Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout020392 PC Agenda AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 3, 1992 6:00 PM VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 29915 Mira Loma Drive Temecula, CA 92390 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hoagland ROLL CALL: Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers, COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Minutes 2.2 Approval of minutes of January 27, 1992 Planning Commission Meeting. Not to be approved until meeting of February 24. NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Location: Case Planner: Recommendation: Substantial Conformance No. 21 Mike Padberg To construct an ATM kiosk in the parking lot of an existing commercial center. Northeast corner of Front Street and Moreno Road. Mark Rhoades Approval PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Case Planner: Recommendation: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Case Planner: Recommendation: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Case Planner: Recommendation: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 Weepark Industrial, Ltd. 43218, 43234, 43250, 43264, 43280 Business Perk Drive Request to subdivide 6.37 acres into 5 lots at an existing Industrial Park Mark Rhoades Approval Tentative Parcel Map 27232 Palmilia Plaza Joint Venture Northwest corner of Lyndia Lane and Rancho California Road Application to subdivide 6.31 acres into 3 parcels on Plot Plan No. 18, approved. Mark Rhoades Approval Parcel Map No. 27239 Koll Business Center/Rancho California Limited Partnership Westerly of Ynez Road and Northerly of Winchester Road. Subdivide 13.94 acres into six (6) parcels. Matthew Fagan Approval Case No.: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Presenter: Amendment of Ordinance 90-19 City of Temecuia Planning Department City of Temecula City Boundaries The City of Temecula proposes to amend Ordinance 90-19 which established decision making authority for sub-division and land use applications. Gary Thornhill, Planning Director Ordinance to be under separate cover. Next meeting: February 24, 1992, 6:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Planning Director RePort Planning Commission Discussion Other Business ADJOURNMENT IbpclAGN213192 2 ITEM # 3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1992 Case No.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 Prepared By: Mark A. Rhoades LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: DIRECT Staff to issue a letter of Substantial Conformance in accordance with Exhibit "A" of the attachment, and to include wood frame mullions in place of aluminum on the sunscreen. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: San Diego Trust and Savings Bank REPRESENTATIVE: Mike Padberg PROPOSAL: To construct an automatic teller machine KIOSK in the parking lot of Old Towne Plaza. Southeast corner of Front Street and Moreno Road. C-1 (General Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: N/A Retail Center C-1/C-P (General Commercial) C-1/C-P (General Commercial) R-3 (General Residential) C-1/C-P (General Commercial) North: Post Office South: Commercial East: Fire Station West: Vacant PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed application is a request to construct an eighty-four (84) square foot freestanding automatic teller machine (ATM) KIOSK. The ATM will be located on the westerly portion of the existing parking lot at the Old Towne Plaza. The structure has been designed to reflect the colors and materials at the existing center. ANALYSIS The proposed ATM machine will be constructed over two existing parking spaces. Based on the retail parking calculation for the center, the removal of the two spaces will not reduce the re~luired spaces needed for the center below the standards of Ordinance No. 348. No landscaping will be removed. The impact of the ATM machine on existing parking and circulation is not considered significant. The relatively transient nature of ATM customers dictates that impacts to adjacent parking spaces will be very short term. The KIOSK is oriented toward Front Street in order to provide security in the form of visibility for potential customers: The project has been reviewed by the Old Town Temecula Historical Committee because of the proximity of the site to Old Town. That committee has accepted the proposed design, with the addition of wood mullions, instead of aluminum, on the proposed sunscreen. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: DIRECT Staff to issue a letter of Substantial Conformance in accordance with Exhibit "A" of the attachment, and to include wood frame mullions in place of aluminum on the sunscreen. vgw Attachments: 1. Exhibits, page 3 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBITS CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 VICINITY MAP CITY OF TEMECULA SWAP (Exhibit B) Designation: C ZONING (Exhibit C) Case No.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 P.C. Date: February 21, 1992 Designation: C-1/C-P CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 EXHIBIT: D SURROUNDING LAND USE MAP P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 CITY OF TEMECULA I'kl II O , SHOPPING CENTER PLAN AT~ KIOSK LOCATION N .T.S. CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: E P.C. DATE: Substantial Conformsnce February 3, 1992 SITE PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 EXHIBIT: F P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 ELEVATIONS CITY OF TEMECULA I CASE NO.: Substantial Conformance No. 21 EXHIBIT: G P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 PARKING LOT ITEM # 4 RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1992 Case No.: Tentative Parcel Mal~ No. 27198 Prepared By: Mark A. Rhoades The Planning Department Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission: REAFFIRM Environmental Assessment No. 33338 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 and; ADOPT Resolution 92-__ al~proving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Wespark Industrial, LTD. REPRESENTATIVE: Engineering Ventures PROPOSAL: Request to subdivide a 6.0 acre parcel into 5 industrial parcels at an existing industrial office complex. 43218, 43234, 43250, 43264, and 43280 Business Park, Drive. M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: N/A M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) Industrial Office Buildings North: South: East: West: Industrial Office Complex Industrial Office Complex Offices/Vacant Vacant S\STAFFRPT%27198.TRVI PROJECT STATISTICS Gross Acres: Proposed Parcels: Parcel sizes: 6.0 5 Parcel No. 1 Parcel No. 2 Parcel No. 3 Parcel No. 4 Parcel No. 5 1.0 gross acres 1.2 gross acres 1.5 gross acres 1.2 gross acres 1.0 gross acres Minimum Parcel Size: 1.0 gross acre BACKGROUND Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 was submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department on August 28, 1991. The project was taken to a Development Review Committee meeting on September 26, 1991 where additional information was requested relative to CC&Rs, landscape maintenance and the map configuration. The requested information was submitted at the end of October. At that time, Staff began generating conditions of approval and the initial study. The project was deemed complete in November, and subsequently scheduled for public hearing. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 is an application to subdivide six (6) gross acres into five (5) parcels in the M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) zone. The proposed project is located on the east side of Business Park Drive and north of Single Oak Drive, and one parcel south of City Hall. The project is located within an existing industrial park. This site is surrounded on three sides by existing industrial development. The proposed parcel map site is currently under construction. The underlying Plot Plan No. 10909 was approved by the County of Riverside with five industrial buildings. The parcels proposed are configured to provide a separate lot for each building. ANALYSIS Site Analysis The proposed parcel map is located within an existing industrial park. Five buildings are currently being constructed on site and are nearly completed. As a result of development, the site is nearly flat with drainage to the south and east. The parcel map proposes to divide the site into five parcels. Each parcel will contain one building. A twenty foot wide landscape easement will buffer the site from Business Park Drive to the west. Surroundino Land Uses As previously mentioned the site is within an existing industrial park. To the northwest, north and northeast of the proposed site are existing industrial and industrial office uses. The parcels to the east and to the south also support industrial and industrial office uses. The parcels to the southeast and west of the site are currently vacant. Parkino/Circulation Under the proposed tentative parcel map all parcels would retain the reciprocal access approved under Plot Plan No. 10909, The project will be required to record CC&R's for the parcel map to ensure access/parking and landscape maintenance. Each parcel contains adequate parking for industrial use as defined in Ordinance No.348, Section 18.16. The project proposes to take access from Business Park Drive. Business Park Drive is currently improved and provides access for the Rancho California Business Park. ZONING, SWAP AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The project site is zoned M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial), and all of the adjacent parcels are also zoned M-SC. The proposed tentative parcel map is in conformance with the requirements of the M-SC zone. The proposed project and previously approved plot plan conform with all of the pertinent standards of Ordinance Nos. 460 and 348. This project is located within an existing industrial park. The current SWAP designation is LI, Light Industrial. The existing area and site development support industrial or proposed industrial projects. It is very likely that the future General Plan will reflect a land use that is consistent with area development. If the proposed project is not consistent with the future adopted General Plan, it will not pose a substantial detriment because the proposed project is consistent with area development. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Environmental Assessment was completed for this site in conjunction with Plot Plan No. 10909. At that time, environmental issues were mitigated for the project which is currently under construction. The proposed Tentative Map does not indicate any new construction, however, the project is subject to CEQA because of the number of parcels proposed. Staff is therefore recommending that the Planning Commission re-affirm the Negative Declaration for the underlying Plot Plan. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with all relevant City Ordinances and State laws. The project proposes a lot configuration which is a logical division of the improved site, and which is likely to be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan. No new environmental impacts have been identified and the project has been adequately conditioned to assure conformance with appropriate City and State standards, policies, and Ordinances. FINDINGS The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not have a significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the project. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time because the current SWAP designation is Industrial, There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with SWAP, as well as Ordinances Nos. 348 and 460 and because the project is consistent with adjacent development. The proposed use complies with State Planning and Zoning Law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance 460, Schedule E. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Map showing access to Business Park Drive. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 10. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. S~STAFFRPT~.7198.TPM 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission: REAFFIRM Environmental Assessment No. 33338 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 and; ADOPT Resolution 92-__ approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. vgw Attachments: Resolution page 6 Condition of Approval - page 11 Exhibits - page 17 S~STAFFRPT~27198.TR~ 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-__ S\STAFFRPT~7198.TN 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27198 TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.0 ACRE PARCEL INTO 5 PARCELS ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SOUTHERLY OF SINGLE OAK DRIVE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-020-054. WHEREAS, WesPark Industrial, LTD., filed Parcel Map No. 27198 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Tentative Parcel Map on February 3, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved said Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30omonth period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (1) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. 7 (2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (3) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. The Planning Commission finds, in approving of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (1) There is reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time due to the current SWAP designation of LI (Light Industrial). (2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan because the project is surrounded by industrial development. (3) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, the project is consistent with Ordinance Nos. 460 and 348. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not have a significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the project. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time because the current SWAP designation is Industrial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with SWAP, as well as Ordinances Nos. 348 and 460 and because the project is consistent with adjacent development. The proposed use complies with State Planning and Zoning Law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance 460, Schedule E. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of- ways which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Map showing access to Business Park Drive. S\STAFFRPT~7198.TFfVl 9 The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION III, the Tentative Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION II. Environmental Compliance. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration No. 33338 for Plot Plan No. 10909) still applies to said tentative parcel map. SECTION III. Conditions. 1. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. SECTION IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1992. JOHN E. HOAGLAND CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of February, 1992 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ASSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S\$TAFFRP'r~.71H.Tm 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 Project Description: A 5 parcel industrial subdivision on 6.37 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-020-054 Planning Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated September 24, 1991 a copy of which is attached. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Manufacturing Service Commercial. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. 8%STAFFRPT%2?ISB*TI=~4 12 10. 11. A. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan". 2. "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Parcel Map No. 27198 which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground, with easements provided as required. No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. $\STAFFRPT~271Sa. TPM 13 12. 13. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. Within forty-eight {48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars (1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars (~ 1250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). Building and Safety Department 14. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide information to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that building setbacks and exterior wall construction comply with the provisions of table 5A, 1988 Uniform Building Code for proximity to property line. Public Works Department The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and thei~ omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 15. Prior to recordation of the final map, subdivider must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. If State processing of the permit cannot be completed due to lack of proper forms from SWTCB, subdivider shall execute an agreement with the City to obtain the NPDES permit as soon as the appropriate application forms are available and as directed by the Department of Public Works. 16. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. S~TAFFRFT~2719e.TPM 14 17. 18. 19. 20. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; General Telephone; and Southern California Edison, All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Business Park Drive and so noted on the final map with the exception of access points as approved by the Department of Public Works and shown on the Tentative Map, A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following Engineering conditions: A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. ~STA~PT~7~SS.~ 15 The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 1. The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or numbered lots. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 21. Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CA'IV Standards and as prescribed by the City of Temecula Ordinance 90-12. 22. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be 92.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Transportation Engineering PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 23. Subdivider shall execute an agreement with the City of Temecula to contribute a fair share portion of the total construction costs for traffic signals at the following percentages: 7% for the traffic signal at Vincent Moraga Drive and Rancho California Road; 17% for the traffic signal at Ridge park Drive and Rancho California Road. S~STAFFI~oT~27198.TRd 16 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS S'~STAFFRPT~2719B.TN 17 CITY OF TEMECULA Pork Dr ~/~ D~-IU0 UI ~ O ~-A(.~ .5'o, qhbclo ,qd. CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 February 3, 1992 VICINITY MAP S~STAFFRPT~27198.TPM CITY OF TEMECULA SWAP (Exhibit B) Designation:L]: RA-20.?~, / ~,\\~, / / ZONING (Exhibit C) '~,ase No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 J.C. Date: February 3, 1992 Designation:kI-SC CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 EXHIBIT: D SURROUNDING LAND USE MAP P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 S\STAFFRP~27198,TPM CITY OF TEMECULA I CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 EXHIBIT: E P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 SITE PLAN S\STAFFRPT~27198.~ ITEM STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1992 Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 Prepared By: Mark Rhoades RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission: REAFFIRM the Environmental Assessment completed for Plot Plan No. 18, Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232, and; ADOPT Resolution 92-__ approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Palmilia Plaza Joint Venture REPRESENTATIVE: Webb, Hawkins, and Associates PROPOSAL: Request to subdivide 6.31 acres into 3 parcels over approved Plot Plan No. 18. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road. EXISTING ZONING: C-1/C-P (General Commercial) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: R-3-4,000 (General Residential, 4,000 sq. ft./unit) R-3-4,000 (General Residential, 4,000 sq. ft./unit) C-1/C-P (General Commercial) C-1/C-P (General Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: N/A EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Apartments/Offices Vacant Retail Center/Residential Retail Center PROJECT STATISTICS Gross Acres: 6.31 Proposed Parcels: 3 BACKGROUND Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 was submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department on October 4, 1991. The project was taken to a Development Review Committee meeting on November 7, 1991 where additional information was requested. Staff had requested a copy of Plot Plan No. 18 showing the proposed parcel lines. The requested information was submitted in December. At that time, Staff began generating conditions of approval and the Initial Study. The project was deemed complete at the end of December, and subsequently scheduled for public hearing. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 is an application to subdivide 6.31 gross acres into three (3) parcels in the C-1/C-P (General Commercial) zone. The proposed project is located on the of Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road. The proposed parcel map overlays an approved commercial plot plan. The underlying Plot Plan No. 18 was approved by the City of Temecula in 1991 with 47,400 square feet of commercial space. The parcels proposed are configured to provide separate lots for the 3 separate building groups of the approved plot plan. ANALYSIS Site Analysis The proposed parcel map is located between two existing commercial centers, Moraga Plaza to the east and Rancho California Town Center to the west. Three buildings were approved with the plot plan, two individual structures, and one containing retail shop space. The parcel map proposes to divide the site into three parcels. Each parcel will contain one building. A variable 15-20 foot wide landscape setback will buffer the site from Rancho California Road to the south. Surrounding Land Uses The proposed project site currently lies between two existing retail centers. Moraga Plaza is to the east and the Rancho California Town Center is to the west. The area to the south of the site is vacant. To the north of the site is vacant land, offices and apartments. ParkinQ/Circulation Under the proposed tentative parcel map all parcels would retain the reciprocal access approved under Plot Plan No. 18 The project will be required to record C.C. and R.'s for the parcel map to ensure access/parking and landscape maintenance. Each parcel contains adequate parking for the approved uses as defined in Ordinance No.348, Section 18.16. S~STAFFRPT~27232,TPM 2 The project proposes to take access from Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane. Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane are currently improved. ZONING, SWAP AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY The project site is zoned C-1/C-P (General Commercial). The adjacent parcels to the east and west are also zoned C-1/C-P. The proposed tentative Parcel Map is in conformance with the requirements of the C-1/C-P zone. The proposed project and previously approved plot plan conform with all of the pertinent development standards of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460. This project is located along an existing commercial corridor. The current SWAP designation is C, Commercial. The existing area supports existing commercial as well as proposed commercial projects. It is very likely that the future General Plan will reflect a land use that is consistent with area development. If the proposed project is not consistent with the future adopted General Plan, it will not pose a substantial detriment because the proposed project is consistent with area development. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Environmental Assessment was completed for this site in conjunction with Plot Plan No. 18 At that time, environmental issues were mitigated for the project which is currently approved. The proposed Tentative Map does not indicate any new construction and Staff is therefore recommending that the Planning Commission re-affirm the Negative Declaration for the underlying Plot Plan. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with all relevant City Ordinances and State laws. The project proposes a lot configuration which is a logical division of the approved site plan, and which is likely to be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan. No new environmental impacts have been identified and the project has been adequately conditioned to assure conformance with appropriate City and State standards, policies, and Ordinances. FINDINGS The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not have a significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the project. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Plan being prepared at this time because the current SWAP designation is Commercial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with SWAP, as well as Ordinances Nos. 348 and 460 and because the project is consistent with adjacent development. The proposed use complies with State Planning and Zoning Law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance 460, Schedule E. 5. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Map showing access to Rancho California Road and to Lyndie Lane. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 10. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission: REAFFIRM the Environmental Assessment completed for Plot Plan No. 18, Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232, and; ADOPT Resolution 92-__ approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. vgw Attachments: Resolution - page 5 Conditions of Approval - page 10 Exhibits - page 21 S\STAFFRPT%27232 .TFfd 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-__ S'~STAFFRPT~.7232.TN 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 27232 TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.31 ACRE PARCEL INTO 3 PARCELS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LYNDIE LANE AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-310-011 AND 921-320-023. WHEREAS, Palmilia Plaza Joint Venture, filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Tentative Parcel Map on February 3, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved said Tentative Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISS ION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (1) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. S%STAFFRFT%27232 .TPM 6 (2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (3) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. The Planning Commission finds, in approving of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (1) There is reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 proposed wilt be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, because the project is consistent with the SWAP designation of Commercial. (2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, because the project is adjacent to existing commercial development, (3) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances because it is in conformance with Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. 7 That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not have a significant negative impact on the environment, as determined in the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the project. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the General Ran being prepared at this time because the current SWAP designation is Commercial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the future adopted General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with SWAP, as well as Ordinances Nos. 348 and 460. The proposed use complies with State Planning and Zoning Law. The project conforms to the current zoning for the site and to Ordinance 460, Schedule E. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configurations, access, and density. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the State Map Act in regard to future passive energy control opportunities. All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of- ways which are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION II. Environmental Compliance. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 18) still applies to said Tentative Parcel Map. SECTION III. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 for the subdivision of a 6.31 acre parcel into 3 parcels located on the northwest corner of Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 921-310- 011 and 921-320-023 subject to the following conditions: 1. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. SECTION IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1992. JOHN E. HOAGLAND CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of February, 1992 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS S\STAFFRFT~27232,TPM 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S~STAFFRF'r~.7232,TN 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No. 27232 Project Description: A 3 parcel commercial subdivision on 6.31 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-310-011,921-320-023 Planning Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is 6. 7. 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated November 13, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water District transmittal dated November 14, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Fire Department transmittal dated November 5, 1991 a copy of which is attached. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the General Commercial zone. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. S%STAFFRPT',2'7232,TI~q 1 I 10. 11. 12. 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be I~ermanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This prol~erty is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan". B. "Drainage easements shall be left free of buildup and obstructions." Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Parcel Map No. 27232 which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground, with easements provided as required. No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of $~TAFFRPT~27232.TPM 12 assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 14. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. 15. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ( 1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars (~ 1250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty Five Dollar (925,00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). 16. Parcel Map No. 27232 will need to comply with any and all conditions of underlying Plot Plan No. 18. Public Works Department The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 17. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. 18. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; S',STAFFBFT',27232 .TN 13 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Department of Public Work. s; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and Parks and Recreation Department. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. The eastbound to northbound left turn pocket on Rancho California for Lyndie Lane shall be designed and constructed to provide a 120 foot transition and 200 feet of storage capacity. The centerline of the driveway access from Lyndie Lane shall be 285 +/- feet from the centerline of Rancho California Road. The developer shall design and construct half width street improvements including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, center median and asphaltic concrete paving for the south side of Rancho California Road west of Lyndie Lane from existing improvements easterly through the intersection, providing an adequate transition to match existing improvements as approved by the City Engineer. Rancho California Road shall be improved in accordance with City Standard No. 100, (86'/110'). In the event that the improvements on the south side of Rancho California Road from existing curb and gutter easterly through the intersection with Lyndie Lane are not already constructed by the Margarita Villages Benefit District prior to occupancy, the developer shall construct these required off-site improvements on Rancho California Road as approved by the City Engineer. The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the full cost of the design and construction of these road improvements. Lyndie Lane shall be improved with 28 feet of half street improvement plus one 8' lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within a 78' dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 110, (56'/78'). In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Rancho California Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of one driveway entry point as approved by the Department of Public Works. 27. Corner property line cut off shall be required per City Standard No. 402. S~'STAFFRPT~27232*TFM 14 28. 29. 30. 31. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. A reciprocal access agreement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following Engineering conditions: A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all parking lot, landscape, drainage and related facilities. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. S\STAFFRP~27232.TI~I 15 2. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 32. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. A. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. B. Storm drain facilities. C. Landscaping (street and parks). D. Sewer and domestic water systems. E. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. 33. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. 34. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the requirements of City Standards 461 and as approved by the Department of Public Works. 35. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 36. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. 37. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Department of Public Works. 38. A minimum flowline grade shall be 0.50 percent. 39. Improvement plans per City Standards for the development of each parcel shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. 40. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 208 and 401 (curb sidewalk). S\STAFFRPT~27232,TPM 16 41. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted as directed by the Department of Public Works at the time of application for grading plan check. 42. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Department of Public Works. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 43. A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. This study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed conditions, including hydrology and hydraulic calculations. The drainage study shall also address the capacity of existing downstream systems within Parcel Map No. 23687, and a secondary overland drainage escape route. Provide a letter from the property owner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 23687 that they will accept the proposed drainage into their property or provide a storm drain system along the northeast property line that will discharge the site drainage onto Lyndie Lane. 45. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 46. As determined from the drainage study, the developer shall construct or enlarge offsite drainage facilities to mitigate any increase or diversion of existing flows from the project site into adjacent downstream properties. Adequate drainage easements shall be secured if needed. Mitigation shall be as directed by the City Engineer. 47. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will be required along the northwesterly property line to protect downstream properties by diverting sheet runoff to Lyndie Lane, or to a storm drain. 48.' Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 49. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until a NPDES permit is granted or the project is shown to be exempt. 50. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 51. Prior to any work being performed on the site, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. S%$TAFFRPT%27232.TPfA 17 52. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 53. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters have been obtained, and approval of the grading plan has been granted by the Department of Public works. 54. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April inclusive, erosion control and runoff mitigation plans will be required. All plans shall be submitted with appropriate notes as directed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 55. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within their right- of-way. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 56. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 57. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 58. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 59. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to traffic signal, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. $',STAFF~7232.TPIVl 18 60. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Traffic control plans shall be provided as directed by the Department of Public Works, and may be required to be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. 61. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than 14 days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Transportation Engineering PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 62. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by e registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans. 63. The developer shall design the signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane and may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City to distribute the total cost of this signal between Plot Plan No. 18, Plot Plan No. 228, Plot Plan No. 240, and from the future development of the 6.12 acre parcel to the south of this intersection. A focused traffic analysis shall be prepared by the subdivider, and approved by the Department of Public Works, utilizing previously compiled traffic study data. 64. Traffic signal interconnection shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer to show I 1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200 foot centers along Rancho California Road. This design shall be shown on the street improvement plans and must be approved by the Department of Public Works. 65. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. 66. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the Department of Public Works. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: 67. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 68. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 69. The traffic signal shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. S\STAFFRPT%27232,TPI~ I 9 70. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan. 71. Provide limited landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance. S~'~TAFFRPT~27232,Tm 20 FROM: RE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF 'r~d~ECULA DATE: A ark P, hoades v nt Health Specialist IV ironme 11-13-91 The Environmental Health Services Division has reviewed the Parcel Map No. 27232, for this project and cannot make any recommendations until a sanitation letter is filed. The requirements for a SAN 53 letter are as follows: 1. A satisfactory soils percolation test to prove the project feasible. A clearance letter from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board. NOTE: For projects within the San Diego Water Quality Control Board sphere of influence, a written clearance shall be required prior to issuance of a SAN 53. 3. Two copies of the Parcel Map. 4. A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water. Should the project be served sanitary sewer services, this Department would need only: A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water and sanitary sewers. 2. One copy of the Tentative Parcel Map. If the project is to be served water by existing wells, pumps and water tanks, a water supply permit will be required (contact the EHSD, Engineering Section at 275-8980). The requirements for a water supply permit are as follows: City of Temecula Page Two Attn: Mark Rhoades November 13, 1991 Satisfactory laboratory tests (bacteriological, organic. inorganic, general physical, and general mineral) to prove the water potable. A complete set of plans showing all details of the proposed and existing water systems: sizes and types of pipe and calculations showing that adequate quantity and pressure can be maintained (California Waterworks Standards - California Health and Safety Code and California administrative Code, Title 22). These plans must be signed by a registered civic engineer. SM:dr November 14, 1991 Mr. Mark Rhoades City of Temecula Planning Department 43180 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SUBJECT: Water Availability .~ Map 27232 Dear Mr. Rhoades: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWDo If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICI' Steve Brannon, P. E. Manager of Development Engineering SB:SD:ajw217 ,,,J,,,, RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTlVrw-NT 210 WEST SAN' .1ACINTO AVENUE 0 PERRI$. CALIFORNIA CT]A) 657-31~3 Ot~N 3. NI~VMAN N~v,mber 5, 1991 The Riverside Count}' Fire Department has no comments or conditions for fire protection requirements. All Fire Protection measures were addressed on Plot Pla: 18. All questions regarding the meaninS of conditions shall be referred tl~e Planning and Engineering sZaff. RAYMOND E. EgGI8 Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cahral, Fire Safety Specialist (714) 694d070 · I~AX (714) ~6 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS S%STAFFR~7232,TPt4 2 1 CITY OF TEMECULA VICINITY MAP ~10 SCALE CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 VICINITY MAP S~STAFFRPT~27232.TPM CITY OF TEMECULA SWAP (Exhibit B) Designation: ~-4000 0 0 o % ZONING (Exhibit C) Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 P.C. Date: February 3, 1992 Designation: CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 EXHIBIT: D SURROUNDING LAND USE MAP P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 S~STAFFRPT~27232.TPM CITY OF TEMECULA / / \ \ \ / / N CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 EXHIBIT: E P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 SITE PLAN S~STAFFRPT~27232.TPt~ CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: F P.C. DATE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 SITE PLAN, PLOT PLAN NO. 18 February 3, 1992 S~STAFFRPT~.7232 .TFf~l ITEM RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 3, 1992 Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 Prepared By: Matthew Fagan ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1, and; ADOPT Resolution No. 92-_ approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. I based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: The Koll Company Melchior Land Surveying, Inc. A 6 parcel industrial subdivision of a 13.94 acre site. Westerly of Ynez Road and northerly of Winchester Road. I-P (Industrial Park) North: I-P (Industrial Park) South: I-P (Industrial Park) East: I-P (Industrial Park) West: Interstate 15 Not requested. Industrial Buildings and Vacant Land North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Interstate 15 PROJECT STATISTICS Size of Site: No. of Proposed Parcels: Parcel Sizes: Existing Buildings: Approved Buildings: 13.94 acres 6 Parcel 1: 1.96 acres Parcel 2: 3.09 acres Parcel 3: 1.98 acres Parcel 4: 2.48 acres Parcel 5: 2.75 acres Parcel 6: 1.68 acres 78,751 square feet (Plot Plan No. 10745) 116,368 square feet (Plot Plan No. 11621 ) BACKGROUND Plot Plan No. 10745 was approved by Riverside County on October 24, 1988. The approved Plot Plan No. 10745 consists of three industrial buildings totalling 78,751 square feet on 5.1 acres. Plot Plan No. 11621 was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on November 27, 1989. On May 18, 1990, the file was transferred to the City of Temecula. Plot Plan No. 11621 was approved by the City Planning Commission on August 20, 1990. The approved Plot Plan No. 11621 consists of five industrial buildings totalling 116,368 square feet on approximately 8.9 acres. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, was submitted to the City of Temecula on August 12, 1991. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 proposes a division of six parcels on 13.94 acres. Plot Plan No. 10745 and Plot Plan No. 11621 were previously approved on this site. Development Review Committee (DRC) meetings were held on September 12, 1991 and December 19, 1991 for Parcel Map 27239, Amended No. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is a 6 parcel industrial land division on the site of 2 approved plot plans for an industrial business park. The proposed parcels range from 1.68 acres to 3.09 acres. Parcel 1 has one existing building on it, Parcel 2 has two existing buildings located on it. Parcels 3, 4 and 6 each have one approved building to be located on them. Parcel 5 will have two approved buildings located on it. ANALYSIS Area Setting The majority of the site was previously graded as part of a mass grading effort for Plot Plan No. 10745. The western most portion of the site will still require grading. A 30 foot wide drainage easement currently exists in the northwest corner of the site. The existing landscaped slope adjacent to Interstate 15 will not be affected. The concrete drainage swales at the foot of this slope will also remain, diverting water run-off from Interstate 15. Parcel Size Ordinance No. 348, Section 10.4(a) stipulates that the minimum lot size in the I-P (Industrial Park) zone is 20,000 square feet. The proposed parcels range in size from 1.68 acres to 3.09 acres, thus, conforming to the minimum lot size in the I-P zone. Parking/Internal Circulation Condition of Approval number 12 ensures that the reciprocal requirements for parking are met and will run with the land. Access to the site will be provided by three driveways on Ynez Road. The internal site circulation plan provides adequate area to drive through the project. EXISTING ZONING, SWAP, AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The project as conditioned, conforms with the existing zoning (I-P) affecting the subject property, meets the requirements of Section 10. 10 of Ordinance No. 460, and is compatible with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) land use recommendation of General Light Industrial. As such, it is likely that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. I will be consistent with the City's General Plan recommendations for the subject property, upon the plan's final adoption. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study was completed by Staff for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1. Staff has determined that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project could have a significant impact upon the environment. Mitigation measures, which have been described in the Initial Study and added as Conditions of Approval, will reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant. Staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted. In addition, pursuant to the requirements of Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) which authorizes the charging of certain fees for the filing of Negative Declarations which provide funding for the Department of Fish and Game, the Planning Department Staff has included Condition No. 17 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 is a proposal to subdivide 13.94 acres into 6 parcels. Two Plot Plans have been previously approved for the site, (Plot Plan No. 10745 and Plot Plan No. 11621 ). The site has been previously mass graded under Plot Plan No. 10745, however some additional grading will be required on site. The parcel sizes will conform with the minimum size requirement for the Industrial Park (I-P) zone. The project as conditioned, conforms with Ordinance No. 348, Ordinance No. 460 and SWAP. An Initial Study was completed for the project and a Negative Declaration was recommended due to mitigation measures which were included as Conditions of Approval for the project. S~STAFFRPT~.7239-1 .Pt,I 3 FINDINGS The proposed land division is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP), Ordinance No. 460 and Ordinance No. 348. The SWAP designation is General Light Industrial. The parcels meet the requirements of Section 10.10 of Ordinance No. 460 for Schedule "E" Parcel Map Divisions. The parcels meet the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size criteria under Ordinance No. 348. The lot design is logical and meets the approval of the City's Planning and Public Works Departments. The lot design facilitates parldng, access, and site design. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration is recommended and all impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels through recommended conditions of approval. An Initial Study was prepared including mitigation measures which will alleviate all impacts. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, based on analysis contained in the Staff Report. The surrounding area currently supports industrial projects, and is identified by SWAP as General Light Industrial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. If the proposed use is inconsistent, it will not be detrimental because of the industrial nature of surrounding uses. The project as proposed provides adequate provisions for future passive or natural solar heating or cooling opportunities. All six parcels include sufficient southern exposure. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. This Staff Report contains mapping, Conditions of Approval, and an Initial Study which support the Staff recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Staff recommends Commission: that the Planning ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1, and; ADOPT Resolution 92- approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. I based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. vgw S',STAFFFFr~7239-1.PM 4 Attachments: 2, 3, 4, Resolution - page 6 Conditions of Approval - page 12 Initial Environmental Study - page 21 Exhibits - page 37 Vicinity Map SWAP Map Zoning Map Site Plan Plot Plan No. 10745 and 11621 Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan No. 11621 - page 38 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92--- ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27239 AMD. NO. I TO SUBDIVIDE A 13.94 ACRE PARCEL INTO 6 PARCELS WESTERLY OF YNEZ ROAD AND NORTHERLY OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-201-003-6 WHEREAS, The Koll Company filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. I in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Tentative Parcel Map on February 3, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Tentative Parcel Map; and Parcel Map; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of said Tentative NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: 1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: A. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. B. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (1) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being S%STAFFRPT~27239*l .PM 7 (1) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (3) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the General Plan. The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: (1) There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. I is consistent with Ordinance No. 460, Ordinance No. 348 and SWAP and it is likely that it will be consistent with the General Plan. (2) There is tittle or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted General Ran if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, Even if the project is approved and is found to be inconsistent with the General Plan, industrial uses are the predominant use in the area. (3) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The parcels conform to the requirements and criteria prescribed by Ordinance No. 460 and Ordinance No. 348. 4. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made: That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit: The proposed land division is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP), Ordinance 348, and Ordinance 460. The SWAP designation is General Light Industrial. The parcels meet the requirements of Section 10. 10 of Ordinance No. 460 and they meet the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size criteria under Ordinance No. 348. The lot design is logical and meets the approval of the City's Planning and Public Works Departments. The lot design facilitates parking, access, and site design. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration is recommended and all impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels through recommended conditions of approval. An Initial Study was prepared including mitigation which will alleviate all impacts. De There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, based on analysis contained in the Staff Report. The surrounding area currently supports industrial projects, and is identified by SWAP as General Light Industrial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. If the proposed use is inconsistent, it will not be detrimental because of the industrial nature of surrounding uses. The project as proposed provides adequate provisions for future passive or natural solar heating or cooling opportunities. All six proposed parcels include sufficient southern exposure. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. This Staff Report contains mapping, Conditions of Approval, and an Initial Study which support the Staff recommendation. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION III, the Tentative Parcel Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. SECTION II. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION III. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. 1 for the subdivision of a 13.94 acre parcel into 6 parcels located westerly of Ynez Road and northerly of Winchester Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910- 201-003-6 subject to the following conditions: 1. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. SECTION IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1992. JOHN E. HOAGLAND CHAIRMAN S%STAFF~7239-1 .FfvI 10 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of' February, 1992 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS S%STAFFRP'i'~27239-1,FtA 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S~STAFFRPT~27239-1 .PM 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amd. No. 1 Project Description: A 6 parcel planned industrial subdivision of a 13.94 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-201-003-6 Planning Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is 6. 7. 8. 9. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated September 11, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of Transportation transmittal dated September 9, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated September 11, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlines in the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated September 11, 1991. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Industrial Park zone. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. $~TAFFRPT~.723~l.R,A 13 10. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. 11. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan". "Drainage easements shall be left free of buildings and obstructions." 12. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection, 13. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amended No. 1, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 14. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground, with easements provided as required. 15. No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the S\STAFFRP~27239-1 .FM 14 development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 16. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. 17. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars (1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars (91250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). 18. Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. 1 will need to comply with any and all conditions of underlying Plot Plan No. 11621. Building and Safety Department Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide information to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that building setbacks and exterior wall construction comply with the provisions of table 5A, 1988 Uniform Building Code for proximity to property line. Public Works Department The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. S%STAFFRPT%27239-T,PM 15 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 19. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; CalTrans Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; and City of Temecula Fire Bureau; 20. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 21. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. 22. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Ynez Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of three entry points as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the Department of Public Works. 23. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. 24. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following Engineering conditions: A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. C. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association S~TAFFRPT~.723~l.Pt4 16 are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. 25. 26. 27. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. (1) The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered tots or numbered lots. (2) All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. (3) Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. The subdivider shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. $\STAFFRPT~27239-1 .PM 17 28. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted as directed by the Department of Public Works at the time of application for grading plan check. 29. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Department of Public Works. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 30. Updated drainage calculations shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. All drainage facilities shall be upgraded and installed as required by the Department of Public Works. 31. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map and "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 32. An easement for the mail boxes adjacent to the public street right-of-way shall be recorded and shown on the final map. 33. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 34. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until a NPDES permit is granted or the project is shown to be exempt. 36. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 37. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 38. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 39. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters have been obtained, and approval of the grading plan has been granted by the Department of Public works. S\STAFFRFr~27239-1.FlVl 18 40. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April inclusive, erosion control and runoff mitigation plans will be required. All plans shall be submitted with appropriate notes as directed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 41. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is I~ayable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 42. An encroachment permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within their right-of-way. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 43. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 44. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 45. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the security shall be 92.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; prOvidqd that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 46. Construct all improvements including but not limited to, curb and/or gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, and drainage devices as shown on the approved plans. S\STAFFRPT~27239-1.N 19 Transportation Enaineerjna PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 47. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Ynez Road. 48. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: 49. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Cjty Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 50. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 51. Provide limited landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance. S\STAFFRPT~27239-I-FtVl 20 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE, CA, 9250~ (Mlilih9 Addreas -- P,O, Box 7600 9ZSt~-7600) September 11 , 1991 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43180 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, SUITE 200 'I*~MECULA, CA 92390 AI-IN: Richard Ayala: RE: PARCEL MAP N0. 27239: BEING A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF MAP NO. 19677, IN THE CITY 0F Tu~ECULA, COUN'I'Y OF RIVERSIDE, STA'I~ OF CALIFORNIA. (6 lots) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Parcel Map No. 27239 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Day. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Parcel Map No. 27239, is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Parcel Map". City of Temecula Page Two Attn: Richard Ayala September 11, 1991 This cerLification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Parcel Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose". This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to The City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the reuuest for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Parcel Map N0. 27239 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed parcel map." City of Temecula Page Three Attn: Richard Ayala September 11, 1991 The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the reauest for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prier to recerdation of the final map. Sincerely, S~am~MVrar~.H.S. Environmental Health Services SM:dr STATE OF CAUFO~NIA.--iUSINES$, TRANSPC~ATIC~ AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTM, ENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICY 8, P.O. BOX 231 SAN 8ERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 1991 Development Review 08-Riv-15-?.12/7.22 Planning Department City Hall Attention Mr. Richard Ayala City of Temeoula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Your Reference: TPM 27239 Dear Mr. Ayala: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 27239 located east of 1-15, north of Highway 79 (Winchester Road) and west of Ynez Road in Temecula. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval of grading and drainage will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Salah or Mr. Wisniewski of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-- 4384. Very truly yours, Chief, Development Review Branch Attachment YOUR P,~FEREHCE PLAN CHECKER WE REQUEST THAT THE ITEMS CHECKED BELOW APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: NORHAL RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO PROVIDE HONHAL STREET INPROt/EHENT$ TO PROVIDE __ (::~URB AND GUTTERt STATE STANDARD DATE BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF HALF--WIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHWAY. HALF--VIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHWAY. ALONG THE STATE HIGHWAY, PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE STATE NIGHWAY BY PAINTING THE ClJRB RED AND/ON BY THE PROHER PLACENENT OF NO PARKING SIGNS, RADIUS CIJR8 RETURNS SHALL 8E PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS ~ITH THE STATE HIGHWAY. STATE $TANDARD~NEELCKAIR RAHPS S~L~LL BE PROVIDED IN THE CIJR8 RETURNS · A POSITIVE VEHICletAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LINIT PHYSICAL ACCESS lO THE STATE HIGHWAY, VEHICULAR ACCESS SIIALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGHgAY, /VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED 8Y EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CONNECTIONS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STANDARD DRXV~dAY$, VEHIOJL~R AClli$$ SHALL NOT BE ItOVIDS) VITHIN OF THE INI~SECTION AT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE NIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY 'A ROAD--TYPE CONNECTION, VEHICULAR ACCESS CONNECTIONS SItALL BE PAVED AT L~ST WITHIN THE STATE HIGHI~Y RIGHT OF VAT. ACCESS POINTS TO THE STATE HIGHLY SHALL BE DEt/ELOPED IN A t~NNER T~T WILL PROVIDE SIGHT DISTAnCE FON HPH ALOVG THE STATE HIGHWAY. "' LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE HIGHgAY SHALL PROVIDE FON SAFE SIGHT DISTANCIEt CONPLy WITH FIXED IDaJECT SET BAC3~ AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS° EASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIOIL~L COtaJ~ENTS, PROVIDE TO APPLICANT. V//C,(~4STRU~TION/DEHOLITION WITHIN PRESENT OR pROPOSED STATE RIGHT OF gAY SHGIJLD 8E INVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS *JASTE ( I .E ,ASBESTOSt PETRORHENICALSt ETC. ) AND NITIGATED AS PER REQUIRERENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIr ~///T~qHEH PLANS ARE SIJBHITTEDI PLEASE CONFORH TO THE REOUIRENENTS OF THE ATTACHED II~"]JkNDOLITII o ~.~H[S WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEM PROCESS AND TIME REQL/IRED FOR I:)LAN CHECK, ~ ~I~,LTXOUGH THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVT~ A SZGNIFICANT EFFECT OR THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTENr CnNSIDERATIOR RUST BE GIVEN TO THE CUHULATIV~ EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPNEHT IN THIS AREA. ~i~HY NEASURES NECESGARY TO NITISATE THE Ct,INLILATIVE ]HPACT OF TPJ~FFIC AND/ON DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO OR WITH DEV~LC~ENT OF THE AREA THAT HECESSITATES CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISIONt OR FUTURE PROVZEZON~ OF $IGNILIZ-I, TION AND LIGHTING OF THE ~:]:T APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC A~D/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEN OF THE AREA, ~I~NY NEASURES TO NITIF, ATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE INPACTS SHALL 6E i NCLIJOED Wl TH THE DEVELOPHINT , V/THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY IS iNCLUDED ZN THE ~LIFORNIA ]f, ASTER PLAN OF STATE ]'TIGHWAYS I?.LIGIBLE FOR OFFICIAL SCENIC ]'~IGHWAY DESIGNATION AND IN THE FUTURE yOUR AGENCY PAY WISH TO PAVE THiS Ri3JTE OFFICIALLY' DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC NIGHWAYt AND DEVELCi~HENT IN THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE CCNPATIBLE WiTH THE SCENIC HIGHWAY CONCEPT, V////ZT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS C~)NSIDERABLE PUBLIC CONCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO REAVILT TRAVELLED H]GHt~AyS. ,T~AND DEVELOPHENTt IN ORDER TO BE CGNPATIBLE WITH THIS CORCERNt PAT REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTENUATIOR MEASURES, DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTy SHOULD INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY NOISE ATTENUATION, CAL~RJLNS DISTRICT 8 DEYELOPMEHT iR~VIEW BRANCH P.O. ]30x 231 SAN ]3ERNARDINO~ ~ 92402 ~ ~Y OF ~Y D~ENTS PR~IDIMG DDITI~AL STATE HIGHUAY RIGHT OF UAY ~ RE~DATZ~ OF THE ~, COPy OF THE TRAFFIC Cx~ ENVI!~"CINNENTAL STUDY. CHECK PRINT OF THE Z~ARCEL OR ~'RACT PAP, CHECK PRINT OF THE PI,/J4S FOR ABlY IMEROVTHENT$ WITNIN OR ADJACERT TO THE STATE NIGHWAY RIGHT OP kIAT, CHECIC PRINT OF THE GRADING ~ DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY IJHEN AVAILABLE, RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 THIRD 5'TI;E'T. RIVERSIDE. CA 92507-3484. BUS. (714) 684.0850 FAX [714] 68¢1007 September 11, 1991 Mr. Richard Ayala Temecula Planning Department City of Tem~cu!a 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Re: PM 27239 Dear Richard: We currently provide service to the site mentioned above via RTA Route 23 and we are requesting that a bus turnout or a pad for a bus stop be incorporated into the general design as the size of the planned project will negatively impact our level of service unless this amenity is constructed. An ideal location for the bus turnout/bus stop would be on westside of Ynez Road farside the middle entrance, east of proposed Building H. I can provide an exact location for the turnout/bus pad as the project progresses. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Your efforts to keep us updated on the status of this request will be very much apprecia=ed. Please let us know when this project will be completed. Should you require additional information or specifications, please don't hesitate to contact me. Transit Planner BB:as PDEV#92 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2~ W~T SAN YClNTO AVB,'~jE * PRRRI$. CALIFORNIA 92~0 (71~) 6t7-~I~ OLBN J. NBWMAN' ~ CHIB!~ 1991 ~T'rlg: PLANNING DEPT RE: PARCEL NAF 27239 With =sipset to the conditions o~ approval ear the above re£srtnced dtv~sion, the Firs Dspart~nsnt =soonminds the ~cllovtn~ Sire p~otaction measures be provided in accordance ~.th live=side County Ord~nee$ a~/or recollect ~$~0 protection stan~ards~ All questions relerdt~ the me&sin8 oe conditions shall be referred the PlenninS and ~n~neerin ~c/~ 41002 Co~ ~ l)wi',e., .c/die 121, Tern, &|4) eN30~ · FAX ~'14) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gCIS COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE, BEDLANDS, C~,LIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3003. REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92373-0306 Dater ~'M-~I 12,,~, it 9/o-Eol-oo3-G ( ) ( ) ( ) Per your request Copy/Copies of our Maps Copy of your Dwg./Plan with respect to the location of our facilities indicates thatt ) Please forward prints of your Plan & Profile showing the location of our facilities ) Please forward two sets of your approved plans (X3 No conflict is expected ( ) A conflict is expected (see description below or attachment) ( ) Our relocation plan is attached for yours ( ) Review ( ) Approval ( ) Comments ( ) Depth checks and/or elevations were taken ( ) the location(s) requested ( ) the location{s) mutually agreed upon ( ) the location(s) we deemed necessary ( ) Depth or elevation information is tabulated or shown graphically on the enclosed or attached. CommentsI If you desire further information on any cost of gas installation, please contact our Builder Services Department at (714) 335-7775. Dan Orr Planning Technician (714) 335-7828 A'!'I'ACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY S~STAFFRP'i'~27239-1 .N 2 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: The Koll Comoanv Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1600 Chicaao Avenue. Suite R-1 Riverside. CA 92507 (714) 781-3485 Date of Environmental Assessment: January 7.1992 4~ Agency Requiring Assessment: CITY OF TEMECULA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Tentative Parcel MaD No. 27239. Amended No. 1 Location of Proposal: Westerlv of Ynez Road and Northerly of Winchester Road ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets.) Ye~ Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? X Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? $\STAFFRPT%27239-1 .Ffd 22 Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or take? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Yes Maybe N._.~o X X X X X X S~STA~F.~r~723S~ .N 23 Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes Maybe N__o X X X X X X X X X S~TAFFRPT~27239-1 .FM 24 10. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. Wilt the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Yes Maybe N_9o X X X X X X X X X X S~,STAFFRPT%27239-1 ,PNI 25 11. 12. 13o 14. Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of arl area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Sinvices. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Yes Maybe N__Qo X X X X X S~STAF~PT~72ag-~ ... 26 Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 16. 17. 18, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes Maybe No _ __x _ X X X X X X X X X X X X S'~STAF~RPT%27239-1.PI~ 27 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes Maybe N__~o X S\STAFFRPT%27239-1 .F~I 28 Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe X X S~,STAFFRPT~7239-1 .PM 29 III DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Earth 1.a. 1.b. 1.c. 1.d. 1.e. 1.f. 1.g. Ai__r 2.a,b,c. No. Construction is not proposed at depths sufficient to adversely affect geologic substructures of the site. Similarly significant grading/fill activities are not proposed - no significant impacts. Yes. Compaction and overcovering of soil is necessary to implement the proposal. The relatively nominal scale of this project does not indicate likelihood of significant impacts on regional topography or soil characteristics. No. Reference Items 1 .a and 1 .b. The subject site is essentially level at present. Further, fill activities of significance are not proposed. No. No unique geologic or topographic features currently exist on the subject site. No. Nominal alterations in regional surface erosion patterns can be expected when this project is eventually realized. Proposed additional on-site structures and paving will likely reduce erosion at the project site; resulting in additional off-site drainage discharge volumes. Impacts on regional drainage characteristics are insignificant as mitigated by project specific drainage conveyances. (Reference City of Temecula Engineering Department Conditions of Approval.) No. Construction is not proposed that would logically affect distant beach sands. Neither should the project produce deposition/erosion potentially modifying stream channels or lake beds. Maybe. The area is within a potential liquefaction zone. County Geologic Report No. 293 prepared for Parcel Map No. 19677 (the underlying Parcel Map) contained liquefaction analysis which determined that there were layers of loose sands at depths of 29 feet or more that could liquify during the maximum probable earthquake of Richter Magnitude 6.0 for the site. Mitigation measures contained in the report would reduce damage due to liquefaction to a level of less than significant. No. Addition of localized air pollutants will result from increased vehicle traffic accessing the project site with little or no noticeable regional impacts. Short term increases in localized pollutants and associated noxious odors are likely during construction activities. Impacts are not considered significant regionally. S',STAFFRPT%27239-1 .RM 30 Water 3.b. 3.c. 3.d,e. 3.f,g. 3.h. 3.i. Plant Life 4.a-d. No. The proposed structure is not located within defined marine or fresh water flows. Maybe. Currently permeable ground will be rendered impervious as a result of this proposal. Consequently, surface runoff and absorption rates on the project site itself will change. Site drainage shall conform with plans approved by the City of Temecula. Necessary improvements to effect proper site drainage shall be as indicated in the attached drainage plans and project conditions of approval. No significant impacts on drainage patterns are anticipated. Reference also Item 1 .e. No. Plans proposed at this time indicate no potential adverse on or off site flooding impacts. Proposed drainage plans and all related necessary improvements shall be as specified by the City Engineering Department. No. Increased runoff from the project site may nominally increase surface levels and turbidity of off-site bodies of water with no impacts of significance. No. Reduced permeation at the project site may eventually affect underlying groundwater. Impacts of this project individually are considered insignificant. No. Water consumption rates typical of small industrial projects is proposed. All water consumption activities are subject to monitoring and allowances specified by the applicable purveyor. Landscaping and irrigation shall respect current drought conditions affecting the City as specified in Plot Plan No. 11621 Conditions of Approval and exhibited by the proposed project landscape and irrigation plan concepts. No. Reference Item No. 3.c. No. No quantities of native plants are currently present on, or in the vicinity of the subject site, including those species identified as "rare or endangered". Further, new plant species which may be introduced as a result of required site landscaping cannot be considered invasive because of the referenced lack of existing on-site native varieties. Similarly, no impacts are anticipated on agricultural assets. $%$TAFFRPT"~7239-1.Ff~ 31 Animal Life 6.a-c. Maybe. Minor losses of common urban species, e.g., small lizards, insects, rodents, and their habitats may result from this project. Numerically and qualitatively, these losses are considered environmentally insignificant. Further, if not previously paid, the applicant is required to submit Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat procurement fees in the amount specified by City ordinance. Such monies are to be used for purchase of suitable habitat for the Kangaroo Rat as it is gradually displaced due to generalized development of the Temecula Valley. This proposal contributes incrementally to regional displacement of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. Noise 6.8. Maybe. Minor increases in local ambient noise levels will occur. 6.b. Maybe. Subsequent to project implementation and industrial occupancy of the project site, area-wide noise impacts will be insignificant. Proposed hours of operation shall conform with normal business hours of operations, generally considered to be between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. Short term construction noise levels generated may result in temporary localized disturbances considered insignificant over the long-term. LiQht and Glare Maybe. While the project could potentially impact night skies, the proposal is required to comply with applicable City/Palomar Observatory lighting policies and ordinance(s). These policies and ordinances address potential night-sky lighting impacts of development proposals that might logically affect activities of the Mr. Palomar Astronomical Observatory. Land Use No. No anticipated impacts. The project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348 (Industrial Park), Ordinance No. 460, and Southwest Area Plan guidelines (General Light Industrial) affecting the subject property. No change in Land Use designations is proposed in conjunction with this project. Natural Resources 9.a,b. No. The proposal is of limited scale and will not logically deplete substantial amounts of renewable or non-renewable natural resources. S%STAFFRPT%27239-1 .PM 32 Risk of Ueset 10.a,b. No. At present, there are only generalized types of uses proposed for the development. In the event that hazardous substances will be stored on site, the appropriate agencies will assure that these substances are handled properly. This will provide assurance that no negative impacts will occur due to accident or upset. In addition, the proper storage will not interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Pooulation 11. No. As proposed, the project will ultimately create employment in the area which may create a rise in population during the day. The increase from this project will not be significant, due to the actual number of workers employed in light industrial businesses proposed. In addition, jobs will be created for people already living in the area. Housina 12. No. With an increase in employment, there is the possibility of an increase in the demand for housing in the area. The increased need generated from this project will not be significant, due to the actual number of employees employed in light industry businesses proposed. TransoortationlCirculation 13.a,c. No. Commercial/Industrial construction of relatively limited scale is proposed, generating similarly limited amounts of destination traffic, Traffic generated will consist primarily of daily commuting employees. Nominal amounts of visitor traffic can also be expected. Regionally, traffic impacts of this individual project are determined to be insignificant. Further, the project is required to contribute monies to area-wide, as well as localized public improvements (e.g., signalization mitigation) proportionate to the proposal's anticipated impacts as determined by the City Public Works Department. 13.b. No. In compliance with City ordinance and project specific requirements, the previously approved Plot Plan No. 10745 and Plot Plan No. 11621 will provide a total of 545 additional off-street, improved parking spaces. 13.d. No. The project will attract additional destination traffic, primarily employees and service vehicles, to the subject site upon its implementation. Impacts on regional circulation patterns are expected to be insignificant given the proposal's limited scale. Reference also Item 13.a. 13.e. No. The project is not in a location which will logically affect waterborne, rail or air traffic, nor does it propose addition or deletion of such facilities. S~STAFFRPT~27239-1 .PM 33 13.f. Maybe. Increases in traffic generated by this proposal may consequently increase the possibility of traffic accidents. Impacts are likely to be unnoticeable in view of the proposal's limited scope and proposed infrastructure improvements supporting the project. Public Services 14.a-c. Maybe. New industrial development may generate at least nominal increased demands for police and fire protection services, utility provisions and, indirectly, schools. Mitigation is realized through project-specific building permit fees, assessment districts, property taxes, and similar funding mechanisms. 14.d. Maybe. Construction is not proposed which will directly impact schools or parks. However, the applicant is required by state law to contribute applicable school fees as partial mitigation for secondary impacts on school systems resulting from the Industrial development proposed. 14.e. Maybe. Construction of new roads and associated increases in road maintenance activities in the immediate vicinity of the proposal will be required due to proportionate increases in traffic generated locally. Mitigation of such impacts are as specified by the City Public Works Department in the project's Conditions of Approval, attached. 14.f. No. Impacts on other governmental services have not been identified at this time. Enerav 15.a,b. No. Reference Item Nos. 9.a. and b. utilities 16.a-f. No. Service line extensions and increased demands can be expected for the utilities referenced. The facility itself supports regional water acquisition and distribution activities. No significant impacts are anticipated. Human Health 17.a,b. No. The project does not include introduction of potential health hazards of significance to the region; nor are there existing identified health hazards at the project site. Potential hazards associated with use and storage of toxic materials on the subject site could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. S~S~FFRm~72ae-~ .F~ 34 Aesthetics 18. No. The application has been reviewed for architectural quality and compatibility by the City, and is considered appropriate in the context of existing and proposed development in its vicinity. Recreation 19. No. Additional recreational assets are not proposed, nor are they to be deleted in conjunction with this project; direct impacts on recreational facilities are not anticipated. Cultural Resources 20.a. No. The site was previously graded under Plot Plan No. 10745. Mitigation measures were included to assure the preservation of cultural resources in the event that any were disturbed. 20.b. No. The proposal is not within an identified historic preservation/conservation district. As such, impacts on the existing character of historic assets in the region are unlikely. 21 .a,b, c,d. No. Reference Item Nos. 1-20. mSTAFFRPT~.7239-'I .m 3 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. For CITY OF TEMECULA S\STAFFRPT'~,7239-1 .PM 36 AI'rACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS S',~TAFFRPT%27239-1.PM 37 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 EXHIBIT: A VICINITY MAP ~>.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 CITY OF TEMECULA S C-P-S A-2-20 CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 EXHIBIT: C ZONING MAP P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 S\STAFFRPT~27239-1 ,PM CITY OF TEMECULA L! CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 EXHIBIT: B SWAP MAP P.C. DATE: February 3, 1992 S\STAFFRPT%27239-1 ,PM CITY OF TEMECULA ...... CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: D P.C. DATE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 SITE PLAN February 3, 1992 CITY OF TEMECULA PLOT PLAN NO. 10745 PLOT PLAN NO. 11621 CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: E P.C. DATE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 PLOT PLAN NO. 10745 AND 11621 February 3, 1992 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 11621 S',STAFFRPT',27239-1 .PM 38 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Conditions of Approval Plot Plan No. 11621 CouncilApprovalDate: Expi rati on Date: Piannlncl Department This project shall comply with the provisions of State law and the City Development Code. This conditional approval shall expire in three 13) years, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the provisions of applicable State law and local ordinance. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following agencies shall provide verification to the Building and Safety Department that all pertinent Conditions of Approval and applicable have been met: A. Planning Department B. Temecula Union School District C. Fire District D. Engineering Department E. Rancho California Water District F. Department of Building and Safety G. RiversideCountyDepartmentofEnvironmentaIHealthServices(DEHS). This project must comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 19677. Architectural elevations of all proposed structures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of buiidlng permits. The elevations shall substantially conform to those submitted November 27, 1989. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. STAFFRPT\PP11621 11. 12. All site amenities, including landscaping and irrigation, as shown on plans approved by the Planning Department, shall be installed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping shall utilize drought tolerant/desert-appropriate landscaping wherever feasible. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of such approval, or, in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees for any Court costs and attorney~s fees which the City, its agents officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. Applicant shall submit the site plan as approved by the Plannln9 Department to the Department of Building and Safety concurrent with application for building permits. All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained with double or hairpin lines on the surface of the facility. Any lights used to illuminate the site shall be designed so as to reflect away from adjoining properties and public thoroughfares. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall camply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Southwest Area Plan. Signs shall be reviewed under separate application. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Riverside County Department of Health Services prior to Certificate of Occupancy. During the grading process of the site, a paleontologist shall be present to supervise the grading and determine the significance of any unearthed paleentolagical resources. If resources are discovered, all grading shall cease until a determination of the find is made by the paleontologist. If cultural resources are encountered during grading, the resources and site shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Enqineerinq Department 15. The developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act. and all applicable City ordinances and resolutions. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans. 17. The developer shall submit four 1~) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these 2 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 25. 26. 29. Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2u,"x36~' mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District. Except for nuisance nature local run-off, which may traverse portions of the property, the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard; however, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage, New construction should comply with all applicable ordinances. All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted through the undersidewalk drains. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit. A permit shall be required from CelTtans for any work within CalTrans right- d-way. The developer shall submit four (i&) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and gooleglcal conditions of the site. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. If a fair and equitable share of the developer~s cost of transportation improvements has not been determined at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is needed, the developer shall be required to deposit $10,000 into a City established Road Benefit Fund. The developer is also required to sign an agreement with the City to either pay an amount or receive a refund equal to the difference between his estimated fair share and the mount of deposit with the City. Prior to occupancy, a signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered traffic engineer, and approved by the City Engineer, for all streets and shall be included in the street improvement plans. 30° Prior to occupancy, Ynez Road shall be dedicated, or right-of-way shown to exist to 50 feet from centerline. 31. Prior to occupancy, all signing and striping shall be installed per the City standards and the approved signing and striping plan. 32° At the discretion of the Traffic Engineer, left turn restrictions may be imposed at any or all of the dirveway access points as deemed necessary for safety reasons, based on future traffic volumes. Fire District 33. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 35. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system 16" x 4" x 2 1/2 x 2 1/2), will be located not less that 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant{s) in the system. 36. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: m~l certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 37. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. 38. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 fee of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building{ s). A statement that the buildlng~ s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. Buildinq and Safety 39. A preliminary soils report shall be filed with and approved by the building official prior to issuance of building permits. 40. Grading plans are to be submitted to and approved by the Department of Building and Safety. 0,1. A pre-construction inspection and permit is required prior to any land disturbance activity to verify requirements for erosion and sediment control, flood hazard and native plant protection and management. Rancho California Water District 0,2. The water purveyor shall be Rancho California Water District. 0,3. Sewer Collection and disposal shall be by Eastern Municipal Water District. Temecula Union School District qu,. This project is subject to State law requirements for school impact mitigation. U. S. Postal Service 0,5. The United States Postal Service encourages that the final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and the Public Works Department. Riverside County Del~artment of Environmental Health Services 0,6. "Will-serve" letters from water and sewer agencies are required prior to building plan approval. 0,7. If there are to be any food establishments, three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. 0,8. If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch { Jon Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: A. Underground storage tanks. B. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. C. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185). D. Waste reduction management. California Department of Transportation 0,9. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit a copy of Conditions of Approval and Grading and Drainage Plans to CaITrans. 5 ITEM # 7 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 3, 1992 Approval Authority Ordinance The attached approval authority matrix, has been revised per Commission direction. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission recommend approval of Ordinance No. 92-__, an interior Ordinance regulating the approval of land use regulations. lb APPROVAL AUTHORITY ITEM STAFF *PLAN. DIRECTOR 1. Certificate of Compliance X 2. Change of Zone/Ordinance Amendment. 3. Conditional Use Permit {Existing Building) 4. Conditional Use Permit (Not In Existing Building) 5. Final Map 6. General Plan Amendment 7. Parcel Merger X 8. Lot Line Adjustment X 9. Parking Adjustment X 10. Plot Plan for Antennae and Off-Site Advertising 11. Plot Plan Under 10,000 Sq. Ft. Exempt from CEQA 12. Plot Plan Under 10,000 Sq. Ft. Non Exempt from CEQA 13. Plot Plan Over 10,000 Sq. Ft. 14. Public Use Permit Under 10,000 Sq. Ft. Exempt from CEQA. 15. Public Use Permit Under 10,000 Sq. Ft. Non Exempt from CEQA. 16. Public Use Permit Over 10,000 Sq. Ft. 17. Reversion to Acreage 18. Second Dwelling Unit Permit 19. Special Care Facility 20. Specific Plan/Amendment 21. Substantial Conformence 22. Temporary Use Permit {Under 6 Months) 23. Temporary Use Permit {Over 6 Months) 24. Tentative Parcel Map {Residential Less that 5 Lots} 25. Tentative Parcel Map (Commerical/Industrial) 26. Tentative Tract Map {More than 5 Lots) 27. Time Extension - City Approved Projects 28. Time Extension - County Approved Projects 29. Variance X X X X X X *PLAN. COMMISSION Recommendation X X Recommendation X X X X X X X Recommendation X X X X X X *CITY COUNCIL X X X X *Noticed Public Hea~ing, 300 Ft, for Planning Director Approval, 600 Ft. for Planning Corntulsa/on and City Council Approval.