if the improvements directly and specifically improve or increase
the community's supply of low or moderate income housing.
· Donate real property to private or public persons or entities.
· Finance insurance premiums.
· Construct buildings or structures.
· Acquire buildings or structures.
· Substantially rehabilitate buildings or structures.
Provide subsidies to, or for the benefit of, very low-income households, as
defined by Code Section 50105, lower income households, as defined by
Code Section 50079.5 or persons and families or low or moderate income,
as defined by Code Section 50093, to the extent those households cannot
obtain housing at affordable costs on the open market, (Housing units
available on the open market are those units developed without direct
government subsidies.)
Develop plans, pay principal and interest on bonds, loans, advance, or other
indebtedness, or pay financing or carrying charges.
· Maintain the community's supply of mobile homes.
Preserve the availability to lower income households of affordable housing
units in housing developments which are assisted or subsidized by public
entities and which are threatened with imminent conversion to market
rates.
The twenty percent housing set-aside fund monies can also be used for planning
and general administrative costs, when directly related to programs and activities
associated with Code Section 33334.2(e). This includes the following activities:
Costs incurred for salaries, wages, and related costs of the Agency's staff
or for services provided through inter-agency agreements, and agreements
with contractors, including usual indirect related costs,
Costs incurred by a non-profit corporation which are not directly attributable
to a specific project.
Legal, architectural, and engineering costs and other salaries, wages, and
costs directly related to the planning and execution of a specific project
which are authorized under subdivision (3) of Code Section 33334.2 and
whichare incurred by a non-profit housing sponsor and are not planning
and administrative costs for the purpose of this section, but are, instead,
project costs.
Housing Set-Aside Fund Estimate
In order for the Agency to estimate the number of units it could develop in the
next five years, a projection of twenty percent (20%) of the tax increment revenue
was developed for the period FY 1994-95 through FY 1999-2000. These monies
would be allocated towards the preservation, development and/or substantially
rehabilitation of very low, low and moderate income housing units. It is expected
that these funds will be leveraged in concert with one of the housing programs
cited in Section XIII.
P:UtEDEV/PROi'ECT/NO.I,I~S 18
TABLE 6
PROJECTED HOUSING SET-ASIDE
Years
Estimated Twenty Percent
Tax Increment
1994-95 1,168,662
1995-96 1,192,035
199~97 1,215,876
1997-98 1,240,193
1998-99 1,264,997
1999-2000 1,290,297
Total: 7,372,060
XII. LONG TERM HOUSING GOALS AND POLICIES
The General Plan Housing Element has five separate and distinct goals developed
to address the various housing needs of the City. These are explicitly stated in
order to give latitude and authority to design and address the implementation of
the housing program. They are as follows:
Goal I
A DIVERSITY OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES THAT SATISFY THE
PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC NEEDS OF EXISTING AND
FUTURE RESIDENTS OF TEMECULA.
Policy 1.1
Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient to
accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City.
Policy 1.2
Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing
types options in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same
community by balancing jobs and housing types.
Policy 1.3
Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new
developments around the village centers to enhance their people-
orientation and diversity.
Policy 1.4 Support the use of innovative site planning and architectural design
in residential development.
Policy 1.5
Encourage the use of clustered development to preserve and enhance
important environmental resources, and maintain important areas in
open space.
P:uum~v~n4o.x-t.s 19
Policy 1.6
Goal 2
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
Goal 3
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Goal 4
Policy 4.1
Promote the development of compatible mixed use pro'~.cts that
promotes and enhances the village concept, facilitates the efficient
use of public facilities, and supports alternative transit options.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL ECONOMIC SEGMENTS OF
TEMECULA.
Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the
needs of all income levels of the population, and provides
opportunities to meet the City's fair share of low- and moderate-
income housing.
Support innovative public, private and non-profit efforts in the
development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs
groups.
Encourage the use of non-traditional housing models, including
single-room occupancy structures (SRO) end manufactured housing,
to meet the needs of special groups for affordable housing,
temporary shelter and/or transitional housing.
Pursue all available forms of private, local, state and federal
assistance to support development and implementation of the City's
housing programs.
REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS IN THE
MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING,
WHERE APPROPRIATE AND LEGALLY POSSIBLE.
Provide reasonable processing time and fees for new construction or
substantially rehabilitation of housing.
Consider mitigating development fees for projects providing
affordable and senior citizen housing.
Periodically review City development standards to ensure consistency
with the General Plan and to facilitate high-quality affordable
housing.
CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
STOCK.
Monitor and regulate, if necessary, the number of affordable units
eligible for conversion to market-rate units and develop programs to
minimize the loss of these units.
Policy 4.2 Develop rehabilitation programs that are directed at preserving the
integrity of the housing stock.
Policy 4.3
Support the efforts of private and public entities in maintaining the
affordability of units through implementation of energy conservation
and weatherization programs.
Goal 5 EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL RESIDENTS IN
TEMECULA.
Policy 5.1
Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations
prohibiting the discrimination in lending practices in the sale or rental
of housing.
Policy 5.2 Assure and support the efforts of others to ensure that unrestricted
access to housing is available to all segments of the community.
Policy 5.3 Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility
of housing for the elderly and disabled.
Policy 5.4
Encourage and consider supporting local private non-profit groups
that address the housing needs of the homeless and other
disadvantaged groups.
XIII. FIVE-YEAR HOUSING GOALS
During the five year period of the implementation plan, the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Temecula will facilitate the preservation, new construction and/or
substantial rehabilitation of affordable housing projects which will support the
following goals:
Satisfy the replacement housing requirements of community redevelopmerit
law as they relate to any housing units displaced by Redevelopment Agency
activities.
Satisfy the inclusionary housing requirements of community redevelopment
law as they relate to the provision of affordable housing and as a
percentage of new or substantially rehabilitated housing constructed within
the redevelopment project area.
· Meet the City of Temecula's fair share regional affordable housing goals.
Support overall community development, economic development, and
redevelopment/revitalization efforts within the City of Temecula.
P:u,,~Bvn~-rso.~4sss 2 1
It is anticipated that the Redevelopment Agency will couple housing set aside
funds with other public and private funding sources as described below. The
Redevelopment Agency will seek to generate the construction, substantial
rehabilitation, and/or purchase of affordability covenants through public and/or
nonprofit sponsors. The City of Temecula has no Article 34 authority and it is not
anticipated that the Redevelopment Agency or the City will directly own and
manage affordable housing projects.
Project Selection Criteria
Projects seeking financial assistance from the Redevelopment Agency's Low'and
Moderate Income Housing Fund will be evaluated on a case by case basis based
on the following criteria:
Ability of the project to generate other public/private funding in support of
housing set aside funds.
Degree to which the proposed project meets multiple community goals in
addition to affordable housing goals. These goals include but are not
limited to the following:
a. Replacement housing requirements.
b. Inclusionary housing requirements.
c. Fair share regional housing requirements.
d. Achieve community goals for redevelopment, neighborhood
revitalization and economic development.
The cost benefit of the proposed affordable housing program as defined by
the ratio of affordable housing assistance requested to number of affordable
housing units provided.
The financial track record, management and development experience of the
proposing sponsor.
Annual Targets
The number of affordable housing units to be developed over the five year
implementation plan period will depend in large part on market conditions,
availability of funding to supplement housing set aside funds and the degree to
which proposals are submitted which satisfy the stated goals and objectives.
Subject to these limiting factors, the following are the production goals for the five
year implementation plan:
TABLE 7
ANNUAL HOUSING GOALS
Year Units
1995 7
1996 7
1997 7
1998 7
1999 7
2000 7
TOTAL: 35
Limiting Factors
A number of conditions may limit the ability of the Redevelopment Agency to meet
Implementation Plan goals. Among them are the existing land uses and
socioeconomic characteristics of the project area, limited funds available from the
Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds and other funding sources, and
changing market calculations.
Reoional HousinQ Needs Plan
The Housing Element of the General Plan identified the future housing needs for the
period from July, 1988 to July, 1994. Since that time the State has suspended
funding of the mandate for The Southern California Association of Governments to
update its Regional Housing Needs Plan. Therefore no additional needs determinations
have been calculated. The annual housing projections contained in the above Ten
Year Projections and Five Year Goals will assist the fulfillment of the City's future
housing needs.
XIV. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE/DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION
The Agency's philosophy with regard to providing financial assistance in the
development of affordable housing has been to leverage low and moderate income
funds with other sources of funds. There are numerous federal, state, county or city
programs in which an agency or developer may participate. In addition, the Agency
may establish local programs to assist in the establishment and preservation of low
and moderate income housing. Apendix A, contains a brief description of these
various programs.
~u~vn~mcra~o.~-~ns 23
APPENDIX A
LIST OF FUNDING PROGRAMS
HOME ProOram
The HOME Program is a federally funded grant program for housing. Funds are
allocated by formula to participating jurisdictions who are allowed great flexibility with
respect to the types of properties to be assisted, the types of development (new
construction, modest or major rehab, etc.) to be undertaken, the forms and amounts
of financing to be offered, the Quality and type of housing provided, the households
assisted and procedures for running programs.
The intent of HOME is:
· To expand the supply of decent, safe sanitary and affordable housing.
· To strengthen the abilities of state and local governments to provide housing.
To assure that federal housing services, financing, and other investments are
provided to state and local governments in a coordinated, supportive fashion.
HOME is designed as a partnership among the federal government, sate and local
governments and those in the for-profit and non-profit sectors who build, own
manage, finance and support low income housing initiatives.
CDBG
In FY 1993/94, $206,771 in CDBG allocation and program income was available to
Temecula. Currently, the City uses CDBG funds primarily for program planning and
supportive services. Should the need arise to use these funds for affordable housing
production in the future, a portion of the City's annual CDBG allotment could
potentially be redirected.
Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
As part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Congress created the Low Income Housing
Tax Credit (LIHTC), which provides a tax shelter for limited partners in low income
housing projects. Although recently expired, this program will represent an important
financial resource for affordable housing development by the private sector.
Private Institutions
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), private lending institutions such as
banks, thrifts, and their affiliated mortgage banking subsidiaries are required to
annually assess the credit needs of the communities in which they operate. The City
has and will continue to hold meetings with lenders to discuss local needs and
potential programs that may be within the guidelines of community reinvestment.
P:',REDEV/PROIIL'~r/N0.1-1988 24
Savings Association Mortgage Company (SAMCO)
SAMCO is a statewide organization supported by stockholder savings institutions that
assists in the development and financing of socially-oriented affordable housing
projects. SAMCO's Board of Directors reviews and selects projects to be offered in
loan pools for participation purchase by its members. The pooling process has enabled
SAMCO and its members to invest additional funds in low and moderate income
communities. SAMCO has worked extensively with non-profit developers and
financed a variety of housing projects that utilize joint public/private resources.
California Community Reinvestment Corporation {CCRC)
CCRC is a non-profit mortgage banking consortium specifically designed to provide
long-term debt financing for affordable housing developments. Created in 1989, the
CCRC is comprised of fifty-six banks representing all areas of the State. The CCRC
finances loans by pooling funds from each of its member banks. CCRC has its own
staff, which screens applications and provides technical assistance to developers. A
loan committee, consisting of senior credit officers from member banks, approves all
loans on behalf of member banks. When the loan committee approves a loan, CCRC
draws funds from each bank in proportion to their size.
CCRC enters into "partnership" with cities to leverage public monies (redevelopment
low and moderate income housing funds, CDBG, etc,) with CCRC private funds
construct low and moderate income housing, Five different 30 year fixed rate Ioz
products are offered, with affordability required to be maintained for the life of
loan. Below market interest rates are provided to both non*profit and for-profit
sponsors (Treasury bonds of comparable maturities plus 100 basis points for non-
profits, plus 200 basis points for profits.)
Federal Home Loan Bank
The affordable housing programs mandated by the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989 and the Community Reinvestment
Act are now being implemented through the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks. By law,
the affordable housing provisions call for, among other things, a requirement for
interest-subsidized loans to be extended to low income homebuyers, as well as a
variety of lending activities that fall under the "community investment" heading.
The FHLB of San Francisco (Eleventh District - California, Arizona and Nevada) initiated
its Affordable housing Program in early 1990. In the first 18 months of operation, the
program provided $8.9 million in subsidies to 1,342 affordable housing units.
Subsidies ranged from $5,100 - $18,000 per single-family mortgage, to $1,200-
$17,500 per multi-family rental over the life of the loan.
Though the Affordable housing Program, the FHLB provides interest rate subsides
advances to member banks that engage intending for long-term low to modes
income owner-occupied or affordable rental housing. Loans that qualify for the
program include those used to finance homeownership by low income families, and
loans which finance the purchase, construction or rehabilitation of rental housing, of
which at least 20 percent will be occupied by very low income households.
In addition to the Affordable Housing Programs, the FHLB also implements a
Community Investment Program. Through this program, each district bank appoints
a community investment officer and provides "community-oriented" mortgage loans
to members at its own cost of funds. Loans that qualift/for the program include those
used to finance the purchase or rehabilitation of homes by borrowers earning 115%
or less of the are median income, and those that finance commercial or economic
development projects that benefit low and moderate income families.
Deed-Restrict Existing Projects
The City has numerous multi-family projects in the Project Area that are currently
occupied by lower income tenants. The City/Agency may negotiate deed restrictions
with owners of these existing projects to restrict rental rates to levels affordable to
lower income households. Low and moderate income housing funds for rehabilitation
of the buildings may be offered as an incentive in exchange for deed restrictions.
Assistance to the existing. rental stock should be publicly advertised to solicit
applications from existing owners.
Extend Existing Deed Restrictions
The City has two multi-family projects in the Project Area that assist lower income
tenants. Each project has 48 assisted units. Creekside, a senior apartment complex
receives assistance from the FMHA, New Construction Section 15, and is not eligible
to convert until August 27, 2037. However, Temecula Villas, which receives Section
8, New Construction assistance is eligible to convert on January 29, 1995. The
Agency will work with the owners of the Temecula Villas to provide incentives to
extend this deed restriction 33 years, to the life of the Redevelopment Plan.
Conversion of Commercial Develooment to Mixed-Use Development
The City of Temecula's General Plan and Old Town Specific Plan both contains policies
that encourage the use of Mixed-Use development. Within the project Area and
particularly within Old Town these policies could facilitate the conversion of second
and third story office/retail space to affordable units. Low and moderate income
housing funds for rehabilitation of the space may be offered as an incentive for
conversion to affordable units, As part of the funding assistance the City/Agency
should consider placing deed restrictions on these converted units to ensure unit
affordability.
1,:u~Dsvr~orsc-rtso.l.~ss 26
Subsidized New Construction/Purchase of Existing Housing
New construction of rental housing for lower income households traditionary
represents one of the Agency's primary options to fulfill its inclusionan/housing
production requirements. The gap between market rents and rents affordable to very
low and low income households, typically require subsidies to achieve affordability.
The amount of subsidy required depends on the type and size of housing to be
developed. Given the current availability of housing products at costs below
replacement costs, purchase of existing housing presents a more cost effective option.
Substantial Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of existing rental properties is a cost-effective program option to fulfill
the Agency's affordable housing production requirements. The Agency may use
redevelopmerit low and moderate income housing funds to provide financial assistance
for the rehabilitation of private non-profit and for-profit rental properties. The
City/Agency will study the cost effectiveness of establishing its own rehabilitation
program. As an option the City/Agency may wish to contract with the Riverside
County Economic Development Agency to carry out a rehabilitation program.
Currently, this Agency operates a home improvement loan program, a senior home
repair program and is about to re-establish rental rehabilitation program. These
programs are available to people residing within Temecula.
Mobilehome Park Assistance Proorem
Currently, a single mobile home park exists in the City. The City may develop a
program using redevelopment low and moderate income housing funds to assist lower
and moderate income mobilehome park tenants in stabilizing their rents. This may
result in the conversion of a perk to Tenant-owned. A City program should be in
conjunction with the State Mobilehome Park Conversion Assistance Program.
Affordability controls on mobilehome parks can be achieved through different
approaches:
The City may assist tenant purchase of individual spaces. Permanent financing
of lots may be provided through conventional financing, the State's Mobilehome
Resident Ownership Program, redevelopment low and moderate income housing
funds, and other public/private subsidies for lower income households,
The City may provide technical assistance in the formation of a tenant
association, which will then purchase the park with financial assistance from
the City, State, or other sources. In return, the association will be required to
either maintain the existing income mix of tenants or through time, restrict the
renting of spaces to lower income tenants.
2'7
In order to count mobilehome parks towards fulfillment of very low income
inclusionary production requirements, space rents would need to be deed-restricted
for the life of the Redevelopment Project, and restricted to occupancy by very low
income households.
First-Time Homebuyers Program
The First-Time Homebuyers Program (FTHB) is a down payment assistance program
for low and very low income homebuyers. Qualified buyers are eligible to receive up
to $20,000 is assistance for the purchase of a primary residence. HUD requires that
buyers participating in the program agree to an affordability period of 20 year for new
construction and 15 years for all other property. If the property is sold prior to the
end of the affordability period, and the purchaser is not eligible for the program, the
assistance funds must be repaid, and the County shares in the equity with the seller.
The funds are returned to the program to provide assistance to new participants. The
program can also be structured as an interest rate buy-down program.
Mortgage Credit Certificate Prooram
The Mortgage Credit Certificate Program (MCC) is available for first-time homebuyers
who have not had an ownership interest in a principal residence within the previous
three years. Buyers interested in participating in the program make application
through their lender at the time they apply for a home loan. The MCC provides a tax
credit which allows the borrower to qualify for a larger mortgage. This tax credit is
calculated a 20% of the annual interest paid on the primary mortgage, and can be no
greater than $2,000 per year.
Sinelie Family MortpaQe Revenue Bond Program
The County coordinates interested lenders and developers who wish to participate in
a single family tax exempt bond program. The County issues tax exempt bonds to
generate a pool of funds from which mortgages will be drawn. The developers and/or
lenders pay the up front costs for the financing and reserve a portion of the pool to
originate mortgages in their projects. The individuals purchasing the homes must be
first time homebuyers and fall within certain income parameters. Ultimately, the first
time homebuyer can qualify for a larger mortgage because the interest rate is lower
than market rate. The developer/lender can use the mortgage pool to more effectively
market their homes.
Multi-Family Bond Program
The Multi-Family Bond Program provides long term financing for multi-family projects
at tax exempt rates. The program requires that 20% of the units be reserved for low
and moderate income residents. Project owners are required to provide a letter of
credit, insurance or other credit, insurance or other credit enhancement for the
financing.
P:L~/.DEV/PROIIL"~T~0.1-1~S 28
ATTACHMENT A-1
MAP OF SUB-AREA I
p:L,~EDSVrPRO~CrS0.X-I~SS 29
RANCHO TEMECULA
Subarea 1: Zoning Map
R- 1: Single Family Residential
R-2: Multiple Family Residential
R-3: General Residential
R-R: Rural Residential
C-1: Generll Commercial
C-P: Restricted Commercial
C-P-S: Scenic Highway Comm
__ M-M: Manufacturing Medium
M-SC: Manufacturing Service Comm
I-P: Restricted Industrial
A-2-20: Heavy Agriculture
" ' 20 Acre Man, Lot Area
__ W-l: Watercourse, Watershed
' and Conservation Areas
,.,/
C-P-S
A'I'I'ACHMENT A-2
MAP OF SUB-AREA 2
P:~,.EDEV/PRO/ECTIN0.1-19~$ 30
RANCHO TEMECULA
Subarea 2: Zoning
R-l: Single Family Residential
R-2: MultiDie Family Residential
R-3: General Residential
R-R: Rural Residential
C-1: General Commercial
C-P: Restricted Commercial
C-P-S: Scenic Highway Comm
M-M: Manufacturing Medium
M-SC: Manufacturing Service Comm
I-P: Restricted Industrial
A-2-20: Heavy Agriculture
20 Acre Man. Lot Area
W-l: Watercourse, WaterShed
' and Conservation Areas
ATTACHMENT A-3
MAP OF SUB AREA 3
p: ~DSV/PRQIF, CT/N0.1 - 1988 ~ 1
RANCHO TEMECULA
Subarea3: Zoning Map
[~R-1; Single Flmlly Rellcienliil
R-2; MultiDie Family Reliclenfi81
R-3: Generll Relldentlal
'R-R; Rural Resldenliil
~']C-1: General Commercial
C-P: Restricted Commercial
C-P-S; SCenic Highway Coma
~M-l~h Manufacturing Iviedlure
I-P: RestriCted Inclustrlal
A-2-20: Heavy Agriculture
Acre Min. Lot Area
~'~ ~,aliforniq' R=
/
ATTACHMENT A-4
MAP OF SUB-AREA 4
~:u~ssvr~orscrrNo.x-x.s 32
TEMECULA
Subarea 4: Zoning Map
R-l: Single Family Residential
R-2: Multiple Family Residential
R-3: General Residential
R-R: Rural Residential
C-1: General Commercial
C-P: Restricted Commercial
C-P-S: Scenic Highway Comm
M-M: Manufacturing Medium
M-SC: Manufacturing Service Comm
I-P: Restricted Industrial
A-2-20: Heavy Agriculture
. .. 20 Acre Man. Lot Area
__ W-l: Watercourse, Watershed
and Conservation Areas
\',,/
/~ \\,